38978 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 139 / Friday, July 23, 2021 / Notices 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

I. Abstract 

The Commodity Flow Survey, a 

component of the 2022 Economic 

Census, is the only comprehensive and 

publicly available source of multimodal, 

system-wide data on the volume and 

pattern of goods movements in the 

United States. The Commodity Flow 

Survey is conducted in partnership with 

the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for 

Research and Technology, U.S. 

Department of Transportation. 

The Commodity Flow Survey data are 

used by policy makers and 

transportation planners in various 

federal, state, and local agencies to 

assess the demand for transportation 

facilities and services, energy use, safety 

risks, and environmental concerns. 

Additionally, business owners, private 

researchers, and analysts use the 

Commodity Flow Survey data for 

analyzing trends in the movement of 

goods, mapping spatial patterns of 

commodity and vehicle flows, 

forecasting demands for the movement 

of goods, and determining the needs for 

associated infrastructure and 

equipment. 

The survey provides data on the 

movement of commodities in the United 

States from their origin to destination. 

The survey produces summary statistics 

on value, tons, ton-miles and average 

miles by commodity, industry, and 

mode of transportation. The Census 

Bureau will publish these shipment 

characteristics for the nation, census 

regions and divisions, states, and CFS 

defined geographical areas. 

Primary strategies for reducing 

respondent burden in the Commodity 

Flow Survey include: Employing a 

stratified random sample of business 

establishments, requesting data on a 

limited sample of shipment records 

from each establishment with the option 

to provide all shipments in the week, 

accepting estimates of shipping activity, 

applying machine learning to code 

products based on their descriptions, 

providing electronic reporting and 

including the option for consolidated 

reporting of multiple locations through 

a single login for larger companies. 

II. Method of Collection 

The Commodity Flow Survey will be 

conducted on a sample of business 

establishments classified in mining, 

manufacturing, wholesale, and select 

retail and services industries, as defined 

by the North American Industry 

Classification System (NAICS). The 

survey will also cover auxiliary 

establishments (i.e., warehouses and 

managing offices) of multiestablishment companies. Each selected 

establishment will be surveyed four 

times, once during each calendar 

quarter of 2022. Quarters one and four 

will include a supplement with 

questions on hazardous materials 

packaging for companies that ship 

hazardous materials. Each questionnaire 

will ask the establishment to report data 

for up to 100 shipments for a 

predetermined reporting week. These 

data will include the value, net weight, 

commodity, and origin and destination 

of each selected shipment. Survey 

responses will be collected 

electronically, and respondents will 

have the option to provide all shipments 

for the reporting week instead of 

sampling shipments. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0932. 

Form Number(s): CFS 1000 (2022). 

Type of Review: Regular submission, 

Request for a Reinstatement, with 

Change, of a Previously Approved 

Collection. 

Affected Public: Business and other 

for-profit, small businesses or 

organizations. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

160,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: 2.5 

hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 1,600,000. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. (This is not the cost of 

respondents’ time, but the indirect costs 

respondents may incur for such things 

as purchases of specialized software or 

hardware needed to report, or 

expenditures for accounting or records 

maintenance services required 

specifically by the collection.) 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., 

Sections 8(b), 131 and 193; Title 49 

U.S.C., Section 6302. 

IV. Request for Comments 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department/Bureau to: (a) 

Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department, 

including whether the information will 

have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the 

accuracy of our estimate of the time and 

cost burden for this proposed collection, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (d) Minimize the 

reporting burden on those who are to 

respond, including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. We will include, or 

summarize, each comment in our 

request to OMB to approve this ICR. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you may ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Commerce 

Department. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15681 Filed 7–22–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–980] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules From the People’s Republic 

of China: Partial Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is partially rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on crystalline 

silicon photovoltaic cells (solar cells) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) for the period of review (POR) 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable July 23, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chien-Min Yang, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5484. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 2, 2020, Commerce 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on solar cells 

from China.1 Pursuant to requests from 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 139 / Friday, July 23, 2021 / Notices 38979 

to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 77431 

(December 2, 2020). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

8166 (February 4, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

3The petitioner is the American Alliance for 

Solar Manufacturing. 

4See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon 

Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into 

Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated May 5, 2021. 

5These eight companies are Canadian Solar 

International Limited (Canadian Solar), Jinko Solar 

Co., Ltd., Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. 

(collectively Jinko Solar), Shanghai JA Solar 

Technology Co., Ltd., JA Solar Technology 

Yangzhou Co., Ltd. JA Solar Co., Ltd. (a.k.a. JingAo 

Solar Co., Ltd.) (collectively JA Solar), Risen Energy 

Co., Ltd. (Risen), and Yingli Energy (China) Co., 

Ltd.(Yingli). 

6See Canadian Solar’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or 

Not Assembled into Modules from the People’s 

Republic of China: Request for Review,’’ dated 

December 29, 2020; see also Jinko Solar’s Letter, 

‘‘GDLSK Respondents Request for Administrative 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or 

Not Assembled into Modules (C–570–980)(POR: 01/ 

01/19–12/31/19),’’ dated December 31, 2020; JA 

Solar’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon 

Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into 

Modules from the People’s Republic of China: 

Request for Review,’’ dated December 29, 2020; 

Risen’s Letter, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Cells from the People’s Republic of China—Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated December 31, 

2020; and Yingli’s Letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled into Modules: Yingli’s 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

December 22, 2020. 

7See BYD’s Letter, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon 

Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into 

Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Request for Review—2019 Review 

Period,’’ dated May 5, 2021. 8See Initiation Notice, 86 FR at 8172–73. 

interested parties, on February 4, 2021, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of an administrative review 

with respect to 83 companies, in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 Subsequent to the initiation of the 

administrative review, the petitioner 3

timely withdrew its request for an 

administrative review of 19 companies 

on May 5, 2021.4 Eight 5 of the 19 

companies requested their own review 

of their entries and did not withdraw 

their requests for review.6 Thus, 

Commerce will only be rescinding this 

review with respect to the 11 companies 

for which a review request was received 

and subsequently withdrawn by the 

party(ies) requesting review. 

BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(BYD) also withdrew its self-requested 

review on May 5, 2021.7 However, the 

petitioner also requested a review of 

BYD and has not withdrawn the request; 

therefore, Commerce will not rescind 

the review with respect to BYD. There 

are active review requests on the record 

for the remaining 72 companies. 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested a review 

withdraws its request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation. All requests for an 

administrative review were withdrawn 

by the established deadline of May 5, 

2021, for the companies listed in the 

appendix. As a result, Commerce is 

rescinding this review with respect to 

these companies, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1). The administrative 

review will continue with respect to the 

remaining 72 companies listed in our 

Initiation Notice.8

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries. For the companies for which 

this review is rescinded, countervailing 

duties shall be assessed at rates equal to 

the cash deposit of estimated 

countervailing duties required at the 

time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of this 

rescission notice in the Federal 

Register. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: July 19, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

Companies Rescinded From Review 

1. Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

2. Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. 

3. Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd. 

4. Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance 

Co., Ltd. 

5. Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. 

6. Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd. 

7. Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd. 

8. Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd. 

9. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 

10. Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 

11. Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15742 Filed 7–22–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–909] 

Certain Steel Nails From the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Court 

Decision Not in Harmony With Final 

Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended 

Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court 

Decision 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 12, 2021, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

issued its final judgment in Midwest 

Fastener Corp. v. United States, Court 

No. 17–00231, sustaining the 

Department of Commerce’s 

(Commerce’s) remand redetermination 

pertaining to a scope ruling in which 

Commerce found Midwest Fastener 

Corp. (Midwest)’s strike pin anchors to 

be outside the scope of the antidumping 

duty (AD) order on certain steel nails 

from the People’s Republic of China. 

Commerce is notifying the public that 

the CIT’s final judgment is not in 

harmony with Commerce’s scope ruling, 

and that Commerce is amending the 

scope ruling to find that Midwest’s 

strike pin anchors are not covered by 

the order. 

DATES: Applicable July 22, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kelsie Hohenberger, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office V, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2517. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES