alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020262EN.01002501.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/25

---

Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — VDV eTicket Service v Commission and INEA

(Case T-516/19) (1)

(Arbitration clause - ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’ (2014-2020) - Project ‘European Travellers Club: Account-Based Travelling across the European Union — ETC’ - Grant agreement - Decision of INEA declaring ineligible certain costs incurred in the context of subcontracts - Misidentification of the defendant - Measure which is part of a purely contractual context from which it is inseparable - Legitimate expectations - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 262/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: VDV eTicket Service GmbH & Co. KG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Bartosch, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: R. Pethke and M. Siekierzyńska, acting as Agents), Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (represented by: I. Ramallo and P. Rosa Plaza, acting as Agents, and R. van der Hout and C. Wagner, lawyers)

Re:

First, application under Article 272 TFEU seeking a declaration that INEA’s failure to acknowledge, in its letter Ares(2019)3151305 of 13 May 2019, costs in the amount of EUR 407 443,04 in the context of the Horizon 2020 programme, is unlawful, and second and in the alternative, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of that letter in so far as it declared ineligible the costs in that amount.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed in part as inadmissible and in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed in part as inadmissible and in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | VDV eTicket Service GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

VDV eTicket Service GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 23.9.2019.

---
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 178 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2011, as ‘‘Silver Star 

Service Banner Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2011 

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself and Mr. BLUNT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2011, 

as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the Armed Forces and veterans 

who were wounded or became ill in combat in the wars 

fought by the United States; 

Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to 

help the American people remember the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces by 

designing and manufacturing Silver Star Service Banners 

and Silver Star Flags for that purpose; 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 178 ATS 

Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of 

America is to evoke memories of the sacrifices of members and veterans of the Armed Forces on behalf of the 

United States through the presence of a Silver Star Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying; 

Whereas the sacrifices of members and veterans of the Armed 

Forces on behalf of the United States should never be 

forgotten; and 

Whereas May 1, 2011, is an appropriate date to designate as 

‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation 

2 of May 1, 2011, as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’ and 

3 calls upon the people of the United States to observe the 

4 day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.02 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Mark R. Kent, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that based upon a review of the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Transmeta Corporation, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Form 10-K), the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transmeta
Corporation for the annual period covered by the Form 10-K. Date: March 28, 2005
By: /s/ Mark R. Kent
Chief Financial Officer,
Transmeta Corporation A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Transmeta Corporation and will be retained by Transmeta Corporation and furnished to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGED UNETHICAL CONDUCT OF G. WILLIAM PATTON, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

Argued April 10, 1960

Decided June 28, 1960.

Por the order *Mr. George A. Streiiz.*

Por the respondent *Mr. Lawrence N. Parle.*

The opinion was delivered

Per Curiam.

Respondent was retained by Mr. and Mrs. Wallis to represent them in the purchase of a home in Delaware Township from one Mitchell. A contract of sale was made, and on October 11, 1958 Mr. and Mrs. Wallis delivered their check for $8,000 to respondent to be held in escrow for use in the purchase. The moneys were deposited in a checking account entitled “G. William Patton, Mitchell Escrow Account.” Within a matter of a few weeks, respondent began to convert the moneys to his own use. By *97eighteen withdrawals between October 30, 1958 and April 24, 1959, he depleted the account.

Shortly after the deposit, Mr. Wallis left for California on a temporary assignment by his employer. The sale of course was never concluded. The clients sought futilely to have respondent complete the deal. Ultimately they retained other counsel and made a complaint before the Ethics and Grievance Committee.

Respondent did not answer the complaint. He failed to appear at the time fixed for hearing. To afford every opportunity to be heard, the committee sought out respondent who then attended. At the hearing, respondent seemed to content himself with the irrelevant question whether his clients had perfected a demand upon him to return the moneys. Of course he had misappropriated the trust fund, and that was the basic charge. Restitution would be but an ameliorating circumstance, and respondent hardly needed advice that his clients would want him to disgorge, had they known of the offense against them. At any rate, respondent failed to comply with the explicit demand of the counsel later retained by Mr. and Mrs. Wallis, and as of the time of the hearing before the ethics committee, no part of the moneys had been returned. Thereafter an adjustment was •made, the last payment occurring on the morning of the argument before us.

The offense itself, of serious proportions, was aggravated by other circumstances. Respondent added deception to his mistreatment of his clients, and exhibited a callousness, indifference, or lack of appreciation of the immorality of his misconduct. The total facts convinced us that respondent could not remain a member of the bar with safety to the public. We obtained a report from the local probation office in search of circumstances which might suggest a lesser course would be justifiable. We could find none.

The name of respondent will be stricken from the roll of attorneys-at-law.

*98
      *For disbarment*— Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Eranois, Proctor, Hall and Schettino — 6.

*Opposed*— None.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 212 

Congratulating the people and Government of the Republic of Slovenia on 

the twentieth anniversary of the country’s independence. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21 (legislative day, JUNE 16), 2011 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. BARRASSO, 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio, and Mr. PORTMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the people and Government of the Republic 

of Slovenia on the twentieth anniversary of the country’s 

independence. 

Whereas, on December 23, 1990, the people of Slovenia voted 

overwhelmingly in favor of independence from the former 

Yugoslavia in a national referendum; 

Whereas, on June 25, 1991, the Republic of Slovenia declared itself as an independent and sovereign nation; 

Whereas, on December 23, 1991, the parliament of Slovenia 

adopted a constitution based on the rule of law, respect 

for human rights, and democratic ideals; 

Whereas, during its 20 years of independence, Slovenia has 

been an important United States ally in Central Europe 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 212 ATS 

and a strong advocate of democracy, the rule of law, and 

the merits of an open, free market economy; 

Whereas the Government of Slovenia has made important 

contributions to international efforts to promote peace, 

stability, and development in Southeast Europe, Afghanistan, and elsewhere; 

Whereas the Government of Slovenia serves as a leader in efforts to remove destructive land mines in parts of Southeast Europe and in other parts of the world; 

Whereas Slovenia has become an active member of international organizations, including the United Nations, the 

Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the 

Council of Europe, the World Trade Organization, the 

European Union, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and 

Development; and 

Whereas Slovenia has further consolidated its international 

role through successful chairmanship of the Organization 

for Security and Cooperation in Europe in 2005, and, as 

the first new member from Central and Eastern Europe, 

the presidency of the Council of the European Union in 

2008: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate hereby— 

2 (1) congratulates the people and the Govern3 ment of the Republic of Slovenia as the country cele4 brates 20 years of independence on June 25, 2011; 

5 (2) commends the people of Slovenia on the sig6 nificant progress made in the last 20 years; 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 212 ATS 

1 (3) recognizes the important role of the Slove2 nian community in the United States to promote 

3 partnership and cooperation between the two coun4 tries; and 

5 (4) encourages the Government of the Republic 

6 of Slovenia to continue its important work in the 

7 transatlantic alliance, and the efforts to further 

8 peace, stability, and prosperity in Southeast Europe 

9 and elsewhere. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        233,286
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      4,602,277
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   544,419
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      2,702,529
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        2,798,350
<LOANS>                                    13,959,706
<ALLOWANCE>                                    60,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             22,879,066
<DEPOSITS>                                 15,574,065
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           635,567
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        4,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  6,665,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             22,879,066
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               883,195
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             187,092
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              207,283
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            1,277,570
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            576,122
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            576,122
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         701,448
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               469,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               240,985
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    240,985
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  145,365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.64
<LOANS-NON>                                         0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    0       
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              60,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           60,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

*Docket Numbers:* CP21-475-000.

*Applicants:* NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC, and Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.

*Description:* Joint Abbreviated Application of NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC, and Texas Eastern Transmission, LP, for Amendment to Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and Authorization to Abandon by Lease.

*Filed Date:* 7/20/21.

*Accession Number:* 20210720-5093.

*Comments Due:* 5 p.m. ET 8/3/21.

*Docket Numbers:* RP20-1097-002.

*Applicants:* Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC.

*Description:* Compliance filing Request for Rejection of Filed Tariff Records.

*Filed Date:* 7/22/21.

*Accession Number:* 20210722-5089.

*Comments Due:* 5 p.m. ET 8/3/21.

The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (*https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.* For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Dated: July 26, 2021.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-16268 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2019363EN.01003501.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/35

---

Action brought on 16 September 2019 – ArcelorMittal Bremen v Commission

(Case T-623/19)

(2019/C 363/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and L. Buschmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | declare, pursuant to Article 265 TFEU, that the Commission infringed the second subparagraph of Article 19(4) of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU (1) by failing to decide on the total annual amount of emission allowances allocated free of charge for a significant capacity extension of the product benchmark sub-installation for hot metal of the installation (Installation ID 60) in Bremen, communicated to it by the Federal Republic of Germany on 12 April 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare, pursuant to Article 265 TFEU, that the Commission infringed the second subparagraph of Article 19(4) of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU (1) by failing to decide on the total annual amount of emission allowances allocated free of charge for a significant capacity extension of the product benchmark sub-installation for hot metal of the installation (Installation ID 60) in Bremen, communicated to it by the Federal Republic of Germany on 12 April 2019;

| — | alternatively, annul the Commission’s decision of 19 July 2019 on the applicant’s request of 12 April 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, annul the Commission’s decision of 19 July 2019 on the applicant’s request of 12 April 2019;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following plea in law.

| | The applicant submits that the Commission is obliged to adopt a decision pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 19(4) of Decision 2011/278/EU and not to reject the total annual amount of emission allowances allocated free of charge for a significant capacity extension, communicated to it by the Federal Republic of Germany on 12 April 2019, since the requirements for a significant capacity extension within the meaning of Article 20(1) of Decision 2011/278/EU are met. |
| --- | --- |

The applicant submits that the Commission is obliged to adopt a decision pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 19(4) of Decision 2011/278/EU and not to reject the total annual amount of emission allowances allocated free of charge for a significant capacity extension, communicated to it by the Federal Republic of Germany on 12 April 2019, since the requirements for a significant capacity extension within the meaning of Article 20(1) of Decision 2011/278/EU are met.

---

(1)  Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 130, p. 1).

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00648-CR

Edward Nathaniel Miller, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3013028, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

Edward Nathaniel Miller seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction for aggravated robbery. 

Sentence was imposed on August 21, 2002. The deadline for filing a motion for new trial was therefore 

September 20, 2002. Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a). The motion for new trial was filed October 3, 2002. 

Because the motion for new trial was not timely, the notice of appeal filed October 3 was not timely. Tex. 

R. App. P. 26.2(a). Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in 

any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
2

The appeal is dismissed.

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: November 7, 2002 

Do Not Publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11470]

                    The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation will meet on August 30, 2021 in a virtual open session to discuss the status of the production of the                     *Foreign Relations*                     series and any other matters of concern to the Committee.                

                    The Committee will meet in open session from 10:00 a.m. until noon through a virtual platform TBD. Members of the public planning to attend the virtual meeting should RSVP to Julie Fort at                     *FortJL@state.gov.*                     RSVP and requests for reasonable accommodation should be sent not later than August 13, 2021. The platform type and instructions on how to join the virtual meeting will be provided upon receipt of RSVP. Note that requests for reasonable accommodation received after August 13 will be considered but might not be possible to fulfill.                

                    Questions concerning the meeting should be directed to Adam M. Howard, Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, Department of State,                           ( print page 38789)                        Office of the Historian, Washington, DC 20372,                     *history@state.gov.*

Adam M. Howard,

Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical, Diplomatic Documentation. 

[FR Doc. 2021-15558 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-34-P