Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Notices 41821 

10See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic 

of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 53691 (September 10, 

2014). 

1See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from 

Vietnam entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

SeAH VINA, a zero cash deposit rate; (2) 

for previously investigated or reviewed 

Vietnamese and non-Vietnamese 

exporters not listed above that received 

a separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most-recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the exporter was reviewed; (3) for 

all Vietnamese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the Vietnam-wide entity, 

which is 111.47 percent; 10 and (4) for 

all non-Vietnamese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the Vietnamese 

exporter that supplied that nonVietnamese exporter with the subject 

merchandise. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: July 27, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Adverse Facts Available 

Comment 2: Surrogate Country 

Comment 3: Financial Statements 

Comment 4: Brokerage and Handling 

Comment 5: Inland Freight 

Comment 6: Differential Pricing 

Comment 7: Water 

Comment 8: Section 232 Duties 

Comment 9: Ministerial Errors 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–16474 Filed 8–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) has received requests to 

conduct administrative reviews of 

various antidumping duty (AD) and 

countervailing duty (CVD) orders and 

findings with June anniversary dates. In 

accordance with Commerce’s 

regulations, we are initiating those 

administrative reviews. 

DATES: Applicable August 3, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations, 

Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 

(202) 482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various AD and CVD orders and 

findings with June anniversary dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

Commerce discussed below refer to the 

number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting time. 

Notice of No Sales 

If a producer or exporter named in 

this notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the period of 

review (POR), it must notify Commerce 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. All 

submissions must be filed electronically 

at https://access.trade.gov, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.1 Such 

submissions are subject to verification, 

in accordance with section 782(i) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served 

on every party on Commerce’s service 

list. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event Commerce limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, Commerce 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the 

POR. We intend to place the CBP data 

on the record within five days of 

publication of the initiation notice and 

to make our decision regarding 

respondent selection within 35 days of 

publication of the initiation Federal 

Register notice. Comments regarding the 

CBP data and respondent selection 

should be submitted within seven days 

after the placement of the CBP data on 

the record of this review. Parties 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
41822 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Notices 

2See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, 

Pubic Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015). 

3Such entities include entities that have not 

participated in the proceeding, entities that were 

preliminarily granted a separate rate in any 

currently incomplete segment of the proceeding 

(e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new 

shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their 

separate rate in the most recently completed 

segment of the proceeding in which they 

participated. 

wishing to submit rebuttal comments 

should submit those comments within 

five days after the deadline for the 

initial comments. 

In the event Commerce decides it is 

necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act, the 

following guidelines regarding 

collapsing of companies for purposes of 

respondent selection will apply. In 

general, Commerce has found that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (e.g., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will 

not conduct collapsing analyses at the 

respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this AD proceeding 

(e.g., investigation, administrative 

review, new shipper review, or changed 

circumstances review). For any 

company subject to this review, if 

Commerce determined, or continued to 

treat, that company as collapsed with 

others, Commerce will assume that such 

companies continue to operate in the 

same manner and will collapse them for 

respondent selection purposes. 

Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse 

companies for purposes of respondent 

selection. Parties are requested to (a) 

identify which companies subject to 

review previously were collapsed, and 

(b) provide a citation to the proceeding 

in which they were collapsed. Further, 

if companies are requested to complete 

the Quantity and Value (Q&V) 

Questionnaire for purposes of 

respondent selection, in general, each 

company must report volume and value 

data separately for itself. Parties should 

not include data for any other party, 

even if they believe they should be 

treated as a single entity with that other 

party. If a company was collapsed with 

another company or companies in the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding where Commerce 

considered collapsing that entity, 

complete Q&V data for that collapsed 

entity must be submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that has requested a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that Commerce may 

extend this time if it is reasonable to do 

so. Determinations by Commerce to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Deadline for Particular Market 

Situation Allegation 

Section 504 of the Trade Preferences 

Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act 

by adding the concept of a particular 

market situation (PMS) for purposes of 

constructed value under section 773(e) 

of the Act.2 Section 773(e) of the Act 

states that ‘‘if a particular market 

situation exists such that the cost of 

materials and fabrication or other 

processing of any kind does not 

accurately reflect the cost of production 

in the ordinary course of trade, the 

administering authority may use 

another calculation methodology under 

this subtitle or any other calculation 

methodology.’’ When an interested 

party submits a PMS allegation pursuant 

to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce 

will respond to such a submission 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v). 

If Commerce finds that a PMS exists 

under section 773(e) of the Act, then it 

will modify its dumping calculations 

appropriately. 

Neither section 773(e) of the Act nor 

19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v) set a deadline 

for the submission of PMS allegations 

and supporting factual information. 

However, in order to administer section 

773(e) of the Act, Commerce must 

receive PMS allegations and supporting 

factual information with enough time to 

consider the submission. Thus, should 

an interested party wish to submit a 

PMS allegation and supporting new 

factual information pursuant to section 

773(e) of the Act, it must do so no later 

than 20 days after submission of initial 

responses to section D of the 

questionnaire. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (NME) countries, Commerce 

begins with a rebuttable presumption 

that all companies within the country 

are subject to government control and, 

thus, should be assigned a single 

antidumping duty deposit rate. It is 

Commerce’s policy to assign all 

exporters of merchandise subject to an 

administrative review in an NME 

country this single rate unless an 

exporter can demonstrate that it is 

sufficiently independent so as to be 

entitled to a separate rate. 

To establish whether a firm is 

sufficiently independent from 

government control of its export 

activities to be entitled to a separate 

rate, Commerce analyzes each entity 

exporting the subject merchandise. In 

accordance with the separate rates 

criteria, Commerce assigns separate 

rates to companies in NME cases only 

if respondents can demonstrate the 

absence of both de jure and de facto 

government control over export 

activities. 

All firms listed below that wish to 

qualify for separate rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as 

appropriate, either a separate rate 

application or certification, as described 

below. For these administrative reviews, 

in order to demonstrate separate rate 

eligibility, Commerce requires entities 

for whom a review was requested, that 

were assigned a separate rate in the 

most recent segment of this proceeding 

in which they participated, to certify 

that they continue to meet the criteria 

for obtaining a separate rate. The 

Separate Rate Certification form will be 

available on Commerce’s website at 

https://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/ 

nme-sep-rate.html on the date of 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. In responding to the 

certification, please follow the 

‘‘Instructions for Filing the 

Certification’’ in the Separate Rate 

Certification. Separate Rate 

Certifications are due to Commerce no 

later than 30 calendar days after 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. The deadline and requirement 

for submitting a Certification applies 

equally to NME-owned firms, wholly 

foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers 

who purchase and export subject 

merchandise to the United States. 

Entities that currently do not have a 

separate rate from a completed segment 

of the proceeding 3 should timely file a 

Separate Rate Application to 

demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. In addition, 

companies that received a separate rate 

in a completed segment of the 

proceeding that have subsequently 

made changes, including, but not 

limited to, changes to corporate 

structure, acquisitions of new 

companies or facilities, or changes to 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Notices 41823 

4Only changes to the official company name, 

rather than trade names, need to be addressed via 

a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding new trade names may be submitted via a Separate 

Rate Certification. 

their official company name,4 should 

timely file a Separate Rate Application 

to demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. The Separate 

Rate Application will be available on 

Commerce’s website at https://

enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-seprate.html on the date of publication of 

this Federal Register notice. In 

responding to the Separate Rate 

Application, refer to the instructions 

contained in the application. Separate 

Rate Applications are due to Commerce 

no later than 30 calendar days after 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. The deadline and requirement 

for submitting a Separate Rate 

Application applies equally to NMEowned firms, wholly foreign-owned 

firms, and foreign sellers that purchase 

and export subject merchandise to the 

United States. 

Exporters and producers must file a 

timely Separate Rate Application or 

Certification if they want to be 

considered for respondent selection. 

Furthermore, exporters and producers 

who submit a Separate Rate Application 

or Certification and subsequently are 

selected as mandatory respondents will 

no longer be eligible for separate rate 

status unless they respond to all parts of 

the questionnaire as mandatory 

respondents. 

Initiation of Reviews: In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are 

initiating administrative reviews of the 

following AD and CVD orders and 

findings. We intend to issue the final 

results of these reviews not later than 

June 30, 2022. 

Period to be Reviewed 

AD Proceedings 

GERMANY: Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel, A–428–845 .......................................... 6/1/20–5/31/21 

Benteler Distribution International GmbH 

Benteler Steel/Tube GmbH 

Mubea Fahrwerksfedern GmbH 

Salzgitter Mannesmann Line Pipe GmbH 

Salzgitter Mannesmann Precision GmbH 

INDIA: Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel, A–533–873 .................................................. 6/1/20–5/31/21 

Tube Products of India, Ltd., a unit of Tube Investments of India Limited (collectively ‘‘TPI’’) 

INDIA: Glycine, A–533–883 ................................................................................................................................................. 6/1/20–5/31/21 

Avid Organics Private Limited 

GEM Corpochem Private Limited 

Indiana Chem-Port 

J.R. Corporation 

Kumar Industries 

Mulji Mehta Enterprises 

Mulji Mehta Pharma 

Paras Intermediates Private Ltd. 

Rexisize Rasayan Industries 

Rudraa International 

Studio Disrupt 

INDIA: Quartz Surface Products, A–533–889 ..................................................................................................................... 12/13/19–5/31/21 

Alicante Surfaces Pvt., Ltd. 

Antique Granito Shareholders Trust 

Antique Marbonite Private Limited 

Argil Ceramic Private Limited 

Argil Ceramics 

ARO Granite Industries Limited 

Asian Granito India Ltd 

Baba Super Minerals Pvt. Ltd. 

Camrola Quartz Limited 

Chaitanya International Minerals LLP 

Chariot International Pvt. Ltd. 

Colors Of Rainbow 

Creative Quartz LLP 

Cuarzo 

Divyashakti Granites Limited 

Esprit Stones Pvt., Ltd. 

Global Stones Private Limited 

Globalfair Technologies Pvt. 

Glowstone Industries Private Limited 

Gupta Marbles 

Gyan Chand Lodha 

Hi Elite Quartz LLP 

Hilltop Stones Pvt., Ltd. 

Inani Marbles and Industries Ltd. 

International Stones India Private Limited 

Jennex Granite Industries 

Jessie Kan Granite Inc. 

Keros Stone LLP 

M.B. Granites Private Ltd. 

Mahi Granites Private Limited. 

Malbros Marbles & Granites Industries 

Marudhar Rocks International Pvt. Ltd. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
41824 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Notices 

Period to be Reviewed 

Mountmine Imp. & Exp. Pvt., Ltd. 

P.M. Quartz Surfaces Pvt., Ltd. 

Pacific Industries Limited 

Pacific Quartz Surfaces LLP 

Pangaea Stone International Private Ltd. 

Paradigm Granite Pvt., Ltd. 

Paradigm Stone India Private Limited 

Pelican Quartz Stone 

Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited 

Prism Johnson Limited 

Quartzkraft LLP 

Rocks Forever 

Rose Marbles Ltd. 

Safayar Ceramics Private Ltd. 

Satya Exports 

Shivam Enterprises 

Southern Rocks and Minerals Private Limited 

Stone Imp. & Exp. (India) Pvt., Ltd. 

Stoneby India LLP 

Sunex Stones Private Ltd. 

Tab India Granites Pvt., Ltd. 

Ultima International 

Vishwas Ceramic 

Vishwas Exp. 

Yash Gems 

ITALY: Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel, A–475–838 .................................................. 6/1/20–5/31/21 

Dalmine S.p.A. 

Metalfer SpA 

JAPAN: Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure (over 41⁄2 inches), A–588–850 ................................ 6/1/20–5/31/21 

JFE Shoji Corporation 

JFE Steel Corporation 

K and I Tubular Corporation 

K I Tubular Corporation 

K&I Tubular Corporation 

Kanematsu Corporation 

Mitsui & Co Ltd 

Mitsui & Co., Ltd (SAS) 

Mitsui and Co., Ltd 

Okaya & Co., Ltd 

Sumitomo Corporation 

JAPAN: Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure (under 41⁄2 inches), A–588–851 .............................. 6/1/20–5/31/21 

JFE Shoji Corporation 

JFE Steel Corporation 

K and I Tubular Corporation 

K I Tubular Corporation 

K&I Tubular Corporation 

Kanematsu Corporation 

Mitsui & Co Ltd 

Mitsui & Co., Ltd (SAS) 

Mitsui and Co., Ltd 

Okaya & Co., Ltd 

Sumitomo Corporation 

JAPAN: Glycine, A–588–878 ............................................................................................................................................... 6/1/20–5/31/21 

Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd. 

Nagase & Co., Ltd. 

Showa Denko K.K. 

Yasunaga Trading Co., Ltd. 

SPAIN: Finished Carbon Steel Flanges, A–469–815 ......................................................................................................... 6/1/20–5/31/21 

Aleaciones De Metales Sinterizados S.A. 

Central Y Almacenes 

Farina Group Spain 

Friedrich Geldbach Gmbh 

Grupo Cunado 

Transglory S.A. 

Tubacero, S.L. 

ULMA Forja, S.Coop 

SWITZERLAND: Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel, A–441–801 .................................. 6/1/20–5/31/21 

Benteler Rothrist AG 

Mubea Inc. 

Mubea Pra ̈zisionsstahlrohr AG 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Chlorinated Isocyanurates, A–570–898 ............................................................ 6/1/20–5/31/21 

Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. 

Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Tapered Roller Bearings, A–570–601 ............................................................... 6/1/20–5/31/21 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Notices 41825 

Period to be Reviewed 

C&U Group Shanghai Bearing Co., Ltd. 

Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd. 

GGB Bearing Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou C&U Automotive Bearing Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou C&U Metallurgy Bearing Co., Ltd. 

Hebei Xintai Bearing Forging Co., Ltd 

Huangshi C&U Bearing Co., Ltd 

Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. 

Sichuan C&U Bearing Co., Ltd. 

Xinchang Newsun Xintianlong Precision Bearing Manufacturing Co., Ltd 

Zhejiang Jingli Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof,5 A–570–106 ........ 10/9/19–3/31/21 

Hangzhou Hoca Kitchen & Bath Products Co., Ltd. 

Linyi Bonn Flooring Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

TURKEY: Large Diameter Welded Pipe,6 A–489–833 ....................................................................................................... 5/1/20–4/30/21 

Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 

TURKEY: Quartz Surface Products, A–489–837 ................................................................................................................ 12/13/19–5/31/21 

Belenco Dis Ticaret A.S. 

CVD Proceedings 

INDIA: Glycine, C–533–884 ................................................................................................................................................ 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Avid Organics Private Limited 

Indiana Chem-Port 

J.R. Corporation 

Kumar Industries 

Mulji Mehta Enterprises 

Mulji Mehta Pharma 

Paras Intermediates Private Ltd. 

Rexisize Rasayan Industries 

Rudraa International 

Studio Disrupt 

INDIA: Quartz Surface Products, C–533–890 ..................................................................................................................... 10/11/19–12/31/20 

Antique Marbonite Pvt. Ltd. 

Argil Ceramics 

ARO Granite Industries Limited 

Baba Super Minerals Pvt. Ltd. 

Camrola Quartz Limited 

Cuarzo 

Divyashakti Granites Limited 

Esprit Stones Pvt. Ltd. 

Global Stones Pvt. Ltd. 

Hi Elite Quartz LLP, India 

Keros Stone LLP 

Mahi Granites Pvt. Ltd. 

Malbros Marbles & Granites Industries 

Pacific Industries Limited 

Pacific Quartz Surfaces LLP 

Paradigm Stone India Pvt. Ltd. 

Pelican Quartz Stone 

Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited 

Rocks Forever 

Satya Exports 

Shivam Enterprises 

Southern Rocks and Minerals Pvt. Ltd 

Sunex Stones Private Limited, India 

Tab India Granites Private Limited, India 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Glycine, C–570–081 .......................................................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

A.H.A. International Co., Ltd. 

Aqua Bond Inc. 

Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd. 

Beijing Lanjian Xingda Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd. 

Elementis, Srl, Inc. 

Hebei Changhao Biotechnology Co., Ltd. 

Hebei Pushi Yongdao Trade Co., Ltd. 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: High Pressure Steel Cylinders, C–570–978 ...................................................... 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Beijing Tianhai Industry Co., Ltd. 

Tianjin Tianhai High Pressure Container Co., Ltd.7

Langfang Tianhai High Pressure Container Co., Ltd 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof,8 C–570–107 ........ 8/12/19–12/31/20 

Hangzhou Hoca Kitchen & Bath Products Co., Ltd. 

Linyi Bonn Flooring Manufacturing Co., Ltd 

TURKEY: Large Diameter Welded Pipe,9 C–489–834 1/1/20–12/31/20 

Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 

TURKEY: Quartz Surface Products, C–489–838 ................................................................................................................ 10/11/19–12/31/20 

Belenco Dis Ticaret A.S. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
41826 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Notices 

5The initiation notice published on June 11, 2021 

(86 FR 31282) listed the names of two companies 

incorrectly. The names were incorrectly listed as 

Hangzhou Hoco Kitchen & Bath Products Co., Ltd. 

and Linyi Bonn Flooring Manufacture Co., Ltd. 

However, the correct spellings are Hangzhou Hoca 

Kitchen & Bath Products Co., Ltd. and Linyi Bonn 

Flooring Manufacturing Co., Ltd. as listed in this 

initiation notice. See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Wooden Cabinets 

and Vanities and Components Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China; Correction to Company 

Names,’’ dated July 20, 2021. 

6 In the initiation notice that published on July 6, 

2021 (86 FR 35481), Commerce omitted Borusan 

Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 

(Borusan). We note that subject merchandise 

produced and exported by Borusan was excluded 

from the order effective June 1, 2020. See Large 

Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Turkey: 

Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

Amended Final Determination in the Less-ThanFair-Value Investigation; Notice of Amended Final 

Determination Pursuant to Court Decision; and 

Notice of Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 

in Part, 85 FR 35262, 35264 (June 9, 2020). 

Commerce also stated in this notice that it would 

not initiate any new reviews of Borusan’s entries. 

Accordingly, we are initiating this administrative 

review with respect to Borusan only for subject 

merchandise produced in Turkey where Borusan 

acted as either the manufacturer or exporter (but not 

both). 

7This company is also known as Tianjin Tianhai 

High Pressure Corp., Ltd. 

8The initiation notice published on June 11, 2021 

(86 FR 31282) listed the names of two companies 

incorrectly. The names were incorrectly listed as 

Hangzhou Hoco Kitchen & bath Products Co., Ltd. 

and Linyi Bonn Flooring Manufacture Co., Ltd. 

However, the correct spellings are Hangzhou Hoca 

Kitchen & Bath Products Co., Ltd. and Linyi Bonn 

Flooring Manufacturing Co., Ltd. as listed in this 

initiation notice. See Husch Blackwell LLP’s Letter, 

‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities from the People’s 

Republic of China: Name Corrections,’’ dated July 

23, 2021. 

9 In the initiation notice that published on July 6, 

2021 (86 FR 35481), Commerce omitted Borusan 

Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 

(Borusan). We note that subject merchandise 

produced and exported by Borusan was excluded 

from the order. See Large Diameter Welded Pipe 

From the Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty 

Order, 84 FR 18771, 18772 (May 2, 2019). 

Accordingly, we are initiating this administrative 

review with respect to Borusan only for subject 

merchandise produced in Turkey where Borusan 

acted as either the manufacturer or exporter (but not 

both). 

10See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also the frequently asked 

questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 

https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_

info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 11See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020). 12See section 782(b) of the Act; see also Final 

Rule; and the frequently asked questions regarding 

the Final Rule, available at https://

enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_

final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 

13See 19 CFR 351.302. 

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

Duty Absorption Reviews 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an AD order under 19 

CFR 351.211 or a determination under 

19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an 

order or suspended investigation (after 

sunset review), Commerce, if requested 

by a domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine whether AD duties have been 

absorbed by an exporter or producer 

subject to the review if the subject 

merchandise is sold in the United States 

through an importer that is affiliated 

with such exporter or producer. The 

request must include the name(s) of the 

exporter or producer for which the 

inquiry is requested. 

Gap Period Liquidation 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

‘‘gap’’ period of the order (i.e., the 

period following the expiry of 

provisional measures and before 

definitive measures were put into 

place), if such a gap period is applicable 

to the POR. 

Administrative Protective Orders and 

Letters of Appearance 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with the procedures 

outlined in Commerce’s regulations at 

19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures 

apply to administrative reviews 

included in this notice of initiation. 

Parties wishing to participate in any of 

these administrative reviews should 

ensure that they meet the requirements 

of these procedures (e.g., the filing of 

separate letters of appearance as 

discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). 

Factual Information Requirements 

Commerce’s regulations identify five 

categories of factual information in 19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are 

summarized as follows: (i) Evidence 

submitted in response to questionnaires; 

(ii) evidence submitted in support of 

allegations; (iii) publicly available 

information to value factors under 19 

CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the 

adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 

351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on 

the record by Commerce; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)–(iv). These regulations 

require any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also 

provide specific time limits for such 

factual submissions based on the type of 

factual information being submitted. 

Please review the Final Rule,10 available 

at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

2013/1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to 

submitting factual information in this 

segment. Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.11

Any party submitting factual 

information in an AD or CVD 

proceeding must certify to the accuracy 

and completeness of that information 

using the formats provided at the end of 

the Final Rule.12 Commerce intends to 

reject factual submissions in any 

proceeding segments if the submitting 

party does not comply with applicable 

certification requirements. 

Extension of Time Limits Regulation 

Parties may request an extension of 

time limits before a time limit 

established under Part 351 expires, or as 

otherwise specified by Commerce.13 In 

general, an extension request will be 

considered untimely if it is filed after 

the time limit established under Part 

351 expires. For submissions which are 

due from multiple parties 

simultaneously, an extension request 

will be considered untimely if it is filed 

after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. 

Examples include, but are not limited 

to: (1) Case and rebuttal briefs, filed 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual 

information to value factors under 19 

CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the 

adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 

351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification 

and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments 

concerning the selection of a surrogate 

country and surrogate values and 

rebuttal; (4) comments concerning CBP 

data; and (5) Q&V questionnaires. Under 

certain circumstances, Commerce may 

elect to specify a different time limit by 

which extension requests will be 

considered untimely for submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, 

Commerce will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Notices 41827 

1See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and 

Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy, 61 FR 

38547 (July 24, 1996) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

54983 (September 3, 2020). 

3See Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 86 FR 7700 (February 1, 2021). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘2019–2020 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Certain Pasta from 

Italy: Respondent Selection,’’ dated October 15, 

2020. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Affiliation and 

Collapsing Memorandum for Liguori Pastificio dal 

1820 S.p.A. and Pastificio della Forma S.r.l,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Pasta: Extension of 

Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019/2020,’’ dated 

March 2, 2021. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain 

Pasta from Italy; 2019–2020,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

8See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews 

in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 16. 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This policy also 

requires that an extension request must 

be made in a separate, stand-alone 

submission, and clarifies the 

circumstances under which Commerce 

will grant untimely-filed requests for the 

extension of time limits. Please review 

the Final Rule, available at https://

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ 

html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 

submitting factual information in these 

segments. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: July 29, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–16497 Filed 8–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–818] 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

pasta (pasta) from Italy, covering the 

period July 1, 2019, through June 30, 

2020. We preliminarily determine that 

La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana) sold 

pasta from Italy at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

and that Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 

S.p.A. (Liguori) and Pastificio Della 

Forma S.r.l. (Della Forma) did not sell 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the POR. Interested parties 

are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable August 3, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jonathan Hall-Eastman and John 

Hoffner, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1468 

and (202) 482–3315, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 24, 1996, Commerce 

published the AD order in the Federal 

Register.1 On September 3, 2020, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

Commerce initiated an administrative 

review of the Order covering the 

following companies: Agritalia S.r.L., 

Armonie D’Italia srl, F. Divella S.p.A., 

La Molisana, Liguori, Pasta Castiglioni, 

Pasta Zara, S.p.A, Pastificio Della Forma 

S.r.l. (Della Forma), Pastificio C.A.M.S. 

Srl, and Pastificio Fratelli De Luca S.r.l, 

and Rummo S.p.A. (Rummo).2 On 

February 1, 2021, Commerce rescinded 

the review of Rummo and its subsidiary 

Pasta Castiglioni.3 On October 15, 2010, 

we selected La Molisana and Liguori for 

individual examination in this review.4

Further, we have preliminarily 

collapsed Liguori and Della Forma and 

have considered these two companies to 

constitute a single entity.5

On March 2, 2021, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results to July 30, 2021.6

For a complete description of the events 

that followed the initiation of this 

review, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.7

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are certain pasta from Italy. For a full 

description of the scope, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. Export price was calculated 

in accordance with section 772 of the 

Act. Normal value was calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/index.html. A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. 

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

determination of a weighted-average 

dumping margin for individual 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when determining the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which we did not examine 

in an administrative review. Section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act establishes a 

preference to avoid using rates which 

are zero, de minimis, or based entirely 

on facts available in calculating an allothers rate. Accordingly, Commerce’s 

practice in an administrative review has 

been to average the weighted-average 

dumping margins for the companies 

selected for individual examination in 

the administrative review, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available.8 For the 

preliminary results of this review, we 

calculated a weighted-average dumping 

margin for La Molisana that is not zero, 

de minimis or based entirely on facts 

available, while we have calculated a 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Liguori/Della Forma that is de minimis. 

Therefore, consistent with our practice, 

we have determined the weightedaverage dumping margin for the 

companies not selected for individual 

examination that is equal to the 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES