alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Franklin Street Properties Corp. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  May 14, 2003
                              /s/ George J. Carter
                              ----------------------------------------------
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer


                              /s/ Barbara J. Corinha
                              ----------------------------------------------
                                  Vice President, Chief Operating
                                  Officer (equivalent of Chief Financial
                                  Officer), Treasurer and Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       28
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of CD&L, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-3321, No. 333-3323 and No. 333-47357 on Form S-8 of our report dated March
26, 2004 (April 14, 2004 as to Notes 8 and 14), relating to the consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows and
financial statement schedule of CD&L, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CD&L, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2005.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York
July 12, 2006
#### 504 Will-Tow Realty Corporation et al., Respondents, v Board of Managers of Williamsville Towers Condominium, Appellant.

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in memorandum decision at Special Term, Wolf, J. (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Annual Report of CD&L, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Albert W. Van Ness, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
           the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
           Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of
           operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: July 12, 2006

                                                    \s\ Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                    Albert W. Van Ness, Jr.
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section
     1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as
     part of Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure statement.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
     furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



/s/
JOSEPH R. TOMKINSON
Joseph R. Tomkinson
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2011

/s/
TODD R. TAYLOR
Todd R. Taylor
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2011

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John Mutch, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Peregrine Systems, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | Date:                                                         |  | April 5, 2005
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
| |  | /s/JOHN MUTCHJohn Mutch
President and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB REPORT OF OVM INTERNATIONAL HOLDING CORP. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0001030916
<NAME>                      OVM INTERNATIONAL HOLDING CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
<CURRENCY>                                   RENMINBI YUAN

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       8.28
<CASH>                                              14,444
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       29,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         34,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   137,689
<PP&E>                                              46,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                      10,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     194,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               82,717
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                10
<OTHER-SE>                                          60,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       194,077
<SALES>                                             20,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    20,603
<CGS>                                               11,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       11,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            72
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (776)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.06)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, John G. Demeritt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










Date:  April
      28, 2009
            /s/ John G.
      Demeritt
              John
      G. Demeritt
              Chief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Annual Report of CD&L, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Russell J. Reardon, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of operations of
         the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: July 12, 2006

                                                      \s\ Russell J. Reardon
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Russell J. Reardon
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of Form 10-K
or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

          - 8 CFR Chapter I
          - [CIS No. 2617-18; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2018-0001]
          - RIN 1615-AC19

# AGENCY:

Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

# ACTION:

Ratification.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Homeland Security is publishing notification of the Secretary of Homeland Security's ratification of a rule.

# DATES:

The ratification was signed on May 4, 2021 and relates back to the original date of each action that it ratifies.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Leo (Chip) Boucher, Assistant General Counsel, Administrative Law, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528, (202) 282-9822.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On May 4, 2021, the Secretary of Homeland Security ratified a final rule entitled, Removal of 30-Day Processing Provision for Asylum Applicant-Related Form I-765 Employment Authorization Applications, as well as the associated notice of proposed rulemaking. *See*85 FR 37502 (June 22, 2020); 84 FR 47148 (Sept. 9, 2019). The Department is now publishing the ratification in the **Federal Register** out of an abundance of caution. Neither the ratification nor the publication is a statement that the ratified action would be invalid absent the ratification, whether published or otherwise.

Signed:

Adam Hunter,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Immigration Policy, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

      ( print page 40919)    

[FR Doc. 2021-16329 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9112-FP-P
Exhibit 32

Certification Furnished Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the
Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Kerry J. ChauvinKerry J. ChauvinChief Executive OfficerJuly 27, 2007By:

/s/ Joseph P. Gallagher, IIIJoseph P. Gallagher, IIIChief Financial OfficerJuly 27, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gulf Island
Fabrication, Inc. and will be retained by Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marc Tucker, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 897] —

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 30, 2008 *(People v Tucker,*54 AD3d 1065 [2008]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 2, 2004.

*1147Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Dillon and Belen, JJ., concur.
that Coyer provided assistance in the prosecution of another case. The

sentencing agreement was drafted after Coyer entered his plea and did not have the effect of amending the guilty plea agreement; it was not signed by Coyer and it was not presented to the district court for approval. Moreover, the sentencing agreement's terms were fulfilled.' The parties informed the district court that Coyer provided substantial assistance, the district court considered Coyer's assistance as a mitigating factor, and the State argued for probation. Accordingly, we conclude that Coyer's contention is belied by the record and that he has failed to demonstrate plain error in this regard.

Coyer also contends that "[t]he district court abused its sentencing discretion by failing to consider the July Sentencing Agreement and the assistance [he] provided in the prosecution of another matter." We review a district court's sentencing decision for abuse of discretion. Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 348, 213 P.3d 476, 490 (2009). Coyer's 16- to 60-month prison sentence falls within the parameters of the relevant statute, see MRS 205.060(2), he has not demonstrated that the district court relied solely upon impalpable evidence, see Denson v. State, 112 Nev. 489, 492, 915 P.2d 284, 286 (1996), and the district court's decision to grant probation is discretionary, see NRS 176A.100(1)(c). Moreover, as

1 The sentencing agreement provided, "If I provide the substantial assistance by testifying truthfully at all criminal proceedings including but not limited to the preliminary hearing and trial, then the State will inform the Court that I have provided substantial assistance and recommend probation for the charge of burglary."

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A zeCherry

discussed above, the record indicates that the district court considered the assistance that Coyer provided as a mitigating factor. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its sentencing discretion.

Having determined that Coyer is not entitled to relief, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

# j i-A--Q-Ldart t Hardesty

tELfii tAr-S Douglas

cc: Hon. Gary Fairman, District Judge State Public Defender/Ely State Public Defender/Carson City Attorney General/Carson City White Pine County District Attorney White Pine County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 3
(0) 1947A
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Gregory J. Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/  Gregory J. Dawson   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   | March 31,  2010     |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by KentuckyBancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### Emma Schmidt *vs.*Morris Durnham.

May 25, 1891.

Breach, of Promise of Marriage — Evidence.—Evidence *held*sufficient to j ustify the verdict in an action for breach of promise of marriage.

Same — Aggravation of Damages — Seduction — Evidence. — Seduction under promise of marriage-being alleged in aggravation of damages, evidence of the sickness of the plaintiff immediately after the acts complained of was admissible.

Same — Mitigation of Damages — Shooting of Defendant by Plaintiff. Proof that subsequently the plaintiff shot the defendant was not admissible in mitigation of damages.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county. *Smith,*J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $2,750 for plaintiff.

*E. A. Campbell,*for appellant.

*James A. Kellogg,*for respondent.

Dickinson, J.

This action is for the recovery of damages for a breach of promise of marriage. The allegations of the complaint were fully supported by the proof, and the verdict of the jury was justified.

*228There was no error in the rulings or charge of the court. The evidence of the physical condition — the sickness — of the plaintiff directly after the intercourse with the defendant, of which direct evidence had been given, was admissible, both for the purpose of corroborating the direct testimony of the plaintiff, and as bearing upon the matter of damages.

The proof offered by the defendant “in mitigation of damages,” that some two weeks after the plaintiff had been informed of his marriage to another person, she sought him out and shot him, was properly excluded. That could neither be allowed in mitigation of her damages, nor would it tend 'to support the defendant’s denial of the cause of action alleged.

The exception to the charge of the court was not justified. That part of the charge excepted to, relating to the issue of a promise of marriage, was that “many things may be implied or are implied where contracts of this kind are made or exist.” We see no fault in this language, and the whole charge upon the subject, of which this is a part, was correct.

Order affirmed.