alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northwest Watershed Research Center: Boise, ID
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Scientific Products
                        Publications
                                    Models
                                    Published Datasets
                                    Snow Pack Reports
                    Reynolds Creek
                        Watershed Description
                                    Data AccessSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Boise, Idaho Northwest Watershed Research Center People & Locations







David  Huber
                        Northwest Watershed Research Center

                        




                        
                        Research Affiliate
                        Phone: (208) 422-0713
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARTHA ECHEVERRY , Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE ASSET

- BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006

- 3 , Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3611

[ November 15, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Joel T. Lazarus, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE08001920 (11)

.
Martha Echeverry, Pembroke Pines, pro se.

Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale; Kimberly S. Mello and Julie A. Girard of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
We affirm the order directing the clerk to issue the certificate of title to appellee at the end of this mortgage foreclosure proceeding. Appellant’s clai m that the order was void as a result of the automatic stay of bankruptcy

, after the filing of her seventh petition for bankruptcy

, is without merit. Because she did not file her bankruptcy petition until after issuance of the certificate of sale of the p roperty, her right of redemption had terminated and her interest in the property was already extinguished. See § 45.0315

, Fla. Stat

. (2014) ; Household Fin

. & Mortg

. Co. v. Osta

, 862 So. 2d 885 , 886 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , G ROSS and T AYLOR , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1551 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 605
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1551

              For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 1997

Mr. Torricelli introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 24, 1998

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
              For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMIGRATION AND 
              NATIONALITY ACT.

    (a) In General.--In the administration of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, Kerantha Poole-Christian shall be classified as a 
child within the meaning of section 101(b)(1)(E) of such Act, upon 
approval of a petition filed on her behalf by Clifton or Linette 
Christian, citizens of the United States, pursuant to section 204 of 
such Act.
    (b) Limitation.--No natural parent, brother, or sister, if any, of 
Kerantha Poole-Christian shall, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 605

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1551

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

              For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 24, 1998

                       Reported without amendment`
Opinion issued February 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00667-CV

———————————

IN RE MATTHEW G. DILICK, EAST BISSONET LTD., EAST BISSONET

GP, INC., AND FLAT STONE II LTD., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators Matthew G. Dilick, East Bissonet Ltd., East Bissonet GP, Inc., and 

Flat Stone II Ltd. filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial 

court’s denial of their Motion to File Third Party Petition and Designate 

Responsible Third Parties and their Motion for Severance.1

 1 The underlying case is Cohen v. Dilick, cause number 2010-20973, pending in the 

234th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Wesley Ward

presiding.
2

Attorneys for real-party-in-interest Prosperity Bank, successor in interest to 

Community National Bank,2 has provided the Court with a signed copy of an 

Agreed Mutual Notice of Non-Suit with Prejudice. Real-party-in-interest 

represents “all issues between the parties” have been resolved, rendering this 

mandamus proceeding moot. 

On January 16, 2015, the Court notified the parties to this original 

proceeding of its intent to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. No response has been 

received from the parties, and more than ten days has passed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.3. In light of the parties’ settlement, this original proceeding is dismissed for 

lack of jurisdiction, with each party to bear their own costs. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.

 

2 Prosperity Bank is an intervenor in the trial-court proceedings.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Coastal Plain Soil, Water and Plant Conservation Research: Florence, SC
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Mission
                    Outreach
                        Activities for studentsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Florence, South Carolina Coastal Plain Soil, Water and Plant Conservation Research People & Locations







William  Reid

(Liam)
                        Coastal Plain Soil, Water and Plant Conservation Research

                        




                        
                        BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1999             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                    1,693,643                 592,547
<SECURITIES>                                      0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 6,000                 177,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,773,750                 937,415
<PP&E>                                    4,604,954               3,824,721
<DEPRECIATION>                           (1,540,965)            (1,027,307)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            4,837,739               3,734,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       434,739                  87,943
<BONDS>                                           0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                       0
<COMMON>                                    143,600                 143,600
<OTHER-SE>                                4,068,463               3,237,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              4,837,739               3,734,829
<SALES>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          3,868,600               3,801,050
<CGS>                                             0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          3,051,998               2,359,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,356,687               1,635,421
<INCOME-TAX>                                526,043                 571,958
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         830,644               1,063,463
<DISCONTINUED>                              (33,516)                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                       0
<CHANGES>                                         0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                830,644               1,063,463
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .06                     .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .06                     .07



</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1173 TP 13-00534** 
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF EDDIE ORTIZ, PETITIONER,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHARLES KELLY, JR., SUPERINTENDENT, MARCY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENTS.

EDDIE ORTIZ, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [Bernadette T. Clark, J.], entered February 7, 2013) to review a determination finding after a tier II hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal insofar as it concerns the declaratory judgment action is unanimously dismissed, the determination is confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this hybrid CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action, seeking to challenge the determination, following a tier II disciplinary hearing, that he violated inmate rule 106.10 ( see 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [7] [i] [refusal to obey orders]). Supreme Court sua sponte dismissed the declaratory judgment causes of action in the complaint and transferred the CPLR article 78 proceeding to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), to review a question of substantial evidence.

We note at the outset that the appeal must be dismissed insofar as it concerns the court’s sua sponte dismissal of the declaratory judgment causes of action ( see Mohler v Nardone , 53 AD3d 600, 600). No appeal lies as of right “from an ex parte order, including an order entered sua sponte” ( Sholes v Meagher , 100 NY2d 333, 335; see Obot v Medaille Coll. , 82 AD3d 1629, 1630, appeal dismissed 17 NY3d 756), and permission to appeal has not been granted ( see CPLR 5701 [c]).**-2- 1173 TP 13-00534** 

Contrary to petitioner’s contention with respect to the CPLR article 78 proceeding, the determination is supported by substantial evidence. We reject petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer erred in refusing to permit him to present evidence concerning his allegedly valid excuse for failing to obey the correction officer’s order. The reason for the order is “irrelevant to the issue of his guilt or innocence” ( Matter of Washington v Napoli , 73 AD3d 1300, 1300). Indeed, “ ‘[t]he risks inescapably attendant on the refusal of an inmate to carry out even an illegal order of a correction officer are such as to require compliance at the time’ ” the order is given ( Matter of Roman v Coughlin , 202 AD2d 1000, 1001, quoting Matter of Rivera v Smith , 63 NY2d 501, 515; see Matter of Hogan v Fischer , 90 AD3d 1544, 1545, lv denied 19 NY3d 801).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions with respect to the CPLR article 78 proceeding, and we conclude that they are without merit.

Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1820 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1820

         To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 1998

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 4-HEXYLRESORCINOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.29.07      4-Hexylresorcinol                                                                        
                        (CAS No. 136-77-                                                                        
                        6) (provided for                                                                        
                        in subheading                                                                           
                        2907.29.90)......  Free         No change         No change         On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/2001            
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel GONZALEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10249.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 16, 2007.*

Filed April 18, 2007.

Mark Wayne Reeves, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yuma, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Anders V. Rosenquist, Jr., Esq., Rosenquist & Associates, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Joel Gonzalez-Hernandez, Florence, AZ, pro se.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joel Gonzalez-Hernandez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence imposed for importation of 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gonzalez-Hernandez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Because our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Gonzalez-Hernandez knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

The appeal is DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  Exhibit 3.1.1




                          NORTH AMERICAN DATACOM, INC.

                                   AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


         Pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
North American Datacom, Inc. adopts the following Amendment to its Certificate
of Incorporation:

         The following amendment was adopted on March 10, 2000. Such amendment
was adopted by a vote of the shareholders owning a majority of the
Corporation's issued and outstanding shares of common stock pursuant to Section
228 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Notice of the adoption of the
amendment has been given to all shareholders in accordance with Section 228(d)
of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

AMENDMENT

         Article IV of the Certificate of Incorporation is amended to read as
follows:

         The authorized capital stock of the Corporation shall consist of
150,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value, and 10,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $0.0001 par value.

                                    NORTH AMERICAN DATACOM, INC.


                                    By
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                          Robert Crawford, President
Date: March 10, 2000



                                     - 1 -
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Stoneville, Mississippi
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Calvin  Roberson
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Helper
                        Phone: (662) 686-5247
                        
                        
                        Fax: (662) 686-9406(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov