T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T T OA R P UT R A F AJ AR LU M I N G K EW A S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72207 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 634- 589 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T oarP utr aF a

j arL um i ngke w a s , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd is m is s in g h is appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f or asyl u m , w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al , an dp ro t ect i o n u n d er th e C o n v en t i o n A g ai n st 

# FI LED MA R 01 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72207 2 T ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de n o v o q u e s tio n s o f

law a n df

o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H older , 5 5 8 F . 3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e d o n o t a d d r e s s L u m in g k e w a s ’s a r g u m e n ts r e g ar d in g th e tim e lin e s s o f h is a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n b e c au s e th e B I A a d dr e s s e dh is a s y lu m c la im o n th e m e r its . S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s pa s tpe r s e c ut i on f i ndi ng be c aus e the s to n in g o f

L u m in g k e w a s ’s c h u r c h d idn o t c o n s titu te p e r s e c u tio n , se e i d. a t1059- 60 ( “ di s c r i m i na t orym i s tr e a tm e nt ” i nc l udi ng tw o i nc i de nt s of be a t i ng and r obbe ryand be i ng a c c os t e d byahos t i l e m ob di d notc om pe l af i ndi ng of pa s tpe r s e c ut i on) , and L um i ngke w a s di d nots how the gove rnm e ntw a s unabl e orunw i l l i ng t o c ontr ol the m e n w h o a tta c k e dh im o n C h r is tm a s E v e , se e Castro-P er ezv. G on zales , 409 F . 3d 1 0 6 9 , 1 0 7 2 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 5 ). S ub stan ti al ev id en ce also su p p o rts th e a g en cy ’s f i ndi ng tha tL um i ngke w a s f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h aw e l l - f ounde d f e arof pe r s e c ut i on be c aus e , e ve n unde rdi s f a vor e d gr oup a na l y s i s , he di d notde m ons tr a t e s uf f i c i e nt in d iv idu a liz e dr is k . See H al i m v. H older , 590 F . 3d 971, 979 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( p e titio n e rf

a ile dto s h o w h e w a s in d iv idu a llytar g e te do rlik e lyto b e in d iv idu a lly t ar get ed w here he “ fa i l ed t o o ff erany e vi dence thatdi st i ng ui shes hi s e xp osure f r o m th o s e o f

a ll o th e re th n ic C h in e s e I n d o n e s ian s ” ) ; c f. Sa e l v . A s h c r o

ft , 386 F . 3d 922, 927- 29 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . M or e ove r , the r e c or d doe s notc om pe l the c onc l us i on09- 72207 3 th a t th e r e is ap a tte rn o rp r a c tic e o f p e r s e c u tio n a g a in s t C h r is tian s in I n d o n e s ia . See W a kka ry , 5 5 8 F .3 da t 1 0 6 0 - 6 2 . A c c o r d in g ly , w e d e n yth e p e titio n a s to Lu mi n g k e w a s ’ s a s y l u m c l a i m. B e c aus e L um i ngke w a s f a i l e d t o m e e tthe l ow e rs t anda r d of pr oof f or a s y lu m , h is c la im f

o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l n e c e s s ar ilyf

a ils . See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). L u m in g k e w a s d idn o t c h a lle n g e th e a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f C A T r e lie f

. See M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) ( i s s ue s not spec i fi ca l l y r ai se d and ar gu ed i n a party’ s openi ng bri ef ar e w ai ved). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.