alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,492
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,209
<PP&E>                                          21,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,841
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,397
<SALES>                                         59,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,183
<CGS>                                           46,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (159)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (286)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (286)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 10-00071 Doc 6 Filed 02/26/10 Entered 02/26/10 18:32:54 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 8
Case 10-00071 Doc 6 Filed 02/26/10 Entered 02/26/10 18:32:54 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 8
Case 10-00071 Doc 6 Filed 02/26/10 Entered 02/26/10 18:32:54 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 8
Case 10-00071 Doc 6 Filed 02/26/10 Entered 02/26/10 18:32:54 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 8
Case 10-00071 Doc 6 Filed 02/26/10 Entered 02/26/10 18:32:54 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 8
Case 10-00071 Doc 6 Filed 02/26/10 Entered 02/26/10 18:32:54 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 8
Case 10-00071 Doc 6 Filed 02/26/10 Entered 02/26/10 18:32:54 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 8
Case 10-00071 Doc 6 Filed 02/26/10 Entered 02/26/10 18:32:54 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 8
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard A. MURDOCH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-11210

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Oct. 6, 2011.

H. Kyle Fletcher, Office of H. Kyle Fletcher, Oviedo, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Richard A. Murdoch, Pensacola, FL, pro se.

*516Before HULL, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

H. Kyle Fletcher, appointed counsel for Richard Murdoch in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murdoch’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of Alanah M. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Donnie M., Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 760]

— In a child neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated June 10, 2011, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that he neglected the subject child, and placed the father under the supervision of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services pursuant to enumerated terms and conditions for a period of one year.

*758Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

To establish neglect, the petitioner must demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, (1) that the child’s physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired, and (2) that the actual or threatened harm to the child is due to the failure of the parent or caretaker to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship *(see Nicholson v Scoppetta,*3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]; *see also*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). Under the facts of this case, including the strong negative inference which the Family Court was entitled to draw against the father upon his failure to testify at the fact-finding hearing *(see Matter of Delehia J. [Tameka J.],*93 AD3d 668 [2012]; *Matter of Christiana C. [Carleton C.],*86 AD3d 606, 607 [2011]; *Matter of Jasmine*A., 18 AD3d 546, 548 [2005]), the evidence was sufficient to support the Family Court’s finding of neglect against the father *(see Matter of Hannah A. [Jibrine A.],*84 AD3d 951, 952 [2011]; *Matter of Elijah J. [Phillip J.],*77 AD3d 835 [2010]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 345 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 345

  Expressing the sense of the Senate on the closure of Umatilla Army 
                        Chemical Depot, Oregon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2011

    Mr. Wyden (for himself and Mr. Merkley) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate on the closure of Umatilla Army 
                        Chemical Depot, Oregon.

Whereas, in December 2001, the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 
        year 2002 (Public Law 107-107) was signed into law, which included 
        authorization for a 2005 round of defense base closure and realignment 
        (BRAC);
Whereas, on February 16, 2004, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld included the 
        closure of the Umatilla Army Chemical Depot, Oregon, as one of his 
        recommendations for the 2005 round of defense base closure and 
        realignment;
Whereas, on September 8, 2005, the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
        Commission, in its report making recommendations to the President, found 
        that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld's assertion that the chemical 
        demilitarization mission at Umatilla would be complete by the 2nd 
        quarter of 2011 was optimistic, and wrote, ``An examination of status 
        information for the depot's mission completion and subsequent closure 
        revealed that dates may slip beyond the 6-year statutory period for 
        completion of BRAC actions.'';
Whereas, in that same report, the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
        Commission took the Secretary of Defense's recommendation ``Close 
        Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR'' and changed it to ``On completion of the 
        chemical demilitarization mission in accordance with treaty obligations, 
        close Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR'';
Whereas, by doing so, the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission 
        acknowledged that the closure of Umatilla Army Chemical Depot would 
        happen when the demilitarization mission is completed, even if that is 
        after September 15, 2011; and
Whereas Congress did not pass a joint resolution of disapproval with respect to 
        the Commission's report, and the report and recommendations became law: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That, in light of the clear history, the Senate 
reiterates its original intent and reaffirms its direction that the 
closure of the Umatilla Army Chemical Depot, Oregon, and subsequent 
management and disposal shall be carried out in accordance with 
procedures and authorities contained in the Defense Base Closure and 
Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 
U.S.C. 2687 note).
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Marjorie C. McCallum, Petitioner, v LeValley McLeod, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Kane, J.

Proceeding initiated in this court pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated December 18, 1984, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice based on age.

The determination should be confirmed. Petitioner’s allegations of discrimination are unsubstantiated and there was proof in the record that petitioner’s layoff was caused by economic problems encountered by her employer *(see, Matter of Waddington v General Elec. Co.,*103 AD2d 955). Finally, we find the claim that the investigation by the State Division of Human Rights was inadequate lacking in merit.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001001188
<NAME> CARNEGIE GROUP, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      13,483,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,954,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,315,705
<PP&E>                                       2,568,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,590,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,520,724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,079
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,003,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,590,804
<SALES>                                      1,430,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,406,261
<CGS>                                       19,085,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,954,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                181,959
<INCOME-TAX>                                    72,367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            109,592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   109,592
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                               AHL SERVICES, INC.

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE DATA)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    MARCH 31,
                                              --------------------
                                                2000         1999
                                              -------      -------

<S>                                           <C>          <C>
Income Applicable to Common Stock:
  Net income                                  $   289      $ 3,731
                                              =======      =======


Weighted Average Shares:
  Common shares                                16,967       16,475
  Common share equivalents applicable to
    stock options outstanding                     140          627
                                              -------      -------
  Weighted average common and common
    equivalent shares outstanding during
    the period                                 17,107       17,102
                                               =======     =======

Per Share Amount:
  Net income:
             Basic                            $  0.02      $  0.23
                                              =======      =======
             Diluted                          $  0.02      $  0.22
                                              =======      =======
</TABLE>


                                       12
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Board of Directors
PathoGenesis Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-05095 and 333-45571) on Form S-8 of PathoGenesis Corporation (a development
stage enterprise) of our report dated January 23, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of PathoGenesis Corporation as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1997 and for the period from December 10, 1991 (inception) through
December 31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report
on Form 10-K of PathoGenesis Corporation.

                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Seattle, Washington
March 30, 1998
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Joel Boyarski, theChief Financial Officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-Q ofWorldGate Communications, Inc., for the quarterly period ended March 31,2004 (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and(2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of WorldGateCommunications, Inc.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WorldGateand will be retained by WorldGate and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated: | May 14, 2004 | /s/ JOEL BOYARSKI                                          |   |
|--------|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |         |                                                       |
|   |         | Joel Boyarski,  Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 12 (b)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Phil Baker, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Lihir Gold Limited;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annualreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Dated: April 13, 2007
#### DAVIS, Respondent, v. DAVIS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 16, 1907.)

Action by Blanche E. Davis against George S. Davis.

No opinion. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without costs, with leave to renew.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Bryan M. Lemley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                                                 
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Bryan M. Lemley                             
|                       |  | Bryan M. Lemley,                                
|                       |  | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Street Properties Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, George J. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













Date:  May 4, 2010
/s/ George J. Carter

George J. Carter

President and Chief Executive Officer