alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 1 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 2 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 3 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 4 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 5 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 6 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 7 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 8 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 9 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 10 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 11 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 12 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 13 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 14 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 15 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 16 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 17 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 18 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 19 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 20 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 21 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 22 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 23 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 24 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 25 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 26 of 27
Case 1:01-cv-08541 Document 1 Filed 11/06/01 Page 27 of 27
#### MONTROSE, Respondent, v. POTTERTON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Frederick Montrose, an infant, by George Montrose, his guardian ad litem, against John.H. Potterton and another, copartners, etc., impleaded with others.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |       
|Date: August 9, 2006 |  |        |  | /s/ David J. Wagner    
|                     |  | Name:  |  | David J. Wagner        
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
No. 12422 

### IN THE SUPKEME COUKT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1973

JUMPING IIALNBO3 

### IUNCH, A Montana corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent,

RLCHARD J. 

### CONKLIN and MRS. RICHARD J

# .CONKLIN

## , hiswife et al, Defendants and Appellants.
Appeal from: District Court of the SixthJudicialDistrict, Honorable JackD. Shanstrom, Judge presiding. Counsel of Record: For Appellants: Richard 

### J. Conklin argued, White Sulphur Springs,

Montana. For Respondent: Landoe and Gary, Bozeman, Montana. Ronald K. Olson argued, Bozeman, Montana. Arnold Huppert, 

### Jr., Livingston, Montana.

Submitted: March 28, 1973 Decided:

### MAY

# -21973 File,: 

## MRY-21973Honorable Edward T. Dussault,district judge, sitting in place of Mr. Chief Justice James T. Harrison. This is an appeal from an order in a quiet title action extending a temporary restraining order or injunction, restraining the county assessor of Park County from assessing certain lands located in said county and being claimed by appellants Conklin and Orser. The district court extended the injunction order for 90 days on October 2, 1972. This appealmust be dismissed for two reasons: The question of the extension of the restraining order
or injunction became moot prior to the date of the hearing on this appeal. From the order itself it appears that the extension expired on January 3, 1973. Secondly, the notice of appeal filed October 30, 1972 reveals only an appeal on behalf of defendants Conklin and Orser and not the Park County assessor,Homer K. Langley, the real party in interest. No showingwas made that the Park County attorney represented the county assessor at any stage of the proceedings thus far in district court or that the county assessor has ever authorized appellant'sattorney to representhim in any part of the proceeding in district court on this appeal. InWilson 

### v. State Highway Comm'n, 140Mont. 253, 257, 370 P.2d 486, this Court said: 

### " 

## * 

## * * This court has power, sua sponte, to dismiss any appealwhich does not present an actual justiciable controversy. Gill v. Liquor Control Board, 133 Mont. 505, 326 P.2d 974." Olsen v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co. 150Mont. 147, 432 P.2d 381. The appeal is dismissed and thematter is remanded to the district court for trial on themerits.Hon. Edward T. Dussault, district judge, sitting in place of Mr. Chief Justice James T. Harrison.

We concur:

/ Associate Justices 

# /
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert H. Gilliam, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I 

have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 13, 2003 

 

/s/ Robert H. Gilliam, Jr.

Robert H. Gilliam, Jr.,

President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 12.2**
I, Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Companhia Vale Do Rio Doce; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 2, 2005                                 /s/ Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa   Name:  Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa   Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.9
 
  
  Company Executive Agreement
 1.
 Annual Incentive Bonus
 2.




---



##### 



3.
 Stock Options
 4.
  (i)
    
    the equivalent of twenty-four (24) months of Executives annual
Base Salary as in effect immediately prior to the Termination Date, payable on
the same basis and at the same time as previously paid, commencing on the first
regularly scheduled pay date following the effective date of the release
mentioned in Section 10(g);(ii)
    
    a lump sum amount equal to two times Executives Bonus
Potential;(iii)
    
    annual bonus for the year during which termination occurs,
pro-rated for time and performance as judged by the Chairman of the
Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors; and(iv)
    
    (A) if Executive elects to continue for himself and his
eligible dependents health insurance coverage following the Termination Date,
pay the employers share of such coverage, at the same level of coverage that
was in effect as of the Termination Date, for a period of 24 consecutive months
after the Termination Date or until Executive has become eligible for health
coverage through another employer, which ever occurs first; or (B) if as of the
Termination Date, Executive has, pursuant to the last sentence of Section 4(e)
above, waived coverage for himself and his dependents under the Companys group
health plan, pay to Executive the employers share of the premiums for the
coverage that he waived for 24 consecutive months after the Termination Date or
until Executive has become eligible for health coverage through another
employer, which ever occurs first.
     Page 2 of 3




---



##### 



StarTek, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Albert YatesAlbert Yates, ChairmanCompensation CommitteeBoard of Directors
  A. Laurence JonesA. Laurence JonesDate: 5/23/08
  Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001031002
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING II, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                   363,950
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               371,155
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,204
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    309,278
<COMMON>                                        54,673
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   371,155
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,768
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,768
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,768
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 63 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 63

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Secretary of the Senate is requested to return to the House of 
Representatives the enrolled bill (S. 2367, an Act to strike the word 
``lunatic'' from Federal law, and for other purposes). Upon the return 
of such bill, the action of the Speaker of the House of Representatives 
in signing it shall be rescinded. The Secretary of the Senate shall 
reenroll the bill with the following correction: In section 2(b)(1)(B), 
strike ``in subsection (b)'' and insert ``in subsection (j)''.

            Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 
      17), 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 63

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

                 Correcting the enrollment of S. 2367.
```
#### TANNER, Appellant, v. ECKHARDT et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by F. J. Tanner, as receiver, etc., against John Eckhardt and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        George W. Luxbacher, Designated Federal Officer, MSHRAC, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2400 Century Parkway NE, Atlanta, GA 30345; Telephone: (404) 498-2808; email:                         *gluxbacher@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2021-15800 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ken Sexton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that except for
the failure to timely file the report, the Quarterly Report of Peregrine Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Systems, Inc.

Date:
September 9, 2004

| |  | /s/KEN SEXTONKen Sexton
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Peregrine Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF THE 

PETITION OF PETER & 

PATRICIA KOSTYSHYN FOR 

EXTRAORDINARY WRITS

IN THE MATTER OF THE 

PETITION OF PETER & 

PATRICIA KOSTYSHYN FOR 

EXTRAORDINARY WRITS

§

§ No. 406, 2023

§ 

§

§ 

§

§ No. 407, 2023

§

§ 

§

ORDER

This 7

th day of December 2023, it appears to the Court that on November 21, 

2023, the Court entered an order directing the petitioners to pay the required filing 

fee by December 6, 2023, or these matters would be dismissed without further 

notice. The petitioners have not paid the filing fee as ordered; therefore, dismissal 

of these proceedings is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 301 

Urging the people of the United States to observe October 2011 as Italian 

and Italian-American Heritage Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 20, 2011 

Mr. CASEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Urging the people of the United States to observe October 

2011 as Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month. 

Whereas Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month is an 

appropriate time to recognize the enormous contributions 

that Italian and Italian-American people have made to 

the United States and the world throughout history, including generals, admirals, philosophers, statesmen, musicians, athletes, and Nobel Prize-winning scientists; 

Whereas Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month salutes the Italian and Italian-American community and expresses appreciation for the culture and heritage of 

Italians and Italian Americans that has immeasurably 

enriched the lives of the people of the United States and 

the world; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 301 IS 

Whereas the strength and success of the United States, the 

vitality of communities, and the effectiveness of society 

depend, in great measure, upon the distinctive and sterling qualities demonstrated by various ethnic groups and 

exemplified by members of the Italian and Italian-American community, who share their rich and unique heritage with all people of the United States; and 

Whereas it is fitting and proper that October 2011 be observed as Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month 

throughout the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the enormous contributions that 

3 Italian and Italian-American people have made to 

4 the United States and the world throughout history; 

5 and 

6 (2) urges the people of the United States— 

7 (A) to acknowledge October 2011 as 

8 Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month; 

9 and 

10 (B) to observe the month with appropriate 

11 events and activities. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS