alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-10,271-20

EX PARTE ROBERT GORDON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NUMBER 13,472

IN THE 12 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT WALKER COUNTY

TH

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,

the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus.

Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of

aggravated assault and sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court

of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Gorgon v. State, No. 14-86-00460-CR (Tex.

App.–Houston[14th], June 4, 1987).
After a review of the record, we find that Applicant’s claim regarding his parole

review is without merit. Therefore, we deny relief.

All of Applicant’s other claims are dismissed as subsequent. TEX. CODE CRIM. PRO.

Art. 11.07 §4.

Filed: November 26, 2014

Do not publish
**Exhibit 31.****1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,   Gary Stern, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Asta Funding, Inc.; and

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

| /s/  Gary Stern                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Gary Stern                                                                                                                |   |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer         |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                             |   |

 

Date: January 27, 2020

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff per request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael N. Murdock, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL N. MURDOCK                                              
|Michael N. Murdock Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

Dated: September 26, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

** **

In connection with theAnnual Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Calvin E. Jenness,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the report.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 
| Date: March 13,  2008 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
|                       |
| /s/ Calvin E. Jenness      |   |
| Calvin E. Jenness          |
| Senior Vice President  and |
| Chief Financial Officer    |

 

----
#### WEIDENMANN, Respondent, v. BISSELL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by Adolph Weidenmann against Chas. H,. Bissell.

No opinion. Judgment- and order affirmed, with costs.
#### Lina Rivera, Appellant, v New York Presbyterian Hospital et al., Defendants, and Andrew J. Szabo, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 181]—

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), entered September 3, 2010, which, upon the granting of the motion of the defendant Andrew J. Szabo pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law, made at the close of the plaintiff’s case, is in favor of that defendant and against her, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

*862Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“A party’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law should be granted only when, accepting the opposing party’s evidence as true, and according that evidence the benefit of every favorable inference that can reasonably be drawn therefrom, there is no rational process by which the fact finder could base a finding in favor of the nonmoving party” *(Germain v Irizarry,*82 AD3d 833, 835 [2011]; *see Szczerbiak v Pilat,*90 NY2d 553, 556 [1997]; *Dockery v Sprecher,*68 AD3d 1043, 1045 [2009]). “Although physicians owe a general duty of care to their patients, that duty may be limited to those medical functions undertaken by the physician and relied on by the patient” *(Covert v Walker, 82*AD3d 825, 826 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Ellis v Eng,*70 AD3d 887, 892 [2010]; *Dockery v Sprecher,*68 AD3d at 1046).

Here, viewing the plaintiffs evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, there was no evidence that the defendant Andrew J. Szabo, who was treating the decedent’s thyroid cancer, undertook to diagnose or treat the decedent’s liver disease, which he knew was being treated by the decedent’s gastroenterologist. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted Szabo’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401, made at the close of the plaintiffs case, for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him *(see Ellis v Eng,*70 AD3d at 892; *Dockery v Sprecher,*68 AD3d at 1045-1046; *Wasserman v Staten Is. Radiological Assoc., 2*AD3d 713, 714 [2003]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs remaining contentions. Angiolillo, J.P, Belen, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:03-cr-00978 Document #: 96-2 Filed: 10/15/04 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:246
Case: 1:03-cr-00978 Document #: 96-2 Filed: 10/15/04 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:247
Case: 1:03-cr-00978 Document #: 96-2 Filed: 10/15/04 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:248
Case: 1:03-cr-00978 Document #: 96-2 Filed: 10/15/04 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:249
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Water Management Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Commodity Protection and Quality Research
                                    Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Water Management Research People & Locations





- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- Dong Wang - Research Leader
- James Ayars
- Gary Banuelos
- Suduan Gao
- James Gerik
- Ruijun Qin

Gary S Banuelos
                     

                     RES SOIL SCNTST


                     Phone: (559) 596-2880
                     
                     

                     Fax: (559) 596-2851
                     

                     9611 S. RIVERBEND AVE.                            
                     
                     

                     PARLIER                       , CA 93648


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6708

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GREGORY TODD HARRELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-94-37, CA-97-183-R)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Todd Harrell, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Breeding Peters,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998),

and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Harrell, Nos. CR-94-37; CA-97-183-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 21,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O

. P D

- 1 4 7 2

- 1 2

T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S

v .

B R A N D O N C O R N E L I U S H A R R I S , A p p e l l a n t

O N A P P E L L A N T ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W

F R O M T H E T E N T H C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

B R A Z O S C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m .

O P I N I O N

A p p e l l a n t w a s c h a r g e d w i t h m u r d e r u n d e r T e x a s P e n a l C o d e § 1 9

. 0 2 ( b ) ( 2 )

. H e w a s

f o u n d g u i l t y a n d s e n t e n c e d t o t h i r t y y e a r s i n p r i s o n

. O n a p p e a l , h e a r g u e d t h a t t h e t r i a l c o u r t

e r r e d i n f a i l i n g t o c h a r g e t h e j u r y o n t h e l e s s e r
- i n c l u d e d o f f e n s e o f m a n s l a u g h t e r

. T h e C o u r t

o f A p p e a l s d i s a g r e e d , h o l d i n g t h a t m a n s l a u g h t e r c a n n e v e r b e a l e s s e r
- i n c l u d e d o f f e n s e o fH A R R I S

- 2

m u r d e r u n d e r § 1 9

. 0 2 ( b ) ( 2 )

. H a r r i s v

. S t a t e , N o

. 1 0

- 1 1

- 0 0 0 3 5

- C R , 2 0 1 2 T e x

. A p p

. L E X I S

5 2 0 1 , a t * 8 ( T e x

. A p p

. — W a c o J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 ) ( n o t d e s i g n a t e d f o r p u b l i c a t i o n ) ( c i t i n g

C a v a z o s v

. S t a t e , 3 2 9 S

. W

. 3 d 8 3 8 ( T e x

. A p p

. — E l P a s o 2 0 1 0 , p e t

. g r a n t e d ) )

.

A p p e l l a n t h a s f

i l e d a p e t i t i o n f

o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w o f t h i s d e c i s i o n , n o t i n g t h a t t h i s

C o u r t g r a n t e d r e v i e w i n C a v a z o s

. W e r e c e n t l y h a n d e d d o w n o u r o p i n i o n i n C a v a z o s v

. S t a t e ,

N o

. P D

- 1 6 7 5

- 1 0 , 2 0 1 2 T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. L E X I S 1 3 8 7 ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. O c t o b e r 3 1 , 2 0 1 2 )

.

I n C a v a z o s , w e h e l d t h a t m a n s l a u g h t e r c a n b e a l e s s e r
- i n c l u d e d o f f e n s e o f m u r d e r u n d e r §

1 9

. 0 2 ( b ) ( 2 )

. I

d

. a t * 1 9

.

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s i n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e d i d n o t h a v e t h e b e n e f i t o f o u r o p i n i o n i n

C a v a z o s

. A c c o r d i n g l y , w e g r a n t A p p e l l a n t ’ s p e t i t i o n f o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w o n g r o u n d s

o n e a n d t w o , v a c a t e t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s , a n d r e m a n d t h i s c a s e t o t h e C o u r t

o f A p p e a l s i n l i g h t o f o u r o p i n i o n i n C a v a z o s

. G r o u n d t h r e e o f A p p e l l a n t ’ s p e t i t i o n i s

r e f u s e d

.

D A T E D E L I V E R E D : D e c e m b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 2 D O N O T P U B L I S H
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Science Research: Raleigh, NC
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Raleigh, North Carolina Plant Science Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

People and Locations at Raleigh, North Carolina   [Expand All] [Collapse All]
  (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1202

Providing relief for Sergio Lozano, Fauricio Lozano, and Ana Lozano.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1997

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

Providing relief for Sergio Lozano, Fauricio Lozano, and

Ana Lozano.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Sergio Lozano, Fauricio Lozano, and Ana

7 Lozano, shall be held and considered to have been lawfully

8 admitted to the United States for permanent residence as

9 of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment

10 of the required visa fees.

Æ
#### FRISBEE, Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF PORT BYRON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 19, 1907.)

Action by Elizabeth Frisbee against the village of Port Byron.

PER CURIAM.

Order of affirmance previously entered herein amended by adding thereto, “with leave to plaintiff to elect to accept the amount of the verdict as reduced and as provided in the order appealed from,” said election to be made within 10 days, but upon condition that the plaintiff within 10 days after the entry of this order shall deliver to the defendant a stipulation permitting the defendant to appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment entered herein, if any, and shall pay to the defendant $10 costs of this motion.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20246 Summary Calendar
MR. J. JESUS GALVAN SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant

v. ERIC H HOLDER, JR., Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CV-1038
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * J. Jesus Galvan Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico in the midst of removal proceedings, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 peti t i o n i n the district court, arguing that he could not be removed from the United States because he was not
an aggravated felon under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). He sought termination of the removal proce e di n g s a nd release from custody. The district court concluded that pursuant to the REAL ID Act, it was without subj ect matter jurisdiction to consider Sanchez’s petition. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Janu ary4, 201 2 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-20246 Document: 00511712911 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2012No. 11-20246

Sanchez argues here that the REAL ID Act is unconstitutional. Sanchez did not present this argument in the district court. Because Sanchez’s argument regarding the constitutionality of the REAL ID Act is raised for the first time on appeal, this court need not consider it. Se e L e v e re tte v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-20246 Document: 00511712911 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/04/2012
#### WILSON, Respondent, v. ELECTRO DYNAMIC CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department;

October 4, 1907.)

Action by E'remont Wilson against the Electro Dynamic Company.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 1997
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,647,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,171,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                    31,500
<INVENTORY>                                  1,615,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,454,068
<PP&E>                                       1,561,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                 382,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,633,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,533,949
<BONDS>                                      1,788,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,560
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,255,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,633,268
<SALES>                                      4,104,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,104,601
<CGS>                                        2,811,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,811,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,019,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,160,638)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,795,615)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (365,023)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,160,638)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)


</TABLE>