alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research: Fort Pierce, FL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    USDA Links
                        USDA Main Page
                                    ARS Main PageSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Fort Pierce, Florida U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory Citrus and Other Subtropical Products Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- ARS News Articles
- Research Projects
- Publications

Jinhe  Bai
                     

                     Research Plant Physiologist


                     Phone: (772) 462-5880
                     
                     

                     Fax: (772) 462-5986
                     

                     2001 SOUTH ROCK ROAD                              
                     
                     

                     FORT PIERCE                   , FL 34945


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 29, 2021

No. 04-19-00575-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF CARLOS AGUILAR, DECEASED,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PB4-000048-L2

Honorable Victor Villarreal, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On March 26, 2021, the parties filed a “Joint Motion Pursuant to Settlement” in which 

they assert they settled the dispute that is the subject of this appeal and they filed an Agreed 

Order with the probate court. The parties ask this court to abate the appeal, remand the cause to 

the trial court to effectuate the agreement, and order each party to bear their own costs of appeal.

The motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

This cause is REMANDED to the trial court to allow the court to effectuate the parties’ 

agreement as reflected in their executed Agree Order. This appeal is ABATED pending further 

order of this court. The parties are ordered to file, no later than April 28, 2021, (1) a motion to 

dismiss this appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 or (2) a letter 

informing this court of the status of the case before the trial court. 

The parties’ request to order costs assessed against the party that incurred them is 

DENIED without prejudice to the parties requesting the same relief upon dismissal of this 

appeal.

It is so ORDERED March 29, 2021.
PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00080-CV

THOMAS GEORGE CRAAYBEEK,

Appellant

V.

MARILYN BRAUNE CRAAYBEEK, 

Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 90th District Court

of Young County (33086)

May 6, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         -------------------------------

          We consent to the reference to our firm in Item 6 to the financial
data table and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-4 Nos. 333-67981, as amended as of March 22, 1999 and No. 333-28391) of
IDX Systems Corporation; the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 333-31047,
333-64028, 333-88464) pertaining to the 1985 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the
1994 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Director Stock Option Plan, the 1995
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, the restricted stock
agreement, the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors, and
non-statutory stock options granted to directors and officers of IDX Systems
Corporation; the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-31045) pertaining to
the PHAMIS, Inc. Amended and Restated 1983 Combined Nonqualified and Incentive
Stock Option Plan, the PHAMIS, Inc. 1993 Combined Incentive and Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan as amended through May 14, 1996, the PHAMIS, Inc. 1994
Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan as amended through January 1, 1996, the
PHAMIS, Inc. Salary Savings and Deferral Plan and Trust as amended through
February 22, 1996 and the PHAMIS, Inc. Cain Option Agreement; of our report
dated January 31, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of IDX Systems Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                         ---------------------------------------

Boston, Massachusetts
Dated: March 25, 2003
# C_2006108EN.01001902.xml

| 6.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/19

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006 — Athinaiki Oikogenaiki Artopoiia v OHIM

(Case T-35/04) (1)

1

(‘Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Earlier word mark FERRERO - Application for Community figurative trade mark containing the verbal element “FERRÓ” - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94’)

(2006/C 108/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties:

Applicant: Athinaiki Oikogenaiki Artopoiia AVEE (Pikermi, Greece) (represented by: C. Chrissanthis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Ferrero OHG mbH (Stadtallendorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Schaeffer, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Action

brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 December 2003 (Case R 460/2002-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Athinaiki Oikogeniaki Artopoiia AVEE and Ferrero OHG mbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs);

| 3. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, of 17.4.2004.

1

---
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1729
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:1730
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:1731
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:1732
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:1733
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:1734
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:1735
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:1736
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:1737
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:1738
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:1739
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:1740
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 326-8 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:1741
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133176 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133176 

 COA: 274040 

Iosco CC: 02-004331-FH; 

02-004332-FH 

ROBERT LEROY HOUGHTALING,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case to the trial court for preparation of a corrected 

presentence report that omits the information that the defendant successfully challenged, 

as required by MCR 6.425(E)(2). 

p0613 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 20, 2007 

 Clerk
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Great Basin Rangelands Research: Reno, NV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Newsletter
                        Volume 1
                                    Volume 2Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Reno, Nevada Great Basin Rangelands Research Rangeland Rehabilitation Lab Rehab poster WSWS







Researchheadline bar  Western Society of Weed Science Posters  The Use of Goat Grazing to Biologically SuppressPerenialPepperweed The Effects of Downy Brome Invasion on Mule DeerHabitats Returning Succession to Downy Brome DominatedRangelands Population Level Response of Downy Brome to Soil GrowingMedium Phenology of Exotic Invasive Weeds Associated with DownyBrome Downy Brome SeedEcology DiorhabdaCarinulataand Tamarisk Control


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-40241 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee

v. JOSE ALBERTO RIOS, Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:10-CR-113-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Alberto Rios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rios has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r l e ave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Janu ary2, 201 3 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-40241 Document: 00512097967 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2013

### No. 12-40241

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H 

### C I R 

### . R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-40241 Document: 00512097967 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2013
# Official Journal C 77/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 77 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6011 March 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 77

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6011 March 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 77/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8386 — Advent/Bain Capital/Concardis) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 77/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8386 — Advent/Bain Capital/Concardis) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 77/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 77/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 77/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8370 — Amundi Immobilier/Malakoff Médéric/TAS Kapstadtring 2) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2017/C 77/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8419 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/Target assets) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 77/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8370 — Amundi Immobilier/Malakoff Médéric/TAS Kapstadtring 2) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2017/C 77/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8419 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/Target assets) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 273/15 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 273 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6515 July 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 273

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6515 July 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 273/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 273/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 11 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 273/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 273/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

(2004/C 78 E/0445)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2779/03

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(17 September 2003)

Subject:   Increase in the volume of mail and freight transported by rail in Germany and measures to promote a similar increase in other Member States

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(4 November 2003)

The Commission monitors closely the situation of the railway market as prescribed by Directive 2001/12/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways (1). It welcomes the success stories like the one mentioned by the Honourable Member, as it regrets decisions of railway undertakings to discontinue services such as international passenger services or postal services. Recent success stories in freight are due to major changes which occurred in the approach by the railway undertakings of the freight market, now acting with a view of the global transport chain and as a business. This is the reason why the Commission pursues a policy of modernising the regulatory framework to enable railway undertakings to provide competitive national and international rail freight services. The Commission is satisfied to see this policy to bear fruit in some Member States and particularly in those having already created new competitive conditions like Germany and the Netherlands.

It seems to be a logical consequence of current demand patterns and customer requirements that railway undertakings develop European business strategies that integrate logistical services in the transport offer to the customers. It is their primary responsibility.

The Commission may only support this development through the establishment of a common European regulatory framework for non-discriminatory market access, safety rules and interoperability requirements. Additionally, Community funds contribute to the development of rail infrastructure needed to provide competitive and customer-oriented rail services, particularly on the trans-European rail network.

----

(1)OJ L 75, 15.3.2001.

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

The undersigned, Randall Letcavage, herebycertifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a)	the quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of Premier Holding Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)	information containedin the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avant Diagnostics,Inc.

 

By: */s/ Randall Letcavage	*

Randall Letcavage

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: November 23, 2015
# L_2008348EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 348/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 348/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Henry Vargas, Appellant, v State of New York Department of Corrections, Superintendent Ekpe D. Ekpe, Respondent.

[946 NYS2d 921]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Hugh A. Gilbert, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Scudder, P.J., Carni, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.