alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Sam Kraynek, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;



5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2005
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ Sam Kraynek                     
|                      |  | Sam Kraynek, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1










EXHIBIT 10.1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

CHRISTOPHER KLING,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-01643-KI

JUDGMENT

Merrill Schneider

Schneider Kerr Law Offices

P.O. Box 14490

Portland, OR 97293

Attorney for Plaintiff

Billy J. Williams

United States Attorney

District of Oregon

Page 1 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:15-cv-01643-KI Document 22 Filed 09/13/16 Page 1 of 2
Janice E. Hebert

Assistant United States Attorney

1000 SW Third Ave., Ste. 600

Portland, OR 97204-2902

Thomas M. Elsberry

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

701 Fifth Ave., Ste. 2900 M/S 221A

Seattle, WA 98104-7075

Attorneys for Defendant

KING, Judge:

The decision of the Commissioner is reversed. This action is remanded to the

Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 13th day of September, 2016. 

 /s/ Garr M. King 

Garr M. King

United States District Judge

PAGE 2 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:15-cv-01643-KI Document 22 Filed 09/13/16 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-51211 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROY LEE JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-191-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Roy Lee Jones has filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jones has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief, Jones’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Jones’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.
#### Alan Fong et al., Respondents, v Town of Montgomery et al., Appellants.

[942 NYS2d 368]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bartlett, J.), dated *947April 15, 2011, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, as they failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). The defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of establishing the applicability of the so-called “rules of the road” exemption contained in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 (b) for emergency vehicles responding to a bona fide emergency and, therefore, were not entitled to the application of the “reckless disregard” standard of care (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 [b]; *see Hofmann v Town of Ashford,*60 AD3d 1498 [2009]; *Davis v Incorporated Vil. of Babylon, N.Y.,*13 AD3d 331 [2004]; *Marvin v Town of Middlesex,*2002 NY Slip Op 50006[U] [2002], *affd*300 AD2d 1112 [2002]; *cf. Riley v County of Broome,*95 NY2d 455 [2000]). Dillon, J.P., Ajigiolillo, Belen and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.5 


 


SECOND AMENDMENT


TO


PATRIOT TRANSPORTATION HOLDING, INC.


2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Patriot
Transportation Holding, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc. 2014 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
issued an extraordinary dividend to its shareholders of $3.00 per share, which was paid on January 30, 2020 to shareholders of
record as of the close of business on January 15, 2020 (the “Dividend”); and


 


WHEREAS, Section
11 of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) will adjust Awards granted
under the Plan and the maximum number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan set forth in Section 4 of the Plan in the event
of any extraordinary dividend, stock split, extraordinary corporate transaction or other relevant change in capitalization to the
extent necessary to preserve the economic intent of such Awards; and


 


WHEREAS, in connection
with the Dividend, the Board made adjustments to certain Awards made under the Plan, as required under Section 11;


 


WHEREAS, in connection
with the foregoing, the Board desires to amend Section 4 of the Plan to authorize an additional 148,877 shares of Common Stock
to be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan;


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended effective as of May 8, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), as follows:


 


		1.	Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby replaced in its entirety by the
following:



 


		4.1	Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11, a total of 689,877
shares of Common Stock shall be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan; provided that, no more than 50,000 shares
of Common Stock may be granted as Incentive Stock Options. During the terms of the Awards, the Company shall keep available at
all times the number of shares of Common Stock required to satisfy such Awards.



 


 


		2.	Except as specifically amended herein, the terms of the Plan shall
continue in full force and effect.



 


[Remainder of page intentionally
blank]




    	1 



    	 



    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer, effective as of the Effective Date.


 


 


PATRIOT TRANSPORTATION HOLDING,
INC.






By: /s/ Robert E. Sandlin


Robert E. Sandlin


President & Chief Executive
Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Ryan  Fitzgerald
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Painter
                        Phone: (515) 357-7461
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### VAN HOUTEN v. PYE.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Action by Orpha D. Van Houten against Isaac E. Pye.

Garrett Z. Snider, for appellant.

Frank Comesky, for respondent.

DYKMAN, J.

This case was before us at a prior term of this court upon an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant. 33 N. Y. Supp. 838. We reversed that judgment, and laid down the law which was to control the case so far as this court is concerned. As we adhere to the opinion delivered at that time, it is unnecessary to re-examine the case now. The trial court followed our decision, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial on the minutes of the court should be affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Judy Bruner, certify that:





1.      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of SanDisk Corporation for the quarter ended October 3, 2010; and





2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: September 8, 2011
/s/ Judy BrunerJudy Bruner

Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 18.1

                             (ARTHUR ANDERSEN LETTERHEAD)



February 26, 1997



Genmar Holdings, Inc.
100 South Fifth Street
Suite 2400
Minneapolis, MN  55402

    Re:  Form 10-K Report for the Year Ended December 31, 1996

Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

As of December 1, 1996, the Company changed from the completed contract method
of accounting for long-term construction contracts to the percentage of
completion method.  According to the management of the Company, this change was
made to more accurately reflect periodic recognition of income and costs on
certain custom yachts sold directly to consumers under contract.  Such
contracts normally include significant progress payments and the final
completion of the yacht typically is subject to a variety of customer
enhancement requests.

ACCOUNTING RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 45: LONG-TERM CONSTRUCTION-TYPE CONTRACTS
states that when estimates of costs to complete and extent of progress towards
completion of long-term contracts is reasonably dependable, the
percentage-of-completion method is preferable.  As such, we are of the opinion
that the Company's change in method of accounting is preferable.

Very truly yours,



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                                          56
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agroclimate and Hydraulics Research Unit: El Reno, OK
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Explore
                        History
                                    Outreach/Education
                                    Visitor Information
                                    Media
                    Other Research Topics
                        Standard Embankment Design
                                    Dam Rehabilitation
                                    Site Specific Models
                                    Cloud Based Technology
                                    Decision Support Technology
                                    CEAP
                                    LTARSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Docs from HERUheadline bar Docs


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 159 (Friday, August 20, 2021)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 46757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18062]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 159 / Friday, August 20, 2021 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 46757]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2021-11 of August 16, 
                2021

                
Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and 
                Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (22 U.S.C. 2601(c)(1)) 
                (MRAA), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) 
                of the MRAA, that it is important to the national 
                interest to furnish assistance under the MRAA in an 
                amount not to exceed $500 million from the United 
                States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund 
                for the purpose of meeting unexpected urgent refugee 
                and migration needs of refugees, victims of conflict, 
                and other persons at risk as a result of the situation 
                in Afghanistan, including applicants for Special 
                Immigrant Visas. Such assistance may be provided on a 
                bilateral or multilateral basis as appropriate, 
                including through contributions to international 
                organizations and through funding to other 
                nongovernmental organizations, governments, and United 
                States departments and agencies.

                You are authorized and directed to submit this 
                determination to the Congress, along with the 
                accompanying Justification, and to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, August 17, 2021

[FR Doc. 2021-18062
Filed 8-19-21; 8:45 am]
Billing code 9111-23-P
#### In the Matter of Edgar Mitcham, Appellant, v Marie Mitcham, Respondent.

— In a proceeding for a downward modification of previously ordered support payments, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Facelle, J.), dated October 19, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding for failure to prosecute.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Pursuant to a consent order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered March 15, 1983, the husband was directed to pay the sum of $290 per week for the support of his wife and two children and one half the cost of the children’s orthodontic bills. By petition dated May 2, 1984, the husband applied for a downward modification of the support amount based upon a change in circumstances, that is, his subsequent unemployment and the wife’s substantially increased income. By order dated June 5, 1984, the matter was referred to a Hearing Officer. Based upon the husband’s nonappearance at the hearing, the order under review dismissed his petition for failure to prosecute. As no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the aggrieved party *(see,*CPLR 5511), this appeal must, therefore, be dismissed. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.