alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302



I, Jonathan M. Rothberg, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of CuraGen Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2004                  
|                                      
|/s/ Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.       
|Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.           
|Chief Executive Officer, President and
|Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: December 23, 2003 |  |  |  |                                         
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ F. William Conner                   
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | Name:         F. William Conner         
|                        |  |  |  | Title:           Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Earl Robinson, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 888]—

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered November 25, 2008, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress identification evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress identification evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials. The evidence at the suppression hearing warranted the Supreme Court’s inference that the police officers who initiated the pursuit of the defendant had reasonable suspicion to detain him based on the information that they had received minutes earlier from a radio transmission and the defendant’s location in a residential back yard several yards away from the crime scene *(see People v Gonzalez,*91 NY2d 909, 910 [1998]; *People v Coleman,*62 AD3d 810, 810-811 [2009]; *People v Sabeno,*223 AD2d 512, 512-513 [1996]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court also properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress three showup identifications. Although showups *907are inherently suggestive and thus generally disfavored *(see People v Johnson,*81 NY2d 828, 831 [1993]; *People v Riley,*70 NY2d 523, 529 [1987]), showups have been upheld where, as here, they are conducted in reasonably close temporal and physical proximity to the crime scene *(see People v Duuvon,*77 NY2d 541, 544 [1991]). In this instance, the showup identifications occurred at the residence where the crimes took place within minutes of their occurrence and were not unduly suggestive under the circumstances *(id.*at 544).

The defendant’s remaining contentions raised in his pro se supplemental brief regarding the prosecutor’s summation are unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Stewart,*89 AD3d 1044, 1045 [2011]; *People v West,*86 AD3d 583, 584 [2011]). In any event, those contentions, as well as his remaining contentions, either are without merit or do not warrant reversal. Rivera, J.E, Chambers, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40226-40227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11477]


Determination Regarding Foreign Assistance to the Central 
Government of Nauru

    Pursuant to section 7047(c)(1) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2021 (Div. K, Pub. 
L. 116-260) (FY 2021 SFOAA), section 7047(c)(1) of the FY 2019 SFOAA 
(Div. F, Pub. L. 116-6), and section 7047(c)(1) of the FY 2020 SFOAA 
(Div. G, Pub. L. 116-94), I hereby determine that the Government of 
Nauru has recognized the independence of, or has established diplomatic 
relations with, the Russian Federation occupied Georgian territories of 
Abkhazia and Tskhinvali Region/South Ossetia.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register and 
on the Department of State website and, along with the accompanying 
Memorandum of Justification, shall be reported to Congress.


[[Page 40227]]


    Dated. June 16, 2021.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-15984 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-62289) pertaining to the Sync Research, Inc. Amended and 
Restated 1991 Stock Plan, and the Sync Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 
1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan and related Prospectus and in the 
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-52947) pertaining to the Sync 
Research, Inc. 1996 Non-Executive Stock Option Plan and related Prospectus 
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12315) pertaining to the 
1994 Assumed TyLink Corporation Equity Incentive Plan and related Prospectus 
of our report dated January 25, 1999, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements and schedule of Sync Research, Inc. included in the 
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Orange County, California
March 25, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           54196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    78228
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1433
<INVENTORY>                                      85584
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                228006
<PP&E>                                           77348
<DEPRECIATION>                                   20568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  308288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            93769
<BONDS>                                         115633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       27556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    308288
<SALES>                                         123859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                124052
<CGS>                                           107301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   120263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1232
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (355)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (355)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.4
Schedule of 2005 Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers

With respect to compensation in 2005, the table below sets forth the salary
of each of the named executive officers, effective as of January 1, 2005.
The Board's Compensation Committee approved the salaries of Messrs. Woodford
and Prichard on November 16, 2004, and the salary of Mr. Fryman on December
22, 2004.  The Compensation Committee granted the options listed below on
January 2, 2005.  Also, on February 15, 2005, the Compensation Committee
approved targets for the Registrant's management incentive program for its
executive officers.  Based upon the Registrant's net income performance
relative to 2005 budget, Mr. Prichard may earn up to 40% of his annual salary
in bonus compensation.  Based upon the Registrant's net income performance
relative to 2005 budget, Mr. Fryman may earn up to 22.5% of his annual salary
in bonus compensation; based upon the his performance relative to individual
performance measures established by the President and CEO, Mr. Fryman may
earn up to an additional 7.5% of his annual salary in bonus compensation.
Based upon the his performance relative to individual performance measures
established by the President and CEO, Mr. Woodford may earn up to an
additional 30% of his annual salary in bonus compensation.

                                        2005 Salary    Stock Options
Buckner Woodford
 Chairman                                $ 80,000          1,000
Louis Prichard
 President and CEO                        175,000          4,000
Norman J. Fryman
 Vice President of Sales and Service      113,949            500
42
#### Sherry Pryor et al., Respondents, v Inger K. Witter, Individually and as Trustee of the Marital Election Trust I, et al., Appellants.

[946 NYS2d 573]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered May 24, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment against the corporate defendant William D. Witter, Inc. (Witter Inc.), and denied, sub silentio, Witter Inc.’s cross motion for an extension of time to answer the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the cross motion granted.

Personal jurisdiction was obtained over Witter Inc. by plaintiffs’ delivery of a copy of the summons and complaint to the office of the Secretary of State in accordance with Business *573Corporation Law § 306 (b) *(see Micarelli v Regal Apparel,*52 AD2d 524 [1976]). However, the record shows that Witter Inc. did not receive notice of the action from the Secretary of State, inasmuch as plaintiffs occupied Witter Inc.’s former corporate address (where a copy of the summons and complaint would have been sent by the Secretary of State) and plaintiffs never delivered to Witter Inc. such a notice even though plaintiffs, who had recently left Witter Inc.’s employ, undertook to collect and forward mail addressed to Witter Inc. to its agent. Under the circumstances, which indicated that Witter Inc. lacked notice of the summons in time to respond, and in light of Witter Inc.’s prompt application to remedy its default and its demonstration of a meritorious defense, Witter’s application for an extension of time to respond to the complaint should have been granted *(see Spearman v Afreet Corp.,*238 AD2d 194 [1997]; *Epstein v Abalene Pest Control Serv.,*98 AD2d 832 [1983]; CPLR 3012 [d]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
#### HERBERT B. WATERMAN, PETITIONER-PETITIONER, v. MORRIS WINOGRAD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

December 17, 1960.

*Messrs. Platof, Platof & Heftier*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Hollander & Leichter, Mr. Isadore Olauberman*and *Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss*for the respondent.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 1 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 1

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

 Mr. Vitter introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has served 6 terms as a Representative 
shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives. For 
purposes of this section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in 
the House of Representatives shall be included as 1 term in determining 
the number of terms that such person has served as a Representative if 
the person fills the vacancy for more than 1 year.
    ``Section 2. No person who has served 2 terms as a Senator shall be 
eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of 
this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy 
in the Senate shall be included as 1 term in determining the number of 
terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills the 
vacancy for more than 3 years.
    ``Section 3. No term beginning before the date of the ratification 
of this article shall be taken into account in determining eligibility 
for election or appointment under this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES ALBERT TRIMMER, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 343 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Syed Zaidi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 2, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation.





Date: June 14, 2010





By:

/s/ Syed ZaidiName:

SYED ZAIDITitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Jack Gregory, certify that:



(1)    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Premier Holding Corp. for the period ended September 30, 2009;





(2)     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





(4)   The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





(5) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: August13, 2010 | Jack Gregory
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
# Official Journal L 459/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 459 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6422 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 459

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6422 December 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Amendments to the Customs Convention on the International Transport of goods under cover of TIR carnets (TIR Convention 1975) –
  According to UN Depositary Notification CN.370.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.16 the following amendments to the TIR Convention enter into force on 4 February 2022 for all Contracting Parties | 1 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 1/2021 of the EPA Committee established under the stepping stone Economic Partnership Agreement between Ghana, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part of 29 July 2021 regarding the adoption of the Rules of Procedure of the EPA Committee [2021/2302] | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Amendments to the Customs Convention on the International Transport of goods under cover of TIR carnets (TIR Convention 1975) –
  According to UN Depositary Notification CN.370.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.16 the following amendments to the TIR Convention enter into force on 4 February 2022 for all Contracting Parties

According to UN Depositary Notification CN.370.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.16 the following amendments to the TIR Convention enter into force on 4 February 2022 for all Contracting Parties

1

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 1/2021 of the EPA Committee established under the stepping stone Economic Partnership Agreement between Ghana, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part of 29 July 2021 regarding the adoption of the Rules of Procedure of the EPA Committee [2021/2302]

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.