alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board
of Directors and Stockholders


Wolverine
Tube, Inc.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-141815) on Form S-1 of Wolverine Tube, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report
dated June 11, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Wolverine Tube, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years
then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears
in the December 31, 2008, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wolverine Tube,
Inc.




Our
report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company does not
currently have additional borrowing capacity and future funding requirements
with respect to its liquidity requirements could vary materially from the
Company’s current estimates, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of that uncertainty.




/s/
      KPMG LLPBirmingham,
      AlabamaJune 11,
      2009
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Insect Control and Cotton Disease Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Insect Control and Cotton Disease Research People & Locations







Araceli  Rodriquez
                        Insect Control and Cotton Disease Research

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (979) 260-9232
                        
                        
                        Fax: (979) 260-9386(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1525 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1525

To provide financial assistance for higher education to the dependents 
 of Federal, State, and local public safety officers who are killed or 
 permanently and totally disabled as the result of a traumatic injury 
                     sustained in the line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 12, 1997

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Biden) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide financial assistance for higher education to the dependents 
 of Federal, State, and local public safety officers who are killed or 
 permanently and totally disabled as the result of a traumatic injury 
                     sustained in the line of duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Safety Officers Educational 
Assistance Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION TO DEPENDENTS OF 
              PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS KILLED OR PERMANENTLY AND TOTALLY 
              DISABLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

    Part L of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 
(42 U.S.C. 3796 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in the heading for subpart 2, by striking ``Civilian 
        Federal Law Enforcement'' and inserting ``Public Safety'';
            (2) in section 1211(1), by striking ``civilian Federal law 
        enforcement'' and inserting ``public safety'';
            (3) in section 1212(a)(1)(A), by striking ``Federal law 
        enforcement'' and inserting ``public safety'';
            (4) in section 1216(a), by inserting ``and each dependent 
        of a public safety officer killed in the line of duty on or 
        after October 1, 1997,'' after ``1992,''; and
            (5) in section 1217--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (2); and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (6) as 
                paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40016 Conference Calendar

JOHNNY ALLEN MCDOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MARK SEACHRIST, Director, Bradshaw State Jail; DIXON, Warden, Bradshaw State Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:99-CV-406

-------------------- October 26, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Johnny Allen McDowell, Texas prisoner # 756787, appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his civil rights complaint. McDowell argues that his constitutional right to religious freedom was violated when he was fed a meat product that purported to be beef but which actually contained pork, which he is forbidden to eat according to his religious beliefs as a Muslim. After a de novo review of the record, we affirm. Based on the summary judgment evidence, McDowell's claims, at best,No. 01-40016 -2- amount to claims of negligence. Negligence is not actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Daniels v. Williams , 474 U.S. 327, 333-35 (1986); Eason v. Thaler , 14 73 F.3d 1322, 1327-28 n.2 (5th Cir. 1996); George v. King , 837 F.2d 705, 707 (5th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
Opinion issued September 10, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00487-CV

———————————

ROBERT GREEN, Appellant

V.

ALIEF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2019-48281

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties, representing that they no longer wish to pursue this appeal, have 

filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The parties have agreed that they will bear 

their own appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No opinion has issued. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c).
2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), 43.2(f). We direct the Clerk of this Court that costs are to be taxed 

against the parties who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). We dismiss 

all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Hightower and Adams.
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40633 

Conference Calendar

__________________

JIHAAD A.M.E. SAAHIR,

f/k/a Jehad Abdullah Shabazz, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

W.J. ESTELLE, JR; M.D. HERKLOTZ; E.E. ALFORD;

D. LOWRY; DAVID M. BEAGLE; OFFICER SOAPE;

JOHN L. LINDSEY,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:83-CV-225

- - - - - - - - - -

December 19, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This case is here on a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

(IFP) on appeal. Saahir argues that this court's prior decision

never decided whether the tapes were religious or non-religious. 

He admits that some of the tapes are the same tapes which were

the subject of this court's prior decision. He contends that it

is not legal for the defendant to determine what kind of musical
No. 95-40633

-2-

tapes he needs to practice his religion. He contends that he has

proven that music is part of his religious practices, and that

his practices are not necessarily the same as all Muslim sects. 

He argues that he should have been afforded a hearing so that the

district court could determine whether these tapes are a part of

his Muslim practices.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no issue of arguable merit. Accordingly, we deny IFP

and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Howard

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We caution Saahir that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Saahir is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.

IFP DENIED, APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
```
                                                              Exhibit 99.3

                          OFFICER'S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

I, David L. Derfelt,  a duly  authorized  representative of  Navistar  Financial
Corporation, the Servicer, certify:

1.    I  have   reviewed   the   annual  report  and  other  reports  containing
        distribution information for the period covered  by the  annual report;

2.      To the best of my knowledge, no untrue statements of material fact exist
        in these reports, and no material facts were omitted.

3.      These reports include to the best of my  knowledge, the
        financial information  required to be provided to the  trustee under the
        governing documents of the Issuer; and

4.      The  Servicer is  compliant  with its servicing  obligations and minimum
        servicing standards except as detailed below.

5.      No default in performance of any obligations has occurred.

6.      Section 4.02(a)(ii)of  the Servicing  Agreement states that "net income
        and earnings (less  investment  expense) on  funds on  deposit shall be
        included in the  calculation of  investment income for the relevant due
        period." For  Series  2005-1, there   were  two  instances  identified
        (February 2005 and July 2005) where the interest income was not included
        in the calculation of investment income.

     Date: January 30, 2009           By:/s/  DAVID L. DERFELT
                                              David L. Derfelt
                                              V.P., and Controller
                                             (Principal Accounting Officer)
```
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                November 13, 2006 | /s/                HARRY J. WHITE, JR. |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                    | Harry                J. White, Jr.     |
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1272 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 308
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1272

                          [Report No. 105-162]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ARCELLA.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 8, 1997

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

                           February 12, 1998

               Reported by Mr. McCain, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ARCELLA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106 through 12108 of 
title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue 
a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel ARCELLA, United States 
Official Number 1025983.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 308

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1272

                          [Report No. 105-162]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ARCELLA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 12, 1998

                       Rported without amendment`
#### In the Matter of Alaysha E. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; John R.E., Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 589]

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffmann, J.), dated July 5, 2011, which, after a fact-finding and dispositional hearing, found that he had abused and neglected the subject child, and placed him under the supervision of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services pursuant to enumerated terms and conditions.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

“At a fact-finding hearing in a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the petitioner has the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the subject child has been abused or neglected” *(Matter of Kassandra V. [Sylvia L.],*90 AD3d 940, 941 [2011]; *see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; *Matter of Ndeye D. [Benjamin D.],*85 AD3d 1026, 1027 [2011]).

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court’s determination that he sexually abused the subject child is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [e] [iii]; § 1046 [b] [i]; Penal Law § 130.65 [3]; *Matter of Lindsay B. [Carlton B.],*80 AD3d 763, 764 [2011]). The Family Court has considerable discretion in deciding whether a child’s out-of-court statements describing incidents of abuse have been reliably corroborated and whether the record as a whole supports such a finding *(see Matter of Christina F.,*74 NY2d 532, 536 [1989]; *Matter of Alexander M. [Benjamin M.],*88 AD3d 794, 795 [2011]). Here, the child’s sworn in-court testimony suf*989ficiently corroborated her consistent out-of-court description of the abuse *(see Matter of Christina F.,*74 NY2d at 536-537; *Matter of Bianca M.,*282 AD2d 536 [2001]).

Further, the Family Court’s determination that the father neglected the subject child also was supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). The evidence established that the father was highly intoxicated in the child’s presence, the child was not appropriately dressed for the cold weather, and that the father exposed the child to conditions which created an imminent danger of impairing her physical, emotional, or mental condition *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; *Matter of Samara M.,*19 AD3d 214, 214 [2005]; *Matter of Jessica DiB.,*6 AD3d 533, 534 [2004]). Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00450-CR

Michael Woodring, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-08-0016, HONORABLE WILLIAM HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Michael Woodring seeks to appeal from his conviction for driving while intoxicated.

The trial court certified that this is a plea bargain case and that Woodring has no right of appeal

because he waived that right. This appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed

Filed: October 10, 2008

Do Not Publish
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grain Quality and Structure Research: Manhattan, KS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Units
                        Center for Grain and Animal Health Research: Manhattan, KS
                                    Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit
                                    Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research Unit
                                    Stored Product Insect & Engineering Research UnitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Manhattan, Kansas Center for Grain and Animal Health Research Grain Quality and Structure Research People





- Fadi Aramouni
- Neil Baker
- Kenyon Base
- Scott Bean
- Yoanhong Chen
- Jose Covarrubias
- Joaquin DeLeon
- Kevin Fay
- Maria Hazelbaker
- Melanie Kessler-Mathieu
- Laura Knapp
- Lu Guixiang
- Alicsa Mayer
- Kerri McConnell
- Ashton McGinn
- Amie Norton
- Shantha Peiris
- Mayra Perez-Fajardo
- Jaymi Peterson
- Sushma Prakash
- Abraham Rivera
- Bradford Seabourn
- Xiaorong (Shawn) Wu

Shantha  Peiris    Research Plant Pathologist


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
VIII

Calendar No. 605

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1551

For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 24, 1998

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

A BILL

For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMI4 GRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the administration of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act, Kerantha Poole-Christian

7 shall be classified as a child within the meaning of section

8 101(b)(1)(E) of such Act, upon approval of a petition filed
2

S 1551 RS

1 on her behalf by Clifton or Linette Christian, citizens of

2 the United States, pursuant to section 204 of such Act.

3 (b) LIMITATION.—No natural parent, brother, or sis4 ter, if any, of Kerantha Poole-Christian shall, by virtue

5 of such relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or

6 status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Calendar No. 605

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1551

A BILL

For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.

SEPTEMBER 24, 1998

Reported without amendment