[Cite as Adoption Link, Inc. v. Suver, 112 Ohio St.3d 166, 2006-Ohio-6528.]

ADOPTION LINK, INC., APPELLANT, v. SUVER, DIR., APPELLEE. 

[Cite as Adoption Link, Inc. v. Suver, 112 Ohio St.3d 166, 2006-Ohio-6528.]

Habeas corpus — Child custody — A juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction to 

determine custody of any child not a ward of another court — Parents 

may permanently surrender a child under six months of age to a childplacing agency if they have custody of the child — Judgment affirmed. 

(No. 2006-1646 ─ Submitted November 29, 2006 ─ Decided 

December 27, 2006.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Greene County, 

No. 06-CA-81, 2006-Ohio-4438. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ 

of habeas corpus filed by a private child-placing agency to obtain custody of a 

child. Because the petition failed to state a viable habeas corpus claim, we affirm. 

{¶ 2} Kathy Jo Teegarden and Roy John Jones Jr. are the biological 

parents of T.J., who was born on December 30, 2005. Shortly after T.J.’s birth, 

the Clark County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, Juvenile 

Section placed the child in the temporary-shelter care of the Clark County 

Department of Job and Family Services. T.J. was placed in a foster home in Clark 

County, where he remains. The department successfully sought temporary 

custody of T.J. from the Clark County Juvenile Court. The juvenile court found 

that T.J. was a dependent child and that it was in the child’s best interest to 

commit the child to the custody of the department. The parents executed and filed 

in the Greene County Juvenile Court agreements permanently surrendering 

custody of T.J. to appellant, Adoption Link, Inc., a private child-placing agency 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

located in Greene County. The Greene County Juvenile Court approved the 

permanent-surrender agreements and granted permanent custody of T.J. to 

Adoption Link. 

{¶ 3} The Clark County Department of Job and Family Services filed a 

motion to vacate the permanent-surrender order. The Greene County Juvenile 

Court denied the department’s motion and ordered it to relinquish custody of T.J. 

to Adoption Link. 

{¶ 4} After the Clark County Department of Job and Family Services 

refused to relinquish custody of T.J., Adoption Link filed a petition in the Court 

of Appeals for Greene County. In its amended petition, Adoption Link requested 

a writ of habeas corpus to compel appellee, Robert Suver, the director of the 

department, to immediately transfer physical custody of T.J. from the department 

to Adoption Link. Although Adoption Link acknowledged that the Clark County 

Juvenile Court had awarded temporary custody of T.J. to the department, it did 

not attach a copy of this entry to its petition. Suver filed a brief in opposition, 

which the court of appeals treated as a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss for 

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The court of appeals 

granted Suver’s motion and dismissed the amended petition. 

{¶ 5} In its appeal as of right, Adoption Link asserts that the court of 

appeals erred in dismissing its habeas corpus petition. 

{¶ 6} “In order to prevail on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a 

child custody case, the petitioner must establish that (1) the child is being 

unlawfully detained, and (2) the petitioner has the superior legal right to custody 

of the child.” State ex rel. Bruggeman v. Auglaize Cty. Court of Common Pleas

(1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 257, 719 N.E.2d 543; see, also, In re Bailey, 98 Ohio St.3d 

309, 2003-Ohio-859, 784 N.E.2d 109, ¶ 11. 

{¶ 7} As the court of appeals correctly concluded, Adoption Link is 

unable to establish either of these requirements for the following reasons. 
January Term, 2006 

3 

{¶ 8} First, the Clark County Juvenile Court had exclusive original 

jurisdiction to “determine the custody of any child not a ward of another court of 

this state” and to “hear and determine requests for the extension of temporary 

custody agreements, and requests for court approval of permanent custody 

agreements, that are filed pursuant to section 5103.15 of the Revised Code.” R.C. 

2151.23(A)(2) and (9); see, also, In re Hockstok, 98 Ohio St.3d 238, 2002-Ohio7208, 781 N.E.2d 971, ¶ 15. Because the Clark County Juvenile Court granted 

legal custody of T.J. to the department and retained jurisdiction, T.J. became a 

ward of that court, and the Greene County Juvenile Court lacked jurisdiction to 

grant custody of T.J. to Adoption Link. See, e.g., In re Frenz, Tuscarawas App. 

Nos. 2003AP040027 and 2003AP030025, 2003-Ohio-3653, ¶ 23-24 (juvenile 

court lacked jurisdiction to determine motion for permanent custody in matter 

involving child who was the ward of another juvenile court by prior custody 

determination); see, also, Juv.R. 2(QQ), defining “[w]ard of court” as “a child 

over whom the court assumes continuing jurisdiction.” 

{¶ 9} Second, R.C. 5103.15(B)(2) does not permit parents of a child less 

than six months old who do not have legal custody of the child to enter into an 

agreement with a private child-placing agency surrendering the child to the 

permanent custody of that agency. To be sure, R.C. 5103.15(B)(2) provides, “The 

parents of a child less than six months of age may enter into an agreement with a 

private child placing agency surrendering the child into the permanent custody of 

the agency without juvenile court approval if the agreement is executed solely for 

the purpose of obtaining the adoption of the child.” But that provision must be 

read in context and be construed in pari materia with the other provisions of R.C. 

5103.15, which manifestly condition any such permanent-surrender agreement on 

the parents or other specified persons having custody of the child. See, e.g., R.C. 

5103.15(A)(1) (“The parents, guardian, or other persons having the custody of a 

child may enter into an agreement with any public children services agency or 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

4 

private child placing agency * * *” [emphasis added]); R.C. 5103.15(B)(1) 

(“Subject to, except as provided in division (B)(2) of this section, juvenile court 

approval, the parents, guardian, or other persons having custody of a child may 

enter into an agreement with a public children services agency or private child 

placing agency surrendering the child into the permanent custody of the agency” 

[emphasis added]). When the parents attempted to permanently surrender their 

rights to T.J. to Adoption Link, they lacked authority to do so because the 

department had legal custody of the child. 

{¶ 10} Finally, Adoption Link did not attach all of the pertinent entries 

concerning the custody of T.J. to its habeas corpus petition and therefore did not 

comply with the pleading requirements of R.C. 2725.04(D), which are applicable 

to child-custody habeas corpus actions. See Holloway v. Clermont Cty. Dept. of 

Human Servs. (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 128, 132, 684 N.E.2d 1217. Adoption Link 

did not attach any of the Clark County Juvenile Court orders granting custody of 

T.J. to the department to either its petition or its amended petition. 

{¶ 11} Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals properly determined 

that Adoption Link’s amended petition failed to state a claim upon which relief 

could be granted and that it should be dismissed. Accordingly, we affirm the 

judgment of the court of appeals.1

Judgment affirmed. 

 MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Voorhees & Levy, L.L.C., and Michael R. Voorhees, for appellant. 

 

1

 We deny Adoption Link’s request for oral argument. The parties’ briefs are sufficient to resolve 

this appeal. See, e.g., State ex rel. Brown v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections, 109 Ohio St.3d 63, 2006-

Ohio-1292, 846 N.E.2d 8, ¶ 38, fn. 1. 
January Term, 2006 

5 

 Stephen A. Schumaker, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Roger A. 

Ward, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 

______________________