alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Carl Hayden Bee Research Center: Tucson, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Information
                        Africanized Honey Bees
                                    Bee Safety
                                    Online Books
                                    Other NewsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Tucson, Arizona Carl Hayden Bee Research Center Docs





- Official Disclaimer

Aboutusheadline bar The mission of the Carl Hayden Bee Research Center (CHBRC) is to conduct research to optimize the health of honey bee colonies, through improved nutrition and control of Varroa mites, in order to maximize production of honey bee pollinated crops.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street
Properties Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, John G. Demeritt Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


Date: May 6, 2005              /s/ John G. Demeritt
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John G. Demeritt
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Juan Marte, Respondent.

—Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Brennan,. J.), dated January 29, 1985, as granted that branch of defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the indictment, with leave to re-present the case to another Grand Jury.

Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, that branch of defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the indictment denied, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings including the determination of the remaining branches of defendant’s omnibus motion.

The evidence before the Grand Jury, including the nature, contents, and particular location of the defendant’s personal documents which were found in the apartment, established a prima facie case that defendant unlawfully possessed the requisite amount of drugs and the firearm as charged in the indictment (CPL 190.65 [1]; 70.10; *People v Mayo,*36 NY2d 1002, 1004; *People v Robertson,*61 AD2d 600, *affd*48 NY2d 993). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Hooper, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40968 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAVIER GONZALEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-304-1

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Javier Gonzalez-Hernandez appeals from his conviction of illegal reentry following deportation. Gonzalez contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” sentencing-enhancement provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are facially unconstitutional because Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), has been undercut by later Supreme Court opinions. Gonzalez concedes that his argument is foreclosed by existing precedent, but he raises it to preserve itNo. 04-40968 -2- for further review. Gonzalez contends that Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), is applicable to his sentence if Almendarez-Torres is overruled. Gonzalez’s Almendarez-Torres contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Gonzalez contends that his sentencing under the formerly mandatory Sentencing Guidelines was plainly erroneous and reversible pursuant to United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Gonzalez cannot demonstrate reversible plain error because he cannot show that the district court’s error affected his sentence. See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d 728, 732-33 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556). AFFIRMED.
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 8 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Stephen M. Case as a 

citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the resigna7 tion of Phillip Frost of Florida is filled by the appointment 

8 of Stephen M. Case of Virginia. The appointment is for 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 8 RFH 

1 a term of 6 years, effective on the date of enactment of 

2 this joint resolution. 

Passed the Senate March 15, 2011. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Singletary, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lagaña, J.), rendered December 13, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The trial court’s refusal to grant defense counsel’s request for an adjournment on the first morning of the trial did not result in a denial of defendant’s right to a fair trial, where the request was made some three years after defendant was arraigned, and the trial progressed slowly in order to give defense counsel an opportunity to interview a potential alibi witness.

*605Neither did the court’s *Sandoval*ruling, allowing questioning only as to the fact that defendant had been previously convicted of robbery in the third degree and rape in the first degree, deprive defendant of a fair trial. Questioning regarding a prior crime is not automatically precluded simply because it is similar to the crime charged *(People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282). Crimes such as rape and robbery are highly probative as to a defendant’s willingness to place his self-interest ahead of principle or of the interest of society *(People v Bennette,*56 NY2d 142; *People v Williams,*108 AD2d 767).

Furthermore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding that the sentence in the instant case was to run consecutively to the sentence defendant was still serving at the time this judgment was rendered.

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either without merit or not preserved for our review. Lazer, J. P., Rubin, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
#### RAIFE, Respondent, v. SWITZER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Philip R. Raife against Andrew Switzer.

No opinion. Order setting aside verdict and granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial affirmed, with costs.
# Official Journal L 77I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 077I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6220 March 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 077I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6220 March 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2019/420 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2019 amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2019/420 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2019 amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, George J. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.













Date:  November
      4, 2008
            /s/ George J.
      Carter
              George
      J. Carter
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Davis, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered on January 4, 1984, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Fein, Milonas, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00091

- CR

James Daniel Harris

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 89th D istrict Court

o f Wichita County (49,178

- C )

April 10, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in t he trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

/s/ Lee Gabriel

By

_________________________________ Justice Lee Gabriel
#### County of Erie, Respondent, v Abbott-Ridge Roads, G.M. 52 A & 137 Parcels No. 5 & 5A, Mobil Oil Corporation, Appellant.

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The critical issue on this appeal is whether respondent Mobil Oil Corporation is entitled to conse*972quential damages as a result of the partial taking of its property by petitioner County of Erie for purposes of widening Abbott and Ridge Roads in the City of Lackawanna. The court determined that it was not, and we agree.

The taking required new curb cuts on both Abbott Road and Ridge Road to provide for access to respondent’s high-volume service station. Mobil argues that the relocation of the curb cuts interfered with the station’s traffic pattern and required it to make major renovations at the site, including moving pump islands, underground gasoline tanks and the garage building. A review of the record, however, shows that the curb cuts on Abbott Road did not change in location and the changes on Ridge Road were minimal. Respondent offered no proof that the changes required by the taking negatively affected access to its property by customers seeking to use the gas pumps or otherwise desiring to avail themselves of the station’s services. Damages resulting merely from circuity of access are noncompensable *(Selig v State of New York,*10 NY2d 34, 39; *see also, Northern Lights Shopping Center v State of New York,*20 AD2d 415, 419, *affd*15 NY2d 688, *cert denied*382 US 826). It is only when access to the remaining property is unsuitable that compensability follows *(Argersinger v State of New York,*32 AD2d 708, 709).

As to direct damages, the court, without explanation, awarded $11,037.50 to respondent. While the court should have explained the reasons for its determination, the failure here to do so does not require reversal. The county’s expert opined that Mobil’s direct damages were $12,200, while Mobil’s expert put damages at $10,150. The award was thus well within the range of testimony and should not be disturbed *(Matter of City of New York [Reiss],*55 NY2d 885, 886; *Matter of Village of Hilton v Edelman,*83 AD2d 767, *appeal withdrawn*55 NY2d 748). (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J. — condemnation.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                          1,033,611
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   463,533
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     12,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,509,144
<PP&E>                          210,589
<DEPRECIATION>                  12,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,918,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           14,728
<BONDS>                         2,201,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1,000
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,918,590
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                45,885
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                133,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              58,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (146,601)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (146,601)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (146,601)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (146.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (146.60)



</TABLE>
#### Kwame ASAFO-ADJEI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST SAVINGS MORTGAGE CORPORATION; Andrew Mactigue; George Bonney, Dr. Hal J. Epstein; Wilshire Credit Corporation; Green Tree Servicing, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and Homecomings Financial; GMAC Mortgage LLC, Defendants.

No. 11-1179.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 25, 2011.

Kwame Asafo-Adjei, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas John McKee, Jr., Williams Mullen, McLean, Virginia, William Lewis Stauffer, Jr., Williams Mullen, Newport News, Virginia; Thomas Althauser, Eccleston & Wolf PC, Hanover, Maryland, Nathaniel Kenneth Risch, Eccleston *&*Wolf PC, Washington, D.C.; James Burton Travis, Bierman Geesing Ward & Wood, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland; Brian L. Moffet, Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, Baltimore, Maryland; John Curtis Lynch, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kwame Asafo-Adjei appeals the district court’s order dismissing Asafo-Adjei’s amended complaint with prejudice, and entering costs in favor of all Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Asafo-Adjei v. First Sav. Mortg. Corp.,*No. 8:09-cv-02184-RWT, 2011 WL 344613 (D.Md. Feb. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
# Official Journal C 394/29 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 394 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6429 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 394

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6429 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 394/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 August 2021 to 31 August 2021(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2021/C 394/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 August 2021 to 31 August 2021(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 9 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 394/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 August 2021 to 31 August 2021(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2021/C 394/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 August 2021 to 31 August 2021(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

9

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Charles W. Schroeder, Elsie

A. Schroeder s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 12, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00167

- CV

STEPHENS & JOHNSON OPERATING CO.; Henry W. Breyer, III, Trust; CAH, Ltd.

- MOPI for Capital Account; CAH, Ltd.

- Stivers Capital Account; CAH, Ltd.

- Wiegand Resources Capital

Account Wiegand Resources; C.T. Carden; Myrl W. Deitch Trust; E.R. Godbout Family Tru, Appellant s

v.

Charles W. SCHROEDER , Elsie A. Schroeder Schn eider, Hollis London, Terry Mengers Reel, Ted Mengers, Debbie Mengers Quates, August H. Setinmeyer, Carole Schroeder Miller, James M. Schroeder, Sally Schroeder Tinanus, James E. Schroeder, Sue Schroeder Stanfo, Appellee s

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC

- 04

- 143 Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Motion for Extension of Ti me to File Brief is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Lu z Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         July 29, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 13, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 712 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-113, CP2021-115.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-16108 Filed 7-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P