alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020019EN.01005201.xml

| 20.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/52

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Sipcam Oxon v Commission

(Case T-518/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - Plant protection products - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Active substance chlorothalonil - Conditions of approval for placing on the market - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency)

(2020/C 19/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sipcam Oxon SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Mereu and P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Naglis and A. Dawes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/677 of 29 April 2019 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance chlorothalonil, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2019 L 114, p. 15).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL VENABLE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1583

[September 15, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S. Fein, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-1384CF10A.

Michael Venable, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,472
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,703
<INVENTORY>                                      5,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,657
<PP&E>                                         125,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,263)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 525,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          137,181
<BONDS>                                         18,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           33,703
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   525,904
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,121
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (11,166)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (33)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,057)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (2,726)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,783)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (1,941.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00533-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF 

MYRNA ELIZABETH HERRERA AND VICTOR HUGO GRACIA ROMAN

On Appeal from the

370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-3762-14-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 27, 2023
Case: 1:01-cv-01468 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1
Case: 1:01-cv-01468 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:2
Case: 1:01-cv-01468 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:3
Case: 1:01-cv-01468 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:4
Case: 1:01-cv-01468 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:5
Case: 1:01-cv-01468 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:6
Case: 1:01-cv-01468 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:7
Case: 1:01-cv-01468 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:8
Case: 1:01-cv-01468 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:9
# Official Journal C 170A/17 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 170A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6117 May 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 170A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6117 May 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2018/C 170 A/01 | Notice of open competitions — EPSO/AD/358/18 — German-language (DE) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/359/18 — Dutch-language (NL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2018/C 170 A/01

Notice of open competitions — EPSO/AD/358/18 — German-language (DE) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/359/18 — Dutch-language (NL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 279 

Expressing support for the designation of September 24, 2011, as ‘‘Worldwide 

Day of Play’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Ms. AYOTTE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of September 24, 

2011, as ‘‘Worldwide Day of Play’’. 

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, since 1980, obesity prevalence among children has almost tripled and approximately 12,500,000, or 

17 percent, of children and adolescents in the United 

States are obese; 

Whereas according to the American Academy of Pediatrics 

study entitled ‘‘The Importance of Play in Promoting 

Healthy Child Development and Maintaining Strong Parent-Child Bonds’’— 

(1) play is essential to development because play 

contributes to the cognitive, physical, social, and emotional well-being of children and youth; 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 279 ATS 

(2) play offers an ideal opportunity for parents to 

engage fully with children; and 

(3) despite the benefits derived from play for both 

children and parents, time for free play has been significantly reduced for some children and youth in the United 

States; 

Whereas Worldwide Day of Play is the centerpiece of The 

Big Help, the long-term commitment of Nickelodeon to 

empower children and families by providing the tools and 

information children and families need to take action on 

the issues children and families care about; 

Whereas in each of the 50 States and in 13 countries, including at United States military bases around the globe, 

children and families celebrate Worldwide Day of Play; 

Whereas on September 24, 2011, Nickelodeon will host the 

8th annual Worldwide Day of Play; 

Whereas in 2011, in collaboration with the Let’s Move! campaign started by First Lady Michelle Obama and the 

President’s Council on Fitness, Sports and Nutrition, the 

Nickelodeon Worldwide Day of Play will be held on the 

Ellipse in Washington, District of Columbia; 

Whereas September 24, 2011, would be an appropriate date 

to designate as Worldwide Day of Play: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation 

2 of September 24, 2011, as ‘‘Worldwide Day of Play’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  978,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    819,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,423,000
<PP&E>                                         318,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (129,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,788,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          834,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,915,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,788,000
<SALES>                                      4,589,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,589,000
<CGS>                                      (3,229,000)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (1,266,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (376,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (195,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (580,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (510,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (510,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I,
L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                               /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Robert K. Moskovitz
                                               Chief Financial Officer

                                               March 31, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Bull Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 6, 2011
By
/s/ Timothy BarryTimothy Barry, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          56,385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                       612
<INVENTORY>                                      8,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,741
<PP&E>                                         121,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                (27,866)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,609
<BONDS>                                        130,261
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,983
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,366
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,411
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (26,509)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    67
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,055)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (112)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,568)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (2,028)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,596)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (823.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001031003
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-06-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                   309,278,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,185,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               315,463,968
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,463,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,185,568
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                    300,000,000
<COMMON>                                         9,278,400
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,463,968
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,082,477
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,082,477
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,082,477
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,082,477
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                             |   |   |   |
| Dated: April      14 , 2009 |   |   |   | By:    |   | /s/   Eddie      Vakser |
|                             |   |   |   |   |   | Eddie      Vakser Interim Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Foust, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered October 17, 1983, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Upon a review of the record, we find that legally sufficient evidence was presented, upon which, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found that the elements of the crime were proved beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621). The alleged prosecutorial misconduct in summation was either not objected to, and therefore any error of law with respect thereto was not preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Nuccie,*57 NY2d 818; *People v Baldo,*107 AD2d 751; *People v Saylor,*115 AD2d 671), or was harmless in light of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt and the court’s curative instructions *(cf. People v Wood,*66 NY2d 374). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Commemorative Brands, Inc.

                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                       (In thousands, except share data)

================================================================================
Column A                                                Column B
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                          May 31, 1997           May 31, 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average common and common equivalent
 shares outstanding..................     375,000                 375,000

Net income (loss)....................    $ (1,174)               $ (5,285)
                                         ========                ======== 

Earnings per common share:
  Net income (loss) per common and
  common equivalent share............    $  (3.13)               $ (14.09)
                                         ========                ========
#### Joseph Guidone et al., Appellants, v Town of Hempstead et al., Respondents.

[942 NYS2d 632]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated October 29, 2010, which granted the *1055defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

The injured plaintiff allegedly fell when his left foot went into a crack or slot in the grassy area between the curb and the sidewalk abutting his property. Pursuant to its contract with the defendant Town of Hempstead, the defendant Welsbach Electric Corp. performed some work in the area prior to the accident. As a result, the injured plaintiff and his wife, suing derivatively, commenced this action against the defendants. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that the alleged defect was trivial and not actionable. The Supreme Court granted the motion. The plaintiffs appeal, and we reverse.

Generally, the issue of whether a dangerous condition exists depends on the particular facts of each case, and is properly a question of fact for the jury *(see Trincere v County of Suffolk,*90 NY2d 976 [1997]; *DeLaRosa v City of New York,*61 AD3d 813 [2009]). In determining whether a defect is trivial, the court must examine all of the facts presented, including the “width, depth, elevation, irregularity and appearance of the defect along with the time, placet,] and circumstance of the injury” *(Trincere v County of Suffolk,*90 NY2d at 978 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

The Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Here, the evidence submitted by the defendants, including deposition testimony and photographs, was insufficient to demonstrate as a matter of law that the alleged defect was trivial, and therefore not actionable *(see Perez v 655 Montauk, LLC,*81 AD3d 619 [2011]; *Corrado v City of New York,*6 AD3d 380 [2004]). Since the defendants failed to meet their initial burden as the movants, it is not necessary to review the sufficiency of the opposition papers *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Rivera, J.P., Hall, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.