alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2 Section 906 - CFO Certification

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patriot Bank Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James G. Blume,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ JAMES G. BLUME
--------------------------
James G. Blume
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2003

                                       32
#### In the Matter of Ronnie Covington, Petitioner, v John Lempke, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 713]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Seneca County [Dennis F. Bender, A.J.], entered Nov. 2, 2011) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier II hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present — Centra, J.E, Peradotto, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Troy A Dailey
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Utility Systems Supervisor
                        Phone: (515) 337-7714
                        
                        
                        Fax: (515) 337-7149(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of Tayshawn S., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Tyon S., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 872]—

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about May 4, 2011, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent mother neglected the subject child, placed the child in the custody and guardianship of the Commissioner of Social Services until completion of the next scheduled permanency hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of neglect was supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f]; § 1046 [b] [i]). The evidence showed that respondent left her six-year-old son alone in their apartment after midnight for two to three hours, lied to police by telling them that the child was staying with her mother, hit the child with a brush on another occasion, and burned him with a hot cigarette lighter *(see e.g. Matter of Shayna R.,*57 AD3d 262 [2008]). There exists no basis upon which to disturb the court’s credibility determinations *(see Matter of Jared S. [Monet S.],*78 AD3d 536 [2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 705 [2011]).

We have considered respondent’s remaining contentions, including that her due process rights were violated, and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, DeGrasse, Richter and Román, JJ.
#### Gonzalvo de Cordova, Respondent, *v.*Nathaniel B. Powter, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

(Argued October 7, 1890;

decided October 21, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March 12, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*Joseph A. Shoudy*for appellant.

*Jefferson Clark*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
(18 Misc. Rep. 61.)

#### GOLDSTEIN v. GREENBERG et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

September 28, 1896.)

Appeal—Modification of Judgment—Increasing Amount.

Where a judgment for plaintiff in an action for wages earned by a female employed other than as a domestic servant fails to award the five dollars additional costs, as provided by Laws 1882, c. 410 (Consolidation Act) §§ 1420,1424, it may, on appeal, be modified by adding such additional costs.

Appeal from Fourth district court.

*22Action by Rebecca Goldstein against Charles Greenberg and another for wages other than as a domestic servant. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, but the justice omitted to insert the five dollars additional costs, and plaintiff appeals. Modified.

Argued before DALY, P. J., and McADAM and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Isaac A. Hourwich, for appellant.

Abraham D. Levy, for respondents.

DALY, P. J.

As the action was for wages earned by a female employed other than as a domestic servant, and the amount of damages recovered was less than $10, plaintiff is entitled to $5 additional costs, and the justice should have inserted that amount in the judgment. Laws 1882, c. 410 (Consolidation Act) §§ 1420, 1424. As the respondent does not dispute this, and there is no question upon which a new trial need be ordered, we shall direct that the judgment be modified by adding the $5 additional costs. Where there is a mere error in a matter of figures, and a new trial will not change the result, a judgment may be modified even by increasing the amount of the recovery. Golde v. Whipple, 7 App. Div. 48, 39 N. Y. Supp. 964.

The judgment modified accordingly, without costs to either party. All concur.
#### Philip G. Hubert et al., Respondents, *v.*John W. Aitken, Appellant.

(Argued October 10, 1890;

decided October 28, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered *656upon an order made March 8, 1889, which modified and' afiirmed, as modified, a judgment in favor of plaintiffs.» entered upon the report of a referee. • •

*Delos McCurdy*for appellant.

*Lemuel B. Skidmore for*respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Section 1350 Certification**
     In connection with the Annual Report of Nextel Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul N. Saleh, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002) that, to the best of my knowledge:
     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: March 14, 2005    /s/ Paul N. Saleh   Paul N. Saleh
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1863 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1863

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain polyethylene base materials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 1998

  Mrs. Murray introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain polyethylene base materials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN POLYETHYLENE BASE MATERIALS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``   9902.39.20       Polyethylene                                                                              
                       base materials                                                                           
                       that are under                                                                           
                       250mm in width,                                                                          
                       sanded on 1                                                                              
                       side and                                                                                 
                       surface-treated                                                                          
                       for use in the                                                                           
                       manufacture of                                                                           
                       skis (provided                                                                           
                       for in                                                                                   
                       subheading                                                                               
                       3920.10.00)....  Free              No change         No change        On or before 12/   
                                                                                              31/2000           
                                                                                                              ''

    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

WILLIAM BONIFAS, 

Case No. 6:15-cv-00718-MA 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN COL VIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

MARSH, Judge. 

ORDER 

Based on the Stipulation (ECF No. 23) of the patties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney 

fees in the amount of $2,536.26, and costs in the amount of $400.00 for filing fees, are hereby 

awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this 

award shall be paid via check made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney Merrill 

Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, P01tland, OR 97293. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (1970), 

the award shall be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney if the Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff 

owes no debt to the government through the federal treasuty offset program. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this dday of December, 2016. 

~.4--.h?~ Malcolm F. Marsh 

United States District Judge 

1 - ORDERCase 6:15-cv-00718-MA Document 25 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

d0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

138692 

CITY OF CENTER LINE, 

Plaintiff/CounterDefendant-Appellant, 

v SC: 138692 

 COA: 289248 

Macomb CC: 2008-001037-CL 

POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF 

MICHIGAN, INC., and ANGELA POST, 

Defendants/CounterPlaintiffs-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Brian D. Hoffner, Appellant, v Salvatore Romano, as Warden, Respondent.

— In a habeas corpus proceeding challenging the petitioner’s detention on the ground that excessive bail had been set, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated November 10, 1983, which dismissed the writ.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as moot, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner was long ago released from custody on the charges for which bail was set. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THE  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AS OF NOVEMBER  30, 1997 AND THE  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1997.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000823975
<NAME>                        Columbus Energy Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,857
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116
<INVENTORY>                                    102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,911
<PP&E>                                         35,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,189
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       898
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,135
<SALES>                                        13,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,096
<CGS>                                          3,107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,429
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,167
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.55
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Versata, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended January 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2003 (the Report), I, James Doehrman, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Executive Vice President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                     |  | 
|-------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 14, 2003 |  | 
|                     |  | 
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |
#### Riedman Agency, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Meaott Construction Corp., Appellant-Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated at Special Term, Tillman, J. (Appeals from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Tillman, J. — summary judgment.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soybean and Nitrogen Fixation Research: Raleigh, NC
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Videos
                        Packing Seeds During Covid-19
                                    Soybean Breeding Video Series
                                    Wild Soybean Breeding Research
                                    Improving Yield
                    Popular Press
                        New USB-FFAR partnership boosts protein in soybeans
                                    Solutions and Sustainability in Soybean Breeding
                                    USDA plant breeder leading way in new soybean
                                    Collaboration looks to help soybeans handle climate change
                                    Pay soybean farmers more for higher protein
                                    Soybean researcher hopes to borrow genes from wild lines to improve yield, composition and pest resistance in varieties that farmers grow
                                    Genetic diversity in wild soybeans could improve today’s yield, composition, stress resistance and moreSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Raleigh, North Carolina Soybean and Nitrogen Fixation Research People







Tiffany R Sikes    Biological Laboratory Technical /ARSUserFiles/51663/profile pic_TIFFANY_resize.jpg My CV
My LinkedIn


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Page 1 – DECLARATION OF RACHAEL WIGGINS

PORTLAND CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

1221 SW 4TH AVENUE, RM 430 

PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 

(503) 823-4047

TRACY REEVE, Oregon State Bar ID Number 891123 

City Attorney 

Email: Tracy.Reeve@portlandoregon.gov

J. SCOTT MOEDE, Oregon State Bar ID Number 934816 

Chief Deputy City Attorney 

Email: Scott.Moede@portlandoregon.gov

Kenneth A. McGair, Oregon State Bar ID Number 990148 

Senior Deputy City Attorney 

Email: Ken.McGair@portlandoregon.gov

Office of City Attorney 

1221 SW Fourth Avenue, Room 430 

Portland, OR 97204 

Tele: 503-823-4047 

Fax: 503-823-3089 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Portland 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal 

corporation of the State of Oregon, 

 PLAINTIFF, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, and RASIER, LLC, its wholly 

owned subsidiary, 

 DEFENDANTS.

3:14-cv-01958-SI

DECLARATION OF 

RACHAEL WIGGINS 

(In Support of Plaintiff’ Motion for a 

Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary 

Injunction. 

I, Rachael Wiggins, make this declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Motion for a 

Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. 

1. I am employed as a Policy Assistant for the Mayor of the City of Portland, Oregon. 

2. Attached to this declaration as Exhibit A is a true and accurate copy of an email 

received by the Mayor’s Senior Policy Director Josh Alpert from Brooke Steger, Uber General 

Case 3:14-cv-01958-SI Document 13 Filed 12/10/14 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 – DECLARATION OF RACHAEL WIGGINS

PORTLAND CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

1221 SW 4TH AVENUE, RM 430 

PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 

(503) 823-4047

Manager, dated December 6, 2014, at 10:56 a.m. This is a business record kept in the ordinary court 

of the City’s business. 

I hereby declare that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and 

belief, and that I understand it is made for use as evidence in court and is subject to penalty 

for perjury. 

DATED: December 10, 2014. 

s/ Rachel Wiggins 

Rachael Wiggins 

Case 3:14-cv-01958-SI Document 13 Filed 12/10/14 Page 2 of 2