alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1839

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-chloro-N-[2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl) phenyl]-N-ethyl-6-fluorobenzenemethanamine.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24, 1998

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-chloro-N-[2,6-dinitro4-(tri-fluoromethyl) phenyl]-N-ethyl-6-fluorobenzenemethanamine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 2-CHLORO-N-[2,6-DINITRO-4-(TRI4 FLUOROMETHYL) PHENYL]-N-ETHYL-6-

5 FLUOROBENZENEMETHANAMINE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

9 new heading:
2

•S 1839 IS

‘‘ 9902.29.23 2-chloro-N-[2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl) phenyl]-Nethyl-6-

fluorobenzenemethanamine

(CAS No. 62924–70–3) (provided for in subheading

2924.29.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/02 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to articles entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### George VAN WAGNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, Respondent-Appellee, Thomas H. Fluharty, Trustee-Appellee.

No. 11-1204.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 25, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 29, 2011.

George Van Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. William L. Hallam, Rosenberg, Martin & Greenberg, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN,* Circuit Judges.

*

 The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Van Wagner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to appeal an interlocutory order issued by the bankruptcy court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Van Wagner seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1700

AN ACT

To designate the headquarters building of the Department

of Housing and Urban Development in Washington, District of Columbia, as the ‘‘Robert C. Weaver Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1700 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT C. WEAVER FED2 ERAL BUILDING.

3 In honor of the first Secretary of Housing and Urban

4 Development, the headquarters building of the Depart5 ment of Housing and Urban Development located at 451

6 Seventh Street, SW., in Washington, District of Columbia,

7 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert C. Weaver

8 Federal Building’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

12 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

13 to the ‘‘Robert C. Weaver Federal Building’’.

Passed the Senate July 31, 1998.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1700

AN ACT

To designate the headquarters building of the Deert C. Weaver Federal Building’’. Washington, District of Columbia, as the ‘‘Rob- partment of Housing and Urban Development in
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1959

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to provide or support programs

to provide individuals with hypodermic needles or syringes for the use

of illegal drugs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 21, 1998

Mr. COVERDELL (for himself, Mr. ASHCROFT, and Mr. BROWNBACK) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to provide

or support programs to provide individuals with hypodermic needles or syringes for the use of illegal drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR HYPO4 DERMIC NEEDLES.

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed6 eral funds shall be made available or used to carry out

7 or support, directly or indirectly, any program of distribut-
2

•S 1959 IS

1 ing sterile hypodermic needles or syringes to individuals

2 for the hypodermic injection of any illegal drug.

Æ
# C_2005331EN.01001401.xml

| 28.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/14

---

Notice inviting applications for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block P8 of the Dutch continental shelf

(2005/C 331/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block P8 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

Mijnbouwregeling

Staatscourant

With reference to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons and the publication required by Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit an application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block P8.

Mijnbouwwet

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to the Minister for Economic Affairs, for the attention of the Director of Energy Production, Prinses Beatrixlaan 5, The Hague, Netherlands, and marked ‘personal’. Applications submitted after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after the period has expired.

Further information can be obtained from the following telephone number: (31-70) 379 66 94.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with amendment  number 2 of the Quarterly Report of Oak Hill
Financial,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, R. E. Coffman,  Jr.,  President,  Chief Executive  Officer &
Chief Administrative Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ R. E. Coffman, Jr.

R. E. Coffman, Jr. President & Chief Executive Officer


December 9, 2005


                                      -22-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

ASTRA OIL COMPANY, LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability company, 

Case No. 3: 14-cv-1 077 -AA 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HYDRO SYNTEC CHEMICALS, INC., a 

Colorado corporation, and DAVID K. K. 

TSANG, an individual, 

Defendants. 

ORDER, PURUSANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 

1963, CERTIFYING JUDGMENT FOR 

REGISTRATION IN THE DISTRICT 

OF NEVADA, NORTHERN 

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND 

THE COURTS OF BRITISH 

COLUMBIA, CANADA 

The Judgment attached hereto was entered by this Court on September 23, 2015 

(the "Judgment"). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a), the time 

during which the parties may appeal from the Judgment expires on October 23, 2015. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963, plaintiff Astra Oil Company, LLC ("Astra") moved 

ex parte for an order certifying the Judgment for registration in the District of Nevada, 

District of California and the courts of British Columbia, Canada prior to October 23, 

2015. Astra submitted affidavits demonstrating to the Court's satisfaction that 

Defendants' assets are not located in this District but may be located in the District of 

Nevada, the Northern District of California and in Vancouvecr7 British Columbia, Canada. 

See ColumbiaoPictures Television, Inc. v. Krvpton BroadcastingofBirmingham. Inc., 

Page 1 -ORDER CERTIFYING JUDGMENT FOR REGISTRATION IN ANOTHER DISTRICT 

SUSSMAN SHANK LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1400, PORTLAND, OREGON 97205-3089 

TELEPHONE (503) 227-11111 FACSIMILE (503) 248-0130 

Case 3:14-cv-01077-AA Document 102 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 2
259 F .3d 1186, 1197-98 (9th Cir. 2001 ), cert den., 534 U.S. 1127 (2002). 

Therefore, for good cause showing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS: 

The attached Judgment is certified for registration in the United States District 

Court for the District of Nevada, the United States District Court for the District of 

California, and in the Supreme or Provincial Courts of British Columbia, Canada, prior to 

expiration of the 30-day appeal period applicable to the Judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this Jt day of October, 2015 

SUBMITTED BY: 

Clifford S. Davidson, OSB 125378 

SUSSMAN SHANK LLP 

1000 SW Broadway Ste 1400 

Portland, Oregon 97205 

(503) 227-1111 

cdavidson@sussmanshank.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Hon. Ann Aiken 

U.S. District Court Chief Judge 

*22984-001\PROPOSED ORDER TO WITHDRAW FUNDS AND DISBURSE (02134117);1 

Page 2- ORDER CERTIFYING JUDGMENT FOR REGISTRATION IN ANOTHER DISTRICT 

SUSSMAN SHANK LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1400, PORTLAND, OREGON 97205-3089 

TELEPHONE (503) 227-1111 J FACSIMILE (503) 248-0130 

Case 3:14-cv-01077-AA Document 102 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1729 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1729

 To amend title 28, United States Code, to create two divisions in the 
                Eastern Judicial District of Louisiana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 1998

  Mr. Breaux introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 28, United States Code, to create two divisions in the 
                Eastern Judicial District of Louisiana.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CREATION OF TWO DIVISIONS.

    Section 98(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(a) The Eastern District comprises two divisions.
            ``(1) The New Orleans Division comprises the parishes of 
        Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, Saint Bernard, Saint Charles, 
        Saint John the Baptist, Saint Tammany, Tangipahoa, and 
        Washington.
            ``Court for the New Orleans Division shall be held at New 
        Orleans.
            ``(2) The Houma Division comprises the parishes of 
        Assumption, Lafourche, Saint James, and Terrebonne.
            ``Court for the Houma Division shall be held at Houma.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 
take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Pending Cases Not Affected.--This Act and the amendments made 
by this Act shall not affect any action commenced before the effective 
date of this Act and pending on such date in the United States District 
Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana or in the United States 
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.
    (c) Juries Not Affected.--This Act and the amendments made by this 
Act shall not affect the composition, or preclude the service, of any 
grand or petit jury summoned, impaneled, or actually serving on the 
effective date of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### LESTER et al., Appellants, v. WORDEN et al, Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 20, 1896.)

Action by Merriman J. Lester and others, as overseers, etc., against Harmon W. Worden and others.

No opinion. Motion granted. No costs to either party.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 188

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make preferential treatment

an unlawful employment practice, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 22, 1997

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make preferential

treatment an unlawful employment practice, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Rights Restora5 tion Act of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT.

7 (a) UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE.—Section

8 703(j) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–

9 2(j)) is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 188 IS

1 ‘‘(j)(1) It shall be an unlawful employment practice

2 for any entity that is an employer, employment agency,

3 labor organization, or joint labor-management committee

4 subject to this title to grant preferential treatment to any

5 individual or group with respect to selection for, discharge

6 from, compensation for, or the terms, conditions, or privi7 leges of, employment or union membership, on the basis

8 of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin of such

9 individual or group, for any purpose, except as provided

10 in subsection (e) or paragraph (2).

11 ‘‘(2) It shall not be an unlawful employment practice

12 for an entity described in paragraph (1) to recruit individ13 uals of an underrepresented race, color, religion, sex, or

14 national origin, to expand the applicant pool of the individ15 uals seeking employment or union membership with the

16 entity.’’.

17 (b) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in the amendment

18 made by subsection (a) shall be construed to limit the au19 thority of courts to remedy, under section 706(g) of the

20 Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–5(g)), inten21 tional discrimination under title VII of such Act (42

22 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.).

Æ
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joan Katzeff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------
|Date: May 15, 2009     
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Joan Katzeff
|Joan Katzeff, President
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Ranell Jacobson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2005                                                  /s/ Ranell Jacobson   Ranell Jacobson   Treasurer