alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         17,418
<SECURITIES>                                   30,503
<RECEIVABLES>                                  55,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                    2,360
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              111,269
<PP&E>                                         18,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                131,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          44,613
<BONDS>                                         1,493
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       81,458
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  131,136
<SALES>                                        86,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              146,963
<CGS>                                          17,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  60,678 <F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               85,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,846
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (804)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (804)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES ONE-TIME CHARGES OF $15.6 MILLION IN CONNECTION WITH THE
INTERACTIVE ACQUISITION.
</FN>





</TABLE>
#### Jorge Campoverde, Respondent, v Alberto Parejas, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 895]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gavrin, J.), entered August 26, 2011, as, after a hearing, denied that branch of his motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

At a hearing to determine the validity of service of process upon the defendant, the plaintiff established that the process server could not be compelled with due diligence to attend the hearing and, therefore, his affidavit constituted admissible prima facie evidence of service pursuant to CPLR 308 (4) *(see*CPLR 4531; *Koyenov v Twin-D Transp., Inc.,*33 AD3d 967, 969 [2006]; *Deitsch v Fischer,*246 AD2d 623 [1998]). Furthermore, the plaintiffs proof disclosed that the defendant was served at the residence address of the owner of the subject vehicle listed on the registration record maintained by the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles. In rebuttal, the defendant testified that he no longer lived at the address listed on the registration record and had moved from that address more than four years before service of the summons and complaint. As the registered owner of the subject vehicle, the defendant was required to notify the Commissioner of any change of residence within 10 days of the change *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 401 [3]). A party who fails to comply with this provision is estopped from challenging the propriety of service made at the former address *(see Kalamadeen v Singh,*63 AD3d 1007 [2009]; *Cruz v Narisi,*32 AD3d 981 [2006]; *Labozzetta v Fabbro,*22 AD3d 644, 645 [2005]). The hearing record in this case supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the defendant was properly *1252served at the residence address maintained on the Commissioner’s registration record for the owner of the subject vehicle, and we discern no basis for disturbing that determination (see *Lopez v DePietro,*82 AD3d 715, 716 [2011]; *American Home Mtge. v Villaflor,*80 AD3d 637 [2011]; *Federal Fin. Co. v Public Adm’r, Kings County,*47 AD3d 881, 882 [2008]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
#### Marco Stefan UNEPUTTY; Debby Engeline, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-74057.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 22, 2011.

Albert C. Lum, Sr., Esquire, Law Office of Albert C. Lum, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioners.

Remi Adalemo, Trial, Rachel Louise Browning, Trial, OIL, Luis E. Perez, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Marco Stefan Uneputty and Debby Engeline, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider where the motion was untimely and petitioners failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s previous decision affirming an immigration judge’s removal order. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1), (2).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to grant petitioners’ motion to reconsider sua sponte. *See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder,*633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir.2011).

In light of our disposition, we need not address petitioners’ remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Echo Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick T. Mooney, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.


Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.


Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board





August 16, 2010
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

Subsidiaries of 

OYO Geospace Corporation 

 

Geospace Technologies, LP, a Texas limitedpartnership 

Geospace Technologies Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP, a Texas limited partnership 

Concord Technologies, LP, a Texas limited partnership 

OYOG, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

OYOG Limited Partner, LLC, aNevada limited liability company 

OYOG Operations, LP, a Texas limited partnership 

OYO Geospace China, a Chinese company 

OYO Geo Space Canada, Inc., an Alberta corporation 

OYO Instruments, LP, a Texas limited partnership 

OYO Instruments EuropeLimited, a United Kingdom company 

OYO Geospace J.V., LP, a Texas limited partnership 

OYO-GEO Impulse International, LLC, a Russian limited liability company
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to the best of my knowledge; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by
the Report and results of operations for the Company for the period covered by the
Report.
  /s/ David W. Odell

David W. OdellChief Financial Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pullman, Washington Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research Docs





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Staff Organizational Chart
- Pullman Facilities
- Central Ferry Farm
- Prosser Facilities
- Frank Dugan

Facilitiesheadline bar  *Western Regional Plant Introduction Station - Pullman, WA*  The Palouse Washington State University Pullman Farm Seed Storage Central Ferry Farm  *National Temperate Forage Legume Genetic Resources Unit - Prosser, WA* H.P. Singleton Unit Roza Farm Unit Laboratory


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Water Management Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Commodity Protection and Quality Research
                                    Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Water Management Research People & Locations





- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- Research Team
- Research Team 1
- Research Team 2
- Gao and Wang Research
- Gao and Banuelos Research
- Dong Wang - Research Leader
- James Ayars
- Gary Banuelos
- Suduan Gao
- James Gerik
- Ruijun Qin

Suduan  Gao
                     

                     RES SOIL SCNTST
                     


                        ProjectsImproving Soil and Water Productivity and Quality in Irrigated Cropping Systems
                                       In-House Appropriated

                                                   (D)Accession Number: 441662


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Document

Exhibit 10.1B




AMENDMENT #2


TO PHARMACY SERVICES MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Amendment #2 to Pharmacy Master Services Agreement (“Amendment”), effective as of the last date signed below (the “Effective Date”), is made pursuant to the terms of the Pharmacy Services Master Services Agreement (“Agreement”), effective as of July 1, 2020 between Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Jazz Pharmaceuticals”) and Express Scripts Specialty Distribution Services, Inc. (“ESSDS”) (individually, “Party” and collectively, “Parties”), the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Whereas, ESSDS intends to relocate the fulfillment operations of the Certified Pharmacy.


Now therefore, in consideration of the above recital, which is incorporated by this reference, the mutual promises and covenants set forth below, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:




1.    Exhibit B hereby deleted and replaced in its’ entirety with Exhibit B below.
2.    In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms and provisions of the Agreement and the terms and provisions of this Amendment, the terms and provisions of this Amendment will govern and prevail. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, this Amendment does not in any way change, modify or delete the provisions of the Agreement (or the Parties’ rights, remedies or obligations thereunder), and all such provisions shall remain in full force and effect. On and after the Amendment Effective Date, each reference in the Agreement to “this Agreement,” “hereunder,” “hereof,” “herein,” or words of like import, and each reference to the Agreement in any other agreements, documents or instruments executed and delivered pursuant to the Agreement, shall mean and be a reference to the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.




















1













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, by signature of their respective duly authorized representatives below, the Parties have agreed to this Amendment as of the Effective Date.






									
	EXPRESS SCRIPTS SPECIALTY DISTRIBUTIONS SERVICES, INC. 		JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	By:  Joshua B Parker                       
		By:  /s/ Debra Feldman                   

	Signature:  /s/ Joshua B. Parker      
		Signature:   Debra Feldman            

	Title:           VP                                 
		Title:   VP, Pharmacovigilance        

	Date:     7/13/2021 |  3:52 PM CDT  
		Date:   19-Jul-2021                          

			
	              RPM for JLD  7.13.21		
			
			




2











Exhibit B


ESSDS LOCATIONS




Express Scripts Building 3 4600 North Hanley Rd. Suite B St. Louis, MO 63134


Express Scripts Building 6 4700 North Hanley Rd. St. Louis, MO 63134
3
# Official Journal L 344/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.344.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 344 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5619 December 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.344.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 344

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5619 December 2013

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision 2013/755/EU of 25 November 2013 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union (‘Overseas Association Decision’) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision 2013/755/EU of 25 November 2013 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union (‘Overseas Association Decision’)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

Record of Vote of Meeting Closure

(Public Law 94-409) (5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b)

    I, Patricia K. Cushwa, Acting Chairman of the United States Parole 
Commission, was present at a meeting of said Commission, which started 
at approximately 2:30 p.m., on Tuesday, July 13, 2021, at the U.S. 
Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, Third Floor, Washington, DC 20530. 
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss an original jurisdiction case 
pursuant to 28 CFR 2.25. and 28 CFR 2.68(i)(1) Two Commissioners were 
present, constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was 
submitted.
    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of the General Counsel that this meeting may 
be closed by votes of the Commissioners present were submitted to the 
Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion 
duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted 
that the meeting be closed: Patricia K. Cushwa and Charles T. 
Massarone.
    In witness whereof, I make this official record of the vote taken 
to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to 
the public.

Patricia K. Cushwa,
Acting Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-15788 Filed 7-20-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
#### In the Matter of Juelle G., Appellant, v William C., Respondent.

[949 NYS2d 13]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Carol J. Goldstein, Ref.), entered on or about February 17, 2011, which granted respondent father’s motion to dismiss the petition to modify a prior order of the same court (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about May 15, 2007, which awarded custody of the parties’ daughter to respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to petitioner, we find that petitioner failed to make a prima facie showing that modification of the custody order is warranted on any of the grounds alleged in the petition *(see Matter of Patricia C. v Bruce L.,*46 AD3d 399, 399 [2007]; *David W. v Julia W.,*158 AD2d 1, 6-7 [1990]). The record contains no evidence, or even an allegation, that the child was neglected or otherwise inadequately cared for during the relevant time period of May 2007 to May 2008. There is no evidence either that the child was diagnosed with depression or that there is any other basis for concluding that she required therapy during the relevant time period. There is no evidence that respondent thwarted efforts by the supervising agency to arrange for the child to join in visits by petitioner’s other children. The record does not establish verbal abuse warranting a modification of custody. Given the court order forbidding petitioner to telephone the child during the relevant time period, respondent’s refusal to permit the child to call petitioner using his cell phone does not constitute a substantial change of circumstances. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Metalline Mining Company (the "Company")
        on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Merlin D. Bingham,
        President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
        Merlin D. Bingham
 President
 
 
 Dated:
        September 15, 2005
   E-4