alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of All Grade Mining, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Kouletas, President of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Gary Kouletas
 Gary Kouletas
 President (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 Date: July 3, 2013
 
 
 This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hybred International, Inc. and will be retained by Hybred International, Inc.. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.












---
#### Dwayne Moore, Appellant, v Federated Department Stores, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[942 NYS2d 513]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered July 16, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs motions to strike defendants’ answer and to compel responses to discovery, and granted defendants’ cross motions for sanctions to the extent of directing plaintiffs counsel to, among other things, pay $2,000 to the Lawyer’s Fund for Client Protection, unanimously dismissed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about September 27, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant Macy’s motion to compel *639plaintiffs compliance with discovery, and denied plaintiffs motion to stay the order entered July 16, 2010 pending appeal, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Any right of direct appeal from the intermediate orders terminated with entry of the final judgment dismissing this wrongful termination action for failure to prosecute *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). Plaintiff did not appeal from the final judgment, and there is no basis for deeming his appeals from the intermediate orders as having been taken from the subsequent judgment *(cf.*CPLR 5501 [c]; 5520 [c]).

Were we to consider plaintiffs arguments on appeal, we would nonetheless find them unavailing. The court properly denied plaintiffs motions to strike and compel, as there was no basis in the record to find defendants’ conduct in the discovery process to be willful, contumacious, or in bad faith *(see Ayala v Lincoln Med. & Mental Health Ctr.,*92 AD3d 542 [2012]). With respect to the court’s imposition of sanctions upon plaintiffs counsel, counsel did not appeal from the order or the subsequent judgment awarding sanctions, and plaintiff was not aggrieved by the award and lacks standing to challenge it *(see generally*CPLR 5511; *Matter of Kyle v Lebovits,*58 AD3d 521 [2009], *lv dismissed and denied*13 NY3d 765 [2009], *cert denied*559 US —, 130 S Ct 1524 [2010]). Plaintiff was also not aggrieved by the grant of defendant Macy’s motion to compel discovery, as plaintiff did not oppose the motion *(see Darras v Romans,*85 AD3d 710, 711 [2011]). To the extent plaintiff challenges the denial of his motion for a stay of enforcement of the order entered July 16, 2010 pending his appeal from the order, his argument is moot *(see Diane v Ricale Taxi, Inc.,*26 AD3d 232, 232 [2006]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Acosta and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 31899(U).]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
<CURRENCY>        U.S. Dollars

<S>                            <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1999     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999     SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                      1                    1
<CASH>                               0                4,534
<SECURITIES>                         0               13,751
<RECEIVABLES>                        0               39,800
<ALLOWANCES>                         0                 (622)
<INVENTORY>                          0                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     0               58,820
<PP&E>                               0               11,213
<DEPRECIATION>                       0               (4,331)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       0               95,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                0               38,298
<BONDS>                              0                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0                    0
<PREFERRED>                          0                    0
<COMMON>                             0                  107
<OTHER-SE>                           0              56,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         0              95,155
<SALES>                              0                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                25,479              69,695
<CGS>                           13,282              37,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   13,282              37,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 8,084              23,997
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  4,206               9,903
<INCOME-TAX>                    (1,752)             (4,092)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              2,454               5,811
<DISCONTINUED>                       0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0                   0
<CHANGES>                            0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                     2,454               5,811
<EPS-BASIC>                      .24                 .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .23                 .50


</TABLE>
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1667

To amend section 2164 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility of dependents of United States Customs Service employees to

enroll in Department of Defense dependents schools in Puerto Rico.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 23, 1998

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend section 2164 of title 10, United States Code,

to clarify the eligibility of dependents of United States

Customs Service employees to enroll in Department of

Defense dependents schools in Puerto Rico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1667 IS

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF CUSTOMS

2 SERVICE EMPLOYEE DEPENDENTS TO EN3 ROLL IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPEND4 ENTS SCHOOLS IN PUERTO RICO.

5 (a) CLARIFICATION.—Section 2164(c) of title 10,

6 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

7 following:

8 ‘‘(4)(A) A dependent of a United States Customs

9 Service employee who resides in Puerto Rico but not on

10 a military installation may enroll in an educational pro11 gram provided by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (a)

12 in Puerto Rico.

13 ‘‘(B) Notwithstanding the limitation on duration of

14 enrollment set forth in paragraph (2), a dependent de15 scribed in subparagraph (A) who is enrolled in an edu16 cation program described in that subparagraph may be re17 moved from the program only for good cause (as deter18 mined by the Secretary).

19 ‘‘(C) In the event of the death in the line of duty

20 of an employee described in subparagraph (A), a depend21 ent of the employee may remain enrolled in an educational

22 program described in that subparagraph until—

23 ‘‘(i) the dependent completes the secondary

24 education associated with such educational program;

25 or
3

•S 1667 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) the dependent is removed for good cause

2 (as so determined).’’.

3 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub4 section (a) shall take effect on the date of enactment of

5 this Act and apply to academic years beginning on or after

6 that date.

Æ
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-24-00006-CV

R. WAYNE JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

ROBERT RAMIREZ, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 62nd District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 92217

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

R. Wayne Johnson, proceeding pro se, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s 

order dismissing his case with prejudice for failure to comply with his obligations under Section 

11.101 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.

§ 11.101. Upon this Court’s review of Johnson’s filing, we noted a potential defect in our

jurisdiction over this appeal. 

Section 11.102(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code provides, “A vexatious 

litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 is prohibited from filing, pro se, new 

litigation in a court to which the order applies without seeking the permission of . . . the local 

administrative judge.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.102(a).1 Although the clerk of 

this Court may file an appeal from a prefiling order, the clerk “may not file a litigation, original 

proceeding, appeal, or other claim presented, pro se, by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling 

order under Section 11.101 unless the litigant obtains an order from the appropriate local 

administrative judge described by Section 11.102(a) permitting the filing.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. &

REM. CODE ANN. § 11.103. 

The record in this matter is devoid of an order from the appropriate local administrative 

judge permitting the filing of this appeal. By letter dated February 23, 2024, we notified Johnson

of this potential defect in our jurisdiction and afforded him the opportunity to show this Court 

how it had jurisdiction over this proceeding. We further informed Johnson that he was required

1We have previously dealt with Johnson in his capacity as a vexatious litigant. See, e.g., In re Johnson, No. 06-11-

00116-CV, 2011 WL 5135298 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Oct. 28, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Johnson, 

No. 06-11-00096-CV, 2011 WL 4686502 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Oct. 7, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
3

to respond by March 14, 2024, and that his failure to do so would result in dismissal of his case

for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Johnson did not file a response. We,

therefore, conclude that his case is ripe for dismissal. 

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Charles van Cleef

Justice

Date Submitted: March 22, 2024

Date Decided: March 25, 2024
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ralph T Finkenbrink                          
|Ralph T. Finkenbrink                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                 
|Dated: November 10, 2008
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Disease Lab: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Cereal Rust Bulletins
                    PublicationsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Cereal Disease Lab People & Locations







Randall W Kiehne

(Randy)
                        Cereal Disease Lab

                        




                        
                        Facilities Operation Specialist
                        Phone: (651) 649-5047
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47290-47291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18261]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of commission public business meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, August 20, 2021, 12 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: Meeting to take place by telephone and is open to the public 
by telephone: 1-800-635-7637, Conference ID #: 8000136.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelia Rorison: 202-376-7700; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82f2f7e0eeebe1e3e4e4e3ebf0f1c2f7f1e1e1f0ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="265653444a4f45474040474f545566535545455408414950">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Government in 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding 
a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month of August. 
This meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time 
transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in 
English) on Friday, August 20, 2021, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-only translation that 
occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.

[[Page 47291]]

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Business Meeting
    A. Presentations from Advisory Committees to the Commission on 
Recent Reports/Memo Releases
    B. Discussion and Vote on Iowa Advisory Committee Chair Appointment
    C. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments
    D. Discussion and Vote on the Release of The Civil Rights 
Implications of Cash Bail: Briefing Report Before the U.S. Commission 
on Civil Rights
    E. Management and Operations
    <bullet> Staff Director's Report
III. Adjourn Meeting

    Dated: August 19, 2021.
Angelia Rorison,
USCCR Media and Communications Director.
[FR Doc. 2021-18261 Filed 8-20-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1844 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1844

      To suspend temporarily the duty on calcium oxytetracycline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 1998

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on calcium oxytetracycline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CALCIUM OXYTETRACYCLINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.29.43      Calcium                                                                                  
                        oxytetracycline                                                                         
                        (CAS No. 79-57-2)                                                                       
                        (provided for in                                                                        
                        subheading                                                                              
                        2941.30.00)......  Free         No change         No change         On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/02              
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northwest Watershed Research Center: Boise, ID
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Scientific Products
                        Publications
                                    Models
                                    Published Datasets
                                    Snow Pack Reports
                    Reynolds Creek
                        Watershed Description
                                    Data AccessSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Boise, Idaho Northwest Watershed Research Center People & Locations







Veronica  Porter
                        Northwest Watershed Research Center

                        




                        
                        Research Affiliate
                        Phone: (208) 422-0700
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov