alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DWT 30366348v1 0105455-000001 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

1300 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400

Portland, Oregon 97201-5610

(503) 241-2300 main  (503) 778-5299 fax

Page 1 - NOTICE OF SUBSEQUENT AUTHORITY RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY

DUANE A. BOSWORTH, OSB #825077

duanebosworth@dwt.com

DEREK D. GREEN, OSB #042960

derekgreen@dwt.com

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

1300 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400

Portland, Oregon 97201-5610

Telephone: (503) 241-2300

Facsimile: (503) 778-5299

CAMERON STRACHER (admitted pro hac vice)

cam@stracherlaw.com

4 New York Plaza, 2d Floor

New York, NY 10004

Telephone: (212) 743-6513

Facsimile: (646) 810-3089

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

AT PORTLAND

CONSUMER CELLULAR, 

INCORPORATED, an Oregon corporation,

PLAINTIFF,

v.

CONSUMERAFFAIRS.COM, INC., a Nevada 

corporation; CONSUMERS UNIFIED, LLC,

a Nevada limited liability company; and 

DAVID ZACHARY CARMAN,

DEFENDANTS.

Case No. 3:15-cv-01908-PK

NOTICE OF SUBSEQUENT

AUTHORITY RE: DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 

PENDING DISPOSITION OF APPEAL

Defendants ConsumerAffairs.com, Inc., Consumers Unified, LLC, and David Zachariah 

Carman (“Defendants”) provide notice of subsequent authority in Kimzey v. Yelp! Inc., 21 

F. Supp. 3d 1120 (W.D. Wash. 2014), referenced in Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings 

Case 3:15-cv-01908-PK Document 63 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 2
DWT 30366348v1 0105455-000001 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

1300 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400

Portland, Oregon 97201-5610

(503) 241-2300 main  (503) 778-5299 fax

Page 2 - NOTICE OF SUBSEQUENT AUTHORITY RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY

Pending Disposition of Appeal (Docket No. 52, at pp. 6 and 9) and Reply (Docket No. 61, at 

pp. 8 and 12). On September 12, 2016, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal 

of the complaint. See Kimzey v. Yelp! Inc., Nos. 14-35487 and 14-35494, __ F.3d __, 2016 

WL 4729492 (9th Cir. Sept. 12, 2016). 

DATED this 19th day of September, 2016.

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

By s/ Derek D. Green

DUANE A. BOSWORTH, OSB #825077

duanebosworth@dwt.com

DEREK D. GREEN, OSB #042960

derekgreen@dwt.com

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Telephone: (503) 241-2300

Attorneys for Defendants

Of Counsel:

CAMERON STRACHER (admitted pro hac vice)

cam@stracherlaw.com

Telephone: (212) 743-6513

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 3:15-cv-01908-PK Document 63 Filed 09/19/16 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MEDFORD DIVISION 

NASH DURHAM; MARY DURHAM, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as 

Trustee for the 

Certificateholders of the 

CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan 

Trust 2007-23CB, Mortgage 

Pass-Through Certificates, 

Series 2007-23CB; NORTHWEST 

TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC. 

Defendants. 

AIKEN, CHIEF JUDGE. 

No. 1:15-cv-00734-CL 

JUDGMENT 

Based on the stipulation of the parties (#23), this case is 

DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs and attorney fees. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ~day of June, 2015. 

1 - JUDGMENT 

Ann L. Aiken 

Chief Judge 

Case 1:15-cv-00734-CL Document 24 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.14G
 SEVENTH AMENDMENT
TO
 CREDIT AGREEMENT
(Term Loan)
 Amendment Agreement , Borrower CoBank Administrative Agent Syndication Party Syndication
Parties
 RECITALS
 St. Paul Bank Credit
Agreement
 First Amendment Second Amendment Third Amendment Fourth Amendment Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment
    1. Definitions .




---



##### 



2. Amendments to Credit Agreement .
  Consolidated Cash Flow
 Consolidated Funded Debt
 Environmental Laws
 Revolving Loan Credit Agreement
  Working Capital
 2




---



##### 



Liabilities of Others NCRA
 Loans
 Investments
 Exhibit 10.8(f) Exhibit 10.8(f)
 Exhibit 10.8(i)
 3




---



##### 



Exhibit 10.8(j)
 ERISA
  Purchase for Own Account; Restrictions on Transfer; Participations Transfer Exhibit 13.26 Syndication Acquisition Agreement
 4




---



##### 



14.4.1
    
    Borrower:
CHS Inc.
5500 Cenex Drive
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 55077
FAX: (651) 355-4554
Attention: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
e-mail address: john.schmitz@chsinc.com
with a copy to:
CHS Inc.
5500 Cenex Drive
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 55077
FAX: (651) 355-4554
Attention: Sr. Vice President and General Counsel
e-mail address: david.kastelic@chsinc.com
 3. Borrowers Representations .
 4. Effective Date . Effective Date
 5




---



##### 



5. Costs; Expenses and Taxes .
 6. General Provisions .
 6.1
 6.2
 6.3
 7. Governing Law .
 8. Counterparts .
  6




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 BORROWER:
CHS INC., a cooperative corporation formed under the
laws of the State of MinnesotaBy:Name:
    John SchmitzTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:
COBANK, ACBBy:Name:
    Michael TousignantTitle:
    Vice President SYNDICATION PARTY:
COBANK, ACBBy:Name:
    Michael TousignantTitle:
    Vice President 7
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Martin Smiley, EVP, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

/s/ Martin Smiley 
Martin Smiley 
EVP, CFO and General Counsel

October 22, 2010

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 1, 2016

s0525 

# Order

Clerk June 1, 2016

151664 & (16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151664

COA: 325317

St. Clair CC: 00

- 003254

- FC

EARL THOMAS BOUGHNER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2015 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to

remand is DENIED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Jeffries, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.), rendered July 7, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, following a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Judge presiding at the *Wade*hearing properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the complainant’s identification testimony since the identification was not the product of an unduly suggestive showup procedure. The record shows that approximately one-half hour after the crime the complainant selected the defendant out of some 20 to 30 people present in a hospital emergency room. Although the arresting officer had previously stated to the complainant that the perpetrators may be at the hospital, he did not state where they were within the hospital or otherwise point them out. In any event, merely "informing a witness that he is going to look at a suspect will not, by itself, -vitiate an otherwise proper identification” *(see, People v Osgood,*89 AD2d 76, 81). Nor does the fact that the police officer told the eyewitness to be "damn sure” of his identification render the identification inadmissible.

*413We also reject the defendant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This court has repeatedly held that were a defendant challenges the complainant’s identification by presenting an alibi, the assessment of the credibility of the witnesses is for the jury *(see, e.g., People v Campbell,*123 AD2d 437; *People v Bonaparte,*114 AD2d 964; *People v Cox,*114 AD2d 968).

Also without merit is the defendant’s claim that the trial court should have found that the People failed to timely disclose *Brady*material. The defendant became aware at the *Wade*hearing, if not sooner, that an eyewitness to the crime had told the police the make and license plate number of the car in which the culprits made their getaway. Yet, the defendant did not object to the People’s failure to disclose this information until after the jury reached a verdict. Under these circumstances, the trial court did not err when it denied the defendant’s application *(see, People v Murphy,*109 AD2d 895; *People v Jones,*85 AD2d 50; *see also, People v Brown,*67 NY2d 555).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved or have no merit. Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Case 6:15-cv-01474-MC    Document 9    Filed 11/05/15    Page 1 of 1
#### CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY CO. v. HENDERSON.

(Decided June 12, 1913.)

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. W. H. Thomas.

Steiner, Crum & Weil, for appellant.

Hill, Hill. Whiting & Stern, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         169,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,100
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,250,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,369,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,657,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          896,000
<BONDS>                                      3,125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,657,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,510,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,679,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (11,600)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             295,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (452,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (452,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (452,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Judd, Chief Financial Officer of ATS Medical, Inc., certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 7, 2006


/s/ John R. Judd
-------------------------------------
Name: John R. Judd
Title: Chief Financial Officer


                                        5
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1973 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1973

 To amend section 2511 of title 18, United States Code, to revise the 
consent exception to the prohibition on the interception of oral, wire, 
                     or electronic communications.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 1998

  Mr. Bumpers (for himself, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Hollings, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 
Torricelli, and Mr. Wellstone) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 2511 of title 18, United States Code, to revise the 
consent exception to the prohibition on the interception of oral, wire, 
                     or electronic communications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telephone Privacy Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF CONSENT EXCEPTION TO PROHIBITION ON INTERCEPTION OF 
              ORAL, WIRE, OR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS.

    Section 2511(2)(d) of title 18, United States Code, shall be 
revised to read as follows:
    ``(d)(i) It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for a person 
not acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic 
communication where all parties to the communication have given prior 
consent to such interception unless such communication is intercepted 
for the purpose of committing any criminal or tortious act in violation 
of the Constitution or laws of the United States or of any State.
    ``(ii) Notwithstanding subparagraph (i), a person may intercept a 
wire, oral, or electronic communication where such person is a party to 
the communication and the communication conveys threats of physical 
harm, harassment or intimidation.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006034EN.01000201.xml

| 10.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 34/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption:

Member State: Czech Republic — NUTS 4: Žďár nad Sázavou (NUTS 3: Jihlava region, NUTS 2: Southeast)

Aid number: N 300/2004

Title: Sale of land for subsidised price in the industrial zone in the street Jamská in Žďár nad Sázavou

Objective: to promote regional development (Not sector specific)

Legal basis: Usnesení z 9. řádného zasedání města Žďár nad Sázavou konaného dne 27. května 2004 (Podmínky prodeje stavebních pozemků v průmyslové zóně na ulici Jamská ve Žďáře nad Sázavou)

Budget: estimate — CZK 66,417 million (EUR 2,19 million) until 2008

Intensity or amount: maximum aid intensities: 48 %, 63 % (SMEs)

Duration: until 31 December 2008

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption:

Member States: Belgium

Aid No: N 334/2005

Title: Excise reduction for biofuels

Objective: Environmental protection

Legal basis: Projet de loi-programme modifiant certaines dispositions de la loi-programme du 27 décembre 2004

Ontwerp van programmawet tot wijziging van een aantal bepalingen van de programmawet van 27 december 2004

Budget: c.a. EUR 184 million per year

Duration: 6 years

Further information: Annual reports

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: Austria

Aid No: NN 43/2004

Title: Tax exemption for biofuels

Objective: Environmental aid

Legal basis: Mineralölsteuergesetz 1995, Kraftstoffverordnung 1999

Duration: until 30 September 2011

Other information: Austria committed itself to monitor annually the production cost and modify the scheme accordingly if overcompensation occurs

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of July 31, 2007, and for the period then ended.



|                         |  |                                           
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: September 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Tracy G. Smith                        
|                         |  | Tracy G. Smith                            
|                         |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 52006DC0773 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006DC0773

**Communication from the Commission to the Council - Accession negotiations with Turkey /* COM/2006/0773 final */ **

*

*

[pic] | COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels, 29.11.2006

COM(2006) 773 final

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL

Accession negotiations with Turkey

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL

Accession negotiations with Turkey

1. The Commission notes that Turkey has not fully implemented the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement, and that restrictions to the free movement of goods, including restrictions on means of transport, remain in force.

2. In these circumstances and with reference to the declaration of 21 September 2005 of the European Community and its Members States, the Commission recommends that the Intergovernmental Conference on Accession with Turkey should not open negotiations on chapters covering policy areas relevant to Turkey's restrictions as regards the Republic of Cyprus until the Commission confirms that Turkey has fulfilled its commitments. These chapters are: Chapter 1 Free movement of goods, Chapter 3 Right of establishment and freedom to provide services, Chapter 9 Financial services, Chapter 11 Agriculture and rural development, Chapter 13 Fisheries, Chapter 14 Transport policy, Chapter 29 Customs union, and Chapter 30 External relations.

3. Moreover, the Commission recommends that no chapter be provisionally closed until the Commission has confirmed that Turkey has fully implemented its commitments with respect to the Additional Protocol.

4. The Commission will inform the Council on any progress on the issues covered by the declaration of 21 September 2005 in its annual progress reports.

5. Given the progress achieved, work should now focus on completing the screening process. Such chapters for which the technical preparations have been completed should continue to be opened, in line with the Negotiating Framework.

6. The Commission underlines the importance of the resumption of a process leading rapidly to fully-fledged negotiations in 2007 under UN auspices on a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus issue.
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1933

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-Pyrimidinetrione, 5-

[(2,3-dihydro-6-methyl-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)azo].

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 3, 1998

Mr. ROTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-

Pyrimidinetrione, 5-[(2,3-dihydro-6-methyl-2-oxo-1Hbenzimidazol-5-yl)azo].

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:
2

•S 1933 IS

‘‘ 9902.32.09 2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-

Pyrimidinetrione, 5-[(2,3-

dihydro-6-methyl-2-oxo-1Hbenzimidazol-5-yl)azo] (CAS

No. 72102–84–2) (provided

for in subheading

3204.17.60) ........................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2001 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies to articles entered, or withdrawn from

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

4 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 257 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 257 Filed 06/28/18 Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT,

Plaintiff

CENTRAL SAN JOAQUIN WATER 

CONSERVATION DISTRICT,

Plaintiff-Appellant

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, STOCKTON CITY, 

CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY,

Plaintiffs

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2017-2431

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:04-cv-00541-EDK, Judge Elaine Kaplan.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ROGER J. MARZULLA, Marzulla Law, LLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented 

by NANCIE GAIL MARZULLA. 
 JIMMY MCBIRNEY, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice,

Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also 

represented by ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR., BRIAN A.

MIZOGUCHI, JOSEPH H. HUNT. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

 December 17, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court