alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center: El Reno, OK
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Todd Joel Smith
                        Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center

                        




                        
                        Secretary (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (405) 443-3306
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      804
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,530
<PP&E>                                           5,615
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,805
<BONDS>                                          1,081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        300
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,177
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,424
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  78
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    145
<INCOME-TAX>                                        46
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 99
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        99
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TB Wood's Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information continued in the report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                             <C>                                <C>
September 28, 2005              /s/ William T. Fejes               President and Chief Executive Officer
                                -------------------
                                   William T. Fejes

September 28, 2005              /s/Joseph C. Horvath               Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
                                --------------------
                                   Joseph C. Horvath

</TABLE>

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TB Wood's Corporation and will be retained by TB Wood's Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50578

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ascencion Luna-Hernandez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:22-CR-2199-1

______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ascencion Luna-Hernandez has 

moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). LunaHernandez has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 29, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50578 Document: 57-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/29/2024
No. 23-50578

2

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-50578 Document: 57-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/29/2024
#### Bryant WOODS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 05-195

205 S.W.3d 148

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 10, 2005

*Thomas B. Devine, III,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Thomas B. Devine III, a full-time, state-salaried public defender for the Sixth Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant, Bryant Woods, an *153indigent defendant, on the charge of capital murder. Following a trial, he was convicted of the charge and was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. A notice of appeal was timely filed, and a request for the transcribed record has been timely lodged in this court.

Mr. Devine now moves to withdraw as counsel on appeal based upon *Rushing v. State,*340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), which held that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal. Since *Rushing,*the General Assembly has passed legislation providing that only those full-time, state-salaried public defenders who do not have state-funded secretaries may seek compensation for their work on appeal. See Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2003).

Mr. Devine states in his motion that he is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary who maintains his day-today office operations. Accordingly, we grant his motion to withdraw.

Mr. Brent Houston will be substituted as counsel for appellant in this matter. The Clerk will establish a new briefing schedule.

It is so ordered.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 160 (Monday, August 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 47161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17935]



[[Page 47161]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Modification Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit modification request received and permit 
issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish a 
notice of requests to modify permits issued to conduct activities 
regulated under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the 
required notice of a requested permit modification and permit issued.

DATES: October 30, 2016-January 31, 2023.
    The permit modification was issued on August 17, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Polly Penhale, ACA Permit Officer, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-7420; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9f8faf8c9dccbd4d0cdcaf9d7cadf97ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e0f0d0f3e2b3c23273a3d0e203d2860292138">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Science Foundation (NSF), as 
directed by the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541, 45 
CFR 670), as amended by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation 
Act of 1996, has developed regulations for the establishment of a 
permit system for various activities in Antarctica and designation of 
certain animals and certain geographic areas a requiring special 
protection.
    NSF issued a permit (ACA 2017-015) to Leidos Innovations Group on 
October 30, 2016. The issued permit allows the permit holder entry into 
Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs). The following ASPAs 
containing historic huts from the Heroic Age of Antarctic Exploration: 
ASPA 155 Cape Evans, Ross Island; ASPA 157 Backdoor Bay, Cape Royds, 
Ross; ASPA 158 Hut Point, Ross Island and ASPA 159 Cape Adare, 
Borchgrevink Coast. The permit allows for educational visits to the 
historic huts for persons associated with the United States Antarctic 
Program. The permit holder proposes a permit modification to extend the 
expiration date of the permit until January 31, 2023.
    The Environmental Officer has reviewed the modification request and 
has determined that the amendment is not a material change to the 
permit, and it will have a less than a minor or transitory impact.

Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2021-17935 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 4(f)


 


PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

P.O. BOX 2606

BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35202


 


Endorsement


 


The Contract or Certificate to
which this Endorsement is attached is amended as of its Effective Date.


 


The following sentence is added
to the GENERAL PROVISION entitled Settlement:


 


The
Owner/Participant may elect to apply settlement proceeds, including any full or
partial surrender proceeds or the death benefit, to any payout option offered
by us for such payments at the time the election is made.


 


Signed for the Company as of
the Effective Date.


 


PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY


 


	
  /s/ Deborah J. Long

  	
   

  
	
  Deborah J. Long

  	
   

  
	
  Secretary

  	
   

  



 


	
  IPD-2085

  	
  9/96
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0571 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0571

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a procedure for prior examination and consultation in respect of certain laws, regulations and administrative provisions concerning transport proposed in Member States (codified version) (COM(2006)0284 - C6-0185/2006 - 2006/0099(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 317 E , 23/12/2006 P. 0598 - 0599 *

20061223

P6_TA(2006)0571

Procedure for prior examination and consultation in respect of certain provisions concerning transport proposed in Member States (codified version) ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a procedure for prior examination and consultation in respect of certain laws, regulations and administrative provisions concerning transport proposed in Member States (codified version) (COM(2006)0284 — C6-0185/2006 — 2006/0099(COD))

(Codecision procedure: codification)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0284) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 71 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0185/2006),

- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts [2],

- having regard to Rules 80, 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0458/2006);

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

--------------------------------------------------
735 A.2d 79

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Garry A. NELSON, Respondent

No. 535 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 20, 1999.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 1999, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 2,1999, it is hereby

ORDERED that GARRY A. NELSON, be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one (1) year and one (1) day, retroactive to May 21, 1998, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
TAD BRADLEY, 

V. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PENDLETON DIVISION 

Petitioner, Case No. 2:14-cv-01548-YY 

OPINION AND ORDER 

MARK NOOTH, Superintendent of Snake 

River Correctional institution, 

Respondent. 

MOSMAN,J., 

On March 29, 2022, Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued her Findings and 

Recommendation ("F. & R.") [ECF 165]. Judge You recommends that I deny the Second 

Amended Petition for Writ 9fHabeas Corpus [ECF 154] and dismiss this case with prejudice . . 

Additionally, she recommends that the Court decline to issue a Certificate of Appealability 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Petitioner filed objections [ECF 175] and Respondent 

responded [ECF 176]. I agree with Judge You. 

STANDARD OF REVIEW 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge 

but retains responsibility for making the fmal determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de nova or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 2:14-cv-01548-YY Document 177 Filed 06/02/22 Page 1 of 2
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F. & R. to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F. & R. 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F. & R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). 

CONCLUSION 

Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation, and I ADOPT her F. & R. 

[ECF 165] as my own opinion. I DENY the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus [ECF 154] and dismiss this case with prejudice. Additionally, I decline to issue a 

Certificate of Appealability on the basis that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253( c )(2). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 1i.. day of June, 2022. 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 2:14-cv-01548-YY Document 177 Filed 06/02/22 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1895

For the relief of Augusto Segovia and Maria Segovia, husband and wife,

and their children.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 1, 1998

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Augusto Segovia and Maria Segovia,

husband and wife, and their children.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), the aliens named in section 3 shall be held

7 and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the

8 United States for permanent residence as of the date of

9 the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required

10 visa fees.
2

•S 1895 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to the

3 aliens named in section 3 as provided in this Act, the Sec4 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce

5 by the appropriate number during the current fiscal year

6 the total number of immigrant visas available to natives

7 of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a)

8 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

9 1153(a)).

10 SEC. 3. COVERED ALIENS.

11 The aliens named in this section are the following:

12 (1) Augusto Ernesto Segovia and Maria Isabel

13 Irene Chumbez de Segovia, husband and wife.

14 (2) The following children of the aliens named

15 in paragraph (1):

16 (A) Edelmira Isabel Segovia.

17 (B) Perla Franccesca Segovia.

18 (C) Augusto Thomas Segovia.

Æ
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1451

To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 7, 1997

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new item:

‘‘ 9902.32.42 2,7-

naphthalenedisulfonic

acid, 4-

(benzoylamino)-5-

hydroxy-,sodium salt

(CAS No. 79873–

39–5) (provided for

in subheading

2924.29.70.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2000 ’’.
2

•S 1451 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 enactment of this Act.

Æ
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1639

To amend the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of

1986 to cover Federal facilities.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

Mr. COVERDELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Emergency Planning and Community RightTo-Know Act of 1986 to cover Federal facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Facilities

5 Community Right-To-Know Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF FEDERAL FACILITIES UNDER THE

7 EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY

8 RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT OF 1986.

9 Section 329(7) of the Emergency Planning and Com10 munity Right-To-Know Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 11049(7))
2

•S 1639 IS

1 is amended by inserting ‘‘or the United States’’ before the

2 period at the end.

Æ
#### Rayfus Butler, Appellant-Respondent, v Quest Property Management V. Corp., Defendant, and Cablevision Sys*679tems Corp., Respondent-Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 887] —

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered August 5, 2011, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendant Cablevision Systems Corp.’s Labor Law § 240 (1) liability, denied Cablevision’s cross motion for dismissal of plaintiff’s section 240 (1) claim, and granted Cablevision’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs Labor Law § 241 (6) and § 200 claims and common-law negligence claims, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant Cablevision’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs section 240 (1) claim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Labor Law § 240 (1) does not apply here as plaintiff was not engaged in any alteration of the building at the time of the occurrence. The argument that his inspection might have led to additional work is mere speculation.

The motion court properly dismissed the Labor Law § 241 (6) and § 200 and common-law negligence claims. There is no evidence that plaintiff was engaged in construction, excavation or demolition work that would bring his work within the ambit of section 241 (6). With regard to the section 200 and common-law negligence claims, there is also no evidence that Cablevision exercised supervision or control over the work performed at the premises *(Campuzano v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*54 AD3d 268 [2008]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.