Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 159 / Friday, August 20, 2021 / Notices 46823 

1See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and 

Rescission of Review in Part; 2018–2019, 86 FR 

14873 (March 19, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades 

and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: DSMC’s Case Brief,’’ dated April 22, 2021; 

see also Wuhan Wanbang’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond 

Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Submission of Wuhan 

Wanbang’s Case Brief,’’ dated April 22, 2021. 

3See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades 

and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: DSMC’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated April 29, 

2021; see also Chengdu Huifeng’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond 

Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Submission of Chengdu 

Huifeng’s Rebuttal Case Brief,’’ dated April 29, 

2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and 

Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019,’’ dated June 11, 2021. 

5See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of 

Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 57145 

(November 4, 2009) (Order). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and 

Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

7See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 14874. 

8The Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity is comprised 

of Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacturer Co., 

Ltd.; Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.; and 

Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd. See 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– 

2015, 82 FR 26912, 26913, n. 5 (June 12, 2017). 

Dated: August 17, 2021. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17853 Filed 8–19–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–06–2021] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 240—Martinsburg, 

West Virginia; Withdrawal of 

Application for Reorganization Under 

Alternative Site Framework 

Notice is hereby given of the 

withdrawal of the application submitted 

by the West Virginia Economic 

Development Authority, grantee of 

Foreign-Trade Zone 240, requesting 

authority to reorganize the zone under 

the alternative site framework. The 

application was docketed on February 4, 

2021 (86 FR 8762, February 9, 2021). 

The withdrawal was requested by the 

applicant due to changed 

circumstances. The case has been closed 

without prejudice. 

Dated: August 16, 2021. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17856 Filed 8–19–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–900] 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that diamond 

sawblades and parts thereof (diamond 

sawblades) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) were sold at less than 

normal value by certain exporters 

during the period of review (POR) 

November 1, 2018, through October 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable August 20, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bryan Hansen or Thomas Schauer, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–0410, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 19, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary results of the 2018–2019 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on diamond 

sawblades and parts thereof from 

China.1 We invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results 

and we received case briefs from the 

petitioner, the Diamond Sawblades 

Manufacturers’ Coalition, and Wuhan 

Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

(Wuhan Wanbang),2 and rebuttal briefs 

from the petitioner and Chengdu 

Huifeng New Material Technology Co., 

Ltd. (Chengdu Huifeng).3 On June 11, 

2021, Commerce extended the deadline 

for the final results by 60 days to no 

later than September 15, 2021.4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the 

antidumping duty Order 5 are diamond 

sawblades. A full description of the 

scope of the Order is contained in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties 

in this review are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues that parties raised, and 

to which we responded in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, follows as 

an appendix to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

We preliminarily found that Bosun 

Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang Weiwang Tools 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Weihai 

Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., 

Ltd., which have been eligible for 

separate rates in previous segments of 

the proceeding and are subject to this 

review, did not have any shipments of 

subject merchandise during the POR.7

No party commented on the Preliminary 

Results regarding our no-shipments 

determination. Therefore, for these final 

results, we continue to find that these 

companies did not have any shipments 

of subject merchandise during the POR 

and will issue appropriate instructions 

to CBP based on these final results. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, and for the reasons explained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

we did not make changes to the 

preliminary calculations of the 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the mandatory respondents, Chengdu 

Huifeng and Wuhan Wanbang, and the 

margin assigned to the separate rate 

respondents. 

Separate Rate for Non-Selected 

Companies 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

that evidence provided by Chengdu 

Huifeng, the Jiangsu Fengtai Single 

Entity,8 Wuhan Wanbang, and Zhejiang 

Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd., supported 

finding an absence of both de jure and 

de facto government control, and, 

therefore, we preliminarily granted a 

separate rate to each of these 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES