alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|  | (3) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (4) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                  |                                             |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                        | /s/ James              A.              Meer |
|   | James              A. Meer                                            |
|   | Chief                Financial OfficerMarch                  16, 2007 |

----
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Soil Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Carl P. Ranno, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno
---------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Chief Financial Officer
May 21, 2007
**EXHIBIT32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe quarterly report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Robert Gary,Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ J. ROBERT GARY                 |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Robert Gary                     |
| Senior Vice President, Finance and |
| Administration                     |
| (Principal Financial Officer)      |
| December 5, 2006                   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LHS GROUP, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          74,716
<SECURITIES>                                    56,128
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,890
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,092
<PP&E>                                          44,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,778
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           590
<OTHER-SE>                                     226,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   299,079
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,453
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,490)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,999
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,719
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 11

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings
per share:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         (Expressed in U.S. Currency)
                                                         Three months ended March 31,
                                                          2004                2003
                                                      ------------         ------------
<S>                                                   <C>                  <C>
Numerator:
Net Income (loss)                                     $    246,379         $   (628,717)
Dividends on Series A preferred stock                         (770)                (763)
Dividends on Series B preferred stock                            -              (83,466)
Dividends on Series C preferred stock                       (5,838)                   -
                                                      ------------         ------------

Numerator for basic and diluted loss per
share loss available to common shareholders           $    239,771         $   (712,946)
                                                      ------------         ------------

Denominator:
Denominator for basic loss per share-
weighted average shares outstanding                     11,242,663           10,692,674
Effect of dilutive securities                            1,223,024                    -
Warrants                                                   952,784                    -
                                                      ------------         ------------

Dilutive potential common shares denominator
for diluted earnings (loss) per share adjusted
weighter-average shares and assumed conversion          13,418,471           10,692,674

                                                      ------------         ------------

Basic earnings (loss) per share                       $       0.02         $      (0.07)
                                                      ------------         ------------

Diluted earnings (loss) per share                     $       0.02         $      (0.07)
                                                      ------------         ------------
</TABLE>
Case: 1:03-cv-08762 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/03/03 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-08762 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/03/03 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-08762 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/03/03 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-08762 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/03/03 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-08762 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/03/03 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-08762 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/03/03 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-08762 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/03/03 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:1
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Daniel Knutson, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Land O’Lakes, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2006         By:       /s/ Daniel Knutson   Daniel Knutson   Senior Vice President and
#### Paul Lasini, Respondent, v Elise Lasini, Appellant.

In an action for a divorce based upon cruel and inhuman treatment, the defendant wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Weiner, J.), dated July 20, 1984, which denied her motion for summary judgment.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The allegations of the verified complaint and verified bill of particulars raise factual issues as to whether defendant has subjected plaintiff to cruel and inhuman treatment *(see, e.g., Pfeil v Pfeil,*100 AD2d 725; *Frederick v Frederick,*92 AD2d 1058). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Genetics Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Crop Genetics Research People







Kristi Neely Jordan    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TECHNICIAN


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00096

- CR

W ARREN S CROGGIN J R

. A / K / A

W ARREN S CROGGIN A / K / A W ARREN

S CROGGINS J R

. A / K / A W ARREN

S CROGGINS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EX AS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Criminal

Court No. 5

of Denton County (F18

- 1295

- 362)

January 30 , 2020

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Restaurant Properties,Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, Stacy M. Riffe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

          (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

          (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Stacy M.  Riffe      |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| Stacy M.  Riffe          |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| May 14, 2003             |

 

 

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard G. Lamica, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 792]—

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), rendered June 6, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts).

Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted pursuant to a superior court information charging him with various crimes stemming from his sexual contact with two young girls — one of whom was his then seven-year-old relative. In full satisfaction thereof, defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and waived his right to appeal all matters except, insofar as is relevant here, those pertaining to sentencing.* Defendant thereafter was sentenced — in accordance with the parameters set forth in the plea agreement — to consecutive prison terms of six years, together with a $5,000 fine, upon each of the three counts. Defendant now appeals, contending that the consecutive sentence imposed upon counts 2 and 3 is illegal and, further, that the aggregate prison term (18 years) and fine imposed ($15,000) are harsh and excessive.

We disagree. Although defendant’s challenge to the legality of his sentence survives both his guilty plea and his limited waiver of the right to appeal *(see People v Brennan,*62 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2009], *lv denied*13 NY3d 794 [2009]), we find it to be lacking in merit. The eight-year-old victim’s statement to the police, together with the admissions made by defendant during the course of the presentence investigation *(cf. People v Good-band,*291 AD2d 584, 585 [2002]; *People v Lockenwitz,*287 AD2d 891, 891 [2001]; *People v Scandell,*143 AD2d 423, 425 [1988], *lv denied*73 NY2d 790 [1988], *cert denied*489 US 1080 [1989]), are sufficient to establish that defendant committed “two separate and distinct acts” *(People v Laureano,*87 NY2d 640, 644 [1996]) against the victim in question. Accordingly, County Court’s imposition of consecutive sentences upon counts 2 and 3 was entirely proper.

Finally, under the circumstances presented and given the *1566heinous nature of the crimes at issue, we discern no basis upon which to disturb either the sentence or the fine imposed by County Court *(see People Brickey,*3 AD3d 603, 604 [2004], *lv denied*2 NY3d 737 [2004]; *People v Oliver,*276 AD2d 930, 931 [2000]).

Lahtinen, *J.P.,*Spain, McCarthy, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*

 The first count of the superior court information involved conduct committed against defendant’s relative; the second and third counts related to the second victim, who was then eight years old.
Kathryn Tassinari, OSB # 80115 

Mark A. Manning, OSB # 00311 

HARDER, WELLS, BARON &MANNING,P.C. 

474 Willamette Street 

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 686-1969 

kathrynt50@ comcast.net 

Of Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 

LENA M. NAVARRO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER, 

Social Security Administration , 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

-----~D"-'e=fe=n=d=a=n=t. ____ ) 

Case No. 6:14-cv-00811-AA 

ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY 

FEES PURSUANT TO BAJA 

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 

amount of $4,553.15 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 

(BAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this award shall be paid via check made payable to 

Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorneys at Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C., 474 

Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, the award shall be made 

payable to Plaintiff's attorney if the commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the 

government through the federal treasury offset program. There are no costs or expenses to be 

paid herein. 

Dated this -'----'"---day of August 2015. 

PRESENTED BY: 

sf Kathryn Tassinari 

Harder, Wells, Baron & Manning, P.C. 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 

U.S. District Judge/Magistrate 

Case 6:14-cv-00811-AA Document 25 Filed 08/18/15 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Written StatementPursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

** **

The undersigned, John A. Elwood, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Meade Instruments Corp. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, hereby certifies that:

 

(i)   theForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2008 of the Company,as amended by Amendment No. 1, (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(ii)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 27, 2009

 
| By:      | /s/  JOHN A. ELWOOD                                        |     |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| * * | *Vice  President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer* | * * |

 

----
Exhibit 31(b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Herman Roth, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Globus
International Resources Corp. for the nine months ended June 30, 2004;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information;and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 2, 2004

/s/ HERMAN ROTH
-----------------------------

                                 Page 18 of 19