43166 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

41540 (July 10, 2020). 

2Commerce collapsed NLMK Clabecq S.A., 

NLMK Plate Sales S.A., NLMK Sales Europe S.A., 

NLMK Manage Steel Center S.A., and NLMK La 

Louviere S.A. as a single entity (collectively, NLMK 

Belgium) in the less-than-fair-value investigation. 

See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length 

Plate from Belgium: Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and Final Determination of 

Critical Circumstances, in Part, 82 FR 16378 (April 

4, 2017). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of 2019–2020 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated February 24, 

2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Belgium,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

6For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

‘‘Implementation Guidance for Title V 

of the E-Government Act, Confidential 

Information Protection and Statistical 

Efficiency Act of 2002 (CIPSEA),’’ 

Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 115, June 

15, 2007, p. 33362. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average between 10 and 

60 minutes per respondent. In all states 

except Hawaii, operations with less than 

$100,000 in sales of floriculture 

products respond to a reduced number 

of questions related to operation 

characteristics while operations with 

sales greater than $100,000 complete the 

entire questionnaire. In Hawaii, all 

operations with sales of at least $10,000 

will complete the full questionnaire. 

The proposed increase in burden 

reflects the additional respondents from 

the program change. 

Respondents: Farms and businesses. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

12,200. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 6,400 hours. 

Comments: Comments are invited on: 

(a) Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the proposed collection 

of information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, through 

the use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, technological, or 

other forms of information technology 

collection techniques. 

All responses to this notice will 

become a matter of public record and be 

summarized in the request for OMB 

approval. 

Signed at Washington, DC, July 29, 2021. 

Kevin L. Barnes, 

Associate Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2021–16783 Filed 8–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–423–812] 

Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate From Belgium: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that the producers/exporters subject to 

this administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR) May 1, 2019, through April 30, 

2020. Additionally, Commerce 

preliminarily determines that two 

companies for which we initiated 

reviews had no shipments during the 

POR. Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable August 6, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex 

Wood, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1959. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 10, 2020, based on timely 

requests for review in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length 

plate from Belgium.1 This review covers 

22 producers and/or exporters of the 

subject merchandise.2 Commerce 

selected two companies, Industeel 

Belgium S.A. (Industeel) and NLMK 

Belgium, for individual examination. 

The producers and/or exporters not 

selected for individual examination are 

listed in the ‘‘Preliminary Results of the 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled 

deadlines for all preliminary and final 

results in administrative reviews by 60 

days, thereby extending the deadline for 

these results until April 1, 2021.3 On 

February 24, 2021, Commerce extended 

the preliminary results of this review by 

120 days, until July 30, 2021.4 For a 

complete description of the events that 

followed the initiation of this review, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.5

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

certain carbon and alloy steel hot-rolled 

or forged flat plate products not in coils, 

whether or not painted, varnished, or 

coated with plastics or other nonmetallic substances from Belgium. 

Products subject to the order are 

currently classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under item numbers: 

7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 

7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 

7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 

7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 

7211.14.0045, 7225.40.1110, 

7225.40.1180, 7225.40.3005, 

7225.40.3050, 7226.20.0000, and 

7226.91.5000. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to this scope is dispositive.6

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) 

and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Export price and 

constructed export price are calculated 

in accordance with section 772 of the 

Act. NV is calculated in accordance 

with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 43167 

7See Dillinger’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Carbon and 

Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length Plate from Belgium—No 

Sales Certification,’’ dated July 21, 2020; and 

Industeel France’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Carbon and 

Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length Plate from Belgium: 

Industeel France No Shipment Letter,’’ dated 

August 4, 2020. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Belgium (A–423– 

812),’’ dated August 20, 2020. 

9See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of 

Review, Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 

24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51306 

(August 28, 2014). 

10See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 

12Commerce is exercising its discretion, under 19 

CFR 351.309(d)(1), to alter the time limit for filing 

of rebuttal briefs. 

13See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

14See 19 CFR 351.303. 

15See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

16See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

17See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

18See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/summary. A 

list of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as an appendix to this notice. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Two companies under review, AG der 

Dillinger Huttenwerke (Dillinger) and 

Industeel France S.A.S. (Industeel 

France), filed statements reporting that 

they made no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR.7 U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) provided no 

information to contradict these claims of 

no shipments during the POR.8

Therefore, we preliminarily determine 

that Dillinger and Industeel France had 

no shipments during the POR. 

Consistent with our practice, we find 

that it is not appropriate to 

preliminarily rescind the review with 

respect to Dillinger or Industeel France, 

and we will instead complete the review 

for these companies and issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on the final results of this review.9

Preliminary Results of the Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the respondents for the 

period May 1, 2019, through April 30, 

2020: 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Industeel Belgium S.A ................ 0.51 

NLMK Clabecq S.A./NLMK Plate 

Sales S.A./NLMK Sales Europe S.A./NLMK Manage Steel 

Center S.A./NLMK La 

Louviere S.A ........................... 6.40 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

C.A. Picard GmbH ...................... 3.46 

Doerrenberg Edelstahl GmbH .... 3.46 

Edgen Murray ............................. 3.46 

EEW Steel Trading LLC ............. 3.46 

Fike Europe B.A ......................... 3.46 

Macsteel International ................ 3.46 

NLMK Dansteel A.S ................... 3.46 

NLMK Verona SpA ..................... 3.46 

NobelClad Europe GmbH & Co. 

KG ........................................... 3.46 

RP Technik GmbH Profilsysteme 3.46 

Salzgitter Mannesmann International GmbH ........................ 3.46 

Stahlo Stahl Service GmbH & 

Co. KG .................................... 3.46 

Stemcor USA .............................. 3.46 

Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe ....... 3.46 

TWF Treuhandgesellschaft 

Werbefilm mbH ....................... 3.46 

Tranter Service Centers ............. 3.46 

Va ́lcovny Trub Chomutov A.S .... 3.46 

Voestalpine Grobblech GmbH .... 3.46 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

weighted-average dumping margin to be 

applied to companies not selected for 

individual examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.5 percent), or determined entirely 

on the basis of facts available. 

Consistent with section 735(c)(5)(A) 

of the Act, we determined the weightedaverage dumping margin for each of the 

non-selected companies by using the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

calculated for Industeel France and 

NLMK Belgium in this administrative 

review. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice.10

Interested parties may submit case briefs 

to Commerce no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice.11

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed no later 

than seven days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs.12 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.13 Case and rebuttal briefs 

should be filed using ACCESS.14

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, filed electronically via 

ACCESS within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.15 Hearing 

requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Oral 

presentations at the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, 

Commerce intends to hold the hearing 

at a date and time to be determined.16

Parties should confirm the date, time, 

and location of the hearing two days 

before the scheduled date. 

An electronically-filed document 

must be received successfully in its 

entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the established 

deadline. Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.17

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any written briefs, not 

later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, unless 

otherwise extended.18

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
43168 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 149 / Friday, August 6, 2021 / Notices 

19See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

20For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

21See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

22See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Austria, Belgium, France, the 

Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for 

France, the Federal Republic of Germany, the 

Republic of Korea and Taiwan, and Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 82 FR 24096, 24098 (May 25, 2017). 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries.19

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales. Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

rate is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

average of the cash deposit rates 

calculated for Industeel and NLMK 

Belgium, excluding any rates that are 

zero, de minimis, or determined entirely 

based on adverse facts available. The 

final results of this review shall be the 

basis for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by companies included in these final 

results of review for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.20

Further, if we continue to find, in the 

final results, that Dillinger and Industeel 

France had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended 

entries that entered under their AD case 

number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) at 

the all-others rate, if there is no rate for 

the intermediate company(ies) involved 

in the transaction. 

Consistent with its recent notice,21

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for the exporters listed 

above will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review, except if 

the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for companies not participating 

in this review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific 

cash deposit rate published for the most 

recently completed segment; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, or the original LTFV 

investigation, but the producer is, then 

the cash deposit rate will be the cash 

deposit rate established for the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the merchandise; and (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 5.40 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.22

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: July 30, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

VI. Discussion of the Methodology 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–16835 Filed 8–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–967] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Rescission of Review in Part; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

aluminum extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China (China). The period 

of review (POR) is May 1, 2019, through 

April 30, 2020. Commerce preliminarily 

determines that, because Kingtom 

Aluminio S.R.L. (Kingtom) exported 

merchandise from the Dominican 

Republic that is Chinese in origin, 

Kingtom is a third-country exporter and 

is not eligible for a separate rate and 

that, because Kingtom did not identify 

a Chinese exporter, we are unable to use 

the information provided by Kingtom to 

apply our non-market economy (NME) 

calculation methodology. Additionally, 

we preliminarily determine that none of 

the companies for which an 

administrative review was requested, 

and the request was not withdrawn, 

have demonstrated their eligibility for a 

separate rate and are, therefore, part of 

the China-wide entity, unless they have 

submitted a valid statement of no 

shipments. Interested parties are invited 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES