alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
rovr-ex41_116.htm



Exhibit 4.1

 



 

Number CA-«Cert_No»*«Numerical_Shares»* Shares Class A Common Stock   THIS CERTIFIES THAT *«Name»* is the record holder of («Written_Shares») *«Numerical_Shares»* shares of Class A Common Stock of  ROVER GROUP INC. a Delaware corporation  transferable only on the records of the corporation upon surrender of this certificate, properly endorsed or assigned.  This certificate and the shares it represents are subject to the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the corporation, and any amendments thereto, as well as the restrictive legends on the back of this certificate. The corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement describing the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.  The corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers as of «Date», 20 .    SecretaryPresident 





 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, I HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER _ SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE TO AND HEREBY IRREVOCABLY APPOINT AS ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THESE SHARES ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE CORPORATION.  DATED    (Stockholder)   (Witness)(Stockholder)  NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND EXACTLY WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN ON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE.  [INSERT THE LEGENDS FROM THE DOCUMENT(S) PERTAINING TO THE ISSUANCE OF THESE SHARES, INCLUDING WITH RESPECT TO ANY APPLICABLE TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS IN THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS]
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1120 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1120

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
       To provide for a consultant for the President pro tempore.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 101(a) of 
the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1977 (2 U.S.C. 61h-6(a)) is 
amended by inserting after the first sentence the following: ``The 
President pro tempore of the Senate is authorized to appoint and fix 
the compensation of 1 consultant, on a temporary or intermittent basis, 
at a daily rate of compensation not in excess of that specified in the 
first sentence of this subsection.''.

            Passed the Senate July 31, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1120

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

       To provide for a consultant for the President pro tempore.
```
Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 4  Filed: 09/25/03 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:67

Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 4  Filed: 09/25/03 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:68

Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 4  Filed: 09/25/03 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:69

Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 4  Filed: 09/25/03 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:70

Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 4  Filed: 09/25/03 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:71

Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 4  Filed: 09/25/03 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:72

Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 4  Filed: 09/25/03 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:73

Case: 1:03-cv-05733 Document #: 4  Filed: 09/25/03 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:74
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:2
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:3
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:4
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:5
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:6
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:7
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:8
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:9
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:10
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:11
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:12
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:13
Case: 1:01-cv-04073 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/01 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:14
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:* National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; Exploiting Genome or Epigenome Editing to Functionally Validate Genes or Variants       ( print page 41985)    Involved in Substance Use Disorders (R21/R33 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).

*Date:* September 23, 2021.

*Time:* 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.

*Agenda:* To review and evaluate grant applications.

*Place:* National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).

*Contact Person:* Ipolia R. Ramadan, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Policy and Review, Division of Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-4471, *ramadanir@mail.nih.gov*.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 30, 2021. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-16608 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHYVAS ARIEL PEOPLES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-475

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed October 5, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Nick Nazaretian, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

444444444444444

NO. 03-05-00480-CV

444444444444444

Antique Outlet Centers, LLC and Scott Gregson

d/b/a Gregson’s Antiques, Appellants

v.

Carol M. Williams, Appellee

44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 04-1164, HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants Antique Outlet Centers, LLC and Scott Gregson d/b/a Gregson’s

Antiques and appellee Carol M. Williams filed an agreed motion to abate this appeal, asserting that

the parties have scheduled mediation for November 17, 2005. We grant the motion and abate this

appeal until November 30. In light of the abatement and the parties’ agreement, appellants’ briefs

will be due in this Court on December 1, 2005.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Filed: November 2, 2005
#### In the Matter of Laqua’sha Renee G. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Sheila Renee M., Appellant; Little Flower Children and Family Services, Respondent.

[943 NYS2d 47]

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about April 4, 2011, which, upon fact-finding determinations of permanent neglect and abandonment, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject children and committed the children’s guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence established that the children were permanently neglected within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b (7) (a). Despite petitioner’s diligent efforts to strengthen and encourage the parent-child relationship by, among other things, formulating a service plan, scheduling visits with the children, and referring respondent to various programs and courses, respondent failed to complete drug treatment and parenting skills programs or to attend individual counseling, failed to follow through with any of the referrals made, and continually failed to attend meetings and scheduled visitation at the agency *(see Matter of Fernando Alexander B. [Simone Anita W.],*85 AD3d 658, 659 [2011]). Moreover, notwithstanding the fact that respondent spoke with the children via telephone on a regular basis, her failure, during the six months immediately prior to the filing of the petitions, to visit the children or maintain contact with the agency, although she was able to do so and was not prevented or discouraged from doing so by the agency, gave rise to a presumption of abandonment that respondent did not rebut *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [5] [a]; *Matter of Chaka F.,*220 AD2d 310 [1995]).

A preponderance of the evidence showed that the best interests of the children would be served by terminating respondent’s parental rights so as to facilitate their adoption *(see Matter of Star Leslie*W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]). Respondent’s frequency of contact with the children has *626decreased and she still has not completed any of the remedial programs required by the service plan. Meanwhile, the eldest child has since aged out of foster care, and the younger children, now in their teens, have been in a loving and stable home for nearly four years, and they and their foster mother share the mutual desire that they be adopted. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Cathleen Strand-O’Shea, Respondent, v William Kraemer, Appellant. (Proceeding Nos. 1 and 2.) In the Matter of William Kraemer, Appellant, v Cathleen Strand-O’Shea, Respondent. (Proceeding Nos. 3 and 4.)

[949 NYS2d 65]

— In four related custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), dated February 17, 2010, as dismissed (a) his petition to modify a prior order of the same court dated November 6, 2007, inter alia, awarding the mother sole custody of the parties’ child, so as to award sole custody of the subject child to him, and (b) his separate petition to hold the mother in contempt for violating the visitation schedule set forth in the prior order.

Ordered that the order dated February 17, 2010, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

“ ‘Modification of an existing custody arrangement is permissible only upon a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that a modification is necessary to ensure the continued best interests and welfare of the child’ ” *(Matter of Ross v Ross,*86 AD3d 615, 616 [2011], quoting *Matter of Pignataro v Davis,*8 AD3d 487, 488 [2004]; *see*Family Ct Act § 652; *Matter of Buxenbaum v Fulmer,*82 AD3d 1223, 1223 [2011]; *Matter of Gallo v Gallo,*81 AD3d 826, 827 [2011]; *Matter of Watson v Smith,*52 AD3d 615, 616 [2008]). Here, the Family Court properly dismissed the father’s petition to modify a prior order so as to award sole custody of the subject child to him, as he failed to demonstrate the requisite change in circumstances.

Moreover, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in dismissing the father’s petition to hold the mother in contempt for violating the visitation provisions of the prior order, which awarded custody to the mother and visitation to him *(see generally Matter of Philie v Singer,*79 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2010]; *Matter of Kraemer v Strand-O’Shea,*66 AD3d 901, 901 [2009]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
May 22, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.P., A Child

NO. 14-11-00164-CV

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee HENRY KOHL, signed 

December 13, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the 

record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order that the portions of the 

judgment relating to the petition to modify child support and the counter-petition to 

modify child support are REVERSED and ordered severed and REMANDED for 

proceedings in accordance with this court’s opinion. Further, we order the remainder of 

the judgment AFFIRMED, including the order denying recovery on appellant LIANE 

POELL’S fraudulent-inducement claim and the orders regarding possession of and access 

to A.M.P. We order appellee HENRY KOHL to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   649
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,025
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,128
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,021
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,370)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.3





 Exhibit 10.3 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective as of July 26, 2021, attaches to and forms part of that
certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 16, 2015, as amended on April 20, 2018 (the “Agreement”), among Aon Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Aon plc, a public limited
company organized under Irish law (the “Parent”), and Gregory C. Case (the “Executive”). Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. 

WHEREAS, the parties mutually desire to extend the Employment Period for three years as provided in this Amendment. 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements contained herein, the parties hereby agree as
follows:     
  

	 	1.	 The phrase “April 1, 2023” where it appears in Section 1 of the Agreement shall be replaced with
“April 1, 2026.” 


  

	 	2.	 The remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in effect. 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date set forth above. 

 

					
	AON CORPORATION	 		 	EXECUTIVE
			
	 /s/ Lisa Stevens
	 		 	 /s/ Gregory C. Case

	Lisa Stevens	 		 	Gregory C. Case
	Executive Vice President &	 		 	CEO, Aon plc
	Chief People Officer	 		 	CEO, Aon Corporation
			
	AON plc	 		 	
			
	 /s/ Lisa Stevens
	 		 	
	Lisa Stevens	 		 	
	 Executive Vice President &
 Chief
People Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,975,055
<SECURITIES>                                    94,766
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,445,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    722,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,342,864
<PP&E>                                         430,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,147,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,873,577
<BONDS>                                      1,025,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          456,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,155
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,263,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,147,761
<SALES>                                      4,014,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,014,768
<CGS>                                        2,360,791
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,360,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,420,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,019,592)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,400,467)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,400,467)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

** **

In connection with theAnnual Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Osterman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the report.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 
| Date: March 13,  2008 |
|----------------------------|

 
|                    |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ James S. Osterman   |   |
| James S. Osterman       |
| Chairman and            |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Walgreens, Appellant, v Board of Assessment Review of Town of Irondequoit et al., Respondents.

[942 NYS2d 851]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered November 16, 2010. The order granted the motion of respondents to preclude petitioner from submitting trial-ready appraisals and from offering expert testimony on the value of the subject property.

Now, upon the judgment and order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, entered March 2, 2012, approving the settlement agreement signed by the attorneys for the parties on January 26, 2012 and February 15, 2012, discontinuing the proceedings,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

All concur except Green, J., who is not participating. Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.