alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32







CERTIFICATION








The undersigned
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2008 of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the “Company”) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











/s/ Philip K.
      Polkinghorn
            
            /s/ Peter A.
      HofmannName:
            Philip K.
      Polkinghorn
            
            Name:
            Peter A.
      HofmannTitle:
            President
            
            Title:
            Senior
      Executive Vice President andChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
            August 14,
      2008
            
            Date:
            August 14,
      2008








A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to PHL Variable Insurance Company and will be
retained by PHL Variable Insurance Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 95 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 13, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 58) disapproving the 
certification of the President under section 490(b) of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 regarding foreign assistance for Mexico during fiscal year 1997. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion or demand for 
division of the question except: (1) two hours of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
International Relations; (2) the amendment recommended by the Committee on 
International Relations now printed in the joint resolution, which shall be 
considered as read, shall be in order without intervention of any point of 
order, and shall not be separately debatable; (3) the further amendment 
specified in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, 
if offered by a Member designated in the report, which shall be considered as 
read, shall be in order without intervention of any point of order, and shall be 
separately debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (4) one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BANK OFAMERICA, N.A., successor by mergerto BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP, formerly known as COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Appellants,

v. No. 69904-1-
DIVISION ONE C35

I en UNPUBLISHED OPINION 3 THE CONDO GROUP, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company, Respondent. 

### FILED: OCT '6 2014 CD



### PER CURIAM - This appeal was stayed pending theWashington State Supreme Court's decision in BACHome Loans Servicing, LP v. Fulbright, 180 Wn.2d 754, 328 P.3d 895 (2014). The parties have now filed a "Stipulated Motion on the Merits to Reverse Trial CourtJudgment and Mandate to Superior 

### Court." Although this court suspended the motion on the merits procedure by general orderdated August 18, 2014, the stipulated reversal is equivalentto a concession oferror and will be treated as such. We acceptconcession oferror, 

### liftthe stay, and reverse and remandfor further proceedings consistentwith the decision in BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Fulbright. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. For the court: 

# r/\UAq>|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0247 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. HARRY RICHARDS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until September 9 , 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 6 2024

08/06/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0247
Case: 1:01-cv-00702 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/01/01 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1
Case: 1:01-cv-00702 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/01/01 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:2
Case: 1:01-cv-00702 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/01/01 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:3
Case: 1:01-cv-00702 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/01/01 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:4
Case: 1:01-cv-00702 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/01/01 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:5
Case: 1:01-cv-00702 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/01/01 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:6
Case: 1:01-cv-00702 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/01/01 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:7
Case: 1:01-cv-00702 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/01/01 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:8
Case: 1:01-cv-00702 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/01/01 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:9
#### In the Matter of Johnny Reed, Appellant, v Andrea D. Evans, as Chair of the Division of Parole, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 387]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McGrath, J.), entered August 24, 2011 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

We cannot say that the Board of Parole failed to comply with statutory requirements in rendering its determination denying petitioner’s request for parole release. A review of the record establishes that the Board considered the appropriate statutory factors, including petitioner’s program achievements, receipt of an earned eligibility certificate and positive disciplinary record since his last appearance before the Board. The Board, as required, also considered petitioner’s plans upon release, extensive criminal history and instant offense of forgery and drug possession. The fact that the Board did not “recite the precise statutory language of . . . Executive Law § 259-i (2) (c) (A) in support of its conclusion to deny parole” does not, as urged by petitioner, undermine its conclusion *(Matter of Silvero v Dennison,*28 AD3d 859, 860 [2006]). Inasmuch as petitioner has not established that the Board’s determination is tainted by “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety,’ ” judicial intervention is not warranted *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]; *see Matter of Silvero v Dennison,*28 AD3d at 860; *Matter of James v Chairman of N.Y. State Div. of Parole,*19 AD3d 857, 858 [2005]). Accordingly, the Board’s decision will not be disturbed. Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P, Lahtinen, Spain, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDLE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31,1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         861,297
<SECURITIES>                                   137,648
<RECEIVABLES>                                  580,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (65,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    477,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,121,178
<PP&E>                                       2,093,308
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,276,527)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,241,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,860,313
<BONDS>                                         62,476
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,950
<OTHER-SE>                                     301,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,241,429
<SALES>                                      1,033,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,038,057
<CGS>                                          821,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,424,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             474,794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,682,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,682,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,682,544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

In re: § Case No.

§

CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE'S FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT

Long Jr, Robert L 09 B 49515

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

§

§

Debtor

Marilyn O. Marshall, chapter 13 trustee, submits the following Final Report and Account of the

administration of the estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1302(b)(1). The trustee declares as follows:

 1) The case was filed on 12/31/2009.

 2) The plan was confirmed on (NA).

 3) The plan was modified by order after confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1329 

on (NA).

 4) The trustee filed action to remedy default by the debtor in performance under the

plan on (NA).

 5) The case was converted on 02/12/2010.

 6) Number of months from filing or conversion to last payment: 0.

 7) Number of months case was pending: 2.

 8) Total value of assets abandoned by court order: (NA).

 9) Total value of assets exempted: $1,910.00.

 10) Amount of unsecured claims discharged without full payment: $0.

 11) All checks distributed by the trustee relating to this case have cleared the bank. 

EASTERN DIVISION

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 09-49515 Doc 19 Filed 02/18/10 Entered 02/18/10 16:47:09 Desc Page 1

 of 4
Total paid by or on behalf of the debtor

Receipts:

$0

Less amount refunded to debtor $0

NET RECEIPTS: $0

Attorney's Fees Paid Through the Plan

Expenses of Administration:

$0

Court Costs $0

TOTAL EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION: $0

Trustee Expenses & Compensation $0

Other $0

Attorney fees paid and disclosed by debtor: $0

Scheduled Creditors:

Creditor

Name Class

Claim

Scheduled

Int.

Paid

Claim

Asserted

Claim

Allowed

Principal

Paid

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 09-49515 Doc 19 Filed 02/18/10 Entered 02/18/10 16:47:09 Desc Page 2

 of 4
Mortgage Ongoing

Summary of Disbursements to Creditors:

$0

Interest

Paid

Claim

Allowed

Principal

Paid

Secured Payments:

$0 $0

Mortgage Arrearage $0 $0 $0

Debt Secured by Vehicle $0 $0 $0

All Other Secured $0 $0 $0

TOTAL SECURED: $0 $0 $0

Domestic Support Arrearage $0

Priority Unsecured Payments:

$0 $0

Domestic Support Ongoing $0 $0 $0

All Other Priority $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PRIORITY: $0 $0 $0

GENERAL UNSECURED PAYMENTS: $0 $0 $0

Expenses of Administration

Disbursements:

$0

Disbursements to Creditors $0

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: $0

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 09-49515 Doc 19 Filed 02/18/10 Entered 02/18/10 16:47:09 Desc Page 3

 of 4
 12) The trustee certifies that the foregoing summary is true and complete, and all administrative

matters for which the trustee is responsible have been completed. The trustee requests a final decree be

entered that discharges the trustee and grants such other relief as may be just and proper. 

 This Uniform Form is associated with an open bankruptcy case, therefore, Paperwork 

Reduction Act exemption 5 C.F.R. § 1320.4(a)(2) applies. 

STATEMENT:

Date: February 16, 2010

Trustee

By:

/s/ MARILYN O. MARSHALL

UST Form 101-13-FR-S (09/01/2009)

Case 09-49515 Doc 19 Filed 02/18/10 Entered 02/18/10 16:47:09 Desc Page 4

 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 301 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 301

   Urging the people of the United States to observe October 2011 as 
              Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 20, 2011

Mr. Casey submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Urging the people of the United States to observe October 2011 as 
              Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month.

Whereas Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month is an appropriate time to 
        recognize the enormous contributions that Italian and Italian-American 
        people have made to the United States and the world throughout history, 
        including generals, admirals, philosophers, statesmen, musicians, 
        athletes, and Nobel Prize-winning scientists;
Whereas Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month salutes the Italian and 
        Italian-American community and expresses appreciation for the culture 
        and heritage of Italians and Italian Americans that has immeasurably 
        enriched the lives of the people of the United States and the world;
Whereas the strength and success of the United States, the vitality of 
        communities, and the effectiveness of society depend, in great measure, 
        upon the distinctive and sterling qualities demonstrated by various 
        ethnic groups and exemplified by members of the Italian and Italian-
        American community, who share their rich and unique heritage with all 
        people of the United States; and
Whereas it is fitting and proper that October 2011 be observed as Italian and 
        Italian-American Heritage Month throughout the United States: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the enormous contributions that Italian and 
        Italian-American people have made to the United States and the 
        world throughout history; and
            (2) urges the people of the United States--
                    (A) to acknowledge October 2011 as Italian and 
                Italian-American Heritage Month; and
                    (B) to observe the month with appropriate events 
                and activities.
                                 <all>
```
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 96-31138 

Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

KAREN BYRD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

AT&T CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-1656)

______________________________________________________

May 21, 1997

Before DAVIS, E. GARZA and STEWART, District Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

For reasons assigned by the magistrate judge in his thorough

memorandum ruling of October 16, 1996, the judgment of the district

court is

AFFIRMED.
2
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00031-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

233rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 233-685120-20

Before Wallach, Bassel, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE PAUL BENJAMIN RICH, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 9, 2023
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL H. LABIDOU,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3274

[December 20, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14CF002278AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### In the Matter of Home Mutual Insurance Co., Appellant. Walter Peplenski et al., Respondents.

—In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated September 23, 1984, which, after a hearing, *inter alia,*held that All City *670Insurance Company’s policy issued to Sun In Kim was properly canceled, and dismissed the application.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

On December 23, 1981, a vehicle owned by Edward J. Preston and Richard S. Preston and insured by petitioner Home Mutual Insurance Company (Home Mutual) collided with a vehicle owned and operated by one Sun In Kim. Respondent Walter Peplenski, who was a passenger in the Preston vehicle, sought arbitration against Home Mutual on the basis that Kim was uninsured.

In this proceeding, Home Mutual seeks a determination as to whether All City Insurance Co. (All City) properly canceled a policy of automobile insurance which it had issued to Kim, pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313.

" 'In a proceeding of this sort, where a hearing is required to determine whether the offending vehicle was insured at the time of the accident, the initial burden is upon the claimant’s insurer to come forward with proof that the offending vehicle was insured. Once a prima facie case is made out * * * the burden shifts to the offending vehicle’s purported insurer * * * to prove that the vehicle in question was never insured (see *Nassau Ins. Co. v Minor,*72 AD2d 576) or that the insurance had been canceled (see *Matter of Safeco Ins. Co. [Testagrossa],*67 AD2d 979). Where sufficient evidence is introduced to rebut the prima facie case, the claimant’s insurer must present additional proof of insurance in order to prevail’ (see, also, *Viuker v Allstate Ins. Co.,*70 AD2d 295)” *(Matter of Utica Mut. Ins. Co. [Bodie—Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.],*100 AD2d 592, 593, quoting from *Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Yeglinski,*79 AD2d 1029, 1029-1030).

During the hearing on the application to stay arbitration, All City produced a copy of its notice of cancellation as well as a certificate of mailing prepared by it in the regular course of business, thus creating a presumption as to the cancellation of the policy and compliance with the mailing requirements of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 *(see, Diaz v Great Am. Ins. Co.,*109 AD2d 775; *Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Peruche,*100 AD2d 935). The testimony of Kim that he had notified his broker by telephone of his change of address was not sufficient to overcome All City’s evidence of proper cancellation of the policy in accordance with the provisions of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00146-CR

JARAD FRANCIS COLA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-25908

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jarad Francis Cola was convicted by a jury of the offense of continuous 

sexual abuse of a child under the age of fourteen, a violation of Texas Penal Code 

section 21.02(b). TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.02(b). The jury assessed Cola’s 

punishment at life in prison, and the trial court sentenced him accordingly.

In one issue, Cola challenges the facial constitutionality of section 21.02. We will 

affirm.
Cola v. State Page 2

Cola concedes that he did not raise this issue at trial and raises it in this appeal to 

preserve the error for potential review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. A facial 

challenge to the constitutionality of a statute may not be raised for the first time on 

appeal. Karenev v. State, 281 S.W.3d 428, 434 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); therefore, Cola’s

complaint is not preserved for review. Id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a)(1). 

Accordingly, we overrule Cola’s sole issue and affirm the judgment of the trial 

court.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed April 27, 2022

Do not publish

[CRPM]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Sangamo BioSciences, Inc.
(the Company), that:

(1) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Edward O. Lanphier II                           
|Edward O. Lanphier II                               
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director     
|(Principal Executive Officer)                       
|February 16, 2011                                   
|                                                    
|/s/ H. Ward Wolff                                   
|H. Ward Wolff                                       
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)        
|February 16, 2011