alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-QSB REPORT OF OVM INTERNATIONAL HOLDING CORP. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000     
<CURRENCY>                                   RENMINBI YUAN     
                                           
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998   
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       8.28   
<CASH>                                              22,898   
<SECURITIES>                                             0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                      115,358   
<ALLOWANCES>                                        13,076   
<INVENTORY>                                         37,685   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   233,620   
<PP&E>                                              19,461   
<DEPRECIATION>                                       6,387   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     258,415   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              168,671   
<BONDS>                                                  0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0   
<PREFERRED>                                              0   
<COMMON>                                                10   
<OTHER-SE>                                          59,286   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       258,415   
<SALES>                                             75,226   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    77,331   
<CGS>                                               53,694   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       73,053   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,676   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,602   
<INCOME-TAX>                                           855   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    747   
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0   
<CHANGES>                                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                                           162   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.01   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.01   
                                                             
                                              

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Eddie Gardner, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Balbach, J.), imposed February 28, 1980, upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being an indeterminate term of 9 to 18 years’ imprisonment.

Resentence affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 10.32**

 

AMENDMENT 

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED 1997 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 

EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 15, 2000 

 

The Caremark Rx, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows: 

 

1. Amendment Regarding Transferability of Nonqualified Stock Options. Section 6.10(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 6.10(b)in its entirety and substituting the following new Section 6.10(b) therefor: 

 

(b) NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS. No NQSO granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated orhypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent not prohibited by any statute, rule or regulation applicable to the Plan, the Options, or the registration with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission of the Shares to be issued upon exercise of the Options, the Committee may, in its discretion, authorize all or a portion of NQSOs granted to a Participant to be on terms which permit transfer by such Participant to(i) Immediate Family Members, (ii) a trust or trusts for the exclusive benefit of such Immediate Family Members, or (iii) a partnership in which such Immediate Family Members are the only partners, provided that (A) the AwardAgreement pursuant to which such Options are granted must be approved by the Committee, and must expressly provide for transferability in a manner consistent with this Section, and (B) subsequent transfers of transferred Options shall beprohibited except those by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Following transfer, any such Options shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to transfer, provided that for purposesof this Plan, the term “Participant” shall be deemed to refer to the transferee. The events of termination of employment shall continue to be applied with respect to the original Participant, following which the Options shall be

 

1 

exercisable by the transferee only to the extent, and for the periods specified in thisSection 6.10. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should the Committee provide that Options granted be transferable, the Company by such action incurs no obligation to notify or otherwise provide notice to a transferee of early termination of theOption. In the event of a transfer, as set forth above, the original Participant is and will remain subject to and responsible for any applicable withholding taxes upon the exercise of such Options. 

 

2. Effective Date. The effective date of this Amendment shall beNovember 15, 2000. 

 

3. Miscellaneous. 

 

(a) Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaningsgiven them in the Plan. 

 

(b) Except as specifically amendedhereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to the Caremark Rx, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan to be executed as of the Effective Date. 

 

CAREMARK RX, INC.

Sara J. Finley, Corporate Secretary

 

2
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 144 (Friday, July 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 41158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16256]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release 14.03 
acres at the Melbourne International Airport, Melbourne, FL from the 
conditions, reservations, and restrictions as contained in a Quitclaim 
Deed agreement between the FAA and the City of Melbourne, dated August 
6, 1947. The release of property will allow the City of Melbourne to 
use the property for other than aeronautical purposes. The property is 
located located on the Northeast Corner of Martin Luther King Jr. 
Boulevard and NASA Boulevard at the Melbourne International Airport in 
Brevard County. The parcel is currently designated as surplus property. 
The property will be released of its federal obligations for the 
purpose of building a consolidated City of Melbourne Police 
Headquarters. The fair market value lease of this parcel has been 
determined to be $3,367,000. Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request 
are available, by appointment only, for inspection at the Melbourne 
International Airport and the FAA Airports District Office.

DATES: Comments are due on or before August 30, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at Melbourne 
International Airport, and the FAA Airports District Office, 8427 
SouthPark Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819. Written comments on the 
Sponsor's request must be delivered or mailed to: Marisol Elliott, 
Community Planner, Orlando Airports District Office, 8427 SouthPark 
Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisol Elliott, (407) 487-7231, 
Community Planner, Orlando Airports District Office, 8427 SouthPark 
Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

Bartholomew Vernace,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2021-16256 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EXHIBIT 31.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

        I, Patrick C. Barry, certify that:

        1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bluefly, Inc;

        2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

        3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for the periods presented in this report;

        4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

                b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                c.  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

        5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 9,  2005                                 /s/ Patrick C. Barry
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Patrick C. Barry
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
Case: 1:02-cv-09206 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/18/02 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cv-09206 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/18/02 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:2
Case: 1:02-cv-09206 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/18/02 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:3
Case: 1:02-cv-09206 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/18/02 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:4
Case: 1:02-cv-09206 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/18/02 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:5
Case: 1:02-cv-09206 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/18/02 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:6
Case: 1:02-cv-09206 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/18/02 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          59,002
<SECURITIES>                                   184,485
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,963)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               285,912
<PP&E>                                          23,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 758,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,830
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           626
<OTHER-SE>                                     700,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   758,489
<SALES>                                        100,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,565
<CGS>                                           23,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   835
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,921)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (54,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (54,400)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.99)


</TABLE>
# C_2016137EN.01000101.xml

| 19.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7853 — CMA CGM/Bollore/Kribi JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 137/01)

On 12 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7853. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7853. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") by META
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



|                      |  | /s/ALFRED J. AMOROSOAlfred J. Amoroso
President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/JOHN W. RILEYJohn W. Riley
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   
|Dated: March 29, 2004 |  |                                                                            

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of StarTek, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned individual, certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1)              The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The information contained the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Date: May 8, 2009 |   | /s/A. LAURENCE JONES                                             |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | A. Laurence Jones                                                |
|                   |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer                           |
|                   |   |                                                             |
|                   |   |                                                             |
| Date: May 8, 2009 |   | /s/ DAVID G. DURHAM                                              |
|                   |   | David G. Durham                                                  |
|                   |   | Executive Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and will be retainedby the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
#### Anoop SOGY, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-70847.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*1000Submitted July 12, 2011.*

Filed July 25, 2011.

Christopher John Stender, Esquire, Federal Immigration Counselors, Inc., APC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Joseph D. Hardy, Jr., Esquire, Trial, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Anoop Sogy, a native of the Philippines and a citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*821 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Sogy’s motion to reopen where Sog/s claims could have been raised in his prior proceedings before the agency. *See Mondragon v. INS,*625 F.2d 270, 272 (9th Cir.1980); *see also Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### MITCHELL V. THE STATE.

*Grime.*

(Decided June 13, 1907.)

Appeal from Covington Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. A. Pearce.

No counsel marked for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for the State.

Affirmed.

Opinion by

Tyson, C. J.

Dowdell, Anderson and McClellan, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 6 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 6

     Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
   Commission with respect to regulating the Internet and broadband 
                          industry practices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2011

Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Alexander, 
    Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Burr, Mr. 
Chambliss, Mr. Coats, Mr. Coburn, Ms. Collins, Mr. Corker, Mr. Cornyn, 
 Mr. Crapo, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Graham, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, 
   Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Johnson of 
Wisconsin, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Lee, Mr. McCain, Mr. Paul, Mr. Risch, 
   Mr. Roberts, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Shelby, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
  Toomey, Mr. Vitter, and Mr. Wicker) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
     Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
   Commission with respect to regulating the Internet and broadband 
                          industry practices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to the 
matter of preserving the open Internet and broadband industry practices 
(Report and Order FCC 10-201, adopted by the Commission on December 21, 
2010), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```