alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Stuttgart, Arkansas
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Jovan  Haynes
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Purchasing Agent
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001000235
<NAME> PATRIOT BANK CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                           5,097
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,873
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    194,737
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         250,235
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           245,693
<LOANS>                                        586,458
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (6,006)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,114,670
<DEPOSITS>                                     477,135
<SHORT-TERM>                                   260,124
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,863
<LONG-TERM>                                    316,118
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,114,670
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 33,284
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               22,137
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   200
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                55,621
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,236
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,826
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,795
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 722
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,423
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,407
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.42
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,314
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,087
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      813
<RECOVERIES>                                        76
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,006
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          6,006


</TABLE>
#### Nassau Chapter Civil Service Employees Association et al., Appellants, v County of Nassau, Respondent.

*574The defendant, in upgrading the plaintiffs’ titles, did not misapply any of the provisions of the governing collective bargaining agreements. The provision of the governing agreement which the plaintiffs presently seek to have applied (schedule E [4] [B]) does not apply to the facts herein because there has indisputably been no change in any of the plaintiffs’ positions. Rather, there has simply been an upgrading of their titles to a higher salary grade, and schedule E (3) (A) (1) of the governing agreement was thus properly applied. Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1762

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to authorize the Secretary

of Agriculture to extend the term of marketing assistance loans.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 16, 1998

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. BURNS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,

and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to extend the term of

marketing assistance loans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MARKETING ASSISTANCE

4 LOANS.

5 Section 133 of the Agricultural Market Transition

6 Act (7 U.S.C. 7233) is amended by striking subsection

7 (c) and inserting the following:

8 ‘‘(c) EXTENSION.—The Secretary may extend the

9 term of a marketing assistance loan made to producers
2

•S 1762 IS

1 on a farm for any loan commodity for one 6-month pe2 riod.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1361
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   27668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7451
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           403
<OTHER-SE>                                       19814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     27668
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9505)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9505)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### JONES v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 12, 1913.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Postee.

No counsel marked for appellant.

R. C. Brick ell, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Affirmed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Michael  Cowell
                        Biorisk Management

                        




                        
                        Biology Technician
                        Phone: (785) 712-3131
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
JOHN RICHARD OTT, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

1J'.f THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Case No. 6: 14-cv-O 1619-TC 

, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDERFORPAYMENTOFATTORNEY 

COMMISSIONER, FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

Social Security Administration , 

Defendant. 

It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $5,622.19 are hereby awarded 

to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of 

this award shall be paid via check made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintif:f s attorneys at 

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C., 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. The 

award shall be made payable to Plaintif:f s attorney if the Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff 

owes no debt to the government through the Federal Treasury Offset program. There are no 

costs or expenses to be paid herein. 

Dated this (a____dayof~2016. 

Case 6:14-cv-01619-TC Document 33 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 1
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0509 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0509

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (COM(2005)0280 - C6-0288/2005 - 2005/0124(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 316 E , 22/12/2006 P. 0116 - 0116 *

P6_TA(2006)0509

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (COM(2005)0280 — C6-0288/2005 — 2005/0124(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2005)0280) [1],

- having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0288/2005),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality (A6-0306/2006),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended on 12 October 2006 [2];

2. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;

3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

4. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0414.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CURRENCY> US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       5,144,333
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     154,947,467
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,562,301
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 62,787,340
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      62,787,340
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        62,219,604
<LOANS>                                    117,453,827
<ALLOWANCE>                                (1,145,930)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             198,092,643
<DEPOSITS>                                 178,728,899
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            467,804
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,857,073
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,038,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             198,092,643
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,909,615
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,228,833
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               742,485
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,880,933
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,209,624
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,671,309
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  200,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,855,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,370,021
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,370,021
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,032,021
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.59
<LOANS-NON>                                     44,028
<LOANS-PAST>                                   447,379
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,211,934
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   73,865
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,861
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,145,931
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,145,931
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 52006BP0428 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006BP0428

**European Parliament resolution on Draft amending budget No 3/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III - Commission, Section VIII Part B - European Data Protection Supervisor (C6-0336/2006 - 2006/2119(BUD)) **

*
Official Journal 313 E , 20/12/2006 P. 0068 - 0069 *

P6_TA(2006)0428

Draft amending budget No 3/2006

European Parliament resolution on Draft amending budget No 3/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III — Commission, Section VIII Part B — European Data Protection Supervisor (C6-0336/2006 — 2006/2119(BUD))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 272(6) thereof,

- having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 177 thereof,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [1], and particularly Articles 37 and 38 thereof,

- having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, as finally adopted on 15 December 2005 [2],

- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure [3],

- having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget (PDAB) No 3/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, which the Commission presented on 22 May 2006 (SEC(2006)0633),

- having regard to Draft amending budget (DAB) No 3/2006, which the Council established on 11 July 2006 (11297/2006 — C6-0239/2006),

- having regard to its resolution of 27 September 2006 on Draft amending budget No 3/2006 of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III — Commission, Section VIII Part B — European Data-protection Supervisor [4],

- having regard to its amendments of 27 September 2006 to Draft amending budget No 3/2006 [5],

- having regard to Council's second reading on 10 October 2006 (SGS6/12736),

- having regard to Rule 69 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A6-0350/2006),

1. Takes note of the Council's second reading;

2. Confirms its decision taken at first reading;

3. Instructs its President to declare that Amending budget No 4/2006 has been finally adopted and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;

4. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the European Data Protection Supervisor.

[1] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

[2] OJ L 78, 15.3.2006.

[3] OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1. Agreement as last amended by Decision 2005/708/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 269, 14.10.2005, p. 24).

[4] Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0376.

[5] Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0375.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Stanley L. Donald *vs.*Commonwealth.

December 9, 2008.

*Supreme Judicial Court,*

Appeal from order of single justice, Superintendence of inferior courts. *Practice, Criminal,*Transcript of hearing.

Stanley L. Donald appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court concerning an order entered in the Superior Court denying his request for a free copy of his transcript. We affirm.

Donald, convicted of various offenses in the Superior Court, appealed from his sentences to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. The appeal was dismissed. He then moved in the Superior Court for a free copy of the transcript of the Appellate Division proceedings, pursuant to G. L. c. 261, § 27C (4). A judge in the Superior Court denied the motion; a “Clerk’s Notice” of the decision, addressed to Donald, was dated August 13, 2008. Thereafter, Donald filed a notice of appeal in the county court rather than in the Superior Court, as required by G. L. c. 261, § 27D. That notice was dated August 21, 2008, and was received by the clerk of the county court on August 26, 2008. The single justice, treating the matter under G. L. c. 211, § 3, denied relief without a hearing. Donald moved unsuccessfully for reconsideration.

Donald has filed a memorandum and record appendix, which we treat as filed pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21, as amended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001). The single justice neither abused his discretion nor otherwise erred in declining to afford Donald relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. Donald had an adequate alternative remedy: the proper route for one to challenge a Superior Court’s denial of a request for a free transcript is to file a notice of appeal *in the Superior Court*within seven days of being notified of the denial; the clerk of that court then notifies the judge who entered the denial; the judge issues written findings *1030and reasons for the denial; the clerk forwards those findings and any other documents on file relevant to the appeal to the clerk of the Appeals Court; and the matter is referred to a single justice of the Appeals Court for decision. See G. L. c. 261, § 27D.

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law.

*Stanley L. Donald,*pro se.

The judgment denying relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, is therefore affirmed. Because Donald mistakenly filed his notice of appeal in the county court, an order shall be entered in the county court transferring his notice of appeal to the Superior Court in Middlesex County, nunc pro tune to August 26, 2008, the date it was received by the county court. We express no view as to whether the notice was timely or whether the appeal has merit; those issues are to be resolved in the regular course pursuant to § 27D.

*So ordered.*