# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 30420

**consolidated with** No. 21

- 30487

**In re: In the Matter of the Complaint of American**  **Petroleum Tankers X LLC, As the Owner of the M/T**  **American Liberty, and Crowley Global Ship Management, Inc.,**  **As the Owner Pro Hac Vice of the M/T American Liberty, for Exoneration from or**  **Limitation of Liability**

**Americ an Petroleum Tankers X, L.L.C., As the Owner of**  **the M/T American Liberty; Crowley Global Ship Management, Incorporated, As the Owner Pro Hac Vice**  **of the M/T American Liberty,**

Petitioners

— Appellants **,**

versus

**American River Transportation Company, L.L.C.; Archer Daniels Midland Company, doing business as**  **ADM Grain Company; ADM International SARL; Lexington Insurance Company; XL Insurance America,**  **Incorporated; Crum &**  **Forster Specialty Insurance Company; Partner Reinsurance Europe SE; Endurance**  **Assurance Co rporation; Certain Underwriters at**  **Lloyd ’**  **s Syndicate 1183; Axis Reinsurance Company; Certain Underwriters at Lloyd**  **’ s Syndicate 2987; Allied**  **World Assurance Company, Limited; Clement Bell; Ryheme Knighton; Robert Sayles; Port of South**  United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 20, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-30420 Document: 00516327018 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/20/20222 **Louisiana; Associated Marine Equipment, L.L.C.;**  **Associated Terminals, L.L.C.; Scor Reinsurance Company; Ascot Underwriting Limited and Other**  **Underwriters; Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company; Marathon Petroleum Company,**  **L.P.; AIG Europe, Limited; Allianz Global Corpo rate ;**  **Specialty SE; Argo International Syndicate 1200; Axis Syndicate 2007; Barbican Syndicate 1955; Chaucer**  **Syndicate 1084; Liberty Syndicate 4472; Markel Syndicate 3000; MS Amlin Syndicate 2001; Skuld**  **Syndicate 1897; Tokio Marine Houston Casualty Compan**  **y; Through Transport Mutual Insurance Association, Limited,** 

Claimants

— Appellees **,**
**Brandon Woodford,**

Third Party Defendant

— Appellee

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana No. 2:19

- CV

- 10525 No. 2:19

- CV

- 10925

Before **Richman,** Chief Judge **,** and **Costa** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

O n the evening of May 16, 2019, the fully laden product tanker
AMERICAN LIBERTY (“Vessel”) left harbor in Garyville, Louisiana on the Lower Mississippi River. In the fast current, the bridge team lost control

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. Case: 21-30420 Document: 00516327018 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/20/2022No. 21

- 30420 c/w No. 21

- 30487

3 of the Vessel , resulting in an accident that injured four people and damaged moored vessels, barges, and wharfs

. In the dist rict court proceedings, the owner of the Vessel , American Petroleum Tankers X, L

. L

. C

. (“APTX”), sought to be exonerated of liability. The operator of the V essel, Crowley Global Ship Management, Inc. (“Crowley”) , sought to limit its potential liability to the value of the Vessel.
The district court held a bench trial pursuant to the Limitation of Liability Act and entered an injunction staying any related litigation against Crowley
and APTX (the “Vessel Interests”) until the end of the limitation of liabil ity proceedings. See 46 U.S.C. § 30501. The district court ultimately concluded
that the Vessel Interests were not entitled to limit their liability , and it lifted the injunction staying litigation.

The Vessel Interests appeal ed the denial of limited liability in C ase N o. 21

- 30420. Additionally, in a separate appeal, C ase N o. 21

- 30487, the Vessel Interests argue that the district court’s injunction should remain in place until the conclusion of their appeal of the denial of limi ted liability. We consolidate these appeals.
This court “reviews the grant or denial of limited liability for clear
error.” In re Omega Protein, Inc. , 548 F.3d 361, 368 (5th Cir. 2008). The Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 30501, et seq ., allo ws a defendant in

a maritime accident to petition for exoneration from liability . Alternatively,
a defendant could petition to limit its liability to the value of the vessel, plus any pending freight , if it had no privity to or knowledge of any unseaworth y condition or negligent act that was a proximate cause of the accident. In re Omega Protein, 548 F.3d at 371. The district court found that negligence of
the master and crew ca use d the acciden t, and therefore that APTX was not entitled to exoneration from liability

. See Probo II London v. Isla Santay MV , 92 F.3d 361, 365 (5th Cir. 1996) ( “ [I] f the negligence of the master or crew Case: 21-30420 Document: 00516327018 Page: 3 Date Filed: 05/20/2022No. 21

- 30420 c/w No. 21

- 30487

4 contributed to the collision

. . . the shipowner also will face in personam liability ” ). Addit ionally, the district court found that Crowley and APTX are
not entitled to limited liability because they had privity to and knowledge of the negligence.

We find no clear error in the district court’s well

- reasoned opinion
and affirm its denial of limit ed liability

. Our decision renders the appeal in

21

- 30487 moot. Case: 21-30420 Document: 00516327018 Page: 4 Date Filed: 05/20/2022