alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Globecomm Systems Inc. Financial Statements, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          26,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,673
<PP&E>                                           9,185
<DEPRECIATION>                                     778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,492
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,340
<SALES>                                         14,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,591
<CGS>                                           12,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (263)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TAVARRESS ALEXANDER WILSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1741

[January 16, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2015-CF008190-A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ.,concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of October 31, 2010, and for the period then ended.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Tracy G. Smith       
|Tracy G. Smith           
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer  
|                         
|January 24, 2011
# C_2022482EN.01001601.xml

| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 482/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 482/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-850/19) (1)

(State aid - Activities linked to the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products - State aid schemes established by Greece in the form of interest subsidies and State guarantees on existing loans and new loans in order to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences - Decision declaring the aid schemes incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid paid - Aid limited to affected geographical areas - Advantage - Selective nature - Principle of sound administration - Duration of the procedure - Legitimate expectation - Limitation period - Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589)

(2022/C 482/23)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Tsaousi, E. Leftheriotou and A.-V. Vasilopoulou, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and T. Ramopoulos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the Hellenic Republic seeks the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/394 of 7 October 2019 concerning the measures SA.39119 (2016/C) (ex 2015/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by the Hellenic Republic in the form of interest subsidies and guarantees linked to the fires of 2007 (the present decision covers only the agricultural sector) (OJ 2020 L 76, p. 4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.

---
Exhibit 15

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Supervisory Board of SAP SE:

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-60399, 333-65083, 333-30380, 333-41762, 333-63496, 333-63464, 333-102564, 333-167870, 333-173782, 333-190780 and 333-213436) on Form S-8 of SAP SE of our report dated February
22, 2017, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of SAP SE as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, which report appears in the December 31, 2016 annual report on Form 20-F of SAP SE.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ KPMG AG                    
|Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Mannheim, Germany

February 22,
2017
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



               STATEMENT REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

        Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes
effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein
not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration
statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person
knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the
registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection
with the registration statement.

        On May 29, 2002, ITLA Capital Corporation (the "Company") dismissed
Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen") as its independent public accountants
and engaged Ernst & Young LLP to serve as its independent public accountants for
the year ended December 31, 2002. In 2002, Arthur Andersen ceased practicing
before the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). As a result,
the Company has been unable to obtain Arthur Andersen's written consent to the
incorporation by reference into registration statements filed with the
Commission by the Company of their audit report with respect to the Company's
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001, included
in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002.

        The absence of such consent may limit recovery by investors on certain
claims. In particular, and without limitation, investors may not be able to
assert claims against Arthur Anderson under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act
for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial
statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact
required to be stated therein. Accordingly, investors would be unable to assert
a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act
because it has not consented to the incorporation by reference of its previously
issued report into registration statements filed with the Commission by the
Company.
EXHIBIT 32.2







Certification of Principal Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Bull Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 6, 2011
By
/s/ Sean FallisSean Fallis, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Prakash Agarwal, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporationon Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 27, 2003 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents inall material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofNeoMagic Corporation.

 
|   | By:    |                    | /s/ Prakash  Agarwal |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   |   |
|   | Name:  | Prakash  Agarwal        |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |
|        |        |                         |                      |        |  |

 

I, Stephen T. Lanza, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporationon Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 27, 2003 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents inall material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofNeoMagic Corporation.

 
|   | By:    |                    | /s/ Stephen  T. Lanza |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   |   |
|   | Name:  | Stephen T.  Lanza       |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |        |                         |                       |        |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements accompanying the filings of Form 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         624,879
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,905,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                    80,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,537,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,057,806
<PP&E>                                         766,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 196,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,706,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,475,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,229,740
<OTHER-SE>                                   (831,424)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,706,455
<SALES>                                      5,336,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,336,914
<CGS>                                        3,710,921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,723,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (351,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (351,521)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (351,521)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:03-cv-00280 Document 60 Filed 11/16/05 Page 11 of 11
#### DANIEL J. KOPEC, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. THEODORE S. KAKOWSKI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

October 17, 1960.

*Mr. Thomas F. McGuire*and *Mr. Sidney P. McCord, Jr.,*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano*for the respondent.

Granted.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-17331 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Broadway Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors and the Broadway Financial Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan and Registration StatementNo. 333-102138 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Broadway Financial Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan of our report dated March 27, 2009, on the consolidated financial statements Broadway Financial Corporation and subsidiaries, which reportis included in Form 10-K for Broadway Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Crowe HorwathLLP 

South Bend, Indiana 

March 27, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Paul William Fulton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of
Lihir Gold Limited for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 12, 2005

                                              /s/ Paul Fulton
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: Paul Fulton
                                              Title: General Manager Commercial
#### SEI JIANG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70568.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 22, 2011.

Gary J. Yerman, Esquire, Law Office of Gary J. Yerman, New York, NY, for Petitioner/Respondent.

OIL, Tiffany Walters Kleinert, Trial, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Liza Murcia, Jennifer Paisner Williams, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*956Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sei Jiang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, review de novo questions of law, and review for substantial evidence the BIA’s factual findings. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review, and remand for further proceedings.

The BIA abused its discretion by denying Jiang’s motion to reopen where Jiang submitted a notice from his local family planning committee indicating that a Chinese citizen with two children would be targeted for sterilization. *See Tang v. Gonzales,*489 F.3d 987, 990 (9th Cir.2007) (defining the term “forced” at 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(B) broadly as “compelling, obliging, or constraining by mental, moral, or circumstantial means”). In addition, substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s determination that Jiang failed to show that his spouse and two United States citizen children would return to China where Jiang’s declaration avers that they would accompany him if he were removed to China. *See Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft,*298 F.3d 888, 892 (9th Cir.2002) (“[T]he Board must accept as true the facts stated in an alien’s affidavit in ruling upon his motion to reopen unless it finds those facts to be inherently unbelievable.”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). We therefore remand for the BIA to reconsider Jiang’s changed country conditions claim in light of this disposition.

We need not reach Jiang’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

No. 17

- 3010

________________

BRADLEY BEERS;

JOSEPH DIVITA*,

Appellants

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL

TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES; THOMAS E. BRANDON, Deputy Director

of the ATF; RONALD B. TURK, Associates Deputy Director/ Chief Operating Office of

the ATF; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; DIRECTOR FEDERAL

BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ;

PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL; PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE;

TYREE BLOCKER, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police; EDWARD

DONNELLY, Bucks County Sheriff; BUCKS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT;

BUCKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

*(Party Dismissed Pursuant to Court Order dated 02/13/18)

_______________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D. C. Civil No. 2

- 16

- cv

- 06440)

District Judge: Honorable Legrome D. Davis

________________

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

Submitted on Remand June 19, 2020

Before: SHWARTZ, ROTH and RENDELL, Circuit Judges

_________________

JUDGMENT ORDER

__________________By opinion and judgment entered on June 20, 2019 , this Court affirmed the

judgment of the District Court. Appellant Br adley Beers filed a petition for writ of

certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, which was granted. On May 1 8 , 2020

, the

Supreme Court v acated the judgment of this Court and remanded with instructions to

dismiss the case as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc ., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).

On consideration whereof, it is now hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the appeal is dismissed as mo ot. The Clerk is

directed to issue the mandate.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Jane R. Roth

Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit

Clerk

Dated: September 25, 2020