alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Williams *v.*Hinson *et al.*

July 20, 1915.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Conyers. Jeff Davis superior court. February 19, 1914.

*Grant & Rogers,*for plaintiff.

*Bennett & Swain,*for defendants.

Beck, J.

The plaintiff filed a petition to enjoin the enforcement of an execution issued from a justice’s court, contending that the execution and the judgment upon which it was based were void, because the judgment was rendered by the justice at a time when the court could not legally be held, inasmuch as another date had properly, and in accordance with the statute, been fixed and appointed for the holding of the court. The petition, at the appearance term of the superior court, was dismissed upon demurrer. *Meld:*Without discussing the question as to whether or not the judgment was void as contended by petitioner, the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition. If the execution and judgment referred to were void for the reasons assigned, the petitioner had an adequate remedy at law; for he could have resisted the enforcement of the execution by filing an affidavit of illegality. *Planters Loan and Savings Bank*v. *Berry,*91 *Ga.*264 (18 S. E. 137) ; *Hilson*v. *Kitchens,*107 *Ga.*230 (33 S. E. 71, 73 Am. St. R. 119) ; *Harbig*v. *Freund,*69 *Ga.*180.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Gexa Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31,2004 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof, I, David K. Holeman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ David K. Holeman    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David K. Holeman        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Dated: April 29, 2005   |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Gexa Corp. and will be retained by Gexa Corp.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Cistera Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory T. Royal, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of March 31, 2010 and for the periods then
  ended.





/s/ Gregory T. Royal
              Gregory
      T. RoyalChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)





Date:
August 9, 2010








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersignedofficers of Force Protection, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report forthe quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | Date: May 15, 2007      |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ Gordon McGilton          |   |   |
|   | Gordon McGilton              |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer      |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | Date: May 15, 2007      |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ Michael Durski           |   |   |
|   | Michael Durski               |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer      |   |
|   | Principal Accounting Officer |   |

 

----
Case: 1:02-cv-03310 Document #: 118 Filed: 03/24/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1247
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1377 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1377

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 1997

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Act incorporating the American Legion to make a technical 
                              correction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 5 of the 
Act entitled ``An Act to Incorporate the American Legion'', approved 
September 16, 1919 (41 Stat. 285; 36 U.S.C. 45) is amended by striking 
``December 22, 1961'' and inserting ``February 28, 1961''.

            Passed the Senate November 5, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Harry J. White, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: November 19, 2002                                 /s/ HARRY J. WHITE, JR.
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Harry J. White, Jr.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00187

- CV

I N THE M

ATTER OF T HE

G UARDIANSHIP OF M AY K. J ONES

, AN

I NCAPACITATED P ERSON §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from Probate Court

of Denton County (PR

- 2014

- 00591

- 01)

April 16, 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

J UDGMEN T

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DI STRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice D ana Womack
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit: El Reno, OK
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area El Reno, Oklahoma Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit People & Locations







Emily R Croney
                        Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Aid
                        Phone: (405) 262-5291
                        
                        
                        Fax: (405) 262-0450(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research: Fort Pierce, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Links
                        USDA Main Page
                                    ARS Main PageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research People & Locations







Christopher  Lasser
                        Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (772) 462-5928
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1198 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1198

   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide permanent 
    authority for entry into the United States of certain religious 
                                workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 1997

   Mr. Abraham (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
    DeWine, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Biden, and Mr. D'Amato) introduced the 
                  following bill; which was read twice

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide permanent 
    authority for entry into the United States of certain religious 
                                workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Workers Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR ENTRY INTO UNITED STATES OF CERTAIN 
              RELIGIOUS WORKERS.

    Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking ``before October 1, 
1997,'' each of the two places it appears.
                                 <all>
```
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 134

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the licensing of

ammunition manufacturers, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to

the licensing of ammunition manufacturers, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That this Act may be cited as the ‘‘Handgun Ammunition

4 Control Act of 1997’’.

5 SECTION 1. RECORDS OF DISPOSITION OF AMMUNITION.

6 (a) AMENDMENT OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES

7 CODE.—Section 923(g) of title 18, United States Code,

8 is amended—
2

•S 134 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting after the

2 second sentence ‘‘Each licensed importer and manu3 facturer of ammunition shall maintain such records

4 of importation, production, shipment, sale, or other

5 disposition of ammunition at the place of business of

6 such importer or manufacturer for such period and

7 in such form as the Secretary may by regulations

8 prescribe. Such records shall include the amount,

9 caliber, and type of ammunition.’’; and

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new

11 paragraph:

12 ‘‘(8) Each licensed importer or manufacturer of am13 munition shall annually prepare a summary report of im14 ports, production, shipments, sales, and other dispositions

15 during the preceding year. The report shall be prepared

16 on a form specified by the Secretary, shall include the

17 amounts, calibers, and types of ammunition that were dis18 posed of, and shall be forwarded to the office specified

19 thereon not later than the close of business on the date

20 specified by the Secretary.’’.

21 (b) STUDY OF CRIMINAL USE AND REGULATION OF

22 AMMUNITION.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall re23 quest the National Academy of Sciences to—
3

•S 134 IS

1 (1) prepare, in consultation with the Secretary,

2 a study of the criminal use and regulation of ammu3 nition; and

4 (2) to submit to Congress, not later than July

5 31, 1998, a report with recommendations on the po6 tential for preventing crime by regulating or restrict7 ing the availability of ammunition.

8 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LICENSING FEES FOR MANUFACTUR9 ERS OF AMMUNITION.

10 Section 923(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

11 amended—

12 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B),

13 (C), and (D) as subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), and

14 (E), respectively;

15 (2) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as re16 designated, the following:

17 ‘‘(A) of .25 caliber, .32 caliber, or 9 mm

18 ammunition, a fee of $10,000 per year;’’

Æ
Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:369

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:370

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:371

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:372

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:373

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:374

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:375

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:376

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:377

Case: 1:02-cr-00444 Document #: 98 Filed: 03/24/03 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:378
#### DeBow *v.*Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co.

February 11, 1915.

Beck, J.

Where, during the term and within two days after the rendition

of a verdict in the superior court, the losing party presented to the court a motion for a new trial in all respects regular, and thereupon a rule nisi was issued, calling upon the opposite party to show cause at a later date (the same being specified in the order) why the motion should not be granted, and, in connection with the rule nisi and in the same order, the movant was granted an extension of time (allowing “until the hearing of the motion”) in which to prepare and present for approval and filing a brief of the evidence in the case, it being recited in the order that it was “made to appear that it was impossible to make out and prepare a brief of the testimony in said case before the adjournment of court,” and it further appearing that this motion and rule nisi were promptly served upon the respondent, the court did not err in overruling a motion to vacate the order allowing the movant an extension of time within which to perfect the motion in the respects mentioned, upon the grounds: (1) that the order was granted ex parte, without any rule nisi thereon directed to the plaintiff to show cause against the grant of the order, without notice to the plaintiff, without his knowledge or consent or an opportunity to show cause against the grant of the order, and therefore the court was without jurisdiction to grant the same; (2) that the time granted in the order was in,excess of the time allowed by law for the filing of a brief of evidence upon a motion for a new trial, and was unreasonable, and in this respect the order was an abuse of the discretion vested in the court; and (3) that the court was without power to grant the defendant the privilege which, under the terms of the order, extended the time for filing the brief of evidence beyond the next regular term of court and thenceforward indefinitely in the futura, and it appeared from the record that no brief of evidence had been filed, and that more than 30 days had elapsed since, the adjournment of the term of court at which the verdict complained of was rendered.

(a.) If the time allowed by way of extension was as a matter of fact unreasonable, the respondent should have moved promptly to vacate this order and to set the case down for a hearing at some time less remote than that named in the order granted. In the present case the rule nisi was granted on the 17th day of June, 1911, and served on the same day, and the motion to vacate and dismiss was apparently made on the 19th day of July, 1912.

*Jiidgment affirmed.*

*All ihe Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent, and Atkinson, J., disqualified.*

*153Motion for new trial. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. September 23, 1913.

*Atkinson & Born,*for plaintiff.

*Anderson & Rountree,*for defendant.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1347

To permit the city of Cleveland, Ohio, to convey certain lands that the

United States conveyed to the city.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 30, 1997

Mr. GLENN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To permit the city of Cleveland, Ohio, to convey certain

lands that the United States conveyed to the city.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

4 For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘fair market

5 value’’ shall have the meaning provided that term by the

6 Secretary of Transportation, by regulation.

7 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO GRANT WAIVERS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law and subject to section 47153 of title 49, United

10 States Code, and section 3, the Secretary of Transpor-
2

•S 1347 IS

1 tation may waive any of the terms contained in the deed

2 of conveyance described in subsection (b).

3 (b) DEED OF CONVEYANCE.—The deed of convey4 ance described in this subsection is the deed of conveyance

5 issued by the United States and dated January 10, 1967,

6 for the conveyance of lands to the city of Cleveland, Ohio,

7 for use by the city for airport purposes.

8 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS.

9 (a) FAIR MARKET VALUE OR EQUIVALENT BENE10 FIT.—As a condition to receiving a waiver under this sec11 tion, the city of Cleveland, Ohio, may convey an interest

12 in the lands described in section 2(b) only if the city re13 ceives, in exchange for the interest—

14 (1) an amount equal to the fair market value

15 of the interest; or

16 (2) an equivalent benefit.

17 (b) USE OF AMOUNTS OR EQUIVALENT BENEFITS.—

18 Any amount or equivalent benefit that is received by the

19 city of Cleveland shall be used by the city for—

20 (1) the development, improvement, operation, or

21 maintenance of a public airport; or

22 (2) lands (including any improvements to those

23 lands) that produce revenues that are used for air24 port development purposes.

Æ