alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.76


April 30, 1998

Mr. Ben Noble
3261 Lenox Road, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30324

         RE:      Interest Agreement - False River, LLC

Dear Mr. Noble:

         This letter will confirm our agreement to pay you ten percent (10%)
interest on all of your False River, LLC investments until such time that those
investments are re-paid out of proceeds from the sale of any and all
distribution rights associated with the feature film currently titled False
River. This agreement is entered into in consideration of your commitment to be
the initial and largest investor in False River, LLC.


Very Truly Yours,


/s/  Steven D. Brown
---------------------------------
Steven D. Brown
Chairman and CEO
American Artists Film Corporation
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Allan Rowley, Chief Financial Officer of MGTCapital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)    the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)    the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|               | By:                      | /s/ ALLAN ROWLEY |
|--------------------|--------------------------|------------------|
|               | Allan Rowley             |
|               | Chief Financial  Officer |
|               |                     |             |
| April 2, 2009 |                     |             |
|                    |                          |                  |  |

 

E-5

----
Minute Order Form (06/97)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

@

Name of Assigned Judge James B. Moran Sitting Judge if Other
or Magistrate Judge than Assigned Judge
CASE NUMBER 02 C 4411 DATE 8/2/2002
CASE Philip S. Jackson vs. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc. etal
TITLE

MOTION:

{in the following box (a) indicate the party filing the motion, c.g., plaintiff, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the nature

of the motion being presented.)

Memorandum Opinion and Order

DOCKET ENTRY:

ql) Oo Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]

(2) Oo Brief in support of motion due

(3) ia) Answer brief to motion due___. Reply to answer brief due.

(4) oO Ruling/Hearing on setfor at,

(5) Oo Status hearing{held/continued to} [set for/re-set for]on___—ssetfor_ at

(6) oO Pretrial conference{held/continued to} [set for/re-set for]on__——ssetfor_— at

(7) ai Trial[set for/re-set for]on___at

(8) Oo {Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continued to| at

(9) oO This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agreement/pursuant to]

OOFRCP4(m) OGeneral Rule21 OFRCP41(a)(1) Ci FRCP41(a)(2).

(10) Ml [Other docket entry] Enter Memorandum Opinion and Order. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.(Glenayre)
has moved to intervene and to enjoin plaintiffs suit against customers for their use of Glenayre
equipment. We grant both motions and enter and continue its petition for costs.

ql) ff {For further detail see order attached to the original minute order. ]

No notices required, advised in open court.

No notices required. umber of potes

Notices mailed by judge's staff.

Notified counsel by telephone. AUG 06 2002
uv | Docketing to mail notices.

Mail AO 450 form.

Copy to judge/magistrate judge.

}]

date mailed notice

courtroom
WAH deputy's
initials

Daté/time received in
central Clerk's Office railing deputy ins



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ci
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DOCKE j ED
EASTERN DIVISION
AUG & 2002

PHILIP S. JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
No. 02 C 4411

vs.

AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.,
et al.,

wevevererveye ve ee

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Glenayre Electronics, Inc. (Glenayre) has moved to intervene and to enjoin plaintiff's
suit against customers for their use of Glenayre equipment. We grant both motions and enter
and continue its petition for costs.
. The motion to intervene is largely for the purpose of having standing to seek injunctive
relief, and plaintiff does not, apparently, have any objection to that. The motion to enjoin
arises from the order Judge Leinenweber entered on May 31, 2002, in case no. 02 C 256. We
agree with Glenayre that Judge Leinenweber ruled that no customer suits should go forward
until the infringement issues before him had been determined. To the extent plaintiff has

claims of infringement for the use of equipment or components not supplied by Glenayre, he

can proceed,

JAMES B. MORAN
ior Judge, U. S. District Court

Qu, A_, 2002.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000595 18-NOV-2015 08:55 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Pericom Semiconductor Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-
51229 and 333-43934 of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation on Form S-8 of our
reports dated July 25, 2000 ( September 8, 2000 as to the third paragraph of
Note 1), included and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2000.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
September 27, 2000
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2003 (the "Report"), I, John E. Gherty,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                   By  /s/ John E. Gherty
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   John E. Gherty
                                                   President
                                                   and Chief Executive Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Great Basin Rangelands Research: Reno, NV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Newsletter
                        Volume 1
                                    Volume 2Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Arid Lands Ecologyheadline bar arid lands ecology lab


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>
 
                         AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE
                           DATED AS OF JULY 31, 1997


     This notice hereby amends the due date of that certain Promissory Note
dated October 3, 1997 by and between American Artists Film Corporation (therein
called "Obligor") and Glen C. Warren, (therein called "Holder") to August 1,
1998.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this amendment to be duly
executed under the seal on the date and year first above written.

                                            "OBLIGOR"


                                       By: /s/ J. Eric Van Atta
                                          -------------------------------- 
                                          American Artists Film Corporation
                                          1245 Fowler St., N.W.
                                          Atlanta, Georgia 30318

"HOLDER"


/s/ Glen C. Warren
---------------------
Glen C. Warren
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Amy J. St. Eve Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 03 CR 978 - 2 DATE 9/20/2011

CASE

TITLE

United States vs. Muhammad Salah

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Motion hearing held on 9/20/11. Defendant’s motion for early termination of supervised release [1092] is

granted. 

Docketing to mail notices.

00:03

 Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

KF

03CR978 - 2 United States vs. Muhammad Salah Page 1 of 1

Case: 1:03-cr-00978 Document #: 1094 Filed: 09/20/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:9411
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August                10, 2007 | /s/                ROBERT E. MEAD                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                             | Robert                E. Mead                       |   |
|                                             | Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:286
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:287
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:288
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:289
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:290
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:291
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:292
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:293
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:294
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:295
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:296
Case: 1:03-cv-02695 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/23/06 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:297
Exhibit 23.1 

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

Broadway Financial Corporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements(No. 333-17331 and No. 333-102138) on Form S-8 of Broadway Financial Corporation of our report dated February 5, 2004, except as to footnote 20, which is as of March 18, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Broadway Financialcorporation as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive earnings, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31,2003 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Broadway Financial Corporation. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California

March 30, 2004
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 132960 & (61) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132960 COA: 263180 Wayne CC: 05-001102-01 05-001104-01 CETRIC DEONDRAE SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED.

s0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________
No. 95-60366 Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ANGELA STAFFNEY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:94-CR-69-LN

- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant appeals from her guilty plea conviction and sentence

for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). She contends that the district

court erred in declining to apply a four-level decrease in her base

offense level for her role as a minimal participant under U.S.S.G.

§ 3B1.2(a).

We have reviewed the record, the briefs, and the district

court's oral ruling and perceive no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

AFFIRMED.
----

Action brought on 22 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-180/05)

(2005/C 171/12)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 22 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Wouter Wils, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

As long as the Grand Ducal regulation implementing Article 65 of the Law of 18 April 2001 on copyright has not been adopted and has not come into force, the remuneration for public lending, required by Article 5(1) of Directive 92/100 as a condition for permitting derogation from the exclusive right laid down in Article 1 of Directive 92/100, is not paid. Articles 1 and 5 of Directive 92/100 have therefore not been correctly applied.

----

(1)  OJ 1992 L 346, p. 61

----
---

Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry J. White, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 7, 2010
/s/ HARRY J. WHITE, JR.Harry J. White, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
EXHIBIT 11

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share:                                        (Expressed in U.S. Currency)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three months ended September 30,      Nine months ended September 30,
                                                         2003               2002              2003               2002
                                                    ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------
<S>                                                 <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>
Numerator:
Net Income (loss)                                   $   (608,555)      $   (759,819)      $(1,681,635)       $   (792,855)
Dividends on Series A preferred stock                       (780)              (780)            (2,315)            (2,315)
Dividends on Series B preferred stock                    (85,321)           (85,321)          (253,180)          (186,036)
                                                    ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------

Numerator for basic and diluted loss per
share loss available to common shareholders         $   (694,656)      $   (845,920)      $(1,937,130)       $   (981,206)
                                                    ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------

Denominator:
Denominator for basic loss per share-
weighted average shares outstanding                   10,740,174         10,519,907         10,713,140         10,300,395
Effect of dilutive securities                                  -                  -                  -                  -
Warrants                                                       -                  -                  -                  -
                                                    ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------

Dilutive potential common shares denominator
for diluted earnings (loss) per share adjusted
weighter-average shares and assumed conversion        10,740,174         10,519,907         10,713,140         10,300,395
                                                    ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------

Basic earnings (loss) per share                     $      (0.06)      $      (0.08)      $      (0.18)      $      (0.10)
                                                    ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------

Diluted earnings (loss) per share                   $      (0.06)      $      (0.08)      $      (0.18)      $      (0.10)
                                                    ------------       ------------       ------------       ------------
</TABLE>
# C_2019238EN.01002801.xml

| 15.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/28

---

Action brought on 27 May 2019 — Maternus v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (Jokers WILD Casino)

(Case T-321/19)

(2019/C 238/33)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Maternus GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Zöbisch and R. Drozdz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Lübbecke, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark Jokers WILD Casino in black, red, yellow and white — EU trade mark No 9 515 321

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2019 in Case R 803/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---