alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION

I, James N. Ryan, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-Q of PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 7, 2003                
 /s/ James N. Ryan                                                   

James N. Ryan

Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation 

Managing General Partner of PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.01



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-49494) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the 1995 Equity
Incentive Plan, the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan,
and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 16, 2001,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Transmeta Corporation
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 1, 2001
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, the President of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the registrant), certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|      |                 |                           | 
|----- | --------------- | ------------------------- | 
|Date: | August 14, 2009 | /s/ Philip K. Polkinghorn
|      | Name:           | Philip K. Polkinghorn    
|      | Title:          | President
# L_2013300EN.01000601.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 300/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 300/6

---

DECISION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

of 5 December 2011

on the admission of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

The full text of this Decision was published in OJ L 112 of 24 April 2012, page 6.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements included in the Company's quarterly report on form 10-q for the three
months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statement.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,897
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,193
<INVENTORY>                                      7,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,249
<PP&E>                                         166,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                (46,581)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,967
<BONDS>                                        131,574
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           31,868
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,819)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,340
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,783
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,507)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (891)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,398)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (548.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
PEOPLES-SIDNEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peoples-Sidney  Financial Corporation
(the  "Corporation")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2002, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  of  this
Certification (the "Report"),  I, Debra A. Geuy, the Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Corporation,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Corporation.



                            /s/ Debra A. Geuy
                            ------------------------------
                            Debra A. Geuy, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

                            Date: February 12, 2003
#### BENJAMIN APPLESTEIN, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN AND INTERSTATE CONTAINER CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. MARTHA U. BEUERLEIN, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORP., *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Argued June 6, 1960

Decided June 13, 1960.

*Mr. Daniel O. Easen*argued the cause for the appellants *(Messrs. Easen, Schnitzer & Easen,*attorneys; *Mr. Morris M. Schnitzer,*of counsel).

*Mr. David Friedenberg*argued the cause for the respondents Francis X. Conway, *et al. (Mr. Maurice O. Brigadier,*attorney).

*Mr. Philip J. Albert*argued the cause for the respondent Benjamin Applestein *(Messrs. Levy, Levy & Albert,*attorneys) .

*Mr. Isadore Olauberman*argued the case for the respondent United Board & Carton Corporation *(Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss,*on the brief).

*Mr. Raymond Ghasan*argued the cause for the respondents Martha U. Beuerlein, *et al. (Messrs. Levy, Lenicen & Margulies,*attorneys; *Mr. Seymour Margulies,*of counsel).

*73Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the court below.

*For affirmance*— Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino--7.

*For reversal*— None.
#### RAY, Appellant, v. HEARD et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 2, 1907.)

Action by Lottie C. Ray against Ralph E. Heard and others, as executors.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Joseph J. Gelhaus et al., Appellants, v Pearl River School District, Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Coppola, J.), dated February 3, 1984, which is in favor of the defendant, upon a jury verdict.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The infant plaintiff, an eighth-grade student, was injured on March 16, 1981 when he fell from the high rings during a physical education class at defendant’s Pearl River Middle School. Thereafter, he and his father commenced this action, contending, *inter alia,*that defendant was negligent in failing to provide proper supervision and proper equipment. Following a trial, the jury returned a verdict in defendant’s favor, and plaintiffs now appeal on the principal ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. We affirm.

For a court to conclude as a matter of law that a jury verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence, it is necessary to find that “there is simply no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational men to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence at trial” *(Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 499). At bar, there was trial testimony that at the time of the accident the infant plaintiff was attempting to execute a maneuver on the high rings for the first time; that the students were instructed to advise a teacher before attempting to do a new maneuver; and that the infant plaintiff had not done so. There was also testimony that four teachers and about 80 students were present in the gymnasium at the time; that the students, who received instructions on various techniques as part of the gymnastic course, were used as “spotters” to break a potential fall and prevent the head or back from getting hit; and that the infant plaintiff’s spotter “did a super job of spotting him”. Finally, there was testimony that the system of “spotters” was an accepted practice and that the padding under the rings was appropriate. In view of this evidence, and based upon the record as a whole, we simply cannot say that there was “no valid line of reasoning * * * which could possibly lead rational men to the conclusion reached by the jury” that defendant was not negligent. Hence, the jury’s verdict should not be disturbed *(see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, supra,*p 499; *see also, Lincoln v Austic,*60 AD2d 487).

*150We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of David B. Guilfoose, Petitioner, v New York State Agriculture Experiment Station, Respondent.

Mahoney, P. J.

Proceeding initiated in this court pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated October 19, 1983, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice based on disability.

Petitioner filed a complaint with the State Division of Human Rights charging that he had been terminated as a groundskeeper for respondent, a division of Cornell University’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, because he suffered a physical disability. After investigation and following a review of the related evidence, the Division determined that there was not probable cause to believe that respondent engaged in a discriminatory practice.

The Division’s investigation pursuant to Executive Law § 297 (2) revealed that, on August 5,1982, petitioner’s activities were *431medically restricted so that his ability to perform the full range of duties required by his job was impaired. Petitioner did not work for the next seven months. On March 8,1983, respondent notified petitioner that he had used nearly all of his sick leave, disability leave and vacation time, and that his employment would be terminated when his leave ran out in order to fill the position with an active employee. On March 28, 1983, petitioner’s doctor lifted the medical restrictions. Five days later, petitioner was again hospitalized. Petitioner was terminated on April 14, 1983. Several months later, when petitioner was medically advised that he could return to work, he was informed by respondent that his position had been eliminated due to budgetary restraints. Based on the investigation, the Division dismissed petitioner’s complaint. Petitioner commenced this proceeding to review the Division’s determination.

Since there clearly exists a rational basis for the Division’s determination, the petition must be dismissed. The investigation included a field visit, conferences, interviews and the submission of numerous documents. Petitioner was given a full opportunity to rebut respondent’s evidence. Indeed petitioner was still suffering from a medical disability when his position was eliminated for budgetary purposes. Accordingly, we cannot conclude that the Division acted in either a capricious or arbitrary manner *(see, Matter of Siegel v State Div. of Human Rights,*105 AD2d 1051).

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Global Change and Photosynthesis Research: Urbana, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Urbana, Illinois Global Change and Photosynthesis Research People & Locations





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People
- Contact Information
- ARS News Articles
- Research Projects
- Publications

Elizabeth A Ainsworth

(Lisa)
                     

                     Research Molecular Biologist


                     Phone: (217) 265-9887
                     
                     

                     Fax: (217) 244-4419
                     Room 147 ERML

                     1201 WEST GREGORY                                 
                     
                     

                     URBANA                        , IL 61801


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2017161EN.01003702.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/37

---

Action brought on 27 March 2017 — CeramTec v EUIPO — C5 Medical Werks (Representation of a hip ball)

(Case T-194/17)

(2017/C 161/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CeramTec (Plochingen, Germany) (represented by: A. Renck and E. Nicolás Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: C5 Medical Werks (Grand Junction, Colorado, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative colour mark in pink (Representation of a hip ball) — EU trade mark No 10 214 112

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2017 in Case R 928/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, or, if C5 Medical Werks joins, by the intervener. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, or, if C5 Medical Werks joins, by the intervener.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 59 and 83 of Regulation No. 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 59 and 83 of Regulation No. 207/2009.

---