alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Celedonio VARGAS-VIVAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-72592.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 13, 2011.

Alma David, Rios Cantor, P.S., Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Sara Bergene, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Celedonio Vargas-Vivar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal based on his failure to establish the requisite hardship to his qualifying United States citizen children.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that Vargas-Vivar did not demonstrate “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,” and Vargas-Vivar has not presented a colorable constitutional claim for us to review. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:02-cv-09246 Document 90 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 11 of 11
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38732-38733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4502-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]


District of Columbia; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major 
Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the District of Columbia (FEMA-4502-DR), dated March 29, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on July 6, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, MaryAnn 
Tierney, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Janice P. Barlow as

[[Page 38733]]

Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-15623 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:273
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:274
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:275
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:276
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:277
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:278
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:279
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:280
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:281
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:282
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:283
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:284
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:285
Case: 1:02-cr-00892 Document #: 44-2 Filed: 11/26/02 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:286
----

(2004/C 78 E/0003)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3463/02

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(6 December 2002)

Subject:   Economic integration

Will the Commission state the value of profits and dividends paid to non-residents in each Member State for each year of the last five years, and will it further express that figure as a percentage of total business profits in each Member State, excluding profits remitted outside the Member State?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(27 January 2003)

The Commission has calculated the value of profits and dividends paid to non-residents for the years/Member States that enough information was available to perform such calculations.

The Commission has also calculated, when feasible, the percentage they represent in total business profits, excluding profits remitted outside the Member States.

All data available are given in the table sent direct to the Honourable Member and to the Parliament's secretariat.

----
#### Friend *et al.*v. Roth *et al.*

No. 296.

Opinion Filed May 12, 1909.

(102 Pac. 185.)

1. COURTS — Supreme Court — Jurisdiction—Appeals from Territorial Courts. Section IS of the enabling act (Act June 16, 1906, c. 3335, 34 Stat. 277) confers upon the Supreme Court of the state just such jurisdiction to review judgments rendered and entered in actions in the United States courts of the Indian Territory prior to the admission of the state from which no appeal had been taken as the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory could have taken if it had not been dissolved by the advent of statehood.

2. SAME — Time of Taking Appeals'. A judgment in an action in a United States court of the Indian Territory, rendered and entered *865less than six months before the admission of the state, may be reviewed by this court on appeal taken within six months from the entry of such judgment.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

*Appeal from, the United States Court for the Western District of the Indian Territory at Tulsa; William R. Lawrence, Judge.*

Action by J. A. Friend and others against Nora B. Roth and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

Dismissed.

P. *L. Thurman*and *Gibson & Ramsey,*for appellants.

*J. L. Harnage,*for appellees..

Hayes, J.

This is an action in equity brought by appellants in the United States Court for the Western District of the Indian Territory at Tulsa, wherein judgment was rendered by that court on the 23d day of July, 1907, dismissing plaintiffs’ petition. The judgment was on that date entered. On the 17th day of July, 1908, plaintiffs presented to the Honorable Chief Justice of this court their petition praying an appeal from said judgment, which was allowed, and on the 18th day of July, 1908, the transcript' of the record in the case in the trial court was filed in this court. A motion to dismiss has been filed by the defendants upon the ground that it was not brought within the time provided by law in force in the Indian Territory at the time of the rendition and entry of the judgment in the court below.

This question was directly presented to and passed upon by this court in *Moberly v. Roth et al.*(decided at this term of court), *ante,*p. 856, 102 Pac. 182, wherein the question was- de-. cided favorably to the contention now made by defendants in their motion.

The reasoning and conclusion of the court in that case is applicable to this case, and the motion to dismiss is therefore sustained.

All the Justices concur.
Case: 1:01-cv-00698 Document #: 121 Filed: 01/27/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:406

Case: 1:01-cv-00698 Document #: 121 Filed: 01/27/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:407
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6363.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 2, 2011.

*969Nathan Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph John Bernard, Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathan Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Premier Holding Corp.(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jasmine Gregory, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending  March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Date:  September 9, 2010 | Jasmine Gregory
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen P. Kuchen, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PacificHealth
Laboratories, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

DATE: March 29, 2006            By: /s/ Stephen P. Kuchen
                                    ---------------------
                                Stephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-28-1998
<CASH>                                           1,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,072)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,454
<PP&E>                                          44,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,850)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 218,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (37,601)
<BONDS>                                      (139,132)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        (5)
<COMMON>                                           (4)
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,524)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (218,453)
<SALES>                                       (41,178)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (41,178)
<CGS>                                           17,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   195
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (17)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 13
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       313
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.83)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agricultural Water Efficiency and Salinity Research Unit: Riverside, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    US Salinity Lab
                        FAQ about salinity
                                    Publications
                                    History
                                    Scientific ModelsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Databasesheadline bar FGS Crops
               GF Crops
               Boron Tolerance of Crops
               Boron Adsorption Data
               Arsenic and Selenium Adsorption Data


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lawrence McBride, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), imposed February 8, 1985.

Sentence affirmed. No opinion.

This case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff and Fiber, JJ., concur.
Document

EXHIBIT 10h




Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013
Attention: Richard Rivera




June 1, 2021


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Re: Extension of Maturity Date


Reference is made to the Five Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2012 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified prior to the date hereof, the “Credit Agreement”) among Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation  (the “Company”), the Borrowing Subsidiaries, the lenders parties thereto (the “Lenders”), certain Agents, Citibank , N.A., as an Administrative Agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as an Administrative Agent. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Credit Agreement.


Pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Credit Agreement, the Company hereby requests that the Lenders extend the Maturity Date in effect on the date hereof (i.e., July 30, 2025) such that the extended Maturity Date under the Credit Agreement will be July 30, 2026. This letter shall constitute an “Extension Letter” as referred to in Section 2.5 of the Credit Agreement. 




						
	
	
	BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
		
		
		
		/s/ Sandra Ramos-Alves
		Name: Sandra Ramos-Alves
		Title: Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the 1995 Long-Term Incentive and Stock Option Plan and the
1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan of Stockwalk.com Group Inc. of our
report dated May 3, 2000, except for Note 12 as to which the date is June 7,
2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Stockwalk.com Group, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended March 31, 2000.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


June 29, 2000
Exhibit 32.2 - Certification of Principal Financial Officer



CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Internet America, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sandra T. Everett, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sandra T. EverettSandra T. EverettController and Chief Accounting OfficerDate: September 28, 2004