alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
23.1


CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8  (Nos. 333-39055, 333-43934, 333-51229, 333-58522, 333-122387,
333-156807 and 333-166927) of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation of our reports
dated August 31, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements,
financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting (which expresses an adverse opinion on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses), which
appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/
      Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.San
      Jose, CaliforniaAugust
      31, 2010
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted), Emile
Loria, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Epimmune Inc. (the "Company"), and
Robert De Vaere, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 1. The Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, to which this
Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Annual Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Annual
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.

Dated:      April 21, 2004

/s/ Emile Loria                           /s/ Robert De Vaere
------------------------------            ------------------------------------
Emile Loria, M.D.                         Robert De Vaere
President and Chief Executive Officer     Vice President, Finance and
                                          Administration and Chief Financial
                                          Officer
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 40386 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Alvaro Jimenez Arguelles,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 203

- 9

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *

The attorney appointed to represent Alvaro Jimenez Arguelles has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arguelles has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 9, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40386 Document: 00515970169 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2021No. 20

- 40386

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appe llate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 20-40386 Document: 00515970169 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 2.4

Eastern Division

Roger Fairley, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:03−cv−05207

Hon. Ruben Castillo

Dennis Andrews, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, May 3, 2005:

 MINUTE entry before Judge Ruben Castillo :Plaintiffs' motion to compel

production of Pettiford deposition transcripts [219] is voluntarily withdrawn. Plaintiffs'

motion to compel depositions of defendants Fermaint and Bercasio and for sanctions

[221] is granted. The depositions of defendants Fermaint and Bercasio are to take place

before the Field trial begins.Judicial staff mailed notice(rao, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:03-cv-05207 Document #: 223 Filed: 05/03/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1798
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Improvement and Protection Research: Salinas, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Salinas, California Crop Improvement and Protection Research People & Locations







Michelle  Soule
                        Crop Improvement and Protection Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (831) 755-2830
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### C. A. HILL v. TOWNSHIP OF TIONESTA.

APPEAL BY DEPENDANT PROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP POREST COUNTY.

Argued October 9, 1889 — Reversed at Bar.

A justice of the peace has no jurisdiction in an action against a township for the negligence of its officers in failing to keep a public highway in repair, and the want of it may be shown as error in the Supreme Court, after the trial of an appeal in the Court of Common Pleas, where the question of jurisdiction was not raised.

Before Paxson, C. J., Sterrett, Green, Clark, Williams and Mitchell, JJ.

No. 63 October Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 43 May Term 1888, C. P.

On May 8, 1888, an appeal was filed in the Court of Common Pleas from the judgment of a justice of the peace in an action by C. A. Hill against Tionesta township. The paper books did not show by which party the appeal was taken. On August 6, 1888, the plaintiff filed a statement of claim for $200 damages, *526accruing to him in consequence of the neglect of the defendant township to keep a certain highway in repair. The defendant pleaded not guilty.

At the trial on December 17, 1888, it was made to appear that on December 26, 1887, the plaintiff, by an employee, was driving a loaded wagon drawn by two horses upon a certain public highway which ran along a river bank, upon one side, and the track of a railroad company on the other. The horse on the side of the river bank fell into a deep rut in the traveled roadway, and when loosened from the other rolled over the bank and was injured.

The question of jurisdiction was not raised, and the cause being submitted to the jury, upon the evidence, Brown, P. J., the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $95. Judgment having been entered on the verdict, the defendant took this appeal, specifying that the court erred, inter alia:

8. In entertaining jurisdiction of the cause, and entering judgment for the plaintiff.

*Mr. 0. Heydrich*(with him *Mr. T. F. Ritchey*and *Mr. Oarl I. Heydrich'),*for the appellant.

Counsel cited: Deihm v. Snell, 119 Pa. 316; Collins v. Collins, 37 Pa. 387; McKee v. Sanford, 25 Pa. 105; Stearly’s App., 3 Gr. 270; Ketland v. The Cassius, 2 Dall. 368.

*Mr. F. L. Davis,*for the appellee, was not heard.

Upon the point of concurrent jurisdiction, the brief filed cited: Section 1, act of July 7,1879, P. L. 194.

Per Curiam:

On the argument at Bar,

Judgment reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 270 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 270

Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Life Insurance Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2011

   Mr. Nelson of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Nelson of 
Florida, and Mr. Isakson) submitted the following resolution; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

                            October 12, 2011

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Life Insurance Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas the vast majority of people in the United States recognize that life 
        insurance is important to protecting their loved ones;
Whereas the life insurance industry pays approximately $60,000,000,000 to 
        beneficiaries each year, providing a tremendous source of financial 
        relief and security to families that experience the loss of a loved one;
Whereas, as of the date of agreement to this resolution, the unfortunate reality 
        is that approximately 95,000,000 adults in the United States have no 
        life insurance, and ownership of both individual and employer-sponsored 
        life insurance has declined in recent years;
Whereas life insurance products protect against the uncertainties of life by 
        enabling individuals and families to manage the financial risks of 
        premature death, disability, and long-term care;
Whereas individuals, families, and businesses can benefit from professional 
        insurance and financial planning advice, including an assessment of 
        their life insurance needs; and
Whereas numerous groups supporting life insurance have designated September 2011 
        as ``National Life Insurance Awareness Month'' as a means to encourage 
        consumers to become more aware of their life insurance needs, seek 
        advice from qualified insurance professionals, and take the actions 
        necessary to achieve financial security for their loved ones: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National Life 
        Insurance Awareness Month''; and
            (2) calls on the Federal Government, States, localities, 
        schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and the people of 
        the United States to observe the month with appropriate 
        programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      13.1





Credicorp
      Ltd.


Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18
      U.S.C. Section 1350)





Pursuant
      to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
      follows:





1.
            I
                am the Chairman Executive Officer of Credicorp Ltd. (the
                “Company”).





2.
            To
                my knowledge:





(A)  The
      Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006
      accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(B)  The
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      October 3, 2008




/s/
                DIONISIO ROMEROName:
                Dionisio RomeroTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7043

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KEITH WILLIE REED , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cr - 0 0048

- CMH

- 1; 1:16

- cv 00850

- CMH )

Submitted : December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Keith Willie Reed, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith Willie Reed seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 (2012) motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a con stitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional clai ms is debatable or wrong. See Buck
v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reed has not made the requisite sh owing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisiona l process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                       
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 16, 2006 |  | /s/    MARK L.
WEINSTEIN*                                                             
|                      |  | Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of Noble International, Ltd. (the
Company), hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 7, 2008



By:

/S/ THOMAS L. SAELIName:

Thomas L. SaeliTitle:

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
of Noble International, Ltd.By:

/S/ DAVID J. FALLONName:

David J. FallonTitle:

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
of Noble International, Ltd.
# Fourth Court of Appeal s
San Antonio, Texas

November 4, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00298

- CV

EL CABALLERO RANCH, INC. and Laredo Marine, L.L.C.

, Appellant s

v.

GRACE RIVER RANCH, L.L.C.

,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 04

- 001 08

- CVL Honorable Russel Wilson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due July 5 , 2016 but was not filed.

S hortly thereafter, w e notified the court reporter that the reporter’s record was past due; however,

we did not receive a response. On August 26, 2016, we then ordered the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before September 26, 2016. On Septembe r 28, 2016, the court reporter filed a notification of late record, requesting a n extension of time of thirty days

. We granted the request for an extension and ordered the court reporter to file the record by October 26, 2016. On October 26, 2016, the co urt reporter requested an additional extension of time of thirty days to file the record.

After consideration, we GRANT the requested extension and ORDER the reporter to file the reporter’s record on or before November 2 8 , 2016

. The reporter is advised that no further extensions of time to file the brief will be granted absent written proof of extraordinary circumstances. Appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the complete reporter’s record is filed.

We order the clerk of this court to serv e a copy of this order on all counsel and court
reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have h ereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of November, 2016

.___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
June 9, 1955

Hon.‘Archie S. McDonald County Attorney Moore County Dumas, Texas

Dear Mr. McDonald: Opinion No. S-158 Re: Exemption ofwater well drilling motor vehicles from registration under Article 6675a-2, V.C.S., and from the sales tax levied byArticle 7047k, V. C. S.

.’‘, We re’fer toyour request for an opinion as towhether the

motor vehicle retail sales tax as provided inArticle 7047k, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, should be collected on a motor vehicle onwhich is mounted machinery used solely for the purpose of drilling water wells, or is a unit in itself. You further inquire as towhether or not the owner of such vehicles may register them even though Article 66758-2, k. c. s., specifically exempts such vehicles from registration,

Section 2(c) ofArticle 7047k defines “motor vehicle” for the purposes of taxation under the statute as follows:

“The term “motor vehicle’ as used inthis Act shall mean every self-propelled vehicle inor by which any person or property is or may be transported upon a public highway, including trailers and semitrailers, but shall not mean any device moved only by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks and shall not include farm machinery or farm trailers or road building machinery or any self-propelled vehicle used exclusively to move any of the three immediately preceding vehicles.” It is our opinion that a motor vehicle uponwhich is mounted machinery used solely for the purpose ofdrilling water wells would be included inthe above definition ofa motor vehicle and, therefore, subject to the tax under Article 7047k.

Section 5ofArticle 7047k, providing for collection of the tax, reads inpart as follows:

“The taxes levied inthis Article shall be collected by theAssessor and Collector ofTaxes of the county ln which any such motor vehicle is first registered or first

:.,Hon. Archie S. McDonald, Page 2 (Opinion No. S-158)

transferred after such asale; the Tax Collector shall refuse to accept for registration or for transfer any motor vehicle until the tax thereon is paid.” It is therefore **our** opinion that such vehicles would be subject

‘:to the motor vehicle retail sales tax under Article 7047k. However, although such vehicles:‘are not prohibited from registration, they are specifically exempt from’registration under the provisions ofArticle 6675a-2 when used exclusively for the purpose ofdrilling ,water wells and operated or moved only temporarily upon thehighways. SUMMARY A motor vehicle onwhich is mounted machinery used solely for the purpose ofdrilling water wells, andwhich is a unit in itself, is subject to the motor vehicle retail sales tax under Article 7047k. V,C.S. However, such vehicles, although not prohibited from registration, are specifically exempt from registration under Article 6675a-2, V.C.S., when used exclusively for the purpose ofdrilling water wells, and operated or moved only temporarily upon thehighways. Yours **very truly,**  APPROVED: L. P. Lollar Taxation Division John Reeves Reviewer J. A. Amis, Jr. Reviewer JOHN BEN SHEPPERD Attorney General

Robert S. Trotti First Assistant John Ben Shepperd Attorney General LWG:rn