alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research People & Locations







Lilia  Walther
                        Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Laboratory Technical
                        Phone: (515) 337-7393
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of January 31, 2005, and for the period then ended.



|                     |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Tracy G. Smith                        
|                     |  | Tracy G. Smith                            
|                     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS EX PARTE § § § NO. WR-83,100-01 § WR-83,100-02 LUIS ANGEL MONDRAGON § WR-83,100-03

APPLICANT’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND DISMISS APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT

TO ART. 11.07, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: NOW COMES the Applicant, LUIS ANGEL MONDRAGON, and files this Motion to Withdraw and Dismiss Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Art. 11.07, Tex Code Crim. Proc., and would show the following: I. Applicant hereby moves to withdraw and dismiss his Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. II. Applicant filed a motion in the trial court prior to his writ application being forwarded to this Court asking that his Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed. That motion was granted on March 30, 2015. A copy of the order of the trial court is attached as Exhibit A. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Applicant prays that this motion be granted.
Applicant’s Motion to Withdraw and Dismiss Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Art. 11.07, Tex. Code Crim. Proc. - Page 1 

### WR-83,100-02 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 4/13/2015 9:36:14 AM Accepted 4/13/2015 9:55:58 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK

### Respectf ully subm itted, /s/ Robert N. Udashen ROBERT N. UDASHEN, P.C. Bar Card No. 20369600 SORRELS, UDASHEN & ANTON 2311 Cedar Springs Road Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75201 214-468-8100 214-468-8104 (f

ax) Attorney f or Applicant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this 13th day of Apr i l , 2 0 15, a true and correct copy of Applicant’s Motion to W ithdraw Application f

or Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Art. 11.07, Tex. Code Crim

. Proc. was delivere d t o t

he Dallas County District Attorney ’s Of f ice, Appellate Section, Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 N. Riverf ront Blvd., L.B. 19, Dallas, Texas 75207. /s/ Robert N. Udashen ROBERT N. UDASHEN, P.C.

A pp licant ’s M otiont o With dra w andDi smi ss App lica ti on for W ritof Hab eas C orpu s Pu rsua ntt o Art. 11 .0 7, Tex . C ode C rim. Proc. - Pa ge 2WRIT NOS. W01-59633-L(A), W01-49257-L(A), W03-49258-L(A) INDICTMENT NOS. FOi-59633-L, F03-49257-L, F03-49258-L STATE OF TEXAS 

## vs. LUIS ANGEL MONDRAGON 

### § 

### § § § 

### § IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER FIVE DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER On this day came on to be considered the motion of Luis Angel Mondragon to withdraw and dismiss his application for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court, after considering same, is of the opinion said motion should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the applications for writs of habeas corpus filed by Luis Angel Mondragon in cause numbers W01-59633-L(A), W01-49257-L(A), and W03-49258-L(A) are hereby DISMISSED. ) SIGNED this 

# 0 dayof

___

# ~Y\-~#_"_.....-_- 

# __**~** 

# ______, 2015. 

# c
JUDGE PRESIDING

EXHIBIT Applicant's Order to Withdraw and Dismiss Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus - Page 1 

# 14
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Salvador HERNANDEZ-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-15012

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 15, 2007.

Miguel Caridad, Kathleen M. Williams, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Manuel Salvador Hernandez-Gomez appeals as unreasonable his sentence of 46 months of imprisonment for illegal reentry into the United States. The advisory guidelines range was 46-57 months of imprisonment and the statutory maximum was ten years of imprisonment. Hernandez-Gomez argues that the district court expressed his disagreement with the guidelines range and imposed an unreasonable sentence. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We affirm.

“Review for reasonableness is deferential.” *United States v. Talley,*431 F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir.2005). “[T]he party who challenges the sentence bears the burden of establishing that the sentence is unreasonable in the light of both that record and the factors in section 3553(a).” *Id.*“When we review a sentence for reasonableness, we do not, as the district court did, determine the exact sentence to be imposed.” *Id. “We*must evaluate whether the sentence imposed by the district court fails to achieve the purposes of sentencing as stated in section 3553(a).” *Id.*“[W]hen the district court imposes a sentence within the advisory Guidelines range, we ordinarily will expect that choice to be a reasonable one.” *Id.*

The district court did not err. The district court correctly recognized that its general disagreement with the Sentencing Guidelines was not a legitimate reason to vary from the Guidelines. *See United States v. Williams,*456 F.3d 1353, 1366 (11th Cir.2006), *petition for cert. filed,*No. 06-7352 (U.S. Oct. 19, 2006). The district court considered the factors in section 3553(a) and sentenced Hernandez-Gomez well below the statutory maximum and at the low end of the guidelines range. That sentence is not unreasonable.

Hernandez-Gomez’s sentence is

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of B4MC Gold Mines, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bennett J. Yankowitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         | 
|------------------------ | 
|Date: June 7, 2018       | 
|                         | 
|/s/ Bennett J. Yankowitz | 
|Bennett J. Yankowitz     | 
|Chief Executive Officer  | 



This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Raleigh, North Carolina
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Kurt D Geisler
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Facility Operations Specialist
                        Phone: (919) 917-6238
                        
                        
                        Fax: (919) 856-4712(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the DSI Toys,
Inc. financial statements as of and for the three months ended April 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,364,220
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,297,455)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,973,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,802,100
<PP&E>                                       5,946,308
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,172,391)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,397,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,469,002
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,190
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,473,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,397,696
<SALES>                                      3,927,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,927,695
<CGS>                                        2,859,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,699,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,420
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (741,246)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (242,961)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (498,285)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (498,285)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
#### Thomas Gannon, Appellant, v Nicholas Juliano, Defendant, and Anthony Armenia, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 877]—

*823In an action to recover damages for assault and battery, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered May 4, 2010, as denied his renewed motion to vacate the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3216 and for leave to serve and file a late note of issue, and denied, as academic, the cross motion of the defendant Anthony Armenia for recusal.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order entered May 4, 2010, as denied, as academic, the cross motion of the defendant Anthony Armenia for recusal is dismissed, as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by that portion of the order *(see*CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered May 4, 2010, is reversed insofar as reviewed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the plaintiffs renewed motion to vacate the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3216 and for leave to serve and file a late note of issue is granted.

To vacate the dismissal of the action, the plaintiff was required to demonstrate a justifiable excuse for his delay in filing a note of issue within 90 days of a certification order as directed, and the existence of a potentially meritorious cause of action *(see*CPLR 3216 [e]; *Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co.,*89 NY2d 499, 503 [1997]; *M.V.B. Collision, Inc. v Berman,*86 AD3d 534, 534-535 [2011]; *Fenner v County of Nassau,*80 AD3d 555, 556 [2011]; *Rodriguez v Five Towns Nissan,*69 AD3d 833, 834 [2010]). Here, the plaintiff did so. Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiffs renewed motion to vacate the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3216 and for leave to serve and file a late note of issue. Rivera, J.P., Leventhal, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-32-2021]

On April 21, 2021, BMW Manufacturing Company, LLC submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 38A, in Spartanburg, South Carolina.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 22932, April 30, 2021). On August 19, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: August 19, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-18192 Filed 8-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                           CONTINENTAL CIRCUITS CORP.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
                                                              -------------------------------------
                                                                  1994       1995       1996
                                                                 ------     ------     ------
                                                              (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<S>                                                              <C>        <C>        <C>  
Historical weighted average shares outstanding (1) .........      6,160      6,747      7,430

Common share options issued within twelve months of the
planned initial public offering(2) .........................        157       --         --
                                                                 ------     ------     ------
Weighted average shares outstanding ........................      6,317      6,747      7,430
                                                                 ======     ======     ======
Net income .................................................     $3,059     $6,654     $6,283
                                                                 ======     ======     ======
Net income per share .......................................     $  .48     $  .99     $  .85
                                                                 ======     ======     ======
</TABLE>

(1)      Common stock equivalents, which were dilutive, were included in the
         computation of weighted average number of shares outstanding.

(2)      These items are treated as common stock equivalents from inception
         since they were issued at prices below the expected initial public
         offering price of the Company's common shares during the twelve month
         period immediately preceding the offering, and are computed using the
         treasury stock method assuming an estimated initial public offering
         price of $10.50 per share.
# C_2005162EN.01000201.xml

| 2.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/2

---

Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/32.448 and 32.450 — Compagnie Maritime Belge

(pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(2005/C 162/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The draft decision in this case gives rise to the following observations:

A Statement of Objections was sent to Compagnie Maritime Belge (CMB) and Dafra-Lines on 17 April 2003.

On 1 May 2003 the Commission was informed that Dafra-Lines had been liquidated on 4 March 2003. As a result, the procedure against this company was discontinued.

On 16 May 2003, a list of all documents in the files 32.450 and 32.448 was sent to CMB and to their legal representative.

On 26 May 2003, CMB requested a two month extension of the deadline to reply to the Statement of Objections, arguing that they had received the Statement of Objections shortly before the Easter weekend and that it was difficult to give an adequate reply within the deadline since the case dated back to the 1980s. I granted an extension of four weeks, that is until 15 July 2003.

Access to the file was not requested by CMB.

On 16 July 2004, CMB submitted a reply to the Statement of Objections and requested a formal oral hearing.

The formal oral hearing took place on 24 September 2003.

In the light of the above, I consider that the rights to be heard have been respected in the present case. The draft decision deals only with objections in respect of which the parties have been afforded the opportunity of making known their views.

Brussels, 15 April 2004.

Karen WILLIAMS

---
Michael Gowan 701757 Robertson Unit 12071 FM 3522 Abilene, TX 79601
Clerk 12th Court of Appeals 1517 W. Front St.,. Ste. 354 Tyler, TX 75702 June 8/ 2015 

# REC'DINCOURTOFAPPEALS] 12thCourtofAppealsDistrict

IIITMt-ri i 

### CATHYS. LUSK,

RE: Kerry Max Cook v. State, No. 12-13-00058-CR

Dear Clerk,
Please advise me whether Mr. Cook filed PDR to the Court of 

### Criminal Appeals in the above-referenced appeal? If yes, please provide me with the PDR number assigned to same. 

### Please also advise me whether you provide copy services of the 

### brief on appeal and PDR brief. If yes, please give me copy fee quotes for same. 

### Thank you for your service and prompt response. Sincerely,