alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 41959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16648]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB294]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Spiny Dogfish 
Advisory Panel will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, August 19, 2021, from 10 
a.m. to 1 p.m. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Webinar connection 
information will be available at: https://www.mafmc.org/council-events.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331 or 
on their website at www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is for the 
Advisory Panel to create a Fishery Performance Report including advisor 
input on related specifications and management measures.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Shelley Kimbel-Spedden at the Council Office, 
(302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

(Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.)

    Dated: July 30, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-16648 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Synovics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jyotindra Gange, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: September 15, 2008

 

| By:    | /s/ Jyotindra Gange                        |   |   |        |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |                                            |   |   |   |
|   | Jyotindra GangePrincipal Executive Officer |   |   |   |

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synovics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Synovics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

----
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Databases
                        Alfalfa Transcription Factor Database
                                    iPhyClassifier - Phytoplasma Sequence ClassificationSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Publications
- Research Projects
- ARS News Articles
- *Spiroplasma kunkelii* genome sequencing project
- Vinca
- Aster Yellows Epidemic
- RFLP
- Healthy and Diseased
- Poinsettia

Ing Ming  Lee
                     

                     Research Plant Pathologist


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1670** 

KIRBY BARNES , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
SMITHFIELD FOODS , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. ( 2:14

- cv - 00080

- RBS

- LRL )

Submitted : October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kirby Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Kurt George Larkin, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kirby Barnes appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failing to serve the Defendant, Smithfield Foods, within 120 days of filing the complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). On appeal, we confine our review t o the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Barnes ’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Barnes has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly , although we g rant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 115A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.115.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 115A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5623 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.115.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 115A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5623 April 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 115A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fourth supplement to the 31st complete edition | 1 |
| 2013/C 115A/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — third supplement to the 31st complete edition | 21 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 115A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fourth supplement to the 31st complete edition

1

2013/C 115A/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — third supplement to the 31st complete edition

21

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"),  hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

_  _/s/ James N. Ryan                                

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 12, 2003
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 12

- 00945

- CV
LEE A. HAR DY AND POLLY HARDY , Appellant s V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. , Appellee Appeal from the 157th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011

- 07737 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on September 5, 2012. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the portion of the trial court’s judgment ordering that the appellants take nothing against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. with respect to the appellants’ wrongful foreclosure claim. Accordingly, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment with respect to the appellants’ wrong ful foreclosure claim against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and remands the case to the trial court for further proceedings with respect to this claim only

.
The Court orders that the appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders th at this decision be certified below for observance.Judgment rendered December 30, 2014.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown. Opinion delivered by Justice Sharp.

y
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 1 of 30 PageID #:7043
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 2 of 30 PageID #:7044
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 3 of 30 PageID #:7045
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 4 of 30 PageID #:7046
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 5 of 30 PageID #:7047
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 6 of 30 PageID #:7048
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 7 of 30 PageID #:7049
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 8 of 30 PageID #:7050
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 9 of 30 PageID #:7051
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 10 of 30 PageID #:7052
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 11 of 30 PageID #:7053
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 12 of 30 PageID #:7054
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 13 of 30 PageID #:7055
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 14 of 30 PageID #:7056
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 15 of 30 PageID #:7057
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 16 of 30 PageID #:7058
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 17 of 30 PageID #:7059
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 18 of 30 PageID #:7060
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 19 of 30 PageID #:7061
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 20 of 30 PageID #:7062
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 21 of 30 PageID #:7063
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 22 of 30 PageID #:7064
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 23 of 30 PageID #:7065
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 24 of 30 PageID #:7066
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 25 of 30 PageID #:7067
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 26 of 30 PageID #:7068
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 27 of 30 PageID #:7069
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 28 of 30 PageID #:7070
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 29 of 30 PageID #:7071
Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 257-1 Filed: 09/27/10 Page 30 of 30 PageID #:7072
#### Jack Laub, Respondent, v Bolar Pharmaceutical, Inc., Appellant.

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated June 10, 1985, as denied its cross motion to dismiss the first and third causes of action, and a portion of the second cause of action of the complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and General Obligations Law § 5-701 (a) (1), as barred by the Statute of Frauds.

Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, cross motion granted, and the first and third causes of action and that portion of the second cause of action which seeks an accounting and judgment for commissions on sales made after the termination of plaintiff’s services are dismissed.

The complaint alleges that the parties entered into a verbal agreement whereby plaintiff, in return for a certain percentage of sales as commissions, was to procure large chain drug stores as customers for defendant’s generic drug products. At one point, the plaintiff requested of the defendant that the agreement be reduced to writing but the defendant refused to do so and the parties simply continued their relationship.

The defendant terminated the relationship and stopped paying the plaintiff commissions. The plaintiff is seeking, *inter alia,*commissions for sales to customers after his services were terminated. The defendant asserted the Statute of Frauds as a defense and moved to dismiss the first and third causes of action and a portion of the second cause of action of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and General Obligations Law § 5-701 (a) (1). Under the alleged agreement, the plaintiff’s right to commissions was not dependent upon any act of either the plaintiff or the defendant but, rather, depended upon an independent third party, a customer previously obtained for the defendant by the plaintiff. The contract, then, was not one which might be performed within a year and, as such, is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds *(see, Zupan v Blumberg,*2 NY2d 547; *D & N Boening v Kirsch Beverages,*99 AD2d 522, *affd*63 NY2d 449).

A review of the record before us fails to show written memoranda, either signed or unsigned, which would satisfy the Statute of Frauds for the purpose of permitting parol evidence as to the custom and practice of the trade *(see, Stulsaft v Mercer Tube & Mfg. Co.,*288 NY 255; *Dorman v Cohen,*66 AD2d 411). Nor are the circumstances so egregious *587as to render unconscionable, under the principle of estoppel, the assertion of the Statute of Frauds *(see, American Bartenders School v 105 Madison Co.,*91 AD2d 901, *affd*59 NY2d 716; *D & N Boening v Kirsch Beverages, supra).*Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Thomas O’Malley, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Vice President of Global Self Storage, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:

 

|  | 1.The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2016 (the “Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations on Global Self Storage, Inc. |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: May 16, 2016 | /s/ Thomas O’Malley                                                            |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Thomas O’Malley                                                                |
|               | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Vice President

(Principal Financial Officer) |

 

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by Global Self Storage, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Orders & ServicesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes Docs Prunus - Plum Inventory







Mainheadline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10518 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CURTIS MITCHELL O’BRIEN, a/k/a Rudolph P. (Peter) Heim,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:89-CR-009-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Curtis Mitchell O'Brien, federal prisoner # 17872-077, appeals

the district court’s denial o f his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e) motion

for return of property. O’Brien seeks the return of his aircraft

seized on April 5, 1989. The district court denied his Rule 41(e)

motion wi thout a response from the Government and without giving

any r easons for the denial. O’Brien argues on appeal that the

district court erred in denying his motion without a response byNo. 97-10518 -2-

the Government and without giving reasons. He contends that he has

s hown that his right to due process was violated by no notice or

hearing of forfeiture.

The allegations in O’Brien’s motion are specific and warranted

a response by the Government. The record contains no information

to support the district court’s s ummary denial of the motion

without reasons. The district court’s denial of the motion without

a response and without reasons leaves this court with no
opportunity for review. The district court abused its discretion.

United States v. Dean , 100 F.3d 19, 21 (5th Cir. 1996). S ee United

States v. McCormick

, 54 F.3d 214, 220 n.7 (5th Cir. 1994)

(entreating “the district courts of this circuit to discharge their

obligation to make appropriate findings on the record whenever such

findings are called for”). The district court’s judgment is

VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the district court for

further proceedings.

VACATED AND REMANDED.