alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021005EN.01000901.xml

| 7.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10065 — Advent/Nielsen Global Connect)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 5/09)

On 21 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10065. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10065. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Rose Parella et al., Plaintiffs, v Maurice Levin et al., Appellants, and Village of Hempstead et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants Levin appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), dated March 23, 1984, as granted defendant County of Nassau’s motion and defendant Village of Hempstead’s cross motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing the cross claim against them.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

Admittedly, neither the county nor village received prior written notice of the alleged defective condition. Absent such notice, a municipality is liable only for affirmative negligence *(see,*Nassau County Administrative Code § 12-4.0 [e]; L 1939, ch 272, as amended by L 1946, ch 992; Village Law § 6-628; CPLR 9804; *Drzewiecki v City of Buffalo,*51 AD2d 870; *D’lmperio v Village of Sidney,*14 AD2d 647, *affd*12 NY2d 927). There is no evidence that either the village or county caused the deterioration of the curb along the apron of the Levin driveway or negligently repaired such curb. The conduct for which the defendants Levin seek to impose liability upon the village and county is for nonfeasance, i.e., the failure to repair a deteriorated condition, and not for a condition either of said municipalities *751caused or created. Mollen, P. J., Niehoff, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Medina, Appellant.

— Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), both rendered February 8, 1983, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and grand larceny in the third degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. The appeals bring up for review the denial (Lonschein, J.), after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress statements.

Judgments affirmed.

A *Huntley hearing was held to*determine the voluntariness of two custodial statements made by the defendant. At the hearing, two different versions of the facts were presented. Based upon the credibility of the witnesses, the content of their testimony, and other evidence in the record, the hearing court concluded that the People’s version of the facts was the correct one. It held that the defendant was given proper *Miranda*warnings before making each statement, and that his statements were voluntarily given and therefore admissible at trial.

The record on appeal supports the hearing court’s findings of fact; therefore, its decision should be upheld *(see, People v Boyce,*89 AD2d 623). There is no inherent incredibility in the testimony of the People’s witnesses; therefore, reversal of the hearing court’s decision is not warranted *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-336-CR

CIPRIANO RAMON ALMANZA III APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 372 DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ND

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). 

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 15, 2009
#### In the Matter of Michael R. Petrone, Petitioner, v Victoria M. Argento, Monroe County Court Judge, Respondent.

[945 NYS2d 587]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to annul the determination of respondent revoking the pistol permit of petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
7KH +RQRUDEOH 1DQF\ * (GPXQGV 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LVWULFW -XGJH IRU

WKH (DVWHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 0LFKLJDQ VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ



5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU

)LOH 1DPH DS

	

		

	







5$1./<1 $11(50$1

	






(25*(  	1<'(5


	



  !

"##$%&'(
)'	''*+)*'),'-'

%'(*'+)*'),'%.'-,/0'1

 234)%%%&+)*'),'4-5

"5-67,(882

+,))$6"#)$!82

%67"
()%),-)'4-59	),-)'

4-59+7
+	+)*'),'4-5









	(0$4	'-&(*:*0$;)%"##$$'  4( :'),/ ' "		
	" 

+	"	"<1=)5'.'-,/0%"##$$

8  
(0$4	'-&(%"##$$'4(:'),/	"	"<1=)5'







	),-)'4-5:')'


)' 	''* +)*'),' -' ) )&#)*&' % ;)$')5 %##$'(-'(),-)'%%)&%)$)'(*',)5,-'&')';,'*'*),,'()**)*-')&$0:')')##'(',-'5',')%),'%#%))5 '(' '( &') >* ')*',)5 ,-' 5) ) (*-?*D-'$0 %)$  #')') % #-*-''8B
	C88A)'(*' +)*'),' % .'-,/0 '),,'  ( )*'),' ,-'5'*#'E*&')')'()*'),',-'E*,)*)"

(*'%;)>%

,#-*)*

F'() G

:')') %)$#')') %(

C88A>)'('()*'),',-''( 
'')$ ;'  #'?0'(
$"**
	 ! F
:G >* ;)$#;)%-&'&/()*5
 !  2

$UWLFOH  RI WKH ,&&35 SURYLGHV 3,I VXEVHTXHQW WR WKH

FRPPLVVLRQ RI WKH RIIHQVH SURYLVLRQ LV PDGH E\ ODZ IRU WKH LPSRVLWLRQRI D OLJKWHU SHQDOW\ WKH RIIHQGHU VKDOO EHQHILW WKHUHE\ ́  8176 

6HFWLRQ  SURYLGHV LQ SDUW 37KH ZULW RI KDEHDV FRUSXV VKDOO QRW

H[WHQG WR D SULVRQHU XQOHVV     +H LV LQ FXVWRG\ LQ YLRODWLRQ RI WKH&RQVWLWXWLRQ RU ODZV RU WUHDWLHV RI WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV ́  86&

 F

2
	AF8G(	-#&-')

	

($'('HIJ'('('(%,'%#),;),')0 %,''(' ),**'( #$'0 %  ,)& ?0'(#*,)?*''-'0&=)&-&&-*'?*-?&)'''K-0 #; ?0  *?$ -?'L   ' A 

:')')E* 	

 5-&' )* '(' '( )*'),' ,-'E*%)$-')*'-,''(K-0'(D-')'0)')'0%'(-5*);$;*-$')K-0%))5'('(>*5-)$'0%,)&>(,($&'%'(,)&('? %-?0*?$-?''(%()**',>*&'('(&=)&-&*',(,-$(;,);

?*,#-*)*;)$?$',($$5'($5$)'0%

%$#)*E*'')#-*-''C88A$0)%'(#')'),*(>'('H'(&0?0&')I#-*-''8B 
	 C 88J )* )D-'  )%%,'); ' '*' '($5$)'0%()*'')L8B
	C889B2 ' !  ()* #(*)* /> *'( *;)5* ,$-*B2'!

:')')E*,($$5>*''($5$)'0%()*'')

$$5'('()*&0?0>0%C88>*)D-')%%,');''*''($5$)'0%()*'')?,-*'(
:(?;)$'?,-*$0C88A#;)* &0 %''0;)$')*()*'),',-' K,',(%#')')E*(?*5-&'*(,-'%-'(''( 
: ) ' ')'$ #')') ' ?)5  ,')#-*-' ' C 88A  
 )') '( ,-' ) $$ %#')')E*	

,$)&*?*'(')$$5$-'()')**'%'()A288

A  1!B8! F'()	#'8A8C88A#')'),-$'??*%	



(*;)5*,$-*&0$0?

&/*,$)&%,'-$),,

! BAF'()82G9,($$5'*',?*	


%  ,'-$ ),, ,$)& -

8A 2AB

)$$0 #')') &0 ' 

,),-&;''(D-)&''(',(%$'')??-5('-?*'  ,$)&% ,'-$),#;))#'?*)*%,C 88 ?,-* )'* #;)*)* '(% ' K-),)$$0 %,	''*# $8!

8G9 "  # %%$ %  $& 2B5,B	''*,$')'('"'),$*'(*$%=,-')5G9 -')* " $
'#&
:

$ 1 (92 AAAF8GF

*$%=,-') ,$')*G (-$)/C88=#**$0),$-*;
)'	''*L*?*)*%,($$'(''(5-*%$)%-C'(*-5$%$(?'H'(*')'-')$>*' (  "  A! %$$>*'(''(%,'H'')C88A,'?,*'-*)&=,-')5#;)*)*%'')**
 !  

:H QRWH WKDW WKH )RXUWK DQG 1LQWK &LUFXLWV DOEHLW LQ XQSXEOLVKHG

RSLQLRQV KDYH IODWO\ UHMHFWHG VXFK DQ DUJXPHQW 'XWWRQ Y :DUGHQ 1R  86 $SS /H[LV  WK &LU )HE   .HQDQ Y:DUGHQ 1R   86 $SS /H[LV  WK &LU $XJ  %HQLWH] Y :DUGHQ 1R   86 $SS /H[LV WK &LU 'HF  %,?$-C88A>('(0'%,?$-C88




:')')(*'*'%'(0;$)5-&'*'*-##'

()*(?*#')')'(%'()*'),',-'K-5&')*"7+
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHOICETEL
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             407
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      698
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,192
<PP&E>                                           8,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,578
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,457
<SALES>                                          6,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,880
<CGS>                                            3,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    165
<INCOME-TAX>                                        66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 99
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        99
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

BEA SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of BEA Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark P. Dentinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

Date: December 7, 2007



By:

/s/ Mark P. DentingerMark P. DentingerChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Alzheimer's Disease Drug Development.
    Date: August 27, 2021.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Alexander Parsadanian, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building 2C/212, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a2a3b28293b3e3b34333b343b1a34333b74343332743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9eeeffecedfffafff0f7fff0ffdef0f7ffb0f0f7f6b0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Nextgen Discovery for Alzheimer's Disease.
    Date: August 30, 2021.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Alexander Parsadanian, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building 2C/212, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35455447465451545b5c545b54755b5c541b5b5c5d1b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="32425340415356535c5b535c53725c5b531c5c5b5a1c555d44">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 23, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-16072 Filed 7-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ELRIDGE ALEXANDER
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1735

[ February 2, 2022 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Robert Panse , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502019MM011877

.

Benjamin W. Buck, Jr. of Benjamin W. Buck Law, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valu n tas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appell ee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so

as to conclude that the trial court ’ s judgment is not supported by the evidence[.]”).

M AY
, G ERBER and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### In the Matter of Yanni D. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent. Hope J., Appellant. (Froceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Rudolph A.H. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Hope J., Appellant. (Froceeding No. 2.)

[944 NYS2d 923]-

In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Queens County (Tally, J.), dated August 17, 2011, which, after a hearing, found that she had neglected the child Rudolph A.H. and derivatively neglected the child Yanni D.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After a fact-finding hearing under Family Court Act article 10, any determination that a child is abused or neglected must be based on a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b]; *Matter of Nicole V.,*71 NY2d 112, 117 [1987]; *Matter of Dareth O.,*304 AD2d 667, 668 [2003]). Neglect may be established by even a single incident of excessive corporal punishment (see *Matter of Padmine M. [Sandra M.],*84 AD3d 806, 807 [2011]; *Matter of Rachel H.,*60 AD3d 1060 [2009]). The Family Court’s assessment of the credibility of witnesses is entitled to considerable deference (see *Matter of Irene O.,*38 NY2d 776 [1975]; *Matter of Sadiq H. [Karl H.],*81 AD3d 647 [2011]).

*1314Here, contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court’s finding of neglect of the child Rudolph A.H. based on excessive corporal punishment was supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; *Matter of James S. [Kathleen*S.], 88 AD3d 1006 [2011]; *Matter of Padmine M. [Sandra M.],*84 AD3d 806 [2011]; *Matter of Sadiq H. [Karl H.],*81 AD3d 647 [2011]; *Matter of Isaiah S.,*63 AD3d 948 [2009]; *Matter of Derek J.,*56 AD3d 558 [2008]). The Family Court’s finding that the mother engaged in excessive corporal punishment when she initiated an altercation in which she slapped and scratched Rudolph A.H. is supported by the evidence presented at the fact-finding hearing, including testimony of a caseworker and a police officer, and a nurse’s report describing the child’s injuries.

The evidence also supported the derivative finding of neglect as to the child Yanni D. *(see Matter of James S. [Kathleen S.],*88 AD3d 1006 [2011]; *Matter of Isaiah S.,*63 AD3d at 949; *Matter of Jordan*W., 59 AD3d 558 [2009]; *Matter of Devontay M.,*56 AD3d 561, 562 [2008]). Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.
TRIAL COURT OFFICIAL’S

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RECORD

Fax to Cathy S. Lusk, 12th Court of Appeals, Tyler, TX. Fax # (903) 593-2193

Court of Appeals No. (If Known): 12-15-00121-CV

Trial Court Style: GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D. ROLLINS VS TEXAS COLLEGE AND 

MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A “A-1 RENT ALL”

Trial Court & County: 7TH

 Trial Court No.: 13-3353-A

Date Trial Clerk’s Record Originally Due: 06/22/2015

Date Court Reporter’s/Recorder’s Record Originally Due:

Anticipated Number of Pages of Record: 29 VOLUMES

I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal but I am unable to file the record by the original 

due date for the following reason(s): (check all that apply – attach additional pages if necessary)

To the best of my knowledge, the Appellant has made no claim of indigence and has failed to

either pay the required fee or to make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record.

My duties listed below preclude working on this record:

x Other, (Explain) : DUE TO UNFORSEEN REASONS, I HAVE BEEN OUT AND UNABLE TO COMPLETE THE RECORD.

I anticipate this record will be completed and forwarded to the 12th Court of Appeals by 08-30-2015, 

And I hereby request an additional 45 days within which to prepare the record. 

TEX.R.APP.P.37.3.

In compliance with TEX.R.APP.P.9.5(e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on counsel 

for all parties to the Trial Court’s judgment or order being appealed. I further certify by my signature 

below that the information contained in this notice is true and within my personal knowledge.

Date: 05-12-15 /S/ LINDA RHYMES

 /S/ LINDA RHYMES

Office Phone Number: 903-590-1772 LINDA RHYMES

 (Printed Name)

 APPEALS CLERK

 (Official Title)

TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.5(e) reads:

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/22/2015 9:49:01 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Certificate requirements: A certificate of service must be signed by the person who made

 the service and must state:

(1) the date and manner of service;

(2) the name and address of each person served; and

(3) if the person served is a party’s attorney, the name of the party represented by that 

attorney.

The following parties have been served with a copy of this document:

Lead Counsel for APPELLANT(S): Lead Counsel for APPELLEE(S):

Name: ERNESTO SIGMON. Name: MR. TREY YARBROUGH

Address: SIGMON LAW, PLLC Address: YARBROUGH WILCOX, PLLC

2929 ALLEN PARKWAY

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77019

100 E. FERGUSON, STE. 1015

TYLER, TEXAS 75702

Phone #: 832.871.5723 Phone #: 903.595.3111 FAX 903.595.0191

214.395.1546

Attorney For: GARRY L. ROLLINS AND 

CARLA ROLLINS

Attorney For: TEXAS COLLEGE

 Name: RYAN K. GEDDIE

MARTIN, DISIERE, 

JEFFERSON & WISDOM, LLP

TOLLWAY PLAZA ONE

16000 N. DALLAS PARKWAY, 

SUITE. 800 

 DALLAS, TEXAS 75248

 Phone #: 214.420.5500 FAX 214.420.5501

 

 Attorney For: MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A

“A1-RENT ALL”
[Cite as In re Chuparkoff, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2016-Ohio-186.]

 

IN RE CHUPARKOFF. 

[Cite as In re Chuparkoff, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-186.] 

(No. 2015-2076—Submitted January 20, 2016—Decided January 21, 2016.) 

ON CERTIFIED ENTRY OF DEFAULT OF CHILD-SUPPORT ORDER. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} On December 30, 2015, this court suspended respondent, Mark 

Andrew Chuparkoff, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(18)(A)(4). 

On January 19, 2016, the Board of Professional Conduct submitted a notice 

pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(18)(D)(1)(c), notifying this court that respondent no 

longer was in default of the child-support order previously submitted to the court. 

{¶ 2} On consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that pursuant to 

Gov.Bar R. V(18)(D)(1), respondent, Mark Andrew Chuparkoff, Attorney 

Registration No. 0071982, last known business address in Akron, Ohio, be 

reinstated to the practice of law. 

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(18)(D)(2), 

reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary 

proceedings against respondent. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

________________________