alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                        FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert B. Pollock, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: March 29, 2004

                                                   /s/ Robert B. Pollock
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Robert B. Pollock
                                                   President and Chief Executive
                                                   Officer
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL LR 83-11(b) Page 1 of 1

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: crowell@kite.com

CROWELL LAW

P.O. Box 923

Salem, OR 97308

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOE, a/k/a IP 67.168.196.52

Defendant.

 Case No.: 3:13-cv-00839-AA

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL

LR 83-11(b)

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL

Pursuant to Local Rule 83-11(b) notice is provided of the withdrawal of Jonathan T. van 

Heel, OSB No. 095349, formerly of Crowell Law. 

Carl D. Crowell remains counsel of record for plaintiff. 

DATED: July 15, 2013

Of attorneys for the plaintiff

/s/ Carl D. Crowell

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

crowell@kite.com

Crowell Law

(503) 581-1240

Case 3:13-cv-00839-AA Document 12 Filed 07/15/13 Page 1 of 1 Page ID#: 50
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1816 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1816

            To suspend temporarily the duty on halofenozide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 1998

  Mr. Specter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on halofenozide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DUTY SUSPENSION ON HALOFENOZIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.29.29      Benzoic acid, 4-                                                                         
                        chloro-,2 benzoyl-                                                                      
                        2-(1,1-                                                                                 
                        dimethylethyl)                                                                          
                        hydrazide (CAS                                                                          
                        No. 112226-61-6)                                                                        
                        (provided for in                                                                        
                        subheading                                                                              
                        2928.00.25)......  Free         No change         No change         On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/2000            
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1757

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the program of research

on breast cancer.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 13, 1998

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mr. D’AMATO) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and

Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the

program of research on breast cancer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Re5 search Extension Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM OF RESEARCH ON

7 BREAST CANCER.

8 Section 417B(b)(1) of the Public Health Service Act

9 (42 U.S.C. 286a–8(b)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 1757 IS

1 ‘‘(1) BREAST CANCER.—For the purpose of car2 rying out section 417(c), there is authorized to be

3 appropriated $650,000,000 for fiscal year 1999, and

4 such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal

5 years 2000 through 2003.’’.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock Behavior Research: West Lafayette, IN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area West Lafayette, Indiana Livestock Behavior Research People & Locations







Kaitlin  Wurtz
                        Livestock Behavior Research

                        




                        
                        Research Animal Scientist
                        Phone: (765) 494-6358
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)
                            ProjectsInstitutional Biological Safety Committee (IBC) Agreement - Purdue University
                                                    Non-Funded Cooperative Agreement
                                                                    (N)Accession Number: 442029


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-311-CR

NO. 2-09-312-CR

NO. 2-09-313-CR

NO. 2-09-314-CR

LEMUEL JOSEPH YOUNG	APPELLANT

A/K/A JADERRIUS NEIL YOUNG

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Lemuel Joseph Young, also known as Jaderrius Neil Young, pled guilty to four offenses of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon.  The trial court found him guilty and sentenced him to life imprisonment in each case, with the sentences to run concurrently.

	Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  In the brief, counsel avers that, in his professional opinion, these appeals are frivolous.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the records demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief.3  Appellant also filed a pro se response to the Anders brief, challenging the voluntariness of his pleas and alleging ineffective assistance of his trial counsel.  We note that there is no reporter’s record of the guilty plea hearing and that no motion for new trial appears in the clerk’s records.4

	After an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record to see if there is any arguable ground that may be raised on his behalf.5  Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.6

	Because Appellant entered an open plea of guilty in each case, our independent review for potential error is limited to potential jurisdictional defects, the voluntariness of his pleas, error that is not independent of and supports the judgments of guilt, and error occurring after entry of the guilty pleas.7

	We have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief, Appellant’s response, and the appellate records.  We agree with counsel that these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the appellate records that arguably might support the appeals.8  Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgments.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  August 12, 2010
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Lloyd R. Cunningham. Trustee v. Unlimited Recharge Inc. and Carlos

Gomez

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00036

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 65188

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion requesting that this Court stay this appeal until

March 22 , 201 9 pending the trial court’s ruling on appellant’ s motion for reconsideration. The

motion to stay is GRANTED. It is further ordered that the appeal is abated until March 22, 2019. Appellant is directed to notify this Court by March 22, 2019 of either the trial court’s ruling or

whether the motion has not been ruled upon by that date.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signatur e:

____

/s/ Justice Sara h Beth Landau

______ Acting individually

Date: _ February 12, 2019

__
1 

Order on Joint Mot. to Dismiss 

Case No. 3:15-cv-787 

CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO 

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

LINDSAY L. CLAYTON 

Trial Attorney, Tax Division 

U.S. Department of Justice 

P.O. Box 683 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

201-307-2956 

202-307-0054 (Fax) 

Lindsay.L.Clayton@usdoj.gov 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

WP HOLDINGS, LLC, an Oregon limited 

liability company, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by 

and through the Internal Revenue Service, 

 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________ 

Case No.: 3:15-cv-787

ORDER GRANTING 

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS 

 

Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation and Motion to Dismiss, and for good 

cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that this case is dismissed 

with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), with each party to bear its own costs and fees. 

Dated this 15th day of September, 2015. 

/s/ Michael H. Simon_______________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:15-cv-00787-SI Document 8 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Joseph Azzu et al., Appellants, v Samuel Sherman et al., Respondents. (And Another Title.)

—In a medical malpractice action, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), dated October 12, 1984, as, upon the defendants’ motion to sanction the plaintiffs for failure to make disclosure in accordance with a prior order of the same court, granted the same to the extent of precluding the plaintiffs from offering any evidence at trial with respect to a certain X ray.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, with costs, and defendants’ motion denied.

The evidence before Special Term was insufficient for it to conclude reasonably that the plaintiffs had willfully and contumaciously failed to comply with its prior discovery order. It was therefore an abuse of discretion for Special Term to impose the sanction of preclusion for nondisclosure *(see, Donner v 50 Tom Corp.,*99 AD2d 504). Plaintiffs’ attorneys claimed that the missing X ray was never in their possession. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
(8 App. Div. 618)

#### WHITE et al. v. HALL et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 31, 1896.)

Change of Venue—Convenience of Witness—Affidavit.

Moving affidavit is insufficient where it merely states that affiant expects to prove certain things, and not that he can prove them.

Appeal from special term, Hew York county.

Action by Samuel White and others against Edwin M. Hall and others to recover chattels. From an order denying a motion to change the place of trial from the county of Hew York to the county of Tompkins, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before BARRETT, RUMSEY, PATTERSOH, and INGRAHAM, JJ.

Tompkins & Cobb, for appellant Hull and others.

Halliday & Denton, for appellant First Hat. Bank.

James L. Baker, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The rule that an application of this kind cannot be granted without an affidavit of merits in proper form is too well settled to be now questioned. The affidavit of merits submitted by the defendants in this action was clearly insufficient, and for that reason the motion below was properly denied. The moving affidavit of Henry L. Clark was also insufficient in that it states that he expects to prove certain things by witnesses, and not that he can prove them. See McPhail v. Ridout, 83 Hun, 446, 31 N. Y. Supp. 934; Thurfjell v. Witherbee, 70 Hun, 401, 24 N. Y. Supp. 278. We do not wish to be understood as passing upon the merits of this application, and this decision is without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at special term upon proper affidavits.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, without prejudice to another application upon new papers.
Exhibit
23.2




INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Synergx Systems Inc on Form S-8, File No. 333-107231 of our report dated
December 26, 2007 with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of Synergx Systems Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended September
30, 2007, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Synergx Systems Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended September 30,
2008.
 
 /s/
Marcum & Kliegman LLP
 
 Marcum
& Kliegman LLP
 New York,
New York
 January
5, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1447 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1447

       To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 1997

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new item:

      

``    9902.32.34     Benzenesulfonic                                                                            
                      acid, 2-amino-5-                                                                          
                      nitro-,                                                                                   
                      monoammonium                                                                              
                      salt (CAS No.                                                                             
                      4346-51-4)                                                                                
                      (provided for in                                                                          
                      subheading                                                                                
                      2921.42.90.00)..  Free              No change        No change        On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/2000            
                                                                                                              ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10 (eee)


                                                                             463
<PAGE>

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$70,405.31
April 8, 1998
Toms River, New Jersey

      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Louis V. Sanzaro, 1497 Lakewood Road, Toms River, New
Jersey 08755 (the "Maker"), promises to pay, on or before September 5, 1998, to
the order of The Tirex Corporation, 740 St. Maurice, Suite 201, Montreal, Quebec
H3C 1L5 (the "Payee"), the principal sum of seventy thousand, four hundred five
dollars and thirty-one cents (US $70,405.31) at the offices of the Payee,
together with interest on the unpaid principal balance at the annual rate of 8%
over the Prime Rate charged by Citibank, NA as at such date, unless prepaid at
the Payee's election.

      Payment of all sums hereunder shall be made in lawful money of the United
States of America, which payment shall be applied first to payment of accrued
interest and then to the reduction of the unpaid principal balance hereunder. A
certificate from the Payee of this Note shall be prima facie proof of the
principal balance due hereunder.

      Upon default, the whole sum of principal and interest shall become due
immediately at the option of the holder. Default shall include, but not be
limited to, the failure of the Maker to pay the interest or principal when due.
Failure at any time to exercise any of the rights and remedies of the Payee
hereunder shall not constitute a waiver thereof, nor shall it be a bar to
Payee's exercising any other rights and remedies at that time, or at a later
time.

      This Note is secured by a security and pledge agreement, of even date
herewith, between the Maker and Payee (the "Security Agreement") pursuant to
which Maker has granted Payee a security interest in a certain stock certificate
representing 400,000 shares of the common stock of the Maker to be issued
forthwith to the Payee ("Collateral"). In the event of default by the Maker of
its obligations under this Note, the Payee shall have any and all rights
respecting the Collateral as set forth in the said Security Agreement.

      If any one or more of the provisions of this Note shall, for any reason,
be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, in whole or in part, or in any
respect, or if any one or more of the provisions of this Note would operate to
invalidate this Note, then, in any such event,


                                                                             464
<PAGE>

such provision or provisions shall only be deemed null and void and shall not
affect any other provision of this Note, and the remaining provisions of this
Note shall remain operative and in full force and effect, and in no way shall be
affected, prejudiced or disturbed thereby. This Note shall be construed under
the laws of the State of Delaware.

                                                 /s/ Louis Sanzaro
                                             ----------------------------
                                                     Louis Sanzaro


                                                                             465
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

BERNITA FRITZ 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

Defendant. 

MARSH, Judge 

Case No. 3:14-cv-00888-MA 

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

On August 11, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulated Application 

for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 

U.S.C. § 2412(d), in which the parties agree that plaintiff should 

be awarded fees in the amount of $4,292.47. See Stipulated Motion 

for EAJA Fees (ECF No. 21). 

Accordingly, based on the agreement of the parties, it is 

hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $4,292.47 shall 

be awarded to plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice 

Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. There are no costs or expenses. The parties 

agree that attorney fees will be paid to plaintiff's attorney, 

subject to verification that plaintiff does not have a debt which 

1 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

Case 3:14-cv-00888-MA Document 23 Filed 08/17/15 Page 1 of 2
qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the 

Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. 

Ct. 2521 (2010). 

If plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made 

out to plaintiff's attorney, Merrill Schneider, at Mr. Schneider's 

address: P.O. Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. If plaintiff has a 

debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the 

debt shall be made out to plaintiff and mailed to plaintiff's 

attorney's office at the address stated above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this __i!/_ day of AUGUST, 2015. 

Malcolm F. Marsh 

United States District Judge 

2 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

Case 3:14-cv-00888-MA Document 23 Filed 08/17/15 Page 2 of 2