alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1506 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1506

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 1997

   Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in 
addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To amend the Professional Boxing Safety Act (P.L.  104-272).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Professional 
Boxing Safety Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) is amended by--
            (1) redesignating section 15 as 16; and
            (2) inserting after section 14 the following:

``SEC. 15. PROTECTION FROM EXPLOITATION.

    ``(a) In General.--No person described in paragraph (4), (5), (6), 
or (9) of section 2 may require a boxer to employ, retain, or provide 
compensation to any individual or business enterprise (whether 
operating in corporate form or not) designated by that person as a 
condition of--
            ``(1) such person's working with the boxer as a licensee, 
        manager, matchmaker, or promoter;
            ``(2) such person's arranging for the boxer to participate 
        in a professional boxing match; or
            ``(3) such boxer's participation in a professional boxing 
        match.
    ``(b) Action to Enforce Contract.--In any action brought against a 
boxer by any such person, individual, or business enterprise to recover 
money for acting as a licensee, manager, matchmaker, or promoter for 
the boxer, the amount awarded may be reduced or denied, notwithstanding 
any agreement to the contrary, as violative of public policy if that 
person, individual, or enterprise is found by the court or 
administrative body before which the action was brought to have 
violated subsection (a) with respect to the boxer in connection with 
the subject of the action. Nothing in this subsection affects the 
enforcement of this Act under section 10.''.

            Passed the Senate November 9, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 18, 2021 / Notices 46327 

owned or controlled by, or for having 

acted or purported to act for or on behalf 

of, directly or indirectly, ALVARO 

LOPEZ MIERA, a person whose 

property and interests in property are 

blocked pursuant to the Order. 

Dated: August 13, 2021. 

Bradley T. Smith, 

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17718 Filed 8–17–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

Advisory Committee on Homeless 

Veterans; Notice of Meeting 

The Department of Veterans Affairs 

(VA) gives notice under the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., App. 

2., that a virtual meeting of the Advisory 

Committee on Homeless Veterans will 

be held September 14–15, 2021. The 

meeting sessions will begin and end 

each day from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

Eastern Standard Time (EST). The 

meeting sessions are open to the public. 

The purpose of the Committee is to 

provide the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

with an ongoing assessment of the 

effectiveness of the policies, 

organizational structures, and services 

of VA in assisting Veterans at risk of and 

experiencing homelessness. The 

Committee shall assemble, and review 

information related to the needs of 

homeless Veterans and provide advice 

on the most appropriate means of 

assisting this Veteran population. The 

Committee will make recommendations 

to the Secretary regarding such 

activities. 

On Tuesday, September 14 and 

Wednesday, September 15, 2021, the 

agenda will include briefings from VA 

and other federal agencies officials 

regarding services for homelessness 

among Veterans. The Committee will 

also discuss topics for its annual report 

and recommendations to the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs. 

No time will be allocated at this 

meeting for receiving oral presentations 

from the public. Interested parties 

should provide written comments on 

issues affecting homeless Veterans for 

review by the Committee to Leisa Davis, 

Designated Federal Officer, Veterans 

Health Administration Homeless 

Programs Office (11HPO), U.S. 

Department of Veterans Affairs, 811 

Vermont Avenue NW (11HPO), 

Washington, DC 20420, or via email at 

Leisa.Davis@va.gov. 

Members of the public who wish to 

attend should contact Leisa Davis of the 

Veterans Health Administration, 

Homeless Programs Office, at 

Leisa.Davis@va.gov or (202) 632–8588 

no later than September 1, 2021, 

providing their name, professional 

affiliation, email address, and phone 

number. Attendees who require 

reasonable accommodations should also 

state so in their requests. There will also 

be a call-in number: 1 872–701–0185, 

access code: 900 779 535. 

Dated: August 13, 2021. 

Jelessa M. Burney, 

Federal Advisory Committee Management 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17730 Filed 8–17–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR VALLEY NATIONAL GASES INCORPORATED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001030715
<NAME> VALLEY NATIONAL GASES INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         376,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,523,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                   454,981
<INVENTORY>                                 11,423,288
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,779,370
<PP&E>                                      76,617,183
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,901,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,821,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,785,829
<BONDS>                                     55,841,155
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,620
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,689,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               107,821,831
<SALES>                                     26,447,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,447,077
<CGS>                                       12,579,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,579,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,697,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,116,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,128,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                   474,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            654,749
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   654,749
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ROBERT NORMAN CASTER, 6:14-CV-01006-JE

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Commissioner, Social Security

Administration,

 Defendant.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and

Recommendation (#19) on April 27, 2016, in which he recommends

this Court remand this case to the Commissioner for further

proceedings. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall,

 - 1 ORDER

Case 6:14-cv-01006-JE Document 21 Filed 05/18/16 Page 1 of 2
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not

find any error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and

Recommendation (#19). Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the

Commissioner's decision and REMANDS this case to the Commissioner

for further proceedings consistent with the Findings and

Recommendation and this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 18th day of May, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

 - 2 ORDER

Case 6:14-cv-01006-JE Document 21 Filed 05/18/16 Page 2 of 2
matechexh10_24.htm


    
      

    

     

    Exhibit 10.24

     

     

    AMENDMENT DATED OCTOBER
11, 2007 TO
CLASS A SENIOR SECURED
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE


     

    
      The following
provisions are hereby incorporated into, and are hereby made a part of, that
certain Class A Senior Secured Convertible Debenture dated September 23, 2003,
and that certain Amendment to Class A Senior Secured Convertible Debenture dated
October 27, 2006 (collectively, the “Debenture”) between Material Technologies,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Palisades Capital, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company (the “Holder”) and such provisions are
effective retroactively to the date of the Debenture (the “Effective
Date”).  All capitalized terms in this Amendment to Debenture, to the
extent not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings assigned to such
terms in the Debenture.

1.       The
Maturity Date shall be extended to December 31,
2009.

2.       All other provisions of
the Debenture remain
unchanged.


          IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to Debenture to
be duly executed and delivered as of October 11, 2007.



        
          	COMPANY: 	 	 	HOLDER:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  MATERIAL TECHNOLOGIES,
      INC., 

                  a Delaware
      corporation

                	 	 	
                  PALISADES
      CAPITAL, LLC,

                  a Nevada
      limited liability company

                	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/ Robert M.
      Bernstein

                	 	 	
                  /s/ Reid
      Breitman

                	 
	
                  By: 
      Robert M. Bernstein

                	 	 	
                  By: 
      Reid Breitman

                	 
	
                  Its: 
      Chief Executive Officer 

                	 	 	
                  Its: 
      President
Opinion issued January 7, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00976-CR

NO. 01-19-00977-CR

NO. 01-19-00978-CR

———————————

IN RE DAVID RODRIGUEZ, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, David Rodriguez, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus 

seeking to compel the trial court to rule on all motions filed in three cases.1

 

1 The underlying cases are State of Texas v. David Rodriguez, Cause Numbers 

1595712, 1595713, 1600804, pending in the 174th District Court of Harris County, 

Texas, the Honorable Hazel B. Jones presiding.
2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.2 We dismiss any pending motions 

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

2 Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus does not comply with Rule 52.3. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.3(a)–(k).
Kathryn Tassinari, OSB # 80115 

Robert A. Baron, OSB # 89020 

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. 

474 Willamette Street 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 686-1969 

kathrynt50@comcast.net 

Of Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

BRYAN A. FULLER, 

Plaintiff, 

VS. 

COMMISSIONER, 

Social Security Administration , 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Defendant. ) ------=-===-==-=:==---~ 

Case No. 6:14-cv-01993-MC 

ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY 

FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $5,005.05 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 

(EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this award shall be paid via check made payable to 

Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorneys at Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C., 474 

Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, the award shall be made 

payable to Plaintiff's attorney if the commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the 

government through the federal treasury offset program. There are no costs or expenses to be 

paid herein. ,,. 

'--

Dated this ____ day of November 2016. 

PRESENTED BY: 

s/ Kathryn Tassinari 

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C. 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

l __ _ 

Michael J. McShane 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 6:14-cv-01993-MC Document 27 Filed 11/02/16 Page 1 of 1
Kathryn Tassinari, OSB # 80115 

Brent Wells, OSB # 85403 

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. 

474 Willamette Street 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 686-1969 

kathrynt50@comcast.net 

Of Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JAMES R. SIPE, ) 

) Case No. 6:14-cv-02026-YY

Plaintiff, ) 

vs. ) 

) ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY 

COMMISSIONER, ) FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

Social Security Administration , ) 

) 

) 

____________Defendant._________)

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $5,090.05 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 

(EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this award shall be paid via check made payable to 

Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorneys at Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C., 474 

Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, the award shall be made 

payable to Plaintiff’s attorney if the commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the 

government through the federal treasury offset program. There are no costs or expenses to be 

paid herein. 

Dated this day of September 2016. 

_____________________________

Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You

PRESENTED BY: 

s/ Kathryn Tassinari 

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C. 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

7th

/s/Youlee Yim You

Case 6:14-cv-02026-YY Document 33 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate~** 

# <!Court of**§ppeaI~** 

# for !bejfeberaI <!Circuit

ROKSOLIANA DACHNIWSKYJ, Petitioner, 

### v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent, AND 

### THERESA DACHNIWSKYJ, Intervenor. 2011-3158 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. CH0831100439-I-1. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER The Office of Personnel Management moves for an extension of time, until February 16, 2012, to file its response brief. Upon consideration thereof,DACHNIWSKYJ v. OPM 2 

### IT Is ORDERED 

### THAT: The motion is granted. No further extensions should be anticipated. 

## JAN 11 2012 Date cc: Janice Lea Boback, Esq. s21 Dmytro Kurywczak, Esq. Hillary

### A. Stern, Esq. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 

### FILED U.s. COURTOFAPPEALS FOR THE FEDERt.lCIRCUIT



### JAN 172012

JANHORBALY 

### • CLERK
Filed 6/24/21 P. v. Atkins CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

GENE ATKINS

,

Defendant and Appellant. B 306143

(Los Angeles County Super.

Ct. No. BA227949 )

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los

Angeles County, Laura F. Priver , Judge. Dismissed

.

Cynthia L. Barnes , under appointment by the Court of

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance by for Plaintiff and Respondent.

__________________________2 In 2002, defendant was convicted of multiple counts of

criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422) and a single count of stalking

(§ 646.9, subd. (b)). 1 The court sentenced him to a lengthy prison

term. In addition, the court required defendant to pay a
restitution fine of $10,000 (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)) and imposed and

suspended an identical parole revocation fine (§ 1202.45)

. In April 202 0, defendant filed a motion to amend the

abstract to eliminate the fines , apparently relying on an order

issued by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors

. 2 The

trial court denied the motion. Defendant filed a timely notice of

appeal of the denial o f this postjudgment motion.

On appeal, appointed counsel filed a brief indicating an

inability to identify any appealable issues, and requesting this

court follow the procedures of People v. Serrano (201 2 )

211 Cal.App.4th 496. Under Serrano , when a defe ndant appeals

from a postjudgment order, and counsel has found no arguable

issues, the court is to inform defendant of his right to file a

supplemental brief. Thereafter, the court will either retain the

appeal or dismiss it as abandoned. ( Id. at pp. 503

- 504.)

On April 13, 2021, we informed defendant of his right to file

a supplemental brief under Serrano

. Appointed counsel also

informed defendant of his right to file a supplemental brief. The

time has expired and defendant has filed no brief. Dismiss al of

the appeal is warranted.

1 All undesignated statutory references are to the Penal

Code.

2 The motion is not part of the record on appeal. The clerk conducted a diligent search and could not find it. Defendant’s appellate counsel inquired of defendant; he did not have a copy.3 DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

RUBIN, P. J.

WE CONCUR:

MOOR, J.

KIM, J.
03C5044 Bruce G. Howell, et al vs. Carl F. Koenemann, et al Page 1 of 1

Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 03 C 5044 DATE 3/17/2008

CASE

TITLE

Bruce G. Howell, et al vs. Carl F. Koenemann, et al

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Motion hearing held. Defendants have asked the court to stay further proceedings in light of the Court of

Appeals’ acceptance of their Rule 23(f) appeal. The issues to be resolved on summary judgment are the same

whether or not a class is certified, however. The motion to stay [339] is denied. On Plaintiff’s oral motion,

dates for briefing on motions for summary judgment extended as follows: Response 3/27/2008; Replies

4/25/2008. 

Docketing to mail notices.

00:03

 Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

ETV

Case 1:03-cv-05044 Document 351 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the foregoing Report on Form 10-K pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

 

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

 
| Date:  | April 29,   2020 | By:                              | /s/   Wayne-Kent A. Bradshaw |
|--------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|------------------------------|
|   |                  | Wayne-Kent   A. Bradshaw         |
|   |                  | Chief   Executive Officer        |
|   |                  | Broadway   Financial Corporation |

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Irving Miller, Deceased. Margot M. Jacobs et al., Appellants; Edward Lee et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding for a final judicial settlement of the accounts of the trustees of the testamentary marital and nonmarital trusts of Irving Miller, deceased, objectants Margot M. Jacobs and Renee M. Tyroler appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated November 15, 1983, which dismissed certain objections to the final and supplemental account of the trustees.

Order affirmed, with costs payable by appellants personally.

Irving Miller died a resident of Nassau County on March 25, 1958. He was survived by his widow, Mildred L. Miller, a son and two daughters. Certain objections to the final judicial settlement of the accounts of the trustees of the testamentary *581marital and nonmarital trusts of the testator have been previously resolved by this court *(Matter of Miller,*99 AD2d 780). The instant appeal is from an order dismissing all remaining objections. We affirm.

Although attorney trustee Edward Lee discarded certain records concerning the trust and others were accidentally lost, there was no proof that any pecuniary loss to the estate resulted and the trustees’ commissions are not, therefore, subject to forfeiture *(see, Matter of Ludlam,*24 NY2d 828; *Matter of Baker,*249 App Div 265; 2 Scott, Trusts § 205 [2d ed]).

We are persuaded by the evidence presented at the hearing that there were justifiable reasons for maintaining a portion of the trust assets in interest-bearing checking and savings accounts at commercial banks, upon the advice of investment counsel. The fact that slightly more income would have been earned had the trust purchased Treasury bills or commercial paper instead does not establish a breach of fiduciary duty which would entitle the estate to a surcharge *(see, Matter of Bank of New York,*35 NY2d 512; EPTL 11-2.2).

We have reviewed objectants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#### Wallace Mayo, Appellant, *v.*Sallie M. Davidge et al., Respondents.

(Submitted October 16, 1890;

decided October 31, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made the second Monday in February, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

*659
      *Henry Sanger Snow*for appellant.

*Francis*C. *Cantine*for respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.__