Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 11, 2021 / Notices 44053 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2 86 FR 33228 (June 24, 2021). 

individual was identified. No associated 

funerary objects are present. 

In 1882, human remains representing, 

at minimum, one individual were 

removed from a gravel deposit at an 

unknown location in Trenton in Mercer 

County, NJ, by Charles C. Abbott as part 

of a Peabody Museum expedition. The 

human remains are fragmentary cranial 

remains of an adult of indeterminate sex 

and age. No known individual was 

identified. No associated funerary 

objects are present. 

On April 18, 1884, human remains 

representing, at minimum, one 

individual were removed from a 

railroad cut in Trenton in Mercer 

County, NJ, by Charles C. Abbott as part 

of a Peabody Museum expedition. The 

human remains were originally 

encountered by workmen digging a cut 

for the railroad in Trenton. The 

workmen excavated the human remains 

and later reconstructed for Abbott the 

original location of the human remains. 

The human remains lay in either 

‘‘ferruginous sand’’ or gravel 16 feet 

below the surface. The human remains 

are fragmentary cranial remains of an 

adult of indeterminate sex and age. No 

known individual was identified. No 

associated funerary objects are present. 

In April 1886, human remains 

representing, at minimum, one 

individual were removed from a 

railroad cut in Trenton in Mercer 

County, NJ, by Charles C. Abbott. Abbott 

donated the human remains to the 

Peabody Museum on May 6, 1886. The 

human remains were removed from the 

railroad cut east of the Pennsylvania 

Railroad passenger station, where they 

lay in gravel 11 feet below the surface. 

The human remains are fragmentary 

cranial remains of an adult of 

indeterminate sex and age. No known 

individual was identified. No associated 

funerary objects are present. 

On September 10, 1895, human 

remains representing, at minimum, one 

individual were removed by Charles C. 

Abbott from the roadside southeast of 

his house in Mercer County, NJ. Abbott 

donated the human remains to the 

Peabody Museum on September 21, 

1895. The human remains lay in gravel. 

The human remains are fragmentary 

cranial remains of an adult of 

indeterminate age who is probably male. 

No known individual was identified. No 

associated funerary objects are present. 

Around 1897, human remains 

representing, at minimum, two 

individuals were removed from an 

unknown site on the ‘‘Assiscunk Creek’’ 

approximately three miles from 

Burlington in Burlington County, NJ, by 

Stacy Scott. Scott conveyed the human 

remains to Charles C. Abbott at an 

unknown date, and Abbott donated the 

human remains to the Peabody Museum 

in 1913. The human remains are the 

partial cranial remains of an adult male 

between the ages of 20 and 40 years old 

and the partial cranial remains of a 

subadult between the ages of 16 and 20 

years old who is probably female. No 

known individuals were identified. No 

associated funerary objects are present. 

Between 1858 and 1887, human 

remains representing, at minimum, one 

individual were removed from ‘‘near 

Hornerstown’’ in Monmouth County, 

NJ, by Samuel Lockwood. Lockwood 

sold the human remains to the Peabody 

Museum in 1888. The human remains 

are the fragmentary cranial and 

postcranial remains of an adult of 

indeterminate sex and age. No known 

individual was identified. The one 

associated funerary object is a cornernotched biface. 

Determinations Made by the Peabody 

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, 

Harvard University 

Officials of the Peabody Museum of 

Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard 

University have determined that: 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the 

human remains described in this notice 

are Native American based on 

osteological analysis, archeological 

context, and museum records. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the 

human remains described in this notice 

represent the physical remains of nine 

individuals of Native American 

ancestry. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(A), 

the one object described in this notice 

is reasonably believed to have been 

placed with or near individual human 

remains at the time of death or later as 

part of the death rite or ceremony. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), a 

relationship of shared group identity 

cannot be reasonably traced between the 

Native American human remains and 

associated funerary object and any 

present-day Indian Tribe. 

• Treaties, Acts of Congress, or 

Executive Orders, indicate that the land 

from which the Native American human 

remains and associated funerary object 

were removed is the aboriginal land of 

the Delaware Nation, Oklahoma; 

Delaware Tribe of Indians; and the 

Stockbridge Munsee Community, 

Wisconsin (hereafter referred to as ‘‘The 

Tribes’’). 

• Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.11(c)(1), the 

disposition of the human remains and 

associated funerary object may be to The 

Tribes. 

Additional Requestors and Disposition 

Representatives of any Indian Tribe or 

Native Hawaiian organization not 

identified in this notice that wish to 

request transfer of control of these 

human remains and associated funerary 

object should submit a written request 

with information in support of the 

request to Patricia Capone, Peabody 

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, 

Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue, 

Cambridge, MA 02138, telephone (617) 

496–3702, email pcapone@

fas.harvard.edu, by September 10, 2021. 

After that date, if no additional 

requestors have come forward, transfer 

of control of the human remains and 

associated funerary object to The Tribes 

may proceed. 

The Peabody Museum of Archaeology 

and Ethnology, Harvard University is 

responsible for notifying The Tribes that 

this notice has been published. 

Dated: July 28, 2021. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17063 Filed 8–10–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1528 (Final)] 

Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and 

Tube From Vietnam 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigation, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), 

that an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

of seamless refined copper pipe and 

tube (‘‘SRC pipe and tube’’) from 

Vietnam, provided for in subheading 

7411.10.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States, that have 

been found by the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in 

the United States at less than fair value 

(‘‘LTFV’’).2

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

investigation effective June 30, 2020, 

following receipt of a petition filed with 

the Commission and Commerce by the 

American Copper Tube Coalition, 

consisting of the Mueller Group, 

Collierville, Tennessee, and Cerro Flow 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
44054 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 11, 2021 / Notices 

3 86 FR 32277 (June 11, 2021). 

Products, LLC, Sauget, Illinois. The 

Commission scheduled the final phase 

of the investigation following 

notification of a preliminary 

determination by Commerce that 

imports of SRC pipe and tube from 

Vietnam were being sold at LTFV 

within the meaning of section 733(b) of 

the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of 

the scheduling of the final phase of the 

Commission’s investigation and of a 

public hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register of February 23, 2021 (86 FR 

10994). Since no party to the 

investigation requested a hearing, the 

public hearing in connection with the 

investigation, originally scheduled for 

June 15, 2021, was canceled.3

The Commission made this 

determination pursuant to § 735(b) of 

the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It 

completed and filed its determination in 

this investigation on August 5, 2021. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 5216 

(August 2021), entitled Seamless 

Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from 

Vietnam: Investigation No. 731–TA– 

1528 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 5, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–17083 Filed 8–10–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1166] 

Certain Foodservice Equipment and 

Components Thereof; Commission 

Determination To Review in Part a 

Final Initial Determination Finding No 

Violation of Section 337; Schedule for 

Filing Written Submissions on the 

Issues Under Review and on Remedy, 

the Public Interest, and Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to review 

in part the final initial determination 

(‘‘final ID’’) issued by the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on 

June 4, 2021, finding no violation of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended. The Commission requests 

briefing from the parties on certain 

issues under review, as indicated in this 

notice. The Commission also requests 

briefing from the parties, interested 

government agencies, and interested 

persons on the issues of remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ronald A. Traud, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3427. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on July 3, 2019, based on a complaint 

filed on behalf of Illinois Tool Works, 

Inc. of Glenview, Illinois; Vesta Global 

Limited of Hong Kong; Vesta 

(Guangzhou) Catering Equipment Co., 

Ltd. of China; and Admiral Craft 

Equipment Corp. of Westbury, New 

York (collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’). 84 

FR 31911 (Jul. 3, 2019). The complaint, 

as supplemented, alleged violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon 

the importation of articles into the 

United States, or in the sale of such 

articles by the owner, importer, or 

consignee of certain foodservice 

equipment and components thereof by 

reason of misappropriation of trade 

secrets and unfair competition through 

tortious interference with contractual 

relationships, the threat or effect of 

which is to destroy or substantially 

injure a domestic industry. Id. at 31911– 

12. The notice of investigation named as 

respondents Guangzhou Rebenet 

Catering Equipment Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd.; Zhou Hao; Aceplus International 

Limited (aka Ace Plus International 

Ltd.); Guangzhou Liangsheng Trading 

Co., Ltd.; and Zeng Zhaoliang, all of 

China. Id. at 31912. The Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also 

named as a party in this investigation. 

Id. 

On July 9, 2020, Order No. 52 granted 

a motion for summary determination of 

no substantial injury to a domestic 

industry. The Commission determined 

to review Order No. 52, and on 

December 14, 2020, reversed the grant of 

summary determination. 

On June 4, 2021, the ALJ issued the 

final ID, which found that Respondents 

did not violate section 337, primarily 

based on a Complainants’ failure to 

establish a domestic industry. The final 

ID found that the Commission has in 

rem jurisdiction over the accused 

products, subject matter jurisdiction, 

and personal jurisdiction. ID at 99. The 

final ID also found that Respondents 

imported into the United States, sold for 

importation, or sold within the United 

States after importation the accused 

products. Id. The final ID further found 

that Respondents have misappropriated 

certain of Complainants’ trade secrets in 

the manufacture of certain accused 

products, but that Complainants have 

not shown that Respondents tortiously 

interfered with contractual 

relationships. Id. The final ID 

additionally found that Complainants 

have not shown that the importation 

and sale of accused products has the 

threat or effect of destroying or 

substantially injuring a domestic 

industry. 

The RD issued on June 10, 2021. The 

RD recommended that, if the 

Commission finds a violation of section 

337, the Commission should issue 

limited exclusion orders of various 

durations for each of the various 

categories of accused products. RD at 

10. The durations of the recommended 

exclusion orders are all quite short, 

ranging from 1–17 months from 

issuance. Id. at 10–11. The RD further 

recommended that a cease and desist 

order would be unnecessary. Id. at 12. 

The RD additionally recommended that 

a bond of 1% of entered value be 

imposed during the period of 

Presidential review. The public interest 

was not delegated to the ALJ. 

On June 21, 2021, Complainants and 

Respondents filed petitions for review 

and OUII filed a contingent petition for 

review. On June 29, 2021, the parties 

filed responses to the petitions. 

Having examined the record in this 

investigation, including the final ID, the 

petitions for review, and the responses 

thereto, the Commission has determined 

to review the final ID in part. In 

particular, the Commission has 

determined to review the following: 

(1) The final ID’s findings and 

conclusions as to the existence of a 

domestic industry and injury to a 

domestic industry. 

(2) The final ID’s findings and 

conclusions regarding the wrongful 

taking and use of the Bills of Materials 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES