alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State of Connecticut *v.*James Kristy

Decided March 28, 1990

*Susann E. Gill,*assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

*Timothy H. Everett,*in opposition.

The defendant state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 495, is denied.
Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:323

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 2 of 15 PageID #:324

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 3 of 15 PageID #:325

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 4 of 15 PageID #:326

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 5 of 15 PageID #:327

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 6 of 15 PageID #:328

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 7 of 15 PageID #:329

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 8 of 15 PageID #:330

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 9 of 15 PageID #:331

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 10 of 15 PageID #:332

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 11 of 15 PageID #:333

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 12 of 15 PageID #:334

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 13 of 15 PageID #:335

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 14 of 15 PageID #:336

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 79  Filed: 01/22/03 Page 15 of 15 PageID #:337
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (5)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (5)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (5)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 345/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 345 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 571 December 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 345

English edition

Legislation

Volume 571 December 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2014/857/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 1 December 2014 concerning the notification of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of its wish to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis which are contained in acts of the Union in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and amending Decisions 2000/365/EC and 2004/926/EC | 1 |
| | | 2014/858/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 1 December 2014 on the notification by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of its wish to participate in acts of the Union in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters adopted before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and which are not part of the Schengen acquis | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2014/857/EU

*

Council Decision of 1 December 2014 concerning the notification of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of its wish to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis which are contained in acts of the Union in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and amending Decisions 2000/365/EC and 2004/926/EC

acquis

1

2014/858/EU

*

Commission Decision of 1 December 2014 on the notification by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of its wish to participate in acts of the Union in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters adopted before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and which are not part of the Schengen acquis

acquis

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian W. Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    BRIAN W.
DUNHAM               
|Brian W. Dunham                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2009
#### In the Matter of Damion Gardner, Appellant, v Susan Gardner, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 880]

— In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ross, J.H.O.), dated August 15, 2011, which, after a hearing, denied his petition, in effect, to vacate an order of protection of the same court, dated January 13, 2011, and dismissed the proceeding. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the appellant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*
      *1058(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 1 of 34 PageID #:592
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 2 of 34 PageID #:593
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 3 of 34 PageID #:594
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 4 of 34 PageID #:595
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 5 of 34 PageID #:596
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 6 of 34 PageID #:597
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 7 of 34 PageID #:598
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 8 of 34 PageID #:599
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 9 of 34 PageID #:600
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 10 of 34 PageID #:601
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 11 of 34 PageID #:602
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 12 of 34 PageID #:603
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 13 of 34 PageID #:604
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 14 of 34 PageID #:605
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 15 of 34 PageID #:606
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 16 of 34 PageID #:607
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 17 of 34 PageID #:608
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 18 of 34 PageID #:609
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 19 of 34 PageID #:610
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 20 of 34 PageID #:611
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 21 of 34 PageID #:612
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 22 of 34 PageID #:613
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 23 of 34 PageID #:614
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 24 of 34 PageID #:615
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 25 of 34 PageID #:616
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 26 of 34 PageID #:617
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 27 of 34 PageID #:618
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 28 of 34 PageID #:619
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 29 of 34 PageID #:620
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 30 of 34 PageID #:621
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 31 of 34 PageID #:622
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 32 of 34 PageID #:623
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 33 of 34 PageID #:624
Case: 1:02-cv-07266 Document #: 97 Filed: 03/27/06 Page 34 of 34 PageID #:625
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           374,320
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 377,720
<CASH>                                           4,456
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           7,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 415,301
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 31,280
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             23,352
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           262
<OTHER-SE>                                     349,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   415,301
<PREMIUMS>                                      92,329
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             18,607
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,167
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      30,272
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     10,520
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            14,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,668
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,759
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,759
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  18,730
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             29,196
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                1,076
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               4,537
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                13,185
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 31,280
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Robert T. Knight et al., Respondents, v Stanley P. Amelkin et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington, Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington denying petitioners’ application for a variance to expand and to alter a certain building, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of *630the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.), dated October 31, 1984, as granted the petition to the extent of annulling so much of the determination as denied petitioners "the right to convert the present use as a furniture store to other uses permitted within the C-6 General Business District”.

Judgment reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, determination confirmed and petition dismissed in its entirety.

A concern for adequate parking facilities to alleviate traffic congestion is a legitimate purpose for a zoning ordinance *(Matter of Overhill Bldg. Co. v Delany,*28 NY2d 449; *Matter of Ballroom Prods, v Abrams,*86 AD2d 661, *Iv denied*57 NY2d 601). Therefore, a decision to deny an application for a variance of an off-street parking regulation may only be considered arbitrary "if the hardship caused deprives the property owner of any use of the property to which it is reasonably adapted” *(Matter of Overhill Bldg. Co. v Delany, supra,*at p 457). This standard has not been met by petitioners at bar, where they only offered conclusory testimony unsupported by "dollars and cents” evidence *(see, Matter of Village Bd. v Jarrold,*53 NY2d 254, 255). Therefore, it cannot be said that appellants’ determination was arbitrary. In addition, the conclusion that a variance would result in increased traffic and congestion is supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Having found that the Zoning Board’s determination has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence, that determination is confirmed in its entirety *(see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley,*45 NY2d 441). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
II

Calendar No. 126

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1000

To designate the United States courthouse at 500 State Avenue in Kansas

City, Kansas, as the ‘‘Robert J. Dole United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 10, 1997

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. WARNER, Mr.

KEMPTHORNE, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. THOMMAS, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. REID, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

JULY 24, 1997

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse at 500 State

Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, as the ‘‘Robert J. Dole

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1000 RS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT J. DOLE UNITED

2 STATES COURTHOUSE.

3 The United States courthouse at 500 State Avenue

4 in Kansas City, Kansas, shall be known and designated

5 as the ‘‘Robert J. Dole United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert J. Dole United States

11 Courthouse’’.

Calendar No. 126

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1000

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse at 500

‘‘Robert J. Dole United States Courthouse’’.State Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, as the

JULY 24, 1997

Reported without amendment
# L_2004353EN.01002301.xml

| 27.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 353/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 353/23

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1277/2004 of 12 July 2004 amending for the 37th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 241 of 13 July 2004
  )

Official Journal of the European Union L 241 of 13 July 2004

On page 13, in point (2), under (a):

for:

‘Abulaziz’,

read:

‘Abdulaziz’.

---
The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chi ef Judge, United States District Court for 1 the Southern District of Iowa.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1471

___________ Henry M. Zeidan, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Lawrence Jacobson, Dr., or the Current * Southern District of Iowa. Dean of School of Osteopathic * Medicine and Health Sciences, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 6, 1998 Filed: July 13, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Henry M. Zeidan appeals from the district court & s adverse grant of summary 1 judg ment in this diversity action. Zeidan claimed defendants wrongfully retaine d student loan money and denied him the opportunity to continue his medical education. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties & briefs, we conclude the district-2-

court & s judgment was correct. Accordingly , we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B. Zeidan & s motions for a jury hearing and a preliminary hearing are denied. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-51165 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS LAGUNAS-SANCHEZ, also known as Raefel Rodriguez-Orosco, also known as Rafael Orosco, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-03-CR-210-ALL-OG

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Carlos Lagunas-Sanchez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Lagunas-Sanchez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should haveNo. 03-51165 -2- been alleged in his indictment. Lagunas-Sanchez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Lagunas-Sanchez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 1 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 2 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 3 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 4 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 5 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 6 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 7 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 8 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 9 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 10 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 11 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 12 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 13 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 14 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 15 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 16 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 17 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 18 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 19 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 20 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 21 of 22
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-2 Filed 02/10/09 Page 22 of 22