alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commerce Solutions, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel L. Hefner, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                 
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 13, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel L. Hefner                                            
|                       |  |  |  | Daniel L. Hefner Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1656 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1656

To suspend temporarily the duty on bis(2,4,6-trimethyl benzoyl) phenyl 
                            phosphine oxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 1998

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on bis(2,4,6-trimethyl benzoyl) phenyl 
                            phosphine oxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new item:

      

``    9902.32.26     bis(2,4,6-                                                                                 
                      trimethyl                                                                                 
                      benzoyl) phenyl                                                                           
                      phosphine oxide                                                                           
                      (CAS No. 162881-                                                                          
                      26-7) (provided                                                                           
                      for in                                                                                    
                      subheading                                                                                
                      2931.00.30).....  Free              No change        No change        On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/2000            
                                                                                                              ''

    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by this section applies with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1


Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Traffix, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended May 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Date: July 17, 2003                        /s/ Jeffrey L. Schwartz
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           JEFFREY L. SCHWARTZ
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Traffix, Inc. and will be retained
by Traffix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                                                              91
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Stacia N. Almquist, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Union Security Insurance Company; 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: February 29, 2008
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2 



CHAPARRAL ENERGY, INC. 
2020 KEY EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN
AWARD NOTICE


Chaparral Energy, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to the Chaparral Energy, Inc. 2020 Key Executive Incentive Plan (as may be amended, the “Incentive Plan”), hereby grants to the Participant named below the eligibility to receive an incentive-based payment in the amount set forth below (the “Award”).  The Award is subject to all of the terms and conditions as set forth in this Award Notice (this “Notice”) and the Incentive Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein in its entirety.  Except as otherwise indicated, any capitalized term used but not defined shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Incentive Plan.  
	
		
	Participant:
	 

	Grant Date:
	 






Award:


	
			
	Threshold 
(50% of Target Incentive Payment)
	Target Incentive Payment
	Maximum 
(200% of Target Incentive Payment)

	 
	 
	 






Acceptance, Acknowledgment and Receipt    


By accepting the Award, the Participant hereby: 


		
	•
	acknowledges receipt of, and represents that the Participant understands, this Notice and the Incentive Plan; and




		
	•
	acknowledges and agrees that this Notice and the Incentive Plan (including any exhibits attached thereto) set forth the entire understanding between the Participant and the Company regarding this Award and supersede all prior oral or written agreements, promises and/or representations on that subject.




	
		
	CHAPARRAL ENERGY, INC.

	By:
	 

	 
	Name:   Charles Duginski

	 
	Title:   Chief Executive Officer




AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
PARTICIPANT
By:         
    Name:
#### MULLEN, Respondent, v. TOWN OF ROCKLAND, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 14, 1896.)

Action by Lawrence Mullen against the town of Rockland.

No opinion. Motion denied. See 39 N. Y. Supp. 1129.
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 99.1(vi)



March 28, 2001



Chase Global Trust - Chase 00-2 (440)
Andrew Cooper
450 W. 33rd St
New York, NY  10001




RE:  Annual Statement as to Compliance


Pursuant to that certain Loan Servicing Agreement ("Agreement") dated as of ,
Chase Funding Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2000-2, I, H. John
Berens, hereby certify that (I) a review of the activities of the Servicer
during the preceding year and the performance under this Agreement has been made
under my supervision, and (II) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement for
such year.


Sincerely,


/s/ H. John Berens
------------------------------------
H. John Berens
Sr. Vice President, Loan Service



HJB/pr
cc: Mr. James L. Shreero
    Ms. Denise Desrosiers, Esq.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 13559 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:11

- cr
- 00215

- RCV

- GRJ

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus SHAWN PETER SPRINGER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ ( March 20, 2015 )
Before MARCUS , WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-13559 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 Page: 1 of 22 Angela Wright, counsel for Shawn Springer, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s a ssessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Springer’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 13-13559 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 Page: 2 of 2
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

LORI WAKEFIELD, individually and on 

behalf of a class of others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

VISALUS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-1857-SI

ORDER GRANTING STAY OF 

EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT AND 

RELIEF FROM BONDING

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

On September 11, 2020, Defendant ViSalus, Inc. moved to stay execution of Plaintiffs’

Judgment in an amount not to exceed $925,220,000, pending appeal and for relief from bonding. 

ECF 392. Under Local Rule 7-1(e)(1), Plaintiffs’ response was due September 25, 2020, but 

Plaintiffs has not responded. The Court concludes that Plaintiffs have waived their response and 

GRANTS Defendant’s motion to stay execution of judgment and for relief from bonding. 

ECF 392.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 29th day of September, 2020.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 403 Filed 09/29/20 Page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Rangeland Resources & Systems Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Areas of Research
                        CARM
                                    PHACE
                                    Thunder Basin
                                    Modeling
                                    WindSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Docsheadline bar Main
               test of page move
               RRSR
               Range
               System
               Wind
               Weather Data and Information
               Near Real Time Data


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1952

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in the formulation

of HIV antiviral drugs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 3, 1998

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used

in the formulation of HIV antiviral drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.33.07 Chloromethyl-2-

propyl carbonate

(CAS No. 35180–

01–9) (provided

for in subheading

2920.90.50) ......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/1999 ’’.
2

•S 1952 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6774

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

HAVIES JUNIOR THOMPSON, a/k/a Man, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:01CR184-

3, a/k/a Manhova, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:01-cr-00184-GCM-3) 

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009 

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Mark Patrick Foster, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF MARK FOSTER, PC, 

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, 

Edward R. Ryan, Acting United States Attorney, Charlotte, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Havies Junior Thompson appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence 

filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no 

reversible error and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. United States v. Thompson, No. 3:01-cr00184-GCM-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ronald A.
Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald A. DurandoRonald A. Durando
Chief Executive Officer

September 12, 2011

---
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0405 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0405

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (Codified version) (COM(2006)0226 - C6-0162/2006 - 2006/0073(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 308 E , 16/12/2006 P. 0086 - 0087 *

P6_TA(2006)0405

Rights related to copyright (Codified version) ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (Codified version) (COM(2006)0226 — C6-0162/2006 — 2006/0073(COD))

(Codecision procedure — Codification)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0226) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 47(2), 55 and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0162/2006),

- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts [2],

- having regard to Rules 80, 51 and 43 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0321/2006),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

--------------------------------------------------
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: USPLS, LC v. Patrick Gaas and Daniel Shank

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 0

- 00604

- CV

Trial court case number: 2019

- 42530

Trial court: 129 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant USPLS, LC has filed a motion for rehearin g. It is ordered that the motion

for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April L. Farris

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of : Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Farris.

Date: December 13, 2022