alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 123/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 123 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6321 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 123

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6321 April 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/549 of 20 April 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 on protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2020) 2592)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/549 of 20 April 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 on protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2020) 2592)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 2592)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.1



BEA SYSTEMS, INC.



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the periodic report of BEA Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Alfred S. Chuang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                         |  | 
|------------------------ |  | 
|Date: September 15, 2003 |  | 
|                         |  |
DENY and Opinion Filed August 12, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00684-CV 

IN RE B.D. AND T.M.D., Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 305th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. JC-20-00439-W 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith 

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness 

In this original proceeding, relators complain about the trial court’s issuance 

of a writ of attachment enforcing the final judgment in the underlying suit affecting 

the parent-child relationship. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to 

show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate 

appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 

2004) (orig. proceeding). 

After reviewing the petition, responses, and the record, we conclude that 

relators failed to demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX.R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

 
 –2– 

We also lift the stay issued by our July 18, 2022 order. 

220684F.P05 

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

JUSTICE
Order filed October 24, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-13-00711-CV

____________

IN RE ULLICO CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

23rd District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 60307

O R D E R

On August 9, 2013, relators, Ullico Casualty Company, Contego Recovery 

LLC, Contego Services Group, LLC, Patriot Underwriters, Inc., Patriot National 

Insurance Group, Inc., Steven M. Mariano, Linda Webb, Richard Wersinger, Patriot 

Risk Services, Inc., and Patricia Kelty, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this 

court. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. Relators ask this court to order the 

Honorable Ben Hardin, Judge of 23rd District Court, in Brazoria County, Texas, to 

set aside his August 5, 2013 orders (1) granting partial summary judgment in favor 

of real parties interest and (2) denying relators’ opposed motion for entry of an order 

confirming the stay of all proceedings, entered in trial court cause number 60307, 
styled Charlene Hembree, et al. v.Thermal Polymer System, LC, et al.

Relators filed concurrently with their petition for writ of mandamus a motion 

to stay the trial court proceedings, pending a decision on the petition for writ of 

mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10. On August 12, 2013, we granted relators’ 

motion to stay the trial court proceedings. 

We ORDER the STAY of all trial court proceedings LIFTED. Relators’ 

petition for writ of mandamus remains pending in this court.

We further ORDER this proceeding set for oral argument on Thursday, 

December 5, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in accordance with this court’s notice of 

submission. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Busby and Donovan.

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Greico, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), rendered on January 25, 1985, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). No opinion. Concur&emdash;Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Fein, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 4 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 5 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 6 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 7 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 8 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 9 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 10 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 11 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 12 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 13 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 14 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 15 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 16 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 17 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 18 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 19 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 20 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 21 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 22 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 23 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 24 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 25 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 26 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 27 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 28 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 29 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 30 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 31 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 32 of 33Case 10-00909 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 13:06:06 Desc Main Document Page 33 of 33
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crop Production and Pest Control Research: West Lafayette, IN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area West Lafayette, Indiana Crop Production and Pest Control Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

People and Locations at West Lafayette, Indiana   [Expand All] [Collapse All]
  (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
----

(2004/C 70 E/016)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3646/02

by Hanja Maij-Weggen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 December 2002)

Subject:   Detention of Juan Carlos Gonzalez Leiva

As the Commission is aware, Juan Carlos Gonzalez Leiva, the chairman of the Cuban Human Rights Foundation and the Brotherhood of the Independent Blind People of Cuba, has been detained in prison in Holguín, Cuba, since March 2002 (see written question E-1458/02 (1)).

Is the Commission also aware that he is being assaulted and beaten, and is in danger of dying of malnutrition?

Will the Commission take action and bring pressure to bear on the authorities there in order to secure an end to the violent treatment meted out to human rights activists in Cuba?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(14 February 2003)

The Commission is being kept informed regularly of the situation of Mr Gonzalez Leiva. According to its information the human rights activist weighed only 90 pounds at the beginning of January 2003 due to a fast he began on 4 September 2002 and which he ended on 25 December 2002 in order to protest against the accusations against him and other activists involved in the case.

The Commission has repeatedly drawn the attention of the Cuban authorities to the situation of Mr Gonzalez Leiva and the human rights situation in general. As with other partner countries, the internal human rights situation is and will remain an important aspect of our relationship with Cuba. The Commission believes that a policy of engagement and dialogue is the most likely to help bringing about a positive evolution in this respect.

----

(1)OJ C 28 E, 6.2.2003, p. 109.

----
#### In the Matter of Barline D. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Florence D., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Bernardo D. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Florence D., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Jessica D. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Florence D., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)

[942 NYS2d 882] —

In related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Olshansky, J.), dated April 6, 2011, which denied her motion to reopen the dispositional hearings for the subject children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother’s motion to reopen the dispositional hearings *(see Matter of Alize Lee D. [April Veronica W.],*73 AD3d 767, 768 [2010]). The procedural remedies available to a party who seeks to affect an order of disposition terminating his or her parental rights are to move for leave to renew or reargue *(see*CPLR 2221), to petition for modification of the order *(see*Family Ct Act § 635), or to appeal from the order *(see*CPLR 5501 *et seq.).*Here, the mother failed to seek leave to renew or reargue the orders of disposition or to petition for modification of those orders. Further, this Court previously dismissed the mother’s appeals from the orders of disposition based on her failure to perfect the appeals. Thus, the Family Court properly denied the mother’s motion to reopen the dispositional hearings *(see Matter of Jessica D. [Florence D.],*17 NY3d 711 [2011]).

*883The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit or not properly before this Court. Mastro, A.P.J., Balkin, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.
#### Linderman *v.*Atkins.

Atkinson, J.

1. Where a person executed a negotiable promissory note and a deed to land to secure the debt, and received a bond for reconveyance of the land upon payment of the debt, the consideration of the note being the promise of the payee to make a certain advancement in money and to pay off certain indebtedness of the son of the maker, and the note was indorsed in blank and delivered to a third person, the mere facts that the transferee of the note was a banker in a town and knew the payee as a customer in the bank, and, after the note fell due, instituted suit thereon against the maker after his son had died, without joining the indorser as a party defendant, and had not taken a formal transfer of the land conveyed as security, would not of themselves be sufficient to charge notice to the transferee of any failure of consideration of the note by reason of the failure of the payee to advance the agreed amount of money or pay off the debts of the son; nor would such facts be sufficient to put the transferee upon inquiry as to any such failure of consideration.

2. A transferee of a negotiable promissory note, who received the note from the payee before maturity, as collateral security for a pre-existing debt, without notice of any equities existing between the maker and the payee, is a bona fide holder for value in the due course of trade. *Kaiser*v. *U. S. National Bank,*99 *Ga.*258 (25 S. E. 620) ; *Harrell*v. *National Bank of Commerce,*128 *Ga.*504 (57 S. E. 869).

3. Where such a holder of a negotiable promissory note, who has received it from the payee merely as collateral security, sues the maker of such note, if the maker has a valid defense against the original payee, he can by appropriate plea set up such defense; and if it be sustained, the holder can recover no more than the debt which the collateral secured. *Hatcher*v. *Independence National Bank of Philadelphia,*79 *Ga.*547 (5 S. E. 111); *Laster*v. *Stewart,*89 *Ga.*181 (15 S. E. 42). But in such a suit the presumption is that the secured debt is sufficient to consume the collateral, and the onus of pleading and proving a less amount *367and the maker’s equity against the original payee is on the defendant. Daniel on Negotiable Instruments, § 832 (a) ; Duncan & Sherman *v.*Gilbert, 29 N. J. L. (5 Dutch.) 527.

April 17, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Brand. Banks superior court. January 8, 1914.

*R. L. J. & 8. J. Smith*and *John J. & Roy M. Strickland,*for plaintiff in error. *P. Cooley,*contra.

4. The evidence demanded the verdict for the plaintiff, and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report on  Form  10-Q of Synovics
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the for the quarterly  period ended
July 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),
I, Ronald  Howard Lane,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the
     dates presented and  consolidated  results of operations of the Company for
     the periods presented.

Dated: September 18, 2006


By:  /s/ Ronald Howard Lane
     ----------------------------
     Ronald Howard Lane
     Principal Financial Officer



This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Synovics  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  and will be retained by Synovics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 29 

To permit the waiving of the reading of an amendment if the text and 

adequate notice are provided. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 27, 2011 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. MERKLEY) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To permit the waiving of the reading of an amendment 

if the text and adequate notice are provided. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. READING OF AMENDMENTS. 

3 (a) STANDING ORDER.—This section shall be a 

4 standing order of the Senate. 

5 (b) WAIVER.—The reading of an amendment may be 

6 waived by a non-debatable motion if the amendment— 

7 (1) has been submitted at least 72 hours before 

8 the motion; and 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 29 ATS 

1 (2) is available in printed or electronic form in 

2 the Congressional Record. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6416
BUSTER MARSHALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOE MITCHELL; GENE ERVIN; JAMES A. MANN, in their individual, professional and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-26-6-3AK) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 4, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Buster Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advisedAppellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED