alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of eTotalSource (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank J. Orlando,
      Chief Restructuring Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





April
      15,
      2008




/s/
              Frank J.
              OrlandoFrank J. Orlando
              Chief Restructuring Officer and
              Chief Financial
                Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
DECEMBER 29, 1995 FORM 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000822760
<NAME> ML ASSET BACKED CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1995
<CASH>                                            1000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0
<PP&E>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                           0
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1000
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                 0
<COMMISSIONS>                                        0
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-5002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES E. PRICE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CR-01-537-AMD) Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 15, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Denise C. Barrett, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Michael J. Leotta, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles E. Price pled guilty to bank robbery and received a fifty-five month sentence. In his plea agreement, he waived the right to appeal his sentence. His attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal but addressing alleged violation of Price’s right to a speedy trial. Price filed a pro se supplemental brief further arguing the speedy trial issue. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. Price contends that pretrial delays violated his rights under the Speedy Trial Act. However, excluding the time during which pretrial motions were pending, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(F), (J) (2000); United States v. Parker , 30 F.3d 542, 546-48 (4th Cir. 1994), Price pled guilty well within the time constraints of the Act. We have examined the entire record in this case in accordance with the requirements of Andersand find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny Price’s motion to appoint counsel. This court requires that counsel inform the client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. Thus, we deny counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw at this time. If Price requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may renew the motion to withdraw3 from representation. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                     70,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,537
<PP&E>                                          16,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,556,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,154,054
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,764,647)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,572
<SALES>                                        370,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               370,338
<CGS>                                          156,075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  981,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             226,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,034,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,037,608)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,037,608)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grand Forks, North Dakota
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Grand Forks, North Dakota People & Locations







Deborah Kay Raasakka
                        Grand Forks, North Dakota

                        




                        
                        Non-Federal Affiliate
                        Phone: (701) 795-8432
                        
                        
                        Fax: (701) 795-8230(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 10.43

                                    AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                                 DSI TOYS, INC.
                             1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN

Effective as of May 24, 1999 the DSI Toys, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan is
amended in the following respects:

Section 3.1 of Article III of the DSI Toys, Inc. Stock Option Plan is hereby
amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

            3.1 SHARES RESERVED UNDER PLAN. The aggregate number of shares of
      Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of Options granted under
      the Plan shall not exceed Nine Hundred Thousand (900,000) shares, all or
      any part of which may be issued pursuant to Incentive Stock Options,
      Nonstatutory Stock Options or any combination thereof. Shares of Common
      Stock issued upon the exercise of Options granted under the Plan may
      consist of either authorized but unissued shares or shares that have been
      issued and which shall have been or shall be reacquired by the Company.
      The total number of shares authorized under the Plan shall be subject to
      increase or decrease in order to give effect to the provisions of Sections
      10.3 and 10.4, and to give effect to any amendment adopted pursuant to
      Article IX. If any Option granted under the Plan shall expire, terminate
      or be canceled for any reason without having been exercised in full, the
      number of shares as to which such Option was not exercised shall again be
      available for purposes of the Plan. The Company shall at all times while
      the Plan is in effect reserve such number shares of Common Stock as will
      be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.

The undersigned Secretary of the Corporation hereby certifies that the foregoing
amendment to the DSI Toys, Inc. Stock Option Plan was duly adopted and approved
by proper action of the Board of Directors on April 9, 1999 and by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock of
the corporation on May 24, 1999.

                                          /s/ THOMAS V. YARNELL
                                          Thomas V. Yarnell
                                          Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains  summary  financial  information for the year ended
     September 30, 1997  extracted from the  registrant's  annual report on Form
     10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000822418
<NAME>                        Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,367,658
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,234,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                   20,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,670,228
<PP&E>                                         3,996,153
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,326,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,406,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          822,627
<BONDS>                                        12,794
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    104
<COMMON>                                       1,939
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,569,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,406,982
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,544,693
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,937,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,868,880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (53,412)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                791,353
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            791,353
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   791,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.10
        

</TABLE>
I)ISNIISS; Opinion filed September 20, 

### 2012

In The 

## Qtntrt ufApprih jI! Iitrirt rif Iixwi at 

## at1a No. 05-12-00384-CV ROBERT E. IIUTCIIISON, Appellant V. BRUSNIAK BLACKWFLL, P.C., Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-1l-01372 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges. Francis, and Lang Opinion By Justice Francis Beibre the Court is appellant’s motionto dismiss the appeal. Appellant asks that 

### the Court dismiss the appeal and assess all costs against him. We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEx. R. App. 

### P. 42.l(a)(1).

MOLLY F 1 JUSTICE 120384F.P05

## Juiirt tif

## I\p.ica1 Fift1! 

## Diitrfrt uf rxwi at Ja11a JUDGMENT ROBERT E. FIUTCHISON. Appellant No. 05-12-00384-CV V. BRUSNIAK B[ACKVvLI I PC Appellee Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court ofDallas County. Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DC-I I01372). Opinion deliveredby Justice Francis. Justices Bridges and Lang, participating. Based on the Courfs opinion ofthis date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Itis ORDERED thatappellee. BrusniakBlackwell. P.C

.. recoveritscosts oftheappeal from appellant. Robert F. Huichison. Judgment entered September 20. 2012.

JUSTICE
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 4, 2020

No. 04-20-00069-CV

IN RE Devry Marie SAENZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On January 31, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for 

temporary relief asking this court to vacate or stay the trial court’s order of commitment or set a 

bond on such commitment in a reasonable amount. On January 31, 2020, this court granted the 

motion for temporary relief and ordered relator released from confinement on a cash bond pending 

final resolution of relator’s petition. The real party in interest filed a response to the petition for 

writ of mandamus. After considering the petition, the response, and the record, this court 

concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus, revoke relator’s bond, and order her remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Kendall 

County.

It is so ORDERED on March 4, 2020.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of March, 2020.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 17-538, styled In the Marriage of Devry Marie Saenz and Matthew Joseph 

Springer, and In the Interest of L.V.S., P.M.S., and P.M.S., Children, pending in the 451st Judicial District Court, 

Kendall County, Texas, the Honorable Solomon Casseb, III presiding.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 7, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00424

- CV

IN RE RPH CAPITAL PA RTNERS , LP

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D . Chapa, Justice

On January 12, 2017

, Real Parties in Interest timely filed a motion for rehearing. The

court requests that Relator file a response. If Relator choose s to file a response, Relator must file

the response, or a motio n for extension of time to file a response, within TEN DAYS of the date

of this order.

It is so ORDERED on March 7, 2017

.

____________________________ _____ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of March, 2017

.

______________________________ _____ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016

- CI

- 052 51, styled Peridot Joint Venture, Millennium Exploration

Company, LLC, and Richard Monroy v. RPH Capital Partners, LP , pending in the 57th Judicial District Court,

Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
#### Michael H. Roth, Respondent, v Jay Turoff, Appellant.

Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Carro, Asch and Rosenberger, JJ. *[See,*127 Misc 2d 998.]
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1634 Referral Instructions Senate (RIS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1634

                   To guarantee honesty in budgeting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 1998

 Mr. Faircloth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
 referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, as modified 
   by the order of April 11, 1986, to the Committees on Budget, and 
Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one committee reports, 
    the other committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   To guarantee honesty in budgeting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honest Balanced Budget Act of 
1998''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The social security system runs an annual surplus that 
        is invested in Government bonds. The Treasury thus borrows the 
        surplus, which is projected to approach $100,000,000,000 in 
        1999, and spends these monies on programs unrelated to social 
        security.
            (2) In fact, when the projected annual social security 
        trust fund surplus is removed from the baseline calculations 
        through 2003, a cumulative 5-year deficit of about 
        $518,000,000,000 is added to the national debt.
            (3) The Congressional Budget Office projects that the 
        annual deficit will range from $136,000,000,000 to 
        $190,000,000,000 over the 5-year budget cycle and, further, the 
        fictional social security trust fund balance will rise from 
        $730,000,000,000 to $1,380,000,000,000 during this period.

SEC. 3. SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND PROTECTION.

    The receipts and disbursements of the social security trust funds 
included in the gross Federal debt shall not be--
            (1) included in the Federal budget baseline for any fiscal 
        year; and
            (2) counted as new budget authority, outlays, receipts, or 
        deficit or surplus for purposes of--
                    (A) offsetting any tax decrease; and
                    (B) offsetting any spending increase.
                                 <all>
```