alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
28 April 2015 Fourteenth Court ofAppeals 301 Fannin, Room 245 Houston, TX 77002 RE: Case No. 14-15-00370-CV; In Re: Connie Vasquez Harrison; 14 Court ofAppeals

- Houston [14^^ District] Dear Sirs: 

### Terry L. Hart Attorney at Law
4265 Sail Felipe,Suite 1100 Houston TX 77027 Email; i]iart@teiTyhartla\v.com ® 713.968.9818 ® 713.968.9817 © 713.898.9129



### I efiled a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on Sunday morning, August 26, 2015 

### withthe 14^*^ Court ofAppeals. Iwas advised by the court clerk that there was a problem with this filing. Iattempted to refile the petition earliertoday, but am now advised that the newly filed petition is different than the original one. The correct petition is the one I attempted to file on Sunday morning. Attached is a new copy of that petition. Please accept this petition as the correctfiling. Sincerely,
Terry

# L.flart 

# Lit

Enc. ACCEPTED 14-15-00370-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/28/2015 3:09:29 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
#### McLAUGHLIN v. COLLINS BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION CO. et al.

(Supreme Court., Appellate Division, First Department.

May, 1907.)

Action by Charles McLaughlin against the Collins Building & Construction Company and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

In re: § Case No.

§

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE'S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Wand, Vincent 10 B 00902

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

§

§

Debtor

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

 1) The case was filed on 01/12/2010.

 2) The plan was confirmed on (NA).

 3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 

on (NA).

 4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the

plan on (NA).

 5) The case was dismissed on 03/11/2010.

 6) Number of months from filing or conversion to last payment: 0.

 7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

 8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: (NA).

 9) Total value of assets exempted: $0.00.

 10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without full payment: $0.

 11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank. 

EASTERN DIVISION

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00902 Doc 15 Filed 04/28/10 Entered 04/28/10 09:05:20 Desc Page 1

 of 4
Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor

Receipts:

$0

Less amount refunded to debtor $0

NET RECEIPTS: $0

Attorney's Fees Paid Through the Plan

Expenses of Administration:

$0

Court Costs $0

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0

Other $0

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Int.

Paid

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Principal

Paid

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00902 Doc 15 Filed 04/28/10 Entered 04/28/10 09:05:20 Desc Page 2

 of 4
Mortgage Ongoing

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

$0

Interest

Paid

Claim

Allowed

Principal

Paid

Secured Payments:

$0 $0

Mortgage Arrearage $0 $0 $0

Debt Secured by Vehicle $0 $0 $0

All Other Secured $0 $0 $0

TOTAL SECURED: $0 $0 $0

Domestic Support Arrearage $0

Priority Unsecured Payments:

$0 $0

Domestic Support Ongoing $0 $0 $0

All Other Priority $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PRIORITY: $0 $0 $0

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS: $0 $0 $0

Expenses of Administration

Disbursements:

$0

Disbursements to Creditors $0

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: $0

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00902 Doc 15 Filed 04/28/10 Entered 04/28/10 09:05:20 Desc Page 3

 of 4
 This Uniform Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork 

Reduction Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies. 

STATEMENT:

 12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, the

estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all administrative

matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee requests a final decree

be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may be just and proper. 

Date: April 27, 2010

Trustee

By:

/s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00902 Doc 15 Filed 04/28/10 Entered 04/28/10 09:05:20 Desc Page 4

 of 4
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frank J. Vetro, Appellant. Hampton Bays Union Free School District, Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 291]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 23, 2010, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment through misconduct.

Claimant, a high school principal, resigned his position in lieu of termination following his arrest on multiple counts of aggravated harassment in connection with harassing phone calls allegedly made to various women, including a teacher at a different school. He ultimately pleaded guilty to two of the counts, which were later reduced to harassment in the second degree. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was discharged from his employment due to misconduct. While claimant points out that these convictions stemmed from activity unrelated to his employment, “[m]isconduct committed during nonworking hours, which raises serious questions as to a worker[’s] integrity, bears a relationship to his [or her] work within the meaning of . . . the Labor Law” *(Matter of Cummings [Commissioner of Labor],*69 AD3d 1088, 1089 [2010] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see *Matter of Rose [New York City Dept. of Social Servs.*—Hudacs], 190 AD2d 926 [1993]; *Matter of McCollum [New York City Dept. of Transp. Bur. of*Highways— *Roberts],*126 AD2d 833, 833-834 [1987], *lv denied*69 NY2d 613 [1987]).

The remaining arguments advanced by claimant have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Peters, EJ., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Databases
                        Alfalfa Transcription Factor Database
                                    iPhyClassifier - Phytoplasma Sequence ClassificationSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory People Anna Smigocki





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Con Baker
- Wei Wei
- Rosemarie Hammond
- Robert Davis
- John Hartung
- Ing Ming Lee
- Lev Nemchinov
- Anna Smigocki
- Yan Zhao
- The sugarbeet root maggot
- Reporter gene (uidA) in leaves
- Functional analysis of sugar beet resistance genes
- In vitro bioassay
- Cytokinin gene (ipt) mediated insect resistance
- Cytokinin-responsive genes
- Plant cytochrome P450 monooxygenases

Cytokinin-responsive genesheadline bar TRANSGENIC RESPONIVE GENES FROM TRANSGENIC IPT PLANTS Cytokinin-responsive genes have been cloned from transgenic plants expressing the *ipt* gene and genes with potential roles in resistance mechanisms were identified (cytochrome P450).


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Keindl, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), rendered May 10, 1984, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (eight counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (10 counts), sexual abuse in the second degree (five counts), and endangering the welfare of a child (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention that the requirements of Penal Law § 130.16 were not met, we note that "independent corroborative evidence need not prove defendant’s guilt to a moral certainty, but need simply harmonize with the victim’s testimony in such a manner as to furnish the necessary connection between the defendant and the crime” *(People v De Vyver,*89 AD2d 745, 747). Those requirements were met at *680bar. Defendant failed to preserve his claim of repugnancy for our review *(see, People v Stahl,*53 NY2d 1048, 1050). In any event, "viewed in light of the elements of each crime as charged to the jury”, the verdicts of guilty of sexual abuse in the first and second degrees and not guilty of certain counts of sodomy in the first and second degrees were not repugnant *(People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1, 4). Further, defendant’s sentence on the sodomy counts of concurrent terms of imprisonment of *8 Vs*to 25 years (and lesser concurrent terms on the other counts) was neither an abuse of discretion nor a sentence which we choose to modify in our interest of justice jurisdiction *(People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80) in light of the nature of defendant’s crimes, their frequency and the sheer number of times they occurred over a period of years *(see, People v Anderson,*99 AD2d 560; *People v Corbett,*68 AD2d 772, *affd*52 NY2d 714). We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Geographics, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-49888) on Form S-8 of Geographics, Inc. of our report dated June 28, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Geographics, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash
flows for the year ended March 31, 2001, and all related schedules, which
report appears in the March 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of
Geographics, Inc.

Our report dated June 28, 2001, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered a net loss, has a working capital deficiency, and
an accumulated deficit, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/KPMG LLP

July 16, 2001
Seattle, Washington
# CE2004078EN.01079901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/799 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/799

---

(2004/C 78 E/0848)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3298/03

by Ian Hudghton (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(3 November 2003)

Subject:   Effect of climatic change on cod stocks

Subject:

There is widespread anecdotal evidence, supported by the fishermen with the real experience of fishing northern waters, that stocks of cod are moving north as sea temperatures increase. This is supported by scientific research including, notably, that which was published in Science Magazine vol. 296 No 5573 relating to work done by the Sir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science.

Does the Commission intend to factor in any such new evidence when making its recommendations to the Council prior to this December's Fisheries Council meeting?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(19 November 2003)

(19 November 2003)

The Commission values the knowledge and experience of commercial fishermen and encourages them to make their views available to the scientific agencies that advise the Commission as well as directly to the Commission. However, when making a basis for conservation proposals that will have a large impact on fishing communities, it is appropriate to accord higher importance to the results of systematic and scientifically-designed surveys and monitoring systems than to anecdotal observations.

The work referred to indicates a northward shift in copepod distributions and the effect of this on distributions of fish is not clear. However, both science and industry concur that the remaining aggregations of cod are now located further north than their historic distribution patterns. In previous cases of stock collapse it has been the case that as fish stocks become smaller their area of distribution shrinks as the last few fish aggregate in the most favourable areas.

Indications of a reduction in the distribution of fish onto a smaller area are therefore an additional warning sign that the stock is at a low level and very vulnerable to exploitation.

The Commission will effectively have such factors in mind when preparing relevant conservation proposals.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

BEA SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of BEA Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alfred S. Chuang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

Date: November 15, 2007



/s/ Alfred S. ChuangAlfred S. ChuangChief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demani Jawara BOSKET, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6800.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 8, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 25, 2011.

Demani Jawara Bosket, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Demani Jawara Bosket seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bosket has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, *640we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Clonal Germplasm Repository: Corvallis, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Plant Collections
                        Home
                                    Plant Collecting Expeditions
                                    Germplasm CGC Reports
                                    GRIN-Global
                                    Outreach
                                    Documents
                    USDASearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Corvallis, Oregon National Clonal Germplasm Repository Docs







Documentsheadline bar  Bushakra Black Raspberry RNA Sequence Table 1, 2015


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Pullman, Washington Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research Docs





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Staff Organizational Chart
- Pullman Facilities
- Central Ferry Farm
- Prosser Facilities
- Frank Dugan

Ted Kishaheadline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Showers, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Crowley, J. — burglary, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.