alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 18, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 46249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice: 2021-6024]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Banks of the United States (EXIM), as part 
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the 
proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995. This collection of information is necessary to determine 
eligibility of the underlying export transaction for EXIM insurance 
coverage.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 18, 2021 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB 10-02) or by email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#285c495a4906584d464c4d5a684d504145064f475e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="55213427347b25303b31302715302d3c387b323a23">[email protected]</span></a>, or by 
mail to Tara Pender, Export-Import Bank of the United States, 811 
Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The application tool can be reviewed 
at: https://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files/forms/eib92-41.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information, 
please Tara Pender, 202-565-3655.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-41 Application for Financial 
Institution Short-Term, Single-Buyer Insurance.
    OMB Number: 3048-0019.
    Type of Review: Renewal.
    Need and Use: The Application for Financial Institution Short-term 
Single-Buyer Insurance form will be used by financial institution 
applicants to provide EXIM with the information necessary to determine 
if the subject transaction is eligible for EXIM insurance coverage.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 215.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1.6 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 344.
    Frequency of Reporting of Use: Annual.
    Government Expenses:
    Reviewing Time per Year: 1,290 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.50.
    Average Cost per Year: $54,825 (time*wages).
    Benefits and Overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $70,176.


Bassam Doughman,
IT Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2021-17653 Filed 8-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 160 (Monday, August 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 47110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than September 7, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. Peter J. Nelson Trust (in formation), Kari A.M. Nelson, as 
trustee, both of Glenwood, Minnesota; to join the Nelson-Martinson 
Family Shareholder Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire voting 
shares of Financial Services of Lowry, Inc., Lowry, Minnesota, and 
thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Lowry State Bank, Lowry, 
Minnesota and First National Bank of Osakis, Osakis, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 18, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-18002 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
942 F.2d 799

#### CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT, Appellant, v. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, et al.

No. 90-5120.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Sept. 6, 1991.

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and WALD, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE, THOMAS, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Suggestions For Rehearing *En Banc*and appellant’s response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestions. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court *en banc,*that the suggestions are granted and this case will be considered and decided by the Court sitting *en banc.*It is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court *en banc,*that the judgment of the panel filed on April 30, 1991, 931 F.2d 939 be, and the same hereby is, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICTOF OREGON 

MARLIN BRANDT POHLMAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DR. CHRISTOPHER DIGULIO, DR. 

DANIELLE FUZI, OFFICER JOHN SMITH, 

NURSE CARTER, NURSE K. 

RICHARDSON, NURSE LANDA VERDE, 

NURSE CLEMENTS, JOE CAPPS, MARK 

NOOTH, and STATE OF OREGON 

Defendants. 

PAP AK, Magistrate Judge: 

3: 14-cv-1483-PK 

OPINION AND ORDER 

Plaintiff Marlin Brandt Pohlman filed this pro se action in Jonna pauperis on September 

17, 2014. Now before the couti is Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#88). For the 

reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's motion is denied. 

Generally, there is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case. United States v. 

30.64 Acres a/Land, 795 F.2d 796, 801 (9th Cir. 1986). However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e), this Court has discretion to request volunteer counsel for indigent plaintiffs in 

exceptional circumstances. Id.; Woodv. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335 (9th Cir. 1990); 

Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). While this Court may request 

volunteer counsel in exceptional cases, it has no power to make a mandatory appointment. 

}vfallard v. U.S. Dist. Court of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 301-08 (1989). 

In order to dete1mine whether exceptional circumstances exist, this Court evaluates the 

plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to aiiiculate his or her. 

OPINION AND ORDER PAGE I 1 

Case 3:14-cv-01483-PK Document 106 Filed 01/20/16 Page 1 of 2
claim prose in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Wood, 900 F.2d at 1335-36; 

Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331; Richards v. Harper, 864 F.2d 85, 87 (9th Cir. 1988) (quoting 

Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983)). However, "[n]either of these factors is 

dispositive and both must be viewed together before reaching a decision on request of counsd 

under [fotmer] section 1915(d)." Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331; Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 

1017 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Plaintiff has demonstrated sufficient ability to atiiculate his claims. The facts and legal 

issues involved are not of substantial complexity. Accordingly, at this stage of the proceeding, 

there are no exceptional circumstances that require the appointment of counsel under§ 1915(e). 

CONCLUSION 

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#88) is DENIED. 

Dated this 20th Day of January, 2016. 

OPINION AND ORDER PAGE I 2 

Case 3:14-cv-01483-PK Document 106 Filed 01/20/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sam KraynekChief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2005
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Curtis  Moore
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Mechanic Supervisor
                        Phone: (515) 337-7442
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1732

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel VESTERHAVEN.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9, 1998

Mr. GORTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

VESTERHAVEN.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That nothwithstanding sections 12106 and 12108 of title

4 46, United States Code, section 8 of the Passenger Vessel

5 Act (46 U.S.C. App. 289), and section 27 of the Merchant

6 Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the
2

S 1732 IS

1 coastwise trade for the vessel VESTERHAVEN (United

2 States Official Number 979206).

Æ
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1634

To guarantee honesty in budgeting.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 11, 1998

Mr. FAIRCLOTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, as modified by

the order of April 11, 1986, to the Committees on Budget, and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one committee reports, the other

committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

A BILL

To guarantee honesty in budgeting.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honest Balanced

5 Budget Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress finds the following:

8 (1) The social security system runs an annual

9 surplus that is invested in Government bonds. The

10 Treasury thus borrows the surplus, which is pro-
2

•S 1634 RIS

1 jected to approach $100,000,000,000 in 1999, and

2 spends these monies on programs unrelated to social

3 security.

4 (2) In fact, when the projected annual social se5 curity trust fund surplus is removed from the base6 line calculations through 2003, a cumulative 5-year

7 deficit of about $518,000,000,000 is added to the

8 national debt.

9 (3) The Congressional Budget Office projects

10 that the annual deficit will range from

11 $136,000,000,000 to $190,000,000,000 over the 5-

12 year budget cycle and, further, the fictional social

13 security trust fund balance will rise from

14 $730,000,000,000 to $1,380,000,000,000 during

15 this period.

16 SEC. 3. SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND PROTECTION.

17 The receipts and disbursements of the social security

18 trust funds included in the gross Federal debt shall not

19 be—

20 (1) included in the Federal budget baseline for

21 any fiscal year; and

22 (2) counted as new budget authority, outlays,

23 receipts, or deficit or surplus for purposes of—

24 (A) offsetting any tax decrease; and
3

•S 1634 RIS

1 (B) offsetting any spending increase.

Æ
1

The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United States District Judge for the District

of North Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3066

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of North Dakota.

Enrique Cahue-Rangel, also known as *

Antonio Diaz-Lopez, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 5, 2004

Filed: April 14, 2004 

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Enrique Cahue-Rangel appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed when

he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation following a conviction for an

aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Cahue-Rangel’s

counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
-2-

738 (1967), contending that, for several reasons, the district court should have

granted Cahue-Rangel a downward departure. 

We conclude, however, that the district court’s refusal to depart is

unreviewable because the court recognized its authority to depart and declined to do

so. See United States v. Koons, 300 F.3d 985, 993-94 (8th Cir. 2002).

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we deny the

government’s motion to dismiss, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the

judgment.

______________________________
#### Vincent Knudsen, Appellant, v Mamaroneck Post No. 90, Department of New York—American Legion, Inc., Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 800]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, etc., the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J), entered May 10, 2011, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiff did not know what caused the plaintiff’s decedent to fall on an interior staircase at the defendant’s premises *(see Yefet v Shalmoni,*81 AD3d 637 [2011]; *Martone v Shields,*71 AD3d 840, *1059840-841 [2010]; *Hennington v Ellington,*22 AD3d 721 [2005]; *Tejada v Jonas,*17 AD3d 448 [2005]).

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Ghany v Hossain,*65 AD3d 517 [2009]). Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the *Noseworthy*doctrine *(see Noseworthy v City of New York,*298 NY 76 [1948]) does not apply in this case, since the defendant’s knowledge as to the cause of the decedent’s accident is no greater than that of the plaintiff *(see Zalot v Zieba,*81 AD3d 935, 936 [2011]; *Kuravskaya v Samjo Realty Corp.,*281 AD2d 518 [2001]; *Gayle v City of New York,*256 AD2d 541, 542 [1998]). The plaintiff alleged that the decedent would not have fallen down the staircase if the defendant had properly latched the boiler room door, or configured it so that it did not swing open over the steps. Additionally, the plaintiffs expert opined in an affidavit that the configuration of the door and staircase violated, among other things, a provision of the Executive Law. However, the plaintiffs evidence did not raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the decedent’s fall was proximately caused by those allegedly unsafe conditions *(see Noel v Starrett City, Inc.,*89 AD3d 906 [2011]; *Ghany v Hossain,*65 AD3d at 517; *Guiterrez v Iannacci,*43 AD3d 868 [2007]; *Tejada v Jonas,*17 AD3d 448 [2005]; *Curran v Esposito,*308 AD2d 428 [2003]; *Birman v Birman,*8 AD3d 219 [2004]; *cf. Griffin v Sadauskas,*14 AD3d 930 [2005]). “Since it is just as likely that the accident could have been caused by some other factor, such as a misstep or loss of balance, any determination by the trier of fact as to the cause of the accident would be based upon sheer speculation” *(Teplitskaya v 3096 Owners Corp.,*289 AD2d 477, 478 [2001]; *see Ghany v Hossain,*65 AD3d 517 [2009]; *Reiff v Beechwood Browns Rd. Bldg. Corp.,*54 AD3d 1015 [2008]; *Hennington v Ellington,*22 AD3d at 721-722).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Balkin, J.E, Leventhal, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
# C_2005277EN.01000201.xml

| 10.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/2

---

Notification by the Republic of Austria concerning visa reciprocity (1)

1

(2005/C 277/03)

In accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 of 2 June 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement as regards the reciprocity mechanism (OJ L 141 of 4.6.2005), the Republic of Austria hereby informs you that Austrian nationals are subject to a visa requirement in the following third countries:

| — | Australia, |
| --- | --- |

—

Australia,

| — | Brazil (visa waiver for tourism purposes only, visa requirement for business trips), |
| --- | --- |

—

Brazil (visa waiver for tourism purposes only, visa requirement for business trips),

| — | Brunei (visa waiver for stays of up to 30 days only), |
| --- | --- |

—

Brunei (visa waiver for stays of up to 30 days only),

| — | Nicaragua (visa waiver for stays of up to one month only), |
| --- | --- |

—

Nicaragua (visa waiver for stays of up to one month only),

| — | Venezuela (visa waiver for stays of up to 60 days only). |
| --- | --- |

—

Venezuela (visa waiver for stays of up to 60 days only).

---

(1)  This notification is published in conformity with Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 of 2 June 2005 (OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 3) amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 (OJ L 81, 21.3.2001, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 23.1

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Kaire Holdings,
Inc., of our report dated March 30, 2003, relating to the financial statements
of Kaire Holdings, Inc., and subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2002
and 2001 which appear in such Annual Report.  We also consent to the reference
to us under the heading "Experts" in such Annual Report.




//s//  Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Co., LLP

Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Co., LLP
San Francisco, CA

                                 APRIL 14, 2003


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32-1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Synergx Systems Inc. (the
"Company")  for the year ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  Daniel S. Tamkin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 23, 2003
By: /s/ DANIEL S. TAMKIN
Daniel S. Tamkin, Chief Executive Officer
SYNERGX SYSTEMS INC.