alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF NUTRITION MEDICAL, INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,553,955
<SECURITIES>                                 1,671,596
<RECEIVABLES>                                  356,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                        31
<INVENTORY>                                    460,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,039
<PP&E>                                         182,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,208,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          509,078
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,989,217
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,289,981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,208,314
<SALES>                                      2,402,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,402,267
<CGS>                                        1,550,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,690,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (83,932)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (759,012)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (759,012)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (759,012)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 36 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 36

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
    Relations Board relating to representation election procedures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2012

  Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
Blunt, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Burr, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Coats, Mr. Coburn, Mr. 
 Cochran, Ms. Collins, Mr. Corker, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Crapo, Mr. DeMint, 
   Mr. Graham, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Heller, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. 
    Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Johnson of 
Wisconsin, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Lee, Mr. Lugar, Mr. McCain, Mr. McConnell, Mr. 
 Moran, Mr. Paul, Mr. Portman, Mr. Risch, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Rubio, Mr. 
Sessions, Mr. Shelby, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Thune, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Vitter, and 
 Mr. Wicker) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
 twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
    Relations Board relating to representation election procedures.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to 
representation election procedures (published at 76 Fed. Reg. 80138 
(December 22, 2011)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Presidential Documents

38901 

Federal Register 

Vol. 86, No. 138 

Thursday, July 22, 2021 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of July 20, 2021 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Lebanon 

On August 1, 2007, by Executive Order 13441, the President declared a 

national emergency with respect to Lebanon pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) to deal with the 

unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy 

of the United States constituted by the actions of certain persons to undermine Lebanon’s legitimate and democratically elected government or democratic institutions; to contribute to the deliberate breakdown in the rule 

of law in Lebanon, including through politically motivated violence and 

intimidation; to reassert Syrian control or contribute to Syrian interference 

in Lebanon; or to infringe upon or undermine Lebanese sovereignty. Such 

actions contribute to political and economic instability in that country and 

the region. 

Certain ongoing activities, such as Iran’s continuing arms transfers to 

Hizballah—which include increasingly sophisticated weapons systems—serve 

to undermine Lebanese sovereignty, contribute to political and economic 

instability in the region, and continue to constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United 

States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on August 1, 2007, 

must continue in effect beyond August 1, 2021. Therefore, in accordance 

with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Lebanon 

declared in Executive Order 13441. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

July 20, 2021. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15808 

Filed 7–21–21; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F1–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
**EXHIBIT 12.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Dr. Werner Brandt, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of SAP AG;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for thecompany and have: a. Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, orcaused such disclosurecontrols and procedures tobe designed under oursupervision, to ensure thatmaterial informationrelating to the company,including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within thoseentities, particularlyduring the period in whichthis report is beingprepared;  b. Designed such internalcontrol over financialreporting, or caused suchinternal control overfinancial reporting to bedesigned under oursupervision, to providereasonable assuranceregarding the reliability offinancial reporting and thepreparation of financialstatements for externalpurposes in accordance withgenerally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectivenessof the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures andpresented in this report ourconclusions about theeffectiveness of thedisclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by thisreport based on suchevaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report anychange in the company’sinternal control overfinancial reporting thatoccurred during the periodcovered by the annual reportthat has materiallyaffected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect,the company’s internalcontrol over financialreporting; and 5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function): a. All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: April 2, 2008    Name:  Dr. Werner Brandt               Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Awards & Facilities hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE: 

Tuesday, August 3, 2021, from 10:45-11:45 a.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda of the teleconference is: Committee Chair's Opening Remarks; approval of Prior Minutes; Action Item: Rubin Observatory Management Reserve; Action Item: Arecibo Observatory Clean-up Costs Award; Committee Chair's Closing Remarks.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​notices.jsp#sunshine.*                         Please refer to the National Science Board website                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for general information.                    

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2021-16104 Filed 7-23-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### Kendrick D. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Harold A. ATKINSON, Food Service MGRIV at Middleton Unit, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-10158

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 28, 2011.

Kendrick D. Green, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kendrick D. Green, Texas prisoner # 1041383, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against food service manager Harold Atkinson. Green asserts that the prison system failed to screen food properly for foreign objects and that Atkinson’s deliberate indifference to a known risk violated Green’s right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Green suggests that the prison had a duty to sift the food before preparing it. He further suggests that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) is liable because it is responsible for providing safety training to the inmates who prepare food. Insofar as he argues that anyone but Atkinson is liable, we previously affirmed the dismissal of the prison’s warden, assistant warden, and other food service employees. The TDCJ is not a named defendant.

Given an opportunity upon remand to cure the inadequacy of his claim against Atkinson, Green failed to allege facts related to any other incident in which an inmate was injured by a foreign object in the food. His sole allegation that a security guard knew of an incident when pebbles were found in prison beans does not support a finding that Atkinson knowingly disregarded a substantial risk that an inmate would bite into or ingest a foreign object. The security guard did not indicate that Atkinson was aware of the pebbles. In a § 1983 suit, “[a]bsent vicarious liability, each Government official ... is only liable for his or her own misconduct.” *Ashcroft v. Iqbal,*556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). Because Green was unable upon remand to remedy the insufficient factual allegations against Atkinson, the district court’s dis*916missal of the claim was proper. *See id.; George v. King,*837 F.2d 705, 707 (5th Cir.1988) (holding single incident of food poisoning did not amount to a violation of prisoners’ constitutional rights).

Green also addresses the merits of new claims he attempted to add to his complaint upon remand. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend. *See Boyd v. United States,*861 F.2d 106, 108 (5th Cir.1988).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS                 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997    
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997  
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1 
<CASH>                                             9,569 
<SECURITIES>                                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      2,174 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0 
<INVENTORY>                                            0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0 
<PP&E>                                           803,904 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    48,925 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   788,222 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0 
<BONDS>                                          445,441 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0 
<COMMON>                                               0 
<OTHER-SE>                                       312,442 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     788,222 
<SALES>                                                0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  58,600 
<CGS>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     19,169 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  14,850 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                15,402 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   14,402 
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               14,402 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (1,500)
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      12,902   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .53
                                               

</TABLE>
# C_2021452EN.01004701.xml

| 8.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 452/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 452/47

---

Order of the General Court of 7 September 2021 — Bunzl and Others v Commission

(Case T-475/19) (1)

(2021/C 452/60)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.

---
#### In the Matter of Samuel Sheppard, Appellant, v Eugene S. LeFevre, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

— Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Shea, J.), entered May 16, 1985 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR *868article 78, to annul determinations of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, an inmate at Clinton Correctional Facility, was found guilty in separate disciplinary proceedings of violating certain institutional regulations. Petitioner appealed these dispositions to respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services on October 15, 1984. The dispositions were affirmed in separate decisions dated December 27, 1984. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging such decisions. Special Term dismissed the proceeding and this appeal by petitioner ensued.

The only issue raised on this appeal is that the decisions of the Commissioner were not timely according to his own Department’s regulations. The regulation at issue provides: "Any inmate shall have the right to appeal the disposition of any superintendent’s hearing, to which he was a party, to the commissioner within 30 days of receipt of the disposition. The commissioner or his designee shall issue a decision within 60 days of receipt of the appeal” (7 NYCRR 254.8). A representative of the Department of Correctional Services acknowledged that the appeals were received on October 23, 1984 and that the regulation thereby required decisions by December 24, 1984. The decisions were actually issued on December 27, 1984. Respondents alleged in their answer that the decisions were made on December 21, 1984, but that a personnel shortage resulted in a delay in typing. Case law interpreting statutory time limits on the action of administrative agencies has distinguished between mandatory time limits and those which are merely directory *(see, Matter of Sarkisian Bros. v State Div. of Human Rights,*48 NY2d 816, 817-818; *Matter of 400 Delaware Ave. Prop. Co. v State of New York Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*105 AD2d 1046). The same analysis should be applied to time limits imposed by regulations. Here, since the regulation simply provides for a time limit without any sort of limitation on action after the expiration thereof, such time limit must be construed as directory *(Matter of 400 Delaware Ave. Prop. Co. v State of New York Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, supra,*pp 1046-1047) and the Department will be ousted of jurisdiction only where substantial prejudice is demonstrated *(Matter of Sarkisian Bros. v State Div. of Human Rights, supra,*p 818). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the three-day delay by the Department in issuing the decisions caused him substantial prejudice. Therefore, Special Term properly dismissed the proceeding.

*869Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
#### HURLOCK, Appellant, v. MAKEVER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 22, 1907.)

Action by George D. Hurlock against Sanford Makever and others. E. V. Abbott, for appellant. J. C. Lenney, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Patriot Bank Corp.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-97307, No. 333-13981 and No. 33 62123) on Form S-8 of Patriot Bank Corp. of
our report dated January 20, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balan sheets
of Patriot Bank Corp. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of incon shareholders' equity, cash flows, and
comprehensive income for each of the years in the three-year period end December
31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form
10-K of Patriot Bank Co Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivati Instruments and
Hedging Activities and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Oth Intangible Assets.

KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 12, 2003

                                        1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       44
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (44)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (44)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (44)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>