alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex4_1.htm






EXHIBIT 4.1

 





 



 







 




 


	 	 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ____________________HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS AND TRANSFERS UNTO __________ , ____________________SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTICATE
AND DOES HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT ____________________ AS THE ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE WITHIN NAMED CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES.	 



 







	

 

	DATED:	 	

, 200

	  	 .
	 	   	 	 	 	 








	 	

IN PRESENCE OF:

	 	  	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	  	Witness:	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	  	 	  	 	 
	 	  	By:	

 

	 	 
	 	  	 	  	 	 
	 	  	 	  	 	 
	 	  	Shareholder:	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	  	 	  	 	 
	 	  	By:	

 

	 	 
	 	  	 	  	 	 
	 	  	 	  	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	 	 




 


	 	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. 	 



 

THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS INSTRUMENT ARE NOT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS, DEPOSITS OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS OF A BANK AND ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY.

 



THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS INSTRUMENT HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "SECURITIES ACT"), OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE AND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF EXCEPT WHILE A REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING THERETO IS IN EFFECT UNDER SUCH ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE
SECURITIES LAWS OR PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER SUCH ACT OR SUCH LAWS. EACH PURCHASER OF THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS INSTRUMENT IS NOTIFIED THAT THE SELLER MAY BE RELYING ON THE EXEMPTION FROM SECTION 5 OF THE SECURITIES ACT PROVIDED BY RULE 144A THEREUNDER. ANY TRANSFEREE OF THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS INSTRUMENT BY ITS ACCEPTANCE HEREOF (1) REPRESENTS THAT IT IS A "QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL
BUYER" (AS DEFINED IN RULE 144A UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT), (2) AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT OFFER, SELL OR OTHERWISE TRANSFER THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS INSTRUMENT EXCEPT (A) PURSUANT TO A REGISTRATION STATEMENT WHICH IS THEN EFFECTIVE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, (B) FOR SO LONG AS THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS INSTRUMENT ARE ELIGIBLE FOR RESALE PURSUANT TO RULE 144A, TO A PERSON IT REASONABLY BELIEVES IS A "QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER" AS DEFINED IN RULE 144A UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT THAT PURCHASES FOR
ITS OWN ACCOUNT OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF A QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER TO WHOM NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT THE TRANSFER IS BEING MADE IN RELIANCE ON RULE 144A, (C) TO THE ISSUER OR (D) PURSUANT TO ANY OTHER AVAILABLE EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND (3) AGREES THAT IT WILL GIVE TO EACH PERSON TO WHOM THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS INSTRUMENT ARE TRANSFERRED A NOTICE SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE EFFECT OF THIS LEGEND.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

DUFFIN LIKES, 

Plaintiff, 

3: 13-CV-00710-BR 

vs. 

CAROLYN COL VIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of$2,327.44 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree that attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent 

upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (20 I 0). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff's attorney and 

mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, 

OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at the address stated above. 

DATEDthis q~ayof 1f<ll ,2014. 

United 

A~ States District Court Judge 

Case 3:13-cv-00710-BR Document 21 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 1
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 Exhibit 10(b)  


 
 

  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    
    


        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File
No. 811-8108) of our report dated March 28, 2008 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appear in Protective Life Insurance Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form N-4 of our report dated April 24, 2008, relating to the financial statements of The Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account. 




  



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

November 25, 2008 











QuickLinks


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHIRLEY INGRID PATRICIA

TURANGAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71967

Agency No. A095-875-537

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 16, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Shirley Ingrid Patricia Turangan, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her

motion to reconsider and to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion the BIA’s

FILED

APR 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-71967

denial of motions to reconsider or reopen. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964

(9th Cir. 2002). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Turangan’s motion to

reconsider where Turangan did not point to any error of law or fact in the BIA’s

underlying decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1). 

Finally, with respect to the BIA’s denial of her motion to reopen, Turangan

does not challenge the BIA’s conclusion that she failed to show her religious

studies established a prima facie case that it is more likely than not she would face

persecution in Indonesia. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60

(9th Cir. 1996) (issues not supported by argument are deemed waived).

We lack jurisdiction to review any challenge made to the BIA’s October 20,

2010, Order because the petition is not timely as to that decision. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(b)(1); Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference  of our report dated  December 18, 2000  included in this Form 10-KSB,
into  Bio-Imaging   Technologies,   Inc.  and  subsidiaries'   previously  filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-90412,  33-74152 and 33-22661)
and on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-75370 and 33-25477).

                                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Princeton, New Jersey

December 18, 2000
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Beltsville Agricultural Research Center: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Douglas R Robinson
                        Facilities Division

                        




                        
                        Plumber
                        Phone: (301) 504-8318
                        
                        
                        Fax: (301) 504-6729(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research: Mississippi State, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Mississippi State, Mississippi Crop Science Research Laboratory Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research People & Locations







Sadia  Shammi
                        Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research

                        




                        
                        Post Doc (Research Associate)
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          24,088
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          33,201
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,263,384
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,275,349
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,664,982
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,276,734
<SHORT-TERM>                                   205,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             64,108
<LONG-TERM>                                    933,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           340
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,664,982
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 45,230
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               38,906
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                84,136
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              25,026
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,814
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           30,322
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,590
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,365
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,339
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,339
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,670
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.93
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,512
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,331
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 16,052
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,088
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      514
<RECOVERIES>                                       102
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,266
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,511
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            755


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Almonte, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 344]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), rendered on or about April 30, 2009, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may *568thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

LEE WALTERS, M.D., 3:14-cv-01173-PK

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

 

VITAMIN SHOPPE INDUSTRIES, INC.,

a Delaware corporation,

 Defendant.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and

Recommendation (#44) on May 13, 2015, in which he recommends this

Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss as to each of

Plaintiff’s claims, deny as moot that portion of Defendant’s

Motion in which Defendant seeks to strike Plaintiff’s class

allegations, and dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint

1 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01173-PK Document 49 Filed 06/25/15 Page 1 of 3
(#21) in its entirety with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge also

recommends this Court enter judgment in favor of Defendant and

dismiss Plaintiff’s claims in their entirety. The matter is now

before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make

a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's

report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561

F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).

Plaintiff filed timely Objections to Magistrate Judge

Papak’s Findings and Recommendation in which Plaintiff contends

the Magistrate Judge erred when he found the contract that was

formed between Plaintiff and Defendant when Plaintiff purchased

the vitamins at issue was not unconscionable because Defendant

did not violate Federal Department of Agriculture (FDA) labeling

rules. In the alternative, Plaintiff contends this matter should

be stayed pending a determination by the FDA regarding the

sufficiency of the labeling on the vitamin packages at issue.

This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s Objections

and concludes Plaintiff’s Objections do not provide a basis to

modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has

reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does

2 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01173-PK Document 49 Filed 06/25/15 Page 2 of 3
not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and

Recommendation (#44) and, therefore, GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to

Dismiss as to each of Plaintiff’s claims, DENIES as moot that

portion of Defendant’s Motion in which Defendant seeks to strike

Plaintiff’s class allegations, and DISMISSES with prejudice

Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (#21) in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 25th day of June, 2015.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

_____________________________ 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

3 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01173-PK Document 49 Filed 06/25/15 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1199 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1199

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 regarding income protection 
                    allowances for certain students.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 19, 1997

   Ms. Collins (for herself, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Hollings, and Mr. Robb) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 regarding income protection 
                    allowances for certain students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCOME PROTECTION ALLOWANCES.

    (a) Income Protection Allowance for Dependent Students.--Section 
475(g)(2)(D) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087oo(g)(2)(D)) is amended by striking ``$1,750'' and inserting 
``$4,200''.
    (b) Income Protection Allowance for Certain Independent Students.--
Section 476(b)(1)(A)(iv) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087pp(b)(1)(A)(iv)) is amended--
            (1) in subclause (I), by striking ``$3,000'' and inserting 
        ``$6,000'';
            (2) in subclause (II), by striking ``$3,000'' and inserting 
        ``$6,000''; and
            (3) in subclause (III), by striking ``$6,000'' and 
        inserting ``$9,000''.
    (c) Consumer Price Index.--Section 478(b) of the Higher Education 
Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087rr) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``For each'' and 
        inserting ``(1) For each''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) For each academic year after academic year 1999-2000, the 
Secretary shall increase each of the dollar amounts contained in 
section 475(g)(2)(D) and subclauses (I), (II), and (III) of section 
476(b)(1)(A)(iv) by a percentage equal to the estimated percentage 
increase in the Consumer Price Index (as determined by the Secretary) 
between December 1998 and the December next preceding the beginning of 
such academic year, and rounding the result to the nearest $10.''.
                                 <all>
```
Minute Order Form (06/97)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Jud Sitting Judge if Other 4 ‘
" or Magistrate Judge Joan B. Gottschall semi Sudse Jan H. Levin
CASE NUMBER 03 C 7283 DATE 11/17/2004
CASE Saffold vs. Steadman
TITLE

{In the following box (a) indicate the party filing the motion, e.g., plaintiff, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the nature
of the motion being presented. ]

MOTION:

DOCKET ENTRY:

qd) Oo Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]

(2) oO Brief in support of motion due

6g) oO Answer brief to motion due___. Reply to answer brief due

(4) Oo Ruling/Hearingon_ se setfor_— at

(5) a Status hearing held.

(6) o Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for]on__—ssetfor at
(7) oO Trial[set for/re-set for] on __at

(8) oa [Bench/Jury trial} [Hearing] held/continuedto at

(9) Oo This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agreement/pursuant to]

OFRCP4(m) OLocal Rule 41.1 OO FRCP41(a)(1) OO FRCP41(a)(2).

ao) of {Other docket entry] All matters relating to the referral of 5/5/04 of this action having been
resolved, the case is returned to the assigned judge.

dal) oa [For further detail see order (on reverse side offattached to) the origigatyninute grder.], A

No notices required, advised in open court.  \

». Document
Number

No notices required,

Notices mailed by judge’s staff,

Notified counsel by telephone.

wv | Docketing to mail notices.

Mail AO 450 form.

v | Copy to judge/magistrate judge.

bisith
nov 18 2e04
ny
courtroom AiG date maited notice
SM deputy’s
initials

Date/time received in” ; -
central Clerk’s Office mailing deputy initials