alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Manhattan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. does hereby certify that:

           a)     the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report:) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

           b)     information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Dated: April 11, 2003                    /s/ Leonard Firestone
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Leonard Firestone
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 11, 2003                    /s/ Nicholas J. Rossettos
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Nicholas J. Rossettos
                                         Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 145 (Monday, August 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 41517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16337]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-877]

Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: AMRI 
Rensselaer, Inc.

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: AMRI Rensselaer, Inc., has applied to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before October 1, 2021. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before October 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on May 31, 2021, AMRI Rensselaer Inc., 33 Riverside 
Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144-2951, applied to be registered as a 
bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled 
substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana...............................    7360  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols...................    7370  I
Amphetamine.............................    1100  II
Lisdexamfetamine........................    1205  II
Pentobarbital...........................    2270  II
ANPP (4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-              8333  II
 piperidine).
Codeine.................................    9050  II
Oxycodone...............................    9143  II
Hydromorphone...........................    9150  II
Hydrocodone.............................    9193  II
Morphine................................    9300  II
Fentanyl................................    9801  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the above controlled substances as 
bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) for use in product 
development and for distribution to its customers. In reference to drug 
codes 7360 (Marihuana), and 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company 
plans to bulk manufacture these drugs as synthetic. No other activities 
for these drug codes are authorized for this registration.

William T. McDermott,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-16337 Filed 7-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42014-42015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16640]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 24, 2021 and Wednesday, 
August 25, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(737) 800-4060.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Tuesday, August 24, 2021, from 1:30pm to 3:30pm Eastern 
Time and Wednesday, August 25, 2021, from 1:30pm to 3:30pm Eastern 
Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written 
statements for consideration. For more information please contact 
Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or (737-800-4060), or write TAP 
Office 3651 S. IH-35, STOP 1005 AUSC, Austin, TX 78741, or post 
comments to the website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the

[[Page 42015]]

IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: July 30, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-16640 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document

        

AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE
ENSCO SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004)


    THIS AMENDMENT No. 6 is executed this 30th day of June 2021, and effective as 1 July 2021, by ENSCO International Incorporated, having its principal office in Houston, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Company sponsors the ENSCO Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2004, and as further amended by Amendments No. 1 through 5 thereto (the “SERP”);
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company’s parent, Valaris Limited, a Bermuda exempted company, approved this further amendment to the SERP on 10 June 2021; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to adopt this Amendment No. 6 to the SERP in order to apply a quarterly interest credit to the frozen notional accounts under the SERP in an amount tied to the 10-year U.S. treasury rate.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants herein contained, and in accordance with Section 10.1 of the SERP, the Company hereby adopts the following Amendment No. 6 to the SERP, effective as of 1 July 2021:
1.    A new Section 4.7 is hereby added to the SERP to read as follows:
Effective for the period from 28 April 2021 through 1 July 2021, no amounts, including earnings or losses, shall be credited to any Participant’s Accounts.  Commencing effective as of 1 July 2021, with the first such interest credit applied on September 30, 2021, Participant’s Accounts shall be credited with the quarterly interest credits described in this Section 4.7. As of the last day of each quarter in each calendar year, and as of each distribution date with respect to a Participant in a calendar quarter, each Participant’s Account shall be credited with an interest equivalent based upon the rate of interest paid on ten-year United States treasury notes (as reflected in the United States Federal Reserve’s Statistical Release H.15, or any successor publication) in November of the immediately preceding calendar year and the balances in each Account as of the first day of such quarter.






[Signature page follows.]






        

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its duly authorized officers, has caused this Amendment No. 6 to the amendment and restatement of the SERP to be executed on the date first above written. 
 
			
	
	ENSCO INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
 /s/ Colleen Grable

	
	By: Colleen Grable
	Its: Vice President and Secretary
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 00-4250



#  A NTWAN L EROY B ROADIE , a/k/a Antwan Leroy Brodie,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham.

William L. Osteen, District Judge.

(CR-99-151) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 14, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Antwan Leroy Broadie appeals his conviction and sentence imposed for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(e)(1) (West 2000). He challenges the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress and the armed career criminal enhancement to his sentence. We affirm. During the suppression hearing, the district court made a credibility determination that part of the firearm was visible above the waistband of Broadie’s pants, and therefore, the officers had probable cause to arrest Broadie. It is the role of the district court to observe witnessesand weigh the credibility of witnesses during pretrial motions to suppress. United States v. Murray , 65 F.3d 1161, 1169 (4th Cir. 1995). We accord deference to these findings. Id. Finding no clear error in the district court’s determination, we affirm the denial of the motion to suppress and hence affirm Broadie’s conviction. See United States v. Seidman , 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir. 1998) (providing standard). Broadie also challenges his classification and sentencing as an armed career criminal. He asserts that the predicate offenses occurred when he was seventeen years old and were the result of a serious drug addiction. Because Broadie possessed a firearm after having been convicted of at least three prior qualifying "crimes of violence," see United States v. Bowden , 975 F.2d 1080, 1085 (4th Cir. 1992), the district court did not err in overruling his objection and sentencing Broadie as an armed career criminal under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(e)(1).Accordingly, we affirm Broadie’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B ROADIE
#### Harold Glantz et al., Doing Business as H.G.V. Associates, et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Appellant.

*499Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered on April 17, 1984, and the judgment of said court entered thereon on April 20, 1984, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment directing the payment of additional interest on condemnation awards made to them pursuant to a final decree of the Supreme Court in Queens County, are unanimously reversed, on the law, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint granted and plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment denied, without costs or disbursements.

The situation presented here is virtually identical to that involved in *Adventurers Whitestone Corp. v City of New York*(65 NY2d 83), wherein the Court of Appeals concluded that the claimant was precluded from litigating in a second action an issue which it could have raised in the condemnation proceeding. Consequently, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint should be granted. Concur&emdash;Sandler, J. P., Milonas, Kassal, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
**Exhibit 23.02****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-49494) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1997Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56654) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement(Form S-8 Nos. 333-77052, 333-104100, and 333-188048) pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Planand the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-89220)pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Transmeta Corporation of our report datedMarch 25, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Transmeta Corporationincluded in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPSan Jose,California
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          20,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,131
<PP&E>                                      16,620,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,671,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,166
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,671,842
<SALES>                                         74,231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,231
<CGS>                                            7,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,214
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,214
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-24-00412-CR

Christopher ACOSTA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2024CR1657

Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED September 4, 2024.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Exhibit
      32 -
            Certification
      of Principal Executive and Acting Principal Financial
Officer





CERTIFICATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Internet America, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William E. Ladin, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ William E. Ladin,
Jr.William
      E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr.Chief
      Executive Officer and Acting ChiefFinancial
      OfficerDate:
      September 23, 2010
#### The United States, Plaintiffs in error, *v.*Nine Cases of Silk Hats. Paul Tricon, Claimant.

The decision iitthe preceding case again affirmed.

This ease was brought up, by writ of error, from the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisianá.

It was similar, in its circumstances, to the case of the United States *v.*Sixty-seven Packages of Dry Goods, and argued by *Mr.*Cushing, attorney-general, for the United States, at the same time.

Mr. Justice NELSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a libel of information, filed in the district court of the United States *v.*Nine Cases of Silk Hats, for condemnation and forfeiture, on the allegation that the entry of the goods at the custom-house, was made upon an invoice, in which they were invoiced at a less sum than the actual cost at the place of exportation, with a design to evade the duties.

After hearing the-evidence, the court instructed the jury that the 66th section of the act of 1799, which imposed a forfeiture of the goods in question, had been repealed, and was not in force at the time of the entry at the customs ; and gave judgment for the claimant. On a writ of error to the circuit courts this judgment was affirmed.

'For the reasons given in the case of the United States *v.*Sixty-seven Packages of Dry Goods, the judgment must be reverséd, and the record remitted to the court below for further proceedings, in conformity to the opinion of this court.

Mr. Justice CAMPBELL dissented.

*Order.*

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby reversed, and that this cause be and the same is hereby remanded to the said circuit court for further proceedings to be had therein in conformity to the opinion of this court.
## T RIAL 

## C OURT 

## O FFICIAL 

## ’ S



## R EQUEST FOR 

## E XTENSION OF 

## T IME TO 

## F ILE 

## R ECORD

Fax to Cathy S. Lusk, 12 th Court of Appeals, Tyler, T X . Fax # (903) 593

- 2193

Court of Appeals No. (If Known): 12

- 15

- 00121

- CV

Trial Court Style: GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D. ROLLINS V S TEXAS COLLEGE AND

MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A “A

- 1 RENT ALL”

Trial Court & County: 7 TH

Trial Court No.: 13

- 3353

- A

Date Trial Clerk’s Record Originally Due: 06/22/2015

Date Court Reporter’s/Recorder’s Record Origin ally Due:

Anticipated Number of Pages of Record: 29 VOLUMES

I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal but I am unable to file the record by the original

due date for the following reason(s): ( check all that apply

– attach additional pages if necessary)

T o the best of my knowledge, the Appellant has made no claim of indigence and has failed to

either pay the required fee or to make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record.

My duties listed below preclude working on this record:

x Other, ( Explain) : DUE TO UNFORSEEN REASONS, I HAVE BEEN OUT AND UNABLE TO COMPLETE THE RECORD.

I anticipate this record will be completed and forwarded to the 12 th Court of Appeals by 08

- 30

- 2015

, And I hereby request an additiona l 45 days within which to prepare the record.

T EX .R.A PP .P.37.3.

In compliance with T EX .R.A PP .P.9.5 (e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on counsel

for all parties to the Trial Court’s judgment or order being appealed. I further cert ify by my signature

below that the information contained in this notice is true and within my personal knowledge.

Date: 0 5

- 12

- 15 /S/ LINDA RHYMES

/S/ LINDA RHYMES

Office Phone Number: 903

- 590

- 1772 LINDA RHYMES

(Printed Name)

APPEALS CLERK

(Official Title)

T EXAS R ULE OF A PPELLATE P ROCEDURE 9.5 (e) reads:Certificate requirements: A certificate of service must be signed by the person who ma de

the service and must state:

(1) the date and manner of service;

(2) the name and address of each person served; and

(3) if the person served is a party’s attorney, the name of the party represented by that

attorney.

The following parties have been served with a copy of this document:

Lead Counsel for A PPELLANT ( S ): Lead Counsel for A PPELLEE ( S ):

Name: ERNESTO SIGMON

. Name: MR. TREY YARBROUGH

Address: SIGMON LAW, PLLC Address: Y ARBROUGH WILCOX , PLLC

2929 A LLEN PARKWAY

HOUSTON , TEXAS 77019 100 E. FERGUSON , S TE

. 1015

T YLER , TEXAS 75702

Phone #: 832.871.5723 Phone #: 903.595.3111 FAX 903.595.0191

214.395.1546

Attorney For: GARRY L. ROLLINS AND

CARLA ROLLINS Attorney For: TEXAS COLLEGE

Name: RYAN K. GEDDIE

MARTIN, DISIERE,

JEFFERSON & WISDOM, LLP

TOLLWAY PLAZA ONE

16000 N. DALLAS PARKWAY,

SUITE. 800

DALLAS, TEXAS 75248

Phone #: 214.420.5500 FAX 214.420.5501

Attorne y For: MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

“ A1

- RENT ALL ”
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Emery E. Skarupa, Vice President of
Operations of SpaceDev, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best
of their knowledge:

         The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2
(the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
this 14th day of November 2002.



                                            /s/ Emery E. Skarupa
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Emery E. Skarupa
                                            VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS