alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 394 

Commemorating the 150th anniversary of Italian Unification and the beginning of warm and abiding relations between the people of the United 

States and Italy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2012 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mrs. SHAHEEN, 

Mr. LUGAR, Mr. CASEY, Mr. ENZI, and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 150th anniversary of Italian Unification 

and the beginning of warm and abiding relations between 

the people of the United States and Italy. 

Whereas it has been 150 years since March 17, 1861, when 

the parliament of a united Italy proclaimed Victor Emmanuel II their king; 

Whereas the story of the Italian Risorgimento, in particular 

Giuseppe Garibaldi’s heroic adventures, have inspired 

generations of Americans; 

Whereas, between 1880 to 1920, an estimated 4,000,000 

Italian immigrants arrived in the United States to settle 

and help build our Nation; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 394 ATS 

Whereas today there are almost 18,000,000 Americans of 

Italian ancestry whose contributions to our society are diverse and profound; 

Whereas Italy has been a loyal NATO ally and a major strategic partner for over 60 years; 

Whereas Italian-Americans have made enormous contributions to the United States; and 

Whereas Italy remains a steadfast partner in the defense of 

a shared vision of fundamental human rights and the 

preservation of democratic ideals: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the 150th anniversary of the 

3 foundation of the modern state of Italy; 

4 (2) celebrates the ties of kinship and shared 

5 democratic values that unite the two countries 

6 across the Atlantic; 

7 (3) honors the service and sacrifice of Italy’s 

8 soldiers, sailors, and airmen alongside United States 

9 forces most recently in Iraq, Afghanistan, and 

10 Libya; and 

11 (4) reaffirms the friendship between the Gov12 ernment and people of the United States and the 

13 Government and people of Italy. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Stanley Wells

Decided February 21, 1990

*K. Wynne Bohonnon,*in support of the petition.

*James M. Ralls,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 452, is denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.1.1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:03−cr−00779

Honorable Amy J. St. Eve

, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, September 22, 2010:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve:as to James R Wallwin:

Show Cause Hearing set for 10/6/2010 at 08:45 AM with regards to Probation's 9/16/10

Special Report. Mailed notice (kef, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 478 Filed: 09/22/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2591
Exhibit 10.116

UTSTARCOM, INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

This Amended and Restated Change of Control/Involuntary Termination Severance Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into effective as of
                        , 2006 (the "Effective Date"), by and between William X. Huang (the "Employee") and UTStarcom, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). Certain capitalized terms used in
this Agreement are defined in Section 1 below.

R E C I T A L S

A.    The
Company and Employee previously entered into a Change of Control Severance Agreement which provided the Employee with certain severance benefits upon the Employee's
termination of employement following a Change of Control.

B.    The
Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to provide the Employee with further
incentives to continue his employment.

C.    In
order to provide the Employee with enhanced financial security and sufficient encouragement to remain with the Company, the Board wishes to augment certain terms of
the Original Agreement, which is hereby amended adn restated in its entirety as follows.

AGREEMENT

In
consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and the continued employment of Employee by the Company, the parties agree as follows:



---





2

---





3

---





Unless
the Company and the Employee otherwise agree in writing, any determination required under this Section shall be made in writing by the Company's independent public accountants
(the "Accountants"), whose determination shall be conclusive and binding upon the Employee and the Company for all purposes. For purposes of making the calculations required by this Section, the
Accountants may make reasonable assumptions and approximations concerning applicable taxes and may rely on reasonable, good faith interpretations concerning the application of Section 280G and
4999 of the Code. The Company and the Employee shall furnish to the Accountants such information and documents as the Accountants may reasonably request in order to make a determination under this
Section. The Company shall bear all costs the Accountants may reasonably incur in connection with any calculations contemplated by this Section.

4

---





5

---





6

---





7

---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year first above written.

|COMPANY:  |  | UTSTARCOM, INC.             
|--------- |  | ----------------------------
|          |  | By:                         
|          |  | Title:                      
|EMPLOYEE: |  | Signature                   
|          |  | William X. HuangPrinted Name

SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CHANGE OF CONTROL
SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

8

---
<PAGE>   1







THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
GEOGRAPHICS, INC.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-16791) on Form S-8 of Geographics, Inc. of our report dated July 13, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Geographics, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for
the year ended March 31, 2000, and the related schedule, which report appears
in the March 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Geographics, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Vancouver, Canada
July 14, 2000
Exhibit 10.27
 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED AS TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT. EACH SUCH
PORTION, WHICH HAS BEEN OMITTED HEREIN AND REPLACED WITH AN ASTERISK [*], HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
 AMENDED AND RESTATED MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
  Introduction.
  Engagement of Manager .
 Manager Services.




---



##### 



Compensation .




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties of Manager .
    Representations and Warranties of Palisades .
 th




---



##### 



Term and Termination
   Notices .
 If to Palisades:
    
    Palisades Collection XVI, L.L.C.210 Sylvan AvenueEnglewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632Fax #: (201) 569-4595Attention: Gary Stern, Managerwith a copy to:Palisades Collection, L.L.C.210 Sylvan AvenueEnglewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632Fax #: 201-567-2203Attention: Seth C. Berman, Esq.If to Manager:                [*]with a copy to:
   Governing Law .




---



##### 



Entire Agreement .
 Successors and Assigns .
 Severability .
 Independent Contractor .




---



##### 



Facsimile and Counterparts .
 Insurance.




---



##### 



PALISADES COLLECTION, L.L.C.By:
    /s/ Gary SternName:  Gary SternTitle:    Manager[*]By:




---



##### 



[*]




---



##### 



Exhibit 2
 Monthly Gross Receipts Report
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Nos.333-38836) of our report, dated November 2, 2001,
(with respect to Note G, November 15, 2001) on our audit of Asta Funding, Inc.'s
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended September 30,
2001 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Asta Funding Inc. for the
year ended September 30, 2001.



Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
March 7, 2002
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 382 

Designating March 2, 2012, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2012 

Mr. REED (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 2, 2012, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success, and is a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading 

intervention and on providing additional resources for 

reading assistance, including through the programs authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) and through annual appropriations for library and literacy programs; and 

Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned 

about reading and education have joined with the NaVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:13 Feb 29, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR382.ATS SR382

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 382 ATS 

tional Education Association to designate March 2, the 

anniversary of the birth of Theodor Geisel (also known 

as Dr. Seuss), as a day to celebrate reading: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 2, 2012, as ‘‘Read Across 

3 America Day’’; 

4 (2) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. 

5 Seuss, for his success in encouraging children to dis6 cover the joy of reading; 

7 (3) honors the 15th anniversary of ‘‘Read 

8 Across America Day’’; 

9 (4) encourages parents to read with their chil10 dren for at least 30 minutes on ‘‘Read Across Amer11 ica Day’’ in honor of the commitment of the Senate 

12 to building a country of readers; and 

13 (5) encourages the people of the United States 

14 to observe ‘‘Read Across America Day’’ with appro15 priate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal L 110/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 110 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5712 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 110

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5712 April 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2014/189/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 28 December 2012 on State aid SA.33760 (12/N-2, 11/C, 11/N); SA.33763 (12/N-2, 11/C, 11/N); SA.33764 (12/N-2, 11/C, 11/N); SA.30521 (MC 2/10); SA.26653 (C9/09); SA.34925 (12/N-2, 12/C, 12/N); SA.34927 (12/N-2, 12/C, 12/N); SA.34928 (12/N-2, 12/C, 12/N) implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in favour of Dexia, DBB/Belfius and DMA
  (notified under document C(2012) 9962)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2014/189/EU

*

Commission Decision of 28 December 2012 on State aid SA.33760 (12/N-2, 11/C, 11/N); SA.33763 (12/N-2, 11/C, 11/N); SA.33764 (12/N-2, 11/C, 11/N); SA.30521 (MC 2/10); SA.26653 (C9/09); SA.34925 (12/N-2, 12/C, 12/N); SA.34927 (12/N-2, 12/C, 12/N); SA.34928 (12/N-2, 12/C, 12/N) implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in favour of Dexia, DBB/Belfius and DMA
  (notified under document C(2012) 9962)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2012) 9962)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 162/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.162.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 162 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5329 June 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.162.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 162

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5329 June 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Commission Directive 2010/36/EU of 1 June 2010 amending Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DIRECTIVES

*

Commission Directive 2010/36/EU of 1 June 2010 amending Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### In the Matter of Benjamin B. Hersh, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

May 19, 1986

*265APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gary L. Casella (Sylvia L. Fabriani*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Anthony J. Caputo, P. C. (Emanuel Thebner*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney by this court on June 21, 1939.

In this proceeding to discipline the respondent for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and the respondent cross-moves to disaffirm in part and confirm in part said report.

The Special Referee found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct as follows: preparing an affidavit of net worth on behalf of his client knowing that said affidavit was false and inherently misleading; transferring title to real estate which was in his client’s name when respondent knew or should have known that an earlier judgment of divorce prohibited such a transfer of title to anyone but his client’s former wife; falsely acknowledging as a notary public a signature on a bill of sale to be that of the rightful owner of a business knowing that the person signing was the son of the owner; failing to disclose to a court that which he was required by law to reveal, to wit, that the marital premises had been conveyed and executing a false affidavit to that effect; engaging in an impermissible conflict of interest by transferring his client’s mortgage to himself as trustee and substituí*266ing himself for his client in the foreclosure action on his client’s house; falsely representing in a stipulation that his client still owned the marital premises despite the fact that his client had previously conveyed said premises to his second wife in violation of a judgment of divorce; and suborning and/ or attempting to suborn the perjury of a witness during a hearing in the Supreme Court in an attempt to reduce his client’s support payments that were set by the judgment of divorce.

After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in full agreement with the report of the Special Referee. The respondent is guilty of the misconduct indicated above. The petitioner’s motion to confirm the Special Referee’s report is granted and the respondent’s cross motion is granted to the extent that it seeks to confirm the Special Referee’s report in part and in all other respects is denied. The respondent is adjudged guilty of serious professional misconduct.

In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed, we are mindful of the fact that respondent was admonished by the petitioner Grievance Committee on two prior occasions for similar misconduct. Accordingly, the respondent should be, and hereby is, disbarred, and his name is ordered stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Bracken, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Onacimo Benitez-Fernandez, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[946 NYS2d 912]

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), entered July 6, 2010 pursuant to the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act. The order denied defendant’s application to be resentenced upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in *People v Benitez-Fernandez*([appeal *1667No. 1] 96 AD3d 1665 [2012]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto and Lindley, JJ.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Southwest Watershed Research Center: Tucson, AZ
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About SWRCSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Tucson, Arizona SWRC Docs





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News
- SWRC Bulletin (Winter 2015)
- SWRC Bulletin (Winter 2014)
- SWRC Bulletin (Winter 2013)
- SWRC Bulletin (Winter 2012)
- SWRC Bulletin (Summer 2010)
- SWRC Bulletin (Summer 2009)
- SWRC Bulletin (Winter 2009)
- SWRC Bulletin (Summer 2008)
- SWRC Bulletin (Winter 2008)
- SWRC Bulletin (Summer 2007)
- SWRC Bulletin (Winter 2006)
- SWRC Bulletin (Summer 2006)
- SWRC Bulletin (Spring 2006)
- SWRC Bulletin (Early 2006)
- SWRC Bulletin (Fall 2005)
- SWRC Bulletin (Summer 2005)
- SWRC Bulletin (Spring 2005)
- October 30, 2003
- February 12, 2003
- December 30, 2002
- September 2002
- April 16, 2001
- April 2001

Bulletin Supplement (Winter 2006)headline bar


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Susan A. White et al., Appellants, v Robert H. Smith et al., Respondents. (Matter No. 1.) Robert Smith et al., Respondents, v Susan A. White et al., Appellants. (Matter No. *7352.)

—Motion by the respondents for reargument of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Widlitz, J.), entered October 16, 1984, which was decided by decision and order of this court, both dated July 29, 1985 *(White v Smith,*112 AD2d 418).

Motion granted and upon reargument, this court’s decision and order in the above-entitled cases both dated July 29, 1985, are recalled and vacated and the following decision is substituted therefor. The instant recall and vacatur is warranted since, on reargument, it has become apparent to this court that the action for specific performance is not ready for trial.

"In an action, *inter alia,*for specific performance of a written contract of sale, and in a summary holdover proceeding pursuant to RPAPL article 7, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Widlitz, J.), entered October 16, 1984, which granted the respondents’ motion for reargument and upon reargument (1) vacated a prior order of the same court dated August 23, 1984, which, upon the appellants’ motion, had directed that the action and proceeding be consolidated; and (2) denied the appellants’ motion for consolidation pursuant to CPLR 602.

"Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"Special Term did not err in refusing to consolidate the instant specific performance action and the summary holdover proceeding. It appears from the record that the specific performance action instituted by the appellants is not ready for trial due to the need for pretrial discovery. Thus, if consolidation were ordered, the respondents’ rights to a speedy disposition of their summary holdover proceeding would be severely prejudiced *(see, Schroder Bank & Trust Co. v South Ferry Bldg. Co.,*88 AD2d 570).

"Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.”

Motion by the respondents, *inter alia,*(1) for renewal of reargument of a motion resulting in an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), entered September 26, 1985, which restored the instant matters to the Trial Calendar; and (2) for a stay of said order pending appeal therefrom and pending a determination by this court on the respondents’ motion, *inter alia,*for reargument of an appeal from an order of this court dated July 29, 1985.

That branch of the motion which is for renewal or reargument dismissed. A motion for renewal or reargument is to be addressed to the Judge who issued the original order *(see,*CPLR 2221).

*736Motion otherwise denied. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.