alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I hereby
certify that:

         I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K;

         to the best of my knowledge, this Annual Report on Form 10-K (i) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d); and (ii) the information
contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of Tengasco, Inc. and its
subsidiaries during the period covered by this Report.

Dated: March 30, 2004



                                    s/Mark A. Ruth
                                      -------------
                                    Mark A. Ruth,
                                    Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Minute Origin (06/97)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge i 2 Sitting Judge if Other
or Magistrate Judge Milton I. Shadur than Assigned Judge
CASE NUMBER 03 C 9417 DATE 1/23/2004
CASE Kevin Snulligan vs. Selector Attorney General
TITLE
[in the following box (a) indicate the party filing the motion, e.g., plaintiff, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the nature
MOTION: of the motion being presented.)

Notified counsel by telephone.
Docketing to mail notices.
Mail AO 450 form.

Copy to judge/magistrate judge.

courtroom
deputy’s
initials

SN

DOCKET ENTRY:
(0D) a Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]
(2) o Brief in support of motion due
(3) im] Answer brief to motion due___._ Reply to answer brief due.
(4) oOo Ruling/Hearingon___—_—ssetfor__—_at
(5) Oo Status hearing[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for] on setfor at.
(6) Oo Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for] on setfor. at.
(7) Oo Trial[set for/re-set for] on___ at
(8) Oo [Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continuedto_at__— i.
(9) a) This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agreement/pursuant to]
OOFRCP4¢m) Local Rule 41.1. COFRCP41(a)(1) OO FRCP41(a)(2).
Ce | [Other docket entry] Enter Memorandum Order. Snulligan’s motion to amend is denied. (11-1)
(ii) [For further detail see order attached to the original minute order.]
No notices required, advised in open court. Document
No notices required. umber of ntiess Number
Y | Notices mailed by judge’s staff.

AN 26 2004

date docketed

docketing deputy initials

1/23/2004

[2

date muailed notice

sn

Oras :
US" Ubaletifnd received in
central Clerk’s Office

mailing depot initials



ee

%

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
KEVIN SNULLIGAN #10587-424,

Plaintiff,

DOCKETED

JAN 2 6 2004

SELECTOR ATTORNEY GENERAL, etc.,
et. al.,

)
)
)
)
v- ) No. 03 C 9417
)
)
)
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM ORDER

Like the Energizer Bunny, pro se plaintiff Kevin Snulligan
keeps going and going. In his just-received “Motion To Amend” he
seeks to add an entire group of new defendants to this action,
which this Court's January 15, 2004 memorandum order (“Order”)
has already dismissed. None of those proposed defendants would

place this case in a different posture from the one that, as the

Order explained, called for dismissal. Hence the Motion To Amend

Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge

is denied.

Date: January 23, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Terrence Doyle MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-51140

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 7, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Terrence Doyle Mitchell, Bastrop, TX, pro se.

*79Before BENAVIDES, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Terrence Doyle Mitchell, federal prisoner #04106-180, appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for specific performance or reinstatement of his direct appeal. In his motion, Mitchell contended that his plea agreement was breached and that counsel was ineffective for failing to prosecute a direct appeal. Mitchell’s district court motion was an attempt to collaterally attack his sentence by raising errors that occurred at sentencing or during the period for pursuing a direct appeal. As such, the motion should have been construed by the district court as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. *See Tolliver v. Dobre,*211 F.3d 876, 877 (5th Cir.2000); *see also United States v. Rich,*141 F.3d 550, 551 (5th Cir.1998). Such a recharac-terization of Mitchell’s motion has important consequences of which Mitchell should be apprised. *See Castro v. United States,*540 U.S. 375, 383, 124 S.Ct. 786, 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003). Also, because Mitchell’s motion was in the nature of a 2255 motion, we lack jurisdiction over his appeal absent ruling on a certificate of appealability in the district court. *See United States v. Youngblood,*116 F.3d 1113, 1114-15 (5th Cir.1997).

The judgment of the district court is VACATED and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of First Commonwealth, Inc. as of December 31,
1996, and for the twelve months then ended, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         15,817
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                      290
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21,023
<PP&E>                                          3,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,331
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            4
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34,454
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               44,099
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  40,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  104
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,595
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.76



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity  as  an  officer  of  SpaceDev,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  that,  to his
knowledge,  the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of the Company on
Form  10-QSB  for  the  period ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and  that  the  information  contained  in  such  report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company  as  of  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented  in the financial
statements  included  in  such  report.

Dated:  December 1,  2005


                                   By:  /s/  James  W.  Benson
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        James  W.  Benson
                                        Chief  Executive  Officer
# Official Journal C 275/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 275 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6320 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 275

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6320 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 275/01 | Euro exchange rates — 19 August 2020 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 275/01

Euro exchange rates — 19 August 2020

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | EFTA Court |
| 2020/C 275/02 | Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 27 March 2020 in the case of The Norwegian Government v Anniken Jenny Lindberg (Case E-3/20) | 2 |
| 2020/C 275/03 | Action brought on 10 July 2020 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Kingdom of Norway (Case E-9/20) | 4 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

EFTA Court

2020/C 275/02

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 27 March 2020 in the case of The Norwegian Government v Anniken Jenny Lindberg (Case E-3/20)

2

2020/C 275/03

Action brought on 10 July 2020 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Kingdom of Norway (Case E-9/20)

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30164 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VELTA FERGINS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CR-50061-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Velta Fergins appeals her guilty-plea conviction for misapplication of credit union funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 657. She contends that the district court erred in refusing to grant a downward departure for acceptance of responsibility in addition to the two-level reduction in her offense level under § 3E1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines based on her exceptional degree of contrition. She also argues that the district court erred in refusing to grant a downward departure under § 5K2.16 of the Guidelines because she voluntarilyNo. 98-30164 -2- disclosed the offense and because it was unlikely to have been discovered otherwise. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the district court’s refusal to grant a downward departure to Fergins based on her exceptional acceptance of responsibility or her voluntary disclosure of the offense. See United States v.
Brace , 145 F.3d 247, 263 (5th Cir. 1998)(en banc). We may review such a refusal only if the district court mistakenly assumed that it lacked authority to depart downward or if the refusal to grant a downward departure was the result of a violation of law or a misapplication of the Guidelines. Neither basis has been demonstrated herein. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Document

Exhibit 10.1


PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL


HAND DELIVERY








To: André Calantzopoulos                             Lausanne, April 28, 2021






Dear André, 


We are pleased to confirm your appointment, effective May 5, 2021, to the position of Executive Chairman.


Your gross base salary will be:     CHF 1,000,000.-- annually                  CHF 76,923.08 monthly    


You will be removed from the Company’s salary grade structure.


You will no longer be eligible to participate in the Incentive Compensation Award Program.


You will continue to be eligible to participate in the Equity Award Program, which is administered at the sole discretion of the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee of the Board of Directors of Philip Morris International Inc. pursuant and subject to the terms of the 2017 Performance Incentive Plan (or any similar plan adopted from time to time). 


Your annual Equity Award target will be as follows:
						
		Target % (1)

		
	Equity Award	300% of annual base salary (40% in the form of Restricted Stock Units and 60% in the form of Performance Share Units)





It is agreed and understood that this letter will for all purposes be regarded as a continuation of your employment with Philip Morris Products S.A.


All other conditions relating to your employment with Philip Morris Products S.A. remain as stated in your employment contract and, if applicable, in any subsequent amendments.


We would like to take this opportunity to wish you continued success and satisfaction.


Yours sincerely,


PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.








						
	/s/ CHARLES BENDOTTI	/s/ CONSTANTIN ROMANOV
	Charles Bendotti	Constantin Romanov
	Global Head of People & Culture	Global Head of Total Rewards


												
	Read and approved:	/s/ ANDRÉ CALANTZOPOULOS
	Date:
	______________

	

	(André Calantzopoulos)
	

	






(1)  The Equity Award Program is discretionary and does not obligate the Company to make an award nor entitles employees to receive an award. Eligibility to participate in the Program does not guarantee receipt of an award and receiving an annual award does not guarantee receipt of an award in the future. Any awards that are made may be higher or lower than the target mentioned above. Targets may be amended at the discretion of the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee of the Board of Directors at any time without prior notice.
Philip Morris Products S.A., Avenue de Rhodanie 50, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland  
T:+41 (58) 242 00 00, F: +41 (58) 242 01 01
Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 117 Filed: 03/25/04 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:729

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 117 Filed: 03/25/04 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:730

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 117 Filed: 03/25/04 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:731

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 117 Filed: 03/25/04 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:732

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 117 Filed: 03/25/04 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:733

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 117 Filed: 03/25/04 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:734

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 117 Filed: 03/25/04 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:735

Case: 1:03-cr-00011 Document #: 117 Filed: 03/25/04 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:736
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRAYONE MAURICE BURTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1)

Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: March 2, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Trayone Maurice Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley Duane 

Ragsdale, John David Rowell, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant 

United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Trayone Burton appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his 

request for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Burton, No. 3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We deny 

Burton’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 2.3

Eastern Division

Katherine Albrecht, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:03−cv−06472

Hon. Morton

Denlow

Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, March 31, 2005:

 MINUTE entry before Judge Morton Denlow : Status hearing reset for 4/14/2005

at 10:00 AM. on request of the parties. Status hearing set for 3/31/05 is stricken.Judicial

staff mailed notice(dmk, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 62 Filed: 03/31/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:398
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Production Systems Research: Stoneville, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About CPSRU
                        CPSRU Mission StatementSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Stoneville, Mississippi Crop Production Systems Research People





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Unit Publication Lists with PDFs
- Contact Information
- Publications
- Publications - PDF Links
- Research Projects

Reginald S Fletcher    Research Agronomist  **Dr. Reginald Fletcher****Research Agronomist Crop Production Systems Research Unit 141 Experiment Station Road PO Box 350 Stoneville, MS  38776 Office: 662.686.5298 FAX:    662.686.5422 Email:  Reginald.Fletcher@usda.gov**


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Improvement and Protection Research: Salinas, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Salinas, California Crop Improvement and Protection Research People Eric B. Brennan







Contact Informationheadline bar /ARSUserFiles/21904/Photos/Mail icon from ppt rs.png Eric Brennan USDA Agricultural Research Service 1636 East Alisal Street Salinas, CA 93905 U.S.A.  /ARSUserFiles/21904/Photos/phone icon from ppt rs.png Phone:  831-755-2822 Fax: 831-755-2814 Email: Eric.Brennan@usda.gov  Return to Eric Brennan's Home Page


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov