alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                               9,119
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         28,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    40,842
<PP&E>                                               6,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      45,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               25,955
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                75
<OTHER-SE>                                          19,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        45,734
<SALES>                                             81,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    81,396
<CGS>                                               67,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       67,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,475
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,154
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,154
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .30


</TABLE>
#### Girvin *v.*Georgia Veneer & Package Company; *et vice versa.*

Beck, J.

1. Having held, when this ease was before the Supreme Court on a former occasion, that the allegations of the petition showed a cause of action, and evidence having been introduced on the trial which would have authorized the jury to find that the material and essential allegations of the petition had been sustained, the court should not have taken the case from the consideration of the jury by granting a nonsuit.

2. It being inferable from the evidence as to the exclamation made by the *763decedent, “Ok, my God; I didn’t want to go out there!” that it was made immediately after receiving the painful and fatal injuries and under circumstances which excluded all idea of device or afterthought, it should have been admitted in evidence as a part of the res gestee, and as tending to illustrate the material question as to whether he voluntarily left the place in the mill at which he was engaged and went to work at the place where he received his injuries.

July 21, 1915.

Action for damages. Before Judge Conyers. Glynn superior court. June *25,*1914.

*H. F. Dunwody, F. H. Harris,*and *D. W. Krauss,*for plaintiff.

*Bennet, Twitty & Reese, A. J. Crovatt,*and *Ryals & Anderson,*for defendant.

3. While of slight materiality, evidence as to the way in which the youth was dressed was not entirely immaterial and irrelevant, as it might be considered by the jury on- the question as to whether the superintendent, the alter ego of the defendant company, was put on notice of the youth of the deceased.

4. An allegation of certain material facts as true “to the best of the plaintiff’s knowledge and belief” is not a proper allegation in common-law pleading; and the special demurrer criticising the paragraph containing this allegation should have been sustained.

5. The allegations contained in the amendment offered at the trial, which attempt to set forth with greater particularity the circumstances leading up to and resulting in the injuries which resulted in the death of the plaintiff’s son, are in certain material' respects contradictory of the „ allegations as to the way and manner in which the injuries were inflicted as stated in the original petition; and while these allegations might have been properly set forth in another count, they can not be appropriately incorporated by amendment in the original petition, as, for the reason just stated, they render the pleadings uncertain and duplicitous; and it was error to allow the amendment over objections duly made by the defendant.

6. Except as to the grounds of demurrer dealt with in the last two head-notes, and which relate to assignments of error contained in the cross-bill of exceptions, the special demurrers were properly overruled.

*Judgment reversed on hoth hills of exceptions.*

*All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., disqualified.*
#### Orlando C. DIAZ; Brenda Aracely Carrera, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-2297.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 7, 2011.

Decided: July 12, 2011.

Dustin W. Dyer, Dyer Immigration Law Group, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Petitioners. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Senior Litigation Counsel, R. Alexander Goring, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

*688Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Orlando C. Diaz and his wife, Brenda Aracely Carrera, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1008.2(a) (2011) (setting forth standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *In re: Diaz*(B.I.A. Oct. 20, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
grts-ex101_164.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 

Amendment #3 to Research Collaboration and License Agreement

 

This Amendment #3 (“Amendment”) to the Research Collaboration and License Agreement is made by and between Gritstone Oncology, Inc. (“Gritstone”) and Bluebird Bio, Inc. (“Bluebird”). This Amendment is effective as of February 18, 2021 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).

 

WHEREAS, Gritstone and Bluebird are parties to that Research Collaboration and License Agreement effective as of August 20, 2018 and amended as of August 20, 2019 and August 19, 2020 (the “Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, Gritstone and Bluebird desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound, Gritstone and Bluebird hereby agree to modify, replace or supplement the terms of the Agreement, as the case may be, as follows: 


	
1.
	
Definitions. All Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 




 


	
2.
	
Amendment to Section 2.3(b) (Gritstone Analysis of Tissue Types of Interest). Section 2.3(b) is modified by extending the Tissue Analysis Period to December 31, 2021. 




 


	
3.
	
Amendment to Section 2.3(b) (Gritstone Analysis of Tissue Types of Interest). Section 2.3(b) is modified by increasing the tumor samples for MS analysis by 50 for a total of 350 tumor samples. 




 


	
4.
	
Amendment to Exhibit A (Research Plan). Subsection (ii) (Targeted MS of Bluebird cell lines) under “Other Elements” is modified by increasing the number of cell lines for MS analysis by 10 for a total of 30 cell lines.




 


	
5.
	
Amendment to Section 5.1 (Patient Selection Services). Section 5.1 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety.  All references within the Agreement that relate to Patient Selection Services, including but not limited to the Patient Selection Services Agreement template set forth in Exhibit D shall be hereby deleted.




 


	
6. 
	
Entire Agreement. Except as expressly modified and amended hereby, the Agreement and its terms shall remain in full force and effect. 




 


	
7. 
	
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by electronic signatures in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement, binding on the Parties as if each has signed the same document.




 

 

 

[Signature Page Follows]




Page 1 of 2



 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be signed by their respective officers as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 


		
	
Gritstone Oncology, Inc.

 
	
Bluebird Bio, Inc.

	
 

By:/s/ Roman Yelensky
	
 

By: /s/ Teresa Jurgensen

	
 

Name:   Roman Yelensky
	
 

Name:  Teresa Jurgensen

	
 

Title: CTO
	
 

Title: VP, Chief Counsel, Oncology

	
 

Date: April 1, 2021
	
 

Date: April 26, 2021




 

 

 

[Signature Page to Amendment #3 to Agreement]

Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                             729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    407,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               491,245
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 491,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                     302,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   491,245
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (71,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   4,609
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,889)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gordon F. Burley, Chief Executive Officer of Terrace Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for
        the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    | /s/ Gordon F. Burley   
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | GORDON F. BURLEY       
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | July 29, 2005          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1997
<CASH>                                      73,730,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,255,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,377,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (3,421,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,502,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,340,000
<PP&E>                                     165,330,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (45,181,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             411,001,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,110,000
<BONDS>                                    200,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       135,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 160,161,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               411,001,000
<SALES>                                      7,663,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            75,709,000
<CGS>                                        9,073,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,301,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            36,478,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,061,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,276,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,345,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,931,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (3,842,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,911,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0           
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1304 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1304

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 1997

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                  For the relief of Belinda McGregor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Belinda 
McGregor shall be held and considered to have been selected for a 
diversity immigrant visa for fiscal year 1998 as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Belinda McGregor as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year the 
total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(c) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153 (c)).

            Passed the Senate November 8, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, James S. Osterman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: March 7, 2005                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ James S. Osterman                                     |   |
| James S. Osterman  President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cotton Ginning Research: Las Cruces, NM
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Las Cruces, New Mexico Cotton Ginning Research People & Locations







Russell W Gardner
                        Cotton Ginning Research

                        




                        
                        Machinist
                        Phone: (575) 526-6381
                        
                        
                        Fax: (575) 525-1076(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Roper *v.*Roberts *et al.,*executors.

Per Curiam.

1. The overruling of a ground of a motion for a new trial which complains that certain interrogatories were not executed by the two commissioners agreed upon, but which failed to show that written notice of the exception to their execution had been given as required by *129the Civil Code (1910), § 5904, or that the interrogatories had not been of file in the clerk’s office for more than twenty-four hours before the trial, furnishes no ground for reversal. *Rogers*v. *Truett,*73 *Ga.*386.

February 11, 1915.

Partition. Before Judge Patterson. -Cherokee superior court. December 6, 1913.

*Herbert Clay*and *Charles H. Griffin,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. G. Roberts*and *D. W. Blair,*contra.

2. “Admissions of one of the parties to the suit, given in evidence by the other, need not be referred to specially in charging the jury, where no request to do so is made by either party.” *Hawkins*v. *Kermode,*85 *Ga.*116 (11 S. E. 560).

3. There was no merit in any of the other grounds of the motion for a new trial. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*