alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Versata, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended January 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Frederick, Interim President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Vice-President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: March 16, 2005



By:

/s/ WILLIAM FREDERICKWilliam FrederickInterim President and Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer, Secretary and Vice-President
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 160 (Monday, August 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 47152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18003]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--UHD Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 10, 2021, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), UHD Alliance, Inc. (``UHD 
Alliance'') filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Onkyo Home Entertainment Corporation, Osaka, JAPAN has 
been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and UHD Alliance intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 17, 2015, UHD Alliance filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on July 17, 2015 (80 FR 42537).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 22, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 8, 2021 (86 FR 18299).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-18003 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John W. Riley, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of META Group, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a.               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b.              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c.               presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.               all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.              any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whetheror not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of ourmost recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: November 15, 2004

 
| /s/ John W. Riley                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

1

----
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Musetta Beattie, Respondent, v Bruce J. Ebbels et al., Appellants, and Special Disability Fund, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Kane, J.

Claimant has been employed as office manager in a doctor’s office since 1965. She suffered a compensable injury on February 25, 1981 which resulted in an award for a permanent partial disability. At the time of her original employment, her employer, a doctor, was aware that she had previously been operated on for a herniated disc. However, the record demonstrates that she satisfactorily performed all her duties and never complained of any difficulties in the performance thereof.

The issue presented is whether claimant’s employer possessed the requisite knowledge of a preexisting permanent disability at the time she was originally hired in 1965 to establish the liability of the Special Fund under the provisions of Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (8). In our view, this record supports the Worker’s Compensation Board’s determination of lack of the requisite knowledge *(see, Matter of O’Reilly v Raymond Concrete Piling,*47 NY2d 891; *Matter of MacWilliams v Conap, Inc.,*56 AD2d 944, *lv denied*42 NY2d 801). Additionally, we find the jurisdictional issue raised by *383the carrier to be without merit *(see, Matter of Clifford v Larkin Rest.,*31 AD2d 866).

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Special Disability Fund. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Weiss, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1772

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pile fabrics of man-made fibers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 17, 1998

Mr. JEFFORDS (for himself and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pile fabrics of

man-made fibers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CER4 TAIN PILE FABRICS OF MAN-MADE FIBERS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.60.01 Pile fabric of manmade fibers provided

for in (subheading

6001.92.00) .............. Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2001 ’’.
2

•S 1772 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered,

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of

5 this Act.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** JUDGMENT N os. 04 - 14 - 00452 - CV, 04 - 14 - 00568 - CV & 04 - 14 - 00597 - CV Mark HART and Angelica Hart, Julian Calderas, Jr. and Erica Calderas, and Thomas H. Veitch and Anne Veitch , Appellants v. FLAGSHIP HOMES, LTD. d/b/a Prestige Homes, Appellee From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2014 - CI - 04333, 2014 - CI - 04330 & 2014 - CI - 04337 Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE , JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE C HAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the orders of the trial court are REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them. SIGNED December 10, 2014.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                            THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                    EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
                                  THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                 DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                                                   TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         824098
<NAME>                        SCOTTSDALE LAND TRUST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                         U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           2,418,201
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,094,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,259,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,100,287
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,259,651
<SALES>                                          5,003,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,981,588
<CGS>                                            3,036,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,974,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,974,758
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,974,758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        39.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                                

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 3.7 

 

**AMENDMENT TO THE RESTATED BYLAWS OF**

**FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY**

**Effective September 6, 2005**

 

I, Katherine L. Greenzang, Secretary, of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (the“Company”), do hereby certify that, in connection with the change of the Company’s name to “Union Security Insurance Company,” the following amendment to the Restated Bylaws of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company was dulyadopted by the Board of Directors and the sole stockholder of the Company on December 2, 2004, to be effective on September 6, 2005. 

Article VII was amended by deleting Section 2 thereof and replacing it with the following new Section 2: 

 

****“**CORPORATE SEAL**”****

Section 2. The corporate seal of this Company shall be a circular die, around the edge of which shall appear the words, “Union Security Insurance Company,” or such other name as the Board of Directorsand stockholders of the Company may adopt from time to time, and in the center of which shall appear the words, “Corporate Seal.”
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Emmanuel Marshall, Doing Business as Harmony Homes Realty, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Lesly Bataille, Doing Business as Bataille Realty, and Max Bataille, Respondents.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Mishiyeva Law, PLLC (Kamilla Mishiyeva, Esq.), for appellant.Lesly Bataille and Max Bataille, respondents pro se (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Adam Silvera, J.), entered April 29, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover the principal sum of $12,000, based on defendants' alleged failure to pay him the balance of a real estate brokerage commission. At a nonjury trial, plaintiff testified that, together with defendant Lesly Bataille, Doing Business as Bataille Realty, he had co-brokered the sale of premises owned by defendant Max Bataille, and that the parties had agreed that he would be paid half of a total 6% commission on the contract price of $1,200,000, or $36,000, but that he had instead been paid only $24,000. Defendant Lesly Bataille testified that the contract price for the premises had been $1,200,000, and that she had agreed to split a 6% brokerage commission evenly with plaintiff, but that, at the closing, which plaintiff had not attended, all the participants in the transaction had made concessions. As a result, the brokerage commission had been reduced from 6% to 4%, slightly over half of which had been paid to plaintiff. Following the trial, the complaint was dismissed upon a finding that plaintiff had failed to make out a prima facie case, and that defendant Lesly Bataille's testimony had been consistent and credible.</p><p>It appears from the record that the only matter in dispute was whether defendant Lesly <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>Bataille had actual or implied authority to negotiate a reduction in plaintiff's commission. The parties provided no evidence on this issue. Under these circumstances, we are of the view that a new trial is warranted. </p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the action is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: February 09, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southeast Watershed Research: Tifton, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Scientific Partnerships
                        Long Term Agriculture Research Network (LTAR)
                                    GA Coastal Plain LTAR
                                    NRCS Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP)
                                    Southeast Biomass Research Center
                    About Us
                        History & Program
                                    Business Partnerships
                                    Models
                                    Public DataSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Tifton, Georgia Southeast Watershed Research People & Locations







Emily Bray Myers
                        Southeast Watershed Research

                        




                        
                        Student Trainee (Biological Science)
                        Phone: (229) 387-2375
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K of HearUSA, Inc. (the Company) for
the period ending December 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Stephen J. Hansbrough,
Chief Executive Officer and Gino Chouinard, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

March 26, 2004

| |                                                                                                                                    
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Stephen J. Hansbrough 
     _________________________________________ 
     Stephen J. Hansbrough 
     Chief Executive Officer
| | HearUSA, Inc.                                                                                                                      

March 26, 2004

| |                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Gino Chouinard                                            
| | _________________________________________ 
     Gino Chouinard
| | Chief Financial Officer                                       
| | HearUSA, Inc.                                                 

76
#### Alexander R. Carusone, Jr., Respondent, v Three Centers (OLROHO) Associates, Defendant, and Price Chopper Company et al., Appellants.

— Kane, J.

Plaintiff was injured at the storage and warehouse facility of defendant Price Chopper Company in the course of unloading a truck at its loading dock. The complaint, in three separate causes of action, seeks recovery against both defendant Golub Corporation and defendant Price Chopper Company, a wholly owned subsidiary which operates Price Chopper Supermarkets on behalf of Golub. The first cause of action *318alleges violations of the Labor Law; the second, strict products liability; and the third, negligence. In each cause of action, plaintiff alleges he was an employee of defendants. Accordingly, both Golub and Price Chopper on this appeal set forth as an affirmative defense that plaintiff’s exclusive remedy is pursuant to the provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law *(see,*Workers’ Compensation Law § 11).

The record demonstrates that, at the time of plaintiff’s injury, the State Insurance Fund had issued a workers’ compensation insurance policy covering Golub and/or Price Chopper and that an employer’s report of injury had been filed by Golub and/or Price Chopper with the Workers’ Compensation Board, which resulted in a decision establishing accident, notice and causal relation. It is the contention of plaintiff that the matter is not ripe for summary judgment since the record does not demonstrate a sufficient basis to establish that Golub and Price Chopper are operating as one corporate entity, nor does the record adequately identify which of them actually employed the plaintiff. We disagree.

There is a sufficient showing of the relationship between Golub and Price Chopper when the record is examined in its entirety. The admission of plaintiff, the affidavits in support of the motions for summary judgment made by representatives of Golub and Price Chopper, the State Insurance Fund and its policy of insurance, all lend further support to the legal conclusion that plaintiff’s exclusive remedy against these defendants is pursuant to the provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law *(see, Shine v Duncan Petroleum Transp.,*60 NY2d 22).

Order reversed, on the law, without costs, motions granted and complaint dismissed against defendants Price Chopper Company and Golub Corporation. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Weiss, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.