alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.02
 HARTFORD LIFE, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hartford Life, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained
in SEC Release 34-47986];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Glenn D. LammeyGlenn D. LammeyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 62
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00016-CV

______________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

WINFRED MARBUT AND CHARLOTTE MARBUT

AND IN THE INTEREST OF M.M., A CHILD

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

 Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 07-D-1537-CCL

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
See TEX. R. APP. P. 32. 1

2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Charlotte Marbut, appellant, filed her notice of appeal January 20, 2009. 

Marbut has not filed a docketing statement with this Court, paid a filing fee, or made any 1

claim of indigency. There is nothing in the record to indicate Marbut has made efforts to have either

the clerk's record or reporter's record filed with this Court, and she has not filed a brief.

On March 23, 2009, we contacted Marbut by letter, giving her an opportunity to cure the various

defects, and warning her that, if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, this appeal

would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

We have received no communication from Marbut. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b).

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: April 16, 2009

Date Decided: April 17, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Omar GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ, also known as Omar Fernandez-Gonzalez, also known as Carlos Gonzalez-Hernandez, also known as Carlos Manuel Gonzalez-Hernandez, also known as Omar Hernandez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-40207

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 2009.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant. ■

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rehearing is granted.

An amended transcript of the sentencing shows that the written sentence of three years supervised release accords with the oral sentence. Our record being inconsistent, we follow the request of the defendant with our remand for the district court to decide whether further action should be taken. REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Paul E. Ross,certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meade InstrumentsCorp.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting

Date: October 15,2007
| By:      | /s/ PAUL E. ROSS                              |   |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|     | Paul E. Ross                                  |   |
| * * | *Senior  Vice President—Finance and CFO* |   |

 

----
# Official Journal L 273/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 273 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6225 October 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 273

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6225 October 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1744 of 17 September 2019 on technical specifications for electronic ship reporting in inland navigation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 164/2010 | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1744 of 17 September 2019 on technical specifications for electronic ship reporting in inland navigation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 164/2010

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### In the Matter of Juanita V., Respondent, v Paul J. Lo P., Appellant.

In apaternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the appeals, by permission, are from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Palmer, J.), dated March 25, 1983, adjudging appellant to be the father of a child born out of wedlock, and (2) a resettled order of filiation of the same court, dated March 29, 1983.

Appeal from the order dated March 25, 1983 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the resettled order dated March 29, 1983.

Resettled order dated March 29, 1983 affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner was divorced on February 18, 1980. She testified that she met appellant, a bus driver then on a 4-12 midnight *584shift, in January 1981, on the bus that he was driving; that thereafter he came to her apartment on a number of occasions; that they had sexual relations there on the night of February 4, 1981; and that between February 4 and August 29, 1981, they had sexual relations about "Thirty times, I guess. Twenty five”. She kept a record in her diary indicating the occasions upon which she had sexual relations with appellant. In March 1981 she learned that she was pregnant. On November 3, 1981 she gave birth to a child. She asserts that appellant is the father of the child. She produced greeting cards allegedly handprinted by appellant and given to her.

The results of a human leucocyte antigen (HLA) test taken of petitioner, appellant and the child were admitted into evidence at the fact-finding hearing *(see,*Family Ct Act § 532). The HLA test report stated under the heading "Calculations of Plausibility of Paternity” that the "Combined Paternity Index” was 96.4% and that the "Plausibility of Paternity” was 99%.

Appellant testified that he was a driver on the subject bus route from January to June 1981; that "I may have spoken to her on the bus, but I don’t recall”; that he had never been to her apartment from January through September 1981; and that he had never had sexual relations with her.

The Family Court found that petitioner had established by clear and convincing evidence that appellant is the father of the child. The court stated that "even without the test I would have found the petitioner’s testimony far more credible” than that of appellant.

The determination as to paternity rested basically on a resolution of credibility. We find no reason to disturb the trial court’s assessment of credibility and conclude that the testimony, evidence and HLA test results *(see, Matter of Department of Social Servs. v Thomas J.S.,*100 AD2d 119, *appeal dismissed*63 NY2d 675; *Matter of Sherry K. v Carpenter,*90 AD2d 687) establish by clear and convincing evidence that appellant is the father of the subject child. Lazer, J. P., Rubin, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the foregoing Report
on Form 10-KSB pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78) and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial Corporation as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                     |  |     |  |                                |  | 
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------ |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul C. Hudson             |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | Paul C. Hudson                 |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer        |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | Broadway Financial Corporation |  | 
|                     |  |     | 
|Date: March 30, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Samuel Sarpong             |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | Samuel Sarpong                 |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer        |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | Broadway Financial Corporation |  |
EXHIBIT 10.2



AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This Amendment No. 1 (the Amendment) to that certain Employment Agreement (the Agreement) dated as of August 1,
1997 between Notify Technology Corporation (the Company) and Paul DePond (the Employee) is made as of February 23, 2000.



In consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Employee agree as
follows:



1.    Section 3(a)
of the Agreement shall be amended so that it reads in its entirety as follows:



Base Compensation.    The Company shall pay the Employee as compensation for services a base salary at an annualized rate of $225,000. Such salary shall be reviewed at least annually and shall be
increased from time to time subject to accomplishment of such performance and contribution goals and objectives as may be established from time to time by the Board. Such salary shall be paid periodically in accordance with normal Company payroll.
The annual compensation specified in this Section 3(a), together with any increases in such compensation that the Board may grant from time to time, is referred to in this Agreement as Base Compensation.



This Amendment has been executed effective as of the first
date set forth above.



|NOTIFY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION        |  |  |  | EMPLOYEE             
|------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                                    
|/s/    PAUL
DEPOND                   |  |  |  | /s/    PAUL F.
DEPOND
|Paul DePond, Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Paul F. DePond
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Paul DePond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Notify Technology Corporation.



|
|
|
|







I, Gerald W. Rice, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Notify Technology Corporation.



|
|
|
|
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

Section 302 Certification

 

I, Charles W. Ergen, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation; and

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   April 30, 2015             |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |
| */s/   Charles W. Ergen*                |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alberto Rodrigo, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered on June 16, 1983, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 146 (Tuesday, August 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 41851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16460]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 18, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Karen Smith, Director, 
Applications) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Jon Rex Jones; the Jon Rex Jones Dynasty Trust, Jon Rex Jones, 
Jr. and Brenda Wilkinson Jones, as co-trustees; the Jon Rex Jones Jr. 
Dynasty Trust, Brenda Wilkinson Jones, as trustee; the Jon Rex Jones 
Jr. Trust V, Jon Rex Jones, Jr., as trustee; the Debora L. Jones Trust 
V and the JAJ Trust V, Julie Ann Jarvis, as trustee of both trusts; and 
the Stephen Martin Jones Trust V, Stephen Martin Jones, as trustee, all 
of Austin, Texas; as a group acting in concert to retain voting shares 
of Albany Bancshares, Inc. and indirectly retain voting shares of First 
National Bank of Albany/Breckenridge, both of Albany, Texas. 
Additionally, Jon Rex Jones, Jr., in his capacity as proxy with power 
to exercise the largest block of voting shares, to acquire additional 
voting shares of Albany Bancshares and indirectly acquire voting shares 
of National Bank of Albany/Breckenridge.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 28, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-16460 Filed 8-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
# Official Journal C 352/23 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 352 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5823 October 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 352

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5823 October 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 352/1 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — sixth supplement to the 33rd complete edition | 1 |
| 2015/C 352/2 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 33rd complete edition | 33 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 352/1

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — sixth supplement to the 33rd complete edition

1

2015/C 352/2

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 33rd complete edition

33

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN