alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of DeRigo S.p.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company (the“Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                     /s/  Ennio De Rigo  Dated:  June ..., 2005 Name:  Ennio De Rigo   Title:  Chief Executive Officer                                                   /s/  Maurizio Dessolis  Dated:  June ..., 2005 Name:  Maurizio Dessolis   Title:  Chief Financial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DeRigo S.p.A. and will be retained by De Rigo S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
77
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                         TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                             HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.

     HomeSide Lending,  Inc.,  pursuant to Section  607.1006,  Florida Statutes,
hereby files the following Articles of Amendment:

     1. The name of the  Corporation is HomeSide  Lending,  Inc. The corporation
was assigned document number J33658.

     2. Article III of the Articles of Incorporation of HomeSide  Lending,  Inc.
is hereby amended to read as follows:

                                   ARTICLE III

                                  Capital Stock

         The maximum number of shares of capital stock which this corporation is
         authorized  to have  outstanding  at any one  time  is  10,100  shares,
         $100.00 per share par value.

     3. The foregoing amendment was approved and adopted by the sole shareholder
of the  Corporation  on March 7, 2000.  No action by the Board of Directors  was
required pursuant to Section 1003(6), Florida Statutes.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has executed  these Articles of
Amendment as of the 7TH day of March, 2000.

                             HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.

                             By:  /s/______________________________
                                      Robert J. Jacobs
                                      Executive Vice  President, Secretary
                                      and General Counsel

Prepared by G. Alan Howard, Esq.

50 N. Laura Street, Suite 2750

Jacksonville, Florida  32202

(904) 798-3700

Fla. Bar No.  629091
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 11

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings
per share:

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                       Three months ended September 30,           Nine months ended September 30,
                                                           2002               2001                    2002              2001
                                                       ------------         -----------           ------------       -----------
<S>                                                    <C>                  <C>                   <C>                <C>
Numerator:
Net Income (loss)                                          (759,819)         (1,343,195)              (792,855)       (4,333,951)
Dividends on Series A preferred stock                          (780)               (780)                (2,315)           (2,315)
Dividends on Series B preferred stock                       (85,321)            (52,175)              (186,036)         (155,564)
                                                       ------------         -----------           ------------       -----------
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share-income (loss) available to common shareholders       (845,920)         (1,396,150)              (981,206)       (4,491,830)
                                                       ------------         -----------           ------------       -----------
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share-
weighted average shares outstanding                      10,519,907           9,326,558             10,300,395         9,172,060
Effect of dilutive securities                             1,405,000                                  1,405,000
Warrants                                                    952,784                  --                952,784                --
                                                       ------------         -----------           ------------       -----------
Dilutive potential common shares denominator
for diluted earnings (loss) per share adjusted
weighted-average shares and assumed conversion           12,877,691           9,326,558             12,658,179         9,172,060
                                                       ------------         -----------           ------------       -----------
Basic earnings (loss) per share                               (0.08)              (0.15)                 (0.10)            (0.49)
                                                       ------------         -----------           ------------       -----------
Diluted earnings (loss) per share                             (0.08)              (0.15)                 (0.10)            (0.49)
                                                       ------------         -----------           ------------       -----------
</Table>
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company for the periods presented therein.
  /s/ ANDREW HAMERAndrew HamerVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3299

___________________________

Andrew J. Maxey

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

v.

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: September 18, 2017

 Filed: April 20, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, Chief Judge, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

In 2003, Andrew J. Maxey pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a

firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Based on his prior Missouri convictions for four

counts of second-degree burglary and seven counts of second-degree attempted
robbery, the district court found that Maxey qualified for an enhancement under the

1

Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”). See id. § 924(e). The court then sentenced

Maxey to the resulting mandatory minimum of 180 months’ imprisonment. 

Nearly thirteen years later, Maxey filed a motion to correct his sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming that his robbery and burglary convictions no

longer qualify as ACCA predicate offenses in light of the Supreme Court’s decision

in Johnson v. United States. See 135 S. Ct. 2551, 2557 (2015) (invalidating the

ACCA’s residual clause as unconstitutionally vague). The district court denied this

motion, holding that both second-degree burglary and second-degree attempted

robbery remain violent felonies under the force clause of the ACCA. On appeal, the

Government concedes that Maxey’s burglary convictions no longer qualify as

predicate offenses in light of both Johnson and Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct.

2243, 2251 (2016) (holding that Iowa’s burglary offense did not qualify as violent

felony). Thus, the only issue before usis whether Missouri second-degree attempted

robbery still qualifies as a violent felony—a legal determination that we review de

novo. See United States v. Eastin, 445 F.3d 1019, 1021 (8th Cir. 2006). 

The en banc court resolved this precise question in United States v. Swopes. 

2018 WL 1525825, at *1 (8th Cir. Mar. 29, 2018) (en banc). Applying the force

clause of the ACCA, we held that Missouri second-degree robbery qualifies as a

violent felony. See id. at *1-3 (overruling United States v. Bell, 840 F.3d 963 (8th

Cir. 2016)). Thus, we conclude that Maxey is not entitled to relief, as his convictions

for attempted robbery are sufficient to qualify him as an armed career criminal

because this offense “has as an element the . . . attempted use . . . use of physical force

against the person of another.” See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). 

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

1

District of Missouri. 

-2-
Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Maxey’s § 2255 motion.

______________________________

-3-
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1120

AN ACT

To provide for a consultant for the President pro tempore.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 101(a) of the Supplemental Appropriations

4 Act, 1977 (2 U.S.C. 61h–6(a)) is amended by inserting

5 after the first sentence the following: ‘‘The President pro

6 tempore of the Senate is authorized to appoint and fix

7 the compensation of 1 consultant, on a temporary or inter8 mittent basis, at a daily rate of compensation not in excess

9 of that specified in the first sentence of this subsection.’’.

Passed the Senate July 31, 1997.

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1120

AN ACT

To provide for a consultant for the President pro

tempore.
#### Danielle Pecile et al., Appellants, v Titan Capital Group, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[947 NYS2d 66]

*544Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered on or about June 27, 2011, insofar as it granted the motions to dismiss the second and sixth causes of action only as they relate to defamation, and the eleventh cause of action for defamation, as against defendants Titan Capital Group LLC, Marc Abrams, and Russell Abrams, dismissed the complaint as against defendant Steve Shalicky, and dismissed the complaint as against defendants Epstein Becker & Green, EC., Ronald M. Green and Barry Aspen, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint was properly dismissed as against the law firm defendant Epstein Becker & Green, EC., and the individual attorney defendants, Ronald M. Green and Barry Aspen. It is well settled that attorneys are “immunized from liability under the shield afforded attorneys in advising their clients, even when such advice is erroneous, in the absence of fraud, collusion, malice or bad faith” *(Beatie v DeLong,*164 AD2d 104, 109 [1990]). To the extent the complaint alleges fraud, collusion, malice or bad faith on the part of the Epstein Becker defendants, the allegations are wholly conclusory and insufficient to state a claim. Indeed, the allegations in the complaint do not suggest that the Epstein Becker defendants “acted in any capacity other than as an attorney” *(Art Capital Group, LLC v Neuhaus,*70 AD3d 605, 607 [2010]). Nor did the allegations concerning the retaliation claims sufficiently allege that the Epstein Becker defendants actually participated in the improper conduct relating to the claims of sexual harassment and employment discrimination *(see Frank v Lawrence Union Free School Dist.,*688 F Supp 2d 160, 174 [ED NY 2010]).

The defamation claim and those claims related to it (second and sixth causes of action) were also properly dismissed since the alleged defamatory statement contained nonactionable opinion and/or loose, hyperbolic language *(Mann v Abel,*10 NY3d 271, 276 [2008], *cert denied*555 US 1170 [2009]). The statement, made to the media, that plaintiffs’ suit was without merit constituted mere opinion, and was therefore nonactionable (E*l-Amine v Avon Prods.,*293 AD2d 283, 283-284 [2002]). The use of the term “shakedown” in the statement did not “convey the specificity that would suggest” that the Titan defendants “were seriously accusing [plaintiffs] of committing the crime of extortion” *(McNamee v Clemens,*762 F Supp 2d 584, 604 [ED NY 2011]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining claims and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Manzanet*545Daniels and Román, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 31943(U).]
# Official Journal C 307/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 307 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6316 September 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 307

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6316 September 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 307/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9908 – Bonduelle/Unibel/Sparkling Partners/Végéhub/Yumi) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 307/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9908 – Bonduelle/Unibel/Sparkling Partners/Végéhub/Yumi) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 307/02 | Euro exchange rates — 15 September 2020 | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2020/C 307/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 307/02

Euro exchange rates — 15 September 2020

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2020/C 307/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 307/04 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 4 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 307/04

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            17,153
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         146
<MORTGAGE>                                         204
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  22,335
<CASH>                                              57
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 564
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,516
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  5,841
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 43
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  17,121
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           93,725
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              250<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,516
<PREMIUMS>                                         934
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                401
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                         755
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        124
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    157
<INCOME-TAX>                                        51
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS COMPANY OBLIGATION MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED SECURITIES OF
SUBSIDIARY TRUST HOLDING SOLELY JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Tim Paterson-Brown, Chief Executive Officer of MGTCapital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)    the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008, and 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)    the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|               | By:                     | /s/ TIM PATERSON-BROWN |
|--------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|
|               | Tim Paterson-Brown      |
|               | Chief Executive Officer |
|               |                    |                   |
| April 2, 2009 |                    |                   |
|                    |                         |                        |  |

 

E-4

----
Exhibit
      32.2








**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of IBSG International, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey Birch, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
                  May 11, 2006
              By:
              /s/ Geoffrey
                BirchGeoffrey
                BirchPrincipal
                Accounting Officer
# Official Journal L 128/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 128 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4916 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 128

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4916 May 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2006 of 15 May 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 730/2006 of 11 May 2006 on airspace classification and access of flights operated under visual flight rules above flight level 195 (1) | 3 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 731/2006 of 15 May 2006 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 May 2006 | 5 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 732/2006 of 15 May 2006 amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1011/2005 for the 2005/2006 marketing year | 8 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2006 of 15 May 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 730/2006 of 11 May 2006 on airspace classification and access of flights operated under visual flight rules above flight level 195 (1)

3

Commission Regulation (EC) No 731/2006 of 15 May 2006 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 May 2006

5

Commission Regulation (EC) No 732/2006 of 15 May 2006 amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1011/2005 for the 2005/2006 marketing year

8

| | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 15 May 2006 concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Germany and repealing Decision 2006/274/EC
  (notified under document number C(2006) 1945)

   (1) | 10 |

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 15 May 2006 concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Germany and repealing Decision 2006/274/EC
  (notified under document number C(2006) 1945)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2006) 1945)

10

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.