alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15880]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: July 28, 2021; 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by video-conference only.

STATUS: Part of this meeting will be open to the public and will be 
streamed live, accessible from www.fmc.gov. The rest of the meeting 
will be closed to the public.

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: 
1. Commissioner Bentzel, Update on Equipment Manufacturing and 
Availability Research
2. Commissioner Dye, Interim Recommendations International Ocean 
Transportation Supply Chain Engagement, Fact Finding 29
3. Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: 
1. Investigation into Conditions Created by Canadian Ballast Water 
Regulations in the U.S./Canada Great Lakes Trade

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Rachel Dickon, Secretary, (202) 
523-5725.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Rachel Dickon,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15880 Filed 7-23-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PETER ROSELLE, *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

June 28, 1960.

*Messrs. Budd, Lamer & Kent*for the petitioners.

*Mr. David D. Furman*and *Mr. William L. Boyan*for the respondent.

Granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT 8

LIST OF PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES

-     Niugini Mining Limited, incorporated under the laws of Papua New Guinea,
      became a 100% owned subsidiary of Lihir on February 2, 2000.

-     Niugini Mining (Australia) Pty Limited, incorporated under the laws of
      Australia, is a 100% owned subsidiary of Niugini Mining Limited.

-     Lihir Management Company Limited, incorporated under the laws of Papua New
      Guinea, became a 100% owned subsidiary of Lihir on 10 October 2006.

-     Lihir Business Development Limited, incorporated under the laws of Papua
      New Guinea, is a 100% owned subsidiary of Lihir Management Company
      Limited.

-     Lihir Services Australia Pty Limited, incorporated under the laws of
      Australia, became a 100% owned subsidiary of Lihir on 7 November 2005.
#### Barclays American/Financial, Inc., Respondent, v Thomas H. Knapp et al., Appellants.

— Order unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff concedes on appeal that Special Term should have dismissed the complaint as against defendant Thomas H. Knapp. An order must be entered to that effect. We have reviewed all of the other issues raised by defendants on this appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Contiguglia, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 345 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the closure of Umatilla Army Chemical 

Depot, Oregon. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2011 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. MERKLEY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the closure of Umatilla 

Army Chemical Depot, Oregon. 

Whereas, in December 2001, the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2002 (Public Law 107–107) 

was signed into law, which included authorization for a 

2005 round of defense base closure and realignment 

(BRAC); 

Whereas, on February 16, 2004, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld included the closure of the Umatilla Army 

Chemical Depot, Oregon, as one of his recommendations 

for the 2005 round of defense base closure and realignment; 

Whereas, on September 8, 2005, the Defense Base Closure 

and Realignment Commission, in its report making recommendations to the President, found that Secretary of 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 345 ATS 

Defense Rumsfeld’s assertion that the chemical demilitarization mission at Umatilla would be complete by the 

2nd quarter of 2011 was optimistic, and wrote, ‘‘An examination of status information for the depot’s mission 

completion and subsequent closure revealed that dates 

may slip beyond the 6-year statutory period for completion of BRAC actions.’’; 

Whereas, in that same report, the Defense Base Closure and 

Realignment Commission took the Secretary of Defense’s 

recommendation ‘‘Close Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR’’ 

and changed it to ‘‘On completion of the chemical demilitarization mission in accordance with treaty obligations, 

close Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR’’; 

Whereas, by doing so, the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission acknowledged that the closure of 

Umatilla Army Chemical Depot would happen when the 

demilitarization mission is completed, even if that is after 

September 15, 2011; and 

Whereas Congress did not pass a joint resolution of disapproval with respect to the Commission’s report, and 

the report and recommendations became law: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That, in light of the clear history, the Sen2 ate reiterates its original intent and reaffirms its direction 

3 that the closure of the Umatilla Army Chemical Depot, 

4 Oregon, and subsequent management and disposal shall 

5 be carried out in accordance with procedures and authori6 ties contained in the Defense Base Closure and RealignVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:42 Dec 07, 2011 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR345.ATS SR345

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 345 ATS 

1 ment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 

2 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1





Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of AHL
Services, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:    August 14, 2002





Name:

/s/    A. CLAYTON PERFALLTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 27 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the service of Sergeant First Class Leroy Arthur 

Petry, a native of Santa Fe, New Mexico, and the second 

living recipient of the Medal of Honor since the Vietnam 

War. 

Whereas Sergeant First Class Leroy Arthur Petry of the 

United States Army, a native of Santa Fe, New Mexico, 

was awarded the Medal of Honor by President Obama on 

July 12, 2011; 

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the highest honor awarded 

to members of the Armed Forces for valor in combat; 

Whereas the official citation awarding the Medal of Honor to 

Sergeant First Class Petry states that then-Staff Sergeant Petry ‘‘distinguished himself by acts of gallantry 

and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond 

the call of duty in action with an armed enemy in the vicinity of Paktya Province, Afghanistan, on May 26, 

2008’’; 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SCON 27 RFH 

Whereas Sergeant First Class Petry joins an elite group of 

Medal of Honor recipients dating back to the Civil War; 

Whereas Sergeant First Class Petry has continued a long 

tradition of military service to the United States by New 

Mexicans, dating back to the defense of the Western 

United States during the Civil War, and followed by participation in every major war fought by the United 

States; 

Whereas Sergeant First Class Petry is the second living recipient of the Medal of Honor since the Vietnam War; 

Whereas Sergeant First Class Petry fought with bravery and, 

despite wounds to both of his legs, had the courage and 

quick thinking needed to save the lives of his fellow soldiers by throwing back an enemy grenade and losing his 

right hand when the grenade detonated shortly after he 

released it; 

Whereas the actions of Sergeant First Class Petry represent 

the highest values of the Army, the Rangers, and the 

United States; 

Whereas Sergeant First Class Petry has consistently demonstrated humility and dedication to his fellow soldiers; 

Whereas Sergeant First Class Petry, who overcame a troubled youth and found the strength to turn his life around 

and dedicate himself to serving the United States, is an 

example to all people who are struggling in the United 

States; and 

Whereas the brave actions of Sergeant First Class Petry, as 

well as his modesty and selfless service, stand as the embodiment of the best attributes of the people of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SCON 27 RFH 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) honors the service and sacrifice of Sergeant 

4 First Class Leroy Arthur Petry of the United States 

5 Army and his family; and 

6 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to recognize the valor, heroism, and dedication to 

8 the United States exhibited by Sergeant First Class 

9 Petry. 

Passed the Senate September 23, 2011. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,585
<SECURITIES>                                    74,267
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (769)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,239
<PP&E>                                           8,125
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,184
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           425
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,931
<SALES>                                         16,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,825
<CGS>                                            3,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    54
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    334
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       334
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10758

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTHONY BONNER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:08-CR-332-8

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Bonner has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Bonner has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-10758 Document: 00511149867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 13 (B)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Form
20-F/A, of Lihir Gold Limited (the "Company") for the annual period ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

     3.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Companies.


/s/ Phil Baker
-------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: December 26, 2007

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the report or as a separate
disclosure document.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-20-00222-CV

IN RE AMERICAN ACCESS CASUALTY COMPANY

Original Proceeding

______________

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Cause No. 13510CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before the Court are Relator American Access Casualty Company’s Petition for 

Writ of Mandamus, Relator’s Motion for Temporary Relief, and Relator’s Motion to 

Voluntarily Dismiss Petition for Writ of Mandamus. We grant the motion to dismiss, 

deny Relator’s motion for temporary relief as moot, and dismiss this original proceeding. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).
In re American Access Casualty Company Page 2

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Neill, and

Justice Johnson

Dismissed; motions granted and denied

Opinion delivered and filed May 5, 2021

[OT06]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando VASQUEZ-MURILLO, a/k/a Fernando Vasquez-Moreo, a/k/a Fernando Vasquez, a/k/a Hosea Cervantes, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-4174.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 13, 2009.

Diana Hagen, Office of the United States Attorney, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Carlos A. Garcia, Scott Keith Wilson, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KELLY, LUCERO, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the appeal *209waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement. The motion is filed pursuant to *United States v. Hahn,*359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir.2004) (en banc). In response, defendant concedes that the government’s motion is well taken because the appeal falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice. *See id.*at 1325.

Accordingly, the government’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

*

 This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not *209binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth J. Saunders, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
except for the failure to timely file the report, the Quarterly Report of Peregrine Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Systems, Inc.

Date:
November 4, 2004

| |  | /s/KENNETH J. SAUNDERSKenneth J. Saunders
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Peregrine Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      33,841,099              53,815,461
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  455,766                 906,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,841,453              55,278,687
<PP&E>                                      24,421,106              10,767,551
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,502,270               2,152,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,286,170              64,299,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,292,008               6,320,339
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       134,304                 128,452
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,425,794              53,728,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,286,170              64,299,581
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,671,943               1,989,572
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,972,070               3,814,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,209,067               1,378,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,206,927)             (3,167,513)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,206,927)             (3,167,513)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,206,927)             (3,675,948)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)                  (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)                  (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 9 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 9

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the reappointment of Robert P. Kogod as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Robert P. Kogod of the District of Columbia, is filled by 
reappointment of the incumbent for a term of 6 years, effective May 6, 
2011.

            Passed the Senate March 15, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. J. RES. 9

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Robert P. Kogod as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```