alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 06-10886
In The Matter Of: KEVCO INC Debtor

------------------------- COASTAL INDUSTRIES, INC. Appellant

VERSUS DENNIS FAULKNER, Plan Administration Agent Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth 4:05-CV-691
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 After reviewing the record and considering the argument of counsel and the briefs of the parties, we are satisfied the district court committed no reversible error. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the district court essentially for the2

reasons stated in the Bankruptcy Court’ s thorough Memorandum Opinion dated June 30, 2005. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No.333-133890, Form S-8 No. 33-99214, 333-32039, 333-83193, 333-85320, 333-109186, 333-63076,333-112139, 333-126157, 333-131097, 333-136491, 333-138978 pertaining to the amended andrestated 1995 Stock Option Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan and International Employee StockPurchase Plan, 1995 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, Special Stock Option Plan, SanDiskCorporation 2005 Incentive Plan, SanDisk Corporation 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, SanDiskCorporation 2005 International Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Rhombus, Inc. 1998 Long Term EquityIncentive Plan, Matrix Semiconductor, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan, Matrix Semiconductor, Inc. 2005 StockIncentive Plan, msystems Ltd. 2003 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Incentive Plan and themsystems Ltd. Section 102 Stock Option/Stock Purchase and Stock Option Plans) of SanDiskCorporation, of our reports dated February 19, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of SanDisk Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of SanDisk Corporation, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 30, 2007.                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP  San Jose, California
# C_2020103EN.01000901.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/9

---

Appeal brought on 25 November 2019 by NHS, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 19 September 2019 in Case T-378/18, NHS v EUIPO

(Case C-858/19 P)

(2020/C 103/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: NHS, Inc. (represented by: P. Olson, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 6 February 2020 the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal is not allowed to proceed and that NHS, Inc. shall bear its own costs.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard PUENTES-FUENTES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10354

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 29, 2011.

Suzanna Odette Etessam, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Bruce Cameron Kaye, Esq., Law Offices of Bruce C. Kaye, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Richard Puentes-Fuentes, Cl Big Spring, Big Spring, TX, pro se.

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Richard Puentes-Fuentes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California, 386*U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Puentes-Fuentes has not filed a response. Our review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. We concur with counsel’s conclusion that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 337 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 337

   Designating December 10, 2011, as ``Wreaths Across America Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2011

    Ms. Collins (for herself and Ms. Snowe) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating December 10, 2011, as ``Wreaths Across America Day''.

Whereas 20 years ago, the Wreaths Across America project began an annual 
        tradition, during the month of December, of donating, transporting, and 
        placing Maine balsam fir holiday wreaths on the graves of the fallen 
        heroes buried at Arlington National Cemetery;
Whereas since that tradition began, through the hard work and generosity of the 
        individuals involved in the Wreaths Across America project, more than 
        250,000 wreaths have been sent to more than 700 locations, including 
        national cemeteries and veterans memorials in every State and to 
        locations overseas;
Whereas in 2010, wreaths were sent to more than 520 locations across the United 
        States and overseas, 100 more locations than the previous year;
Whereas in December 2011, the Patriot Guard Riders, a motorcycle and motor 
        vehicle group that is dedicated to patriotic events and includes more 
        than 250,000 members nationwide, will continue their tradition of 
        escorting a tractor-trailer filled with donated wreaths from Harrington, 
        Maine, to Arlington National Cemetery;
Whereas thousands of individuals volunteer each December to escort and lay the 
        wreaths;
Whereas December 11, 2010, was previously designated by the Senate as ``Wreaths 
        Across America Day''; and
Whereas the Wreaths Across America project will continue its proud legacy on 
        December 10, 2011, bringing 75,000 wreaths to Arlington National 
        Cemetery on that day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates December 10, 2011, as ``Wreaths Across 
        America Day'';
            (2) honors the Wreaths Across America project, the Patriot 
        Guard Riders, and all of the volunteers and donors involved in 
        this worthy tradition; and
            (3) recognizes the sacrifices our veterans, members of the 
        Armed Forces, and their families have made, and continue to 
        make, for our great Nation.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Great Basin Rangelands Research: Reno, NV
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Newsletter
                        Volume 1
                                    Volume 2Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Reno, Nevada Great Basin Rangelands Research Rangeland Rehabilitation Lab Rehab Weed Science posters







Researchheadline bar Weed Science Society Posters 2006 Phenology ofBromusTectorumand AssociatedSpecies 2005 The Use of Goat Grazing to Biologically Suppress PerennialPepperweed 2005 Downy Brome SeedGermination 2004 Germination Ecology of Seeds ofCentuareaSulphurea 2004 Germination and Seedbed Ecology ofCentaureaMaculosaSeeds 2004 Community Succession Among Invasive Exotic Weeds


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.2.2

Eastern Division

Carmen Feliciano, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:03−cv−01768

Honorable James B. Zagel

County of Cook, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 16, 2008:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable James B. Zagel:Motion hearing held on

12/16/2008 regarding motion to strike [227]. Response due by 1/26/2009.Mailed

notice(drw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case 1:03-cv-01768 Document 229 Filed 12/16/08 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the foregoing Report on Form 10-K pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

 

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Broadway Financial Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 
| Date:   April 6, 2020 | By:    | /s/   Brenda J. Battey           |
|----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                       |   | Brenda   J. Battey               |
|                       |   | Chief   Financial Officer        |
|                       |   | Broadway   Financial Corporation |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   March, 31
                                              -------------------
                                                1998        1997
                                              -------     -------

BASIC

<S>                                           <C>         <C>     
Net income (loss)                             $ 3,073     $  (880)

Weighted average shares outstanding            18,054       2,000

Per share earnings (loss)                     $  0.17     $ (0.44)
                                              =======     =======



DILUTED

Net income (loss)                             $ 3,073     $  (880)

Weighted average shares outstanding            18,054       2,000

Weighted average common stock equivalents         787           0
                                              -------     -------

Total shares outstanding                       18,841       2,000

Per share earnings (loss)                     $  0.16     $ (0.44)
                                              =======     =======
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

DONALD W. PARRILLO and
KIMBERLY E. SCHOB,

Plaintiffs,

m No.

NANCY L. REILLY f/k/a NANCY R,
PARRILLO, et al.,

Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On May 23, 2002, this court briefly summarized at least some of the litigation in state
and federal courts in Ilinois and Indiana arising, apparently, in the aftermath of the 1970
divorce of Parrillo and Reilly, We there dismissed the attack by Parrillo and his daughter,
Kimberly E. Schob, on an Indiana bankruptcy proceeding. And we went further. Aware that
Parrillo and his daughter were intending to bring even more cases, probably in Arizona, we
enjoined them from initiating any action anywhere relating to the assets included in the
Indiana bankruptcy estate, or the enforcement of Reilly’s judgment against Parrillo, without
prior leave of court.

In 1997, an Indiana court altered a payment schedule on a 1994 Reilly judgment against
Parrillo, According to Schob, one consequence of that alteration was a Reilly judgment
against her and her husband for $90,000 in the Indiana bankruptcy court. In 2006, an Illinois
court determined that the 1997 alteration was null and void because it failed to give full faith

and credit to the 1994 judgement. That means, contends Schob, that the related $90,000

judgment cannot stand, but she cannot proceed because of the injunction here.



“No. 02 C2305 Page 2

We have no quarrel with Schob going back to the judges before whom she has
previously appeared, whether they be in Illinois or Indiana, for relief from their prior actions
or for further relief. We doubt our jurisdiction to enjoin an Indiana bankruptcy court or an
Illinois state court from acting in matters where they previously acted when they had
jurisdiction and this court did not. In any event, we do not consider a return to those courts
as “initiating” an action. And a return is how Schob describes what she wants to do (although
Reilly’s description appears to be more expansive). In those circumstances we deny the motion
for leave to vacate a bankruptcy judgment and for leave to proceed in the state courts as moot.
Schob may go back to Judge King and Wheaton. We sce no reason, however, to permit Schob

to file new cases in 2008. The injunction remains in effect.

JAMES B. MORAN
ior Judge, U. S. District Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-3321, 333-3323 and 333-47357 of CD&L, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated
April 14, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of CD&L, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CD&L, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP


Roseland, New Jersey
April 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES HOLDING
CORPORATION FOR YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 1, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001000654
<NAME> COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES HOLDING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1999
<CASH>                                           4,247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     52,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,792
<PP&E>                                          76,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,885
<BONDS>                                        117,811
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,228
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,964)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,584
<SALES>                                        255,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,680
<CGS>                                          199,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,983
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,053)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       605
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,658)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,658)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2




NOTICE OF INABILITY TO OBTAIN CONSENT FROM ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),
provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes
effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein
not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration
statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person
knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the
registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection
with the registration statement.

On August 5, 2002, the Board of Directors of CD&L, Inc. (the "Company") and its
Audit Committee dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") as the Company's
independent public accountants and engaged Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte") to
serve as the Company's independent public accountants for the balance of fiscal
year 2002. For additional information, see the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on August 9, 2002.

After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Andersen's
written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's
registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended: (File Nos.
333-3321, 333-3323 and 333-47357) and the related prospectuses (the
"Registration Statements") of Andersen's audit report with respect to the
Company's consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and for the
three years in the period then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under
the Securities Act permits the Company to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statements, without a
written consent from Andersen. As a result, with respect to transactions in the
Company's securities pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur
subsequent to the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Andersen will not have any liability under
Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact
contained in the financial statements audited by Andersen or any omissions of a
material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to
assert a claim against Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner
v. JOHN J. KELLER, Respondent

PER CURIAM: : : : : : : : No. 1363 Disciplinary Docket No.3
No.43DB 2008 Attorney Registration No. 10282 (Lehigh County)
O R D E R

AND NOW,this 15th day of October,2014,there having been filed with this Court by John J. Keller his verified Statement of Resignation dated August 25, 2014, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215,Pa.R.D.E.,it is ORDERED that the resignation of John J. Keller is accepted; he is disbarred on consent from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuantto Rule 208(g),Pa.R.D.E.