alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

KEVIN TRUDEAU, 

 Defendant, 

THE LAW OFFICES OF MARC LANE, 

PC,

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 03-C-3904

Hon. Robert W. Gettleman 

MOTION TO COMPEL THE LAW OFFICES OF MARC LANE TO DISCLOSE 

INFORMATION REGARDING TRUDEAU’S ASSET PROTECTION PLAN
2

MOTION TO COMPEL THE LAW OFFICES OF MARC LANE TO DISCLOSE 

INFORMATION REGARDING TRUDEAU’S ASSET PROTECTION PLAN

Pursuant to Federal Rules 37, 45 and 69, and Paragraph XVI of the Stipulated Final 

Order (Sept. 3, 2004) (DE56), Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) moves to compel

Respondent Law Offices of Marc Lane (“Lane”) to disclose all information responsive to the 

FTC’s 30(b)(6) subpoena seeking documents and testimony concerning Trudeau’s asset 

protection plan. The accompanying brief supports this motion. 
3

Dated: April 15, 2013

David O’Toole (dotoole@ftc.gov)

Federal Trade Commission

55 West Monroe Street, Suite 1825

Chicago, Illinois 60603-5001 

Phone: (312) 960-5601

Fax: (312) 960-5600

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Jonathan Cohen

Michael Mora (mmora@ftc.gov) 

Jonathan Cohen (jcohen2@ftc.gov)

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. M-8102B

Washington, DC 20580

Phone: 202-326-3373; -2551

Fax: 202-326-2558
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jonathan Cohen, hereby certify that on April 15, 2013, I caused to be

served true copies of the foregoing by electronic means, by filing such documents through the 

Court’s Electronic Case Filing System, which will send notification of such filing to:

Kimball Richard Anderson

kanderson@winston.com

Thomas Lee Kirsch, II

tkirsch@winston.com

Katherine E. Croswell

kcroswell@winston.com

Daniel J. Donnellon

ddonnellon@ficlaw.com

Kenjiro D. LeCroix

klecroix@ficlaw.com

Patrick E. Deady

ped@hmlaw.com

Evan J. Haim

ejh@hmlaw.com

/s/ Jonathan Cohen Jonathan Cohen (jcohen2@ftc.gov) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Federal Trade Commission
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,516,000               3,532,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              175,851,000              95,108,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                20,590,000              13,114,000
<INVENTORY>                                 52,267,000              16,251,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            81,341,000              27,813,000
<PP&E>                                      38,293,000              22,281,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,037,000               4,861,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             267,858,000             127,227,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,247,000              10,212,000
<BONDS>                                     89,846,000              25,670,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       133,000                 113,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 138,558,000              81,373,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               267,858,000             127,227,000
<SALES>                                    100,281,000              51,963,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           119,409,000              63,871,000
<CGS>                                       16,154,000               5,131,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               78,462,000              36,612,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            12,346,000               8,048,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,088,000               3,843,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             23,513,000              15,368,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,019,000               5,687,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,494,000               9,681,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,494,000               9,681,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16                    1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14                    1.04
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MELADEE HEADRICK Case No. 3:14-cv-00790-MA 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

Defendant. 

MARSH, Judge 

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

On June 15, 2015, plaintiff filed an Unopposed Application for 

Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2412(d), in which parties agree that plaintiff should be awarded 

fees in the amount of $5,644.78. (ECF No. 20). 

Accordingly, based on the agreement of the parties, it is 

hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $5,644.78 shall 

be awarded to plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice 

Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. There are no costs or expenses. The parties 

agree that attorney fees will be paid to plaintiff's attorney, 

subject to verification that plaintiff does not have a debt which 

qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the 

1 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

Case 3:14-cv-00790-MA Document 23 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 2
Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. 

Ct. 2521 (2010). 

If plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made 

out to plaintiff's attorney, Merrill Schneider, at Mr. Schneider's 

address: PO Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. If plaintiff has a debt, 

then the check for any remaining funds after off set of the debt 

shall be made out to plaintiff and mailed to plaintiff's attorney's 

office at the address stated above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ~ day of June, 2015. 

Malcolm 

m~~m~ F. Marsh 

United States District Judge 

2 - ORDER FOR EAJA FEES 

Case 3:14-cv-00790-MA Document 23 Filed 06/29/15 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted**


**pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eclipsys Corporation
      (the
“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, R.
      Andrew Eckert, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 7, 2007





/s/
      R.
      Andrew Eckert


R.
      Andrew
      Eckert


President
      and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 19, 2002                       /s/ ROBERT E. MEAD
                                           --------------------------
                                           Robert E. Mead
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.37
                                IRREVOCABLE PROXY

                              Date: April 15, 1999

         The undersigned hereby appoints MVII, LLC, a California limited
liability company ("MVII"), proxy, and hereby authorizes MVII to vote all of the
common shares (the "Common Shares") of DSI Toys, Inc. (the "Company") (i)
standing in the name of the undersigned as of the date hereof, (ii) that may
subsequently be acquired by the undersigned, and (iii) as to which the
undersigned is or may be appointed as proxy and has the authority to vote, for
the election of the Board of Directors of the Company as if the undersigned were
personally present and voting for such directors. The undersigned further grants
MVII the authority to vote all such Common Shares with respect to all other
matters of the Company subject to a vote of the Company's common shareholders,
however the undersigned shall retain the right to vote his or her Common Shares
with respect to matters concerning (i) a dissolution of the Company, or (ii) the
sale of a Controlling Interest (as hereinafter defined) of the Company. This is
an irrevocable proxy coupled with an interest and is granted in furtherance of
that certain Shareholders' and Voting Agreement (the "Agreement"), by and among
the Company, MVII and the undersigned and the other members of the DSI Group (as
defined in the Agreement), dated as of even date herewith. This irrevocable
proxy shall become effective and shall have the same duration as the voting
agreement found in Article I of the Agreement and shall automatically terminate
if and when the Agreement is terminated for any reason. "Controlling Interest"
shall mean the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company
which requires a vote of shareholders under applicable law, the issuance by the
Company of common stock in such an amount that the rules of the exchange on
which the Company's stock is listed requires shareholder approval, or a merger
of the Company with another entity which requires a vote of shareholders under
applicable law.


                                                 /s/ Douglas A. Smith
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Douglas A. Smith
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sustainable Agricultural Water Systems Research: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Information
                        Final ReportsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Sustainable Agricultural Water Systems Research People & Locations







Susan M Glasser
                        Sustainable Agricultural Water Systems Research

                        




                        
                        PHYSICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN
                        Phone: (530) 754-3351
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41002

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELOY LAURO ALANIZ-ELIZONDO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-97-CR-119-1 

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eloy Lauro Alaniz-Elizondo appeals his guilty-plea

sentencing for reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a) and (b). He argues that he was charged with and

pleaded guilty to simple reentry, § 1326(a), but was sentenced as

if he had pleaded guilty to reentry following a felony conviction

pursuant to § 1326(b)(2). His argument is foreclosed by this

court’s opinion in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera, 999 F.2d 943,
No. 

-2-

946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50722 Summary Calendar

JUNE GOFF, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-97-CV-204

- - - - - - - - - - February 22, 1999 Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * June Lee Goff, Texas prisoner #731056, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)’s one-year limitations period. The district court did not address the merits of Goff’s petition. Goff contends that his § 2254 petition was timely filed because his state habeas application tolled the limitations period.No. 98-50722 -2- Because Goff’s petition was dismissed as time-barred, in order for him to obtain a COA, he must make a credible showingthat the district court erred in dismissing his petition as timebarred. See Sonnier v. Johnson , 161 F.3d 941, 943-46 (5th Cir. 1998). There is a one-year grace period, commencing on April 24, 1996 (the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act) for the filing of § 2254 petitions, and petitions filed before or on April 24, 1997, are considered timely. Flanagan v. Johnson , 154 F.3d 196, 200-02 (5th Cir. 1998). Also, the period of time a properly filed state habeas petition is pending tolls the limitations period and the one-year grace period. See Fields v. Johnson , 159 F.3d 914, 915-16 (5th Cir. 1998). The district court determined that Goff had filed his state habeas application on February 6, 1997, and that the application was denied on March 19, 1997. The period of time the state habeas application was pending was 42 days, and the one-year grace period for Goff’s filing of his § 2254 petition was extended by 42 days, thus making his petition due by June 5, 1997. Goff’s petition was stamped filed by the district court on June 5, 1997. Goff’s petition was timely filed, and he has made a credible showing that the district court erred. Accordingly, COA is GRANTED, the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1232

To provide for the declassification of the journal kept by Glenn T. Seaborg

while serving as Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1997

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide for the declassification of the journal kept by

Glenn T. Seaborg while serving as Chairman of the

Atomic Energy Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 (1) Whereas Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg is a truly great

5 American who has made indispensable contributions in the

6 development of nuclear energy.

7 (2) Whereas Dr. Seaborg is the co-discoverer of plu8 tonium and eight other elements and as a result of these

9 discoveries was awarded the 1951 Nobel Prize for chem10 istry.
2

S 1232 IS

1 (3) Whereas while serving as Chairman of the Atomic

2 Energy Commission (AEC), Dr. Seaborg maintained a

3 journal consisting of a diary, correspondence, announce4 ments, minutes of meetings, and other documents of his5 torical value.

6 (4) Whereas in preparing the journal, Dr. Seaborg

7 took care to include only information which was not classi8 fied and could be made public.

9 (5) Whereas before leaving the Atomic Energy Com10 mission, Dr. Seaborg submitted the journal to the AEC’s

11 Division of Classification for review.

12 (6) Whereas Dr. Seaborg’s journal was cleared by the

13 Division of Classification, virtually without deletion.

14 (7) Whereas twelve years later, in 1983, the chief his15 torian at the Department of Energy asked to borrow a

16 copy of Dr. Seaborg’s journal in order to write a history

17 of the AEC.

18 (8) Whereas when the journal was returned to Dr.

19 Seaborg three years later, passage after passage was re20 dacted, including explicitly public information, such as the

21 published code names of nuclear weapons tests, and purely

22 personal material, such as his description of accompanying

23 his children on a ‘‘trick or treat’’ outing one Halloween

24 evening.
3

S 1232 IS

1 SEC. 2. DECLASSIFICATION OF SEABORG JOURNAL.

2 The Secretary of Energy shall return to Dr. Glenn

3 T. Seaborg his journal which the prepared while serving

4 as Chairman of he AEC. The journal shall be returned

5 in the original, unredacted form in which it was lent to

6 the Department of Energy in 1983.

Æ
# Úřední věstník C 199/2008

| | ISSN 1725-5163 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 199 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 515. srpna 2008 |

ISSN 1725-5163

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 199

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 515. srpna 2008

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Usnesení, doporučení a stanoviska |
| | STANOVISKA |
| | Účetní dvůr |
| 2008/C 199/01 | Stanovisko č. 3/2008 Účetního dvora Evropských společenství k návrhu nařízení Rady, kterým se mění nařízení (Euratom, ESUO, EHS) č. 549/69, kterým se stanoví kategorie úředníků a ostatních zaměstnanců Evropských společenství, na které se vztahují ustanovení článku 12, čl. 13 druhého pododstavce a článku 14 Protokolu o výsadách a imunitách Společenství | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

I   Usnesení, doporučení a stanoviska

STANOVISKA

Účetní dvůr

2008/C 199/01

Stanovisko č. 3/2008 Účetního dvora Evropských společenství k návrhu nařízení Rady, kterým se mění nařízení (Euratom, ESUO, EHS) č. 549/69, kterým se stanoví kategorie úředníků a ostatních zaměstnanců Evropských společenství, na které se vztahují ustanovení článku 12, čl. 13 druhého pododstavce a článku 14 Protokolu o výsadách a imunitách Společenství

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

I Usnesení, doporučení a stanoviska

STANOVISKA

Účetní dvůr

| 5.8.2008 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2008

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 199/1

---

STANOVISKO č. 3/2008

Účetního dvora Evropských společenství k návrhu nařízení Rady, kterým se mění nařízení (Euratom, ESUO, EHS) č. 549/69, kterým se stanoví kategorie úředníků a ostatních zaměstnanců Evropských společenství, na které se vztahují ustanovení článku 12, čl. 13 druhého pododstavce a článku 14 Protokolu o výsadách a imunitách Společenství

(2008/C 199/01)

ÚČETNÍ DVŮR EVROPSKÝCH SPOLEČENSTVÍ,

s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství, a zejména na čl. 248 odst. 4 a článek 291 této smlouvy,

s ohledem na Protokol o výsadách a imunitách Evropských společenství, a zejména na článek 16 tohoto protokolu,

s ohledem na návrh Komise ze dne 23. května 2008 (1),

s ohledem na žádost Rady o stanovisko k tomuto návrhu, kterou Účetní dvůr obdržel dne 6. června 2008,

vzhledem k tomu, že účelem návrhu Komise je, aby se na úředníky Europolu v rámci jejich účasti ve společných vyšetřovacích týmech vytvořených členskými státy pro trestní řízení spadající do působnosti Europolu nevztahovala právní imunita,

PŘIJAL TOTO STANOVISKO:

Navrhovaná změna, která stanoví, že na zaměstnance Europolu pověřené spoluprací se společnými vyšetřovacími týmy se nevztahuje právní imunita, nevyžaduje, aby se k ní Účetní dvůr vyjadřoval.

Toto stanovisko přijal Účetní dvůr v Lucemburku na svém zasedání dne 17. července 2008.

Za Účetní dvůr

Vítor Manuel DA SILVA CALDEIRA

předseda

---

(1)  KOM(2008) 305 v konečném znění ze dne 23. května 2008.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eclipsys
Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), the undersigned, R. Andrew Eckert, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 7, 2009



/s/    R. Andrew EckertR. Andrew EckertPresident and Chief Executive Officer