alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1633

To suspend through December 31, 1999, the duty on certain textile

machinery.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 11, 1998

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend through December 31, 1999, the duty on certain

textile machinery.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (a) Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized

4 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by insert5 ing in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.81.20 Other textile printing machinery

(provided for in

subheading

8443.59.10) .......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/99 ’’.

6 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

7 apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for
2

S 1633 IS

1 consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (c) Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of

4 1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper request

5 filed with the Customs Service within 180 days after the

6 date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal

7 from warehouse for consumption, of goods described in

8 subheading 8443.59.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Sched9 ule of the United States—

10 (1) which was made after December 31, 1997,

11 and before the date that is 15 days after the date

12 of the enactment of this Act, and

13 (2) with respect to which there would have been

14 no duty if the amendment made by subsection (a)

15 applied to such entry or withdrawal,

16 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment

17 applied to such entry or withdrawal.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-22-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                   0
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     47,500
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>              145,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    192,807
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         207,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               207,890
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          129,417
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               1,445
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               1,445
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         (144,500)
<NET-ASSETS>                      (15,083)
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                       0
<OTHER-INCOME>                        663
<EXPENSES-NET>                    (15,890)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>           (15,227)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>               0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             (15,227)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             1,445
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            (15,083)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               2,890
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                    15,890
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               (7,541)
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   0
<PER-SHARE-NII>                       (12)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                   (10)
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                         0
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to Investment Managers and Investors as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with 
the Operating Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### City of Tallapoosa *v.*Brock.

Hill, J.

1. “Save as to eases specially provided for by law (such as exception to the grant of an injunction, or the appointment of or refusal to appoint a receiver), no case can be brought to this court by bill of exceptions, so long as the same is pending in the court below, unless the decision complained of would have been a final disposition of the case, had it been rendered as the excepting party claims that it should have been.” *Baldwin*v. *Lowe,*129 *Ga.*711 (59 S. E. 772); Civil Code (1910), § 6138.

*600June 25, 1915.

Action for damages; from Haralson superior court.

*Lloyd Thomas*and *M. J. Head,*for plaintiff in error.

2. Where to a suit for damages the defendant filed several pleas in bar and abatement, only two of which — one of res adjudícala, and one based upon the ground that the present action was a renewal of one that had been withdrawn by ifiamtiif without having paid the costs or making a pauper affidavit of her inability so to do (Civil Code (1910), § 5625) — were passed upon by the trial judge, to whom, by agreement, the issues thus raised were submitted without the intervention of a jury, who found against the pleas, such judgment is not a final judgment that can be reviewed by direct bill of exceptions to this court. *Johnson*v. *Battle,*120 *Ga.*649 (48 S. E. 128) ; *Baldwin*v. *Lowe,*supra; *Johnson*v. *Merchants & Farmers Bank,*141 *Ga.*721 (81 S. E. 873).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Tuscarora Incorporated of our report dated October 6, 2000 included in the
Annual Report to Shareholders of Tuscarora Incorporated for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2000.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Tuscarora
Incorporated listed in Item 14(a)(2). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-35373 and 333-06111) pertaining to the 1989 Stock Incentive
Plan of Tuscarora incorporated; Form S-8 (No. 333-57833) pertaining to the 1997
Stock Incentive Plan of Tuscarora Incorporated; and Form S-8 (No. 333-35587)
pertaining to the Tuscarora Incorporated Common Stock Purchase Plan for Salaried
Employees of our report dated October 6, 2000 with respect to the financial
statements incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the
preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Tuscarora Incorporated.


/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
November 29, 2000
PAGE 1 – ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

WILLIAM DILLON, SCOTT GRAUE, and 

DAVID HODGES, individually, on behalf of 

a class of others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CLACKAMAS COUNTY and CRAIG 

ROBERTS, individually and in his official 

capacity as Sheriff of Clackamas County

Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-cv-00820-ST

ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued a Findings and 

Recommendation in this case on October 23, 2014. Dkt. 24. Judge Stewart recommended that 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part, with leave granted to 

Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. No party has filed objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act (“Act”), the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(C). If a party files objections to a magistrate’s findings and recommendations, “the 

Case 3:14-cv-00820-YY Document 28 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 2
PAGE 2 – ORDER

court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 

findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

If no party objects, however, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the 

Act], intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to which no objections 

are filed.”). Nor does the Act “preclude further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . 

under a de novo or any other standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. And the Advisory Committee 

Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court 

review the magistrate’s findings and recommendations for “clear error on the face of the record.”

As no party has made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory 

Committee and reviews Judge Stewart’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the 

face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Stewart’s 

Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 24. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. 9) is GRANTED 

in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint 

(Dkt. 19) is GRANTED, but Plaintiffs are ordered to file an amended complaint which complies 

with Judge Stewart’s rulings on Defendants’ motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 2d day of December, 2014.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-00820-YY Document 28 Filed 12/02/14 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARTINEZ ANTWON BOWENS, a/k/a Twon, a/k/a 

T-Money,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CR-98-380, CA-01-665)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martinez Antwon Bowens, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornell Wallace,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Martinez Antwon Bowens seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Bowens has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029

(2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



<TABLE>
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<CAPTION>

                                                                 YEAR ENDED        YEAR ENDED
                                                                DECEMBER 31,      DECEMBER 31,
                                                                   1996               1995
                                                                   ----               ----
<S>                                                           <C>                 <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding                    $ 12,513,000        $ 1,935,000

Effect of Convertible Preferred Stock - assumed                    ---              5,774,000
  converted at date of issuance

Effect of Common and Common equivalent Shares 
  issued by the Company during the twelve month 
  period immediately preceding the Company's 
  initial public offering in November 1995, as if 
  they were outstanding for all periods presented 
  prior to the initial public offering (using the
  treasury stock method)                                           ---                400,000
                                                              ------------        -----------

Shares used in computing net loss per share                     12,513,000          8,109,000

Net loss                                                      $(19,978,144)       $(6,884,645)
                                                              ============        ===========

Net loss per share                                            $      (1.60)       $      (.85)
                                                              ============        ===========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1510 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1510

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 1998

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to convey certain lands to the county of Rio Arriba, New 
                                Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OLD COYOTE ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.

    (a) Conveyance of Property.--Not later than one year after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior (herein ``the 
Secretary'') shall convey to the County of Rio Arriba, New Mexico 
(herein ``the County''), subject to the terms and conditions stated in 
subsection (b), all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to the land (including all improvements on the land) known as the 
``Old Coyote Administrative Site'' located approximately \1/2\ mile 
east of the Village of Coyote, New Mexico, on State Road 96, comprising 
one tract of 130.27 acres (as described in Public Land Order 3730), and 
one tract of 276.76 acres (as described in Executive Order 4599).
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--
            (1) Consideration for the conveyance described in 
        subsection (a) shall be--
                    (A) an amount that is consistent with the special 
                pricing program for Governmental entities under the 
                Recreation and Public Purposes Act; and
                    (B) an agreement between the Secretary and the 
                County indemnifying the Government of the United States 
                from all liability of the Government that arises from 
                the property.
            (2) The lands conveyed by this Act shall be used for public 
        purposes. If such lands cease to be used for public purposes, 
        at the option of the United States, such lands will revert to 
        the United States.
    (c) Land Withdrawals.--Land withdrawals under Public Land Order 
3730 and Executive Order 4599 as extended in the Federal Register on 
May 25, 1989 (54 F.R. 22629) shall be revoked simultaneous with the 
conveyance of the property under subsection (a).

            Passed the Senate July 17, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002


I, Keith A. Meister, President and Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of American
Property Investors, Inc., the General Partner of American Real
Estate Holdings Limited Partnership (the
Registrant), certify that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the American Real Estate
Holdings Limited Partnership, quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2004 of the Registrant
(the Report):



| |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                      
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



| |                     
| | --------------------
| | /s/ KEITH A. MEISTER
| |                     



| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Keith A. Meister                                     
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
    of         
| | American Property Investors, Inc.,                   
| | the General Partner of                               
| | American Real Estate Holdings Limited
    Partnership

Date: December 15, 2004
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:2
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:3
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:4
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:5
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:6
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:7
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:8
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:9
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:10
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:11
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:12
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/15/02 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,106
<SECURITIES>                                     5,832
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                       650
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,620
<PP&E>                                          12,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,085
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,785
<SALES>                                          7,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,145
<CGS>                                            2,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (42)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   123
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                       710
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       911
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
HAGLER BAILLY, INC. UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE]
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

</LEGEND>
                       
                      
                                
                               
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
                       
<CASH>                                         3,967,527
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,588,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,253,546
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               47,676,295
<PP&E>                                         6,001,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,084,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 61,872,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,533,693
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       90,513
<OTHER-SE>                                     45,227,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   61,872,653
<SALES>                                        97,807,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               97,807,750
<CGS>                                          73,106,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  73,106,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,097,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10,594,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,853,376
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,740,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2,335,598
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,076,287
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .95
        


</TABLE>
#### Arthur Weigold, Appellant-Respondent, v 478 Realty Associates et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Wallach, J.), entered on August 16, 1985, unanimously affirmed on the opinion of Richard Wallach, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur&emdash;Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Carro and Kassal, JJ.