alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Richard F. McGinty, OSB 86071 

P.O. Box 12806 

Salem, OR 97309 

503-371-9636 

Fax: 503-371-2879 

richard@mcginty-belcher.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

MIKE SEIBER, Case No.: 3:14-cv-01149-BR 

Plaintiff, ORDER 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

Based on the stipulation between the parties through their respective counsel it 

is hereby allowed that the Plaintiff is awarded an EAJA attorney fee in the amount of 

$5,919.80 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and costs in the amount of $0 pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1920, for at total of $5,919.80, subject to debt owed the US Government 

described pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 

130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt then the EAJA check shall be made out to Plaintiff's 

attorney and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's at: PO Box 12806, Salem, OR 97309-0806. 

If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

Page -1- ORDER 3:14-cv-01149-BR 

Case 3:14-cv-01149-BR Document 24 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 2
shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at the address 

stated above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this I 1.c,. b aay of November 2015. . 

Presented by: 

Richard F. McGinty OSB #86071 

503-371-9636 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Page -2- ORDER 

a. !) .A .~ ' , !'/f·it/vc~ . .J 

v I./ \/ (,-' ,,j_.__,_-1-y /" 

United States Distri~?court Judge 

3:14-cv-01149-BR 

Case 3:14-cv-01149-BR Document 24 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 2
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1347

AN ACT

To permit the city of Cleveland, Ohio, to convey certain

lands that the United States conveyed to the city.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1347 ES

1 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

2 For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘fair market

3 value’’ shall have the meaning provided that term by the

4 Secretary of Transportation, by regulation.

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO GRANT WAIVERS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law and subject to section 47153 of title 49, United

8 States Code, and section 3, the Secretary of Transpor9 tation may waive any of the terms contained in the deed

10 of conveyance described in subsection (b).

11 (b) DEED OF CONVEYANCE.—The deed of convey12 ance described in this subsection is the deed of conveyance

13 issued by the United States and dated January 10, 1967,

14 for the conveyance of lands to the city of Cleveland, Ohio,

15 for use by the city for airport purposes.

16 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS.

17 (a) FAIR MARKET VALUE OR EQUIVALENT BENE18 FIT.—As a condition to receiving a waiver under this sec19 tion, the city of Cleveland, Ohio, may convey an interest

20 in the lands described in section 2(b) only if the city re21 ceives, in exchange for the interest—

22 (1) an amount equal to the fair market value

23 of the interest; or

24 (2) an equivalent benefit.
3

S 1347 ES

1 (b) USE OF AMOUNTS OR EQUIVALENT BENEFITS.—

2 Any amount or equivalent benefit that is received by the

3 city of Cleveland shall be used by the city for—

4 (1) the development, improvement, operation, or

5 maintenance of a public airport; or

6 (2) lands (including any improvements to those

7 lands) that produce revenues that are used for air8 port development purposes.

Passed the Senate November 8, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1347

AN ACT

To permit the city of Cleveland, Ohio, to convey

the city.certain lands that the United States conveyed to
Exhibit
      32.2








**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of IBSG International, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey Birch, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IBSG
              INTERNATIONAL, INC.Date: November
              14, 2005
            By:
            /s/ Geoffrey
              BirchGeoffrey
              BirchPrincipal
              Accounting Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10067

Summary Calendar

GLORIA ANNETTE FORD

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MEDICAL CENTER OF MESQUITE; TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

3-07-cv-0678-L

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gloria Annette Ford, proceeding pro se, appeals the dismissal without

prejudice of claims that she brought but failed to prosecute, even after ample

warnings from the court. She provides no grounds on which the district court

erred and therefore the judgment of that court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 10, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
EXHIBIT 12.1

SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
(Dollars In thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                                                      <C>
Funds from operations before fixed charges:
       Net income (loss)                                                                                 $39,099
       Interest:
          Expense incurred                                                                                28,963
          Amortization of deferred financing costs                                                           744
                                                                                                             ---
          Total                                                                                          $68,806
                                                                                                         =======


Fixed charges:
       Interest expense                                                                                  $28,963
       Interest capitalized                                                                                5,383
       Rental fixed charges                                                                                  120
       Amortization of deferred financing costs                                                              744
                                                                                                             ---

          Total                                                                                          $35,210
                                                                                                         =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                                          1.95
                                                                                                           =====
</TABLE>

                                       34
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        516,910
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      5,599,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   753,366
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      1,859,848
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        1,948,100
<LOANS>                                    13,963,566
<ALLOWANCE>                                    60,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             23,374,600
<DEPOSITS>                                 15,793,881
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           832,851
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        4,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  6,743,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             23,374,600
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               307,537
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              56,468
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               85,033
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              449,038 
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            194,721
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            194,721
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         254,317
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               155,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               102,519
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    102,519
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   63,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.94
<LOANS-NON>                                         0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    0       
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              60,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           60,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1311

FRANCIS AKINRO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA MAHER, Deputy Assistant Attorney

General; GEORGE BUSH, President of the United

States of America,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA02-555-CCB)

Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm based on the

reasoning of the district court. See Akinro v. Maher, No. CA-02-

555-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 4, 2002). We deny Akinro’s motion for default

judgment. We also deny Akinro’s motion for oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Richard F. McGinty, OSB 86071 

P.O. Box 12806 

Salem, OR 97309 

503-371-9636 

Fax: 503-371-2879 

richard@mcginty-belcher.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JEREMY JENNICHES, Case No.: 6:14-cv-01281-SI 

Plaintiff, ORDER 

v. 

· COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

Based on the stipulation between the parties through their respective counsel it 

is hereby allowed that the Plaintiff is awarded an EAJA attorney fee in the amount of 

$5,872.85 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and costs in the amount of $0 pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1920, for at total of $5,872.85, subject to debt owed the US Government 

described pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 

130 S.Ct. 2521 (201 0). 

If Plaintiff has no such debt then the EAJA check shall be made out to Plaintiff's 

attorney and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's at: PO Box 12806, Salem, OR 97309-0806. 

If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 

Page -1- ORDER 6:14-cv-01281-SI 

Case 6:14-cv-01281-SI Document 20 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 2
shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at the address 

stated above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

y 

DATED this -zlJ day of July 2015. 

Presented by: 

Richard F. McGinty OSB #86071 

503-371-9636 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Page -2- ORDER 6:14-cv-01281-SI 

Case 6:14-cv-01281-SI Document 20 Filed 07/20/15 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 155 (Monday, August 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 45768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17413]



[[Page 45768]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) will submit 
the following information collection request to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, on or after the date of 
publication of this notice.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before September 15, 2021 to 
be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submission may be 
obtained by contacting Dawn Wolfgang at (703) 548-2279, emailing 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0656544745696b6b63687275466865736728616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87d7d5c6c4e8eaeae2e9f3f4c7e9e4f2e6a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a>, or viewing the entire information collection 
request at www.reginfo.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Number: 3133-0200.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Consumer Assistance Center.
    Abstract: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
Act (Dodd-Frank Act) (Pub. L. 111-203) authorizes the National Credit 
Union Administration (NCUA) to accept and resolve member complaints. 
NCUA has centralized the intake of consumer inquiries and complaints 
under the Consumer Assistance Center, via the MyCreditUnion.gov 
website. The Consumer Assistance Center assists consumers with 
information about federal financial consumer protection and share 
insurance matters and assists in resolving disputes with credit unions. 
Consumers can make inquiries or submit a complaint electronically 
through the MyCreditUnion.gov website. The on-line portal offers a 
template for consumers to use to aid in identifying their concerns.
    Affected Public: Individuals and Households; Private Sector: Not-
for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,209.
    By Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, the 
National Credit Union Administration, on August 9, 2021.

    Dated: August 10, 2021.
Dawn D. Wolfgang,
NCUA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-17413 Filed 8-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DOCUMENT NOT IMAGED DUE TO REASON[S] CHECKED BELOW

9 SEALED/RESTRICTED DOCUMENT (A court order is required to

view a sealed/restricted document.)

9 TOO VOLUMINOUS 

9 PHOTOGRAPHS

9 CIVIL BOND 

9 CRIMINAL BOND 

G MISCELLANEOUS [MC] CASE 

9 OTHER: __________________________________________________

TO VIEW THE DOCUMENT YOU MUST OBTAIN THE CASE FILE AT THE 

CLERK’S OFFICE. THE CLERK’S OFFICE IS OPEN FROM 8:30 AM. to 4:30

P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY EXCEPT FOR LEGAL HOLIDAYS. TO

OBTAIN A COPY CALL THE CLERK’S OFFICE SERVICE CENTER - COPY

DESK AT 312-435-5699. 

Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 313-2 Filed: 02/17/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4549
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7472

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL HAMILTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CR-94-66, CA-97-1296)

Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Hamilton seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hamilton, Nos. CR-94-66; CA-97-

1296 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Kathryn Tassinari, OSB # 80115 

William Critchlow, OSB # 91245 

HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. 

474 Willamette Street 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 686-1969 

kathrynt50@comcast.net 

Of Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JESSICA ANNE MEACHAM, ) 

) Case No. 6:14-cv-01108-SI

Plaintiff, ) 

vs. ) 

) ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY 

COMMISSIONER, ) FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA 

Social Security Administration , ) 

) 

) 

____________Defendant._________) 

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $5,289.33 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 

(EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this award shall be paid via check made payable to 

Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorneys at Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C., 474 

Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, the award shall be made 

payable to Plaintiff’s attorney if the commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the 

government through the federal treasury offset program. There are no costs or expenses to be 

paid herein. 

Dated this day of April 2016. 

______________________________ 

U.S. District Judge/Magistrate 

PRESENTED BY: 

s/ Kathryn Tassinari 

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C. 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

14th

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Case 6:14-cv-01108-SI Document 39 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fred Wilkinson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company. 
 
 
 /s/
David L. Weinberg
 David L.
Weinberg
 Chief
Financial Officer
 April 29,
2005
#### Christopher Lee SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Steven MILHAUSER, Physician Assistant; George Allen, Complaints Coordinator, Montford Unit; Christopher Trevino, Therapist, Montford Unit; Dana Butler, M.D., Physician, Montford Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-11113

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 14, 2011.

Christopher Lee Smith, Teague, TX, pro se.

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Christopher Lee Smith, Texas prisoner # 855314, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as factually and legally frivolous. *813By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Smith is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith because it is frivolous. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R.App. P. 24(a)(5).

Smith argues that the repeated rescheduling of a follow-up medical appointment and the failure to provide physical therapy as prescribed show that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. “Deliberate indifference is an extremely high standard to meet.” *Gobert v. Caldwell,*463 F.3d 339, 346 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and footnote omitted). To prevail on such a claim, the plaintiff must establish that a defendant denied him treatment, purposefully gave him improper treatment, ignored his medical complaints, “or engaged in any similar conduct that would clearly evince a wanton disregard for any serious medical needs.” *Id.*(internal quotations marks and footnote omitted). A delay in medical care violates the Eighth Amendment only if it is due to deliberate indifference and results in substantial harm. *Mendoza v. Lynaugh,*989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir.1993). As the district court found, Smith’s allegations and the medical records do not show that any defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs.

Smith’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983). The IFP motion is denied, and the appeal is dismissed. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202; 5th CiR. R. 42.2. Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel also is denied. *See Cooper v. Sheriff, Lubbock County, Tex.,*929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir.1991).

Smith is cautioned that the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike under § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Ham-mom,*103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir.1996). He is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will be unable to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

IFP MOTION DENIED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.