alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 – OPINION AND ORDER 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC, 

 No. 3:15-cv-220-AC 

 Plaintiff, 

 OPINION AND ORDER 

v. 

VLADAMIR IVASHENTSEV, 

 Defendant. 

MOSMAN, J., 

On February 11, 2016, Magistrate Judge Acosta issued his Findings and 

Recommendation (F&R) [40], recommending attorney fees be awarded in the amount of 

$6,708.00 and costs be awarded in the amount of $892.00. No objections to the Findings and 

Recommendation were filed. 

DISCUSSION 

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

Case 3:15-cv-00220-AC Document 42 Filed 03/05/16 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [40] 

as my own opinion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 5th day of March, 2016. 

 /s/ Michael W. Mosman _ 

 MICHAEL W. MOSMAN 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-00220-AC Document 42 Filed 03/05/16 Page 2 of 2
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1537

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on Benzoic acid, 2-[[1-

[[(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl) amino].

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on Benzoic

acid, 2-[[1-[[(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)

amino].

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BENZOIC ACID,

4 2-[[1-[[(2,3-DIHYDRO-2-OXO-1H-BENZIMIDAZOL5 5-YL) AMINO].

6 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar7 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

8 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:
2

S 1537 IS

‘‘ 9902.32.XX Benzoic acid, 2-

[[1-[[(2,3-dihydro2-oxo-1Hbenzimidazol-5-yl)

amino] provided

for in subheading

3204.17.90 ........... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Research Program Support: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Research Program Support People & Locations







Jason  Huegel
                        Research Program Support

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker Supervisor
                        Phone: (515) 337-7589
                        
                        
                        Fax: (515) 337-7149(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 45984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice: 2021-6021]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Banks of the United States (EXIM), as part 
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the 
proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995. The Application for Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export Credit 
Insurance Policy will be used to determine the eligibility of the 
applicant and the transaction for Export-Import Bank assistance under 
its insurance program. Export-Import Bank customers will be able to 
submit this form on paper or electronically.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 18, 2021 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB 10-02) or by email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e3a2f3c2f603e2b202a2b3c0e2b36272360292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="01756073602f71646f656473416479686c2f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>, or by 
mail to Tara Pender, Export-Import Bank of the United States, 811 
Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The application tool can be reviewed 
at: http://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files/pub/pending/eib92-50.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information, 
please Tara Pender. 202-565-3655.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This collection of information is necessary, 
pursuant to 12 U.S.C. Sec. 635(a)(1), to determine eligibility of the 
applicant for EXIM assistance.
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-50 Application for Short-Term Multi-
Buyer Export Credit Insurance Policy.
    OMB Number: 3048-0023.
    Type of Review: Renewal.
    Need and Use: The Application for Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export 
Credit Insurance Policy will be used to determine the eligibility of 
the applicant and the transaction for Export-Import Bank assistance 
under its insurance program.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 285.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 0.5 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 143.
    Frequency of Reporting of Use: As needed.
    Government Reviewing Time per Year:
    Reviewing time per year: 285 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.50.
    Average Cost per Year: $12,113 (time * wages).
    Benefits and Overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $14,535.

Bassam Doughman,
IT Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2021-17646 Filed 8-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                            
|Cornelis F. Wit                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

May 15, 2008
Amendment to Potlatch Corporation Salaried Employees' Supplemental Plan



 Exhibit 10.5 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 POTLATCH CORPORATION 
 SALARIED EMPLOYEES’ SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN 
 The Potlatch Corporation Salaried Employees’
Supplemental Benefit Plan, as amended through May 24, 2005 (the “Plan”), is hereby further amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2009: 
 Section 3(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by revising the second paragraph thereof to read as follows: 
 “Through December 31 of the Plan Year preceding the Plan Year in which payment of the Participant’s entire Savings Plan Supplemental Benefit is made, the amount credited to such bookkeeping account shall be credited with
earnings and losses based on the following: 
 (i) For periods prior to January 1, 2009, earnings shall be calculated
using an interest rate equal to 70% of the higher of the following averages, compounded annually: (i) the prime rate charged by the major commercial banks as of the first business day of each month (as reported in an official publication of the
Federal Reserve System) or (ii) the average monthly long-term rate of A-rated corporate bonds (as published in Moody’s Bond Record). 
 (ii) For periods on and after January 1, 2009 and prior to the date determined under Section 3(b)(iii), earnings shall be calculated using an interest rate equal to 120% of the long-term applicable federal
rate, with quarterly compounding, as published under Section 1274(d) of the Code for the first month of each calendar quarter. 
 (iii) Effective as soon as practicable after January 1, 2009 as determined by the Committee (as defined in Section 4(a)), for Participant groups identified by the Committee, earnings and losses shall be calculated by reference to
the rate of return on one or more of the investment alternatives that are available under the Potlatch Corporation Salaried 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) and which are designated by the Committee as available under this Plan. Each
Participant may select (in ten percent (10%) increments) which investment alternative(s) will be used for this purpose with respect to his or her bookkeeping account, and the alternative(s) selected need not be the same as the Participant has
selected under the 401(k) Plan, but any such selection will apply only prospectively. The Committee shall determine how frequently such selections may be changed.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
HAGLER BAILLY, INC. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                0001033693
<NAME>               HAGLER BAILLY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000  
<CASH>                                          3,498,671
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,933,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,054,967
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25,148,703
<PP&E>                                          3,831,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,568,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,219,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,929,771
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           54,825
<OTHER-SE>                                      9,665,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   36,219,048
<SALES>                                        36,404,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               36,404,833
<CGS>                                          27,866,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  27,866,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                534,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,865,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,582,755
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,282,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,282,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.37
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUMMIT PROPERTIES FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,823
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,086,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 990,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        601,872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     347,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   990,000
<SALES>                                        104,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,066
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (185)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on his knowledge and belief: 1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Austin L. Roberts, III                     
|Austin L. Roberts, III, Chief Executive Officer
|                                               
|/s/ Deborah M. Evans                           
|Deborah M. Evans, Treasurer                    

August 1, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will be retained by Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and
its staff upon request.
#### Catalina Flores, Respondent, v BAJ Holding Corp., Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 202]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), entered August 8, 2011, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

*946Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This action arises from the plaintiffs alleged slip and fall on black ice on the exterior stairs of the residential multiple dwelling in which she resided.

A real property owner or a party in possession or control of real property will be held liable for injuries sustained in a slip- and-fall accident involving snow and ice on its property only when it created the alleged dangerous condition or had actual or constructive notice of it *(see Cantwell v Fox Hill Community Assn., Inc.,*87 AD3d 1106 [2011]; *Crosthwaite v Acadia Realty Trust,*62 AD3d 823 [2009]; *Abbattista v King’s Grant Master Assn., Inc.,*39 AD 3d 439 [2007]; *Nielsen v Metro-North Commuter R.R. Co.,*30 AD3d 497 [2006]). Thus, a defendant who moves for summary judgment in a slip-and-fall case has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that it neither created the hazardous, condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it *(see Santoliquido v Roman Catholic Church of Holy Name of Jesus,*37 AD3d 815, 815-816 [2007]). Only after this threshold burden has been satisfied will the court examine the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]).

Under the circumstances presented here, the defendant failed to meet its initial burden as the movant *(see Medina v La Fiura Dev. Corp.,*69 AD3d 686 [2010]; *Baines v G&D Ventures, Inc.,*64 AD3d 528, 529 [2009]; *Totten v Cumberland Farms, Inc.,*57 AD3d 653, 654 [2008]; *Strange v Colgate Design Corp.,*6 AD3d 422 [2004]). We agree with the Supreme Court that the deposition transcripts submitted by the defendant in support of its motion were irreconcilably contradictory as to, among other things, the weather conditions preceding the accident, the duration of the existence of the patch of ice on which the injured plaintiff allegedly fell, whether or not the defendant created the hazardous condition and, if not, whether or not the defendant was on notice of the icy condition. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d at 853; *Mignogna v 7-Eleven, Inc.,*76 AD3d 1054, 1055 [2010]; *Strange v Colgate Design Corp.,*6 AD3d at 423). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Chambers and Cohen, JJ., concur.
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 April 19, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-14761

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00160-CR-1-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

SALVADOR RODRIGUEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(April 19, 2005)

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Salvador Rodriguez appeals his 77-month sentence for illegal reentry into

the United States after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. sections 1326(a) and
2

(b)(2). Rodriguez argues that the enhancements to his sentence based on his

previous convictions violated the Sixth Amendment. We affirm the sentence. 

Because Rodriguez objected to the sentence enhancements in the district

court, we review the challenges to his sentence de novo. United States v. Sanchez,

269 F.3d 1250, 1272 (11th Cir. 2002) (en banc). We will not reverse the district

court if any error was harmless. Id. An error is harmless if it did not affect the

substantial rights of the parties. United States v. Hernandez, 160 F.3d 661, 670

(11th Cir. 1998). 

Rodriguez challenge to his sentence fails. In United States v. Booker, the

Supreme Court reaffirmed that the rule announced in Apprendi does not extend to

previous convictions. 543 U.S. __, 125 S. Ct. 738, 756 (2005). The Sixth

Amendment was not violated, therefore, when the district court calculated the

guideline sentence and accounted for Rodriguez’s previous convictions. 

Furthermore, any error committed by the district court in sentencing Rodriguez

under the guidelines, as mandatory, was harmless, because the district court stated

that were the guidelines not mandatory it would have imposed a sentence of 15

years’ imprisonment, more than twice that actually received by Rodriguez. 

AFFIRMED.