alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 317/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 317 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6220 September 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 317

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6220 September 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 317/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 317/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2019/C 317/02 | Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections ( OJ C 303, 6.9.2019 ) | 4 |

Corrigenda

2019/C 317/02

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections ( OJ C 303, 6.9.2019 )

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |        |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 6, 2006 |  |        |  | /s/ David J. Wagner    
|                       |  | Name:  |  | David J. Wagner        
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021098EN.01002201.xml

| 22.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Amisi Kumba v Council

(Case T-118/19) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures - Right to private and family life - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality - Plea of illegality)

(2021/C 98/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gabriel Amisi Kumba (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, H. Marcos Fraile, S. Van Overmeire and M.-C. Cadilhac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1940 of 10 December 2018 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2018 L 134, p. 47) and, second, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1931 of 10 December 2018 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2018 L 314, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Gabriel Amisi Kumba to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Gabriel Amisi Kumba to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard McKinney, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford, 71*AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Dillon, J.—criminal trespass, third degree, and petit larceny.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
#### David ALBERTSON; Robert Albertson, Appellants, Posi-Grip Tool Company, Inc.; Zeal Industries, Inc.; Master Craft Tool Company, LLC, formerly known as Kaskaid Tool Company, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. The STANLEY WORKS, a Connecticut corporation; Mac Tools, an Ohio corporation; Petters Group Worldwide, LLC, Appellees.

No. 07-2972.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 29, 2008.

Filed: Jan. 8, 2009.

Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

David and Robert Albertson appeal the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to defendants following settlement of claims with plaintiff Master Craft Tool Company, formerly known as Kaskaid Tool Company, LLC. After carefully reviewing the record and considering appellants’ arguments, we find no basis for reversing *18the district court’s order. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DARRELL ROBERTS,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00089

- CR

Appeal from the

409th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20030D01740)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction . We

further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2014.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rive ra, and Rodriguez, JJ.
# Official Journal C 519/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 519 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6422 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 519

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6422 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 519/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10549 – ARDIAN FRANCE / RG SAFETY) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 519/02 | Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.9637 – IAG / AIR EUROPA) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 519/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10549 – ARDIAN FRANCE / RG SAFETY) (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 519/02

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.9637 – IAG / AIR EUROPA) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          46,099
<SECURITIES>                                   114,215
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                    93,552
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               281,063
<PP&E>                                          60,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 394,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          215,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            33
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   394,888
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,631
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  34
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,454
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,593
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,593
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 308 

Designating November 27, 2011, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2011 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself, Mr. PRYOR, and Mr. CHAMBLISS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 27, 2011, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the United States; 

Whereas every individual traveling on the roads and highways 

needs to drive in a safer manner to reduce deaths and 

injuries that result from motor vehicle accidents; 

Whereas according to the National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration, wearing a seat belt saves more than 

15,000 lives each year; 

Whereas the Senate wants all people of the United States to 

understand the life-saving importance of wearing a seat 

belt and encourages motorists to drive safely, not just 

during the holiday season, but every time they get behind 

the wheel; and 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 308 ATS 

Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is the busiest highway traffic day of the year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) encourages— 

3 (A) high schools, colleges, universities, ad4 ministrators, teachers, primary schools, and 

5 secondary schools to launch campus-wide edu6 cational campaigns to urge students to be fo7 cused on safety when driving; 

8 (B) national trucking firms to alert their 

9 drivers to be especially focused on driving safely 

10 on the Sunday after Thanksgiving, and to pub11 licize the importance of the day through use of 

12 Citizen’s Band (‘‘CB’’) radios and truck stops 

13 across the Nation; 

14 (C) clergy to remind their members to 

15 travel safely when attending services and gath16 erings; 

17 (D) law enforcement personnel to remind 

18 drivers and passengers to drive safely, particu19 larly on the Sunday after Thanksgiving; and 

20 (E) all people of the United States to use 

21 the Sunday after Thanksgiving as an oppor22 tunity to educate themselves about highway 

23 safety; and 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 308 ATS 

1 (2) designates November 27, 2011, as ‘‘Drive 

2 Safer Sunday’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Zawyer C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 758] —

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Zawyer C. appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Lubow, J.), dated April 8, 2011, as, upon a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered August 27, 2010, made upon her admission, finding that she had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted criminal mischief in the fourth degree, placed her in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, with credit for time spent in detention from February 14, 2011, to March 4, 2011.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The only issues raised by the appellant concern that portion of the order of disposition which placed her in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, with credit for time spent in detention from February 14, 2011, to March 4, 2011. Since the placement has expired, the appeal must be dismissed as academic *(see Matter of Gawen M.,*90 AD3d 1051, 1052 [2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 811 [2012]; *Matter of Eric R.,*78 AD3d 841 [2010]; *Matter of Delroy*A., 73 AD3d 912 [2010]). Contrary to the appellant’s contention, this matter does not warrant invoking the exception to the mootness doctrine *(see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). Angiolillo, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James P. Dougan, Appellant.

— Weiss, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered November 19, 1984, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree.

On April 6, 1984, defendant was charged in a one-count indictment with grand larceny in the second degree, relating to the theft of funds from Elmira College where he had been employed. After the denial of his motion to suppress oral and written confessions obtained from him by the Elmira City Police, defendant entered a plea of guilty to a lesser charge of grand larceny in the third degree in full satisfaction of the indictment.

On this appeal, the sole issue is whether the People estab*930lished a knowing and intelligent waiver of defendant’s *Miranda*rights *(see, Miranda v Arizona,*384 US 436). A review of the *Huntley*hearing transcript confirms that defendant voluntarily accompanied the police to the detective bureau on March 29, 1984, where he was apprised of his *Miranda*rights and actually signed a written waiver prior to making any statements. Since the People established the legality of the police conduct in the first instance, the burden of persuasion on the motion to suppress became defendant’s *(see, People v Di Stefano,*38 NY2d 640, 651, 652; *People v Love,*85 AD2d 799, *affd*57 NY2d 998).

To this end, defendant claims that he could not effectively have waived his constitutional rights since he was under the influence of several prescribed medications and had consumed at least four beers prior to the interview. He indicated that he was confused and signed the written confession solely to secure his immediate release. Defendant’s treating physician confirmed that medications had been prescribed on March 29, 1984 for a possible disc problem and further opined that the combination of drugs and alcohol "could” have affected defendant’s ability to comprehend his rights. In contrast, the officers testified that defendant was very cooperative, appeared normal, indicated he understood his rights and gave articulate, coherent responses to the inquiries made *(cf People v White,*85 AD2d 787). Neither detected the aroma of alcohol on defendant’s person. Significantly, it was upon defendant’s own urging that an addendum was made to his written statement indicating that he intended to make restitution for the funds taken. This prompting seems ironic given defendant’s testimony that his principal concern was to be released as soon as possible.

Considering the totality of these circumstances, we find ample support for the trial court’s determination that defendant’s statements were voluntary beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Gloskey,*105 AD2d 871, 872; *People v Love, supra; see also, 2*Ringel, Searches & Seizures, Waiver as Assertion, § 28.4 [a], at 28-18, 28-18.1 [2d ed]). The judgment should therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Harvey, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 13 (a)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of Lihir Gold Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for theyear ended December 31, 2006 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or aboutApril 16, 2007 (the “Report”), I , Arthur Hood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Exhibit 32.2



Visual Networks, Inc.



Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Visual Networks, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (c) | the Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ George J. Roberts                                                                
|                                                                                     
|George J. Roberts Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 30, 2004



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Visual Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Visual Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 4, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    DAVID J. WAGNER
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Name:                  |  | David J. Wagner        
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019295EN.01004302.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/43

---

Action brought on 28 June 2019 — Viola v Parliament

(Case T-417/19)

(2019/C 295/56)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Vincenzo Viola (Palermo, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;

| — | order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.

---
EX-10.8



 EXHIBIT 10.8 
 Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary Sheet 
  

					
	 Annual Retainer 
	  	$	39,655	  
		
	Type of Meeting	  	Amount Paid per Meeting	 
	 Board Meeting
	  	$	 3,965	  
	 Special Meeting
	  	$	 3,965	  
	 Telephonic Board Meeting
	  	$	 1,130	  
	 Compensation & Nominating Committee Meeting
	  	$	 1,700	  
	 Audit Committee Meeting
	  	$	 3,400	  
	 Executive Committee Meeting
	  	$	 3,965	  
	 Additional Fee for Chairperson (except Audit)
	  	$	 1,700	  
	 Additional Fee for Audit Committee Chairperson
	  	$	 2,265