alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 23 

To prohibit unauthorized earmarks. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

To prohibit unauthorized earmarks. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON UNAUTHORIZED EARMARKS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be in order to consider 

4 a bill, joint resolution, conference report, or amendment 

5 that provides an earmark. 

6 (b) SUPERMAJORITY.— 

7 (1) WAIVER.—The provisions of subsection (a) 

8 may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by 

9 the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the Members, 

10 duly chosen and sworn. 

11 (2) APPEAL.—Appeals in the Senate from the 

12 decisions of the Chair relating to any provision of 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 23 IS 

1 this section shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally 

2 divided between, and controlled by, the appellant 

3 and the manager of the measure. An affirmative 

4 vote of three-fourths of the Members of the Senate, 

5 duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain 

6 an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of 

7 order raised under this section. 

8 (c) EARMARK DEFINED.—In this resolution, the term 

9 ‘‘earmark’’ means a provision or report language included 

10 primarily at the request of a Senator or Member of the 

11 House of Representatives providing or recommending a 

12 specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit 

13 authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan, 

14 loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, or other expenditure 

15 with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific State, local16 ity, or congressional district unless the provision or lan17 guage— 

18 (1) is specifically authorized by an appropriate 

19 congressional authorizing committee of jurisdiction; 

20 (2) meets funding eligibility criteria established 

21 by an appropriate congressional authorizing com22 mittee of jurisdiction by statute; or 

23 (3) is awarded through a statutory or adminis24 trative formula-driven or competitive award process. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Pen
         Interconnect,  Inc.  September  30, 1999  financial  statements  and is
         qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                       0001000266
<NAME>                                      Pen Interconnect, Inc.

<CURRENCY>                                  U.S.




<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999


<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1.00

<CASH>                                                        177,214
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 5,174,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  (1,890,576)
<INVENTORY>                                                   4,250,661
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              7,842,531
<PP&E>                                                        1,913,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (376,681)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                9,529,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         11,040,472
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   28
<COMMON>                                                      96,381
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (1,906,537)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  9,529,395
<SALES>                                                       17,651,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              17,651,838
<CGS>                                                         16,668,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 10,216,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              1,501,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            678,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (11,413,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  601,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (12,014,791)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (12,014,791)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (1.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (1.82)



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ELKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-11216

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2011.

Judy K. Hunt, Robert E. O’Neill, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Douglas Molloy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Ft. Myers, FL, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

David Elkins, St. Petersburg, FL, pro se.

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

David Elkins appeals *pro se*the denial of his postjudgment motions challenging the special condition of his probation that requires mental health treatment. We affirm.

Elkins pleaded guilty to assaulting two agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration. Psychologist Joanna Mulder diagnosed Elkins with delusional disorder and intermittent explosive disorder, and the district court imposed a sentence of probation with a special condition that Elkins “participate as directed in a program of mental health treatment ... approved by [his] Probation Officer.” Elkins’s probation officer scheduled a meeting with El-kins after he requested information about whether the Administration was following him in an airplane. When Elkins failed to report to the meeting, his probation officer moved to revoke his probation. At a revocation hearing, Elkins admitted that he had violated a term of his probation. The district court reinstated Elkins’s sentence of probation with the same special condition regarding mental health treatment.

Elkins filed two motions challenging the special condition of his probation. Elkins moved for an injunction to “protect[ ] him against further demands and requests” of his probation officer “for additional psychological evaluations.” In an affidavit attached to the motion, Elkins alleged that additional mental examinations would vio*424late his rights under the “[F]irst, [F]ourth, and [Fjifth” Amendments and he challenged Mulder’s diagnosis. Elkins also moved the district court, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3), to reconsider the special condition of probation. Elkins argued that the government had perpetrated a “fraud upon the court” because he had been maliciously prosecuted by the government and had been misdiagnosed by Mulder.

The district court correctly rejected El-kins’s motions. Elkins failed to challenge the special condition by appealing either his sentence of probation or the reinstatement of his sentence following his revocation hearing. *See*18 U.S.C. §§ 3562(b), 3742; Fed. R.App. P. 4(b). Elkins could not move the district court to reconsider his special condition of probation because “Rule 60(b) simply does not provide for relief from judgment in a criminal case,” *United States v. Mosavi,*138 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir.1998).

We AFFIRM the order that denied El-kins’s postjudgment motions.
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of IBSG International, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Geoffrey Birch, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
  IBSG
                  INTERNATIONAL, INC.Date: June
                  13, 2006
              By:
              /s/ Geoffrey
                  BirchGeoffrey
                  BirchPrincipal
                  Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Soil Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl P.
Ranno, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Carl P. Ranno
-----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2009
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:2559
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:2560
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:2561
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:2562
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:2563
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:2564
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:2565
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:2566
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:2567
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:2568
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:2569
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:2570
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:2571
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 287 Filed: 03/16/05 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:2572
Exhibit 10.39



2005 Director Compensation



Each non-employee Director earns:



| |  |  | a $12,000 annual fee; and
| | - |  | -------------------------



| |  |  | a $2,500 fee for attendance at each regular and special meeting of the Board; or
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a $1,000 fee for each regular and special meeting of the Board, if such Director attends such meeting by conference call.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The chairman of the Audit Committee earns an annual fee of $25,000, the
chairman of the Compensation Committee earns an annual fee of $10,000 and the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee earns an annual fee of $5,000. Non-employee Directors who serve as committee members earn an additional fee
of $1,000 per meeting, which is not paid, at the discretion of the chairman of such committee, for brief telephone meetings. Employee Directors do not receive any compensation in their capacities as Directors.



On the day of each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each non-employee Director
is granted an option to purchase the number of shares of common stock equal to $130,000 divided by the average of the high and low prices per share of the Companys common stock on the day of each Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Order entered December 2 3 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00651 - CV ANDREW WHITE AND CHE LSEA BALESTRA, Appellant s V. NHI - REIT OF AXEL, LL C, Appellee On A ppeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 18 - 07841



### O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ counsel’s December 18, 2019 motion to withdraw. We GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to remove the law firm of Reed Smith, LLP and its attorneys as counsel for appellants. All future communications with appellants should be directed to Andrew White 1113 Lake Whitney Drive Wylie, Texas 75098 ( 917) 825

- 1308 and Chelsea Balestra 2425 Victory Ave. Dallas, Texas 7 5219 (972) 754

- 3009.We note that in the motion to withdraw, counsel informs us that White has filed for

bankruptcy. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.2, further action in this cause is automatically suspended

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 8.2. Ac cordingly, for administrative purposes, this cause is ABATED and treated as a closed case. It may be reinstated on motion by any party showing, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 8.3, that the appeal is permitted by federal law or the bankrupt cy court. See id. 8.3.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1


            CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                          OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, the undersigned Jack (J.D.) Draper, President and Chief Executive
Officer of FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

     1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended
          December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: October 21, 2005              /s/ Jack (J.D.) Draper
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Jack (J.D.) Draper
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
                                     Principal Executive Officer


                                       1
#### In the Matter of Alyssa G. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Miguel P., Appellant. (Proceed*996ing No. 1.) In the Matter of Emelie G. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Miguel P., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[942 NYS2d 363]

In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (McGowan, J.), dated April 20, 2011, as, without an evidentiary dispositional hearing, released the subject children to the mother and directed him to complete a sex offender program, (2) from an order of protection of the same court, also dated April 20, 2011, which, inter alia, directed him to stay away from the child Alyssa G. for a period of one year, and (3) from an order of protection of the same court, also dated April 20, 2011, which, inter alia, directed him to stay away from the child Emelie G. until she reaches the age of 18.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the orders of protection are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The father’s contention that the Family Court erred in failing to conduct a full dispositional hearing is unpreserved for appellate review, as he did not object when the Family Court informed him that the matter would proceed to disposition, he did not request a full hearing, and he participated without objection in the informal dispositional proceeding conducted by that court *(see Matter of Royce K.,*64 AD3d 779, 780 [2009]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, A.EJ., Hall, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 280E/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 280E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 514 November 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 280E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 514 November 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2008/C 280E/01 | Common Position (EC) No 26/2008 of 2 October 2008 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2008/C 280E/01

Common Position (EC) No 26/2008 of 2 October 2008 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2008/C 280E/02 | Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2008/C 280E/02

Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         187,886
<SECURITIES>                                    58,752
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (902)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               274,740
<PP&E>                                          12,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 305,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           533
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   305,693
<SALES>                                         29,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,062
<CGS>                                            5,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,740
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,422)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,318
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

Lufax Holding Ltd - Ordinary Shares 

(Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands) 
  

			
	Certificate No.	  	Shares

 Share capital is US$100,000 divided into 

10,000,000,000 Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.00001 each 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT                      

is the registered holder of                     

 Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and articles of association thereof. 

 

			
	EXECUTED for and on behalf of the Company on	  	by:                        

  

							
		 	Director
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 3 Filed: 01/11/02 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:9
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 3 Filed: 01/11/02 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:10
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 3 Filed: 01/11/02 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:11
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 3 Filed: 01/11/02 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:12
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 3 Filed: 01/11/02 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:13
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 3 Filed: 01/11/02 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:14
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 3 Filed: 01/11/02 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:15
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 3 Filed: 01/11/02 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:16