alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,940
<INVENTORY>                                     30,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,066
<PP&E>                                           7,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,180
<SALES>                                         41,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,235
<CGS>                                           23,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,360
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,360
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46


</TABLE>
03C6472 Albrecht, et al. vs. Metro Pier, et el. Page 1 of 2

Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge

Morton Denlow Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

CASE NUMBER 03 C 6472 DATE 1/21/2005

CASE

TITLE

Albrecht, et al. vs. Metro Pier, et el.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT:

Reconvened settlement conference held. The parties have accepted the Court's recommendation regarding settlement. 

The matter is set for a further settlement conference on 02/09/05 at 9:30 a.m. for a report on the parties' progress in

completing the settlement documentation. In the event there remain disagreements about the language of the

documentation, the parties are to submit to chambers by the close of business on 02/08/05 a document setting forth the

specific disagreements and the parties' respective proposals for the resolution of those disagreements.

Docketing to mail notices.

Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

mm

Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 54 Filed: 01/21/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:389
03C6472 Albrecht, et al. vs. Metro Pier, et el. Page 2 of 2

Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 54 Filed: 01/21/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:390
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

At December 31, 2010, consolidated, directly or
indirectly, wholly-owned Significant Subsidiaries of Blount International, Inc. were deemed as follows:



|                               |  |                       
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY             |  | PLACE OF INCORPORATION
|Blount, Inc.                   |  | Delaware              
|Blount Canada Ltd.             |  | Canada                
|Blount Europe, S.A.            |  | Belgium               
|Blount Holdings Ltd.           |  | Canada                
|Blount Industrial Ltda.        |  | Brazil                
|Blount Industries Company Ltd. |  | China                 
|SP Companies, Inc.             |  | Delaware              
|SpeeCo, Inc.                   |  | Delaware              

The names of certain subsidiaries have been
omitted because when considered in the aggregate or as a single subsidiary they would not constitute a Significant Subsidiary as of December 31, 2010.
Case: 1:02-cv-07228 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/09/02 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 1:02-cv-07228 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/09/02 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:2

Case: 1:02-cv-07228 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/09/02 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:3

Case: 1:02-cv-07228 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/09/02 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:4

Case: 1:02-cv-07228 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/09/02 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:5

Case: 1:02-cv-07228 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/09/02 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:6

Case: 1:02-cv-07228 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/09/02 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:7

Case: 1:02-cv-07228 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/09/02 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:8
#### Amy McCONNELL, and on behalf of her four minor children, A.B., A.B., J.M., and J.M., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LASSEN COUNTY, California, a political subdivision of the state of California; James Chapman, Bob Pyle, Lloyd Keifer, Brian Dahle, and Jack Hanson, Board of Supervisors; Terry Chapman and Loel Griffith, Social Workers, Department of Child Protective Services of Lassen County; Kim Belshe, Director of California Department of Health Services; Barbara Coy; Environmental Alternatives, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-16023.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 2011.

Filed July 7, 2011.

*265Randall K. Edwards, Law Office of Randall K. Edwards, Salt Lake City, UT, Robert Hager, Treva Hearne, Esquire, General, Hager & Hearne, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Martha M. Stringer, Kathleen Jane Williams, Williams & Associates, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: THOMAS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and CARNEY, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Cormac J. Carney, District Judge for the United States District Court, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff-Appellant, Amy McConnell (McConnell), individually and on behalf of her four minor children, appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Environmental Alternatives (EA), and imposing sanctions against her attorneys.

1. The district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of EA. McConnell failed to raise a material issue of fact regarding EA’s purported breach of duty. Indeed, it was not foreseeable that molestation would occur in the foster home. *See J.L. v. Children’s Institute, Inc.,*177 Cal.App.4th 388, 396, 99 Cal.Rptr.3d 5 (2009) (noting the lack of “duty to protect the plaintiff from unforeseeable third party criminal conduct”) (citations omitted).

2. The district court acted within its discretion in allocating the burden of production for admission of the letter from one of the caseworkers. Parties seeking the admission of evidence bear the burden of showing its admissibility. *See Oracle Corp. Sec. Litig.,*627 F.3d 376, 385 (9th Cir.2010). Because McConnell sought admission of the letter, the district court properly placed the burden of authentication on her. *See id.*

3. Neither did the district court abuse its discretion by imposing sanctions on McConnell’s attorneys. A court may impose sanctions on attorneys who display recklessness or bad faith. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1927; *see also Lahiri v. Universal Music & Video Distrib. Corp.,*606 F.3d 1216, 1219 (9th Cir.2010). At a minimum, McConnell’s attorneys acted recklessly. They were warned several times during the course of the litigation that the authenticity of the letter was questionable.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTRED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




To
      the
      Board of Directors and Stockholders


US
      Global
      Nanospace, Inc.





We
      consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of US Global
      Nanospace, Inc.for the year ended March 31, 2006 and to the incorporation by
      reference in Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-128249 and
      333-131364) of US Global Nanospace, Inc. of our report dated August 21, 2006
      appearing in Item 7 in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.





/s/
      Grobstein, Horwath & Company LLP





Sherman
      Oaks, California


August
      22, 2006
Document

    







Gregory Case
Aon Corporation
United States


July 8, 2021




International Assignment: Chicago, Illinois to London, England




Dear Greg,


This letter serves to amend your international assignment letter effective July 1, 2016 governing the terms of your international assignment from Chicago, Illinois to London, England (your “International Assignment Letter”).  


Pursuant to this letter, the term of your international assignment shall be extended an additional one year, through June 30, 2022.  


Except as otherwise expressly modified herein, the terms of the International Assignment Letter, and your acknowledgment and acceptance thereof, shall continue in full force and effect.  


Please confirm acceptance of the terms and conditions of this letter by signing below and returning a copy of the signed letter to me.


Sincerely,






/s/ Lisa Stevens


Lisa Stevens
Chief People Officer




Acknowledged and Agreed:




/s/ Gregory Case
Gregory Case
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment to the Annual Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mitchell Herman Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
           Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
           operations of the Company for the periods presented.



         /S/ Mitchell Herman
-----------------------------------
Mitchell Herman
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Chief Accounting Officer





This Certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Securities and Exchange Commission [Release No. 34-92530]
 ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ernesto Lanza, Senior Counsel to the Director, Office of Municipal Securities, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or at (202) 551-5680. For the Commission, by the Office of Municipal Securities, pursuant to delegated authority.[1] J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary.
 Appendix Registrant name
SEC ID No.All American Municipal Advisors LLC
867-02070ARGENT TRUST Co
867-01984Black Holocaust Inc., d/b/a Black holocaust Mutual
867-02224Brock Steven Kyle d/b/a Thurber Brock & Associates
867-01746Burke Richard Stephen
867-02031C.A. WHITTAKER & ASSOCIATES, LLC, d/b/a Whittaker & Company, PLLC
867-01736D B & Co
867-02211DAMON ROCQUE SECURITIES CORP\/BD
867-01305Financing Ideas Inc
867-01649First Midwest Municipal Lease Corp., d/b/a Midwest Healthcare Capital (MHC)
867-02287Friedman, Luzzatto & Co
867-00536Garffer Jerome L., d/b/a G Capital Investments
867-01885Grant Financial Advisors, LLC
867-01818IFS Planning, INC
867-02298Ironwood Advisors
867-01112Laube Capital Advisors, LLC
867-02023Muni Funding Solutions LLC
867-02292Ross Infrastructure Development LLC
867-02344Shift 4 Consulting, L.L.C
867-01960


# Footnotes

1.
    
                                 17 CFR 200.30-3a(a)(1)(ii). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2021-16673 Filed 8-4-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7473

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GUADELMIRO REYES LOPEZ, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-99-38, CA-00-901-2) Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Guadelmiro Reyes Lopez, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Guadelmiro Reyes Lopez, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lopez , Nos. CR99-38; CA-00-901-2 (E.D. Va. May 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 240A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.240.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 240A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5621 August 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.240.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 240A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5621 August 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions |
| 2013/C 240A/01 | Notice of open selection procedure — Research Officer — Reference: EF-TA-13-01 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

2013/C 240A/01

Notice of open selection procedure — Research Officer — Reference: EF-TA-13-01

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 180 | (MT) |
| 182 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 183 | (IT) |
| 191 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 199 | |
| 200 | |
| 204 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 210 | (LV) |
| 211 | (PL) |
| 219 | |
| 227 | |
| 231 | |
| 235 | |
| 240 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

180

(MT)

182

(DE/EN/FR)

183

(IT)

191

192

193

194

196

197

199

200

204

(DE/EN/FR)

210

(LV)

211

(PL)

219

227

231

235

240

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-20165, 333-20167, 333-89949, 333-64083 and 333-68176) of Northwest Pipe Company of our report dated March 30, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statementschedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

March 30, 2007
#### William Banny et al., Respondents, v Randall B. Griepp, Appellant.

In a medical malpractice action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated January 23, 1985, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The affidavit of plaintiffs’ medical expert submitted in to the motion sets forth sufficient facts regarding alleged departure from accepted standards of medical practice to overcome the motion for summary judgment (CPLR 3212 [b]; *cf. Wind v Cacho,*111 AD2d 808). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


The Board of Directors
Broadway Financial Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 
333-17331) on Form S-8 of Broadway Financial Corporation of our report dated 
March 12, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Broadway 
Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998 and the related 
consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders' equity and cash 
flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1998, 
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Broadway Financial Corporation.

KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 23, 1999
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Battles, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Blangiardo, J.), rendered July 15, 1983, which convicted defendant, after jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, two counts of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentenced him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 7 Vi to 15 years on the conviction for attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, pursuant to Penal Law § 70.02 (4), and to three concurrent terms of 2 to 6 years on the remaining convictions, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reducing the sentence of 7 Vi to 15 years imposed on the conviction for attempted murder in the second degree to 5 to 15 years on that count, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People concede, the 7 Vi- to 15-year sentence for attempted murder in the second degree is an improper sentence since attempted murder is not an armed felony offense *(People v Lawrence,*97 AD2d 718, *affd*64 NY2d 200). An "armed felony” (CPL 1.20 [41]) is

> "any violent felony offense defined in section 70.02 of the penal law that includes as an element either:

> "(a) possession, being armed with or causing serious physical injury by means of a deadly weapon, if the weapon is a loaded weapon from which a shot, readily capable of producing death or other serious injury may be discharged; or "(b) display of what appears to be a pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, machine gun or other firearm.”

Although attempted murder in the second degree is a class B violent felony offense under Penal Law § 70.02, its elements do not include either possession of a deadly weapon or display of a firearm (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]). Possession, display or use of a firearm or deadly weapon is not an element of murder in the second degree or of attempted murder in the second degree. Obviously, either may be committed in other ways, without firearms or deadly weapons.

The maximum term of an indeterminate sentence for a class B violent felony must be at least six years and must not exceed 25 years (Penal Law § 70.02 [3] [a]). As provided in Penal Law § 70.02 (4), the minimum period of imprisonment under an indeterminate sentence for a class B violent felony *510cannot exceed one third of the maximum term imposed, which in this case was 15 years. Hence, Trial Term improperly set the minimum period at *IV2*years.

Accordingly, we have directed that the minimum be reduced to five years.

We have examined the remaining contentions of defendant and find no basis to disturb the verdict of the jury or the remaining sentences imposed. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Fein, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
# Official Journal L 202/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 202 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 619 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 202

English edition

Legislation

Volume 619 August 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1105 of 8 August 2018 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to procedures and forms for the provision of information by competent authorities to ESMA under Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1106 of 8 August 2018 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to templates for the compliance statement to be published and maintained by administrators of significant and non-significant benchmarks pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1105 of 8 August 2018 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to procedures and forms for the provision of information by competent authorities to ESMA under Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1106 of 8 August 2018 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to templates for the compliance statement to be published and maintained by administrators of significant and non-significant benchmarks pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

9

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.