alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
      on
      Form S-3 (No. 333-125671, 333-75275, 333-38230, 333-132803 and 333-140107 ) and
      Form
      S-8 (333-116072) of
      Columbia Laboratories, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2007 relating to
      our
      audits of the consolidated financial statements, which includes an explanatory
      paragraph stating that we did not audit the adjustments relating to the
      correction of errors, and our report dated March 15, 2007 relating to our audits
      of the financial statement schedule, which appear in this Annual Report on
      Form
      10-K of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
      2007.





/s/
      Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP





**GOLDSTEIN
      GOLUB KESSLER LLP**


New
      York,
      New York





March
      25,
      2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EUGENE DIVISION 

Catherine D.,1 

Plaintiff, 

VS. 

COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

AIKEN, District Judge: 

Case No. 6:15-cv-00288-AA 

ORDER 

It is hereby ORDERED that attorneys' fees in the amount of $15,056.17 are 

awarded to Plaintiffs attorney pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The Court has 

reviewed the proceedings and the amount of fees sought pursuant to Gisbrecht v. 

I 

Barnhardt, 535 U.S. 789, 807-08 (2002), and the factors identified in Crawford v.

Astrue, 586 F.Sd 1142, 1151-52 (9th Cir. 2009), and finds that this is a reasonable fee 

1 In the interest of privacy, this opinion uses only the first name and the initial of the last 

name of the non-governmental party or parties in this case. 

Page 1- ORDER 
in light of the circumstances of the case. Plaintiff has been awarded attorney fees in 

the amount of $3,660.92 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 

28 U.S.C. § 2412. When issuing the section 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiffs 

attorney, the agency is directed to subtract the amount paid under the EAJA and 

send Plaintiffs attorneys the balance, minus any applicable processing fees as 

allowed by statute. 

ifv' ✓

Dated this::;- d�y of February 2020. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

Page 2 - ORDER
#### In the Matter of Rasheid B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 473]

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about October 6, 2011, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the first and second degrees, attempted assault in the first degree, assault in the second *574degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, with no credit for time served, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of crediting appellant with time served in detention prior to the dispositional order, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The evidence established that appellant used force to retain stolen property.

We find the length of the placement excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Acosta, Freedman and Román, JJ.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Sam Kraynek, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                                     
|----- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: |  | August 14, 2007                     
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Sam Kraynek                     
|      |  | Sam Kraynek, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.31





KONTOOR BRANDS 401K SAVINGS PLAN
KONTOOR BRANDS, INC. AUTHORIZED OFFICER’S RESOLUTIONS 
AMENDMENT NO.  1
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section XV-1 of the Kontoor Brands 401k Savings Plan (the “Plan’’), Kontoor Brands, Inc., a North Carolina corporation (the “Company”), has reserved the right to amend or modify the Plan from time to time, by action of its authorized officer; and
WHEREAS, the Kontoor Brands, Inc. Retirement Plans Committee (the “Committee”) is the plan administrator of the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to (i) change eligibility requirements for the Plan and (ii) change administration of the limits under Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section XIV-2 of the Plan, the Company has delegated to its Vice President- Chief Human Resources Officer the authority and responsibility to perform, undertake, decide and implement the Company’s “settlor’’ functions and decisions with respect to and under the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section I-14 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end thereof:
For purposes of Basic Contributions only, the limit under Section 401(a)(17)(B) of the Code provided in the previous sentence (“Compensation Limit”) shall be determined by multiplying the Compensation Limit for the applicable calendar year by the maximum percentage of Earnings a Participant is permitted to defer under Section IV-1.
FURTHER RESOLVED: The first paragraph of Section II-2 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
An individual who was a Participant in the Plan on December 31, 2019 will, except as otherwise provided in this Section II, continue to be a Participant.  Effective January 1, 2020, each other eligible employee of a Participating Employer shall be eligible to become a Participant in the Plan as of the first day of the month following the date the Participant is hired by a Participating Employer.
FURTHER RESOLVED: The foregoing discretionary amendment to the Plan shall be effective on January 1, 2020.
FURTHER RESOLVED: The provisions of the Plan are hereby modified to conform with this Plan Amendment, but in all other respects the provisions of the Plan are to be and shall remain in full force and effect.
FURTHER RESOLVED: The Committee shall be, and hereby is, authorized and directed to take such action as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out and implement this Plan Amendment and these resolutions.
FURTHER RESOLVED: All of the acts of the officers and employees of the Company and the members and representatives of the Committee, whether heretofore or hereafter taken or done, which are in conformity with the purposes and intent of these resolutions shall be, and the same hereby are, in all respects ratified, approved and confirmed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these Authorized Officer’s Resolutions to be executed by its duly authorized officer on December 18, 2019. 
KONTOOR BRANDS, INC.


By:    /s/ Scott Shoener
Scott Shoener
Vice President - Chief Human Resources Officer
REVERSE AND REMAND and Opinion Filed February 1, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-18-00484-CV ATKINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant V. MARY LUTTRELL, Appellee On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 84376 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, J ustice Whitehill, and Justice Molb erg Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion requesting that w e reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this case to the trial court for a new tria l. We grant the motion, reverse the trial court’s default judgment, and remand this case for a new trial. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).

180484F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

ATKINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant
No. 05-18-00484-CV V. MARY LUTTRELL, Appellee On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court, Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 84376. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the defa ult judgment of the trial court
is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the trial court for a new trial. The parties shall bear their ow n costs of this appeal as agreed

. Judgment entered February 1, 2019
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Environmentally Integrated Dairy Management Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center Environmentally Integrated Dairy Management Research People





- Find a Person
- Find a Location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Matt Akins
- Meridith Anderson
- Lisa Bauman
- Robin Brewster
- Tucker Burch
- Rachel Cook
- Joseph Hattamer
- Joseph Heffron
- David Jaramillo
- Robin Ogden
- Sarah Opelt
- Jessica Sherman
- Eric Young

Meridith  Anderson    Biological Science Lab Technician **Meridith Anderson** Environmentally Integrated Dairy Management Research Biological Science Lab Technician meridith.anderson@usda.gov


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DONALD AMONSON, 

Plaintiff, 

Case No. 6:14 CV 1531-TC 

v. 

ORDER 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on October 26, 

2015. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual 

findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 

1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and 

Recommendation. 

Dated this d (\()day of December, 2015. 

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge 

Order -- Page 1 

Case 6:14-cv-01531-TC Document 17 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 1
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1655

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanone.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-

phenyl-1-propanone.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new item:

‘‘ 9902.32.24 2-hydroxy-2-methyl1-phenyl-1-propanone

(CAS No. 7473–98–

5) (provided for in

subheading

2914.40.40) ............. Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2000 ’’.
2

•S 1655 IS

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by this

2 section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Albany, California
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Sylvia  Abolencia
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Administrative Assistant
                        Phone: (510) 559-6090
                        
                        
                        Fax: (510) 559-5989(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EMILY GARCIA 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN COLVIN, Commissioner, 

Social Security Administration 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 3:15-CV-00352-KI 

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY 

FEES PER 28 USC 2412(d) 

It is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412, an attorney fee in the amount of $5,917.71 is awarded to Plaintiff. It is 

ordered that the attorney fee will be paid to Plaintiffs attorney, dependent upon 

verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 

2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made payable to 

Plaintiff's attorney, George J. Wall, and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's mailing address 

at: 1336 E. Burnside St., Suite 130, Portland OR 97132. If Plaintiff has such debt, then 

the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to 

Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's mailing address stated above. 

Page 3 - PETITION FOR EAJA FEES 

Case 3:15-cv-00352-KI Document 20 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 2
IT IS SO ORDERED this __ day of ______ , 2016. 

Proposed Order submitted: 

Geor J. Wall, 

gwall@eastpdxlaw.com 

Phone No.: 503-236-0068 

Fax No.: 503-236-0028 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Emily Garcia 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: April 27, 2016 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Plaintiffs PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF 

FEES PER EAJA and PROPOSED ORDER were filed with the Clerk of the Court on 

April 27, 2016, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: 

Heather L. Griffith heather.griffith@ssa.gov, OGC.Seattle.ECF@ssa.gov 

Janice E Hebert Janice.Herbert@usdoj.gov, trudylee.fleming@usdoj.gov, 

Jan.Sands@usdoj.gov, laura.franzen@usdoj.gov 

Page 4 - PETITION FOR EAJA FEES 

George . all, B No. 934515 

1336 E. urnside St. , Suite 130 

Portland OR 97214 

Telephone: (503)236-0068 

Fax: (503)236-0028 

gwall@eastpdxlaw.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Emily Garcia 

Case 3:15-cv-00352-KI Document 20 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Houston, Texas
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Houston, Texas People & Locations







Fida  Bacha

                                                                (PhD)
                        Houston, Texas

                        




                        
                        Nutrition Scientist
                        Phone: (713) 798-7166
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1802

To authorize appropriations for the Surface Transportation Board for fiscal

years 1999, 2000, and 2001.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 19, 1998

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.

LOTT, Mr. FORD, and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Surface Transportation

Board for fiscal years 1999, 2000, and 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Surface Transpor5 tation Board Reauthorization Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION LEVELS.

7 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sur8 face Transportation Board $16,190,000 for fiscal year
2

S 1802 IS

1 1999, $16,642,000 for fiscal year 2000, and $17,111,000

2 for fiscal year 2001.

Æ
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.11b





HORACE MANN SERVICE CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN


SCHEDULE A PARTICIPANTS


	
			
	NAME OR TITLE
	 
	EFFECTIVE DATE OF

	 
	 
	PARTICIPATION*

	 
	 
	 

	TIER I PARTICIPANTS

	President and CEO
	 
	May 16, 2013

	 
	 
	 

	TIER II PARTICIPANTS

	EVP and CFO
	 
	May 23, 2017

	EVP, Distribution & Business Strategy
	 
	February 15, 2012

	EVP, Property & Casualty and Life & Retirement
	 
	July 1, 2015

	EVP, Supplemental & Operations
	 
	August 15, 2019

	 
	 
	 

	TIER III PARTICIPANTS

	 
	 
	 

	*Subject to acceptance within 30 days of effective date of participation.






Last updated:  April 6, 2020