IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

LORI WAKEFIELD, individually and on 

behalf of a class of others similarly 

situated, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

VISALUS, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-1857-SI 

SPECIAL VERDICT 

WE, THE JURY, being first duly sworn, unanimously find as follows: 

COUNT ONE 

Ms. Wakefield's Individual Claim 

1. Did the Plaintiff, Ms. Wakefield, prove by a preponderance of the evidence that 

the Defendant, ViSalus, Inc., made or initiated at least one telemarketing call using an artificial 

or prerecorded voice to a residential telephone line (residential landline) belonging or registered 

to Ms. Wakefie:: vi7 of the TCPA? NO 

----

If you answered "Yes" to Question No. I, please proceed to Question No. 2. If you answered 

"No" to Question No. I, please skip Question No. 2 and proceed to Question No. 3. 

PAGE 1 - SPECIAL VERDICT 

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 282 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 4
2. How many telemarketing calls using an artificial or prerecorded voice made or 

initiated to a residential telephone line (residential landline) belonging or registered to 

Ms. Wakefield did the Plaintiff prove by a preponderance of the evidence? 

___ __ y_,__ ___ (number) 

COUNT TWO 

Class Claim 

A. Mobile (Cellular) Telephones and Residential Landlines Combined 

3. Did the Plaintiff, as Class Representative, prove by a preponderance of the 

evidence that the Defendant, ViSalus, Inc., made or initiated at least one telemarketing call using 

an artificial or prerecorded voice to either: (a) a mobile (or cellular) telephone or (b) a residential 

telephone line (residential landline), belonging or registered to one or more class members other 

than Ms. Wakefield, in violation of the TCPA? 

YES ✓ NO -----

If you answered "Yes" to Question No. 3, please proceed to Question No. 4. If you answered 

"No" to Question No. 3, please skip all remaining questions and have the presiding juror date 

and sign this form. 

4. How many telemarketing calls using an artificial or prerecorded voice made or 

initiated by the Defendant, ViSalus, Inc., to either: (a) a mobile (or cellular) telephone or (b) a 

residential telephone line (residential landline), belonging or registered to one or more class 

members other than Ms. Wakefield, in violation of the TCP A, did the Plaintiff, as Class 

Representative, prove by a preponderance of the evidence? 

( 1 g50 j l/3 b (number) 

PAGE 2 - SPECIAL VERDICT 

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 282 Filed 04/12/19 Page 2 of 4
B. Mobile (Cellular) Telephones Only 

5. Did the Plaintiff, as Class Representative, prove by a preponderance of the 

evidence that the Defendant, ViSalus, Inc., made or initiated at least one telemarketing call using 

an artificial or prerecorded voice to a mobile ( or cellular) telephone belonging or registered to 

one or more class members other than Ms. Wakefield, in violation of the TCPA? 

YES / NO ----- -----

Jfyou answered "Yes" to Question No. 5, please proceed to Question No. 6. Jfyou answered 

"No" to Question No. 5, please skip Question No. 6 and proceed to Question No. 7. 

6. How many telemarketing calls using an artificial or prerecorded voice made or 

initiated by the Defendant, ViSalus, Inc., to a mobile (or cellular) telephone belonging or 

registered to one or more class members other than Ms. Wakefield, in violation of the TCP A, did 

the Plaintiff, as Class Representative, prove by a preponderance of the evidence? 

·w:e_ &1.LqNJr kJ1_ (number) 

C. Residential Landline Telephones Only 

7. Did the Plaintiff, as Class Representative, prove by a preponderance of the 

evidence that the Defendant, ViSalus, Inc., made or initiated at least one telemarketing call using 

an artificial or prerecorded voice to a residential telephone line (residential landline) belonging 

or registered to one or more class members other than Ms. Wakefield, in violation of the TCP A? 

YES~ NO -----

Jfyou answered "Yes" to Question No. 7, please proceed to Question No. 8. Jfyou answered 

"No" to Question No. 7, please skip Question No. 8 and have the presiding juror date and sign 

this form. 

PAGE 3 - SPECIAL VERDICT 

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 282 Filed 04/12/19 Page 3 of 4
8. How many telemarketing calls using an artificial or prerecorded voice made or 

initiated by the Defendant, ViSalus, Inc., to a residential telephone line (residential landline) 

belonging or registered to one or more class members other than Ms. Wakefield, in violation of 

the TCPA, did the Plaintiff, as Class Representative, prove by a preponderance of the evidence? 

Your deliberations are now complete. Please have the presiding juror date and sign this form 

and inform the Courtroom Deputy that you are ready to return to the Courtroom. 

DATED this / ;J_~ay of April, 2019. 

PAGE 4 - SPECIAL VERDICT 

Case 3:15-cv-01857-SI Document 282 Filed 04/12/19 Page 4 of 4