alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) I.D. Nos. 2109011557

 ) 2105014511

DEANDRE J. CHRISTOPHER, ) 1912028570

 ) 2005006266 

Defendant. ) 

ORDER 

Submitted: January 30, 2023 

Decided: April 17, 2023 

AND NOW TO WIT, this 17th day of April 2023, upon consideration of

Deandre J. Christopher (“Defendant”)’s Motion for Modification of Sentence 

under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35, the sentence imposed upon the 

Defendant, and the record in this case, it appears to the Court that:

1. On December 7, 2021, Defendant pled guilty to Stalking, NonCompliance with Bond Conditions (felony), Reckless Endangering Second Degree, 

Offensive Touching, and Non-Compliance with Bond Conditions (unclassified).

1

 On 

March 11, 2022, Defendant was sentenced to: (1) for Stalking, three 

years at Level V, suspended after nine months, for one year at Level III, with 

GPS monitoring; (2) for Non-Compliance with Bond Conditions (felony), two years 

at Level V, suspended for one year at Level II, with GPS monitoring; (3) Reckless 

1

 Crim. I.D. No. 2105014511, D.I. 3. 
2 

Endangering Second Degree, one year at Level V, suspended after six months, for one 

year at Level III, with GPS monitoring; (4) for Offensive Touching, thirty days at Level 

V, suspended for one year at Level III, with GPS monitoring; and (5) for NonCompliance with Bond Conditions (unclassified), a fine in the amount of $500.00.2

 

2. On January 20, 2023, Defendant filed a Motion for Modification of 

his Sentence asking the Court to remove GPS monitoring.

3

 In support of his 

request, he asserts that removing a GPS monitoring condition will help him to be 

able to succeed as a truck driver.4

 The Court also received a letter from Jaden 

McKinley, Director/CEO of American Driver Training Academy, Inc., 

commending Defendant’s performance in a re-entry program offered by the same 

company through DOC.

5

 

3. The Court acknowledges and commends Defendant’s successful 

performance in the transitioning program. Defendant's sentence, however, was 

imposed pursuant to a Plea Agreement between the State and Defendant that 

included conditions to include GPS monitoring.6

 

4. Due to the nature of the charges—including Stalking and NonCompliance with Bond Conditions—the sentence was and remains appropriate for 

2

 Crim. I.D. No. 2105014511, D.I. 4. 

3

 Crim. I.D. No. 2105014511, D.I. 6. 

4 Id. (explaining in detail that removing GPS monitoring will enable Defendant to participate in a 

six-week training program, drive interstate and intrastate, perform overnight driving 

assignments, and get new jobs). 

5 Id. (attaching the letter from Jaden McKinley).

6 See Crim. I.D. No. 2105014511, D.I. 4. 
3 

all the reasons stated at the time of sentencing.

IT IS SO ORDERED that the Motion for Modification of Sentence is

DENIED. 

/s/ Vivian L. Medinilla

 Vivian L. Medinilla

 Judge

 

oc: Prothonotary

cc: Defendant

Department of Justice

Investigative Services Office
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Paul DePond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Notify Technology Corporation.



By:

/s/ Paul F. DePondName:

Paul F. DePondTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, Gerald W. Rice, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Notify
Technology Corporation.



By:

/s/ Gerald W. RiceName:

Gerald W. RiceTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Notify Technology Corporation and will be retained by Notify Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2022432EN.01001801.xml

| 14.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Helsingin Bussiliikenne v Commission

(Case T-603/19) (1)

(State aid - Coach and bus transport - Equipment loan and capital loans granted by the City of Helsinki - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Economic continuity - Procedural rights of interested parties - Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 432/19)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: O. Hyvönen and N. Rosenlund, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Huttunen and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski and H. Leppo, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Nobina Oy (in Espoo, Finland), Nobina AB (Solna, Sweden) (represented by: J. Åkermarck and T. Kalliokoski, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1814 of 28 June 2019 on State aid SA.33846 — (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by Finland for Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy (OJ 2020 L 404, p. 10).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures, as well as those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures, as well as those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.

---
**Exhibit 15.1**

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-46155) pertaining to the Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-88466) pertaining to the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, of our reports dated April 27, 2006, July 25, 2006 andOctober 31, 2006, relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. that are included in its Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006 andSeptember 30, 2006. 

 

New Orleans, Louisiana 

October 31, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Falco, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), rendered April 7, 1983, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, as a felony, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The evidence was sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant’s contention with respect to the jury charge is not preserved for appellate review as he failed to take exception or make a request when the charge was given *(see, People v Whalen,*59 NY2d 273, 280; *People v Nuccie,*57 NY2d 818, 819-820). In any event, the charge was not erroneous. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.
#### Edwards *v.*The State.

April 13, 1915.

Rehearing denied April 23, 1915.

Application for change of venue. Before Judge Highsmith. Glynn superior court. March 22, 1915.

*Max Isaac,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. H. Thomas, solicitor-general,*and *J. T. Colson,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

There was no abuse of discretion in refusing to change the venue, under the facts of the case.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
# C_2021297EN.01003101.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Dansk Erhverv v Commission

(Case T-47/19) (1)

(State aid - Sale of canned beverages in border shops in Germany to foreign residents - Exemption from the deposit on condition that the beverages purchased are consumed outside Germany - Complaint - Decision by the Commission not to raise objections - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Admissibility - Conditions for initiating a formal investigation procedure - Error of law - Serious difficulties - Concept of ‘State aid’ - State resources - Non-imposition of a fine)

(2021/C 297/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dansk Erhverv (Copenhagen, Denmark) (represented by: T. Mygind and H. Peytz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Danmarks Naturfredningsforening (Copenhagen) (represented by: T. Mygind and H. Peytz, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller, R. Kanitz, S. Heimerl and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents), Interessengemeinschaft der Grenzhändler (IGG) (Flensburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Bauer and F. von Hammerstein, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 6315 final of 4 October 2018 concerning State Aid SA.44865 (2016/FC) — Germany — Alleged State aid to German beverage border shops.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2018) 6315 final of 4 October 2018 concerning State aid SA.44865 (2016/FC) — Germany — Alleged State aid to German beverage border shops; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2018) 6315 final of 4 October 2018 concerning State aid SA.44865 (2016/FC) — Germany — Alleged State aid to German beverage border shops;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Dansk Erhverv and Danmarks Naturfredningsforening; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Dansk Erhverv and Danmarks Naturfredningsforening;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and Interessengemeinschaft der Grenzhändler (IGG) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and Interessengemeinschaft der Grenzhändler (IGG) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.

---
Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 105 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:947

Case: 1:02-cv-00256 Document #: 105 Filed: 03/19/03 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:948
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14D0476. BOBBY JOHNSON v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A.

Bobby Johnson filed this application for discretionary appeal, seeking to

challenge the trial court’s order dismissing his quiet title action against Bank of

America, N. A. for failure to state a claim. Under Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI,

Par. III, the Supreme Court has original appellate jurisdiction over cases involving

title to land. Because this application appears to involves title to land, jurisdiction

lies in the Supreme Court. See Tharp v. Harpagon Co., 278 Ga. 654, 655 (1) (604

SE2d 156) (2004). Accordingly, this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the

Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/25/2014

August 25, 2014
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1011

For the relief of Marina Khalina and her son, Albert Miftakhov.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14, 1997

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Marina Khalina and her son, Albert

Miftakhov.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Marina Khalina and her son, Albert

7 Miftakhov, shall be held and considered to have been law8 fully admitted to the United States for permanent resi9 dence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon

10 payment of the required visa fees.
2

•S 1011 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Marina

3 Khalina and her son, Albert Miftakhov, as provided in this

4 Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer

5 to reduce by the appropriate number during the current

6 fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available

7 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

8 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

9 1153(a)).

Æ
Document

Exhibit 4.14

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
AMYRIS, INC.
Amyris, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”),


DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOLLOWING:


FIRST:    That the name of the Corporation is Amyris, Inc.


SECOND:     That the date on which the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was originally filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware is April 15, 2010 under the name Amyris Biotechnologies, Inc.


THIRD:     That, at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board”), the Board duly adopted resolutions setting forth the following proposed amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, declaring said amendment to be advisable and directing the Corporation to submit said amendment to the next annual meeting of the stockholders of said Corporation for consideration thereof, and that, thereafter, pursuant to such resolutions, the Corporation submitted the amendment to the stockholders of the Corporation at such annual meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation duly called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the Delaware General Corporation Law at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of said amendment:


Section 1 of Article IV of the Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


“1. Total Authorized. The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the corporation has authority to issue is Four Hundred Fifty-Five Million (455,000,000) shares, consisting of two classes: Four Hundred Fifty Million (450,000,000) shares of  Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, and Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value per share.”


FOURTH:     That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment of the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by its General Counsel and Secretary this 28th day of May, 2021 and the foregoing facts stated herein are true and correct.


AMYRIS, INC.


By: /s/ Nicole Kelsey
Name: Nicole Kelsey
Title: General Counsel and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Stetson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Stetson  
|Robert J. Stetson      
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 10, 2004
# Official Journal L 198/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 198 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 616 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 198

English edition

Legislation

Volume 616 August 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Notice concerning the entry into force of a Protocol between the European Community and its Member States and the Republic of Lebanon establishing a dispute settlement mechanism applicable to disputes under the trade provisions of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Notice concerning the entry into force of a Protocol between the European Community and its Member States and the Republic of Lebanon establishing a dispute settlement mechanism applicable to disputes under the trade provisions of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42925

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

ROBERT DAVID HOLMES

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 586

Filed: August 7, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Jason D. Scott , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified seven

- year sentence with one

- year determinate term for felony possession of a controlled substance, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appel lant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Robert David Holmes pled guilty to felony possession of a controlled substance , Idaho

Code § 37

- 2732(c) . The district court imposed a unified sentence of seven years, with one year

determinate, to be served con secutive ly with his sentence in a separate case

. Holmes appeals,

contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established an d

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed t he record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Holmes ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.