alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Range and Meadow Forage Management Research: Burns, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Burns, Oregon Range and Meadow Forage Management Research People & Locations







Tony  Runnels
                        Range and Meadow Forage Management Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician
                        Phone: (541) 573-8914
                        
                        
                        Fax: (541) 573-3042(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 403 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 403

 To authorize testimony, document production, and legal representation 
           in United States v. Richard F. ``Dickie'' Scruggs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2012

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony, document production, and legal representation 
           in United States v. Richard F. ``Dickie'' Scruggs.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Richard F. ``Dickie'' Scruggs, Case No. 
        3:09-CR-00002-GHD-SAA, pending in the United States District Court for 
        the Northern District of Mississippi, the defense has served a subpoena 
        for testimony on Hugh Gamble, a former employee of Senator Trent Lott, 
        and a subpoena for testimony and document production on Brad Davis, an 
        employee of Senator Thad Cochran;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to 
        any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official 
        responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Hugh Gamble, Brad Davis, and any other employee from 
whom testimony may be necessary are authorized to testify, and Brad 
Davis is authorized to produce documents, in the case of United States 
v. Richard F. ``Dickie'' Scruggs, except concerning matters for which a 
privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Hugh 
Gamble, Brad Davis, and any other employee of the Senate from whom 
evidence may be sought, in connection with the testimony and document 
production authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah *v.*Harms.

Beck, J.

It is alleged in the petition in this suit, which was brought against a municipal corporation to recover damages, that the petitioner ' was the owner of a certain lot of land and the buildings thereon, said property being situated adjacent to the right of way of a certain railroad at the intersection of that road with Bolton Street in the corporate limits of the defendant municipality, which through its public works department furnished the grade and plans for the elevation of the track and road-bed of the railroad named, “incident to the building of the Gwinnett Street Subway, and, in order to accomplish the elevation of said tracks at Gwinnett Street, said tracks for a distance of a block and a half north and south of said Gwinnett Street Subway were raised on a gradual incline from the former level-to the height required at Gwinnett Street, and in thus grading and elevating the road-bed and tracks the portion of the track immediately east of your petitioner’s property was elevated about one foot, and a slope or incline was made from said tracks, as elevated, to the premises of petitioner,” the result of this being that when it rains the water which flows upon the tracks *791and right of way at the Bolton Street crossing runs down the incline upon the property of petitioner, where it accumulates under the house; and that this has resulted in certain injuries to petitioner’s property. The negligence-charged against the defendant corporation is, *(a)*the failure to place a sewer or ditch between the right of way of the railroad and petitioner’s property, for the purpose of carrying off the water which would otherwise run from the right of way upon the adjacent property; and *(b)*the failure to grade the incline from the right of way into Bolton Street, so that the water would flow into Bolton Street and thence to the nearest sewer. *Held,*that no cause of action is stated in this petition against the city, it not appearing that the plan furnished by the city through its engineering department was defective in itself, or that it involved the changing of the grade of the street, or that any of the work necessarily involved in the execution of the plan furnished by the city was in the street itself.

August 10, 1915.

Action for damages. Before Judge Charlton. Chatham superior • court. March *2i,*1914.

*John Rourke Jr.*and *David S. Atkinson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Twiggs & Gazan,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices eonewr.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**Certification of the Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, KevinF. McLaughlin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Kevin F.  McLaughlin |                     |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|
| Name:                    | Kevin F.  McLaughlin     |
| Title:                   | Chief  Executive Officer |
| Date:                    | August 5,  2005          |
|                          |                          |  |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry J. White, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Dated: May 13, 2005
    
    /s/ HARRY J. WHITE, JR.

Harry J. White, Jr.
#### McLAUGHLIN, Respondent, v. SYRACUSE RAPID TRANSIT RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by John McLaughlin against the Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### In the Matter of James G. Pennachio, Petitioner, v Thomas P. DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 787]—

Lahtinen, J.P.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a police officer for the City of Yonkers, Westchester County, was assigned to assist with search and rescue operations at the World Trade Center site on September 12, 2001. Shortly thereafter, he started receiving medical treatment for respiratory issues. Petitioner retired from his job in April 2008 and received line of duty retirement benefits and further sought disability retirement benefits. Ultimately, respondent denied petitioner benefits on the basis that he was not permanently incapacitated from the performance of his duties. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Petitioner bore the burden of proving that he was permanently incapacitated from the performance of the duties associated with his employment *(see Matter of Camera v DiNapoli,*92 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2012]; *Matter of Salik v New York State & Local Employees’ Retirement Sys.,*69 AD3d 1029, 1030 [2010]).* Notably, where the medical evidence is conflicting, respondent is vested with the authority to weigh the evidence and credit one expert’s opinion over that of another *(see Matter of Camera v DiNapoli,*92 AD3d at 1020; *Matter of*
      *1558
      *Browne v DiNapoli,*85 AD3d 1535, 1536 [2011]). Here, petitioner presented a medical opinion from his treating physician stating that he was totally and permanently disabled from the performance of his job as a police officer due to various respiratory conditions. However, a pulmonologist who performed an independent medical examination and thoroughly reviewed petitioner’s medical records opined that he suffered from no significant impairment and met no criteria for disability. Accordingly, because the medical expert relied upon by respondent examined petitioner, reviewed his medical records and provided a rational, fact-based opinion, we find the determination to be supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Kossifos v DiNapoli,*92 AD3d 1073, 1074 [2012]; *Matter of Kaufman v Murray,*85 AD3d 1534, 1535 [2011]).

Spain, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

It should be noted that the “World Trade Center presumption,” for which petitioner qualifies, entitles him to the presumption that any health impairment was incurred in the performance of his duty and was the natural and proximate result of an accident that was not caused by his own willful negligence, but does not shift the burden of proof with regard to permanent incapacity *(see*Retirement and Social Security Law § 363 [g] [1] [a]).
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 2997-031]
 On July 1, 2019, South Sutter Water District filed an application for a major, new license for the 6.8-megawatt Camp Far West Hydroelectric Project (Camp Far West Project; FERC No. 2997). The Camp Far West Project is located on the Bear River in Yuba, Nevada, and Placer Counties, California. No federal or tribal lands occur within or adjacent to the project boundary or along the Bear River downstream of the project. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on March 16, 2021, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the record, including comments filed on the REA Notice, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare a draft and final Environmental Assessment (EA) on the 
                    ( print page 44017)
                    application to relicense the Camp Far West Project. The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. The application will be processed according to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues draft EA
January 2022.Comments on draft EA
February 2022.Commission issues final EA
May 2022 1
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Quinn Emmering at (202) 502-6382 or 
                    *quinn.emmering@ferc.gov.* Dated: August 5, 2021. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         The Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) regulations under 40 CFR 1501.10(b)(1) require that EAs be completed within 1 year of the federal action agency's decision to prepare an EA. This notice establishes the Commission's intent to prepare a draft and final EA for the Camp Far West Project. Therefore, in accordance with CEQ's regulations, the final EA must be issued within 1 year of the issuance date of this notice. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2021-17128 Filed 8-10-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food and Feed Safety Research: College Station, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area College Station, Texas Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center Food and Feed Safety Research People & Locations







John  Sullivan
                        Food and Feed Safety Research

                        




                        
                        Microbiologist
                        Phone: (979) 260-9374
                        
                        
                        Fax: (979) 260-9332(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 3.4
OCTOBER 1994 AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
<PAGE>

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF INNOVET, INC.

Pursuant to Paragraph 607.1006 of the Florida Business Corporation Act, the
following constitutes the Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
of InnoVet, Inc.

1.  The name of the corporation is InnoVet, Inc.

2.  The text of the Amendment is as follows:

Article III of the Articles of Incorporation of InnoVet, Inc. is deleted in its
entirety, and the following substituted in its place and stead:

                                  " III.

Capital Stock.  The maximum number of shares of stock this Corporation is
authorized to have outstanding at any time is one hundred million shares of
common stock at a par value of $.001 per share."

3.  The Amendment was adopted in September 16, 1994.

4.  The Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of InnoVet, Inc. was adopted
by the shareholders and accordingly, the number of votes cast for the Amendment
was sufficient for approval.

Dated this 16th day of September, 1994.


/S/ Scott P. Cielewich
----------------------
Scott P. Cielewich,
Executive Vice President


ATTEST:

/S/ Scott P. Cielewich
----------------------
Scott P. Cielewich, Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
  Accompanying
    Form 10-Q
    Report
    of First Industrial, L.P.
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and
    (b))
  Form 10-Q
  Michael
    W. Brennan
  
    Michael
    J. Havala
  
    A signed original of this written statement required by
    Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
    retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information
    contained in this written statement shall not be deemed
    filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
    incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act
    of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall
    be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gexa Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sarah Veach, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/SARAH VEACHSarah Veach
Chief Accounting Officer
Dated: May 18, 2004 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gexa Corp. and will be retained by Gexa Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

88

---



QuickLinks