alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Thomas H. Beals, Appellant, v New York City Transit, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 86]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered March 9, 2011, granting *544respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition to vacate the arbitration award confirming petitioner’s termination, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The arbitrator properly declined to apply the collective bargaining agreement’s statute of limitations on the ground that, pursuant to its terms, it had not commenced running while an investigation of the conduct leading to the disciplinary charges against petitioner was under way. In any event, any error by the arbitrator in interpreting the facts or applying the law on this issue did not provide a basis for vacatur of the award *(see Matter of Adolphe v New York City Bd. of Educ.,*89 AD3d 532, 533 [2011]). Petitioner waived his claim that the arbitrator should have enforced his witness subpoenas by failing to seek a stay of the arbitration and a court ruling compelling compliance and by continuing with the arbitration. Moreover, an arbitrator’s erroneous evidentiary rulings may support vacatur only if the evidence would have been pertinent and material *(see Matter of Professional Staff Congress/City Univ. of N.Y. v Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y.,*39 NY2d 319, 323 [1976]). The unproduced testimony of the investigators would have been merely hearsay and cumulative of the testimony based on personal knowledge that had been heard from witnesses and targets of petitioner’s misconduct, the testimony of the Transit Authority managers that the use of profanity was common in the workplace would not have shed light on other charges or rebutted the charge that petitioner’s use of profanity was pervasive, and the woman working in a rehabilitation facility was not a Transit Authority employee subject to subpoena. To the extent that any of the unproduced testimony may have been useful for impeachment, the foreclosure of collateral evidence going to credibility is not misconduct *(see Kaminsky v Segura,*26 AD3d 188, 189 [2006]; *Matter of Smith v Suffolk County Police Dept.,*202 AD2d 678, 679 [1994], *lv denied*84 NY2d 807 [1994]). Petitioner fails to point to any provision in the collective bargaining agreement to support his contention that the arbitrator exceeded a restriction on his power *(see Matter of Chaindom Enters., Inc. [Furgang & Adwar, L.L.P.],*10 AD3d 495, 497 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 709 [2005]). The contention that the failure to consider his alcoholism defense renders the award in violation of public policy is merely a semantic variation on the ineffective claim that the arbitrator failed to properly evaluate the evidence *(see Kalyanaram v New York Inst. of Tech.,*79 AD3d 418, 419-420 [2010], *lv denied*17 NY3d 712 [2011]).

We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, *545Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 3028KU).]
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1144

Disapproving the cancellation transmitted by the President on August 11,

1997, regarding Public Law 105–33.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 3, 1997

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself and Mr. D’AMATO) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance for seven

days of session pursuant to section 1023 of Public Law 93–344

A BILL

Disapproving the cancellation transmitted by the President

on August 11, 1997, regarding Public Law 105–33.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress disapproves of cancellation 97–3 as trans4 mitted by the President in a special message on August

5 11, 1997, regarding Public Law 105–33.

Æ
#### BlueRock Energy Holdings, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Angelo F. Chambrone, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[945 NYS2d 587]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered September 19, 2011. The order approved defendant’s application for attorney’s fees.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR 9 MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRITY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         438,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  378,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                    76,500
<INVENTORY>                                    160,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,159,226
<PP&E>                                       1,607,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                 873,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,697,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,710
<BONDS>                                        825,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,723
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,678,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,697,936
<SALES>                                      1,359,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,450,904
<CGS>                                          972,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  700,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (230,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (89,700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (141,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (141,001)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 18, 2011

p0315 

# Order

March 18, 2011

141672

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141672 COA: 292602 Wayne CC: 08-003062-FH ROBERT WILLIAM DUNCAN, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On March 10, 2011, the Court heard oral argument on the applic ation for leave to appeal the July 6, 2010 judgme nt of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered , and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 15.01


May 12, 2003

Hartford Life, Inc.
690 Asylum Avenue
Hartford Plaza
Hartford, Connecticut 06115

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Hartford Life, Inc. and subsidiaries for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, as indicated in our report dated May 9, 2003;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-months ended March 31, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-28805 and 333-28807
on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-21865 and 333-56283 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
Exhibit 99.1

NEWS RELEASE

For further information contact:



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Kerry J. Chauvin        |  | Joseph Duke Gallagher
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer
|985.872.2100            |  | 985.872.2100           

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

APRIL 17, 2006

GULF ISLAND FABRICATION, INC.

TO ANNOUNCE EARNINGS RESULTS

AND QUARTERLY CONFERENCE CALL

Houma, LA  (BUSINESS WIRE)  April 17, 2006Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. (NASDAQ: GIFI), will announce 2006 first quarter earnings on Wednesday, April
26, 2006 at 8:00 a.m. Central Time (9:00 a.m. Eastern Time).

The management of Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. will hold a conference call on Wednesday,
April 26, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time (10:00 a.m. Eastern Time) to discuss the Companys financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.

The call is accessible by webcast through CCBN and by dialing the following:



|         |  |                   
|-------- |  | ------------------
|Dial In: |  | 1.800.310.7032    
|         | 
|Webcast: |  | www.gulfisland.com

A digital rebroadcast of the call is available two hours after the call and ending May 5, 2006 by dialing:



|                 |  |               
|---------------- |  | --------------
|Phone Number:    |  | 1.888.203.1112
|                 | 
|Replay Passcode: |  | 6455288       

Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc., based in Houma, Louisiana, is a leading fabricator of offshore drilling and
production platforms, offshore living quarters and other specialized structures used in the development and production of offshore oil and gas reserves. The Company also offers offshore interconnect pipe hook-up, inshore marine construction,
manufacture and repair of pressure vessels, and steel warehousing and sales.
#### NERJES v. ROE.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County,

General Term.

December 27, 1895.)

Assignment—Existence oe Subject.

Where rent has been paid three months in advance under a lease containing a provision that the tenant’s damages for delay in getting possession are to be measured by the number of days and deducted from the accruing rent, the lessee cannot assign his claim as a right of action until the end of the three months, for there would be no existing claim until that time.

Appeal from Eighth district court.

Action by George A. Nerjes against Addie Y. Boe. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Beversed.

Argued before BOOKSTAVEE and BISCHOFF, JJ.

David Levy, for appellant.

P. O. Taiman, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

It is obvious, from an examination of the lease under which the plaintiff claims, that the tenant’s damages *470were to be measured by the number of days during which his occupancy was deferred, and the amount deducted, at an agreed rate, from the accruing rent. Here there was no occupancy whatsoever, and the tenant could look to the advance payment of the three months’ rent only at the end of that period. The assignment of his “claim” .against the lessor by' the tenant to this plaintiff at the beginning of the second month was valueless as a transfer of a right of action, for there was no existing claim at that time. At the end of the three months, the tenant would have had a cause of action for the advance rent paid, but the lease was annulled by the parties some few days after the assignment of the purported claim, the tenant then receiving back his full advance payment as made. Had the plaintiff delayed bringing his action until the expiration of the three months, which he did not, he still would have had no cause of action, since the contract was no longer in existence at that time.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Carl Hayden Bee Research Center: Tucson, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Information
                        Africanized Honey Bees
                                    Bee Safety
                                    Online Books
                                    Other NewsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Tucson, Arizona Carl Hayden Bee Research Center Docs Africanized Honey Bees





- Africanized Honey Bee Overview
- Firefighters and Rescue Personnel
- Safety Precautions for Schools
- Africanized Bee Identification

Africanized Bee Identification Update: We can no longer analyze honeybee identification samples (morphometrics). This service has been discontinued. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:51
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:52
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:53
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:54
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:55
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:56
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:57
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:58
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:59
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:60
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:61
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:62
Case: 1:03-cr-00933 Document #: 30 Filed: 05/14/04 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:63
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR CHOICETEL COMMUNICATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,733
<PP&E>                                           8,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,345
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,800
<SALES>                                          2,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,435
<CGS>                                            1,187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (180)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (81)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (180)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (99)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 116 Filed: 10/07/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:687
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1056

To provide for farm-related exemptions from certain hazardous materials

transportation requirements.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 23, 1997

Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. COATS, and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To provide for farm-related exemptions from certain

hazardous materials transportation requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FARM-RELATED EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN

4 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION

5 REQUIREMENTS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—No provision of a final rule relat7 ing to the intrastate transportation of hazardous materials

8 issued by the Secretary of Transportation under the rule9 making proceeding under docket number HM–200 that

10 prohibits a State from granting an exemption for not-for-
2

•S 1056 IS

1 hire intrastate transportation by farmers and farm-related

2 service industries shall take effect with respect to that not3 for-hire intrastate transportation before the date specified

4 in subsection (b).

5 (b) DATE.—The date specified in this subsection is

6 the later of—

7 (1) October 1, 1999; or

8 (2) the date on which funds are authorized to

9 be appropriated for fiscal year 1998 to carry out

10 chapter 51 of title 49, United States Code.

Æ
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research: Lubbock, TX
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Projects
                        NP 301Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lubbock, Texas Cropping Systems Research Laboratory Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

People and Locations at Lubbock, Texas   [Expand All] [Collapse All]
  (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov