alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Tiosha J. and Others, Infants. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kachoya H., Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 386]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Patricia A. Maxwell, J.), entered December 21, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the parental rights of respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order that, inter alia, terminated her parental rights with respect to three of her children on the ground of permanent neglect. We affirm. It is undisputed that the mother cared for the oldest child for a period of only 10 months following the child’s birth and that her twin daughters were removed at birth and were never returned to her care. Contrary to the mother’s contention, petitioner met its burden of proving “by clear and convincing evidence that it made diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the relationship between [the mother] and [her] child[ren]” *(Matter of Ja-Nathan F.,*309 AD2d 1152 [2003]; *see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). The record establishes that petitioner tailored services to her needs with respect to domestic violence, parenting, and substance abuse *(see Matter of La’Derrick J.W. [Ashley W.],*85 AD3d 1600, 1601 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 709 [2011]; *see generally Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 142 [1984]). Petitioner also established that the mother failed to plan for the future of her children, although able to do so *(see La’Derrick J.W.,*85 AD3d at 1601-1602). Although the mother completed a parenting and a domestic violence program and regularly attended supervised weekly visitation with the children, she refused to attend another domestic violence program after the children’s father assaulted her and damaged furniture and the interior of her home. The mother also refused to attend recommended drug treatment; failed to provide petitioner’s employees access to her home, the condition of which resulted in the removal of her oldest child; and failed to verify her income.

The court properly determined that it was in the best interests of the children to terminate the mother’s parental rights. In the nearly three years from the date on which the pe*1499tition was filed until the date on which the dispositional hearing was conducted, the mother failed adequately to address the issues that caused the removal of her children *(see Matter of Rachael N. [Christine N.],*70 AD3d 1374 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 708 [2010]). We have reviewed the mother’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present — Scudder, *P.J.,*Smith, Fahey, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                           5,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                       766
<INVENTORY>                                     20,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,560
<PP&E>                                         178,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,082
<BONDS>                                        177,071
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   330,371
<SALES>                                        271,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,821
<CGS>                                          225,145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,056
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (285)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (285)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Laura FAUGHT, Steven Faught, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees John Howe, et al., Intervenors-Plaintiffs, Miriam Chapon, John Chapon, Intervenor-Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN HOME SHIELD CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, Todd Pettitt, Sharon Lee, Interested-Parties-Appellants.

No. 10-12533.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2011.

D. Frank Davis, John E. Norris, Tyler Vail, Wesley W. Barnett, Davis & Norris, LLP, Lea Bone, Bates & Bone, LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

John W. Davis, Law Offices of John W. Davis, San Diego, CA, R. Shephen Griffis, Birmingham, AL, Charles Nutley, Kendrick Nutley, Pasadena, CA, for Interve-nor-Plaintiffs-Appellants, Interested-Parties-Appellants.

Charles M. Thompson, Birmingham, AL, pro se.

Scott Burnett Smith, John E. Goodman, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP, Huntsville, AL, Joel S. Feldman, Rachel B. Niewoehner, Julie Weber, Sidley Austin, LLP, Chicago, IL, Doy Leale McCall, III, Hill, Hill, Carter, Franco, Cole & Black, Montgomery, AL, Michael Dale McKibben, Michael R. Pennington, Jason A. Walters, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Patricia M. Tulinski, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for State of Texas.

Frank H. Tomlinson, Frank H. Tomlin-son, Attorney at Law, Kearney Dee Hut-sler, III, Birmingham, AL, N. Albert Ba-charach, Jr., N. Albert Bacharach, Jr., PA, Gainesville, FL, for Intervenors-Plaintiffs.

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, CARNES, Circuit Judge, and SANDS,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable W. Louis Sands, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Consolidated Objecting Class Members (the “objectors”) appeal the district court’s *446order denying an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.

Even putting aside timeliness issues presented by the Appellees, the objectors are entitled to attorneys’ fees only in the event that they can show either (1) that they conferred some benefit on the class or (2) that they substantially improved the settlement under consideration. *See, e.g., Uselton v. Commercial Lovelace, Inc., 9*F.3d 849, 855 (10th Cir.1993); *City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.,*560 F.2d 1093, 1098 (2d Cir.1977). The burden is on the objectors to show one of these criteria has been met. The district court, in a well reasoned opinion, concluded that they had not carried that burden.

This court reviews such finings for abuse of discretion. *Haitian Refugee Ctr. v. Meese,*791 F.2d 1489, *1496*(11th Cir.1986). The district court laid out in detail how the objectors’ claims were based on speculation that is unsupported by the record. We agree with these findings; therefore, we conclude that the district couit did not abuse its discretion and affirm the denial of attorneys’ fees and costs.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Richard S. Gilbert, Chief Executive Officer of Copper Mountain Networks, Inc. (the Company), and Michael O. Staiger, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:



1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 8th day of November, 2004.



/s/ Richard S. GilbertRichard S. GilbertChairman andChief Executive Officer/s/ Michael O. StaigerMichael O. StaigerExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Copper Mountain Networks, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Orders & ServicesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes Docs Cudrania Inventory







Mainheadline bar Repository Inventory of Available Accessions forCudrania In Order by Species & Cultivar**Available Cudrania (Mulberry Relative) Accessions**Accession IDGenusSpeciesPI #CultivarCountry of OriginDMOR0047.CudraniatricuspidataChe' Seedless***Summer request for *Cudrania*germplasm should only be made if propagation will occur under mist.********Questions?** Email: Jenny SmithFind an order form on ourProducts & Servicespage


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# Official Journal C 447A/12 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 447A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6112 December 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 447A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6112 December 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Banking Authority |
| 2018/C 447 A/01 | Notification of vacancy notice for Chairperson of the EBA (Grade AD 15) — Paris, France — EBA TA 21/2018 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Banking Authority

2018/C 447 A/01

Notification of vacancy notice for Chairperson of the EBA (Grade AD 15) — Paris, France — EBA TA 21/2018

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Banking Authority

| 12.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 447/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 447/1

---

NOTIFICATION OF VACANCY NOTICE FOR CHAIRPERSON OF THE EBA (GRADE AD 15) — PARIS, FRANCE — EBA TA 21/2018

(2018/C 447 A/01)

The European Banking Authority (EBA) is an independent European Union Authority established on 1 January 2011 by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

With a view to improving the functioning of the European Union internal market, the EBA contributes to ensuring a high quality, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision in its areas of competence. It also promotes public values such as the stability of the financial system, the transparency of markets and financial products, and the protection of depositors and investors.

It works to prevent regulatory arbitrage and guarantee a level playing field, strengthens international supervisory coordination, promotes supervisory convergence and provides advice to the Union institutions in the areas of banking, payments and e-money regulation and supervision, and related corporate governance, auditing and financial reporting issues.

The Chairperson is a full-time independent professional member of EBA staff. He/she will be accountable to the EBA Board of Supervisors and will report to the Board of Supervisors on an on-going basis on the development of the EBA activities.

Please consult our website for the detailed vacancy notice and procedure for application:

https://eba.europa.eu/about-us/careers

Applications including a curriculum vitae preferably in the Europass format, a motivation letter and a filled declaration form, dated and signed, must be submitted in English to the following address: EBAChair-Applications@eba.europa.eu by 11 January 2019 at 12.00 noon London time.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12).

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CLINTON TOWNSHIP

v.

THE ZONING HEARING BOARD OF

CLINTON TOWNSHIP AND TEEN CHALLENGE TRAINING CENTER, INC.

PETITION OF: TEEN CHALLENGE TRAINING CENTER, INC. :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 388 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# C_2006010EN.01000602.xml

| 14.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/6

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 13 October 2005

in Case C-3/05 SA: Statistical Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities)

(2006/C 10/13)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-3/05 SA: application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities brought on 28 January 2005 by Statistical Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan, established in Almaty (Kazakhstan) (lawyer: R. Nathan) against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J-F. Pasquier and E. Manhaeve) — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), A. La Pergola, J.-P. Puissochet and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 13 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on this case. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on this case.

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82 of 02.04.2005

1

---
OFFICE OF THE ATIORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AU%TlN 

Ron. ShsZburne R. @$wer 

county Attorn y 

?rarion ccunty 

Je~fermn, Terss 

lhar Slrt 

te, mquestin#j tha 

abev4 quistion, haa 

eaenb the asttllab 34W 

horfty of Cowslaaionere* 

T%' fh%ll'tS hlWe Only nueh 

the Con%tltutlan and the 

ah- Coizpsny VB. ~M.~~~JMoo;~ 

Col%vli8a~onere' aourt oan exercise only %u& 

~~~424 44 the Crnotitutlon or the &#elatura apeoific3elly 

aonf4rr ugen tams. law -88. mat4, 97 I38 ana 864. 

The CoaaPirtifoneoo' Curt $8 4, ore8ture of the 

Constitution, and ite,pmava em liEltte4 by the Ccrast,ituttan an4 tfa laws. El &m County vs. Elani, 104 SW IBnd 

563. 
The r;omtnlpiossre~, Court ic not vested with 

gnera~ pol1;pe ‘Pow+. Cdarmi%B~OXdX~oUrt”Oi ’~’ fkd’i% 

unty OC. hleir~ &%-cm and 840. 

Icoor4lngl7, tho,+n%dr%lonqr%~.~ Court ot 

k!erlon County 0e.a rxprnd ooQnty.‘fudla Xtir~tho~qhrpo8eb 

deaorlb8d bp you in 7our l%t.tm ohl7. l$ the authority 

thsnfor la found in the Conatltutlanbr la tS’% d’dtutory 

@n~~%nt% of the f%Q;lalat\trs. We hat% dlllg%ntly %%%rohid..thr Conrtltutlon en4 thr statute%, an4 hew been unl bla to find aa authgrltyti.mprefm oc implied, whioh 

wou1a fiuthok&e thir prop0pea %xp%ndltur% ot ooullty 

3unar bp th8’ Bbepri~%~tmIJra~‘Eourtiot Orion County. 

‘Fble~,he% been th% uoiforn holdlnCC of thi8 

Department on similar questl6i.u. For example, it we8 

held.b7 thir lhportnant in O~lnlon Ro. O-&514, to Ron. 

Truett tnith, Dletrlot Attorney, T8haka, Torna, that 

the Commiesioaf~r8~ Court war without euthority to expend aaunt fun40 Tar the employment of e spoolal ottioer to work In four oounties for the p 

handing oattle thieveat It was kel4 by “f: t 

088 of rrpprs1% Eqmrtmnt 

in Opinion No. O-591, to Ron. Charlea 8. Thoobald, County 

Attornsy, dnlveston Texe%, thet the Coml%%loner%~ 

Court oi delvraton Eaunty, Texas was without authority 

to expend oouaty fun48 for the mmplo %nt of MT% guard% 

for the Cklverton Eb%oh; en4 in Cpin P on No. O-1899, to 
Ron. Shelburno H. Olover, Peaa S 

lion. John R. ahook, Crlmlnal Mstrlot Attorney, Gan 

Mtonlo, Taxer, thet the Cocmlsslonsrr~ Courf of 

Fiexar County 00~14 not legal17 oxpem! mwy rrcm any 

of the Bexar County fun68 for fire poteotlrn iron 

the City of San Antonio for 4lrtrlotr outel4e of the 

oltp %a4 in the oounty. 

Your que8tlon 18, thereiore, rrspeotiully 

anand In the negatlvo. 

We rean:n, 

Very truly your8 

Al’l’ORNEY G3ilSAL OF TEXAG 

ATTOFWEY GEiNmAi, OF Ti;[A$ 

COMMIHCC
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1036

To amend section 435(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Higher Education Act of 1965

with respect to the definition of an eligible lender.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 17, 1997

Mr. ALLARD (for himself and Mr. CAMPBELL) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and

Human Resources

A BILL

To amend section 435(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Higher Education

Act of 1965 with respect to the definition of an eligible

lender.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act maybe cited as the ‘‘Kid’s Bark Act.’’

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ELIGIBLE LENDER.

6 Section 435(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Higher Education Act

7 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1085(d)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended—

8 (1) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘or’’ after

9 ‘‘1992,’’; and
2

•S 1036 IS

1 (2) by striking the semicolon at the end and in2 serting ‘‘, or (III) it is a bank that is a wholly owned

3 subsidiary of a nonprofit foundation, the foundation

4 is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under

6 section 501(a) of such Code, and the bank makes

7 loans under this part only to undergraduate students

8 who are age 22 or younger and has a portfolio of

9 such loans that is not more than $10,000,000;’’.

Æ
# Official Journal C 379A/10 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 379A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6010 November 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 379A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6010 November 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2017/C 379 A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition EUIPO/AST/02/17 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of intellectual property | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2017/C 379 A/01

Reserve list — Open competition EUIPO/AST/02/17 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of intellectual property

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                Subsidiaries of
                            OYO Geospace Corporation



5404339 and More Royalties Company, a Nevada corporation
Concord Technologies, Inc., a Texas corporation
Control Logic, Inc., a Texas corporation
Geo Space Corporation, a Texas corporation
Houston Geophysical Products, Inc., a Texas corporation
OYO Geo Space Canada, Inc., an Alberta corporation
OYO Geospace EAME Limited, a United Kingdom company
OYO Geospace International, Inc., a Barbados corporation
OYO Geospace J.V., Inc., a Texas corporation
OYO Instruments, Inc., a Texas corporation