alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                  Exhibit 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
TBM Holdings Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-88424) on Form S-8 of TBM Holdings Inc. (formerly known as Specialty Retail
Group, Inc.) of our report dated March 30, 2001, relating to the consolidated
balance sheet of TBM Holdings Inc. as of December 30, 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive
loss, and cash flows, for the year then ended, which report appears in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of TBM Holdings Inc.





                                    KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 30, 2001
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of International
Packaging and Logistics Group, Inc.,(the "Company") on Form 10K for the
year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the
undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/  Steve
Westlund


Steve
Westlund


Chief
Executive Officer, President


and
Director





April 9,
2009
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Production Systems Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About CPSRU
                        CPSRU Mission StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Crop Production Systems Research People & Locations







Neely  Wright

((neal))
                        Crop Production Systems Research

                        




                        
                        BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone: (662) 686-3147
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="Microsoft Word 97">
<TITLE>EX21.1</TITLE>
<META NAME="Template" CONTENT="C:\PROGRAM FILES\MICROSOFT OFFICE\OFFICE\html.dot">
</HEAD>
<BODY LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#800080">

<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">EXHIBIT 21.1</P>
<B><P ALIGN="CENTER">REPAP ENTERPRISES INC. & SUBSIDIARIES</P>
</B><P ALIGN="JUSTIFY"> </P>
<TABLE CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0 CELLPADDING=7 WIDTH=590>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P>REPAP ENTERPRISES INC. - Incorporated under the laws of Canada <BR>
          (formerly Repap Enterprises Corporation Inc. -<BR>
          formerly Quinsprack Limited)</TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P>ALCELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. -Continued under the laws of the Province of New Brunswick<BR>
          (formerly Alcell Developments Inc. - formerly 155945 Canada Inc.)</TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P>BLACKVILLE LUMBER INC. - Incorporated under the laws of the Province of New Brunswick</TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P>REPAP MARKETING INC. - Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware<BR>
          (formerly Green Forest Corporation, into which was merged the original<BR>
          Repap Ferrostaal (U.S.A.) Inc.)<BR>
          (formerly Repap Ferrostaal (U.S.A.)<BR>
          (formerly Repap Development Inc.)<BR>
          (merged with Repap Technologies Inc.)</TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
<P>REPAP NEW BRUNSWICK INC. - Incorporated under the laws of Canada<BR>
          (formerly Miramichi Pulp & Paper Inc.,)<BR>
          (formerly Acadia Forest Products Limited)<BR>
          (formerly Aidaca Pulp & Paper Limited)</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></P></BODY>
</HTML>
# C_2006318EN.01012201.xml

| 23.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/122 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/122

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Council Regulation on glucose and lactose (codified version)

COM(2006) 116 final — 2006/0038 CNS

(2006/C 318/22)

On 2 May 2006, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 308 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

The Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment, which was responsible for the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 11 July 2006. The rapporteur was Mr Donnelly.

At its 429th plenary session held on 13 and 14 September 2006 (meeting of 13 September), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 187 votes to one and seven abstentions.

1.   Introduction

| 1.1 | The purpose of this proposal is to undertake a codification of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2730/75 of 29 October 1975 on glucose and lactose. The new Regulation will supersede the various acts incorporated in it; this proposal fully preserves the content of the acts being codified and hence does no more than bringing them together with only such formal amendments as are required by the codification exercise itself. |
| --- | --- |

1.1

The purpose of this proposal is to undertake a codification of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2730/75 of 29 October 1975 on glucose and lactose. The new Regulation will supersede the various acts incorporated in it; this proposal fully preserves the content of the acts being codified and hence does no more than bringing them together with only such formal amendments as are required by the codification exercise itself.

2.   General comments

| 2.1 | In the context of a people's Europe, the European Economic and Social Committee supports the Commission in simplifying and clarifying Community law so as to make it clearer and more accessible to ordinary citizens, thus giving them new opportunities and the chance to make use of the specific rights it gives them. |
| --- | --- |

2.1

In the context of a people's Europe, the European Economic and Social Committee supports the Commission in simplifying and clarifying Community law so as to make it clearer and more accessible to ordinary citizens, thus giving them new opportunities and the chance to make use of the specific rights it gives them.

| 2.2 | The Committee believes that codification must be undertaken in full compliance with the normal Community legislative procedure. |
| --- | --- |

2.2

The Committee believes that codification must be undertaken in full compliance with the normal Community legislative procedure.

Brussels, 13 September 2006.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CHARLES P. BOONE, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JOHN MYRICK, Superintendent, 

Two Rivers Correctional Inst., 

Respondent. 

MOSMAN,J., 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

No. 2:14-cv-01645-TC 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On May 31, 2017, Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin issued his Findings and 

Recommendation ("F&R") [46], recommending that Charles P. Boone's Amended Petition for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus [20] should be DENIED and that a Certificate of Appealability should be 

DENIED. Petitioner did not object. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F &R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any pmt of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). 

I agree with Judge Coffin's recommendation and ADOPT the F&R [46] as my own 

opinion. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Mr. Boone's Amended Petition for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus [20] is DENIED and is thus DISMISSED, and a Certificate of Appealability is 

DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this lO dayofOctober,2017. 

2 - OPINION AND ORDER
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and   Date:  March 16, 2007                                                 By: /s/ Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard Chief Executive Officer  Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              12
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      796
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,363
<PP&E>                                           5,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,471
<BONDS>                                          1,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        300
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,141
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,679
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    206
<INCOME-TAX>                                        67
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       140
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Kimberly, Idaho
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Michelle R Wayment
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Administrative Officer
                        Phone: (208) 423-6566
                        
                        
                        Fax: (208) 423-6555(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

Calendar No. 491

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1731

[Report No. 105–261]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel FALLS POINT.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH, 9, 1998

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

JULY 23, 1998

Reported by Mr. MCCAIN, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

FALLS POINT.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1731 RS

1 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

2 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

3 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

4 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

5 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code,

6 the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of

7 documentation with appropriate endorsement for employ8 ment in the coastwise trade for the vessel FALLS POINT,

9 United States Official Number 346217.

Calendar No. 491

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1731

[Report No. 105–261]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

wise trade for the vessel FALLS POINT.priate endorsement for employment in the coastissue a certificate of documentation with approJULY 23, 1998

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 32-1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies, Inc. on Form
10KSB/A for the Fiscal Year ended 8/31/04 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sam Gottfried, Chief Executive
Officer  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10KSB/A  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10KSB/A  fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April  27 , 2005

Name  /s/ Sam Gottfried (CEO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that  appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NoFire Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NoFire Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Roberto Rodriguez, Respondent-Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[943 NYS2d 94]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stall-man, J), entered October 12, 2011, which granted in part and denied in part defendant New York City Transit Authority’s (NYCTA) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion as to that portion of the complaint found to allege a claim sounding in respondeat superior, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

The claims arise from an incident on a Queens bound “E” subway train, when plaintiff Rodriguez, while intervening on behalf of a woman being menaced by another passenger, alleg*413edly assaulted defendant Johnson, the train’s conductor, now deceased. Plaintiff was charged with assault in the second degree and obstruction of governmental administration in the second degree, but acquitted of all criminal charges.

Plaintiff brought this action, alleging false arrest and malicious prosecution against defendant Johnson, and negligent hiring, supervision and retention against his employer, defendant NYCTA. NYCTA moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, arguing that there was no basis for vicarious liability against it, and that plaintiff could not show that it negligently hired, supervised and retained Johnson.

The IAS court disagreed in part, finding that a cause of action for respondeat superior liability could be inferred from the notice of claim and complaint, and that issues of fact existed concerning whether Johnson was acting within the scope of his duties when reporting the alleged assault to police. The IAS court granted NYCTA’s motion to the extent of dismissing the negligent hiring, supervision and retention claim.

The IAS court erred in sustaining a cause of action against the NYCTA predicated on respondeat superior liability. Plaintiffs theory is that Johnson made a false report to the police that plaintiff assaulted him in an effort to improperly receive leave and disability benefits to which he was not entitled. An employee’s conduct in allegedly seeking to defraud NYCTA of leave time and benefits cannot be reasonably viewed as actions within the scope of employment or in furtherance of NYCTA’s interests *(Danner-Cantalino v City of New*York, 85 AD3d 709, 710 [2011]).

We agree with the IAS court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs negligent hiring, retention, and supervision claim. The motion court properly concluded that there was no actual evidence that the NYCTA knew or should have known of a propensity on the part of Johnson to engage in the conduct alleged to have caused injury here *(see e.g. Coffey v City of New*York, 49 AD3d 449 [2008]).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Renwick and Richter, JJ. [Prior Case History: 33 Mise 3d 1206(A), 2011 NY Slip Op 517950J).]