alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 144 (Friday, July 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 41033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16285]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 30, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Prabal Chakrabarti, Senior Vice 
President) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b39342855282938553a0b0b1712181a0f1214150855381416161e150f083b191408551d09195514091c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c1e130f720f0e1f721d2c2c30353f3d283533322f721f3331313932282f1c3e332f723a2e3e72332e3b">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Eastern Bankshares Inc., Boston, Massachusetts; to acquire 
Century Bancorp, Inc., Medford, Massachusetts, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Century Bank and Trust Company, Somerville, Massachusetts.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 27, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-16285 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Metalline Mining Company (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Merlin
      Bingham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Merlin Bingham


President
      and Chief Executive Officer








Dated:
      March 16, 2007




E-3
Document

EXHIBIT 10f




Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013
Attention: Richard Rivera




June 1, 2021


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Re: Extension of Maturity Date


Reference is made to the Five Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2011 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified prior to the date hereof, the “Credit Agreement”) among Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation  (the “Company”), the Borrowing Subsidiaries, the lenders parties thereto (the “Lenders”), certain Agents, Citibank , N.A., as an Administrative Agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as an Administrative Agent. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Credit Agreement.


Pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Credit Agreement, the Company hereby requests that the Lenders extend the Maturity Date in effect on the date hereof (i.e., September 29, 2024) such that the extended Maturity Date under the Credit Agreement will be September 29, 2025. This letter shall constitute an “Extension Letter” as referred to in Section 2.5 of the Credit Agreement. 




						
	
	
	BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
		
		
		
		/s/ Sandra Ramos-Alves
		Name: Sandra Ramos-Alves
		Title: Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NM Holdings, Inc./Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Incorporated in Merger Discussions

     March 17, 1999.  Minneapolis, Minnesota.  NMHoldings, Inc. (OTC-NMED) and
MJK Holdings, Inc. announced today that they are actively engaged in the
negotiation of a definitive agreement for the merger of the two companies.  MJK
Holdings, Inc. is the Parent Corporation of Miller Johnson & Kuehn, Incorporated
(MJK), a Minneapolis-based regional investment-banking firm with offices in
Minnesota, Texas, Florida, Illinois and California.  Privately owned MJK also
acts as a fully disclosed clearing broker for approximately 35 brokerage firms
located across the United States.  In addition to both retail and institutional
equity and debt investment banking activities, the firm has previously announced
its intentions to move into the Internet areas as one of a relatively small
number of Internet brokers which are self clearing.  The firm is currently
ranked 3rd in size among brokerage firms headquartered in Minnesota, and was
selected by City Business as one of the 40 fastest growing privately held firms
in Minnesota in 1997 and 1998.  The execution of a definitive agreement is
subject to the negotiation of terms and to due diligence and is also subject to
approval by the respective boards of directors and shareholders.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone TOSSIE, a/k/a Popeye, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-5331.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 29, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 12, 2011.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Jennifer *845P. May-Parker, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Tossie appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a twelve-month term of imprisonment. He argues that the district court plainly erred in failing to explain its sentence. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the sentence and remand for further proceedings.

This court reviews a sentence imposed upon revocation of a defendant’s supervised release to determine whether the sentence is “plainly unreasonable.” *United States v. Crudup,*461 F.3d 433, 437 (4th Cir.2006). In determining whether a revocation sentence is “plainly unreasonable,” this Court must first determine whether the sentence is procedurally or substantively unreasonable. *Id.*at 438. Although a sentencing court must consider the Chapter Seven policy statements and the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors in fashioning its sentence, the sentencing court retains broad discretion to revoke a defendant’s supervised release and impose a term of imprisonment up to the statutory maximum. *Id.*at 439. Because Tossie did not request a lesser sentence, he must show that any error was plain and affected his substantial rights. *United States v. Lynn,*592 F.3d 572, 578-79 (4th Cir.2010).

Although the discretion afforded district courts is such that this court “may be hard-pressed to find any explanation for within-range, revocation sentences insufficient ... a district court may not simply impose sentence without giving *any*indication of its reasons for doing so.” *United States v. Thompson,*595 F.3d 544, 547 (4th Cir.2010). Here, the district court failed to offer any explanation at all for imposing a twelve-month sentence. We have held that this constitutes plain error. *Thompson,*595 F.3d at 548. Additionally, the record does not include any calculation of the applicable advisory Guidelines range, which prevents our review of whether the error affected Tossie’s substantial rights. Accordingly, we vacate Tossie’s sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with this opinion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*
#### Maria Pappas, Respondent, v Anthony Pappas, Defendant. Eleftheria Pappas Grantor Trust et al., Nonparty Appellants.

[944 NYS2d 905] —

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, nonparties Eleftheria Pappas Grantor Trust and Anthony Pappas & Company, LLP appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Falanga, J.), entered June 24, 2011, which denied their motion for leave to intervene in the action.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal by Helwig, Henderson, Ryan & Spinola is deemed to be a notice of appeal by nonparties Eleftheria Pappas Grantor Trust and Anthony Pappas & Company, LLP *(see*CPLR 2001; *Matter of Tagliaferri v Weiler, 1*NY3d 605 [2004]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

Contrary to the proposed intervenors’ contention, their motion for leave to intervene was untimely *(see JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Edelson,*90 AD3d 996, 997 [2011]; *Carnrike u Youngs,*70 AD3d 1146, 1147 [2010]; *A.F.C. Enters., Inc. v New York City School Constr. Auth. [Maxwell High School],*71 AD3d 925, 926 [2010]; *Oparaji v Weston,*293 AD2d 592 [2002]). In any event, the proposed intervenors were not entitled to intervene as of right in this action *(see*CPLR 1012 [a] [2]; *A.F.C.*
      *1284
      *Enters., Inc. v New York City School Constr. Auth. [Maxwell High School],*71 AD3d at 926), as their interests are adequately represented by the defendant. Moreover, the denial at this time of leave to intervene by permission was a provident exercise of the Supreme Court’s discretion *(see*CPLR 1013; *A.F.C. Enters., Inc. v New York City School Constr. Auth. [Maxwell High School],*71 AD3d at 926; *Osman v Sternberg,*168 AD2d 490 [1990]).

The proposed intervenors’ remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, A.EJ, Florio, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                        PACIFICHEALTH LABORATORIES, INC.

         PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of said corporation,
a resolution was adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the Certificate
of Incorporation of said corporation, proposing and declaring said amendment to
be advisable and calling a meeting of the shareholders of said corporation for
consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows:

         RESOLVED, that the total number of shares of all classes of stock which
         the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 51,000,000 shares,
         consisting of (a) 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.0025
         per share, and (b) 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01
         per share. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, may
         have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such
         designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or
         other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions as
         shall be stated in the resolution or resolutions providing for the
         issuance thereof adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

         SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of
Directors, a special meeting of the shareholders of said corporation was duly
called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at which meeting the necessary number
of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

<PAGE>

         THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Sections 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. has caused
this certificate to be signed by Robert Portman, President, this 7th day of
February, 2002.

                                                PACIFICHEALTH LABORATORIES, INC.

                                                By: /s/ ROBERT PORTMAN
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Robert Portman, President
(January 31, 1986)

#### In the Matter of Martin A. Berchenko, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

— Proceeding by petitioner (1) for an order declaring the respondent Martin A. Berchenko, an attorney, admitted to practice by this court on March 23, 1977, under the name Martin Allen Berchenko, to be suspended from the practice of law upon his conviction of a "serious crime”, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f). On March 3, 1984, the respondent was convicted in the District Court of Nassau County, upon his plea of guilty, of conspiracy in the sixth degree a class B misdemeanor (Penal Law § 105.00) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree a class A misdemeanor (Penal Law § 220.03); and (2) authorize the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court against Martin A. Berchenko.

Motion by respondent (1) to lift or vacate the automatic suspension from the practice of law which arises upon the conviction for a "serious crime”, assuming that this court deems the conviction to be such a "serious crime”, pending the hearing and determination of any proceeding which may be instituted against respondent as a result thereof and (2) to stay the provisions of this court’s rules (22 NYCRR 691.10 [c] and [d]) relative to the giving of notice by said attorney of his suspension, to his clients (Jacoby & Meyers).

Motion denied. This court finds that the conviction of the *760respondent was for "serious crimes” and he shall remain suspended until further order of this court.

Pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law § 90) the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts is hereby authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court as petitioner against the respondent based upon the acts of professional misconduct which constituted the facts alleged in the criminal proceedings.

Robert H. Straus, Esq., Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Suite 1200, Municipal Building, Brooklyn, New York, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.
Order entered April 27 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01028
- CR
ADOLPH JUNIOR MENJIV AR, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13
- 57185
- U



### O RDER
T he Court ORDERS court reporter Peri Wood to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit nos. 2, 17, 39, and 67, and Defendant’s Exhibit nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, a nd 12.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Peri Wood, official court reporter, 292nd Judicial District, and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Debra Gentile, Appellant, v David A. Levine, Respondent.

Order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated December 20, 1983, affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of Judge Gilman at the Family Court. O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32.2


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Solution Technology
      International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies that to such officer’s knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




DATE:
              April 2, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Michael
              H. PollackMichael
                H. Pollack
              Chief
                Financial Officer
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Illinois

JP Morgan Chase Bank , N.A. )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 02 C 6240

PT Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Corporation Tbk, et al

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs.

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

X other: judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff JP Morgan and against the defendant PT Indah in the amount of

$32,156.331.55; against defendant PT Pabrick in the amount of $21,340,006.22; and against defendant Asia Pulp as

the guarantor in the amount of $53,496,337.77. .

This action was (check one):

’ tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

’ tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

X decided by Judge James F. Holderman on a motion for modification of 

the judgment entered on April 21, 2010.

.

Date: Sep 13, 2010 Michael W. Dobbins, Clerk of Court

 Alyce Mobley Morris

Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:02-cv-06240 Document #: 297 Filed: 09/13/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:7006
BLUEFLY, INC.
                                  JUNE 30, 2003

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bluefly, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Kenneth Seiff,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ E. Kenneth Seiff

E. Kenneth Seiff
Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Bluefly, Inc. and will be retained
by Bluefly, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Case 10-00082 Doc 64 Filed 11/15/10 Entered 11/15/10 23:02:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 10-00082 Doc 64 Filed 11/15/10 Entered 11/15/10 23:02:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Philip R. Hefft, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered March 13, 1984, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott
Sullinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period
ended April 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation.

Date: October 27, 2006



By:

/s/ Scott SullingerName:

Scott SullingerTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
#### WIXTED, Respondent, v. NASSAU ELECTRIC R. CO., Appellant. (Action No. 6.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Thomas Wixted against the Nassau Electric Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the authority of Barnett v. Brooklyn Heights R. Co.. 53 App. Div. 432, 65 N. Y. Supp. 1068, and People v. Brooklyn Heights R. Co., 187 N. Y. 48, 79 N. E. 838.