alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6053

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALFRED TITUS SHULER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-13-BR, CA-99-106-7-BR)

Submitted: June 9, 2000 Decided: June 28, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Titus Shuler, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Titus Shuler seeks to appeal the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Government on his motion

filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Shuler, Nos. CR-96-13-BR; CA-99-106-7-BR (E.D.N.C.

Nov. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 23.1 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Wolverine Tube, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 33-73550, 33-73490, 33-87687, 333-67958, 333-67968, 333-67972, and 333-108003) on Form S-8 of Wolverine Tube, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2007, except for note 2, as to which date is June 29, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of Wolverine Tube, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for eachof the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 and the related financial statement schedule; and our report dated March 14, 2007, except as to the third paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control OverFinancial Reporting (as restated), which is as of June 29, 2007, with respect to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006; and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006, Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Wolverine Tube, Inc. 

As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based payments and, as discussed in note 13 to the consolidatedfinancial statements, effective December 31, 2006, its method of accounting for defined pension and postretirement benefit plans. 

As discussed innote 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the consolidated financial statements have been restated. 

Our report on internal control over financialreporting expresses our opinion that Wolverine Tube, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of thecontrol criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that management has identified and included in its restated assessment the following material weakness as of December 31, 2006: The Company did not have adequate policies andprocedures to ensure the appropriate classification and accounting for restricted cash in the Company’s balance sheets and cash flow statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95 (SFAS 95), *Statementof Cash Flows*. Specifically, the Company’s training processes had not emphasized SFAS 95 and other current SEC developments; accordingly, the Company’s preparation of financial statements and review processes failed to detectnon-compliance with SFAS 95 regarding the classification of restricted cash. This deficiency resulted in a material misstatement of the Company’s 2004 and 2005 cash flows provide by (used for) investing activities and resulted in thisamendment to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Birmingham, Alabama 

July 9, 2007
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research: Fort Pierce, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Links
                        USDA Main Page
                                    ARS Main PageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research People & Locations







Frank  Albano
                        Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research

                        




                        
                        BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State,

v.

ERLINDA LUJAN,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00036-CR

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D04874)

O R D E R

The Court has this day considered the State’s motion for stay of trial court proceedings 

pursuant to Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Art. 44.01(e), and concludes the motion should be GRANTED. 

Therefore, the 243rd District Court is directed to stay all proceedings in cause number 

20160D04874, styled Erlinda Lujan v. The State of Texas, pending disposition of this appeal or 

further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of February, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 19, 2002                              /s/ ROBERT E. MEAD
                                                   --------------------------
                                                          Robert E. Mead
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fred Wilkinson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company. 
 
 
 /s/
Fred Wilkinson
 Fred
Wilkinson
 Chief
Executive Officer
 April 29,
2005
<logo> First Union National Bank of North Carolina
Master Servicing Division
301 South College Street, TW9
Charlotte. North Carolina 28288-0828
704 374-2487
Fax 704 383-0387
Toll Free 800 786-9819


OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Sale and Servicing 
Rights Agreement dated as of September 1,  1991 between 
Diawa Finance Corp. (the "Company") and Fleet Real Estate 
Funding Corp.(Fleet!)  with  respect  to  Coventional,  FHA-
Insured  and  VA-Guaranteed Residential Mortgage Loans, 
Group No. 1991-HZ-i (the Agreement!!) .  Capitalized terms 
used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings 
assigned in the Agreement.  First Union Mortgage Corporation 
assumed the obligations of the Company by assignment from 
Fleet pursuant to the Assignment and Assumption dated 
December 1,  1994 by and between Fleet and First Union Mortgage 
Corporation.

Pursuant to Section 6.04 of the Agreement,  I, Anthony 
J. Gagliardo, Vice President of First Union Mortgage 
Corporation, do hereby certify that:

1.	The Company has fully complied with the provisions 
of Article IV of the Agreement during the period from 
January 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996;

2.	A review of the activities of the Company during 
the period from January 1, 1996 through December 31, 
1996 and of the Company's performance under the 
Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision; and

3.	To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
Company has fulfilled all  its obligations under the
Agreement throughout the period from January 1, 1996
through December 31, 1996.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has  executed  this 
Certificate as of the 1st day of April , 1997.

/s/Anthony J. Gagliardo	Vice President
Irrevocable
Proxy


          The
undersigned shareholder of Map Financial Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
“Company”), hereby irrevocably (to
the fullest extent permitted by law) appoints the President of the Company, the attorney and proxy of the undersigned
with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to the full extent of the undersigned’s rights with
respect to (i) the outstanding shares of Company common stock owned of record
by the undersigned as of the date of this proxy, and (ii) any and all other
shares of Company common stock or
other securities which the undersigned may acquire on or after the date hereof.
The shares of the Company Common Stock referred to in clauses (i) and (ii) of
the immediately preceding sentence are
collectively referred to in this proxy as the “Shares”. Upon the execution
hereof, any prior proxies given by
the undersigned with respect to any of the Shares are hereby revoked and the undersigned agrees that no subsequent proxies
will be given with respect to any of the Shares.


          This
proxy is irrevocable, is coupled with an interest and is granted in connection
with the Subscription Agreement between the
Company and the undersigned. This proxy shall remain in full force and effect to the fullest extent permitted by
law.


          The
attorney and proxy named above will be empowered, and may exercise this proxy,
to vote the Shares at any meeting of the stockholders of the Company, however
called, and in any action by written consent of the stockholders of the Company.


          This
proxy shall be binding upon the heirs, estate, executors, personal
representatives, successors and
assigns of the undersigned, including any transferee of any of the Shares. If
any provision of this proxy or any
part of any such provision is held under any circumstances to be invalid or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction,
then (a) such provision or part thereof shall, with respect to such
circumstances and in such
jurisdiction, be deemed amended to conform to applicable laws so as to be valid
and enforceable to the fullest extent possible, (b) the invalidity or
unenforceability of such provision or part thereof under such circumstances and in such jurisdiction shall
not affect the validity or enforceability of such provision or part thereof under any other circumstances or
in any other jurisdiction and (c) the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision or part thereof under such
circumstances and in such jurisdiction shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of such
provision or the validity or enforceability of any provision of this proxy. Each provision of this proxy is
separable from every other provision of this proxy, and each part of each
provision of this proxy is separable from every other part of such provision.


          IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this irrevocable proxy as of the
8th day of September 2008.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
BAYVILLE GLOBAL LIMITED


	
 


	
 

	



	
 

	



	
 

	
NAME:

	
Shirley
 McClymont 


	
 


	
 

	
FOR

	
 (ILLEGIBLE)
 Directors Limited
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JENNIFER HAMMOND, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COL VIN, Acting Commissioner 

of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:14 CV 01308-TC 

ORDER 

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 1, 

2015. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual 

findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 

1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and 

Recommendation. 

Dated this _L!J_ day of December, 2015. 

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge 

Order -- Page 1 

Case 3:14-cv-01308-TC Document 34 Filed 12/19/15 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7029

WILLIAM LEE FISHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID L. HIGH, Special Agent, Drug Enforcement

Administration; U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY;

OTHER UNKNOWN AGENTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-94-1110-R)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lee Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Corcoran, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

civil action to recover $10,000 which was administratively forfeited as proceeds of drug trafficking. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fisher

v. High, No. CA-94-1110-R (W.D. Va. May 28, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<logo>Homeside Lending, Inc.
March 27,1997

NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, N.A.
5325 SPECTRUM DR
FREDERICK, MD 21701

RE:	Annual Certifications
Dear Investor:
I am pleased to enclose for your records, a HomeSide 
Management Contact List.  The Errors and Omissions and 
Fidelity Bond Certificates, as well as the audited 
financial statements, will be sent under separate cover. 
Also, please note that our fiscal year-end has changed 
from December 31st to February 28th. We hereby certify that:

1.	We hold as required fire, extended, and other types 
of coverage customary in the locality where the property 
is located and that such policies remain in full force 
and effect on all mortgages serviced by us for you.

2.	We will maintain Fidelity Bond coverage and Errors 
& Omissions coverage against losses as a direct result of 
failure on our part to properly service all policies held 
by us in connection with such mortgages.

3.	All outstanding property taxes, assessments and other 
special charges which could encumber your interest and which 
are reasonably ascertainable by HomeSide Lending, Inc. will be 
promptly disbursed.

4.	We comply with the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Section 
605H, ("the Act") as amended of the Internal Revenue Code 
and mail a letter annually to mortgagors for which our 
records do not reflect a Tax Identification Number.

5.	We report to each mortgagor by January 31 of each 
year interest received by year-end and. if applicable, 
the points paid directly by mortgagors on the purchase of 
a principal residence using IRS Form 1098.

If there are any questions or concerns which you would 
like to discuss regarding your portfolio, please contact 
me at (210) 525-7510 or by fax at (210) 525-7511.

I would like to express our appreciation for your 
continued support as one of our valued investors and to 
thank you for the confidence you have placed in our team at HomeSide.

	Sincerely,
/s/Joel Gendron
Vice President
Investor Accounting Manager

Enclosure


P0. Box 47524, San Antonio, Texas 78265-7524 210-525-7000
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000794

19-SEP-2019

07:59 AM
- 1 -

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS

NO. 01-14-00865

HARRY W. STURGES, IV, APPELLANT

V.

SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., APPELLEE

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. One (1)

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0071918

APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

HARRY W. STURGES, IV, Appellant, through undersigned counsel, hereby files

his Motion to Dismiss Appeal, and in support thereof, respectfully represents:

1. Harry W. Sturges, IV, Appellant, and Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., Appellee,

have entered into a Settlement Agreement resolving their differences.

2. This Settlement Agreement has been approved by the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, in the case styled

In re Harry Wilton Sturges, IV, 12-34249. The Court entered an Order approving the

Settlement Agreement on January 7, 2015.

3. Accordingly, as all differences between the parties have been amicably

resolved, Appellant hereby requests that this Court enter an order dismissing the

Appellant’s appeal in the above-captioned matter.

WHEREFORE, Appellant respectfully requests that this Court enter an order

dismissing this case and granting such other and further relief as is equitable and just.

ACCEPTED

01-14-00865-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

1/28/2015 10:47:39 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/28/2015 10:47:39 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
- 2 -

January 28, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Patrick D. Devine

Patrick D. Devine

State Bar No. 05662200

Law Office of Patrick D. Devine

8300 FM 1960 West, Suite 450

Houston, Texas 77070

Phone: 832-251-2722

Fax: 866-488-1082

Email: pdevine@pdevinelaw.com

Attorney for Harry W. Sturges, IV

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of the foregoing pleading has been sent by telephonic

document transfer before 5:00 p.m. of the recipient's local time to (1) Israel Saucedo,

Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, PC, Parkway Office Center, Suite 900, 14160 North Dallas

Parkway, Dallas, Texas 75254, at Facsimile 214-635-2686; (2) Rex L. Kesler, 2311

Canal Street, Suite 304, Houston, TX 77003 at Facsimile 281-501-3191; and (3) Mitchell

J. Buchman, Battett Daffin Frappier Turner, 1900 St. James Place, Suite 500, Houston,

TX 77056 at MitchelB@bdfgroup.com on the 28th day of January, 2015.

/s/ Patrick D. Devine

Patrick D. Devine

Attorneys for Harry W. Sturges, IV