Page 1 - INTEL CORPORATION’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL 

PAGES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING 

Renée E. Rothauge, OSB #903712 

ReneeRothauge@markowitzherbold.com 

MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC 

Suite 3000, Pacwest Center 

1211 SW Fifth Avenue 

Portland, OR 97204-3730 

Telephone: (503) 295-3085 

Fax: (503) 323-9105 

Michael J. Summersgill (pro hac vice) 

Jordan L. Hirsch (pro hac vice) 

Sean K. Thompson (pro hac vice) 

WILMERHALE LLP 

60 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

(617) 526-6000 

Grant K. Rowan (pro hac vice) 

WILMERHALE LLP 

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

(202) 663-6000 

Arthur W. Coviello (pro hac vice) 

WILMERHALE LLP 

950 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

(650) 858-6000 

Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

MEMORY INTEGRITY, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

 v. 

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-00262-SI 

INTEL CORPORATION’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING 

Expedited Consideration Requested 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-SI Document 110 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 - INTEL CORPORATION’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL 

PAGES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING 

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LR 7-1 

Pursuant to LR 7-1, counsel for Intel Corporation (“Intel”) certify that they have 

conferred with Memory Integrity LLC’s (“MI”) counsel, and MI does not oppose this motion. 

MI also agrees that expedited consideration of this motion is appropriate. 

MOTION 

Pursuant to LR 7-2(b)(1), Intel moves this Court for an order allowing the parties to each 

file 75-page Opening Claim Construction Briefs (due September 30, 2015) and 75-page 

Answering Claim Construction Briefs (due October 28, 2015) (“Claim Construction Briefing”) 

(Dkt 88). 

MEMORANDUM 

This case involves 5 patents, 118 claims, and 24 proposed claim terms for construction. 

Given the complexity of the technology at issue, the number of asserted claims, and the resulting 

number of claim terms potentially in dispute, the parties would not be able to make complete 

arguments for the disputed claim constructions within the 35 pages allowed by LR 7-2(b)(1). 

The parties agree that allowing 75 pages, respectively, for the opening and responsive Claim 

Construction Briefing will enable the parties to make a full and clear record for the Court and 

will help to ensure efficient claim construction proceedings. The parties seek expedited 

consideration of this motion so that the parties have sufficient time to prepare their Opening 

Claim Construction Briefs within the page limits allowed by the Court by September 30, 2015. 

CONCLUSION 

In light of the complexity of the Claim Construction Briefing required for this case and 

the benefits additional briefing will provide to the Court and the parties, Intel respectfully 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-SI Document 110 Filed 08/19/15 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 - INTEL CORPORATION’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL 

PAGES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING 

requests that the Court enter an order on an expedited basis allowing Opening and Answering 

Claim Construction Briefs up to 75 pages. 

 DATED this 19th day of August, 2015. 

MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC

By: /s/ Renée E. Rothauge

Renée E. Rothauge

OSB #903712 

(503) 295-3085 

Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

Case 3:15-cv-00262-SI Document 110 Filed 08/19/15 Page 3 of 3