alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 154 (Friday, August 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 44737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; Integrative Neuroscience 
Initiative on Alcoholism (INIA) Consortia (RFA AA 21-011,012,013) 
Review Panel B.
    Date: October 19, 2021.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Extramural Project Review Branch, Office of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, Room 2116, MSC 6902, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 443-0800, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f6d6d7a756e7c4f626e66632161666721686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f69494838c9785b69b979f9ad8989f9ed8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 9, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-17301 Filed 8-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
Accompanying Form 10-Q/A Report
of First Industrial, L.P.
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)) Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,
Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to
his knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
June 30, 2004 of First Industrial, L.P. (the Company) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: November 5, 2004
    
    /s/ Michael W. BrennanMichael W. BrennanChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.Dated: November 5, 2004
    
    /s/ Michael J. HavalaMichael J. HavalaChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
information contained in this written statement shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be
deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth
by specific reference to such filing.
Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:1

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 2 of 26 PageID #:2

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 3 of 26 PageID #:3

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 4 of 26 PageID #:4

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 5 of 26 PageID #:5

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 6 of 26 PageID #:6

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 7 of 26 PageID #:7

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 8 of 26 PageID #:8

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 9 of 26 PageID #:9

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 10 of 26 PageID #:10

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 11 of 26 PageID #:11

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 12 of 26 PageID #:12

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 13 of 26 PageID #:13

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 14 of 26 PageID #:14

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 15 of 26 PageID #:15

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 16 of 26 PageID #:16

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 17 of 26 PageID #:17

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 18 of 26 PageID #:18

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 19 of 26 PageID #:19

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 20 of 26 PageID #:20

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 21 of 26 PageID #:21

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 22 of 26 PageID #:22

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 23 of 26 PageID #:23

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 24 of 26 PageID #:24

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 25 of 26 PageID #:25

Case: 1:03-cr-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/27/03 Page 26 of 26 PageID #:26
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1469

To provide for the expansion of the historic community cemetery of El

Rito, New Mexico, through the special designation of five acres of Carson

National Forest adjacent to the cemetery.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8, 1997

Mr. BINGAMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide for the expansion of the historic community cemetery of El Rito, New Mexico, through the special designation of five acres of Carson National Forest adjacent

to the cemetery.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 (a) The village of El Rito, New Mexico (El Rito), is

5 a small community of approximately 2,500 residents, com6 pletely surrounded by the Carson National Forest in New

7 Mexico.
2

S 1469 IS

1 (b) The historic community cemetery El Rito is adja2 cent to the lands of the Carson National Forest in New

3 Mexico. After generations of use, there is no more avail4 able space left in the cemetery and the community mem5 bers are required to get special permits to bury their de6 ceased on Forest Service land.

7 (c) The requirement for special use permits creates

8 an undue bureaucratic requirement upon families within

9 the El Rito community times when they are suffering from

10 grief.

11 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF LANDS.

12 The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the

13 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

14 shall designate five acres of land in the Carson National

15 Forest adjacent to the historic El Rito cemetery as special

16 use land for use as cemetery land for members of the El

17 Rito community to bury their deceased.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, John H. Gray, certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Docucorp
International, Inc.; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Docucorp
International, Inc. as of and for the periods presented in this report; 4.     The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within the entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; 5.     The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of
Directors:  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting. /s/ John H. Gray  John H. Gray
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration
(Principal Financial Officer)
March 16, 2004
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION

(not the court’s final written decision)

The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the 

written opinions that are originally filed by the court. 

A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions 

can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an 

order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential 

purposes a previously “unpublished” opinion. Additionally, nonsubstantive edits 

(for style, grammar, citation, format, punctuation, etc.) are made before the 

opinions that have precedential value are published in the official reports of court 

decisions: the Washington Reports 2d and the Washington Appellate Reports. An 

opinion in the official reports replaces the slip opinion as the official opinion of 

the court.

The slip opinion that begins on the next page is for a published opinion, and it 

has since been revised for publication in the printed official reports. The official 

text of the court’s opinion is found in the advance sheets and the bound volumes 

of the official reports. Also, an electronic version (intended to mirror the 

language found in the official reports) of the revised opinion can be found, free of 

charge, at this website: https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports. 

For more information about precedential (published) opinions, nonprecedential 

(unpublished) opinions, slip opinions, and the official reports, see 

https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions and the information that is linked there.
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/warep
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S FROM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000822418
<NAME>                        Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

                              <S>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         491,048
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,692,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                   65,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,352,706
<PP&E>                                         3,209,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,917,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,906,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,408,944
<BONDS>                                        164,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    104
<COMMON>                                       1,944
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,331,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,906,812
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,772,443
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,619,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,753,510
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             92,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (692,431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (692,431)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (692,431)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.09)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.09)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>  This  amount  represents Basic Earnings  per Share in accordance  with the
      requirements  of  Statement of  Financial Accounting  Standards No.  128 -
      "Earnings per Share".
<F2>  This  amount represents Diluted  Earnings per Share in accordance with the
      requirements  of  Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards  No.  128 -
      "Earnings per Share".
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

(i) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                |  |  |  |        |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | 
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | March 27, 2009 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Manish Singh                     
|      |  |                |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Manish Singh, Ph.D.                  
|      |  |                |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Joseph Fratello, Respondent, v County of Suffolk et al., Appellants.

[947 NYS2d 530]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rebolini, J.), dated June 23, 2011, which, upon a jury verdict finding that the defendants were not negligent, granted the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CFLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence and for a new trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*799A jury verdict should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached the verdict by any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,*86 NY2d 744 [1995]; *Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 498 [1978]; *Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129 [1985]). The jury’s determination that the defendant bus driver, Thomas Wilson, was not negligent was contrary to the weight of the evidence. The evidence adduced at trial demonstrated that Wilson violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1122 (a) by traveling on the shoulder of Montauk Highway and overtaking vehicles proceeding in the same direction while passing on the right. A violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law constitutes negligence as a matter of law *(see Vainer v DiSalvo,*79 AD3d 1023 [2010]; *Botero v Erraez,*289 AD2d 274 [2001]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence and for a new trial. Angiolillo, J.P., Florio, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.
#### In re FLINT’S WILL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March, 1896.)

Proceeding for the probate of the will of Annie S. Flint, deceased.

No opinion. Decree affirmed, with costs.
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 10, 2015

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. AURELIO GARCIA SANCHEZ

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Macon County No. 2012CR13 David Earl Durham, Judge

No. M2014

- 01997

- CCA

- R3

- CD

– Filed December 4, 2015



### _____________________________

T HOMAS T. W OODALL

, J., concurring.

First, I concur in Judge Holloway’s separate opinion, and with the results reached in the lead opinion. Second, I write to remind both the State a nd the defense bar that

under bi n ding prec e dent from our supreme court that “[s]imply stated, polygraph

evidence is inadmissible.” State v. Sexton , 368 S.W.3d 371, 409 (Tenn. 2012). The results of polygraph examinations are inherently un reliable, they are thus not probativ e, and they lack relevance. A defenda n t’s willingness or refusal to take a polygraph test is

not admissible. Id . The trial court should have sua sponte ruled that all evidence of the polygraph examination in this case must be excluded. I know of no exc eption to the rule of inadmissibility of such evidence. Whether the threat or use of a polygraph examination might someday be argued by a defendant as evidence of an involuntary statement or as evidence of coercion, and thus be an exception to the rule of inadmissibility

, is not raised in this case.

All this being said, I fail to see in this case how the erroneous admission of evidence of the polygraph examination during the suppression hearing affected the issue

before the trial court

– whether the st atements made by Defendant should have been suppressed. Accordingly, I too believe that the judgments must be affirmed.

____________________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, PRESIDING JUDGE
Case: 1:03-cv-02160 Document #: 33 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:218

Case: 1:03-cv-02160 Document #: 33 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:219

Case: 1:03-cv-02160 Document #: 33 Filed: 12/22/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:220
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Gainesville, Florida
 close




            Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home People & Locations







Barbara L Soto
                        Location Support Staff

                        




                        
                        FIN & BUDG TECHN
                        Phone: (352) 316-7664
                        
                        
                        Fax: (352) 374-5852(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov