alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Curtis W. Stoelting, Chief Executive Officer of RC2 Corporation, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RC2 Corporation;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
  Date: November 9, 2004
 
 /s/ Curtis W. Stoelting
 Curtis W. Stoelting
 Chief Executive Officer
  2P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than September 2, 2021.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco*                     (Sebastian Astrada, Director, Applications) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                

                    1.                     *Goldwater Bancorp, Inc.,*                     to become a bank holding company by acquiring Goldwater Bank, National Association, both of Phoenix, Arizona.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 28, 2021.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-16461 Filed 8-2-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
S. 1349

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation

with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the

vessel PRINCE NOVA, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOCUMENTATION OF THE VESSEL PRINCE NOVA.

(a) DOCUMENTATION AUTHORIZED.—Notwithstanding section 27

of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section

8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C.

App. 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the

Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel PRINCE NOVA (Canadian registration number

320804).

(b) EXPIRATION OF CERTIFICATE.—A certificate of documentation

issued for the vessel under subsection (a) shall expire unless—

(1) the vessel undergoes conversion, reconstruction, repair,

rebuilding, or retrofitting in a shipyard located in the United

States;

(2) the cost of that conversion, reconstruction, repair,

rebuilding, or retrofitting is not less than the greater of—

(A) 3 times the purchase value of the vessel before

the conversion, reconstruction, repair, rebuilding, or retrofitting; or

(B) $4,200,000; and
S. 1349—2

(3) not less than an average of $1,000,000 is spent annually

in a shipyard located in the United States for conversion,

reconstruction, repair, rebuilding, or retrofitting of the vessel

until the total amount of the cost required under paragraph

(2) is spent.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 04-C-4138

)

v. ) Judge George M. Marovich

)

CAPITAL TAX CORPORATION, et al., ) Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT MERVYN DUKATT’S MOTION FOR ENTRY 

OF FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 54(b) 

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 54(b), Defendant Mervyn Dukatt 

(“Dukatt”) respectfully moves for an order directing the entry of final judgment dismissing the 

claims against him, and expressly determining that there is no just reason for delay.

In the Court’s April 18, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and Order and Minute Order 

[Dockets 507 and 506, respectively], the Court dismissed the claims against Dukatt as timebarred. Since discovery is closed and the Court’s April 18, 2012 decision disposes of all claims 

against Dukatt, Dukatt respectfully submits that there is no just reason to delay the entry of a 

final judgment as to him, and that an order pursuant to Rule 54(b) may now be entered as to him.

WHEREFORE, Defendant Mervyn Dukatt respectfully requests that the Court enter an 

order directing the entry of final judgment dismissing the claims against him, and expressly 

determining that there is no just reason for delay.
2

May 15, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

Mervyn Dukatt, by his attorney

/s/ Mark Erzen

Mark Erzen

Mark D. Erzen, P.C.

321 North Clark Street, Fifth Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60554-4769

Telephone: 773-317-2832

Facsimile: 888-633-7936

Email: Mark.Erzen@ErzenLaw.com

2012-05-15 DUKATT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Mark Erzen, an attorney, hereby certifies that true and correct copies of (1) Defendant 

Mervyn Dukatt’s Motion For Entry Of Final Judgment Pursuant To Rule 54(b) and (2) Notice of 

Motion were served electronically on all counsel of record, as set forth below, via the ECF 

system, on May 15, 2012.

/s/ Mark Erzen

SERVICE LIST

Plaintiff United States

Alison C. McGregor

Sumona N. Majumdar

alison.mcgregor@usdoj.gov

sumona.majumdar@usdoj.gov

krystal-rose.perez@usdoj.gov

Kurt N. Lindland

kurt.lindland@usdoj.gov

deneen.ramsey@usdoj.gov

usailn.ecfausa@doj.gov

Connie Puchalski

puchalski.connie@epamail.epa.gov

Defenant Capital Tax Corporation

Michael D. Hayes

mhayes@vblhc.com

jkoronkiew@vblhc.com

sortega@vblhc.com

Norman B. Berger

nberger@vblhc.com

kjensen@vblhc.com

2012-05-15 DUKATT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
#### New York State Thruway Authority, Appellant, v KTATator Engineering Services, P.C., Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 848]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), dated April 19, 2011. The order granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
ex4-13.htm


    Exhibit 4.13

      


      


      


      


      


      


      CERTIFICATE
OF TRUST

      


      OF

      


      HORIZON
FINANCIAL CAPITAL TRUST II

      


      


      


      THIS
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF HORIZON FINANCIAL CAPITAL TRUST II (the “Trust”) is
being duly executed and filed by the undersigned on behalf of the Trust to form
a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. §§3801 et seq.) (the
“Act”).

      


      


      
        	
                 
      

              	
                1.

              	
                Name.  The
      name of the statutory trust being formed is Horizon Financial Capital
      Trust II.

              


      

      


      
        	
                 
      

              	
                2.

              	
                Trustee.  The
      name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with its principal
      place of business in the State of Delaware are as
  follows:

              


      

      


      Wilmington Trust Company

      1100 North Market Street

      Wilmington, DE 19890-1605

      ATTN: Corporate Trust
Services

      


      


      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Trust in
accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

      
 

      
        
          	 
      	
                  WILMINGTON
      TRUST COMPANY,

                
	 
      	
                  not
      in its individual capacity but solely as

                  Delaware
      Trustee of the Trust

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  By:

                	
                  /s/
      James P. Lawler

                
	 
      	
                  Name:

                	
                  James
      P. Lawler

                
	 
      	
                  Title:

                	
                  Vice
      President
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southwest Watershed Research Center: Tucson, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About SWRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Tucson, Arizona SWRC People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications

Mary Hennessey Nichols    Research Hydraulic Engineer Mary Nichols Mary H. Nichols is a Research Hydraulic Engineer with the USDA-Agricultural Research Service in Tucson, AZ (since 1991). She has a Ph. D. in Engineering from New Mexico State University. Her research interests include rangeland soil and water conservation practices and their legacy effects on landscapes, the use of high resolution photography in natural resource management, and dryland fluvial geomorphology and landscape evolution. Current projects include watershed restoration using low-tech rock check dams, quantifying rangeland watershed sediment yields, documenting and interpreting gullies and channel evolution in semiarid watersheds, and the use of ground based lidar for quantifying surface soil erosion processes.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Annual Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gary Stern, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the consolidated financial condition and result of
   operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ Gary Stern
                                       -------------------------
                                      Gary Stern
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 10, 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00997- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.R., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-04856J

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed October 25, 2018. The October 25, 2018 order is not a final appealable judgment because it does not dispose of the parties or claims. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies.2

Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson , 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

On December 10, 2018, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before December 21, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not file a response.
We dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
### Filed: February 17, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Nos. 98-2392(L) (CA-97-1534-A, CA-97-1859-A) Bryant C. Brooks, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Burlington Coat Factory, etc., et al, Defendants - Appellees.
ORDER The court amends its opinion filed December 30, 1998, as follows: On page 2, section 1, line 2 -- the judge’s name is corrected to read "Theresa Carroll Buchanan, Magistrate Judge." For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor ClerkUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2392
BRYANT C. BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE OF STERLING PARK, INCORPORATED; TYRONE E. GIBSON, Manager, Burlington Coat Factory; CHARLES E. HAYES, JR., Security, Burlington Coat Factory; MONROE MILSTEIN, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 98-2402
BRYANT C. BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TYRONE E. GIBSON, Manager, Burlington Coat Factory; CHARLES E. HAYES, JR., Security, Burlington Coat Factory; MONROE MILSTEIN, Defendants - Appellees.3Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa Carroll Buchanan, Magistrate Judge. (CA-97-1534-A, CA-97-1859-A) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryant C. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Joy Cummings Fuhr, Kimberly Rose Hillman, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: Bryant C. Brooks appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his civil actions. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and orders and find no reversible errors. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brooks v. Burlington Coat Factory , Nos. CA-97-1534-A; CA-97-1859-A (E.D. Va. Jul. 17, 1998 & Jul. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
free to reconsider the issue. Div. of Child & Family Servs., Dep't of 

Human Res., State of Nevada v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 

451, 92 P.3d 1239, 1243 (2004). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 1 

J. 

Douglas 

c-JAI 

J. 

Saitta 

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court 

Gerald Hardcastle, Senior Judge 

Abrams Law Firm, LLC 

Moran Law Firm, LLC 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'This order does not prevent petitioner from challenging any order 

holding her, her attorney, or her attorney's law firm in contempt by 

further writ petition. Emerson v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. 

263 P.3d 224, 227 (2011) (explaining that consideration of a writ 

petition challenging an order sanctioning a party's attorney is proper 

because the attorney was not a party to the litigation and therefore the 

attorney cannot appeal and has no other remedy available at law); Div. of 

Child & Family Servs., 120 Nev. at 449-50, 92 P.3d at 1242 (holding that 

the proper way to challenge a contempt order is through a writ petition). 

2
NUMBER 13-13-00582-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

CITY OF WAELDER, TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

LARRY STAMPS, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 25th District Court

of Gonzales County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on February 10, 2014 pursuant to an agreed 

motion to abate the appeal for purposes of settlement. This cause is now before the 

Court on appellant’s agreed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties 

have resolved the issues before the Court and no longer wish to pursue the litigation. By 

agreement, the parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, this case 
is hereby REINSTATED.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s agreed motion 

to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent 

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having 

dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, 

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

17th day of April, 2014.