alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 2/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.002.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 536 January 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.002.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 2

English edition

Legislation

Volume 536 January 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 4/2010 of 5 January 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 5/2010 of 5 January 2010 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 877/2009 for the 2009/10 marketing year | 3 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 6/2010 of 5 January 2010 initiating a review of Council Regulations (EC) No 1292/2007 and (EC) No 367/2006 (imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India, and extending those duties to imports of that product consigned from, inter alia, Israel) for the purposes of determining the possibility of granting an exemption from those measures to one Israeli exporter, repealing the anti-dumping duty with regard to imports from that exporter and making imports from that exporter subject to registration | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EU) No 4/2010 of 5 January 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EU) No 5/2010 of 5 January 2010 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 877/2009 for the 2009/10 marketing year

3

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 6/2010 of 5 January 2010 initiating a review of Council Regulations (EC) No 1292/2007 and (EC) No 367/2006 (imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India, and extending those duties to imports of that product consigned from, inter alia, Israel) for the purposes of determining the possibility of granting an exemption from those measures to one Israeli exporter, repealing the anti-dumping duty with regard to imports from that exporter and making imports from that exporter subject to registration

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
January 8 , 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARVIN BRITTON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00760

- CV V.

MARK JONES , Appellee

_________________ _______________ Today the Court heard appellant’ s motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on August 25, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Marvin Britton. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Lakhwinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-73950.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 20, 2011.

Christopher John Stender, Esquire, Federal Immigration Counselors, Inc., APC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Susan Houser, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*181Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lakhwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Toufighi v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen as untimely where the motion was filed over two years after the BIA’s final decision, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Singh failed to present sufficient evidence of changed circumstances in India to qualify for an exception to the time limit, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); *see also Toufighi,*538 F.3d at 996-97.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s refusal to reopen removal proceedings *sua sponte*to reconsider the agency’s adverse credibility determination. *See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder,*633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir.2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRISANTA HERNANDEZ PARRA, et al.

,

Petitioners,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 72674

Agency Nos. A206

- 910

- 654

A206

- 910

- 968

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 22, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges

Crisanta Hernandez Parra and her granddaughter, natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 29 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 72 674

Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales,

453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9 th Cir. 2006). We deny the pe tition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that petitioners failed

to establish a nexus between past or future harm and a protected ground, including

membership in a particular social group. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1 007,

1015

- 16 (9th Cir. 2010) ; s ee also Ayala v. Holder , 640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir.

2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is established, an applicant

must still show that “persecution was or will be on account of his membership in

such group”) (emphasis in original). Thus, petitioners’ asylum and withholding of

removal claims fail.

Although petitioners reference CAT relief in their statement of issues, they

do not make any arguments challenging the agency’s denial of CAT relief. See

Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not

specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<PAGE>
 
[LETTERHEAD OF TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. APPEARS HERE]





                               November 13, 1996


VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
-------------------
American Artists Film Corp.
1245 Fowler Street, NW
Atlanta, Georgia 30318
Attn: Rex Hauck
Tel: (404)876-7373
Fax: (404)885-9831

     RE: "TARGET EARTH"/TURNER ORIGINAL PRODUCTIONS, INC.
         ("TOP")

Dear Rex:

     This letter, once fully executed, shall constitute an amendment (the
"Amendment") to the agreement ("Agreement") dated October 11, 1996 between TOP
and American Artists Film Corporation ("Producer") relating to the above-
referenced production (the "Program"). In consideration of the mutual promises
contained herein and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, Producer and TOP hereby agree as follows:

  1.   The first sentence of Paragraph I.B. of the Agreement shall be deemed
       deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

          Producer developed a Budget for the Program which does not exceed
          Three Hundred Sixty-Eight Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($368,100).

  2.   Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, all capitalized terms used in
       this Amendment shall have the same meaning as ascribed in the Agreement.

  3.   Except as modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement
       shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the respective
       rights and obligations of the parties.
<PAGE>
 
American Artists Film Corp.
Attn.: Rex Hauck
November 13, 1996
Page 2


     If the foregoing accurately reflects your understanding of this Amendment, 
please sign each of the four (4) enclosed duplicate originals in the spaces 
provided and return them to me for countersignature by an officer of TOP.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    /s/ Lee Brooks Rivera

                                    Lee Brooks Rivera
                                    Assistant General Counsel


Agreed and Accepted by:


AMERICAN ARTISTS FILM CORP.

By: /s/ J. Eric Van Atta
    -----------------------------

Title: Vice President
       --------------------------


TURNER ORIGINAL PRODUCTIONS, INC.

By: /s/ Pat Mitchell
    -----------------------------

Title: President
       --------------------------


LBR: sms

cc:  Pat Mitchell
     Louis Lettes
     George Puckhaber
     Vivian Schiller
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Blount International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Blount International, Inc. and will be retained by Blount International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2011      
|                         
|/s/ Calvin E. Jenness    
|Calvin E. Jenness        
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 8

Providing for the attendance of the House at the inaugural ceremonies of

the President and Vice President of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. SOLOMON submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for the attendance of the House at the inaugural

ceremonies of the President and Vice President of the

United States.

1 Resolved, That at 10:30 a.m. on Monday, January 20,

2 1997, the House shall proceed to the West Front of the

3 Capitol for the purpose of attending the inaugural cere4 monies of the President and Vice President of the United

5 States; and that upon the conclusion of the ceremonies

6 the House stands adjourned until noon on Tuesday, Janu7 ary 21, 1997.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,034,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,764,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                    92,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,937,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,775,394
<PP&E>                                      11,353,775
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,251,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,547,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,588,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       12,359,999
<PREFERRED>                                 48,281,373
<COMMON>                                     3,452,027
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,036,339)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,547,106
<SALES>                                      5,606,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,753,362
<CGS>                                        4,346,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,343,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,882,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                42,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             167,727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (17,472,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (17,472,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (17,472,591)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.53)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

At December 31,2004, consolidated, directly or indirectly, wholly-owned SignificantSubsidiaries of Blount International, Inc. were as follows:
| **NAME OF SUBSIDIARY**     | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **PLACE OF INCORPORATION** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|----------------------------|------------|
| Blount, Inc.                    |       | Delaware   |
| Blount Holdings  Ltd.                |       | Canada     |
| Blount Canada  Ltd.                  |       | Canada     |
| Frederick  Manufacturing Corporation |       | Delaware   |
| Blount Industrial  LTDA              |       | Brazil     |
| Blount Europe,  S.A.                 |       | Belgium    |

 

The names of particular subsidiaries have been omittedbecause when considered in the aggregate or as a single subsidiary they wouldnot constitute a “Significant Subsidiary” as of December 31, 2004.

77

----
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research: Manhattan, KS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Central Small Grain Genotyping Laboratory
                    Units
                        Center for Grain and Animal Health Research: Manhattan, KS
                                    Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit
                                    Grain Quality and Structure Research Unit
                                    Stored Product Insect & Engineering Research UnitSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Manhattan, Kansas Center for Grain and Animal Health Research Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

People and Locations at Manhattan, Kansas   [Expand All] [Collapse All]
  (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### GALLICK, Respondent, v. LEVY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by Stefan Gallick against Max H. Levy and another.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed by default, with costs.
#### Howard *v.*Allgood.

Lumpkin, J.

1. In an action for damages the petition alleged, among other things, as follows: A corporation agreed to sell stock to the plaintiff, with a covenant to resell it at a stated price, if at the expiration of one year the purchaser should be dissatisfied and desire to have it resold. “As a guarantee” of this contract, certain officers and directors of the corporation, in writing, undertook to “sell or take up” the shares in question at the specified price, and assumed the payment of such amount, as a means of inducing the plaintiff to take the stock *551from the 'company. The persons negotiating the trade represented to the plaintiff that those officers and directors were solvent and in good financial and commercial standing, one of them being worth a hundred thousand dollars, another fifty thousand dollars, and a third from five to ten thousand dollars, which representations were false and fraudulent, and, with knowledge of their falseness, were made for the purpose of deceiving the plaintiff and inducing him to take the stock, and did so induce him. The company having failed and gone into bankruptcy, the plaintiff endeavored to communicate with these officers, but they could not be located; and he then found that the representations above mentioned were false, and he thereby lost the amount which he had paid for the stock. *Held,*that such petition was not subject to general demurrer.

June 19, 1915.

Complaint. Before Judge Thomas. Lowndes superior court. August 31, 1914. -

*Neel & Neel,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mundy & Mundy*and *PaUerson & Copeland,*contra.

*(а)*Civil Code (1910) § 4411, dealing with representations to obtain credit for another, does not apply to a transaction like that here involved.

(б) A special demurrer was interposed as to certain allegations of a petition. An amendment was made, striking some of them and altering others, so as to materially change the paragraph to which the special demurrer was directed. A demurrer was again interposed, hut the second demurrer did not include a special demurrer, or again raise the question involved in the former special demurrer, but only relied on the general grounds; and the special ground of the first demurrer will be ■treated as abandoned.

2. There was no error in overruling the demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
** **

**Exhibit 21.1**

** **

**SUBSIDIARIES OF MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS INC.**

 

| **Name of Subsidiary**               | **Jurisdiction of Organization** |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                 |                             |
| MGT Capital Investments (UK) Limited | England and Wales                |
| MGT Investments (Gibraltar) Limited  | Gibraltar                        |
| Medicsight PLC                       | England and Wales                |
| Medicsight Nominees Limited          | England and Wales                |
| Medicexchange PLC                    | England and Wales                |
| Medicexchange Inc.                   | Delaware, USA                    |
| Medictrainer PLC                     | England and Wales                |
| HTTP Tech Inc.                       | New York, USA                    |
| Medical Vision Systems Inc.          | Delaware, USA                    |
|                                 |                             |
| *Subsidiaries of Medicsight PLC*     |                             |
|                                 |                             |
| Medicsight (International) Limited   | Gibraltar                        |
| Medicsight KK                        | Japan                            |
| Medicsight USA Inc.                  | Tennessee, USA                   |
| Medicsight Pty Limited               | Australia                        |
| Medicsight Asset Management Limited  | England and Wales                |
| Chardy Limited                       | England and Wales                |
|                                 |                             |
| *Subsidiaries of Medicexchange Inc.* |                             |
|                                 |                             |
| Medicexchange International Limited  | Gibraltar                        |
| Medicexchange China                  | China                            |
|                                 |                             |
| *Subsidiary of Medicexchange PLC*    |                             |
|                                 |                             |
| Medicexchange (UK) Limited           | England and Wales                |

 

E-1

----