alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Diane S. Sykes, OSB No.980990

Phone: (503) 504-7176

E-Mail : diane @dianes sykeslaw. com

DIANE S. SYKES ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C.

5911 SE 43'd Avenue

Porlland, OR 97206

Attorney for Plaintiff Nancy Hadbavny

NANCY HADBAVNY,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEGACY HEALTH SYSTEM CPC, LLC,,

an Oregon corporation, and LEGACY

HEALTH, a domestic non-profit

corporation,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON.PORTLAND DIVISION

Case No. 3: 14-cv-01 670-AC

NOTICE OF SBTTLEMENT AND

STIPULATION OF DISMISSALWITH

PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT FEES OR

COSTS TO ANY PARTY

Defendants.

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff Nancy Hadbavny and Defendants Legacy

Health System CPC, LLC, and Legacy Health, by and through their undersigned

attorneys, hereby notify this Court that this action has been settled and stipulate to a

PAGE 1_ NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION OF'DISMISSAL

WITHPRE,JUDICE AND WITHOUT FEES OR COSTS TO ANY

PARTY

Case 3:14-cv-01670-AC Document 18 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 3
judgment of dismissal of this case, and all claims and counterclaims, with prejudice, and

without attorney fees, costs, or disbursements to any party.

F+Ot

Respectfully submitted this !a day of August. 2015.

DIANE S. SYKES, TONKON TORP, LLP

ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C.

By /s/ Diane S. $tkes By: /s/ Blerina Kotori

Diane S. Sykes, OSB No. 980990 Robert L. Carey, OSB No. 871860

Attomey for Plaintiff Blerina Kotori, OSB No. 074381

Attorneys for Defendants

PAGE 2. NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION OF'DISMISSAL

WITHPREJUDICE AND WITHOUT FBES OR COSTS TO ANY

PARTY

Case 3:14-cv-01670-AC Document 18 Filed 08/06/15 Page 2 of 3
cER.TmpATE OF SERVTqE

I hereby ce*iff that counsel for plaintiffserved the foregoing NOTICE Of,.

SETTLEMENT A}iD STIPULATION OF DISNIISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AI\ID

WITIIOUT FEES OR COSTS TO ANY PARTY on the following:

Blerina Kotori

Robert L. Carey

Tonkon Torp LLP

1600 Pioneer Tower

888 SW Fifth Avenue

Portland, Oregon 972M

blerinakotori@tonkon.com

bob.carey@CInkon.com

Attorneys for Defendants l".agwy Health System CPC, LLC, and lxgacy Health.

Zia e-m4il only.

Dated this \o "+^ day of August, 2015.

AT LAIY, P.C.

Of Auorneys for PlaintiffNancy

Page 1- CERTIFICATE OF SERWCE

S. Sykes,

Case 3:14-cv-01670-AC Document 18 Filed 08/06/15 Page 3 of 3
#### Pope *v.*Scott.

Lumpkin, J.

1. There.being conflicting evidence on the subject of whether notice of a motion for a new trial was given, and also as to whether there was proper notice of the setting down of the case for a trial after a new trial had been granted, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant an injunction to restrain the enforcement of the judgment *276entered upon a replevy bond given by tlie plaintiff in the bail-trover proceeding, because of an alleged want of notice in the particulars mentioned.

March 9, 1915.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Ellis. Fulton superior court. June 30, 1914.

*S. C. Grane*and *Gober & Jaclcson,*for plaintiff.

*George Westmoreland*and *Joseph W. & John D. Humphries,*for defendant.

2. Where a plaintiff in an action of trover sues out bail process, and, upon failure of the defendant to give bond, gives a bond and obtains possession of the property, and subsequently fails to prosecute his action, whereupon it is dismissed for want of prosecution, the judgment of dismissal so far operates as a judgment of restitution as to authorize the court to enter judgment on the replevy bond for the value of the property. *Marshall*v. *Livingston,*77 *Ga.*21; *Smith*v. *Adams,*79 *Ga.*802 (5 S. E. 242) ; *Thomas*v. *Price,*88 *Ga.*533 (15 S. E. 11).

