alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID TREVIZO,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00069

- CR

Appeal from

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 20140D05903 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Trevizo i s attempting to appeal the trial court’s judgment revoking community

supervision. Finding that Appellant did not timely file h is notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Oli vo v. State

,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). In a criminal case, a defendant’s notice of appeal is

due within thirty days after the sentence is imposed in open court or the trial court enters an

appealable order. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.2(a)(1). T he trial court revoked Appellant’s community

supervision and imposed the original ten

- year sentence assessed when the court placed Appellant

on probation in 2016. The court imposed sentence on January 24, 2019. Consequently, the notice

of appeal was due to be filed no later than February 23 , 2019

. Although Appellant filed his notice

of appeal on March 1, 2019, which is within fifteen days of the filing deadline, he did not file an- 2

-

extension motion. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.3 ( a court of appeals may extend the time to file the notice

of appeal if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party files in the

trial court the notice of appeal, and files in the appellate court a motion complying with Rul e

10.5(b) )

. In the absence of a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have

jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than

to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Slat on v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210

(Tex.Crim.App. 1998). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

April 1 8 , 2019

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Northwest Pipe Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Roman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD A.
ROMAN              
|Richard A. Roman                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer

March 21, 2011
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 108

To require annual, detailed investment reports by plans with qualified cash

or deferred arrangements, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To require annual, detailed investment reports by plans with

qualified cash or deferred arrangements, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small 401(k) Pension

5 Disclosure Act of 1997’’.
2

•S 108 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF ANNUAL, DETAILED INVEST2 MENT REPORTS APPLIED TO CERTAIN 401(k)

3 PLANS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 104(b)(3) of the Em5 ployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29

6 U.S.C. 1024(b)(3)) is amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(3)’’; and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph:

10 ‘‘(B)(i) If a plan includes a qualified cash or

11 deferred arrangement (as defined in section

12 401(k)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986)

13 and is maintained by an employer with less than 100

14 participants, the administrators shall furnish to each

15 participant and to each beneficiary receiving benefits

16 under the plan an annual investment report detail17 ing such information as the Secretary by regulation

18 shall require.

19 ‘‘(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply with respect to

20 any participant described in section 404(c).’’.

21 (b) REGULATIONS.—

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Labor, in

23 prescribing regulations required under section

24 104(b)(3)(B)(i) of the Employee Retirement Income

25 Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1023(b)(3)(B)(i)),

26 as added by subsection (a), shall consider including
3

•S 108 IS

1 in the information required in an annual investment

2 report the following:

3 (A) Total plan assets and liabilities as of

4 the beginning and ending of the plan year.

5 (B) Plan income and expenses and con6 tributions made and benefits paid for the plan

7 year.

8 (C) Any transaction between the plan and

9 the employer, any fiduciary, or any 10-percent

10 owner during the plan year, including the acqui11 sition of any employer security or employer real

12 property.

13 (D) Any noncash contributions made to or

14 purchases of nonpublicly traded securities made

15 by the plan during the plan year without an ap16 praisal by an independent third party.

17 (2) ELECTRONIC TRANSFER.—The Secretary of

18 Labor in prescribing such regulations shall also

19 make provision for the electronic transfer of the re20 quired annual investment report by a plan adminis21 trator to plan participants and beneficiaries.

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

23 subsection (a) shall apply to plan years beginning after

24 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:631

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:632

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:633

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:634

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:635

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:636

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:637

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:638

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:639

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:640

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:641

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 105 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:642
Exhibit
13.1





Credicorp
Ltd.


Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18
U.S.C. Section 1350)





Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:





1.
            I
      am the Chairman Executive Officer of Credicorp Ltd. (the
      “Company”).





2.
            To
      my knowledge:





(A)    
The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008
accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(B)     
The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
June 30, 2009





/s/ DIONISIO ROMERO P.Name:  Dionisio
      RomeroTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clinton Goodman, Also Known as Kenneth White, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), all rendered June 16, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under indictments Nos. 3119/82 and 5417/82 (one count as to each indictment), and attempted robbery in the second degree, under indictment No. 3602/82, upon his pleas of guilty, and sentencing him to two indeterminate terms of 4 *Vi*to 9 years’ imprisonment, and an indeterminate term of *SVz*to 7 years’ imprisonment, respectively, the sentences to run concurrently.

Judgment imposed under indictment No. 3602/82 modified, on the law, by reducing the minimum term imposed thereon to *2 Vs*years. As so modified, judgment under indictment No. 3602/82 affirmed, and judgments imposed under indictments Nos. 3119/82 and 5417/82 affirmed.

The highest permissible sentence for the class D violent felony offense of attempted robbery in the second degree is *2 Vs*to 7 years *(see,*Penal Law § 70.02 [2] [b]; § 70.00 [2] [d]; § 70.02 [4]). We have modified the sentence imposed under indictment No. 3602/82 accordingly *(cf. People v Williams,*88 AD2d 983).

*679We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on the appeals from the judgments rendered under indictments Nos. 3119/82 and 5417/82. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel on the appeals from those judgments is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

Certification Furnished Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Kerry J. ChauvinKerry J. ChauvinChief Executive OfficerOctober 29, 2010By:

/s/ Robin A. SeibertRobin A. SeibertChief Financial OfficerOctober 29, 2010


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. and will be retained by Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2020201EN.01002101.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/21

---

Order of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Plásticos Hidrosolubles (green cycles)

(Case T-78/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - European Union figurative mark green cycles - Genuine use of the mark - Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 10(3) and (4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character - Lack of use of the sign as a company logo)

(2020/C 201/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: A. Marx, K. Bonhagen and M. Wolter, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Scardocchia and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Plásticos Hidrosolubles, SL (Rafelbuñol, Spain) (represented by: C. Sueiras Villalobos, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 November 2018 (Case R 778/2018-5) relating to revocation proceedings between Lidl Stiftung and Plásticos Hidrosolubles.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 November 2018 (Case R 778/2018-5) in so far as it found genuine use of the contested mark in respect of the goods in Class 20. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 November 2018 (Case R 778/2018-5) in so far as it found genuine use of the contested mark in respect of the goods in Class 20.

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

| 3. | Orders Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, EUIPO and Plásticos Hidrosolubles, SL, to each bear their own costs incurred during the proceedings before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, EUIPO and Plásticos Hidrosolubles, SL, to each bear their own costs incurred during the proceedings before the Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.

---
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 222 Filed: 04/15/04 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1894
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 222 Filed: 04/15/04 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:1895
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 222 Filed: 04/15/04 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:1896
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 222 Filed: 04/15/04 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:1897
Case: 1:01-cv-06204 Document #: 222 Filed: 04/15/04 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:1898
#### Walter Kamenar et al., Appellants, v Town of Kent et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from water contamination, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Beisheim, J.), dated August 19,1983, which, upon the motion of the defendants Putnam County and Putnam County Board of Health to dismiss the complaint as against them for nonjoinder of the State of New York as a necessary party, dismissed the complaint as against all defendants “without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to pursue their claim against the defendants in the Court of Claims”.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. *(See, Baisley v Town of Kent,*111 AD2d 299.) Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 183A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 183A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6228 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 183A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6228 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2019/C 183 A/01 | Corrigendum to Vacancy Notice for the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) — Amsterdam (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2019/20037 ( OJ C 165 A, 14.5.2019 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2019/C 183 A/01

Corrigendum to Vacancy Notice for the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) — Amsterdam (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2019/20037 ( OJ C 165 A, 14.5.2019 )

( OJ C 165 A, 14.5.2019 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### SILBER v. SIRE.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County,

General Term.

December 23, 1895.)

Appeal—Review—Conflicting Evidence.'

Where the evidence is conflicting and confused, the decision of the trial court will not be disturbed on appeal.

Appeal from Eighth district court.

Action by Leonard J. Silber against Benjamin Sire. From á judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before BOOKSTAVER and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Albert I. Sire, for appellant.

Julius Silverman, for respondent.

BOOKSTAVER, J.

Action for damages for the conversion of a safe. Plaintiff bought a safe from Sire & Reisfeld, which was standing in a store at the northeast corner of Thirty-Ninth street and Sixth avenue. This firm occupied the store down to April 1, 1895. When they moved out they left the safe there, and plaintiff claims they afterwards sold it to him. A Mr. Stein was in charge of the empty store, and refused to let the safe go, saying that Mr. Sire so directed him. The defendant denied that he owned the store or the building, or that he had authorized any one to withhold a safe there from the plaintiff, and testified that a Mr. Fountain owned the building. He would not say, however, that he had not brought a suit against Sire and his partner for the rent. His memory on this important point is very obscure. Stein testified that a man named Hazlett, agent for Fountain, had brought a suit against Sire & Reisfeld, presumably for the rent of the store. Hazlett’s office was with Sire, and Sire’s employés were accustomed to obey him. The testimony is very conflicting and confused. This confusion could have been cleared by the production of witnesses within reach. There was, however, evidence sufficient to support the finding of the justice, who had all the parties before him, and could best determine where the truth lay.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed, with costs.
Document

Exhibit 10.3


Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC


August 4, 2021


Cheniere Marketing International LLP
3rd Floor, The Zig Zag Building
70 Victoria Street
London SW1E 6SQ, United Kingdom
Attn: Commercial Operations


Re:       Letter Agreement regarding the Base SPA (“Letter Agreement”)


Dear Sir or Madam:


The Parties have entered into that certain Amended and Restated LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement (FOB) dated August 5, 2014 between Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC and Cheniere Marketing International LLP (as assignee of Cheniere Marketing, LLC) (as amended and assigned, the “Base SPA”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Base SPA.  This Letter Agreement sets forth the terms of certain sales and purchases of LNG under the Base SPA.


The Parties hereby agree that, notwithstanding Section 9.2 and subject to Section 14 of the Base SPA, the FPC (expressed in USD per MMBtu) applicable to: (i) up to six (6) cargoes scheduled for delivery in the 2022 Contract Year and up to six (6) cargoes scheduled for delivery in the 2023 Contract Year shall equal USD one decimal seven six eight per MMBtu (US$1.768/MMBtu); and (ii) up to six (6) cargoes scheduled for delivery in the 2022 Contract Year shall equal USD one decimal nine five two per MMBtu (US$1.952/MMBtu).


Please indicate Buyer’s agreement with the terms of this Letter Agreement by executing a copy of this Letter Agreement where indicated below and returning it to Seller. 


Sincerely,


Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC


						
	By:	/s/ Zach Davis
		Zach Davis
		Chief Financial Officer




Accepted and Agreed:
												
	Cheniere Marketing International LLP	
	acting by its managing member, Cheniere Marketing, LLC
				
	By:	/s/ Anatol Feygin	
		Anatol Feygin		
		Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer




700 Milam Street, Suite 1900, Houston, Texas 77002
+1 713-375-5000
EX-10.4





 Exhibit 10.4 

Execution Version 

TERMINATION AGREEMENT 
 This
TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of July 27, 2021, by and between Core & Main LP (f/k/a HD Supply Waterworks, Ltd.), a Florida limited partnership, and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company. 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto are party to a Consulting Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2017
(the “Consulting Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to terminate the Consulting Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 Section 1.
Termination of Consulting Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of the Consulting Agreement to the contrary (including any provisions that purport to survive the termination thereof), effective as of the date hereof, the Consulting
Agreement is hereby terminated without any obligation surviving such termination. Each party hereto hereby waives any notice, consent or other requirement in connection with such termination of the Consulting Agreement. As a matter of precaution,
each party hereto waives, effective as of the date hereof, any claims it may have against the other party under the Consulting Agreement. 

Section 2. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the principles
of conflicts of law thereof. 
 Section 3. Binding on Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 
 Section 4. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts (including via facsimile or scanned pages), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

[Signature page follows] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first above
written. 
  

			
	CLAYTON, DUBILIER & RICE, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Rima Simson

		 	Name: Rima Simson
		 	Title: Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
	
	CORE & MAIN LP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen O. LeClair

		 	Name: Stephen O. LeClair
		 	Title:   Chief Executive Officer


 [Signature Page to Termination Agreement (for CD&R Consulting Agreement)]