alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10090

(Summary Calendar)

MARK S. VELLA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

IRVING TOOL & MANUFACTURING 

COMPANY, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division

(3:95-CV-0304-T)

September 20, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Irving Tool and

Manufacturing Company (Irving) on Plaintiff-Appellant Mark S.

Vella’s Title VII retaliation claim. Vella asserts that the
district court erred in determining that insufficient summary

judgment evidence exists to create a genuine issue of material fact

as to whether Irving’s proffered business reason for firing Vella

was a pretext for discrimination. In conducting our de novo

review, we carefully evaluated the record on appeal, the arguments

of counsel for both parties as set forth in their briefs to this

court, and the applicable law, and we have come to the same

conclusions as did the district court in its well-reasoned and

thoughtful opinion. We therefore affirm in all respects the

district court’s grant of summary judgment for the same reasons

expressed therein by the district court.

AFFIRMED.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory: Mandan, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Employment
                        Work With Us
                                    ARS Vacancies at USDAJOBS
                    Local News
                        INTEGRATOR
                                    Bottom Line Ag SummitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Mandan, North Dakota Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory Docs





- Mandan Historical Society
- History

**Environmental Management Systems** **NGPRL Activities, Practices and Procedures** NGPRL EMS Policy StatementNGPRL ObjectivesNGPRL Recycled Material


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7657

STANLEY HARVEY DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:05-ct-00718)

Submitted: April 9, 2007 Decided: May 7, 2007

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Harvey Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Michelle T. Fuseyamore, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Harvey Davis appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant and dismissing Davis’

complaint brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v.

United States, No. 5:05-ct-00718 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2006). We

grant Davis’ motion for leave to present additional information.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2
                                                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                                                ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of
Lenox Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2002 (the Report), I, John C. Lame, Chief Executive Officer
and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1)   
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   
 The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

/s/John C. Lame
John C. Lame, Chief Executive Officer and President

August 9, 2002

#### End of Filing
Order entered April 23, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00170-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

CARMEN SIFUENTES, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-03940

ORDER

We GRANT the April 16, 2013 motion of Toni Reagor, Official Court Reporter for the 

68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, for an extension of time to file the 

reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed on or before May 28, 2013.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 2 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 3 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 4 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 5 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 6 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 7 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 8 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 9 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 10 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 11 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 12 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 13 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 14 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 15 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 16 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 17 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 18 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 19 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 20 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 21 of 22
Case 1:15-cv-01688-MA Document 19 Filed 10/11/16 Page 22 of 22
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND FROM THE INCOME STATEMENT FOR
THE 6 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                    529,843
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                           2,189,660
<ALLOWANCES>                               88,470
<INVENTORY>                             5,074,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        7,945,164
<PP&E>                                  3,977,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         13,417,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,505,866
<BONDS>                                 3,208,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                  105,603
<OTHER-SE>                              6,395,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           13,417,779
<SALES>                                 5,729,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        5,729,942
<CGS>                                   3,628,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           2,248,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (17,760)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        217,658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (346,895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (346,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (346,895)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.10)



</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1596

CHRISTINE M. OWEN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LIBERTY UNIVERSITY; NICOLE M. DILELLA, both individually and in her official capacity as Liberty University CES faculty/professor; MARY DEACON, both individually and in her official capacity as Liberty University CES faculty and CACREP liaison; DENISE DANIEL, both individually and in her official capacity as Liberty University CES faculty/professor; ELIAS MOITINHO, both individually and in his official capacity as Liberty University CES faculty; ERIC CAMDEN , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Lynchburg

. Norman K. Moon , Senior District Judge. ( 6:19

- cv - 00007

- NKM

- RSB )

Submitted : December 8, 2021 Decided: January 13, 2022

Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Christine M. Owen, Appellant Pro Se. Heidi Elizabeth Siegmund, Summer Speight, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Christine M. Owen appeals the district cour t’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Owen’s civil complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ; granting Defendants’ motion to strike Owen’s surreply; and dismissing as moot all outstanding motions, including Owen’s motion for summary judgment . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Owen v. Liberty
Univ. , No. 6:19

- cv - 00007

- NKM

- RSB (W.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
( 

( 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

MELISSA VAN PA TIEN, person 

representative for the estate of Melinda 

Van Patten, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WASHINGTON COUNTY, by and the 

Washington County Sheriff's Office, 

Defendant. 

We, the jury, find as follows: 

Case No. 3:15-cv-00891-AC 

VERDICT FORM 

1. Did Melinda Van Patten's estate establish by a preponderance of the evidence that there was 

probable cause to believe that Ken V anPattenhad placed Melinda V anPatteninfear of imminent serious 

physical injury on May 26, 2013? 

---Yes -~-x No 

PAGE 1 -VERDICT FORM 

Case 3:15-cv-00891-AC Document 140 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 2
( 

lf you answered "Yes" to Question No. 1, proceed to Question No. 2. 

lfyou answered "No" to Question No. 1, you are finished. Your presidingjuror should sign 

and date this verdict form. 

2. Was the Deputies' failure to arrest Ken Van Patten the but-for cause of Ken Van Patten killing 

Melinda Van Patten on May 27, 2013, resulting in damages to Melinda Van Patten's estate? 

Yes ---- ____ No 

lfyou answered "Yes" to Question No. 2, proceed to Question No. 3. 

lf you answered "No" to Question No. 2, you are finished. Your presidingjuror should sign 

and date this verdict form. 

3. Wbat are Melinda Van Patten's estate's damages? 

$ ----Economic Damages 

$ Non-economic Damages 

Your presiding juror should sign and date this verdict form. 

DATED this _j_£_ day of July, 2017. 

PRESIDING iuROR 

PAGE 2 - VERDICT FORM 

Case 3:15-cv-00891-AC Document 140 Filed 07/12/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commerce Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank D. Puissegur, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                                   
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 13, 2010 |  | /s/ Frank D. Puissegur                                            
|                    |  | Frank D. Puissegur                                                
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Director
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Crops Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ScientistsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin Vegetable Crops Research People & Locations







Michaela  Taddeini
                        Vegetable Crops Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Laboratory Technical
                        Phone: (608) 262-7922
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          43,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    889,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,160,378
<PP&E>                                         205,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,351,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          518,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,417
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,131,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,351,523
<SALES>                                        386,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               386,406
<CGS>                                          207,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               628,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (449,524)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (528,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (528,755)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (528,755)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (528,755)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CORY BJERKE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE HOME DEPOT, INC., 

Defendant. 

P APAK, Magistrate Judge: 

3:15-CV-1708-PK 

OPINION AND ORDER 

Plaintiff Co1y Bjerke filed this putative class action on his own behalf and on behalf of all 

those similarly situated against defendant The Home Depot, Inc. ("Home Depot") in the 

Multnomah County Circuit Court on July 31, 2015. By and through his complaint, Bjerke 

alleges Home Depot's liability for violation of the federal Fair Credit Rep01iing Act. Home 

Depot removed Bjerke's action to this court effective September 10, 2015 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

Page I - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-01708-PK Document 34 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 2
§ 1441 (a) on the grounds that Bjerke's claim raises a federal question. This comi has original 

jurisdiction over Bjerke's action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and may properly exercise 

jurisdiction on removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. 

Now before the court is Bjerke's motion (#28) to change or transfer venue, by and through 

which Bjerke seeks this court's order transferring this action to the United States District Court 

for the Notihern District of Georgia for contemplated consolidation with Albu v. The Home 

Deport, Inc., Case No. 1:15-CV-412-ELR-JFK (N.D. Ga.). Home Depot does not oppose either 

the requested transfer to the Northern District of Georgia or the contemplated consolidation with 

Albu. 

In light of the parties' agreement that this court would most efficiently be litigated in the 

Northern District of Georgia, Bjerke's unopposed motion is granted. This action is transferred to 

the Northern District of Georgia effective immediately. 

CONCLUSION 

For the reasons set fotih above, Bjerke's motion (#28) is granted and this action is 

transferred to the United States District Comi for the Northern District of Georgia. All pending 

motions are denied as moot with leave to refile before the United States District Comi for the 

Northern District of Georgia. 

DATED this 21st day of October, 2015 .. 

Page 2 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Honorable Paul Papak 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-01708-PK Document 34 Filed 10/21/15 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1657

To suspend temporarily the duty on bis(2,6-dimethoxy-benzoyl)-2,4,4-trimethyl

pentyl phosphinenoxide and 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanone.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on bis(2,6-dimethoxy-benzoyl)-2,4,4-trimethyl pentyl phosphinenoxide and 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanone.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new item:

‘‘ 9902.38.15 bis(2,6-dimethoxy-benzoyl)-

2,4,4-trimethyl pentyl

phosphinenoxide and 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-1-

propanone (provided for in

subheading 3815.90.50) ........ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2000 ’’.
2

•S 1657 IS

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by this

2 section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