alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pest Management Research: Sidney, MT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NPARL
                        Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
                                    Agricultural Systems Research Unit
                                    Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and ManagementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Sidney, Montana Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory Pest Management Research PMRU Docs Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management: Outbreak and Survey Info Forecast Maps





- NPARL Home
- PMRU Home
- ASRU Home
- Site Highlights
- Outbreak and Survey Info
- ID Tools | Apps
- Grasshopper Management
- IPM Handbook
- USDA Research | Contact Info

Outbreak Info: Grasshopper Forecast 2004headline bar /ARSUserFiles/30320505/grasshopper/Extras/images/Maps/hazard04new.jpg < Previous Map    Back to Outbreak Info      Next Map > The data summarized in this map were furnished by the respective state, county, university and federal agencies using a variety of survey methods and analytical techniques. This map was prepared by USDA-APHIS-PPQ in cooperation with CPHST.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
1 - ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION

LINDA SEATER, Case No. 1:14-cv-00953-CL

Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

KLAMATH COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 

McSHANE, District Judge:

This matter comes before me on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF Dkt. 

No. 57. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, ECF Dkt. No. 74, 

and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations were timely filed, I 

am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 

Case 1:14-cv-00953-CL Document 76 Filed 03/15/16 Page 1 of 2
2 - ORDER 

1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th 

Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which 

objections have been made). 

I have given the legal principles de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT 

the Report and Recommendation. ECF Dkt. No. 74. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, 

ECF Dkt. No. 57, is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s Sixth Claim, for violation of her procedural due 

process rights. Plaintiff’s other claims are REMANDED to state court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 15th day of March, 2016.

___/s/Hon. Michael McShane__

MICHAEL McSHANE

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:14-cv-00953-CL Document 76 Filed 03/15/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:       August 13, 2004         By  /s/ Buckner Woodford
                                    Buckner Woodford
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer

Date:       August 13, 2004         By  /s/ Gregory J. Dawson
                                    Gregory J. Dawson
                                    Chief Financial Officer



1
Lexlibrary/197885.1
#### WALKER v. SO. RY. CO.

(Decided June 17, 1913.)

Appeal from Marengo Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. E. J. Gilder.

C. L. Kelly, and L. R. Wilson, for appellant.

C. K. Abrai-iams, Henry McDaniel, and Pettus, Puller & Lapsley, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
1 –ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ANANA RAZUMNY ROBERTS,

6:15-cv-01460-CL

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 18), 

and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the 

file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 

Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is 

correct.

Case 6:15-cv-01460-CL Document 22 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 2
2 –ORDER

As in many social security cases, plaintiff’s case depends largely on her own credibility. 

Here, the ALJ determined Roberts was not entirely credible. I agree with Magistrate Judge 

Clarke that the ALJ’s findings there were supported by the record and free of legal error. The 

ALJ properly noted a one-year gap in seeking any treatment during a time Roberts complained of 

severe limitations due to debilitating pain. The ALJ also pointed to Roberts’s generally normal 

examinations as well as her activities of daily living. In short, the ALJ used “ordinary techniques 

of credibility determination” in evaluating Roberts’s credibility. See Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 

F.3d 1028, 1040 (9th Cir.2007). Although Roberts argues another interpretation is reasonable, 

the ALJ’s findings are supported by the record. 

Roberts now argues the ALJ failed to discuss whether Roberts equaled a listing at step 3. 

In her pre-hearing brief, however, Roberts’s attorney not only failed to argue Roberts equaled a 

listing but actually instructed the ALJ to proceed directly to step 5. Tr. 153. When represented by 

counsel, claimants “must raise all issues and evidence at their administrative hearings in order to 

preserve them on appeal.” Meanel v. Apfel, 172 F.3d 1111, 1115 (9th Cir. 1999). I reject 

Roberts’s attempt to assign error to something her counsel explicitly instructed the ALJ to not 

consider. 

Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) is adopted. The 

Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 23rd day of September, 2016.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________

Michael McShane

United States District Judge

Case 6:15-cv-01460-CL Document 22 Filed 09/23/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND FROM THE INCOME STATEMENT FOR
THE 3 MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                              508,252
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     2,533,848
<ALLOWANCES>                         95,000
<INVENTORY>                       4,835,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  8,163,677
<PP&E>                            4,062,892
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   14,354,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             3,713,435
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            105,603
<OTHER-SE>                        6,772,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     14,354,945
<SALES>                           3,507,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  3,507,110
<CGS>                             2,317,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       980,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      3,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   96,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     123,804
<INCOME-TAX>                         30,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  93,804
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         93,804
<EPS-BASIC>                           .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .03



</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research: Kimberly, ID
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Publication Reprints
                    Other NWISRL Links
                        NWISRL Publications
                                    Imperfect SSR Finder
                                    Shiny App ServerSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Kimberly, Idaho Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research People & Locations







Joseph  George
                        Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (208) 423-6529
                        
                        
                        Fax: (208) 423-6555(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Projects
                        NP 301Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research People & Locations







Lane  Vellinga
                        Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid (Plants)
                        Phone: (806) 749-5560
                        
                        
                        Fax: (806) 723-5272(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
THANH VAN DINH, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CAROLYN COL VIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Attachment 2 

3: 15-CV-01588-AA 

ORDER 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $2,978.81 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree that attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiffs attorney, dependent 

upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (20 l 0). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiffs attorney and 

mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, 

OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. 

DATED this !f- day of ,{)(}]!eu-c..~v:2016. 

Am1 Aiken 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-01588-AA Document 21 Filed 11/09/16 Page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cropping Systems Research Laboratory: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Community Outreach Filesheadline bar No pages to list.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### MICHAEL v. PREFERRED MUT. ACC. ASS’N OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 14, 1896.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jude J. Holland, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 806]—

Peters, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered December 3, 2010, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Following defendant’s plea of guilty to the crime of driving while intoxicated, he was sentenced in March 2007 to five years of probation. In July 2010, defendant admitted to violating the conditions of his probation, as the result of convictions of attempted menacing in the second degree in 2008 and unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in 2009, as well as possessing and *1505using alcohol on numerous occasions.*

Resentencing was adjourned and defendant was restored to probation supervision to provide him with another opportunity to re-engage in alcohol abuse and mental health treatment programs. County Court informed defendant that if he did not comply with the programs, or if he operated a motor vehicle or consumed alcohol, he would be sentenced to prison. In October 2010, the Probation Department reported that defendant had admitted to the continued consumption of alcoholic beverages subsequent to his admission that he violated his probation. Following a hearing, County Court concluded that defendant had violated a condition of his release, revoked his probation and resentenced him to a term of imprisonment of l2/s to 5 years. Defendant appeals.

We affirm. Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court did not base its finding that he had violated his probation on hearsay evidence. Defendant’s probation officer testified at the hearing that defendant admitted to him that he had consumed alcoholic beverages in October 2010 *(see People v Provost,*35 AD3d 899, 900 [2006]; *People v Spady,*25 AD3d 881, 882 [2006]; *People v Rushin,*196 AD2d 835, 836 [1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 808 [1993]). Nor do we find his resentence to be harsh or *excessive.*Despite being offered numerous opportunities, he was unable to comply with the terms of his probation. Under the circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the resentence in the interest of justice *(see People v Smurphat,*91 AD3d 980, 981 [2012], *lv denied*18 NY3d 962 [2012]; *People v Smith,*87 AD3d 1203, 1203 [2011]).

Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*

 Defendant was also charged in May 2010 with assault in the third degree and endangering the welfare of a child, and he ultimately pleaded guilty to endangering the welfare of a child on July 15, 2010.