alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Fort Pierce, Florida
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida People & Locations







Stephen R Mayo
                        Fort Pierce, Florida

                        




                        
                        Supervisory Agricultural Science Research Technician
                        Phone: (772) 462-5883
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)
                            **Publications**
                                                (Clicking on the reprint icon
                                                    Reprint Icon
                                                    will take you to the publication reprint.)Planting in metallized reflective mulch did not significantly benefit development of new hybrid seedlings
                                                        

- (Peer Reviewed Journal)Stover, E.W., Mayo, S., Driggers, R.E., Adair, R.C. 2022. Planting in metallized reflective mulch did not significantly benefit development of new hybrid seedlings. HortScience. 57:2. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI16248-21.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1855

To require the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to recognize

that electronic forms of providing MSDS’s provide the same level of

access to information as paper copies.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24, 1998

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and

Human Resources

A BILL

To require the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to recognize that electronic forms of providing

MSDS’s provide the same level of access to information

as paper copies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workplace Information

5 Readability and Electronic Dissemination Act’’.
2

•S 1855 IS

1 SEC. 2. OSHA RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC MSDS’S.

2 Section 6(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health

3 Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655(b)) is amended by adding at

4 the end the following:

5 ‘‘(9) Not later than 90 days after the date of

6 enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary shall

7 promulgate a rule to clarify that an employer com8 plies with the standard contained in section

9 1910.1200(g) of title 29, Code of Federal Regula10 tions, that requires the employer to maintain infor11 mation on each hazardous chemical used in the

12 workplace if the information is readily accessible

13 (available for retrieval within 24 hours, or imme14 diately in the case of an emergency) to employees

15 through electronic access or other alternatives to

16 paper copies.’’.

17 SEC. 3. STANDARDIZED FORMAT FOR MSDS’S.

18 Section 6(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health

19 Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655(b)) (as amended by section

20 2), is further amended by adding at the end the following:

21 ‘‘(10)(A) Not later than 90 days after the date

22 of enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary shall

23 modify the regulations contained in section

24 1910.1200 of title 29, Code of Federal Regulations,

25 to require a standard format for presenting informa26 tion on hazardous chemicals as required under such
3

•S 1855 IS

1 section. Such format shall provide that the required

2 information be provided in a uniform and consistent

3 manner.

4 ‘‘(B) The standard format under subparagraph

5 (A) shall require information on all new hazardous

6 chemicals produced, imported, or used to be pre7 sented at a literacy proficiency level that is substan8 tially equivalent to Literacy Level 2 as defined by

9 the Department of Education in the National Center

10 for Education Statistics, 1992 Adult Literacy Sur11 vey.

12 ‘‘(C) The modifications required under this

13 paragraph shall become effective not later than 3

14 years after the date of enactment of this para15 graph.’’.

Æ
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 22, 2020

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 20

- 00 281

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.E.H.

On Appeal from the 345th District Court

Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D

- 1

- AG

- 15

- 002375

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a protective order signed January 29, 2020 . The notice of appeal was filed February 26 , 2020

. N o clerk’s record has been filed. On July 30, 2020, we issued an order directin g appellant, C.H., to provide proof within 30 days that she had either arranged to pay for the clerk’s record or complied with the requirements of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 in the trial court. We cautioned that if she did not provide such proof, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. No such proof has been provided. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3( b ).

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant

.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Projects
                        NP 301Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research People & Locations







Robyndee B Laumbach
                        Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (806) 749-5560
                        
                        
                        Fax: (806) 723-5272(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Katherine D. Crothall, President and Chief Executive Officer of Animas Corporation, certifythat:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Animas Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of Animas Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. Animas Corporation’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Animas Corporation and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Animas Corporation, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of Animas Corporation’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in Animas Corporation’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during Animas Corporation’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, Animas Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. Animas Corporation’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Animas Corporation’s auditors and theaudit committee of Animas Corporation’s board of directors:
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likelyto adversely affect Animas Corporation’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Animas Corporation’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 16, 2005      By:               */s/ Katherine D. Crothall*    *   Katherine D. Crothall   President and Chief Executive Officer
 *
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul Katzeff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2006
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ Paul Katzeff                     
|                   |  | Paul Katzeff, Chief Executive Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Water Management and Systems Research: Fort Collins, CO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Publications
                    NewsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fort Collins, Colorado Center for Agricultural Resources Research Water Management and Systems Research People & Locations







Ross  Steward
                        Water Management and Systems Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (970) 492-7770
                        
                        
                        Fax: (970) 492-7408(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Spears, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 500]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), rendered December 3, 2009, as amended January 19, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender whose prior felony conviction was a violent felony, to an aggregate term of 18 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before ordering closure of the courtroom during an undercover officer’s testimony, the court implicitly considered but rejected an alternative to closure proposed by defendant, and the court’s ruling was reasonable under the circumstances *(see e.g. People v Sweeney,*25 AD3d 335, 336 [2006]). Accordingly, the court satisfied the requirement of considering alternatives to full closure *(see Presley v Georgia,*558 US —, —, 130 S Ct 721, 724 [2010]; *People Mickens,*82 AD3d 430 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 798 [2011], *cert denied*565 US —, 132 S Ct 527 [2011]; *People v Manning,*78 AD3d 585, 586 [2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 861 [2011], *cert denied*565 US —, 132 S Ct 268 [2011]).

Defendant did not preserve his present claim that closure of the courtroom to the general public was unwarranted, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits *(see Waller v Georgia,*467 US 39 [1984]; *People v Ramos,*90 NY2d 490, 497 [1997], *cert denied sub nom. Ayala v New York,*522 US 1002 [1997]).

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is unreviewable on direct appeal because it involves matters outside the record concerning counsel’s reasons for making a particular strategic choice *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 998 [1982]). On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also*
      *499
      *Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). Defendant has not shown that the single error he alleges deprived him of a fair trial or affected the outcome of the case *(see Strickland,*466 US at 694).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Spivey, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldman, J.), rendered January 14, 1985, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s conviction was based on the theft of certain *350packages from a United Parcel Service warehouse during the early morning hours of October 19, 1983. A security guard who witnessed the crime made a positive identification of the defendant approximately 10 minutes after the crime occurred and after the defendant was apprehended in the vicinity of the warehouse alongside an automobile containing the stolen packages.

The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial when the prosecutor was permitted by the trial court to cross-examine him about his use of aliases in connection with unrelated crimes previously excluded pursuant to the court’s *Sandoval*ruling *(see, People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371). Although this line of questioning and the court’s amendment of its *Sandoval*ruling in the midst of the trial were improper, these errors must be considered harmless in view of the overwhelming proof of guilt *(see, People v Jiminez,*79 AD2d 1012, *mod on other grounds*55 NY2d 895; *cf. People v Bannerman,*110 AD2d 706; *People v Evans,*88 AD2d 604).

The defendant’s claims of error in the trial court’s charge are unpreserved for review *(see, People v Thomas,*50 NY2d 467), and, in any event, are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0508. MARQUISE ALI ROBBINS v. GREGORY C. DOZIER, et al.

Marquise Ali Robbinsfiled a motion to set aside the trial court’s order granting

the motion for summary judgment filed by the Commissioner of the Georgia

Department of Corrections on Robbins’s petition for a writ of mandamus. The trial

court granted Robbins’s motion because Robbins did not receive proper notice and

reentered the order granting summary judgment in an order dated April 11, 2019. On

June 7, 2019, Robbinsfiled this pro se application for discretionary review of the trial

court’s order. We lack jurisdiction.

 The application materials show that Robbins failed to submit a file-stamped

copy of the order he seeks to appeal, in violation of Court of Appeals Rule 31 (c).

Consequently, on June 12, 2019, we ordered Robbins to supplement his application

within ten days with a stamped “filed” copy of the order to be appealed. We indicated

that failure to comply with this directive would result in dismissal of the application. 

Robbins filed a response to the order indicating that he had already filed a stamped

copy of the order, but he did not. Without the stamped “filed” copy of the order, we

cannot ascertain if the application was filed within 30 days, which is a jurisdictional

requirement.

1 See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d

57) (1989). Accordingly, Robbins’s application is hereby DISMISSED.

1 Although the order included with the application does not contain a stamped

“filed” date, it was signed by the judge on April 11, 2019. Based on that date, the

application is untimely.

June 27, 2019
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/27/2019