alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17054 and #17055; Pennsylvania Disaster Number PA-00111]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania dated 07/29/2021. Incident: Flash Flooding. Incident Period: 07/12/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 07/29/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* 09/27/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:* 04/29/2022.
 ADDRESSES: *Submit completed loan applications to:* U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Bucks, Philadelphia, Tioga. *Contiguous Counties:* Pennsylvania: Bradford, Delaware, Lehigh, Lycoming, Montgomery, Northampton, Potter. New Jersey: Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, Hunterdon, Mercer, Warren. New York: Chemung, Steuben. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.625Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.760Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17054 6 and for economic injury is 17055 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-16532 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

s0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147769

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147769

COA: 314389

Isabella CC: 10-001295-FC

BRANDON LOVELL GOODWIN, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
# C_2019295EN.01004201.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/42

---

Action brought on 28 June 2019 — Laroni v Parliament

(Case T-415/19)

(2019/C 295/54)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Nereo Laroni (Venice, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;

| — | order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.

---
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of IBSG International, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Geoffrey Birch, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)       
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)       
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Date: June
                  13, 2006
            
            BY:
                /S/ Geoffrey Birch
              ——————————————
              Geoffrey
                Birch
              Principal
                Accounting Officer
NO. 12-14-00217-CV

IN THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

AT TYLER, TEXAS

BARBARA GAIL HARRIS,

Appellant,

v.

IN RE: FAMILY TRUST CREATED UNDER THE ESTATE

OF HAYDEN R. MAYFIELD, DECEASED

Nominal Appellee. 

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

MOTION FOR REHEARING

TO THE COURT OF APPEALS:

Barbara Gail Harris, appellant, respectfully files this motion for leave to file 

an amended motion for rehearing in this cause that is electronically accepted by 

this Court on January 6, 2015. The sole purpose of her amended motion for 

rehearing is to correct one word, in issue three presented for review, in order to 

correctly urge that judicial deference must be given to district court jurisdiction. 

ACCEPTED

12-14-00217-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

1/7/2015 10:28:34 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/7/2015 10:28:34 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant prays that leave be 

granted to file her amended motion for rehearing.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Frank L. Supercinski

FRANK. L. SUPERCINSKI

SBN: 19516000

P.O. Box 189

Longview, Texas 75606

Telephone: (903) 236-0151

Facsimile: (903) 236-0118

Email: supercinski@sbcglobal.net

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on the day that the foregoing Appellant’s Motion for Leave to 

file Amended Motion for Rehearing is electronically filed with the Twelfth Court 

of Appeals for Texas, and through the electronic filing system, a copy of it is 

served on counsel of record for appellees:

Bradley R. Echols

SBN: 06390450

BOON, SHAVER, ECHOLS, COLEMAN & GOOLSBY, PLLC

1800 W. Loop 281, Suite 303

Longview, Texas 75604

Telephone: (903) 759-2200

Facsimile: (9030 759-3306

Email: bradley.echols@boonlaw.com

/s/ Frank L. Supercinski

FRANK L. SUPERCINSKI
# Official Journal C 181A/14 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 181A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4714 July 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 181A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4714 July 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Railway Agency |
| 2004/C 181A/1 | Vacancy notice for the position of Executive Director of the European Railway Agency | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Railway Agency

2004/C 181A/1

Vacancy notice for the position of Executive Director of the European Railway Agency

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit
13.1
 
 Credicorp
Ltd.
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350)
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:
 
 1.           I
am the Chief Executive Officer of Credicorp Ltd. (the “Company”).
 
 2.           To
my knowledge:
 
 (A)        The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009
accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (B)         The
information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
February 23, 2011
 
 By: /s/ DIONISIO ROMERO P.Name:  Dionisio
      RomeroTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.49

                       Atlantic Technology Ventures, Inc.
                            150 Broadway, Suite 1009
                            New York, New York 10038



                                                     December 28, 2000

BH Capital Investments, L.P.
175 Bloor Street East
South Tower, 7th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M4W 3R8

Excalibur Limited Partnership
33 Prince Arthur Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5R IB2

Sirs:

         To confirm that Section 2(b) of the Stock Repurchase Agreement
effective December 4, 2000, between Atlantic Technology Ventures, Inc., BH
Capital Investments, L.P., and Excalibur Limited Partnership is amended to
replace the words "January 2, 2001" with the words "January 9, 2001", please
sign a copy of this letter in the space provided below and send a copy by
facsimile to Atlantic at (212) 267-2159.

                                          Sincerely yours,

                                          ATLANTIC TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, INC.


                                          By: /s/ Frederic P. Zotos
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Frederic P. Zotos
                                             President


Agreed to on December 28, 2000:

BH CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, L.P.              Excalibur Limited Partnership
By:  HB and Co., Inc., its                By: Excalibur Capital Management, Inc.
     General Partner


By: /s/ Henry Brachfeld                   By: /s/ William Hechter
   --------------------                       -------------------
   Henry Brachfeld                            William Hechter
   President                                  President
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:03-cv-07749 Document 56-4 Filed 02/10/09 Page 10 of 10
evc-ex46_6.htm



Exhibit 4.6

 

FIFTH AMENDMENT

TO THE

ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 

This Fifth Amendment to the Entravision Communications Corporation 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (“Amendment”) is made effective as of April 27, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) by Entravision Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).  All capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment shall be defined as set forth in the Plan.

 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Entravision Communications Corporation 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”).

 

WHEREAS, there have been changes in tax law and practice since the Plan was adopted.

 

WHEREAS, these changes make it desirable to amend the Plan.

 

1.NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that effective as of the Effective Date, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

 

(a)Section 7(a)(v) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

“The termination date, except that each Option must terminate no later than the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date of grant, and each Incentive Stock Option granted to any employee who, at the time the Option is granted, owns (directly or indirectly, within the meaning of Code Section 424(d)) more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or of any Subsidiary must terminate no later than the fifth (5th) anniversary of the date of grant.”

 

(b)Section 8(e) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

“The term, provided that an SAR must terminate no later than 10 years after the date of grant.”

 

2.All Other Provisions of the Plan Remain the Same.  Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all other terms, conditions and obligations contained in the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect as provided for in the Plan.

 

To record the adoption of this Amendment by the Board of Directors of the Company effective as of the Effective Date, the Company has caused its authorized officer to execute the same.

 


	
ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Walter F. Ulloa

	
Name:
	
 
	
Walter F. Ulloa

	
Title:
	
 
	
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Timothy Forsyth, Respondent, v Staten Island Developmental Disabilities Services Office et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 907]—

Lahtinen, J.

Appeals from two decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 15, 2010 and July 21, 2011, which, among other things, determined that claimant was concurrently employed and established his average weekly wage.

Claimant was involved in an automobile accident and injured *1394his head and left shoulder during the course of his year-round weekend employment as a lifeguard with the Staten Island Developmental Disabilities Services Office (hereinafter the employer). After he filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits, claimant’s annual weekly wage was established by a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge using earnings from concurrent seasonal employment as a lifeguard for the City of New York. On administrative appeal, as relevant here, the Workers’ Compensation Board ultimately affirmed the finding of concurrent employment. The employer and its workers’ compensation carrier now appeal.

We affirm. The record demonstrates that claimant was employed on weekends by the employer year round for 12 years and had been seasonally employed for the City of New York between the months of May and September since 1978. Claimant worked for both employers concurrently during the previous 12 summers, participated in training and received a promotion with respect to his seasonal employment during the off season and returned to his seasonal lifeguard position following the injury. As such, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was concurrently employed *(see*Workers’ Compensation Law § 14 [6]; *Matter of Webb v TAD Temporaries,*274 AD2d 767, 769 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 768 [2000]; *Stone Bridge Farm,*2010 WL 2752803, *2, 2010 NY Wrk Comp LEXIS 6027, *3-4 [WCB No. G011 5175, July 8, 2010]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 21.1
  Subsidiary
    Companies
  JurisdictionUnder

PercentageName

Which Organized

OwnedAsta Funding, Inc.

DelawareAsta Funding Acquisition I, LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta Funding Acquisition II, LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta Funding Acquisition IV, LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta Commercial, LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta Funding.com, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition I, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition II, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition IV, LLC

Delaware


100
%Computer Finance, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Collection, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition V, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition VI, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition VII, LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition VIII, LLC

Delaware


100
%Option Card, LLC

Colorado


100
%Palisades Acquisition IX, LLC

Delaware


100
%VATIV Recovery Solutions LLC

Texas


100
%Palisades Acquisition X, LLC

Delaware


100
%Cliffs Portfolio Acquisition I, LLC

Delaware


100
%Sylvan Acquisition I. LLC

Delaware


100
%Citizens Lending Group LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XI LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XII LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XIII LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XIV LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XV LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XVI LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XVII LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades Acquisition XVIII LLC

Delaware


100
%Brook Mays Joint Venture

Massachusetts


25
%Ventura Services LLC

Delaware


100
%Palisades XII Do Brasil Gesto Financeira Ltda

Brazil


99.9
%LBLINY, LLC

Delaware


100
%ELR Holdings LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta GFN LLC

Delaware


100
%Asta Charthill, LLC

Delaware


100
%Prestiga Funding, LLC

Delaware


100
%  48
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of SpaceDev, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ending  September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
W.  Benson,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Sec.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant to Sec.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

          (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  November  15,  2004


                                                     By:  /s/  James  W.  Benson
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                               James  W.  Benson
                                                       Chief  Executive  Officer
# C_2019399EN.01007501.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/75

---

Action brought on 16 September 2019 – Ace of spades v EUIPO – Krupp and Borrmann (Shape of Champagne Grande reserve bottle)

(Case T-621/19)

(2019/C 399/93)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ace of spades Holdings LLC (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: A. Gómez López, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gerhard Ernst Krupp (Munich, Germany) and Elmar Borrmann (Reith, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicants of the trade mark at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union tridimensional mark (Shape of Champagne Grande reserve bottle) – Application for registration No 16 252 637

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2019 in Case R 2/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | upheld the present Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

upheld the present Appeal;

| — | annul the contested decision, and/or set aside the contested decision due to erroneous application of Articles 8(1) (b) EUTMR and 8(5) EUTMR and enter a finding to the effect that there does exist likelihood of confusion between the confronted trademarks; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, and/or set aside the contested decision due to erroneous application of Articles 8(1) (b) EUTMR and 8(5) EUTMR and enter a finding to the effect that there does exist likelihood of confusion between the confronted trademarks;

| — | order the defendant (and intervener, if he enters an appearance in proceedings) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant (and intervener, if he enters an appearance in proceedings) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1) (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1) (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---