alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul Katzeff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2008
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ Paul Katzeff                     
|                   |  | Paul Katzeff, Chief Executive Officer
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 23, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00271-CR

CARLA NICOLE POTTS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 14

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1819033

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A written request to withdraw the notice of appeal, personally signed by 

appellant, has been filed with this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this 

court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s request.

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the clerk of the court 

to issue the mandate of the court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and McCally.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR homepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research People





- NCAUR Home Page
- MPM Home Page
- Personnel Listing

Stephanie N Folmar    Biological Science Laboratory Technician (Microbiology) /ARSUserFiles/10462/Stephanie.jpg
 Phone: (309) 681-6038Fax: (309) 681-6672Room 1133USDA ARS NCAUR1815 N University St.Peoria IL 61604
 Stephanie Folmar is a technician working with Dr. Susan McCormick.  She is a Central Illinois native and received her Bachelor of Science degrees in Biology and Chemistry from Eureka College.  Stephanie started working at NCAUR in 1997.   PublicationsNo publications listed for this employee.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                                            
|Cornelis F. Wit                                                
|President, Chief Executive Office (principal executive officer)

May 14, 2009
#### Harold Alexander, Appellant, v New York Central Mutual, Respondent.

[949 NYS2d 305]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David Michael Barry, J.), entered March 25, 2011. The judgment granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the provision dismissing the complaint and granting judgment in favor of defendant as follows:

It is adjudged and declared that defendant is not obligated to indemnify plaintiff for any property theft losses arising from the burglary of plaintiffs residence on December 19, 2008, and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking a judgment declaring, inter alia, that defendant is obligated to indemnify plaintiff for the property theft losses resulting from the burglary of his home. Supreme Court properly resolved the merits of the action in favor of defendant, but erred to the extent that it granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint rather than declaring the rights of the parties *(see Maurizzio v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.,*73 NY2d 951, 954 [1989]), and we therefore modify the judgment accordingly. “When an insurer gives its insured written notice of its desire that proof of loss under a policy of . . . insurance be furnished and provides a suitable form for such proof, failure of the insured to file proof of loss within 60 days after receipt of such notice, or within any longer period specified in the notice, is an absolute defense to an action on the policy, absent waiver of the requirement by the insurer or conduct on its part estopping its assertion of the defense” *(Igbara Realty Corp. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*63 NY2d 201, 209-210 [1984]; *see*Insurance Law § 3407 [a]; *Aryeh v Westchester Fire Ins. Co.,*138 AD2d 337, 338 [1988], *lv denied*73 NY2d 703 [1989]). It is undisputed that defendant demanded that plaintiff submit a sworn proof of loss and provided the necessary form, and that plaintiff failed to comply with the demand. Defendant therefore has an absolute defense to the action on the policy *(see Anthony Marino Constr. Corp. v INA Underwriters Ins. Co.,*69 NY2d 798, 800 [1987]; *Stopani v Allegany Co-op Ins. Co.,*83 AD3d 1446, 1447 [2011]; *Bailey v Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co.,*273 AD2d 691, 692 [2000]).

Contrary to plaintiffs contention, his unsworn statement of *1458loss and receipts for the stolen items were not sufficient to comply with the demand (see *Maleh v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*64 NY2d 613, 614 [1984]; *Darvick v General Acc. Ins. Co.,*303 AD2d 540 [2003]; *Aryeh,*138 AD2d at 338). The policy required that plaintiff provide defendant, “within 60 days after [its] request, your signed, sworn proof of loss,” and thus the “unsworn statement[ ] of loss do[es] not satisfy the contractual or statutory requirement to serve defendant ] with sworn proofs of loss” *(Bailey,*273 AD2d at 693). Present — Scudder, *P.J.,*Centra, Peradotto, Carni and Lindley, JJ.
#### Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Global Strat Inc. et al., Defendants, and Ezequiel Nasser et al., Appellants-Respondents. (And Another Action.)

[942 NYS2d 55]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered August 9, 2010, awarding plaintiffs the total sum of $99,013,769 as against the Nasser defendants, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order, same court and J.H.O., *492entered January 31, 2011, which granted so much of defendants’ motion as sought to dismiss the eighth cause of action and to dismiss the complaint in its entirety as against Albert Nasser for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion as to Albert Nasser, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed, without costs, as academic.

In granting the motion to dismiss as against Albert Nasser for lack of personal jurisdiction, Supreme Court stated that it was vacating the judgment as against him. However, the judgment in the record on appeal names Albert Nasser as a defendant from whom plaintiffs have recovery, and it is that judgment that we affirm. We find that plaintiffs made a prima facie showing that Albert is subject to jurisdiction in New York through evidence that in the first three months of 2008, he actively traded in the New York-based Merrill Lynch accounts of Inversiones, his personal holding company, and that he participated by telephone in a March 2008 meeting with Merrill Lynch in New York concerning the trading activities at issue in this case *(see Kreutter v McFadden Oil Corp.,*71 NY2d 460, 467 [1988]; *compare OneBeacon Am. Ins. Co. v Newmont Min. Corp.,*82 AD3d 554, 555 [2011] [no evidence that defendant exercised control over the corporation that purchased insurance policies issued by insurers with principal places of business in New York]).

The Nassers’ repeated failure to comply with discovery deadlines or offer a reasonable excuse for their noncompliance with discovery requests, as well as their counsel’s misrepresentations in open court as to the cause of one of their violations, give rise to an inference of willful and contumacious conduct warranting the entry of judgment against them *(see Turk Eximbank-Export Credit Bank of Turkey v Bicakcioglu,*81 AD3d 494 [2011]). The Nassers were appropriately warned that judgment would be entered against them if their discovery responses were found by the Special Referee to be noncompliant with plaintiffs’ requests *(see id.; cf. Corner Realty 30/7 v Bernstein Mgt. Corp.,*249 AD2d 191, 194 [1998]). Concur— Tom, J.E, Andrias, Catterson, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
Case: 1:04-cv-01939 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/04 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:11
Case: 1:04-cv-01939 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/04 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:12
Case: 1:04-cv-01939 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/04 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:13
Case: 1:04-cv-01939 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/04 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:14
Case: 1:04-cv-01939 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/04 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:15
Case: 1:04-cv-01939 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/04 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:16
Case: 1:04-cv-01939 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/04 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:17
EXHIBIT
      23.1








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






Our
      report on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Manhattan
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and
      for
      the years then ended and on the consolidated statements of operations, changes
      in stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the period from August
      6, 2001 (date of inception) to December 31, 2005, included in this Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, is dated March 3, 2006.
      We
      consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, which includes an
      explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s ability
      to
      continue as a going concern, in the following registration
      statements previously filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933: the registration statements
      on Forms S-3 with SEC File Nos. 333-34379, 333-35079, 333-65393, 333-40916
      and
      333-49036, and the registration statements on Forms S-8 with SEC file Nos.
      333-15807, 333-112888, 333-112889 and 333-48531.








/s/  J.H.
      Cohn LLP





Roseland,
      New Jersey


March
      27, 2006
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3635

_____________________________
L EO H OLLINGSWORTH , Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Charles W. Dodson , Judge

. June 25, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OBERTS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Leo Hollingsworth, pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Brett Michael Roy Coleman, Assistant Attorney General, and Kenne th S. Steely
, General Counsel
, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 STATE OFINCORPORATION/SUBSIDIARY
    
    ORGANIZATIONADM/CHS, LLC
    
    DelawareAg States Agency, LLC
    
    MinnesotaAg States Agency of Montana Inc, a subsidiary of Ag States Agency LLC
    
    MontanaAgronomy Company of Canada, Ltd.
    
    Nova ScotiaAllied Agronomy, LLC
    
    North DakotaBattle Creek/CHS, LLC
    
    DelawareCenex Ag, Inc.
    
    DelawareCHS Energy Canada, Inc.
    
    AlbertaCenex Petroleum, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaCenex Pipeline, LLC
    
    MinnesotaCentral Montana Propane, LLC
    
    MontanaCHS do Brasil Ltda.
    
    BrazilCHS-Browns Valley
    
    MinnesotaCHS-Chinook
    
    MontanaCHS-Clinton/Wilmot
    
    MinnesotaCHS-Connell, Inc.
    
    WashingtonCHS-Dickinson
    
    North DakotaCHS-Drayton
    
    North DakotaCHS-Garrison
    
    North DakotaCHS-Grangeville, Inc.
    
    IdahoCHS-Hoffman
    
    MinnesotaCHS-Kindred
    
    North DakotaCHS-Lewistown
    
    MontanaCHS-Mitchell
    
    South DakotaCHS-Moscow
    
    IdahoCHS-Starbuck
    
    MinnesotaCHS-Wallace
    
    KansasCircle Land Management, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaClassic Farms, LLC
    
    South DakotaCofina Financial, LLC
    
    MinnesotaCountry Hedging, Inc.
    
    DelawareDakota Agronomy Partners, LLC
    
    North DakotaEnergy Partners, LLC
    
    MontanaFin-Ag, Inc.
    
    South DakotaFront Range Pipeline, LLC
    
    MinnesotaFull Circle, LTD
    
    MinnesotaGenetic Marketing Group, LLC
    
    WashingtonGreen Bay Terminal Corporation
    
    WisconsinHarvest States Cooperatives Europe B.V.
    
    NetherlandsHorizon Milling, LLC
    
    DelawareKropf/CHS, LLC
    
    OregonMontevideo Grain, LLC
    
    DelawareMountain View of Montana, LLC
    
    DelawareNational Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA)
    
    KansasClear Creek Transportation, LLC, a subsidiary of NCRA
    
    KansasJayhawk Pipeline, LLC, a subsidiary of NCRA
    
    KansasKaw Pipeline, a subsidiary of NCRA
    
    DelawareMcPherson Agricultural Products, LLC, a subsidiary of NCRA
    
    KansasOsage Pipeline Co, a subsidiary of NCRA
    
    DelawareNorick Risk Funding Concepts, LLC
    
    MinnesotaPGG/HSC Feed Company, LLC
    
    OregonPrairie Lakes Grain Storage
    
    MinnesotaRed Rock Cooperative Association
    
    South DakotaSafety Resource Alliance, LLC
    
    KansasSparta Foods, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaSt. Paul Maritime Corporation
    
    MinnesotaTEMCO, LLC
    
    DelawareTillamook/GTA Feeds, LLC
    
    OregonUnited Country Brands, LLC
    
    DelawareAgriliance, LLC, a subsidiary of United Country Brands, LLC
    
    DelawareUnited Energy, LLC
    
    DelawareUnited Harvest, LLC
    
    DelawareUnited Processors, LLC
    
    DelawareRocky Mountain Milling, LLC, a subsidiary of United Processors, LLC
    
    DelawareVentura Foods, LLC
    
    DelawareWestern Prairie Nutrition, LLC
    
    MinnesotaWhitman Terminal Association, LLC
    
    Delaware
# EUR-Lex - 52006AP0432 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52006AP0432

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of a programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007) (6233/2/2006 - C6-0271/2006 - 2004/0151(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 313 E , 20/12/2006 P. 0087 - 0000 *

P6_TA(2006)0432

Programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007) ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of a programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007) (6233/2/2006 — C6-0271/2006 — 2004/0151(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (6233/2/2006 — C6-0271/2006),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2004)0470) [2],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Culture and Education (A6-0337/2006),

1. Approves the common position;

2. Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;

3. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

4. Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Texts Adopted, 25.10.2005, P6_TA(2005)0398.

[2] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.1

[Fisher Letterhead]



|      |  |                               
|----- |  | ------------------------------
|DATE: |  | February 27, 2009             
|      | 
|TO:   |  | Compensation Committee Members
|      | 
|FROM: |  | Colleen B. Brown              
|      | 
|RE:   |  | Voluntary Salary Reduction    

Consistent with my communication to the Board in early December and to the shareholders in late December, this
letter will serve as formal notification to the Committee of my decision to take a voluntary 10% reduction in base salary for the 2009 compensation period.

This is in response to the worsening economic conditions the country is experiencing and its resulting impact on advertising.

I am also very
pleased to inform you that Rob Dunlop is joining me in this effort by volunteering to reduce his salary by 10% for 2009. In addition, there are 25 other officers, managers, and employees who have joined together in an effort to help reduce expenses
in 2009 and have taken similar voluntary reductions.

I am personally touched by the number of dedicated people that have chosen voluntarily to reduce
their salaries or have foregone merit increases contractually due them, in an effort to do their part in helping Fisher through a very economically challenging environment. I think it speaks volumes to the spirit of this organization and the loyalty
and commitment these individuals have demonstrated to seeing our mission through.

We have taken significant steps to control operating expenses and are
pursuing additional ways to drive revenue and opportunity while reducing costs. We are faced with limited visibility for the year and anticipate extensive continued pressure on our business for the near term.

Please let me know if you have any questions.
Case: 1:04-cv-02617 Document #: 312-2 Filed: 02/17/09 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3284