alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Clonal Germplasm Repository: Corvallis, OR
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Plant Collections
                        Home
                                    Plant Collecting Expeditions
                                    Germplasm CGC Reports
                                    GRIN-Global
                                    Outreach
                                    Documents
                    USDASearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Plant Collecting Expeditionsheadline bar Plant Collecting Expeditions


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-867]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Novitium Pharma, LLC has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
                        **Supplementary Information**
                         listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before September 27, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before September 27, 2021.
 ADDRESS: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on June 17, 2021, Novitium Pharma, LLC., 70 Lake Drive, East Windsor, New Jersey 08520, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
SchedulePsilocybin
7347
IPsilocyn
7348
I
 The company plans to bulk manufacture the above controlled substances to produce Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) and finished dosage forms for clinical trial purposes. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. Brian S. Besser, Acting Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-15920 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Greg GIVENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mitch TOLSON; Richard A. Hayhurst; Richard M. Adams, Sr.; Jane Doe I; John Doe I, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-1198.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.

Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Greg Givens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Givens v. Tolson,*No. 3:10-cv-00909-HEH (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *145materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
# Official Journal L 281/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.281.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 281 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5513 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.281.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 281

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5513 October 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 of 26 September 2012 laying down the common rules of the air and operational provisions regarding services and procedures in air navigation and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1035/2011 and Regulations (EC) No 1265/2007, (EC) No 1794/2006, (EC) No 730/2006, (EC) No 1033/2006 and (EU) No 255/2010 (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 of 26 September 2012 laying down the common rules of the air and operational provisions regarding services and procedures in air navigation and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1035/2011 and Regulations (EC) No 1265/2007, (EC) No 1794/2006, (EC) No 730/2006, (EC) No 1033/2006 and (EU) No 255/2010 (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anibal Marrero, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), rendered April 28, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

A witness is generally not permitted to testify as to an extrajudicial identification of the defendant’s photograph *(see, People v Griffin,*29 NY2d 91; *People v Baker,*23 NY2d 307, *mot to amend remittitur denied*23 NY2d 898; *People v Casería,*19 NY2d 18); however, an exception to this general rule applies when the defendant opens the door to this type of inquiry during his cross-examination of the witness *(see, People v Brown,*62 AD2d 715, *affd*48 NY2d 921; *People v Carter,*52 AD2d 829; *cf People v Lindsay,*42 NY2d 9,12).

Based upon the record in the case at bar, we find that defense counsel persisted in a relentless attempt to pinpoint exactly at what point in time the complainant realized that he had seen the defendant before, despite defense counsel’s knowledge that the complainant’s revelation occurred at or about the time at which he was able to identify the defendant as his assailant from a photograph. It was this hectoring cross-examination that resulted in the complainant’s testimony that he had identified the defendant from a photograph before realizing where and when he had seen him before. Accordingly, the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion for a mistrial based on this testimony *(cf. People v Langert,*105 AD2d 845).

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, as we must *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932), we find that, based on the victim’s unfettered ability to observe the defendant throughout the course of the robbery which was committed in a small, well-lit elevator and lasted for approximately 15 minutes, the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, since " *'any*rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt’ ” *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621, quoting from *Jackson v Virginia,*443 US 307, 319).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Further, we find no reason for disturbing the sentence imposed by the trial court. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Small Business: Biomedical Sensing, Measurement and Instrumentation.                    

*Date:*                         August 12, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yordan V. Kostov, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive,  Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-867-5309,                         *kostovyv@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 22, 2021. 

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-15990 Filed 7-27-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Case 10-00742 Doc 8 Filed 01/11/10 Entered 01/12/10 09:03:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### David Dolitsky, Respondent, v Bay Isle Oil Co., Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 1.) David Dolitsky, Respondent, v George W. Gitzler, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

In two actions to recover damages for fraud in connection with the purchase óf real property, defendants appeal from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), both entered April 29, 1983, each of which granted judgment to plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,500, the amount of his deposit, upon a directed verdict.

Judgments reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, action No. 2 dismissed, and new trial granted as to action No. 1.

Plaintiff presented no evidence at trial in action No. 2 that defendant Gitzler acted other than as the agent of the corporate defendant, and Gitzler’s testimony that he acted only in his representative capacity was uncontradicted. Consequently, the case against Gitzler individually should have been dismissed.

Further, the judgment in action No. 1 against the corporate defendant must be reversed as the trial court erred in directing a verdict in this case. In considering a motion for a directed verdict, a court is not to engage in a weighing of the evidence, but instead must determine that by no rational process could the trier of facts find for the nonmoving party *(see, e.g., Lipsius v White,*91 AD2d 271, 276-277; *Blum v Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.,*292 NY 241, 245). The court must also take the view of the evidence that is most favorable to the nonmoving party *(see, Holmberg v Donohue,*24 AD2d 569, 570), and the motion should not be granted where the facts are in dispute, or where different inferences may be drawn or the credibility of witnesses is in question *(see, e.g., Cox v Don’s Welding Serv.,*58 AD2d 1013; *Le May v Frankel,*80 AD2d 665). Here, the parties differed as to when and under what circumstances the alleged misrepresentations about the building of a Merit station were made, raising clear issues of fact and credibility to be resolved by the jury. O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Healthy Processed Foods Research: Albany, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Albany, California Western Regional Research Center Healthy Processed Foods Research Docs





- Enhancing the Marketability of California Persimmons

Point of Sale Flyersheadline bar  Click on the thumbnail image for the flyer side (front or back) to download the .pdf file.  **Astringency Type**
**Front**
**Back**AstringentNonastringentVariant To request a set of 3 hardcopy flyers (1 of each astringency type), email Dr. Andrew Breksa using the form below. OMB 0518-0032 (12/2018) Items with asterisks (*) are required.  
            
First Name*:Last Name*:E-Mail:Organization:Address*:Address Line 2:Address Line 3:City*:State*:Zip/Postal Code*:Country (if not USA):Please describe how you plan to use the flyers.  (e.g. personal use, make copies for farmer's market stand, make copies for a classroom) *


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James R. Fournier, Appellant.

— Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Harris, J.), rendered March 6, 1985, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of arson in the third degree.

Recognizing that this appeal does not lie as of right (CPL 450.10 [2]), defendant requests that his notice of appeal be treated as an application for permission to appeal. We grant the application and reach the merits of defendant’s claim that his sentence is harsh and excessive.

In a seven-count indictment, defendant was charged with various crimes arising out of a break-in at the Mall Airways building at the Albany County Airport during the early morning hours of September 9, 1984. The most serious of the crimes charged in the indictment was arson in the third degree, a class C felony, to which defendant entered a guilty plea in satisfaction of all charges. The court imposed a prison sentence of 5 to 15 years.

We reject defendant’s challenge to the imposition of a 15-year maximum term, the maximum allowable for a class C felony (Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [c]). In imposing sentence, the trial court discussed such factors as deterrence, the possibility that the fire could have spread to other buildings, thereby endangering human life, the damage caused by the fire, and the danger to the fire fighters who responded to the fire. While it is likely that these factors would be present in many cases of arson in the third degree, we cannot say that the court abused its discretion in imposing a 15-year maximum term.

The court further imposed a 5-year minimum term "by reason of the nature of the offense and the nature of the offender”. Our review of the record reveals nothing extraordinary or unusually heinous about the offense. Similarly, we find nothing about defendant’s character and history which would support the imposition of a 5-year minimum, the maximum allowable by law (Penal Law § 70.00 [3] [b]). Defendant *936was only 17 years old at the time of the instant offense; his legal history consists of two juvenile matters which apparently were not significant enough to warrant any formal supervision. Although defendant dropped out of high school, he was enrolled in a program to obtain a graduate equivalency degree at the time of this offense. In these circumstances, we think a minimum period of 2 Vi years to be more appropriate.

Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, by reducing the minimum period of imprisonment from 5 years to 2 Vi years, and, as so modified, affirmed. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 27, 2017

jam

Order 

Clerk

February 27, 2017

155132

THOMAS M. SMITH, 

Plaintiff,

v SC: 155132

AGC: 16-1744

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff having failed to pay the partial filing 

fee as required by the order of February 3, 2017, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed 

to close this file.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      47,142,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,362,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                   980,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            79,300,525
<PP&E>                                       6,862,269
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,855,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,226,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,496,751
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    71,680,394
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                92,226,474
<SALES>                                     40,954,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,747,513
<CGS>                                        6,817,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,204,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,656,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               452,373
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (444,006)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,330,546
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,094,483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,236,063
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,236,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39


</TABLE>