alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas W. Davison, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sontra Medical Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 9, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas W. Davison                
|Thomas W. Davison                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer





23
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 291 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 291

 Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival 
                               of Diwali.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 12, 2011

 Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Warner, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. 
 Brown of Ohio, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Casey, Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, 
and Mr. Merkley) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

             October 21 (legislative day, October 20), 2011

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival 
                               of Diwali.

Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian Americans and South 
        Asian Americans, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, and Jains 
        throughout India, the United States, and the world;
Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants light small oil 
        lamps, place the lamps around the home, and pray for health, knowledge, 
        peace, wealth, and prosperity in the new year;
Whereas the lights symbolize the light of knowledge within the individual that 
        overwhelms the darkness of ignorance, empowering each celebrant to do 
        good deeds and show compassion to others;
Whereas Diwali falls on the last day of the last month in the lunar calendar and 
        is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving for the homecoming of the Lord 
        Rama and worship of Lord Ganesha, the remover of obstacles and bestower 
        of blessings, at the beginning of the new year for many Hindus;
Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is celebrated as Bandhi Chhor Diwas (The Celebration 
        of Freedom), in honor of the release from prison of the sixth guru, Guru 
        Hargobind; and
Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha, or 
        liberation, by Mahavira, the last of the Tirthankaras (the great 
        teachers of Jain dharma), at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the religious and historical significance of 
        the festival of Diwali; and
            (2) in observance of Diwali, the festival of lights, 
        expresses its deepest respect for Indian Americans and South 
        Asian Americans, as well as fellow countrymen and diaspora 
        throughout the world on this significant occasion.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Orders & ServicesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






National Plant Germplasm Systemheadline bar Business


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# Official Journal C 48/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.048.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 48 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5619 February 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.048.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 48

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5619 February 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2013/C 048/01 | Decision | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2013/C 048/01

Decision

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

| 19.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/1

---

DECISION

2013/C 48/01

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68, as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 and most recently by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1080/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of those Communities, and in particular Article 30 of those Staff Regulations,

Having regard to the Bureau decision of 3 May 2004 concerning the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE), as amended most recently by the Bureau on 4 May 2009,

Having regard to the expiry date, 31 December 2012, of the following European Parliament reserve lists:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/08, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S and PE/119/S,

Having regard to the opinion of the Joint Committee delivered at its meeting of 21 November 2012,

HAS DECIDED:

Article 1

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, AST/5/08, PE/96/S, PE/110/S and PE/119/S

shall be extended until 31 December 2013.

Article 2

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, C/348, AST/1/05, AST/1/06 and PE/69/S

shall not be extended.

Done at Luxembourg, 20 December 2012.

Klaus WELLE

Secretary-General

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 31215 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOHN E. MILTON, III, also known as Boo Milton , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:96

- CR

- 17

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John E. Milton, III, federal prisoner # 24395

- 034, was convicted of conspiring to possess crack and powder cocaine with intent to distribute and was sentenced to serve 600 months in prison and a five

- year term of supervised
release. Now, he moves this cou rt for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s denial of his “motion to rescind” the judgment denying his second 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 18, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-31215 Document: 00512703916 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2014No. 13

- 31215

The “motion to rescind” was meaningless, unauthorized, and without any jurisdictional basis. See United States v. Early , 2 7 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Consequently, this appeal does not involve “legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks omitted). The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous, and Milton’s IFP motion i s DENIED. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5 TH C IR

. R

. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-31215 Document: 00512703916 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         155,987
<SECURITIES>                                     1,414
<RECEIVABLES>                                  926,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                    62,815
<INVENTORY>                                     31,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,274,896
<PP&E>                                      10,023,548
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,662,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,249,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,969,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,933
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,865,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,249,602
<SALES>                                        955,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,098,478
<CGS>                                          513,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  513,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,331,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,308
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             390,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,019,044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    64,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,083,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,083,544)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)



</TABLE>
**LS
      DRAFT**


**ATTORNEY
      WORK PRODUCT**


**PRIVILEGED
      & CONFIDENTIAL**








**AMENDMENT
      TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**




**BY
      AND BETWEEN**




**MANHATTAN
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND DOUGLAS ABEL**




This
      AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is entered into as of March
      28, 2008, by and between Manhattan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") and
      Douglas Abel (the "Executive").




WITNESSETH
      THAT:




WHEREAS,
      the Company and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement,
      dated as of April 1, 2005 (the "Agreement"); and




WHEREAS,
      the Company and the Executive desire to extend the Term (as defined in the
      Agreement) of the Agreement by a period of one year.




NOW
      THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, the Company and the
      Executive hereby agree as follows:




1.  The
      Term
      is hereby extended by one year, through April 1, 2009, and, notwithstanding
      any
      other provision of the Agreement to the contrary, such one-year extension shall
      be deemed an "Additional Term" (as defined in the Agreement).




2.  This
      Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an
      original, but both of which together shall constitute one and same instrument.
      This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance
      with, the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to its principles
      of conflicts of laws.




3.  Except
      as
      specifically amended hereby, the Agreement remains otherwise unmodified and
      in
      full force an effect, and is hereby ratified by the Company and the
      Executive.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment to Employment Agreement
      as of the day and year set forth above.




MANHATTAN
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.





By:
      Michael McGuinness


Chief
      Financial Officer


/s/
                  Michael McGuinness





DOUGLAS
      ABEL


/s/
                  Douglas Abel
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Amendment  No.  1  to the Quarterly Report of
SpaceDev,  Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"), I, Richard B. Slansky, President and Chief Financial Officer of
the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec.906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

          (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  December 22,  2005

                                                  By:  /s/  Richard  B.  Slansky
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                            Richard  B.  Slansky
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to  SpaceDev, Inc. and will be
retained  by  SpaceDev,  Inc.  and  furnished  to  the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM P. WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 98-2590 THE MEN'S WAREHOUSE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1291-H) Submitted: February 2, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL William P. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Sidney Gordon L eech, Jennifer Lilore Huesman, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & GRAY, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: William P. Ward appeals the district court's order that dismissed his employment discrimination action with prejudice, purportedly under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). It appears from the context of the court's order, however, that it likely intended to dismiss Ward'saction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See Ward v. Men's Warehouse, Inc. , No. CA-98-1291-H (D. Md. Sept. 22, 1998). Because of the severity of a dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(b), district courts must balance four factors in determining whether such dismissals are appropriate: (1) the degree of personal responsibility of the plaintiff, (2)the amount of prejudice caused the defendant, (3) the existence of a drawn out history of deliberately proceeding in adilatory fashion, and (4) the existence of sanctions less drastic than dismissal. Doyle v. Murray , 938 F.2d 33, 34 (4th Cir. 1991) (internal quotation marks omitted). Although the district court stated in this case that itdismissed Ward's action for failure to respond to discovery and failure to comply with a court order, the record is silent as to whether the district court considered the above factors in dismissing Ward's action with prejudice. Thus, we have no basis to evaluate whether the district court considered all relevant factors before it acted.Accordingly, we vacate the dismissal of Ward's action with prejudice. Assuming that the district court intended to exercise its authority under Rule 41(b), we remand so that it may apply the above four-partanalysis in determining whether dismissal with prejudice was appropriate. If the court intended to dismiss Ward's action based upon another rule, we direct that the court clarify its reasoning. We express no opinion as to whether dismissal with prejudice is appropriate under any analysis, as the district court is in the best position to make this determination in the first instance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED AND REMANDED
2
Exhibit 10.8



|                   |  |                                                                                         
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|B E A Systems, Inc |  | 2315 North First Street San Jose, California 95131 Phone: 408.570.8000 Fax: 408-570-8901

LOGO

March 22, 2006

Wai Wong

2315 North First St.

San Jose, CA.

RE:    FY07 Compensation Awards

Dear Wai:

Im happy to advise that the Compensation Committee has approved the following FY07 Cash and Equity Rewards in recognition of your contributions over the last
fiscal year.

Base Salary and Bonus Potential

Effective May 1, 2006, your new annual base salary is $464,000,payable in accordance with our regular payroll cycle. This represents an 8% adjustment. Your On-Target-Eamings (OTE) is now $812,000payable in accordance
with our FY07 Corporate Bonus Plan. The Plan Document for the FY07 Corporate Bonus Plan will be sent under separate cover, however, a modification to the plan includes an annual payout (from the previous semi-annual payout schedule) as well as an
MBO provision for Succession Planning. Please reference the Plan Document for specifics.

Equity

The Compensation Committee also approved the granting of165,000 non-qualified stock options(standard 4 year vest) as well as 55,000 Restricted
Stock Units(RSUs) with a 4 year vest. The options will be priced on the next Unanimous Written Consent at Fair Market Value and you will receive the option and RSU agreements under separate cover.

Wai, I deeply appreciate your contributions and look forward to FY07 with optimism and excitement. Thanks for all of your hard work!

Sincerely,

Alfred