alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 10/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 10 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6014 January 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 10

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6014 January 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/72 of 23 September 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying conditions for data waiver permissions (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/73 of 13 January 2017 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 5 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/74 of 25 November 2016 establishing a common fiscal marker for gas oils and kerosene
  (notified under document C(2016) 7546) | 7 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/72 of 23 September 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying conditions for data waiver permissions (
  1
  )

1

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/73 of 13 January 2017 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

5

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/74 of 25 November 2016 establishing a common fiscal marker for gas oils and kerosene
  (notified under document C(2016) 7546)

(notified under document C(2016) 7546)

7

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Eleventh Council Directive 89/666/EEC of 21 December 1989 concerning disclosure requirements in respect of branches opened in a Member State by certain types of company governed by the law of another State ( OJ L 395, 30.12.1989 ) | 10 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Eleventh Council Directive 89/666/EEC of 21 December 1989 concerning disclosure requirements in respect of branches opened in a Member State by certain types of company governed by the law of another State ( OJ L 395, 30.12.1989 )

( OJ L 395, 30.12.1989 )

10

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### James GODOY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert A. HOREL, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-15801.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 11, 2011.*

Filed July 13, 2011.

Herman Franck, Elizabeth Vogel, Esquire, Franck & Associates, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Christopher Michael Young, Esquire, Attorney General Office, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

*327Before: HUG, SILVERMAN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiffs are eight California prisoners who challenge the decision by Defendants, who are state officials or employees, to raise the price of certain goods, such as coffee, in the prison canteen. Reviewing de novo the district court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), *Caviness v. Horizon Cmty. Learning Ctr., Inc.,*590 F.3d 806, 811-12 (9th Cir.2010), we affirm the district court for the cogent reasons stated in its order.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                          OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, the undersigned Jack (J.D.) Draper, President and Chief Executive
Officer of FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

     1. The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 22, 2005                /s/ Jack (J.D.) Draper
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Jack (J.D.) Draper
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          Principal Executive Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DANIEL ARTHUR WHITE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-2237

August 7, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Robin F. Fuson, Judge.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for 

Appellant

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, BLACK, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ JOSEPH R. TOMKINSON
|Joseph R. Tomkinson    
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 13, 2005           
|                       
|/s/ RICHARD J. JOHNSON 
|Richard J. Johnson     
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 13, 2005           



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 will be provided to Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### WILSON, Respondent, v. UTICA GAS & ELECTRIC CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1907.)

Action by John Wilson against the Utica Gas & Electric Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Case: 1:01-cv-02963 Document #: 222 Filed: 08/27/04 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2972
Case: 1:01-cv-02963 Document #: 222 Filed: 08/27/04 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2972
Case: 1:01-cv-02963 Document #: 222 Filed: 08/27/04 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:2972
Case: 1:01-cv-02963 Document #: 222 Filed: 08/27/04 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:2972
Case: 1:01-cv-02963 Document #: 222 Filed: 08/27/04 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:2972
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-81961 and No. 333-81967) on Forms S-8 pertaining to the Nicholas Financial, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan and the Nicholas
Financial, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan of our report dated June 29, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Nicholas Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended March 31, 2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

LOGO

Atlanta, Georgia

June 29, 2006





LOGO
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, George J. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.













Date:  November
      3, 2009
            /s/ George J.
      Carter
              George
      J. Carter
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### James McGown, Appellant, v Kim Esposito et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[941 NYS2d 656]

In an action to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated November 30, 2010, which, upon an order of the same court dated November 5, 2010, granting the motion of the defendants Kim Esposito, John Esposito, Deborah Hanley, and Kiwi Pub Corp. pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, is in favor of those defendants and against him dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The notice of appeal from the order is deemed to be a notice of appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5512 [a]).

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion of the defendants Kim Esposito, John Esposito, Deborah Hanley, and Kiwi Pub Corp. pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them is denied, the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against them, and the order dated November 5, 2010, is modified accordingly.

The material submitted by the defendants Kim Esposito, John Esposito, Deborah Hanley, and Kiwi Pub Corp. (hereinafter collectively the defendants) did not establish that the plaintiff lacked standing to commence this action *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] [3]; *Salzman Sign Co. v Beck,*10 NY2d 63, 67 [1961]; *Key Equip. Fin. v South Shore Imaging, Inc.,*69 AD3d 805 [2010]; *Dulik v Amante,*173 AD2d 674 [1991]; *cf. Quatrochi v Citibank,*210 AD2d 53 [1994]; *General Motors Acceptance Corp. v Kalkstein,*101 AD2d 102 [1984]). The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendants’ motion pursuant CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RICHARD L. MARTIN AND TWILA J. 

MARTIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND 

MARLIN L. MARTIN AND MARLENE B. 

MARTIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE

v.

HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP ZONING 

HEARING BOARD

v.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 408 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP

PETITION OF: RICHARD L. MARTIN AND 

TWILA J. MARTIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, 

AND MARLIN L. MARTIN AND MARLENE 

B. MARTIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE
##### 



Exhibit 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|                                              |  |                                                |  |            |      |                  |  |            
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | ---- | ---------------- |  | -----------
|                                              |  |                                                |  | Percentage |      | State of        
|                                              |  |                                                |  | of         |      | Incorporation or
|Percent                                       |  | Subsidiary                                     |  | Ownership  |      | Organization    
|                                              |  |                                                |  |            |      |                 
|ITLA Capital Corporation                      |  | Imperial Capital Bank                          |  |            | 100% |                  |  | California 
|                                             
|ITLA Capital Corporation                      |  | ITLA Funding Corporation                       |  |            | 100% |                  |  | Delaware   
|                                             
|ITLA Funding Corporation                      |  | ITLA Servicing Corporation                     |  |            | 100% |                  |  | Delaware   
|                                             
|ITLA Funding Corporation                      |  | ITLA Commercial Warehouse Corporation          |  |            | 100% |                  |  | Delaware   
|                                             
|ITLA Capital Corporation                      |  | ITLA Management Corporation                    |  |            | 100% |                  |  | Delaware   
|                                             
|ITLA Management Corporation                   |  | ITLA Commercial Investment Corporation         |  |            | 100% |                  |  | Maryland   
|                                             
|ITLA Capital Corporation                      |  | Imperial Capital Real Estate Investment Trust  |  |            | 100% |                  |  | Delaware   
|                                             
|Imperial Capital Real Estate
Investment Trust |  | ICCMAC Multifamily and
Commercial Trust 1999-I |  |            | 100% |                  |  | Delaware   
|                                             
|ITLA Capital Corporation                      |  | ITLA Capital Statutory Trust I                 |  |            | 100% | (1)              |  | Connecticut
|                                             
|ITLA Capital Corporation                      |  | ITLA Capital Statutory Trust II                |  |            | 100% | (1)              |  | Connecticut



---

|(1) |  | Represents ownership of the common securities of the trust.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



89
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Liquor Group  Wholesale,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  February 28, 2009, as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Jason Bandy, Chief Financial Officer,  Principal  Accounting Officer,  Secretary
and  Treasurer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: April 17, 2009


/s/          Jason Bandy
-------------------------------------------
(Chief Financial Officer/Principal
Accounting Officer/Secretary / Treasurer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# L_2008284EN.01S00301.xml

| 28.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 284/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 284/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Exhibit 99.5


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B)


OR RULE 15D-14 (B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE


ACT OF 1934 AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18


OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


In connection with the Annual Report of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Bruce Flatt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:/s/ J. Bruce FlattJ. Bruce FlattChief Executive Officer


March 31, 2017
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                        Consent of Independent Auditors

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Enterprise Systems, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-1598) on Form S-8 of Enterprise Systems, Inc. of our reports dated February
10, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Enterprise Systems,
Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and relating
to the financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31,
1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Enterprise Systems, Inc.


                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 26, 1997
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: January 21, 2004 |  |  |  |                                         
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ David J. Wagner                     
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | Name:         David J. Wagner           
|                       |  |  |  | Title:           Chief Financial Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN J. ODELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION; SEATTLE PACIFIC

UNIVERSITY,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-35660

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00165-RAJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2011** 

Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. 

Stephen J. Odell appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

and dismissal order in his action alleging state law claims against Seattle Pacific

University (“SPU”) and a Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) claim against the

FILED

NOV 01 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-35660

Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §

1291. We review de novo both a grant of summary judgement, Universal Health

Servs., Inc. v. Thompson, 363 F.3d 1013, 1019 (9th Cir. 2004), and a dismissal for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Kruso v. Ints. Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416,

1421 (9th Cir. 1989). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Odell’s tort claims

against SPU because the claims were barred by the statute of limitations. See

Wash. Rev. Code § 4.16.100(1).

The district court properly dismissed Odell’s FTCA claim for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction because Odell failed to file an administrative claim before filing

this action. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2401(b), 2675(a); Marley v. United States, 567 F.3d

1030, 1034-37 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider Odell’s constitutional claims raised for the first time on

appeal. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).

Odell’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal C 322A/2 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 322A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 592 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 322A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 592 September 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 322 A/01 | Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/AD/310/15 and EPSO/AST/136/15 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2016/C 322 A/01

Reserve lists — Open competitions EPSO/AD/310/15 and EPSO/AST/136/15

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN