alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID 0648-XB311]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Advisory Panel will hold a public webinar meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 1, 2021, from 2:30 p.m. until 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information will be posted to                         *https://www.mafmc.org/​council-events.*

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331;                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Advisory Panel will meet via webinar to discuss recent performance of the Atlantic chub mackerel fisheries and develop a Fishery Performance Report. This report will be considered by the Scientific and Statistical Committee, the Monitoring Committee, and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council when reviewing 2022 catch and landings limits and management measures for chub mackerel. These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to Shelley Kimbel-Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

*Authority:*16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: August 9, 2021.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2021-17273 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Social Security Administration

          - [Docket No. SSA-2021-0028]

# AGENCY:

Social Security Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of public availability of FY 2019 Service Contract inventories.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, we are publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY 2019 Service Contract inventory. This inventory provides information on FY 2019 service contract actions over $25,000. We organized the information by function to show how we distribute contracted resources throughout the agency. We developed the inventory in accordance with guidance issued on December 19, 2011 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at                         *https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​omb/​procurement/​memo/​service-contract-inventory-guidance.pdf*. You can access the inventory and summary of the inventory on our homepage at the following link:                         *http://www.socialsecurity.gov/​sci*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ronnetta Mason, Office of Budget, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401. Phone (410) 597-1955, email                         *Ronnetta.Mason@ssa.gov*.                    

Michelle King,

Deputy Commissioner, for Budget, Finance, and Management.

[FR Doc. 2021-16940 Filed 8-6-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
03C6472 Albrecht, et al. vs. Metro Pier, et al. Page 1 of 1

Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge

Morton Denlow Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

CASE NUMBER 03 C 6472 DATE 4/18/2005

CASE

TITLE

Albrecht, et al. vs. Metro Pier, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT:

The parties report that they have finalized the settlement documentation, which will be presented to the

presiding magistrate judge for preliminary approval. Accordingly, all proceedings before this magistrate

judge -- which have been limited to mediating settlement discussions -- are terminated.

Docketing to mail notices.

 Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

mm

Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 66 Filed: 04/18/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:402
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v John O. Hughes, Respondent.

—Appeals by the People from (1) an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Sherman, J.), dated March 26, 1984, which, *inter alia,*granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment, and (2) an order of the same court, dated April 9, 1984, which denied the People’s motion for leave to resubmit the charges to another Grand Jury.

Order dated March 26, 1984 affirmed.

Order dated April 9, 1984 reversed, on the law, and the People’s motion for leave to resubmit the charges to another Grand Jury granted.

We agree that there was legally insufficient evidence before the Grand Jury and therefore the indictment was properly dismissed. However, in view of the new matter presented on the People’s motion for leave to resubmit the case to another Grand Jury, that motion should have been granted. Mangano, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John E. Vantassel, Jr., Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 886] —

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), both rendered February 19, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 52/08, and burglary in the second degree (nine counts) under indictment No. 75/08, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]). The testimony of the defendant’s *908accomplice was sufficiently corroborated by testimony identifying the vehicle used during each of the burglaries and by evidence that several of the items stolen during the burglaries were recovered in the defendant’s home *(see*CPL 60.22 [1]; *People v Brown,*62 AD3d 1089, 1090-1091 [2009]; *see also People v Reome,*15 NY3d 188, 191-192 [2010]; *People v Breland,*83 NY2d 286, 292-294 [1994]; *People v Steinberg,*79 NY2d 673, 683 [1992]; *People v Morales,*86 AD3d 147, 162 [2011], *lv granted*17 NY3d 904 [2011]; *People v Delgado,*50 AD3d 915, 917 [2008]; *People v Montefusco,*44 AD3d 879, 880 [2007]).

The defendant’s contention that the County Court erred in failing to provide the jury with a charge on accessorial liability is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Brown,*232 AD2d 750, 752 [1996]; *People v Graham,*122 AD2d 162 [1986]) and, in any event, is without merit.

The sentences imposed were not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P, Hall, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Tropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit: Hilo, HI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Scientist Pages
                        Scott Geib
                                    Sheina Sim
                                    Charles MasonSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Hilo, Hawaii Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center Tropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit People & Locations







Daniel (dani)  Paulo
                        Tropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit

                        




                        
                        POST DOC
                        Phone: (808) 935-4335
                        
                        
                        Fax: (808) 959-5470(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21

                             TUSCARORA INCORPORATED

                              List of Subsidiaries

     The following is a complete list of the subsidiaries of the Company.


         Name of                                                Jurisdiction of
       Subsidiary                                                Incorporation
       ----------                                                -------------
Alpine Packaging, Inc. (1)                                         Colorado
Tuscarora Investment Corporation (1)                               Delaware
Tuscarora International, Inc. (1)                                  Delaware
   Tuscarora, S.A. de C.V. (2)                                     Mexico
   Tuscarora de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (2)                           Mexico
   Tuscarora de Tijuana, S.A. de C.V. (2)                          Mexico
   Servicios Tuscarora, S.A. de C.V. (2)                           Mexico
Tuscarora Limited (1)                                              England
   Tuscarora (Scotland) Limited (3)                                England
   Tuscarora (London) Limited (3)                                  England
      Arrowtip Limited (4)                                         England
      Anglican Expanded Products Limited (4)                       England

------------
(1)   100% owned by Tuscarora Incorporated.
(2)   All but one share is owned by Tuscarora International, Inc. and
      1 share is owned by Tuscarora Incorporated.
(3)   100% owned by Tuscarora Limited.
(4)   100% owned by Tuscarora (London) Limited.
### Qltfurt ofAppeals 

## JTtfll| Itsirtrt of Okxas at Sallas JUDGMENT RAPP COLLINS WORLDWIDE, INC., Appellant

No. 05-96-00627-CV V. ROBERT R. MOHR, Appellee Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 93-8324-K). Opinion delivered by Justice Kinkeade, Justices Whittington and James participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court isAFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee Robert R. Mohr recover: his costs of this 

### appeal from appellantRapp Collins Worldwide, Inc. andfrom GeneralInsurance Company of America as surety on appellant's cost bond; and the full amount of the trial court's 

### judgment and the costs of this appeal, to the extent that theyexceed the liability of General Insurance Company of America as surety on appellant's cost bond, from appellant Rapp Collins Worldwide, Inc. and from General Insurance Company of America as surety on appellant's supersedeas bond. Judgment entered August 31, 1998. 

# £d^ ED KINKEADE JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-15108

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 16, 2011.

Wifredo A. Ferrer, U.S. Attorney, Lois A. Foster-Steers, Anne R. Schultz, Karin Dorothy Wherry, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jan C. Smith, II, Kathleen M. Williams, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, Janice L. Bergmann, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jan Smith, appointed counsel for Keith Jones, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones’s revised sentence is affirmed. Nevertheless, we vacate and remand for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to correct a clerical error by docketing Jones’s notice of appeal, which designated both the amended criminal judgment in the present case and the final order in a parallel civil action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Case No. l:09-cv-20685-PAS), in the aforementioned civil case as well.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.
EX-10.2






EXHIBIT 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

THE PMI GROUP, INC.

ADDITIONAL BENEFIT PLAN

(September 1, 2007 Restatement)




THE PMI GROUP, INC., having adopted The PMI Group, Inc. Additional Benefit Plan (the “Plan”)
effective as of February 18, 1999, and amended and restated the Plan in its entirety effective as
of September 20, 2006, and further amended and restated the Plan in its entirety effective as of
September 1, 2007, hereby amends the restated Plan as follows:



1. Effective as of January 1, 2008, Section 1.16 is amended by adding a new sentence at the
end of the Section to read as follows:



“Notwithstanding any contrary Plan provision, such Trust shall at all times be
located within the jurisdiction of the United States and shall not at any time
subsequently be transferred outside of such United States jurisdiction.”



2. Effective as of September 1, 2007, the second paragraph of Section 1.03(c) is
amended by deleting the reference to “this Section 1.02” and replacing it with “this
Section 1.03” in the first sentence.



2. Effective as of August 17, 2006, Section 4.07 is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:



“4.07 Contributions to Trust Upon a Change in Control Event.




(a) Upon a Change in Control Event and by the fifteenth (15th) business day
following the end of each calendar month of each Plan year thereafter, the Employer shall
irrevocably deposit cash (or its equivalent) to a Trust for the investment of benefits
payable under the Plan to or on account of each Participant. However, any contributions
made to the Trust in respect of each Participant shall remain subject to the claims of the
general creditors of the Employers. Nothing contained in this Section 4.07 shall give any
Participant or beneficiary any interest in or claim against any specific assets of the
Company.




(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Employer transfers funds into the Trust for
purposes of paying benefits to any current or former “Covered Employee” (as defined below)
during a “Restricted Period” (as defined below), the Employer shall subject the Covered
Employee to immediate income tax on funds and any applicable penalties under section 409A of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and any applicable state tax
laws, regardless of whether such funds remain subject to the general creditors of the
Employer.




(1) The Employer’s “Covered Employees” are the top five covered employees under
section 162(m)(3) of the Code or any Employer executive subject to section 16(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




(2) The term “Restricted Period” shall be determined in accordance with section
409A(b)(3)(B) of the Code.”



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The PMI Group, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed
this Amendment No. 1 to the restated Plan as of the date specified below.



THE PMI GROUP, INC.



	 	 	 
	Date: November 20, 2008

	 	By _/s/ Charles Broom     
	
 
	 	 
	
 
	 	Charles Broom

Senior Vice President, Human Resources
| 1. | I      have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of      Wolverine Tube, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                                       |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |                                       |
| Date:      July 30, 2009 |   | /s/      Harold M. Karp                    |   |
|                     |   | Harold      M. Karp                        |   |
|                     |   | Principal      Executive Officer           |   |
|                     |   | President      and Chief Operating Officer |   |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00314-CV 

THE ESTATE OF MARCIA LYNN 

O'MARY WILLIAMS, DECEASED

------------

FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-PR01311-1

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court’s 

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: December 31, 2014