alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 22, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF A .M.P. , A Child NO. 14

- 11

- 00164

- CV

____________________
This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee HENRY KOHL , signed December 13, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We hav e inspected the record and find err or in the judgment . We therefore order that the portions of the judgment relating to the petition to modify child support and the counter

- petition to modify child support a re REVERSED and ordered severed and REMANDED for proceeding s in accordance with this court’ s opinion. Further, we order the remainder of the judgment AFFIRMED , including the order denying recovery on app ellant LIANE POELL’S fraudulent

- inducement claim and the order s regarding possession of and access to A.M.P. We order appellee HENRY KOHL to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 351 

Recognizing the accomplishments and commemorating the numerous achievements and contributions of the Alaska Native people over the past 

40 years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17, 2011 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. BEGICH) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the accomplishments and commemorating the 

numerous achievements and contributions of the Alaska 

Native people over the past 40 years. 

Whereas on December 18, 1971, Public Law 92–203 (43 

U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) was enacted to settle long-standing 

issues of Alaska Native aboriginal land claims; 

Whereas the pioneering work of Alaska Native leaders has 

created a lasting legacy of professional and personal success; 

Whereas Alaska Native people have prospered from their own 

initiative and innovative approaches to fostering economic 

development through self-determination; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 351 ATS 

Whereas Alaska Natives have produced a significant number 

of educated Alaska Natives who now serve in positions of 

leadership in the State of Alaska and beyond; 

Whereas Alaska Native people have risen to the challenge of 

independently and productively managing their aboriginal 

land, which has fostered sustainable businesses and created employment opportunities for the people of the 

United States, both across the country and globally; 

Whereas Alaska Native people continue to serve in positions 

of leadership in the State of Alaska and beyond; 

Whereas the dedication and enthusiasm of the next generation of Alaska Native leaders honors the previous generation of Alaska Native leaders who worked diligently to 

achieve the most significant Native land settlement in the 

history of the United States; 

Whereas the next generation of Alaska Native people will 

continue to make positive changes in the world around 

them through acquired leadership skills, cultural advocacy, and community engagement; 

Whereas the people of the United States have reason to commemorate the economic and political contributions of 

Alaska Native people; and 

Whereas the people of the United States have reason to 

honor the tremendous educational, social, political, economic, and cultural achievements of the Alaska Native 

people over the past 40 years: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes December 18, 2011, as the 40th 

3 anniversary of the original enactment of the Alaska 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 351 ATS 

1 Native Claims Settlement Act (Public Law 92–203; 

2 43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.); 

3 (2) recognizes the significant educational, eco4 nomic, political, and cultural contributions of the 

5 Alaska Native people over the past 40 years; and 

6 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to participate in activities that show support for the 

8 success of the Native people and tribes of the State 

9 of Alaska. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Guasp, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 112] —

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), entered on or about July 27, 2010, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed 15 points under the risk factor for drug or alcohol abuse. This was established by the results of a screening test for alcoholism and defendant’s admissions to corrections officials regarding his drug use *(see e.g. People v Johnson,*77 AD3d 548 [2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 705 [2011]).

In any event, regardless of whether defendant’s correct point score was 55, as he claims, or 70, as the court found, the record supports the court’s discretionary upward departure to level two. The court properly determined that although defendant received points relating to the facts of the underlying sex crime, the risk assessment instrument failed to adequately take into account the crime’s unusual brutality and heinous quality *(see e.g. People v Miller,*48 AD3d 774 [2008], *lv denied*10 NY3d 711 [2008]; *People v Sanford,*47 AD3d 454 [2008], *lv denied*10 NY3d 707 [2008]). These aggravating factors outweighed the mitigating factors cited by defendant. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Catterson, Moskowitz, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANIE'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         167,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,610,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,921,645
<BONDS>                                         47,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,347
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,362,387)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,610,380
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  475,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (475,322)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (475,322)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (475,322)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.38



Summary of Executive Compensation



Salaries:



The named executive officers of IDX Systems Corporation (the Company), as defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K (each, a Named
Executive), are paid the following in annual salary:



|                |  |         
|--------------- |  | --------
|James H. Crook  |  | $518,301
|Thomas W. Butts |  | $353,261
|John A. Kane    |  | $279,883
|Robert F. Galin |  | $241,749
|Walt Marti      |  | $196,250



Bonuses:



Each Named Executive will be eligible for a bonus in respect of fiscal year
2005 based on the actual earnings per share of the Company as compared to a targeted earnings per share of the Company. The percentage of the Named Executives targeted bonus for which he or she will be eligible is determined on a sliding
scale, such that for every percentage point by which the actual earnings per share differs from the targeted earnings per share, the percentage of target bonus decreases or increases by 7% (however, if the actual earnings per share is less than 90%
of the targeted earnings per share, the Named Executive is not eligible for any bonus, and the Named Executive is also not eligible for amounts in excess of 170% of his or her targeted bonus.



For Named Executives responsible for one of the Companys four operating
units, the bonus is determined based 50% on the formula described above and 50% on the attainment of specified revenue, DSO and cumulative quarterly profitability goals.



Other:



Each Named Executive may also be granted from time to time stock options, restricted stock or other awards pursuant to the Companys stock incentive
plans.



The foregoing description, in the case of Messrs. Crook
and Butts, is subject to their employment, non-competition and non-disclosure agreements, which have been filed as exhibits to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. The foregoing description is also subject to executive retention
agreements, a form of which has been filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4221 — ACP/MAN Roland)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 144/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005 p. 32.

----
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
In connection with the Annual Report of Apiva Ventures Ltd., a British Columbia
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Dean, Chief Executive Officer of the Company do hereby certify,
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.
 By:         _/s/ Christopher Dean

 Name:    Christopher Dean
 Title:      Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer
 Date:      June 30, 2006
# Official Journal C 110A/16 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 110A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5016 May 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 110A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5016 May 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 110A/01 | NOTICE TO READERS | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2007/C 110A/01

NOTICE TO READERS

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2007/C 110A/02 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/48/06 — Heads of unit (AD 9) of Czech citizenship | 3 |
| 2007/C 110A/03 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/49/06 — Heads of unit (AD 9) of Lithuanian citizenship | 4 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2007/C 110A/02

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/48/06 — Heads of unit (AD 9) of Czech citizenship

3

2007/C 110A/03

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/49/06 — Heads of unit (AD 9) of Lithuanian citizenship

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### DE FEO, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 25, 1907.)

Action by Mary G. De Feo against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. B. H. Ames, for appellant. A. Ofner, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to $2,500 and costs, in which event judgment, as so modified, and order, affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS**In connection with the Quarterly Report of StarTek, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned individual, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.     Date: May 6, 2008 /s/ A. LAURENCE JONES   A. Laurence Jones   President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: May 6, 2008 /s/ DAVID G. DURHAM   David G. Durham   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
27
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Polaris Alpha, LLC ) ASBCA No. 63315

)

Under Contract No. FA8750

- 19

- D

- 0004 et al. )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Steven M. Masiello, Esq.

Eric P. Roberson, Esq.

Dentons US LLP

Denver, CO

Gale R. Monahan, Esq.

Dentons US LLP

Dallas, TX

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Adrianne L. Goins, Esq.

Matthew D. Bordelon, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

Defense Contract Management Agency

Chantilly, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: March 2 6 , 2024

MARK A. MELNICK

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63315

, Appeal of Polaris

Alpha, LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: March 26, 2024

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 235 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 235

       Designating 2011 as ``The Year of the Family Caregiver''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2011

 Ms. Mikulski (for herself, Mr. Sanders, and Ms. Snowe) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating 2011 as ``The Year of the Family Caregiver''.

Whereas there are more than 65,000,000 people in the United States serving as 
        family caregivers for a family member or friend with a disability, 
        chronic illness, or the frailties associated with old age;
Whereas family caregivers in the United States are family, friends, partners, 
        and neighbors who choose to provide care out of feelings of love or a 
        sense of duty;
Whereas family caregivers deal with significant medical and psycho-social issues 
        that require complex care management and coordination with numerous 
        medical providers;
Whereas family caregivers provide 80 percent of all long-term care services in 
        the United States;
Whereas despite the physical, psychological, and financial hardship that 
        caregivers endure, these individuals provide high-quality services that 
        bring countless benefits to their care recipients and to society; and
Whereas the people of the United States should acknowledge the vital role of 
        family caregivers, enable such caregivers to live healthier, less 
        stressful lives, and enhance the ability of family caregivers to improve 
        the health and well-being of those that they care for: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the year 2011 as the 11-year anniversary of 
        the National Family Caregiver Support Program;
            (2) applauds the Administration on Aging and national and 
        community based organizations that support family caregivers;
            (3) applauds the family, friends, partners, and neighbors 
        who provide long-term care services; and
            (4) designates 2011 as ``The Year of the Family 
        Caregiver''.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 1:02-cr-00282 Document #: 48 Filed: 03/06/07 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:86
Case: 1:02-cr-00282 Document #: 48 Filed: 03/06/07 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:87
Case: 1:02-cr-00282 Document #: 48 Filed: 03/06/07 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:88
Case: 1:02-cr-00282 Document #: 48 Filed: 03/06/07 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:89
Case: 1:02-cr-00282 Document #: 48 Filed: 03/06/07 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:90
Case: 1:02-cr-00282 Document #: 48 Filed: 03/06/07 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:91
# C_2019155EN.01005201.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/52

---

Action brought on 11 March 2019 — ZU v EEAS

(Case T-154/19)

(2019/C 155/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of the EEAS of 30 November 2018, rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 27 July 2018, insofar as it implicitly rejects his statement of expenses of 26 February 2018; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of the EEAS of 30 November 2018, rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 27 July 2018, insofar as it implicitly rejects his statement of expenses of 26 February 2018;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging failure to comply with applicable provisions of the Staff Regulations (inter alia, Articles 12a, 56 and 71 thereof) and infringement of Articles 31(1) and (2), 41(1) and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, violation of the ‘reasonable time’ principle, the principle of good administration and the principle of sound financial management (waste of EU resources), misuse of powers and concealing of evidence, breach of the rules governing the reimbursement of travel expenses, failure to comply with the principle of proportionality, manifest error of assessment, violation of the duty of care, and omission of prima facie elements identified in the applicant’s complaint based on Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations.

---
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1039

To designate a commercial zone within which the transportation of certain

passengers or property in commerce is exempt from certain provisions

of chapter 135, of title 49, United States Code.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 21, 1997

Mr. DOMENICI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To designate a commercial zone within which the transportation of certain passengers or property in commerce

is exempt from certain provisions of chapter 135, of

title 49, United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NEW MEXICO COMMERCIAL

4 ZONE.

5 (a) COMMERCIAL ZONE DEFINED.—The term ‘‘com6 mercial zone’’ means a zone containing lands adjacent to,

7 and commercially a part of, 1 or more municipalities with
2

•S 1039 IS

1 respect to which the exception described in section

2 13506(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, applies.

3 (b) DESIGNATION OF ZONE.—

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—The area described in para5 graph (2) is designated as a commercial zone, to be

6 known as the ‘‘New Mexico Commercial Zone’’.

7 (2) DESCRIPTION OF AREA.—

8 (A) IN GENERAL.—The area described in

9 this paragraph is the area extending—

10 (i) from the western most point of the

11 commercial zone for El Paso, Texas, (as so

12 designated before the date of enactment of

13 this Act) north along Interstate 10 to Las

14 Cruces, New Mexico;

15 (ii) west from Las Cruces, New Mex16 ico, along Interstate 10 to Deming, New

17 Mexico;

18 (iii) south from Deming, New Mexico,

19 along highway 11 to the Columbus Port of

20 Entry on the border between New Mexico

21 and the Republic of Mexico; and

22 (iv) east from the Columbus Port of

23 Entry to the southwestern most point of

24 the commercial zone described in clause

25 (i).
3

•S 1039 IS

1 (B) MAP.—The Secretary of Transpor2 tation shall prepare and make available for pub3 lic inspection a map depicting the commercial

4 zone established under this section.

5 (c) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Nothing in this Act shall

6 affect any action commenced, or pending before the Sec7 retary of Transportation or Surface Transportation Board

8 before the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
# C_2021329EN.01002002.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings v EUIPO (Combination of sounds on opening a can of soft drink)

(Case T-668/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a combination of sounds on opening a can of soft drink - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2021/C 329/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co. KG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: S. Abrar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, D. Hanf and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2019 (Case R 530/2019-2), concerning an application for registration of a combination of sounds on opening a can of soft drink as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs incurred before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs incurred before the General Court;

| 3. | Orders Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs incurred before the General Court and the expenses necessarily incurred for the purpose of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs incurred before the General Court and the expenses necessarily incurred for the purpose of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.

---