alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1126

To repeal the provision in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 relating to

base periods for Federal unemployment tax purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1997

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and

Human Resources

A BILL

To repeal the provision in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997

relating to base periods for Federal unemployment tax

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF SECTION 5401 OF BALANCED BUDG4 ET ACT OF 1997.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5401 of the Balanced

6 Budget Act of 1997 is hereby repealed.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

8 subsection (a) shall apply for purposes of any period be-
2

•S 1126 IS

1 ginning before, on, or after the date of the enactment of

2 this Act.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard Arrington, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 877]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jaeger, J., at plea; Aaron, J., at sentencing), rendered February 15, 2011, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248 [2006]; *People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273 [1992]; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1 [1989]). Although the defendant’s waiver is thus valid, it does not preclude review of his claim that he was denied his right to due process because the County Court did not hold an evidentiary hearing regarding the basis for his post-plea arrest on unrelated crimes before imposing an enhanced sentence *(see People v Butler,*49 AD3d 894, 895 [2008]; *People v Kitchens,*46 AD3d 577, 578 [2007]; *People v Ricketts,*27 AD3d 488 [2006]; *People v Garner,*18 AD3d 669, 670 [2005]; *People v Stowe,*15 AD3d 597, 598 [2005]; *People v Scott P,*275 AD2d 723 [2000]; *People v Miles,*268 AD2d 489, 490 [2000]). However, this issue is unpreserved for appellate review because the defendant never objected to the adequacy of the inquiry conducted by the County Court, or moved to withdraw his plea *(see People v Kitchens,*46 AD3d at 578; *People v Darcy,*34 AD3d 230, 231 [2006]; *People v Benn,*23 AD3d 574 [2005]; *People v Potter,*288 AD2d 330 [2001]; *People v Miles,*268 AD2d at 490). In any event, the inquiry conducted by the County Court was sufficient to determine that there was a legitimate basis for the defendant’s post-plea arrest, and thus satisfied the requirements of due process *(see People v Outley,*80 NY2d 702, 712-713 [1993]; *see also People v Valencia,*3 NY3d 714, 715 [2004]; *People v Timberlake,*82 AD3d 1134, 1135 [2011]; *People v Serrano,*79 AD3d 772 [2010]; *People v Potter,*288 AD2d at 330).

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his remaining contentions, including his claim that his enhanced sentence was excessive *(see People v Ramos,*7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; *People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; *People v Crews,*92 AD3d 795 [2012]; *People v Pook,*73 AD3d 952, 953 [2010]), his ineffective assistance of counsel argument, which is unrelated to the voluntariness of his plea *(see People v Duah,*91 AD3d 884 [2012]; *People v Yarborough,*83 AD3d 875*904[2011]), and his challenge to the procedure utilized in sentencing him *(see People v*Collier, 71 AD3d 909, 910 [2010]). Skelos, J.P., Eng, Belen and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.2


 


UNRESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT UNDER THE 


2021 AMERGENT HOSPITALITY GROUP INC. INDUCEMENT
PLAN


 


(Fully Vested)


 


	Name of Grantee: 	Frederick L. Glick
	Number of Shares:	50,000
	Grant Date:	August 2, 2021


 


Pursuant to the 2021 Amergent
Hospitality Group Inc. Inducement Plan (the “Plan”), Amergent Hospitality Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)
hereby grants an Unrestricted Stock Award (an “Award”) to the Grantee named above. Upon acceptance of this Award, the Grantee
shall receive the number of shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share of the Company specified above (“Award Shares”).
The Company acknowledges the receipt from the Grantee of consideration in the form of services rendered to the Company by the Grantee
or such other form of consideration as is acceptable to the Plan administrator.


 


1. Acceptance
of Award. The Award Shares shall be issued electronically and allocated to the Grantee through the Company’s stock plan administration
system and transfer agent, and the Grantee’s name shall be entered as the stockholder of record on the books of the Company. Thereafter,
the Grantee shall have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to such Award Shares, including voting and dividend rights.


 


2. Transferability.
This Agreement is personal to the Grantee, is non-assignable and is not transferable in any manner, by operation of law or
otherwise, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.


 


3. Tax
Withholding. The Grantee shall, not later than the date as of which the receipt of this Award becomes a taxable event for Federal
income tax purposes, pay to the Company or make arrangements satisfactory to the administrator for payment of any Federal, state, and
local taxes required by law to be withheld on account of such taxable event.


 


4. Notices.
Notices hereunder shall be mailed or delivered to the Company at its principal place of business and shall be mailed or delivered to the
Grantee at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the
other party in writing.


 


	 	AMERGENT
    HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Michael D. Pruitt
	 	Name:	Michael
                                            D. Pruitt

	 	Title:	CEO



 






    	 



    	 



    

 


The foregoing Agreement is hereby
accepted and the terms and conditions thereof hereby agreed to by the undersigned.


 


	 	GRANTEE:
	 	 	 
	 	Signature:	/s/
    Frederick L. Glick
	 	 	Frederick
    L. Glick


 




    	Restricted Stock Award Agreement
	2
Exhibit 32.1

Informational Addendum to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as
follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely
to the extent this certification may be applicable to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, the undersigned hereby certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:

Gary D. OwensTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer January 27, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1298 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1298

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate a Federal building located in Florence, Alabama, as the 
              ``Justice John McKinley Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JUSTICE JOHN MCKINLEY FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 210 North Seminary Street in 
Florence, Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ``Justice John 
McKinley Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Justice John 
McKinley Federal Building''.

            Passed the Senate June 2, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1298

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate a Federal building located in Florence, Alabama, as the 
              ``Justice John McKinley Federal Building''.
```
October 15, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARGNUS IBE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00686

- CV V.

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVIC ES, LLC , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on July 24, 2015 . Having considered the

mo tion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Margnus Ibe.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory: Temple, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Online Tools
                        NLET
                                    SWIFT
                                    SNAP
                                    SWH
                                    ACRE
                                    AgOPTSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Temple, Texas Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory People & Locations







Joseph  Cortese
                        Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician
                        Phone:    
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2021088EN.01000801.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

(Case C-361/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy - Support scheme for farmers - Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 - Article 97(1) and Article 99(1) - Direct payments - Reductions and exclusions in the event of non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules - Determination of the year to be taken into account in order to calculate the percentage reduction - Proportionate, effective and dissuasive penalties - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 - Article 73(4), first subparagraph, point (a))

(2021/C 88/08)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: De Ruiter vof

Defendants: Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

Operative part of the judgment

The first subparagraph of Article 97(1) and the first subparagraph of Article 99(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008, and Article 73(4), first subparagraph, point (a) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation No 1306/2013 with regard to the integrated administration and control system, rural development measures and cross compliance must be interpreted as meaning that reductions of direct payments due to non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules must be calculated on the basis of the payments granted or to be granted in the year in which such non-compliance occurred.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Production Systems Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About CPSRU
                        CPSRU Mission StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Crop Production Systems Research People & Locations







Milton M Gaston
                        Crop Production Systems Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (662) 686-3627
                        
                        
                        Fax: (662) 686-5422(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-190854, 333-20165, 333-20167, 333-64083, 333-68176,and 333-152573) of Northwest Pipe Company of our report dated March 17, 2014, except with respect to our opinion on internal control over financial reporting insofar as it relates to the effects of the matter described in the penultimateparagraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, as to which the date is September 4, 2014 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

September 4, 2014
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 2, 2020

NO. 03-20-00174-CV

Erik Patton Stearns, Appellant

v.

Tenex Properties, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on February 19, 2020. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal and did not 

comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for 

want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each ofthe undersigned officers of Force Protection, Inc., a Nevada corporation(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The QuarterlyReport for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  August 9, 2007                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   |
| /s/ Gordon McGilton                        |   |
| Gordon McGilton                            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                    |   |
|                                       |   |
| Date: August 9, 2007                       |   |
|                                       |   |
| /s/ Michael Durski                         |   |
| Michael Durski                             |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                    |   |
| Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |   |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Monte Herring, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 498]

— Application by the defendant for a writ of error coram nobis seeking leave to file a late notice of appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered October 7, 2005.

Ordered that the application is granted, and the defendant’s notice of appeal is deemed to have been timely filed.

The defendant has established his entitlement to the relief requested *(see People v Syville,*15 NY3d 391 [2010]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Grain Quality and Structure Research: Manhattan, KS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Units
                        Center for Grain and Animal Health Research: Manhattan, KS
                                    Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit
                                    Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research Unit
                                    Stored Product Insect & Engineering Research UnitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Manhattan, Kansas Center for Grain and Animal Health Research Grain Quality and Structure Research People





- Fadi Aramouni
- Neil Baker
- Kenyon Base
- Scott Bean
- Yoanhong Chen
- Jose Covarrubias
- Joaquin DeLeon
- Kevin Fay
- Maria Hazelbaker
- Melanie Kessler-Mathieu
- Laura Knapp
- Lu Guixiang
- Alicsa Mayer
- Kerri McConnell
- Ashton McGinn
- Amie Norton
- Shantha Peiris
- Mayra Perez-Fajardo
- Jaymi Peterson
- Sushma Prakash
- Abraham Rivera
- Bradford Seabourn
- Xiaorong (Shawn) Wu

Kevin T Fay    Physical Science Technician


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov