alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sami S. Abbasi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ SAMI S. ABBASI                                  
|Sami S. Abbasi President and Chief Executive
Officer

Dated: November 8, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |        |  |                        
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 8, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ David J. Wagner    
|                  |  | Name:  |  | David J. Wagner        
|                  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1



August 22, 2001



John A. Ryan
5001 Red Wolf Lane
Plano, TX 75093


Dear John:

     With respect to your separation agreement and release dated February 22,
2001 with Entrust, Inc., we will extend the consulting period referred to in
paragraph 15 until October 31, 2001. Also, the duration of your non-competition
obligations referred to in paragraph 12 will be extended from 63 weeks to 70
weeks. All other terms and conditions of the agreement will remain in effect. If
you agree, please sign a copy of this letter and return it to me.


                                        Yours very truly,


                                        /s/ JAY KENDRY
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Jay Kendry
                                        VP & CLO


I have read and agree to the terms
set forth in this letter.


/s/ JOHN A. RYAN
--------------------------
John A. Ryan
#### Town of Preston et al. *v.*Connecticut Siting Council et al.

Decided February 21, 1990

*Kathleen Eldergill,*in support of the petition.

*Phyllis E. Lemell,*assistant attorney general, *William Narwold*and *Karen L. Goldthwaite,*in opposition.

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 474, is denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                             Accountants' Consent


The Board of Directors
Optical Cable Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-09433
on Form S-8 of Optical Cable Corporation of our report dated December 14, 2001,
except as to note 13 to the financial statements, which is as of December 27,
2001, relating to the balance sheets of Optical Cable Corporation as of October
31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
October 31, 2001, which report appears in the October 31, 2001 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Optical Cable Corporation.


                                 /s/ KPMG LLP


Roanoke, Virginia
January 29, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41676 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FERNANDO HERNANDEZ-PUGA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-03-CR-1070-1-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Fernando Hernandez-Puga appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Hernandez-Puga contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a), his judgment must be reformed to reflect a conviction only under United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-41676 -2- that provision, and his sentence must be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment and one year of supervised release.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Hernandez-Puga acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Case: 1:01-cv-09479 Document #: 120 Filed: 08/13/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:523
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ROSE HILLS COMPANY AND
SUBSIDIARIES, FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        889
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,395
<PP&E>                                          63,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,582
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   316,717
<SALES>                                         22,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,678
<CGS>                                            3,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,668
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Alvin A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Schechter, J., at fact finding and disposition), entered May 23, 1984, adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission of acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute robbery in the third degree, and placing him on probation for two years, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The order on appeal made one of the conditions of probation that appellant have no further criminal charges filed against him during his probation. Appellant contends that such a condition is an abuse of discretion as a matter of law. We affirm on our interpretation of the condition that it does not deprive appellant, were he charged with a crime during his period of probation, of any rights usual to any probationer to challenge the revocation of his probation. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Carro, Asch, Lynch and Ellerin, JJ.
PEOPLES-SIDNEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with then Quarterly Report of Peoples-Sidney Financial Corporation
(the  "Corporation")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as
furnished  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date of this
Certification  (the  "Report"),  I, Douglas  Stewart,  the  President  and Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation, and, I, Debra A. Geuy, the Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the  Corporation,  certify,  pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Corporation.


                                  /s/ Douglas Stewart
                                  ----------------------------
                                  Douglas Stewart, President and Chief Executive
                                  Officer

                                  Date: November 14, 2005
                                        ----------------------


                                  /s/ Debra A. Geuy
                                  ----------------------------
                                  Debra A. Geuy, Chief Financial Officer and
                                  Treasurer

                                  Date: November 14, 2005
                                        ----------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             28.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER LEE SCHWENK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 104 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of January , 202 4

, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
ARTICLES OF MERGER

                                       OF

                             HOMESIDE HOLDINGS, INC.

                                      INTO

                             HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.

         Pursuant  to the  provisions  of Chapter  607,  Florida  Statutes,  the
parties hereto hereby adopt the following  Articles of Merger for the purpose of
merging them into one corporation:

     1.  HOMESIDE   HOLDINGS,   INC.,  a  Florida   corporation   (the  "Merging
Corporation"),  shall be merged with and into HOMESIDE LENDING,  INC., a Florida
corporation  (the  "Surviving  Corporation"),   which  shall  be  the  surviving
corporation in the merger.

     2. The merger shall become effective on the date on which these Articles of
Merger are filed with the Florida Department of State (the "Effective Date").

     3. The Articles of  Incorporation  of the Merging  Corporation as in effect
immediately   prior  to  the  Effective   Date  shall  become  the  Articles  of
Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation.

     4. The Plan of Merger,  a copy of which is attached  hereto and made a part
hereof, was adopted and approved by the directors of the Merging  Corporation on
February 15, 2000 and by the directors of the Surviving  Corporation on February
15, 2000.

     5. Pursuant to Section 607.1104,  Florida Statutes, no shareholder approval
was required for this merger.

     6. The name of the Surviving  Corporation after the Merger shall remain and
be HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,   the  Surviving   Corporation  and  the  Merging
Corporation  have  caused  these  Articles  of  Merger to be  executed  by their
respective officers as of February 15, 2000.

HOMESIDE HOLDINGS, INC.                         HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.


By:               /S/                           By:               /S/
   -------------------------------------           ------------------
         Name: Robert J. Jacobs                          Name: Robert J. Jacobs
         Its: Vice President                             Its: Vice President
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE:

REGINALD P GRIGSBY

DEBTOR

CASE NO. 10 B 00571

CHAPTER 13

JUDGE JACK B SCHMETTERER

NOTICE OF FINAL CURE PAYMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1(f), the Chapter 13 Trustee, TOM VAUGHN 

files this Notice of Final Cure Payment. The amount required to cure the default in the claim listed 

below has been paid in full.

Name of Creditor: NEIGHBORHOOD LENDING SERV

Final Cure Amount

Court

Claim #

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Amount

Paid

$2,090.77 $2,090.77 $2,090.77

Total Amount Paid by Trustee $2,090.77

Account

Number

0962 1436 FARWELL

Claim 

ID

3 7

Monthly Ongoing Mortgage Payment

Mortgage is Paid:

 Through the Chapter 13 Conduit X Direct by the Debtor

Within 21 days of the service of the Notice of Final Cure Payment, the creditor MUST file and serve a 

Statement as a supplement to the holder’s proof of claim on the Debtor, Debtor's Counsel and the 

Chapter 13 Trustee, pursuant to Fed.R.Bank.P.3002.1(g), indicating 1) whether it agrees that the Debtor 

has paid in full the amount required to cure the default on the claim; and 2) whether the Debtor is 

otherwise current on all payments consistent with 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(5). 

The statement shall itemize the required cure or post-petition amounts, if any, that the holder contends 

remain unpaid as of the date of the statement. The statement shall be filed as a supplement to the 

holder’s proof of claim and is not subject to Rule 3001(f). Failure to notify may result in sanctions.

Case 10-00571 Doc 44 Filed 01/23/15 Entered 01/23/15 11:03:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 10-00571-JBS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify under penalty of perjury that this office caused a copy of this notice to be delivered to the 

persons named above by U.S. mail at 55 E. MONROE STREET, SUITE 3850, CHICAGO, IL 60603 or 

by the methods indicated on this 23rd day of January, 2015.

Debtor:

REGINALD P GRIGSBY

1436 W FARWELL AVE # 3C

CHICAGO, IL 60626

Attorney:

DAVID M SIEGEL

790 CHADDICK DR

WHEELING, IL 60090

via Clerk's ECF noticing procedures

Creditor:

NEIGHBORHOOD LENDING SERV

% MB FINANCIAL BANK

6111 RIVER RD

ROSEMONT, IL 60018

Mortgage Creditor:

NORTHERN TRUST CO

% KROPIK PAPUGA & SHAW

120 S LASALLE ST #1500

CHICAGO, IL 60603

ELECTRONIC SERVICE - United States Trustee

Date: January 23, 2015

TOM VAUGHN

CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

55 E. MONROE STREET, SUITE 3850

CHICAGO, IL 60603

/s/ TOM VAUGHN

Case 10-00571 Doc 44 Filed 01/23/15 Entered 01/23/15 11:03:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### KING, Respondent, v. CHELSEA JUTE MILLS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 25, 1907.)

Action by Kate King against the Chelsea Jute Mills. L. Cohn, for appellant. J. J. Buckley, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIS FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         246,996
<SECURITIES>                                    13,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,336
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,611
<PP&E>                                          33,979
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 443,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,213
<BONDS>                                        250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   443,904
<SALES>                                         64,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,212
<CGS>                                              952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   239
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (333)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,735
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,068)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,068)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
<F2>AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATEMENT OF
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE."
</FN>


</TABLE>
** **

**Exhibit32**

**WrittenStatement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal EntertainmentGroup, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, tohis/her knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)                                  theForm 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2006, filed onthe date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)                                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Michael L. Campbell |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Michael L. Campbell     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | February 26, 2007       |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Amy E. Miles        |
|   | Amy E. Miles            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | February 26, 2007       |

 

----
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:145

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 2 of 20 PageID #:146

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 3 of 20 PageID #:147

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 4 of 20 PageID #:148

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 5 of 20 PageID #:149

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 6 of 20 PageID #:150

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 7 of 20 PageID #:151

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 8 of 20 PageID #:152

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 9 of 20 PageID #:153

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 10 of 20 PageID #:154

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 11 of 20 PageID #:155

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 12 of 20 PageID #:156

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 13 of 20 PageID #:157

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 14 of 20 PageID #:158

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 15 of 20 PageID #:159

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 16 of 20 PageID #:160

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 17 of 20 PageID #:161

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 18 of 20 PageID #:162

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 19 of 20 PageID #:163

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/10/04 Page 20 of 20 PageID #:164