alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 10, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Dynamic Spectrum Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Apple, Cupertino, CA, and Strathmore University, Nairobi, KENYA have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Dynamic Spectrum Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On September 1, 2020, Dynamic Spectrum Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 18, 2020 (85 FR 58390).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 4, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 25, 2021 (86 FR 28150).                

Suzanne Morris, 

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2021-18264 Filed 8-24-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00762-MA Document 26 Filed 09/15/16 Page 11 of 11
Kathryn Tassinari 

Brent Wells 

kathrynt50@comcast.net 

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. 

474 Willamette, Suite 200 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 686-1969 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

ROBERT L. CANFIELD, ) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

vs. ) 

) 

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ) 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

Case No. 6:15-cv-00846-MC 

ORDER APPROVING PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES 

PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. §406(b) 

After considering Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees, and counsel for Defendant having 

no objection, Order is hereby granted in the sum of $23,198.00 for attorney fees pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. §406(b), payable to HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C., 474 Willamette, 

Suite 200, Eugene, OR 97401. The Commissioner shall deduct from this amount an 

administrative assessment under 42 U.S.C. §406( d) and pay Plaintiffs coun~el the balance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this_/_ day of fipn I, 2019. 

, lUnited States District Judge/Magistrate 

PRESENTED BY: 

Kathryn Tassinari 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ORDER APPROVING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES UNDER TO 42 U.S.C.§406(b) - 1
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1677

AN ACT

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation

Act and the Partnerships for Wildlife Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wetlands and Wildlife

5 Enhancement Act of 1998’’.
2

S 1677 ES

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NORTH AMERICAN

2 WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT.

3 Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Con4 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking

5 ‘‘not to exceed’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘not

6 to exceed $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1999

7 through 2003.’’.

8 SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF PARTNERSHIPS FOR

9 WILDLIFE ACT.

10 Section 7105(h) of the Partnerships for Wildlife Act

11 (16 U.S.C. 3744(h)) is amended by striking ‘‘for each of

12 fiscal years’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘not to ex13 ceed $6,250,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 through

14 2003.’’.

15 SEC. 4. MEMBERSHIP OF THE NORTH AMERICAN WET16 LANDS CONSERVATION COUNCIL.

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section

18 4(a)(1)(D) of the North American Wetlands Conservation

19 Act (16 U.S.C. 4403(a)(1)(D)), during the period of 1999

20 through 2002, the membership of the North American

21 Wetlands Conservation Council under section 4(a)(1)(D)

22 of that Act shall consist of—

23 (1) 1 individual who shall be the Group Man24 ager for Conservation Programs of Ducks Unlimited,

25 Inc. and who shall serve for 1 term of 3 years begin26 ning in 1999; and
3

S 1677 ES

1 (2) 2 individuals who shall be appointed by the

2 Secretary of the Interior in accordance with section

3 4 of that Act and who shall each represent a dif4 ferent organization described in section 4(a)(1)(D)

5 of that Act.

6 (b) PUBLICATION OF POLICY.—Not later than June

7 30, 1999, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in

8 the Federal Register, after notice and opportunity for pub9 lic comment, a policy for making appointments under sec10 tion 4(a)(1)(D) of the North American Wetlands Con11 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 4403(a)(1)(D)).

Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day,

September 29), 1998.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1677

AN ACT

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands ConAct. servation Act and the Partnerships for Wildlife
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models
                        What Are Crop Simulation Models?
                                    2DSoil Model
                                    Spudsim (Potato) Model
                                    CLASSIM
                    Controlled Environment FacilitiesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory People





- Contact Information

Serhan  Yesilkoy    Visiting Scientist /ARSUserFiles/57842/Yesilkoy.JPG RESEARCH INTERESTS I am currently working on the rice modeling of extreme climatic conditions and different management practices for climate resilience. My other research experience is to: 1) Investigate the spatiotemporal changes in compound hydroclimatic extremes under different climate projections, 2) Measure and quantify CO2 and H2O fluxes over agroecosystems using Eddy Covariance method, 3) Calculate the changes in crop water footprint for sustainable agriculture under climate projections, 4) Better understand the crop growth simulation models to maximize the crop yield in the agroclimatic zones, 5) Create web-based information systems for the environmental solutions.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1677 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1677

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act and the 
                     Partnerships for Wildlife Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wetlands and Wildlife Enhancement 
Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NORTH AMERICAN WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT.

    Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking ``not to exceed'' and all that 
follows and inserting ``not to exceed $30,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 1999 through 2003.''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF PARTNERSHIPS FOR WILDLIFE ACT.

    Section 7105(h) of the Partnerships for Wildlife Act (16 U.S.C. 
3744(h)) is amended by striking ``for each of fiscal years'' and all 
that follows and inserting ``not to exceed $6,250,000 for each of 
fiscal years 1999 through 2003.''.

SEC. 4. MEMBERSHIP OF THE NORTH AMERICAN WETLANDS CONSERVATION COUNCIL.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 4(a)(1)(D) of the North 
American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4403(a)(1)(D)), during 
the period of 1999 through 2002, the membership of the North American 
Wetlands Conservation Council under section 4(a)(1)(D) of that Act 
shall consist of--
            (1) 1 individual who shall be the Group Manager for 
        Conservation Programs of Ducks Unlimited, Inc. and who shall 
        serve for 1 term of 3 years beginning in 1999; and
            (2) 2 individuals who shall be appointed by the Secretary 
        of the Interior in accordance with section 4 of that Act and 
        who shall each represent a different organization described in 
        section 4(a)(1)(D) of that Act.
    (b) Publication of Policy.--Not later than June 30, 1999, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register, after 
notice and opportunity for public comment, a policy for making 
appointments under section 4(a)(1)(D) of the North American Wetlands 
Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4403(a)(1)(D)).

            Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day, September 
      29), 1998.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1677

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act and the 
                     Partnerships for Wildlife Act.
```
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patriot Bank Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
change Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Elko, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ RICHARD A. ELKO
--------------------------
Richard A. Elko
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002
SCHEDULE 3.1.1


Consumer and             Consommation             FORM 4    FORMULE 4
Corporate Affairs        et Corporations
Canada                   Canada

Canada Business              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT          CLAUSES
Corporations Act                                         MODIFICATRICES
Loi sur les socits
commerciales canadiennes      (SECTION 27 OR 171)      (ARTICLES 27 OU 171)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Name of Corporation -                   2-Corporation No. -
  Denomination de la societe                No de la societe

           Repap Enterprises Inc.
         Les Enterprises Repap Inc.                      057881-9
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

3-The articles of the above named            Les statuts de la societe
  corporation are amended as follows:        ci-haut mentionnee sont
                                             modifies de la facon suivante:




RESOLVED as a special resolution that the articles of the Corporation are hereby
amended to change the place in Canada where the registered office is to be
situated from the Montreal Urban Community in the province of Quebec to the City
of Miramichi in the province of New Brunswick.





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date            Signature              Description of Office -
                                       Description du poste
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY              A L'USAGE DU MINISTERE SEULEMENT

                                       -------------------------------------




                                       1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Research: Baton Rouge, LA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Quick Links
                        Varroa Sensitive Hygiene (VSH)
                                    Russian Honey Bees
                                    Measuring Varroa Mite Population
                                    Small Hive Beetles
                                    Tracheal Mite Resistance
                                    History of the Bee LabSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Baton Rouge, Louisiana Honey Bee Lab People & Locations







Melissa  Fontaine
                        Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Lab Technician (Insects)
                        Phone: (225) 767-9280
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
(8 App. Div. 315)

#### JAFFRAY et al. v. HUNTER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 31, 1896.)

Practice in Civil Cases—Stay Pending Action in Another State.

An action brought in New York will not be stayed on the ground that the same matter is in litigation between the same parties in another state, where it appears that the action was begun in such other state to forestall the action in New York, and to compel plaintiffs, who were receivers appointed by the courts of New York, to litigate in a foreign jurisdiction.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by Howard S. Jaffray and others, as receivers of E. S. Jaffray & Co., against Edward Hunter, on two promissory notes of defendant, for $2,500 each, payable to plaintiffs. From an order denying a motion to stay proceedings until the determination of an equity suit brought by defendant against plaintiffs and others, in the state of Tennessee, to restrain the collection of said notes, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before BARRETT, RUMSEY, PATTERSON, and INGRAHAM, JJ.

S. L. Samuels, for appellant.

David Willcox, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

It is altogether within, the discretion of the court to stay proceedings in an action here, when the same subject-matter is in litigation between the same parties in the courts of another state or country. Many cases may arise in which that course should be pursued, particularly where the foreign court first acquired jurisdiction. But in this- case no sufficient or satisfactory reason was given for staying the common-law action here until the suit in equity can be disposed of in Tennessee. The two notes sued oh were given by the defendant directly to the plaintiffs, as receivers, and they formed part of the consideration paid on the settlement of transactions had between the defendant and. the receivers of the co-partnership of Jaffray & Co. The suit in Tennessee was brought in anticipation of the maturity of those notes, and upon allegations of the failure of consideration. That it was begun to forestall action here, and to compel the officers of this court to litigate in a foreign jurisdiction, seems obvious. What is alleged as constituting a cause of action in the Tennessee suit, to entitle the defendant to a decree for cancellation and surrender of the notes' which were sent by the plaintiffs to that state for collection, would furnish, if true, a complete defense to the action pending here, and no adequate reason is shown why this action should not proceed. That is especially true in view of the delay of the defendant in making this motion. Issue was joined in this cause in April last. It was set down for trial as a preferred cause on June 11th. This motion was then made, and the trial is now fixed for the first day of the term after the summer vacation. It is to the interest of the receivership and of the creditors that the question of the liability *933of the defendant should be determined speedily. He has answered in the cause, and it is ready for trial. The court below was right in refusing to stay the trial, and the order is affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward R. DeJesus, Appellant.

[947 NYS2d 216]

McCarthy, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Cawley, J.), rendered March 4, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal contempt in the first degree.

Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging him with criminal contempt in the first degree for violating an order of protection. County Court sentenced him to nine months in jail. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Inasmuch as the record before us does not indicate that defendant moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, his challenge to the voluntariness of his plea has not been preserved for our review and defendant made no statements that would implicate the narrow exception to the preservation requirement *(see People v Stewart,*92 AD3d 1146, 1147 [2012]; *People v Teele,*92 AD3d 972, 972 [2012]). In any event, County Court engaged in a lengthy, detailed colloquy with defendant regarding the rights he was relinquishing and the possible consequences of his plea, including deportation. Likewise, defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, to the extent that it impacted the voluntariness of his plea, is unpreserved by the lack of evidence in the record that he has moved to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v Carpenter,*93 AD3d 950, 952 [2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 863 [2012]; *People v Benson,*87 AD3d 1228, 1228-1229 [2011]). Notwithstanding, his claim that counsel pressured him into pleading guilty without adequately exploring potential de*1296fenses involves matters outside the record and is, therefore, more appropriately the subject of a CPL article 440 motion *(see People v Davis,*84 AD3d 1645, 1646 n [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 815 [2011]; *People v Pendelton,*81 AD3d 1037, 1038-1039 [2011], *lv denied*16 NY3d 898 [2011]). Defendant’s remaining contention, that his sentence was harsh and excessive, has been examined and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Kavanagh, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.