alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1456

AN ACT

To authorize an interpretive center at Fort Peck Dam,

Montana.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1456 ES

1 SECTION 1. FORT PECK DAM INTERPRETIVE CENTER.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of Fish and Wildlife

3 shall design, construct, furnish, and equip an historical,

4 cultural and paleontological interpretive center and mu5 seum to be located at Fort Peck Dam, Montana.

6 (b) COORDINATION.—In carrying out subsection (a),

7 the Director of Fish and Wildlife shall coordinate with of8 ficials of the Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Land

9 Management, United States Army Corps of Engineers and

10 the Fort Peck Dam Interpretive Center and Museum.

11 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

12 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section a

13 total of $10,000,000. Funds appropriated are available

14 until expended.

Passed the Senate November 7, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1456

AN ACT

To authorize an interpretive center at Fort Peck

Dam, Montana.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7760** 

MILFORD WASHINGTON, a/k/a Tessuma Nuballa , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. MICHAEL R. REED; PATRICK GURNEY; LOUIS CEI; DANIEL MAHON; DAVID ROBINSON; MS. TAYLOR; MS. BEST , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:13

- cv - 00644

- RBS

- TEM )

Submitted : September 9 , 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015

Before SHEDD , WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Milford Washington , Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpu blished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Milford Washington seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order ruling on several discovery and miscellaneous motions , and has filed a motion to remand
. This court may exercise jurisd ic tion only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

– 46 (1949). The order Washington seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny the motion to remand and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contention s are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1441

To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 7, 1997

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new item:

‘‘ 9902.32.18 Phenol, 2-amino-4-

methyl- (CAS No.

95–84–1) (provided

for in subheading

2922.29.10.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2000 ’’.

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

8 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re9 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for
2

•S 1441 IS

1 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

2 enactment of this Act.

Æ
EX-10.17.B






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.17(b)




AMENDMENT TO THE 

AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN,

as amended and restated effective January 26, 2006 (the “Plan”)





     WHEREAS, Section 15 of the Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) authorizes the Board of Directors to amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, it has been recommended the Plan be amended to clarify certain beneficiary
designations and survivorship procedures;



     NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, Section 13(b) of the Plan is revised to read as follows:



     (b) Transferability. Except as the Administrator shall otherwise determine in connection
with determining the terms of Awards to be granted or shall thereafter permit, no Award or any
rights or interests therein of the recipient thereof shall be assignable or transferable by such
recipient except upon death to his or her Designated Beneficiary, and, except as aforesaid, during
the lifetime of the recipient, an Award shall be exercisable only by, or payable only to such
recipient or his or her guardian or legal representative. In no event shall an Award be
transferable for consideration;



     and, it is further,



     RESOLVED, Section 14 of the Plan is amended so that the definition of “Designated Beneficiary”
therein reads as follows:



     “Designated Beneficiary” shall mean the person or persons, if any, last designated as such by
the Participant on a form filed by him or her with the Plan Recordkeeper in accordance with such
procedures as the Plan Recordkeeper shall provide and, if there is no such designation, shall be
the person or persons most recently named as the beneficiary or beneficiaries of life insurance
provided to the Participant by the Company or a Participating Subsidiary, and, if there is no such
life insurance beneficiary, shall be the person or persons designated in the Participant’s will
and, if the will is silent, shall be the estate of the Participant; provided that, notwithstanding
the above, if a Participant dies on or before 31 December 2007 and has not designated a beneficiary
on a form filed with the Plan Recordkeeper, the Designated Beneficiary will be the person or
persons, if any, most recently designated on a beneficiary designation form filed with the Company,
and if no such form exists, shall then be the person or persons determined according to the
sequence described above;



     and, it is further,



 









 





     RESOLVED, that Section 14 shall be amended to add a definition of “Plan Recordkeeper” to read
as follows:



     “Plan Recordkeeper” shall mean Fidelity Stock Plan Services, LLC or such other person as shall
be engaged by the Company to perform recordkeeping services for the Plan and, if none, shall be the
Company.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	APCI BOARD OF DIRECTORS

17 MAY 2007

 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 




-2-
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1517

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 21, 1998

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To extend the Visa Waiver Pilot Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 217(f) of the Immigration and Nationality

4 Act is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 1997.’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘April 30, 1998.’’

Passed the Senate November 10, 1997.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
ROBERTS. SOLA 

Oregon State Bar No. 84454 

rssola@msn.com 

SHIDON B. AFLATOONI 

Oregon State Bar No. 113115 

saflatooni@outlook.com 

Robert S. Sola, P.C. 

8835 S.W. Canyon Lane, Suite 130 

P01iland, Oregon 97225 

Telephone (503) 295-6880 

Facsimile (503) 291-9172 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

PORTLAND DIVISION 

PAMELA L. MILLER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TRANS UNION LLC, a foreign corporation, 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., a foreign corporation, MIDLAND 

FUNDING LLC, a foreign corporation 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:14-cv-00879-AC 

ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANT 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC. 

THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to 

Dismiss Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian"), and pursuant to FRCP 

41(a)(2); 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that plaintiffs claims against 

Experian are dismissed with prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees to either paiiy. 

Page 1 - ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC. 

Case 3:14-cv-00879-AC Document 35 Filed 08/18/15 Page 1 of 2
!3/'."c DONE AND ORDERED on this /( · day of 

( __ _ 

UNIT 

Page 2- ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC. 

Case 3:14-cv-00879-AC Document 35 Filed 08/18/15 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.48





AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(Amendment), effective as of October 21, 2002, is made by and between Deltagen, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), and Michael T. Sember, the undersigned individual (Executive).





RECITAL





The Company and Executive desire to modify the Employment Agreement (Employment Agreement) into which they entered effective April 22, 2002. The Companys signatory to this Amendment represents that he is authorized
by the Board of Directors to enter into this Amendment on behalf of The Company.





AGREEMENT





NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the Company and Executive agree that the Employment Agreement between The
Company and Executive, effective April 22, 2002, shall be and hereby is amended as follows:





Paragraph 1(a) of the
Employment Agreement currently provides that In addition, the Board of Directors will appoint you to the Board within six months of your commencement of employment. The Company and Executive agree that this provision shall be amended to
read as follows: In addition, the Board of Directors will appoint you to the Board effective December 31, 2002.





The Company and Executive further agree that this Amendment shall not change, modify or amend any other provision of the Employment Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the dates set forth below.





DELTAGEN, INC.



EXECUTIVE:By:

/s/    WILLIAM MATTHEWS



By:

/s/    MICHAEL T. SEMBERName:

William Matthews



Name:

Michael T. SemberTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



Title:

President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:

October 21, 2002



Date:

October 21, 2002
#### Benigno Lacap VIRAY, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74970.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*997Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 25, 2011.

Stephen John Coghlan, Esquire, Law Office of Stephen Coghlan, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Robbin Kinmonth Blaya, Esquire, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Charles Canter, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Benigno Lacap Viray, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Cerezo v. Mukasey,*512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency properly concluded that Vi-ray was an alien seeking admission where he had not been “lawfully admitted for permanent residence.” *See*8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(C); *Segura v. Holder,*605 F.3d 1063, 1067 (9th Cir.2010) (an alien erroneously admitted for permanent residence has not been “lawfully admitted for permanent residence”); *see also Kyong Ho Shin v. Holder,*607 F.3d 1213, 1217-18 (9th Cir.2010) (“[T]he issue of whether [a lawful permanent resident] retains her status until the conclusion of removal proceedings is distinct from whether she was ‘lawfully admitted’ in the first place.... ”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      13,114,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              352,254,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                35,942,000
<INVENTORY>                                116,937,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           154,777,000
<PP&E>                                      66,320,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,724,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             522,685,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,598,000
<BONDS>                                     75,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       133,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 162,952,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               522,685,000
<SALES>                                     55,183,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            64,906,000
<CGS>                                        9,442,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,991,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             5,388,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,478,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,049,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,174,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,875,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,875,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10(c)

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made this 18th day of
October, 1996, by and between Kiddie Academy International, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and George Miller ("Employee").

                              Explanatory Statement

         A. The Company and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated
as of October 1, 1995 (the Employment Agreement") pursuant to which the Company
engaged Employee to perform certain services for the Company, all as more
specifically set forth therein.

         B. The Company and Employee desire to modify and amend certain matters
respecting Employee's terms of employment, as more specifically set forth below.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Explanatory Statement, the
covenants of the parties herein and in the Employment Agreement and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
Company and Employee hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby
amended to include the following new provisions:

         I. Extension of Term. Company and Employee wish to extend the term of
the Employment Agreement so that it shall terminate simultaneously with the term
of the Employment Agreement to be entered into, simultaneously with its
execution of this Amendment, between the Company and Angelo D. Bizzarro as Chief
Executive Officer (the "Bizzarro Agreement"). Accordingly, the Employment Period
under the Employment Agreement is hereby extended so that it shall end on the
last day of the Initial Term (as defined in the Bizzarro Agreement) or, if the
Bizzarro Agreement is renewed, the last day of the last Renewal Term (as defined
in the Bizzarro Agreement).

         II.  Defined Terms. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have
the meaning ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.

         III. Employment Agreement Remains in Effect.  From and after the date
hereof, the Employment Agreement shall be amended as set forth in this
Amendment, and all other provisions, terms and conditions of the Employment
Agreement shall in all respects remain as set forth in the Employment Agreement,
in full force and effect.


<PAGE>




         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee have respectively signed
and sealed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the day and year first
above written.

WITNESS/ ATTEST:                      KIDDIE ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL, INC.


/s/ Cynthia L. Spell                  By: /s/ Michael J. Miller   (SEAL)
--------------------                      ------------------------
                                          Name:  Michael J. Miller
                                                 ---------------------
                                          Title: President
                                                 ---------------------

WITNESS:


/s/ Cynthia L. Spell                  By: /s/ George Miller        (SEAL)
--------------------                      -------------------------
                                          George Miller


                                       2
# Official Journal L 224/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 224 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 615 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 224

English edition

Legislation

Volume 615 September 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1213 of 28 August 2018 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Rucavas baltais sviests’ (PGI)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1214 of 29 August 2018 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Morcilla de Burgos’ (PGI)) | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2018/1215 of 16 July 2018 on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States | 4 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1216 of 4 September 2018 concerning certain interim protective measures relating to African swine fever in Bulgaria
  (notified under document C(2018) 5885)

   (
  1
  ) | 10 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1213 of 28 August 2018 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Rucavas baltais sviests’ (PGI))

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1214 of 29 August 2018 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Morcilla de Burgos’ (PGI))

3

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2018/1215 of 16 July 2018 on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States

4

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1216 of 4 September 2018 concerning certain interim protective measures relating to African swine fever in Bulgaria
  (notified under document C(2018) 5885)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2018) 5885)

1

10

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Cistera Networks,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period  ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Derek P.  Downs,
President and CEO of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Derek P. Downs
Derek P. Downs
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

August 2, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.11


                                          Pfizer
                                          Groton Laboratories
                                          Pfizer Inc.
                                          Eastern Point Road 8118/01
                                          Groton, CT 06340

                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Global Research & Development


                                          Berkeley W. Cue, Jr. Ph.D.
                                          Vice President
                                          Pharmaceutical Sciences
November 4, 2002

Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
65 Lafayette Road
Third Floor
North Hampton, NH 03862-2403

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pfizer Inc and Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. hereby amend paragraph 3 of the
Agreement between them with the Effective Date of October 29, 2001 ("2001
Agreement") relating to the feasibility of developing formulations for Pfizer
Inc compounds to read:

     TERM:  The term of this  Agreement  will  begin on the  Effective  Date and
     continue to eighteen months after the Effective Date.

Except as modified hereby, all other terms and conditions of the 2001 Agreement
remain in full force and effect.

Please indicate your acceptance of the amendment by executing this letter in the
place indicated below.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        /s/ Berkeley W. Cue, Jr.
                                        Berkeley W. Cue, Jr., Ph.D.

Agreed and accepted:

BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


By:    /s/ James R. Murphy
       ----------------------------

Name:  James R. Murphy
       ----------------------------

Title:  President & CEO
       ----------------------------

Date:   Nov. 13, 2002
       ----------------------------