alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of September 30, 1998, and statements of operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         128,510
<SECURITIES>                                   130,399
<RECEIVABLES>                                  734,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    570,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,563,470
<PP&E>                                       2,666,619
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,056,148)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,660,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,658,903
<BONDS>                                        402,825
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,237
<OTHER-SE>                                   (412,294)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,660,671
<SALES>                                      3,551,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,551,716
<CGS>                                        2,740,751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,740,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,314,444
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             749,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,933,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,933,213)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,933,213)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.06)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CEO/CFO Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation, respectively, certify that, to the best
of their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation and subsidiary at the dates and for
the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)
and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|             |  |  |  |                                                              
|------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|May 13, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert H. Gilliam, Jr.                                   
|Date         |  |  |  | Robert H. Gilliam, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer
|             |  | 
|             |  |  |  | /s/ Bryan M. Lemley                                          
|May 13, 2010 |  |  |  | Bryan M. Lemley, Secretary,                                  
|Date         |  |  |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 9 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the designation of the year of 2011 

as the International Year for People of African Descent. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2011 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. WICKER) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the designation of the 

year of 2011 as the International Year for People of 

African Descent. 

Whereas United Nations Resolution 64/169, adopted by the 

General Assembly on December 18, 2009, designates the 

year 2011 as the ‘‘International Year for People of African Descent’’; 

Whereas the African Diaspora is expansive, spanning across 

the globe from Latin America and the Caribbean to Asia, 

with persons of African descent living on every continent, 

including Europe; 

Whereas the historical bonds and shared experiences that tie 

the African continent with the world must be recalled; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 9 IS 

Whereas the global contributions of people of African descent 

must be recognized as a means of preserving that heritage; 

Whereas the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted Resolution 64/169 with a view to strengthening national actions and regional and international cooperation 

for the benefit of people of African descent in relation 

to— 

(1) the full enjoyment of economic, cultural, social, 

civil, and political rights for people of African descent; 

(2) the participation and integration of people of African descent in all political, economic, social, and cultural aspects of society; and 

(3) the promotion of greater knowledge of, and respect for, the diverse heritage and culture of people of 

African descent; and 

Whereas the Helsinki Final Act resulting from the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe in 1975 

states that ‘‘participating States will respect human 

rights and fundamental freedoms (. . .) for all without 

distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion;’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the goals and ideals of the des4 ignation of the year of 2011 as the International 

5 Year for People of African Descent; 

6 (2) encourages the recognition and celebration 

7 of the collective history and achievements made by 

8 people of African descent; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SCON 9 IS 

1 (3) reaffirms the importance of inclusion and 

2 the full and equal participation of people of African 

3 descent around the world in all aspects of political, 

4 economic, social, and cultural life; 

5 (4) continues to support bilateral and multilat6 eral efforts to promote democracy, human rights, the 

7 rule of law, and the eradication of poverty, hunger, 

8 inequality, and social exclusion; and 

9 (5) reaffirms the commitment of Congress to 

10 address racism, discrimination, and intolerance in 

11 the United States and around the globe. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
The Honor able Samuel H. Ma y s, J r., United S tates District J udg e for the Western District * of Tenne ssee, sitting by

designation. NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 10a0497n.06 No. 09-3165 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OFAP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
STEV EN HOO D , Pe tit ion e r- Ap pe lla

nt,
v. JU LIU S WI LSON , WAR DE N , Respondent-Appe llee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE UN I TE D ST AT ES D I STRI CT CO UR T F OR

TH E N OR TH ERN D IS T R IC T O F O H IO

O PI N I O N

BEFORE: COLE an d McK EAGU E, Circuit Judges; MAYS, Distr ict Judge. * P ER CURIAM . Petitioner Steven Hood appeal s t h e dis trict court’ s denial of his petition for ha beas c orpus. B eca

use Hood’s pe riod of inca rce ration has e x pired, we find the appe al is now moot. See United States v. W altanen , 356 F. App’ x 848, 851 (6th Cir. 2009) (“ I f a prisoner does not
c ha lle ng e theva lid ity

of thec onvic tio n b ut ra

the r on ly c ha lle ng e s his se nte nc e or so me a sp e c t of it, the re quest for r elief is moot once the challeng ed portion of the se ntence has ex pired.” ) (quoting Un ite d Sta te

s v . G old be rg , 239 F. App’ x 993, 994 (6th Cir. 2007)). The sole issue befor e this court is whether H ood’s appe llate co u n s el was inef fec tive for f

ailing to c halleng e his sentenc e of incar cer ation pursuant to State v. Foster , 845 N.E.2d 470 (Ohio 2006). On Fe bruar y 6, 2006, Hood
wa s s en t enced to five year s of incar cer ation, with eligibility for judicial r elea se af

ter ser ving f ourNo. 09-3165

Stephen Hood v . Julius W ilson

- 2 - year s. On Februar

y 24, 2010, Hood s ent a letter to the court stating that he had be en discha rg ed fr om his prison term on Februar y 22, 2010. Be cause he has serve d the challeng ed portion of his sentenc e, his pe tit ion

is DI SM ISSED a s mo ot.
#### Donna Fink et al., Appellants, v Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), entered July 31, 1984, which denied their motion to set aside a jury verdict finding the plaintiff Donna Fink 50% at fault in the happening of the accident and the defendant 50% at fault, and granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prove a prima facie case.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Donna Fink lost her balance and fell as she and a fellow teacher carried a carton through the only aisle of the supply room at the school where they both taught. The plaintiff testified that she lost her balance by kicking a small box, about six inches long and weighing about two ounces. At the time of the incident there were about 10 teachers and a supply room aide in the supply room. The only evidence concerning the length of time the box had been on the floor is that it had not been there when the plaintiff had entered the supply room 15 minutes prior to the incident in which she was injured. After the plaintiffs rested, the defendant moved to dismiss for failure to prove a prima facie case, specifically, the element of notice, actual or constructive. Trial Term reserved *705decision but granted the defendant’s motion after the jury returned a verdict.

