alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Databases
                        Alfalfa Transcription Factor Database
                                    iPhyClassifier - Phytoplasma Sequence ClassificationSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Selected Publications

Con J Baker
                     

                     Research Plant Pathologist


                     Phone: (301) 504-5617
                     
                     

                     Fax: (301) 504-5449
                     Room 016

                     10300 BALTIMORE AVENUE                            
                     
                     BLDG 004 BARC-WEST            

                     BELTSVILLE                    , MD 20705


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Ramon DIAZ-CORTEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71549.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 25, 2011.

Martin Lawler, Lawler and Lawler, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Oil, Jacob Bashyrov, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ramon Diaz-Cortez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision pretermitting his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Cerezo v. Mukasey,*512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

Because Diaz-Cortez failed to demonstrate a gross miscarriage of justice at his prior proceedings, he may not collaterally attack his 2004 removal order. *See Ramirez-Juarez v. INS,*633 F.2d 174,175-76 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam) (“This court has consistently held that an alien cannot collaterally attack an earlier exclusion or deportation at a subsequent deportation hearing, in the absence of a gross miscarriage of justice at the prior proceedings.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 305 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 305

  To authorize legal representation in Edward Paul Celestine, Jr. v. 
                    Social Security Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 21 (legislative day, October 20), 2011

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize legal representation in Edward Paul Celestine, Jr. v. 
                    Social Security Administration.

Whereas, in the case of Edward Paul Celestine, Jr. v. Social Security 
        Administration, No. 4:11-CV-3376, pending in the United States District 
        Court for the Southern District of Texas, the plaintiff has sent 
        subpoenas for testimony and documents to Senator John Cornyn and Senator 
        Kay Bailey Hutchison; and,
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent Members, officers, and employees of the 
        Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony or 
        documents relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Senator John Cornyn and Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison in this matter as 
well as any employee in Senator Cornyn's or Senator Hutchison's offices 
who may be subpoenaed in this case.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 18, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00707

- CR

Burdane Maurice GRANGER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Ap pellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B17780 Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is granted.

We order counsel for appellant, M. Patrick Maguire, to file the appellant’s brief by January 25, 2019. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying fu rther delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consi der a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary

circumstance.

________ _________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of January, 2019

.

__ _________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 149 (Friday, August 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 43233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16799]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee; Notice of Renewal

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and in 
accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, and following 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Fusion Energy 
Sciences Advisory Committee has been renewed for a two-year period. The 
Committee will provide advice to the Office of Science, on long-range 
plans, priorities, and strategies for advancing plasma science, fusion 
science and fusion technology--the knowledge base needed for an 
economically and environmentally attractive fusion energy source. 
Additionally, the renewal of the Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory 
Committee has been determined to be essential to the conduct of the 
Department of Energy business and to be in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Department 
of Energy, by law and agreement. The Committee will operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
adhering to the rules and regulations in implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel J. Barish at (301) 903-2917; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b485a5615595a495248537b4858525e55585e155f545e155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e2d3f33703c3f2c372d361e2d3d373b303d3b703a313b70393128">[email protected]</span></a>.

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on August 2, 
2021, by Miles Fernandez, Acting Committee Management Officer, pursuant 
to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with 
the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For 
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of 
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal 
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the 
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document 
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the 
Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on August 3, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021-16799 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DOCUMENT NOT IMAGED DUE TO ONE OR MORE REASONS LISTED BELOW:

9 TOO VOLUMINOUS

9 QUALITY NOT LEGIBLE

9 FONT TOO SMALL

9 PHOTOGRAPHS

9 OTHER: __________________________________________________

TO VIEW THE DOCUMENT YOU MUST OBTAIN THE CASE FILE AT THE 

CLERK’S OFFICE. THE CLERK’S OFFICE IS OPEN FROM 8:30 AM. to 4:30 P.M. 

MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY EXCEPT FOR LEGAL HOLIDAYS. TO OBTAIN A 

COPY YOU CAN CALL THE CLERK’S OFFICE SERVICE CENTER AT 

312-435-5699.

Case: 1:02-cv-03768 Document #: 285 Filed: 11/17/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2075
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 10.9



              CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR CERTAIN
               PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT. SUCH PORTIONS HAVE BEEN
            REDACTED AND MARKED WITH ASTERISKS (**). THE NON-REDACTED
                  VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SENT TO THE
                 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO
                   AN APPLICATION FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT.

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                                LICENSE AGREEMENT

Pursuant to Section 15.2 of the License Agreement dated as of April 15, 1999
between Pharmaceutical Applications Associates LLC, C. Donald Williams, M.D.,
C.G.P., Robert Murdock, R.Ph. and PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED (the
"Agreement"), the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as
follows:

Section 4.6 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:

                  4.6 In the event that Licensee elects, in its sole discretion,
to initiate a Phase III study of the Licensed Product, Licensee shall pay to PAA
the sum of *** dollars ($***) within sixty (60) days of the treatment of the
first patient.

Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

                  [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


<PAGE>




                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement as of this 25th day of August, 2000.

                                    PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED

                                    /s/     Marc A. Silver
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Marc A. Silver

                                    Vice President of Corporate Development

                                    PHARMACEUTICAL APPLICATIONS ASSOCIATES LLC

                                    By /s/ C. Donald Williams, M.D., C.G.P.
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  C. Donald Williams, M.D., C.G.P.
                                    Title:    President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Bradley, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered June 4, 1982, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Appeal held in abeyance and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and report in accordance herewith. The hearing shall be held with all convenient speed.

At trial, the two identification witnesses, who did not testify at the *Wade*hearing, stated that defendant was walked right past them at the precinct in handcuffs and in the custody of the officer to whom they had made street identifications earlier that day. In addition, one of these witnesses, Mackie Vielot, testified that she also identified defendant thereafter at an arranged showup at the precinct. Yet, at the *Wade*hearing, the court only considered the propriety of the initial street identifications and, finding them proper, did not consider the question of whether either witness had an adequate independent basis for an in-court identification of defendant.

It is apparent, upon this record, that both station house viewings of the defendant were suggestive *(see,*e.g., *People v Smalls,*112 AD2d 173; *People v Rogers,*81 AD2d 980), and, under the facts of this case, cannot be justified as confirmatory *(cf. People v Morales,*37 NY2d 262, 271; *People v Higgs,*111 AD2d 410) or harmless accidental station house viewings *(cf. People v Gonzalez,*61 AD2d 666, 671, *affd*46 NY2d 1011). Thus, it is necessary to examine these witnesses as to their independent basis for. in-court identifications at a new *Wade*hearing *(see, e.g., People v De Congilio,*71 AD2d 990; *People v Rogers, supra).*

In light of our decision that a new *Wade*hearing is required, defendant’s appeal will be held in abeyance pending Criminal Term’s determination at that hearing. Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 3.42
                          AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS

           MEMPHIS CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC., A TENNESSEE CORPORATION

                         Adopted as of November 1, 1996

                             ARTICLE I SHAREHOLDERS

         Section 1. Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of the shareholders shall
be held in the month of June in each year or at such other time as shall be
fixed by the Board of Directors, for the purpose of electing directors and for
the transaction of such other business as may come before the meeting.

         Section 2. Notice of Meeting. Written notice stating the place, day and
hour of the meeting and, in case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes
for which the meeting is called, shall, unless otherwise prescribed by statute,
be delivered not less than ten (10) nor more than two (2) months before the date
of the meeting, either personally or by mail, or at the direction of the
president, or the secretary, or the officer or other persons calling the
meeting.

                          ARTICLE II BOARD OF DIRECTORS

         Section 1. Number, Tenure and Qualifications. The number of directors
of the corporation shall be not less than one (1) nor more than four (4) as
established by the Board of Directors from time to time. Each director shall
hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his
successor shall have been elected and qualified. Directors need not be residents
of the state of incorporation of the corporation or shareholders of the
corporation.

         Section 2. Regular and Special Meetings. The Board of Directors may
call regular and special meetings.

                              ARTICLE III OFFICERS

         Section 1. Number. The officers of the corporation shall be a
president, vice president, a secretary and a treasurer, all of whom shall be
elected or appointed by the Board of Directors. Such other officers and
assistant officers as may be deemed necessary may be elected or appointed by the
Board of Directors. Any two or more offices may be held by the same person.

         Section 2. Election and Term of Office. The officers of the corporation
shall be elected annually by the Board of Directors. Each officer shall hold
office until his successor shall have been elected and shall have qualified or
until his death or until he shall resign or shall have been removed in the
manner hereinafter provided.

                             ARTICLE IV FISCAL YEAR

         The fiscal year of the corporation shall begin on the 1st day of
January and end on the 31st day of December in each year.
Case 1:03-cv-07255 Document 12 Filed 02/27/04 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-07255 Document 12 Filed 02/27/04 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-07255 Document 12 Filed 02/27/04 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-07255 Document 12 Filed 02/27/04 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:03-cv-07255 Document 12 Filed 02/27/04 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Soil Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Carl P. Ranno, Chief Executive Officer,  President,  and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno
---------------------------------------
Carl P. Ranno,
Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2004](the "Report"), I, John E. Gherty,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                          By /s/ John E. Gherty
                                             ----------------------------------
                                          John E. Gherty
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Classic Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lisah M. Frazier,
President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: July 19, 2004                                   /s/ Lisah M. Frazier
      -------------                                   ------------------------
                                                      Lisah M. Frazier
                                                      Chief Operating Officer
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
#### Hammock *v.*Battle.

June 25, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Thomas. Colquitt superior court. January *22,*1914.

*J. D. McKenzie,*for plaintiff in error. *T. H. Parker,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

A suit was brought upon a note containing a stipulation that it was given for the purchase-money of two mules “which I buy from J. J. Battle, to work on my place in Colquitt county, after a full inspection and without warranty; and it is expressly understood that J. J. Battle does not insure the health, life, soundness, or work of said mules, only the title thereto, and there are no other agreements than herein stated.” The maker pleaded that one of the mules was vicious and unfit for the use intended, and that with such knowledge the seller falsely and fraudulently represented that the mule was safe and suited for the use intended, and thus induced him to make the purchase; and he prayed to recoup certain damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the viciousness of the mule. *Held,*that this plea was properly stricken, because it was deficient in alleging fraud, in that it contained nothing to show that the defendant was misled or deceived as to the contents of the note sued on (which integrated the contract of sale), or in any manner was prevented from ascertaining the same. *Case Threshing Machine Company*v. *Broach,*137 *Ga.*602 (73 S. E. 1063). *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*