alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(February 19, 1986)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Juan R. Sanchez, Petitioner, v Robert H. Kulman, as Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility, Respondent.

—Motion, pursuant to CPLR 7002 (b) (2), for writ of habeas corpus denied. Main, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chaz GARRETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-3326.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 18, 2008.

Decided Jan. 15, 2009.

Jeffrey M. Anderson, Office of the United States Attorney, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gregory N. Dutch, Montie, Youngerman *&*Dutch, Madison, WI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

*11ORDER

Chaz Garrett was convicted after pleading guilty to distribution of 5 grams or more of crack cocaine. Judge Shabaz imposed a sentence that this court reversed and remanded because of a miscalculation of the defendant’s criminal history.

Chief Judge Crabb (not the original sentencing Judge) followed the Court of Appeals’ recommendations and sentenced Mr. Garrett based on appropriate criminal history and reduced the crack Guideline range by two levels. This resulted in the original sentence being reduced from 189 months to 121 months.

The reasoning of the court and the resulting sentence were well within the Guideline range and are not subject to further review. The district court’s order is summarily affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                             224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,156)
<INVENTORY>                                     29,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,220
<PP&E>                                         160,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,528)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,640
<BONDS>                                        230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,374)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,126
<SALES>                                        179,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,811
<CGS>                                          156,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,336)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (768)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,568)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,568)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.52)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 218/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 218 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5018 September 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 218

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5018 September 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 218/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 218/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 4 |
| 2007/C 218/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4829 — Umicore/Norsk Hydro/Hycore JV) (1) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 218/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2007/C 218/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

4

2007/C 218/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4829 — Umicore/Norsk Hydro/Hycore JV) (1)

6

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 218/04 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 218/04

Euro exchange rates

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 218/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4684 — AIG/Orco/Hospitality Invest) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2007/C 218/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4684 — AIG/Orco/Hospitality Invest) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2007/C 218/06 | Correction to the notice of a competitive public tender issued by France pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for the delegation of a public service — F-Loudes: operation of scheduled air services — Operation of scheduled air services between Le Puy-en-Velay (Loudes) and Paris (Orly) (OJ C 176, 28.7.2007) | 9 |

Corrigenda

2007/C 218/06

Correction to the notice of a competitive public tender issued by France pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for the delegation of a public service — F-Loudes: operation of scheduled air services — Operation of scheduled air services between Le Puy-en-Velay (Loudes) and Paris (Orly) (OJ C 176, 28.7.2007)

(OJ C 176, 28.7.2007)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 10.8

Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary Sheet



|                                               |  |                         |          
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ---------
|Annual Retainer                                |  | $                       | 35,000.00
|                                               | 
|Type of Meeting                                |  | Amount Paid per Meeting
|Board Meeting                                  |  | $                       | 3,500.00 
|Special Meeting                                |  | $                       | 3,500.00 
|Telephonic Board Meeting                       |  | $                       | 1,000.00 
|Compensation & Nominating Committee Meeting    |  | $                       | 1,500.00 
|Audit Committee Meeting                        |  | $                       | 3,000.00 
|Executive Committee Meeting                    |  | $                       | 3,500.00 
|Additional Fee for Chairperson (except Audit)  |  | $                       | 1,500.00 
|Additional Fee for Audit Committee Chairperson |  | $                       | 2,000.00
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:238
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 2 of 32 PageID #:239
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 3 of 32 PageID #:240
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 4 of 32 PageID #:241
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 5 of 32 PageID #:242
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 6 of 32 PageID #:243
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 7 of 32 PageID #:244
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 8 of 32 PageID #:245
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 9 of 32 PageID #:246
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 10 of 32 PageID #:247
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 11 of 32 PageID #:248
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 12 of 32 PageID #:249
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 13 of 32 PageID #:250
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 14 of 32 PageID #:251
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 15 of 32 PageID #:252
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 16 of 32 PageID #:253
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 17 of 32 PageID #:254
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 18 of 32 PageID #:255
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 19 of 32 PageID #:256
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 20 of 32 PageID #:257
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 21 of 32 PageID #:258
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 22 of 32 PageID #:259
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 23 of 32 PageID #:260
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 24 of 32 PageID #:261
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 25 of 32 PageID #:262
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 26 of 32 PageID #:263
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 27 of 32 PageID #:264
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 28 of 32 PageID #:265
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 29 of 32 PageID #:266
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 30 of 32 PageID #:267
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 31 of 32 PageID #:268
Case: 1:00-cv-07967 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/07/02 Page 32 of 32 PageID #:269
#### In the Matter of Fannie R. H., Respondent, v Charles E., Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5 to establish paternity and for an order of support, the appeal, by permission, is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Deutsch, J.), dated May 15, 1984, which, after a hearing, adjudged appellant to be the father of the child.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Although in direct conflict with the testimony of appellant, the hearing court found that the testimony of the mother that she and appellant engaged in sexual intercourse during the period of conception "has the clear ring of truth”. This finding of fact is accorded great weight by this court, since the hearing court had the opportunity to observe the mother and appellant when they testified *(see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Philip De G.,*97 AD2d 760; *Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Martinez,*96 AD2d 496). The mother’s testimony, combined with the fact that there was no evidence whatsoever that a man other than appellant had access to the mother during the period of conception and the human leucocyte antigen (HLA) test results indicating that appellant had a 99.9% "plausibility of paternity”, provides " 'clear and con*577vincing’ evidence [of paternity], evidence which is 'entirely satisfactory’ and creates a genuine belief that [appellant] is the father of the child” *(Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Philip De G.,*59 NY2d 137, 141-142). Therefore, the order of filiation is affirmed. Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
 
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Venture Seismic
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form S-8 (File No. 333-38487) and the post-effective
amendment No. 2 on Form S-3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
(File No. 33-97132) and related prospectus of the Company, of our report dated
December 17, 1997 with respect to the audits of the financial statements of
Venture Seismic Ltd. as of September 30, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the years
in the three year period ended September 30, 1997, which report is included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1997.
 
Calgary, Alberta                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG
December 23, 1997                                          Chartered Accountants
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40202-40203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15926]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2955-011]


City of Watervliet, New York; Notice of Waiver Period for Water 
Quality Certification Application

    On July 12, 2021, the City of Watervliet, New York filed with the

[[Page 40203]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a copy of its application for a 
Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification submitted 
to New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (New York 
DEC), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to 40 
CFR 121.6, we hereby notify the New York DEC of the following:
    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: July 12, 2021.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One 
year.
    Date Waiver Occurs for Failure to Act: July 12, 2022.
    If New York DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request by the above waiver date, then the agency's 
certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: July 21, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15926 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2020255EN.01000802.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/8

---

Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) and the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 November 2019 and 3 December 2019 — Marvik-Pastrogor EOOD and RODES-08 EOOD

(Cases C-818/19 and C-878/19)

(2020/C 255/10)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring courts

Varhoven kasatsionen sad, Sofiyski rayonen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Marvik-Pastrogor EOOD, RODES-08 EOOD

Defendants: Darzhavata, predstavlyavana ot Ministara na finansite, Narodno sabranie na Republika Bulgaria

By order of 30 April 2020, the Court (Tenth Chamber) declared that it manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred.

---
# C_2019206EN.01009301.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/93

---

Action brought on 18 April 2019 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO — Optima Naturals (OptiMar)

(Case T-261/19)

(2019/C 206/81)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Stada Arzneimittel AG (Bad Vilbel, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Optima Naturals Srl (Gallarate, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU trade mark OptiMar — EU trade mark No 15 176 258

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 January 2019 in Case R 1348/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15329]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Vascular and Hematology.
    Date: August 23, 2021.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Larry Pinkus, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4132, MSC 7802 Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1214, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1d1c8cfcad4d2cde1c2d2d38fcfc8c98fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33435a5d5846405f735040411d5d5a5b1d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 14, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-15329 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Annual Report of SAP AG
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Dr. Werner Brandt, the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 USC.
section 1350, that to our knowledge:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                                  
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                    
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
    and result of the operations of the Company.

Dated March 23, 2004



| |                                  
| | ---------------------------------
| | /s/ HENNING KAGERMANN            
| |                                  
| | Name: Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer   
|
| | /s/ WERNER BRANDT                
| |                                  
| | Name: Dr. Werner Brandt          
| | Title: Chief Financial Officer   

A signed original of this written statement has
been provided to SAP AG and will be retained by SAP AG and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350 and is not being filed as
part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bernard Birtha, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), each rendered November 17, 1983, convicting him of *764assault in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, attempted rape in the first degree, and attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:02-cv-05693 Document #: 13 Filed: 01/02/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:50
Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 10 Filed: 11/14/02 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:51
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 29 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 29

 To permit the waiving of the reading of an amendment if the text and 
                     adequate notice are provided.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 2011

   Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself and Mr. Merkley) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To permit the waiving of the reading of an amendment if the text and 
                     adequate notice are provided.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. READING OF AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Standing Order.--This section shall be a standing order of the 
Senate.
    (b) Waiver.--The reading of an amendment may be waived by a non-
debatable motion if the amendment--
            (1) has been submitted at least 72 hours before the motion; 
        and
            (2) is available in printed or electronic form in the 
        Congressional Record.
                                 <all>
```