alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF WOLVERINE TUBE, INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF WOLVERINE
TUBE, INC. AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,967
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     73,525
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,825
<PP&E>                                         150,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 397,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,162
<BONDS>                                        100,473
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,000
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   397,020
<SALES>                                        699,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               699,863
<CGS>                                          606,157
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  606,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,375
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,792
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,583
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.77
<FN>
<F1>The values for the tags Receivable and PP&E are shown net of their respective
allowance accounts.
</FN>


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eclipsys Corporation
(the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
Paul L. Ruflin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert J. Colletti,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Dated: August 9, 2004
    
    /s/ Paul L. RuflinPaul L. RuflinChief Executive OfficerDated: August 9, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert J. CollettiRobert J. CollettiChief Financial Officer
#### WARD v. PETRIE et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

December 26, 1895.)

1. Fraud—Conveyance to Hinder Collection oe Debt.

An action to recover damages sustained by fraud may be maintained against a mortgagor and mortgagee where the mortgage was executed to hinder and delay collection of a debt of the mortgagor.

2. Same—Action by Receiver in Supplementary Proceedings.

A receiver in supplementary proceedings may sue the debtor and one to whom he executes a mortgage for the purpose of hindering and delaying' collection of the mortgagor’s debt.

Appeal from Jefferson county court.

Action Tby Peter A. Ward, appointed, in supplementary proceedings, receiver of Norman Petrie, against said Petrie and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

Wayland F. Ford, for appellants.

Rogers & Atwell, for respondent.

HARDIN, P. J.

The jury. Were instructed that, unless fraudulent intent was found to exist on the part of both defendants, the mortgage should be found to be valid. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding that the mortgage was fraudulent as to both mortgagor and mortgagee, and made to hinder and delay the collection of the debt represented by the plaintiff, as receiver. Billings v. Russell, 101 N. Y. 227, 4 N. E. 531; Baldwin v. Short, 125 N. Y. 553, 26 N. E. 928; Plow Co. v. Wing, 85 N. Y. 421. We think the plaintiff, as receiver, was in position to attack the mortgage. Code, § 2469 ; Alden v. Clark, 86 Hun, 357, 33 N. Y. Supp. 454; Stephens v. Perrine, 143 N. Y. 482, 39 N. E. 11. The action was to recover damages sustained by fraud. Oil Co. v. Everest, 30 Hun, 586; Quinby v. Strauss, 90 N. Y. 664; Murtha v. Curley, Id. 372; Pilcher v. Levino, 80 Hun, 399, 30 N. Y. Supp. 314; Mandeville v. Avery, 124 N. Y. 377, 26 N. E. 951. We think none of the exceptions taken upon the trial present an error requiring us to interfere with the verdict.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grain Legume Genetics Physiology Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pullman, Washington Grain Legume Genetics Physiology Research People & Locations







Nickisha  Pierre-Pierre
                        Grain Legume Genetics Physiology Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (509) 335-9521
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)
                            **Publications**
                                                (Clicking on the reprint icon
                                                    Reprint Icon
                                                    will take you to the publication reprint.)Exploring the mycovirus SsHADV-1 as a biocontrol agent of Sclerotinia white mold

- (Peer Reviewed Journal)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
- 1

- IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS

NO. 01-14-00865 HARRY W. STURGES, IV, APPELLANT

V. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., APPELLEE
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. One (1)

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-0071918

APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL HARRY W. STURGES, IV, Appellant, through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Motion to Dismiss Appeal, and in support thereof, respectfully represents: 1. Harry W. Sturges, IV, Appellant, and Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., Appellee, have entered into a Settlement Agreement resolving their differences. 2. This Settlement Agreement has been approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, in the case styled In re Harry Wilton Sturges, IV , 12-34249. The Court entered an Order approving the Settlement Agreement on January 7, 2015. 3. Accordingly, as all differences between the parties have been amicably resolved, Appellant hereby requests that this Court enter an order dismissing the Appellant’s appeal in the above-captioned matter. WHEREFORE, Appellant respectfully requests that this Court enter an order dismissing this case and granting such other and further relief as is equitable and just. ACCEPTED 01-14-00865-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/28/2015 10:47:39 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK- 2

- January 28, 2015. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Patrick D. Devine Patrick D. Devine State Bar No. 05662200 Law Office of Patrick D. Devine 8300 FM 1960 West, Suite 450 Houston, Texas 77070 Phone: 832-251-2722 Fax: 866-488-1082 Email: pdevine@pdevinelaw.com Attorney for Harry W. Sturges, IV

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true copy of the foregoing pleading has been sent by telephonic document transfer before 5:00 p.m. of the recipient's local time to (1) Israel Saucedo, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, PC, Parkway Office Center, Suite 900, 14160 North Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas 75254, at Facsimile 214-635-2686; (2) Rex L. Kesler, 2311 Canal Street, Suite 304, Houston, TX 77003 at Facsimile 281-501-3191; and (3) Mitchell J. Buchman, Battett Daffin Frappier Turner, 1900 St. James Place, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77056 at MitchelB@bdfgroup.com on the 28th day of January, 2015.

/s/ Patrick D. Devine Patrick D. Devine Attorneys for Harry W. Sturges, IV
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23


              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-73550) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan of
Wolverine Tube, Inc.; (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-73490)
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors of Wolverine
Tube, Inc.; and, (iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-87687)
pertaining to the Savings Plan of Wolverine Tube, Inc. of our report dated
February 5, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Wolverine Tube, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1996.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Wolverine Tube,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.



                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Birmingham, Alabama
March 21, 1997
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sam KraynekChief Executive OfficerAugust 16, 2010
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0578 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0578

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation adapting Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector and Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union (COM(2006)0677 - C6-0424/2006 - 2006/0226(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 317 E , 23/12/2006 P. 0603 - 0603 *

20061223

P6_TA(2006)0578

Direct support schemes under CAP; the COM for sugars; restructuring of the sugar industry; owing to the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation adapting Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector and Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union (COM(2006)0677 — C6-0424/2006 — 2006/0226(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2006)0677) [1],

- having regard to Article 4(3) of the Treaty of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania and Article 41, second subparagraph, and Article 20 of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, in conjunction with Annex IV thereto, pursuant to which it has been consulted by the Council (C6-0424/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A6-0412/2006);

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in the OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PHILIP W. MCCLURE, 

Case No. 6:13-cv-00744-BR 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JEFF PREMO, Superintendent, 

Oregon State Penitentiary, 

Respondent. 

BROWN, Judge. 

ORDER 

Petitioner, an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary, 

brings this habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Currently before the Court is Petitioner's Motion for Voluntary 

Dismissal Without Prejudice (#33). 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion is GRANTED, and this 

action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ~f"'-" 

1 - ORDER -

day of June, 2014. 

ANNA United ~ States District Judge 

Case 6:13-cv-00744-BR Document 34 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 1
© seage Orter For (0697)

United States District Court, Northern District of Mlinois

Name of Assigned Judge Sitting Judge if Other
or Magistrate Judge James B. Moran than Assigned Judge
CASE NUMBER 03 CR 991-1 DATE 5/18/2004
CASE USA vs. CARLTON McINTOSH
TITLE
[In the following box (a) indicute the party filing the motion, ¢., plaintiff, detendunt, 3rd purty plaintiff, nd (b)stute briefly the nature
MOTION: of the motion being presented.)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DOCKET ENTRY:

eo) a Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]

(2) oO Brief in support of motion duc

GB) oO Answer brief to motion duc. _. Reply to answer brief due__

(4) Oo Ruling/Hearingon eset for at

(5) im Status hearing{held/continued to) [set for/re-set for] on _ set for at

(6) g Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for] on _ set for __ at .

(7) o Trialfset for/re-sct for] on _at_, :

(8) a [Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continued to _at

(9) Oo This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agteement/pursuant to]

OFRCP4(m) C] Local Rule 41.1. O FRCP41(a)(1) O FRCP41(a)(2).

(10) «x (Other docket entry] Enter Memorandum Opinion And Order. Defendant has moved to exclude
various records purportedly generated at the Salvation Army Community Correctional Center in Chicago,
for now, the motion is denied. The government moves to exclude evidence relating to a discipline
hearing, that motion is denied, for now.

al) @f [For further detail sce order attached to the original minute order.]

No notices required, advised in open court. 7
No notices requited,

Notices mailed by judge's staff.

Notified counsel by telephone.

Y | Docketing to mail notices,

Mail AO 450 form. 1429 Laisi¢ $°9
Copy to judge/magistrate judge. wag

date willed notion
courtroom

depuly's
initials

92:5 Hd OL Avisnagz

Date/jime reecived in
cen 's cf
=

LG

mailing depury initials



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA »)
)

vs. ) No. 03 CR 991
)
CARLTON McINTOSH, }
)
)

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Defendant has moved to exclude various records purportedly generated at the Salvation
Army Community Correctional Center in Chicago. He recognizes that business records are
generally admissible but contends these are inadmissible because they are untrustworthy and
contain inadmissjble self-serving statements. But that is a matter best decided at trial. The
government must lay a proper foundation, and if it fails to do so, if the records are
untrustworthy or contain inadmissible information, then they will not be admitted. But for
now, the motion is denied.

The government moves to exclude evidence relating to a discipline hearing, It may well
be, as the government contends, that the results of that hearing are untrustworthy and should
not be admitted. But again, that is a matter that can best be determined at trial, which after

all, is a bench trial. That motion is, for now, denied.

c JAMES B. MORAN
Sehior Judge, U. S. District Court

4

Mos 12,2004.
Exhibit 32-1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies,
Inc. on Form 10KSB for the Fiscal Year ended 8/31/06 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Gottfried, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10KSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: December 11,2006 , 2006

Name  /s/ Sam Gottfried (CEO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
 the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to NoFire Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by NoFire
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.







Exhibit 32-2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies,
Inc. on Form 10KSB for the Fiscal Year ended 8/31/06 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Oolie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and


(2) The information contained in the Form 10KSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: December 11,2006

Name  /s/ Sam Oolie (CFO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to NoFire Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by NoFire
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

     In connection with the Annual Report of Realmark Property Investors Limited
Partnership - VI A (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.




     March 31, 2006                              /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
     --------------                              --------------------
           Date                                  Joseph M. Jayson
                                                 Individual General Partner and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer