alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R.E.
Coffman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ R. E. Coffman,
Jr.

R. E. Coffman, Jr.
President & Chief Executive Officer
October 28, 2004

-24-

---
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 24-50125 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Victor Ines Rosales-Ramirez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:23-CR-1865-1 

______________________________ 

Before Smith, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor RosalesRamirez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Rosales-Ramirez has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

August 30, 2024 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 24-50125 Document: 42-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/30/2024
No. 24-50125 

2 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 24-50125 Document: 42-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/30/2024
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0564 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0564

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Council Directive 2002/38/EC as regards the period of application of the value added tax arrangements applicable to radio and television broadcasting services and certain electronically supplied services (COM(2006)0739 - C6-0437/2006 - 2006/0245(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 317 E , 23/12/2006 P. 0467 - 0467 *

20061223

P6_TA(2006)0564

VAT arrangements for radio and television broadcasting and other services *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Council Directive 2002/38/EC as regards the period of application of the value added tax arrangements applicable to radio and television broadcasting services and certain electronically supplied services (COM(2006)0739 — C6-0437/2006 — 2006/0245(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2006)0739) [1],

- having regard to Article 93 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0437/2006),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A6-0440/2006);

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;

3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

4. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

Amendment 2

Article 1

Article 4 (Directive 2002/38/EC)

[1] Not yet published in the OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2018

No. 04-18-00014-CV

Virginia BRETADO,

Appellant

v.

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-09066

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court signed a final judgment on September 28, 2017. Appellant timely filed a 

motion for new trial on October 27, 2017. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on 

December 27, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). A motion for extension of time to file the notice 

of appeal was due on January 11, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Although appellant filed a 

notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, she did not file a 

motion for extension of time. 

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for 

extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the 

predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing 

to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C). 

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to file, within fifteen days from the date of this order, a 

response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely 

manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Amendment No. 2 to 2000 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.7 
 MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
 2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”) of ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is hereby amended by deleting all references to “CMGI, Inc.” and substituting in lieu thereof “ModusLink Global Solutions,
Inc.” 
 *********** 
  

	
	Adopted by the Board of Directors on
	September 24, 2008
#### Nancy Hadgraft et al., Appellants, v Paul Morin et al., Respondents.

[941 NYS2d 513]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Martin, J.), dated January 13, 2011, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the plaintiff Nancy Hadgraft (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) was able to identify the cause of her fall on the night of the subject accident as her inability to see the small single-step riser on the walkway she was traversing on the defendants’ premises.

Furthermore, the defendants failed to meet their initial burden of establishing their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, as a triable issue of fact existed as to whether the area near the single-step riser was sufficiently lit on the night of the accident and whether the single-step riser was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous *(see Kempter v Horton,*33 AD3d 868 [2006]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Florio, J.E, Lott, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Fort Pierce, Florida
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida People & Locations







Marcus  Martinez
                        Fort Pierce, Florida

                        




                        
                        BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0082 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0082

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation repealing Regulation (EC) No 3690/93 establishing a Community system laying down rules for the minimum information to be contained in fishing licences (COM(2005)0499 - C6-0354/2005 - 2005/0205(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 291 E , 30/11/2006 P. 0243 - 0244 *

P6_TA(2006)0082

Minimum information to be contained in fishing licences *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation repealing Regulation (EC) No 3690/93 establishing a Community system laying down rules for the minimum information to be contained in fishing licences (COM(2005)0499 — C6-0354/2005 — 2005/0205(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2005)0499) [1],

- having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0354/2005),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A6-0037/2006),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;

3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

4. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

Amendment 1

Recital 3a (new)

(3a) Regulation (EC) No 1281/2005 modifies the provisions of Community law applying to fishing licences in order to adapt the minimum information requirements and to clarify the role of the fishing license in the management of fleet capacity.

Amendment 2

Recital 3b (new)

(3b) A number of stocks in Community waters have continued to decline and it is consequently necessary to improve and extend existing conservation measures; in this respect fishing licences provide a flexible and useful management tool.

Amendment 3

Recital 3c (new)

(3c) The objective should be to provide for rational and responsible exploitation of living aquatic resources, while recognising the interest of the fisheries sector in its long-term development and its economic and social conditions and the interest of consumers, taking into account the biological constraints with due respect for the marine eco-system.

Amendment 4

Recital 3d (new)

(3d) Conservation decisions have important effects on the economic and social development of those regions of the Member States where fishing is an important industry.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Matthew  Smith
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Building Management Specialist
                        Phone: (785) 712-3120
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit: Griffin, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Griffin, Georgia Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit People & Locations







Betiel H Meles
                        Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid
                        Phone: (770) 228-7254
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### NEW YORK & WESTCHESTER WATER CO. v. MORNING JOURNAL ASS’N.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 29, 1896.)

Pleading—Frivolous Demurrer—Action eor Libel.

Where a complaint for libel alleges that the words were published with a malicious intent to injure plaintiff’s business, but does not, in terms, allege that they were spoken of and concerning plaintiff, a demurrer to the complaint will not be *held*frivolous.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Action by the New York & Westchester Water Company against the Morning Journal Association for libel. Defendant demurred to the complaint. From an order granting judgment in favor of *273plaintiff on the ground that the demurrer was frivolous, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and BARRETT, PATTERSON, and INGRAHAM, JJ.

B. F. Einstein, for appellant.

Franklin Bien, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The words claimed to be libelous are not in terms alleged to be spoken of and concerning the plaintiff. The learned judge below held that equivalent words are‘alleged. This, however, does not seem to be borne out by what was actually alleged. The allegation was that the words were published with the malicious intent and purpose to injure the business of the plaintiff. This is not an averment that the words were spoken of and concerning the plaintiff, nor is it equivalent thereto. The same observations apply to the other statements referred to by the learned judge. It is quite clear, at all events, that whether the words stated were equivalent to the necessary words was not so evident as to justify the treatment of the demurrer as frivolous. The parties should at least have been permitted to argue the demurrer in the ordinary course at special term.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Eileen  Yoon
                        Foreign Animal Disease Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Lab Technician
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-98100), the
Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-09841), and the Prospectus constituting part of Post-Effective Amendment
No.1 on Form S-3 to Form SB-2 (No. 33-78940) of Innovative Tech Systems, Inc. of
our report dated April 27, 1998 appearing on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.



PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

April 27, 1998
#### Melissa Moreira, Respondent, v Paulino Ramos, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 87]-

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann BriganttiHughes, J.), entered July 20, 2011, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was injured when she came in contact with defendant’s vehicle. Defendant testified that plaintiff, while “messing with a radio,” walked into the passenger side of his van as she attempted to cross the street in the middle of the block from be*562tween two parked cars. Defendant also stated that he was driving between 10 and 15 miles per hour at the time of impact. Plaintiff had a limited recollection of the accident, but she remembered reaching the corner of the intersection and that she was not listening to music. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, triable issues of fact exist as to whether plaintiff was in an intersection crossing at the time of the accident and whether defendant failed to exercise due care to avoid the accident *(see Wein v Robinson,*92 AD3d 578 [2012]; *Villaverde v Santiago-Aponte,*84 AD3d 506 [2011]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Andrias, Catterson, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.