alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 159 (Friday, August 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 46822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17601]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No.: 210804-0158]


Public Availability of Department of Commerce FY 2019 Service 
Contract Inventory Data

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, the Department of Commerce 
(DOC) is publishing this notice to advise the public of the 
availability of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 Service Contract Inventory 
data, a report that analyzes DOC's FY 2018 Service Contract Inventory 
and a plan for the analysis of FY 2019 Service Contract Inventory.

ADDRESSES: The Department of Commerce's FY 2019 Service Contract 
Inventory is included in the government-wide inventory available at: 
https://www.acquisition.gov/service-contract-inventory, which can be 
filtered to display the FY 2019 inventory for each agency. In addition 
to the link to access DOC's FY 2019 service contract inventory, the FY 
2018 Analysis Report and Plan for analyzing the FY 2019 data is on the 
Office of Acquisition Management homepage at the following link https://www.commerce.gov/oam/resources/service-contract-inventory. OFPP's 
guidance memo on service contract inventories is available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Virna Winters, Director for 
Acquisition Policy and Oversight Division at 202-482-4248 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a1c1d03041e0f18192a0e0509440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7305041a1d0716010033171c105d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The service contract inventory provides 
information on service contract actions over $150,000 made in FY 2019. 
The information is organized by function to show how contracted 
resources are distributed throughout the agency. The inventory has been 
developed in accordance with guidance on service contract inventories 
issued on November 5, 2010, by the Office of Management and Budget's 
Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP).

Barry E. Berkowitz,
Senior Procurement Executive and Director, Office of Acquisition 
Management.
[FR Doc. 2021-17601 Filed 8-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-17-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Germplasm Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Crop Germplasm Research People & Locations







Toni  Cox
                        Crop Germplasm Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician
                        Phone: (325) 646-0593
                        
                        
                        Fax: (325) 643-4118(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### ELKAU et al., Appellants, v. HITCHCOCK et al., Respondents.

(Superior Court of Buffalo,

General Term.

July, 1895.)

Action by Nathan Elkau and others against Charles R. Hitchcock and others.

No opinion. Judgment of the municipal court set aside, with $10 costs and disbursements, and new trial ordered in the municipal court August 19, 1895, at 10 o’clock a. m. WHITE, J., dissents.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

RANDY RITMILLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL SPICER; SPIRIT

ENTERPRISES OF OREGON, INC.,

an Oregon corporation,

Defendants..

3:14-CV-02011-BR

 

JUDGMENT OF REMAND

 

Based on the Court's Order issued January 12, 2015, this

matter is REMANDED to Multnomah County Circuit Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 12th day of January, 2015.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

1 - JUDGMENT OF REMAND

Case 3:14-cv-02011-BR Document 20 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MUSIEHAILE Case No. 3:14-cv-01996-HZ 

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Based upon the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and Plaintiffs 

EAJA petition, it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $7039.72 shall be awarded to 

Plaintiff, unless there is an allowable offset under the Department of the Treasury's Offset 

Program. SeeAstrue v. Ratlif 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). There are no costs or expenses. 

If it is determined that Plaintiffs EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the 

Department of the Treasury's Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees shall be made 

payable to Plaintiff's attorney, Martin R. Cohen, based upon Plaintiffs assignment of these 

amounts to Plaintiffs attorney. 

Any check for EAJA fees should be mailed to Plaintiff's attorney as follows: 

Martin R. Cohen 

Attorney at Law 

PO Box 1229 

Lake Oswego, OR 97035 

DATED this _/J;_ day of May, 2016. 

Case 3:14-cv-01996-HZ Document 24 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 2
Presented by: 

Isl Linda Ziskin --

LINDA ZISKIN, OSB # 011067 

(503) 889-0472 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 3:14-cv-01996-HZ Document 24 Filed 05/06/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert Varakian, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Catalina Lighting, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: January 13, 2005 |  | /s/    ROBERT VARAKIAN               
|                       |  | Robert Varakian                      
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael W. Brennan, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of First Industrial,
L.P.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and to the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: November 5, 2004 /s/ Michael W. BrennanMichael W. BrennanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerFirst Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALBERT STAFFORD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D13-1532

[December 5, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lynn Rosenthal, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-18389 CF10B.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. 

Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

We initially issued an opinion in this case reversing the trial court’s 

order denying Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief and remanding

for resentencing pursuant to Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016).

We cited our opinion in Michel v. State, 204 So. 3d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) 

and certified conflict with Stallings v. State, 198 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 

2016) and Williams v. State, 198 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). 

Thereafter, we granted a stay of mandate pending the disposition of the 

conflict. The Florida Supreme Court subsequently quashed our opinion 

in Michel. See State v. Michel, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S298 (Fla. July 12, 2018). 

Appellant has now filed a motion to lift the stay of mandate and reinstate 

our opinion following the dictates of Atwell. In response, the State 

requests that we withdraw our Michel opinion and affirm the trial court’s 

summary denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief.

We agree with the State and now lift our stay of mandate and withdraw

our prior opinion in the instant case. We affirm the trial court’s summary 
2

denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief pursuant to the 

supreme court’s opinion in Michel. See also Franklin v. State, 43 Fla. L. 

Weekly S556 (Fla. Nov. 8, 2018) (reaffirming that Atwell is no longer good 

law and that Franklin’s three 1,000-year concurrent sentences with the 

possibility of parole did not violate the Eighth Amendment of the United 

States Constitution or the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in 

Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010) and Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 

(2012)). 

Prior opinion withdrawn; affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Invasive Insect Biocontrol & Behavior Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Invasive Insect Biocontrol & Behavior Laboratory People & Locations







Monica  Fair
                        Invasive Insect Biocontrol & Behavior Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (301) 504-5689
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1600

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive in the case of

multiemployer plans the section 415 limit on benefits to the participant’s

average compensation for his high 3 years.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 3, 1998

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive

in the case of multiemployer plans the section 415 limit

on benefits to the participant’s average compensation

for his high 3 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS

4 UNDER SECTION 415 LIMIT ON BENEFITS.

5 Paragraph (11) of section 415(b) of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to special limitation rule for

7 governmental plans) is amended—
2

•S 1600 IS

1 (1) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘AND MULTI2 EMPLOYER PLANS’’ after ‘‘GOVERNMENTAL PLANS’’;

3 and

4 (2) by inserting ‘‘or a multiemployer plan (as

5 defined in section 414(f))’’ after ‘‘governmental plan

6 (as defined in section 414(d))’’.

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to

9 plan years beginning after December 31, 1997.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

GEOFFREY SCHNEIDER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner 

of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

JUDGMENT 

Civil No.3:14-cv-00892-AA 

Pursuant to the ORDER signed on May 27, 2015, this action is remanded 

for further administrative proceedings consistent with that ORDER. 

Dated this I r day of August 2015. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

JUDGMENT 

Case 3:14-cv-00892-AA Document 28 Filed 08/18/15 Page 1 of 1
MICHELLE WAITS, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CAROLYN COLVIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

3:14-CV-02010-AC 

ORDER 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of$4927.92 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree that attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiffs attorney, dependent 

upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, 

pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed inAstrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiffs attorney and 

mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, 

OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. 

71/i ,-;' DA TED this LL day of c:/:e 

John V. iAcosta 

Unitectjtates Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:14-cv-02010-AC Document 32 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

WILLIAM CRAIG MACDONALD, 

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:14-cv-1632-TC 

v. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

MICHAEL C. FEBRES, et al., 

Defendants. 

MCSHANE, Judge: 

On October 15, 2014, pro se plaintiff, William Macdonald, filed this action against numerous parties 

alleging retaliation stemming from his complaints about problems with rental properties. On October 17, 

2014, after granting in forma pauperis status, the court dismissed plaintiffs complaint for failure to adequately 

allege any claims. The court allowed plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies and 

warned plaintiff that a failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. To date, plaintiff has failed to 

respond with an amended complaint. Accordingly, this action is dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to 

follow a court order. 

CONCLUSION 

This act~on is dismissed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 'Z.<i day ofNovember 2014. 

1 -OPINION AND ORDER 

\ <------

Michael J. McShane 

United States District Judge 

Case 6:14-cv-01632-TC Document 8 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 1