alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research: Fort Pierce, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Links
                        USDA Main Page
                                    ARS Main PageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- ARS News Articles
- Research Projects
- Publications

Anne  Plotto    Research Plant Physiologist Anne Plotto, Ph.DResearch Plant Physiologist U. S. Horticultural Research Laboratory2001 South Rock RoadFort Pierce, FL 34945Telephone: (772) 462-5844Fax: (772) 462-5986Email: Anne.Plotto@usda.gov **Current Research Projects:** Dr. Plotto's research goals encompass production and storage of fruit and fruit products with high eating quality using sensory evaluation and flavor chemistry.  Current projects include flavor and off flavor in orange juice from HLB affected trees; quality evaluation of citrus, strawberries and blueberries from the USDA, ARS and University of Florida breeding programs; development of storage techniques for whole and fresh-cut fruit to optimize storage and quality.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report of CHS Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K/A-3 for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John D. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ JOHN D. JOHNSON                      
| |                                          
| | John D. Johnson                          
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

March 2, 2004
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael L. Hurt, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TB Wood's
     Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the
          period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon
     our most recent evaluation of internal control, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
     persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

Date:  July 28, 2003

Michael L. Hurt
-------------------------------
President and Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
 
                         REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
 
The Board of Directors
American Professional Holding, Inc.
 
     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American
Professional Holding, Inc. as of December 31, 1994 and 1995 and the related
consolidated statements of income and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1995. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
     We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
     In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of American
Professional Holding, Inc. at December 31, 1994 and 1995 and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
 
Ronald H. Ridgers, P.C.
Richardson, Texas
March 30, 1996
(18 Misc. Rep. 564.)

#### McKINNEY v. LONDON et al.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

November 30, 1896.)

Compulsory Reference—Issue to Pleadings—Itemized Account. .

A plaintiff is entitled to a compulsory reference where the answer embodies three counterclaims, two for money had and received, aggregating $1,418.49, composed of about 200 items, covering a period of over two years, though the third is for goods sold and delivered, which the reply admits, but pleads payment.

Appeal from special term.

Action by George T. McKinney against Louis London and another. From an order directing a compulsory reference, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Argued before SCHUCHMAN and O’DWYER, JJ.

Manheim & Manheim, for appellants.

Esselstyn & Ketcham, for respondent.

SCHUCHMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order directing a compulsory reference of the issues raised by the pleadings, on the ground that the examination of a long account is involved. The account involved is embodied in the two counterclaims set up in the defendants’ answer. These counterclaims declare causes of action on contract, to wit, money had and received by the plaintiff, for the use of the defendants, in the amounts of $881.21 and $537.28, respectively,, and which amounts are composed of about 200 separate and distinct items, spread over a period of two years. The third counterclaim sets up a cause of action for goods sold and delivered, to the amount of $89.18, and the reply admits the count, but pleads payment thereof. The issue thus raised by the plaintiff- inures to his benefit. He could claim a jury trial on that issue; but he applied for the-reference, and thereby waives his right of a jury trial. It does not lie with the defendants to demand a jury trial, as plaintiff’s rights.. The case of Peabody v. Cortada (Sup.) 21 N. Y. Supp. 680 (which holds, that, where the complaint sets up. several causes of action, one of which, at least, is not referable, a compulsory reference should not be granted), does, therefore, not apply to this case. The causes of action in the defendants’ answer not sounding in fraud or deceit, the rule that actions in tort are not referable does not apply.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

O’DWYER, J., concurs.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 El Reno, Oklahoma
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Joe  Goodballet
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Worker
                        Phone: (580) 571-6434
                        
                        
                        Fax: (580) 571-6461(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

David George Lusick, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 1952 C.D. 2015

:

Lynne Abraham, Elizabeth :

Varki Jobes, John Hunter Bennett, :

Thomas Dolgenos, Robert M. Falin, :

Ronald Eisenberg, Arnold Gordon, :

Lynne Herbert O'Connor, :

Karen Brancheau, Hugh J. Burns, :

Brad Bender, Andrew Klein :

O R D E R

NOW, September 7, 2017, having considered appellant’s application 

for reargument/reconsideration, the application is denied.

 

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHBIT 3.3


 ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                OF NISOURCE INC.


         The exact text of Article V, Section E, Paragraph 2 of the Articles:

                  "2. Designation and Amount. The shares of such series shall be
         designated as "Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares" (the
         "Series A Preferred Shares") and the number of shares constituting the
         Series A Preferred Shares shall be 4,000,000. Such number of shares may
         be increased or decreased by resolution of the Board of Directors;
         provided, that no decrease shall reduce the number of Series A
         Preferred Shares to a number less than the number of shares then
         outstanding plus the number of shares reserved for issuance upon the
         exercise of outstanding options, rights or warrants or upon the
         conversion of any outstanding securities issued by the Corporation
         convertible into Series A Preferred Shares."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Jones, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), rendered February 9, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On appeal, the defendant argues that his cross-examination into prosecution witness Edward Thomas’ credibility was impermissibly limited when he was prevented from delving into the facts underlying Thomas’ shooting of one Roosevelt Starling, for which Thomas had pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon. This contention has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05). In any event, the contention is without merit since the circumstances of the crime had been explored extensively *(see, People v Allen,*50 NY2d 898).

The defendant also asserts reversible error in the trial court’s refusal to allow him to question Thomas regarding Thomas’ alleged hostility toward the defendant’s father. However, in light of the sustained attack on Thomas’ credibility, it cannot be said that there was a "reasonable possibility” that the exclusion of this evidence affected the outcome of the trial *415
      *(see, People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, 757, *cert denied*469 US 932; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237). Finally, the record discloses that the defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0107 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0107

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Programme of Community action in the field of Health and Consumer protection (2007-2013) - Consumer aspects (COM(2005)0115 - C6-0225/2005 - 2005/0042B(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 292 E , 01/12/2006 P. 0095 - 0105 *

P6_TA(2006)0107

Community action programme in the field of consumer protection (2007-2013) ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Programme of Community action in the field of Health and Consumer protection (2007-2013) — Consumer aspects (COM(2005)0115 — C6-0225/2005 — 2005/0042B(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2005) 0115) [1],

- having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 30 June 2005 to split the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme of Community action in the field of health and consumer protection (2007-2013) in order to assign it to both theCommittee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection for the drawing up of two separate reports,

- having regard to Articles 251(2) and 153 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0225/2005),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0032/2006),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Points out that the appropriations indicated in the legislative proposal beyond 2006 are subject to the decision on the next multiannual financial framework;

3. Calls on the Commission, once the next multiannual financial framework is adopted, to present, if appropriate, a proposal to adjust the financial reference amount of the programme;

4. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agroecosystem Management Research: Lincoln, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lincoln, Nebraska Agroecosystem Management Research People & Locations







Marcus A Cureton
                        Agroecosystem Management Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid
                        Phone: (402) 472-0741
                        
                        
                        Fax: (402) 472-4020(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 21, 2009

s1014 

# Order

October 21, 2009

136580 & (22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136580 COA: 283135 Allegan CC: 03-034010-DJ CESAR CASSARRUBIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of October 27, 20 08, the defendant’s appellate counsel was directed to file a supplemental brief. On order of th e Court, appellate counsel’s response having been received, the application for leave to a ppeal the April 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is again considered, an d it is DENIED, because the de fendant has failed to meet

the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).