alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mark Dave HILL, a/k/a E, a/k/a Clarence Buckner, a/k/a Earl, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 11-6299.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 2, 2011.

Mark Dave Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Dave Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s margin order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. *77We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### PEOPLE ex rel. SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. SMITH, Sheriff, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate' Division, Fourth Department.

October 19, 1907.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Edward B. Schwartz, against James Smith, sheriff of Erie County.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with ■costs.
6411815v1 893190 53471

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DAVID BOURKE,

Plaintiff,

v.

VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE, ET AL. ,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 03 CV 07749

Honorable James B. Zagel

DEFENDANTS, WAYNE BRUCAR¶S AND

SCOTT CONGER¶S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants, Wayne Brucar (3Brucar ́) and Scott Conger (3Conger ́), by their

undersigned attorneys, hereby move this Honorable Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 56, to grant their Motion for Summary Judgment and enter judgment in their favor as

to all relief sought in plaintiff¶s complaint against them, with prejudice and in support thereof

state as follows:

1. Brucar and Conger are entitled Summary Judgment under Rule 56 because

plaintiff¶s claim for malpractice, as a result of professional judgment during jury selection,

cannot be held as a matter of law and policy to be actionable malpractice or be the proximate

cause of plaintiff¶s loss.

2. Brucar and Conger are entitled Summary Judgment under Rule 56 because

plaintiff¶s claim for malpractice, as a result of professional judgment during jury selection, is

speculative as a matter of law.

Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 54 Filed 02/10/09 Page 1 of 2
2

6411815v1 893190 53471

3. Brucar and Conger are entitled Summary Judgment under Rule 56 for plaintiff¶s

other claims for malpractice (other than the alleged negligent jury selection) because plaintiff has

abandoned said claims by failing to provide expert opinion as to the standard of care.

4. Brucar and Conger incorporate their Memorandum in Support of Their Motion for

Summary Judgment as fully set forth herein.

 WHEREFORE, Wayne E. Brucar and Nathan Scott Conger respectfully request

that this Court grant their Motion for Summary Judgment and enter judgment in their favor and

against plaintiff, David Bourke, on all claims and causes of action.

Respectfully submitted,

WAYNE E. BRUCAR AND N. SCOTT CONGER

By: s/Thomas P. McGarry

Thomas P. McGarry

Thomas P. McGarry

Renée Kelly

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

222 N. LaSalle, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60601

312-704-3000

Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 54 Filed 02/10/09 Page 2 of 2
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487


Exhibit 4.1


 


 



THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


August 3, 2021


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 529 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The
Bank of New York Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”)
included in the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the
date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on August 2, 2021, in accordance
with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We consent to the
reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement
(No. 333-256426) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trusts
and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Carl Hayden Bee Research Center: Tucson, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Information
                        Africanized Honey Bees
                                    Bee Safety
                                    Online Books
                                    Other NewsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Docsheadline bar Aboutus
               Official Disclaimer
               Business
               Main
               Awards
               CHBRC Open House 2016
               Our Location
               Current and Future Research
               Information
               Online Books
               CHBRC Open House News
               Bee Safety
               Africanized Honey Bees
               DeGrandi-Hoffman Lab
               Other News


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.1.1

Eastern Division

Heidi Happel, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:02−cv−07771

Honorable Amy J. St. Eve

Wal−Mart Stores, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, October 1, 2010:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown: Status hearing held. Off

the record settlement conference held. Settlement conference set for 12/07/10 at 10:30

a.m. Plaintiffs shall serve the settlement letter on defendant pursuant to paragraph one of

this Court's standing order for settlement conference by 11/10/10. The defendant shall

serve the responsive letter to the plaintiffs' settlement letter by 12/01/10. Plaintiffs'

counsel shall fax or deliver copies of the letters to this Court's courtroom deputy by

12/02/10. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:02-cv-07771 Document #: 374 Filed: 10/01/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:5710
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Orders & ServicesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Grape Hybrid Inventoryheadline bar Main


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Swift Fertilizer Works, for use, etc., *v.*Kennedy.

April 17, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Worrill. Terrell superior court. May 26, 1914.

*W. E. Gurr,*for plaintiff. *M. C.*Edwards, for defendant.

Lumpkin, J.

There was no error in granting a nonsuit in this ease.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Research: Charleston, SC
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Cucurbit Genetics CooperativeSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Charleston, South Carolina Vegetable Research People & Locations







Lance L Lawrence
                        Vegetable Research

                        




                        
                        Biological Science Technician
                        Phone: (843) 402-5300
                         ext. 2250
                        
                        Fax: (843) 573-4715(Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Wireless Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David D. Singer, the President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
following due inquiry, that I believe that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated:  October 11, 2002





WORLD WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.By:

/s/    DAVID D.
SINGERDavid D. Singer President
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 21, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50518 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILLIAM YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-91-CR-37-1

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * William Young, federal prisoner number 56038-080, appeals the denial of his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He argues that Buford v. United States , 532 U.S. 59 (2001), clarified an amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2, comment. (n.3). He argues that under the clarification he would not have been eligible for the sentencing enhancement he received under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), and its corresponding guideline provision at U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4(b)(3).No. 03-50518 -2- The amendment that Young argues was clarified by Buford is Amendment 382, effective November 1, 1991, which changed the language in U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2, comment. (n.3). Amendment 382 is not listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c), and therefore may not be applied retroactively on Young’s motion. See United States v. Drath , 89 F.3d 216, 218 (5th Cir. 1996). The denial of Young’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion was not an abuse of the district court’s discretion. Its order is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

** **

In connection with theAnnual Report of Blount International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Calvin E. Jenness,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the report.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BlountInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

Date: March 10, 2009

 

 
| /s/ Calvin E. Jenness                              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Calvin E. Jenness                                  |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                              [Letterhead of KPMG]

The Board of Directors
LaSalle Re Holdings Limited

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
64543) on Form S-3 and registration statements (No. 333-38653) and (No. 333-
38655) on Forms S-8 of LaSalle Re Holdings Limited of our report dated October
26, 1998, except as to Note 2(p), which is as of July 13, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of LaSalle Re Holdings Limited and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 1998, and all related
schedules, which report appears in the amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended September 30, 1999 of LaSalle Re Holdings Limited, and to the
reference to our firm under the heading "Experts".

/s/ KPMG

Hamilton, Bermuda
Chartered Accountants
August 22, 2000
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Semrau, Appellant.

[948 NYS2d 841]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE 
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AS SET FORTH IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          34,856
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,423
<INVENTORY>                                     94,054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               284,446
<PP&E>                                         313,588
<DEPRECIATION>                                 183,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 545,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,508
<BONDS>                                         84,751
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                     299,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   545,547
<SALES>                                        512,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               512,696
<CGS>                                          345,732
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  345,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,592
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>