alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         624,130
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,276,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,233,393
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,454,610
<PP&E>                                       1,489,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                 782,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,470,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,604,061
<BONDS>                                        326,976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   (6,473,672)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,470,947
<SALES>                                     53,366,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            53,366,171
<CGS>                                       55,487,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,268,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             206,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,403,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,547,840)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,950,262)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,950,262)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.23)


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research: Mississippi State, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Mississippi State, Mississippi Crop Science Research Laboratory Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research People & Locations







Evita  Lopez
                        Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (662) 320-7380
                        
                        
                        Fax: (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marian Tudor, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 578]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), rendered November 30, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Angiolillo, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 52 Filed: 02/03/03 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:342
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 52 Filed: 02/03/03 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:343
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 52 Filed: 02/03/03 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:344
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 52 Filed: 02/03/03 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:345
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EGL, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:

March 1, 2007

By:

/s/ James R. Crane



James R. Crane

Chief Executive Officer





Date:

March 1, 2007

By:

/s/ Charles H. Leonard



Charles H. Leonard

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EGL, Inc. and will be retained by EGL, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research: Wenatchee, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Wenatchee, Washington Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- ARS News Articles

Yanmin  Zhu    Molecular Biologist (Plants)  Research Program Maximized exploitation of plant natural resistance to manage soilborne diseases, such as apple replant disease, is critical for reducing the soil input of chemical fumigants which negatively impact human health and environment. This research program is to understand the genetic controls and molecular mechanisms in roots of apple (or other tree fruit) as they are challenged with soilborne pathogens. Various functional genomics approaches are utilized to identify and validate specific apple genes for their regulatory roles contributing to disease resistance in apple root to soilborne necrotrophic replant pathogens. [BACK]


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit      32.1 -**
**Certification      of Principal Executive Officer**

**CERTIFICATION      IN ACCORDANCE WITH**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                        |                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                                                             | /s/              William E. Ladin, Jr. |
|   | William                E. (Billy) Ladin, Jr. Chief                Executive Officer Date:                September 27, 2007 |

----
NO. 07

- 12

- 00187

- CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL A SEPTEMBER 20 , 2012

IN THE INTEREST OF T.R.M., A CHILD

FROM THE 223RD DISTRICT COURT OF GRAY COUNTY; NO. 36,443 ; HONORABLE JACK GRAHAM, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, C.L.M. 1 , appeals an order of the trial court terminating his parental rights to T.R.M., his five year old son. C.L.M’s appointed counsel has filed a brief in conformity with And ers v. California rendering her professional opinion that any issue that could be raised on appeal is frivolous and without legal merit. See 386 U.S.738, 87 S.Ct . 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). C.L.M.’s counsel avers that she has zealously reviewed the record in this matter and can find no arguable points of appeal. Counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and provided C.L.M. with a copy of the brief. Further,

coun sel has advised C.L.M. that he has the right to file a pro se response to the Anders

1 To protect the parent’s and child’s privacy, we refer to them by initials. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 109.002(d) (West 2012); T EX

. R. A PP

. 9.8(b).2 brief. The Court has likewise advised C.L.M. of this right. C.L.M. has not favored the Court with a response.
This Court has long held that an appointed attorney in a termination case might discharge his professional duty to his client by filing a brief in conformity with the Anders
process. See In re A.W.T. , 61 S.W.3d 87, 88

- 89 (Tex.App.

— Amarillo 2001, no pet.). Likewise, other intermediate appellate courts have so h eld. See Sanchez v. Tex. Dep’t of Family and Protective Servs. , No. 03

- 10

- 00249

- CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2162, at *1, Tex.App.

— Austin March 24, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re L.K.H , No. 11

- 10

- 00080

- CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 1706, at *2

- 4, Tex.App

— Eastlan d March 10, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re D.D. , 279 S.W.3d 849, 849

- 50 (Tex.App.

— Dallas 2009, pet. denied); In re D.E.S. , 135 S.W.3d 326, 326

- 27 (Tex.App.

— Houston [14 th Dist.] 2004, no pet.).

We have conducted our own review of the record in this matte r and have come to the conclusion that there are no arguable points of appeal. See In re A.W.T. , 61 S.W.3d at 89. We, therefore, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. We remind counsel that C.L.M. has the right to file a pro se petition for review to the Texas Supreme Court. Finally, having found no arguable points of appeal requiring reversal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice
#### PETER F. KENDALL v. THE UNITED STATES.

*(107 U.*S. R., 123, on appeal from 14 C. Cls. R., 122, 374.)

The claimant’s cause of action accrued more than six years before the filing of the petition in the Court of Claims. To avoid the statute of limitations the claimant alleged' that until the proclamation of general pardon and amnesty issued by the President, December 25, 1868, he was under disability, in that, having been connected with the rebellion, he could not allege in his petition and make oath that he “had at all times bore true faith and allegiance to the Government of the United States, and that he *759' had not in any way voluntarily aided, abetted, or given encouragement to rebellion against the said Government^” as required by statute (now Eev. Stat., § 1072).

Held by the Supreme Court:

The court, in view of the language of the statute of limitations, cannot exclude *from*computation, on the issue of limitation, the time intervening, between the accruing of a claim and the promulgation of the amnesty proclamation:-

The judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing the petition was affirmed on substantially the same grounds as given by the court below.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Harlan.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Orders & ServicesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes People & Locations







Salvador  Rivas, Jr.
                        Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician (Plants)
                        Phone: (530) 752-6763
                        
                        
                        Fax: (530) 752-5974(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

UFE INCORPORATED,

 Appellant,

v.

NETTA DODDS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-07-00272-CV

Appeal from the

171st Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2004-3717) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P.

42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties represent in their motion that they have reached an agreement to settle

and compromise their differences and request that this Court vacate the trial court’s judgment

without regard to the merits, and remand the case to the trial court for entry of an order

dismissing the case with prejudice.

This Court has the authority to set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the

merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the

agreements. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Having considered the cause on the parties’ motion,

we conclude the motion should be granted. We hereby set aside the trial court’s judgment and

remand the case for entry of an order of dismissal with prejudice in accordance with the parties’

agreement. As the motion does not specify that the parties have agreed otherwise, costs of appeal

will be taxed against Appellant. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d).
-2-

April 30, 2009

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 99


                                  CERTIFICATION



      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of CVF
Technologies Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   August 14, 2002                     /s/ Jeffrey I. Dreben
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Jeffrey I. Dreben,
                                             Chief Executive Officer




Dated:   August 14, 2002                     /s/ Robert L. Miller
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Robert L. Miller,
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.3

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, George J. Carter, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
      Franklin Street Properties Corp.; and

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report.


Date: July 29, 2004                     /s/ George J. Carter
                                        --------------------
                                        George J. Carter
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT
ROYAL PALM CHIROPRACTIC & REHAB CENTER, P.A. a/a/o EMILY HANSEN , Appellant,

v.

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 148
[ July 14, 2021 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteen Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Edward A. Garrison , Judge ; L.T. Case No s

. 50

- 2017

- SC

009430

- XXXX

- MB and 50

- 2019

- AP

- 000085

- CAXX

- MB

. Jonathan Phillips of Florida Litigators, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appell ant

. Michael A. Rosenberg, Peter D. Weinstein and Adrianna de la Cruz

Muñoz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Based on our decision in G eico Indem nity Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic P.A. , No. 4D21

- 457 , 2021 WL 2584107 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 2021) , we reverse the final judgment in favor of Geico and remand for the entry of a final judgment in favor of appellant in the amount of $1.22

.
Reversed and remanded.

G ROSS , M AY and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Ladd, Principal Financial Officer of MGT Capital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ ROBERT LADDRobert LaddPrincipal Financial OfficerApril 15, 2011




E-80