alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 18 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 18

        Expressing support for prayer at school board meetings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

 Mr. Vitter submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
        the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Expressing support for prayer at school board meetings.

Whereas the freedom to practice religion and to express religious thought is 
        acknowledged to be a fundamental and unalienable right belonging to all 
        individuals;
Whereas the United States was founded on the principle of freedom of religion 
        and not freedom from religion;
Whereas the Framers intended that the First Amendment to the Constitution would 
        prohibit the Federal Government from enacting any law that favors one 
        religious denomination over another, not prohibit any mention of 
        religion or reference to God in civic dialogue;
Whereas in 1983 the Supreme Court held in Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, that 
        the practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer has become part 
        of the fabric of our society and invoking divine guidance on a public 
        body entrusted with making the laws is not a violation of the 
        Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, but rather is simply a 
        tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the people of the 
        Nation;
Whereas voluntary prayer in elected bodies should not be limited to prayer in 
        State legislatures and Congress;
Whereas school boards are deliberative bodies of adults, similar to a 
        legislature in that they are elected by the people, act in the public 
        interest, and hold sessions that are open to the public for voluntary 
        attendance; and
Whereas voluntary prayer by an elected body should be protected under law and 
        encouraged in society because voluntary prayer has become a part of the 
        fabric of our society, voluntary prayer acknowledges beliefs widely held 
        among the people of the Nation, and the Supreme Court has held that it 
        is not a violation of the Establishment Clause for a public body to 
        invoke divine guidance: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes that prayer before school board meetings is 
        a protected act in accordance with the fundamental principles 
        upon which the Nation was founded; and
            (2) expresses support for the practice of prayer at the 
        beginning of school board meetings.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










To the knowledge of each of the undersigned, this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. for the applicable reporting period.










Date:  March 21, 2011                                                          By:           /s/  James A. Luksch


James A. Luksch, Chief Executive Officer





By:           /s/  Eric Skolnik


Eric Skolnik, Chief Financial Officer
# L_2013152EN.01S00301.xml

| 5.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 152/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 152/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, George J. Carter, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form
      10-Q/A of Franklin Street Properties Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


Date: May 26, 2004                  /s/ George J. Carter
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    George J. Carter
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       34
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE COMPUTATION
                     VANGUARD AIRLINES, INC.

                                                                     
                                                           Period From   
                                                         April 24, 1994  
                           Year Ended      Year Ended  (Date of Inception)
                          December 31,    December 31,   to December 31, 
                              1996             1995            1994      
                                                                         
Net Loss                 $(25,808,070)   $(12,195,530)       $(3,442,457)

Weighted 
average number 
of common 
shares outstanding 
during the year     9,056,888                1,796,083            406,533

Add - common 
equivalent shares 
representing shares 
issuable upon the
conversion of Serise 
A Preferred Stock/2/                         1,665,753          1,872,000

Add - common 
equivalent shares
representing shares 
issuable upon the 
conversation of Series 
B Preferred Stock /2/                        3,032,540          1,890,066

Add - common 
equivalent shares
(determined using 
the "treasury stock 
method") representing 
the shares issuable 
upon the exercise
of stock options 
outstanding                                    570,864            567,094

Add - common 
equivalent shares 
(determined using the 
"treasury stock method") 
representing shares 
issuable upon the 
exercise of warrants
outstanding /1/                                330,681            171,684

Weighted average 
number of common 
and common equivalent 
shares outstanding           9,056,888       7,395,921          4,907,377

Net loss per share             $(2.85)         $(1.65)             $(.70)




/1/  In 1995, the computation of loss per share was determined
under the provisions of Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 83.  In 1996, outstanding stock options
and warrants were not considered in the net loss per share
calculation, as their effects are antidilutive.

/2/  Series A and Series B Preferred Stock converted on November
3, 1995 in connection with the closing of the Company's initial
public offering of Common Stock.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

1.  Clayton/National Courier Systems, Inc.
2.  Click Messenger Service, Inc.
3.  Click Messenger Service of N.Y., Inc.
4.  Darobin Freight Forwarding Co. Inc. *
5.  First Choice Courier and Distribution Systems, Inc.
6.  KBD Services, Inc.
7.  Manteca Enterprises, Inc.
8.  National Express Company, Inc.
9.  Olympic Courier Systems, Inc.
10. Regional Express II, Inc.
11. Regional Express III, Inc.
12. Securities Courier Corporation
13. Silver Star Express, Inc.
14. SureWay Air Traffic Corporation
15. SureWay Logistics Corporation

----------
*     Disposed of as part of sale of Assets of Sureway Air Traffic Corporation.


                                       3
Exhibit 32.1

CEO/CFO Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation, respectively,
certify that, to the best of their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation and subsidiary at the dates and for
the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not
be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                |  |                                                                  
|--------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|August 13, 2008 |  | /s/ Robert H. Gilliam, Jr.                                       
|Date            |  | Robert H. Gilliam, Jr., President and Chief Executive
Officer    
|                | 
|August 13, 2008 |  | /s/ Bryan M. Lemley                                              
|Date            |  | Bryan M. Lemley, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16060]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking; Notice of Charter 
Renewal

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA), and after consultation with the General Services 
Administration, the Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation has determined that renewal of the FDIC Advisory Committee 
on Community Banking (Committee) is in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the FDIC by law. 
The Committee has been a successful undertaking by the FDIC and has 
provided valuable feedback to the agency on a broad range of policy 
issues that have a particular impact on community banks throughout the 
United States and the local communities that are served by community 
banks. The Committee will continue to review various issues that may 
include, but not be limited to, examination policies and procedures, 
credit and lending practices, deposit insurance assessments, insurance 
coverage, and regulatory compliance matters to promote the continued 
growth and ability of community banks to extend financial services in 
their respective local markets. The structure and responsibilities of 
the Committee are unchanged from when it was originally established in 
July 2009. The Committee will continue to operate in accordance with 
the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra A. Decker, Committee Management 
Officer of the FDIC, at (202) 898-8748.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. Appendix.

    Dated: July 23, 2021.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-16060 Filed 7-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
#### TIMOTHY HIGGINS, AN INFANT, ETC., PLAINTIFF, AND CHARLES A. HIGGINS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM A. SCHNEIDER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued September 27, 1960

Decided October 10, 1960.

*Mr. Stanley W. Greenfield*argued the cause for the appellant.

*Mr. Edward G. Hillis*argued the cause for the respondent *(Messrs. Harley, Winhelried & Hillis,*attorneys).

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below.

Mr. Chief Justice Weintbaub and Mr. Justice Schettino vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Ereund.

*For affirmance*— Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Ebancis, Pkoctok and Hall — 5.

*For reversal*— Chief Justice Weinteatjb, and Justice Schettino — 2.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HENRY WELSH ROGERS, DECEASED.

September 19, 1960.

*Mr. Israel B. Greene*and *Mr. Robert S. Banlcs*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Clapp & Eisenberg*and *Mr. George S. Fischler*for the respondents.

Denied.
Exhibit 10.5.3

                                    Amendment

      This Amendment is effective as of the signature date of the second party
to sign (the "Effective Date"), and amends the Agreement made as of July 25,
2002 (the "Agreement") by and between Visual Networks of Texas, L.P. ("Systems
Provider") and MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc., for itself and its
Affiliates (collectively, "MCI"). Capitalized terms used but not defined in this
Amendment have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

The parties hereby agree as follows:

1. With respect to Products ordered by MCI after the Effective Date, Paragraph
number 3 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:

      "Payment in full for all Products delivered by Systems Provider pursuant
      to this Agreement, as amended, must be received by Systems Provider within
      thirty (30) calendar days after the Product delivery date. MCI shall be
      entitled to take an additional discount of 2 percent (2%) off of the total
      amount of Systems Provider's invoice for invoices paid in full within
      fifteen (15) calendar days after Product delivery date. If Systems
      Provider does not receive payment when due under this Agreement, as
      amended, Systems Provider shall have no obligation to ship additional
      Products."

2. Paragraph 6 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.

3. Unless explicitly modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement
remain in full force and effect.

4. The parties agree that for all purposes of the Agreement and the
Reseller/Integrator Agreement referred to therein, the corporate name "MCI
WorldCom Network Services, Inc." shall be substituted for "MCI
Telecommunications Corporation" under which MCI was formerly doing business.

      Therefore, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their
duly authorized representatives.

VISUAL NETWORKS                           MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK
OF TEXAS, L.P.                            SERVICES, INC.


By: /s/ Jefferson D. Norton               By: /s/ B. R. Bagby
   ------------------------------            ----------------------------

Name: Jefferson D. Norton                 Name: B. R. Bagby
     ----------------------------              --------------------------

Title: Associate General Counsel          Title:      Director
      ---------------------------               -------------------------

Date: August 28, 2002                     Date:  August 28, 2002
     ----------------------------              --------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Joeger, Appellant.

Levine, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered *945November 9,1983, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of marihuana in the first degree.

In August 1982, a State Police investigator entered into defendant’s 103-acre farm without a warrant and there located two fields where defendant was growing marihuana. Defendant was subsequently indicted on a charge of criminal possession of marihuana in the first degree. Following a suppression hearing, County Court denied defendant’s motion to suppress the marihuana found in the fields. Defendant then pleaded guilty as charged.

On this appeal, defendant contends that the marihuana should have been suppressed as it was the fruit of a warrantless search of an area in which defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy. He argues that the fact that the fields in question were posted with no trespassing signs and were partially fenced evidences his expectation of privacy in those areas and renders the warrantless search thereof violative of the US Constitution 4th Amendment. This contention is meritless.

The same argument was rejected in *Oliver v United States*(466 US 170,104 S Ct 1735) wherein the Supreme Court stated that “no expectation of privacy legitimately attaches to open fields” (p 1742), noting that the presence of fences and no trespassing signs does not alter this rule since they do not “effectively bar the public from viewing open fields in rural areas” (p 1741). The *Oliver*ruling was recently followed by this court in a case factually similar to the instant matter *(People v Gustafson,*101 AD2d 920, 921; *see also, People v Abbott,*105 AD2d 1029,1030). We see no reason to alter that holding here.

Defendant also argues that his sentence of six months’ imprisonment and 4Vfe years’ probation was unduly harsh and excessive. However, the record discloses that this sentence was the result of a plea bargain during which defendant was represented by competent counsel and, further, that this sentence was far less than the maximum authorized by statute (Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [c]). Accordingly, it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in sentencing defendant *(see, People v Saez,*81 AD2d 841, 842).

Judgment affirmed. Main, J. P., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
# C_2020247EN.01001401.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/14

---

Order of the General Court of 20 May 2020 — Nord Stream v Parliament and Council

(Case T-530/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Energy - Internal market in natural gas - Directive (EU) 2019/692 - Addition of Article 49a to Directive 2009/73/EC concerning the adoption of decisions derogating from certain provisions of that directive - Application of Directive 2009/73 to gas lines to or from third countries - Objection to the deadline of 24 May 2020 for granting derogations from the obligations laid down by Directive 2009/73 - No direct concern - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 247/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nord Stream AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Raible, C. von Köckritz and J. von Andreae, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by L. Visaggio, J. Etienne and I. McDowell, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Lo Monaco and S. Boelaert, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Directive (EU) 2019/692 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 amending Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas (OJ 2019 L 117, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Republic of Estonia, by the Republic of Latvia, by the Republic of Lithuania, by the Republic of Poland and by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Republic of Estonia, by the Republic of Latvia, by the Republic of Lithuania, by the Republic of Poland and by the European Commission.

| 3. | Nord Stream AG is ordered to pay the costs of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union, except for those relating to the applications for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Nord Stream AG is ordered to pay the costs of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union, except for those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

| 4. | Nord Stream, the Parliament and the Council, as well as the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Poland and the Commission, are to bear their own costs in relation to the applications for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Nord Stream, the Parliament and the Council, as well as the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Poland and the Commission, are to bear their own costs in relation to the applications for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Young Innovations, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


               /s/ Alfred E. Brennan, Jr.
--------------------------------------------------------
          Alfred E. Brennan, Jr., Director and
                Chief Executive Officer

               /s/ Arthur L. Herbst, Jr.
--------------------------------------------------------
                   Arthur L. Herbst, Jr.,
                          President

                     /s/ Christine R. Boehning
--------------------------------------------------------
                   Christine R. Boehning,
         Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





March 4, 2005

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Young
Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Young Innovations, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Form 10-K.