alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
             
 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HAGLER
  BAILLY, INC. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
 ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998                     
<CASH>                                         7,560,450
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  70,052,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,247,015
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               85,606,682
<PP&E>                                         19,463,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                 12,823,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,050,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,538,071
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       162,101
<OTHER-SE>                                     71,350,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,050,739
<SALES>                                        132,082,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,082,424
<CGS>                                          94,812,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  94,812,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             321,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,344,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,008,042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,336,336
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,336,336
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.36
        


</TABLE>
## NUMBER 13
- 20
- 003 52
- C R

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRIST I

– EDINBURG

LESSLIE TRENELLE LAMAR A/K/A LESSLIE LAMAR , A ppellant,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

On appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
Appellant Lesslie Trenelle Lamar a/k/a Lesslie Lamar f iled a notice of appeal from

an order issued in trial court cause number 19

- 05

- 31530A in the 24 th District Court of Victoria County, Texas. The June 18, 2020 order subject to appeal denies appellant ’ s
motion to recuse the Honorable Eli Garza

. On August 11, 2020, and again on November2 25, 2020, t he Clerk of this Court notified appellant that, based upon our review of the filings, there was no final
, appealable order. We requested appellant to correct this defect, if possible, and notified appellant that the appeal would be subject to dismissal if the

defect was not corrected. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1

. Appellant did not correct the defect

or otherwise respond to the Court ’ s directive s

. Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v.

State , 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); Skillern v. State , 355 S.W.3d 262, 266 (Te x. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, pet. ref ’ d) ; Saliba v. State , 45 S.W.3d 329 , 329 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2001, no pet.) ; McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to th is general rule include: (1) certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State , 942 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to reduce bond, T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
31.1; McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals from the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1998, no pet.);

McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161. See generally Saliba , 45 S.W.3d at 329 ; Bridle v. State , 16
S.W.3d 906, 908 n.1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2000, no pet.)

. As applicable to this case,

a n order denying a motion to recuse may be reviewed only on appeal from the final
judgment. See Green v. State , 374 S.W.3d 434, 445 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) ; see also De Leon v. Aguilar
, 127 S.W.3d 1, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (“ The procedures for recusal of judges set out in Rule 18a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure apply in criminal cases. ”). The Court, having examined and fully considered the notice of appeal, the record,

and the a pplicable law, is of the opinion that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.3 Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief and we

dismiss this appeal for la ck of jurisdiction

.

LETICIA HINOJOSA J u stice

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 4th day of February, 2021.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of First Commonwealth, Inc. as of September
30, 1996, and for the nine months then ended, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         10,820
<SECURITIES>                                    3,015
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                      231
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               18,704
<PP&E>                                          3,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,725
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            4
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,076
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               31,578
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   81
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,412
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,034
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.57



</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Warmwater Aquaculture Research Unit: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Warmwater Aquaculture Research Unit People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- ARS News Articles

Geoffrey C Waldbieser

(Geoff)    Research Molecular Biologist We have developed and now use DNA-based identification of catfish to produce pedigreed research populations. Identification of catfish individuals and families permits co-culture at an early age, and this reduces environmental effects that confound estimates of genetic potential. We have also sequenced the channel and blue catfish genomes to aid the identification of genetic variation throughout the genomes. We have genotyped Delta Select catfish for ~50,000 single nucleotide variants throughout the genome to improve the accuracy of estimated breeding values of Delta Select broodstock. We also collaborate with microbiologists on genome-based analyses to better understand the beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms that affect catfish production.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of Mary Vining Brassel (Admitted as Mary M. Vining), Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

May 12, 1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Robert H. Straus (Leslie S. Evans*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Cawse & Birmingham (Richard F. Birmingham*of counsel), for respondent.

*98OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this court on March 31, 1943, under the name of Mary M. Vining. In this proceeding to discipline the respondent, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and the respondent cross-moves to confirm in part and disaffirm in part said report.

The respondent was charged in this proceeding with professional misconduct in that she neglected an estate matter entrusted to her to the prejudice of the estate beneficiaries. The Special Referee sustained this charge and found that after the respondent was retained in 1979 she failed to take steps to promptly resolve an estate matter, and that even considering the respondent’s efforts to sell certain estate real property and to trace the family tree, the six-year period from June 1979, when the respondent was retained, to June 1985, when letters testamentary were issued, was an inordinate period of time.

After a review of all of the evidence, we are in full agreement with the report of the Referee. The respondent is guilty of the professional misconduct set forth above. The petitioner’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee is granted and the respondent’s cross motion is denied to the extent that it seeks to disaffirm said report in part.

In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed, we have taken into consideration the respondent’s more than 42 years of practice as well as the fact that the delay in the estate matter was not deliberate nor was it for personal gain. On the other hand, the respondent has received letters of admonition and caution in the past for similar neglect of legal matters. Under these circumstances, a formal sanction is required. Accordingly, the respondent should be, and hereby is, censured for her misconduct.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00508-CV

Annabelle Lopez

v.

Nayely Herrera

On Appeal from the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-1681-20-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 9, 2024
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1424

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the air transportation

tax changes made by the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 7, 1997

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. INOUYE)

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify

the air transportation tax changes made by the Taxpayer

Relief Act of 1997.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATIONS TO AIR TRANSPORTATION TAX

4 CHANGES MADE BY TAXPAYER RELIEF ACT

5 OF 1997.

6 (a) ELIMINATION OF INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR

7 TAX ON CERTAIN USE OF INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL FA8 CILITIES.—Section 4261(e)(4) of the Internal Revenue
2

•S 1424 IS

1 Code of 1986 (relating to inflation adjustment of dollar

2 rates of tax) is amended—

3 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘each dol4 lar amount contained in subsection (c)’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘the $12.00 amount contained in subsection

6 (c)(1)’’, and

7 (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ‘‘the

8 dollar amounts contained in subsection (c)’’ and in9 serting ‘‘the $12.00 amount contained in subsection

10 (c)(1)’’.

11 (b) MODIFICATION OF RURAL AIRPORT DEFINI12 TION.—Subclause (I) of section 4261(e)(1)(B) of the In13 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining rural airport) is

14 amended by inserting ‘‘(or is so located but is not con15 nected to such other airport by paved roads)’’ after

16 ‘‘clause (i)’’.

17 (c) IMPOSITION OF TICKET TAX ON SEGMENTS TO

18 AND FROM ALASKA OR HAWAII OR WITHIN ALASKA OR

19 HAWAII AT RATE IN EFFECT BEFORE THE TAXPAYER

20 RELIEF ACT OF 1997.—Section 4261(e) of the Internal

21 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules) is amend22 ed by adding at the end the following:

23 ‘‘(6) SEGMENTS TO AND FROM ALASKA OR HA24 WAII OR WITHIN ALASKA OR HAWAII.—Except with

25 respect to any domestic segment described in para-
3

•S 1424 IS

1 graph (1), in the case of transportation involving 1

2 or more domestic segments at least 1 of which be3 gins or ends in Alaska or Hawaii or in the case of

4 a domestic segment beginning and ending in Alaska

5 or Hawaii—

6 ‘‘(A) subsection (a) shall be applied by

7 substituting ‘‘10 percent’’ for the otherwise ap8 plicable percentage, and

9 ‘‘(B) the tax imposed by subsection (b)(1)

10 shall not apply.’’.

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

12 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend13 ments made by section 1031 of the Taxpayer Relief Act

14 of 1997.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 2.5

Eastern Division

Litertronics International, Inc., et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:03−cv−05733

Hon. Wayne R. Andersen

Technical Consumer Products, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, December 1, 2005:

 MINUTE entry before Judge Wayne R. Andersen :Status hearing held on

12/1/2005 and continued to 1/12/2006 at 09:00 AM.Mailed notice(tsa, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 85 Filed: 12/01/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:344
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1434 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1434

   To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a certain chemical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 1997

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a certain chemical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new item:

      

``    9902.32.50     Benzenesulfonic                                                                            
                      acid, 4-chloro-3-                                                                         
                      nitro-,                                                                                   
                      potassium salt                                                                            
                      (CAS No. 6671-49-                                                                         
                      4) (provided for                                                                          
                      in subheading                                                                             
                      2904.90.47.00)..  Free              No change        No change        On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/2000            
                                                                                                              ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Biological Control of Pests Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Biological Control of Pests Research People & Locations







Alsha  Barksdale
                        Biological Control of Pests Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (662) 686-3660
                        
                        
                        Fax: (662) 686-5281(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Revised 03/11/2008

Case Number: Assigned/Issued By:

Judge Name: Designated Magistrate Judge:

FEE INFORMATION

Amount Due: $350.00 $39.00 $5.00

IFP No Fee Other _____________

 $455.00

 

Number of Service Copies ___________ Date: ______________________

(For use by Fiscal Department Only)

Amount Paid: _______________ Receipt #: __________________

Date Payment Rec’d: _____________ Fiscal Clerk: ________________

ISSUANCES

Summons Alias Summons

Third Party Summons Lis Pendens

Non Wage Garnishment Summons Abstract of Judgment

___________________________

 Wage-Deduction Garnishment Summons ___________________________

 (Victim, Against and $ Amount)

 Citation to Discover Assets

 Other

Writ _______________________ _______________________

 (Type of Writ) _______________________

(Type of issuance)

 ______Original and __________ copies on ________________ as to ____________________________

 (Date)

 ____________________________________________________________________________________

 ____________________________________________________________________________________

Case: 1:04-cr-00778 Document #: 674 Filed: 11/15/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2170