alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 99


                                  CERTIFICATION



      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of CVF
Technologies Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2002 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:     November 14, 2002                      /s/ Jeffrey I. Dreben
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Jeffrey I. Dreben,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer




Dated:     November 14, 2002                      /s/ Robert L. Miller
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Robert L. Miller,
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
#### XING NIEN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-74996.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 22, 2011.

Xing Nien, Monterey, CA, pro se.

OIL, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Stuart Nickum, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Xing Nien, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the *960agency’s factual findings and review de novo its legal conclusions. *Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that, even if credible, Nien failed to establish his receipt of a government summons and his encounter with the police constitute past persecution. *See Gu v. Gonzales,*454 F.3d 1014, 1019-21 (9th Cir.2006) (brief detention, beating and interrogation by police did not compel a finding of past persecution by Chinese police). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that Nien failed to establish an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution on account of his religion. *See Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir.2003); *Ladha v. INS,*215 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir.2000) (petitioner must provide credible, direct, and specific evidence in the record of facts that would support a reasonable fear of persecution). The court lacks jurisdiction to consider Nien’s claim that he is eligible for asylum and withholding of removal on account of his smuggling activities because, to the BIA, Nien only raised the smuggling issue with respect to his CAT claim. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, his asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

Lastly, substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Nien has failed to establish a clear probability of torture by or with the acquiescence of the Chinese government if he returns to China. *See Waklcary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1068 (9th Cir.2009) (petitioner did not offer evidence that he was likely to be tortured).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary Stern, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/    Gary Stern                     |  | 
|Gary Stern                            |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

Dated: January 28, 2013

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the 10-K/A as a separate disclosure statement.
1 ... S eeTex. R. A pp. P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 17 8- CV J O AN NA K ANU I , I NDI VI DUA L L Y, A P P E L L ANT A N D A S N EX T FRI EN D O F KYLE I GH ROBERTS V. TEX A S D EPA RTM EN T O F FAM I LY APPELLEES AND PR OTE CTI VE SE RVI CE S B Y A N D T H R O U G H C A R E Y C O C K E R E L L , IN H IS O F F IC IA LC A P A C IT Y ; S T A C I M . L OVE , CH R I S T I N H . I VE Y, R E GE NA R OB I NS ON, AL F R E D F R E E M AN, R E GI NA H A R R I S , A N D V ER O N I C A TE R R ELL I N TH EI R I N D I V I D U A L A N D O FFI C I A L C A PA C I TI ES

----- -----

FR O M THE 4 8TH DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W e h a v e c o n s id e r e d a p p e lla n t ’s “ M o t io n F o r V o lu n t a r y D is m is s a l.” Itis t he cou rt ’ s opi ni on t hatt he m ot i on s houl d begr ant ed; t her ef or e, w e d i sm i sst he
a p p e a l . S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .1 (a )(1 ), 4 3 .2 (f).2

C os t s oft he app ea l s hal l bep ai d by ap pel l ant , f orw hi ch l etex ec ut i on i s s u e . S ee Tex. R. A pp. P. 43. 4. P E R CU R I AM P A N E L : M E IE R , J .; C A Y C E , C .J .; a n d L IV IN G S T O N , J . DEL I VERE D: J ul y 9, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, August 11, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

# Place:

                        Virtual Meeting.                         *Note:*                         Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the meeting, see the instructions below.                    

# STATUS:

                        This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual meeting, go to the Commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2021-08: Congressman Scott Fitzgerald, Management and Administrative Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

*Authority:*                         Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Laura E. Sinram,

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-16932 Filed 8-4-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

2970-7528 QUEBEC, INC., a corporation of the )

Canadian Province of Quebec, d/b/a AUTO H. )

GREGOIRE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) 03 C 7210

)

OWL ENTERPRISES, INC., and PETER LAGIOS )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES P. KOCORAS, Chief District Judge:

This matter comes before the court on Defendant’s, Peter Lagios (“Lagios”),

Petition to Strike and Dismiss Lagios as a Party Defendant. For the reasons set forth

below, the Petition is denied.

Lagios fails to supply the applicable procedural rule under which he brings the

instant petition; however, motions to strike are provided for pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

Proc. 12(f). Rule 12(f) allows us on our “own initiative, at any time, to order stricken

from any pleading any insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent,

or scandalous matter.” Generally, Rule 12(f) motions are brought to attack the pleadings
-2-

and are disfavored because of their tendency to delay the proceedings. Heller Financial

v. Midwhey Powder Co., Inc., 883 F.2d 1286, 1294 (7th Cir. 1989).

After reviewing Lagios’ Petition, it is evident that he is disputing the propriety of

his involvement in the dispute and not the redundant, impertinent, or scandalous nature

of the pleadings as they relate to him. He attaches a number of exhibits, outside the

pleadings, to the instant petition to support his arguments. A factual inquiry, such as the

one requested, would require us to make improper determinations under the present

Petition. Such an inquiry would be proper if made pursuant to a motion for summary

judgment.

Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, a party moving for summary judgment is required

to file “a statement of material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no

genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law.” Lagios

has yet to submit such a statement, and it is premature to do so. Therefore, despite his

request for summary judgment, we are unwilling to address the Petition as such without

the required 56.1 statement. Consequently, Lagios’ Petition is denied without prejudice.

 

Charles P. Kocoras

Chief Judge

United States District Court

Dated: February 13, 2006
H. Res. 88

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 11, 1997.

Resolved, That

Attest:

Clerk.
AO 450(Rev. 5/85)Judgment in a Civil Case

United States District Court

Northern District of Illinois

Eastern Division

DAVID BOURKE JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v. Case Number: 03 C 7749

SCOTT CONGER, et al

G Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury rendered its verdict.

O Decision by Court. This action came to hearing before the Court. The issues have

been heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that summary judgment is entered in favor of

defendants Scott Conger and Wayne E. Brucar and against plaintiff David Bourke. All other

claims are dismissed with prejudice and without costs pursuant to stipulation.

Michael W. Dobbins, Clerk of Court

Date: 10/26/2009 ________________________________

/s/ Donald Walker, Deputy Clerk

Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 88 Filed 10/26/09 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003 of Hartford Life, Inc. (the "Company"), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as enacted by
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                      /s/ Lizabeth H. Zlatkus
                      -----------------------
                      Name: Lizabeth H. Zlatkus
                      Title:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                      Date: August 6, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hartford Life, Inc. and will be
retained by Hartford Life, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |    /s/  Daniel      R. Baty |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel      R. Baty                                  |
|   | Co-Chief      Executive Officer                      |
|   | March      16, 2009                                  |
# Official Journal C 43/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.043.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 43 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5319 February 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.043.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 43

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5319 February 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 043/01 | List and description of methods of analysis referred to in the first paragraph of Article 120g of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (published in accordance with Article 15(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 of 10 July 2009
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 043/01

List and description of methods of analysis referred to in the first paragraph of Article 120g of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (published in accordance with Article 15(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 of 10 July 2009
  )

(published in accordance with Article 15(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 of 10 July 2009

)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# 5.__6.,(

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23

- 19 SUSAN JOHNSON, DAVE JOHNSON, KATHY RICH, SUSAN HINKINS, RICHARD GILLETTE, LINDA FULLER, LARRY JENT, JULIE JENT, RICHARD J. CHARRON, KRISTIN CHARRON,

Plaintiffs and Appellee,

v. ALPHA SIGMA PHI (MONTANA ) STATE UNIVERSITY CHAPTER), and CITY OF BOZEMAN,

Defendants and Appellants. 

## THIRD ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

MICHAEL SAN SOUCI , the mediator previously appointed in this matter, is retired

. Accordingly, Mr. San Souci ’s order of mediator appointment is hereby rescinded and IT IS ORDERED THAT **, ANNA WILLIAMS**  **,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as me diators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) sh all run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this 3 0 th day of November , 2023.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Elizabeth Worth Lund Brian Gallik James Goetz Henry Tsar Alpha Sigma Phi (Montana Chapter) 11/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0619
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Peter Maloney, Chief Financial Officer of Keynote Systems, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2005 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 9, 2005



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Peter Maloney                                                                 
|Peter Maloney Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Keynote Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



42
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 29, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50568 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS FERNANDO DIAZ-SALAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP–02-CR-1961-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Fernando Diaz-Salas appeals his jury trial convictions for importation of more that 100 kilograms of marijuana and possession with intent to deliver more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. Diaz argues on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to show that he had knowledge that the marijuana was in a hidden compartment in the trailer he was towing and that theNo. 03-50568 -2- district court erred in instructing the jury on deliberate ignorance. There was testimony that Diaz suspected that the trailer might contain drugs, that he never requested an X-ray, that Diaz had looked inside the trailer before approaching the border and that the alterations were obvious to the inspecting officer, that Dias was hesitant in answering the X-ray inspector’s questions, and that the trailer contained marijuana worth at least $1,000,000. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and accepting the jury’s credibility determinations, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support Diaz’s convictions. See United States v. Chavez , 119 F.3d 342, 347 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Loe , 262 F.3d 427, 432 (5th Cir. 2001). The evidence at trial raised the inferences necessary to support the district court’s decision to instruct the jury on deliberate ignorance. See United States v. Lara-Velasquez , 919 F.2d 946, 951 (5th Cir. 1990).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street
Properties Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Barbara J. Corinha, Vice President, Chief Operating
Officer (equivalent of Chief Financial Officer), Treasurer and Secretary of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

            (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.


Dated: November 12, 2003               /s/ Barbara J. Corinha
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Barbara J. Corinha
                                       Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
                                       (equivalent of Chief Financial Officer),
                                       Treasurer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Franklin Street Properties Corp. and will be retained by Franklin
Street Properties Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.