alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:2
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 3 of 11 PageID #:3
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 4 of 11 PageID #:4
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:5
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 6 of 11 PageID #:6
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 7 of 11 PageID #:7
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 8 of 11 PageID #:8
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 9 of 11 PageID #:9
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 10 of 11 PageID #:10
Case: 1:03-cv-07759 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/03 Page 11 of 11 PageID #:11
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Michael Christopher Moore v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-19-00786-CR

Trial court case number: 1505997D

Trial court: 213th District Court of Tarrant County

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel, John W. Stickels, filed a motion to withdraw

and an appellate brief concluding that the above-referenced appeal is frivolous. See 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). On January 31, 2020, appellant, Michael 

Christopher Moore, acting pro se, filed a motion to obtain copies of the clerk’s record and 

the reporter’s record “for use in preparing his pro se response to counsel’s brief.”

Appellant also requested an extension of time in which to file his response to Stickels’s

Anders brief.

The Court grants appellant’s motion requesting the record and orders the district

clerk, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to provide a copy of the clerk’s 

and reporter’s records to the pro se appellant. The trial court clerk shall certify to this 

Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the 

records to the appellant is made.

Finally, the Court grants appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a pro 

se Anders response. Appellant’s pro se response to his counsel’s Anders brief shall be 

filed within 45 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _________/s/ Russell Lloyd____________

 Acting individually 

Date: February 6, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
  Accompanying
    Form 10-Q
    Report
 of First
    Industrial, L.P.
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and
    (b))
  Form 10-Q
  Bruce
    W. Duncan
  
    Scott
    A. Musil
  
    A signed original of this written statement required by
    Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
    retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information
    contained in this written statement shall not be deemed
    filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
    incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act
    of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall
    be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:10290
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:10291
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:10292
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:10293
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:10294
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:10295
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:10296
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:10297
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:10298
Case: 1:04-cv-06476 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/29/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:10299
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 14, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Daniel Knutson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                 By  /s/ Daniel Knutson
                                 ----------------------------
                                 Daniel Knutson
                                 Senior Vice President
                                 and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7744

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN MAURICE MCNEIL, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-93-256) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Maurice McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Maurice McNeil filed an untimely notice of appeal of the district court’s order denying his motion to amend the Presentence Investigation Report entered in 1994 as part of his criminal case. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).The district court entered its order on July 30, 1998; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on November 24, 1998. Rule 4(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a notice of appeal be filed within ten days of the order being appealed. The district court may, with or without motion, extend the time for filing a notice of appeal for thirty additional days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. The district court may not otherwise extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. See Ali v. Lyles , 769 F.2d 204, 205 (4th Cir. 1985); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension ofthe appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2003 of Hartford Life, Inc. (the "Company"), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as enacted by
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

                               /s/ Lizabeth H. Zlatkus
                               -----------------------------------------
                               Name:  Lizabeth H. Zlatkus
                               Title: Executive Vice President and Chief
                                      Financial Officer
                               Date:  November 5, 2003
#### HANEY V. THE STATE.

*Abusive and Insulting Language.*

(Decided Dec. 5th, 1906.

42 South. 683.)

Appeal from Cleburne County Court.

Heard before Hon. T. A. Johnson.

*676Burton & McMahan, for appellant.

Massey Wilson, Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed.

Weakley, C. J., Haralson and Denson, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Crops Improvement Research: Fargo, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fargo, North Dakota Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center Cereal Crops Improvement Research People & Locations







Mary E Valenzuela
                        Cereal Crops Improvement Research

                        




                        
                        Physical Science Technician
                        Phone: (701) 239-1272
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.1



Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Principal Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for the year ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William E. Ladin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William E. Ladin, Jr.William E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDate: October 11, 2005
S. 1377

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

An Act

To amend the Act incorporating the American Legion to make a technical correction.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

5 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to Incorporate the American Legion’’,

approved September 16, 1919 (41 Stat. 285; 36 U.S.C. 45) is amended by striking ‘‘December 22, 1961’’ and inserting ‘‘February 28,

1961’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Globus International
Resources Corp(the "Company") for the three months ended December 31, 2004(the
"Report"), the undersigned each hereby certifies that(1)the Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and (2)the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 26, 2005      /s/ YURY GREENE
                             ------------------------
                             Yury Greene
                             Chief Executive Officer


Dated: January 26, 2005      /s/ HERMAN ROTH
                             ------------------------
                             Herman Roth
                             Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company, and forwarded to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                  Page 19 of 19
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7278

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTHONY ANDREWS, a/k/a Wheat , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Terrence W. Boyle , Chief District Judge. ( 7:01

- cr - 00027

- BO

- 1 ; 7:18

- cv 00053

- BO )

Submitted : March 8, 2019 Decided: March 2 8, 2019

Before KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Anthony Andrews , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Andrews seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as an unauthorized successive motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demo nstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district c ourt denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have in dependently reviewed the record and conclude that Andrews has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Andrews’ motion s for a stay pending appeal and to appoint counsel , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7423

IFEANYI ANYIM IKO, Plaintiff- Appellant, versus ALFRED J. O’FERRALL, III, Office of the Public Defender; ROY CLYMER, Doctor, Department of Corrections Mental Health Unit, Patuxent Institution; ALICE SHANNON, Doctor, Clifton T.Perkins Hospital Center; JOANNA BRANDT, Doctor, Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA97-2081-DKC) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 4, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ifeanyi Anyim Iko, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ifeanyi Anyim Iko appeals from the district court's orderdenying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Iko v. O’Ferrall , No. CA-97-2081- DKC (D. Md. Aug. 20, 1997). Iko’s motion for an injunction is denied as moot. We deny Iko’s motion for the appointment of counseland dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
    FROM THE HAGLER BAILLY, INC. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
                    BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       


<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         5,506,845
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,002,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,319,358
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,980,132
<PP&E>                                         7,142,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,676,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 74,333,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,830,853
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       96,066
<OTHER-SE>                                     61,406,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   74,333,779
<SALES>                                        52,497,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               52,497,509
<CGS>                                          40,156,548
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  40,156,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,337,114
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,081,318
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,255,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,255,795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.33
        


</TABLE>
#### Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant, v John W. Cordes, Jr., et al., Respondents.

—Order affirmed, with costs *(see, Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v Masternak,*55 AD2d 472). All concur, Doerr, J., not participating. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.— summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.
ex102.htm


    EXHIBIT 10.2


    


    FORM OF
WAIVER

     

    In
consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s
participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital
Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States
or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required
to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as
published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.

     

    I
acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation,
bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements
(including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer
or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds
any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital
Purchase Program.

     

    This
waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any
state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation,
including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I
would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation
was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship.
COS - MOTION TO REMAND – SUPPLEMENTAL Page 1 of 1

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: crowell@kite.com

CROWELL LAW

P.O. Box 923

Salem, OR 97308

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

EUGENE DIVISION

VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOE NO. 1,

Defendant.

 Case No.: 6:14-cv-00812-MC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO 

REMAND

I certify that on this day I caused to be mailed first class mail and delivered by email 

plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion to Remand on counsel for defendant at the following addresses:

Erin R. Christison

NOVATION LAW

5955 Shoreview Ln N. suite #102

PO Box 21534

Keizer, OR 97307

email: erinc@novationlaw.com

DATED: June 12, 2014.

CROWELL LAW

/s/ Carl D. Crowell

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049

email: crowell@kite.com

(503) 581-1240

Of attorneys for plaintiff

Case 6:14-cv-00812-MC Document 15 Filed 06/12/14 Page 1 of 1 Page ID#: 219