alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul Katzeff, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;



5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the Equivalent functions);



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: |  | November 12, 2005                    
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Paul Katzeff                     
|      |  | Paul Katzeff, Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT,COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MEDFORD DIVISION 

JAMES HAROLD ROSSI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HONORABLE RANDOLPH LEE GARRISON, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

PANNER, District Judge: 

1:14-cv-01642-CL 

ORDER 

On November 10, 2014, Defendant Bowers filed a motion to 

dismiss (#4). Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and 

Recommendation (#9), and the matter is now before this Court. See 

2e u.s.c. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed 

objections (#17) and I have reviewed the file of this case de 

novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. 

1 - ORDER 

Case 1:14-cv-01642-CL Document 18 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 2
Cormnodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). 

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. 

In his Objections, Plaintiff appears to concede that he cannot 

sustain a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and that he has not 

properly pled his claim for abuse of process. Plaintiff also 

appears to endorse Judge Clarke's recormnendation that the case be 

dismissed with leave to amend. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report 

and Recormnendation (#9). 

This action is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff 

shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an 

amended complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ~day of April, 2015. 

0~&~ OWEN M. PANNER 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

2 - ORDER 

Case 1:14-cv-01642-CL Document 18 Filed 04/07/15 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 28, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00383

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.S. AND W.S., CHILDREN,

From the 38th Judicial District Court

, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- 10

- 32406

- CV Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s brief is currently due December 28, 2020. On December 22, 2020, appellee filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief until February 8, 2021, for a total extension of 42 days. After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee to file her brief by February 8, 2021.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of December, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


Exhibit 10.5




SECOND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT




This Second Employment Agreement Amendment (this "Amendment"), dated November 24, 2008, is by and between Glowpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter "Glowpoint"), and Joseph Laezza (hereinafter "Employee").  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement (as defined below).




WHEREAS, Employee and Glowpoint entered into an Employment Agreement on March 11, 2004, as amended May 15, 2007 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”); 




WHEREAS, Employee became the Company’s President on June 7, 2008, in addition to his position as Chief Operating Officer; and




WHEREAS, the Employee’s employment term is currently scheduled to expire on January 1, 2009; and




WHEREAS, the Company wishes to extend Employee’s employment term, and Employee wishes to continue to work for Company;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.

Term; Position.  The Employment Agreement is hereby amended to (x) delete “for the two year period commencing as of January 1, 2007” in the first sentence of Section 1.1 and replace it with “until January 31, 2011” and (y) replace all references to “Chief Operating Officer” with “President and Chief Operating Officer”.




2.

Entire Agreement.  This Amendment is the final, complete and exclusive agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous proposals, understandings, representations, warranties, promises and other communications, whether oral or written, relating to such subject matter.  Unless specifically amended by this Amendment, all terms of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged and are in full force and effect.  If any provision of the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable for any reason, the remaining provisions hereof shall be unaffected and remain in full force and effect. 




In Witness Whereof, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.  




					
	Glowpoint, Inc.

	 
	 

	By:

	/s/ MICHAEL BRANDOFINO

	 
	 
	/s/ JOSEPH LAEZZA


	 
	Michael Brandofino, CEO

	 
	 
	Joseph Laezza
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

TERRY PAUL HEDIN, 3:14-CV-01504-CL

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

 

JUAN D. CASTILLO, 

Regional Director;

MARION FEATHER, 

Warden FCI Sheridan; 

RICHARD KOWALCZYK, 

Head Chaplain FCI Sheridan; 

and DANIEL WILLIAMS, 

Chaplain FCI Sheridan,

 Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued Findings and

Recommendation (#63) on September 27, 2016, in which he

recommends the Court grant Defendants' Motion (#56) for Summary

Judgment and dismiss this matter with prejudice. Plaintiff filed

timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter

is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

1 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01504-CL Document 67 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 2
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make

a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's

report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561

F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s Objections

and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings

and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and

Recommendation (#63). The Court, therefore, GRANTS Defendants’

Motion (#56) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 23rd day of November, 2016.

 s/ Anna J. Brown 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01504-CL Document 67 Filed 11/23/16 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10


EXHIBIT 10.48 




Description of Oral Extension-W. Browne Promissory Note




Summary of Terms of the Orally Agreed upon Extension to following Simple Promissory Note (with corresponding exhibit number of original note) under which Registrant is the Borrower. No periodic payments are required and principal and interest are due on the extended due date.




	Original

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Note

	 
	 
	Original

	Oral

	 
	Annual


	Exhibit

	 
	Loan

	Due

	Extension

	 
	%


	Number

	Lender

	Date

	Date

	Date

	Principal

	Rate


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	10.7

	W. Browne

	2/16/2006

	11/01/2007

	12/31/2008

	$50,000.00

	10%
EXHIBIT 12.1


SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CALCULATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
(Dollars In Thousands)



Funds from operations before fixed charges:
   Income (loss)                                       $8,999
   Interest:
     Expense incurred                                  10,254
     Amortization of deferred financing costs             243
                                                  ------------
     Total                                            $19,496
                                                  ============

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                                   $10,254
   Interest capitalized                                 1,768
   Rental fixed charges                                    41
   Amortization of deferred financing costs               243
                                                  ------------
     Total                                            $12,306
                                                  ============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      $1.58
                                                  ============
Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 228 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1801
Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 228 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:1802
Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 228 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:1803
Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 228 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:1804
Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 228 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:1805
Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 228 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:1806
Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 228 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:1807
Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 228 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:1808
Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 228 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:1809
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1161 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1161

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize appropriations 
   for refugee and entrant assistance for fiscal years 1998 and 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR REFUGEE AND ENTRANT 
              ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 414(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1524(a)) is amended by 
striking ``fiscal year 1995, fiscal year 1996, and fiscal year 1997'' 
and inserting ``each of fiscal years 1998 and 1999''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect October 1, 1997.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1650 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1650

    To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic quartz substrates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 1998

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic quartz substrates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC QUARTZ SUBSTRATES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
    

         ``    9902.70.06     Synthetic quartz                                                                  
                               substrates                                                                       
                               imported into                                                                    
                               the United                                                                       
                               States in bulk                                                                   
                               or in forms or                                                                   
                               packages for                                                                     
                               retail sale                                                                      
                               (provided for in                                                                 
                               subheading                                                                       
                               7006.00.40).....  Free        No change        No change       On or before      
                                                                                               12/31/2000       
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
From: Mike Brooks

To: Galloway, Stephen

Cc: Keating, Reilley; Lee, Rachel C.; Holland, Darise

Subject: Re: Brooks v. Agate Resources; Ninth Circuit Case No. 19-35547 [SR-ACTIVE.FID3130539]

Date: Friday, September 4, 2020 6:20:46 PM

I want to be Clear about this. These records were sent to the US Supreme Court snd to the

usual third party that will make everything public if I or a member if my family is harmed in

any way. As far as I can determine, none of these were covered under Aiken’s gag order and

she would have no say. Trillium and Centene, and I have Elizabeth McClarey’s records

showing Centene has been paying you and giving you directions, so just drop the Agate

Resources garbage right now. Trillium executives, Russo, Aiken, and Stoel Rives defamed

never and wrecked my health. You need to understand that this isn’t a game you will be

allowed to win. Evil will not prevail. God knows you horrible monsters harmed innocent

children, minorities, the aged, the sick, the poor, and it is God’s work to see you stopped. It’s

over. Get right with God or suffer the consequences.

Mike

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 4, 2020, at 5:57 PM, Mike Brooks <mibrooks@mac.com> wrote:

Did not receive the DVD? There is something wrong. I was unaware that there

were any DVD’s with the filing to the Ninth Circuit. The sealed exhibits went to

the US Supreme Court and I am excluding you and everyone else from that data.

It is records of foreign nationals. If you request them, I will feel obliged to send

that information to the governments of those foreign nationals, mainly students,

Mike Brooks

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 4, 2020, at 5:36 PM, Galloway, Stephen

<stephen.galloway@stoel.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Brooks,

On or about August 28, we received your (1) Answer Defense Motion to

Exclude Evidence; and (2) letter to the Ninth Circuit, which it docketed as

a motion to seal three DVDs. We have not received copies of the DVDs or

the exhibits contained on them.

As we have expressed to you multiple times now, we do not object to you

EXHIBIT 6 

Page 1 of 2

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 92-6 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 2
filing medical records or protected health information under seal, but if

you are going to rely on such exhibits, we are entitled to copies. That is

especially true where, as here, some of the documents at issue appear to

be Agate’s own billing records. Please let me know if you will provide us

with copies of the three DVDs referenced in your letter, and if not,

whether you oppose a motion to strike those exhibits.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your

response.

Regards,

Stephen H. Galloway | Of Counsel

STOEL RIVES LLP | 760 SW Ninth Avenue, Suite 3000 | Portland, OR 97205

Direct: (503) 294-9369 | Mobile: (503) 367-6832

stephen.galloway@stoel.com | Bio | vCard | www.stoel.com

This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged, and/or attorney

work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized

review, use, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful.

EXHIBIT 6 

Page 2 of 2

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 92-6 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0142 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHEYENE LEILANI

– AMBER ZIELIE,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 5, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 29 2024

01/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0142
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 13-11614

Non-Argument Calendar

_____________

D. C. Docket No. 9:10-cv-80769-KAM

RICHARD JAIMES,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

a corporation,

 Defendant-Appellant.

______________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

______________

(October 29, 2013)

Before DUBINA, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-11614 Date Filed: 10/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

This appeal involves attorneys’ fees. Defendant-Appellant GEICO General 

Insurance Company’s (“GEICO”) sole argument on appeal is that if the final 

judgment entered by the district court is vacated as requested by GEICO in appeal 

No. 124427, the award of attorneys’ fees to Appellee Richard Jaimes (“Jaimes”) 

should likewise be vacated. Because our court has affirmed the final judgment in 

appeal No. 12-14427, see Jaimes v. GEICO General Insurance Co., Nos. 12-14427 

& 13-10847 (11th Cir. Aug. 15, 2013), we also affirm the district court’s order 

awarding attorneys’ fees to Jaimes in the present appeal (No. 13-11614). 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-11614 Date Filed: 10/29/2013 Page: 2 of 2