alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          32,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  255,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 356,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        230,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,087
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   356,132
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,995
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,762
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,405
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 State or Other Jurisdiction ofName of Subsidiary
    
    Incorporation or OrganizationLaboratorios Belmac S.A.
    
    SpainLaboratorios Davur S.L.
    
    SpainLaboratorios Rimafar S.L.
    
    SpainBentley A.P.I. S.L.
    
    SpainBentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
    
    IrelandPharma de Espana, Inc.
    
    State of DelawareBentley Park, LLC
    
    State of DelawareBentley Healthcare Corporation
    
    State of FloridaBelmac Health Corporation
    
    State of FloridaBelmac Hygiene, Inc.
    
    State of FloridaBelmac Holdings, Inc.
    
    State of FloridaBelmac A.I., Inc.
    
    State of FloridaB.O.G. International Finance, Inc.
    
    State of FloridaBelmac Jamaica, Ltd.
    
    Jamaica
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 3.1.1
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          UNISON HEALTHCARE CORPORATION


         The undersigned hereby certifies that the Certificate of Incorporation
of Unison HealthCare Corporation is hereby amended as follows:


         FIRST: Section 4 is deleted and a new Section 4 is inserted as follows:

                  4. Authorized Capital. The Corporation shall have the
authority to issue 25,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 par value
per share (the "Common Stock"), and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001
par value per share (the "Preferred Stock").

         SECOND: All of the other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation
shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

         THIRD: The amendment was duly adopted in accordance with Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of Delaware.


Dated:  November 8, 1996.

                                    UNISON HEALTHCARE CORPORATION


                                    By: /s/ Phillip R. Rollins
                                        -----------------------------------
                                            Phillip R. Rollins, Secretary
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

RAUL ARCILA

Defendant.

Case No. 3:14 CR 00267 (BR)

MOTION TO WITHDRAW SECTION 

2255 MOTION 

Raul Arcila, through his counsel Michael R. Levine, moves to withdraw 

his previously filed pro se 2255 motion. This motion is based on the files and 

records of this case and the attached declaration of counsel.

/s/ Michael R. Levine

Case 3:14-cr-00267-JO Document 318 Filed 12/21/20 Page 1 of 2
2

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL R. LEVINE

I, Michael R. Levine, declare as follows:

1. I represent Mr. Raul Arcila who filed a pro se motion to vacate his 

conviction in this case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2255.

2. I have conveyed to Mr. Arcila a declaration by his previous attorney, Mr. 

Sepp. I have also conveyed to him a pathologist’s report from an expert 

retained by me. 

3. Mr. Arcila has advised me (via Corrlinks) that he concurs in this motion to 

withdraw his Section 2255 motion. 

I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING 

IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND 

BELIEF.

/s/Michael R. Levine

 Michael R. Levine

Case 3:14-cr-00267-JO Document 318 Filed 12/21/20 Page 2 of 2
#### *In re*J.W.M., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, *v.*J.W.M., Respondent-Appellant).

Fourth District

No. 4 — 83—0801

Opinion filed May 9, 1984.

Daniel D. Yuhas and Janet Sinder, both of State Appellate Defender’s Officer, of Springfield, for appellant.

*1037Thomas J. Difanis, State’s Attorney, of Urbana (Robert J. Eider man and Perry Lee Miller, both of State’s Attorneys Appellate Service Commission, of counsel), for the People.

PRESIDING JUSTICE MILLS

delivered the opinion of the court:

The minor was committed as a delinquent.

His mother and father (with their addresses) were named in the petition.

Thé record does not reveal that notice was given to either parent of the hearings — adjudicatory and/or dispositional.

Only the mother was present at each.

The Juvenile Court Act provides that every parent, legal guardian, and custodian — or when necessary, the nearest relative — must be named as a respondent, and each is to be individually served unless that is not feasible, in which case service may be by publication. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 37, pars. 704-1, 704-3, 704-4.

The dispositional report here reflects that the minor visits his father often and receives spending money from him, and the minor says he has a good relationship with his father.

These facts distinguish this case from the exceptions to the notice requirements carved out by *In re J.W.*(1981), 87 Ill. 2d 56, 429 N.E.2d 501, *In re L.E.J.*(1983), 115 Ill. App. 3d 993, 451 N.E.2d 289, *In re R.S.*(1983), 117 Ill. App. 3d 698, 453 N.E.2d 139, and *In re J.P.J.*(1984), 122 Ill. App. 3d 573.

Notice to *all*required by the Act is *mandatory.*

The State confesses error.

Reversed and remanded.

TRAPP and WEBBER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of Noble International, Ltd. (the
Company), hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |        |  |                                                                                   
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 27, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Thomas L. Saeli                                                               
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Thomas L. Saeli                                                                   
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Noble International, Ltd.
|                       |  |       
|Date: October 27, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ David J. Fallon                                                               
|                       |  | Name:  |  | David J. Fallon                                                                   
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of Noble International, Ltd.
Exhibit 31(a)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Yury Greene, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Globus
International Resources Corp. for the nine months ended June 30, 2004;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information;and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 2, 2004

/s/ YURY GREENE
-----------------------------

                                 Page 17 of 19
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 17, 2019.

________________

No. 3D19-354

Lower Tribunal Nos. 17-57 and 17-324

________________

Miami Dade County MRI Corp., etc.,

Petitioner,

vs.

United Automobile Insurance Company,

Respondent.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Appellate

Division, Pedro Echarte Jr., Martin Zilber, and Mavel Ruiz, Judges.

Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., and Chad A. Barr (Altamonte Springs),

for petitioner.

Michael J. Neimand, for respondent.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ.

CONFESSION OF ERROR

HENDON, J.
Miami Dade County MRI Corporation petitions this Court for a writ of

certiorari, seeking to quash the following order entered by the circuit court, sitting

in its appellate capacity: (1) an order granting United Automobile Insurance

Company’s motion for attorney’s fees, and (2) an order denying Miami Dade

County MRI Corporation’s motion for attorney’s fees under sections 627.428(1)

and 627.736(8) of the Florida Statutes. Based on United Automobile Insurance

Company’s proper confession of error, we grant the petition, quash the orders

under review, and remand for the entry of an order granting Miami Dade County

MRI Corporation’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees filed under sections

627.428(1) and 627.736(8). 

Petition granted; orders quashed; and remanded with directions.

2
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 1 of 30 PageID #:1
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 2 of 30 PageID #:2
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 3 of 30 PageID #:3
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 4 of 30 PageID #:4
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 5 of 30 PageID #:5
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 6 of 30 PageID #:6
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 7 of 30 PageID #:7
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 8 of 30 PageID #:8
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 9 of 30 PageID #:9
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 10 of 30 PageID #:10
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 11 of 30 PageID #:11
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 12 of 30 PageID #:12
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 13 of 30 PageID #:13
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 14 of 30 PageID #:14
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 15 of 30 PageID #:15
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 16 of 30 PageID #:16
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 17 of 30 PageID #:17
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 18 of 30 PageID #:18
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 19 of 30 PageID #:19
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 20 of 30 PageID #:20
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 21 of 30 PageID #:21
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 22 of 30 PageID #:22
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 23 of 30 PageID #:23
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 24 of 30 PageID #:24
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 25 of 30 PageID #:25
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 26 of 30 PageID #:26
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 27 of 30 PageID #:27
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 28 of 30 PageID #:28
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 29 of 30 PageID #:29
Case: 1:04-cv-03238 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 30 of 30 PageID #:30
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1547 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1547

   To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on Butanamide, N,N'-
 (3,3'dimethyl[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[2-[2,4-dichlorophenyl)azo]-
                                3-oxo-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 1997

  Mr. Chafee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on Butanamide, N,N'-
 (3,3'dimethyl[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[2-[2,4-dichlorophenyl)azo]-
                                3-oxo-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BUTANAMIDE, N,N'-(3,3'DIMETHYL[1,1'-
              BIPHENYL]-4,4'-DIYL)BIS[2-[2,4-DICHLOROPHENYL)AZO]-3-
              OXO-.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new subheading:

      

``    9902.32.XX        Butanamide, N,N-                                                                        
                         (3,3dimethyl[1,                                                                        
                         1-biphenyl]-4,4-                                                                       
                         diyl)bis[2-[2,4-                                                                       
                         dichlorophenyl)                                                                        
                         azo]-3-oxo-                                                                            
                         provided for in                                                                        
                         subheading                                                                             
                         3204.17.04.....  Free             No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                                                                                              31/2002           
                                                                                                              ''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Fredric E. Weinberg, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

February 10, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Howard Benjamin*of counsel *(Michael A. Gentile,*attorney), for petitioner.

*Fredric E. Weinberg,*respondent *pro se.*

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Fredric E. Weinberg was admitted to practice as *47an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, on March 16, 1966. At all times relevant herein, he maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Beginning in January of 1977 until August 14, 1985, when respondent submitted his resignation, he was associated with a prominent law firm and became a partner in February of 1978. There is currently an investigation pending against respondent by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee involving allegations of professional misconduct. According to respondent, he cannot successfully defend himself on the merits against the charges which have been brought against him and is, therefore, freely and voluntarily tendering his resignation from the Bar.

The basis for the Disciplinary Committee’s investigation is respondent’s practice of attributing personal American Express charges to client expenses. Specifically, he admits to incurring charges arising out of his own personal use rather than from any client related purposes, yet remitting bills to clients which made his personal charges appear as if they were bona fide client expenses. The total amount of money which respondent stole in this manner amounted to some $77,000. On the same date that he resigned from his firm, respondent executed a document assigning his capital account, income account and interests in the accounts receivable to be applied as restitution to the victims of the improper billing.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee states that it has reviewed respondent’s affidavit of resignation and has duly submitted it to the consideration of a Hearing Panel, which recommends to this court that the resignation be accepted. Upon review of the record herein, we find that respondent’s resignation should be accepted. Consequently, his name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Mironas, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s resignation is accepted, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective February 10,1987.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 16, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Daniel Knutson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  By  /s/ Daniel Knutson
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Daniel Knutson
                                  Senior Vice President
                                  and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-80065, 333-06563, 333-114151, 333-35651, 333-28929 and
333-28927) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-16767 and
333-26293), respectively, of our report dated January 26, 1998, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Secure Computing
Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1997.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 24, 1998
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D18-3950 

_____________________________ 

MICHAEL JOHN BISKIE, 

Appellant, 

v. 

SANDRA LEE ABBOTT, f/k/a

Sandra Lee Biskie, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County. 

David P. Kreider, Judge. 

July 9, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

WOLF, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

Beth M. Gordon, The Gordon Law Firm, Williston, for Appellant. 

Thomas H. Yardley, Cocoa, for Appellee.