alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 41 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 41

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should reduce spending 
by the amount resulting from the recently announced earmark moratorium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2011

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska submitted the following resolution; which was 
                referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should reduce spending 
by the amount resulting from the recently announced earmark moratorium.

Whereas the debt of the United States exceeds $14,000,000,000,000;
Whereas it is important for Congress to use all tools at its disposal to address 
        the national debt crisis;
Whereas Congress will not earmark funds for projects requested by Members of 
        Congress; and
Whereas the earmark ban should be utilized to realize actual savings: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that Congress should 
reduce spending by the amount resulting from the recently announced 
earmark moratorium.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mark Reuschle et al., Appellants, v William Marquadt et al., Respondents.

. In anegligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated December 6, 1984, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to vacate or amend an unconditional order of preclusion of the same court, dated August 7, 1984.

Order and judgment reversed, as an exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied, and plaintiffs’ cross motion to vacate or amend the unconditional order of preclusion dated August 7, 1984 granted to the extent that the unconditional order of preclusion dated August 7, 1984 is vacated and the bill of particulars, concededly served upon defendants, shall be accepted by them, upon condition that plaintiffs’ attorney per*636sonally pay to defendants’ attorney the sum of $1,077, representing legal fees and other costs and disbursements incurred in obtaining a response to the demand for a bill of particulars, within 30 days after service upon plaintiffs’ attorney of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. If this condition is not complied with, order and judgment affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, plaintiffs’ request to vacate the unconditional order of preclusion should have been granted, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been denied, upon condition that defendants’ attorney pay an appropriate sanction. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11.2

           HOME HEALTH CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
         FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998

The following calculation is submitted in accordance with the Securities Act of
1934:

                                           1996     1996(1)    1997      1998
                                          ------    -------   ------   --------
                                                  (amounts in thousands, 
                                                  except per share data)
 
Net income (loss)                         $3,294    $2,133    $2,814   $(24,848)
Write-off of discount on preferred stock    (787)     (787)        -          -
Dividends on preferred stock                (117)     (117)       (6)         -
                                          ------    ------    ------   --------
Net income (loss) available to common
  stockholders                            $2,390    $1,229    $2,808   $(24,848)
                                          ======    ======    ======   ========
 
Weighted average number of maximum
  shares outstanding during year           6,535     6,535     8,549      9,316
Weighted average number of maximum
  shares subject to exercise under
  outstanding stock options and
  warrants, net of treasury shares
  assumed repurchased                        118       118       138          -
                                          ------    ------    ------   --------
Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding     6,653     6,653     8,687      9,316
                                          ======    ======    ======   ========
Net income (loss) per share               $ 0.36    $ 0.18    $ 0.32   $  (2.67)
                                          ======    ======    ======   ========

(1) Reflects net income and net income per share after extraordinary loss of
    $1,160 on early extinguishment of indebtedness.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Crops Pathology and Genetics Research: Davis, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Outreach Events
                        UC Davis Picnic Day
                                    Kinders go to College
                                    STEM Girls
                                    Future Scientist Program
                                    Agriculture Future of America
                                    Wallace-Carver Fellowship
                                    Young Scholars Program
                                    Annual Awards Banquet
                    About Us
                        About Us
                                    Our Mission
                                    Principal InvestigatorsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Davis, California Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Docs





- Kendra Baumgartner
- Gregory Browne
- Cai-Zhong Jiang
- Takao Kasuga
- Daniel Kluepfel
- Andrew McElrone
- Amisha Poret-Peterson
- Kerri Steenwerth
- Mysore Sudarshana
- Thomas Tai
- Steven Ostoja

UC Davis Picnic Day - Davis, CAheadline bar Picnic Day 2019 Picnic Day 2018 /ARSUserFiles/20320500/images/Outreach/picnic day 2018/23.jpg


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Agricultural Water Efficiency and Salinity Research Unit: Riverside, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    US Salinity Lab
                        FAQ about salinity
                                    Publications
                                    History
                                    Scientific ModelsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Riverside, California Agricultural Water Efficiency and Salinity Research Unit Docs Publications





- Home Page
- USSL Publications
- Special Publications
- Models
- Research Databases

Special Publicationsheadline bar Saline and Alkaline Soils USDA Handbook No. 60First published in 1954Reissued in 1969out of print - Web version onlyAlthough Handbook No. 60 went out of print, because of continued interest in the handbook, this historic document is reproduced here in electronic format for the interested reader.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, John G. Demeritt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










Date:  November
      4, 2008
            /s/ John G.
      Demeritt
              John
      G. Demeritt
              Chief
      Financial Officer
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 403-3 Filed: 09/04/08 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2246
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 403-3 Filed: 09/04/08 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2247
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 403-3 Filed: 09/04/08 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:2248
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 403-3 Filed: 09/04/08 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:2249
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 403-3 Filed: 09/04/08 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:2250
EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kathy  Bright,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Radix  Marine  (the  "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the
                  fiscal  quarter  ended  March 31,  2004 (the  "Report")  fully
                  complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                  and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: December 1, 2004

                                    /s/ Kathy Bright
                                    -----------------------
                                    Kathy Bright
                                    Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 110I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 110I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6225 April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 110I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6225 April 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2019/642 of 13 April 2019 amending Decision (EU) 2019/274 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2019/642 of 13 April 2019 amending Decision (EU) 2019/274 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the interim
financial statements of American ATM Corp. as at and for the year ended three
months ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        $249,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               279,036
<PP&E>                                         192,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                 171,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          384,630
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,909
<OTHER-SE>                                   (319,778)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (316,859)
<SALES>                                        104,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,387
<CGS>                                           64,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (36,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,113)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.01)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Barbara E. Bresnan, Appellant, v John J. Bresnan, Respondent.

—Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Kahn, J.), entered March 19, 1985 in Ulster County, which denied petitioner’s motion to vacate an order of the Family Court of Ulster County awarding custody of the parties’ minor children to respondent.

When the parties were divorced in May 1981, petitioner was awarded custody of their two children pursuant to an October 1979 separation agreement they had entered into. During the summer of 1981, respondent moved before the Family Court of Ulster County for an order transferring custody of the children to him. In August 1983, due to petitioner’s failure to appear at the hearing on this matter, Family Court awarded respondent custody of the children, terminated an existing order of support and ordered arrears owed by respondent to be held for payment to petitioner.

In May 1984, petitioner moved to vacate Family Court’s order, contending that she had an excusable default and a meritorious cause of action. The motion was made returnable before a Supreme Court Justice who was then entertaining petitioner’s related habeas corpus proceeding in Ulster County. It is uncontested that the Family Court Judge who issued the order was ill and the other Family Court Judge recused herself from the matter. Respondent challenged Supreme Court’s authority to hear the motion to vacate, claiming that it should only be heard by the court which rendered the order. Special Term denied petitioner’s motion.

*880In addition to claiming that she has a meritorious defense and an excusable default, petitioner contends on this appeal that Family Court’s order should be vacated since it terminated child support arrearages due and owing to her and that respondent now uses the order as a defense against present efforts to collect same. Initially, it is to be noted that although CPLR 5015 (a) states that relief from an order may only be sought from the court which rendered it, in the present case this was not possible. Since Supreme Court has concurrent jurisdiction with Family Court, it could properly entertain the motion under the circumstances of this case *(see, Kagen v Kagen,*21 NY2d 532, 537; *see also,*NY Const, art VI, § 7). As for petitioner’s contention that the Family Court order abrogated her right to arrearages, this is contradicted by the substance of said order. Since Special Term acted within its discretion, we see no reason to disturb its order denying petitioner’s motion to vacate the Family Court order.

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alrecka Eugene McDOUGALD, a/k/a Alricka McDougald, a/k/a Alrecka McDougald, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6527.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 2, 2011.

Alrecka Eugene McDougald, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco, Angela Hewlett Miller, Terri-Lei O’Malley, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alrecka Eugene McDougald seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McDougald has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *972materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1



BEA SYSTEMS, INC.



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the periodic report of BEA Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alfred S. Chuang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification
has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.



Date: December 9, 2005



/s/ Alfred S. ChuangAlfred S. ChuangChief Executive Officer




55