alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           521,476
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 521,476
<CASH>                                          85,281
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          13,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 757,290
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 97,942
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             83,119
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                        15,179
<OTHER-SE>                                     411,874<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   757,290
<PREMIUMS>                                     147,501
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             34,288
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               5,575
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      63
<BENEFITS>                                      95,539
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     22,661
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            11,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,232
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,232
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.80
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0<F1>
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0<F1>
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0<F1>
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0<F1>
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0<F1>
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0<F1>
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0<F1>
<FN> 
<F1> Amounts for Securities Act Industry Guide 6 and Exchange Act Industry
     Guide & disclosures are not provided because the Company's loss reserves do
     not exceed one half of the consolidated common shareholders equity.

<F2> Includes minority interest.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10


EXHIBIT 10.60




Description of Oral Extension-D. Hough Promissory Note




Summary of Terms of the Orally Agreed upon Extension to following Simple Promissory Note (with corresponding exhibit number of original note) under which Registrant is the Borrower. No periodic payments are required and principal and interest are due on the extended due date.







	Original

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Note

	 
	 
	Original

	Oral

	 
	Annual


	Exhibit

	 
	Loan

	Due

	Extension

	 
	%


	Number

	Lender

	Date

	Date

	Date

	Principal

	Rate


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	10.30

	D. Hough

	09/15/2008

	12/15/2008

	12/31/2008

	$7,500.00

	10%
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2294

_____________________________

SHANE MICHAEL BERGIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

W. Joel Boles, Judge.

January 10, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Shane Michael Bergin, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Germplasm Resources Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    References
                        Plant Inventory Books
                                    Atlas of Guatamalan Crop Wild Relatives
                    NewsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center National Germplasm Resources Laboratory People & Locations







Laura  Gu
                        National Germplasm Resources Laboratory

                        




                        
                        IT Specialist
                        Phone: (301) 504-5699
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-02-314-CR

MONICA ROBINSON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Monica Robinson appeals her life sentence for the murder of Michael Hewitt.  Appellant pleaded guilty, but claimed during the punishment phase of the trial that the murder was mitigated due to sudden passion.2  In this appeal, she contends in a single issue that the trial court abused its discretion by limiting her cross-examination of a witness during the punishment phase about her previous relationship with the victim, to show that the victim was a Crip gang member who had physically abused appellant.  We will affirm.

	The parties are familiar with the facts of this case and the applicable law is well-settled.

	The applicable provisions of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure state that:

	In all prosecutions for murder, the state or the defendant shall be permitted to offer testimony as to all relevant facts and circumstances surrounding the killing and the previous relationship existing between the accused and the deceased, together with all relevant facts and circumstances going to show the condition of the mind of the accused at the time of the offense. 

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 38.36(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004). 

	Contrary to appellant’s claims, the record reflects that the trial court did not limit appellant’s attorney from cross-examining the witness about appellant’s previous relationship with the deceased, or the deceased’s gang affiliation.  We overrule appellant’s point. 

	The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

								JOHN CAYCE

								CHIEF JUSTICE

PANEL A:	CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 22, 2004
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cattle Fever Tick Research Unit: Kerrville, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Kerrville, Texas Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory Cattle Fever Tick Research Unit People & Locations







Michael Gene Moses

(Mike)
                        Cattle Fever Tick Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician (Insects)
                        Phone: (956) 205-7625
                        
                        
                        Fax: (956) 205-7639(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Summary of Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10(f) 
 Cabot Corporation 
 Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
 Cash compensation for Cabot’s non-employee directors consists of the following: 
  

	 	•	 	 An annual retainer of $31,000 for each non-employee director. 


  

	 	•	 	 An annual retainer of $21,000 for serving on the Audit Committee. 


  


	 	•	 	 An annual retainer of $7,000 for serving on each of the Compensation, Safety Health & Environmental Affairs, or Governance and Nominating Committees.



  

	 	•	 	 An annual retainer of $110,000 for serving as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. 


  

	 	•	 	 An annual retainer of $40,000 for serving as Chair of the Audit Committee. 


  

	 	•	 	 An annual retainer of $10,000 for serving as Chair of the Compensation, Safety Health & Environmental Affairs, or Governance and Nominating Committees.



 In addition to the cash compensation discussed above, under Cabot’s Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Compensation
Plan (the “Directors’ Stock Plan”), each non-employee director is entitled to receive 2,500 shares of Cabot common stock as a portion of his or her compensation for services performed in the calendar year, subject to increase or
decrease at the discretion of the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Directors’ Stock Plan calls for the shares to be issued on the date of the Board’s meeting in January. Cabot’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require
non-employee directors to have equity ownership in Cabot in the range of six times their annual cash retainer. It is expected that this ownership interest will generally be achieved within a three-to-five year period beginning when a director
is first elected to the Board. In addition, where equity-based compensation is a component of compensation, each non-employee director is required to retain the shares granted in any given year for a period of three years from the date of
issuance or until the director’s earlier retirement. 
 Directors also are reimbursed for travel expenses incurred for attending Board
and Committee meetings and are covered by Cabot’s travel accident insurance policy for such travel.
___________ No. 95-2044

___________ Ethyel M. Clark, widow of * Walter Clark, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for review of an v. * Order of the * Benefits Review Board. Director, Office of Workers' * Compensation Programs, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: April 1, 1996 Filed: April 4, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________
PER CURIAM. Ethyel M. Clark, widow of Walter E. Clark, requested modification of
a prior d enial of benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C
. §§ 901-962 (1988) (the Act). An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied her request, the Benefits Review Board (BRB) affirme d the ALJ, and this appeal followed. We affirm.

We pre viously affirmed the denial of benefits under the Act i n connection with a cla im filed in 1980 by Clark's husband and a survivor's cla imClark filed in 1984 after her husband died of colon cancer wit h metastasi s. See Clark v. Director, OWCP , 917 F.2d 374 (8th Cir. 1990)
. In her modification proceeding under 20 C.F.R. § 725.310 (1995), Clar k submitted as new evidence two medical reports on her late husband' s condition.

### Moreover, Clark has presented nothing to rebut the evidence 1 

### showing that her husband died of colon cancer with metastasis. Clark , 917 F.2d at 375 (for successful survivor's claim, miner's death must be attributable to pneumoconiosis). -2- Our revie w "is limited to an evaluation of whether the decisions of the ALJ and [BRB] are `rational, supported by substantial evidence an d consi stent with applicable law.'" Clark , 917 F.2d at 376 (quoted cas e omitted). We conclude, after reviewing the record as a whole, that th e refusal to modify the prior denial of benefits i s supported by substantial evidence.

The ALJ n oted that one of the medical reports did not address th e issue of disability. See Barnes v. ICO Corp , 31 F.3d 678, 680 (8th Cir. 1994) (claimant must prove total disability caused at least in part b y pneumo coniosis, and arising out of coal-mine employment). The secon d rep ort, written in 1992, contained the conclusion of Dr. Rasmussen tha t Clark's hu sband had been disabled due to coal-mine work, based on hi s sixteen years of coal -mine employment and an X-ray report showing scarred lungs. The ALJ found, among other things, that Dr. Rasmussen's conclusion was unreasoned and failed to discuss the evidenc e upon which it was based. The repor t also is contradicted by a prior report from the same doctor
. See Risher v. OWCP , 940 F.2d 327, 331 (8th Cir. 1991) (ALJ may disregard medical opinion that does not adequately explain basis for its conclusion) ; Clark , 917 F.2d at 37 6 (second opinion was contradicted by first, and was not sufficiently docu mented by new studies). As to the survivor's claim,
we previously upheld the ALJ's finding that Clark abandoned that claim , rejecting her content ion that it merged with her husband's claim. Clark , 917 F.2d at 375 & n.2. 1
Accordingly, we affirm.

### -3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil and Water Management Research: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Soil and Water Management Research People & Locations







Forrest E Goodman
                        Soil and Water Management Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Research Technician
                        Phone: (612) 625-8268
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)
                            **Publications**
                                                (Clicking on the reprint icon
                                                    Reprint Icon
                                                    will take you to the publication reprint.)Remote sensing of an agricultural soil moisture network in Walnut Creek, Iowa

- (Abstract Only)Cosh, M.H., Prueger, J.H., Goodman, F.E., Jackson, T.J. 2009. Remote sensing of an agricultural soil moisture network in Walnut Creek, Iowa [abstract]. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting Supplements. 90(52):H54D-02.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of Metropolitan New York Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, Respondent, v Norman David et al., Appellants.

[943 NYS2d 476]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered on or about October 25, 2011, which granted the petition to transfer certain real property pursuant to Religious Corporations Law § 12 and Not-For-Profit Corporation Law § 511, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The dismissal of the prior action in Supreme Court, Kings County, challenging the validity of the application of synodic administration to the church in question bars the objections to the instant petition, pursuant to the doctrine of judicata *(see Gramatan Home Invs. Corp. v Lopez,*46 NY2d 481, 485 [1979]). Moreover, petitioner’s determination that the congregation had become so diminished and scattered that it could no longer function is a nonjusticiable religious determination *(see Episcopal Diocese of Rochester v Harnish,*11 NY3d 340 [2008]).

Were we to consider their argument on its merits, we would find that objectors failed to demonstrate the unconstitutionality of Religious Corporations Law § 17-c (“Property of Lutheran congregations”) beyond a reasonable doubt *(see Matter of Schultz Mgt. v Board of Stds. & Appeals of City of N.Y.,*103 AD2d 687, 689 [1984], *affd*64 NY2d 1057 [1985]). The statute’s reference to a congregation’s inability to fulfill its purpose, which permits the synod having jurisdiction over it to take control of the congregation’s property *(see*Religious Corporations Law § 17-c [2] [a] [iii]), is not impermissibly vague. The constitution of the congregation in question amplifies the purpose, tying it to the conduct of worship services and the provision of pastoral care. These areas are both governed by petitioner in its discretion; it is for petitioner to determine whether the order of service is “evangelical Lutheran” and to appoint pastors to an approved list. Thus, the congregation is *420not subject to any rules other than those to which it subscribed. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Renwick and Richter, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10923

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ahmad Rashard Byrd, Jr.,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:19-CR-19-1

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ahmad Rashard Byrd, Jr., has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Byrd has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 11, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10923 Document: 00515973786 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2021
No. 20-10923

2

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-10923 Document: 00515973786 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2021