alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification Furnished Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kerry J. ChauvinBy:Kerry J. ChauvinChief Executive OfficerJuly 30, 2010/s/ Robin A. SeibertBy:Robin A. SeibertChief Financial OfficerJuly 30, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. and will be retained by
Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 19, 2022

NO. 03-21-00244-CV

Appellant, Richard Witt Duncan// Cross-Appellants, Prewett Rentals Series 2 752 Military, 

LLC, Tami Jan, Ward Galbreath, Sumit Kapoor, Rachel Kapoor, Nakul Jeirath, Tasha 

Jeirath, Mark L. Reis, Janis R. Reis, Charles A. Bess, Jr., Dancee D. Bess, Christopher 

Bellshaw, Catherine Bellshaw, Santos S. Salinas, and Debra Salinas, Appellant

v.

Appellees, Prewett Rentals Series 2 752 Military, LLC, Tami Jan, Ward Galbreath, Sumit 

Kapoor, Rachel Kapoor, Nakul Jeirath, Tasha Jeirath, Mark L. Reis, Janis R. Reis, 

Charles A. Bess, Jr., Dancee D. Bess, Christopher Bellshaw, Catherine Bellshaw, Santos S. 

Salinas, and Debra Salinas// Cross-Appellee, Richard Witt Duncan, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on June 28, 2021. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Each party shall pay the costs 

of the appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and in the court below.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1016 Referred in House (RFH)]







105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1016


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 1998

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in New 
                    Jersey, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 6 of Public Law 100-515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``$1,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$4,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``five'' and inserting 
        ``10''.

            Passed the Senate October 2, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.`
916 F.2d 13

#### UNITED STATES of America v. Jay L. GIBSON, Appellant.

No. 90-3148.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 2, 1990.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the court’s order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as moot filed July 24, 1990, and the letters dated August 6 and 13, 1990, in response thereto; the supplemental motion to dismiss as moot; the motion to dismiss appeal and the response thereto; and the motions to amend, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the unopposed motion to dismiss as moot be granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the district court order of May 4, 1990, 737 F.Supp. 100, be vacated. *See United States v. Miller,*685 F.2d 123 (5th Cir.1982); *Lettsome v. Waggoner,*672 F.Supp. 858, 861 n. 4 (D.V.I.1987). *Cf. United States v. Munsingwear,*340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950). As to the other district court orders which Brunwasser requests be vacated, the court finds that the reasons which generally support vacatur are not present in the other orders. *See Munsingwear,*340 U.S. at 39, 71 S.Ct. at 106. Also, in the unlikely event that the issue arises in another case, Brunwasser would be free to raise the fact that his contentions were never addressed in an appeal. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Gibson’s remaining motions be dismissed as moot.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. *See*D.C.Cir. Rule 15.
# Official Journal L 320/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 320 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6410 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 320

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6410 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | * | Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/1459 of 9 September 2021 amending Council Recommendation (EU) 2020/912 on the temporary restriction on non-essential travel into the EU and the possible lifting of such restriction | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

RECOMMENDATIONS

*

Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/1459 of 9 September 2021 amending Council Recommendation (EU) 2020/912 on the temporary restriction on non-essential travel into the EU and the possible lifting of such restriction

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Appellant, v Marine Midland Bank, N. A., as Successor of Marine Midland Bank and Another, Respondent.

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Broadway Financial Corporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-17331and No. 333-102138) on Form S-8 of Broadway Financial Corporation of our report dated February 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Broadway Financial Corporation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations and comprehensive earnings, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-KSBof Broadway Financial Corporation. 

 

/s/ KPMGLLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

March 30, 2005
Case: 1:02-cv-02525 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/25/02 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:53
Case: 1:02-cv-02525 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/25/02 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:54
Case: 1:02-cv-02525 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/25/02 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:55
Case: 1:02-cv-02525 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/25/02 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:56
Case: 1:02-cv-02525 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/25/02 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:57
Case: 1:02-cv-02525 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/25/02 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:58
Case: 1:02-cv-02525 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/25/02 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:59
Case: 1:02-cv-02525 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/25/02 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:60
Case: 1:02-cv-02525 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/25/02 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:61
Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002
(18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted),  Richard  B. Slansky, Chief Financial
Officer of SpaceDev, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of
his  knowledge:

     The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and the information
contained  in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

     IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of this
15th  day  of  May  2003.




     By:  /s/  Richard  B.  Slansky
          -------------------------
     Richard  B.  Slansky
     CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20812

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ANIBAR MARTINEZ ALVAREZ, also known as Jose Anibar Alvarez, also

known as Jose Anibar Martinez-Alvarez, also known as Jose Martinez Alvarez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-720-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Anibar Martinez Alvarez appeals a sentence imposed upon revocation

of a term of supervised release, arguing that his sentence violates principles of

double jeopardy because the revocation of his supervised release was based on

the identical conduct that supports a subsequent conviction and sentence for

illegal reentry. He concedes that his argument is foreclosed, but he raises the

issue to preserve it for further review. Martinez Alvarez’s concession is correct. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-20812 Document: 00512419222 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
No. 12-20812

See Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 700-01 (2000); United States v.

Jackson, 559 F.3d 368, 371 (5th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an

extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-20812 Document: 00512419222 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
No. 75-1559.

#### Parness et ux. *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10741

GARY LYN ELKINS, ET AL, Plaintiffs GARY LYN ELKINS Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant

versus FRITZ COMPANIES INC, ET AL Defendants FRITZ COMPANIES INC Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-491-H)
August 5, 1998
Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
# Official Journal L 28/31 J

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 28 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6231 January 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 28

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6231 January 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/123 of 24 January 2019 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of air traffic management (ATM) network functions and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 677/2011 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/123 of 24 January 2019 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of air traffic management (ATM) network functions and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 677/2011 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 252/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 252 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 622 October 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 252

English edition

Legislation

Volume 622 October 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1662 of 1 October 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ironing boards originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1663 of 1 October 2019 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya | 36 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1664 of 30 September 2019 authorising a laboratory in Ukraine to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines in dogs, cats and ferrets
  (notified under document C(2019) 6906)

   (
  1
  ) | 38 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1662 of 1 October 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ironing boards originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1663 of 1 October 2019 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

36

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1664 of 30 September 2019 authorising a laboratory in Ukraine to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines in dogs, cats and ferrets
  (notified under document C(2019) 6906)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 6906)

1

38

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Harry Korakis, Appellant, v Athas Management et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Casey, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 19, 1984.

Claimant contends that the Workers’ Compensation Board erred in its award of benefits at a reduced earnings rate. The record contains the reports and/or testimony of a number of physicians, whose opinions as to the claimant’s condition range from moderate permanent partial disability to permanent total disability. In resolving the factual issue created by these conflicting expert opinions, the Board awarded claimant benefits at *1077a reduced earnings rate, concluding that he had a moderate permanent partial disability. Claimant’s argument that he should have been found to be permanently totally disabled must be rejected, for the resolution of factual issues created by the conflicting medical evidence is exclusively for the Board *(e.g., Matter of McIntosh v International Business Machs.,*105 AD2d 557).

We also reject claimant’s argument that, irrespective of whether his disability is partial or total, the award should effectively grant him benefits for a total disability since he no longer has the capacity to perform the work to which he is suited. The Board’s award is clearly based upon its acceptance of medical proof that claimant’s disability is partial and moderate, and does not entirely incapacitate him from working. The decision is supported by substantial evidence and should be affirmed.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:01-cv-04038 Document #: 31 Filed: 05/30/02 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:61
Case: 1:01-cv-04038 Document #: 31 Filed: 05/30/02 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:62
Case: 1:01-cv-04038 Document #: 31 Filed: 05/30/02 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:63
Case: 1:01-cv-04038 Document #: 31 Filed: 05/30/02 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:64
Case: 1:01-cv-04038 Document #: 31 Filed: 05/30/02 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:65
Case: 1:01-cv-04038 Document #: 31 Filed: 05/30/02 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:66
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7197

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALAND TRACY HALL, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-92, CA-98-469-R) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 8, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aland Tracy Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Aland Tracy Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hall , Nos. CR-94-92;CA-98-469-R (W.D. Va. July 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-40893, No. 333-80003, and No. 333-122834) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-132078) of OYO Geospace Corporation of our reports dated December 7, 2007, relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended September 30, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ UHY LLP 

Houston, Texas 

December 7, 2007
CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 31.2

I, Christopher Dean, certify that

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Apiva Ventures Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

June 30, 2006

_/s/ Christopher Dean_________
Christopher Dean
Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer