alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Santo Gonzalez, Petitioner, v Dominick Venettozzi, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 686]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

During a random pat frisk, a correction officer found petitioner to be in possession of a toothbrush with two razor blades melted into the handle secreted inside a talcum powder container. Petitioner’s cell was then searched and a correction officer discovered that the blades of two state-issued razors found inside the cell had been removed and aluminum foil inserted in their place. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon, possessing an altered item and smuggling. He was found guilty of the charges at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence consisting of the misbehav*1314ior report and related documentation, together with the considerable testimony adduced at the hearing, supports the determination of guilt *(see Matter of McGowan v Fischer,*88 AD3d 1038, 1038 [2011]; *Matter of Terrence v Fischer,*64 AD3d 1110, 1111 [2009]). Petitioner’s claim that the weapon was planted in retaliation for a prior incident involving a female staff member presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to decide *(see Matter of Lopez v Fischer,*69 AD3d 1076, 1076 [2010]; *Matter of Holmes v Fischer,*66 AD3d 1093, 1094 [2009]). In addition, we are not persuaded that the correction counselor was improperly denied as a witness inasmuch as she was not present for the pat frisk or cell search, and her testimony would have been irrelevant to the charges *(see Matter of Lozada v Cook,*67 AD3d 1232, 1233 [2009], *lv denied*14 NY3d 706 [2010]; *Matter of Thompson v Votraw,*65 AD3d 1403, 1404 [2009]). Moreover, given that petitioner testified about complaints he made to the counselor concerning alleged retaliation, the counselor’s testimony in this regard would have been redundant *(see Matter of Reid v Fischer,*80 AD3d 1035, 1036 [2011]; *Matter of Williams v Fischer,*69 AD3d 1278, 1278-1279 [2010]). Petitioner’s claim that he was improperly denied two inmate witnesses is also unavailing given that these individuals executed witness refusal forms and were personally interviewed by the Hearing Officer, who ascertained that they had no knowledge of the incident and did not wish to testify *(see Matter of Reynolds v LaClair,*89 AD3d 1338, 1339 [2011]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or are lacking in merit.

Peters, EJ., Rose, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Garry, JJ, concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50722

Summary Calendar

 

JUNE GOFF,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR TEXAS 

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-97-CV-204

- - - - - - - - - -

February 22, 1999

Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

June Lee Goff, Texas prisoner #731056, seeks a certificate

of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal

of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred by 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2244(d)’s one-year limitations period. The district court did

not address the merits of Goff’s petition. Goff contends that

his § 2254 petition was timely filed because his state habeas

application tolled the limitations period.
No. 98-50722

-2-

Because Goff’s petition was dismissed as time-barred, in

order for him to obtain a COA, he must make a credible showing

that the district court erred in dismissing his petition as timebarred. See Sonnier v. Johnson, 161 F.3d 941, 943-46 (5th Cir.

1998). 

There is a one-year grace period, commencing on April 24,

1996 (the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act) for the filing of § 2254 petitions, and petitions

filed before or on April 24, 1997, are considered timely. 

Flanagan v. Johnson, 154 F.3d 196, 200-02 (5th Cir. 1998). Also,

the period of time a properly filed state habeas petition is

pending tolls the limitations period and the one-year grace

period. See Fields v. Johnson, 159 F.3d 914, 915-16 (5th Cir.

1998).

The district court determined that Goff had filed his state

habeas application on February 6, 1997, and that the application

was denied on March 19, 1997. The period of time the state

habeas application was pending was 42 days, and the one-year

grace period for Goff’s filing of his § 2254 petition was

extended by 42 days, thus making his petition due by June 5,

1997. Goff’s petition was stamped filed by the district court on

June 5, 1997. Goff’s petition was timely filed, and he has made

a credible showing that the district court erred. 

Accordingly, COA is GRANTED, the judgment of the district

court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further

proceedings.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Weed and Insect Biology Research: Fargo, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Fargo, North Dakota Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center Weed and Insect Biology Research People & Locations







Zahirul  Talukder
                        Weed and Insect Biology Research

                        




                        
                        POST DOC
                        Phone: (701) 239-1262
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1435 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1435

         To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 1997

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
    

         ``    9902.29.34     5-Nitro-2-                                                                        
                               thiazolamine                                                                     
                               (CAS No. 121-66-                                                                 
                               4) (provided for                                                                 
                               in subheading                                                                    
                               2934.10.10).....  Free        No change        No change       On or before      
                                                                                               12/31/2000       
                                                                                                              ''

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Biological Control of Insects Research: Columbia, MO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Columbia, Missouri Biological Control of Insects Research People & Locations







Megan  Halford
                        Biological Control of Insects Research

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (573) 882-4117
                        
                        
                        Fax: (573) 882-0060(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                        |                            |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                           |                   |                       |
| Dated:              August 10, 2006 |                        | /s/              ROBERT E. MEAD |
|                                | Robert              E. Mead |
|                                |                        |

----
# Official Journal C 278/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 278 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6324 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 278

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6324 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 278/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9868 – Raytheon Technologies Corporation/Saudi Arabian Oil Company/Middle East Cyber Services JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 278/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9862 – Fiege/Reiner Kurzhals/Cornelius Brosche/Remondis/WDL) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 278/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9868 – Raytheon Technologies Corporation/Saudi Arabian Oil Company/Middle East Cyber Services JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 278/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9862 – Fiege/Reiner Kurzhals/Cornelius Brosche/Remondis/WDL) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 278/03 | Euro exchange rates — 21 August 2020 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 278/03

Euro exchange rates — 21 August 2020

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 278/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9876 – TA Associates/Francisco Partners/Edifecs) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 278/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9876 – TA Associates/Francisco Partners/Edifecs) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1388

To provide relief from unfair interest and penalties on refunds retroactively

ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself and Mr. BROWNBACK) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

A BILL

To provide relief from unfair interest and penalties on refunds retroactively ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, as amended,

4 is amended by adding the following new section:

5 ‘‘SEC. 603. In the event any refunds of any rates and

6 charges made, demanded, or received for reimbursement

7 of State ad valorem taxes in connection with the sale of

8 natural gas prior to 1989 are ordered to be made by the
2

S 1388 IS

1 Commission, the refunds shall be ordered to be made with2 out interest or penalty of any kind.’’.

Æ
ae]

AO 450(Rev. 5/85, Mudgment in a Civil Case

United States District Court

Northern District of Illinois
Eastern Diyision

Hazel Tucker JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

nS : bs
v. 99 Case Number: 03 C 5094
ye

Jo Anne B. Barnhart

a Jury Verdict. This action game before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been
tried and the jury rendered’ its" ‘Verdict.

a Decision by Court. This action came to hearing before the Court. The issues have
been heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Claimant’s motion for summary
judgment is granted, and the commissioner’s motion for summary judgment is denied. This
case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings beginning at step two not
inconsistent with this opinion.

Michael W. Dobbins, Clerk of Court

/ ,
Date: 4/8/2004 Ol A) t

Donna Kuempel, Dephty Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 02 C 8206

)

WELDON A. YOUNG, JR., )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Counsel for the asserted successor in interest to the

plaintiff mortgagee in this decade-old and long-since-terminated

mortgage foreclosure action has recently filed two motions: Dkt.

No. 11 for a substitution of the party plaintiff and Dkt No. 12

for the entry of a second amended judgment. But the final

judgment that closed the case on February 28, 2003 did not

provide for the retention of jurisdiction, and no jurisdictional

basis has been proffered for granting the relief sought, nor is

this Court aware of any predicate for doing so. Accordingly Dkt.

Nos. 11 and 12 are denied. 

_________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Dated: September 30, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 2 and 3 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 1997, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                         401,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,852,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,324,512
<PP&E>                                         345,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (76,010)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,221,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,295,971
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,891,584
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,017,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,221,145
<SALES>                                     10,015,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,015,328
<CGS>                                        7,370,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,370,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,423,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             175,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,046,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                   413,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   617,668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02

</TABLE>
#### ADSIT, Appellant, v. GENERAL FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department,

July 31, 1896.)

Action by Agnes J. Adsit against the General Fire Extinguisher Co.

John S. McAdam, for appellant.

William A. Jones, Jr., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This order must be reversed. The notice of claim'of preference, and that it would be moved for at the opening of the court, was duly given. It was served with the notice of trial, and was sufficient to satisfy the statute. The special notice was given pursuant to and in consequence of the adoption of rule 3 of the trial term rules of this court. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion for preference granted.
Exhibit 99.7


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No(s). 333-204848, 333-184108, 333-178260, 333-129631 and 333-214948 on Form S-8, 333-220746 on Form F-10 and 333-182656 on Form F-3 and to the use of our reports dated March 29, 2018, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017.





/s/ Deloitte LLP


Chartered Professional Accountants


Licensed Public Accountants


Toronto, Canada


April 2, 2018