alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DIAMOND v. CITY OF BROOKLYN.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.

December 2, 1895.)

Municipal Corporations—Defective Streets—Proof of Negligence.

The fact that a hole in a cross walk, about two feet long, nine inches-wide, and eight or nine inches deep, existed for a year or more, shows negligence on the part of the city.

Appeal from circuit court, Kings county.

Action by Patrick Diamond against the city of Brooklyn for personal injuries. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before BROWN, P. J., and DYKMAN and PRATT, JJ.

Albert G-. McDonald, for appellant.

Mirabeau D. Towns, for respondent.

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from the order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial on the minutes of the court. The action is based upon negligence, and the facts are these: On the 12th day of April, 1893, the plaintiff was riding on a truck along Flatbush avenue, in the city of Brooklyn. At the corner of Deane street the driver of the truck slackened its speed to almost a standstill, to allow the plaintiff to alight. The plaintiff stepped down upon the ground, on his right foot, at the same time holding on to the rung of the truck with Ms *98right hand. He had reached the ground, and, turning around, he stepped into a hole in the cross walk with his left foot, causing him to fall down and break his leg. The hole was about 2 feet long, 9 inches wide, and 8 or 9 inches deep, and had been there for a year or more. As a result of these injuries, the plaintiff was confined to the hospital and to his house, and was unable to engage in his work, for a period of about four months. The injury to his leg had the effect to shorten it an inch or more, making it weak, and rendering him unable to earn the same wages that he did before he received the injury. In this class of cases, the plaintiff is bound to show by a preponderance of evidence the negligence of the defendant, and his own freedom therefrom as a contribution to the result. The plaintiff sustained the burden which the law cast upon him in this case, and the charge of the trial judge submitted the question involved to the jury. The verdict in favor of the plaintiff under the charge establishes the facts in favor of the plaintiff, and the record presents no errors of law.

The judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          46,838
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                      927
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     74,936
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,365
<PP&E>                                          24,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,053
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,120
<SALES>                                        127,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,417
<CGS>                                           89,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,153
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,538
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,615
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Early AD Pathological Mechanisms.                    

*Date:*                         October 8, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Birgit Neuhuber, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-480-1266                         *neuhuber@ninds.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 40603)    
Dated: July 23, 2021. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-16073 Filed 7-27-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Case: 1:01-cv-00585 Document #: 30 Filed: 10/09/01 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:91
#### George Lianopolous et al., Appellants, v Church of Our Savior, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.), entered January 25, 1984, which, upon a jury verdict, apportioned liability 60% against the plaintiff George Lianopolous and 40% against the defendant.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs.

Res ipsa loquitur may be charged to the jury if the facts, as established by the plaintiffs’ evidence, would permit an inference of negligence on that theory *(Cornacchia v Mount Vernon Hosp.,*93 AD2d 851). At trial, plaintiffs introduced evidence of specific acts of negligence, as well as circumstances from which negligence could be inferred. Defendant produced evidence tending to show that plaintiff George Lianopolous’ own culpable conduct caused his accident. Under these circumstances, it was not error for the court to charge the jury on the issue of Mr. Lianopolous’ culpable conduct, in addition to the res ipsa loquitur theory. The jury verdict was amply supported by the evidence. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of Purchase Point Media Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Albert Folsom, President
      and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      October 13, 2006














BY: /s/
      Albert Folsom


Albert
      Folsom, President and Chief


Financial
      Officer