*(a)*As against the replevying party, a judgment may be entered on such bond by the court for the value of the property replevied, as stated in the pleading of such party and in the bond given by him; and it is not necessary to bring suit on the bond or to have a jury trial. *Lauchheimer*v. *Jacobs,*126 *Ga.*261 (55 S. E. 55).

*(b)*In determining the amount for which judgment shall be rendered in lieu of a writ of restitution, the court may consider the bond itself and the plaintiff’s declaration and affidavit to require bail. It does not appear in the present case that the court did not have before it sufficient data from which to ascertain the amount of the judgment rendered. See the authorities cited supra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 43650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1010-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Capacity 
Release Agreements--8/1/2021 to be effective 8/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5011.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/16/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1012-000.
    Applicants: Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: EGTS--August 2, 2021 
Nonconforming Service Agreements to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5012.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/16/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1013-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing--July 
1, 2021 Ternium to be effective 8/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5042.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/16/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1014-000.
    Applicants: Rover Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Summary of Negotiated Rate 
Capacity Release Agreements on 8-2-21 to be effective 8/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/16/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1015-000.
    Applicants: Inflection Energy LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waiver of Capacity Release 
Regulations, et al. of Inflection Energy LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 8/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210802-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/16/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 4, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17026 Filed 8-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

L.H., the Father

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD

LITEM PROGRAM

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 2863

[ January 18, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Kathleen J. Kroll , Judge; L.T. Case No. 15DP300629 JL

.

Andrew A. Holness of the Law Offices of Andrew A. Holness, P.A., West

Palm Beach, for appellant.

Casey Barron and Meredith K. Hall, Children’s Legal Se rvices,

Bradenton, for appellee, Department of Children and Families.

Sara E. Goldfarb, Sanford, for appellee, Guardian ad Litem Program.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

v. 

DANIEL JOSEPH STADELMAN, 

Defendant 

6:14-CR-00336 AA 

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL 

AND DISBURSEMENT OF 

REGISTRY FUNDS 

Upon the motion of the United States for withdrawal and disbursement of registry funds, 

and in accordance with the Judgment entered June 24,2015, the total funds in the amount of 

$90,000.00, deposited with the Comi pursuant to the Order to Deposit Funds (docket #12), shall 

be transferred to restitution to be disbursed to the victim(s) as ordered in the Judgment in this 

case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this ~ayofJuly,2015. r i> 

~~--~-

PRESENTED BY: 

BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 

Acting United States Attorney 

__ lsi _________ _ 

KATHLEEN L. BICKERS, OSB #85151 

Assistant United States Attorney 

THE HONORABLE ANN AIKEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

FOR COURT USE ONLY 

APPROVED AS TO FORM: 

MARY MORAN, Clerk of Comi 

Ak /Y/~7£~~---------- By: Financial Administrator 

Case 6:14-cr-00336-AA Document 27 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-4403

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRY RAYNARD GARDNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-00-381)

Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas N. Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro,

North Carolina, for Appellant. Benjamin H. White, Jr., United

States Attorney, Robert A.J. Lang, Assistant United States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Raynard Gardner appeals his sentence pursuant to a

guilty plea for possession of a firearm after having been convicted

of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West 2000).

Gardner’s attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating there are no meritorious

issues for appeal. On Gardner’s behalf, counsel contends the

district court misapplied the United States Sentencing Guidelines

to reach an improperly severe sentence. Although notified of his

right to file a pro se supplemental brief, Gardner has not done so.

We have reviewed the entire record in this case in accordance

with the requirements of Anders and find no error in the district

court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines and no meritorious

issues for appeal. We therefore affirm.

Finally, we deny counsel’s motion to withdraw and require that

counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the

Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Gardner

requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such

a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court

for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must

state that a copy thereof was served on Gardner. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
3

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Registrant"), the
undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



| |  | /s/ Michael D. PriceMichael D. Price
Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | March 16, 2005                                                                                                                                    

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 23


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following documents 
of our reports, dated October 11, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated 
financial statements and a related financial statement schedule of Tuscarora 
Incorporated and its subsidiaries as of August 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the 
years ended August 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which reports are incorporated by 
reference or included in the annual report on Form 10-K of Tuscarora 
Incorporated for its fiscal year ended August 31, 1996:

        1. Registration Statements No. 33-35373 and No. 333-06111 on Form S-8 
for the 1985 Incentive Stock Option Plan and 1989 Stock Incentive Plan of 
Tuscarora Incorporated, filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and 
the Prospectus used in connection with such Registration Statements; and 

        2. Registration Statement No. 33-35587 on Form S-8 for the Tuscarora 
Incorporated Common Stock Purchase Plan for Salaried Employees, filed under the 
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Prospectus used in connection with 
such Registration Statement.

        We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption 
"Experts" in the above-mentioned Prospectuses.

                                               /s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.
                                               -----------------------    
Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania                        S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
November 27, 1996                                 Certified Public Accountants
Exhibit 23.1
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-4 (No. 333-108036) and in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (Nos. 333-110093, 333-102049, 333-84846, 333-50942, 333-49182,333-62275, 333-38871 and 333-10697) of Hyperion Solutions Corporation of ourreport dated September 10, 2004 relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MATTHEW VOGT, 3:14-CV-01224-PK

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

 

JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY SKIDGEL,

and CAPTAIN HECKATHORN,

 Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and

Recommendation (#88) on November 3, 2016, in which he recommends

this Court grant Defendants’ Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment

and dismiss this matter. The matter is now before this Court

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b).

1 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01224-PK Document 97 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 2
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall,

561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not

find any error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and

Recommendation (#88). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’

Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 22nd day of March, 2017.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01224-PK Document 97 Filed 03/22/17 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1593

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances

Import and Export Act with respect to penalties for powder cocaine

and crack cocaine offenses.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 2, 1998

Mr. ALLARD (for himself and Mr. BREAUX) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled

Substances Import and Export Act with respect to penalties for powder cocaine and crack cocaine offenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Powder-Crack Cocaine

5 Penalty Equalization Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. TRAFFICKING.

7 (a) 50-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 401(b)(1)(A) of the

8 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A)) is

9 amended—
2

•S 1593 IS

1 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘5 kilograms’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘50 grams’’;

3 (2) by striking clause (iii); and

4 (3) by redesignating clauses (iv) through (viii)

5 as clauses (iii) through (vii), respectively.

6 (b) 5-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 401(b)(1)(B) of the

7 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(B)) is

8 amended—

9 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘500 grams’’ and

10 inserting ‘‘5 grams’’;

11 (2) by striking clause (iii); and

12 (3) by redesignating clauses (iv) through (viii)

13 as clauses (iii) through (vii), respectively.

14 SEC. 3. IMPORT AND EXPORT.

15 (a) 50-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 1010(b)(1) of the

16 Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.

17 960(b)(1)) is amended—

18 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘5 kilo19 grams’’ and inserting ‘‘50 grams’’;

20 (2) by striking subparagraph (C); and

21 (3) by redesignating subparagraphs (D)

22 through (H) as subparagraphs (C) through (G), re23 spectively.
3

•S 1593 IS

1 (b) 5-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 1010(b)(2) of the

2 Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.

3 960(b)(2)) is amended—

4 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘500

5 grams’’ and inserting ‘‘5 grams’’;

6 (2) by striking subparagraph (C); and

7 (3) by redesignating subparagraphs (D)

8 through (H) as subparagraphs (C) through (G), re9 spectively.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the financial
statements of HEARx Ltd. and is qualified in its entirety by references to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000821536
<NAME> HEARx LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1998
<CASH>                                       2,650,111
<SECURITIES>                                 7,170,780
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,087,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (588,509)
<INVENTORY>                                    529,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,277,986
<PP&E>                                      13,509,920
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,409,390)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,208,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,663,944
<BONDS>                                        123,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,709
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,402,364
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,018,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,208,317
<SALES>                                     27,493,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,493,849
<CGS>                                        8,193,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,988,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,931,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (12,931,555)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,931,555)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,931,555)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Richard Baron, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Animas Corporation,certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Animas Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of Animas Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. Animas Corporation’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Animas Corporation and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Animas Corporation, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of Animas Corporation’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in Animas Corporation’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during Animas Corporation’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, Animas Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.5. Animas Corporation’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Animas Corporation’s auditors and theaudit committee of Animas Corporation’s board of directors: (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likelyto adversely affect Animas Corporation’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Animas Corporation’s internal controlover financial reporting.     Date: August 15, 2005      By:      */s/ Richard Baron*         Richard Baron