alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 25.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

            WHEREAS, the undersigned officers and directors of CD&L, Inc. (the
"Company") desire to authorize Albert W. Van Ness, Jr., and William T. Brannan
to act as their attorneys-in-fact and agents, for the purpose of executing and
filing the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, including all amendments
thereto;

            NOW, THEREFORE,

            KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Albert W. Van Ness, Jr., and William T.
Brannan and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with
full power of substitution and re-substitution, to execute the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K, including any and all amendments and supplements thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this power of
attorney in the following capacities as of the 17th day of April, 2001.

        SIGNATURE                                  TITLE
        ---------                                  -----


/s/ Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.   Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
---------------------------   and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.


/s/ William T. Brannan        President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
---------------------------
William T. Brannan


/s/ Russell J. Reardon        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal
---------------------------   Financial and Accounting Officer)
Russell J. Reardon


/s/ Michael Brooks            Courier and Distribution Group President and
---------------------------   Director
Michael Brooks


/s/ Thomas E. Durkin III      Director
---------------------------
Thomas E. Durkin


/s/ Jon F. Hanson             Director
---------------------------
Jon F. Hanson


/s/ Marilu Marshall           Director
---------------------------
Marilu Marshall


/s/ Matthew Morahan           Director
---------------------------
Matthew Morahan


/s/ John Simourian            Director
---------------------------
John Simourian


/s/ John S. Wehrle            Director
---------------------------
John S. Wehrle


                                       5
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

136496 (16) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

DONALD TAYLOR, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136496 

 COA: 283736 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $35.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$340.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 23, 2008 

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-7079 MERRICK RALPH FALESBORK, a/k/a Merrick, a/k/a Merc, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-116-N, CA-97-397-2) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 2, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELJeffrey S. Shapiro, VERGARA & ASSOCIATES, Hopewell, Virginia; Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant.Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from a district court order that concluded his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), was barred by the one-year limitations period of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1998). Appellant's conviction b ecame final on September 1, 1993, and he filed his habeas motion on April 21, 1997. Appellant had until April 23, 1997, to file his § 2255 motion. See Brown v. Angelone , ___ F.3d ___, 1998 WL 389030 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998) (Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208). Therefore, his motion was not time barred. For these reasons, we grant a certificate of appealability on this issue, vacate the district court's order, and remand for further proceedings.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cayetano Enrique AYALA-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50157.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 19, 2011.

George Manahan, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James M. Chavez, Esquire, Trial, James M. Chavez, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*118Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Cayetano Enrique Ayala-Cruz appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ayala-Cruz contends that the district court erred at sentencing because it misunderstood the determinative facts of *United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez,*567 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir.2009). Ayala-Cruz has not demonstrated that this alleged error affected his substantial rights. *See United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 734-35, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993).

Ayala-Cruz also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable under *Amezcua-Vasquez*because the sentence does not adequately account for the age of his prior convictions and his individual circumstances. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the sentence is substantively reasonable. *See Amezcuar-Vas-quez,*567 F.3d at 1057-58.

Ayala-Cruz further contends that his sentence violates his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights because it was based on facts found by the judge in violation of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). He raises this claim solely to preserve the argument on appeal; as he acknowledges, the claim is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 226, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Asta Funding, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mitchell Cohen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
           Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
           operations of the Company for the periods presented.


Dated: January 20, 2006


/s/ Mitchell Cohen
-----------------------
Mitchell Cohen
Chief Financial Officer


This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the 10-K/A as a
separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff per request.
(June 11, 1985)

#### Elinore West, Respondent, v Charles West, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shorter, J.), entered October 29, 1984, denying defendant’s cross motion for (1) change of venue to Nassau County of a matrimonial action commenced by plaintiff in New York County and (2) consolidation of the action with an action commenced by defendant in Nassau County, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion is granted, without costs.

Plaintiff, a resident of Nassau County, commenced this divorce action against defendant, a resident of the State of New Jersey, in the Supreme Court, New York County, by service of a summons and complaint on or about August 14, 1984. Shortly thereafter defendant commenced a separate divorce action against plaintiff in Supreme Court, Nassau County. Defendant moved for a change of venue to Nassau County and for consolidation with the Nassau County action.

CPLR 503 (a) is controlling. It provides, in pertinent part, “(ejxcept where otherwise prescribed by law, the place of trial shall be in the county in which one of the parties resided when it was commenced”. As noted, the plaintiff resides in Nassau County and the defendant in New Jersey.

*633Plaintiff’s contention that the convenience of as yet unidentified expert witnesses and of the defendant’s accountant, whose office is in New York County, will be served by the venue laid by her is unpersuasive. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Carro, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF BILL MCDERMOTT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SAP SE

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SAP SE (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 28, 2017 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                         |  | 
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date February 28, 2017 |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ Bill McDermott      |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Bill McDermott          |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# Official Journal C 9A/12 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 9A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6012 January 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 9A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6012 January 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2017/C 9 A/01 | Notice of open competitions — EUIPO/AD/01/17 — Administrators (AD 6) and EUIPO/AST/02/17 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of intellectual property | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2017/C 9 A/01

Notice of open competitions — EUIPO/AD/01/17 — Administrators (AD 6) and EUIPO/AST/02/17 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of intellectual property

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 85

Electing members of the Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint

Committee of Congress on the Library.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1997

Mr. THOMAS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Electing members of the Joint Committee on Printing and

the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 they are hereby, elected to the following joint committees

3 of Congress, to serve with the chairman of the Committee

4 on House Oversight:

5 JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING: Mr. Ney, Ms.

6 Granger, Mr. Hoyer, and Mr. Gejdenson.

7 JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY:

8 Mr. Ney, Mr. Ehlers, Ms. Kilpatrick, and Mr. Gejdenson.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 149 (Friday, August 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 43311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will still be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 14, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 
214-413-6550.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications 
Project Committee will be held Tuesday, September 14, 2021, at 12:00 
p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Conchata Holloway. For more information please contact 
Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550, or write TAP 
Office, 1114 Commerce Street, Mail Code 1005DAL, Dallas, Texas, 75242 
or contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda 
will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 2, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-16781 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### DORAN, Appellant, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by Catherine A. Doran against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
#### DANIEL KIEVIT PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. LOYAL PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

October 3, 1960.

*Messrs. Kushner & Kleiner*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. McCarter & English*for the respondent.

Granted.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center: Pendleton, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Related TopicsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pendleton, Oregon Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center People





- Curtis Adams, Plant Physiologist
- Catherine Reardon, Microbiologist
- Vacant, Agronomist
- Hero Gollany, Soil Chemist
- Vacant, Hydrologist
- Stewart Wuest, Soil Scientist

Curtis  Adams    Plant Physiologist /ARSUserFiles/56575/Picture Adams Far (1).jpg
 Educational Background: BS in Crop Science, Utah State University, 2007. MS in Plant Science, Utah State University, 2009. PhD in Crop Physiology, Utah State University, 2013. Skills and Expertise: Crop physiology, crop ecology, and agronomy Focus of the Plant Physiology Program: In my research program, I seek to be a leader in improving the long-term economic and environmental sustainability of agricultural ecosystems and improving the productivity, quality, and resilience of crop plants. Disciplinary approaches of crop physiology, crop ecology, and agronomy are used to better understand how crops respond to the environment and interact in cropping systems, guiding improved variety development and management practices. Current Research Projects: Research is funded under the USDA-ARS NP 216 Agricultural System Competitiveness and Sustainability


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### In the Matter of Reuben Ross, Petitioner, v Albert Prack, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[948 NYS2d 695]—

*1580Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Correction officials received information about a fight among inmates and, through an investigation, learned that petitioner had been involved. Petitioner was examined and found to have wounds on each shoulder. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting and failing to report an injury. Petitioner was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the misbehavior report was sufficiently particular to apprise him of the charges and enable him to prepare a defense *(see Matter of Page v Fischer,*64 AD3d 1067, 1067 [2009]; *Matter of Umoja v Bezio,*64 AD3d 1066, 1066-1067 [2009]). Turning to the merits, petitioner’s plea of guilty to the charge of failing to report an injury precludes him from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting this charge *(see Matter of Cruz v Walsh,*87 AD3d 1234, 1234 [2011]; *Matter of Anthony v Fischer,*81 AD3d 1027, 1027 [2011]). As for the charge of fighting, however, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the record does not contain substantial evidence supporting this charge as there were no witnesses who actually observed petitioner engaged in a fight *(see Matter of Gittens v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*87 AD3d 1194, 1195 [2011]; *Matter of Sierra v Fischer,*82 AD3d 1436, 1437 [2011]). Thus, the determination must be annulled with respect to this charge, but the matter need not be remitted for a reassessment of the penalty given that no loss of good time was imposed and petitioner has already served the penalty *(see Matter of Flournoy v Bezio,*84 AD3d 1636, 1637 [2011]; *Matter of Benvenutti v Fischer,*67 AD3d 1105, 1105 [2009]).

Mercure, J.E, Lahtinen, Kavanagh, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of fighting; petition granted to that extent and the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner’s institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.
# L_2009020EN.01S00301.xml

| 23.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 20/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 20/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000816 01-MAY-2014 08:11 AM