alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION

 
| Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I hereby certify that: |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| I have reviewed the Annual Report on  Form 10-K, as amended by this Form 10-K/A; |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

to the best of my knowledge, this Annual Report on Form 10-K (i) fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d); and (ii) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Tengasco, Inc. and its subsidiaries during the period covered by this Report.

 

Dated: September 13, 2005

 
|   | s/Mark A. RuthMark A. Ruth,Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003 of Hartford Life, Inc. (the "Company"), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as enacted by
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Thomas M. Marra
                                 -------------------
                                 Name: Thomas M. Marra
                                 Title:President and Chief Operating Officer
                                 Date: August 6, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hartford Life, Inc. and will be
retained by Hartford Life, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Stephen Forsyth, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Medicsight, Inc;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | By: | /s/STEPHEN FORSYTHStephen Forsyth
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------

April 8,
2004

---

QuickLinks
Case: 1:01-cv-07716 Document #: 8 Filed: 10/03/02 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:18
Case: 1:01-cv-07716 Document #: 8 Filed: 10/03/02 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:19
Case: 1:01-cv-07716 Document #: 8 Filed: 10/03/02 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:20
Case: 1:01-cv-07716 Document #: 8 Filed: 10/03/02 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:21
#### Elizabeth Repplier *v.*Jacob D. Zeldes et al.

Decided February 21, 1990

*Mary F. Haddon,*in support of the petition.

*Karen Goodwin,*in opposition.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Executive Office of the President

###### Office of National Drug Control Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP).

# ACTION:

Notice of Appointments.

# SUMMARY:

The following persons have been appointed to the ONDCP Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board: Ms. Martha Gagné (as Chair), Mr. Kemp Chester, Mr. Eric Talbot, and Ms. Michele Marx.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Please direct any questions to Robert Kent, General Counsel, (202) 881-8815, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: July 26, 2021.

Robert Kent,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2021-16167 Filed 7-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3280-F5-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen D. Linehan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ STEPHEN D. LINEHAN                                  
|Stephen D. Linehan President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: August 5, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                          52,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (700)
<INVENTORY>                                        112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,009
<PP&E>                                           9,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,757)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,237
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,051)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,648
<SALES>                                         14,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,959
<CGS>                                            6,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (89)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,526)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,526)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Aaron M. Lerman, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Samenga, J.), rendered September 5, 1984, as amended September 10, 1984, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (five counts), attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (two counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial of that branch of defendant’s omnibus motion which sought dismissal of the indictment.

Judgment, as amended, reversed, on the law, and that branch of defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the indictment granted, without prejudice to the People to resubmit the *666matter to another Grand Jury, if they be so advised. The findings of fact are affirmed.

Upon this record we conclude that defendant was deprived of a reasonably fair and uninterrupted opportunity pursuant to CPL 190.50 to first furnish the Grand Jury with his own version concerning the matters being investigated *(see, People v Durante,*97 AD2d 851). Defendant appeared before the Grand Jury which was considering charges against him and submitted a waiver of immunity pursuant to CPL 190.45. He was permitted to give only a short statement before he was interrupted and examined at length by the prosecutor. Defendant twice asked the prosecutor for permission to explain himself, but was again permitted to give only short statements before being examined by the prosecutor. Accordingly, that branch of defendant’s omnibus motion which sought to dismiss the indictment should have been granted, without prejudice to the People to resubmit the matter to another Grand Jury, if they be so advised. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Hooper, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2521

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Ann C.

Morrill,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY; JOHNS HOPKINS

HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS CORPORATION,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.

(CA-02-3891-1-CCB)

Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 18, 2005

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Baltimore,

Maryland, for the United States. Ann C. Morrill, Owings Mills,

Maryland, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Preston Scheeler, Kurt James

Fischer, Michelle Jeanine Dickinson, DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US

LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Sheldon Krantz, DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY

CARY US LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ann C. Morrill appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her qui tam action under the False Claims Act. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Morrill

v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. CA-02-3891-1-CCB (D. Md. filed Oct. 29,

2004 & entered Nov. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 94A/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.094.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 94A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5223 April 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.094.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 94A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5223 April 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2009/C 094A/01 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2009/C 094A/01

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2009/C 094A/02 | REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs | s3 |

2009/C 094A/02

REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal L 292/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 292 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 509 November 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 292

English edition

Legislation

Volume 509 November 2007

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | 2007/694/EC |
| | * | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2007 — Amending budget No 2 | 1 |
| | | 2007/695/EC |
| | * | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2007 — Amending budget No 2 | 9 |
| | | 2007/696/EC |
| | * | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2007 — Amending budget No 1 | 39 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

BUDGETS

2007/694/EC

*

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2007 — Amending budget No 2

1

2007/695/EC

*

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2007 — Amending budget No 2

9

2007/696/EC

*

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2007 — Amending budget No 1

39

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 99.2
Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Dale G. Rettinger, the Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of 1996-D Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 
- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

___/s/ Dale G. Rettinger      

Name: Dale G. Rettinger

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: ___May 13, 2003_________
#### In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant, v Emily Barbera et al., Respondents.

—In a proceeding to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), entered February 7, 1985, which dismissed the petition and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

On or about September 6, 1976, the respondents were injured in an automobile accident in Nassau County which involved an allegedly uninsured vehicle. The car in which the respondents were riding was insured by the petitioner under a policy which provided coverage for accidents involving uninsured vehicles. A demand for arbitration was mailed by the respondents’ attorney on April 11, 1983 to the petitioner’s regional office in Suffolk County and was received on April 12, 1983. Printed clearly on the first page of the demand was the address of the office of the appellant responsible for handling *802respondents’ claim, which was in Woodbury, New York, a community in Nassau County. The demand was, in fact, forwarded to the Woodbury office but, for some reason, on the back of the envelope containing the demand was stamped "received, April 14, 1983, Brookhaven DCO”. Belying upon this date, the Woodbury office waited until May 3, 1983 to serve their petition to stay arbitration, one day after the 20-day Statute of Limitations of CPLR 7503 (c) had expired.

Under these circumstances, it cannot be said that the petitioner was deprived of a fair opportunity to respond to the demand for arbitration in timely fashion *(see, Matter of CNA Ins. Co. v Glass,*75 AD2d 600). To the contrary, the reason for petitioner’s tardiness was the neglect of its own employees in stamping an incorrect date of receipt on the envelope containing the demand and subsequently relying upon that date *(cf. Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co. v Boisette,*105 AD2d 785). Accordingly, the petitioner’s application to stay arbitration was properly dismissed. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
# C_2019166EN.01000601.xml

| 15.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

14 May 2019

(2019/C 166/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1226 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,00 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4691 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86723 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7790 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1307 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7990 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,751 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,23 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3061 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7615 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,7732 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6162 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5117 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8112 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7056 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5366 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 333,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9746 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7252 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4113 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 199,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6818 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,898 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,2104 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,362 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4743 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5178 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,0375 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1226

JPY

Japanese yen

123,00

DKK

Danish krone

7,4691

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86723

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7790

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1307

ISK

Iceland króna

137,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7990

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,751

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,23

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3061

RON

Romanian leu

4,7615

TRY

Turkish lira

6,7732

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6162

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5117

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8112

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7056

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5366

KRW

South Korean won

1 333,20

ZAR

South African rand

15,9746

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7252

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4113

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 199,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6818

PHP

Philippine peso

58,898

RUB

Russian rouble

73,2104

THB

Thai baht

35,362

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4743

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5178

INR

Indian rupee

79,0375

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
### NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00 332

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI C EDINBURG

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

, Appellant,

v.

AMIR TURCIOS

, Appellee.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellee ’ s third unopposed motion for extension

of time to file the brief. This Court has previo usly granted appellee two extensions for

the filing of appellee ’s brief in this cause. The appellee ’s current deadline for filing

appellee ’s brief is February 23, 2015

.2

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellee' s third motion for

e xtension of time to file the brief, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellee' s
motion for extension of time to file the brief should be granted

. Appellee ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby gran ted, and

the Honorable Joseph A. Connors III , counsel for appellees, is hereby ORDERED to file

the appellee ’s brief with this Court on or before April 30, 2015 . No further extensions will

be granted in this matter.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed T he 20 th day of March , 201 5

.