alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TAG ENTERTAINMENTCORP. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-KSB forthe period ending December  31,  2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Steve Austin, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                     |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company. |

/s/ SteveAustin            Steve Austin,Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer April 12,2006

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00160
- CV

Juan A. Martin
- de
- Nicolas, Appellant

v. Mark Octaviano and Victorio Tostado, Appellee s

FROM THE 261ST DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- GN
- 18
- 007225 , THE HONORABLE STEP H E N YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRE SIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due May 28, 2019 . On appellant ’ s
motion s , the time for filing was extended to August 26, 2019. Appellant has now filed a third motion, requesting that the C o u rt extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. We grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than September 25, 2019.
No furth er extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this o rder may resu lt in dismissal of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a).

It is ordered on September 11, 2019.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
II

Calendar No. 128

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1065

To amend the Ethics in Government Act with respect to the appointment

of an independent counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 24, 1997

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

JULY 25, 1997

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To amend the Ethics in Government Act with respect to

the appointment of an independent counsel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Independent Counsel

5 Reform Act of 1997’’.
2

S 1065 PCS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE ETHICS IN GOVERNMENT

2 ACT.

3 (a) INCLUSION OF FEDERAL ELECTION LAWS.—Sec4 tion 591 of title 28, United States Code, is amended in

5 subsection (a) by adding ‘‘any provision of the Federal

6 Election Campaign Act of 1974, as amended, the Presi7 dential Election Campaign Fund Act, as amended, or the

8 Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as

9 amended, or’’ after ‘‘violated’’.

10 (b) CONGRESSIONAL APPLICATION FOR APPOINT11 MENT OF INDEPENDENT COUNSEL.—Section 595 of title

12 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end

13 the following:

14 ‘‘(d) CONGRESSIONAL APPLICATION.—Where the

15 Committee on the Judiciary of either House of the Con16 gress has received a report from the Attorney General con17 taining notification that the appointment of an independ18 ent counsel is not warranted, and the committee or a ma19 jority of the majority party members or a majority of the

20 nonmajority party members of such committee determines

21 that the Attorney General’s failure to appoint an inde22 pendent counsel is an abuse of discretion, the committee

23 or a majority of majority party members or a majority

24 of the nonmajority party members of such committee may

25 petition the court to appoint an independent counsel.’’
3

S 1065 PCS

1 (c) JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF NEED FOR INDE2 PENDENT COUNSEL.—Section 593(b) of title 28, United

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow4 ing:

5 ‘‘(5) AUTHORITY UNDER CONGRESSIONAL AP6 PLICATION.—Upon receipt of a congressional appli7 cation under section 595(d) of this title, the division

8 of the court shall appoint an appropriate independ9 ent counsel and shall define that independent coun10 sel’s prosecutorial jurisdiction upon a determination

11 by such division that the Attorney General’s failure

12 to appoint an independent counsel is an abuse of

13 discretion.’’.
Calendar No. 128

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1065

A BILL

To amend the Ethics in Government Act with resel. spect to the appointment of an independent counJULY 25, 1997

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        318,907
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      6,299,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   544,419
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      1,851,183
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        1,854,800
<LOANS>                                    13,154,937
<ALLOWANCE>                                    60,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             22,911,280
<DEPOSITS>                                 15,890,838
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           625,786
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        4,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  6,390,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             22,911,280
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               277,901
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              41,690
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               91,153
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              410,744
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            191,495
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            191,495
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         219,249
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               149,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                72,446
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     72,446
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   50,045
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.34
<LOANS-NON>                                   113,100
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               60,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              60,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           60,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0


</TABLE>
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 106 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire 

in New York City on March 25, 1911, and designating the week of 

March 21, 2011, through March 25, 2011, as the ‘‘100th Anniversary 

of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Remembrance Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mrs. MURRAY) submitted 

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist 

Company fire in New York City on March 25, 1911, 

and designating the week of March 21, 2011, through 

March 25, 2011, as the ‘‘100th Anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Remembrance Week’’. 

Whereas the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire was the deadliest industrial disaster in the City of New York’s history 

and resulted in the 4th greatest loss of life from an industrial accident in the history of the United States, 

claiming the lives of 146 garment workers, many of 

whom were young immigrants; 

Whereas this human catastrophe exposed the need to 

strengthen labor laws, fire regulations, and health and 

safety protections for workers; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 106 ATS 

Whereas the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire helped spur 

the growth of the modern-day organized labor movement, 

particularly the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ 

Union, which continued to fight for better conditions for 

sweatshop workers; 

Whereas from the ashes of this horrific event emerged the 

modern celebration of International Women’s Day, and 

the death of 129 women workers in the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire demonstrated the need for workers’ 

rights and women’s rights; 

Whereas more than 5,000 workers lose their lives each year 

on the job, and protecting the health and safety of workers continues to be a critical issue in the United States 

today; and 

Whereas national events will be held to remember the victims 

of the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire, and to educate 

citizens about the important role this tragic event played 

in the history of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of 

2 March 21, 2011 through March 25, 2011 as the ‘‘100th 

3 Anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Re4 membrance Week’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.2

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                         ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                         NOTIFY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION



     The undersigned, Paul F. DePond and Gerald W. Rice, hereby certify that:

     1.  They are the duly elected and acting President and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of Notify Technology Corporation, a California
corporation.

     2.  The first sentence of Article III of the Articles of Incorporation of
this corporation is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

               "The total number of shares of stock the corporation shall have
     authority to issue is Thirty-Five Million (35,000,000), which shall be
     divided into two classes as follows: (a) Thirty Million (30,000,000) shares
     of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share (hereinafter "Common Stock"),
     and (b) Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, $0.001 par
     value per share (hereinafter "Preferred Stock")."

     3.  The foregoing amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly
approved by the Board of Directors.

     4.  The foregoing amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly
approved by the shareholders of this corporation in accordance with Sections 902
and 903 of the California Corporations Code. The total number of outstanding
shares of Common Stock entitled to vote with repect to the foregoing amendment
was 5,267,674 shares. The percentage vote required for the approval of the
amendment herein set forth was more than fifty percent (50%) of the Common Stock
of the corporation, voting as a single class.
<PAGE>

     The undersigned further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of
the State of California that the matters set forth in this Certificate are true
and correct of their own knowledge.

Dated:  July 11, 2001


                              /s/ Paul F. DePond
                              ---------------------------------------
                              Paul F. DePond, President


                              /s/ Gerald W. Rice
                              ---------------------------------------
                              Gerald W. Rice, Chief Financial Officer
Glenn Stearns, Chapter 13 Trustee Chapter 13 Trustee

4343 Commerce Court, Suite 120

Lisle, IL 60532-3614

Ph: (630) 577-1313 Fax: (630) 577-1341

In re:

ROBERT J PUTNAM

BARBARA L PUTNAM

Case No. 10-00927

ROBERT J PUTNAM

BARBARA L PUTNAM

2464 PRAIRIE CROSSING DR.

MONTGOMERY, IL 60538

C DAVID WARD

540 N BROADWAY

AURORA, IL 60505

FIFTH THIRD BANK

MADISON OPERATIONS CTR

MD IMOC 2O

CINCINNATI, OH 45263

NOTICE OF PAYMENT OF FINAL MORTGAGE CURE AMOUNT UNDER PARAGRAPH B (2) (b) OF PLAN

Please take notice that the final payment of the cure amount specified in Paragraph 5 of Section E of the confirmed plan 

of the above referenced debtor has been paid. Pursuant to the plan, all pre-petition obligations of the debtor have been 

satisfied and the mortgage holder is required to treat the mortgage as reinstated and fully current unless the debtor has failed 

to make timely payments of post-petition obligations.

If the debtor has failed to make timely payments of any post-petition obligation, the mortgage holder is required to 

itemize all outstanding payment obligations as of the date of the notice and file a statement of these obligations with the 

court. The notice shall be filed with the court within sixty (60) days (or as such longer time as the court may order) of the 

service of the notice of cure from the Trustee and the notice shall be served to the debtor, debtor’s attorney, and the standing 

trustee. If the mortgage holder fails to file and serve a statement of outstanding obligations within the required time, the 

holder is then required to treat the mortgage as reinstated according to its original terms and fully current as of the date of the 

trustee’s notice.

If the mortgage holder does serve a statement of outstanding obligations within the required time, the debtor may (i), 

within thirty (30) days of the service of the statement, challenge the accuracy of the statement by a motion filed with the 

court as a contested matter with notice to the mortgage holder and the standing trustee or (ii), propose a modified plan to 

provide for payment of additional amounts that the debtor acknowledges or the court determines to be due. To the extent 

that the amounts set forth on a timely filed statement of outstanding obligations are not determined by the court to be invalid 

or are not paid by the debtor through a modified plan, the right of the mortgage holder to collect these amounts will be 

unaffected. 

Any costs of collection, including attorney fees, incurred by the mortgage holder after filing of this bankruptcy case and 

before the final payment of the cure amount specified in Paragraph 5 of Section E may be added to that cure amount pursuant 

to court order on motion of the holder. Otherwise, any such costs of collection shall be claimed pursuant to sub -paragraph 

(b) above.

The undersigned certifies that this notice was sent to the above named parties on May 19, 2011.

 /S/ Marifran Smith

For: Glenn Stearns, Chapter 13 Trustee, Standing Trustee

Case 10-00927 Doc 35 Filed 05/19/11 Entered 05/19/11 11:43:48 Desc Page 1

 of 1
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AND BROADSPIRE

,
Appellant s ,

v.

LORI WATSON, AS LEGA L GUARDIAN OF BRENDA WHITESIDE

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5231

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2016.

An appeal f rom an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Ellen H. Lorenzen , Judge

.
Date of Accident: August 23, 2007.

Katherine Stone of Barbas

, Nunez, Sanders, Butler & Hovsepian, Tampa , for Appellant s

.

Nicolette E. Tsambis of Smith, Feddeler & Smith, P.A., Lakeland , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 125 Filed: 11/29/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:643
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1815

CHRISTOPHER J. ODINKEMELU, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CONSOLIDATED STORES CORPORATION, d/b/a Big Lots Stores, Defendant - Appellee, and JORJIA WILLIAMS, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-826-2) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher J. Odinkemelu, Appellant Pro Se. Peter George Pappas, Larry I. Moore, III, ADAMS, KLEEMEIER, HAGAN, HANNAH & FOUTS, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Christopher Odinkemelu appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on his complaint alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Odinkemelu v. Consolidated Stores , No. CA-95-826-2 (M.D.N.C. May 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sontra Medical Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas W. Davison, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas W. Davison                
|Thomas W. Davison                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 16, 2004
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research: Mississippi State, MS
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Southeast Area Mississippi State, Mississippi Crop Science Research Laboratory Genetics and Sustainable Agriculture Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

Location not found
  (Employee information on this page comes from the REE Directory. Please contact your front office staff to update the REE Directory.)


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6471
GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSEPH MCQUEEN, Sheriff; CAPTAIN SMITH, Chief Jailer; NURSE GREGG; NURSE PENNY; NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC; NEW HANOVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-97-55-5-BO) Submitted: August 19, 1997 Decided: September 29, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Reynold Evans, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: George Reynold Evans, a North Carolina prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying his application to proceed without prepayment of fees under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915 (West Supp. 1997), and denying his motion for reconsideration. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a prisonerwho has had three or more actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, may not proceed without prepayment of fees unless the applicant is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(g) (West Supp. 1997). Evans has had three actions dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. The district court dismissed Evans v. North Carolina , No. 84-1152-CRT (November 1, 1984), as frivolous; the district court dismissed Evans v. Smith, No. 83-1294-CRT (December 7, 1983), for failure to state a claim upon relief could be granted; and the district court dismissed Evans v. Crooms , No. 81-876-HC (October 7, 1981), as frivolous. Additionally, we find that Evans has not demonstrated that he is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(g) (West Supp. 1997).We therefore affirm the district court's application to proceed without prepayment of fees and the district court's denial of Evans motion for reconsideration. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(g) (West Supp. 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and3 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED