alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,278
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,848
<PP&E>                                           2,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,581
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,923
<SALES>                                         19,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,155
<CGS>                                           13,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  86
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                       622
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,135
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Physiology and Genetics Research: Maricopa, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Main Page - ALARC
                                    Pest Management and Biocontrol Unit
                                    Water Management and Conservation Unit
                                    Western Regional Biomass Research Center
                    About UsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Maricopa, Arizona U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center Plant Physiology and Genetics Research People & Locations







Skye  Bradley
                        Plant Physiology and Genetics Research

                        




                        
                        BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone: (520) 316-6361
                        
                        
                        Fax: (520) 316-6330(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 5.1

                          Dolgenos Newman & Cronin LLP
                -------------------------------------------------

                1001 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y. 10018
                        Tel 212-925-2800 Fax 212-925-0690


                                                              December 20, 2005

Synergx Systems Inc.
209 Lafayette Drive
Syosset, NY 11791

         Re:      1997 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan
                  SEC FILE 333-107231

Gentlemen:

We have acted as counsel to Synergx  Systems Inc. (the  "Company") in connection
with the registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-8 of
shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.001 (the "Shares"), which may
be  issued  in  connection  with the  above-referenced  plan  (the  "Plan").  In
connection with that registration, we have reviewed the proceedings of the Board
of Directors of the Company relating to the  registration and proposed  issuance
of the  Shares,  the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of  the  Company  and  all
amendments thereto,  the Bylaws of the Company and all amendments  thereto,  and
such other documents and matters as we have deemed necessary to the rendering of
the following opinion.

     Based upon that  review,  it is our opinion  that the Shares when issued in
conformance  with the terms and conditions of the Plan,  will be legally issued,
fully paid and nonassessable under the Delaware General Corporation Law.

     We consent to the use of this opinion in the  registration  statement filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  file  number  333-107231,  in
connection with the registration of the Shares.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        DOLGENOS NEWMAN & CRONIN LLP

                                        By   /s/   Dennis P. McConnell
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0889. KEVIN WILLIAMS v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST

COMPANY.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company filed a dispossessory action against

Kevin Williams in magistrate court. The magistrate court entered judgment in favor

of the bank, after which Williams appealed to the superior court. The superior court

dismissed the appeal, and Williams then filed a notice of appeal to this Court.

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court

decision, Williams was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); Dean’s Catering v. Strum & Associates, 231 Ga. App. 202

(498 SE2d 786) (1998); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175)

(1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which

is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/23/2015

January 23, 2015
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 25, 2011

h0418 

# Order

April 25, 2011

142060

DEBRA PATE, JEFFREY PATE, PAUL ANDERSON, TANYA THOMAS, Individually, and as next friend for her minor children, JAKOB HEFFNER, CALEB HEFFNER, MICHAEL THOMAS, JAMIE ANDERSON, individually, and as next friend for her minor children, KIANNA CAIN and RIMICK CAIN, and BRIAN HORD Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 142060 COA: 297273 Dickinson CC: 09-015862-NH ALEXANDER S. JU DY, M.D., and MARQUETTE GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., d/b/a/ MARQUETTE MEDICAL CLINIC, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 23, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld now be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research Docs







2020 January Jornada IACUC Executive Summary - version 05headline bar 2020 January Jornada IACUC Executive Summary-version 05


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
NO.  07-05-0406-CR  

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	FEBRUARY 24, 2006

	______________________________

	CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH HADLEY, 

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER FOUR OF TARRANT COUNTY;

	NO. 0934194D; HON. MIKE THOMAS, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Memorandum Opinion

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Christopher Joseph Hadley (appellant) appeals his conviction for possessing marijuana.  His three issues involve the trial court’s refusal to grant his motion to suppress evidence of the contraband.  This is supposedly reversible since the marijuana was discovered as a result of an illegal stop.  We overrule the issues.

	The marijuana in question was discovered after an officer spied appellant driving from a wooded area onto Highway 360.  To get there, according to the officer, “you actually have to jump a curb.”  Furthermore, the officer knew of complaints about people dumping in that vicinity.  Consequently, he stopped appellant.  Appellant contends that the stop was improper because his conduct was as consistent with innocent activity as it was with guilty activity.  We reject the contention for several reasons.

	First, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the construct to which appellant refers is no longer viable.  Woods v. State, 956 S.W.2d 33, 38-39 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).  Thus, and contrary to appellant’s supposition, innocent activity may give rise to reasonable suspicion if the totality of the circumstances, and rational inferences therefrom, nonetheless permit an officer to reasonably conclude that the detained individual actually engaged in, was engaging in, or was about to engage in criminal conduct.  Id.

	Second, statute generally prohibits one from driving over or across a physical barrier constructed to impede vehicular traffic.  Tex. Trans. Code Ann. §545.063(b) (Vernon 1999).  Furthermore, the obstruction need not be impassible for it to be a physical barrier.   Kindell v. State, 407 S.W.2d 784, 786 (Tex. Crim. App. 1966).  Here, the officer noticed that to arrive at the location where appellant was first seen, appellant would have had to jump a curb adjacent to Highway 360.  Furthermore, a curb can be considered a physical barrier designed to impede vehicular traffic.  Given this and §545.063(b) of the Transportation Code, we conclude that circumstances existed upon which an officer could, at the very least, reasonably suspect that appellant had engaged in unlawful conduct, i.e. the violation of a traffic law.  And, that would have justified appellant’s stop.

	Accordingly, the trial court did not err in holding that the stop was lawful.  So, we affirm the judgment.       

							Brian Quinn

						          Chief Justice

Publish.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

BILLY JESS BARNARD, 3:15-cv-00389-SU

Petitioner, ORDER

v. 

 

MARION FEATHER,

 Respondent.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and

Recommendation (#8) on May 20, 2015, in which she recommends this

Court deny Petitioner’s Petition (#1) for Writ of Habeas Corpus

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and enter a judgment in favor of

Respondent. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall,

 - 1 ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00389-SU Document 11 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 2
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not

find any error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and

Recommendation (#8). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s

Petition (#1) for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 24th day of June, 2015.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

 - 2 ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00389-SU Document 11 Filed 06/24/15 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|    |  |                                                  
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall                                
|    |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 8, 2007



63
#### In the Matter of Kenneth Zahl, Petitioner, v Sherry Klein Heitler, Respondent.

[948 NYS2d 841]

— The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Catterson, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.

Motion seeking change of venue denied.
# C_2005321EN.01000301.xml

| 16.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/3

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on concentrations given at its 133rd meeting on 29 June 2005 concerning a draft decision relating to case COMP/M.2139 — Bombardier/ADtranz

(2005/C 321/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the undertaking given by Bombardier in case COMP/M.2139 — Bombardier/ADtranz of 4 April 2001 to only purchase electrical traction for trams of the type Cityrunner Linz from Elin EBG Traction, a subsidiary of VA Tech, for a period of 5 years, is no longer warranted as soon as the Commission clearance decision with conditions and obligations in case 3653 Siemens/VA Tech is adopted and in force, and, subsequently, VA Tech becomes part of Siemens. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the undertaking given by Bombardier in case COMP/M.2139 — Bombardier/ADtranz of 4 April 2001 to only purchase electrical traction for trams of the type Cityrunner Linz from Elin EBG Traction, a subsidiary of VA Tech, for a period of 5 years, is no longer warranted as soon as the Commission clearance decision with conditions and obligations in case 3653 Siemens/VA Tech is adopted and in force, and, subsequently, VA Tech becomes part of Siemens.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, consequently, the undertaking as described in Annex 1(b) to the decision COMP/M.2139 — Bombardier/ADtranz is repealed by the proposed decision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, consequently, the undertaking as described in Annex 1(b) to the decision COMP/M.2139 — Bombardier/ADtranz is repealed by the proposed decision.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion.

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Alyssa  Bergeson
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker
                        Phone: (515) 337-7589
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

SHEILA C. SHAFER, 

No. 3:15-cv-01489-MO 

 Plaintiff, 

v. OPINION AND ORDER

HARMONY GUEST HOME, 

INC., an Oregon Corporation,

 Defendant.

MOSMAN, J., 

Defendant Harmony Guest Home, Inc. moves this court to dismiss Plaintiff’s statutory 

Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) claim and wrongful discharge claim. Per agreement of the 

parties, Defendant’s motion to dismiss [14] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 

Defendant seeks dismissal of Plaintiff’s FMLA claim, arguing that Plaintiff’s 

employment was not covered by the FMLA. For FMLA protections to apply, an employer must 

be a covered employer and an employee must be an eligible employee. Defendant contends that 

it is not a covered employer and Plaintiff was not a covered employee as defined under 29 U.S.C. 

§ 2611. (Mot. to Dismiss [14] at 3–4.) In her response, Plaintiff concedes that Defendant was not 

a covered employer and does not oppose the dismissal of her FMLA claim on these grounds. (Pl. 

Resp. [17] at 1–2.). Therefore, Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s FMLA claim is granted. 

Defendant also seeks dismissal of Plaintiff’s wrongful discharge claim, arguing that the 

wrongful discharge claim is supported solely by Plaintiff’s FMLA claim. (Mot. to Dismiss [14] 
2 – ORDER

at 4.) Plaintiff responds that her wrongful discharge claim is supported by the Oregon Family 

Leave Act (OFLA) in addition to the FMLA. (Pl. Resp. [17] at 2.) Therefore, even with the 

dismissal of Plaintiff’s FMLA claim, her wrongful discharge claim can survive based on the 

OFLA. In its reply, Defendant concedes that Plaintiff adequately stated a claim for common law 

wrongful discharged based on the OFLA. (Def. Reply [18] at 1–2.) Therefore, Defendant’s 

motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s wrongful discharge claim is denied. 

Per agreement of the parties, Defendant’s motion to dismiss [14] is GRANTED in part

and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s FMLA claim is DISMISSED while Plaintiff’s wrongful 

discharge claim survives. 

DATED this 8th day of December, 2015. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge