alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE DSI TOYS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED APRIL 30,1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         727,309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,937,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (119,284)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,324,405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,725,784
<PP&E>                                       4,364,741
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,939,543)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,190,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,286,943
<BONDS>                                     16,818,107
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,190
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,944,807)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,190,433
<SALES>                                      7,427,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,427,707
<CGS>                                        4,703,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,017,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               119,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,234
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (576,946)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (750,895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (270,322)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (480,573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (480,573)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 158 (Thursday, August 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46702-46703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17817]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank

[[Page 46703]]

Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than September 3, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. Daniel Otten, Hayward, Minnesota; to retain voting shares of 
Minnesota Community Bancshares, Inc., Albert Lea, Minnesota, and 
thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Arcadian Bank, Hartland, 
Minnesota.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Kathleen Sullivan, Cedar Rapids, Nebraska; to join the Sullivan 
Family Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of 
Cedar Rapids State Company, and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Cedar Rapids State Bank, both of Cedar Rapids, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 16, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-17817 Filed 8-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Christine Diliberto, Appellant, v Corene Barberich, Respondent.

[941 NYS2d 884]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J.), dated October 17, 2011, which denied her cross motion for summary judgment, in effect, on the issue of li*804ability, and dismissing the fifth affirmative defense alleging the lack of a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the plaintiff’s cross motion which was for summary judgment, in effect, on the issue of liability, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff established her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability *(see Franklin v 2 Guys From Long Pond, Inc.,*50 AD3d 846, 847 [2008]; *Gregson v Terry,*35 AD3d 358, 361 [2006]; *Russo v Sabella Bus Co.,*275 AD2d 660 [2000]). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to her liability *(Russo v Sabella Bus Co.,*275 AD2d at 660-661). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was for summary judgment, in effect, on the issue of liability.

The plaintiff, however, failed to establish her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the fifth affirmative defense, which alleged that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident. While the plaintiff submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that she had a fractured rib, which constitutes a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Bebry v Farkas-Galindez,*276 AD2d 656 [2000]), she failed to establish, prima facie, that the injury was causally related to the subject accident *(see Kapeleris v Riordan,*89 AD3d 903, 904 [2011]; *Elshaarawy v U-Haul Co. of Miss.,*72 AD3d 878, 881 [2010]; *Dabbs v Kelly,*245 AD2d 482, 482-483 [1997]). Accordingly, since the plaintiff failed to meet her prima facie burden, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff’s cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the fifth affirmative defense, without considering the sufficiency of the defendant’s opposition papers *(see Altamura v OneBeacon Ins. Group,*68 AD 3d 792 [2009]; *see generally Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Polymer Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR HomepageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Plant Polymer Research People





Gary M Kuzniar    Physical Science Technician **Biography and Research** Gary Kuzniar has been a Physical Science Technician at NCAUR, USDA-ARS, Peoria, IL since 1983. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Technology from Bradley University and his B.S. in Biology with a minor in Chemistry from Western Illinois University. Gary was a member of a team of scientists conducting research on the development of processing methods for non-fat food supplements and the processing of biological materials for recyclable products. Gary currently works with Dr. Atanu Biswas and a team of scientists to conduct research focused on polymer membrane process development for water treatment and product recovery fermentation broths.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Infinity, Inc., a Colorado
corporation (the Issuer), hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the Annual
Report) of the Issuer for the year ended December 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. §78 m(a)) and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. /s/ Stanton E. RossStanton E. RossPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 29, 2005
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-30459

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Rahsaan Johnson, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CR-135-3 

ON REMAND FROM

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Rahsaan Johnson appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for 

a sentence reduction pursuant to section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, 

Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We previously affirmed the 

district court’s denial of the motion. United States v. Johnson, No. 21-30459, 

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 24, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-30459 Document: 00516687814 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2023
No. 21-30459

2

2022 WL 1617863 (5th Cir. May 23, 2022). However, the Supreme Court 

vacated our judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of 

its decision in Concepcion v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2389 (2022).

On remand, the parties jointly ask us to vacate the district court order 

denying Johnson’s motion for a sentence reduction and remand the case to 

the district court in light of Concepcion. We grant the parties’ request. The 

district court’s order denying Johnson’s motion for a sentence reduction is 

VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for 

reconsideration in light of Concepcion.1

1 We do not mean to suggest what rulings the district court should issue on remand.

Case: 21-30459 Document: 00516687814 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2023
Order entered November 30 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00780

- CV

NYLONDAJAZZ SHARNESE , Appellant

V.

ULTIMA REAL ESTATE, INC., A TEXAS COMPAN Y, ET AL., Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 003

- 00174

- 2014



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 12, 2015 motion to order the court reporter to

file the reporter’s record. On November 17, 2015, we granted the court reporter’s motion for an

ex tension of time to December 14, 2015 to file the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we DENY
appellant’s motion as moot.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
(55 Misc. Rep. 133.)

#### MAHR v. LIVINGSTONE.

(Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County.

June, 1907.)

Replevin—When Maintainable.

Plaintiff, in actual possession of personalty, cannot maintain replevin therefor.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 42, Replevin, § 81.]

Action by Caroline S. Mahr against William H. Livingstone. Judgment for defendant.

A. Thain, for plaintiff.

Wesselman & Kraus, for defendant.

GREENBAUM, J.

Replevin is essentially a possessory action, and it is requisite for the maintenance thereof that the defendant should be in possession or control of the chattels sued for at the time the action is commenced, except where the same have been wrongfully disposed of. Sinnott v. Feiock, 165 N. Y. 444, 59 N. E. 265, 80 Am. St. Rep. 776; Wheeler v. Allen, 51 N. Y. 37, 42; Christie v. Corbett, 34 How. Pr. 19; Alaske Untersteutzung Verein v. Wall, 28 Misc. Rep. 174, 58 N. Y. Supp. 1115. It is undisputed that at the time that this action was commenced the chattel sought to be recovered was not in the possession or control of defendant, but, on the contrary, that the same was in the actual possession of plaintiff. Under these circumstances the complaint must be dismissed upon the merits.

Complaint dismissed upon the merits.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Horticultural Crops Disease and Pest Management Research Unit: Corvallis, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Corvallis, Oregon Horticultural Crops Disease and Pest Management Research Unit People & Locations







Brandon  Fahlenkamp
                        Horticultural Crops Disease and Pest Management Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid
                        Phone: (541) 738-4051
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         592,547                 739,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  344,868                  67,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               937,415                 807,034
<PP&E>                                       3,824,721               2,463,887
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,027,307)               (591,576)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,734,829               2,679,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,488                 285,697
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        35,900                  35,900
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,698,929               2,357,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,734,829               2,679,345
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,995,243               2,644,147
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,359,822               1,634,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,635,421               1,009,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                   571,958                 286,165
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,063,463                 723,306
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
#### COHEN v. MOSHKOWITZ.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 31, 1896.)

No opinion. Amended return ordered as per order filed. See 39 N. Y. Supp. 1084.
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
      undersigned officer of RC2 Corporation (the "Company") certifies that the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




Dated:
      August 8,
      2008


/s/
      Curtis W.
      Stoelting


Curtis
      W. Stoelting


Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive


Officer
      and Principal Financial Officer)







This
      certification is made solely for
      purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained
      therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Janice Rogers, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford, 71*AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.—criminal possession of stolen property, second degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
Opinion filed January 11 , 201 3



## In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 12

- 00281

- C R

________

FORREST LEWIS HATLEY, IV

, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 39 th District Court

Haskell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 6570

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Forrest Lewis Hatley, IV has filed in th is court a motion to dismiss his appeal. Pursuant

to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2, the motion is signed by both appellant and his counsel.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

January 11 , 2013

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.