alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1980 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1980

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain coins to be 
   acquired by individual retirement accounts and other individually 
                    directed pension plan accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 1998

  Mr. Breaux introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain coins to be 
   acquired by individual retirement accounts and other individually 
                    directed pension plan accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN COINS NOT TREATED AS COLLECTIBLES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 408(m)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exception for certain coins 
and bullion) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(A) any coin certified by a recognized grading 
                service and traded on a nationally recognized 
                electronic network, or listed by a recognized wholesale 
                reporting service, and--
                            ``(i) which is or was at any time legal 
                        tender in the United States, or
                            ``(ii) issued under the laws of any State, 
                        and''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1352

To amend Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to restore the

stenographic preference for depositions.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 31, 1997

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

to restore the stenographic preference for depositions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That paragraphs (2) and (3) of Rule 30(b) of the Federal

4 Rules of Civil Procedure are amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘(2) Unless the court upon motion orders, or

6 the parties stipulate in writing, the deposition shall

7 be recorded by stenographic means. The party tak8 ing the deposition shall bear the cost of the tran9 scription. Any party may arrange for a transcription
2

S 1352 IS

1 to be made from the recording of a deposition taken

2 by nonstenographic means.

3 ‘‘(3) With prior notice to the deponent and

4 other parties, any party may use another method to

5 record the deponent’s testimony in addition to the

6 method used pursuant to paragraph (2). The addi7 tional record or transcript shall be made at that par8 ty’s expense unless the court otherwise orders.’’.

Æ
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50750 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
PEDRO ANTONIO CHAVEZ

- OCHOA, also known as Christian Chavez

Hernandez,

Defendant

- Appellant

Cons. w/No. 17

- 50759
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
PEDRO ANTONIO CHAVEZ

- OCHOA, also known as Nelson Robles

- Chavez, also know as Adan Mauricio Chavez

- Molina, also known as Christian Chavez

Hernandez,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:10

- CR

- 653

- 1 USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 70

- 1 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 27, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50750 Document: 00514531064 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/27/2018No. 17

- 50750 c/w No. 17

- 50759

Before KING, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Pedro Antonio Chavez

- Ochoa was convicted of one count of illegal reentry into the United States and sentenced to serve 37 months in prison and
a three

- year term of supervised release. Additionally, his supervised release for a prior conviction was revoked, and he was sentenced to serve 24 months in prison, to run consecutively to the 37

- month sentence. Now, he appeals these sentences. His challenge to the reimposition of the mandatory special assessment in connection with the revocation has been mooted by the district court’s order striking the challenged portion of the revocation order. Insofar as he challenges the reimposition of the special assessment, h is appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
His argument that the enhancement of his statutory minimum sentences based upon his prior convictions that were not charged in the indictment and proved or admitted violated his constitutional rights is, as he concedes, fore closed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). His
sentences are AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 2 Case: 17-50750 Document: 00514531064 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/27/2018
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1849

To suspend temporarily the duty on trifluoromethylaniline.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24, 1998

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on trifluoromethylaniline.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRIFLUOROMETHYLANILINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.29.21 Trifluoromethylaniline (CAS

No. 98–16–8) (provided for

in subheading 2921.43.24) ... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/02 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to articles entered, or
2

•S 1849 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rodney Lamont ROBINSON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-4974.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 7, 2007.

Decided: May 24, 2007.

Michael S. Naehmanoff, Acting Federal Public Defender, Carolyn V. Grady, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Sara E. Flannery, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Lamont Robinson appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a sentence of forty-two months’ imprisonment. Robinson contends he was denied due process because the district court relied solely on his uncorroborated confession in finding he had violated the conditions of his supervised release. We review the district court’s decision to revoke a defendant’s supervised release for abuse of discretion. *United States v. Copley,*978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir.1992). The district court need only find a violation of a condition of supervised release by a preponderance of the evidence. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000).

After reviewing the materials in the joint appendix, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding by a preponderance of the evidence that Robinson violated the conditions of his supervised release by committing a crime. Robinson’s argument that the court erred in relying solely on his uncorroborated confession is unavailing as a revocation hearing is not a part of the criminal prose*346cution, and the traditional rules of evidence are not applicable. *See*Fed.R.Evid. 1101(d)(3).

Robinson also contends that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable. He argues that his advisory guideline range was improperly calculated because it was based on the court’s incorrect factual finding that he had committed a crime. As the court properly determined that Robinson had violated the conditions of his supervised release by committing a crime, and Robinson does not allege that the range is otherwise improper, we conclude Robinson’s sentence is reasonable.

We therefore affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1898 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1898

   To designate the Federal building located at 1301 Clay Street in 
  Oakland, California, as the ``Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 1, 1998

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 1301 Clay Street in 
  Oakland, California, as the ``Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF RONALD V. DELLUMS FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, 
California, shall be known and designated as the ``Ronald V. Dellums 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald V. Dellums 
Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18
U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned officers of American Commerce Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended August 31, 2009, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                                    |  |                  
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------
|Signatures             |  | Title                                                              |  | Date             
|                       |  |                                                                   
|/s/ Robert E. Maxwell  |  | Chairman of the Board & Director                                   |  | February 18, 2010
|Robert E. Maxwell      |  |                                                                    | 
|                       |  |                                                                   
|/s/ Daniel L. Hefner   |  | Chief Executive Officer, President & Director                      |  | February 18, 2010
|Daniel L. Hefner       |  |                                                                    | 
|                       |  |                                                                   
|/s/ Frank D. Puissegur |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Director |  | February 18, 2010
|Frank D. Puissegur     |  |                                                                    |
WILBORN LAW OFFICE, P.C. 

TIM WILBORN, Attorney at Law - OSB # 944644 

tim@wilbornlaw.com 

P.O. Box 370578 

Las Vegas, NV 89137 

Voice: (702) 240-0184 

Fax: (503) 926-9133 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

SHAWN WHITCHER, Case No. 2:15-cv-393-BR 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

Attorney fees in the amount of $6,831.05 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the 

Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412( d). Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury 

Offset Program, payment of this award shall be made via check sent to Tim Wilborn's address: P.O. 

Box 3 70578, Las Vegas, NV 8913 7. In accordance with the fee assignment which Plaintiff has 

signed, payment shall be made in Tim Wilborn's name if no debt subject to offset exists. 

1 .,. A ~'\ . DATEDthis~ dayof IV(<..''(( ,2016. 

Submitted on May 2, 2016 by: 

s/ Tim Wilborn 

TIM WILBORN, OSB # 944644 

(702) 240-0184 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER - Page 1 

ll 'lo · 1 " !\.]· 1·'1_. "l' _) t;'\J \./{ ~ .. ( \. ,)! l'J Vf.,! ' v~ 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-00393-BR Document 19 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Clyde A. Doty, Appellant, v Lori P. Doty, Respondent.

— Harvey, J.

Petitioner and respondent were married in 1981 in Virginia. The only child of the marriage, Jamie E. Doty, was born March 3, 1982 in New Hampshire. After living in Maine for approximately two years, the family moved to New York in June 1985. Marital discord developed and, in November 1985, when it appeared respondent was about to leave the State with the child, petitioner obtained a temporary order of custody.

A full hearing on the issue of child custody was held before Family Court in March 1986. After hearing the conflicting testimony of the parties and the witnesses which were called, the court granted respondent custody with liberal visitation rights for petitioner. This appeal ensued.

*324Petitioner contends that the award of physical custody of the child to respondent was not in the best interest of the child. In cases involving disputes over custody of a child, the findings of the trial court are accorded the greatest respect *(Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 173). This court is reluctant to substitute its judgment for that of the court which heard the witnesses and evaluated the conflicting testimony *(Matter of Estes v Estes,*112 AD2d 568). Here, Family Court found the evidence presented by respondent to be more credible. This determination was consistent with the recommendation of the Law Guardian that respondent be awarded custody. We have found nothing in the record to justify altering the custody order.

Petitioner’s further contention that his application should be granted since respondent and the child have moved to Maine is meritless. This is not a case of child snatching *(see, Matter of Nehra v Uhlar,*43 NY2d 242) or fleeing the jurisdiction to frustrate the visitation rights of the noncustodial parent *(see, Courten v Courten,*92 AD2d 579). Here, it was evident at the time of the hearing that respondent would return with the child to her family in Maine. Indeed, Family Court acknowledged this in its decision and in discussing possible visitation rights. Furthermore, a majority of the child’s life prior to moving to New York in June 1985 had been spent in Maine. Petitioner has failed to show how it would be in the best interest of the child to alter the current custody arrangement *(see, Clarke v Clarke,*101 AD2d 911).

Order affirmed, without costs. Main, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB ("Quarterly Report") ofItronics Inc. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of theundersigned, in their capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

 

 

Date: April , 2008/S/ JOHN W. WHITNEY
John W. Whitney

President 

(Principal Executive and 

Financial Officer)
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cropping Systems Research Laboratory: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Docs







CSRL Calendarheadline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 10.12


     Schedule of Executed Joint Venture Agreements
               By and Between Coverntry Corporation


Coventry Corporation a wholly-owned subsidary of Sterling House Corporation
has entered into the following agreements with Elderly Living, Limited
Partnership which vary only in the following material respects from Exhibit
10.13.

Project Entities                   Date Executed           Facility Location

Hartford Development               June 25, 1997            Gainesville, FL
Limited Partnership                                         Punta Gorda, FL

Dorset Development,                July 31, 1997            Winter Haven, FL
Limited Partnership                                         Deland, FL

Newcastle Development, L.L.C.      July 31, 1997            Hickory, NC

York Development, Limited          July 31, 1997            Bowling Green, OH
                                                            Englewood, OH
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 164 (Friday, August 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 48245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18434]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-889]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Cambrex Charles 
City

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Cambrex Charles City has applied to be registered as an 
importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before September 27, 
2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before September 27, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
request for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this 
is notice that on July 29, 2021, Cambrex Charles City, 1205 11th Street 
Charles City, Iowa 50616-3466, applied to be registered as an importer 
of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Psilocybin..............................    7437  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for 
further manufacturing prior to distribution to its customers. No other 
activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration.
    Approval of permit applications will occur only when the 
registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized 
under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import 
of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished 
dosage forms for commercial sale.

Brian S. Besser,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-18434 Filed 8-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P