alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Natasha Martin, an Infant, by Mary Martin, Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Respondent, v Nassau County Commission on Human Rights et al., Appellants.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated May 28, 1985, which denied their motion for a protective order striking the plaintiff’s notice for discovery and inspection.

Order modified, by granting the defendants’ motion for a protective order solely to the extent of (1) limiting items Nos. 8 and 10 of the plaintiff’s notice for discovery and inspection to the names, positions and business addresses of the employees specified therein, and (2) limiting items Nos. 9 and 16 thereof to those instances where defendant Lloyd was operating a motor vehicle. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The defendants’ time to comply with the notice for discovery and inspection is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Certain items in plaintiff’s notice for discovery and inspection were either overbroad or not material and necessary to the action. Accordingly, the order appealed from, which denied defendant’s motion for a protective order, has been modified to the extent indicated *(see generally, Allen v Crowell-Collier Pub. Co.,*21 NY2d 403; *Rios v Donovan,*21 AD2d 409; *Green v Carey Transp.,*38 AD2d 711; *Turner v Town of Amherst,*62 Misc 2d 257). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 43718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17042]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from 
Neville Peterson LLP on behalf of Trinity Industries, Inc. (WB21-53--8/
4/21) for permission to use select data from the Board's 2019 Masked 
Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of this request may be obtained from the 
Board's website under docket no. WB21-53.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.

Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2021-17042 Filed 8-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 6, 2016

p0829 

# Order

Clerk September 6, 2016

152039

- 40(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152039

- 40

COA: 326261; 326580

Oakland CC: 2001

- 177490

- FC;

ROGER BRIAN HESS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 24, 2016

order is considered, and it is DENIED, be cause it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 105 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 105

 To repeal the habeas corpus requirement that a Federal court defer to 
State court judgments and uphold a conviction regardless of whether the 
  Federal court believes that the State court erroneously interpreted 
 constitutional law, except in cases where the Federal court believes 
            the State court acted in an unreasonable manner.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 1997

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the habeas corpus requirement that a Federal court defer to 
State court judgments and uphold a conviction regardless of whether the 
  Federal court believes that the State court erroneously interpreted 
 constitutional law, except in cases where the Federal court believes 
            the State court acted in an unreasonable manner.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE REQUIREMENT THAT A FEDERAL COURT DEFER TO A 
              STATE COURT UNLESS THE STATE COURT ACTED IN AN 
              UNREASONABLE MANNER IN HABEAS CORPUS CASES.

    (a) Repeal.--Subsection (d) of section 2254 of title 28, United 
States Code, is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2264(b) of title 28, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``, (d),''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 149 (Friday, August 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43303-43304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16819]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17072 and #17073; Oklahoma Disaster Number OK-
00151]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Oklahoma

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-
4587-DR), dated 07/30/2021.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms.
    Incident Period: 02/08/2021 through 02/20/2021.

DATES: Issued on 07/30/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/28/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/02/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration,

[[Page 43304]]

409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 07/30/2021, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties: Alfalfa, Bryan, Grant, Kiowa, Latimer, Love, 
Marshall, Pittsburg, Stephens.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.000
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17072 B 
and for economic injury is 17073 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-16819 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
****
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Emeritus Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Raymond R. Brandstrom, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 1.
The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 
 2.
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 /s/    Raymond R. Brandstrom
 Raymond R. Brandstrom
 Chief Financial Officer
 January 26, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0677

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

GILBERT CAMPA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 14, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 7 2023

06/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0677
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 2.3

Eastern Division

Katherine Albrecht, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:03−cv−06472

Hon. Morton

Denlow

Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, March 2, 2005:

 MINUTE entry before Judge Sidney I. Schenkier : Settlement Conference reset for

3/9/2005 at 10:00 AM.Mailed notice(mmm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 58 Filed: 03/02/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:394
EXHIBIT
32.2





PERICOM
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this annual report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended June 27, 2009 (the
“Report”), I, Angela Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:


(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




September
25, 2009




By:
              /s/ Angela ChenAngela
      ChenChief
      Financial OfficerPericom
      Semiconductor Corporation
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 14, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00784

- CV

KARGES

- FAULCONBRIDGE, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Keath GARRISON and Kassie Garrison, Individually and as Next Friends of Karrah Garrison

and Mayvie Garrison, Minor Children; Haela Garrison; Ernest D. Copelin, Individually and as

Representative of the Estate of Roper T. Nathon Copelin, Deceased; Tange la M. Copelin; Texas

Mutual Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Keath Garrison and Roper T. Nathan Copelin,

D eceased,

Appellee s

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI00853

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting : Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justic e

Beth Watkins, Justice

The motion for rehearing filed by appellant Karges

- Faulconbridge, Inc. is granted. We

order this appeal reinstated onto the active docket of this court. We further order appellant’s brief

due February 13, 2020.

I t is so ORDERED on this 14th day of January, 2020

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of David Wanton, Petitioner, v Thomas Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Third Department,

June 5, 1986

*377APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*David Wanton,*petitioner *pro se.*

*Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Denise A. Hartman*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Casey, J.

Petitioner’s arguments are limited to claims that he was denied due process by the manner in which the Superintendent’s proceeding was conducted, but fundamental to our review is the requirement that the record contain substantial evidence to support the determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services *(see, Matter of Alvarado v LeFevre,*111 AD2d 475, 476). We find such evidence lacking and, therefore, annul the determination.

The record contains a misbehavior report prepared and signed by Sergeant Charles Ripley, who arrived at the scene after the alleged assault had occurred. Ripley clearly had no firsthand knowledge of the facts and circumstances, for he stated in his report that "[a]ll this evidence was concluded by me, Sgt. Ripley, from an investigation”. The report contains a reference to an event observed by Correction Officer C. La Croix, but La Croix did not sign or initial the report; nor did he testify at the hearing. In *People ex rel. Vega v Smith*(66 NY2d 130, 139-140), the court held that misbehavior reports can form sufficient bases to support prison disciplinary determinations, but each of the reports in *Vega*contained a detailed description of an incident which the author claimed to have witnessed and was indorsed or initialed by one or more other correction officers. The report herein falls far short of those in *Vega*in terms of relevance and probative value.

The record also contains an interdepartmental communication, labeled confidential, in which Ripley reported the results of his interview with a witness who incriminated petitioner. As in *Matter of Alvarado v LeFevre (supra),*we see no reason why the hearing officer could not have personally interviewed the witness in camera rather than rely on the third-party *378assessment by Ripley, whose report is itself hearsay *(cf. Matter of Hickman v Coughlin,*115 AD2d 105).

It appears that the determination was also based in part upon certain physical evidence, i.e., a knife and a bloody sweatshirt, but these items do not connect petitioner to the assault. It is our view, therefore, that the evidence relied upon by the Commissioner is so lacking in relevance and probative value that no reasonable mind would accept it as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact *(cf. 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180).

Kane, J. P., Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.

Determination annulled, without costs, petition granted, and respondents are directed to expunge all references to this proceeding from petitioner’s files and to restore any good time taken from petitioner as a result thereof.
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board
of Directors and Shareholders
 Emeritus
Corporation
  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-145862,
333-138414, 333-126106, 333-60323, 333-05965 and 333-70580) on Form S-8 and
(Nos. 333-148400, 333-141801 and 333-20805) on Form S-3 of Emeritus Corporation
of our reports dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Emeritus Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,2007
and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’
equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K
of Emeritus Corporation.
  Our
report dated March 17, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, contains an explanatory
paragraph that states management excluded from its assessment of the
effectiveness of Emeritus Corporation’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, Summerville Senior Living, Inc.’s
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit of internal control over
financial reporting of Emeritus Corporation also excluded an evaluation of the
internal control over financial reporting of Summerville Senior Living,
Inc.
  Our
report refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
effective January 1, 2006.
  
  
  /s/ KPMG
LLP
  
  (signed)
KPMG LLP
  
  Seattle,
Washington
  March 17,
2008
#### In the Matter of Carlos Abreu, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[945 NYS2d 587]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Seneca County [Dennis F. Bender, A.J.], entered September 22, 2011) to review determinations of respondent. The determinations found after Tier III hearings that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ordered that the determinations are unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GELTEX
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      30,874,900
<SECURITIES>                                74,077,436
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           119,040,047
<PP&E>                                      11,319,885
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,420,415)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             133,444,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,218,742
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       167,924
<OTHER-SE>                                 119,851,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               133,444,785
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,658,232
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,145,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             613,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,567,318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,567,318)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.72)
        

</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER 

### W ITHDRAWING 

### M EDIATION 

### O RDER

Cause number: 01

- 13

- 01061

- CV

Style: Miriam Blank v. Jack Nuszen

Date motion filed: January 17, 2014

Type of Motion: Objection to Mediation

Party fil ing motion: Appellee



### It is ordered that Appellee = s objection to mediation is granted. We withdraw our

Mediation Order dated January 9, 2014.

Judge’s S ignature: /s/ Terry Jennings

x Acting individually

Date: January 21, 2014

* Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for

motion to extend time to file a brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.3(a).

Note : Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion

for rehearing. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.4(a).