alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Revised 03/11/2008

Case Number: Assigned/Issued By:

Judge Name: Designated Magistrate Judge:

FEE INFORMATION

Amount Due: $350.00 $39.00 $5.00

IFP No Fee Other _____________

 $455.00

 

Number of Service Copies ___________ Date: ______________________

(For use by Fiscal Department Only)

Amount Paid: _______________ Receipt #: __________________

Date Payment Rec’d: _____________ Fiscal Clerk: ________________

ISSUANCES

Summons Alias Summons

Third Party Summons Lis Pendens

Non Wage Garnishment Summons Abstract of Judgment

___________________________

 Wage-Deduction Garnishment Summons ___________________________

 (Victim, Against and $ Amount)

 Citation to Discover Assets

 Other

Writ _______________________ _______________________

 (Type of Writ) _______________________

(Type of issuance)

 ______Original and __________ copies on ________________ as to ____________________________

 (Date)

 ____________________________________________________________________________________

 ____________________________________________________________________________________

Case: 1:04-cr-00778 Document #: 681 Filed: 01/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2187
#### GAYLORD, Respondent, v. WOODRUFF et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March, 1896.)

Action by Eleanor D. Gaylord, as administratrix o£ Ann C. Bradford, deceased, against Caroline B. Woodruff and others, as executors of the will of Nelson Beardsley, deceased.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Case: 1:03-cv-05833 Document #: 7 Filed: 08/20/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:37
Case: 1:03-cv-05833 Document #: 7 Filed: 08/20/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:38
Case: 1:03-cv-05833 Document #: 7 Filed: 08/20/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:39
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

MAY 23 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

SUSAN HUITT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

OPTUM HEALTH SERVICES, a 

wholly-owned subsidiary of UNITED 

HEALTH GROUP, INC.,,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 16-36007

D.C. No. 3:14-cv-01064-BR

U.S. District Court for Oregon, 

Portland

ORDER

A review of the docket demonstrates that appellant has failed to file the 

opening brief in this case.

Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to 

prosecute. 

This order served on the district court shall constitute the mandate of this 

court.

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: Estela Urrutia

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 3:14-cv-01064-BR Document 121 Filed 05/23/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 45980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL21-91-000]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Institution of Section 206 
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On August 10, 2021, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL21-91-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e, instituting an investigation into whether the existing 
rates for generating units providing Black Start Service based on a 
federal corporate income tax rate that pre-dates the Tax Cuts and Jobs 
Act of 2017, remain just and reasonable. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 
176 FERC ] 61,080 (2021).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL21-91-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL21-91-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in 
accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2020), within 21 days of the date of 
issuance of the order.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system on 
the Commission's home page (http://www.ferc.gov) using the ``eLibrary'' 
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the 
docket number field to access the document.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 11, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17633 Filed 8-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 154 (Friday, August 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44711-44712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9057-8]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed August 2, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through August 9, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210113, Final, USACE, CA, Adoption--Westside Subway Extension 
Transit Corridor Project Extension of the Existing Metro Purple Line 
and Metro Red Line Heavy Rail Subway Los Angeles County Metropolitan 
Transportation Authority Los Angeles County CA, Review Period Ends: 09/
13/2021, Contact: Kathlyn Osagie 213-330-6030.

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has adopted the Federal 
Transit Administration's Final EIS No. 20120072, filed 03/15/2012 with 
the Environmental Protection Agency. The USACE was not a cooperating 
agency on this project. Therefore, republication of the document is 
necessary under

[[Page 44712]]

Section 1506.3(c) of the CEQ regulations.

EIS No. 20210114, Final, NRC, TX, Interim Storage Partners LLC's 
License Application for a Consolidated Interim Storage Facility for 
Spent Nuclear Fuel in Andrews County, Texas, Review Period Ends: 09/13/
2021, Contact: James R. Park 301-415-6954.
EIS No. 20210115, Final Supplement, USACE, CA, Adoption--Westside 
Purple Line Extension Section 4(f) Evaluation, Review Period Ends: 09/
13/2021, Contact: Kathlyn Osagie 213-330-6030.

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has adopted the Federal 
Transit Administration's Final Supplemental EIS No. 20170235, filed 11/
24/2017 with the Environmental Protection Agency. The USACE was not a 
cooperating agency on this project. Therefore, republication of the 
document is necessary under Section 1506.3(c) of the CEQ regulations.

EIS No. 20210116, Draft, USFS, CO, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison 
Forest Plan Revision, Comment Period Ends: 11/12/2021, Contact: 
Samantha Staley 970-852-9812.

Amended Notice

EIS No. 20210092, Draft, USAF, ID, Airspace Optimization for Readiness 
for Mountain Home Air Force Base, Comment Period Ends: 09/22/2021, 
Contact: Robin Divine 210-925-2730.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 07/09/2021; Extending the Comment 
Period from 08/23/2021 to 09/22/2021.

    Dated: August 9, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-17325 Filed 8-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1641

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study alternatives for establishing

a national historic trail to commemorate and interpret the history of

women’s rights in the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself and Mr. D’AMATO) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study alternatives

for establishing a national historic trail to commemorate

and interpret the history of women’s rights in the United

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Rights Na5 tional Historic Trail Act of 1998’’.
2

•S 1641 IS

1 SEC. 2. STUDY OF ALTERNATIVES FOR NATIONAL HISTORIC

2 TRAIL TO COMMEMORATE AND INTERPRET

3 HISTORY OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN THE

4 UNITED STATES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act6 ing through the Director of the National Park Service (re7 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’), shall conduct

8 a study of alternatives for establishing a national historic

9 trail commemorating and interpreting the history of wom10 en’s rights in the United States.

11 (b) MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED.—The study

12 under subsection (a) shall include—

13 (1) consideration of the establishment of a new

14 unit of the National Park System;

15 (2) consideration of the establishment of var16 ious appropriate designations for routes and sites re17 lating to the history of women’s rights in the United

18 States, and alternative means to link those sites, in19 cluding a corridor between Buffalo, New York, and

20 Boston, Massachusetts;

21 (3) recommendations for cooperative arrange22 ments with State and local governments, local his23 torical organizations, and other entities; and

24 (4) cost estimates for the alternatives.

25 (c) STUDY PROCESS.—The Secretary shall—
3

•S 1641 IS

1 (1) conduct the study with public involvement

2 and in consultation with State and local officials,

3 scholarly and other interested organizations, and in4 dividuals;

5 (2) complete the study as expeditiously as prac6 ticable after the date on which funds are made avail7 able for the study; and

8 (3) on completion of the study, submit to the

9 Committee on Resources of the House of Represent10 atives and the Committee on Energy and Natural

11 Resources of the Senate a report on the findings and

12 recommendations of the study.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1471 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1471

 To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from treating 
 any Medicaid-related funds recovered as part of State litigation from 
  one or more tobacco companies as an overpayment under the Medicaid 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 1997

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from treating 
 any Medicaid-related funds recovered as part of State litigation from 
  one or more tobacco companies as an overpayment under the Medicaid 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TREATING ANY MEDICAID-RELATED FUNDS RECOVERED 
              FROM ONE OR MORE TOBACCO COMPANIES AS AN OVERPAYMENT.

    (a) Prohibition on Treatment as Overpayment.--Section 1903(d)(3) of 
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(d)(3)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' before ``The''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(B) Subparagraph (A) and paragraph (2)(B) shall not apply to any 
amount recovered or paid to a State as part of a settlement or judgment 
reached in litigation initiated or pursued by a State against one or 
more manufacturers of tobacco products, as defined in section 5702(d) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to amounts recovered or paid to a State before, on, or after the date 
of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-73550) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan of
Wolverine Tube, Inc.; (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-73490)
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors of Wolverine
Tube, Inc.; (iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-87687) pertaining
to the Savings Plan of Wolverine Tube, Inc.; (iv) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-67958) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan of
Wolverine Tube, Inc.; (v) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-67968)
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors of Wolverine
Tube, Inc.; (vi) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-67972) pertaining
to the 2001 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors of Wolverine Tube, Inc.; and
(vii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-108003) pertaining to the
2003 Equity Incentive Plan of Wolverine Tube, Inc. of our report dated February
26, 2004 with respect to the 2003 consolidated financial statements and schedule
of Wolverine Tube, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2005.

                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

March 8, 2006
Birmingham, Alabama
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

DANIEL CARROLL,

No. 3:14-cv-00711-JE

Plaintiff, 

OPINION AND ORDER

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant.

MOSMAN, J., 

On January 22, 2015, Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued his Findings and 

Recommendation (F&R) [29], recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of 

jurisdiction [3] should be GRANTED. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were 

filed.

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

1 – OPINION AND ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-00711-JE Document 31 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 2
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderks’ recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [29] 

as my own opinion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 10th day of February, 2015. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman_____ 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge

2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-00711-JE Document 31 Filed 02/10/15 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                        CONSENT OF S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated October 11,
1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Tuscarora Incorporated and subsidiaries as of August 31,
1996 and for each of the two years in the period ending August 31, 1996, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in the following
registration statements:

1.   Registration Statements No. 33-35373 and No. 333-06111 on Form S-8 for the
     1985 Incentive Stock Option Plan and 1989 Stock Incentive Plan of Tuscarora
     Incorporated, filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the
     Prospectus used in connection with such Registration Statements; and

2.   Registration Statement No. 33-35587 on Form S-8 for the Tuscarora
     Incorporated Common Stock Purchase Plan for Salaried Employees, filed under
     the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Prospectus used in
     connection with such Registration Statement.


                                        /s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.
                                        --------------------------
                                            S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.
                                            Certified Public Accountants


Beaver Falls, PA
November 26, 1997
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1338

To authorize the expenditure of certain health care funds by the Ponca

Tribe of Nebraska.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 29, 1997

Mr. KERREY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To authorize the expenditure of certain health care funds

by the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SELF-DETERMINATION CONTRACT CARRY4 OVER EXPENDITURE AUTHORIZATION.

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any

6 funds that were provided to the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska

7 for any of the fiscal years 1992 through 1997 pursuant

8 to a self-determination contract with the Secretary of

9 Health and Human Services that the Ponca Tribe of Ne10 braska entered into under section 102 of the Indian Self-
2

•S 1338 IS

1 Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C.

2 450f ) that were retained by the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska

3 to carry out programs and functions of the Indian Health

4 Service may be used by the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska to

5 purchase or build facilities for the health services pro6 grams of the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska.

Æ
Exhibit
      32.1





**Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of RC2 Corporation
      (the "Company") certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  
      August 2, 2006 /s/
      Curtis W.
      Stoelting


Curtis
      W. Stoelting


Chief
      Executive Officer




Dated:  
        August 2, 2006 /s/
        Jody L.
        Taylor
 Jody L. Taylor
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 This
        certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
        to
        the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
        purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       480,184
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             493,510
<PP&E>                                       12,062
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               505,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        66,327
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     18,619
<OTHER-SE>                                   308,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 505,572
<SALES>                                      42,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             62,475
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             351,465
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (293,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (2,190)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (291,321)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                (291,321)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.03)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2



Credicorp Ltd.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements of Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:



| | 1. | I am the Chief Financial Officer of Credicorp Ltd. (the “Company”).
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge:
| | -- | ----------------



(A)        The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(B)        The
information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 30, 2013



|By:  /S/ ALVARO CORREA |                        
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|Name:                  | Alvaro Correa          
|Title:                 | Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Wright, Appellant.

—Two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), both rendered January 4, 1984, affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.