alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 49 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 49

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2012

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Alan Spoon of Massachusetts on 
May 5, 2012, is filled by the appointment of Barbara Barrett of 
Arizona. The appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on the 
later of May 5, 2012, or the date of the enactment of this joint 
resolution.

            Passed the Senate August 1, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit 31.1**
  ENTRADA NETWORKS, INC.
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 RULE 13-A-14 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 
 
 I, Kanwar J.S. Chadha, Ph. D., certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Entrada Networks, Inc;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure the material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 104 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and
 
 (c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 6.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 Date: May 14, 2004/s/ Kanwar J.S. Chadha,Kanwar J.S. Chadha, Ph. D.Chief Executive Officer
# C_2019295EN.01004901.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/49

---

Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Sbarbati v Parliament

(Case T-424/19)

(2019/C 295/63)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luciana Sbarbati (Chiaravalle, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;

| — | order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.

---
# L_2014154EN.01004401.xml

| 22.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/44

---

NOTE TO THE READER

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 227/2013 has been withdrawn prior to adoption and is therefore blank.

---
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

In re: § Case No.

§

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE'S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Mowatt, Oswald V 10 B 00067

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

§

§

Debtor

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

 1) The case was filed on 01/04/2010.

 2) The plan was confirmed on (NA).

 3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 

on (NA).

 4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the

plan on (NA).

 5) The case was dismissed on 03/02/2010.

 6) Number of months from filing or conversion to last payment: 0.

 7) Number of months case was pending: 3.

 8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: (NA).

 9) Total value of assets exempted: $0.00.

 10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without full payment: $0.

 11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank. 

EASTERN DIVISION

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00067 Doc 21 Filed 04/13/10 Entered 04/13/10 17:44:46 Desc Page 1

 of 4
Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor

Receipts:

$0

Less amount refunded to debtor $0

NET RECEIPTS: $0

Attorney's Fees Paid Through the Plan

Expenses of Administration:

$0

Court Costs $0

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0

Other $0

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Int.

Paid

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Principal

Paid

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00067 Doc 21 Filed 04/13/10 Entered 04/13/10 17:44:46 Desc Page 2

 of 4
Mortgage Ongoing

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

$0

Interest

Paid

Claim

Allowed

Principal

Paid

Secured Payments:

$0 $0

Mortgage Arrearage $0 $0 $0

Debt Secured by Vehicle $0 $0 $0

All Other Secured $0 $0 $0

TOTAL SECURED: $0 $0 $0

Domestic Support Arrearage $0

Priority Unsecured Payments:

$0 $0

Domestic Support Ongoing $0 $0 $0

All Other Priority $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PRIORITY: $0 $0 $0

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS: $0 $0 $0

Expenses of Administration

Disbursements:

$0

Disbursements to Creditors $0

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: $0

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00067 Doc 21 Filed 04/13/10 Entered 04/13/10 17:44:46 Desc Page 3

 of 4
 This Uniform Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork 

Reduction Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies. 

STATEMENT:

 12) The trustee certifies that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5009, the

estate has been fully administered, the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all administrative

matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee requests a final decree

be entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may be just and proper. 

Date: April 13, 2010

Trustee

By:

/s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 10-00067 Doc 21 Filed 04/13/10 Entered 04/13/10 17:44:46 Desc Page 4

 of 4
irt-ex101_27.htm



Exhibit 10.1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) expects to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc. (“Steadfast”), and certain other parties named therein, whereby (1) Steadfast will be merged with and into IRSTAR Sub, LLC, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“IRT Merger Sub”), with IRT Merger Sub surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Company Merger”), and (2) immediately following the Company Merger, Steadfast Apartment REIT Operating Partnership, L.P. will be merged with and into Independence Realty Operating Partnership, LP (“IRT OP”), with IRT OP surviving (the “Partnership Merger” and, together with the Company Merger, the “Mergers”).

 

_______ (the “Executive”) holds certain equity awards (the “Outstanding Awards”) issued to him or her by the Company under the Independence Realty Trust, Inc. 2016 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”).  The Company has concluded that the Mergers, if consummated, will not constitute a “Change in Control” under the Incentive Plan and has asked the Executive to acknowledge that conclusion by executing this Acknowledgement.

 

Accordingly, the Executive hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Mergers, if consummated, will not constitute a “Change in Control” under the Incentive Plan and, therefore, provisions of the Outstanding Awards and the Incentive Plan pertaining to Change in Control will not be implicated by the Mergers.

 

Intending to be legally bound hereby, the Executive has executed this Acknowledgement on July ____, 2021.

 

 

EXECUTIVE:

 

 

_______________________________

[Name]
#### In re Murray WINDMAN and Pauline Windman, Debtors. Arthur G. Lawrence, Appellant, v. United States Trustee, Appellee.

No. 09-60055.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 9, 2011.

Filed July 14, 2011.

Lorraine Gladys Howell, Law Offices of Lorraine Howell, Newport Beach, CA, for Appellant.

Arthur G. Lawrence, Rosemead, CA, pro se.

Russell Clementson, Kenneth G. Lau, Esquire, Trial, Office of the United States Trustee, Los Angeles, CA, Catherine Bentley Sevcenko, Esquire, Executive Office for U.S. Trustees, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, IKUTA, Circuit Judge, and PIERSOL, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, Senior District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

The bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to order disgorgement of Lawrence’s fees for both bankruptcy filings. *See Tsafaroff v. Taylor (In re Taylor),*884 F.2d 478, 481 (9th Cir.1989). The court didn’t abuse its discretion by reducing those fees, as there *360was sufficient evidence that Lawrence’s filings were incomplete and the associated cases dismissed. Nor did the court abuse its discretion in ordering disgorgement of any fees partially billed for services pertaining to the state court proceedings, as neither the state court representation nor the fees therefor had been authorized by the court. The bankruptcy court also reasonably found those services deficient, especially given that his license was suspended before the state court matter was resolved. Lawrence misstates the record when he claims that the bankruptcy judge gave him only five minutes to oppose disgorgement: The judge permitted long statements from him before limiting him to “five *more*minutes.” (Emphasis added.) Finally, Pauline Windman’s preferences can’t moot the disgorgement order. *See*11 U.S.C. §§ 329(b), 330(a).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          43,495
<SECURITIES>                                    39,309
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (710)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,894
<PP&E>                                           4,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,510)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,030
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           425
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,950
<SALES>                                         33,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,977
<CGS>                                            6,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   294
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (23,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (160)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (23,023)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (23,023)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.70)
        

</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00458-CV

In the Interest of K.B., a Child

On appeal from the

279th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F-198,952-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The Court 

orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION in accordance with its 

opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant although she is exempt 

from payment due to her affidavit of inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 21, 2016
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 2 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 3 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 4 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 5 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 6 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 7 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 8 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 9 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 10 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 11 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 12 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 13 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 14 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 15 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 16 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 17 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 18 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 19 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 20 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 21 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 22 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 23 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cr-00947 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/02 Page 24 of 24 PageID #:1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 18

August 1, 1997

To the Board of Directors of Decorative Home Accents, Inc.

Dear Directors:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Decorative Home
Accents, Inc. ("the Company") as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, included in your Annual
Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued
our report thereon dated June 20, 1997 (July 9, 1997 as to Note 14).  Note 3 to
such financial statements describes a change in the Company's method of
evaluating the recoverability of goodwill from an undiscounted projected cash
flow approach to a fair value method using discounted projected cash flows.  In
our judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that is
preferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Greenville, South Carolina
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,633
<SECURITIES>                                    79,830
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,055
<INVENTORY>                                      2,757
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         700,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                 311,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,231,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,319,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                    (233,792)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,231,017
<SALES>                                        397,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               397,318
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  341,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,671
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (142,219)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,941
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (128,278)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,484)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (130,762)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 22 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.22

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                            Joint Resolution

 
To grant the consent of Congress to an amendment to the compact between 
 the States of Missouri and Illinois providing that bonds issued by the 
    Bi-State Development Agency may mature in not to exceed 40 years.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That

SECTION 1. CONSENT.

    (a) In General.--The consent of Congress is given to the amendment 
of the powers conferred on the Bi-State Development Agency by Senate 
Bill 758, Laws of Missouri 2010 and Public Act 96-1520 (Senate Bill 
3342), Laws of Illinois 2010.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment to the powers conferred by the 
Acts consented to in subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF ACT OF AUGUST 31, 1950.

    The provisions of the Act of August 31, 1950 (64 Stat. 568) shall 
apply to the amendment approved under this joint resolution to the same 
extent as if such amendment was conferred under the provisions of the 
compact consented to in such Act.

SEC. 3. RIGHT TO ALTER, AMEND, OR REPEAL.

    The right to alter, amend, or repeal this joint resolution is 
expressly reserved.

SEC. 4. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS.

    The right is reserved to Congress to require the disclosure and 
furnishings of such information or data by the Bi-State Development 
Agency as is deemed appropriate by Congress.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```