# Official Journal C 9/11 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 9 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6411 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 9

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6411 January 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2021/C 9/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2021/C 9/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2021/C 9/02 | Case C-644/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 November 2020 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/50/EC — Ambient air quality — Article 13(1) and Annex XI — Systematic and persistent exceedance of limit values for microparticles (PM10) in certain Italian zones and agglomerations — Article 23(1) — Annex XV — Exceedance period to be ‘as short as possible’ — Appropriate measures) | 2 |
| 2021/C 9/03 | Case C-158/20 P: Appeal brought on 7 April 2020 by Jean Whitehead and David Evans against the order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 January 2020 in Case T-541/19, Shindler and Others v Council | 3 |
| 2021/C 9/04 | Case C-170/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa (Romania) lodged on 23 April 2020 — SC Novart Engineering SRL v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Municipiul Tulcea | 3 |
| 2021/C 9/05 | Case C-235/20 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by ViaSat, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-734/17, ViaSat v Commission | 4 |
| 2021/C 9/06 | Case C-304/20 P: Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-108/19, Kerry Luxembourg v EUIPO | 4 |
| 2021/C 9/07 | Case C-305/20 P: Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-109/19, Kerry Luxembourg v EUIPO | 5 |
| 2021/C 9/08 | Case C-367/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 6 August 2020 — SP v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Direktion für Deutschland | 5 |
| 2021/C 9/09 | Case C-446/20 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2020 by Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2020 in Case T-616/19, Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) | 6 |
| 2021/C 9/10 | Case C-463/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 24 September 2020 — Namur-Est Environnement ASBL v Région wallonne | 6 |
| 2021/C 9/11 | Case C-469/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 29 September 2020 — RightNow GmbH v Wizz Air | 7 |
| 2021/C 9/12 | Case C-471/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Centre d’enseignement secondaire Saint-Vincent de Soignies ASBL v FS | 8 |
| 2021/C 9/13 | Case C-483/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 29 September 2020 — XXXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides | 8 |
| 2021/C 9/14 | Case C-485/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 29 September 2020 — XXXX v HR Rail, SA | 9 |
| 2021/C 9/15 | Case C-505/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 October 2020 — RR and JG, applicants in the context of criminal proceedings | 9 |
| 2021/C 9/16 | Case C-556/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 23 October 2020 — Schneider Electric SA and Others v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance | 10 |
| 2021/C 9/17 | Case C-586/20 P: Appeal brought on 9 November 2020 by P. Krücken Organic GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2020 in Case T-565/18, P. Krücken Organic GmbH v European Commission | 11 |
| | General Court |
| 2021/C 9/18 | Case T-814/17: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Lietuvos geležinkeliai v Commission (Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Rail freight market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU — Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company — Removal of a section of railway track — Concept of ‘abuse’ — Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor — Calculation of the amount of the fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method for setting fines — Remedies — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 13 |
| 2021/C 9/19 | Case T-594/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Pharma Mar v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Aplidin — plitidepsin — Commission decision refusing authorisation — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Scientific evaluation of the risks and benefits of a medicinal product — Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use — Objective impartiality) | 13 |
| 2021/C 9/20 | Case T-25/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — AD v ECHA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contracts — Decision not to renew — Duty of care — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Right to be heard — Duty to state reasons — Liability) | 14 |
| 2021/C 9/21 | Case T-173/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — AV and AW v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Reimbursement of medical expenses — OLAF investigation — Article 85 of the Staff Regulations — Recovery of undue payments) | 15 |
| 2021/C 9/22 | Case T-273/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Target Ventures Group v EUIPO — Target Partners (TARGET VENTURES) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark TARGET VENTURES — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 15 |
| 2021/C 9/23 | Case T-583/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Electrolux Home Products v EUIPO — D. Consult (FRIGIDAIRE) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark FRIGIDAIRE — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 16 |
| 2021/C 9/24 | Case T-643/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA — Genuine use of the mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Use with the proprietor’s consent — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 16 |
| 2021/C 9/25 | Case T-664/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Allergan Holdings France v EUIPO — Dermavita (JUVEDERM ULTRA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA — Genuine use of the mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 17 |
| 2021/C 9/26 | Case T-820/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — Totalizator Sportowy v EUIPO — Lottoland Holdings (Lottoland) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Lottoland — Earlier national figurative marks LOTTO and Lotto — Earlier national word mark lotto — Declaration of partial invalidity — Relative ground for refusal — No damage to reputation — No link between the marks at issue — Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 18 |
| 2021/C 9/27 | Case T-857/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Dehousse v Court of Justice of the European Union (Access to documents — Court of Justice of the European Union — Documents held by an institution in the exercise of its administrative functions — Article 266 TFEU — Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court — Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment — Presumption of non-existence or non-possession of documents — Plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession of documents — Obligation to state reasons — Retention of documentation — Principle of good administration) | 18 |
| 2021/C 9/28 | Case T-25/20: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — Deutsche Post v EUIPO Pošta Slovenije (Representation of a stylised horn) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of an EU figurative mark representing a stylised horn — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a post horn on a yellow background — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Lack of distinctive character of the earlier mark — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 19 |
| 2021/C 9/29 | Case T-629/19: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — L. Oliva Torras v EUIPO — Mecánica del Frío (Vehicle couplings) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a coupling to hitch refrigeration or air conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle — Ground for invalidity — Failure to comply with the requirements for protection — Articles 4 to 9 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal — Pleas in law referring to the grounds of another decision — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 20 |
| 2021/C 9/30 | Case T-13/20: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — Valiante v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil Service — Officials — Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 (AD 10) — Submission of the application by means of the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Separate application to be admitted to the competition submitted at the same time to the appointing authority — Eligibility criteria — Selection board’s decision rejecting the applicant’s application — Appointing authority’s decision refusing the applicant’s request to disregard one of the conditions set out in the competition notice in order to admit him to the competition — Challenge to the appointing authority’s decision not that of the selection board — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility) | 20 |
| 2021/C 9/31 | Case T-14/20: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — Tratkowski v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Internal Competition COM/2/AD 12/18 (AD 12) — Submission of the application using the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Request to be admitted to the competition, lodged at the same time and on a separate sheet of paper, to the Appointing Authority — Eligibility conditions — Decision of the selection board to reject the applicant’s application — Rejection by the selection board of the candidate’s request for re-examination due to it being out of time — Decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to grant the applicant’s request to set aside one of the conditions provided for in the notice of competition in order to admit him to the competition — Challenge to the decision of the Appointing Authority and not to that of the selection board — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility) | 21 |
| 2021/C 9/32 | Case T-38/20: Order of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LOTTO24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 22 |
| 2021/C 9/33 | Case T-377/20 R II: Order of the President of the General Court of 19 October 2020 — KN v EESC (Application for interim measures — Civil Service — Member of the EESC — Harassment — OLAF investigation — EESC Bureau decision — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — New application — New facts — Lack of urgency) | 22 |
| 2021/C 9/34 | Case T-165/20: Action brought on 30 October 2020 — JC v EUCAP Somalia | 23 |
| 2021/C 9/35 | Case T-630/20: Action brought on 14 October 2020 — MW v Parliament | 24 |
| 2021/C 9/36 | Case T-633/20: Action brought on 9 October 2020 — CNMSE and Others v Parliament and Council | 24 |
| 2021/C 9/37 | Case T-640/20: Action brought on 16 October 2020 — Validity v Commission | 25 |
| 2021/C 9/38 | Case T-645/20: Action brought on 23 October 2020 — NC and Others v Parliament and Council | 26 |
| 2021/C 9/39 | Case T-647/20: Action brought on 21 October 2020 — Verelst v Council | 27 |
| 2021/C 9/40 | Case T-662/20: Action brought on 5 November 2020 — Muratbey Gida v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (Triple helicoid cheese) | 28 |
| 2021/C 9/41 | Case T-663/20: Action brought on 30 October 2020 — One Voice v ECHA | 28 |
| 2021/C 9/42 | Case T-664/20: Action brought on 30 October 2020 — One Voice v ECHA | 29 |
| 2021/C 9/43 | Case T-671/20: Action brought on 9 November 2020 — OA v EESC | 30 |
| 2021/C 9/44 | Case T-672/20: Action brought on 6 November 2020 — Kerstens v Commission | 31 |
| 2021/C 9/45 | Case T-677/20: Action brought on 13 November 2020 — Ryanair and Laudamotion v Commission | 31 |
| 2021/C 9/46 | Case T-689/20: Action brought on 17 November 2020 — HB v EIB | 32 |
| 2021/C 9/47 | Case T-325/19: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2020 — Cipriani v EUIPO — Hotel Cipriani (ARRIGO CIPRIANI) | 33 |
| 2021/C 9/48 | Joined Cases T-389/19 to T-394/19, T-397/19, T-398/19, T-403/19, T-404/19, T-406/19, T-407/19, T-409/19 to T-418/19, T-420/19 to T-422/19, T-425/19 to T-427/19, T-429/29 to T-432/19, T-435/19, T-436/19, T-438/19 to T-442/19, T-444/19 to T-446/19, T-448/19 to T-454/19, T-463/19 and T-465/19: Order of the General Court of 8 October 2020 — Coppo Gavazzi and Others v Parliament | 33 |
| 2021/C 9/49 | Case T-573/19: Order of the General Court of 14 October 2020 — DS and Others v Commission and EEAS | 34 |
| 2021/C 9/50 | Case T-576/19: Order of the General Court of 14 October 2020 — DV and Others v Commission | 34 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2021/C 9/02

Case C-644/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 November 2020 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/50/EC — Ambient air quality — Article 13(1) and Annex XI — Systematic and persistent exceedance of limit values for microparticles (PM10) in certain Italian zones and agglomerations — Article 23(1) — Annex XV — Exceedance period to be ‘as short as possible’ — Appropriate measures)

2

2021/C 9/03

Case C-158/20 P: Appeal brought on 7 April 2020 by Jean Whitehead and David Evans against the order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 29 January 2020 in Case T-541/19, Shindler and Others v Council

3

2021/C 9/04

Case C-170/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa (Romania) lodged on 23 April 2020 — SC Novart Engineering SRL v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Municipiul Tulcea

3

2021/C 9/05

Case C-235/20 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by ViaSat, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-734/17, ViaSat v Commission

4

2021/C 9/06

Case C-304/20 P: Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-108/19, Kerry Luxembourg v EUIPO

4

2021/C 9/07

Case C-305/20 P: Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-109/19, Kerry Luxembourg v EUIPO

5

2021/C 9/08

Case C-367/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 6 August 2020 — SP v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Direktion für Deutschland

5

2021/C 9/09

Case C-446/20 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2020 by Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2020 in Case T-616/19, Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

6

2021/C 9/10

Case C-463/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 24 September 2020 — Namur-Est Environnement ASBL v Région wallonne

6

2021/C 9/11

Case C-469/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 29 September 2020 — RightNow GmbH v Wizz Air

7

2021/C 9/12

Case C-471/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Centre d’enseignement secondaire Saint-Vincent de Soignies ASBL v FS

8

2021/C 9/13

Case C-483/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 29 September 2020 — XXXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides

8

2021/C 9/14

Case C-485/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 29 September 2020 — XXXX v HR Rail, SA

9

2021/C 9/15

Case C-505/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 October 2020 — RR and JG, applicants in the context of criminal proceedings

9

2021/C 9/16

Case C-556/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 23 October 2020 — Schneider Electric SA and Others v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance

10

2021/C 9/17

Case C-586/20 P: Appeal brought on 9 November 2020 by P. Krücken Organic GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2020 in Case T-565/18, P. Krücken Organic GmbH v European Commission

P. Krücken Organic GmbH

European Commission

11

General Court

2021/C 9/18

Case T-814/17: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Lietuvos geležinkeliai v Commission (Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Rail freight market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU — Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company — Removal of a section of railway track — Concept of ‘abuse’ — Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor — Calculation of the amount of the fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method for setting fines — Remedies — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)

13

2021/C 9/19

Case T-594/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Pharma Mar v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Aplidin — plitidepsin — Commission decision refusing authorisation — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Scientific evaluation of the risks and benefits of a medicinal product — Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use — Objective impartiality)

13

2021/C 9/20

Case T-25/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — AD v ECHA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contracts — Decision not to renew — Duty of care — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Right to be heard — Duty to state reasons — Liability)

14

2021/C 9/21

Case T-173/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — AV and AW v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Reimbursement of medical expenses — OLAF investigation — Article 85 of the Staff Regulations — Recovery of undue payments)

15

2021/C 9/22

Case T-273/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Target Ventures Group v EUIPO — Target Partners (TARGET VENTURES) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark TARGET VENTURES — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

15

2021/C 9/23

Case T-583/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Electrolux Home Products v EUIPO — D. Consult (FRIGIDAIRE) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark FRIGIDAIRE — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

16

2021/C 9/24

Case T-643/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA — Genuine use of the mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Use with the proprietor’s consent — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

16

2021/C 9/25

Case T-664/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Allergan Holdings France v EUIPO — Dermavita (JUVEDERM ULTRA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA — Genuine use of the mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

17

2021/C 9/26

Case T-820/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — Totalizator Sportowy v EUIPO — Lottoland Holdings (Lottoland) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Lottoland — Earlier national figurative marks LOTTO and Lotto — Earlier national word mark lotto — Declaration of partial invalidity — Relative ground for refusal — No damage to reputation — No link between the marks at issue — Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

18

2021/C 9/27

Case T-857/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Dehousse v Court of Justice of the European Union (Access to documents — Court of Justice of the European Union — Documents held by an institution in the exercise of its administrative functions — Article 266 TFEU — Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court — Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment — Presumption of non-existence or non-possession of documents — Plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession of documents — Obligation to state reasons — Retention of documentation — Principle of good administration)

18

2021/C 9/28

Case T-25/20: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — Deutsche Post v EUIPO Pošta Slovenije (Representation of a stylised horn) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of an EU figurative mark representing a stylised horn — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a post horn on a yellow background — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Lack of distinctive character of the earlier mark — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

19

2021/C 9/29

Case T-629/19: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — L. Oliva Torras v EUIPO — Mecánica del Frío (Vehicle couplings) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a coupling to hitch refrigeration or air conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle — Ground for invalidity — Failure to comply with the requirements for protection — Articles 4 to 9 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal — Pleas in law referring to the grounds of another decision — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

20

2021/C 9/30

Case T-13/20: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — Valiante v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil Service — Officials — Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 (AD 10) — Submission of the application by means of the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Separate application to be admitted to the competition submitted at the same time to the appointing authority — Eligibility criteria — Selection board’s decision rejecting the applicant’s application — Appointing authority’s decision refusing the applicant’s request to disregard one of the conditions set out in the competition notice in order to admit him to the competition — Challenge to the appointing authority’s decision not that of the selection board — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

20

2021/C 9/31

Case T-14/20: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — Tratkowski v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Internal Competition COM/2/AD 12/18 (AD 12) — Submission of the application using the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Request to be admitted to the competition, lodged at the same time and on a separate sheet of paper, to the Appointing Authority — Eligibility conditions — Decision of the selection board to reject the applicant’s application — Rejection by the selection board of the candidate’s request for re-examination due to it being out of time — Decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to grant the applicant’s request to set aside one of the conditions provided for in the notice of competition in order to admit him to the competition — Challenge to the decision of the Appointing Authority and not to that of the selection board — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

21

2021/C 9/32

Case T-38/20: Order of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LOTTO24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

22

2021/C 9/33

Case T-377/20 R II: Order of the President of the General Court of 19 October 2020 — KN v EESC (Application for interim measures — Civil Service — Member of the EESC — Harassment — OLAF investigation — EESC Bureau decision — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — New application — New facts — Lack of urgency)

22

2021/C 9/34

Case T-165/20: Action brought on 30 October 2020 — JC v EUCAP Somalia

23

2021/C 9/35

Case T-630/20: Action brought on 14 October 2020 — MW v Parliament

24

2021/C 9/36

Case T-633/20: Action brought on 9 October 2020 — CNMSE and Others v Parliament and Council

24

2021/C 9/37

Case T-640/20: Action brought on 16 October 2020 — Validity v Commission

25

2021/C 9/38

Case T-645/20: Action brought on 23 October 2020 — NC and Others v Parliament and Council

26

2021/C 9/39

Case T-647/20: Action brought on 21 October 2020 — Verelst v Council

27

2021/C 9/40

Case T-662/20: Action brought on 5 November 2020 — Muratbey Gida v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (Triple helicoid cheese)

28

2021/C 9/41

Case T-663/20: Action brought on 30 October 2020 — One Voice v ECHA

28

2021/C 9/42

Case T-664/20: Action brought on 30 October 2020 — One Voice v ECHA

29

2021/C 9/43

Case T-671/20: Action brought on 9 November 2020 — OA v EESC

30

2021/C 9/44

Case T-672/20: Action brought on 6 November 2020 — Kerstens v Commission

31

2021/C 9/45

Case T-677/20: Action brought on 13 November 2020 — Ryanair and Laudamotion v Commission

31

2021/C 9/46

Case T-689/20: Action brought on 17 November 2020 — HB v EIB

32

2021/C 9/47

Case T-325/19: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2020 — Cipriani v EUIPO — Hotel Cipriani (ARRIGO CIPRIANI)

33

2021/C 9/48

Joined Cases T-389/19 to T-394/19, T-397/19, T-398/19, T-403/19, T-404/19, T-406/19, T-407/19, T-409/19 to T-418/19, T-420/19 to T-422/19, T-425/19 to T-427/19, T-429/29 to T-432/19, T-435/19, T-436/19, T-438/19 to T-442/19, T-444/19 to T-446/19, T-448/19 to T-454/19, T-463/19 and T-465/19: Order of the General Court of 8 October 2020 — Coppo Gavazzi and Others v Parliament

33

2021/C 9/49

Case T-573/19: Order of the General Court of 14 October 2020 — DS and Others v Commission and EEAS

34

2021/C 9/50

Case T-576/19: Order of the General Court of 14 October 2020 — DV and Others v Commission

34

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN