alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Duane  Bittner
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Utilities Services Repairer Operator
                        Phone: (785) 712-3181
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Case 3:15-cv-00613-MA Document 39 Filed 10/03/16 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonel LUNA-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10803.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007.*

Filed April 20, 2007.

Jacki Lynn Ireland, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Bruce A. Alldredge, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Leonel Luna-Perez appeals from the district court’s order revoking supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Luna-Perez contends the district court had no jurisdiction to revoke his supervised release because the revocation proceedings occurred after his term of supervised release had ended, and the arrest warrant issued before the term had ended was not supported by oath and affirmation in violation of *United States v. Vargas-Amaya,*389 F.3d 901, 907 (9th Cir.2004). Jurisdiction is a question of law we review de novo. *See id.*at 903. Regardless of whether the warrant was valid, we conclude that Luna-Perez’s term of supervised release had not expired when the district court held its revocation proceedings, because the term of supervised release was tolled while Luna-Perez was a fugitive. *See United States v. Murguia-Oliveros,*421 F.3d 951, 953 (9th Cir.2005); *United States v. Crane,*979 F.2d 687, 691 (9th Cir.1992).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Athens, Georgia
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Jason  Henning
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        IT Specialist
                        Phone: (706) 546-3975
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         27588
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3712
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1000)
<INVENTORY>                                    68461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100257
<PP&E>                                         48415
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (19343)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          980690
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4142
<OTHER-SE>                                     (811705)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173127
<SALES>                                        300584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               365550
<CGS>                                          145499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               772412
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             33167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5885528)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                        |  |                   
|----------------------- |  | ------------------
|By:                     |  | /s/ Alvin Murstein
|Chairman and           
|Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 6, 2011



Page 66 of 67
February 20, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON, 

Appellant

NO. 14-13-00232-CV V.

RAKISHA DICKERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LONDYN R'MANI DICKERSON, 

DECEASED, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from an order denying the University of Texas Health 

Science Center at Houston’s plea to the jurisdiction signed February 22, 2013, was 

heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find the 

trial court erred in denying the plea. We therefore order the order of the court 

below REVERSED and RENDER judgment dismissing the suit filed by Rakisha 

Dickerson, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Londyn 

R’Mani Dickerson, Deceased against the University of Texas Health Science 

Center at Houston for lack of jurisdiction.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Rakisha Dickerson, Individually and as Personal Representative of the 

Estate of Londyn R’Mani Dickerson, Deceased.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0474 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BENJAMIN PITKANEN III ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 30 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 25 2021

05/25/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0474
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Davis, California
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Richard  Stoker
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        IT Specialist
                        Phone: (530) 752-5312
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DENNIS JEFCOAT; DONNA 

JEFCOAT, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TERESA FOREMAN; CITY OF 

CHILOQUIN, 

Defendants. 

PANNER, District Judge: 

MEDFORD DIVISION 

1:15-cv-00456-CL 

ORDER 

On April 29, 2016, Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a 

Findings and Recommendation (#39), and the matter is now before 

this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). 

Plaintiffs have filed objections (#43), Defendants have responded 

to Plaintiffs' objections (#44) and I have reviewed the file of 

1 - ORDER 

Case 1:15-cv-00456-CL Document 45 Filed 06/23/16 Page 1 of 2
this case de nova. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas 

Corp. v. Corrnnodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 

1981) . 

I have given this matter de nova review. I find no error. 

Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recorrnnendation. Plaintiffs' 

Amended Motion for Partial Surrnnary Judgment (#28) is DENIED. 

Defendants' Motion for Surrnnary Judgment (#20) is GRANTED. 

Judgment is for Defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 7-:::3 day of June, 2016. 

OWEN M. PANNER 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

2 - ORDER 

Case 1:15-cv-00456-CL Document 45 Filed 06/23/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,136
<SECURITIES>                                       620
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,421
<SALES>                                          5,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,582
<CGS>                                            4,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)     
        

</TABLE>
#### BUHANNAN, Appellant, v. SOWLE et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 29, 1896.)

Action by Charles L. Buhannan against Alexander Sowle, John Cochrane, and Sarah B. Sowle.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. ¡
----

**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION**

|                                |                                                                  |   |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:                August 9, 2006 | /s/                George W. Haligowski      |   |
|                                | George                W. Haligowski                                   |   |
|                                | Chairman                of the Board, President and                   |   |
|                                | Chief                Executive Officer                                |   |

| Date:                August 9, 2006 | /s/                Timothy M. Doyle        |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                | Timothy                M. Doyle                                          |   |
|                                | Executive                Managing Director and                           |   |
|                                | Chief                Financial Officer                                   |   |
#### Henry Wittenbrock, Respondent, *v.*L. Mabins et al.

(Argued October 6, 1890;

decided October 14, 1890.)

Appeal by Egbert ITcbtmann from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first" judicial department, made June 9, 1890, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate a subpoena directing appellant to appear and testify before a commission appointed to take his deposition.

*Henry C. Willcox*for appellant.

*A. B. Porter*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7549

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-01-240, CA-01-2795-8-20)

Submitted: October 24, 2001 Decided: November 26, 2001

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William M. Bryson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Bryson, Nos. CR-01-240; CA01-2795-8-20 (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2001). Additionally, we deny Bryson’s

motion for release pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1702 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1702

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to change 
 the special rate of duty on purified terephthalic acid imported from 
                                Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 1998

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to change 
 the special rate of duty on purified terephthalic acid imported from 
                                Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEREPHTHALIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subheading 2917.36.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``1.8 cents/kg + 
8.9% (MX)'' in the special rates of duty subcolumn and inserting 
``,MX'' in the parenthetical after ``J''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Ralph T. Finkenbrink certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nicholas Financial, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: November 10, 2005       /s/ Ralph T. Finkenbrink Ralph T. Finkenbrink    Senior Vice President    and Chief Financial Officer