alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Slip Op. 14 - 149 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

: CATFISH FARMERS OF AMERICA, et al ., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge : UNITED STATES, : Court No. 11-00252 : Defendant, : : and : : IDI CORPORATION and : THIEN MA SEAFOOD COMPANY, LTD., : : Defendant-Intervenors. : : OPINION [Sustaining remand results on seventh new shipper reviews of antidumping duty order on frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.] Dated: December 19, 2014 Valerie A. Slater , Jarrod M. Goldfeder , Natalya D. Dobrowolsky , and Nicole M. D’Avanzo , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, of Washington DC, for the plaintiffs. Ryan M. Majerus , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington DC, argued for the defendant. On the brief were Stuart F. Delery , Assistant Attorney General, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr. , Director, and Franklin E. White , Jr. , Assistant Director. Of Counsel was David W. Richardson , Attorney-International, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce. Matthew J. McConkey , Mayer Brown LLP, of Washington DC, for defendant-intervenors IDI Corporation and Thien Ma Seafood Company, Ltd.Court No. 11-00252 Page 2 Musgrave, Senior Judge: In this Court No. 11-00252, the plaintiffs contested aspects of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews , 76 Fed. Reg. 35403 (June 17, 2011) (seventh new shipper reviews) that were virtually identical to certain issues raised in Court No. 11-00109 and that were addressed in the context of Slip Op. 13-63 (May 23, 2013), familiarity with which is here presumed. Consistent therewith, this case was remanded to the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) for further proceedings. Slip Op. 13-91 (July 22, 2013). The remand results entail Commerce’s analysis of the two broad issues remanded with the case for reconsideration, and they explain why Commerce continued on remand to maintain the selection of Bangladesh as the primary surrogate country and also explain the selection of surrogate values (“SVs”) for the fish waste and fish skin by-products using information from the “Vitarich” price quote. Accounting for all calculation changes that resulted from addressing the issues of the prior opinion(s), including Commerce’s voluntary remand request on the fish waste SV, Commerce determined the margins for all respondents as de minimis , including those for defendant-intervenors IDI Corporation and Thien Ma Seafood Company, who submitted comments on the draft remand results to Commerce but submit no further comments here. The plaintiffs argue for further remand with respect to Commerce’s “broad market average” analysis and “specificity” ( i.e. , level of trade) reasoning, but for the reasons explained in Slip Op. 14-144 (Dec. 18, 2014), the results of remand will be sustained and judgment entered to that effect.

/s/ R. Kenton Musgrave Dated: December 19, 2014 R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge New York, New York
Exhibit 13.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with this Annual Report of Nordic American Tankers Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Turid M. Sørensen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.








Date: April 7, 2014








/s/ Turid M. Sørensen


Turid M. Sørensen


Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 143 (Thursday, July 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40881-40882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

[[Page 40882]]


NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE:  Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 
(#13883) (Zoom Videoconference).

DATE AND TIME: 
    September 28, 2021; 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    September 29, 2021, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

PLACE:  National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, 
Alexandria, VA 22314 (Zoom Videoconference).
    Attendance information for the meeting will be forthcoming on the 
website: https://www.nsf.gov/mps/ast/aaac.jsp.

TYPE OF MEETING:  Open.

CONTACT PERSON:  Dr. Martin Still, Program Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, Suite W 9188, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-4290.

PURPOSE OF MEETING:  To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues 
within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual 
interest and concern to the agencies.

AGENDA: To hear presentations of current programming by representatives 
from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to astronomy and 
astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas of cooperation 
between the agencies; to formulate recommendations for continued and 
new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for achieving them.

    Dated: July 23, 2021.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-16114 Filed 7-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research: Logan, UT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Logan, Utah Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research Docs





- Directions
- Bee Lab Main

Directionsheadline bar Directions to Utah State University are available at http://www.usu.edu/visit/directions/. A campus map with directions to the Pollinating Insect -- Biology, Management adn Systematics Research Unit are available at http://www.usu.edu/map.  Expand the Building Index list and select **Biology and Natural Resources** to find our exact location.  Our main office is located on the second floor in Room 261.  Our contact information is as follows: USDA-ARS Pollinating Insects Research UnitBNR Room 261Dept. Biology UMC 5310Utah State UniversityLogan, UT 84322-5310Phone: (435)797-2524Fax: (435)797-0461Attn: Diana Cox-Foster Our second location ***(Head House)*** can be located at http://www.usu.edu/map.  Expand the Building Index list and select **Bee Lab** to find that location.  Contact Rosalind James *(above)* for more information.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 24, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00947-CV 

TADAEL GIRMA MELKA, Appellant 

V. 

KYLE SARLES, MATTHEW SHULER, AND MURPHY POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 199-02660-2023 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Smith, Miskel, and Breedlove 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

On January 25, 2024, we notified appellant, who is proceeding pro se, that his 

brief failed to comply with rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. We listed numerous defects in the brief, including that it did 

not contain a statement of the case, a table of authorities, or a table of contents. 

More importantly, the brief did not contain any citations to the record or to 

authorities. We instructed appellant to file an amended brief correcting the 

deficiencies within ten days. 
 –2– 

The purpose of an appellant’s brief is to acquaint the Court with the issues in 

a case and to present argument that will enable us to decide the case. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.9. And we are not responsible for searching the record for facts that may 

be favorable to a party’s position. Bolling v. Farmers Branch Indep. Sch. Dist., 315 

S.W.3d 893, 895 (Tex. App—Dallas 2010, no pet.)(citing Fredonia State Bank v. 

Gen. Am. Life Ins. Co., 881 S.W.2d 279, 283–284 (Tex. 1994)). Thus, the right to 

appellate review extends only to complaints made in accordance with our rules of 

appellate procedure, which require an appellant to concisely articulate the issues we 

are asked to decide, to make clear, concise, and specific arguments in support of 

appellant’s position, to cite appropriate authorities, and to specify the pages in the 

record where each alleged error can be found. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1; Lee v. 

Abbott, No. 05-18-01185-CV, 2019 WL 1970521, at *1 (Tex. App—Dallas May 3, 

2019, no pet.) (mem. op.); Bolling, 315 S.W.3d at 895. 

 Even liberally construing appellant’s brief, we conclude that it is wholly 

inadequate to present any questions for appellate review and is in flagrant violation 

of rule 38.1. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1; Bolling, 315 S.W.3d at 895. Further, although 

directed to correct all deficiencies, appellant has failed to do so. 

 
 –3– 

 Under these circumstances, we strike appellant’s brief and dismiss this appeal for 

want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a); 42.3(b),(c). 

230947F.P05 

 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE 
 –4– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

TADAEL GIRMA MELKA, 

Appellant 

No. 05-23-00947-CV V. 

KYLE SARLES, MATTHEW 

SHULER, AND MURPHY POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 199th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 199-02660-

2023. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Miskel and Breedlove 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered July 24, 2024
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.52


                   AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, effective as of July 1, 2000 is
by and between Radiologix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and
Paul M. Jolas ("Jolas").

         WHEREAS, the parties to this Amendment entered into that certain
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 31, 1996, which was amended pursuant to
that certain Amendment of Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1999
(collectively, the "Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and Jolas desire to enter into this Amendment in
order to reflect an increase in Jolas' base salary and to make certain other
amendments;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1. The Employment Agreement is hereby amended to delete the existing
Section 3.1 and to add the following as a new Section 3.1:

         "Section 3.1 SALARY. For the performance of Jolas' duties hereunder,
         the Company shall pay Jolas an annual salary of $210,000, payable (less
         required withholdings) no less frequently than every two weeks."

         2. For purposes of delivering notice to the Company, the address that
should be inserted into Section 6.8 should be as follows:

         "Radiologix, Inc.
          3600 Chase Tower, 2200 Ross Avenue
          Dallas, Texas 75201-2776."


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this
Amendment effective as of the date first written above.

                                            RADIOLOGIX, INC.


                                            By: /s/  MARK L. WAGAR
                                               ------------------------
                                                Mark L. Wagar
                                                Chairman and CEO


                                            JOLAS:


                                            By: /s/  PAUL M. JOLAS
                                               ------------------------
                                                Paul M. Jolas
Exhibit 10.21
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE  RECEIVABLES FINANCING AGREEMENT
 Amendment Borrower Servicer Lender BMO CM Administrator Collateral Agent BMO Liquidity Agent Receivables Financing Agreement
   Amendments
 Aggregate Collection Rate Applicable Percentage Collection Rate Interest Adjustment Date
 Asta Guaranties Asta
 Asta
Guaranties




---



##### 



Borrower Action
 Borrower Action
 Borrowing Base
 Borrowing Base
 Borrowing Base Deficit
 Borrowing Base Deficit
 Executive Officer
 Executive Officer
 Guarantor Security Agreements
 Guarantor Security Agreements
 Stated Maturity Date
 Stated Maturity Date provided however Section
10.2 provided further Section
10.2
 2




---



##### 



Pledged Note
 Pledged Note
 Transaction Documents
    Financial Advisor
   Incurrence of Indebtedness.
 3




---



##### 



Borrowing Base Deficit
   Average Monthly Payments Section 4.2(b) clause fourth
 Receivables Financing Agreement in Full Force and Effect as Amended
  Miscellaneous
   4




---



##### 



i.
    
    the Administrator shall have received
counterparts of this Amendment, duly executed by all parties hereto;ii.
    
    the execution and delivery of the Asta
Guaranties and the Guarantor Security Agreements by all parties
thereto;iii.
    
    the delivery of (a) the Pledged Note to the
Collateral Agent and (b) opinions in connection with this Amendment and
related documents in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the
Collateral Agent; andiv.
    
    the Borrower shall have reimbursed the
Administrator for all its reasonable documented out-of-pocket costs and
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the preparation and
delivery of this Amendment, including, without limitation, the fees and
disbursements of counsel to the Administrator.
      5




---



##### 



Potential Breaches
  6




---



##### 



PALISADES ACQUISITION XVI, LLC,
as BorrowerBy:
    /s/ Gary SternName:
    Gary SternTitle:
    Manager Signature Page to Fourth Amendment




---



##### 



BMO CAPITAL MARKET CORP.,
as Administrator and as Collateral AgentBy:

/s/
John PappanoName:
    John PappanoTitle:
    Managing Director Signature Page to Fourth Amendment




---



##### 



FAIRWAY FINANCE COMPANY, LLC,
as LenderBy:

/s/
Phillip A. MartoneName:
    Phillip A. MartoneTitle:
    Vice President Signature Page to Fourth Amendment




---



##### 



PALISADES COLLECTION, L.L.C.,
as ServicerBy:
    /s/ Gary SternName:
    Gary SternTitle:
    Manager Signature Page to Fourth Amendment




---



##### 



BANK OF MONTREAL, as Liquidity AgentBy:

/s/
John PappanoName:
    John PappanoTitle:
    Managing Director Signature Page to Fourth Amendment
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research: Logan, UT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Logan, Utah Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research Docs







Businessheadline bar ARS continually looks for opportunities to partner with private sector businesses, other federal agencies, state and local governments, universities, and its customers.  These partnerships are designed to augment research programs, expedite research results to the private sector, exchange information and knowledge, stimulate new business and economic development, enhance U.S. trade, preserve the environment, and improve the quality of life for all Americans. Current Programs and Projects*(opens in a new window)*


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# Official Journal C 15/21 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 15 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5221 January 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 15

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5221 January 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2009/C 015/01 | Report on budgetary and financial management in 2007 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Court of Justice

2009/C 015/01

Report on budgetary and financial management in 2007

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2009/C 015/02 | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2009/C 015/02

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
‘Minure Order Torm (06:97)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Sancof inl tde | oan B. Gotschall | ier Or
CASE NUMBER 01 C 3871 DATE 12/5/2003
CASE James Morgan vs. Bill Kay Chrysler Plymouth
TITLE
[In the following box (a) indicace the party filing the motion, ¢.g., plaintiff, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, und (b) stale briefly the
MOTION: nature of the motion being presented.)
Plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the award of attorney’s fees
DOCKET ENTRY:
qa) Oo Filed motion of [ use listing in “Motion” box above.]
(2) a Brief in support of motion due
(3) a Answer brief to motion duc___-_- Reply to answer brief due
(4) 0 Ruling/Hearing on set for at.
(5) a Status hearing[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for] on set for at
(6) Oo Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set for] on setfor at.
(7) ia] Trial[set for/re-set for] on ____at
(8) a [Bench/Jury trial] {1earing] held/continucd to at
(9) a This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costs[by/agreement/pursuant to]
OFRCP4(m) OLocal Rule 41.1 O FRCP41(a)(1) O FRCP41{a)(2).
(10) (Other docket entry] For the reasons stated on the reverse side of this minute order, plaintiff's motion
to reconsider the award of attorncy’s fees [25-1] is denied.
dl [For further detail see order on the reverse side of the original minute order.]

No notices required, advised in open court.

No notices required,

Notices mailed hy judge's staff.

Notified counsel by telephone.

\ Docketing to mail notices,
Mail AQ 450 form.

Copy to judge/magistrate judge.

courtroom
depuly's
ZL LL initials

7 Laisa sn
sunod S310

Los WY S- Jad eU

Patcs Wa ain bn OO

Document
Number

number af neives

U batbetbe Pectived in

gentral Clerk's Office

DEC y f°

date docketed

docketing ld,

ualing deputy invils



Reverse Side of 12/5/03 Minute Order
01 C 3871
James Morgan y. Bill Kay Chrysler Plymouth

In its order of September 19, 2003, the court awarded plaintiff James Morgan $1,705 in
attorneys fees after plaintiff prevailed at arbitration on his claim that defendant sold him a car
with a fraudulent odometer reading. Plaintiff now asks the court to reconsider iis award to the
extent that any part of it was based on the written notice requirement of the Illinois Consumer
Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“Consumer Fraud Act”), 815 TLCS § 505/10a(h), as
plaintiff asserts that at least one Illinois court has held that portion of the Consumer Fraud Act
unconstitutional. See Allen V. Woodfield Chevrolet, Inc., No. 1-01-3131, 2002 WL 1402017 (IIL.
App. Ct. June 28, 2002). A review of this court’s original order, however, reveals that the court
did not rely on the Consumer Fraud Act’s written notice requirement in calculating plaintiff's fee
award. In fact, the court in footnote 4 specifically stated that it would, in exercising its discretion
to award fees under the Act, reach the same result whether the communications between plaintiff
and defendant were in writing or not. Plaintiff has advanced no other reasons for the court to

reconsider its award, and the court finds none of its own; plaintiffs motion to reconsider is

therefore denied.