alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sugarbeet and Bean Research: East Lansing, MI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area East Lansing, Michigan Sugarbeet and Bean Research People & Locations







Hussien  Alameldin
                        Sugarbeet and Bean Research

                        




                        
                        Post Doc (Research Associate)
                        Phone: (517) 353-0210
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Hugh Maurice Allen WADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wenelisa NAVARRO, M.D.; Isaias Tessema, M.D.; Erwin Aldana, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-6387.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 19, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 24, 2011.

Hugh Maurice Allen Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina *636J. Dennis, Kramon *&*Graham, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hugh Maurice Allen Wade seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Because Wade is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2879, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). The record does not reveal when Wade gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing.’ Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1) and *Houston v. Lack.*The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

*REMANDED.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

CHRISTY R. GILMARTIN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner 

of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

JUDGMENT 

Civil No.6:14-cv-01417-AA 

Pursuant to the ORDER signed on September 15, 2015, this action is reversed and 

remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four 

of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) consistent with that ORDER. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

JUDGMENT 

Case 6:14-cv-01417-AA Document 24 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Rockmart Brick and Slate Company *v.*Williams Patent Crusher and Pulverizer Company.

June 22, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Edwards. Polk superior court. August 25, 1914.

*Mundy & Mundy*and *John K. Davis,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. W. Mundy,*contra.

Hill, J.

The undisputed facts of this ease, as divulged by the pleadings, bring it within the principles of law ruled in *Malsby*v. *Young,*104 *Ga.*205, 212 (30 S. E. 854), *McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.*v. *Allison,*116 *Ga.*445 (42 S. E. 778), and similar cases, so as to show a binding acceptance of the machinery sold subject to approval, and a waiver of any right to object to alleged defects therein, and consequent liability to pay therefor in accordance with the contract of sale. The court, therefore, did not err in dismissing, on general demurrer, the answer of the defendant, nor in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the amount due under the contract.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1542

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on Butanamide,

2,2′-[1-2,-ethanediylbis(oxy-2,1-phenyleneazo)]bis[N-(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-3-oxo-.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on

Butanamide, 2,2′-[1-2,-ethanediylbis(oxy-2,1-phenyleneazo)]bis[N-(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-3-

oxo-.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1542 IS

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BUTANAMIDE, 2,2′-[1-

2 2,-ETHANEDIYLBIS(OXY-2,1-PHENYLENEAZO)]

3 BIS[N-(2,3-DIHYDRO-2-OXO-1H-BENZIMIDAZOL4 5-YL)-3-OXO-.

5 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:

‘‘ 9902.32.XX Butanamide, 2,2′-

[1-2,-

ethanediylbis(oxy2,1-phenyleneazo)

]bis[N-(2,3-

dihydro-2-oxo-1Hbenzimidazol-5-yl)-

3-oxo- provided for

in subheading

3204.17.60 ............ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re10 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

11 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

12 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1559 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1559

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the design, construction, furnishing, and equipping of a 
  Center for Historically Black Heritage within Florida A&M University.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF A CENTER FOR REGIONAL BLACK CULTURE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
        (1) Currently 500,000 historically important artifacts of the 
    Civil War era and the early days of the civil rights movement in 
    the Southeast region of the United States are housed at Florida A&M 
    University.
        (2) To preserve this large repository of African-American 
    history and artifacts it is appropriate that the Federal Government 
    share in the cost of construction of this national repository for 
    culture and history.
    (b) Definition.--In this section:
        (1) Center.--The term ``Center'' means the Center for 
    Historically Black Heritage at Florida A&M University.
        (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
    the Interior acting through the Director of the National Park 
    Service.
    (c) Construction of Center.--The Secretary may award a grant to the 
State of Florida to pay for the Federal share of the cost, design, 
construction, furnishing, and equipping of the Center at Florida A&M 
University.
    (d) Grant Requirements.--
        (1) In general.--In order to receive a grant awarded under 
    subsection (c), Florida A&M University, shall submit to the 
    Secretary a proposal.
        (2) Federal share.--The Federal share described in subsection 
    (c) shall be 50 percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this section 
a total of $3,800,000 for fiscal year 1998 and any succeeding fiscal 
years. Funds appropriated pursuant to the authority of the preceding 
sentence shall remain available until expanded.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
|   | 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |     /s/      Raymond R. Brandstrom |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Raymond      R. Brandstrom                             |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer                           |
|   | March      17, 2008                                    |
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 18, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 46253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than September 17, 
2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Erien O. Terry, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1e0d1d1cdc8c2c0d5c8cecfd28fe2ceccccc4cfd5d2e1c0d5cd8fc7d3c38fced3c6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="175667677b7e7476637e7879643954787a7a727963645776637b3971657539786570">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Lafayette Banking Company, Mayo, Florida; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring Lafayette State Bank, Mayo, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 13, 
2021.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-17732 Filed 8-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

TRIVONNE JAY BARNETT, Case No. 6:14-cv-01471-YY 

ORDER 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JEFF PREMO, 

Respondent. 

Aiken, Judge: 

Magistrate Judge You issued Findings and Recommendation in the above-captioned 

cases, recommending that petition for habeas corpus relief be denied and the case dismissed. The 

matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either 

patty objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district 

comt must make a de novo determination of that po1tion of the magistrate judge's repmi. 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 

1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. 

Upon de novo review, I find no error and agree that petitioner failed to establish that the state 

1 -ORDER 

Case 6:14-cv-01471-YY Document 62 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 2
court decision regarding prosecutorial misconduct was contrary to or an umeasonable application 

of clearly established federal law. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge You's Findings and 

Recommendation (doc. 55) is ADOPTED with respect to the denial of the petition. The Petition 

and (doc. 2) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED. 

I decline to adopt the Findings and Recommendation with respect to the certificate of 

appealability. A cettificate of appealability is granted as to the issue of prosecutorial misconduct. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

ITIS SO ORDERED. fo: 1 , A/ Sf} (('.}J'vl·z11/vvr 

Dated this -1:'.:_ day of ~ary;-2017. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

2 -ORDER 

Case 6:14-cv-01471-YY Document 62 Filed 02/01/17 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1532 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1532

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 21, 1998

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 to deauthorize the 
        remainder of the project at East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEAUTHORIZATION OF REMAINDER OF PROJECT AT EAST BOOTHBAY 
              HARBOR, MAINE.

    Section 364 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3731) is amended by striking paragraph (9) and inserting the 
following:
            ``(9) East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.--The project for 
        navigation, East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the 
        first section of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
        appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation 
        of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
        purposes'', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 657).''.

            Passed the Senate June 9, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 12, 2017

s0906

Order 

Clerk

September 12, 2017

153957

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153957

COA: 331229

Wayne CC: 11-011795-FC

TIMOTHY EUGENE SAMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2016 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| ** **                                   | ** ** | **State or Other Jurisdiction of** |
|----------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|
| **Name of Subsidiary**                       | ** ** | **Incorporation or Organization**  |
| ** **                                   | ** ** | ** **                         |
| **Laboratorios  Belmac S.A.**                | ** ** | **Spain**                          |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Laboratorios  Davur S.L.**                 | ** ** | **Spain**                          |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Laboratorios  Rimafar S.L.**               | ** ** | **Spain**                          |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Bentley  A.P.I. S.L.**                     | ** ** | **Spain**                          |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Bentley  Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited** | ** ** | **Ireland**                        |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Pharma  de Espana, Inc.**             | ** ** | **State  of Delaware**             |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Bentley  Park, LLC**                       | ** ** | **State  of Delaware**             |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Bentley  Healthcare Corporation**          | ** ** | **State  of Florida**              |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Belmac  Health Corporation**               | ** ** | **State  of Florida**              |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Belmac  Hygiene, Inc.**               | ** ** | **State  of Florida**              |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Belmac  Holdings, Inc.**              | ** ** | **State  of Florida**              |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Belmac  A.I., Inc.**                  | ** ** | **State  of Florida**              |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **B.O.G.  International Finance, Inc.** | ** ** | **State  of Florida**              |
|                                         |       |                               |
| **Belmac  Jamaica, Ltd.**                    | ** ** | **Jamaica**                        |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
audited Balance Sheet as of August 31, 2000 and the audited Statement
of Operations for the year then ended and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                    103,607
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                              23,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                               102,694
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          284,535
<PP&E>                                     40,712
<DEPRECIATION>                             27,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            347,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,167,751
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                3,319,030
<OTHER-SE>                             (6,139,562)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              347,219
<SALES>                                   142,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          142,324
<CGS>                                      72,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           2,107,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        125,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (2,090,626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (2,090,626)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           (2,090,626)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.13)


</TABLE>
#### Atm Magfoor Rahman SARKAR; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-74106.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 21, 2011.

Elsa Ines Martinez, Esquire, Law Offices of Elsa Martinez, PLC, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

OIL, Dara Smith, Trial, David V. Ber-nal, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Atm Magfoor Rahman Sarkar and his family, natives and citizens of Bangladesh, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceed*208ings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to reopen because they presented insufficient evidence to establish prejudice from the alleged ineffective assistance of their former counsel. *See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft,*339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir.2003) (presumption of prejudice rebutted where petitioner has not demonstrated plausible grounds of relief).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.