alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 304 

Supporting ‘‘Lights On Afterschool’’, a national celebration of afterschool 

programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 20), 2011 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. 

CASEY, and Ms. STABENOW) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting ‘‘Lights On Afterschool’’, a national celebration 

of afterschool programs. 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs provide safe, challenging, engaging, and fun learning experiences that help 

children and youth develop social, emotional, physical, 

cultural, and academic skills; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs support working 

families by ensuring that the children in those families 

are safe and productive after the regular school day ends; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs build stronger 

communities by involving students, parents, business 

leaders, and adult volunteers in the lives of children in 

the United States, thereby promoting positive relationships among children, youth, families, and adults; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 304 ATS 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs engage families, 

schools, and diverse community partners in advancing the 

well-being of children in the United States; 

Whereas ‘‘Lights On Afterschool’’, a national celebration of 

afterschool programs held on October 20, 2011, highlights the critical importance of high-quality afterschool 

programs in the lives of children, their families, and their 

communities; 

Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States 

have parents who work outside the home and approximately 15,100,000 children in the United States have no 

place to go after school; and 

Whereas many afterschool programs across the United States 

are struggling to keep their doors open and their lights 

on: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and 

2 ideals of ‘‘Lights On Afterschool’’, a national celebration 

3 of afterschool programs. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 236 

Designating September 2011 as National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 

Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2011 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. NELSON of Florida) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2011 as National Spinal Cord Injury 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas the estimated 1,275,000 people in the United States 

who live with a spinal cord injury cost society billions of 

dollars in health care costs and lost wages; 

Whereas an estimated 100,000 of those individuals living 

with a spinal cord injury are veterans who suffered the 

spinal cord injury while serving as members of the 

United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries; 

Whereas motor vehicle crashes are the second leading cause 

of spinal cord and traumatic brain injuries; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 236 ATS 

Whereas 70 percent of all spinal cord injuries that occur in 

children under the age of 18 are a result of motor vehicle 

accidents; 

Whereas every 48 seconds a person will become paralyzed, 

underscoring the urgent need to develop new 

neuroprotection, pharmacological, and regeneration treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; and 

Whereas increased education and investment in research are 

key factors in improving outcomes for victims of spinal 

cord injuries, improving the quality of life of victims, and 

ultimately curing paralysis: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2011 as Spinal Cord 

3 Injury Awareness Month; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Spinal Cord 

5 Injury Awareness Month; 

6 (3) continues to support research to find better 

7 treatments, therapies, and a cure for paralysis; 

8 (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies 

9 that offer promise and hope to those persons living 

10 with paralysis; and 

11 (5) commends the dedication of local, regional, 

12 and national organizations, researchers, doctors, vol13 unteers, and people across the United States that 

14 are working to improve the quality of life of persons 

15 living with paralysis and their families. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Mali

                    On July 26, 2019, by Executive Order 13882, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in Mali.                

The situation in Mali, including repeated violations of ceasefire arrangements made pursuant to the 2015 Agreement on Peace and Reconciliation in Mali; the expansion of terrorist activities into southern and central Mali; the intensification of drug trafficking and trafficking in persons, human rights abuses, and hostage-taking; and the intensification of attacks against civilians, the Malian defense and security forces, the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA), and international security presences, continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on July 26, 2019, must continue in effect beyond July 26, 2021. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13882 with respect to the situation in Mali.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2021-15824

Billing code 3295-F1-P
January 29 , 2013



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RICHARD G. ORTEGA , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00768

- CV V.

CACH, LLC , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appe llee, CACH, LLC, signed August 23, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accorda nce with the court’ s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, CACH , LLC.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 31
                           ==========


   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

     I, Lawrence Siccia, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB of Crafty Admiral
Enterprises, Ltd.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of,
and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing  and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd., including
its subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect our ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have further advised our auditors that
there we are not aware of any material weaknesses in our internal controls;
and
b) that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved our
management or other employees who have a significant role in our internal
controls.

6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report
that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation.

                                       CRAFTY ADMIRAL ENTERPRISES, LTD.
                                       Registrant
Dated: April 14, 2005                  /s/ Lawrence Siccia
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       By: Lawrence Sicia, President, Chief
                                       Executive Officer, Treasurer, Chief
                                       Financial Officer, Principal
                                       Accounting Officer and Director
Exhibit 10.3

Confidential

LOGO

Interoffice Memorandum



|      |  |                                                            
|----- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|To:   |  | Personnel File                                             
|      | 
|From: |  | Elizabeth A. Whayland, SVP of Finance & Corporate Secretary
|      | 
|Date: |  | January 25, 2006                                           
|      | 
|Re:   |  | Amendment to Employment Agreement dated May 20, 2002       



---

I, Elizabeth A. Whayland, (the Executive) signed an Employment Agreement (the Agreement) with my employer, CuraGen Corporation (the Company), on or about May 20, 2002, and subsequently signed an
Addendum to the Agreement on October 31, 2003. Exhibit A, Item 1) of the original Agreement provides that the Executives initial base salary shall be subject to increases by the Board of Directors, which shall review the salary
periodically. Therefore, pursuant to the minutes of the January 25, 2006, Meeting of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, the Executives 2006 base salary will be adjusted to $211,000 per year, payable in bi-weekly
installments.

Unless explicitly changed in the Addendum dated October 31, 2003, all other terms of the original Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.



|                     
|---------------------
|Elizabeth A. Whayland
|                     
|Patrick J. Zenner
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40895

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PHAROAH STERLING GIBSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-27-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 12, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Pharoah Sterling Gibson has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Our independent review of the brief and record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          25,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,937)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,424
<PP&E>                                          41,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,423)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,316
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                     281,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,773
<SALES>                                        176,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,956
<CGS>                                           38,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  172,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,664
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,942)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.50

                   AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, effective as of July 1, 2000 is
by and between Radiologix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and
Mark L. Wagar ("Wagar").

         WHEREAS, the parties to this Amendment entered into that certain
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 20, 1998, which was amended pursuant to
that certain Amendment of Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1999
(collectively, the "Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and Wagar desire to enter into this Amendment in
order to reflect an increase in Wagar's base salary and to make certain other
amendments;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1. The Employment Agreement is hereby amended to delete the existing
Section 3.1 and to add the following as a new Section 3.1:

         "Section 3.1 SALARY. For the performance of Wagar's duties hereunder,
         the Company shall pay Wagar an annual salary of $425,000, payable (less
         required withholdings) no less frequently than every two weeks."

         2. For purposes of delivering notice to the Company, the address that
should be inserted into Section 6.8 should be as follows:

         "Radiologix, Inc.
          3600 Chase Tower, 2200 Ross Avenue
          Dallas, Texas 75201-2776."


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this
Amendment effective as of the date first written above.

                                            RADIOLOGIX, INC.



                                            By:    /s/  PAUL M. JOLAS
                                               --------------------------------
                                                   Paul M. Jolas
                                                   General Counsel, Senior
                                                   Vice President and Secretary



<PAGE>   2

                                            WAGAR:



                                            By:    /s/  MARK L. WAGAR
                                               ----------------------
                                                   Mark L. Wagar
S. Con. Res. 35 Agreed to March 5, 2012

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT COMMITTEE. 

There is established a Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘joint committee’’) consisting of 3 Senators and 3 Members of the House 

of Representatives, to be appointed by the President of the Senate 

and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, respectively. 

The joint committee is authorized to make the necessary arrangements for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of the United States on January 21, 2013. 

SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE. 

The joint committee— 

(1) is authorized to utilize appropriate equipment and the 

services of appropriate personnel of departments and agencies 

of the Federal Government, under arrangements between the 

joint committee and the heads of those departments and agencies, in connection with the inaugural proceedings and ceremonies; and 

(2) may accept gifts and donations of goods and services 

to carry out its responsibilities. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1572

In Re: WILLIAM PENN REAVIS, SR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:07-cr-00075-JBF-JEB-1)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Penn Reavis, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Penn Reavis, Sr., petitions for a writ of 

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting 

on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp 2010) motion. He seeks an 

order from this court directing the district court to act. Our 

review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district 

court dismissed several claims and ordered the Government to 

respond. Accordingly, because the district court has recently 

taken action in Reavis’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as 

moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 934 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to make 

a technical correction relating to stainless steel single-piece exhaust gas 

manifolds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2011 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to make a technical correction relating to stainless 

steel single-piece exhaust gas manifolds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO STAIN4 LESS STEEL SINGLE-PIECE EXHAUST GAS 

5 MANIFOLDS. 

6 (a) STAINLESS STEEL SINGLE-PIECE EXHAUST GAS

7 MANIFOLDS.—Heading 9902.40.94 of the Harmonized 

8 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended in the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 934 IS

1 article description by striking ‘‘9902.01.50’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘8409.91.50’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

5 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn 

6 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

7 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY.— 

9 (A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sec10 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

11 1514) or any other provision of law and subject 

12 to subparagraph (B), the entry of a good de13 scribed in heading 9902.40.94 of the Har14 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States 

15 (as amended by this section)— 

16 (i) which was made on or after Janu17 ary 1, 2010, and before the 15th day after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act, and 

19 (ii) with respect to which there would 

20 have been no duty or a reduced duty (as 

21 the case may be) if the amendment made 

22 by this section applied to such entry, 

23 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though the 

24 entry had been made on the 15th day after the 

25 date of the enactment of this Act. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 934 IS

1 (B) REQUESTS.—A liquidation or reliqui2 dation may be made under subparagraph (A) 

3 with respect to an entry only if a request there4 for is filed with U.S. Customs and Border Pro5 tection not later than 180 days after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act that contains suffi7 cient information to enable U.S. Customs and 

8 Border Protection— 

9 (i) to locate the entry; or 

10 (ii) to reconstruct the entry if it can11 not be located. 

12 (C) PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS OWED.—Any 

13 amounts owed by the United States pursuant to 

14 the liquidation or reliquidation of an entry of a 

15 good under subparagraph (A) shall be paid, 

16 without interest, not later than 90 days after 

17 the date of the liquidation or reliquidation (as 

18 the case may be). 

19 (D) DEFINITION.—As used in this para20 graph, the term ‘‘entry’’ includes a withdrawal 

21 from warehouse for consumption. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### POWELL V. SCHIMPF.

*Assault and Battery.*

(Decided June 13, 1907.)

Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Samuel B. Browne,

W. C. Fitts, for appellant.

McAlpine & Bobinson, for appellee.

Dowdell, J.

Affirmed on authority of *Irby v.*Wilde, 150 Ala. 402.

Tyson, C. J., Anderson and McClellan, JJ., concur.