alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43669-43670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Listing of Members of the National Institutes of 
Health's Senior Executive Service 2021 Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: National Institutes of Health, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announces the persons 
who will serve on the National Institutes of Health's Senior Executive 
Service 2021 Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about the NIH 
Performance Review Board, contact Mr. Kha Nguyen, Director, Division of 
Senior and Scientific Executive Management, Office of Human Resources, 
National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room 1C31P, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892, telephone 301.594.3022 (not a toll-free number), email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#056e6d642b6b62707c606b456b6c6d2b626a73"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bf0f3fab5f5fceee2fef5dbf5f2f3b5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action is being taken in accordance 
with

[[Page 43670]]

Title 5, U.S.C., section 4314 (c) (4), which requires that members of 
performance review boards be appointed in a manner to ensure 
consistency, stability, and objectivity in performance appraisals and 
requires that notice of the appointment of an individual to serve as a 
member be published in the Federal Register.
    The following persons will serve on the NIH Performance Review 
Board, which oversees the evaluation of performance appraisals of NIH 
Senior Executive Service (SES) members:

Alfred Johnson, Chair
Courtney Billet
Michael Gottesman
Darla Hayes
Michael Lauer
Kathleen Stephan
Lawrence Tabak

    Dated: August 2, 2021.
Lawrence A. Tabak,
Principal Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2021-17039 Filed 8-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Principal Financial
Officer

Pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)



I, Paul Buck, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of CNS Response, Inc.
for the year ended September 30, 2013;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





|Dated:   January 28, 2014 | /s/ Paul Buck                   
|------------------------- | --------------------------------
|                          | Name:  Paul Buck                
|                          | Title:   Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Peregrine Oil & Gas, LP v. HRB Oil & Gas, Ltd. and VHPM, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-17-00180-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-45652

Trial court: 190th District Court, Harris County, Texas

Date motion filed: September 12, 2018

Party filing motion: Appellee

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Terry Jennings

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack, Justice Jennings, and Justice Lloyd.

Date: _10/23/2018 ___
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Public Horticulture and Engagement Unit: Washington, DC
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Washington, D.C. National Arboretum Public Horticulture and Engagement Unit People & Locations







Joseph  Meny
                        Public Horticulture and Engagement Unit

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid
                        Phone: (202) 245-5971
                        
                        
                        Fax: (202) 245-5973(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1511

To amend section 3165 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal

Year 1998 to clarify the authority in the section.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice,

considered, read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To amend section 3165 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 to clarify the authority

in the section.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.

4 (a) CLARIFICATION.—Section 3165 of the National

5 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 is amend6 ed—

7 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking out ‘‘under

8 the jurisdiction’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Los

9 Alamos National Laboratory’’ and inserting in lieu

10 thereof ‘‘under the jurisdiction or administrative
2

•S 1511 CPS

1 control of the Secretary at or in the vicinity of Los

2 Alamos National Laboratory’’; and

3 (2) in subsection (e), by striking out ‘‘, the Sec4 retary of the Interior’’ and all that follows through

5 the end and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘but not later

6 than 90 days after the submittal of the report under

7 subsection (d)(1)(C), the County and the Pueblo

8 shall submit to the Secretary an agreement between

9 the County and the Pueblo which allocates between

10 the County and the Pueblo the parcels identified for

11 conveyance or transfer under subsection (b).’’.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the provi14 sions of section 3165 of the National Defense Authoriza15 tion Act for Fiscal Year 1998 to which such amendments

16 relate.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended January 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael D. Andereck, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company



/s/ Michael D. Andereck
-------------------------------------

Michael D. Andereck
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 17, 2003
*

The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1831

LISA MARIE HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FOOD LION; MICHELLE WOUND, a/k/a Michelle

Young,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate Judge.

(3:06-cv-03430-BM)

Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 28, 2007

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.*

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lisa Marie Harris, Appellant Pro Se. David Andrew Williams,

Carmelo B. Sammataro, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia,

South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Marie Harris appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the Defendants on her civil action

alleging she was falsely arrested. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Harris v. Food Lion, No. 3:06-cv03430-BM (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2007). We also deny Harris’ pending

motions for general relief. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Angelo B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Respondent. Presentment Agency, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 794]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the Presentment Agency appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated October 18, 2010, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the Presentment Agency’s contention, the Family Court properly dismissed the petition for facial insufficiency *(see Matter of Christopher M.,*94 AD3d 1119 [2012] [decided herewith]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globus International Resources Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Yury Greene, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Yury Greene
----------------
Yury Greene
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
August 23, 2002


                                 Page 16 of 17
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6678

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROJEAN MORGAN, a/k/a Yusef Shabazz, a/k/a Eli, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-92-57-G, CA-97-531-2) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rojean Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Rojean Morgan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Morgan , Nos. CR-92-57-G; CA-97-531-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 1998). Morgan’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Public
Accountants

Board of Directors
Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc.Brookfield, Wisconsin

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-28299 and No. 333-52323) on Form S-8 of
Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2004, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholdersequity,
and cash flows for the year then ended, which appears in the December 31, 2003, annual
report on Form 10-KSB of Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc.

/s/ Wipfli LLP

Wipfli LLP

Milwaukee, WisconsinMarch 23, 2004
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred
Wilkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                                      /s/ Fred Wilkinson
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Fred Wilkinson
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      March 28, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 99-4379

LARON GRIFFIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston.

Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CR-97-943)

Submitted: December 22, 1999

Decided: January 14, 2000

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

N. Elliott Barnwell, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Miller

Williams Shealy, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Laron Griffin pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with the intent

to distribute and to distribute cocaine and crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C.

§ 846 (1994). The district court initially imposed a 210-month sentence. The district court thereafter granted Griffin's Fed. R. Crim. P.

35 motion to correct his sentence and, upon resentencing, reduced

Griffin's term of imprisonment to 168 months. Following the filing

of a timely notice of appeal, Griffin's attorney has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel

states that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but raises the

following issues: whether the district court erred in refusing to admit

privileged statements made by some of Griffin's co-conspirators to

their respective attorneys in the absence of a waiver of attorney-client

privilege and of their Fifth Amendment rights, and whether the polygraph questions that were administered to Griffin prior to his resentencing were overly broad and constituted grounds to reverse his

sentence. We have reviewed counsel's arguments, Griffin's pro se

supplemental brief, and the record, and we find no reversible error.

We have further examined the entire record in this case in accordance with the requirements of Anders, and find no meritorious issues

for appeal. This Court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for

further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may

move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
JERMAINE ANTONIO ARMSTRONG , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. ( 4:04

- cr - 00634

- TLW

- 1 )

Submitted : July 25, 2024 Decided: August 23, 2024

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jermaine Antonio Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6199 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Jermaine Antonio Armstrong appeals the district court ’ s order and amended judgment granting his motion for a sentence reduction under § 404 (b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194 and reducing his sentence to 3 36 months’ imprisonment and denying his motion for reconsideration

. Armstrong asserts that the court erred by increasing his sentence for the covered offense while reducing the overall sentence. We need not address Armstrong’s assertion because the court also stated an alternate sentence that does not raise the same issues. Thus, even if there was error, the error is harmless in light of the alternate sentence. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court ’ s order s and amended judgment

. We dispense w ith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6199 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit
99.1


MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION CONCERNING
COMPLIANCE






As of and
for the year ended October 31, 2006, except as noted below, Navistar Financial
Corporation (the "Company") has complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in Sections 3.02, 8.07 and Article IV of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Navistar Financial 1998-1 Dealer
Note Master Trust, Navistar Financial 2000-VFC Dealer Note Master Trust,
Navistar Financial 2004-1 Dealer Note Master Owner Trust, and Navistar Financial
2005-1 Dealer Note Master Owner Trust.






September
8, 2008




Navistar
Financial Corporation, as Servicer







By/s/:  PAMELA J.
TURBEVILLE


Pamela J. Turbeville


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer, Director and


Authorized Signatory for Navistar Financial Corporation)





By/s/:  JOHN
MULVANEY


John Mulvaney


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Finance and Accounting Officer, Director and


Authorized Signatory for Navistar Financial Corporation)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          40,076
<SECURITIES>                                     9,359
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                     342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         87,913
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,194
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,708
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,459
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>