alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w19






Exhibit 10.19




	 	 	 
	

	 	Woodward Governor Company

1000 East Drake Road

P.O. Box 1519

Fort Collins, CO 80522-1519 USA

Tel: 970-482-5811

Fax: 970-498-3058






	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	October 1, 2008
	 
	 	 
	To:

	 	Chad Preiss
	 
	 	 
	From:

	 	Tom Gendron
	 

	 	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 
	Subject:

	 	Confirmation of Promotion






Dear Chad,



We are pleased to present to you the following details of your promotion:




POSITION:





	 	•	 	Your new position will be Group Vice President, Engine Systems.
	 
	 	•	 	Your new position is classified as a Grade 11 on the Executive Compensation Structure,
and will be used as the basis for determining your variable pay.
	 
	 	•	 	In addition, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviewed the Hewitt
total compensation data and approved our recommendations for all compensation changes.
	 
	 	•	 	You will continue to be based in the Fort Collins, Colorado facility and report directly
to me.





COMPENSATION:





	 	•	 	Effective with the pay period beginning October 4, 2008, your base salary will be
$10,000 bi-weekly or $260,000 annually. This represents a combined merit/promotional
base pay increase of 12%.
	 
	 	•	 	You will continue to participate in the Management Incentive Plan (MIP). For FY09 your
annual incentive pay target will move from 40% to 55% of base pay. This represents a cash
target bonus of $143,000.
	 
	 	•	 	This position qualifies for stock Options. The granting of stock options is not a
guarantee, and is subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors.
	 
	 	•	 	You will continue to participate in the Woodward Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP).
Beginning in FY09, your cash LTIP target will increase from 25% to 35%. This represents a
cash target bonus of $91,000.
	 
	 	•	 	You will be eligible for a salary review on October 1, 2009.




Please contact me should you have any questions. Chad, we are looking forward to your leadership
abilities in running the Engine Systems Business Group. In your new position, you will play a key
role on the Executive Staff and will have significant impact on our ability to meet our Vision
2010, goals and strategies.




 









 












If you accept this promotion on the terms and conditions set forth in this letter, please sign
below and return the original of this letter to my attention.




Sincerely,




Tom Gendron




	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Chad Preiss

	 	Date
(55 Misc. Rep. 392.)

#### KELSEY v. WALLS.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

July, 1907.)

Pleading—Complaint—Legal and Equitable Relief.

Where averments of a complaint are consistent with a demand for damages without resort to equity to fix the amount, it is not open to demurrer, though equitable relief is also sought.

[Ed. Noté.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 39, Pleading, §§ 143, 440.]

Action by Charles B. Kelsey against Charles H. Walls. Demurrer to complaint overruled.

Rollins & Rollins, for plaintiff.

Robert W. Crawford, for defendant.

BISCHOFF, J.

Treating the complaint as one which sets forth a trespass merely a cause of action at law is apparent; and, since the averments are all consistent with the demand for damages without resort to equity to fix the amount—as upon an accounting—the pleading is not open to demurrer, notwithstanding that equitable relief is also sought. Doyle v. Delaney, 112 App. Div. 856, 98 N. Y. Supp. 468. The rule stated in Black v. Vanderbilt, 70 App. Div. 16, 74 N. Y. Supp. 1095, relied upon by the defendant, has no application to the present case, because of the distinction noted in Doyle v. Delaney, supra.

Demurrer overruled with costs, with leave to defendant to plead over on payment of costs within 20 days.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41241 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS JAVIER VEGA-OLVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-201-1

-------------------- June 16, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Vega-Olvera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). VegaOlvera has not filed a timely response. Vega-Olvera has moved for an extension of time in which to file his response. He asserts that he seeks to challenge the district court’s finding that he had been convicted of an aggravated felony. We have considered that point and additional pleadings are not needed. Vega-Olvera’s motion for an extension is DENIED as unnecessary. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. The motion for leave to withdraw isNo. 99-41241 -2- GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
#### LaFollette Iron Company *v.*Wiley.

June 22, 1915.

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Bartow superior court. July 24, 1914.

*Neel & Neel,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. B. Arnold*and *Colquitt & Conyers,*contra.

Hill, J.

1. The requests to charge, so far as pertinent, were covered by the general charge.

2. While certain portions of the charges complained of were not entirely accurate, they furnish no ground for a new trial.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00479-CR

VICTOR PRIETO AZAMAR

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-1380-13-J(1)

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 26, 2017
#### Robert J. Kelly et al., Appellants, v Town of Kent et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action \o recover damages for personal injuries resulting from water contamination, plaintiffs *313appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Beisheim, J.), dated August 19,1983, which, upon the motion of the defendants Putnam County and Putnam County Board of Health to dismiss the complaint as against them for nonjoinder of the State of New York as a necessary party, dismissed the complaint as against all defendants “without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to pursue their claim against the defendants in the Court of Claims".

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. *(See, Baisley v Town of Kent,*111 AD2d 299.) Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agroecosystem Management Research: Lincoln, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lincoln, Nebraska Agroecosystem Management Research People & Locations







Kyle J Ward
                        Agroecosystem Management Research

                        




                        
                        Grants and Agreements Specialist
                        Phone: (402) 326-5821
                        
                        
                        Fax: (402) 472-4020(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
  /s/ ANDREW HAMERAndrew HamerVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Written Statement
Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 The undersigned, Steven G. Murdock, the Chief Executive Officer of Meade
Instruments Corp. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby
certifies that: (i) the Form 10Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2004 of the
Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: October 15, 2004 By: /s/ Steven G. Murdock This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:25
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:26
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:27
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:28
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:29
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:30
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:31
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:32
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:33
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:34
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:35
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:36
Case: 1:02-cv-03690 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:37
B3A (Official Form 3A) (12/07)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Northern District of Illinois

In re

Todd M Cline

Carol A Cline Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 13

APPLICATION TO PAY FILING FEE IN INSTALLMENTS

1. In accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1006, I apply for permission to pay the Filing Fee amounting to $ 274.00 in installments.

2. I am unable to pay the filing fee except in installments.

3. Until the filing fee is paid in full, I will not make any additional payments or transfer any additional property to an attorney or any

other person for services in connection with this case.

4. I propose the following terms for the payment of the Filing Fee.*

$ 68.50 Check one  With the filing of the petition, or

 On or before

$ 68.50 on or before

$ 68.50 on or before

$ 68.50 on or before

* The number of installments proposed shall not exceed four (4), and the final installment shall be payable not later than 120 days

after filing the petition. For cause shown, the court may extend the time of any installment, provided the last installment is paid

not later than 180 days after filing the petition. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1006(b)(2).

5. I understand that if I fail to pay any installment when due, my bankruptcy case may be dismissed and I may not receive a discharge

of my debts.

Date January 5, 2010 Signature /s/ Todd M Cline

Todd M Cline

/s/ KRISTEN M. THOMPSON Debtor

Attorney for Debtor(s)

KRISTEN M. THOMPSON

Balsley & Dahlberg, LLP

5130 North Second Street

Loves Park, IL 61111 Signature /s/ Carol A Cline

(815) 877-2593 Carol A Cline

Fax: (815) 877-7965

www.balsleylawoffice.com

Joint Debtor

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2009 Best Case Solutions, Inc. - Evanston, IL - (800) 492-8037 Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 10-70036 Doc 2 Filed 01/07/10 Entered 01/07/10 08:36:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
** **

**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION****OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Kevin F. McLaughlin,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

Date:       August 4, 2006
| /s/ Kevin F. McLaughlin  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Kevin F.  McLaughlin     |
| Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Healthy Processed Foods Research: Albany, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Albany, California Western Regional Research Center Healthy Processed Foods Research Research





- ARS National Programs
- Search for a scientific manuscript
- Search for a research project
- ARS Software
- Programs and Projects
- Collaborations
- Subjects of Investigation
- Publications
- Rebecca Milczarek *(Scopus)*
- Yuzhu Zhang *(PubMed)*

Collaborations The Healthy Processed Foods Research has a long and productive history of collaborative research involving stakeholders.  Current collaborators and projects:  Develop Functional Plant-Based Proteins  Novel Isochoric Processing For Sustainable, Safe And High Quality Preservation Of Fluid Foods  Novel Isochoric Processing for Sustainable, Safe and High Quality Preservation of Fluid Foods  Engineering Sustainable 3D Scaffolds for Enhancing Delivery and Growth of Probiotics in the Gut Synergistic Combination of Polyphenolics with Probiotics for Enhanced Delivery,  Persistence and Functionality of Probiotic Bacteria  Inhibition of the Gut Microbial Metabolite Trimethylamine N9oxide (TMAO) Using Orange Peel to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[945 NYS2d 561]

#### In the Matter of Mildred C. Didio (Admitted as Mildred Catherine Didio), an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

April 3, 2012

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gary L. Casella,*White Plains *(Fredda Fixler-Fuchs*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Richard E. Mischel,*New York City, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On October 25, 2011, in the Supreme Court, Westchester *134County (Lorenzo, J.), the respondent was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of grand larceny in the second degree (four counts), a class C felony, in violation of Penal Law § 155.40; scheme to defraud in the first degree, a class E felony, in violation of Penal Law § 190.65; and conspiracy in the fourth degree, a class E felony, in violation of Penal Law § 105.10.

The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) now moves to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), based upon her felony convictions. The respondent does not oppose the Grievance Committee’s motion.

By virtue of her felony convictions, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), and was automatically disbarred on October 25, 2011. Accordingly, the Grievance Committee’s motion to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law is granted to reflect the respondent’s disbarment as of October 25, 2011.

Mastro, A.PJ., Rivera, Skelos, Dillon and Leventhal, JJ, concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), the respondent, Mildred C. Didio, admitted as Mildred Catherine Didio, is disbarred, effective October 25, 2011, and her name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Mildred C. Didio, admitted as Mildred Catherine Didio, shall comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys *(see*22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Mildred C. Didio, admitted as Mildred Catherine Didio, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and its is further,

Ordered that if the respondent, Mildred C. Didio, admitted as Mildred Catherine Didio, has been issued a secure pass by the *135Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency, and the respondent shall certify to the same in her affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10 (f).
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

To the Board of Directors and 

Stockholders ofOYO Geospace Corporation: 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-80003 and No. 333-40893) of OYO Geospace Corporation of our report dated December 3, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appear in the Annual Reportto Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated December 3, 2004 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

Houston, Texas 

December 7, 2004