alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



CERTIFICATION
  Dated: November 9, 2005
    /s/ Michael W. BrennanMichael W. BrennanChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. Dated: November 9, 2005
    /s/ Michael J. HavalaMichael J. HavalaChief  Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The information contained in this written statement shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1452

To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 7, 1997

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 2001, the duty on a chemical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new item:

‘‘ 9902.32.44 Benzenesulfonic acid,

2,2′-(1,2-

ethenediyl)bis [5-

nitro- (CAS No.

128–42–7) (provided

for in subheading

2904.90.35.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2000 ’’.
2

•S 1452 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 enactment of this Act.

Æ
1

2 ‘0

3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

(5

4 FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

JESSICA GESSELE, ASHLEY ORTIZ, Case No. 14CV06380

NICOLE GESSELE, TRICIA TETRAULT,

CHRISTINA MAULDIN and JASON DL4Z, SUMMONS

both on behalf ofthemselves individually

and, in addition, on behalf ofthe other >1 7 similarly situated employees,

Plaintiffs,

8 vs.

JACK IN THE BOX INC., a Delaware

corporation doing business in Oregon as

“Jack In The Box Inc. A Corporation Of

10 Delaware,”

Defendant

11

12 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:

READ THESE PAPERS

13 CAREFULLY!

14 You must “appear” in this case or the other side will win automatically. To “appear”

you must file with the court a legal document called a “motion” or “answer.” The

15 “motion” or “answer” must be given to the court clerk or administrator within 30

days along with the required filing fee. It must be in proper form and have proof of

16 service on the plaintiffs attorney or, ifthe plaintiff does not have an attorney, proof

ofservice on the plaintiff.

17 If you have questions, you should see an attorney immediately. Ifyou need help in

finding an attorney, you may contact the Oregon State Bar’s Lawyer Referral Service i8 online at www.oregonstatebar.org or by calling (.303) 684-3763 (in the Portland

‘9 metropolitan area) or toll-free elsewhere in Oregon at (8oo) 452-7636.

20

21 DATED this 9th day ofJune, 2014 JON M. EGAN, P.C.

22

23 Atto

Jon’2 467

ey for intiffs

24

Page 1— SUMMONS

S4 M ROAN. PC

240SXflf SmEET LAKEOSW000. OR 97034-293 70r1,’,IcRE (53)697.3427.9.. (66)311-5629

RFO€GANL0GAt.7€AM C4

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of I

Case 3:14-cv-01092-HZ Document 1-1 Filed 07/09/14 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED LAUREL LEE BUESCHER ,

Appellant , v. Case No. 5D 21
- 295 LT Case No. 2012
- CA
- 38621 COLLINS BROW N CALDW ELL BARKETT & CARAVAGLI A AN D AAR ON V. JOHNSON , ESQ.,

Appellee s.

_______________________ __________ ________/ Decision filed August 2, 2022 Appeal f rom t he Circ uit Court f or Brev ard County, George Paulk , Judge. C arl J

. Hognefel t a nd Amir Ghaee nzadeh, of Amethys t L aw Gr oup , LLC , Tampa, for Appella nt

. Lissette M. Gonzalez and Scott A. Cole, of Cole, Scott & K i ssane, P.A., Miam i, f or Appellees. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. EVANDER , COHE N and WALLIS , JJ. , concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael D. Andereck, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Michael D. AndereckMichael D. AndereckPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 8, 2004
Exhibit 31(i).2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I,
George O. Elston, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of Juniper Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



/s/ George O. ElstonGeorge O. ElstonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)DATE: April 30, 2015
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Horticultural Crops Disease and Pest Management Research Unit: Corvallis, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Corvallis, Oregon Horticultural Crops Disease and Pest Management Research Unit People & Locations







Jessica  Schoenwald
                        Horticultural Crops Disease and Pest Management Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (541) 738-4047
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Quinn, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), all rendered January 13, 1984, each convicting him of one count of burglary in the third degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which *632could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No . 1 8 -3 0 95

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ W en d y Al i s o n No ra
l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l

A pp el l a n t

v
. In t ern al Rev en u e Serv i ce
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

Ap p el l ee

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ap p eal fro m

Un i t edSt at es Di s t ri ct Co u rt fo r t h e Di s t ri ct o f M i n n es o ta

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Su bm i t t ed : Oct o ber 1 5, 2 0 19 Fi l ed : Oct o b er 2 9 , 2 0 1 9 [Un pu b l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, an d ERICKSON, Ci rcu i tJ u d ges
.

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ PER CURIAM

.

W en d y N o ra ap peal s t h e d i s t ri ct co urt ’ s 1 d en i al o f h er t h ird m o t i o n fo r an
ex t en s i o n o f t i m e, an d d i s m is s al o f h er b an k ru p t cy ap p eal fo r fai l u re t o co m p l y wi th

1 Th e Ho n o rab l e W il h el m i n a M

. W ri g h t, Un it ed St at es Di s t ri ct Ju d ge fo r t h e Di s t ri ct o f M i n n es o t a.a co u rt -o rd ered d ead l i n e. Fo l l o wi ng a carefu l rev i ew, we co n cl u d e t h at t h e d i s t ri ct

co u rt d i d n o t ab us e i t s d i s cret i o n b y d en y i n g t h e ex t en s io n an d d i s m is s i n g t h e ap p eal

. See Sm i t h v
. Go ld Du s t Cas i n o , 5 3 6 F.3 d 4 0 2 , 4 0 4 (8 th Ci r. 2 0 0 8 ) (d i sm i s s a l fo r fai l u re t o p ro s ecu t e o r fai l u re t o co m p ly wi t h co u rt o rd er i s rev i ewed fo r ab u s e o f d i s cret i o n ); In re H arl o w Fay , In c., 9 9 3 F.2 d 1 3 51 , 13 5 2 -5 3 (8 t h Ci r. 19 9 3 ) (d i s t ri ct
co u rt ’ s d en i al o f req ues t fo r ex t en s i on o f fi l i n g d ead l i ne i n a b a n k ru p t cy ap p eal i s
rev i ewed fo r ab u s e o f d i s cret io n ). A cco rd i n gl y , w e affi rm
. See 8 t h Ci r. R. 4 7 B. W e al s o d en y No ra’ s ap p el l at e m ot i o n as m oo t

.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

-2

-
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Kevin F. McLaughlin,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

Date:       November 9, 2006
| /s/ Kevin F. McLaughlin  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Kevin F.  McLaughlin     |
| Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 7, 2015

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-1070

Lower Tribunal No. 14F-1339

________________



### Alan Feuer

, Appellant,

vs.



### Florida Department of Children & Families, etc.

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Children & Families,

Office of Appeal Hearings.

Alan Feuer, in proper person.

Leslie Hinds St-Surin, Assistant Regional Counsel

, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The only issue in this appeal is whether appellant, Alan L. Feuer, received

an order entered by a hearing officer in connection with appellant’s request for ahearing regarding his claim for benefits filed with the Florida Department of

Children and Families (“DCF”). Appellant claims that he did not receive the

subject notice and DCF correctly argues that appellant is presumed to have

received the notice because it was mailed to him in conformity with the systematic

business practice of the Office of Appeal Hearings. Although the presumption does

apply, it is a rebuttable presumption, and appellant is entitled to an evidentiary

hearing on the issue of whether he received notice of the issuance of the order. See

Reich v. Dep’t of Health

, 868 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

2
1 – OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

LUIS SANCHEZ-ALFONSO, 

No. 3:14-cv-01002-ST

Petitioner, 

OPINION AND ORDER

v. 

BOARD OF PAROLE AND

POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

AND CARLA PINTO, Probation 

Officer,

 Respondents, 

MOSMAN, J., 

On April 13, 2015, Magistrate Judge Stewart issued her Findings and Recommendation 

(“F&R”) [49] in the above-captioned case, recommending that a judgment be entered dismissing 

Petitioner Luis Sanchez-Alfonso’s petition for writ of habeas corpus as untimely. Mr. SanchezAlfonso filed objected to the recommendation that his petition was time-barred.

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may 

file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, 

but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 

make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or 

Case 3:14-cv-01002-ST Document 58 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 2
2 – OPINION AND ORDER

recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 

is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 

the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R 

depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, 

or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon review, I agree with Judge Stewart’s recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R [49] 

as my own opinion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 7th day of July, 2015. 

/s/ Michael W. Mosman ___ 

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01002-ST Document 58 Filed 07/07/15 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302

I, Emile Loria, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Epimmune Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2005

                                        /s/ Emile Loria
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Dr. Emile Loria
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Timebeat.com Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alexander Vileshin, President (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ ALEXANDER VILESHIN
-----------------------------------
Alexander Vileshin, President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 2.3

Eastern Division

George S. May International Company

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:04−cv−06018

Hon. Charles R. Norgle Sr

Xcentric Vventures, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, February 18, 2005:

 MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.:Motion hearing held on

2/18/2005 regarding motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction[36], Set deadlines/hearing as to

motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction[36] : Responses due by 3/18/2005 Replies due by

4/8/2005.(ewf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 39 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 1 of 1

George S May Intl, et al v. Xcentric Ventures, et al Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
Exhibit 31(i).1

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I,
Frank C. Condella, Jr. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Juniper Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



/s/ Frank C. Condella, Jr.Frank C. Condella, Jr.President and Chief Executive OfficerDATE: April 22, 2016