alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001000230
<NAME>                        OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
<CURRENCY>                                    US-DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                       316
<INVENTORY>                                      8,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,464
<PP&E>                                          15,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,128
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,512
<SALES>                                         50,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,900
<CGS>                                           27,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    36
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    87
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,519
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,305
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,305
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.220
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.219


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 91 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 91

 To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to 
 the Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human 
                                person.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

 Mr. Wicker (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Burr, Mr. Vitter, 
Mr. Coburn, Mr. Thune, Mr. Risch, Mr. Coats, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Moran, Mr. 
 Boozman, and Mr. Paul) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to 
 the Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human 
                                person.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Life at Conception Act''.

SEC. 2. RIGHT TO LIFE.

    To implement equal protection for the right to life of each born 
and preborn human person, and pursuant to the duty and authority of the 
Congress, including Congress' power under article I, section 8, to make 
necessary and proper laws, and Congress' power under section 5 of the 
14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the 
Congress hereby declares that the right to life guaranteed by the 
Constitution is vested in each human being.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act:
            (1) Human person; human being.--The terms ``human person'' 
        and ``human being'' include each and every member of the 
        species homo sapiens at all stages of life, including, but not 
        limited to, the moment of fertilization, cloning, and other 
        moment at which an individual member of the human species comes 
        into being.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' used in the 14th article of 
        amendment to the Constitution of the United States and other 
        applicable provisions of the Constitution includes the District 
        of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each other 
        territory or possession of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020262EN.01002201.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation v EUIPO (Serviceplan)

(Case T-379/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark Serviceplan - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2020/C 262/29)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation GmbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: B. Koch and P. Schmitz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2019 (Case R 1424/2018-5) concerning an application for registration of the word sign Serviceplan as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.

---
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-92725 of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc., of
our report dated January 16, 2004 on the consolidated financial
statements of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and
2002 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2003 as included in the registrant's annual report on Form 10-K.


/s/Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Lexington, Kentucky
March 30, 2004


83
# Official Journal C 339/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 339 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5814 October 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 339

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5814 October 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 339/1 | Communication from the Commission — Automatic increase of an autonomous tariff quota under Council Regulation (EU) No 1220/2012 | 1 |
| 2015/C 339/2 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7770 — Vitol/VTTI) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2015/C 339/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7655 — Berkshire Hathaway/The Duracell Business) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 339/1

Communication from the Commission — Automatic increase of an autonomous tariff quota under Council Regulation (EU) No 1220/2012

1

2015/C 339/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7770 — Vitol/VTTI) (
  1
  )

1

2

2015/C 339/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7655 — Berkshire Hathaway/The Duracell Business) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 339/4 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 339/5 | EU-28 ethyl alcohol balance sheet for 2014 (Established on 24 September 2015 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003) | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 339/4

Euro exchange rates

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 339/5

EU-28 ethyl alcohol balance sheet for 2014 (Established on 24 September 2015 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003)

(Established on 24 September 2015 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO
RIGHTS AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS
AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of November 25, 2009,
between iBasis, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”), with
respect to the following:


 


A. The Company and the
Rights Agent entered into that certain Rights Agreement, dated as of July 30,
2009 (the “Rights Agreement”);


 


B. Pursuant to Section 27
of the Rights Agreement, the Company may, and the Rights Agent shall, if the
Company so directs, supplement or amend the Rights Agreement without the
approval of the holders of the Rights (as defined in the Rights Agreement); and


 


C.  The Special Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company has authorized the amendment of the Rights Agreement
to amend the Final Expiration Date (as defined in the Rights Agreement).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.
Amendment of the Rights Agreement. Clause (i) of
Section 7(a) of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety as follows:


 


“(i) the Close of
Business on November 25, 2009 (the “Final Expiration Date”),”


 


2.
Amendment Controls. If this Amendment conflicts with or is inconsistent
with any provision contained in the Rights Agreement, this Amendment shall
control. This Amendment shall be considered a part of the Rights Agreement.


 


3.
Governing Law. This Amendment shall be deemed to be a contract made
under the laws of the State of Delaware and for all purposes shall be governed
by and construed in accordance with the laws of such State applicable to
contracts made and to be performed entirely within such State.


 


4.
Counterparts; Facsimile and PDFs. This Amendment may be executed
in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all
purposes be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts shall together
constitute but one and the same instrument. A facsimile or .pdf signature
delivered electronically shall constitute an original signature for all
purposes.


 


(Signature Page Follows.)


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused
this Amendment to the Rights Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first
written above.


 


 


	
   

  	
  iBASIS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Mark S. Flynn

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Mark S. Flynn

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Chief Legal Officer and Corporate
  Secretary

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Dennis V. Moccia

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Dennis V. Moccia

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Manager, Contract Administration
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

p0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

139800-1 

PATRICIA PORTER, a/k/a PATRICIA 

HENKEL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139800 

 COA: 284086 

Wayne CC: 95-525527-DM 

EDWARD W. PORTER, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

PATRICIA GRAVEL-HENKEL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139801 

 COA: 285095 

Wayne CC: 95-525527-DM 

EDWARD W. PORTER, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 1, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT
13.1





PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with this Annual Report of Nordic American Tanker Shipping Limited.
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Herbjørn Hansson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.








Date:  May
21, 2010













Herbjørn
Hansson


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer











SK 01318
0002 1099648
EXHIBIT 31.2Certifications:I, Robert J. Devers, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metalline Mining Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [Intentionally omitted]c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any changes in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.       Dated: March 17, 2008 By /s/ Robert J. Devers             Robert J. Devers, Principal Accounting Officer
#### Diane Sheets, Respondent, v Scott Sheets, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 143]-

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered June 4, 2002, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Buetow, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated February 3, 2011, which, after a hearing, denied his motion for termination or downward modification of his maintenance obligation and, in effect, granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to enforce the obligation, and awarded maintenance arrears in the amount of *1199$40,600 to the plaintiff, and (2) an order of the same court dated April 12, 2011, which granted the plaintiffs motion for an award of counsel fees to the extent of awarding counsel fees in the amount of $5,625 to the plaintiffs attorney and additional counsel fees in the amount of $1,000 to the plaintiff.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant failed to demonstrate his entitlement to the termination or downward modification of his maintenance obligation. Although the defendant established that he lost his former employment through no fault of his own, and that this job loss qualified as a change in circumstances under the parties’ judgment of divorce, the record supports the court’s finding that the reversal of the defendant’s financial condition was created by his voluntary decision to decline another job offer. Under these circumstances, and because there is insufficient evidence in the record to demonstrate that the defendant engaged in good faith efforts to obtain employment commensurate with his qualifications and experience, the defendant failed to establish that a reduction in his maintenance obligation was warranted *(see Matter of Scotti v Scotti,*82 AD3d 1107, 1108 [2011]; *Matter of Lebron v Pringle,*77 AD3d 835, 836 [2010]).

Furthermore, under the facts presented, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for an award of counsel fees to the extent of awarding counsel fees in the amount of $5,625 to the plaintiffs attorney and additional counsel fees in the amount of $1,000 to the plaintiff *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b], [c]; § 238; *see generally Matter of Kotsonis v Notias,*78 AD3d 702, 702-703 [2010]; *Rodman v Friedman,*33 AD3d 400, 400-401 [2006]; *Green v Green,*288 AD2d 436, 437 [2001]). Mastro, A.P.J., Florio, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.
# C_2019312EN.01004401.xml

| 16.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/44

---

Action brought on 26 July 2019 — Sánchez Cano v EUIPO — Grupo Osborne (EL TORO BALLS Fini)

(Case T-527/19)

(2019/C 312/36)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Sánchez Cano, SA (Molina del Segura, Spain) (represented by C. Giner Mas and M. González Aleixandre, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Grupo Osborne, SA (El Puerto de Santa María, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark EL TORO BALLS Fini — Application for registration No 15 648 595

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 March 2019 in Case R 2690/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order the defendant to pay to the applicant the costs relating to and occasioned by the present application, as well as the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal; or, in the event that the other party in the contested decision appears as an intervener, order that the defendant and the other party in the contested decision be held jointly and severally liable to pay to the applicant the costs relating to and occasioned by the present application, as well as the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay to the applicant the costs relating to and occasioned by the present application, as well as the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal; or, in the event that the other party in the contested decision appears as an intervener, order that the defendant and the other party in the contested decision be held jointly and severally liable to pay to the applicant the costs relating to and occasioned by the present application, as well as the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of OVM International Holding
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ching Lung Po, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ching Lung Po
--------------------
Ching Lung Po
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002