alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Reeva Aronowich-Culhane, Appellant, v Angelique Fournier, Respondent.

[943 NYS2d 174]

In related *1115custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the paternal grandmother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Valme-Lundy, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated June 3, 2011, which, without a hearing, dismissed her petition to modify the custody provisions of an order of custody and visitation of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kiesel, J.), dated April 30, 2009, so as to award her sole custody of the subject children.

Ordered that the order dated June 3, 2011, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

“Modification of an existing custody arrangement is permissible only upon a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is necessary to ensure the best interests of the child” *(Matter of Strand-O’Shea v O’Shea,*32 AD3d 398, 398 [2006]; *see Matter of Fitje v Fitje,*87 AD3d 599, 600 [2011]; *Matter of Deochand v Deochand,*80 AD3d 609, 610 [2011]; *Matter of Mazurkiewicz v Pindor-Mazurkiewicz,*80 AD3d 615, 616 [2011]). “A party seeking such a modification is not automatically entitled to a hearing on the application, but first must make an evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant a hearing” *(Matter of Fitje v Fitje,*87 AD3d at 600; *see Matter of Deochand v Deochand,*80 AD3d at 610; *Matter of Mazzola v Lee,*76 AD3d 531 [2010]; *Matter of Grassi v Grassi,*28 AD3d 482 [2006]; *Matter of Carpenter v Whitaker,*5 AD3d 681 [2004]). Here, the conclusory, unsubstantiated, and nonspecific allegations set forth in the paternal grandmother’s petition failed to meet this standard, and the Family Court properly dismissed the petition without a hearing *(see Matter of Fitje v Fitje,*87 AD3d at 600; *Matter of Deochand v Deochand,*80 AD3d at 610; *Matter of Grant v Hunter,*64 AD3d 779 [2009]; *Matter of Blackstock v Price,*51 AD3d 914, 915 [2008]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Fields, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 566]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), rendered February 25, 2011, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to *777withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see *Anders v Califor*nia, 386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   /s/                Daniel R. Baty |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel                R. Baty                 |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer        |
|   | March                16, 2006                 |
# CA2009103EN.01S00301.xml

| 5.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 103/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 103/s3

---

REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 9 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | (IT) |
| 12 | (DE/FR) |
| 13 | |
| 14 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 16 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 17 | (BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO) |
| 20 | |
| 21 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 23 | |
| 24 | (DE/FR/NL) |
| 25 | (BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO) |
| 28 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 34 | (FR) |
| 36 | (GA/EN) |
| 37 | |
| 38 | |
| 39 | (SV) |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | (EN) |
| 45 | |
| 46 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 47 | |
| 52 | (DA/FI/MT) |
| 58 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 59 | (DE/EN/ES/FR/PT/SV) |
| 62 | (BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 63 | |
| 70 | |
| 71 | |
| 75 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 80 | (FR) |
| 84 | (BG/RO) |
| 86 | |
| 91 | |
| 93 | (BG/RO) |
| 94 | |
| 95 | |
| 97 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 98 | |
| 99 | (GA/EN) |
| 103 | |

9

(DE/EN/FR)

10

(IT)

12

(DE/FR)

13

14

(DE/EN/FR)

16

(DE/EN/FR)

17

(BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO)

20

21

(DE/EN/FR)

23

24

(DE/FR/NL)

25

(BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO)

28

(DE/EN/FR)

34

(FR)

36

(GA/EN)

37

38

39

(SV)

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

(EN)

45

46

(DE/EN/FR)

47

52

(DA/FI/MT)

58

(DE/EN/FR)

59

(DE/EN/ES/FR/PT/SV)

62

(BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK)

63

70

71

75

(DE/EN/FR)

80

(FR)

84

(BG/RO)

86

91

93

(BG/RO)

94

95

97

(DE/EN/FR)

98

99

(GA/EN)

103

---
734 A.2d 1289

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Robert Brian KREINER, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 3, 1999.

Decided Sept. 9, 1999.

Joseph C. Madenspacher, Dist. Atty., Susan E. Moyer, Asst. Dist. Atty., District Attorney’s Office, for Com.

James J. Karl, Public Defender, Merrill M. Spagn, Asst. Public Defender, Public Defender’s Office, for Robert Kreiner.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas dated July 27, 1998, insofar as it is consistent with our disposition in *Williams*and we reverse its order insofar as it is inconsistent with the same. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the Superior Court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oscar Mercado, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 753] —

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 8, 2010 *(People v Mercado,*74 AD3d 990 [2010], *cert denied*562 US —, 131 S Ct 1485 [2011]), affirming a resentence of the County Court, Westchester County, imposed July 24, 2008.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz, 2*NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, A.P.J., Dickerson, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), James W. Benson, Chief Executive
Officer of SpaceDev, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of
their knowledge:

         The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
"Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
this 14th day of August 2002.



                                            /S/ James W. Benson
                                            --------------------------
                                            James W. Benson
                                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1120 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1120

       To provide for a consultant for the President pro tempore.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

 Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To provide for a consultant for the President pro tempore.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 101(a) of 
the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1977 (2 U.S.C. 61h-6(a)) is 
amended by inserting after the first sentence the following: ``The 
President pro tempore of the Senate is authorized to appoint and fix 
the compensation of 1 consultant, on a temporary or intermittent basis, 
at a daily rate of compensation not in excess of that specified in the 
first sentence of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.21
                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$250,000.00                                          North Hollywood, California

         Sixty (60) days after written demand, THE THAXTON GROUP, INC.("Maker"),
promises to pay to the order of KRAMER-WILSON COMPANY INSURANCE SERVICES, a
California corporation ("Payee"), at its offices located at 12200 Sylvan Street,
North Hollywood, California, or at such other address as Payee may from time to
time designate, the principal sum of Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand and no/100
Dollars ($250,000), with interest thereon commencing on the date of this Note
and continuing until all sums are paid in full.

         Maker agrees to pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of two
per cent (2%) above the most recently published reference rate of Bank of
America, N.T.&S.A. as of the date of this Note. On each interest due date
specified in the immediately succeeding paragraph, the rate of interest on this
Note shall be adjusted to that rate which is two per cent (2%) above the then
most recently published reference rate of Bank of America, N.T.&S.A. as of such
interest due date. Upon adjustment, such rate shall continue until the next
interest adjustment date.

         All accrued interest shall be due on the first day of each month while
any portion of the principal balance of this Note shall remain unpaid. Interest
payments shall commence on September 1, 1996. Principal and interest are payable
in lawful money of the United States. All payments received shall be credited
first to interest due, balance to principal.

         If any payment or interest or principal is not made within ten (10)
days of when due, then there shall be immediately due and payable from Maker to
Payee a late charge in the amount of ten per cent (10%) of the amount not timely
paid, which amount shall be owing whether or not Payee shall exercise any right
to accelerate this Note or exercise any other remedy. In addition, if any
payment of interest or principal is not made within ten (10) days of when due,
Payee shall have the right and option to declare the entire principal sum and
all accrued interest immediately due and payable.

         Maker waives presentment, protest and demand, notice of protest, demand
and dishonor and nonpayment and agrees the due date of this Note or any
installment may be extended without affecting any liability hereunder, and
further promises to pay all reasonable cost and expenses, including attorney's
fees, incurred by Payee in connection with any default or in any proceeding to
enforce any provision of this Note or any instrument by which it is secured.

                  MAKER

                  /S/ JAMES D. THAXTON                          August 6, 1996
                  --------------------                                 --
                  James D. Thaxton, President
                  The Thaxton Group, Inc.


                                       33
<PAGE>
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 1 of 34 PageID #:1
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 2 of 34 PageID #:2
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 3 of 34 PageID #:3
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 4 of 34 PageID #:4
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 5 of 34 PageID #:5
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 6 of 34 PageID #:6
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 7 of 34 PageID #:7
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 8 of 34 PageID #:8
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 9 of 34 PageID #:9
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 10 of 34 PageID #:10
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 11 of 34 PageID #:11
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 12 of 34 PageID #:12
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 13 of 34 PageID #:13
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 14 of 34 PageID #:14
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 15 of 34 PageID #:15
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 16 of 34 PageID #:16
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 17 of 34 PageID #:17
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 18 of 34 PageID #:18
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 19 of 34 PageID #:19
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 20 of 34 PageID #:20
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 21 of 34 PageID #:21
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 22 of 34 PageID #:22
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 23 of 34 PageID #:23
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 24 of 34 PageID #:24
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 25 of 34 PageID #:25
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 26 of 34 PageID #:26
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 27 of 34 PageID #:27
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 28 of 34 PageID #:28
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 29 of 34 PageID #:29
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 30 of 34 PageID #:30
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 31 of 34 PageID #:31
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 32 of 34 PageID #:32
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 33 of 34 PageID #:33
Case: 1:03-cv-04433 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/03 Page 34 of 34 PageID #:34
Exhibit 10.53

                       Atlantic Technology Ventures, Inc.
                            150 Broadway, Suite 1009
                            New York, New York 10038


                                                     January 25, 2001

BH Capital Investments, L.P.
175 Bloor Street East
South Tower, 7th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M4W 3R8

Excalibur Limited Partnership
33 Prince Arthur Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5R IB2

Sirs:

         It is our understanding that (1) you acknowledge that in item (10) of
the definition of "Repurchase Event" in the Convertible Preferred Stock and
Warrants Purchase Agreement dated September 28, 2000, between Atlantic
Technology Ventures, Inc. ("Atlantic") and the Investors, as amended (the
"Purchase Agreement"), all references to "the Company" should be to Optex
Ophthalmologics, Inc., the majority-owned subsidiary of Atlantic, and (2) that
you waive any Repurchase Event that may be caused by occurrence of the event
referenced in item (12) of the definition of Repurchase Event in the Purchase
Agreement. To confirm that our understanding is correct, please sign a copy of
this letter in the space provided below and send a copy by facsimile to Atlantic
at (212) 267-2159.

                                          Sincerely yours,

                                          ATLANTIC TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, INC.


                                          By: /s/ Frederic P. Zotos
                                             --------------------------
                                             Frederic P. Zotos
                                             President

Agreed to on January 25, 2001:

BH CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, L.P.              Excalibur Limited Partnership
By:  HB and Co., Inc., its                By: Excalibur Capital Management, Inc.
     General Partner


     By:  /s/ Henry Brachfeld             By: /s/ William Hechter
          -------------------                -------------------
          Henry Brachfeld                    William Hechter
          President                          President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      20,178,391
<SECURITIES>                                52,250,534
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            75,268,316
<PP&E>                                      16,206,320
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,088,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             106,089,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,822,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       180,631
<OTHER-SE>                                  92,521,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               106,089,066
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,448,877
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,847,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,937,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             485,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (42,449,420)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (42,449,420)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (42,449,420)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.50)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

t0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145214

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145214

COA: 307787 

Mackinac CC: 2010-003313-FC

SHANE MICHAEL CALVEY, Chippewa CC: 10-000431-FC

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Soil Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Carl P. Ranno, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Ken
Lew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno                                /s/ Ken Lew
-------------------------------                  ----------------------------
Carl P. Ranno,                                   Ken Lew,
Chief Executive Officer and President            Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2003                                November 10, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,066,665
<SECURITIES>                                    99,768
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,313,519
<ALLOWANCES>                                   725,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,071,671
<PP&E>                                         684,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,132,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,343,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,132,346
<SALES>                                     54,496,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            84,496,848
<CGS>                                       51,213,977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,582,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,782
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             144,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                731,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                   266,065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            465,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   465,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>