alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 155 (Monday, August 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 45750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17509]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on HEDGE V

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 22, 2021, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Cooperative Research Group on 
HEDGE V (``HEDGE V'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Cummins, Inc., Columbus, IN; Convergent Science, 
Madison, WI; GM Global Technology Operations, LLC (GMGTO), Detroit, MI; 
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, Wolfsburg, GERMANY; and Robert Bosch 
LLC, Farmington Hills, MI. The general area of HEDGE V's planned 
activity is to identify ICE technologies to achieve 50% brake thermal 
efficiency while maintaining a stoichiometric air/fuel ratio suitable 
for three-way catalyst operation. Other topics of interest to the 
consortium include: large-bore s.i. combustion systems; assisted pre-
chambers; Hybrid-ICE focus including ICE design for hybrid application; 
engine geometry changes; advanced combustion modes, SACI & D-EGR, sCO2 
as a cooling medium or WHR system; high-power and voltage systems 
including microwave enhanced heating, CO2 Separation Membrane for 
Octane-on-Demand, and on-board hydrogen generation for combustion 
enhancement.

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-17509 Filed 8-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JAMES DONALD JACKSON, JR., No. 2:13-cv-00798-ST

Petitioner, ORDER

v. 

 

MARK NOOTH,

 Respondent.

James Donald Jackson, Jr.

6341425

Snake River Correctional Institution

777 Stanton Blvd

Ontario, OR 97914-8335

Pro Se Petitioner

Kristen E. Boyd

State of Oregon

Department of Justice

1162 Court Street, NE

Salem, OR 97301

Attorney for Respondent

1 - ORDER

Case 2:13-cv-00798-ST Document 78 Filed 10/01/14 Page 1 of 2
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation [65] on April 22, 2014, 

in which she recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus 

[3] with prejudice. Petitioner timely filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The 

matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the 

Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th 

Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). 

I have carefully considered Petitioner’s objections and conclude that the objections do not 

provide a basis to modify the recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the 

record de novo and find no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Stewart’s Findings and Recommendation [65]. 

Therefore, Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus [3] is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this day of ____________________, 2014.

 

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 2:13-cv-00798-ST Document 78 Filed 10/01/14 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FRANK WINN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 161 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
INNIDI110 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 23-0005 

IN RE MOTION OF LISANNE MARCHESE 

BUTTERFIELD, FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR 

OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

ORDER 

Lisanne Marchese Butterfield has moved for admission to the Bar of the State of 

Montana pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar 

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the 

Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Butterfield has provided the 

necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on 

motion under Rule V. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Lisanne Marchese Butterfield may be sworn in to the practice of law in the 

State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of 

the Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. `r_1:7,

DATED this t) day of October, 2023. 

FILED 

OCT 1 0 2023 

Bowen Greenw000 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

Stato of AAontane 

Chief Justice 

10/10/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0005
‘94 1:4ajL
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Projects
                        NP 301Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research People & Locations







Aalyah  Garcia
                        Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Aid (Plants)
                        Phone: (806) 749-5560
                        
                        
                        Fax: (806) 723-5272(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<logo> KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

1900
1021 East Cant Street
Richmond. VA 232194023

Independent Auditors' Report

The Board of Directors and Stockholder American Home Funding, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion about American 
Home Funding, Inc.'s compliance with the minimum 
servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers 
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation 
Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the 
year ended November 30, 1996 included in the accompanying 
management assertion. Management is responsible for 
American Home Funding, Inc.'s compliance with those 
minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to 
express an opinion on management's assertion about the 
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards 
established by the American Institute of Certified Public 
Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a 
text basis, evidence about American Home Funding Inc.'s 
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and 
performing such other procedures as we considered 
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our 
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 
Our examination does not provide a legal determination on 
American Home Funding Inc.'s compliance with the minimum 
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that American Home 
Funding, Inc. complied with the aforementioned minimum 
servicing standards as of and for the year ended November 
30, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
January 9, 1997
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00308-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-0021111-1

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

SANDY JOYCE, Appellant

V.

HOMETOWNE AT MATADOR RANCH, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 28, 2022. On December 12, 

2022, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules 

require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an 

appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s 

untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded her an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 5, 2023
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research: Wenatchee, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Wenatchee, Washington Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research People & Locations







Amanda B Jeffries
                        Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Lab Technician
                        Phone: (509) 664-2280
                         ext. 238
                        
                        Fax: (509) 664-2287(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

L.H., the Father,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD 

LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-2863

[January 18, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Kathleen J. Kroll, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15DP300629 JL.

Andrew A. Holness of the Law Offices of Andrew A. Holness, P.A., West 

Palm Beach, for appellant.

Casey Barron and Meredith K. Hall, Children’s Legal Services, 

Bradenton, for appellee, Department of Children and Families.

Sara E. Goldfarb, Sanford, for appellee, Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  Exhibit 23.2



                         CONSENT OF S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated October 11,
1996 on our audit of the consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity
and cash flows of Tuscarora Incorporated and subsidiaries as of and for the year
ended August 31, 1996, which report is filed as Exhibit 99 to this annual report
on Form 10-K, in the following documents:

                  1. Registration Statement No. 333-57833 on Form S-8 for the
1997 Stock Incentive Plan of Tuscarora Incorporated, filed under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and the Prospectus used in connection with such
Registration Statement;

                  2. Registration Statements No. 33-35373 and No. 333-06111 on
Form S-8 for the 1985 Incentive Stock Option Plan and 1989 Stock Incentive Plan
of Tuscarora Incorporated, filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and the Prospectus used in connection with such Registration Statements; and

                  3. Registration Statement No. 33-35587 on Form S-8 for the
Tuscarora Incorporated Common Stock Purchase Plan for Salaried Employees, filed
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Prospectus used in
connection with such Registration Statement.


                                              /s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.,

Beaver Falls, PA
November 25, 1998
Alan Stuart Graf, OSB # 923I7 

alangraf@aracnet. com 

208 Pine St 

Floyd, VA 2409I 

Telephone: 540-745-25I9 

Fax: 93I-964-3I27 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MISTY SHAFOR 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

6: I4-CV -I577 -CL 

ORDER FOR EAJA 

ATTORNEY FEES 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded 

attorney fees in the amount of $4,529.08. Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury 

Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, I39 S. Ct. 252I (20IO), payment of this award 

shall be made payable to Plaintiffs attorney: 

Alan Stuart Graf, PC, 208 Pine St., Floyd VA 2409I. 

It is so ORDERED 

Dated this~ day of September, 20 I5 ~ .···· 

// 

/~~-?'~ ~ 

A.ited States Magistrate Judge 

Prepared as to form 

Is/ Alan Graf 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES-I 

Case 6:14-cv-01577-CL Document 24 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Melton *et al. v.*James.

April 17, 1915.

Motion for new trial; from Early superior court. Motion to dismiss.

*Glessner & Park,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Little, Powell, Hooper & Goldstein*and *Rambo & Wright,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

A motion by the respondent in a motion for new trial to dismiss it was overruled by the court. The respondent had the option to sue out a direct bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment, or to have certified and filed exceptions pendente lite. If the latter course be followed, the ruling on the motion to dismiss becomes a pendente-lite ruling, which is reviewable only after the termination of the motion for new trial, on exception taken to the final judgment rendered thereon. *Durrence*v. *Waters,*140 *Ga.*762 (79 S. E. 841); *Bradley*v. *Lithonia &c. R. Co.,*143 *Ga.*274 (84 S. E. 590). It not appearing that the motion for new trial has been disposed of, and the only exception being to the pendente-lite ruling, the writ of error will be dismissed.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of MedPartners, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated March 13,
1998, with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of MedPartners, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997
as follows:

     Form S-8 No. 033-86806 pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan;
     Form S-8 No. 333-11875 pertaining to MedPartners' Incentive Compensation
     Plan;
     Form S-8 No. 333-11127 pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan;
     Form S-8 No. 333-05703 pertaining to MedPartners' Employee Savings Plan;
     Form S-8 No. 333-14159 pertaining to Caremark's Employee Savings Plan;
     Form S-8 No. 333-14163 pertaining to Caremark's Non-Employee/Director Stock
     Option Plan and
     Caremark's Stock Purchase Plan;
     Form S-8 No. 333-38835 pertaining to MedPartners' 1997 Long Term Incentive
     Compensation Plan;
     Form S-8 No. 333-16863 pertaining to MedPartner's Employee Stock Purchase
     Plan;
     Form S-3 No. 333-17339 pertaining to the resale of common stock by certain
     selling stockholders;
     Form S-8 No. 333-30145 pertaining to MedPartner's 1994 Non-Employee
     Director Stock Option Plan and 1994 Stock Incentive Plan; and
     Form S-8 No. 333-42967 pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock
     Option Plan.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

March 31, 1998
#### KENNEDDY, Appellant, v. GARRICK et al., Respondents.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

June 30, 1896.)

Action by John A. ICenneddy, assignee, etc., against Robert A. Garrick and others.

Dennis Quinn, for appellant.

Horace C. Skelly, for respondents. Oswald N. Jacoby, in pro. per.

CONLAN, *J.*

Order appealed from modified, so far as it requires Dennis Quinn to repay to Oswald N. Jacoby the sum of $191.78, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs. VAN WYCK, C. J., concurs.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 145

To repeal the prohibition against government restrictions on communications

between government agencies and the INS.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To repeal the prohibition against government restrictions

on communications between government agencies and the

INS.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE PROHIBITION AGAINST GOV4 ERNMENT RESTRICTIONS ON COMMUNICA5 TIONS BETWEEN GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

6 AND THE INS.

7 (a) WELFARE.—Section 434 of the Personal Respon8 sibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996

9 (Public Law 104–193, 110 Stat. 2275) is repealed.
2

•S 145 IS

1 (b) IMMIGRATION.—Section 642 of the Illegal Immi2 gration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996

3 (Public Law 104–208, 110 Stat 3009-1834) is amended—

4 (1) by striking subsections (a) and (b); and

5 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘(c) OBLIGA6 TION TO RESPOND TO INQUIRIES.—’’.

Æ
STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA

Rol

NO. 2023 KW 0538

SIMON JOHN QUINN JULY 28, 2023

In Re: Simon John Quinn, applying for supervisory writs, 32nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 

700, 389. 

BEFORE: HOLDRIDGE, CHUTZ, AND PENZATO, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

GH

WRC

ARP
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Floral and Nursery Plants Research: Washington, DC
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Washington, D.C. National Arboretum Floral and Nursery Plants Research People & Locations







Ramona A Mathis
                        Floral and Nursery Plants Research

                        




                        
                        Office Automation Clerk
                        Phone: (931) 815-5156
                        
                        
                        Fax: (931) 668-2985(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov