alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013055EN.01002601.xml

| 23.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/26

---

Action brought on 3 December 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-147/12)

2013/C 55/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision relating to the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights acquired before he entered the service, under the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials and, so far as necessary, the decision confirming that transfer

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Declare illegal Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare illegal Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | Annul the decision of 3 February 2012 to apply the parameters referred to in the General Implementing Provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011 in respect of the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 3 February 2012 to apply the parameters referred to in the General Implementing Provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011 in respect of the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights;

| — | So far as necessary, annul the decision of 11 October 2012 confirming that transfer; |
| --- | --- |

—

So far as necessary, annul the decision of 11 October 2012 confirming that transfer;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE:

REGINALD P GRIGSBY

DEBTOR

CASE NO. 10 B 00571

CHAPTER 13

JUDGE JACK B SCHMETTERER

NOTICE OF FINAL CURE PAYMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1(f), the Chapter 13 Trustee, TOM VAUGHN 

files this Notice of Final Cure Payment. The amount required to cure the default in the claim listed 

below has been paid in full.

Name of Creditor: NORTHERN TRUST

Final Cure Amount

Court

Claim #

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Amount

Paid

$8,984.74 $9,234.74 $9,234.74

Total Amount Paid by Trustee $9,234.74

Account

Number

8781 ARRS

Claim 

ID

5 9

Monthly Ongoing Mortgage Payment

Mortgage is Paid:

 Through the Chapter 13 Conduit X Direct by the Debtor

Within 21 days of the service of the Notice of Final Cure Payment, the creditor MUST file and serve a 

Statement as a supplement to the holder’s proof of claim on the Debtor, Debtor's Counsel and the 

Chapter 13 Trustee, pursuant to Fed.R.Bank.P.3002.1(g), indicating 1) whether it agrees that the Debtor 

has paid in full the amount required to cure the default on the claim; and 2) whether the Debtor is 

otherwise current on all payments consistent with 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(5). 

The statement shall itemize the required cure or post-petition amounts, if any, that the holder contends 

remain unpaid as of the date of the statement. The statement shall be filed as a supplement to the 

holder’s proof of claim and is not subject to Rule 3001(f). Failure to notify may result in sanctions.

Case 10-00571 Doc 45 Filed 01/23/15 Entered 01/23/15 11:03:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 10-00571-JBS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify under penalty of perjury that this office caused a copy of this notice to be delivered to the 

persons named above by U.S. mail at 55 E. MONROE STREET, SUITE 3850, CHICAGO, IL 60603 or 

by the methods indicated on this 23rd day of January, 2015.

Debtor:

REGINALD P GRIGSBY

1436 W FARWELL AVE # 3C

CHICAGO, IL 60626

Attorney:

DAVID M SIEGEL

790 CHADDICK DR

WHEELING, IL 60090

via Clerk's ECF noticing procedures

Creditor:

NORTHERN TRUST

50 S LASALLE

CHICAGO, IL 60675

Mortgage Creditor:

NORTHERN TRUST CO

% KROPIK PAPUGA & SHAW

120 S LASALLE ST #1500

CHICAGO, IL 60603

ELECTRONIC SERVICE - United States Trustee

Date: January 23, 2015

TOM VAUGHN

CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

55 E. MONROE STREET, SUITE 3850

CHICAGO, IL 60603

/s/ TOM VAUGHN

Case 10-00571 Doc 45 Filed 01/23/15 Entered 01/23/15 11:03:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
# C_2019255EN.01005001.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/50

---

Action brought on 6 June 2019 — Martínez Albainox v EUIPO — Taser International (TASER)

(Case T-342/19)

(2019/C 255/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Martínez Albainox, SL (Albacete, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Taser International, Inc. (Scottsdale, Arizona, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark TASER in colours black, yellow and red — European Union trade mark No 11 710 134

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 March 2019 in Case R 1576/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision expressly declaring the validity of the European Union trademark No. 11 710 134‘TASER’ (fig.) for all registered goods in class 18 and 25; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision expressly declaring the validity of the European Union trademark No. 11 710 134‘TASER’ (fig.) for all registered goods in class 18 and 25;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervening party, Taser International, Inc., to pay all the costs of the dispute before the General Court, including those relating to the procedure before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervening party, Taser International, Inc., to pay all the costs of the dispute before the General Court, including those relating to the procedure before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
----

Action brought on 26 July 2005 by Maurizio Caldarone against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-293/05)

(2005/C 229/79)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 26 July 2005 by Maurizio Caldarone, resident in Brussels, represented by Stéphane Rodrigues and Alice Jaume, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a Commission official, challenges with the present action his partial career development report for the period from 1 January 2003 to 21 August 2003, by alleging, inter alia, inconsistency between the assessments of the appraiser and the co-appraiser, and manifest errors of assessment. He further contends that there has been an infringement of the duty to give reasons, of the rights of the defence, and of the principles of good administration and legitimate expectations.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1104 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1104

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections in maps 
           relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make such corrections 
to the set of maps described in subsection (b) as are necessary to 
restore on that map the September 30, 1982, boundary for Unit M09 on 
the portion of Edisto Island located immediately to the south and west 
of the Jeremy Cay Causeway.
    (b) Map Described.--The map described is the map included in a set 
of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources System,'' dated October 
24, 1990, that relates to the Unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Systems entitled ``Edisto Complex M09/M09P''.

            Passed the Senate June 18, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1104

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections in maps 
           relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.
```
##### 



Exhibit 8.1 List of Subsidiaries of De Rigo S.p.A. Name
    
    Country of IncorporationDe Rigo Vision S.p.A.
    
    ItalyVogart Line España S.a.
    
    SpainDe Rigo (UK) Ltd.
    
    United KingdomDe Rigo Hellas A.E.E.
    
    GreeceDe Rigo France S.a.
    
    FranceDe Rigo Asia Ltd.
    
    Hong KongDe Rigo Hong Kong Ltd.
    
    Hong KongDe Rigo Japan Co., Ltd.
    
    JapanDe Rigo U.S.A., INC.
    
    United StatesEuropean Vision Ltd.
    
    United KingdomVantios Group Ltd.
    
    United KingdomDollond & Aitchison Ltd.
    
    United KingdomD&A Contact Lenses Ltd.
    
    JerseyD&A Eyewear Ltd.
    
    United KingdomD&A Professional Services Ltd.
    
    United KingdomVantios Ltd.
    
    United KingdomBindi Investment Ltd.
    
    JerseyGeneral Optica Internacional S.a.
    
    SpainGeneral Optica Ltd.
    
    United KingdomGeneral Optica S.a.
    
    SpainDR2 S.r.l.
    
    ItalyBase 1 S.r.l.
    
    Italy
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 02-2451

KELLY SAINT FORT,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on May 9, 2003, is amended

as follows:

On page 24, line 16, delete the word "non".
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, Sami S. Abbasi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Sami S. Abbasi
----------------------------------------------
Sami S. Abbasi
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 15, 2003






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
734 A.2d 1280

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. William TARR, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 9, 1999.

Decided Sept. 8, 1999.

Robert Grossi, Franklin, for Com.

Nanette Crews, Grove City, for William Tarr.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Venango County Court of Common Pleas dated November 23, 1998. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
Case: 1:03-cv-01088 Document #: 13 Filed: 01/27/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:36
Case 10-00902 Doc 4 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:47:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 10-00902 Doc 4 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:47:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 494/2005

of 30 March 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 31 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 30 March 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
#### Barbara Knaus et al., Respondents, v John Peschel et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated December 29, 1983, which denied their motion to strike plaintiffs’ note of issue and statement of readiness upon the ground that they had waived their right to depose plaintiffs.

Order modified by adding a provision thereto granting defendants’ motion to the extent of permitting examinations before trial of the plaintiffs. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The examinations before trial shall proceed at Special Term, Part II, in the Queens County General Courthouse at a time to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by appellants, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. The notice shall be served within five days after service upon appellants of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, and the examinations shall be completed within 30 days after service of notice thereof by appellants.

Defense counsel’s conduct, under the circumstances herein, did not constitute a waiver of defendants’ right to depose plaintiffs. Even though this court finds that further disclosure by way of examinations before trial is warranted, there is no need to strike the case from the Trial Calendar *(Mangiaracina v Abatemarco,*87 AD2d 585; *Cohen v Heine & Co.,*39 AD2d 563). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Paul E. Ross,certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meade InstrumentsCorp.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting
| Date: July 16, 2007 |
|--------------------------|
| By:                      | /s/ PAUL E. ROSS |   |
|                     | Paul E. Ross |
|                     | *Senior  Vice President—Finance and CFO* |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 5, 2017

d0329 

# Order

Clerk April 5, 2017

154476

AUDREY TROWELL,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154476

COA: 327525

Oakland CC: 2014

- 141798

- NO

PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL AND

MEDICAL CENTERS, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order

addressing whether the claims in the plaintiff’s complaint sou nd in ordinary negligence or

medical malpractice, Bryant v Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, Inc , 471 Mich 411

(2004). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50893

 

PATRICIA ANN MEUSBURGER,

Plaintiff,

versus

CHANNEL 6, INC., doing business as

KCEN-TV,

Defendant

****************************************************************

WILLIAM G ROSS

Plaintiff-Appellant

versus

CHANNEL 6 INC, doing business as 

KCEN-TV

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas 

(W-94-CA-385)

 

August 8, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 425 

Designating April 23, 2012, as ‘‘National Adopt a Library Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2012 

Mr. WEBB (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. WARNER, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, and 

Mr. COCHRAN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 23, 2012, as ‘‘National Adopt a Library 

Day’’. 

Whereas libraries are an essential part of the communities 

and the national system of education in the United 

States; 

Whereas the people of the United States benefit significantly 

from libraries that serve as an open place for people of 

all ages and backgrounds to use books and other resources that offer pathways to learning, self-discovery, 

and the pursuit of knowledge; 

Whereas libraries in the United States depend on the generous donations and support of individuals and groups to 

ensure that people who are unable to purchase books still 

have access to a wide variety of resources; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 425 ATS 

Whereas certain nonprofit organizations facilitate the donation of books to schools and libraries across the United 

States to extend the joy of reading to millions of people 

of the United States and to prevent used books from 

being thrown away; 

Whereas libraries in the United States have provided valuable 

resources to individuals who are affected by the economic 

crisis by encouraging continued education and job training; 

Whereas libraries are increasingly being used as a resource 

for those seeking the tools and information to enter or 

reenter the workforce; and 

Whereas several States that recognize the importance of libraries and reading have adopted resolutions commemorating April 23 as ‘‘Adopt a Library Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 23, 2012, as ‘‘National 

3 Adopt a Library Day’’; 

4 (2) honors the organizations that facilitate do5 nations to schools and libraries; 

6 (3) urges all people of the United States who 

7 own unused books to donate the books to local li8 braries; 

9 (4) strongly supports children and families who 

10 take advantage of the resources provided by schools 

11 and libraries; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 425 ATS 

1 (5) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe ‘‘National Adopt A Library Day’’ with 

3 appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS