alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.1**

** **

**SUBSIDIARIES OFMEDICSIGHT, INC.**

 
| **Name of  Subsidiary**              | ** ** | **Jurisdiction  of Organization** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                 |       |                              |
| Medicsight PLC                       |       | England and  Wales                |
| Medicsight  Nominees Limited         |       | England and  Wales                |
| MedicExchange,  Inc                  |       | Delaware, U.S.A.                  |
| Medicsight Asset  Management Limited |       | England and  Wales                |
| Medicsight USA,  Inc                 |       | Nashville,  U.S.A.                |
| Medicsight  International Limited    |       | Gibraltar                         |
| Medicsight KK                        |       | Japan                             |
| Medicsight  Finance Limited          |       | England and  Wales                |
| HTTP Tech, Inc.                      |       | New York, U.S.A.                  |
| Medical Vision  Systems, Inc.        |       | Delaware, U.S.A.                  |

 

E-1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,280
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                       580
<INVENTORY>                                     21,941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,249
<PP&E>                                          29,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,910
<BONDS>                                          4,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,419
<SALES>                                         42,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,031
<CGS>                                           25,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   488
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    651
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (187)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                838
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       838
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Richard Nardone, Respondent, v Peter Iasillo, as Mayor of the Village of Port Chester, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents suspending petitioner’s taxi driver’s license in the Village of Port Chester for a period of one year, the appeals are from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), entered December 13, 1984, and a judgment of the same court dated January 10, 1985 and entered upon said order, which granted the petition to the extent of reducing the period of suspension to 20 days.

Appeal from the order dismissed *(Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248).

Judgment reversed, on the law, order vacated, determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits.

Appellants are awarded one bill of costs.

On the entire record herein, it has been demonstrated that the penalty imposed by the appellants was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







I,
      Paul
      DePond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
      financial condition and results of operations of Notify Technology Corporation.




By: /s/ Paul
              F. DePondName:
Paul
              F. DePondTitle:
              Chief Executive Officer


Date: May
      15,
      2008





I,
      Gerald
      W. Rice, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
      financial condition and results of operations of Notify Technology Corporation.




By: 
              s/ Gerald W. RiceName:
              Gerald W. RiceTitle:
              Chief Financial Officer




Date: May
      15,
      2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Notify Technology Corporation and will be retained by Notify Technology
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
# Official Journal L 168/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 168 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6225 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 168

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6225 June 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1036 of 18 June 2019 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Zagorski mlinci’ (PGI) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1037 of 23 May 2016 on the measures SA.32184-2013/C (ex 2013/NN) and SA.32669-2013/C (ex 2013/NN) implemented by Denmark for combined heat and power plants and an electricity supplier which affect the market for regulating power
  (notified under document C(2016) 3003)

   (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1036 of 18 June 2019 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Zagorski mlinci’ (PGI)

1

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1037 of 23 May 2016 on the measures SA.32184-2013/C (ex 2013/NN) and SA.32669-2013/C (ex 2013/NN) implemented by Denmark for combined heat and power plants and an electricity supplier which affect the market for regulating power
  (notified under document C(2016) 3003)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2016) 3003)

1

3

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/981 of 8 March 2019 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) ( OJ L 161, 18.6.2019 ) | 16 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/981 of 8 March 2019 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) ( OJ L 161, 18.6.2019 )

( OJ L 161, 18.6.2019 )

16

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Pat Rossetti, as Administratrix of the Estate of Carmine Rossetti, Deceased, Respondent, v Alexander M. DeLaGarza, Appellant.

—In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lodato, J.), dated October 31, 1984, which granted the plaintiffs motion to strike his affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction and denied his cross motion for summary judgment.

Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion denied, cross motion granted, and complaint dismissed. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

The plaintiffs process server made numerous attempts to serve the defendant at his places of business and at his home, on various days and at various times. When the process server was unable to locate the defendant during any of these attempts at service, he finally affixed a copy of the summons to the door of the defendant’s home and mailed another copy to the same address, pursuant to CPLR 308 (4). He made service in this manner on two separate occasions.

However, this “nail and mail” service pursuant to CPLR 308 (4) may only be used where service under CPLR 308 (1), (2) cannot be made with due diligence.

In the case at bar, the process server had several opportunities to serve a person of “suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode” of the defendant, and to mail another copy of the summons to the defendant at “his last known residence”, pursuant to CPLR 308 (2). Therefore, since service pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) could have been made with due diligence, the process server’s resort to “nail and mail” service pursuant to *794CPLR 308 (4) was improper and did not confer personal jurisdiction over the defendant *(see, Weinberg v Hillbrae Bldrs.,*58 AD2d 546; *Levin v McGovern,*53 AD2d 1042).

Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion to strike the defendant’s affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction should be denied, and the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment granted. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-10471.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*965Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 22, 2011.

Wade Maxwell Rhyne, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Mark Stuart Goldrosen, Esquire, Law Office of Mark Goldrosen, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Louie Rodriguez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We affirm the conviction, but remand for the limited purpose of conforming the written judgment to the oral pronouncement of sentence.

Rodriguez contends the case should be remanded to conform special condition of supervised release number 2 in the written judgment to the oral pronouncement of sentence. The government agrees. The record demonstrates that the written judgment — which requires Rodriguez to provide the probation officer access to any requested financial information, including tax returns, and authorizes the probation office to conduct checks and obtain copies of income tax returns — is inconsistent with the oral pronouncement of sentence, which does not contain that requirement. The condition regarding financial information is therefore not a cognizable part of Rodriguez’s sentence and must be stricken from the written judgment. *See United States v. Hicks,*997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir.1993) (stating that the unambiguous oral pronouncement of sentence controls).

The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the case REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50893

PATRICIA ANN MEUSBURGER, Plaintiff,

versus CHANNEL 6, INC., doing business as KCEN-TV, Defendant

****************************************************************

WILLIAM G ROSS Plaintiff-Appellant

versus CHANNEL 6 INC, doing business as KCEN-TV Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(W-94-CA-385)

August 8, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 3 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 4 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 5 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 6 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 7 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 8 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 9 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 10 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 11 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 12 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 13 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 14 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 15 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 16 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 17 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 18 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 19 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 20 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 21 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 22 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 23 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 24 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 25 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 26 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 27 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 28 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 29 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 30 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 31 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 32 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 33 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 34 of 35
Case 1:01-cv-00722 Document 142 Filed 05/31/05 Page 35 of 35
#### CALLAHAN v. RODGERS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 18, 1907.)

Action by Timothy Callahan against John G. Rodgers, impleaded.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the
foregoing Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any
other securities law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78) and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway
Financial Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005.



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul C. Hudson                   
|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|                     |  |     |  | Paul C. Hudson                       
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |     |  | Broadway Financial Corporation       
|                     |  |    
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Samuel Sarpong                   
|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|                     |  |     |  | Samuel Sarpong                       
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                     |  |     |  | Broadway Financial Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,260
<PP&E>                                       8,810,568
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,714,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,262,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,262,998
<SALES>                                        479,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               481,938
<CGS>                                          226,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  438,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,308
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,308
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,308
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Case: 1:02-cv-06425 Document #: 38 Filed: 08/19/03 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:358

Case: 1:02-cv-06425 Document #: 38 Filed: 08/19/03 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:359
Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 46 Filed: 10/27/04 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:353

Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 46 Filed: 10/27/04 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:354

Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 46 Filed: 10/27/04 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:355

Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 46 Filed: 10/27/04 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:356
# Official Journal L 230/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 230 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5128 August 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 230

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5128 August 2008

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Council |
| | | 2008/687/EC |
| | * | Decision No 1/2007 of the EU-Egypt Association Council of 6 March 2007 setting up subcommittees of the Association Committee and a Working Group on Migration, Social and Consular Affairs | 1 |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | | Council |
| | | 2008/688/EC |
| | * | Recommendation No 1/2007 of the EU-Egypt Association Council of 6 March 2007 on the implementation of the EU-Egypt Action Plan | 19 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Council

2008/687/EC

*

Decision No 1/2007 of the EU-Egypt Association Council of 6 March 2007 setting up subcommittees of the Association Committee and a Working Group on Migration, Social and Consular Affairs

1

RECOMMENDATIONS

Council

2008/688/EC

*

Recommendation No 1/2007 of the EU-Egypt Association Council of 6 March 2007 on the implementation of the EU-Egypt Action Plan

19

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit
23.1
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  Our
report on our audits of the financial statements of Manhattan Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.  as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years then ended
and for the period from August 6, 2001 (date of inception) to December 31, 2009,
which contains explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of the new
accounting standard for whether an equity linked financial instrument is indexed
to its own stock and the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern,
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, is dated March 31, 2010. We consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report in the following registration statements previously filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities
Act of 1933: the registration statements on Forms S-1 with SEC File Nos.
333-150580 and 333-157470 and the registration statements on Forms S-8 with SEC
file Nos. 333-48531, 333-15807, 333-112888 and 333-112889
 
 /s/J.H.
Cohn LLP
 
 Roseland,
New Jersey
 March 31,
2010