[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 149 (Friday, August 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43187-43189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-051, C-570-052]


Certain Hardwood Plywood Products From the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Circumvention 
Determination and Notice of Amended Final Circumvention Determination 
Pursuant to Court Decision

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On July 21, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) 
issued its final judgment in Shelter Forest International Acquisition 
Inc., et al. v. United States, Consol. Court no. 19-00212, sustaining 
the Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s first remand redetermination 
pertaining to the anti-circumvention determination for the antidumping 
and countervailing duty orders on certain hardwood plywood products 
(plywood) from the People's Republic of China. In the underlying 
inquiry, Commerce originally found that plywood with face and back 
veneers of radiata and/or agathis pine that: (1) Has a Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA) or California Air Resources Board (CARB) label 
certifying that it is compliant with TSCA/CARB requirements; and (2) is 
made with a resin, the majority of which is comprised of one or more of 
the following three product types--urea formaldehyde, polyvinyl 
acetate, and/or soy (inquiry merchandise) was circumventing the orders, 
and was, therefore, included in the scope of the orders. Commerce is 
notifying the

[[Page 43188]]

public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's 
original anti-circumvention determination, and that Commerce is 
amending the anti-circumvention determination to find that inquiry 
merchandise is not circumventing the orders, and, therefore, is not 
included in the scope of the orders.

DATES: Applicable July 31, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Greenberg, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1110.

Background

    On November 29, 2019, Commerce found inquiry merchandise to be 
circumventing the scope of the Orders, and that, therefore, such 
merchandise should be included in the scope of those Orders.\1\ A 
number of foreign producers/exporters and U.S. importers, including 
Shelter Forest International Acquisition, Inc. (Shelter Forest) et al., 
IKEA Supply AG, Shanghai Futuwood Trading Co., Ltd. et al., and Taraca 
Pacific, Inc. et al., appealed Commerce's Final Anti-Circumvention 
Determination. On February 18, 2021, the CIT remanded the Final Anti-
Circumvention Determination to Commerce and directed that Commerce: (1) 
Explain why it is reasonable to require evidence of the actual TSCA or 
CARB label adhered to the product; (2) address a variety of evidentiary 
issues related to the composition of the glue used to produce the 
inquiry merchandise; and (3) accept, and consider, three submissions 
which either contained a translation error, was received late in the 
process, or contained new legal argument.\2\ Commerce complied with the 
Court's remand and accepted the identified submissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's 
Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 
Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 504 (January 4, 2018); 
and Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's Republic of 
China: Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 513 (January 4, 2018) 
(collectively, Orders); see also Certain Hardwood Plywood Products 
from the People's Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination 
of Circumvention of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 
84 FR 65783 (November 29, 2019) (Final Anti-Circumvention 
Determination).
    \2\ See Shelter Forest International Acquisition Inc., et al. v. 
United States, Consol. Court No. 19-00212, Slip Op. 21-19 (CIT 
February 18, 2021) (Remand Opinion and Order). The CIT further ruled 
that if, on remand, Commerce continues to reach an affirmative 
determination, Commerce must reconsider or further explain the cash 
deposit rates of the plaintiffs, amend the effective date of the 
affirmative determination, and notify the International Trade 
Commission of its determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its final remand redetermination, issued on May 10, 2021, 
Commerce found that additional information submitted pursuant to the 
CIT's Remand Opinion and Order demonstrated that Shelter Forest sold 
inquiry merchandise prior to December 8, 2016, and thus inquiry 
merchandise was commercially available prior to the initiation of the 
investigation (i.e., was not later-developed merchandise). Therefore, 
on remand, Commerce determined inquiry merchandise was not 
circumventing the Orders, and is not included in the scope of the 
Orders.\3\ In light of this finding, Commerce found it unnecessary to 
address the remaining directives by the CIT. The CIT sustained 
Commerce's final redetermination.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand: Shelter Forest International Acquisition Inc., et al. v. 
United States, Consol. Court No. 19-00212, Slip Op. 21-19 (CIT 
February 18, 2021) dated May 10, 2021 at 31. The CIT made additional 
findings, but Commerce was not required to address these other 
findings because they became moot as a result of the Shelter Forest 
determination.
    \4\ See Shelter Forest International Acquisition Inc., et al. v. 
United States, Consol. Court No. 19-00212, Slip Op. 21-90 (CIT July 
21, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\5\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\6\ 
the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to 
section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in 
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of 
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's July 21, 
2021, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in 
harmony with Commerce's Final Anti-Circumvention Determination. Thus, 
this notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements 
of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 
1990) (Timken).
    \6\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United 
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Anti-Circumvention Determinations

    In accordance with the CIT's July 21, 2021, final judgment, 
Commerce is amending its Final Anti-Circumvention Determination and 
finds that inquiry merchandise is not circumventing the Orders, and 
that the scope of the Orders does not include the products addressed in 
the Final Anti-Circumvention Determination.

Liquidation of Suspended Entries

    Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
that, pending any appeals, the cash deposit rate will be zero percent 
for the inquiry merchandise. In the event that the CIT's final judgment 
is not appealed or is upheld on appeal, Commerce will instruct CBP to 
liquidate any unliquidated entries of inquiry merchandise entered for 
consumption on or after September 18, 2018, without regard to 
antidumping and countervailing duties and to lift suspension of 
liquidation of such entries.
    At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from 
liquidating entries that were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption during the period September 18, 2018, through December 31, 
2020, for the following:
    (1) Imported by MJB Wood Group, Inc. (also known as MJB Wood Group, 
LLC) and:
    <bullet> Exported and produced by Lian Yungang Hong Yang Wood 
Industry Co. Ltd.;
    <bullet> exported by Suqian Yaorun Trade Co., Ltd. and produced by 
Pizhou Jiangshan Wood Co., Ltd.;
    <bullet> exported and produced by Foothill LVL and Plywood (Linyi) 
Co., Ltd.;
    <bullet> exported by China Link International (Huai'an) Co., Ltd. 
and produced by Lianyungang Ruixiang Wood Industry Co., Ltd.; or
    <bullet> exported and produced by Linyi Welling Wood Industry Hi-
Tech. Co., Ltd.;
    (2) imported by Taraca Pacific, Inc. and:
    <bullet> exported by Linyi Chengen Import and Export Co., Ltd. and 
produced by Linyi Dongfangjuxin Wood Co., Ltd.;
    <bullet> exported by Lianyungang Yuantai International Trade Co., 
LTD. and produced by Linyi City Lanshan District Fuerda Wood Factory;
    <bullet> exported and produced by Linyi Linhai Wood Co., Ltd.;
    <bullet> exported and produced by Linyi Glary Plywood Co., Ltd.; or
    <bullet> exported by Shandong Qishan International Trading Co., 
Ltd. and produced by Linyi Tuopu Zhixin Wooden Industry Co., Ltd.;
    (3) produced and/or exported by Xuzhou Shelter Import & Export Co. 
and Shandong Shelter Forest Products Co., Ltd.
    These entries will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the 
injunction during the pendency of any appeals process.

[[Page 43189]]

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: July 22, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-16081 Filed 8-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P