alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rajesh DUTT and Lata Rashmin Dutt, Petitioners, v. EriC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-70113.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 21, 2011.

Anthony Santarelli, Esquire, Law Offices of Anthony Santarelli, Marina Del Rey, CA, for Petitioners.

*211Matt Crapo, OIL, Michelle Gorden Lat-our, Esquire, Assistant Director, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *211*See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rajesh Dutt and Lata Rashmin Dutt, natives and citizens of Fiji, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings. *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely where it was filed more than 90 days after the BIA’s final order of removal, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), and petitioners failed to demonstrate changed country conditions to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit for filing motions to reopen, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii); *cf. Malty v. Ashcroft,*381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir.2004). Therefore, petitioners’ due process rights were not violated. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error for a due process violation).

We do not consider the extra-record evidence submitted for the first time with petitioners’ opening brief because the court’s review is limited to the administrative record. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A).

Petitioners’ remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 10.99(g)(2)

PROMISSORY NOTE

$35,000

SPEAKLINK,
INC.
October 27, 2000

a.Statement of Loan

FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the Undersigned promises to pay to the order of CECS CORPORATION ("the Payee") at 111 Queen Anne Avenue North, Suite #501, Seattle, WA 98121, or at such other place
as the Payee may designate in writing to the Undersigned, the principal sum of Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($35,000) in lawful money of the United States of America.

b.Maturity; Payment

This
Note shall be repaid in full upon the maturity hereof, on or before December 27, 2000, unless required to be repaid at an earlier date in accordance with the provisions following.
Repayment shall include all then unpaid principal and any accrued but unpaid interest on this Note.

c.Application of Payments

Payments
made hereunder shall first be applied against payments of interest and then toward the reduction of principal.

d.Interest

Interest
shall accrue on this Note at the rate of 12 Percent per annum.

e.Prepayment

The
Undersigned shall, at any time, have the right to prepay, without penalty or premium, all or any portion of the loan evidenced by this Note.

f.Grace Period

The
Payee shall not exercise any right or remedy provided for in this Note because of any default of the Undersigned to pay the sums due hereunder, until after the expiration of a Fifteen
(15) day grace period from the Undersigned's receipt of any demand for payment. No more than Three (3) grace periods shall be given during the term of this Note.

g.Action to Enforce

---

h.No Waiver, etc.

No
delay or failure on the part of the Payee on this Note to exercise any power or right given hereunder shall operate as waiver thereof, and no right or remedy of the Payee shall be deemed abridged
or modified by any course of conduct.

j.State Law

This
Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the State of Washington applicable to agreements made and to be performed in Washington.

k.No Oral Change

This
Note cannot be changed orally.

|UNDERSIGNED:             |  |                                    |  |       
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------- |  | ------
|BORROWER: SPEAKLINK INC. |  |                                    |  |       
|BY:                      |  | /s/ Adam GreenhalghAdam Greenhalgh |  | DATED:

---

QuickLinks
Case 3:14-cv-02012-CL Document 11-1 Filed 08/17/15 Page 1 of 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

LESLIE C. CHUIRAZZI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

3: 14-cv-02012-CL 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION TO DISMISS HER CLAIM 

Comes now this Court and having reviewed Plaintiff's Motion and the Declaration 

of Richard F. McGinty, finding Plaintiff's Motion is not opposed, further finds that 

Plaintiff's Motion is well taken and grants Plaintiff's Motion to Dissmiss Her Claim. 

'} y-: Dated the 1/ day of August 2015 . 

. IT IS SO ORDERED. 

lkf1ted States Judge 

Ha~i~rv-~;e 

Page -1- ORDER 

Case 3:14-cv-02012-CL Document 13 Filed 08/24/15 Page 1 of 1
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1835

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-(6-methoxy-4-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-

yl)-1-[2-(2-chloroethoxy)-phenylsulfonyl]-urea.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24, 1998

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-(6-methoxy-4-methyl1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-1-[2-(2-chloroethoxy)-phenylsulfonyl]-urea.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 3-(6-METHOXY-4-METHYL-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2-YL)-1-

4 [2-(2-CHLOROETHOXY)-PHENYLSULFONYL]-

5 UREA.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

9 new heading:
2

•S 1835 IS

‘‘ 9902.38.09 3-(6-methoxy-4-methyl-1,3,5-

triazin-2-yl)-1-[2-(2-

chloroethoxy)-phenylsulfonyl]-

urea (CAS No. 82097–50–5)

(provided for in subheading

3808.30.15) ........................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/02 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to articles entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Enki Properties, N. V., Appellant, v Loft Board of the City of New York, Respondent.

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, J.), entered on October 17, 1985, unanimously vacated as one made in excess of jurisdiction, and this court having considered all issues in this proceeding as if the matter had been properly transferred in the first instance, the determination of the respondent is unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lynch, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ. *[See,*128 Misc 2d 485.]
EXHIBIT 23(b)




                   (REED W. FERRILL & ASSOCIATES LETTERHEAD)

                                           February 7, 1998


Columbus Energy Corp.
1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 2400
Denver, Colorado 80264


     Reed W. Ferrill & Associates,  Inc. consents to the use of its name and its
reports dated  February 7, 1998  entitled  "Columbus  Energy Corp.,  Reserve and
Revenue Forecast as of November 30, 1997, Constant Prices and Costs" in whole or
in part, by Columbus  Energy Corp.  (Columbus) in Columbus'  Form 10-K Report to
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission for the fiscal year ended November 30,
1997.



                                             for and on behalf of
                                             Reed W. Ferrill & Associates, Inc.

                                             \s\ Reed W. Ferrill
                                                 ------------------------
                                                 Reed W. Ferrill
                                                 President


RWF/mlb
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9057-9]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 

Filed August 9, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through August 16, 2021 10 a.m. EST 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

                    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20210117, Draft, NOAA, CA,*                     Amendment 6 to the Fishery Management Plan for West Coast Highly Migratory Species Fisheries: Authorization of Deep-set Buoy Gear,  Comment Period Ends: 10/04/2021, Contact: Amber Rhodes 562-477-8342.                

*EIS No. 20210118, Draft Supplement, NHTSA, REG,*                     Model Year 2024-2026 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards,  Comment Period Ends: 10/04/2021, Contact: Vinay Nagabhushana 202-366-1452.                

*EIS No. 20210119, Final, AZDOT, AZ,*                     North-South Corridor Study Tier 1,  Contact: Katie Rodriguez 480-521-8887.                

Under 23 U.S.C. 139(n)(2), AZDOT has issued a single document that consists of a final environmental impact statement and record of decision. Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under NEPA does not apply to this action.

*EIS No. 20210120, Final, BLM, NV,*                     Relief Canyon Mine Project,  Review Period Ends: 09/20/2021, Contact: Jeanette Black 775-623-1500.                

*EIS No. 20210121, Final, BOEM, MA,*                     South Fork Wind Farm and South Fork Export Cable Project,  Review Period Ends: 09/20/2021, Contact: Michelle Morin 703-787-1722.                

Dated: August 16, 2021.

Candi Schaedle,

Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2021-17868 Filed 8-19-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of January 31, 2008, and for the period then ended.



|                     |  |                                                                          
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Neil D. Wilkin, Jr.                                                  
|                     |  | Neil D. Wilkin, Jr.                                                      
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer
03-14-00215-CR

A PPELLANT ’ S M OTION TO F ILE A MENDED B RIEF

To the Honorable Court:
COMES NOW counsel for Jonathan Porterie, the Defendant in the above
styled and numbered cause, and requests leave to file an amended. In support of this
motion, Defendant shows the following.

I.
The brief in this case was transmitted to the Court on December 22, 2014, with
a motion for leave to file a late brief and filed by the Court on December 29, 2014.

II.
On January 8, 2015, counsel conferred with Brian Erskine, counsel for the
State. Mr. Erskine informed counsel that he believed an important issue had not been
raised in Appellant’s brief. Upon review, counsel believes that Mr. Erskine was
correct and appreciates being informed of this important matter. ACCEPTED 03-14-00215-CR 3723796 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/11/2015 5:43:16 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKIII.
Counsel has added one issue to the brief, the issue raised by Mr. Erskine. The
substantive amendment effects only the conviction in appellate cause 03-14-00214-
CR, trial court cause CR-13-0920. Amendments to the brief concern only the
addition of the new issue. Counsel has not edited, corrected, or modified any other
substantive section. Counsel has not even corrected any typographical errors in those

sections.
The modifications include the addition of a new issue (new Issue I), a
renumbering of the remaining issues, and changes to the table of contents, index of

authorities, and other ministerial sections of the brief.

P RAYER
Therefore, Appellant prays that the Court grant this motion and file the
amended brief in this case. Counsel requests that the originally filed brief be struck.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ James Gerard McDermott, II James Gerard McDermott, II, Attorney T HOMPSON S ALINAS R ICKERS & M C D ERMOTT , LLP 8140 N. Mopac, Westpark 4, Suite 250 Austin TX 78759 512.201.4099 512.298.1129 (fax) james@centraltexaslawyers.com

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on January 11, 2014, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served by electronic service and by email on:

Brian Clarke Erskine State Bar No. 24074182 Assistant Hays County District Attorney 712 South Stagecoach Trail, Suite 2057 San Marcos TX 78666

. /s/ James Gerard McDermott, II James Gerard McDermott, II, Attorney

3
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

Wehave issued our report dated August 15, 2005 accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements included in the Annual Report of Apogee Technology, Inc.and Subsidiary on Form 10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.We consent to the use of the aforementioned report, which is incorporated byreference in the Registration Statements of Apogee Technology, Inc. andSubsidiary on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-106316, 333-90558 and 333-61486).
| /s/ MILLER WACHMAN  LLP |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Boston, Massachusetts   |   |
| August 19, 2005         |   |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

MORGAN ELIZABETH GODVIN, 

Defendant. 

 3:14-CR-00267-06-BR

 

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 

AD PROSEQUENDUM

To: Sheriff, Multnomah County: 

Pursuant to Chapter 153, Title 28, United States Code, you are directed to deliver the body 

of above named defendant MORGAN ELIZABETH GODVIN, Multnomah County 

SWIS #770556, a prisoner in your custody currently being housed at MCIJ, to the United States 

Marshal for the District of Oregon, or his duly authorized Deputy, who is hereby directed to 

produce said prisoner before this Court on Thursday, August 7, 2014, at 1:30 p.m., for the 

purpose of arraignment, trial and any further proceedings. It is further ordered that the United 

States Marshal, or his duly authorized Deputy, shall re-deliver said prisoner to your facility at the 

conclusion of said proceedings, and is authorized to incur the necessary expenses connected 

therewith, as provided by law. 

Dated this ______ day of July 2014. 

____________________________________ 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Presented by: 

S. AMANDA MARSHALL, OSB #95347 

United States Attorney 

s/ Leah K. Bolstad 

LEAH K. BOLSTAD, OSB #05203 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 3:14-cr-00267-HZ Document 35-1 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 1
HA Agenda




Rayonier

2009 Performance Share Award Program

The number of shares to which a participant could become entitled under the 2009 Performance Share Award Program (the "Program") can range from 30% to a maximum of 175% of the Target Award depending on Rayonier's total shareholder return ("TSR") performance for the three-year Performance Period of January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2011, as compared to the TSR performance of the designated peer group companies for the same period.  There will be no payout if results fall below the 30th percentile performance threshold.






	TSR is defined as stock price appreciation plus the reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis. For purposes of performance measurement, TSR shall be the final reported figure as may be adjusted by the Committee for unusual items to avoid distortion in the operation of the Program.


	TSR over the 3-year period will be calculated by measuring the value of a hypothetical $100 investment in Rayonier shares as compared to an equal investment in each of the peer group companies. 


	TSR calculations of stock price appreciation will be the average of the closing prices of Rayonier common shares and that of each of the peer group companies for the 20 trading days preceding the starting and ending dates of the Performance Period.  





The final number of shares in an Award will be determined as follows:

	The TSR performance of Rayonier and the peer group companies will be calculated and Rayonier's relative performance, on a percentile basis, is determined.
	The payout percentage of Target Award based on Rayonier's percentile TSR performance against the peer group companies will be calculated per the following table:



	
Percentile Rank
	
Award (Expressed As Percent of Target Award)

	
80th and Above
	
175%

	
61st -79th
	
100%, plus 3.75% for each incremental percentile position over the 60th percentile

	
60th
	
100%

	
31st - 59th
	
30%, plus 2.33% for each incremental percentile position over the 30th percentile

	
30th
	
30%

	
Below 30th
	
0%












	The payout percentage may not exceed 150% of target awards if Rayonier's TSR for the Performance Period is negative.


	Payment, if any, is to be made in Rayonier Common Shares, and may be offset, to the extent allowed under applicable regulations, by the number of shares equal in value to the amount needed to cover associated tax liabilities.


	Payment will be made as soon as practicable following the completion of the Performance Period. 


	Target awards will be prorated in cases of retirement, death, or disability in accordance with Plan provisions. 







 

 

2009

Performance Share Award Program

(January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2011)



Peer Group Companies



Abitibi/Bowater



Buckeye Technologies



Cousins Properties



Deltic Timber



Forestar



International Paper



Mead-Westvaco



Neenah Paper



Potlatch Corporation



Plum Creek 



Sappi



St. Joe Company



Tembec



TimberWest



Weyerhaeuser



 

 

 

 

Administration

December 2008
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Soil Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Carl P. Ranno, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno
----------------------------------
Carl P. Ranno,
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer
February 22, 2010
Exhibit 10.11A
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
CHS INC.
NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR RETIREMENT PLAN
  Effective for each Director who was serving as an Eligible Director as of August 31, 2011, the last
sentence in Section 5 of the Plan shall be amended to read as follows:
  Effective September 1, 2011, participation in the Plan is frozen and further benefit accruals under
the Plan shall be permanently discontinued. Director services rendered on or after September 1,
2011 ( i.e ., for the Companys 2012 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter) shall be
disregarded for purposes of determining an Eligible Directors retirement benefit under the Plan.
  /s/  Michael ToelleMichael ToelleChairman