T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. JO S E A N G E L G A L A V IZ , a. k . a. Jo se G al avi z, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 50319 D. C . No . 2 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 5 9 5 - AG ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A ndr e w J . G ui l f

or d, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r27, 2011 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , S IL V E R M A N , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J o s e A n g e l G a la v iz ap p e a ls f r o m h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n a n d3 7 - m o n th s e nt e nc e f

orbe i ng a n i l l e ga l a l i e n f ound i n the U ni t e d S t a t e s f ol l ow i ng de port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of

8 U . S . C . § 1326. P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 

# FI LED OC T 03 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50319 2 (196 7), G al avi z’ s c ou nselhas f i l ed a bri ef

st at i ng there ar e no g roun ds for r el i ef , a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr aw a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d the ap p el l an tw i th th e o p p o rtu n i ty t o fi l e a p ro se sup p l em en t al b ri ef. N o p ro se s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f

ora ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. G a l a vi z w a i ve d hi s r i ghtt o appe a l hi s s e nt e nc e w i th the e xc e pt i on of the c ourt ’ s c a l c ul a t i on of

hi s c r i m i na l hi s t oryc a t e gory . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 488 U . S . 75, 80- 81 ( 1988) , di s c l os e s no a r guabl e gr ounds f

orr e l i e f a s t o the de f

e nda nt ’ s c onvi c t i on and i ndi c a t e s tha tthe ap p e a l w a iv e ris o p e r a tiv e . A c c o r d in g ly , w e d is m is s th e ap p e a l o f th e s e n te n c e in p a rt. See U

ni ted States v. N

gu ye n , 2 3 5 F .3 d1 1 7 9 , 1 1 8 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . W ith r e gar d t o the c ourt ’ s c a l c ul a t i on of the c r i m i na l hi s t oryc a t e gory , ouri nde pe nde nt r e vi e w of

the r e c or d di s c l os e s no a r guabl e gr ounds f orr e l i e f on di r e c tappe a l , and w e a f f i rm. I n a c c or danc e w i th U

ni ted States v. R i ve ra-San chez , 222 F . 3d 1057, 1062 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , w e r e m an dth e c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w ith in s tru c tio n s th a t it d e le te f r o m th e ju d g m e n t th e in c o rr e c t r e f e r e n c e to 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) . See U ni ted10- 50319 3 States v. H

erre ra-B lan co , 2 3 2 F .3 d7 1 5 , 7 1 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( r e m an d in g s u as p o n te t o d el et e the re fe re nce t o § 13 26 (b)) . C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. A FFI R M ED in p art; D I SM I SSED in p art; RE MAND E D t o c orr e c tthe ju d g m e n t.