alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1

                         HYPERION SOLUTIONS CORPORATION

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              JURISDICTION OF
NAME                                                           INCORPORATION
----                                                          ---------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Hyperion Solutions Corporation..............................  Delaware
Hyperion International Corporation..........................  Delaware
AppSource Corporation.......................................  Delaware
Little Tree Acquisition Corporation.........................  Delaware
Hyperion Solutions Austria MbH..............................  Austria
Hyperion Foreign Sales Corp. ...............................  Barbados
Hyperion Solutions BeLux N.V. ..............................  Belgium
Hyperion Solutions Nordic Oy................................  Finland
Hyperion Solutions France SAS...............................  France
Hyperion Solutions Deutschland GmbH.........................  Germany
Hyperion Solutions Italia S.r.l. ...........................  Italy
Hyperion KK.................................................  Japan
HSC Acquisition Co..........................................  Nova Scotia
Sapling Corporation.........................................  Ontario
Hyperion Solutions Corporation of Canada, Ltd. .............  Ontario
Hyperion Solutions Asia Pte. Ltd. ..........................  Singapore
Hyperion Solutions Iberica, S.A. ...........................  Spain
Hyperion Solutions Nordic AB................................  Sweden
Hyperion Solutions Schweiz AG...............................  Switzerland
Hyperion Solutions Nederland, B.V. .........................  The Netherlands
Hyperion Solutions plc......................................  United Kingdom
</TABLE>
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS








As independent oil and gas consultants,
LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. hereby consents to (a) the use of our report
setting forth our estimates of proved reserves and future revenue, as of
December 31, 2009, to the interest of Tengasco, Inc. (“Tengasco”) in certain oil
and gas properties; and (b) all references to our firm included in or made a
part of Tengasco’s Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.








S/Stephen W.
Daniel


LaRoche Petroleum Consultants,
Ltd.


Stephen W. Daniel





Dallas,
Texas


March 18,
2010
Order entered November 2 6 , 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00588

- CR

JAYONA E. JONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd J udicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16

- 75712

- S



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 20, 2018 motion to extend the time to file

appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before

THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I hereby certify that:

I
have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K;

to
the best of my knowledge, this Annual Report on Form 10-K (i) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d); and (ii) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Tengasco, Inc.
and its subsidiaries during the period covered by this Report.

Dated: March 20, 2006

|                                                              | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|s/Jeffrey R. Bailey Jeffrey R. Bailey,Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                                              |
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pullman, Washington Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research Docs





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Staff Organizational Chart
- Pullman Facilities
- Central Ferry Farm
- Prosser Facilities
- Frank Dugan

Facilities - Pullman - Central Ferry Farmheadline bar   The Palouse   Washington State University   Pullman Farm   Seed Storage   *Central Ferry Farm*  Central Ferry Research FarmThe Central Ferry facility is a 24 hectare (100 acre) irrigated farm, shop, greenhouse, and other buildings located on the Snake River about 96 kilometers (60 miles) southwest of Pullman.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>

                           COMMEMORATIVE BRANDS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE

                                      OF

                            SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK

                  The undersigned, being the duly elected and acting
vice-president, secretary and treasurer of COMMEMORATIVE BRANDS, INC., a
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT:

                  1.   A Certificate of Designations of Series B Preferred
Stock setting forth the Powers, Preferences, Rights, Qualifications,
Limitations and Restrictions of Such Preferred Stock was filed by the
Corporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware on December 13, 1996; and

                  2.   A Certificate of Increase of Series B Preferred Stock
increasing by 50,000 the number of shares of the Corporation designated as
Series B Preferred Stock was filed by the Corporation with the Secretary of
State of Delaware on June 10, 1998; and

                  3.   Pursuant to Section 151 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted the
following resolution by unanimous written consent dated June 2, 1998:

                       RESOLVED that, pursuant to the authority vested in
                  the Board of Directors of the Corporation by the provisions
                  of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as
                  amended, the number of shares of the Corporation to be
                  designated as Series B Preferred Stock is hereby increased
                  by 75,000 shares (the "Additional Series B Shares"); and
                  such Additional Series B Shares shall have the same Powers,
                  Preferences, Rights, Qualifications, Limitations and
                  Restrictions as the Series B Preferred Stock so designated
                  prior to the date hereof as set forth in that certain
                  Certificate of Designations of Series B Preferred Stock filed
                  by the Corporation with the Secretary of State of the State of
                  Delaware on December 13, 1996.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate of Increase on behalf of the Corporation this 25th day of June,
1999.

                                 COMMEMORATIVE BRANDS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ Clyde W. Walls
                                 Name:   Clyde W. Walls
                                 Title:  Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
#### IRISH INDUSTRIAL EXPOSITION & AMUSEMENT CO., Limited, v. SHERIDAN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 25, 1907.)

Continuance—Sickness or Party.

Where, upon the application for an adjournment, it appeared from the affidavit of a reputable physician that defendant was so ill that to go to court would be at the risk of his life, an adjournment should be granted, although there had been previous adjournments for the same reason.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent Dig. vol. 10, Continuance, §§ 40-57.]

Appeal from Special Term.

Action by the Irish Industrial Exposition & Amusement Company, Limited, against Andrew Sheridan. From an order denying a motion by defendant to open his default and vacate an inquest taken against him, he appeals. Reversed.

*393Argued before PATTERSON, P. J., and INGRAHAM, LAUGH-LIN, CLARKE, and HOUGHTON, JJ.

Edward W. S. Johnston, for appellant.

T. ,W. Tyng, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

It satisfactorily appears that at the time this inquest was taken the defendant was a sick man, and there was presented to the court upon the application for an adjournment the affidavit of a reputable physician, in which it was stated:

> “That the defendant has been confined to his bed since December 14th, 1906. * * * Although Mr. Sheridan is improving in health, he still has a daily rise of temperature to 102° and is at times very weak. Until these conditions are better, I must forbid him from going to court, as such duty would be at the risk of his life.”

It seems to us that, while there had been some previous adjournments, they had all been caused by the defendant’s serious illness, and that, under the circumstances presented, the. further adjournment asked for ought to have been granted.

The order appealed from therefore should be reversed, without costs in this court to either party, and the motion to open the inquest and let the defendant in to defend granted upon the payment of costs as taxed, and $10 motion costs; the judgment to stand as security.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 89 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 89

 Requesting the President to submit a budget for fiscal year 1998 that 
would balance the Federal budget by fiscal year 2002 without relying on 
                        budgetary contingencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1997

  Mr. Sununu (for himself, Ms. Granger, and Mr. Pitts) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Requesting the President to submit a budget for fiscal year 1998 that 
would balance the Federal budget by fiscal year 2002 without relying on 
                        budgetary contingencies.

Whereas the President has observed on numerous occasions that a constitutional 
        amendment is not necessary to balance the budget, observing in his State 
        of the Union address that ``* * * we don't need a constitutional 
        amendment, we need action.'';
Whereas the President has also repeatedly agreed, most recently on January 28, 
        1997, to balance the budget by fiscal year 2002 based on the estimates 
        of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office; and
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office has officially estimated that the 
        President's budget would increase the deficit by $24 billion in fiscal 
        year 1998 and result in a deficit of at least $69 billion in fiscal year 
        2002: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That (a) the House of Representatives requests the 
President to submit to the House, not later than April 7, 1997, a 
detailed plan to achieve a balanced budget by fiscal year 2002 for the 
United States, as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office, that--
            (1) uses the most recent economic and technical assumptions 
        of the Congressional Budget Office;
            (2) reduces the deficit through programmatic reforms rather 
        than alternative budgetary procedures such as automatic 
        spending cuts and the sunsetting of tax cuts;
            (3) realizes a significant proportion of its total savings 
        in the first three years; and
            (4) offers sufficient Medicare reforms to forestall the 
        imminent bankruptcy of the Medicare trust funds for a 
        substantial period.
    (b) The House of Representatives shall consider a budget plan to 
achieve a balanced budget by fiscal year 2002 for the United States 
that is in compliance with paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection 
(a).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written StatementPursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

The undersigned,Steven L. Muellner, the Chief Executive Officer of Meade Instruments Corp. (the“Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. *§*1350, herebycertifies that:

(i)    the Form 10Qfor the quarterly period ended May 31, 2007 of the Company (the “Report)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: July 16, 2007 |
|--------------------------|
| By:                      | /s/ STEVEN L. MUELLNER |   |
|                     | Steven L. Muellner |
| * *                 | *President and CEO* |

 

----
Exhibit 21.1  Subsidiary
    Companies
  Jurisdiction Under

PercentageName

Which Organized

OwnedAsta Funding, Inc.

DelawareAsta Funding Acquisition I, LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta Funding Acquisition II, LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta Funding Acquisition IV, LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta Commercial, LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta Funding.com, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition I, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition II, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition IV, LLC

Delaware


100
%Computer Finance, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Collection, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition V, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition VI, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition VII, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition VIII, LLC

Delaware


100
%Option Card, LLC

Colorado


100
%Palisades Acquisition IX, LLC

Delaware


100
%VATIV Recovery Solutions LLC

Texas


100
%Palisades Acquisition X, LLC

Delaware


100
%Cliffs Portfolio Acquisition I, LLC

Delaware


100
%Sylvan Acquisition I. LLC

Delaware


100
%Citizens Lending Group LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XI LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XII LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XIII LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XIV LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XV LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XVI LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XVII LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XVIII LLC

Delaware


100
%Brook Mays Joint Venture

Massachusetts


25
%Ventura Services LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades XII Do Brasil Gesto Financeira Ltda

Brazil


99.9
%  52
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Soil Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Carl P. Ranno, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno
------------------------------------
Carl P. Ranno,
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

Informational Addendum to Annual Report on Form 10-K

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation
does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may be applicable to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the undersigned hereby certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Gary D. OwensName:

Gary D. OwensTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 11, 2009
#### Nikki POOSHS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHILLIP MORRIS USA, INC.; Philip Morris Companies, Inc.; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company; Nabisco Group Holdings Corp.; Nabisco Inc.; Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to the American Tobacco Company and its predecessors in interest; British American Tobacco Company PLC; Lorillard Tobacco Company; Lorillard Inc.; Liggett Group Incorporated; Liggett & Myers Inc.; Liggett and Myers Tobacco Company; Vector Group Ltd.; Hill & Knowlton Inc.; Tobacco Institute, Inc.; Council For Tobacco Research USA Incorporated; DNA Plant Technology, Corporation; Safeway Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-16338.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 2008.

Filed July 14, 2011.

Lloyd F. Leroy, James P. Nevin, Esquire, Gilbert L. Purcell, Esquire, Brayton Purcell, LLP, Novato, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Daniel Paul Collins, Munger, Tolies & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, James Lee Dumas, Esquire, Jenny Bown, Esquire, Alicia J. Donahue, Esquire, Chris Johnson, Esquire, Kevin Underhill, Esquire, Shook Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Peter N. Larson, Jones Day, Stanley G. Roman, Esquire, Tracy M. Clements, Esquire, Krieg, Keller, Sloan, Reilley & Roman, LLP, Raymond Charles Marshall, Esquire, Bingham McCutchen, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Paul Crist, Esquire, Ashlie E. Case, Esquire, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, J. Leah Castel-la, Esquire, McDonough Holland & Allen PC, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees.

Before: B. FLETCHER and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and HART, *362District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable William T. Hart, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Following certification of certain questions by this court, the California Supreme Court clarified the state law limitations period applicable to plaintiffs claims. Based on that decision, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the decision. *See Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.,*51 Cal.4th 788, 123 Cal.Rptr.3d 578, 250 P.3d 181 (2011).

Also, the pending related mandamus petition is moot and will be dismissed.

Because of plaintiffs illness, the district court is urged to resolve the remaining issues in this case as soon as possible.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-56765 and 333-61727) and in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-84846, 333-10697, 333-38871, 333-62275,
333-50942 and 333-49182) of Hyperion Solutions Corporation of our report dated
July 25, 2002, except Note 10, which is as of August 29, 2002, relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, CA
September 24, 2002
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Peregrine Oil & Gas, LP v. HRB Oil & Gas, Ltd. and VHPM, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 1 80

- C V

Trial court case number: 2016

- 45652

Trial court: 190th District Court, Harris County, Texas

Date motion filed: September 12 , 201 8

Party filing motion: Appell ee

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Terry Jennings

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack, Justice Jennings

, and Justice Lloyd

.

Date:

_ 10 / 23 /2018

___