alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 250/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.250.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 250 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5426 August 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.250.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 250

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5426 August 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 250/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2011 to 30 June 2011(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2011/C 250/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2011 to 30 June 2011(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 18 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 250/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2011 to 30 June 2011(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2011/C 250/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2011 to 30 June 2011(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

18

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Marie Michelle ANDAYA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-71423.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 3, 2011.

Filed July 7, 2011.

Nancy Ellen Miller, Esquire, Reeves & Associates, APLC, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner.

Timothy Hayes, Ann Carroll Varnon, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and COGAN, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Brian M. Cogan, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Marie Michele Andaya, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of an order denying asylum and withholding of removal. The petition is denied.

An immigration judge (IJ) concluded that her application for asylum was time barred. The one-year bar faced by an asylum applicant and the bar’s exception for “extraordinary circumstances” involve mixed questions of law and fact, renewable by this court when the facts, as here, are undisputed. *Husyev v. Mukasey,*528 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir.2008); *see also*8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2), 8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5). Andaya has failed to meet her burden of demonstrating extraordinary circumstances that justify the almost two-year period between losing her legal immigration status and applying for asylum. *See*8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5).

In addressing Andaya’s request for withholding of removal, the IJ found that none of the past incidents faced by Andaya rose to the level of persecution and Anda-ya had not established that it was more likely than not that she would be persecuted upon her return to the Philippines. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16. Substantial evidence does not compel a contrary result. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel DeFreitas, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 816] —

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, an opinion and order of this Court dated August 14, 1995 *(People v DeFreitas,*213 AD2d 96 [1995]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 9, 1992.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1016 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1016

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in New 
                    Jersey, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 6 of Public Law 100-515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``$1,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$4,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``five'' and inserting 
        ``10''.

            Passed the Senate October 2, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1016

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in New 
                    Jersey, and for other purposes.
```
#### In the Matter of Isidore Karten et al., Appellants, v Elizabeth Squillace et al., Constituting the Board of Appeals of the Town of Clarkstown, Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Isidore Karten et al., Appellants, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Clarkstown et al., Respondents. Association for Sensible Zoning of Valley Cottage, Intervenor-Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)

In consolidated proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Clarkstown which, after a hearing, denied petitioners’ application for a zoning variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Slifkin, J.), entered April 30, 1984, which dismissed the petitions.

Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents and intervenor-respondent appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

*720The Board’s determination that the application was for a use variance and was not to continue a preexisting nonconforming use was supported by substantial evidence, as was its conclusion that petitioners failed to demonstrate unnecessary hardship.

Petitioners’ remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.
# L_2013223EN.01S00301.xml

| 21.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 223/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 223/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 31

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew J. Cederoth, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
    containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
    included in the year covered by this annual report of Navistar Financial
    Dealer Note Master Trust;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
    does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
    material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
    the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
    be provided to the trustee by the Servicer under the pooling and servicing
    agreement, for inclusion in these reports, is included in these reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
    the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with
    the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in
    the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
    agreement; and

5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer's
    compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
    provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
    compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
    or similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
    that is included in these reports.

6.  In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
    provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Master Trust Trustee.


By: /s/ANDREW J. CEDEROTH
Andrew J. Cederoth
Vice President and Treasurer
Navistar Financial Corporation
January 31, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 149 (Friday, August 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 43241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 23, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. The Beth S. Schnell Revocable Trust, Beth S. Schnell, as 
trustee, both of Orono, Minnesota; as a member of the Sparboe family 
shareholder group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares 
of CNB Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly retain voting 
shares of Center National Bank, both of Litchfield, Minnesota.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The Steven C. Bell 2021 Investment Trust, Wisconsin Rapids, 
Wisconsin; Paula Bell, individually and as trustee of the Steven C. 
Bell 2021 Investment Trust, Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin; and the Linda 
J. Growney Investment Trust, Madison, Wisconsin, Chad Kane, as trustee, 
Wausau, Wisconsin; to join the Bell Family Control Group, a group 
acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of WoodTrust Financial 
Corporation and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of WoodTrust 
Bank, both of Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 3, 
2021.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-16820 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:* National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Role of FSH.

*Date:* August 30, 2021.

*Time:* 12:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

*Agenda:* To review and evaluate grant applications.

*Place:* National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).

*Contact Person:* Nijaguna Prasad, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9667, *nijaguna.prasad@nih.gov*.

*Name of Committee:* National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Frontotemporal Dementia: Genes, Images, and Emotions.

*Date:* September 2, 2021.

*Time:* 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

*Agenda:* To review and evaluate grant applications.

*Place:* National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).

*Contact Person:* Rajasri Roy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6477, *rajasri.roy@nih.gov*.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 29, 2021. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-16538 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION CONCERNING COMPLIANCE


AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2004, NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(THE "COMPANY") HAS COMPLIED, IN ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS, WITH THE COMPANY'S
ESTABLISHED MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS FOR THE NAVISTAR FINANCIAL DEALER NOTE
MASTER TRUST ("TRUST"), AS DESCRIBED IN THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT FOR
THE TRUST DATED JUNE 8, 1995 AND INCLUDED IN THE ACCOMPANYING APPENDIX I.





January 31, 2005


By: /s/ PAMELA TURBEVILLE
    ------------------------------
Pamela Turbeville
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive and Operations Officer and Director and Authorized
Signatory for Navistar Financial Corporation)



By: /s/ ANDREW J. CEDEROTH
    ------------------------------
Andrew J. Cederoth
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Director and Authorized Signatory for Navistar
Financial Corporation)
<PAGE>
                                                                      APPENDIX I


MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS OF NAVISTAR FINANCIAL DEALER NOTE MASTER TRUST THE
SERVICER WILL:

      1.    Service and administer the Dealer Notes and collect payments in
            accordance with its customary and usual servicing procedures.

      2.    Maintain sufficient insurance on the vehicles.

      3.    Maintain the original Dealer Note.

      4.    Clearly identify each Dealer Note transferred to the Trust in its
            computer records.

      5.    Deposit collections into the Collections Account as defined by the
            agreement.

      6.    Establish appropriate accounts for the administration of the
            servicing agreement and maintain adequate records of those accounts.

      7.    Direct the Trust Trustee to invest account deposits maintained
            overnight or longer only on eligible investments.

      8.    Apply and allocate collections and other amounts between investor
            classes, Seller and Servicer.

      9.    Prepare and deliver, as prescribed by the agreement, the monthly
            serving and settlement statement when due.

      10.   Determine and provide notice to the appropriate parties regarding
            accumulation periods, as appropriate.

      11.   Determine and provide notice to the appropriate parties of any
            Servicer defaults or breach of Seller covenants.

      12.   Under specified conditions indemnify the Trust or Trust Trustee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE 
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AS SET FORTH IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,271
<INVENTORY>                                     93,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,116
<PP&E>                                         312,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                 179,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 521,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,257
<BONDS>                                         85,107
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                     285,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   521,405
<SALES>                                        330,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               330,590
<CGS>                                          222,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  222,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,565
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### Catalina K. Meyer, Respondent, v George Terasaki, Appellant.

—Order, Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered on July 17, 1985, unanimously reversed, without costs and without disbursements, summary judgment to respondent tenant is granted, and petitioner’s motion for said relief is denied for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Jawn Sandifer, J., at Appellate Term. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Fein, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randal W. HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant, and Department of Arizona Revenue, Defendant.

No. 10-15644.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed July 7, 2011.

John A. Nolet, Robert William Metzler, Supervisory, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Amy Matchison, Caroline A. Newman, Trial, USDOJ-United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Randal William Howard, Tucson, AZ, pro se.

*263Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Randal W. Howard appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for the government in its action to reduce to judgment unpaid tax assessments and foreclose on federal tax liens on Howard’s property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Hughes v. United States,*953 F.2d 531, 541 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Howard failed to controvert the government’s Certificates of Assessments and Payments demonstrating that the assessments were properly made. *See id.*at 540 (Certificates of Assessments and Payments are “probative evidence in and of themselves and, in the absence of contrary evidence, are sufficient to establish that ... assessments were properly made.”). Accordingly, the district court properly concluded that Howard’s property could be sold to satisfy his tax debt. *See*26 U.S.C. §§ 7402(a), 7403(a).

Howard’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.