alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Roman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD A.
ROMAN              
|Richard A. Roman                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer

November 4, 2010
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration Between City of Buffalo, Appellant, and Buffalo Professional Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 282, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 367]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J), entered June 16, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. The order denied the petition to modify an arbitration award.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner (hereafter, City) appeals from an order denying its petition to modify an arbitration award in favor of respondent. On July 1, 2004, the City modified the health insurance plan provided to members of unions such as respondent that represent City employees. The unions, including respondent, filed a grievance with respect to the modified plan, alleging that the modified plan violated the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (CBA). In 2008, an arbitrator issued an award finding that the City’s actions violated the CBA and awarded relief to both active members and retired former members of respondent. The City filed the instant petition seeking to vacate the award to the extent that it granted relief to the retirees.

Contrary to the City’s contention, the arbitrator did not exceed his authority in fashioning an award that granted relief to the retirees. The issue whether respondent had standing to represent retired employees was for the arbitrator to determine *(see generally Matter of City of Ithaca [Ithaca Paid Fire Fighters*
      *1437
      *Assn., IAFF, Local 737],*29 AD3d 1129, 1130-1131 [2006]; *City of Buffalo v A.F.S.C.M.E. Council 35, Local 264,*107 AD2d 1049, 1049-1050 [1985]), and the record is devoid of any evidence that the elimination of health insurance options did not affect the retirees such that respondent would lack standing to represent them. Thus, the City failed to demonstrate that the arbitrator exceeded his authority *(see Matter of City of Elmira [Elmira Professional Firefighters’ Assn., AFL-CIO, I.A.F.F.-Local 709],*34 AD3d 1075, 1077 [2006]; *see also Baker v Board of Educ., Hoosick Falls Cent. School Dist.,*3 AD3d 678, 680-681 [2004]).

The City further contends that the arbitration award was “indefinite” because the arbitrator granted its request to delay implementation of the award until a related police union case completed the appeal process and thus was finalized. We reject that contention. “An award is subject to vacatur as indefinite or nonfinal ‘only if it leaves the parties unable to determine their rights or obligations, if it does not resolve the controversy submitted, or if it creates a new controversy’ ” *(Matter of Board of Educ. of Amityville Union Free School Dist. v Amityville Teacher’s Assn.,*62 AD3d 992, 993 [2009]), and that is not the case here. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Written StatementPursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

** **

The undersigned, Steven G. Murdock, the ChiefExecutive Officer of Meade Instruments Corp. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, hereby certifies that:

 

(i)   theForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 of theCompany, as amended by Amendment No. 1, (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(ii)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 27, 2009

 
| By:      | /s/  STEVEN G. MURDOCK     |     |
|----------|----------------------------|----------|
| * * | *Chief  Executive Officer* | * * |

 

----
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered by and between 
John Copeland ("Employee") and Netter Digital Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware 
corporation ("Employer"), as of the 11th day of September, 1998, with 
reference to the following facts:

A. Employee is employed by Employer as its Executive Vice President and
Secretary pursuant to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of 
September 15, 1995 as amended to date (the "Employment Agreement").

B. Employer and Employee mutually desire to modify the terms of the 
Employment Agreement as further set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual promises of the 
parties and the mutual benefits they will gain by their performances therof, all
in accordance with the provisions hereinafter set forth, it is agreed:

1. Amendment to Employment Agreement.  The last sentence of Paragraph 
3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in full as 
follows:

"However, the total amount of base salary and Executive Producer fees 
paid to Employee shall be subject to an annual cap of Two Hundred Ten
Thousand Dollars ($210,000) ("Annual Cap")."

1. Effect of Amendment.  Except as set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof, the 
Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, in 
accordance with its terms in effect immediately prior to the effective date 
of this Amendment.

The parties have duly executed this Agreement effective as of the day and year 
set forth above.

                           					EMPLOYER:

                           					NETTER DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

                           					By:/s/Thomas Jorgenson
                     					      An Authorized Representative

                           					EMPLOYEE:

                                J0HN COPELAND

                           					By:/s/John Copeland
                     					      John Copeland
# Official Journal L 159/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 159 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6217 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 159

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6217 June 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/977 of 13 June 2019 amending Annexes II and IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for aclonifen, Beauveria bassiana strain PPRI 5339, Clonostachys rosea strain J1446, fenpyrazamine, mefentrifluconazole and penconazole in or on certain products (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/978 of 14 June 2019 amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 579/2014 granting derogation from certain provisions of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the transport of liquid oils and fats by sea (
  1
  ) | 26 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/977 of 13 June 2019 amending Annexes II and IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for aclonifen, Beauveria bassiana strain PPRI 5339, Clonostachys rosea strain J1446, fenpyrazamine, mefentrifluconazole and penconazole in or on certain products (
  1
  )

Beauveria bassiana

Clonostachys rosea

1

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/978 of 14 June 2019 amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 579/2014 granting derogation from certain provisions of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the transport of liquid oils and fats by sea (
  1
  )

1

26

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Order entered August 5 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 22
- 00615
- CR
EX PARTE JAMES MICHAEL DRAUCKER On Appeal from the County Cour t at Law No. 1 Rockwall Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. WR
- 1
- 22
- 0006
O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s August 2 , 2022 pro se motion for a personal

reco gnizance bond . Appellant is represented by counsel, and he is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Ex parte Bohannan , 350 S.W.3d 1 16, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 201 1). Accordingly, ap pellant’s pro se motion is DENIED without prejudice. /s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
gogo-ex108_214.htm



Exhibit 10.8

 

June 1,2021

 

To Non-Employee Members of the Board of Directors of Gogo Inc. (the “Board”):

 

Amendment to Non-Employee Director Options and Deferred Stock Units

 

On March 30, 2021, the Board resolved that upon a director’s Retirement from the Board, the vesting of such director’s equity grants will accelerate to the Retirement date. Grants made on and after June 30, 2021 will include this provision.

This letter will serve as an amendment to the terms of the currently outstanding and unvested stock options and deferred stock units issued by Gogo Inc. to you on June 30, 2020, September 30,2020, December 31, 2020, and March 31, 2021 (the “Awards”), as set forth in the Notices of Grant, Stock Option Agreements and Deferred Stock Unit Agreements (the “Award Agreements”) under the Amended and Restated Gogo Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Award Agreements,


	
 
	
•
	
Acceleration of Vesting. Upon a director’s Retirement, all theretofore unvested Awards will immediately become fully vested.





	
 
	
•
	
Definition of Retirement. For purposes of the foregoing, the term “Retirement” shall mean your voluntary or involuntary termination of service on the Board, other than by reason of death, Disability, or removal for Cause (as defined in the applicable Award Agreement), occurring on or after the date on which either (x)you reach the age of 65 or (y) your age plus years of service on the Board equal seventy-five (75).





	
 
	
•
	
Effective Date. This amendment is effective as of June 1, 2021.




 


	
 
	
 
	
/s/ Marguerite M. Elias

	
 
	
 
	
Marguerite M. Elias

	
 
	
 
	
Executive Vice President

	
 
	
 
	
General Counsel and Secretary




 

 


			
	
NYOOCS01/1787484.2
	
1
**Exhibit 15.1**

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-46155) pertaining to the Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-88466)pertaining to the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, of our report dated April 27, 2006, relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

New Orleans, Louisiana 

April 27, 2006
Document

Exhibit 10.2





AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR
TO THE
L3HARRIS RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN


WHEREAS, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“L3Harris”), heretofore has adopted and maintains the L3Harris Retirement Savings Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2021 (the "Plan");


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.1 of the Plan, the Employee Benefits Committee of L3Harris (the “Committee”) has the authority to amend the Plan;


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.3 of the Plan, the Committee has delegated certain of such amendment authority to the head of global benefits of L3Harris (currently, the Senior Director, Global Benefits) (the “Head of Global Benefits”); and


WHEREAS, the Head of Global Benefits desires to expand the types of catch-up contributions eligible for match under the Plan in the case of catch-up contributions made by members of either of the Combat Propulsion Systems & International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) and its Local 113 (232) or the Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) and its Local 1279 (CBU) and (TBU) (233).


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Appendix 8, Other Specified Groups, of the Plan hereby is amended, effective for plan years commencing on and after January 1, 2021, to cause the “Match on Catch-Up” provisions therein applicable to the Combat Propulsion Systems Business Unit (2084) to read as follows:


Yes, to be made on a Plan Year basis, provided that during the Plan Year the Participant defers under the Plan, on a pre-tax and/or designated Roth basis, an amount (i) equal to the Code section 402(g) limit or (ii) equal, in the aggregate, to at least 25% of the Participant’s Compensation during the Plan Year (in each case, determined without regard to contributions under any other 401(k) plan)


APPROVED by the HEAD OF GLOBAL BENEFITS on this 12th day of May, 2021.


                            /s/ Allison Oncel        
Allison Oncel
Senior Director, Global Benefits
Exhibit 32.1

Informational Addendum to Annual Report on Form 10-K

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as
follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely
to the extent this certification may be applicable to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the undersigned hereby certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:

Gary D. OwensTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 10, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999             FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998             NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,835                   1,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,624                   6,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,243                     485
<INVENTORY>                                     15,445                  11,910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,178                  21,246
<PP&E>                                           5,565                   4,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,814                   1,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,244                  24,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,549                   5,829
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            79                      79
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,279                  18,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,244                  24,592
<SALES>                                         61,480                  49,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,480                  49,129
<CGS>                                           35,598                  31,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,598                  31,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,450                  10,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 414                     952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,018                   6,098
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,878                   2,555
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,140                   3,543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                   (374)
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,140                   3,169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75                     .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74                     .50
        

</TABLE>
#### Latoyin DAVIS, Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; Selvey, Nurse, North Central Unit, ADC; Holloway, Director, CMS, North Central Unit, ADC; Curtis Meinzer, Warden, North Central Unit, ADC; Arkansas Department of Correction; Hunt, Nurse, North Central Unit, ADC; Lafevers, Nurse, North Central Unit, ADC, Appellees.

No. 11-2046.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 22, 2011.

Filed: Dec. 1, 2011.

Mark H. Allison, Dover & Dixon, Little Rock, AR, for Appellant.

Latoyin Davis, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Brent J. Eubanks, Humphries & Lewis, White Hall, AR, Hester Irene Criswell, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.

Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Inmate Latoyin Davis appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. To the extent Davis challenges the earlier dismissal of Correctional Medical Services (CMS), we conclude that CMS was properly dismissed as Davis was proceeding against it based solely on the conduct of its employees. *See McAdams v. McCord,*584 F.3d 1111, 1113 (8th Cir.2009) (de novo review of dismissal for failure to state claim); *Sanders v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.,*984 F.2d 972, 975-76 (8th Cir.1993) (corporate liability under § 1983). It was also proper to grant summary judgment on the claims against the CMS employees. *See Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc.,*559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir.2009) (de novo review). Under the circumstances established by the record, the nurse defendants were at most negligent, *see Langford v. Norris,*614 F.3d 445, 460 (8th Cir.2010) (plaintiff must show more than even gross negligence, and mere disagreement with treatment decisions does not rise to level of constitutional violation); Davis did not counter the evidence that the CMS administrator merely arranged for transportation once the orthopedic consultation for Davis was scheduled, *see Bloom v. Metro Heart Group of St. Louis, Inc.,*440 F.3d 1025, 1028-29 (8th Cir.2006) (nonmoving party must demonstrate dispute on material issue of fact that might affect outcome of suit under governing law so that reasonable jury could return verdict in his favor); and we agree with the district court that the administrator’s alleged amusement about the situation was not a basis for a constitutional claim under section 1983. Finally, we find no merit to Davis’s assertion of judicial bias. The district court is affirmed.2

2

. We decline to address the claims Davis has abandoned on appeal. *See Griffith v. City of Des Moines,*387 F.3d 733, 739 (8th Cir.2004).

1

. The Honorable Jerome Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1242 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1242

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the nonrefundable 
    personal credits, the standard deduction, and the deduction for 
 personal exemptions in determining alternative minimum tax liability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 1997

  Mr. Kerrey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the nonrefundable 
    personal credits, the standard deduction, and the deduction for 
 personal exemptions in determining alternative minimum tax liability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NONREFUNDABLE PERSONAL CREDITS, THE STANDARD DEDUCTION, AND 
              THE DEDUCTION FOR PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS ALLOWED IN 
              DETERMINING ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX LIABILITY.

    (a) Allowance of Nonrefundable Personal Credits.--Subsection (a) of 
section 26 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation 
based on tax liability; definition of tax liability) is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(a) Limitation Based on Amount of Tax.--The aggregate amount of 
credits allowed by this subpart for the taxable year shall not exceed 
the sum of--
            ``(1) the taxpayer's regular tax liability for the taxable 
        year, plus
            ``(2) the tax imposed by section 55 for such taxable 
        year.''
    (b) Allowance of Standard Deduction and Deduction for Personal 
Exemptions.--Paragraph (1) of section 56(b) of such Code is amended by 
striking subparagraph (E) and by redesignating subparagraph (F) as 
subparagraph (E).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
No. 76-5782.

#### Sims et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.