# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 0959 V (not to be published)

PATRICIA S. TIEDEMAN

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: August 18, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

David Alexander Tierney, Rawls Law Group, Richmond, VA , for P etitioner.

Debra A. Filteau Begley , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY ’ S FEES AND COSTS 1

On July 2, 2019

, Patricia Tiedeman filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from chronic left arm and shoulder

pain and adhesive capsulitis as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on

November 2, 2017

. ( Petition at 1 )

. On June 8, 2021

, a decision was issued awarding

compensation to P etitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer

. (ECF No. 36 )

.

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated July 27, 2021

(ECF No. 40 ) , requesting a total award of $ 10,351.87 (representing $ 8,394.80 in fees and

$ 1,957.07 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner filed a signed

statement indicating that she incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses. (ECF No. 40

- 3 )

. Respondent reacted to the motion on August 10, 2021, indicating that he “does not object

to the amount sought as it is not an unreasonable amount to have been incurred in this

case.” (ECF No. 41 ). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my
experience , the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. Section

15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney ’ s fees and costs. I

award a total of $ 10,351.87 (representing $ 8,394.80 in fees and $ 1,957.07 in costs) as a

lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel

. In

the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court),

the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this dec ision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.