alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


SECTION 906                                                         EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globecomm Systems Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
C. Melfi, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and.

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                      /s/ ANDREW C. MELFI
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                      and Treasurer
                                      February 14, 2003
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 32 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 470) 

3 an Act to further allocate and expand the availability of 

4 hydroelectric power generated at Hoover Dam, and for 

5 other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

6 shall make the following corrections: 

7 (1) In the second sentence of section 

8 105(a)(2)(B) of the Hoover Power Plant Act of 

9 1984 (43 U.S.C. 619(a)) (as added by section 2(d)), 

10 strike ‘‘General’’ and insert ‘‘Conformed General’’. 

11 (2) In section 2(e), strike ‘‘as redesignated as’’ 

12 and insert ‘‘as redesignated by’’. 

13 (3) In section 2(f), strike ‘‘as redesignated as’’ 

14 and insert ‘‘as redesignated by’’. 
2 

†SCON 32 ES 

1 (4) In section 2(g), strike ‘‘as redesignated as’’ 

2 and insert ‘‘as redesignated by’’. 

Passed the Senate October 18, 2011. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 32 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To authorize the Clerk of the House of Representaposes. generated at Hoover Dam, and for other pur- expand the availability of hydroelectric power ment of H.R. 470, an Act to further allocate and tives to make technical corrections in the enroll-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Jimenez, Also Known as Papito, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 583]

*1110Egan Jr., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Coccoma, J.), rendered May 24, 2010, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

In full satisfaction of a 22-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, waived his right to appeal and thereafter was sentenced in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement to seven years in prison followed by four years of post-release supervision. Defendant now appeals, contending only that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.

We affirm. To the extent that defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim impacts upon the voluntariness of his plea, it survives his otherwise valid waiver of the right to appeal *(see People v Peterkin,*77 AD3d 1017, 1017 [2010]; *People v Singh,*73 AD3d 1384, 1385 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 809 [2010]). However, as the record before us does not reflect that defendant moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, his ineffective assistance of counsel claim is not preserved for our review *(see People v MacDonald,*77 AD3d 989, 990 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 954 [2010]; *People v Rivera,*78 AD3d 1423, 1424 [2010]). In any event, defendant’s present assertion that he did not understand the nature of the proceedings due to his limited understanding of the English language is belied by the record *(see People v Feliz,*51 AD3d 1278, 1279 [2008]; *People v Tofaj,*14 AD3d 734, 734 [2005]; *People v Pagan,*284 AD2d 651, 652 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 922 [2001]). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Mercure, J.P., Rose, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.13
 
 StarTek
USA, Inc. (StarTek), AT&T Mobility LLC,
 RECITALS
        2.
    
    Except as amended by this Amendment, the SOW is not otherwise modified, revoked or
superseded and remain in full force and effect.
   StarTek USA, Inc.
    
    
    
    AT&T Mobility LLC by its authorizedRepresentative AT&T Services, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Patrick M. Hayes
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Richard SteadmanPrinted Name: Patrick Hayes
    
    
    
    Printed Name: Richard SteadmanTitle:
    
    EVP & COO
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    AVP  Global Strategic SourcingDate:
    
    4/30/08
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    30 April 2008
 Proprietary Information
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00217-CR

In re James Earl Crayton

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 47417, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

James Earl Crayton is serving a prison sentence for aggravated sexual assault. He

filed a motion for post-conviction DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01 (West

Supp. 2004-05). The State filed a response urging, among other things, that identity is not an issue

in this case. Attached to the motion was a copy of Crayton’s written statement to the police, in

which he admitted having sexual intercourse with the complainant but asserted that it was

consensual. The district court denied the motion for testing. See id. art. 64.03(a)(1)(B). This appeal

followed.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
2

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1969).

Appellant has filed a pro se brief. We have carefully considered the factual

allegations made in this brief and find no basis for disagreeing with the district court’s finding that

identity was and is not an issue. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the

appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The district court’s order is affirmed.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith

Affirmed

Filed: December 2, 2004

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 10.12

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT(this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of December 3, 2001, by and between
Caremark Rx, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Employer"), and Howard McLure ("Officer").

Recitals

WHEREAS, Employer desires to continue to retain the services of Officer and Officer desires to serve Employer in the capacity of Executive Vice President/Chief
Financial Officer; and

WHEREAS,
Employer and Officer desire to set forth the terms and conditions of Officer's continued employment with Employer under this Agreement.

Agreement

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:



---



2

---



3

---





6.Restrictive Covenants.As a material inducement for Employer to enter into this Agreement, Officer agrees to
the following restrictive covenants.



4

---



7.Miscellaneous.



5

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

CAREMARK
RX, INC.

|/s/ E. Mac CrawfordE. Mac Crawford
Chairman and CEO |  | /s/ Howard McLureHoward McLure
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------

6

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001031003
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   309,278
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               309,278
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    300,000
<COMMON>                                         9,278
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,278
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,371
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 2 of 17 PageID #:2
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 3 of 17 PageID #:3
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 4 of 17 PageID #:4
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 5 of 17 PageID #:5
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 6 of 17 PageID #:6
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 7 of 17 PageID #:7
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 8 of 17 PageID #:8
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 9 of 17 PageID #:9
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 10 of 17 PageID #:10
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 11 of 17 PageID #:11
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 12 of 17 PageID #:12
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 13 of 17 PageID #:13
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 14 of 17 PageID #:14
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 15 of 17 PageID #:15
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 16 of 17 PageID #:16
Case: 1:02-cv-00582 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/02 Page 17 of 17 PageID #:17
Consent of Independent Auditors

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-172 and Form S-8 No. 333-342) pertaining to the Vanguard Airlines, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Option Plan of Vanguard Airlines, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2002, except for Note 14, as to which the date is March 8, 2002, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Vanguard Airlines, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

 

 

 

	Ernst & Young LLP

Kansas City, Missouri

March 26, 2002
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM D. REED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER.

October 3, 1960.

*Mr. Brendan T. Byrne*and *Mr. Melvin P. Antell*for the petitioner, cross-respondent.

*Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss*for the respondent, cross-petitioner.

Granted.
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Louis Prichard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                              ___/s/ Louis Prichard_______
                              Chief Executive Officer

                              August 18, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Kentucky
Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



9
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Radiologix,
Inc. (the "COMPANY"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, Sami S. Abbasi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780
(d); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Sami S. Abbasi
-------------------------------------
Sami S. Abbasi
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       47
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 210 

Congratulating the Boston Bruins for winning the 2011 Stanley Cup 

Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 16, 2011 

Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. KERRY, Ms. SNOWE, Ms. COLLINS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. REED, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and 

Mr. LEAHY) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Boston Bruins for winning the 2011 

Stanley Cup Championship. 

Whereas on Wednesday, June 15, 2011, the Boston Bruins, 

the oldest National Hockey League (NHL) franchise in 

the United States, brought the Stanley Cup back to Boston for the first time in 39 years; 

Whereas to accomplish this feat, the Bruins defeated the 

Vancouver Canucks, the team with the best record in the 

NHL during the regular season, in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals; 

Whereas the Bruins became the first team in NHL history 

to win 3 deciding Game 7’s during a single playoff run 

and twice came back from 0–2 series deficits; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 210 ATS 

Whereas Bruins goaltender Tim Thomas won the Conn 

Smythe trophy, which is awarded to the player deemed 

most valuable to his team during the Stanley Cup playoffs; 

Whereas Tim Thomas shut out the Canucks in the deciding 

game of the Finals, and allowed only 8 goals over the 7 

game series; 

Whereas Bruins rookie Brad Marchand scored 11 goals in 

the playoffs, setting a team record for playoff goals by 

a rookie, and tying for the second-most playoff goals by 

a rookie in NHL history; 

Whereas Bruins right wing Mark Recchi hoisted his third 

Stanley Cup, and is retiring as a champion after 1,652 

NHL regular-season games and 190 playoff games; 

Whereas Bruins captain Zdeno Chara, at 6 feet, 9 inches tall, 

lifted the Stanley Cup as high above the ice as it has ever 

been lifted; 

Whereas Bruins General Manager Peter Chiarelli made key 

trades near the trade deadline to put the Bruins in a position for a Stanley Cup run, acquiring Tomas Kaberle, 

Rich Peverley, and Chris Kelly; and 

Whereas Bruins Head Coach Claude Julien ensured that the 

Bruins played and won as a team: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the Boston Bruins for win3 ning the 2011 Stanley Cup Championship; and 

4 (2) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

5 Senate to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu6 tion to— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 210 ATS 

1 (A) Head Coach Claude Julien; 

2 (B) President and former Bruins All-Star 

3 Cam Neely; and 

4 (C) General Manager Peter Chiarelli. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001031093
<NAME> METALLINE MINING COMPANY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         777,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               781,969
<PP&E>                                       1,235,805<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,017,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,152
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,926,698<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,017,774
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,633<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               210,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (209,139)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (209,139)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (209,139)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
<FN>
<F1>Consists of $1,171,540 in resource properties and claims, and $132,166 of
equipment at cost.
<F2>Consists of $4,817,100 in additional paid-in capital and $288,000 of stock
options and warrants, less a deficit of $3,178,402 accumulated during
development stage.
<F3>Consists of $1,633 in interest income.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Troy PELTS, a/k/a James Lee Start, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6402.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 21, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 3, 2011.

Troy Pelts, Appellant Pro Se. L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Troy Pelts appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence and denying his motion for an extension of time to file an appeal. We have reviewed the record and Pelts’s contentions regarding his § 3582(c)(2) motion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United, States v. Pelts,*No. *9896:92-cr-00305-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 13, 2009). Because we have reviewed Pelts’s challenge to the denial of a sentence reduction on the merits, we find his appeal of the denial of the motion for an extension to be moot. *United States v. Pelts,*No. 6:92-cr-00305-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2010). Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00416-CV

VILT AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. and Mediation Centers of America, L.L.C.,

Appellants

v.

Ho Kon PARKER and Richard T. Parker,

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-19561

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we deny the Parkers’ motion to dismiss. 

Furthermore, in accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we reverse the trial court’s 

judgment; and we remand the cause for a new trial. Costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellees 

Ho Kon Parker and Richard T. Parker.

SIGNED August 26, 2020.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice