Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Notices 45957 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

41540 (July 10, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on Welded Carbon 

Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from 

Turkey: Respondent Selection,’’ dated September 

22, 2020. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘2019–2020 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded 

Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from 

Turkey: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated March 25, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from 

Turkey; 2019–2020’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

5See Toscelik’s Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipe from Turkey; Toscelik No Shipments 

Letter,’’ dated June 3, 2020, see also Yucel’s Letter, 

‘‘Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipe from Turkey; 

Yucel No Shipments Letter,’’ dated June 3, 2020; 

Yucel’s Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipe 

from Turkey; Comments Regarding No-Shipment 

Letters,’’ dated September 22, 2020; Cinar Boru 

Profil Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi’s Letter, 

‘‘Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes 

from Turkey (A–489–501),’’ dated June 19, 2020; 

Erbosan Erciya Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.’s Letter, 

‘‘No Shipment Certification of Erbosan Erciyas Boru 

Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (‘‘ERBOSAN’’) in the 2019– 

2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order Involving Certain Welded Carbon Steel 

Standard Pipe from Turkey,’’ dated July 9, 2020; 

Borusan’s Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon Steel 

Pipes and Tubes from Turkey, Case No. A–489–501: 

No Shipments Letter,’’ August 14, 2020. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members 

of the public may listen to this 

discussion through the above call-in 

number. An open comment period will 

be provided to allow members of the 

public to make a statement as time 

allows. Callers can expect to incur 

regular charges for calls they initiate 

over wireless lines, according to their 

wireless plan. The Commission will not 

refund any incurred charges. An 

individual who is deaf, deafblind, and 

hard of hearing may also follow the 

proceedings by first calling the Federal 

Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339 and 

providing the Service with the 

conference call number and conference 

ID number. 

Members of the public are entitled to 

submit written comments; the 

comments must be received in the 

regional office within 30 days following 

the meeting. Written comments may be 

emailed to David Barreras at dbarreras@

usccr.gov. 

Records generated from this meeting 

may be inspected and reproduced at the 

Regional Programs Unit Office, as they 

become available, both before and after 

the meeting. Records of the meeting will 

be available via www.facadatabase.gov 

under the Commission on Civil Rights, 

Minnesota Advisory Committee link. 

Persons interested in the work of this 

Committee are directed to the 

Commission’s website, http:// 

www.usccr.gov, or may contact the 

Regional Programs Unit at the above 

email address. 

Agenda 

I. Welcome & Roll Call 

II. Chair’s Comments 

III. Committee Discussion 

IV. Public Comment 

VI. Adjournment 

Dated: August 11, 2021. 

David Mussatt, 

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17547 Filed 8–16–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–501] 

Circular Welded Carbon Steel Standard 

Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that producers and/or exporters subject 

to this administrative review made sales 

of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable August 17, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4162. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on circular 

welded carbon steel standard pipe and 

tube products (welded pipe and tube) 

from Turkey. The period of review 

(POR) is May 1, 2019, through April 30, 

2020. Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of this administrative review 

on July 10, 2020.1 The preliminary 

results are listed below in the section 

titled ‘‘Preliminary Results of Review.’’ 

This review covers 20 companies. The 

sole mandatory respondent in this 

administrative review is Borusan 

Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret 

A.S. (Borusan Mannesmann) and 

Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. (Istikbal) 

(collectively, Borusan).2 On March 25, 

2021, we extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results by 120 days to July 

30, 2021.3 For a complete description of 

the events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4 A 

list of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as Appendix I to this notice. 

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is circular welded carbon steel standard 

pipe and tube products. For a complete 

description of the scope of the order, see 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Export price is calculated in accordance 

with section 772 of the Act. Normal 

value is calculated in accordance with 

section 773 of the Act. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Between June 3, and August 14, 2021, 

14 companies timely submitted letters 

to Commerce certifying that they had no 

sales, shipments, or entries of the 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR.5

With respect to Istikbal, one of the 

companies that certified no shipment 

during the POR, we continue to find 

Istikbal to be part of the single entity, 

Borusan, and we find no record 

evidence that warrants altering this 

treatment. Therefore, because we find 

that Borusan had shipments during this 

POR, we have not made a preliminary 

determination of no shipments with 

respect to Istikbal. 

With respect to the remaining 13 

companies that certified no shipment, 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) did not have any information to 

contradict these claims of no shipment 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
45958 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Notices 

6See Preliminary Decision Memorandum; see 

also Memorandum, ‘‘Welded Carbon Steel Standard 

Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey: U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection Information for 2019–2020 

Review Period,’’ dated August 12, 2020. 

7See, e.g., Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of 

Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipment; 2017–2018, 84 FR 

34863 (July 19, 2019), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4; see also 

Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 

65694–95 (October 24, 2011) and the ‘‘Assessment 

Rates’’ section, below, and Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 

15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and 

Partial Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 

51306, 51307 (August 28, 2014). 

8See Respondent Selection Memorandum. 

9This rate is based on the rate calculated for 

Borusan. 

10 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

11See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

during the POR.6 Therefore, we 

preliminarily determine that the 

companies listed in Appendix II did not 

have shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. Consistent with our 

practice,7 Commerce finds that it is not 

appropriate to rescind the review with 

respect to these 13 companies but, 

rather, to complete the review and issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on the final results of this review. 

Rates for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weighted 

average of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. 

Five companies, Borusan Holding, 

Borusan Mannesmann Yatirim Holding 

(Borusan Yatirim), Kale Baglann 

Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. A.S. (Kale 

Baglann), Kale Baglanti Teknolojileri 

San. ve Tic. A.S. (Kale Baglanti), and 

Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S. (Noksel 

Celik) remain subject to this 

administrative review because none of 

these five companies: (1) Was selected 

as a mandatory respondent; 8 (2) was the 

subject of a withdrawal of request for 

review; (3) requested to participate as a 

voluntary respondent; or (4) submitted a 

claim of no shipments. As such, these 

five companies remain as unexamined 

respondents. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

calculated a weighted-average dumping 

margin of 26.22 percent for Borusan for 

the period May 1, 2019, through April 

30, 2020. We assigned 26.22 percent, the 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

the mandatory respondent Borusan to 

the five non-selected companies in these 

preliminary results, as referenced 

below. 

Exporter/producer 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S./Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S ......................................................................... 26.22 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies 9

Borusan Holding .................................................................................................................................................................................. 26.22 

Borusan Mannesmann Yatirim Holding ............................................................................................................................................... 26.22 

Kale Baglanti Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. A.S ........................................................................................................................................ 26.22 

Kale Baglann Teknolojileri San. Ve Tic. A.S ....................................................................................................................................... 26.22 

Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S ............................................................................................................................................................. 26.22 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.10 The final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by this review and 

for future deposits of estimated duties, 

where applicable.11 Commerce intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

no earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where an examined respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent) in the final results of this 

review, we will calculate an importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment 

rate based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

U.S. sales for a given importer to the 

total entered value of those sales. Where 

a mandatory respondent did not report 

entered value, we calculate the entered 

value in order to calculate the 

assessment rate. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties at an ad valorem rate equal to 

each company’s weighted-average 

dumping margin determined in the final 

results of this review. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Borusan 

for which it did not know that its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States and for all entries 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Notices 45959 

12See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

13See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon 

Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from 

Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). 

14 Id. 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR 

351.303 (for general filing requirements). 

16See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). 

17See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

18 Id. 

19See 19 CFR 351.303. 

20See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

21See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

22See 19 CFR 351.310(c); see also 19 CFR 

351.303(b)(1). 

attributed to companies that we find 

had no shipments during the POR, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate such 

unreviewed entries pursuant to the 

reseller policy,12 i.e., the assessment rate 

for such entries will be equal to the allothers rate established in the 

investigation (i.e., 14.74 percent ad 

valorem),13 if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be equal to 

each company’s weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this review, (except if the ad 

valorem rate is de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero); (2) for previously investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit will continue 

to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the company participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, or the underlying investigation, 

but the producer is, then the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

for the completed segment for the most 

recent POR for the producer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 14.74 percent, the 

all-others rate established in the 

underlying investigation.14

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.15

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than seven days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs.16 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue, (2) a brief summary of the 

argument, and (3) a table of 

authorities.17 Executive summaries 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes.18 Case and rebuttal 

briefs should be filed using ACCESS 

and must be served on interested 

parties.19 Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.20

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party who wishes to request 

a hearing must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. Hearing 

requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of the issues to be discussed. 

Issues raised in the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, 

Commerce intends to hold the hearing 

at a time and date to be determined.21

Parties should confirm by telephone the 

date, time, and location of the hearing 

two days before the scheduled date. 

An electronically-filed request for a 

hearing must be received successfully in 

its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time within 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.22

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 30, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

VI. Discussion of the Methodology 

A. Comparison of Normal Value 

B. Level of Trade 

C. Affiliated Party and Arm’s-Length Test 

D. Cost of Production Analysis 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies With No Shipments 

During the Period of Review 

1. Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. 

2. Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. 

3. Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S. 

4. Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 

5. Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S. 

6. Yucelboru Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S. 

7. Cinar Boru Profil San Ve Tic. AS 

8. Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret 

A.S. 

9. Borusan Birlesik Boru Fabrikalari San ve 

Tic 

10. Borusan Gemlik Boru Tesisleri A.S. 

11. Borusan Ihracat Ithalat ve Dagitim A.S. 

12. Tubeco Pipe and Steel Corporation 

13. Borusan Ithicat ve Dagitim A.S. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17529 Filed 8–16–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–137] 

Pentafluoroethane (R–125) From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Affirmative Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 

Preliminary Affirmative Determination 

of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 

Postponement of Final Determination, 

and Extension of Provisional Measures 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES