alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DataWave Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/     Joshua EmanuelJoshua Emanuel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30773 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OBID ABDULLAH ALKUNIFED, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CR-24-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Obid Abdullah Alkunifed has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Alkunifed’s contention that counsel was ineffective for collaborating with the Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) toNo. 97-30773 -2- close his case and his contention that the AUSA induced him to plead guilty in exchange for legal permanent residence are not sufficiently developed in the record before us; as to those contentions only, Alkunifed’s appeal is DISMISSED without prejudice to Alkunifed’s ability to raise those contentions in a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1988); see also United States v. Birdwell , 887 F. 2d 643, 645 (5th Cir. 1989). FURTHER, the defendant’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Carl Hayden Bee Research Center: Tucson, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Information
                        Africanized Honey Bees
                                    Bee Safety
                                    Online Books
                                    Other NewsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Tucson, Arizona Carl Hayden Bee Research Center People & Locations







Hana  Peck
                        Carl Hayden Bee Research Center

                        




                        
                        Biological Aid
                        Phone: (520) 647-9124
                        
                        
                        Fax: (520) 670-6493(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.

The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.* Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than September 28, 2021.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Holly A. Rieser, Manager) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can also be sent electronically to *Comments.applications@stls.frb.org:*

1. *Poplar Bluff Bancorp, Inc., Poplar Bluff, Missouri;* to become a bank holding company by acquiring First Missouri State Bank, Poplar Bluff, Missouri.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 24, 2021.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-18561 Filed 8-27-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
1 – OPINION AND ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

VINCENT ROSENBALM,

No. 3:15-cv-01701-PK

Plaintiff,

OPINION AND ORDER 

v.

LINETTE BOGDAN; UNITED STATES 

GOLF ASSOCIATION,

 Defendants. 

MOSMAN, J., 

On October 7, 2016, Magistrate Judge Papak issued his Findings and Recommendation 

(“F&R”) [32], recommending that Defendants’ Motion for Terminating Sanctions or, 

Alternatively, for Summary Judgment [23] should be GRANTED. Plaintiff filed his Objections 

to the F&R [35] on October 20, 2016, and Defendants filed their Response [36] on November 3, 

2016. For the reasons stated below, I ADOPT the F&R. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

Case 3:15-cv-01701-PK Document 38 Filed 12/01/16 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon careful review, I agree with Judge Papak’s recommendation that this case should be 

dismissed with prejudice for Plaintiff’s complete refusal to engage in the discovery process. 

Dismissal of the case renders the alternative motion for summary judgment moot. This is 

consistent with my reading of Judge Papak’s F&R; I make no ruling on summary judgment 

because the terminating sanctions moot the summary judgment motion. Therefore, I ADOPT 

Judge Papak’s F&R [32].

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 1st day of December, 2016. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman_________

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-01701-PK Document 38 Filed 12/01/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                          |  |                  
|------------------------- |  | -----------------
|By:                       |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer  

Date: August 9, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1568 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1568

To provide for the rescheduling of flunitrazepam into schedule I of the 
           Controlled Substances Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 1997

   Mr. Biden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the rescheduling of flunitrazepam into schedule I of the 
           Controlled Substances Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESCHEDULING.

    Notwithstanding sections 201 and 202 (a) and (b) of the Controlled 
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811, 812 (a), (b)) respecting the scheduling 
of controlled substances, the Attorney General shall, by order, 
transfer flunitrazepam from schedule IV of such Act to schedule I of 
such Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 237/9 Oc

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 237 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 509 October 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 237

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 509 October 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM THIRD COUNTRIES |
| 2007/C 237/01 | List of agencies and laboratories which third countries have made responsible for completing the documents which must accompany each consignment of wine imported into the Community (Article 29 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM THIRD COUNTRIES

2007/C 237/01

List of agencies and laboratories which third countries have made responsible for completing the documents which must accompany each consignment of wine imported into the Community (Article 29 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
CHARLES L. MORRIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4368

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

T. Michael Jones, Judge.

Charles L. Morris, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1629

To suspend temporarily the duty on the synthetic organic coloring matter

c.i. pigment yellow 110.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 11, 1998

Mr. ROTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on the synthetic organic

coloring matter c.i. pigment yellow 110.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON C.I. PIG4 MENT YELLOW 110.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:
2

•S 1629 IS

‘‘ 9902.32.05 Benzoic acid,

2,3,4,5-tetrachloro-6-cyano-

,methyl ester, reaction products

with pphenylenediamine

and sodium methoxide (CAS No.

106276-80-6)

(provided for in

subheading

3204.17.04) ......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2000 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research: Columbia, MO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ARS Oppportunities
                        ARS OpportunitiesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Columbia, Missouri Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research People & Locations







Edward  Winchester

(Ed)
                        Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research

                        




                        
                        Hydrologic Technician
                        Phone: (573) 882-1114
                        
                        
                        Fax: (573) 882-1115(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
1 – ORDER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

NORTHWEST BANK f/k/a NORTHWEST 

SAVINGS BANK, a Pennsylvania state-chartered 

savings association,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MCKEE FAMILY FARMS, INC. et al., 

Defendants.

Civil No. 3:15-cv-01576-MO 

 ORDER 

MOSMAN, J., 

Based on Defendant Mark Cox’s Motion for Summary Judgment [172] and Plaintiff’s 

Response [190] which does not contest Defendant’s motion, I GRANT Defendant’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment [172]. 

DATED this _8th_ day of April, 2016. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman_________ 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01576-MO Document 222 Filed 04/08/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datawave Systems Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Josh Emanuel, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 12, 2003

/s/ Josh Emanuel	
Josh Emanuel, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)