43168 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 

19See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

20For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

21See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

22See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Austria, Belgium, France, the 

Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for 

France, the Federal Republic of Germany, the 

Republic of Korea and Taiwan, and Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 82 FR 24096, 24098 (May 25, 2017). 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries.19

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales. Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

rate is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

average of the cash deposit rates 

calculated for Industeel and NLMK 

Belgium, excluding any rates that are 

zero, de minimis, or determined entirely 

based on adverse facts available. The 

final results of this review shall be the 

basis for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by companies included in these final 

results of review for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.20

Further, if we continue to find, in the 

final results, that Dillinger and Industeel 

France had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended 

entries that entered under their AD case 

number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) at 

the all-others rate, if there is no rate for 

the intermediate company(ies) involved 

in the transaction. 

Consistent with its recent notice,21

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for the exporters listed 

above will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review, except if 

the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for companies not participating 

in this review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific 

cash deposit rate published for the most 

recently completed segment; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, or the original LTFV 

investigation, but the producer is, then 

the cash deposit rate will be the cash 

deposit rate established for the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the merchandise; and (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 5.40 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.22

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: July 30, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

VI. Discussion of the Methodology 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–16835 Filed 8–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–967] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Rescission of Review in Part; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

aluminum extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China (China). The period 

of review (POR) is May 1, 2019, through 

April 30, 2020. Commerce preliminarily 

determines that, because Kingtom 

Aluminio S.R.L. (Kingtom) exported 

merchandise from the Dominican 

Republic that is Chinese in origin, 

Kingtom is a third-country exporter and 

is not eligible for a separate rate and 

that, because Kingtom did not identify 

a Chinese exporter, we are unable to use 

the information provided by Kingtom to 

apply our non-market economy (NME) 

calculation methodology. Additionally, 

we preliminarily determine that none of 

the companies for which an 

administrative review was requested, 

and the request was not withdrawn, 

have demonstrated their eligibility for a 

separate rate and are, therefore, part of 

the China-wide entity, unless they have 

submitted a valid statement of no 

shipments. Interested parties are invited 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 43169 

1See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 

30650 (May 26, 2011) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

41540, 41544–41545 (July 10, 2020) (Initiation 

Notice). Several parties, including Kingtom itself, 

had used the name ‘‘Kingtom S.L.R.’’ instead of 

‘‘Kingtom S.R.L.’’ in their submissions, as did 

Commerce in the Initiation Notice. The Aluminum 

Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (the petitioner), 

clarified the name. See Petitioner’s Letter, 

‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic 

of China: Clarification of Mandatory Respondent,’’ 

dated April 30, 2021. Because ‘‘S.R.L.’’ stands for 

Sociedad de Responsibilidad Limitada and is the 

proper business form, we corrected the error in the 

Initiation Notice. See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

31282 (June 11, 2021). 

3See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Partial 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated September 4, 2020. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from 

the People’s Republic of China; 2019–2020,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

5See Initiation Notice, 85 FR at 41544–41545. 

6See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for 

further details. 

7See Initiation Notice, 85 FR at 41542. 

8 Id. 

9See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Comments on 

Kingtom’s Section A Questionnaire Response,’’ 

dated January 7, 2021, at Attachment 1, page 1. 

10 Id. at Attachment 1, pages 2 and 5. 

11 Id. at Attachment 1, page 18. 

12See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 13– 

16. 

to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable August 6, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Flessner, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6312. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 15, 2020, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

administrative review of the AD order 

on aluminum extrusions from China 1

for the period May 1, 2019, through 

April 30, 2020, covering 98 companies.2

All requests for administrative review 

were timely withdrawn with regard to 

11 companies (listed in Appendix II to 

this notice), leaving 87 companies 

subject to this administrative review.3

For a complete description of the events 

that followed the initiation of this 

administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4

The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s AD and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of 

topics included in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is included as 

Appendix I to this notice. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is aluminum extrusions which are 

shapes and forms, produced by an 

extrusion process, made from aluminum 

alloys having metallic elements 

corresponding to the alloy series 

designations published by The 

Aluminum Association commencing 

with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or 

proprietary equivalents or other 

certifying body equivalents). For a full 

description of the scope, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

preliminary results of review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party or parties that 

requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the 

publication date of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. As 

noted above, all requests for an 

administrative review were timely 

withdrawn for certain companies. 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 

administrative review with respect to 11 

of the 98 companies named in the 

Initiation Notice.5 See Appendix II for a 

list of these companies.6

Separate Rates 

In the Initiation Notice, we informed 

parties of the opportunity to request a 

separate rate.7 In proceedings involving 

NME countries, Commerce begins with 

a rebuttable presumption that all 

companies within the NME country are 

subject to government control, and thus 

should be assigned a single weightedaverage dumping margin. It is 

Commerce’s policy to assign all 

exporters of merchandise subject to an 

administrative review involving an 

NME country this single rate unless an 

exporter can demonstrate that it is 

sufficiently independent so as to be 

entitled to a separate rate. Companies 

that wanted to qualify for separate rate 

status in this administrative review 

were required to timely file, as 

appropriate, a separate rate application 

(SRA) or a separate rate certification 

(SRC) to demonstrate their eligibility for 

a separate rate. SRAs and SRCs were 

due to Commerce within 30 calendar 

days of the publication of the Initiation 

Notice.8

Of the companies for which an 

administrative review was requested, 

and not withdrawn, only Kingtom 

submitted an SRA or SRC. Additionally, 

Anderson International, Kingtom, and 

Sunvast Trade Shanghai submitted 

certifications of no shipments. On 

November 2, 2020, U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) issued a Notice 

of Determination as to Evasion, in 

which CBP concluded that ‘‘substantial 

evidence’’ demonstrated that the 

aluminum extrusions imported from 

‘‘the claimed manufacturer, Kingtom 

Aluminio SRL (Kingtom)’’ were of 

Chinese-origin and ‘‘were transshipped’’ 

with the ‘‘country of origin claimed as 

the Dominican Republic.’’ 9 CBP 

‘‘further’’ determined that ‘‘substantial 

evidence indicates that the Importers 

imports were entered through evasion, 

resulting in the avoidance of applicable 

AD/CVD deposits or other security.’’ 10

Accordingly, CBP determined that it 

would ‘‘rate adjust and change’’ type 01 

entries of the merchandise at issue to 

‘‘type 03 and continue suspension until 

instructed to liquidate these entries.’’ 11

Kingtom was therefore a third-country 

exporter of Chinese-origin merchandise 

from the Dominican Republic during the 

POR, and as a third-country exporter, 

Kingtom was not eligible for a separate 

rate. Furthermore, Kingtom reported no 

exporter of the subject merchandise 

from China on the record; therefore, 

Commerce was unable to apply its 

separate rate analysis to any exporter of 

the merchandise re-exported by 

Kingtom to the United States in this 

review. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

preliminary denial of a separate rate to 

Kingtom and our rejection of its no 

shipments claim, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. We therefore 

preliminarily determine that the 85 

companies listed in Appendix III to this 

notice are not eligible for a separate rate 

in this administrative review.12


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
43170 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 

13See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). 

14See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 85 FR 

19726, 19728 (April 8, 2020). 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

16See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary 

Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due 

to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule). 

17See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

18See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

19See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

20See Temporary Rule. 

21See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

22See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

23See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 

China-Wide Entity 

We preliminarily find that the 85 

companies subject to this review and 

identified in Appendix III to this notice 

are part of the China-wide entity in this 

administrative review because they 

failed to submit an SRA, SRC, or 

certification of no shipments. 

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.13 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity in the 

instant review, and because Commerce 

did not self-initiate such a review, the 

entity is not under review, and the 

entity’s current rate (i.e., 86.01 

percent) 14 is not subject to change. 

Adjustments for Countervailable 

Subsidies 

Because no company established 

eligibility for an adjustment under 

section 777A(f) of the Act for 

countervailable domestic subsidies, for 

these preliminary results, Commerce 

did not make an adjustment pursuant to 

section 777A(f) of the Act for 

countervailable domestic subsidies for 

any companies under review. 

Furthermore, because the China-wide 

entity is not under review, we made no 

adjustment for countervailable export 

subsidies for the China-wide entity 

pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the 

Act. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Normally, Commerce discloses to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with the 

preliminary results within five days of 

the public announcement, or if there is 

no public announcement, within five 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). However, because 

Commerce did not calculate weightedaverage dumping margins for any 

companies in this review, nor for the 

China-wide entity, there is nothing 

further to disclose. This satisfies our 

regulatory obligation. 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.15

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed no later 

than seven days after the case briefs are 

filed.16 Parties who submit case or 

rebuttal briefs in this review are 

requested to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue, 

(2) a brief summary of the argument, 

and (3) a table of authorities.17

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.18 Hearing requests should 

contain the following information: (1) 

The party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of the issues 

to be discussed. Oral presentations at 

the hearing will be limited to issues 

raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the time and date for 

the hearing to be held.19

An electronically-filed document 

must be received successfully in its 

entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the established 

deadline. Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information.20

Unless otherwise extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

which will include the results of our 

analysis of all issues raised in any briefs 

received, within 120 days of publication 

of these preliminary results in the 

Federal Register, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results, 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.21 If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) 

in the final results of this review, we 

intend to calculate importer-specific 

assessment rates on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of the 

importer’s sales in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis in the final results, 

or if an importer-specific assessment 

rate is zero or de minimis, then we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regards to antidumping 

duties. 

Consistent with its recent notice,22

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). The final results of this 

administrative review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise under 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate 

entries containing subject merchandise 

exported by the China-wide entity at the 

China-wide rate. Additionally, if 

Commerce determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number will be 

liquidated at the China-wide rate.23

For the companies for which this 

review is rescinded, antidumping duties 

shall be assessed at rates equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

for those companies 35 days after 

publication of this notice. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements for estimated antidumping 

duties, when imposed, will apply to all 

shipments of subject merchandise from 

China entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) If 

the companies preliminarily determined 

to be eligible for a separate rate receive 

a separate rate in the final results of this 

administrative review, their cash 

deposit rate will be equal to the 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 43171 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review, as adjusted for domestic and 

export subsidies (except that if that rate 

is de minimis, then the cash deposit rate 

will be zero); (2) for any previously 

investigated or reviewed Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters that are not 

under review in this segment of the 

proceeding but that received a separate 

rate in the most recently completed 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) for all Chinese exporters 

of subject merchandise that have not 

been found to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be that 

of the China-wide entity; (4) for the 

China-wide entity, the cash deposit rate 

will be 86.01 percent; and (5) for all 

non-Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter that supplied that non-Chinese 

exporter (or, if unidentified, that of the 

China-wide entity). 

These cash deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing notice 

of these preliminary results in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 30, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Respondent Selection 

V. Statements of No Shipments 

VI. Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

VII. Non-Market Economy Country 

VIII. Separate Rates 

IX. The China-Wide Entity 

X. Adjustments for Countervailable Subsidies 

XI. Cash Deposit Rate Applicable to Kingtom 

XII. Assessment Rate Applicable to Kingtom 

XIII. Section 232 Duties 

XIV. Kingtom Scope Inquiry 

XV. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies for Which This Administrative 

Review Is Being Rescinded 

1. Asia-Pacific Light Alloy (Nantong) 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

2. Jiangsu Asia-Pacific Light Alloy 

Technology Co Ltd. 

3. Modular Assembly Technology 

4. Ningbo Xiangshan Import & Export 

Corporation 

5. Rollease Acmeda Pty 

6. Suzhou Mingde Aluminum 

7. Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. 

8. Taizhou Puan Lighting Technology 

9. Uniton Investment Ltd. 

10. Wellste Material 

11. Zhejiang Shiner Import and Export 

Appendix III 

Companies Preliminarily Not Entitled to a 

Separate Rate 

1. Allpower Display Co., Ltd 

2. Amidi Zhuhai 

3. Beauty Sky Technology Co. Ltd 

4. Changshu Changsheng Aluminum 

Products Co., Ltd 

5. Chenming Industry and Commerce 

Shouguang Co., Ltd. 

6. China International Freight Co. Ltd 

7. China State Decoration Group Co., Ltd. 

8. CRRC Changzhou Auto Parts Co. Ltd* 

9. Custom Accessories Asia Ltd. 

10. Everfoison Industry Ltd. 

11. Foshan City Fangyuan Ceramic 

12. Foshan City Nanhai Yongfeng Aluminum 

13. Foshan City Top Deal Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

14. Foshan Gold Bridge Import and Export 

Co. Ltd. 

15. Foshan Golden Promise Import and 

Export Co., Ltd. 

16. Foshan Guangshou Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

17. Foshan Xingtao Aluminum Profile Co., 

Ltd. 

18. Fujian Minfa Aluminum Inc. 

19. Fujian Minfa Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

20. Fuzhou Ruifuchang Trading Co., Ltd. 

21. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

22. Gebruder Weiss 

23. Gold Bridge International 

24. Grupo Emb 

25. Grupo Europeo La Optica 

26. Grupo Pe No Mato In 

27. Guangdong Gaoming Guangtai Shicai 

28. Guangdong Gaoxin Communication 

Equipment Industrial Co., Ltd. 

29. Guangdong Golden China Economy 

30. Guangdong Maoming Foreign Trade 

Enterprise Development Co. 

31. Guangdong Taiming Metal Products Co., 

LTD. 

32. Guangdong Victor Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

33. Guangzhou Jintao Trade Company 

34. Hangzhou Evernew Machinery & 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

35. Hangzhou Tonny Electric and Tools Co., 

Ltd. 

36. Hefei Sylux Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 

37. Hong Kong Dayo Company, Ltd. 

38. Huazhijie Plastic Products 

39. Huiqiao International Shanghai 

40. Ilshim Almax 

41. Jer Education Technology 

42. Jiangsu Weatherford Hongda Petroleum 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

43. Jiangsu Yizheng Haitian Aluminum 

Industrial 

44. Jiang Yin Ming Ding Aluminum & Plastic 

Products Co., Ltd 

45. Jilin Qixing Aluminum Industries Co., 

Ltd. 

46. Jin Lingfeng Plastic Electrical Appliance 

47. Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co. 

Ltd. 

48. Kingtom Aluminio SRL 

49. Larkcop International Co Ltd 

50. Ledluz Co Ltd 

51. Liansu Group Co. Ltd 

52. Links Relocations Beijing 

53. Marshell International 

54. Ningbo Deye Inverter Technology 

55. Ningbo Hightech Development 

56. Ningbo Winjoy International Trading 

57. Orient Express Container 

58. Ou Chuang Plastic Building Material 

(Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. 

59. Pentagon Freight Service 

60. Pro Fixture Hong Kong 

61. Qingdao Sea Nova Building 

62. Qingdao Yahe Imports and Exports 

63. Sewon 

64. Shandong Huajian Aluminum Industry 

65. Shanghai EverSkill M&E Co., Ltd. 

66. Shanghai Jingxin Logistics 

67. Shanghai Ouma Crafts Co, Ltd. 

68. Shanghai Phidix Trading 

69. Sinogar Aluminum 

70. Transwell Logistics Co., Ltd. 

71. United Aluminum 

72. Wanhui Industrial China 

73. Wenzhou Yongtai Electric Co., Ltd. 

74. Winstar Power Technology Limited 

75. Wisechain Trading Ltd. 

76. Wuxi Lotus Essence 

77. Wuxi Rapid Scaffolding Engineering 

78. Wuxi Zontai Int’l Corporation Ltd. 

79. Xuancheng Huilv Aluminum Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

80. Yekalon Industry Inc 

81. Yonn Yuu Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

82. Yuyao Royal Industrial 

83. Zhejiang Guoyao Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

84. Zhongshan Broad Windows and Doors 

and Curtain 

85. ZL Trade Shanghai 

[FR Doc. 2021–16843 Filed 8–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES