alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    257,859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               293,112
<PP&E>                                         125,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 426,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,545
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,079)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   426,541
<SALES>                                        487,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               492,151
<CGS>                                          315,430
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  505,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,576)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,889
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,687)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.61)


</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE AWORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN



### Honorable HenryM.wade CountyAttorney Eioakwall county 

### Rookwall, Texas Dearsir:

lar valuation, five 

### (5) aents valuation. 

### 100.00) Dollar
Civil statutes ot 

### Texas,
sahool dlstriot votes a ard of trustee& 

### shall lly levy andeauneto be assesss uponthe taxable property in e distrlat for the maintenaaae 

### trse sohools of the said district mtax:\asthe qualified toters o? auth&!lzed at the sleotlon held Zr that purpose1 or It no speaifie rats has been

### voted, said board shall levy such a rate eaahyear within. that limit as it maydeemjudioious. where amaintenanoe tax has beenvoted, no eleatlon to revoke, modify or inareaae theHonorable Henry h. Wade, Page 2

sameshall be held until two years from the date of the election authorizing such maintenance tax. Anelection to revoke, modify ,or increase such maintenance tax,,when permissible, maybe obtained and held substantially as herein provided for an election to authorize suah tax; provided, however, that no ohange or moditioation in such maintenance tax shall ever arfect any bond tax authorized by suoh district

.” The right of

’ the qualified voters of an independent school distriat to revoke, modify or inarease the sohool maintenanas tax.has been repeatedly recognized by our State courts. In Yorktown Independent Sohool District v. Asslerbach, etal, C.ommisalonof Appeals, 12 S. W. (2d) 130, the court said:

*Themethod provided by law for authorizing taxes for maintenanoe of publia free sahools and the like is by a reference to the qualified property taxpay$ng voters of the distriot without whioh any attempt to levy such taxes would be futife:‘! .We, therefore, answer your question in the affirmative. Yours very truly ATTORNEY

GERERAL

OFTEXAS By (signed) Glenn R. Lewis

Glenn R. Lewis Assistant 

### Hk:RS APPROVED:



### ,NOV. 14, 1939 By (Signed) Hirschie Johnson Hirschie Johnson (Signed) W. F. LEoore FIRSTASSISTANT ATTOmY GENERAL APPROVED

: OPINIONCOMMITTEE SyB. w. B., Chairman
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Mutch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that except for
the failure to timely file the report, the Quarterly Report of Peregrine Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Systems, Inc.

Date:
February 15, 2005

| |  | /s/JOHN MUTCHJohn Mutch
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Peregrine Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Wireless Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Hathaway, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, that I believe that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(3)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:    November 19, 2002



WORLD WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.By:

/s/    Robert W. HathawayRobert W. Hathaway Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Bluefly,   Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Melissa Payner-Gregor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.  The information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Melissa Payner-Gregor
-------------------------
Melissa Payner-Gregor
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2006
#### THOMPSON BONNEY CO., Respondent, v. I. S. VAN LOAN CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 18, 1907.)

Action by the Thompson Bonney Company against the I. S. Van Loan Company.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.2

Eastern Division

Carmen Feliciano, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:03−cv−01768

Honorable James B. Zagel

County of Cook, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, November 8, 2011:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable James B. Zagel:Defendant's motion for

judgment not withstanding the verdict [283] or alternatively, motion for a new trial is

denied. The parties are instructed to follow the court's procedure for fee petitions.Mailed

notice(drw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:03-cv-01768 Document #: 302 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:7392
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002
(18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted), James W. Benson, Chief Executive Officer
of  SpaceDev,  Inc.  (the  "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

     The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and the information
contained  in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

     IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of this
15th  day  of  May  2003.




  By:     /s/  James W. Benson
          ---------------------
     James  W.  Benson
     CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER
#### Pendergrass *v.*Duke; *et vice versa.*

February 25, 1915.

Motion for new trial. Before Judge Jones. Jackson superior court. November 8, 1913.

*P. Cooley*and *Bay <& Bay,*for Pendergrass.

*John J. & Boy M. Strickland, T. J. Shackelford,*and *J. A. B. Mahaffey,*contra.

Per Curiam.

During the first week of Jackson superior court the case of Duke against Pendergrass, the same being an equitable petition for specific' performance, was tried. While the jury was out considering the case, it having been submitted to them under the instructions of the court, the court took a recess until the following Monday morning, counsel having consented that the jury might return a sealed verdict. On the following Monday morning the judge from another circuit came on the bench to preside during the second week; and the jury having returned a sealed verdict, the same was received and published, and the losing party, the plaintiff in error in the present case, prepared a motion for a new trial, a rule nisi, and an order setting the case down for a hearing and allowing time for the completion of the motion and a brief of the evidence. This motion and rule nisi and the other orders that were prepared were presented to the judge presiding the second week, for his signature. He declined to sign, on the ground that he had not tried the case, being of the opinion that the motion should be presented to the judge who tried the case; and the motion was accordingly presented by counsel to that judge. He granted the order and set the case down for a hearing at chambers. When it came on for hearing, a motion to dismiss the motion for a new trial was made by the respondent in the motion. The court rendered judgment refusing to dismiss the motion, and upon review this court reversed the judgment overruling the motion to dismiss the motion for a new trial, holding that the judge who granted the rule nisi and the other orders referred to was without jurisdiction to entertain the motion for a new trial. Subsequently, the time for making a motion for a new trial having expired, the plaintiff in error here made an extraordinary motion for a new trial, based upon the grounds stated above, and upon the grounds of the former motion for a new trial. When the extraordinary motion came on for a hearing the judge having jurisdiction of the case overruled the motion. *Held:*

1. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial upon this extraordinary motion.

2. The mistake of the judge to whom the motion made in term time was presented, as to his want of jurisdiction to entertain the motion, is not ground for the grant of a new trial upon extraordinary motion.

3. The foregoing rulings necessarily resulting in an affirmance of the judgment of the court below on a main bill of exceptions, the cross-bill of exceptions will be dismissed.

*Judgment affirmed on the main hill of exceptions. Gross-hill dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
#### Michael Tagliaferro, Respondent, v Charlene Tagliaferro et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, defendants Charlene Tagliaferro and Local Book Publishers, Incorporated, appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), entered January 7, 1985, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s amended complaint as against them.

Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Although appellants raise numerous issues on this appeal, their main contention is that Special Term erred in denying their motion for summary judgment because the amended complaint was based upon an illegal and unenforceable con*571tract between plaintiff and appellant Local Book Publishers, Incorporated. They maintain that while the subject contract appears on its face to be an "employment agreement”, it was in fact a device to evade Federal and State income tax. However, it is undisputed that appellants failed to assert the affirmative defense of illegality in both their answers to the original complaint and to the amended complaint. Moreover, the record reveals that the appellants failed to raise this defense in two previous motions for summary judgment which were granted in part.

Contrary to appellants’ assertions, the alleged illegality of the contract is not apparent from the allegations in the amended complaint *(cf. Herbert F. Darling, Inc. v City of Niagara Falls,*69 AD2d 989). Nor may it be concluded, based upon the evidence in the record, that appellants were not required to plead illegality as an affirmative defense because plaintiff was aware that the contract was illegal and, therefore, cannot claim surprise or prejudice (CPLR 3018 [b]; *cf. Carlson v Travelers Ins. Co.,*35 AD2d 351).

In view of these circumstances, we agree with Special Term that the appellants failed to establish their defense "sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment in [their] favor” (CPLR 3212 [b]; *Krupp v Aetna Life & Cas. Co.,*103 AD2d 252, 261). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 363 

Congratulating the Pittsburg State University Gorillas football team for 

winning the 2011 NCAA Division II Football Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2012 

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Pittsburg State University Gorillas football team for winning the 2011 NCAA Division II Football Championship. 

Whereas the Pittsburg State University Gorillas football team 

defeated the Wayne State University Warriors by a score 

of 35 to 21 to win the 2011 NCAA Division II Football 

Championship in Florence, Alabama on December 17, 

2011; 

Whereas Pittsburg State University has more all-time wins 

than any other NCAA Division II football program and 

this championship victory, the 4th in the history of the 

university, continues a long tradition of success; 

Whereas the Pittsburg State University coaching staff, led by 

second-year Head Coach Tim Beck, the 2011 Liberty 

Mutual Coach of the Year Award winner for Division II, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 363 ATS 

guided the Gorillas to a final regular season record of 13 

wins and 1 loss; 

Whereas the Gorillas benefitted from strong leadership in the 

championship game, including senior quarterback and 

Pittsburg, Kansas native Zac Dickey, who passed for 190 

yards and rushed for 68 yards; and 

Whereas the students, staff, alumni, and friends of Pittsburg 

State University, along with the city of Pittsburg, Kansas, deserve much credit for supporting the Gorillas football team: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the Pittsburg State University 

3 Gorillas football team for winning the 2011 NCAA 

4 Division II Football Championship; and 

5 (2) recognizes the achievements of all the play6 ers, coaches, and support staff of the Pittsburg 

7 State University Gorillas football team. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Great Basin Rangelands Research: Reno, NV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Newsletter
                        Volume 1
                                    Volume 2Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Reno, Nevada Great Basin Rangelands Research Rangeland Rehabilitation Lab







GBRRUheadline bar        (click above for technician info) Daniel Harmon


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Case: 1:03-cv-06472 Document #: 3 Filed: 09/12/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:46
#### In the Matter of Clifford Howard, Respondent, v Walter Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants.

—Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner waived his right to challenge respondents’ decision by failing to attend the disciplinary hearing held November 23, 1984 at the Ossining Correctional Facility *(Matter of Payne v Smith,*97 AD2d 960; *see also, Matter of Morrison v Coughlin,*101 AD2d 943, 944, *lv denied*63 NY2d 605; *People ex rel. Morgan v La Vallee,*49 AD2d 652, *lv denied*37 NY2d 710). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. —art 78.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 144 (Friday, July 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 41075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institue of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Advisory 
Council for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.
    The meeting will be open to the public by videocast as indicated 
below.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council for Biomedical 
Imaging and Bioengineering NACBIB, September 2021.
    Date: September 14, 2021.
    Open: 12:00 p.m. to 3:15 p.m.
    Agenda: Report from the Institute Director and other Institute 
Staff.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Closed: 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: David T. George, Ph.D., Associate Director, 
Office of Research Administration, National Institute of Biomedical 
Imaging and Bioengineering, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 920, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e191b110c191b1a3e131f17125010171650191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e393b312c393b3a1e333f37327030373670393128">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: https://www.nibib.nih.gov/about-nibib/advisory-council, where 
an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be 
posted when available.

    Dated: July 26, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-16262 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of Gerald Gaines, Respondent, v Walter Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants.

—Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We reverse for the reason stated in *Matter of Elliott v Kelly*(117 AD2d 1002). We add only that the remaining issues petitioner raises here were not raised before Special Term and, therefore, are not properly before this court *(see, Lyons v Quandt,*91 AD2d 709, 710; *Matter of Van Wormer v Leversee,*87 AD2d 942, 943; *Peasley v Reid,*57 AD2d 998, 999; *Matter of Chauvel v Nyquist,*55 AD2d 76, 79, *affd*43 NY2d 48). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.—art 78.) Present —Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.