alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Commodity Protection and Quality Research
                                    Water Management Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research People & Locations







Diana  Perez
                        Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (559) 596-2823
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Gregory J. Dawson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky Bancshares,
Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and


5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.
Date:    May 14, 2007
BY  /s/ Gregory J. Dawson
Gregory J. Dawson
Chief Financial Officer

21
Lexlibrary/197885.1
#### In the Matter of Roberta A. Berkeley, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 294]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 5, 2011, which ruled, among other things, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a housekeeper for a department store for approximately 3V2 years. She received a number of warnings concerning her frequent absences. After claimant failed to report to work for three consecutive days in July 2010 without authorization, her employment was terminated for excessive absenteeism. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct. She now appeals.

We affirm. We note that continued absenteeism, despite prior warnings, has been held to constitute misconduct disqualifying a claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits *1329
      *(see Matter of Goodridge [Commissioner of Labor],*65 AD3d 1415, 1416 [2009]; *Matter of Cuillo [Commissioner of Labor],*37 AD3d 896, 897 [2007]). It is undisputed that claimant was absent without authorization numerous times prior to her discharge and was repeatedly warned about her continued absences. Claimant offered many different excuses for her failure to report to work during the time period in question but did not produce any medical proof at the hearing that she was unable to report due to health problems, which presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Miller [Commissioner of Labor],*9 AD3d 567, 568 [2004]). In view of the foregoing, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision and we decline to disturb it.

Peters, EJ., Spain, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 31.1
 Certifications
 SECTION 302
 
 I, Frank D. Puissegur, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American Commerce Solutions, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 **AMERICAN COMMERCE SOLUTIONS, INC.**Date: October 15, 2004
By:
/s/ Frank D. PuissegurFrank D. PuissegurTitle: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Director
EXHIBIT 10.1
 





 


November 25,
2008


 


[Investor
name]


[Investor
address]


 


Subject:                                                     Side Letter Agreement to the Purchase
Agreement between Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. and the investors
signatory thereto, dated June 25, 2008.


 


Dear
investor:


 


This
Side Letter Agreement entered into on November 26, 2008, by and between
Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. and the investors signatory to the
Purchase Agreement, dated June 25, 2008 (the “Purchase Agreement”), will
serve to modify Section 1of the Purchase Agreement. Capitalized terms used
herein which are not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as those
given to them in the Purchase Agreement.


 


The
definition of “Amendment” included in Section 1 of the Purchase
Agreement is hereby modified as follows:


 


“Amendment”
means an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Organization implementing a
one-for-twenty-five reverse split of the Company’s Common Stock and maintaining
the number of authorized shares of Common Stock at 50,000,000.


 


No other terms, rights or provisions of the Purchase Agreement are or should be considered to have been modified by the terms of this Side Letter Agreement and each party retains all other rights, obligations, privileges and duties contained in the Agreement.
 
Agreed and Accepted on November 25, 2008:


 


Very
truly yours,


 


Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.


 


Name:
Richard E. Forkey


 


	
  /s/
  Richard E. Forkey

  	
   

  
	
  Name:
  Richard E. Forkey

  
	
  Title:
  President and Chief Executive

  
	
  Officer

  
	
   

  
	
  November 25,
  2008

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  



 

















 


 


Agreed
to and Accepted by:


 


Special
Situations Fund III QP, L.P.


 


	
  /s/
  Austin W. Marxe

  	
   

  



Name:  Austin W. Marxe


Title:
General Partner


 


	
   

  	
   

  



Date


 


Special
Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P.


 


	
  /s/
  Austin W. Marxe

  	
   

  



Name:  Austin W. Marxe


Title:
General Partner


 


	
   

  	
   

  



Date


 


	
  /s/
  Arnold Schumsky

  	
   

  



Name:  Arnold Schumsky


 


	
  November 25,
  2008

  	
   

  



Date


 


2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR homepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research People





- NCAUR Home Page
- MPM Home Page
- Personnel Listing

Christine  Poppe    Physical Science Technician /ARSUserFiles/51079/Christine.jpg
 Phone: (309) 681-6298Fax: (309) 681-6672Room 1129USDA ARS NCAUR1815 N University St.Peoria IL 61604
 Christine Poppe is a technician working with Dr. Susan McCormick. She is from Central Illinois and received her Bachelors and Masters degrees in Biological Sciences from Illinois State University studying the long- and short-term effects of increased reproductive effort on shaping, evolutionarily, the optimal clutch size in passerine birds. Christine started at NCAUR in 2015.   PublicationsNo publications listed for this employee.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Varsity Bus Co. et al., Appellants, v New York City Department of Education et al., Respondents.

[944 NYS2d 125]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered September 13, 2011, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, granted defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied as moot plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and reinstating the complaint, granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as against defendant Department of Education (DOE); and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The contracts between the parties pertaining to transportation of students provided that plaintiff bus companies are entitled to compensation in the amount of 85% of their daily rate for any “ ‘regularly scheduled school days’ on which the Chancellor or his designee(s) shall order . . . pupils not to be in attendance for any reason.” The contracts further defined a “regularly scheduled school day” as “any day on which schools are scheduled to be open in accordance with the official [DOE] Calendar as originally adopted and published annually and prior to amendment thereof.” September 8, 2009, was a regularly *624scheduled school day pursuant to the originally adopted 2009-2010 calendar which had it slated to be the first day of the school year. Subsequently, the calendar was revised or amended to provide for school to begin one day later, on September 9, 2009. Under the plain language of the contract, this amendment triggered the provision requiring plaintiffs to receive 85% of their daily rate for September 8, 2009.

However, plaintiffs’ argument that the court should have granted their motion for leave to amend the complaint to add three additional plaintiffs is without merit. The proposed plaintiffs filed notices of claim more than three months after their claims for payment were denied *(see*Education Law § 3813 [1]). Consequently, the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient as a matter of law *(see Buchanan v Beacon City School Dist.,*79 AD3d 961, 962-963 [2010]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Renwick, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 32437(U).]
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1552

To provide for the conveyance of an unused Air Force housing facility in

La Junta, Colorado, to the City of La Junta.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To provide for the conveyance of an unused Air Force housing facility in La Junta, Colorado, to the City of La

Junta.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, AIR FORCE HOUSING FA4 CILITY, LA JUNTA, COLORADO.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the

6 Air Force shall convey, without consideration, to the City

7 of La Junta, Colorado (in this section referred to as the

8 ‘‘City’’), all right, title, and interest of the United States

9 in and to the unused Air Force housing facility, consisting
2

•S 1552 IS

1 of approximately 28 acres and improvements thereon, lo2 cated within the southern most boundary of the City.

3 (b) PURPOSES OF CONVEYANCE.—The purposes of

4 the conveyance under subsection (a) may include (among

5 any other purposes) the following:

6 (1) To assist the City to relieve the housing

7 shortage in the La Junta area.

8 (2) To provide a location for the provision of

9 early childhood education services.

10 (3) To provide additional dormitory space for

11 Otero Junior College.

12 (4) To provide a source of funds for capital im13 provements to the existing dormitory on the campus

14 of Otero Junior College.

15 (c) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage

16 and legal description of the property to be conveyed under

17 subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory

18 to the Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be borne

19 by the City.

20 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The

21 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi22 tions in connection with the conveyance under subsection

23 (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the

24 interests of the United States.

Æ
EXHIBIT
99.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report
of Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives (the Company), on
Form 10-K/A for the year ending August 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John Schmitz, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the
Company.

> /s/ John
> SchmitzJohn SchmitzExecutive Vice
> President and Chief Financial Officer June 27,
> 2003

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives and will be retained by Cenex Harvest
States Cooperatives and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon
request.



---
#### In the Matter of Roger Bates, Petitioner, v New York State Policemen’s and Firemen’s Retirement System, Respondent.

— Casey, J.

Petitioner, a police officer in the Village of Port Chester, Westchester County, investigated a car fire in the course of his duties on June 12, 1982. While pushing back a crowd of people as the vehicle that was on fire started to explode, he "slipped on gasoline that was coming from the lower portion of the vehicle”, injuring his back and leg. Thereafter, petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement was denied. Petitioner’s CPLR article 78 proceeding to review this determination was transferred to this court by Special Term.

Following the decision of the Court of Appeals in *Matter of McCambridge v McGuire*(62 NY2d 563), this court was advised by letter dated August 1, 1986 that respondent had reconsidered its position and stipulated that petitioner suffered an "accident” within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 363. Accordingly, respondent offered to refer petitioner’s application to the medical board for a determination as to whether petitioner was actually disabled. It was conceded, however, that petitioner had already been granted retirement for disability incurred in the performance of duty (Retirement and Social Security Law § 363-c).

The issue in this proceeding as to whether petitioner was injured in an accident was, therefore, mooted and respondent *277declined to submit a brief. Petitioner has requested that the proceeding be heard.

A court will review a moot question only if there is shown (1) a likelihood of repetition, (2) a phenomenon typically evading review, and (3) a showing of significant questions not previously passed on, i.e., a substantial and novel issue *(Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714-715). Inasmuch as each “accident” must be decided on the facts and not as a matter of law, it must be concluded that review here is not appropriate under the standards set in *Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne (supra).*Our remittal to the Comptroller in *Matter of Rowe v Regan*(107 AD2d 967) clearly indicates that we did not intend that each injury caused by a slip in the course of duty does not equal an “accident”, as petitioner contends. The proceeding must be dismissed as moot.

Proceeding dismissed, as moot, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.