Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Notices 41015 

1See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the 

Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019, 86 FR 6868 (January 25, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Maverick Tube Corporation, Tenaris Bay 

City, Inc., and IPSCO Tubulars Inc. (collectively, 

Maverick)’s Letter, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from the Republic of Korea: Case Brief of Maverick 

Tube Corporation, Tenaris Bay City, Inc., and 

IPSCO Tubulars Inc.,’’ dated February 25, 2021; 

United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel)’s Letter, 

‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of 

Korea: Case Brief of United States Steel 

Corporation,’’ dated February 26, 2021; Hyundai 

Steel Company (Hyundai Steel)’s Letter, ‘‘Certain 

Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of 

Korea—Case Brief,’’ dated February 25, 2021; SeAH 

Steel Corporation (SeAH)’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Order on Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from Korea—Case Brief of SeAH 

Steel Corporation,’’ dated February 25, 2021; 

Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel)’s Letter, ‘‘Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea, Case 

No. A–580–870: Husteel’s Case Brief,’’ dated 

February 25, 2021; AJU Besteel’s Letter, ‘‘Certain 

Continued 

unfinished, whether assembled or 

unassembled, and whether the equipment 

contains any additional features that provide 

for functions beyond the primary lifting 

function. 

Subject merchandise includes, but is not 

limited to, the following subassemblies: 

• Scissor arm assemblies, or scissor arm 

sections, for connection to chassis and 

platform assemblies. These assemblies 

include: (1) Pin assemblies that connect 

sections to form scissor arm assemblies, and 

(2) actuators that power the arm assemblies 

to extend and retract. These assemblies may 

or may not also include blocks that allow 

sliding of end sections in relation to frame 

and platform, hydraulic hoses, electrical 

cables, and/or other components; 

• boom assemblies, or boom sections, for 

connection to the boom turntable, or to the 

chassis assembly, or to a platform assembly 

or to a lifting device. Boom assemblies 

include telescoping sections where the 

smallest section (or tube) can be nested in the 

next larger section (or tube) and can slide out 

for extension and/or articulated sections 

joined by pins. These assemblies may or may 

not include pins, hydraulic cylinders, 

hydraulic hoses, electrical cables, and/or 

other components; 

• chassis assemblies, for connection to 

scissor arm assemblies, or to boom 

assemblies, or to boom turntable assemblies. 

Chassis assemblies include: (1) Chassis 

frames, and (2) frame sections. Chassis 

assemblies may or may not include axles, 

wheel end components, steering cylinders, 

engine assembly, transmission, drive shafts, 

tires and wheels, crawler tracks and wheels, 

fuel tank, hydraulic oil tanks, battery 

assemblies, and/or other components; 

• boom turntable assemblies, for 

connection to chassis assemblies, or to boom 

assemblies. Boom turntable assemblies 

include turntable frames. Boom turntable 

assemblies may or may not include engine 

assembly, slewing rings, fuel tank, hydraulic 

oil tank, battery assemblies, counterweights, 

hoods (enclosures), and/or other 

components. 

Importation of any of these subassemblies, 

whether assembled or unassembled, 

constitutes unfinished mobile access 

equipment for purposes of this investigation. 

Processing of finished and unfinished 

mobile access equipment and subassemblies 

such as trimming, cutting, grinding, 

notching, punching, slitting, drilling, 

welding, joining, bolting, bending, beveling, 

riveting, minor fabrication, galvanizing, 

painting, coating, finishing, assembly, or any 

other processing either in the country of 

manufacture of the in-scope product or in a 

third country does not remove the product 

from the scope. Inclusion of other 

components not identified as comprising the 

finished or unfinished mobile access 

equipment does not remove the product from 

the scope. 

The scope excludes forklifts, vertical mast 

lifts, mobile self-propelled cranes and motor 

vehicles that incorporate a scissor arm 

assembly or boom assembly. Forklifts are 

material handling vehicles with a working 

attachment, usually a fork, lifted along a 

vertical guide rail with the operator seated or 

standing on the chassis behind the vertical 

mast. Vertical mast lifts are person and 

material lifting vehicles with a working 

attachment, usually a platform, lifted along a 

vertical guide rail with an operator standing 

on the platform. Mobile self-propelled cranes 

are material handling vehicles with a boom 

attachment for lifting loads of tools or 

materials that are suspended on ropes, 

cables, and/or chains, and which contain 

winches mounted on or near the base of the 

boom with ropes, cables, and/or chains 

managed along the boom structure. The 

scope also excludes motor vehicles (defined 

as a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical 

power and manufactured primarily for use on 

public streets, roads, and highways, but does 

not include a vehicle operated only on a rail 

line pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30102(a)(7)) that 

incorporate a scissor arm assembly or boom 

assembly. The scope further excludes 

vehicles driven or drawn by mechanical 

power operated only on a rail line that 

incorporate a scissor arm assembly or boom 

assembly. The scope also excludes: (1) Rail 

line vehicles, defined as vehicles with hi-rail 

gear or track wheels, and a fixed (nontelescopic) main boom, which perform 

operations on rail lines, such as laying rails, 

setting ties, or other rail maintenance jobs; 

and (2) certain rail line vehicle 

subassemblies, defined as chassis 

subassemblies and boom turntable 

subassemblies for rail line vehicles with a 

fixed (non-telescopic) main boom. 

Certain mobile access equipment subject to 

this investigation is typically classifiable 

under subheadings 8427.10.8020, 

8427.10.8030, 8427.10.8070, 8427.10.8095, 

8427.20.8020, 8427.20.8090, 8427.90.0020 

and 8427.90.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Parts 

of certain mobile access equipment are 

typically classifiable under subheading 

8431.20.0000 of the HTSUS. While the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes only, the 

written description of the merchandise under 

investigation is dispositive. 

Appendix II 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Period of Investigation 

IV. Injury Test 

V. Scope Comments 

VI. Scope of the Investigation 

VII. Diversification of China’s Economy 

VIII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Application of Adverse Inferences 

IX. Subsidies Valuation 

X. Interest Rate Benchmarks, Discount Rates, 

Input, Electricity, and Land Benchmarks 

XI. Analysis of Programs 

XII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–16332 Filed 7–29–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–870] 

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

From the Republic of Korea: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that certain oil 

country tubular goods (OCTG) from the 

Republic of Korea (Korea) are being sold 

in the United States at prices below 

normal value. The period of review 

(POR) is September 1, 2018, through 

August 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable July 30, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Davina Friedmann, Mark Flessner, or 

Frank Schmitt, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0698, 

(202) 482–6312, or (202) 482–4880, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 25, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. Between February 

25 and March 4, 2021, Commerce 

received timely filed case briefs and 

rebuttal briefs from various interested 

parties.2 On April 28, 2021, we 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
41016 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Notices 

Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of 

Korea—Letter in Support of Case Briefs,’’ dated 

February 25, 2021; ILJIN’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of 

Korea—Letter in Support of Case Briefs,’’ dated 

February 25, 2021; Maverick’s Letter, ‘‘Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: Rebuttal 

Brief of Maverick Tube Corporation, Tenaris Bay 

City, Inc. and IPSCO Tubular Inc.,’’ dated March 4, 

2021; U.S. Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular 

Goods from the Republic of Korea: Rebuttal Brief of 

United States Steel Corporation,’’ dated March 5, 

2021; Hyundai Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea— 

Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated March 4, 2021; SeAH’s Letter, 

‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Korea— 

Rebuttal Brief of SeAH Steel Corporation,’’ dated 

March 5, 2021; and Husteel’s Letter, ‘‘Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from Republic of Korea, Case No. A– 

580–870: Letter in Support of Respondents’ 

Rebuttal Briefs,’’ dated March 4, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Time 

Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 2018–2019,’’ dated April 

28, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018– 

2019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

5See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

61011 (November 12, 2021). The 53 companies 

consist of two mandatory respondents and 51 

companies not individually examined. 

6See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic 

of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 53691 (September 10, 

2014) (Order). 

7See Appendix II for a full list of these 

companies. 

8See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

9 Id. 

extended the deadline for the final 

results until July 23, 2021.3

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the Preliminary 

Results of this administrative review, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

These final results cover 53 

companies.5 Based on an analysis of the 

comments received, we have made 

changes to the weighted-average 

dumping margins determined for the 

respondents. The weighted-average 

dumping margins are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section, 

below. Commerce conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 6

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is certain OCTG, which are 

hollow steel products of circular crosssection, including oil well casing and 

tubing, of iron (other than cast iron) or 

steel (both carbon and alloy), whether 

seamless or welded, regardless of end 

finish (e.g., whether or not plain end, 

threaded, or threaded and coupled) 

whether or not conforming to American 

Petroleum Institute (API) or non-API 

specifications, whether finished 

(including limited service OCTG 

products) or unfinished (including 

green tubes and limited service OCTG 

products), whether or not thread 

protectors are attached. The scope of the 

Order also covers OCTG coupling stock. 

For a complete description of the scope 

of the Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this 

review are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. The issues are 

identified in Appendix I to this notice. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made certain 

changes to the margin calculations for 

SeAH and Hyundai Steel. For a 

discussion of these changes, see the 

‘‘Margin Calculations’’ section of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual review in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weighted 

average of the estimated weighted 

average dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

For these final results, we calculated 

a weighted-average dumping margin 

that is not zero, de minimis, or 

determined entirely on the basis of facts 

available for SeAH. Accordingly, 

Commerce has assigned to the 

companies not individually examined 

(see Appendix II for a full list of these 

companies) a margin of 0.77 percent, 

which is SeAH’s calculated weightedaverage dumping margin for these final 

results. 

Final Results of Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period September 

1, 2018, through August 31, 2019: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margins 

(percent) 

Hyundai Steel Company ............. 0.00 

SeAH Steel Corporation ............. 0.77 

Non-examined companies 7 ........ 0.77 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results of review within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

shall determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. 

Where the respondent reported 

reliable entered values, we calculated 

importer- (or customer-) specific ad 

valorem rates by aggregating the 

dumping margins calculated for all U.S. 

sales to each importer (or customer) and 

dividing this amount by the total 

entered value of the sales to each 

importer (or customer).8 Where 

Commerce calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin by dividing the 

total amount of dumping for reviewed 

sales to that party by the total sales 

quantity associated with those 

transactions, Commerce will direct CBP 

to assess importer- (or customer-) 

specific assessment rates based on the 

resulting per-unit rates.9 Where an 

importer- (or customer-) specific ad 

valorem or per-unit rate is greater than 

de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Notices 41017 

10 Id. 

11See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

12For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

13See Notice of Discontinuation Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

14See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not 

in Harmony with Final Determination, 81 FR 59603 

(August 30, 2016). 

Commerce will instruct CBP to collect 

the appropriate duties at the time of 

liquidation.10 Where an importer- (or 

customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.11

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

methodology described in the ‘‘Rates for 

Non-Examined Companies’’ section, 

above. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by SeAH, Hyundai Steel, or 

the non-examined companies for which 

the producer did not know that its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.12

Consistent with its recent notice,13

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rates for the 

companies listed in these final results 

will be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margins established in the 

final results of this review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment in which the 

company was reviewed; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 5.24 percent,14 the 

all-others rate established in the LTFV 

investigation. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This administrative review and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213. 

Dated: July 23, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

General Issues 

Comment 1–A: Lawfulness of Commerce’s 

Interpretation of the Particular Market 

Situation (PMS) Provision 

Comment 1–B: Evidence of a PMS 

Comment 1–C: Quantification of PMS 

Adjustment 

Comment 2: Differential Pricing 

Comment 3: Calculation of Constructed 

Value (CV) Profit and Selling Expenses 

Hyundai Steel-Specific Issues 

Comment 4: Arm’s Length Adjustment for 

Services from Affiliate 

Comment 5: Transportation of OCTG from 

Affiliate 

Comment 6: Cost of Prime Products Sold 

in the United States 

Comment 7: Transfer Price as an Indirect 

Selling Expense 

Comment 8: Correcting Drafting Errors 

Comment 9: Hyundai Steel’s Entered Value 

Comment 10: U.S. Warehousing Expense 

Comment 11: Reallocating an Input as a 

Packing Expense 

SeAH-Specific Issues 

Comment 12: PMS Adjustment in the 

Sales-Below-Cost Test 

Comment 13: Freight Revenue Cap 

Comment 14: Calculation of General and 

Administrative (G&A) Expenses Incurred 

by SeAH’s U.S. Affiliate 

Comment 15: Correction of a Ministerial 

Error in SeAH’s Preliminary Margin 

Program 

Comment 16: SeAH’s Kuwait Sales to 

Calculate Normal Value 

Comment 17: CEP Offset 

VII. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies Not 

Individually Examined 

1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. 

2. Blue Sea Precision Tube Co., Ltd. 

3. Bo Myung Metal Co., Ltd. 

4. BUMA CE Co., Ltd. 

5. Busung Steel Co., Ltd. 

6. Chang Won Bending Co., Ltd. 

7. Daeho P&C Co., Ltd. 

8. Daou Precision Ind. Co. 

9. Dongyang Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. 

10. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. 

11. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 

12. EEW Korea Co., Ltd. 

13. Global Solutions Co., Ltd. 

14. Hansol Metal Co., Ltd. 

15. HiSteel Co., Ltd. 

16. HPP Co., Ltd. 

17. Husteel Co., Ltd. 

18. Hyundai Group 

19. Hyundai Corporation 

20. Hyundai HYSCO 

21. Hyundai RB Co., Ltd. 

22. ILJIN Steel Corporation 

23. Keonwoo Metals Co., Ltd. 

24. K Steel Corporation 

25. KF UBIS Co., Ltd. 

26. Korea Steel Co., Ltd. 

27. Kukje Steel Co., Ltd. 

28. KPF Co., Ltd. 

29. Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
41018 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

41540 (July 10, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ 

dated July 21, 2020. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of the Deadline 

for Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

March 9, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated FlatRolled Steel Products from Japan,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

5For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

6See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 

8See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

9See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

10See 19 CFR 351.303. 

11See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

12See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

30. Kumsoo Connecting Co., Ltd. 

31. Master Steel Corporation 

32. MCK Co., Ltd. 

33. MS Pipe Co., Ltd. 

34. Msteel Co., Ltd. 

35. Nexen Corporation 

36. NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. 

37. Pneumatic Plus Korea Co., Ltd. 

38. POSCO International Corporation 

39. PSG Co., Ltd. 

40. Pusan Fitting Corporation 

41. SeAH FS Co., Ltd. 

42. Sejong Ind. Co., Ltd. 

43. Seokyoung Steel & Technology Co., Ltd. 

44. SIC Tube Co., Ltd. 

45. ST Tubular Inc. 

46. Sungkwang Bend Co., Ltd. 

47. TGS Pipe Co., Ltd. 

48. TJ Glovsteel Co., Ltd. 

49. TSP Corporation 

50. Union Pipe MFG Co., Ltd. 

51. WSG Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2021–16250 Filed 7–29–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–869] 

Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated FlatRolled Steel Products From Japan: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated 

flat-rolled steel products (nickel-plated 

steel products) from Japan are being, or 

are likely to be, sold in the United States 

at less than normal value (NV) during 

the period of review (POR) May 1, 2019, 

through April 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable July 30, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amaris Wade, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; (202) 482–3874, email: 

amaris.wade@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 10, 2020, based on timely 

requests for review, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an 

administrative review on nickel-plated 

steel products from Japan.1 This review 

covers one producer/exporter of the 

subject merchandise, Toyo Kohan Co., 

Ltd. (Toyo Kohan). 

On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all 

deadlines in administrative reviews by 

60 days.2 In March 2021, Commerce 

extended the preliminary results of this 

review to no later than July 30, 2021.3

For a complete description of the events 

that followed the initiation of this 

review, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.4

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flatrolled steel products from Japan. The 

product is currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings 

7212.50.0000 and 7210.90.6000. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written product 

description remains dispositive.5

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) 

and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Export price is 

calculated in accordance with section 

772 of the Act. NV is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. A list of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as an Appendix to this notice. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margin exists for the period May 1, 

2019, through April 30, 2020: 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd ............ 7.21% 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice.6

Interested parties may submit case briefs 

to Commerce no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice.7

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed no later 

than seven days after the deadline for 

filing case briefs.8 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of authorities.9

Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed 

using ACCESS.10

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, filed electronically via 

ACCESS within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.11 Hearing 

requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Oral 

presentations at the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the time and date for 

the hearing.12

An electronically-filed document 

must be received successfully in its 

entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the established 

deadline. 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1