alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1290

For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 9, 1997

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Saeed Rezai shall be held and considered

7 to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for

8 permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of

9 this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

11 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Saeed

12 Rezai as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall
2

S 1290 IS

1 instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number during

2 the current fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas

3 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth

4 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

Æ
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Lawrence S. Barker, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report of Visual Networks, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2005                                    
|                                                        
|/s/ Lawrence S. Barker                                  
|Lawrence S. Barker President and Chief Executive Officer



49
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 21
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

SunQuest SPC, Inc., an Arizona corporation 
BritWill Healthcare Company, a Delaware corporation 
Quest Pharmacies, Inc., an Arizona corporation 
Sunbelt Therapy Management Services, Inc., an Arizona corporation 
Safford Care, Inc., a Colorado corporation 
RehabWest, Inc., a Colorado corporation 
Cornerstone Care, Inc., a Colorado corporation 
Signature HealthCare Corporation, a Delaware corporation 
Arkansas, Inc., a Colorado corporation 
Douglas Manor, Inc., a Colorado corporation 
Memphis Clinical Laboratory, Inc., a Tennessee corporation
American Professional Holding, Inc., a Utah corporation 
BritWill Investments-II, Inc., a Delaware corporation 
BritWill Investments-I, Inc., a Delaware corporation 
BritWill Funding Corporation, a Delaware corporation 
Decatur Sports Fit & Wellness Center, Inc., an Alabama corporation 
Therapy Health Systems, Inc., a Mississippi corporation
Henderson & Associates Rehabilitation, Inc., an Alabama corporation 
Sunbelt Therapy Management Services, Inc., an Alabama corporation 
Brookshire House Inc., (fka Asbury Circle, Inc.) a Colorado corporation 
Christopher Nursing Center, Inc., a Colorado corporation 
Amberwood Court, Inc., (fka Valley Hi, Inc.) a Colorado corporation 
The Arbors Health Care Center, Inc., an Arizona corporation 
Los Arcos, Inc., a Colorado corporation 
Pueblo Norte, Inc., (fka Signature Health Care of California Corporation),
         a Colorado corporation
Rio Verde Nursing Center, Inc., a Colorado corporation 
Signature Management Group, Inc., a Colorado corporation 
Ampro Medical Services, Inc., a Texas corporation 
Gamma Laboratories, Inc., a Missouri corporation 
Emory Care Center, Inc., a Texas corporation 
Cedar Care, Inc., an Indiana corporation 
Sherwood HealthCare Corp., an Indiana corporation 
BritWill Indiana Partnership, an Arizona general partnership
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.15


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eurotech Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randolph A. Graves,
Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Randolph A. Graves, Jr.
----------------------------


Randolph A. Graves, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2002
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cattle Fever Tick Research Unit: Kerrville, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Kerrville, Texas Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory Cattle Fever Tick Research Unit People & Locations







James Kinney Hellums
                        Cattle Fever Tick Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Animal Caretaker
                        Phone: (956) 205-7650
                        
                        
                        Fax: (956) 205-7638(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 99.2

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

     The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe
harbor" for certain forward-looking statements. Certain information which may be
filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (as well as information
included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by
us) contains statements that are forward-looking, such as statements relating to
plans for future expansion and other business development activities as well as
other capital spending, financing sources and the effects of regulation
(including gaming and tax regulation) and competition. Such forward-looking
information involves important risks and uncertainties that could significantly
affect anticipated results in the future and, accordingly, such results may
differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on
behalf of us. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to,
those relating to development and construction activities, dependence on
existing management, leverage and debt service (including sensitivity to
fluctuations in interest rates), domestic or global economic conditions, whether
the Hilton Transaction (as defined in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1996) is successful, changes in Federal or state tax
laws or the administration of such laws and changes in gaming laws or
regulations (including the legalization of gaming in certain jurisdictions).
#### Frank Catalanotto et al., Respondents, v Tom Abraham et al., Defendants, and Kenneth Kirschenbaum, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 600]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Kenneth Kirschenbaum appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mayer, J.), dated January 13, 2011, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior determination in an order of the same court dated March 29, 2010, denying that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

In an order dated March 29, 2010, the Supreme Court, in pertinent part, denied that branch of the motion of the defendant Kenneth Kirschenbaum which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Kirschenbaum appealed from that order, but by decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 1, 2010, the appeal was dismissed for failure to prosecute. That dismissal constituted an adjudication on the merits with respect to all issues which could have been reviewed on that appeal *(see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Posner,*89 AD3d 674, 675 [2011]; *Auriemmo v Auriemmo,*87 AD3d 1090, 1091 [2011]).

Kirschenbaum moved, inter alia, for leave to reargue that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismiss*938ing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court granted leave to reargue but, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination denying that branch of the motion. Kirschenbaum now appeals from so much of that order as, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination.

Generally, we do not consider an issue on a subsequent appeal which was raised or could have been raised in an earlier appeal which was dismissed for lack of prosecution, although we have inherent jurisdiction to do so *(see Rúbeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.,*93 NY2d 750 [1999]; *Bray v Cox,*38 NY2d 350 [1976]; *Madison v Tahir,*45 AD3d 744, 744-745 [2007]). Here, Kirschenbaum has not demonstrated any basis for the exercise of such discretion. Balkin, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.
# C_2020191EN.01001702.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/17

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin kaupunki v Commission

(Case T-597/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2020/C 191/23)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Helsingin kaupunki (Finland) (represented by: I. Aalto-Setälä, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Huttunen and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 3152 final of 28 June 2019 relating to State aid SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by Finland for Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The order of 19 September 2019, Helsingin kaupunki v Commission (T-597/19 R, not published) is set aside. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The order of 19 September 2019, Helsingin kaupunki v Commission (T-597/19 R, not published) is set aside.

| 3. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Nobina Oy and of Nobina AB or the application for confidentiality made by Helsingin kaupunki. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Nobina Oy and of Nobina AB or the application for confidentiality made by Helsingin kaupunki.

| 4. | The costs are reserved, except for those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB, which shall bear their own costs relating to their application for leave to intervene in the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The costs are reserved, except for those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB, which shall bear their own costs relating to their application for leave to intervene in the proceedings for interim measures.

---
#### Atlanta & Carolina Railway *v.*Hollingsworth, admr., *et al.*

March 9, 1915.

Receivership. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. June 16, 1914.

*Simmons & Simmons,*for plaintiff in error.

*Burton Smith, Robert C. & Philip H. Alston, Daley & Chambers, W. A. Fuller,*and *L. S. Hulbert,*contra.

Beck, J.

1. Under the peculiar facts of this case, the court did not err in appointing a receiver.

2. Had the evidence which was rejected been admitted, it should not have changed the result.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent, and Lumpkin, J., disqualified.*
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Rhombic  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, John
Hartman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
18th day of November, 2003.


/s/ John Hartman
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of CVF
Technologies Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 16, 2004                           /s/ Jeffrey I. Dreben
                                                 ---------------------
                                                 Jeffrey I. Dreben,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 16, 2004                           /s/ Robert L. Miller
                                                 --------------------
                                                 Robert L. Miller,
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

      This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Form 10-Q
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company unless such
incorporation is expressly referenced therein.
#### Bernard La Vine, Doing Business as La Vine Real Estate, Appellant-Respondent, v Harlan La Vine, Respondent-Appellant.

Order unanimously modified, on the law, and in the exercise of discretion, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: From 1967 until 1981 plaintiff uncle employed defendant nephew in the business known as La Vine Real Estate without a written agreement. In 1980, defendant performed appraisal work for MCI Telecommunications Corporation for which plaintiff received payment. In early 1981, while defendant was still employed by plaintiff, MCI contacted defendant to provide brokerage services in connection with leases in six cities. In June 1981, defendant left plaintiff’s employ, took the MCI brokerage files with him, and claimed the right to all MCI brokerage commissions. Plaintiff brought this action, seeking recovery of those commissions, which he estimated *1019exceeded $160,000. Defendant moved for summary judgment and Special Term granted partial summary judgment to defendant dismissing plaintiff’s claims for any commissions earned after defendant left plaintiff’s employment. It also found that any brokerage commissions earned while defendant was employed by plaintiff belonged to plaintiff, and it ordered a hearing to determine whether any leases were negotiated while defendant was still in plaintiff’s employ.

We disagree with the court’s conclusion that as a matter of law defendant’s duties as an employee included brokerage work. A question of fact exists whether under all the circumstances there was an implied agreement that defendant was to perform brokerage work as part of his employment. A trial is required to resolve this issue. In addition, the issue of whether plaintiff is entitled to any commissions earned after the termination of defendant’s employment is best resolved after all the facts have been developed upon the trial.

Accordingly, the order appealed from is modified by deleting from the next to last ordering paragraph that part granting partial summary judgment and by deleting the last paragraph ordering a fact-finding hearing. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Tenney, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agroecosystem Management Research: Lincoln, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lincoln, Nebraska Agroecosystem Management Research People & Locations







David R Walla
                        Agroecosystem Management Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Lab Technician (Soils)
                        Phone: (402) 472-9210
                        
                        
                        Fax: (402) 472-4020(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov