alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                             |                                 |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                               |                             |
|                          |                        |                            |
| Dated:                May 10, 2006 | By:                    | /s/              HARRY J. WHITE, JR. |
|                               | Harry              J. White, Jr. |
|                               |
#### In the Matter of Ingrid Jno-Charles, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 171]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered January 13, 2011, denying the petition to annul the determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority, dated May 6, 2010, which found petitioner ineligible for public housing until April 30, 2013 because she did not meet the standards for admission, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination, and its interpretation of its own standards of admission, are rational and reasonable and should be sustained *(see Matter of Marzec v DeBuono,*95 NY2d 262, 266 [2000]; *see also Matter of Muhammad v New York City Hous. Auth.,*81 AD3d 526 [2011]). Indeed, respondent’s written standards for admission provide that an applicant who is responsible for a fire in a prior residence shall be ineligible for public housing for four years from the date of the fire. Respondent’s deter*520mination, that petitioner was ineligible for public housing because she was responsible for a fire in a prior residence, had a rational basis in the record, including a Fire Marshal’s report stating that the fire in petitioner’s prior apartment on April 30, 2009 was caused by an unattended candle left in combustible material on her kitchen table. There was no evidence before the agency that anyone other than petitioner or a member of her household was responsible for the fire. Petitioner’s argument that her landlord was responsible for the fire was improperly raised for the first time in the article 78 proceeding *(see Matter of Yonkers Gardens Co. v State of N.Y. Div. of Hous. & Community*Renewal, 51 NY2d 966, 967 [1980]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
Case: 1:02-cv-06734 Document #: 17 Filed: 04/01/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:101
Case: 1:02-cv-06734 Document #: 17 Filed: 04/01/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:102
Case: 1:02-cv-06734 Document #: 17 Filed: 04/01/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:103
Case: 1:02-cv-06734 Document #: 17 Filed: 04/01/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:104
Case: 1:02-cv-06734 Document #: 17 Filed: 04/01/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:105
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Great Basin Rangelands Research: Reno, NV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Newsletter
                        Volume 1
                                    Volume 2Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Reno, Nevada Great Basin Rangelands Research Rangeland Rehabilitation Lab Clements posters







Outreachheadline bar  Posters Presentations   Society of Range Management  Soil and Water Conservation Society  Western Society Weed Science  Weed Science Society America       Rangeland Rehabilitation Lab "Home Page"


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
03-1032.005 January 27, 2005

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

 v. ) No. 03 CR 1032 

)

H. MARC WATZMAN, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The court has considered the briefs of the parties filed

subsequent to the order of December 8, 2004, and is still of the

view that this case is controlled by United States v. Johnson, 376

F.3d 689, 693-94 (7th Cir. 2004). In short, the doctrine of legal

impossibility is inapplicable. The defendant is charged with

attempting to receive actual child pornography. If completed, this

would be a criminal act, and therefore the attempt would be

criminal. If the photos turn out to be “virtual” children, or

actual adults, defendant would still be criminally responsible for

the attempt, provided he intended to receive pornographic photos of

actual children. The critical question is whether what the

defendant intends to do is criminal; if it is, and he acts on that

intention, it makes no difference that circumstances make

completion of the criminal act impossible, as, for instance, when

the photos the defendant thought would be pornographic photos of
- 2 -

real children turn out to be photos of adults or virtual children.

The point is illustrated by the recent Seventh Circuit case of

In re Nettles, No. 04-4104, 2005 WL 120505 (7th Cir. Jan. 21, 2005).

The issue on appeal was whether the trial judge should have recused

herself in a case where the defendant was charged with attempting

to bomb the Dirksen Courthouse. The defendant allegedly arranged

to obtain explosives from one undercover FBI agent and to sell them

to another undercover agent who pretended to be a terrorist bent on

destroying the building. Whether this constituted an attempt was

not the issue in the case, so the Court had no occasion to discuss

it. But the significant thing about the opinion for our purposes

is that it assumes the defendant’s alleged conduct would constitute

an attempt, despite the following observation: “Of course the

actual threat to the Dirksen Courthouse was nil because Nettles’s

accomplices were federal agents. 2005 WL 120505, at *2. 

The indictment here charges an attempt to obtain photos of

actual children, and at this stage of the proceeding the court has

no reason to believe the government will be unable to present

evidence sufficient to create a jury question as to whether this

was the defendant’s intent. Accordingly, defendant’s motion in

limine to bar the government from presenting still photos that have

not been authenticated as images of actual children is denied. 
- 3 -

DATED: January 27, 2005

ENTER: _________________________________________________

John F. Grady, United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 149 (Friday, August 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43232-43233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DoD-2021-OS-0055]


Request for Information Related to IP Evaluation and Valuation 
Methods and Techniques

AGENCY: Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Acquisition Enablers), Department of Defense (DoD).

[[Page 43233]]


ACTION: Request for information; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 1, 2021, the DoD published a notice soliciting 
information from the public (including, but not limited to, the private 
sector, academia, and other interested parties) related to Intellectual 
Property (IP) evaluation and valuation methods and techniques. 
Subsequent to publication of the notice, DoD is extending the comment 
period from August 2, 2021 to September 17, 2021.

DATES: The comment period for the notice published on July 1, 2021 (86 
FR 35076-35078) is extended. The due date for submitting comments is 
September 17, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: DoD cannot receive written comments at this time due to the 
COVID-19 pandemic. Comments should be sent electronically to the docket 
listed above.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. George Winborne, Communications, 
Knowledge and Performance Management Lead, Intellectual Property Cadre, 
Office of the USD (Acquisition & Sustainment), at 202-815-3995, or 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfb8bab0adb8baf1b0f1a8b6b1bdb0adb1baf1bcb6a99fb2beb6b3f1b2b6b3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96f1f3f9e4f1f3b8f9b8e1fff8f4f9e4f8f3b8f5ffe0d6fbf7fffab8fbfffa">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The public comment period in extended to 
September 17, 2021. All other information in the notice of July 1, 2021 
remains the same.

    Dated: August 3, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-16848 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.2.2

Eastern Division

Quentin Bullock, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:04−cv−01051

Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo

Thomas Dart, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, March 31, 2009:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Defendants' motion (433)

for a stay pending appeal is granted. I do not believe the Seventh Circuit will disagree

with my ruling on Eleventh Amendment immunity but the appeal of the issue is not

frivolous and it would be a waste of resources to have a trial in the meantime if the

Seventh Circuit disagrees with me.Mailed notice(mpj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case 1:04-cv-01051 Document 446 Filed 03/31/09 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1304 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1304

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                  For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Belinda 
McGregor shall be held and considered to have been selected for a 
diversity immigrant visa for fiscal year 1998 as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Belinda McGregor as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year the 
total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(c) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153 (c)).

            Passed the Senate November 8, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1304

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                  For the relief of Belinda McGregor.
```
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Brent W. Christensen, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meade Instruments Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingDate:January 17, 2006
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUS;

PENALTY FOR

2/4/2015 PRIVATE USE

HARGROVE, MARCUS WAYnIe

The Court has dismissed your application for writof habeas corpus without written

order; the sentence has been discharged: See Exparte Harrington, 310 S.W.3d

452 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). ^ '

,T?:fcCf

02 1R

00020031S2 FEB09 2015

Cfti^D FROM WRW1 ,W5;!02

Abel Acosta, Cle'-1 $ \

MARCUS WAYNE HARGROVE

1926H"§B

I* H3B

\s
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1109

To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundary of the Devils Backbone

Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to exclude

a small parcel of land containing improvements.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1997

Mr. BOND (for himself and Mr. ASHCROFT) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To make a minor adjustment in the exterior boundary of

the Devils Backbone Wilderness in the Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri, to exclude a small parcel of

land containing improvements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, DEVILS BACKBONE

4 WILDERNESS, MARK TWAIN NATIONAL FOR5 EST, MISSOURI.

6 The boundary of the Devils Backbone Wilderness es7 tablished by section 201(d) of Public Law 96–560 (16

8 U.S.C. 1132 note; 94 Stat. 3273) in the Mark Twain Na-
2

•S 1109 IS

1 tional Forest, Missouri, is modified to exclude from the

2 area encompassed by the Devils Backbone Wilderness a

3 parcel of real property consisting of approximately 2 acres

4 in Ozark County, Missouri, and containing a garage, well,

5 mailbox, driveway, and other improvements, as depicted

6 on a map entitled ‘‘Devils Backbone Wilderness Boundary

7 Modification’’, dated June 1996. The map shall be re8 tained with other Forest Service maps and legal descrip9 tions regarding the Devils Backbone Wilderness and shall

10 be made available for public inspection as provided in sec11 tion 202 of Public Law 96–560 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note;

12 94 Stat. 3274).

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10227 Summary Calendar

HARUN NASSOR TALIB, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MARK A. VERNON, #6528; JEFFREY L. BURGE, #6026; LITTLE, Officer, #5337; SMITH, Officer, #6039 JUNGER, Officer, #6388, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CV-71-P

- - - - - - - - - - July 16, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Harun Nassor Talib, Texas state prisoner #97089058, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The district court held that his claims were premature under Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). “[A] claim of unlawful arrest, standing alone, does not necessarily implicate the validity of a criminal prosecutionNo. 98-10227 -2- following the arrest.” Mackey v. Dickson , 47 F.3d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 1995). See Montoya v. Scott , 65 F.3d 405, 421 (5th Cir. 1995) (noting the “established rule that illegal arrest or detention does not void a subsequent conviction”). Talib’s complaint challenges the legality of his arrest. There is no indication in the record that any evidence served as a result of that arrest is being used for a criminal prosecution. See Mackey , 47 F.3d at 746. We accordingly VACATE the district court’s dismissal invoking Heck and REMAND for further proceedings.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
#### Leckie *v.*Leckie.

March 9, 1915.

Temporary alimony. Before Judge Jones. Hall superior court. July 31, 1914.

*W. B. Sloan*and *B. P. Gaillard Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. M. Johnson*and *A. 0. Wheeler,*contra.

Hill, J.

Under the facts of this case there was no abuse of discretion in granting the wife temporary alimony and attorney’s fees.

*Judgment affirmed..*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*