# Official Journal C 134/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.134.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 134 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5322 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.134.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 134

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5322 May 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2010/C 134/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 113, 1.5.2010 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2010/C 134/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 113, 1.5.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2010/C 134/02 | Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Google France, Google, Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier (C-236/08), Viaticum SA, Luteciel SARL (C-237/08), Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL, Pierre-Alexis Thonet, Bruno Raboin, Tiger SARL (C-238/08) (Trade marks — Internet — Search engine — Keyword advertising — Display, on the basis of keywords corresponding to trade marks, of links to sites of competitors of the proprietors of those marks or to sites offering imitation goods — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5 — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 9 — Liability of the search engine operator — Directive 2000/31/EC (‘Directive on electronic commerce’)) | 2 |
| 2010/C 134/03 | Case C-278/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Die BergSpechte Outdoor Reisen und Alpinschule Edi Koblmüller GmbH v Günter Guni, trekking.at Reisen GmbH (Trade marks — Internet — Keyword advertising — Display, on the basis of keywords which are identical with or similar to trade marks, of links to sites of competitors of the proprietors of those trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5(1)) | 3 |
| 2010/C 134/04 | Joined Cases C-317/08 to C-320/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Ischia — Italy) — Rosalba Alassini (C-317/08) and Filomena Califano v Wind SpA (C-318/08) and Lucia Anna Giorgia Iacono v Telecom Italia SpA (C-319/08) and Multiservice Srl v Telecom Italia SpA (C-320/08) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principle of effective judicial protection — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/22/EC — Universal Service — Disputes between end users and providers — Mandatory to attempt an out-of-court settlement) | 3 |
| 2010/C 134/05 | Case C-325/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Olympique Lyonnais SASP v Olivier Bernard, Newcastle United FC (Article 39 EC — Freedom of movement for workers — Restriction — Professional football players — Obligation to sign the first professional contract with the club which provided the training — Player ordered to pay damages for infringement of that obligation — Justification — Objective of encouraging the recruitment and training of young professional players) | 4 |
| 2010/C 134/06 | Case C-392/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 96/82/EC — Control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances — Article 11(1)(c) — Obligation to draw up external emergency plans — Time-limit) | 5 |
| 2010/C 134/07 | Case C-414/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — Sviluppo Italia Basilicata SpA v European Commission (Appeal — European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Reduction of financial assistance — General allocation for the purpose of implementing measures to support small and medium-sized enterprises — Deadline for completion of investment projects — Discretion of the Commission) | 5 |
| 2010/C 134/08 | Case C-419/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 — Trubowest Handel GmbH, Viktor Makarov v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Regulation (EC) No 2320/97 imposing anti-dumping duties on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes — Non-contractual liability — Damage — Causal link) | 6 |
| 2010/C 134/09 | Case C-440/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — F. Gielen v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Direct taxation — Article 43 EC — Non-resident taxable person — Business operator — Right to a self-employed person’s deduction — Hours test — Discrimination between resident and non-resident taxable persons — Option to be treated as a resident taxable person) | 6 |
| 2010/C 134/10 | Case C-451/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Helmut Müller GmbH v Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben (Procedures for the award of public works contracts — Public works contracts — Concept — Sale by a public body of land on which the purchaser intends subsequently to carry out works — Works corresponding to a municipal authority’s urban-planning objectives) | 7 |
| 2010/C 134/11 | Case C-3/09: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Erotic Center BVBA v Belgische Staat (Sixth VAT Directive — Article 12(3)(a) — Annexe H — Reduced rate of VAT — Concept of admissions to a cinema — Individual cubicles for watching films on demand) | 7 |
| 2010/C 134/12 | Case C-79/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 13 and 132 — Bodies governed by public law — Capacity as public authorities — Activities — Treatment as non-taxable persons — Exemptions — Socio-cultural, health and education sectors — ‘Euroregions’ — Promotion of work mobility — Making available of personnel — Burden of proof) | 8 |
| 2010/C 134/13 | Case C-218/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium)) — SGS Belgium NV, Firme Derwa NV, Centraal Beheer Achmea NV v Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau, Firme Derwa NV, Centraal Beheer Achmea NV, SGS Belgium NV, Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 — Export refunds — Article 5(3) — Conditions for granting — Exception — Force majeure — Products which perished in transit) | 8 |
| 2010/C 134/14 | Case C-55/08: Order of the Court of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Portugal)) — Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa v Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional, Bwin International Ltd, formerly Baw International Ltd, Betandwin.Com Interactive Entertainment (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Inadmissibility) | 9 |
| 2010/C 134/15 | Case C-432/08 P: Order of the Court of 9 December 2009 — Luigi Marcuccio v European Commission (Appeal — Officials — Social security — Payment of medical expenses — Implied rejection of the application seeking reimbursement in full of medical expenses incurred by the applicant — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded) | 9 |
| 2010/C 134/16 | Joined Cases C-478/08 and C-479/08: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Sicilia — Italy) — Buzzi Unicem SpA and Others (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — ‘Polluter pays’ principle — Directive 2004/35/EC — Environmental liability — Applicability ratione temporis — Pollution occurring before the date laid down for implementation of that directive and continuing after that date — National legislation imposing liability on a number of undertakings for the costs of remedying the damage connected with such pollution — Requirement for fault or negligence — Requirement for a causal link — Remedial measures — Duty to consult the undertakings concerned — Annex II to the directive) | 10 |
| 2010/C 134/17 | Case C-23/09 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2010 — ecoblue AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Earlier mark BLUE — Word sign ‘Ecoblue’ — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs) | 11 |
| 2010/C 134/18 | Case C-24/09: Order of the Court of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden)) — Djurgården-Lilla Värtans Miljöskyddsförening v AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholms stad (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Directive 85/337/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment — Directive 96/61 — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Public participation in the decision-making process for environmental matters — Right of appeal against decisions authorising projects liable to have significant effects on the environment) | 12 |
| 2010/C 134/19 | Case C-43/09 P: Order of the Court of 22 January 2010 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission (Appeal — Commission Decision reducing the financial assistance initially granted by the Cohesion Fund for the project for the project for the new Athens International Airport at Spata — Action for annulment — Principles of non-retroactivity, legal certainty and proportionality — Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part) | 13 |
| 2010/C 134/20 | Case C-68/09 P: Order of the Court of 29 January 2010 — Georgios Karatzoglou v European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR), European Commission, successor in law to the EAR (Appeals — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Civil service — Temporary staff contract for an indefinite period — Termination) | 13 |
| 2010/C 134/21 | Case C-150/09 P: Order of the Court of 21 January 2010 — Iride SpA, Iride Energia SpA v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Aid declared compatible with the common market on condition that its recipient repays earlier aid declared unlawful — Compatibility with Article 87(1) EC — Errors of law — Distortion of the appellants’ arguments — Failure to state grounds — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded) | 14 |
| 2010/C 134/22 | Case C-408/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Município de Barcelos (Portugal) lodged on 23 October 2009 — Município de Barcelos v Portuguese State | 14 |
| 2010/C 134/23 | Case C-509/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof, Germany lodged on 9 December 2009 — eDate Advertising GmbH v X | 14 |
| 2010/C 134/24 | Case C-20/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trani (Italy) lodged on 13 January 2010 — Vino Cosimo Damiano v Poste Italiane SpA | 15 |
| 2010/C 134/25 | Case C-76/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regional Court in Prešov (Slovak Republic) lodged on 9 February 2010 — Pohotovosť s.r.o. v Iveta Korčkovská | 16 |
| 2010/C 134/26 | Case C-85/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo, Spain lodged on 12 February 2010 — Telefónica Móviles España S.A. v Administración del Estado (Secretaría de Estado de Telecomunicaciones) | 17 |
| 2010/C 134/27 | Case C-93/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2010 — Finanzamt Essen-NordOst v GFKL Financial Services AG | 18 |
| 2010/C 134/28 | Case C-101/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberste Berufungs- und Disziplinarkommission (Austria) lodged on 23 February 2010 — Gentcho Pavlov and Gregor Famira v Ausschuss der Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien | 18 |
| 2010/C 134/29 | Case C-104/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Ireland made on 24 February 2010 — Patrick Kelly v National University of Ireland | 19 |
| 2010/C 134/30 | Case C-107/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 25 February 2010 — Enel Maritsa Iztok 3 v Director of the Office ‘Appeals and the Administration of Enforcement’ at the Central Administration of the National Revenue Agency | 20 |
| 2010/C 134/31 | Case C-108/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Venezia (Italy) lodged on 26 February 2010 — Ivana Scattolon v Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca | 21 |
| 2010/C 134/32 | Case C-113/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgerichts Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 2 March 2010 — Zuckerfabrik Jülich AG v Hauptzollamt Aachen | 21 |
| 2010/C 134/33 | Case C-114/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, Brussels lodged on 3 March 2010 — Belpolis Benelux SA v Belgische Staat | 22 |
| 2010/C 134/34 | Case C-115/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővarosí Bíróság lodged on 3 March 2010 — Bábolna Mezőgazdagasági Termelő és Fejlesztő Kereskedelmi Zrt v Mezőgazdagasági és Fejlesztő és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve | 22 |
| 2010/C 134/35 | Case C-119/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 4 March 2010 — Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH | 23 |
| 2010/C 134/36 | Case C-121/10: Action brought on 5 March 2010 — European Commission v Council of the European Union | 24 |
| 2010/C 134/37 | Case C-126/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 10 March 2010 — FOGGIA — Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA v Secretário de Estado dos Assuntos Fiscais | 25 |
| 2010/C 134/38 | Case C-128/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 11 March 2010 — Navtiliaki Etairia Thasou AE v Ipourgos Emborikis Navtilias | 25 |
| 2010/C 134/39 | Case C-129/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 11 March 2010 — Amalthia I Navtiki Etairia v Ipourgos Emborikis Nautilias | 26 |
| 2010/C 134/40 | Case C-130/10: Action brought on 11 March 2010 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union | 26 |
| 2010/C 134/41 | Case C-132/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Leuven (Belgium) lodged on 15 March 2010 — 1. Olivier Paul Louis Halley, 2. Julie Jacqueline Marthe Marie Halley and 3. Marie Joëlle Armel Halley v Belgische Staat | 27 |
| 2010/C 134/42 | Case C-135/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Appello di Torino (Italy), lodged on 15 March 2010 — SCF Consorzio Fonografici v Marco Del Corso | 27 |
| 2010/C 134/43 | Case C-139/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, lodged on 17 March 2010 — Prism Investments BV v J.A. van der Meer, in his capacity as receiver in the liquidation of Arilco Holland BV | 28 |
| 2010/C 134/44 | Case C-316/08: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 23 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione — Italy) — Latex Srl v Agenzie delle Entrate, Amministrazione Dell’Economia e delle Finanze | 28 |
| 2010/C 134/45 | Case C-290/09: Order of the President of the Court of 23 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo per la Sardegna — Italy) — Telecom Italia SpA v Regione autonoma della Sardegna, opposing Space SpA and Passamonti Srl and Others | 28 |
| 2010/C 134/46 | Joined Cases C-364/09 P and 365/09 P: Order of the President of the Court of 10 February 2010 — Mineralbrunnen Rhöne-Sprudel Egon Schindel GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Schwarzbräu GmbH | 28 |
| | General Court |
| 2010/C 134/47 | Case T-50/05: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Public service contracts — Community tendering procedure — Provision of computer services relating to telematic systems to control the movement of products subject to excise duty — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Action for annulment — Consortium of tenderers — Admissibility — Principles of equal treatment of tenderers and transparency — Award criteria — Principles of sound administration and diligence — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Manifest error of assessment) | 29 |
| 2010/C 134/48 | Case T-42/06: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2010 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Privileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision not to defend his privileges and immunities — Action for annulment — No longer any interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — Conduct alleged against the Parliament — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Causal link) | 29 |
| 2010/C 134/49 | Case T-338/07 P: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2010 — Bianchi v ETF (Appeal — Staff case — Temporary staff — Contract for a fixed period — Decision refusing to renew the contract — Article 47(b) of the CEOS) | 30 |
| 2010/C 134/50 | Case T-427/07: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2010 — Mirto Corporación Empresarial v OHIM — Maglificio Barbara (Mirtillino) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Mirtillino — Earlier Community word mark MIRTO — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 30 |
| 2010/C 134/51 | Joined Cases T-5/08 to T-7/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2010 — Nestlé v OHIM — Master Beverage Industries (Golden Eagle and Golden Eagle Deluxe) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community marks Golden Eagle and Golden Eagle Deluxe — Earlier international and national figurative marks representing a mug and coffee beans — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 31 |
| 2010/C 134/52 | Case T-363/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — 2nine v OHIM — Pacific Sunwear of California (nollie) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark nollie — Earlier national and international word marks NOLI — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 31 |
| 2010/C 134/53 | Case T-364/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — 2nine v OHIM — Pacific Sunwear of California (nollie) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark nollie — Earlier national and international word marks NOLI — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 32 |
| 2010/C 134/54 | Case T-423/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Inter-Nett 2000 v OHIM — Unión de Agricoltores (HUNAGRO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark HUNAGRO — Earlier Community figurative mark UNIAGRO — Partial refusal to register — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12 (a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12 (a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 32 |
| 2010/C 134/55 | Case T-577/08: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Proges v Commission (Public service contracts — Community tendering procedure — Programme for creation of land use models — Rejection of tenderer’s bid — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Award criteria) | 33 |
| 2010/C 134/56 | Case T-130/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Eliza v OHIM — Went Computing Consultancy Group (eliza) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark incorporating the word eliza — Earlier Community word mark ELISE — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Refusal of registration — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 33 |
| 2010/C 134/57 | Case T-105/07: Order of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — MarketTools v OHIM — Optimus-Telecomunicações (ZOOMERANG) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate) | 34 |
| 2010/C 134/58 | Case T-516/08: Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Eriksen v Commission (Action for damages — Public health implications of the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland) — Directive 96/29/Euratom — Commission’s failure to adopt measures against a Member State — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 34 |
| 2010/C 134/59 | Case T-5/09: Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Lind v Commission (Action for damages — Public health implications of the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland) — Directive 96/29/Euratom — Commission’s failure to adopt measures against a Member State — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 35 |
| 2010/C 134/60 | Case T-6/09: Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Hansen v European Commission (Action for damages — Public health implications of the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland) — Directive 96/29/Euratom — Commission’s failure to adopt measures against a Member State — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 35 |
| 2010/C 134/61 | Case T-155/09: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2010 — Maxcom v OHIM — Maxdata Computer (maxcom) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate) | 36 |
| 2010/C 134/62 | Case T-1/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — SNF v ECHA (Proceedings for interim measures — REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Application for suspension of operation of the measure and for interim relief — No urgency) | 36 |
| 2010/C 134/63 | Case T-6/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Sviluppo Globale v Commission (Interim measures — Public contracts — Tendering procedure — Rejection of tender — Application for suspension of operation and interim measures — Loss of opportunity — Lack of serious and irreparable harm — Lack of urgency) | 37 |
| 2010/C 134/64 | Case T-16/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Alisei v Commission (Interim measures — Programme establishing a ‘food facility’ intended for developing countries — Call for proposals for the grant of funding — Refusal of funding — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of interest in bringing proceedings — Disregard of formal requirements — Inadmissibility) | 37 |
| 2010/C 134/65 | Case T-104/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Germany v Commission | 37 |
| 2010/C 134/66 | Case T-107/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne v OHIM — Natura Cosméticos (NATURAVIVA) | 38 |
| 2010/C 134/67 | Case T-109/10: Action brought on 5 March 2010 — Luxembourg v Commission | 39 |
| 2010/C 134/68 | Case T-110/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — Insula v Commission | 40 |
| 2010/C 134/69 | Case T-114/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — Germany v Commission | 40 |
| 2010/C 134/70 | Case T-116/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — Germany v Commission | 41 |
| 2010/C 134/71 | Case T-120/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — ClientEarth e.a. v Commission | 42 |
| 2010/C 134/72 | Case T-121/10: Action brought on 11 March 2010 — Conte and Others v Council | 43 |
| 2010/C 134/73 | Case T-123/10: Action brought on 18 March 2010 — Hartmann v OHIM (Complete) | 45 |
| 2010/C 134/74 | Case T-124/10: Action brought on 17 March 2010 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Vinotasia (VITASIA) | 45 |
| 2010/C 134/75 | Case T-130/10: Action brought on 17 March 2010 — Lux Management v OHIM — Zeis Excelsa (KULTE) | 46 |
| 2010/C 134/76 | Case T-135/10: Action brought on 23 March 2010 — Pieno žvaigždės v OHIM — Fattoria Scaldasole (Iogurt.) | 47 |
| 2010/C 134/77 | Case T-138/10: Action brought on 24 March 2010 — Spain v Commission | 47 |
| 2010/C 134/78 | Case T-143/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Ben Ri Electrónica v OHIM — Sacopa (LT LIGHT-THECNO) | 48 |
| 2010/C 134/79 | Case T-144/10: Action brought on 29 March 2010 — Space Beach Club v OHIM — Flores Gómez (SpS space of sound) | 49 |
| 2010/C 134/80 | Case T-303/94: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Jong v Council and Commission | 50 |
| 2010/C 134/81 | Case T-312/08: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2010 — Ellinikos Niognomon v Commission | 50 |
| 2010/C 134/82 | Case T-350/08: Order of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — Papierfabrik Hamburger-Spremberg v Commission | 50 |
| 2010/C 134/83 | Case T-428/09: Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Berenschot Groep v Commission | 50 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2010/C 134/84 | Case F-7/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 23 February 2010 — Faria v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Staff cases — Officials — Reports — Evaluation report — 2006/2007 evaluation period — Application for annulment of the evaluation report — Manifest error of assessment — Compensation for non-material damage) | 51 |
| 2010/C 134/85 | Case F-26/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 March 2010 — N v Parliament (Staff cases — Officials — Action for damages — Admissibility — Psychological harassment — Duty of care — Non-material damage) | 51 |
| 2010/C 134/86 | Case F-33/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 March 2010 — Tzvetanova v Commission (Staff cases — Temporary staff — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Conditions laid down in Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Habitual residence before entering the service — Stay as a student in the place of employment — Training periods outside the place of employment during the reference period — Account taken of actual residence) | 52 |
| 2010/C 134/87 | Case F-47/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — Buschak v EFILWC (Staff cases — European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions — Job description of the post of deputy director — Action for annulment — Action for damages — Interest in bringing proceedings — Manifestly inadmissible) | 52 |
| 2010/C 134/88 | Case F-99/09: Action brought on 8 December 2009 — Papathanasiou v OHIM | 52 |
| 2010/C 134/89 | Case F-13/10: Action brought on 12 February 2010 — Nicola v EIB | 53 |
| 2010/C 134/90 | Case F-14/10: Action brought on 25 February 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission | 54 |
| 2010/C 134/91 | Case F-15/10: Action brought on 26 February 2010 — Andres and Others v ECB | 54 |
| 2010/C 134/92 | Case F-16/10: Action brought on 10 March 2010 — M. Almeida Campos and Others v Council | 55 |
| 2010/C 134/93 | Case F-17/10: Action brought on 15 March 2010 — Daake v OHIM | 56 |
| 2010/C 134/94 | Case F-18/10: Action brought on 18 March 2010 — Capidis v Commission | 56 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2010/C 134/02

Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Google France, Google, Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier (C-236/08), Viaticum SA, Luteciel SARL (C-237/08), Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL, Pierre-Alexis Thonet, Bruno Raboin, Tiger SARL (C-238/08) (Trade marks — Internet — Search engine — Keyword advertising — Display, on the basis of keywords corresponding to trade marks, of links to sites of competitors of the proprietors of those marks or to sites offering imitation goods — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5 — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 9 — Liability of the search engine operator — Directive 2000/31/EC (‘Directive on electronic commerce’))

2

2010/C 134/03

Case C-278/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Die BergSpechte Outdoor Reisen und Alpinschule Edi Koblmüller GmbH v Günter Guni, trekking.at Reisen GmbH (Trade marks — Internet — Keyword advertising — Display, on the basis of keywords which are identical with or similar to trade marks, of links to sites of competitors of the proprietors of those trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5(1))

3

2010/C 134/04

Joined Cases C-317/08 to C-320/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Ischia — Italy) — Rosalba Alassini (C-317/08) and Filomena Califano v Wind SpA (C-318/08) and Lucia Anna Giorgia Iacono v Telecom Italia SpA (C-319/08) and Multiservice Srl v Telecom Italia SpA (C-320/08) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principle of effective judicial protection — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/22/EC — Universal Service — Disputes between end users and providers — Mandatory to attempt an out-of-court settlement)

3

2010/C 134/05

Case C-325/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Olympique Lyonnais SASP v Olivier Bernard, Newcastle United FC (Article 39 EC — Freedom of movement for workers — Restriction — Professional football players — Obligation to sign the first professional contract with the club which provided the training — Player ordered to pay damages for infringement of that obligation — Justification — Objective of encouraging the recruitment and training of young professional players)

4

2010/C 134/06

Case C-392/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 96/82/EC — Control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances — Article 11(1)(c) — Obligation to draw up external emergency plans — Time-limit)

5

2010/C 134/07

Case C-414/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — Sviluppo Italia Basilicata SpA v European Commission (Appeal — European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Reduction of financial assistance — General allocation for the purpose of implementing measures to support small and medium-sized enterprises — Deadline for completion of investment projects — Discretion of the Commission)

5

2010/C 134/08

Case C-419/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 — Trubowest Handel GmbH, Viktor Makarov v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Regulation (EC) No 2320/97 imposing anti-dumping duties on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes — Non-contractual liability — Damage — Causal link)

6

2010/C 134/09

Case C-440/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — F. Gielen v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Direct taxation — Article 43 EC — Non-resident taxable person — Business operator — Right to a self-employed person’s deduction — Hours test — Discrimination between resident and non-resident taxable persons — Option to be treated as a resident taxable person)

6

2010/C 134/10

Case C-451/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Helmut Müller GmbH v Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben (Procedures for the award of public works contracts — Public works contracts — Concept — Sale by a public body of land on which the purchaser intends subsequently to carry out works — Works corresponding to a municipal authority’s urban-planning objectives)

7

2010/C 134/11

Case C-3/09: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Erotic Center BVBA v Belgische Staat (Sixth VAT Directive — Article 12(3)(a) — Annexe H — Reduced rate of VAT — Concept of admissions to a cinema — Individual cubicles for watching films on demand)

7

2010/C 134/12

Case C-79/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 13 and 132 — Bodies governed by public law — Capacity as public authorities — Activities — Treatment as non-taxable persons — Exemptions — Socio-cultural, health and education sectors — ‘Euroregions’ — Promotion of work mobility — Making available of personnel — Burden of proof)

8

2010/C 134/13

Case C-218/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium)) — SGS Belgium NV, Firme Derwa NV, Centraal Beheer Achmea NV v Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau, Firme Derwa NV, Centraal Beheer Achmea NV, SGS Belgium NV, Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 — Export refunds — Article 5(3) — Conditions for granting — Exception — Force majeure — Products which perished in transit)

8

2010/C 134/14

Case C-55/08: Order of the Court of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Portugal)) — Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa v Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional, Bwin International Ltd, formerly Baw International Ltd, Betandwin.Com Interactive Entertainment (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Inadmissibility)

9

2010/C 134/15

Case C-432/08 P: Order of the Court of 9 December 2009 — Luigi Marcuccio v European Commission (Appeal — Officials — Social security — Payment of medical expenses — Implied rejection of the application seeking reimbursement in full of medical expenses incurred by the applicant — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

9

2010/C 134/16

Joined Cases C-478/08 and C-479/08: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Sicilia — Italy) — Buzzi Unicem SpA and Others (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — ‘Polluter pays’ principle — Directive 2004/35/EC — Environmental liability — Applicability ratione temporis — Pollution occurring before the date laid down for implementation of that directive and continuing after that date — National legislation imposing liability on a number of undertakings for the costs of remedying the damage connected with such pollution — Requirement for fault or negligence — Requirement for a causal link — Remedial measures — Duty to consult the undertakings concerned — Annex II to the directive)

10

2010/C 134/17

Case C-23/09 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2010 — ecoblue AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Earlier mark BLUE — Word sign ‘Ecoblue’ — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs)

11

2010/C 134/18

Case C-24/09: Order of the Court of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden)) — Djurgården-Lilla Värtans Miljöskyddsförening v AB Fortum Värme samägt med Stockholms stad (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Directive 85/337/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment — Directive 96/61 — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Public participation in the decision-making process for environmental matters — Right of appeal against decisions authorising projects liable to have significant effects on the environment)

12

2010/C 134/19

Case C-43/09 P: Order of the Court of 22 January 2010 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission (Appeal — Commission Decision reducing the financial assistance initially granted by the Cohesion Fund for the project for the project for the new Athens International Airport at Spata — Action for annulment — Principles of non-retroactivity, legal certainty and proportionality — Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part)

13

2010/C 134/20

Case C-68/09 P: Order of the Court of 29 January 2010 — Georgios Karatzoglou v European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR), European Commission, successor in law to the EAR (Appeals — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Civil service — Temporary staff contract for an indefinite period — Termination)

13

2010/C 134/21

Case C-150/09 P: Order of the Court of 21 January 2010 — Iride SpA, Iride Energia SpA v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Aid declared compatible with the common market on condition that its recipient repays earlier aid declared unlawful — Compatibility with Article 87(1) EC — Errors of law — Distortion of the appellants’ arguments — Failure to state grounds — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

14

2010/C 134/22

Case C-408/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Município de Barcelos (Portugal) lodged on 23 October 2009 — Município de Barcelos v Portuguese State

14

2010/C 134/23

Case C-509/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof, Germany lodged on 9 December 2009 — eDate Advertising GmbH v X

14

2010/C 134/24

Case C-20/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trani (Italy) lodged on 13 January 2010 — Vino Cosimo Damiano v Poste Italiane SpA

15

2010/C 134/25

Case C-76/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regional Court in Prešov (Slovak Republic) lodged on 9 February 2010 — Pohotovosť s.r.o. v Iveta Korčkovská

16

2010/C 134/26

Case C-85/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo, Spain lodged on 12 February 2010 — Telefónica Móviles España S.A. v Administración del Estado (Secretaría de Estado de Telecomunicaciones)

17

2010/C 134/27

Case C-93/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2010 — Finanzamt Essen-NordOst v GFKL Financial Services AG

18

2010/C 134/28

Case C-101/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberste Berufungs- und Disziplinarkommission (Austria) lodged on 23 February 2010 — Gentcho Pavlov and Gregor Famira v Ausschuss der Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien

18

2010/C 134/29

Case C-104/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Ireland made on 24 February 2010 — Patrick Kelly v National University of Ireland

19

2010/C 134/30

Case C-107/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 25 February 2010 — Enel Maritsa Iztok 3 v Director of the Office ‘Appeals and the Administration of Enforcement’ at the Central Administration of the National Revenue Agency

20

2010/C 134/31

Case C-108/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Venezia (Italy) lodged on 26 February 2010 — Ivana Scattolon v Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca

21

2010/C 134/32

Case C-113/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgerichts Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 2 March 2010 — Zuckerfabrik Jülich AG v Hauptzollamt Aachen

21

2010/C 134/33

Case C-114/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, Brussels lodged on 3 March 2010 — Belpolis Benelux SA v Belgische Staat

22

2010/C 134/34

Case C-115/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővarosí Bíróság lodged on 3 March 2010 — Bábolna Mezőgazdagasági Termelő és Fejlesztő Kereskedelmi Zrt v Mezőgazdagasági és Fejlesztő és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve

22

2010/C 134/35

Case C-119/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 4 March 2010 — Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH

23

2010/C 134/36

Case C-121/10: Action brought on 5 March 2010 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

24

2010/C 134/37

Case C-126/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 10 March 2010 — FOGGIA — Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA v Secretário de Estado dos Assuntos Fiscais

25

2010/C 134/38

Case C-128/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 11 March 2010 — Navtiliaki Etairia Thasou AE v Ipourgos Emborikis Navtilias

25

2010/C 134/39

Case C-129/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 11 March 2010 — Amalthia I Navtiki Etairia v Ipourgos Emborikis Nautilias

26

2010/C 134/40

Case C-130/10: Action brought on 11 March 2010 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union

26

2010/C 134/41

Case C-132/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Leuven (Belgium) lodged on 15 March 2010 — 1. Olivier Paul Louis Halley, 2. Julie Jacqueline Marthe Marie Halley and 3. Marie Joëlle Armel Halley v Belgische Staat

27

2010/C 134/42

Case C-135/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Appello di Torino (Italy), lodged on 15 March 2010 — SCF Consorzio Fonografici v Marco Del Corso

27

2010/C 134/43

Case C-139/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, lodged on 17 March 2010 — Prism Investments BV v J.A. van der Meer, in his capacity as receiver in the liquidation of Arilco Holland BV

28

2010/C 134/44

Case C-316/08: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 23 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione — Italy) — Latex Srl v Agenzie delle Entrate, Amministrazione Dell’Economia e delle Finanze

28

2010/C 134/45

Case C-290/09: Order of the President of the Court of 23 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo per la Sardegna — Italy) — Telecom Italia SpA v Regione autonoma della Sardegna, opposing Space SpA and Passamonti Srl and Others

28

2010/C 134/46

Joined Cases C-364/09 P and 365/09 P: Order of the President of the Court of 10 February 2010 — Mineralbrunnen Rhöne-Sprudel Egon Schindel GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Schwarzbräu GmbH

28

General Court

2010/C 134/47

Case T-50/05: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Public service contracts — Community tendering procedure — Provision of computer services relating to telematic systems to control the movement of products subject to excise duty — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Action for annulment — Consortium of tenderers — Admissibility — Principles of equal treatment of tenderers and transparency — Award criteria — Principles of sound administration and diligence — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Manifest error of assessment)

29

2010/C 134/48

Case T-42/06: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2010 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Privileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision not to defend his privileges and immunities — Action for annulment — No longer any interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — Conduct alleged against the Parliament — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Causal link)

29

2010/C 134/49

Case T-338/07 P: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2010 — Bianchi v ETF (Appeal — Staff case — Temporary staff — Contract for a fixed period — Decision refusing to renew the contract — Article 47(b) of the CEOS)

30

2010/C 134/50

Case T-427/07: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2010 — Mirto Corporación Empresarial v OHIM — Maglificio Barbara (Mirtillino) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Mirtillino — Earlier Community word mark MIRTO — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

30

2010/C 134/51

Joined Cases T-5/08 to T-7/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2010 — Nestlé v OHIM — Master Beverage Industries (Golden Eagle and Golden Eagle Deluxe) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community marks Golden Eagle and Golden Eagle Deluxe — Earlier international and national figurative marks representing a mug and coffee beans — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

31

2010/C 134/52

Case T-363/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — 2nine v OHIM — Pacific Sunwear of California (nollie) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark nollie — Earlier national and international word marks NOLI — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))

31

2010/C 134/53

Case T-364/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — 2nine v OHIM — Pacific Sunwear of California (nollie) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark nollie — Earlier national and international word marks NOLI — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))

32

2010/C 134/54

Case T-423/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Inter-Nett 2000 v OHIM — Unión de Agricoltores (HUNAGRO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark HUNAGRO — Earlier Community figurative mark UNIAGRO — Partial refusal to register — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12 (a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12 (a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

32

2010/C 134/55

Case T-577/08: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Proges v Commission (Public service contracts — Community tendering procedure — Programme for creation of land use models — Rejection of tenderer’s bid — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Award criteria)

33

2010/C 134/56

Case T-130/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Eliza v OHIM — Went Computing Consultancy Group (eliza) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark incorporating the word eliza — Earlier Community word mark ELISE — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Refusal of registration — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

33

2010/C 134/57

Case T-105/07: Order of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — MarketTools v OHIM — Optimus-Telecomunicações (ZOOMERANG) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

34

2010/C 134/58

Case T-516/08: Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Eriksen v Commission (Action for damages — Public health implications of the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland) — Directive 96/29/Euratom — Commission’s failure to adopt measures against a Member State — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

34

2010/C 134/59

Case T-5/09: Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Lind v Commission (Action for damages — Public health implications of the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland) — Directive 96/29/Euratom — Commission’s failure to adopt measures against a Member State — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

35

2010/C 134/60

Case T-6/09: Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Hansen v European Commission (Action for damages — Public health implications of the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland) — Directive 96/29/Euratom — Commission’s failure to adopt measures against a Member State — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

35

2010/C 134/61

Case T-155/09: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2010 — Maxcom v OHIM — Maxdata Computer (maxcom) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)

36

2010/C 134/62

Case T-1/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — SNF v ECHA (Proceedings for interim measures — REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Application for suspension of operation of the measure and for interim relief — No urgency)

36

2010/C 134/63

Case T-6/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Sviluppo Globale v Commission (Interim measures — Public contracts — Tendering procedure — Rejection of tender — Application for suspension of operation and interim measures — Loss of opportunity — Lack of serious and irreparable harm — Lack of urgency)

37

2010/C 134/64

Case T-16/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Alisei v Commission (Interim measures — Programme establishing a ‘food facility’ intended for developing countries — Call for proposals for the grant of funding — Refusal of funding — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of interest in bringing proceedings — Disregard of formal requirements — Inadmissibility)

37

2010/C 134/65

Case T-104/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Germany v Commission

37

2010/C 134/66

Case T-107/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne v OHIM — Natura Cosméticos (NATURAVIVA)

38

2010/C 134/67

Case T-109/10: Action brought on 5 March 2010 — Luxembourg v Commission

39

2010/C 134/68

Case T-110/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — Insula v Commission

40

2010/C 134/69

Case T-114/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — Germany v Commission

40

2010/C 134/70

Case T-116/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — Germany v Commission

41

2010/C 134/71

Case T-120/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — ClientEarth e.a. v Commission

42

2010/C 134/72

Case T-121/10: Action brought on 11 March 2010 — Conte and Others v Council

43

2010/C 134/73

Case T-123/10: Action brought on 18 March 2010 — Hartmann v OHIM (Complete)

45

2010/C 134/74

Case T-124/10: Action brought on 17 March 2010 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Vinotasia (VITASIA)

45

2010/C 134/75

Case T-130/10: Action brought on 17 March 2010 — Lux Management v OHIM — Zeis Excelsa (KULTE)

46

2010/C 134/76

Case T-135/10: Action brought on 23 March 2010 — Pieno žvaigždės v OHIM — Fattoria Scaldasole (Iogurt.)

47

2010/C 134/77

Case T-138/10: Action brought on 24 March 2010 — Spain v Commission

47

2010/C 134/78

Case T-143/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Ben Ri Electrónica v OHIM — Sacopa (LT LIGHT-THECNO)

48

2010/C 134/79

Case T-144/10: Action brought on 29 March 2010 — Space Beach Club v OHIM — Flores Gómez (SpS space of sound)

49

2010/C 134/80

Case T-303/94: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Jong v Council and Commission

50

2010/C 134/81

Case T-312/08: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2010 — Ellinikos Niognomon v Commission

50

2010/C 134/82

Case T-350/08: Order of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — Papierfabrik Hamburger-Spremberg v Commission

50

2010/C 134/83

Case T-428/09: Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Berenschot Groep v Commission

50

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2010/C 134/84

Case F-7/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 23 February 2010 — Faria v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Staff cases — Officials — Reports — Evaluation report — 2006/2007 evaluation period — Application for annulment of the evaluation report — Manifest error of assessment — Compensation for non-material damage)

51

2010/C 134/85

Case F-26/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 March 2010 — N v Parliament (Staff cases — Officials — Action for damages — Admissibility — Psychological harassment — Duty of care — Non-material damage)

51

2010/C 134/86

Case F-33/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 March 2010 — Tzvetanova v Commission (Staff cases — Temporary staff — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Conditions laid down in Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Habitual residence before entering the service — Stay as a student in the place of employment — Training periods outside the place of employment during the reference period — Account taken of actual residence)

52

2010/C 134/87

Case F-47/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — Buschak v EFILWC (Staff cases — European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions — Job description of the post of deputy director — Action for annulment — Action for damages — Interest in bringing proceedings — Manifestly inadmissible)

52

2010/C 134/88

Case F-99/09: Action brought on 8 December 2009 — Papathanasiou v OHIM

52

2010/C 134/89

Case F-13/10: Action brought on 12 February 2010 — Nicola v EIB

53

2010/C 134/90

Case F-14/10: Action brought on 25 February 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission

54

2010/C 134/91

Case F-15/10: Action brought on 26 February 2010 — Andres and Others v ECB

54

2010/C 134/92

Case F-16/10: Action brought on 10 March 2010 — M. Almeida Campos and Others v Council

55

2010/C 134/93

Case F-17/10: Action brought on 15 March 2010 — Daake v OHIM

56

2010/C 134/94

Case F-18/10: Action brought on 18 March 2010 — Capidis v Commission

56

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN