alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended December 31, 2006
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Peter L Vosotas                  
|Peter L. Vosotas                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|Dated: February 14, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

KENNETH GIERLOFF, 

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:15-cv-01311-MC 

v. ORDER 

OCWEN, et al, 

Defendants. 

MCSHANE, Judge: 

Based on Defendant Ocwen's reported stipulation and agreement "not to commence a 

foreclosure during the pendency of this lawsuit" (ECF No. 18 at pp. 2-3), the Plaintiffs Motion 

for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 15) is DENIED as moot. Should a similar motion become 

necessary in the future, Plaintiffs counsel is reminded that they must comply with L.R. 7-1 and 

confer with opposing counsel prior to filing the motion. 

DATED this 25th day of January, 2016. 

I-ORDER 

Isl Michael J. McShane 

Michael J. McShane 

United States District Judge 

Case 6:15-cv-01311-MC Document 20 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Charles Elander, Respondent, v Pleasantville Fire District et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Kane, J.

On the date of his injury, October 26, 1984, claimant, then 16 years of age, was a member of the Pleasantville Junior Corps, one of five companies in the Pleasantville Fire Department in Westchester County. He was injured while operating his vehicle in response to a fire alarm. The issue on this appeal is whether he is entitled to the benefits provided by the Volunteer Firefighters’ Benefits Law as an active member of the Pleasantville Fire Department.

The Pleasantville Junior Corps was formed pursuant to a resolution of the Pleasantville Board of Fire Commissioners on November 9, 1974, in the interest of providing better fire protection for the residents of the District. The Board of Fire Commissioners accepted the Junior Corps as an additional fire company within the Pleasantville Fire District, with membership limited to those between the ages of 16 and 18 years of age and subject to the constitution and bylaws, as adopted for the Junior Corps. Members of the Junior Corps were required to respond to alarms, providing a school day was completed, and at the scene of a fire were under the direction and control of the Chief of the Department, subject to certain limitations such as not entering a building that is the scene of a fire. The record demonstrates tha their duties at the scene of a fire were consistent with those of an active firefighter. Accordingly, there is substantial evidence to support the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board that pursuant to the provisions of Town Law § 176-b, as a member of the Junior Corps, claimant became an active member of the Pleasantville Fire Department and is entitled to the benefits deriving therefrom. We also agree with the Board that there is no *389merit to the claim that the Junior Corps is a youth program contemplated by General Municipal Law § 204-b.

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Weiss, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







David  Lighthall
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Utility Systems Operator Supervisor
                        Phone: (785) 712-3171
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 1, 2016

s0525

Order 

Clerk

June 1, 2016

151664 & (16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151664

COA: 325317

St. Clair CC: 00-003254-FC

EARL THOMAS BOUGHNER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2015 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to 

remand is DENIED.
10.3

WHEREVER CONFIDENTIAL  INFORMATION IS OMITTED HEREIN (SUCH OMISSIONS ARE DENOTED
BY AN ASTERISK),  SUCH CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED SEPARATELY TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE  COMMISSION  PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR  CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT

                            ADDENDUM to AGREEMENT

June 18, 1998

Mr. Howard Rubin
President
Rubin Systems, Inc.
P.O. Box 387
450 Long Ridge Road
Pound Ridge, NY 10576

Dear Howard,

This letter is to confirm the agreement  between Rubin Systems  ("RSI") and META
Group,  Inc.  ("META")  whereby META will act as a distributor  for RSI and will
actively promote, sell, and distribute the Worldwide Benchmark Report. The terms
of the agreement are as follows:

1)   META receives *       * on all hard copy sales of the Worldwide Benchmark
     Report.   *              *                    *.

2)   META receives a *            * on all CD sales of the Worldwide  Benchmark
     Report. The  *       *       *      will be used to offset the development,
     production, and technical support costs  associated  with  creating and
     supporting a CD. Even though META is a non-exclusive  distributor of the
     hard copy version, META will be the exclusive distributor of the CD version
     of the Report.

3)   META  will  be  responsible  for  developing   product  specific  marketing
     campaigns and producing the necessary sales collateral.

4)   In return,  we ask you to promote the value  proposition  of the  Worldwide
     Benchmark Report with the Direct Marketing  Department and review the sales
     scripts and collateral.

5)   META and RSI have the ability to cancel this agreement by providing a
     notice in writing six months prior to the actual termination date.


*                 *                   *                        * META will
combine royalty payments with PEMS Sales on a monthly basis.

If the above meets with your understanding,  please sign one copy of this letter
below.


Very truly yours,                                        Agreed and Accepted

/s/ Bernard F. Denoyer
                                                         /s/ Howard Rubin
                                                         -----------------------
Bernard F. Denoyer                                       Howard Rubin, President
Chief Financial Officer                                  Rubin Systems, Inc.

                                                         Date: 6/30/98
                                                               --------
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Lubbock, Texas
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Shane  Wludyka
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Facility Operations Specialist
                        Phone: (806) 749-5560
                         ext. 5213
                        
                        Fax: (806) 723-5272(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1892

To provide that a person closely related to a judge of a court exercising

judicial power under article III of the United States Constitution (other

than the Supreme Court) may not be appointed as a judge of the

same court, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 31, 1998

Mr. KYL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide that a person closely related to a judge of a

court exercising judicial power under article III of the

United States Constitution (other than the Supreme

Court) may not be appointed as a judge of the same

court, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON CLOSELY RELATED PERSONS

4 SERVING AS FEDERAL JUDGES ON THE SAME

5 COURT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 458 of title 28, United

7 States Code, is amended—
2

•S 1892 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)(1)’’ before ‘‘No person’’;

2 and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(2) With respect to the appointment of a judge of

5 a court exercising judicial power under article III of the

6 United States Constitution (other than the Supreme

7 Court), subsection (b) shall apply in lieu of this sub8 section.

9 ‘‘(b)(1) In this subsection, the term—

10 ‘‘(A) ‘same court’ means—

11 ‘‘(i) in the case of a district court, the

12 court of a single judicial district; and

13 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a court of appeals, the

14 court of appeals of a single circuit; and

15 ‘‘(B) ‘member’—

16 ‘‘(i) means an active judge or a judge re17 tired in senior status under section 371(b); and

18 ‘‘(ii) shall not include a retired judge, ex19 cept as described under clause (i).

20 ‘‘(2) No person may be appointed to the position of

21 judge of a court exercising judicial power under article III

22 of the United States Constitution (other than the Supreme

23 Court) who is related by affinity or consanguinity within

24 the degree of first cousin to any judge who is a member

25 of the same court.’’.
3

•S 1892 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on

2 the date of enactment of this Act and shall apply only

3 to any individual whose nomination is submitted to the

4 Senate on or after such date.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Jason  Hinkson
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Mechanic
                        Phone: (785) 473-1298
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EX-10.16






 Exhibit 10.16 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (the “Second Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the Effective Date set forth on the signature page
(the “Effective Date”) by and between CAMBRIDGE PROPERTIES (herein referred to as “Lessor”) and KIROMIC, LLC, (herein referred to as “Lessee”) on the following terms and conditions, and thus; 

WITNESSETH 
 WHEREAS,
Lessor, as Lessor therein, and Lessee, as Lessee therein, entered into a certain Lease Agreement (the “Lease”) for approximately 9,352 square feet of net rentable area on the first floor in Suite 140 of the building known as the Fannin
South Professional Building the (the “Building) located at 7707 Fannin, Houston, Texas 77054; 
 WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee agreed to
expand the Leased Premise to include Suite 107; 
 WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee desire to further amend, modify, and supplement the Lease as
hereinafter set forth; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable
consideration respectively paid by each party to the other and receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee do hereby supplement and amend the Lease as follows: 

 

	1.	 Section 1 A. LEASED PREMISES shall be amended as follows: 



The Net Rentable Area shall be amended to relinquish Suite 107 as follows: 

 

			
	 Total Leased Premises
	  	 9,960 SF NRA

	 Suite 107 (Relinquished)
	  	 - 608 SF NRA

		
	 Total Leased Premises
	  	 9,352 SF NRA


  

	2.	 Section 2 A. TERM: 



The Term of the Lease shall be revised to reflect a Commencement Date of April 1, 2016 and a
forty-two (42) month lease term; 














	3.	 Section 5 A. BASE RENT shall be amended as follows: 



As part of the consideration for the execution of this Lease Agreement, Lessee covenants and agrees and promises to pay as base rent according
to the following schedule (the “Base Rent”): 
  

													
	 Months After

Commencement Date
	 	Rate Per Square Foot
of Net Rentable Area	 	 	Annual Base
Rent	 	 	Monthly Base
Rent	 
	1-6	 	$	 0.00	 	 	$	0.00	 	 	$	0.00	 
	7-42	 	$	19.00	 	 	$	177,688.00	 	 	$	14,807.33	 

  

	4.	 EXHIBIT F. WORK LETTER shall be amended as follows: 



 

	 	a.	 Lessee will be responsible for the upgrades to the HVAC, additional ventilation, electrical service and any
other upgrades or improvements deemed necessary to complete the lab and office suite; 


  

	 	b.	 Lessee agrees to use Lessor’s contractor, TD Industries, for the replacement of the (2) 5-ton units that serve suite 140. 


  

	5.	 It is understood and agreed that except as provided herein in this Second Amendment, all terms and conditions
of the original Lease Agreement shall apply to this Second Amendment during the Term and any renewals thereof. 


 EXCEPT as
expressly hereby amended, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be duly executed and effective on this 6th day of May, 2016 

 

	
	LESSOR:
	Cambridge Properties
	
	 By: /s/ Trey Miller

	Name: Trey Miller
	Title: Real Estate Property Manager
	
	LESSEE:
	
	KIROMIC, LLC
	
	 By: /s/ Scott Dahlbeck

	Name: Scott Dahlbeck
	Title: COO
PAGE 1 – OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JOHN DOE 310,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND IN 

OREGON and ROMAN CATHOLIC 

ARCHBISHOP OF PORTLAND IN 

OREGON,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:13-cv-822-PK

ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation in this

case on March 14, 2014. ECF 39. Judge Papak recommended that Plaintiff’s motion for partial 

judgment on the pleadings be denied as to the Defendants’ seventh affirmative defense, granted 

in part and denied in part as to the Defendants’ eighth affirmative defense, and denied as moot as 

to the Defendants’ third, fifth, tenth, and eleventh affirmative defenses. No party has filed 

objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), the court may “accept, reject or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 

Case 3:13-cv-00822-PK Document 46 Filed 04/25/14 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

§ 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate’s findings and recommendations, “the court 

shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 

or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 

474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended 

to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report[.]”); United States. v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (the court must review de novo magistrate’s findings 

and recommendations if objection is made, “but not otherwise”). 

Although review is not required in the absence of objections, the Act “does not preclude 

further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” 

Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 

recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court review the magistrate’s findings 

and recommendations for “clear error on the face of the record.”

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory 

Committee and reviews Judge Papak’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face 

of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Papak’s 

Findings and Recommendation (ECF 39). Plaintiff’s motion for partial judgment on the 

pleadings is granted in part and denied in part as discussed in Judge Papak’s Findings and 

Recommendation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 25th day of April, 2014.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00822-PK Document 46 Filed 04/25/14 Page 2 of 2
Document

Exhibit 10.4


ADDENDUM TO
CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS DEFERRED STOCK UNIT PLAN


This 2020 Addendum (this “Addendum”) to the Carrier Global Corporation Board of Directors Deferred Stock Unit Plan (Effective as of April 3, 2020) (the “Plan”) is adopted effective as of May 1, 2020.  All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Plan.


WHEREAS, in light of the financial hardships resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Carrier Global Corporation (the “Company”) desires to temporarily reduce the compensation payable to each Participant pursuant to the Plan;


WHEREAS, the reduction shall be applied to the base annual Deferred Stock Unit Award to be granted on or about May 12, 2020 (the “2020 Base Annual DSU Award”), which is the date that is two business days following the date of the Company’s earnings release for the first quarter of 2020, pursuant to Sections 3.02(a) and 4.05(a)(ii) of the Plan;


WHEREAS, each Participant’s 2020 Base Annual DSU Award shall be reduced by $12,400, an amount that equals 15% of the portion of the base Annual Retainer of $124,000 attributable to the period from May 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020; 


WHEREAS, Section 6.02(a) of the Plan provides that the Governance Committee of the Board may amend the Plan at any time, provided that no amendment may, without a Participant’s consent, reduce the Participant’s benefits accrued under the Plan before the date of such amendment; and


WHEREAS, this Addendum has been unanimously approved by the Board, including all members of the Governance Committee, and amends the provisions of the Plan solely with respect to the 2020 Base Annual DSU Award.


1.Compensation Reduction.  The value of the 2020 Base Annual DSU Award is hereby reduced from $186,000 to $173,600.  In all other respects, the 2020 Base Annual DSU Award will be granted to each Participant in accordance with, and subject to, the terms and conditions of the Plan.


2.Miscellaneous.  Except as expressly modified hereby, the terms and conditions of the Plan remain in full force and effect.  Sections 6.02 (Plan Amendment and Termination) and 7.11 (Governing Law) of the Plan are hereby incorporated herein by reference, mutatis mutandis.