alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned President of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Joan KatzeffPresidentMay 12, 2006
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of RC2 Corporation (the
      "Company") certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
      for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 4,
      2008


/s/ 
      Curtis W.
      Stoelting


Curtis
      W.
      Stoelting


Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive


Officer
      and Principal Financial Officer)




This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Robert  Harriott
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Mechanic Helper
                        Phone: (785) 712-3218
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|      |  |                                                  
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By:   |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall                                
|      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|      | 
|Date: |  | November 5, 2008                                 



Page 62 of 62
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                TB Wood's Corporation And Subsidiaries
                                                   Computation Of Earnings Per Share


                                                          Second Quarter                    Year to date
                                                    ---------------------------      ---------------------------
                                                    July 4, 1997      June 28,       July 4, 1997      June 28,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)                                  1996                             1996
--------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------      ------------- -------------

Weighted average number of common shares
<S>                                                        <C>           <C>                <C>           <C>
outstanding ............................................   5,831         5,750              5,829         5,226
Shares issued upon assumed exercise of
outstanding stock options ..............................      84           100                 83           101
Weighted average number of common and common              ------        ------             ------        ------
equivalent shares outstanding ..........................   5,915         5,850              5,912         5,327
Income before extraordinary item .......................  $2,145        $1,515             $4,282        $2,448
                                                          ------        ------             ------        ------
Extraordinary item .....................................      --            --                 --        (1,305)
Net  income ............................................   2,145         1,515              4,282         1,143
                                                          ------        ------             ------        ------
Net Income per common share:                              
Before extraordinary item ..............................   $0.36         $0.26              $0.72         $0.46
Extraordinary item .....................................      --            --                 --         (0.24)
                                                          ------        ------             ------        ------
 Net Income ............................................   $0.36         $0.26              $0.72         $0.21
                                                          



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1975 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1975

To broaden eligibility for emergency loans under the Consolidated Farm 
                       and Rural Development Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 1998

 Mr. Coverdell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To broaden eligibility for emergency loans under the Consolidated Farm 
                       and Rural Development Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmers Emergency Loan Reform Act of 
1998''.

SEC. 2. BROADENING OF ELIGIBILITY FOR EMERGENCY LOANS.

    (a) Elimination of Credit Elsewhere Test.--
            (1) In general.--Section 321(a) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 
        1961(a)) is amended in the 1st sentence by striking ``and are 
        not able to obtain sufficient credit elsewhere''.
            (2) Conforming amendments.--
                    (A) Section 321(d) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 1961(d)) 
                is amended--
                            (i) by striking ``--'' and all that follows 
                        through ``(1)''; and
                            (ii) by striking the semicolon and all that 
                        follows through ``periods of time''.
                    (B) Section 322 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 1962) is 
                amended by striking subsection (b).
    (b) Applicability of Disaster Loan Collateral Requirements Under 
the Small Business Act.--Section 322 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 1962) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) The collateral requirements for disaster loans under section 
7(b) of the Small Business Act shall apply to loans under this subtitle 
in lieu of any other collateral requirements.''.
    (c) Effect of Prior Forgiveness of Loans.--Section 373(b)(2) of 
such Act (7 U.S.C. 2008h(b)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``The Secretary may make an emergency loan under section 321 
to a borrower who has received not more than one debt forgiveness on a 
loan made or guaranteed under this title, if that debt forgiveness was 
in the form of a restructuring, write-down, or net recovery buy-out 
that is due to a financial problem of the borrower relating to a 
natural disaster or a medical condition of the borrower or a member of 
the immediate family of the borrower (or in the case of a borrower that 
is an entity, a principal owner of the borrower or a member of the 
immediate family of such an owner).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Mercado, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 501]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), rendered August 24, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of six months, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence to a period of three years’ probation, and otherwise affirmed.

The factual allegations contained in the misdemeanor information were sufficient to satisfy the physical injury element of assault in the third degree. The information recited that “defendant struck informant ... on his face with a closed fist,” and that “as a result of defendant’s actions, he suffered swelling and bruising to the left side of his face and bruising and swelling to his left eye as well as experienced annoyance, alarm and fear for his physical safety.”

These allegations were sufficient to warrant the conclusion that the victim suffered substantial pain. As in *People v Henderson*(92 NY2d 677 [1999]), based on the allegations, “a jury could certainly infer that the victim felt substantial pain” *(id.*at 680). We note that “substantial pain” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]) simply means “more than slight or trivial pain” *(People v Chiddick,*8 NY3d 445, 447 [2007]).

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Acosta, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
S. AMANDA MARSHALL, OSB #95347 

United States Attorney 

District of Oregon 

KATHLEEN L. BICKERS, OSB #85151 

Assistant United States Attorney 

1000 S.W. Third Avenue, Suite 600 

Portland, Oregon 97204 

Telephone: (503) 727-1100 

Facsimile Telephone: (503) 727-1117 

Internet E-mail Address: Kathleen.bickers@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civil No. 

Plaintiff, COMPLAINT 

Claim for Debt 

v. 

YEN-DONG HO-TIBAY AN, MD, 

Defendant. 

Plaintiff, United States of America, acting herein by the United States Attorney for the 

District of Oregon, complains and alleges: 

1. That this action is brought by the United States of America, with jurisdiction provided 

by 28 U.S.C. Section 1345. 

2. That the defendant, Yen-Dong Ho-Tibayan, MD, is a resident of the State of Oregon 

within the Court's jurisdiction. 

PAGE 1 -COMPLAINT 

Case 3:15-cv-00832-PK Document 1 Filed 05/14/15 Page 1 of 2
3. That the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the principal amount of $51,036.00, 

plus interest on this principal computed at the rate of 11 percent per annum in the amount of 

$31,699.65 as ofFebruary 21,2015, and interest continuing thereafter on this principal at the rate 

of 11 percent annum, until the date of judgment. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and 

incorporated herein. 

4. Demand has been made upon the defendant by the plaintiff for the sum due but the 

amount due remains unpaid. 

Wherefore, the plaintiff prays judgment against the defendant for the total of$82,735.65, 

inclusive of interest of$31,699.65 at 11 percent per annum on the principal of$51,036.00 which 

has accrued as ofFebruary 21, 2015, and will continue to accrue until date of judgment. Plaintiff 

further demands, pursuant to 28 U.S.C., Section 1961, that interest on the judgment be at the 

legal rate until paid in full. 

Dated this ~of May, 2015. 

PAGE 2 -COMPLAINT 

S. AMANDA MARSHALL 

United States Attorney 

District of Oregon 

Assistant United States. Attorney 

Case 3:15-cv-00832-PK Document 1 Filed 05/14/15 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00784

- CV
KARGES
- FAULCONBRIDGE, INC. , Appellant

v. Keath GARRISON and Kassie Garrison, Appellees From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CI00853 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 11, 2019
DI S MISSED On November 5, 2019, Karges

- Fa u lconbridge, Inc. filed a notice of accelerated appeal
from the trial court’s order denying K arges - Fa u lconbridge’s motion to dismiss

. The record was due November 15, 2019, ten days after the notice of appeal was filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.1( b ). The Bexar County District Clerk filed a notification stating the clerk’s record was not filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay the cl erk’s fee to prepare the record and is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. We therefore ordered Karges

- Fa u lconbridge, Inc. to provide written proof to this court by November 27, 2019, that the clerk’s fee for preparation of04

- 19

- 00784

- CV

- 2

- the record has been paid or that it is entitled to appeal without prepayment of the clerk’s fee. We advised appellant that if it failed to respond satisfactorily within the time provided, t his appeal
would be dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(c). Karges

- Fa u lconbridge, Inc. has not filed proof of payment or any other response to our order, and the clerk’s record has not been filed. We therefore order this appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Written
      Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Traffix, Inc.
      ("Registrant"), hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
      10-Q for the three months ended February 28, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Registrant.




By:
            /s/ Daniel
              HarveyDANIEL
              HARVEYChief
              Financial Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Additional ResourcesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research People & Locations







Corey  Elliott
                        Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Lab Technician
                        Phone: (515) 337-6544
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### WEBER, Respondent, v. HOUCK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.

December 28, 1895.)

Action by George Weber against Nancy R. Houck.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 171

To amend title 18, United States Code, to insert a general provision for

criminal attempt.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to insert a general

provision for criminal attempt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CRIMINAL ATTEMPT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 18, United

5 States Code, is amended by inserting before section 2 the

6 following:

7 ‘‘§ 1. Criminal attempt

8 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—A person is guilty of an offense if,

9 acting with the state of mind otherwise required for the

10 commission of a crime, that person intentionally engages
2

•S 171 IS

1 in conduct that, if successful, would constitute or result

2 in the offense.

3 ‘‘(b) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.—It is an affirmative

4 defense to a prosecution under this section that, under cir5 cumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunci6 ation of criminal intent, the defendant avoided the com7 mission of the crime attempted by abandoning any crimi8 nal effort and, if mere abandonment was insufficient to

9 accomplish such avoidance, by taking affirmative steps

10 that prevented the commission of the crime.

11 ‘‘(c) DEFENSE PRECLUDED.—It is not a defense to

12 a prosecution under this section—

13 ‘‘(1) that it was factually or legally impossible

14 for the actor to commit the crime, if the crime could

15 have been committed had the circumstances been as

16 the actor believed them to be; or

17 ‘‘(2) that the crime attempted was completed.

18 ‘‘(d) PROOF.—In a prosecution under this section,

19 any special proof provision that is specified in this title

20 as applicable to the crime attempted is applicable also to

21 an offense described in this section, unless a different ap22 plication is plainly required.

23 ‘‘(e) GRADING.—An offense described in this section

24 is an offense of the next lesser degree than the offense

25 attempted.
3

•S 171 IS

1 ‘‘(f) JURISDICTION.—There is Federal jurisdiction

2 over an offense described in this section if the crime at3 tempted is a Federal crime with regard to which Federal

4 jurisdiction—

5 ‘‘(1) is not limited to certain specified cir6 cumstances; or

7 ‘‘(2) is limited to certain specified cir8 cumstances and any such circumstance exists or has

9 occurred, or would exist or occur if the course of

10 conduct involving the crime were completed.’’.

11 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for

12 chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by

13 striking the item relating to section 1 and inserting the

14 following:

‘‘1. Criminal attempt.’’.

Æ