alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         July 29, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 12, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class Package Service Contract 74 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-112, CP2021-114.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-16102 Filed 7-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document

Exhibit 10.1


May 12th, 2021






Dear Trent,


In recognition of your new role and added responsibilities with LendingTree, Inc. your base salary is being adjusted accordingly.


Effective May 23rd, 2021 your base pay will reflect an increase to $325,000 annually, less applicable deductions. This change will be reflected in your June 11th, 2021 paycheck.


Also, effective January 1st, 2021 your new Annual Bonus Target is 50% of your Base Pay and your Annual Equity Grant Target is $800,000. Payouts can be greater than or less than target and are a function of company and individual performance as well as management discretion and may not be awarded in each year. Please note that all applicable deductions will be made from bonus checks, such as 401k contributions (if any), Federal and State taxes, etc.


You will also receive a one-time equity compensation award in the amount of $600,000 under the Amended and Restated LendingTree, Inc. Stock and Annual Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 50% of the award value will be granted as LendingTree Restricted Stock Units and 50% will be granted as LendingTree non-qualified stock options with option value determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The award will vest in equal amounts annually over three years. The grant date will be June 3rd, 2021 and the exact number of RSUs will be determined using the closing price of the Company’s stock on said grant date. You will receive an award notice providing the details of your grant, including the number of shares granted, and the terms and conditions of the award. Detailed information on your award, as well as the Terms and Conditions and the Plan, will be available for your review on the E*Trade website. Please allow 4 – 6 weeks for the award to be loaded and visible in E*Trade.


Thank you for your contributions to the organization and we look forward to your continued leadership to the team!




Sincerely,


/s/ Jill Olmstead


Jill Olmstead
Chief HR & Administrative Officer
LendingTree Inc.
Exhibit
32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the foregoing Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

The
undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
Section 78) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial
Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Date: May 5, 2014

By:

/s/ Brenda J. Battey Brenda J. Battey
Chief Financial Officer
Broadway Financial Corporation


---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin M., Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant (1) as limited by his brief, from two sentences of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), both imposed September 10, 1981, after his pleas of guilty to burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 52801 and attempted burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 42802, and upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, each sentence being 60 days’ imprisonment and five years’ probation, to run concurrently, and restitution of $1,000 on each count, and (2) from two amended judgments of the same court, both rendered February 8, 1982, which, upon a determination that he had violated a special condition of probation, vacated the September 10, 1981 sentences and resentenced him to two concurrent indeterminate terms of one year and 4 months to 4 years’ imprisonment.

Amended judgments rendered February 8, 1982 affirmed.

Appeals from the sentences imposed September 10, 1981 dismissed.

No notice of appeal from the sentences imposed September 10, 1981, was ever filed, nor was any application for an extension of time made therefor. In any event, we have examined defendant’s contentions and find them to be without merit.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal as to the amended judgments rendered February 8, 1982. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         107,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,178
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,196
<PP&E>                                           8,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,330
<BONDS>                                         42,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,230
<SALES>                                         50,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,544
<CGS>                                            6,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   258
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,172
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,492)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 22 Filed: 04/27/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:178

Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 22 Filed: 04/27/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:179
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

SALVADOR RUIZ-CORTEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-30000 

D.C. No. 1:17-cr-02029-SMJ-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2019**

Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Salvador Ruiz-Cortez appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 135-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction 

for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ruiz-Cortez’s counsel has 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-30000 

filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to 

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ruiz-Cortez the opportunity to 

file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief 

has been filed. 

Ruiz-Cortez waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent 

review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses 

no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 

F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 

988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Water Management Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Commodity Protection and Quality Research
                                    Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Water Management Research People Suduan Gao





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

Research Team - Gaoheadline bar Dr. Suduan GaoAileen HendratnaRuijun QinRobert Shenk


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9057-6] 

*Responsible Agency:* Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/​nepa. 

## Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 

### Filed July 19, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through July 26, 2021 10 a.m. EST 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

*Notice:* Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at: *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20210101, Final, NOAA, HI,* Enhancing Protections for Hawaiian Spinner Dolphins to Prevent Disturbance,  Review Period Ends: 08/30/2021, Contact: Kevin Brindock 808-725-5146.

*EIS No. 20210102, Draft Supplement, FERC, PA,* Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project,  Comment Period Ends: 09/13/2021, Contact: Office of External Affairs 866-208-3372.

*EIS No. 20210103, Draft, FTA, CA,* West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Draft Environmental Impact       ( print page 41032)    Statement/Environmental Impact Report,  Comment Period Ends: 09/13/2021, Contact: Rusty Whisman 213-202-3956.

Dated: July 26, 2021. 

Candi Schaedle, 

Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2021-16258 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### Karen Farr, Respondent, v George L. Farr, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered January 17, 1984, which granted renewal, and, upon renewal, granted plaintiff wife’s application to discontinue the action with prejudice.

Order modified, on the law, by deleting the words “used as the basis for her original complaint up to and including July 19, 1980” and substituting therefor “which might have been the basis for an action prior to January 17, 1984”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Absent special circumstances it is well established that parties should not be compelled to litigate *(Cogan v Cogan,*90 AD2d 491, 492). Upon this record, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff’s application to discontinue the matrimonial action with prejudice *(Tucker v Tucker,*55 NY2d 378, 384, n 2; *Cogan v Cogan, supra;*CPLR 3217 [b]). However, to fully avoid any prejudice to defendant as might occur should plaintiff desire to initiate a second action to take advantage of the equitable distribution law (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B]), we have modified the order to provide that a new action may not be based upon any conduct of defendant which might have been the basis for an action prior to January 17,1984 *(see, Knobel v Knobel,*60 NY2d 672). Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        247,836    
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      5,002,277
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   548,757
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      2,852,018
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        2,950,700
<LOANS>                                    13,554,780
<ALLOWANCE>                                    60,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             23,030,148
<DEPOSITS>                                 15,779,150
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           636,320
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        4,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  6,610,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             23,030,148
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               584,206
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             128,751
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              139,129
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              852,086
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            386,356
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            386,356
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         465,730
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               314,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               156,350
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    156,350
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   91,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.64
<LOANS-NON>                                         0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    0       
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              60,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           60,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Harry G. Mitchell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sontra Medical Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in
this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 20, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Harry G. Mitchell  
|Harry G. Mitchell      
|Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mericko Dukes, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s claim of error arising from comments made by the prosecutor on summation is unpreserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and on this record it cannot be said that defendant was deprived of a fair trial (CPL 470.15 [6] *971[a]). To the extent that the prosecutor’s comments exceeded the scope of permissible response to defense counsel’s summation, defendant was not thereby prejudiced. In light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt and the trial court’s appropriate instructions to the jury on credibility, there is no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted defendant had it not been for the erroneous remarks of the prosecutor *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—assault, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Pine, JJ.