alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:15-cv-00338-SI Document 11 Filed 04/29/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:15-cv-00338-SI Document 11 Filed 04/29/15 Page 2 of 2
#### Maria K. Phelps, Appellant, *v.*Thomas McCann et al., Respondents.

(Submitted October 7, 1890;

decided October 21, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made February 21, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict.

*Wm. Witherstine*for appellant.

*L. B. Pike*for respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Sustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory People & Locations







Rembert B Shaw
                        Sustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (301) 504-5078
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Third Amendment to the Oneida Nation and the State of Wisconsin Gaming Compact of 1991 providing for Class III gaming between the Oneida Nation (Tribe) and the State of Wisconsin (State).

# DATES:

The compact takes effect on August 20, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240,                         *paula.hart@bia.gov,*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of                           ( print page 46867)                        engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment expands the types of authorized games to include events wagering with geofencing, adds the Nation's minimum internal control standards for sports betting, including rules governing events wagering, and replaces any references to the Oneida Indians of Wisconsin with Oneida Nation. The Amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2021-17858 Filed 8-19-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
#### In re COHEN’S WILL.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

In the matter of the probate of -the last will and testament of Joseph Cohen, deceased.

No opinion. Decree of surrogate affirmed, with costs, to be paid by appellant. All; concur.
(14 Misc. Rep. 425.)

#### PERKINS v. HEERT et al.

(Superior Court of New York City,

Special Term.

November, 1895.)

-Costs—Bxtba Allowance.

Under Code Civ. Proe. § 3253, providing for an extra allowance, in the discretion of the court, in ■ difficult and extraordinary cases, of a sum not to exceed 5 per cent, of the amount recovered or the value of the subject-matter in dispute, an extra allowance of §100 will be granted in an action to restrain the use of a trade-mark, and for an accounting of profits of defendant’s use of the same, where the amount recovered was §75, and ■±he value of the trade-mark §100,000.

Action by George W. Perkins against Henry H. Heert and others. Plaintiff moves for an extra allowance.

Granted.

August G. Nanz, for the motion.

William H. Klinker, opposed.

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This is a motion for an extra allowance under section 3253 of the Code, on the ground that the case was a difficult and extraordinary one. The action was to restrain defendants from using a certain trade-mark, and for an accounting and the payment of profits arising from defendants’ use of such trade-mark. The trial resulted in plaintiff’s favor, and judgment was rendered restraining defendants from using such trade-mark, and granting an accounting. The referee appointed to take such accounting found *435the sum due from defendants to be $75. The plaintiff claims an extra allowance, based, not on the amount recovered, but on the value of the subject-matter involved,—i. e. the trade-mark,—and he presents an affidavit putting its value at $100,000. But, as the Code prohibits an extra allowance of over $2,000 (section 3254) in such a case, he limits his claim to that amount. It is true that a valuable trade-mark may, for the purposes of computing the allowance, additional to costs, in an action for its infringement, be regarded like an easement, and the allowance is to be computed, not on the mere amount of damages recovered, but on the value of the trade-mark. See Munro v. Smith, 6 N. Y. Supp. 426. But the allowance in addition to costs, under section 3253 of the Code, should be what the court may deem a reasonable and moderate counsel fee in the cause, within the limits prescribed by the Code. See Sheldon v. Allerton, 2 Sandf. 630. It seems to me, from an examination of the papers before me on this motion, that the extra allowance could not exceed the sum of $100, which is accordingly granted.

Ordered accordingly.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed; Vacated and Remanded; and

Memorandum Opinion filed July 30 , 2019 .

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00357- CV

WINDHAVEN INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC, Appellant V. CAPITOL CHEVROLET, I NC. , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C-1- CV
- 18 -007593

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 14, 2018. On July 17, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand for a new trial

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1 and 43.2. The motion is granted.2

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed, the trial court’s judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for a new trial. PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
Amended and Restated Statement of Stock Ownership Policy



 Exhibit 4.1 
 AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD. 
 (“Corporation”) 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 STATEMENT OF STOCK
OWNERSHIP POLICY 
 December 12, 2008 
 (“Stock Ownership Policy”) 
 Pursuant to Sections 48 and 59 of the Corporation’s Bye-Laws, which allow the Board of Directors of the
Corporation (“Board”) to issue shares on such terms and conditions as it may determine and set restrictions on the transfer of such shares respectively, the Board has adopted this amended and restated Stock Ownership Policy setting the
following limitation on share ownership: 
 The number of shares of common stock of the Corporation that may be beneficially owned (as defined
in Rules 16a-1 and 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) by any shareholder shall be limited to 20,000 shares. 
 All
interpretations of this Stock Ownership Policy shall be made by the Board and shall be conclusive. This Stock Ownership Policy may be amended at any time by a resolution of the Board without approval of the Corporation’s stockholders. The Stock
Ownership Policy may also be amended at any time by an amendment to the Bye-Laws of the Corporation, including amendment of the Bye-Laws by the Board without approval of the Corporation’s stockholders.
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20994 Conference Calendar

__________________ JESUS HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus ROBERT LOSACK, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-3358
- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * This is an appeal from the district court's dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) of appellant's civil rights complaint. He contends that he alleged more than mere conclusional allegations in support of his retaliation claim and that the district court thus erred by dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. See Hernandez v. Losack , No. CA-H-95-3358 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 1995). Hernandez is WARNED that the filing of frivolous appeals in the future will result in the imposition of sanctions.No. 95-20994 -2- AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 160 (Monday, August 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 47150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ODVA, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 12, 2021, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ODVA, Inc. (``ODVA'') has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Radiometric 
Services & Instruments LLC, Frederick, MD; Ningbo AirTAC Automation 
Industrial Co., Ltd., Ningbo City, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Amphenol 
Canada Corp., Toronto, CANADA; Rheonik Messtechnik GmbH, Odelzhausen, 
GERMANY; Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S 
REPUBLIC OF CHINA; and JFcontrol Co., Ltd., Suwon-si, SOUTH KOREA, have 
been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, RFID, Inc., Dothan, AL, has withdrawn as a party to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 
15, 1996 (61 FR 6039).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 6, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 20, 2021 (86 FR 20522).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-18005 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Geneva, New York
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Geneva, New York People & Locations







Veronica  Leisenring
                        Geneva, New York

                        




                        
                        Financial Technician
                        Phone: (315) 787-2388
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>




                                   EXHIBIT 99


                              STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                 AS REQUIRED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of TB Wood's Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge.

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.



May 2, 2003 /s/ Michael L. Hurt       President (Principal Executive Officer)
            -------------------
            Michael L. Hurt


May 2, 2003 /s/ Thomas F. Tatarczuch  Vice President Finance (Principal
            ------------------------                         Financial Officer)
            Thomas F. Tatarczuch


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

November 18, 2014

Wally Hatch

District Attorney

225 Broadway, Suite 1

Plainview, TX 79072-8050

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Kregg Hukill

LAW OFFICE OF KREGG HUKILL, P.C.

P. O. Box 1929

Plainview, TX 79073

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-14-00159-CR, 07-14-00160-CR

Trial Court Case Number: A16909-0608, A16910-0608

Style: Oscar Ivan Garcia v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The Court this day issued an opinion and judgment in the captioned cause. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 48.

In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on

file with this Court, if any

, will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case

or at an earlier date if ordered by the Court.

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable Edward Lee Self (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Carla Cannon (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Oscar Ivan Garcia
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6434

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DARRON GOODS, a/k/a Moo Man , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00309

- RDB

- 9 ; 1:20

- cv - 03118

- RDB )

Submitted : November 23, 2021 Decided: November 29, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Darron Goods , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Darron Goods se eks to appeal the district court’ s order s denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as successive and unauthorized , and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record confirms that the district court properly determined that Goods’ § 2255 motion was successive and unauthorize d and therefore the court lacked jurisdiction
over it. * See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A), 2255(h); United States v. McRae , 793 F.3d 392,
397

- 400 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders

. We dispense with oral argument because t he facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRM ED

* Because we agree with the district court that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Goods’ successive, unauthorized motion, we do not address the district court’s alternative ruling that the motion was untimely and lacking in merit. To the extent that Good s wishes to obtain authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255 motion, he may file such a motion directly in this c ourt pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2255.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1)   | The                Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the                "Form                10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The                information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                   |                               |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Date:                March 30, 2007 |                                        | /s/                Robert A. Crist |
|                                | Name:                Robert A. Crist   |
|                                | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of January 31, 2010, and for the period then ended.



|                     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2010 |  | /s/ Tracy G. Smith                               
|                     |  | Tracy G. Smith                                   
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer