alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Community Living

# AGENCY:

Administration for Community Living, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Representatives of the Administration on Disabilities (AoD), Administration for Community Living (ACL), will be conducting a federal review of the Missouri Protection and Advocacy System (P&A) on September 13-17, 2021. AoD is soliciting comments from interested parties on your experiences with the program, and strategies employed by P&A in meeting the needs of individuals with developmental disabilities and their families in Missouri. You are encouraged to share your experiences by way of email or telephone.

# DATES:

Comments must be submitted electronically or via telephone by September 22, 2021, 11:59 p.m. (EST) in order to be included in the final report.

*Email: Katherine.Cargill-Willis@acl.hhs.gov*.                    

*Telephone:*                         202-795-7322.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Katherine Cargill-Willis, Administration for Community Living, Administration on Disabilities, 330 C Street SW, 1st Floor, Washington, DC 20201, 202-795-7322.

Dated: July 23, 2021.

Alison Barkoff,

Acting Administrator & Assistant Secretary for Aging.

[FR Doc. 2021-16131 Filed 7-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4154-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


	 	Garofalo & Associates, LLC	 
	 	One Devonshire Place	 
	Mergers,	Boston, Massachusetts 02109	 
	Acquisitions,	 	frankjgarofalo@cs.com
	Divestitures	Corporate and Business Development Consultants	Cell: (617) 877-1974


 


	Mr. Roger May	May 6, 2021
	Chief Executive Officer	 
	Graphene and Solar Technologies	 


 


Roger


 


Please accept this letter as my formal resignation as Chairman and Director
of GSTX effective immediately.


 


Sincerely,


 


		 
	Frank J. Garofalo	 
	Managing Partner	 
	Garofalo & Associates, LLC
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Soil Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl P.
Ranno, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno
----------------------------------
Carl P. Ranno
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer
May 17, 2010
Order filed March 17, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00071

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF A .W.G. JR., A CHILD , Appellant

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 06 727J



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Respondent's Father Exhibit 1, a parenting certificate and Exhibit 2, paycheck stubs.

The clerk of the 314th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of Respondent's Father Exhibit 1, a parenting certificate and Exhibit 2, paycheck stubs, on or before 5 days. The Clerk of this court is directedto receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices

of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of Respondent's Father Exhibit 1, a parenting certificate and Exhibit 2, paycheck stubs, to the clerk o f the 314th District Court.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of IBSG International, Inc. for the quarter ended March
31, 2004, I, Michael Rivers, President, Chief Executive Officer , hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

| | 1.       
               Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully
               complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2.       
               The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
               quarter ended March 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IBSG International, Inc.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 25, 2004

/s/ Michael RiversPresident and Chief
Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           15,796
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   668,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                     51,000
<INVENTORY>                                     704,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,373,604
<PP&E>                                          277,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                   91,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                3,496,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         9,378,652
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                   2,237,587
<COMMON>                                          6,912
<OTHER-SE>                                   (8,126,815)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  3,496,693
<SALES>                                       2,565,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,565,488
<CGS>                                         3,547,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 3,547,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              4,475,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              567,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (5,563,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (5,760,987)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  197,260
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (5,563,727)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.84)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            7208
<SECURITIES>                                      5931
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10261
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       3197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 27617
<PP&E>                                            2441
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   30824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8202
<BONDS>                                             15
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         26068
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3461)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     30824
<SALES>                                          38662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 38662
<CGS>                                            10793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    23130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (601)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5298
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1582
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3716
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3716
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Commodity Protection and Quality Research
                                    Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research
                                    Water Management Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic Repository
                    Pacific West AreaSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Updatesheadline bar Recent
               Archive


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas S. Keating, Also Known as Tomas Keating, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 582]

Peters, EJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered April 8, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of attempted disseminating indecent material to minors in the first degree and failure to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Pursuant to an agreement resolving two indictments against him, defendant waived his right to appeal in each case and pleaded guilty to attempted disseminating indecent material to minors in the first degree and failure to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act. County Court thereafter denied defendant’s motion to withdraw the plea and imposed the agreed-upon aggregate prison sentence of 22/s to 7 years. Defendant appeals.

Defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal in both cases. During the combined plea allocution, County Court distinguished the right to appeal from those rights forfeited by pleading guilty. Defendant then stated that he understood the consequences of waiving his right to appeal, discussed the written appeal waivers with counsel to his satisfaction, and executed them in open court. Thus, we reject defendant’s contentions that he did not comprehend the rights he was giving up, or that County Court was obliged to address the written waivers separately during the colloquy *(see People v Budwick,*82 AD3d 1447, 1448 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 857 [2011]; *People v Vaughns,*70 AD3d 1123, 1124 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 758 [2010]).

Defendant’s challenge to County Court’s denial of his oral application to withdraw his guilty plea, which survives his appeal waivers *(see People v Shurock,*83 AD3d 1342, 1343 [2011]), is without merit. During the plea colloquy, defendant was fully apprised of the terms of the plea agreement and the rights he would be giving up, discussed the ramifications of pleading guilty with counsel, expressed his understanding of them and freely elected to proceed. Defendant further declared himself to be satisfied with defense counsel during the colloquy, notwithstanding his prior concerns about counsel’s performance. *1108Indeed, defendant pointed to no specific basis for his motion to withdraw, instead asserting in conclusory fashion that “all of the facts and circumstances” of the case supported it. Inasmuch as nothing in the record suggests that defendant’s guilty plea was anything less than knowing, voluntary and intelligent, County Court properly denied his application without conducting any further inquiry (see CPL 220.60 [3]; *People v Carmona,*66 AD3d 1240, 1241 [2009], *lv denied*14 NY3d 799 [2010]; *People v Smith,*270 AD2d 719, 720 [2000]).

We have examined defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim and, to the extent it implicates the voluntariness of his plea and thus survives his appeal waiver, find it to be without merit.

Lahtinen, Spain, Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10877 Summary Calendar

CHRISTOPHER COWAN, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CV-291-C

- - - - - - - - - - May 27, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Christopher Cowan, Texas prisoner # 403565, appeals the district court’s denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction. To the extent that Cowan is required to obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) in order to appeal the district court’s order, we conclude that Cowan has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Without deciding whether a COA is required, we find no abuse of discretion in the reasoning adopted by theNo. 97-10877 - 2 - district court. Cowan v. Johnson , No. 1:96-CV-291-C (N.D. Tex. Jul. 15, 1997); see Lakedreams v. Taylor , 932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991); Watson v. Graves , 909 F.2d 1949, 1552 (5th Cir. 1990). Further, we find that Cowan’s appeal is frivolous, and accordingly, we DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. COA DENIED.
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 12
Case 10-00363 Doc 43 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:33:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 12
# Official Journal L 228/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 228 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 602 September 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 228

English edition

Legislation

Volume 602 September 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1519 of 1 September 2017 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2017) 6056)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | * | Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/1520 of 26 July 2017 regarding the rule of law in Poland complementary to Recommendations (EU) 2016/1374 and (EU) 2017/146 | 19 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1519 of 1 September 2017 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2017) 6056)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2017) 6056)

1

1

RECOMMENDATIONS

*

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/1520 of 26 July 2017 regarding the rule of law in Poland complementary to Recommendations (EU) 2016/1374 and (EU) 2017/146

19

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John H. Cunningham, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), rendered November 23, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*586Judgment affirmed.

It was not error to place defendant in a prearraignment lineup despite his representation by an attorney in connection with other unrelated charges pending at the time of his arrest *(see, People v Hawkins,*55 NY2d 474, *cert denied*459 US 846; *People v Robertson,*109 AD2d 806). Nor was it error to admit the gun in question into evidence. The robbery victim testified that the gun "looks like” the one held by the perpetrator. The gun was found on the morning after the arrest near the spot where defendant was apprehended. Although the arresting officers did not see defendant drop or throw anything, there was testimony that he was moving his arms and legs about prior to being taken into custody. The gun was therefore sufficiently connected to defendant to be admissible *(see, People v Mirenda,*23 NY2d 439).

Defendant also contends that, because there was a passenger with him when he was seen by a police officer behind the wheel of the stolen car, it was error to charge the jury that they could infer defendant’s guilt from proof of his recent and exclusive possession of the fruits of the crime. There was no objection to the charge and therefore any alleged error is not preserved for appellate review. In any event, interest of justice consideration is inappropriate in this case in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.