alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998             FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997             AUG-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                               2                       4
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,752                   5,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                       308                     248
<INVENTORY>                                     14,399                  12,077
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,922                  18,027
<PP&E>                                           3,277                   2,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,232                   1,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,425                  20,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,333                  11,775
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                   6,490
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            79                   3,511
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,517                  (8,463)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,425                  20,524
<SALES>                                         25,024                  19,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,024                  19,197
<CGS>                                           16,413                  13,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,413                  13,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,135                   5,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 748                     716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,728                     (10)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       719                      (5)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,009                      (5)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                         (374)                    (65)
<NET-INCOME>                                       635                     (70)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research: Leetown, WV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Leetown, West Virginia Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research People & Locations







Kathryn L Root

(Kathy)
                        Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (304) 724-8340
                         ext. 2102
                        
                        Fax: (304) 725-0351(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Whitehead *v.*Whitehead.

March 10, 1915.

Temporary alimony. Before Judge Mathews. Bibb superior court. July 27, 1914.

*Newman & Newman,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. C. Estes*and *W. A. McClellan,*contra.

Hill, J.

1. Where the husband sued for divorce, alleging cruel treatment and adultery, and the wife in her answer sought by way of cross-action a divorce on the ground of cruelty, and asked alimony and counsel fees, on the hearing of her application for temporary alimony there was no error in permitting her to testify as to relevant matters not involving the question of adultery. *Arnold*v. *Arnold,*141 *Ga.*158 (3), 160 (80 S. E. 652).

2. The court did not abuse its discretion in awarding temporary alimony and attorney’s fees.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Stenson, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 588]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Fahey, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.
# Official Journal C 168A/22 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 168A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5822 May 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 168A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5822 May 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 168A/01 | Vacancy for the Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2015/20005 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2015/C 168A/01

Vacancy for the Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2015/20005

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Elder *v.*The State.

Per Curiam.

1. The words “reasonable doubt” are of such obvious significance that, in the absence of an appropriate written request, an omission to define them will not require a new trial. *Battle*v. *State,*103 *Ga.*53 (2), 57 (29 S. E. 491).

2. On the trial of a murder case it is not advisable for the judge, while instructing the jury on the subject of implied malice, to use the expression, “it may appear in the gleam of a knife, or from the flash from the shot of a gun.” *Mills*v. *State,*133 *Ga.*155 (65 S. E. 368) ; *Leonard*v. *State,*133 *Ga.*435 (66 S. E. 251); *Ricketson*v. *State,*134 *Ga.*306 (67 S. E. 881).

*{a)*Under the facts of this case, and when considered in connection with the context, the use of the expression quoted above does not require a new trial.

3. The charge: “But if you think for any reason there are extenuating circumstances which do not reduce it from murder to manslaughter, or justify it, but for any reason you think this man should not suffer the death penalty but should be imprisoned for life, you would express it in your verdict, and that would he the sentence of the court,” will not require a new trial. Such language did not circumscribe or restrict the *384jury in respect to’the exercise of their right of recommendation. *Valentine*v. *State,*77 *Ga.*470 (4) ; *Inman*v. *State,*72 *Ga.*269 (6) ; *Cyrus*v. *State,*102 *Ga.*617; Penal Code (1910), § 63.

April 20, 1915.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Hill. Fulton superior court. May *23,*1914.

*William M. Smith,*for plaintiff in error. *Warren Grice, attorney-general,*and *Hugh M. Dorsey, solicitor-general,*contra.

4. It is sought, in other grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial, to assign error upon the instructions to the jury; but neither the instructions nor the assignments of error are set forth with sufficient clearness to enable this court to intelligently pass thereon.

5. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the- Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
=
“§ A UNITED STATES DisTRICT COURT
I NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
XN 4s 219 SOUTH DEARBORN STREET
arg CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
MICHAEL W. DOBBINS
CLERK 312-435-5670
June 6, 2005

Mr. Gino J. Agnello, Clerk et
U.S. Court of Appeals-Seventh Circuit E cory
219 South Dearborn Street-Room 2722 7 IL ‘s
Chicago, Illinois 60604 . °

RE: United States of America vs. Matthew Hale

U.S.D.C. DOCKET NO. : 03 CR 11

U.S.C.A. DOCKET NO. : 05-1922

Dear Mr. Agnello:

Please find attached the supplemental record on appeal consisting of the following:
VOLUME(S) OF PLEADING(S)

FOUR (4) VOLUME(S) OF TRANSCRIPT(S)

VOLUME(S) OF DEPOSITION(S)

EXHIBITS: U.S.C.A.—7th Circuit
RECEIVED
VAULT ITEMS:
JUN 7 2005 BT
OTHER (SPECIFY):

GINO J. AGNELLO
CLERK
SPECIAL NOTE: Original record transmitted 4/28/05 under USCA# 05-1922.

Please acknowledge date of receipt of the above mentioned materials on the attached copy of this
letter.

Very truly yours,

Michael W. Dobbins, Clerk
WARSHR GEER

Marsha E, Glenn, Deputy Clerk

By



FILE COPY

I, MICHAEL W. DOBBINS, Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, do hereby certify to the United States Court of Appeals, for the Seventh Circuit, the following,
to wit, in supplement to the Record on Appeal heretofore certified to your court on 4/28/05.

In the cause entitled: United States of America vs. Matthew Hale

USDC NO. : 03 CR 11

USCA NO. : 05-1922

DATE ITEMNO. DESCRIPTION
5/25/05 296 Transcript of proceedings before Judge Moody on 4/7/04
(1 Vol.)
6/2/05 297 Transcript of proceedings before Judge Moody on
4/7104, 4/8/04, 4/9/04 (3 Vols.)

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, | have hereunto
subscribed my name and affixed the seal of aforesaid
court at Chicago, Illinois, this 6th day of June, 2005.

Michael W. Dobbins, Clerk
py: MARSHIA GENT
Marsha E. Glenn, Deputy Clerk

appsupcer.wpt
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sustainable Water Management Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Sustainable Water Management Research People & Locations







Jessica  Harrell
                        Sustainable Water Management Research

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (662) 686-3743
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00678-CR

RENE ZAMORA

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

331st District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-1-DC-13-904017

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 2, 2015
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brunce Smith, Also Known as Bruce Smith, Also Known as Nat Smith, Also Known as Nathaniel Dickerson, Appellant.

—Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, the judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), rendered on June 26, 1981, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Ross, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12004V/AFI/DCL/23

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - FINAL ACT - A.Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution - 23.Declaration on Article III-273(1), second subparagraph***Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0462 - 0462*

23. Declaration on Article III-273(1), second subparagraph

The Conference considers that the European laws referred to in the second subparagraph of Article III-273(1) should take into account national rules and practices relating to the initiation of criminal investigations.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Merchants & Mechanics Bank *v.*Boyd Company *et al.*

Beck, J.

1. If a transferee of stock, having authority himself to transfer and assign the same, becomes the debtor of another and pledges the stock to secure the payment of the debt, the pledgee would have the right to collect the dividends paid upon this stock in liquidation of the affairs of the corporation and in effecting a dissolution of the corporation, upon giving notice to the corporation issuing the stock. But if such dividends had been paid out to the original holder of the shares of stock, and in whose name the shares stood upon the books of the company, before the corporation or its officials received notice of the change of ownership or of the transfer, it would not be liable to the pledgee or assignee of the stock. And in so far as the petition in this case seeks to recover dividends of the character indicated, paid out before notice of the pledgee’s rights, it is demurrable.

2. But in so far as the petition seeks an accounting and the establishment of the pledgee’s right to participate in the undistributed property and *756assets of the corporation, not subject to claims of higher dignity, it is not demurrable; and the court erred in dismissing the case generally.

July 21, 1915.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Cox. Calhoun superior court. June 24, 1914.

*Hatcher & Hatcher,*for plaintiff.

*Pope & Bennet*and *Pottle & Hofmayer,*for defendants.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Jeffrey I. Dreben, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of CVF Technologies Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fiscal fourthquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: August 14, 2006       /s/ Jeffrey I. Dreben         Jeffrey I. Dreben,    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Gexa Corp.

Houston, Texas:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-116722) on Form S-8 of Gexa Corp. of our reports dated March 25, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Gexa Corp.

 
| /s/ HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP |
|-------------------------------|
| HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP     |
|                          |
| Houston, Texas                |
| March 31, 2005                |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1408

FORREST SATTERFIELD,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

JOAN MOORE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JOHNNIE NEWTON; TONYA NEWTON; NANCY CHAPMAN, EEOC; AVA 

MORROW, EEOC; REUBEN DANIELS, JR., EEOC; PAT MCCORY, 

Governor,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00016-MR-DLH)

Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 28, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Forrest Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Forrest Satterfield seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing his action under Title VII of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964 for failure to state a claim. We dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was 

not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on January 24, 2014. The notice of appeal was filed on 

April 24, 2014. Because Satterfield failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the 

appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 32.02
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ David A. CarlsonName:
    
    David A. CarlsonTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    April 27, 2006
 56