alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1663

To protect individuals from having their money involuntarily collected and

used for politics by a corporation or labor organization.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 23, 1998

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and considered

FEBRUARY 26, 1998

Referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

A BILL

To protect individuals from having their money involuntarily

collected and used for politics by a corporation or labor

organization.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Paycheck Protection

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. WORKERS’ POLITICAL RIGHTS.

7 Section 316 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

8 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441b) is amended by adding the follow9 ing new subsection:
2

•S 1663 RTS

1 ‘‘(c)(1) Except with the separate, prior, written, vol2 untary authorization of a stockholder, employee, member,

3 or nonmember, it shall be unlawful—

4 ‘‘(A) for any national bank or corporation de5 scribed in this section to collect from or assess such

6 stockholder or employee any dues, initiation fee, or

7 other payment as a condition of employment if any

8 part of such dues, fee, or payment will be used for

9 political activities in which the national bank or cor10 poration, as the case may be, is engaged; and

11 ‘‘(B) for any labor organization described in

12 this section to collect from or assess such member

13 or nonmember any dues, initiation fee, or other pay14 ment if any part of such dues, fee, or payment will

15 be used for political activities.

16 ‘‘(2) An authorization described in paragraph (1)

17 shall remain in effect until revoked and may be revoked

18 at any time.

19 ‘‘(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘politi20 cal activities’ includes communications or other activities

21 which involve carrying on propaganda, attempting to influ22 ence legislation, or participating or intervening in any po23 litical campaign or political party.’’.

Æ
Case 6:14-cv-01606-MA Document 29 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:14-cv-01606-MA Document 29 Filed 11/03/16 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:14-cv-01606-MA Document 29 Filed 11/03/16 Page 3 of 4
Case 6:14-cv-01606-MA Document 29 Filed 11/03/16 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001000235
<NAME> PATRIOT BANK CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                           2,806
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          21,122
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     87,869
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         312,323
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           301,805
<LOANS>                                        639,219
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (5,991)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,133,448
<DEPOSITS>                                     641,822
<SHORT-TERM>                                   145,471
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,283
<LONG-TERM>                                    189,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,133,448
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 41,596
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               21,384
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   293
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                63,273
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              22,056
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,705
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,568
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      825
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,096
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,022
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.28
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,656
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,083
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,017
<RECOVERIES>                                        99
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,991
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,991


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Innovative Fruit Production, Improvement, and Protection: Kearneysville, WV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Upcoming Events
                    Recent Events
                        International Workshop The Fruit Microbiome: A New Frontier
                                    Open House 2019Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Kearneysville, West Virginia Appalachian Fruit Research Laboratory Innovative Fruit Production, Improvement, and Protection People & Locations







Bethanie  Bivens
                        Innovative Fruit Production, Improvement, and Protection

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (304) 725-3451
                         ext. 371
                        
                        Fax: (304) 728-2340(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:       May 13, 2005            By  /s/ Louis Prichard
                                    Louis Prichard
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer

Date:       May 13, 2005            By  /s/ Gregory J. Dawson
                                    Gregory J. Dawson
                                    Chief Financial Officer



24
Lexlibrary/197885.1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 El Reno, Oklahoma
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Troy C Gibbens
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Worker
                        Phone: (405) 262-5291
                        
                        
                        Fax: (405) 262-0133(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50941 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO NEGRETE-ALBA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-833-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sergio Negrete-Alba appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Negrete-Alba contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Negrete-Alba maintains that heNo. 03-50941 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Negrete-Alba acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
HEALTHCARE.COM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,461
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,766
<PP&E>                                           6,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           274
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,243
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,168
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,413
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,089
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,052
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of OmniComm Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

         o        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         o        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Ronald T. Linares
-----------------------
Ronald T. Linares
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Innovative Tech Systems, Inc., on Form S-3 (File No. 33-98100), Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 to Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No.
33-78940) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-09841) of our report dated April 2,
1996, on our audits of the financial statements of Innovative Tech Systems, Inc.
for the year ended January 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual 
Report on Form 10-K.




                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



2400 Eleven Penn Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

April 29, 1998
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00133-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF ERIC JOHNSON,

DECEASED

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Probate Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (2019-PR01490-2)

August 26, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Lee 

Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed. 

It is further ordered that appellant Sesin Johnson shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, I, the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ralph T Finkenbrink                          
|Ralph T. Finkenbrink                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Dated: February 11, 2011
#### Harpal SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76526.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007 *.

Filed April 20, 2007.

*756Inna Lipkin, Esq., Law Offices of Inna Lipkin, Redwood City, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Anthony F. Archeval, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division/Appellate Staff, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Harpal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision that affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Li v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination because Singh’s failure to mention the fact that the police continue to look for him in India until the IJ asked him about it directly during cross examination is a significant omission that goes to the heart of his asylum claim. *See id.*at 964 (so long as one of the identified grounds is supported by substantial evidence and goes to the heart of the claim, we are bound to accept the IJ’s adverse credibility finding).

Because Singh failed to satisfy the lower standard of proof for asylum, it necessarily follows that he failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Singh’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony that the BIA found not credible. Because Singh points to no other evidence that the BIA should have considered in making its CAT determination, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief. *See id.*at 1157.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.