alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 135/25 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 135 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6525 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 135

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6525 March 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 135/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 135/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 17 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 135/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 135/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

17

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 135/03 | State Aid – Spain – State aid SA.36228 (2020/C) (ex 2015/NN-2) – Alleged State aid to Fred Olsen at Puerto de las Nieves – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 20 |
| 2022/C 135/04 | State Aid – France – State aid SA.51268 (2021/C) (ex 2018/FC) – Alleged State aid to Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 40 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 135/03

State Aid – Spain – State aid SA.36228 (2020/C) (ex 2015/NN-2) – Alleged State aid to Fred Olsen at Puerto de las Nieves – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

20

2022/C 135/04

State Aid – France – State aid SA.51268 (2021/C) (ex 2018/FC) – Alleged State aid to Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

40

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,637
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,090
<PP&E>                                          16,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 396,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,775
<BONDS>                                        107,839
<COMMON>                                           326
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     230,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   396,397
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               596,101
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  451,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,609
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,394
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    940
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
#### Salvatore J. Licari, Also Known as Sam Licari, et al., Respondents, v New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 904]

Appeal from a judgment *1439(denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered April 6, 2011 in a breach of contract action. The judgment, among other things, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
# C_2020175EN.01002201.xml

| 25.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2020 — Gamma-A v EUIPO — Zivju pārstrādes uzņēmumu serviss (Packaging for foodstuffs)

(Case T-353/19) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing packaging for foodstuffs - Earlier design - Proof of disclosure - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - No different overall impression - Article 6(1)(b) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

(2020/C 175/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gamma-A SIA (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: M. Liguts, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zivju pārstrādes uzņēmumu serviss SIA (Riga) (represented by: J. Alfejeva, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2019 (Case R 2543/2017-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Piejūra SIA and Gamma-A.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gamma-A SIA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gamma-A SIA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Water Management Research: Parlier, CA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center
                                    Commodity Protection and Quality Research
                                    Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research
                                    National Arid Land Plant Genetic RepositorySearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Parlier, California San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center Water Management Research WMR





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News
- Main
- Awards
- Grants
- Recent Magazine Articles
- Collaborators
- Cooperators

Recent Magazine Articlesheadline bar **Canopy Cover: The Secret to Gauging Plants' Thirst** /is/AR/archive/jan09/canopy0109.htm  Finding Ways To Save Water in Peach Orchards /is/AR/archive/nov12/peach1112.htm  **Using Cactus as a Bioremediation Tool** /is/AR/archive/jan12/cactus0112.htm


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50147

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANGEL RAYMUNDO CRUZ, also known as Angel Varelas Gutierrez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:11-CR-2005-1

Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Angel Raymundo Cruz appeals from the sentences imposed for his guilty

plea convictions for attempted illegal reentry and for false personation in

immigration matters. The district court sentenced him to concurrent, withinguidelines terms of 27 months of imprisonment and did not impose a term of

supervised release. Cruz challenges the substantive reasonableness of the

sentences, arguing that his sentences are unreasonable because they are greater

than necessary to achieve the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 12, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-50147 Document: 00512081404 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/2012
No. 12-50147

contends that the illegal reentry Guideline, U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, is not empirically

based and resulted in the double counting of a prior drug conviction. He argues,

in reliance on Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85, 109-10 (2007), that the

presumption of reasonableness should not apply, but he concedes that his

argument is foreclosed by United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357,

366-67 (5th Cir. 2009), and he raises the argument to preserve it for possible

review by the Supreme Court. He further asserts that the guideline range

overstated the seriousness of the offense and failed to account for his benign

motive for reentering. 

Cruz’s argument that his guidelines range was greater than necessary to

meet § 3553(a)’s goals as a result of double counting is unavailing. See United

States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 529-31 (5th Cir. 2009). In addition, the district court

heard Cruz’s statement concerning his cultural assimilation and reasons for

reentering the United States before imposing a sentence within the advisory

guideline range. The district court considered the statutory sentencing factors

in § 3553(a) prior to imposing a sentence within the Guidelines. Cruz’s withinguidelines sentence is entitled to a presumption of reasonableness. See Rita v.

United States, 551 U.S. 338, 347 (2007). He has failed to show that the

presumption should not apply. The district court did not abuse its discretion in

imposing a sentence within the advisory guideline range. See Gall v. United

States, 552 U.S. 38, 50-51 (2007).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-50147 Document: 00512081404 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/12/2012
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFICER

Exhibit 32

Statement

Solely for the purposes of
complying with 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Sonic Foundry, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Dated: May 14, 2007 |  |  |  | 



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Rimas P. Buinevicius
|By:    |  | Rimas P. Buinevicius    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Kenneth A. Minor    
|By:    |  | Kenneth A. Minor        
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer 



25
# L_2013142EN.01S00301.xml

| 29.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 142/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 142/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
EXHIBIT  10.6

                                CONSENT AGREEMENT
                                -----------------


On  even  date herewith Amni International Petroleum Development Company Limited
(AAmni@)  and  Liberty  Technical  Services Ltd. (ALiberty@) have entered into a
Joint  Venture  Agreement  regarding  the  Deep  Zones  of  the  IMA Field.  All
capitalised  terms  used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed
to  such  terms  in  the  Joint  Venture  Agreement (AJoint Venture Agreement@).

Liberty has requested the consent of Amni to a pledge by Liberty of its interest
in  the  Joint  Venture  Agreement,  the Joint Operating Agreement and the other
agreements  executed  in  connection therewith (collectively, the AJoint Venture
Interests@)  to  Credit  Suisse  First Boston.  The pledge shall be accomplished
pursuant  to  the  form  of the Debenture attached hereto.  Such pledge is being
made  in accordance with the terms of a Credit Facility Agreement being executed
on even date herewith by Liberty, Abacan Resource Corporation, and certain other
subsidiaries  of  Abacan  Resource Corporation, as borrowers and guarantors, and
Credit  Suisse  First  Boston.

Amni  hereby consents to the granting of a pledge on the Joint Venture Interests
pursuant  to  the  terms  of  the  Debenture.

Liberty  Technical  Services  Ltd.


By:      /s/  Tunde  Folawiyo
         --------------------
Name:    Tunde  Folawiyo
         ---------------
Title:   Secretary
         ---------


Amni  International  Petroleum  Development  Company  Limited


By:      /s/  Tunde  Afolabi
         -------------------
Name:    Tunde  J.  Afolabi
         ------------------
Title:   Managing  Director/CEO
         ----------------------

[The  Debenture  referenced  herein  has  been filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Form
10-KSB  dated  effective  March  1,  1999.]

<PAGE>
#### Marcel Olifiers, Jr., et al., Appellants, v Town of Kent et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from water contamination, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Beisheim, J.), dated August 19,1983, which, upon the motion of the defendants Putnam County and Putnam County Board of Health to dismiss the complaint as against them for nonjoinder of the State of New York as a necessary party, dismissed the complaint as against all defendants “without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to pursue their claim against the defendants in the Court of Claims”.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. *(See, Baisley v Town of Kent,*111 AD2d 299.) Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the 1995 Long-Term Incentive and Stock Option Plan, the 1996
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan of Stockwalk Group, Inc. of our report dated May 8, 2001, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Stockwalk Group, Inc.,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2001.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


June 15, 2001











                                       52
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Carla MARSHALL, Appellant.

No. 11-2852.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 6, 2011.

Filed: Dec. 15, 2011.

Patrick J. Reinert, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Appellee.

Joanne M. Lilledahl, Assistant, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Appellant.

Carla Marshall, Waseca, MN, pro se.

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Carla Marshall appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking her supervised release. Upon careful review, we conclude that it was not unreasonable for the district court to sentence Marshall to a 4-month prison term, which was within the advisory Guidelines range and below the statutory maximum, followed by a 1-year supervised-release term, which was also authorized by statute. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(8) (maximum term of imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release is 2 years for Class C felony); 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h) (maximum term of supervised release upon revocation of supervised release is term of supervised release authorized by statute for offense that resulted in original term of supervised release, less any term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (requiring at least 3 years of supervised release, but not setting forth maximum term of supervised release); *United States v. Petreikis,*551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir.2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range); *United States v. Perkins,*526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir.2008) (district court need not make specific findings on 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; all that is generally required to satisfy appellate court is evidence that court was aware of relevant factors); *see also United States v. Tyson,*413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northem District of Iowa.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"), I, Sami S. Abbasi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge that:

         (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Sami S. Abbasi
----------------------------------------------------
Sami S. Abbasi
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 14, 2002