alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

Calendar No. 269

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1336

For the relief of Roy Desmond Moser.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 29, 1997

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

A BILL

For the relief of Roy Desmond Moser.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF NATU4 RALIZATION OF ROY DESMOND MOSER.

5 Notwithstanding title III of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act, any predecessor provisions to such title, or

7 any other provision of law relating to naturalization, for

8 purposes of determining the eligibility of Roy Desmond

9 Moser for relief under the Agreement Between the Gov-
2

S 1336 RS

1 ernment of the United States and the Government of the

2 Federal Republic of Germany Concerning Final Benefits

3 to Certain United States Nationals Who Were Victims of

4 National Socialist Measures of Persecution, signed at

5 Bonn on September 19, 1995, Roy Desmond Moser is

6 deemed to be a naturalized citizen of the United States

7 as of August 8, 1942.

Calendar No. 269

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1336

A BILL

For the relief of Roy Desmond Moser.

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Reported without amendment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,892,970
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,205,390
<PP&E>                                       2,875,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,264,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,633,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,500,000
<COMMON>                                     3,887,194
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,158,676)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,264,138
<SALES>                                        886,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               886,851
<CGS>                                          396,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,257,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                276,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (9,517)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   267,012
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
#### Bernard Gomberg, Respondent, v Joy Gorman, as Town Clerk of the Town of Ramapo, Appellant.

—In a proceed*584ing pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the appellant to accept certain petitions and to place the proposition referred to in the petitions on the ballot for the general election to be held on November 8, 1983, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Delaney, J.), dated November 2, 1983, which ordered the Town Board of the Town of Ramapo joined as a necessary party to the action and found that the petitions seeking a referendum were not invalid solely on the basis that they failed to include the signers’ election districts.

Appeal from so much of the order as directed joinder of the town board and its individual members dismissed as appellant is not aggrieved thereby *(see,*CPLR 5511).

Order otherwise reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed.

Appellant is awarded one bill of costs.

Between September 28, 1983, and October 6, 1983, petitioner submitted petitions containing 1,706 signatures to the appellant Town Clerk of the Town of Ramapo in order to place on the ballot the issue of whether a ward system for the election of council members should be established. The town clerk rejected all the petitions for failure to comply with Election Law § 6-130 in that the election districts of the signers were not set forth. Petitioner then commenced a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the town clerk to accept the petitions and to place the proposition referred to therein on the ballot. Special Term found the invalidation of the petitions based upon the failure to include the election districts was improper and directed that the town board, which was the real party with authority to place the proposition on the ballot, be joined as a necessary party.

The town clerk’s appeal from that part of the order which directed the joinder of the town board as a necessary party must be dismissed as he is not aggrieved thereby *(see,*CPLR 5511). In any event, we note that the joinder of such party without a direction to serve a supplemental summons specifying the pleading which must be answered was error as no jurisdiction is obtained over additional parties without such service *(see,*CPLR 305 [a]; 1001 [b]; *see also, Schmidt v Schmidt,*99 AD2d 775; *Kaplan v Kaplan,*94 AD2d 788).

Finally, we find that Special Term erred in holding that the election districts of the signers of the petitions were not required. Election Law § 6-130, which requires inclusion of the election districts, applies to referendum petitions governed by *585Town Law § 91 *(Matter of Lindley v Babylon Town Clerk,*80 AD2d 879, *affd*53 NY2d 683). Therefore, invalidation by the town clerk of the petitions lacking such election districts was proper and the proceeding must be dismissed. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 125 Filed: 02/20/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:430

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 125 Filed: 02/20/18 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:431

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 125 Filed: 02/20/18 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:432

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 125 Filed: 02/20/18 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:433

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 125 Filed: 02/20/18 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:434

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 125 Filed: 02/20/18 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:435

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 125 Filed: 02/20/18 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:436
#### Franklin *et al. v.*Bank of Colbert.

Hill, J.

1. The act of 1912 (Acts 1912, p. 153), relating to notes given for the sale of stock in incorporated companies, being a substantial reproduction of the act of 1897 (Civil Code, §§ 4293, 4294) relating to notes given for the sale of patent rights, is to be similarly construed, and, being thus construed, is controlled by the decisions in the cases of *Smith*v. *Wood,*111 *Ga.*221 (36 S. E. 649); *Parr*v. *Erickson,*115 *Ga.**52873 (42 S. E. 240); *Hunt*v. *Davenport,*138 *Ga.*622 (75 S. E. 644) ; *Heard*v. *National Bank of Wilkes,*ante, 48 (84 S. E. 129).

January 16, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Beid. Newton superior court. November 12, 1913.

*B. W. Milner,*for plaintiffs in error. *Rogers & Knox,*contra.

2. There was no error in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Wireless Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Hathaway, the Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, that I believe that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated:  October 11, 2002





WORLD WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.By:

/s/    ROBERT W.
HATHAWAYRobert W. Hathaway Vice
President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
No. 76-560.

#### Spitzer Akron, Inc. *v.*National Labor Relations Board.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIS FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         784,433
<SECURITIES>                                    75,659
<RECEIVABLES>                                  194,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,022
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,089,446
<PP&E>                                          74,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,456,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          351,716
<BONDS>                                        561,771
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           384
<OTHER-SE>                                     523,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,456,351
<SALES>                                        317,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               563,717
<CGS>                                           13,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  569,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,352
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,871)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,871)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.
</FN>


</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

--=-- 

Ron. GJn* LCfOY?4 

county riud1tor 

Clay county 

Hbnrlotta, ?exas 

and 0onsidoreQ. 

nFlease advis 

of a County on 

to p ur o h a l nr b 

or is tms 0 

Revised Civil stlltuta s @ f Tsx l 

wch mnth OS hia 

ioox nerd harein 

l e bush shall mnke 

rsqulmd by lew, 

4tat4flent OS 4311 the 

rxp4anr4 inouzrad by 

tlr oftloe, much aa 

tU?ZFS, t4lOFhOZl4, FrSriWS 05 

n@lJ, iZiOiUdin.? th0 OoBt Of 4Ul-4. 

hia 2eputie4, precium on fim, 

heft, '"-"J,insurano4 pmteotlo funds, traveling exponoas and 

other naceesary 4xpen444. Tbbr Cocr&srlon4ra1 

coxrt af the oounty of the OheriifwB mniamor nay, upon the written end morn appllcation of the Ehcrlff 8tuti.ng the neW388lt9 
HO& vrayn4 Lerevm, Page z 

therefor, purohase equipment rok a bureau or 

orir,inel itlentiffoatlon such a8 oamraa, ringer prlnt oarda, Inks, chemloala, mlorosoopss, 

radio and laboratory equipmcmt, filihg oardrr, 

Ww cabinets, tear gas and other equipment 

In keepi% with the eyetem in ~4 b9 the Deptmbent of Publio Safety of this State or the 

United States Department or cTuatloe and/or 

Bureau of Criminal Idsntlrioation....w (underaooring cure) 

You are themion, reepeotfully advised that It 

la the opinion of thls departrcent that the oomisalon4rs1 

court is authorized to purohase and expend oounty fund.9 

ror a radio Sor the Sheriff's orfice under the above artiOh. 

Very truly goura 

AToxfx OENERA’, OF ?Ex;s 

wrl. J. Fanning 

Assistant
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EUROTECH,
LTD. BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            157
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       6
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  169
<PP&E>                                             41
<DEPRECIATION>                                     13
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,143
<BONDS>                                         6,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            6
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,576)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      232
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,502)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)



</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 16, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00194

- CR

Leroy Pickens, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILLS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, B AKER , AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the part ies’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Because

appel lant is indigent and u n able to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Animal Environmental Systems Research: Bowling Green, KY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Models & Software
                        Sorption Isotherm Spreadsheets
                                    Annual Phosphorus Loss Estimator (APLE) Model
                                    Modified Arcsine Log Calibration Curve (ALCC)Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Bowling Green, Kentucky Food Animal Environmental Systems Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Sorption Isotherm Spreadsheet
- Research Projects
- Publications
- Carl Bolster
- Sorption Isotherm Spreadsheet
- Annual Phosphorus Loss Estimator (APLE) Model

Carl H Bolster
                     

                     Research Hydrologist


                     Phone: (270) 781-2632
                      ext. 244
                     

                     Fax: (270) 781-7994
                     

                     2413 NASHVILLE RD - B5                            
                     
                     

                     BOWLING GREEN                 , KY 42101


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 99.01**

** **

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002)**

 

I, Robert W. Deutsch, Ph.D.,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)of RWD Technologies, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of myknowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

** **

** **
| /s/ Robert  W. Deutsch, Ph.D.                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert W.  Deutsch, Ph.D.                        |
| Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 12, 2003                                     |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,242,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,464,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    820,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,139,704
<PP&E>                                         506,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,633,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,580,501
<BONDS>                                        609,068
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          456,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,155
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,932,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,633,435
<SALES>                                      7,591,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,591,123
<CGS>                                        6,377,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,377,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,580,323)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (389,423)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,190,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (253,154)
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,444,054)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)


</TABLE>