alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                            RED BRICK SYSTEMS, INC.
 
                              STATEMENT REGARDING
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                1996        1995       1994
                                             ----------- ---------- -----------
<S>                                          <C>         <C>        <C>
Net income (loss)..........................  $ 3,818,324 $  308,387 $(1,481,050)
                                             =========== ========== ===========
Computations of weighted average common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding:
  Weighted average common equivalent shares
   attributable to convertible preferred
   stock...................................          --   5,450,041         --
  Weighted average common shares
   outstanding.............................   10,895,044  1,963,580   1,318,988
  Weighted average common equivalent shares
   attributable to stock options and
   warrants................................    1,773,417    947,475         --
  Common shares sold and common equivalent
   shares from stock options granted or
   issued during the twelve-month period
   prior to the Company's initial public
   offering................................          --   1,604,107   1,604,107
                                             ----------- ---------- -----------
  Shares used in computing net income per
   share...................................   12,668,461  9,965,203   2,923,095
                                             =========== ========== ===========
Net income (loss) per share................  $      0.30 $     0.03 $     (0.51)
                                             =========== ========== ===========
</TABLE>
 
  Fully diluted computation not presented since such amounts differ by less
than 3% of the net income per share amount shown above.
November 23, 2015 Court ofAppeals Third District ofTexas P.O. Box 12547 Austin, TX 78711-2547 

### Comal County OFFICE OF DISTRICT CLERK. 

### Heather N. Kellar

RE: Court ofAppeals Number: 03-15-00643-CV Trial Court Case Number: C2014-1453C 

### Styled: Bryan D. Lippert, Jane Lippert VS. Carnal Trace Homeowners Association

Dear Clerk: Please be advised that the Clerk's Record, Volume I ofI on the above styled and numbered case is ready to be emailed electronically to the Court ofAppeals, Third District ofTexas. The cost for the Clerk's Record is $735.00, ofwhich the full amount is outstanding at this time. The due date for the record is November 24, 2015. Once

# ~v:t**s~;;**

# besubmitted.

Heather N. Kellar Carnal County District Clerk 150 N. Seguin Ave., STE 304 New Braunfels, TX 78130 Ph: 830-221-1251 Fx: 830-608-2006 kellah@co.comal.tx.us

cc: Mr. Christopher Weber Should you need anything further please let me know.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TRAVIS MARTIN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 23

- 1171

[ July 20, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 99

- 1928CF10A

.
Travis Martin, Crestview, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , C IKLIN and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1175 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1175

To reauthorize the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Citizen 
              Advisory Commission for 10 additional years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 1997

    Mr. Lautenberg (for himself and Mr. Torricelli) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Citizen 
              Advisory Commission for 10 additional years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL 
              RECREATION AREA CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION.

    Section 5 of Public Law 101-573 (16 U.S.C. 460o note) is amended by 
striking ``10'' and inserting ``20''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 43663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17023]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question 
whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the 
BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than 
September 9, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Spaniel, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521. Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bd8f4f6f6fef5efe8b5faebebf7f2f8faeff2f4f5e8dbebf3f2f7b5fde9f9b5f4e9fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="baf9d5d7d7dfd4cec994dbcacad6d3d9dbced3d5d4c9facad2d3d694dcc8d894d5c8dd">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Columbia Bank MHC and Columbia Financial, Inc., both of Fair 
Lawn, New Jersey; to acquire Freehold MHC and Freehold Bancorp, and 
indirectly acquire Freehold Bank, all of Freehold, New Jersey, and 
thereby engage in operating a savings association pursuant to Section 
225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 5, 
2021.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-17023 Filed 8-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Orders & ServicesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes People & Locations







Mary  Parker
                        Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes

                        




                        
                        Secretary (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (530) 752-6504
                        
                        
                        Fax: (530) 752-5974(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Independent Auditors' Report







The Board of Directors
The Thaxton Group, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Thaxton
Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Thaxton Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of their
operations and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.



                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

March 25, 1998
# Official Journal L 260/6 Au

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 260 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 476 August 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 260

English edition

Legislation

Volume 476 August 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 1421/2004 of 19 July 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1422/2004 of 5 August 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 6 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 1421/2004 of 19 July 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1422/2004 of 5 August 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

6

| | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | 2004/589/EC:Council Decision of 19 July 2004 concerning the notification to the Republic of Korea of the withdrawal of the European Community from the Agreement on telecommunications procurement between the European Community and the Republic of Korea | 8 |
| | | Commission |
| | * | 2004/590/EC:Commission Decision of 4 June 2004 recognising the fully operational character of the Cypriot database for bovine animals
  (notified under document number C(2004) 1969)
  (Only the Greek text is authentic) (1) | 9 |

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Council

*

2004/589/EC:Council Decision of 19 July 2004 concerning the notification to the Republic of Korea of the withdrawal of the European Community from the Agreement on telecommunications procurement between the European Community and the Republic of Korea

8

Commission

*

2004/590/EC:Commission Decision of 4 June 2004 recognising the fully operational character of the Cypriot database for bovine animals
  (notified under document number C(2004) 1969)
  (Only the Greek text is authentic) (1)

(notified under document number C(2004) 1969)

9

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### In the Matter of Antonio Di Stefano, Respondent, v William C. Miller, as Clerk of the Village of Plandome Heights, Respondent. Thomas D. Conway et al., Intervenors-Appellants.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the Clerk of the Village of Piándome Heights to issue a certificate in accordance with Village Law § 7-728 attesting *576to the date of submission to the Planning Board of the Village of Piándome Heights of petitioner’s plat for approval and the failure to take action thereupon within the statutorily prescribed 60-day period, the intervenors appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), entered October 16, 1984, which denied that branch of their motion which sought to vacate a judgment of the same court, dated April 19, 1984, which granted the petition.

Order affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The case law interpreting the statutory provision at issue here, Village Law § 7-728, as well as the similar provision found in Town Law § 276, makes clear that where the only objection to certification is the plat’s failure to comply with zoning ordinances, a plat submitted for final approval is nonetheless entitled to a certificate deeming it approved by default, as a matter of law, if it is not acted upon within the statutorily prescribed time limits *(see, Matter of Northern Operating Corp. v Chamberlain,*34 AD2d 686, *affd*31 NY2d 704; *Matter of Fishman v Arnzen,*29 AD2d 954; *Matter of Scarsdale Meadows v Smith,*20 AD2d 906; *see also, Matter of Sun Beach Real Estate Dev. Corp. v Anderson,*98 AD2d 367, 369, *affd*62 NY2d 965). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Federal Trade Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:03−cv−03904

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

Kevin Trudeau, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, May 16, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Defendant's motion to

continue [667] hearing is denied. Status hearing held on 5/16/2013. A brief status hearing

is set for 5/20/2013 at 1:30 p.m. Mailed notice (gds)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 671 Filed: 05/16/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:9631
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jomo Kenyatta, Also Known as Daniel Green, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.), rendered July 31, 1980, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant maintains on appeal that he is entitled to summary reversal of his conviction for assault in the first degree because the victim’s medical records, which were admitted into evidence at trial, have since been lost. These records were *740received into evidence to supplement the victim’s testimony regarding his injuries, in order to establish that the victim suffered "serious physical injury” as defined by Penal Law § 10.00 (10).

We note that the defendant has failed to assert that exception was taken with respect to the prosecution’s alleged failure to establish that the victim suffered serious physical injury. Indeed, this was not even put in issue during the trial. The complainant’s medical records were admitted into evidence upon stipulations. As such, the issue has not been preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Glass,*43 NY2d 283, 287).

In any event, it is only upon an appropriate showing by the defendant that alternate methods are unavailable to provide an adequate record from which this court could discern the existence of genuine issues that a defendant is entitled to automatic reversal *(People v Rivera,*39 NY2d 519; *People v Glass, supra).*The defendant has failed to allege, let alone establish, that efforts to procure a certified copy of the medical records from the hospital have been or would be unavailing *(cf. People v Gallella,*23 AD2d 285).

It is not enough to merely allege that documentary evidence has been lost *(People v Lopez,*97 AD2d 5). "A defendant has a greater burden in that he must set forth appealable grounds, i.e., the nature of those issues which would have been raised on appeal had the [evidence] * * * been available” *(People v Bell,*36 AD2d 406, 408, *affd*29 NY2d 882). A defendant must state appealable grounds in order to overcome the presumption of regularity which attends all judgments of conviction *(People v Bell, supra).*A "defendant must set forth his grounds for appeal * * * to enable a reviewing court to determine whether the appealable issues which would have been raised can, nevertheless, be properly evaluated, passed upon, and disposed of, without the need to refer to the missing [evidence]” *(People v Bell, supra,*at p 408). This he has failed to do.

Furthermore, there is no basis on this record warranting a modification of the sentence. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 8.1.

List of Subsidiaries of De Rigo S.p.A.

|                                               |  |                         
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Name                                           |  | Country of Incorporation
|                                               |  |                         
|Quattro Valli Italian Flair S.r.l              |  | Italy                   
|Vogart Line España S.a                         |  | Spain                   
|De Rigo (UK) Ltd.                              |  | United Kingdom          
|De Rigo Hellas A.E.E                           |  | Greece                  
|De Rigo Deutschland Gmbh                       |  | Germany                 
|Atair Opt. Geräte GesmbH                       |  | Austria                 
|De Rigo France S.a                             |  | France                  
|De Rigo Nederland B.V                          |  | The Netherlands         
|De Rigo Asia Ltd.                              |  | Hong Kong               
|De Rigo Hong Kong Ltd.                         |  | Hong Kong               
|De Rigo Japan Co., Ltd.                        |  | Japan                   
|De Rigo Singapore Pte Ltd.                     |  | Singapore               
|De Rigo U.S.A. , INC                           |  | United States           
|E.I.D. U.S.A. L.L.C                            |  | United States           
|European Vision Ltd.                           |  | United Kingdom          
|Vantios Group Ltd.                             |  | United Kingdom          
|Dollond & Aitchison Ltd.                       |  | United Kingdom          
|D&A Contact Lenses Ltd.                        |  | Jersey                  
|D&A Eyewear Ltd.                               |  | United Kingdom          
|D&A Professional Services Ltd.                 |  | United Kingdom          
|Vantios Ltd.                                   |  | United Kingdom          
|Bindi Investment Ltd.                          |  | Jersey                  
|General Optica Internacional S.a               |  | Spain                   
|General Optica Ltd.                            |  | United Kingdom          
|General Optica S.a                             |  | Spain                   
|E.I.D. Eyewear International Distribution S.A. |  | Luxembourg              
|E.I.D. Distribution Hong Kong Ltd.             |  | Hong Kong               
|E.I.D. Distribution Asia Pacific Ltd.          |  | Hong Kong               
|E.I.D. Distribution Japan Ltd.                 |  | Japan                   
|E.I.D. Italia S.r.l                            |  | Italia
Order entered April 15, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00157-CV

JUSTINA MAGALLON, Appellant

V.

RAMON MAGALLON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-02829

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to extend time to file her brief. We 

GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received by the Clerk of the Court

April 13, 2020 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE