alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Smith, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 85] —

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered July 9, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of IV2 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The court credited the testimony of two police officers that defendant, upon becoming startled by their presence, spontaneously and voluntarily dropped a plastic bag containing crack cocaine, and there is no basis to disturb the court’s credibility determinations *(see generally People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). There is nothing in the record to support the conclusion that the officers’ testimony was tailored to meet constitutional objection *(see People v Harris,*186 AD2d 390 [1992], *lv denied*80 NY2d 1027 [1992]). Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Insperity, Inc.; and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ Douglas S. Sharp |
|   | Douglas S. Sharp |
|   | Senior Vice President of Finance, |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 8 Filed: 02/12/02 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:25
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 8 Filed: 02/12/02 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:26
Case: 1:01-cv-08781 Document #: 8 Filed: 02/12/02 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:27
Case: 1:02-cv-05221 Document #: 479 Filed: 04/04/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:9671
Case: 1:02-cv-05221 Document #: 479 Filed: 04/04/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:9672
#### John Rivera, Respondent, v City of New York, Defendant, and Julio Miranda, Appellant.

—In an action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for false arrest and assault, the defendant Miranda appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated June 14, 1984, which denied his motion to vacate a default judgment.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Since the defendant Miranda failed to set forth a meritorious defense, Special Term properly denied vacatur of the *593default judgment. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32.1




**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Solution Technology
      International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies that to such officer’s knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




DATE:
              April 2, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Dan
              L.
              JonsonDan
                L. Jonson
              Chief
                Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesse Alston, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 477]

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated January 22, 2001 *(People v Alston,*279 AD2d 583 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 8, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the *867effective assistance of appellate counsel (see *Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Austin, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998 
<CASH>                                          19,250,000     
<SECURITIES>                                    24,374,000     
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,135,000     
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,114,000)    
<INVENTORY>                                      4,438,000   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,647,000   
<PP&E>                                         191,505,000   
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (62,459,000)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413,237,000   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,131,000   
<BONDS>                                        208,900,000   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0   
<PREFERRED>                                              0   
<COMMON>                                           136,000   
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,760,000     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413,237,000   
<SALES>                                         10,513,000   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,280,000   
<CGS>                                            9,469,000   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,887,000   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,687,000   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,760,000   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,841,000   
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (836,000)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,005,000   
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0   
<CHANGES>                                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,005,000   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .15    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .14    
                                             

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.6.1

                               AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO
                              SC110NAV05 AGREEMENT

                                     BETWEEN

                        SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY
                                       AND
                                 VISUAL NETWORKS

This Amendment No. 7 (the "Amendment") by and between Sprint/United Management
Company, a Kansas Corporation ("Sprint"), and Visual Networks, a Delaware
corporation ("Supplier"), amends the MASTER RESELLER AGREEMENT dated August 23,
1996, by and between Sprint and Supplier (the "Agreement"). Except as otherwise
indicated, defined terms in this Amendment have the same meaning as in the
Agreement.

I.       BACKGROUND

         A.       Supplier and Sprint entered into the Agreement on August 23,
                  1996.
         B.       Sprint and Supplier agree to modify the Agreement as set forth
                  in this Amendment.

In consideration of the promises and agreements contained in this Amendment, the
parties agree as follows:

II.      AMENDMENT

         The parties agree to modify the paragraph (a) to Article 2.0 of the
         Agreement as follows:

         This Agreement begins on the Effective Date and will remain in force
         for a period of three (3) years and nine (9) months, unless terminated
         as provided in this Agreement.

III.     GENERAL

         Other than as set forth above, the Agreement remains unchanged and in
         full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the terms of
         the Agreement and this Amendment, this Amendment will control.

         This Amendment, executed by authorized representatives of Sprint and
         Supplier, is made a part of and incorporates the terms and conditions
         of the Agreement.

SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT                    VISUAL NETWORKS
COMPANY

/s/ Frank J. Clifford                       /s/ Richard H. Deily
---------------------                       --------------------
SIGNATURE                                   SIGNATURE

Frank J. Clifford                           Richard H. Deily
Lead Negotiator                             Director, Treasury Operations

March 23, 2000                              March 23, 2000
-----------------                           -----------------
DATE                                        DATE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Lee Brims, Jr., Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 881] —

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Apotheker, J.), imposed February 16, 2011, which, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, imposed periods of postrelease supervision in connection with his convictions of manslaughter in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree in addition to the concurrent determinate terms of imprisonment previously imposed on September 27, 2000.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his prior motion, in *900effect, pursuant to CPL 440.20, to vacate his illegal sentence, which he subsequently, in effect, withdrew, did not divest the County Court of its authority to correct a *“Sparber*error” *(People v Lingle,*16 NY3d 621, 629 [2011]; *see People v Sparber,*10 NY3d 457 [2008]) upon notice from-the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision pursuant to Correction Law § 601-d. It was within the trial court’s inherent power to correct the error made at sentencing *(see People v Williams,*14 NY3d 198, 212 [2010], *cert denied*562 US —, 131 S Ct 125 [2010]; *People v Richardson,*100 NY2d 847, 852-853 [2003]; *People v Wright,*56 NY2d 613, 614 [1982]; *People v Minaya,*54 NY2d 360, 364 [1981], *cert denied*455 US 1024 [1982]). A *Sparber*error “ ‘amounts only to a procedural error . . . which the sentencing court [can] easily remedy’ ” *(People v Lingle,*16 NY3d at *634*[emphasis omitted], quoting *People v Sparber,*10 NY3d at 472). Mastro, A.P.J., Balkin, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 10473

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:16

- cr - 00154

- WTM

- GRS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus TERIN MOSS,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Ap peal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________ Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, J ORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges : BY THE COURT: A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERE D that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.

Case: 17-10473 Date Filed: 07/15/2019 Page: 1 of 1
Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 272 Filed: 03/22/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1550
Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 272 Filed: 03/22/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:1551
Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 272 Filed: 03/22/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:1552
Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 272 Filed: 03/22/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:1553
Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 272 Filed: 03/22/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:1554
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE 
PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996, AS SET FORTH IN ITS FORM 10-K FOR SUCH PERIOD
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-1996
<CASH>                                          14,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,853
<INVENTORY>                                     94,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               285,499
<PP&E>                                         295,548
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 546,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,338
<BONDS>                                         95,920
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           191
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   546,486
<SALES>                                        644,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               644,301
<CGS>                                          427,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  427,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sontra Medical Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Sean F. Moran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Sean F. Moran      
|-----------------------
|Sean F. Moran          
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 12, 2003
# Official Journal C 84/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 84 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 626 March 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 84

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 626 March 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2019/C 84/01 CON/2019/6 | Opinion of the European Central Bank of 13 February 2019 on a proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (CON/2019/6) | 1 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

European Central Bank

2019/C 84/01 CON/2019/6

Opinion of the European Central Bank of 13 February 2019 on a proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (CON/2019/6)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 84/02 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2019/C 84/03 | Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (
  1
  ) | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 84/02

Euro exchange rates

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2019/C 84/03

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Poisonous Plant Research: Logan, UT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    IACUC SummariesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Logan, Utah Poisonous Plant Research Docs





- Poisonous Plants By Toxic Syndrome
- Stakeholder Meetings
- Bulletin 415
- Poisonous Plants by Toxic Syndrome
- International Journal of Poisonous Plant Research

Stakeholder Meetingsheadline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 13-1701

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

CAREY GONYER,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on August 4, 2014 is

corrected as follows:

On page 27, line 15, replace "at the time of at least one"

with "at the time at least one"
Exhibit 23.1 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements (No. 333-17331 and No. 333-102138) on Form S-8 of Broadway Financial Corporation of our report dated March 17, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Broadway Financial Corporationand subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive earnings, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Broadway Financial Corporation. 

/s/ Crowe Chizek and CompanyLLP                         

South Bend, Indiana 

March 28, 2006
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Sontra Medical Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sean F. Moran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Sean F. Moran      
|Sean F. Moran          
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 9, 2005         



26
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 1 of 30 PageID #:97
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 2 of 30 PageID #:98
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 3 of 30 PageID #:99
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 4 of 30 PageID #:100
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 5 of 30 PageID #:101
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 6 of 30 PageID #:102
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 7 of 30 PageID #:103
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 8 of 30 PageID #:104
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 9 of 30 PageID #:105
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 10 of 30 PageID #:106
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 11 of 30 PageID #:107
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 12 of 30 PageID #:108
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 13 of 30 PageID #:109
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 14 of 30 PageID #:110
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 15 of 30 PageID #:111
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 16 of 30 PageID #:112
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 17 of 30 PageID #:113
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 18 of 30 PageID #:114
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 19 of 30 PageID #:115
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 20 of 30 PageID #:116
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 21 of 30 PageID #:117
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 22 of 30 PageID #:118
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 23 of 30 PageID #:119
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 24 of 30 PageID #:120
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 25 of 30 PageID #:121
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 26 of 30 PageID #:122
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 27 of 30 PageID #:123
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 28 of 30 PageID #:124
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 29 of 30 PageID #:125
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/28/02 Page 30 of 30 PageID #:126