alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Úradný vestník C 199/2008

| | ISSN 1725-5236 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 199 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Zväzok 515. augusta 2008 |

ISSN 1725-5236

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 199

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Zväzok 515. augusta 2008

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Uznesenia, odporúčania a stanoviská |
| | STANOVISKÁ |
| | Dvor audítorov |
| 2008/C 199/01 | Stanovisko Dvora audítorov Európskych spoločenstiev č. 3/2008 k návrhu nariadenia Rady, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa nariadenie (Euratom, ESUO, EHS) č. 549/69, ktorým sa stanovujú kategórie úradníkov a ostatných zamestnancov Európskych spoločenstiev, na ktorých sa vzťahujú ustanovenia článku 12, článku 13 druhého odseku a článku 14 protokolu o výsadách a imunitách spoločenstiev | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

I   Uznesenia, odporúčania a stanoviská

STANOVISKÁ

Dvor audítorov

2008/C 199/01

Stanovisko Dvora audítorov Európskych spoločenstiev č. 3/2008 k návrhu nariadenia Rady, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa nariadenie (Euratom, ESUO, EHS) č. 549/69, ktorým sa stanovujú kategórie úradníkov a ostatných zamestnancov Európskych spoločenstiev, na ktorých sa vzťahujú ustanovenia článku 12, článku 13 druhého odseku a článku 14 protokolu o výsadách a imunitách spoločenstiev

1

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

I Uznesenia, odporúčania a stanoviská

STANOVISKÁ

Dvor audítorov

| 5.8.2008 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2008

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 199/1

---

STANOVISKO DVORA AUDÍTOROV EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV č. 3/2008

k návrhu nariadenia Rady, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa nariadenie (Euratom, ESUO, EHS) č. 549/69, ktorým sa stanovujú kategórie úradníkov a ostatných zamestnancov Európskych spoločenstiev, na ktorých sa vzťahujú ustanovenia článku 12, článku 13 druhého odseku a článku 14 protokolu o výsadách a imunitách spoločenstiev

(2008/C 199/01)

DVOR AUDÍTOROV EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV,

so zreteľom na Zmluvu o založení Európskeho spoločenstva, a najmä na jej článok 248 ods. 4 a článok 291,

so zreteľom na Protokol o výsadách a imunitách Európskych spoločenstiev, a najmä na jeho článok 16,

so zreteľom na návrh Komisie z 23. mája 2008 (1),

so zreteľom na žiadosť Rady o stanovisko k tomuto návrhu, zaslanú Dvoru audítorov 6. júna 2008,

keďže cieľom návrhu Komisie je, aby zamestnanci Europolu nepožívali imunitu vo veci súdneho konania, ak sa zúčastňujú na činnostiach spoločných vyšetrovacích tímov vytvorených členskými štátmi v rámci vyšetrovania trestných činov, ktoré spadajú do pôsobnosti Europolu,

PRIJAL TOTO STANOVISKO:

Dvor audítorov nemá žiadne pripomienky k navrhovanej úprave, v ktorej sa stanovuje, že imunita vo veci súdneho konania sa nevzťahuje na zamestnancov Europolu poskytnutých k dispozícii spoločnému vyšetrovaciemu tímu.

Toto stanovisko prijal Dvor audítorov v Luxemburgu na svojom zasadnutí 17. júla 2008.

Za Dvor audítorov

Vítor Manuel DA SILVA CALDEIRA

predseda

---

(1)  KOM(2008) 305 v konečnom znení z 23. mája 2008.

1

---
Case: 1:02-cv-04721 Document #: 173 Filed: 03/23/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1173
Case: 1:02-cv-04721 Document #: 173 Filed: 03/23/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1174
Jeffrey J. Druckman, OSB No. 792148

E-mail address: jeffigljjdlaw.com

Janine C. Blatt, OSB No. 922323

E-mail address: jaiiine@jjdlaw.com

Druckman & Blatt, P.C.

0424 S.W. Iowa Street

Portland, Oregon 97239

Telephone: (503)241-5033

Facsimile: (503)241-9033

Attomeys for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

JULIE FILAMORE-ANGEL,

Plaintiff, ^^278-JE

^ DECLARATION OF ANDRALENE

ALLEN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S

PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OREGON, d.b.a, PROVIDENCE ST.

VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant.

I, Andralene Allen, depose and say as follows:

1. At all material times herein, Providence Health & Services - Oregon

("Providence") has employed me asa Senior Human Resources Consultant. I have personal

knowledge ofthe fects recited herein.

1 - Declaration ofAndralene Alien

Druckman & Blatt, P.C.

0424 S.W. Iowa Street

Portland, Oregon 97239

(503) 241-5033; Fax: (503) 241-9033

Case 3:14-cv-01278-JE Document 13 Filed 07/30/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:14-cv-01278-JE Document 13 Filed 07/30/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:14-cv-01278-JE Document 13 Filed 07/30/15 Page 3 of 3
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1545

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on Benzenesulfonic

acid, 4-[[3-[[2-hydroxy-3-[[4-methoxyphenyl) amino]carbonyl]-1-naphthalenyl]azo]-4-methylbenzoyl]amino]-, calcium salt (2:1).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on

Benzenesulfonic acid, 4-[[3-[[2-hydroxy-3-[[4-

methoxyphenyl) amino]carbonyl]-1-naphtha-lenyl]azo]-4-

methylbenzoyl]amino]-, calcium salt (2:1).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1545 IS

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BENZENESULFONIC

2 ACID, 4-[[3-[[2-HYDROXY-3-[[4-METHOXY3 PHENYL) AMINO]CARBONYL]-1-NAPHTHA4 LENYL]AZO]-4-METHYLBENZOYL]AMINO]-,

5 CALCIUM SALT (2:1).

6 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar7 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

8 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:

‘‘ 9902.32.XX Benzenesulfonic

acid, 4-[[3-[[2-

hydroxy-3-[[4-

methoxyphenyl)amino]carbonyl]-

1-naphthalenyl]azo]-4-

methylbenzoyl]amino]-, calcium

salt (2:1) provided

for in subheading

3204.17.60 ........... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

10 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re11 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

12 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

13 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Shirley A CHARLES, Petitioner-Appellant v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 11-40350

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 14, 2011.

Shirley A. Charles, Dickinson, TX, pro se.

*820Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Shirley Ann Charles, Texas prisoner # 692618, was convicted in 1994 of possession of a controlled substance, for which she was sentenced to 40 years in prison. She filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application in 1998, which the district court dismissed as time barred. She now seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of two motions to amend her application.

We dismissed a previous appeal by Charles of the denial of the motions to amend for lack of jurisdiction because the ruling was made by a magistrate judge, and there was no consent to proceed before the magistrate judge. *Charles v. Thaler,*No. 10-41009, slip op. at 1-2 (5th Cir. Dec. 13, 2010) (citing *Colburn v. Bunge Towing, Inc.,*883 F.2d 372, 379 (5th Cir.1989)). Although the district court has since denied a COA, the district court has not entered a final order addressing the motions to amend. We continue to lack jurisdiction over the magistrate judge’s ruling. *See Colburn,*883 F.2d at 379. Further, we generally have no jurisdiction to entertain any appeal absent a final order, *see Goodman v. Harris Cnty.,*443 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir.2006), nor may we consider a COA motion absent a final order, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2253(a), (c).

In light of the foregoing, Charles’s request for a COA is DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
6/30/06 MLS127204-2T-LIT (07-06-06) 65100-858LIT-4383
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
JAMES T. SULLIVAN, etc., No, 04 C 3662
Plaintiff, Judge James B. Moran

TPM PLUMBING, INC., et al.,

)
)
)
)
vy. )
)
)
)
)

Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OF JUDGMENT
On June 29, 2006, Judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor, JAMES
T. SULLIVAN, not individually but as Trustee of the PLUMBERS’ PENSION FUND LOCAL
130, U.A., et al., and against Defendants/Judgment Debtors, TPM PLUMBING, INC. and
THOMAS D. McGINNIS d/b/a TPM PLUMBING, INC., jointly and severally, in the amount of

$211,918.86.

ENTER:

Date:__) /6/06 Je sna 6. Mom

Gp. James B. Moran
ited States District Court

Attorney for Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor:
Lisa M. Simioni

Lewis, Overbeck & Furman, LLP

135 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 2300 ,”
Chicago, IL 60603-4274

(312) 580-1200
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1451 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1451

       To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 1997

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new item:

      

``    9902.32.42     2,7-                                                                                       
                      naphthalenedisul                                                                          
                      fonic acid, 4-                                                                            
                      (benzoylamino)-5-                                                                         
                       hydroxy-,sodium                                                                          
                      salt (CAS No.                                                                             
                      79873-39-5)                                                                               
                      (provided for in                                                                          
                      subheading                                                                                
                      2924.29.70.00)..  Free              No change        No change        On or before 12/    
                                                                                             31/2000            
                                                                                                              ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41676

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FERNANDO HERNANDEZ-PUGA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-03-CR-1070-1-ALL

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Fernando Hernandez-Puga appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Hernandez-Puga contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony”

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. 

He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one

under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a),

his judgment must be reformed to reflect a conviction only under

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 03-41676

-2-

that provision, and his sentence must be vacated and the case

remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment

and one year of supervised release. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Hernandez-Puga acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### JAHODA et al., Respondents, v. ELDREDGE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

September 9, 1896.)

Action by Anton Jahoda and another against Charles T. Eldredge and another.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1521 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1521

   To provide a law enforcement exception to the prohibition on the 
               advertising of certain electronic devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 1997

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide a law enforcement exception to the prohibition on the 
               advertising of certain electronic devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Law Enforcement Technology 
Advertisement Clarification Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO PROHIBITION ON ADVERTISING CERTAIN DEVICES.

    Section 2512 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(3) It shall not be unlawful under this section to advertise for 
sale a device described in subsection (1) of this section if the 
advertisement is mailed, sent, or carried in interstate or foreign 
commerce solely to a domestic provider of wire or electronic 
communication service or to an agency of the United States, a State, or 
a political subdivision thereof which is duly authorized to use such 
device.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
  Accompanying
    Form 10-Q
    Report
    of First Industrial, L.P.
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and
    (b))
  Form 10-Q
  W.
    Edwin Tyler
         Michael
    J. Havala
         A signed original of this written statement required by
    Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
    retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information
    contained in this written statement shall not be deemed
    filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
    incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act
    of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall
    be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.
EX-31                               Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

                RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, John J. Anton, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of WSN Group,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; and

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.

Dated: January 16, 2004                By: /s/ John J. Anton
                                       John J. Anton, President/Chief
                                       Executive Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research: Frederick, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Frederick, Maryland Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research People & Locations







Matthew A McMahon
                        Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research

                        




                        
                        ORISE participant
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
UNIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION



<CAPTION>
                                                                    SIX MONTHS ENDED                  THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                        JUNE 30,                           JUNE 30,
                                                             -----------------------------       --------------------------
                                                                2001              2000              2001           2000
                                                             -----------       -----------       ----------     -----------
<S>                                                          <C>               <C>               <C>            <C>
INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
     Net loss..............................................  $  (104,014)      $(1,364,734)      $ (306,670)    $ (143,036)

CALCULATION OF COMMON STOCK
     Common shares outstanding at beginning
        of period..........................................    2,880,028         2,869,862        2,880,028      2,878,462
     Shares issued in private placement during period......           --             9,850               --          1,250
                                                             -----------       -----------       ----------     ----------
        Common shares used in basic calculation............    2,880,028         2,879,712        2,880,028      2,879,712
                                                             -----------       -----------       ----------     ----------

     Common stock equivalent of options....................      162,836           169,847          162,836        169,847
                                                             -----------       -----------       ----------     ----------
        Common shares used in fully diluted calculation....    3,042,864         3,049,559        3,042,864      3,049,559
                                                             -----------       -----------       ----------     ----------

LOSS PER SHARE
     Basic.................................................  $     (0.04)      $     (0.47)      $    (0.11)    $    (0.05)
                                                             ===========       ===========       ==========     ==========
     Fully diluted.........................................  $     (0.03)      $     (0.45)      $    (0.10)    $    (0.05)
                                                             ===========       ===========       ==========     ==========
</TABLE>