alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Principal Financial
Officer

Pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)



I, Paul Buck, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A
of CNS Response, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2012;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report.





|Dated: January 28, 2013 | /s/ Paul Buck                
|----------------------- | -----------------------------
|                        | Name:Paul Buck               
|                        | Title:Chief Financial Officer
#### Walker Roofing Company *v.*Clark.

Lumpkin, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant on an open account for $258.53 principal. The defendant pleaded that he owed only $78. The jury found for the plaintiff the latter amount. The plaintiff moved for a new trial. The presiding judge decided that there had been a miscalculation by which the verdict was for $10.40 too little. He ordered *764that if the defendant or any one for him should on a certain day tender that amount, with interest, to the plaintiff, a new trial he refused; and if not, that a new trial be granted. *Held,*that the presiding judge ruled in effect that the verdict was erroneous to the extent of $10.40, and refused a new trial only on the condition mentioned. Where a new trial is granted or refused upon a condition of the character indicated above, it should be one the performance or non-performance of which will appear of record; and the grant or refusal of a new trial should not be made to depend on a tender by the defendant,' or any one for him, of an amount “exclusive of the amount of the verdict and cost,” so that the fulfillment or non-fulfillment of the requirement, and accordingly the grant or refusal of a new trial, will depend upon parol, and possibly conflicting, evidence.

July 21, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Reid. Newton superior court. January 31, 1914.

*G. G.*King, for plaintiff. *Rogers & Knox,*for defendant. • .

*(a)*Under the circumstances stated, and in the light of the evidence, this court will reverse the judgment, so that a new trial may be had.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000385

04-MAR-2020

08:31 AM
#### Fox *v.*Smith.

June 19, 1915.

Lien foreclosure. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. March 5, 1914.

*George B. Bush,*for plaintiff in error. •

*Fvins, Spence & Moore,*contra..

Atkinson, J.

1. “All mechanics of every sort, for work done and material furnished in manufacturing or repairing personal property, shall have a special lien on the same.” Civil Code, § 3354. The lien so provided for is afforded to mechanics, notwithstanding the work employed in manufacturing or repairing the property may have been performed entirety by an employee of the mechanic. *Quillian*v. *Central Railroad*&c. *Co.,*52 *Ga.*374. See also *Bruton*& *Wade*v. *Beasley,*135 *Ga.*412 (69 S. E. 561).

(o) Accordingly, a flfm engaged in operating a repair-shop where others are employed to do expert-mechanical work, and where material is furnished for the repair of carriages and automobiles, is entitled to a lien-on the property manufactured or improved.

2. The above rulings dispose of the only question raised by the bill of exceptions. ■ *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



Board of Directors and Shareholders
Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc.

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
Ridgestone Financial Services, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-28299 and File No.
333-52323)  of  our  report  dated  January  29,  1999,  on  our  audit  of  the
consolidated  financial  statements for the year ended December 31, 1998,  which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

                                       VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP

                                       /s/ Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP

Brookfield, Wisconsin
March 16, 1999
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)            The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Blount International, Inc. andwill be retained by Blount International, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date: March10, 2006

 

 
| /s/ Calvin E. Jenness      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Calvin  E. Jenness         |   |
| Senior  Vice President and |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer   |   |

 

 

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of OYO Geospace Corporation:

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-40893 and 333-80003) of OYO Geospace
Corporation of our report dated November 9, 2000 relating to the financial
statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 9, 2000 relating to
the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

                                          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

December 11, 2000
Houston, Texas
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1090 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1090

 To specify that States may waive requirements relating to commercial 
 driver's licenses under chapter 313 of title 49, United States Code, 
     with respect to certain farm vehicles, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 1997

 Mr. Burns (for himself Mr. Johnson, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
   Brownback, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Helms, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Cochran, Mr. 
Hatch, Mr. Inhofe, and Mr. Conrad) introduced the following bill; which 
was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To specify that States may waive requirements relating to commercial 
 driver's licenses under chapter 313 of title 49, United States Code, 
     with respect to certain farm vehicles, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVERS FOR CERTAIN FARM VEHICLES.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Custom harvesting farm machinery.--The term ``custom 
        harvesting farm machinery'' includes vehicles used for custom 
        harvesting that--
                    (A) are classified under subpart F of part 383, of 
                title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, as being 
                included in Group A, B, or C (as those terms are used 
                in section 383.91 of that part); and
                    (B) are used on a seasonal basis to provide 
                transportation of--
                            (i) agricultural commodities from field to 
                        storage or processing; and
                            (ii) harvesting machinery and equipment 
                        from farm to farm.
            (2) Commercial driver's license.--The term ``commercial 
        driver's license'' has the meaning given that term in section 
        31301(3) of title 49, United States Code.
    (b) Waivers.--In addition to the authority granted to States to 
waive the application of chapter 313 of title 49, United States Code, 
with respect to farm vehicles described in 53 Fed Reg. 37313 through 
37316 and farm-related service industries described in 57 Fed. Reg. 
13650 through 13654, each State that issues commercial drivers' 
licenses in accordance with chapter 313 of title 49, United States 
Code, may waive the application of any requirement for obtaining a 
commercial driver's license for operators of custom harvesting farm 
machinery or employees of farm-related service industries (or both) 
that would otherwise apply.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 538 -CV

Re ne e Yv onne Wr igh t , A ppe lla nt

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s , Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF B ELL COUNTY , 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 219, 266- B , HO NORAB LE RICKMO RRIS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N This is an appea l from an or der te rminatingthe par ental rights of Renee Yvonne Wright to he r minor children. Wright’s court-a ppointed counsel has f

i l ed an An de rs brief c ontaining a profe ssional e valuation of the rec ord and demonstratingthat there are no arguable grounds to be adva nced on a ppeal. Se e An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 73 8 , 7 4 4 (1 967). The brie f mee ts the require ments of An de rs . Se eTay lor v . Te x as De p’ t of Prote c tiv e &Re

gu lator y Se rv s. , 1 6 0 S
. W
. 3 d

6 4 1 , 6 4 6 -4 7 (T ex . Ap p . — Au s t i n2 0 0 5 , p et . d en i ed ) ( ap p l yi n g An de rs proce dure in a pp e a l f ro m te rm ina

tio n o f p are nta l r ig hts ). Couns e l c on c lud e s th at th e a pp e a l is wi tho ut m e ri t and has f iled a motion to withdraw. Co u n s el h as provided Wrig ht with copies of the br ief, the motion, and the r ecor d, and has notified Wrig ht of her r ight to file a pro s e brie f. More than thirty day s have pa ssed, and no pro se br ief ha s been f iled.We have rec eived a letter from Wright requesting that this Court provide her the cha nce 1 to retain he r par ental rights. H oweve r, our revie w is confined to whe ther Wrig ht has shown that the district court committed an error warr anting reve rsal of the judgme nt. See M itchell v. Texas D ep’t of F am ily &Prote c tiv e Se rv

s. , No
. 0 3 -0 7 -00348-CV, 2008 Te x . App. L EXI S 3574, at *5 (Tex. App.—Austin May 15, 2008, no pet. h.)(mem. op.). Wright’s letter does not show that, base d on the totality of the re cord, the trial court c ommitt ed any reve rsible er

ror in ter minating he r par ental rig hts. See id.; see also Holley v. Adams , 544 S.W .2d 367, 370-372 (Te x . 1976).

2 After revie wingthe re cord, w e have found nothingthat woul d ar gu ably support an appe al, and we ag ree that the appe al is frivol o u s an d wi t h o u t merit. Se e An de rs , 386 U.S. at 74 1- 44 ; Taylor , 1 6 0 S.W .3d at 646-47. We there fore aff irm the district court’s or der a nd g rant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 1

_______________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: August 15, 2008
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John J. Flavio, Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Keynote Systems, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2003 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 14, 2003





/s/    JOHN
FLAVIO



John Flavio



Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer



(Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Keynote Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-20-1997
<CASH>                                               0               7,860,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0              35,936,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0              13,122,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                 477,300
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0              66,409,300
<PP&E>                                               0               8,537,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               6,975,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              75,073,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0              20,017,300
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0               1,423,600
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              49,062,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              75,073,700
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,236,700              61,821,500
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,961,500              43,453,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,865,200               8,205,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (21,800)                 95,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             287,500                 182,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,305,100              10,646,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   215,000               6,503,200<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,090,100               4,143,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,090,100               4,143,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47                     .30<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47                     .30<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Including $4.5 million deferred tax liability related to C-Corporation
Conversion.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. AP -76,876
EX P ARTE SHAD ST . IVES COL EMAN, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 05-1254-K 277A IN THE 277 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and sente nced to nine y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his plea was i n v o l u ntary beca use the plea ag ree ment cannot be followed. Applicant’s p l ea ag ree ment aff irmatively stated that this sentenc e was to be running
concur rently with his feder al sentenc e. The trial court deter

mined that Applicant pled g uilty pursuant t o an ag ree ment that this2

sentenc e would run concur rently with a fed er al s en t en ce. Both the trial court and the State
rec ommend that this Court g rant relief
. We ag ree . Applicant is entitled to relief
. Ex parte Huerta , 692 S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 05-1254-K277A in the 277 District Court of t h Wil liamson County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to th e custody of the Sheriff of Wil liamson County to answe r the char g e as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any
nece ssary bench w arr ant within 10 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copi e s o f th is o p in io n s h a ll be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: September

12, 2012 Do not publish
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with this Amendment
No. 3 to the Annual Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David A. Owen, Chief Financial
Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.




Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:




(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc.
and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ David A.
    OwenDavid A.
      OwenChief
      Financial OfficerDecember
      29, 2009






109
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert B. Ladd, President and Chief Executive Officer of
MGT Capital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)    the Amendment to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K(A) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012, (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)    the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               | By:                                                                | /s/ ROBERT B. LADD
|-------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------
|               | Robert B. Ladd                                                    
|               | President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|               |                                                                   
|April 30, 2013 |
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7110** 

KEVIN JACKSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant , and

EMERY FLOREZ , Plaintiff ,

v.
RICK FOXWELL, Warden; MARTIN O’MALLEY; GARY D. MAYNARD; HOWARD RAY, JR. , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv
- 02450

- RDB )

Submitted : December 31, 2014 Decided: January 6, 2015

Before KING, SHEDD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kevin Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Tamal Ajani Banton, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kevin Jackson appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Jackson v. Foxwell , No. 1:13

- cv
- 02450

- RDB (D. Md. July
17, 2014)

. We deny Jackson’s motions for appropriate reli ef, to strike Appellees’ informal brief, and for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Our report on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Manhattan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly Atlantic Technology Ventures, Inc.) and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and for the year then ended and on the
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity
(deficiency) and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2002 to December 31,
2002 as related to the period from July 13, 1993 (date of inception) to December
31, 2002, is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002, is dated February 14, 2003, except for Notes 1 and 14 which
are as of February 21, 2003, and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to
the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. We consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report in the following Registration
Statements previously filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933: the Registration Statements
on Forms S-3 with SEC File Nos. 333-34379, 333-35079, 333-65393, 333-40916,
333-49036 and 333-57550 and the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 with SEC
file Nos. 333-15807 and 333-48531.

                                           /s/ J.H. COHN LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
April 11, 2003