alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-334, OMB Control No. 3235-0380]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form F-10

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form F-10 (17 CFR 239.40) is a registration statement under the 
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) that may be used by a 
foreign private issuer that: Is incorporated or organized in Canada; 
has been subject to, and in compliance with, Canadian reporting 
requirements for at least 12 months; and has an aggregate market value 
of common stock held by non-affiliates of at least $75 million. The 
purpose of this information collection is to permit verification of 
compliance with securities law requirements and assure the public 
availability of such information. We estimate that Form F-10 takes 
28.98 hours per response and is filed by 77 respondents. We further 
estimate that 25% of the 28.98 hours per response (7.25 hours) is 
prepared by the issuer for an annual reporting burden of 558 hours 
(7.25 hours per response x 77 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom, 
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, 
c/o Cynthia Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by 
sending an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91c1c3d0cedcf0f8fdf3fee9d1e2f4f2bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95c5c7d4cad8f4fcf9f7faedd5e6f0f6bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 15, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15431 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



EXHIBIT 4.22 Supplement to Executive Board Contract Dated March 8, 1996 Dear Professor Heinrich, In relation to your executive board contract dated March 8, 1996 and your reappointment on October
17, 2000, the compensation committee decided on the following supplements to your executive board
contract at its meeting on October 17, 2000: Article 4 Term
Duties at the end of this contract Article 4 (1), paragraph 2 The following provision is added:
Thereafter it will extend by the duration of the reappointment unless terminated by either of the
parties giving not less than nine months written notice to the other before it expires. Article 4 (2) If during the term of this contract Prof. Heinrich becomes permanently unable to work, this
contract will end at the end of the quarter in which the permanent inability to work was
determined. The following sentence is added:However, compensation payments will end not before expiry of the
12-month period starting on the day on which the permanent inability to work was determined. For the purposes of this contract, a permanent inability to work would be if Prof. Heinrich were
unable to perform his work during a period of more than oneyear and it were not expected that he
be able to start work again within the following six months. Article 4 (4) The following provision is added:Provisions governing early dismissal or termination If Prof. Heinrich is dismissed from the executive board, this contract is deemed terminated. If
this contract is terminated or his appointment as an executive board member is revoked, SAP can
suspend Prof. Heinrich from his duties with immediate effect. If he is not suspended, SAP will
continue to pay his salary (basic annual salary and directors profit-sharing bonus) until the
contract expires. If he is suspended, SAP will only continue to pay his basic annual salary.




---



##### 



-2- Article 7
Retirement and dependents pension plan The following provision is added:
If Prof. Heinrich dies, payment of compensation will continue during the three months following his
death. Walldorf, February 12, 2001 /s/ DIETMAR HOPP
    
    /s/ CLAUS HEINRICHThe supervisory board
Represented by its chairperson
    
    Prof. Dr. Claus Heinrich
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JENI PORCHE, MARGARET L. HOSTY, and )

d/b/a GSU INNOVATOR )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. ) Case No.: 02 C 7707

)

ROGER ODEN, et al, ) The Honorable Ronald A. Guzman 

 ) Judge Presiding

Defendants. )

) Magistrate Judge Nan R. Nolan

NOTICE OF FILING

To: Jeri Porche’ Margaret Hosty

257 Juniper Street 956 Elder Road

Park Forest, Illinois 60466 Homewood, Illinois 60430

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thursday, November 3, 2005, the attached

APPEARANCE was filed with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division, at 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

LISA MADIGAN s/Janet M. Fasano 

Attorney General of Illinois JANET M. FASANO

Assistant Attorney General

General Law Bureau

100 West Randolph Street, 13 floor th

Chicago, Illinois 60601

(312) 814-5159

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney certifies that a copy of the attached Appearance was served upon

the pro se plaintiffs at the address indicated, by mail, postage pre-paid, by depositing same in the

U.S. mail located at 100 West Randolph Street, Chicago, IL 60601, on the 3 day of November, rd

2005. 

s/Janet M. Fasano 

Assistant Attorney General

Case: 1:02-cv-07707 Document #: 129 Filed: 11/03/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:635
EXHIBIT32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

David E. Hershberg, Chief Executive Officer ofGlobecomm Systems Inc., and Andrew C. Melfi, Chief Financial Officer ofGlobecomm Systems Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that the quarterly report of Globecomm Systems Inc. onForm 10-Q for the three months ended September  30,  2006(the ‘‘Quarterly Report’’) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in theQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Globecomm SystemsInc.

|                         |  |  |                                        |
|-------------------------|--|--|----------------------------------------|
| Date:November  9,  2006 |  |  | By: /s/ DAVID E.HERSHBERG              |
|                    |  |  | David E.Hershberg                      |
|                    |  |  | Chairman of the Boardand               |
|                    |  |  | Chief ExecutiveOfficer                 |
|                    |  |  | By: /s/ANDREW C. MELFI                 |
|                    |  |  | Andrew C.Melfi                         |
|                    |  |  | Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer |
|                    |  |  | andTreasurer                           |
|                         |

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to GlobecommSystems Inc. and will be retained by Globecomm Systems Inc. andfurnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002
(18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted), James W. Benson, Chief Executive Officer
of  SpaceDev,  Inc.  (the  "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

     The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and the information
contained  in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

     IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of this
___  day  of  May  2003.





     James  W.  Benson
     CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER



<PAGE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15411]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2114]

Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 76 Under Alternative Site 
Framework, Bridgeport, Connecticut

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Board to grant to qualified 
corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or 
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    Whereas, the Bridgeport Port Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade 
Zone 76, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-24-2021, 
docketed March 19, 2021) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with 
a service area of Fairfield and Litchfield Counties as well as a 
portion of New Haven County, Connecticut, in and adjacent to the 
Bridgeport Customs and Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 76's 
existing Site 5 would be categorized as a magnet site, and existing 
Subzone 76A would become a subzone under the ASF;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (86 FR 15887, 3/25/2021) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 76 under the ASF is approved, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the 
zone, to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate 
authority for Site 5 if not activated within five years from the month 
of approval, and to an ASF sunset provision for subzone/usage-driven 
sites that would terminate authority for each existing site of Subzone 
76A if no foreign-status merchandise is admitted to the site for a bona 
fide customs purpose within three years from the month of approval.

    Dated: July 15, 2021.
Christian B. Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-15411 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
(15 Misc. Rep. 122.)

#### MURPHY v. McWILLIAM et al.

(Common Pleas of New York City and County,

General Term.

December 27, 1895.)

Trial—Objections to Evidence—Failure to Lay Foundation.

In an action to recover for injuries caused by the fall of a derrick, evidence of the weight of a certain stone, whose position and dimensions were shown on a diagram of the premises, and evidence that a derrick such as that used by defendant was insufficient to support a stone of that weight, was erroneously received, it not being shown that such stone was the one actually in process of hoisting at the time of the accident.

*493Appeal from special term.

Action by John Murphy against Robert McWilliam and others for personal injuries. From a judgment entered on a verdict in. favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.

Reversed.

Argued before DALY, C. J., and BISCHOFF and PRYOR, JJ.

Abm. J. Elkus, for appellants.

Thos. M. North, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

For error in the reception of certain evidence, which might very clearly have prejudiced the appellants, we are constrained to reverse this judgment. The plaintiff sought to charge the defendants with an injury sustained by him through the fall of a derrick used by them in hoisting and placing stone for a certain building, upon the erection of which building plaintiff was employed, but by another contractor, and in a different class of work. In support of his case the plaintiff offered in evidence a diagram, made a few days after the accident, showing the position of a certain stone upon the scene of operations, in the course of the hoisting of which it was claimed that the derrick gave way, and the dimensions of this stone, as it appeared upon the diagram, were shown. Under objection and exception taken by the appellants upon the ground that the stone in question had not been proven to be that actually in process of hoisting at the time of the accident, a witness was permitted to testify that such a stone weighed 8J tons; and thereupon an expert was called by the plaintiff, who gave evidence—still under like objection and exception—that a derrick such as that used by the defendant was insufficient in strength *to*support a stone of that weight. At no time, although counsel had promised to connect it, was any foundation for this evidence given during the trial; and while it may be, as claimed, that, apart from the plaintiff’s proof, the jury might have found an inference of negligence from the defendants’ own evidence, they were certainly not bound to do so, since the matter was quite open to question; and we cannot say that this unauthorized form of proof, as given by the plaintiff, did not have an effect upon the verdict. The point was fully raised by the defendants when the plaintiff rested, and, although a nonsuit could not, upon the evidence, have well been directed at the close of the whole case, the error in the reception of the testimony noted was at no time-cured, nor were the jury instructed to disregard such testimony.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements accompanying the filings of Form 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                          919,648
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 4,063,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                    114,750
<INVENTORY>                                   3,581,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              8,483,330
<PP&E>                                          996,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                  390,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                9,163,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,829,448
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                      5,229,740
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1,342,856)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  9,163,068
<SALES>                                       3,911,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              3,911,669
<CGS>                                         2,773,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 3,965,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 52,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               53,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (105,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (105,612)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (105,612)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.02)
                                             

</TABLE>
Case 10-00098 Doc 64 Filed 06/16/11 Entered 06/16/11 15:49:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 8
Case 10-00098 Doc 64 Filed 06/16/11 Entered 06/16/11 15:49:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 8
Case 10-00098 Doc 64 Filed 06/16/11 Entered 06/16/11 15:49:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 8
Case 10-00098 Doc 64 Filed 06/16/11 Entered 06/16/11 15:49:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 8
Case 10-00098 Doc 64 Filed 06/16/11 Entered 06/16/11 15:49:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 8
Case 10-00098 Doc 64 Filed 06/16/11 Entered 06/16/11 15:49:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 8
Case 10-00098 Doc 64 Filed 06/16/11 Entered 06/16/11 15:49:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 8
Case 10-00098 Doc 64 Filed 06/16/11 Entered 06/16/11 15:49:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 8
# C_2021148EN.01001701.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/17

---

Order of the General Court of 16 February 2021 — Ungureanu v Commission

(Case T-753/19) (1)

(Action for damages - Law governing the institutions - Alleged unlawfulness stemming from the failure to bring an action for a declaration of a failure to fulfil obligations under Article 258 TFEU - Discretionary power of the Commission - Action manifestly inadmissible)

(2021/C 148/23)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Simeda Ungureanu (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) (represented by: R. Chiriţă, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and M. Carpus Carcea, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the infringement by the Commission of its obligation to ensure that Romania complies with the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Simeda Ungureanu shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Simeda Ungureanu shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.

---
# Official Journal L 232/4 Se

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 232 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 504 September 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 232

English edition

Legislation

Volume 504 September 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNAL RULES AND RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | Instructions to the Registrar of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 5 July 2007 | 1 |
| | * | Practice Directions to Parties | 7 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

INTERNAL RULES AND RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

Instructions to the Registrar of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 5 July 2007

1

*

Practice Directions to Parties

7

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# CE2004065EN.01022301.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/223 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/223

---

(2004/C 65 E/237)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2818/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(19 September 2003)

Subject:   Commitment and absorption of Cohesion Fund appropriations for Greece in 2003

Subject:

Can the Commission provide information on the current situation as regards the commitment and absorption of Cohesion Fund appropriations for Greece in 2003? Does the Commission consider the situation to be satisfactory?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(21 October 2003)

(21 October 2003)

The Commission can inform the Honourable Member that, as at 30 September 2003, commitments for Greece in 2003 under the Cohesion Fund were EUR 167 million, to which a further EUR 29 million currently being implemented can be added, plus an additional amount of around EUR 53 million for new projects at the final examination stage.

The Commission has requested the Greek authorities to submit new applications for part-financing as quickly as possible so that EUR 612 million, which is the indicative amount that Greece is supposed to commit under the 2003 budget, can be committed. The Greek authorities have reconfirmed their intention of submitting sufficient new applications very shortly to meet the EUR 612 million target.

---