alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               4,422
<SECURITIES>                                         1,893
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                           (14)
<INVENTORY>                                            965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    11,689
<PP&E>                                               5,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (1,605)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      22,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               10,559
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               204
<OTHER-SE>                                          11,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        22,237
<SALES>                                             20,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    20,530
<CGS>                                                8,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       19,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,090)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,090)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.012)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1575 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1575

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                                 An Act

 
  To rename the Washington National Airport located in the District of 
    Columbia and Virginia as the ``Ronald Reagan Washington National 
                               Airport''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The airport described in the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for 
the administration of the Washington National Airport, and for other 
purposes'', approved June 29, 1940 (54 Stat. 686), and known as the 
Washington National Airport, shall be known and designated as the 
``Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    (a) In General.--
        (1) The following provisions of law are amended by striking 
    ``Washington National Airport'' each place it appears and inserting 
    ``Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport'':
            (A) Subsection (b) of the first section of the Act of June 
        29, 1940 (54 Stat. 686, chapter 444).
            (B) Sections 106 and 107 of the Act of October 31, 1945 (59 
        Stat. 553, chapter 443).
            (C) Section 41714 of title 49, United States Code.
            (D) Chapter 491 of title 49, United States Code.
        (2) Section 41714(d) of title 49, United States Code, is 
    amended in the subsection heading by striking ``Washington National 
    Airport'' and inserting ``Ronald Reagan Washington National 
    Airport''.
    (b) Other References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Washington 
National Airport shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald 
Reagan Washington National Airport''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 23.1

 

(On LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. Letterhead)

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

 

As independent oil and gas consultants, LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. hereby consents to (a) the use of our report setting forth our estimates of proved reserves and future revenue, as of December 31, 2006, to the interest of Tengasco, Inc. (“Tengasco”) in certain oil and gas properties; and (b) all references to our firm included in or made a part of Tengasco’s Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

|   | s/_ LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|

|   | LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

|   | (Signature) |
|--------|-------------|

 

Dallas, Texas

2/08/2007
#### CORSE et al. v. CHAPMAN et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

December 18, 1895.)

Action by John Corse and others, trustees, etc., against Sarah M. 'Chapman and others.

No opinion. Motion for new trial denied, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1108 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1108

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
         New York, as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself and Mr. D'Amato) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
         New York, as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, New York, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the Federal building referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald H. Brown 
Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### GRAVES V. THE STATE.

(Decided Feb. 26th, 1910.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. William E. Fort.

Frank S.' Andress, for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Reversed and remanded on authority of *Grain v. The*State, 166 Ala. 1.
INPUT DATA:

Signal Timing: Current Beaverton

Programmed Yellow ïme: 3.5 s

Programmed All-Red ïme. 0.5 s

Iming Enor: 0.4 s (+0.1s / -0.3 s)

Critical Stopping Distance: 141ft

Design Speed: 30 mph

Vehicle Speed: 30 mph

Vehicle Length: 20 ft

TIMING

ERROR

RANGE

0

E

oE

O(ogEÆC- aõE Fa ì oõu? n-COO ì- (It(Jv E å8E S E¡b (I) oc -c E :g; t fiÞ H

o Pb Ë

P gE Ä o o- u= ^1v E ó m(v (l) a ãà5 d +fr< A ü2î)

-.- 

ts F .9p,F fi ,5ãg

h LUo O

(J r-Ø fL

! " j

(1)d) od)

o(Ð

=9

E

a

E

O

co

(I¡

c

9

-

o

(u

oú-ô

CJÒ

C

$

an õ

o, C'õ

o_

ta

(J

o

O)

p

I

ul

(E

o

I

o)

d)

s

o¡

.c,

oE

o(Ð

o

c)o

c(!

.Aö

c

o

EG

o

É.

T' c

o

o

o

U)

I

c¡

,p

+

lUo

z

IUÉ.

TU

lJlrJÉ.

IU()z

É

U)

o

o

z

uJ

tr=

I

Speed/ïme Scale:

30 mph = 4ftJs

Seconds

0.0 0.5 1.0

4

Feet

lntersection Grade:

Level,0%

EVENT

Feet

DISTANCE

Vehicle 30 mph

Constant Velocity

TRAFFIC LIGHTS:

SWAllen Blvd

SWLombardAve

TIME (Only for 30 mph)

Seconds

= Conflict Point

22

N

o

30 *er,

ncl oo¡t

c.l

c.)

I

t-

<"i ALL

React on RED

o

ci

I

oro

rf) lf)

Deceleration o

-Tf VehictestoppingArea VehictectearanceAre" -l

30 MPH VEHICLE Speed - Current Beaverton Yellow Change lnterval - EB SWAllen Blvd, Beaverton

Scaled drawing showing vehicle stopping distances, interference(s), violation point(s) and enors related to intercection and traffic signals.

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

ct)

+

i SWAllen Blvd 

i

Ë(t

U)

(¡) (J

E

d)

c,

(¡)

t_

Posted S

VIOLATION POINT

7

l.

(rr.¡ì1,ìl

Exhibit A
#### Angel Carchipulla, Respondent, v 6661 Broadway Partners, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[945 NYS2d 4]—

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kibbie F. Payne, J.), entered October 20, 2011, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and granted plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by showing that defendant’s failure to provide an adequate safety device enumerated in Labor Law § 240 (1) proximately caused him to fall off a ladder, injuring him *(see Orellano v 29 E. 37th St. Realty Corp.,*292 AD2d 289 [2002]). Plaintiff was not required to present evidence of a specific structural defect in the ladder *(see Lipari v AT Spring, LLC,*92 AD3d 502, 503-504 [2012]; *Orellano,*292 AD2d at 290-291). Contrary to defendant’s unpreserved contention, there is no tri*574able issue of fact about whether plaintiffs negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident, given that there is no evidence that he fell because he simply lost his footing *(see Ervin v Consolidated Edison of N.Y.,*93 AD3d 485 [2012]; *Lipari,*92 AD3d at 504). Rather, plaintiffs uncontradicted testimony was that the ladder shook and fell while plaintiff was standing on it.

Defendant failed to preserve its arguments that the court should have dismissed plaintiffs common law negligence and Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6) claims. In any event, defendant’s contentions regarding those claims are academic in light of the grant of plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on liability *(see Henningham v Highbridge Community Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.,*91 AD3d 521, 522 [2012]; *Auriemma v Biltmore*Theatre, *LLC,*82 AD3d 1, 12 [2011]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Catterson, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Motion for a stay of trial pending appeal denied.
Summary of Revised Timing of Annual Board Member Stock Unit Grants



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Summary of Revised Timing of Annual Board Member Stock Unit Grants 
 On August 20, 2008, the Board of Directors of The Gap, Inc. (the
“Board”) determined that the annual stock units granted to continuing non-employee directors following the company’s annual shareholders meeting, as well as the initial grant made to any non-employee director who is first elected to
the Board at the company’s annual shareholders meeting, be granted on June 30 of each year (rather than the day after the annual meeting); provided, however, that if the company’s annual shareholders meeting takes place after
June 30, then the related stock unit grants will be granted on the first business day following that meeting. All other components of non-employee director compensation remain unchanged.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Bio-oils Research: Peoria, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    NCAUR Homepage
                    BOR-NCAUR pilot plant facilities
                        Seed pressing and refining equipment
                                    Oil synthesis equipment
                                    Other equipmentSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Peoria, Illinois National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research Bio-oils Research People







Rogers HarryO-Kuruheadline bar Phone: (309) 681-6341Room 1200USDA ARS NCAUR1815 N University St.Peoria IL 61604 ORCID: 0000-0002-8294-9652  Rogers Harry-O'Kuru graduated from Union University in 1977, then received an MS in Chemistry from The University of Alabama-Birmingham, 1980, and a Ph. D. from the University of Memphis in 1988.  After various post-doctoral and assistant professor positions, Rogers joined NCAUR in 1996.  Rogers works for Steven Cermak, where he conducts fundamental research on oil seed components for an understanding of the intrinsic properties of new crop components.  Click to Access my publications.   ProjectsNo projects listed for this employee.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1531

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1998

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

AN ACT

To deauthorize certain portions of the project for navigation,

Bass Harbor, Maine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1531 RFH

1 SECTION 1. BASS HARBOR, MAINE.

2 (a) DEAUTHORIZATION.—The portions of the project

3 for navigation, Bass Harbor, Maine, authorized on May

4 7, 1962, under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act

5 of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), that are described in subsection

6 (b) are not authorized after the date of enactment of this

7 Act.

8 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The portions of the project re9 ferred to in subsection (a) are described as follows:

10 (1) Beginning at a bend in the project,

11 N149040.00, E538505.00, thence running easterly

12 about 50.00 feet along the northern limit of the

13 project to a point N149061.55, E538550.11, thence

14 running southerly about 642.08 feet to a point,

15 N148477.64, E538817.18, thence running south16 westerly about 156.27 feet to a point on the westerly

17 limit of the project, N148348.50, E538737.02,

18 thence running northerly about 149.00 feet along

19 the westerly limit of the project to a bend in the

20 project, N148489.22, E538768.09, thence running

21 northwesterly about 610.39 feet along the westerly

22 limit of the project to the point of origin.

23 (2) Beginning at a point on the westerly limit

24 of the project, N148118.55, E538689.05, thence

25 running southeasterly about 91.92 feet to a point,

26 N148041.43, E538739.07, thence running southerly
3

S 1531 RFH

1 about 65.00 feet to a point, N147977.86,

2 E538725.51, thence running southwesterly about

3 91.92 feet to a point on the westerly limit of the

4 project, N147927.84, E538648.39, thence running

5 northerly about 195.00 feet along the westerly limit

6 of the project to the point of origin.

Passed the Senate June 9, 1998.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JENNIFER HAMMOND, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner 

of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

JUDGMENT 

Civil No.3: 14-cv-01308-TC 

Pursuant to the ORDER signed on December 19, 2015, this action is reversed and 

remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent the identified 

errors of the Administrative Law Judge and for any further proceedings useful in the disability 

determination. 

Dated this 19th day of December 2015. 

Ann Aiken 

United States District Judge 

JUDGMENT 

Case 3:14-cv-01308-TC Document 35 Filed 12/19/15 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF OREGON 

HECTOR FLORES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

6: 14-cv-01374-CL 

ORDER A WARDING 

ATTORNEY FEES 

PURSUANT TO THE 

EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 

Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 u:s.C. § 2412, it is hereby 

ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of$6,176.56 shall be awarded to Plaintiff. If it is determined 

that Plaintiffs EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the 

Treasury's Offset Program, as discussed inAstrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), then the 

check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Max Rae, based upon Plaintiffs assignment of 

these amounts to Plaintiffs attorney. Any check for EAJA fees ·~mailed to Plaintiffs 

counsel, Max Rae, at PO Box 7790, Salem, OR 97~­

DATED this k_ day of ~204 

~·~ 

PRESENTED BY: 

MJ1:; g81344 (503) 363-5424 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Hector Flores 

Page 1. ORDER AWARDING EAJA ATTORNEY FEES -FLORES v. COMMISSIONER, 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 6:14-cv-01374-CL 

Case 6:14-cv-01374-CL Document 29 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:13-cv-00734-MO    Document 31-1    Filed 02/21/14    Page 1 of 6

Case 3:13-cv-00734-MO    Document 31-1    Filed 02/21/14    Page 2 of 6

Case 3:13-cv-00734-MO    Document 31-1    Filed 02/21/14    Page 3 of 6

Case 3:13-cv-00734-MO    Document 31-1    Filed 02/21/14    Page 4 of 6

Case 3:13-cv-00734-MO    Document 31-1    Filed 02/21/14    Page 5 of 6

Case 3:13-cv-00734-MO    Document 31-1    Filed 02/21/14    Page 6 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
) ~
Plaintiff, ) |
re ) “
v. Obs fy...) No, 03 CR 1032 4 Ep
Alin MRD Judge John F. Grady UG y ba
a.
H. MARC WATZMAN, yy, ) slag, Oy
) : we. & ~ Og,
Defendant. ) ST pls
Cony

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY

Defendant, H. MARC WATZMAN, by and through his attorneys, THOMAS
ANTHONY DURKIN, PATRICK W. BLEGEN and JODI L. GARVEY, pursuant to Rule
16(a)(1)(E) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, respectfully requests that the Court enter
its order requiring the government to disclose to the defense a written summary of the testimony
of any expert witnesses that the government intends to use under Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the
Federal Rules of Evidence during its case-in-chief at trial.

While Rule 16 does not set any specific timing requirements for the disclosure of
information under this provision, according to the Amendment notes, it is expected that the
parties will make their requests and disclosures in a timely fashion prior to trial. See, Rule 16,
Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendment (West 2002).

Under the facts and circumstances of this case, including that the government may seek to
rely on expert testimony to establish that real children were used in the production of the images
charged in the indictment, Defendant submits that disclosure of information under this Rule is
necessary at least forty-five (45) days prior to trial to minimize surprise, reduce the need for

continuances, and to provide Defendant with a fair opportunity to test the merits of the expert’s


testimony, or to obtain their own expert. See, United States v. Richmond, 153 F.R.D. 7,8
(D.Mass. 1994); United States v. Palermo, 2001 WL 185132 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). Defendant,
therefore, requests that this Court enter its order requiring the government to comply with Rule
16(a)(1)(E) at least forty-five (45) days prior to trial, and hereby makes this formal demand so as

to insure that his rights in this regard are protected.

i.

Fi
PATRICK W. BLEGEN,

JODYL. RARVEY, Attorndys for
Defehdant.

DURKIN & ROBERTS

53 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 615
Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 913-9300
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 1 of 10

George S May Intl, et al v. Xcentric Ventures, et al Doc. 101

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 101 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 10 of 10