alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule is an Amended Financial Data Schedule and contains summary
financial information extracted from the balance sheet as of June 30, 1998, and
statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 1998, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,151,201
<SECURITIES>                                   170,242
<RECEIVABLES>                                  756,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (30,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    490,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,771,199
<PP&E>                                       2,620,749
<DEPRECIATION>                               (823,939)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,143,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,087,282
<BONDS>                                        440,059
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,300
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,605,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,143,905
<SALES>                                      1,058,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,058,074
<CGS>                                          900,129
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  900,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,943,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             201,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,986,529)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,986,529)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,986,529)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1273

TINA JENKINS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MV TRANSPORTATION, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:14

- cv - 00702

- TDC )

Submitted : September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Tina Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert R. Niccolini, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D

. C

. , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tina Jenkins seeks to ap peal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to MV Transportation, Inc. in Jenkins’ employment action

. Parties to a civil action are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, the district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if a party moves for an extension of the appeal period within 30 days after the expiration of the original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect
or g ood cause to warrant an extension. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5); see Washington v. Bumgarner , 882 F.2d 899, 900

- 01 (4th Cir. 1989). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court’s final judgment was entered on the docket on January 25 , 201 8

. Jenkins’ notice of appeal was filed on March 8, 2018, after the expiration of the 30

- day appeal period but within the excusable neglect period. Because Jenkins’ notice of appeal offered some excuse for her untimeliness and requested that the district court accept her notice of a ppeal upon receipt , we construe it as a timely request for an extension of time to file an appeal. Accordingly, we rem and the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether the time for filing a notice of appeal should be extended under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for furth er consideration.
REMANDED
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Wheat Health, Genetics, and Quality Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




- History
- Western Regional Nurseries

Western Regional Nurseriesheadline bar Western Regionals Archive (2000 - 2014)
               2015 Western Regional Nurseries
               2016 Western Regional Nurseries
               2017 Western Regional Nurseries
               WRWN Evaluation Only MTA
               2018 Western Regional Nurseries
               2019 Western Regional Nurseries
               2020 Western Regional Nurseries
               2021 Western Regional Nurseries
               2022 Western Regional Nurseries
               2023 Western Regional Nurseries


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41997-41998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16543]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 030-38679-LA; ASLBP No. 21-972-01-LA-BD01]


In the Matter of Cammenga and Associates, LLC ; Establishment of 
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission, see 37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 
29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.103, 
2.104, 2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given 
that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established 
to preside over the following proceeding:

[[Page 41998]]

Cammenga and Associates, LLC

(Denial of License Amendment Requests)

    This Board is being established pursuant to a filing titled 
``Hearing Request'' submitted by Cammenga and Associates, LLC 
(Cammenga). The filing challenges the NRC Staff's decision in a July 1, 
2021 letter denying Cammenga's request for amendments to License No. 
21-26460-03E and Sealed Source and Device Registration Certificate NR-
0210-D-101-E.
    The Board is comprised of the following Administrative Judges:
    Ronald M. Spritzer, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    Nicholas G. Trikouros, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302.

    Rockville, Maryland.
    Dated: July 29, 2021.
Edward R. Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-16543 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Case: 1:02-cv-04394 Document #: 3 Filed: 08/12/02 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:19
Case: 1:02-cv-04394 Document #: 3 Filed: 08/12/02 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:20
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Databases
                        Alfalfa Transcription Factor Database
                                    iPhyClassifier - Phytoplasma Sequence ClassificationSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory People Anna Smigocki





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Con Baker
- Wei Wei
- Rosemarie Hammond
- Robert Davis
- John Hartung
- Ing Ming Lee
- Lev Nemchinov
- Anna Smigocki
- Yan Zhao
- The sugarbeet root maggot
- Reporter gene (uidA) in leaves
- Functional analysis of sugar beet resistance genes
- In vitro bioassay
- Cytokinin gene (ipt) mediated insect resistance
- Cytokinin-responsive genes
- Plant cytochrome P450 monooxygenases

Cytokinin gene (ipt) mediated insect resistanceheadline bar CYTOKININ GENE INDUCED INSECT RESISTANCE The cytokinin gene (*ipt*) mediated insect resistance has been shown to effectively enhance the resistance of transgenic plants to a number of insects. Leaf extracts prepared from resistant transgenic plants killed sugarbeet root maggot larvae.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Francisco Calderon, Appellant, v County of Westchester, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for false arrest and false imprisonment, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rubenfeld, J.), entered May 17, 1984, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court entered June 11, 1984, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Appeal from the order entered May 17, 1984 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order entered June 11, 1984, upon reargument.

Order entered June 11, 1984 affirmed, insofar as reviewed.

Respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Defendant County of Westchester’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Whether or not the county could be found vicariously liable for the tortious acts allegedly committed by the District Attorney’s office, these acts were quasi-judicial in nature. As such, the Assistant District Attorney here is entitled to absolute immunity from civil suit for the discretionary actions taken within the ambit of his official duties *(see, Imbler v Pachtman,*424 US 409; *Minicozzi v City of Glen Cove,*97 AD2d 815; *Brenner v County of Rockland,*67 AD2d 901, *lv denied*47 NY2d 705). It is clear from the allegations of the complaint that the acts complained of were not investigative in nature, but were committed in the furtherance of a criminal prosecution. Since the Assistant District Attorney is not subject to suit, neither is the County of Westchester. In reaching this conclusion, we do not pass upon the propriety of Special Term’s finding that the county and the District Attorney’s office are united in interest. O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Dale G. Rettinger, the Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership

A West Virginia Limited Partnership

By: Petroleum Development Corporation

Managing General Partner

By:  _/s/ Dale G. Rettinger___________________

Name: Dale G. Rettinger

Title: Chief Financial Officer of

          Petroleum Development Corporation

Date: __October 23, 2002_________________

WSH\81705.1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT 9/30/2000 (UNAUDITED) AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR CHOICETEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      153
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1427
<PP&E>                                            2685
<DEPRECIATION>                                      36
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                        7643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9374
<SALES>                                             76
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   101
<CGS>                                               70
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1046)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1046)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1046)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Written Statement
Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 The undersigned, Brent W. Christensen, the Chief Financial Officer of
Meade Instruments Corp. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby
certifies that: (i) the Form 10Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2004 of the
Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: October 15, 2004 By: /s/ Brent W. Christensen This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
34.810(2). Appellant's petition was procedurally barred absent a

demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3). Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, appellant was required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice. NRS 34.800(2).

Appellant argued that Martinez a. Ryan, 566 U.S. , 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012), provided good cause to overcome his procedural bars. Even assuming without deciding that Martinez applies to state habeas corpus proceedings, appellant was still untimely because his petition was not filed within a reasonable time of the publishing of that decision. See Hathaway a. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). Moreover, appellant failed to overcome the presumption of prejudice to the State pursuant to NRS 34.800(2). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3

3 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 19)17Acc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Zel Norman Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3

(0) 194Th
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16
                                                                   -------------

                               SECOND AMENDMENT
                                    TO THE
                          LASALLE RE HOLDINGS LIMITED
                         1996 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
                         -----------------------------


     WHEREAS, LaSalle Re Holdings Limited (the "Company") maintains the LaSalle
Re Holdings Limited 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan");

     WHEREAS, the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company (the
"Board") may amend the Plan at any time;

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan be and is hereby amended,
effective September 25, 1998, by adding the following new section 7A to the Plan
as a part thereof:

                                  "SECTION 7A
                                   ----------

                         FIFTH ANNIVERSARY STOCK AWARD
                         -----------------------------

               Each Eligible Individual who has completed five years of service
          with the Company or a Related Company (including service performed as
          an employee of CNA (Bermuda) Services Limited or Aon Risk Consultants
          (Bermuda) Ltd.) who has not previously been granted an award under the
          Plan shall be granted Stock on the earlier of (i) the fifth
          anniversary of such Eligible Individual's date of hire by the Company
          or a Related Company or (ii) in the case of an Eligible Individual who
          performed services for the Company or a Related Company prior to such
          date of hire, the fifth anniversary of the date on which such Eligible
          Individual began performing such services, subject in each case to
          approval of such award by the Committee.  The amount of Stock granted
          to the Eligible Individual shall be equal to 10% of his or her base
          salary as of such anniversary date, divided by the Fair Market Value
          of a share of Stock on the business day coincident with such
          anniversary date, or if such anniversary date is not a business day,
          the first business day immediately prior to such anniversary date;
          provided that such Eligible Individual is employed by the Company or a
          Related Company on such anniversary date."
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:612
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 2 of 17 PageID #:613
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 3 of 17 PageID #:614
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 4 of 17 PageID #:615
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 5 of 17 PageID #:616
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 6 of 17 PageID #:617
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 7 of 17 PageID #:618
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 8 of 17 PageID #:619
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 9 of 17 PageID #:620
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 10 of 17 PageID #:621
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 11 of 17 PageID #:622
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 12 of 17 PageID #:623
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 13 of 17 PageID #:624
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 14 of 17 PageID #:625
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 15 of 17 PageID #:626
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 16 of 17 PageID #:627
Case: 1:02-cr-00312 Document #: 128 Filed: 08/18/04 Page 17 of 17 PageID #:628