alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit












First Amendment to Sublease


This First Amendment to Sublease, dated for reference purposes as of May 1, 2020, is made by and between Immersion Corporation , a Delaware corporation (“Sublessor”), and Neato Robotics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Sublessee”), with respect to that certain Sublease dated March 12, 2020 by and between Sublessor and Sublessee (the “Sublease”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the same meaning given thereto in the Sublease.


		
	1.
	Recitals/Amendment: Whereas the Term of said Sublease is scheduled to commence on the later of (i) May 1, 2020 and (ii) fifteen (15) days following Master Lessor’s consent to the Sublease, the parties hereto desire to amend Paragraph 3. A. of the Sublease as follows:




		
	A.
	Anything contained in Paragraph 3. A. of the Sublease to the contrary notwithstanding, and subject to Master Lessor providing its written consent to the Sublease, said Term as set forth in Paragraph 3.A. shall begin, and the Commencement Date shall be deemed to have occurred, on the earlier of (i) the date Sublessee commences conduct of business operations from the Subleased Premises or (ii) the date that is fifteen (15) days after the lifting of the Order of the Health Officer of the County of Santa Clara, dated March 16, 2020, and Executive Order N-33-20 issued by the Executive Department, State of California, dated March 19, 2020, and any extensions thereof, or similar directives requiring residents to shelter in place or businesses that include businesses of Sublessor or Sublessee, to shut down or work remotely, issued by applicable municipal, state, and federal authorities having jurisdiction over the Subleased Premises in connection with the management of the COVID-19 pandemic (the “Orders”).  Notwithstanding the foregoing, Sublessor shall not delay delivery for any reason within its control.




		
	B.
	There are no other modifications to the Sublease except as described immediately above and all other terms and conditions of the Sublease shall remain in full force and effect.






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Sublease as of the day and year first above written.


SUBLESSOR:    SUBLESSEE:
IMMERSION CORPORATION,    NEATO ROBOTICS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation    a Delaware corporation


By: /s/ Mike Okada    By: /s/ Thomas Nedder


Name: Mike Okada    Name: Thomas Nedder


Its: General Counsel    Its: CEO


Address: 330 Townsend Street, St. 234    Address: 8100 Jarvis Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94107                94560 Newark, CA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HEALTHDYNE
INFORMATION ENTERPRISES, INC. CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE HEALTHDYNE INFORMATION
ENTERPRISES, INC. CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                        76
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,991
<PP&E>                                           1,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                     567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,554
<BONDS>                                            211
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           202
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,121
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,360
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    31
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (168)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (503)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Joint Motion to Continue Page 1

Revised April 2018

NATALIE K. WIGHT, OSB #035576

United States Attorney

District of Oregon

JEFFREY S. SWEET, OSB #994183

Assistant United States Attorney

jeff.sweet@usdoj.gov

405 East 8th Avenue, Suite 2400

Eugene, Oregon 97401

Telephone: (541) 465-6771

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CLEMENTE BOBBY PINEDA,

Defendant.

6:15-cr-00264-AA

JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE

Pursuant to this Court’s Order, the parties provide the following joint motion to continue:

Defendant is charged by indictment in Case No. 6:21-cr-00482-AA, and has a pending 

supervised release violation in Case No. 6:15-cr-00264-AA. He is in custody on both cases. The 

defense filed a motion to dismiss the indictment in Case No. 6:21-cr-00482-AA and the 

government filed a response on February 21, 2023. The motion is still pending. If the motion is 

denied, the parties anticipate the defendant entering a conditional guilty plea.

\\\

\\\

\\\ 
Joint Motion to Continue Page 2

Case No. 6:21-cr-00482-AA has been continued for 90 days, and the parties jointly 

request that Case No. 6:15-cr-00264-AA also be continued for 90 days as they will be resolved at 

the same time. 

Dated: June 9, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

NATALIE K. WIGHT

United States Attorney

s/ Jeffrey S. Sweet s/ Richard L. Fredericks

JEFFREY S. SWEET RICHARD L. FREDERICKS

Assistant United States Attorney Attorney at Law

Counsel for Clemente Bobby Pineda
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1811 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1811

      To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from 
promulgating any regulation, rule, or other order if the effect of such 
 regulation, rule, or order is to eliminate or modify any requirement 
under the medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act 
 for physician supervision of anesthesia services, as such requirement 
                  was in effect on December 31, 1997.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 1998

 Mr. Faircloth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from 
promulgating any regulation, rule, or other order if the effect of such 
 regulation, rule, or order is to eliminate or modify any requirement 
under the medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act 
 for physician supervision of anesthesia services, as such requirement 
                  was in effect on December 31, 1997.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safer Seniors Medical Care Act of 
1998''.

SEC. 2. PHYSICIAN SUPERVISION OF ANESTHESIA SERVICES.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall not promulgate any 
regulation, rule, or other order if the effect of such regulation, 
rule, or order is to eliminate or modify any requirement under the 
medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) for physician supervision of anesthesia services, 
as such requirement was in effect on December 31, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grand Forks, North Dakota
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Klyde  Whitman
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        IT Specialist
                        Phone: (701) 795-8467
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1745 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1745

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide flexibility in the 
   order in which the Board of Veterans' Appeals hears and considers 
                                appeals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 1998

Mr. Specter (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide flexibility in the 
   order in which the Board of Veterans' Appeals hears and considers 
                                appeals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO DOCKET ORDER CONSIDERATION.

    Section 7107(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Except as provided in 
        subsection (f)'' and inserting ``Except as provided in 
        paragraph (2) and subsection (f)'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
            (3) by inserting the following:
            ``(2) The Board may consider and decide an appeal later 
        than its place on the docket would normally require if such 
        delay is necessary to provide the appellant a hearing.''.

SEC. 2. SCHEDULING OF FIELD HEARINGS.

    (a) Section 7107(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) A hearing to be held within an area served by a 
        regional office of the Department shall (except as provided in 
        paragraph (3)) be scheduled to be held in accordance with the 
        case's place on the docket referred to in subsection (a) 
        relative to the other cases for which a hearing is scheduled to 
        be held in that area.''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) applies to requests for a 
hearing received by the Department on or after the date of enactment.

SEC. 3. ADVANCEMENT ON THE HEARING DOCKET.

    Section 7107(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:
            ``(3) A hearing to be held within an area served by a 
        regional office of the Department may, for cause shown, be 
        advanced on motion for an earlier hearing. Any such motion 
        shall set forth succinctly the grounds upon which it is based 
        and may not be granted unless the case involves interpretation 
        of law of general application affecting other claims or for 
        other sufficient cause shown.''.
                                 <all>
```
FILED IN

14th COURT OF APPEALS

OCT 26 2015

GWVL,-/ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

«w£V« ^"W^lHs^oV Vo,V bH,^o^ r^^M^Mk ^ea^y WfCec^
*r%

Xo

\

bO

wV

\n" rH

^f

r

c -&

r

-J

>•

1

3 tK

9

i 5>

03 rtj

<t

^^

o

rCM

10O

(MWOo
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models
                        What Are Crop Simulation Models?
                                    2DSoil Model
                                    Spudsim (Potato) Model
                                    CLASSIM
                    Controlled Environment FacilitiesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory People & Locations







Karande Gajanayake Mudiyanselage

                                                                (PhD)
                        Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Visiting Scientist
                        Phone: (240) 960-6525
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 162 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 162

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 
Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to 
 travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent 
 as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel on such 
                               aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 1997

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 
Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to 
 travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent 
 as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel on such 
                               aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRAVEL ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT OF CERTAIN DISABLED FORMER 
              MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding after section 1060a the following new section:
``Sec. 1060b. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former 
              members of the armed forces
    ``The Secretary of Defense shall permit any former member of the 
armed forces who is entitled to compensation under the laws 
administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for a service-
connected disability rated as total to travel, in the same manner and 
to the same extent as retired members of the armed forces, on 
unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and 
on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Military Airlift Command. 
The Secretary of Defense shall permit such travel on a space-available 
basis.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 
1060a the following new item:

``1060b. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former members 
                            of the armed forces.''.
                                 <all>
```
1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

HILARY ANDRIESIAN, on behalf

of herself and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, No. 3:14-cv-01600-ST

v. 

 

COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY, INC., ORDER

a Florida corporation, 

 Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation [25] on March 3, 2015, 

in which she recommends that this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Motion to 

Dismiss [15]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Defendant filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & 

Recommendation. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & 

Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the 

Case 3:14-cv-01600-ST Document 30 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 2
2 – ORDER

Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th 

Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

I have carefully considered Defendant’s objections and conclude there is no basis to 

modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the 

record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart’s Findings & Recommendation [25].

Therefore, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [15] is granted as to the alleged violations of ORS 

646.608(1)(f), (t) and (u) in the First Claim; granted as to the Second Claim; and otherwise 

denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2015.

 

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01600-ST Document 30 Filed 04/28/15 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,577
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       (3,577)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         11,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,555
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               125,719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (136,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (136,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (136,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>