alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


                        U.S. RESTAURANT PROPERTIES, INC.
   RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<Table>
<Caption>

                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,     SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                             ---------------------------    ----------------------------
                                                 2001           2000            2001            2000
                                             ------------   ------------    ------------    ------------

<S>                                          <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>
Net Income (Loss)                            $      1,787   $     (1,399)   $    (18,132)   $       (990)

Fixed Charges:
   Interest Expense                                 6,568          7,515          13,541          14,901
   Capitalized Interest                                10            218              52             491
   Preferred Dividend Requirements                  1,775          1,775           3,551           3,551
                                             ------------   ------------    ------------    ------------
Total Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
    Dividends                                       8,353          9,508          17,144          18,943

Less Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements          1,775          1,775           3,551           3,551

Earnings                                     $      8,365   $      6,334    $     (4,539)   $     14,402
                                             ============   ============    ============    ============

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                  1.27x          0.82x(1)       (0.33)x          0.94x(1)
Ratio of Earnings to Combined
    Fixed Charges and Preferred
     Stock Dividends                                1.00x          0.67x(1)       (0.26)x          0.76x(1)
</Table>

      (1)   During the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2000,
            the Company recorded a non-cash, unusual charge of $(3,391) and
            $(4,422), respectively, relating to the contingent OP units accrued
            according to the 1997 termination of the management contract.
            Excluding the effects of this unusual charge, the ratio of earnings
            to fixed charges and the ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
            and preferred stock would have been 0.41x and 0.33x respectively for
            the three months ended June 30, 2000 and 0.66x and 0.54x,
            respectively for the six months ended June 30, 2000.



                                       29
----

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on concentrations given at its 129th meeting on 19 October 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case COMP/M.3216 — Oracle/PeopleSoft

(2005/C 206/08)

----
Exhibit 23.1 - Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statementsof Internet America, Inc., on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-70461, 333-72109, 333-77153, 333-80277, 355-80285, and 333-92295) of our report dated September 24, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relatingto the Company’s change in its method of accounting for goodwill), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Internet America, Inc., for the year ended June 30, 2004. 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

September 24, 2004
Case: 1:04-cv-04778 Document #: 5 Filed: 09/03/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:70
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit: El Reno, OK
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area El Reno, Oklahoma Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit People & Locations







Craig W Mittelstaedt
                        Livestock, Forage and Pasture Management Research Unit

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician
                        Phone: (405) 262-5291
                        
                        
                        Fax: (405) 262-0133(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Case: 1:01-cv-06159 Document #: 7 Filed: 03/07/02 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:12
Case: 1:01-cv-06159 Document #: 7 Filed: 03/07/02 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:13
Case: 1:01-cv-06159 Document #: 7 Filed: 03/07/02 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:14
Case: 1:01-cv-06159 Document #: 7 Filed: 03/07/02 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:15
Case: 1:01-cv-06159 Document #: 7 Filed: 03/07/02 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:16
Case: 1:01-cv-06159 Document #: 7 Filed: 03/07/02 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:17
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 153 (Thursday, August 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 44410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17163]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 12, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
July 29, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 715 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-117, CP2021-
119.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-17163 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on External Engagement hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business as follows:

# TIME AND DATE: 

Tuesday, August 3, 2021, from 11:00-11:45 a.m. p.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        The agenda of the teleconference is: Opening                               ( print page 40217)                            remarks and approval of minutes; highlights of Tennessee Roundtable; rollout of S&E Indicators Elementary and Secondary STEM education report; discuss S&E Indicators 2022 engagement plan; and discuss Strategic Engagement Tool.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Nadine Lymn,                         *nlymn@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. To listen to this teleconference, members of the public must send an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference. The National Science Board Office will send requesters a toll-free dial-in number. Meeting information and updates may be found at the National Science Board website at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2021-16111 Filed 7-23-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Abrorkhodja ASKARKHODJAEV, also known as Alex, also known as Abdumajid Maksudov, also known as Abror, Appellant.

No. 11-2111.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2011.

Filed: Dec. 23, 2011.

Willie J. Epps, Jr., Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Abrorkhodja Askarkhodjaev, Adelanto, CA, pro se.

William L. Meiners, Phillip Eugene Porter, Asst. U.S. Attys., William A. (Trey) Alford III, Spec. Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, James F. Felte, Jr., Dep. Chief, Civil Rights Div., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for appellee.

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Under the terms of a written plea agreement that contained an appeal waiver, Abrorkhodja Askarkhodjaev pleaded guilty to conspiracy to engage in racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); fraud in foreign labor contracting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1351 and 1349; identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7); and evasion of corporate employment tax, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201. The district court1 imposed a sentence of 144 months *106in prison, 3 years of supervised release, and $1,007,492.28 in restitution. Mr. As-karkhodjaev filed a pro se notice of appeal, and his counsel has submitted a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which he moves to withdraw. In a pro se filing before this court, Mr. Askarkhodjaev asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

We conclude that Mr. Askarkhodjaev’s claim of ineffective assistance is not barred by the appeal waiver, but also is not appropriate for consideration on direct appeal. *See United States v. McAdory,*501 F.3d 868, 872 (8th Cir.2007). We further conclude that the appeal waiver should be enforced as to all other issues in this appeal. *See United States v. Andis,*333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.2003) (en banc) (court should enforce appeal waiver and dismiss appeal where appeal falls within scope of waiver, both plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result); *see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena,*201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in *Anders*case).

Having independently reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issue not covered by the waiver. Accordingly, we decline to consider Mr. Askarkhodjaev’s ineffective-assistance claim, we dismiss this appeal, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Mr. Askarkhodjaev about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certio-rari.

1

. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Case: 1:01-cv-04366 Document #: 752 Filed: 10/24/03 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:5607
Case: 1:01-cv-04366 Document #: 752 Filed: 10/24/03 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:5608
Case: 1:01-cv-04366 Document #: 752 Filed: 10/24/03 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:5609
Case: 1:01-cv-04366 Document #: 752 Filed: 10/24/03 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:5610
Case: 1:01-cv-04366 Document #: 752 Filed: 10/24/03 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:5611
Case: 1:01-cv-04366 Document #: 752 Filed: 10/24/03 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:5612
Case: 1:01-cv-04366 Document #: 752 Filed: 10/24/03 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:5613
734 A.2d 1281

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Randall Eugene REED, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 9, 1999.

Decided Sept. 8, 1999.

William J. Haberstroh, Altoona, Jackie Atheron Bernard, Duncansville, for Com.

Loreen M. Kemps, Duncansville, for R.E. Reed.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Blair County Court of Common Pleas dated February 13, 1998. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1324

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 5, 1997

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

AN ACT

To deauthorize a portion of the project for navigation, Biloxi

Harbor, Mississippi.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1324 RFH

1 SECTION 1. BILOXI HARBOR, MISSISSIPPI.

2 The portion of the project for navigation, Biloxi Har3 bor, Mississippi, authorized by the River and Harbor Act

4 of 1960 (74 Stat. 481), for the Bernard Bayou Channel

5 beginning near the Air Force Oil Terminal at approxi6 mately navigation mile 2.6 and extending downstream to

the North-South 1 7 ⁄2 of Section 30, Township 7 South,

8 Range 10 West, Harrison County, Mississippi, just west

9 of Kremer Boat Yards, is not authorized after the date

10 of enactment of this Act.

Passed the Senate November 4, 1997.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 153 (Thursday, August 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 44410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-
Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 12, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
July 29, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class 
Package Service Contract 75 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-118, CP2021-120.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-17164 Filed 8-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
twelve months ended July 1, 2006 (the Report), I, Angela Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

September 14, 2006



By:

/s/ Angela ChenAngela ChenChief Financial OfficerPericom Semiconductor Corporation
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May      11, 2009 | /s/ ROBERT E. MEAD                                   |   |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                | Robert      E. Mead                                  |   |
|                                | Chairman,      Chief Executive Officer and President |   |

----
1

The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of

Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3488

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Richard L. Wittman, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 28, 2005

Filed: July 18, 2005

___________

Before SMITH, FAGG, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard L. Wittman pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm,

and was sentenced to 180 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. The

conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal. See United States v. Wittman,

No. 94-1787, 1994 WL 615692 (8th Cir. Nov. 8, 1994) (unpublished per curiam). 

Wittman later moved for clarification of his sentence, asserting that the Bureau

of Prisons (BOP) miscalculated his good-time credit. The district court1

 denied the
-2-

motion after finding that the BOP’s method of calculating good-time credit based on

the amount of time actually served, rather than on the sentence imposed, was a

reasonable interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b).

On appeal, Wittman argues that the BOP’s calculation method is contrary to

Congress’s unambiguous intent that prisoners are eligible to earn 54 days good-time

credit for every year of their sentence. He also argues that, even if section 3624(b)

is ambiguous, the district court should have applied the rule of lenity and resolved the

ambiguity in his favor.

Wittman’s arguments fail. See James v. Outlaw, 126 Fed. Appx. 758, 759 (8th

Cir. 2005) (unpublished per curiam) (finding § 3624(b) ambiguous, because it does

not clearly indicate whether prisoner’s good-time credit should be based on time

served in prison or on sentence imposed, and holding that BOP policy of calculating

good-time credit based on actual time served is entitled to deference and is reasonable

interpretation of § 3624(b)); O’Donald v. Johns, 402 F.3d 172, 173 (3d Cir. 2005)

(per curiam) (finding § 3624(b) ambiguous and holding BOP calculation method is

reasonable; court will not resort to rule of lenity when ambiguity of statute can be

otherwise resolved); Perez-Olivio v. Chavez, 394 F.3d 45, 51-53 (1st Cir. 2005)

(same).

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 1 of 30 PageID #:1755
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 2 of 30 PageID #:1756
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 3 of 30 PageID #:1757
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 4 of 30 PageID #:1758
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 5 of 30 PageID #:1759
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 6 of 30 PageID #:1760
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 7 of 30 PageID #:1761
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 8 of 30 PageID #:1762
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 9 of 30 PageID #:1763
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 10 of 30 PageID #:1764
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 11 of 30 PageID #:1765
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 12 of 30 PageID #:1766
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 13 of 30 PageID #:1767
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 14 of 30 PageID #:1768
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 15 of 30 PageID #:1769
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 16 of 30 PageID #:1770
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 17 of 30 PageID #:1771
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 18 of 30 PageID #:1772
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 19 of 30 PageID #:1773
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 20 of 30 PageID #:1774
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 21 of 30 PageID #:1775
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 22 of 30 PageID #:1776
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 23 of 30 PageID #:1777
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 24 of 30 PageID #:1778
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 25 of 30 PageID #:1779
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 26 of 30 PageID #:1780
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 27 of 30 PageID #:1781
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 28 of 30 PageID #:1782
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 29 of 30 PageID #:1783
Case: 1:02-cv-02590 Document #: 293 Filed: 06/01/05 Page 30 of 30 PageID #:1784