alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and the
consolidated statements of income for the three-month period ended December 31,
2000 of Vari-Lite International, Inc. as set forth in this Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,947
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (672)
<INVENTORY>                                     14,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,594
<PP&E>                                         116,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,983
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,490
<SALES>                                          2,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,378
<CGS>                                            1,992
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,755
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,403
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1520

To terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10, 1997

Mr. HUTCHINSON (for himself, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. NICKLES, and Mr. DOMENICI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Code Termination

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF

7 1986.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—No tax shall be imposed by the

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986—

10 (1) for any taxable year beginning after Decem11 ber 31, 2001, and
2

•S 1520 IS

1 (2) in the case of any tax not imposed on the

2 basis of a taxable year, on any taxable event or for

3 any period after December 31, 2001.

4 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to

5 taxes imposed by—

6 (1) chapter 2 of such Code (relating to tax on

7 self-employment income),

8 (2) chapter 21 of such Code (relating to Fed9 eral Insurance Contributions Act), and

10 (3) chapter 22 of such Code (relating to Rail11 road Retirement Tax Act).

12 SEC. 3. NEW FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM.

13 (a) STRUCTURE.—The Congress hereby declares that

14 any new Federal tax system should be a simple and fair

15 system that—

16 (1) applies a low rate to all Americans,

17 (2) provides tax relief for working Americans,

18 (3) protects the rights of taxpayers and reduces

19 tax collection abuses,

20 (4) eliminates the bias against savings and

21 investment,

22 (5) promotes economic growth and job creation,

23 and

24 (6) does not penalize marriage or families.
3

•S 1520 IS

1 (b) TIMING OF IMPLEMENTATION.—In order to en2 sure an easy transition and effective implementation, the

3 Congress hereby declares that any new Federal tax system

4 should be approved by Congress in its final form no later

5 than July 15, 2001.

Æ
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The  Board  of  Directors
Emeritus  Corporation:


We  consent  to  incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-60323,  333-05965 and 333-70580) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-20805) on Form S-3
of  Emeritus  Corporation  of  our  report  dated March 8, 2002, relating to the
consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Emeritus  Corporation  and subsidiaries as of
December  31,  2001  and  2000,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  shareholders'  deficit, and cash flows and the related schedule for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report
appears  in  the  December  31,  2001  annual  report  on  Form 10-K of Emeritus
Corporation.


/s/  KPMG  LLP


Seattle,  Washington
March  29,  2002
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TAVARES DAMIEN WEST,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-2162

[July 6, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Lisa M. Porter, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11-010634CF10A.

H. Scott Hecker of the Law Offices of H. Scott Hecker, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Katie B. et al., Appellants, v Miriam H. et al., Respondents. Raphael D., Intervenor-Respondent.

—In a proceeding by foster parents to determine custody of a minor child pursuant to Family Court Act § 651 (b), petitioners and the Law Guardian appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Gallet, J.), dated November 5, 1984, which dismissed the petition.

Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Family Court that petitioners, the foster parents, do not have standing to initiate a custody proceeding. Social Services Law § 383 (3) provides only that, "[f]oster parents having had continuous care of a child, for more than

*546eighteen months * * * shall be permitted * * * to *intervene*in any proceeding involving * * * custody” (emphasis supplied). Under that section, foster parents are also granted the right to apply for adoption *if*the child involved is eligible. The Legislature determines the rights between foster parent and child *(see, Smith v Organization of Foster Families,*431 US 816, 846).

Petitioners’ attempt to label their petition as one to extend placement is inappropriate. Pursuant to Family Court Act § 1055 (b) (i), a petition to extend placement must be brought at least 60 days prior to expiration of placement, except if good cause is shown. Since petitioners did not move for extension until the day foster care placement expired and failed to show good cause for the delay, we cannot treat the petition for custody as one to extend placement. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            16,802
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         153
<MORTGAGE>                                         183
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  21,627
<CASH>                                              59
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 461
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           4,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,581
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  5,987
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 53
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  16,678
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           97,377
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              250<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,581
<PREMIUMS>                                       2,954
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,163
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 (5)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                       2,282
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        417
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    494
<INCOME-TAX>                                       155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       339
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.42
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS COMPANY OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED SECURITIES OF
SUBSIDIARY TRUST HOLDING SOLELY PARENT JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1457 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1457

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
 to certain fine jewelry certain trade benefits of insular possessions 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 1997

 Ms. Moseley-Braun introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
 to certain fine jewelry certain trade benefits of insular possessions 
                         of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the additional 
U.S. notes to chapter 71 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States are amended by adding at the end the following new note:
    ``3.(a) Notwithstanding any other provision in additional U.S. note 
5 to chapter 91, any article of jewelry provided for in heading 7113 
which is the product of the Virgin Islands, Guam, or American Samoa 
(including any such article which contains any foreign component) shall 
be eligible for the benefits provided in paragraph (h) of additional 
U.S. note 5 to chapter 91, subject to the provisions and limitations of 
that note and of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this note.
    ``(b) Nothing provided for in this note shall result in an increase 
or a decrease in the aggregate amount referred to in paragraph (h)(iii) 
of, or quantitative limitation otherwise established pursuant to the 
requirements of, additional U.S. note 5 to chapter 91.
    ``(c) Nothing provided for in this note shall be construed to 
permit a reduction in the amount available to watch producers under 
paragraph (h)(iv) of additional U.S. note 5 to chapter 91.
    ``(d) The Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the Interior 
shall issue such regulations, not inconsistent with the provisions of 
this note and additional U.S. note 5 to chapter 91, as they determine 
necessary to carry out their respective duties under this note. Such 
regulations shall not be inconsistent with substantial transformation 
requirements established by the United States Customs Service but may 
define the circumstances under which articles of jewelry shall be 
deemed to be `units' for purposes of the benefits, provisions, and 
limitations of additional U.S. note 5 to chapter 91.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2033

EKOKO K. AVOKI; FRANCISCO K. AVOKI,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CITY OF CHESTER, SC; POLICE OF CHESTER, SC; DOES I-XXX; PTL 

COVINGTON, Individually,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DOES I-XX, unknown,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (0:17-cv-01141-SAL-PJG)

Submitted: July 19, 2021 Decided: August 3, 2021

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Ekoko K. Avoki, Francisco K. Avoki, Appellants Pro Se. David Allan DeMasters, 

DAVIDSON, WREN & PLYLER, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Francisco K. Avoki and his wife, Ekoko K. Avoki, seek to appeal two orders issued 

by the district court in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action: (1) the March 6, 2020, 

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants partial 

summary judgment and to stay the remainder of the claims pending resolution of Mrs. 

Avoki’s related state criminal proceedings; and (2) the April 17, 2020, order denying the 

Avokis’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the court’s prior ruling. This court 

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders that the Avokis seek to appeal are 

neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.

* Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny the Avokis’ motion to consolidate this 

case with the appeal pending in No. 20-1944, Avoki v. City of Chester, S.C. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

* While we would have jurisdiction to review the district court’s secondary ruling 

in its order rejecting the Rule 59(e) motion—to wit: the denial of the Avokis’ request for 

injunctive relief against an unnamed party, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1)—we do not reach 

that ruling because the Avokis have not raised any argument related thereto in their 

informal briefs, see 4th Cir. Rule 34(b).
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Wolverine Tube, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statement (No. 333-141815) on Form S-1 of Wolverine Tube, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated June 11, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Wolverine Tube, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, whichreport appears in the December 31, 2008, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wolverine Tube, Inc. 

Our report contains an explanatoryparagraph that states that the Company does not currently have additional borrowing capacity and future funding requirements with respect to its liquidity requirements could vary materially from the Company’s current estimates, which raisesubstantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty. 

Birmingham, Alabama 

June 11, 2009 

 

105
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DEBRA A. and GERALD J. BUDNER and §

MARIE ACKERMAN, individually and on §

Behalf of all others similarly situated, §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § No. 03 C 2100

§

WELLNESS INTERNATIONAL §

NETWORK, LTD., a/k/a WIN, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a), Plaintiffs, Debra A. and Gerald J. Budner and Marie

Ackerman file this Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, and hereby request that the Court

dismiss this action with prejudice. On March 15, 2007, District Judge Ed Kinkeade of the

United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissed with prejudice all

claims asserted by Plaintiffs.

1

Plaintiffs no longer desire to pursue this matter, and ask this Court to enter the proposed

order attached to this Joint Motion to Dismiss. Defendants do not oppose the relief sought by

Plaintiffs in this stipulation.

1

Budner v. Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd., et al., civil action no. 3:06-CV-0329 (N.D. Tex. – Dallas), Memorandum

Opinion and Order, March 15, 2007 [Document No. 35].

Case: 1:03-cv-02100 Document #: 26 Filed: 05/29/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:173
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 2

Respectfully submitted,

By: John G. Jacobs

John G. Jacobs

One of the attorneys for Plaintiffs

John G. Jacobs

The Jacobs Law Firm, Chtd.

122 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 1850

Chicago, Illinois 60603

(312) 427-4000

Fax: (312) 427-1850

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned hereby certifies that he has conferred with John F. Martin, counsel for

Defendants, and that Mr. Martin is unopposed to this Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice.

John G. Jacobs

John G. Jacobs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on this 29

th

day of May, 2007, a true and correct copy of the

foregoing document has been forwarded to all counsel of record in accordance with Rule 5 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

John F. Martin

Gruber Hurst Johansen & Hail LLP

Fountain Place

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 4800

Dallas, Texas 75202

John G. Jacobs

John G. Jacobs

Case: 1:03-cv-02100 Document #: 26 Filed: 05/29/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:174
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ABELARDO NEGRETTE-MEDINA, 3:14-CV-00992-AC

Petitioner, ORDER

v. 

 

MARION FEATHER,

 Respondent.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and

Recommendation (#15) on January 26, 2015, in which he recommends

this Court deny as moot Petitioner’s Amended Petition (#6) for A

Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and enter a judgment

of dismissal. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

1 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-00992-AC Document 17 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 2
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its

obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall,

561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). 

Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not

find any error. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and

Recommendation (#15). Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot

Petitioner’s Amended Petition (#6) for A Writ of Habeas Corpus

and DISMISSES this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 3rd day of March, 2015.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

 

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge

2 - ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-00992-AC Document 17 Filed 03/03/15 Page 2 of 2
Document

Exhibit 10.1

Annual Nonemployee Director Compensation Overview




						
	Board Service
	Cash Retainer	$110,000 (Cash)
	Equity Award	$135,000 (Restricted Stock or RSUs*)
	Additional Cash Retainers for Board Leadership
	Nonexecutive Chairman of the Board	$115,000
	Audit Committee Chair	$26,000
	Compensation Committee Chair	$21,000
	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair	$15,000
	Risk Committee Chair	$15,000
	Stock Ownership Guidelines
	Nonemployee Directors	5X Annual Cash Retainer**


* RSUs are deferred until separation from the Board
** A nonemployee Director is expected to reach the stock ownership guideline four years from the date the individual is first elected to the Board.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            17,834
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         188
<MORTGAGE>                                         202
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  21,710
<CASH>                                              50
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               5,498
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,034
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  5,090
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 49
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  21,095
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           77,783
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,034
<PREMIUMS>                                       1,004
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                400
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                         771
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         97
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    129
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 84
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        84
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>