alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5.__6.,( 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-19

SUSAN JOHNSON, DAVE JOHNSON, 

KATHY RICH, SUSAN HINKINS, 

RICHARD GILLETTE, LINDA 

FULLER, LARRY JENT, JULIE JENT, 

RICHARD J. CHARRON, KRISTIN 

CHARRON, 

 Plaintiffs and Appellee, 

 v. 

ALPHA SIGMA PHI (MONTANA )

STATE UNIVERSITY CHAPTER), and 

CITY OF BOZEMAN, 

 Defendants and Appellants.

THIRD ORDER 

OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

MICHAEL SAN SOUCI , the mediator previously appointed in this matter, is retired. 

Accordingly, Mr. San Souci’s order of mediator appointment is hereby rescinded and

IT IS ORDERED THAT, ANNA WILLIAMS, whose name appears next on the list of

attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained 

pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required 

by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall 

run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the 

parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this 30th day of November, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Elizabeth Worth Lund

Brian Gallik

James Goetz

Henry Tsar

Alpha Sigma Phi (Montana Chapter)

11/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0619
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
  /s/ UMANG GUPTAUmang GuptaChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 25 Filed: 05/24/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:196
# Official Journal L 191/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 191 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5728 June 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 191

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5728 June 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 of 16 April 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 of 16 April 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cotton Ginning Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Cotton Ginning Research People & Locations







Tim D Hayes
                        Cotton Ginning Research

                        




                        
                        Supervisory Engineering Technician
                        Phone: (662) 686-3100
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Soil Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Carl P. Ranno, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s Carl P. Ranno,
----------------------------------
Carl P. Ranno,
Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2005
# Official Journal C 226/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 226 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4920 September 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 226

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4920 September 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 226/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 226/2 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 226/3 | Acknowledgement of receipt of letters concerning noise problems caused by Zaventem airport | 4 |
| 2006/C 226/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 4357 — Bridgepoint/Dorna) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 5 |
| 2006/C 226/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4341 — FCC/ALPINE) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |
| 2006/C 226/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4229 — APHL/L&R/NETCARE/GENERAL HEALTHCARE GROUP) (1) | 7 |
| 2006/C 226/7 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 226/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 226/2

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (1)

2

2006/C 226/3

Acknowledgement of receipt of letters concerning noise problems caused by Zaventem airport

4

2006/C 226/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 4357 — Bridgepoint/Dorna) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

5

2006/C 226/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4341 — FCC/ALPINE) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

2006/C 226/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4229 — APHL/L&R/NETCARE/GENERAL HEALTHCARE GROUP) (1)

7

2006/C 226/7

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case: 1:02-cr-00287 Document #: 24-2 Filed: 04/02/03 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:113
Case: 1:02-cr-00287 Document #: 24-2 Filed: 04/02/03 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:114
Case: 1:02-cr-00287 Document #: 24-2 Filed: 04/02/03 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:115
Case: 1:02-cr-00287 Document #: 24-2 Filed: 04/02/03 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:116
Case: 1:02-cr-00287 Document #: 24-2 Filed: 04/02/03 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:117
#### Johnny Al OSBORNE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Max WILLIAMS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-35325.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*154Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 19, 2011.

Johnny A1 Osborne, Jr., Ontario, OR, pro se.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Johnny A Osborne, Jr., an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional violations related to confiscated or destroyed property and disciplinary hearings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Osborne’s claims alleging unauthorized deprivation of property because Osborne has an adequate post-deprivation *155remedy in the form of the Oregon Tort Claims Act. *See Hudson v. Palmer,*468 U.S. 517, 588, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984) (unauthorized deprivation of property does not amount to a due process ■violation when a post-deprivation state remedy is available); *see also*Or.Rev.Stat. § 30.260 *et seq.*

The district court properly dismissed Osborne’s due process claim arising out of his prison disciplinary hearings because Osborne failed to allege that a protected liberty or property interest was at stake in the proceedings. *See Serrano v. Francis,*345 F.3d 1071, 1078 (9th Cir.2003) (due process “adhere[s] only when the disciplinary action implicates a protected liberty interest in some unexpected [manner] or imposes an atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to appoint Osborne counsel because Osborne failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances. *See Palmer v. Valdez,*560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir.2009) (“[A] court may under exceptional circumstances appoint counsel for indigent civil litigants[.]” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We do not consider matters not raised in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam).

Osborne’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          90,913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,378)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,173
<PP&E>                                          10,256
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,062)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,996
<BONDS>                                         20,788
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         80,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,564
<CGS>                                           10,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   408
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,218)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,809)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,809)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Roberto Ciaprazi, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

[944 NYS2d 795]—

Appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), entered November 30, 2010 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denying his grievance, and (2) from a judgment of said court, entered June 16, 2011 in Albany County, which denied petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.

In 2009, the Legislature enacted Correction Law § 803-b, which authorized the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision to issue “[1]united credit time allowances” (hereinafter LCTAs) to inmates who met certain criteria, including, as is relevant herein, those who successfully participated as an inmate program associate (hereinafter IPA) for a period of at least two years (Correction Law § 803-b, as added by L 2009, ch 56, § 1, part L, § 4).* Consequently, respondent Deputy Commissioner for Program Services issued a memorandum to the inmate population listing the program titles under the IPA provision of Correction Law § 803-b that qualify for the purpose of LCTAs. Petitioner, who served as a library clerk, filed a grievance alleging that law library clerks were improperly excluded *1568from the list of program titles eligible for LCTAs pursuant to Correction Law § 803-b. The grievance was ultimately denied by the Central Office Review Committee and petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the petition. The court thereafter denied petitioner’s subsequent motion for reconsideration. These appeals ensued.

We affirm. Neither the law library directive nor any other evidence in the record establishes that the IPA training is or ever was necessary in order to serve as a law library clerk. Absent such evidence, petitioner did not meet his burden of demonstrating that the determination of the Central Office Review Committee was either irrational or arbitrary and capricious (see *Matter of Abreu v Fischer,*87 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2011]; *Matter of Lopez v Fischer,*83 AD3d 1230, 1231 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 709 [2011]).

We have reviewed petitioner’s challenge to the denial of his motion for reconsideration and find it to be without merit.

Peters, PJ., Lahtinen, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgments are affirmed, without costs.

*

 The effect of earning LCTAs rendered those inmates eligible for conditional release or parole consideration six months earlier them they would have been otherwise *(see*Correction Law § 803-b [1] [b] [i], [ii] [A]).
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1131 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1131

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
                            research credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

   Mr. Mack introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
                            research credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF RESEARCH CREDIT.

    (a) Credit Made Permanent.--
            (1) In general.--Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 (relating to credit for increasing research activities) is 
        amended by striking subsection (h).
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Paragraph (1) of section 45C(b) 
        of such Code is amended by striking subparagraph (D).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred after June 30, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
** **

**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION****OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Edward C. English,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

Date: August 4, 2006
| /s/ Edward C. English   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Edward C. English       |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

                                                

----
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
  /s/ ANDREW HAMERAndrew HamerVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Keynote
Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request