Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0380; FRL-8694-01-R3]
 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 ACTION: Proposed rule.
 SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve multiple state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These revisions were submitted by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) to establish and require reasonably available control technology (RACT) for twenty-four major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and/or nitrogen oxides (NOX) pursuant to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's conditionally approved RACT regulations. In this rulemaking action, EPA is proposing to approve source-specific (also referred to as “case-by-case”) RACT determinations for sources at twenty-four major NOX
                         and VOC emitting facilities submitted by PADEP. These RACT evaluations were submitted to meet RACT requirements for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
 DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 1, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0380 at 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov,*
                         or via email to 
                        *opila.marycate@epa.gov.*
                         For comments submitted at 
                        *Regulations.gov,*
                         follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
                        *Regulations.gov.*
                         For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (
                        *i.e.,*
                         on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the 
                        **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
                         section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit 
                        *https://www.epa.gov/​dockets/​commenting-epa-dockets.*
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Riley Burger, Permits Branch (3AD10), Air & Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is (215) 814-2217. 
                        ( print page 41427)
                        Mr. Burger can also be reached via electronic mail at 
                        *burger.riley@epa.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 7, 2020, PADEP submitted a revision to its SIP to address case-by-case NOX
                     and/or VOC RACT for sources at numerous major NOX
                     and VOC emitting facilities located in the Commonwealth, including the twenty-four facilities in this action. This SIP revision is intended to address the NOX
                     and/or VOC RACT requirements under sections 182 and 184 of the CAA for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Table 1 of this document lists the SIP submittal date and the facilities included in PADEP's submittal. Although submitted in one SIP revision by PADEP, EPA views each facility as a separable SIP revision and may take separate final action on one or more facilities. For additional background information on Pennsylvania's “presumptive” RACT II SIP see 84 FR 20274 (May 9, 2019) and on Pennsylvania's source-specific or “case-by-case” RACT determinations see the appropriate technical support document (TSD) which is available online at 
                    *https://www.regulations.gov,*
                     Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0380. Table 1—PADEP SIP Submittals for Major NO
                        X
                         and/or VOC Sources in Pennsylvania Subject to Source-Specific RACT Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard
SIP submittal date
Major source
                             (county)5/7/2020
Anvil International, LLC (formerly Grinnell Corporation) (Lancaster).ArcelorMittal Plate LLC Conshohocken Plant (formerly Bethlehem Lukens Plate) (Montgomery).Braskem America Inc. Marcus Hook (formerly Epsilon Products Co.—Marcus Hook) (Delaware).Buck Co Inc. Quarryville (formerly Buck Company Inc) (Lancaster).Calumet Karns City Refining LLC (formerly Penreco—Karns City) (Butler).Clarion Bathware Marble (Clarion).Domtar Paper Company Johnsonburg Mill (formerly Willamette Industries, Johnsonburgh Mill) (Elk).Exelon Generation Company LLC Croydon Generating Station (formerly PECO Energy Co.—Croydon Generating Station) (Bucks).Georgia-Pacific Panel Products LLC Mt. Jewell MDF Plant (McKean).GE Transportation Grove City Engine (formerly GE Transportation Systems) (Mercer).GrafTech USA LLC St Marys (formerly The Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc) (Elk).Haysite Reinforced Plastics LLC Erie (Erie).INMETCO Ellwood City (formerly The International Metals Reclamation Co) (Lawrence).International Waxes Inc Farmers Valley (formerly Petrowax Refining) (McKean).Jeld Wen Fiber Division PA (Bradford).Mars Wrigley Confectionery US LLC Elizabethtown (Lancaster).Molded Fiber Glass Company Union City (formerly Molded Fiber Glass) (Erie).Monroe Energy LLC Trainer (formerly Conoco Phillips Company) (Delaware).Nova Chemicals Company Beaver (formerly Nova Chemicals, Inc.) (Beaver).Sasol Chemicals USA LLC (formerly Merisol Antioxidants LLC) (Venango).Silberline Manufacturing Company Lincoln Drive Plant (formerly Silberline Manufacturing Co) (Schuylkill).Superior Tube Company Lower Providence (formerly Superior Tube Company) (Montgomery).Victaulic Company Alburtis Facility (Lehigh).Victaulic Forks Facility (Northampton).
 I. Background A. 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Ground level ozone is not emitted directly into the air but is created by chemical reactions between NOX
                     and VOC in the presence of sunlight. Emissions from industrial facilities, electric utilities, motor vehicle exhaust, gasoline vapors, and chemical solvents are some of the major sources of NOX
                     and VOC. Breathing ozone can trigger a variety of health problems, particularly for children, the elderly, and people of all ages who have lung diseases such as asthma. Ground level ozone can also have harmful effects on sensitive vegetation and ecosystems. On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a standard for ground level ozone based on 8-hour average concentrations. 62 FR 38856. The 8-hour averaging period replaced the previous 1-hour averaging period, and the level of the NAAQS was changed from 0.12 parts per million (ppm) to 0.08 ppm. EPA has designated two moderate nonattainment areas in Pennsylvania under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, namely Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE (the Philadelphia Area) and Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley (the Pittsburgh Area). See 40 CFR 81.339. On March 12, 2008, EPA strengthened the 8-hour ozone standards, by revising its level to 0.075 ppm averaged over an 8-hour period (2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS). On May 21, 2012, EPA designated five marginal nonattainment areas in Pennsylvania for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Lancaster, Reading, the Philadelphia Area, and the Pittsburgh Area. 77 FR 30088; see also 40 CFR 81.339. On March 6, 2015, EPA announced its revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for all purposes and for all areas in the country, effective on April 6, 2015. 80 FR 12264. EPA has determined that certain nonattainment planning requirements continue to be in effect under the revoked standard for nonattainment areas under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, including RACT. B. RACT Requirements for Ozone The CAA regulates emissions of NOX
                     and VOC to prevent photochemical reactions that result in ozone formation. RACT is an important strategy for reducing NOX
                     and VOC emissions from major stationary sources within areas not meeting the ozone NAAQS. Areas designated nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS are subject to the general nonattainment planning requirements of CAA section 172. Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides that SIPs for nonattainment areas must include reasonably available control measures (RACM) for demonstrating attainment of all NAAQS, including emissions reductions from existing sources through the adoption of RACT. Further, section 182(b)(2) of the CAA sets forth additional RACT requirements 
                    ( print page 41428)
                    for ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or higher. Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA sets forth requirements regarding RACT for the ozone NAAQS for VOC sources. Section 182(f) subjects major stationary sources of NOX
                     to the same RACT requirements applicable to major stationary sources of VOC.[1] Section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA applies the RACT requirements in section 182(b)(2) to nonattainment areas classified as marginal and to attainment areas located within ozone transport regions established pursuant to section 184 of the CAA. Section 184(a) of the CAA established by law the current Ozone Transport Region (OTR) comprised of 12 eastern states, including Pennsylvania. This requirement is referred to as OTR RACT. As noted previously, a “major source” is defined based on the source's potential to emit (PTE) of NOX, VOC, or both pollutants, and the applicable thresholds differ based on the classification of the nonattainment area in which the source is located. See sections 182(c)-(f) and 302 of the CAA. Since the 1970's, EPA has consistently defined “RACT” as the lowest emission limit that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of the control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility.[2] EPA has provided more substantive RACT requirements through implementation rules for each ozone NAAQS as well as through guidance. In 2004 and 2005, EPA promulgated an implementation rule for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in two phases (“Phase 1 of the 1997 Ozone Implementation Rule” and “Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone Implementation Rule”). 69 FR 23951 (April 30, 2004) and 70 FR 71612 (November 29, 2005), respectively. Particularly, the Phase 2 Ozone Implementation Rule addressed RACT statutory requirements under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 70 FR 71652 (November 29, 2005). On March 6, 2015, EPA issued its final rule for implementing the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (“the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule”). 80 FR 12264. At the same time, EPA revoked the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, effective on April 6, 2015.[3]
                    
                     The 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule provided comprehensive requirements to transition from the revoked 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS to the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, as codified in 40 CFR part 51, subpart AA, following revocation. Consistent with previous policy, EPA determined that areas designated nonattainment for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the time of revocation, must retain implementation of certain nonattainment area requirements (
                    *i.e.,*
                     anti-backsliding requirements) for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS as specified under section 182 of the CAA, including RACT. See 40 CFR 51.1100(o). An area remains subject to the anti-backsliding requirements for a revoked NAAQS until EPA approves a redesignation to attainment for the area for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. There are no effects on applicable requirements for areas within the OTR, as a result of the revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Thus, Pennsylvania, as a state within the OTR, remains subject to RACT requirements for both the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. In addressing RACT, the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule is consistent with existing policy and Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone Implementation Rule. In the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA requires RACT measures to be implemented by January 1, 2017 for areas classified as moderate nonattainment or above and all areas of the OTR. EPA also provided in the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule that RACT SIPs must contain adopted RACT regulations, certifications where appropriate that existing provisions are RACT, and/or negative declarations stating that there are no sources in the nonattainment area covered by a specific control technique guidelines (CTG) source category. In the preamble to the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA clarified that states must provide notice and opportunity for public comment on their RACT SIP submissions, even when submitting a certification that the existing provisions remain RACT or a negative declaration. States must submit appropriate supporting information for their RACT submissions, in accordance with the Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone Implementation Rule. Adequate documentation must support that states have considered control technology that is economically and technologically feasible in determining RACT, based on information that is current as of the time of development of the RACT SIP. In addition, in the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA clarified that states can use weighted average NOX
                     emissions rates from sources in the nonattainment area for meeting the major NOX
                     RACT requirement under the CAA, as consistent with existing policy.[4]
                    
                     EPA also recognized that states may conclude in some cases that sources already addressed by RACT determinations for the 1979 1-hour and/or 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS may not need to implement additional controls to meet the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS RACT requirement. See 80 FR 12278 and 12279 (March 6, 2015). C. Applicability of RACT Requirements in Pennsylvania As indicated earlier, RACT requirements apply to any ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or higher (serious, severe or extreme) under CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f). Pennsylvania has outstanding ozone RACT requirements for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is part of the OTR established under section 184 of the CAA and thus is subject statewide to the RACT requirements of CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f), pursuant to section 184(b). At the time of revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (effective April 6, 2015), only two moderate nonattainment areas remained in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for this standard, the Philadelphia and the Pittsburgh Areas. As required under EPA's anti-backsliding provisions, these 
                    ( print page 41429)
                    two moderate nonattainment areas continue to be subject to RACT under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Given its location in the OTR, the remainder of the Commonwealth is also treated as moderate nonattainment area under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for any planning requirements under the revoked standard, including RACT. The OTR RACT requirement is also in effect under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS throughout the Commonwealth, since EPA did not designate any nonattainment areas above marginal for this standard in Pennsylvania. Thus, in practice, the same RACT requirements continue to be applicable in Pennsylvania for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. RACT must be evaluated and satisfied as separate requirements under each applicable standard. RACT applies to major sources of NOX
                     and VOC under each ozone NAAQS or any VOC sources subject to CTG RACT. Which NOX
                     and VOC sources in Pennsylvania are considered “major” and are therefore subject to RACT is dependent on the location of each source within the Commonwealth. Sources located in nonattainment areas would be subject to the “major source” definitions established under the CAA based on the area's current classification(s). In the case of Pennsylvania, sources located outside of moderate or above ozone nonattainment areas, as part of the OTR, shall be treated as if these areas were moderate. In Pennsylvania, the SIP program is implemented primarily by the PADEP, but also by local air agencies in Philadelphia County (the City of Philadelphia's Air Management Services [AMS]) and Allegheny County, (the Allegheny County Health Department [ACHD]). These agencies have implemented numerous RACT regulations and source-specific measures in Pennsylvania to meet the applicable ozone RACT requirements. Historically, statewide RACT controls have been promulgated by PADEP in Pennsylvania Code Title 25—Environmental Resources, Part I—Department of Environmental Protection, Subpart C—Protection of Natural Resources, Article III—Air Resources, (25 Pa. Code) Chapter 129. AMS and ACHD have incorporated by reference Pennsylvania regulations, but have also promulgated regulations adopting RACT controls for their own jurisdictions. In addition, AMS and ACHD have submitted, through PADEP, separate source-specific RACT determinations as SIP revisions for sources within their respective jurisdictions, which have been approved by EPA. See 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(1). States were required to make RACT SIP submissions for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS by September 15, 2006. PADEP submitted a SIP revision on September 25, 2006, certifying that a number of previously approved VOC RACT rules continued to satisfy RACT under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the remainder of Pennsylvania.[5]
                    
                     PADEP has met its obligations under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for its CTG and non-CTG VOC sources. See 82 FR 31464 (July 7, 2017). RACT control measures addressing all applicable CAA RACT requirements under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS have been implemented and fully approved in the jurisdictions of ACHD and AMS. See 78 FR 34584 (June 10, 2013) and 81 FR 69687 (October 7, 2016). For the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, states were required to submit RACT SIP revisions by July 20, 2014. On May 16, 2016, PADEP submitted a SIP revision addressing RACT for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in Pennsylvania. Specifically, the May 16, 2016 SIP submittal intended to satisfy sections 182(b)(2)(C), 182(f), and 184 of the CAA for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for Pennsylvania's major NOX
                     and VOC non-CTG sources, except ethylene production plants, surface active agents manufacturing, and mobile equipment repair and refinishing.[6] D. EPA's Conditional Approval for Pennsylvania's RACT Requirements Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS On May 16, 2016, PADEP submitted a SIP revision addressing RACT for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in Pennsylvania. PADEP's May 16, 2016 SIP revision intended to address certain outstanding VOC CTG RACT and major NOX
                     RACT requirements under the CAA for both standards. The SIP revision requested approval of Pennsylvania's 25 Pa. Code 129.96-100, 
                    *Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO**X**and VOCs*
                     (the “presumptive” RACT II rule). Prior to the adoption of the RACT II rule, Pennsylvania relied on the NOX
                     and VOC control measures in 25 Pa. Code 129.92-95, 
                    *Stationary Sources of NO**X**and VOCs,*
                     (the RACT I rule) to meet RACT for major sources of VOC and NOX
                    . The requirements of the RACT I rule remain in effect and continue to be implemented as RACT.[7]
                    
                     On September 26, 2017, PADEP submitted a supplemental SIP revision which committed to address various deficiencies identified by EPA in PADEP's May 16, 2016 “presumptive” RACT II rule SIP revision. On May 9, 2019, EPA conditionally approved the RACT II rule based on PADEP's September 26, 2017 commitment letter.[8]
                    
                     See 84 FR 20274. In EPA's final conditional approval, EPA noted that PADEP would be required to submit, for EPA's approval, SIP revisions to address any facility-wide or system-wide averaging plan approved under 25 Pa. Code 129.98 and any case-by-case RACT determinations under 25 Pa. Code 129.99. PADEP committed to submitting these additional SIP revisions within 12 months of EPA's final conditional approval, specifically May 9, 2020. Therefore, as authorized in CAA section 110(k)(3) and (k)(4), Pennsylvania was required to submit the following as case-by-case SIP revisions, by May 9, 2020, for EPA's approval as a condition of approval of 25 Pa. Code 128 and 129 in the May 16, 2016 SIP revision: (1) All facility-wide or system-wide averaging plans approved by PADEP under 25 Pa. Code 129.98 including, but not limited to, any terms and conditions that ensure the enforceability of the averaging plan as a practical matter (
                    *i.e.,*
                     any monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping, or testing requirements); and (2) all source-specific RACT determinations approved by PADEP under 25 Pa. Code 129.99, including any alternative compliance schedules approved under 25 Pa. Code 129.97(k) and 129.99(i); the case-by-case RACT determinations submitted to EPA for approval into the SIP should include any terms and conditions that ensure the enforceability of the case-by-case or source-specific RACT emission limitation as a practical matter (
                    *i.e.,*
                     any monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping, or testing requirements). See May 9, 2019 (84 FR 20274). Through multiple 
                    ( print page 41430)
                    submissions between 2017 and 2020, PADEP has submitted to EPA for approval various SIP submissions to implement its RACT II case-by-case determinations and averaging plans. This proposed rulemaking is based on EPA's review of one of these SIP revisions. II. Summary of SIP Revisions In order to satisfy a requirement from EPA's May 9, 2019 conditional approval, PADEP has submitted to EPA, SIP revisions addressing case-by-case RACT requirements for major sources in Pennsylvania subject to 25 Pa. Code 129.99. As noted in Table 1 of this document, on May 7 2020, PADEP submitted to EPA, a SIP revision pertaining to Pennsylvania's case-by-case NOX
                     and/or VOC RACT determinations for sources located at numerous major NOX
                     and VOC emitting facilities located in the Commonwealth. PADEP provided documentation in its SIP revisions to support its case-by-case RACT determinations for affected emission units at each major NOX
                     and VOC emitting facilities subject to 25 Pa. Code 129.99. In the Pennsylvania RACT SIP revision, PADEP included a case-by-case RACT determination for the existing emissions units at each of these major sources of NOX
                     and/or VOC that required a source specific RACT determination. In PADEP's RACT determinations an evaluation was completed to determine if previously SIP-approved, case-by-case RACT requirements (herein referred to as RACT I) were more stringent and required to be retained in the sources Title V air quality permit and subsequently, the Federally-approved SIP, or if the new case-by-case RACT requirements are more stringent and supersede the previous Federally-approved provisions. EPA, in this action, is taking action on sources at twenty-four major NOX
                     and/or VOC emitting facilities in Pennsylvania, subject to Pennsylvania's case-by-case RACT requirements, as summarized in Table 2. Table 2—Twenty-Four Major NO
                        X
                         and/or VOC Sources in Pennsylvania Subject to Case-by-Case RACT II Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
Major source (county)
1-Hour ozone RACT source? (RACT I)
Major source 
                             pollutant  
                             
                                (NO
                                X
                                 and/or VOC)
RACT II permit 
                             (effective date)Anvil International, LLC (formerly Grinnell Corporation) (Lancaster)
Yes
VOC
36-05019
                             (2/1/2019)ArcelorMittal Plate LLC Conshohocken Plant (formerly Bethlehem Lukens Plate) (Montgomery)
Yes
NO
                            X
                             and VOC
46-00011
                             (1/26/2018)Braskem America Inc. Marcus Hook (formerly Epsilon Products Co.—Marcus Hook) (Delaware)
Yes
VOC
23-00012
                             (3/2/2020)Buck Co Inc. Quarryville (formerly Buck Company Inc) (Lancaster)
Yes
VOC
36-05053
                             (4/1/2020)Calumet Karns City Refining LLC (formerly Penreco—Karns City) (Butler)
Yes
VOC
10-027H
                             (11/29/2018)Clarion Bathware Marble (Clarion)
No
VOC
16-00133
                             (12/19/2020)Domtar Paper Company Johnsonburg Mill (formerly Willamette Industries, Johnsonburgh Mill) (Elk)
Yes
NO
                            X
                             and VOC
24-00009
                             (2/25/2020)Exelon Generation Company LLC Croydon Generating Station (formerly PECO Energy Co.—Croydon Generating Station) (Bucks)
Yes
NO
                            X
09-00016
                             (4/11/2018)Georgia-Pacific Panel Products LLC Mt. Jewell MDF Plant (McKean)
Yes
NO
                            X
                             and VOC
42-158R
                             (1/2/2019)GE Transportation Grove City Engine (formerly GE Transportation Systems) (Mercer)
Yes
NO
                            X
                             and VOC
43-00196
                             (11/7/2019)GrafTech USA LLC St Marys (formerly The Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc) (Elk)
Yes
VOC
24-00012
                             (5/1/2019)Haysite Reinforced Plastics LLC Erie (Erie)
No
VOC
25-00783
                             (7/24/2019)INMETCO Ellwood City (formerly The International Metals Reclamation Co) (Lawrence)
Yes
NO
                            X
                             and VOC
37-00243
                             (12/6/2019)International Waxes Inc Farmers Valley (formerly Petrowax Refining) (McKean)
Yes
NO
                            X
                             and VOC
42-00011
                             (2/21/2020)Jeld Wen Fiber Division PA (Bradford)
Yes
NO
                            X
                             and VOC
08-00003
                             (9/21/2018)Mars Wrigley Confectionery US LLC Elizabethtown (Lancaster)
Yes
VOC
36-05142
                             (7/18/2019)Molded Fiber Glass Company Union City (formerly Molded Fiber Glass) (Erie)
Yes
VOC
25-00035
                             (2/5/2020)Monroe Energy LLC Trainer (formerly Conoco Phillips Company) (Delaware)
Yes
NO
                            X
                             and VOC
23-00003
                             (6/5/2017)Nova Chemicals Company Beaver (formerly Nova Chemicals, Inc.) (Beaver)
Yes
VOC
04-00033
                             (4/2/2020)Sasol Chemicals USA LLC (formerly Merisol Antioxidants LLC) (Venango)
Yes
VOC
61-00011
                             (2/16/2020)Silberline Manufacturing Company Lincoln Drive Plant (formerly Silberline Manufacturing Co) (Schuylkill)
Yes
VOC
54-00041
                             (3/16/2020)Superior Tube Company Lower Providence (formerly Superior Tube Company) (Montgomery)
Yes
VOC
46-00020
                             (2/5/2020)Victaulic Company Alburtis Facility (Lehigh)
Unknown *
VOC
39-00069
                             (10/24/2017)( print page 41431)Victaulic Forks Facility (Northampton)
Unknown **
VOC
48-0009
                             (10/24/2017)* PADEP records indicate that Victaulic Company Alburtis Facility may have been subject to RACT I requirements because PADEP technical review memos and operating permits issued to the facility in the past reference RACT I requirements. However, in reviewing the facility's files, PADEP could not produce a RACT I permit nor any files specific to the issuance of RACT I. Furthermore, RACT I requirements were never incorporated into the Pennsylvania SIP for Victaulic Alburtis. See PADEP comment and response document dated January 2020.** PADEP records indicate that Victaulic Forks Facility may have been subject to RACT I requirements because PADEP technical review memos and operating permits issued to the facility in the past reference RACT I requirements. However, in reviewing the facility's files, PADEP could not produce a RACT I permit nor any files specific to the issuance of RACT I. Furthermore, RACT I requirements were never incorporated into the Pennsylvania SIP for Victaulic Forks. See PADEP comment and response document dated January 2020.
 The case-by-case RACT determinations submitted by PADEP consist of an evaluation of all reasonably available controls at the time of evaluation for each affected emissions unit, resulting in a PADEP determination of what specific control requirements, if any, satisfy RACT for that particular unit. The adoption of new or additional controls or the revisions to existing controls as RACT were specified as requirements in new or revised Federally enforceable permits (hereafter RACT II permits) issued by PADEP to the source. The RACT II permits, which revise or adopt additional source-specific controls, have been submitted as part of the Pennsylvania RACT SIP revisions for EPA's approval in the Pennsylvania SIP under 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(1). The RACT II permits submitted by PADEP are listed in the last column of Table 2 of this document, along with the permit effective date, and are part of the docket for this rulemaking, which is available online at 
                    *https://www.regulations.gov,*
                     Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0380.[9]
                    
                     EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference in the Pennsylvania SIP, via the RACT II permits, source-specific RACT determinations under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for certain sources at major NOX
                     and VOC emitting facilities.[10] III. EPA's Evaluation of SIP Revisions After thorough review and evaluation of the information provided by PADEP for sources at twenty-four major NOX
                     and/or VOC emitting facilities in Pennsylvania included in its SIP revision submittal, EPA finds that PADEP's case-by-case RACT determinations and conclusions provided are reasonable and appropriately considered technically and economically feasible controls, while setting lowest achievable limits. EPA finds that the proposed source-specific RACT controls for the sources subject to this rulemaking action adequately meet the CAA RACT requirements for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the subject sources of NOX
                     and/or VOC in Pennsylvania, as they are not covered by or cannot meet Pennsylvania's presumptive RACT regulation. EPA also finds that all the proposed revisions to previously SIP approved RACT requirements, under the 1979 1-hour ozone standard (RACT I), as discussed in PADEP's SIP revisions, will result in equivalent or additional reductions of NOX
                     and/or VOC emissions and should not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or reasonable further progress with the NAAQS or interfere with other applicable CAA requirement in section 110(l) of the CAA. EPA's complete analysis of PADEP's case-by-case RACT SIP revisions is included in the TSD available in the docket for this rulemaking action and available online at 
                    *https://www.regulations.gov,*
                     Docket number EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0380. IV. Proposed Action Based on EPA's review, EPA is proposing to approve the Pennsylvania SIP revisions for case-by-case RACT determinations for individual sources at twenty-four major NOX
                     and VOC emitting facilities listed in Table 2 of this document and incorporate by reference in the Pennsylvania SIP, via the RACT II permits, source specific RACT determinations under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for those sources. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. As EPA views each facility as a separable SIP revision, should EPA receive comment on one facility but not others, EPA may take separate, final action on the remaining facilities. V. Incorporation by Reference In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference source specific RACT determinations via the RACT II permits as described in Sections II and III—Summary of SIP Revisions and EPA's Evaluation of SIP Revisions in this document. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through 
                    *https://www.regulations.gov*
                     and at the EPA Region III Office (please contact the person identified in the 
                    **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
                     section of this preamble for more information). VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: Is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 
                    ( print page 41432)
                    October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
                Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
                    *et seq.*);
                Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
                    *et seq.*);
                Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
                Does not have Federalism implications as specified inExecutive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
                Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject toExecutive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
                Is not a significant regulatory action subject toExecutive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
                Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and
                Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, underExecutive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rulemaking, addressing the NOX
                     and VOC RACT case-by-case requirements for individual sources at twenty-four facilities in Pennsylvania for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection
Air pollution control
Incorporation by reference
Nitrogen dioxide
Ozone
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Volatile organic compounds
 Dated: July 22, 2021. Diana Esher, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         A “major source” is defined based on the source's potential to emit (PTE) of NOX
                         or VOC, and the applicable thresholds for RACT differs based on the classification of the nonattainment area in which the source is located. See sections 182(c)-(f) and 302 of the CAA. Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         See December 9, 1976 memorandum from Roger Strelow, Assistant Administrator for Air and Waste Management, to Regional Administrators, “Guidance for Determining Acceptability of SIP Regulations in Non-Attainment Areas,” and also 44 FR 53762 (September 17, 1979). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         On February 16, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Cir. Court) issued an opinion on the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule. 
                        *South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist.*
                         v. 
                        *EPA,*
                         882 F.3d 1138 (D.C. Cir. 2018). The D.C. Cir. Court found certain parts reasonable and denied the petition for appeal on those. In particular, the D.C. Cir. Court upheld the use of NOX
                         averaging to meet RACT requirements for 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. However, the Court also found certain other provisions unreasonable. The D.C. Cir. Court vacated the provisions it found unreasonable. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                          EPA's NOX
                         RACT guidance “Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the General Preamble” (57 FR 55620; November 25, 1992) encouraged states to develop RACT programs that are based on “area wide average emission rates.” Additional guidance on area-wide RACT provisions is provided by EPA's January 2001 economic incentive program guidance titled “Improving Air Quality with Economic Incentive Programs,” available at 
                        *https://www.epa.gov/​sites/​production/​files/​2015-07/​documents/​eipfin.pdf.*
                         In addition, as mentioned previously, the D.C. Cir. Court upheld the use of NOX
                         averaging to meet RACT requirements for 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 
                        *South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist.*
                         v. 
                        *EPA,*
                         No. 15-1115 (D.C. Cir. February 16, 2018). Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         The September 15, 2006 SIP submittal initially included Pennsylvania's certification of NOX
                         RACT regulations; however, NOX
                         RACT portions were withdrawn by PADEP on June 27, 2016. Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         EPA's conditional approval of PADEP's May 16, 2016 SIP revision covered relevant sources located in both  Philadelphia and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         These requirements were initially approved as RACT for Pennsylvania under the 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS. The RACT I Rule was approved by EPA into the SIP on March 23, 1998. 63 FR 13789. Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         On August 27, 2020, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision vacating EPA's approval of three provisions of Pennsylvania's presumptive RACT II rule applicable to certain coal-fired power plants. 
                        *Sierra Club*
                         v. 
                        *EPA,*
                         No. 19-2562 (3rd Cir. August 27, 2020). None of the sources in this proposed rulemaking are subject to the three presumptive RACT II provisions at issue in that 
                        *Sierra Club*
                         decision. Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         The RACT II permits are redacted versions of a facility's Federally enforceable permits and reflect the specific RACT requirements being approved into the Pennsylvania SIP. Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         While the prior SIP-approved RACT I permit will remain part of the SIP, this RACT II rule will incorporate by reference the RACT II requirements through the RACT II permit and clarify the ongoing applicability of specific conditions in the RACT I permit. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2021-16279 Filed 7-30-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P