alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Processing and Sensory Quality Research: New Orleans, LA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area New Orleans, Louisiana Southern Regional Research Center Food Processing and Sensory Quality Research People & Locations







Rebecca  Dupre
                        Food Processing and Sensory Quality Research

                        




                        
                        RESEARCH CHEMIST
                        Phone: (504) 286-4465
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### PEOPLE v. SOLOMON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 18, 1896.)

Larceny—Defenses.

It is not a defense to a prosecution for theft of money collected by defendant for his employer that he retained the money as an offset against previous deductions from his salary, where there was no understanding between the parties authorizing him to do so. .

*574Appeal from court of special sessions, New York county.

Michael Solomon was convicted of petit larceny, and appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and BARRETT, RUMSEY, WILLIAMS, and PATTERSON, JJ.

Arthur C. Palmer, for appellant.

John D. Lindsay, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The offense of larceny was clearly made out upon the evidence in this case. The appellant now for the first time makes the claim that he was entitled to use the money which he should have paid over to his employer as an offset against deductions made from his salary on previous occasions. There was no sufficient or credible testimony to justify the court in finding that such deductions had been made. Even if there had been such testimony, there was no evidence of an agreement or understanding with regard thereto such as -would have warranted the defendant in retaining the sums which he collected for his employer. It is quite clear that this latter line of defense was an afterthought, brought up for the first time upon this appeal. It was not suggested below. The record clearly shows an intent on the part of this defendant to embezzle the money in question. When charged by his employer with the offense, he made no explanation, but told the latter, in substance, that he regretted that he had not taken other property belonging to him. His whole course shows a felonious intent

The judgment was right, and should be affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-4257

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

MICHAEL LEWIS WHITE, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. 

Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-cr-00224-BO-1) 

Submitted: January 5, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne M. 

Hayes, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Vacated by Supreme Court, October 4, 2010
PER CURIAM: 

 Michael Lewis White pleaded guilty to possession of a 

firearm after having previously been convicted of a crime 

punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006). White subsequently 

moved to withdraw his guilty plea and the district court denied 

his motion. The court sentenced White to 120 months of 

imprisonment and White now appeals. Finding no error, we 

affirm. 

 On appeal, White argues that the district court erred 

in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We review a 

district court’s denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea 

for abuse of discretion. United States v. Dyess, 478 F.3d 224, 

237 (4th Cir. 2007) (citation omitted). A defendant seeking to 

withdraw his guilty plea bears the burden of demonstrating that 

withdrawal should be granted. Id. 

 White argues that he was legally innocent of violating 

§ 922(g)(1) because his prior convictions for possession with 

intent to distribute cocaine, possession with intent to 

distribute marijuana, possession of cocaine, and possession of 

stolen property were not punishable by a term of imprisonment 

exceeding one year. While White’s argument is concededly 

foreclosed by United States v. Harp, 406 F.3d 242, 246-47 (4th 

Cir. 2005), he argues that the subsequent decisions in United 

2 
3 

States v. Rodriguez, 553 U.S. 337 (2008), and United States v. 

Pruitt, 545 F.3d 416 (6th Cir. 2008), have undermined this 

court’s holding in Harp. We have thoroughly reviewed the record 

and the relevant legal authorities and conclude that our holding 

in Harp is consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in 

Rodriguez. Further, to the extent Pruitt may be inconsistent 

with Harp, decisions by our sister circuits are simply not 

binding upon this court. 

 We therefore affirm the judgment of the district 

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0468 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0468

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (COM(2006)0500 - C6-0335/2006 - 2006/0172(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 314 E , 21/12/2006 P. 0065 - 0065 *

P6_TA(2006)0468

Rules for direct support schemes under the CAP and support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (COM(2006)0500 — C6-0335/2006 —2006/0172(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2006)0500) [1],

- having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0335/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A6-0377/2006),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
734 A.2d 390

#### Kimberly Jean TITLER v. STATE EMPLOYES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Appeal of Clyde M. Titler, Sr. and Clyde M. Titler, a/k/a Clyde M. Titler, Jr., Intervenors.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 21, 1999.

*439
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 1999, we vacate the Order of the Commonwealth Court, and we direct the Commonwealth Court to require the filing of an appropriate bond by Kimberly Jean Titler, in an amount determined by the Commonwealth Court, pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1531, and, after Ms. Titler has filed a bond, to enter a Preliminary Injunction staying distribution of Decedent George Titter’s State Employees’ Retirement System death benefits and to provide for all such other relief as granted in its Order dated October 22, 1998. We relinquish jurisdiction.
Alan Stuart Graf, OSB # 92317 

alangraf@aracnet.com 

208 Pine St 

Floyd, VA 24091 

Telephone: 540-745-2519 

Fax: 931-964-3127 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JESSI SCROGGINS 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

6: 15-CV-01338-MC 

ORDER FOR EAJA 

ATTORNEY FEES 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded 

attorney fees in the amount of $4,918.13. Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury 

Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 139 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), payment of this award 

shall be made payable to Plaintiffs attorney: 

Alan Stuart Graf, PC, 208 Pine St., Floyd VA 24091. 

It is so ORDERED 

Dated this ~ day of August, 2016 

\ 

United States District Judge 

Prepared as to form 

/s/ Alan Graf 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES-1 

Case 6:15-cv-01338-MC Document 26 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 1
Bruce W. Brewer, OSB No. 925581

brucebrewerusdccases@gmail.com

PO Box 421

West Linn, OR 97068

503-621-6633

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

VINCENT DAVIS, Case No. 3:15-cv-00843-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER (EAJA FEES)

vs.

COMMISSIONER,

of Social Security

Administration,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to the

Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an attorney fee in the amount of $6,500.00 is

awarded to Plaintiff. It is ordered that the aforementioned attorney fee will be paid to Plaintiff’s

attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against

the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130

S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 

1 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES

Case 3:15-cv-00843-SI Document 26 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 2
If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Bruce

Brewer, and mailed to him at PO Box 421, West Linn, OR 97068. If Plaintiff has such debt, then

the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to Plaintiff and

mailed to Plaintiff's attorney at his address stated above. There are no costs or expenses to be

paid herein.

DATED this _____ day of ______________________, 2016.

____________________________________

The Honorable Michael H. Simon

United States District Court Judge 

Submitted by:

Bruce W. Brewer, OSB No. 925581

503-621-6633, Attorney for Plaintiff 

2 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES

14th November

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Case 3:15-cv-00843-SI Document 26 Filed 11/14/16 Page 2 of 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Application Technology Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Departments
                        Agricultural Engineering
                                    Entomology
                                    Horticulture
                                    Plant Pathology
                                    IR-4 programSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Wooster, Ohio Application Technology Research People & Locations







Aaron  Yilmaz
                        Application Technology Research

                        




                        
                        Research Biologist
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 10.14


     Schedule of Executed Joint Venture Agreements
     By and Between Coverntry Corporation


Coventry Corporation a wholly-owned subsidary of Sterling House Corporation
has entered into the following agreements with Elderly Living, Limited
Partnership which vary only in the following material respects from Exhibit
10.13.

Project Entities                     Date Executed     Facility Location

Sherwood Development, L.L.C.         June 25, 1997    San Antonio-Whitby, TX
                                                      New Braunfels, TX

Glenwood Development, L.L.C.         June 25, 1997    Brighton, CO

Winchester Development, Limited      June 25, 1997    Piqua, OH
                                                      Sprindale, OH

Gladstone Development,               June 25, 1997    Port Charlotte, FL
Limited Partnership                                   Jacksonville, FL

Bristol Development,                 July 31, 1997    Ormond Beach, FL
Limited Partnership

Devon Development, Limited            July 31, 1997    Urbana, OH              
                                                      Washington Township, OH

Sheffield Development,               July 31, 1997    LeHigh Acres, FL
Limited Partnership                                   Venice, FL
II

Calendar No. 458

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2071

[Report No. 105–241]

To extend a quarterly financial report program administered by the Secretary

of Commerce.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 13, 1998

Mr. THOMPSON (for himself and Mr. GLENN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

JULY 8, 1998

Reported by Mr. THOMPSON, without amendment

A BILL

To extend a quarterly financial report program administered

by the Secretary of Commerce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RE4 PORT PROGRAM.

