alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 149 (Friday, August 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 43310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16777]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free 
Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 14, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee will be held Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 
11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information please contact 
Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP 
Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 2, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-16777 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 13-2531

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v. Matt McDermott lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________ Submitted: December 20, 2013 Filed: December 23, 2013 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Matt McDermott directly appeals th e order of the district court 1 modifying the terms of his probation. Upon careful revie w, we reject McDermott’s claim that the

1 The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United Stat es District Judge for the District of Nebraska.district court was biased against him and conclude that his other arguments on appeal lack merit. The district court committed no abuse of discretion. Cf. United States v. Leigh , 276 F.3d 1011, 1012 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (revocation of probation is reviewed for abuse of discretion and requires only enough evidence, within sound judicial discretion, to satisfy district judge that conduct of probationer has not met conditions of probation). 2 We thus affirm the order of the distri ct court. We also deny McDermott’s pending motion.

______________________________

2 To the extent McDermott has attempte d to assert a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, he first did so in his reply brief, and we decline to consider it. See Jenkins v. Winter , 540 F.3d 742, 751 (8th Cir. 2008) (“Claims not raised in an opening brief are deemed waived. . . . This court does not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal in a reply brief.”). -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      88,542,900
<RECEIVABLES>                              227,881,600
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                      148,564,800
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                          8,320,100
<PP&E>                                       1,838,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             538,875,300
<SHORT-TERM>                                29,500,000
<PAYABLES>                                 293,428,100
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                        147,089,500
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                           1,339,000
<LONG-TERM>                                  7,544,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       863,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,789,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               538,875,300
<TRADING-REVENUE>                           16,073,000
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                        20,988,500
<COMMISSIONS>                               14,287,200
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>               10,362,900
<FEE-REVENUE>                                5,247,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,331,400
<COMPENSATION>                              34,163,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,538,700)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 (2,538,700)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,699,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of IBSG International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael Rivers, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date:  May 12, 2005 |  | IBSG INTERNATIONAL, INC.BY: /S/ Michael Rivers
Michael Rivers President, Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case: 1:01-cv-07716 Document #: 2 Filed: 08/02/02 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8
Case: 1:01-cv-07716 Document #: 2 Filed: 08/02/02 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:9
#### Jon Jonasse, Respondent, v Karen Jonasse (Gorman), Appellant.

— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without *998costs, petition reinstated, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for a hearing, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant’s application for an upward modification of child support based on the age of the children and an increase in the cost of living *(see, Matter of Brescia v Fitts,*56 NY2d 132, 139-140; *cf. Matter of Boden v Boden,*42 NY2d 210) should not have been denied without a hearing inasmuch as the moving papers raise disputed issues of fact *(see, Van Niel v Van Niel,*93 AD2d 986). We remit this matter, therefore, so that the court may conduct a hearing to determine whether the alleged changes warrant modification *(see, Huber v Huber,*59 AD2d 1063; *Matter of Monesi v Monesi,*55 AD2d 1020; *Rollins v Rollins,*33 AD2d 990). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — child support.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Horticultural Crops Production and Genetic Improvement Research Unit: Corvallis, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Corvallis, Oregon Horticultural Crops Production and Genetic Improvement Research Unit People







Suean  Ott    Biological Science Technician Suean Ott Biological Science Technician 541-738-4045 suean.ott@ars.usda.gov  Scagel Lab


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# Official Journal L 1/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.001.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 544 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.001.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 1

English edition

Legislation

Volume 544 January 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1/2011 of 3 January 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 2/2011 of 3 January 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year | 3 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Commission Directive 2011/1/EU of 3 January 2011 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include 6-Benzyladenine as active substance and amending Decision 2008/941/EC (1) | 5 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/1/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 20 July 2010 on the State aid scheme C 38/09 (ex NN 58/09) which Spain is planning to implement for Corporación de Radio y Televisión Española (RTVE)
  (notified under document C(2010) 4925)

   (1) | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1/2011 of 3 January 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EU) No 2/2011 of 3 January 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year

3

DIRECTIVES

*

Commission Directive 2011/1/EU of 3 January 2011 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include 6-Benzyladenine as active substance and amending Decision 2008/941/EC (1)

5

DECISIONS

2011/1/EU

*

Commission Decision of 20 July 2010 on the State aid scheme C 38/09 (ex NN 58/09) which Spain is planning to implement for Corporación de Radio y Televisión Española (RTVE)
  (notified under document C(2010) 4925)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2010) 4925)

9

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
_________________________________________ 

 

_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

__________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 10, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129341(34) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. IN RE PETITION BY TREASURER OF Stephen J. Markman, WAYNE COUNTY FOR FORECLOSURE Justices 

WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER,

Petitioner,

and 

MATTHEW TATARIAN and MICHAEL KELLY, 

Intervening Parties-Appellants, 

 SC: 129341 

v CoA: 261074

 Wayne CC: 02-220192-PZ 

PERFECTING CHURCH, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Michigan Association of 

County Treasurers for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is GRANTED. The 

request for leave to participate in oral argument is DENIED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 10, 2006 

Clerk
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terral TOOLE, aka Alex Noralez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50153.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 15, 2011.

Stephanie Yonekura McCaffrey, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Arthur Henry Weed, Esquire, Santa Barbara, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Terral Toole appeals his sentence following a guilty plea to several counts of wire fraud and money laundering, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1957, 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

In calculating the Sentencing Guidelines range, a victim’s “loss” under U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(l) is reduced by “the amount the victim has recovered at the time of sentencing from disposition of the collateral” when, as here, there is collateral pledged by the defendant. U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 cmt. n. 3(E)(ii). Construing similar language, we have held that the loss should be offset by the “actual sale proceeds” the lender “has recovered.” *United States v. Davoudi,*172 F.3d 1130, 1135 (9th Cir.1999).

The district court appropriately determined the amount of loss based on the actual sale prices of the collateral proper*114ties to third parties as opposed to the prices listed on the trustee’s deeds. There was evidence in the record that the lenders did not recover any proceeds in conjunction with the trustee’s deeds, and that they only recovered “actual sale proceeds” upon the sale of the properties to third parties. *See Davoudi,*172 F.3d at 1135.

The Supreme Court’s decision in *BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp.,*511 U.S. 531, 114 S.Ct. 1757, 128 L.Ed.2d 556 (1994) in no way counsels otherwise. In that case, the Court interpreted the phrase “reasonably equivalent value” in 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1)(B)© (formerly § 548(a)(2)) to mean “the price in fact received at the foreclosure sale,” assuming state law is complied with. *Id.*at 545, 114 S.Ct. 1757. The case has no application to the calculation of loss under the Sentencing Guidelines in this case.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 4619** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. QUANMAINE DA

- SHON BROWN, a/k/a Quan , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:13

- cr - 00843

- RBH

- 3 )

Submitted : March 23, 2015 Decided: April 1, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jeffrey Mikell Johnson, Eutawville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Quanmaine Da

- Shon Brown pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribute cocaine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2012). The district court sentenced Brown to 120 months of imprisonment and he now appeals. Appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), concluding that there are no meritorious issues for review. Finding no error, we affirm. We have thoroughly reviewe d the record and conclude that the district court committed no error in accepting Brown’s guilty plea and sentencing Brown to the statutory mandatory minimum term of imprisonment. The court complied with the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 in acceptin g Brown’s guilty plea and we conclude that Brown’s plea was knowing and voluntary. We further conclude that the sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United
States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007)
. We have examined the entire record i n accordance with the requirements of Anders and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. This court requires that counsel inform Brown, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Brown requests that a3 petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must
state that a copy thereof was served on Brown. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Force Protection, Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q/A”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q/A. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: February 25,   2013 | /s/ Mark C. Roualet           |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                      | Mark C. Roualet*President*    |
|                      |                          |
|                      |                          |
| Date: February 25,   2013 | /s/ Evelyn Milam              |
|                      | Evelyn Milam *Vice President* |

 

This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1272 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1272

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ARCELLA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 8, 1997

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ARCELLA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106 through 12108 of 
title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue 
a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel ARCELLA, United States 
official number 1025983.
                                 <all>
```