alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM 6/30/99 UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          48,707
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,525)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,637
<PP&E>                                         264,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                (54,231)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,061,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,223
<BONDS>                                        762,469
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,989
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,921
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,061,927
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146,976
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,751
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (108,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (108,145)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.86)


</TABLE>
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1198

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide permanent

authority for entry into the United States of certain religious workers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 18, 1997

Mr. ABRAHAM (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. HATCH, Mr. LEAHY, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BIDEN, and Mr. D’AMATO) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide

permanent authority for entry into the United States

of certain religious workers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Workers Act

5 of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR ENTRY INTO UNITED

7 STATES OF CERTAIN RELIGIOUS WORKERS.

8 Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and

9 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended
2

•S 1198 IS

1 by striking ‘‘before October 1, 1997,’’ each of the two

2 places it appears.

Æ
#### Jomar Bakery Corp., Respondent, v Pergament United Sales, Inc., Doing Business as Pergament, Appellant.

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated October 22, 1984, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (c).

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term correctly concluded that issues of fact exist with regard to whether the plaintiff executed an agreement dated April 6, 1984, as the result of economic duress. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.2



                               SAVILLE SYSTEMS PLC
                       AMENDMENT TO 1995 SHARE OPTION PLAN


               Adopted by the Board of Directors on April 24, 1997

                 Approved by the Shareholders on April __, 1998


Section 4 as amended and  restated.  Section 4 of the 1995 Share  Option Plan of
Saville  Systems PLC shall be deleted in its entirety and the following shall be
substituted in its place:

4.       Stock Subject to the Plan.

         Subject to  adjustment  as  provided  in Section 15 below,  the maximum
number  of  Ordinary  Shares  which  may be  issued  and sold  under the Plan is
5,000,000  shares. If an option granted under the Plan shall expire or terminate
for any reason without having been  exercised in full,  the  unpurchased  shares
subject to such option shall again be available  for  subsequent  option  grants
under the Plan.  If shares  issued upon exercise of an option under the Plan are
tendered to the Company in payment of the  exercise  price of an option  granted
under the Plan,  such tendered  shares shall again be available  for  subsequent
option  grants under the Plan;  provided,  that in no event shall such shares be
made  available  for  issuance to  Reporting  Persons or pursuant to exercise of
Incentive Stock Options.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sontra Medical Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Harry G. Mitchell, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Harry G. Mitchell                                            
|Harry G. Mitchell Interim Chief Financial Officer August 11, 2006
#### In the Matter of Demitri Jones, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 674]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

A correction officer witnessed petitioner cut another inmate and cause a laceration to the inmate’s face. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting the inmate. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty and the determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of its author and the related documentation, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Jones v Fischer,*69 AD3d 1065, 1065-1066 [2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 707 [2011]; *Matter of Vassell v Goord,*26 AD3d 547, 547 [2006]). Although petitioner asserts that the misbehavior report was not properly endorsed, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the officer who detained him witnessed the incident or acquired personal knowledge of the facts. In view of this, the officer’s endorsement was not necessary, and petitioner has failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by its omission *(see*7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [b]; *Matter of Page v Fischer,*64 AD3d 1067, 1068 [2009]). Likewise, the record discloses that valid extensions were obtained to begin the hearing *(see*7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [a]) and that it was commenced and completed within the authorized time period *(see Matter of Cepeda v Goord,*39 AD3d 640, 641 [2007]; *Matter of Berry v Goord,*13 AD3d 947 [2004]). Finally, petitioner’s claim of hearing officer bias has not been preserved for our review due to his failure to raise it in his administrative appeal *(see Matter of Britt v Fischer,*54 AD3d 1087 [2008]; *Matter of Branch v Goord,*4 AD3d 699, 700 [2004]).

*1299Peters, PJ., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with this periodic report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  |    
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: April 23, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Alex C. Hui                 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Alex C. Hui Chief Executive
Officer
#### ZENNER et al. v. DEXTER.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.

December 26, 1895.)

Change oe Venue—Convenience.

Change of venue to the county in which occurred all the transactions on which the right to maintain replevin is based will be granted, it appearing that the witnesses will be principally residents of that county, and that their convenience requires the change.

Appeal from special term, Onondaga county.

Action by David Zenner and others against George W. Dexter. From an order denying a motion to change the place of trial from Onondaga county to the county of Chenango, on the ground of convenience, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before HARDIN, P. J., and MARTIN and MERWIN, JJ.

John W. Church, for appellant.

Wilson, Wells & Cobb," for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We think the order appealed from should be reversed. The action was replevin, to recover certain goods sold by the plaintiffs to the defendant’s grantor, and by the latter sold and transferred to the defendant. The original sale was by an agent of the plaintiffs, in the county of Chenango, and the goods were delivered there. The sale by the purchaser to the?‘defendant was also made in that county. The plaintiffs, by this action, seek to disaffirm the original sale and recover the goods, upon the ground that they were fraudulently obtained of them by the defendant’s grantor, and that he fraudulently transferred them to the defendant. It is rendered quite manifest from a reading of the papers contained in the appeal book that, on the trial, no serious question as to the sale and delivery of the goods by the plaintiffs to the defendant’s grantor will be raised. Obviously, the only issues to be *591tried in this case are: (1) Whether the defendant’s grantor fraudulently purchased the goods in question; and (2) whether the defendant was a purchaser of them in good faith. As the sale by the plaintiffs was made in Chenango county, if the purchaser was guilty of any fraud it was perpetrated there. Indeed, practically all the transactions between the parties to such sale took place in the county of Chenango. Again, all the transactions relating to the sale of the goods to the defendant occurred in Chenango county. It seems very improbable that any witnesses out of that county will be called upon the issue as to the good faith of the defendant’s purchase or as to the good faith of the original purchase. A careful examination of the papers contained in the appeal book has led us irresistibly to the conclusion that the witnesses that will be examined upon the trial of this case must and will consist principally of residents ■of Chenango "county, and that their convenience requires that the place of trial shall be changed to that county. We think the defendant was not guilty of any such laches as should defeat this motion. The delay was sufficiently explained by the affidavits used upon the motion.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs, to abide the event.
#### HAGGBLAD, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Catherina Haggblad, as administratrix, etc., of John Haggblad, deceased, against the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. See 102 N. Y. Supp. 1039. _
# C_2005215EN.01S00301.xml

| 2.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS — COM DOCUMENTS

NOTICE TO READERS — COM DOCUMENTS

Henceforth and from OJ C 211 of 30 August 2005, when titles of preparatory acts adopted by the Commission and COM Document other than preparatory acts are to be published in the Official Journal, the on-line version of the Official Journal accessible on EUR-Lex will contain the text in full.

Lex

A click on the document number (left-hand column ‘Documents’) will open the page of EUR-Lex containing the archive information you require concerning the COM Document you want.

Lex

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cotton Ginning Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Cotton Ginning Research People & Locations







Kenneth  Phillips
                        Cotton Ginning Research

                        




                        
                        Electrician
                        Phone: (662) 686-3109
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-49494) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the 1995 Equity
Incentive Plan, the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan,
and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-56654) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-77052) pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan
and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 14, 2002,
except for Note 14, as to which the date is March 25, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Transmeta Corporation included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
March 25, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Gary Stern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Asta Funding, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
 disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
 ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
 consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
 particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

December 13, 2004

/S/ Gary Stern
--------------
President and Chief Executive Officer



                                      -41-
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company for the periods presented therein.
  /s/ UMANG GUPTAUmang GuptaChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### WILHELM v. FULLER & WARREN CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division. Third Department.

September 26, 1907.)

Action by Walter Wilhelm against the Fuller & Warren Company.

No opinion. Motion denied.
ex_266092.htm


 


Exhibit 10.4


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	
			Amount of Loan:         $25,000

				
			June 29, 2021

			



 


 


For value received, KRYPTOBANK CO., a Delaware Corporation having offices at 407 Lincoln Road, Suite 701, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 (the “Borrower”), hereby unconditionally promises to pay $25,000 including 12% per annum interest to the order of BALANCE LABS, INC. a Delaware Corporation, having offices at 407 Lincoln Road, Ste 701, Miami Beach, Fl. 33139 (the “Lender”). Payments shall be made at Lender’s office aforesaid or at such other place as Lender shall from time to time designate to the Borrower in writing.


 


The full principal amount and interest of this Note shall be due in on June 28, 2022; or the date on which Borrower raises at least $200,000 from investors, whichever is sooner (the “Maturity Date”) Interest will accrue beginning on June 29, 2021.


 


Upon the failure by Borrower to tender the full payment to Lender on the Maturity Date, the entire principal amount of this Note shall upon notice from Lender to Borrower be immediately due and payable.


 


Any and all notices or other communications required or permitted to be given under any of the provisions of this Note shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when personally delivered or mailed by first class certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the parties at their current addresses (or at such other address as any party may specify by notice to all other parties given as aforesaid).


 


Borrower agrees that any legal suit, action, or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Note may be instituted in such New York State or Federal Court sitting in Miami-Dade County, Florida as Lender, in his sole discretion, may elect. TRIAL BY JURY IS EXPRESSLY WAIVED.


 


This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the State of Florida applicable to contracts made and to be performed therein.


 


This Note shall not be changed or terminated orally.


 


 


By:   /s/ Michael D. Farkas                                   


Name: Michael D. Farkas, Director