5 Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend

6 title 13, United States Code, to transfer responsibility for
2

S 2071 RS

1 the quarterly financial report from the Federal Trade

2 Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, and for other

3 purposes’’, approved January 12, 1983 (Public Law 97–

4 454; 13 U.S.C. 91 note), is amended by striking ‘‘Septem5 ber 30, 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2005’’.

Calendar No. 458

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2071

[Report No. 105–241]

A BILL

To extend a quarterly financial report program

administered by the Secretary of Commerce.

JULY 8, 1998

Reported without amendment
TREG R. TAYLOR

Attorney General of Alaska

Garrison A. Todd (AK Bar No. 2011097)

Assistant Attorney General

STATE OF ALASKA

DEPARTMENT OF LAW

1031 West Fourth Avenue, Suite 200

Anchorage, AK 99501

Telephone: (907) 269-5100

Facsimile: (907) 276-3697

Email: Garrison.Todd@alaska.gov

Counsel for Defendant-Intervenor 

State of Alaska

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

EUGENE DIVISION

KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, 

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 6:15-cv-01517-AA

STATE OF ALASKA'S 

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF 

COUNSEL

Pursuant to LR 83-11(d), the undersigned Garrison A. Todd, hereby enters

his appearance as counsel in this case for the State of Alaska, substituting for 

Nathan Haynes, who hereby withdraws as counsel of record.

Mr. Todd’s contact information is as follows:

Garrison A. Todd

Assistant Attorney General

Environmental Section

Case 6:15-cv-01517-AA Document 534 Filed 01/05/23 Page 1 of 4
Juliana, et al v. United States of America, et al Case No.: 6:15-cv-01517-AA

Notice of Substitute Counsel Page 2 of 4

Alaska Department of Law 

1031 W. 4th Ave., Suite 200 

Anchorage, AK 99501

Phone: (907) 269-5539

Email: Garrison.Todd@alaska.gov

Counsel is registered with the United State District Court for the District of

Oregon for electronic filing using the email address set forth above.

DATED: January 5, 2023.

TREG R. TAYLOR

Attorney General of Alaska

By: /s/Garrison A. Todd

Garrison A. Todd (AK Bar No. 2011097)

Assistant Attorney General

STATE OF ALASKA

DEPARTMENT OF LAW

1031 West Fourth Avenue, Suite 200

Anchorage, AK 99501

Phone: (907) 269-5100

Facsimile: (907) 276-3697

Email: Garrison.Todd@alaska.gov

Counsel for Defendant-Intervenor 

State of Alaska

Case 6:15-cv-01517-AA Document 534 Filed 01/05/23 Page 2 of 4
Juliana, et al v. United States of America, et al Case No.: 6:15-cv-01517-AA

Notice of Substitute Counsel Page 3 of 4

STATEMENT OF CONSENT

Pursuant to LR 83-11(d), I hereby consent to my withdrawal in this matter and to the 

substitution of Garrison A. Todd as counsel of record.

/s/ Nathan Haynes

Nathaniel Haynes 

(AK Bar No. 1906061)

Case 6:15-cv-01517-AA Document 534 Filed 01/05/23 Page 3 of 4
Juliana, et al v. United States of America, et al Case No.: 6:15-cv-01517-AA

Notice of Substitute Counsel Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 5, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of Oregon by 

using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such to the attorneys of record.

/s/ Leilani J. Tufaga

Leilani J. Tufaga

Law Office Assistant III

Case 6:15-cv-01517-AA Document 534 Filed 01/05/23 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         114,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,649
<PP&E>                                         153,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,240
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,499
<BONDS>                                             12
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           257
<OTHER-SE>                                     164,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,493
<SALES>                                         34,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,425
<CGS>                                           35,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,682
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,911)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (844)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,027)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,027)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
        

</TABLE>