alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                                          10,336,000     
<SECURITIES>                                    32,128,000     
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,733,000     
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,701,000)    
<INVENTORY>                                      6,501,000  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,115,000  
<PP&E>                                         184,701,000  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (55,845,000) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 410,664,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,447,000 
<BONDS>                                        200,000,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                           136,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,797,000     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   410,664,000   
<SALES>                                          4,954,000   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,413,000   
<CGS>                                            4,575,000   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,690,000   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,629,000   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,365,000   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,538,000   
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (466,000)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,072,000   
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0   
<CHANGES>                                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,072,000   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .08    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .08    
                                           

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 11

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings
per share:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             (Expressed in U.S. Currency)

                                                             Three months ended March 31,
                                                               2003                2002
                                                           -----------         -----------
<S>                                                        <C>                 <C>
Numerator:
Net loss                                                   $  (628,717)        $  (507,934)
Dividends on Series A preferred stock                             (763)               (763)
Dividends on Series B preferred stock                          (83,466)            (50,597)
                                                           -----------         -----------

Numerator for basic and diluted loss per
share loss available to common shareholders                $  (712,946)        $  (559,294)
                                                           -----------         -----------

Denominator:
Denominator for basic loss per share-
weighted average shares outstanding                         10,692,674          10,061,777

                                                           -----------         -----------

Basic and diluted loss per share                           $     (0.07)        $     (0.06)
                                                           -----------         -----------
</TABLE>
Case: 1:03-cv-08590 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:51
Case: 1:03-cv-08590 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:52
Case: 1:03-cv-08590 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:53
Case: 1:03-cv-08590 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:54
#### In the Matter of John Shirvell, Petitioner, v Edward V. Regan, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

—Kane, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

On January 28, 1981, while taking a burglary suspect into custody, petitioner suffered a heart attack. Subsequently, on or about April 14, 1983, petitioner filed an application for accidental disability retirement benefits. This application was disapproved on the ground that the incident in question did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 363. Petitioner appealed this determination and, after a hearing, respondent issued a determination in which he denied the application on the ground that the incident in question was not an accident. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued and was transferred to this court.

We confirm. The record contains substantial evidence to support respondent’s determination that the incident of January 28, 1981 occurred in the ordinary course of petitioner’s normal and expected duties and, as such, did not constitute an accident *(see, Matter of Sheehan v Regan,*84 AD2d 604, 605).

Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, the change by the Legislature in 1974 of the presumption contained in Retirement and Social Security Law § 363-a did not impair any right of petitioner *(cf. Matter of Lippman v Board of Educ.,*66 NY2d 313). The determination must, therefore, be confirmed.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M IG U E L S A L A Z A R , a. k. a. M i gu elA ng el S al azar-F l o res, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74209 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 952- 222 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M i gue lS a l a z ar , nat i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen b as ed o n in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 .



# FI LED MA R 02 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 74209 2 W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) , an dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng S al az ar ’ s m ot i on t o reopen b e c au s e h e p r e s e n te din s u f f ic ie n t e v id e n c e to e s tab lis h p r e ju d ic e . See R o ja s - G a rc ia v . A s h c r o

ft , 33 9 F . 3d81 4, 82 6 (9th C i r. 20 03 ) ( t o p re vai lon an i neff ec t i ve as si st ance of coun se lcl ai m a pet i t i on erm ustdem on strat e pre j ud i ce ). S a la z ar ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s ar e u n av a ilin g . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,415                  58,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,174                  30,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                       450                   1,144
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,155                  90,430
<PP&E>                                          11,768                  13,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,580                   5,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,918                 111,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,033                  25,391
<BONDS>                                          1,325                   1,028
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          2                       0
<COMMON>                                           156                     249
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,402                  85,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,918                 111,801
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,886                  44,198
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,544                  19,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,128                  19,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   248                     611
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  23                    (270)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,943                   5,258
<INCOME-TAX>                                       789                   2,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,154                   3,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,154                   3,192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07                     .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06                     .14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM APRIL 30,
1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,298
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,301
<PP&E>                                           8,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,024
<BONDS>                                         50,012
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,643)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,449
<SALES>                                         24,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,446
<CGS>                                              578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,477)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       572
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,069)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.97)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.
<F2>Amounts have been restated to comply with the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share."
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary information extracted from the annual report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,107
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             695
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,325
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     31,259
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,259
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            31,259
<LOANS>                                         81,728
<ALLOWANCE>                                        801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,554
<DEPOSITS>                                     100,519
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,134
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                596
<LONG-TERM>                                        650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 131,554
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,224
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,755
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   171
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,150
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,218
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,603
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,547
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      105
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  32
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    843
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         843
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     7.7
<LOANS-NON>                                        716
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,651
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   286
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      153
<RECOVERIES>                                        37
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  801
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               194
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            607
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
  /s/ CURTIS H. SMITHCurtis H. SmithChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Murphey *v.*Franklin.

March 9, 1915.

Rehearing denied April 23, 1915.

Processioning. Before Judge Daniel. Pike superior court. July-18, 1914.'

*C. J. Lester,*for plaintiff in error. *E. F. Dupree,*contra.

Beck, J.

Neither the instructions of the court complained of by the plaintiff- in error nor the rulings as to the admissibility of evidence were erroneous for any of the reasons urged. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal of a new trial was not error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Equarn White, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 620] —

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered March 19, 2008, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that he was deprived of a fair trial as a result of the prosecutor eliciting prior consistent statements made by the complainant and her sister, which allegedly bolstered their identification of the defendant as the assailant *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Mack,*89 AD3d 864, 866 [2011]; *People v Parker,*74 AD3d 1365, 1365-1366 [2010]), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see*CPL 470.15 [6]).

“ ‘The right to effective assistance of counsel is guaranteed *1046by the Federal and State Constitutions’ ” *(People v Cason,*90 AD3d 777, 777 [2011], quoting *People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 708 [1988]; *see*US Const Sixth Amend; NY Const, art I, § 6; *People v Bowles,*89 AD3d 171 [2011]). “Under the New York State standard for the effective assistance of counsel, ‘[s]o long as the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of a particular case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that the attorney provided meaningful representation, the constitutional requirement will have been met’ ” *(People v Cason,*90 AD3d at 777, quoting *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; *see People v Bernardez,*85 AD3d 936, 937 [2011]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. Upon reviewing the record, we conclude that counsel provided meaningful representation insofar as he employed “a trial strategy that might well have been pursued by a reasonably competent attorney” *(People v Evans,*16 NY3d 571, 575 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted], *cert denied*565 US —, 132 S Ct 325 [2011]; *see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d at 147; *People v Cason,*90 AD3d at 777; *People v Gerrara,*88 AD3d 811 [2011]; see *also People v Del,*81 AD3d 468, 469 [2011]; *People v Torres,*183 AD2d 862 [1992]). Further, the defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel under the United States Constitution (see *Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). Angiolillo, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur.
#### Harry Leslie, Respondent, v Jack Sommers et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents. Westinghouse Elevator Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., (1) the third-party defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated July 29, 1985, as, upon the court’s granting of the plaintiffs motion for judgment during trial against the defendants third-party plaintiffs on the issue of liability and the defendants third-party plaintiffs’ motion for judgment during trial against the third-party defendant on the issue of liability, and upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages, is in favor of the defendants *717third-party plaintiffs and against it in the principal sum of $60,000, and (2) the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same judgment as is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $60,000.

Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the plaintiff’s motion for judgment during trial against the defendants third-party plaintiffs on the issue of liability denied and a new trial granted, limited to the issue of liability on the plaintiff’s complaint against the defendants third-party plaintiffs.

The issues raised on this appeal and cross appeal are limited by the briefs to the propriety of the trial court’s granting of the plaintiff’s motion for judgment during trial *(see,*CPLR 4401) against the defendants third-party plaintiffs on the issue of liability. The parties do not challenge either the trial court’s disposition of the defendant third-party plaintiffs’ motion or the award of damages, except insofar as liability was apportioned in reliance on the granting of the plaintiff’s motion. Having so defined the issues raised for our review, we find that the trial court erred in granting the plaintiff’s motion for judgment during trial. Viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, as we must, the testimony and other evidence adduced at the trial presented questions of fact on the issues of the negligence of the defendants third-party plaintiffs and the plaintiff’s contributory negligence which should have been submitted to the jury for resolution *(see, McCloud v Marcantonio,*106 AD2d 493). We, therefore, grant a new trial in order that a jury may determine the issue of liability on the plaintiff’s complaint against the defendants third-party plaintiffs. In the event that judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff at the new trial, the award calculated by the jury in the damages phase of the previous trial should be utilized as a proper measure of damages, to which any apportionment of fault determined by the jury at the new trial should be applied *(see,*CPLR art 14-A), and the judgment in favor of the defendants third-party plaintiffs against the third-party defendant should be reinstated accordingly. Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.