alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMERIN
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           308,076
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 328,793
<CASH>                                           1,176
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           5,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,824
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 18,730
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             20,525
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           261<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                     300,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,824
<PREMIUMS>                                      62,349
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             16,871
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 161
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      20,681
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      8,485
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            10,623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,592
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   7,092
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             20,344
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  337
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               3,821
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 5,222
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 18,730
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Common Stock at Par Value
</FN>


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Water Management Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Commodity Protection and Quality Research
                                    Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Water Management Research People & Locations





- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- Wang Research Team
- Research Team Wang
- Selected Publications - Wang
- Gao and Wang Research
- Main
- Awards
- Grants
- Recent Magazine Articles
- Collaborators
- Cooperators
- Dong Wang - Research Leader
- James Ayars
- Gary Banuelos
- Suduan Gao
- James Gerik
- Ruijun Qin

Dong  Wang
                     

                     Research Leader


                     Phone: (559) 596-2852
                     
                     

                     Fax: (559) 596-2851
                     

                     9611 S. RIVERBEND AVE.                            
                     
                     

                     PARLIER                       , CA 93648


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0019 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0019

**2003/19/EC: Council Decision of 14 October 2002 on declassifying certain parts of the Sirene Manual adopted by the Executive Committee established by the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 **

*
Official Journal L 008 , 14/01/2003 P. 0034 - 0034 *

Council Decision

of 14 October 2002

on declassifying certain parts of the Sirene Manual adopted by the Executive Committee established by the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985

(2003/19/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 207 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) By its Decision of 14 December 1993 (SCH/Com-ex (93) 22 rev) and 23 June 1998 (SCH/Com-ex (98) 17), the Executive Committee established by the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985, which was replaced by the Council pursuant to Article 2 of the Schengen Protocol, classified as "Confidential" the Sirene Manual, the final version of which was adopted by the Decision of the said Executive Committee on 28 April 1999 (SCH/Com-ex (99) 5).

(2) The Sirene Manual and the Decisions of the Executive Committee on its classification form part of the Schengen acquis as defined by the Council in its Decision 1999/435/EC of 20 May 1999.

(3) Certain parts of the Sirene Manual should be declassified.

(4) Certain parts of the Sirene Manual should have their classification downgraded to "Restreint UE".

(5) It is appropriate to repeal the Executive Committee decisions (SCH/Com-ex (93) 22 rev) and (SCH/Com-ex (98) 17) insofar as they relate to the classification of the Sirene Manual, so that future decisions on its classification may be taken in accordance with the normal rules on the classification of documents, as set out in Council Decision 2001/264/EC of 19 March 2001 adopting the Council's security regulations(1),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Sirene Manual shall be declassified, with the exception of section 2.3 and Annexes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Article 2

Section 2.3 of the Sirene Manual, as well as Annexes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 shall be classified "Restreint UE".

Article 3

The declassified parts of the Sirene Manual shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 4

1. The decisions of the Schengen Executive Committee of 14 December 1993 (SCH/Com-ex (93)22 rev.) and of 23 June 1998 (SCH/Com-ex (98) 17) shall be repealed insofar as they relate to the Sirene Manual.

2. Future decisions on the classification of the Sirene Manual shall be taken in accordance with the provisions of Decision 2001/264/EC.

Article 5

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Luxembourg, 14 October 2002.

For the Council

The President

L. Espersen

(1) OJ L 101, 11.4.2001, p. 1.
#### Bradley *v.*Lithonia & Arabia Mountain Railway Co. *et al.*

Lumpkin, J.

1. A railroad company sought to condemn a right of way across certain land. An equitable petition was filed by the landowner, attacking the right of the company to do so. A temporary restraining order was granted, but was later modified by reciting that the *275railroad was constructed across a certain strip before the restraining order was granted, and permitting the defendant to operate its trains and carry on its business pending the disposition of the case, on condition that the tracks should be removed if it should be determined that 'there was no right of condemnation. On the hearing an interlocutory injunction was granted, and the defendant was directed to remove its tracks. On exception, this judgment was affirmed (141 *Ga.*740, 81 S. E. 1104). In the meantime another company was incorporated, and succeeded to the property and rights of the first. A question having been raised as to the power of the first company to condemn, the second instituted condemnation proceedings. An injunction to restrain this was denied, and the judgment was affirmed (141 *Ga.*741, 82 S. E. 138).- In the first case, the second company filed its petition praying to be made a party, to be allowed to continue to use the strip as a right of way until the determination of its proceeding to condemn, and for other relief. This petition was allowed, subject to demurrer and objection. Objection to the making of the second company a party and a demurrer to the pleading were filed and overruled. Exceptions pendente lite were filed. The judgment of this court was made the judgment of the trial court, and the injunction was so modified as to suspend the requirement of the removal of the track until the right of the second company to make the condemnation should be determined. The plaintiff excepted. *Eeld,*that the judgment as to which exceptions pendente lite were filed, even if it could otherwise have been excepted to as final, was, by filing such exceptions, treated as an interlocutory ruling, and thereafter would not furnish a basis for a direct exception before the final termination of the case. *Durrence*v. *Waters,*140 *Ga.*762 (79 S. E. 841).

March 9, 1915.

Intervention; from Fulton. Motion to dismiss.

*B. B. Blackburn,*for plaintiff.

*J. L. Key, McDaniel & Black,*and *E. A. Neely,*for defendants.

2. The modification of the interlocutory injunction, above stated, was not such a final judgment as to furnish a basis for a direct bill of exceptions. Nor, under former rulings of this court, was such judgment the refusing of an injunction, so as to furnish a basis for direct exception. *Stubbs*v. *McConnell,*119 *Ga.*21 (45 S. E. 710), and cases cited.

3. It follows that the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. '

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Evans, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.), rendered November 2, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence of *lVz*to *AV2*years’ imprisonment.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant failed to raise his objections to the adequacy of his plea allocution in the court of first instance and accordingly has not preserved his claims for appellate review *(see, People v Hoke,*62 NY2d 1022; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). In any event, we find that the allocution established the requisite elements of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and that defendant knowingly and intelligently pleaded guilty thereto *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9).

Finally, the sentence of *IV2*to *AV2*years’ imprisonment was not excessive. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2012

h0320 

# Order

March 23, 2012

142842 & (53)(66)

KENNETH ADMIRE, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 142842 COA: 289080 AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Ingham CC: 07-001752-NF Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On March 7, 2012, the Cour t heard oral argument on th e application for leave to appeal the February 15 , 2011 judgment of the Court of A ppeals. On order of the Court, the motion to strike portions of the plainti ff’s briefs and exhib its is DENIED. The application is again considered, and it is GRANTED. The partie s shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether MCL 500.3107(1)(a) allows th e plaintiff to recover the full cost of handicap-accessible transporta tion or whether the plai ntiff’s recovery is

offset to the extent that th e handicap-accessible transportation replaces the plaintiff’s other transportation costs; (2) if the plaint iff’s recovery is offs et, what procedure a factfinder must undertake in calculating the am ount of the plaintiff’s recovery and what evidence is relevant to that calculation; (3) whether there is any basis in MCL 500.3107(1)(a) to treat transportation costs differently from other household expenses, such as food or housing, that every person incurs whether injured or not; and (4) whether the principles and standards articulated in Griffith v State Farm Mu tual Automobile Ins

, 472 Mich 521 (2005), are sufficien t to resolve this dispute.

We invite the continued par ticipation of all amici who ha ve previously appeared in this case. Other persons or groups interested in the dete rmination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for perm ission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 21 , 2019.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00727- CV

SONIA BARBOZA, Appellant

V.

MORRELL MASONRY SUPPLY, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-20565

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 9, 2018 . The clerk’s record

was filed November 6, 2018

. The reporter’s record was filed September 18, 2018.

No brief was filed.

On January 10, 2019 , this court issued an order stating that unless appellant

filed a brief on or before January 25, 2019 , the court would dismiss the a ppeal for want of prosecution. S ee Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).2

Appellant filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Poisonous Plant Research: Logan, UT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    IACUC SummariesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Logan, Utah Poisonous Plant Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications

Dale R Gardner
                     

                     Research Chemist
                     


                        ProjectsNon-Funded Cooperative Agreement for Research Involving Animals
                                       Non-Funded Cooperative Agreement

                                                   (N)Accession Number: 443157


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-5098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus LEWIS MURDOCK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-02-225) Submitted: June 21, 2006 Decided: July 7, 2006 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, Eric D. Placke, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lewis Murdock appeals the revocation of his supervised release and resulting twelve-month prison term. Finding no error, we affirm. Counsel for Murdock has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he states there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but presents for this court’s review the issue of the propriety of Murdock’s prison sentence. Although notified of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, Murdock has not done so. Murdock admittedthe substance of the conduct that violated the terms of his supervised release, so there was an adequate basis for revocation. The court considered the statutory maximum, the advisory guideline range, and Murdock’s history of violations, and imposed a sentence of twelve months, at the top of the advisory range. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error in Murdock’s sentence. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the revocation of Murdock’s supervised release and the resulting term of imprisonment. This court requires that counsel inform Murdock, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Murdock requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes- 3 - that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Murdock. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued pu blished opinions have been appealed to the Supreme Court:

1. Major Lance Hillman
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0287-17-3 Opinion rendered by Judge Malveaux on April 3, 2018

2. Patrick D arnell Hill
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0482-17-1 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on April 24, 2018

3. Leslie Itutu Camp
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0483-17-2 Opinion rendered by Judge Russell on May 8, 2018The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued p ublished opinions have been disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Ashley Jennifer White
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 1322-16-3 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty on September 19, 2017 Refused (171543)

2. Aaron Markeith Gerald
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 0731-16-1 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on October 17, 2017 Refused (171405)

3. Angel Alexis Ca rtagena, a/k/a Veguilla Angel Alexis Cartegena
v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 2002-16-1 Opinion rendered by Judge Russell on November 28, 2017 Refused (171718)