alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1827 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1827

  To suspend temporarily the duty on dialkylnaphthalene sulfonic acid 
                              sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 1998

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on dialkylnaphthalene sulfonic acid 
                              sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIALKYLNAPHTHALENE SULFONIC ACID SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``     9902.29.05      Dialkylnaphthalene                                                                       
                        sulfonic acid                                                                           
                        sodium salt (CAS                                                                        
                        No. 25638-17-9)                                                                         
                        (provided for in                                                                        
                        subheading                                                                              
                        2904.10.10)......  Free         No change         No change         On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/02              
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.1
 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 CHS INC.
 (Effective May 3, 2005)
 ARTICLE I.  Name and Principal Place of Business
 Section 1.
 Section 2.
 ARTICLE II.  Purposes and Powers
 Section 1.
     Section 2.




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



Section 3.
 ARTICLE III.  Duration
  ARTICLE IV.  Membership and Authorized Capital Instruments
 Section 1.
 Section 2.
   3




---



##### 



Section 3.
 Section 4.
 Section 5.
 Section 6.
   4




---



##### 



Preferred Equity
 ARTICLE V.  Net Income and Loss
  ARTICLE VI.  First Lien
  5




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII.  Certain Corporate Actions; Dissolution
 Section 1.
 Section 2.
 ARTICLE VIII.  Board of Directors
  ARTICLE IX.  Limitation of Director Liability
   6




---



##### 



ARTICLE X.  Amendment
  7
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Manhattan, Kansas (NBAF)
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Stacy  Beougher
                        Physical Security

                        




                        
                        LOCKSMITH
                        Phone: (785) 712-3198
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Healthy Body Weight Research: Grand Forks, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Grand Forks, North Dakota Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center Healthy Body Weight Research People & Locations







Tori  Kaster
                        Healthy Body Weight Research

                        




                        
                        Physiologist
                        Phone: (701) 795-8142
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Amendment to Potlatch Corporation Management Performance Award



 Exhibit 10.6 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 POTLATCH CORPORATION 
 MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE AWARD PLAN 
 The Potlatch Corporation Management Performance Award Plan, as
amended through December 2, 2004 (the “Plan”), is hereby further amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2009: 
 Section 9(d) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: 
  

	 	“(d)	The cash portion of an Award, the payment of which was deferred under (b) above, shall be credited with earnings during the period of deferral through December 31 of the
Plan Year preceding the Plan Year in which payment of the amounts deferred hereunder is made. The earnings credited shall be based on the following: 

  

	 	(i)	For periods prior to January 1, 2009, earnings shall be calculated using an interest rate equal to 70% of the higher of the following averages, compounded annually:
(i) the prime rate charged by the major commercial banks as of the first business day of each month (as reported in an official publication of the Federal Reserve System) or (ii) the average monthly long-term rate of A-rated corporate
bonds (as published in Moody’s Bond Record). 

  

	 	(ii)	For periods on and after January 1, 2009, earnings shall be calculated using an interest rate equal to 120% of the long-term applicable federal rate, with quarterly
compounding, as published under Section 1274(d) of the Code for the first month of each calendar quarter.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       80
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         66
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   189
<PP&E>                                           1,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                     400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              302
<BONDS>                                            927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         16
<COMMON>                                           640
<OTHER-SE>                                       (674)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,398
<SALES>                                            520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   610
<CGS>                                              416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      74
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (64)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew Soscia, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 653]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lorenzo, J.), rendered January 5, 2011, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A police officer patrolling in a marked police car in a high-crime area at around 1:40 a.m. observed hand-to-hand contact between a man, later identified as the defendant, and a woman, who were standing together with two other males. The area was known as one in which narcotics sales frequently occurred, and for this reason, as well as the nature of the hand-to-hand movement, the officer suspected a drug transaction. As the officer approached the group, the woman walked away, despite the officer’s request for identification. The officer requested identification from the remaining three men; the two bystander males complied, and the officer recognized them from previous arrests for weapons possession. The defendant, however, did not respond to the officer’s request for identification, but stood with his hands in his pockets. Upon the officer’s request for identification, to state whether he had a weapon, and to remove his hands from his pockets, the defendant fled. The officer pursued him to the rear of a residence, where the defendant encountered a fence which prevented his further flight. The defendant then placed some objects on the ground, and was overtaken and handcuffed. The officer then recovered the discarded objects, which included a knife.

The hearing court properly determined that the arresting police officer had a founded suspicion that the defendant was engaged in criminal activity, triggering the common-law right of inquiry, which, by virtue of the defendant’s flight, ripened into reasonable suspicion to pursue *(see People v Sierra,*83 NY2d 928 [1994]; *People v Matienzo,*81 NY2d 778, 780 [1993]; *People*
      *1082
      *v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210, 222-223 [1976]; *People v Britt,*67 AD3d 1023, 1024 [2009]; *People v Wynn, 25*AD3d 576, 577 [2006]). Because the pursuit of the defendant was justified, the knife he discarded during the pursuit was not subject to suppression as the result of unlawful police behavior *(see People v Sierra,*83 NY2d 928 [1994]; *People v Britt,*67 AD3d at 1024; *People v Wynn,*25 AD3d at 577; *People v Riley,*290 AD2d 568 [2002]).

Accordingly, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0338 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0338

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council Regulation concerning the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Seychelles (COM(2006)0097 - C6-0102/2006 - 2006/0029(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 305 E , 14/12/2006 P. 0140 - 0141 *

P6_TA(2006)0338

EC-Seychelles Fisheries Agreement *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council Regulation concerning the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Seychelles (COM(2006)0097 — C6-0102/2006 — 2006/0029(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council Regulation (COM(2006)0097) [1],

- having regard to Article 37 and Article 300(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0102/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinion of the Committee on Development (A6-0241/2006),

1. Approves conclusion of the agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Seychelles.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
#### The People ex rel. Annie Brown et al., Respondents, *v.*E. D. Carpenter, Superintendent of the New York Juvenile Asylum, Appellant.

(Argued October 7, 1890;

decided October 14, 1890.)

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme-Court in the first judicial department, made June 13, 1890, which affirmed in part an order of Special Term overruling a demurrer by defendant to a traverse to the returns to the writs of habeas corpus and certiorari herein, and directing the-relator’s discharge from the New York Juvenile Asylum.

The following is the *mem.*of opinion:

“ Since the decision of *People ex rel. Vcm Riper*v. *New York Catholic Po'otectory*(106 N. Y. 604), subdivision 5 of' section 219 of'the Penal Code has been amended by chapter 145, section 6, Laws of 1888, so that the presence of either parent is sufficient at the examination before the court or magistrate. The case here shows that the mother was present.”

*Elbridge T. Gerry*for appellant.

*Purdy & McLaughlin*for respondents.

Agree to reverse so much of the order of the General Term as was appealed from an order made discharging writ as to the person of Annie Brown and remanding her to the custody of the defendant under the order of commitment.

All concur.

Ordered accordingly.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 10, 2013

No. 04

- 13

- 00044

- CR

Andrea LARRAIN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 373475

The Honorable John D. Fleming

, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we order this appeal DISMISSED

FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on April 10, 2013

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of April, 2013

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:       August 14, 2006         By  /s/ Louis Prichard
                                    Louis Prichard
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer

Date:       August 14, 2006         By  /s/ Gregory J. Dawson
                                    Gregory J. Dawson
                                    Chief Financial Officer



26
Lexlibrary/197885.1
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May

2 , 2024.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 24

- 00311

- CV

IN RE TAYLOR C. MOSS , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No

. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 484,673



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 30, 2024 , relator Taylor C. Moss filed a petition for writ of

m andamus i n this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Jerry W. Simoneaux, presiding judge of the Probate Court No

. 1 of Harris County
, to2

vacate the trial court’s April 30, 2024 order granting p laintiffs’ m otion to c ompel oral and video deposition of relator in post judgment enforcement action.

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Hassan, and Poissant.
1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

NICHOLAS J. HOGAN,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:15-cv-00315-CL

v. ORDER

CAROLYN V. COLVIN, Commissioner of 

the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31), and 

the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although 

plaintiff did not file objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. 

Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is 

correct. Judge Clarke’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) is adopted. The 

Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for the calculation of benefits under 

42 U.S.C. §405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 9th day of May, 2016.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________

Michael McShane

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-00315-CL Document 33 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Stoneville, Mississippi
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Walter Ray Smith
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Custodial Worker
                        Phone: (662) 686-5249
                        
                        
                        Fax: (662) 686-9406(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of Lisa S., Respondent, v William V., Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 886] —

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Andrea Masley, J.), entered on or about January 26, 2011, which, after a hearing in a proceeding brought pursuant to article 8 of the Family Court Act, granted petitioner’s application for a final order of protection in her favor which expires on January 25, 2013, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record amply supports Family Court’s determination that a two-year order of protection is warranted. The court’s credibility determinations, made in connection with this determination, should be accorded deference, and we find no basis to disturb them *(see Matter of F.B. v W.B.,*248 AD2d 119 [1998]; *Matter of Baez v Martinez,*255 AD2d 131, 132 [1998]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.