Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 154 / Friday, August 13, 2021 / Proposed Rules 44647 

Following analysis of any comments 

received on the amendments in this 

proposed rule, AMS will evaluate all 

available information and determine 

whether to proceed. If appropriate, a 

proposed rule and notice of referendum 

would be issued, and producers would 

be provided the opportunity to vote for 

or against the proposed amendments. 

Information about the referendum, 

including dates and voter eligibility 

requirements, would be published in a 

future issue of the Federal Register. A 

final rule would then be issued to 

effectuate any amendments favored by 

producers participating in the 

referendum. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: https://

www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/ 

moa/small-businesses. Any questions 

about the compliance guide should be 

sent to Richard Lower at the previously 

mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

General Findings 

Findings hereinafter set forth are 

supplementary to findings and 

determinations that were previously 

made in connection with the issuance of 

Marketing Order 925; and all said 

previous findings and determinations 

are hereby ratified and affirmed, except 

insofar as such findings and 

determinations may be in conflict with 

the findings and determinations set 

forth herein. 

1. Marketing Order 925, as hereby 

proposed to be amended, and all terms 

and conditions thereof, would tend to 

effectuate the declared policy of the Act; 

2. Marketing Order 925, as hereby 

proposed to be amended, regulates the 

handling of grapes grown in 

southeastern California and is 

applicable only to persons in respective 

classes of commercial and industrial 

activity specified in the Order; 

3. Marketing Order 925, as hereby 

proposed to be amended, is limited in 

application to the smallest regional 

production area which is practicable, 

consistent with carrying out the 

declared policy of the Act, and the 

issuance of several marketing orders 

applicable to subdivisions of the 

production area would not effectively 

carry out the declared policy of the Act; 

4. Marketing Order 925, as hereby 

proposed to be amended, prescribes, 

insofar as practicable, such different 

terms applicable to different parts of the 

production area as are necessary to give 

due recognition to the differences in the 

production and marketing of grapes 

produced or packed in the production 

area; and 

5. All handling of grapes produced or 

packed in the production area, as 

defined in Marketing Order 925, is in 

the current of interstate or foreign 

commerce or directly burdens, 

obstructs, or affects such commerce. 

A 60-day comment period is provided 

to allow interested persons to respond 

to these proposals. Any comments 

received on amendments proposed in 

this rule will be analyzed, and if AMS 

determines to proceed based on all the 

information presented, a producer 

referendum would be conducted to 

determine producer support for the 

proposed amendments. If appropriate, a 

final rule would then be issued to 

effectuate the amendments favored by 

producers participating in the 

referendum. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925 

Grapes, Marketing agreements, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

For reasons set forth in the preamble, 

7 CFR part 925 is proposed to be 

amended as follows: 

PART 925—GRAPES GROWN IN A 

DESIGNATED AREA OF 

SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA. 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 925 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

■ 2. In § 925.20, revise paragraph (a) to 

read as follows: 

§ 925.20 Establishment and membership. 

(a) There is hereby established a 

California Desert Grape Committee 

consisting of 10 members, each of whom 

shall have an alternate who shall have 

the same qualifications as the member. 

Four members and their alternates shall 

be producers, officers or employees of 

producers (producer members). Four 

members and their alternates shall be 

handlers, or officers or employees of 

handlers (handler members). One 

member and alternate shall be either a 

producer or handler, or an officer or 

employee thereof. One member and 

alternate shall represent the public. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. In § 925.30, revise paragraph (a) to 

read as follows: 

§ 925.30 Procedure. 

(a) Six members of the committee 

shall constitute a quorum, including at 

a minimum one producer representative 

and one handler representative, and any 

action of the committee shall require at 

least six concurring votes; 

* * * * * 

Erin Morris, 

Associate Administrator, Agricultural 

Marketing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17233 Filed 8–12–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Part 930 

[Doc. No. AMS–SC21–0026; SC21–930–1 

PR] 

Tart Cherries Grown in the States of 

Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, 

Oregon, Utah, Washington, and 

Wisconsin; Changes to Reporting 

Requirements 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would 

implement a recommendation from the 

Cherry Industry Administrative Board to 

revise reporting requirements prescribed 

under the Federal marketing order 

regulating the handling of tart cherries. 

This action would modify reporting 

requirements to include information 

necessary to determine the portion of 

total inventory that is greater than five 

years old. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

September 13, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments 

concerning this proposal. Comments 

must be submitted via the internet at: 

http://www.regulations.gov. All 

comments should reference the 

document number and the date and 

page number of this issue of the Federal 

Register. All comments submitted in 

response to this proposed rule will be 

included in the record and the identity 

of the individuals or entities submitting 

the comments will be made public on 

the internet at the address provided 

above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas F. Nalepa, Marketing Specialist, 

or Christian D. Nissen, Regional 

Director, Southeast Marketing Field 

Office, Marketing Order and Agreement 

Division, Specialty Crops Program, 

AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324– 

3375, Fax: (863) 291–8614, or email: 

Thomas.Nalepa@usda.gov or 

Christian.Nissen@usda.gov. 

Small businesses may request 

information on complying with this 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
44648 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 154 / Friday, August 13, 2021 / Proposed Rules 

regulation by contacting Richard Lower, 

Marketing Order and Agreement 

Division, Specialty Crops Program, 

AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 

Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, 

DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– 

2491, or Email: Richard.Lower@

usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, 

proposes an amendment to regulations 

issued to carry out a marketing order as 

defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed 

rule is issued under Marketing 

Agreement and Order No. 930, (7 CFR 

part 930), regulating the handling of tart 

cherries produced in the States of 

Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, 

Oregon, Utah, Washington, and 

Wisconsin. Part 930 (referred to as the 

‘‘Order’’) is effective under the 

Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act 

of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), 

hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The 

Cherry Industry Administrative Board 

(Board or CIAB) locally administers the 

Order and is comprised of producers 

and handlers of tart cherries operating 

within the production area, and a public 

member. 

The Department of Agriculture 

(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in 

conformance with Executive Orders 

12866 and 13563. Executive Orders 

12866 and 13563 direct agencies to 

assess all costs and benefits of available 

regulatory alternatives and, if regulation 

is necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts and equity). 

Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the 

importance of quantifying both costs 

and benefits, reducing costs, 

harmonizing rules, and promoting 

flexibility. This action falls within a 

category of regulatory actions that the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) exempted from Executive Order 

12866 review. 

This proposed rule has been reviewed 

under Executive Order 13175— 

Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments, which 

requires agencies to consider whether 

their rulemaking actions would have 

tribal implications. Agricultural 

Marketing Service (AMS) has 

determined that this proposed rule is 

unlikely to have substantial direct 

effects on one or more Indian tribes, on 

the relationship between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

This proposed rule has been reviewed 

under Executive Order 13175— 

Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments, which 

requires agencies to consider whether 

their rulemaking actions would have 

tribal implications. Agricultural 

Marketing Service (AMS) has 

determined that this proposed rule is 

unlikely to have substantial direct 

effects on one or more Indian tribes, on 

the relationship between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

This proposed rule has been reviewed 

under Executive Order 12988, Civil 

Justice Reform. This proposed rule is 

not intended to have retroactive effect. 

The Act provides that administrative 

proceedings must be exhausted before 

parties may file suit in court. Under 

section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any 

handler subject to an order may file 

with USDA a petition stating that the 

order, any provision of the order, or any 

obligation imposed in connection with 

the order is not in accordance with law 

and request a modification of the order 

or to be exempted therefrom. Such 

handler is afforded the opportunity for 

a hearing on the petition. After the 

hearing, USDA would rule on the 

petition. The Act provides that the 

district court of the United States in any 

district in which the handler is an 

inhabitant, or has his or her principal 

place of business, has jurisdiction to 

review USDA’s ruling on the petition, 

provided an action is filed not later than 

20 days after the date of the entry of the 

ruling. 

This action would revise the reporting 

requirements to include the sales and 

inventory information necessary to 

segregate between inventory that is five 

years old from inventory is less than 

five years old. This modification would 

allow the industry to better estimate 

how much inventory on-hand is still 

marketable and help ensure relevant 

inventory information is available when 

considering volume restrictions. This 

proposal was unanimously 

recommended by the Board at its 

February 25, 2021 meeting. 

Section 930.70 of the Order provides, 

in part, authority to require handlers to 

submit reports of inventory. Section 

930.70 further provides, with the 

approval of the Secretary, authority for 

the Board to collect other such 

information from handlers as needed to 

perform its duties. This proposed rule 

would utilize this authority to establish 

a new § 930.170 under the rules and 

regulations of the Order. This new 

section would codify existing inventory 

reporting requirements and require 

handlers of tart cherries to annually 

report inventory that exceeds five years 

of age. 

During Board meetings held on June 

25, 2020 and January 14, 2021, the 

Board received industry feedback about 

enhancing tart cherry inventory 

transparency and developing a clearer 

understanding of the age of product in 

inventory. In these discussions, several 

members expressed concern that some 

of the inventory currently being 

reported may be product beyond its 

saleable date, which could create a 

misleading view of the actual amount of 

tart cherries available for market. 

Currently, handlers submit inventory 

reports four times per year for reporting 

periods ending November 30, February 

28, May 31, and June 30, with reports 

for those periods due on December 10, 

March 10, June 10, and July 10, 

respectively. This information is 

submitted on CIAB Form 3 (Sales/ 

Inventory Report) as previously 

approved by OMB and assigned OMB 

No. 0581–0177. The report includes 

information on the type, form, and the 

amount of product, but does not include 

data regarding the age of products in 

inventory. The Board agreed that 

existing reporting requirements may 

limit their knowledge of the industry’s 

on-hand tart cherry inventory and 

formed a subcommittee to review 

inventory reporting requirements. 

The Board reviewed the 

subcommittee findings at the January 

14, 2021, meeting, and expressed 

support for the subcommittee’s 

recommendation to adjust reporting 

requirements to account for inventory 

greater than five years old. The Board 

noted a five-year inventory cutoff date 

was appropriate because this period 

would sufficiently accommodate 

lifespans of nearly all existing products 

likely to be inventoried. Board members 

agreed having this additional 

information regarding the age of 

inventory would be beneficial. 

The Order includes the authority for 

establishing volume regulation, and one 

element considered during those 

discussions is the amount of tart 

cherries available in inventory. The 

regulated season runs from July 1 

through June 30. The current reporting 

aggregates the industry’s inventory data 

and does not separately track older 

inventory, and this compilation could 

provide an incomplete view of the 

industry’s marketable inventory. By 

segregating the accounting of inventory 

older than five years, the Board would 

have more precise information regarding 

inventory when discussing market 

issues. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 154 / Friday, August 13, 2021 / Proposed Rules 44649 

As part of their discussions, the Board 

also provided clarifying information on 

how to calculate inventory age for 

reporting purposes. To determine 

product age, the date used would either 

be the date of harvest and processing or 

date of remanufacturing. Board 

members emphasized the starting point 

for calculating inventory age would be 

reset if the inventory were 

remanufactured into a new product. 

For example, if a handler was 

completing their routine inventory 

report on May 31, 2021, any tart cherries 

harvested in 2014 or earlier would be 

considered over five years old. Although 

cherries harvested in 2014 would be 

considered part of the 2014–15 harvest 

year, based on the date they were 

harvested and processed, they would be 

greater than five years old for reporting 

purposes by the end of May 2021. If 

cherries harvested in 2014 were 

remanufactured into another product, 

the date of remanufacturing would 

become the date used for calculating the 

age for inventory purposes. The Board 

stated this is the same dating procedure 

as used for calculating the age of 

cherries held in reserve under volume 

regulation. Using these dates, inventory 

older than five years would be reported 

each May on the modified report. 

Several members commented the age 

of inventory is already recorded by 

handlers as part of their normal 

business activities, and as a result, this 

requirement would not be overly 

burdensome. Members further 

expressed the separate reporting of 

inventory over five years old would, at 

most, require a few extra minutes of a 

handler’s time and would only be 

required once annually. 

Consequently, the Board voted to add 

a section to the inventory report to 

include the total volume of inventory 

over five years old. The Board 

recommended including this 

information on the inventory report for 

the reporting period ending May 31 due 

on June 10. The Board agreed this was 

the appropriate time to have the 

information available as this report 

would be used to develop the industry 

inventory data when the Board meets in 

June to consider the need to establish a 

volume control recommendation for the 

coming season. 

This proposed rule would add sales 

and inventory report requirements to 

administrative provisions under the 

Order and would require handlers to 

report inventory older than five years. 

These reporting requirements would be 

added in a new § 930.170 and would 

include information on the handler 

submitting the form; the reporting 

period; beginning inventory for each 

product; the amount packed for each 

product; sales; information on transfers 

of product between handlers, including 

the name of the selling handler, name of 

the receiving handler, and form type, 

number of units; information on product 

repacked or remanufactured during the 

reporting period, including form type 

and number of units of source products 

and form type and number of units of 

end products; and information on the 

amount of ending inventory for each 

product, including the amount of 

ending inventory for each product over 

five years old. Only the May 31 report 

would require handlers to record 

amounts of inventories over five years 

old. 

This information would support the 

industry’s ability to make marketing 

decisions by providing more descriptive 

information than currently available 

when evaluating the need for volume 

regulation. Besides providing important 

information for industry reports 

regarding sales and inventory, this 

action would also help ensure 

compliance with this reporting 

requirement by including it in the rules 

and regulations under the Order. 

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

Pursuant to requirements set forth in 

the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 

U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered 

the economic impact of this proposed 

rule on small entities. Accordingly, 

AMS has prepared this initial regulatory 

flexibility analysis. 

The purpose of the RFA is to fit 

regulatory actions to the scale of 

businesses subject to such actions in 

order that small businesses will not be 

unduly or disproportionately burdened. 

Marketing orders issued pursuant to the 

Act are unique in that they are brought 

about through group action of 

essentially small entities acting on their 

own behalf. 

There are approximately 450 

producers of tart cherries in the 

regulated area and approximately 40 

handlers who are subject to the Order. 

Small agricultural growers are defined 

by the Small Business Administration as 

those having annual receipts less than 

$1,000,000, and small agricultural 

service firms are defined as those whose 

annual receipts are less than 

$30,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201). 

According to information from the 

National Agricultural Statistics Service 

(NASS) and Board data, the average 

annual grower price for tart cherries 

during the 2019–2020 season was 

approximately $0.15 per pound. With 

total utilization at 236.34 million 

pounds, the total 2019–20 crop value is 

estimated at $35.45 million (236.34 

million pounds times $0.15). Dividing 

the crop value by the estimated number 

of producers (450) yields an estimated 

average receipt per producer of $78,778. 

This is well below the SBA threshold 

for small producers. 

A free-on-board (FOB) price of $0.82 

per pound for processed tart cherries 

was derived from USDA’s 2020 

purchases of dried tart cherries at an 

average price of $4.11 per pound. The 

dried cherry price was converted to a 

raw product equivalent price at an 

industry recognized ratio of five to one. 

Based on utilization, this price 

represents a good estimate of the price 

for processed cherries. Multiplying this 

FOB price ($0.82) by total utilization of 

236.34 million pounds results in an 

estimated handler-level tart cherry value 

of $193.8 million. Dividing this figure 

by the number of handlers (40) yields 

estimated average annual handler 

receipts of $4.84 million, which is 

below the SBA threshold for small 

agricultural service firms. Assuming a 

normal distribution, the majority of 

producers and handlers of tart cherries 

may be classified as small entities. 

This proposed rule would add the 

sales and inventory report requirements 

to the administrative provisions under 

the Order and would require handlers to 

report inventory older than five years. 

This proposed rule would establish a 

new § 930.170 under the rules and 

regulations of the Order. The authority 

for this proposed action is provided in 

§ 930.70 of the Order. 

AMS anticipates that this proposed 

rule would impose minimal, if any, 

additional costs on handlers or growers, 

regardless of their size. This action 

would impose a small increase in the 

reporting burden for each tart cherry 

handler. However, because handlers 

currently maintain data about the age of 

their inventory in the regular course of 

business, they should be able to readily 

access this information. Consequently, 

any additional costs associated with this 

change would be minimal (not 

significant) and apply equally to all 

handlers. 

This proposed action should also 

benefit the entire industry by providing 

more precise information on tart cherry 

product in inventory. This information 

would provide accurate information 

regarding available inventory and help 

with marketing and planning for the 

industry. Further, having these 

requirements codified under the rules 

and regulations would also benefit 

compliance enforcement of this 

reporting requirement. The benefits of 

this rule are expected to be equally 

available to all tart cherry growers and 

handlers, regardless of their size. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
44650 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 154 / Friday, August 13, 2021 / Proposed Rules 

The Board discussed other 

alternatives to this proposed action, 

including reporting inventory older than 

three years for the purposes of 

classifying the age of inventory, 

reporting the age of inventory quarterly, 

and leaving the current reporting 

requirements unchanged. When 

discussing alternatives, the Board 

concluded a three-year timeframe would 

not sufficiently cover the normal 

lifespan of all products held in 

inventory. The Board also commented 

that quarterly reporting of older 

inventory was unnecessary because this 

information would be most useful at the 

end of the season, prior to making 

annual volume restriction 

recommendations. Therefore, the 

alternatives were rejected. 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), the Order’s information 

collection requirements have been 

previously approved by OMB and 

assigned OMB No. 0581–0177, Tart 

Cherries Grown in the States of 

Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, 

Oregon, Utah, Washington, and 

Wisconsin. This proposed rule would 

require changes to the Board’s existing 

CIAB Form 3. However, changes are 

minor and the currently approved 

burden for the form would be minimally 

increased by the proposed changes. The 

revised form has been submitted to 

OMB for approval. 

As with all Federal marketing order 

programs, reports and forms are 

periodically reviewed to reduce 

information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public 

sector agencies. USDA has not 

identified any relevant Federal rules 

that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with 

this proposed rule. 

AMS is committed to complying with 

the E-Government Act, to promote the 

use of the internet and other 

information technologies to provide 

increased opportunities for citizen 

access to Government information and 

services, and for other purposes. 

Further, Board meetings are widely 

publicized throughout the tart cherry 

industry. Meetings are public and 

virtual or in a hybrid style with 

participants having a choice whether to 

attend in person or virtually. All 

interested persons are invited to attend 

meetings and participate in Board 

deliberations on all issues. Board 

meetings on June 25, 2020, January 14, 

2021, and February 25, 2021, were each 

conducted via videoconference. All 

entities, both large and small, were able 

to express views on this issue. Finally, 

interested persons are invited to submit 

comments on this proposed rule, 

including regulatory and information 

collection impacts of this proposed 

action on small businesses. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ 

rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. 

Any questions about the compliance 

guide should be sent to Richard Lower 

at the previously mentioned address in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section. 

A 30-day comment period is provided 

to allow interested persons to respond 

to this proposal. All written comments 

timely received will be considered 

before a final determination is made on 

this matter. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930 

Marketing agreements, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Tart 

cherries. 

For reasons set forth in the preamble, 

7 CFR part 930 is proposed to be 

amended as follows: 

PART 930—TART CHERRIES GROWN 

IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW 

YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON, 

UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND 

WISCONSIN 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 930 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

■ 2. Add § 930.170 to read as follows: 

§ 930.170 Sales and Inventory Report. 

(a) Handlers shall submit to the Board 

a sales and inventory report for the 

reporting period ending November 30, 

February 28, May 31, and June 30 of 

each crop year. Handlers shall file such 

reports by the tenth day of the month 

following the reporting period, 

December 10, March 10, June 10, and 

July 10, respectively. Should the filing 

due date fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or 

federal holiday, reports are due by the 

first business day following the due 

date. Such reports shall be reported to 

the Board on CIAB Form 3 and include: 

(1) The name, address, telephone 

number, and identifying number of the 

handler; 

(2) The reporting period covered by 

the report; 

(3) The form, type, and unit size for 

each product; 

(4) The total beginning of year 

inventory for each product; 

(5) The packed amount for each 

product; 

(6) Total inter-handler transfers, and 

total volume repackaged or 

remanufactured for each product, yearto-date; 

(7) Total sales outside the industry for 

each product, year-to-date; 

(8) The amount of ending inventory 

for each product, year-to-date; 

(9) List of inter-handler transfers, both 

in and out, during the reporting period 

including: 

(i) Name of the selling handler; 

(ii) Name of the receiving handler; 

and 

(iii) Form, type, number of units. 

(10) List of repacks and 

remanufactures during the reporting 

period including: 

(i) Form, type, and number of units of 

source products; and 

(ii) Form, type, and number of units 

of end products. 

(b) The amount of inventory for each 

product over 5 years old shall be 

reported annually on the sales and 

inventory report for the reporting period 

ending May 31. Product age is based on 

the crop year in which the current 

product was processed or 

remanufactured. 

Erin Morris, 

Associate Administrator, Agricultural 

Marketing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17234 Filed 8–12–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

10 CFR Part 72 

[NRC–2021–0108] 

RIN 3150–AK64 

List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage 

Casks: TN Americas, LLC, 

Standardized Advanced NUHOMS®

Horizontal Modular Storage System, 

Certificate of Compliance No. 1029, 

Renewal of Initial Certificate and 

Amendment Nos. 1, 3, and 4 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is proposing to 

amend its spent fuel storage regulations 

by revising the TN Americas, LLC, 

Standardized Advanced NUHOMS®

Horizontal Modular Storage System 

listing within the ‘‘List of approved 

spent fuel storage casks’’ to renew, for 

an additional 40 years, the initial 

certificate and Amendment Nos. 1, 3, 

and 4 of Certificate of Compliance No. 

1029. The renewal of the initial 

certificate and Amendment Nos. 1, 3, 

and 4 revises the certificate of 

compliance’s conditions and technical 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS