alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen P. Kuchen, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PacificHealth
Laboratories, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

DATE: March 28, 2004                By: /s/ Stephen P. Kuchen
                                        ---------------------
                                    Stephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Binta Touray, Respondent, v Manuel F. Munoz et al., Appellants.

[946 NYS2d 860]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura Douglas, J.), entered on or about April 18, 2011, which granted plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ answer to the extent of striking defendant Jose Gonzalez’s answer unless he appeared for deposition within 45 days of the date of the order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff established that defendant Gonzalez’s repeated failure to appear for a deposition, and his failure to comply with successive disclosure orders, were willful and contumacious *(see Fish & Richardson, P.C. v Schindler,*75 AD3d 219, 220 [2010]). In opposition, defendants failed to meet their burden of demonstrating a reasonable excuse for Gonzalez’s nonappearance, offering no excuse for his failure to appear for a deposition from April 20, 2010 to January 19, 2011 *(see id.).*Defendants also failed to demonstrate good faith efforts to secure Gonzalez’s appearance at a deposition. The record does not reveal any *624concerted attempt by his attorneys to retain an investigator to locate him until after he failed to appear several times (see *Mason v MTA N.Y. City Tr.,*38 AD3d 258 [2007]; *Wong v Ki Il Kim,*17 AD3d 128 [2005]). Moreover, the investigation performed shows that Gonzalez received correspondence from his attorney’s office, and simply ignored it. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 447 Filed: 02/03/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:2483
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 447 Filed: 02/03/10 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:2484
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 447 Filed: 02/03/10 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:2485
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 447 Filed: 02/03/10 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:2486
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 447 Filed: 02/03/10 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:2487
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 447 Filed: 02/03/10 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:2488
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF CAREMARK RX, INC.

MedPartners Acquisition Corporation
Home Health Agency of Greater Miami, Inc.
MedPartners Administrative Services, Inc.
MedPartners Managed Care, Inc.
Acute Care Medical Management, Inc.
BGS Healthcare, Inc.
MedTennessee, Inc.
MedPartners Aviation, Inc.
MedPartners East, Inc.
MedPartners Professional Management Corporation
HealthWays, Inc.
Bay Area Practice Management Group, Inc.
MMC Med, Inc.
CHS Management, Inc.
Caremark International Inc.
Caremark Inc.
MP Receivables Company
Prescription Health Services Inc.
PSD Holding Corporation
Caremark Indemnity Ltd.
Caremark International Holdings Inc.
Caremark Holdings N.V.
MedPartners Physician Services, Inc.
Friendly Hills Healthcare Network, Inc.
MedPartners NSC Ltd.
Pacific Physician Services, Inc.
PPS East, Inc.
PPS North Carolina Medical Management, Inc.
PPS Riverside Division Acquisition and Management Corp. I
PPS Valley Management, Inc.
Pacific Physician Services Arizona, Inc.
Pacific Physician Services Nevada, Inc.
Physicians' Hospital Management Corporation
Reliant Healthcare Systems, Inc.
MedPartners Provider Network, Inc.
MedPartners/Talbert Medical Management Corporation
Talbert Medical Management Corporation
Talbert Health Services Corporation
Opinion issued May 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00566-CV

———————————

DANNA LETRICE HARRIS, Appellant

V.

ME ALPHA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1108977

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant’s brief was originally due on February 25, 2019. On March 13, 

2019, we issued a notice advising appellant that unless the brief was filed within ten 

days, we might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Appellant neither timely 
2

filed a brief nor requested an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (the appellate 

court may dismiss for want of prosecution for failure to file appellant’s brief). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Hightower.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street
Properties Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, George J. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


Dated:  August 13, 2003           /s/ George J. Carter
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  George J. Carter
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Franklin Street Properties Corp. and will be retained by Franklin
Street Properties Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street
Properties Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, George J. Carter, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

            (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.


Dated: November 12, 2003                 /s/ George J. Carter
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         George J. Carter
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Franklin Street Properties Corp. and will be retained by Franklin
Street Properties Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

COMPUTATION  OF  PER  SHARE  EARNINGS

<S>                                       <C>
Earnings (1)                                12497000
----------------------------------------  ----------

Shares Outstanding                         114370836
----------------------------------------  ----------

Shares Outstanding (Fully Diluted) (2)     125334953
                                          ----------

Basic Earnings per Share                  $     0.11
                                          ----------

Basic Earnings per Share (Fully Diluted)  $     0.11
----------------------------------------  ----------
--------------
<FN>
(1)     Based  on  Canadian  GAAP.
(2)     Consists  of  9,764,117 exercisable stock options at prices ranging from
Cdn  $0.28  to Cdn $12.15 per share; 600,000 options at $0.91 per share; 100,000
broker warrants at U.S. $7.50 per share and 500,000 broker warrants at $3.40 per
share.
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          68,066
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,586,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,678,331
<PP&E>                                      22,798,275
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,415,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,615,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,535,558
<BONDS>                                      3,746,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,671,366
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,988,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,615,860
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,132,227
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,796,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,358,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             669,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,430,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                   976,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,454,706
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,454,706
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,690
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,590
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,379
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,302
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,429
<LOANS>                                         86,481
<ALLOWANCE>                                        772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,058
<DEPOSITS>                                     114,011
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,357
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,157
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 129,058
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,804
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,629
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    99
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,532
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,629
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,634
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,898
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      285
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   4
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,789
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,789
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.54
<LOANS-NON>                                         80
<LOANS-PAST>                                       513
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   674
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      318
<RECOVERIES>                                       131
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  772
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               772
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            504
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Marshall W. Lane, Respondent, v Tompkins County Sheriff’s Department et al., Appellants, and Special Disability Fund, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

—Casey, J.

Appeals from two decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 9, 1984 and January 14, 1985.

At issue is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board erred in finding that the June 9, 1971 closing of claimant’s compensation case, pending the outcome of a third-party action, was not a true closing so as to extend the time for filing a claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund under Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (8). The employer argues that the Board erred in applying a rigid "true closing” requirement to. Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (8) and that, in any event, the finding that there had been no true closing is not supported by substantial evidence. We reject both arguments.

The employer’s first argument is predicated upon its claim that the standards for a "true closing” developed in cases under Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 25-a and 123 are inapplicable to cases which arise under section 15 (8). However, as we pointed out in *Matter of Hirschhorn v L & N Fruit & Produce*(43 AD2d 1007), "[t]he critical test in each instance is whether the case was, in fact, closed, a factual matter clearly within the province of the board to determine”. Since the closing pending the outcome of the third-party action in this case contemplated further proceedings, it cannot be said that the Board’s finding is irrational.

Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Special Disability Fund. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE: 

Friday, July 30, 2021, from 10:00-11:00 a.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda of the teleconference is: Committee Chair's Opening Remarks; Discussion of NSF's 2022-2026 Strategic Plan.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​notices.jsp#sunshine.*                         Please refer to the National Science                               ( print page 40219)                            Board website                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for general information.                    

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2021-16109 Filed 7-23-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 15, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-138

Lower Tribunal No. 21-7112

________________

Yavor Efremov,

Appellant,

vs.

Motorsport Network, LLC, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William 

Thomas, Judge.

Clarke Silverglate, P.A., and Craig Salner and Karen H. Curtis, for 

appellant.

AXS Law Group, PLLC, and Jeffrey W. Gutchess, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s determination that the contract terms 

at issue warranted the granting of the Appellee’s motion for summary 
2

judgment. Shivdasani v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 306 So. 3d 1156, 

1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (“Courts cannot disregard ... agreed-upon, 

contractual provisions between parties. To do so would be to strike the ... 

obligations from the contract by way of judicial fiat and the bargained-for 

contractual terms would be rendered surplusage.”).

In addition, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of 

Appellant’s motion to amend its complaint. In the last weeks before the 

summary judgment hearing, Appellant sought to add counts maintaining that 

the contract provisions he had relied upon in the litigation up to that point in 

time did not reflect the parties’ intent and must be reformed on account of 

mutual or unilateral mistake. The trial court properly found that the 

amendment would be both untimely and futile. Vella v. Salaues, 290 So. 3d 

946, 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). Accordingly, we affirm the well-reasoned 

judgment of the trial court.