alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          44,597
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                      870
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     70,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,899
<PP&E>                                          23,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,423)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,577
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,785
<SALES>                                         61,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,532
<CGS>                                         (42,925)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (23,626)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,643)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (94)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,941
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,214)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,727
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
From S-8 (Nos. 33-98920 and 33-308349) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Incentive
Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the related Prospectus of
Cardiometrics, Inc., with respect to the financial statements of
Cardiometrics, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1996.

                                        /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 27, 1997
EXHIBIT
31.2








CERTIFICATION




I, the Chief
Financial Officer of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the “registrant”), certify
that:




1.   
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;




2.   
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.   
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) disclosed in
this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.   
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




(b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:
      November 14, 2008
                      /s/ Peter A.
      HofmannName:
                      Peter A.
      HofmannTitle:
                      Senior
      Executive Vice President and
                        Chief
      Financial
Officer
# Official Journal L 141/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 141 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5714 May 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 141

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5714 May 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 establishing the framework for cooperation within the Single Supervisory Mechanism between the European Central Bank and national competent authorities and with national designated authorities (SSM Framework Regulation) (ECB/2014/17) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 469/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 on the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (ECB/1999/4) (ECB/2014/18) | 51 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 establishing the framework for cooperation within the Single Supervisory Mechanism between the European Central Bank and national competent authorities and with national designated authorities (SSM Framework Regulation) (ECB/2014/17)

(ECB/2014/17)

1

*

Regulation (EU) No 469/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 on the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (ECB/1999/4) (ECB/2014/18)

(ECB/2014/18)

51

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Subihanto HARDJOHUBOJO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70359.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 22, 2011.

Sharon A. Healey, Law Office of Sharon A. Healey, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Aric Allan Anderson, Trial, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*957Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Subihanto Hardjohubojo, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, and we review de novo the agency’s legal determinations. *Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review.

Hardjohubojo converted from Islam to Catholicism over 45 years ago and does not contend he suffered past persecution or that he was ever harmed in Indonesia on account of his religion. However, based on information he read online while visiting the United States, he now fears he will be persecuted in the future by Muslim extremists because of his religion. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of asylum because a claim based solely on general civil strife or widespread random violence is not sufficient. *See Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 1173, 1179 (9th Cir.2007) (en bane) (“a general, undifferentiated claim of [violence] does not render an alien eligible for asylum”). We reject Hardjohubojo’s request to remand in light of *Tampubolon v. Holder,*610 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir.2010), because he failed to argue to the agency, and does not argue to the court, that he experienced any harm on account of his religion other than some discrimination. Accordingly, Hardjohubo-jo’s asylum claim fails.

Because Hardjohubojo failed to meet the lower burden of proof for asylum, his claim for withholding of removal necessarily fails. *See Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Hardjohubojo failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Indonesia. *See Wakkary,*558 F.3d at 1067-68.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Wilcox Trucking, Inc. *v.*Mansour Builders, Inc.

Decided March 1, 1990

*Mary F. Haddon,*in support of the petition.

*Robert J. Reeve*and *Edward F. Scully,*in opposition.

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 420, is denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 43 

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 

adjournment of the House of Representatives. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. REID submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the 

Senate and an adjournment of the House of Representatives. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns 

3 on any day from Thursday, April 26, 2012, through Sun4 day, May 6, 2012, on a motion offered pursuant to this 

5 concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his des6 ignee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12 noon on 

7 Monday, May 7, 2012, or such other time on that day 

8 as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee 

9 in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of 

10 any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SCON 43 ATS 

1 resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the 

2 House adjourns on any legislative day through Friday, 

3 May 4, 2012, on a motion offered pursuant to this concur4 rent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 

5 stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, May 7, 2012, 

6 or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 

7 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 

8 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the 

9 Speaker of the House, or their respective designees, acting 

10 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

11 Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify 

12 the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to re13 assemble at such place and time as they may designate 

14 if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6613

TERRY BRUCE BALDWIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DEAN WALKER; MICHAEL F. EASLEY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-99-50-1-MU)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Bruce Baldwin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order denying reconsideration

is marked as “filed” on May 4, 1999, the district court’s records

show that it was entered on the docket sheet on May 5, 1999. It is

the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R.

Civ. P. 58 and 79(a); Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th

Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Bruce Baldwin appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Baldwin v. Walker, No. CA-99-50-1-MU

(W.D.N.C. Mar. 31 & May 5, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 59/9 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 59 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 489 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 59

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 489 March 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 059/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 059/2 | Final report of the hearing officer in case COMP/ M.3333 — SONY/BMG (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of hearing officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21) (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 059/3 | Opinion of the Advisory Committee on concentrations given at its 127th meeting on 9 July 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in case COMP/M.3333 — SONY/BMG (1) | 4 |
| 2005/C 059/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3721 — Stora Enso/Scaldia/PdF) (1) | 5 |
| 2005/C 059/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3694 — Hochtief/ABB/JV) (1) | 6 |
| 2005/C 059/6 | List of natural mineral waters recognised by Member States (1) | 7 |
| 2005/C 059/7 | Publication of an application for registration pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin | 33 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 059/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 059/2

Final report of the hearing officer in case COMP/ M.3333 — SONY/BMG (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of hearing officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21) (1)

2

2005/C 059/3

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on concentrations given at its 127th meeting on 9 July 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in case COMP/M.3333 — SONY/BMG (1)

4

2005/C 059/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3721 — Stora Enso/Scaldia/PdF) (1)

5

2005/C 059/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3694 — Hochtief/ABB/JV) (1)

6

2005/C 059/6

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Member States (1)

7

2005/C 059/7

Publication of an application for registration pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin

33

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet as of September 30, 1999 and the Statement of Operations for the six
months ended September 30, 1999,included on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly
Period ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              24
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   415
<PP&E>                                               1
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              544
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                       (116)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       445
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     23
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (23)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.001)


</TABLE>
#### LINGENFELTER, Respondent, v. HALLADAY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 20, 1907.)

Action by Thankful Z. Lingenf el ter against Joel A. Halladay and others.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street Properties Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, John G. Demeritt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  May 4, 2010
/s/ John G. Demeritt

John G. Demeritt

Chief Financial Officer
‘Minate Order Form (06/97)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Jud Sitting Judge if Oth
or Magistrate Judge Amy J. St. Eve than Assigned Judge
CASE NUMBER 03 CR 779 - 4 and 5 DATE 8/15/2003
CASE USA vs. James Waliwin and George Stimac
TITLE

[ln the following box (a) indicate the party filing the motion, e.g., plaintiff, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the nature

of the motion being presented.]

MOTION:

DOCKET ENTRY:

qd) Oo Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]}

(2) oO Brief in support of motion due

(3) oO Answer briefto motion due___. Reply to answer briefdue___.

4 oO Ruling/Hearingon____setfor__——at__—

(5) o Status hearing[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for]on __—setfor____at

(6) oO Pretrial conference{held/continued to] [set for/re-set for]on__——ssetfor_ se at__

7) o Trial[set for/re-set for]on at

(8) Qo [Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continuedto__at

o a This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agreement/pursuant to]
OOFRCP4(m) CLocal Rule 41.1 CFRCP41(a)(i) OO FRCP41(a)(2).

ao) [Other docket entry] Arraignment and plea is reset from 9:00 8/19/03 to 2:30 8/19/03.

Nae
ay a [For further detail see order (on reverse side of/attached to) the original minute order.]

No notices required, advised in open court.

No notices required.
umber of notices

Notices mailed by judge’s staff.

Notified counsel by telephone. AU G 1 8 2003

wv | Docketing to mail notices.
Mail AO 450 form. L8N09 LOLI sn
Copy to judge/magistrate judge. yuaT3
i129 Hd SI on eo
vA courtroom
ms dens DHL IHIOG Nos OFA
Date/témeltleived in
central Clerk's Office sailing deputy ital,