alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Cereal Disease Lab: St. Paul, MN
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Cereal Rust Bulletins
                    PublicationsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area St. Paul, Minnesota Cereal Disease Lab People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Yue Jin
- Shahryar Kianian
- H. Corby Kistler
- James Kolmer
- Matt Rouse
- Les Szabo
- Karen Broz (Hilburn)
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- Publications
- ARS News Articles

Yue  Jin
                     

                     Research Plant Pathologist


                     Phone: (612) 625-5291
                     
                     

                     Fax: (651) 649-5054
                     

                     1551 LINDIG STREET                                
                     UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA                           
                     

                     SAINT PAUL                    , MN 55108


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

HEIDI HAPPEL and KENT HAPPEL, =)
her husband, )
)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. ) No. 02 C 7771

)

WAL-MART STORES, INC., a )
Delaware corporation, d/b/a WALMART )
PHARMACY, )
)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The Happels, husband and wife, settled with the doctor writing the prescription for
$75,000 each, or $150,000. They later obtained a verdict against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Wal-
Mart), in the amount of $465,400. Wal-Mart now seeks to amend the judgment so as to reflect
a setoff of $150,000. That motion is granted.

Plaintiffs object to the setoff because the verdict does not indicate what part of the
judgment is allocated to Heidi Happel and what part to Kent Happel. They contend that they
wanted an itemization, Wal-Mart objected, and the result was a general verdict that does not
allocate. Therefore, they contend, it is impossible to determine whether, for example, the
recovery by the husband was as much as $75,000.

But clearly the $150,000 and the $465,400 pertain to the same facts and same injuries.
Plaintiff did seek itemization by nature of the damage — but only after the jury had determined
a single amount as “their” compensatory damages. The plaintiffs presented a united front to

the jury; they have been scriously injured as a couple, The court docs not recall counsel


No. 02 C 7771 Page 2

making damages distinctions between husband and wife in the instructions or in closing
argument, They were a married couple who were injured, and no effort was made to
distinguish between them. That approach was, as we recall, followed without objection of

plaintiff or defendant, and we follow it here in allowing the setoff.

\emea B. Whee”

JAMES B. MORAN
Senior Judge, U, S. District Court
Hereby %3_, 2007.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 21, 2003 (the "Form
10-Q") of LDM Technologies, Inc. (the "Issuer").

         I, Alan C. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify
that:

         (i)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to LDM Technologies, Inc. and will be
retained by LDM Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: January 27, 2004



                                             By:  /s/ A.C. Johnson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                      Alan C. Johnson
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      LDM Technologies, Inc.





                                       24
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-51165

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS LAGUNAS-SANCHEZ, also known as

Raefel Rodriguez-Orosco, also known as

Rafael Orosco,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-03-CR-210-ALL-OG

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Carlos Lagunas-Sanchez appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Lagunas-Sanchez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have
No. 03-51165

-2-

been alleged in his indictment. Lagunas-Sanchez maintains that

he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence

exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be

imposed for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Lagunas-Sanchez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 264 

Designating September 12, 2011, as ‘‘National Day of Encouragement’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 12, 2011, as ‘‘National Day of 

Encouragement’’. 

Whereas negative images, stories, and influences in the dayto-day lives of the people of the United States can detrimentally affect their emotional well-being, interactions 

with others, and general demeanor; 

Whereas a group of teenagers participating in a leadership 

forum at Harding University in Searcy, Arkansas, identified a lack of encouragement as one of the greatest problems facing young people today; 

Whereas the youth of the United States need guidance, inspiration, and reassurance to counteract this negativity and 

to develop the qualities of character essential for future 

leadership in the United States; 


ebenthall on DSK29S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 264 ATS 

Whereas a National Day of Encouragement would serve as 

a reminder to counterbalance and overcome negative influences, and would also provide much-needed encouragement and support to others; 

Whereas, following the events of September 11, 2001, thousands of people made sacrifices in order to bring help and 

healing to the victims and their families, inspiring and 

encouraging the people of the United States; and 

Whereas the renewed feelings of unity, hope, selflessness, and 

encouragement that began on September 12, 2001, are 

the same feelings that the National Day of Encouragement is meant to recapture and spread: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 12, 2011, as ‘‘Na3 tional Day of Encouragement’’; 

4 (2) acknowledges the importance of encourage5 ment and positive influences in the lives of all peo6 ple; and 

7 (3) urges the people of the United States to en8 courage others, whether through an act of service, a 

9 thoughtful letter, or words of kindness and inspira10 tion, and by that encouragement to boost the morale 

11 of all people of the United States. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK29S0YB1PROD with BILLS
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Databases
                        Alfalfa Transcription Factor Database
                                    iPhyClassifier - Phytoplasma Sequence ClassificationSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Publications
- Contact Information
- Research Projects
- The sugarbeet root maggot
- Reporter gene (uidA) in leaves
- Functional analysis of sugar beet resistance genes
- In vitro bioassay
- Cytokinin gene (ipt) mediated insect resistance
- Cytokinin-responsive genes
- Plant cytochrome P450 monooxygenases

Anna C Smigocki
                     

                     Research Geneticist (Plants)


                     Phone: (301) 504-7118
                     
                     

                     Fax: (301) 504-5449
                     Room 122

                     10300 BALTIMORE AVENUE                            
                     
                     BLDG 004 BARC-WEST            

                     BELTSVILLE                    , MD 20705-235


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Boyd, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The hearing court properly denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that they had been denied their statutory right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.30, 210.20). The court properly excluded from the statutory six-month time period (CPL 30.30 [1] [a]) the 32 days that the case was initially adjourned in Lackawanna City Court to allow defendants to secure the services of an attorney (CPL 30.30 [4] [f]) and thereafter further adjourned at the request of, or with the consent of, the defendants or their counsel for the purpose of scheduling a preliminary hearing *(People v Worley,*66 NY2d 523; *People v Pressley,*115 AD2d 228; *People v Campbell,*96 AD2d 725; *see, People v Sturgis,*38 NY2d 625). In addition, the record fully supports the court’s exclusion of that period of time between defendants’ postindictment request for a 45-day adjournment to make pretrial motions and the People’s announcement on the record of their readiness for trial (CPL 30.30 [4] [a], [b]). When these two time periods are excluded, the People were ready for trial within the statutory six-month period. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mark, J. — robbery, second degree, two counts.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1006

To authorize appropriations for the expansion of the columbarium of the

National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 10, 1997

Mr. AKAKA (for himself and Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the expansion of the columbarium of the National Memorial Cemetery of the

Pacific.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

4 THE EXPANSION OF THE COLUMBARIUM OF

5 THE NATIONAL MEMORIAL CEMETERY OF

6 THE PACIFIC.

7 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec8 retary of Veterans Affairs, for the purpose of expanding
2

S 1006 IS

1 the columbarium of the National Cemetery of the Pacific,

2 $1,500,000, to remain available until expended.

Æ
# C_2019312EN.01004901.xml

| 16.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/49

---

Action brought on 7 August 2019 — Isigny-Sainte Mère v EUIPO (Shape of a golden container with a type of wave)

(Case T-546/19)

(2019/C 312/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Isigny-Sainte Mère (Isigny-sur-Mer, France) (represented by: D. Mallo Saint-Jalmes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark (Shape of a golden container with a type of wave) — Application for registration No 17 871 521

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2019 in Case R 1513/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul the contested decision.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00479

- CR

VICTOR PRIETO AZAMAR

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 1380

- 13

- J(1)

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 26, 2017
# Official Journal L 71I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 071I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 642 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 071I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 642 March 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/371 of 2 March 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/372 of 2 March 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/371 of 2 March 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/372 of 2 March 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 143 (Thursday, July 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: July 29, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
July 23, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 714 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-116, CP2021-
118.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-16105 Filed 7-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2019363EN.01000901.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 6 August 2019 — Confederación Nacional de Centros Especiales de Empleo (CONACEE) v Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa

(Case C-598/19)

(2019/C 363/15)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Confederación Nacional de Centros Especiales de Empleo (CONACEE)

Defendant: Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa

Question referred

Must Article 20 of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) on public procurement be interpreted as meaning that the scope ratione personae of the reservation laid down therein cannot be defined in terms which exclude from its scope undertakings or economic operators which satisfy the condition that at least 30 % of their employees must be persons with disabilities and which meet the aim or objective of the social and professional integration of those persons, by setting additional criteria related to the constitution, character and aims of those bodies, to their activities and investments, or to other matters

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement (OJ 2014 L 94, p.65)

---
**Exhibit 23.02**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-49494) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1997Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56654) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement(Form S-8 Nos. 333-77052, 333-104100, and 333-188048) pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Planand the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-89220)pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Transmeta Corporation of our report datedMarch 25, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Transmeta Corporationincluded in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPSan Jose, CaliforniaMarch 28, 2007