alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Thomas W. Deckman, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 107175.)

[942 NYS2d 849]

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Michael E. Hudson, J.), entered October 4, 2010 in a personal injury action. The interlocutory judgment apportioned liability after trial.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at the Court of Claims. Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Bindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 10.50   ***Text Omitted and Filed SeparatelyConfidential Treatment
RequestedUnder 17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4)
and240.24b-2(b)(1)
 Amendment Agreement Seller Buyer
 :
    Section 3.15
 Transfer to Schedule 3.15
 Schedule 3.15 Exhibit A
 Schedule 4.5(a) Exhibit B
 Schedule 6.6 Exhibit C
 Entire Agreement
 Severability
 *Confidential Treatment Requested   under
17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4) and   240.24b-2(b)(1)




---



##### 



Counterparts
 Governing Law
    2




---



##### 



IDM PHARMA, INC.By:

    /s/ Emile LoriaName:   Emile LoriaTitle:   President and Chief Business OfficerPHARMEXA INC.By:

        /s/ Marc HertzName:   Marc Hertz, Ph.D.Title:   Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 Schedule 3.15. Equipment and Agreements to be Transferred to .
 (a) Equipment:
  (b) Agreements:
  *Confidential Treatment Requested   under
17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4) and   240.24b-2(b)(1)




---



##### 



Exhibit B
 Schedule 4.5(a). Material Contracts and Required Consents for Material Contracts.
 Material Contracts Not Requiring Consent:
 
 *Confidential Treatment Requested   under
17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4) and   240.24b-2(b)(1)




---



##### 



Material Contracts Requiring Consent:
  *Confidential Treatment Requested   under
17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4) and   240.24b-2(b)(1)




---



##### 



*Confidential Treatment Requested   under
17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4) and   240.24b-2(b)(1)




---



##### 



Exhibit C
 Schedule 6.6. Consents Required to Close.
  *Confidential Treatment Requested   under
17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4) and   240.24b-2(b)(1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

CAROL MADSEN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN L. COLVIN, 

Defendant. 

PANNER, District Judge: 

Case No. 3:13-cv-819-CL 

ORDER 

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed Findings and 

Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 

U. S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). When either party 

objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and 

Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination 

of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., 

Inc., 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). 

1 - ORDER 

Case 3:13-cv-00819-CL Document 27 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 2
Here, plaintiff objects to the Findings and Recommendation, 

so I have reviewed this matter de novo. I agree with Magistrate 

Judge Clarke that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner's 

finding that plaintiff is not disabled. Accordingly, I ADOPT the 

Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke. 

CONCLUSION 

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (#22) 

is adopted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this~ day of June, 2014. 

OWEN M. FANNER 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

2 - ORDER 

Case 3:13-cv-00819-CL Document 27 Filed 06/30/14 Page 2 of 2
#### Juan Carlos ESTRADA-LUIS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-71828.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 21, 2011.

Michael S. Cabrera, Esquire, Law Offices of Michael S. Cabrera, Huntington Park, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Brooke Maurer, Trial, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*227Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Carlos Estrada-Luis, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We review for abuse of discretion, *Arrieta v. INS,*117 F.3d 429, 430 (9th Cir.1997), and we deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying Estrada-Luis’ motion to reopen where the record contains a certified mail receipt for the notice of hearing bearing Estrada-Luis’ signature, and Estrada-Luis failed to address this evidence in his affidavit. *See Arrieta,*117 F.3d 429 at 431-32 (rebuttal of the strong presumption of effective service arising from notice by certified mail requires showing of nondelivery or improper delivery by the Postal Service); *Matter of Grijalva,*21 I. & N. Dec. 27, 37 (BIA 1995).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAMION GLENROY DAVIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 369 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agroecosystem Management Research: Lincoln, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lincoln, Nebraska Agroecosystem Management Research People & Locations







Tim A Kettler
                        Agroecosystem Management Research

                        




                        
                        DATA BASE ADMR
                        Phone: (402) 472-7321
                        
                        
                        Fax: (402) 472-4020(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of 1 Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2799

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Isaac Rivera, also known as Ramon * District of Minnesota. Ruiz, also known as Ramon Ruiz * Corrales, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 23, 1997 Filed: October 30, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
In 1994, I saac Rivera pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine with intent t o distribute, in violati on of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (1994), and possessing a firearm in relation to drug trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1994). The District Court 1-2-

sentencedRivera to consecutive prison terms of 70 months on the drug count and 60 mo nths on the firearm count. Upon Rivera & s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) motion, th e District Court vacated his firearm conviction in light of Bailey v. United States , 116 S. Ct
. 501, 506 (1995). The Court then resentenced Rivera on the drug count to 8 4 months imprisonment, after imposing a two-level enhancement for the possession of a firearm. SeeU.S. Senten cing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1) (1995) (providing for two-level enhancement if firearm involved). Rivera appeals, arguin g that the District Court lacked jurisdiction to resentence him on the unchallenged drug convicti on, as the purpose and scope of section 2255 do notau thorize such an action, and that his challenge to the firearm conviction did no t bring th e entire “sentencing package” before the court. Rivera & s arguments ar e fore closedby United States v. Harrison , 113 F.3d 135, 137-38 (8th Cir. 1997 ) (concluding that § 2255 allows enhancement of unchall enged drug sentence for firearm possession after vacating firearm conviction in light of Bailey ), and therefore we affirm the District Court & s judgment. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, John E. Gherty, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Land O'Lakes,
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the third quarter of
     2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
     affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:

          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.


Date:  April 26, 2004
                                          By: /s/ John E. Gherty
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          John E. Gherty
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45479

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

STEPHEN V. CROUSE ,
Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: September 25, 2018
Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Oneida County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn , District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight years, for aggravated assault on certain law enforcement personnel, six months for domestic b attery , and one year each for resisting and obstructing and interfering with a 911 call, affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________ PER CURIAM Stephen V. Crouse pleaded guilty to felony aggravated assault on certain law enforcement personnel , Idaho C ode § § 18

- 915(1), 18

- 905, and 18

- 906, misdemeanor domestic battery , I.C. § § 18

- 918(3) and 18

- 903(a)
, misdemeanor interfering wit h a 911 call, I.C. § 18

- 1501(2), and misdemeanor resisting and /or obstructing an officer , I.C. § 18

- 705 . The district

court imposed a unified ten

- year sentence, with eight years determinate, for the aggravated battery conviction to run consecutively to an unrelated sentence. The district court imposed six
months on the domestic battery and one year each for the resisting and obstructing and2 interfering with a 911 call convictions . The sentences were ordered to run concurrently with the aggravated assault sentence

. Crouse appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 1 14, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Crouse ’s judg ment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
InfraCorps, Inc. and Subsidiaries


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated June 4, 1999
(relating to the consolidated financial statements of InfraCorps, Inc. and
Subsidiaries and included in the March 31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
InfraCorps, Inc. and Subsidiaries), into the Form S-8 for the 1994 Nonstatutory
Stock Option Plan of InfraCorps, Inc. and Subsidiaries (formerly ETS
International, Inc. and Subsidiaries).




/s/ Goodman & Company, L.L.P.
-----------------------------


Norfolk Virginia
July 12, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 155 (Monday, August 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 45724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rayos del Sol Solar Project, LLC.........  EG21-137-000
Guernsey Power Station LLC...............  EG21-138-000
Stony Creek Energy LLC...................  EG21-139-000
Orangeville Energy Storage LLC...........  EG21-140-000
Farmington Solar, LLC....................  EG21-141-000
Bluestone Wind, LLC......................  EG21-142-000
Ball Hill Wind Energy, LLC...............  EG21-143-000
White Mesa Wind, LLC.....................  EG21-144-000
Rockhaven Wind Project, LLC..............  EG21-145-000
Wheatridge Solar Energy Center, LLC......  EG21-146-000
Black Rock Wind Force, LLC...............  EG21-147-000
BRP Ranchtown Bess LLC...................  EG21-148-000
Hickory Park Solar, LLC..................  EG21-149-000
Priddy Wind Project, LLC.................  EG21-150-000
Iron Star Wind Project, LLC..............  EG21-151-000
Blackwell Wind Energy, LLC...............  EG21-152-000
Fort Bend Solar LLC......................  EG21-153-000
Big River Solar, LLC.....................  EG21-154-000
Mulberry BESS LLC........................  EG21-155-000
Ranchland Wind Project, LLC..............  EG21-156-000
BT Coniglio Solar, LLC...................  EG21-157-000
Assembly Solar III, LLC..................  EG21-158-000
Point Beach Solar, LLC...................  EG21-159-000
TG East Wind Project LLC.................  EG21-160-000
Hubbard Wind, LLC........................  EG21-161-000
Phoenix 500, LLC.........................  EG21-162-000
Phoenix 820, LLC.........................  EG21-163-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of July 2021, the status of the 
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became 
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) 
(2020).

    Dated: August 10, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17486 Filed 8-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Introduction Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Main Menu
                        Home page
                                    About the Plant Introduction Station
                                    Crops
                                    Entomology
                                    Facilities
                                    Pathology
                                    Seed Storage
                                    Seed Viability
                                    Annual Reports
                                    Ash Conservation ProjectSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa Plant Introduction Research People & Locations







Samuel  Flomo
                        Plant Introduction Research

                        




                        
                        AGRICULTURAL SPECIALIST I
                        Phone: (515) 294-3800
                        
                        
                        Fax: (515) 294-1903(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-91,753-01 & -02

EX PARTE JARIOUS ZSONTAE WILLIAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 369CR-18-33939-A & 369CR-16-32725-A

IN THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT FROM ANDERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to two drug offenses and was sentenced to imprisonment. 

Applicant, through habeas counsel, filed these application for writs of habeas corpus in the county

of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art.

11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his pleas were involuntarybecause trial counsel

provided ineffective assistance. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. 

Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to
2

respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance by explaining counsel’s representation of

Applicant, including applicable strategy and tactical decisions. In developing the record, the trial

court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Applicant’s

habeas claims. The trial court may also make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: October 21, 2020

Do not publish