alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HTML Editor


EXHIBIT 4.1


 


DESCRIPTION OF COMMON SHARES


 


The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares, without par value, of which 126,978,470 are issued and outstanding as at the date of this Annual Report.


 


Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend any meetings of shareholders of the Company and at any meetings of shareholders to cast one vote for each Common Share held. Holders of Common Shares do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors and accordingly, holders of a majority of the Common Shares entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all directors standing for election.  Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the board of directors of the Company at its discretion from fund legally available therefor and to receive a pro rata share of the assets of the Company available for distribution to the shareholders in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company after payment of debts and other liabilities, in each case subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to any other series or class of shares ranking senior in priority to or on a pro-rata basis with the holders of Common Shares with respect to dividends or liquidation.  There are no pre-emptive, subscription, conversion or redemption rights attached to the Common Shares nor do they contain any sinking or purchase fund provisions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,106,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,098,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,422,894
<PP&E>                                         619,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,554,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,653,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,010
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,554,413
<SALES>                                      1,637,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,637,307
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,658,362
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,976
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### BRUNO, Respondent, v. REYNOLDS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Frank V. Bruno against Martin Reynolds.

*1119No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 27, 2018

d0920

Order 

Clerk

September 27, 2018

154552 & (88) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154552

COA: 325313

Saginaw CC: 14-039760-FC

JOHN HENRY GRANDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of September 12, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the September 

13, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

People v Chatman (Docket No. 155184). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having 

been denied in Chatman on March 9, 2018, 501 Mich 1011 (2018), the application is 

again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of People v Swilley (Docket 

No. 154684) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may 

resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the 

application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

The motion for leave to file a supplemental brief remains pending.
##### 



EXHIBIT 15.01 April 29, 2005 Hartford Life, Inc.
200 Hopmeadow Street
Simsbury, Connecticut We have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Hartford Life, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) for the periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, as indicated in our
report dated April 29, 2005; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information. We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, is incorporated by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 333-28805, 333-28807 and 333-34076 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos.
333-21865, 333-56283 and 333-60944 on Form S-3. We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act
of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and
11 of that Act. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Hartford, Connecticut 37
#### Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company *et al. v.*Morse.

Beck, J.

1. Where personal property belonging”to a partnership composed of two persons was destroyed by fire through the negligence of a railroad company, which consisted in a failure to properly equip its engines with suitable spark-arresters and other essential equipment of locomotive steam-engines, and subsequently to the commission of the tort resulting in the destruction of the property one of the partners died, the surviving partner could by suit enforce the liability of the railroad company for the tort as a surviving partner, without joining in the action the personal representative of the deceased partner, it appearing that it was expressly stipulated in the articles of partnership that in ease of the death of either partner the other partner should have the authority to wind up the affairs of the partnership.

*(a)*Whether or not without such provision in the articles of partnership the surviving partner alone could enforce the liability by action it is not necessary to consider.

*(b)*The court declines upon review to reverse the ruling in the case of *City of Atlanta*v. *Dooly,*74 *Ga.*702.

2. Where an insurance company had paid to the owners of the property destroyed an amount for insurance, not exceeding the value of the property, and the plaintiff, the surviving partner in this case, in instituting action to recover damages against the tort-feasor in an amount equal to the insurance made the insurance company the usee in the suit, this did not furnish ground of complaint to the railroad company, whether the, insurance company would have been entitled to recover under the application of the doctrine of subrogation or not.

*(a)*Whether the case of *Holcomb*v. *Richmond &c. Railroad Co.,*78 *Ga.*776 (3 S. E. 755), is sound in all of its rulings or not, as to its authority for the ruling allowing this suit in the name of the owner of *111the property destroyed, for the use of the insurance company, the court thinks it is sound, and declines, upon review, to reverse the ruling upon that point.

February 10, 1915.

Action, for damages. Before Judge Walker. Wilkes superior court. January 29, 1914.

*Joseph B. & Bryan Gumming*and *Howard & Slaton,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Samuel H. Sibley*and *G. H. & B. S. Gohen,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetics Research: Columbia, MO
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Columbia, Missouri Plant Genetics Research People & Locations







Kerri L Bentley
                        Plant Genetics Research

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (573) 882-4734
                        
                        
                        Fax: (573) 884-7850(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>
 
             [LETTERHEAD OF ICON INTERNATIONAL, INC. APPEARS HERE]



                                                      October 20, 1997


Mr. Eric Van Atta
American Artists Film Corporation
1245 Fowler Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Ga. 30318

Dear Eric:

As discussed, we are in agreement to extend the expiration date of your $500,000
in Trade Credits to 12/31/98, and this letter so extends them.

I hope you are prospering, and we look forward to continuing our relationship.

                                                          Sincerely,

                                                          /s/ Lance Lundberg
                                                          ------------------
                                                          Lance Lundberg


cc: R. Lellio
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Improvement and Protection Research: Salinas, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Salinas, California Crop Improvement and Protection Research People Eric B. Brennan







My Thoughts on Open Access Science and Publicationsheadline bar My Philosophy on Open Access Science and Publications   /ARSUserFiles/21904/Photos/Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white_green rs.png  This page is a work in progress, but here's a link to an excellent blog by Biologist Michael Eisen at the University of California, Berkeley that I encourage all to read. It'sbased on a talk he gave at the Commonwealth Club of California titled Reinventing Scientific Communication that you can listen to here.  Michael is the co-founder of the Public Library of Science. My first open-access paper was published on PLoS One in 2020, which is a hint of where I'm headed.  Here's a boycott that I've joined with thousands to other scientists that might interest you. **Return to Eric Brennan's Home Page**


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit  32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted), James W. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of
SpaceDev,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies  that,  to the best of his
knowledge:

The  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2004, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and the information
contained  in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of this 10th
day  of  May  2004.




By:     /s/  James  W.  Benson
----------------------------------
          James  W.  Benson
         Chief  Executive  Officer
#### Armistead *v.*Whelchel, administrator.

April 15, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Brand. Jackson superior court. July 6, 1914.

*E. C. Armistead,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. J. Shackelford,*contra.

Hill, J.

There being no error of law complained of, and there being sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:1
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 2 of 22 PageID #:2
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 3 of 22 PageID #:3
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 4 of 22 PageID #:4
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 5 of 22 PageID #:5
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 6 of 22 PageID #:6
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 7 of 22 PageID #:7
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 8 of 22 PageID #:8
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 9 of 22 PageID #:9
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 10 of 22 PageID #:10
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 11 of 22 PageID #:11
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 12 of 22 PageID #:12
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 13 of 22 PageID #:13
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 14 of 22 PageID #:14
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 15 of 22 PageID #:15
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 16 of 22 PageID #:16
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 17 of 22 PageID #:17
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 18 of 22 PageID #:18
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 19 of 22 PageID #:19
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 20 of 22 PageID #:20
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 21 of 22 PageID #:21
Case: 1:04-cv-00321 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/16/04 Page 22 of 22 PageID #:22
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Meat Safety and Quality: Clay Center, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USMARC Home
                    USMARC Research Units
                        Genetics and Animal Breeding
                                    Livestock Bio Systems
                                    Nutrition, Growth and Physiology
                                    Animal Health GenomicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Clay Center, Nebraska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Meat Safety and Quality People & Locations







Jody  Gallagher
                        Meat Safety and Quality

                        




                        
                        Secretary (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (402) 762-4222
                        
                        
                        Fax: (402) 762-4149(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 22
- 00029
- CR No. 10
- 22
- 00030
- CR
DAVID WESLEY COWDEN , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 249th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No s . DC
- F202200026 and DC
- F202200027

MEMORANDUM OPINION
In each of these two causes, Appellant David Wesley Cowden attempts to appeal
from the trial court’s January 13, 2022 order denying his motion to dismiss under article
32.01 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We will dismiss these appeals for want of juri sdiction. Jurisdiction must be expressly given to the courts of appeals. Ragston v. State , 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Ford , 553 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.

— WacoCowden v. State Page 2 2018, orig. proceeding). The standard for determining jurisdiction is n ot whether the appeal is precluded by law, but whether the appeal is authorized by law. Abbott v. State , 271 S.W.3d 694, 696

– 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Ford , 553 S.W.3d at 731. Article 44.02 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides, “A defendant in an y criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed.” T EX

. C ODE
C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 44.02. This statutory right of appeal has been interpreted as allowing appeal only from a final judgment. See State v. Sellers , 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). The courts of appeals therefore do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been otherwise expressly granted by law. Apolinar v. State , 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. C rim. App. 1991). We have not found any rule or any statutory or constitutional provision that would authorize Cowden’s appeal s from the trial court’s January 13, 2022 interlocutory order denying his motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the order is not appeal able, and we have no jurisdiction to entertain Cowden’s appeals from the order. See id. Notwithstanding that we are dismissing these appeals, Cowden may file a motion for rehearing with this Court within fifteen days after the judgment of this Court is
rendered. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1. If Cowden desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after either the day this C ourt’s judgment is rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this Court. See
id. R. 68.2(a).Cowden v. State Page 3 MATT JOHNSON Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson , and Justice Smith Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed February 16, 2022 Do not publish [CR25]