alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralph Viruet, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), rendered December 15, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.01
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-49494)pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1997 EquityIncentive Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56654) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements, the 2000Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (FormS-8 Nos. 333-77052, 333-104100, and 333-188048) pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan andthe 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-89220)pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Transmeta Corporation of our report datedMarch 25, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Transmeta Corporationincluded in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
#### In the Matter of Donna M. Riendeau, Respondent, v Michael P. Riendeau, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 215]—

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffmann, J.), dated April 18, 2011, as denied his objection to so much of an order of the same court (Fields, S.M.), dated September 17, 2010, as, after a hearing, denied his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

*892Ordered that the order dated April 18, 2011, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“ ‘A parent seeking downward modification of a child support obligation has the burden of establishing a substantial and unanticipated change in circumstances’ ” *(Basile v Wiggs,*82 AD3d 921, 921 [2011], quoting *Matter of Mera v Rodriguez,*74 AD3d 974, 974 [2010]; *see Matter of Kalarickal v Kalarickal,*89 AD3d 846, 847 [2011]; *Matter of Muselevichus v Muselevichus, 40*AD3d 997, 998 [2007]). A parent’s loss of employment may constitute a substantial and unanticipated change in circumstances justifying a downward modification of child support where the termination occurred through no fault of the parent and the parent has diligently sought re-employment commensurate with his or her earning capacity (see *Matter of Bruckstein v Bruckstein,*78 AD3d 695, 696 [2010]; *Matter of Gedacht v Agulnek,*67 AD3d 1013 [2009]; *Matter of Muselevichus v Muselevichus,*40 AD3d at 998). Here, the Family Court properly determined that the father failed to meet his burden of demonstrating a substantial and unanticipated change in circumstances warranting a downward modification of his child support obligation (see *Matter of Kalarickal v Kalarickal,*89 AD3d at 847). The father caused his own loss of employment by ¿ailing to meet his child support obligation, which resulted in nis incarceration for a period of six months. In addition, the father’s unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations that he diligently sought employment commensurate with his qualifications and experience were insufficient to meet his burden *(see Matter of Peterson v Peterson,*75 AD3d 512, 513 [2010]; *Matter of Gedacht v Agulnek,*67 AD3d 1013 [2009]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.R, Hall, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15637]



[[Page 38736]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4601-DR: Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]


Tennessee; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4601-DR), dated May 8, 2021, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued June 22, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of May 8, 2021.

    Marion County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-15637 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Carol R. Wellner, Appellant, v Michael H. Wellner, Respondent.

In an action to recover arrears in child support payments, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered July 23, 1984, as granted the defendant husband’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s combined notice for discovery and inspection and request for interrogatories to the extent of vacating plaintiff’s interrogatories designated 10 to 15 inclusive and 19 and 20.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon review of the record, Special Term acted within the scope of its discretion *(see, Petraglia v Laiacona,*86 AD2d 747; CPLR 3103 [a]). The subject interrogatories, in their present form, lack specificity and are irrelevant to the issues in the instant action *(Metzger v Brockman,*92 AD2d 499, 500; *Andrew F. Capoccia, P.C. v Spiro,*88 AD2d 1100, 1101-1102). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (452)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,334
<PP&E>                                          10,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,005)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,343
<SALES>                                         23,218
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,218
<CGS>                                            4,004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   232
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  23
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.75)
        


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 116A/26 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 116A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5026 May 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 116A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5026 May 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 116A/01 | NOTICE TO READERS | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2007/C 116A/01

NOTICE TO READERS

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2007/C 116A/02 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/25/05 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of European public Administration/Human resources | 3 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2007/C 116A/02

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/25/05 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of European public Administration/Human resources

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Martinez, Appellant.

— Appeals by defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), each rendered August 1, 1984, convicting him under indictment No. 2958/83 of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, under indictment No. 7400/83 of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and under indictment No. 3306/83 of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgment as to indictment No. 2958/83 modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. As so modified, judgment under indictment No. 2958/83 affirmed.

Judgments under indictments Nos. 7400/83 and 3306/83 affirmed.

Defendant entered into a plea bargain agreement whereby he agreed to plead guilty to certain crimes under three separate indictments (indictments Nos. 2958/83, 7400/83 and 3306/83) and in satisfaction of a pending Criminal Court case. It is clear from the plea minutes that it was agreed that under indictment No. 2958/83 — the top count of which was criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, an A-I felony — defendant would plead guilty to an A-II felony. Further, in accordance with that agreement, the court promised to sentence defendant to a term of six years to life imprisonment, such sentence being the minimum permissible sentence upon a conviction of an A-II felony as a second felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [4] [a]). In entering his plea under indictment No. 2958/83, however, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree *(see,*Penal Law § 220.21). Thereafter, at sentencing, the court imposed a sentence of six years to life upon such conviction in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement.

We now modify that conviction, in the interest of justice and upon the request of the People, by reducing it to one of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, an A-II felony *(see,*Penal Law § 220.18), in order to effectuate the clear purpose and intent of the plea agreement. Further, since the sentence imposed upon defendant’s conviction under indictment No. 2958/83 of six years to life was the *744sentence promised and is the minimum permissible sentence which could be imposed upon defendant’s conviction, as a second felony offender, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, there is no purpose to be served by remitting the matter for resentencing. Accordingly, we affirm the sentence.

We have examined the issues raised by defendant in his brief and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
exv10w6









    EXHIBIT 10.6



 




    ARRANGEMENTS WITH
    NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS



 



    On September 9, 2009, the Board of Directors of ABM
    Industries Incorporated (the “Registrant”) approved
    certain changes to cash and equity compensation of non-employee
    directors, beginning November 1, 2009. Non-employee
    directors will receive: an annual cash retainer of $70,000; an
    annual equity grant of $80,000 in restricted stock units, to be
    given at the Company’s annual shareholders meeting, with
    the value calculated by dividing $80,000 by the closing price of
    ABM common stock on the date of the grant; fees for Committee
    meetings (telephonic or otherwise) in the amount of $2,000 for
    each Audit Committee meeting, $1,500 for each Governance
    Committee meeting, $1,500 for each Compensation Committee
    meeting, and $1,500 for each Executive Committee meeting. The
    Board also approved annual retainers to the Chairman of the
    Board and the Chairs of the respective Committees as follows:
    Chairman of the Board $40,000; Chairman of the Audit Committee
    $15,000; Chairman of the Governance Committee $5,000; Chairman
    of the Compensation Committee $7,500; and Chairman of the
    Executive Committee $5,000. Fees for attendance at Board
    meetings were eliminated. In fiscal year 2009, the Board also
    approved additional payments to non-employee directors who, in
    instances approved by the Chairman of the Board, invest
    significant time above and beyond the requirements of Board or
    Committee service, by virtue of serving on an ad hoc committee
    or otherwise, in an amount equal to $2,000 per day for such
    service.



 



    On September 9, 2009 the Board of Directors approved the
    participation of non-employee directors in the Registrant’s
    health benefit plans, with the full cost of any such
    participation to be paid by the individual director electing to
    so participate.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










To the knowledge of each of the undersigned, this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. for the applicable reporting period.










Date:  March 24, 2010                                                                           By:      /s/  James A. Luksch


James A. Luksch, Chief Executive Officer





By:     /s/  Eric Skolnik


Eric Skolnik, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                                      15,579,897 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,452,889 
<PP&E>                                       5,293,975 
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,385,114 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,428,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,205,635
<BONDS>                                      3,343,766 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,882 
<COMMON>                                         3,317 
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,953,405  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,428,074 
<SALES>                                              0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,431,744 
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,116,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,192,842  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (158,987) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,718,191)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,718,191)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,718,191)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.25) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael N. Murdock, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL N. MURDOCK                                              
|Michael N. Murdock Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 8, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### DORR v. LAMBERT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by James F. Dorr against j John W. Lambert.

No opinion. Motion to dis-l miss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                       312
<INVENTORY>                                     17,622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,578
<PP&E>                                          79,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,051
<BONDS>                                         52,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,102
<SALES>                                         46,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,829
<CGS>                                           38,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 27,937
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2019280EN.01004701.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/47

---

Action brought on 28 June 2019 — Fantuzzi v Parliament

(Case T-403/19)

(2019/C 280/65)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Giulio Fantuzzi (Correggio, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;

| — | order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.

---