alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2007
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Peter L. Vosotas                 
|Peter L. Vosotas                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|Dated: November 9, 2007
**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: November 10, 2005 |  /s/                  HARRY J. WHITE, JR.                            Harry                  J. White, Jr. |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
(10 App. Div. 541.)

#### GRACE v. BOWDEN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 8, 1896.)

Vendor and Purchaser—Sufficiency of Title—Lis Pendens.

A title is not rendered doubtful by the mere existence of lis pendens on the record, but to justify its rejection by a purchaser, and entitle him to recover for breach of contract to convey, where conveyance is offered, he must show that doubt was created by the character of the claim made in the action to which the lis pendens referred.

Appeal from trial term, Kings county.

Action by Patrick J. Grace against Ellen Bowden for breach of contract. From a judgment entered on a verdict directed by the court in favor of defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and CULLEN, BARTLETT, HATCH, and BRADLEY, JJ.

Edward G. Nelson, for appellant.

Benjamin Patterson, for respondent.

WILLARD BARTLETT, J.

The plaintiff rejected the title offered him by the defendant under a contract for the purchase of *61real estate, and by this action sought to recover $1,000 which he had paid upon the execution of the contract, and $1,000 as liquidated damages for the breach of the agreement. The objections to the title were not such as to justify the course of the plaintiff in refusing to accept it. The mere existence of the notice of lis pen-dens on record in the case of Prentiss v. Bowden, 145 N. Y. 342, 40 N. E. 13, was not enough to make the title doubtful. The objecting party was bound to go further, and show that doubt was created by the character of the claim which was made in the suit to which the notice of lis pendens referred. Simon v. Vanderveer, 84 Hun, 452, 32 N. Y. Supp. 394; Hayes v. Nourse, 114 N. Y. 595, 22 N. E. 40. This the plaintiff did not do in the case at bar. On the contrary, the proceedings in the suit in .which the notice of lis pendens had been filed showed that the claim made therein was without validity, as has since been decided by the court of appeals. Prentiss v. Bowden, 145 N. Y. 342, 40 N. E. 13. The appellant contends that such claim was maintainable under chapter 740 of the Laws of 1894; but the decision of the court of appeals, which was not rendered until March, 1895, long after the amendatory statute took effect, seems conclusive against him on this point. The plaintiff should take the title offered by the defendant. If he continues to refuse to do so, he must lose what he has already paid on the contract.

The judgment and order below were right, and should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### Ronald Joseph, as Administrator of the Estate of Kester Joseph, Sr., Deceased, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

d0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

138692

CITY OF CENTER LINE,Plaintiff/CounterDefendant-Appellant,

v SC: 138692 COA: 289248 Macomb CC: 2 008-001037-CL POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN, INC., and ANGELA POST,Defendants/CounterPlaintiffs-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Tifton, Georgia
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Toby  Douglas
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Custodial Worker
                        Phone: (229) 386-2371
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
February 20 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE UNIVERSITY OF TE XAS HEALTH SCIENCE C ENTER AT HOUSTON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00232

- CV V.

RAKISHA DICK ERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF LONDYN R 'MANI DICKERSON, DECEASED , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from an order denying the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston’s plea to the jurisdiction signed February 22, 2013 , was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find the trial court erred in denying the plea . We therefore order the order of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment dismissing the suit filed by Rakisha Dickerson, Individually and as Personal Represent ative of the Estate of Londyn R’ Mani Dickerson, Deceased against the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston for lack of jurisdiction

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, Rakisha Dickerson, Individually and as Personal Represent ative of the Estate of Londyn R’ Mani Dickerson, Deceased.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Conservation and Production Research Laboratory: Bushland, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Livestock Nutrient Management
                                    Soil and Water Management
                    Who We AreSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Bushland, Texas Conservation and Production Research Laboratory Docs







IACUC Executive Summaryheadline bar  May, 2024


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
S. AMANDA MARSHALL, OSB #95347 

United States Attorney 

District of Oregon 

LEAH K. BOLSTAD, OSB #05203

Assistant United States Attorney 

Leah.Bolstad@usdoj.gov

1000 S.W. Third Ave., Suite 600 

Portland, OR 97204-2902 

Telephone: (503) 727-1000 

Facsimile: (503) 717-1117 

Attorneys for United States of America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

 PORTLAND DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

MORGAN ELIZABETH GODVIN, 

 

 Defendant. 

3:14-CR-00267-06-BR

MOTION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS 

CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM 

The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorney, pursuant to 

Chapter 153, Title 28, United States Code, moves this Court for an order for a writ of habeas 

corpus ad prosequendum directing the Superintendent of the facility, to deliver to the United States 

Marshal for the District of Oregon, or his duly authorized Deputy, the body of defendant named 

above, in order that the said defendant may be brought before this Court on Thursday, August 7, 

2014 at 1:30 p.m., for the purpose of arraignment, trial, and any further proceedings. 

Dated this 29th day of July 2014. 

Respectfully submitted, 

S. AMANDA MARSHALL 

United States Attorney 

s/ Leah K. Bolstad 

LEAH K. BOLSTAD, OSB #05203 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 3:14-cr-00267-HZ Document 35 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 1
#### MARINELLI, Respondent, v. FERRAND, Appellant.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County,

Additional General Term.

December 16, 1895.)

Action by Louis Marinelli against Nelson A. Ferrand. Cromwell G. Macy, for appellant. Turk J. Roth, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment reversed? new trial' ordered; costs to appellant to abide event.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Ricardo  Gomez Ruiz
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Mechanic
                        Phone: (515) 357-7627
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul
Katzeff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small
business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: |  | May 14, 2010                         
|By:   |  | /s/ Paul Katzeff                     
|      |  | Paul Katzeff, Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Janice M., Appellant, v Terrance J., Respondent.

[945 NYS2d 693]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Fiordaliza A. Rodriguez, Ref.), entered on or about June 6, 2011, which dismissed the petition for an order of protection against respondent for failure to make out a prima facie case, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition reinstated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

In determining a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a prima facie case, the evidence must be accepted as true and given the benefit of every reasonable inference that may be drawn therefrom. The issue of credibility is irrelevant and should not be considered *(Matter of Mamantov v Mamantov,*86 AD3d 540, 541 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 715 [2011]; *Matter of Ramroop v Ramsagar,*74 AD3d 1208, 1209 [2010]).

Petitioner testified that respondent, her son-in-law, threatened to have someone beat her up, told her that he would “beat [her] ass,” and threatened to hit her with a broom. If true, and giving petitioner the benefit of every reasonable inference, she established a prima facie case of the family offense of harassment in the second degree. The court rejected petitioner’s *483testimony based on her admitted use of marijuana. However, consideration of petitioner’s credibility was improper on a motion to dismiss for failure to prove a prima facie case.

The court properly dismissed the charge of disorderly conduct since there was no evidence that respondent intended to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm or that his conduct in the private residence recklessly created such a risk (Penal Law § 240.20). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1942 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1942

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals used in the 
               formulation of an HIV protease inhibitor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 3, 1998

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals used in the 
               formulation of an HIV protease inhibitor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``   9902.32.22       3-(acetyloxy)-2-                                                                          
                       methyl-Benzoic                                                                           
                       acid (CAS No.                                                                            
                       168899-58-9)                                                                             
                       (provided for                                                                            
                       in subheading                                                                            
                       2918.29.65)....  Free              No change         No change        On or before 12/   
                                                                                              31/1999           
                                                                                                              ''

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```