alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Floral and Nursery Plants Research: Washington, DC
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Washington, D.C. National Arboretum Floral and Nursery Plants Research People & Locations







Henry  Guo
                        Floral and Nursery Plants Research

                        




                        
                        POST DOC
                        Phone: (301) 504-5985
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EX 10.2


     

     

    OPTION
      AGREEMENT

    


    The
      undersigned do hereby agree this 19th
      day of
      November, 2008 to issue this day an option and do hereby issue an option in
      this
      agreement, exercisable at any time in Sputnik’s sole and absolute discretion,
      with expiring in 5 years, to acquire 35,000,000 shares of Sputnik Enterprises,
      Inc. common stock for the aggregate sum of $1.00.

    


    Sputnik
      Enterprises, Inc.

     

    By:

    
      
        

      

    

    David
      LaDuke, President

     

     

    Sputnik,
      Inc.

     

    By:

    
      
        

      

    

    David
      LaDuke, President
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1433

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 7, 1997

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.30.90 3-amino-2′-(sulfato-ethyl

sulfonyl) ethyl benzamide

(CAS No. 121315–20–6)

(provided for in subheading

2930.90.29) ........................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2000 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section applies to articles entered, or withdrawn from
2

•S 1433 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

2 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EUROTECH,
LTD. BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,362
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,518
<PP&E>                                             139
<DEPRECIATION>                                      25
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,430
<BONDS>                                          3,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,599
<SALES>                                            350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,476)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.17)


</TABLE>
#### McDaniel *et al. v.*Maddox.

June 30, 1915.

Appeal. Before Judge Ellis. Fultou superior court. November 3, 1914.

*John 8. Gleaion,*for plaintiffs.

*A. G. & J. H. McCalla,*for defendant.

Hill, J.

A will was probated in common form, and an administrator with the will annexed was appointed, the testator not having named an executor. By the terms of the will the entire estate was devised to the testator’s widow, to the exclusion of his other heirs at law, consisting of his children. After the estate had been administered and final returns filed and application for discharge made by the administrator, the children of testator filed objections to the discharge of the administrator, which were withdrawn before trial at the June term, 1906, of the court of ordinary, and letters of dismission were granted by the ordinary to the administrator at the same term. On September 14, 1911, the plaintiffs in the court below, who were the objectors to the discharge of the administrator in the court of ordinary in 1906, filed a petition to the court of ordinary against the sole beneficiary under the will, calling on her to produce the will and have it probated in solemn form. The case was appealed by consent from the court of ordinary to the superior court, where a demurrer was filed and a motion made to dismiss the proceeding, which was accordingly done by the trial judge; and to this judgment the plaintiffs excepted. Meld, that this case is controlled by the reasoning in *Thompson*v. *Chapeau,*132 *Ga.*847 (65 S. E. 127) ; and consequently the court did not err in sustaining the motion and dismissing the application to probate the will in solemn form.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. JOSE DE JESUS GAR C IA, a . k.a . Jose De Je sus Ga rc ia Santia go, De fe nda n t-Appe l la

nt. No. 15-50558

D.C . No. 2:15-c r-00339-SJO M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia S. Jam e s Ote ro, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 14, 2017 * * B e fore : GOODW IN, FARR IS, an d FER NANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Jose De Je sus Ga

rc ia a p pe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 37-m onth se nte nc e for be ing a n ille ga l a lie n found in the

Unite d Stat e s following de porta tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . 

# FIL ED FEB 21 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).§ 1326. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ga rc ia ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a

brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e have provide d Ga rc ia the opportunity

to file a pro se supple m e n t a l brie f. No pro sesupple m e n ta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Garc ia wa ive d his right to a ppe a l his c onvic tion, with the e xc e ption of a

n a ppe a l ba se d on a

c la im that his ple a

wa s involunta

ry . He a lso wa ive d the right to a ppe a l his se nte nc e , with thee xc e ption of thec ourt’ s c a l c ulat ion of his c rim ina l history c ate gory . Our indepe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f a s to the volunta rine ss of Ga

rc ia ’ s ple a

or the c rim ina l history c ate gory c a lc ulate d by

the c ourt. W e the re fore a ffirm a s to thoseissue s . W e dism iss the re m a inde r of the a ppe a l in light of the va lid a ppe a l wa ive r. Se e Unite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th C ir. 2009). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 5 - 5 0 5 5 8 2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Microbial and Chemical Food Safety: Wyndmoor, PA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About ERRC
                        Greetings from the Director
                                    Directions/Lodging
                                    History and Accomplishments
                    Our Work
                        Biomass Pyrolysis Research
                                    IPMP 2013
                                    IPMP Dynamic Prediction
                                    IPMP Global Fit
                                    Pathogen Modeling Program (PMP)
                                    Predictive Microbiology Information Portal (PMIP)
                                    PoultryFARMSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania Eastern Regional Research Center Microbial and Chemical Food Safety People & Locations







