Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 4, 2021 / Notices 41949 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to 

Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 39531 (July 

1, 2020). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

54983 September 3, 2020 (Initiation Notice). 

3See Memorandum ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 

(PET) Film, Sheet and Strip from India: Extension 

of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review—2019–2020,’’ dated 

March 30, 2021. 

4See Memorandum ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 

(PET) Film, Sheet and Strip from India: Extension 

of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review—2019–2020,’’ dated 

June 17, 2021. 

5See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Film, Sheet 

and Strip from India, 67 FR 44176 (July 1, 2002) 

(Order). 

6See Initiation Notice. As noted above, SRF Ltd. 

is the same company as SRF Limited of India. 

7SRF Limited and SRF Limited of India are the 

same company. See SRF’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene 

Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet and Strip from 

India/SRF Limited/Comments on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) Data Release,’’ dated 

November 30, 2020. SRF states that ‘‘{t}here is only 

one SRF producing the subject merchandise . . . 

SRF Limited.’’ For purposes of this review, when 

we refer to SRF Limited, we will use the formal 

name, SRF Limited of India. 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule 

Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to 

COVID–19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020) 

(‘‘To provide adequate time for release of case briefs 

via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date 

for all rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs 

are filed (while these modifications remain in 

effect)’’); and Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–824] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From India: 

Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 

and strip (PET film) from India. The 

period of review (POR) is July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020. This review 

covers Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (Jindal) 

and SRF Limited of India (SRF), 

producers and exporters of PET film 

from India. Commerce preliminarily 

determines that Jindal and SRF did not 

make sales of subject merchandise 

below normal value during the POR. We 

invite interested parties to comment on 

these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable August 4, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacqueline Arrowsmith at (202) 482– 

5255; AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2020, Commerce published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on PET film from India, for the period 

July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020.1

Subsequently, on September 3, 2020, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.222(c)(1)(i), Commerce published a 

notice of initiation of an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on PET film from India.2

On March 30, 2021, in accordance 

with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 

19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce 

extended the due date for the 

preliminary results by 60 days (from 

April 2, 2021 to July 1, 2021).3 On June 

17, 2021, we extended the deadline by 

an additional 28 days.4 The current 

deadline is July 29, 2021. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of topics 

included in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. 

Scope of the Order 5

The products covered by this Order 

are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or 

primed polyethylene terephthalate film, 

sheet, and strip, whether extruded or 

coextruded. Excluded are metallized 

films and other finished films that have 

had at least one of their surfaces 

modified by the application of a 

performance-enhancing resinous or 

inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 

inches thick. Imports of PET film are 

classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

under item number 3920.62.00.90. 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes. The 

written description of the scope of the 

Order is dispositive. 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Commerce initiated a review of eight 

separate companies in this proceeding.6

We are rescinding this administrative 

review with respect to six of these 

companies: (1) Ester Industries Ltd. 

(Ester); (2) Garware Polyester Ltd. 

(Garware); (3) MTZ Polyesters Ltd. 

(MTZ); (4) Polyplex Corporation 

(Polyplex); (5) Uflex Ltd. (Uflex); and (6) 

Vacmet India Ltd. (Vacmet), pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), because all 

review requests of these companies 

were timely withdrawn. Accordingly, 

the companies that remain subject to the 

instant review are Jindal Poly Films Ltd. 

(Jindal) and SRF Limited of India 

(SRF).7

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of 

the Act. Export price is calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine the following 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the period July 1, 2019, through June 30, 

2020. 

Manufacturer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

Jindal Poly Films Ltd. ................. 0.00 

SRF Limited of India ................... 0.00 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after public 

announcement of the preliminary 

results in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c), interested parties may 

submit case briefs not later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed 

not later than seven days after the date 

for filing case briefs.8 Parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding are encouraged to 

submit with each argument: (1) A 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
41950 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 4, 2021 / Notices 

9See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements). 

10Where Commerce has calculated export 

subsidies in a companion countervailing duty order 

administrative review, we have made an adjustment 

based on the most recently completed review. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film Sheet and Strip 

from India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2017, 85 FR 14463 (March 

12, 2020). 

11See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 12Order. 

1See Utility Scale Wind Towers from Malaysia: 

Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination, 86 FR 30593 (June 9, 2021). 

2See ITC Letter, ‘‘Notification of ITC Final 

Determinations,’’ dated July 26, 2021. 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.9

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, must submit a written request 

to the Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 

30 days after the date of publication of 

this notice. Requests should contain: (1) 

The party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case briefs. Commerce 

intends to issue the final results of this 

administrative review, including the 

results of its analysis of the issues raised 

in any written briefs, not later than 120 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice, unless extended, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of this 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and U.S. CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) 

in the final results of this review, we 

will calculate importer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rates on the basis of 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for an importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of those 

same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).10 Where an importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of the review, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.11

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 35 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this administrative review in 

the Federal Register. If a timely 

summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 

International Trade, the assessment 

instructions will direct CBP not to 

liquidate relevant entries until the time 

for parties to file a request for a statutory 

injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 

days of publication.) 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of 

PET film from India entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the company 

under review will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is zero or de 

minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required); (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters is 5.71 percent.12 These 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 29, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Comparisons to Normal Value 

VI. Date of Sale 

VII. Export Price 

VIII. Normal Value 

IX. Currency Conversion 

X. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–16620 Filed 8–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–557–822] 

Utility Scale Wind Towers From 

Malaysia: Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC), 

Commerce is issuing the countervailing 

duty order on utility scale wind towers 

(wind towers) from Malaysia. 

DATES: Applicable August 4, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nathan James or Kelsie Hohenberger, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5305 

and (202) 482–2517, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In accordance with section 705(d) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act), on June 9, 2021, Commerce 

published its affirmative final 

determination in the countervailing 

duty investigation of wind towers from 

Malaysia.1 On July 26, 2021, the ITC 

notified Commerce of its affirmative 

final determination that an industry in 

the United States is materially injured 

within the meaning of section 

705(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, by reason of 

subsidized imports of subject 

merchandise from Malaysia.2

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are wind towers from Malaysia. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the appendix to this notice. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1