alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<logo>Matrix Financial Services Corp
Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Tracey Waldman

RE:	Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The Undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1996 fiscal year:

A)	I have reviewed the activities and performance of the 
Servicer during the preceding fiscal year under the terms 
of the Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and 
Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and to 
the best of these Officers' knowledge, the Servicer has 
fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities or 
Obligations under these Agreements throughout such year, 
or if there has been a default or failure and the nature 
and status thereof lies been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA.;

B)	I have confirmed that the Servicer is currently an 
approved FNMA or FHLMC Servicer in good standing;

C)	I have confirmed the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and 
Omissions Insurance Policy and any other bonds required 
under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Pooling and 
Servicing Agreement end/or Seller/Servicer Guide are in 
full force and effect;

D)	All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood 
Insurance policy (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage 
Insurance Policy (if applicable), with respect to each 
Mortgaged Property, have been paid and that all such 
insurance policies are in full force and effect;

E)	All real estate taxes governmental assessments and 
any other expenses accrued and due, that if not paid could 
result in a lien or encumbrance on any Mortgaged Property, 
have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses have not 
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the 
reason for the non-payment has been reported to Norwest 
Bank Minnesota, NA.;

F)	All Custodial Accounts, have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

C)	All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of 
Mortgage property required per section 6050J and 6050P of 
the Internal Revenue Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:
/s/Carol Konab
Officer
Title
5/21/97
Date

201 W. Coolidge St,. Phoenix. AZ 85013-2710
(602)650-0838 ( fax(602)631-4377
Christine N. Moore, OSB No. 060270

cmoore@.lbblawvers.com

Landye Bennett Blumstein LLP

1300 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 3500

Portland, OR 97201

Telephone: (503) 224-4100

Facsimile: (503) 224-4133

Vincent Norwillo

Vincent Norwiilo@gshllp.com

Gonzalez Saggio & Harlan LLP

526 Superior Avenue, Suite 620

Cleveland, OH 44114

Attorneys for Defendant Diversified Labor

Support LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

FRANK SICA, an individual,

Plaintiff,

V.

DIVERSIFIED LABOR SUPPORT LLC, a

foreign limited liability company.

Defendant.

No.

NOTICE OF REMOVAL

By Defendant DIVERSIFIED LABOR

SUPPORT LLC, a foreign limited liability

company

Multnomah County Circuit Court

Case No. 1402-02418

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant Diversified Labor Support LLC removes this

action to the United States District Court for the District of Oregon from the Circuit Court ofthe

State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah, pursuant to 28 USC §§ 1441, 1446. The removal

is based on the following grounds:

STATE COURT ACTION

1. On or about February 25, 2014, plaintiff Frank Sica filed an action in Multnomah

Pagel- NOTICE OF REMOVAL 791817.DOCJ5328-00I

LANDYE BENNETT BLUMSTEIN LLP

Attorneys at Law

1300 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3500

Portland, Oregon 97201 503.224-4100 0503.224-4133 (facsimile)

Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 2 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 3 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 4 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 5 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 6 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 7 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 8 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 9 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 10 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 11 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 12 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 13 of 14
Case 3:14-cv-00776-HU Document 1 Filed 05/09/14 Page 14 of 14
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:2
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:3
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:4
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:5
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:6
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:7
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:8
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:9
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:10
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:11
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:12
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:13
Case: 1:03-cv-07283 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/15/03 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:14
Exhibit 4.2


 


JT 13351/2


 


COPYRIGHT 1930 BY


DWIGHT & M.H. JACKSON


CHICAGO


PATENT PENDING


 


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF


 


DELAWARE


 


	
  NUMBER

  	
   

  	
  SHARES

  
	
  xxx

  	
   

  	
  xxx

  



 


SEE RESTRICTIVE LEGENDS ON REVERSE SIDE.


 


HF FINANCIAL CORP.


FIXED RATE CUMULATIVE PERPETUAL PREFERRED
STOCK, SERIES A


 


This Certifies that SPECIMEN
is the owner of  XXX
full paid and non-assessable PREFERRED Shares $0.01 par value, of  FIXED RATE CUMULATIVE PERPETUAL PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES A transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof
in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon the surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed.


 


A statement
in full, of all the designations, preferences, qualifications, limitations,
restrictions and special or relative rights of the shares of each class
authorized to be issued, will be furnished by the Corporation to any
shareholder upon written request and without charge.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has
caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be
sealed with the Seal of the Corporation, this XX day of XX A.D. XX.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  SECRETARY      

  	
   

  	
  PRESIDENT      

  



 


	
  © DWIGHT & M. H. JACKSON

  	
  CORPORATION
  SUPPLY CO.

  
	
  205 W. RANDOLPH STREET

  	
  CHICAGO. ILLINOIS
  60606

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  DIV. OF
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kareem McCutheon, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 570]

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered May 28, 2008, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of three years, held in abeyance, and the matter remitted for a de novo suppression hearing before another Justice.

The hearing court denied suppression after crediting police testimony about the circumstances leading to the recovery of pistol in the course of the stop of a livery cab in which defendant was a passenger. However, the People failed to disclose grand jury testimony by the cab driver that materially contradicted the police account of the incident. A defendant is entitled to disclosure of favorable “evidence of a material nature which if disclosed could affect the ultimate decision on a suppression motion” *(People v Geaslen,*54 NY2d 510, 516 [1981]).

As the People concede, defendant is entitled to a reopened suppression hearing (see *People v Feerick,*93 NY2d 433, 451-452 [1999]). We reject defendant’s argument that, on this appeal, this Court should accept the driver’s account of the incident *581and grant suppression. Instead, the suppression court should make the necessary credibility determinations “with its peculiar advantages of having seen and heard the witnesses” *(People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]).

Contrary to defendant’s argument, the principle set forth in *People v Havelka*(45 NY2d 636 [1978]) does not preclude a reopened hearing. “[T]here is no claim here that the People’s proof at the suppression hearing was insufficient; the claim was that there was an error at the hearing — that, because of the nondisclosure of *Brady*material, defendant did not have a fair chance to refute the People’s case” *(People v Williams,*7 NY3d 15, 21 [2006]). Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Acosta, Freedman and Román, JJ.
~~J\IQ-.;,~~~ ~oo 

1 /\V~(o. Na...t.~ 

~-!> N ?l':3. '""'\'"'r "'13t(i }('~{"Bl'\ 

~~<:,o 

-~'1S Jo 1,l - o1Lb

~ -v- o w 't! o ,<. W '·>r~~ ~ ~ '11 S.J.--:3 

0-(l WW(\:::> ..LN'3 o.:;~"'.\u'<l-'O~ : w~ I ✓ ~Yl ~r1? ~¥, :l..:\t1£<a 

w 11:3~ 3..1.-¥--u.1..c;,, ..c. ~ci." w ...,-svt'f?, ?\J .3t'-l~-tts 

No-9~~() 

n \\J '\ 0~.-L ~J.~ 3..L c; ,~""21:!c.l---sj a. 'a.l.J;~ ~ .J..? .t.7 ~o - o ~-s~ o t\J t'l7 "J 0 ~-S3 :;t 

N f\Q ~6d..1⁄4;:1 'ci I 'a 'Z"Oo t 

)(""3 ~ '11! I\ ' l!:>V ..L.1⁄4 ':J. ~ ~ a,~ n ~ c;,il? c, ,1- ¥- '1 J. +t<; <'.Z l"'I \'\¥7 S _;r ~ 11t. N 0 

:-a~ :1r:-v-:, wou ~~ _ht:~ N=> .. h, 1 .., _ ::>\JJ - c-.1n .1..1 o--s c.,~.l-¥.t.~ ~-::,1ct3'-wi'-f-dc 

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 117 Filed 11/10/21 Page 1 of 2
Re: Case Number 6:14-cv-1424-MC-United States of America ex rel v. Agate 

Resources et al [Show Cause Hearing] 

I, Roy Mark Bai lets, deputy clerk of the civilian Court of record for the Oregon Statewide Jura I Assembly. 

General Delivery, Beaverton, Oregon, [97005] . 

I rise as amicus curiae, a friend of the court, and an interested third party. I make my Claim of 

Conusance as deputy clerk for the Oregon Statewide Jura I Assembly, a civilian court of record . 

Statement: 

I provide notice that this United States Federal District Court of Oregon in Eugene, located Wayne L 

Morse Federal Building, 405 East Eighth Avenue, Eugene, Oregon, (97401], does not have Territorial 

Jurisdiction. Show and enter into the record that the Oregon Legislature has voted and approved this 

federal building site for the United States government to build "needfu l buildings". 

Demand : 

Provide lawful evidence of this Court's Territorial Jurisdiction in written form into the record of this 

docket number. 

Provide evidence this is a Constitutional Article Ill Court. 

This communique is not intended to mislead, defraud, deceive, nor threaten in any way and is submitted in good 

faith and with clean hands. I do lawful, not legal. I do de jure not de facto color of law. This is my best effort. 

JURAT 

Living Testimony in the form of an Affidavit 

I am, I am known as one of the people. The flesh, blood and soul, body/mind/spirit, on Oregon, an 

Oregonian, a non-U.S. Citizen as witness the living man known as Roy Mark Bailets and he affirmed the 

foregoing Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit before me and for the purposes he has described; 

in Witness whereof I set my hand and thumb print to seal this SN\ day of Nov1§:;'.11.0C£ 2021. 

Case 6:14-cv-01424-MC Document 117 Filed 11/10/21 Page 2 of 2
#### Rowell *v.*The State.

*Defamation.*

(Decided April 7, 1910.

52 South. 310.)

*Appeal anti, Error; Time for Talcing.*— The time within which an appeal may be taken from a conviction is limited by statute to twelve months, and unless taken within that time, is unauthorized and cannot be considered.

Appeal from. Coffee County Court.

Heard before Hon. J. N. Ham.

Belle Rowell was convicted of defamation and she appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

H. L. Martin, for appellant.

Counsel discuss the merits of the case as presented by the charges asked and refused, and exceptions to evidence and cites authorities in support thereof, but does not discuss the time within which the appeal was taken.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

Counsel insists that the appeal was taken more than twelve months after the judgment of conviction, and hence cannot be entertained.

DOWDELL, C. J.

It appears from the record that the present appeal ivas not taken until after the expiration of a year from the rendition of the judgment. The time within which an appeal can be taken in such a case is limited by the statute to one year. The appeal is therefore unauthorized, and this court is without jurisdiction to entertain *it.*—Dennis *et al v.*Currie, 142 Ala. 637, 38 South. 802; *Blackburn v. Huber Mfg. Co.,*135 Ala. 598, 33 South. 160. It follows that the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Anderson, Mayfield, and Sayre, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock Bio-Systems: Clay Center, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USMARC Home
                    USMARC Research Units
                        Genetics and Animal Breeding
                                    Meat Safety & Meat Quality
                                    Nutrition, Growth and Physiology
                                    Animal Health GenomicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Clay Center, Nebraska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Livestock Bio-Systems People & Locations







Hiruni  Wijesena
                        Livestock Bio-Systems

                        




                        
                        POST DOC
                        Phone: (402) 762-4246
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1144 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1144

 Disapproving the cancellation transmitted by the President on August 
                 11, 1997, regarding Public Law 105-33.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 3, 1997

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself and Mr. D'Amato) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance for 
  seven days of session pursuant to section 1023 of Public Law 93-344

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Disapproving the cancellation transmitted by the President on August 
                 11, 1997, regarding Public Law 105-33.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 
disapproves of cancellation 97-3 as transmitted by the President in a 
special message on August 11, 1997, regarding Public Law 105-33.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1

SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

Earnings:

     Net Income........................................................  $9,135
     Interest:
        Expense incurred...............................................   9,055
        Amortization of deferred financing costs.......................     309
        Rental fixed charges...........................................      90
                                                                        -------
        Total                                                           $18,589
                                                                        =======
Fixed charges:
     Interest expense.................................................. $ 9,055
     Interest capitalized..............................................   2,455
     Dividends to preferred unitholders in Operating Partnership.......   3,105
     Rental fixed charges..............................................      90
     Amortization of deferred financing costs..........................     309
                                                                        -------
        Total.......................................................... $15,014
                                                                        -------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.....................................    1.24
                                                                           ====
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1507

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1997

Referred to the Committee on National Security

AN ACT

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal

Year 1998 to make certain technical corrections.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1507 RFH

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.

2 (a) IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE

3 CAPABILITY.—(1) Section 2302c(a)(1) of title 10, United

4 States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘of section 2303(a)

5 of this title’’ after ‘‘paragraphs (1), (5) and (6)’’.

6 (2) The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall

7 take effect as if included in the amendment to section

8 2302c of title 10, United States Code, made by section

9 850(f)(3)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act

10 for Fiscal Year 1998 to which the amendment made by

11 paragraph (1) relates.

12 (b) COMMEMORATION OF 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF

13 KOREAN CONFLICT.—(1) Section 1083(f) of the National

14 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 is amend15 ed by striking out ‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting in lieu there16 of ‘‘$1,000,000’’.

17 (2) The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall

18 take effect as if included in the provisions of the National

19 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 to which

20 such amendment relates.

Passed the Senate November 9, 1997.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of Wolverine
Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ David A. OwenDavid A. OwenChief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2008
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Peter Maloney, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keynote Systems, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 10, 2004