alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the lim ited circumstances set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________ No. 97-60486

____________
LUCIAN MARINESCU, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A 71 980 313 June 24, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lucian Calin Marinescu petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Ap peals’ decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and for a withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review is DENIED.
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1903

To prohibit the return of veterans memorial objects to foreign nations without

specific authorization in law.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 1, 1998

Mr. THOMAS (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

HAGEL, and Mr. SMITH of Oregon) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To prohibit the return of veterans memorial objects to

foreign nations without specific authorization in law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON RETURN OF VETERANS ME4 MORIAL OBJECTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC AU5 THORIZATION IN LAW.

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, the President may not transfer a veterans me8 morial object to a foreign country or entity controlled by

9 a foreign government, or otherwise transfer or convey such

10 object to a person or entity for purposes of the ultimate
2

•S 1903 IS

1 transfer or conveyance of such object to a foreign country

2 or entity controlled by a foreign government, unless spe3 cifically authorized by law.

4 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

5 (1) ENTITY CONTROLLED BY A FOREIGN GOV6 ERNMENT.—The term ‘‘entity controlled by a for7 eign government’’ has the meaning given that term

8 in section 2536(c)(1) of title 10, United States

9 Code.

10 (2) VETERANS MEMORIAL OBJECT.—The term

11 ‘‘veterans memorial object’’ means any object, in12 cluding a physical structure or portion thereof,

13 that—

14 (A) is located at a cemetery of the Na15 tional Cemetery System, war memorial, or mili16 tary installation in the United States;

17 (B) is dedicated to, or otherwise memorial18 izes, the death in combat or combat-related du19 ties of members of the United States Armed

20 Forces; and

21 (C) was brought to the United States from

22 abroad as a memorial of combat abroad.

Æ
734 A.2d 1275

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Robert Laverne RICKABAUGH, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 9, 1999.

Decided Sept. 8, 1999.

Jackie Atheron Bernard, Duncansville, for Com.

Andrea F. McKenna, Harrisburg, for Com.-Intervenor.

John F. Siford, Pittsburgh, for Robert L. Rickabaugh.

Karl Baker, Philadelphia, Gary Neil Asteak, Easton, Stefan Presser, Philadelphia, for Amicus Curiae.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Blair County Court of Common Pleas dated February 13, 1998. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
EXHIBIT 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Oak Hill  Financial,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron
J.  Copher,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Ron J. Copher

Ron J. Copher
Chief Financial Officer

May 26, 2006

                                      -25-
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Whitney  Toyne
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker
                        Phone: (515) 337-7692
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32(a)



18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification



I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that
the accompanying Form 10-K of Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) for the period ended December 31, 2017, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that
the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Bancorp.



|By: | /s/ Daniel J. Schrider  | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|    | Daniel J. Schrider      | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | Date: March 13, 2018    |
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-95,562-01

EX PARTE JASON SHANE MOSES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 19274-A IN THE 115TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM UPSHUR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of evading arrest with a vehicle and sentenced to twenty-five years’

imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends that was denied his right to an appeal because timelynotice of appeal was

not filed. Applicant wrote a letter requesting an appeal within the time frame to file a timely notice

of appeal, but that letter was not received by the trial court until well after the time had passed to file

such notice. Counsel was not ineffective, nor did the trial court err, but due to a delay in the mail

system, Applicant’s letter was not timely received.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant may
2

file an out-of-time appeal of conviction in cause number 19,274 from the 115th District Court of

Upshur County. Within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall

determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by

counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him on direct appeal. Should Applicant

decide to appeal, must file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within thirty days from the date

of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the TexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. 

Delivered: June 19, 2024

Do not publish
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative Officer of Enstar
Income/Growth Program Six-A, L.P. (the Partnership) in compliance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership. /s/ Steven A. SchummSteven A. SchummChief Administrative OfficerApril 14, 2004
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1548

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on N-(2,3-Dihydro-2-oxo1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-5-methyl-4-[(methylamino)sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]

naphthalene-2-carboxaminde.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on

N-(2,3-Dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-5-methyl-4-

[(methylamino)sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-

carboxaminde.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1548 IS

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON N-(2,3-DIHYDRO-2-

2 OXO-1H-BENZIMIDAZOL-5-YL)-5-METHYL-4-

3 [(METHYLAMINO)SULPHONYL]PHENYL]AZO]

4 NAPHTHALENE-2-CARBOXAMINDE.

5 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 in numerical sequence the following subheading:

‘‘ 9902.32.XX N-(2,3-Dihydro-2-

oxo-1Hbenzimidazol-5-yl)-

5-methyl-4-[(methyl amino)

sulphonyl]

phenyl]azo] naphthalene-2-

carboxaminde provided for in subheading

3204.17.04 ........... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re10 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

11 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

12 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                      33,635,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              207,689,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                11,985,000
<INVENTORY>                                210,895,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           500,656,701
<PP&E>                                     477,031,065
<DEPRECIATION>                             222,555,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             945,703,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      398,202,123
<BONDS>                                    177,610,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 414,003,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               945,703,463
<SALES>                                  5,507,394,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         5,607,449,565
<CGS>                                    5,464,036,841
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            62,311,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,041,498
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,442,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             63,658,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,400,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         57,258,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                57,258,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 163 (Thursday, August 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 47644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18428]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meetings

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.

ACTION: Notice of five AHRQ subcommittee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The subcommittees listed below are part of AHRQ's Health 
Services Research Initial Review Group Committee. Grant applications 
are to be reviewed and discussed at these meetings. Each subcommittee 
meeting will be closed to the public.

DATES: See below for dates of meetings:

1. Healthcare Effectiveness and Outcomes Research (HEOR)
    Date: October 13-14, 2021
2. Healthcare Safety and Quality Improvement Research (HSQR)
    Date: October 13-14, 2021
3. Health Care Research and Training (HCRT)
    Date: October 14-15, 2021
4. Health System and Value Research (HSVR)
    Date: October 14-15, 2021
5. Healthcare Information Technology Research (HITR)
    Date: October 21-22, 2021

ADDRESSES: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Virtual Review), 
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (To obtain a roster of members, agenda 
or minutes of the non-confidential portions of the meetings.)
    Jenny Griffith, Committee Management Officer, Office of Extramural 
Research Education and Priority Populations, Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 
20857, Telephone (301) 427-1557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2), AHRQ announces 
meetings of the above-listed scientific peer review groups, which are 
subcommittees of AHRQ's Health Services Research Initial Review Group 
Committee. The subcommittee meetings will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 section 
10(d), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Agenda items for these meetings are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

    Dated: August 18, 2021.
Marquita Cullom,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2021-18428 Filed 8-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated February 6, 2004 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Apogee Technology, Inc.
and Subsidiary on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003. We consent
to the use of the aforementioned report, which is incorporated by reference in
the Registration Statements of Apogee Technology, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-106316, 333-90558 and 333-61486).


/s/ YOHALEM GILLMAN & COMPANY LLP



New York, New York
March 25, 2004
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1

SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

CALCULATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
CHARGES


Three Months Ended March 31,
2003


(Dollars in thousands)


|                                   |                                                                 |   |       |        | 
|---------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ----- | ------ | 
|Net income                         |                                                                 | $ | 8,970 |       
|Interest:                          |                                                                 |   |       |       
|                                   | Expense incurred                                                |   |       | 10,351 | 
|                                   | Amortization of deferred financing costs                        |   |       | 382    | 
|                                   | Rental fixed charges                                            |   |       | 69     | 
|                                   |                                                                 |   |       |       
|                                   | Total                                                           |   | $     | 19,772 | 
|                                   |                                                                 |   |       |       
|Fixed charges:                     |                                                                 |   |       |       
|                                   | Interest expense                                                |   | $     | 10,351 | 
|                                   | Interest capitalized                                            |   |       | 2,604  | 
|                                   | Dividends to preferred unitholders in operating
    partnership |   |       | 3,105  | 
|                                   | Rental fixed charges                                            |   |       | 69     | 
|                                   | Amortization of deferred financing costs                        |   |       | 382    | 
|                                   |                                                                 |   |       |       
|                                   | Total                                                           |   | $     | 16,511 | 
|                                   |                                                                 |   |       |       
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |                                                                 |   | 1.20  |       
|                                   |                                                                 |   |       |
EXHIBIT 99.2


		THE PRUDENTIAL HOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.
		    OFFICER'S ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE


The undersigned Vice Presidents of The Prudential Home Mortgage
Company, Inc., servicer (the "Servicer") under servicing 
agreements related to the Series Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates of the Series listed on Attachment A hereto 
(the "Agreements"), hereby certify that:


		(i) a review of the activities of the
		Servicer for calendar year 1996 and of 
		its performance under the Agreements for
		such period has been made under the
		undersigned's supervision, and

		(ii) to the best of the undersigned's
		knowledge, based on such review, the
		Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
		under the Agreements throughout such period.


Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given
to them in the Agreement.


Date:  March 31,1997


By:     /s/CAROLYN PUMPHREY
Name:   Carolyn Pumphrey
Title:  Vice President


By:     /s/DANIEL ROSEN
Name:   Daniel Rosen
Title:  Vice President


		ATTACHMENT A

		1996-1
		1996-2
		1996-3
		1996-4
		1996-5
		1996-6
#### In the Matter of Joan Lo Pinto, Respondent, v Benjamin Ward et al., Appellants.

At the time of her appointment to the New York City Police Department on August 31, 1973, petitioner did not display any symptoms of heart disease. Nor was there any family history of such disease. No evidence of heart disease was detected in a subsequent physical examination undertaken in 1978, upon her return to active duty after a three-year fiscally imposed layoff. After reporting sick, however, on May 2, 1983, approximately five years later, an echocardiogram was performed which indicated a mitral valve prolapse. Petitioner was thereafter placed on restricted duty after an increase in the episodes of dizziness from which she was suffering. She was subsequently examined by the Pension Fund’s Medical Board, which confirmed the existence of mitral valve prolapse, and found petitioner disabled but recommended ordinary disability. Petitioner was retired on ordinary disability when the Board of Trustees voted 6 to 6 on her accident disability application. She thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Special Term, finding that "[respondents have failed affirmatively to rebut the presumption of job-relatedness found in the Heart Bill Law”, remanded the matter to the Medical Board for reconsideration. We reverse.

In confirming the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse, the Medical Board found that petitioner’s condition was unrelated to stress incurred in the performance of her police duties. The board’s conclusion was based, as it noted, on the "well established medical fact that neither physical [n]or emotional stress is a contributing factor in such condition.” While General Municipal Law § 207-k (Heart Bill) "creates a presumption that a disabling or fatal heart condition suffered by a New York City police officer * * * was accidentally sustained as a result of his employment if not rebutted by contrary proof’ *(Uniformed Firefighters Assn. v Beekman,*52 NY2d 463, 472-473), the Medical Board’s opinion constitutes competent evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption. *(See, Matter of Goldman v McGuire,*101 AD2d 768, *affd*64 NY2d 1041; *Matter of Simmons v Herkommer,*98 AD2d 651, *affd*62 NY2d *498711; *Matter of Gumbrecht v McGuire,*117 AD2d 531.) In instances where, as here, the Medical Board has eliminated the possibility that the mitral valve prolapse was stress or job related, the Heart Bill presumption is rebutted.

The petition is dismissed. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Carro and Asch, JJ.