alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019363EN.01002501.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/25

---

Action brought on 28 August 2019 – Healios v EUIPO – Helios Kliniken (Healios)

(Case T-591/19)

(2019/C 363/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Healios KK (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: P. Venohr, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Helios Kliniken GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Healios – Application for registration No 14 267 041

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2019 in Case R 341/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as the appeal was allowed and the contested application was rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as the appeal was allowed and the contested application was rejected;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Sufficient proofs of genuine use has not been provided, especially for ‘medical and bacteriology services’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Sufficient proofs of genuine use has not been provided, especially for ‘medical and bacteriology services’;

| — | There is no or low similarity of the goods and services, especially when comparing medical and bacteriology services in class 5; |
| --- | --- |

—

There is no or low similarity of the goods and services, especially when comparing medical and bacteriology services in class 5;

| — | The graphic element and the perception of the relevant public was not sufficiently assessed. |
| --- | --- |

—

The graphic element and the perception of the relevant public was not sufficiently assessed.

---
Case: 1:02-cr-00944 Document #: 11 Filed: 11/14/02 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:52
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective July 26, 2021, attaches to and forms part of that certain
Employment Agreement dated as of October 3, 2007, and as amended effective March 27, 2012, February 20, 2015, and April 19, 2018 (the “Agreement”), between Aon Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and
Christa Davies (the “Executive”). Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive mutually desire to extend the Employment Period for three years as provided in this Amendment. 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	 The phrase “April 1, 2023” where it appears in Section 1 of the Agreement shall be replaced with
“April 1, 2026.” 


  

	 	2.	 The remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in effect. 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date set forth above. 

 

					
	AON CORPORATION	 		 	EXECUTIVE
			
	 /s/ Lisa Stevens
	 		 	 /s/ Christa Davies

	Lisa Stevens	 		 	Christa Davies
	Executive Vice President &	 		 	Executive Vice President &
	Chief People Officer	 		 	Chief Financial Officer
----

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

2,05 % on 1 May 2005

Euro exchange rates (2)

3 May 2005

(2005/C 108/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
#### HARRY GREENFARB, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. ASSUNTA ARRE, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER.

November 14, 1960.

*Mr. Isidor Kalisch*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Balk & Jacobs*for the respondent.

Denied.
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Turid Sorensen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed this annual  report on Form 20-F of Nordic  American  Tanker
Shipping Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us
          by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's  disclosure  controls and
          procedures  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
          control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during the period
          covered by this annual  report  that has  materially  affected,  or is
          reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting.

5. The Company's other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
Company's  auditors and the audit  committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  Company's  internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: June 29, 2006

/s/ Turid Sorensen
---------------------
Turid Sorensen
Chief Financial Officer

SK 01318 0002 681624
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 11.1
                                      
                             GEOGRAPHICS, INC.
                                      
         STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE 

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                           --------------------
                                                       1997          1996        1995
                                                       ----          ----        ----
<S>                                             <C>            <C>          <C>
Net income (loss)                               $(7,950,301)   $1,232,024    $747,742

Weighted average common shares outstanding        9,322,278     6,606,499   4,549,101
                                                  ---------     ---------   ---------
Net income (loss) per share                         $ (0.85)       $ 0.19      $ 0.16
                                                    --------       ------      ------
                                                    --------       ------      ------
</TABLE>
#### RICHARD WEEKS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

October 17, 1960.

*Mr. Vincent P. Torppey*and *Mr. Jacob M. Goldberg*for the petitioner.

Granted.
**EXHIBIT 10.2**

 

**Radnor Holdings Corporation**

 

**Summary of 2005 Bonus Plan for Chief Executive Officer**

 

Set forth below is a summary of the 2005 Bonus Plan for the President and Chief Executive Officer of Radnor Holdings Corporation that was approved bythe Compensation Committee on March 29, 2005, to be effective for fiscal 2005. 

 

The CEO has a maximum bonus opportunity of $2.5 million. Fifty percent (50%) of the bonus opportunity is based on whether the Company achieves defined objectives for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation andamortization (“EBITDA”). The plan establishes quarterly EBITDA targets, with 25% of the bonus opportunity that is based on the EBITDA target being payable for each quarterly objective that is achieved. 

 

The other 50% of the bonus opportunity is based on the extent to which sixdifferent corporate goals are achieved. The goals relate to improving the Company’s operations, capital structure, balance sheet and liquidity. The amount of specific awards for achievement of the corporate goals is within the discretion of theCompensation Committee and their achievement is also reviewed on a quarterly basis. The Compensation Committee also retains the discretion to modify the corporate goals. 

 

Notwithstanding the plan requirements, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to adjust the amount of any bonuspayable under the plan on account of the EBITDA targets or corporate goals.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

March 28, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth St., NW
Washington, D.C. 20549-0609

RE: AUDIT OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
SYSTEME, ANWENDUNGEN, PRODUKTE IN DER DATENVERARBEITUNG, WALLDORF / BADEN, AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2001

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8070, we are filing this letter to disclose the
representations that were made to us by ARTHUR ANDERSEN
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft Steuerberatungsgesellschaft mbH ("ARTHUR
ANDERSEN") in connection with its audit of our consolidated financial
statements, as of December 31, 2001.

In its letter dated March   , 2002, Arthur Andersen represented to our
Supervisory Board that Arthur Andersen's audit was subject to its quality
control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen
personnel working on the audit, availability of national office consultation,
and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen to
conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Sincerely,


SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT SYSTEME,
ANWENDUNGEN, PRODUKTE IN DER
DATENVERARBEITUNG

PROF. DR. HENNING KAGERMANN


By: /s/ Henning Kagermann
   ------------------------------
Name: Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann
Title: Co-Chairman and CEO


DR. WERNER BRANDT


By: /s/ Werner Brandt
   ------------------------------
Name: Dr. Werner Brandt
Title: CFO
#### ONYAN, Appellant, v. BURNS et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 9, 1907.)

Action by Thomas Onyan against James Burns and others.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  261,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,739
<PP&E>                                          25,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,121,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          517,487
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,575,373
<COMMON>                                     3,442,141
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,121,354
<SALES>                                        577,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               606,937
<CGS>                                        3,147,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               931,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,471,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                               (137,337)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,608,955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 7, 2008 |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ F. William Conner  
|                  |  |  |  | Name:  |  | F. William Conner      
|                  |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
Description of Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement




 Exhibit 10.23 
 Description of Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement of Anthony L. Genito, effective as of August 28, 2009 
 Effective as of August 28, 2009, the board of directors of Spectrum Brands, Inc. increased the annual base salary of Anthony L. Genito to $425,000, which increase amended that certain Amendment to
the Employment Agreement, effective as of February 24, 2009, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Anthony L. Genito. At that time, Mr. Genito’s target long term incentive plan payout amount was also increased to 150% of his base
salary.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Bluefly,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
C. Barry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Patrick C. Barry
----------------------------
Patrick C. Barry
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2007
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Kari VALLES, also known as La Guera, Appellant.

No. 08-1454.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 22, 2008.

Filed: Jan. 12, 2009.

*22Tracy Lynne Perzel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.

Andrea K. George, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.

Kari Valles, Oklahoma City FTC, Oklahoma City, OK, pro se.

Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kari Valles challenges as unreasonable the 18-month prison sentence the district court1 imposed after revoking her supervised release. On appeal, she argues that the district court failed to properly weigh the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and that it was not enough for the court merely to list the factors. We affirm.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court’s discussion of the relevant sentencing factors was sufficient to allow for meaningful appellate review, *see United States v. Bear Robe,*521 F.3d 909, 910 (8th Cir.2008) (district court must adequately explain sentence to allow for meaningful appellate review), and that the sentence is not unreasonable, *see United States v. Larison, 432*F.3d 921, 922-23 (8th Cir.2006) (discussing review of revocation sentences for unreasonableness).

Significantly, the district court was authorized to convert Valles’s unserved home detention into an equivalent period of imprisonment, and add it to her Chapter 7 Guidelines range. *See*U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(d), p.s. (unserved home detention imposed in connection with sentence for which revocation is ordered shall be ordered served in addition to sanction determined under U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, p.s., and may be converted to equivalent period of imprisonment). Further, the court expressly stated that it had considered relevant section 3553(a) factors, *see United States v. Franklin,*397 F.3d 604, 606-07 (8th Cir.2005) (evidence that district court was aware of § 3553(a) factors is sufficient), and specifically mentioned the need to incarcerate Valles long enough for her to participate in and benefit from anger-management training, *see*18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(D) (court shall consider need for sentence imposed to provide defendant with medical care or other correctional treatment in most effective manner).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
# Official Journal C 154/11 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 154 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4711 June 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 154

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4711 June 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 154/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 154/1

Euro exchange rates

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

I Information

Commission

| 11.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 June 2004

(2004/C 154/01)

1 euro=

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2052 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4384 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6614 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1475 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5126 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,12 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,28 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5828 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,33 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,10 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6536 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4249 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5877 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 865 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,14 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,87 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 806 800 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7374 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6381 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3975 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9120 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0637 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 396,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0189 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2052

JPY

Japanese yen

131,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4384

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6614

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1475

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5126

ISK

Iceland króna

87,12

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,28

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5828

CZK

Czech koruna

31,33

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,10

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6536

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4249

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5877

ROL

Romanian leu

40 865

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,14

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,87

TRL

Turkish lira

1 806 800

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7374

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6381

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3975

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9120

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0637

KRW

South Korean won

1 396,96

ZAR

South African rand

8,0189

---

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---