Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Notices 47617 

15See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

16 Id. 

17 Id. 

18See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

19For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

20See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Japan: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of 

Critical Circumstances, 81 FR 53409 (August 12, 

2016). 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Where the respondent reported 

reliable entered values, we calculated 

importer—(or customer-) specific ad 

valorem rates by aggregating the 

dumping margins calculated for all U.S. 

sales to each importer (or customer) and 

dividing this amount by the total 

entered value of the sales to each 

importer (or customer).15 Where 

Commerce calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin by dividing the 

total amount of dumping for reviewed 

sales to that party by the total sales 

quantity associated with those 

transactions, Commerce will direct CBP 

to assess importer—(or customer-) 

specific assessment rates based on the 

resulting per-unit rates.16 Where an 

importer—(or customer-) specific ad 

valorem or per-unit rate is greater than 

de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), 

Commerce will instruct CBP to collect 

the appropriate duties at the time of 

liquidation.17 Where an importer—(or 

customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.18

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

methodology described in the ‘‘Rates for 

Non-Examined Companies’’ section, 

above. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by NSC, Tokyo Steel, or the 

non-examined companies for which the 

producer did not know that its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.19

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rates for the 

companies listed in these final results 

will be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margins established in the 

final results of this review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment in which the 

company was reviewed; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 5.58 percent,20 the 

all-others rate established in the LTFV 

investigation. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5) of 

Commerce’s regulations. 

Dated: August 20, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Application of Partial Facts Available and 

Use of Adverse Inference 

V. Final Determination of No Shipments 

VI. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

VII. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Deduct Section 232 Duties From U.S. 

Price 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Adverse Facts Available to NSC’s 

Home Market Sales Made to Certain 

Affiliated Customers 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Differential Pricing Methodology 

With Zeroing Negative Margins for Sales 

That Pass Commerce’s Differential 

Pricing Test 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Certain Separately Invoiced U.S. 

Revenue Fields in Calculating the Net 

U.S. Price 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Make Certain Adjustments to NSC’s 

Reported G&A Expenses 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–18414 Filed 8–25–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 8, 2021, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the initiation and preliminary 

results of a changed circumstances 

review (CCR) of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on certain frozen warmwater 

shrimp (shrimp) from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam). For 

these final results, Commerce continues 

to find that Camimex Group Joint Stock 

Company is the successor-in-interest 

(SII) to Camau Frozen Seafood 

Processing Import Export Corporation, 

in the context of the AD order on 

shrimp from Vietnam. 

DATES: Applicable August 26, 2021. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
47618 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Notices 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 70 FR 5152 

(February 1, 2005) (Order). 

2See Camimex Group Joint Stock Company’s 

Letter, ‘‘Request for Changed Circumstances 

Review,’’ dated June 3, 2021. Camimex Group Joint 

Stock Company also requested that Commerce 

conduct an expedited initiation and preliminary 

results of the CCR, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3)(ii). 

3 Id. at 4–10. 

4See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Initiation 

and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review, 86 FR 36091 (July 

8, 2021) (CCR Initiation and Prelim). 

5See CCR Initiation and Prelim, 86 FR at 36092. 

6On July 6, 2021, Commerce revised the HTS 

subheadings within the scope of the Order based on 

a request received from U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP). See Memorandum, ‘‘Request from 

Customs and Border Protection to Update the ACE 

AD Case Reference File,’’ dated July 6, 2021 

(ACCESS Barcode 4139823–01). 

7 ‘‘Tails’’ in this context means the tail fan which 

includes the telson and the uropods. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik or Samuel Glickstein, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6905 or 

(202) 482–5307, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 2, 2021, Camimex Group 

Joint Stock Company requested that, 

pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 19 

CFR 351.216, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3), 

Commerce conduct a CCR of the Order 1

to confirm that Camimex Group Joint 

Stock Company is the SII to Camau 

Frozen Seafood Processing Import 

Export Corporation and, accordingly, to 

assign it the cash deposit rate of its 

predecessor.2 In its request, Camimex 

Group Joint Stock Company stated that 

it undertook a legal name change from 

Camau Frozen Seafood Processing 

Import Export Corporation, but the 

company is, otherwise, unchanged.3

On July 8, 2021, Commerce initiated 

a CCR and preliminarily determined 

that Camimex Group Joint Stock 

Company is the SII to Camau Frozen 

Seafood Processing Import Export 

Corporation.4 In the CCR Initiation and 

Prelim, we provided all interested 

parties with an opportunity to 

comment.5 However, we received no 

comments. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is certain frozen warmwater shrimp. 

The product is currently classified 

under the following Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

item numbers: 0306.17.0004, 

0306.17.0005, 0306.17.0007, 

0306.17.0008, 0306.17.0010, 

0306.17.0011, 0306.17.0013, 

0306.17.0014, 0306.17.0016, 

0306.17.0017, 0306.17.0019, 

0306.17.0020, 0306.17.0022, 

0306.17.0023, 0306.17.0025, 

0306.17.0026, 0306.17.0028, 

0306.17.0029, 0306.17.0041, 

0306.17.0042, 1605.21.10.30, and 

1605.29.10.10.6 Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and for customs purposes, the written 

product description, provided in the 

Appendix, remains dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

For the reasons stated in the CCR 

Initiation and Prelim, Commerce 

continues to find that Camimex Group 

Joint Stock Company is the SII to Camau 

Frozen Seafood Processing Import 

Export Corporation. As a result of this 

determination and consistent with 

established practice, we find that 

Camimex Group Joint Stock Company 

should receive the cash deposit rate 

previously assigned to Camau Frozen 

Seafood Processing Import Export 

Corporation. Consequently, we will 

instruct CBP to suspend liquidation of 

all shipments of subject merchandise 

exported by Camimex Group Joint Stock 

Company, and entered or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date of this notice 

in the Federal Register at the cash 

deposit rate in effect for Camau Frozen 

Seafood Processing Import Export 

Corporation. This cash deposit 

requirement shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing this determination and 

publishing these final results and notice 

in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) 

and 777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.216(e), 351.221(b), and 

351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: August 20, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix—Scope of the Order 

The scope of the order includes certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp and prawns, 

whether wildcaught (ocean harvested) or 

farm-raised (produced by aquaculture), headon or head-off, shell-on or peeled, tail-on or 

tail-off,7 deveined or not deveined, cooked or 

raw, or otherwise processed in frozen form. 

The frozen warmwater shrimp and prawn 

products included in the scope of the order, 

regardless of definitions in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTS’’), 

are products which are processed from 

warmwater shrimp and prawns through 

freezing and which are sold in any count 

size. 

The products described above may be 

processed from any species of warmwater 

shrimp and prawns. Warmwater shrimp and 

prawns are generally classified in, but are not 

limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some 

examples of the farmed and wild-caught 

warmwater species include, but are not 

limited to, white-leg shrimp (Penaeus 

vannemei), banana prawn (Penaeus 

merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus 

chinensis), giant river prawn 

(Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger 

prawn (Penaeus monodon), redspotted 

shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern 

brown shrimp (Penaeus subtilis), southern 

pink shrimp (Penaeus notialis), southern 

rough shrimp (Trachypenaeus curvirostris), 

southern white shrimp (Penaeus schmitti), 

blue shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western 

white shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis), and 

Indian white prawn (Penaeus indicus). 

Frozen shrimp and prawns that are packed 

with marinade, spices or sauce are included 

in the scope of the order. In addition, food 

preparations, which are not ‘‘prepared 

meals,’’ that contain more than 20 percent by 

weight of shrimp or prawn are also included 

in the scope of the order. Excluded from the 

scope are: (1) Breaded shrimp and prawns 

(HTS subheading 1605.20.10.20); (2) shrimp 

and prawns generally classified in the 

Pandalidae family and commonly referred to 

as coldwater shrimp, in any state of 

processing; (3) fresh shrimp and prawns 

whether shell-on or peeled (HTS subheadings 

0306.23.00.20 and 0306.23.00.40); (4) shrimp 

and prawns in prepared meals (HTS 

subheading 1605.20.05.10); (5) dried shrimp 

and prawns; (6) canned warmwater shrimp 

and prawns (HTS subheading 1605.20.10.40); 

and (7) certain battered shrimp. Battered 

shrimp is a shrimp-based product: (1) That is 

produced from fresh (or thawed-from-frozen) 

and peeled shrimp; (2) to which a ‘‘dusting’’ 

layer of rice or wheat flour of at least 95 

percent purity has been applied; (3) with the 

entire surface of the shrimp flesh thoroughly 

and evenly coated with the flour; (4) with the 

non-shrimp content of the end product 

constituting between four and 10 percent of 

the product’s total weight after being dusted, 

but prior to being frozen; and (5) that is 

subjected to individually quick frozen 

(‘‘IQF’’) freezing immediately after 

application of the dusting layer. When 

dusted in accordance with the definition of 

dusting above, the battered shrimp product is 

also coated with a wet viscous layer 

containing egg and/or milk, and par-fried. 

The products covered by this order are 

currently classified under the following HTS 

subheadings: 0306.17.0004, 0306.17.0005, 

0306.17.0007, 0306.17.0008, 0306.17.0010, 

0306.17.0011, 0306.17.0013, 0306.17.0014, 

0306.17.0016, 0306.17.0017, 0306.17.0019, 

0306.17.0020, 0306.17.0022, 0306.17.0023, 

0306.17.0025, 0306.17.0026, 0306.17.0028, 

0306.17.0029, 0306.17.0041, 0306.17.0042, 

1605.21.10.30, and 1605.29.10.10. These HTS 

subheadings are provided for convenience 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Notices 47619 

8On April 26, 2011, Commerce amended the 

order to include dusted shrimp, pursuant to the 

U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) decision in 

Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United 

States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (CIT 2010) and the 

U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) 

determination, which found the domestic like 

product to include dusted shrimp. See Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, India, the 

People’s Republic of China, Thailand, and the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended 

Antidumping Duty Orders in Accordance with Final 

Court Decision, 76 FR 23277 (April 26, 2011); see 

also Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. 

United States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (CIT 2010); and 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, China, 

India, Thailand, and Vietnam (Investigation Nos. 

731–TA–1063, 1064, 1066–1068 (Review), USITC 

Publication 4221, March 2011. 

1See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 11233 

(February 24, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Bebitz’s Letter, ‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges 

from India: Case Brief,’’ dated April 2, 2021. 

3On April 30, 2021, we rejected Chandan’s case 

brief for relying on untimely-filed new factual 

information (NFI). See Commerce Letter, 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Rejection of New 

Factual Information,’’ dated April 30, 2021. 

Therefore, on May 4, 2021, Chandan refiled its case 

brief after removing the NFI. See Chandan’s Letter, 

‘‘Certain Stainless Steel Flanges from India (A–533– 

877—AR1), Submission of Case Brief for Chandan 

Steel (Refile),’’ dated May 4, 2021. 

4See Pradeep Metals’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Stainless 

Steel Flanges from India (A–533–877—AR1), 

Submission of Case Brief for Pradeep Metals 

Limited,’’ dated April 2, 2021. 5See Balkrishna et al./Bebitz’s Letter, ‘‘Stainless 

Steel Flanges from India: ‘All Other’ Case Brief,’’ 

dated April 2, 2021. 6On July 19, 2021, we rejected the petitioner’s 

rebuttal brief for containing citations to untimelyfiled NFI submitted by Chandan. See Commerce’s 

Letter, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 

of Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Rejection of 

Petitioner’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated July 19, 2021. On 

July 21, 2021, the petitioner refiled its rebuttal brief 

after removing the NFI. See Petitioner’s Letter, 

‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Resubmission 

of Petitioner’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated July 21, 2021. 

7See Hearing Transcript, ‘‘The Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Public Hearing,’’ 

dated May 11, 2021. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from 

India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019,’’ dated June 2, 2021. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from 

India: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated August 

20, 2021 (Issues and Decision Memorandum) which 

is dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice. 

10 Id. 

11 Id. 

12See Preliminary Results (citing Albemarle Corp. 

v. United States, 821 F. 3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016) 

(Albemarle)). 

13See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 3. 

and for customs purposes only and are not 

dispositive, but rather the written description 

of the scope of this order is dispositive.8

[FR Doc. 2021–18368 Filed 8–25–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–877] 

Stainless Steel Flanges From India: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that exporters/ 

producers of stainless steel flanges from 

India made sales at prices below normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

March 28, 2018, through September 30, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable August 26, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benito Ballesteros, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7425. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 24, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 On 

April 2, 2021, we received timely-filed 

case briefs from Bebitz Flanges Works 

Private Limited (Bebitz) 2 Chandan Steel 

Limited (Chandan),3 and Pradeep 

Metals Limited,4 and a joint brief from 

Balkrishna et al. and Bebitz.5 On April 

9, 2021, the petitioner timely filed its 

rebuttal brief.6 On May 11, 2021, 

Commerce held a public hearing, 

limited to the issues raised in the case 

and rebuttal briefs.7 On June 2, 2021, we 

extended the deadline for the final 

results of this review until August 20, 

2021.8 For a complete description of the 

events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.9

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is stainless steel flanges from India. For 

a complete description of the scope of 

this order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.10

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. Attached to this 

notice, in Appendix I, is a list of the 

issues which parties raised. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html/. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties, and for the reasons explained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

we made no changes to the Preliminary 

Results.11

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

In accordance with the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s 

decision in Albemarle,12 Commerce 

continues to assign to the companies not 

individually examined (see Appendix II 

for a full list of these companies) a 

margin of 145.25 percent, which is the 

dumping margin assigned to mandatory 

respondent Chandan. Commerce has 

addressed arguments from various 

interested parties regarding this rate, 

which we assigned to the non-examined 

companies in the Preliminary Results, 

and, for the final results, the 

determination remains unchanged, as 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.13

Final Results of Administrative Review 

We are assigning the following 

dumping margin to the firms listed 

below for the POR, March 28, 2018, 

through September 30, 2019: 

Exporter/producer Dumping margin 

(percent) 

Cash deposit rate 

(adjusted for 

subsidy offsets) 

(percent) 14

Chandan Steel Limited ................................................................................................................................ 145.25 140.38 

Companies Not Individually Examined (excluding Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited) 15 .................... 145.25 140.38 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES