alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Steven D. Shackelford, the Chief Financial Officer of Trustreet
Properties,  Inc. (the "Company"), has executed this certification in connection
with the filing with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the Company's
Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2005  (the
"Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATED this 9th day of May 2005.



                                         /s/ Steven D. Shackelford
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         Steven D. Shackelford
                                         Chief Financial Officer


                                         A  signed   original  of  this  written
                                         statement  required  by Section 906 has
                                         been  provided  to the Company and will
                                         be   retained   by  the   Company   and
                                         furnished   to   the   Securities   and
                                         Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
                                         request.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 153 (Thursday, August 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44345-44346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17247]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2116]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 158 (Expansion of Service 
Area); Under Alternative Site Framework; Vicksburg/Jackson, Mississippi

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Board to grant to qualified 
corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or 
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    Whereas, the Greater Mississippi Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee 
of Foreign-Trade Zone 158, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ 
Docket B-18-2021, docketed March 9, 2021) for authority to expand the 
service area of the zone to include Grenada and Panola Counties, 
Mississippi, as described in the application, adjacent to the Memphis 
(Tennessee) Customs and Border Protection port of entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (86 FR 14307, March 15, 2021) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 158 to expand the service area 
under the ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board's standard 
2,000-acre activation limit for the zone.


[[Page 44346]]


    Dated: August 6, 2021.
Christian B. Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-17247 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1000 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1000

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States courthouse at 500 State Avenue in Kansas 
    City, Kansas, as the ``Robert J. Dole United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT J. DOLE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse at 500 State Avenue in Kansas City, 
Kansas, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert J. Dole United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert J. Dole 
United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Goswick *v.*Alpharetta Bank.

April 14, 1915.

Rehearing denied April 23, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Patterson. Milton superior court. April 30, 1914.

*G. F. Gober*and *G. B. Walker,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. Z. Foster*and *J. P. Brooke,*contra.

Hill, J.

1. Where a bill of exchange is drawn on a bank, payable to the order of a third person, and the payee indorses the draft in blank and delivers it to a second bank to be forwarded for collection, without any written agreement as to the disposition of the proceeds, evidence is admissible to show a parol agreement between the payee and the collecting bank, made at the time of the delivery of the draft for collection, to the effect that the proceeds of the draft should be credited by the bank on a debt of another person, and that it should not go on deposit to the credit of the payee.

(ct) Many of the grounds of the motion for a new trial included confused statements showing controversies and colloquies between the court and counsel on the subject of the admissibility of evidence; but in so far as any of them have been sufficient to raise any question for decision, in view of the ruling above announced, they show no error in the rulings of the court.

2. When considered in connection with other portions of the charge, the excerpts complained of afford no ground for a reversal.

3. The ground of the motion for a new trial based on alleged newly discovered evidence was entirely without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathaniel Gabbidon, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 899]

McCarthy, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered September 21, 2010, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a five-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted robbery in the second degree in connection with his involvement in the beating and robbery of a man in the City of Albany. By the terms of the plea agreement, defendant was offered a sentence of 4V2 years in prison and the minimum period of postrelease supervision. The plea agreement generally referenced defendant’s “cooperation,” but did not specify what was required in that regard. At sentenc*1236ing, the People informed County Court that defendant had violated the plea agreement by failing to testify against his co-defendant. The court, finding that defendant had also lied to the Probation Department, imposed an enhanced sentence of 6V2 years in prison and three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, arguing, among other things, that the court improperly enhanced his sentence without giving him the opportunity to withdraw his plea.

We agree that County Court erred. Nowhere in this record did the court inform defendant that it could impose a greater sentence if defendant did not testify against his codefendant or if he lied to the Probation Department. Under these circumstances, the court could not impose an enhanced sentence without first giving defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea, which the court failed to do *(see People v Becker,*80 AD3d 795, 796-797 [2011]; *People v Dunton,*10 AD3d 808, 808-809 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 830 [2005]). Although the record before us indicates that defendant failed to preserve this issue by moving to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, we exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction, modify the judgment by vacating the sentence and remit the matter for County Court to either impose the agreed-upon sentence or allow defendant to withdraw his plea *(see People v Armstead, 52*AD3d 966, 967 [2008]; *People v Hastings,*24 AD3d 954, 955 [2005]). In view of this disposition, defendant’s remaining argument is academic.

Her cure, J.P., Rose, Kavanagh and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the sentence imposed; matter remitted to the County Court of Albany County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision; and, as so modified, affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1292 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1292

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
Disapproving the cancellations transmitted by the President on October 
                 6, 1997, regarding Public Law 105-45.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 
disapproves of cancellations 97-4, 97-5, 97-6, 97-7, 97-8, 97-9, 97-10, 
97-11, 97-12, 97-13, 97-14, 97-15, 97-16, 97-17, 97-18, 97-19, 97-20, 
97-21, 97-22, 97-23, 97-24, 97-25, 97-26, 97-27, 97-28, 97-29, 97-30, 
97-32, 97-33, 97-34, 97-35, 97-36, 97-37, 97-38, 97-39, and 97-40, as 
transmitted by the President in a special message on October 6, 1997, 
regarding Public Law 105-45.

            Passed the Senate October 30, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1292

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

Disapproving the cancellations transmitted by the President on October 
                 6, 1997, regarding Public Law 105-45.
```
#### In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent, v Edwardo Bonilla, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 (c) to permanently stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), dated October 29, 1984, which granted the petition.

Order and judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and application denied.

On February 16, 1982, appellant Edwardo Bonilla, while operating his vehicle, was involved in an accident with a vehicle operated by Mayline Copper and owned by Curtis Mondesir. On January 9, 1984, petitioner insurance company received a demand for arbitration based upon the uninsured motorist indorsement on an automobile liability policy written by it and issued to appellant. By notice of petition and petition dated February 21, 1984, petitioner moved pursuant to CPLR 7503 (c) to stay the arbitration upon the grounds that appellant’s policy had been canceled on September 16, 1981 and the Mondesir vehicle was covered by insurance.

*572Trial Term ruled that there was valid insurance coverage on the Mondesir vehicle and stayed arbitration as against petitioner.

We reverse. CPLR 7503 (c) requires that a party served with a demand for arbitration make application to stay such arbitration within 20 days after service of the demand or be time barred. The exception set forth in *Matter of Matarasso (Continental Cas. Co.)*(56 NY2d 264) does not pertain to the situation before us, as there, no agreement to arbitrate was ever entered into by the parties. Here, the issues are whether or not the arbitration clause was still in effect as of the accident date, that is, had petitioner validly canceled prior to the accident a preexisting policy which contained an agreement to arbitrate *(see, Matter of Nassau Ins. Co. [Clemente],*100 AD2d 969; *Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. [Richards],*99 AD2d 785), and whether the Mondesir vehicle was covered by insurance.

Accordingly, petitioner’s failure to timely move for a stay in response to the demand for arbitration mandates dismissal of this proceeding. Lazer, J. P., Rubin, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 24

- 0102

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL CHRISTIAN ECHEVERRIA

,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S

OPENING BRIEF

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his

opening brief, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of

time to and including August 30 , 2024 within which to file his opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 29 2024

07/29/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0102
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EGL, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:

March 16, 2006

By:

/s/  James R. Crane

James R. Crane

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)



Date:

March 16, 2006

By:

/s/  Janice Kerti



Janice Kerti

Chief Accounting Officer

(principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EGL, Inc. and will be retained by EGL, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit: El Reno, OK
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area El Reno, Oklahoma Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit People & Locations







John Jacob Kastl
                        Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker
                        Phone: (405) 262-5291
                        
                        
                        Fax: (405) 262-0450(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,561,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,358,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                    97,275
<INVENTORY>                                    943,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,917,815
<PP&E>                                       2,509,694
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,276,056
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,980,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,197,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         29
<COMMON>                                       280,716
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,392,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,980,097
<SALES>                                      5,646,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,646,031
<CGS>                                        3,517,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,517,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,447,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (8,162)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,078,984)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,078,984)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,078,984)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 154 (Friday, August 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 44752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection 
eComments Requested; Extension of a Currently Approved Collection; 
Correction

AGENCY: Office of Violence Against Women, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Violence Against Women, Department of Justice, 
submitted two notices for publication in the Federal Register on July 
30, 2021 soliciting comments to an information collection request to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in 
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The document 
contained incorrect information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Written comments and/or suggestion 
regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated 
public burden and associated response time, should be directed to Cathy 
Poston, Office on Violence Against Women, at 202-514-5430 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#783b190c101d0a11161d5608170b0c1716380d0b1c1712561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2b193869a97809b9c97dc829d81869d9cb28781969d98dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Corrections: In the Federal Register of July 
30, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-16313, on page 41093, in the second column, 
correct the Action caption to read: 30-Day notice and correct the Dates 
caption to read: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 30 
days until August 30, 2021.
    In the Federal Register of July 30, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-16312, on 
page 41094, in the third column, correct the Action caption to read: 
30-Day notice and correct the Dates caption to read: Comments are 
encouraged and will be accepted for 30 days until August 30, 2021.

    Dated: August 9, 2021.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2021-17297 Filed 8-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-FX-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23.1





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT





The Board of Directors and Shareholders


Pericom Semiconductor Corporation:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-30412 on Form S-3, and Nos. 333-39055, 333-43934, 333-51229
and 333-58522 on Form S-8 of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation of our reports dated July 22, 2002 (September 11, 2002 as to Note 15) included and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation for
the year ended June 30, 2002.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





San Jose, California


September 27, 2002