alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

LISA CORINNE CHAVEZ, 3:14-CV-01178-JE

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Commissioner, Social Security 

Administration,

 Defendant.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and

Recommendation (#24) on July 25, 2016, in which he recommends

this Court reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision denying 

Plaintiff's applications for supplemental security income

benefits and disability insurance benefits for further

administrative proceedings. The matter is now before this Court

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b).

 - ORDER 1

Case 3:14-cv-01178-JE Document 27 Filed 08/19/16 Page 1 of 2
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall,

561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not

find any error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and

Recommendation (#24). Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the

decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative

proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 19th day of August, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

 - ORDER 2

Case 3:14-cv-01178-JE Document 27 Filed 08/19/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Sam Kraynek, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2009



|                                     |  |                
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------
|                                     | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Sam Kraynek
|Sam Kraynek, Chief Financial Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Aquatic Animal Health Research: Auburn, AL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    IACUC
                        Summary - 2024 Jan
                                    Summary - 2023 Aug
                                    Summary - 2023 Jan
                                    Summary - 2022 July
                                    Summary - 2022 Jan
                                    Summary - 2021 July
                                    Summaries from Previous Years
                    ARS in Aubun
                        Auburn Location
                                    Soil Dynamics ResearchSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Auburn, Alabama Aquatic Animal Health Research People & Locations







Dustin C McKee
                        Aquatic Animal Health Research

                        




                        
                        BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone: (334) 887-3741
                        
                        
                        Fax: (334) 844-3740(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<Page>



                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated October 31, 2001 included in this Form 10-KSB,
into Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries' previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-90412, 33-74152 and 33-22661)
and on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-75370 and 33-25477).




                                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Princeton, New Jersey
December 19, 2001
EXHIBIT 23

                             Pinkham & Pinkham, P.C.
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


                         Report of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10KSB
of our report dated September 28, 1999 of the Tirex Corporation for the year
ended June 30, 1999.



                                      /s/ PINKHAM & PINKHAM, P.C.
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      Pinkham & Pinkham, P.C.
                                      Certified Public Accountants
December 3, 1999
Cranford, New Jersey












 514 Centennial Avenue, Cranford, NJ 07016 Tel: 908-653-1710 Fax: 908-653-1713
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cotton Production and Processing Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Cotton Production and Processing Research People & Locations







Cassandra  Ortiz
                        Cotton Production and Processing Research

                        




                        
                        Engineering Aid
                        Phone: (806) 746-5353
                        
                        
                        Fax: (806) 746-5028(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0052 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0052

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the joint text approved by the conciliation committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents (artificial optical radiation) (19th individual directive within the meaning of Article16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (PE-CONS 3668/3/2005 - C6-0001/2006 - 1992/0449B(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 290 E , 29/11/2006 P. 0085 - 0086 *

P6_TA(2006)0052

Exposure of workers to artificial optical radiation ***III

European Parliament legislative resolution on the joint text approved by the conciliation committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents (artificial optical radiation) (19th individual directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (PE-CONS 3668/3/2005 — C6-0001/2006 — 1992/0449B(COD))

(Codecision procedure: third reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3668/3/2005 — C6-0001/2006),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(1992)0560) [2],

- having regard to the amended proposal (COM(1994)0284) [3],

- having regard to its resolution of 16 September 1999 on current legislative procedures in the field of employment and social affairs (Commission communication to the European Parliament and the Council — Effects of the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty) (SEC(1999)0581 — C4-0219/1999) [4],

- having regard to its position at second reading [5] on the Council common position [6],

- having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position (COM(2005)0526) [7],

- having regard to Article 251(5) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 65 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee (A6-0026/2006),

1. Approves the joint text;

2. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

3. Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

4. Instructs its President to forward this legislative resolution to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 128, 9.5.1994, p. 146.

[2] OJ C 77, 18.3.1993, p. 12.

[3] OJ C 230, 19.8.1994, p. 3.

[4] OJ C 54, 25.2.2000, p. 75.

[5] Texts Adopted, 7.9.2005, P6_TA(2005)0329.

[6] OJ C 172 E, 12.7.2005, p. 26.

[7] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 13 - 00318 - CR BRANDI NICOLE WEST, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court Ochiltree County, Texas Trial Court No. 19,805, Honorable Earl McKinley, Presiding



### February 26 , 2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant, Brandi Nicole West , appealed a n order revoking community supervision for the offense of driving while intoxicated, and sent enc ing her to thirty days ’ incarceration in the Ochiltree County Jail , and $ 1,250 fine. We will dismiss. Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by November 14, 2013. When no brief was received by that date, this Court sent appellant notice that her brief was past due , and informing her that, if her brief was not filed by December 2, 2013, the appeal would be abated and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. See T EX . R. A PP . P.2

38.8(b)(2), (3). When no brief was received, this Court issued an opinion abating the appeal and remanding the cause to the trial court to determine, inter alia , whether appellant desired to pursue this appeal. See West v. State , No. 07 - 13 - 00318 - CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 53, at *1 - 2 (Tex. App. — Amarillo Jan. 6, 2014, no pet.) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). On remand, the trial court noticed appellant of hearing but appellant failed to appear. Based on information provid ed by appointed counsel, however, the trial court concluded that appellant no longer desires to prosecute this appeal. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were included in a supplemental clerk’s record filed with this Court on Januar y 31, 2014. Also included in this supplemental clerk’s record is the affidavit of appointed counsel attesting that appellant no longer desires to prosecute this appeal. On February 11, 2014, this Court received appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal. This motion, however, is signed only by appellant and not appellant’s counsel. While the motion does not meet the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) because it is not signed by appellant and counsel , we consider the signed affidavit of counsel to be sufficient to fulfill the purpose for Rule 42.2(a)’s requirement that the attorney sign a motion to dismiss appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2. As this Court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving appellant’s motion , the motion is he reby granted and the appeal is dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant = s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per C uriam Do not publish.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher
Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Colleen B. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 6, 2009



/s/ Colleen B. BrownColleen B. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer
II

Calendar No. 392

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1532

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 to deauthorize

the remainder of the project at East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

JUNE 1, 1998

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1996

to deauthorize the remainder of the project at East

Boothbay Harbor, Maine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1532 RS

1 SECTION 1. DEAUTHORIZATION OF REMAINDER OF

2 PROJECT AT EAST BOOTHBAY HARBOR,

3 MAINE.

4 Section 364 of the Water Resources Development Act

5 of 1996 (110 Stat. 3731) is amended by striking para6 graph (9) and inserting the following:

7 ‘‘(9) EAST BOOTHBAY HARBOR, MAINE.—The

8 project for navigation, East Boothbay Harbor,

9 Maine, authorized by the first section of the Act

10 entitled ‘‘An Act making appropriations for the con11 struction, repair, and preservation of certain public

12 works on rivers and harbors, and for other pur13 poses’’, approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 657).’’.

Calendar No. 392

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1532

A BILL

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of

at East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.1996 to deauthorize the remainder of the project

JUNE 1, 1998

Reported without amendment
## NUMBER 13 - 2 1 - 00 261 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JUSTIN ROY LAMMERS , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 2 nd 25 th District Court of Lavaca County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa Appellant attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for possession of controlled substance in penalty group one . We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Sentence in this matter was imposed with a judgment of conviction by jury entered on June 8, 2021

. On August 17 , 2021, a notice of appeal was filed . On August 18 , 2021 ,2 the C lerk of t he C ourt notified appellant that it appeared the appeal was not timely perfected. Appellant was advised the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court ’ s directive. Appellant did not respond, and the defect is uncured. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2(a)(1). Where a timely motion for new trial has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 26.2(a)(2). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.3. This Court's appellate j urisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the a ppeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out

- of

- time appeal by filing a post

- conviction writ of h abeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

.3 P ROC

. A NN . art. 11.07, § 3(a); see also Ex parte Garcia , 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

.
LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed on the 16th day of September, 2021.