Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 43185 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

54983 (September 3, 2020). 

2 In the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation 

of the AD order, we collapsed Prosperity, YP, and 

Synn and treated them as a single entity. See 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of 

Critical Circumstances, in Part, 81 FR 35313 (June 

2, 2016), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 3 (Taiwan CORE LTFV 

Final), unchanged in Certain Corrosion-Resistant 

Steel Products from India, Italy, the People’s 

Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and 

Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping 

Determination for India and Taiwan, and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 48390 (July 25, 

2016) (Order). The determination to collapse 

Prosperity with Synn was challenged by respondent 

parties in the investigation and was subject to 

pending litigation in Taiwan CORE LTFV Final. In 

the first antidumping duty administrative review, 

we determined to no longer collapse Prosperity 

with YP and Synn, but we continued to collapse YP 

and Synn and treated them as a single entity. See 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From 

Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 

2017, 83 FR 39679 (August 10, 2018); unchanged 

in Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From 

Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 64527 

(December 17, 2018); amended by Certain 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: 

Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 84 FR 5991 

(February 25, 2019). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant 

Steel Products from Taiwan: Extension of Time 

Limit for Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

March 25, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

the 2019–2020 Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from Taiwan,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

5For the full text of the scope of the Order, see 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–16840 Filed 8–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–856] 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products From Taiwan: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that producers/exporters subject to this 

review made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR) July 

1, 2019, through June 30, 2020. We 

further preliminarily determine that 

Synn Industrial Co., Ltd. (Synn) had no 

shipments during the POR. We are also 

rescinding this review for three 

companies. We invite interested parties 

to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable August 6, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles Doss or Kate Sliney, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4474 and (202) 482–2437, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

corrosion-resistant steel products 

(CORE) from Taiwan,1 covering the 

following two respondents: (1) 

Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

(Prosperity); and (2) the previously 

collapsed Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

(YP) and Synn entity (collectively, YP/ 

Synn).2 On March 25, 2021, we 

extended the preliminary results of this 

review to no later than July 30, 2021.3

For a complete description of the events 

that followed the initiation of this 

review, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.4 A list of topics included 

in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, the 

complete Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. 

Scope of the Order 5

The products covered by the Order 

are flat-rolled steel products, either clad, 

plated, or coated with corrosionresistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, 

or zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or ironbased alloys, whether or not corrugated 

or painted, varnished, laminated, or 

coated with plastics or other nonmetallic substances in addition to the 

metallic coating. The subject 

merchandise is currently classifiable 

under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings: 7210.30.0030, 

7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 

7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0040, 

7210.49.0045, 7210.49.0091, 

7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 

7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 

7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 

7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 

7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 

7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 

7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 

7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and 

7212.60.0000. The products subject to 

the orders may also enter under the 

following HTSUS item numbers: 

7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 

7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 

7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 

7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 

7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 

7217.90.5090, 7225.91.0000, 

7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090, 

7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 

7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 

7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000. The 

HTSUS subheadings above are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes 

only. The written description of the 

scope of the Order is dispositive. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party who requested the review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review. On 

November 30, 2020, Great Grandeul 

Steel Co., Ltd., Great Fortune Steel Co., 

Ltd., and Great Grandeul Steel Company 

Limited (a.k.a. Great Grandeul Steel 

Company Limited Somoa and Great 

Grandeul Steel Company Limited 

(Somoa)) timely withdrew their selfrequest for an administrative review. No 

other party requested a review of these 

companies. Accordingly, we are 

rescinding this review, in part, with 

respect to these companies, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

On September 30, 2020, Synn 

submitted a letter certifying that it had 

no exports or sales of subject 

merchandise into the United States 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
43186 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 

6See Synn’s Letter, ‘‘Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from Taiwan; No Shipment Certification,’’ 

dated September 30, 2020. 

7See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of 

Review, Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 

24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51306, 

51307 (August 28, 2014). 

8See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019, 85 FR 

74669 (November 23, 2020), unchanged in Certain 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final Determination of 

No Shipments; 2018–2019, 86 FR 28554 (May 27, 

2021). 

9See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 

Section V, ‘‘Affiliation and Collapsing.’’ 

10 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

11See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

12See Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony 

with Final Determination of Antidumping Duty 

Investigation and Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Investigation, 84 FR 6129 

(February 26, 2019) (Amended Final 

Determination). 

13For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

during the POR.6 Currently, the record 

contains no information which 

contradicts Synn’s claim, and we will 

revisit this issue following these 

preliminary results if we receive 

additional information from U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP). 

Therefore, pursuant to our preliminarily 

determination to treat YP and Synn as 

distinct respondents for the purposes of 

this administrative review, as discussed 

immediately below, we preliminarily 

determine that Synn did not have any 

reviewable transactions during the POR. 

Consistent with Commerce’s practice, 

we will not rescind the review with 

respect to Synn, but rather will 

complete the review and issue 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results.7

Affiliation and Collapsing 

As noted above, YP and Synn were 

collapsed and treated as a single entity 

for the purposes of the LTFV 

investigation and prior administrative 

reviews of this antidumping order. As a 

result, we selected the YP/Synn entity 

as a single combined respondent and 

treated it as such in the pre-preliminary 

phase of this review. Subsequently, in 

the immediately preceding 

administrative review of this case, we 

determined that YP and Synn should no 

longer be collapsed.8 As the instant 

record mirrors that of the preceding 

review with respect to this issue, and 

we have received no comments 

contesting the determination not to 

collapse the YP/Synn entity, we 

preliminarily determine that YP and 

Synn should not be collapsed in this 

review.9

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and 

(2) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). Export price and constructed 

export price were calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

the following weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Prosperity Tieh Enterprise 

Co., Ltd. ............................ 3.63 

Sheng Yu Steel Co., Ltd. ..... 3.08 

Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., 

Ltd. .................................... 1.97 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce shall determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. 

For any individually examined 

respondents whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis 

(i.e., 0.50 percent), we will calculate 

importer-specific ad valorem AD 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the importer’s examined sales to the 

total entered value of those same sales 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).10 We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review when the importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. The final results of 

this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review where 

applicable. 

For the company which was not 

selected for individual review (i.e., 

Sheng Yu Steel Co., Ltd.), we will assign 

an assessment rate based on the 

weighted-average of the cash deposit 

rates calculated for the companies 

selected for mandatory review (i.e., 

Prosperity and YP), excluding any 

which are de minimis or determined 

entirely on adverse facts available. The 

final results of this review shall be the 

basis for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.11

In accordance with Commerce’s 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by each respondent 

for which they did not know that their 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate entries not reviewed at the allothers rate of 3.66 percent established in 

the LTFV investigation 12 if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.13 We intend 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

no earlier than 35 days after date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of CORE from 

Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for each company listed 

above will be equal to the dumping 

margins established in the final results 

of this review except if the ultimate 

rates are de minimis within the meaning 

of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case 

the cash deposit rates will be zero; (2) 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 43187 

14See Amended Final Determination. 15See AK Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Petitioner’s Request for 

Verification,’’ dated December 3, 2020. 16See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

17See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary 

Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due 

to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006 (March 26, 2020); and 

Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) 

(collectively, Temporary Rule). 

18See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

19See Temporary Rule. 

20See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

21See 19 CFR 351.310. 

for merchandise exported by producers 

or exporters not covered in this 

administrative review but covered in a 

prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the producer or 

exporter participated; (3) if the exporter 

is not a firm covered in this review, a 

prior review, or the original LTFV 

investigation but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of the proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 3.66 percent, the all-others rate 

established in Amended Final 

Determination.14 These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Verification 

On December 3, 2020, AK Steel 

Corporation (AK Steel), a domestic 

interested party, requested, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.307(b)(1)(v) that Commerce 

conduct verification of the 

questionnaire responses of Prosperity 

and YP.15 Commerce is currently unable 

to conduct on-site verification of the 

information relied upon in making its 

final results of this administrative 

review. Accordingly, we intend to take 

additional steps in lieu of on-site 

verification to verify the information. 

Commerce will notify interested parties 

of any additional documentation or 

information required. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce will disclose to parties to 

this proceeding the calculations 

performed in reaching the preliminary 

results within five days of the date of 

publication of these preliminary 

results.16 Case briefs may be submitted 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Interested parties will be notified of the 

timeline for the submission of such case 

briefs and written comments at a later 

date. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed no 

later than seven days after the date for 

filing case briefs.17 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are requested to submit with 

the argument: (1) A statement of the 

issue, (2) a summary of the argument, 

and (3) a table of authorities.18 All briefs 

must be filed electronically using 

ACCESS. An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic 

records system, ACCESS. Note that 

Commerce has temporarily modified 

certain of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information, until further 

notice.19

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, using 

Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS 

system within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.20 Requests should contain 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number, the number of 

participants, and a list of the issues to 

be discussed. If a request for a hearing 

is made, we will inform parties of the 

scheduled date for the hearing at a time 

and location to be determined.21 Parties 

should confirm by telephone the date, 

time, and location of the hearing. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), 

Commerce will issue the final results of 

this administrative review, including 

the results of our analysis of the issues 

raised by the parties in their case briefs, 

not later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results of review 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 30, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

V. Affiliation and Collapsing 

VI. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

VII. Duty Absorption 

VIII. Rate for Respondent Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

IX. Discussion of the Methodology 

X. Currency Conversion 

XI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–16838 Filed 8–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–051, C–570–052] 

Certain Hardwood Plywood Products 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Notice of Court Decision Not in 

Harmony With Final Circumvention 

Determination and Notice of Amended 

Final Circumvention Determination 

Pursuant to Court Decision 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 21, 2021, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

issued its final judgment in Shelter 

Forest International Acquisition Inc., et 

al. v. United States, Consol. Court no. 

19–00212, sustaining the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce)’s first remand 

redetermination pertaining to the anticircumvention determination for the 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders on certain hardwood plywood 

products (plywood) from the People’s 

Republic of China. In the underlying 

inquiry, Commerce originally found that 

plywood with face and back veneers of 

radiata and/or agathis pine that: (1) Has 

a Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 

or California Air Resources Board 

(CARB) label certifying that it is 

compliant with TSCA/CARB 

requirements; and (2) is made with a 

resin, the majority of which is 

comprised of one or more of the 

following three product types—urea 

formaldehyde, polyvinyl acetate, and/or 

soy (inquiry merchandise) was 

circumventing the orders, and was, 

therefore, included in the scope of the 

orders. Commerce is notifying the 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES