alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

dismissed

NO. 11-0024

IN THE MATTER OF THE

MARRIAGE OF J.B. AND H.B.

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

June 19, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, dismissed.

September 11, 2015

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

(Justice Debra H. Lehrmann not sitting)



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF J.B.

AND H.B., pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 11th day of September, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,075

EX PARTE GREGORY JERMAINE WHEELER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 114-0863-06-A IN THE 114TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Wheeler v. State, No. 12-07-00080-CR, (Tex. App. — Tyler, 2008, no pet.) (not designated for

publication). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of
2

his right to petition for discretionary review pro se.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. The record shows that appellate

counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise

him of his right to petition for discretionary appeal pro se. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997). The trial court recommends that relief be granted. We find that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of

the Twelfth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 12-07-00080-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case

No. 114-0863-06-A from the 114th Judicial District Court of Smith County. Applicant shall file his

petition for discretionary review with the Twelfth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on

which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: January 28, 2009

Do not publish
#### In the Matter of David J. Lee, Appellant, v Breanna Harris, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 713]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Carter, J.), entered March 9, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
Abatement Order filed April 4, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00113-CR

NO. 14-19-00116-CR

____________

RAUL AARON TADEO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1522508 and 1522474

ABATEMENT ORDER

The trial court, the Hon. Vanessa Velasquez, presiding, did not submit 

findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement. 

Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires the trial 

court to make written fact findings and conclusions of law as to whether a challenged 

statement was made voluntarily, even if appellant did not request them or object to 

their absence. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.22 § 6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 
142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to 

correct the error is to abate the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required 

findings and conclusions. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 

779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987). 

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact 

and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this 

Court on or before May 3, 2019.

The appeals are abated, treated as closed cases, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeals will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeals filed by either party. 

PER CURIAM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Acevedo, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered April 21, 1977, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court erred in refusing his request to instruct the jury as to the defense of justification. We disagree. In determining whether a justification charge is warranted, the evidence at trial must be viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant, and if that evidence sufficiently supports the asserted defense the court should instruct the jury as to that defense and must do so upon request *(People v Watts,*57 NY2d 299, 301; *People v Ruiz,*96 AD2d 845). However, when no reasonable view of the evidence would *814support a finding of justification, then the court is under no obligation to submit the question to the jury *(People v Watts, supra; People v Alston,*104 AD2d 653, 654). The trial court correctly determined that there was in fact no reasonable view of the evidence to support the defendant’s claim that he was justified in shooting Carlos Bonilla four times.

After the trial had commenced, the defendant jumped bail and fled the jurisdiction. The trial was thereafter continued in his absence, with the court correctly instructing the jury with respect to the defendant’s failure to appear. The defendant now maintains that he did not receive sufficient warning that the trial would continue in his absence if he did not appear on the scheduled dates. Without regard to trial counsel’s failure to object to continuation of the trial in his client’s absence, we note that the Court of Appeals has in any event foreclosed a claim of this nature *(see, People v Sanchez,*65 NY2d 436, 443-444). We have reviewed the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHOICETEL
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             285
<SECURITIES>                                       637
<RECEIVABLES>                                      838
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,743
<PP&E>                                           6,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,727)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,375
<SALES>                                          1,984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,984
<CGS>                                              932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     87
<INCOME-TAX>                                        35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 52
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        52
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:351
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 2 of 24 PageID #:352
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 3 of 24 PageID #:353
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 4 of 24 PageID #:354
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 5 of 24 PageID #:355
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 6 of 24 PageID #:356
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 7 of 24 PageID #:357
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 8 of 24 PageID #:358
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 9 of 24 PageID #:359
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 10 of 24 PageID #:360
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 11 of 24 PageID #:361
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 12 of 24 PageID #:362
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 13 of 24 PageID #:363
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 14 of 24 PageID #:364
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 15 of 24 PageID #:365
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 16 of 24 PageID #:366
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 17 of 24 PageID #:367
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 18 of 24 PageID #:368
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 19 of 24 PageID #:369
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 20 of 24 PageID #:370
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 21 of 24 PageID #:371
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 22 of 24 PageID #:372
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 23 of 24 PageID #:373
Case: 1:00-cv-07394 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/19/01 Page 24 of 24 PageID #:374
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1157 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1157

 Disapproving the cancellations transmitted by the President on August 
                 11, 1997, regarding Public Law 105-34.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 1997

   Mr. Craig introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Finance for seven days of session pursuant 
                  to section 1023 of Public Law 93-344

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Disapproving the cancellations transmitted by the President on August 
                 11, 1997, regarding Public Law 105-34.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 
disapproves of cancellations 97-1 and 97-2 as transmitted by the 
President in a special message on August 11, 1997, regarding Public Law 
105-34.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 70/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 70 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6426 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 70

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6426 February 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2021/C 70/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1 | 1 |
| 2021/C 70/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1 | 7 |
| 2021/C 70/03 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Banking Authority (EBA) for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1 | 10 |
| 2021/C 70/04 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2 | 15 |
| 2021/C 70/05 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 3 | 19 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2021/C 70/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1

1

2021/C 70/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1

7

2021/C 70/03

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Banking Authority (EBA) for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1

10

2021/C 70/04

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2

15

2021/C 70/05

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 3

19

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2020 ( OJ C 107, 31.3.2020 ) | 22 |
| | Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2 ( OJ C 11, 11.1.2021 ) | 23 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2020 ( OJ C 107, 31.3.2020 )

( OJ C 107, 31.3.2020 )

22

Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2 ( OJ C 11, 11.1.2021 )

( OJ C 11, 11.1.2021 )

23

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soil and Water Management Research: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Soil and Water Management Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Biochar
- ARS News Articles
- Research Projects
- Presentations

Kurt A Spokas
                     

                     Soil Scientist


                     Phone: (612) 626-2834
                     
                     

                     Fax: (651) 649-5175
                     Room S531

                     UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA                           
                     1991 UPPER BUFORD CIRCLE                          
                     

                     SAINT PAUL                    , MN 55108-602


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# L_2013164EN.01S00301.xml

| 18.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         101,135
<SECURITIES>                                     5,635
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                      6,251
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,852
<PP&E>                                           8,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,856)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,543
<SALES>                                         36,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,106
<CGS>                                           17,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,214
<INCOME-TAX>                                       907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,307
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of
Logitech International S.A. (the Company) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code.

Gerald P. Quindlen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark J. Hawkins, the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each certify that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|August 5, 2008         
|                       
|/s/ Gerald P. Quindlen 
|Gerald P. Quindlen     
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ Mark J. Hawkins    
|Mark J. Hawkins        
|Chief Financial Officer
#### COSGROVE, Respondent, v. MURPHY CONST. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department,

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Edward J. Cosgrove, as administrator, etc., of Thomas Cosgrove, deceased, against the Murphy Construction Company.

No opinion, Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Case 1:03-cr-00978 Document 973 Filed 07/19/07 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:03-cr-00978 Document 973 Filed 07/19/07 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:03-cr-00978 Document 973 Filed 07/19/07 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:03-cr-00978 Document 973 Filed 07/19/07 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:03-cr-00978 Document 973 Filed 07/19/07 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:03-cr-00978 Document 973 Filed 07/19/07 Page 6 of 6