alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Amendment to the 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Amendment to 
 Zebra Technologies Corporation 
 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan 
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS 
 This Amendment hereby amends the outstanding Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement(s) relating to non-qualified stock options granted to the Participant under the 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, to ensure
that those options qualify as stock rights that are exempt from Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, by adding the following paragraph at the end of the Agreement(s): 
 “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or in the Plan, in no event shall the Change in Control Price for any Option Shares that
became vested after December 31, 2004, or are covered by an Option that was granted after December 31, 2004, exceed the Deal Price, or if there is no Deal Price, the closing price on the day of the Change in Control. “Deal Price”
shall mean the consideration paid for Company Common Stock in a tender or exchange offer or Corporate Transaction that constituted the Change in Control. The Company and the Participant intend that the Option will qualify as stock rights that are
exempt from Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the Option shall be construed and administered accordingly.” 
 Executed on this      day of December, 2008. 
  

					
	 ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
	 		 	Participant
			
	  
	 		 	  

	 <<Officer and Title>>
	 		 	<<Name>>

  

 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research: Aberdeen, ID
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Aberdeen, Idaho Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research People & Locations







Rose A Wride
                        Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (208) 510-6737
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Fauzan FASYA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-72435.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 19, 2011.

*124Albert C. Lum, Sr., Esquire, Law Office of Albert C. Lum, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner.

Richard Zanfardino, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Cac-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-fevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fauzan Fasya, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Fasya established he suffered past persecution when he witnessed two Chinese people being beaten. *See Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003). Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that, even as a member of a disfavored group of Chinese Indonesians, Fasya has not established a well-founded fear of future persecution because there is no evidence that he faces an individualized risk of harm. *Cf. Sael v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 922, 925 (9th Cir.2004); *see Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 1173, 1179 *125(9th Cir.2007) (en banc). Accordingly, Fasya’s asylum claim fails.

Because Fasya failed to meet the lower burden of proof for asylum, it follows that he has not met the higher standard for withholding of removal. *See Ze-hatye,*453 F.3d at 1190.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Fasya failed to establish it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if returned to Indonesia. *See Wakkary v. Holder, 558*F.3d 1049, 1067-68 (9th Cir.2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### EDINS V. LOEB.

(Decided April 12th, 1910.)

Appeal from Elmore Chancery Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Whiteside.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Zoom Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:

1)

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)

The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 11, 2009



| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/ Robert A. Crist    
| | Name:  | Robert A. Crist        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                          75,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  595,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,255
<INVENTORY>                                    549,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,271,425
<PP&E>                                       1,751,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                 783,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,787,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,052,380
<BONDS>                                        679,652
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,117,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,787,664
<SALES>                                      6,328,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,434,525
<CGS>                                        6,140,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,874
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 92,980
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             86,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
AO 91 (Rev 1 I/I I) Criminal Complaint 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

United States of America 

V. 

EUGENE JAMES HOLBERT II, a/k/a "G.G." 

and 

JAMAR SCHABASS HOLBERT, a/k/a "Meez" 

Defendant(s) 

for the 

District of Oregon 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 

'14-MJ-106 

I, the complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

/ .- .;z__ 

On or about the date(s) of July 31, 2014 in the county of Multnomah in the 

District of ___ O_re~g~o_n __ ~ , the defendant(s) violated: 

Code Section Offense Description 

21U.S.C.841(a)(1), 841 (b)(1)(B) Distribution of Cocaine and Cocaine Base, and Possession with the Intent to 

Distribute Cocaine and Cocaine Base 

21 u.s.c. 846 Conspiracy to Distribute Cocaine 

18 U.S.C. 922(g) Felon in Possession of a Firearm 

This criminal complaint is based on these facts: 

See attached Affidavit of Travis Law, FBI Metro Gangs Task Force Officer 

tif Continued on the attached sheet. 

I 

Travis Law, Task Force Officer 

Printed name and title 

Sworn to before me and signed in my presence. 

Date: ,1.1~~ /) )l)'j 

City and state: Portland, Oregon 

Case 3:14-mj-00106 Document 1 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Isaiah C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 859]

*618Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about August 25, 2011, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree and resisting arrest, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The fact-finding determination was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. When court officers attempted to subdue and arrest appellant’s companion following a courtroom disruption, appellant aggressively confronted the officers, approaching them in a belligerent manner with raised hands despite their repeated directives to stay away, and intentionally sought to interfere with the officers’ performance of their duties. Appellant’s interference was not merely verbal. Instead, his actions and words, taken together, constituted a sufficient intrusion into the police activity to establish obstructing governmental administration *(see Matter of Davan L.,*91 NY2d 88 [1997]; *People v Romeo,*9 AD3d 744, 745 [2004]). Appellant’s struggle to avoid being lawfully arrested for obstructing governmental administration constituted resisting arrest. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 160 (Monday, August 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 47094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17998]



[[Page 47094]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Public Availability of the Department of Energy's Service 
Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Management, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of public availability of FY 2019 Service Contract 
Inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act of 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) is 
publishing this notice to advise the public on the availability of the 
FY 2019 Service Contract Inventory and Analysis Plan and FY 2018 
Service Contract Inventory Analysis. This inventory provides 
information on service contract actions over $150,000 that DOE 
completed in FY 2019. The inventory has been developed in accordance 
with guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). FY 2019 government-wide service 
contract inventory can be found at https://www.acquisition.gov/service-contract-inventory. The Department of Energy's service contract 
inventory data is included in the government-wide inventory posted on 
the above link and the government-wide inventory can be filtered to 
display the inventory data for the Department. DOE has posted its FY 
2018 Inventory Analysis and FY 2019 Analysis Plan at: https://energy.gov/management/downloads/service-contract-inventory.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Barry E. Ross in the Strategic 
Programs Division at 202-287-1552 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d193b0a3a3a8ff83bea2a291b9a0ffb5beb4ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8dcfecfffff4a3dfe2fefecde5fca3e9e2e8a3eae2fb">[email protected]</span></a>.

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on August 3, 
2021, by John R. Bashista, Director, Office of Acquisition Management, 
pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That 
document with the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For 
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of 
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal 
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the 
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document 
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the 
Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021-17998 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report of CHS Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K/A-2 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Schmitz,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ John Schmitz
------------------
John Schmitz
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed August 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00688-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

KEMONE RODGERS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA16-18372-G

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

Before the Court is the State’s motion to dismiss the State’s appeal. We grant the motion, 

and we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

190688F.U05

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

No. 05-19-00688-CR V.

KEMONE RODGERS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court 

No. 6, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA16-18372-G.

Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle, 

Justices Myers and Molberg participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 7th day of August, 2019.
April 10, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FREDERIC JARDIN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00616

- CV V.

SOREN MARKLUND, DOUG LAS WENE AND CHEM32, LLC , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , Soren Marklund, Douglas Wene and Chem32, LLC, signed June 19, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We do not have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal . We therefore order the appeal DISMISSED

. We order appellant Frederic Jardin to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
to Registration Statement No. 33-91716 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 of Nextel
Communications, Inc., Registration Statement No. 333-06521 of Nextel
Communications, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-06523 of Nextel
Communications, Inc. on Form S-8, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-26369 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 of Nextel Communications, Inc.,
Registration Statement No. 333-42537 of Nextel Communications, Inc. on Form S-8,
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-53429 of Nextel
Communications, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-68382 of Nextel
Communications, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-69312 of Nextel
Communications, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-37102 of Nextel
Communications, Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-1290 of
Nextel Communications, Inc. on Form S-4 of our report dated March 19, 2002,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nextel Communications, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2001.


McLean, Virginia
March 29, 2002
#### Frank Tricarico Contractors, Inc., Appellant, v City of New Rochelle, Respondent.

[941 NYS2d 248]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered December 28, 2010, which denied its motion for summary judgment on the second cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract, and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss, as time-barred, the second cause of action.

*693Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the second cause of action, to recover damages for breach of contract, was time-barred because it was not commenced during the one-year period of limitation set forth in section 127 of the City Charter of the City of New Rochelle. Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the period of limitation began to run when its damages became ascertainable, which occurred in this case on or before the date on which the plaintiff filed its initial notice of claim alleging the same breach as is alleged in the second cause of action *(see C.S.A. Contr. Corp. v New York City School Constr. Auth.,*5 NY3d 189, 192 [2005]; *D & L Assoc., Inc. v New York City School Constr. Auth.,*69 AD3d 435 [2010]; *New York City School Constr. Auth. v Rallen & Lemelson,*290 AD2d 497 [2002]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on its second cause of action, and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss that cause of action as time-barred.

In light of our determination, the plaintiffs remaining contentions have been rendered academic. Rivera, J.E, Leventhal, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 158 (Thursday, August 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46754-46755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17774]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Open Meeting of the Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides updated videoconference links for the 
U.S. Department of the Treasury's Federal Advisory Committee on 
Insurance (FACI) meeting on Thursday, September 9, 2021 from 11:00 
a.m.-1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The meeting is open to the public.

[[Page 46755]]


DATES: The meeting will be held via videoconference on Thursday, 
September 9, 2021, from 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jigar Gandhi, Senior Insurance 
Regulatory Policy Analyst, Federal Insurance Office, U.S. Department of 
the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Room 1410 MT, Washington, DC 
20220, at (202) 622-3220 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons who 
have difficulty hearing or speaking may access this number via TTY by 
calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice in the Federal Register on 
August 11, 2021 (86 FR 44139), the Department announced the September 
9, 2021 videoconference meeting of the FACI. That notice inadvertently 
included inoperable hyperlinks that are corrected by this notice.
    The meeting will be held via videoconference and is open to the 
public. The public can attend remotely here: http://www.yorkcast.com/treasury/events/2021/09/09/faci. The webcast will also be available 
through the FACI's website: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-markets-financial-institutions-and-fiscal-service/federal-insurance-office/federal-advisory-committee-on-insurance-faci. For more 
details about the meeting, see the August 11, 2021 notice.

    Dated: August 16, 2021.
Steven Seitz,
Director, Federal Insurance Office.
[FR Doc. 2021-17774 Filed 8-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P