alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.4
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Award Agreement
To Be Used For Executive Officers
As Approved February 2020


[Date]






[Name]
[Title]




Dear [Name]:


We would like to inform you that, on [Date] (the “Grant Date”), Assured Guaranty granted you the right to receive a non-equity incentive compensation award for [Year] (the “Award”) under the Assured Guaranty Ltd. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”).  You have been granted this Award in order to provide you with an incentive to work for and share in Assured Guaranty’s continued growth during [Year].  


The Award entitles you to the right to receive a payment (the “Cash Incentive”) equal to the amount determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Assured Guaranty Ltd. (the “Committee”) consistent with the scorecard enclosed herewith.  The Cash Incentive shall be paid to you between January 1, [Following Year] and March 15, [Following Year] following the date that the Committee certifies the results for the enclosed scorecard.   The amount of the Cash Incentive payable to you in accordance with the scorecard is subject to reduction by the Committee based on such factors as the Committee determines to be appropriate.


You will be entitled to the Cash Incentive for [Year] only if you remain employed through the payment date of the Cash Incentive and the applicable performance goals in the enclosed scorecard are satisfied as determined by the Committee.  If you are not employed through the payment date of the Cash Incentive, then you will forfeit the Cash Incentive for [Year].  


The Committee has the authority to interpret the LTIP and the enclosed scorecard, and to make the final determination of whether you are entitled to payment of the Cash Incentive.


Sincerely,








Ivana M. Grillo
Senior Managing Director,
Human Resources




















EXHIBIT A


Executive Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Terms


PERFORMANCE YEAR:    [_____________]
POSITION TITLE:        [_____________]
EMPLOYEE NAME:        [_____________]
DEPARTMENT:        [_____________]


Non-Equity Incentive Payout = the product of:


		
	(i)
	(Base Salary * Individual Target Cash Incentive Multiple) and 


		
	(ii)
	(Financial Goal Achievement Score (weighted 67%) + Individual Non-Financial Objective Achievement Score (weighted 33%))




Maximum achievement score = 200% of target weighting
	
							
	[Year] Base Salary: 
	[_____________]
	 

	[Year] Individual Target Cash Incentive Multiple: 
	[_____________]
	 

	Financial Performance Measures:
	[Year] Target
	[Year] Results
	Weighting
	Achievement Score
(0-200%)
	Weighted Achievement Score

	[Financial Performance Measures]
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	67.0%
	 
	 








	
						
	Individual Non-Financial Performance Measures:
	[Year] Objectives
	[Year] Results
	Weighting
	

Achievement Score
(0-200%)
	Weighted Achievement Score

	Contribution Towards CEO’s 
Non-Financial Performance Measures
	 
	 
	16.5%
	 
	 

	Individual Performance Objectives
	 
	 
	16.5%
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	33%
	 
	 

	Achievement Score
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 2, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Consortium for Execution of Rendezvous and Servicing Operations (“CONFERS”) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Redwire Space, Inc, Jacksonville, FL; Voyager Space Holdings, Inc, Denver, CO; Kurs Orbital, Inc, Groton, CT; and Neutronstar Systems UG, Cologne, GERMANY have been added as parties to this venture.                

In addition, Space Law & Policy Solutions, E. Rochester, NH; Marsh McLennan, New York, NY; and KinetX Aerospace, Inc, Tempe, AZ have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and CONFERS intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On September 10, 2018, CONFERS filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 19, 2018 (81 FR 53106).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 04, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 24, 2021 (86 FR 27894).                

Suzanne Morris, 

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2021-18032 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commerce Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          |  |                                                                    |  |                 
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------
|Signatures                                |  | Title                                                              |  | Date            
|                                          |  |                                                                   
|/s/ Robert E. Maxwell Robert E. Maxwell   |  | Chairman of the Board & Director                                   |  | October 15, 2007
|                                          |  |                                                                   
|/s/ Daniel L. Hefner Daniel L. Hefner     |  | Chief Executive Officer, President & Director                      |  | October 15, 2007
|                                          |  |                                                                   
|/s/ Frank D. Puissegur Frank D.
Puissegur |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Director |  | October 15, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 6:14-CR-00482-MC-01

JURY NOTE

DANIEL STEPHEN JOHNSON,

Defendant. 

 

Judge: Michael J. McShane

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

JURY NOTE

Case 6:14-cr-00482-MC Document 232 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 2
· Yn ~Jvon_ 

• I r 01 dlrOt( p?L{JVnl1 . 

fl:/ lAkl /dJ!/s /.>I 

'''~·~•···'''''"-'·"·''·'r••i ·, · ·.' ••r•· ,c.' .. 'J·e, ···• ''''"~··-·"-''= , ,, . .- ,~,,.,,.~,.~,·!~'''''···~~ 

Case 6:14-cr-00482-MC Document 232 Filed 05/16/18 Page 2 of 2
Order filed, November 6, 2017.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-17-00835-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.F. AND K.A., CHILDREN, Appellant

V.

DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 313th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 2016-05332J

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due 11/02/2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has 

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.

We order Rachel Game, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record 

in this appeal, if any, within 10 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
#### In the Matter of Tori Lannaman, Appellant, v Tina Minus, Respondent.

[945 NYS2d 575]

*757In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the father appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Sammarco, J.), both dated July 12, 2011, which, after a hearing, inter alia, dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family Court, and its determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to considerable deference on appeal *(see Matter of Sepulveda v Perez,*90 AD3d 1057 [2011]; *Matter of DosReis v Rousseau,*85 AD3d 1028, 1029 [2011]; *Matter of Richardson v Richardson,*80 AD3d 32, 43-44 [2010]; *Matter of Fiore v Fiore,*34 AD3d 803 [2006]).

Here, the Family Court’s determination that the father failed to establish acts constituting a family offense was based upon its assessment of the parties’ credibility and is supported by the record *(see Matter of Sepulveda v Perez,*90 AD3d 1057 [2011]; *Matter of DosReis v Rousseau,*85 AD3d 1028 [2011]; *Matter of Richardson v Richardson,*80 AD3d 32 [2010]; *Matter of King v Flowers,*13 AD3d 629 [2004]). Moreover, under the circumstances here, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the father’s request for an adjournment in order to obtain previously subpoenaed telephone records (s*ee Matter of Anthony M.,*63 NY2d 270, 283 [1984]; *Garritano v Garritano,*62 AD3d 657, 658 [2009]; *Cabral v Cabral,*35 AD3d 779, 779-780 [2006]; *People v Perez,*249 AD2d 492 [1998]).

Since the allegations in the petition were not established, the Family Court properly dismissed the petition *(see Matter of Aruti v Aruti,*88 AD3d 700, 701 [2011]; *Matter of Rivera v Quinones-Rivera,*15 AD3d 583 [2005]; *Matter of King v Flowers,*13 AD3d 629 [2004]). Angiolillo, J.P., Florio, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Subtropical Horticulture Research: Miami, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Miami, Florida Subtropical Horticulture Research People & Locations







Jin  Li
                        Subtropical Horticulture Research

                        




                        
                        ORISE participant
                        Phone: (786) 573-7074
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit No


Exhibit No. 10.2

Form of Waiver

COASTAL BANKING COMPANY, INC.



Senior Executive Officer Waiver 



In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.

I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program.  This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship.




(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Senior Executive Officer Waiver on this  ______ day of December, 2008.




			
	 
	By: 

	 

	 
	 
	Name: [OFFICER NAME]

Title: [OFFICER TITLE]
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Grant  Peterson
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Engineering Equipment Operator
                        Phone: (515) 357-7830
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### NOYAC COTTAGE ASS’N v. WHITESIDE. SAME v. ATWATER. SAME v. WHITNEY.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Actions by the Noyac Cottage Association against Newton E. Whiteside, Henry G. Atwater, and Lucius J. Whitney.

