alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1460

For the relief of Alexandre Malofienko, Olga Matsko, and their son, Vladimir

Malofienko.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8, 1997

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Alexandre Malofienko, Olga Matsko, and

their son, Vladimir Malofienko.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Alexandre Malofienko, Olga Matsko, and

7 their son, Vladimir Malofienko, shall be held and consid8 ered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States

9 for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment

10 of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.
2

•S 1460 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to

3 Alexandre Malofienko, Olga Matsko, and their son, Vladi4 mir Malofienko, as provided in this Act, the Secretary of

5 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the ap6 propriate number during the current fiscal year the total

7 number of immigrant visas available to natives of the

8 country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the

9 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         277,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  907,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,917,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,356,445
<PP&E>                                       2,130,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,555,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,941,732
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,360,941
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,555,657
<SALES>                                     10,206,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,206,524
<CGS>                                        7,125,487
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,590,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (21,076)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                502,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (200,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            702,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   702,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of China Digital Media
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Daniel Ng, Chief Executive Officer, and Lui Chi Keung, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify that:
 
 * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
Daniel Ng
 ------------------------
 Daniel
Ng
 Director,
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 April 15,
2005
 
 /s/ Lui
Chi Keung
 ---------------------------------
 Daniel
Ng
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 April 15,
2005
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
^dKm ft (WtY^llV UiVtf _ ,

KW FHU^l ; • ___________

V^siucAM'w-Tftm

[ftU-C ft V LJ2ifvU(^7}l .ftflfr_-)_0? _i2<

9 t\ .___.____ CahA.) _A_foo

lEQJt

nfc.. n ua-oi _ tm j a«„,

IVao. r.^U^^ia^k ^^.cte*

i —

l\_ (x£ai>Q(u Sao. 4VJ£ l_44e& q? 'n_oh_\ft\i is TL __„U Ufe -Kn &_._. A\£

.fclwA hV Mk fac4vL ti_ftft„ (___4v- YlftUici _1_aXs _&l£. Afo

StoyV _^V _o_ .&__(V„\n omru^A^tk^A^oaHi^-^miE

_^^&AW

?/i)A IjooIV uj>UiA i_aS 4fe <o&nOE l_&4 ^ft_o_Jr\ (_2_k-Arm)

4 fx as,U life 4o fc^u> 'W* rt_ savL.tua 4W^4ujq t_oiK

fferfed

c^ dk_ [(ughupu cjr XxTK-l^-il^-Ql 7__*M; (10-07-\£ ft_6Vht£
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company,

Plaintiff,

v.

Jens Peel and Cindy Peel, husband and wife; 

Charles Johnson and Connie Johnson, 

husband and wife; 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-CV-00814 - ST

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) filed a Motion for 

Summary Judgment (docket #11) to which defendants did not file a response. Defendants 

Charles Johnson and Connie Johnson, through their attorney Calvin Vance, have informed the 

court that they will be withdrawing their tender for insurance coverage to State Farm. Defendants 

Jens Peel and Cindy Peel, through their attorney Scott Taylor, have stated that they are not 

opposing State Farm’s motion.

Therefore, State Farm’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket #11) is granted. State 

Farm has no duty to indemnify or defend Defendants Charles Johnson and Connie Johnson with 

respect to the claims alleged in the lawsuit filed by James Peel and Cindy Peel in the Circuit 

Court for Lane County, Case No. 13-23940. Since Defendants Charles Johnson and Connie 

1 – ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-00814-ST Document 19 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2
Johnson have withdrawn their tender, State Farm has no duty to defend or indemnify under the 

policy for this independent reason. 

Accordingly, this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. 

Dated this 14th day of November, 2014. 

s/ Janice M. Stewart_________________

Hon. Janice M. Stewart

United States Magistrate Judge

2 – ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-00814-ST Document 19 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

EDGAR T. NUMRICH,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF OREGON,

Defendant.

3:15-CV-00183-JE

 

ORDER 

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and

Recommendation (#17) on June 17, 2015, in which he recommends the

Court grant Defendant’s Motion (#8-1) to Dismiss, deny as moot

Defendant’s Motion (#8-2) for More Definite Statement, and

dismiss this matter with prejudice. Plaintiff filed timely

Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now

before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

1 - ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00183-JE Document 21 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 2
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make

a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's

report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561

F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

In his Objections Plaintiff reiterates the arguments

contained in his Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. This

Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and

concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and

Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks’s Findings and

Recommendation (#17), GRANTS Defendant’s Motion (#8-1) to

Dismiss, DENIES as moot Defendant’s Motion (#8-2) for More

Definite Statement, and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 31st day of August, 2015.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00183-JE Document 21 Filed 08/31/15 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Evelyn Negron, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 86]—

Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority, dated May 26, 2010, terminating petitioner’s public housing tenancy, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Emily Jane Goodman, JJ, entered January 7, 2011), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the findings that petitioner filed false affidavits of income from 2006, by failing to report her ownership of a second home in New Windsor, and that she allowed her son and his family to occupy the subject apartment without permission *(see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]). It is uncontested that the affidavits of income did not include petitioner’s conceded ownership of the separate property, and that petitioner never sought permission for her son and his family to reside in the subject apartment. Moreover, petitioner’s son and his wife admitted to an investigator that they were the only adults residing at the apartment. Although the son denied such admission at the hearing, he conceded that he and his wife and child stay at the apartment on days when his child is in school, which is five days per week. Documentary evidence also supported the finding that petitioner did not reside in the apartment, but in the New Windsor home.

The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness *(see generally Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]; *see Matter of Waterside Redevelopment Co. v Department of Hous. Preserv. & Dev. of City of N.Y., 270*AD2d 87, 88 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 765*560[2000]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Catterson, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
#### BODEKER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK STEAM CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Oourt, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 29, 1896.)

Action by Charles F. W. Bodeker against the New York Steam Company.

James W. Hawes, for appellant.

Charles Steele, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the same question as that considered in the case of Goldschmidt v. Same Defendant, 40 N. Y. Supp. 1143. The order appealed from must be affirmed, with $10 costs.
Exhibit 10.F


1991 MASTER STOCK COMPENSATION 

SECTION 2.05 - RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD 


          AWARD
AGREEMENT made this      day
of                                  by
and between Donaldson Company, Inc.
(“Donaldson”) and ________________, an employee of Donaldson (“Employee”).


          In
consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and for other good
and valuable consideration the parties hereto agree as follows:


          1.
Donaldson hereby grants to Employee ____________ shares of Common
Stock for no cash
consideration subject to the following restrictions (“Restricted Stock”):


          a.
This Award is granted
pursuant to the 1991 Master Stock Compensation Plan of Donaldson (the “Master
Plan”) and is subject to all of the terms and conditions of such plan. Employee
acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Master Plan.


          b.
Date
of grant shall
be                   (“Grant
Date”).


          c.
Restricted Stock may not be sold, assigned, hypothecated or transferred (including
without limitation, transfer by gift or donation) until the fifth anniversary
of the Grant Date (“Restriction Period”).


          d.
Shares
subject to the Restricted Stock Award shall be forfeited to Donaldson if, within
the Restriction Period employment of Employee by Donaldson terminates for any reason (including
without limitation termination by Donaldson, with or without cause) other than for reasons
of death,
normal retirement, long-term disability.


          e.
Upon
termination of Employee’s employment within the Restriction Period by reason of death, normal retirement or
long-term disability the restrictions hereinabove imposed
shall lapse for that number of shares
obtained by multiplying the Award by a fraction formed from










dividing
the full number of months of Employee’s employment since the Grant Date by sixty. The remainder of the shares
shall be forfeited to Donaldson.


          f.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary such restrictions shall lapse and all of the shares shall become
fully vested in the event of a Change in Control as provided in
the Master Plan.


          2.
Employee
shall have the right to vote the shares of Restricted Stock and receive cash
and stock dividends on such shares.


          3.
The
certificate(s) evidencing shares of Restricted Stock shall be held in custody by Donaldson (attention of
the Secretary) until the restrictions have
lapsed.


          4.
Donaldson and Employee recognize that this Agreement in no way restricts the right of
Donaldson to terminate Employee’s employment at any time.


          IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Donaldson and Employee have duly executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written.


	
 

	
 


	
DONALDSON
 COMPANY, INC.

	
EMPLOYEE


	
________________________________

	
________________________________


	
 

	
 


	
          Its_________________________________

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
P2035
# C_2006325EN.01002801.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/28

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the identification of controls, tell-tales and indicators for two- or three-wheel motor vehicles (Codified version)

COM(2006) 556 final — 2006/0175 (COD)

(2006/C 325/06)

On 19 October 2006, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

On 25 October 2006 the Committee Bureau instructed the Section for the Single Market, Production and Consumption to prepare the Committee's work on the subject.

Given the urgent nature of the work, the European Economic and Social Committee appointed Mr Simons as rapporteur-general at its 431st plenary session, held on 13 and 14 December 2006 (meeting of 13 December), and adopted the following opinion by 117 votes with one abstention.

1.   Conclusions and recommendations

| 1.1 | In a ‘people's Europe’, it is important that Community law should be both understandable and transparent. The European Parliament, Council and Commission have therefore also highlighted the need to codify legislative acts that have been frequently amended, and have agreed by interinstitutional agreement that an accelerated procedure may be used. Codification may not involve any substantive changes to the acts in question. |
| --- | --- |

1.1

In a ‘people's Europe’, it is important that Community law should be both understandable and transparent. The European Parliament, Council and Commission have therefore also highlighted the need to codify legislative acts that have been frequently amended, and have agreed by interinstitutional agreement that an accelerated procedure may be used. Codification may not involve any substantive changes to the acts in question.

| 1.2 | The Commission proposal under discussion here is fully consonant with the objective of codification and with the rules involved. The EESC therefore endorses it. |
| --- | --- |

1.2

The Commission proposal under discussion here is fully consonant with the objective of codification and with the rules involved. The EESC therefore endorses it.

Brussels, 13 December 2006.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,194
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    166,567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          28,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         59,831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,957
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   213,000
<SALES>                                        221,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               221,230
<CGS>                                          180,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  219,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                       293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,404
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,404
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Beltsville Agricultural Research Center: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center People & Locations







Emely  Schuck
                        Beltsville Agricultural Research Center

                        




                        
                        Secretary (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (301) 504-5592
                        
                        
                        Fax: (301) 504-5521(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1469 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1469

 To provide for the expansion of the historic community cemetery of El 
  Rito, New Mexico, through the special designation of five acres of 
            Carson National Forest adjacent to the cemetery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 1997

 Mr. Bingaman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the expansion of the historic community cemetery of El 
  Rito, New Mexico, through the special designation of five acres of 
            Carson National Forest adjacent to the cemetery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    (a) The village of El Rito, New Mexico (El Rito), is a small 
community of approximately 2,500 residents, completely surrounded by 
the Carson National Forest in New Mexico.
    (b) The historic community cemetery El Rito is adjacent to the 
lands of the Carson National Forest in New Mexico. After generations of 
use, there is no more available space left in the cemetery and the 
community members are required to get special permits to bury their 
deceased on Forest Service land.
    (c) The requirement for special use permits creates an undue 
bureaucratic requirement upon families within the El Rito community 
times when they are suffering from grief.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF LANDS.

    The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the United States 
Department of Agriculture Forest Service shall designate five acres of 
land in the Carson National Forest adjacent to the historic El Rito 
cemetery as special use land for use as cemetery land for members of 
the El Rito community to bury their deceased.
                                 <all>
```