[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 153 (Thursday, August 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44455-44458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17177]



[[Page 44455]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-92600; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2021-057]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend NOM's Options Regulatory Fee

August 6, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on August 5, 2021, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I and II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. 
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend The Nasdaq Options Market LLC's 
(``NOM'') Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 5 related to the 
Options Regulatory Fee or ``ORF''.
    While the changes proposed herein are effective upon filing, the 
Exchange has designated the amendments become operative on October 1, 
2021.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at 
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Currently, NOM assesses an ORF of $0.0020 per contract side as 
specified in NOM's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 5. The 
Exchange proposes to waive its ORF from October 1, 2021 to January 31, 
2022, and then recommence the ORF on February 1, 2022.
    By way of background, the options industry has experienced 
extremely high options trading volumes and volatility. This historical 
anomaly of persistent increased options volumes has impacted NOM's ORF 
collection which, in turn, has caused the Exchange to continue to 
revisit its financial forecast to reflect the sustained elevated 
options volumes and volatility. As the Exchange continues to monitor 
the amount of revenue collected from the ORF to ensure that our ORF 
collection, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, does 
not exceed regulatory costs, the Exchange has found it difficult to 
determine when volumes will return to more normal levels. In order to 
avoid iterative rule changes to amend its ORF, the Exchange believes it 
is prudent to instead waive its ORF from October 1, 2021 to January 31, 
2022, to permit the Exchange to plan future forecasts without the need 
to account for any ORF collection during that timeframe. This proposal 
would ensure that revenue collected from the ORF, in combination with 
other regulatory fees and fines, would not exceed the Exchange's total 
regulatory costs. NOM would recommence assessing its current ORF rate 
of $0.0020 per contract side as of February 1, 2022. Furthermore, prior 
to February 1, 2022, NOM will examine its ORF rate to determine if the 
$0.0020 per contract side ORF is justified given the current volumes in 
2022 as well as the current Exchange regulatory expenses at that time. 
NOM would file a proposed rule change to amend its per contract ORF if 
changes are necessary to ensure an equitable allocation of reasonable 
ORF, if e.g., the Exchange believes that the volumes NOM experiences in 
the second half of 2021 are likely to persist throughout 2022. Of note, 
NOM proposes to continue to operate with the ORF fee waived in January 
2022 to allow its Participants \3\ and other broker dealers time to 
align their systems for February 1, 2022, allowing for time after the 
holiday period which traditionally have year-end code freezes in place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``Options Participant'' or ``Participant'' mean a 
firm, or organization that is registered with the Exchange pursuant 
to Options 2A of these Rules for purposes of participating in 
options trading on NOM as a ``Nasdaq Options Order Entry Firm'' or 
``Nasdaq Options Market Maker''. See Options 1, Section 1(a)(39). 
All NOM Participants must be an existing member or become a member 
of the Exchange, pursuant to the 1000 rules series, and continue to 
abide by the requirements of the 1000 Series with respect to 
participation in NOM. See Options 2A, Section 1(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Collection of ORF
    Currently, NOM assesses its ORF for each customer option 
transaction that is either: (1) Executed by a Participant on NOM; or 
(2) cleared by a NOM Participant at The Options Clearing Corporation 
(``OCC'') in the customer range,\4\ even if the transaction was 
executed by a non-Participant of NOM, regardless of the exchange on 
which the transaction occurs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Participants must record the appropriate account origin code 
on all orders at the time of entry of the order. The Exchange 
represents that it has surveillances in place to verify that 
Participants mark orders with the correct account origin code.
    \5\ The Exchange uses reports from OCC when assessing and 
collecting the ORF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF
    The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the ORF 
to ensure that it, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, 
does not exceed regulatory costs. In determining whether an expense is 
considered a regulatory cost, the Exchange reviews all costs and makes 
determinations if there is a nexus between the expense and a regulatory 
function. The Exchange notes that fines collected by the Exchange in 
connection with a disciplinary matter offset ORF.
    Revenue generated from ORF, when combined with all of the 
Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines, is designed to recover a 
material portion of the regulatory costs to the Exchange of the 
supervision and regulation of Participant customer options business 
including performing routine surveillances, investigations, 
examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, 
interpretive, and enforcement activities. Regulatory costs include 
direct regulatory expenses and certain indirect expenses in support of 
the regulatory function. The direct expenses include in-house and 
third-party service provider costs to support the day-to-day regulatory 
work such as surveillances, investigations and examinations. The 
indirect expenses include support from such areas as Office of the 
General Counsel, technology, and internal audit. Indirect expenses are 
estimated to be approximately 42% of the total regulatory costs for 
2021. Thus, direct

[[Page 44456]]

expenses are estimated to be approximately 58% of total regulatory 
costs for 2021.
    The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to 
the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of its members, 
including performing routine surveillances, investigations, 
examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, 
interpretive, and enforcement activities.
Proposal
    Based on the Exchange's most recent review, the Exchange proposes 
to waive ORF from October 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022, to help ensure 
that revenue collected from the ORF, in combination with other 
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total 
regulatory costs. NOM would recommence assessing its current ORF rate 
of $0.0020 per contract side as of February 1, 2022. The Exchange 
issued an Options Trader Alert on July 2, 2021 indicating the proposed 
rate change for October 1, 2021.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Options Trader Alert 2021-41.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed waiver is based on recent options volume which has 
remained at abnormally and unexpectedly high levels. Options volume in 
2021 remains significantly high when that volume is compared to 2019 
and 2020 options volume. For example, total options contract volume in 
November 2020 was 71% higher than the total options contract volume in 
November 2019.\7\ Below is industry data from OCC \8\ which illustrates 
the significant increase in volume during the fourth quarter of 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See data from OCC at: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201202005584/en/OCC-November-2020-Total-Volume-Up-71-Percent-From-a-Year-Ago.
    \8\ See data from OCC at: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Volume-by-Account-Type.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Volume                    October 2020      November 2020      December 2020         Q4 2020
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total...............................        633,365,184        673,660,858        753,568,354      2,060,594,396
Customer............................        587,707,301        630,297,252        708,037,956      1,926,042,509
Total ADV...........................      28,789,326.55      33,683,042.90      34,253,107.00      32,196,787.44
Customer ADV........................      26,713,968.23      31,514,862.60      32,183,543.45      30,094,414.20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Below is industry data from OCC \9\ which illustrates the 
significant increase in volume from January 2021 through March 2021. 
The options volume in the first quarter of 2021 was higher than the 
fourth quarter of 2020. Also, April and May 2021 volumes remain 
significantly high as compared to 2020 options volume in general.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Volume                              January 2021      February 2021        March 2021         April 2021          May 2021
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................................        838,339,790        823,412,827        898,653,388        711,388,828        718,368,993
Customer.................................................        784,399,878        782,113,450        837,247,059        667,208,963        659,913,862
Total ADV................................................      44,123,146.84      43,337,517.20      39,071,886.40      33,875,658.50      35,918,449.70
Customer ADV.............................................      41,284,204.11      41,163,865.79      36,402,046.04      31,771,855.38      32,995,693.10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result of the historical anomaly created by these high options 
volumes, NOM has no assurance that the Exchange's final costs for 2021 
will not differ materially from these expectations and prior practice, 
nor can the Exchange predict with certainty whether options volume will 
remain at the current level going forward. The Exchange notes however, 
that when combined with regulatory fees and fines, the revenue being 
generated utilizing the current ORF rate may result in revenue in 
excess of the Exchange's estimated regulatory costs for the year. 
Particularly, as noted above, the options market has seen a substantial 
increase in volume in 2021 as compared to 2020, due in large part to 
the continued extreme volatility in the marketplace as a result of the 
COVID-19 pandemic. This unprecedented spike in volatility resulted in 
significantly higher volume than was originally projected by the 
Exchange (thereby resulting in substantially higher ORF revenue than 
projected). The Exchange therefore proposes to waive ORF from October 
1, 2021 to January 31, 2022 to ensure it does not exceed its regulatory 
costs for 2021. Particularly, the Exchange believes that waiving ORF 
from October 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022 and considering all of the 
Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines would allow the Exchange to 
continue covering a material portion of its regulatory costs, while 
lessening the potential for generating excess revenue that may 
otherwise occur using the current rate.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Exchange notes that its regulatory responsibilities 
with respect to Participant compliance with options sales practice 
rules have largely been allocated to FINRA under a 17d-2 agreement. 
The ORF is not designed to cover the cost of that options sales 
practice regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NOM would recommence assessing its current ORF rate of $0.0020 per 
contract side as of February 1, 2022. Until October 1, 2021, the 
Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue collected from 
the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other regulatory 
fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. The Exchange would 
also continue monitoring the amount of revenue collected from the ORF 
when it recommences assessing ORF on February 1, 2022. If the Exchange 
determines regulatory revenues exceed regulatory costs, the Exchange 
will adjust the ORF by submitting a fee change filing to the Commission 
and notifying \11\ its Participants via an Options Trader Alert.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange will provide Participants with such notice at 
least 30 calendar days prior to the effective date of the change.
    \12\ The Exchange notes that in connection with this proposal, 
it provided the Commission confidential details regarding the 
Exchange's projected regulatory revenue, including projected revenue 
from ORF, along with a projected regulatory expenses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, 
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act. \13\ Specifically, the 
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 
6(b)(4) of the Act, \14\ which provides that Exchange rules may provide 
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,

[[Page 44457]]

fees, and other charges among its members, and other persons using its 
facilities. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \15\ requirement that the 
rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination 
between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed fee waiver is reasonable because 
customer transactions will be subject to no ORF from October 1, 2021 to 
January 31, 2022. Moreover, the proposed waiver is necessary, so the 
Exchange does not collect revenue in excess of its anticipated 
regulatory costs, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, 
which is consistent with the Exchange's practices.
    The Exchange designed the ORF to generate revenues that would be 
less than the amount of the Exchange's regulatory costs to ensure that 
it, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not 
exceed regulatory costs, which is consistent with the view of the 
Commission that regulatory fees be used for regulatory purposes and not 
to support the Exchange's business operations. As discussed above, 
however, after review of its regulatory costs and regulatory revenues, 
which includes revenues from ORF and other regulatory fees and fines, 
the Exchange determined that absent a reduction in ORF, it may be 
collecting revenue in excess of its regulatory costs. Indeed, the 
Exchange notes that when considering the recent options volume, which 
included an increase in customer options transactions, it estimates the 
ORF may generate revenues that may cover more than the approximated 
Exchange's projected regulatory costs. As such, the Exchange believes 
it's reasonable and appropriate to waive ORF from October 1, 2021 to 
January 31, 2022 and recommence assessing ORF on February 1, 2022.
    The Exchange also believes the proposed fee change is equitable and 
not unfairly discriminatory as no Participant would be assessed an ORF 
from October 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022. While the Exchange has 
assessed and collected ORF from January through September, 2021, but 
will not collect ORF, with this proposal, from October 2021 through 
January 2022, the Exchange does not believe that it is unfairly 
discriminatory to not assess the ORF from October 2021 through January 
2022 because the ORF is designed and intended to recover a portion of 
the Exchange's regulatory costs without collecting in excess of those 
costs. Unexpectedly high and sustained customer volume has resulted in 
higher revenues from the ORF that, if not suspended, will likely result 
in over-collection of ORF, which would be inconsistent with the 
Exchange's prior representations and undertaking to not collect ORF in 
excess of regulatory expenses. The Exchange did not decrease the amount 
of the ORF earlier in 2021 because it did not expect, based on its 
prior experience, that customer volume would remain abnormally high. 
Also, it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to recommence the 
assessment of the ORF on February 1, 2022 because assessing the ORF to 
each Participant for options transactions cleared by OCC in the 
customer range where the execution occurs on another exchange and is 
cleared by aa NOM Participant is an equitable allocation of reasonable 
dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other 
persons using its facilities.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ If the OCC clearing member is a NOM Participant, ORF is 
assessed and collected on all cleared customer contracts (after 
adjustment for CMTA); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is not a 
NOM Participant, ORF is collected only on the cleared customer 
contracts executed at NOM, taking into account any CMTA instructions 
which may result in collecting the ORF from a non-member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes recommencing the ORF on February 1, 2022 at 
the same rate, unless options volumes at that time warrant a proposed 
rule change, continues to ensure fairness by assessing higher fees to 
those Participants that require more Exchange regulatory services based 
on the amount of customer options business they conduct. As noted in 
prior ORF rule changes which set the current ORF rate of $0.0020 per 
contract side, regulating customer trading activity is much more labor 
intensive and requires greater expenditure of human and technical 
resources than regulating non-customer trading activity, which tends to 
be more automated and less labor-intensive. For example, there are 
costs associated with main office and branch office examinations (e.g., 
staff expenses), as well as investigations into customer complaints and 
the terminations of registered persons.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81344 (August 8, 
2017), 82 FR 37955 (August 14, 2017) (SR-NASDAQ-2017-068) (Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Revise 
the NASDAQ Options Market LLC Rules Regarding the Options Regulatory 
Fee). The Exchange also noted in this rule change that, ``As a 
result, the costs associated with administering the customer 
component of the Exchange's overall regulatory program are 
materially higher than the costs associated with administering the 
Customer component of the Exchange's overall regulatory program are 
materially higher than the costs associated with administering the 
non-Customer component (e.g. Participant proprietary transactions) 
of its regulatory program.'' See 82 FR 37956. Further, the Exchange 
notes that it has broad regulatory responsibilities with respect to 
activities of its Participants, irrespective of where their 
transactions take place. Many of the Exchange's surveillance 
programs for customer trading activity may require the Exchange to 
look at activity across all markets, such as reviews related to 
position limit violations and manipulation. Indeed, the Exchange 
cannot effectively review for such conduct without looking at and 
evaluating activity regardless of where it transpires. In addition 
to its own surveillance programs, the Exchange also works with other 
SROs and exchanges on intermarket surveillance related issues. 
Through its participation in the Intermarket Surveillance Group 
(``ISG'') the Exchange shares information and coordinates inquiries 
and investigations with other exchanges designed to address 
potential intermarket manipulation and trading abuses. Accordingly, 
there is a strong nexus between the ORF and the Exchange's 
regulatory activities with respect to customer trading activity of 
its Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe 
that this proposal creates an unnecessary or inappropriate intra-market 
or inter-market burden on competition for several reasons. First, ORF 
has been amended several times since its inception in 2011.\18\ For 
example, NOM amended its ORF rate from $0.0021 to $0.0027 per contract 
side as of August 1, 2017. Participants who either executed a 
transaction on NOM or cleared a transaction at OCC in the customer 
range would have been assessed a higher ORF for a transaction executed 
on NOM on August 1, 2017 ($0.0027 per contract side) as compared to 
July 31, 2017 ($0.0021 per contract side). There have been ORF 
amendments which have caused NOM to assess different ORF rates to 
Participants for different time periods causing Participants to have 
paid different ORFs since 2011. For example, if NOM received payment of 
a fine from a disciplinary action, that fine would offset regulatory 
costs and would cause NOM to require less regulatory revenue for a 
particular period. The changing regulatory costs would impact the ORF 
assessed by NOM to Participants. In the past, the Exchange has amended 
ORF to be higher or lower,\19\ thereby impacting the amount paid by 
Participants in a calendar year. Third, options markets assess ORF at 
different rates. For

[[Page 44458]]

instance, today, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'') assesses a lower ORF of 
$0.0004 per contract side.\20\ MRX has assessed this rate since 
February 1, 2019.\21\ Depending on where a customer order is executed, 
a Participant could be assessed a much different ORF. For example, in 
the case where a customer order is sent to NOM and routed to MRX, and a 
non-Participant cleared that transaction, the NOM ORF of $0.0020 would 
not be assessed to the Participant who executed the transaction or 
cleared the transaction, rather the MRX rate of $0.0004 per contract 
side would be assessed. In that same scenario presuming a non-
Participant cleared the transaction, if the customer order could have 
executed on NOM instead of routing away the Participant would have been 
assessed the NOM ORF of $0.0020 per contract side. The customer, in 
that instance, would have no knowledge of where the order could be 
executed, as the liquidity profile of each exchange may differ at that 
exact moment. Therefore, Participants could be assessed a different ORF 
on the same day on the same transaction based on routing decisions, and 
in those cases the Participant would continue to benefit from the 
regulatory program available on each market and discover where the 
liquidity is available, irrespective of any ORF rate differentials 
across markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 81344 (August 8, 
2017), 82 FR 37955 (August 14, 2017) (SR-NASDAQ-2017-068); 78360 
(July 19, 2016), 81 FR 48475 (July 25, 2016) (SR-NASDAQ-2016-096); 
and 76950 (January 21, 2016), 81 FR 4687 (January 27, 2016) (SR-
NASDAQ-2016-003).
    \19\ Id.
    \20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 85127 (February 
13, 2019), 84 FR 5173 (February 20, 2019) (SR-MRX-2019-03).
    \21\ Of note, prior to February 1, 2019, MRX assessed no ORF 
thereby creating a calendar year where Participants were assessed no 
ORF for a period similar to what is proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes recommencing the ORF on February 1, 2022 at 
the same rate, unless options volumes or the Exchange's regulatory 
expenses at that time warrant a proposed rule change, does not create 
an undue burden on competition because the ORF applies to all customer 
activity, thereby raising regulatory revenue to offset regulatory 
expenses. It also supplements the regulatory revenue derived from non-
customer activity. Recommencing the assessment of the current ORF does 
not create an unnecessary or inappropriate inter-market burden on 
competition because it is a regulatory fee that supports regulation in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange is obligated to 
ensure that the amount of regulatory revenue collected from the ORF, in 
combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed 
regulatory costs.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \22\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 
19b-4 \23\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other 
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \24\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbb9bea7aee6a8a4a6a6aea5bfb88bb8aea8e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7b5b2aba2eaa4a8aaaaa2a9b3b487b4a2a4e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include 
File No. SR-NASDAQ-2021-057 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASDAQ-2021-057. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File No. SR-NASDAQ-2021-057, and should be submitted on 
or before September 2, 2021.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17177 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>