alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gary Stanovick et al., Plaintiffs, v Donner-Hanna Coke Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Modern Refractories Service Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Absent a timely motion to strike a note of issue or statement of readiness, a party is foreclosed from further discovery unless there is a demonstration of special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances to justify a departure from the rule foreclosing further discovery after the statement of readiness has been filed *(Gray v Crouse-Irving Mem. Hosp.,*107 AD2d 1038, 1039; *see also, Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v Pomeroy Real Estate Corp.,*74 AD2d 734, *appeal dismissed*50 NY2d 842). This result obtains notwithstanding so-called agreements between parties which would effectively circumvent this department’s calendar rules *(Gray v Crouse-Irving Mem. Hosp., supra,*p 1039; *Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v Pomeroy Real Estate Corp., supra; Burnett Process v Richlar Indus.,*47 AD2d 994).

Special Term’s grant of further discovery after the case had been placed on the Trial Calendar, and on the eve of trial, was an abuse of discretion. No unusual or extraordinary circumstances have been shown and, indeed, no motion to strike the case from the calendar was made.

Third-party defendant’s argument, raised for the first time on this appeal, that since no separate note of issue was filed in the third-party action (22 NYCRR 1024.4 [d]), it is not bound by plaintiff’s filing of the note of issue, has no merit. Third-party defendant was served with the note of issue and statement of readiness which was captioned with both the main action and the third-party action and acknowledged service of same, 22 NYCRR 1024.4 (e) provides that within 20 days of the filing, any party may move to strike the case from the calendar, and specifically provides that "no such motion shall be allowed by *any party*thereafter” (emphasis supplied). Third-party defendant never made a motion required by the rules, which makes its motion for further discovery fatally defective. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, J. — discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Wireless Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ending September 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David D. Singer, the President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, that I believe that:





(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: October 11, 2002





WORLD WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.By:

/s/    DAVID D.
SINGERDavid D. Singer President
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.02

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Svend-Olav Carlsen, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that based
upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transmeta Corporation, for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K"), the Form 10-K fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Transmeta Corporation for the annual period covered by the Form
10-K.

Date: March 5, 2004                     By: /s/ Svend-Olav Carlsen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Chief Financial Officer,
                                        Transmeta Corporation

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Transmeta Corporation and will be retained by Transmeta
Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to                               ( print page 40883)                            the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         July 29, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 12, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 199 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-111, CP2021-113.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-16103 Filed 7-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

 

:

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, :

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 03-C-3904

:

KEVIN TRUDEAU, :

Defendant. :

 

MOTION TO HOLD DEFENDANT TRUDEAU IN CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATING THE

JUNE 2, 2010 ORDER, INCARCERATE HIM, AND ORDER HIM TO PROVIDE AN

ACCOUNTING OF AND TURNOVER ASSETS

On June 2, 2010, the Court ordered Defendant Kevin Trudeau to pay a contempt sanction

of $37,616,161 to the FTC. Trudeau has violated the Court’s Order by failing to pay even one

penny, and his claim of poverty is meritless. He is engaged in multiple lucrative business

ventures that generate millions of dollars in revenues. He has systematically concealed

substantial assets by various means, and dissipated other assets on his lavish lifestyle. Moreover,

Trudeau’s complete failure to pay, his extensive history of failing to obey court orders, and his

total lack of credibility, demonstrate that he will not comply with the Court's Order unless he is

coerced to do so by incarceration. Accordingly, the FTC moves to: (1) hold Trudeau in

contempt for failing to pay the $37,616,161 contempt sanction; (2) immediately incarcerate him

to coerce his compliance; and (3) order that he remain incarcerated until he purges his contempt

by paying the sanction in full, with interest, and failing that, until he fully accounts for and turns

Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 481 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:6768
over all assets directly or indirectly held by him or for his benefit. This Motion is supported by

the FTC’s accompanying Brief and Exhibits in support thereof. 

