alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Neil M. Leibman, certifythat:

                1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, of GexaCorp.;

                2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

                3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

                4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                                (a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

                                (b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

                                (c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyeffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

                5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                                a)             Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

                                b)            Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| /s/ Neil M. Leibman     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Neil M. Leibman         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Dated: April 29, 2005   |   |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1000 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1000

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 1997

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse at 500 State Avenue in Kansas 
   City, Kansas, as the ``Robert J. Dole United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT J. DOLE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse at 500 State Avenue in Kansas City, 
Kansas, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert J. Dole United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert J. Dole 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate July 25, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Case: 1:02-cr-00635 Document #: 176 Filed: 11/18/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:776
Exhibit 10.2 - Executive Officer Compensation

     The Board of the Bank, upon the recommendation of the Executive Officer
Compensation Committee and at the request of Mr. Wacknitz, approved a reduction
in the annual base salary of Stephen H. Wacknitz, CEO/President, from $560,000
to $420,000 effective December 1, 2008.
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 2 of 15 PageID #:2
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 3 of 15 PageID #:3
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 4 of 15 PageID #:4
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 5 of 15 PageID #:5
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 6 of 15 PageID #:6
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 7 of 15 PageID #:7
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 8 of 15 PageID #:8
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 9 of 15 PageID #:9
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 10 of 15 PageID #:10
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 11 of 15 PageID #:11
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 12 of 15 PageID #:12
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 13 of 15 PageID #:13
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 14 of 15 PageID #:14
Case: 1:00-cv-08195 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/29/00 Page 15 of 15 PageID #:15
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2004 (the "Report"), I, John E.
Gherty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 26, 2004

                                                   By  /s/ John E. Gherty
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   John E. Gherty
                                                   President
                                                   and Chief Executive Officer
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 38 Filed: 02/11/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:194
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 38 Filed: 02/11/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:195
Case: 1:02-cv-02706 Document #: 38 Filed: 02/11/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:196
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Robert L. Miller, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of CVF Technologies Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fiscalfourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2007       /s/ Robert L. Miller Robert L. Miller,
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0142. STEPHEN MICHAEL WEIHROUCH v. THE STATE.

In October 2012, Stephen Michael Weihrouch pled guilty to several offenses,

including theft by bringing stolen property into the State. Weihrouch subsequently

filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which the trial court denied on the basis

that it was filed after the term of court in which sentence was entered. Weihrouch

filed this application for discretionary appeal.

The denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea may be appealed directly. See

Smith v. State, 283 Ga. 376 (659 SE2d 380) (2008). Ordinarily, if a party applies for

discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the application under

OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the application must be

filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d) &

(j); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420 SE2d 393) (1992).

Although Weihrouch included a copy of the trial court’s order with his

application, it was not a stamped “filed” copy as required by Court of Appeals Rule

31 (e). Without the stamped “filed” copy of the order, we cannot ascertain if the

application was filed within 30 days, which is a jurisdictional requirement. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

Accordingly, on November 13, 2014, we ordered Weihrouch to supplement his

application within ten days with a stamped “filed” copy of the order to be appealed.

We provided that failure to comply with this directive would result in dismissal of the

December 04, 2014
application. Weihrouch has not submitted a stamped “filed” copy of the order, and

more than ten days have passed since the November 13, 2014 order. Accordingly,

Weihrouch’s application for discretionary appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

2

12/04/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of First Commonwealth, Inc. as of December 31,
1995, and for the twelve months then ended, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         12,680
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                      197
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,889
<PP&E>                                          2,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,280
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            3
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,111
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               33,315
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  29,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  193
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,336
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.67



</TABLE>
The H onorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3621

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Roland Rogers, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 3, 1998 Filed: February 12, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Roland Rogers pleaded guilty to possessing crack cocaine with intent to dis tribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A), and to possessin g cocainewith intent to distribute, in violation of section 841(a)(1). Although Roger s objected to the use of the Guidelines for crack cocaine, rather than for cocaine, arguing th e heightened crack cocaine penalties violated his Fifth Amendment right to equal protection, the district court denied the objection and sentenced Rogers to two 1-2-

conc urrent

terms of 121 months imprisonment, and five years supervised release
. Rog ers now appeals, and we affirm, because Rogers & s challenge is foreclosed by our prior decisio ns upholding the constitutionality of the 100-to-1 ratio. See, e.g. , United States v. Carter , 91 F.3d 1196, 1197-99 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); United States v. Jackson , 67 F.3d 1359, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 1684 (1996). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EAGLE USA AIRFREIGHT, INC. FOR THE
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          25,107
<SECURITIES>                                     2,679
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                       566
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,005
<PP&E>                                          18,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,367
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,871
<SALES>                                        291,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,767
<CGS>                                          163,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               102,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 153 (Thursday, August 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 44406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-881]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Cambrex High 
Point, Inc.

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Cambrex High Point, Inc., has applied to be registered as an 
importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before September 13, 
2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before September 13, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
requests for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this 
is notice that on July 9, 2021, Cambrex High Point, Inc., 4180 
Mendenhall Oaks Parkway, High Point, North Carolina 27265-8017, applied 
to renew as an importer of the following basic class(es) of controlled 
substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Poppy Straw Concentrate................     9670  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import Poppy Straw Concentrate to develop its 
own portfolio of generic products. Approval of permit applications will 
occur only when the registrant's business activity is consistent with 
what is authorized under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2).

Brian S. Besser,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-17185 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P