The plaintiffs argue that notice is not an element of a prima facie case where the defendant creates the condition which is responsible for the injury. Since the only persons in the supply room when the box appeared in the aisle were the defendant’s employees, the plaintiffs contend that the creating of the condition is to be imputed to the defendant. This rule, however, is limited to situations where the defendant has created the condition by some affirmative act *(see, Cook v Rezende,*32 NY2d 596). The plaintiffs failed to show that the defendant created the condition, therefore they had to establish actual or constructive notice as an element of their prima facie case *(see, Madrid v City of New York,*42 NY2d 1039). The plaintiffs failed to present probative evidence as to the defendant’s actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition; therefore the dismissal of the complaint was proper *(see, Torregrossa v Bohack Corp.,*81 AD2d 884). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Hooper, JJ., concur.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 11981 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus MICHAEL DEXTER LITTLE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21

- cr

- 00103

- RBD

- DCI

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11981 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 03/02/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 11981

Before J ORDAN , L AGOA , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:Thomas Dale, appointed counsel for Michael Little in his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mr. Little and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In his response to Mr. Dale’s motion, Mr. Little file d his own motion for substitution of counsel, asserting a breakdown in communication between himself and Mr. D ale.Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdr aw is GRANTED , and Mr. Little’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED

. Mr. Little’s motion for substitution of counsel is DENIED as moot. To the extent that Mr. Little asserts that Mr. Dale rendered ineffective assistance of counsel, he can raise such claims in a motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. USCA11 Case: 22-11981 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 03/02/2023 Page: 2 of 2
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 277 

Recognizing the month of October 2011 as ‘‘National Principals Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 

Mr. FRANKEN (for himself, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. 

BEGICH, Mr. CARDIN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. WARNER, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the month of October 2011 as ‘‘National 

Principals Month’’. 

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals and the National Association of Elementary School 

Principals have declared the month of October 2011 as 

‘‘National Principals Month’’; 

Whereas principals are educational visionaries, instructional 

and assessment leaders, disciplinarians, community builders, budget analysts, facilities managers, and administrators of legal and contractual obligations; 

Whereas principals work collaboratively with teachers and 

parents to develop and implement a clear mission, high 

curriculum standards, and performance goals; 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 277 ATS 

Whereas principals create school environments that facilitate 

great teaching and learning and continuous school improvement; 

Whereas the vision, actions, and dedication of principals provide the mobilizing force behind any school reform effort; 

and 

Whereas the celebration of ‘‘National Principals Month’’ 

would honor elementary school, middle school, and high 

school principals, and recognize the importance of principals in ensuring that every child has access to a highquality education: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the month of October 2011 as 

3 ‘‘National Principals Month’’; and 

4 (2) honors the contribution of principals in the 

5 elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools 

6 of our Nation by supporting the goals and ideals of 

7 ‘‘National Principals Month’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael N. Murdock, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL N. MURDOCK                                              
|Michael N. Murdock Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

Dated: May 4, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6250

JAMES D. BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Director of the Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-99-862-2) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.James D. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:James D. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Angelone , No. CA-99-862-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case: 1:01-cv-01483 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1
Case: 1:01-cv-01483 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:2
Case: 1:01-cv-01483 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:3
Case: 1:01-cv-01483 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:4
Case: 1:01-cv-01483 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:5
Case: 1:01-cv-01483 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/01/01 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:6
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rocco Buchicchio, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Edelstein, J.), rendered May 30, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing four indeterminate terms of imprisonment of not less than 7 years and not more than 14 years, all to run concurrently.

*730Judgment affirmed.

By not moving in the court of first instance to withdraw his plea or vacate his conviction, defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of sufficiency of his plea allocution *(see, People v Hoke,*62 NY2d 1022; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). A reversal in the interest of justice is not warranted inasmuch as defendant’s plea was the product of plea bargaining freely entered into by the defendant, who is a second felony offender, with the advice of counsel, under which the plea and sentence were in full satisfaction of a 21-count indictment charging him with robbery in the first degree (four counts), grand larceny in the third degree (nine counts), criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (five counts), attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts), and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree *(see, People v Nasti,*90 AD2d 507; *People v Ebron,*87 AD2d 653). This is especially true if one notes that even if defendant were only convicted of four counts of robbery in the second degree, he still would have faced a potentially much longer sentence than was actually imposed *(see,*Penal Law § 70.04 [3] [b]).

The absence of a psychiatric evaluation in the presentence report did not make the sentence imposed illegal under CPL 390.30 (3). No such evaluation was ordered by the Trial Judge. The presentence report did incorporate the presentence report in defendant’s 1980 conviction for robbery in the third degree, and the Judge in that case had ordered a report which was never received. In this situation, it was not error to impose sentence without a psychiatric evaluation. We note that there is no evidence that such an evaluation was critical to a fair sentencing determination and defendant did not raise the issue of his psychological health prior to this appeal.

Finally, defendant’s sentence was not excessive in view of the fact that he was a second felony offender, who, according to the presentence report, was a "continued threat to society”. The Trial Judge properly exercised his broad discretion in imposing sentence and no extraordinary circumstances exist which would warrant this court substituting its own discretion for that of the Trial Judge in the interest of justice *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. "Under the circumstances of this case, defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive” *(People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816, 817). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street
Properties Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, George J. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


Date: July 30, 2004                   /s/ George J. Carter
                                      ----------------------
                                      George J. Carter
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       33