alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Beltsville Agricultural Research Center: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Darrell F Harley
                        Facilities Division

                        




                        
                        Boiler Plant Operator
                        Phone: (301) 504-5219
                        
                        
                        Fax: (301) 504-7348(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit
23





Consent
of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





HearUSA
Inc.


West Palm
Beach, Florida





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-3 (File Nos.333-157347, 333-144224, 333-128605, 333-115399, 333-38862,
333-64571, 333-24357, 333-25169, 333-18753, 333-11429, 333-04639, and 333-04303)
and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-161609, 333-08523, and 333-144904) of
HearUSA,Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2010 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.








/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP




West Palm
Beach, Florida


March 26,
2010
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1767 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1767

     To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require 
 notification of recalls of drugs and devices, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 1998

   Mr. Dodd introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require 
 notification of recalls of drugs and devices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drug and Device Recall Reporting Act 
of 1998''.

SEC. 2. RECALLS.

    Subchapter E of chapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``SEC. 564. NOTIFICATION OF RECALLS.

    ``(a) Notification to Customers.--A pharmacy that receives notice 
from a recalling firm regarding a Class I or Class II recall of a drug 
or device shall provide notification about the recall to customers that 
received the drug or device as follows:
            ``(1) In the case of a drug or device dispensed by the 
        pharmacy to customers on the prescription of a licensed 
        practitioner, by providing, at a minimum, written notification 
        to each of the customers.
            ``(2) In the case of another drug or device, by public 
        display in the pharmacy of a notice regarding the recall.
    ``(b) Civil Penalty.--Any pharmacy that violates subsection (a) 
shall be liable to the United States for a civil penalty in an amount 
not to exceed $10,000 for each such violation.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Class i or class ii.--The term `Class I' or `Class 
        II' refers to the corresponding designation given recalls in 
        subpart A of part 7 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, 
        or a successor regulation.
            ``(2) Recall.--The term `recall' means--
                    ``(A) a recall, as defined in subpart A of part 7 
                of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, or a 
                successor regulation; and
                    ``(B) a recall under section 518(e).
            ``(3) Recalling firm.--The term `recalling firm' means--
                    ``(A) a recalling firm, as defined in subpart A of 
                part 7 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, or a 
                successor regulation; and
                    ``(B) a person subject to an order issued under 
                section 518(e)(1).''.
                                 <all>
```
ex10-1.htm


     

    Exhibit
10.1

    


     

    
      	
              Exhibit

              Number

            	 
      	
              Description

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              10.1

               

            	 
      	
              Asset
      Purchase Agreement dated October 10, 2008 by and among TV Guide Magazine
      Group, Inc., Sample Media, LLC, and, solely with respect to Sections 2.7,
      6.2 and 6.3, Macrovision Solutions Corporation (incorporated by reference
      to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on October 14,
      2008).
#### In the Matter of Natasha M., Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Gaston Y., Respondent. Danielle Schwager, Nonparty Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 687]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the attorney for the child appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffman, J.), dated October 4, 2011, which, without a hearing, granted the motion of Gaston Y. to modify a prior order of the same court dated April 11, 2011, to the extent of permitting two hours of visitation per week between Gaston Y. and the subject child, to be supervised by the petitioner or a person approved by the petitioner.

Ordered that the order dated October 4, 2011, is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and matter is remitted to the Family Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

In 2009 the petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging that Gaston Y. had engaged in sexual contact with the daughter of his former paramour, and sought to limit his contact with the subject child, the daughter of his new paramour. In an order of fact-finding and disposition dated April 28, 2010, the Family Court, inter alia, found that Gaston Y. had neglected the subject child, and placed Gaston Y. under the petitioner’s supervision for a period of one year (see Family Ct Act § 1052 [a] [v]; § 1057; *Matter of Tiana G. [Gaston Y.],*84 AD3d 1375 [2011]). The supervision was extended in an order dated April 11, 2011. The terms of Gaston Y.’s supervision included a condition that Gaston Y. have no contact with the subject child.

Gaston Y. and the subject child’s mother subsequently married. In August 2011, Gaston Y. moved to modify the order dated April 11, 2011, so as to be permitted visitation with the subject child. The petitioner consented to supervised contact between Gaston Y. and the subject child, but the attorney for the child opposed it. In an order dated October 4, 2011, the Family Court, without a hearing, granted Gaston Y.’s motion to the extent of permitting two hours of visitation per week between Gaston Y. *766and the subject child, to be supervised by the petitioner or a person approved by the petitioner.

Under the circumstances of this case, we agree with the attorney for the child that the Family Court should have conducted a full evidentiary hearing before determining whether Gaston Y. demonstrated “good cause” for modification of the prior order of supervision (Family Ct Act § 1061), and whether modification of the prior order would be in the best interests of the subject child *(see Matter of Lemar H.,*23 AD3d 383, 384 [2005]). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Family Court, Suffolk County, to conduct such a hearing and make such determinations, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter.

The remaining contention of the attorney for the child is without merit. Angiolillo, J.E, Belen, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Alliance Health, Inc.
File No. 0-21071

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Health, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Sarkis  J.
Kechejian,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 11, 2007                         By: /s/ Sarkis J. Kechejian
      ----------------                            ------------------------------
                                                             Sarkis J. Kechejian
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alliance Health,  Inc. and will be retained by Alliance Health, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

(i) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|      |  |                |  | 
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | March 27, 2009 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ C. Kirk Peacock    
|      |  |                |  |  |  | Name:  |  | C. Kirk Peacock        
|      |  |                |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory People & Locations







Zacharias J Smith

(Zach)
                        Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Chemist
                        Phone: (301) 504-7490
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PENNY LEE POWELL, 6:14-cv-01899-JE

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Commissioner, Social Security 

Administration,

 Defendant.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and

Recommendation (#19) on September 29, 2016, in which he

recommends this Court reverse and remand the Commissioner's

decision denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental

security income benefits and disability insurance benefits for

further administrative proceedings. The matter is now before

this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 72(b).

 - ORDER 1

Case 6:14-cv-01899-JE Document 21 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 2
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall,

561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not

find any error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and

Recommendation (#19). Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the

decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative

proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 1st day of November, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

 - ORDER 2

Case 6:14-cv-01899-JE Document 21 Filed 11/01/16 Page 2 of 2
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 8, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133594 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133594 COA: 271459 Lapeer CC: 06-008723-AR 71-A DC: 05-2703-SD MARK RYAN NICKERSON, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presen ted should be reviewed by this Court. As stated in the Staff Comment to the 2005 Amendment of M CR 6.610, the Court has declined to add a new MCR 6.610(F) providing for di scovery in district court.

p0605 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 8, 2007

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MOSLEH ADNAN, 3:14-cv-01941-ST

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. 

 

THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC.,

 Defendant.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and

Recommendation (#34) on November 20, 2015, in which she

recommends this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant's

Motion (#29) for Terminating Sanctions or, Alternatively, for

Summary Judgment, and dismiss all claims in Plaintiff’s Third

Amended Complaint (#20) with prejudice. The matter is now before

1 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01941-ST Document 38 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 2
this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall,

561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not

find any error.

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and

Recommendation (#34). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant's

Motion (#29) for Terminating Sanctions; DENIES as moot

Defendant’s alternative Motion (#29) for Summary Judgment; and

DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 15th day of December, 2015.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01941-ST Document 38 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 2
Order entered December 5, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01361
- CV STEPHEN GONZALEZ, ET AL, Appellant s V. STEPHANIE GONZALEZ, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. DC
- 11
- 04009 

### O RDER
Bas e d on the record before us, we GRANT appellants’ December 2, 2014, motion to extend time to file notice of appeal

. Appellants’ October 14, 2014, notice of appeal is considered timely for jurisdictional purposes.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sugarcane Field Station: Canal Point, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Canal Point, Florida Sugarcane Field Station People & Locations







Larry  Harrell
                        Sugarcane Field Station

                        




                        
                        Laborer
                        Phone: (561) 924-5227
                        
                        
                        Fax: (561) 924-6109(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ade Ngaii, Appellant.

[947 NYS2d 107]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Núñez, J.), entered on or about November 18, 2010, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the motion granted, the order replaced by an order specifying and informing defendant of a proposed sentence of five years plus two years’ postrelease supervision, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Substantial justice does not dictate denial of resentencing, and we exercise our discretion to specify an appropriate resentence *(see e.g. People v Milton,*86 AD3d 478 [2011]). The court denied the motion primarily on the basis of defendant’s history of failing to complete the residential drug treatment alternative programs to which he had been diverted in 2000 in connection with the underlying offense, resulting in an escalation of enhanced sentences. However, despite defendant’s relapses he managed to stay drug-free in the programs for extended periods of time. Moreover, defendant was only 16 years old at the time of the underlying arrest.

Defendant has made significant strides toward drug rehabilitation during his present imprisonment, and his disciplinary record is not particularly serious. He has taken vocational courses while in prison, and has strong family support, including a place to live upon release and help obtaining future employment. We further note that defendant has no history of violence either in or out of prison, and the remainder of his adult criminal history consists of convictions arising out of an additional street-level drug sale and bail jumping that occurred during his periods of relapse. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.