alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 1 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 2 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 3 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 4 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 5 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 6 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 7 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 8 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 9 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 10 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 11 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 12 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 13 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 14 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 15 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 16 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 17 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 18 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 19 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 20 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 21 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 22 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 23 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 24 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 25 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 26 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 27 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 28 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 29 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 30 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 31 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 32 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 33 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 34 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 35 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 36 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 37 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 38 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 39 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 40 of 41
Case 1:00-cv-08062 Document 70 Filed 12/19/03 Page 41 of 41
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: 

Motorola Securities Litigation

 

Case No 03 C 00287

Judge Pallmeyer

NOTICE OF FILING

TO: All Counsel of Record

Please take notice that on July 31, 2012, the following document(s) were filed with the 

Clerk of the United States District Court. 

Request for Charitable Designation of LAF (“Legal Assistance Foundation”) (relates to 

docket entry 586, Motion to Approve Final Accounting and Make Final Disbursement). 

/s/ David S. Yen 

David S. Yen

Diana C. White

Executive Director

LAF

120 S. LaSalle St, Suite 900 

Chicago, IL 60603-3425

Phone: 312/347-8369

Email: dwhite@lafchicago.org

David S. Yen

On behalf of LAF 

LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION 

120 S. LaSalle St, Suite 900 

Chicago, IL 60603-3425

Phone: 312/347-8372 

Email dyen@lafchicago.org

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I filed the foregoing Notice and the Motion or Documents referred to 

therein, with the Clerk of the United States District Court using the Court’s CM/ECF system, 

which shall electronically serve notice of this filing on all counsel of record.

 /s/ David S. Yen 

 David S. Yen

Case: 1:03-cv-00287 Document #: 590-1 Filed: 07/31/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:11367
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50944

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONEL LOPEZ-MERCADO, also known as Leonel

L. Mercado, also known as Eder Lopez-Mercado,

also known as Jesus Lopez-Valovinos, also known

as Ivan Lopez-Mercado,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-03-CR-53-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Leonel Lopez-Mercado appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Lopez-Mercado contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element
No. 03-50944

-2-

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Lopez-Mercado maintains that he

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Lopez-Mercado acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I,
        the
        undersigned James Roundtree, Chief Financial Officer of FIRSTPLUS Financial
        Group, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 1.  The
        Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31,
        2006
        (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: April 4, 2007
                /s/
                    James
                    Roundtree
                    James
                      Roundtree
                    Chief
                      Financial Officer
                    Principal
                      Accounting Officer
Case: 1:01-cv-02183 Document #: 28 Filed: 06/26/01 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:88
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:106
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 2 of 18 PageID #:107
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 3 of 18 PageID #:108
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 4 of 18 PageID #:109
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 5 of 18 PageID #:110
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 6 of 18 PageID #:111
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 7 of 18 PageID #:112
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 8 of 18 PageID #:113
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 9 of 18 PageID #:114
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 10 of 18 PageID #:115
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 11 of 18 PageID #:116
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 12 of 18 PageID #:117
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 13 of 18 PageID #:118
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 14 of 18 PageID #:119
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 15 of 18 PageID #:120
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 16 of 18 PageID #:121
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 17 of 18 PageID #:122
Case: 1:02-cv-00097 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/19/02 Page 18 of 18 PageID #:123
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,200
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,605
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     21,662
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          15,476
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            14,918
<LOANS>                                        105,756
<ALLOWANCE>                                        985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,399
<DEPOSITS>                                     137,487
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,269
<LONG-TERM>                                        775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,160
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 155,399
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,335
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  551
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    30
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,916
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,387
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,529
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    548
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         548
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       405
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.48
<LOANS-NON>                                         84
<LOANS-PAST>                                       305
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   938
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       76
<RECOVERIES>                                        33
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  985
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               985
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            416


</TABLE>
#### Mary C. Petrino, Respondent, v Evelyn Amarga et al., Appellants.

—Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 29, 1985, affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Bambrick in his memorandum decision dated March 12, 1985. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Environmental Microbial & Food Safety Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About Us
                        Mission, Facilities, and Expertise
                                    Five Appropriated Projects
                                    Research Staff (by project group)Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Environmental Microbial & Food Safety Laboratory People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Scientists

Yaguang  Luo

(Sunny)
                     

                     Research Food Technologist
                     


                     ARS News Articles
                        item
                                             High-Tech Packaging Keeps Cut Produce Freshitem
                                             Scientists Test Method for Sanitizing Leafy Produce


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 21, 2014

NO. 03-13-00451-CV

Andrea R. Biller, Appellant

v.

NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 1, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 2, LLC; 

NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 3, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 4, LLC; 

NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 5, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 7, LLC; 

NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 10, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 11, LLC; 

NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 12, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 13, LLC; 

NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 17, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 18, LLC; 

NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 19, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 20, LLC; 

NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 21, LLC; NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 22, LLC; 

NNN 1 & 2 Met Center 23, LLC; and Lexington Insurance Company, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on June 13, 2013. 

Andrea R. Biller has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the 

Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and 

dismisses the appeal. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this 

Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 32.1



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Richard S. Gilbert, Chief Executive
Officer of Copper Mountain Networks, Inc. (the Company), and Michael O. Staiger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have
set their hands hereto as of the 20th day of April, 2004.



/s/

Richard S. GilbertRichard S. Gilbert Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




/s/

Michael O. StaigerMichael O. Staiger Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,732
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     76,670
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,901
<PP&E>                                          22,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,471
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,870
<SALES>                                         63,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,884
<CGS>                                           49,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,012
<INCOME-TAX>                                       424
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                588
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       588
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Order filed July 18, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00560-CV

____________

ROWAN & SIBLINGS, INC. AND MAHER HUSSEINI AKA MAHER 

KHALIL HUSSEINI, Appellants

V.

TARA ENERGY, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1017116

ORDER

According to information provided to this court, appellants’ notice of appeal 

appears to be untimely. Our records reflect that the trial court’s judgment was 

signed April 29, 2013. Our information reflects that appellants did not file a timely 

post-judgment motion. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due May 29, 2013, but 

it was not filed until June 24, 2013.
The clerk’s record has not been filed in this appeal. The County Clerk has 

informed this court that appellant did not pay for preparation of the clerk’s record. 

In response to notices from this court, appellant informed this court that he cannot 

afford to pay for the record.

To determine our jurisdiction over this appeal, and if jurisdiction exists, 

whether appellant is entitled to proceed without the advance payment of costs, we 

issue the following order for a partial clerk’s record.

We order the Harris County Clerk to file a partial clerk’s record with the 

clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order. In order that this court 

may ascertain its jurisdiction over the appeal, the partial clerk’s record shall 

contain (1) the judgment being appealed; (2) any motion for new trial, other postjudgment motion, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (3) the 

notice of appeal. In addition, the partial clerk’s record shall contain: (4)

appellant’s affidavit of indigence; (5) the contest(s) to the affidavit of indigence, if 

any; (6) the trial court’s order ruling on any contest; (7) any other documents 

pertaining to the claim of indigence and the contests thereto. 

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1036 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1036

 To amend section 435(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
         with respect to the definition of an eligible lender.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 1997

  Mr. Allard (for himself and Mr. Campbell) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and 
                            Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 435(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
         with respect to the definition of an eligible lender.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act maybe cited as the ``Kid's Bark Act.''

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ELIGIBLE LENDER.

    Section 435(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1085(d)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended--
            (1) in subclause (I), by striking ``or'' after ``1992,''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting ``, 
        or (III) it is a bank that is a wholly owned subsidiary of a 
        nonprofit foundation, the foundation is described in section 
        501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from 
        taxation under section 501(a) of such Code, and the bank makes 
        loans under this part only to undergraduate students who are 
        age 22 or younger and has a portfolio of such loans that is not 
        more than $10,000,000;''.
                                 <all>
```