alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1171 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1171

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
          For the relief of Janina Altagracia Castillo-Rojas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF CITIZENSHIP.

    (a) Citizenship Status.--Upon the filing of an application for a 
certificate of citizenship and upon being administered the oath of 
renunciation and allegiance described in section 337(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, Janina Altagracia Castillo-Rojas shall 
be held and considered to be a citizen of the United States from birth 
pursuant to section 301(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1401(g)) and shall be furnished by the Attorney General with a 
certificate of citizenship.
    (b) Supersedes Existing Law.--This section supersedes the parental 
physical presence requirement in section 301(g) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401(g)) and any other provision of law.

            Passed the Senate October 15 (legislative day, October 2), 
      1998.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1171

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

          For the relief of Janina Altagracia Castillo-Rojas.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Santos, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 860]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan M. Merchan, J., at hearing; Arlene Goldberg, J., at plea and sentencing), rendered July 22, 2010, as amended August 11, 2010, convicting defendant of attempted burglary in the second degree (four counts) and burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

At the suppression hearing, the People sustained their burden of showing that the police conduct at issue was legal *(see e.g. People v Boone,*269 AD2d 459 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 961 [2000]). The hearing evidence sufficiently established that defendant was arrested on a parole violation warrant, and defendant never challenged the validity of the warrant. Defendant complains that testimony given by detectives who were not present when defendant was arrested left questions unanswered about the circumstances of the arrest. However, none of these questions were material in this case, given that the basis of the arrest was an unchallenged arrest warrant.

The sentencing court properly adjudicated defendant a persistent violent felony offender under the relevant statute *(see People v Walker,*81 NY2d 661, 664-666 [1993]), and defendant’s arguments to the contrary are without merit. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41984-41985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16608]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Exploiting Genome or Epigenome Editing to 
Functionally Validate Genes or Variants

[[Page 41985]]

Involved in Substance Use Disorders (R21/R33 Clinical Trial Not 
Allowed).
    Date: September 23, 2021.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ipolia R. Ramadan, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Policy and Review, Division of 
Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 
North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-
4471, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1361727e7277727d7a61537e727a7f3d7d7a7b3d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2153404c4045404f4853614c40484d0f4f48490f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 30, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-16608 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 885 

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to reauthorize 

a provision relating to additional contract authority for States with 

Indian reservations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2011 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to reauthorize a provision relating to additional 

contract authority for States with Indian reservations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian School Bus 

5 Route Safety Reauthorization Act of 2011’’. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 885 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL CONTRACT AU2 THORITY FOR STATES WITH INDIAN RES3 ERVATIONS. 

4 Section 1214(d)(5)(A) of the Transportation Equity 

5 Act for the 21st Century (23 U.S.C. 202 note; 112 Stat. 

6 206; 119 Stat. 1460) is amended by striking ‘‘$1,800,000 

7 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2017’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          35,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         134,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,647,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,440
<OTHER-SE>                                    (656,071)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,647,030
<SALES>                                      2,450,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,450,958
<CGS>                                        1,812,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,349,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,956,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,956,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,956,307)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.30)
        
  

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steven L. Muellner, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meade Instruments Corp.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
January 14, 2008

|By: |  | /s/STEVEN L. MUELLNERSteven L. Muellner President and CEO |  | 
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,720
<PP&E>                                          65,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,917
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,554
<SALES>                                        129,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,539
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,532
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,007
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
      undersigned hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      They
      are the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively of
      SpaceDev, Inc. (the "Company");





2.
      The
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
      30, 2006, that this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and,





3.
      The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 14, 2007      /s/
      Mark N. Sirangelo


Mark
      N.
      Sirangelo


Chief
      Executive Officer





And;


/s/
      Richard B.
      Slansky


Richard
      B. Slansky


President
      and Chief Financial Officer
#### JOHN L. MERRIAM v. THE UNITED STATES.

(107 U. S. R., on appeal from 14 C. Cls. R., 289.)

A contract binds the claimant to supply at the military station at Bismarck “ 600,000 poánds, more,or less, of oats, at |2.23^ per 100 pounds, or such other quantity, more or less, as may be required from time to-time for the wants of said station between the 1st July, 1877, and the 31st December, 1877, in such quantities and at such times as the receiving officer may require.” He delivers and is paid for the 600,000 pounds specifically named in the contract. But he is not required by the receiving officer to supply more, though he is ready and willing to do so; and the quartermaster who made the contract buys oats of other parties for the wants of the station. The claimant insists that he was entitled to supply them, and brings his action fo,r the profits which he might have made.

Held by the Court of Claims, dismissing the petition:

I.A contract which binds the contractor to supply at a military station “9600,000 pounds, more or less, of oats, or such other quantity, more or less, as may be required from time to time for the wants of said station between the 1st July and the 31st December, in such quantities and at such times as the receiving officer may require,” does not. entitle him to furnish all the oats which may be needed at the station; nor, after he has supplied the specified quantity of 600,000-pounds, does it preclude the defendants from buying from other parties.

II.The word “or” in a contract will not be construed to mean “and”' w-here it connects propositions reasonable in the alternative.

III.Where a contract is partly in print and partly in writing, the written portion will be deemed the part more carefully considered by the parties when they made the contract.

*761IV. When the terms of a contract are ambiguous, the parties may adopt such a construction as they expressly or by tacit concurrence agree upon; and after one of them has incurred expense or otherwise acted on the faith of it, the other cannot set up a new interpretation.

Held by the Supreme Court:

The judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing the petition was right and is affirmed.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Woods,

resting the decision principally upon the same ground as, that stated above by the Court of Claims as the first point.
# C_2020068EN.01003301.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/33

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 4 December 2019 — Tesco Stores ČR a.s. v Ministerstvo zemědělství

(Case C-881/19)

(2020/C 68/36)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Krajský soud v Brně

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tesco Stores ČR a.s.

Defendant: Ministerstvo zemědělství

Question referred

Should the rule set out in point 2(a) of part E of Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 be interpreted such that, with respect to a food intended for an end consumer in the Czech Republic, a compound ingredient listed in point 2(c) of part A of Annex I to Directive 2000/36/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 June 2000 relating to cocoa and chocolate products intended for human consumption, as amended, may only be listed among the ingredients of the product without a precise specification of its composition if that compound ingredient is labelled precisely in line with the Czech language version of Annex I to Directive 2000/36/EC?

---

(1)  OJ 2011 L 304, p. 18.

(2)  OJ 2000 L 197, p. 19.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert J. Michel, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                              |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|/s/    Robert J. Michel       |  | 
|Robert J. Michel             
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: January 28, 2013

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the 10-K/A as a separate disclosure statement.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Spencer, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 889] —

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Grella, J.), rendered July 21, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders *v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128588 & (45) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128588 COA: 252596 Wayne CC: 03-008511-01 KEVIN DIONTO-DELANO THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Defendant’s motion to remand is DENIED.

t1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
Case 1:02-cv-06376 Document 1 Filed 09/06/2002 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:02-cv-06376 Document 1 Filed 09/06/2002 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:02-cv-06376 Document 1 Filed 09/06/2002 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:02-cv-06376 Document 1 Filed 09/06/2002 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:02-cv-06376 Document 1 Filed 09/06/2002 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:02-cv-06376 Document 1 Filed 09/06/2002 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:02-cv-06376 Document 1 Filed 09/06/2002 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:02-cv-06376 Document 1 Filed 09/06/2002 Page 8 of 8