alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.4


  Exhibit 10.4

   

  CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) IS THE TYPE THAT VIR BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. TREATS AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL.

   

  		
	AMENDMENT INFORMATION

	Agreement to be Amended:
	Grant agreement between the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Vir Biotechnology Inc effective March 16, 2018, as amended, and bearing Investment ID INV-009475/OPP1182112

	Amendment Purpose:
	No Cost Extension 

	Amendment Date:
	Date of this email  

	Amended “End Date”:
	The term of the Agreement is extended by changing the End Date to January 31, 2022



   

  							
	THIS AMENDMENT amends, and is made part of, the above-referenced Agreement and is effective as of the date of this email. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the meaning provided in the Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment will prevail.

	 

	 
UPDATED REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE

	This Amendment notifies You that the reporting and/or payment schedule for Your grant has changed. Your updated Reporting & Payment Schedule is deleted and replaced with the following: 

	 

	REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE 
	 

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	 

	 
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	 

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	 

	 
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	 

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	 
	 
	 

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	 
	 
	 

	 
	[***]
	 
	[***]
	[***]
	 

	[***]
	[***]
	[***]
	 
	 
	 

	Total Grant Amount 
	Up to $14,882,418.08
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00179

- CV

GLORIA MORGAN AND CL YDE DALE MORGAN

, Appellant s

v.

AMERICAN NATIONAL CR EDIT CORPORATION

, Appellee

From the 413th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. C200700369

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Pursuant to the motion, costs are

taxed against the party incurring same. Id. 42.1(d).

FELIPE REYNA

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 7, 2010

[CV06]
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research: Leetown, WV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Leetown, West Virginia Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research People & Locations







Vibha  Tripathi
                        Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician
                        Phone: (304) 724-8340
                         ext. 2193
                        
                        Fax: (304) 725-3451(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JUSTIN SEAN SNODDY

, Appellant,

v.

MALINDA FAYE MAYER

- SNODDY

, Appellee.

No. 4D 2 02 3

- 1600

[ February 8, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Lauren M. Alperstein

, Judge; L.T. Case No. FM CE 15

-

001254

.

Justin Sean Snoddy, Everett, WA, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, K UNTZ and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 11The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earningsper share:                   (Expressed in U.S. Currency)      Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30,   2006  2005  2006  2005 Numerator:                Net Income (loss) $(420,116) $(86,071) $(1,648,504) $137,646 Dividends on Series A preferred stock  (432)  (780)  (2,159)  (2,315)                              Numerator for basic and diluted loss pershare loss available to common shareholders $(420,548) $(86,851) $(1,650,663) $135,331                               Denominator:                Denominator for basic loss per share-weightedaverage shares outstanding  12,671,613   13,820,396   13,007,012   13,817,578 Effect of dilutive securities  —   —   —   11,053 Warrants  —   —   —   43,758              Dilutive potential common shares denominatorfor diluted earnings (loss) per share adjustedweighter-average shares and assumed conversion  12,671,613   13,820,396   13,007,012   13,872,389                               Basic income (loss) per share $(0.03) $(0.01) $(0.13) $0.01                               Diluted income (loss) per share $(0.03) $(0.01) $(0.13) $0.01
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RICARDO BOPP, Plaintiff,



### v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 

### etal., Defendants. ORDER) ) ) ) ) Civil Case No. 09-1736 (RJL) ) ) ) )

Forthe reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

# fa· 2,0 day ofSeptember, 2010, hereby ORDERED that Wells Fargo, World, and Wachovia's Motion To Dismiss [#5] is GRANTED; and it is further ORDEREDthat Wells Fargo, World, and Wachovia's Motion for More Definite Statement and to Strike Portions ofPlaintiffs Complaint [#6] is DENIED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED. 

# "

# ~ RICHARD ON United States District Judge
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range and Meadow Forage Management Research: Burns, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Burns, Oregon Range and Meadow Forage Management Research People & Locations







Tammi  Holliday
                        Range and Meadow Forage Management Research

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant
                        Phone: (541) 573-8916
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
ADDENDUM TO LICENSING AGREEMENT

         Addendum to Licensing Agreement between Venitech, LLC and Fresh
Ideas Media, Inc. dated March 14, 2005 and the Addendum To Licensing
Agreement Dated January 16, 2007.

         WHEREAS, Article 6, of the License Agreement, MINIMUM PROFORMANCE
BY LICENSEE, reads as follows:

        ARTICLE 6
        MINIMUM PROFORMANCE BY LICENSEE

         It is hereby understood and agreed that the minimum number of
Sub-licensee Agreements that the Licensee is obligated to sell within
the first twelve (12) month period starting at the signing of this
Agreement shall be three (3).  If a minimum of three Sub-licensee
Agreements are not sold by the Licensee during the 12 month period,
Licensor, at their option, may consider this Agreement null and void
and will have the right to sell a License in all or any part of the
Territory.  Thereafter, for any 12 month period, the Licensor agrees to
sell a minimum of four (4) Sub-licenses.

Whereas, the parties desire to amend Article 6 of the Agreement, it is
hereby agreed to by all parties involved that the above Article 6 of
the Licensing Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:

        ARTICLE 6
        MINIMUM PROFORMANCE BY LICENSEE

         It is hereby understood and agreed that the minimum number of
Sub-licensee Agreements that the Licensee is obligated to sell within
the first twelve (12) month period starting at the signing of this
Agreement shall be three (3).  If a minimum of three Sub-licensee
Agreements are not sold by the Licensee during the 12 month period,
Licensor, at their option, may consider this Agreement null and void
and will have the right to sell a License in all or any part of the
Territory.  Licensee shall sell an additional four (4) Sub-licensees
between March 14, 2006 and August 14, 2007 and thereafter Licensee
agrees to sell a minimum of four (4) Sublicenses during every 12 month
period from August 14, 2007.

         This addendum to the above named License Agreement is entered
into by the Parties on this the 30th day of October, 2007.


Venitech, LLC

By:  /s/Ruth Daily
     ------------------------
     Ruth Daily - Director


Fresh Ideas Media, Inc.

By:  /s/Phillip E. Ray
     ------------------------
    Phillip E. Ray - President




1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

0125 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139756 

CATHLEEN VON OPEL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139756 

 COA: 292084 

Oakland CC: 1997-600764-DM 

GEORG VON OPEL, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Peanut Research Laboratory: Dawson, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Technology
                        Patents & Licenses
                                    Technology Transfer and CRADAs
                                    NPRL SoftwareSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Dawson, Georgia National Peanut Research Laboratory People & Locations







Lavon  Bellamy
                        National Peanut Research Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Office Automation Clerk
                        Phone: (229) 995-7400
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Kevin F. McLaughlin,certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRAECISPHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:       May 5,2006

 
| /s/ Kevin F. McLaughlin |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Kevin F. McLaughlin     |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Projects
                        NP 301Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research People & Locations







Kathleen M Owens
                        Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid (Plants)
                        Phone: (806) 749-5560
                        
                        
                        Fax: (806) 723-5272(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### J. Robert Markel et al., Appellants, v Broadway Garage et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.), entered January 27, 1984, which was in favor of defendants, after a jury verdict.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The trial court erred in charging the jury with respect to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1152 (a), since, as all parties concede, plaintiff Robert Markel was not crossing the street when he was struck by the Edge vehicle. We find, however, that the clear import of the charge and the concept properly conveyed to the jury was that both motorist and pedestrian were required to exercise due care in avoiding a collision. Moreover, the court made it quite clear that, irrespective of a pedestrian’s location in the street, a motorist is required to exercise an overriding duty of care to avoid striking a pedestrian (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1154, since repealed). In light of this, and viewing the charge in its entirety, the error did not affect the result.

Finally, there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict in favor of defendants. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.