alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Introduction Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Main Menu
                        Home page
                                    About the Plant Introduction Station
                                    Crops
                                    Entomology
                                    Facilities
                                    Pathology
                                    Seed Storage
                                    Seed Viability
                                    Annual Reports
                                    Ash Conservation ProjectSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa Plant Introduction Research People & Locations







Stacey  Estrada
                        Plant Introduction Research

                        




                        
                        Germplasm Program Assistant
                        Phone: (515) 294-3802
                        
                        
                        Fax: (515) 294-1903(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

David Bourke, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) No. 03 CV 7749

-vs- )

) (Judge Zagel)

Village of Downers Grove, Illinois, )

et al., )

)

)

Defendants. )

STIPULATION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the

parties hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice and

without costs as to the following defendants: The Village of Downers Grove,

and present and former Downers Grove Police Officers Dutton, Polnik,

Hutchens, Kucaba, Porter, Tessman, and Nels, Byrne, and Harrison.

/s/ Kenneth N. Flaxman ____________________

KENNETH N. FLAXMAN

ARDC No. 830399

200 S Michigan Ave Ste 1240

Chicago, IL 60604-2430

(312) 427-3200 (phone)

(312) 427-3930 (fax)

knf@kenlaw.com (email)

attorney for plaintiff

/s/ James L. DeAno (with consent)

__________________________

James L. DeAno, Esq.

Deano & Scarry LLC

2100 Manchester Rd., Ste A-101

Wheaton, IL 60187-4579

attorney for defendants above named

Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 84 Filed 10/21/09 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 21st day of October, 2009, I electronically

filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which

will send notification of such filing to the following: James L. DeAno, Esq.,

Deano & Scarry LLC, 2100 Manchester Rd., Ste A-101, Wheaton, IL 60187-

4579, and Thomas P. McGarry, Esq. , Hinshaw & Culbertson, 222 N LaSalle St

Ste 300, Chicago, IL 60601-1013, and I hereby certify that I have mailed by

United States Postal Service the document to the following non CM/ECF

participants: none.

/s/ Kenneth N. Flaxman

______________________

Kenneth N. Flaxman

ARDC Number 08830399

200 S Michigan Ave, Ste 1240

Chicago, IL 60604-2430

(312) 427-3200 (phone)

(312) 427-3930 (fax)

knf@kenlaw.com (email)

Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 84 Filed 10/21/09 Page 2 of 2
#### COMMONWEALTH v. NEW YORK, L. E. & W. R. CO.

APPEALS BY PLAINTIEE AND DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OE COMMON PLEAS OE DAUPHIN COUNTY.

Argued June 6, 1889 —

Decided October 7, 1889.

Commonwealth v. Lehigh V. R. Co., ante, 429, and Commonwealth v. New York etc. R. Co., ante, 468, followed.

Before Sterrett, Clark, Williams, McCollum and Mitchell, JJ.

Nos. 36, 46 May Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 200 September Term 1887, C. P.

On April 13, 1887, upon report made, the auditor general and state treasurer stated and entered a settlement of account for taxes against the New York, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company, of three mills upon the nominal value of scrip, bonds, and certificates of indebtedness, OAvned by residents of Pennsylvania, per § 4, act of June 30, 1885, P. L. 193, for the year ending first Monday of November, 1886. From this settlement the defendant company appealed. The cause was sub*479mitted to tbe decision of the court, without a jury, under the provisions of the act of April 22,1874, P. L. 109. The specifications of objections to the settlement, the decision of the court below, Slmonton, P. J., the exceptions thereto filed by both plaintiff and defendant, the opinion of the court below disposing of the exceptions, and the final judgment, raised essentially the same questions as were raised in Commonwealth v. Lehigh V. R. Co., ante, 429, and Commonwealth v. New York etc. R. Co., ante, 463.

Judgment having been entered in favor of the commonwealth for the tax for ten twelfths of one year, attorney general’s commission and interest, total, $2,546.86, the defendant company took the appeal to No. 36, and the commonwealth took the appeal to No. 46, the assignments of error raising essentially the same questions raised in the cases referred to.

*Mr. M. K.*Olmsted, for the New York etc. R. Co.

*Mr. William S.*Kirhpatriole, Attorney General, and *Mr. John J?.*Sanderson, Deputy Attorney General, for the commonwealth.

commonwealth’s appeal.

Opinion,

Mb. Justice Clabk:

For the reasons given in our opinion filed in the Commonwealth’s Appeal in Commonwealth v. Lehigh Yalley Railroad Co. argued at this term and not yet reported [ante, 429], this case is reversed and judgment is now entered in favor of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania for the sum of three thousand seven hundred and sixty-five dollars, with interest according' to law, and costs.

Tax at the rate of 3 mills, .... $2,643.00

Penalty, 10 per cent,..... 264.30

Attorney General’s commissions, . . 132.15

Interest at 12 per cent, ..... 725.82

$3,765.00

NEW YORK ETC. B. CO.’S APPEAL.

Opinion, Mb. Justice Clabk :

This case is ruled by Commonwealth v. New York etc. R. Co., argued at this term and not yet reported [ante, 463].

Judgment affirmed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sustainable Water Management Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Sustainable Water Management Research People & Locations







Robert  Sullivan
                        Sustainable Water Management Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician
                        Phone: (662) 686-3082
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 27, 2016

No. 04-16-00014-CR

Robert Adrian RENDON,

Appellant

v.

The State of TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR11270

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. The appellee’s brief 

is due on January 13, 2017.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael D. Andereck, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Michael D. AndereckMichael D. AndereckPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJune 14, 2004
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research: Manhattan, KS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Central Small Grain Genotyping Laboratory
                    Units
                        Center for Grain and Animal Health Research: Manhattan, KS
                                    Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit
                                    Grain Quality and Structure Research Unit
                                    Stored Product Insect & Engineering Research UnitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Manhattan, Kansas Center for Grain and Animal Health Research Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research People & Locations







Alexandra  Freige
                        Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid
                        Phone: 5323560
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-2531

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Matt McDermott

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________

 Submitted: December 20, 2013

Filed: December 23, 2013 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Matt McDermott directly appeals the order of the district court1

 modifying the

terms of his probation. Upon careful review, we reject McDermott’s claim that the

1

The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of

Nebraska.
district court was biased against him and conclude that his other arguments on appeal

lack merit. The district court committed no abuse of discretion. Cf. United States v.

Leigh, 276 F.3d 1011, 1012 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (revocation of probation is

reviewed for abuse of discretion and requires only enough evidence, within sound

judicial discretion, to satisfy district judge that conduct of probationer has not met

conditions of probation).2

 

We thus affirm the order of the district court. We also deny McDermott’s

pending motion.

______________________________

2

To the extent McDermott has attempted to assert a claim of ineffective

assistance of counsel, he first did so in his reply brief, and we decline to consider it. 

See Jenkins v. Winter, 540 F.3d 742, 751 (8th Cir. 2008) (“Claims not raised in an

opening brief are deemed waived. . . . This court does not consider issues raised for

the first time on appeal in a reply brief.”).

-2-
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


Information Regarding Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP

           Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time
it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such
registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition
such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among
others, an accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part
of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in
connection with the registration statement.

ILEX Oncology, Inc. (the Company) dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen) as
its independent auditors, effective March 21, 2002. Additional information
regarding the Company's dismissal of Andersen is available in the Company's
Report on Form 8-K, as amended filed as of March 27, 2002. The Company has been
unable to obtain Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by reference
into the Company's registration statements, Nos. 333-25537, 333-38302 and
333-38298 on Form S-8; 333-93219, 333-95353, 333-72396, 333-59954, 333-32000 and
333-87721 on Form S-3, collectively the "Registration Statements" of Andersen's
audit report with respect to the Company's consolidated financial statements as
of December 31, 2001 and for the two years in the period then ended. Under these
circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits the Company to file
this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the
Registration Statements, without a written consent from Andersen. As a result,
with respect to transactions in the Company's securities pursuant to the
Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report on
Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Andersen will
not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue
statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by
Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein.
Accordingly, the Company's stockholders will be unable to assert a claim against
Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
#### In the Matter of Wilfredo Ramos, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 713]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered November 15, 2011) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier II hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously *1418confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present — Smith, J.E, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
II

Calendar No. 275

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1304

For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 22, 1997

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Reported by Mr. HATCH, with amendments

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Belinda McGregor shall be held and consid7 ered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States

8 for permanent residence selected for a diversity immigrant
2

S 1304 RS

1 visa for fiscal year 1998 as of the date of the enactment

2 of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

3 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

4 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Belinda

5 McGregor as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State

6 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number

7 during the current fiscal year the total number of immi8 grant visas available to natives of the country of the alien’s

9 birth under section 203(a)(c) of the Immigration and Na10 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153 (a)(c)).

Calendar No. 275

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1304

A BILL

For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Reported with amendments
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-2256

In Re: LARRY LAMONT BUSH, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:06-cv-01631-AMD) 

Submitted: December 8, 2009 Decided: December 29, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Larry Lamont Bush, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Larry Bush petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging 

that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) motion. He seeks an order from this court 

directing the district court to act. 

 Our review of the district court’s docket sheet 

reveals that the district court issued a final opinion and order 

denying Bush’s motion on September 24, 2007. Accordingly, 

because the district court has decided the case, we deny the 

mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

PETITION DENIED
EX-10.5.B.X







EXHIBIT 10.5(b)(x)




NINTH AMENDMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT BETWEEN

FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY AND

THE SCOTTS COMPANY




     THIS NINTH AMENDMENT, dated as of the fifteenth day of October, 2004, by and between Fidelity
Management Trust Company (the “Trustee”) and The Scotts Company (the “Sponsor”);



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor heretofore entered into a Trust Agreement dated January
1, 1998 with regard to The Scotts Company Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor now desire to amend said Trust Agreement as provided for
in Section 14 thereof;



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the Trustee and the Sponsor hereby
amend the Trust Agreement by:




	 	(1)	 	Amending the “investment options” section of Schedule “A”, to add the
following:






	 	•	 	CRM Small Cap Value Fund — Investor Class





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee and the Sponsor have caused this Ninth Amendment to be
executed by their duly authorized officers effective as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	THE SCOTTS COMPANY	 	 	 	FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST

COMPANY	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Pam Kuryla	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Linda Trent	 	               11/10/2004	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	FMTC Authorized Signatory
	 	Date	 	 
	Name:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:
	 	Director, Benefits	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:
	 	10/8/2004