alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21



SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF CAREMARK RX, INC. (1)



|                                   |  |                                                        |  |                                                            
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Legal Name                         |  | State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation
or Organization |  | Also Doing Business As                                     
|                                   |  |                                                       
|Caremark International Inc.        |  | Delaware                                               |  | N/A                                                        
|                                   |  |                                                       
|Caremark Inc.                      |  | California                                             |  | Caremark Prescription ServicesCaremark Therapeutic Services
|                                   |  |                                                       
|CaremarkPCS                        |  | Delaware                                               |  | AdvancePCS Caremark                                        
|                                   |  |                                                       
|AdvancePCS Holding Corporation     |  | Delaware                                               |  | N/A                                                        
|                                   |  |                                                       
|CaremarkPCS Health Systems, L.L.C. |  | Delaware                                               |  | N/A                                                        
|                                   |  |                                                       
|ADVP Consolidation, L.L.C.         |  | Delaware                                               |  | N/A                                                        
|                                   |  |                                                       
|CaremarkPCS Health, L.P.           |  | Delaware                                               |  | Caremark                                                   

---

|(1) | Certain subsidiaries of Caremark Rx, Inc. have been omitted from the above listing pursuant to Item 601(b)(21)(ii) of Regulation S-K. These subsidiaries would, if considered in
the aggregate as a single subsidiary, not constitute a significant subsidiary as this term is defined by the SEC.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 92

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Bureau of

Labor Statistics alone should make any adjustments, if any are needed,

to the methodology used to determine the Consumer Price Index.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 12, 1997

Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts,

and Mr. GONZALEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the Bureau of Labor Statistics alone should make any

adjustments, if any are needed, to the methodology used

to determine the Consumer Price Index.

Whereas the Consumer Price Index currently informs our

Nation’s monetary policy and determines both the level of

taxes paid and the amount of government benefits received by millions of Americans, many of them on fixed

incomes;

Whereas the Consumer Price Index is assumed in these uses

to be an accurate and appropriate measurement;

Whereas the Consumer Price Index is only useful if it is a

technical, not a political measurement;
2

•HRES 92 IH

Whereas it is of the utmost importance to maintain the integrity and objectivity of the determination process and of

the reliability of the Federal statistical system; and

Whereas it is the Bureau of Labor Statistics that has the expertise, tools, resources, and experience to maintain this

integrity and objectivity: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Bureau of Labor Statistics alone

3 should make any adjustments, if any are needed, to the

4 methodology used to determine the Consumer Price Index.

Æ
#### COWARD, Respondent, v. VINES et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by Agnes L. Coward, as administratrix,' against George W. Vines and others.

No opinion. Judgment modified as to the defendant Rose Vines, by excepting her inchoate dower right and providing in the judgment that property be sold subject thereto, without costs, and as to the other defendants affirmed, with costs.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Western Human Nutrition Research Center: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Laboratories
                        Allen Group
                                    Bennett Group
                                    Stephensen Group
                                    Human Studies
                                    Metabolic Kitchen
                                    Huang Group
                                    Kable Group
                                    Keim Group
                                    Laugero Group
                                    Newman Group
                                    Lemay Group
                                    Support Staff
                    About Us
                        HistorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Western Human Nutrition Research Center People





Ellen  Bonnel    Human Study Coordinator


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 1 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 2 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 3 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 4 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 5 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 6 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 7 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 8 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 9 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 10 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 11 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 12 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 13 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 14 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 15 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 16 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 17 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 18 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 19 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 20 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 21 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 22 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 23 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 24 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 25 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 26 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 27 of 28
Case 1:01-cv-00723 Document 1 Filed 02/02/01 Page 28 of 28
SCPW-20-0000628

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

THOMAS FRANK SCHMIDT and LORINNA JHINCIL SCHMIDT, Petitioners,

vs.

THE HONORABLE HENRY T. NAKAMOTO, Judge of the Circuit Court of

the Third Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,

and

HSC, INC., a Hawai#i Corporation; RICHARD HENDERSON, SR.;

and ELEANOR R.J. HENDERSON, Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CIVIL NO. 3CC061000228)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., McKenna and Wilson, JJ.,

Circuit Judge Cataldo, assigned in place of Recktenwald, C.J.,

recused, and Circuit Judge Remigio, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of petitioner Thomas Frank Schmidt

and Lorinna Jhincil Schmidt’s motion for reconsideration, filed

on November 23, 2020, the documents submitted in support thereof,

and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 2, 2020.

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Catherine H. Remigio

/s/ Lisa W. Cataldo

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-20-0000628

02-DEC-2020

12:06 PM

Dkt. 24 ODMR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            6393
<SECURITIES>                                      9965
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2068
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1871
<INVENTORY>                                       2585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 23458
<PP&E>                                             569
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   24027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4203
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         27684
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     24027
<SALES>                                          19167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19167
<CGS>                                            10979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (784)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (4168)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4299)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.5


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B)


OR RULE 15D-14 (B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE


ACT OF 1934 AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18


OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


In connection with the Annual Report of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Bruce Flatt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:/s/ J. Bruce FlattJ. Bruce FlattChief Executive Officer


April 2, 2018
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research: Ames, IA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Additional ResourcesSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Ames, Iowa National Animal Disease Center Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Research Projects

Indira  Kudva
                     

                     Research Microbiologist
                     


                        ProjectsIntestinal Microbial Ecology and Non-Antibiotic Strategies to Limit Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Antimicrobial Resistance Transmission in Food Animals
                                       In-House Appropriated

                                                   (D)Accession Number: 438679


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40346

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GABRIEL AMAYA-ARCE, also known as Esquivel Bocanegra

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:07-CR-1143-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gabriel Amaya-Arce

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Amaya-Arce has not responded. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### Todd Brewer WEEKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Albert TUFONO; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-15982.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 25, 2011.

Todd Brewer Weeks, Kaneohe, HI, pro se.

Diane K. Taira, Esquire, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Hawaii Attorney General, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Todd Brewer Weeks, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process, retaliation, and equal protection claims against state parole board officials for denying him parole. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000); *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed all of Weeks’s claims because parole board officials are entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity for decisions to “grant, deny, or revoke parole,” which are “functionally comparable to tasks performed by judges.” *Swift v. California,*384 F.3d 1184, 1189 (9th Cir.2004) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

The district court properly found that Weeks’s claims were also barred because they were identical to claims that had been dismissed with prejudice in another § 1983 action. *See Cato v. United States,*70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n. 2 (9th Cir.1995) (dismissal appropriate where complaint “merely repeats pending or previously litigated claims” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Weeks’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### CARBONATING APPARATUS CO. v. GEARY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 22, 1907.)

1. Sales—Actions fob Price—Defenses—Fraud.

Where, in an action on notes given for a soda fountain, it appears that the purchaser not only used the fountain for more than a year, but that he also paid notes on the same, there is a failure to sustain the defense that the notes were obtained by false, representations.

2. Same—Failure of Consideration.

Where, in an action on notes given for a soda fountain, it appears that a deduction was made to cover some alleged defects, and that defendant continued to use the fountain and accepted the deduction as an adjustment, there is a failure to sustain the defense of failure of consideration.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Brooklyn, First District.

Action by the Carbonating Apparatus Company against Myron F. Geary. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered.

Argued before HIRSCHBERG, P. J., and WOODWARD, JENKS, GAYNOR, and MIDLER, JJ.

John C. Judge, for appellant.

Sutherland R. Haxtun, for respondent.

WOODWARD, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $72, with interest, upon four promissory notes given by the defendant to the plaintiff. Upon the trial the plaintiff produced the notes and certificate of protest, and proved that there was due upon them, with interest and protest fees, the sum of $85.33. This amount was not controverted by the defendant, and stands admitted. The further proof showed that the plaintiff had delivered to the defendant a soda fountain, to be paid for by installments, for which the notes in suit, among others, had been given, and that at the time of the trial the soda fountain was still in possession of the defendant.

The defendant, while admitting the making cf the notes, alleged in his answer that the notes had been obtained > Use and fraudulent representation. This, however, he fails to prov evidence that he not only used the fountain after obtaining it, but that he also had succes. on the same. Nor is the alleged failure of '*• is shown by the than one year .d various notes ation proved. A r some alleged de.ued to use the foundeduction of $20 was made to the defendant t fects; and as the defendant admits that he cos tain, and that he received and accepted the ded ytion as an adjustment, it is evident that he assumed, by the making of the notes, the obligation which devolves upon a maker of negotiable instruments.

*769The dismissal of the complaint was error, and the judgment of the Municipal Court should be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered; costs to abide the event. All concur.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **STATEMENT
        OF**
 **PRINCIPAL
        FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 I,
        Davinder Sethi, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report
        on Form
        10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 of Entrada Networks, Inc.
        fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d0 of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Annual Report
        on Form
        10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 of Entrada Networks, Inc
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of Entrada Networks, Inc.
 
 
 _/s/
                  Davinder Sethi ___Name:Davinder
                  SethiPrincipal
                  Financial OfficerDate:June
                  14, 2005