alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Herman Roth, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Globus International
Resources Corp. for the three months ended December 31, 2003;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;and

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

5.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information;and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:March 9, 2004

/s/ HERMAN ROTH
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  Page 18 of 19
Opinion filed January 11, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-12-00281-CR

________

FORREST LEWIS HATLEY, IV, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 39th District Court

Haskell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 6570

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Forrest Lewis Hatley, IV has filed in this court a motion to dismiss his appeal. Pursuant 

to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2, the motion is signed by both appellant and his counsel.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

January 11, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1446

To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 7, 1997

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new item:

‘‘ 9902.32.32 Benzenesulfonic acid,

2-amino-5-nitro-,

monosodium salt

(CAS No. 30693–

53–9) (provided for

in subheading

2921.42.90.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2000 ’’.
2

•S 1446 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON

EMILY GARCIA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-00352-KI

JUDGMENT

George J. Wall

1336 E. Burnside St., Ste. 130

Portland, OR 97214

Attorney for Plaintiff

Billy J. Williams

United States Attorney

District of Oregon

Page 1 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:15-cv-00352-KI Document 18 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 2
Janice E. Hebert

Assistant United States Attorney

1000 SW Third Ave., Ste. 600

Portland, OR 97204-2902

Heather Griffith

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

701 Fifth Ave., Ste. 2900 M/S 221A

Seattle, WA 98104-7075

Attorneys for Defendant

KING, Judge:

Based on the record, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed. The case is remanded

for a finding of disability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 11th day of February, 2016. 

 /s/ Garr M. King 

Garr M. King

United States District Judge

Page 2 - JUDGMENT

Case 3:15-cv-00352-KI Document 18 Filed 02/11/16 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 CALCULATION OF THE MAXIMUM NOTES BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2005
UNDER THE SENIOR SECURED NOTES FACILITY DATED JANUARY 13, 2005
(dollars in thousands)
 I. Lesser of:A. the product of:1. the Free Cash Flow Multiple
    
    
    8.0xMultiplied by2. Services Business Free Cash Flow
    
    $
    7,980$
    63,840OrB. the product of:x. 2.0 times
    
    
    2.0xmultiplied byy. Services Business Revenue
    
    $
    21,583$
    43,166$
    43,166II. Lesser of1. 50% of the results of the immediately preceding clause (I)
    
    $
    21,5832. 30% of the Companys After-tax PV10
    
    $
    13,055$
    13,055III. 10% of the Companys After-tax PV10
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    4,352Maximum Notes Balance = (I) + (II) + (III)
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    60,573Aggregate Notes Outstanding at Determination Date
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    45,000Companys After-tax PV10 as of December 31, 2005
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    43,517Services Business Revenue {Section 2(a)(xxxx)}
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    21,583Services Business Free Cash Flow {Section 2(a)(xxxix)}Services Business operating income
    
    $
    6,712Services Business depreciation and amortization expense
    
    
    1,268Less: Any net operating income from affiliates
    
    
    (A) Services Business net operating income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    7,980(B) Aggregate interest paid on permitted indebtedness
    
    
    
    
    
    
    25Services Business capital expenditures
    
    $
    4,235Less: Service Business equipment sales procces
    
    
    (31
    )Less: Issuances of stock by Infinity, less costs
    
    
    (4,707
    )Less: Aggregate interest expense
    
    
    (25
    )Services Business capital expenditures, not funded
    
    
    (25
    )
    
    
    (25
    )$
    7,980
# C_2019263EN.01005602.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/56

---

Action brought on 6 June 2019 — Chypre v EUIPO — Filotas Bellas & Yios (Halloumi Vermion grill cheese M BELAS PREMIUM GREEK DAIRY SINCE 1927)

(Case T-351/19)

(2019/C 263/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, S. Baran, Barrister and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Filotas Bellas & Yios AE (Alexandreia Imathias, Greece)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Halloumi χαλλούμι Vermion grill cheese M BELAS PREMIUM GREEK DAIRY SINCE 1927 — Application for registration No 12 172 276

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 April 2019 in Case R 2297/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and pay those of the Applicant for Annulment. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and pay those of the Applicant for Annulment.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, RichardJ. Campo, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the CamdenSummit Partnership, L.P. (the “Partnership”), and Dennis M. Steen, the SeniorVice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of thePartnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Partnership for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   | /s/ Richard J.  Campo                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard J. Campo                                        |
|   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |                                                    |
|   |                                                    |
|   | /s/ Dennis M.  Steen                                    |
|   | Dennis M. Steen                                         |
|   | Senior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial  Officer |
|   | and Secretary                                           |

 

May 16, 2005

 

----
#### Raymond Armstrong, Appellant, v B.R. Fries & Associates, Inc., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[945 NYS2d 74]-

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered October 26, 2011, which denied plaintiff’s motion to vacate dismissal of the action and restore it to the calendar, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, the dismissal vacated, and the matter restored to the active calendar. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered October 15, 2010, which sua sponte directed dismissal of the complaint unless plaintiff filed a note of issue on October 20, 2010, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Plaintiffs motion to vacate the order of dismissal should have been granted since, whether the dismissal was pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (3) or CPLR 3126, it did not comply with statu*698tory requirements. The case was marked dismissed after plaintiff failed to comply with a status conference order directing him to serve and file a note of issue within seven days. That order did not comply with the requirements of CPLR 3216 (b) in that plaintiff was not given 90 days to file a note of issue, and the order did not contain a statement that, inter alia, a “default by the party upon whom such notice is served in complying with such demand within said ninety day period will serve as a basis for a motion by the party serving said demand for dismissal as against him for unreasonably neglecting to proceed” (CPLR 3216 [b] [3]; *see Cadichon v Facelle,*18 NY3d 230, 235 [2011]). Since there was no motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (3), or notice to plaintiff, the case could not be dismissed for failure to prosecute *(see Cadichon*at 235).

Nor was dismissal proper as a discovery sanction pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3), since there was no finding of “willful and contumacious” conduct on plaintiffs part justifying dismissal of the complaint *(see Jones v Green,*34 AD3d 260, 261 [2006]). Moreover, the extreme penalty of dismissal should not be imposed in the absence of any prior notice to plaintiff that such a sanction might be imminent *(see Postel v New York Univ. Hosp.,*262 AD2d 40, 42 [1999]). We note that plaintiff’s adversaries did not move for such relief and did not oppose the motion to vacate or this appeal.

The status conference order itself is not appealable as of right because it is not an order which determined a motion made upon notice *(see Postel*at 41). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Polymer Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR HomepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Plant Polymer Research People





Gary D Grose    Physical Science Technician **Biography and Research** Gary Grose has been a Physical Science Technician at NCAUR, USDA-ARS, Peoria, IL since 1989. Gary received his B.S. and M.S. in Chemistry and Mathematics from Bradley University with an emphasis on Computational Chemistry and Instrumental Analysis. Gary works with Dr. Mila Hojilla-Evangelista and a team of scientists conducting research on the development of novel, marketable products utilizing current and new co-products from the industrial processing of agricultural crops, primarily the proteins in pennycress, camelina, soybean, cottonseed or corn. The goals of this research are to devise practical ways to extract and recover the proteins, determine their properties, and evaluate their suitability for various uses, such as films, fibers, thickeners, emulsifiers, or adhesives. These industrially useful, higher value products generated by this research will reduce dependence on non-renewable materials, provide an additional revenue stream to growers and processors, and benefit a large segment of our economy.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99.19


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eurotech Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randolph A. Graves,
Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Randolph A. Graves, Jr.
----------------------------
Randolph A. Graves, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
November 19, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of OmniComm
Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                            
|Cornelis F. Wit                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director



November 12, 2004
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research: Columbia, MO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ARS Oppportunities
                        ARS OpportunitiesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Columbia, Missouri Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research People & Locations







Kurtis W Holiman

(Kurt)
                        Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research

                        




                        
                        Engineering Technician
                        Phone: (573) 882-1114
                        
                        
                        Fax: (573) 882-1146(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Cooke, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 798]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Sullivan, J.), rendered June 30, 2009, convicting him of arson in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the *1138defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Angiolillo, J.P., Belen, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.