alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008283EN.01S00301.xml

| 7.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



BEA SYSTEMS, INC.



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the periodic report of BEA Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William M. Klein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.



|                       |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: December 9, 2004 |  | /s/ William M. Klein                    
|                       |  | William M. Klein Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet as of December 31, 1999 and the Statement of Operations for the nine
months ended December 31, 1999,included on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period
ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               8
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   418
<PP&E>                                               1
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              510
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                        (95)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       427
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    32
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (29)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (29)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.001)


</TABLE>
The Honorable John B. Jones, United States District Judge for 1

the District of South Dakota.

___________

No. 95-3564

 No. 96-1068

___________

Edward Ronwin, *

*

 Appellant, *

* Appeals from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of South Dakota.

Dori Altman, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

 Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 26, 1996 

 Filed: August 12, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Edward Ronwin sued Dori Altman for personal injuries alleged to have

resulted from a low-speed, rear-end automobile collision. A jury returned

a verdict in favor of Altman, and judgment was entered on that verdict.

The District Court denied Ronwin's post-trial motions. Ronwin appeals,

1

seeking reversal on several grounds.

Having considered all the issues Ronwin has raised in these appeals,

we conclude that the District Court committed no error of law and did not

abuse its discretion in denying Ronwin's post-trial motions. Because the

case lacks precedential value, we affirm the
-2-

judgment below without further discussion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
II

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1014

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include liability to pay

compensation under workmen’s compensation acts within the rules relating to certain personal liability assignments.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14, 1997

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include

liability to pay compensation under workmen’s compensation acts within the rules relating to certain personal

liability assignments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1014 IS

1 SECTION 1. ASSIGNMENT OF WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION

2 LIABILITY ELIGIBLE FOR EXCLUSION RELAT3 ING TO PERSONAL INJURY LIABILITY AS4 SIGNMENTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 130 of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain

7 personal injury liability assignments) is amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘, or as compensation under

9 any workmen’s compensation act,’’ after ‘‘(whether

10 by suit or agreement)’’ in the material preceding

11 paragraph (1),

12 (2) by inserting ‘‘or the workmen’s compensa13 tion claim,’’ after ‘‘agreement,’’ in paragraph (1),

14 and

15 (3) by striking ‘‘section 104(a)(2)’’ in para16 graph (2)(D) and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1) or (2) of

17 section 104(a)’’.

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 subsection (a) shall apply to claims under workmen’s com20 pensation acts filed after the date of the enactment of this

21 Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2024

DONNA M. CONNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION; TIM STEPHEN; SANDRA STERN; JESSICA BARONDES,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:04-cv-00117-HCM-JEB)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donna Marie Conner, Appellant Pro Se. David James Sensenig, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, Charles Michael Sims, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Donna Marie Conner appeals the district court’s order
denying her Rule 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Conner’s motion
to appoint counsel and transfer case, and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Conner v. Lions Gate Entm't

Corp. , No. 4:04-cv-00117-HCM-JEB (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Buckner Woodford, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kentucky Bancshares,
Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.
Date:   March 30, 2004
BY  /s/ Buckner Woodford
Buckner Woodford
President & Chief Executive Officer
84
84
FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION

I, Dale G. Rettinger, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-Q of PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 7, 2003                
 /s/ Dale G. Rettinger                                 

Dale G. Rettinger

Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation 

Managing General Partner of PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership
#### Thomas Puccini, Respondent, v Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Inc., Appellant.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and breach of warranty, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), dated December 14, 1984, which denied its motion to dismiss the action for want of prosecution and granted plaintiff’s cross motion for an extension of time to serve a complaint.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Special Term properly exercised its discretion based upon a demonstration of reasonable excuse for delay, an adequate affidavit of merits and the absence of prejudice to defendant. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 293A/15 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 293A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5115 November 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 293A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5115 November 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 293A/01 | Vacancy for a Director (Grade AD 14) of the European Institute for Innovation and Technology (EIT), Budapest — COM/2008/10133 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2008/C 293A/01

Vacancy for a Director (Grade AD 14) of the European Institute for Innovation and Technology (EIT), Budapest — COM/2008/10133

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Order entered August 5, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00615-CR

EX PARTE JAMES MICHAEL DRAUCKER

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WR-1-22-0006

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 2, 2022 pro se motion for a personal 

recognizance bond. Appellant is represented by counsel, and he is not entitled to 

hybrid representation. See Ex parte Bohannan, 350 S.W.3d 116, 116 n.1 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2011). Accordingly, appellant’s pro se motion is DENIED without 

prejudice.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 171 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 171

     Recognizing and supporting National Train Day on May 7, 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2011

   Mr. Lautenberg (for himself, Mr. Rockefeller, Mrs. Hutchison, Ms. 
    Mikulski, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Carper, Mr. 
  Sanders, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Coons, and Mr. Merkley) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Recognizing and supporting National Train Day on May 7, 2011.

Whereas Amtrak was founded on May 1, 1971, bringing together the passenger train 
        operations of 20 separate rail companies;
Whereas Amtrak is celebrating its 40th anniversary of providing passenger rail 
        service to the country;
Whereas Amtrak introduced high-speed Acela Express service, the fastest train in 
        North America, to the Northeast Corridor in 2000;
Whereas Amtrak ridership increased in each of the 17 months between November 
        2009 and March 2011;
Whereas in 2011, Amtrak will send an ``exhibit train'' to travel the country 
        with educational exhibits and historical styling to showcase the 
        railroad's history to the public;
Whereas Amtrak trains and infrastructure carry commuters to and from work in 
        congested metropolitan areas, providing a reliable rail option and 
        reducing congestion on roads and in the skies;
Whereas for many rural Americans, Amtrak represents the only major intercity 
        transportation link to the rest of the country;
Whereas passenger trains provide a more fuel-efficient transportation system, 
        cleaner transportation alternatives, and energy security;
Whereas on a per-passenger-mile basis, intercity passenger rail was 25 percent 
        more energy efficient than airplanes and 30 percent more energy 
        efficient than automobiles in 2008;
Whereas Amtrak provided intercity passenger rail travel to 28,700,000 Americans 
        in 46 States during fiscal year 2010; and
Whereas community railroad stations are a source of civic pride, a gateway to 
        over 500 of our Nation's communities, and a tool for economic growth: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and ideals of National 
Train Day, as designated by Amtrak.
                                 <all>
```
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Scott Soltes

Decided March 1, 1990

*Timothy J. Sugrue,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, *Mary M. Galvin,*state’s attorney, and *Michael J. Weber, Jr.,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

*Elaine M. Scanlon,*in opposition.

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 342, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in holding that the trial .court abused its discretion by excluding the testimony of the defendant’s mother as to whether her ‘other children suffer from any physical ailments, any medical problems’ prior to any evidence that the defendant suffered from a genetic mental disorder?”
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10430

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Pedro Tatum, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-365-4

Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Tatum has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Tatum has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 1, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10430 Document: 00515882173 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2021
No. 20-10430

2

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-10430 Document: 00515882173 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2021
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Vegetable Crops Research: Madison, WI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ScientistsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Madison, Wisconsin Vegetable Crops Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- Publications in ARIS

Yiqun  Weng
                     

                     Research Geneticist (Plants)


                     Phone: (608) 262-0028
                     
                     

                     Fax: (608) 262-4743
                     

                     UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN                           
                     1575 LINDEN DR                                    
                     

                     MADISON                       , WI 53706


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov