alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019246EN.01003901.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/39

---

Action brought on 28 May 2019 — Cipriani v EUIPO — Hotel Cipriani (ARRIGO CIPRIANI)

(Case T-325/19)

(2019/C 246/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Arrigo Cipriani (Venice, Italy) (represented by: S. Bergia and G. Sironi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hotel Cipriani Srl (Venice, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ARRIGO CIPRIANI — Application for registration No 14 063 838

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 March 2019 in Case R 406/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the opposition filed by Hotel Cipriani s.r.l., or refer the case back to EUIPO in order that it may give a decision in accordance with the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition filed by Hotel Cipriani s.r.l., or refer the case back to EUIPO in order that it may give a decision in accordance with the judgment;

| — | order full reimbursement of the costs of the present proceedings, including those of the previous procedural stages before EUIPO, in favour of Arrigo Cipriani. |
| --- | --- |

—

order full reimbursement of the costs of the present proceedings, including those of the previous procedural stages before EUIPO, in favour of Arrigo Cipriani.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Bluefly, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Kara B. Jenny, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Kara B.
Jenny





Kara B.
Jenny


Chief
Financial Officer


November
8, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<CIK>                            0001031002
<NAME>                           MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING II, L.P.
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-26-1998
<CASH>                                          234,731
<SECURITIES>                                363,890,082
<RECEIVABLES>                                 7,204,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            371,329,181
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              371,329,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         7,204,368
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                 309,278,400
<COMMON>                                     54,846,413
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                371,329,181
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             14,508,404
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              14,508,404
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          14,508,404
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 14,508,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
Case 10-00898 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:12:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 8
Case 10-00898 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:12:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 8
Case 10-00898 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:12:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 8
Case 10-00898 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:12:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 8
Case 10-00898 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:12:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 8
Case 10-00898 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:12:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 8
Case 10-00898 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:12:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 8
Case 10-00898 Doc 1 Filed 01/12/10 Entered 01/12/10 12:12:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 8
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated July 27, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2082 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-255279) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


	 	/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 27, 2021
# C_2020019EN.01001002.xml

| 20.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 30 September 2019 — GR v Stadt Duisburg

(Case C-720/19)

(2020/C 19/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: GR

Defendant: Stadt Duisburg

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a family member of a Turkish worker, who is able to derive from the latter rights under the first paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC-Turkey Association Council (‘Decision No 1/80’), lose those rights if he acquires the nationality of the host Member State and loses his previous nationality? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a family member of a Turkish worker, who is able to derive from the latter rights under the first paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC-Turkey Association Council (‘Decision No 1/80’), lose those rights if he acquires the nationality of the host Member State and loses his previous nationality?

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Can the family member of the Turkish worker in the situation described then continue to rely on the rights under Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 if he has lost the nationality of the host Member State because he has reacquired his previous nationality? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Can the family member of the Turkish worker in the situation described then continue to rely on the rights under Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 if he has lost the nationality of the host Member State because he has reacquired his previous nationality?

---
# C_2019155EN.01005401.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/54

---

Action brought on 14 March 2019 — Bog-Fran v EUIPO — Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ (Furniture)

(Case T-159/19)

(2019/C 155/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bog-Fran sp. z o.o. sp.k. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Mikosza, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ S.A. (Ostrów Mazowiecka, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: European Union design No 1384 002-0034

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 January 2019 in Case R 291/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the proceedings and reimburse the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the proceedings and reimburse the applicant’s costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-121562) and Form S-8
(Nos. 333-12025, 333-68128, 333-83650, 333-106647, 333-117070, 333-117137 and 333-128113) and related Prospectuses of Impac Mortgage Holding, Inc. of our reports dated March 7, 2006 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Impac Mortgage Holding, Inc., management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of Impac Mortgage Holding, Inc., in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.



Los
Angeles, California
March 10, 2006

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,John Mutch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatexcept for the failure to timely file the report, the Quarterly Report ofPeregrine Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Systems, Inc.
| Date: April 29, 2005 |                                    |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ John Mutch                          |
|                 | John Mutch                              |
|                 | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Systems, Inc. and willbe retained by Peregrine Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission upon request.

----
# Official Journal C 1/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 514 January 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 1

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 514 January 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 001/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2008/C 001/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2008/C 001/03 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 001/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2008/C 001/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2008/C 001/03

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 001/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5002 — Wacker Chemie/WPS/APP) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |
| 2008/C 001/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4950 — Aviva/Bank Zachodni) (1) | 5 |
| 2008/C 001/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4940 — Credit Suisse/General Electric/Mubadala) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |
| 2008/C 001/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4982 — Bouygues/Artemis/Serendipity) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 7 |
| 2008/C 001/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4926 — Basell/Berre L'Étang Refinery) (1) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2008/C 001/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5002 — Wacker Chemie/WPS/APP) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

2008/C 001/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4950 — Aviva/Bank Zachodni) (1)

5

2008/C 001/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4940 — Credit Suisse/General Electric/Mubadala) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

2008/C 001/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4982 — Bouygues/Artemis/Serendipity) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

7

2008/C 001/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4926 — Basell/Berre L'Étang Refinery) (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 370/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 370 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6112 October 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 370

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6112 October 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2018/C 370/01 ECB/2018/23 | Recommendation of the European Central Bank of 4 October 2018 to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas (ECB/2018/23) | 1 |

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

European Central Bank

2018/C 370/01 ECB/2018/23

Recommendation of the European Central Bank of 4 October 2018 to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas (ECB/2018/23)

1

---

| | II   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 370/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8952 — STEAG/Siemens/JV STEAG GuD) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2018/C 370/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8828 — Gauselmann/NOVOMATIC/Spielbank Bad Neuenahr/Spielbank Mainz JV) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 370/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8952 — STEAG/Siemens/JV STEAG GuD) (
  1
  )

1

2

2018/C 370/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8828 — Gauselmann/NOVOMATIC/Spielbank Bad Neuenahr/Spielbank Mainz JV) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 370/04 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| 2018/C 370/05 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC (Publication of references of European Assessment Documents in accordance with Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011)
   (
  1
  ) | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 370/04

Euro exchange rates

3

2018/C 370/05

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC (Publication of references of European Assessment Documents in accordance with Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011)
   (
  1
  )

(Publication of references of European Assessment Documents in accordance with Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011)

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the 
agreements to the Secretary by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8fbcdcbdacddcc9dad1e8cec5cb86cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d083b5b3a2b5a4b1a2a990b6bdb3feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail, 
Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be 
most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are 
available through the Commission's website (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb8f899a9f9e9a959a9782889288bb9d9698d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a1e180b0e0f0b040b06131903192a0c0709440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Agreement No.: 012437-001.
    Agreement Name: MOL/NMCC/WWOCEAN Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: Wallenius Wilhelmsen Ocean AS; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; 
and Nissan Motor Car Carriers Co., Ltd.
    Filing Party: Rebecca Fenneman; Jeffrey/Fenneman Law and Strategy 
PLLC.
    Synopsis: The amendment renames the Agreement, updates Wallenius 
Wilhelmsen Ocean AS' name and address, removes WLS as a party, and 
removes all authority to jointly negotiate or procure terminal services 
in the United States.
    Proposed Effective Date: 7/9/2021.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/1905.

    Agreement No.: 201365.
    Agreement Name: Lease Agreement between the Commonwealth Ports 
Authority and Saipan Stevedore Company.
    Parties: Commonwealth Ports Authority and the Saipan Stevedore 
Company, Inc.
    Filing Party: Joy Ann Tenorio; Commonwealth Ports Authority.
    Synopsis: This agreement leases to Saipan Stevedore Co., Inc. 
portions of the Saipan commercial dock space, warehouse, maintenance 
and office space and exclusive stevedoring rights at the Port of Saipan 
on the island of Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
    Proposed Effective Date: 7/15/2021.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/47529.

    Dated: July 16, 2021.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15516 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD K. MAUZEY,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

A. P. KANE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 07-16040

D.C. No. CV-05-03337-MHP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Ronald K. Mauzey appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

FILED

JUN 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether the 2004 1

decision of the California Board of Prison Terms (“the Board”) to deny parole

violated due process. We deny a certificate of appealability as to Mauzey’s claim

that the denial of parole violated his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth

Amendments. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

2 07-16040

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. 1

Mauzey contends that the Board’s 2004 decision to deny him parole was not

supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights. 

Following an independent review of the record, see Himes v. Thompson, 336 F.3d

848, 853 (9th Cir. 2003), we conclude that the state court’s conclusion that some

evidence supports the Board’s decision was not objectively unreasonable. See 28

U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Hayward v. Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL

1664977, at *11, *17 (9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2010). 

AFFIRMED.