Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Notices 47619 

8On April 26, 2011, Commerce amended the 

order to include dusted shrimp, pursuant to the 

U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) decision in 

Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United 

States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (CIT 2010) and the 

U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) 

determination, which found the domestic like 

product to include dusted shrimp. See Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, India, the 

People’s Republic of China, Thailand, and the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended 

Antidumping Duty Orders in Accordance with Final 

Court Decision, 76 FR 23277 (April 26, 2011); see 

also Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. 

United States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (CIT 2010); and 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, China, 

India, Thailand, and Vietnam (Investigation Nos. 

731–TA–1063, 1064, 1066–1068 (Review), USITC 

Publication 4221, March 2011. 

1See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 11233 

(February 24, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Bebitz’s Letter, ‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges 

from India: Case Brief,’’ dated April 2, 2021. 

3On April 30, 2021, we rejected Chandan’s case 

brief for relying on untimely-filed new factual 

information (NFI). See Commerce Letter, 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Rejection of New 

Factual Information,’’ dated April 30, 2021. 

Therefore, on May 4, 2021, Chandan refiled its case 

brief after removing the NFI. See Chandan’s Letter, 

‘‘Certain Stainless Steel Flanges from India (A–533– 

877—AR1), Submission of Case Brief for Chandan 

Steel (Refile),’’ dated May 4, 2021. 

4See Pradeep Metals’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Stainless 

Steel Flanges from India (A–533–877—AR1), 

Submission of Case Brief for Pradeep Metals 

Limited,’’ dated April 2, 2021. 5See Balkrishna et al./Bebitz’s Letter, ‘‘Stainless 

Steel Flanges from India: ‘All Other’ Case Brief,’’ 

dated April 2, 2021. 6On July 19, 2021, we rejected the petitioner’s 

rebuttal brief for containing citations to untimelyfiled NFI submitted by Chandan. See Commerce’s 

Letter, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 

of Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Rejection of 

Petitioner’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated July 19, 2021. On 

July 21, 2021, the petitioner refiled its rebuttal brief 

after removing the NFI. See Petitioner’s Letter, 

‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Resubmission 

of Petitioner’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated July 21, 2021. 

7See Hearing Transcript, ‘‘The Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Public Hearing,’’ 

dated May 11, 2021. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from 

India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019,’’ dated June 2, 2021. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from 

India: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated August 

20, 2021 (Issues and Decision Memorandum) which 

is dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice. 

10 Id. 

11 Id. 

12See Preliminary Results (citing Albemarle Corp. 

v. United States, 821 F. 3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016) 

(Albemarle)). 

13See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 3. 

and for customs purposes only and are not 

dispositive, but rather the written description 

of the scope of this order is dispositive.8

[FR Doc. 2021–18368 Filed 8–25–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–877] 

Stainless Steel Flanges From India: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that exporters/ 

producers of stainless steel flanges from 

India made sales at prices below normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

March 28, 2018, through September 30, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable August 26, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benito Ballesteros, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7425. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 24, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 On 

April 2, 2021, we received timely-filed 

case briefs from Bebitz Flanges Works 

Private Limited (Bebitz) 2 Chandan Steel 

Limited (Chandan),3 and Pradeep 

Metals Limited,4 and a joint brief from 

Balkrishna et al. and Bebitz.5 On April 

9, 2021, the petitioner timely filed its 

rebuttal brief.6 On May 11, 2021, 

Commerce held a public hearing, 

limited to the issues raised in the case 

and rebuttal briefs.7 On June 2, 2021, we 

extended the deadline for the final 

results of this review until August 20, 

2021.8 For a complete description of the 

events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.9

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is stainless steel flanges from India. For 

a complete description of the scope of 

this order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.10

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. Attached to this 

notice, in Appendix I, is a list of the 

issues which parties raised. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html/. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties, and for the reasons explained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

we made no changes to the Preliminary 

Results.11

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

In accordance with the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s 

decision in Albemarle,12 Commerce 

continues to assign to the companies not 

individually examined (see Appendix II 

for a full list of these companies) a 

margin of 145.25 percent, which is the 

dumping margin assigned to mandatory 

respondent Chandan. Commerce has 

addressed arguments from various 

interested parties regarding this rate, 

which we assigned to the non-examined 

companies in the Preliminary Results, 

and, for the final results, the 

determination remains unchanged, as 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.13

Final Results of Administrative Review 

We are assigning the following 

dumping margin to the firms listed 

below for the POR, March 28, 2018, 

through September 30, 2019: 

Exporter/producer Dumping margin 

(percent) 

Cash deposit rate 

(adjusted for 

subsidy offsets) 

(percent) 14

Chandan Steel Limited ................................................................................................................................ 145.25 140.38 

Companies Not Individually Examined (excluding Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited) 15 .................... 145.25 140.38 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
47620 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Notices 

14See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Final 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value and Final Affirmative Critical 

Circumstance Determination, 83 FR 40745 (August 

16, 2018). 

15See Appendix II. 

16See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 4. 

17See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

18See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: 

Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 50639 (October 9, 

2018) (Order). 

19 In the Initiation Notice, this company also 

appeared as ‘‘Echjay Forgings Private Limited.’’ See 

Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 67712, 67714 

(December 11, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 

20 In the Initiation Notice, this company also 

appeared as ‘‘Jay Jagdamba Ltd.’’ Id. 

Exporter/producer Dumping margin 

(percent) 

Cash deposit rate 

(adjusted for 

subsidy offsets) 

(percent) 14

Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited 16 ..................................................................................................... 145.25 145.25 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce discloses the 

calculations performed in its analysis to 

parties in a review within five days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

final results, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). However, because 

Commerce applied a rate based on total 

AFA to the mandatory respondent in 

this review, in accordance with section 

776 of the Act, there are no calculations 

to disclose. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce has 

determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. We 

intend to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication).17

For the final results, we will instruct 

CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment 

rate equal to the dumping margins 

shown above to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which 

were produced and/or exported by 

Chandan or exported by the companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination. We intend to instruct CBP 

to take into account the ‘‘provisional 

measures deposit cap,’’ in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(d). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of the final 

results of this administrative review for 

all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

for by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Chandan and 

the companies not individually 

examined will be equal to the rates 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered by this review but 

covered by a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding; 

(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

by this review or the original less-thanfair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate 

for all other producers or exporters will 

continue to be 14.29 percent,18 the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: August 20, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Application of AFA to 

Chandan 

Comment 2: Selection of the AFA Rate 

Comment 3: All-Others Rate for NonExamined Companies 

Comment 4: Export Subsidies Offset 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Non-Examined 

Companies 

1. Arien Global 

2. Armstrong International Pvt. Ltd 

3. Avinimetal 

4. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd 

5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited 

6. Bee Gee Enterprises 

7. Bsl Freight Solutions Pvt., Ltd 

8. CD Industries (Prop. Kisaan Engineering 

Works Pvt. Ltd) 

9. Cipriani Harrison Valves Pvt. Ltd 

10. CTL Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd 

11. Echjay Forgings Private Ltd 19

12. Fivebros Forgings Pvt. Ltd 

13. Fluid Controls Pvt. Ltd 

14. Geodis Oversea Pvt., Ltd 

15. Globelink WW India Pvt., Ltd 

16. Goodluck India Ltd 

17. Hilton Metal Forging Limited 

18. Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd 

19. JAY JAGDAMBA FORGINGS PRIVATE 

LIMITED 

20. JAY JAGDAMBA LIMITED 20

21. JAY JAGDAMBA PROFILE PRIVATE 

LIMITED 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Notices 47621 

1See CHAP’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Softwood Lumber 

from Canada: L’Atelier de Re ́adaptation au Travail 

de Beauce Inc. Request for Changed Circumstances 

Reviews,’’ dated May 5, 2021 (CCR Request). 

2See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Antidumping Duty Order and Partial 

Amended Final Determination, 83 FR 350 (January 

3, 2018) (Order). 

3See CCR Request at 1–2. 

4 Id. at 2–6. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Changed 

Circumstances Review of Certain Softwood Lumber 

Products from Canada: Supplemental 

Questionnaire,’’ dated June 8, 2021. 

6See CHAP’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Softwood Lumber 

from Canada: Supplemental Questionnaire 

Response,’’ dated June 24, 2021. 

7See Initiation and Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Softwood 

Lumber Products from Canada, 86 FR 36525 (July 

12, 2021) (Initiation and Preliminary Results CCR), 

and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

8See Initiation and Preliminary Results CCR, 86 

FR at 36526. 

9For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Initiation and Preliminary Results CCR 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (no changes in 

these final results). 

22. Kisaan Die Tech 

23. Kunj Forgings Pvt. Ltd 

24. Montane Shipping Pvt., Ltd 

25. Noble Shipping Pvt. Ltd 

26. Paramount Forge 

27. Pashupati Tradex Pvt., Ltd 

28. Peekay Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd 

29. Pradeep Metals Ltd 

30. R D Forge Pvt., Ltd 

31. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd 

32. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd 

33. Safewater Lines (I) Pvt. Ltd 

34. Saini Flange Pvt. Ltd 

35. SAR Transport Systems 

36. Shilpan Steelcast Pvt. Ltd 

37. Shree Jay Jagdamba Flanges Pvt. Ltd 

38. Teamglobal Logistics Pvt. Ltd 

39. Technical Products Corporation 

40. Technocraft Industries India Ltd 

41. Transworld Global 

42. VEEYES Engineering Pvt. Ltd 

43. Vishal Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd 

44. Yusen Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd 

[FR Doc. 2021–18367 Filed 8–25–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–857] 

Certain Softwood Lumber Products 

From Canada: Notice of Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 12, 2021, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the initiation and preliminary 

results of a changed circumstances 

review (CCR) of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on certain softwood lumber 

products from Canada. For these final 

results, Commerce continues to find that 

CHAP Alliance, Inc. (CHAP) is the 

successor-in-interest to L’Atelier de 

Re ́adaptation au Travail de Beauce Inc. 

(L’Atelier) in the context of the AD 

order on certain softwood lumber 

products from Canada. 

DATES: Applicable August 26, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maisha Cryor, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5831. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 5, 2021, CHAP requested 1

that, pursuant to section 751(b) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) 

and 19 CFR 351.216, Commerce conduct 

an expedited CCR of the AD order on 

certain softwood lumber products from 

Canada 2 to confirm that CHAP is the 

successor-in-interest to L’Atelier, and 

accordingly to assign it the cash deposit 

rate of L’Atelier.3 In its submission, 

CHAP states that while L’Atelier 

undertook its name, the company is 

otherwise primarily unchanged.4 On 

June 8, 2021, Commerce informed 

CHAP that it required additional 

information in order to determine 

whether to initiate the requested CCR.5

On June 24, 2021, CHAP provided the 

requested information.6

On July 6, 2021, Commerce initiated 

a CCR and preliminarily determined 

that CHAP is the successor-in-interest to 

L’Atelier.7 In the Initiation and 

Preliminary Results CCR, Commerce 

provided all interested parties with an 

opportunity to comment.8 However, we 

received no comments. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is softwood lumber, siding, 

flooring and certain other coniferous 

wood (softwood lumber products). 

Softwood lumber product imports are 

generally entered under Chapter 44 of 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

Order is dispositive.9

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

For the reasons stated in the Initiation 

and Preliminary Results CCR, 

Commerce continues to find that CHAP 

is the successor-in-interest to L’Atelier. 

As a result of this determination and 

consistent with established practice, we 

find that CHAP should receive the cash 

deposit rates previously assigned to 

L’Atelier. Consequently, Commerce will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection to suspend liquidation of all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

produced or exported by L’Atelier and 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of this notice in the 

Federal Register at the cash deposit rate 

in effect for L’Atelier. This cash deposit 

requirement shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing this determination and 

publishing these final results and notice 

in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) 

and 777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.216(e), 351.221(b), and 

351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: August 20, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–18369 Filed 8–25–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–884] 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From the Republic of Korea: Final 

Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. 

(Hyundai Steel), a producer and 

exporter of certain hot-rolled steel flat 

products (hot-rolled steel) from the 

Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of 

review (POR) is January 1, 2018, 

through December 31, 2018. 

DATES: Applicable August 26, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nathan James, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5305. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of this review on February 22, 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES