alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Sugarcane Research: Houma, LA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Houma, Louisiana Sugarcane Research People & Locations







Christopher Lee Adams
                        Sugarcane Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician
                        Phone: (985) 872-5042
                        
                        
                        Fax: (985) 868-8369(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 13.4

 

Credicorp Ltd.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.          Iam the Chief Financial Officer of Credicorp Ltd. (the “Company”).

 

2.          Tomy knowledge:

 

(A)        TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 accompanying this Certification, in the form filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(B)        Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Conway, Appellant.

—Kane, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Harris, J.), rendered July 10, 1984, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea arrangement, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree. He was then sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate prison term of 2 to 4 years. This was the bargained-for sentence.

On appeal, defendant contends that his plea should be vacated. However, having failed to move to vacate his plea before County Court, defendant has not preserved the issue for our review as a matter of law *(see, People v Pascale,*48 NY2d 997, 998; *People v Bell,*47 NY2d 839, 840; *People v Vicks,*91 AD2d 1052), and reversal is not warranted in the interest of justice on this record.

We have examined the other issues raised in this appeal *933and find them to be without merit. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2022

- 3534

_____________________________ S HANIQUA A NDERSON , Appellant,

v.

B APTIST H EALTH C ARE C ORPORATION , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

.

March 26, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R OBERTS , and R OWE , JJ ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Chad E. Levy of Law Offices of Levy & Levy, P.A., Coral Springs
, for Appellant.

Russell F. Van Sickle of Beggs & Lane, Pensacola
, for Appellee.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1218

To assure the integrity of information, transportation and telecommunications

upon the arrival of the year 2000.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 24, 1997

Mr. KERREY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To assure the integrity of information, transportation and

telecommunications upon the arrival of the year 2000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Millennium Act’’.

5 SEC. 101. TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS.

6 (a) The Federal Communications Commission shall

7 initiate a proceeding to evaluate the potential dangers to

8 the nation’s telecommunications networks from to soft9 ware and systems which are unable to effectively toll the
2

S 1218 IS

1 passage of time from December 31, 1999 to January 1,

2 2000.

3 (b) The Commission shall make necessary and appro4 priate regulatory changes within their jurisdiction to en5 sure the integrity of the Nation’s telecommunications net6 works.

7 SEC. 102. PERSONAL COMPUTERS.

8 The National Institute of Standards and Technology

9 shall evaluate the potential risks to information stored on

10 personal computers from to software and systems which

11 are unable to effectively toll the passage of time from De12 cember 31, 1999 to January 1, 2000 and shall take nec13 essary and appropriate actions within its jurisdiction to

14 propose solutions and inform the public.

15 SEC. 103. TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS.

16 The Secretary of Transportation shall initiate a com17 prehensive plan to assure that computer hardware and

18 software in transportation systems, which are unable to

19 effectively toll the passage of time from December 31,

20 1999 to January 1, 2000 do not create a safety risk to

21 transportation workers and the general public. Should a

22 risk to safety be identified, the Department shall take nec23 essary and appropriate measures to assure safety and in24 form the public of such risks.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LHS GROUP, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          41,651
<SECURITIES>                                    58,813
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,433
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,737
<PP&E>                                          27,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              529
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,202
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,328
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,136)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,494
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,988
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
DOCUMENT NOT IMAGED DUE TO ONE OR MORE REASONS

LISTED BELOW:

< TOO VOLUMINOUS

< QUALITY NOT LEGIBLE

< FONT TOO SMALL

< PHOTOGRAPHS

SEE CASE FILE 

Case: 1:02-cv-03973 Document #: 188 Filed: 08/14/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1305
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Secure Computing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Steinkopf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|/s/    TIMOTHY J.
STEINKOPF                                                         
|Timothy J. Steinkopf Senior Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer
|

March 5, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1031 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1031

 To protect Federal law enforcement officers who intervene in certain 
          situations to protect life or prevent bodily injury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 1997

  Mr. Grassley (for himself and Mr. D'Amato) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To protect Federal law enforcement officers who intervene in certain 
          situations to protect life or prevent bodily injury.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Law Enforcement Officers' 
Good Samaritan Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WHO INTERVENE IN 
              CERTAIN SITUATIONS TO PROTECT LIFE OR TO PREVENT BODILY 
              INJURY.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``bodily injury'' has the meaning given that 
        term in section 1365(g) of title 18, United States Code;
            (2) the term ``crime of violence'' has the meaning given 
        that term in section 16 of title 18, United States Code;
            (3) the term ``law enforcement officer'' has the meaning 
        given that term in section 8401 of title 5, United States Code; 
        and
            (4) the term ``serious bodily injury'' has the meaning 
        given that term in section 1365(g) of title 18, United States 
        Code.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, for purposes of chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code, a law 
enforcement officer shall be construed to be acting within the scope of 
his or her office or employment, if the officer takes any action, 
including the use of force, that is determined by the officer to be 
necessary to--
            (1) protect an individual in the presence of the officer 
        from the imminent infliction of serious bodily injury;
            (2) provide immediate assistance to an individual who has 
        suffered or who is threatened with serious bodily injury; or
            (3) prevent the escape of any individual whom the officer 
        reasonably believes to have committed in the presence of the 
        officer a crime of violence.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco Antonio VELEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7615.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 16, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 26, 2011.

Marco Antonio Velez, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marco Antonio Velez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Velez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Document

Exhibit 10.3

OMNIBUS AMENDMENT TO
PARTICIPATION NOTICE AND AGREEMENTS UNDER THE 
SUMMIT MATERIALS, INC. EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN 


    THIS OMNIBUS AMENDMENT (this “Omnibus Amendment”), dated as of May 18, 2021, amends each Participation Notice and Agreement under the Summit Materials, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (as such plan may be amended and/or restated from time to time, the “Severance Plan”) that is with a Tier 2 Participant and is outstanding as of the date hereof, pursuant to the authorization and approval by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Summit Materials, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to action taken by the Compensation Committee at a meeting held on the date hereof, as follows. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaning given such term in the Severance Plan. 


1.The definition of “Post-Termination Period” set forth in Appendix A (Restrictive Covenants) attached to such Participation Notice and Agreement is hereby amended and restated from “twelve (12) months following the Participant’s Termination” to “twenty-four (24) months following the Participant’s Termination”. 


2.All references in such Participation Notice and Agreement to the “Participation Notice and Agreement” shall mean such Participation Notice and Agreement as amended by this Omnibus Amendment. 


3.All provisions of such Participation Notice and Agreement that are not expressly amended by this Omnibus Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. 




[Signature page follows]











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Omnibus Amendment to be executed by its authorized agent, as of the day and year first above written. 




                            SUMMIT MATERIALS, INC. 




                            By: /s/ Christopher B. Gaskill
                            Name: Christopher B. Gaskill
                                     Title: EVP, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary


[Signature Page to Omnibus Amendment to Participation Notice and Agreements
under the Summit Materials, Inc. Executive Severance Plan]
exhibit101






CERTAIN INFORMATION, IDENTIFIED BY [*****], HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM  THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY  CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. Exhibit 10.1 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LOAN ORIGINATION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LOAN ORIGINATION AGREEMENT (this  “Amendment”) is made as of April 16, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) by and between GreenSky,  LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Servicer”), and BMO Harris Bank N.A., a national  banking association (“Lender”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein  shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Loan Origination Agreement (as defined  herein). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Lender and Servicer have previously entered into that certain Loan  Origination Agreement dated as of November 5, 2018, as amended (collectively, the “Loan  Origination Agreement”);  WHEREAS, Lender and Servicer desire to amend the Loan Origination Agreement as set  forth herein;  NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of  which are hereby acknowledged, Lender and Servicer hereby agree as follows: 1. The Loan Origination Agreement is hereby amended as follows: a. Section 2.01(a)(ii) of the Loan Origination Agreement is hereby deleted in its  entirety and the following is substituted in lieu thereof: “(ii) Commitment Amount.  Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, during  the Term of this Loan Origination Agreement including any renewal of the Term and for  such longer periods as specified in Article VI, Lender will fund Loans originated as part  of the GreenSky® Program that meet the Underwriting Criteria up to a maximum of  $[*****] in aggregate Outstanding Principal Balances owned by Lender at any time (the  “Commitment Amount”); provided, however, [*****].  The Commitment Amount and  the monthly loan origination limit may be further increased by written agreement  between the Parties.” b. Section 2.01(c)(iii) of the Loan Origination Agreement is hereby deleted in its  entirety and the following is substituted in lieu thereof: “(iii) [*****]”  2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Loan Origination Agreement shall  remain in full force and effect. 





 






Classification: Internal Use 2 3. This Amendment may be executed and delivered by Lender and Servicer in  facsimile or PDF format and in any number of separate counterparts, all of which, when  delivered, shall together constitute one and the same document. [Signature page follows] 





 






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first  above written. SERVICER: GREENSKY, LLC By:     /s/ Timothy D. Kaliban Name: Timothy D. Kaliban Title: President LENDER: BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. By:     /s/ Mark Shulman Name: Mark Shulman Title: Head Consumer Lending & Chief CRA Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED SHERMAN DOUGHTRY ,

Appellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 1677 LT Case No. 2021

- 303880

- MMDB STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed July 25, 2023 3.850 Appeal from the County Court f or Volus ia County, Dav id H. Foxman, Judge. Sherma n Doughtry, Daytona Beach, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and D aniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. MAKAR, JAY and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.02
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Lizabeth H. ZlatkusName:
    
    Lizabeth H. ZlatkusTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    August 4, 2005
 48