alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1336 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 269
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1336

                  For the relief of Roy Desmond Moser.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 1997

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            November 6, 1997

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
                  For the relief of Roy Desmond Moser.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF NATURALIZATION OF ROY 
              DESMOND MOSER.

    Notwithstanding title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
any predecessor provisions to such title, or any other provision of law 
relating to naturalization, for purposes of determining the eligibility 
of Roy Desmond Moser for relief under the Agreement Between the 
Government of the United States and the Government of the Federal 
Republic of Germany Concerning Final Benefits to Certain United States 
Nationals Who Were Victims of National Socialist Measures of 
Persecution, signed at Bonn on September 19, 1995, Roy Desmond Moser is 
deemed to be a naturalized citizen of the United States as of August 8, 
1942.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 269

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1336

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                  For the relief of Roy Desmond Moser.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 6, 1997

                       Reported without amendment`
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:November 10, 2010/s/ ROBERT E. MEADRobert E. MeadChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-39055, 333-43934, 333-51229, 333-58522 and 333-122387 on Form S-8 of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation of our reports dated September 12, 2006 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule
of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation as of July 1, 2006 and for the year then ended, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of July 1, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of July 1, 2006, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP
|                            
|Palo Alto, California       
|                            
|September 13, 2006
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research: Mississippi State, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Mississippi State, Mississippi Crop Science Research Laboratory Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research People & Locations







Charles L Robinson III

(Trey)
                        Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Engineer
                        Phone: (662) 320-7530
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Improvement and Protection Research: Salinas, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Salinas, California Crop Improvement and Protection Research People & Locations







David C Milligan

(Dave)
                        Crop Improvement and Protection Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (831) 755-2861
                        
                        
                        Fax: (831) 755-2814(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**Exhibit 12.1.****                         ****Certification pursuant to Section 302of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act**

 

I, Ad Scheepbouwer, certify that:

 

1.                           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Koninklijke KPNN.V.;

 

2.                           Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                           The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for thecompany and have:

 

(a)                          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)                         Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)                      Disclosed in thisreport any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                           The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)                          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

 

(b)                         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

Date: March 10, 2006

 

Ad Scheepbouwer

Chairman of the Board of Management and ChiefExecutive Officer

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,101,520
<SECURITIES>                                   141,201
<RECEIVABLES>                                  787,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    504,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,056,259
<PP&E>                                         224,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,255,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,157,452
<BONDS>                                        868,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          456,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,133
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,018,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,255,057
<SALES>                                        647,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               647,753
<CGS>                                          420,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,665,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (79,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,585,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,585,811)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Gonzalez, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 215]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), dated September 30, 2010, which, *876after a hearing, denied his motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on September 5, 2008.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

A defendant who is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 enjoys *“a*presumption in favor of granting a motion for resentencing relief absent a showing that substantial justice dictates the denial thereof” *(People v Beasley,*47 AD3d 639, 641 [2008]; see CPL 440.46 [3]; L 2004, ch 738, § 23). However, resentencing is not automatic, and the determination is left to the discretion of the Supreme Court *(see People v Beasley,*47 AD3d at 641; *People v Vega,*40 AD3d 1020, 1020-1021 [2007]). In exercising its discretion, a court may “consider any facts or circumstances relevant to the imposition of a new sentence which are submitted by [the defendant] or the people” (L 2004, ch 738, § 23), including the defendant’s institutional record of confinement, the defendant’s prior criminal history, the severity of the current offense, whether the defendant has shown remorse, and whether the defendant has a history of parole or probation violations *(see People v Overton,*86 AD3d 4, 12 [2011]).

Here, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46. Considering the seriousness of the instant offense, the defendant’s criminal history, which includes nine other felony convictions dating back to 1980, his prior parole and probation violations, and the number of disciplinary infractions committed while confined, substantial justice dictated that his motion be denied *(see People v Rivera,*84 AD3d 980 [2011]; *People v Witkowski,*82 AD3d 913 [2011]; *People v Colon,*77 AD3d 849 [2010]). Florio, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Cohen, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cotton Production and Processing Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Cotton Production and Processing Research People & Locations







Jimmie  Castro
                        Cotton Production and Processing Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician
                        Phone: (806) 746-5353
                         ext. 117
                        
                        Fax: (806) 746-5028(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Patricia Nalbandian, Appellant, v Edward Nalbandian, Respondent.

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), entered March 25, 1985, which granted the defendant husband’s motion to compel her to appear for a further psychiatric examination and permitted counsel for defendant to be present during such examination, and (2) from so much of an order of the same court (Ritter, J.), dated May 28, 1985, as denied her motion for a protective order against a notice pursuant to CPLR 3121 demanding that she provide written authorizations permitting defendant to obtain copies of the records of any physician or any other licensed practitioner who has treated her for a psychiatric ailment.

Order entered March 25, 1985 modified by striking therefrom the authorization for counsel for defendant to be present during the further psychiatric examination of the plaintiff. As so modified, order entered March 25, 1985 affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Order dated May 28, 1985 affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with Special Term that the plaintiff wife placed her psychiatric condition in issue with regard to her claim for maintenance by asserting during her examination before trial that her inability to work was due to a psychiatric condition. *658Accordingly, the defendant was properly permitted to notice her for a psychiatric examination. For the same reasons, it was proper to deny plaintiffs motion for a protective order against defendant’s request for authorizations to inspect her psychiatric records *(see, Hoenig v Westphal,*52 NY2d 605). We find, however, that there was no basis for permitting defendant’s counsel, against plaintiffs wishes, to be present during the psychiatric examination. The cases cited by Special Term in support of its decision concern the right of the person being examined to have his or her own counsel present, not opposing counsel *(Ponce v Health Ins. Plan,*100 AD2d 963; *Jakubowski v Lengen,*86 AD2d 398). While it is true that defendant will eventually have access to the results of the psychiatric examination, we find that the plaintiff is entitled to be examined only in the presence of the examining physician, and her own counsel if that be her desire *(see, Ponce v Health Ins. Plan, supra).*With respect to plaintiffs own counsel, we would add that if he is present, he is not to interfere with the conduct of the examination *(see, Rosenblitt v Rosenblitt,*107 AD2d 292, 300-301 [partial concurring and dissenting opn of Lazer, J. P.]). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 10 Filed: 06/09/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:20
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 10 Filed: 06/09/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:21
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 10 Filed: 06/09/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:22