alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.01
 HARTFORD LIFE, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hartford Life, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions
contained in SEC Release 34-47986];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Thomas M. MarraThomas M. MarraPresident and Chief Operating Officer
 59
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1056 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1056

To provide for farm-related exemptions from certain hazardous materials 
                      transportation requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 1997

   Mr. Burns (for himself, Mr. Coats, and Mr. Lugar) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for farm-related exemptions from certain hazardous materials 
                      transportation requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FARM-RELATED EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 
              TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--No provision of a final rule relating to the 
intrastate transportation of hazardous materials issued by the 
Secretary of Transportation under the rulemaking proceeding under 
docket number HM-200 that prohibits a State from granting an exemption 
for not-for-hire intrastate transportation by farmers and farm-related 
service industries shall take effect with respect to that not-for-hire 
intrastate transportation before the date specified in subsection (b).
    (b) Date.--The date specified in this subsection is the later of--
            (1) October 1, 1999; or
            (2) the date on which funds are authorized to be 
        appropriated for fiscal year 1998 to carry out chapter 51 of 
        title 49, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2804

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Luis Manuel Garcia-Moreno, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 6, 2001 Filed: July 26, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Luis Manuel Garcia-Moreno pleaded guilty to a one-count indictment charging him with being found in the United States after deportation, see 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (1994 & Supp. IV 1998). At sentencing, Garcia-Moreno moved for a downward departure based on the effect of his deportable-alien status on the conditions of his incarceration. The District Court 1 denied the motion and sentenced Garcia-Moreno to forty-three months' imprisonment and three years of supervised release. On appeal, counsel has-2-

filed a brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing only that the District Court erred in refusing to depart. Garcia-Moreno has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
We do not have authority to review a district court’s discretionary decision to deny a departure. S ee United States v. Correa , 167 F.3d 414, 417 (8th Cir. 1999). Moreover, a district court lacks authority to depart downward based on a defendant's deportable-alien status. United States v. Cardosa-Rodriguez , 241 F.3d 613, 614 (8th Cir. 2001) (holding that defendant's alien status is an element of the crime defined by § 1326 and thus cannot be a factor not adequately considered by the Sentencing Commissionin formulating the applicable sentencing guideline, U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 (2000)). Accordingly, the District Court as a matter of law had no discretion to exercise in denying the downward-departure motion. Following our independent review, see Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Fuce, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), both rendered November 7, 1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under *617indictment No. 846/83, and attempted burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 1303/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OFTG THERAPEUTICS, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of TG Therapeutics, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Michael S. Weiss, Executive Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:





1)  The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Date: March 21,
2017

/s/ Michael S.
WeissMichael S.
WeissExecutive
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and  PresidentPrincipal
Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIS FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          92,521
<SECURITIES>                                     4,759
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,389
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,090
<PP&E>                                          12,660
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,289
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,222
<SALES>                                         39,741
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,343
<CGS>                                              775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   467
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                       623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,455
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02<F2>
        
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
<F2>AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATEMENT OF
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE."
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         215,801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  967,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (204,249)
<INVENTORY>                                    164,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,313,041
<PP&E>                                         530,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,890,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,237,294
<BONDS>                                      1,470,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           198
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,890,529
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,331,151
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,047,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (771,782)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (78,040)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (693,742)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (95,988)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (30,885)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (820,615)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.42)


</TABLE>
# The Attorney General of Texas July 9, 1979 MARK WHITE Attorney General

John W.Holcombe, D.V.M. Opinion No. MW- 31 Executive Director Texas Animal Health Commission Re: Whether the executive P. 0. Box12966 Austin, Texas 787U director of the Texas Animal Health Commission is required to be aveterinarian. Dear Dr. Holcombe: You have asked if the executive director of the Texas Animal Health Commission isrequired to be aveterinarian. Article i’O14f-l,V.T.C.S., provides inpart: Section 23. The [Animal Health] Commission is hereby authorized to employ a Chief Veterinarian, a first assistant and as many Assistant Veterinarians as maybe necessary; also, such other persons as may be necessary for the enforcement of the provisions of this Act, and other Live Stock Sanitary Acts; also, clerks, stenographers, chief clerk and all necessary clerical help. See also V.T.C.S. art. 7014~1, 531(commission authorized to employ a chief veterinarian and assistant veterinarians for the eradication and control of contagious, infectious, and communicable diseases oflivestock). The term “executive director” does not appear in the statutes relating to the Animal Health Commission, although there is a line item appropriation for an executive director. Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 872, at 2836. Material which you have furnished us indicates that although the executive director has also served aschief veterinarian from 1956until the present, for the 20 years prior to 1956, the chief administrative officer was not a veterinarian. In light of the absence of any statutory requirement that the chief administrative officer of the Animal Health Commission also be the chief veterinarian and inlight of the past practice ofhaving adirector who isnot

p. 95John W.Holcombe, D.V.M. - Page Two (HK-31)

chief veterinarian, it is our opinion that the executive director of the Animal Health Commission isnot required to be a veterinarian. Of course, a non-veterinarian employed as executive director may not act aschief veterinarian. SUMMARY The Executive Director of the Texas Animal Health Commission is not required tobe aveterinarian.

MARK WHITE Attorney General ofTexas JOHN W.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General TEDL.HARTLEY Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared by C. Robert Heath Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE C. Robert Heath, Chairman David B.Brooks Austen Furse Susan Garrison BobGauss Rick Gilpin William GReid Bruce Youngblood

p. 96
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
condensed balance sheet of Regent Assisted Living, Inc. as of December 31, 1999,
and the related  statement  of  operations  for the twelve  months in the period
ended  December 31, 1999,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         4,537,839
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    995,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                      37,000
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,500,793
<PP&E>                                        49,558,886
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,657,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                62,686,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,073,642
<BONDS>                                       41,275,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      10,619,349
<OTHER-SE>                                   (25,279,795)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  62,686,363
<SALES>                                       53,635,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              54,089,015
<CGS>                                         38,605,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 60,760,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,645,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (8,776,376)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (8,776,376)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (8,776,376)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (2.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (2.03)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 341 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 341

   Designating the first full week of December in 2011 as ``National 
                         Christmas Tree Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 30, 2011

Mr. Merkley (for himself, Mr. Burr, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Murray, 
Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Casey, Ms. Cantwell, and Ms. Collins) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the first full week of December in 2011 as ``National 
                         Christmas Tree Week''.

Whereas Christmas trees are grown in all 50 States;
Whereas Christmas trees have been sold commercially in the United States since 
        about 1850;
Whereas Edward Johnson, assistant to Thomas Edison, came up with the idea of 
        electric lights for Christmas trees in 1882;
Whereas President Calvin Coolidge started the National Christmas Tree Lighting 
        ceremony on the White House lawn in 1923;
Whereas there are close to 15,000 farms growing Christmas trees in the United 
        States;
Whereas there are approximately 100,000 people employed full or part-time in the 
        Christmas tree industry;
Whereas Christmas tree farms in the United States planted approximately 
        35,000,000 Christmas trees in 2011 to replace those harvested in 2010; 
        and
Whereas growing Christmas trees preserves green space and small family-owned 
        farms, provides habitats for wildlife, and sequesters carbon dioxide: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the first full week of December in 2011 as 
        ``National Christmas Tree Week'';
            (2) encourages the celebration of Christmas trees during 
        that week;
            (3) recognizes the role Christmas trees have played in the 
        history of the United States;
            (4) reaffirms the environmental benefits of Christmas tree 
        farms and recycled Christmas trees;
            (5) encourages the recycling of Christmas trees after the 
        holiday season; and
            (6) celebrates the joy Christmas trees bring to families 
        across the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Informational Addendum to Report on Form 10-K

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of OYO Geospace Corporation does hereby certify as follows:

Solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may
be applicable to this Report on Form 10-K, the undersigned hereby certifies that this Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OYO Geospace Corporation.



/s/ Thomas T. McEntireName: Thomas T. McEntireTitle:   Chief Financial OfficerDecember 6, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.113



                      EXTENSION LETTER FOR PROMISSORY NOTES
                          DATED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998


         This Extension Letter hereby amends that certain Promissory Note dated
as of July 31, 1997 for $20,800.00, by and between American Artists Film
Corporation (therein called "Obligor") and J. Eric Van Atta, (therein called
"Holder") and extends the due date of said Promissory Note for a period of 365
days with all principal and any accrued but unpaid interest due on or before
December 31, 1999.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Extension Letter to
be duly executed under the seal on the date and year first above written.

                                         "OBLIGOR"



                                         By:     /s/ ROBERT MARTINEZ
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           American Artists Film Corporation
                                           1245 Fowler St., N.W.
                                           Atlanta, Georgia 30318

"HOLDER"



    /s/ J. ERIC VAN ATTA              
------------------------------------
       J. Eric Van Atta