Page 1 - [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

Renée E. Rothauge, OSB #903712 

ReneeRothauge@markowitzherbold.com 

MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC 

Suite 3000, Pacwest Center 

1211 SW Fifth Avenue 

Portland, OR 97204-3730 

Telephone: (503) 295-3085 

Fax: (503) 323-9105 

Michael J. Summersgill (pro hac vice) 

Michael.summersgill@wilmerhale.com 

Jordan L. Hirsch (pro hac vice) 

Jordan.hirsch@wilmerhale.com 

Sarah B. Petty (pro hac vice) 

Sarah.petty@wilmerhale.com 

WILMERHALE LLP 

60 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

Telephone: (617) 526-6000 

Fax: (617) 526-5000 

Grant K. Rowan (pro hac vice) 

Grant.rowan@wilmerhale.com 

WILMERHALE LLP 

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Telephone: (202) 663-6000 

Fax: (202) 663-6011 

Arthur W. Coviello (pro hac vice) 

Arthur.coviello@wilmerhale.com 

WILMERHALE LLP 

950 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 858-6000 

Fax: (650) 858-6100 

Attorneys for Intel Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

MEMORY INTEGRITY, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

 v. 

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant.

 Case No. 3:15-cv-00262-SI 

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-SI Document 222 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 4
Page 2 - [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

Per the Court’s directive in Dkt. 218, Intel hereby submits the following proposed form 

of judgment. Intel has conferred with counsel for Memory Integrity, who indicated that Memory 

Integrity does not oppose the proposed form of judgment set forth below. Intel further provides 

notice to the Court and to Memory Integrity that following entry of final judgment, Intel intends 

to move for costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1), and Local Civil Rule 

54-1, and for attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2), and Local Civil 

Rule 54-3. 

* * * * * 

Pursuant to and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Opinion and Order granting Intel’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 216), IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

That Final Judgment is hereby entered for Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and 

against Plaintiff Memory Integrity, LLC (“Memory Integrity”) on Memory Integrity’s claims for 

infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,103,636; 7,107,409; 7,296,121; 8,572,206; and 8,898,254 

(Counts I – V of Memory Integrity’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 105)); 

That Final Judgment is hereby entered for Intel and against Memory Integrity on Intel’s 

counterclaim and affirmative defense of noninfringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,103,636; 

7,107,409; 7,296,121; 8,572,206; and 8,898,254 (Counts I, III, V, VII, and IX of Intel’s 

Amended Counterclaims and the Second Affirmative Defense set forth in Intel’s Amended 

Answer (Dkt. 121)); 

That Final Judgment is hereby entered for Intel and against Memory Integrity on Intel’s 

counterclaim and affirmative defense that Memory Integrity’s claims that any Intel products 

infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,103,636; 7,107,409; 7,296,121; 8,572,206; and 8,898,254 are barred 

by a covenant not to sue entered into by Intel and Sanmina-SCI Corporation on August 23, 2005 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-SI Document 222 Filed 04/26/16 Page 2 of 4
Page 3 - [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

(Count XI of Intel’s Amended Counterclaims and the Seventh Affirmative Defense set forth in 

Intel’s Amended Answer (Dkt. 121)); 

That all other claims, counterclaims, defenses, or other matters which have been asserted, 

including Intel’s counterclaims of patent invalidity, are dismissed without prejudice. 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-SI Document 222 Filed 04/26/16 Page 3 of 4
Page 4 - [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

Dated: April 26, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Arthur W. Coviello 

Renée E. Rothauge, OSB #903712 

MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC 

Suite 3000, Pacwest Center 

1211 SW Fifth Avenue 

Portland, OR 97204-3730 

ReneeRothauge@markowitzherbold.com 

Michael J. Summersgill (pro hac vice) 

Jordan L. Hirsch (pro hac vice) 

Sarah B. Petty (pro hac vice) 

WILMERHALE LLP 

60 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

michael.summersgill@wilmerhale.com 

jordan.hirsch@wilmerhale.com 

sarah.petty@wilmerhale.com 

Grant K. Rowan (pro hac vice) 

WILMERHALE LLP 

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Grant.rowan@wilmerhale.com 

Arthur W. Coviello (pro hac vice) 

WILMERHALE LLP 

950 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Arthur.coviello@wilmerhale.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

Intel Corporation

Case 3:15-cv-00262-SI Document 222 Filed 04/26/16 Page 4 of 4