alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED APRIL 3, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Amounts  inapplicable  or not  disclosed as a separate  line on the Statement of
Operations are reported as herein.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                     0001000227
<NAME>                                    TB WOOD'S CORPORATIONS & SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            Jan-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              Apr-03-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1.000
<CASH>                                              1,481
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      22,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                          489
<INVENTORY>                                        27,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   52,020
<PP&E>                                             49,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (26,170)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     91,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              21,473
<BONDS>                                            27,921
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               58
<OTHER-SE>                                         25,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       91,788
<SALES>                                            36,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   36,346<F1>
<CGS>                                              22,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       8,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     3,971
<INCOME-TAX>                                        1,588
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 2,383
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        2,383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.40
<FN> 
Revenues are reported net of credits in the Statement of Operations
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.8




AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

TO THE

DIRECTORS’ PHANTOM SHARE PLAN




Adopted by the Board of Directors on September 18, 1995

Amended and restated by the Board of Directors as of December 2, 2003

Replaced by Outside Director Phantom Share Plan effective January 1, 2005





THIS AMENDMENT is made this 9th day of December, 2008, by Goodrich Corporation (hereinafter
referred to as the “Company”);



W I T N E S S E T H




WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Directors’ Phantom Share Plan, as approved by the Board of
Directors on September 18, 1995, amended and restated by the Board of Directors as of December 2,
2003 and replaced by the Outside Director Phantom Share Plan effective January 1, 2005 (hereinafter
referred to as the “Plan”); and



WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company has maintained the right
to amend the Plan from time to time;



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has taken action authorizing this Amendment to
the Plan; and




NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



Effective January 1, 2005, the following paragraph shall be added to the Plan as the
penultimate paragraph of the Plan and shall read as follows:




“FURTHER RESOLVED, that notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan herein to the
contrary and, to the extent applicable, the Plan shall be interpreted, construed and
administered (including with respect to any amendment, modification or termination of the
Plan) in such manner so as to comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any related Internal Revenue Service guidance
promulgated thereunder.”



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized officer, has caused this Amendment to
be executed as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	GOODRICH CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROOSE VELT FRANCOIS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 1393

[ August 10, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Jack B. Tuter , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16

- 005249CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig

, Senior Assistant Atto rney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C IKLIN and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0574 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0574

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the submission of nominal catch statistics by Member States fishing in the North-East Atlantic (codified version) (COM(2006)0497 - C6-0301/2006 - 2006/0164(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 317 E , 23/12/2006 P. 0600 - 0601 *

20061223

P6_TA(2006)0574

Submission of nominal catch statistics by Member States fishing in the North-East Atlantic (codified version) ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the submission of nominal catch statistics by Member States fishing in the North-East Atlantic (codified version) (COM(2006)0497 — C6-0301/2006 — 2006/0164(COD))

(Codecision procedure — codification)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0497) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0301/2006),

- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts [2],

- having regard to Rules 80, 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0460/2006);

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1290 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1290

                     For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 9, 1997

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Saeed Rezai 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Saeed Rezai as provided 
in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer 
to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year the total number 
of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005287EN.01000601.xml

| 18.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/6

---

Annual Report 2004

(2005/C 287/07)

The European Ombudsman has presented his Annual Report for the year 2004 to the European Parliament, in accordance with Article 195(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3(8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the performance of the Ombudsman's Duties.

The Annual Report as well as a shorter version containing only the Executive Summary and the Statistics are available on the European Ombudsman's website in all 20 official languages at: http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int.

Paper copies of these publications can be requested free of charge from the European Ombudsman's office:

| 1, Avenue du Président Robert Schuman |
| --- |
| B.P. 403 |
| FR-67001 Strasbourg Cedex. |
| Tel. (33-3) 88 17 23 13 |
| Fax (33-3) 88 17 90 62 |
| E-mail: euro-ombudsman@europarl.eu.int |

1, Avenue du Président Robert Schuman

B.P. 403

FR-67001 Strasbourg Cedex.

Tel. (33-3) 88 17 23 13

Fax (33-3) 88 17 90 62

E-mail: euro-ombudsman@europarl.eu.int

---
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1608

To provide for budgetary reform by requiring the reduction of the deficit,

a balanced Federal budget, and the repayment of the national debt.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 4, 1998

Mr. ALLARD (for himself and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4,

1977, as modified by the order of April 11, 1986, to the Committees on

the Budget, and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one committee reports, the other committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

A BILL

To provide for budgetary reform by requiring the reduction

of the deficit, a balanced Federal budget, and the repayment of the national debt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Debt Repay5 ment Act’’.
2

•S 1608 RIS

1 SEC. 2. BALANCED BUDGET REQUIREMENT.

2 Beginning with fiscal year 1999 and for every fiscal

3 year thereafter, budgeted outlays shall not exceed budg4 eted revenues.

5 SEC. 3. REDUCTION OF NATIONAL DEBT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning with fiscal year 1999

7 and for every fiscal year thereafter, actual revenues shall

8 exceed actual outlays in order to provide for the reduction

9 of the gross Federal debt as provided in subsection (b).

10 (b) AMOUNT.—The amount of reduction required by

11 this subsection shall be equal to the amount required to

12 amortize the debt over the next 30 years in order to repay

13 the entire debt by the end of fiscal year 2029.

14 SEC. 4. WAIVER.

15 Congress may waive the provisions of this Act for any

16 fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in effect.

17 SEC. 5. MAJORITY REQUIREMENT FOR REVENUE IN18 CREASE.

19 No bill to increase revenues shall be deemed to have

20 passed the House of Representatives or the Senate unless

21 approved by a majority of the total membership of each

22 House of Congress by a rollcall vote.

23 SEC. 6. REVIEW OF REVENUES.

24 Congress shall review actual revenues on a quarterly

25 basis and adjust outlays to assure compliance with this

26 Act.
3

•S 1608 RIS

1 SEC. 7. DEFINITION.

2 In this Act—

3 (1) the term ‘‘revenues’’ shall include all reve4 nues of the United States excluding borrowing; and

5 (2) the term ‘‘outlays’’ shall include all outlays

6 of the United States excluding repayment of debt

7 principal.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Perry McDowell, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 153]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J), rendered April 27, 2006, as amended May 26, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the second and third degrees and sexual abuse in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s legal sufficiency arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence. We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. Although the victim was mentally incapacitated, she was able to describe conduct by defendant constituting penetration *(see*Penal Law § 130.00 [1]). There was ample evidence satisfying the corroboration requirement set forth in Penal Law § 130.16 that applies where lack of consent results from incapacity *(see e.g. People v Novak,*212 AD2d 740, 741 [1995], *lv denied*85 NY2d 941 [1995]).

The court providently exercised its discretion in determining that the probative value of the challenged testimony by the victim’s mother and teacher was not outweighed by the potential for prejudice or the arousal of sympathy. Their *475testimony about the victim’s mental and physical disabilities was highly relevant to assist the jury in evaluating the victim’s testimony *(see People v*Parks, 41 NY2d 36, 47 [1976]). The court also properly permitted the mother to testify about family background matters that were relevant to complete the narrative of events and provide context for other testimony *(see e.g. People v Milhouse,*246 AD2d 119, 122 [1998]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.
(17 Misc. Rep. 307)

#### READ v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

June 30, 1896.)

Evidence—Documents—Subscribing! Witness.

An application for insurance is not admissible in an action on the policy, where the application shows on its face a subscribing witness, and his death is not claimed, nor his absence accounted for.

Appeal from trial term.

Action by Mary Read against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Judgment was entered on a verdict directed by the court in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before VAN WYCK, C. J., and CONLAN and O’DWYER, JJ.

Arnoux, Ritch & Woodford, for appellant.

Max Altmayer, for respondent.

CONLAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon a verdict directed by the court. The action is upon a life insurance policy issued by the defendant February 20, 1893, upon the life of one Edward O’Neill in favor of the plaintiff. The making and issuing of the policy, the payment of the premiums, and the death of the insured are admitted. The appellant relies upon exceptions taken at the trial. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, counsel for the defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that the proofs of death had not been served on the company as required by the policy. This motion was opportune and well taken, as the case then stood; but the court, in the exercise of its discretion, allowed the plaintiff to reopen her case and supply the proof. We think the proof subsequently introduced made out a prima facie case, and the motion was properly denied. The application was properly excluded. The application on its face shows a subscribing witness. His death is not claimed, nor is his absence accounted for. The statute clearly shows or points the way to prove an instrument authenticated by a subscribing witness. This method was not employed. On the contrary, the defendant introduced one of its employés, who testified that he was familiar with the issuing of policies on applications presented to the company, and that the policy in question was issued on the application offered in evidence. This was not enough. It was incumbent on the defendant to show that the application offered was not only the application on which the policy issued, but that it was the application made by the insured for the issuance of the policy. The testimony of the plaintiff before the coroner as to the insured’s health presented a question that might have been submitted to the jury, but the defendant’s counsel did not ask to go to the jury on the question of fact, contenting himself to rest his case on his* motion to dismiss.

We think the motion for a direction was properly granted, and fihe judgment is affirmed, with costs. All concur.
### NUMBER 13

- 1 9

- 00 342

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF A.P. AND A.V. , CHILDREN

On Appell ee ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief

.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Be navides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights

. The brief of appellee,

the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, is due to be filed on August 20,

2019

. Appell ee has filed a motion seeking fifteen days of additional time to file the brief

.

Appellee represents that appellant do es not oppose the extension

.

Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the

rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals, but include additional expedited

deadlines and procedures. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 28.4; T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6.2(a). The

inte rmediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “ as far as reasonably possible ” that2

these appeals are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of

appeal is filed. See T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6.2(a). Given the nature of these cases and

the shortened appellate deadlines , it is the policy of this Court to limit extensions of time

to file a brief in such cases to one extension absent truly extraordinary circumstances.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 38.6(d).

Accordingly, w e GRANT appell ee ’s motion for extension of time and ORDER

appellee’s brief to be filed on or before Wednesday

, September 4 , 201 9 . No further

extensions of time will be granted absent truly exigent an d extraordinary circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Order d elivered and filed the

16th day of August, 2019

.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form [10-Q] for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal Financial
Officer) of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their
knowledge and belief: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.


                  /s/ Austin L. Roberts, III
                  ------------------------------------
                  Austin L. Roberts, III, Chief Executive Officer


                  /s/ Richard C. Abbott
                  ------------------------------------
                  Richard C. Abbott, Treasurer

August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,438,319
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,554,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (204,790)
<INVENTORY>                                    314,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,535,897
<PP&E>                                       2,211,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                (871,147)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,100,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,595,198
<BONDS>                                        775,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       201,436
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,683,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,100,586
<SALES>                                     15,082,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,082,742
<CGS>                                        4,295,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,130,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                976,242
<INCOME-TAX>                                    65,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            911,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   911,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-73550) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan of
Wolverine Tube, Inc.; (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-73490)
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors of Wolverine
Tube, Inc.; and, (iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-87687)
pertaining to the Savings Plan of Wolverine Tube, Inc. of our report dated
February 5, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Wolverine Tube, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1998.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Wolverine Tube,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Birmingham, Alabama
March 25, 1999