alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blue Rhino
Corporation (the Company) for the period ending October 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Billy D. Prim, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



| | /s/ Billy D. Prim
| | -----------------



| | Billy D. Prim
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
December 16, 2002
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 3:14-cr-00267-JO Document 284 Filed 11/14/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:14-cr-00267-JO Document 284 Filed 11/14/19 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

TODD SHELTON, 

 Plaintiff, 

3:14-CV-01561-SI

vs. 

ORDER

CAROLYN COLVIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $6297.94 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree that attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent 

upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff’s attorney and 

mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, 

OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. 

DATED this _____ day of ___________________, 2016. 

_______________________________ 

Michael Simon 

United States District Court Judge 

1st March

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Case 3:14-cv-01561-SI Document 25 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 1
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cotton Ginning Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Cotton Ginning Research People & Locations







Kirk J Zivkovich
                        Cotton Ginning Research

                        




                        
                        Maintenance Worker
                        Phone: (575) 526-6381
                        
                        
                        Fax: (575) 525-1076(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 21



                             TUSCARORA INCORPORATED


                              List of Subsidiaries



         The following is a complete list of the subsidiaries of the Company:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        Name of                                                         Jurisdiction of
                      Subsidiary                                                         Incorporation
                      ----------                                                         -------------
<S>                                                                                     <C>
Alpine Packaging, Inc. (1)                                                              Colorado

Tuscarora International, Inc. (1)                                                       Delaware

         Tuscarora, S.A. de C.V. (2)                                                    Mexico

         Tuscarora Tijuana, S.A. de C.V. (2)                                            Mexico

Tuscarora Investment Corporation (1)                                                    Delaware

Tuscarora Limited(1)                                                                    England
  Tuscarora (Scotland) Limited (3)                                                      England
  Arrowtip Mouldings Limited (3)                                                        England
         Arrowtip Limited (4)                                                           England
         Anglian Expanded Products Limited (4)                                          England
</TABLE>
-----------------
(1)  100% owned by Tuscarora Incorporated.

(2)  4,999 shares are owned by Tuscarora International, Inc. and 1 share is
     owned by Tuscarora Incorporated.

(3)  100% owned by Tuscarora Limited.

(4)  100% owned by Arrowtip Moldings Limited
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Michael Christopher Moore v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00786

- CR

Trial court case number: 1505997D

Trial court: 213th District Court of Tarr ant County

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel, John W. Stickels, filed a motion to withdraw

and an appellate brief concluding that the above

- referenced appeal is frivolous. See

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). On January 31, 2020, appella nt, Michael

Christopher Moore, acting pro se, filed a motion to ob tain copies of the clerk ’ s record and

the reporter ’ s record “ for use in preparing his pro se response to counsel ’ s brief. ”

Appellant also requested an extension of time in which to file his response to Stickels ’ s

A nder s brief.

T he Court g r ant s appellant’s motion requesting the record and order s the district

clerk, no later than 10 days from the date of this o rder , to provide a copy of the clerk’s

and reporter’s record s to the pro se appellant . The trial court clerk shall certify to this

Court, within 15 days of the date of this o rder , the date upon which delivery of the

record s to the appellant is made.

Finally, the Court grants appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a pro

se And ers response. A ppellant’s pro se response to his counsel’s Anders brief shall be

filed within 45 days of the date of this order

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_________ /s/ Russell Lloyd

____________ Acting individually

Date: February 6, 2020
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research: Lincoln, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lincoln, Nebraska Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research People & Locations







Patrick J Callahan
                        Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (402) 472-0845
                        
                        
                        Fax: (402) 472-4020(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of Gwen Bray, Appellant, v Spring Hill Community Ambulance Corps, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[946 NYS2d 895]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to annul a determination of the Spring Hill Community Ambulance Corps, Inc., dated November 18, 2010, expelling the petitioner from its membership, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Jamieson, J.), entered July 17, 2011, which denied the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Spring Hill Community Ambulance Corps, Inc., did not violate its bylaws when it expelled her from its membership *(see Matter of Graebe v Board of Directors of Richmond County Country Club,*274 AD2d 429 [2000]; *cf. Matter of Capossela v Wykagyl Country Club,*258 AD2d 522, 523 [1999]; *Matter of Paglia v Staten Is. Little League,*38 AD2d 575 [1971]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding. Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CLEMENTE MOISES PULIDOJAUREGUI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-50368

D.C. No. 3:07-cr-01091-MLH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Clemente Moises Pulido-Jauregui appeals from the 57-month sentence

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in

FILED

APR 15 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-50368

the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Pulido-Jauregui contends, among other things, that the district court erred by

applying a 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) because

his prior conviction for assault on a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111,

does not constitute a crime of violence. We are precluded from reaching the merits

of Pulido-Jauregui’s claims by the valid appeal waiver. See United States v.

Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623-24 (9th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. Jacobo

Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc).

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062

(9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it

delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b). See United States v.

Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to

delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

The government’s motion for judicial notice is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50859 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR J. BIEGANOWSKI, J.D., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. EP-98-CR-959-2

-------------------- August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Victor J. Bieganowski pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with conspiring to commit mail fraud. Bieganowski has appealed, arguing that the Government breached the plea bargain by refusing to move for a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. Because the Government retained sole discretion, its refusal to move for a downward departure is reviewable for an unconstitutional motive only. See Wade v. United States , 504 U.S. 181, 185-86 (1992)

. Bieganowski does not contend that the Government's refusal to move for a downward departure was based upon anNo. 00-50859 -2- unconstitutional motive. Instead, Bieganowski argues that the record shows that the Government never intended to move for a downward departure and that its reasons for refusing to offer the motion were insubstantial. These issues are not reviewable. See United States v. Urbani , 967 F.2d 106, 110 (5th Cir. 1992). The judgment is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-109755, 333-103595, 333-80065, 333-06563,333-11451, 333-35651, 333-28929, 333-28927, 333-71913, 333-80963, 333-131144 and 333-11583) of our reports dated February 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Secure Computing Corporation, SecureComputing Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Secure Computing Corporation, included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

February 28, 2006 

 

62
#### In the Matter of the Commissioner of Social Services of the County of Erie, Fred Buscaglia, Appellant, v David C. Henry, Respondent.

—Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Family Court improperly directed petitioner to comply with respon*1006dent’s demand for a further bill of particulars since the demand sought evidentiary matters rather than particulars of petitioner’s claim *(see,*6 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac § 36:3, at 182; *Bassett v Bando Sangsa Co.,*94 AD2d 358, 359, *appeal dismissed*60 NY2d 962; *Medaris v Vosburgh,*93 AD2d 882; *Singer Warehouse & Trucking Corp. v Duskin,*87 AD2d 770, 771). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Notaro, J.—discovery.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Thomas J. Barnes, an Attorney, Respondent.

[945 NYS2d 920]

Order of suspension entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni and Sconiers, JJ. (Filed May 22, 2012.)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40016

Conference Calendar

 

JOHNNY ALLEN MCDOWELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARK SEACHRIST, Director, Bradshaw State Jail;

DIXON, Warden, Bradshaw State Jail,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:99-CV-406

--------------------

October 26, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny Allen McDowell, Texas prisoner # 756787, appeals the

summary judgment dismissal of his civil rights complaint. 

McDowell argues that his constitutional right to religious

freedom was violated when he was fed a meat product that

purported to be beef but which actually contained pork, which he

is forbidden to eat according to his religious beliefs as a

Muslim. After a de novo review of the record, we affirm. Based

on the summary judgment evidence, McDowell's claims, at best,
No. 01-40016

-2-

amount to claims of negligence. Negligence is not actionable

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327,

333-35 (1986); Eason v. Thaler, 14 73 F.3d 1322, 1327-28 n.2 (5th

Cir. 1996); George v. King, 837 F.2d 705, 707 (5th Cir. 1988).

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than August 31, 2021.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *The CAOS Family Irrevocable Trust, Bradley D. Simington, individually and as co-trustees with Teresa J. Simington, all of Milford, Iowa;*                     to form the CAOS Family Irrevocable Trust control group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Fostoria Bankshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Farm Savings Bank, both of Fostoria, Iowa.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 11, 2021.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-17501 Filed 8-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

JASON HILL,

Plaintiff,

v. 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Defendant.

 Case No. 3:13-CV-00745-KI

JUDGMENT

Sandy N. Webb

Law Offices of Sandy N. Webb, PC

0224 SW Hamilton St., Ste 202

Portland, OR 97239

Attorney for Plaintiff

Pilar C. French

Brian T. Kiolbasa

Lane Powell PC

Page 1 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:13-cv-00745-KI Document 17 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#: 79
601 SW Second Ave., Ste 2100

Portland, OR 97204

Attorneys for Defendant

KING, Judge:

Based on the record, this case is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 27 day of August, 2013. th

 /s/ Garr M. King 

Garr M. King

United States District Judge

Page 2 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:13-cv-00745-KI Document 17 Filed 08/27/13 Page 2 of 2 Page ID#: 80