alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Quarterly Report of Waypoint Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James H. Moss,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




/s/ James H. Moss
-----------------
James H. Moss,
Chief Financial Officer


August 14, 2002

                                       35
Cause No. 12-14-00296- CR

DAVID MARK DAVIS II § IN THE TWELFTH Appellant § §

vs. § COURT OF APPEALS §

STATE OF TEXAS § Appellee § TYLER , TEXAS

APPELLANT ’S NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Appellant, David Mark Davis II , files this notice of change of addr ess with the clerk of the

court.

Appellant currently resides at :

11 Glenview Court Lufkin, Texas 75901

Effective June 4, 2015 , Appellant 's temporary physi cal and mailing address will be:

905 N Loop 499

Unit 525 Harlingen, TX 78550

Respectfully submitted,

David Mark Davis II Appellant, Pro Se ACCEPTED
12-14-00296-CR
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS
5/28/2015 1:08:02 PM
CATHY LUSK
CLERKCertificate of Service

I certify that on May 28, 2015 , I sent a copy of Appellant’ s Notice of Change of Address to all parties listed below as indicated.

____________________ David Mark Davis II

VIA Texas Official eFile System:

STATE OF TEXAS (through Counsel):

Ed. Jones at ejones@angelinacounty.net

James Yakovsky at jy akovsky@angelinacounty.net
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial
officer) of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and belief: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
the Report.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/    AUSTIN L. ROBERTS, III                  
|                                               
|Austin L. Roberts, III, Chief Executive Officer



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD C. ABBOTT    
|                            
|Richard C. Abbott, Treasurer



August 14, 2003
#### In the Matter of State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Rosado, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 348]

Order of commitment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Cassandra M. Mullen, J.), entered March 8, 2011, which, upon a finding of mental abnormality made after a jury trial, and a determination made after a dispositional hearing that appellant is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement, committed appellant to a secure treatment facility, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant challenges only the court’s determination that his father’s testimony was not relevant to the first phase of the article 10 proceeding, concerning whether or not he suffered from a mental abnormality. A mental abnormality is defined as *“a*congenital or acquired condition, disease or disorder that affects the emotional, cognitive or volitional capacity of [the offender] in a manner that predisposes him or her to the commission of conduct constituting a sex offense and that results in [the offender] having serious difficulty in controlling such conduct” (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 [i]). Appellant’s father subsequently testified in the dispositional phase of the proceedings concerning the arrangements he had made for appellant’s return to the community.

The court properly exercised its broad discretion in rejecting the proposed evidence in the first phase of the trial on the grounds of materiality and relevance *(see Mayorga v Jocarl & Ron Co.,*41 AD3d 132, 134 [2007], *appeal dismissed*9 NY3d 996 [2007]). Appellant’s father’s testimony did not relate to appellant’s mental condition and was properly reserved for the later phase of the proceedings. Concur — Tom, J.E, Catterson, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1024 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 202
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1024

To make chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code permanent, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 1997

   Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Kohl) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                            October 9, 1997

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code permanent, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Farmer Protection Act of 
1997''.

 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION.

    Section 302 of the Bankruptcy Judges, United States Trustees, and 
Family Farmer Bankruptcy Act of 1986 (28 U.S.C. 581 note) is amended by 
striking subsection (f).

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF RIGHTS OF FAMILY FARMERS AFTER SUCCESSFUL 
              COMPLETION OF A PLAN.

    Section 2008h(b)(2), of title 7, United States Code is amended by 
adding ``or has successfully completed a reorganization plan under 
Chapter 12 of title 11, United States Code (the Bankruptcy Judges, 
United States Trustees, and Family Farmer Bankruptcy Act of 1986, 
Public Law No. 99-554, as amended)'' after ``title''.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 202

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1024

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To make chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code permanent, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 9, 1997

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted), Emile
Loria, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Epimmune Inc. (the "Company"), and
Robert De Vaere, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 1. The Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, to which this
Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Annual Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Annual
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.

Dated:      March 30, 2004

/s/ Emile Loria                           /s/ Robert De Vaere
------------------------------            ------------------------------------
Emile Loria, M.D.                         Robert De Vaere
President and Chief Executive Officer     Vice President, Finance and
                                          Administration and Chief Financial
                                          Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00314

- CV

THE ESTATE OF MARCIA LYNN

O'MARY WILLIAMS, DEC EASED

------------

FROM PROBATE COURT N O. 1 OF TARRANT COUN TY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2013

- PR01311

- 1

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal .” It is the court ’ s

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Costs of the appeal shal l be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 31 , 2014
#### PARKER, Appellant, v. LANCHANTIN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

September 9, 1896.)

Action by Winthrop Parker against William E. Lanchantin and others.

No opinion. Motion granted, with §10 costs.
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 1 of 42 PageID #:1
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 2 of 42 PageID #:2
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 3 of 42 PageID #:3
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 4 of 42 PageID #:4
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 5 of 42 PageID #:5
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 6 of 42 PageID #:6
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 7 of 42 PageID #:7
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 8 of 42 PageID #:8
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 9 of 42 PageID #:9
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 10 of 42 PageID #:10
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 11 of 42 PageID #:11
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 12 of 42 PageID #:12
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 13 of 42 PageID #:13
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 14 of 42 PageID #:14
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 15 of 42 PageID #:15
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 16 of 42 PageID #:16
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 17 of 42 PageID #:17
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 18 of 42 PageID #:18
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 19 of 42 PageID #:19
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 20 of 42 PageID #:20
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 21 of 42 PageID #:21
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 22 of 42 PageID #:22
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 23 of 42 PageID #:23
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 24 of 42 PageID #:24
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 25 of 42 PageID #:25
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 26 of 42 PageID #:26
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 27 of 42 PageID #:27
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 28 of 42 PageID #:28
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 29 of 42 PageID #:29
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 30 of 42 PageID #:30
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 31 of 42 PageID #:31
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 32 of 42 PageID #:32
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 33 of 42 PageID #:33
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 34 of 42 PageID #:34
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 35 of 42 PageID #:35
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 36 of 42 PageID #:36
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 37 of 42 PageID #:37
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 38 of 42 PageID #:38
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 39 of 42 PageID #:39
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 40 of 42 PageID #:40
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 41 of 42 PageID #:41
Case: 1:01-cv-01621 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/01 Page 42 of 42 PageID #:42
EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-21704, No. 33-24096, No. 33-37300, No. 33-65104, and No. 33-56717 of
McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 6, 1997,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                        /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Sacramento, California
March 28, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated  Statement  of  Financial  Condition  at  June  30,  1999  and  the
Consolidated  Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001033643
<NAME>                       OCWEN ASSET INVESTMENT CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
<CURRENCY>                                            USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                             32,373
<SECURITIES>                                      284,488
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    778,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              22,806
<BONDS>                                           525,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 190
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        207,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      778,609
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   55,377
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   54,814
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      479
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 19,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (18,951)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (18,951)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (18,951)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.00)


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Mycology and Nematology Genetic Diversity and Biology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Search Collections
                        U.S. National Fungus Collections
                                    USDA Nematode CollectionSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Mycology and Nematology Genetic Diversity and Biology Laboratory People & Locations







Megan  Romberg

                                                                (PhD)
                        Mycology and Nematology Genetic Diversity and Biology Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Plant Pathologist
                        Phone: (301) 313-9391
                        
                        
                        Fax: (301) 504-5062(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Karen Stroup, Appellant, v Charles Nazzaro et al., Respondents.

[944 NYS2d 713]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.
#### Lurla L. Burke, Respondent, v MTA Bus Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[942 NYS2d 817]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant MTA Bus Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Markey, J.), dated May 10, 2011, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant MTA Bus Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is granted.

“To establish a prima facie case of negligence against a common carrier for injuries sustained by a passenger when the vehicle comes to a halt, the plaintiff must establish that the stop caused a jerk or lurch that was unusual and violent. Proof that the stop was unusual or violent must consist of more than a mere characterization of the stop in those terms by the plaintiff’ *(Urquhart v New York City Tr. Auth.,*85 NY2d 828, 829-830 [1995] [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Black v County of Dutchess,*87 AD3d 1097, 1098 [2011]). The evidence must establish that the force of the stop was “of a different class than the jerks and jolts commonly experienced in city bus travel and, therefore, attributable to the negligence of [the] defendant” *(Urquhart v New York City Tr. Auth.,*85 NY2d at 830; *see Guadalupe v New York City Tr. Auth.,*91 AD3d 716, 717 [2012]). Here, the defendant MTA Bus Company (hereinafter the defendant) submitted the plaintiffs deposition testimony in support of its motion for summary judgment. That testimony was sufficient to establish, prima facie, that the stop was not “unusual or violent” and of a “different class than the jerks and jolts commonly experienced in city bus travel” *(Urquhart v New York City Tr. Auth.,*85 NY2d at 830; *see Guadalupe v New York City Tr. Auth.,*91 AD3d at 717; *Rayford v County of Westchester,*59 AD3d 508, 509 [2009]; *Golub v New York City Tr. Auth.,*40 AD3d 581, 582 [2007]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Guadalupe v New York City Tr. Auth.,*91 AD3d at 717). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it *(id.).*

*814The parties’ remaining contentions have been rendered academic in light of our determination. Dillon, J.E, Balkin, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Kevin F. McLaughlin, as Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

1.  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Kevin F. McLaughlin |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:                   |   | Kevin F. McLaughlin |
| Title:                  |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:                   |   | May 6, 2005 |
|                         |        |  |  |

 

----