alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center: Maricopa, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Pest Management and Biocontrol Unit
                                    Plant Physiology and Genetics Unit
                                    Water Management and Conservation Unit
                                    Western Regional Biomass Research Center
                    About UsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Maricopa, Arizona U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center Docs





- Database Information

Softwareheadline bar  **** **RVSP** is a software package that enables users to validate multiple arthropod sampling plans through resampling of actual independent data sets.  Plans include Kuno's and Green's numerical sequential sampling plans, Wald's sequential probability ratio test for binomial sampling plans and Fixed-sample-size binomial sampling. **WinSRFR** is an integrated hydraulic analyses application for surface irrigation systems that combines a simulation engine with tools for irrigation system evaluation, design, and operational analysis. Intended users are irrigation specialists, university extension agents and researchers, consultants, and farmers with moderate to advanced knowledge of surface irrigation hydraulics.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-866]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Catalent Pharma 
Solutions, LLC.

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC. has applied to be registered 
as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before August 26, 2021. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before August 26, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
request for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this 
is notice that on June 2, 2021, Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC., 3031 
Red Lion Road, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19114, applied to be 
registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of 
controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid...............    2010  I
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide..............    7315  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the above controlled substances as 
finished dosage unit products for clinical trials, research, and 
analytical activities. No other activity for these drug codes is 
authorized for this registration.
    Approval of permit applications will occur only when the 
registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized 
under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import 
of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished 
dosage forms for commercial sale.

Brian S. Besser,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-15919 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6827

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES DARREN TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00177-RLV; 3:94-cr-00040-RLV-4)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 25, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Darren Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James Darren Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s

order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000);

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

(2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong

and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is

likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Taylor has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Taylor’s notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340

F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to

file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims
- 3 -

based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the

movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255

(2000). Taylor’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria.

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255

motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 279/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 279 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4917 November 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 279

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4917 November 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 279/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 279/2 | Agreement on Workers Health Protection through the Good Handling and Use of Crystalline Silica and Products containing it | 2 |
| 2006/C 279/3 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 9 |
| 2006/C 279/4 | Commission communication concerning the procedure laid down by Article 1, para 4 of Council Directive 96/67/EC | 13 |
| 2006/C 279/5 | Notice inviting applications for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block Q7 of the Dutch continental shelf. | 16 |
| 2006/C 279/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4442 — Carphone Warehouse /AOL UK) (1) | 17 |
| 2006/C 279/7 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4440 — GE/DISKO/ASL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 18 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 279/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 279/2

Agreement on Workers Health Protection through the Good Handling and Use of Crystalline Silica and Products containing it

2

2006/C 279/3

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

9

2006/C 279/4

Commission communication concerning the procedure laid down by Article 1, para 4 of Council Directive 96/67/EC

13

2006/C 279/5

Notice inviting applications for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block Q7 of the Dutch continental shelf.

16

2006/C 279/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4442 — Carphone Warehouse /AOL UK) (1)

17

2006/C 279/7

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4440 — GE/DISKO/ASL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  325,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               326,913
<PP&E>                                      16,620,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                 494,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,453,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,453,198
<SALES>                                        818,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               818,818
<CGS>                                          143,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  639,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                179,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            179,347
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   179,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Radiologix,
Inc. (the "COMPANY"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"), I, Stephen D. Linehan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780 (d); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Stephen D. Linehan
-------------------------------------
Stephen D. Linehan
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 14, 2003






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Hong Liang Lu, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of UTStarcom, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: August 9, 2006                                                | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/HONG LIANG LUHong Liang Lu President and Chief Executive Officer | 

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael J. Cantineri, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 522]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *{see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Joseph William Latham, J. — Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Sconiers, JJ.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 1 0 7 5 8 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. A N T H O N Y B O N N E R , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 3 : 0 8

- C R

- 3 3 2

- 8

B e f o r e J O L L Y , S T E W A R T , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t A n t h o n y B o n n e r h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. B o n n e r h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e

r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s

e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 22 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-10758 Document: 00511149867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 1 of 37 PageID #:212

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 2 of 37 PageID #:213

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 3 of 37 PageID #:214

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 4 of 37 PageID #:215

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 5 of 37 PageID #:216

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 6 of 37 PageID #:217

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 7 of 37 PageID #:218

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 8 of 37 PageID #:219

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 9 of 37 PageID #:220

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 10 of 37 PageID #:221

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 11 of 37 PageID #:222

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 12 of 37 PageID #:223

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 13 of 37 PageID #:224

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 14 of 37 PageID #:225

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 15 of 37 PageID #:226

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 16 of 37 PageID #:227

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 17 of 37 PageID #:228

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 18 of 37 PageID #:229

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 19 of 37 PageID #:230

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 20 of 37 PageID #:231

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 21 of 37 PageID #:232

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 22 of 37 PageID #:233

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 23 of 37 PageID #:234

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 24 of 37 PageID #:235

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 25 of 37 PageID #:236

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 26 of 37 PageID #:237

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 27 of 37 PageID #:238

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 28 of 37 PageID #:239

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 29 of 37 PageID #:240

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 30 of 37 PageID #:241

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 31 of 37 PageID #:242

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 32 of 37 PageID #:243

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 33 of 37 PageID #:244

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 34 of 37 PageID #:245

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 35 of 37 PageID #:246

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 36 of 37 PageID #:247

Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 49 Filed: 05/13/04 Page 37 of 37 PageID #:248