alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 34/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 34 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6228 January 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 34

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6228 January 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 34/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9017 — SK Capital Partners/Schenectady International Group) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2019/C 34/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9214 — MUFG HD/Akamai/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 34/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9017 — SK Capital Partners/Schenectady International Group) (
  1
  )

1

1

2019/C 34/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9214 — MUFG HD/Akamai/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 34/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2019/C 34/04 | Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
   (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2019/C 34/05 | Update of the list of residence permits referred to in Article 2(16) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 34/03

Euro exchange rates

2

2019/C 34/04

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
   (
  1
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)

1

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2019/C 34/05

Update of the list of residence permits referred to in Article 2(16) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2021242EN.01002602.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Intering and Others v Commission

(Case T-525/19) (1)

(Public contracts - Tendering procedure - Reduction of dust and nitrogen oxide emissions at the Kosovo B thermal power plant, Units B1 and B2 - Rejection of the application - Application for annulment submitted in the reply - New claims - Manifest inadmissibility - Amendment of the selection criteria during the procedure - Equal treatment)

(2021/C 242/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Intering Sh.p.k (Obiliq, Kosovo), Steinmüller Engineering GmbH (Gummersbach, Germany), Deling d.o.o. za proizvodnju, promet i usluge (Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina), ZM-Vikom d.o.o. za proizvodnju, konstrukcije i montažu (Šibenik, Croatia) (represented by: R. Spielhofen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà, B. Bertelmann and M. Kellerbauer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of (i) Commission Decision Ares(2019) 4979920 of 30 July 2019 not to accept the application of the applicants to participate in the restricted procedure for the award of the contract relating to the call for tenders EuropeAid/140043/DH/WKS/XK and (ii) of the decision of 18 October 2019 concerning the award of that contract.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 30 July 2019 (Ares(2019)4979920) not to accept the applications of Intering Sh.p.k, Steinmüller Engineering GmbH, Deling d.o.o. za proizvodnju, promet i usluge and ZM-Vikom d.o.o. za proizvodnju, konstrukcije i montažu to participate in the restricted procedure for the award of the contract relating to the call for tenders EuropeAid/140043/DH/WKS/XK; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 30 July 2019 (Ares(2019)4979920) not to accept the applications of Intering Sh.p.k, Steinmüller Engineering GmbH, Deling d.o.o. za proizvodnju, promet i usluge and ZM-Vikom d.o.o. za proizvodnju, konstrukcije i montažu to participate in the restricted procedure for the award of the contract relating to the call for tenders EuropeAid/140043/DH/WKS/XK;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           4,172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,008)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,235
<PP&E>                                          38,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,743)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (27,130)
<BONDS>                                      (134,200)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           (4)
<OTHER-SE>                                    (42,894)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (213,656)
<SALES>                                       (82,532)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (82,532)
<CGS>                                           36,993
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   354
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,045)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,045)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,445)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.52)
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 336A/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2011.336.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 336A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5417 November 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2011.336.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 336A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5417 November 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2011/C 336A/01 | Notice to readers concerning open competition EPSO/AST/117/11 — Assistants (AST 1) in the secretarial field | 1 |
| 2011/C 336A/02 | Notice of open competition EPSO/AST/117/11 | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2011/C 336A/01

Notice to readers concerning open competition EPSO/AST/117/11 — Assistants (AST 1) in the secretarial field

1

2011/C 336A/02

Notice of open competition EPSO/AST/117/11

5

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |
| 91 | |
| 98 | |
| 114 | (DA) |
| 121 | (DA) |
| 122 | |
| 135 | |
| 140 | (BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV) |
| 142 | |
| 146 | |
| 147 | (EN/IT/MT/SV) |
| 155 | (EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 162 | |
| 169 | (EN) |
| 177 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (BG/RO) |
| 181 | (DA) |
| 183 | (SL) |
| 185 | |
| 193 | (BG/RO) |
| 198 | (CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK) |
| 206 | (CS/ES/LV/MT/SV) |
| 208 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 221 | |
| 222 | (BG/RO) |
| 223 | |
| 229 | |
| 257 | |
| 258 | |
| 270 | |
| 271 | |
| 278 | (EN) |
| 279 | (FR) |
| 281 | (DA) |
| 284 | (DE) |
| 285 | (LT) |
| 286 | (NL) |
| 292 | (RO) |
| 294 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 303 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 304 | (DA/EN) |
| 307 | |
| 309 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 312 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 315 | |
| 321 | (EN/FR) |
| 324 | |
| 330 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 334 | |
| 336 | (EL/EN/ET/FI/FR/GA/HU/IT) |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

91

98

114

(DA)

121

(DA)

122

135

140

(BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV)

142

146

147

(EN/IT/MT/SV)

155

(EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

156

157

162

169

(EN)

177

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(BG/RO)

181

(DA)

183

(SL)

185

193

(BG/RO)

198

(CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK)

206

(CS/ES/LV/MT/SV)

208

(DE/EN/FR)

221

222

(BG/RO)

223

229

257

258

270

271

278

(EN)

279

(FR)

281

(DA)

284

(DE)

285

(LT)

286

(NL)

292

(RO)

294

(DE/EN/FR)

303

(DE/EN/FR)

304

(DA/EN)

307

309

(DE/EN/FR)

312

(DE/EN/FR)

315

321

(EN/FR)

324

330

(DE/EN/FR)

334

336

(EL/EN/ET/FI/FR/GA/HU/IT)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
911 F.2d 743

#### DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENTS SCHOOLS, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, Overseas Education Association, Intervenor.

Nos. 87-1733 to 87-1735 and 88-1004.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 22, 1990.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and ROBINSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On December 20, 1988, a panel of this Court granted the petitions of the Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DODDS) for review of an order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), set aside the FLRA’s decision on which the order was based, and denied the FLRA’s cross-petitions for enforcement of its order. *Department of Defense Dependents Schools v. FLRA,*863 F.2d 988 (D.C.Cir. 1988). At the suggestion of intervenor Overseas Education Association (OEA), this court granted rehearing *en banc*on February 6, 1989. On February 16, 1989 the Court *en banc,*on its own motion, ordered that all proceedings be held in abeyance pending the decision of the Supreme Court in *Fort Stewart Schools v. FLRA,*860 F.2d 396 (11th Cir.1988), *cert. granted,*— U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 47, 107 L.Ed.2d 16 (1989), where FLRA orders analogous to those at issue in the present case had been upheld and enforced.

On May 29, 1990, the Supreme Court affirmed the Eleventh Circuit’s decision. *Fort Stewart Schools,*— U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 2043, 109 L.Ed.2d 659 (1990). The FLRA and OEA subsequently filed motions with this Court requesting that the panel’s decision in this case be vacated and the orders under review be enforced without further proceedings. DODDS filed a response indicating that it did not oppose the motions.

Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court, that the judgment of this Court filed on December 20, 1988, is vacated, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court, that the petitions for review are denied and that the FLRA’s orders under review are hereby enforced.
EXHIBIT 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated February 2, 2001, included in New Horizon Kids Quest, Inc.'s Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000, into the Company's previously filed
Registration File Nos. 33-04384 and 333-49785.


                                   /s/ Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Co. P.L.L.P.
                                   BOULAY, HEUTMAKER, ZIBELL & CO. P.L.L.P.



Minneapolis, Minnesota,
   March 29, 2001
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6991** 
ANGELO HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. DENNIS PATTERSON; ANTHONY J. PADULA; JAMES C. DEAN; SHARON PATTERSON; OFFICER S. WILSON , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 6:11

- cv - 00853

- JMC )

Submitted : July 18, 2012 Decided: July 20, 2012

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Angelo Ham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Angelo B. Ham appeals the district court’s order dismissin g his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
. On appeal, Ham argues that the district court erred in concluding that he did not file objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. A review of the record reveals that Ham did file objections. However, although the district court made an erroneous finding of fact, such error does not require reversal here. United States v. Smith , 395 F.3d 516, 519 (4th Cir. 2005) (this court is “not limited to evaluation of the grounds offered by the district c ourt to support its decision, but may affirm on
any g rounds apparent from the record ” )
. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation correctly concluded that Ham failed to state a constitutional violation in his complaint because he did not articulate the denial of a liberty interest. The most specific description of the injury Ham suffered is that “multiple of his privileges and rights were taken for extended periods of time, consecutive
. ” (E.R. 6).
Ha m does not specify what privileges were taken away as a result of the disciplinary hearing. This vague reference to “loss of privileges” is insufficient to implicate a liberty interest and, thus, Ham does not sufficiently allege the denial of any constitu tional right. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of3 Ham’s complaint . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AF FIRMED
#### Jean Romanoff, Respondent, v Philip Romanoff, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), entered January 9, 1984, as, (1) granted the plaintiff wife pendente lite maintenance of $100 per week and child support of $100 per week, (2) directed him to pay realty taxes, water charges, heat and utility charges, homeowner insurance, basic telephone costs, and normal maintenance and repairs, on the marital residence, monthly payments on plaintiff’s car, medical coverage for plaintiff and the children and $750 for accounting fees and (3) granted the plaintiff exclusive possession of the marital residence. The appeal brings up for *159review so much of an order of the same court, entered February 28, 1984, as, upon granting defendant’s motion for reargument and modifying the order entered January 9, 1984, so as to deny that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for exclusive possession of the marital residence, adhered to the other portions of the original determination from which defendant has appealed.

Appeal from the order entered January 9, 1984, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order entered February 28, 1984, made upon reargument.

Order entered February 28, 1984, affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

Temporary maintenance is designed to insure that the needy spouse is provided with sufficient funds to meet reasonable needs pending trial and a speedy trial is generally the best remedy for perceived inequities in such awards *(see, e.g., Rossman v Rossman,*91 AD2d 1036; *Marcus v Marcus,*91 AD2d 991; *Jorgensen v Jorgensen,*86 AD2d 861). On the record before us, consisting of conflicting affidavits, we perceive no reason to substitute our discretion for that of Special Term. It considered all the relevant factors *(see, Stern v Stern,*106 AD2d 631; *Belfiglio v Belfiglio,*99 AD2d 462) and the award is not excessive *(Rossman v Rossman, supra; Pieri v Pieri,*91 AD2d 1016). Finally, plaintiff demonstrated the need for accounting services *(see, Ahern v Ahern,*94 AD2d 53). Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Con-nor and Rubin, JJ., concur.
#### Louretha KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Sandra Etters; Ronda Singletary; Deven Deal, Plaintiffs, v. Boyd BENNETT, Secretary, in his individual capacity; Alvin Keller, in his official capacity; Annie Harvey, Administrator, in her individual and official capacities; Timothy Kimble, Administrator, in his individual and official capacities; Unit Manager Moore, in his individual capacity; Unit Manager Ford, Assistant, in her *687individual capacity; Correctional Officer Wiggins, in his individual capacity; Correctional Officer Sims, in his official capacity; Nurse Barbosa, in his individual capacity; Lamar Blalock, Unit Manager, in his individual capacity; Jessica Jones, Correctional Officer, in her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-6515.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 25, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 30, 2011.

Louretha King, Appellant pro se. Joseph Finarelli, Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorneys General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Louretha King seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her claims in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action involving multiple parties. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order King seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1043 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1043

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 1997

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at the 
corner of Las Vegas Boulevard and Clark Avenue in Las Vegas, Nevada, as 
           the ``Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LLOYD D. GEORGE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse under construction at the corner of 
Las Vegas Boulevard and Clark Avenue in Las Vegas, Nevada, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lloyd D. George United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lloyd D. George 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate July 25, 1997.

            Attest: GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Middlebrooks *et al. v.*Middlebrooks *et al.*

February 25, 1915.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Daniel. Eaj'-ette superior court. September 24, 1913.

*J. F. Golightly*and *Lester C.*Dickson, for plaintiffs.

Per Curiam.

There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the peti tion in this ease.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices*concur, *except Fish, O. J., absent.*
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

GEORGE A. BENAVIDES, 

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

__________________________ 

2013-7066

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 11-2275, Judge William A. Moorman. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, moves 

for a 15-day extension of time, until May 28, 2013, to file 

its response brief. George A. Benavides opposes.

Upon consideration thereof, 

Case: 13-7066 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 05/22/2013
GEORGE BENAVIDES V. SHINSEKI 2

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

 Clerk

s21

Case: 13-7066 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 05/22/2013