alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of June 30, 1998, and statements of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to 
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<PERIOD-TYPE>     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                            1,151,201
<SECURITIES>                        170,202
<RECEIVABLES>                       637,584
<ALLOWANCES>                        (30,000)
<INVENTORY>                         490,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,771,199
<PP&E>                            2,620,749
<DEPRECIATION>                     (823,939)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   11,981,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             4,846,656
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             11,300
<OTHER-SE>                        6,683,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     11,981,694
<SALES>                           2,366,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,686,485
<CGS>                             1,556,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,556,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  117,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (3,822,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (3,822,479)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (3,822,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.35)

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Additional ResourcesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects

Crystal  Loving
                     

                     Research Microbiologist


                     Phone: (515) 337-7364
                     
                     

                     Fax: (515) 337-7149
                     

                     P.O. Box 70                                       
                     1920 DAYTON AVE                                   
                     

                     AMES                          , IA 50010


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# Official Journal L 124/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 124 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6527 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 124

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6527 April 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/678 of 26 April 2022 amending Annexes V and XIV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/404 as regards the entries for Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States in the lists of third countries authorised for the entry into the Union of consignments of poultry, germinal products of poultry and fresh meat of poultry and game birds (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/679 of 19 January 2022 establishing a watch list of substances and compounds of concern for water intended for human consumption as provided for in Directive (EU) 2020/2184 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2022) 142)

   (
  1
  ) | 41 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/678 of 26 April 2022 amending Annexes V and XIV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/404 as regards the entries for Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States in the lists of third countries authorised for the entry into the Union of consignments of poultry, germinal products of poultry and fresh meat of poultry and game birds (
  1
  )

1

1

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/679 of 19 January 2022 establishing a watch list of substances and compounds of concern for water intended for human consumption as provided for in Directive (EU) 2020/2184 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2022) 142)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 142)

1

41

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00130-CV 

 

L.T. RUNELS, JR., APPELLANT 

V. 

TAX LOANS USA, LTD., APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 99th District Court 

 Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2019-534,715, Honorable Edward Lee Self, Presiding 

June 28, 2022 

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant, L.T. Runels, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial 

court’s Joint Summary Judgment. We dismissed the appeal due to his failure to pay the 

required filing fee. Subsequent to our opinion, Runels filed a motion for rehearing and 

submitted payment for the fee. Consequently, we grant his motion for rehearing, withdraw 

our opinion and judgment, and reinstate the appeal. 
2

Prior to dismissal, we notified Runels that his appeal appeared untimely. Although 

the trial court signed the summary judgment order on February 1, 2022, Runels did not 

file a notice of appeal until April 20, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1 (requiring a notice of 

appeal to be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed if no timely motion for 

new trial or motion to modify the judgment is filed). His notice of appeal was accompanied 

by a motion for new trial. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a) (requiring a motion for new trial to 

be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed). 

Runels responded to our inquiry, claiming that he did not receive notice or obtain 

actual knowledge of the Joint Summary Judgment until April 28, 2022. On May 3, 2022, 

he filed a motion for additional time to file an appeal in the trial court pursuant to Rule of 

Civil Procedure 306a. The parties have advised the Court that the motion remains 

pending. 

We are obligated to determine, sua sponte, our jurisdiction to hear an appeal. 

Welch v. McDougal, 876 S.W.2d 218, 220 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1994, writ denied). And, 

a timely notice of appeal is essential to invoking our jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.1(b), 26.1. We, therefore, 1) abate this appeal, 2) remand the cause to the trial court 

to conduct a hearing on Runels’ pending Rule 306a motion in a reasonable manner it 

chooses, and 3) direct it to determine the date on which Runels first received notice or 

acquired actual knowledge that the Joint Summary Judgment was signed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 4.2; TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a; PDG, Inc. v. Abilene Vill., LLC, No. 07-19-00118-CV, 

2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 3129, at *3 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Apr. 17, 2019, order) (per curiam) 

(remanding the cause to the trial court to enter findings in accordance with appellate rule 
3

4.2). The trial court shall enter its findings in a written order and include the order in a 

supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with this Court by July 28, 2022.

Per Curiam
#### Dario Ico SAN AGUSTIN; Lucila Calalang San Agustin, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-72910.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed June 29, 2011.

Deborah Karapetian, Law Offices of Deborah L. Karapetian, Glendale, CA, for Petitioners.

Julie M. Iversen, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Dario Ico San Agustín and Lucila Cala-lang San Agustín, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Singh v. Gonzales,*491 F.3d 1090, 1095 (9th Cir.2007), and we deny the petition for review.

In their opening brief, petitioners fail to address, and therefore have waived any challenge to, the BIA’s dispositive determination that they failed to demonstrate due diligence warranting equitable tolling of their untimely motion to reopen. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

In light of this disposition, we need not reach petitioners’ remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          7,826,365
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,440,308
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (189,377)
<INVENTORY>                                       662,534
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               34,683,939
<PP&E>                                         83,216,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,598,221)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 99,525,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,122,410
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           62,864
<OTHER-SE>                                     59,636,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   99,525,699
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              193,506,902
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 191,371,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,818,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   634,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                      296,536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      338,144
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.05
        


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 1611

_____________________________
E D C OX J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Barbara K. Hobbs , Judge

. July 24, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. W OLF , R OBERTS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Ed Cox Jr., pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 275 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 275

  Designating October 30, 2011, as a national day of remembrance for 
                    nuclear weapons program workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2011

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. 
  Udall of New Mexico, Ms. Cantwell, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Graham, Mr. 
     Crapo, Mr. McConnell, and Mr. Corker) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating October 30, 2011, as a national day of remembrance for 
                    nuclear weapons program workers.

Whereas, since World War II, hundreds of thousands of men and women, including 
        uranium miners, millers, and haulers, have served the United States by 
        building the nuclear defense weapons of the United States;
Whereas these dedicated workers paid a high price for their service to develop a 
        nuclear weapons program for the benefit of the United States, including 
        having developed disabling or fatal illnesses;
Whereas the Senate recognized the contribution, service, and sacrifice these 
        patriotic men and women made for the defense of the United States in 
        Senate Resolution 151, 111th Congress, agreed to May 20, 2009, and 
        Senate Resolution 653, 111th Congress, agreed to September 28, 2010;
Whereas a national day of remembrance time capsule has been crossing the United 
        States, collecting artifacts and the stories of the nuclear workers 
        relating to the nuclear defense era of the United States;
Whereas these stories and artifacts reinforce the importance of recognizing 
        these nuclear workers; and
Whereas these patriotic men and women deserve to be recognized for the 
        contribution, service, and sacrifice they have made for the defense of 
        the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 30, 2011, as a national day of 
        remembrance for nuclear weapons program workers, including 
        uranium miners, millers, and haulers, of the United States; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to support 
        and participate in appropriate ceremonies, programs, and other 
        activities to commemorate October 30, 2011, as a national day 
        of remembrance for past and present workers in the nuclear 
        weapons program of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
*

The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3664

___________

Linda Cooper-Igwebuike, Rev., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

United Methodist Church, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee, *

*

Janice Riggle Huie, Bishop, *

*

Defendant. *

___________

Submitted: December 7, 2005

Filed: December 27, 2005

___________

Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

The Reverend Linda Cooper-Igwebuike appeals the district court’s*

 dismissal

with prejudice of her Title VII action. Having reviewed the record de novo, we agree

the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, because the case fell under the

ministerial exception to Title VII. See Scharon v. St. Luke’s Episcopal Presbyterian
-2-

Hospitals, 929 F.2d 360 (8th Cir. 1991). Moreover, we fail to see how CooperIgwebuike was prejudiced by the district court’s failure to consider her motion for

appointed counsel before dismissing the action. See Nelson v. Redfield Lithograph

Printing, 728 F.2d 1003, 1005 (8th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          71,762
<SECURITIES>                                    92,820
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                       720
<INVENTORY>                                     20,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               240,514
<PP&E>                                          29,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,498
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                     259,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   328,104
<SALES>                                        234,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,530
<CGS>                                          108,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   580
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,464
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,079
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,079
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research: Logan, UT
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Logan, Utah Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research Docs





- Bees
- Blue Orchard Bee - Fact Sheet
- Pollination
- How To's
- Bee Lab Main

Small Fruit Pollinationheadline bar  Bee pollination benefits most cultivated small fruits that are farmed in the world temperate zones.  The extent of benefit primarily varies with the fruit species.  At one extreme, sweet cherries and rabbiteye blueberries are self incompatible, requiring a pollinator to move pollen from one variety to another.  Many other cultivated species of small fruits are self fertile, but require a pollinator to simply move pollen from an anther to a stigma.  Examples include highbush blueberry, tart cherries, cranberries, raspberries, and blackberries.  These last two, as well as strawberries, are capable of considerable autopollination, producing fruits iin the absence of floral visitors.  Even with these, however, larger and more uniform fruit can result from bee pollination.  Research at our lab has focused both on documenting pollination benefits of bees for many of these fruits, identifying good pollinators, and developing effective, practical means of multiplying native bees for the job.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov