alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE No. 3:15-cv-00960-SB

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

PIH BEAVERTON LLC, ORDER

Defendant. 

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings & Recommendation (#27) on May 3,

2016, in which she recommends the Court deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and

deny Defendant's motion for summary judgment. Both parties have timely filed objections to the

Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings &

Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the

1 - ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00960-SB Document 34 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 2
Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th

Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

I have carefully considered the parties' objections and conclude there is no basis to

modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the

record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation [27],

and therefore, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [14] and Defendant's motion for

summary judgment [18] are denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2016. 

 

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00960-SB Document 34 Filed 06/24/16 Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0074 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0074

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Institute for Gender Equality (COM(2005)0081 - C6-0083/2005 - 2005/0017(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 291 E , 30/11/2006 P. 0091 - 0104 *

P6_TA(2006)0074

European Institute for Gender Equality ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Institute for Gender Equality (COM(2005)0081 — C6-0083/2005 — 2005/0017(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2005)0081) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 13(2) and 141(3) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0083/2005),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal basis,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A6-0043/2006),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Specifies that the appropriations indicated in the legislative proposal are purely for guidance until agreement is reached on the financial perspective for the period 2007 and the following years;

3. Calls on the Commission to confirm, once the next financial perspective has been adopted, the amounts indicated in the proposal for a regulation or, should the case arise, to submit the adjusted amounts for approval by the European Parliament and the Council, thereby ensuring their compatibility with the ceiling;

4. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in the OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,865
<SECURITIES>                                 1,159,995
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,189,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,162,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,189,195
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,918
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,918
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,918
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

LARRY DALE JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, 

Defendant. 

BROWN, Judge. 

3:15-CV-00581-AC 

ORDER 

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and 

Recommendation (#91) on March 20, 2017, in which he recommends 

the Court dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (#90) sua 

sponte with leave to amend to "allege the facts giving rise to 

his claim to compel the [Bureau of Prisons] to accept or reject 

his IACA [Inmate Accident Compensation Act, 18 U.S.C. § 4126] 

1 - ORDER 
claim" as set out in the Findings and Recommendation. 

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and 

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its 

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 

561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. 

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de nova, the Court does not 

find any error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 

(#90). The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file a Third Amended 

Complaint no later than May 17, 2017, only to allege the facts 

that give rise to his claim to compel the Bureau of Prisons to 

accept or to reject Plaintiff's IACA claim as set out in the 

Findings and Recommendation. 

The Court advises Plaintiff that the Magistrate Judge will 

review Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint and will recommend sua 

sponte dismissal of the Third Amended Complaint if it fails to 

comply with the March 20, 2017, Findings and Recommendation or 

this Court's Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a Third Amended 

Complaint by May 17, 2017, or if Plaintiff's Third Amended 

Complaint does not comply with the Findings and Recommendation or 

this Court's Order, the Court will dismiss this matter with 

2 - ORDER 
prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 17th day of April, 2017. 

ANNA J. BROWN 

United States District Judge 

3 - ORDER
No. 99-20910

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20910

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VINCENT JOSEPH SHELVIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CR-120-1

--------------------

June 29, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Vincent Joseph Shelvin appeals his sentence for possession

with intent to distribute crack cocaine. He argues that the

district court had discretion to consider his collateral

challenge under to a state conviction used to calculate his

criminal history under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2 and United States v.

Canales, 960 F.2d 1111, 1115 (5th Cir. 1992). Canales has been 

superseded by the 1993 amendments to the commentary of § 4A1.2

and by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Custis v. United States, 511

U.S. 485, 487 (1994). See United States v. Toliver, No. 94-40978
No. 99-20910

-2-

 

** Unpublished opinions issued before January 1, 1996, have

precedential value. 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.3.

(5th Cir. Mar. 17, 1995).** Under the new language of the

commentary, Shelvin may collaterally attack his prior conviction

only if that right is otherwise recognized in law. § 4A1.2,

comment. (n.6). Shelvin has failed to provide any authority for

a collateral attack on his sentence.

Moreover, even if the district court did have discretion

under Canales to consider the collateral attack, the court chose

not to exercise its discretion in Shelvin’s case. The court

refused to rule on the validity of a state conviction under state

law until after the state courts had had an opportunity to

address the issue. Shelvin cannot show an abuse of discretion in

that decision. Shelvin’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 8, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133594 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133594 

 COA: 271459 

Lapeer CC: 06-008723-AR 

71-A DC: 05-2703-SD 

MARK RYAN NICKERSON, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. As stated in the 

Staff Comment to the 2005 Amendment of MCR 6.610, the Court has declined to add a 

new MCR 6.610(F) providing for discovery in district court. 

p0605 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 8, 2007 

 Clerk
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1588

To exclude the social security trust funds, the Federal military retiree trust

fund, the highway trust funds, the medicare trust fund, the civil service

retirement trust fund, the unemployment trust fund, and the airports

trust fund from the annual Federal budget baseline for all purposes

including budget enforcement.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 29, 1998

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, as modified by

the order of April 11, 1986, to the Committees on the Budget, and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one committee reports, the

other committee have thirty days to report or be discharged.

A BILL

To exclude the social security trust funds, the Federal military retiree trust fund, the highway trust funds, the

medicare trust fund, the civil service retirement trust

fund, the unemployment trust fund, and the airports

trust fund from the annual Federal budget baseline for

all purposes including budget enforcement.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deficit Integrity Act’’.
2

•S 1588 IS

1 SEC. 2. TRUST FUND PROTECTION.

2 The receipts and disbursements of the social security

3 trust funds, the Federal military retiree trust fund, the

4 highway trust funds, the medicare trust fund, the civil

5 service retirement trust fund, the unemployment trust

6 fund, the airports trust fund, and any other Federal trust

7 fund included in the gross Federal debt shall not be—

8 (1) included in the Federal budget baseline for

9 any fiscal year; and

10 (2) counted as new budget authority, outlays,

11 receipts, or deficit or surplus for purposes of—

12 (A) offsetting any tax decrease; and

13 (B) offsetting any spending increase.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Houma, Louisiana
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Sandra J Roberts

(Sandy)
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Office Automation Assistant
                        Phone: (985) 868-3338
                         ext. 194
                        
                        Fax: (985) 868-3933(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paulino Carmona, Appellant.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sam KraynekSam Kraynek, Chief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2011
Order filed, April 19, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-13-00250-CV

____________

BETTYE GREER DANDRIDGE, Appellant

V.

JAMES DANDRIDGE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-33584

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 5, 2013. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Benjamin Alva, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1778 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1778

        To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphonic acid, (1-
               hydroxyethylidene) bis-, tetrasodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 1998

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphonic acid, (1-
               hydroxyethylidene)bis-, tetrasodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHONIC ACID, (1-HYDROXYETHYLIDENE)BIS-, TETRASODIUM 
              SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

         ``    9902.31.09     Phosphonic acid,                                                                  
                               (1-                                                                              
                               hydroxyethyliden                                                                 
                               e)bis-,                                                                          
                               tetrasodium salt                                                                 
                               (CAS No. 2794-83-                                                                
                               0) (provided for                                                                 
                               in subheading                                                                    
                               2931.00.90).....  Free        No change        No change       On or before      
                                                                                               12/31/2001       
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research: Aberdeen, ID
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Aberdeen, Idaho Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research People & Locations







Weidong  Zhao
                        Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (208) 510-6738
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov