alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southwest Watershed Research Center: Tucson, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About SWRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Tucson, Arizona SWRC Docs





- Videos About SWRC Research
- SWRC Webcams

Videosheadline bar Research Overview at Southwest Watershed Research Center 60th Anniversary of the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed Healthy Rangelands: Control Gullies, Control Brush, Save Grasslands! SMAP (Soil Moisture Active Passive) Satellite Advances in Streamgaging | Reach-Scale Monitoring Experiment (1 of 2) Advances in Streamgaging | Reach-Scale Monitoring Experiment (2 of 2)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TRAVIS MARTIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-1171

[July 20, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-1928CF10A.

Travis Martin, Crestview, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# L_2013232EN.01S00301.xml

| 30.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 232/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 232/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Allan Rowley, Chief Financial Officer of MGTCapital Investments, Inc (formerly Medicsight, Inc). (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006and 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                | By:                     | /s/ ALLAN ROWLEY |   |
|----------------|-------------------------|------------------|--------|
|           | Allan Rowley            |
|           | Chief Financial Officer |
|           |                    |
| March 28, 2007 |

 

E-5

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,602
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    212,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               245,211
<PP&E>                                         123,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          187,458
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,508
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,985)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,532
<SALES>                                        340,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               343,355
<CGS>                                          221,548
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  349,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,896)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,792
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,104)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,104)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.92)


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Genetics Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Crop Genetics Research People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications

Linghe  Zeng    Research Geneticist (Plants) Crop Genetics Research Unit 141 Experiment Station Road PO Box 345 Stoneville, MS 38776 Office: 662.686.3626 Fax: 662.686.5218


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-5077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DENNIS GEOVANNY MARQUEZ-CORDOBA, a/k/a Angelo

Docavo Tie, a/k/a Dennis Marquez, a/k/a

Alfredo Gomez, a/k/a Dennis Geovanny Drakkar,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-05-179)

Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 13, 2006

 

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Geovanny Marquez-Cordoba pled guilty to one count

of reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a),

(b)(2) (2000). The district court sentenced Marquez-Cordoba to

ninety months of imprisonment. On appeal, counsel filed an Anders*

brief, in which he states that there are no meritorious issues for

appeal, but suggests that the district court imposed a sentence

that was unreasonable because it was greater than necessary to

serve the ends of justice. Marquez-Cordoba was advised of his

right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not filed a

brief. We affirm.

The district court sentenced Marquez-Cordoba within the

applicable advisory Guideline range and well below the twenty-year

statutory maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). We cannot

conclude that, under these circumstances, Marquez-Cordoba’s

sentence is unreasonable. See United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d

339, 345 (4th Cir. 2006); United States v. Green, 436 F.3d 449, 457

(4th Cir.) (finding that sentence imposed within properly

calculated advisory Guideline range is presumptively reasonable),

cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 2006 WL 1057741 (U.S. May 22, 2006) (No.

05-10474).

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for
- 3 -

appeal. We therefore affirm Marquez-Cordoba’s conviction and

sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Marquez-Cordoba,

in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the

United States for further review. If Marquez-Cordoba requests that

a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition

would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave

to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that

a copy thereof was served on Marquez-Cordoba. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Robinson, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of US Global Nanospace,
      Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
      report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
      of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


/s/ John Robinson                                  July 22, 2005
---------------------------
John Robinson
Chief Executive Officer
# In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

══════════ No. WR

- 92,046

- 03

══════════

EX PARTE DERIC EUGENE MADISON , Applicant

═══════════════════════════════════════ On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. W14

- 76000

- U(C) in the 291st District Court F rom Dallas County

═══════════════════════════════════════

Y EARY , J., filed a concurring opinion

. Applicant was convicted in 2015 of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction in
2016

. Madison v. State, No. 05

- 15

- 00859

- CR, 2016 WL 7163913 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Nov. 8, 2016) (not designated for pub lication)

. In July of
2022 , Applicant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction. T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC . art. 11.07. In hisMADISON

– 2

application, he alleg es that his trial counsel was ineffective for various

reasons. Today, the Court remands this application to the trial court to further develop the record. I join the Court’s remand order. But I write separately to address my thoughts concerning the doctrine of laches and its possible application to this case. See Ex p arte Smith , 444 S.W.3d 661 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding a trial court has the authority to sua sponte consider the doctrine of laches); Ex parte Bazille , ___ S.W.3d ___, No. WR

- 89,851

- 02, 2022 WL 108348 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 12, 2022) (Yeary, J., concur ring). The doctrine of laches ought to be considered in a case like this

one. Applicant’s appeal was finalized when the court of appeals issued its mandate in June of 2017 , but this writ application was not filed until five years later. 1 The record is als o silent regarding circumstances that may excuse Applicant’s delay, and at least some explanation for the long delay in filing should be provided. Consistent with this Court’s precedent, the trial court “ may sua sponte consider and determine whether laches should bar relief.” Smith , 444 S.W.3d at 667. If the trial court does so, it must give Applicant the opportunity to explain the reasons for the delay and give the State’s prosecutors and/or former counsel for Applican t an opportunity to state whether Applicant’s delay has caused any prejudice to their ability to defend against Applicant’s

1 “Our revised approach will permit courts to more broadly consider the diminished memories of trial participants and the diminished availability of the State’s evidence, both of which may often be said to occur beyond five years after a conviction becomes final.” Ex parte Perez , 398 S.W.3d 206, 216 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (citing Ex parte Steptoe , 132 S.W.3d 434, 437

– 39 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (Cochran, J., dissenting)).MADISON

– 3

claims. Id. at 670. And ultimately, the trial court may include findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the doctrine of laches in its response to this Court’s remand order. With these additional thoughts, I join the Court’s order.

FILED : January 25, 2023 DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In connection with the Annual Report of Blount International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James S. Osterman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (ii)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
    report.



Date: November 19, 2004

/s/ James S. Osterman
--------------------------
James S. Osterman
President and
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       18,546
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                210,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             235,684
<PP&E>                                       2,111,160
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,005,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,416,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,382,523
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     1,391
<OTHER-SE>                                   699,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,416,210
<SALES>                                      1,078,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,078,530
<CGS>                                        583,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,062,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           80,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (64,860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (64,860)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (64,860)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.00)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of March 31, 1998, and statements of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         673,313
<SECURITIES>                                   188,354
<RECEIVABLES>                                  573,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (30,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    403,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,115,860
<PP&E>                                       2,341,879
<DEPRECIATION>                               (598,671)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,474,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,242,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,994
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,818,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,474,166
<SALES>                                      1,308,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,628,411
<CGS>                                          656,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,171,077
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,223,695)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,223,695)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,223,695)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>