alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hyperion Solutions Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey R. Rodek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2003

/s/ JEFFREY R. RODEK
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. VALENTINO BOL MAJAK, Defendant - Appellant. No. 11-10386D.C. No. 4:10-cr-03004-RCCBPV-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 15, 2012 ** San Francisco, California Before: TALLMAN, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Valentino Bol Majak appeals his convi ctions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(vii), and fleeing from an 

# FILED
OCT 17 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 immigration checkpoint, 18 U.S.C. § 758. He argues that the district court erred in admitting expert testimony to show that he knowingly possessed the marijuana. Majak was apprehended after fleeing from a Border Patrol checkpoint at high speed; approximately 400 pounds of marijuana was found in the trunk of his car. Majak testified that he did not know how the marijuana got there and suggested that Border Patrol agents must have placed it there after his arrest. An expert in drug trafficking testified for the Government that drug traffickers do not typically use unknowing couriers to transport drugs. We review a district court’s d ecision admitting drug-courier expert testimony for abuse of discretion. United States v. Sepulveda-Barraza , 645 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2011). The district court did not abuse its discretion in this case. Expert drug-courier testimony “is admissible when relevant, probative of a defendant's knowledge, and not unfairly prejudicial.” Id. at 1072. The testimony here was relevant because Majak disavow ed knowledge as to how the marijuana got into his trunk. Majak’s suggestion that the Border Patrol agents may have placed the marijuana there did not render the expert testimony irrelevant. See United States v. Cordoba , 104 F.3d 225, 229 (9th Cir. 1997) (noting that expert testimony about unknowing couriers is ge nerally probative of the defendant’s3 knowledge of possession (citing United States v. Castro, 972 F.2d 1107, 1111 (9th Cir. 1992)). AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-K COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES,
INC. FOR YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 3, 1997
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000564
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1997
<CASH>                                           2,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,457
<PP&E>                                          79,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,990
<BONDS>                                        131,534
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           17,566
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,396
<SALES>                                        253,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               253,439
<CGS>                                          183,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  183,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 350/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 350 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6431 August 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 350

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6431 August 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 350/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10415 — Black Diamond/Specialty Chemicals International) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 350/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10307 — Oxford Properties/M7 Real Estate) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 350/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10415 — Black Diamond/Specialty Chemicals International) (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 350/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10307 — Oxford Properties/M7 Real Estate) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 350/03 | Euro exchange rates — 30 August 2021 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 350/03

Euro exchange rates — 30 August 2021

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Vv.

No. O1 CR 1115

ALFREDO LONGORIA and
LEONEL DURAN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants. )
MEMQRANDUM_ ORDER
This Court has just received the unpublished June 20, 2005
order from our Court of Appeals that (1) affirmed the convictions
of Alfredo Longoria (“Longoria”) and Leonel Duran (“Duran”) but

(2) issued a limited remand order as to their sentences, as

prescribed by United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 483-84

(7 Cir. 2005). From this Court’s review of its retained
materials in this case, it regards the likelihood of imposing the
same sentence on Duran as questionable at best and is uncertain
as to Longoria’s situation in that respect. In any event,
counsel for the government and for Longoria and Duran are ordered
to file contemporaneous submissions in this Court’s chambers on
or before July 8, 2005, at which point this Court will determine

what further proceedings may be necessary.

Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge

Date: June 23, 2005
Exhibit 99

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Dale G. Rettinger, the Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership

A West Virginia Limited Partnership

By: Petroleum Development Corporation

Managing General Partner

By: _/s/ Dale G. Rettinger___________________

Name: Dale G. Rettinger

Title: Chief Financial Officer of

Petroleum Development Corporation

Date: __October 31, 2002_________________
BLUEFLY, INC.
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bluefly, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
C. Barry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Patrick C. Barry
-----------------------
Patrick C. Barry
Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2004
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 3, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00995

- CR

DAMON KENDRICK DOVE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12

- DCR

- 061181A

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from the trial court’s “Order on Intervenor’s
Petition In Intervention and Motion to Unseal Court Records

. ” Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant when there has been a final judgment of conviction. See Workman v. State , 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961); McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). The order on appe al is not a final judgment of conviction.
On January 23 , 2020 , we notified the parties that the appeal would be2

dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. No response has been received.

W e dismiss the a

ppeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.

Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 214 

Designating the week of June 24 through 28, 2011, as ‘‘National Music 

Education Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2011 

Mrs. MURRAY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of June 24 through 28, 2011, as 

‘‘National Music Education Week’’. 

Whereas the National Association for Music Education has 

designated the week of June 24 through 28, 2011, as 

‘‘National Music Education Week’’; 

Whereas school-based music education is important and beneficial for students of all ages; 

Whereas music education programs enhance intellectual development and enrich the academic environment for students of all ages; 

Whereas 3 out of every 4 Americans have participated in 

music education programs, including chorus groups and 

formal instrument lessons, during their time in school; 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 214 IS 

Whereas of those who have participated in school-based music 

education programs, 40 percent stated that such programs were extremely influential in contributing to their 

current level of personal fulfillment; 

Whereas music education provides students with the opportunity to express their creativity and to develop skills 

that will benefit them throughout the rest of their lives; 

Whereas the skills gained through music instruction, including discipline and the ability to analyze, solve problems, 

communicate, and work cooperatively, are vital for success in the 21st century workplace; 

Whereas many students have limited access to music education, which places them at a disadvantage compared to 

their peers; 

Whereas local budget cuts are predicted to lead to a significant curtailment of school music programs, thereby depriving millions of students of an education that includes 

music; 

Whereas the arts are a core academic subject, and music is 

an essential element of the arts; and 

Whereas every student in the United States should have an 

opportunity to reap the benefits of music education: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of 

2 June 24 through 28, 2011, as ‘‘National Music Education 

3 Week’’ in order to recognize the benefits and importance 

4 of music education. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Maria Berry, Appellant, v Angelo Chiodo Heating & Air Conditioning, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 713]

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), entered November 17, 2010. The order reversed in part and affirmed in part a judgment of the Syracuse City Court (Karen M. Uplinger, J.), entered April 26, 2010, and remitted for further proceedings.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Fahey and Sconiers, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Lawrence S. Barker, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report of Visual Networks, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2004                                    
|                                                        
|/s/ Lawrence S. Barker                                  
|                                                        
|Lawrence S. Barker President and Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal C 350/28 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 350 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6128 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 350

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6128 September 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 350/01 | Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors — Annual accounts of the European Development Fund 2017 | 1 |
| 2018/C 350/02 | The Court’s statement of assurance to the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs to the European Parliament and the Council Independent auditor’s report | 149 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 350/01

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors — Annual accounts of the European Development Fund 2017

1

2018/C 350/02

The Court’s statement of assurance to the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs to the European Parliament and the Council Independent auditor’s report

149

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:310

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:311

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 3 of 11 PageID #:312

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 4 of 11 PageID #:313

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:314

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 6 of 11 PageID #:315

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 7 of 11 PageID #:316

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 8 of 11 PageID #:317

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 9 of 11 PageID #:318

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 10 of 11 PageID #:319

Case: 1:01-cv-08729 Document #: 77  Filed: 12/30/02 Page 11 of 11 PageID #:320
Exhibit
13.1
 
 Credicorp
Ltd.
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350)
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:
 
 1.           I
am the Chief Executive Officer of Credicorp Ltd. (the “Company”).
 
 2.           To
my knowledge:
 
 (A)        The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009
accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (B)         The
information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
June 17, 2010
 
 By: /s/ DIONISIO ROMERO P.Name:  Dionisio
      RomeroTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer
#### Terry Kirk CAMPBELL, Petitioner—Appellant, v. George A. NEOTTI, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 08-55902.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 13, 2011.

Terry Kirk Campbell, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Terry Kirk Campbell appeals the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Campbell contends that the Board of Parole’s 2004 decision to deny him parole was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights. The only federal right at issue in the parole context is procedural, and the only *308proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not whether the state court decided the case correctly. *Swarthout v. Cooke,*— U.S.-,-, 131 S.Ct. 859, 863, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011); *Roberts v. Hartley,*640 F.3d 1042, 1045-47 (9th Cir.2011) (applying Cooke). Because Campbell raises no federal procedural challenges, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.