alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory: Mandan, ND
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Employment
                        Work With Us
                                    ARS Vacancies at USDAJOBS
                    Local News
                        INTEGRATOR
                                    Bottom Line Ag SummitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Mandan, North Dakota Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- ARS News Articles

Jonathan J Halvorson
                     

                     Research Soil Scientist


                     Phone: (701) 667-3094
                     
                     

                     Fax: (701) 667-3054
                     

                     1701 10TH AVE. SW                                 
                     PO BOX 459                                        
                     

                     MANDAN                        , ND 58554


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0369

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

MALCOLM JOSEPH NEWROBE, SR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 30, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 24 2020

06/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0369
Exhibit 99.1

NEWS RELEASE

For further information
contact:



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Kerry J. Chauvin        |  | Robin A. Seibert       
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer
|985.872.2100            |  | 985.872.2100           

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

APRIL 12, 2010

GULF ISLAND FABRICATION, INC.

TO ANNOUNCE EARNINGS RESULTS

AND QUARTERLY CONFERENCE CALL

Houma, LA  (BUSINESS WIRE)  April 12, 2010  Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. (NASDAQ: GIFI), will announce 2010 first quarter
earnings after the market close on Wednesday, April 21, 2010.

The management of Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. will hold a conference
call on Thursday, April 22, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time (10:00 a.m. Eastern Time) to discuss the Companys financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

The call is accessible by webcast through CCBN and by dialing the following:



|         |  |                   
|-------- |  | ------------------
|Dial In: |  | 1.888.211.4435    
|         | 
|Webcast: |  | www.gulfisland.com

A digital rebroadcast of the call
is available two hours after the call and ending May 6, 2010 by dialing:



|                 |  |               
|---------------- |  | --------------
|Phone Number:    |  | 1.888.203.1112
|                 | 
|Replay Passcode: |  | 1200664       

Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc., based in Houma,
Louisiana, is a leading fabricator of offshore drilling and production platforms, hull and/or deck sections of floating production platforms and other specialized structures used in the development and production of offshore oil and gas reserves.
These structures include jackets and deck sections of fixed production platforms; hull and/or deck sections of floating production platforms (such as tension leg platforms (TLPs)), SPARs, FPSOs, piles, wellhead protectors,
subsea templates and various production, compressor and utility modules, offshore living quarters, tanks and barges. The Company also provides offshore interconnect pipe hook-up, inshore marine construction, manufacture and repair of pressure
vessels, heavy lifts such as ship integration and TLP module integration, loading and offloading of jack-up drilling rigs, semi-submersible drilling rigs, TLPs, SPARs, or other similar cargo, onshore and offshore scaffolding, piping insulation
services, and steel warehousing and sales.
#### Eleanor Fox, Respondent, v Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 888]—

In an action to recover damages for breach of an insurance contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.), dated February 18, 2011, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant issued a homeowners policy of insurance to the plaintiff. The plaintiff sustained a water loss on October 25, 2005. On or about May 15, 2009, the plaintiff commenced this action to recover amounts allegedly due under the policy. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that the action was time-barred based on a two-year limitations provision set forth in the policy.

By citing the insurance policy’s two-year limitations period, the defendant satisfied its burden of producing evidence which, if uncontroverted, was sufficient to warrant judgment in its favor as a matter of law *(see Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins.*
      *1275
      *Co.,*70 NY2d 966 [1988]). In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact as to whether the defendant, by-engaging in conduct which allegedly lulled the plaintiff into not pursuing her rights under the insurance contract upon the belief that the defendant would satisfy her claim, waived its right to assert, or was estopped from asserting, the period of limitations as a defense *(see Greenpoint Bank v Security Mut. Ins. Co.,*247 AD2d 583 [1998]; *Burke v Nationwide Ins. Co.,*108 AD2d 1098 [1985]; *cf. Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co.,*70 NY2d 966 [1988]; *McGivney v Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,*305 AD2d 559 [2003]; *Minichello v Northern Assur. Co. of Am.,*304 AD2d 731 [2003]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 30438(U).]
(121 App. Div. 692.)

#### PEOPLE v. KIPP.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 25, 1907.)

Larceny—Evidence—Sufficiency.

Evidence *held*to sustain conviction.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 32, Larceny, §§ 149-178.]

Appeal from Court of General Sessions, New York County.

Charles Kipp and another were convicted of petit larceny, and Charles Kipp appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before PATTERSON, P. J., and INGRAHAM, LAUGH-LIN, CEARKE, and HOUGHTON, JJ.

Henry Hardwicke, for appellant.

Robert S. Johnstone, Deputy Asst. Dist. Atty., for respondent.

INGRAHAM, J.

The defendants Kipp and Eeingold were tried together for petit larceny. The articles stolen were shoes, of the value of $23, that the owner had intrusted to a boy in its employ to deliver to customers. This boy testified that while in possession of the shoes, at the corner of Grand and Allen streets, in the city of New York, the defendant Eeingold met the boy and asked him to go on an errand; that the boy left the bundle of shoes with another boy that was with him, and that when he came,back from the errand the bundle of shoes was gone; that in this bundle there were 10 pairs of shoes, the property of William G. Smith & Co. The defendant Kipp was not present at the time. A police officer testified that he arrested the two defendants in a furnished room at 229 Chrystie street; that the two defendants had two pairs of the shoes in their possession; that he asked Eeingold, in the presence of the defendant, where he got them, and Eeingold said that Kipp told him he could get a cheap pair of shoes,- and he went to Kipp’s house to get them; that Kipp said that Eeingold’s statement was true.

Upon this evidence the court found both of the defendants guilty, and I think the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. Kipp and Eeingold together were in possession of stolen goods, and, when *308Fein gold said that Kipp told Feingold that he could get a cheap pair of shoes, went to the house in which they were arrested for that purpose, Kipp said that that was true. From this the court was justified in finding that Kipp was in possession of the shoes and was a participant in the larceny. The case is ruled by the cases of Knickerbocker v. People, 43 N. Y. 177, and People v. Wilson, 7 App. Div. 326, 40 N. Y. Supp. 107, affirmed in 151 N. Y. 403, 45 N. E. 862.

The judgment should therefore be affirmed. All concur.
Exhibit 32.2

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

 

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the foregoing Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

 

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.

 
| Date: April 30,   2018 | By:    |   /s/ Brenda   J.   Battey                            |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Brenda J. Battey                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                        |   | Broadway Financial   Corporation                                                                                                                                                                       |

 

----
### UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE P ANEL FOR TH E FIRST C IRCUIT

_______________________________ BAP NO. M W 99-110

_______________________________ In r e: ROB ERT J. BRUNO,

Debtor.

_______________________________ SUSAN K. WALTON, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE,

Plaintiff/Appellant,
V. ROBERT J. B RUNO, INDI VIDUALLY AND AS T RUSTEE OF KAB REALTY TRUST AND CARLA M. BRUNO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF KAB REALTY TRUST,

Defendants/Appellees.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District

of Massachusetts, Western Divisi on [Hon. James F. Queenan, Jr., U.S. Bankruptcy Judge]

______________________________

Before GOOD MAN , HAINES a nd DEAS Y, U.S. Bankruptcy Ju dges.

______________________________
Jeffrey D. G anz and R iemer & B raunstein, LL P for App ellant. Robert V. Eberle for Appellee.

______________________________

March 31, 2000

______________________________1 Although counsel for both the Appellant and the Appellee

appeared at the hearing on the Appellant’s appeal, counsel for the Appellee was precluded from presenting argument given that he failed to file a brief. PER CURIAM. On December 1, 1999, the Bankruptcy Court entered a judgment wherein it found the following: (1) KAB Realty Trust held only record title to the property located at 6 Wildflower Lane, Weston, Massachusetts (the “Property”) and that beneficial ownership of the Property was held by the Debtor and his wife, Carla M. Bruno; and (2) the Debtor and his wife held such beneficial ownership as tenants by the entirety. See Judgment dated December 1, 1999. The Chapter 7 Trustee appeals only the second ruling contained in the Bankruptcy Court’s judgment; i.e., that the Debtor and his wife owned the Property as tenants by the entirety. 1 A review of the record in this proceeding indicates that little substantive evidence was presented by the parties concerning the ownership character of the Debtor and his wife’s interest in the Property. That issue does not appear to have been addressed by the parties at trial from either a factual or legal perspective. In addition, the Bankruptcy Court did not articulate its reasons for concluding that the Debtor and his wife owned the Property as tenants by the entirety. See, e.g., Transcript of Trial at 156-58. Therefore, there is nothing in the record upon which the Panel may conduct a reasoned review.2 Because the Chapter 7 Trustee does not question the

Bankruptcy Court’s ruling that the Debtor and his wife, as opposed to KAB Realty Trust, held beneficial ownership of the Property, this Panel’s decision has no effect on that ruling. Accordingly, the Bankruptcy Court’s second ruling that the Debtor and his wife held the property as tenants by the entirety should be reconsidered against the backdrop of a full record concerning the issue. 2 The Bankruptcy Court’s ruling that the Debtor and his wife held the property as tenants by the entirety is VACATED and REMANDED to the Bankruptcy Court for further proceedings consistent with our decision.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Crops Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ScientistsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin Vegetable Crops Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications in ARIS

Shawn  Steffan
                     

                     Research Entomologist


                     Phone: (608) 890-1281
                     
                     

                     Fax: (608) 262-3322
                     

                     UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN                           
                     1575 LINDEN DR                                    
                     

                     MADISON                       , WI 53706


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ David J. Wagner    
|                     |  | Name:  |  | David J. Wagner        
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### HEWITT, Respondent, v. BAUMAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate' Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Charles W. Hewitt against Simon Bauman.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the plaintiff cannot maintain an action on a contract which he was prohibited by law from making.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7532

EUGENE A. STAUCH, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina; MICHAEL W. MOORE, Commissioner of Corrections; GERALDINE P. MIRO; LARRY C. BATSON, General Counsel for SCDC; LAVERNE COHEN, Classification Coordinator ACI; CYNTHIA SANDERS, Classification Worker; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Rock Hill. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-418-0-06BD) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 22, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene A. Stauch, III, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Macon Flynn, SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert E. Peterson, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on October 7, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on October 8, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Eugene Stauch appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Stauch’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stauch v. Condon , No. CA-98-418-0-06BD (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED