alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Signaling and Molecular Endocrinology.                    

*Date:*                         August 23, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Latha Meenalochana Malaiyandi, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 812Q, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1999,                         *malaiyandilm@csr.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 23, 2021.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-16112 Filed 7-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR  THE  TWELVE  MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        9807
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2788
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             42595
<PP&E>                                      998585
<DEPRECIATION>                              193008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1644651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2508921
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    218780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  42427
<OTHER-SE>                                (1234480)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1644651
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            377380
<CGS>                                       488742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2914474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            263587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           1584595
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          231789
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (2800681)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (661824)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (2138857)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              33650
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2172507)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.59)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,100
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,687
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     57,143
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        340,693
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 429,979
<DEPOSITS>                                     366,090
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,635
<LONG-TERM>                                     23,784
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,208
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 429,979
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,849
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,617
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   487
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,953
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,543
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,731
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,222
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,238
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 236
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,959
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,959
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.76
<LOANS-NON>                                        550
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,065
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,744
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      812
<RECOVERIES>                                       146
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,316
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,316
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION



The undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                  |                      |        |                                    
|----------------- | -------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------------
|/s/ James D. Wehr | /s/ Peter A. Hofmann
|Name:             | James D. Wehr        | Name:  | Peter A. Hofmann                   
|Title:            | President            | Title: | Senior Executive Vice President and
|                  |                      |        | Chief Financial Officer            
|Date:             | August 16, 2010      | Date:  | August 16, 2010                    



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PHL Variable Insurance Company and will be retained by PHL Variable Insurance Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2020201EN.01002501.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/25

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 April 2020 — Aquind and Others v Commission

(Case T-885/19 R)

(Application for interim relief - Energy - Trans-European energy infrastructure - Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 - Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation No 347/2013 - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

(2020/C 201/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Aquind Ltd. (Wallsend, United Kingdom), Aquind Energy Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Aquind SAS (Rouen, France) (represented by: S. Goldberg, C. Davis and J. Bille, Solicitors, and by E. White, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, Y. Marinova and B. De Meester, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of the Commission Delegated Regulation of 31 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of projects of common interest of the Union.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 86

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Government Reform

and Oversight in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1997

Mr. BURTON of Indiana submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Government Reform and Oversight in the One Hundred

Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Government

4 Reform and Oversight (hereinafter in this resolution re5 ferred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of

6 all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable

7 accounts of the House of Representatives for committee

8 salaries and expenses, not more than $20,020,572 for the

9 One Hundred Fifth Congress.
2

•HRES 86 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $11,702,573 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 1997, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $8,317,999 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 1998, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

In re: § Case No.

§

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE'S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Hargrow, Bernice E 10 B 00242

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

§

§

Debtor

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

 1) The case was filed on 01/05/2010.

 2) The plan was confirmed on (NA).

 3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 

on (NA).

 4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the

plan on (NA).

 5) The case was dismissed on 05/06/2010.

 6) Number of months from filing or conversion to last payment: 0.

 7) Number of months case was pending: 5.

 8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: (NA).

 9) Total value of assets exempted: $16,300.00.

 10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without full payment: $0.

 11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank. 

EASTERN DIVISION

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00242 Doc 24 Filed 06/30/10 Entered 06/30/10 16:07:02 Desc Page 1

 of 4
Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor

Receipts:

$0

Less amount refunded to debtor $0

NET RECEIPTS: $0

Attorney's Fees Paid Through the Plan

Expenses of Administration:

$0

Court Costs $0

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0

Other $0

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Int.

Paid

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Principal

Paid

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00242 Doc 24 Filed 06/30/10 Entered 06/30/10 16:07:02 Desc Page 2

 of 4
Mortgage Ongoing

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

$0

Interest

Paid

Claim

Allowed

Principal

Paid

Secured Payments:

$0 $0

Mortgage Arrearage $0 $0 $0

Debt Secured by Vehicle $0 $0 $0

All Other Secured $7,163.34 $0 $0

TOTAL SECURED: $7,163.34 $0 $0

Domestic Support Arrearage $0

Priority Unsecured Payments:

$0 $0

Domestic Support Ongoing $0 $0 $0

All Other Priority $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PRIORITY: $0 $0 $0

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS: $0 $0 $0

Expenses of Administration

Disbursements:

$0

Disbursements to Creditors $0

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: $0

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00242 Doc 24 Filed 06/30/10 Entered 06/30/10 16:07:02 Desc Page 3

 of 4
 This Uniform Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork 

Reduction Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies. 

STATEMENT:

 12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, the

estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all administrative

matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee requests a final decree

be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may be just and proper. 

Date: June 22, 2010

Trustee

By:

/s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00242 Doc 24 Filed 06/30/10 Entered 06/30/10 16:07:02 Desc Page 4

 of 4
# CA2018321EN.01000101.xml

| 11.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 321/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 321/1

---

Corrigendum to notice of open competition — EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 — Armed security and protection officers (SC 1/SC 2)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 305 A of 30 August 2018
  )

(2018/C 321 A/01)

On page 8, Annex II:

| for: | ‘1. | Professional experience of at least 3 years and obtained over the last 6 years, in the field of armed protection/intervention within governmental, national and/or international public security services, including within private security companies providing services for international public organisations, permanent representations or diplomatic missions. To be taken into account, this experience must be in addition to the experience required to access the competition.’, |
| --- | --- | --- |

for:

‘1.

Professional experience of at least 3 years and obtained over the last 6 years, in the field of armed protection/intervention within governmental, national and/or international public security services, including within private security companies providing services for international public organisations, permanent representations or diplomatic missions. To be taken into account, this experience must be in addition to the experience required to access the competition.’,

| read: | ‘1. | Professional experience of at least 3 years and obtained over the last 8 years, in the field of armed protection/intervention within governmental, national and/or international public security services. To be taken into account, this experience must be in addition to the experience required to access the competition.’. |
| --- | --- | --- |

read:

‘1.

Professional experience of at least 3 years and obtained over the last 8 years, in the field of armed protection/intervention within governmental, national and/or international public security services. To be taken into account, this experience must be in addition to the experience required to access the competition.’.

---
#### In the Matter of Ernest W. Brunner.

—Motion for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York denied. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro,

Asch and Fein, JJ.
The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, United States District Judge for the Western District of *

Michigan, sitting by designation. 

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 11a0206n.06

No. 09-3979

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

AKIL McINTOSH, 

Petitioner-Appellee,

v.

STUART HUDSON,

Respondent-Appellant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF OHIO

OPINION

BEFORE: BOGGS and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; and QUIST, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. This case poses the question whether the statute of limitations for habeas

corpus claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(D) requires that the defendant demonstrate due diligence

in order to receive the later start date for appeal-based, as well as conviction-based, claims. The

district court concluded that due diligence is not required in appeal-based claims and therefore

Petitioner McIntosh’s appeal-based claim was timely. It determined that McIntosh was entitled to

notice of his appellate rights, despite his guilty plea, and therefore that the state court’s denial of his

delayed appeal violated federal law. The district court therefore granted a conditional writ of habeas

corpus, requiring reinstatement of McIntosh’s direct appeal within sixty days orrelease of McIntosh

from prison. 
No. 09-3979

McIntosh v. Hudson

- 2 -

Ohio reinstated McIntosh’s appeal. The Ohio Court of Appeals has now heard, and rejected,

McIntosh’s claim, State v. McIntosh, 2010-Ohio-6471, 2010 WL 5550252 (Ohio App. Dec. 30,

2010); and the time for him to seek review with the Supreme Court of Ohio has passed, see Ohio S.

Ct. Prac. R. 2.2(A) (requiring appeal within 45 days of decision). Therefore, McIntosh’s state appeal

has been completed, and the appeal before this court has become moot. See Hill v. Sheets, No. 08-

4654, 2010 WL 4627896, at *3 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding that when the state fulfilled one of the two

options ordered by the district court for habeas relief, the appeal to this court was moot). 

The sole reason we dismiss this appeal is that it is now moot and thus immune from review;

Hall v. Beals, 396 U.S. 45, 48 (1969); whether a right to notice of appeal in these circumstances is

“clearly established,” however, remains an open question. Because we lack the authority to vacate

the district court’s now-moot judgment granting habeas relief, we DISMISS the appeal for want of

jurisdiction.
#### Daniel Buchinger et al., Respondents, v Jazz Leasing Corp. et al., Appellants.

[944 NYS2d 316]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Siegal, J.), entered September 22, 2011, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, the plaintiffs demonstrated that the plaintiff pedestrian, Daniel Buchinger, was walking within a crosswalk, with the pedestrian signal in his favor, when the car owned by the defendant Jazz Leasing Corp., and operated by the defendant Marilyn A. Jones, failed to yield the right of way, and struck him. The plaintiffs further demonstrated that, in exercising due care, the plaintiff pedestrian had looked in all directions to check for approaching vehicles before he entered the intersection. As the Supreme Court correctly found, this proof was sufficient to establish the plaintiffs’ prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, including that the plaintiff pedestrian was free from comparative fault *(see Rosenblatt v Venizelos,*49 AD3d 519 [2008]; *see also Hamilton v King Tung Kong,*93 AD3d 821 [2012]; *Azeem v Cava,*92 AD3d 821 [2012]; *Arazashvilli v Executive Fleet Mgt., Corp.,*90 AD3d 682 [2011]; *see generally Roman v Al Limousine, Inc.,*76 AD3d 552 [2010]).

In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Jones’s deposition testimony was internally inconsistent and also contradicted her earlier admission, contained in a police accident report. Further, the defendants made no effort to dispute the accuracy of Jones’s statement in that police accident report *(see Rosenblatt v Venizelos,*49 AD3d 519 [2008]). It appears that the inconsistency was designed to raise feigned factual issues in an effort to avoid the consequences of the earlier admission contained in the police accident report *(id.; see Nieves v JHH Transp., LLC,*40 AD3d 1060, 1060 [2007]).

Moreover, the motion for summary judgment was not premature since the defendants failed to demonstrate that additional discovery may lead to relevant evidence or that the facts essential to justify opposition to the motion were exclusively within the knowledge and control of the plaintiffs *(see Savage v Quinn,*91 AD3d 748, 750 [2012]; *Arazashvilli v Executive Fleet Mgt., Corp.,*90 AD3d 682 [2011]; *Martinez v Kreychmar,*84 *1054AD3d 1037 [2011]). “The ‘mere hope or speculation that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered’ by further discovery is an insufficient basis for denying the motion” *(Woodard v Thomas,*77 AD3d 738, 740 [2010], quoting *Lopez v*WS *Distrib., Inc.,*34 AD3d 759, 760 [2006]; *see Arazashvilli v Executive Fleet Mgt, Corp.,*90 AD3d 682 [2011]; *Martinez v Kreychmar,*84 AD3d 1037 [2011]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Angiolillo, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Cohen, JJ, concur.