alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 163/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 163 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6213 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 163

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6213 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2019/C 163/01 | Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 3 April 2019 on the implementing rules on the restriction of certain data subject rights in relation to the transfer of personal data by the European Parliament to national authorities in the context of criminal or financial investigations | 1 |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 163/02 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2019/C 163/01

Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 3 April 2019 on the implementing rules on the restriction of certain data subject rights in relation to the transfer of personal data by the European Parliament to national authorities in the context of criminal or financial investigations

1

European Commission

2019/C 163/02

Euro exchange rates

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 163/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9324 — ALSO/ABC Data) (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 163/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9324 — ALSO/ABC Data) (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM    
10-QSB REPORT OF OVM INTERNATIONAL HOLDING CORP. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED 
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000         
<CURRENCY>                                   RENMINBI YUAN         
                                           
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998        
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998      
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998      
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       8.27      
<CASH>                                              25,377      
<SECURITIES>                                             0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                      127,333      
<ALLOWANCES>                                        13,076      
<INVENTORY>                                         26,063      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   240,391      
<PP&E>                                              20,205      
<DEPRECIATION>                                       6,805      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     265,466      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              175,726      
<BONDS>                                                  0      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0      
<PREFERRED>                                              0      
<COMMON>                                                10      
<OTHER-SE>                                          59,335      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       265,466      
<SALES>                                            124,381      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   128,985      
<CGS>                                               92,424      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      123,439      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,870      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,676      
<INCOME-TAX>                                           653      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,023      
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0      
<CHANGES>                                                0      
<NET-INCOME>                                           211      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.018      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.018      
                                                                
                                              

</TABLE>
#### E. W. BLISS CO., Respondent, v. ARMSTRONG, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by the E. W. Bliss Company against Frank C. Armstrong.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Order entered November 29, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00760-CR

MARCUS DEWAYNE WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1675985-I

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s second motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief. 

We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before January 4, 2019. If 

appellant’s brief is not filed by January 4, 2019, this appeal may be abated for the trial court to 

make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
K:\Heather\Certificate of Service of Final Report.doc 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

WESTER DIVISION 

This is to certify that a copy of the Trustee’s Final Report has been mailed to the 

debtor and the debtor’s attorney. 

Dated at Rockford, IL on: 9/17/2010 By /s/Heather M. Fagan 

Case 10-70104 Doc 35 Filed 09/22/10 Entered 09/22/10 13:03:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
IIA 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 45 

Amending title 36, United States Code, to designate June 19 as ‘‘Juneteenth 

Independence Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2012 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CARDIN, Ms. 

LANDRIEU, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mrs. BOXER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WEBB, Mr. NELSON

of Florida, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Amending title 36, United States Code, to designate June 

19 as ‘‘Juneteenth Independence Day’’. 

Whereas news of the end of slavery did not reach the frontier 

of the United States, and in particular the Southwestern 

States, for more than 21⁄2 years after President Abraham 

Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, and months after the conclusion of the Civil 

War; 

Whereas, on June 19, 1865, Union soldiers led by Major 

General Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston, Texas, 

with news that the Civil War had ended and that the 

slaves were free; 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 45 IS 

Whereas African Americans who had been slaves in the 

Southwest celebrated June 19, commonly known as 

‘‘Juneteenth Independence Day’’, as the anniversary of 

their emancipation; 

Whereas African Americans from the Southwest continue the 

tradition of celebrating Juneteenth Independence Day as 

inspiration and encouragement for future generations; 

Whereas for more than 145 years, Juneteenth Independence 

Day celebrations have honored African-American freedom 

while encouraging self-development and respect for all 

cultures; and 

Whereas the faith and strength of character demonstrated by 

former slaves remain an example for all people of the 

United States, regardless of their background, religion, or 

race: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JUNE 19 AS JUNETEENTH 

4 INDEPENDENCE DAY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 36, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘§ 145. Juneteenth Independence Day 

9 ‘‘(a) DESIGNATION.—June 19 is Juneteenth Inde10 pendence Day. 

11 ‘‘(b) PROCLAMATION.—The President is requested to 

12 issue each year a proclamation calling on State and local 

13 governments and the people of the United States to obVerDate Mar 15 2010 18:59 Jun 20, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ45.IS SJ45

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SJ 45 IS 

1 serve Juneteenth Independence Day with appropriate 

2 ceremonies, programs, and activities.’’. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

4 for chapter 1 of title 36, United States Code, is amended 

5 by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘145. Juneteenth Independence Day.’’. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal L 293/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.293.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 293 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5210 November 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.293.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 293

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5210 November 2009

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | European Parliament |
| | | 2009/801/EC, Euratom |
| | * | Final adoption of amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2009 | 1 |
| | | 2009/802/EC, Euratom |
| | * | Final adoption of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2009 | 35 |
| | | 2009/803/EC, Euratom |
| | * | Final adoption of amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2009 | 61 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

BUDGETS

European Parliament

2009/801/EC, Euratom

*

Final adoption of amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2009

1

2009/802/EC, Euratom

*

Final adoption of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2009

35

2009/803/EC, Euratom

*

Final adoption of amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2009

61

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euros unless otherwise indicated.Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street
Properties Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, John G. Demeritt, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  October 31, 2006                   /s/ John G. Demeritt
                                          --------------------------
                                          John G. Demeritt
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Case: 1:02-cv-03120 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/02 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cv-03120 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/02 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:2
Case: 1:02-cv-03120 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/02 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:3
Case: 1:02-cv-03120 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/02 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:4
Case: 1:02-cv-03120 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/02 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:5
Case: 1:02-cv-03120 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/02 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:6
Case: 1:02-cv-03120 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/02 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:7
Case: 1:02-cv-03120 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/02 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:8
Case: 1:02-cv-03120 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/02 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:9
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE ANGEL GALAVIZ, a.k.a. Jose

Galaviz,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50319

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00595-AG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2011** 

Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Angel Galaviz appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month

sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation,

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

FILED

OCT 03 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50319

(1967), Galaviz’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief,

along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the

appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Galaviz waived his right to appeal his sentence with the exception of the

court’s calculation of his criminal history category. Our independent review of the

record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no

arguable grounds for relief as to the defendant’s conviction and indicates that the

appeal waiver is operative. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the sentence in

part. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000). With

regard to the court’s calculation of the criminal history category, our independent

review of the record discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal, and

we affirm.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062

(9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it

delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). See United
3 10-50319

States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte

to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part; REMANDED to correct the

judgment.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 384 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 384

  Designating the first Tuesday in March as ``National Public Higher 
                            Education Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2012

 Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Gillibrand) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the first Tuesday in March as ``National Public Higher 
                            Education Day''.

Whereas the economic strength of the United States and its ability to create 
        jobs and compete globally requires a skilled workforce educated for a 
        21st century economy;
Whereas according to the Department of Education, over 14,000,000 students 
        attend public postsecondary degree-granting institutions across every 
        State in the United States, comprising almost \3/4\ of postsecondary 
        students in the United States;
Whereas the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis has found that publicly supported 
        community colleges ``enroll almost half of all U.S. undergraduate 
        students and are essential for work force training and retraining'';
Whereas according to the Center for Measuring University Performance, \1/2\ of 
        the top 50 research universities in the United States are public 
        institutions, from Virginia to Washington, Texas to Minnesota, Ohio to 
        Colorado, and many more;
Whereas according to the Department of Veterans Affairs, during the 2009-2010 
        academic year, public universities made up 2 of the top 5 most popular 
        choices for students who used benefits from the Post-9/11 Veterans 
        Educational Assistance Act of 2008 (38 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.); and
Whereas the first Tuesday in the month of March is an appropriate day to 
        designate as National Public Higher Education Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the first Tuesday in the month of March as 
        ``National Public Higher Education Day'';
            (2) recognizes the importance of public higher education 
        for growing a skilled domestic workforce, promoting research 
        and innovation, and advancing the global competitiveness of the 
        United States; and
            (3) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        National Public Higher Education Day with appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
#### Broadway 26 Waterview, LLC, Appellant, v Bainton, McCarthy & Siegel, LLC, Respondent.

[941 NYS2d 620]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered June 16, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from *507as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff landlord’s motion for leave to amend the complaint to add additional defendants and new causes of action sounding in alter ego and successor liability, and under the Debtor and Creditor Law, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In this action to recover rent arrears allegedly owed by defendant limited liability company, the motion court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion, as the proposed amended pleadings lack merit *(see 360*W. *11th LLC v ACG Credit Co. II, LLC,*90 AD3d 552, 553 [2011]; *see also Sepulveda v Dayal,*70 AD3d 420, 421 [2010]). None of the proposed individual defendants, former partners of defendant, were signatories to the original lease, and thus they cannot be held liable for the rent arrears *(see Matias v Mondo Props. LLC,*43 AD3d 367, 367-368 [2007]; *American Theatre for the Performing Arts, Inc. v Consolidated Credit Corp.,*45 AD3d 506 [2007]; Limited Liability Company Law § 609 [a]). In addition, the proposed amendments asserting that, after hiring defendant’s partners, the proposed defendant law firm became responsible for the rent arrears under the theory of successor liability fail as a matter of law, as there was no showing that the firm expressly or impliedly assumed defendant’s contractual liability, that there was a consolidation or merger of defendant and the firm, that the firm was a mere continuation of defendant, or that a transaction was entered in order to fraudulently escape rent obligations *(see Schumacher v Richards Shear Co.,*59 NY2d 239 [1983]; *Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Long Is. A.C., Inc.,*78 AD3d 801, 801-802 [2010]). Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue as to continuity of management merely by alleging that the firm hired defendant’s former partners *(see Kretzmer v Firesafe Prods. Corp.,*24 AD3d 158, 159 [2005]).

We have reviewed plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Freedman and Richter, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 31659(U).]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonathan McNitt, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 802]

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered February 18, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [former (3)]), resisting arrest (§ 205.30), and disorderly conduct (§ 240.20 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his request for new counsel *(see generally People v Rolfe,*83 AD3d 1219, 1220 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 809 [2011]). The record establishes that the court made a sufficient inquiry and determined that there was no good cause for substitution *(see generally People v Linares,*2 NY3d 507, 510-511 [2004]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court erred in admitting in evidence testimony regarding an uncharged crime *(see People v Thomas,*85 AD3d 1572, 1572 [2011]; *People v Kelly,*71 AD3d 1520, 1520 [2010], *lv denied 15*NY3d 775 [2010]). In any event, his contention is without merit inasmuch as the testimony was relevant to establish defendant’s motive and to provide relevant background information *(see Thomas,*85 AD3d at 1572; *People v Monzon,*289 AD2d 595 [2001], *lv denied*98 NY2d 712 [2002]). By failing to object to his appearance in prison garb at trial, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he was thereby denied a fair trial *(see People v Walker,*259 AD2d 1026, 1027 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 1029 [1999]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Finally, upon our review of the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of this case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, we reject defendant’s contention that he received ineffective assistance of counsel *(see generally People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.