alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DOCUMENT NOT IMAGED DUE TO ONE OR MORE REASONS LISTED BELOW:

9 TOO VOLUMINOUS

9 QUALITY NOT LEGIBLE

9 FONT TOO SMALL

9 PHOTOGRAPHS

9 OTHER: __________________________________________________

TO VIEW THE DOCUMENT YOU MUST OBTAIN THE CASE FILE AT THE 

CLERK’S OFFICE. THE CLERK’S OFFICE IS OPEN FROM 8:30 AM. to 4:30 P.M. 

MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY EXCEPT FOR LEGAL HOLIDAYS. TO OBTAIN A 

COPY YOU CAN CALL THE CLERK’S OFFICE SERVICE CENTER AT 

312-435-5699.

Case: 1:03-cr-00978 Document #: 931 Filed: 02/01/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:5311
Order entered June 19, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00163 - CV No. 05 - 18 - 00164 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF M .A.A., A CHILD On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial Dis trict Court

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1 - 09 - 843 and 1 - 15 - 76



### O RDER Before the Court is appellants Sherry and Breena Rhodes’ June 16, 2018 first motion for extension to file briefs

. They seek an extension, in part, because Breena cannot access the electronic copy of the appellate record provided them. We ORDER as follows. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a paper copy of the appellate record in each appeal, to the extent they are different, to Breena Rhodes. We GRANT the exten sion request to the extent we ORDER the brief s be filed no later than July 30, 2018.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-73550) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan of
Wolverine Tube, Inc.; (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-73490)
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors of Wolverine
Tube, Inc.; (iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-87687) pertaining
to the Savings Plan of Wolverine Tube, Inc.; (iv) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-67958) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan of
Wolverine Tube, Inc.; (v) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-67968)
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors of Wolverine
Tube, Inc.; (vi) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-67972) pertaining
to the 2001 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors of Wolverine Tube, Inc.; and
(vii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-108003) pertaining to the
2003 Equity Incentive Plan of Wolverine Tube, Inc. of our report dated February
26, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Wolverine Tube, Inc., as of December 31, 2003 and for the years ended December
31, 2003 and 2002, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

March 10, 2005
Birmingham, Alabama
#### Betty O. Muka, Respondent-Appellant, v Supreme Court of the State of New York et al., Appellants-Respondents.

—Cross appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Fischer, J.), entered February 7, 1985 in Tompkins County, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied defendants’ motion for injunctive relief.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice Robert E. Fischer at Special Term. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:2
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:3
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:4
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:5
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:6
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:7
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:8
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:9
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:10
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:11
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:12
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:13
Case: 1:02-cv-03241 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/02 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   129
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1105645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     750000
<COMMON>                                        291404
<OTHER-SE>                                     3166718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       129
<SALES>                                         967260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                967260
<CGS>                                           823028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1060693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                203279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               32386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (93433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1367439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1460872)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.159)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CEO/CFO Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation, respectively,
certify that, to the best of their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation and subsidiary at the dates and for
the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not
be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                |  |                                                 
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|August 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert H. Gilliam, Jr.                      
|Date            |  | Robert H. Gilliam, Jr.,                         
|                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer           
|                | 
|August 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Bryan M. Lemley                             
|Date            |  | Bryan M. Lemley,                                
|                |  | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Irrevocable Proxy 


          The
undersigned shareholder of Map Financial Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
“Company”), hereby irrevocably (to the fullest extent permitted by law)
appoints the President of the Company, the attorney and proxy of the
undersigned with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to the full
extent of the undersigned’s rights with respect to (i) the outstanding shares
of Company common stock owned of record by the undersigned as of the date of
this proxy, and (ii) any and all other shares of Company common stock or other
securities which the undersigned may acquire on or after the date hereof. The
shares of the Company Common Stock referred to in clauses (i) and (ii) of the
immediately preceding sentence are collectively referred to in this proxy as
the “Shares”. Upon the execution hereof, any prior proxies given by the
undersigned with respect to any of the Shares are hereby revoked and the
undersigned agrees that no subsequent proxies will be given with respect to any
of the Shares.


          This proxy
is irrevocable, is coupled with an interest and is granted in connection with
the Subscription Agreement between the Company and the undersigned. This proxy
shall remain in full force and effect to the fullest extent permitted by law.


          The
attorney and proxy named above will be empowered, and may exercise this proxy,
to vote the Shares at any meeting of the stockholders of the Company, however
called, and in any action by written consent of the stockholders of the
Company.


          This proxy
shall be binding upon the heirs, estate, executors, personal representatives,
successors and assigns of the undersigned, including any transferee of any of
the Shares. If any provision of this proxy or any part of any such provision is
held under any circumstances to be invalid or unenforceable in any
jurisdiction, then (a) such provision or part thereof shall, with respect to
such circumstances and in such jurisdiction, be deemed amended to conform to
applicable laws so as to be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent
possible, (b) the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision or part
thereof under such circumstances and in such jurisdiction shall not affect the
validity or enforceability of such provision or part thereof under any other
circumstances or in any other jurisdiction and (c) the invalidity or
unenforceability of such provision or part thereof under such circumstances and
in such jurisdiction shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the
remainder of such provision or the validity or enforceability of any provision
of this proxy. Each provision of this proxy is separable from every other
provision of this proxy, and each part of each provision of this proxy is
separable from every other part of such provision.


          IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this irrevocable proxy as of the ___ day
of July, 2008.


	
 

	
 


	
 

	



	
 

	
Name:
EXHIBIT 3.2.2

                                 EUROTECH, LTD.

                                 BYLAW AMENDMENT

The undersigned hereby certifies that by action February 23, 2000, the Board of
Directors of Eurotech, Ltd., a District of Columbia corporation, amended the
corporations Bylaws to fix the number of directors to constitute the Board of
Directors at five, so that the first sentence of Article III, Section 1 of such
Bylaws now reads as follows:

         "The number of directors shall be five."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate this 11th day of
May, 2000.



                                                     /s/ Don V. Hahnfeld
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                         Don V. Hahnfeldt
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-56765 and 333-61727) and in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-10697, 333-38871, 333-62275, 333-50942 and
333-49182) of Hyperion Solutions Corporation of our report dated July 25, 2001
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
September 12, 2001
#### In the Matter of Jarvis H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 345]

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about February 17, 2010, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon findings that appellant committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute criminal mischief in the third and fourth degrees and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and which revoked a prior order of disposition, entered on or about September 30, 2008, that had imposed a conditional discharge, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for an aggregate period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence *(People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]). With regard to the petition charging criminal mischief, the presentment agency introduced a properly authenticated surveillance videotape that fully *571depicted the crime. Family Court viewed the tape, observed appellant in the courtroom, and concluded that appellant was the person shown on the tape. There is no basis for disturbing that determination. Appellant’s other challenges to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting the criminal mischief and possession of a controlled substance findings are without merit.

The court properly denied appellant’s suppression motion. The police saw appellant and another person engaging in a transfer of small objects that was suggestive of a drug transaction. This provided, at least, a founded suspicion of criminality warranting a common-law inquiry, and when appellant fled the level of suspicion increased to reasonable suspicion justifying pursuit *(see e.g. People v Church,*217 AD2d 444, 445 [1995], *lv denied*87 NY2d 920 [1996]).

The disposition was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection, given appellant’s repeated delinquent acts *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]).

We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining claims. Concur — Tom, J.P., Catterson, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
#### In re FOSTER AVE., BOROUGH OF BROOKLYN, IN CITY OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

In the matter of the application of the city of New York relative to acquiring title to the lands, etc., required for the purpose of opening Foster avenue, etc., in the borough of Brooklyn.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 104 N. Y. Supp. 71.
**EXHIBIT        32**

**CERTIFICATE        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND **

**PRINCIPAL        FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY        ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

|  | 1. | The                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial results of operations of the                    Company. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Alan Doyle                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Alan                        DoylePresident                        (Chief Executive Officer),Treasurer                        (Principal Financial Officer)November                        29, 2005 |   |   |        |
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cotton Ginning Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Cotton Ginning Research People & Locations







Rita D Styles
                        Cotton Ginning Research

                        




                        
                        Physical Science Technician
                        Phone: (662) 686-3104
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of George Watson, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 388]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

During the monitoring of an outside telephone call made by petitioner, petitioner was overheard asking the other party to connect the call to a third party. While speaking to the third party, petitioner made a number of references that were determined by correction personnel to be gang-related. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from making third-party calls and engaging in gang-related activities. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Petitioner argues that the part of the determination finding him guilty of engaging in gang-related activities is not supported by substantial evidence.* We disagree. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of its author, who was experienced in identifying gang-related codes and terminology, amply supports the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Vaello v*
      *1318
      *Connolly,*84 AD3d 1624, 1625 [2011], *appeal dismissed*17 NY3d 854 [2011]; *Matter of Green v Bradt,*79 AD3d 1566, 1567 [2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 709 [2011]). Petitioner also claims that he did not have sufficient notice of the disciplinary rule prohibiting gang-related activities because it was not in the rule book given to him at the time he entered prison. Although that appears to have been the case, we reject petitioner’s argument inasmuch as a copy of the rule, as revised, was distributed to all inmates, presumably including petitioner, while he was incarcerated at another correctional facility. Furthermore, we find no merit to petitioner’s claim that the rule violation deprived him of his 1st Amendment rights *(see Matter of Hizbullah v Bezio,*75 AD3d 714, 715 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 712 [2010]; *Matter of Mercado v Selsky,*47 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2008], *lv denied*10 NY3d 713 [2008]).

Peters, PJ., Spain, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to the charge of making a third-party call and is therefore precluded from challenging that finding *(see Matter of Lamere v Fischer, 87*AD3d 768, 768 [2011]).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6348

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHERMAN L. WELLONS, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-251, CA-96-907-5) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Sherman L. Wellons, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wellons , Nos. CR-91-251; CA-96-907-5 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 54 Filed: 03/25/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:301
Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 54 Filed: 03/25/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:302