alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
    HAGLER BAILLY, INC. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
    TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
                                   REFERENCE]
                          TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
                 
                       
                                   

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                                         2,043,567
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,319,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                   884,790
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,247,705
<PP&E>                                         3,229,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                 344,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 33,563,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,606,047
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       60,717
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,564,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   33,563,812
<SALES>                                        75,395,711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               75,395,711
<CGS>                                          59,745,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  59,745,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,304,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,060,513)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,122,272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,182,785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                145,904
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,036,881)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.55)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JOSEPH D. NORTHUP, 2:14-cv-01639-PK

Petitioner, ORDER

v. 

 

JERI TAYLOR,

 Respondent.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and

Recommendation (#51) on August 8, 2016, in which he recommends

the Court deny Petitioner Joseph C. Northrup's Petition (#2) for

Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, dismiss this

matter with prejudice, and deny a certificate of appealability. 

Petitioner filed timely Objections to the Findings and

Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make

1 - ORDER

Case 2:14-cv-01639-PK Document 59 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 3
a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's

report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561

F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

In his Objections Petitioner relies on the arguments

contained in his Petition, Brief in Support of Petition, and

Reply to Response to Petition. Petitioner, pro se, also filed a

Supplemental Objections/Made in Affidavit Form (#56) in support

of his Objections. This Court has carefully considered

Petitioner's Objections and Supplemental Objections filed pro se

and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings

and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and

Recommendation (#51) and, therefore, DENIES Petitioner’s Petition

(#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254,

DISMISSES this matter with prejudice, and DENIES a certificate of

appealability on the basis that Petitioner has not made a

2 - ORDER

Case 2:14-cv-01639-PK Document 59 Filed 11/23/16 Page 2 of 3
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 23rd day of November, 2016.

 s/ Anna J. Brown 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

3 - ORDER

Case 2:14-cv-01639-PK Document 59 Filed 11/23/16 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:04-cv-01954 Document 73 Filed 02/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
# C_2005261EN.01000501.xml

| 20.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/5

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2005/C 261/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

SWEDEN

Operating licences revoked

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Swedjet Airways AB
  556528-2687 | Gäskullevägen 6 |
| SE-445 52 Surte |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Swedjet Airways AB

556528-2687

Gäskullevägen 6

SE-445 52 Surte

passengers, mail, cargo

1.9.2005

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Stanson Air AB
  556394-5921 | Box 7062 |
| SE-161 07 Bromma |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Stanson Air AB

556394-5921

Box 7062

SE-161 07 Bromma

passengers, mail, cargo

7.3.2005

Polar Helikopter i Kiruna AB

556461-4518

| Box 170 |
| --- |
| SE-981 23 Kiruna |

Box 170

SE-981 23 Kiruna

passengers, mail, cargo

9.3.2005

Flyg AB Göta Vingar

556497-3161

| Timmermansgatan 43 |
| --- |
| SE-118 55 Stockholm |

Timmermansgatan 43

SE-118 55 Stockholm

passengers, mail, cargo

4.7.2005

---

(1)  OJ No L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,462
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          29,620
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,245,598
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,155,949
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,537,431
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,224,184
<SHORT-TERM>                                   141,520
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             55,378
<LONG-TERM>                                    923,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           340
<OTHER-SE>                                     193,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,537,431
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 21,906
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               19,802
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                41,708
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,470
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,587
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,121
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      795
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,353
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,755
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,755
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.98
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,038
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,950
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  9,993
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,088
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      287
<RECOVERIES>                                        59
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,655
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,413
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            242
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crops Pathology and Genetics Research: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Outreach Events
                        UC Davis Picnic Day
                                    Kinders go to College
                                    STEM Girls
                                    Future Scientist Program
                                    Agriculture Future of America
                                    Wallace-Carver Fellowship
                                    Young Scholars Program
                                    Annual Awards Banquet
                    About Us
                        About Us
                                    Our Mission
                                    Principal InvestigatorsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Crops Pathology and Genetics Research People & Locations







Lynne M Pearson
                        Crops Pathology and Genetics Research

                        




                        
                        Secretary
                        Phone: (530) 754-5849
                        
                        
                        Fax: (530) 754-7195(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Order entered September 17, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01153-CV

PHOENIX ENERGY, INC. AND JOSEPH J. RING, III, Appellants

V.

BREITLING ROYALTIES CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-11432

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ petition for interlocutory appeal and motion to stay trial. 

We ORDER appellee to file any response no later than September 22, 2014. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### Albert L. Hanscom, Respondent, *v.*Mortimer Hendricks, Appellant.

(Submitted October 24,1890;

decided December 2, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March 29, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

*Abram Kling*for appellant.

*Charles E. Hughes*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     to the
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       of
                         JEAN PHILIPPE FRAGRANCES, INC.
                Pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law


              Jean Philippe Fragrances, Inc. hereby certifies that:

     A. The name of the Corporation is Jean Philippe Fragrances, Inc. (the
"Corporation"), and its original Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the
Secretary of State of Delaware on May 6, 1985.

     B. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended in order to
change the name of the Corporation. To accomplish the foregoing amendment,
Article FIRST is stricken out in its entirety, and the new Article FIRST is
substituted in lieu thereof as follows:

     FIRST. The name of the Corporation is INTER PARFUMS, INC.

     C. The foregoing Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
the Corporation was authorized pursuant to Section 141(b) of the Delaware
Corporation Law by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors
of the Corporation present at a meeting at which a quorum was present followed
by the affirmative vote of a majority of all of the outstanding shares Common
Stock of the Corporation entitled to vote on the said Amendment to the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation at a meeting at which a quorum was present pursuant
to Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

     D. This Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation shall be effective upon the filing of same with the Secretary of
State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have subscribed this document on the date set forth
below and do hereby affirm, under the penalties of perjury, that the statements
contained therein have been examined by us and are true and correct.


Dated: July 13, 1999


                                 /c/ Jean Madar
                                 --------------
                                 Jean Madar, Chief Executive Officer


                                 /s/ Annie Failler
                                 -----------------
                                 Annie Failler, Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Springs, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Rockland County (Gallucci, J.), both rendered August 4, 1981, convicting him of attempted *692burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 129/80, and burglary in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under indictment No. 202/80, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel is granted leave to withdraw as counsel (see, *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|                                               
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                            
|Cornelis F. Wit                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

May 15, 2006
1 – OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

MARIE WESTROPE and REGGIE 

KELLY, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated,

No. 3:14-cv-00604-YY

Plaintiffs, 

OPINION AND ORDER

v. 

RINGLER ASSOCIATES, INC., et 

al., 

 Defendants. 

MOSMAN, J., 

On February 21, 2017, Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued her Findings and 

Recommendation (“F&R”) [168], recommending that (1) Defendants Ringler and Hoffman’s 

Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim [131] should be DENIED as MOOT as to former 

Plaintiff Culhane, and otherwise should be DENIED, and (2) Defendants Casey, Bell, Mathews, 

Farber, Weber, Kelly, and Blattenberg’s Motion to Dismiss [138] should be DENIED in part and 

GRANTED in part. Neither party filed objections. 

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 
2 – OPINION AND ORDER

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon careful review, I agree with Judge You’s recommendations and ADOPT the F&R 

[168] as my own opinion. Defendants Ringler and Hoffman’s Motion to Dismiss [131] is 

DENIED as MOOT as to former Plaintiff Culhane, and otherwise DENIED. Defendants Casey, 

Bell, Mathews, Farber, Weber, Kelly, and Blattenberg’s Motion to Dismiss [138] is DENIED in 

part to the extent they join Ringler and Hoffman’s Motion to Dismiss [138] for failure to state a 

claim, and otherwise GRANTED in part for lack of personal jurisdiction. The claims against 

Defendants Casey, Bell, Mathews, Farber, Weber, Kelly, and Blattenberg are DISMISSED with 

prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 11th day of April, 2017. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman________ 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 152 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 152

  To provide for the relief and payment of an equitable claim to the 
          estate of Dr. Beatrice Braude of New York, New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 1997

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself and Mr. D'Amato) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the relief and payment of an equitable claim to the 
          estate of Dr. Beatrice Braude of New York, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF EQUITABLE CLAIM TO THE ESTATE OF DR. BEATRICE 
              BRAUDE.

    (a) Payment.--From funds appropriated to the Department of Justice 
for fiscal year 1997, the Attorney General of the United States shall 
pay $200,000 to the estate of Dr. Beatrice Braude of New York, New York 
as an equitable claim as found by the hearing officer of the Court of 
Federal Claims pursuant to Congressional reference proceedings under 
sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code, and 
subsequently stipulated by the Department of Justice, relating to the 
discharge and disbarment of Dr. Beatrice Braude from Federal 
employment.
    (b) Full Settlement.--The payment made under subsection (a) shall 
constitute full settlement of all legal and equitable claims by the 
estate of Dr. Beatrice Braude of New York, New York, against the United 
States.
    (c) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.
    (d) Attorney's Fees.--No part of the amount appropriated in this 
section in excess of 10 percent thereof shall be paid or delivered to 
or received by any agent or attorney on account of services rendered in 
connection with this section, and the same shall be unlawful, any 
contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Violation of the provisions 
of this subsection is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed 
$1,000.
                                 <all>
```