alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:129

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:130

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:131

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:132

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:133

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:134

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:135

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:136

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:137

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:138

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:139

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:140

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 32 Filed: 01/24/03 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:141
Document

EXHIBIT 10.2

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “First Amendment”) is effective January 1, 2019 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Live Nation Worldwide, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Live Nation”), and John M. Hopmans (the “Employee”).


WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2015 (the “Original Agreement”).


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Original Agreement as set forth below.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements included in this First Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:


1.    The first sentence of Section 1 (“TERM OF EMPLOYMENT”) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


“The Employee’s term of employment will start on the Effective Date and ends on the close of business on March 31, 2019 (the “Term”), unless terminated earlier pursuant to the terms set forth in Section 5 below.”


2.    The Original Agreement is and shall continue to be in full force and effect, except as amended by this First Amendment, and except that all references in the Original Agreement to the “Agreement” or words of like import referring to the Original Agreement shall mean the Original Agreement as amended by this First Amendment.  If there is conflict between this First Amendment and the Original Agreement, the terms of this First Amendment will prevail.


3.    Any and all defined terms which are not explicitly defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Original Agreement.


4.    This First Amendment may be signed in counterpart originals, which collectively shall have the same legal effect as if all signatures appeared on the same physical document.  This First Amendment may be signed and exchanged by electronic or facsimile transmission, with the same legal effect as if the signatures had appeared in original handwriting on the same physical document.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed and delivered this First Amendment effective as of the date first written above.
        














												
				THE EMPLOYEE



	Date:	March 12, 2019		 /s/ John M. Hopmans

				John M. Hopmans
				
				

LIVE NATION WORLDWIDE, INC.

				
				
	Date:	March 12, 2019		 By:      /s/ Kathy Willard

				Name: Kathy Willard
				Title:   EVP and Chief Financial Officer




[Signature Page to First Amendment]
-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1000 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1000

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse at 500 State Avenue in Kansas 
   City, Kansas, as the ``Robert J. Dole United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT J. DOLE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse at 500 State Avenue in Kansas City, 
Kansas, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert J. Dole United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert J. Dole 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate July 25, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1000

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse at 500 State Avenue in Kansas 
   City, Kansas, as the ``Robert J. Dole United States Courthouse''.
```
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 40919 

[FR Doc. 2021–16329 Filed 7–29–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9112–FP–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

8 CFR Chapter I 

[DHS Docket No. ICEB–2017–0001] 

RIN 1653–AA67 

Ratification of Department Action 

AGENCY: Department of Homeland 

Security (DHS). 

ACTION: Ratification. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland 

Security is publishing notification of the 

Secretary of Homeland Security’s 

ratification of a rule. 

DATES: The ratification was signed on 

April 15, 2021 and relates back to the 

original date of the action that it ratifies. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leo 

(Chip) Boucher, Assistant General 

Counsel, Administrative Law, Office of 

the General Counsel, Department of 

Homeland Security, Washington, DC 

20528, (202) 282–9822. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 

15, 2021, the Secretary of Homeland 

Security ratified a final rule entitled, 

Procedures and Standards for Declining 

Surety Immigration Bonds and 

Administrative Appeal Requirement for 

Breaches. See 85 FR 45968 (July 31, 

2020). The Department is now 

publishing the ratification in the 

Federal Register out of an abundance of 

caution. Neither the ratification nor the 

publication is a statement that the 

ratified action would be invalid absent 

the ratification, whether published or 

otherwise. 

Signed: 

Adam Hunter, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Immigration 

Policy, U.S. Department of Homeland 

Security. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
40920 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

Appendix 

[FR Doc. 2021–16331 Filed 7–29–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9112–FP–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1ER30JY21.002</GPH>

~ 

w;;~.,~~ 

Wll9lml--.bc 2llffi 

Homeland 

Security 

R$iiieatic,noftheY• ·Rule~ &!rely Bonds 

lam~ and~ the· del~ actiootakm by Acting Secretary Wot(,,, 5 u.s.c. 

§ 3348(a)(21 adilted below, to pt()Vidl:: 11ain4ependfflt basis to~ po~ legal 

ehtll~ ton tmat rule~ of a Govenunent Aceountability Offlc:e: (GAO) opwon.ser 

B-l316SO (Omlp~ f.nn •• Aug. l4. 2020) andacli.onsfik,d in~ ct>urt .tlegmgthat the Al)ril 

9. 2019. ordeJ: :of ~on issued by ibmler Secretary Kir$tJen Niellen and the. November a. 

2019torder.oh~ issued :Wfom.~ ~KevtnMe~ werenotvt\iid. 

See, e.g.., Gwtles v, Jl,,re4u ofAkohol$ T~eo, ~. and &p/06hlu. 920 F.34. 1. U (D,C. 

Cit. 2019) ("'We haw: ~Y held that a properly appoin~ ofticial's tatificatioo of m 

~edly improperttfftlJial's priotacticm ••• resolves the claim 011 the merits by rernedy[ift@] the 

defect (if any) fn>tn theinitialappointment.")('mtemal .quotation mm and ciiadcm ~. 

I 1iave full knowledge of th~.lCE Yutal Rule. Procedures t1ml S~d, fot DecUmngSu:rety 

Jinmigratton !Jqnb andA~AJ,pe{ll R~for ~,. awrovedon July t, 

2()20. andlbelieve tllat tbis action was consistentwkh the Department's authorities.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pullman, Washington Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research Docs





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Staff Organizational Chart
- Pullman Facilities
- Central Ferry Farm
- Prosser Facilities
- Frank Dugan

Facilities - Pullman - WSUheadline bar   The Palouse   *Washington State University*  Washington State University CampusThe station at WSU is a cooperative federal/state project managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and is part of the National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS). Physical resources include office and laboratory space in Johnson Hall, several greenhouses and growth chamber rooms, two screenhouses, and 15 field sites across four farms, totaling 36 acres near Pullman.  Pullman Farm   Seed Storage   Central Ferry Farm


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Shakti BHATIA; Randeep Sander, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71843.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 21, 2011.

*220Bart Klein, Law Offices of Bart Klein, Seattle, WA, for Petitioners.

Rosanne Perry, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Seattle, WA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAYY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Shakti Bhatia and Randeep Sander, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Petitioners testified to receiving threats from some of Sander’s family members because of their interfaith marriage, and to an incident in which they, were stopped by Sikhs who demanded Bhatia become Sikh, join their group and move to Punjab, or that he and Sander separate. Even if petitioners were credible, and their asylum application was timely, substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that petitioners failed to demonstrate they were or will be harmed by forces the government of India is unwilling or unable to control. *See Castro-Perez v. Gonzales,*409 F.3d 1069, 1072 (9th Cir.2005). Accordingly, petitioners’ asylum claim fails.

Because petitioners failed to establish eligibility for asylum, they necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See id.*

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of petitioners’ CAT claim because they failed to establish a likelihood of torture by or with the acquiescence of government officials if returned to India. *221*See Arteaga v. Mukasey,*511 F.3d 940, 948-49 (9th Cir.2007).

Finally, petitioners contend the BIA violated due process when it found India’s privacy laws and enforcement of those laws similar to that of the United States. We reject petitioners’ contention because the BIA made no such finding.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
ex_158570.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Certain identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.


 


Addendum No. 1 dated 2021.07.22 to


Contract No. 840/08625142/31/22-21


Date of signature: 2021.03.18


 


THE SELLER


Joint Stock Company «Isotope»,


(JSC «Isotope»)


 


Pogodinskaya str., 22, Moscow, 119435, Russia.


Phone: +7(499) 245-01-18, 245-13-81.


 


THE BUYER


The Company Isoray Medical Inc.


350 Hills Street, Suite 106


Richland, WA 99354-5411 USA


 


THE BUYER and THE SELLERS have mutually agreed about the following:


 


	
			1.

				
			The Manufacturer of the Goods may be the following organization:

			



 


JSC "SSC RIAR", 9, Zapadnoye Shosse, Dimitrovgrad, Ulyanovsk region, 433510,


Russian Federation.


Phone.:+7 (84235) 796 57


e-mail: orip@niiar.ru


 


	
			2.

				
			The Shipper of the Goods may be the following organization:

			



 


MedikorPharma-Ural LLC 620109,  Sverdlovskaya region, Yekaterinburg, Krulya Street, 2, apartment 192 


Tel.: +7 (343) 270-75-29 


E-mail: dpbugaev@gmail.com


 


	
			3.

				
			The total activity of shipments under the Contract on calibration date is increased by [**] and is equal to [**].

			



 


	
			4.

				
			The total amount of the Сontract is increased by [**] and is equal to [**].

			



 


The present addendum is the integral part of contract 840/08625142/31/22-21 and may be signed by E-mail.


 


All other terms and conditions are in accordance with Contract No. 840/08625142/31/22-21, Appendices 1 and 2.


 


	THE SELLER	 	THE BUYER	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Maxim Kushnarev             	 	/s/ Jennifer Streeter               	 
	Maxim Kushnarev	 	Jennifer Streeter	 
	29 Jul 2021  	 	22 Jul 2021	 
	CEO (General Director), JSC Isotope	 	Isoray - COO
#### MOSES NEAL ET AL v. THE UNITED STATES.

(On appeal from 14 C. Cls. R., 280. No opinion by the Supreme Court.)

The Commissioner of Indian Affairs instructs a superintendent to obtain bids foi certain wagon transportation. He does so, and transmits them to the Commissioner. Subsequently he enters into a contract with the lowest bidders, and transmits it to the Commissioner. There is some telegraphic correspondence, leaving it doubtful whether the contract is or is not approved. But after the claimants have prepared to perform, and while they are awaiting freight, the Commissioner notifies them that only 300 tons will be furnished for transportation, instead of the 1,500 tons named in the contract. They sell their wagofi trains and sublet the reduced amount. Subsequently they present a claim for damages, *i. e.,*their actual losses, with a notification that they will seek in court the gains prevented by the defendants’ failure to *757furnish the 1,500 tons. The Department of the -Interior recognizes and approves the claim, with certain deductions, and it is allowed and paid at the Treasury. The claimants now sue for their gains prevented. ,

Held by the Court of Claims:

I. The act of the Department of the Interior in adjusting and approving a claim for damages suffered by reason of a breach of a certain contract entered into by a superintendent of Indian affairs, and the act of the Treasury in allowing and paying the claim so adjusted, amount to a complete ratification of the contract, and do not leave open the question whether it was approved- by the Commissioner of Indian Affairs.

II. Where the defendants were guilty of a breach of their contract in failing to furnish the claimants with a designated quantity of freight, but paid them their actual losses, and-they bring' their action -for gains prevented by the defendants’ breach, all of the transactions will be opened thereby, and the - court will apply the moneys erroneously allowed by the defendants’ officers for losses suffered to the present demand for gains prevented.

The Court of Claims gave judgment for the defendants, dismissing the petition, and the claimants appealed. The Supreme Court affirm the judgment of the Court of Claims without delivering an opinion. -
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                                Subsidiaries of
                           OYO Geospace Corporation


5404339 and More Royalties Company, a Nevada corporation
Concord Technologies, Inc., a Texas corporation
Control Logic, Inc., a Texas Corporation
Geo Space Corporation, a Texas corporation
OYO Geo Space Canada, Inc., an Alberta corporation
OYO Geospace EAME Limited, a United Kingdom company
OYO Geospace International, Inc., a Barbados corporation
OYO Geospace J.V., Inc., a Texas corporation
OYO Instruments, Inc., a Texas corporation
Geospace Engineering Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1)
    
    such Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Plumas Bancorp.
 Date: March 19, 2010
    /s/ D. N. BiddleDouglas N. Biddle, Chief Executive Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-3997

_____________________________

CHARLES ROBINSON,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Union County.

Stanley H. Griffis, III, Judge.

June 7, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and ROWE and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Charles Robinson, pro se, Appellant.

Paul M. Eza and Michael L. Glass of Stone, Glass & Connolly, LLP, 

Jacksonville, for Appellee.
Order entered February 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01060-CV

LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., Appellants

V.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-06786-D

ORDER

We GRANT the February 12, 2015 motion of nonresident attorney, Patricia M. Hamill, 

for admission pro hac vice. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add Patricia M. Hamill as 

counsel pro hac vice.

We GRANT the February 12, 2015 motion of nonresident attorney, Deborah J. 

Krabbendam, for admission pro hac vice. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add Deborah 

J. Krabbendam as counsel pro hac vice.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### SLADE, Appellant, v. DOMINY et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 18, 1907.)

Action by Fannie Slade against Washington T. Dominy and others.

No opinion.' Order affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Heylan Irvine, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), *822rendered October 17, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620; *People v Bigelow,*106 AD2d 448). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.