alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Karen Littleton, Respondent, v Amberland Owners, Inc., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. McKinney Landscaping Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (And a Second Third-Party Action.)

[942 NYS2d 586]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (O. Bellantoni, J.), dated December 9, 2010, which granted the motion of the third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she slipped and fell on ice on stairs in the parking lot of her apartment complex, which was owned by the defendant/third-party plaintiff, Amberland Owners, Inc. (hereinafter Amberland). The plaintiff commenced this action against Amberland to recover damages for personal injuries, and Amberland subsequently commenced a third-party action against the third-party defendant, McKinney Landscaping Corporation (hereinafter McKinney), its snow removal contractor, for common-law contribution and indemnification.

The Supreme Court properly granted McKinney’s motion for *954summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. McKinney established, prima facie, that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the common-law indemnification claim by demonstrating that the plaintiffs accident was not due solely to its negligent performance or nonperformance of an act solely within its province *(see Schultz v Bridgeport & Port Jefferson Steamboat Co.,*68 AD3d 970, 972 [2009]). In opposition, Amberland failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Furthermore, in opposition to the prima facie showing by McKinney that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the common-law contribution claim, Amberland failed to demonstrate either that McKinney owed Amberland a duty of care independent of its contractual obligations, or that McKinney owed the plaintiff a duty of care *(see Foster v Herbert Slepoy Corp.,*76 AD3d 210, 216 [2010]; *Schultz v Bridgeport & Port Jefferson Steamboat Co.,*68 AD3d at 972).

The Supreme Court properly denied Amberland’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. “A real property owner or a party in possession or control of real property will be held liable for injuries sustained in a slip-and-fall accident involving snow and ice on its property only when it created the alleged dangerous condition or had actual or constructive notice of it” *(Cantwell v Fox Hill Community Assn., Inc.,*87 AD3d 1106 [2011]). Here, Amberland failed to establish, prima facie, that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition. Since Amberland failed to meet its initial burden of establishing its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition papers need not be considered *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Rivera, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with this Annual Report of Nordic American Tanker Shipping Limited. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Turid M. Sørensen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.








Date:  April 21, 2011








/s/ Turid M. Sørensen


Turid M. Sørensen


Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-186533, 333-169926, 333-150097, 333-136316, and 333-100900) of our reports dated March 5, 2014 on (i) the consolidated financial statements of MedallionFinancial Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013 and on the selected financial ratios and other data for each of the five years in thefive-year period ended December 31, 2013, and the consolidated schedules of investments in and advances to affiliates as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012; (ii) the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2013; (iii) the financial statements of Medallion Bank as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013; and (iv) the consolidatedschedules of investments as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, all of which appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medallion Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2013. 

/s/ WeiserMazars LLP 

New York, New York 

March 5, 2014 

 
69
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Eric Skolnik,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc., certify that:

1.       I
have reviewed this amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc.; and

2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.

|                     |                                                                                                                                                               
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2018 | /s/ Eric Skolnik                                                                                                                                              
|                     | Eric SkolnikSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

** **

The undersigned, Randall Letcavage, herebycertifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Premier Holding Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2016 fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Premier Holding Corporation.

 

By: */s/ Randall Letcavage          *

Randall Letcavage

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 14, 2016
#### Il Chung Lim, Appellant, v Michal K. Chrabaszcz, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 236]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Siegal, J.), entered April 5, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although the plaintiff alleged that he sustained certain *951injuries to his left knee as a result of the subject accident, the defendant submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that those alleged injuries did not constitute a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and, in any event, were not caused by the subject accident but, instead, were degenerative in nature *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Torres v Posy,*92 AD3d 676 [2012]; *Jilani v Palmer,*83 AD3d 786 [2011]; *Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]).

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The approximate 13% limitation in range of motion of the left knee noted by the plaintiff’s treating physician, Dr. Benjamin Chang, on his most recent examination of the plaintiff on December 3, 2010, was insignificant within the meaning of the no-fault statute *(see McLoud v Reyes,*82 AD3d 848, 849 [2011]). In any event, the plaintiffs submissions were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact to rebut the finding of the defendant’s radiologist that the injuries depicted in the magnetic resonance imaging (hereinafter MRI) films of his left knee were degenerative in nature and unrelated to the subject accident. Neither the plaintiffs radiologist nor Dr. Chang addressed the findings of the defendant’s radiologist pertaining to the degenerative nature of the plaintiffs left knee injuries, and Dr. Chang’s conclusion that, based upon a review of the uncertified MRI report, the subject injuries were caused by the accident and were not degenerative in nature, was speculative and insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Mensah v Badu,*68 AD3d 945, 946 [2009]; *Ortega v Maldonado,*38 AD3d 388 [2007]).

Finally, the plaintiff failed to submit competent medical evidence that the injuries he allegedly sustained as a result of the subject accident rendered him unable to perform substantially all of his daily activities for not less than 90 days of the first 180 days thereafter *(see Mensah v Badu,*68 AD3d at 946). The plaintiff admitted in his supplemental bill of particulars that he was incapacitated as a result of the accident for only two days. He further failed to dispute his admission to the defendant’s orthopedist that the accident caused him to lose only two days of work as a limousine driver.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 30745(U).]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1900

VALERY V. CEASAR, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

NANCY A. NORD, Acting Chairman, U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. 

(8:07-cv-02641-RWT) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

John F. Mercer, MERCER LAW ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Washington, D.C., 

for Appellant. Michael Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, 

Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Marleigh D. Dover, 

Melissa N. Patterson, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Valery V. Ceasar appeals the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment to Defendants on her claims of 

retaliation and employment discrimination. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Ceasar v. Nord, No. 

8:07-cv-02641-RWT (D. Md. July 18, 2008). We grant Appellees’ 

motion to file a supplemental appendix. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00058-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH CURTIS ANDREWS, DECEASED,

Appellant

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-04-0239-CVW

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are assessed against Vincent Doebbler. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4.

SIGNED June 9, 2021.

_____________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
ARS HomePacific West AreaDavis, CaliforniaNat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & GrapesDocsOrder Form

----

ARS-wide
- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
At this Location
- People

| PandP |
|-------|
|       |

**National Clonal Germplasm Repository****                  
University of California - Davis 
One Shields Avenue
Davis, CA95616-8607
Phone: 530-752-6504     Fax:  530-752-5974        Date                                  Page         of 
**Plant Material Request Form**
 
**Ordered By:                                                           Ship To:
 
_______________________________________        _____________________________________

Name and/or Name of Organization or Business        Name and/or Name of Organization or Business
 
_______________________________________        _____________________________________

Address                                                                 Mailing Address
 
_______________________________________        _____________________________________

City, State, Zip Code                                               City, State, Zip Code
 
_______________________________________        _____________________________________

Phone # / Fax # / Email Address                             Phone # / Fax # / Email Address
 
*For shipping purposes, a phone number must be included.
 
**Accession #
**Genus
**Species
**Cultivar
**Form*
1
 
 
 
 
 
2
 
 
 
 
 
3
 
 
 
 
 
4
 
 
 
 
 
5
 
 
 
 
 
6
 
 
 
 
 
7
 
 
 
 
 
8
 
 
 
 
 
9
 
 
 
 
 
10
 
 
 
 
 
11
 
 
 
 
 
12
 
 
 
 
 
13
 
 
 
 
 
14
 
 
 
 
 
15
 
 
 
 
 
16
 
 
 
 
 
17
 
 
 
 
 
**Special Instruction:
*Indicate dormant cuttings, budwood/scionwood, or summer cuttings.  Please use accession numbers when ordering material.  Orders for dormant cuttings or budwood/scionwood must be **received by DECEMBER 1**.  Dormant wood is shipped in January/February.  Orders for summer budwood/cuttings and open-pollinated seeds must be received by **MAY 1**.  Summer wood is shipped in July/August depending on wood readiness.  **Note**:  Walnut and Wingnut wood is only sent out in the winter due to propagation constraints with green cuttings.  Mulberry and pomegranate summer wood requires propagation under mist.
 
**NOTICE:  WE WILL NOT HONOR LATE REQUESTS!!!**Return to top                Last Modified:6/26/2018            Connect with ARSSign up-  ARS Home 
-  USDA.gov 
-  Plain Writing 
-  Policies & Links 
-  Civil Rights Statements 
-  FOIA 
-  Accessibility Statement 
-  Privacy Policy 
-  Non-Discrimination Statement 
-  Quality of Information 
-  USA.gov 
-  WhiteHouse.gov****************
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 140 (Monday, July 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15893]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 25, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Nicolet Bankshares, Inc., Green Bay, Wisconsin; to merge with 
County Bancorp Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Investors Community 
Bank, both of Manitowoc, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 21, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-15893 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Periodic Report**     Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officerof Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the undersigned’sknowledge: (1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 8, 2007                                                     /s/ Terrance D. Paul   Name:  Terrance D. Paul   Title:  Chief Executive Officer   THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 192 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 192

      Designating May 21, 2011, as ``National Kids to Parks Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2011

  Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself, Mr. Burr, Mr. Bingaman, and Ms. 
Murkowski) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Designating May 21, 2011, as ``National Kids to Parks Day''.

Whereas the first National Kids to Parks Day will be celebrated on May 21, 2011;
Whereas the goal of National Kids to Parks Day is to empower young people and 
        encourage families to get outdoors and visit the parks of the United 
        States;
Whereas on National Kids to Parks Day, rural and urban Americans alike can be 
        reintroduced to the splendid National, State, and neighborhood parks 
        that are located in their communities;
Whereas communities across the United States offer a variety of natural 
        resources and public land, often with free access, to individuals 
        seeking outdoor recreation;
Whereas the United States should encourage young people to lead a more active 
        lifestyle, as too many young people in the United States are overweight 
        or obese;
Whereas National Kids to Parks Day is an opportunity for families to take a 
        break from their busy lives and come together for a day of wholesome 
        fun; and
Whereas National Kids to Parks Day aims to broaden the appreciation of young 
        people for nature and the outdoors: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates May 21, 2011, as ``National Kids to Parks 
        Day'';
            (2) recognizes the importance of outdoor recreation and the 
        preservation of open spaces to the health of the young people 
        of the United States; and
            (3) calls on the people of the United States to observe the 
        day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 140 (Monday, July 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2063]


Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations for Bay County, Florida and 
Incorporated Areas

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing 
its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations, 
which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood 
Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone 
designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as 
proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps 
and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports 
for Bay County, Florida and Incorporated Areas.

DATES: This withdrawal is July 26, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
2063, to Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal 
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email) 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f5e4f1f7ece6eeabf6e4e6e7ece7ecf1c5e3e0e8e4abe1edf6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="becedfcaccd7ddd590cddfdddcd7dcd7cafed8dbd3df90dad6cd90d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering 
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email) 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4d4c5d0d6cdc7cf8ad7c5c7c6cdc6cdd0e4c2c1c9c58ac0ccd78ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a3a2b3e3823292164392b29282328233e0a2c2f272b642e2239642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 18, 2020, FEMA published a 
proposed notice at 85 FR 73502, proposing flood hazard determinations 
for Bay County, Florida and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing the 
proposed notice.
    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland 
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-15867 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>