alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1471

DANIEL FELIX, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

DARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; DOUG DOUGHTIE, Sheriff; 

DONAVAN RUTH, Deputy; JEFF CRUDEN, District Attorney; ANDREW 

WOMBLE, District Attorney; DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAND; JOSH STEIN, 

NC Attorney General; ROY COOPER, NC Governor, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Elizabeth City. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (2:19-cv-00030-BR) 

Submitted: December 31, 2020 Decided: January 21, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed as modified in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Daniel Felix, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Florencio Castro, Christopher J. Geis, WOMBLE 

BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Kathryn Hicks Shields, 

Assistant Attorney General, Bryan Grant Nichols, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Daniel Felix appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of 

personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. The court’s dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, however, should 

have been without prejudice. See S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n, Inc. v. 

OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC, 713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir. 2013). We therefore modify 

that portion of the district court’s order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice and 

affirm that dismissal as modified. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106; MM ex rel. DM v. Sch. Dist. of 

Greenville Cnty., 303 F.3d 523, 536 (4th Cir. 2002) (“[W]e are entitled to affirm the court’s 

judgment on alternate grounds, if such grounds are apparent from the record.”). We affirm 

the remainder of the district court’s dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Felix v. Dare Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 2:19-cv-00030-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 2020). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED IN PART,

AFFIRMED IN PART
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer and Director of New
Jersey Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: November13, 2006

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCHFred W. Brackebusch,
President, Treasurer & Director

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Carl Hayden Bee Research Center: Tucson, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Information
                        Africanized Honey Bees
                                    Bee Safety
                                    Online Books
                                    Other NewsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






DeGrandi-Hoffman Labheadline bar DeGrandi-Hoffman Lab Research Areas


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2598** 

KING GRANT

- DAVIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. SHANE FORTUNE; SCOTT BLIEMEISTER; JEROME BURGESS; GREG LEY, of Wal

- Mart, Charleston, South Carolina District; WAL

- MART , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. Patrick Michael Duffy , Senior District Judge. ( 2 : 15

- cv - 04211

- PMD )

Submitted : April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. King Grant

- Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: King Grant

- Davis a ppeals the district cour t ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. W e have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court
. Gr ant

Davis v. Fortune , No. 2:15

- cv - 04211

- PMD (D.S.C. Dec. 8 , 2015)
. We decline to consider the arguments Grant

- Davis raises for the first time on appeal. Muth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, W. Marston Becker, Acting Chief Executive Officer of LaSalle Re Holdings
Limited, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Annual
Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
and that the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of LaSalle Re Holdings Limited.

Date:  April 30, 2003


/s/ W. Marston Becker
--------------------------------
W. Marston Becker
Acting Chief Executive Officer


                                       71
#### RICHARD DEEVES & SON, Respondent, v. MANHATTAN LIFE INS. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by Richard Deeves & Son against the Manhattan Life Insurance Company. E. S. Rapallo, for appellant. J. Frankenheimer, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2174

J. CAROLYN STRINGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-4536-3-17)

Submitted: May 12, 2003 Decided: May 21, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

J. Carolyn Stringer, Appellant Pro Se. John Bowman McLeod,

HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

J. Carolyn Stringer appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of UNUM Life Insurance Co. on

her claim that UNUM breached the terms of her disability insurance

contract when it retroactively terminated her disability policy and

her claim that the termination was in bad faith.

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Higgins v.

E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988).

Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no material facts

in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter

of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S.

317, 322 (1986). We view the evidence in the light most favorable

to the non-moving party. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S.

242, 255 (1986). 

We have reviewed the record and conclude the district court

properly concluded UNUM did not breach the contract by

retroactively terminating it because Stringer had not met minimum

work requirements for coverage. Because UNUM had a contractual

right to cancel the policy, Stringer cannot prove bad faith. See

Pitts v. Jackson Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 574 S.E.2d 502, 512-13 (S.C.

Ct. App. 2002). Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the

reasoning of the district court. See Stringer v. UNUM Life Ins.

Co., No. CA-01-4536-3-17 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 4, 2002; entered Sept.

6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
3

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pullman, Washington Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research Docs





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Staff Organizational Chart
- Pullman Facilities
- Central Ferry Farm
- Prosser Facilities
- Frank Dugan

Facilities - Pullman - Palouseheadline bar   *The Palouse*  The Palouse RegionStation facilities are located on the campus of Washington State University (WSU) in Pullman, Washington and on a farm at Central Ferry, Washington. This part of eastern Washington is called the Palouse, a region of extremely rich soil that is extensively farmed. The Palouse is composed of hills created by glacial soil blown in from the west by prevailing winds.  Washington State University   Pullman Farm   Seed Storage   Central Ferry Farm


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM PURCHASE
POINT MEDIA  CORPORATION  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE TWELVE
MONTHS  THEN  ENDED  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1
<CURRENCY>                          US-DOLLARS

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                               1
<CASH>                                                      436
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            436
<PP&E>                                                    9,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                            1,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           47,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   917,232
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                546,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                 170
<OTHER-SE>                                           (1,416,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             47,279
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           344,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      138,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (483,493)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (483,493)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (483,493)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.04)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,457,334
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (16,555)
<INVENTORY>                                    836,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,450,597
<PP&E>                                         110,774
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,695,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          448,003
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,542
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,934,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,695,981
<SALES>                                        226,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,344
<CGS>                                          112,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               740,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (605,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (605,831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (605,831)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
#### Hyman J. Schwartz, Respondent, v Lawrence Leonard, Appellant.

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of a fiduciary duty and for an accounting, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated April 15, 1985, which granted the plaintiffs motion to strike the defendant’s demand for a jury trial.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Special Term correctly struck the defendant’s demand for a jury trial *(see, Seneca v Novaro,*80 AD2d 909). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:2
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:3
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:4
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:5
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:6
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:7
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:8
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:9
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:10
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:11
Case: 1:02-cv-07316 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/11/02 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:12
# Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, subject to fulfilling the requirements of section 652 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), and in order to provide assistance for refugees, victims of conflict, and other persons at risk as a result of the situation in Afghanistan, including applicants for Special Immigrant Visas, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State:

(1) the authority under section 506(a)(2) of the FAA to direct the drawdown of up to $200,000,000 in articles and services from the inventory and resources of any agency of the United States Government and military education and training from the Department of Defense for the purposes and under the authorities of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962;

(2) the authority to make the determination under section 506(a)(2) of the FAA to direct such drawdown; and

(3) the authority under section 652 of the FAA to make, before any such drawdown, the required notifications to the Congress.

                        You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         *Federal Register*.                    

[FR Doc. 2021-16379

Billing code 4710-10-P
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Crops Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ScientistsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin Vegetable Crops Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

People and Locations at Madison, Wisconsin   [Expand All] [Collapse All]
  (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov