alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 343/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 343 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5916 December 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 343

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5916 December 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2016/2210 of Amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2016 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2016/2210 of Amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2016

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 21(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

Budgetary remarks are only executable insofar as they do not modify or extend the scope of an existing legal base, impinge on the administrative autonomy of institutions and can be covered by available resources (as indicated in the annex to the executability letter dated 28 October 2015).

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1273

TINA JENKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:14-cv-00702-TDC)

Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tina Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert R. Niccolini, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH 

SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Tina Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment 

to MV Transportation, Inc. in Jenkins’ employment action. Parties to a civil action are 

accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an 

appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, the district court may extend the time to 

file a notice of appeal if a party moves for an extension of the appeal period within 30 

days after the expiration of the original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect 

or good cause to warrant an extension. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5); see Washington v. 

Bumgarner, 882 F.2d 899, 900-01 (4th Cir. 1989). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of 

appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007). 

The district court’s final judgment was entered on the docket on January 25, 2018. 

Jenkins’ notice of appeal was filed on March 8, 2018, after the expiration of the 30-day 

appeal period but within the excusable neglect period. Because Jenkins’ notice of appeal 

offered some excuse for her untimeliness and requested that the district court accept her 

notice of appeal upon receipt, we construe it as a timely request for an extension of time 

to file an appeal. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing 

the district court to determine whether the time for filing a notice of appeal should be 

extended under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). The record, as supplemented, will then be 

returned to this court for further consideration. 

REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           5,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                       451
<INVENTORY>                                     24,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,004
<PP&E>                                         170,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,047
<BONDS>                                        188,351
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,445
<SALES>                                        370,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               370,421
<CGS>                                          307,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  307,313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

Opinion issued February 24, 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00913
- CV

——————————— VIRIAN REYES , Appellant

V. SAN LUCAS APARTMENTS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1053559

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant , Virian Reyes , has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20.1 ; see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § § 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 ( West 201 3 ); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and2

Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX
. R. A PP
. P . app. A § B(1)

. Further, appellant ha s not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee fo r preparing the clerk’s record or the reporter’s record

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b) , (c)

. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 ; 42.3 (b)

. We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution . We dismiss any pending motions as moot

.

PER CURIAM Panel con sists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle

.
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:02-cv-01777 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/17/03 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:220
Case: 1:01-cv-03081 Document #: 125 Filed: 12/23/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:584
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Nolan, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), *937both rendered October 21,1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised upon appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal L 363/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 363 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6412 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 363

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6412 October 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2021/1790 of 5 October 2021 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea on certain aspects of air services | 1 |
| | * | Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea on certain aspects of air services | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2021/1790 of 5 October 2021 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea on certain aspects of air services

1

*

Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea on certain aspects of air services

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>   1






EX-11.1


                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                              YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                              --------------------

                                                      2000           1999              1998
                                                      ----           ----              ----

<S>                                             <C>             <C>                <C>
Net income (loss)                               $     236,653   $   979,074        $(8,727,144)
Weighted average common shares outstanding         19,442,115     9,857,252          9,626,335
                                                   ----------     ---------          ---------
Net income (loss) per share                                       $    0.10        $     (0.91)
</TABLE>
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 3, 2020

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00995-CR

DAMON KENDRICK DOVE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-DCR-061181A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from the trial court’s “Order on Intervenor’s 

Petition In Intervention and Motion to Unseal Court Records.” Generally, we only 

have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant when there has been 

a final judgment of conviction. See Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 

1996, no pet.). The order on appeal is not a final judgment of conviction. 

On January 23, 2020, we notified the parties that the appeal would be 
2

dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has 

jurisdiction. No response has been received.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,333
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,014
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,586
<PP&E>                                         141,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,751
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,359
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,030
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,637
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,456
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,456
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.41


</TABLE>
Opinion issued November 7, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00916-CV

———————————

IN RE PURPLE ZONE AUTO BROKERS, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Purple Zone Auto Brokers, LLC, has filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus challenging an order denying its motion to designate an unknown

responsible third party under Section 33.004(j) of the Texas Civil Practice and 

Remedies Code.1 We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas-Molloy, and Guerra.

1 The underlying case is Victor Sanchez Abundiz and Victor Sanchez Gomez v. Shafi

Mustafa Khalifa James and Purple Zone Auto Brokers, L.L.C., cause number 2021-

55505, pending in the 129th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable 

Michael Gomez presiding.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Rivera, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on November 4, 1983, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.
# L_2004347EN.01012701.xml

| 23.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 347/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 347/127

---

CORRIGENDA

Corrigendum to the Official Journal of the European Union L 53 of 23 February 2004, L 128 of 29 April 2004, L 147 of 30 April 2004 and L 148 of 30 April 2004

Official Journal of the European Union

The boxed text which appears on page I/9 of OJ L 53 and on the second cover pages of OJ L 128, L 147 and L 148 is replaced by the following text:

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 92 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 92

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Bureau of 
Labor Statistics alone should make any adjustments, if any are needed, 
     to the methodology used to determine the Consumer Price Index.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 1997

 Mrs. Maloney of New York (for herself, Mr. Kennedy of Massachusetts, 
    and Mr. Gonzalez) submitted the following resolution; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Bureau of 
Labor Statistics alone should make any adjustments, if any are needed, 
     to the methodology used to determine the Consumer Price Index.

Whereas the Consumer Price Index currently informs our Nation's monetary policy 
        and determines both the level of taxes paid and the amount of government 
        benefits received by millions of Americans, many of them on fixed 
        incomes;
Whereas the Consumer Price Index is assumed in these uses to be an accurate and 
        appropriate measurement;
Whereas the Consumer Price Index is only useful if it is a technical, not a 
        political measurement;
Whereas it is of the utmost importance to maintain the integrity and objectivity 
        of the determination process and of the reliability of the Federal 
        statistical system; and
Whereas it is the Bureau of Labor Statistics that has the expertise, tools, 
        resources, and experience to maintain this integrity and objectivity: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the Bureau of Labor Statistics alone should make any adjustments, if 
any are needed, to the methodology used to determine the Consumer Price 
Index.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 14.7 Consent of Independent Accountants To the Board of Directors of
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce S.A. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File
Nos. 333-110867; 333-10867-01) of CVRD and Vale Overseas of our report dated January
21st, 2004 on the financial statements of Navegação Vale do Rio Doce  DOCENAVE, which
appear in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of CVRD and Vale Overseas for the year ended December
31st, 2004. /s/ Deloitte Touche TohmatsuDELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
 May 30th, 2005
Exhibit 32.2



Exhibit 32.2 - Certification of Principal Financial Officer



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for the year ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sandra T. Everett, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sandra T. EverettSandra T. EverettController and Chief Accounting OfficerDate: October 11, 2005