alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:577
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 2 of 20 PageID #:578
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 3 of 20 PageID #:579
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 4 of 20 PageID #:580
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 5 of 20 PageID #:581
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 6 of 20 PageID #:582
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 7 of 20 PageID #:583
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 8 of 20 PageID #:584
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 9 of 20 PageID #:585
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 10 of 20 PageID #:586
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 11 of 20 PageID #:587
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 12 of 20 PageID #:588
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 13 of 20 PageID #:589
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 14 of 20 PageID #:590
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 15 of 20 PageID #:591
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 16 of 20 PageID #:592
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 17 of 20 PageID #:593
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 18 of 20 PageID #:594
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 19 of 20 PageID #:595
Case: 1:03-cv-07198 Document #: 85 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 20 of 20 PageID #:596
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 12, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 2, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 716 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-119, CP2021-121.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-17165 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Heaton executor, *et al. v.*Haisten, administratrix, *et al.*

Atkinson, J.

The Civil Code, § 6138, declares: “No cause shall be carried to the Supreme Court upon any bill of exceptions, so long as the same is pending in the court below, unless the decision or judgment complained of, if it had been rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error, would have been a final disposition of the cause, or final as to some material party thereto.” An action on a promissory note, in which persons not parties to the original action were made parties and *590ordered to interplead, and upon *the*trial of which the verdict of the jury consisted only of answers to certain questions propounded by the court in terms of section 5422 of the Civil Code, is still pending in the superior court where tried, until the judge shall have made a written judgment or decree upon the verdict; and the Supreme Court will not exercise jurisdiction of a writ of error, brought before the rendering of such judgment or decree, to reverse the judgment refusing a new trial. Leave, however, is granted to enter the official copy of the bill of exceptions retained in the superior court pendente lite; and direction is given accordingly. *McGowan*v. *Lufburrow,*81 *Ga.*358 (7 S. E. 314) ; *Buford*v. *Kennedy,*85 *Ga.*212 (11 S. E. 561).

June 23, 1915.

Complaint; from Haralson superior court.

*J. M. McBride,*for plaintiffs in error. *M. J. Head, Griffith*d; *Matthews,*and *Hewlett, Dennis & Whitman,*contra.

*Writ of error dismissed, with direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of CVF
Technologies Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2006                     /s/ Jeffrey I. Dreben
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jeffrey I. Dreben,
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 15, 2006                     /s/ Robert L. Miller
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert L. Miller,
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Form 10-QSB
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company unless such
incorporation is expressly referenced therein.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Carbone, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered July *20,*1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of six years to life imprisonment.

Judgment affirmed.

The sentence imposed upon defendant was within the statutory limits and those limits were not unconstitutionally excessive as applied to this defendant *(see, People v Broadie,*37 NY2d 100, *cert denied*423 US 950).

Defendant knowingly, freely and voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charged offense and has no basis now to complain that the sentence was excessive. Defendant received precisely the sentence he bargained for *(see, People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 153 (Thursday, August 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 44465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17283]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11498]


Designation of Sidan Ag Hitta and Salem ould Breihmatt as 
Specially Designated Global Terrorists

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 
1(a)(ii)(B) of E.O. 13224, I hereby determine that (a) the person known 
as Sidan Ag Hitta, also known as Asidan Ag Hitta, also known as Abu 
Qarwani, also known as Abu Abdelhakim al-Kidali, also known as Abu `Abd 
al-Hakim and (b) the person known as Salem ould Breihmatt, also known 
as Abu Hamza al-Shanqiti, also known as Abu Hamza al-Shinqiti, also 
known as Hamza al-Mauritani, also known as Hamza Nitrik, also known as 
Cheikh ould Mohamed Saleck ould Abed, are leaders of Jama'at Nusrat al-
Islam wal-Muslimin, a group whose property and interests in property 
are blocked pursuant to a prior determination by the Secretary of State 
pursuant to E.O. 13224.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of E.O. 13224 that 
prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might 
have a constitutional presence in the United States would render 
ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order 
because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I determine 
that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to 
these determinations who might have a constitutional presence in the 
United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures 
authorized in the Order.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.
    Authority: E.O. 13224, Section 1(a)(ii).

    Dated: July 28, 2021.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-17283 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended January 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John H. Gray, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company



/s/ John H. Gray
----------------------------------

John H. Gray
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration
(Principal Financial Officer)
March 17, 2003
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings
per share:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30,
                                                                   1999           1998         1999          1998
                                                                ----------     ----------   ----------    ----------
<S>                                                             <C>            <C>          <C>           <C>
Numerator:
Net income (loss)                                               (1,355,210)    (1,062,916)  (2,444,054)   (2,648,727)
Dividend on Series A preferred stock                                (5,703)        (5,703)     (11,406)      (11,406)
                                                                ----------     ----------   ----------    ----------
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share - income (loss) available to common stockholders          (1,360,913)    (1,068,619)  (2,455,460)   (2,660,133)
                                                                ----------     ----------   ----------    ----------

Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share -
weighted average shares outstanding                              6,722,675      5,764,628    6,725,185     5,756,583
Effect of dilutive securities
Warrants                                                                --             --           --            --
                                                                ----------     ----------   ----------    ----------

Dilutive potential common shares Denominator
for diluted earnings (loss) per share adjusted
weighted-average shares and assumed conversion                   6,722,675      5,764,628    6,725,185     5,756,583
                                                                ----------     ----------   ----------    ----------

Basic earnings (loss) per share                                      (0.20)         (0.19)       (0.36)        (0.46)
                                                                ----------     ----------   ----------    ----------

Diluted earnings (loss) per share                                    (0.20)         (0.19)       (0.36)        (0.46)
                                                                ----------     ----------   ----------    ----------
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNo. 333-30412 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-39055, 333-43934, 333-51229, 333-58522, and 333-122387 on Form S-8 of our report dated September 15, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement scheduleof Pericom Semiconductor Corporation for the year ended July 2, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2007. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

San Jose, CA 

September 20, 2007
#### PURCELL v. LONG ISLAND CITY.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Schools—Discharge op Janitoh—Liability op City.

A city, the charter of which intrusts the care of the schools to the board of education and the trustees, is liable for the discharge of a school janitor in violation of a contract of employment made by them.

Appeal from circuit court, Queens county.

Action by Margaret E. Purcell against Long Island City to recover damages for breach of a contract in discharging plaintiff without cause from position as janitress of the new Fifth Ward school of Long Island City: From a judgment for $584.40, entered on a verdict directed by the court, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and DYKMAN and PRATT, J J.

William E. Stewart, for appellant.

I. Newton Williams, for respondent.

PRATT, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict directed by the court in an action for breach of contract in discharging plaintiff without cause, before the expiration of her contract. The plaintiff was employed as janitress for one year, commencing September 1, 1892, and ending August 31, 1893. It was the duty of the defendant, under its charter, to establish and maintain schools. The charter makes the board of education and the trustees the lawful instrumentalities of the defendant for caring for the schools, and the appointment of janitor is a reasonable and necessary part of their duties, and, in so acting, it is within the scope of their authority, and for the benefit of the defendant. This principle has been decided by this general term, in effect. See Leonard v. Long Island City (Sup.) 20 N. Y. Supp. 26. This case must stand as an authority until it is overruled, and renders any discussion unnecessary. There is no error in the rulings of the court upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. . All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (300)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,328
<PP&E>                                         664,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,097)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,277,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,833
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     737,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,277,647
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,310
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (18,857)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (14,225)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (16,297)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,008
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,008
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,428)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .90
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Munir Falaq, Appellant, v Everett W. Jones, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Respondent.

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term *860(Dier, J.), entered July 2,1985 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice John G. Dier at Special Term. Main, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### BARR, Appellant, v. MEAD et al., Respondents .(two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Actions by Harry P. Barr against John A. Mead and others. M. A. Ryan, for appellant. L. A. Gould, for respondents.

No- opinion. Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Orders filed.
Case: 1:01-cv-06329 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/01 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1
Case: 1:01-cv-06329 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/01 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:2
Case: 1:01-cv-06329 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/01 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:3
Case: 1:01-cv-06329 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/01 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:4
Case: 1:01-cv-06329 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/01 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:5
Case: 1:01-cv-06329 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/01 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:6
Case: 1:01-cv-06329 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/01 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:7
Case: 1:01-cv-06329 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/01 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:8
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14



I, Robert J. Stetson, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Stetson  
|Robert J. Stetson      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|Dated: May 10, 2004