alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


<PAGE>



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Classic Bancshares, Inc.
Ashland, Kentucky

We hereby consent to incorporation  by reference in the Registration  Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos.  333-09385,  and 333-09409 and  333-43481) of our report dated
May 29,  1998,  relating to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of Classic
Bancshares,  Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1998, which report appears in
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Classic Bancshares, Inc. for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 1998.





                                       /s/ SMITH, GOOLSBY, ARTIS & REAMS, P.S.C.


June 22, 1998
Ashland, Kentucky
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

I, Michael A. Martino,President and Chief Executive Officer of Sonus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 
| (1)    |   | the Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended  September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    |   | the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                        |

 
| Dated: |                                   | May 9, 2008 |
|--------|----------------------------------------|------------------|
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/ Michael A. Martino                 |
|   | Michael A. Martino                     |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|        |                                        |                  |  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1640 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1640

 To designate the building of the United States Postal Service located 
at 180 East Kellogg Boulevard in Saint Paul, Minnesota, as the ``Eugene 
                  J. McCarthy Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 1998

  Mr. Wellstone (for himself and Mr. Grams) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the building of the United States Postal Service located 
at 180 East Kellogg Boulevard in Saint Paul, Minnesota, as the ``Eugene 
                  J. McCarthy Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    (a) In General.--The building of the United States Postal Service 
located at 180 East Kellogg Boulevard in Saint Paul, Minnesota, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Eugene J. McCarthy Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Eugene J. 
McCarthy Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60738

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARSHUN D. STEWART,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:09-CR-157-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marshun D. Stewart appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a

new trial. His brief contains no citations to the record in support of either his

statement of the facts or his legal argument. Pursuant to FED. R. APP. P.

28(a)(7) & (9), the appellant’s brief must include “a statement of facts relevant

to the issues submitted for review with appropriate references to the record” and

an argument section that contains the “appellant’s contentions and the reasons

for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 10, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60738 Document: 00511816542 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/10/2012
No. 10-60738

appellant relies.” Because Stewart has not provided any record support for his

contentions that the district court erred in denying his motion for a new trial, he

has abandoned this issue by failing to adequately brief it. See United States v.

Cothran, 302 F.3d 279, 286 n.7 (5th Cir. 2002); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222,

224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813

F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Even if counsel’s unsupported arguments were considered, no abuse of

discretion by the district court has been shown. See United States v. Piazza, 647

F.3d 559, 565 (5th Cir. 2011).

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-60738 Document: 00511816542 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/10/2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the                           ( print page 46885)                        United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on certain magnesia carbon bricks from China and the antidumping duty orders on certain magnesia carbon bricks from China and Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on January 4, 2021 (86 FR 126) and determined on April 9, 2021 that it would conduct expedited reviews (86 FR 36770, July 13, 2021).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on August 17, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5223 (August 2021), entitled                     *Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China and Mexico: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-468 and 731-TA-1166-1167 (Second Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: August 17, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-17886 Filed 8-19-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
1 – ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

KEVIN M. KEAY,

Plaintiff, No. 3:14-cv-01355-SU

v. ORDER

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. 

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings & Recommendation [34] on June 16, 

2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment 

[24]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and 

Recommendation, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. 

Case 3:14-cv-01355-SU Document 38 Filed 08/11/15 Page 1 of 2
2 – ORDER 

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 

840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate 

Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de 

novo, I find no error. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan’s Findings & Recommendation [34].

Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [24] is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of , 2015.

 

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01355-SU Document 38 Filed 08/11/15 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         September 14, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Soheyla Saadi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5178,                         *saadisoh@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 17, 2021. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-17988 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 11, 2012 

p0508 

Order 

 

May 11, 2012 

144957-8 

IN RE BRUNO, MINORS. 

 SC: 144957-8 

 COA: 305539; 305540 

 Macomb CC Family Div: 

 2008-000786-NA, 2008-000787-NA, 

 2011-000010-NA, 2011-000011-NA 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1633 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1633

   To suspend through December 31, 1999, the duty on certain textile 
                               machinery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 1998

  Mr. Chafee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend through December 31, 1999, the duty on certain textile 
                               machinery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    (a) Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

``    9902.81.20        Other textile                                                                           
                         printing                                                                               
                         machinery                                                                              
                         (provided for                                                                          
                         in subheading                                                                          
                         8443.59.10)....  Free             No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                                                                                              31/99             
                                                                                                              ''

    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any 
other provision of law, upon proper request filed with the Customs 
Service within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of goods 
described in subheading 8443.59.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States--
            (1) which was made after December 31, 1997, and before the 
        date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this 
        Act, and
            (2) with respect to which there would have been no duty if 
        the amendment made by subsection (a) applied to such entry or 
        withdrawal,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment applied to 
such entry or withdrawal.
                                 <all>
```
#### AMOROSA, Appellant, v. GALLELLA, Respondent.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County,

Additional General Term.

December 16, 1895.)

Action by Dante Amorosa against Antonio Gallella.

Samuel S. Sewards, for appellant.

J. Palmeri, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment reversed; new trial ordered; costs to appellant to abide event.
#### WOODDY *v.*MILLEDGEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY.

May 13, 1915.

Injunction. Before Judge Park. Baldwin superior court. August. 21, 1914.

*D. S. Sanford*and *Riñes & Yinson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Allen <& Pottle,*contra.

Beck, J.

Under the evidence in the ease there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the court below in granting the interlocutory injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
<logo> Bank of Hawaii

Norwest Bank Minnesota N A
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention:	Tracey Waldman

RE:	Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1996 fiscal year:

(A)	I have reviewed the activities and performance of the 
Servicer during the preceding fiscal year under the terms of 
the Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and 
Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and to the 
best of these Officers' knowledge, the Servicer has 
fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities or obligations 
under these Agreements throughout such year, or if there has 
been a default or failure of the servicer to perform any of 
such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description 
of each default or failure and the nature and status thereof has 
been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA.;

B)	I have confirmed that the Servicer is currently an approved 
FNMA or FHLMC servicer in good standing;

(C)	I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and 
Omissions insurance Policy and any other bonds required 
under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement, 
Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide are in full 
force and effect;

(D)	All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood 
Insurance Policy (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage 
insurance Policy (if applicable), with respect to each 
Mortgaged Property, have been paid and that all such 
insurance policies are in full force and effect;

E)	All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any 
other expenses accrued and due, that if not paid could 
result in a lien or encumbrance on any Mortgaged Property, 
have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses have not 
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason 
for the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA.;

F)	All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly 
funded; and

(G)	All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of 
Mortgage Property required per section 6050J and 6050P of he 
Internal Revenue Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:
/s/GLEN H.W. CHONG
Officer
ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT
Title
MARCH 25, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1578 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1578

To make available on the Internet, for purposes of access and retrieval 
by the public, certain information available through the Congressional 
                       Research Service web site.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 1998

 Mr. McCain (for himself, Mr. Coats, Mr. Faircloth, and Mr. Ashcroft) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make available on the Internet, for purposes of access and retrieval 
by the public, certain information available through the Congressional 
                       Research Service web site.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN CRS WEB SITE INFORMATION.

    (a) Availability of Information.--
            (1) In general.--The Director of the Congressional Research 
        Service shall make available on the Internet, for purposes of 
        access and retrieval by the public, all information that--
                    (A) is available through the Congressional Research 
                Service web site;
                    (B) is described in paragraph (2); and
                    (C) is not confidential as determined by--
                            (i) the Director; or
                            (ii) the head of a Federal department or 
                        agency that provided the information to the 
                        Congressional Research Service.
            (2) Information.--The information referred to in paragraph 
        (1)(B) is as follows:
                    (A) All Congressional Research Service Issue 
                Briefs.
                    (B) All Congressional Research Service Reports that 
                are available to Members of Congress through the 
                Congressional Research Service web site.
                    (C) All Congressional Research Service 
                Authorization of Appropriations Products or 
                Appropriations Products.
    (b) Time.--The information shall be so made available not earlier 
than 30 days after the first day the information is available to 
Members of Congress through the Congressional Research Service web 
site.
    (c) Requirements.--The Director of the Congressional Research 
Service shall make the information available in a manner that the 
Director determines--
            (1) is practical and reasonable; and
            (2) does not permit the submission of comments from the 
        public.
                                 <all>
```