alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 27, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51351 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JORGE REYES, JR Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-2622-1
Before KING, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jorge Reyes, Jr., (Reyes) pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent todistribute, and actual possession with intent to distribute, five or more kilograms of cocaine. The district court denied Reyes’s motion to suppress evidence of the cocaine. When reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress evidenc e, this court reviews the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Hunt, 253 F.3d 227, 229-30 (5th Cir. 2001).No. 06-51351

2 The Fourth Amendment does not protect people from all searches and seizures, but it does protect them from unreasonable searches and seizures. See Unite d States v. Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 361 (5th Cir. 1998). At an immigration checkpoint, such as in this case, any vehicle may be stopped even in the absence ofany individualized suspicion ofillegal activity sothat the Border Patrol Agent may determine the citizenship status of the people passing through the checkpoint. United States v. Garcia-Garcia, 319 F.3d 726, 729 (5th Cir. 2003); Uni ted States v. Machuca-Barrera, 261 F.3d 425, 431 (5th Cir. 2001). “The permissible duration of an immigration checkpoint stop is therefore the time reasonably necessary to determine the citizenship status of the persons stopped.” Machuca-Barrera, 261 F.3d at 433. Agent Landrum testified that Reyes’s immigration inspection took two to three minutes. During that brief time, the totality of the circumstances gave Agent Landrum a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Thus, the district court’s findi ng that Reyes’s immigration inspection at the primary inspection
area was brief and did not unconstitutionally extend beyond its permissible duration was not clearly erroneous. I d. at 431-35. The district court also did not
err in holding that Landrum properly referred Reyes’s vehicle to secondary inspection. Id. at 435 n.32. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Databases
                        Alfalfa Transcription Factor Database
                                    iPhyClassifier - Phytoplasma Sequence ClassificationSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory People & Locations







Julia  Cabrera-Woscek
                        Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Lab Technician
                        Phone: (301) 504-5739
                        
                        
                        Fax: (301) 504-5449(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          1,763
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   6,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                      433
<INVENTORY>                                     1,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,718
<PP&E>                                         86,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                 35,966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 72,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,044
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       14,791
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   72,831
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,857
<CGS>                                           1,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (88)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                      535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               843
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      843
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .16



</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Horacio Hernandez d/b/a Top Rank

Transport

,

Appellant,

v.

Edgar Duran d/b/a Duran's Body Shop

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00 1 31

- CV

Appeal from the

210 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 201 8DCV4430 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until October 12 , 20 20

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Erika C. Wright , Court Reporter for the 210 th District Court

,

for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record for the above styled and numbered

cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before October 12, 2020

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17 th day of September , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox

, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sugarbeet and Bean Research: East Lansing, MI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area East Lansing, Michigan Sugarbeet and Bean Research People & Locations







Cynthia  Starr
                        Sugarbeet and Bean Research

                        




                        
                        Computer Assistant
                        Phone: (517) 353-4758
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blue Rhino
Corporation (the Company) for the three months ending October 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Billy D. Prim, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                                     
| |  | ------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Billy D. Prim                   
| |  |                                     
| |  | Billy D. Prim                       
| |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | December 10, 2003
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ James R. MurphyJames R. MurphyChairman of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)March 17, 2008
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1517

AN ACT

To extend the Visa Waiver Pilot Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 217(f) of the Immigration and Nationality

4 Act is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 1997.’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘April 30, 1998.’’

Passed the Senate November 10, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1517

AN ACT

To extend the Visa Waiver Pilot Program.
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0 371 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICKEY RODNEY PAYNE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 6 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including March 28 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 21 2021

01/21/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0371
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4379 LARON GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CR-97-943) Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 14, 2000 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL N. Elliott Barnwell, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. MillerWilliams Shealy, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Laron Griffin pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine and crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C.§ 846 (1994). The district court initially imposed a 210-month sentence. The district court thereafter granted Griffin's Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion to correct his sentence and, upon resentencing, reduced Griffin's term of imprisonment to 168 months. Following the filing of a timely notice of appeal, Griffin's attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel states that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but raises the following issues: whether the district court erred in refusing to admit privileged statements made by some of Griffin's co-conspirators to their respective attorneys in the absence of a waiver of attorney-clientprivilege and of their Fifth Amendment rights, and whether the polygraph questions that were administered to Griffin prior to his resentencing were overly broad and constituted grounds to reverse his sentence. We have reviewed counsel's arguments, Griffin's pro se supplemental brief, and the record, and we find no reversible error.We have further examined the entire record in this case in accordance with the requirements of Anders , and find no meritorious issuesfor appeal. This Court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States forfurther review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel maymove in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
1 - ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

KELLY J. RICHARDSON, and JAMES

POWELL, personally and as next friend for

I.R., a minor; and S.P., a minor;

No 3:14-cv-01027-YY

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v.

EMILIE SCHUBERT, in her individual 

Capacity; GINGER VAN WINKLE, in 

her individual capacity; ERIN WIRTZ, 

in her individual capacity; JENNIE SMITH, 

in her individual capacity; KRISTIN LEMON,

in her individual capacity; CARLOS CRUTCH,

in his individual capacity; LINDSEY VERNOOY, 

in her individual capacity; DANIELLE SANTILI-DAY, 

in her individual capacity;

Defendants.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [168] on July 26, 2017, in 

which she recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 
2 - ORDER

[157]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were 

timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. 

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. 

Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of 

Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal 

principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings & Recommendation [168].

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [157] is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this ________________ day of _________________________________ , 2017.

____________________________________________________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999             JAN-03-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-05-1998             APR-06-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998             JUL-05-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,042                  25,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                       262                      73
<INVENTORY>                                     32,243                  27,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,406                  53,567
<PP&E>                                          29,362                  29,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,816                  12,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,057                  73,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,593                  15,442
<BONDS>                                         82,214                  82,689
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,405)                (26,616)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,057                  73,472
<SALES>                                         37,221                  30,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,221                  30,713
<CGS>                                           27,004                  21,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,289                   4,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,320                   2,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,608                   1,988
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,046                     756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,562                   1,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: CLAUDIA PATRICIA ZARAGOZA 

DELGADO

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00225-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the Honorable Lyda Ness Garcia, presiding judge of the 383rd District Court of El Paso County, 

Texas, and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. 

We therefore direct the trial court to vacate its order partially granting Husband’s motion for 

summary judgment “in conformity with” our earlier opinion, in accordance with the opinion of 

this Court. The writ of mandamus will issue should the trial court fail to comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Soto, J., and Ferguson, Judge

Ferguson, Judge (Sitting by Assignment)