alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southwest Watershed Research Center: Tucson, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About SWRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Tucson, Arizona SWRC Docs





- USDA-ARS Pacific West Area Remote Sensing Workshop
- 5th Interagency Surface Dynamics Working Group Meeting
- Cooperative Research
- JFSP Workshop
- Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds
- Research Insights in Semiarid Ecosystems

Cooperative Researchheadline bar  U.S. DOD - Fort Carson Military ReservationU.S. EPANASA**International Cooperation**MexicoAustrailiaNew Zealand


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
1190, 196 P.3d 465, 477 (2008). Silvey failed to provide this court with the

guilt-phase transcripts of the 6-day trial, see Thomas v. State, 120 Nev. 37, 43 & n.4, 83 P.3d 818, 822 & n.4 (2004) ("Appellant has the ultimate responsibility to provide this court with 'portions of the record essential to determination of issues raised in appellant's appeal." (quoting NRAP 30(b)(3))), and therefore is unable to demonstrate that she is entitled to relief, see Green v. State, 119 Nev. 542, 545, 80 P.3d 93, 95 (2003) (when reviewing for plain error, "the burden is on the defendant to show actual prejudice or a miscarriage of justice"). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Law Office of Gemma Greene Waldron, PLLC Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk J.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4205

___________

Bobby Mobley, *

 Plaintiff-Appellant, *

 v. *

City of Town and Country, a municipal * Appeal from the United States

corporation; John Copeland, * District Court for the

individually and in his capacity as a * Eastern District of Missouri.

high-ranking supervisory employee of *

the City of Town and Country’s police * [UNPUBLISHED]

department; Salvadore Del Mar, *

individually and in his official capacity *

as the Chief of Police for the City of *

Town and Country; James Robinson, *

individually and in his official capacity *

as the City Administrator for the City *

of Town and Country, *

 Defendants-Appellees.

*

*

*

___________

Submitted: May 13, 1998

Filed: June 2, 1998

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
The Honorable George F. Gunn, United States District Judge for the Eastern

1

District of Missouri.

-2-

Bobby Mobley filed this action alleging that his demotion was a retaliatory

employment action in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §

12101 et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and also

brought state law claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act, R.S.Mo. § 213.010,

and for wrongful termination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The

district court granted summary judgment on the federal claims, finding that Mobley

1

had not engaged in a protected activity under the ADA, West v. Marion Merell Dow,

Inc., 54 F.3d 493, 496-97 (8th Cir. 1995), and was not a member of a protected class

under Title VII, Barge v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 87 F.3d 256, 258 (8th Cir. 1996), and

declined jurisdiction over the state law claims. After fully reviewing the record, we

find no error in the judgment of the district court and affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

ATTEST:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Barbara Sehnert et al., Respondents-Appellants, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Defendants, City of New York, Respondent, and Broadway Tenth Property LLC et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[942 NYS2d 871]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stall-man, J.), entered January 24, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs’ motion for sum*464mary judgment on the issue of liability as against defendant City of New York, denied defendants Broadway Tenth Property LLC’s and Ernest Realty Associates, LLC’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, and granted the City’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff Barbara Sehnert allegedly sustained injuries after exiting a bus and tripping and falling over a piece of metal protruding from the sidewalk. Plaintiffs contend that the piece of metal was a broken signpost that the City installed and removed. However, as they concede, they submitted no evidence that established that the piece of metal was a sign or signpost installed or removed by the City and thus failed to show that the City caused or created the alleged sidewalk defect. Nor did they show that the City had prior written notice of the alleged defect *(see*Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c] [2]).

Defendants Broadway Tenth and Ernest Realty, as the owners of property abutting the public sidewalk, may be held liable in negligence for injuries resulting from sidewalk defects *(see*Administrative Code § 7-210 [a]; § 19-101 [d]; *Early v Hilton Hotels Corp.,*73 AD3d 559 [2010]; *Lockard v Sopolsky,*82 AD3d 657 [2011]). The cases on which defendants rely in support of their argument to the contrary involve accidents that occurred before September 2003, the effective date of Administrative Code § 7-210 (a) *(see Early,*73 AD3d at 560). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Violette K., an Infant. Steuben County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Sheila E.K., Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 519]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Joseph W. Latham, J), entered July 27, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, placed the subject child in the custody of petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, respondent mother appeals from an order, entered upon her consent without admission, in which Family Court, inter alia, placed the subject child in petitioner’s custody upon a finding that the mother neglected the child. The appeal must be dismissed. A party may not appeal from an order entered upon that party’s consent *(see Matter of Selena O. [Trisha O.*—Steven *R.],*84 AD3d 1648 [2011]; *Matter of Bambi C.,*238 AD2d 942, 942-943 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 805 [1997]). Moreover, because the mother never moved to withdraw her consent to the entry of an order of fact-finding of neglect without admission, her contention that her consent was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent is also not properly before us *(see Matter of Julia R.,*52 AD3d 1310, 1311 [2008], *lv denied*11 NY3d 709 [2008]; *cf. Matter of Gabriella R. [Mindyn S.],*68 AD3d 1487, 1487 [2009], *lv dismissed*14 NY3d 812 [2010]).

We reject the mother’s further contention that her attorney was ineffective in failing to move to withdraw her consent to the entry of the neglect order. The mother “neither alleged nor demonstrated that [she] was actually prejudiced by any of counsel’s shortcomings. [Her] contention that counsel was ineffective ‘is impermissibly based on speculation’ ” *(Matter of Michael C.,*82 AD3d 1651, 1652 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 704 [2011]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Fahey, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN FAULKNER, on behalf of himself

and all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-17124

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00968-JSW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2015** 

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

John Faulkner appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to amend his

complaint following a previous remand. Faulkner v. ADT Sec. Servs., Inc., 706

F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm.

FILED

DEC 11 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying leave to amend as

futile. The newly alleged claim does not relate back to the original complaint

under Rule 15(c)(1)(B) because it arises out of a different series of phone calls than

the calls alleged in the original complaint. See Oja v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs,

440 F.3d 1122, 1134-35 (9th Cir. 2006) (holding that a Privacy Act claim premised

on a different disclosure of personal information did not relate back to the original

complaint). As the district court correctly ruled, amendment would be futile

because the new claim would be barred by the statue of limitations. Deutsch v.

Turner Corp., 324 F.3d 692, 718 n.20 (9th Cir. 2003) (amendment is futile if the

claim will be barred by the statute of limitations). 

AFFIRMED. 

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2099

BRAD R. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HORRY, COUNTY OF, State of South Carolina; HUBERT MISHOE; 

JANET CARTER; JOHN WEAVER; TAMMY BARNHILL; BRENDA L. GORSKI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. J. Michelle Childs, District 

Judge. (4:09-cv-01758-JMC)

Submitted: February 5, 2013 Decided: February 12, 2013

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brad R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Scott Kozacki, 

WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brad R. Johnson appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting 

summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his complaint. 

We have considered Johnson’s arguments on appeal, reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. County of 

Horry, No. 4:09-cv-01758-JMC (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2012). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Introduction Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Main Menu
                        Home page
                                    About the Plant Introduction Station
                                    Crops
                                    Entomology
                                    Facilities
                                    Pathology
                                    Seed Storage
                                    Seed Viability
                                    Annual Reports
                                    Ash Conservation ProjectSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa Plant Introduction Research People & Locations







Kathleen  Reitsma
                        Plant Introduction Research

                        




                        
                        RESEARCH SCIENTIST
                        Phone: (515) 294-3212
                        
                        
                        Fax: (515) 294-1903(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Order entered June 17, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00261
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.B. AND E.B., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 53861
- 2020

O RDER Appellant’s brief in this appeal was filed prematurely, before the filing of the clerk’s and reporter’s records. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6(a). Because the brief must
contain citations to t he record, we STRIKE appellant’s June 1, 2021 brief. See id.
38.1. We note the reporter’s record in this appeal has not been filed because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file, no later than June 2 8 , 2021, written verification he has paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record or is entitled to proceed without payment of costs under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure145. We caution appellant that failure to file the requ ested verification may result

in the appeal being submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c). The deadline for appellant’s brief shall be set by the Court once the issue concerning the reporter’s record has been resolved.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Application Technology Research: Wooster, OH
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Departments
                        Agricultural Engineering
                                    Entomology
                                    Horticulture
                                    Plant Pathology
                                    IR-4 programSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Wooster, Ohio Application Technology Research People & Locations







Janeen  Polen
                        Application Technology Research

                        




                        
                        Program Support Assistant (Office Automation)
                        Phone: (330) 988-4050
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                       278
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,340
<PP&E>                                         369,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 420,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,257
<BONDS>                                         40,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                     206,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   420,967
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,828
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,828
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    190
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
| 1.   | I      have reviewed the annual report and other reports containing distribution      information for the period covered by the annual  report; |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To      the best of my knowledge, no untrue statements of material fact exist in      these reports, and no material facts were  omitted. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Theses      reports include to the best of my knowledge,  the financial      information required to be provided to the trustee under the governing      documents of the issuer; and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The      Servicer is compliant with its servicing obligations and minimum servicing      standards except as detailed below. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | No      default in performance of any obligations has  occurred. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  July      1, 2009 |                        By/s/: | DAVID      L. DERFELT       |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                               |                                                                                                               | David      L. Derfelt       |
|                               |                                                                                                               | V.      P. & Controller |
|                               |                                                                                                               |                        |

----