alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 43663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17022]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 25, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Cheryl Allen, Sterling, Illinois; Gregg DeVries, Byron, 
Illinois; and Sandra K. DeVries Trust, Sandra K. Devries, as trustee, 
and Roger P. DeVries Trust, Roger P. DeVries, as trustee, all of 
Milledgeville, Illinois; as the DeVries Family Control Group, a group 
acting in concert; and Edward M. Tyne, Kay F. Tyne, and Margaret A. 
Tyne, all of Polo, Illinois; and Courtney Tyne, Washington, DC; as the 
Tyne Family Control Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire 
additional voting shares of Milledgeville Bancorp, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Milledgeville State Bank, both of 
Milledgeville, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 5, 
2021.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-17022 Filed 8-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DE R R E C K S UN DE R L AN D, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. K A TH Y M EN D O ZA - PO W ERS, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 15400 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 6 -cv -0 0 9 9 9 -L JO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L a w r e nc e J . O ’ N e i l l , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d J une 29, 2010 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , a n dG R A B E R , C ir c u it J u d g e s . C al i forni a s t at e pri soner D erre ck S un derl and app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve 

# FI LED JU L 09 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSW e g r a n t S u n d e r la n d ’s r e q u e s t f o rac e rtif

ic a te o f ap p e a lab ilitya s to 1 w h e th e rth e B o a r d o f

P r is o n T e rm s ’ ( “B o a r d ” ) 2 0 0 3 d e c is io n d e n y in g h im p a r o le v io la te dh is d u e p r o c e s s r ig h ts b e c au s e it b r e a c h e dh is p le aa g r e e m e n t, a n da s to w hether the di stri ctcourtabused i t s di sc re t i on i n fai l i ng t o g rantan evi dent i ary hear i ng re gardi ng thi s i ss ue.

09- 15400 2 j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 1 S u n d e r la n d c o n te n d s th a t h e w a s d e p r iv e do f th e b e n e f

its o f h is p le ab a r g a in a s ar e s ul tof

the B oa r d’ s 2003 de c i s i on f i ndi ng hi m uns ui t abl e f

orpa r ol e . T he s ta te c o u rt’s r e

je c tio n o f

th is c la im w a s n o t c o n tr a ryto o ra n u n r e a s o n ab le appl i ca t i on of Sa n to b el lo v. N ew Y o rk , 4 0 4 U .S . 2 5 7 , 2 6 1 - 6 2 ( 1 9 7 1 ) . T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n fai l i ng t o g rantan e vi de nt i a ryhe a r i ng be c aus e S unde r l a nd di d nots e tf orth ac ol or abl e c l a i m f

or r e lie f . See Sc hr i r o v . L andr i

gan , 5 5 0 U .S . 4 6 5 , 4 7 4 ( 2 0 0 7 ) . W e d ec li n e to g ra n t a ce rtificate o f ap p ea lab il ity a s to w h eth erS u n d er lan d ’s no c ont e s tpl e aw a s notknow i ng a nd vol unt a ry , a nd w he the rthe gove rnm e nt br e a c he d hi s pl e aa gr e e m e ntbyf i l i ng as t a t e m e ntpur s ua ntt o C a l . P e na l C ode § 1 2 0 3 .0 1 , r e f

e r e n c in g ap r io ro f

f e n s e . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 ( c ) ( 2 ) ; Slack v . McD an i el , 5 2 9 U .S . 4 7 3 , 4 8 4 - 8 5 ( 2 0 0 0 ) . W e gr a ntS unde r l a nd’ s r e que s tf orj udi c i a l not i c e , f

i l e d on J une 15, 2009. AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERNET AMERICA, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                       322
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,685
<PP&E>                                           5,864
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,287
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,345
<CGS>                                           17,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,834)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,826)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,826)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.49)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, George J. Carter, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form
            10-Q/A of Franklin Street Properties Corp.;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
            statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this quarterly report; and

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
            information included in this report, fairly present in all material
            respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
            flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
            this report.




Dated:  May 3, 2004                      /s/ George J. Carter
                                         ---------------------------
                                         George J. Carter
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       24
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 OFFICIAL BUS;
PENALTY FOR 

### 2/4/2015 PRIVATE USE 

## HARGROVE, MARCUS WAYnIe The Court has dismissed your application forwritof habeas corpus without written 

### order; the sentence has been discharged: See Exparte Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 

## 452 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). ^ ' ,T?:fcCf 02 1R 00020031S2 FEB09 2015 

### Cfti^DFROMWRW1 ,W5;!02

AbelAcosta, Cle'-1 

# $\ MARCUS WAYNE HARGROVE 1926H"§B 

# I*

H3B \s
#### Elizabeth Pollina, Respondent, v Oakland’s Restaurant, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[945 NYS2d 134]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by a letter dated September 22, 2011, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk *1191County (Pitts, J.), dated February 25, 2011, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“ ‘A defendant who moves for summary judgment in a slip- and-fall case has the initial burden of making a prima facie case showing that it neither created the hazardous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it’ ” *(Bruk v Razag, Inc.,*60 AD3d 715, 715 [2009], quoting *Sloane v Costco Wholesale Corp.,*49 AD3d 522, 523 [2008]; *see Granillo v Toys “R” Us, Inc.,*72 AD3d 1024, 1025 [2010]). Here, the defendants sustained this burden by submitting the transcript of the deposition testimony of the manager of the restaurant where the subject accident occurred, demonstrating that they neither created the allegedly greasy condition that caused the plaintiff’s fall nor had actual or constructive notice thereof, since the manager inspected the landing where the accident allegedly occurred every 5 to 10 minutes during the course of the evening, and did not observe any dark-colored stains or water on the landing prior to the plaintiffs accident *(see Cusack v Peter huger, Inc.,*77 AD3d 785, 786 [2010]; *DeLeon v Westhab, Inc.,*60 AD3d 888 [2009]; *Malenda v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.,*50 AD3d 972, 972-973 [2008]; *Sloane v Costco Wholesale Corp.,*49 AD3d at 523). In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants had actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition by submitting evidence that another restaurant patron had allegedly slipped and fallen on a greasy substance on the landing one to two hours before the plaintiffs accident, and had informed a restaurant employee about his fall *(see Walters v Costco Wholesale Corp.,*51 AD3d 785 [2008]).

We note that the conflict between the plaintiffs original deposition testimony and the correction sheet “raises an issue of credibility which may not be resolved on a motion for summary judgment” *(Williams v O & Y Concord 60 Broad St. Co.,*304 AD2d 570, 571 [2003]; *see Breco Envtl. Contrs., Inc. v Town of Smithtown,*31 AD3d 359, 360 [2006]; *Surdo v Albany Collision Supply, Inc.,*8 AD3d 655 [2004]).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Dillon, J.P, Eng, Belen and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,757,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  320,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (15,495)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,077,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,181,602
<PP&E>                                         166,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,440,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          571,215
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,404
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,989,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,440,731
<SALES>                                        988,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               988,858
<CGS>                                          783,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  783,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,318,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,040,238)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,040,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,040,238)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO DEBENTURE


 


This Amendment No. 6 to Debenture (this “Amendment”) dated
this 2nd day of August, 2021, by and among Bespoke Extracts, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and The Vantage Group
Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the “Holder”).


 


WHEREAS, the Holder is the holder of an outstanding
original issue discount convertible debenture of the Company, in the outstanding principal amount of $100,000, with an original issue
date of December 24, 2019, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated May 28, 2020, Amendment No. 2 thereto, dated August 21, 2020,
Amendment No. 3 thereto, dated December 10, 2020, Amendment No. 4 thereto, dated January 15, 2021, and Amendment No. 5 thereto, dated
April 2, 2021 (as amended, the “Debenture”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to amend
the Debenture as more particularly set forth below;


 


WHEREFORE, the parties do hereby agree as follows:


 


1. The Maturity Date of the
Debenture is hereby amended to be August 31, 2021. For the avoidance of doubt, no default will be deemed to have occurred, and no default
interest will be deemed to have accrued or be owed, since the original issuance of the Debenture to the date of this Amendment.


 


2. Except as modified herein,
the terms of the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3. This Amendment may be executed
in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and shall be binding upon all parties,
their successors and assigns, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. A signature delivered by facsimile
or email shall constitute an original.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	BESPOKE EXTRACTS, INC.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Danil Pollack	 
	Name: 	Danil Pollack	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 


 


	THE VANTAGE GROUP LTD.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Lyle Hauser	 
	Name: 	Lyle Hauser	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000595

18-NOV-2015

08:55 AM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, )

)

Plaintiff, ) No. 03 C 3904

v. )

) Judge Robert W. Gettleman

KEVIN TRUDEAU, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in open court this date and previously, the court finds that

defendant Trudeau is in contempt of this court’s previous orders to pay $37.6 million to the

plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and to fully disclose his assets. The evidence

presented by the Receiver and the FTC has demonstrated that Trudeau has continued to conceal

assets and transfer to third parties funds that should have been paid to the FTC.

In addition, the court finds that’s defendant Kevin Trudeau has lied to the court in

representing that he has disclosed all of his assets and disbursements. The court has previously

incarcerated defendant Trudeau to coerce compliance with its orders, but released him so that he

could defend himself in the criminal case that was pending against him, United States v. Kevin

Trudeau, No. 10 CR 886. The court notes that on November 12, 2013, Trudeau was convicted in

that case and is currently incarcerated pending post-trial motions and sentencing. Nevertheless,

this court retains the power to incarcerate defendant Trudeau as a sanction to coerce compliance

with its orders. Such coercive incarceration is independent of any term of incarceration resulting

from defendant Trudeau’s criminal conviction. See United States v. Quinn, 2013 WL 3811651

(N.D. Ill. July 19, 2013) (Shadur, J.), and cases cited therein. 
For these reasons, the court orders Trudeau to be incarcerated in this action to coerce his

compliance with the court’s orders to pay the $37.6 million to the Federal Trade Commission

and to fully disclose his assets as previous directed. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b), the time

spent in custody from the date this order is entered until defendant Trudeau purges himself of the

contempt is time spent in official detention for the contempt and not for any other charge or

offense. Defendant Trudeau shall not receive credit, in any sentence in any criminal proceeding

for any time served in custody for contempt of this court’s orders. The incarceration for civil

contempt shall begin upon entry of this order, and shall remain in effect until further ordered by

this court.

SO ORDERED 

ENTER: November 21, 2013

__________________________________________

Robert W. Gettleman

United States District Judge

2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 6, 2017

No. 04-16-00782-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.R-A.A.,

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15189A

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s request for supplementation of the record is granted. A transcript of the 

proceedings on August 11, 2016 has been filed, but no exhibits were filed. We order court 

reporter Kelly M. Grossman to file a supplemental record containing the exhibits offered and 

admitted at the August 11, 2016 proceedings in this case. The supplemental record is due 

January 16, 2017.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
03/31/2000 UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          26,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (24,368)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,031
<PP&E>                                         355,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                (82,596)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,090,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          290,944
<BONDS>                                        642,457
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,975
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,090,376
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,225
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                75,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,334
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                  Exhibit 23.2


                       Consent of Independent Accountants



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
GelTex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-60699, 333-60703,
333-00864, 333-06779, 333-08535) of our report, dated February 23, 1999, on our
audit of the financial statements of RenaGel LLC as of December 31, 1998 and for
the year ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boston, Massachusetts 
March 30, 1999
#### GOLDEN, Respondent, v. HERRING-HALLMARVIN SAFE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department,

November 8, 1907.)

Appeal from Trial Term.

Action by Joseph Golden against the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, he appeals. Reversed, and new trial granted. Frank v. Johnson, for appellant. Charles Caldwell, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The facts disclosed by the evidence in the present case do not differ in any material particular from those involved in Dolan v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., 105 App. Div. 366, 94 N. Y. Supp. 241. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.