41446 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices 

1See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

1See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of 

Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 57145 

(November 4, 2009) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 69586 

(November 3, 2020). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

511 (January 6, 2021). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Diamond Sawblades and 

Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China 

Administrative Review 2019–2020: Respondent 

Selection,’’ dated March 2, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and 

Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

6See Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond 

Sawblades from the People’s Republic of China— 

No Sales Certification,’’ dated February 5, 2021; 

Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., 

Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Submission of Statement of No Shipments,’’ dated 

February 4, 2021; Danyang Weiwang Tools 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond 

Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Submission of Statement of No 

Shipments,’’ dated January 20, 2021; Husqvarna 

(Hebei) Co., Ltd.’s and Husqvarna Construction 

Products North America’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond 

Sawblades from the People’s Republic of China: 

Notification of No Shipments,’’ dated January 12, 

2021; Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial 

Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘No Shipment Letter for Weihai 

Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.: 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ dated February 12, 

2021; and, Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools 

Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Submission of Statement of No Shipments,’’ dated 

January 18, 2021. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘No shipment inquiry with 

respect to the companies below during the period 

11/01/2019 through 10/31/2020,’’ dated March 25, 

2021; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades 

and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China; No Shipment Inquiry for Wuhan Wanbang 

Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. during the period 

11/01/2019 through 10/31/2020,’’ dated May 25, 

2021. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Notification of Receipt of 

U.S. Entry Documents,’’ dated April 1, 2021 at 

Attachment 1; see also Commerce’s Letter placing 

entry documentation on the record, dated June 25, 

2021. 

9See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 6–7. 

10See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 7. 

11See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.1

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: July 21, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–16433 Filed 7–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–900] 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

certain producers and/or exporters 

made sales of diamond sawblades and 

parts thereof (diamond sawblades) at 

less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR) November 1, 

2019, through October 31, 2020. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results of 

review. 

DATES: Applicable August 2, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Allison Hollander, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2805. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 4, 2009, we published 

in the Federal Register an antidumping 

duty order on diamond sawblades from 

the Peoples’ Republic of China (China).1

On November 3, 2020, we published in 

the Federal Register a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the Order.2 On January 6, 

2021, based on timely requests for an 

administrative review, Commerce 

initiated the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on diamond 

sawblades.3 The administrative review 

covers 53 companies, which is inclusive 

of the two mandatory respondents, 

Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity (Jiangsu 

Fengtai) and Zhejiang Wanli Tool Group 

Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Wanli).4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this Order 

are diamond sawblades. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.5

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Six companies that received a 

separate rate in previous segments of the 

proceeding and are subject to this 

review reported that they did not have 

any exports of subject merchandise 

during the POR.6 To date, we have 

found no evidence calling into question 

the no-shipment claims made by four of 

these companies; 7 therefore, we 

preliminarily find that these four 

companies had no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. For two of the six companies, 

because CBP data indicated entries 

during the POR, we requested entry 

documentation from CBP.8 Based on 

information on the record, we 

preliminarily find that Husqvarna 

(Hebei) Co., Ltd. (Husqvarna) had 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR. Therefore, because it did not 

file a separate rate application or 

separate rate certification (SRC), we are 

preliminarily considering Husqvarna to 

be part of the China-wide entity. We 

additionally find, based on information 

on the record, that Weihai Xiangguang 

Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd. (Weihai 

Xiangguang) did not have entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

Therefore, we preliminarily find that 

Weihai Xiangguang had no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR. For additional 

information regarding these preliminary 

determinations, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Separate Rates 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that one respondent is eligible to receive 

a separate rate in this review.9

Separate Rates for Eligible NonSelected Respondents 

Consistent with our practice, because 

we preliminarily denied the separate 

rate eligibility for the two respondents 

selected for individual examination, 

Jiangsu Fengtai and Zhejiang Wanli, and 

treated them as part of the China-wide 

entity, we preliminarily applied to the 

non-selected respondent the separate 

rate assigned to eligible respondents in 

the last completed administrative 

review, which is 0.00 percent.10

China-Wide Entity 

Under Commerce’s policy regarding 

the conditional review of the Chinawide entity,11 the China-wide entity 

will not be under review unless a party 

specifically requests, or Commerce selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices 41447 

12See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8, 

2015). 

13See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 

1329, 1331–32 (January 11, 2018) (‘‘All firms listed 

below that wish to qualify for separate rate status 

in the administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as appropriate, either a 

separate rate application or certification, as 

described below.’’). See Appendix II for the list of 

companies that are subject to this administrative 

review that are considered to be part of the Chinawide entity. 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

16See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

17See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2) and 19 CFR 

351.303 (for general filing requirements). 

18See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

19See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

20See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011). 

no party requested a review of the 

China-wide entity in this review, the 

entity is not under review, and the 

entity’s rate (i.e., 82.05 percent) is not 

subject to change.12 Aside from the noshipment and separate rate companies 

discussed above, Commerce considers 

all other companies for which a review 

was requested (which did not file a 

separate rate application) listed in 

Appendix II to this notice, to be part of 

the China-wide entity.13 Additionally, 

as discussed above, because we denied 

separate rate eligibility for Jiangsu 

Fengtai and Zhejiang Wanli, these two 

companies are also part of the Chinawide entity. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is made available 

to the public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov, and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room B8024 of the main Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be found at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. 

Preliminary Results of the 

Administrative Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following weighted-average 

dumping margin exists for the 

administrative review covering the 

period November 1, 2019, through 

October 31, 2020: 

Exporters: Separate rate 

applicable to the following 

non-selected companies 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology 

Co., Ltd ................................... 0.00 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce discloses to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with the 

preliminary results of a review within 

five days of any public announcement 

or, if there is no public announcement, 

within five days of the date of 

publication of the notice of preliminary 

results in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

However, because Commerce 

preliminarily denied the separate rate 

eligibility for the two respondents 

selected for individual examination and 

treated them as part of the China-wide 

entity, there are no calculations to 

disclose. 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.14 Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed no later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.15 Commerce has modified certain 

of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information until further 

notice.16 Parties who submit case briefs 

or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.17

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically 

using ACCESS. Requests should 

contain: (1) The party’s name, address, 

and telephone number; (2) the number 

of participants; and (3) a list of issues to 

be discussed. Issues raised in the 

hearing will be limited to those raised 

in the respective case briefs. If a request 

for a hearing is made, Commerce 

intends to hold the hearing at a time and 

date to be determined. An electronically 

filed document must be received 

successfully in its entirety by ACCESS 

by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice.18

Unless the deadline is extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of these reviews, including the 

results of its analysis of the issues raised 

in any written briefs, no later than 120 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results, 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.19 If the preliminary results are 

unchanged for the final results, we will 

instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment rate of 82.05 percent to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR which were exported by the 

companies listed in Appendix II of this 

notice and an ad valorem assessment 

rate of 0.00 percent to all entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

which were exported by the nonselected respondent eligible for a 

separate rate, listed above, Xiamen ZL. 

If Commerce determines that an 

exporter under review had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries that entered 

under that exporter’s case number (i.e., 

at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated 

at the China-wide rate.20

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for shipments of the subject 

merchandise from China entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) 

of the Act: (1) For the subject 

merchandise exported by the company 

listed above that has a separate rate, the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
41448 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices 

*Selected as mandatory respondents, these 

companies were found to be part of the China-wide 

entity in the instant review. 

1See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from Mexico: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 7067 (January 26, 2021) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2 Id. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

the Final Results of the 2018–2019 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated April 8, 2021. 

cash deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, then zero cash 

deposit will be required); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that received a separate rate 

in a prior segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for 

all Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter that 

supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during these 

PORs. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

the preliminary results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B), 

751(a)(3) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 26, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies that are subject to this 

administrative review that are considered to 

be part of the China-wide entity are: 

ASHINE Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd. 

Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd. 

Danyang Tongyu Tools Co., Ltd. 

Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Diamond Tools Technology (Thailand) Co., 

Ltd. 

Fujian Quanzhou Aotu Precise Machine Co., 

Ltd. 

Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading 

Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Hebei XMF Tools Group Co., Ltd. 

Henan Huanghe Whirlwind Co., Ltd. 

Henan Huanghe Whirlwind International Co., 

Ltd. 

Hong Kong Hao Xin International Group 

Limited 

Hubei Changjiang Precision Engineering 

Materials Technology Co., Ltd. 

Hubei Sheng Bai Rui Diamond Tools Co., 

Ltd. 

Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd. 

Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity *

Jiangsu Huachang Diamond Tools 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation 

Jiangsu Yaofeng Tools Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd. 

Orient Gain International Limited 

Pantos Logistics (HK) Company Limited 

Protec Tools Co., Ltd. 

Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., 

Ltd. 

Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Quanzhou Sunny Superhard Tools Co., Ltd. 

Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd. 

Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd. 

Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co. Ltd. 

Shanghai Vinon Tools Industrial Co. 

Sino Tools Co., Ltd. 

Wuhan Baiyi Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Wuhan Sadia Trading Co., Ltd. 

Wuhan ZhaoHua Technology Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Wanli Tool Group Co., Ltd. *

ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd. 

ZL Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2021–16418 Filed 7–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–847] 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 

Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that the producers/ 

exporters subject to this administrative 

review did not make sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR) 

September 1, 2018, through August 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable August 2, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger or David Crespo, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–3693, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This review covers 11 producers/ 

exporters of the subject merchandise. 

Commerce selected two companies, 

Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero) 

and Productos Laminados de Monterrey 

S.A. de C.V. (Prolamsa) (collectively, the 

mandatory respondents), for individual 

examination. The producers/exporters 

not selected for individual examination 

are listed in Appendix II. 

On January 26, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results.2 On March 8, 

2021, Nucor Tubular Products Inc. (i.e., 

the domestic interested party) and 

Maquilacero filed case briefs. On March 

17, 2021, the domestic interested party, 

Maquilacero, and Prolamsa filed 

rebuttal briefs. On April 8, 2021, we 

postponed the final results until July 23, 

2021.3 For a description of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES