alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

ANTHONY CROSS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CITY OF PORTLAND, a public body,

CHARLES ASHEIM, in his individual

capacity, JAMES DEFRAIN, in his

individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER

BURLEY, in his individual capacity,

PATRICK MURPHY, in his individual

capacity, BRIAN DALE, in his individual

capacity, and KEN DUILIO, in his

individual capacity,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-CV-01310-KI

JUDGMENT

Zachary Spier

405 NW 18th Avenue

Portland, OR 97209

Attorney for Plaintiff

Page 1 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:14-cv-01310-KI Document 55 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 2
James G. Rice

Senior Deputy City Attorney

Rebeca Plaza

Deputy City Attorney

Office of City Attorney

1221 SW 4th Avenue, Suite 430

Portland, OR 97204

Attorneys for Defendants

KING, Judge:

BASED ON THE RECORD, this case is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 18th day of September, 2015. 

 /s/ Garr M. King 

Garr M. King

United States District Judge

Page 2 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:14-cv-01310-KI Document 55 Filed 09/18/15 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7832

TIMOTHY LYNN ODOM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ERNEST SUTTON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-525-MU)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 4, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lynn Odom, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Lynn Odom seeks to appeal the district court’s

September 28, 2001, order dismissing his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) for failure to pay the filing fee. We dismiss

the appeal as moot because the district court re-instated the

petition after Odom paid the filing fee after dismissal.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-90,237-01 & WR-90,237-02

EX PARTE DEION XAVIER JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W15-20892-V(A) & W15-20893-V(A)

IN THE 292 DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY ND

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense

of aggravated robbery and sentenced to imprisonment for twenty-five years in one cause and six

years in the other. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Jones v. State, Nos. 05-17-

00013-CR & 05-17-00014-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 15, 2018).

Applicant alleges that new affidavits from two co-defendants show that he is actually

innocent of these offenses. The State has requested more time to investigate the claim and the trial

court has not entered any findings of fact or conclusions of law addressing the claim. We remand
these applications to the 292 District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete nd

an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. 

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 11, 2019

Do not publish
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARTHA ECHEVERRY,

Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE 

ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-3,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3611

[November 15, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE08001920 (11).

Martha Echeverry, Pembroke Pines, pro se.

Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale; 

Kimberly S. Mello and Julie A. Girard of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order directing the clerk to issue the certificate of title to 

appellee at the end of this mortgage foreclosure proceeding. Appellant’s 

claim that the order was void as a result of the automatic stay of 

bankruptcy, after the filing of her seventh petition for bankruptcy, is 

without merit. Because she did not file her bankruptcy petition until after 

issuance of the certificate of sale of the property, her right of redemption 

had terminated and her interest in the property was already 

extinguished. See § 45.0315, Fla. Stat. (2014); Household Fin. & Mortg.

Co. v. Osta, 862 So. 2d 885, 886 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.'s 333-64238, 333-63950, 333-44852, 333-87759,
333-62437, 333-11577, 333-96302, 333-81236, and 333-44336) and Form S-3 (No.'s
333-76544 and 333-32766) of our report dated February 21, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Epimmune, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.




San Diego, California
March 26, 2003
Amendment to the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 2006 ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Zebra Technologies
Corporation (the “Company”) previously adopted the 2006 Zebra Technologies Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.2 of the Plan, the Company’s Compensation Committee may amend the Plan to the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (“Section 409A”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to ensure that stock options and stock
appreciation rights issued under the Plan are stock rights exempt from the requirements of Section 409A; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and in accordance with its powers under the Plan, the Company hereby amends the Plan effective as of May 9, 2006 in the following respects: 
  

	1.	By deleting the first paragraph of Section 13.1 in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 

 “The Committee, in its sole discretion, may include in any Award Agreement provisions that permit the Participant to defer receipt of the payment of
cash or delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to such Participant upon the exercise, lapse or waiver of restrictions, or satisfaction of any requirements or goal with respect to such Award. The Award Agreement shall include the rules and
procedures for any such payment deferrals as the Committee determines in its sole discretion, subject to the following:” 
  

	2.	By deleting the last sentence of Section 19.3 in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 

 “With respect to any Option or SAR Award designed to be a stock right exempt from the requirements of Code Section 409A, the Company reserves
the right to delay a Participant’s exercise of such Award if the Company reasonably determines that issuance or payment under the Award would not be deductible under Code Section 162(m). With respect to any other Award, payment of any
amount that the Company reasonably determines would not be deductible under Code Section 162(m) shall be deferred until the earlier of the earliest date on which the Company reasonably determines that the deductibility of the payment will not
be so limited, or the year following termination of employment.” 
 Executed on
this 2nd day of December, 2008. 
  

			
	ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Joanne Townsend
		 	Joanne Townsend
	Its:	 	Vice President, Human Resources


  

 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         737,408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,061,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,626,162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,637,304
<PP&E>                                       1,983,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,356,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,803,947
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,108,697
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,356,915
<SALES>                                     14,628,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,628,967
<CGS>                                       10,183,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,160,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,424,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                   406,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,018,066
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,018,066
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43


</TABLE>
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-13-00318-CR 

BRANDI NICOLE WEST, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the County Court 

Ochiltree County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 19,805, Honorable Earl McKinley, Presiding 

 

February 26, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Appellant, Brandi Nicole West, appealed an order revoking community 

supervision for the offense of driving while intoxicated, and sentencing her to thirty days’ 

incarceration in the Ochiltree County Jail, and $1,250 fine. We will dismiss.

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by November 14, 2013. When no brief was 

received by that date, this Court sent appellant notice that her brief was past due, and 

informing her that, if her brief was not filed by December 2, 2013, the appeal would be 

abated and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P.
2

38.8(b)(2), (3). When no brief was received, this Court issued an opinion abating the 

appeal and remanding the cause to the trial court to determine, inter alia, whether 

appellant desired to pursue this appeal. See West v. State, No. 07-13-00318-CR, 2014 

Tex. App. LEXIS 53, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Jan. 6, 2014, no pet.) (per curiam) 

(not designated for publication). On remand, the trial court noticed appellant of hearing 

but appellant failed to appear. Based on information provided by appointed counsel, 

however, the trial court concluded that appellant no longer desires to prosecute this 

appeal. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were included in a 

supplemental clerk’s record filed with this Court on January 31, 2014. Also included in 

this supplemental clerk’s record is the affidavit of appointed counsel attesting that 

appellant no longer desires to prosecute this appeal. On February 11, 2014, this Court 

received appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal. This motion, however, is signed only by 

appellant and not appellant’s counsel. 

While the motion does not meet the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a) because it is not signed by appellant and counsel, we consider the 

signed affidavit of counsel to be sufficient to fulfill the purpose for Rule 42.2(a)’s 

requirement that the attorney sign a motion to dismiss appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. 

As this Court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving appellant’s motion, the 

motion is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at 

appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will 

issue forthwith.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr: Stuttgart, AR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stuttgart, Arkansas Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr People & Locations







Paxton  Harper
                        Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Cntr

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker
                        Phone: (870) 672-8276
                        
                        
                        Fax: (870) 673-7710(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

TERRY PAUL HEDIN, 3:14-CV-01504-CL

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

 

JUAN D. CASTILLO, Regional 

Director; MARION FEATHER, 

Warden FCI Sheridan; 

RICHARD KOWALCZYK, Head 

Chaplain FCI Sheridan; 

DANIEL WILLIAMS, Chaplain 

FCI Sheridan,

 Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued Findings and

Recommendation (#19) on January 12, 2015, in which he recommends

the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion (#14) for Temporary Restraining

Order and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction. 

1 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01504-CL Document 35 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 3
Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the Findings and

Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make

a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's

report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561

F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s Objections

and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings

and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Clark’s Findings and

Recommendation (#19) and, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion

(#14) for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause for 

2 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01504-CL Document 35 Filed 02/26/15 Page 2 of 3
Preliminary Injunction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 26th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

3 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01504-CL Document 35 Filed 02/26/15 Page 3 of 3
WILBORN LAW OFFICE, P.C.

TIM WILBORN, Attorney at Law — OSB # 944644

tim@wilbornlaw.com

P.O. Box 370578

Las Vegas, NV 89137

Voice: (702) 240-0184

Fax: (503) 926-9133

 Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

LISA CHAVEZ, Case No. 3:14-cv-01178-JE

Plaintiff,

vs. PROPOSED ORDER

COMMISSIONER of Social Security,

Defendant.

Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $13,555.00 are hereby awarded to Attorney Tim Wilborn

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Previously, this court awarded fees pursuant to the Equal Access

To Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. When issuing the § 406(b) check, the agency is directed

to subtract the amount of the EAJA fee previously received by the attorney and to send to Plaintiff’s

attorney, Tim Wilborn, at the address above, the balance of $7,045.55, minus any user fee. Any

amount withheld after all administrative and court attorneys fees are paid should be released to the

claimant.

DATED this ____ day of ________________, 2017.

__________________________________________

United States District Court or Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ Tim Wilborn, OSB # 944644

(702) 240-0184

 Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER - Page 1

8th November

/s/ John Jelderks

XXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXX
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 2 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 3 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 4 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 5 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 6 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 7 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 8 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 9 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 10 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 11 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 12 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 13 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 14 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 15 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 16 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 17 of 18
Case 3:14-cv-01299-BR Document 13 Filed 07/07/15 Page 18 of 18
Case: 1:03-cv-09416 Document #: 15 Filed: 03/18/04 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:94

Case: 1:03-cv-09416 Document #: 15 Filed: 03/18/04 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:95

Case: 1:03-cv-09416 Document #: 15 Filed: 03/18/04 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:96

Case: 1:03-cv-09416 Document #: 15 Filed: 03/18/04 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:97
Exhibit 4.3.1


 


Additional Agreement No. 3


to the LOAN AGREEMENT 


dated 20 August 2020 


 


30 June 2021


 



 


Arras Minerals Corp., company established
in accordance with the the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, entity No. BC1287773, located at: Suite 1610, 777 Dunsmuir
Street, Vancouver, Canada, V7Y 1K4, represented by CFO Mr. Christopher Richards, acting on basis of the Articles, hereinafter referred
to as the “Creditor”, on one part, and Ekidos Minerals LLP, a limited liability partnership established in
accordance with the laws of the Republic of Kazakhstan, BIN 191040035309, located at: Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, 050000, Panfilov
Street 158, Office 1, Almaty, represented by Director, Mrs. Irma Nuss, acting on the basis of the Charter, hereinafter referred to as
the “Debtor”, on the other part, hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties” and individually
as “Party”, have concluded this Additional Agreement No. 3 to the Loan Agreement dated
20 August 2020 (hereinafter – the “Agreement”) as follows:


 


1. Clause 3.1 of Section 3 of the Agreement to revised
as follows:


 


“The repayment of the amount of the Loan specified in this Agreement
shall be made by the Debtor on or before 30 November 2021”.


 


2. In all other matters that are not regulated by
the terms of this Additional Agreement #3, the Parties are guided by the provisions of the Agreement.


 


3. This Additional Agreement #3 enters into force on the date of its signing.


 


SIGNATURES AND REQUISITES OF THE PARTIES:


 


 


On behalf of the Creditor


Arras Minerals Corp.


 


/s/ Christopher Richards      


 


 


On behalf of the Debtor


Ekidos Minerals LLP


 


 


/s/ Irma Nuss       


Irma Nuss


Director