alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1235 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 309
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1235

                          [Report No. 105-163]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
 coastwise trade for the vessel registered as State of Oregon official 
                           number OR 766 YE.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 1997

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

                           February 12, 1998

              Reported by Mr. McCain, without an amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
 coastwise trade for the vessel registered as State of Oregon official 
                           number OR 766 YE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), 
section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 
U.S.C. App. 289), section 12102 and section 12106 of title 46, United 
States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
coastwise trade for the vessel registered as State of Oregon official 
number OR 766 YE.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 309

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1235

                          [Report No. 105-163]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
 coastwise trade for the vessel registered as State of Oregon official 
                           number OR 766 YE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 12, 1998

                       Reported without amendment`
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-1047 (Third Review)]

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on ironing tables and certain parts thereof from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted this review on February 1, 2021 (86 FR 7737) and determined on May 7, 2021 that it would conduct an expedited review (86 FR 36771, July 13, 2021).

                    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on August 13, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5221 (August 2021), entitled                     *Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1047 (Third Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: August 13, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-17741 Filed 8-17-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MEDFORD DIVISION 

CHRISTOPHER DEARMON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC., 

Defendant. 

PANNER, District Judge:' 

No. 1:14-cv-1375-CL 

ORDER 

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and 

Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no 

objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de 

novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 

(8th Cir. 1983). 

After reviewing the file, I agree with Magistrate Judge 

Clarke that Plaintiff's second and third claims must be dismissed 

1 - ORDER 

Case 1:14-cv-01375-CL Document 16 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 2
with prejudice. Accordingly, I adopt the Report and 

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke. 

CONCLUSION 

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#10) is 

adopted. Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second and 

third claims for failure to state a claim (#5) is granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this /V day of November, 2 014. 

OWEN M. PANNER 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

2 - ORDER 

Case 1:14-cv-01375-CL Document 16 Filed 11/12/14 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 CEO
Certification
 
 I, Steve
Westlund, certify that:
 
 The
undersigned certifies that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10KSB of Kaire Holdings, Incorporated. (the
"Company");
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; and
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
 
 4. The
Company's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The
Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
June 1, 2005
 
 /s/ Steve
Westlund
 Steve
Westlund, Chief Executive Officer,
 President,
Chief Accounting Officer and Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6905

JASON VANN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BARBARA MEAD, Medical Staff Supervisor,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00274-RAJ-RJK)

Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 27, 2017

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Jason Vann, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & 

FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Jason Vann seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for 

appointment of counsel. Barbara Mead has moved to dismiss the appeal. This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen 

v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Vann seeks to 

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we grant Mead’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 10(a)    
    


        [Sutherland
Asbill and Brennan LLP Letterhead] 


November 24,
2008 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company

2801 Highway 201 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors: 


        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of Post-Effective Amendment
Number 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-146508) filed by Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company and Variable Annuity
Account A of Protective Life with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under
Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 



						
	 
	 	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 	  SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

	 
	 	 	

By:	 	 /s/ Stephen E. Roth







  Stephen E. Roth
















						









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10(a)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leon Marks, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to sever defendant’s trial from that of his codefendant. Defendant’s motion was untimely (CPL 255.20, 200.40 [1]) and his showing insufficient. Upon review of the record, we find that there was no impairment of substantial rights unseen before trial *(see, People v Fisher,*249 NY 419, 427). The alleged errors in jury instructions were not preserved and we do not find that defendant was deprived of a fair trial *(see,*
      *978CPL 470.15 [6] [a]; *People v Robinson,*36 NY2d 224, 228, *rearg denied*37 NY2d 786; *People v Fragale,*60 AD2d 972). There was sufficient evidence from which the jury could find that defendant, with intent to kill, shot the victim at least once, causing a wound which contributed to his death *(see, People v Cicchetti,*44 NY2d 803, 804-805). Defendant’s sentence was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Stiller, J. — murder, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
(15 Misc. Rep. 20.)

#### PEOPLE ex rel. EDWARDS v. TAPPAN et al., Commissioners of Park Department.

(Superior Court of New York City,

General Term.

December 18, 1895.)

1. Policemen—Dismissal.

The dismissal of a park policeman for leaving his post will be confirmed, though he may have had a valid excuse therefor, if he failed to temporarily resign his duty to another member of the force, as required by a rule of the department, and gives no explanation of his neglect.

*2.*Same—Review of Decision of Police Board.

Where there is sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction of a policeman charged with leaving his post, the action of the police board in dismissing him will not be reversed solely because the punishment was, in the judgment of the court, too severe.

Certiorari by George Edwards to review the action of Abraham Tappan and others, constituting the board of park commissioners of the city of New York, in removing relator from the park police force after trial on a charge of having been off post.

Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, McADAM, and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.

Louis J. Grant, for relator.

Francis M. Scott (Terence Farley, of counsel), for respondents.

*774PER CURIAM.

The relator was duly tried and convicted upon a charge of having been off from his post, and thereupon dismissed from the police force of the park department. Upon his trial he admitted that, when found by his superior officer, he was four blocks away from his post, but claimed that he had left his post to attend a call of nature. There was some evidence which. cast doubt upon the sincerity of the claim, but, assuming the truth of the relator’s statement, he was still guilty of a violation of the rule of the department, which in such a case made it his duty to call on, and temporarily resign his duty to, some other member of the force. No excuse or explanation was given by him why he had not complied with the rule in this particular. The conviction therefore rests upon sufficient evidence, and, that being so, we cannot reverse the proceeding for the sole reason that in our judgment a less severe punishment should have been inflicted. The determination of the board of commissioners must be confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agroecosystem Management Research: Lincoln, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lincoln, Nebraska Agroecosystem Management Research People & Locations







Hannah J Spiehs
                        Agroecosystem Management Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid
                        Phone: (402) 469-3478
                        
                        
                        Fax: (402) 472-4020(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1541

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic

acid, 2-[[1-[[(2,3-di-hydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)amino carbonyl]-2-

oxopropyl]azo]-,dimethyl ester.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on 1,4-

Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 2-[[1-[[(2,3-di-hydro-2-oxo-1Hbenzimidazol-5-yl)amino carbonyl]-2-oxopropyl]azo]-, dimethyl ester.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1541 IS

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1,4-

2 BENZENEDICARBOXYLIC ACID, 2-[[1-[[(2,3-DI3 HYDRO-2-OXO-1H-BENZIMIDAZOL-5-YL)AMINO

4 CARBONYL]-2-OXOPROPYL]AZO]-,DIMETHYL

5 ESTER.

6 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar7 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

8 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:

‘‘ 9902.32.XX 1,4-

Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 2-[[1-

[[(2,3-di-hydro-2-

oxo-1Hbenzimidazol-5-

yl)amino carbonyl]-

2-oxopropyl]azo]-,

dimethyl ester provided for in subheading

3204.17.85 ........... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

10 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re11 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

12 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

13 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### HOOSICK RIVER PULP CO., Appellant, v. THOMPSON et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by the Hoosick River Pulp Company against David A. Thompson and another.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

(i) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|      |  |                |  | 
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | March 30, 2010 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ C. Kirk Peacock    
|      |  |                |  |  |  | Name:  |  | C. Kirk Peacock        
|      |  |                |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10



 

Exhibit 10.2

[SEARS HOLDINGS LETTERHEAD]


December 4, 2008

J. Miles Reidy

[Address]


Dear Miles, 

The purposes of this letter are to confirm your intent to resign from Sears Holdings Corporation effective as of January 31, 2009, and to confirm our agreement to additional changes to the June 25, 2008 update ("June Update") to your September 12, 2007 offer letter ("Original Offer Letter") (regarding repayment of your sign-on bonus) and to your Original Offer Letter (regarding repayment of your relocation benefits).  These latest changes have been approved by the Compensation Committee of SHC's Board of Directors.



These changes, to which the parties intend to be legally bound for good and valuable consideration, are as follows:

	With respect to your one-time sign-on bonus of $250,000 (gross), which amount was paid to you October 22, 2008, you will not be required to repay this amount if you do not voluntarily terminate your employment with SHC before January 31, 2009.
	With respect to the relocation benefits, which benefits were paid either directly to you or to a third party on your behalf under Sears Relocation Policy (payments totaled approximately $67,000 including tax gross-up), you will not be required to repay these amounts if you do not voluntarily terminate your employment with SHC before January 31, 2009.


In consideration for SHC's agreement to waive the right to these repayments, you agree to execute the attached General Release and Waiver.  Further, you understand that by voluntarily terminating your employment you are not entitled to severance-relate pay or benefits under your Executive Severance Agreement but you remain obligated to comply with this agreement, including the one (1) year non-compete and non-solicitation provisions and the non-disclosure provision.  

Your Original Offer Letter (as updated by the June Update and this letter), your September 7, 2007 Executive Severance Agreement (including Appendix A and the June 25, 2008 Addendum), the Restricted Stock Award Agreement (as amended June 25, 2008) and your General Release and Waiver, shall contain and comprise the entire understanding and agreement between you and Sears and shall fully supersede any and all prior agreements or understandings between you and Sears with respect to the subject matter contained herein. 

Please sign below and return this letter, and your executed General Release and Waiver, to my attention.



Sincerely,


/s/ William R. Harker

William R. Harker

Accepted:



/s/ J. Miles Reidy

J. Miles Reidy

12/5/2008

Date
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PEDRO V. SILVA

, Appellant,

v.

PENELOPE HERRERA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3729

[ May 3, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Dale C. Cohen , Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE17006549

.

Carla P. Lowry of Lowry At Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Christopher E. Ells, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, G ROSS and T AYLOR

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.