alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Ayele Locoh-Donou, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 911]

*1345Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1997, was suspended by this Court’s order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a *(Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a,*65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts *(see*22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Case: 1:02-cv-01828 Document #: 43 Filed: 02/14/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:300
Ne Fon (06/97)

U

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Ni f Assigned Jud; + Sitti 7
soe Magistrate Judge Geraldine Soat Brown than Arsigned Judge
CASE NUMBER 02 C $266 DATE 7128/2004
CASE Gibson vs. Barnhart
TITLE

[In the following box (a) indicate the party filing the motion, e.g., plaintiff, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the nature

of the motion being presented.)

qt)

MOTION:

DOCKET ENTRY:

(ld) Oo Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]

(2) Oo Brief in support of motion due

3) QO Answer brief to motion due___. Reply to answer brief due.

(4) QO Ruling/Hearing on___setfor___—_at

(5) Oo Status hearing[held/continued to] {set for/re-set for] on setfor_ at

(6) a Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for]on____—ssetfor__—at__

”TM oOo Trial[set for/re-set for] on___at

(8) Qa [Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continued to ____at

(9) Qo This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agreement/pursuant to]
OFRCP4(m) O Local Rule 41.1 OCOFRCP41(a)(1) OO FRCP41(a)(2).

qo) =o [Other docket entry] For the reasons set out in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff's

motion for summary. judgment [16-1] is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment
[25-1] is DENIED, judgment is entered for Plaintiff, and this case is remanded to the Commissioner for

further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Terminate case. Punther

a [For further detail see order attached to the original minute order.]

No notices required, advised in open court.

No notices required. umber of notices

Y | Notices mailed by judge's staff. 7004
Notified counsel by telephone, JUL 2 J COU
Docketing to mail notices.

VY | Mail AO 450 form. on ing ed Mets

ey PAINS 5
Copy to judge/magistrate judge. quggd Lon Lsia 'S
W Nl] ‘Tra/2004
» date mailed notice
courtroom vy ep ane hoe
GR deputy’s 1s vd 2 WAT HOee cn
initials —
+, Date/timesre sifed de
Ldentral Clerils Oittee ring depty nts
Exhibit 12.1

<TABLE>

<CAPTION>
                        U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc.
   Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
                                 (in thousands)



                                                         Three months ended
                                                 ----------------------------------
                                                      3/31/99           3/31/98
                                                 ----------------  ----------------

<S>                                              <C>               <C>
Net Income                                        $      2,510      $      4,404

Fixed Charges:
   Interest Expense                                      6,739             3,261
   Capitalized Interest                                    305                --
   Preferred Dividend Requirements                       1,776             1,776
                                                 ----------------  ----------------
Total Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
   Dividends                                             8,820             5,037

Less Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements               1,776             1,776
                                                 ----------------  ----------------
Earnings                                          $      9,554      $      7,665
                                                 ================  ================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                       1.36x (1)         2.35x
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed
   Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends                 1.08x (1)         1.52x
</TABLE>


              (1) During the three  months  ended  March 31,  1999,  the Company
                  recorded a  non-cash,  unusual  charge of $2,550  relating  to
                  contingent OP units accrued  according to the 1997 termination
                  of the  management  contract.  Excluding  the  effects of this
                  unusual charge, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and the
                  ratio of  earnings  to combined  fixed  charges and  preferred
                  stock dividends would have been 1.72x and 1.37x,  respectively
                  for the three months ended March 31, 1999.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1248 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1248

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel SUMMER BREEZE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 1997

  Mrs. Murray introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel SUMMER BREEZE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106 through 12108 of 
title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue 
a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel SUMMER BREEZE, United 
States official number 552808.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael R. Palmer, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 775] —

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Foley, J.), imposed November 4, 2009, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that his sentence was excessive *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]). Mastro, A.P.J., Dillon, Eng, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 24, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00200-CR 

ANDREW ANDERSON, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F19-52721-R 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Kennedy, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Garcia 

In this accelerated appeal, appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying 

his motion to reduce bond pending appeal for his conviction in cause number 05-22-

00755-CR. By judgment dated August 10, 2023, this Court affirmed as modified 

appellant’s underlying conviction. See Anderson v. State, No. 05-22-00755-CR, 

2023 WL 5123305, at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 10, 2023, no pet. h.) (mem. op., 

not designated for publication). Therefore, the issues raised in this accelerated 

appeal are moot. See Freeman v. State, 828 S.W.2d 179, 181–82 (Tex. App.—
 –2– 

Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, pet. ref’d) (cause becomes moot when appellate court’s 

judgment cannot have any practical legal effect upon controversy). 

We dismiss this accelerated appeal as moot. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 

230200F.U05 

 

/Dennise Garcia/ 

DENNISE GARCIA 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ANDREW ANDERSON, Appellant 

No. 05-23-00200-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 265th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F19-52721-R. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia. 

Justices Pedersen, III and Kennedy 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED as 

moot. 

Judgment entered August 24, 2023
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000096

18-JUL-2018

11:41 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      15,067,000
<SECURITIES>                                35,581,300
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,841,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   427,800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            79,584,600
<PP&E>                                      18,754,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,691,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,940,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,605,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,493,800
<OTHER-SE>                                  67,831,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                88,940,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,767,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,612,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,752,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,589,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,953,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,636,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,636,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
Case: 1:02-cv-01764 Document #: 84 Filed: 02/25/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:576
# Official Journal L 261/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 261 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5730 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 261

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5730 August 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | | 2014/494/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 16 June 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part | 1 |
| | | Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part | 4 |
| | | 2014/495/Euratom |
| | * | Council Decision of 16 June 2014 approving the conclusion, by the European Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part | 744 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

2014/494/EU

*

Council Decision of 16 June 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part

1

Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part

4

2014/495/Euratom

*

Council Decision of 16 June 2014 approving the conclusion, by the European Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part

744

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 21 Filed: 04/28/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:180
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I,
Michael Rivers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IBSG International, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers quarter ending September 30, 2007 that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

5. The small
business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditor and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael Rivers     
|                    |  |     |  | Michael Rivers         
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Barrett *v.*Mason.

May 13, 1915.

Trover. Before Judge Fite. Gordon superior court. August 28, 1914.

*Maddox, McCamy & Shumate,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. G. B. Erwin,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. C. R. Mason instituted an action of trover against Webb Barrett, to recover a described check on a bank, signed by plaintiff and made payable to defendant, alleged to be of the value of $50; and a described promissory note signed by plaintiff and made payable to defendant, which was alleged to be of the value of $150. In connection with the petition the plaintiff made the statutory affidavit for the purpose of requiring defendant to give bail. At the trial term the plaintiff offered an amendment to his petition, which alleged: “that since bringing this suit he has sold the mare received from deft, in consideration of said note and check sued for at and for the sum of $100, which 'was her market value. Plff. further shows that he demanded of deft, his check and note, and tendered to deft, said mare, which was refused by deft. Plff. sues for the difference between $200 check and note and price of mare.” *Held,*that the allowance of the amendment over objec tion was erroneous.

2. The error in allowing the amendment entered into the further trial of the ease; and the plaintiff having recovered a verdict, and the defendant having made a motion for new trial and filed a bill of exceptions, assigning error upon the judgment refusing a new trial, and upon the judgment allowing .the amendment, the judgment of the trial court is

*Reversed.*

*All Ihe Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. GABRIEL GUEVARA, a.k.a. Guevara Gabriel, a.k.a. Guevara Grabiel, a.k.a. Grabriel Guevara, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-50320 D.C. No. 5:12-cr-00052-VAP-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 24, 2014 ** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. Gabriel Guevara appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 156-month sentence for possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d), and felon in possession 

# FILED
SEP 04 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Guevara’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Guevara the oppor tunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Guevara has waived his right to appeal his conviction and 156-month sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED.

2
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Animal Biosciences & Biotechnology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Announcements
                        ABBL Journal Club
                    USDA Civil Rights Policy StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Animal Biosciences & Biotechnology Laboratory People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- ARS News Articles
- Research Projects
- Publications

Kate  Miska    Molecular Biologist 301-504-5596  Testing the use of alternative protein sources for use in broiler production. Determining the expression of components of nutrient uptake and absorption such as amino acid transport during chick development, and in response to dietary changes. Defining bacteria present in guts of healthy chickens tracking microbiome changes during development as well as in response to different diet.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov