alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Arusyak HOVAKIMYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72654.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 19, 2011.

Raul Ernesto Godinez, Esquire, Law Office of Raul E. Godinez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Katharine Clark, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Richard M. Evans, Esquire, Assistant Director, Brooke Maurer, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*144Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arusyak Hovakimyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Hovakimyan failed to establish she suffered past persecution on account of a protected ground because there is no evidence that she was raped because of her parents’ religious beliefs. *See Donchev v. Mukasey,*553 F.3d 1206, 1214-15 (9th Cir.2009) (concluding the petitioner’s mistreatment was not on account of a protected ground where there were no contemporaneous declarations demonstrating the attackers’ motivation). Accordingly, because Hovakimyan failed to demonstrate that she was persecuted on account of a protected ground, we deny the petition as to her asylum and withholding of removal claims. *See Barrios v. Holder,*581 F.3d 849, 856 (9th Cir.2009).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Ho-vakimyan has not established she would be tortured by or with the acquiescence of the Armenian government. *See Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir.2008).

Finally, because the BIA accepted Ho-vakimyan’s testimony as credible, her motion to remand was rendered moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 99.2

THANKSGIVING COFFEE COMPANY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersignedChief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (i)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                  |
|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. |

|   | /s/ Joan Katzeff               President and Chief Financial Officer August 12, 2002 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Corvallis, Oregon
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Stefani  Morgan
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Administrative Officer
                        Phone: (541) 738-4023
                        
                        
                        Fax: (541) 738-4025(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Chantel Dicupe, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v City of New York, Defendant, William M. Michaels, Respondent, and Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc., Appellant.

*543The plaintiff Dushanska Dicupe and her daughter, Chantel, were struck by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant William M. Michaels (hereinafter Michaels) while standing on a traffic island on Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn. The plaintiffs commenced an action against Michaels and the City of New York and a separate action against Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. (hereinafter Grace), who constructed the roadway. Grace moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, which motion was supported by an affirmation of counsel, an affidavit by an assistant vice-president of the company and various documents indicating that Grace bore no responsibility for design of the structure.

The plaintiffs’ counsel submitted an affidavit stating that the case against Grace related to the "design and planning of the intersection in question”, which he conceded was performed by the City and State of New York; therefore, the plaintiffs did not object to Grace’s motion. The plaintiff Carlos Dicupe also submitted an affidavit which stated as follows: "I understand the issues of this case and agree with my counsel that defendant, anthony grace & sons, inc., has no responsibility for the accident herein and thus does not belong in this lawsuit.”

However, Michaels opposed the motion solely by way of an affirmation of counsel, who had no personal knowledge of the facts, and which contained conclusory allegations. This affirmation was insufficient, as a matter of law, to raise any triable issues of fact *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557; *Farina v Pan Am. World Airlines,*116 AD2d 618).

The motion for summary judgment by Grace should have been granted in its entirety. Dushanska and Chantel Dicupe were injured in the same accident under identical circumstances, and it is inconsistent and legally inappropriate to dismiss the action by one and not the other. If the court believed that the infant Chantel’s guardian, Carlos Dicupe, was not acting in the child’s best interest in not opposing the motion, it could have replaced him as guardian *(see,*CPLR *5441202; *Lee v Gucker,*16 Misc 2d 346). In this regard, the court’s determination not to direct such a drastic procedure was not an abuse of discretion. Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
#### CITY OF BUFFALO v. HOUCK.

(Superior Court of Buffalo,

General Term.

July, 1895.)

Action by the city of Buffalo against Louis H. Houck.

No opinion. Exceptions sustained, and verdict set aside, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. WHITE, J., does not sit in this case.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.0
Whitney American Corporation


Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to use in the Form 10-K, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Kemron Environmental Services, Inc., with and into
Whitney American Corporation of our report dated July 17, 1997, except for
Note 12, which is dated April 30, 1999, related to the financial statements of
Kemron Environmental Services, Inc. as of May 31, 1997 and for the year then
ended, which is contained therein.


/s/  Haymaker Berry Group
-------------------------
Haymaker Berry Group
Washington, DC
September 14, 1999
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

JOYCE IGLESIAS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-00849-KI

JUDGMENT

Merrill Schneider

Schneider Kerr Law Offices

P.O. Box 14490

Portland, OR 97293

Attorney for Plaintiff

Billy J. Williams

United States Attorney

District of Oregon

Page 1 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:15-cv-00849-KI Document 21 Filed 03/28/16 Page 1 of 2
Janice E. Hebert

Assistant United States Attorney

1000 SW Third Ave., Ste. 600

Portland, OR 97204-2902

Courtney Garcia

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

701 Fifth Ave., Ste. 2900 M/S 221A

Seattle, WA 98104-7075

Attorneys for Defendant

KING, Judge:

Based on the record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the

Commissioner is affirmed and this case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 28th day of March, 2016. 

 /s/ Garr M. King 

Garr M. King

United States District Judge

Page 2 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:15-cv-00849-KI Document 21 Filed 03/28/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald T. Linares                                                                            
|Ronald T. Linares                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)

October 27, 2010
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 1 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 2 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 3 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 4 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 5 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 6 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 7 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 8 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 9 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 10 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 11 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 12 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 13 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 14 of 15
Case 6:15-cv-00260-AA Document 5 Filed 02/20/15 Page 15 of 15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statements of financial condition and the consolidated statements
of operation of Unified Holdings, Inc. filed as a part of the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such report.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         426,215
<SECURITIES>                                   380,955
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,002,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,041
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,934,925
<PP&E>                                       1,390,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                 879,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,902,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          969,413
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           17,069
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,902,746
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,035,722
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,856,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,324,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                748,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            748,455
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   748,455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Joan Katzeff, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;



5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 12, 2005
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ Joan Katzeff       
|                      |  | Joan Katzeff, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME, WHICH ARE
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FILED HEREWITH, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              59
<SECURITIES>                                         5
<RECEIVABLES>                                      425
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (38)
<INVENTORY>                                        423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   936
<PP&E>                                           2,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,175)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,362
<BONDS>                                            300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           873
<OTHER-SE>                                       (307)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,228
<SALES>                                          4,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,170
<CGS>                                            2,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,953
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (66)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 21, 2018

t1217 

# Order

Clerk December 21, 2018

157680

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157680

COA: 340964

Alpena CC: 00

- 005417

- FH

KENNETH GERALD COX, 00

- 005441

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2018 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Clay Center, Nebraska
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Matthew C Friend
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Information Technology Specialist (Systems Analysis/Applications Software)
                        Phone: (402) 762-4388
                        
                        
                        Fax: (402) 762-4148(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov