alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis F. Carrasquillo, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 891]

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered May 29, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for the filing of a predicate felony statement prior to resentencing.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]), defendant contends that his sentence as a second felony drug offender is illegal because he was never given the opportunity to challenge the prior felony conviction. Here, although defendant admitted that he had a prior felony conviction, the certificate of conviction does not reflect that defendant was sentenced as a second felony drug offender. The sentence therefore is illegal, and we modify the judgment by vacating the sentence, and we remit the matter to County Court for the filing of a predicate felony statement pursuant to CPL 400.21 prior to resentencing *(see People v Scarbrough,*66 NY2d 673, 674 [1985], *revg on dissenting op of Boomer, J., 105*AD2d 1107, 1107-1109 [1984]; *People v Ruddy,*51 AD3d 1134, 1135 [2008], *lv denied*12 NY3d 787 [2009]). Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 24, 2013

No. 04-12-00783-CV

THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v. 

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, Local 624

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-16015

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

No. 04-13-00109-CV

IN RE THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORAL ARGUMENT ADVISORY

The panel assigned to hear oral argument in these consolidated proceedings is familiar with 

the facts and requests that the parties be prepared to address the applicability, if any, of this court’s 

decision in City of Laredo v. Mojica, 399 S.W.3d 190 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012, pet. denied).

PER CURIAM

It is so ORDERED on July 24, 2013.

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 The proceeding in Cause No. 04-13-00109-CV arises out of Cause No. 2012-CI-16015, styled Int’l Ass’n 

of Fire Fighters, Local 624 v. City of San Antonio, pending in the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, 

the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe presiding. However, the orders complained of were signed by the 

Honorable Laura Salinas, presiding judge of the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 47/2006

of 12 January 2006         

fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2093/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 6 to 12 January 2006, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2093/2005, the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported shall be 22,88 EUR/t and be valid for a total maximum quantity of 55 175 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 January 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 335, 20.12.2005, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

----
NO. 07-10-00433-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL A JANUARY 27, 2011

CARMEX AUTO SALES, APPELLANT

v. EUSEBIO RODRIGUEZ AND ESTELA CANEZ, APPELLEE

FROM THE 84TH DISTRICT CO URT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY; NO. 38,083; HONORABLE WILLI AM D. SMITH, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS Appellant, Chriscella Mariscal d/b/a Carme x Auto Sales, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because he no longer desires to pursue it. No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant t he motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). All costs relat ed to this appeal are assessed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d). If dismissal wi ll prevent appellees from seeking relief to which they would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellees to file a timely motion for rehearing. No motion for rehearing from appellant will be entertained.
Mackey K. Hancock Justice
#### COMMON LAW SETTLEMENT COUNSEL, petitioner, v. Pearlie BAILEY, et al.

No. 08-307.

March 20, 2009.

Motion of Future Claimants Representatives for leave to participate in oral argument as *amici curiae*and for divided argument denied.
#### Walter Golembeski et al. *v.*Metichewan Grange No. 190 et al.

Decided March 28, 1990

*James K. Smith,*in support of the petition.

*Anthony M. Fitzgerald,*in opposition.

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 699, is denied.
Exhibit 10.5

Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation

Directors Annual Compensation

As of March 31, 2011



|                                                        |  |        |                 | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------ | --------------- | 
|Annual Retainer                                         |  | Amount |                
|                                                        | 
|Service as Director for the Company                     |  | $      | 2,000           | 
|Service as Director for the Bank                        |  | $      | 4,000           | 
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer                                     |  |        |                
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer for Chairman of the Board           |  | $      | 1,000           | 
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer for Vice Chairman of the Board      |  | $      | 500             | 
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer for Chair of Audit Committee        |  | $      | 1,500           | 
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer for Chair of Compensation Committee |  | $      | 1,000           | 
|                                                        | 
|Meeting Fees (Non-Employee Directors)                   |  |        |                
|                                                        | 
|Committee Meetings for the Company                      |  | $      | 250 per meeting | 
|Committee Meetings for the Bank                         |  | $      | 250 per meeting |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  Pen
Interconnect,  Inc., September 30, 1997 financial statements and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statments.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001000266
<NAME>                        Pen Interconnect, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                          657,777
<SECURITIES>                                    252,739 
<RECEIVABLES>                                 3,459,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (108,575)
<INVENTORY>                                   3,680,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              8,270,029
<PP&E>                                        4,158,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,680,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               14,090,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         9,984,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            50,184
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                    3,815,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 14,090,656
<SALES>                                      17,091,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             17,091,432
<CGS>                                        15,892,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                21,768,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (1,140,078)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,100,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,677,523)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   767,860
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,445,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,445,383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)
        



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41963-41964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16634]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION


Publication of FY 2018 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

[[Page 41964]]


ACTION: Notice of public availability of FY 2018 service contract 
inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 734 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection (Bureau) is publishing this notice to advise the 
public of the availability of the FY 2018 service contract inventory. 
This inventory provides information on service contract actions over 
$25,000, which the Bureau funded during FY 2018. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources were used by the 
agency to support its mission. The inventory has been developed in 
accordance with the guidance issued by the Office of Management and 
Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). The Bureau has 
posted its inventory on the Bureau's Open Government homepage at the 
following link: http://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/doing-business-with-us/past-awards/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nikki Burley, Senior Procurement 
Analyst, Office of Procurement, at 202-435-0329, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a547371717334586f68767f635a797c6a78347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84caedefefedaac6f1f6e8e1fdc4e7e2f4e6aae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>. If you require this document in an alternative 
electronic format, please contact <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#db989d8b99849ab8b8bea8a8b2b9b2b7b2afa29bb8bdabb9f5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="31727761736e7052525442425853585d58454871525741531f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 30, 2021.
Jocelyn Sutton,
Deputy Chief of Staff, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2021-16634 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### KNAUER v. KNAUER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Divorce—Contempt—Failure to Pat Alimont.

A defendant in a divorce action, who fails without excuse to comply with a judgment requiring the payment of alimony, may be punished for contempt, notwithstanding the pendency of a motion by him to set aside the judgment.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 17, Divorce, § 756.]°

*492Appeal from Special Term.

Action by Alvina J. ICnauer against Adam C. Knauer. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion to punish defendant for contempt in failing to pay alimony as directed by a judgment, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

Argued before PATTERSON, P. J., and INGRAHAM, CLARICE. SCOTT, and LAMBERT, JJ.

George E. Morgan and Sidney Smith, for appellant.

Harry R. Berliniclce and Harry C. Adams, for respondent.

INGRAHAM, J.

This action was for a limited divorce upon the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Answer was interposed by the defendant, in which he admitted the marriage and denied each and every other allegation of the complaint. The answer was not verified by the defendant, but by his attorney. The action came on for trial, and, the defendant not appearing, final judgment was entered for the plaintiff on the 28th of February, 1907, requiring the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $4 per week. A certified copy of this judgment was served upon the defendant on the 2d of March, 1907. Defendant having failed to comply with the judgment, a formal demand was made upon him on the 9th of July, 1907, for the payment of $56, that being the amount then due, which being refused, this motion was made to punish the defendant for contempt.

Not the slightest excuse for this failure to pay was submitted; the only answer to plaintiff’s application being that the defendant’s attorney stated that he had made a motion to' set aside the judgment, and requesting a postponement of this motion to punish for contempt until after a decision on the motion to set aside the judgment. The judgment was in all respects regular, not the slightest excuse for failing to comply with its provisions was presented, and, unless the parties to an action are to be allowed to disobey with impunity mandates of the Supreme Court, this judgment should be enforced. If the defendant should be relieved from the consequences of his default, he was not relieved from obedience to the judgment while it was in force. The judgment required the' defendant to pay to the plaintiff a sum of money for her support. It was disobeyed, and' plaintiff was clearly entitled to invoke the power of the court to compel obedience to its judgment.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed, with'$10 costs and disbursements, and the motion to punish the defendant for contempt is granted, with $10 costs. All concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crops Pathology and Genetics Research: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Outreach Events
                        UC Davis Picnic Day
                                    Kinders go to College
                                    STEM Girls
                                    Future Scientist Program
                                    Agriculture Future of America
                                    Wallace-Carver Fellowship
                                    Young Scholars Program
                                    Annual Awards Banquet
                    About Us
                        About Us
                                    Our Mission
                                    Principal InvestigatorsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Docs





- Kendra Baumgartner
- Gregory Browne
- Cai-Zhong Jiang
- Takao Kasuga
- Daniel Kluepfel
- Andrew McElrone
- Amisha Poret-Peterson
- Kerri Steenwerth
- Mysore Sudarshana
- Thomas Tai
- Steven Ostoja

Kinders go to College - Woodland, CAheadline bar Kinders go to College 2019 Kinders go to College 2018


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Morales, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered August 29, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The evidence, as adduced at the *Mapp*hearing, supported the hearing court’s determination that probable cause to arrest defendant was established. The arresting officers were acting pursuant to a radio transmission received from an undercover officer who personally observed defendant’s participation in the drug transaction for which he was arrested *(cf. People v King,*113 AD2d 905). In any event, defendant lacks standing to seek the suppression of the physical evidence herein, which was obtained from the person of an accomplice. Fourth Amendment rights are personal in nature and cannot be vicariously asserted *(Rakas v Illinois,*439 US 128, 133-134; *People v Cacioppo,*104 AD2d 559, 560). In light of the foregoing, defendant may not challenge the search of his accomplice, which revealed the "prerecorded buy money” utilized in making the drug purchase.

Defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review the *672issue of the sufficiency of the plea allocution *(see, People v Hoke,*62 NY2d 1022; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Gonzalez,*110 AD2d 909). In any event, the record demonstrates that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently pleaded guilty *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). Finally, the sentence imposed was that which was promised when the plea was accepted, and was not harsh or excessive *(see, People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Lazer, J. P., Rubin, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 82A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.082.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 82A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5416 March 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.082.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 82A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5416 March 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2011/C 082A/01 | Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/206/11 (AD 5) and EPSO/AD/207/11 (AD 7) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2011/C 082A/01

Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/206/11 (AD 5) and EPSO/AD/207/11 (AD 7)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 23

- 00342

- CV

Diane Elizabeth “Betsy” Cornwell , Appellant

v. Walden Hagelman, Andie Haddad, and Dana Havlin , Appellee s

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 23

- 000368 , THE HO NORABLE MARIA CANTÚ HEXSEL , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

P ER CURIAM

After learning of the death of Appellant Diane Elizabeth “ Betsy ” Corn well , Appe llees Walden Hag elman, Andie Haddad, and Dana Hav lin have r equest ed that we remand

th is ca use and thereby lift a stay to permi t them to nonsuit the case in the trial court

. We grant their request. This interlocutory appeal is abated and this cause is

remanded for the l i mited purpose of allowing Appellees to nonsuit this case. When the cau se is

nonsuited , this a pp eal may be reinstated upon motion by a party and dismissed

.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justi ces Kelly and Theofanis

Abated and Remanded

Filed: October 6, 2023
Case: 1:02-cv-02443 Document #: 34 Filed: 11/14/03 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:190

Case: 1:02-cv-02443 Document #: 34 Filed: 11/14/03 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:191