alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 68 Filed: 04/16/03 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:240

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 68 Filed: 04/16/03 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:241

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 68 Filed: 04/16/03 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:242

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 68 Filed: 04/16/03 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:243

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 68 Filed: 04/16/03 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:244

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 68 Filed: 04/16/03 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:245

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 68 Filed: 04/16/03 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:246

Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 68 Filed: 04/16/03 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:247
# C_2022095EN.01003601.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/36

---

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2021 — CE v Committee of the Regions

(Case T-355/19 INTP) (1)

(Procedure - Interpretation of a judgment - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 95/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions (represented by: M. Esparrago Arzadun and S. Bachotet, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application for interpretation of the judgment of 16 June 2021, CE v Committee of the Regions (T-355/19, EU:T:2021:369).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interpretation is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interpretation is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | CE shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

CE shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Radiologix,
Inc. (the "COMPANY"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, Stephen D. Linehan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780
(d); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Stephen D. Linehan
-------------------------------------
Stephen D. Linehan
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       46
#### National Hotel Management Corporation et al., Respondents, v Shelton Towers Associates et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kartell, J), dated December 8, 1983, which (1) denied appellants’ motion, *inter alia,*to vacate an interlocutory judgment dated February 16, 1982, and to grant a new trial on the issue of liability, (2) confirmed the referee’s amended report on damages, and (3) awarded plaintiffs damages payable by appellants.

Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, motion granted, interlocutory judgment vacated, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

The trial court erred in denying appellants’ motion, *inter alia,*for a new trial *(see,*CPLR 5015 [a] [2]). The evidence submitted in support of the motion, consisting of depositions in another action, which were materially inconsistent with the testimony at trial concerning Norman Groh’s ownership of stock in National Hotel Management Corporation (National), obviously could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial prior to judgment *(see,*CPLR 4404, 4405), and went to the heart of the litigated issues.

Although motions of this type are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court *(see, Matter of Cristo,*92 AD2d 691), on the record before us we are compelled to conclude that such discretion was improvidently exercised. Groh’s testimony at trial that he was not a stockholder was plainly an underlying basis for Trial Term’s ruling that his alleged misconduct was collateral to the breach of contract claim and the defense that *155Groh’s termination was justified because of his affiliation with National. In addition, his testimony curbed counsel’s ability to cross-examine.

The inconsistency between the sworn statements at trial and the depositions is egregious. Either Groh’s stock was transferred to Hugh Jones, National’s president, without any conditions attached, as the plaintiffs testified, and Trial Term found, or it was held by Jones “in trust” for Groh and subject to return to him, as the testimony at the depositions shows. In such circumstances, we think it appropriate to grant a new trial (see, *Cesla v Frydman,*47 AD2d 742; *Hawkins v William F. Regan, Inc.,*39 AD2d 908).

With respect to the damages aspect of the appeal we note that the testimony of the principal witness in support of plaintiffs’ claim that appellants caused them to lose the opportunity to manage the Memphis Hilton was not credible *(see, Matter of McMillan,*218 NY 64), and, indeed, such damages were never alleged nor sought in the complaint. Titone, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-12025, 333-68128, 333-83650, 333-106647, 333-117070, 333-117137, 333-128113 and
333-136575) of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Impac Mortgage
Holdings, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ SQUAR, MILNER, PETERSON, MIRANDA & WILLIAMSON, LLP

Newport
Beach, California
March 15, 2010

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,647
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                   188
<INVENTORY>                                    18,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32,874
<PP&E>                                         36,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,668
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,023
<OTHER-SE>                                     (33,437)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,401
<SALES>                                        89,346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               89,346
<CGS>                                          72,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  72,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,452)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,003)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,455)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                    EXHIBIT 12


                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II
                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING II, L.P.
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
          COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                             (dollars in thousands)



                             FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED           FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                    March 31, 2006                       April 1, 2005
                          ----------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                            MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                              PREFERRED         PREFERRED          PREFERRED        PREFERRED
                          CAPITAL TRUST II  FUNDING II, L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST II FUNDING II, L.P.
                          ----------------  ----------------  ---------------- ----------------

<S>                              <C>               <C>                 <C>             <C>

Earnings                         $  6,186          $  7,242            $  6,186        $  7,225
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========


Fixed charges                    $      -          $      -            $      -        $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution requirements          6,000             6,186               6,000           6,186
                                 --------          --------            --------        --------

Total combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements       $  6,000          $  6,186            $  6,000        $  6,186
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
 fixed charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                        1.03              1.17                1.03            1.17
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      23,167,198
<SECURITIES>                                16,527,471
<RECEIVABLES>                              656,538,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                60,698,421
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       7,179,903
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,110,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             710,383,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       269,398
<OTHER-SE>                                  94,299,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               710,383,756
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           198,057,099
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            83,231,568
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            59,644,195
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,891,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             55,181,336
<INCOME-TAX>                                20,968,908
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         34,212,428
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                34,212,428
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

          - 8 CFR Chapter I
          - [DHS Docket No. ICEB-2017-0001]
          - RIN 1653-AA67

# AGENCY:

Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

# ACTION:

Ratification.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Homeland Security is publishing notification of the Secretary of Homeland Security's ratification of a rule.

# DATES:

The ratification was signed on April 15, 2021 and relates back to the original date of the action that it ratifies.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Leo (Chip) Boucher, Assistant General Counsel, Administrative Law, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528, (202) 282-9822.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On April 15, 2021, the Secretary of Homeland Security ratified a final rule entitled, Procedures and Standards for Declining Surety Immigration Bonds and Administrative Appeal Requirement for Breaches. *See*85 FR 45968 (July 31, 2020). The Department is now publishing the ratification in the **Federal Register** out of an abundance of caution. Neither the ratification nor the publication is a statement that the ratified action would be invalid absent the ratification, whether published or otherwise.

Signed:

Adam Hunter,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Immigration Policy, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 

      ( print page 40920)    

## Appendix

[FR Doc. 2021-16331 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9112-FP-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-28899, 333-28901, 333-28905, 333-28931) pertaining to the
ITLA Capital Corporation 1995 Employee Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated
January 30, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of ITLA Capital Corporation included in the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 28, 2003
#### PYRAMID ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. STANLEY J. STAKLINSKI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

June 23, 1960.

*Messrs. Lynch, Lora & Milstein*and *Mr. Benjamin Gross*for tbe petitioner.

*Messrs. Stein, Stein & Engel*and *Mr. David M. Pindar*for the respondent.

Denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 36 

To authorize the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol 

by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United 

States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. ALEXANDER) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To authorize the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall 

of the Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee 

on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration 

of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of 

the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION 

4 HALL OF THE CAPITOL. 

5 The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the United 

6 States Capitol are authorized to be used on January 21, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 36 ATS 

1 2013, by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 

2 Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and cere3 monies conducted for the inauguration of the President4 elect and the Vice President-elect of the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 338 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 338

 To authorize the production of records by the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2011

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the production of records by the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation.

Whereas, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation conducted an 
        investigation into unauthorized charges on telephone bills;
Whereas, the Committee has received a request from a state law enforcement 
        official for access to records of the Committee's investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the 
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, acting jointly, are 
authorized to provide to law enforcement officials, regulatory 
agencies, and other entities or individuals duly authorized by federal, 
state, or local governments, records of the Committee's investigation 
into unauthorized charges on telephone bills.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.15


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO


SERIES
B PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT


 


This
Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Warrant (the “Warrant”),
issued to Leviston Resources LLC by Creek Road Miners, Inc. (f/k/a Wizard Brands, Inc.) on March 26, 2021 and expiring on March 26, 2024,
is effective as of July 16, 2021 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined have
the meanings given them in the Warrant.


 


RECITALS


 


A.
Pursuant to Section 6(l) of the Warrant, each party desires to execute and deliver this Amendment to reflect the matters set forth
herein.


 


AGREEMENTS


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


 1. Forced Exercise. Section 5 of the Warrant is amended in its entirety to read as follows:




 


“Forced
Exercise. The Company can force exercise this Warrant upon five days advance written notice (during which period the Warrant will
remain exercisable) if the VWAP exceeds $5.25 per share for twenty (20) consecutive Trading Days and the daily average trading volume
of the Common Stock exceeds One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for each day in the period. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Warrant, the Warrant holder may not be forced to exercise this Warrant if such exercise would cause Warrant holder’s beneficial
ownership (as defined by Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the shares of Common Stock of the Company
to exceed 4.9% of its total issued and outstanding voting shares.”


 


2.
Miscellaneous. For the avoidance of doubt, references in the Warrant to the “Warrant” shall be deemed a reference
to the Warrant as amended by this Amendment. 


 


3.
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, and any party hereto may execute any such counterpart, each of which
when executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which counterparts taken together shall constitute but one and
the same instrument. 


 


4.
No Other Amendments. Except as otherwise specifically amended in this Amendment, the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect.


 


[Signature
Pages Follow.]


 




    	1



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date.


 


	 	CREEK
    ROAD MINERS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	 
	 	Name:
    	Scott
    Kaufman
	 	Title:
    	Chief
    Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	LEVISTON
    RESOURCES LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	 
	 	Name:
    	Roman
    Rogol
	 	Title:
    	Chief
    Financial Officer


 


[Signature
Page to Amendment No. 1 to Series 1 Warrant]
**Exhibit
      32.3**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      the
      undersigned Daniel T. Phillips, President and Chief Executive Officer of
      FIRSTPLUS Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.  The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended December 31,
      2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
              April 30, 2007
            
            /s/
              Daniel
              T. PhillipsDaniel
              T. PhillipsPresident
                and
                Chief Executive Officer
              Principal Executive
                Officer