Dated: July 13, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

David A. O’Toole (dotoole@ftc.gov)

Federal Trade Commission

55 W. Monroe St., Suite 1825

Chicago, IL 60603

phone: 312-960-5601 

fax: 312-960-5600

/s/ Michael P. Mora 

Michael P. Mora (mmora@ftc.gov)

Stephen Dowdell (sdowdell@ftc,gov)

Federal Trade Commission

601 New Jersey Ave., N.W., Suite 2215

Washington, DC 20001

phone: 202-326-3373, - 2814

fax: 202-326-2559

Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 481 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:6769
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1104 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 412
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1104

                          [Report No. 105-214]

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections in maps 
           relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

Mr. Hollings (for himself, Ms. Snowe, and Mr. Thurmond) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

                             June 12, 1998

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections in maps 
           relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make such corrections 
to the set of maps described in subsection (b) as are necessary to 
restore on that map the September 30, 1982, boundary for Unit M09 on 
the portion of Edisto Island located immediately to the south and west 
of the Jeremy Cay Causeway.
    (b) Map Described.--The map described is the map included in a set 
of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources System,'' dated October 
24, 1990, that relates to the Unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Systems entitled ``Edisto Complex M09/M09P''.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 412

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1104

                          [Report No. 105-214]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections in maps 
           relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 12, 1998

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with this annual report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended July 2, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





August 29, 2011




By:
/s/ Alex C. HuiAlex C. HuiChief Executive OfficerPericom Semiconductor Corporation
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2392

ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRAVIS HEDRICK,

Defendant – Appellant,

and

TALLEY RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Inferno,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00621-TDS-JLW)

Submitted: July 31, 2015 Decided: August 18, 2015

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary K. Sue, Stephanie W. Anderson, BURTON, SUE & ANDERSON, 

L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina; Douglas S. Harris, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Steven G. Janik, 

Crystal L. Maluchnik, JANIK L.L.P., Cleveland, Ohio; Lovic A. 

Brooks, III, JANIK L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina; Richard L. 
2

Pinto, PINTO COATES KYRE & BOWERS PLLC, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Travis Hedrick appeals the district court’s order granting 

summary judgment to Arch Specialty Insurance Company in this 

insurance case. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the 

record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Arch 

Specialty Ins. Co. v. Hedrick, No. 1:13-cv-00621-TDS-JLW 

(M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2014); see also Britt v. Hayes, 541 S.E.2d 

761, 762 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001) (holding that claims of battery 

and negligence are compatible). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                        311,803
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      6,599,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   662,991
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      1,686,597
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        1,762,900
<LOANS>                                    13,462,430
<ALLOWANCE>                                    60,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             23,442,711
<DEPOSITS>                                 16,137,521
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           638,293
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        4,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  6,662,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             23,442,711
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               598,500
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              98,226
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              157,789
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              854,515
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            384,812
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            384,812
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         469,703
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               326,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               149,259
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    149,259
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   94,972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.59
<LOANS-NON>                                         0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    0       
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              60,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           60,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as anofficer of Force Protection, Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge,the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m or 78o(d)) and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This writtenstatement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Date: August 10,  2009 | /s/ MICHAEL  MOODY                         |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                        | **Michael  Moody**                         |
|                        | **President  and Chief Executive Officer** |
|                        |                                       |
| Date: August 10,  2009 | /s/ CHARLES  MATHIS                        |
|                        | **Charles  Mathis**                        |
|                        | **Chief  Financial Officer**               |

 

This exhibit shall not bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall itbe deemed incorporated by reference in any filings under the Securities Act of1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after thedate hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in anyfilings.

 

1

----
# Official Journal C 425/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 425 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 658 November 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 425

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 658 November 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 425/01 | Euro exchange rates — 7 November 2022 | 1 |
| | European Data Protection Supervisor |
| 2022/C 425/02 | Summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on asset recovery and confiscation
  (The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS website https://edps.europa.eu) | 2 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 425/01

Euro exchange rates — 7 November 2022

1

European Data Protection Supervisor

2022/C 425/02

Summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on asset recovery and confiscation
  (The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS website https://edps.europa.eu)

(The full text of this Opinion can be found in English, French and German on the EDPS website https://edps.europa.eu)

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 425/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10941 – ENI / SONATRACH / EQUINOR / IN SALAH JV) (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2022/C 425/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10942 - PHO P/STORA ENSO MAXAU) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 425/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10941 – ENI / SONATRACH / EQUINOR / IN SALAH JV) (
  1
  )

1

4

2022/C 425/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10942 - PHO P/STORA ENSO MAXAU) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul E. Ross, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meade Instruments Corp.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
January 14, 2008

|By: |  | /s/PAUL E. ROSSPaul E. Ross Senior Vice PresidentFinance and
CFO |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks