alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge

Ronald A. Guzman Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 02 C 5893 DATE 10/2/2012

CASE

TITLE

Lawrence E. Jaffe Pension Plan, et al. vs. Household International, inc, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

The Court grants defendants’ motion for clarification of the September 21, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and

Order [1826] and clarifies that order as set forth below. The Court will entertain any objections to the

appointment of the Special Master and any further inquiries about the September 21, 2012 order on October 4,

2012 at 9:30 a.m. 

O[ For further details see text below.]

Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT

The Court clarifies the September 21, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and Order as follows:

The Special Master:

(1) shall undertake any and all proceedings necessary to make one or more report(s) and recommendation(s)

(“R&R(s)”) to the Court:

(a) regarding defendants’ objections to certain claims included in the report of the claims

administrator Gilardi & Co [1800], the referral of which to former Magistrate Judge Nolan has

been withdrawn;

(b) identifying the claimants who are entitled to judgment as to liability and determining the

amount of damages each such claimant should receive;

(c) identifying the claimants whose claims must be resolved at trial (i.e., those who responded

“yes” to the claim form question, submitted duplicate claims with conflicting answers to the claim

form question or submitted multiple claims with different answers to the claim form question);

and

(d) identifying the claimants who forfeited their claims by failing to answer the claim form

question and/or supplemental interrogatory.

(2) may communicate ex parte with the Court only upon leave obtained through a properly noticed motion; 

02C5893 Lawrence E. Jaffe Pension Plan, et al. vs. Household International, inc, et al. Page 1 of 2

Case: 1:02-cv-05893 Document #: 1831 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:57363
STATEMENT

(3) may not communicate ex parte with any party;

(4) shall preserve all documents submitted to him in the course of these proceedings and file them with the, or

the appropriate, R&R; 

(5) shall have a certified court reporter record any hearings he conducts; and

(6) shall submit to the Court monthly a statement of the reasonable fees and expenses incurred to carry out his

duties.

After the Court has reviewed and approved them, the parties will pay in equal shares the reasonable fees

and expenses incurred by the Special Master.

The Court will review de novo any timely objections to any portion of an R&R submitted by the Special

Master. 

02C5893 Lawrence E. Jaffe Pension Plan, et al. vs. Household International, inc, et al. Page 2 of 2

Case: 1:02-cv-05893 Document #: 1831 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:57364
#### John Ingram *vs.*Edward B. Marston.

Essex.

November 9, 1911.

November 29, 1911.

Present: Rugg, C. J., Hammond, Braley, Sheldon, & DeCourcy, JJ.

*Practice, Civil,*Findings of trial judge, Exceptions.

Where, at the trial of an action of contract before a judge without a jury, the plaintiff introduces evidence of facts which entitle him to recover the full amount claimed by him, and the defendant, after testifying in direct contradiction to the plaintiff’s evidence, asks the judge to find the facts in accordance with his testimony and on such facts to rule that the plaintiff cannot recover, if the judge, without passing expressly on the defendant’s requests, finds for the plaintiff for the full amount of his claim, this necessarily implies that the judge did not believe the defendant’s testimony and refused to make the finding and ruling asked for by him, and the defendant can have no ground for an exception.

DeCourcy, J.

This was an action of contract by an attorney at law to recover for professional services and. disbursements. The defendant left with the plaintiff some bills for collection and brought to his office a certain probate matter. It is agreed that the charges as set forth in the declaration were reasonable.

*328*J. W. Morton & F. M. Furbush, for the defendant, submitted a brief.*

*T. S. Bubier,*for the plaintiff.

In direct contradiction to the plaintiff’s evidence the defendant testified that the plaintiff agreed to accept a certain percentage of the amount recovered as full compensation in the collection cases; and that he never agreed to be responsible for the legal services in the probate proceedings. He requested the judge * so to find the facts, and in accordance therewith to rule that the plaintiff could not recover. Although the judge did not expressly pass on the requests, his finding for the plaintiff ' for the full amount of his bill necessarily implies a refusal to give them. And he was justified in such refusal, as evidently he did not credit the defendant’s testimony.

The exceptions are frivolous and appear to have been intended for delay. Upon the motion of the plaintiff the exceptions are overruled with double costs and interest at the rate of twelve per cent from the date when the exceptions were allowed.

*So ordered.*

*

*Bell,*J., sitting without a jury.
Case 1:02-cv-03747   Document 43    Filed 05/02/03   Page 1 of 3

Case 1:02-cv-03747   Document 43    Filed 05/02/03   Page 2 of 3

Case 1:02-cv-03747   Document 43    Filed 05/02/03   Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Brent W. Christensen, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meade Instruments Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting     Date: November 29, 2006  By: /s/ Brent W. Christensen       Senior Vice President – Finance and CFO  
29
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,795,561
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (18,078)
<INVENTORY>                                    996,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,906,725
<PP&E>                                         116,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,233,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          547,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,540
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,682,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,233,711
<SALES>                                      1,272,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,485,601
<CGS>                                        1,187,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,187,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,226,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,781,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,781,910)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,781,910)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.78)
        

</TABLE>
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12006E086

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE VI - Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws - Chapter 1 - Rules on competition - Section 1 - Rules applying to undertakings - Article 86***Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0076 - 0076 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0066 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0210 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0029 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available)*

Article 86

1. In the case of public undertakings and undertakings to which Member States grant special or exclusive rights, Member States shall neither enact nor maintain in force any measure contrary to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to those rules provided for in Article 12 and Articles 81 to 89.

2. Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Community.

3. The Commission shall ensure the application of the provisions of this Article and shall, where necessary, address appropriate directives or decisions to Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
# Official Journal L 90/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 90 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6416 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 90

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6416 March 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/456 of 12 March 2021 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1604 as regards the determination of reference values for certain importers and producers for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2023
  (notified under document C(2021) 1155)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/456 of 12 March 2021 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1604 as regards the determination of reference values for certain importers and producers for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2023
  (notified under document C(2021) 1155)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 1155)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 11

- 061 V

(Not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

RICHARD CLARK, *

*

Petitioner

, *

* Filed: April 26, 2013

v. *

* Attorney Fees and Costs

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *

HUMAN SERVICES *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

DECISION 1 (ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS)

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 2 I issued a

decision on September 26, 2012 . On April 25, 2013, Petitioner ’ s counsel filed a Stipulation of

Attorneys ’ Fees and Costs . The parties ’ s tipulation request s a total payment of $ 21,000.00

, representing all attorney’s fees and costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e). In accordance

with General Order #9, the s tipula tion includes a statement that P etitioner incurred no

reim bursable costs in pursuit of his claim.

I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis

for the claim. Therefore, an award fo r fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

300aa

- 15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate.

Accordingly, I hereby award the total $ 21,000.00 , as a lump sum in the form of a check

1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance

with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44

U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request

redaction “of any information furnished by that party (1) that is trade secret or commercial or financial information

and is privileged or confidential, or (2) that are medic al files and similar files the disclosure of which would

constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, “the entire” decision will be

available to the public. Id.

2 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 10 et seq . (2006).payable jointly to Petit ioner and Petitioner ’ s counsel, Isaiah Kalinowski, forwarded to the

main office of Maglio, Christopher, & Toale, located at 1605 Main Street, Suite 710,

Sarasota, Florid a 34236.

In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of the

Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in

accordance herewith.

IT I S SO ORDERED

/s/ George L. Hastings, Jr.

George L. Hastings, Jr.

Special Master
# Official Journal L 267/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 267 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6018 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 267

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6018 October 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1896 of 17 October 2017 concerning the authorisation of a preparation o endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase (EC 3.2.1.6) and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8) produced by Aspergillus niger (NRRL 25541) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, laying hens, pigs for fattening, minor poultry species and minor porcine species for fattening and amending Regulation (EC) No 255/2005 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 668/2003 (holder of the authorisation Andrés Pintaluba S.A.) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1896 of 17 October 2017 concerning the authorisation of a preparation o endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase (EC 3.2.1.6) and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8) produced by Aspergillus niger (NRRL 25541) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, laying hens, pigs for fattening, minor poultry species and minor porcine species for fattening and amending Regulation (EC) No 255/2005 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 668/2003 (holder of the authorisation Andrés Pintaluba S.A.) (
  1
  )

Aspergillus niger

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1161 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1161

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
       To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize 
appropriations for refugee and entrant assistance for fiscal years 1998 
                               and 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR REFUGEE AND ENTRANT 
              ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 414(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1524(a)) is amended by 
striking ``fiscal year 1995, fiscal year 1996, and fiscal year 1997'' 
and inserting ``each of fiscal years 1998 and 1999''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect October 1, 1997.

            Passed the Senate September 10, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1161

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

       To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize 
appropriations for refugee and entrant assistance for fiscal years 1998 
                               and 1999.
```
# C_2019337EN.01001701.xml

| 7.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/17

---

Action brought on 8 August 2019 – Perfect Bar v EUIPO (PERFECT BAR)

(Case T-553/19)

(2019/C 337/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Perfect Bar LLC (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: F. Miazzetto, J. Gracia Albero, R. Seoane Lacayo and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PERFECT BAR – Application for registration No 15 374 085

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2019 in Case R 371/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs derived from the procedure before the General Court and the EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs derived from the procedure before the General Court and the EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Art 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 296 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Art 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 296 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| — | Infringement of Art 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Art 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Art 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Art 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Art 7(1)(b) of Regulation EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Art 7(1)(b) of Regulation EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---