alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research: University Park, PA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Software
                        Integrated Farming Systems Project
                                    Integrated Farm System Model
                                    Dairy Gas Emissions Model
                                    Beef Gas Emissions Model
                                    Projected Future Climate Data for IFSMSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area University Park, Pennsylvania Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research People & Locations







Todd K Strohecker
                        Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research

                        




                        
                        Hydrologic Technician
                        Phone: (570) 425-2388
                        
                        
                        Fax: (570) 425-2538(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 94 Filed: 06/14/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1171
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 94 Filed: 06/14/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:1172
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 94 Filed: 06/14/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:1173
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 94 Filed: 06/14/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:1174
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 94 Filed: 06/14/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:1175
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 84 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 6, 1997.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Blumenauer of Oregon, to 
rank directly below Mr. Cummings of Maryland.
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. Kucinich of Ohio.
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. McDermott of Washington.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

h0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144605

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144605

COA: 307062

Saginaw CC: 10

- 034437 FC

FERNANDO JESUS VILLAREAL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JERRY LILLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND

D/B/A WESTAR INDUSTRIES,

Appellant,

v.

CHRIS PHAM, ATTORNEY

- IN

- FACT

FOR ALEX PHAM,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00135

- CV

Appeal from

352nd District Court

of Tarrant Co unty, Texas

(TC # 352

- 280346

- 15 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, Jerry Lilly, Individually and d/b/a

Westar Industries

, ha s failed to file his brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

T he Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that his brief was past due and no motion for

extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended to dis miss

the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and showed

grounds for continuing the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant has not filed his

brief or an extension motion, and he has not filed any response to t he inquiry. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).- 2

-

October 2 7 , 2016

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Paul Gothard, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Medicsight, Inc;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|                     | By:                       | /s/ PAUL A.  GOTHARD |
|---------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|
|                | Paul Gothard              |
|                | *Chief Financial Officer* |
| March 30, 2005 |                      |

 

E-9

----
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
          I, Brent W. Christensen, certify that:
          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meade InstrumentsCorp.;
          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting   Date: October 15, 2004 By:  /s/ Brent W. Christensen   Senior VicePresident - Finance and CFO
Exhibit  32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted), James W. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of
SpaceDev,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies  that,  to the best of his
knowledge:

The  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2004, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and the information
contained  in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of this 9th
day  of  August  2004.


By:     /s/  James  W.  Benson
----------------------------------
          James  W.  Benson
         Chief  Executive  Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

December 8, 2023

SC-2023-0790

Ex parte Michael Shane Fletcher. PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: 

Michael Shane Fletcher v. State of Alabama) (Mobile Circuit Court: CC19-436; Criminal Appeals: CR-2022-0807).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on December 8, 2023:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Cook, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, 

Sellers, and Stewart, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
Case: 1:02-cv-00171 Document #: 7 Filed: 06/04/02 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:44
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1625
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 2 of 20 PageID #:1626
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 3 of 20 PageID #:1627
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 4 of 20 PageID #:1628
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 5 of 20 PageID #:1629
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 6 of 20 PageID #:1630
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 7 of 20 PageID #:1631
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 8 of 20 PageID #:1632
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 9 of 20 PageID #:1633
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 10 of 20 PageID #:1634
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 11 of 20 PageID #:1635
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 12 of 20 PageID #:1636
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 13 of 20 PageID #:1637
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 14 of 20 PageID #:1638
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 15 of 20 PageID #:1639
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 16 of 20 PageID #:1640
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 17 of 20 PageID #:1641
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 18 of 20 PageID #:1642
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 19 of 20 PageID #:1643
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 169 Filed: 07/08/03 Page 20 of 20 PageID #:1644
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00054-CV

Richard Stubbs

v.

The City of Weslaco, and Veronica Ramirez, 

in her official capacity as Weslaco Civil Service Director

On Appeal from the

92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-0435-13-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed in part and the 

cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court

REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its 

opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 8, 2015
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code), each of the undersigned officers of Force Protection, Inc., aNevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

The QuarterlyReport for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006 |   | /s/ Gordon McGilton            |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                    |   | Gordon McGilton                |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer        |
|                    |   |                           |
| Date: November 14, 2006 |   | /s/ R. Scott Ervin             |
|                    |   | R. Scott Ervin                 |
|                    |   | Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |   |                           |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1175 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1175

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 1998

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Citizen 
              Advisory Commission for 10 additional years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL 
              RECREATION AREA CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION.

    Section 5 of Public Law 101-573 (16 U.S.C. 460o note) is amended by 
striking ``10'' and inserting ``20''.

            Passed the Senate October 7 (legislative day, October 2), 
      1998.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### In the Matter of Victoria K. and Others, Alleged to be Abandoned Children. Delaware County Department of Social Services, Appellant; Joseph K., Respondent.

—Harvey, J.

Appeal from four orders of the Family Court of Delaware County (Estes, J.), entered February 15, 1985, which dismissed petitioner’s applications, in proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate Victoria, Vincent, Theresa and Vanessa K. abandoned children and terminate respondent’s parental rights.

In May 1984, petitioner commenced these proceedings against respondent seeking orders determining his four children to be abandoned and committing the guardianship and custody of the children to petitioner. Although the children’s mother was alive, petitioner sought commitment of the children based only upon allegations that respondent abandoned the children. Family Court dismissed the petitions without prejudice on the ground that, even if it determined that the children had been abandoned by respondent, the court could not commit their custody and guardianship to petitioner in the absence of consent of their mother or a termination of her parental rights. This appeal ensued.

We affirm. Social Services Law § 384-b was enacted to facilitate the freeing of children for adoption (Social Services Law § 384-b [1] [b]; Memorandum of the Temporary State Commission on Child Welfare, 1976 NY Legis Ann, at 239). Once guardianship and custody are in an authorized agency, the agency can consent to adoption (Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [Q; [2] [c]). However, guardianship and custody will be committed to the agency only upon the statutory grounds set forth in Social Services Law § 384-b (4). In order to proceed on the theory of abandonment, the agency must establish that the "parent or parents, whose consent to the adoption of the child would otherwise be required in accordance with section *969one hundred eleven of the domestic relations law, abandoned such child for the period of six months” (Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]). Since Domestic Relations Law § 111 requires, except under limited circumstances, the consent of the mother, a finding of abandonment against respondent only would not free the children for adoption. Therefore, a proceeding under Social Services Law § 384-b (4) (b) to commit guardianship and custody of a child to an authorized agency based on abandonment must be maintained against both parents unless one parent is dead or has otherwise had their parental rights terminated.

Orders affirmed, without costs. Main, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.