alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Genetics Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Crop Genetics Research People & Locations







La'Kisha  Davis
                        Crop Genetics Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (662) 686-3078
                        
                        
                        Fax: (662) 686-5218(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
##### 



Exhibit 23

Consent of the Independent Public Accountants

HearUSA Inc.
West Palm Beach, Florida

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (filed September 13, 1994), Form S-8 (filed July 19,
1996), Form S-3 (File No. 333-04303), Form S-3 (File No. 333-04639), Form S-3
(File No. 333-11429) , Form S-3 (File No. 333-18753), Form S-3 (File No.
333-24357), Form S-3 (File No. 333-25169), Form S-3 (File No. 333-6457) and
Form S-3 (File No. 333-38862) of our report dated March 14, 2003, relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of
HearUSA Inc., appearing in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for year
ended December 28, 2002.

|                         |  |                 
|------------------------ |  | ----------------
|West Palm Beach, Florida |  | BDO Seidman, LLP
|March 27, 2003           |  |                 

75
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit: Griffin, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Griffin, Georgia Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit People & Locations







Ken  Manley

((uga))
                        Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit

                        




                        
                        Collaborator
                        Phone: (770) 412-4775
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Order entered March 8, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01115-CV

MINGTEL INC. D/B/A AZPEN INNOVVATION, Appellant

V.

COMERICA BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-11481

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Antionette Reagor’s March 4, 2021 

request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the 

motion and ORDER the record be filed no later than April 5, 2021.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
**Exhibit      10.1**

**Amendment      to Outside Director Compensation Plan**

|   | **·** | increased the annual retainer fee from $25,000 to              $35,000; |
|--------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **·** | increased                annual committee chair fees to $16,000 for the chairman of the Audit                Committee, $8,000 for the chairman of the Compensation Committee                and                $8,000 for the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance                Committee (in each case, from                $5,000); |
|--------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **·** | provided                that annual retainers and committee chair fees will be paid solely                in                cash, eliminating the ability of directors to elect payment in the                form of                stock options; and |
|--------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | **·** | increased                the annual long-term incentive                compensation fee from $20,000 to $75,000 and changed the form of                payment                from stock options to restricted stock, which restricted stock will                be                issued annually after the election of directors at the annual meeting                of                stockholders based on the closing price on that date of the meeting                and                with a three year vesting of 331⁄3% on each of the first, second and third                anniversaries of the date of grant. |
|--|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 153 (Thursday, August 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 44353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-980-001.
    Applicants: Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation, Fundare Resources 
Operating Company, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to Joint Petition For Temporary Waiver, et 
al. of Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation, et al.
    Filed Date: 8/5/21.
    Accession Number: 20210805-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1018-000.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Remove GT&C Section 26 
Reservation Surcharge to be effective 9/4/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/4/21.
    Accession Number: 20210804-5014.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/16/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1019-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Remove Expired Agmts eff 8-5-
2021 to be effective 8/5/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/5/21.
    Accession Number: 20210805-5029.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/17/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1020-000.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Sheet No. 206 Clean Up Filing 
to be effective 7/23/2021.
    Filed Date: 8/5/21.
    Accession Number: 20210805-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/17/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 6, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17210 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<logo>Price Waterhouse LLP	
NationsBank Corporate Center
Suite 5400
Charlotte, NC 28202

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

January 29, 1997

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of NationsBanc Mortgage Corporation

We have examined management's assertion about NationsBanc 
Mortgage Corporation's compliance with the minimum 
servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers 
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation 
Program for Mortgage Bankers USAP) as of and for the year 
ended December 31, 1996, included in the accompanying 
management assertion. Management is responsible for the 
Company's compliance with those minimum servicing 
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on 
management's assertion about the Company's compliance 
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards 
established by the American Institute of Certified Public 
Accountants and, accordingly included examining, on a text 
basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the 
minimum servicing standards and performing such other 
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. 
We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis 
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal 
determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum 
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company 
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards 
as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 is fairly 
stated, in all material respects.

/s/Price Waterhouse, LLP
NationsBanc, Mortgage Corporation
**Exhibit 32.2**





**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted**


**pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eclipsys Corporation
      (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
      Robert J. Colletti, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      that:





(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 23, 2007





/s/
      Robert J. Colletti


Robert
      J.
      Colletti


Senior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and


Chief
      Accounting Officer
#### MANNING v. MANNING.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 14, 1896.)

No opinion. Order modified by providing that respondent, as a condition of granting the order, pay to the appellant $10 cost's of motion, and in addition thereto the costs and disbursements of the appeal from the judgment, and that the respondent also stipulate that she will not tax against the appellant any costs or disbursements in the action heretofore accrued, in case she recovers a judgment.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00437

- CV

D AVIE H ARRISON

, Appellant

V

.

S TATE F ARM M UTUAL A UTOMOBILE

I NSURANCE C O

., Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 348th District

Court

of Tarrant County (348

- 299043

- 18)

January 9, 2020

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considere d the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CUR IAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          14,552
<SECURITIES>                                    20,599
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                       958
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,320
<PP&E>                                           5,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,012
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,571
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,368
<SALES>                                         36,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,035
<CGS>                                            4,493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (687)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,818
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7210

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRYAN KEITH NOEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cr-00057-RJC-1; 1:16-cv-00406-

RJC)

Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryan Keith Noel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bryan Keith Noel seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to 

conduct discovery and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating 

that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Noel has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
State Land Planning Bureau of Shenzben City, Bao-an Branch, Official
                                    Document

                         Shen-Gui-Tu-Bao-Zi [1996]14 Hao

---------------------------------------*----------------------------------------
                         In Response to your application
                    for extending the construction time limit

Shenzhen Jiadianbao Electrical Products Co., Ltd.:

We have received your application letter. After study, we approve to extend the
construction time limit on the industrial use land of your company which was
specified on Shen-Di-Ho-Zi [l995] 4-029 Hao Assignment Contract. That means you
must complete 40% of the construction before April, 1997; and all the
construction must be completed in the year 2000.
      End of Response

         /State Land Planning Bureau of Shenzhen City, Bao-an Branch/

                                          January 30, 1996

Key Words: Urban & Rural Construction     Land Approval

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C.C.: Deputy District Manager Ho
C.C.: Land Administration Division, Construction Design Management Division,
      Real Estate Rights Division of Bao-an Branch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               (Print 12 copies)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BRIAN FLANAGAN,

Respondent

v.

MINE RUN, INC. D/B/A EAGLE STREAM 

APARTMENTS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 38 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### In the Matter of Marat Martynov, Petitioner, v John G. Ingram et al., Respondents.

[946 NYS2d 882]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit John G. Ingram, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kangs County, from enforcing an order dated March 6, 2012, in a criminal action entitled *People v Martynov,*pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment No. 199/10, which disqualified the petitioner’s attorney as defense counsel in that action.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *see Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]).

The extraordinary remedy of a writ of prohibition does not lie to seek collateral review of the issue of disqualification of the petitioner’s attorney *(see Matter of Lipari v Owens,*70 NY2d 731, 733 [1987]; *Matter of Murray v Hudson,*43 AD3d 936 [2007]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.