alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlton Scott, Jr., Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), rendered April 18, 1984, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress statements.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur with the finding by the suppression court that defendant’s admissions were made in a noncustodial interrogation environment and, therefore, the police were not required to give defendant preinterrogation advice and warnings. Defendant voluntarily presented himself at the police station for questioning in response to a request by the police. Neither the fact that defendant was the focus of an investigation at the time he was questioned, nor the fact that the interrogation was conducted at a police station, necessarily renders the interrogation custodial *(see, Matter of Kwok T.,*43 NY2d 213; *People v Yukl,*25 NY2d 585, *mot to amend remittitur denied*26 NY2d 845, *cert denied*400 US 851; *People v Bertolo,*65 NY2d 111), particularly where, as here, the questioning was neither threatening nor coercive, and defendant was free to leave at any time. Moreover, at the conclusion of the interrogation, although defendant was informed that he would be arrested at the police station the next morning, he was permitted to return overnight to his home in New Jersey. Accordingly, there is sufficient evidence on the record to conclude that defendant’s admissions were voluntarily given under noncustodial circumstances *(see, People v Bertolo, supra).*Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Eiber and Hooper, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Fruit and Tree Nut Research: Byron, GA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Byron, Georgia Fruit and Tree Nut Research People & Locations







Kirby C Moncrief
                        Fruit and Tree Nut Research

                        




                        
                        Agricultural Science Research Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (478) 956-6411
                        
                        
                        Fax: (478) 956-2929(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 49 Filed: 12/06/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:384
(56 Misc. Rep. 121.)

#### GRANIERI v. NEW YORK SHOE REPAIRING CO.

(City Court of New York, Special Term.

October, 1907.)

Courts—City Court—Attachment—Domestic Corporations—Jurisdiction.

Code Civ. Proc. § 636, providing for the issuance of an attachment against a domestic corporation, under section 3160, does not apply to the City Court

. _ Action by Michael Granieri against the New York Shoe Repairing Company. Motion to vacate attachment. Granted.

Catts & Catts, for the motion.

Samuel H. Golding, opposed.

O’DWYER, C. J.

Section 3169, Code Civ. Proc., grants jurisdiction to the City Court in a proper case to issue a warrant of attachment against property in an action wherein the defendant is a foreign corporation or a natural person, and not otherwise. Section 636, Code Civ. Proc., provides for the issuance of an attachment against a domestic corporation, but that section of the Code does not apply to the City Court. Code Civ. Proc. § 3160. Motion to vacate attachment granted, with $10 costs.

Motion granted, with $10 costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) 12/31/98
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         166,107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,993)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               276,045
<PP&E>                                         153,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                (38,739)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 632,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,776
<BONDS>                                        577,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,088
<OTHER-SE>                                    (53,909)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   632,951
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,661
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,551)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,551)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1183 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1183

  To repeal the provision crediting increased excise taxes on certain 
tobacco products against payments made pursuant to the tobacco industry 
                        settlement legislation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 1997

  Mr. Durbin (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Bumpers, Mr. 
 DeWine, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. 
 Leahy, Mr. Reed, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Wellstone, and Mr. Wyden) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the provision crediting increased excise taxes on certain 
tobacco products against payments made pursuant to the tobacco industry 
                        settlement legislation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secret Tobacco Giveaway Repeal 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TOBACCO INDUSTRY SETTLEMENT CREDIT.

    Subsection (k) of section 9302 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, 
as added by section 1604(f)(3) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, is 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 163/22 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 163 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4722 June 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 163

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4722 June 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 163/1 | Euro exchange rates |

Notice No

Contents

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 163/1

Euro exchange rates

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 163/2 | Corrigendum to the call for proposals for projects and supporting activities in the scope of the Preparatory action on the Enhancement of the European industrial potential in the field of security research — Activity: Security Research — Call identifier: PASR-2004 (OJ C 81, 31.3.2004) |

Corrigenda

2004/C 163/2

Corrigendum to the call for proposals for projects and supporting activities in the scope of the Preparatory action on the Enhancement of the European industrial potential in the field of security research — Activity: Security Research — Call identifier: PASR-2004 (OJ C 81, 31.3.2004)

(OJ C 81, 31.3.2004)

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of June 30, 1999, and statements of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         675,916
<SECURITIES>                                   137,648
<RECEIVABLES>                                  193,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    626,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,747,676
<PP&E>                                       2,153,035
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,507,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,627,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,263,085
<BONDS>                                         45,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          650,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,492
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,348,381)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,627,477
<SALES>                                      1,672,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,672,999
<CGS>                                        1,381,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,381,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,089,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,092,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,889,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,889,756)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,889,756)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 150 (Monday, August 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 43558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Mentored Clinical Scientist 
Research Career Development Award (Parent K08 Independent Clinical 
Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: August 31, 2021.
    Time: 3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F58, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mario Cerritelli, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F58, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5199, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#096a6c7b7b607d6c64496468606527676061276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ceadabbcbca7baaba38ea3afa7a2e0a0a7a6e0a9a1b8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 4, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-16904 Filed 8-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
  /s/ UMANG GUPTAUmang GuptaChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
inate Orda For, (06897)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

2)

Name of Assigned Jud Sitting Judge if Other
anor Magistrate Judge James B. Moran than Asshtved judge
CASE NUMBER 01 C 839 DATE 4/11/2002
CASE 3COM Corporation vs. Elizabeth Gilbert
TITLE

[In the following box (a) indicate the party filing the motion, «.g,, plaintif?, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the nature

of the motion being presented.]

ab

MOTION:
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DOCKET ENTRY:
(1) oO Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]
(2) Oo Brief in support of motion due
(3) oO Answer brief to motion due___. Reply to answer brief due
(4) oO Ruling/Hearingon____ssetfor___—sat.
(5) a Status hearing[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for]on__setfor___—_at.
(6) Qo Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for]on__—setfor_——sat_—
(7) oO Trial[set for/re-set for]on___—_at
(8) oO [Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continued to at
(9) a This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agreement/pursuant to]
CUFRCP4(m) (General Rule21 CO FRCP41(a)(1) O FRCP41(a)(2).
(10) MM [Other docket entry] Enter Memorandum Opinion and Order. Defendant Elizabeth Gilbert has moved

for reconsideration, which we now grant in part. We reduce that time by eight hours, at $225 per hour.

The amended award is $13,509.20.

a [For further detail see order attached to the original minute order.]

No notices required, advised in open court,

No notices required. number of notices

Notices mailed by judge's staff.

APR 1 5 2002

date docketed

ay deputy initials

Notified counsel by telephone.
Docketing to mail notices.

Mail AO 450 form.

Copy to judge/magistrate judge.

date mailed notice

courtroom
WAH deputy’s
initials at ,
Date/time'rectived in .

central Clerk’s Office ‘ailing deputy initials



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ,
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS “\ AN
EASTERN DIVISION ‘ ait
3COM CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,

vs. No. 01 C 839

ELIZABETH GILBERT,

eevee eee

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On February 8, 2002, we granted plaintiff's motion for fees and costs incurred to effect
service. Defendant Elizabeth Gilbert has moved for reconsideration, which we now grant in
part. We earlier pointed out that plaintiff's actual expenses were considerably greater than
the amount actually awarded because the entitlement to fees and costs did not arise until after
numerous attempts at service. And the failure to serve can, at best and charitably, be
characterized as caused by defendant’s inadvertence.

Nevertheless, we recognize that we may award fees and costs only for the time after
failure to return the waiver. Defendant complains that 22.9 hours were spent on researching
alternative methods of service. That is somewhat of an overstatement — much of that time was
devoted to other matters, including drafting a detailed motion and affidavit. Even so, the time

expended is considerable. We reduce that time by eight hours, at $225 per hour. The

en

\ JAMES B. MORAN
Seslior Judge, U. S, District Court

amended award is $13,509.20,

Rar 1}, 2002.
Ql |
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 2 of 16 PageID #:2
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 3 of 16 PageID #:3
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 4 of 16 PageID #:4
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 5 of 16 PageID #:5
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 6 of 16 PageID #:6
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 7 of 16 PageID #:7
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 8 of 16 PageID #:8
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 9 of 16 PageID #:9
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 10 of 16 PageID #:10
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 11 of 16 PageID #:11
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 12 of 16 PageID #:12
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 13 of 16 PageID #:13
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 14 of 16 PageID #:14
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 15 of 16 PageID #:15
Case: 1:03-cv-00611 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/27/03 Page 16 of 16 PageID #:16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F i L E
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ASTERN DIVISION :
EASTERN DIVIS Juin 92 2004 °Q
Mic

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) @LEAK, Uc: BISTAIGY BOUT
)
)
) No. 02 CR 1100-1

v. )

)

RICHARD GARVIN ) Judge Gottschall DOCKETED
‘ 4
) JUN 23 2004
)

” RELEASE OF JUDGMENT LIEN
Judgment was against the defendant, in the above-entitled cause in the United States District
Court, for the Northem District of Illinois. The judgment having been paid or otherwise satisfied is
hereby released. The Clerk of the United States District Court is hereby authorized and empowered to
satisfy said judgment ofrecord. The lien recorded at the Cook County Recorder's Office as document
number 036332132, on December 29, 2003 is hereby released.

Respectfully submitted,

PATRICK J. FITZGERALD

Assiftant United States Attorney
219 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Mlinois 60604
(312)469-6008

March 2001 / q
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1242

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the nonrefundable

personal credits, the standard deduction, and the deduction for personal

exemptions in determining alternative minimum tax liability.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 1, 1997

Mr. KERREY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the

nonrefundable personal credits, the standard deduction,

and the deduction for personal exemptions in determining

alternative minimum tax liability.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1242 IS

1 SECTION 1. NONREFUNDABLE PERSONAL CREDITS, THE

2 STANDARD DEDUCTION, AND THE DEDUC3 TION FOR PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS ALLOWED

4 IN DETERMINING ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM

5 TAX LIABILITY.

6 (a) ALLOWANCE OF NONREFUNDABLE PERSONAL

7 CREDITS.—Subsection (a) of section 26 of the Internal

8 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation based on tax

9 liability; definition of tax liability) is amended to read as

10 follows:

11 ‘‘(a) LIMITATION BASED ON AMOUNT OF TAX.—The

12 aggregate amount of credits allowed by this subpart for

13 the taxable year shall not exceed the sum of—

14 ‘‘(1) the taxpayer’s regular tax liability for the

15 taxable year, plus

16 ‘‘(2) the tax imposed by section 55 for such

17 taxable year.’’

18 (b) ALLOWANCE OF STANDARD DEDUCTION AND DE19 DUCTION FOR PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS.—Paragraph (1)

20 of section 56(b) of such Code is amended by striking sub21 paragraph (E) and by redesignating subparagraph (F) as

22 subparagraph (E).

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

24 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

25 December 31, 1997.

Æ