alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 17, 2019

No. 04-18-00581-CR

Justin LUNA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9367

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due December 14, 2018, but was not filed. This court 

notified appellant’s counsel of the deficiency on December 18, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(b)(2). On December 28, 2018, appellant responded by filing a motion for extension of time, 

requesting an additional thirty days in which to file appellant’s brief. The court granted the 

motion and ordered appellant to file the brief in this court on or before January 14, 2019, thirty 

days from the original due date. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time to file the 

brief has been filed.

We therefore ORDER appellant’s appointed appellate counsel, Mr. Pat Montgomery, to 

file appellant’s brief in this court on or before February 13, 2019. If neither the brief nor an 

extension of time to file the brief is filed in this court on or before the date ordered, the court will 

order the appeal abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether 

appellant or appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal. 

We further order the clerk of this court to serve this order on counsel by first class 

United States mail and by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to 

addressee only, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of January, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

              Statement Regarding Computation Of Per Share Earnings

                     TB Wood's Corporation And Subsidiaries

                                 January 3, 1997


                                                                         1994         1995         1996
                                                                         ----         ----         ----


NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE
<S>                                                                 <C>          <C>          <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding ...........    3,375,000    3,375,000    5,515,000
Shares issued upon assumed exercise of outstanding warrants ....      375,000      375,000            0
Shares issued upon assumed exercise of outstanding stock options            0       60,000       85,000
                                                                   ----------   ----------   ----------
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding ....................................................    3,750,000    3,810,000    5,600,000
                                                                   ----------   ----------   ----------
Income before extraordinary item ...............................        3,916        4,599        5,945
Extraordinary item .............................................            0            0       (1,305)
                                                                   ----------   ----------   ----------
Net  income ....................................................        3,916        4,599        4,640
                                                                   ==========   ==========   ==========
Net (loss) Income per common share:
Before extraordinary item ......................................         1.04         1.21         1.06
Extraordinary item .............................................         0.00         0.00        (0.23)
                                                                   ----------   ----------   ----------
Net Income .....................................................         1.04         1.21          .83
                                                                   ==========   ==========   ==========

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-KSB  FOR  THE  YEAR  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      181763
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                60524
<ALLOWANCES>                                  3026
<INVENTORY>                                  15715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            279068
<PP&E>                                       68631
<DEPRECIATION>                               48293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              299406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       132566
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     30564
<OTHER-SE>                                  136275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                299406
<SALES>                                     538489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            538489
<CGS>                                       490742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1093020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (115461)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (741)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (753224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (753224)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.25)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-
OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 31.1



I, Nicholas Alexander, certify that

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Apiva Ventures Ltd.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact.
 necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
 information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control
over financial reporting.

July 12, 2007

_/s/ Nicholas Alexander_________
Nicholas Alexander
Secretary and Director
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Guam Industrial Services, Inc., 

d/b/a Guam Shipyard 

Under Contract No. 000000-00-0-0000 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59075 

David J. Taylor, Esq. 

Montgomery Fazzone & Taylor PLLC 

Washington, DC 

David B. Dixon, Esq. 

Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC 

Washington, DC 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Stephanie Cates-Harman, Esq. 

Assistant Director 

John Noel, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The appeal has been withdrawn. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's 

docket with prejudice. 

Dated: 12 February 2014 

~ Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59075, Appeal of Guam Industrial 

Services, Inc., d/b/a Guam Shipyard, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (40)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,419
<PP&E>                                             768
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (521)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       (150)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,822
<SALES>                                          1,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,224
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (24)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (24)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (24)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
1 The HONORABLE SARAH W. HAYS, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-2641

___________ Terry L. Gerber, in propria persona, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 13, 2000 Filed: April 21, 2000

___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges

___________ PER CURIAM. Terry L. Gerber appeals the district court & s 1 grant of summary judgment for the United States in this injunctive-relief and quiet-title action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that the district court properly granted the United States summary judgment for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
10.19
 
 Director Fee
Arrangements
 
 Fees for the
non-employee directors of Imperial Capital Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for
2009 will continue to be $1,000 per Board or board committee meeting attended,
plus a monthly retainer of $2,250.  Individual directors may also
receive honorariums for additional work performed on behalf of the
Company.  The honorariums paid to directors for 2008 were as follows:
(i) an honorarium of $7,500 to Director Robert Reed for his active assistance
with legislative and audit committee matters during 2008; (ii) an honorarium of
$5,000 to Director Jeffrey Lipscomb for his Chairmanship of the Compensation
Committee and active assistance with compensation matters; (iii) an honorarium
of $15,000 to Director Hirotaka Oribe for his extensive work with the Executive
Committee; and (iv) an honorarium of $5,000 to Director Sandor Mayuga for his
Chairmanship of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee and active
assistance in corporate governance matters.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street
Properties Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Barbara J. Corinha, Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
(equivalent of Chief Financial Officer), Treasurer and Secretary of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


Dated:  August 13 ,2003                /s/ Barbara J. Corinha
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Barbara J. Corinha
                                       Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
                                       (equivalent of Chief Financial Officer),
                                       Treasurer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Franklin Street Properties Corp. and will be retained by Franklin
Street Properties Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Merdy, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), rendered June 29, 1983, convicting him of three counts of grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be said that *682the trial court erred in denying, without a hearing, defendant’s oral application for assigned counsel, as defendant failed to set forth a sufficient basis to show that his representation by retained counsel was inadequate or ineffective.

This is no indication that defense counsel handled the case in other than a competent and professional manner and defendant did not state any basis for dissatisfaction with his attorney other than such attorney’s prior motion for leave to withdraw, which had been denied *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
# C_2021310EN.01002001.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Lucaccioni v Commission

(Case T-316/19) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Social security - Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Common rules on the insurance of officials against the risk of accident and of occupational disease - Occupational disease - Article 9 - Claim for medical expenses - Article 23 - Consulting another doctor - Refusal to bring the matter before the medical committee pursuant to Article 22 - Failure to apply, by analogy, Article 22(1), second subparagraph - Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint - Application of the law ratione temporis)

(2021/C 310/23)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Arnaldo Lucaccioni (San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy) (represented by: E. Bonanni, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

ACTION brought under Article 270 TFUE, seeking, first, the annulment of the Commission decision of 2 August 2018 rejecting the applicant’s requests of 23 March and 8 June 2018 to bring the matter before the medical committee pursuant to Article 22 of the Common rules on the insurance of officials of the European Communities against the risk of accident and of occupational disease and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Arnaldo Lucaccioni to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Arnaldo Lucaccioni to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.

---
# Official Journal C 366/10 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 366 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6410 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 366

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6410 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 366/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 366/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 82E/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2014.082.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 82E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5721 March 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2014.082.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 82E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5721 March 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2014/C 082E/01 | Position (EU) No 3/2014 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sound level of motor vehicles and of replacement silencing systems, and amending Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directive 70/157/EECAdopted by the Council on 20 February 2014 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2014/C 082E/01

Position (EU) No 3/2014 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sound level of motor vehicles and of replacement silencing systems, and amending Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directive 70/157/EECAdopted by the Council on 20 February 2014

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### HAWKINS v. SMITH.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Appeal—Judgment by Default.

A judgment by default is not appealable.

Appeal from Suffolk county court.

Action by Thomas L. Hawltins against Alonzo E. Smith to recover the sum of $267.45 for work, labor, and services rendered to.,defendant from March 1, 1891, to February 1, 1895. Defendant answered by general denial, and both plaintiff and defendant serve notice of trial. At the hearing, counsel for defendant moved for a postponement, which was denied, whereupon plaintiff took judgment by default, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and DYKMAN and PRATT, JJ.

Elliott J. Smith, for appellant.

George H. Furman, for respondent.

PRATT, J.

No principle is better settled than that no appeal lies from a judgment taken by default. Code, § 1294; Avery v. Woodin, 44 Hun, 269. The defendant’s remedy was to move to open his default. The recital that two justices of the sessions were present with the county judge, and took no part in the decision, does not invalidate the judgment. The proceeding was entitled in the county court, the county judge was present, and defendant has appealed from a judgment of the county court. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### THOUSAND ISLAND PARK ASS’N, Appellant, v. GRIDLEY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898)

Action by Thousand Island Park Association against Helen M. Gridley.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 44 N. Y. Supp. 1130; 47 N. Y. Supp. 1150; and 49 N. Y. Supp. 722.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

United States
Plaintiff,
v. 02 CR 944-4

Shikila Blount,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Following a hearing as to the possible revocation or
modification of the terms of supervised release for defendant
Shikila Blount, it is hereby ordered:

1. Defendant’s conditions of supervised release are
modified to require her to surrender to the Salvation Army
Community Confinement Center as soon as space becomes available,
for a term of four months.

2, Ali other conditions of supervised release shall remain
in effect.

3. Defendant, who was taken into custody pursuant to a
bench warrant, is ordered to be released forthwith.

Bee - 27, 2006 Che. OS cole

Milton I, Shadur
Senior United States District Judge