No opinion. Exceptions overruled, and judgment ordered on the verdicts with costs. All concur.
# EUR-Lex - 52006DP0426 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006DP0426

**European Parliament decision on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Mario Borghezio (2006/2151(IMM)) **

*
Official Journal 313 E , 20/12/2006 P. 0065 - 0066 *

P6_TA(2006)0426

Defence of immunity of Mario Borghezio

European Parliament decision on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Mario Borghezio (2006/2151(IMM))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the request by Mario Borghezio for defence of his immunity, forwarded by letter of 23 May 2006 and announced in plenary sitting on 1 June 2006,

- having heard Mario Borghezio in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

- having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986 [1] of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,

- having regard to Article 68 of the Constitution of the Italian Republic,

- having regard to Rules 6(3) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0329/2006),

1. Decides not to defend the immunity and privileges of Mario Borghezio.

[1] Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391.

--------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60822

Conference Calendar

CARL WATTS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT BAILEY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:05-CV-122 

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Carl Watts, Mississippi prisoner # 77138, appeals the

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) dismissal as frivolous of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit against a state-court judge. Although

he renews the allegations of his complaint, Watts does not

challenge the district court’s conclusion that his claims

were either unexhausted within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(b)(1)(A) or failed because Judge Bailey is entitled to

absolute judicial immunity. By failing to brief any argument

challenging the district court’s reasons for dismissal, Watts has
No. 05-60822

-2-

abandoned the only grounds for appeal. See Yohey v. Collins,

985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). The appeal is wholly

without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is therefore dismissed. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th

Cir. 1983). 

The district court’s dismissal of Watts’ complaint counts

as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as does the

dismissal of the instant appeal. See Adepegba v. Hammons,

103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Watts has accumulated two

strikes in Watts v. Oglesby, No. 05-60853 (5th Cir. Aug. 25,

2006). Because Watts has now accumulated more than three

strikes, he is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in any

civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained

in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.  Dial Call Midwest, Inc. (DE)
NCI 900 Spectrum Holdings, Inc. (DE)
ACI 900, Inc. (DE)
FCI 900, Inc. (DE)
Nextel Finance Company (DE)
Nextel of California, Inc. (DE)
Nextel Boost of California, LLC (DE)
Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.(DE)
Nextel Technology Laboratories, LLC (DE)
Nextel License Acquisition Corp. (DE)
Nextel of New York, Inc. (DE)
Nextel Operations, Inc. (DE)
Nextel Retail Stores, Inc. (DE)
Nextel South Corp. (GA)
Nextel License Holdings 1, Inc. (DE)
Nextel License Holdings 3, Inc. (DE)
Nextel Systems Corp. (DE)
Nextel of Texas, Inc. (TX)
Nextel West Corp. (DE)
Nextel West Services, LLC (DE)
Nextel License Holdings 2, Inc. (DE)
Nextel License Holdings 4, Inc. (DE)
Nextel of Puerto Rico, Inc. (Puerto Rico)
Nextel License Holdings 5, Inc. (Puerto Rico)
Tower Parent Corp. (DE)
Unrestricted Subsidiary Funding Company (DE)
Nextel 220 License Acquisition Corp. (DE)
Nextel Spectrum Acquisition Corp. (DE)
Nextel Broadband, Inc. (DE)
NXLD Company (DE)
Nextel Data Investments 1, Inc. (DE)
Nextel Unrestricted Relocation Corp. (DE)
Nextel 700 Guard Band Corp. (fka Nextel Asset Acquisition Co., Inc.) (DE)
Unrestricted UMTS Funding Company (DE)
Nextel UK Ltd. (fka Nextel 3G Acquisition Ltd.) (United Kingdom)
Domestic UFS Corp. (DE)
Nextel Aviation, Inc. (DE)
Falcon Administration, LLC (WA)
Nextel WIP Corp. (DE)
Unrestricted Subscriber Equipment Leasing Company, Inc. (DE)
Nextel Boost Investment, Inc. (fka NextServ, Inc.) (DE)
Boost Mobile, LLC (DE)
Boost Worldwide, Inc. (DE)
NCI 700, Inc. (DE)
Nextel China Holding Company (fka Unrestricted Alaska Subsidiary Company) (DE)
Unrestricted Extend America Investment Corp. (DE)