alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, Howard Thomson, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Terrace Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                  

| | By:    | /s/ Howard Thomson         
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON             
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | August 13, 2008            

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-14-000101925-MAY-201808:11 AM
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1622

To suspend temporarily the duty on deltamethrin.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 11, 1998

Mr. ROTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on deltamethrin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.30.18 (1R,3R)-3(2,2-dibromovinyl)-

2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-carboxylic acid (S)-alpha-cyano3-phenoxybenzyl ester

(deltamethrin) in bulk or in

forms or packings for retail

sale (CAS No. 52918–63–5)

(provided for in subheading

2926.90.30 or 3808.10.25) ... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2000 ’’.
2

•S 1622 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00050-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

C O R R E C T E D

O R D E R

The State of Texas has filed a mandamus petition challenging the trial court's grant of 

certain time credits to real party in interest Crispen Hanson. We determined that no action would 

be taken on the petition pending a response from Hanson and sent notice to the attorney the State 

identified as Hanson's attorney, Matthew DeKoatz. 

On March 17, 2022, DeKoatz sent a letter to this Court informing us that he does not 

currently represent Hanson. Consequently, we ABATE the mandamus proceeding and ORDER 

the trial court to hold a hearing and:

1) determine whether Hanson is currently represented by counsel, and if not,

2) determine whether Hanson is indigent, and if so, whether it would appropriate to appoint 

counsel for Hanson to represent him in this mandamus action. 

The trial court is ordered to hold the hearing and make its findings within 15 days of the 

date of this order. The trial court shall forward its findings to the district clerk. The district clerk 

shall prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and forward the 

same to this Court on or before April 12, 2022. The court reporter is ordered to forward a 

transcript of the hearing to this Court no later than April 12, 2022. The mandamus proceeding 

will be reinstated by order of the Court after the findings are filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of March, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
Slip-Op. 99 - 4

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, JUDGE



 


MITA COPYSTAR AMERICA, INC., 


 


Plaintiff, 





v. 
 Court No. 93-03-00159




UNITED STATES, 





Defendant. 







AMENDED JUDGMENT ORDER

In accordance with the decision (November 6, 1998) and mandate

(December 28, 1998) of the United States Court of Appeals for the

Federal Circuit, Appeal No. 98-1203, reversing this Court’s

decision in Mita Copystar America v. United States, 21 CIT __, 994

F. Supp. 393, Slip Op. 98-2 (January 9, 1998) ("Mita"), it is

hereby

ORDERED that this Court’s Opinion and Order in Mita, holding

that Customs properly classified toner cartridges under HTSUS

subheading 3707.90.30, is vacated; and it is further 

ORDERED that Customs shall reliquidate the aforementioned

subject merchandise under HTSUS subheading 9009.90.00 as "parts and

accessories of electrostatic photocopying apparatus," in accordance

with the Federal Circuit’s decision and mandate. Customs shall

refund all excess duties paid with interest as provided by law.

 JUDGE

Date: January 6, 1999

New York, New York
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles T. Williams, Also Known as Charles Gus Thigpen Williams, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 923]

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered September 2, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]). As defendant correctly concedes, he failed to preserve for our review his contention that a conflict of interest between the probation officer who prepared the presentence report and a police officer at the scene of the arrest required the preparation of a new presentence report and resentencing *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present— Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sam KraynekChief Financial OfficerNovember 15, 2010
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Sam Kraynek, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     |  |                
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------
|Date: November 9, 2006              
|                                     | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Sam Kraynek
|Sam Kraynek, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,095,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               32,342,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                   674,689
<INVENTORY>                                 18,238,886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            56,593,987
<PP&E>                                     187,996,994
<DEPRECIATION>                              94,882,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             162,387,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,809,508
<BONDS>                                     57,166,326
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,479,241
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,338,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               162,387,560
<SALES>                                    209,206,775
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           209,206,775
<CGS>                                      160,951,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              160,951,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               504,862
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,741,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,441,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,146,001
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,295,261
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,295,261
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.97<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Company declared a 50% share distribution on December 18, 1996 payable on
January 13, 1997 to holders of record of the Company's Common Stock on December
27, 1996. Financial Data Schedules for prior periods were not restated.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetic Resources Unit (PGRU): Geneva, NY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Diversity Collections
                        Apple
                                    Brassica
                                    Buckwheat
                                    Celery
                                    Grape
                                    Hemp
                                    Onion
                                    Radish
                                    Squash
                                    Tart Cherry
                                    Tomato
                                    Other Seed CropsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Geneva, New York Plant Genetic Resources Unit (PGRU) People & Locations







Jackson  Bartell
                        Plant Genetic Resources Unit (PGRU)

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Research Technician
                        Phone: (315) 787-2498
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### James R. Wallis, Appellant, v Kathleen M. Wallis, Respondent.

— In an action for a divorce, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 1, 1985, which, without a hearing, denied his motion to be relieved of his obligation to pay child support for his son David by reason of the fact that the child had become emancipated.

Ordered that the order is affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Marasco at Special Term. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Kevin  Little
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Air Conditioning Equipment Mechanic
                        Phone: (515) 337-7498
                        
                        
                        Fax: (515) 337-7402(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of Elisha Torres, Petitioner, v Albert Prack, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 400]—

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. He was found guilty of the charge at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Petitioner asserts that a legitimate explanation for the discrepancy in readings between the first and the second urinalysis tests was not provided and the determination is, therefore, not *1519supported by substantial evidence. The hearing transcript reveals that the entire testimony of the SYVA representative is inexplicably missing from the record. Both the Hearing Officer and petitioner made references to such testimony during the hearing and had differing interpretations. Inasmuch as the SYVA representative’s testimony had a significant bearing on the main issue in dispute, meaningful review is precluded without it *(see Matter of Baez v Bezio,*77 AD3d 745, 746 [2010], *lv dismissed*16 NY3d 752 [2011]; *Matter of White v Fischer,*73 AD3d 1372, 1373 [2010]). Therefore, the determination must be annulled and the matter remitted for a new hearing *(see Matter of La Van v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*47 AD3d 1153 [2008]; *Matter of Auricchio v Goord,*273 AD2d 571, 572 [2000]; *Matter of Monko v Selsky,*246 AD2d 699 [1998]).

Peters, EJ., Rose, Spain, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted to that extent and matter remitted to the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.