alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,869
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         2,231
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               4,170
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           804
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               0
<LOANS>                                       69,276
<ALLOWANCE>                                      351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                83,479
<DEPOSITS>                                    73,869
<SHORT-TERM>                                     623
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,320
<LONG-TERM>                                    4,502
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           4
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                83,479
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1,835
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 12
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  32
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1,879
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               754
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               861
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,018
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     24
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   88
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                      48
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  5.82
<LOANS-NON>                                        0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     959
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               1,504
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  793
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 340
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      7
<RECOVERIES>                                       1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                351
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             351
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          351



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Caremark Rx, Inc. (formerly MedPartners, Inc.) and in the related
Prospectuses of our report dated February 10, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Caremark Rx, Inc. included in
this annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000:

         Form S-8 033-86806 pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan;
         Form S-8 333-11875 pertaining to MedPartners' Incentive Compensation
           Plan;
         Form S-8 333-11127 pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan;
         Form S-8 333-05703 pertaining to MedPartners' Employee Savings Plan;
         Form S-8 333-14159 pertaining to Caremarks' Employee Savings Plan;
         Form S-8 333-14163 pertaining to Caremarks' Non-Employee Director Stock
           Option Plan and Caremarks' Stock Purchase Plan;
         Form S-8 333-38835 pertaining to Medpartners' 1997 Long Term Incentive
           Compensation Plan;
         Form S-8 333-16863 pertaining to MedPartners' Employee Stock Purchase
           Plan;
         Form S-3 333-17339 pertaining to the resale of common stock by certain
           selling shareholders;
         Form S-8 333-30145 pertaining to the MedPartners' 1994 Non-Employee
           Director Stock Option Plan and 1994 Incentive Plan;
         Form S-8 333-42967 pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock
           Option Plan;
         Form S-8 333-50849 pertaining to MedPartners' 1997 Long Term Incentive
           Compensation Plan;
         Form S-3 333-53761 pertaining to the resale of common stock by certain
           selling shareholders;
         Form S-8 333-64371 pertaining to MedPartners' 1998 Employee Stock
           Option Plan;
         Form S-8 333-68709 pertaining to the Non-Qualified Stock Option
           Agreement Dated August 6, 1998 between MedPartners and Edwin M.
           Crawford; and
         Form S-8 333-68707 pertaining to MedPartners' 1998 New Employee Stock
           Option Plan.
         Form S-3 333-90583 pertaining to the offering of Preferred Securities
           by Caremark Rx Capital Trust I.

Birmingham, Alabama
March 20, 2001
#### SAMUEL S. SALITAN, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. FINN H. MAGNUS, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

October 17, 1960.

*Mr. Max L. Rosensiein*and *Mr. Harry A. Margolis*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Israel B. Greene*for the respondents.

Denied.
# Official Journal C 314A/23 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 314A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5823 September 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 314A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5823 September 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2015/C 314A/1 | Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/117 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2015/C 314A/1

Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/117

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 
  





 












 The Corporation shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement
of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.
Such requests shall be made to the Corporation’s Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. 
 KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A
SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, OR DESTROYED THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE. 

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out
in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

																	
	 TEN COM
	 	–	  	as tenants in common	  	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT	 	–	 	 	 	 	 	Custodian	  	 
	 TEN ENT
	 	–	  	as tenants by the entireties	  		 		 	 	(Cust)	 	 		  	(Minor)
	 JT TEN
	 	–	  	as joint tenants with right of	  		 		 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
		 		  	survivorship and not as tenants	  		 		 	 	Act	 	 	 
		 		  	in common	  		 		 				 	(State)	  	
	 COM PROP
	 	–	  	as community property	  	UNIF TRF MIN ACT	 	–	 	 	 	 	 	Custodian (until age)
		 		  		  		 		 	 	(Cust)	 	 		  	
		 		  		  		 		 	 	 	 	 	under Uniform Transfers
		 		  		  		 		 	 	(Minor)	 	 		  	
		 		  		  		 		 	 	to Minors Act	 	 	 	  	 
		 		  		  		 			 	(State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
                                         
                                         
                                         
  hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto 
  

					
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	  		  	
	     

    
	  		  	

  

			
	 
	
	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
	
	 
	
	 


			
		
	 	  	shares


			
		
	 of the capital stock represented by within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint
	  	


			
		
	 	  	attorney-in-fact


			
		
	 to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of the
substitution in the premises.
	  	


					
			
	 Dated
	  	 	  	

  

							
		  	X	 	 
		  	X	 	 
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:	  		 	NOTICE:	  	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.

  

					
	By	  	 	  	


					
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM),
PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. SIGNATURE GUARANTEES MUST NOT BE DATED.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research: Aberdeen, ID
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Aberdeen, Idaho Small Grains and Potato Germplasm Research Docs





- Aberdeen U of I R&E Center
- U of I Hagerman Fish Culture Station
- University of Idaho- Moscow
- Annual Report for 2002 for WCC-27 - Potato Variety Development
- Description and Objectives of the WCC-27 Project:  Potato Variety Development
- Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center (DBNRRC)
- GRIN



Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
_____________

No. 95-1975WM

_____________

Joshua Building Trust; *

*

Appellant, *

*

Joe R. Brooks, Trustee, *

*

Plaintiff, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Kimberly Clementi, in her * [UNPUBLISHED]

capacity as Revenue Officer; *

Internal Revenue Service, an *

agency promulgated by law, *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

Submitted: March 7, 1996

 Filed: March 12, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Building Trust (JBT) appeals the district court's order

dismissing its complaint without prejudice. We affirm.

Joe R. Brooks, JBT's trustee, filed a complaint alleging the Internal

Revenue Service (IRS) and an IRS employee had violated the trust's

constitutional rights. The district court dismissed the complaint without

prejudice because the trust was not represented by a licensed member of the

bar.

A non-lawyer trustee may not represent a trust pro se in federal

court. Knoefler v. United Bank of Bismarck, 20 F.3d 347,
-2-

348 (8th Cir. 1994); see also C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818

F.2d 696, 697-98 (9th Cir. 1987). The government's motion to dismiss

adequately apprised Brooks that the case could be dismissed unless JBT was

represented by licensed counsel. JBT's argument that the district court

was precluded from dismissing the case before a scheduled settlement

conference is without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daryl Griffith, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (De Lury, J.), rendered November 22, 1982, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Feldman, J.), of defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

On this record, the findings of the hearing court with respect to probable cause for defendant’s arrest and the lawfulness of the search incident thereto must be sustained *(see, e.g., People v Hall,*105 AD2d 711; *People v Armstead,*98 AD2d 726).

Defendant’s challenge to his plea has not been preserved by motion to withdraw that plea *(see,*CPL 220.60 [3]) or motion to vacate the judgment *(see,*CPL 440.10; *People v Hoke,*62 NY2d 1022; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636), and nothing in this record persuades us that the issue should be reviewed in the interest of justice. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Fiber, JJ., concur.
#### PRESSLEY V. McCORMACK, ET AL.

*Equity.*

(Decided Nov. 19, 1907.)

Appeal from St. Clair Chancery Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Whiteside.

*666James A. Embry, for appellant.

Bilbro, Inzer & Stephens, for appellee. •

Affirmed.

Opinion by

Tyson, C. J.

Haralson, Simpson and Denson, JJ., concur.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 291 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival of Diwali. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 12, 2011 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. WARNER) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the 

festival of Diwali. 

Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian 

Americans and South Asian Americans, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, and Jains throughout India, the 

United States, and the world; 

Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants 

light small oil lamps, place the lamps around the home, 

and pray for health, knowledge, peace, wealth, and prosperity in the new year; 

Whereas the lights symbolize the light of knowledge within 

the individual that overwhelms the darkness of ignorance, 

empowering each celebrant to do good deeds and show 

compassion to others; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 291 IS 

Whereas Diwali falls on the last day of the last month in the 

lunar calendar and is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving 

for the homecoming of the Lord Rama and worship of 

Lord Ganesha, the remover of obstacles and bestower of 

blessings, at the beginning of the new year for many Hindus; 

Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is celebrated as Bandhi Chhor 

Diwas (The Celebration of Freedom), in honor of the release from prison of the sixth guru, Guru Hargobind; and 

Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha, or liberation, by Mahavira, the last 

of the Tirthankaras (the great teachers of Jain dharma), 

at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the religious and historical sig3 nificance of the festival of Diwali; and 

4 (2) in observance of Diwali, the festival of 

5 lights, expresses its deepest respect for Indian Amer6 icans and South Asian Americans, as well as fellow 

7 countrymen and diaspora throughout the world on 

8 this significant occasion. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019213EN.01005501.xml

| 24.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/55

---

Action brought on 9 April 2019 — Wepa Hygieneprodukte and Others v Commission

(Case T-238/19)

(2019/C 213/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Wepa Hygieneprodukte GmbH (Arnsberg, Germany), Wepa Leuna GmbH (Leuna, Germany), Wepa Papierfabrik Sachsen GmbH (Arnsberg) (represented by: H. Janssen and A. Vallone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission, notified under document C(2018) 3166 (OJ 2019 L 14, p. 1), of 28 May 2018 on aid scheme SA.34045 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 of the Stromnetzentgeltverordnung (Regulation on electricity network charges); and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission, notified under document C(2018) 3166 (OJ 2019 L 14, p. 1), of 28 May 2018 on aid scheme SA.34045 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 of the Stromnetzentgeltverordnung (Regulation on electricity network charges); and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The application is based on one plea in law, arguing that the exemption from network usage charges is not aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.

In that regard, the applicants first claim that the exemption from network usage charges did not entail the use of State or State-granted resources. It is further claimed that the defendant erred when considering that the Paragraph 19 surcharge constitutes a ‘levy’ or ‘parafiscal levy’ imposed by the State on end-users within the meaning of the judgment of 17 July 2008, Essent Netwerk Noord and Others (C-206/06, EU:C:2008:413).

It is further submitted that the baseload consumers were not granted a selective advantage.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3
                                                                     -----------

                           ENTRUST TECHNOLOGIES INC.

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                   OF CHARTER


     Entrust Technologies Inc., a Maryland corporation, having its principal
office in this State in Baltimore, Maryland (hereinafter called the
"Corporation"), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and
Taxation of Maryland, that:

     FIRST:  The Charter of the Corporation, as amended and restated to date
(the "Charter"), is hereby further amended by deleting Article FIRST of the
Charter in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:

         "FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is:

     Entrust, Inc."

     SECOND:  A majority of the entire board of directors of the Corporation, at
a meeting duly held on May 31, 2001, adopted a resolution approving the
foregoing amendment, which amendment is limited to a change expressly authorized
by Section 2-605 of the Maryland General Corporation Law to be made without
action by the stockholders of the Corporation.

                                     *****
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Entrust Technologies Inc. has caused these presents to
be signed in its name and on its behalf by its President and attested (or
witnessed) by its Secretary on this 4 day of June, 2001.

                                ENTRUST TECHNOLOGIES INC.


                                By:  /s/ F. William Conner
                                     -------------------------------
                                        F. William Conner, President

Attested:  (Witnessed:)


/s/ James D. Kendry
-------------------
James D. Kendry, Secretary

     THE UNDERSIGNED, President of Entrust Technologies Inc., who executed on
behalf of said Corporation the foregoing Articles of Amendment of Charter, of
which this certificate is made a part, hereby acknowledges, in the name and on
behalf of said Corporation, the foregoing Articles of Amendment of Charter to be
the corporate act of said Corporation and further certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge, information and belief, the matters and facts set forth therein
with respect to the approval thereof are true in all material respects, under
the penalties of perjury.

                                /s/ F. William Conner
                                ------------------------------------
                                F. William Conner