alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1992

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the $500,000

exclusion of gain on the sale of a principal residence shall apply to

certain sales by a surviving spouse.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 27, 1998

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the $500,000 exclusion of gain on the sale of a

principal residence shall apply to certain sales by a surviving spouse.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Surviving Spouse Fair5 ness Act of 1998’’.
2

S 1992 IS

1 SEC. 2. $500,000 EXCLUSION OF GAIN ON SALE OF PRIN2 CIPAL RESIDENCE BY SURVIVING SPOUSE.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 121(d)

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to property

5 of deceased spouse) is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(2) PROPERTY OF DECEASED SPOUSE.—For

7 purposes of this section, in the case of an unmarried

8 individual whose spouse is deceased on the date of

9 the sale or exchange of property—

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The period such un11 married individual owned and used such prop12 erty shall include the period such deceased

13 spouse owned and used such property before

14 death.

15 ‘‘(B) $500,000 EXCLUSION IN CERTAIN

16 CASES.—At the election of such an unmarried

17 individual with respect to any property, sub18 section (b)(1) shall be applied by substituting

19 ‘$500,000’ for ‘$250,000’ if—

20 ‘‘(i) such individual is an unmarried

21 individual at all times after the date of

22 death of such deceased spouse and before

23 the date of the sale or exchange, and

24 ‘‘(ii) the requirements of subpara25 graphs (B), (C), and (D) of subsection

26 (b)(2) would have been met if such sale or
3

S 1992 IS

1 exchange occurred on such date of death

2 (whether or not such requirements were in

3 effect as of such date of death).

4 In the case of property with respect to which an

5 election under this subparagraph is in effect,

6 the basis of such property in the hands of such

7 unmarried individual shall be determined with8 out regard to section 1014.

9 ‘‘(C) ELECTION.—The election under sub10 paragraph (B) shall be made not later than the

11 due date (including extensions) for the return

12 of tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable

13 year in which the sale occurred. Such an elec14 tion, once made, shall take effect as of such

15 date of death and may not be revoked without

16 the consent of the Secretary.’’

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

18 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend19 ments made by section 312 of the Taxpayer Relief Act

20 of 1997.

Æ
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2079

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to replace the dependent

care credit for children age 5 and under with an increase in the amount

of the child tax credit for such children.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 14 (legislative day, MAY 13), 1998

Mr. SMITH of Oregon (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. ABRAHAM,

Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. HUTCHINSON) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to replace

the dependent care credit for children age 5 and under

with an increase in the amount of the child tax credit

for such children.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF DEPENDENT CARE CREDIT

4 FOR CHILDREN UNDER AGE 6 WITH IN5 CREASE IN CHILD TAX CREDIT.

6 (a) INCREASE IN CHILD TAX CREDIT.—Subsection

7 (a) of section 24 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

8 (relating to child tax credit) is amended by striking ‘‘an
2

•S 2079 IS

1 amount equal to $500’’ and all that follows through the

2 period and inserting the following: ‘‘an amount equal to—

3 ‘‘(1) $1,500 in the case of a qualifying child

4 who is 5 years of age or less, and

5 ‘‘(2) $500 in the case of all other qualifying

6 children.’’.

7 (b) COORDINATION OF DEPENDENT CARE CREDIT.—

8 Section 21 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

9 to expenses for household and dependent care services nec10 essary for gainful employment) is amended by inserting

11 ‘‘over the age of 5 and’’ before ‘‘under the age of 13’’

12 each place it appears in subsections (b)(1)(A) and

13 (e)(5)(B).

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

16 December 31, 1998.

Æ
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1944

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals used in the formulation

of anti-cancer drugs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 3, 1998

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals used

in the formulation of anti-cancer drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:
2

•S 1944 IS

‘‘ 9902.32.25 (S)-N-[[5-[2-(2-

amino-4,6,7,8-

tetrahydro-4-oxo1H-pyrimido[5,4-

b][1,4]thiazin-6-

yl)ethyl]-2-

thienyl]carbonyl]-

L-glutamic acid

(CAS No.

177575–17–6)

(provided for in

subheading

2934.90.90) ......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/1999 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-14,760-13

IN RE ABNER LEONARD WASHINGTON, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1487552 IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed a motion to represent himself

at trial and a motion to dismiss counsel and that Respondent, the Judge of the 182nd District Court

of Harris County, has not considered and ruled on these motions.

Respondent shall file a response with this Court and state whether Relator has properly filed

these motions. If these motions were properly filed, Respondent shall state when theywere filed and

whether she has ruled on them. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held

in abeyance until Respondent has submitted her response. It shall be submitted within 30 days of

the date of this order. 
2

Filed: July 27, 2016

Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Infinity, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;    and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.     /s/ James A. Tuell           James A. Tuell *Executive Vice President, Principal Financial* *and Accounting Officer*March 30, 2005     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Infinity, Inc. and will beretained by Infinity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President
and Chief Executive Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Peter L Vosotas                  
|Peter L. Vosotas                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|Dated: August 11, 2008
1- NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

21184-0109/128583507.1

Perkins Coie LLP

1120 N.W. Couch Street, Tenth Floor

Portland, OR 97209-4128

Phone: 503.727.2000

Fax: 503.727.2222

Stephen M. Feldman, OSB No. 932674

SFeldman@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

1120 N.W. Couch Street, Tenth Floor

Portland, OR 97209-4128

Telephone: 503.727.2000

Facsimile: 503.727.2222

R. Charles Henn Jr. (admitted pro hac vice)

chenn@kilpatricktownsend.com

Charles H. Hooker III (admitted pro hac vice)

chooker@kilpatricktownsend.com

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: 404.815.6500

Facsimile: 404.815.6555

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; and ADIDAS AG, a foreign 

entity, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

FOREVER 21, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; and CENTRAL MILLS, 

INC., a New York corporation,

Defendants.

No. 3:15-cv-01559-SI 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:15-cv-01559-SI Document 14 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 2
2- NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

21184-0109/128583507.1

Perkins Coie LLP

1120 N.W. Couch Street, Tenth Floor

Portland, OR 97209-4128

Phone: 503.727.2000

Fax: 503.727.2222

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), plaintiffs hereby 

voluntarily dismiss this action with prejudice and without costs or other award to any party. 

Defendants have yet to serve plaintiffs with an answer or with a motion for summary judgment. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), plaintiffs may dismiss this action 

without order of the Court, by the filing of this Notice.

DATED: November 10, 2015 PERKINS COIE LLP

By: s/ Stephen M. Feldman

Stephen M. Feldman, OSB No. 932674

SFeldman@perkinscoie.com

1120 N.W. Couch Street, Tenth Floor

Portland, OR 97209-4128

Telephone: 503.727.2000

Facsimile: 503.727.2222

R. Charles Henn Jr. (admitted pro hac vice)

chenn@kilpatricktownsend.com

Charles H. Hooker III (admitted pro hac vice)

chooker@kilpatricktownsend.com

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: 404.815.6500

Facsimile: 404.815.6555

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 3:15-cv-01559-SI Document 14 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2012

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Gainsville,

Florida, as the ‘‘Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical

Center’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 30, 1998

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. MACK) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center

in Gainsville, Florida, as the ‘‘Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

4 AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, GAINESVILLE,

5 FLORIDA.

6 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center

7 in Gainesville, Florida, shall be known and designated as
2

•S 2012 IS

1 the ‘‘Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs

2 Medical Center’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Traffix Inc and
Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statement as presented in the Company's Form
10Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                        JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                                  4,074,486
<SECURITIES>                                           37,455,719
<RECEIVABLES>                                           7,522,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       51,856,587
<PP&E>                                                  1,242,739
<DEPRECIATION>                                            715,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         53,734,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  10,407,865
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                   15,864
<OTHER-SE>                                             43,326,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           53,734,318
<SALES>                                                 8,174,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        8,174,735
<CGS>                                                   2,252,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           2,252,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        3,828,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         2,616,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,055,151
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     1,561,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                            1,561,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0.11


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Salinas, California
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Ruben  Gill
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Office Automation Assistant
                        Phone: (831) 755-2833
                        
                        
                        Fax: (831) 755-2814(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0960. UDIGG MUSIC GROUP, LLC v. HOME LYNX, LLC.

In this civil action, plaintiff UDIGG Music Group, LLC (“UDIGG”) filed this

direct appeal from a trial court order denying its petition to set aside portions of an

arbitration award and granting defendant Home Lynx, LLC’s counterclaimto confirm

the arbitration award. We lack jurisdiction.

“[T]his Court has no jurisdiction to consider an appeal taken from a reviewing

court’s order confirming an arbitration award; rather, upon entry of the court’s order

confirming the award, a separate judgment must also be entered by the reviewing

court, and this Court hasjurisdiction to consider an appeal taken fromthe judgment.”

Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Jones, 333 Ga. App. 184, 184 (1) (775 SE2d 714)

(2015) (citing OCGA §§ 5-6-34 (a), 9-9-15, and 9-9-16.); see also McFarland v.

Roberts, 335 Ga. App. 40, 47 (1), n. 4 (778 SE2d 349) (2015) (“An order simply

confirming an arbitration award is not a final, appealable judgment . . . .”). Although

the confirmation order and judgment may be entered on the same document, see

Green Tree Servicing, LLC, 333 Ga. App. at 185 (1), the trial court here did not enter

a final judgment in the order confirming the arbitration award, and no final judgment

appears in the record.

Where no final judgment has been entered, parties are required to follow the

interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate

review from the trial court – to appeal the order confirming the arbitration award. See

OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989).

February 23, 2021
UDIGG’s failure to do so here deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is

hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/23/2021
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 31, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; revised notice of open 
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules will hold a virtual 
meeting on September 14, 2021 rather than meeting in person. The 
meeting is open to the public. When a meeting is held virtually, 
members of the public may join by telephone or video conference to 
observe but not participate. An agenda and supporting materials will be 
posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-and-archives-rules-committees/agenda-books. The announcement for this meeting was previously 
published in the Federal Register on June 28, 2021.

DATES: September 14, 2021, 10 a.m. (Eastern).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Myers, Esq., Acting Chief 
Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. 
Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus 
Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#792b0c151c0a3a161414100d0d1c1c262a1c1a0b1c0d180b00391816570c0a1a160c0b0d0a571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d6f4851584e7e5250505449495858626e585e4f58495c4f447d5c5213484e5e52484f494e135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

    Dated: August 25, 2021.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2021-18693 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
May 28 , 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHAD SMALL , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00654

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on July 10, 2014 . Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### BATES v. TARTT.

(Decided May 1, 1913.)

Appeal from Sumter Chancery Court.

Heard before Hon. Thomas H. Smith.

Harsh, Beddow & Fitts, for appellant.

J. A. Mitci-iell, and A. G. & E. D. Smith, for appellee

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.