alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 149 (Friday, August 6, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0610]


Safety Zone; Recurring Events in Captain of the Port Duluth--
Bridgefest Regatta Fireworks

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone for the Bridgefest 
Regatta Fireworks in Houghton, MI from 9:15 p.m. through 9:45 p.m. on 
September 4, 2021. This action is necessary to protect participants and 
spectators during the Bridgefest Regatta Fireworks. During the 
enforcement period, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the 
safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Duluth or their designated on-scene representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.943(b) will be enforced from 9:15 
p.m. through 9:45 p.m. on September 04, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notice of enforcement, call or email LTJG Joseph R. McGinnis, telephone 
218-725-3818, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1652637a63627e41415b5663657571387b7f7a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cb8fbea7bebfa39c9c868bbeb8a8ace5a6a2a7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone 
in 33 CFR 165.943(a)(1) for the Bridgefest Regatta Fireworks on all 
waters of the Keweenaw Waterway bounded by the arc of a circle with a 
100-yard radius from the fireworks launch site with its center in 
approximate position 47[deg]07'28'' N, 088[deg]35'02'' W from 09:15 
p.m. through 09:45 p.m.on September 04, 2021. This action is necessary 
to protect participants and spectators during the Bridgefest Regatta 
Fireworks.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Duluth or their 
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port's 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
    This document is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.943 and 5 
U.S.C. 552 (a). In addition to this publication in the Federal 
Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with 
advance notification of the enforcement of this safety zone via 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The Captain of the Port Duluth or their 
on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

    Dated: July 29, 2021
F.M. Smith,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2021-16617 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal C 264/8 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 264 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 658 July 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 264

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 658 July 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 264/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 264/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 8 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 264/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 264/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, )

)

Plaintiff, ) No. 03 C 3904

v. )

) Judge Robert W. Gettleman

KEVIN TRUDEAU, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter came before the court for a report on status and for ruling on plaintiff Federal

Trade Commission’s Motion to Compel Marc Lane to Disclose Information Regarding

Trudeau’s Asset Protection Plan (Doc. 626), pursuant to this court’s order dated April 26, 2013

(Doc. 649). For the reasons stated in open court, it is hereby ordered:

1. The Rule 30(b)(6) depositions of GIN, KTRN and WSU, by Kevin Trudeau, shall

be taken on May 18 and 19, 2013, at a location of plaintiff FTC’s choosing.

2. The depositions of Mr. Lane, Mr. Sant and Mr. Dow have been set and the court

expects them to proceed as scheduled.

3. Plaintiff FTC’s Motion to Compel Marc Lane to Disclose Information (Doc. 626)

is granted. The court has reviewed the briefs filed by the parties and the sample

documents submitted in camera, and finds that plaintiff FTC has established

prima facie evidence sustaining the crime/fraud exception to the attorney/client

and work product privilege. See United States v. Al-Shahin, 474 F.3d 941, 946

(7th Cir. 2007). Pursuant to the directions and the limitations stated by the court

on the record, Marc Lane is directed to produce the documents in question to

counsel for plaintiff FTC, attorney’s eyes only until further order of court, by the

close of business tomorrow or such later date as may be agreed by the parties. 
Mr. Lane’s deposition, currently scheduled for May 6 or 7, 2013, will remain

under seal until further order. 

4. This matter is set for a brief report on status of the discovery discussed at today’s

hearing on May 13, 2013 at 3:30 p.m.

ENTER: May 2, 2013

__________________________________________

Robert W. Gettleman

United States District Judge

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Request for Proposals 75N98021R00006: Development, Statistical Design, Monitoring and Coordination of Vision Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research.                    

*Date:*                         August 30, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Eye Institute,  National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brian Hoshaw, Ph.D., Designated Federal Official, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2020,                         *hoshawb@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 3, 2021. 

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-16863 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
1

Filed 4/13/16 P. v. Kalogirou CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CHRISTOPHER GEORGE

KALOGIROU,

Defendant and Appellant. E064531

(Super.Ct.No. SWF1501347)

OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Judith C. Clark, Judge.

Affirmed.

William Paul Melcher, under the appointment by the Court of Appeal, for

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant Christopher George Kalogirou appeals from his

conviction and five

- year sentence after he plead ed guilty to conspiring to sell or give a

controlled substance to a prison inmate. We affirm the judgment.2 F ACTS AND P ROCEDURE

On September 3, 20 1 5, the People filed a first amended complaint alleging that on

or about February 20, 2015, defendant conspire d with an unknown person to commit the

crime of selling or giving a controlled substance to a prison inmate. (Pen. Code,

§ 4573.9

. ) The overt acts alleged are that the conspirators: ( 1) contacted each other by

phone; ( 2) d iscussed “skaduche” being in a letter addressed from “ Sharon Wood ” ; and

( 3) a letter addressed from “Sharon Wood” was sent to the Southwest Detention Center

containing methamphetamine. The People also alleged defendant had three prior prison

term convictions within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b).

Also on September 3, 2015, defendant pled guilty to the conspiracy charge and

admitted the three prison term priors. The court immediately sentenced him to the

middle term of four years, plus one year for one of the prison term priors, with four years

in custody and one year of mandatory supervision.

This appeal followed.

D ISCUSSION

Upon defendant’s request, this court appointed counsel to represent him on appeal.

Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436

and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 , setting forth a statement of the case, a

summary of the facts and potential arguable issues, and requesting this court to conduct

an independent review of the record.

We of fered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, and he

has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we3

have independently reviewed the entire record for potential error and find no arguable

error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

D ISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

RAMIREZ

P. J.

We concur:

HOLLENHORST

J.

McKINSTER

J.
# C_2020191EN.01001601.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/16

---

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — ZU v EEAS

(Case T-499/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Sick leave - Negative opinion by the medical service - Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system - Acts not amenable to review - Acts not adversely affecting an official - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Premature challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 191/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: R. Spac and S. Marquardt, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the alleged decisions of the EEAS of 31 August 2018 and 10 January 2019, of the European Commission note of 30 August 2018 providing for a reduction of the applicant’s sick leave and, so far as necessary, of the Commission’s decision of 1 April 2019 rejecting his complaint of 30 November 2018 against that note and against any subsequent decision to deduct his absence from 28 to 31 August 2018 from his annual leave.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | ZU shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

ZU shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.

---
#### Robert M. Warner, II, Respondent, v April B. Warner, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 858]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (Norman W Seiter, Jr., J.), entered February 25, 2011. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, referred to Family Court all future issues relative to income tax deductions and exemptions concerning the children.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and that part referring to Family Court all future issues relative to income tax deductions and exemptions concerning the parties’ children is vacated.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from that part of the judgment of divorce providing that all future “issues relative to *1525income tax deductions and exemptions [concerning] the children” shall be referred to Family Court. We note at the outset that, although the judgment was entered upon consent, the provision at issue was added by Supreme Court sua sponte, and defendant’s attorney objected to that provision. Thus, defendant’s contention is properly before us *(cf. Hatsis v Hatsis,*122 AD2d 111, 111 [1986]). We agree with defendant that the court erred in adding the provision with respect to the tax deductions and exemptions inasmuch as the jurisdiction of Family Court is generally limited “to matters pertaining to child support and custody” *(Matter of Paratore v Paratore,*90 AD2d 975 [1982]; *see Matter of Howard v Janowski,*226 AD2d 1087, 1087 [1996]), and tax deductions or exemptions are not an element of support *(see Matter of John M.S. v Bonni L.R.,*49 AD3d 1235, 1235 [2008]; *see generally Paratore,*90 AD2d at 975). Although Family Court Act § 115 (b) provides that Family Court has jurisdiction “over applications for support, maintenance, *a distribution of marital property*and custody in matrimonial actions when referred to the family court by the supreme court” (emphasis added), marital property is defined as that property which is acquired during the marriage *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [c]), and the parties’ entitlement to tax deductions and exemptions concerning the children will affect only property acquired after the marriage. Present — Smith, J.P., Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 89

Requesting the President to submit a budget for fiscal year 1998 that would

balance the Federal budget by fiscal year 2002 without relying on budgetary contingencies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1997

Mr. SUNUNU (for himself, Ms. GRANGER, and Mr. PITTS) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

RESOLUTION

Requesting the President to submit a budget for fiscal year

1998 that would balance the Federal budget by fiscal

year 2002 without relying on budgetary contingencies.

Whereas the President has observed on numerous occasions

that a constitutional amendment is not necessary to balance the budget, observing in his State of the Union address that ‘‘* * * we don’t need a constitutional amendment, we need action.’’;

Whereas the President has also repeatedly agreed, most recently on January 28, 1997, to balance the budget by fiscal year 2002 based on the estimates of the nonpartisan

Congressional Budget Office; and
2

•HRES 89 IH

Whereas the Congressional Budget Office has officially estimated that the President’s budget would increase the deficit by $24 billion in fiscal year 1998 and result in a deficit of at least $69 billion in fiscal year 2002: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That (a) the House of Representatives re2 quests the President to submit to the House, not later

3 than April 7, 1997, a detailed plan to achieve a balanced

4 budget by fiscal year 2002 for the United States, as esti5 mated by the Congressional Budget Office, that—

6 (1) uses the most recent economic and technical

7 assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office;

8 (2) reduces the deficit through programmatic

9 reforms rather than alternative budgetary proce10 dures such as automatic spending cuts and the

11 sunsetting of tax cuts;

12 (3) realizes a significant proportion of its total

13 savings in the first three years; and

14 (4) offers sufficient Medicare reforms to fore15 stall the imminent bankruptcy of the Medicare trust

16 funds for a substantial period.

17 (b) The House of Representatives shall consider a

18 budget plan to achieve a balanced budget by fiscal year

19 2002 for the United States that is in compliance with

20 paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (a).

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1099 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1099

  To authorize the Secretary of the Army to acquire such land in the 
   vicinity of Pierre, South Dakota, as the Secretary determines is 
   adversely affected by the full wintertime Oahe Powerplant release.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1997

  Mr. Daschle (for himself and Mr. Johnson) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Army to acquire such land in the 
   vicinity of Pierre, South Dakota, as the Secretary determines is 
   adversely affected by the full wintertime Oahe Powerplant release.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACQUISITION OF LAND NEAR PIERRE, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    To provide full operational capability to carry out the authorized 
purposes of the Missouri River Main Stem dams that are part of the 
Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program authorized by section 9 of the 
Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public 
works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved December 22, 1944, the Secretary of the Army, 
acting through the Chief of Engineers, may acquire, from willing 
sellers, such land in the vicinity of Pierre, South Dakota, as the 
Secretary determines is adversely affected by the full wintertime Oahe 
Powerplant release.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1188
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:1189
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:1190
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:1191
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:1192
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:1193
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:1194
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:1195
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:1196
Case: 1:03-cv-07069 Document #: 99 Filed: 06/28/05 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:1197
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Written Statement
Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 The undersigned, Steven G. Murdock, the Chief Executive Officer of Meade Instruments Corp.
(the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that: (i) the Form 10Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2004 of the Company (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: January 7, 2005 By: /s/ Steven G. Murdock This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.