alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNIE REBECCA ELLIOTT 

DISTRICT CLERK

MAILING

301 Jackson Street 

Richmond, Texas 77469 

PHYSICAL 

1422 Eugene Heimann Circle, Room 10142 

Richmond, Texas 77469 

Telephone: (281) 341-4502 Fax: 281-341-4519

 http://www.fortbendcountygov.com 

 quick link – District Clerk

February 10, 2015 

To: The Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First Court of Appeals Supreme Judicial District (Civil Appeal) 

Trial Court No: 14-DCV-211809 From the 387th Judicial District Court Fort Bend County, 

Texas 

Judge Presiding: Brenda G Mullinix Court Reporter: Lauren Rainer

Appellant(s): 

Charles Mandeville 

VS 

Appellee(s): 

Deborah Michelle Crowley 

Attorney for Appellant(s) Attorney For Appellee(s) 

Charles Mandeville Vicki L Pinak

Pro - Se SBN: 16011357 

1323 Sunset Lane 

Guymon Ok 73942 

 The Pinak Law Firm Pllc 

12946 S Dairy Ashford Rd Suite 400 

Sugar Land TX 77478 

Telephone: Telephone: 281-240-2355 

Facsimile: Facsimile: 281-240-2354 

E-mail: E-mail: pinak@texadr.com 

Attorney for: Charles Mandeville, Appellant Attorney for: Deborah Michelle Crowley, Appellee 

 

Date of Judgment/ Appealable Order: 11/12/2014 Nature of Action: Divorce - With Children

Disposition of Case: Disposed Jury Trial: Yes 

 Motion for New Trial filed on: 12/24/2014 

Notice of Appeal Filed On: February 10, 2015

Signed on this the 10th day of February, 2015.

ANNIE REBECCA ELLIOTT 

FORT BEND COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK

301 JACKSON, RICHMOND, TEXAS 77469 

 

By: /s/ Petra Lozano 

Deputy District Clerk Petra Lozano 

Telephone: 281-341-4502 

Electronically Filed with the First Court of Appeals 

cc: Charles Mandeville, Pro-Se 

 Vicki L Pinak, Attorney at Law 

Lauren Rainer, Court Reporter 

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/10/2015 1:36:38 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elwood Shepard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: March 21, 2008By:/s/ Elwood ShepardElwood ShepardChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joan Katzeff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | August 14, 2007        
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Joan Katzeff       
|      |  | Joan Katzeff, President
(17 Misc. Rep. 414)

#### BOWE, County Treasurer, v. McNAB et al.

(Supreme Court, Trial Term, Albany County.

June, 1896.)

Taxation—Executors—Possession op Personalty.

Executors are not in possession of personalty of their testator, so as to render them taxable therefor (1 Rev. St. p. 389, § 5), where testator had conveyed all his personal property to trustees to manage during his life, and on his death to transfer and deliver it to persons entitled thereto under his will, as in such case the property is in the possession of the trustees.

Action by John Bo we, as treasurer of Albany county, against Peter D. McNab and others, as executors of the will of John Gumming, deceased, to recover a tax on personal property. Defendants’ testator, several years before his death, conveyed all his personal property to Charles B. Bobertson, of the city of Brooklyn, in trust, to care for and manage the same, and to transfer and deliver the , same, on testator’s death, to persons who, under Ms will, should be entitled thereto.

Mark Cohn, for plaintiff.

Rieck & Wachsman, for defendants.

EDWABDS, J.

The jurisdiction of the assessors to make the assessment in question depended upon the existence of two facts,-—• the residence of the defendants in the ward when the assessment was made, and their possession or control, as executors, of personal property of their testator. The concurrence of these facts was essential to make them “taxable inhabitants.” 1 Bev. St. p. 389, § 5; Laws 1850, c. 86, § 53. The latter of these jurisdictional facts dir not exist. Since the death of the testator, the legal title to the property has been vested in a trustee, residing in Kings county, who has had" possession and control. I am of opinion, therefore, that the assessment is void, and the defendants are entitled to judgment, with costs.

Ordered accordingly.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1272

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel ARCELLA.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 8, 1997

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

ARCELLA.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

7 289), and sections 12106 through 12108 of title 46, Unit8 ed States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue
2

•S 1272 IS

1 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse2 ment for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

3 ARCELLA, United States official number 1025983.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 158 (Thursday, August 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 46708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Environmental Health Sciences Council, September 13, 2021, 
11:00 a.m. to September 14, 2021, 04:45 p.m., National Institute of 
Environmental Health Science, Durham, NC 27709 which was published in 
the Federal Register on August 16, 2021, FR Doc 2021-17410, 86 FR 
45742.
    This notice is being amended to change the meeting date from 
September 13-14, 2021 to September 13, 2021. The start time for open 
session is also amended and will now start at 11:45 a.m. and adjourn at 
5:15 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

    Dated: August 16, 2021.
David Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-17819 Filed 8-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock Issues Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Newsletter
                    IACUC Executive SummariesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Livestock Issues Research People & Locations







Kyle  Vahlenkamp
                        Livestock Issues Research

                        




                        
                        BIOLCL AID (ANML)
                        Phone: (806) 746-5353
                        
                        
                        Fax: (806) 746-5028(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Thomas WINN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-15195

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 27, 2007.

Peter Warren Kenny, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, R. Fletcher Peacock, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Patricia D. Barksdale, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

James Thomas Winn appeals his convictions on two counts of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence,1 contending the statute of conviction, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), violates the Commerce Clause.

Winn faded to raise this issue in the district court, thus we review for plain error. *See United States v. Peters,*403 F.3d 1263, 1270-71 (11th Cir.2005) (stating when a defendant fails to raise a constitutional challenge in the district court, we review for plain error). “[W]e may not correct an error the defendant failed to raise in the district court unless there is: (1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) that affects substantial rights.” *Id.*(quotations omitted). Even if we hold these three prongs are satisfied, “we will exercise our discretion to rectify the error only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” *Id.*(quotations omitted).

We have expressly held that § 924(c) does not violate the Commerce Clause. *United States v. Ferreira,*275 F.3d 1020, 1028 (11th Cir.2001); *see also United States v. DePace,*120 F.3d 233, 235 n. 2 (11th Cir.1997). Thus, the district court did not err, much less plainly err, in convicting Winn under § 924(c). *See id.*To the extent Winn contends we should overrule these cases, this argument is without merit because only this Court sitting en banc or the Supreme Court may overrule a prior panel decision. *Walker v. S. Co. Servs., Inc.,*279 F.3d 1289, 1293 (11th Cir.2002).2 We affirm Winn’s convictions.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Winn does not contest his conviction for conspiracy to rob a federally insured bank, which did not involve 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

2

. To the extent Winn may have sought to challenge § 924(c) as unconstitutional as applied to him, he abandoned the issue by failing to offer any argument or analysis of it in his brief. *See Flanigans Enters., Inc. v. Fulton County,*242 F.3d 976, 987 n. 16 (11th Cir.2001) (holding when a defendant fails "to elaborate or provide any citation of authority in support,” he abandons the argument for appellate purposes); *Allison v. McGhan Med. Corp.,*184 F.3d 1300, 1317 n. 17 (11th Cir.*9621999) (stating issues "not clearly outlined in an appellant’s initial brief are deemed abandoned”).
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1800 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 224
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1800

                          [Report No. 105-619]

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 1998

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             July 14, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 85 Marconi Boulevard in Columbus, Ohio, as the ``Joseph P. Kinneary 
                      United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOSEPH P. KINNEARY UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 85 
Marconi Boulevard in Columbus, Ohio, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Joseph P. Kinneary United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Joseph P. Kinneary United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate June 2, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 224

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1800

                          [Report No. 105-619]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 85 Marconi Boulevard in Columbus, Ohio, as the ``Joseph P. Kinneary 
                      United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 14, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
-Exhibit 32-1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies Inc.,
Inc. on Form 10KSB for the Year ended 08/31/2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Gottfried, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10KSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: December  13,2007
Name  /s/ Sam Gottfried (CEO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
 the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to NoFire Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by NoFire
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.







Exhibit 32-2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies Inc.,
Inc. on Form 10KSB for the Year ended 08/31/2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Oolie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and


(2) The information contained in the Form 10KSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: December 13, 2007

Name  /s/ Sam Oolie (CFO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to NoFire Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by NoFire
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

JACK BLAIR FERGUS, Case. No. 3:14-cv-01563-ST

Plaintiff,

vs.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ORDER FOR EAJA FEES

ACTING COMMISSIONER of Social Security,

Defendant.

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28

USC § 2412, and Plaintiff’s EAJA petition, it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney’s fees of

$6185.54 shall be awarded to Plaintiff, unless there is an allowable offset under the Department

of the Treasury’s Offset Program. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 US 586 (2010). There are no costs 

or expenses.

If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under

the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees shall be made

payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Richard A. Sly, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these

amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. Any check for EAJA fees should be mailed to Plaintiff’s 

attorney as follows:

Richard A. Sly

Law Office of Evans & Evans

610 SW Broadway, Suite 405

Portland Oregon 97205

 DATED this 11th day of December, 2015.

s/ Janice M. Stewart

HON. JANICE M. STEWART

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

LOREN & VALERIE KRUESI, 

Plaintiffs,

v. Civil No.6:14-cv-01465-TC

LINN COUNTY, a municipal corporation; and

BRUCE DAVIS; DAVID SNIPPEN; & RICK

CAMPBELL, individuals in their individual 

capacities, 

Defendants.

_____________________________________________

JUDGMENT

This action is dismissed. 

Dated: October 6, 2015 

MARY L. MORAN, Clerk

by /s/ R. Henshaw 

 R. Henshaw, Deputy Clerk

JUDGMENT