alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Commodity Protection and Quality Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research
                                    Water Management Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Commodity Protection and Quality Research People & Locations







Alyssa Marie Cano
                        Commodity Protection and Quality Research

                        




                        
                        Physical Science Aid
                        Phone: (559) 596-2744
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of John J. McLaughlin (Admitted as John J. McLaughlin, Jr.), an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

February 10, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Claudio B. Bergamasco*of counsel *(Michael A. Gentile,*attorney), for petitioner.

*Joel Cohen*of counsel *(Stroock & Stroock & Lavan,*attorneys), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice in the First Depart*81ment on December 23, 1971, under the name John J. McLaughlin, Jr. On August 27, 1986 respondent was found guilty, after jury trial in New York State Supreme Court, of grand larceny in the second degree (two counts), forgery in the second degree, and offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, all of which are felonies, and one count of offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree, a misdemeanor. On December 9, 1986, respondent was sentenced to six months in prison plus five years’ probation.

Respondent was automatically disbarred upon his conviction of a felony on August 27, 1986. (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]; CPL 1.20 [13]; *see Matter of Swirsky,*103 AD2d 195.) Accordingly, the petition should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys forthwith.

Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective February 10, 1987.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Stetson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Stetson  
|Robert J. Stetson      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|November 9, 2004
# C_2005331EN.01001301.xml

| 28.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/13

---

Notice inviting applications for authorisation to extract hydrocarbons in the Oosterwolde area on Dutch territory

(2005/C 331/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands hereby gives notice that an application for authorisation to extract hydrocarbons has been received for the Oosterwolde area. The area is delimited by the following points and the straight lines between them:

| A. | x = 214665 | y = 550806 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| B. | x = 217620 | y = 550551 |
| C. | x = 217476 | y = 549132 |
| D. | x = 214513 | y = 549373 |

A.

x = 214665

y = 550806

B.

x = 217620

y = 550551

C.

x = 217476

y = 549132

D.

x = 214513

y = 549373

The coordinates correspond to the system used by the Rijks Driehoeksmeting

In accordance with Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospecting, exploration and production of hydrocarbons and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Staatsblad 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs invites interested parties to submit an application for authorisation to extract hydrocarbons for the Oosterwolde area.

Mijnbouwwet

Applications may be submitted for 13 weeks following the publication of this invitation in the Official Journal of the European Union and must be sent to the Minister for Economic Affairs, for the attention of the Director of Energy Production, and marked ‘personal’, Prinses Beatrixlaan 5, The Hague, the Netherlands. Applications submitted after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after the period has expired.

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Staatsblad 2002, No 542).

Mijnbouwwet

Further information can be requested by telephone (31-70) 379 73 82.

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetics Research: Columbia, MO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Columbia, Missouri Plant Genetics Research People & Locations







Serena  Hepkins
                        Plant Genetics Research

                        




                        
                        BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone: (314) 587-1466
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
  OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 13350


Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and
Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Noble International
Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                    By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER L. MORIN
                                       ------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Christopher L. Morin
                                    Title: President and Chief Operating Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer) of
                                           Noble International, Ltd.




                                    By: /s/ JAY J. HANSEN
                                       ------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Jay J. Hansen
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
                                           of Noble International, Ltd.
_____________ No. 94-3783WM No. 95-1417WM

_____________ James Frederick Newport, * * Appellant, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Michelin Aircraft Tire, also * known as Michelin Tire * [UNPUBLISHED] Corporation, * * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: December 22, 1995 Filed: December 29, 1995

_____________ Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Jame s Frederick Newport appeals the district court's order s dismissing three coun ts of his complaint and granting summary judgment on the remaining count. Having carefully considered the record and th e parties' briefs, we conclude Newport is not entitled to relief. We also denyN ewport's motion to dissolve the district court's protective orde r enjoining Newport from entering appellee's property without writte n consent. Discussion of the issues presented by this appeal will serve no useful purpose. We thus affirm the district court's decisions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of The State of New York ex rel. Albert Williams, Appellant, v Harold D. Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[948 NYS2d 841]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), entered March 14, 2011 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied and dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willis Kelly, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), both rendered January 6, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 2668/83, and rape in the third degree under Superior Court information No. W-2607/83 upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea to burglary in the second degree on the ground of double jeopardy was properly denied *(see, People v Prescott,*66 NY2d 216; *People v Harris,*119 Misc 2d 172; *People v Fletcher,*113 Misc 2d 5). Defendant’s claim concerning an alleged misrepresentation made by his counsel at the time of the hearing on the motion to withdraw the plea is not supported by the record *(cf. People v Ramos,*63 NY2d 640). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
“AO 450(Rev. $/85)Judgment ina Civil Case

United States District Court
Northern District of Illinois

Illinois Dept of Human Services

v.

United States Dept of Ed. Et al.

Eastern Division

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Case Number: 02 C 6721

oO Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been
tried and the jury rendered its verdict.

a Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues
have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that defendants’ motion for summary

judgment is granted.

Date: 3/5/2003

BOCR STE
MAR 6 2003

4
=

Michael W. Dobbins, Clerk of Court

DSH Oho

Willie A. Haynes, Deputy Clerk
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Ethel B. Atkinson, Deceased. First National Bank of Cortland et al., as Coexecutors of Ethel B. Atkinson, Deceased, Respondents; Young Women’s Christian Association of Cortland, New York, Inc., Appellant.

—Weiss, J.

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Cortland County (Kepner, Jr., S.), entered February 26, 1985, which denied a motion for the appointment of an independent expert witness.

This is a proceeding for the judicial settlement of the account of the coexecutors of the estate of Ethel B. Atkinson. Respondent is a residuary charitable legatee under the will, entitled to a 2% share of the estate. When this matter was previously before this court, we determined that the Surrogate improperly quashed a subpoena issued by respondent to one Robert J. Galey, then a trust officer with the Bank of New York, before a determination could be made as to whether Galey’s opinion as an expert was being sought (103 AD2d 960). The purport of our decision was that the witness could be required to testify as to "custom and usage” of estate management in the banking industry, if he was so qualified. Although the actual transcripts are not before us, the record indicates that on December 17, 1984, Galey was called by respondent to testify, but denied knowledge of "custom and usage” in the management of decedent’s estates. On that same date, respondent’s motion for the appointment of an independent expert witness to examine the books and records of the coexecutors was denied, giving rise to this appeal.

*844Although we agree with respondent’s contention that the Surrogate has the inherent power to appoint an expert witness if necessary to achieve a just disposition *(see, Scott v Spanjer Bros.,*298 F2d 928, 930-931), under the circumstances presented herein, we find no abuse of discretion in the Surrogate’s refusal to do so. This was not a proceeding lacking in expert testimony. The coexecutors produced one William Fancher, senior vice-president and trust officer of Key Trust Company, a division of Key Banks, Inc., of Syracuse, New York, who testified not only as to "custom and usage” of estate management in the banking industry, but also rendered an opinion that the subject estate was properly administered. Significantly, respondent had every opportunity to cross-examine this witness *(see, Carrasquillo v Rothschild,*110 Misc 2d 758). Moreover, respondent was allowed to examine Galey, and while the latter apparently was uncooperative, no effort was made to hold this witness in contempt. The Surrogate was in the best position to determine whether any further expertise was necessary to assess the propriety of the estate’s management.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-4890

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER BRIAN KIRKLAND, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00254) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fredilyn Sison, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Corey F. Ellis, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Christopher Brian Kirkland pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000), and was sentenced to a term of seventy-seven months imprisonment. Kirkland appeals his sentence, contending that the district court erred when it held that he had two prior convictions for controlled substance offenses and applied a base offense level of 24 under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(a)(2) (2005). We affirm. The enhanced base offense level applies if the defendant had two prior felony convictions for controlled substance offenses as defined in USSG § 4B1.2(b), which includes “the possession of a controlled substance (or a counterfeit substance) with intent to manufacture, import, export, distribute, or dispense.” After examining the charging documents and the judgment in each case, the district court determined that Kirkland had two prior convictions for possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(a) (2005). Although Kirkland argues on appeal that the convictions were for simple possession, or that the charging documents did not establish the offense of conviction with enough specificity, or that the offenses should have been treated as misdemeanors because the quantity of cocaine was small, the record supports the district court’s determination. Moreover, the court complied with the dictates of Taylor v. United States , 495 U.S. 575 (1990), and- 3 - Shepard v. United States , 544 U.S. 13 (2005), in making its determination. We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2005256EN.01001101.xml

| 15.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/11

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(2005/C 256/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

DENMARK

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bel Air Helicopters ApS | Dalbækvej 2A, DK-6670 Holsted | passengers, mail, cargo | 1.8.2005 |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

Bel Air Helicopters ApS

Dalbækvej 2A, DK-6670 Holsted

passengers, mail, cargo

1.8.2005

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---