alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-876]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Cambrex High Point, Inc., has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before October 4, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before October 4, 2021
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on July 9, 2021, Cambrex High Point, Inc., 4180 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway, High Point, North Carolina 27265-8017, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug
                             code
ScheduleOxymorphone
9652
IINoroxymorphone
9668
II
 The company plans to manufacture the above listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-16690 Filed 8-4-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
Document

Exhibit 10.7

                                    


April 12, 2021


Hi Ursula Hurley,


JetBlue is successful because of Crewleaders like you who demonstrate passion, dedication, and a commitment to balancing the interests of our Company, Customers and Shareholders.


As you likely appreciate, the impact of COVID-19 has created an incredibly challenging period for our company, our industry, and all of us as individuals. That said, we want to recognize your significant efforts and contributions despite these challenges with an Executive Retention Award to encourage your continued active employment at JetBlue.


Executive Retention Award: You will be eligible to receive a one-time cash bonus amount of $115,000 on the later of (1) May 1, 2023, OR (2) 30 days following the lapse of CARES Act compensation restrictions, or subsequent legislation establishing similar limitations (such date, the “Payment Date”).  


You must remain actively employed with JetBlue through the Payment Date in order to be eligible to receive payment of the award.  However, should you retire or experience an involuntary termination prior to the Payment Date, any entitlement to the award will be determined by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief People Officer as the Company deems appropriate in its sole and exclusive discretion based on the circumstances at the time, with payment , if any, occurring on the Payment Date.




Thank you again for your continued extraordinary efforts during this unprecedented time. We look forward to your future contributions and continued success here at JetBlue. 




Best regards,


			
	/s/ Michael Elliott
	Michael Elliott
	Chief People Officer
# Official Journal L 261/30 S

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 261 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5130 September 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 261

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5130 September 2008

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2008/752/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 27 June 2008 amending Annexes I and II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC as regards certification requirements for imports into the Community of certain live ungulate animals and their fresh meat
  (notified under document number C(2008) 3040)


   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2008/752/EC

*

Commission Decision of 27 June 2008 amending Annexes I and II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC as regards certification requirements for imports into the Community of certain live ungulate animals and their fresh meat
  (notified under document number C(2008) 3040)


   (1)

(notified under document number C(2008) 3040)

1

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

s3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Echo Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick T. Mooney, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.


Patrick T. Mooney, M.D.


Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board





November 15, 2010
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 51 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns 

3 on any day from Friday, June 29, 2012, through Monday, 

4 July 2, 2012, on a motion offered pursuant to this concur5 rent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 

6 stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, 

7 July 9, 2012, or such other time on that day as may be 

8 specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the mo9 tion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any re10 assembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolu11 tion, whichever occurs first; and that when the House ad12 journs on any legislative day from Friday, June 29, 2012, 

13 through Friday, July 6, 2012, on a motion offered pursu14 ant to this concurrent resolution by its majority leader or 

15 his designee, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Mon16 day, July 9, 2012, or until time of any reassembly pursu17 ant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever 

18 occurs first. 
2 

†SCON 51 ES 

1 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the 

2 Speaker of the House, or their respective designees, acting 

3 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

4 Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify 

5 the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to re6 assemble at such place and time as they may designate 

7 if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it. 

Passed the Senate June 29, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 51 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess 

of Representatives. of the Senate and an adjournment of the House
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Commodity Protection and Quality Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research
                                    Water Management Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Commodity Protection and Quality Research People & Locations





- Home Page
- Contact Information
- News Articles
- Publications
- Research Projects
- Commodity Fumigation and Residues
- Agrochemical Fate and Transport
- Natural Products Discovery and Utilization
- Chang-Lin Xiao - Research Leader
- Charles Burks
- Dave Obenland
- Joel Siegel
- Spencer Walse

Spencer  Walse
                     

                     Research Chemist
                     


                     ARS News Articles


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Glenn Stearns, Chapter 13 Trustee Chapter 13 Trustee

4343 Commerce Court, Suite 120

Lisle, IL 60532-3614

Ph: (630) 577-1313 Fax: (630) 577-1341

In re:

ROBERT J PUTNAM

BARBARA L PUTNAM

Case No. 10-00927

ROBERT J PUTNAM

BARBARA L PUTNAM

2464 PRAIRIE CROSSING DR.

MONTGOMERY, IL 60538

C DAVID WARD

540 N BROADWAY

AURORA, IL 60505

US BANK

% OCWEN LOAN SVCG LLC

PO BOX 24781

WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33416-4781

NOTICE OF PAYMENT OF FINAL MORTGAGE CURE AMOUNT UNDER PARAGRAPH B (2) (b) OF PLAN

Please take notice that the final payment of the cure amount specified in Paragraph 5 of Section E of the confirmed plan 

of the above referenced debtor has been paid. Pursuant to the plan, all pre-petition obligations of the debtor have been 

satisfied and the mortgage holder is required to treat the mortgage as reinstated and fully current unless the debtor has failed 

to make timely payments of post-petition obligations.

If the debtor has failed to make timely payments of any post-petition obligation, the mortgage holder is required to 

itemize all outstanding payment obligations as of the date of the notice and file a statement of these obligations with the 

court. The notice shall be filed with the court within sixty (60) days (or as such longer time as the court may order) of the 

service of the notice of cure from the Trustee and the notice shall be served to the debtor, debtor’s attorney, and the standing 

trustee. If the mortgage holder fails to file and serve a statement of outstanding obligations within the required time, the 

holder is then required to treat the mortgage as reinstated according to its original terms and fully current as of the date of the 

trustee’s notice.

If the mortgage holder does serve a statement of outstanding obligations within the required time, the debtor may (i), 

within thirty (30) days of the service of the statement, challenge the accuracy of the statement by a motion filed with the 

court as a contested matter with notice to the mortgage holder and the standing trustee or (ii), propose a modified plan to 

provide for payment of additional amounts that the debtor acknowledges or the court determines to be due. To the extent 

that the amounts set forth on a timely filed statement of outstanding obligations are not determined by the court to be invalid 

or are not paid by the debtor through a modified plan, the right of the mortgage holder to collect these amounts will be 

unaffected. 

Any costs of collection, including attorney fees, incurred by the mortgage holder after filing of this bankruptcy case and 

before the final payment of the cure amount specified in Paragraph 5 of Section E may be added to that cure amount pursuant 

to court order on motion of the holder. Otherwise, any such costs of collection shall be claimed pursuant to sub -paragraph 

(b) above.

The undersigned certifies that this notice was sent to the above named parties on May 19, 2011.

 /S/ Marifran Smith

For: Glenn Stearns, Chapter 13 Trustee, Standing Trustee

Case 10-00927 Doc 36 Filed 05/19/11 Entered 05/19/11 11:43:57 Desc Page 1

 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALAN ORTIZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 702 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Case: 1:02-cv-01764 Document #: 83 Filed: 02/25/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:575
# C_2021053EN.01006802.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/68

---

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2020 — Broadcom v Commission

(Case T-876/19) (1)

(2021/C 53/87)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.

---
# C_2019337EN.01000801.xml

| 7.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel (Luxembourg) lodged on 25 July 2019 — Parquet général du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg v JR

(Case C-566/19)

(2019/C 337/09)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Parquet général du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Defendant: JR

Questions referred

Can the French Public Prosecutor’s Office at the investigating court or trial court, which has jurisdiction in France, under the law of that State, to issue a European arrest warrant, be considered to be an issuing judicial authority, within the autonomous meaning of that term in Article 6(1) of Council Framework Decision No 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002, (1) in circumstances where, deemed to monitor compliance with the conditions necessary for the issue of a European arrest warrant and to examine whether such a warrant is proportionate in relation to the details of the criminal file, it is, at the same time, the authority responsible for the criminal prosecution in the same case?

---

(1)  Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).

---
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Mario Saraceno

Decided March 8, 1990

*Joseph A. Hourihan,*in support of the petition.

*Mitchell S. Brody,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is denied.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00569-CR

Yurisdanyer Garcia-Sanchez

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

299th District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-1-DC-16-301140

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 23, 2018
#### Sylvester Cocivi et al. *v.*Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Fairfield et al.

Decided March 28, 1990

*John F. Fallon, Jay S. Kogan*and *Barbara J. O’Brien,*in support of the petition.

*George J. Markley,*in opposition.

The defendant Donald Scinto’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 705, is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1009 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1009

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the Federal 
                             minimum wage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 1997

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the Federal 
                             minimum wage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Family Fair Minimum Wage 
Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

    Paragraph (1) of section 6(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 
1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) except as otherwise provided in this section not less 
        than--
            ``(A) $5.65 an hour during the year beginning on September 
        1, 1998;
            ``(B) $6.15 an hour during the year beginning on September 
        1, 1999;
            ``(C) $6.65 an hour during the year beginning on September 
        1, 2000;
            ``(D) $6.95 an hour during the year beginning on September 
        1, 2001; and
            ``(E) $7.25 an hour during the year beginning on September 
        1, 2002.''
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 102A/18 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 102A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6218 March 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 102A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6218 March 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Data Protection Supervisor |
| 2019/C 102 A/01 | Vacancy Notice No 6/2019 (Publication under Article 29, § 2 of the Staff Regulations) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Data Protection Supervisor

2019/C 102 A/01

Vacancy Notice No 6/2019 (Publication under Article 29, § 2 of the Staff Regulations)

o

(Publication under Article 29, § 2 of the Staff Regulations)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sontra Medical Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Harry G. Mitchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Harry G. Mitchell  
|Harry G. Mitchell      
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 20, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2023 ND 165

Abigail Lillian Buller, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Matthew John Buller, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20230050

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable Cynthia M. Feland, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Ashley A. Olson (argued) and Patti J. Jensen (on brief), East Grand Forks, 

Minnesota, for plaintiff and appellant.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, North Dakota, for defendant and appellee; 

submitted on brief.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Buller v. Buller

No. 20230050

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Abigail Buller appeals the judgment entered by the district court in this

divorce proceeding. She argues the court erred by awarding primary 

residential responsibility of the parties’ minor child to Matthew Buller. She 

also argues the court erred in its valuation and distribution of marital property.

An order regarding primary residential responsibility and valuation and 

distribution of the marital estate is subject to the clearly erroneous standard 

of review. See Berdahl v. Berdahl, 2022 ND 136, ¶¶ 6, 9, 977 N.W.2d 294;

Carlson v. Carlson, 2020 ND 36, ¶ 6, 940 N.W.2d 662. We conclude the findings 

regarding primary residential responsibility and valuation and distribution of 

property were not induced by an erroneous view of the law, there is evidence 

in the record to support the findings, and, after a review of the entire record, 

we are not left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made. 

We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Douglas A. Bahr
Description of Fourth Amendment to the Amended & Restated Employment Agreement




 Exhibit 10.5 
 Description of Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Kent J. Hussey, effective as of August 28, 2009 
 Effective as of August 28, 2009, the board of directors of Spectrum Brands, Inc. reinstated the annual base salary of Kent J. Hussey to $825,000, which
reinstatement amended that certain Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of February 24, 2009, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Kent J. Hussey.