Angie  Osoria
                        Microbial and Chemical Food Safety

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Laboratory Technician (Microbiology)
                        Phone: (215) 233-6425
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ORLANDO STANFORD,

Appellant

v.

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 10 WAP 2017

Appeal from the decision of the Office of

Disciplinary Counsel dated December 14,

2016 at No. C4

- 16

- 997 dismissing the

complaint.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11 th day of May , 2017, the Notice of Appeal is quashed.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1024 Referred in House (RFH)]







105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1024


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 31, 1997

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To make chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code permanent, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Farmer Protection Act of 
1997''.

 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION.

    Section 302 of the Bankruptcy Judges, United States Trustees, and 
Family Farmer Bankruptcy Act of 1986 (28 U.S.C. 581 note) is amended by 
striking subsection (f).

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF RIGHTS OF FAMILY FARMERS AFTER SUCCESSFUL 
              COMPLETION OF A PLAN.

    Section 2008h(b)(2), of title 7, United States Code is amended by 
adding ``or has successfully completed a reorganization plan under 
Chapter 12 of title 11, United States Code (the Bankruptcy Judges, 
United States Trustees, and Family Farmer Bankruptcy Act of 1986, 
Public Law No. 99-554, as amended)'' after ``title''.

            Passed the Senate October 30, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.`
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40389

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EMERITO ZELAYA-VASQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:03-CR-328-1 

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Emerito Zelaya-Vasquez (Zelaya) appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence for being found present in the United

States following deportation and removal, without having obtained

the consent of the Attorney General or the Secretary of the

Department of Homeland Security. Zelaya argues, pursuant to

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), that the “felony”

and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and

(2) are elements of the offense, not sentence enhancements,

making those provisions unconstitutional. He concedes that this
No. 04-40389

-2-

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523

U.S. 224 (1998), but raises it for possible review by the Supreme

Court. 

“Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.” United

States v. Rivera, 265 F.3d 310, 312 (5th Cir. 2001); see

Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90. We must follow the precedent set

in Almendarez-Torres unless the Supreme Court itself determines

to overrule it. See Rivera, 265 F.3d at 312.

Zelaya also argues that his sentence violates Blakely v.

Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), because it is based on facts 

not admitted or found by a jury. As he concedes, this argument

is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465-66

(5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004)

(No. 04-5263).

AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 7, 2010
/s/ ROBERT E. MEADRobert E. MeadChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6251

THOMAS BRADFORD WATERS, a/k/a Thomas Waters,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN STEWART, Lake City Police Department; MARK STRICKLAND, Lake 

City Police Department; SERGEANT ANTHONY BACKHUSS, Lake City Police 

Department; JODY COOPER, Lake City Police Department,

Defendants - Appellees,

And

A.T.F. AGENT ALAN C. TOWNSEND; JOHN DOE, #1, Florence County E.M.S. 

Worker; JOHN DOE, #2, Florence County E.M.S. Worker,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:15-cv-04143-RBH-TER)

Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 26, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Thomas Bradford Waters, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Arlene Thomas, THOMPSON & 

HENRY, PA, Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Bradford Waters appeals the district court’s orders accepting the 

recommendations of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants summary judgment in 

Waters’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Waters 

v. Stewart, No. 4:15-cv-04143-RBH-TER (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2018; Dec. 20, 2018; Mar. 13, 

2019). We grant Waters’ motion to amend his informal brief, but deny his motion for the 

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sustainable Agricultural Water Systems Research: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Information
                        Final ReportsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Sustainable Agricultural Water Systems Research People & Locations







Maria Alejandra Ponce De Leon Jara

(Alejandra)
                        Sustainable Agricultural Water Systems Research

                        




                        
                        Project Scientist
                        Phone: (530) 754-2865
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov