the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property under the
provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253(0).

All pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253.

FOREPERSON



FORFEITURE ALLEGATION

THE SPECIAL NOVEMBER 2002 GRAND JURY further charges:

1. The allegations contained in Counts One and Two of this indictment are realleged and
incorporated by reference as if fully restated here for the purpose of alleging fortciture pursuant
to the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253.

2. As a result of his violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and
2423(b),

DANIEL E. VON LOH,
defendant herein, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,
Section 2253, any and all right, title, and interest defendant has in any and all property used or
intended to be used in any mater or part to commit and to promote the commission of the
aforesaid violations.

3. The interest of the defendant subject to forfeiture pursuant to Title 18, United
States Code, Section 2253 include, but are not limited to, the following items: seized personal
computer and associated peripherals and seized floppy and compact discs.

4, To the extent that the property described above as being subject to forfeiture
pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendant:

(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of duc diligence;

(b) has been transferred to, sold to, or deposited with a third person;

(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;

(d) has been substantially diminished in value, or

(c) has been commingled with other property that cannot be subdivided without
difficulty;



4219

SNIGSOd “M TAVHOIA

a neg

“ ui

aessIOg

(A)ezpe pue (4) 7ZPZ SuoT OES
‘epop Seqeqs peaqtun ‘gT STATL :Jo suoTAeTOTA UT

TNAWLIDIANT

HOT NOA “ad THINYd
"SA

WOLUSNY JO SaLvLS Ga.LINN

NOISIAIC NYaLswa
SIONITII dO LOTeLsiId NeaHLYON
LYNOS LOIMLSId saivLs GdaLINn

7601 YO £0


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TLLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION
2YDGE CASTILE 0
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) FAN
) No. 03 CR 1092 ° 3C] AX iL Sad
Vv. ) Violations: Title 18, United States Code,
ae ) Sections 2422(b) and 2423(b).
DANIEL E. VON LOH. )

: MAGHS BATE: HIE MASON
ee bos Fink

COUNT ONE

The SPECIAL NOVEMBER 2002 GRAND JURY charges:

Beginning on or about October 26, 2003, and continuing until on or about October 28, 2003,
in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and elsewhere,

DANIEL E. VON LOH,

defendant herein, using a facility and means of interstate commerce, including interstate wire
communications and an internet communication-services account, did knowingly persuade, induce,
and entice “Person A,” an individual who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in sexual
activity for which the defendant could be charged with a criminal offense;

Jn violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b).

FILED

DEC 1 8 2093

corn TAFE W. DoBBiNs
RK U8, DIETRICT COURT



COUNT TWO

The SPECIAL NOVEMBER 2002 GRAND JURY further charges:

Qn or about November 13, 2003, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and
elsewhere,

DANIEL E. VON LOH,

defendant herein, using a facility and means of interstate commerce, including interstate wire
communications and an internet communication-scrvices account, did knowingly persuade, induce,
and entice “Person A,” an individual who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in sexual
activity for which the defendant could be charged with a criminal offense;

Tn violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b).


COUNT THREE

The SPECIAL NOVEMBER 2002 GRAND JURY further charges:

On or about November 14, 2003, at Schaumburg, in the Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division, and elsewhere,

DANIEL E. VON LOH,

defendant herein, traveled in interstate commerce from Madison, Wisconsin to the Norther
District of Minois, namely, Schaumburg, Ilinois, with the intent and for the purpose of engaging
in illicit sexual conduct, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with “Person A,” a 14 year old
female at least four years younger than the defendant, which conduct would be in violation of
Chapter 109A of Title 18, United States Code, if the conduct occurred within the special
jurisdiction of the United States;

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(b).