alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 267/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 267 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6130 July 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 267

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6130 July 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 267/01 | Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.8832 — Knauf/Armstrong) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 267/01

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.8832 — Knauf/Armstrong) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 267/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2018/C 267/03 | Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2018/768 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 267/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2018/C 267/03

Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2018/768

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 267/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8992 — Maritime Holdings/Zeaborn/Zeamarine JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2018/C 267/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8974 — Procter & Gamble/Merck consumer healthcare business) (
  1
  ) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 267/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8992 — Maritime Holdings/Zeaborn/Zeamarine JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

2018/C 267/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8974 — Procter & Gamble/Merck consumer healthcare business) (
  1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Insperity, Inc.; and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ Paul J. Sarvadi |
|   | Paul J. Sarvadi |
|   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Inter-American Foundation

# TIME AND DATE:

 July 27, 2021, 10:00 a.m.-11:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Via tele-conference.

# STATUS:

 Meeting of the Board of Directors, open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 Call to order

 IAF President/CEO Report

 Management Team Updates

 Adjournment

Portion to be Closed to the Public:

 Executive session closed to the public as provided for by 22 CFR 1004.4(b)

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Aswathi Zachariah, General Counsel, (202) 683-7118.

For Dial-in Information Contact: Karen Vargas, Board Liaison, (202) 524-8869.

The Inter-American Foundation is holding this meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b).

Aswathi Zachariah,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2021-15966 Filed 7-23-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 326 

Designating Thursday, November 17, 2011, as ‘‘Feed America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2011 

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. 

LUGAR, and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating Thursday, November 17, 2011, as ‘‘Feed 

America Day’’. 

Whereas Thanksgiving Day celebrates the spirit of selfless 

giving and an appreciation for family and friends; 

Whereas the spirit of Thanksgiving Day is a virtue upon 

which the United States was founded; 

Whereas, according to the Department of Agriculture, roughly 48,000,000 people in the United States, including 

16,200,000 children, continue to live in households that 

do not have an adequate supply of food; and 

Whereas selfless sacrifice breeds a genuine spirit of thanksgiving, both affirming and restoring fundamental principles in our society: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 326 ATS 

1 (1) designates Thursday, November 17, 2011, 

2 as ‘‘Feed America Day’’; and 

3 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

4 to sacrifice 2 meals on Thursday, November 17, 

5 2011, and to donate the money that would have 

6 been spent on that food to the religious or charitable 

7 organization of their choice for the purpose of feed8 ing the hungry. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,246
<SECURITIES>                                    23,633
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                       518
<INVENTORY>                                        689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,589
<PP&E>                                          17,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,757
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,782
<SALES>                                         29,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,364
<CGS>                                            2,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,575
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrae Box, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 525]

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered June 5, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

*1571Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and challenges the severity of the sentence. Although we agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because the minimal inquiry made by County Court was “insufficient to establish that the court ‘ engage [d] the defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice’ ” *(People v Brown,*296 AD2d 860 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 767 [2002]; *see People v Hamilton,*49 AD3d 1163, 1164 [2008]), we nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 291 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival of Diwali. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 12, 2011 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. LIEBERMAN, 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. CASEY, Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts, and Mr. MERKLEY) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 20), 2011 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the 

festival of Diwali. 

Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian 

Americans and South Asian Americans, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, and Jains throughout India, the 

United States, and the world; 

Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants 

light small oil lamps, place the lamps around the home, 

and pray for health, knowledge, peace, wealth, and prosperity in the new year; 

Whereas the lights symbolize the light of knowledge within 

the individual that overwhelms the darkness of ignorance, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

SRES 291 ATS 

empowering each celebrant to do good deeds and show 

compassion to others; 

Whereas Diwali falls on the last day of the last month in the 

lunar calendar and is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving 

for the homecoming of the Lord Rama and worship of 

Lord Ganesha, the remover of obstacles and bestower of 

blessings, at the beginning of the new year for many Hindus; 

Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is celebrated as Bandhi Chhor 

Diwas (The Celebration of Freedom), in honor of the release from prison of the sixth guru, Guru Hargobind; and 

Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha, or liberation, by Mahavira, the last 

of the Tirthankaras (the great teachers of Jain dharma), 

at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the religious and historical sig3 nificance of the festival of Diwali; and 

4 (2) in observance of Diwali, the festival of 

5 lights, expresses its deepest respect for Indian Amer6 icans and South Asian Americans, as well as fellow 

7 countrymen and diaspora throughout the world on 

8 this significant occasion. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 10.1**SECOND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT     THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of May 31, 2005, byand between RENAISSANCE LEARNING, INC., a Wisconsin corporation (“Borrower”), and WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”).RECITALS     WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of thatcertain Credit Agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as of December 1, 2003, as amended fromtime to time (“Credit Agreement”).     WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions setforth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect saidchanges.     NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are herebyacknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows:     1. Section 1.1 (a) is hereby amended by deleting “May31, 2006” as the last day on which bankwill make advances under the line of credit, and by substituting for said date “May31, 2007,” withsuch change to be effective upon the execution and delivery to Bank of a promissory note dated asof May 31, 2005 (which promissory note shall replace and be deemed the Line of Credit Note definedin and made pursuant to the Credit Agreement) and all other contracts, instruments and documentsrequired by Bank to evidence such change.     2. Section 5.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following substitutedtherefor:     “SECTION 5.4. LOANS, ADVANCES, INVESTMENTS. Make any loans or advances to or investments inany person or entity, except investments of excess cash in publicly traded, readily marketable,investment grade securities, or any of the foregoing existing as of, and disclosed to bank priorto, the date hereof.”     3. Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Credit Agreementremain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. All terms defined in the CreditAgreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment. This Amendment and the CreditAgreement shall be read together, as one document.     4. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in the CreditAgreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth therein. Borrower further certifies that as of thedate of this Amendment there exists no Event of Default as defined in the Credit Agreement, nor anycondition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both wouldconstitute any such Event of Default.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the dayand year first written above.      RENAISSANCE LEARNING, INC. WELLS FARGO BANK,
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

David E. Hershberg, Chief Executive Officer ofGlobecomm Systems Inc., and Andrew C. Melfi, Chief Financial Officer ofGlobecomm Systems Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that the quarterly report of Globecomm Systems Inc. onForm 10-Q for the three months ended March  31,  2006 (the‘‘Quarterly Report’’) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in theQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Globecomm SystemsInc.

|                    |  |                                                                                             |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Date: May  10,2006 |  | By: /s/ DAVID E. HERSHBERGDavid E.HershbergChairman of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|               |  | By: /s/ANDREW C. MELFIAndrew C. MelfiVice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer   |
|                    |

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Globecomm Systems Inc. and will be retained byGlobecomm Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities ExchangeCommission or its staff uponrequest.

----
#### Mannuccio Mannucci, M.D., et al., Appellants, v The Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, Respondent.

[941 NYS2d 493]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered January 5, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint without prejudice and with leave to replead, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ claims against defendant are based solely on the theory that defendant is the alter ego of nonparty Cabrini Medical Center. Accordingly, Cabrini is a necessary party to this action *(see Stewart Tenants Corp. v Square Indus.,*269 AD2d 246, 248 [2000]). Although the motion court did not consider whether the action should proceed without Cabrini pursuant to CPLR *4721001 (b), the matter need not be remanded *(cf. Matter of Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce v New York City Bd. of Stds. & Appeals,*5 NY3d 452, 462 [2005]). Indeed, because Cabrini has filed for bankruptcy protection and plaintiffs have not obtained relief from the automatic stay, the alter ego claims must be dismissed *(see St. Paul Fire & Mar. Ins. Co. v PepsiCo, Inc.,*884 F2d 688, 701-704 [1989]; *Corman v LaFountain,*38 AD3d 706, 708 [2007]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.
EXHIBIT
18











July 31,
2008





Board of
Directors


PHL
Variable Insurance Company


One
American Row


Hartford,
CT  06102





Dear
Directors:





We are
providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-Q
filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.





We have
been provided a copy of PHL Variable Insurance Company’s (the “Company”)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2008.  Note 2 therein describes a change in accounting principle
relating to the recognition of the cost of reinsurance and a related change in
accounting principle for deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”).  The
Company’s policy for recognizing the cost of reinsurance for certain of its long
duration contracts has been changed to recognize reinsurance recoveries in the
same period as the related reinsured claim, where previously such recoveries
were accounted for as part of the net cost of reinsurance and amortized over the
life of the underlying contracts in relation to estimated gross profits
(“EGP’s”).  In conjunction with this change, the Company has also
changed its policy for determining EGP’s for such contracts to include the
effects of reinsurance, where previously these effects had not been
included.  It should be understood that the preferability of one
acceptable method of accounting over another for these items has not been
addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our
concurrence below we have relied on management’s determination that these
changes in accounting principles are preferable.  Based on our reading
of management’s stated reasons and justifications for these changes in
accounting principles in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as
to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the
changes, we concur with management that such changes represent, in the Company’s
circumstances, the adoption of  preferable accounting principles in
conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No.
3.





We have
not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any
period subsequent to December 31, 2007.  Accordingly, our comments are
subject to change upon completion of an audit of the financial statements
covering the period of the accounting change.





Very
truly yours,





/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Hartford,
Connecticut
# C_2019255EN.01004401.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/44

---

Order of the General Court of 7 June 2019 — Hebberecht v EEAS

(Case T-171/19) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Suspension - Amounts withheld from remuneration - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 255/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Chantal Hebberecht (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: K. Bicard, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the EEAS’s decision communicated to the applicant on 20 September 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint directed against the EEAS’s decision to suspend her from her duties and to withhold amounts from her monthly salary and, secondly, payment of compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Ms Chantal Hebberecht shall pay her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Chantal Hebberecht shall pay her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.

---
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 188 

Opposing State bailouts by the Federal Government. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2011 

Mr. KIRK submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Opposing State bailouts by the Federal Government. 

Whereas each State of the Union is a sovereign entity with 

a constitution and authority to issue sovereign debt; 

Whereas the legislature of each State of the Union has the 

authority to reduce spending or raise taxes to pay the obligations to which the State has committed itself; 

Whereas the officials of each State of the Union have the 

legal obligation to fully disclose the financial condition of 

the State to investors who purchase the debt of such 

State; 

Whereas Congress has rejected prior requests from State 

creditors for payment of defaulted State debt; and 

Whereas during the financial crisis in 1842, the Senate requested that the Secretary of State report any negotiations with State creditors to assume or guaranty State 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 188 IS 

debts, to ensure that no promises of Federal Government 

support were proffered: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Federal Government should take no ac3 tion to redeem, assume, or guarantee State debt; 

4 and 

5 (2) the Secretary of the Treasury should report 

6 to Congress negotiations to engage in actions that 

7 would result in an outlay of Federal funds on behalf 

8 of creditors to a State. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS