alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1

                  VARI-LITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
          COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
        FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND 1998
            (In thousands except share data)
<TABLE>
                                                            1997       1998
                                                            ----       ----
<S>                                                         <C>        <C>
Net income (loss)......................................       $819      ($421)

Weighted average shares outstanding....................  5,789,221  7,800,003

Dilutive effect of stock warrants after application of 
 treasury stock method..................................    19,473          0

Shares used in calculating diluted income (loss) 
 per share.............................................  5,808,694  7,800,003

Basic net income per share.............................      $0.14     ($0.05)

Diluted net income per share...........................      $0.14     ($0.05)
</TABLE>

                                       18
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00187-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE 

GUARDIANSHIP OF MAY K. JONES, AN 

INCAPACITATED PERSON

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Probate Court

of Denton County (PR-2014-00591-01)

April 16, 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
Case: 1:02-cv-03310 Document #: 253 Filed: 12/21/06 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:3700
Case: 1:02-cv-03310 Document #: 253 Filed: 12/21/06 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:3701
Case: 1:02-cv-03310 Document #: 253 Filed: 12/21/06 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:3702
Case: 1:02-cv-03310 Document #: 253 Filed: 12/21/06 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:3703
Case: 1:02-cv-03310 Document #: 253 Filed: 12/21/06 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:3704
Case: 1:02-cv-03310 Document #: 253 Filed: 12/21/06 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:3705
**Exhibit 12.2**
**CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Maurizio Dessolis*,*certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of De Rigo S.p.A.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: June ...., 2005
/s/ Maurizio Dessolis
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Federal Trade Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:03−cv−03904

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

Kevin Trudeau, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, May 2, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing held on

5/2/2013. Depositions are expected to proceed. FTC's motion to compel [626] Marc Lane

to disclose information is granted on an attorneys'−eyes−only basis. Mr. Lane's deposition

will remain under seal until further order of court. Status hearing set for 5/13/2013 at 3:30

p.m. Mailed notice (gds)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
#### MSCI Inc. et al., Appellants, v Philip Jacob, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[946 NYS2d 575]

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered November 14, 2011, which granted defendant Philip Jacob’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ seventh cause of action alleging that he violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) (18 USC § 1030), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly determined that plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action under the CFAA. Even assuming the truth of the allegations in the complaint *(see generally Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), the CFAA does not encompass Jacob’s misappropriation of information that he lawfully accessed while working for plaintiffs or misuse of work computers in violation of their computer policies *(see United States v Nosal,*676 F3d 854 [9th Cir 2012]; *see also University Sports Pub. Co. v Playmakers Media Co.,*725 F Supp 2d 378, 385 [SD NY 2010]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
#### Cochran *v.*Weaver.

April 16, 1915.

Rehearing denied July 3, 1915.

Atkinson, J.

1. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant the movant additional time in which to perfect an amendment to the motion for new trial.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*642Processioning. Before Judge Patterson. Gilmer superior court. May 22, 1914.

*George D. Anderson*and *A. N. Edwards,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. H. Burtz,*contra.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                      |   |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  August 4, 2009 | /s/ ROBERT E. MEAD        |   |
|                             | Robert E. Mead            |   |
|                             | Chairman of the Board and |   |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer   |   |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-00864, 333-06779, 333-08535, and Form S-3 No. 333-45151) of
GelTex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 9, 1998 with respect
to the financial statements of GelTex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 1998
# CE2004065EN.01015701.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/157 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/157

---

(2004/C 65 E/172)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2458/03

by Concepció Ferrer (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(23 July 2003)

Subject:   High-speed rail network in southern Europe

Subject:

The rail links Genoa-Marseille-Barcelona-Valencia and Lisbon-Madrid-Barcelona-Lyon-Paris are of major importance for the southern European economy. However, repeated delays are holding back the completion of the line between Madrid and Lleida/Lérida, which should have been inaugurated at the end of 2002. This stretch is an essential part of the high-speed link that will connect both Madrid and Barcelona to the French frontier. Meanwhile, the French government appears unwilling to upgrade the stretch between Nîmes and the Spanish frontier to high-speed status. What action does the Commission intend to take to ensure the development of this trans-European network in accordance with the Treaties?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(12 September 2003)

(12 September 2003)

The Community is using the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) budget to help finance studies and works with a view to increasing the capacity of the existing Perpignan-Nîmes line to cope with the extra traffic which will result from the entry into service of the new Figueras-Perpignan line (scheduled for 2008-2009).

It is also contributing, again from the TEN-T budget, to the preliminary studies for the construction of an entirely new line between the Spanish border and Nîmes, which would enter into service in stages between 2010 and 2015 depending on the degree of saturation of each section of the existing line.

Accordingly, if this project has fallen behind its initial schedule whereby the entire line was to have entered into service in 2010 (and the Commission can only regret such a delay), it must be stressed that implementation of these projects remains entirely the responsibility of the Member States. In the context of the High-Level Group chaired by Mr Karel Van Miert, the Commission sought and obtained firm commitments from the French authorities that they would keep to the dates indicated above.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John H. Gray, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John H. Gray                                  
|                                                  
|John H. Gray                                      
|Senior Vice President, Finance  and Administration
|(Principal Financial Officer)                     
|December 15, 2003
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research: Leetown, WV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Leetown, West Virginia Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research People & Locations







Jenea  McGowan
                        Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker
                        Phone: (304) 724-8340
                         ext. 2172
                        
                        Fax: (304) 725-0351(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 1 of 30 PageID #:481
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 2 of 30 PageID #:482
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 3 of 30 PageID #:483
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 4 of 30 PageID #:484
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 5 of 30 PageID #:485
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 6 of 30 PageID #:486
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 7 of 30 PageID #:487
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 8 of 30 PageID #:488
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 9 of 30 PageID #:489
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 10 of 30 PageID #:490
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 11 of 30 PageID #:491
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 12 of 30 PageID #:492
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 13 of 30 PageID #:493
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 14 of 30 PageID #:494
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 15 of 30 PageID #:495
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 16 of 30 PageID #:496
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 17 of 30 PageID #:497
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 18 of 30 PageID #:498
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 19 of 30 PageID #:499
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 20 of 30 PageID #:500
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 21 of 30 PageID #:501
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 22 of 30 PageID #:502
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 23 of 30 PageID #:503
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 24 of 30 PageID #:504
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 25 of 30 PageID #:505
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 26 of 30 PageID #:506
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 27 of 30 PageID #:507
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 28 of 30 PageID #:508
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 29 of 30 PageID #:509
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/21/02 Page 30 of 30 PageID #:510
#### Miller *et al. v.*Butler.

Hill, J.

1. A creditor and the settlor of a trust estate had mutual actions pending against each other; and they were all tried under an equity ease, in which a decree was rendered, fixing the title of the land involved, and also giving to the creditor a personal decree against the settlor of the trust estate for a large amount of money. In a suit to set aside this judgment, by the beneficiaries of the trust estate, the settlor or his legal representative is a necessary party. See *Miller*v. *Butler,*137 *Ga.*90 (72 S. E. 913).

*569June 23, 1915.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Freeman. Troup superior court. February 9, 1914.

*W. S. Terrell,*for plaintiffs. *F. M. Longley,*for defendant.

2. The present ease, except as to the question of proper parties, in nowise differs from the former (just cited), other than that it alleged that the settlor’s estate is insolvent. This does not relieve the plaintiffs from the necessity of making his personal representative a party.

3. The court passed an order requiring the plaintiffs to make the administrator of the settlor a party within four months. Instead of complying with the order, the plaintiffs offered to amend by making as parties, in lieu of the representative of the estate of the deceased, certain remote heirs of the decedent. If the decree were to be vacated, the creditor would be entitled to be restored to his former status, so that in his suit he could obtain a judgment against the estate of the settlor of the trust. Many of the heirs proposed to be made parties were heirs twice removed from- the deceased settlor, with intervening estates, and the creditor would not be in a position to take any judgment against the heirs, as the facts alleged are not sufficient to entitle him to a judgment against them. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 223 Filed: 04/20/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1940
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.’s333-128990, 333-114793, 333-109641 and 333-76544) of IDM Pharma, Inc. and in the related Prospectusand in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.’s 333-128178, 333-117116, 333-107416, 333-87266,333-64238, 333-63950, 333-44852, 333-87759, 333-62437, 333-11577, 333-96302, 333-81236, 333-44336)pertaining to the 1989 Stock Plan, 1994 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, As Amended, 1997Stock Option Plan, 2000 Stock Plan, As Amended, 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, As Amended,Employee Stock Purchase Plan For Employees Of IDM S.A. and the IDM Pharma, Inc. Option LiquidityAgreements of IDM Pharma, Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of IDM Pharma, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2005.         /s/ Ernst & Young LLPSan Diego, California
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            16,563
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         160
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  20,650
<CASH>                                              57
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               5,747
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,633
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  4,547
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 47
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  21,267
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           64,279
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,633
<PREMIUMS>                                       2,058
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,097
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                       1,867
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        260
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    340
<INCOME-TAX>                                       121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                219
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       219
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.66
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

                                       

</TABLE>