alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Science Research: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Plant Science Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- Reprints
- ARS News Articles

Deborah A Samac

(Debby)
                     

                     Supervisory Research Geneticist (Plants)


                     Phone: (612) 625-1243
                     
                     

                     Fax: (612) 301-2130
                     

                     USDA-ARS, 495 BORLAUG HALL                        
                     1991 UPPER BUFORD CIRCLE                          
                     

                     SAINT PAUL                    , MN 55108-603


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

RESPONDET

v.

NICHOLAS ANTHONY ROBERTS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 241 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CHRISTOPH K. LaDUE and SHELLEY J.

LaDUE, co-administrators of the ESTATE 

of CHRISTOPH K. LaDUE, JR.,

Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 1:14-cv-01421-CL

v. ORDER

CITY OF TALENT, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 229), and 

the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although 

neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 

840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate 

Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 229) is adopted. Defendant Lindsey 

Nichole Painter’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 214) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 18th day of January, 2017.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________

Michael McShane

United States District Judge

Case 1:14-cv-01421-CL Document 235 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 1
<logo>Deloite & Touche LLP

Suite 2100
Telephone: (502)562-2000
220 West Main Street
Facsimile: (502) 562-2073
Louisville, Kentucky 40202-5313


				INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To the Stockholder of Great Financial Bank, FSB Louisville, Kentucky

We have examined management's assertion about Great 
Financial Bank, FSB's compliance with the minimum servicing 
standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of 
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage 
Bankers USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 
included in the accompanying management assertion report on 
compliance with minimum servicing standards. Management is 
responsible for Great Financial Bank, FSB's compliance with 
those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to 
express an opinion on management's assertion about the 
Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards 
established by the American Institute of Certified Public 
Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a text 
basis, evidence about Great Financial Bank, FSB's compliance 
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such 
other procedures as we considered necessary in the 
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a 
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not 
provide a legal determination on Great Financial Bank, FSB's 
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Great Financial 
Bank, FSB complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing 
standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 is 
fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 10, 1997
Exhibit 99.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globus International Resources Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Herman Roth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ HERMAN ROTH
-----------------------
Herman Roth
Chief Financial Officer
June 2, 2003


                                  Page 17 of 17
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 24 , 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00680

- CV

Vic A. Gardner, Appellant

v.

Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas; The State of Texas; and Glenn Elliott, Individually, Appellee s

APPEAL F ROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

c onsidered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal in the trial

court’s judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the opinion and

judgment dated July 18, 2013, are withdrawn, a nd this opinion and judgment are substituted in

their places; and that the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER

ordered that the appellant pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court

below; and t hat this decision be certified below for observance.
<PAGE>   1
CENCOM CALBE INCOME PARTNERS II, L.P.
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
(In Thousands, Except Ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Earnings                                1998         1997         1996         1995         1994
--------                               -----       ------       ------       ------       ------

<S>                                    <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>    
Net Income (Loss)                      2,291       44,549       (1,447)      (2,293)      (5,256)
Fixed Charges                            405        1,329        2,842        3,455        3,158
                                       -----       ------       ------       ------       ------
Earnings                               2,696       45,878        1,395        1,162       (2,098)
                                       =====       ======       ======       ======       ====== 

Fixed Charges
Interest Expense                         350          944        2,835        3,373        3,153
Interest Element of Rentals                3            5            7            8            5
Amortization of debt costs                52          380            0           74            0
                                       -----       ------       ------       ------       ------
Total Fixed Charges                      405        1,329        2,842        3,455        3,158
                                       =====       ======       ======       ======       ====== 

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges      6.66        34.52           --           --           --
</TABLE>

(1) Earnings for the year ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 were
  insufficient to cover the $2,293, and $5,256, respectively. As a result of
  such deficiencies, the ratios are not present
Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 2 of 17 PageID #:2

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 3 of 17 PageID #:3

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 4 of 17 PageID #:4

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 5 of 17 PageID #:5

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 6 of 17 PageID #:6

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 7 of 17 PageID #:7

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 8 of 17 PageID #:8

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 9 of 17 PageID #:9

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 10 of 17 PageID #:10

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 11 of 17 PageID #:11

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 12 of 17 PageID #:12

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 13 of 17 PageID #:13

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 14 of 17 PageID #:14

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 15 of 17 PageID #:15

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 16 of 17 PageID #:16

Case: 1:03-cv-04514 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/03 Page 17 of 17 PageID #:17
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 

 

May 29, 2018 

s0521 

Order 

 

Clerk 

May 29, 2018 

156084 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 156084 

 COA: 337639 

Washtenaw CC: 04-001501-FC 

RASON ANGELO HORTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2017 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1378

AN ACT

To extend the authorization of use of official mail in the

location and recovery of missing children, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1378 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF OF2 FICIAL MAIL IN THE LOCATION AND RECOV3 ERY OF MISSING CHILDREN.

4 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend title 3, United

5 States Code, to authorize the use of penalty and franked

6 mail in efforts relating to the location and recovery of

7 missing children’’, approved August 9, 1985 (39 U.S.C.

8 3220 note; Public Law 99–87), is amended—

9 (1) in section 3(a) by striking ‘‘June 30, 1997’’

10 and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2002’’; and

11 (2) in section 5 by striking ‘‘December 31,

12 1997’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2002’’.

Passed the Senate November 5, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1378

AN ACT

To extend the authorization of use of official mail

and for other purposes.in the location and recovery of missing children,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

JUL 06 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MICHAEL T. BROOKS, ex rel. United 

States of America; Relator,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

AGATE RESOURCES, INC.; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 21-36016

D.C. No. 6:14-cv-01424-MC

U.S. District Court for Oregon, 

Eugene

MANDATE

The judgment of this Court, entered June 14, 2022, takes effect this date. 

This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 

41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: David J. Vignol

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 128 Filed 07/06/22 Page 1 of 1
Alan R. Unkeles, OSB #77-377 

3000 NW Stucki Place No. 230 

Hillsboro, OR 97124-7328 

(50~531-5370 

(866 799-5977 fax 

sue alanrunkelespc.com 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

ADAM WINTHER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COL VIN, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:14-cv-01323-KI 

Order Allowing Attorney Fees Under 

the Equal Access to Justice Act 

28 U.S.C. § 2412. 

Upon plaintiff's motion for EAJA fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and defendant's 

response, it is hereby ORDERED that an attorney fee of $5,655.74 fee is allowed, 

subject to Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. If plaintiff has no federal 

debt subject to offset, the fee shall be paid to the order of plaintiffs attorney Alan 

R. Unkeles and mailed to him directly at 3000 NW Stucki Place No. 230, Hillsboro 

Oregon. fI 

DA TED thi' l~ay offobrnary 2016 ;:7\J if/',-\ }r; ,::_ lJ!'i 

Gal>r M. King () 

United States District Judge 

Submitted by: 

Alan R. Unk:eles OSB # 77-3773 

l of l Order Allowing Attorney Fees. 

Case 3:14-cv-01323-KI Document 31 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 1
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1458

To restrict the use of the exchange stabilization fund.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8, 1997

Mr. FAIRCLOTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To restrict the use of the exchange stabilization fund.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accountability for

5 International Bailouts Act of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.

7 Section 5302 of title 31, United States Code, is

8 amended by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(e) CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.—Notwithstanding

10 any other provision of this section, the Secretary of the

11 Treasury may not make any expenditure or loan, incur

12 any other obligation, or make any guarantee in excess of
2

•S 1458 IS

1 $250,000,000 through the stabilization fund, for the pur2 pose of engaging in a coordinated international rescue

3 plan for any foreign entity or any government of a foreign

4 country, without the approval of Congress.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             127,497
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            127,497
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>               44,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    172,213
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         375,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               375,122
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          181,023
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               3,826
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               3,710
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         (383,932)
<NET-ASSETS>                     (202,909)
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                       0
<OTHER-INCOME>                        917
<EXPENSES-NET>                   (105,883)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (104,966)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>               0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (104,966)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>               116
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (105,034)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                 232
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                  (105,883)
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>             (150,392)
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  74
<PER-SHARE-NII>                       (28)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    48
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      70.4
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to Investment Managers and Investors as it is not 
taxable.
</FN>

</TABLE>
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1284

To prohibit construction of any monument, memorial, or other structure

at the site of the Iwo Jima Memorial in Arlington, Virginia, and for

other purposes

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 9, 1997

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To prohibit construction of any monument, memorial, or

other structure at the site of the Iwo Jima Memorial

in Arlington, Virginia, and for other purposes

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION

4 AT IWO JIMA MEMORIAL.

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—No person (including any govern6 mental entity) may construct any monument, memorial,

7 or other structure (whether above grade or below grade)

8 on the parcel of Federal land that is—
2

•S 1284 IS

1 (1) located south of Rosslyn, Virginia, and

2 north of the Arlington National Cemetery; and

3 (2) bounded on the west by Meade Street, on

4 the north by Arlington Boulevard (United States

5 Route 50), on the east by Jefferson Davis Highway

6 (Virginia Route 110), and on the south by Marshall

7 Drive.

8 (b) CONSTRUCTION COMMENCED BEFORE ENACT9 MENT.—A person (including a governmental entity) that

10 commenced construction of a monument, memorial, or

11 other structure before the date of enactment of this Act

12 on the parcel described in subsection (a) shall—

13 (1) immediately cease construction; and

14 (2) as promptly as practicable, restore all land

15 affected by the construction to its condition before

16 commencement of construction.

17 (c) EXISTING MEMORIALS AND STRUCTURES.—

18 Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) applies to the United

19 States Marine Corps Memorial (commonly known as the

20 ‘‘Iwo Jima Memorial’’) or to the Netherlands Carillon.

21 (d) ENFORCEMENT.—

22 (1) JURISDICTION.—A person may bring a civil

23 action in United States district court against any

24 person (including the United States) to enforce sub25 sections (a) and (b).
3

•S 1284 IS

1 (2) COURT ORDERS.—The court shall issue

2 such orders as are necessary to restrain any viola3 tion of subsection (a) and to enforce subsection (b).

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JAMES E. ROSS 

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 1:14-cv-1235-TC 

v. 

ORDER 

LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 

Defendant. 

MCSHANE, Judge: 

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 

32), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 

Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. 

Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude it is correct. 

1 -OPINION AND ORDER 

Case 6:14-cv-01235-TC Document 37 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 2
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and 

Recommendation (ECF No. 32) is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Fourth 

Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23) is dismissed without leave to amend, as set forth in Judge 

Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 32). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this 12th day of January, 2015. 

2- OPINION AND ORDER 

Michael J. McShane 

United States District Judge 

Case 6:14-cv-01235-TC Document 37 Filed 01/12/15 Page 2 of 2