alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,951
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,587
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     23,815
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          15,205
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            15,409
<LOANS>                                         93,824
<ALLOWANCE>                                        878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,077
<DEPOSITS>                                     133,680
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,108
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,157
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 151,077
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,077
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  539
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   124
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,740
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,414
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,326
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    532
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         532
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       393
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.99
<LOANS-NON>                                         85
<LOANS-PAST>                                       543
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   877
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      119
<RECOVERIES>                                        45
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  878
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               878
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            469
        





</TABLE>
Case: 1:00-cv-07924 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/00 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1
Case: 1:00-cv-07924 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/00 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:2
Case: 1:00-cv-07924 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/00 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:3
Case: 1:00-cv-07924 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/00 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:4
Case: 1:00-cv-07924 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/00 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:5
Case: 1:00-cv-07924 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/00 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:6
Case: 1:00-cv-07924 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/00 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:7
Case: 1:00-cv-07924 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/00 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:8
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 1 of 34 PageID #:403
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 2 of 34 PageID #:404
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 3 of 34 PageID #:405
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 4 of 34 PageID #:406
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 5 of 34 PageID #:407
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 6 of 34 PageID #:408
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 7 of 34 PageID #:409
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 8 of 34 PageID #:410
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 9 of 34 PageID #:411
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 10 of 34 PageID #:412
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 11 of 34 PageID #:413
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 12 of 34 PageID #:414
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 13 of 34 PageID #:415
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 14 of 34 PageID #:416
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 15 of 34 PageID #:417
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 16 of 34 PageID #:418
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 17 of 34 PageID #:419
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 18 of 34 PageID #:420
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 19 of 34 PageID #:421
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 20 of 34 PageID #:422
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 21 of 34 PageID #:423
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 22 of 34 PageID #:424
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 23 of 34 PageID #:425
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 24 of 34 PageID #:426
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 25 of 34 PageID #:427
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 26 of 34 PageID #:428
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 27 of 34 PageID #:429
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 28 of 34 PageID #:430
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 29 of 34 PageID #:431
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 30 of 34 PageID #:432
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 31 of 34 PageID #:433
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 32 of 34 PageID #:434
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 33 of 34 PageID #:435
Case: 1:03-cr-00928 Document #: 79 Filed: 09/15/04 Page 34 of 34 PageID #:436
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 10-00363 Doc 44 Filed 11/30/10 Entered 11/30/10 08:39:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 281 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# C_2019357EN.01003901.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/39

---

Action brought on 19 August 2019 — DV and Others v Commission

(Case T-576/19)

(2019/C 357/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: DV and 10 other applicants (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the decisions determining the number of paid annual leave days for the applicants for 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions determining the number of paid annual leave days for the applicants for 2019;

| — | in any event, order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on a single plea in law, raising an objection of illegality directed against Article 6 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union for the same reasons as stated by the Court in the judgment of 4 December 2018, Carreras Sequeros and Others v Commission, (T-518/16, EU:T:2018:873). According to the applicant, the defendant institution refused to apply that judgment while its effects are not suspended, which amounts to an unlawful failure to comply with a judgment of the General Court.

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Bryan M. Lemley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                                 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Bryan M. Lemley                             
|                      |  | Bryan M. Lemley,                                
|                      |  | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-1 (No. 333-192451 and No. 333-201233) and Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-163150) of our report dated March 27, 2017 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Broadway Financial Corporation and Subsidiary, which report appears in the Form 10-K of Broadway Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 
| /s/ Moss Adams LLP        |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
| San Francisco, California |
| June 23,   2017      |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                          1,363,677
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   3,828,503
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     1,291,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                6,483,863
<PP&E>                          348,802
<DEPRECIATION>                  48,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,461,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           120,478
<BONDS>                         9,943,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1,000
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,461,466
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                714,523
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                631,764
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              322,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (239,427)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (239,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (239,427)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (239.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (239.43)







</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 138/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 138 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5926 May 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 138

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5926 May 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2016/796 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Railways and repealing Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European Union (
  1
  ) | 44 |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (
  1
  ) | 102 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2016/796 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Railways and repealing Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 (
  1
  )

1

1

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European Union (
  1
  )

1

44

*

Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (
  1
  )

1

102

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### In the Matter of Kerry Flaherty, Appellant, v David Harris et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), dated September 16, 1981, affirmed, without costs or disbursements *{see, Matter of Amato v Ward,*41 NY2d 469; *cf Wolff v McDonnell,*418 US 539). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.02 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-49494) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the 1995
Equity Incentive Plan, the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56654) pertaining to the
Stock Option Agreements, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-77052, 333-104100, and 333-188048) pertaining to the
2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-89220) pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Transmeta
Corporation of our report dated April 29,
2005, with respect to Transmeta Corporation managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Transmeta Corporation, included in this Form 10-K/A. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
April 29, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001031002
<NAME>                        Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding II LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  FEB-6-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                   363,882,317
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,322,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               368,204,938
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,204,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,322,621
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                    309,278,400
<COMMON>                                        54,603,917
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,204,938
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,347,538
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,347,538
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,347,538
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,347,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 19

- 00113

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 348th District Court Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 348

- 303532

- 18

Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### T HE 

### P REMIER 

### C OMPANIES



### , I NC



### ., P REMIER 

### R ENTAL



### - P URCHASE



### , I NC



### ., TRM V ENTURE 

### G ROUP



### , AND 

### RAJ, I NC



### . , Appell ants

V



### .

F OUR 

### A ’ S 

### M ESQUITE



### , LLC. , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered the parties ’ “Agreed Motion to Dism i ss Appeal.” We

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Consequently, a ppell ee ’ s “ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, ” file d on

June 10 , 2019, is denied as moot

.

A ppellant s must pay all costs of this app e al. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : October 3, 2019
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mikequann Plummer, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 134]—

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Analisa Torres, J.), rendered August 30, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and three counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Defendant was properly convicted of robbery in the first degree under a theory of use of a dangerous instrument (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]). Defendant struck the victim on the back of his head with an imitation pistol, causing a painful, bloody laceration. The evidence warranted an inference that this weapon, as used, was capable of inflicting serious physical injury, such as a brain injury *(see*Penal Law § 10.00 [13]; *People v Carter,*53 NY2d 113 [1981]).

Defendant’s argument that the court should have granted an adverse inference charge rests on the assumption that the police lost evidence that had been in their control. However, although a jacket matching part of the victim’s description of his assailant was taken from defendant after his arrest, there was conflicting information presented to the trial court regarding whether the police gave this jacket to defendant’s mother. In any event, even assuming that defendant was entitled to an adverse inference charge, the absence of such a charge was harmless. Concur — Saxe, J.P, Sweeny, Acosta, Freedman and Román, JJ.