alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128910 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, DEBORAH TUCKER, Personal Representative Justices 

of the Estate of JAMIE LYNN JENKINS,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 128910 

 COA: 251771 

Jackson CC: 01-003518-NZ 

MEIJER, INC. and GLENN MEYERS,

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

WENDY ADAMS, TOM TINKLEPAUGH,

LAURIE JACOBS, JOHN DOE, employees and 

agents, and JANE DOE, employees and agents, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
EXHIBIT 11
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earningsper share:           (Expressed in U.S. Currency)            Three months ended March 31,   2005  2004 Numerator:        Net Income $398,714  $246,379 Dividends on Series A preferred stock  (763)  (770)Dividends on Series C preferred stock  —   (5,838)                Numerator for basic and diluted earnings pershare earnings available to common shareholders $397,951  $239,771                 Denominator:        Denominator for basic earnings per share-weighted average shares outstanding  13,811,849   11,242,663 Effect of dilutive securities  375,000   1,223,024 Warrants  304,132   952,784                 Dilutive potential common shares denominatorfor diluted earnings per share adjustedweighter-average shares and assumed conversion  14,490,981   13,418,471                 Basic earnings per share $0.03  $0.02                 Diluted earnings per share $0.03  $0.02
Amendment to the By-Laws of Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc.

Pursuant to a resolution of the Company's Board of Directors dated January 21,
2003, Section 1 of Article IV of the Company's By-Laws was amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

          "SECTION 1 Number. The principal Officers of the Corporation shall be
     a Chairman of the Board, a President, a Vice-President, and a Secretary,
     each of whom shall be elected by the Board of Directors. Such other
     officers and assistant officers as may be deemed necessary may be elected
     or appointed by the Board of Directors. Any two or more offices may be held
     by the same person, except the offices of President and Secretary and the
     offices of President and Vice-President."

Pursuant to a resolution of the Company's Board of Directors dated January 21,
2003, Section 5 of Article IV of the Company's By-Laws was amended to read in
its entirety as follows (with the existing sections of Article IV of the
Company's Bylaws renumbered as appropriate):

          "SECTION 5 Chairman of the Board. The Chairman of the Board, if one be
     chosen by the Board of Directors, shall preside at all meetings of the
     Board of Directors and of the shareholders and shall perform all duties
     incident to the office of the Chairman of the Board of the corporation and
     such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors from time
     to time."
Case 1:03-cv-00683   Document 1    Filed 01/30/03   Page 1 of 8

Case 1:03-cv-00683   Document 1    Filed 01/30/03   Page 2 of 8

Case 1:03-cv-00683   Document 1    Filed 01/30/03   Page 3 of 8

Case 1:03-cv-00683   Document 1    Filed 01/30/03   Page 4 of 8

Case 1:03-cv-00683   Document 1    Filed 01/30/03   Page 5 of 8

Case 1:03-cv-00683   Document 1    Filed 01/30/03   Page 6 of 8

Case 1:03-cv-00683   Document 1    Filed 01/30/03   Page 7 of 8

Case 1:03-cv-00683   Document 1    Filed 01/30/03   Page 8 of 8
Exhibit
32.3




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry J. White,
Jr., Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:  May
      7, 2008
            /s/ HARRY J. WHITE, JR.Harry
      J. White, Jr.Chief
      Accounting Officer
#### Dickenson & Williams *v.*Barwick, trustee, *et al.*

March 9, 1915.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Cox. Decatur superior court. July 6, 1914. l

*W. V. Ouster,*for plaintiffs.

Lumpkin, J.

There was no error in denying an interlocutory, injunction in this ease.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*'AU the Justices concwr, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sugarcane Field Station: Canal Point, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Canal Point, Florida Sugarcane Field Station People & Locations







Daniel T Bell
                        Sugarcane Field Station

                        




                        
                        Automotive Worker
                        Phone: (561) 924-5227
                         ext. 31
                        
                        Fax: (561) 924-6109(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1179 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1179

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 21, 1998

      Referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to reauthorize the 
                   National Flood Insurance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance 
Reauthorization Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 1319 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 
4026) is amended by striking ``September 30, 1997'' and inserting 
``September 30, 2002''.

            Passed the Senate October 1, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1354

AN ACT

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for

the designation of common carriers not subject to the

jurisdiction of a State commission as eligible telecommunications carriers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1354 ES

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF

2 1934.

3 Section 214(e) of the Communications Act of 1934

4 (47 U.S.C. 214(e)) is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(2) or (3)’’ in paragraph (1)

6 and inserting ‘‘(2), (3), or (6)’’;

7 (2) by striking ‘‘interstate services,’’ in para8 graph (3) and inserting ‘‘interstate services or an

9 area served by a common carrier to which paragraph

10 (6) applies,’’;

11 (3) by inserting ‘‘(or the Commission in the

12 case of a common carrier designated under para13 graph (6))’’ in paragraph (4) after ‘‘State commis14 sion’’ each place such term appears;

15 (4) by inserting ‘‘(or the Commission under

16 paragraph (6))’’ in paragraph (5) after ‘‘State com17 mission’’; and

18 (5) by inserting after paragraph (5) the follow19 ing:

20 ‘‘(6) COMMON CARRIERS NOT SUBJECT TO

21 STATE COMMISSION JURISDICTION.—In the case of a

22 common carrier providing telephone exchange service

23 and exchange access that is not subject to the juris24 diction of a State commission, the Commission shall

25 upon request designate such a common carrier that

26 meets the requirements of paragraph (1) as an eligi-
3

S 1354 ES

1 ble telecommunications carrier for a service area

2 designated by the Commission consistent with appli3 cable federal and State law. Upon request and con4 sistent with the public interest, convenience and ne5 cessity, the Commission may, with respect to an area

6 served by a rural telephone company, and shall, in

7 the case of all other areas, designate more than one

8 common carrier as an eligible telecommunications

9 carrier for a service area designated under this para10 graph, so long as each additional requesting carrier

11 meets the requirements of paragraph (1). Before

12 designating an additional eligible telecommunications

13 carrier for an area served by a rural telephone com14 pany, the Commission shall find that the designation

15 is in the public interest.’’.

Passed the Senate November 9, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1354

AN ACT

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to proas eligible telecommunications carriers. subject to the jurisdiction of a State commission vide for the designation of common carriers not
# Official Journal L 45/20 F

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 45 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5120 February 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 45

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5120 February 2008

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2008/126/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 20 December 2006 on the aid to ‘Investbx’ C 36/2005 which the United Kingdom is planning to implement
  (notified under document number C(2006) 5808)

   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2008/126/EC

*

Commission Decision of 20 December 2006 on the aid to ‘Investbx’ C 36/2005 which the United Kingdom is planning to implement
  (notified under document number C(2006) 5808)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2006) 5808)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case 1:02-cv-00824 Document 24 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:02-cv-00824 Document 24 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:02-cv-00824 Document 24 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:02-cv-00824 Document 24 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:02-cv-00824 Document 24 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:02-cv-00824 Document 24 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:02-cv-00824 Document 24 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:02-cv-00824 Document 24 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:02-cv-00824 Document 24 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 9 of 9
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Wisler, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McMahon, J.), rendered December 10, 1982, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which *680could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-80065, 333-06563, 333-114151, 333-35651, 333-28929, 333-28927
and 333-71913) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-16767,
333-26293 and 333-61585), respectively, of our report dated January 29, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Secure
Computing Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1998.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 1999
Case: 1:02-cv-01992 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/18/02 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cv-01992 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/18/02 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:2
Case: 1:02-cv-01992 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/18/02 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:3
Case: 1:02-cv-01992 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/18/02 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:4
Case: 1:02-cv-01992 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/18/02 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:5
Case: 1:02-cv-01992 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/18/02 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:6
Case: 1:02-cv-01992 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/18/02 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:7
Case: 1:02-cv-01992 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/18/02 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:8
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00442-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.R.W., a Child

Appeal from the 314th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2013-02967J)

TO THE 314TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 26th day of November 2014, the case upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on May 27, 2014. After submitting the case on 

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the 

parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains 

no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered November 26, 2014.

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp. Opinion 

delivered by Justice Sharp.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

February 6, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1172

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1998

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Sylvester Flis.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1172 RFH

1 SECTION 1. GRANT OF NATURALIZATION TO SYLVESTER

2 FLIS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, Sylvester Flis shall be naturalized as a citizen

5 of the United States upon the filing of the appropriate

6 application and upon being administered the oath of re7 nunciation and allegiance in an appropriate ceremony pur8 suant to section 337 of the Immigration and Nationality

9 Act.

10 (b) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsection (a) shall apply only if the application

12 for naturalization is filed with appropriate fees within 1

13 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the Senate November 13, 1997.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2004 (the "Report"), I, John E.
Gherty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        By /s/ John E. Gherty
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John E. Gherty
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Walter Adelman, Petitioner, v Michael A. Gary, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 878] —

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Michael A. Gary, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to vacate a sentence imposed by the same court (Greenberg, J.) *on*August 22, 1988, and to resentence the petitioner, or to reconsider the petitioner’s prior motion pursuant to CPL 440.20, which was denied by the respondent, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought *(see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman,*53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Angiolillo, J.P., Belen, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

[PRAECIS LETTERHEAD]

 

 

March 29, 2004

 

 

Mr. William K. Heiden

10 Livingston Road

Wellesley, MA  02482

 

Dear Bill:

 

In accordance with our recentdiscussions, this letter will serve to amend the letter agreement, dated as ofMay 9, 2002, between PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED (the “Company”) andyou (the “Original Letter Agreement”) as provided herein.  Capitalized terms used but not definedherein shall have the meanings given to them in the Original Letter Agreement.

 

From and after the date hereof,you acknowledge and agree that (i) any options to purchase shares of commonstock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company granted to you under theCompany’s Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Plan (as it may be amendedfrom time to time) shall automatically become fully vested and exercisable uponthe termination of your employment with the Company upon or after a Change ofControl if such termination would entitle you to a lump sum payment pursuant tothe terms of the Original Letter Agreement as set forth under the caption“Change of Control Severance Benefits”, (ii) immediately upon a Change ofControl, the section of each Stock Option Agreement entered into between youand the Company captioned “No Exercise of Option if Employment Terminated forMisconduct” shall automatically cease to be of any force or effect and,accordingly, no termination of your employment with the Company after a Changeof Control will be, or will be deemed to be, a termination for “Misconduct” forpurposes of any Stock Option Agreement and (iii) any Stock Option Agreemententered into between you and the Company after the date hereof will includeprovisions to the effect provided in clauses (i) and (ii) of thissentence.  Accordingly, the fourth andfifth sentences of the section of the Original Letter Agreement captioned“Stock Options”, to the extent such sentences refer to future grants of stockoptions, are amended as provided herein and shall be of no further force oreffect.  All other provisions of the OriginalLetter Agreement are not changed hereby and shall remain in full force andeffect.

 

----

 

Please indicate your agreement with and acceptance of the foregoing bysigning and returning the enclosed duplicate copy of this letter to Mary BethDeLena, Vice President, Legal.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS

INCORPORATED

 

 
| By:                   | /s/ Malcolm L. Gefter, Ph.D. |   |
|-----------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Malcolm L. Gefter, Ph.D.     |
|                  | Chairman of the Board and    |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer      |
|                  |                         |
|                  |                         |
| Agreed and Accepted:  |
|                  |                         |
|                  |                         |
| /s/ William K. Heiden |                         |
| William K. Heiden     |
|                  |                         |
| Date:                 | March 29, 2003          |   |
|                       |                              |        |  |  |  |

 

----