alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2
​

​
	​
	Jamie Brady

	​
	Chief Human Resources Officer

	​
	​



​
May 17, 2021
​
Pierre Caloz
​
RE:  Side Letter Agreement re Equity Grants
​
Dear Pierre,
​
Subject to Board of Directors approval at the next regularly scheduled uniQure N.V. Board meeting after the execution of this Agreement and subject to the commencement of employment pursuant to your employment agreement with uniQure biopharma B.V., uniQure N.V. (the “Company”) agrees to grant you:
​
		·
	Twenty-Five Thousand (25,000) restricted stock units of the Company (RSUs), such RSUs vesting pro-rata on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date;


		·
	An option to purchase Seventy-Five Thousand (75,000) ordinary shares of the Company, having an exercise price as of the closing share price on the date of grant, such option vesting over a period of four years, with one-quarter of the shares vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and the remaining shares vesting quarterly on a pro-rata basis during the remainder of the vesting period; and


		·
	A supplemental grant of Ten Thousand (10,000) RSUs vesting in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.


​
Each grant will be pursuant to uniQure N.V.’s Amended and Restated 2014 Share Incentive Plan, and the terms will otherwise reflect the standard vesting and other terms and conditions contained in the Share Incentive Plan and the Company’s standard equity grant agreements.
​
Such option will be approved by the Board of Directors of uniQure N.V. not later than at its next regularly scheduled meeting. If the Board fails to make the grants at such regularly scheduled meeting, it shall be deemed a good reason for termination of the employment agreement by you subject to the payment of severance.
​
You will be eligible for future equity grants pursuant to the Company’s policies and procedures.  Any additional grants during the first year of employment (not including those provided above) will be prorated based on hire date, and all future grants of equity shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement, including, without limitation, provisions related to change of control and termination.
​
	Sincerely,
	Agreed and Acknowledged:

	​
	​

	/s/ Jamie Brady
	/s/ Pierre Caloz

	​
	​

	Jamie Brady
	Pierre Caloz



​

uniQure |Paasheuvelweg 25a |1105BP Amsterdam
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bluefly, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Melissa Payner-Gregor,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Melissa Payner-Gregor
-------------------------
Melissa Payner-Gregor
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2008

									   24
Order entered April 22, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00207
- CV
WALTER O. AND TERREE L. PURICELLI, Appellant s V. SAXON MORT G AGE SERVICES, INC. , ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11
- 12790
- E 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellees’ April 18, 2013 motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. The Court DENIES the motion. The Court has been informed by the Dallas County District Clerk that appellant has neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee. If appellant does not provide documentation showing that he has done so within ten days, this case may be dismissed without further notice.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
# C_2020247EN.01000201.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — TN v WWK Lebensversicherung auf Gegenseitigkeit, VP

(Case C-803/19)

(2020/C 247/02)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TN

Defendants: WWK Lebensversicherung auf Gegenseitigkeit, VP

Interested party: UO

By order of 28 May 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eighth Chamber) rules as follows:

Article 35(1) in conjunction with Article 36(1) of Directive 2002/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 concerning life assurance, and Article 185(1) in conjunction with Article 186(1) of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), must be interpreted as not precluding a national provision according to which, in the event of the policyholder’s withdrawal from the insurance contract, the tax on insurance premiums which is owed by the policyholder and collected by the insurer and paid to the State is excluded from those amounts which the insurer is required to repay to the policyholder — who must therefore claim a tax refund from the tax administration or possibly damages from the insurer — in so far as the procedural provisions laid down by the law applicable to the insurance contract with respect to the reclaiming of sums paid by way of insurance premium tax are not such as to call in question the effectiveness of the policyholder’s right of cancellation under EU law, which it is for the referring court to ascertain.

---
Exhibit 32.1.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, David W. Hitchcock,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 27, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    DAVID W. HITCHCOCK                 
|                         |  |  |  | David W. Hitchcock Chief Financial Officer

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         254,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               53,165,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                (4,948,327)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,075,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,128,915
<PP&E>                                      38,497,135
<DEPRECIATION>                              (9,683,068)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             193,358,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       54,884,165
<BONDS>                                    172,231,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        109
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                 (35,393,893)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               193,358,618
<SALES>                                     59,175,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            59,175,294
<CGS>                                       58,317,837        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,317,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,880,164        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,022,707)         
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,847     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,036,554)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,036,554)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2019255EN.01005201.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/52

---

Action brought on 11 June 2019 — Bontempi and Others v EUIPO — Sand Cph (WhiteSand)

(Case T-350/19)

(2019/C 255/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Emanuela Bontempi (Montemarciano, Italy) and 6 others (represented by: S. Rizzo and O. Musco, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sand Cph A/S (Copenhagen, Denmark)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicants of the trade mark at issue: Applicants before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark WhiteSand — Application for registration No 16 416 596

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2019 in Case R 1913/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                             876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                       114
<INVENTORY>                                     16,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,569
<PP&E>                                          78,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,404)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,962
<BONDS>                                         90,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,563
<SALES>                                         68,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,559
<CGS>                                           55,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (63)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        36
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (2,043)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,800)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.



|                                 |  |                                           
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|Medallion Funding LLC            |  | New York                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Capital, Inc.          |  | Minnesota                                 
|                                 | 
|Freshstart Venture Capital Corp. |  | New York                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Bank                   |  | Utah                                      
|                                 | 
|Generation Outdoor, Inc.         |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Hamptons Holding LLC   |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Taxi Medallion Loan Trust III    |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Servicing Corp.        |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Fine Art, Inc.         |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|LAX Group, LLC                   |  | Delaware                                  



66
#### In re EDWARDS. In the matter of the application of Richard Edwards for admission to practice as attorney and counselor at law in the state of New York.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 8, 1898.)

No opinion. Application granted.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



/s/
Joseph R. Tomkinson
Joseph R. Tomkinson
Chief Executive Officer
March 16, 2010

/s/
Todd R. Taylor
Todd R. Taylor
Chief Financial Officer
March 16, 2010

---



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ismael LEONARDO-DOROTEO, also known as Ismael Leonardo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-51175

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 14, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bem-porad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ismael Leonardo-Doroteo (Leonardo) pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and was sentenced to a 46-month term of imprisonment, the lowest sentence in the applicable sentencing guidelines range of 46 to 57 months. He argues on appeal that his sentence is greater than necessary to satisfy the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

When, as here, the district court has imposed a sentence within a properly calculated guidelines range, the sentence is entitled to a presumption of reasonableness. *United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006). Review is for abuse of discretion. *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51-52, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

We have considered and rejected Leonardo’s argument that the Sentencing Guidelines overstate the seriousness of his offense by using a prior conviction to increase both his offense level and his criminal history score. *See, e.g., United States v. Duarte,*569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir.2009). His assertion that his illegal reentry was simply an international trespass is likewise unavailing. *See, e.g., United States v. Aguirre-Villa,*460 F.3d 681, 683 (5th Cir.2006). Leonardo properly acknowledges that his challenge to his sentence based on the lack of a “ ‘fast track’ ” program in the El Paso Division of the Western District of Texas is foreclosed by circuit precedent. *See United States v. Gomez-Herrera,*523 F.3d 554, 562-64 (5th Cir.2008). He has not shown that the sentencing court considered any irrelevant or improper factors or that the court made a “clear error of judgment” in weighing the § 3553(a) factors. *United States v. Cooks,*589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir.2009), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1930, 176 L.Ed.2d 397 (2010). Accordingly, Leonardo has failed to demonstrate that his sentence is unreasonable. *See Alonzo,*435 F.3d at 554.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-14-00413-CR

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN

Priscilla Aguilar Hernandez

Appellant

 

v.

 

The State of Texas

Appellee

On Appeal from the 452nd District Court of McCulloch County in Cause No. 5797

The Honorable Robert R. Hoffman, Judge Presiding

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time 

To File State’s Brief on Appeal

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, the State of Texas, by and through her duly elected District

Attorney, Appellee in the above styled and numbered cause, and respectfully enters

this “Motion for Extension of Time to File State’s Brief on Appeal,” and in support of

such Motion would show the Court:

I

Appellant was convicted in the Murder, and punishment was assessed at 30

years. The trial court imposed sentence on the May 23, 2014. Notice of Appeal was

timely filed with the clerk of the trial court.

II

The deadline for filing the State’s Brief with the Court is February 6, 2015. This

request for an extension is based upon the inability of counsel for the State to finish

research on the issues raised by the trial of the case. 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00413-CR

4002203

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

2/3/2015 1:55:44 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/3/2015 1:55:44 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
III

Counsel for the State would further show that she will require an additional

forty-five (45) days in which to complete the research and prepare the State’s Brief. 

This is the State’s first request for an extension of time in which to file its brief. 

Counsel would show that she has conferred with M. Patrick Maguire, counsel of

record for Appellant and would report that he does not oppose the request for an

extension.

Prayer

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned prays this

Honorable Court to grant the State’s motion for extension of time in which to file its

brief, and Order that the deadline for filing such be extended an additional forty-five

(45) days, until March 23, 2015, or until such time as set by this Court.

Respectfully submitted,

 

/s/ Tonya Spaeth Ahlschwede

 

Tonya Spaeth Ahlschwede

District Attorney, 452nd District Court

P.O. Box 635

Mason, Texas 76856

eMail: tsa@452da.net

Tel: 325-347-8400

Fax: 325-347-8404

State Bar Card No. 24025656

Attorney for the State of Texas

2
Certificate of Compliance and Delivery

This is to certify that: (1) this document, created using WordPerfectTM X7

software, contains 356 words, excluding those items permitted by Rule 9.4 (i)(1),

Tex.R.App.Pro., and complies with Rules 9.4 (i)(2)(B) and 9.4 (i)(3), Tex.R.App.Pro.;

and (2) on February 3, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

“Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time To File State's Brief on Appeal” was

transmitted via the eService function on the State's eFiling portal, to M. Patrick

Maguire (mpmlaw@ktc.com), counsel of record for the Appellant.

/s/ Tonya Spaeth Ahlschwede

Tonya Spaeth Ahlschwede

Counsel for the State of Texas

3
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 100 

Designating March 11, 2011, as ‘‘World Plumbing Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2011 

Mr. BENNET (for himself, Mrs. MURRAY, and Mr. MERKLEY) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 11, 2011, as ‘‘World Plumbing Day’’. 

Whereas the industry of plumbing plays an important role in 

safeguarding the public health of the people of the United 

States and the world; 

Whereas 884,000,000 people around the world do not have 

access to safe drinking water; 

Whereas 2,600,000,000 people around the world live without 

adequate sanitation facilities; 

Whereas the lack of sanitation is the largest cause of infection in the world; 

Whereas in the developing world, 24,000 children under the 

age of 5 die every day from preventable causes, such as 

diarrhea contracted from unclean water; 


EMCDONALD on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 100 IS 

Whereas safe and efficient plumbing helps save money and 

reduces future water supply costs and infrastructure 

costs; 

Whereas the installation of modern plumbing systems must 

be accomplished in a specific, safe manner by trained 

professionals in order to prevent widespread disease, 

which can be crippling and deadly to the community; 

Whereas the people of the United States rely on plumbing 

professionals to maintain, repair, and rebuild the aging 

water infrastructure of the United States; and 

Whereas Congress and plumbing professionals across the 

United States and the world are committed to safeguarding public health: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates March 11, 

2 2011, as ‘‘World Plumbing Day’’. 

Æ 


EMCDONALD on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS