alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1525 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1525

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide financial assistance for higher education to the dependents 
 of Federal, State, and local public safety officers who are killed or 
 permanently and totally disabled as the result of a traumatic injury 
                     sustained in the line of duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Safety Officers Educational 
Assistance Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION TO DEPENDENTS OF 
              PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS KILLED OR PERMANENTLY AND TOTALLY 
              DISABLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

    Part L of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 
(42 U.S.C. 3796 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in the heading for subpart 2, by striking ``Civilian 
        Federal Law Enforcement'' and inserting ``Public Safety'';
            (2) in section 1211(1), by striking ``civilian Federal law 
        enforcement'' and inserting ``public safety'';
            (3) in section 1212(a)(1)(A), by striking ``Federal law 
        enforcement'' and inserting ``public safety'';
            (4) in section 1216(a), by inserting ``and each dependent 
        of a public safety officer killed in the line of duty on or 
        after October 1, 1997,'' after ``1992,''; and
            (5) in section 1217--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (2); and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (6) as 
                paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.

            Passed the Senate May 15, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1525

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide financial assistance for higher education to the dependents 
 of Federal, State, and local public safety officers who are killed or 
 permanently and totally disabled as the result of a traumatic injury 
                     sustained in the line of duty.
```
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 DEWEY C. COKE, 2 Worker-Appellee, 3 v. No. 35,097 4 STEVE STOCK d/b/a STOCK 5 TRANSPORTATION and MOUNTAIN 6 STATES INSURANCE GROUP, 7 Employer/Insurer-Appellants. 8
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 9 Leonard J. Padilla, District Judge 10 LeeAnn Ortiz 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 for Appellee 13 Law Offices of Robert Bruce Collins 14 Robert Bruce Collins 15 Julie Koschtial 16 Audra Davie 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellant 192 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 SUTIN, Judge. 2 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 3 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 4 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 5 {2} AFFIRMED. 6 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 7

__________________________________ 8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 9 WE CONCUR: 10

_______________________________ 11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 12

_______________________________ 13 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 14
#### In the Matter of Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant. George L. Memmen, as Public *759Administrator of Queens County, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to permanently stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), entered December 1,1983, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs.

We agree with the determination of nisi prius, that notice of the accident was given to the petitioner within a reasonable time *(see, Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co.,*47 NY2d 12) and that Allstate Insurance Company established a valid cancellation of its policy *(see, Nassau Ins. Co. v Murray,*46 NY2d 828). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**  **CERTIFICATION**    Accompanying Form 10-Q Report    of First Industrial, L.P.    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b))      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b), each of    the undersigned hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended    March 31, 2006 of First Industrial, L.P. (the    “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/  Michael    W. Brennan    Michael W. Brennan    Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)    First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.     Dated: May 9, 2006 /s/  Michael    J. Havala    Michael J. Havala    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)    First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.     Dated: May 9, 2006  **A signed original of this written statement required by    Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be    retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information    contained in this written statement shall not be deemed    “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed    incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act    of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall    be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.**
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Commodity Protection and Quality Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research
                                    Water Management Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Commodity Protection and Quality Research People & Locations





- Home Page
- Contact Information
- News Articles
- Publications
- Research Projects
- Chang-Lin Xiao - Research Leader
- Charles Burks
- Dave Obenland
- Joel Siegel
- Spencer Walse

Joel P Siegel
                     

                     Research Entomologist


                     Phone: (559) 596-2735
                     
                     

                     Fax: (559) 596-2737
                     

                     9611 S. RIVERBEND AVE.                            
                     
                     

                     PARLIER                       , CA 93648


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Systems Research Unit: Burlington, VT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Burlington, Vermont Food Systems Research Unit People & Locations







Patrick  Ewing
                        Food Systems Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Research Agronomist
                        Phone: (802) 829-5018
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Amendment to the Assignment Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.16 
 

 
 ADDENDUM – EXPATRIATE AGREEMENT TO UNITED KINGDOM 
 Original Agreement Dated February 16, 2005 
 Amended on March 24, 2005

  

			
	To:	  	Thomas R. Hammond
		
	From:	  	Patricia H. Summers
		
	Re:	  	Temporary Assignment to United Kingdom
		
	Date:	  	April 23, 2008

 This addendum extends your assignment agreement to April 23, 2010. 
  

			
	 /s/ Patricia H. Summers                                 
                        4-23-08
	 	
	Patricia H. Summers                                   
                               Date	 	
	Senior Vice President – Global Human Resources	 	

 I acknowledge receipt, understanding and acceptance of this addendum. 
  

	
	 /s/ Thomas R. Hammond                                  
                4-28-08

	Thomas R. Hammond                                   
                       Date
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: APPEAL OF PROSPECT CROZER

LLC FROM THE DECISION OF THE

BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PA

PETITION OF: CHESTER UPLAND

SCHOOL DISTRICT :

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No s. 465

- 498 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of May, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the

remaining issue. The issue, rephrased for clarity , is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred by finding that a judicial officer has violated Pa. Const., art. V, §17, concluding that such violation resulted in the automatic forfeiture of judicial office, and determining that such violation

constitutes a structur al error which renders the trial court’s orders void

ab initio ?
**EXHIBIT 13**
CERTIFICATION
     In connection with this Annual Report of SAP AG (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the periodended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Dr.Werner Brandt, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, thatto our knowledge:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated March 22, 2005         /s/    HENNING KAGERMANN   Name:  Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann   Title:  Chief Executive Officer       /s/    WERNER BRANDT   Name:  Dr. Werner Brandt   Title:  Chief Financial Officer  
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SAPAG and will be retained by SAP AG and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3534 

_____________________________

SHANIQUA ANDERSON,

Appellant,

v.

BAPTIST HEALTH CARE 

CORPORATION,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

March 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Chad E. Levy of Law Offices of Levy & Levy, P.A., Coral Springs,

for Appellant.

Russell F. Van Sickle of Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for Appellee.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1735. IN THE INTEREST OF K. K. M., A CHILD (MOTHER).

In this direct appeal, the mother ofminor child K. K. M. challenges the juvenile

court’s order terminating her parental rights. To obtain appellate review of an order

terminating parental rights, however, a party must file an application for discretionary

review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (12), (b); In the Interest of B. R. F., 299 Ga. 294, 296

(788 SE2d 416) (2016). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is

jurisdictional.” Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 317 Ga. App. 426, 427 (731

SE2d 110) (2012) (punctuation omitted). Thus, the mother’s failure to file a

discretionary application deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is

hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 08, 2024

08/08/2024
Exhibit 10.114


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE RETENTION AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to Executive
Retention Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of November 15, 2008,
by and between Meade Instruments Corp. (the “Company”) and Steven L. Muellner (“Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have
entered into that certain Executive Retention Agreement, dated as of January 10,
2008 (“Executive Retention Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire
to amend the Executive Retention Agreement as set forth below.


 


For good and valuable consideration, the
parties agree as follows:


 


Section 1.               All defined terms not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meanings set forth in the Executive Retention Agreement.


 


Section 2.               The Termination Date set forth in Section 5 of
the Executive Retention Agreement shall be changed to March 31, 2009 and
the Term of the Executive Retention Agreement shall be extended until such
Termination Date.


 


Section 3.               Unless otherwise specifically set forth herein, all
other terms and conditions of the Executive Retention Agreement shall remain as
originally set forth therein.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Paul E. Ross

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  Senior Vice President – Finance
  and

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Steven L. Muellner
#### Koriba, Inc., Respondent, v Anthony Porco et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Title.)

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to property caused by fire, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.), dated October 24, 1984, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute without prejudice to renewal.

Order reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed.

While courts have great flexibility in determining whether a delay in prosecuting an action is excusable, and while public policy favors the resolution of cases on the merits *(see, Stark v Marine Power & Light Co.,*99 AD2d 753), it is equally true that "defendants are entitled to be free * * * of the burden of defending actions which possess little or no merit, or even of *631defending actions of merit but too long delayed” *(Sortino v Fisher,*20 AD2d 25, 28).

The instant action to recover damages for injury to corporate property caused by fire was commenced over nine years ago. The sole cause for the lack of progress in this matter was the inability of the principals of the plaintiff corporation to agree upon substituted counsel to represent the corporation in place of its original attorneys, who had been granted leave to withdraw.

It was not until two years and eight months after the original attorneys were relieved that the principals of the corporation finally appointed a substituted attorney. In the interim, numerous court orders, which directed the principals to agree upon the selection of an attorney, were ignored. Sixteen months elapsed before plaintiff’s new counsel became aware that a note of issue had been filed by an attorney who was not authorized to act on behalf of the corporation.

Although the record does reflect that counsel may have been genuinely confused about the status of the action in view of its tortured procedural evolution, this situation was precipitated solely by the actions of plaintiff’s principals.

Under these circumstances, the delay was prejudicial and it was an improvident exercise of discretion to require defendants to defend the action after so much time had elapsed.

We further note that the affidavit of merits submitted on behalf of the plaintiff merely restates the allegations of the complaint and is wholly devoid of evidentiary facts to establish the viability of the claim *(see, Central School Dist. No. 1 v Perfetto & Whalen Constr. Corp.,*79 AD2d 755, *affd*53 NY2d 1034). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

s1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

138935

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138935 COA: 288561 Wayne CC: 91-005594-FH DEXTER EARL HOLLINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 23, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50285 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OLGA CHAPA FALCON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-93-CR-100

- - - - - - - - - - August 1, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Olga Chapa Falcon appeals her jury conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and using a telephone to facilitate a felony, complaining of insufficiency of the evidence and an evidentiary ruling. Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities convince us that no reversible error was committed. The evidence was not insufficient. See United States v. Maltos , 985 F.2d 743, 746 (5th Cir. 1992) (drugNo. 95-50285 - 2 - conspiracy); United States v. Gonzales-Rodriguez , 966 F.2d at 918, 921 (5th Cir. 1992) (telephone charge). The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the challenged testimony. United States v. Fortenberry , 919 F.2d 923, 925 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied , 499 U.S. 930 (1991). AFFIRMED.