T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AC I NT O JUA N C AR HU AZ RODRI GU EZ , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74048 A ge nc yN o. A 099- 340- 903 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T R O T T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a c i nt o Juan C arhua z R odr i gue z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of P e ru, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um 

# FI LED NO V 26 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74048 2 a n dw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. O u rju r is d ic tio n is g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f law a n df

o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f a c tu a l f in d in g s . H usye v v . Mukasey , 528 F . 3d 1172, 1177 ( 9th C i r . 2008) . W e di s m i s s i n parta nd d e n yi n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. C a rh u a z R o d r ig u e z c h a lle n g e s th e a g e n c y ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t h e f a ile dto e s t abl i s h e xtr a or di naryc i r c um s t anc e s e xc us i ng hi s unt i m e l yf i l e d a s y l um appl i cat i on on the basi s of D r. L oR é’ s e vi dence and hi s ow n t es t i m on y. W e l ac k ju risd icti o n to re v iew h is co n ten ti o n s r eg ar d in g th e I J’s a n alys is o f D r. L o R é’s e vi de nc e be c aus e the a ge nc y ’ s f i ndi ng w a s ba s e d on di s put e d f a c t s r e gar di ng C a rh u a z R o d r ig u e z ’s m e n ta l c o n d itio n , se e 8 U .S .C . § 1 1 5 8 ( a ) ( 3 ) ; cf . H usye v , 528 F . 3d at11 78 -81 (exerc i si ng j uri sdi ct i on t o con si der one-ye arbar w here fa ct s w er e undi s put e d) , a nd be c aus e C arhua z R odr i gue z f a i l e d t o r a i s e hi s c ont e nt i ons r e g a r d in g c o n f

r o n ta tio n a n dr e c a ll p r o b le m s to th e B I A , se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( no j uri sdi ct i on ov ercl ai m s notpres ent ed be l ow ) . F urthe r , C arhua z R odr i gue z ’ s t e s t i m onydoe s notothe rw i s e c om pe l the c o n c lu s io n th a t h e e s tab lis h e de x tr a o r d in aryc ir c u m s tan c e s e x c u s in g h is la te f ilin g . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 2 0 8 .4 ( a ) ( 5 ) . A c c o r d in g ly , w e d is m is s in p art an dd e n yin p art a s to Carh u a z Ro d r i g u e z ’ s a s y l u m c l a i m.07- 74048 3 W i th res pectt o w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , the B IA deni ed re l i ef i n p art b e c au s e C arh u a z R o d r ig u e z f a ile dto e s tab lis h alik e lih o o do f h arm in th e f

u tu r e . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th is d e te rm in a tio n . See Mo l i n a - Es tra da v . I NS , 293 F .3 d1 0 8 9 , 1 0 9 5 -9 6 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 2 ). A cc o rd in g ly, C arh u az R o d rig u ez ’s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art.