alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          28,983
<SECURITIES>                                    50,350
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,849
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,440
<PP&E>                                          19,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,440
<BONDS>                                            680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           520
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,164
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,944
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,056)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,038
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,358
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                        U.S. RESTAURANT PROPERTIES, INC.
   RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                     ------------------------
                                                      3/31/00        3/31/99
                                                     ---------      ---------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>
Net Income                                             $  409         $2,510

Fixed Charges:
  Interest Expense                                      7,698          6,739
  Capitalized Interest                                    272            305
  Preferred Dividend Requirements                       1,776          1,776
                                                       ------         ------
Total Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends       9,746          8,820

Less Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements              1,776          1,776

                                                       ------         ------
Earnings                                               $8,379         $9,554
                                                       ======         ======

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(1)                    1.05x          1.36x
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
  and Preferred Stock Dividends(1)                       0.86x          1.08x
</TABLE>


(1)  During the three months ended March 31, 2000 and March 31, 1999, the
     Company recorded a non-cash charge of ($1,031) and $2,550, respectively
     relating to contingent OP units accrued according to the 1997 termination
     of the management contract. Excluding the effects of this non-cash charge,
     the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and the ratio of earnings to
     combined fixed charges and preferred stock would have been 0.92x and 0.75x,
     respectively for three months ended March 31, 2000, and 1.72x and 1.37x,
     respectively for the three months ended March 31, 1999.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-878]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Epic Pharma, LLC. has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before September 13, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before September 13, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on July 7, 2021, Epic Pharma, LLC., 22715 North Conduit Avenue, Laurelton, New York 11413, applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleMethadone
9250
II
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for research and development purposes. Approval of permit applications will occur only when the registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished dosage forms for commercial sale. Brian S. Besser, Acting Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-17182 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 03-C-3904

)

KEVIN TRUDEAU, ) Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

Defendant. )

NOTICE OF MOTION

TO: Michael Mora David O’Toole

Jonathan Cohen Federal Trade Commission

Amanda Kostner 55 West Monroe St., Suite 1825

Federal Trade Commission Chicago, IL 60603

601 New Jersey Ave, NW Suite 2215

Washington, DC 20001

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned will appear before the Honorable 

Robert W. Gettleman on Friday July 26, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 1703 in the Federal 

Office Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, or before any judge sitting in 

his stead, and present DEFENDANT KEVIN TRUDEAU’S MOTION FOR LEAVE 

INSTANTER TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE FTC’S POST-HEARING BRIEF, a 

copy of which has been served upon you by the Court’s electronic filing system.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Kimball R. Anderson__

Kimball R. Anderson

Thomas L. Kirsch, II

Katherine E. Rohlf

Winston & Strawn LLP

35 West Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60601

Phone: 312-558-5600

Facsimile: 312-558-5700

Attorneys for Defendant Kevin 

Trudeau
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Kimball R. Anderson, an attorney, hereby certify that on July 23, 2013 I caused to be 

served true copies of the above Notice of Motion by filing such document through the Court’s 

Electronic Case Filing System, which will send notification of such filing to:

Michael Mora

Jonathan Cohen

Amanda Kostner

Federal Trade Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue NW, Suite 2215

Washington, DC 20001

David O’Toole

Federal Trade Commission

55 West Monroe Street, Suite 1825

Chicago, IL 60603

____/s/ Kimball R. Anderson__________
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:130
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 2 of 19 PageID #:131
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 3 of 19 PageID #:132
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 4 of 19 PageID #:133
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 5 of 19 PageID #:134
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 6 of 19 PageID #:135
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 7 of 19 PageID #:136
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 8 of 19 PageID #:137
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 9 of 19 PageID #:138
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 10 of 19 PageID #:139
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 11 of 19 PageID #:140
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 12 of 19 PageID #:141
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 13 of 19 PageID #:142
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 14 of 19 PageID #:143
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 15 of 19 PageID #:144
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 16 of 19 PageID #:145
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 17 of 19 PageID #:146
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 18 of 19 PageID #:147
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/15/04 Page 19 of 19 PageID #:148
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus: Riverside, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Riverside, California National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus People & Locations







Patricia  Moore
                        National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant
                        Phone: (951) 827-6984
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-2687

___________________________

David Anthony Stebbins

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Rita F. Stebbins and David D. Stebbins

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison

____________

 Submitted: November 6, 2013

Filed: November 12, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner David A. Stebbins appeals from the judgment of the District Court

1

dismissing his pro se action. Upon review of the record, we conclude that we lack

The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Western District of Arkansas.
jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. See Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923

(8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that jurisdictional issues “will be raised sua sponte”). 

Following the dismissal of his complaint, Stebbins filed what was in effect a timely

motion for postjudgment relief under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. See Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney, 489 U.S. 169, 174 (1989) (“[A]

postjudgment motion will be considered a Rule 59(e) motion where it involves

‘reconsideration of matters properly encompassed in a decision on the merits.’”

(citation to quoted case omitted)). That motion remains pending, and until the

District Court rules on it, Stebbins’s notice of appeal will lie dormant. See Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(4)(A) (noting that if a party timely files a Rule 59 motion for a new trial

or to alter or amend the judgment, the time to file the appeal runs from the entry of

the order disposing of such motion); United States v. Duke, 50 F.3d 571, 575 (8th

Cir.); cert. denied, 516 U.S. 885 (1995).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 4.4.1


 


 


Additional Agreement No1


to the LOAN AGREEMENT


 


On 30 June 2021


 


Arras Minerals Corp., company established
in accordance with the the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, entity No. BC1287773, located at: Suite 1610, 777
Dunsmuir Street, Vancouver, Canada, V7Y 1K4, represented by CFO Mr. Christopher Richards, acting on basis of the Articles,
hereinafter referred to as the “Creditor”, on one part, and Ekidos Minerals LLP, a limited liability
partnership established in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Kazakhstan, BIN 191040035309, located at: Republic of
Kazakhstan, Almaty, 050000, Panfilov Street 158, Office 1, Almaty, represented by Director, Mrs. Irma Nuss, acting on the basis of
the Charter, hereinafter referred to as the “Debtor”, on the other part, hereinafter collectively referred to as
the “Parties” and individually as “Party”, have concluded this Additional Agreement No1 to the Loan Agreement
No.2 dated 21 December 2020 (hereinafter – the “Agreement”) as follows:


 


1. Clause 3.1 of Section 3 of the Agreement to revised
as follows:


 


“The repayment of the amount of the Loan specified in this Agreement
shall be made by the Debtor on or before 30 November 2021”.


 


2. In all other matters that are not regulated by
the terms of this Additional Agreement #1, the Parties are guided by the provisions of the Agreement.


 





 


SIGNATURES AND REQUISITES OF THE PARTIES:


 


On behalf of the Creditor


Arras Minerals Corp.


 


/s/ Christopher Richards       


Christopher Richards


 





 


On behalf of the Debtor


Ekidos Minerals LLP


 


 


/s/ Irma Nuss        


Irma Nuss


Director
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration [Docket Nos. FDA-2010-N-0190; FDA-2012-N-0197; FDA-2014-N-1414; and FDA-2014-N-0913]
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of information collections that have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 
                        ( print page 43666)
                        20852, 301-796-7726, 
                        *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of FDA information collections recently approved by OMB under section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements for the information collections are available on the internet at 
                    *https://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*
                     An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Table 1—List of Information Collections Approved by OMB
Title of collection
OMB control number
Date approval expiresInfant Formula Requirements
0910-0256
5/31/2024Shortages Data Collection
0910-0491
6/30/2024Guidance on Labeling for Natural Rubber Latex Condoms
0910-0633
6/30/2024Section 513(g) Requests for Information
0910-0705
6/30/2024
 Dated: August 5, 2021. Lauren K. Roth, Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.


[FR Doc. 2021-17045 Filed 8-9-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted August 15, 2013*

Decided August 16, 2013

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 13-1887

MARTINS OCHOLI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 12-C-1069

Rudolph T. Randa, Judge.

Order

Martins Ocholi sued his employer, contending that it violated Title VII of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964. The district court dismissed the suit as untimely. Title VII allows 90 

days after the charging party receives notice of his right to sue. 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e–

5(f)(1), 2000e–16(c). Ocholi filed his suit 108 days after the EEOC mailed its right-to-sue 

letter, and the district court observed that Ocholi has not contended that delivery took 

18 days or longer. Indeed, Ocholi never told the district court when he had received the 

letter.

 

* After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).
No. 13-1887 Page 2

Ocholi’s appellate briefs do not address the ground on which the district court decided the case. Instead he asserts that Wal-Mart violated Title VII. This is not so much a 

justification for extending the time to sue (Ocholi has never argued for tolling or estoppel) as it is a proposal that the judiciary ignore the statute. We grant leeway to plaintiffs 

who represent themselves, as Ocholi has done, and do our best to understand inartfully 

phrased contentions, but statutes must be enforced whether or not a litigant has a lawyer. See McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993). Because Ocholi does not contend that the district court misunderstood or misapplied the time limit in Title VII, this 

appeal is dismissed for lack of an adequate brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A).
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1183

To repeal the provision crediting increased excise taxes on certain tobacco

products against payments made pursuant to the tobacco industry settlement legislation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 17, 1997

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BUMPERS, Mr.

DEWINE, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. REED, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. WELLSTONE, and Mr.

WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To repeal the provision crediting increased excise taxes on

certain tobacco products against payments made pursuant to the tobacco industry settlement legislation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secret Tobacco Give5 away Repeal Act’’.
2

•S 1183

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TOBACCO INDUSTRY SETTLEMENT

2 CREDIT.

3 Subsection (k) of section 9302 of the Balanced Budg4 et Act of 1997, as added by section 1604(f)(3) of the Tax5 payer Relief Act of 1997, is repealed.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of IBSG International, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Geoffrey
Birch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                                       
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|By                |  | /s/ Geoffrey Birch                    
|                  |  | Geoffrey Birch Chief Financial
Officer
|                 
|November 14, 2008
#### ROCKWOOD v. NEW YORK CONTRACTING CO., NEW HAVEN IMPROVEMENTS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by Martin D. Rockwood, as administrator, etc., against the New York Contracting Company, New Haven Improvements.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.