alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
|-------------------------

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

To the knowledge of each of the undersigned, this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. for the applicable reporting period.

|      |                |     |                                          |                
|----- | -------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------- | ---------------
|Date: | March 30, 2009 | By: | /s/                                      | James A. Luksch
|      |                |     | James A. Luksch, Chief Executive Officer
|     
|      |                | By: | /s/                                      | Eric Skolnik   
|      |                |     | Eric Skolnik, Chief Financial Officer   

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,712
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                       918
<INVENTORY>                                     10,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,068
<PP&E>                                         156,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                (37,659)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,131
<BONDS>                                        132,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           40,309
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   196,786
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,093
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       333
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,490)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,159)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,649)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (298.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bernard J. Magee, Jr., Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Patsalos, J.), rendered August 29, 1984, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of *2Vs*to 7 years’ imprisonment.

Judgment affirmed.

In the instant case, the court initially granted defendant youthful offender treatment, but, after a conference at the Bench, revoked that adjudication.

The court has inherent power to correct errors made at the time of sentencing. This power " 'extends to a statement or even formal pronouncement made by a court which may create "apparent ambiguity” but "which is, plainly, the result of some inadvertence on his [the Judge’s] part, and which our reason tells us is a mere mistake” ’ ” *(People v Wright,*56 NY2d 613, 614, quoting from *People v Minaya,*54 NY2d 360, 365, *cert denied*455 US 1024, quoting *Bohlen v Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.,*121 NY 546, 550). Here, the court could not adjudicate defendant a youthful offender and still sentence him to *2V3*to 7 years in jail, as previously promised. CPL 720.20 and Penal Law § 60.02, when read together, provide that a youthful offender may not receive a sentence of more than four years *(see, People v David "H”,*70 AD2d 205). Therefore, it was within the court’s power to correct its sentence, which was illegal as it stood, by immediately revoking the youthful offender adjudication.

It was not an abuse of the court’s discretion to sentence defendant to a maximum prison term of seven years, thereby precluding the granting of youthful offender treatment. Defendant committed a particularly violent offense and there was ample evidence adduced to establish that defendant showed no remorse for his crime and remained a continued threat to the community. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Annual Report of Green Energy Group, Inc. (f/k/a eCom eCom.com,
Inc.) on
Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2011, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Green
Energy Group, Inc.



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: July
13, 2012 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                    |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Annual Report of Green Energy Group, Inc. (f/k/a eCom eCom.com,
Inc.) on Form 10-K for the period ended
May 31, 2011, (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that the information
contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Green Energy Group, Inc.



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: July
13, 2012 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                    |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,820,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,263,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,965,113)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,799,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,689,241
<PP&E>                                      41,486,499
<DEPRECIATION>                             (13,278,188)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             177,174,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,329,325
<BONDS>                                    159,454,462
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        109
<COMMON>                                           164
<OTHER-SE>                                 (39,582,642)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               177,174,564
<SALES>                                    178,461,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           178,461,997
<CGS>                                      171,546,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              171,546,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,688,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (7,772,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   165,898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,938,301)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,938,301)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond M. MARKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6180.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.

Raymond M. Marker, Appellant Pro Se. L. Patrick Auld, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*141PER CURIAM:

Raymond M. Marker seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Marker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
IIA 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 39 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2012 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. 

HARKIN, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Ms. 

MIKULSKI) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 

amendment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That notwithstanding any time limit contained in House 

4 Joint Resolution 208, 92d Congress, as agreed to in the 

5 Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment pro6 posed to the States in that joint resolution shall be valid 

7 to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution 

8 whenever ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of 

9 the several States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11


<TABLE>
                        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
<CAPTION>




                                                Year                 Year                  Year
                                                Ended                Ended                 Ended
                                          December 31, 1996    December 31, 1995     December 31, 1994
                                          -----------------    -----------------     -----------------




      <S>                                    <C>                 <C>                    <C>         
      Net loss-Limited Partners              $(4,824,512)        $(10,918,532)          $(8,383,297)
                                             ===========         ============           ===========

      Average Class A and B limited
       partnership interests outstanding             921                  921                   921
                                             ===========         ============           ===========

      Net loss per Class A and B limited
       partnership interest                  $    (5,238)        $    (11,855)          $     (9,102)
                                             ===========         ============           ===========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, the Chief Executive Officer of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the registrant), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date:May 14, 2008/s/ Philip K. PolkinghornName:Philip K. PolkinghornTitle:President
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Jack Gregory, certify that:



(1)    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Premier Holding Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2010;





(2)     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





(4)   The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





(5) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: October 1, 2010 | Jack Gregory
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001031003
<NAME> MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPTIAL TRUST II
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-6-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                               309,278,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,185,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           315,463,968
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             315,463,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,185,568
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                300,000,000
<COMMON>                                     9,278,400
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               315,463,968
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,896,909
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,896,909
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,896,909
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,896,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6185

GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

IMMIGRATION JUDGE; ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:09-cv-03442-WDQ)

Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 4, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gbeke Michael Awala, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gbeke Michael Awala, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 

U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Awala v. Immigration 

Judge, No. 1:09-cv-03442-WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 7, 2010). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 143 / Thursday, July 29, 2021 / Presidential Documents 40915 

Presidential Determination No. 2021–09 of July 23, 2021 

Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (22 U.S.C. 2601(c)(1)) (MRAA), 

I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the MRAA, that it is 

important to furnish assistance under the MRAA in an amount of up to 

$100 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected urgent refugee and migration needs, victims of conflict, and other persons at risk as a result of 

the situation in Afghanistan, including applicants for Special Immigrant 

Visas. Such assistance may be provided on a bilateral or multilateral basis 

as appropriate, including through contributions to international organizations 

and through funding to other nongovernmental organizations, governments, 

and United States departments and agencies. 

This determination supersedes Presidential Determination 2021–08 of June 

11, 2021. 

You are authorized and directed to submit this determination to the Congress, 

along with the accompanying Justification, and to publish this determination 

in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, July 23, 2021 

[FR Doc. 2021–16382 

Filed 7–28–21; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_MEMO1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>