alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11
            Statement Regarding the Computation of Earnings Per Share




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            For the quarter ending
                                                                   March 31,
                                                         --------------------------
                                                           1998(1)        1997(1)
                                                         -----------    -----------
<S>                                                     <C>             <C> 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
     Total average shares outstanding                     33,876,815     33,115,344
     Average allocated ESOP shares                             3,699         18,564
                                                         -----------    -----------
Basic average shares                                      33,880,514     33,133,908
                                                         -----------    -----------
     Common Stock Equivalents (1)
            Option plans Mgt/Directors                       271,729        238,284
            RRP Management                                    27,877         21,876
                                                         -----------    -----------
    Total average allocated award shares                     299,606        260,160
                                                         -----------    -----------
    Fully diluted average shares outstanding              34,180,120     33,394,068
                                                         ===========    ===========
Net income for the period                                $ 5,749,000    $ 4,709,000
Basic Earnings per share                                 $      0.17    $      0.14
                                                         ===========    ===========
Diluted earnings per share                               $      0.17    $      0.14
                                                         ===========    ===========
</TABLE>


(1)  The 1997 earnings per share calculations reflect the retroactive effect of
     a 3 for 1 stock split effected in the form of a dividend that was approved
     by the Board of Directors on October 22, 1997. The dividend was declared to
     stockholders of record as of November 4, 1997 and was paid on November 18,
     1997.
Exhibit 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Jody L. Taylor, Chief Financial Officer of RC2 Corporation, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RC2 Corporation;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
  (b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004
 
 
  /s/ Jody L. Taylor______________
 Jody L. Taylor
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1547

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on Butanamide, N,N′-

(3,3′dimethyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diyl)bis[2-[2,4-dichlorophenyl)azo]-3-oxo-.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on

Butanamide, N,N′-(3,3′dimethyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-

diyl)bis[2-[2,4-dichlorophenyl)azo]-3-oxo-.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BUTANAMIDE, N,N′-

4 (3,3′DIMETHYL[1,1′-BIPHENYL]-4,4′-DIYL)BIS[2-

5 [2,4-DICHLOROPHENYL)AZO]-3-OXO-.

6 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar7 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

8 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:
2

S 1547 IS

‘‘ 9902.32.XX Butanamide, N,N′-

(3,3′dimethyl[1,1′-

biphenyl]-4,4′-

diyl)bis[2-[2,4-

dichlorophenyl)azo]-3-oxo- provided for in subheading

3204.17.04 ........... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00257-CV

In the INTEREST OF N.F.R., a Child

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-02004

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 8, 2015

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 

This is an appeal in a case involving the termination of appellant’s parental rights. On 

February 9, 2015, Associate Judge Charles E. Montemayor signed an order terminating appellant’s 

parental rights. Appellant timely filed a request for a de novo hearing before the referring court. 

The record reflects a de novo hearing was held before the referring court on April 20, 2015. 

However, the record does not contain an order or judgment signed by the referring court. When a 

de novo hearing has been held in the referring court, a signed order or judgment by the referring 

court is required to invoke the jurisdiction of this court. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 201.016(b) 

(West 2014).

 1 Senior Judge, sitting by assignment
04-15-00257-CV

- 2 -

We ordered appellant to either obtain a signed appealable order or judgment from the 

referring court or to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

Counsel for appellant filed a response acknowledging that no final appealable order had been 

signed by the referring court and asserting this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. 

We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
# C_2005273EN.01000801.xml

| 4.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/8

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2005/C 273/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

SPAIN

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FLYLINK EXPRESS, S. A. | Po de la Castellana, 40 bis |
| ES-28046 Madrid |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

FLYLINK EXPRESS, S. A.

Po de la Castellana, 40 bis

o

ES-28046 Madrid

passengers, mail, cargo

31.8.2005

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1448 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1448

       To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 1997

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new item:

      

``    9902.32.36     Benzenesulfonic                                                                            
                      acid, 2-amino-5-                                                                          
                      nitro-, (CAS No.                                                                          
                      96-75-3)                                                                                  
                      (provided for in                                                                          
                      subheading                                                                                
                      2921.42.90.00)..  Free              No change        No change        On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/2000            
                                                                                                              ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7825

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN MAURICE HENOUD, a/k/a John Harvey, a/k/a J. M. Harvey, a/k/a J. M. 

Hardey, a/k/a Jerry Geohn Davidson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00004-AWA-TEM-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: December 17, 2021

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Maurice Henoud, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Maurice Henoud appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).*

 The district court determined 

that Henoud had not established extraordinary and compelling reasons for a reduction in 

his sentence; and even if he had, it would still deny his motions based on consideration of 

the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. 

Henoud, No. 2:04-cr-00004-AWA-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020); see also United States 

v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 330-32 (4th Cir. 2021) (per curiam); United States v. High, 997 

F.3d 181, 185-91 (4th Cir. 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* After filing this appeal, Henoud notified this court that he was placed in home 

confinement pursuant to the CARES Act, but he remains in the custody of the Bureau of 

Prisons. See United States v. Saunders, 986 F.3d 1076, 1078 (7th Cir. 2021). Because it 

would still be possible for the district court to grant him effectual relief under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), by reducing his prison sentence to time served and releasing him from 

the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, we conclude that this appeal is not moot. See United 

States v. Ketter, 908 F.3d 61, 65 (4th Cir. 2018). We further conclude the district court’s 

order was a final order. See Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015).
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: February 2, 2017 5 23240

________________________________ In the Matter of the Claim of DALLAS DICKSON, Appellant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: November 29, 2016 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________ Dallas Dickson, New York City, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 17, 2016, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Decision affirmed. No opinion. McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.-2- 523240

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
# C_2005266EN.01000201.xml

| 27.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/2

---

Extension and amendment of public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services within Greece in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

(2005/C 266/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | The Greek Government has decided to extend and revise from 1 April 2006 the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services within Greece, pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, which were published in
  Official Journal of the European Communities C 164 of 10 July 2002. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Greek Government has decided to extend and revise from 1 April 2006 the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services within Greece, pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, which were published in
  Official Journal of the European Communities C 164 of 10 July 2002.

Official Journal of the European Communities

| 2. | The amendments to the public service obligations are as follows:

  Minimum frequency of flights and minimum number of seats available each week on the following flights:







  — | Athens — Κarpathos |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The amendments to the public service obligations are as follows:

Minimum frequency of flights and minimum number of seats available each week on the following flights:

Minimum frequency of flights and minimum number of seats available each week on the following flights:

—

Athens — Κarpathos

| — | Athens — Sitia |
| --- | --- |

—

Athens — Sitia

| — | Thessaloniki — Corfu |
| --- | --- |

—

Thessaloniki — Corfu

Athens — Karpathos

Three return flights a week, and a total of 150 seats a week in each direction throughout the winter.

Seven return flights a week, and a total of 350 seats a week in each direction throughout the summer.

Athens — Sitia

Three return flights a week, and a total of 90 seats a week in each direction throughout the winter.

Four return flights a week, and a total of 120 seats a week in each direction throughout the summer.

Thessaloniki — Corfu

Three return flights a week, and a total of 180 seats a week in each direction throughout the winter.

Four return flights a week, and a total of 240 seats a week in each direction throughout the summer.

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Beltsville Agricultural Research Center: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Michael W Kemp
                        Research Support Services

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker Leader
                        Phone: (301) 504-8398
                        
                        
                        Fax: (301) 504-8746(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,712,984
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,712,984)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1521

To provide a law enforcement exception to the prohibition on the advertising

of certain electronic devices.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10, 1997

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide a law enforcement exception to the prohibition

on the advertising of certain electronic devices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Enforcement

5 Technology Advertisement Clarification Act of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO PROHIBITION ON ADVERTISING

7 CERTAIN DEVICES.

8 Section 2512 of title 18, United States Code, is

9 amended by adding at the end the following:
2

S 1521 IS

1 ‘‘(3) It shall not be unlawful under this section to

2 advertise for sale a device described in subsection (1) of

3 this section if the advertisement is mailed, sent, or carried

4 in interstate or foreign commerce solely to a domestic pro5 vider of wire or electronic communication service or to an

6 agency of the United States, a State, or a political subdivi7 sion thereof which is duly authorized to use such device.’’.

Æ
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Julio Torres Palomo, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00076

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 196th District Court of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 28777 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss,

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Julio Torres Palomo, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 1, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk