alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Diane LOGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-1523.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 25, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 29, 2011.

Diane Logan, Appellant Pro Se. Quinn E. N. Doggett, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appel-lee.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Diane Logan appeals the magistrate judge’s order* granting summary judgment for the Commissioner of Social Security in her action seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of social security benefits. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because *660Logan’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the magistrate judge’s disposition, Logan has forfeited appellate review of the magistrate judge’s order. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Wright, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jack Rosenberg, J.), rendered on May 7, 1984, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ross, Lynch and Kassal, JJ.
Case 1:02-cv-07771 Document 196 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 1
# C_2020036EN.01003101.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — Baustoffwerke Gebhart & Söhne v EUIPO (BOITON)

(Case T-255/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark BIOTON - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 36/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Baustoffwerke Gebhart & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG (Aichstetten, Germany) (represented by: E. Strauß, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Schäfer and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 February 2019 (Case R 1887/2018-4), relating to an application for registration of the word sign BOITON as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Baustoffwerke Gebhart & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Baustoffwerke Gebhart & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 144 (Friday, July 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 41073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Institutional Research 
Training Grants (IT).
    Date: August 24, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Center for Complementary and Integrative, 
Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Shiyong Huang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, 
NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20817, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57243f3e2e383930793f2236393017393e3f79303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="03706b6a7a6c6d642d6b76626d64436d6a6b2d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 26, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-16261 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing Research: Pullman, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                                    Software
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Safflower Genetic Resourcesheadline bar Main


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# Official Journal C 442/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 442 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5929 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 442

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5929 November 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 442/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8016 — Sanofi Pasteur/Vaccines of Sanofi Pasteur MSD) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 442/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8016 — Sanofi Pasteur/Vaccines of Sanofi Pasteur MSD) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 442/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2016/C 442/03 | Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (
  1
  ) | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 442/02

Euro exchange rates

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2016/C 442/03

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 442/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8243 — Allianz/NN Group/The FIZZ Student Housing) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 442/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8243 — Allianz/NN Group/The FIZZ Student Housing) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 173/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 173 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6220 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 173

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6220 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 173/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fourth supplement to the 37th complete edition | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 173/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fourth supplement to the 37th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Wayne MINTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-11286

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 17, 2011.

Matthew Joseph Kacsmaryk, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, William Ernest Hermesmeyer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gary Minter appeals the 24-month sentence he received after the revocation of his supervised release. He argues that the district court reversibly erred by failing to articulate adequate reasons for the sentence, which was above the range in the policy statements of the sentencing guidelines.

The plainly-unreasonable standard of review applies to revocation sentences. *United States v. Miller,*634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.2011), *petition for cert. filed*(May 27, 2011) (No. 10-10784). Minter, however, did not raise in the district court the arguments that he presents to this court, so our review is limited to plain error. *See United States v. Whitelaw,*580 F.3d 256, 259-60 (5th Cir.2009). Minter must show that there is an error that is clear or obvious and affects his substantial rights. *See Puckett v. United States,*556 U.S. 129, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 1429, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009). If those factors are established, this court has discretion to correct the forfeited error, but only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings. *Id.*

The district court explicitly stated at the sentencing hearing and in its written judgment that it had considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Moreover, the court’s comments throughout the sentencing hearing and in the written judgment reflect consideration of the factors in that section. The record establishes that *822the court considered the arguments that were presented to it and provided a reasoned basis for the sentence. *See Rita v. United States,*551 U.S. 338, 356, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); *Whitelaw,*580 F.3d at 262-65. The reasons therefore do not amount to clear or obvious error. *See Puckett,*129 S.Ct. at 1429. Further, Minter has failed to establish that the court would have imposed a lighter sentence on remand. *See Whitelaw,*580 F.3d at 264-65. Therefore, Minter has failed to establish reversible plain error. *See id.*

The judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael N. Murdock, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL N. MURDOCK                                              
|Michael N. Murdock Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|                                                                    
|Dated: May 3, 2005                                                  



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT *32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Anthony Q. Joffe, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-KSB"), that the Form 10-KSB fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-KSB.


Dated:  May 30, 2006


By:     /s/ Anthony Q. Joffe
        Anthony Q. Joffe, Chief Executive Officer


I, Anthony Q. Joffe, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-KSB"), that the Form 10-KSB fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
NetWorth Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-KSB.


Dated:  May 30, 2006


By:     /s/ Anthony Q. Joffe
        Anthony Q. Joffe, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                                Asta Funding Inc.
                                   Form 10-KSB
                               September 30, 2003

                 Exhibit Number 21- Subsidiaries of the Company


                          Asta Auto Receivables Company
                           E.R. Receivables Corp., LLC
                            RAC Acceptance Corp., LLC
                            Palisades Collection, LLC
                         Asta Funding Acquisition I, LLC
                        Asta Funding Acquisition II, LLC
                        Asta Funding Acquisition III, LLC
                              Computer Finance, LLC
                              Asta Funding.Com, LLC
                              Topps Promotion, LLC
                              Asta Commercial, LLC
                            Asta Business Credit, LLC
                          Palisades Acquisition I, LLC
                          Palisades Acquisition II, LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    33
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      33
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               28
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           5
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         5
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    11
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,910)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,910)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (5,238)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (5,238)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Holt, True Name Jerome Smith, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered on February 15, 1983, unanimously affirmed. Motion by appellant for leave to file a supplemental brief and for other relief denied. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Carro, Fein and Lynch, JJ.
#### In the Matter of State of New York, Respondent, v Charles S., Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 914] —

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10 for the civil management of Charles S., a sex offender allegedly requiring civil management, Charles S. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Dowling, J.), dated March 21, 2011, which, upon a jury verdict finding that he suffers from a mental abnormality as defined in Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 (i), and a determination, made after a dispositional hearing, that he currently is a dangerous sex offender requiring civil confinement, granted the petition and directed that he be committed to a secure treatment facility for care, treatment, and control until such time as he no longer requires confinement.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, clear and convincing *1343evidence supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the mental abnormality from which he suffers involves such a strong predisposition to commit sex offenses, and such an inability to control behavior, that he is likely to be a danger to others and to commit sex offenses if not confined to a secure treatment facility *(see*Mental Hygiene Law § 10.07 [f]; *Matter of State of New York v Walter W.,*94 AD3d 1177 [2012]; *Matter of State of New York v Jemal M.,*91 AD3d 961, 962 [2012]; *Matter of State of New York v Anonymous,*82 AD3d 1250, 1252 [2011]). Accordingly, upon that finding, the Supreme Court properly determined that the appellant is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement and properly directed that he be committed to a secure treatment facility for care, treatment, and control until such time as he no longer requires confinement. Angiolillo, J.P., Eng, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
#### Mary Brett MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CLINICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-60335

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 4, 2011.

Jim D. Waide, III, Esq., Rachel Marie Pierce, Waide & Associates, P.A., Tupelo, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Ernest Roland Malone, Jr., Esq., Kull-man Firm, New Orleans, LA, Leslie Pettis Barry, Kullman Firm, Columbus, MS, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mary Miller sued her employer for sex *974and pregnancy discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment for the employer.

The district court explained its ruling in a comprehensive Memorandum Opinion dated May 2, 2011, 2011 WL 1655920. The court concluded, *inter alia,*that no similarly-situated employee was treated more favorably than was plaintiff. The court also concluded that, even if a *prima facie*case had been established, the employer brought forth a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision to prohibit Miller from working at a particular facility because of her disruptive behavior.

The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *974published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.