alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VALERIE MCCLURE, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CAROLYN COL VIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

3:14-CV-00973-KI 

ORDER 

Based upon the stipulation of the pmiies, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $2, 736.86 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412. The patiies agree that attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiffs attorney, dependent 

upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiffs attorney and 

mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Pottland, 

OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plainjiffs attorney's office at the address stated above. 

DATED this ___s2_ ;/(Ii day of x}t~fv v , 2015. 

D 

arr King 

U.S. District Court Judge 

Case 3:14-cv-00973-KI Document 24 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southern Horticultural Research Unit: Poplarville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Employee and Collaborator Spotlights
                        Dr. Hamidou Sakhanoko
                                    Recent Employee Arrivals and Departures!
                                    Mississippi State University Coastal Research and Extension Center
                                    University of Tennessee, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology
                                    Tennessee State University Otis Floyd Nursery Research Center
                    Quick Links
                        Small Fruit and Ornamental Genetics Group
                                    Production Management Research Group
                                    Plant Releases
                                    Administrative TeamSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Poplarville, Mississippi Southern Horticultural Research Unit People







Willie R Swain    Tractor Operator /ARSUserFiles/60620500/Willie.jpg Willie Swainisa Tractor Operatorwith major duties inResearchPlotMaintenanceat TCSHL. He has been with USDA ARS for 21 years.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joan Katzeff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Joan Katzeff       
|                        |  | Joan Katzeff, President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

EARL DEAN ALLEN, 

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:14-cv-01206-MC 

V. OPINION AND ORDER 

T MOBILE, ATT, andVerizon, 

Defendants. 

MCSHANE, Judge: 

Plaintiff, prose, filed a complaint against T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon'on July 28, 

2014. Pl.'s Compl. 1-5, ECF No. 1. On August 1, 2014, this Court issued an opinion dismissing 

plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim. Order 1-3, ECF No. 6. In consideration of 

plaintiffs pro se status, this Court granted plaintiff until September 2, 2014 "to file an amended 

complaint c~ring the deficiencies identified." ld. at 3. 1 Plaintiffh~s not taken additional action 

since that time. Accordingly, because plaintiff failed to comply with this Court's order, ECF No. 

6, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 5th day of September, 2014. 

l_·· 

Michael J. McShane 

United States District Judg~ 

1 The copy of this order (ECF No.6) sent to plaintiff was returned as "not deliverable as addressed." Mail Returned, 

ECF No. 8; see also Local Rule 83-10 ("[E]very unrepresented party[] has a continuing responsibility to notify the 

Clerk's Office whenever his or her mailing address, telephone number, and/or business e-mail address changes.''), 

1 - OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 6:14-cv-01206-MC Document 9 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luminex Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harriss T. Currie, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Harriss T. Currie


Harriss T. Currie


Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance


July 31, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001034594
<NAME> BAY BANKS OF VIRGINIA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,927,471
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     156,112,100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,803,163
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 52,432,641
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      54,725,705
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        52,432,641
<LOANS>                                    144,471,130
<ALLOWANCE>                                (1,256,329)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             215,282,639
<DEPOSITS>                                 177,333,270
<SHORT-TERM>                                17,418,691
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,106,390
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,792,808
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,468,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             215,605,948
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,881,783
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,592,353
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                35,815
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,509,951
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,630,824
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,835,238
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,674,713
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  130,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (4,400)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,149,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,194,061
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,194,061
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   860,061
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.02
<LOANS-NON>                                     36,551
<LOANS-PAST>                                   750,117
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,197,843
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   74,010
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,496
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,256,329
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,256,329
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
----

----

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a){15(d)}                  of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Registrant. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                  January 13, 2006 | /s/                  PETER                  KEEFE                                                         |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     | Peter                  Keefe                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                                     | President,                  Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

----
#### Kyle P. TATE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lynn T. CARVEL, M.D.; Desoto Diagnostic Imaging, L.L.C., d/b/a Carvel Imaging; Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare and Memphis Radiological Professional Corporation, Joint Ventures, Defendants-Appellees. Lynn T. Carvel, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kyle P. Tate, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-60150

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 9, 2011.

Kyle P. Tate, Tate Firm, P.L.L.C., Keystone Heights, FL, pro se.

Wiley Johnson Barbour, Jr., Esq., Henry, Barbour, Decell & Bridgforth, Limited, Yazoo City, MS, John T. Lamar, Jr., Esq., Lamar *&*Hannaford, P.A., Senatobia, MS, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kyle P. Tate appeals from a district court judgment confirming an arbitration award. He argues that the judgment must be vacated because of a defect in service. However, Tate has waived this issue by not raising it in the district court, and we therefore AFFIRM.

Tate worked with his sister, Appellee Lynn Carvel. After losing his job, Tate filed a lawsuit seeking damages for breach contract and for retaliatory termination. Carvel filed a motion to compel arbitration. The district court granted Carvel’s motion, and the parties proceeded to arbitration under the American Arbitration Association.

The arbitration panel dismissed all of Tate’s claims and awarded Carvel the expenses incurred in compelling arbitration. Then, Carvel returned to the district court where Tate had first filed his lawsuit and filed a motion to enter judgment on the arbitration award. Carvel served Tate directly via paper and electronic mail, as well as through Tate’s attorneys of record. Despite this notification, Tate filed no response, and the district court entered judgment on the arbitration award.

A party who fails to timely object to a court’s personal jurisdiction waives the defense. *Ins. Corp. of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee,*456 U.S. 694, 704, 102 S.Ct. 2099, 72 L.Ed.2d 492 (1982). This is not a case where Tate was *35simply unaware of the district court proceedings. To the contrary, Tate received Carvel’s motion — on multiple occasions— and chose to make no objection to the form of service. He may not make that objection now on appeal. Moreover, to the extent Tate objects to a lack of jurisdiction, the district court retained jurisdiction to enter judgment on the arbitration award from Tate’s original lawsuit. *See T & R Enter., Inc. v. Cont’l Grain Co.,*613 F.2d 1272, 1279 (5th Cir.1980).

For the forgoing reasons, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

THURMAN HOLDER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE, KEVIN KIMBALL, and 

VICKERY VILES, 

Defendants. 

JUDGMENT 

Civil No.6:14-cv-01704-AA 

Pursuant to the 0 PINION AND ORD ER signed on April 29, 2016, this action is dismissed 

and remanded to state court for further action pursuant to that OPINION AN D ORDER. 

Dated this 29th day of April 2016. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

JUDGMENT 

Case 6:14-cv-01704-AA Document 34 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-5769

_____________________________

ANTHONY WILLIAM LORD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

___________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

W. Joel Boles, Judge.

May 11, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research: Fort Pierce, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Links
                        USDA Main Page
                                    ARS Main PageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research People







WILBUR WIDMERheadline bar Wilbur Widmer,Ph.DResearch Chemist U. S. Horticultural Research Laboratory2001 South Rock RoadFort Pierce, FL 34945Telephone: (772) 462-5935Fax: (772) 462-5986Email:Wilbur.Widmer@ars.usda.gov   **Current Research Projects:** Dr. Widmer's program focuses on the process of converting citrus waste to ethanol so that it can be economically feasible.In this process, limonene, a high value co-product, can be recovered from citrus peel, lowering the production costs. Dr. Widmer served on a study team that identified and established the substance in grapefruit juice that causes potentially dangerous interactions with specific medicines.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Kenneth Dewayne Nelson, Appellant

No. 06-18-00133-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17F-1100-005). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the judgment in this case to provide that this sentence 

will run concurrently, not cumulatively, with the sentences in the four companion cases, and we 

strike imposition of court costs in this case. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is 

affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Kenneth Dewayne Nelson, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 17, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk