alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM OCWEN ASSET
INVESTMENT CORP'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     220,021,903<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                58,545,498
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             288,308,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          776,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,250
<OTHER-SE>                                 287,340,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               288,308,879
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,482,807<F2>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  388,921<F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,060,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,060,224
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,060,224
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
<FN>
<F1>Tag 10 includes Cash and Amounts due from depository institutions of
$ 503,606 , Interest Bearing Deposits of $ 19,518,297 and Repurchase
Agreements of $ 200,000,000.
<F2>Tag 27 includes Interest Income on Repurchase Agreements and Interest
Bearing Deposits of $ 1,397,128, Securities Available For Sale of
$ 1,005,184 , and Discount Loans of $ 80,495.
<F3>Tag 29 includes Management Fees of $ 341,000 and Loan expenses of $ 47,921
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 10
- 00237
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.R., A.R., A.R., I.R., AND J.R., CHIL DREN

From the County Court at Law Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 77,521
- CCL

MEMORANDUM OPINION
After Appellant’s parental rights to her five children were terminated following a jury trial , Appellant filed a motion for new trial and sought indigent status for appeal. The trial court denied the motion for new trial, found her appeal to be frivolous, and overruled her claim of indigenc e. See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § 263.405(d) (Vernon 2008). Appellant’s counsel then withdrew. We abated this appeal for a hearing in the trial

court to appoint counsel to appeal the trial court’s indigence and frivolousness
determinations if it found that A ppellant ha d not abandoned this appeal

. The trial court appointed counsel for Appellant, and appointed counsel has filed

an Anders brief with us and a motion to withdraw in the trial court. Appointed counsel

asserts that he has diligently reviewed the ava ilable record and the issues in Appellant’sIn the I nterest of M.A.R. Page 2

statement of points and that, in his opinion, the appeal of the trial court’s frivolousness finding is frivolous. 1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967) ; In re E.L.Y. , 69 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2002, order) (applying Anders

to te rmination appeal). Although informed of her right to do so, Appellant did not file a pro se brief or
response to the Anders brief.
In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, [] decide whether the case is wholly frivolous. ” Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400 ; accord Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

- 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)

. An appeal is

“ wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy v. Court of Appeals , 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S. Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed. 2d 440 (1988)

. We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous , w e affirm the trial court’s order of termination

.

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Scoggins Affirmed Opini on delivered and filed May 11 , 2011 [CV06 ]

1 Because none of the issues in the statement of points challenges the sufficiency of the evide nce, the absence of a reporter’s record from the trial does not raise a due

- process concern. See, e.g., In re S.T., 242 S.W.3d 923, 925 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2008, order). Furthermore, appointed counsel has not requested the reporter’s record from the trial. See id. at 925 n.1.
#### Sam Lapides *v.*Department of Public Safety, Division of State Police, et al.

Decided February 21, 1990

*Sam Lapides,*pro se, in support of the petition.

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 818, is denied.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of RC2 Corporation
      (the "Company") certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
      for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated:
      November 9, 2005


/s/
      Curtis W.
      Stoelting


Curtis
      W.
      Stoelting


Chief
      Executive Officer











Dated:
      November 9, 2005


/s/
      Jody L.
      Taylor


Jody
      L.
      Taylor


Chief
      Financial Officer








This
      certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
Exhibit 23.2
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-75275, 333-125671, 333-132803, 333-140107 and 333-155530) and Form S-8 (No. 333-34079, 333-63470,333-116072 and 333-152008) of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. of our reports dated March 25, 2008 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2007 which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our report dated March 25, 2008 included an explanatory paragraph that effective January 1, 2007, Columbia Laboratories, Inc. adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”.
 
 
 /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
 
 McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
 New York, New York
  March 11, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Animas Corporation onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Animas Corporation each herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofAnimas Corporation.
/s/ Katherine D. CrothallKatherine D. Crothall
Case: 1:04-cv-03658 Document #: 47 Filed: 03/20/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:545
Case: 1:04-cv-03658 Document #: 47 Filed: 03/20/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:546
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 94 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 18, 1997.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 412) to approve a settlement agreement between the Bureau of 
Reclamation and the Oroville-Tonasket Irrigation District. The first reading of 
the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill 
and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be 
in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in 
the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT  32.1  &  32.2

      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of HairMax International,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for  the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
A.  Roth,  Chief  Executive Officer, and Michael J. Bongiovanni, Chief Financial
Officer  of  the  Company,  certify  that:

*    the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

*    information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  Edward  A.  Roth
---------------------
Edward  A.  Roth
Director,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

April  13,  2004



/s/  Michael  J.  Bongiovanni
-----------------------------
Edward  A.  Roth
Director  and  Chief  Financial  Officer

April  13,  2004

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of
Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EDWIN DEJESUS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2457

[December 12, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Joseph George Marx, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2008-CF-011701-A.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Louis G. Carres, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. | . |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|

| /s/Stephen J. Hansbrough             |
|--------------------------------------|
| Stephen J. Hansbrough                |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| HearUSA, Inc.                        |
| April 11, 2011                       |
|                                 |
| /s/Francisco Puñal              |
| Francisco Puñal                 |
| Senior Vice President and            |
| Chief Financial Officer              |
| HearUSA, Inc.                        |
| April 11, 2011                       |

----
#### Fourth Avenue Management Corp., Respondent, v Anne S. Brosnahan, Appellant.

—In a summary proceeding to recover possession of an apartment, the occupant Anne S. Brosnahan (1) appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated December 31, 1984, which reversed an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Sparks, J.), dated January 20, 1984, and denied her motion to vacate a default judgment of possession and rent arrears in favor of the petitioner, and (2) purportedly appeals from so much of a subsequent order of the Appellate Term, dated March 19, 1985, as denied that branch of her motion which sought reargument of the appeal from the order of the Civil Court.

Purported appeal from the order dated March 19, 1985, dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument.

Order dated December 31, 1984, affirmed.

Petitioner is awarded one bill of costs.

We agree with the Appellate Term that conspicuous place service of the notice of petition and petition was proper under the circumstances herein *(see,*RPAPL 735 [1]; *Brooklyn Hgts. Realty Co. v Gliwa,*92 AD2d 602; *Eight Assoc. v Hynes,*102 AD2d 746, *affd*65 NY2d 739; *Parkchester Apts. Co. v Hawkins,*111 Misc 2d 896). While the attempt at personal service at the home of the tenant was made during normal working *706hours, the process server’s investigation disclosed that the tenant was usually at home at such time.

The other contentions raised by the tenant are either without merit or based upon documents which are not properly part of the record on appeal. Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Wind Erosion and Water Conservation Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Wind Erosion and Water Conservation Research People & Locations







Holly  Comstock
                        Wind Erosion and Water Conservation Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Aid
                        Phone: (806) 749-5560
                        
                        
                        Fax: (806) 723-5272(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

(i) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 30, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David Wohlberg                   
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | David Wohlberg                       
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Operating Officer
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1477

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide

that certain goods may be reimported into the United States without

additional duty.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8, 1997

Mr. D’AMATO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States to provide that certain goods may be reimported

into the United States without additional duty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REIMPORTATION OF CERTAIN GOODS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 98 of the

5 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new subheading:
2

•S 1477 IS

‘‘ 9801.00.26 Articles, previously imported, with respect

to which the duty was paid upon such previous importation if (1) exported within 3

years after the date of such previous importation, (2) sold for exportation and exported

to individuals for personal use, (3) reimported without having been advanced in

value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means while

abroad, (4) reimported as personal returns

from those individuals, whether or not consolidated with other personal returns prior

to reimportation, and (5) reimported by or

for the account of the person who exported

them from the United States within 1 year

of such exportation ...................................... Free Free ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies to goods described in subheading

3 9801.00.26 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of United

4 States (as added by subsection (a)) that are reimported

5 into the United States on or after the date that is 15 days

6 after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1



April 23, 2003



William O. Hunt

17604 Woods Edge Drive

Dallas, Texas 75287



| | Re: |  | Letter of Credit Security Commitment Agreement dated September 18, 2001 by and between Internet America, Inc. and William O. Hunt (the Hunt Agreement)
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dear Bill:



As you are aware, Internet America has been in discussions with Cindy
Carradine regarding settlement of the judgment rendered against Internet America and the other defendants in the lawsuit styled Cindy Carradine v. Internet America, Inc., Michael T. Maples and William O. Hunt. If the defendants enter into a
settlement agreement with Carradine (a Settlement Agreement), certain amendments to the Hunt Agreement may be necessary or desirable. This letter is intended to amend the Hunt Agreement in accordance with Section 13.6 of the Hunt
Agreement.



If the defendants enter into a Settlement Agreement
with Carradine, you agree to waive Internet Americas obligation to give you thirty days prior written notice of a reduction in commitment, as contained in Section 2.3 of the Hunt Agreement. You agree to allow Internet America to give you
written notice of a reduction in commitment at the time of a Settlement Agreement. Should this occur, the Holders Election Notice, as defined in Section 2.3 of the Hunt Agreement, must be given within 120 days after the date of the Settlement
Agreement, and Internet America will continue to pay you the commitment fee referenced in Section 2.2 of the Hunt Agreement until thirty days after the date of the Settlement Agreement or until the Commitment Termination Date, as defined in Article
1 of the Hunt Agreement, whichever is later. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should the Commitment Termination Date occur after thirty days after the date of a Settlement Agreement, then the Holders Election Notice must be given within 90 days
after the Commitment Termination Date.



If you agree to this
amendment to the Hunt Agreement, please sign below and return the executed original to me at your earliest convenience



INTERNET AMERICA, INC.



/s/ Jack T.
Smith

Jack T. Smith, Chairman and CEO



AGREED:



/s/ William O. Hunt

William O. Hunt

Date: April 23, 2003
Case: 1:02-cv-04822 Document #: 121 Filed: 06/16/04 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:704
Case: 1:02-cv-04822 Document #: 121 Filed: 06/16/04 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:705
Case: 1:02-cv-04822 Document #: 121 Filed: 06/16/04 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:706
Case: 1:02-cv-04822 Document #: 121 Filed: 06/16/04 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:707
Case: 1:02-cv-04822 Document #: 121 Filed: 06/16/04 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:708
Case: 1:02-cv-04822 Document #: 121 Filed: 06/16/04 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:709