alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: APPEAL OF PROSPECT CROZER 

LLC FROM THE DECISION OF THE 

BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS OF 

DELAWARE COUNTY, PA

PETITION OF: CHESTER UPLAND 

SCHOOL DISTRICT

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Nos. 465-498 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the

remaining issue. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred by finding that a judicial officer has 

violated Pa. Const., art. V, §17, concluding that such violation resulted in 

the automatic forfeiture of judicial office, and determining that such violation 

constitutes a structural error which renders the trial court’s orders void 

ab initio?
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 11


          Exhibit 11 - Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                       1992       1993       1994       1995       1996
                                       ----       ----       ----       ----       ----
<S>                                   <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
PRIMARY
  Weighted average number of 
    shares of Common Stock
    outstanding                       6,097      6,109      6,129      6,154      6,242

  Net effect of dilutive
    stock options - based on
    the treasury stock method
    using average market price          102        102         71        102        120
                                     ------     ------     ------     ------     ------   

      TOTAL                           6,199      6,211      6,200      6,256      6,362  
                                     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======   

  Net income                         $4,891     $4,270     $5,703     $8,980     $9,653   
                                     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======   

  Per share amount                    $0.80      $0.69      $0.92      $1.44      $1.52
                                     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======

FULLY DILUTED
  Weighted average number of 
    shares of Common Stock
    outstanding                       6,097      6,109      6,129      6,154      6,242

  Net effect of dilutive
    stock options - based on
    the treasury stock method
    using greater of average 
    market price or closing
    market price                        114        102         71        137        120
                                     ------     ------     ------     ------     ------   

      TOTAL                           6,211      6,211      6,200      6,291      6,362  
                                     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======   

  Net income                         $4,891     $4,270     $5,703     $8,980     $9,653   
                                     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======   

  Per share amount                    $0.80      $0.69      $0.92      $1.43      $1.52
                                     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
</TABLE>


The per share and share numbers have been adjusted to reflect the 100% share 
distribution paid on April 14, 1992. In thousands, except per share data.
#### A. SMITH & SONS CARPET CO. v. SKINNER.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 27, 1895.)

1. Injunction Pendente Lite—When Proper.

In an action to compel defendant to assign to plaintiffs a certain patent, the moving affidavit showed the patent to belong, in equity, to plaintiffs, while defendant held the title, and that defendant refused to assign the patent to plaintiffs. *Held,*that an injunction pendente lite against defend-, ant’s transferring the patent to third persons was proper.

3. Evidence—Judicial Notice.

The court will take judicial notice of the business of the patent office, and that patent No. 543,(559 is an issue of later date than No. 186,374.

Appeal from special term.

Action by A. Smith & Sons Carpet Company against one Skinner to compel defendant to assign to plaintiffs a certain patent. From an order enjoining defendant, pendente lite, from transferring the patent to third persons, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and DYKMAN and PRATT, JJ.

R. E. & A. J. Prime, for appellant.

John F. Braman, for respondents.

PRATT, J.

The special term places this case on the proper ground. The patent, No. 543,659, is shown by moving affidavits to belong, in equity, to plaintiffs, while the paper title is held by defendant. He refuses to assign, and upon these facts an injunction, pendente lite, against his transferring the patent to strangers is a matter of course. Strict proof that defendant threatens to sell is not required. From the face that defendant unjustly refuses to assign to plaintiffs, the court may well infer an intent to use the patent unlawfully.

It is objected that it is not specifically shown when the discovery covered by patent No. 543,659 was made, and, therefore, it may have been made before 1874, when the contract was executed upon which *1001plaintiffs’ rights depend. It is shown to be for an improvement on patent No. 186,374, issued in 1877. The court will take judicial notice of the course of business in the patent office, and that No. 543,659 is an issue of later date than No. 186,374. We think the appeal without merit.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs. All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 155 (Monday, August 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45796-45797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m. on August 18, 2021.

PLACE: Please use the following link for the live stream of meeting: 
https://tva.com/board/watch.

STATUS: Open, via live streaming only.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Meeting No. 21-03

    The TVA Board of Directors will hold a public meeting on August 18, 
2021. Due to the ongoing risks associated with the COVID-19 outbreak, 
the meeting will be streamed to the public. The meeting will be called 
to order at 10 a.m. ET to consider the agenda items listed below. TVA 
Board Chair John Ryder and TVA management will answer questions from 
the news media following the Board meeting.
    Public health concerns also require a change to the Board's public 
listening session. Although in-person comments from the public are not 
feasible, the Board is encouraging those wishing to express their 
opinions to submit written comments that will be provided to the Board 
members before the August 18 meeting. Written comments can be submitted 
through the same online system used to register to speak at previous 
listening sessions.

Agenda

1. Approval of minutes of the May 6, 2021 Board Meeting
2. Report of the Finance, Rates, and Portfolio Committee
    A. FY 2022 Pandemic recovery credit
    B. FY 2022 Financial plan and budget
    C. FY 2022 Bond issuance and financing authority
3. Report of the People and Performance Committee
    A. Corporate goals for FY 2022
4. Report of the Audit, Risk, and Regulation Committee
    A. FY 2022 External auditor selection
5. Report of the Nuclear Oversight Committee
    A. Financial assurance for nuclear decomissioning activities
6. Report of the External Relations Committee
7. Information Items

[[Page 45797]]

    A. Selection of Board Chair
    B. TVARS Board proposal--pension changes
8. Governance Items
    A. Committee structure and assignments
9. Report from President and CEO

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For more information: Please call 
Jim Hopson, TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, 
Tennessee. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing 
may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda 
Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

    Dated: August 11, 2021.
David Fountain,
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17597 Filed 8-12-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
HAGLER BAILLY,  INC. UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE]
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    
</LEGEND>
                      
                      
                             
                                   
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
                            
<CASH>                                         3,100,379
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,639,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,210,921
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               47,063,120
<PP&E>                                         5,823,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,711,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 58,314,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,496,460
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       90,311
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,651,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   58,314,785
<SALES>                                        73,261,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               73,261,785
<CGS>                                          55,868,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  55,868,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             774,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,277,179
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,301,686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,975,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                760,652
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,736,145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.70
        


</TABLE>
1 –ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

THE LANCE AND LINDA NEIBAUER

JOINT TRUST, by and through LANCE

NEIBAUER, as trustee,

Case No. 6:14-cv-01192-MC

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

MICHAEL J. KURGAN, an individual,

Defendant.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

In a December 16, 2014 order, the Court granted plaintiff Lance and Linda Neibauer 

Joint Trust’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was awarded $13,896.39 on its breach of 

contract claim and $46,730.36 on its intentional interference with contract claim. The opinion 

noted that the Trust was also entitled to costs and prejudgment and post-judgment interest. The 

court then issued a judgment in favor of plaintiff. See ECF No. 46.

The Trust now moves to amend or supplement that judgment. ECF No. 50. Defendant 

Michael J. Kurgan did not respond to the Trust’s motion, and the time to do so is passed. The 

Case 6:14-cv-01192-MC Document 55 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 2
2 –ORDER

Trust seeks costs of $1,438.04, prejudgment interest of $2,388.99, and post-judgment interest of 

$.406 per day, beginning December 17, 2014 and compounded annually. 

Costs are generally allowed to the prevailing party, in this case the Trust. Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(d)(1).The Trust includes a Bill of Costs, ECF No. 48, and a declaration in support, ECF No. 

49. All of the requested costs are recoverable by the prevailing party. See 28 U.S.C. § 1920. The 

Trust is therefore awarded $1,438.04 in costs. The Court agrees that the Trust is entitled to 

prejudgment interest of 9%. The Trust is awarded $2,388.88 in prejudgment interest as identified 

on pages three and four of the motion. See ECF No. 50. The Court agrees that the Trust is 

entitled to post-judgment interest at .23 percent (of $64,453.67) per annum, compounded 

annually. The Trust is therefore awarded $148.24 annually, which equals $.406 per day 

beginning December 17, 2014.

The Trust’s motion, ECF No. 50, is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 9th day of April, 2015.

 _

Michael McShane

United States District Judge

Case 6:14-cv-01192-MC Document 55 Filed 04/09/15 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10(a)  

                                                     ETS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ETSI  Proudly serving industry and        Providing: Environmental and
      government since 1947.              infrastructure products and
                                          services

January 20, 1998

Mr James B. Quarles
Goose Creek Valley Farm
Rural Route 1 Box 191-B
Montvale, VA 24122

Dear Jim:

We are pleased to offer you the position of Director, President and Chief
Executive Officer of ETS International, Inc., effective immediately.  The
term of office will be for a minimum of six (6) months with compensation to
include a salary of $11,000.00 per month ($132,000.00 per year), four weeks
paid vacation (to be taken as one week at the end of each fiscal quarter) and
other standard benefits as provided to ETS International officers and other
employees. You will receive full reimbursement of your business-related
expenses.  You are hereby provided the opportunity to purchase 400,000 shares
of ETS International at $.27 per share in the form of a private placement. 
In addition, you will be provided the option to acquire up to 350,000 shares
of ETS International Inc. at $. 50 per share.  These options are good for
five (5) years and exercisable at anytime during that period.

ETS International is aware that you currently serve as President and Chairman
of Q Enterprises, Inc.), which includes investments in Q BioChem, Q Microbial
and Q Organics. We understand that upon your acceptance of this offer, you
will appoint an attorney and an accountant to serve as trustees of Q
Enterprises in order to manage that entity on your behalf.

Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing below. We very much
look forward to your re-joining ETS International.

Sincerely,

ETS International, Inc,

s/Thomas W. Marmon  s/Coleman S. Lyttle  s/Navin D. Sheth s/Arthur B. Nunn, III
------------------  -------------------  ---------------- ---------------------
Director            Director             Director         Director

s/John C. Mycock    s/John D. McKenna                         
------------------  -------------------  ----------------
Director            Director             Director

Acceptance:


s/James B. Quarles
-------------------------
James B. Quarles  1/20/98
<PAGE>
NOTICE - DISMISSAL Page 1 of 2

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: crowell@kite.com

CROWELL LAW

P.O. Box 923

Salem, OR 97308

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC, and

MAXCON PRODUCTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DOE, a/k/a IP 76.115.46.230

Defendant.

 Case No.: 3:13-cv-00836-AA

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL 

FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

LR 7-1 Certification

Plaintiffs’ counsel and appearing counsel, Mr. Robert Swider, have conferred on this 

notice and Mr. Swider does not oppose dismissal of this matter by notice without prejudice.

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

No party having answered the complaint or having filed a motion for summary judgment, 

plaintiffs hereby dismiss this matter without prejudice and by notice pursuant to FRCP 

41(a)(1)(A)(i).

///

///

Case 3:13-cv-00836-AA Document 21 Filed 12/19/13 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#: 118
NOTICE - DISMISSAL Page 2 of 2

DATED: December 19, 2013

Respectfully submitted,

CROWELL LAW

/s/Carl D. Crowell

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

Of attorneys for the plaintiffs

Case 3:13-cv-00836-AA Document 21 Filed 12/19/13 Page 2 of 2 Page ID#: 119
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                CERTIFICATION

I, John N. Hanna certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of YoCream International,
Inc. (the small business issuer);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (small business issuers fourth quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
controls over financial reporting.


/s/ John N. Hanna                                    Dated:  January 31, 2005
John N. Hanna, Chief Executive Officer
ex1016nog.htm


EXHIBIT 10.20

NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHT (SAR) AWARD

 


	
Name of Employee:
	
[Name]

	  	  
	
Name of Plan:
	
2006 AI Incentive Plan

	  	  
	
Number of SAR’s:
	
xxx,xxx

	  	  
	
Grant Price Per SAR:
	
$ XX.XX

	  	  
	
Date of SAR Grant:
	
November 19, 2008

	  	  
	
Vesting Schedule:
	
50% on 11/19/2009

	  	
25% on 11/19/2010

	  	
25% on 11/19/2011

	  	  
	
Expiration Date:
	
December 19, 2018




 

ASHLAND INC ("Ashland") hereby confirms the grant of a Stock Appreciation Right (“SAR”) award (“Award”) to the above-named Employee ("Employee"). This Award entitles Employee to receive Ashland stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of Ashland Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”),
as determined by the closing price of the Common Stock as reported on the Composite Tape of the New York Stock Exchange, on the date the SAR is exercised over the grant price of the Common Stock, with an aggregate value equal to the excess of the fair market value of one share of Common Stock over the exercise price specified in such SAR multiplied by the number of SARs of Common Stock covered by such SAR or portion thereof which is so surrendered.

 

This Award is granted under, and is subject to, all the terms and conditions of the Plan. Copies of the Plan and related Prospectus are available for your review on FirstHand, Ashland’s intranet site.

 

This grant of Options is subject to your on-line acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement through the Fidelity website by December 31, 2008.

 



 



	 ASHLAND INC.	 	 	 	 
	
        
	 	 	
 
	 
	
By:__________________________________________
Sherwood J. Reese 

Sherwood.reese@comcast.net 

Drew L. Johnson, P.C. 

sherwoodreese@comcast.net 

1700 Valley River Drive 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 434-6466 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT COURT 

CHRISTOPHER A. WARD, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration, 

Defendant. 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

Civil No. 6:14-cv-1079-AC 

ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES 

PURSUANT TO EAJA 

After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby 

grants that Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney the sum of $6222.57 upon verification 

that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA 

awards fees subject "to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal 

debts") for full settlement of all claims for fees under BAJA. 

1- ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO BAJA 

Case 6:14-cv-01079-AC Document 23 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 2
If Plaintiff has no such federal debt, payment of $6222.57 shall be made to Plaintiff's 

attorneys, Drew L. Johnson, PC, and mailed to their office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, 

OR 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be 

made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel's office at the address provided above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of Septe7- , 20111

·5. 

~- Jj, ( jj----

PRESENTED BY: 

By: Isl DREW L. JOHNSON 

Drew L. Johnson, OSB #75200 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

United ~ates Magistrate Judge 

2 - ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

Case 6:14-cv-01079-AC Document 23 Filed 09/18/15 Page 2 of 2