### F I LE D U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E LEVE NTH CI RCUI T June 10, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN C L E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 04- 14663 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 4 - 2 0 0 9 9 - C R - J AL U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s J O S U E D I A Z , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju n e 10, 2005) B efo re H U L L , W IL S O N an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: J os ue D i a z appe a l s hi s 18- m onth pr i s on s e nt e nc e f orpos s e s s i on w i th i nt e nt2

to d is tr ib u te c o c a in e , a v io la tio n o f 2 1 U .S .C . s e c tio n 8 4 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) , a n d 6 0 - m o n th pr i s on s e nt e nc e f

orc a rry i ng a f

i r e a r m dur i ng a drug- tr a f f i c ki ng of f e ns e , a vi ol a t i on o f 1 8 U .S .C . s e c tio n 9 2 4 ( c ) ( 1 ) ( A ) . D ia z a r g u e s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t v io la te d h is F if th a n d S ix th A m e n d m e n t r ig h ts , u n d e rU n ite d S ta te s v . B o o k e r , 5 4 2 U .S . — , 125 S . C t . 738 ( 2005) , w he n i ts e nt e nc e d hi m ba s e d on a drug qua nt i ty tha tw a s not adm i tt ed by D i az , foun d b y aj ury, or cont ai ned i n the i nd i ctm ent . D i az al so ar gu es tha tthe di s tr i c tc our te rr e d w he n i ts e nt e nc e d hi m unde ra m a nda t ory S e nt e nc i ng G ui del i nes r egi m e. B ec ause D i az adm i tt ed the drug qu ant i ty duri ng hi s pl ea c ol l oquy a nd hi s s e nt e nc e w a s w i thi n the s t a tut ory m a xi m um c ha r ge d i n the i ndi c tm e nt , the di s tr i c tc our tdi d notvi ol a t e D i a z ’ s c ons t i tut i ona l r i ght s . T he gove rnm e ntc onc e de s , how e ve r , tha tthe di s tr i c tc our tdi d c om m i ts t a tut ory e rr or w he n i ts e nt e nc e d D i a z unde rm a nda t ory G ui de l i ne s , a nd w e r e m a nd f or r e s e nt e nc i ng. B e c a u s e D ia z r a is e d a B la k e ly a r g u m e n t in th e d is tr ic t c o u r t, w e r e v ie w h is s e nt e nc e de novo a nd w i l l r e ve r s e f orha r m f ul e rr or . U ni t e d S t a t e s v. P a z , 405 F . 3d 9 4 6 , 9 4 8 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . D ia z p le a d e d g u ilty to c o c a in e p o s s e s s io n w ith in te n t to di s tr i but e . D ur i ng hi s pl e a c ol l oquy , the gove rnm e nts pe c i f i e d tha ti tw oul d ha ve pr ove d a ttr i a l tha tD i a z s ol d a gove rnm e nta ge ntc oc a i ne on tw o oc c a s i ons , a nd tha tthe t ot a l qua nt i ty of c oc a i ne f

r om both s a l e s w a s 110. 8 gr a m s . A f t e rthe3

g o v e rn m e n t c o n c lu d e d its s u m m a ry o f th e f a c ts , th e d is tr ic t c o u r t a s k e d D ia z if w h a t th e g o v e rn m e n t s ta te d w a s c o rr e c t, a n d D ia z r e s p o n d e d in th e a f f ir m a tiv e . B ec au se D iaz a d m itted th e d ru g q u an ti ty, th e d istrict co u rt d id n o t v io late D iaz’s S i xth A m e ndm e nta r gum e ntr i ght s . U ni t e d S t a t e s v. S he l t on, 400 F . 3d 1325, 1330 (11th C i r. 20 05 ). D ia z a ls o a r g u e s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t v io la te d h is F if th A m e n d m e n t r ig h ts b y s e n te n c in g h im b e y o n d th e s ta tu to ry m a x im u m b a s e d o n d ru g q u a n tity u n s p e c if ie d in th e in d ic tm e n t. I n U n ite d S ta te s v . C o tto n , th e S u p r e m e C o u r t h e ld thatthe enhancem entof a s ent ence abov e the st atut ory m axi m um on the basi s of a f a c tnota l l e ge d i n the i ndi c tm e ntvi ol a t e s the F i f th A m e ndm e nt . 535 U . S . 625, 63 2, 12 2 S . C t17 81 , 17 85 (200 2). T he st atut ory m axi m um i s f ou nd i n the U ni t ed S t at es C od e, U ni t ed S t at es v. D un ca n, 40 0 F . 3d 12 97 , 13 03 -04 (11 th C i r. 20 05 ), and D i az ’ s 18-m on th sent ence for c ocai ne po ss es si on w as w el l w i thi n the 20 -y ea r st atut ory m axi m um of 21 U . S . C . se ct i on 84 1(b)(1)(C). B ec ause the di stri ctcourt d id n o t s e n te n c e D ia z b e y o n d th e s ta tu to ry m a x im u m , it d id n o t c o m m it F if th A m e n d m e n t e rr o r . T he di s tr i c tc our te rr e d, how e ve r , w he n i ts e nt e nc e d D i a z unde rthe m a nda t ory G ui de l i ne s tha tthe S upr e m e C our the l d t o be a dvi s ory i n B ooke r . T he go vernm entconcedes thi s s t atut ory e rr or and thati tca nn otshow thatthe error w as4

ha r m l e s s . W e , the r e f

or e , va c a t e D i a z ’ s s e nt e nc e a nd r e m a nd f orr e s e nt e nc i ng. V AC AT E D a nd RE MAND E D.