alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
UNIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION


<CAPTION>
                                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                               MARCH 31,
                                                                      -------------------------
                                                                          2000          1999
                                                                      -----------    ----------
<S>                                                                   <C>            <C>
INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
   Net income (loss)                                                  $(1,216,545)   $  182,899
   Preferred dividends                                                         --            --
                                                                      -----------    ----------
   Income available to common
      stockholders                                                    $(1,216,545)   $  182,899
                                                                      ===========    ==========

CALCULATION OF COMMON STOCK
   Common shares outstanding at beginning
      of period                                                         2,869,862     2,267,449
   Shares issues re: acquisition of M. Wilson and Associates                   --        33,636
   Shares issued re: acquisition of Fully Armed Production                     --        18,182
   Shares issued re: acquisition of Commonwealth Investment Services           --        27,500
   Shares issued in private placement during period                         8,600         4,495
                                                                      -----------    ----------

      Common shares used in basic calculation                           2,878,462     2,351,262
                                                                      -----------    ----------
   Common stock equivalent of options                                     101,406         6,800
   Preferred stock Series C conversion in common stock                         --       100,713
                                                                      -----------    ----------

      Common shares used in fully diluted calculation                   2,979,868     2,458,775
                                                                      -----------    ----------

EARNINGS PER SHARE
   Basic                                                              $     (0.42)   $     0.08
                                                                      ===========    ==========
   Fully diluted                                                            (0.41)         0.07
                                                                      ===========    ==========
</TABLE>
# Eiropas Savienības C 199/2008

| | ISSN 1725-5201 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 199 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 51. sējums2008. gada 5. augusts |

ISSN 1725-5201

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 199

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

51. sējums2008. gada 5. augusts

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Rezolūcijas, ieteikumi un atzinumi |
| | ATZINUMI |
| | Revīzijas palāta |
| 2008/C 199/01 | Atzinums Nr. 3/2008 par priekšlikumu Padomes regulai, ar kuru groza Regulu (Euratom, EOTK, EEK) Nr. 549/69, ar ko nosaka Eiropas Kopienu ierēdņu un citu darbinieku kategorijas, uz kurām attiecas Protokola par privilēģijām un imunitāti Eiropas Kopienās 12. pants, 13. panta otrā daļa un 14. pants | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

I   Rezolūcijas, ieteikumi un atzinumi

ATZINUMI

Revīzijas palāta

2008/C 199/01

Atzinums Nr. 3/2008 par priekšlikumu Padomes regulai, ar kuru groza Regulu (Euratom, EOTK, EEK) Nr. 549/69, ar ko nosaka Eiropas Kopienu ierēdņu un citu darbinieku kategorijas, uz kurām attiecas Protokola par privilēģijām un imunitāti Eiropas Kopienās 12. pants, 13. panta otrā daļa un 14. pants

1

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

I Rezolūcijas, ieteikumi un atzinumi

ATZINUMI

Revīzijas palāta

| 5.8.2008 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2008

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 199/1

---

ATZINUMS Nr. 3/2008

par priekšlikumu Padomes regulai, ar kuru groza Regulu (Euratom, EOTK, EEK) Nr. 549/69, ar ko nosaka Eiropas Kopienu ierēdņu un citu darbinieku kategorijas, uz kurām attiecas Protokola par privilēģijām un imunitāti Eiropas Kopienās 12. pants, 13. panta otrā daļa un 14. pants

(2008/C 199/01)

EIROPAS KOPIENU REVĪZIJAS PALĀTA,

ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu un jo īpaši tā 248. panta 4. punktu un 291. pantu,

ņemot vērā Protokolu par privilēģijām un imunitāti Eiropas Kopienās un jo īpaši tā 16. pantu,

ņemot vērā Komisijas 2008. gada 23. maija priekšlikumu (1),

ņemot vērā Padomes lūgumu Palātai sniegt atzinumu par šo priekšlikumu (Palāta šo lūgumu saņēma 2008. gada 6. jūnijā),

tā kā Komisijas priekšlikuma mērķis ir panākt, lai Eiropola amatpersonām nebūtu imunitātes pret tiesvedību laikā, kad tās piedalās kopējās izmeklēšanas grupās, ko dalībvalstis izveidojušas saistībā ar Eiropola kompetencē esošu kriminālizmeklēšanu,

IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO ATZINUMU.

Palātai nav komentāru par ierosināto grozījumu, kurš paredz, ka Eiropola amatpersonām, kuras piedalās kopējās izmeklēšanas grupās, nav imunitātes pret tiesvedību.

Šo atzinumu Revīzijas palāta pieņēma 2008. gada 17. jūlija sēdē Luksemburgā.

Revīzijas palātas vārdā –

priekšsēdētājs

Vítor Manuel DA SILVA CALDEIRA

---

(1)  COM(2008) 305, 2008. gada 23. maija galīgā redakcija.

1

---
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1396

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to expand the School Breakfast

Program in elementary schools.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Mr. JOHNSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to expand the

School Breakfast Program in elementary schools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Meals for Achievement

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM.

7 Section 4(b)(1)(B) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966

8 (42 U.S.C. 1773(b)(1)(B)) is amended—

9 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘for each

10 free breakfast’’ and inserting ‘‘for each breakfast
2

•S 1396 IS

1 served in an elementary school and each free break2 fast served in a school other than an elementary

3 school’’;

4 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘served

5 in a school other than an elementary school’’ after

6 ‘‘reduced price breakfast’’; and

7 (3) in the third sentence, by inserting ‘‘in a

8 school other than an elementary school’’ after

9 ‘‘served’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Battle, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 362]

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed March 16, 2011, which, upon his conviction of robbery in the second degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of ammunition, imposed periods of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate terms of imprisonment previously imposed on July 2, 2001.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant had not yet completed the previously imposed terms of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to mandatory periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law *(see People v Lingle,*16 NY3d 621 [2011]; *People v Dawkins,*87 AD3d 550 [2011]; *People v Myrick,*84 AD3d 1272 [2011]). Rivera, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November                6, 2007 | /s/                ROBERT E. MEAD                   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                              | Robert                E. Mead                       |
|                                              | Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |

----
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference  of our report dated  December 22, 1999  included in this Form 10-KSB,
into  Bio-Imaging   Technologies,   Inc.  and  subsidiaries'   previously  filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-90412,  33-74152 and 33-22661)
and on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-75370 and 33-25477).



                                             /s/Arthur Andersen LLP
                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Roseland, New Jersey

December 22, 1999
#### OLIVER v. BRAUN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 31, 1896.)

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, unless terms of orders filed are complied with.
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 1 of 33 PageID #:50
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 2 of 33 PageID #:51
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 3 of 33 PageID #:52
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 4 of 33 PageID #:53
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 5 of 33 PageID #:54
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 6 of 33 PageID #:55
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 7 of 33 PageID #:56
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 8 of 33 PageID #:57
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 9 of 33 PageID #:58
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 10 of 33 PageID #:59
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 11 of 33 PageID #:60
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 12 of 33 PageID #:61
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 13 of 33 PageID #:62
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 14 of 33 PageID #:63
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 15 of 33 PageID #:64
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 16 of 33 PageID #:65
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 17 of 33 PageID #:66
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 18 of 33 PageID #:67
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 19 of 33 PageID #:68
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 20 of 33 PageID #:69
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 21 of 33 PageID #:70
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 22 of 33 PageID #:71
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 23 of 33 PageID #:72
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 24 of 33 PageID #:73
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 25 of 33 PageID #:74
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 26 of 33 PageID #:75
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 27 of 33 PageID #:76
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 28 of 33 PageID #:77
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 29 of 33 PageID #:78
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 30 of 33 PageID #:79
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 31 of 33 PageID #:80
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 32 of 33 PageID #:81
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 33 of 33 PageID #:82
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     consolidated   statements  of  financial  condition  and  the  consolidated
     statements of operation of Unified Financial Services, Inc. filed as a part
     of the  Company's  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such report.
</LEGEND>                                     
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   8,646,373
<SECURITIES>                                             1,543,173
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,633,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 2,041
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        11,102,603
<PP&E>                                                   1,444,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                             821,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          12,966,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2,588,718
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                210,000
<COMMON>                                                    18,748
<OTHER-SE>                                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            12,966,013
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         4,249,165
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              692,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         2,791,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          18,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            746,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                               (4,176)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        750,326
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               750,326
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.40
        

                                     
 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.53

AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE CARESTOCK
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Pursuant
to the powers of amendment reserved under Article Nine of the CareStock Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan"), as restated effective November 11, 1998, the Benefits
Committee, as authorized by the Board of Directors of Care mark Rx, Inc. hereby amends the Plan as follows:

1.

Section 2.11
of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the second sentence thereof in its entirety and by substituting the following in lieu thereof:



2.

Section 2.13
of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the same in its entirety and by substituting the following in lieu thereof:



3.

A
new Section 2.14 shall be added to Plan to read as follows, and all subsequent sections in Article II shall be re-numbered accordingly:



4.

Section 5.1
of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the same in its entirety and by substituting the following in lieu thereof:



5.

Section 5.3
of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the same in its entirety and by substituting the following in lieu thereof:



---

6.

Section 5.4
of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the first sentence thereof in its entirety and by substituting the following in lieu thereof:



7.

Section 5.5
of the Plan shall be amended by substituting "$885.00" for the amount "$800.00" in the second sentence thereof.

8.

Section 6.3
of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the same in its entirety and by substituting the following in lieu thereof:



9.

Section 6.4
of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the same in its entirety.

10.

Section 8.1
of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the first and second sentences thereof in their entirety and by substituting the following in lieu thereof:



*
* * *

The
effective date for items 1 through 8 and 10 in this Amendment Number Two shall be July 1, 2002. The effective date for item 9 shall be August 1,2002.

|        |  |                   |  | CAREMARK RX, INC.
|------- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------
|        |  |                   |  | /s/KIRK MCCONNELL
|ATTEST: |  | /s/MARION SWANSON |  | Date:            

---
LISA R. J. PORTER

JP Law PC

5200 SW Meadows Rd., Suite 150

Lake Oswego, OR 97035

(503) 245-6309

OSB NO. 025035

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

Penny Lee Powell,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-01899-JE

vs.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN ORDER GRANTING AWARD

COMMISSIONER of Social Security, OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES 

Defendant / COSTS

ORDER

Based upon the Plaintiff’s Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 

2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in

Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 it is hereby ordered that 

EAJA attorney’s fees of $5443.86 and expenses $10.76 and costs of $14.35, if not subject to any 

offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program as discussed in 

Ratliff shall be paid to the Plaintiff, and mailed to the attorney’s office.

Done this ______day of ________________, 2017.

__________________________________________

Judge

Presented by:

s/Lisa R.J. Porter_____________-

Lisa R.J. Porter, OSB 025035

Attorney for Plaintiff

5200 SW Meadows Rd., Suite 150

Lake Oswego, OR 97035

18th January

U.S. Magistrate

/s/ John Jelderks

Case 6:14-cv-01899-JE Document 25 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC, 

a California Limited Liability Company,

and DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC, a 

Texas Limited Liability Company,

No. 6:14-cv-01407-AC

 Plaintiffs, 

OPINION AND ORDER

v. 

PETER PECSOK, 

Defendant.

MOSMAN, J., 

On April 29, 2015, Magistrate Judge Acosta issued his Findings and Recommendation 

(F&R) [30], recommending that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees [26] in the amount of 

$3,276.00 and costs in the amount of $525.00 should be GRANTED. No objections to the 

Findings and Recommendation were filed.

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

1 – OPINION AND ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01407-AC Document 34 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 2
is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [30] 

as my own opinion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 24th day of June, 2015. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman______ 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge

2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-01407-AC Document 34 Filed 06/24/15 Page 2 of 2
#### City of Clarkesville *v.*McMillan.

April 16, 1915.

Action for damages. Before Judge Jones. Habersham superior court. February *12,*1914.

7. 77. *Sutton*and *J. C. Edwards & Sons,*for plaintiff in error.

*McMillan &*Erwin, contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. Where a city lawfully raises the grade of one of its streets, if the grading is executed in such manner as to obstruct or divert the flow of rain water so that it would empty on an adjacent proprietor’s land to such an extent as to cause injury thereto, the diversion of the water with such result would give rise to a cause of action. *Louisville & Nashville R. Co.*v. *Jackson,*139 *Ga.*543 (4), 544 (77 S. E. 796) ; *Nelson*v. *City of Atlanta,*138 *Ga.*252 (75 S. E. 245), and citations.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and none of the grounds of the motion for new trial show error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.2

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:04−cr−00778

Honorable Samuel Der−Yeghiayan

Witold Osinski, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, November 2, 2011:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Samuel Der−Yeghiayan as to Witold

Osinski: Sentencing held on 11/02/11. Judgment in a criminal case to follow. Mailed

notice (mw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:04-cr-00778 Document #: 671 Filed: 11/02/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2162