alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               372,197 
<SECURITIES>                                               0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      3,889,696 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (96,909)
<INVENTORY>                                        3,924,151 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   8,303,277 
<PP&E>                                             2,728,851 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (1,390,986)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    16,612,958 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              5,167,839 
<BONDS>                                            4,230,040 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0 
<PREFERRED>                                                0 
<COMMON>                                             121,667 
<OTHER-SE>                                         7,093,412 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      16,612,958 
<SALES>                                           16,029,331 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  16,029,331 
<CGS>                                              9,754,345 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      6,301,657 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       1,282 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      52,839 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   397,565 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (422,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           2,719 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (425,673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0 
<CHANGES>                                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                                        (425,673)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.04)
                                               


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’CONSENT

        We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-42153 on Form S-8 of CenexHarvest States Cooperatives of our report dated June 16, 2003 (whichreport expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in 2002) on theconsolidated financial statements of Ventura Foods, LLC and subsidiary,appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cenex Harvest StatesCooperatives for the year ended August 31, 2002.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Los Angeles, California
EXHIBIT 21.1

                REPAP ENTERPRISES INC. & SUBSIDIARIES


REPAP ENTERPRISES INC. - Incorporated under the laws of Canada
          (formerly Repap Enterprises Corporation Inc. -
          formerly Quinsprack Limited)

ALCELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.  - Continued under the laws of the Province
of New Brunswick
          (formerly Alcell Developments Inc. - formerly 155945
          Canada Inc.)


BLACKVILLE LUMBER INC. - Incorporated under the laws of the Province
of New Brunswick


REPAP MARKETING INC. - Incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware
          (formerly Green Forest Corporation, into which was merged
          the original Repap Ferrostaal (U.S.A.) Inc.)
          (formerly Repap Ferrostaal (U.S.A.)
          (formerly Repap Development Inc.)


REPAP NEW BRUNSWICK INC. - Incorporated under the laws of Canada
          (formerly Miramichi Pulp & Paper Inc.,)
          (formerly Acadia Forest Products Limited)
          (formerly Aidaca Pulp & Paper Limited)


REPAP TECHNOLOGIES INC. - Incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware
          (formerly Biological Energy Corporation)





                                       1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Danielle  Hadaway
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker
                        Phone: (515) 337-7248
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 9, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), OpenJS Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Stream.io, Dallas, TX; and Netflix, San Francisco, CA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and OpenJS Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 17, 2015, OpenJS Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 28, 2015 (80 FR 58297).                          ( print page 47155)    

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 21, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 11, 2021 (86 FR 25885).                

Suzanne Morris, 

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2021-18031 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

CHRISTOPHER GONZALEZAGUILERA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. PETERS, 

Defendants. 

AIKEN, District Judge. 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

1:15-cv-01476-AA 

ORDER 

Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the Oregon Department 

of Corrections, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging 

that the ODOC's rule describing the legal supplies made available 

to indigent inmates - OAR 291-139-0040(5) (a) - is unconstitutional 

on its face, because ODOC does not provide unlimited free postage 

to inmates for "consul ting" with attorneys. In plaintiff's "Reply" 

(#10) he characterizes his claim as one for "First Amendment Free 

Speech (and) Association." Plaintiff seeks declaratory and 

1 - ORDER TO DISMISS - D 

Case 1:15-cv-01476-AA Document 13 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 3
injunctive relief. 

Defendant now move to dismisss (# 9) . 

The ODOC advances all costs to indigent inmates for required 

court or parole board filings. OAR 291-139-0040(5) (a). However it 

does not advance costs for general attorney correspondence under 

that rule. Id. However, indigent inmates are provided five postpaid envelopes per month. OAR 291-131-0015(9). 

In order to state a constitutional claim for denial of access 

to the courts a plaintiff must demonstrate that he has suffered an 

"actual injury." Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996). "Actual 

injury" means "actual prejudice with respect to contemplated or 

existing litigation such as the inability to meet a filing 

deadline or prresent a claim. Id.; see also, Christopher v. 

Harbury 536 U.S. 403, 413-16 (2002). 

In this case plaintiff has failed to allege any actual 

injury. Plaintiff alleges that he is unable to write to attorneys 

to see if they are willing to represent him in a non-specific 

"civil action challenging the conditions of his confinement." Such 

an abstract injury is insufficient to state a constitutional 

claim. See, Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1179 (9th Cir. 1999) 

(rejecting "unlimited free postage" claim). 

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#9) is allowed. The Clerk of 

the Curt is directed to enter a judgment dismissing this action 

Any appeal from this Order or judgment dismissing this action 

2 - ORDER TO DISMISS - D 

Case 1:15-cv-01476-AA Document 13 Filed 11/24/15 Page 2 of 3
would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Therefore, 

plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is hereby revoked. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this day of November, 2015. 

Ann Aiken ~ 

United States District Judge 

3 - ORDER TO DISMISS - D 

Case 1:15-cv-01476-AA Document 13 Filed 11/24/15 Page 3 of 3
#### Thomas Arthur JOHNSON a Minor, by and Through Luwalhati Admana Johnson, His Mother and Legal Guardian, Next Friend, and Attorney *v.*Virginia HARGROVE and Molly Acuff-Willroth, Personally and As School Teachers, and Curtis Spann, Personally and As Principal of Helen Tyson Middle School, Springdale, Arkansas

04-1055

204 S.W.3d 520

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 3, 2005

*Lynn Johnson,*for appellant.

*Charles Harwell,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

On June 22, 2004, the Washington County Circuit Court entered an order in favor of the appellees in this case. On July 14, 2004, Luwalhati Admana Johnson filed a notice of appeal as legal guardian and attorney for her minor son, Thomas Arthur Johnson. On December 1, 2004, Johnson, as legal guardian, attempted to file her appellant’s brief and, at the same time, filed a motion in this court to allow a seven-day correction period to begin on January 20, 2005, if the brief was rejected as nonconforming. Also on December 1, 2004, Johnson and her son departed the United States and traveled to the Philippines. On December 1, 2004, according to the docket sheet, Johnson’s brief indeed was rejected, because the abstract contained “Abstracted pleadings,” there was no testimony in the abstract, and the exhibits were “out of place.” On December 2, 2004, the docket sheet also reflects that “This event was tickled for 12/08/04,” which we interpret to mean that the Supreme Court *110Clerk’s office granted Johnson seven calendar days to file a corrected brief pursuant to Ride 4-4(f)(l) of the Arkansas Supreme Court Rules. On January 6, 2005, this court without comment denied Johnson’s motion for extension of time to correct her brief.

On January 19, 2005, Johnson and her son returned to the United States. Johnson now claims that she did not receive notice of the rejected brief until January 28, 2005. On February 1, 2005, she filed this motion for rule on clerk, admitting that her brief failed to conform to this court’s rules. Johnson excuses her failure to abstract testimony because she contends that “only discussions and/or arguments between counsel and the trial court” occurred at trial. She further claims that she has placed the exhibits in the Addendum. Hargrove does not respond.

We treat this motion for rule on clerk as a motion to file a corrected brief. Under Rule 4-2(b)(3) of our Supreme Court Rules, this court has the authority to grant fifteen days for rebriefing of a nonconforming brief. We grantjohnson fifteen days from the date of this opinion to cure the deficiencies by filing a corrected abstract, Addendum, and brief to conform to Rule 4-2(a)(5) and (8) of those rules. Should she not do so, the order may be affirmed due to noncompliance with our rules. *See*Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (2004).

Motion for corrected brief granted.
# EUR-Lex - 52006SC0621 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006SC0621

**Commission staff working document - Annexes to the Communication from the Commission - Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 - and beyond - Sustaining ecosystem services for human well–being {COM(2006)216 final} - Technical annex /* SEC/2006/0621 */ **

*

*

[pic] | COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels, 22.5.2006

SEC(2006) 621

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

Annexes to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION HALTING THE LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY BY 2010 — AND BEYOND Sustaining ecosystem services for human well–being {COM(2006)216 final} TECHNICAL ANNEX

ANNEX 1 EU ACTION PLAN TO 2010 AND BEYOND

[pic]

[pic][pic]

[pic][pic]

[pic][pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic][pic]

[pic][pic]

[pic]

[pic][pic]

[pic][pic]

ANNEX 2 INDICATORS

[pic]

[pic]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                     |  |                          
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------
|By:                  |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall        
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer  
|                    
|Date: August 7, 2013
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarter Report of B-Teller, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the Quarter Ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Armando Russo,
      President and J. A. Claydon, Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      That
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





B-TELLER,
      INC.


By /s/
      Armando Russo


**President**




By
/s/ J.
      A.
      Claydon


**Secretary**


June
      6,
      2006
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 25, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 47395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18260]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Parts 59, 61, and 62

[Docket ID FEMA-2018-0026]
RIN 1660-AA95


National Flood Insurance Program: Conforming Changes To Reflect 
the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (BW-12) and the 
Homeowners Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (HFIAA), and 
Additional Clarifications for Plain Language; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency; DHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 20, 2020, FEMA published in the Federal Register a 
final rule revising the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) 
regulations to codify certain provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood 
Insurance Reform Act of 2012 and the Homeowner Flood Insurance 
Affordability Act of 2014, and to clarify certain existing NFIP rules 
relating to NFIP operations and the Standard Flood Insurance Policy. 
This final rule provides corrections to those instructions, to be used 
in lieu of the information published July 20.

DATES: This correction is effective October 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this rulemaking is available for inspection 
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov and 
can be viewed by following that website's instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Bronowicz, Director, 
Policyholder Services Division, Federal Insurance and Mitigation 
Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 400 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 557-9488.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2020-09260, beginning on page 
43946 in the Federal Register of Monday, July 20, 2020, the following 
correction is made:

PART 61--INSURANCE COVERAGE AND RATES

Appendix A(2) to Part 61 [Corrected]

0
1. On page 43969, in the second column, in Appendix A(2) to Part 61, 
``Improvements. Fixtures, alterations, installations, or additions 
comprising a part of the dwelling or apartment in which you reside.'' 
is corrected to read ``Improvements. Fixtures, alterations, 
installations, or additions comprising a part of the building.''

Deanne B. Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-18260 Filed 8-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-52-P
(18 Misc. Rep. 563.)

#### REQUARD et al. v. THEISS et al.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

November 30, 1896.)

Costs—Failure to Show Cause por not Securing.

A complaint cannot be dismissed because plaintiff, appearing pursuant to-an order to show cause why he should not file security for costs, fails to satisfy the court that security is unnecessary, as such failure only subjects him to an absolute order to file security.

Appeal from special term.

Action by George Theiss and others against Julius Requard and' others. From an order dismissing the complaint, plaintiffs appeal..

Reversed.

Argued before CONLAN, SCHUCHMAN, and O’DWYER, JJ.

Fromme Bros., for appellants.

Baggott & Ryall, for. respondents.

CONLAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint on failure to file security for costs. The action was commenced on the 27th day of August, 1896, by the service of a summons and complaint, and on the 2d day of September, 1896, an order was made herein in the usual form, requiring the plaintiffs-to file security for costs within 10 days, and, in default of so doing, to show cause in chambers of said court on the 14th day of' September, 1896, why such payment should not be made or undertaking given, and why the said defendants should not receive such, order or further order or relief in the premises as to the court may seem meet. On the return day of the order, the plaintiffs’' attorneys appeared, and urged their reasons for not filing security for costs, which reasons were not deemed sufficient by the court,, and an order was thereupon made dismissing the complaint. This, we think, was error. The plaintiffs were not in default, nor had they in any way disobeyed the direction of the court. The only thing they failed to do was to satisfy the court that they ought not to file security for costs, and this only subjected them to an order-directing them to do so within the time to be fixed in said order;, and, upon proof of their failure to do so, the court, under Code, § 3277, could dismiss the complaint, with costs.

Order appealed from reversed, with costs, but without prejudice to renew at special term. All concur.
P00000126645
P00000126646
P00000126647
P00000126648
P00000126649
P00000126650
P00000126651
P00000126652
P00000126653
P00000126654
P00000126655
P00000126656
P00000126657
P00000126658
P00000126659
P00000126660