alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Ursula M. Marquardt, Respondent, v Paul D. Marquardt, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 824]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered March 14, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. The order, inter alia, found that respondent had committed acts constituting the family offense of disorderly conduct.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, respondent appeals from an order that, inter alia, determined that he committed the family offense of disorderly *1437conduct (Penal Law § 240.20) against petitioner on two occasions. At the beginning of the fact-finding hearing, respondent requested that Family Court limit the proof to events occurring within two years prior to the filing of the petition. Both instances of disorderly conduct fall within that time period. Respondent therefore waived his contention that he was denied due process based on the court’s consideration of alleged instances of disorderly conduct that occurred during that time period and his further contention that the proceeding is barred by laches or the statute of limitations *(see generally Lahren v Boehmer Transp. Corp.,*49 AD3d 1186, 1187 [2008]; *Cerilli v Kezis,*306 AD2d 430 [2003]).

Contrary to respondent’s contention, we conclude that petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent engaged in acts constituting disorderly conduct *(see Matter of Hagopian v Hagopian,*66 AD3d 1021, 1022 [2009]). The court’s “assessment of the credibility of the witnesses is entitled to great weight, and the court was entitled to credit the testimony of [petitioner] over that of [respondent]” *(Matter of Scroger v Scroger,*68 AD3d 1777, 1778 [2009], *lv denied*14 NY3d 705 [2010]). Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT Page 1 of 1

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: carl@crowell-law.com

Drew P. Taylor, OSB No. 135974

email: drew@crowell-law.com

CROWELL LAW

P.O. Box 923

Salem, OR 97308

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

COBBLER NEVADA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

PETER DREVETS,

Defendant.

 Case No.: 6:15-cv-00862-ST

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

 LR 41-1(a)

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Pursuant to LR 41-1(a), plaintiff provides that plaintiff and defendant, through counsel, 

have reached a substantial agreement about the terms of a settlement and anticipate a final form 

of consent judgment to be submitted to the court within 45 days.

DATED: December 14, 2015.

/s/ Drew P. Taylor

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: carl@crowell-law.com

Drew P. Taylor, OSB No. 135974

email: drew@crowell-law.com

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiff

Case 6:15-cv-00862-ST Document 19 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 1
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 8 -00416-CR

Ro ge r And r e ws , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-07 -30 1105 , HO NORAB LE WI LF ORD F LOW ERS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt’ s c ourt -a

pp ointe d att or

ne y fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ingthat th e a pp e a l is frivolous and without merit. The brief mee ts the require ments of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1 9 6 7 ) , b y p r e s e n ti n g a p r o f e s s io n a l e v a lu a ti o n o f th e r e c o r d d e mo n s tr a ti n g w h y th ere are no
ar guable g rounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); H i g h v . Stat e , 57 3 S. W.2 d 8 07 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 48 5 S.W. 2d 55 3 (T e x. Cr im. App . 1 97 2) ; Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)
. Appellant rec eived a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate r ecor d and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. We have r eviewe d the re cord a nd counsel’s br ief a

nd ag ree that the a

p p e a l is frivolous
and wi tho ut m e ri t. We fi nd no thi ngin t

he re c or d th a t mi g ht a

rgua bly su pp or t th e a pp e a l.2

Se e Bl e ds oev . S

tate , 17 8 S .W .3 d 8 24 , 8 26 -2 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 05 ). Couns e l’ s mo tio n to withdraw is g rante d.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice

Be fore J ustices Patterson, Waldrop and H enson Affir med Filed: De cembe r 17, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs





- Landscape Toolbox
- Long Term Agricultural Research
- EcoTrends
- Long Term Ecological Research
- Ecological Site Descriptions
- Monitoring & Assessment
- Southwest Climate Hub
- Land Potential Knowledge System
- National Ecological Observatory Network
- JournalMap
- Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM)
- Data Catalogs

OUTCROP TREATMENTheadline bar Please choose the type of training to be performed on Outcrop soil types. The soil at Outcrop-type sites is partially-indurated gypsum exposed at and near the soil surface. Compared to Dune Margin and Transition-type sites, there is more evidence of previous anthropogenic disturbance. This the most suitable site type for all training types due to its high resistance and resilience to disturbance. Also, training can be repeated more frequently than at other site types.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
No. 83321 

MI= 

AUG 1 L 2021 

À. BROWN 

CLE PREME 

DEPUTY CLERK BY 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

WILBERT ROY HOLMES, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

CAPUCINE YOLANDA HOLMES, 

Respondent. 

01?DER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from the district court's minute order 

resolving various motions. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court 

Division, Clark County; Heidi Almase, Judge. 

Initial review of the notice of appeal and documents before this 

court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The district court's minute order is not 

effective and cannot be appealed. See State, Div. of Child & Family Servs. 

v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004) 

([D]ispositional court orders that are not administrative in nature, but deal 

with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying controversy, must 

be written, signed, and filed before they become effective."); Rust v. Clark 

Cty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) (stating that 

the district court's minute order is ineffective and cannot be appealed). To 

the extent, if any that appellant appeals from the August 10, 2021, order 

granting motion for sanctions, that order likewise cannot be appealed. The 

order merely directs respondent's attorney to file a memorandum of fees 

and costs and indicates that the court will thereafter enter an order 

awarding the fees and costs as a sanction. Because the order does not 

actually provide for an award of fees and costs, this appeal is premature as 

2,1 - 21-5 11 

SUPREME COURT 

OP 

NEVADA 

tth I947A aligg9D 
Silver 

to that order. See NRAP 3A(b)(8). Accordingly, it appears that this court 

lacks jurisdiction, and this court. 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

, 

Stiglich 

cc: Hon. Heidi Almase, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Wilbert Roy Holmes 

Heaton Fontano, Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

Of 

NEVADA 

(01 1947A atetilx, 2 

e-4,
Page 1 – DECLARATION OF MARK CRABTREE IN 

SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL

Jackson Lewis P.C.

1001 SW 5th Ave., Ste. 1205

Portland OR 97204

(503) 229-0404

(503) 229-0405 (fax)

Mark A. Crabtree, OSB #015070

CrabtreeM@JacksonLewis.com

April Upchurch Fredrickson, OSB #132027

April.fredrickson@JacksonLewis.com

Jackson Lewis P.C.

1001 SW 5th Avenue, Ste. 1205

Portland, OR 97204

(503) 229-0404

(503) 229-0405 (facsimile)

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

SUSAN DENISE MCPHEE,

Plaintiff

v.

TÜV SÜD AMERICA, INC., a foreign 

business corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 

DECLARATION OF MARK CRABTREE 

IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S 

NOTICE OF REMOVAL

[Removal of Multnomah County

Case No. 15CV02114]

I, Mark Crabtree, hereby declare:

1. I am an attorney employed by the law firm Jackson Lewis P.C., attorneys of 

record for Defendant TÜV SÜD America, Inc. I have personal knowledge of the matters set 

forth below and if called to testify I would testify as follows:

2. On February 25, 2015, I accepted service of the Summons and Complaint on 

behalf of Defendant TÜV SÜD America, Inc. Attached as Exhibit 1 hereto, is a true and correct 

of the Acceptance of Service which I signed on behalf of Defendant.

Case 3:15-cv-00421-ST Document 2 Filed 03/13/15 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 – DECLARATION OF MARK CRABTREE IN 

SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL

Jackson Lewis P.C.

1001 SW 5th Ave., Ste. 1205

Portland OR 97204

(503) 229-0404

(503) 229-0405 (fax)

3. Aside from the Summons and Complaint, no additional documents have been 

filed or served in this matter by either party. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct.

Date: March 13, 2015 By: /s/ Mark A. Crabtree

Mark A. Crabtree, OSB #015070

Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:15-cv-00421-ST Document 2 Filed 03/13/15 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 – DECLARATION OF MARK CRABTREE IN 

SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL

Jackson Lewis P.C.

1001 SW 5th Ave., Ste. 1205

Portland OR 97204

(503) 229-0404

(503) 229-0405 (fax)

DECLARATION OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I served the foregoing DECLARATION OF MARK CRABTREE 

IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL by:

 CM/ECF

Electronic Mail

US Postal Service

Facsimile Service

Arranging for Hand Delivery

Federal Express

as follows on the date stated below:

Craig A. Crispin

Crispin Employment Lawyers

1834 SW 58th Ave., Suite 200

Portland, OR 97221

Phone: 503-293-5770

Email crispin@employmentlaw-nw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

DATED this 13th day of March, 2015. 

By: /s/ Lori Dayton

Lori Dayton

4813-5536-9250, v. 1

Case 3:15-cv-00421-ST Document 2 Filed 03/13/15 Page 3 of 3
734 A.2d 859

#### Cynthia CLARK, Appellee, v. PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 27, 1999.

R. Bruce Morrison, Philadelphia, for John P. Simelaro, D.O. and PCOM.

Carole F. Kafrissen, Philadelphia, Thomas R. Schneider, for Cynthia Clark.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 1999, this appeal is dismissed as improvidently granted.
VIII

Calendar No. 673

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1926

For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 2, 1998

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 1998

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

A BILL

For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMI4 GRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the administration of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act, Regine Beatie Edwards

7 shall be classified as a child within the meaning of section

8 101(b)(1)(E) of such Act, upon approval of a petition filed
2

S 1926 RS

1 on her behalf by Stan Edwards, a citizen of the United

2 States, pursuant to section 204 of such Act.

3 (b) LIMITATION.—No natural parent, brother, or sis4 ter, if any, of Regine Beatie Edwards shall, by virtue of

5 such relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or sta6 tus under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Calendar No. 673

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1926

A BILL

For the relief of Regine Beatie Edwards.

OCTOBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 1998

Reported without amendment
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grand Forks, North Dakota
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Grand Forks, North Dakota People & Locations







Grace  Netzer
                        Grand Forks, North Dakota

                        




                        
                        Non-Federal Affiliate
                        Phone: (701) 795-8383
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
exv4w20







Exhibit 4.20




CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

PURSUANT TO SECTION  3807(e) OF  THE DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST ACT 

(12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq.)




     THIS Certificate of Amendment is being duly executed and filed on behalf of
each Delaware statutory trust (collectively, the “Trusts”) for which The Bank of
New York (Delaware) acts of trustee, by the undersigned, as trustee, to
amend the respective Certificates of Trust of the Trusts pursuant to Section
3807(e) of the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C.
§ 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”).



     1. Amendment of Certificates of Trust. The Certificate of Trust of
each of
the Trusts is hereby amended by changing the name of the trustee of the
Trusts in the State of
Delaware from The Bank of New York (Delaware) to BNYM (Delaware).



     2.
Effective Date. This Certificate of Amendment shall be
effective upon
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate as of
January 15, 2008, in accordance with Section 3807(e) of the Act.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	BNYM (DELAWARE), formerly known as

The Bank of New York (Delaware), not in 

its individual capacity but solely as trustee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	Vincent E. Sampson	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Vincent E. Sampson	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President	 	 






	 	 	 
	 

	 	State of Delaware
	 

	 	Secretary of State
	 

	 	Division of Corporations
	 

	 	Delivered 08:36 AM 01/15/2008
	 

	 	FILED 08:37 AM 01/15/2008
	 

	 	SRV 080043481 — 3280777 FILE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 21, 2009 

s1014 

Order 

 

October 21, 2009 

136580 & (22) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136580 

 COA: 283135 

Allegan CC: 03-034010-DJ 

CESAR CASSARRUBIAS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 By order of October 27, 2008, the defendant’s appellate counsel was directed to 

file a supplemental brief. On order of the Court, appellate counsel’s response having 

been received, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2008 order of the Court of 

Appeals is again considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet 

the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of 37 Capital Inc., (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacob H. Kalpakian, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
                                         information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                                         condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Date: May 10, 2018         |  | 
|-------------------------- |  | 
|                           |  | 
|/s/ Jacob
    H. Kalpakian |  | 
|Jacob H. Kalpakian         |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer    |  |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

WITOLD KISIEL,

Petitioner

v.

ZBIGNIEW WISZYNSKI,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 623 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BRUCE BRADBERRY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2508

[April 18, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 03-012909-CF10A.

Bruce Bradberry, Century, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.