Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices 41445 

27See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping 

Duty Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) 

from Taiwan, 67 FR 44174 (July 1, 2002). 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the company 

under review will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is zero or de 

minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required); (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters is 2.40 percent.27 These 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Dated: July 26, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments for SMTC/SSFC 

V. Comparisons to Normal Value 

VI. Date of Sale 

VII. Export Price 

VIII. Normal Value 

IX. Currency Conversion 

X. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–16398 Filed 7–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

and the International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct 

reviews to determine whether 

revocation of a countervailing or 

antidumping duty order or termination 

of an investigation suspended under 

section 704 or 734 of the Act would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping or a 

countervailable subsidy (as the case may 

be) and of material injury. 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for 

September 2021 

Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, 

the following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in September 

2021 and will appear in that month’s 

Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset 

Reviews (Sunset Review). 

Department contact 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, A–602–809 (1st Review) ................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith; (202) 482–5255. 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, A–351–845 (1st Review) ........................................................ Jacky Arrowsmith; (202) 482–5255. 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan, A–588–874 (1st Review) ........................................................ Jacky Arrowsmith; (202) 482–5255. 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Netherlands, A–421–813 (1st Review) .............................................. Jacky Arrowsmith; (202) 482–5255. 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from South Korea, A–580–883 (1st Review) ............................................. Jacky Arrowsmith; (202) 482–5255. 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Turkey, A–489–826 (1st Review) ...................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith; (202) 482–5255. 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from United Kingdom, A–412–825 (1st Review) ........................................ Jacky Arrowsmith; (202) 482–5255. 

Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Russia, A–821–809 (4th Review) ............................ Jacky Arrowsmith; (202) 482–5255. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, C–351–846 (1st Review) ........................................................ Mary Kolberg; (202) 482–1785. 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from South Korea, C–580–884 (1st Review) ............................................. Thomas Martin; (202) 482–3936. 

Suspended Investigations 

Lemon Juice from Argentina, A–357–818 (2nd Review) ............................................................................. Jacky Arrowsmith; (202) 482–5255. 

Commerce’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Review are set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of 

Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review 

provides further information regarding 

what is required of all parties to 

participate in Sunset Review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), 

Commerce will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact Commerce in writing within 10 

days of the publication of the Notice of 

Initiation. 

Please note that if Commerce receives 

a Notice of Intent to Participate from a 

member of the domestic industry within 

15 days of the date of initiation, the 

review will continue. Thereafter, any 

interested party wishing to participate 

in the Sunset Review must provide 

substantive comments in response to the 

notice of initiation no later than 30 days 

after the date of initiation. Note that 

Commerce has modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
41446 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices 

1See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

1See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of 

Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 57145 

(November 4, 2009) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 69586 

(November 3, 2020). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

511 (January 6, 2021). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Diamond Sawblades and 

Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China 

Administrative Review 2019–2020: Respondent 

Selection,’’ dated March 2, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and 

Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

6See Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond 

Sawblades from the People’s Republic of China— 

No Sales Certification,’’ dated February 5, 2021; 

Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., 

Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Submission of Statement of No Shipments,’’ dated 

February 4, 2021; Danyang Weiwang Tools 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond 

Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Submission of Statement of No 

Shipments,’’ dated January 20, 2021; Husqvarna 

(Hebei) Co., Ltd.’s and Husqvarna Construction 

Products North America’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond 

Sawblades from the People’s Republic of China: 

Notification of No Shipments,’’ dated January 12, 

2021; Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial 

Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘No Shipment Letter for Weihai 

Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.: 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ dated February 12, 

2021; and, Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools 

Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Submission of Statement of No Shipments,’’ dated 

January 18, 2021. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘No shipment inquiry with 

respect to the companies below during the period 

11/01/2019 through 10/31/2020,’’ dated March 25, 

2021; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades 

and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China; No Shipment Inquiry for Wuhan Wanbang 

Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. during the period 

11/01/2019 through 10/31/2020,’’ dated May 25, 

2021. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Notification of Receipt of 

U.S. Entry Documents,’’ dated April 1, 2021 at 

Attachment 1; see also Commerce’s Letter placing 

entry documentation on the record, dated June 25, 

2021. 

9See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 6–7. 

10See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 7. 

11See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.1

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: July 21, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–16433 Filed 7–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–900] 

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

certain producers and/or exporters 

made sales of diamond sawblades and 

parts thereof (diamond sawblades) at 

less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR) November 1, 

2019, through October 31, 2020. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results of 

review. 

DATES: Applicable August 2, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Allison Hollander, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2805. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 4, 2009, we published 

in the Federal Register an antidumping 

duty order on diamond sawblades from 

the Peoples’ Republic of China (China).1

On November 3, 2020, we published in 

the Federal Register a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the Order.2 On January 6, 

2021, based on timely requests for an 

administrative review, Commerce 

initiated the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on diamond 

sawblades.3 The administrative review 

covers 53 companies, which is inclusive 

of the two mandatory respondents, 

Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity (Jiangsu 

Fengtai) and Zhejiang Wanli Tool Group 

Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Wanli).4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this Order 

are diamond sawblades. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.5

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Six companies that received a 

separate rate in previous segments of the 

proceeding and are subject to this 

review reported that they did not have 

any exports of subject merchandise 

during the POR.6 To date, we have 

found no evidence calling into question 

the no-shipment claims made by four of 

these companies; 7 therefore, we 

preliminarily find that these four 

companies had no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. For two of the six companies, 

because CBP data indicated entries 

during the POR, we requested entry 

documentation from CBP.8 Based on 

information on the record, we 

preliminarily find that Husqvarna 

(Hebei) Co., Ltd. (Husqvarna) had 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR. Therefore, because it did not 

file a separate rate application or 

separate rate certification (SRC), we are 

preliminarily considering Husqvarna to 

be part of the China-wide entity. We 

additionally find, based on information 

on the record, that Weihai Xiangguang 

Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd. (Weihai 

Xiangguang) did not have entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

Therefore, we preliminarily find that 

Weihai Xiangguang had no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR. For additional 

information regarding these preliminary 

determinations, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Separate Rates 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that one respondent is eligible to receive 

a separate rate in this review.9

Separate Rates for Eligible NonSelected Respondents 

Consistent with our practice, because 

we preliminarily denied the separate 

rate eligibility for the two respondents 

selected for individual examination, 

Jiangsu Fengtai and Zhejiang Wanli, and 

treated them as part of the China-wide 

entity, we preliminarily applied to the 

non-selected respondent the separate 

rate assigned to eligible respondents in 

the last completed administrative 

review, which is 0.00 percent.10

China-Wide Entity 

Under Commerce’s policy regarding 

the conditional review of the Chinawide entity,11 the China-wide entity 

will not be under review unless a party 

specifically requests, or Commerce selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES