alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Bryan M. Lemley, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s 

auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 13, 2003 

 

/s/ Bryan M. Lemley

Bryan M. Lemley, Secretary,

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|EXHIBIT 23.1
|------------



|INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT
|------------------------------------------------------



|Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc.
|---------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-53045 ) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-15039, 333-52519, 333-37670, 333-96993, 333-111367 and 333-126064) of our report dated March 26, 2009 with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then ended appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in each such Prospectus.



| | /s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLPMarcum & Kliegman LLP
| | ----------------------------------------------



|New York, New YorkMarch 26, 2009
|--------------------------------

---
# C_2021252EN.01003803.xml

| 28.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/38

---

Order of the General Court of 20 April 2021 — Compass Overseas Holdings and Others v Commission

(Case T-702/19) (1)

(2021/C 252/61)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.

---
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 416 

Supporting the designation of April as Parkinson’s Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. 

ISAKSON, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Ms. LANDRIEU, and Mrs. HUTCHISON) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of April as Parkinson’s 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas Parkinson’s disease is the second most common 

neurodegenerative disease in the United States, second 

only to Alzheimer’s disease; 

Whereas there is inadequate comprehensive data on the incidence and prevalence of Parkinson’s disease, as of 2011, 

it is estimated that the disease affects from 500,000 to 

1,500,000 people in the United States; 

Whereas although research suggests the cause of Parkinson’s 

disease is a combination of genetic and environmental 

factors, the exact cause and progression of the disease is 

still unknown; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 416 ATS 

Whereas there is no objective test for Parkinson’s disease, 

and the rate of misdiagnosis can be high; 

Whereas symptoms of Parkinson’s disease vary from person 

to person and include tremors, slowness, difficulty with 

balance, swallowing, chewing, speaking, rigidity, cognitive 

problems, dementia, mood disorders, such as depression 

and anxiety, constipation, skin problems, and sleep disruptions; 

Whereas medications mask some symptoms of Parkinson’s 

disease for a limited amount of time each day, often with 

dose-limiting side effects; 

Whereas ultimately the medications and treatments lose their 

effectiveness, generally after 4 to 8 years, leaving the person unable to move, speak, or swallow; 

Whereas there is no cure, therapy, or drug to slow or halt 

the progression of Parkinson’s disease; and 

Whereas increased education and research are needed to help 

find more effective treatments with fewer side effects 

and, ultimately, an effective treatment or cure for Parkinson’s disease: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of April as Parkin3 son’s Awareness Month; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Parkinson’s 

5 Awareness Month; 

6 (3) continues to support research to find better 

7 treatments, and eventually, a cure for Parkinson’s 

8 disease; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 416 ATS 

1 (4) recognizes the people living with Parkin2 son’s who participate in vital clinical trials to ad3 vance knowledge of the disease; and 

4 (5) commends the dedication of local and re5 gional organizations, volunteers, and millions of 

6 Americans across the country working to improve 

7 the quality of life of persons living with Parkinson’s 

8 disease and their families. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2004262EN.01000601.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 9 September 2004

in Case C-383/02: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Environment - Waste management - Rodano waste disposal site - Directive 75/442/EEC as amended by Directive 91/156/EEC - Articles 4 and 8)

(2004/C 262/11)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-383/02: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Konstantinidis and R. Amorosi) v Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia, assisted by M. Fiorilli) — action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC brought on 18 October 2002 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann, President of Chamber, S. von Bahr and R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 September 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | By failing to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that the waste deposited at the Rodano waste disposal site (Milan) (Italy) is recovered or eliminated without endangering human health and without using processes or methods which could harm the environment, and by failing to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that any holder of waste at that site has it handled by a private or public waste collector or by an undertaking which carries out the operations listed in Annex II A or B to Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156 of 18 March 1991, or recovers or disposes of it himself, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 8 of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

By failing to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that the waste deposited at the Rodano waste disposal site (Milan) (Italy) is recovered or eliminated without endangering human health and without using processes or methods which could harm the environment, and by failing to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that any holder of waste at that site has it handled by a private or public waste collector or by an undertaking which carries out the operations listed in Annex II A or B to Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156 of 18 March 1991, or recovers or disposes of it himself, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 8 of that directive.

| 2. | The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305 of 7.12.2002.

1

---
wor-ex417_12.htm



Exhibit 4.17

July 30, 2021

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C.  20549


	
 
	
Re:
	
Worthington Industries, Inc. – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 




- SEC File No. 1-8399

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Worthington Industries, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is today filing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 (the “Form 10-K”).

None of (i) Worthington Industries, Inc., (ii) any of the consolidated subsidiaries of Worthington Industries, Inc. or (iii) Worthington Armstrong Venture, a 50%-owned unconsolidated joint venture (in the form of a general partnership between Armstrong Ventures, Inc., a subsidiary of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., and The Worthington Steel Company (Delaware), a subsidiary of Worthington Industries, Inc.), for which financial statements are required to be filed with the Form 10-K, has outstanding any instrument or agreement with respect to its long-term debt, other than those filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K, under which the total amount of long-term debt authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of Worthington Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  In accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, Worthington Industries, Inc. hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of each instrument or agreement defining (i) the rights of holders of the long-term debt of Worthington Industries, Inc. or (ii) the rights of holders of the long-term debt of a consolidated subsidiary of Worthington Industries, Inc. or (iii) the rights of holders of the long-term debt of Worthington Armstrong Venture, in each case which is not being filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K.

 


	
 
	
Very truly yours,

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
/s/ Joseph B. Hayek

	
 
	
Joseph B. Hayek

	
 
	
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-02T19:40:35Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-02T19:40:35Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-02T19:40:35Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="14203">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-02T19:40:35Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>._. 
‘1. 
</p>
<p>. 
</p>
<p>.- </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
#### Glenn PRENTICE, also known as Glenn M. Prentice, Appellant v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, et al., Appellees.

No. 08-5202.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 29, 2008.

Rehearing En Banc Denied Jan. 16, 2009.

Glenn Prentice, Clinton Township, MI, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and RANDOLPH and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 3, 2008, be affirmed. Because one district court has no jurisdiction to review the decision of another district court, *see Celotex*Corp. *v. Edwards,*514 U.S. 300, 313, 115 S.Ct. 1493, 131 L.Ed.2d 403 (1995), the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia properly determined it lacked jurisdiction to review action taken by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Southern Division). Moreover, because a challenge to a state court action must proceed through that state’s system of appellate review rather than through a federal district court, *see Johnson v. De Grandy,*512 U.S. 997, 1006, 114 S.Ct. 2647, 129 L.Ed.2d 775 (1994) (citing *District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 482, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); *Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 416, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923) *(Rooker-Feldman*doctrine)), the district court properly determined it lacked jurisdiction to review action taken by a Michigan state court. Consequently, the district court had no *461authority to grant any of the relief requested.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
#### Rebecca Preston et al. *v.*Anthony J. Keith et al.

Decided March 28, 1990

*William J. Melley III,*in support of the petition.

*Terence S. Hawkins,*in opposition.

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 656, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In a negligence action in which the evidence raises an issue about the plaintiff’s conduct with respect to the duty to mitigate damages: (1) what instructions should the jury receive about the relationship between mitigation of damages and proximate cause? (2) What is the appropriate allocation of the burden of proof on the issue of mitigation of damages?”
# Official Journal L 281/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 281 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6328 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 281

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6328 August 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement for the Termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties between the Member States of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement for the Termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties between the Member States of the European Union

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

| 28.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 281/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement for the Termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties between the Member States of the European Union

The Agreement for the Termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties between the Member States of the European Union, signed at Brussels on 5 May 2020
   (1), will enter into force on 29 August 2020, in accordance with Article 16(1) of the Agreement.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 169, 29.5.2020.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott Sullinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation.



Date: June 14, 2004



By:

/s/ Scott SullingerName:

Scott SullingerTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 194/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 194 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6421 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 194

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6421 May 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 194/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10173 — Luminus/Essent Belgium) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 194/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10173 — Luminus/Essent Belgium) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 194/02 | Euro exchange rates — 20 May 2021 | 2 |
| 2021/C 194/03 | Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers at its meeting of 1 December 2020 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case M.9660 – Google/Fitbit – Rapporteur: Poland (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2021/C 194/04 | Final Report of the Hearing Officer – Case M.9660 – Google/Fitbit (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2021/C 194/05 | Summary of Commission Decision of 17 December 2020 declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case M.9660 – Google/Fitbit)
  (notified under document C(2020) 9105)

   (
  1
  ) | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 194/02

Euro exchange rates — 20 May 2021

2

2021/C 194/03

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers at its meeting of 1 December 2020 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case M.9660 – Google/Fitbit – Rapporteur: Poland (
  1
  )

1

3

2021/C 194/04

Final Report of the Hearing Officer – Case M.9660 – Google/Fitbit (
  1
  )

1

6

2021/C 194/05

Summary of Commission Decision of 17 December 2020 declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case M.9660 – Google/Fitbit)
  (notified under document C(2020) 9105)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 9105)

1

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 194/06 | Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 17 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2021/C 194/06

Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### FANIMATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAN’S FAN CITY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2011-1180.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 20, 2011.

David M. Lockman, Maginot, Moore & Beck, LLP, of Indianapolis, IN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Harold C. Moore and Paul J. Maginot.

Dwight D. Lueck, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, of Indianapolis, IN, argued for the defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Michael R. Brunelle.

NEWMAN, MAYER, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.