alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Brandon  Lanterman
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        WASTEWATER TRTMNT PLANT OPERTR
                        Phone: (785) 712-3115
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Menill Schneider, OSB #77336 

meJTillschneider@sclmeiderlaw.com 

Schneider Kerr & Robichaux 

PO Box 14490 

Portland, Oregon 97293 

Phone: 503-255-9092 

Fax: 503-255-9145 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

WINKYCHIN, 

Plaintiff, 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

3:15-CV-00570-BR 

v. 

ORDER FOR ATTORNEY 

FEES UNDER42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 

NANCY BERRYHILL, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

The court finds and orders an attomey fee of $17,280 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The 

attorney fee of 2,740.03 allowed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act will be refunded to 

Plaintiff upon counsel's receipt of the allowed 406(b) fee awarded. 

Dated this 12\['r.. day of~~--'1¥~------' 2017. 

United States District Court Judge
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Houston, Texas
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Houston, Texas People & Locations







Yong  Xu

                                                                (PhD)
                        Houston, Texas

                        




                        
                        Nutrition Scientist
                        Phone: (713) 798-7199
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Dale, Chief Executive Officer of ATS Medical, Inc. (the Company),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2007


/s/ Michael D. Dale
-------------------------------------
Name: Michael D. Dale
Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           64130
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2964
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      10492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 79046
<PP&E>                                          212747
<DEPRECIATION>                                   82985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  208808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11871
<BONDS>                                             43
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      151219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    208808
<SALES>                                          67878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 67878
<CGS>                                            78784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    78784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14822)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (870)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13952)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)
        


</TABLE>
Case 6:15-cv-00269-TC Document 8 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 6:15-cv-00269-TC Document 8 Filed 03/27/15 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  March 30, 2004                                                 By: /s/ Elwood Shepard

Elwood Shepard

Chief Executive Officer





Chief Financial Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Nicholas  Sayre
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Mechanic
                        Phone: (515) 357-7442
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Martin, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 115]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John P Collins, J.), entered May 3, 2010, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for de novo proceedings on the motion.

Defendant was eligible for consideration for resentencing even though he had been released from custody on his underlying drug conviction but reincarcerated for a parole violation *(see People v Paulin,*17 NY3d 238 [2011]).

The court ruled in the alternative that substantial justice dictated that defendant’s motion be denied. However, defendant was denied his right to be “brought before the court and given an opportunity to be heard” *(People v Soler,*45 AD3d 499 [2007], *lv dismissed*9 NY3d 1009 [2007]). The court issued its order by mail several weeks in advance of defendant’s first scheduled appearance before it. Therefore, defendant had no opportunity to be heard on the issue of whether substantial justice dictated denial of his motion *(see People v Scarborough,*88 AD3d 585, 585 [2011]).

We have considered and rejected the People’s arguments concerning preservation. Concur — Tom, J.R, Friedman, Catterson, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




The
      Board
      of Directors


Zoom
      Technologies, Inc.:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
      33-42834, No. 33-90930, No. 333-60565, No. 333-75575, No. 33-90191, No.
      333-47888, No. 333-97573, No. 333-107923 and No. 333-126612) on Form S-8 of
      Zoom
      Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated March 31, 2006, with respect to the
      consolidated balance sheet of Zoom Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary as of
      December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
      stockholders' equity and comprehensive (loss) income, and cash flows for each
      of
      the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related
      consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December
      31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zoom Technologies, Inc.




/s/
                KPMG LLPBoston,
                Massachusetts
              March
                  30, 2007










**REPORT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**


**ON
      FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE**




The
      Board
      of Directors and Stockholders


Zoom
      Technologies, Inc.:




Under
      date of March 31, 2006, we reported on the consolidated balance sheet of Zoom
      Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and the related
      consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive
      loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December
      31, 2006, which are included in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form
      10-K
      of Zoom Technologies, Inc. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned
      consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated
      financial statement schedule for each of the years in the two-year period ended
      December 31, 2005 also included in the Form 10-K of Zoom Technologies, Inc.
      This
      financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
      Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule
      based on our audits.





In
      our
      opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to
      the
      basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly,
      in
      all material respects, the information set forth therein.




/s/
                KPMG LLPBoston,
                Massachusetts
              March
                  31, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership VI B for
the year ended December 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<CIK>                           0000822784
<NAME>                          REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LTD PARTNERSHIP VI-B
<MULTIPLIER>                    1


<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                             798,022
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                      430,522
<ALLOWANCES>                        29,530
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 1,120,044
<PP&E>                           7,066,795
<DEPRECIATION>                   2,097,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   6,534,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              346,863
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     6,534,717
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,885,431
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    2,276,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 442,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (444,823)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     (444,823)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (5.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0


</TABLE>
#### Floyd G. VILLINES, III, County Judge, et al. *v.*Nora HARRIS

04-568

204 S.W.3d 520

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 3, 2005

[Rehearing denied June 23, 2005.*]

Pulaski County Attorney’s Office, by: *Karla M. Burnett*and *Amanda M. Mitchell,*for appellants.

*Dover, Dixon & Horne PLLC,*by: *Thomas S. Stone*and *Nona M. Morris,*for appellee.

*

 Special Justices Edward MORGAN, HANI HASHEM, and ELDON COFFMAN join. Corbin, Brown, and Imber, JJ., not participating.

Per Curiam.

Floyd Villines, III, appeals from “all orders entered in this case” involving alleged improper assessment of real property taxes in Pulaski County. However, in violation of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4~2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the Addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the Addendum is deficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended Addendum. It is a practical impossibility for seven justices to examine a single transcript filed with this court. *City of Dover v. City of Russellville,*351 Ark. 557, 95 S.W.3d 808 (2003). Further, this court may affirm the judgment under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. 4-2(b) (3) if an amended Addendum is not filed within the fifteen days.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Ralph T. Finkenbrink certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nicholas Financial, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: August 12, 2005              /s/Ralph T Finkenbrink   Ralph T. Finkenbrink   Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer     (Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DEON IV A BUCHER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYNW. COLVIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

PAP AK, Magistrate Judge: 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

Civil No. 3:15-cv-00823-PK 

JUDGMENT 

Based on the record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the 

Commissioner is affirmed and this case is dismi d. 

Dated this rJi--'day of June, 2016. 

Pau!Papak 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-00823-PK Document 18 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 1