alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                      12,158,321
<SECURITIES>                                20,515,410
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,755,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            64,522,951
<PP&E>                                         488,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              86,171,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,868,459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,476
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,284,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                86,171,976
<SALES>                                     44,059,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,059,812
<CGS>                                       30,516,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,516,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,779,142
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,045,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,609,758
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,435,397
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,435,397
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Oak Hill  Financial,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, R.E.
Coffman,  Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ R. E. Coffman, Jr.
------------------------------------------------------
R. E. Coffman, Jr. President & Chief Executive Officer
July 29, 2004



                                       7
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7110

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

PRESTON GATTIS, JR., 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:02-cr-01156-DCN-1) 

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit 

Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Preston Gattis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas Bianchi, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Preston Gattis, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for new trial under Fed. R. Crim. 

P. 33, based upon newly discovered evidence. The district court 

concluded that the motion was untimely. We agree. Under 

Rule 33, Gattis had “3 years after the verdict or finding of 

guilty” to file his motion. Fed. R. Crim. P. 33(b)(1). The 

jury found Gattis guilty on October 16, 2003. Because Gattis 

did not file his Rule 33 motion until October 9, 2008, at the 

earliest, we conclude that he did not timely file the motion. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info Forecast Maps





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: Grasshopper Forecast 2008headline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/2008_Hazard_map.jpg < Previous Map      Back to Outbreak Info      Next Map > The data summarized in this map were furnished by the respective state, county, university and federal agencies using a variety of survey methods and analytical techniques.  Due to funding considerations, states may not have continuous survey coverage. This map was prepared by USDA-APHIS-PPQ in cooperation with CPHST.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>


DYNAMARK CORPORATION
56 Dune Road
Atlantic Beach, New York 11909

         
Mr. Allan P. Rothstein
56 Dune Road
Atlantic Beach, New York  11905


Dear Mr. Rothstein:

         This shall confirm our agreement to extend your Employment
Agreement dated August 1, 1998 to August 1, 1999 upon the same terms and
conditions as presently in effect. Kindly confirm your agreement by signing
below where indicated.

                           DYNAMARK CORPORATION

                           By:/s/Allan P. Rothstein
                                 Allan P. Rothstein, Secretary

Agreed to as of the 29th day
of October, 1998

/s/ALLAN P. ROTHSTEIN
Allan P. Rothstein
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank H. Jellinek, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    FRANK H. JELLINEK, JR.Frank H. Jellinek, Jr. Chief Executive Officer  October 24, 2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Apogent Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Apogent Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1906

To require the Senate to remain in session to act on judicial nominations

in certain circumstances.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 2, 1998

Mr. LEAHY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Rules and Administration

A BILL

To require the Senate to remain in session to act on judicial

nominations in certain circumstances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Judicial Emergency

5 Responsibility Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SENATE DURING A JUDI7 CIAL EMERGENCY.

8 Section 46 of title 28, United States Code, is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following:
2

•S 1906 IS

1 ‘‘(e) ACTION BY SENATE REQUIRED.—The Senate

2 shall not recess during a session for more than 9 days

3 without first voting on a judicial nomination in any case

4 in which—

5 ‘‘(1) the nomination to fill the judiciary vacancy

6 in the affected circuit court has been pending before

7 the Senate for a period of 60 days or longer; and

8 ‘‘(2) a judicial emergency is declared pursuant

9 to subsection (b) due to vacancies on the affected

10 circuit court.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Ronald T. Linares

Ronald T. Linares

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned President of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Joan KatzeffPresident November 9, 2006
S. 2071

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

An Act

To extend a quarterly financial report program administered by the Secretary

of Commerce.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT PROGRAM.

Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend title 13,

United States Code, to transfer responsibility for the quarterly

financial report from the Federal Trade Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, and for other purposes’’, approved January

12, 1983 (Public Law 97–454; 13 U.S.C. 91 note), is amended

by striking ‘‘September 30, 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30,

2005’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### STANGE, Respondent, v. PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS. CO., Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County,

Additional General Term.

December 16, 1895.)

Action by Lena Stange, as administratrix, against the Prudential Life Insurance Company.

William O. Campbell, for appellant.

William F. Bowne, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment reversed; new trial ordered; costs to appellant to abide event.
#### Petra Aureliano, Respondent, v Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

The plaintiffs, in their summons, designated Nassau County as the venue for the instant action on the ground that it was the "defendant’s place of business”.

The motion of the defendants Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. and Norton Simon, Inc. was one to change venue as a matter of right, on the ground that the county selected by the plaintiffs *692for trial was not proper, i.e., that none of the defendants had their principal offices in Nassau County *(see,*CPLR 503 [c]; 510 [1]). To change venue as a matter of right, these defendants were obligated to serve a "demand * * * for change of place of trial” either before or with the service of their answer, pursuant to CPLR 511 (a). The movants failed to comply with this requirement. Although their motion for a change of venue could have been granted in the court’s discretion *(see, De Litta v Milde,*52 AD2d 548), under all of the circumstances herein, including the laches involved, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to change venue from Nassau County to Suffolk County. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#### BURKHARDT, Respondent, v. NEW YORK EL. R. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Superior Court of New York City,

General Term.

December 18, 1895.)

Action by Elizabeth Burkhardt against the New York Elevated Railroad Company.

Davies, Short & Townsend (Julien T. Davies and George T. Aldrich, of counsel), for appellants.

E. W. Tyler and Edward A. Hibbard, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          187310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    35186
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                223654
<PP&E>                                          327664
<DEPRECIATION>                                  129717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  945132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           219141
<BONDS>                                         862500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    1244910
<COMMON>                                        236199
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1617618)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    945132
<SALES>                                        1156937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1156937
<CGS>                                           821803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1590268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               51077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1306211)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1306211)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1306211)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.79)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JEFFREY BARNES, 

 Plaintiff, 

3:15-cv-01424-SI

vs. 

ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $10,140.08 shall be awarded 

to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Attorney fees will be 

paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies 

for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in 

Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff’s attorney and 

mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, 

OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. 

DATED this _____ day of ___________________, 2018. 

_______________________________ 

Michael Simon 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-01424-SI Document 24-2 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 1

28th September

/s/ Michael H. Simon
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/s/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andprincipal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.Date:March 19, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5

<LEGEND>THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
HAGLER BAILLY, INC. UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                                           <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            3,960,598
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    34,048,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,253,546
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 45,894,827
<PP&E>                                            5,914,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3,061,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   60,017,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            15,156,152
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             88,677
<OTHER-SE>                                       44,772,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     60,017,108
<SALES>                                          96,099,443
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 96,099,443
<CGS>                                            71,157,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    71,157,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  785,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9,517,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3,784,425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5,733,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   2,024,266
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7,757,760
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.93



        

</TABLE>