alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.11

First Union

                                RENEWAL AGREEMENT

                                                       Date: February 23, 2001

BORROWER
Name:             Optical Cable Corporation
                  5290 Concourse Drive
                  Roanoke, Virginia 24019

RENEWAL. First Union National Bank (hereinafter "Bank") and Borrower hereby
extend the maturity of a promissory note dated March 10, 1999 in the original
principal amount of $5,000,000.00 made by Borrower and delivered to Bank (the
"Note") to March 31, 2002 when all outstanding principal and accrued interest
shall be due and payable.

AFFIRMATIONS OF BORROWER. Borrower affirms and represents that the most recent
Commercial Loan invoice received by Borrower with respect to the Obligations is
correct, that the Note, as modified hereby, and other Loan Documents are in full
force and effect, that Borrower has no defense to payment or performance of the
Obligations, that no setoffs against the Obligations exist, and that Borrower
has no counterclaims against Bank. Borrower ratifies and confirms all provisions
of the Note and other Loan Documents, including the confession of judgment
contained therein, and affirms that the maturity date is the only provision of
the Loan Documents that has been modified.

MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement and the other Loan Documents constitute the sole
agreement of the parties and supersede all oral negotiations and prior writings
with respect to the subject matter thereof. This Agreement may be signed in
counterparts. Terms used in this Agreement which are capitalized shall have the
meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed and sealed this Agreement the
date and year first above written.

PLACE OF EXECUTION AND DELIVERY. Borrower here by certifies that this Agreement
was executed in the Commonwealth of Virginia and delivered to Bank in the
Commonwealth of Virginia.

                                   Borrower name: Optical Cable Corporation
                                   Taxpayer Identification Number: 54-1237042


                                   By: s/Robert Kopstein
                                   Name printed: Robert Kopstein
                                   Title: President


                                   First Union National Bank


                                   By: s/Susan K. Doyle
                                   Name printed: Susan K. Doyle
                                   Title: Senior Vice President
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Joan KatzeffPresidentAugust 12, 2004
May 28, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHAD SMALL, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00654-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on July 10, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Virginia Callen, Appellant, v Comsewogue School District, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 818] —

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), dated October 3, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she tripped over a chain, suspended between two poles, used to block off an access roadway located at Comsewogue High School. At her deposition, the plaintiff testified that the chain hit her at a “high ankle or low shin” level.

The defendant established, prima facie, that the chain was open and obvious, i.e., readily observable by those employing the reasonable use of their senses, and not inherently dangerous *(see Thomas v Pleasantville Union Free School Dist.,*79 AD3d 853, 854 [2010]; *Badalbaeva v City of New York,*55 AD3d 764, 765 [2008]; *Siegenfeld v Long Is. Power Auth.,*46 AD3d 798, 799 [2007]; *Sun Ho Chung v Jeong Sook Joh,*29 AD3d 677, 678 [2006]; *Plis v North Bay Cadillac,*5 AD3d 578 [2004]; *Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48, 51-52 [2003]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Rivera, J.E, Hall, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Infinity, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;    and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Stanton E. Ross           Stanton E. Ross *President and Chief Executive Officer*March 30, 2005     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Infinity, Inc. and will beretained by Infinity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PATRICIA G. BOWLIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Commissioner, Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

6:15-CV-01454-PK

 

ORDER 

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and

Recommendation (#15) on August 18, 2016, in which he recommends

the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's

application for supplemental security income benefits and dismiss

this matter with prejudice. Plaintiff filed timely Objections to

the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this

Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b).

1 - ORDER

Case 6:15-cv-01454-PK Document 19 Filed 09/21/16 Page 1 of 2
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make

a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's

report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561

F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

In her Objections Plaintiff reiterates the arguments

contained in her Opening Brief and Reply. This Court has

carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do

not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. 

The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record

de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and

Recommendation (#15). Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the

decision of the Commissioner and DISMISSES this matter with

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 21st day of September, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 6:15-cv-01454-PK Document 19 Filed 09/21/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.1.1 First Amending Agreement (Sept 22, 2006) to Property Option Sept 8, 2006



AMENDING AGREEMENT

THIS SECOND AMENDING  made  22nd day of September 2006.

BETWEEN:

BRONX VENTURES INC. of Suite 100, 1255 West Pender Street, Vancouver, BC, V6E 2V1

(the "Optionor")

AND:

COLT CAPITAL CORP.of Suite 100, 1255 West Pender Street, Vancouver, BC, V6E 2V1

(the "Optionee")

WHEREAS the parties entered into an option agreement executed and made effective the 8th day of September, 2006, (the "Option Agreement"), with respect to an option on certain mineral claims and the parties wish to amend the terms thereof;

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.

Definitions

In this second amending agreement, unless otherwise provided for herein, any defined term will have the meaning ascribed to it in the Option Agreement.

2.

Amendments

Paragraph 3.2(d) of the Option Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"(d)

on formation of the Joint Venture each of the parties will have been deemed to have contributed $373,770 towards exploration costs on the Property.  If any party fails to contribute to its share of future exploration costs approved pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement its interest will be diluted on a straight line basis.  If any partys interest is diluted to less than a 10% interest that partys interest will be deemed to have been converted into a 0.5% (one-half of 1%) net smelter returns royalty (the "JV NSR Royalty") payable as set forth in Schedule "B" of this Agreement";

3.

Full Force and Effect

The parties hereto agree that, save as amended by this amending Agreement, the Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

4.

Governing Law

This Second Amending Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia.



---

- 2 -



5.

Execution and Delivery

This agreement may be executed in counterparts and delivered by facsimile, each of which when howsoever signed and delivered being deemed an original and together forming one and the same instrument bearing the date first above written notwithstanding the date of actual execution.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written.





BRONX VENTURES INC.

Per:



Authorized Signatory







COLT CAPITAL CORP.

Per:



Authorized Signatory
734 A.2d 1282

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Christopher CAMPBELL, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 3, 1999.

Decided Sept. 9, 1999.

Joseph C. Madenspacher, Dist. Atty., Susan E. Moyer, Asst. Dist. Atty., District Attorney’s Office, for Com.

James J. Karl, Chief Public Defender, Public Defender’s Office, for Christopher Campbell.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas dated October 21, 1998. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
1 - ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

SAGE REDWIND,

No. 3:14-cv-01699-AC

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.

WESTERN UNION, LLC., 

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [183] on May 2, 2016, 

in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The 

matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 72(b).

Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. 

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, 

the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's 

Case 3:14-cv-01699-AC Document 188 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 2
2 - ORDER

report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United 

States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes there is no basis 

to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court also reviewed the pertinent portions of 

the record de novo and finds no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & 

Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [183]. 

Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [95] is granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this __________ day of ___________________ , 2016.

_________________________________________ 

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01699-AC Document 188 Filed 06/16/16 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1960 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1960

To allow the National Park Service to acquire certain land for addition 
  to the Wilderness Battlefield, as previously authorized by law, by 
              purchase or exchange as well as by donation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 21, 1998

  Mr. Warner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow the National Park Service to acquire certain land for addition 
  to the Wilderness Battlefield, as previously authorized by law, by 
              purchase or exchange as well as by donation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION TO WILDERNESS BATTLEFIELD.

    Section 2 of Public Law 102-541 (16 U.S.C. 525k note; 106 Stat. 
3565) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking the colon and all that 
        follows and inserting a period; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``pursuant to this 
        section'' and inserting ``that are designated `P04-04' on the 
        map described in subsection (a)(2)''.
                                 <all>
```
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60224

Summary Calendar

__________________

GREG DANIEL SIMMONS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI;

 VERNETTA P. FAIRLEY,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:93-CV-148

- - - - - - - - - -

December 1, 1995

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Greg Daniel Simmons appeals from the district court's order

dismissing his complaint with prejudice. He argues that he

presented sufficient evidence of discrimination, that the

defendants failed to accommodate his disability, and that the

district court erred in granting the defendants' motion to quash

his subpoenas duces tecum. Our review of the record reveals that

the evidence amply supports the district court's findings that
Simmons was discharged because he made excessive errors and not

for any discriminatory reason. Those findings are not clearly

erroneous. We also conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion in granting the defendants' motion to

suppress.

AFFIRMED.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 U.S. Meat Animal Research Center: Clay Center, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    WGS
                        WGS main page
                                    Cattle reference (v2.9)
                                    Cattle extended (v1.0)
                                    Sheep reference (v2.4)
                                    Sheep extended (v1.0)
                                    Sheep ISGC75
                                    Species mapped to cattle
                                    Species mapped to sheep
                                    Cell lines
                    USMARC Research Units
                        Animal Health Genomics
                                    Genetics and Animal Breeding
                                    Livestock Bio-systems
                                    Meat Safety & Quality
                                    Nutrition, Growth and PhysiologySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




- ARS Careers
- ARS Jobs at USAJOBS
- Careers

Internshipsheadline bar Careers
               Summer Internship Program


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000825247
<NAME>                        Enex Oil & Gas Income Program III - Series 5, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1995
<CASH>                                         13280
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26632
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               43327
<PP&E>                                         3554081
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3203759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 393649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          66570
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     193372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   393649
<SALES>                                        312547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               361136
<CGS>                                          208595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  295815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               52387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12934
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the HEAL (Helping to End Addiction Long-Term) Multi-Disciplinary Working Group, September 01, 2021, 10:30 a.m. to September 02, 2021, 03:45 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 1, Wilson Hall, 1 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 10, 2021, FR Doc 2021-17012, 86 FR 43669.                

                    This notice is being amended to update the meeting times for the HEAL Multi-Disciplinary Working Group Meeting on September 1-2, 2021. Open: September 01, 2021, 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.; Closed: September 01, 2021, 12:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.; Closed: September 02, 2021, 11:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The meeting is partially Closed to the public. The open portion of the meeting will be live webcast at:                     *https://videocast.nih.gov/​.*

Dated: August 18, 2021.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-18048 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P