alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3012314-MAR-201308:57 AM
# Official Journal C 23/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 23 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5922 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 23

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5922 January 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 23/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7671 — KKR/FIBA/WMF) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 23/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7855 — Ageas/AXA Portugal) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 23/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7872 — Novartis/GSK (Ofatumumab Autoimmune Indications)) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 23/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7671 — KKR/FIBA/WMF) (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 23/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7855 — Ageas/AXA Portugal) (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 23/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7872 — Novartis/GSK (Ofatumumab Autoimmune Indications)) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 23/04 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| 2016/C 23/05 | New national side of euro coins intended for circulation | 4 |
| 2016/C 23/06 | New national side of euro coins intended for circulation | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 23/04

Euro exchange rates

3

2016/C 23/05

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

4

2016/C 23/06

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 23/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7869 — Macquarie/Dolomiti Energia/Hydro Dolomiti Enel) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 23/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7869 — Macquarie/Dolomiti Energia/Hydro Dolomiti Enel) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

November 3, 2003

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
Hartford Life, Inc.
Hartford, Connecticut

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Hartford Life, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") for the
periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, as indicated in our report dated
November 3, 2003; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended September
30, 2003, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-28805
and 333-28807 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-21865 and
333-56283 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Genetics Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Crop Genetics Research People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications

Salliana  Stetina

(Sally)    Supervisory Plant Physiologist Crop Genetics Research Unit 141 Experiment Station Road PO Box 345 Stoneville, MS 38776 Office: 662.686.5476 Fax: 662.686.5218


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 11, 2005 (the "Report"), I, John E. Gherty, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       By  /s/ John E. Gherty
                                           -----------------------
                                       John E. Gherty
                                       President
                                       and Chief Executive Officer

                                       41
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jan Dijkstra, Appellant.

—Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kuffner, J.), rendered December 28, 1983, affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 433/15 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 433 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6015 December 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 433

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6015 December 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 433/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 36th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 433/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 36th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Mint Bil gore (0057)

United States District Court, Northern District of Ilinois

Name of Assigned Jud, Sitting Judge if Oth
vor Magistrate Judge James B. Moran than Assigned Judge
CASE NUMBER 03 C 7091 DATE 5/14/2004
CASE MICHELLE LANGEL vs. KMART CORPORATION
TITLE .
[In the following box (a)indicate the party filing the motion, e.g. plaintiff, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the nature
MOTION: of the motion being presented.)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DOCKET ENTRY:
q@ oOo Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]
(2) o Brief in support of motion due
(3) o Answer brief to motion due . Reply to answer brief due.
(4) Oo Ruling/Hearing on set for at
(5) oO Status hearing[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for] on set for at
(6) Oo Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for] on set for at :
(2) oO Trial[set for/re-set for] on at
(8) Oo [Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continued to at
(9) Oo This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agreement/pursuant to]
OFRCP4(m) ClLocal Rule 41.1 OOFRCP41(a\(1) OFRCP41(a)(2).
qo) i [Other docket entry] Enter Memorandum Opinion And Order. Appellant’s motion for
reconsideration of the appeal is denied. Reconsideration is best addressed to the bankruptcy court.
(il) @ (For further detail see order attached to the original minute order.]
No notices required, advised in open court.
‘No notices required. vue of otics
Notices mailed by judge's staff, MAY L 7 bn
Notified counsel by telephone.
a | Docketing to mail notices.
Mail AO 450 form, aed 1 sa i bya \D
Copy to judge/magistrate judge. Sot
courtroom 2S:y Uy Hy) agit arcz us mated notice
7 deputy’s eS) Md A) AGH ACG2
initials
,, Date/time received in
” ~‘pentral ‘Clerk's\O fice amaling deputy intals

Wea wot domed



f

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION
IN RE: KMART CORPORATION, et al., )
)
)
)
MICHELLE LANGEL, )
)
Plaintiff/Appellant, )
)
vs. ) No. 03 C 7091
)
KMART CORPORATION, )
) Ui)
Defendant/Appellee. ) Ch,
May | N Tt
2004
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Appellant moved, in March, for reconsideration of the appeal from the denial of her
motion to have her claim deemed timely filed. Somehow it got buried, but it has now come to
light. Unfortunately, I must deny the motion. While I am sympathetic to appellant’s plight
and have no reason to doubt her counsel’s good faith, I have very limited review jurisdiction.
The bankruptcy court has had the responsibility of administering a massive bankruptcy well
out of the ordinary run. I cannot, in good faith, determine that the bankruptcy court has
abused its discretion in those circumstances when she required strict adherence to the

applicable time limitations. Reconsideration is best addressed to the bankruptcy court.

R

JAMES B. MORAN
Sehior Judge, U. S. District Court

Ena 14 , 2004.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)            The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:March 9, 2007

/s/ Calvin E. Jenness

Calvin E. Jenness

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

----
Case: 1:03-cv-01269 Document #: 40 Filed: 08/04/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:147

Case: 1:03-cv-01269 Document #: 40 Filed: 08/04/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:148
# C_2008309EN.01S00301.xml

| 4.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.2.3

Eastern Division

David Bourke

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:03−cv−07749

Honorable James B. Zagel

Village of Downers Grove, Illinois, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, September 3, 2009:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable James B. Zagel:Defendants Brucar and

Conger's motion for entry of judgment under Rule 54(b) [78] is denied, without prejudice,

to refiling in 16 weeks.Mailed notice(drw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 80 Filed 09/03/09 Page 1 of 1
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Civil Action No. 18-1457 (TJK/DAR) 

VALENCIA STUBBS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social 

Security, 

Defendant.

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate 

Judge Deborah A. Robinson on March 23, 2020. See ECF No. 21 (“R&R”). The Report and 

Recommendation cautioned the parties that failing to file an objection within 14 days of receipt 

could lead to waiver of the right to further review of the issues addressed. R&R at 15. Neither 

party objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the deadline to do so has passed. See

LCvR 72.3(b). 

Valencia Stubbs brought this action seeking to reverse the final decision of the 

Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Supplemental Security Income 

benefits. See ECF Nos. 1, 10, 13, 21. She alleged that the decision of the Administrative Law 

Judge (ALJ) was not supported by substantial evidence and was erroneous as a matter of law. 

ECF No. 1 ¶ 41; see ECF No. 13. Magistrate Judge Robinson, in a 15-page opinion, determined 

that the ALJ “mischaracterized relevant evidence” when formulating Stubbs’ residual functional 

capacity by “ignoring ‘the limited fashion [she] engages in some of the activities she described.’” 

R&R at 13–14 (quoting Jackson v. Barnhart, 271 F. Supp. 2d 30, 37 (D.D.C. 2002)). For that 
2 

reason, Magistrate Judge Robinson recommended that this Court remand the matter to the Social 

Security Administration for further proceedings. Id. at 15. 

After independent consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the lack of any 

objection, the entire record, and the applicable law, the Court ORDERS that: 

1. The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety; 

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal, ECF No. 13, is GRANTED; 

3. Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance, ECF No. 14, is DENIED; and 

4. This case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further 

proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 

SO ORDERED. 

/s/ Timothy J. Kelly 

TIMOTHY J. KELLY 

United States District Judge 

Date: April 15, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         757,749
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,749,663
<PP&E>                                       1,615,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,055,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,203,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       673,808
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,055,042
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,542
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,350
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002 (the "Report"), I, John E. Gherty,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                                By /s/ John E. Gherty
                                                -----------------------------
                                                        John E. Gherty
                                                           President
                                                  and Chief Executive Officer
#### Levinson *v.*Rosenheim Shoe Company.

June 23, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Graham. Pulaski superior court. June 3, 1914.

*M. II. Boyer*and *II. B.*Coates, for plaintiff in error.

*II. F.*Lawson, contra.

Lumpkin, J.

The question involved was whether a waiver of homestead was a mere general waiver, disconnected from the creation of an indebtedness, so as to fall within the ruling in *Ragan*v. *Taff,*134 *Ga.*835 (68 S. E. 579), or whether the waiver was made in connection with the creation of the indebtedness and contemporaneously therewith, within a proper construction of that expression as used in the Civil Code (1910), § 3413, so as to fall within the ruling in *Pincus*v. *Meinhard,*139 *Ga.*365 (77 S. E. 82). That question was submitted to the jury, who found that the waiver was valid. The evidence authorized such a finding; and no error being complained of in the rulings of the judge pending the trial, a motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, was properly overruled.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 23.1



             Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-172 and Form S-8 No. 333-342) 
pertaining to the Vanguard Airlines, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan 
and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Vanguard Airlines, Inc. 
of our report dated February 22, 1999, with respect to the 
financial statements and schedule of Vanguard Airlines, Inc. 
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended 
December 31, 1998.




                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                     Ernst & Young LLP


Kansas City, Missouri
March 29, 1999