Sa
wh oy

Minute der Form (0698?)

1

United States District Court, Northern District of [linois

Mail AO 450 form.

Copy to judge/magistrate judge.

7126/2002

date mailed notice

courtroom
deputy’s
initials

a 92 Wr 20

Date/time received in
genital Clerk’s Office

SN

sailing deputy initials

¢ of Assigned Judge i Sitting Judge if Other
JY or Magistrate Judge Milton I. Shadur than Assigned Judge
CASE NUMBER 02 C 4806 DATE 7/26/2002
CASE Maurice L. Jones vs. Coca Cola Bottling Co.
TITLE
[In the following box (a) indicate the party filing the motion, e.g., plaintiff, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the nature
MOTION: of the motion being presented,]
DOCKET ENTRY:
ql) im Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]
(2) im Brief in support of motion due
(3) Oo Answer brief to motion due . Reply to answer brief due
4 Oo Ruling/Hearing on set for at
(5) im Status hearing[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for] on set for at
(6) o Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for] on set for at .
(7) oO Trial[set for/re-set for] on at
(8) ia] [Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continued to at
(9) im This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agreement/pursuant to]
CORRCP4(m) OGeneral Rule2l CFRCP41(a\(1) 1 FRCP41(a)(2).
(io) Wf [Other docket entry] _ Enter Memorandum Order. Jones’ application to proceed in forma pauperis
is denied and the Complaint and this action is dismissed because of noncompliance with this Court’s July
12 order.
di) of [For further detail see order attached to the original minute order.]
No notices required, advised in open court. Document
No notices required. Number
number of mario :
UV. | Notices mailed by judge’s staff. JUL J
Notified counsel by telephone. dare op)
Docketing to mail notices. \ Ar
f j
7,



Sey a

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

MAURICE L. JONES,
Plaintiff,

v. No. 02 C 4806

DOCKETEN

COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, J
UL 2 9 2099

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM _ORDER

On July 12, 2002 this Court ordered pro se plaintiff Maurice
Jones (“Jones”) to provide some necessary additional information
in support of his request to go forward with his lawsuit without
prepayment of the $150 filing fee (the financial information he
had originally submitted appeared to indicate that he could
obtain the necessary funds in short order out of his ongoing
unemployment compensation payments). But the specified date
(July 23) has come and gone without Jones having submitted either
payment of the fee or the requested information or any
explanation as to why he might need additional time for either of
those alternatives.

This Court therefore denies Jones leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, and it dismisses his Complaint and this action because
of his noncompliance with the July 12 order. Because Jones (as a
nonlawyer) is presumably unaware of the manner in which he may be
relieved from the effect of this dismissal, he is further advised

that under Fed. R. Civ. P. (*Rule”) 59(e), as tempered by Rule


ow

6(a), he may file a motion to alter or amend the judgment of
dismissal within 14 days after the docketing of the judgment of

dismissal (which will normally take place on July 29).*

TCM. DE weber

Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge

Date: July 26, 2002

+ In that respect, Jones should understand that no
extension of that 14-day period can be granted, because Rule 6 (b)

so provides.