47054 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 160 / Monday, August 23, 2021 / Notices 

1See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Intent To Rescind 

Review, in Part; 2018–2019 86 FR 10923 (February 

23, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2The petitioners in this review are United States 

Steel Corporation, AK Steel Corporation, 

ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, Steel 

Dynamics, Inc. See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from Australia: Petitioners’ Case 

Brief,’’ dated March 25, 2021; see also BlueScope’s 

Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of BlueScope Steel Ltd: Certain 

Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Australia,’’ dated 

March 25, 2021; the Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from Australia: Petitioners’ 

Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated April 6, 2021; and 

BlueScope’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief of BlueScope 

Steel Ltd: Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from 

Australia,’’ dated April 6, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from Australia: Extension of Deadline 

for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated May 18, 

2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Hot Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from Australia: Decision Memorandum for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the 

Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the 

United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the 

Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 

2016) (Order). 

(10) calendar days following publication 

of this notice. These petitions are 

received pursuant to section 251 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Please follow the requirements set 

forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 

315.8 for procedures to request a public 

hearing. The Catalog of Federal 

Domestic Assistance official number 

and title for the program under which 

these petitions are submitted is 11.313, 

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. 

Bryan Borlik, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2021–18046 Filed 8–20–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–602–809] 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From Australia: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Rescission of 

Review, in Part; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that sales of 

certain hot-rolled steel flat products 

(hot-rolled steel) from Australia were 

made at less than normal value during 

the period of review (POR), October 1, 

2018, through September 30, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable August 23, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Allison Hollander, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2805. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 23, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

2018–2019 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on hot-rolled 

steel from Australia in the Federal 

Register.1 This review covers one 

producer/exporter of subject 

merchandise, the collapsed entity, 

BlueScope Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd., 

BlueScope Steel Ltd., and BlueScope 

Steel Distribution Pty Ltd. (collectively, 

BlueScope). We invited interested 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Results and received case and rebuttal 

briefs.2 On May 18, 2021, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the final 

results of review by 60 days to no later 

than August 20, 2021.3 A complete 

summary of the events that occurred 

since publication of the Preliminary 

Results is found in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.4 Commerce 

conducted this review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this Order 5

are hot-rolled steel. A full description of 

the scope of the Order is contained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties 

in this review are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues that parties raised, and 

to which we responded in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, follows as 

an appendix to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is made available to the 

public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is available at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Rescission of Review in Part 

As stated in the Preliminary Results, 

Commerce inadvertently included as 

subject to the review, a U.S. company, 

i.e., AJU Steel USA Inc., for which a 

review should not have been initiated. 

We received no comments from 

interested parties with respect to 

Commerce’s intent to rescind the review 

with respect to AJU Steel USA Inc. 

Therefore, we are rescinding this 

administrative review, in part, with 

respect to AJU Steel USA Inc. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, and for the reasons explained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

we made certain changes for these final 

results of review. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margin 

exists for the period October 1, 2018, 

through September 30, 2019: 

Exporter/producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

BlueScope Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd, BlueScope Steel Ltd., and BlueScope Steel Distribution Pty Ltd ............................................ 9.94 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

final results to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after public 

announcement of the final results, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 160 / Monday, August 23, 2021 / Notices 47055 

6 In these final results, Commerce applied the 

assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

7See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

8See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the 

Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the 

United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the 

Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 

2016). 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

For BlueScope, we calculated 

importer-specific assessment rates on 

the basis of the ratio of the total amount 

of dumping calculated for each 

importer’s examined sales and the total 

entered value of those same sales in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).6

Where an importer-specific assessment 

rate is zero or de minimis, the entries by 

that importer will be liquidated without 

regard to antidumping duties. For 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by BlueScope for 

which it did not know the merchandise 

was destined for the United States, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.7

For any suspended entries of hotrolled steel from AJU Steel USA Inc., we 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties at the rate equal to the cash 

deposit rate of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse for 

consumption. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of these final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice for all shipments of hotrolled steel from Australia entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for BlueScope will be equal 

to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

the review; (2) for merchandise exported 

by producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the original investigation but the 

producer has been covered in a prior 

completed segment of this proceeding, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established in the completed 

segment for the most recent period for 

the producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will continue to be 29.58 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.8 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221. 

Dated: August 17, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes to the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Reimbursement of 

Antidumping Duties 

Comment 2: Calculation of Constructed 

Export Price Profit 

Comment 3: Non-Prime Product Costs 

Comment 4: Home-Market Price 

Adjustments 

Comment 5: Calculation of Further 

Manufacturing Expenses 

Comment 6: Calculation of Home-Market 

Movement Expenses 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–18088 Filed 8–20–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–909, A–821–826, A–823–819] 

Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel 

Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 

From the Republic of Korea, the 

Russian Federation, and Ukraine: 

Antidumping Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC), 

Commerce is issuing antidumping duty 

orders on seamless carbon and alloy 

steel standard, line, and pressure pipe 

(seamless pipe) from the Republic of 

Korea (Korea), the Russian Federation 

(Russia), and Ukraine. 

DATES: Applicable August 23, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joshua DeMoss (Korea), Mark Hoadley 

(Russia), or Lilit Astvatsatrian (Ukraine) 

AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3362, (202) 482–3148, or 

(202) 482–6412, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES