alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      EXHIBIT 11.0
                                            COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



                                                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                                  MARCH 31,
                                                                                  ---------------------------------------
                                                                                         1999                  1998
                                                                                  -----------------     -----------------
                                                                                   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 


<S>                                                                                    <C>                    <C>     
Net income.................................................................            $    (10)              $     65
                                                                                      ----------             ---------
Average shares outstanding.................................................                 365                    398
                                                                                      ---------              ---------
Per share amount...........................................................            $  (0.03)              $   0.16
                                                                                      =========              =========

Net income.................................................................            $    (10)              $     65
                                                                                      ---------              ---------
Average shares outstanding.................................................                 365                    398
Net effect of dilutive stock options based on the treasury stock                                                        
     method using the average market price or quarter end price,                                                        
     whichever is greater..................................................                  12                     --
                                                                                      ---------              ---------
          Total shares outstanding.........................................                 377                    398
                                                                                      ---------              ---------
Per share amount...........................................................            $  (0.03)              $   0.16
                                                                                      =========              =========
</TABLE>





                                                          17
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Ithaca, New York
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Kristin L Slavick
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Office Automation Assistant
                        Phone: (607) 255-8002
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 El Reno, Oklahoma
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Clendon  Tucker
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Research Station Operations Manager
                        Phone: (405) 262-5291
                        
                        
                        Fax: (405) 262-0133(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)
                            ProjectsCooperative production of hay and other forage crops on USDA/ARS property at Grazinglands Research Laboratory in El Reno, OK
                                                    Non-Funded Cooperative Agreement
                                                                    (N)Accession Number: 435939


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Wort h

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00047

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 431st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 20

- 7122

- 431
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker 

### J OE 

### E RVIN 

### L OCKRIDGE 

### , Appellant

V



### . S TEPHANIE 

### M ARTIN 

### , Appellee2 MEMORAN DUM OPINION Appellant Jo e Ervin Lockridge attempts to appeal from the trial court ’ s order granting appellee Stephanie Martin ’ s m otion to transfer venue. Because we do not have jurisdiction over Lockridge ’ s attempted appe al, we dismi ss. Lockridge fi led suit ag ainst , among other s , Martin in her official capacity as a D a llas County assistant district attorney , raising multiple tort claims

. Martin moved to transfer venue of Lockridge ’ s claims against her to Dallas Co unty be cause his claims were against a governmental entity

— an assistant district attorney in her official capacity

— setting mandat ory venue in Dallas County. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.
Code An n. § 15.015. The trial court granted the motion to transfer venue

. Lo ckridge
filed a notice of appeal from the order. We have jur isdic tion to consider a ppeal s only from final judgment s or from
interlo c utory orders mad e immediately ap pealable by statute. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The trial court ’ s venue ord er was not a final judgment , and a ruling on a moti on to transf er venue is not subject to interlocutory appeal

. 1 See Tex. R. Ci

v. P. 87(6). We notified Lockridge that we questioned our jurisdi ction over his appeal and
g ave him an opportunity to show grounds to continue it

. Se e Tex. R. App. P. 4 2. 3,

1 Lockridge ’ s suit does not involve m ultiple plaintiffs , which would permit an interlo cutory a ppeal under certain c ircumstances

. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Co d e Ann. § 15.003(b).3

44.3. Lockridg e responded but did not establish jurisdiction al grounds supporting hi s appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss Lockridge ’ s appeal for want of jurisdict ion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a) , 43.2(f)

. /s/ Brian Walker Brian Walker J ustice
Delivered: April 15, 2021
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Thurston Ingraham, Deceased. Corda Ingraham, Respondent; Earl J. Parker, Appellant.

Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tanh Huu LAM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-15030.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*740Submitted April 16, 2007.*

Filed April 19, 2007.

Robert Steven Lapham, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Tanh Huu Lam, Leavenworth, KS, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Tanh Huu Lam appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from the order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

Lam’s motion seeks relief from an alleged defect in the federal habeas proceedings. His motion thus should have been treated as a motion pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) rather than as an unauthorized second or successive § 2255 motion. *See Gonzalez v. Crosby,*545 U.S. 524, 533, 125 S.Ct. 2641, 162 L.Ed.2d 480 (2005).

Nevertheless, we affirm the district court’s decision because Lam’s Rule 60(b) motion fails on the merits. The allegedly fraudulent conduct of various attorneys and the district court related to earlier proceedings and otherwise has no bearing on the district court’s conclusion that Lam’s § 2255 claims were procedurally defaulted. Lam therefore fails to show that the dismissal of his § 2255 motion warrants reconsideration. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3) and (6).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 EARL MAYFIELD,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. NO. 28,701

5 BILL T. TINKER,

6 Defendant-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

8 Linda M. Vanzi, District Judge

9 Earl Mayfield

10 Albuquerque, NM

11 Pro Se Appellant

12 Bill T. Tinker

13 Albuquerque, NM

14 Pro Se Appellee

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 CASTILLO, Judge.

17 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

18 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
2

1 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

2 Affirmed.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 ________________________________

5 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 

6 WE CONCUR:

7 ________________________________

8 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

9 ________________________________

10 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
734 A.2d 1284

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Hector LAUREANO-ALVARADO, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 3, 1999.

Decided Sept. 9, 1999.

Joseph C. Madenspacher, District Attorney, Susan E. Moyer, Asst. District Attorney, District Attorney’s Office, for Com.

James J. Karl, Chief Public Defender, Public Defender’s Office, for Hector Laureano-Alvarado.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas dated November 9, 1998. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
EXHIBIT 1 

Page 1 of 4

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 92-1 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 1 

Page 2 of 4

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 92-1 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 4
EXHIBIT 1 

Page 3 of 4

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 92-1 Filed 12/22/20 Page 3 of 4
EXHIBIT 1 

Page 4 of 4

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 92-1 Filed 12/22/20 Page 4 of 4
# C_2006020EN.01001501.xml

| 27.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/15

---

UNIFORM APPLICATION OF THE COMBINED NOMENCLATURE (CN)

UNIFORM APPLICATION OF THE COMBINED NOMENCLATURE (CN)

(Classification of goods)

(2006/C 20/04)

Explanatory Notes adopted in accordance with the procedure defined in Article 10 (1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 (2).

1

2

The ‘Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Communities (3)’ are amended as follows:

3

Page 45

Delete the paragraph ‘0713 90 10 and 0713 90 90’ and insert the following text:

| 0713 39 00 | Other
  This subheading includes horsegram (formerly Dolichos sinensis
  spp. sesquipedalis), which is to be considered as a bean of the species Vigna. The names ‘Dolichos unguiculata’ and ‘Dolichos sinensis’ are synonyms no longer in use for beans of the species Vigna. Consequently, the horsegram is correctly named ‘Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. spp. sesquipedalis’. |
| --- | --- |
| 0713 90 00 | Other
  This subheading includes, with the exception of the horsegram of subheading 0713 39 00, dolichos of the genus dolichos such as the lablab (Dolichos lablab), the pidgeon pea (Cajanus cajan), the jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis), the velvet bean (Mucuna utilis) and seeds of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba).
  The following are excluded from this subheading: seeds of lupins (Lupinus) and vetches of species other than Vicia faba (subheading 1209 29 10 or 1209 29 50). |

0713 39 00

0713 39 00

Other

This subheading includes horsegram (formerly Dolichos sinensis
  spp. sesquipedalis), which is to be considered as a bean of the species Vigna. The names ‘Dolichos unguiculata’ and ‘Dolichos sinensis’ are synonyms no longer in use for beans of the species Vigna. Consequently, the horsegram is correctly named ‘Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. spp. sesquipedalis’.

(

Dolichos sinensis

spp

sesquipedalis),

Vigna.

Dolichos unguiculata

Dolichos sinensis

Vigna

Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. spp. sesquipedali

0713 90 00

0713 90 00

Other

This subheading includes, with the exception of the horsegram of subheading 0713 39 00, dolichos of the genus dolichos such as the lablab (Dolichos lablab), the pidgeon pea (Cajanus cajan), the jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis), the velvet bean (Mucuna utilis) and seeds of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba).

(Dolichos lablab)

(Cajanus cajan)

(Canavalia ensiformis)

(Mucuna utilis)

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba

The following are excluded from this subheading: seeds of lupins (Lupinus) and vetches of species other than Vicia faba (subheading 1209 29 10 or 1209 29 50).

(Lupinus)

Vicia faba

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 286, 28.10.2005, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ C 256, 23.10.2002, p. 1.

3

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH EVELYN WING,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:08-cr-00324-F-1; 5:10-cv-00187-F)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Evelyn Wing, Appellant Pro Se. Joe Exum, Jr., Jennifer P. 

May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Joshua Bryan 

Royster, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Evelyn Wing seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wing

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document

Exhibit 10.2

Amendment to Employment Agreement
This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made on March 24, 2020 by and between Scientific Games Corporation, a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) and Michael Quartieri (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 15, 2015, which was then amended effective as of January 1, 2019 (the “Agreement”);
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
1.Decrease in Base Salary.  The Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end of Section 3(a):
“Effective as of April 5, 2020, Executive will be paid eighty thousand, four hundred and forty-five U.S. dollars ($80,445) of base salary until and through June 30, 2020, and Executive’s annual base salary of six hundred seventy-five thousand U.S. dollars ($675,000) is reduced by eighty thousand, four hundred and forty-five U.S. dollars ($80,445), representing the portion of his annual base salary attributable to the period from April 5, 2020 through June 30, 2020.”
2. The Company and Executive further expressly agree that the decrease in base salary set forth in Section 1 of this Amendment does not constitute “Good Reason,” as that phrase is defined in Section 4(e) of the Agreement.
3. Except as set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.  All references to the “Agreement” in the Agreement shall refer to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Any defined terms used in this Amendment and not defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Agreement.
        4. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Amendment by electronic transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed this Amendment as of March 24, 2020.
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION


By:    /s/ Shawn Williams 
Name: Shawn Williams 
Title: Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer 


        /s/ Michael Quartieri 
1








Michael Quartieri
2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ralph T Finkenbrink                          
|Ralph T. Finkenbrink                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                 
|Dated: February 9, 2009
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Martin Smiley,
EVP, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

/s/ Martin Smiley 
Martin Smiley 
EVP, CFO and General Counsel

October 13, 2010

---