alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-- DECLARATION OF RICHARD COHN-LEE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’s

 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

1

Rich Cohn-Lee, OSB No. 952331

E-mail: Rich@hungerfordlaw.com

Joel E. Hungerford, OSB No. 140940

E-mail: Joel@hungerfordlaw.com

THE HUNGERFORD LAW FIRM

PO Box 3010

Oregon City, Oregon 97045

Telephone: (503) 650-7990

Facsimile: (503) 655-1429

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION

GRANTS PASS SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STUDENT,

Defendant.

Civil No. 1:14-cv-01115-CL

DECLARATION OF RICHARD COHNLEE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY 

RESTRAINING ORDER

I, RICHARD COHN-LEE, declare as follows:

1. I make this declaration on personal knowledge and my review of the records in 

this action and, if called as a witness in this action, could and would competently testify to the 

matters and documents described herein.

Case 1:14-cv-01115-PA Document 2-4 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 3
 -- DECLARATION OF RICHARD COHN-LEE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’s

 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

2

2. I make this declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining 

Order.

3. I am the attorney for plaintiff Grants Pass School District in the above-captioned 

matter.

4. True and correct copies of the following documents are attached hereto:

a. PDF documents of the official transcript from ODE DP 14-102 and ODE 

DP 14-104; and

b. Posthearing Briefs from Grants Pass School District and from the Parent 

for ODE DP 14-104; and

c. ALJ Bernadette House’s Final Order from ODE DP 14-102.

5. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Oregon that the 

foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed by me on this 14th day of 

July, 2014 at Oregon City, Oregon.

/s/ Richard Cohn-Lee_________ 

Richard Cohn-Lee

Case 1:14-cv-01115-PA Document 2-4 Filed 07/14/14 Page 2 of 3
 -- DECLARATION OF RICHARD COHN-LEE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’s

 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I served the foregoing DECLARATION OF RICHARD COHNLEE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY AND FOR ATTORNEYS’ 

FEES on the following named person on the date indicated below by:

[ ] mailing with postage prepaid;

[ ] hand delivery;

[ x ] electronic delivery;

[ ] overnight delivery

to said person a true copy thereof at their last-known address indicated below:

Raymond Parenteau

1370 SW David Drive

Grants Pass, OR 97527

 Pro Se for Defendant

DATED: July 14, 2014.

THE HUNGERFORD LAW FIRM

/s/ Rich Cohn-Lee_______________ 

Richard G. Cohn-Lee, OSB No. 952331

E-mail: Rich@hungerfordlaw.com

Joel E. Hungerford, OSB No. 140940

E-mail: Joel@hungerfordlaw.com

Telephone: (503) 650-7990

Facsimile: (503) 655-1429

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff–Appellant

Case 1:14-cv-01115-PA Document 2-4 Filed 07/14/14 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 File Nos. 33-80607 and 333-39149)  pertaining to the 1995 Share Option
Plan and the 1996 Employee Share Purchase Plan of Saville Systems PLC and in the
related  Prospectuses  of our reports dated January 22, 1998 with respect to the
consolidated  financial  statements  of  Saville  Systems  PLC  incorporated  by
reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,1997.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Saville Systems PLC
listed in Item 14(a)(2).  This schedule is the  responsibility  of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a whole,  present fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

ERNST & YOUNG

/s/ Ernst & Young

Galway, Ireland
March 23, 1998
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




Sections 1 and 11 of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement are hereby amended effective the
2nd day of December, 2008 (“Amendment”) by and between the parties to the Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement (as named below), effective the 1st day of November, 2004 (“Employment
Agreement”) for the purpose of making the following changes:



Section 1 shall be revised to read as follows:



Section 1. Term. Employer hereby continues the employment of Employee and Employee hereby
accepts continued employment with Employer for a term (the “Term”) beginning on the effective date
hereof (“Commencement Date”) and continuing until December 31, 2011.



Section 11 shall be revised as follows in the second full paragraph thereof: Line 12 — the word
“termination” shall be removed and replaced with “Term” and Line 14 — the words “at any time”
shall be removed and replaced with “upon 90 days prior written notice”.



Except as set forth above in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in
full force and effect.



As evidenced by signature below, the parties to the Agreement and this Amendment agree to the terms
and conditions of this Amendment, both as to form and substance.



EMPLOYEE:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature:
	 	/s/ Christopher J. Reading	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Print Name: Christopher J. Reading	 	 	 	 






EMPLOYER:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	/s/ Daniel C. Arnold	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Daniel C. Arnold, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Page 1 – STIPULATED MOTION TO POSTPONE DEADLINES AND SET A FURTHER 

JOINT STATUS REPORT

PORTLAND CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

1221 SW 4TH AVENUE, RM 430 

PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 

(503) 823-4047

TRACY REEVE, Oregon State Bar ID Number 891123 

City Attorney 

Email: Tracy.Reeve@portlandoregon.gov

J. SCOTT MOEDE, Oregon State Bar ID Number 934816 

Chief Deputy City Attorney 

Email: Scott.Moede@portlandoregon.gov

KENNETH A. MCGAIR, Oregon State Bar ID Number 990148 

Senior Deputy City Attorney 

Email: Ken.McGair@portlandoregon.gov

Office of City Attorney 

1221 SW Fourth Avenue, Room 430 

Portland, OR 97204 

Tele: 503-823-4047 

Fax: 503-823-3089 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Portland 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal 

corporation of the State of Oregon, 

 PLAINTIFF, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, and RASIER, LLC, its wholly 

owned subsidiary, 

 DEFENDANTS.

3:14-cv-01958-SI

STIPULATED MOTION TO POSTPONE 

DEADLINES AND SET A FURTHER 

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

In accordance with Local Rule 7-1(b), the parties, plaintiff City of Portland and defendants 

Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC (“Uber”), hereby jointly move this Court as follows: 

1. The parties request that the Court Order a Joint Status Report to be filed on 

September 18, 2015. 

2. The parties request that the deadlines for actions and responses, including 

responses to the Complaint and to requests for discovery, be postponed until fourteen (14) days 

Case 3:14-cv-01958-SI Document 33 Filed 05/07/15 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 – STIPULATED MOTION TO POSTPONE DEADLINES AND SET A FURTHER 

JOINT STATUS REPORT

PORTLAND CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

1221 SW 4TH AVENUE, RM 430 

PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 

(503) 823-4047

after the submission of a Joint Status Report due September 18, 2015. That date is October 2, 

2015. 

3. The basis for this motion is that the parties anticipate that it may be possible to 

reach a permanent resolution of the issues in this case through the City’s legislative and 

regulatory processes and this additional time will permit the parties to pursue that resolution as 

outlined in greater detail in the Joint Status Report filed contemporaneously herewith. 

s/ Tracy Reeve s/ Harry Korrell 

Tracy Reeve, OSB #891123 Harry Korrell, WSBA #23173 

City Attorney Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 

City Attorney’s Office 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 

1221 SW Fourth Avenue, Room 430 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 

Portland, OR 97204 Tele: 206-757-8080 

Tele: 503-823-4047 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff Gregory A. Chaimov, OSB #822180 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 

Dated: May 7, 2015 1300 SW 5th Avenue 

Portland, OR 97201-5630 

Telephone: 503-241-2300 

Of Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: May 7, 2015 

Case 3:14-cv-01958-SI Document 33 Filed 05/07/15 Page 2 of 2
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 381 

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United States 

Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2012 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber 

of the United States Senate. 

1 Resolved, That paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules 

2 for the Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United 

3 States Capitol and Senate Office Buildings (prohibiting 

4 the taking of pictures in the Senate Chamber) be tempo5 rarily suspended for the sole and specific purpose of per6 mitting the Senate Photographic Studio to photograph the 

7 United States Senate in actual session on Tuesday, March 

8 20, 2012, at the hour of 2:15 p.m. 

9 SEC. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is au10 thorized and directed to make the necessary arrangements 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 381 ATS 

1 therefore, which arrangements shall provide for a min2 imum of disruption to Senate proceedings. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40285

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE FRANCISCO ROMERO-CALDERON,

a/k/a Jose Francisco Romero,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-96-CR-286-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Francisco Romero-Calderon (“Romero”) appeals from his

conviction by guilty plea of reentry following deportation. He

argues, for the first time on appeal, that the aggravated-felony

requirement for sentencing under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) makes that

subsection an offense separate from illegal entry after

deportation. Romero cannot demonstrate plain error, see United
No. 97-40285

-2-

States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en

banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1196 (1995); his contention is

foreclosed by our opinion in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera, 999

F.2d 943 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2006272EN.01S00301.xml

| 9.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 9 November 2006, in Official Journal of the European Union C 272 A, the ‘Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — Sixth supplement to the 24th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/sales_agents_en.html).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L,C,CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu.

Image

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8073
CHARLES LLEWYLN, a/k/a Owen Oddman, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOBBY LEE MEDFORD, Sheriff, Buncombe County; LIEUTENANT EVANS, Facility Administration, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-54-MU) Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Llewyln, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* To the extent Appellant seeks to appeal the Court’s order denying § 1983 relief, his December 10, 2001 notice of appeal is untimely as to that order, which was entered on the court’s docket on July 30, 2001. Appellant never sought an extension of time in which to appeal or reopening of the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or (a)(6). We have construed Appellant’s informal brief filed in this Court as a timely notice of appeal from the denial of reconsideration. See Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248 (1992). 2 PER CURIAM: Charles Llewyln appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider its denial of relief under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Llewyln v. Medford , No. CA-01-54-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KENNETH DALE KLYM, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. ELDON VAIL, et al; Respondent - Appellee. No. 10-35374 D.C. No. 2:09-cv-05041-JLQ
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Justin L. Quackenbush, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 9, 2011 Seattle, Washington Before: REINHARDT, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Washington inmate Kenneth Klym appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 habeas corpus petition ch allenging his conviction and sentence for stalking and first-degree assault. Th e state appeals court’s affirmance of the 

# FILED
JUN 15 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALStrial court’s denial of his pro se motion for access to a law library did not unreasonably deny his clearly established federal rights, as determined by the Supreme Court, to self-representation, see Kane v. Garcia Espitia , 546 U.S. 9, 10 (2005), or to meaningful access to the courts, see Lewis v. Casey , 518 U.S. 343, 351 (1996). Accordingly, the district c ourt did not err in denying habeas relief.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001034237
<NAME>                                         AEROCENTURY IV, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           271,980
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    265,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 537,940
<PP&E>                                         3,679,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                   685,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,893,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            573,300
<BONDS>                                        4,869,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         243,420
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,792,490)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,893,230
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 428,080
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 573,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 623,940
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               365,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,134,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     225,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,359,880)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,359,880)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (5.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (5.59)



</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research: Columbia, MO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ARS Oppportunities
                        ARS OpportunitiesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Columbia, Missouri Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

People and Locations at Columbia, Missouri   [Expand All] [Collapse All]
  (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE : THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 050

- C R

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

C O R R E C T E D

O R D E R

The State of Texas has filed a mandamus petition challenging the trial court's grant of

certain time credits to real party in interest Crispen Hanson. We determined that no action would

be taken on the petition pending a response from Hanson and sent notic e to the attorney the State

identified as Hanson's attorney, Matthew DeKoatz.

On March 17, 2022, DeKoatz sent a letter to this Court informing us that he does not

currently represent Hanson. Consequently, we ABATE the mandamus proceeding and ORDER

the tr ial court to hold a hearing and:

1) determine whether Hanson is currently represented by counsel, and if not,

2) determine whether Hanson is indigent, and if so, whether it would appropriate to appoint

counsel for Hanson to represent him in this mandamus action.

The trial court is ordered to hold the hearing and make its findings within 15 days of the

date of this order. The trial court shall forward its findings to the district clerk. The district clerk

shall prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’ s record containing the findings and forward the

same to this Court on or before April 12, 2022. The court reporter is ordered to forward a

transcript of the hearing to this Court no later than April 12, 2022. The mandamus proceeding

will be reinstated by order of the Court after the findings are filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 8 th day of March , 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.