alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AY J OH NS ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. W I N N P R O P E R T I E S ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees, N o. 09- 55184 D . C. N o . 5 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 0 9 1 - SG L- J CR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S t e phe n G . L ar s on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t11, 2011 ** B efo re: T H O M A S , S IL V E R M A N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J ayJ o h n s o n ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s o r d e rd is m is s in g h is a c t i o n u n d e rth e Fa i rH o u s i n g A c tar i s i n g f r o m h i s e v i c t i o n f

r o m l o w i n c o me hous i ng. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo, and m aya f f irm o n an yg r o u n ds up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . T hom ps on v . P aul , 547 F . 3d 

# FI LED AU G 15 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 55184 2 1 0 5 5 , 1 0 5 8 - 5 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e a f f i rm. D i sm i ss alof John son’ s a ct i on w as prop erbecause J oh nson fa i l ed t o st at e a cl ai m for hou si ng di sc ri m i nat i on or vi ol at i on s of s t at e l aw , despi t e havi ng been g r an te dle a v e to a m e n d . See C al . H ea l th & S af ety C od e § 51 06 6(c) (“ B ef ore a r ig h t to ah e ar in g v e s ts , th e te n an t s h a ll p ayr e n t f o rth e tw o - w e e kh e ar in g p e r io dto th e o w n e ro rto an e s c r o w a c c o u n t o f th e a g e n c y . . . .” ) ; G i eb eler v. M & B A sso cs. , 3 4 3 F .3 d1 1 4 3 , 1 1 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( e le m e n ts o f h an d ic ap d is c r im in a tio n c la im u n d e rth e F a irH o u s in g A c t) ; G i l l i gan v . J am c o D e v . C or

p. , 1 0 8 F .3 d2 4 6 , 2 5 0 ( 9 th C i r. 19 97 ) ( F ai r H ou si ng A ctprov i des apri vat e r i gh tof ac t i on for an “ aggri eved pe r s on” s ubj e c t e d t o “ an a l l e ge d di s c r i m i na t oryhous i ng pr a c t i c e ” ( c i t a t i on and in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m ark s o m itte d ) ) ; W i le yv . C ount

yof San D i ego , 966 P . 2d 983, 98 5 (C al . 19 98 ) ( el em ent s of l egalm alprac t i ce ); D avi dson v. C i t y of W es tm i nster , 64 9 P . 2d 89 4, 90 1 (C al . 19 82 ) ( el em ent s of i nt ent i on ali nfl i ct i on of em ot i on al d is tr e s s ) . W e d o n o t c o n s id e rf

a c ts p r e s e n te df

o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See U ni ted States v . E l i as , 92 1 F . 2d 87 0, 87 4 (9th C i r. 19 90 ). John son’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2016

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2016

153889(63)

RONNIE DANCER and ANNETTE DANCER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, SC: 153889

v COA: 324314

Kalamazoo CC: 12-000571-NO

CLARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Defendant, and

BETTER BUILT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,

INC., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs-appellees to extend the time 

for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 12, 2016.
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Merlin Bingham, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Metalline Mining Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andhave: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions containedin SEC Release 34-47986] (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors; (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.September 18, 2007   /s/ Merlin Bingham     Merlin Bingham, President
# Official Journal C 16/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 16 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6617 January 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 16

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6617 January 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 16/01 | Euro exchange rates – 16 January 2023 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 16/01

Euro exchange rates – 16 January 2023

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 16/02 | Call for proposals and related activities under the 2023 work plan of the Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking | 2 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 16/03 | Publication of an approved standard amendment to a product specification of a protected designation of origin or protected geographical indications in the sector of agricultural products and foodstuffs, as referred to in Article 6b(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 664/2014 | 3 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2023/C 16/02

Call for proposals and related activities under the 2023 work plan of the Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking

2

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2023/C 16/03

Publication of an approved standard amendment to a product specification of a protected designation of origin or protected geographical indications in the sector of agricultural products and foodstuffs, as referred to in Article 6b(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 664/2014

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 13.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of DeRigo S.p.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company (the“Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: June 28, 2005    /s/  Ennio De Rigo   Name:  Ennio De Rigo   Title:  Chief Executive Officer   Dated: June 28, 2005                                     /s/  Maurizio Dessolis   Name:  Maurizio Dessolis   Title:  Chief Financial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to De Rigo S.p.A. and will be retained by De Rigo S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
 

 
     
**Exhibit 13.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of DeRigo S.p.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company(the “Form 20-F/A”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                          /s/  Ennio De Rigo  Dated: June 30, 2005 Name:  Ennio De Rigo   Title:  Chief Executive Officer                                        /s/  Maurizio Dessolis  Dated: June 30, 2005 Name:  Maurizio Dessolis   Title:  Chief Financial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to De Rigo S.p.A. and will be retained by De Rigo S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fatima Crowder, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 169]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. *516Stolz, J.), rendered March 23, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted gang assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing her to an aggregate term of 372 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims are unreviewable on direct appeal because they involve matters outside the record concerning trial strategy and potential testimony *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 998 [1982]). While defendant points out that her trial attorney was in no position to make a CPL 440.10 motion attacking his own performance, there is no requirement that a defendant be represented in postconviction proceedings by the same attorney who represented the defendant at trial.

To the extent the existing record permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). There were reasonable explanations for trial counsel’s decision not to call as witnesses three codefendants who had been convicted prior to defendant’s trial *(see People v Smith,*82 NY2d 731, 733 [1993]; *People v Pedraza,*56 AD3d 390, 391 [2008], *lv denied*12 NY3d 761 [2009]). In any event, defendant has not shown that she was prejudiced by this decision. The record does not establish that any of the codefendants “would have actually testified, that they would have given exculpatory testimony, or that the jury would have been likely to credit such testimony” *(People v Green,*27 AD3d 231, 233 [2006], *lv denied*6 NY3d 894 [2006]).

There is no merit to defendant’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to request a missing witness charge regarding the prosecutor’s failure to call the codefendants to testify for the People. Defendant would not have been entitled to such a charge, because these witnesses were not in the People’s control for missing witness purposes. Former codefendants would not “naturally be expected to provide” testimony favorable to the People *(see People v Kitching, 78*NY2d 532, 536 [1991]). Defendant’s assertion that the People had originally intended to call the codefendants as witnesses is based on a misreading of the voluntary disclosure form, which sets forth statement and identification evidence to be used against each of the four defendants, individually. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2003                                  /s/ ROBERT E. MEAD
                                                  ------------------------
                                                   Robert E. Mead
#### In the Matter of City of Syracuse, Appellant, v Central New York Association of Delta Kappa Epsilon, Respondent.

[945 NYS2d 587]

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), entered March 14, 2011. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of petitioner to dismiss the appeal of respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 127

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance programs, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. ROTH, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs.

BOXER, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. FORD,

Mr. GLENN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HATCH, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY of

Massachusetts, Mr. KYL, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. ROBB, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. TORRICELLI, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

permanent the exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance programs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Educational

5 Assistance Act’’.
2

•S 127 IS

1 SEC. 2. EMPLOYER-PROVIDED EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE

2 PROGRAMS.

3 (a) PERMANENT EXTENSION.—Section 127 of the

4 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusion for

5 educational assistance programs) is amended by striking

6 subsection (d) and by redesignating subsection (e) as sub7 section (d).

8 (b) REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON GRADUATE EDU9 CATION.—The last sentence of section 127(c)(1) of such

10 Code is amended by striking ‘‘, and such term also does

11 not include any payment for, or the provision of any bene12 fits with respect to, any graduate level course of a kind

13 normally taken by an individual pursuing a program lead14 ing to a law, business, medical, or other advanced aca15 demic or professional degree’’.

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATES.—

17 (1) EXTENSION.—The amendments made by

18 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning

19 after December 31, 1996.

20 (2) GRADUATE EDUCATION.—The amendment

21 made by subsection (b) shall apply with respect to

22 expenses relating to courses beginning after June

23 30, 1996.

24 (3) EXPEDITED PROCEDURES.—The Secretary

25 of the Treasury shall establish expedited procedures

26 for the refund of any overpayment of taxes imposed
3

•S 127 IS

1 by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which is at2 tributable to amounts excluded from gross income

3 during 1996 or 1997 under section 127 of such

4 Code, including procedures waiving the requirement

5 that an employer obtain an employee’s signature

6 where the employer demonstrates to the satisfaction

7 of the Secretary that any refund collected by the em8 ployer on behalf of the employee will be paid to the

9 employee.

Æ
EXHIBIT 99.1


            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Franklin Street Properties Corp. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of
the Company.

Date: December 23, 2002

                                         /s/ George J. Carter
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                         /s/ Barbara J. Corinha
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Vice President, Chief Operating
                                         Officer (equivalent of Chief Financial
                                         Officer), Treasurer and Secretary
Case: 1:02-cv-01687 Document #: 8 Filed: 04/02/02 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:30
Case: 1:02-cv-01687 Document #: 8 Filed: 04/02/02 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:31
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Jeffrey I. Dreben, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of CVF TechnologiesCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)for the registrantand have:
a. designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fiscal fourth quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information;and b. any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: November 15, 2004              /s/ Jeffrey I. Dreben   Jeffrey I. Dreben,   Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries  Exhibit 21Subsidiaries of Registrant
 State or Other Jurisdiction ofName
    
    IncorporationSmall Tube Manufacturing, LLC
    
    DelawareTube Forming, LP
    
    DelawareWolverine Europe
    
    FranceWolverine European Holdings, B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsWolverine Finance, LLC
    
    TennesseeWolverine Joining Technologies, LLC
    
    DelawareWolverine Joining Technologies Canada, Inc.
    
    OntarioWolverine Tube Europe B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsWolverine Tube, B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsWolverine Tube (Canada) Inc.
    
    OntarioWolverine Tube (Shanghai) Limited
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaWolverine Tubagem (Portugal), Limitada
    
    PortugalTF Investor, Inc.
    
    DelawareTube Forming Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareWT Holding Company, Inc.
    
    Delaware3072996 Nova Scotia Company, a Nova Scotia ULC
    
    Nova Scotia3072452 Nova Scotia Company, a Nova Scotia ULC
    
    Nova Scotia3072453 Nova Scotia Company, a Nova Scotia ULC
    
    Nova ScotiaWolverine Tube Canada Limited Partnership
    
    New BrunswickWolverine China Investments, LLC
    
    DelawareWLVN de Latinoamerica, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoWLV Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoDEJ 98 Finance, LLC
    
    Delaware