alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005256EN.01001501.xml

| 15.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/15

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2005/C 256/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

SPAIN

Change of name of license holder

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| New name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cygnus Air SA — Corporación Ygnus Air SA | | passengers, mail, cargo | 8.3.2005 |

New name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Cygnus Air SA — Corporación Ygnus Air SA

passengers, mail, cargo

8.3.2005

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gary Rodney, certify that:



1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Catalina Lighting, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: January 28, 2005 |  | /s/    GARY RODNEY     
|                       |  | Gary Rodney            
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CEO Certification
 
 I, Steve Westlund, certify that:
 
 The undersigned certifies that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Kaire Holdings, Incorporated. (the "Company");
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 Date: April 13, 2004
 
 /s/ Steve Westlund
 Steve Westlund, Chief Executive Officer,
 President, Chief Accounting Officer and Director
# Official Journal C 196/11 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 196 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4811 August 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 196

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4811 August 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 196/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 196/2 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3754 — Strabag/Dywidag) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2005/C 196/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3779 — Pernod Ricard/Allied Domecq) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2005/C 196/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3850 — G+J/Styria Medien/JV) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2005/C 196/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2970 — GE/ABB Structured Finance) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2005/C 196/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3830 — Goldman Sachs/Treofan) (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2005/C 196/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3857 — SITA/Flughafen Düsseldorf/FDITG) (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2005/C 196/8 | Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 1(2) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement on State aid regarding the Norwegian Energy Fund (Case 57473, former 47756) | 5 |
| 2005/C 196/9 | EFTA Surveillance Authority inquiry in the retail banking and business insurance sector | 32 |
| 2005/C 196/10 | EFTA Surveillance Authority inquiry in the electricity sector | 32 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 196/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 196/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3754 — Strabag/Dywidag) (
  1
  )

1

2

2005/C 196/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3779 — Pernod Ricard/Allied Domecq) (
  1
  )

1

2

2005/C 196/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3850 — G+J/Styria Medien/JV) (
  1
  )

1

3

2005/C 196/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2970 — GE/ABB Structured Finance) (
  1
  )

1

3

2005/C 196/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3830 — Goldman Sachs/Treofan) (
  1
  )

1

4

2005/C 196/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3857 — SITA/Flughafen Düsseldorf/FDITG) (
  1
  )

1

4

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2005/C 196/8

Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 1(2) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement on State aid regarding the Norwegian Energy Fund (Case 57473, former 47756)

5

2005/C 196/9

EFTA Surveillance Authority inquiry in the retail banking and business insurance sector

32

2005/C 196/10

EFTA Surveillance Authority inquiry in the electricity sector

32

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PIMCO
ADVISORS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          41,311
<SECURITIES>                                    11,521
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,062
<PP&E>                                          10,561 <F1> 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,980  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       306,777 <F2>  
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,534) <F3> 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,500
<SALES>                                              0 <F4> 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,024 <F5> 
<CGS>                                                0 <F4> 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,141 <F6> 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,009 <F7> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 92,329
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             91,128
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    91,128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.29 <F8> 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05 <F9> 
        
<FN> 
<F1>    Net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.
<F2>    Entity is a partnership. Amount shown represents Partners' Capital.
<F3>    Amount shown comprises Unamortized Compensation.
<F4>    The partnership is in the service business and has no sales or cost of 
        goods sold of tangible products.
<F5>    Amount shown comprises revenues from services. 
<F6>    Amount shown comprises costs of services.
<F7>    Amount shown is from amortization of intangible assets.
<F8>    Amount shown is for the Partnership's General Partner and Class A
        Limited Partner Units.
<F9>    Amount is for the Partnership's Class B Limited Partner Units. 
</FN> 

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil Dynamics Research: Auburn, AL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ARS in Auburn
                        Auburn Location
                                    Aquatic Animal Health Research
                    YouTube Videos!Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Auburn, Alabama Soil Dynamics Research People & Locations







Barry G Dorman
                        Soil Dynamics Research

                        




                        
                        Facility Operations Specialist
                        Phone: (334) 844-4741
                         ext. 2705
                        
                        Fax: (334) 844-4740(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)
                    ARS News Articles
                            item
                                                Elevated Carbon Dioxide Has Uneven Influence on Longleaf Communities


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of OmniComm
Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald T. Linares                     
|Ronald T. Linares                         
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



May 19, 2005
**Exhibit 12.1**
****
********
****
****
******Summit Properties Partnership, L.P.**
****
******Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**
****
******Three Months Ended March 31, 2004**Net Income

$ 3,751Interest:Expense incurred

6,978Amortization of deferred financing costs

327Rental fixed charges

23Total

$ 11,079Fixed charges:Interest expense

$ 6,978Interest capitalized

2,572Dividends to preferred unitholders in operating parthership

1,203Rental fixed charges

23Amortization of deferred financing costs

327Total

$ 11,103Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

1.00
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Colleen B. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 9, 2010



/s/ Colleen B. BrownColleen B. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

SHORB, et al, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LANE INDIVIDUAL PRACTICE 

ASSOCIATION (LIPA), et al, 

Defendants. 

MCSHANE, Judge: 

Civ. No. 6:14-cv-1889-TC 

OPINION and ORDERMagistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) 

and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 

Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. 

Bernhardt, 840 F .2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude it is correct. 

1 -OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 6:14-cv-01889-TC Document 33 Filed 05/14/15 Page 1 of 2
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and 

Recommendation (ECF No. 29) is adopted in its entirety. Defendant Oregon Health Authority's 

Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22), is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 14th day of May, 2015. 

2- OPINION AND ORDER 

\ l 

Michael J. McShane 

United States District Judge 

Case 6:14-cv-01889-TC Document 33 Filed 05/14/15 Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 22-40449 

____________ 

Cornel Jackie Drummer, 

Plaintiff—Appellant, 

versus

Ken Maynard, III; Aaron Mohantly; Dr. Hague, Medical 

Doctor; University of Texas Medical Branch Medical 

Staff, George Beto Unit, 

Defendants—Appellees. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:19-CV-387 

______________________________ 

Before Elrod, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Cornel Jackie Drummer, Texas prisoner # 00619316, appeals from the 

dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous and for failure to state a claim 

on which relief may be granted. Drummer filed the action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 to complain of alleged deliberate indifference to his serious 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

May 22, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-40449 Document: 00516758447 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/22/2023
No. 22-40449 

2 

medical needs. Currently pending before this court are several motions filed 

by Drummer. 

Because Drummer has not shown exceptional circumstances, his 

motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 

691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir. 1982). Drummer recently paid the appellate 

filing fee, and therefore his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on 

appeal is DENIED as moot. Drummer’s two motions for judicial notice are 

also DENIED. 

An appeal should be dismissed upon the hearing of any interlocutory 

motion where “it appears to the court that the appeal is frivolous and entirely 

without merit.” 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Our thorough examination of 

Drummer’s brief and the record reveals no nonfrivolous issue. The brief 

raises only one concrete argument. Contrary to Drummer’s contention, the 

district court did not err by dismissing his civil action sua sponte without 

ordering a response from the defendants. See Green v. McKaskle, 788 F.2d 

1116, 1119 (5th Cir. 1986); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Because 

Drummer’s appeal is frivolous and without any arguable merit, it is 

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

The district court’s dismissal counts as one strike under § 1915(g), 

and Drummer incurs an additional strike for this frivolous appeal. See 

Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996), abrogated in part on 

other grounds by Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 537 (2015). Drummer is 

WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he will no longer be allowed 

to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is 

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of 

serious bodily injury. See § 1915(g). 

Case: 22-40449 Document: 00516758447 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/22/2023