alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grain Legume Genetics Physiology Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pullman, Washington Grain Legume Genetics Physiology Research People & Locations







Joanne  Holden
                        Grain Legume Genetics Physiology Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (509) 786-9255
                        
                        
                        Fax: (509) 786-9277(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA 

COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,

Respondents

v.

RICHIE E. SMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 65 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4

th day of January, 2024, the “King’s Bench Application; Petition 

for Extraordinary Relief” is DENIED. 

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
<PAGE>
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2003 of Hartford Life, Inc. (the "Company"), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as enacted by
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


                              /s/ Thomas M. Marra
                              ------------------------------------
                              Name:  Thomas M. Marra
                              Title: President and Chief Operating
                                     Officer
                              Date:  May 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hartford Life, Inc. and will be retained by Hartford Life, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Saul Cardenas, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered on April 5, 1984, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw ás counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur&emdash;Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Fein, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIS FROM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         704,217
<SECURITIES>                                    94,785
<RECEIVABLES>                                  168,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,448
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,009,543
<PP&E>                                          64,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,365,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          282,810
<BONDS>                                        561,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           379
<OTHER-SE>                                     499,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,365,847
<SALES>                                        189,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               339,703
<CGS>                                            8,278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  355,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   999
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,457
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,114)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### VILLAGE OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, Respondent, v. SARATOGA GAS, ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 27, 1907.)

In the complaint of trustees of the village of Saratoga Springs against the Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Company.

PER CURIAM.

Application for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified, which, in the opinion of this court, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals, to wit: “Has there been any invasion of the defendant’s constitutional rights in or by the order appealed from?”
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Soil Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl P.
Ranno, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno
-----------------------------------
Carl P. Ranno,
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF

PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA

COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,

Respondents

v.

RICHIE E. SMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 65 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of January , 202 4

, the “King’s Bench Application; Petition

for Extraordinary Relief” is DENIED.

Justice McCaff er y did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 304 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 304

    Supporting ``Lights On Afterschool'', a national celebration of 
                         afterschool programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 21 (legislative day, October 20), 2011

Mrs. Boxer (for herself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. 
Casey, and Ms. Stabenow) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting ``Lights On Afterschool'', a national celebration of 
                         afterschool programs.

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs provide safe, challenging, engaging, 
        and fun learning experiences that help children and youth develop 
        social, emotional, physical, cultural, and academic skills;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs support working families by ensuring 
        that the children in those families are safe and productive after the 
        regular school day ends;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs build stronger communities by 
        involving students, parents, business leaders, and adult volunteers in 
        the lives of children in the United States, thereby promoting positive 
        relationships among children, youth, families, and adults;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs engage families, schools, and diverse 
        community partners in advancing the well-being of children in the United 
        States;
Whereas ``Lights On Afterschool'', a national celebration of afterschool 
        programs held on October 20, 2011, highlights the critical importance of 
        high-quality afterschool programs in the lives of children, their 
        families, and their communities;
Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States have parents who work 
        outside the home and approximately 15,100,000 children in the United 
        States have no place to go after school; and
Whereas many afterschool programs across the United States are struggling to 
        keep their doors open and their lights on: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and ideals of ``Lights 
On Afterschool'', a national celebration of afterschool programs.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 18, 2013

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

IN RE: ] Petition for Writ of

 KEVIN TRUDEAU, Petitioner. ] Mandamus from the Northern

 ] District of Illinois,

No. 13-3055 ] Eastern Division.

 ] 

 ] No. 1:03-cv-03904

 ] 

 ] Robert W. Gettleman,

 ] Judge.

The following is before the court: EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, filed on

September 18, 2013, by counsel for the petitioner.

IT IS ORDERED that petition for writ of mandamus, or in the alternative, a writ of

habeas corpus is DENIED. 

Case: 13-3055 Document: 4 Filed: 09/18/2013 Pages: 1
# Official Journal L 177/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 177 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 654 July 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 177

English edition

Legislation

Volume 654 July 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1103 of 28 June 2022 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1104 of 1 July 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2022/1105 of 15 June 2022 on the acceptance of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam’s contribution to the European Union CSDP Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) (EUTM RCA/2/2022) | 75 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1103 of 28 June 2022 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1104 of 1 July 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials (
  1
  )

1

4

DECISIONS

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2022/1105 of 15 June 2022 on the acceptance of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam’s contribution to the European Union CSDP Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) (EUTM RCA/2/2022)

75

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:916
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 2 of 15 PageID #:917
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 3 of 15 PageID #:918
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 4 of 15 PageID #:919
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 5 of 15 PageID #:920
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 6 of 15 PageID #:921
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 7 of 15 PageID #:922
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 8 of 15 PageID #:923
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 9 of 15 PageID #:924
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 10 of 15 PageID #:925
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 11 of 15 PageID #:926
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 12 of 15 PageID #:927
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 13 of 15 PageID #:928
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 14 of 15 PageID #:929
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 101 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 15 of 15 PageID #:930
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul ZIMMERMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6296.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 9, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 26, 2011.

Paul Zimmerman, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Zimmerman, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Zimmerman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
SEVENTH CIRCUIT TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION SHEET

PART I - Must be completed by party or party's attorney pursuant to Rule 10(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and
Rule 11(a) of the Circuit Rules. The appellant must file this form with the court reporter within 14 days of filing the notice of appeal,
whether transcript is being ordered or not. (FRAP 10(b)(1)) Satisfactory arrangements with the court reporter for payment of the
costs of the transcripts must also be made at that time. (FRAP 10(b)(4)) (Note: Appellees as well as appellants are expected to
use this form when ordering transcripts.)

Short Title District D.C. Docket No.
. N.D. Illinois 03-CV-3904
Federal Trade Commission v. Trudeau
District Judge Court Reporter
Judge Robert Gettleman Jennifer Costales

v (am ordering transcript.
CI | am not ordering transcript because:

Sign below and return original and one copy to court reporter.
Distribute remaining copies to the Clerk of the District Court

and opposing party, retaining one copy for yourself.

OO The transcript has been prepared.

Indicate proceedings for which transcript is required. Dates must be provided:
Vv] Pretrial proceedings. Specify: Motion Hearings Regarding Bankruptcy Stay

O

Trial or Hearing. Specify:

Date(s)
4125113; 4/26/13

Voir Dire

Opening statement

Instruction conference

FILED

Closing statements

MA

Court instructions

MAY 1 4 2013
Moy 4 IB

THOMAS G BRUTON
CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT

Post-trial proceedings. Specify:

Sentencing

OOOOOO00

Other proceedings. Specify:

im C.J.A. Voucher
[¥] No Payment Yet

Method of Payment. [_]| cash [J check or Money Order
Status of Payment: Oo Full Payment oO Partial Payment

Signature: Telephone No, 312-558-3209

Address:

4.
Pa os er
Wirfston & Strawn LLP, 35 W. Wackér Drive, Chicago, IL 60601

Date: 5/10/13

PART II — Must be completed by Court Reporter pursuant to Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. By signing

this Part Il, the Court Reporter certifies that satisfactory arrangements for payment have been made.
Estimated Completion Date

U.S.C.A. Docket No. Date Order Received

$-137/2

Esti Length
e-13-1%| YOme
Signature of Court Reporter: si Y ( / Date: S| 2 -13

NOTICE: The Judicial Conference/of fhe untod tates, by its resolution of March 11, 1982, has provided that a penalty of 10
Percent must apply, unless a waiver‘is granted by the Court of Appeals’ Clerk, when a “transcript of a case on appeal is not
delivered within 30 days of the date ordered and payment received therefor.” The penalty is 20 percent for transcript not delivered
within 60 days.

Original to Court Reporter. Copies to: @ U.S.C.A. Clerk @ Service Copy @ District Court Clerk and to @ Party / Counsel
Ordering Transcript.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Subtropical Insects and Horticulture Research: Fort Pierce, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Invasive Pests
                        Mealybugs
                                    Scale Insects
                                    WhiteflySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory Subtropical Insects and Horticulture Research People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

Joseph M Patt

(Joe)    Research Entomologist Joseph Patt, Ph.D Research Entomologist  U. S. Horticultural Research Laboratory2001 South Rock RoadFort Pierce, FL 34945Telephone: (772) 462-5921Fax: (772) 462-5986Email: Joseph.Patt@ars.usda.gov Dr. Patt conducts research on insect behavior and ecology.  He uses this information to develop sustainable control measures for insect pests of citrus and other subtropical orchard crops.  Current focus includes the development of bioassays to measure the behavioral responses of Asian citrus psyllid to scent attractants and repellents.  Recent advances include discovery of novel synthetic aromatics that will improve our ability to detect, monitor, and control this important pest.  Joseph Patt Joseph Patt Presentation


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stanley J. Lewicki,

Judgment unanimously afirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Dillon, J.—attempted burglary, third degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.