41448 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices 

*Selected as mandatory respondents, these 

companies were found to be part of the China-wide 

entity in the instant review. 

1See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from Mexico: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 7067 (January 26, 2021) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2 Id. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

the Final Results of the 2018–2019 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated April 8, 2021. 

cash deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, then zero cash 

deposit will be required); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that received a separate rate 

in a prior segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for 

all Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter that 

supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during these 

PORs. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

the preliminary results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B), 

751(a)(3) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 26, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies that are subject to this 

administrative review that are considered to 

be part of the China-wide entity are: 

ASHINE Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd. 

Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd. 

Danyang Tongyu Tools Co., Ltd. 

Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Diamond Tools Technology (Thailand) Co., 

Ltd. 

Fujian Quanzhou Aotu Precise Machine Co., 

Ltd. 

Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading 

Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Hebei XMF Tools Group Co., Ltd. 

Henan Huanghe Whirlwind Co., Ltd. 

Henan Huanghe Whirlwind International Co., 

Ltd. 

Hong Kong Hao Xin International Group 

Limited 

Hubei Changjiang Precision Engineering 

Materials Technology Co., Ltd. 

Hubei Sheng Bai Rui Diamond Tools Co., 

Ltd. 

Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd. 

Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity *

Jiangsu Huachang Diamond Tools 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation 

Jiangsu Yaofeng Tools Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd. 

Orient Gain International Limited 

Pantos Logistics (HK) Company Limited 

Protec Tools Co., Ltd. 

Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., 

Ltd. 

Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Quanzhou Sunny Superhard Tools Co., Ltd. 

Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd. 

Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd. 

Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co. Ltd. 

Shanghai Vinon Tools Industrial Co. 

Sino Tools Co., Ltd. 

Wuhan Baiyi Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

Wuhan Sadia Trading Co., Ltd. 

Wuhan ZhaoHua Technology Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Wanli Tool Group Co., Ltd. *

ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd. 

ZL Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2021–16418 Filed 7–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–847] 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 

Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that the producers/ 

exporters subject to this administrative 

review did not make sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR) 

September 1, 2018, through August 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable August 2, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger or David Crespo, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–3693, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This review covers 11 producers/ 

exporters of the subject merchandise. 

Commerce selected two companies, 

Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero) 

and Productos Laminados de Monterrey 

S.A. de C.V. (Prolamsa) (collectively, the 

mandatory respondents), for individual 

examination. The producers/exporters 

not selected for individual examination 

are listed in Appendix II. 

On January 26, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results.2 On March 8, 

2021, Nucor Tubular Products Inc. (i.e., 

the domestic interested party) and 

Maquilacero filed case briefs. On March 

17, 2021, the domestic interested party, 

Maquilacero, and Prolamsa filed 

rebuttal briefs. On April 8, 2021, we 

postponed the final results until July 23, 

2021.3 For a description of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices 41449 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Heavy Walled Rectangular 

Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Mexico; 

2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

5For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

6See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

7Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the allothers rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins established for exporters and 

producers individually examined, excluding any 

margins that are zero or de minimis margins, and 

any margins determined entirely {on the basis of 

facts available}.’’ For these final results, we have 

calculated weighted-average dumping margins for 

Maquilacero and Prolamsa that are zero, and we 

have not calculated any margins which are not zero, 

de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of 

facts available. Accordingly, we have assigned to 

the companies not individually examined a margin 

of zero percent. The exporters/producers subject to 

this review, but not selected for individual review, 

are listed in Appendix II. 

8This rate was calculated as discussed in footnote 

7, above. 

9See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

10For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

heavy walled rectangular welded steel 

pipes and tubes from Mexico.5 Products 

subject to the order are currently 

classified under the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

item number 7306.61.1000. Subject 

merchandise may also be classified 

under 7306.61.3000. Although the 

HTSUS numbers and ASTM 

specification are provided for 

convenience and for customs purposes, 

the written product description remains 

dispositive. 

Analysis of the Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in Appendix I 

to this notice and addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

calculations for Maquilacero and 

Prolamsa, and the companies not 

selected for individual review, for the 

final results.6

Final Results of the Review 

We are assigning the following 

weighted-average dumping margins to 

the firms listed below for the period 

September 1, 2018, through August 31, 

2019: 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Maquilacero S.A. de C.V ............ 0.00 

Productos Laminados de 

Monterrey S.A. de C.V ............ 0.00 

Companies Not Selected for Individual Review 7 ..................... 0.00 

Review-Specific Rate for Companies 

Not Selected for Individual Review 

The dumping margins for the 

exporters or producers not selected for 

individual review are listed in 

Appendix II. 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these final results to interested 

parties within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where Maquilacero and Prolamsa 

reported the entered value of their U.S. 

sales, we calculated importer-specific 

ad valorem duty assessment rates based 

on the ratio of the total amount of 

dumping calculated for the examined 

sales to the total entered value of the 

sales for which entered value was 

reported. Where Prolamsa did not report 

entered value, we calculated the entered 

value in order to determine the 

assessment rate. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review, because 

we are assigning these companies an 

assessment rate based on the cash 

deposit rate calculated for Maquilacero 

and Prolamsa,8 we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate these entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. The final results of 

this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review.9

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Maquilacero or Prolamsa for which 

the reviewed companies did not know 

that the merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.10

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 41 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 356.8(a). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be equal to 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

that is established in the final results of 

this review, except if the rate is less 

than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not covered in this review, 

the cash deposit will continue to be the 

company-specific cash deposit rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment in which the 

company was reviewed; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
41450 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices 

11See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Korea, 

Mexico, and the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 81 FR 62865, 62866 (September 13, 

2016). 

12For these final results, we have calculated 

weighted-average dumping margins for Maquilacero 

and Prolamsa that are zero, and we have not 

calculated any margins which are not zero, de 

minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts 

available. Accordingly, we have assigned to the 

companies not individually examined a margin of 

zero percent. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 

1See Countervailing Duty Order; Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) 

from India, 67 FR 44179 (July 1, 2002) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

54983 (September 3, 2020). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet and Strip from India: Extension of 

Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019,’’ dated February 

25, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results, Partial Rescission and 

Intent to Rescind in Part of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet, and Strip from India; 2019,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

investigation, but the producer is, then 

the cash deposit rate will be the cash 

deposit rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers or 

exporters will continue to be 4.91 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.11 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: July 22, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Margin Calculations 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

General Issues 

Comment 1: Deduction of 232 Duties 

Issues Related to Maquilacero 

Comment 2: Alleged Error in Calculating 

Quarterly Cost of Hot-rolled Coil (HRC) 

Comment 3: Adjustment to Costs for NonPrime Products 

Comment 4: Adjustment to Maquilacero’s 

Scrap Offset 

Issues Related to Prolamsa 

Comment 5: Home Market Level of Trade 

(LOT) and Constructed Export Price 

(CEP) Offset 

Comment 6: Overrun Sales Outside the 

Ordinary Course of Trade 

Comment 7: Errors in the Application of 

U.S. Freight Revenue 

Comment 8: Claimed Inventory 

Adjustment to Raw Material Costs 

Comment 9: Error in Standard Cost 

Adjustment 

Comment 10: Change in Average Useful 

Life (AUL) of Certain Assets 

Comment 11: Calculation of General and 

Administrative (G&A) Expense Ratio 

Comment 12: Adjustment to Prolamsa’s 

Scrap Offset 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Review-Specific Rate Applicable to 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review: 12

Exporter or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Arco Metal S.A. de C.V .............. 0.00 

Forza Steel S.A. de C.V ............. 0.00 

Industrias Monterrey, S.A. de 

C.V .......................................... 0.00 

Perfiles y Herrajes LM S.A. de 

C.V .......................................... 0.00 

PYTCO S.A. de C.V ................... 0.00 

Regiomontana de Perfiles y 

Tubos S.A. de C.V .................. 0.00 

Ternium S.A. de C.V .................. 0.00 

Tuberia Nacional, S.A. de C.V ... 0.00 

Tuberias Procarsa S.A. de C.V .. 0.00 

[FR Doc. 2021–16396 Filed 7–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–825] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From India: 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review, 

Rescission in Part, and Intent To 

Rescind in Part; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to SRF Limited/SRF Limited 

of India (SRF), a producer and exporter 

of polyethylene terephthalate film, 

sheet, and strip (PET film) from India. 

The period of review is January 1, 2019, 

through December 31, 2019. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable August 2, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nicholas Czajkowski or Konrad 

Ptaszynski, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1395 or 

(202) 482–6187, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2002, Commerce published 

in the Federal Register the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on PET 

film from India.1 On September 3, 2020, 

Commerce published a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

the Order.2 On February 25, 2021, 

Commerce extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results of this review to no 

later than July 30, 2021.3 For a complete 

description of the events that followed 

the initiation of this review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES