alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mory KOUROUMA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-1108.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 19, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 25, 2011.

Randall L. Johnson, Johnson & Associates, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Lauren E. Fascett, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mory Kourouma, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Kourouma’s motion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re: Kourouma*(B.I.A. Jan. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
NOTIFY
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION





EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Paul
DePond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge, the
Quarterly Report of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Notify Technology
Corporation.





By:
            /s/ Paul F. DePondName:
            Paul F. DePondTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)


Date: May
14, 2009





I,
Gerald W. Rice, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge,
the Quarterly Report of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Notify Technology Corporation.





By:
              /s/ Gerald W. RiceName:
              Gerald
      W. RiceTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)




Date: May
14, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Notify Technology Corporation and will be retained by Notify Technology
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 13.2

 

Credicorp Ltd.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.          Iam the Chief Financial Officer of Credicorp Ltd. (the “Company”).

 

2.          Tomy knowledge:

 

(A)        TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 accompanying this Certification, in the form filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(B)        Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
II

Calendar No. 412

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1104

[Report No. 105–214]

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections in maps relating

to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1997

Mr. HOLLINGS (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, and Mr. THURMOND) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

JUNE 12, 1998

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections

in maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

6 shall make such corrections to the set of maps described
2

S 1104 RS

1 in subsection (b) as are necessary to restore on that map

2 the September 30, 1982, boundary for Unit M09 on the

3 portion of Edisto Island located immediately to the south

4 and west of the Jeremy Cay Causeway.

5 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map described is the map

6 included in a set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Re7 sources System,’’ dated October 24, 1990, that relates to

8 the Unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources Systems enti9 tled ‘‘Edisto Complex M09/M09P’’.

Calendar No. 412

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1104

[Report No. 105–214]

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corResources System. rections in maps relating to the Coastal Barrier

JUNE 12, 1998

Reported without amendment
----

(2004/C 84 E/0738)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0688/04

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(4 March 2004)

Subject:   Application of Regulation No 1788/2003 Article 10(3)

For operational transparency and control reasons, the Azores milk producers' representative bodies have claimed that the calculation of the possible reallocation of the unused parts of the reference quantity be made not only at the level of each buyer and national level, but also at the intermediate level of the regions.

Does the Commission believe that this request contradicts the ‘objective criteria’ referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 Article 10? (1)

Is the Commission aware of any case in which the Member State is going to make use of this intermediate stage in the reallocation of reference quantities?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2004)

Article 10(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector clearly lays down the two ways in which unused quantities are to be reallocated, one exclusively at national level, the other firstly at the level of the purchaser and thereafter at national level where appropriate. This at once rules out any regional stage.

It is for the sake of sound management and so as not to weaken the role of the purchaser that the regional level is not referrred to in Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003.

For deliveries it was agreed to give purchasers prime managerial responsibility for the declaration of milk collected and collection of the additional levy. That is why unused quantities can be reallocated at purchaser level.

Thus the system is not compatible with regionalised management. Purchasers' collection areas are not necessarily bounded by regional borders — they may collect milk in more than one region.

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 123.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7010

ALBERT MOSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; JAMES A.

MCCAULLEY, Director; SWANSON COMMISSARY

SERVICE; RICHLAND COUNTY; HARRIETTE HALL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-97-731-3-19BC)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Mosley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his civil rights action. The district court's

dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar

Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th

Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice could be final if "no

amendment [to the complaint] could cure defects in the plaintiff's

case." Id. at 1067. In ascertaining whether a dismissal without

prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine

"whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending the

complaint." Id. at 1066-67.

Appellant could refile this action and timely follow the district court's orders regarding change of address and notification

of desire to prosecute the action, and demonstrating that the

action is not repetitive. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because we find the dismissal without prejudice is not

appealable.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 323 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1622
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 323 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:1623
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 323 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:1624
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 323 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:1625
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 323 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:1626
Case: 1:02-cv-08700 Document #: 323 Filed: 09/16/11 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:1627
(June 20, 1985)

#### In the Matter of Carl Wess, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Motion by respondent (1) to modify the discipline imposed upon the respondent, on the ground that the discipline imposed was excessive, and (2) to stay the publication in the *New York Law Journal*of the sanction.

Motion denied. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken, O’Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agricultural Water Efficiency and Salinity Research Unit: Riverside, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    US Salinity Lab
                        FAQ about salinity
                                    Publications
                                    History
                                    Scientific ModelsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Publicationsheadline bar AGU Geophysical Monograph 108
               Full USSL Publications Listing
               Special Publications
               Handbook No. 60


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              27,970
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               8,587
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     8,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         12,790
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             283,487
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               282,180
<LOANS>                                          1,164,602
<ALLOWANCE>                                          4,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,556,026
<DEPOSITS>                                       1,182,727
<SHORT-TERM>                                        38,410
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 37,101
<LONG-TERM>                                         88,479
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             2,013
<OTHER-SE>                                         207,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   1,556,026
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     87,333
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   20,269
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       346
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   107,948
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  51,247
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  60,014
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               47,934
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                         (739)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1,260
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     25,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     31,739
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          19,914
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        19,914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        3.29
<LOANS-NON>                                          2,113
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     3,850
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          424
<RECOVERIES>                                         1,760
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    4,716
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 4,716
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Barry DeMartin

Decided February 21, 1990

*Judith A. Sarathy,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Geoffrey E. Marion,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate, Court, 20 Conn. App. 430, is denied.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research: Lincoln, NE
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Plains Area Lincoln, Nebraska Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- ARS News Articles

Robert B Mitchell

(Rob)
                     

                     Research Agronomist


                     Phone: (402) 472-1546
                     
                     

                     Fax: (402) 472-4020
                     Room Forg Lab

                     251 Filley Hall, 3720 East Campus Loop South      
                     UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA(UNL) EAST CAMPUS           
                     

                     LINCOLN                       , NE 68583-093


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In re BOENING.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division. Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

In the matter of William C. Boening.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sami S. Abbasi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ SAMI S. ABBASI                                  
|Sami S. Abbasi President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: August 4, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity  as  an  officer  of  SpaceDev,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  that,  to his
knowledge,  the  Quarterly  Report  of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended  September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 and that the information
contained  in  such  report  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for  the  periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.

Dated:  November  14,  2005

                                   By:  /s/  Richard  B.  Slansky
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Richard  B.  Slansky
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133333 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan JOHN WOLF and DARLENE WOLF, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133333 COA: 270169 Jackson CC: 06-000036-CH HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of March 6, 2007, this Court granted immediate consideration and a stay of trial court proceedings. On order of the Court, the applic ation for leave to appeal the December 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the ques tion presented should be reviewed by this Court. The stay of trial court enforcement proceedings, ordered on March 6, 2007, is DISSOLVED.

l0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk