alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1324

To deauthorize a portion of the project for navigation, Biloxi Harbor,

Mississippi.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 28, 1997

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To deauthorize a portion of the project for navigation, Biloxi

Harbor, Mississippi.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BILOXI HARBOR, MISSISSIPPI.

4 The portion of the project for navigation, Biloxi Har5 bor, Mississippi, authorized by the River and Harbor Act

6 of 1960 (74 Stat. 481), for the Bernard Bayou Channel

7 beginning near the Air Force Oil Terminal at approxi8 mately navigation mile 2.6 and extending downstream to

the North-South 1 9 ⁄2 of Section 30, Township 7 South,

10 Range 10 West, Harrison County, Mississippi, just west
2

•S 1324 IS

1 of Kremer Boat Yards, is not authorized after the date

2 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron J.
Copher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Ron J. Copher
Chief Financial Officer
July 29, 2004


                                      -25-
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit: Corvallis, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Corvallis, Oregon Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit People & Locations







Matthew James Donohue
                        Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Phone: 
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)
                            **Publications**
                                                (Clicking on the reprint icon
                                                    Reprint Icon
                                                    will take you to the publication reprint.)Limitations of the evidence base used to set recommended nutrient intakes for infants and lactating women.

- (Peer Reviewed Journal)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,779,517
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      65,874,818
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 33,515,501
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       3,503,926
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         3,429,466
<LOANS>                                     66,805,672
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,277,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,851,799
<DEPOSITS>                                 101,664,304
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,978,094
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,999,344
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,253,797
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,090,859
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,865,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             126,851,799
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,570,387
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,736,662
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                80,625
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,387,674
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,306,070
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,062,685
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,324,989
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  240,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,096,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,665,757
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,665,757
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,584,807
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.42
<LOANS-NON>                                    514,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,354,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,237,680
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  225,747
<RECOVERIES>                                    25,208
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,277,141
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,277,141
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1537
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 2 of 20 PageID #:1538
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 3 of 20 PageID #:1539
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 4 of 20 PageID #:1540
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 5 of 20 PageID #:1541
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 6 of 20 PageID #:1542
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 7 of 20 PageID #:1543
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 8 of 20 PageID #:1544
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 9 of 20 PageID #:1545
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 10 of 20 PageID #:1546
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 11 of 20 PageID #:1547
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 12 of 20 PageID #:1548
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 13 of 20 PageID #:1549
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 14 of 20 PageID #:1550
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 15 of 20 PageID #:1551
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 16 of 20 PageID #:1552
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 17 of 20 PageID #:1553
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 18 of 20 PageID #:1554
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 19 of 20 PageID #:1555
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 95-2 Filed: 02/04/08 Page 20 of 20 PageID #:1556
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

DENISE SUZANNE MORTSON Case No.: 1:14−cv−00915−AC

Plaintiff(s),

v. ORDER CONDITIONALLY

APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL

FOR ALL PURPOSES COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION

Defendant(s).

/

The Court hereby grants Plaintiff Denise Suzanne Mortson's Motion to Appoint Counsel [8] and

conditionally appoints Jesse L. London as counsel of record for all purposes.

Within 14 days of the date of this Order, the appointed attorney/law firm must file the Pro Bono

Appointment Response Form with the Court with the appropriate option checked.

If representation is denied due to a conflict of interest or other specified reason, the appointment

will be terminated and the Court may appoint substitute counsel.

For more information regarding pro bono forms, procedures, reimbursement of costs, or obtaining a

pro bono civil rights mentor attorney, please refer to the Pro Bono Program Procedures document

located on the Court's website or contact the Pro Bono Panel Administrator.

DATED this 2nd day of July, 2014 /s/John V. Acosta

Honorable John V. Acosta

U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge

Case 1:14-cv-00915-AC Document 12 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 2 Page ID#: 24
Denise Suzanne Mortson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

DENISE SUZANNE MORTSON Case No.: 1:14−cv−00915−AC

Plaintiff(s),

v. PRO BONO APPOINTMENT

RESPONSE FORM

COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION

Defendant(s).

/

In response to the Court's Order Appointing Pro Bono Counsel, I hereby certify that:

Representation of Denise Suzanne Mortson for all purposes is accepted. If appropriate, a

Substitution of Counsel will be filed to designate the responsible attorney continuing as counsel of

record.

Termination of this appointment is requested based on the following conflict of interest:

No conflict of interest exists. However, termination of this appointment is requested for the

following reason(s):

DATED this day of .

Signature

Printed Name and Oregon State Bar No.

Case 1:14-cv-00915-AC Document 12 Filed 07/02/14 Page 2 of 2 Page ID#: 25
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report of CHS Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K/A-3 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Schmitz,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ John Schmitz
------------------
John Schmitz
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
January 30, 2004
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-171652, 333-155199, 333-151968 and 333-147278) of our report dated March 31, 2010 with respect to our audit of the financial statementsof ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. as of December 31, 2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the period from February 25, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2009, which report is included in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Stonefield Josephson, Inc.

Los Angeles, California 

March 31,2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997             APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997             JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          33,557                  97,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  402,616                 440,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               436,173                 537,382
<PP&E>                                         701,383                 701,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,828                  43,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,928,438              23,013,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          234,771                 253,486
<BONDS>                                     10,196,925              10,187,031
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,000,000               6,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     7,720,982               7,870,847
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,496,742              23,013,763
<SALES>                                         77,484                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,817,998                 114,493
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  659,591                 187,854
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,181                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,082,226                (82,596)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,082,226                (82,596)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,082,226                (82,596)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.228                 (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.222                 (0.001)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005003EN.01000401.xml

| 6.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/4

---

Final report of the hearing officer in Case COMP/38.549 — Architects' Association

(delivered in accordance with Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of hearing officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(2005/C 3/04)

With regard to the right to be heard, the following observations can be made on the draft decision.

On 3 November 2003, following an own-initiative investigation, the Commission sent a statement of objections to the Belgian Architects' Association. The statement of objections argued that the setting of scales of fixed or recommended minimum fees was contrary to the rules on competition.

The Association was given access to the file on 2 December 2003.

The Association was allowed ten weeks to reply to the statement of objections. It submitted comments within that time.

The Association considered that its rights of defence had not been fully respected in the proceedings because it had not had access to a document that the directorate-general for Competition had classified ‘confidential’.

Upon examination it became clear that this document would have made it possible to identify a person who had supplied information to the Commission.

It had thus been classified ‘confidential’ quite rightly, given the duty of confidentiality that rests on the Commission in such cases.

The anonymity of a person who supplies information must be respected if that person so requests and may otherwise be open to reprisals (Court of Justice in Case 143/85 Adams v Commission, paragraphs 34 ff.).

Adams v Commission

The Association exercised its right to defend itself orally, at a hearing that took place on 9 February 2004.

The draft Commission Decision does not raise any fresh objections additional to those in the statement of objections previously addressed to the Association.

I consider, therefore, that the parties' right to be heard has been respected.

Brussels, 16 June 2004.

Serge DURANDE

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Horatio D. Moore, Jr., Appellant, v Oneida, Ltd., et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Mikoll, J.

Claimant retired after working 33 years for Oneida, Ltd., in a noisy work place, during which time his hearing was tested several times at the instance of Oneida and without charge to claimant. The tests were administered in the medical department by a nurse during work hours and claimant was not docked for the time. Claimant could not remember if the test results were discussed with him. Claimant stopped actual work on May 8,1978, the date he began a leave of absence for medical reasons unrelated to his hearing loss or this claim. He remained on leave or on inactive status until he formally retired effective April 1, 1980. On October 21, 1981, claimant saw his attending physician, who certified a noise-related hearing loss. Claimant filed his claim for compensation for hearing loss on October 30, 1981.

The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that the date of disability was November 6, 1978, six months after claimant’s last actual day of work. There is no question that the compensation claim, filed October 30, 1981, was not filed within two years of the date of claimant’s disability, as required by Workers’ Compensation Law § 29. The ALJ awarded benefits to claimant, impliedly finding that the administration of the periodic hearing tests had been an advance payment of compensation tolling the Statute of Limitations. The Workers’ Compensation Board, in reversing and disallowing the claim found "that the claim was not timely filed and that there is no evidence of an advance payment of compensation to waive late claim filing”. This appeal by claimant ensued.

An advance payment may take the form of medical treatment *(Gallahan v Papec Mach. Co.,*263 App Div 918). However, the determination of whether an advance payment has been made is factual and must be sustained if supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Urban v NYS Letchworth Vil.,*91 AD2d 1090). In the instant case, the Board could properly conclude that the periodic hearing tests were not *390administered to claimant for purposes of rendering treatment to him but rather for the purposes of the employer. The fact that claimant was apparently unaware that he had any hearing impairment requiring treatment during the period the tests were administered indicates that they were not considered treatment by claimant at that time. The determination of the Board is supported by substantial evidence. There should therefore be an affirmance.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Weiss, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 11083 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Michael Guy Stanbery,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:19

- CR

- 7

- 2

Before **Graves, Willett,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Guy Stanbery has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Stanbery has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 16, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-11083 Document: 00515901827 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2021No. 19

- 11083

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 19-11083 Document: 00515901827 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2021
# C_2005273EN.01000601.xml

| 4.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/6

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2005/C 273/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

AUSTRIA

Operating licences revoked

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CITY-JET Luftfahrtgesellschaft m.b.H. | Rengasse 4 |
| AT-1010 Wien |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

CITY-JET Luftfahrtgesellschaft m.b.H.

Rengasse 4

AT-1010 Wien

passengers, mail, cargo

16.9.2005

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---