alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

EXHIBIT 10.2


Schedule of Non-Employee Directors’ Annual Compensation 


Effective June 22, 2021


															
	Annual compensation for Board service

	Role
		Cash
		Equity

	Non-employee directors
		$100,000
		$235,000

	Non-executive Chairman of the Board
		$ --
		$ --

	Lead Independent Director
		$50,000
		$0

					
	Additional compensation for committee service

	Committee
		Chair
		Member

	Audit
		$35,000
		$17,500

	HRCC
		$30,000
		$15,000

	NCG
		$25,000
		$12,500

	Risk Subcommittee
		$25,000*
		$12,500*



**Compensation for the Risk Subcommittee is effective as of July 1, 2021.


Cash compensation is paid in advance in January for the first half of the year and in arrears in December for the second half of the year. The annual retainer and any committee retainer fees are prorated for partial year Board or committee service. Under the Mastercard Incorporated Deferral Plan, US non-employee directors are eligible to defer all or part of their cash compensation into a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement. Directors who elect to defer cash compensation receive earnings on their deferrals based on investment elections. None of the investment options provides returns considered to be above-market or preferential.


Annual stock grants are awarded upon a director's election on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders, are immediately vested with a four-year transfer restriction, and are in the form of restricted stock or deferred stock units. Each director selects the form of his or her award during an annual election process. Directors elected to the board outside of the annual meeting of stockholders are granted a prorated equity award.


Non-employee directors are eligible to have Mastercard make matching gift contributions of up to $15,000 annually to eligible charities in the name of the director. In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to have Mastercard make contributions up to $5,000 to a charity of their choice to match director contributions to Mastercard’s Political Action Committee. Directors are reimbursed for expenses related to attending Board and committee meetings.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center: Pendleton, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Related TopicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pendleton, Oregon Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center People





- Curtis Adams, Plant Physiologist
- Catherine Reardon, Microbiologist
- Vacant, Agronomist
- Hero Gollany, Soil Chemist
- Vacant, Hydrologist
- Stewart Wuest, Soil Scientist

Nicole  Durfee    Research Hydrologist


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 13.2



Credicorp Ltd.



Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:



I am the Chief Financial
Officer of Credicorp Ltd. (the “Company”).



| | 1. | To my knowledge:
| | -- | ----------------



| | (A) | The Company’s Annual
                                         Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 accompanying this Certification,
                                         in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
                                         fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                                         Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | The information in the Report
                                         fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                                         of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: April 28, 2015   |                        
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|By:  /S/ FERNANDO DASSO |                        
|Name:                   | Fernando Dasso         
|Title:                  | Chief Financial Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.5


Amendment No. 2
to the
Earthstone Energy, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan


This Amendment No. 2 to the Earthstone Energy, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”) was approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of Earthstone Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on May 28, 2021, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company, which was obtained on July 20, 2021. Accordingly, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of July 20, 2021, as follows:


1.    The first sentence of Section 3.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“Subject to the limitations set forth herein, 12,000,000 shares of Common Stock are reserved for issuance pursuant to Awards made under this Plan.”




In all other respects, the Plan remains unchanged and in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan has been executed to be effective as of July 20, 2021.




EARTHSTONE ENERGY, INC.




By: /s/ Robert J. Anderson
Name: Robert J. Anderson
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 

136049 

DANA McCLUNG, 

Plaintiff, 

v 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 SC: 136049 

 AGC: 3276/07 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, 

and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the 

requested relief. 

p0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

BEA SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of BEA Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark P. Dentinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

Date: November 15, 2007



By:

/s/ Mark P. DentingerMark P. Dentinger Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act and implementing regulations, the Department of the Air Force hereby gives notice of its intent to grant an exclusive patent license agreement to Palladium Labs, a C-Corporation, having a place of business at 126 Thomas Street NW, Washington, DC 20001.

# DATES:

Written objections must be filed no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the date of publication of this Notice.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit written objections to Matthew O'Brien, RDOX, Technology Transfer Office, Directed Energy Directorate, 3550 Aberdeen Avenue, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117-5776; Telephone: 505-846-5028; Email:                         *matthew.obrien.27@us.af.mil.*                         Include Docket No. PRS283 in the subject line of the message.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Shannon Carr, RDOX, Technology Transfer Office, Directed Energy Directorate, 3550 Aberdeen Avenue, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117-5776; Telephone: 505-321-3542; Email:                         *shannon.carr.3.ctr@us.af.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Department of the Air Force intends to grant the exclusive patent license agreement for the invention described in: U.S. 10,715,615, entitled “Dynamic Content Distribution System and Associated Methods,” issued 14 July 2020.

The Department of the Air Force may grant the prospective license unless a timely objection is received that sufficiently shows the grant of the license would be inconsistent with the Bayh-Dole Act or implementing regulations. A competing application for a patent license agreement, completed in compliance with 37 CFR 404.8 and received by the Air Force within the period for timely objections, will be treated as an objection and may be considered as an alternative to the proposed license.

Adriane Paris,

Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-16351 Filed 7-30-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Nos. 333-20165, 333-20167, 333-64083, 333-68176, and 333-152573 onForm S-8 of our reports dated November 4, 2010, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Northwest Pipe Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement discussed in Note 2), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on internal control over financialreporting because of material weaknesses), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northwest Pipe Company and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

November 4, 2010
II

Calendar No. 541

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1016

[Report No. 105–302]

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in New

Jersey, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14, 1997

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. TORRICELLI) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

SEPTEMBER 8 (legislative day, AUGUST 31), 1998

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail

Route in New Jersey, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

4 Section 6 of Public Law 100–515 (16 U.S.C. 1244

5 note) is amended—
2

S 1016 RS

1 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking

2 ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$4,000,000’’; and

3 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘five’’ and in4 serting ‘‘10’’.

Calendar No. 541

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1016

[Report No. 105–302]

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritpurposes. age Trail Route in New Jersey, and for other

SEPTEMBER 8 (legislative day, AUGUST 31), 1998

Reported without amendment
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.110



                      EXTENSION LETTER FOR PROMISSORY NOTES
                          DATED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998


         This Extension Letter hereby amends those certain Promissory Notes
listed below by and between American Artists Film Corporation (therein called
"Obligor") and Rex Hauck, (therein called "Holder") and extends the due dates of
said Promissory Notes for a period of 365 days with all principal and any
accrued but unpaid interest due on or before December 31, 1999.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Date of Promissory Note    Amount of Promissory Note
         -----------------------    -------------------------
<S>      <C>                        <C>        
(1)      As of July 31, 1997              $ 10,468.00
(2)      April 17, 1995                   $ 17,500.00
(3)      August 15, 1994                  $  4,499.00
(4)      February 1, 1994                 $  2,603.28
(5)      December 31, 1993                $ 19,696.51
</TABLE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Extension Letter to
be duly executed under the seal on the date and year first above written.

                                        "OBLIGOR"



                                        By:     /s/ ROBERT MARTINEZ
                                          -------------------------------------
                                           American Artists Film Corporation
                                           1245 Fowler St., N.W.
                                           Atlanta, Georgia 30318

"HOLDER"



     /s/ REX HAUCK             
-----------------------------
Rex Hauck
# Official Journal C 416/28 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 416 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6528 October 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 416

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6528 October 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 416/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 416/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 7 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 416/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 416/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 24

- 00163

- CV

JOHN B. ERICKSON

, Appellant

v.

VIJAY KASIREDDY

, Appellee

From the 66th District Court

Hill County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV686

- 21DC

MEMORANDUM OPINION

John B. Erickson appealed the trial court ’s order granting a special appearance. He

now moves to dismiss the appeal, asserting the parties have reached a settlement

agreement. Erickson’s motion is unopposed.

Accordingly, “Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss” is granted, and this

appeal is dismissed. Further, there being an agreement of the parties as to costs, all costs

of this proceeding are taxed against the party incurring same.

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticeErickson v. Kasireddy Page 2 Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Motion granted

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 19, 2024

[CV 0 6]
<PAGE>
 
        [LETTERHEAD OF AMERICAN ARTISTS FILM CORPORATION APPEARS HERE]


October 31, 1996

Atlantic International Capital, Ltd.
2200 Corporate Boulevard
Suite 317
Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Attn:  Mr. Norman Hoskin, Chairman and
       Mr. Richard Iammuno, President

Re:    Agreement dated September 27, 1996


       This letter will confirm the termination, effective immediately and 
without penalty, of such agreement between Atlantic International Capital, Ltd. 
and American Artists Film Corporation dated September 27, 1996.


Very Truly,

American Artists Film Corporation

By: /s/ Steven D. Brown
    -----------------------
    Chief Executive Officer


Acknowledged and Accepted by:

Atlantic International Capital, Ltd.

By: /s/ Richard Iammuno
    ------------------------
    Richard Iammuno

Title: President and CEO
      ----------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerald Smith, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered July 15, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant’s belated argument at the suppression hearing raising a question as to whether probable cause existed to arrest defendant did not preserve the issue for review as a matter of law *(People v Smith,*108 AD2d 763; *People v Jones,*81 AD2d 22). We further find that our intervention in the interest of justice is unwarranted.

The hearing court’s determination that defendant’s statement to the police and his subsequent videotaped confession were voluntarily made is supported by the evidence in the record and should, therefore, be upheld *(see, People v Armstead,*98 AD2d 726).

With respect to defendant’s contention that the court erroneously refused to discharge three prospective jurors after he challenged them for cause, we find that as to the venireman whose brother had been killed in a fight, any error was waived when counsel failed to exercise an available peremptory challenge and codefendant’s counsel never refused to consent to the same (CPL 270.20 [2]; *People v Foster,*100 AD2d 200, *mod on other grounds*64 NY2d 1144). Nor is there any merit to defendant’s claim regarding the two prospective jurors who were bus drivers employed by the New York City Transit Authority. Merely because the murder took place in a subway station and one of the People’s witnesses was the token booth clerk on duty at the time does not indicate that such persons would be unlikely to render an impartial verdict *(see, People v Provenzano,*50 NY2d 420).

The court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded all witnesses, including defendant’s mother, from the courtroom during the trial, after she had heard the testimony of all but two of the witnesses who testified at the trial. It is clear that the court had the inherent power to do so *(People v Jelke,*308 NY 56, 63), even where members of the defendant’s family are concerned *(People v Joseph,*59 NY2d 496). However, at no time were spectators in general denied access to the courtroom. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.