alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I, Owen Naccarato, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of International Packaging and Logistics Group, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Gala Global Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:  May 14, 2015 |  |                                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |                                                                                            
|                     |  |                                                                                            
|                     |  | /s/ Owen Naccarato                                                                         
|                     |  | Owen Naccarato                                                                             
|                     |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director        
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                     |  |
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J ORGE BARAHO NA PAI Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 71205 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 524- 548 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jorge B ar ahon a P ai z, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f G uat em al a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n de port a t i on pr oc e e di ngs . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED JU L 22 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 71205 2 ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 400 F . 3d 785, 791 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . W e de nyi n partand di s m i s s i n partthe pe t i t i on f or r e v ie w . T he a ge nc ydi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng B ar ahonaP a i z ’ s m ot i on to r e o p e n a s u n tim e lyw h e r e th e m o tio n w a s f ile dm o r e th an tw e lv e y e ar s a f te rh is d e p o rta tio n o r d e rb e c a m e f in a l. See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 23 (b)( 1) (m ot i on t o reopen m us tbe f

i l e d w i thi n 90 day s of

f i na l a dm i ni s tr a t i ve or de rorbe f or e S e pt e m be r30, 1 9 9 6 , w h ic h e v e ris la te r ) . I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e ne e d nota ddr e s s B ar ahonaP a i z ’ s c ont e nt i on r e g ar d in g h is e lig ib ilityf o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the B I A ’ s de c i s i on nott o i nvoke i t s s ua s p o n te au th o r ityto r e o p e n p r o c e e d in g s u n d e r8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( a ) . Se e Me j i aH erna ndezv. H

older , 6 3 3 F .3 d8 1 8 , 8 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
H. Gray, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ John H. GrayJohn H. GraySenior Vice President, Finance and Administration(Principal Financial Officer)June 14, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Garcia, Appellant.

[948 NYS2d 242]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J., at motion to controvert search warrant; Herbert I. Altman, J.H.O., at *Darden*hearing; Ruth Pickholz, J, at *Mappl Dunaway/Huntley*hearing, plea, and sentencing), rendered June 15, 2010, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender whose prior felony conviction was a violent felony, to a term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, made on the ground that the evidence was the fruit of an unlawful stop. Defendant also challenges the denial of suppression of other evidence obtained from his apartment pursuant to a search warrant. In each instance, we find no basis for suppression of any evidence.

In a drug-prone location, an officer saw defendant standing on the street, looking up the street with a cell phone in his hand. Eventually, a late model BMW with New Hampshire plates pulled up and defendant entered it. While defendant and the car’s female driver were parked, the officer saw defendant *482and the driver make hand motions that reasonably suggested an exchange of unidentified objects, concealed in closed fists. The driver then tucked into her brassiere the item that defendant had apparently handed her.

Based on his extensive experience in drug arrests, the officer recognized these actions, viewed as a whole, to form a pattern of suspicious activity indicative of a drug transaction *(see People v Jones,*90 NY2d 835 [1997]; *People v Bonilla,*81 AD3d 555 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 792 [2011]; *People v Smith,*60 AD3d 456 [2009] [concealment of unknown object in sock among factors suggesting drug sale], *lv denied*12 NY3d 859 [2009]). Accordingly, the police had reasonable suspicion upon which to stop the car in which defendant was a passenger.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to controvert the search warrant. Nothing in the testimony at either the initial or the reopened *Darden*hearing *(People v Darden,*34 NY2d 177 [1974]) provided any basis for suppression, or required a further reopening of the hearing *(see People v Adrion,*82 NY2d 628, 635 [1993]; *People v Bradley,*181 AD2d 316, 319 [1992], *appeal dismissed*81 NY2d 760 [1992]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1184

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to waive nonimmigrant visa

fees for aliens seeking to enter the United States to engage in certain

charitable activities.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 17, 1997

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. LEAHY, Mr.

DEWINE, and Mr. BIDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to waive

nonimmigrant visa fees for aliens seeking to enter the

United States to engage in certain charitable activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF NONIMMIGRANT VISA FEES FOR

4 CERTAIN CHARITABLE PURPOSES.

5 Section 281 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

6 (8 U.S.C. 1351) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new sentence: ‘‘Subject to such criteria as the Sec8 retary of State may prescribe, including the duration of

9 stay of the alien and the financial burden upon the chari-
2

•S 1184 IS

1 table organization, the Secretary of State shall waive or

2 reduce the fee for application and issuance of a non3 immigrant visa for any alien coming to the United States

4 primarily for, or in activities related to, a charitable pur5 pose involving health or nursing care, the provision of food

6 or housing, job training, or any other similar direct service

7 or assistance to poor or otherwise needy individuals in the

8 United States.’’.

Æ
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed June 8, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2154

Lower Tribunal Nos. F05-31668B, F13-17135, F05-31667B, F05-32228B, 

F05-32515B

________________

Anthony Willard Johnson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. 

Fernandez, Judge.

Anthony Willard Johnson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00033-CR

Christina L. McQuade

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2 of McLennan County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20150060 CR2

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 29, 2016
#### In the Matter of Mark C. Poloncarz, Appellant, v Christopher C. Collins et al., Respondents.

[945 NYS2d 919]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Gerald J. Whalen, J.), dated November 19, 2010 in a declaratory judgment action/CPLR article 78 proceed*1503ing. The judgment dismissed the complaint/petition (denominated petition).

Now upon reading and filing the stipulations of discontinuance of appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on December 21, 2011 and January 23, 2012,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto and Lindley, JJ.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 8, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2154 Lower Tribunal Nos. F05-31668B, F13-17135, F05-31667B, F05-32228B, F05-32515B

________________ Anthony Willard Johnson, Appellant 

### , vs. The State of Florida, Appellee


### . An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge. Anthony Willard Johnson, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
exhibit102






CERTAIN INFORMATION, IDENTIFIED BY [*****], HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM  THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY  CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. Exhibit 10.2 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO SERVICING AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO SERVICING AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is  made as of April 16, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) by and between GreenSky, LLC, a Georgia  limited liability company (“Servicer”), and BMO Harris Bank N.A., a national banking  association (“Lender”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall  have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Servicing Agreement (as defined herein). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Lender and Servicer have previously entered into that certain Servicing  Agreement dated as of November 5, 2018, as amended (the “Servicing Agreement”);  WHEREAS, Lender and Servicer desire to amend the Servicing Agreement as set forth  herein;  NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of  which are hereby acknowledged, Lender and Servicer hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective April 1, 2021, the Servicing Agreement is hereby amended as follows: a. Section 3.01(d) of the Servicing Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and  the following is substituted in lieu thereof: “(d) [*****]” b. Section 3.02 of the Servicing Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the  definition of “[*****]” set forth therein and substituting the following in lieu thereof: “[*****]” 2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Servicing Agreement shall remain in  full force and effect. 3. This Amendment may be executed and delivered by Lender and Servicer in  facsimile or PDF format and in any number of separate counterparts, all of which, when  delivered, shall together constitute one and the same document. [Signature page follows] 





 






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first  above written. SERVICER: GREENSKY, LLC By:     /s/ Timothy D. Kaliban Name: Timothy D. Kaliban Title: President LENDER: BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. By:     /s/ Mark Shulman Name: Mark Shulman Title: Head Consumer Lending & Chief CRA Officer
Order entered March 8 , 202 1

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 01573
- CR No. 05
- 19
- 0157 4
- CR
CHRISTOPHER GERARD P RUITT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appell e e O n A ppeal from the 282n d Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F 18
- 55426
- S & F18
- 55425
- S

O RDER
A p pellan t ’ s brief wa s initially due on August 12 , 2020

. On counsel’s motions, w e granted four extensions of time , having consider ed t he Texas Supreme Court’s ongoing direction to liberally allow extensions of time due to the COVID

19 pandemic, making appella nt ’ s brief due on March 1, 2021 . To d ate, no brief has been filed , and we have had no further communication fro m appellant.
W e ORDER th e trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why
app ellant’s b rief has not been filed. In this regard, th e tria l court shall makeappropriate finding s and recommendations and determine whether appellant

desires to prosecute th ese a ppeal s , w he t h e r appellan t has abandoned the appeal s , or whether appointed counse l has aba ndoned the appeal s . See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38 .8 ( b ). If t he trial court cannot obtain appel lant’s presence at the hearing, the trial c ourt shall conduct the hearing in appe llant’s ab s en c e. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 198 7, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indig en t, the trial court is ORDERED to take such m easures as may be necessary to assure effec tive representation, which may include appointme n t of ne w counsel . We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proce edings, which shall include written findin gs and r ecomme ndations, to this Court within
T WENTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DI RECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to t h e Ho n or able Amber Givens , Presiding Judge, 282nd Judicial District Court ; to Valencia Bush ; and to the Dallas County Di strict At torney’s Office , Appellate Division

. Th ese appeals a re ABATE D to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal s s hal l b e re instate d t wenty days from the date of this order or when the findings are receive d, w hichever is earlier.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1510

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 1998

Referred to the Committee on Resources

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary

of Agriculture to convey certain lands to the county

of Rio Arriba, New Mexico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1510 RFH

1 SECTION 1. OLD COYOTE ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.

2 (a) CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY.—Not later than one

3 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

4 of the Interior (herein ‘‘the Secretary’’) shall convey to

5 the County of Rio Arriba, New Mexico (herein ‘‘the Coun6 ty’’), subject to the terms and conditions stated in sub7 section (b), all right, title, and interest of the United

8 States in and to the land (including all improvements on

9 the land) known as the ‘‘Old Coyote Administrative Site’’

located approximately 1 10 ⁄2 mile east of the Village of Coy11 ote, New Mexico, on State Road 96, comprising one tract

12 of 130.27 acres (as described in Public Land Order 3730),

13 and one tract of 276.76 acres (as described in Executive

14 Order 4599).

15 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—

16 (1) Consideration for the conveyance described

17 in subsection (a) shall be—

18 (A) an amount that is consistent with the

19 special pricing program for Governmental enti20 ties under the Recreation and Public Purposes

21 Act; and

22 (B) an agreement between the Secretary

23 and the County indemnifying the Government

24 of the United States from all liability of the

25 Government that arises from the property.
3

S 1510 RFH

1 (2) The lands conveyed by this Act shall be

2 used for public purposes. If such lands cease to be

3 used for public purposes, at the option of the United

4 States, such lands will revert to the United States.

5 (c) LAND WITHDRAWALS.—Land withdrawals under

6 Public Land Order 3730 and Executive Order 4599 as

7 extended in the Federal Register on May 25, 1989 (54

8 F.R. 22629) shall be revoked simultaneous with the con9 veyance of the property under subsection (a).

Passed the Senate July 17, 1998.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 155 (Monday, August 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 45709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-853]


Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh From Mexico: Antidumping Duty 
Order; Correction

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) published notice in the 
Federal Register of August 9, 2021, in which Commerce published the 
antidumping duty order on standard steel welded wire mesh from Mexico. 
This notice incorrectly described the scope of the investigation rather 
than the scope of the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Kinter or Alice Maldonado, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1413 or (202) 
482-4682, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of August 9, 2021, in FR Doc 2021-16982, on 
page 43526 in the second column, correct the section titled, 
``Appendix--Scope of the Investigation,'' to state, ``Appendix--Scope 
of the Order'' and ``The merchandise covered by this order . . .'' and 
on page 43527 in the second column, correct the following language to 
state, ``Merchandise subject to this order . . . the written 
description of the scope of this order is dispositive.''

Background

    On August 9, 2021, Commerce published in the Federal Register 
Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico: Antidumping Duty Order.\1\ 
We incorrectly described the scope of the investigation rather than the 
scope of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico: Antidumping 
Duty Order, 86 FR 43525 (August 9, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 
736(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.211(b).

    Dated: August 10, 2021.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2021-17465 Filed 8-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GLEN DECICCO and PAM STONE,

Appellants,

v.

MALLORY CREEK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-141

[March 1, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502019CA007052.

Glen A. DeCicco and Pamela Stone, Jupiter, pro se.

Therese A. Savona of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s dismissal of the Fifth Amended Complaint 

for failure to comply with the mediation requirement of section 720.311, 

Florida Statutes (2019). We do not reach the merits of any claim in that 

complaint.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Participation Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 NEXXUS LIGHTING, INC. 
 November 25, 2008 
 Mr. Brett M. Kingstone 
  

			
	Re:	  	Contingent Proceeds Participation Agreement between Brett M. Kingstone and Nexxus Lighting, Inc. dated September 19, 2003, as amended by letter agreement dated September 9, 2005
(the “Participation Agreement”)


 Dear Mr. Kingstone: 
 This letter, when countersigned by you, shall constitute an amendment to the Participation Agreement. 
 Section 11 of the Participation Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced with the following revised Section 11: 
 “11. Term; Survival. This term of this Agreement shall commence on the date first set forth above and terminate on December 31, 2011. Sections 4 and 9 shall survive the expiration, termination or cancellation of this
Agreement. In addition, the Corporation’s obligation to deliver Reimbursed Funds and pay the Proceeds Participation shall survive termination of this Agreement.” 
 Except as specifically amended hereby, the remaining terms and provisions of the Participation Agreement shall not be affected by this amendment and
shall remain in full force and effect. 
 If you are in agreement with this amendment, please sign and return one copy of this letter
agreement, which thereupon will constitute our agreement with respect to its subject matter. 
  

			
	Sincerely,
	
	NEXXUS LIGHTING, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John C. Oakley

		 	John C. Oakley, Chief Financial Officer


 Agreed and accepted as of this 25th day of November, 2008. 
  

	
	 /s/ Brett M. Kingstone

	Brett M. Kingstone