alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006195EN.01006101.xml

| 18.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/61

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Amended Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a Cohesion Fund (Codified version)

(COM(2006) 5 final — 2003/0129 (AVC))

(2006/C 195/15)

On 28 February 2006 the Council of the European Union decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

The Section for Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 28 April 2006. The rapporteur was Mr Grasso.

At its 427th plenary session, held on 17-18 May 2006 (meeting of 17 May), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 146 votes to one with two abstentions.

| 1. | The European Economic and Social Committee supports the Commission's initiative to undertake the codification of Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 establishing the Cohesion Fund. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The European Economic and Social Committee supports the Commission's initiative to undertake the codification of Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 establishing the Cohesion Fund.

| 2. | The EESC confirms its opinion, previously expressed on several occasions, that the codification of EU rules helps to bring the European public closer to the EU's instruments. This is all the more important in the case of cohesion policy, which is central to the process of European integration. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The EESC confirms its opinion, previously expressed on several occasions, that the codification of EU rules helps to bring the European public closer to the EU's instruments. This is all the more important in the case of cohesion policy, which is central to the process of European integration.

Brussels, 17 May 2006.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

---
WESLEY CAUDLE, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CAROLYN COL VIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

6: l 5-CV-00257-KI 

ORDER 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $5004.36 and costs for filing fees in the amount of $400 shall be awarded to Plaintiff 

pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree that attorney 

fees will be paid to Plaintiffs attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt 

which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees and costs, pursuant to the Treasury Offset 

Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (20 l 0). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiffs attorney and 

mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, 

OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at the address stated above . 

. s1iDATED this _I_ day of Mt11f'd,, , 2016. 

Garr ing 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 6:15-cv-00257-KI Document 22 Filed 03/15/16 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1700 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1700

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 21, 1998

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the headquarters building of the Department of Housing and 
Urban Development in Washington, District of Columbia, as the ``Robert 
                     C. Weaver Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT C. WEAVER FEDERAL BUILDING.

    In honor of the first Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 
the headquarters building of the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development located at 451 Seventh Street, SW., in Washington, District 
of Columbia, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert C. Weaver 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert C. Weaver Federal 
Building''.

            Passed the Senate July 31, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Garcia, Also Known as Jesus Garcia, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 516]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Griffin, J.), imposed October 19, 2009, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal does not foreclose his right to challenge the sentence ultimately imposed *(see People v Johnson,*92 AD3d 696 [2012]; *People v Banchs,*22 AD3d 595 [2005]). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J., Skelos, Leventhal, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Linda Nacey, Respondent, v James E. Nacey, II, Appellant.

— Casey, J.

In a prior decision, we concluded that the record was not sufficiently developed to enable Family Court to exercise its discretion with regard to respondent’s application for blood-grouping tests (116 AD2d 933). In particular, we were concerned about the absence of any proof as to respondent’s conduct relating to the child and the absence of any proof concerning the child or the potential impact on her well-being. Those deficiencies have now been remedied. Upon remittal, Family Court heard relevant testimony from the parties and from a psychologist, and the court adhered to its original decision denying respondent’s application.

We affirm. In its current state, the record is sufficiently developed to enable the court to exercise its discretion, and we see no abuse of discretion in Family Court’s denial of respondent’s application. Nor do we see any basis for us to substitute our judgment for that of Family Court in the exercise of that discretion.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Harvey, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 23 (a)

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of HEARx Ltd. on Form S-8 (filed September 13, 1994), Form S-8 (filed
July 19, 1996), Form S-3 (File No. 333-4303), Form S-3 (File No. 333-4639), Form
S-3 (File No. 333-11429) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-18753) of our report dated
March 25, 1997, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of the Registrant and its subsidiaries for the year ended
December 27, 1996, included in the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 27, 1996.


West Palm Beach, Florida                    BDO Seidman, LLP
March 27, 1997
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1566

AN ACT

To amend the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940

to protect the voting rights of military personnel, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Voting Rights

5 Act of 1997’’.
2

S 1566 ES

1 SEC. 2. GUARANTEE OF RESIDENCY.

2 Article VII of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief

3 Act of 1940 (50 U.S.C. App. 590 et seq.) is amended by

4 adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘SEC. 704. (a) For purposes of voting for an office

6 of the United States or of a State, a person who is absent

7 from a State in compliance with military or naval orders

8 shall not, solely by reason of that absence—

9 ‘‘(1) be deemed to have lost a residence or

10 domicile in that State;

11 ‘‘(2) be deemed to have acquired a residence or

12 domicile in any other State; or

13 ‘‘(3) be deemed to have become resident in or

14 a resident of any other State.

15 ‘‘(b) In this section, the term ‘State’ includes a terri16 tory or possession of the United States, a political subdivi17 sion of a State, territory, or possession, and the District

18 of Columbia.’’.

19 SEC. 3. STATE RESPONSIBILITY TO GUARANTEE MILITARY

20 VOTING RIGHTS.

21 (a) REGISTRATION AND BALLOTING.—Section 102 of

22 the Uniformed and Overseas Absentee Voting Act (42

23 U.S.C. 1973ff–1) is amended—

24 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL

25 OFFICES.—’’ before ‘‘Each State shall—’’; and

26 (2) by adding at the end the following:
3

S 1566 ES

1 ‘‘(b) ELECTIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL OFFICES.—

2 Each State shall—

3 ‘‘(1) permit absent uniformed services voters to

4 use absentee registration procedures and to vote by

5 absentee ballot in general, special, primary, and run6 off elections for State and local offices; and

7 ‘‘(2) accept and process, with respect to any

8 election described in paragraph (1), any otherwise

9 valid voter registration application from an absent

10 uniformed services voter if the application is received

11 by the appropriate State election official not less

12 than 30 days before the election.’’.

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading for

14 title I of such Act is amended by striking out ‘‘FOR

15 FEDERAL OFFICE’’.

Passed the Senate November 13, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1566

AN ACT

To amend the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act

personnel, and for other purposes.of 1940 to protect the voting rights of military
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range Management Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Comprehensive Publications
                    Research SummarySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Range Management Research People & Locations







Rob J Dunlap
                        Range Management Research

                        




                        
                        Range Technician
                        Phone: (575) 646-9401
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ben
Corey-Moran, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small
business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                           |  |                    
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date: August 16, 2010     
|By:                        |  | /s/ Ben Corey-Moran
|Ben Corey-Moran, President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lamonte Campbell, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 712]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered October 31, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range and Meadow Forage Management Research: Burns, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Burns, Oregon Range and Meadow Forage Management Research People & Locations







Maureen A Puffer

(Mo)
                        Range and Meadow Forage Management Research

                        




                        
                        BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone: (541) 573-8912
                        
                        
                        Fax: (541) 573-3042(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
(7 App. Div. 203)

#### WAGNER v. COLLIS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 29, 1896.)

Civil Service Laws—Labor on Public Works—Exempt Fireman.

An exempt fireman, who is detailed as a laborer on public works, is not entitled to the protection -of Laws 1892, c. 577, relating to veterans of the war.

Appeal from special term, New York county.

Application by Henry Wagner for writ of mandamus against Charles H. T. Collis, commissioner. From an order denying a motion for a peremptory writ, petitioner appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and BARRETT, PATTERSON, O’BRIEN, and INGRAHAM, JJ.

Louis J. Grant, for appellant.

Terence Farley, for respondent.

BARRETT, J.

It is not claimed that exempt firemen are entitled' to preference in employment upon public works, as are honorably, discharged soldiers and sailors. The claim is that, being in suehemployment, they can only be removed for cause shown, after a hearing had under chapter 577 of the Laws of 1892. But this act relates only to persons holding positions by appointment, receiving a salary from the city. It has been held that a day laborer does not come, within this provision. Meyers v. City of New York, 69 Hun, 291, 23 N. Y. Supp. 484. In the case at bar the petitioner was not even. a regular laborer. He was simply a detailed laborer. He was re*172moved because bis service as such detailed laborer was not required, and no one was appointed in Ms place.

The mandamus was properly refused, and' the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Form of Waiver executed by Senior Executive Officers


 Exhibit 10.3 
 FORM OF WAIVER 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in
the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the
regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. 
 I acknowledge that this regulation may
require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they
relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver
includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise
receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship. 
 A signature transmitted by facsimile will be deemed an original signature. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I,
[                            ], intending to be legally bound hereby, and for full
consideration, have executed this Waiver this 12th day of December, 2008. 
 
                                         
                                
 [                            ]