alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Disease Lab: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Cereal Rust Bulletins
                    PublicationsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Cereal Disease Lab People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Yue Jin
- Shahryar Kianian
- H. Corby Kistler
- James Kolmer
- Matt Rouse
- Les Szabo
- Karen Broz (Hilburn)
- Contact Information

Karen L Broz    Biological Science Lab Technician **Selected publications** Cellular development associated with induced mycotoxin synthesis in the filamentous fungusFusarium graminearum. The Wor1-like protein Fgp1 regulates pathogenicity, toxin synthesis and reproduction in the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Novel Fusarium head blight pathogens from Nepal and Louisiana revealed by multilocus genealogical concordance. Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium. Global gene regulation by Fusarium transcription factors Tri6and Tri10 reveals adaptations for toxin biosynthesis. The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localized polymorphism and pathogen specialization. Genomic analysis of host-pathogen interaction between Fusarium graminearum and wheat during early stages of disease development.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ORLANDO STANFORD,

 Appellant 

v.

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

 Appellee 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 10 WAP 2017

Appeal from the decision of the Office of 

Disciplinary Counsel dated December 14, 

2016 at No. C4-16-997 dismissing the 

complaint.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2017, the Notice of Appeal is quashed.
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1649

To exempt disabled individuals from being required to enroll with a managed

care entity under the medicaid program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

Mr. FORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To exempt disabled individuals from being required to enroll

with a managed care entity under the medicaid program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS FROM

4 REQUIRED ENROLLMENT WITH A MANAGED

5 CARE ENTITY UNDER THE MEDICAID PRO6 GRAM.

7 (a) AMENDMENT TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.—

8 Section 1932(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

9 1396u–2(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing:
2

•S 1649 IS

1 ‘‘(D) EXEMPTION OF DISABLED INDIVID2 UALS.—A State may not require under para3 graph (1) the enrollment in a managed care en4 tity of an individual who is disabled (as deter5 mined under section 1614(a)(3)).’’.

6 (b) RETROACTIVITY.—The amendment made by sub7 section (a) takes effect as if included in the enactment

8 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Public Law

9 105–33; 111 Stat. 251).

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

MARVIN THOMAS SHOEMAKER, II,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Case No. 6:14-CV-01220-KI

JUDGMENT

Kathryn Tassinari

Robert Baron

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C.

474 Willamette, Suite 200

Eugene, OR 97401

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Billy J. Williams

Acting United States Attorney

District of Oregon

Page 1 - JUDGMENT

Case 6:14-cv-01220-KI Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 2
Janice E. Hebert

Assistant United States Attorney

1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600

Portland, OR 97201-2902

Benjamin J. Groebner

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A

Seattle, WA 98104-7075

Attorneys for Defendant

KING, Judge:

Based on the record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the

Commissioner is affirmed and this case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 2nd day of September, 2015. 

 /s/ Garr M. King 

Garr M. King

United States District Judge

Page 2 - JUDGMENT

Case 6:14-cv-01220-KI Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1646

To repeal a provision of law preventing donation by the Secretary of the

Navy of the two remaining Iowa-class battleships listed on the Naval

Vessel Register and related requirements.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. TORRICELLI, and Mr. BUMPERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To repeal a provision of law preventing donation by the

Secretary of the Navy of the two remaining Iowa-class

battleships listed on the Naval Vessel Register and related requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Historic Battleship

5 Preservation Act’’.
2

•S 1646 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR CONTINUED LIST2 ING OF TWO IOWA-CLASS BATTLESHIPS ON

3 THE NAVAL VESSEL REGISTER.

4 Section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization

5 Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106; 110 Stat.

6 421) is repealed.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

January 30, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00532

- CR

Barry G. COGGINS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Jud icial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR2480 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

A ppellant’s brief wa s due on November 27, 2017

. Almost one month after the brief was due, o n December 26, 2017, Appellant filed a first motion for a sixty

- day extension of time to file the brief

. This court granted Appellant’s motion with a clear, specific warning:

NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. We ORDER Appellant to file the brief not later than January 26, 2018. If Appellant fails to file the brief as ordered, we will immediately abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for an abandonment hearing.

Despite our express warning, on January 26, 2018, court

- appointed counsel Edward F. Shaughnessy requested an additional forty

- five days to file the brief until March 12, 2018.
Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

We ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State , 952 S.W.2d 50, 52

– 53 (Tex. Ap p.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.).

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing in compliance with Rule 38.8(b) , within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, to answer the following questions:
(1) Does Appellant desire to prosecute his appeal?(2) If Appellant de sires to prosecute his appeal, can th e trial court assure this court that E dward F. Shaughnessy will file Appellant’s brief or a motion to dismiss within TEN DAYS of the date of the abandonment hearing? If the trial court determines the answer to the first question is yes and the answer to the second question is no, the trial court shall remove Edward F. Shaughnessy from this appeal and
shall appoint new counsel for Appellant.
The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first question by sworn
affidavit from A ppellant or by allowing Appellant to appear by electronic means (e.g., telephone or video conference)

. However, t he trial court must order Edward F. Shaughnessy to be physically present at the hearing. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).

We ORDER t he trial court to file supple mental clerk’s and reporter’s records in this court, not later than FIFTEEN DAYS from the date of this order, which shall include the following: (1) a transcription of the hearing and copies of any documentary evidence admitted, (2) written findings of fac t and conclusions of law, and (3) answers to this court’s two questions.
See id.
All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of January, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1574 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1574

                   To prohibit the cloning of humans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 1998

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   To prohibit the cloning of humans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Human Cloning Prohibition Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDING.

    Congress finds that the Federal Government has a moral obligation 
to the nation to prohibit the cloning of humans.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON HUMAN CLONING.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for any person to--
            (1) clone a human being; or
            (2) conduct research for the purpose of cloning a human 
        being or otherwise creating a human embryo.
    (b) Federal Funds.--No Federal funds may be obligated or expended 
to knowingly conduct or support any project of research the purpose of 
which is to clone a human being or otherwise create a human embryo.
    (c) Definition.--As used in subsection (a), the terms ``clone'' and 
``cloning'' mean the practice of creating or attempting to create a 
human being by transferring the nucleus from a human cell from whatever 
source into a human egg cell from which the nucleus has been removed 
for the purpose of, or to implant, the resulting product to initiate a 
pregnancy that could result in the birth of a human being.

SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) Civil Penalties.--Whoever is found to be in violation of 
section 2 shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 
for each such violation.
    (b) Ineligibility for Federal Funds.--An individual found to be in 
violation of section 2 shall not be eligible to receive any Federal 
funding for research regardless of the type of research being conducted 
for a period of 5 years after such violation.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sugarcane Research: Houma, LA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Houma, Louisiana Sugarcane Research People & Locations







Jennifer S Chiasson
                        Sugarcane Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (985) 853-3170
                        
                        
                        Fax: (985) 868-8369(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norman M. Bloom, Jr., Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 898]

Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (James P Punch, J), rendered January 3, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.16 [1]). Defendant failed to move to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered *(see People v Morrison,*78 AD3d 1615, 1616 [2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 834 [2011]; *People v Cannon,*59 AD3d 962, 963 [2009], *lv denied*12 NY3d 815 [2009]) and, in any event, his contention is without merit. Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court did not misinform him of the sentencing range to which he was exposed (c*f. Morrison,*78 AD3d at 1616), but in fact the court correctly informed him that he could receive, inter alia, a split sentence of up to six months in jail and probation *(see*§ 60.01 [2] [d]; § 60.04 [4], [5]; § 70.70 [3] [c]-[e]). Contrary to defendant’s additional contention, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,075
<PP&E>                                          25,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,964
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              813
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,338
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,905
<SALES>                                         17,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,434
<CGS>                                           12,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                       513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                925
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
Appeal Reinstated; Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed; and Memorandum 

Opinion filed November 20, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-17-00806-CV

SAMARA PORTFOLIO MANAGMENT, LLC, LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH 

ONWUTEAKA, P.C., AND JOSEPH ONWUTEAKA, INDIVIDUALLY, 

Appellants 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 80th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-35721 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 14, 2017. The appeal has been 

abated on the parties’ motions for the parties to pursue settlement. On November 13, 

2018, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. We 

reinstate the appeal, grant the motion, and dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jewell.
# Journal officiel C 181A/18 j

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 181A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 51e année18 juillet 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 181A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

51e année18 juillet 2008

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO) |
| 2008/C 181A/01 | Liste de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AST/38/07 — Correcteurs d'épreuves (AST 3) de langue française (FR) | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

2008/C 181A/01

Liste de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AST/38/07 — Correcteurs d'épreuves (AST 3) de langue française (FR)

1

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

| 18.7.2008 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2008

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 181/1

---

LISTE DE RÉSERVE

   (1)

CONCOURS GÉNÉRAL EPSO/AST/38/07

CORRECTEURS D'ÉPREUVES (AST 3)

DE LANGUE FRANÇAISE (FR)

(2008/C 181 A/01)

| BAJOT | Christelle |
| --- | --- |
| BEDON | Blandine |
| BESSON | Myriam |
| CHAILLOUX | Cédric |
| CRUCIFIX | Marc |
| DERGAM | Massouria |
| DOUSSET | Emmanuel |
| DRO | Isabelle |
| FOLTETE | Anne |
| FRANÇOIS | Aude |
| GONZALEZ | Maria del Carmen |
| GUETTICHE | Saïda |
| GUILLAUME | Sophie |
| HENRY | Géraldine |
| LAGIER | Raphaël |
| MARES | Christel |
| MARION | Florence |
| MISONNE | Brigitte |
| SPRANGERS | Marie |
| TOUSSAINT | Céline |

BAJOT

Christelle

BEDON

Blandine

BESSON

Myriam

CHAILLOUX

Cédric

CRUCIFIX

Marc

DERGAM

Massouria

DOUSSET

Emmanuel

DRO

Isabelle

FOLTETE

Anne

FRANÇOIS

Aude

GONZALEZ

Maria del Carmen

GUETTICHE

Saïda

GUILLAUME

Sophie

HENRY

Géraldine

LAGIER

Raphaël

MARES

Christel

MARION

Florence

MISONNE

Brigitte

SPRANGERS

Marie

TOUSSAINT

Céline

La validité de la liste expirera le 31 décembre 2009 et pourra être prorogée.

---

(1)  À la demande expresse d'un lauréat, son nom n'est pas publié.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FILING FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           3,252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,327
<INVENTORY>                                     13,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,234
<PP&E>                                         551,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                 203,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 892,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,486
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     465,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   892,958
<SALES>                                        540,879
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               540,879
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  478,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,655)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,397
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
        

</TABLE>