alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Allan Freedman, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), rendered December 15, 1977, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,036,104                 780,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  28,630
<RECEIVABLES>                              224,570,140              80,684,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                10,661,339               4,710,829
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                      13,624,697               5,391,376
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,366,108               2,547,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             237,353,605              78,996,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                    211,923,199              62,923,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,104                  10,813
<COMMON>                                        69,754                  38,852
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,722,723              12,879,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               237,353,605              78,996,012
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            84,334,162              23,280,731
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            53,691,003              15,777,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            11,937,679               4,046,460
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,570,670               5,037,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                134,810             (1,580,504)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   490,000               (496,487)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (355,190)             (1,084,017)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (355,190)             (1,084,017)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)                  (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)                  (0.35)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           867,750
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    629,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,142,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,683,668
<PP&E>                                         2,853,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (118,423)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,425,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            121,320
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           6,010
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,049,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,555,634
<SALES>                                          422,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 422,818
<CGS>                                            177,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    177,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 144,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (13,279)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  127,245
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              127,245
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     127,245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .02
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 41972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 19, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. Allan C. Minnerath, individually, and as trustee of the Scott A. 
Minnerath Sauk Centre Trust under the James J. Minnerath Revocable 
Trust under agreement dated November 8, 2012, as amended; the Rachel K. 
Minnerath Sauk Centre Trust under the James J. Minnerath Revocable 
Trust under agreement dated November 8, 2012, as amended; and the Ryan 
J. Minnerath Sauk Centre Trust under the James J. Minnerath Revocable 
Trust under agreement dated November 8, 2012, as amended, and John A. 
Minnerath, as co-trustee of all trusts and all of Alexandria, 
Minnesota; and Mark W. Greiner, as co-trustee of all trusts, Tonka Bay, 
Minnesota; to retain additional voting shares of Sauk Centre Financial 
Services, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of 
Minnesota National Bank, both of Sauk Centre, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 21, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-16633 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### In the Matter of the Adoption of Collin. Alicia P., Appellant; Robin C. et al., Respondents.

[944 NYS2d 712]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Fresent— Centra, J.E, Fahey, Peradotto and Martoche, JJ.
#### RANSOM, Respondent, v. WATTS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 7, 1896.)

Action by John P. M. Ransom against George Watts.

No opiniop. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### In the Matter of Alethea B., a Child Alleged to be Abused.

—Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for a hearing and further proceedings not inconsistent with the following memorandum: Family Court erred in sentencing appellant for failing to comply with the terms and conditions of a temporary order of protection (Family Ct Act § 1072 [b]). Appellant was not present nor advised of his right to be heard and to present witnesses *(see, Matter of Ryan v Ryan,*42 AD2d 733). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Killeen, J.—violation of order of protection.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,876
<INVENTORY>                                     34,259
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,190
<PP&E>                                          29,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,226
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,938
<SALES>                                         26,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,029
<CGS>                                            3,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,444
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derek Sharlow, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), rendered July 20, 1983, convicting him of attempted robbery *604in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him as a second violent felony offender to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 years and 9 months to 5 Vi years.

Judgment affirmed.

The claims raised by defendant as to the legal sufficiency of the plea allocution are unpreserved for review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). In any event, the plea allocution was satisfactory as all the elements of attempted robbery in the second degree were established. Furthermore, defendant failed to present substantial evidence to overcome the presumption of the validity and regularity of his previous violent felony conviction which was entered upon his guilty plea, and, therefore, he was properly sentenced as a second violent felony offender *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9).

Defendant also contends that the promised sentence of *2Vz*to 5 years was not imposed and that he was not given an opportunity to withdraw his plea. Defendant was fully advised that the promised sentence would be enhanced if he failed to appear on "April 15th or any date that may be fixed thereafter”. Defendant failed to appear on the adjourned date, and a bench warrant was issued on June 3. His proffered explanation at sentencing in July was an unsubstantiated claim of amnesia. Under the circumstances, we do not find the sentence imposed either a violation of the plea agreement or excessive *(cf. People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816; *People v Davis,*106 AD2d 657, 658). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Fiber, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



Board of Directors and Shareholders
Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc.

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-28299 and File No.
333-52323)  of  our  report  dated  January  27,  2000,  on  our  audit  of  the
consolidated  financial  statements for the year ended December 31, 1999,  which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

                                    VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP


                                    /s/ Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP
                                    --------------------------------------------

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 15, 2000
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of
Logitech International S.A. (the Company) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code.

Gerald P. Quindlen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark J. Hawkins, the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each certify that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 3, 2009

|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/ Gerald P. Quindlen                    
|Gerald P. Quindlen Chief Executive
Officer
|                                          
|/s/ Mark J. Hawkins                       
|Mark J. Hawkins Chief Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Force  Protection Corporation, a Colorado corporation
(the  "Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2004 (the "Form
10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

Dated:  November  15,  2004



/s/  Gale  Aguilar
--------------------
Gale  Aguilar,  Interim  Chief  Executive  Officer





Dated:  November  15,  2004


 /s/  Thomas  Thebes
 -----------------
Thomas  Thebes,   Chief  Financial  Officer
# Official Journal C 73/23 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 73 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4823 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 73

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4823 March 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 073/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 073/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 073/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3706 — ÖVAG/Investkredit) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 3 |
| 2005/C 073/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3695 — BT/Radianz) (1) | 4 |
| 2005/C 073/5 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 5 |
| 2005/C 073/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3658 — Orkla/Chips) (1) | 11 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 073/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 073/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

2

2005/C 073/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3706 — ÖVAG/Investkredit) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

3

2005/C 073/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3695 — BT/Radianz) (1)

4

2005/C 073/5

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

5

2005/C 073/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3658 — Orkla/Chips) (1)

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2019270EN.01004401.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/44

---

Action brought on 25 June 2019 — Turk Hava Yollari v EUIPO — Sky (skylife)

(Case T-382/19)

(2019/C 270/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Turk Hava Yollari AO (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sky Ltd (Isleworth, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark skylife — International registration designating the European Union No 898 322

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 April 2019 in Case R 880/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to declare valid the contested international trademark registration No. 898 322 for all the goods and services as registered in classes 39 and 41; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to declare valid the contested international trademark registration No. 898 322 for all the goods and services as registered in classes 39 and 41;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener, Sky Limited, to pay all the costs of the dispute before the General Court, including those relating to the procedure before the Fourth Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener, Sky Limited, to pay all the costs of the dispute before the General Court, including those relating to the procedure before the Fourth Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.01
 HARTFORD LIFE, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hartford Life, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions
contained in SEC Release 34-47986];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  /s/ Thomas M. Marra
 47