# Official Journal C 180/22 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 180 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4822 July 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 180

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4822 July 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 180/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 180/2 | List of members of the European Security Research Advisory Board (ESRAB), set up by Commission Decision 2005/516/EC | 2 |
| 2005/C 180/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3821 — Rheinmetall/Diehl/AIM) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2005/C 180/4 | Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 385th meeting on 29 November 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/C.37.533 — Choline chloride | 4 |
| 2005/C 180/5 | Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 386th meeting on 6 December 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/C.37.533 — Choline chloride | 5 |
| 2005/C 180/6 | Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/37.533 — Choline chloride (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21) | 6 |
| 2005/C 180/7 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 of 25 February 2004, on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (
  1
  ) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 180/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 180/2

List of members of the European Security Research Advisory Board (ESRAB), set up by Commission Decision 2005/516/EC

2

2005/C 180/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3821 — Rheinmetall/Diehl/AIM) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2005/C 180/4

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 385th meeting on 29 November 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/C.37.533 — Choline chloride

4

2005/C 180/5

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 386th meeting on 6 December 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/C.37.533 — Choline chloride

5

2005/C 180/6

Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/37.533 — Choline chloride (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

6

2005/C 180/7

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 of 25 February 2004, on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (
  1
  )

1

8

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

I Information

Commission

| 22.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 July 2005

(2005/C 180/01)

1 euro=

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2187 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,21 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4638 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,696 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,457 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5603 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,43 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,952 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9552 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5738 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,17 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,56 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,696 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1239 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5618 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,5 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,969 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,617 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5942 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4782 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4679 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7791 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0207 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 261,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9947 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8836 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2995 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 900,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6311 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,955 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,825 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,474 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2187

JPY

Japanese yen

135,21

DKK

Danish krone

7,4638

GBP

Pound sterling

0,696

SEK

Swedish krona

9,457

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5603

ISK

Iceland króna

78,43

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,952

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9552

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5738

CZK

Czech koruna

30,17

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,56

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,696

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1239

RON

Romanian leu

3,5618

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,5

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,969

TRY

Turkish lira

1,617

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5942

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4782

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4679

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7791

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0207

KRW

South Korean won

1 261,78

ZAR

South African rand

7,9947

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8836

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2995

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 900,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6311

PHP

Philippine peso

67,955

RUB

Russian rouble

34,825

THB

Thai baht

50,474

---

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

| 22.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/2

---

List of members of the European Security Research Advisory Board (ESRAB), set up by Commission Decision 2005/516/EC (1)

(2005/C 180/02)

| Group 1:
  Security research demand requirement | Group 2:
  Technology supply chain requirements |
| --- | --- |
| Marek Adamczyk | Helmut Bachmayer |
| Christian Bréant | Rebecca Bowden |
| Antonio Cameli | Manuel Carpio Cámara |
| Fernando Carvalho Rodrigues | Giancarlo Grasso |
| Brian Cranmer | Rene Hannon |
| Maria Dali-Ziampaka | Markus Hellenthal |
| Bertrand de Cordoue | Páraig Hennessy |
| Thomas Engel | Heinz Hoch |
| Jean-Louis Gerstenmayer | Milan Holl |
| Jacek Gierlinski | Ülo Jaaksoo |
| Nicole Gnesotto | Henryk Jan Knapczyk |
| Frits Gronsveld | Graham Jordan |
| Jérôme Joly | Terry Knibb |
| Helmut Krünes | Stephan Lechner |
| Štefan Luby | Erik Löwenadler |
| Janez Mozina | Livio Marchesini |
| Tamas Rath | Gendrutis Mažylis |
| Stefan Silvestri | Manel Medina |
| Marino Simancas | Jacques Paccard |
| Jurgen Stock | Kristiina Rinkineva |
| Mark Stroud | Tim Robinson |
| Klaus Thoma | Carmen Rodriguez-Augustin |
| Frank Vanaverbeke | Madelene Sandström |
| Nuno Gonçalo Vieira Matias | John-Erik Stig Hansen |
| Alessandro Zanasi | Cees Van Duyvendijk |

Group 1:

Security research demand requirement

Group 2:

Technology supply chain requirements

Marek Adamczyk

Helmut Bachmayer

Christian Bréant

Rebecca Bowden

Antonio Cameli

Manuel Carpio Cámara

Fernando Carvalho Rodrigues

Giancarlo Grasso

Brian Cranmer

Rene Hannon

Maria Dali-Ziampaka

Markus Hellenthal

Bertrand de Cordoue

Páraig Hennessy

Thomas Engel

Heinz Hoch

Jean-Louis Gerstenmayer

Milan Holl

Jacek Gierlinski

Ülo Jaaksoo

Nicole Gnesotto

Henryk Jan Knapczyk

Frits Gronsveld

Graham Jordan

Jérôme Joly

Terry Knibb

Helmut Krünes

Stephan Lechner

Štefan Luby

Erik Löwenadler

Janez Mozina

Livio Marchesini

Tamas Rath

Gendrutis Mažylis

Stefan Silvestri

Manel Medina

Marino Simancas

Jacques Paccard

Jurgen Stock

Kristiina Rinkineva

Mark Stroud

Tim Robinson

Klaus Thoma

Carmen Rodriguez-Augustin

Frank Vanaverbeke

Madelene Sandström

Nuno Gonçalo Vieira Matias

John-Erik Stig Hansen

Alessandro Zanasi

Cees Van Duyvendijk

---

(1)  OJ L 191 of 22.7.2005, p. 71.

---

| 22.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/3

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3821 — Rheinmetall/Diehl/AIM)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 180/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 13 July 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG (‘Diehl’, Germany) and Rheinmetall AG (‘Rheinmetall’, Germany) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertaking AIM Infrarot-Module GmbH (‘AIM’, Germany) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 13 July 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG (‘Diehl’, Germany) and Rheinmetall AG (‘Rheinmetall’, Germany) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertaking AIM Infrarot-Module GmbH (‘AIM’, Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | Diehl: semifinished metal products, electronic controls, avionics and military technology, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

Diehl: semifinished metal products, electronic controls, avionics and military technology,

| — | Rheinmetall: automotive and military technology, |
| --- | --- |

—

Rheinmetall: automotive and military technology,

| — | AIM: infrared modules. |
| --- | --- |

—

AIM: infrared modules.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3821 — Rheinmetall/Diehl/AIM, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3821 — Rheinmetall/Diehl/AIM, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

---

| 22.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/4

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 385th meeting on 29 November 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/C.37.533 — Choline chloride

(2005/C 180/04)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment of the product and the geographic relevant markets contained in the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment of the product and the geographic relevant markets contained in the draft decision.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the analysis of the market's structure made by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the analysis of the market's structure made by the Commission.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the legal assessment made by the Commission, notably with the legal qualification of the facts as an agreement and/or concerted practice within the meaning of Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the legal assessment made by the Commission, notably with the legal qualification of the facts as an agreement and/or concerted practice within the meaning of Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's view that the cartel subject to this proceeding must be considered as a single and continuous infringement. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's view that the cartel subject to this proceeding must be considered as a single and continuous infringement.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission, that the agreement and/or concerted practice had as object and/or as effect a restriction of competition. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission, that the agreement and/or concerted practice had as object and/or as effect a restriction of competition.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreement and/or concerted practice had appreciably affected trade between Member States. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreement and/or concerted practice had appreciably affected trade between Member States.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the following companies which took part in the cartel:






  (a) | Akzo Nobel N.V., Akzo Nobel Netherlands B.V., Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V., Akzo Nobel Chemicals B.V. and Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals B.V., jointly and severally; |
| --- | --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the following companies which took part in the cartel:

(a)

Akzo Nobel N.V., Akzo Nobel Netherlands B.V., Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V., Akzo Nobel Chemicals B.V. and Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals B.V., jointly and severally;

| (b) | BASF A.G.; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

BASF A.G.;

| (c) | UCB S.A. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

UCB S.A.

| 8. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the method of calculation of the fines regarding the:






  (a) | gravity of the infringement, including differential treatment; |
| --- | --- | --- |

8.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the method of calculation of the fines regarding the:

(a)

gravity of the infringement, including differential treatment;

| (b) | duration of the infringement; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

duration of the infringement;

| (c) | attenuating and aggravating circumstances; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

attenuating and aggravating circumstances;

| (d) | applicability of the Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

applicability of the Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines.

| 9. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

9.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

| 10. | The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion. |
| --- | --- |

10.

The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion.

---

| 22.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/5

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 386th meeting on 6 December 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/C.37.533 — Choline chloride

(2005/C 180/05)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines for Akzo Nobel, BASF and UCB. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines for Akzo Nobel, BASF and UCB.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase of the basic amount due to aggravating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase of the basic amount due to aggravating circumstances.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the basic amount due to attenuating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the basic amount due to attenuating circumstances.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the fines based on the 1996 Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines in cartel cases. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the fines based on the 1996 Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines in cartel cases.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion.

---

| 22.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/6

---

Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/37.533 — Choline chloride

(pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(2005/C 180/06)

The draft decision in the abovementioned case gives rise to the following observations:

The Commission's investigation of a potential infringement of Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Treaty in the chorine chloride industry was initiated following an application for leniency submitted further to the Commission's 1996 Notice on Non-imposition or reduction of Fines in Cartel Cases (‘Leniency Notice’).

A Statement of Objections (‘SO’) was sent on 23 May 2003 to fourteen parties considered on a preliminary basis to have participated in the cartel, namely:

| — | Akzo Nobel N.V; Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V; Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V; Akzo Nobel Chemicals B.V; Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals B.V; Akzo Nobel Chemicals SpA. (‘Akzo Nobel’) |
| --- | --- |

—

Akzo Nobel N.V; Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V; Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V; Akzo Nobel Chemicals B.V; Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals B.V; Akzo Nobel Chemicals SpA. (‘Akzo Nobel’)

| — | BASF A.G. (‘BASF’) |
| --- | --- |

—

BASF A.G. (‘BASF’)

| — | Bioproducts Incorporated (‘Bioproducts’) |
| --- | --- |

—

Bioproducts Incorporated (‘Bioproducts’)

| — | Chinook Group Limited; Chinook Group Inc; Chinook Group Limited Partnership. (‘Chinook’) |
| --- | --- |

—

Chinook Group Limited; Chinook Group Inc; Chinook Group Limited Partnership. (‘Chinook’)

| — | DuCoa, L.P. (‘DuCoa’) |
| --- | --- |

—

DuCoa, L.P. (‘DuCoa’)

| — | UCB S.A. (‘UCB’) |
| --- | --- |

—

UCB S.A. (‘UCB’)

| — | Ertisa S.A. (‘Ertisa’) |
| --- | --- |

—

Ertisa S.A. (‘Ertisa’)

Access to the file was provided by CD-ROM. All parties provided written observations on the SO within the time limit provided.

All parties except for DuCoa participated in an oral hearing that took place on 16 September 2003.

During the hearing an additional document from one of the parties' replies to the SO was distributed on the basis that it contained information in support of the Commission's objections that might be relied upon in the final decision. The parties concerned were given the opportunity to comment on this document. Bioproducts and Chinook also commented following the hearing on the issue of immunity from fines.

In the course of the procedure Chinook drew the attention of the Hearing Officer to the apparent mishandling of the case by the Commission services resulting from the fact that part of its file had been mislaid, in particular documents handed over by Chinook that it claimed were relevant for the application of the Leniency Notice. In order to redress the situation, copies of the documents concerned had been obtained and placed in the file. Reference to the documents was included in the SO and the documents themselves included on the CD-ROM. Therefore, this incident, whilst unfortunate, had not affected Chinook's rights to be heard. (The original file was also eventually retrieved.)

Following the parties' replies to the SO and the oral hearing the objections set out in the SO against Ertisa have been dropped. The same applies to Akzo Nobel Chemicals SpA. In addition, the duration of the infringement has been reduced for Chinook and Bioproducts, as a result of which the imposition of fines is time barred. The time bar also applies to DuCoa.

The draft decision submitted to the Commission only contains objections in respect of which the parties have been afforded the opportunity of making known their views.

In the light of the above, I consider that the rights of the parties to be heard have been respected in this case.

Brussels, 2 December 2004.

Serge DURANDE

---

| 22.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/8

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 of 25 February 2004, on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2005/C 180/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| Aid No | XS 83/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | West Wales And The Valleys Objective 1 Area |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | ETHOS — An Innovative Business Environment For Knowledge Based SMEs |
| Legal basis | The Industrial Development Act 1982 |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 2 090 254 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes | |
| Date of implementation | From 1.11.2004 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.12.2004 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | Yes |
| Limited to specific sectors | No |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 83/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

West Wales And The Valleys Objective 1 Area

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

ETHOS — An Innovative Business Environment For Knowledge Based SMEs

Legal basis

The Industrial Development Act 1982

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 2 090 254

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes

Date of implementation

From 1.11.2004

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.12.2004

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Yes

Limited to specific sectors

No

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

Welsh European Funding Office

Address:

| Cwm Cynon Business Park |
| --- |
| Mountain Ash, CF45 4ER |

Cwm Cynon Business Park

Mountain Ash, CF45 4ER

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

| Aid No | XS 103/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Bo'ness, West Lothian |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | AW Jenkinson (Woodwaste) Limited |
| Legal basis | Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211) |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 45 800 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes — Aid intensity = 15 % | |
| Date of implementation | From 7.3.2003 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.3.2004 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | |
| Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 103/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Bo'ness, West Lothian

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

AW Jenkinson (Woodwaste) Limited

Legal basis

Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 45 800

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes — Aid intensity = 15 %

Date of implementation

From 7.3.2003

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.3.2004

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services (Recycling Companies)

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)

Address:

The Old Academy, 21 Horsefair, Banbury, OX16 OAH

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

| Aid No | XS 105/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Article 87(3)(a) Assisted Area in the Merseyside Region of the UK (Kirkby, Liverpool) |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | White Moss Horticulture Limited |
| Legal basis | Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211) |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 567 789 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes — Aid intensity = 27% | |
| Date of implementation | From 8.9.2004 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.3.2005 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | |
| Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 105/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Article 87(3)(a) Assisted Area in the Merseyside Region of the UK (Kirkby, Liverpool)

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

White Moss Horticulture Limited

Legal basis

Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 567 789

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes — Aid intensity = 27%

Date of implementation

From 8.9.2004

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.3.2005

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services (Recycling Companies)

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)

Address:

The Old Academy, 21 Horsefair, Banbury, OX16 OAH

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

| Aid No | XS 106/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Glastonbury, Somerset, BA6 9SP |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | EJ Godwin Limited |
| Legal basis | Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211) |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 87 437 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes — Aid intensity = 15 % | |
| Date of implementation | From 1.12.2004 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.3.2005 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | |
| Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 106/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Glastonbury, Somerset, BA6 9SP

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

EJ Godwin Limited

Legal basis

Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 87 437

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes — Aid intensity = 15 %

Date of implementation

From 1.12.2004

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.3.2005

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services (Recycling Companies)

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)

Address:

The Old Academy, 21 Horsefair, Banbury, OX16 OAH

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

| Aid No | XS 107/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Lochgelly, Fife, Scotland KY3 8LL |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Realm Construction Limited |
| Legal basis | Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211) |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 68 118 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes — Aid intensity = 27,5% | |
| Date of implementation | From 4.11.2003 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.3.2004 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | |
| Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 107/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Lochgelly, Fife, Scotland KY3 8LL

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Realm Construction Limited

Legal basis

Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 68 118

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes — Aid intensity = 27,5%

Date of implementation

From 4.11.2003

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.3.2004

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services (Recycling Companies)

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)

Address:

The Old Academy, 21 Horsefair, Banbury, OX16 OAH

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

| Aid No | XS 108/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Coatbridge, Lanarkshire, Scotland ML5 2EQ |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Reigart Contracts Limited |
| Legal basis | Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211) |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 119 786 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes — Aid intensity = 20 % | |
| Date of implementation | From 19.3.2004 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.3.2004 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | |
| Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 108/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Coatbridge, Lanarkshire, Scotland ML5 2EQ

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Reigart Contracts Limited

Legal basis

Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 119 786

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes — Aid intensity = 20 %

Date of implementation

From 19.3.2004

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.3.2004

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services (Recycling Companies)

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)

Address:

The Old Academy, 21 Horsefair, Banbury, OX16 OAH

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

| Aid No | XS 109/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Article 87(3)(c) Assisted Area in the Midlands Region of the UK (Stechford, Birmingham) |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Coleman & Company Limited |
| Legal basis | Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211) |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 390 741 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes — Aid intensity = 30 % | |
| Date of implementation | From 15.4.2004 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.12.2004 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | |
| Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 109/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Article 87(3)(c) Assisted Area in the Midlands Region of the UK (Stechford, Birmingham)

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Coleman & Company Limited

Legal basis

Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 390 741

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes — Aid intensity = 30 %

Date of implementation

From 15.4.2004

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.12.2004

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services (Recycling Companies)

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)

Address:

The Old Academy, 21 Horsefair, Banbury, OX16 OAH

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

| Aid No | XS 110/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Wolvey, Leicestershire |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Power Plane Limited |
| Legal basis | Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211) |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 104 884 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes — Aid intensity = 15 % | |
| Date of implementation | From 18.6.2003 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.3.2004 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | |
| Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 110/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Wolvey, Leicestershire

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Power Plane Limited

Legal basis

Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 104 884

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes — Aid intensity = 15 %

Date of implementation

From 18.6.2003

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.3.2004

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services (Recycling Companies)

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)

Address:

The Old Academy, 21 Horsefair, Banbury, OX16 OAH

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

| Aid No | XS 111/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Article 87(3)(c) Assisted Area in the Manchester Region of the UK (Droylsden, Manchester) |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | GI Hadfield & Son Limited |
| Legal basis | Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211) |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 379 363 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes — Aid intensity = 25 % | |
| Date of implementation | From 13.2.2002 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.3.2004 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | |
| Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 111/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Article 87(3)(c) Assisted Area in the Manchester Region of the UK (Droylsden, Manchester)

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

GI Hadfield & Son Limited

Legal basis

Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 379 363

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes — Aid intensity = 25 %

Date of implementation

From 13.2.2002

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.3.2004

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services (Recycling Companies)

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)

Address:

The Old Academy, 21 Horsefair, Banbury, OX16 OAH

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

| Aid No | XS 112/04 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Article 87(3)(c) Assisted Area in the Yorkshire Region of the UK (Wath-upon-Dearne, Rotherham) |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | T K Lynskey Excavations Limited |
| Legal basis | Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211) |
| Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | GBP 573 788 |
| Loans guaranteed |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation | Yes — Aid intensity = 30 % | |
| Date of implementation | From 12.9.2003 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.3.2004 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to SMEs | Yes | |
| Economic sectors concerned | All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs | |
| Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| — | Coalmining |

Aid No

XS 112/04

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Article 87(3)(c) Assisted Area in the Yorkshire Region of the UK (Wath-upon-Dearne, Rotherham)

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

T K Lynskey Excavations Limited

Legal basis

Section 153 Environmental Protection Act 1990 and Financial Assistance for Environmental Purposes (No 2) Order 2000 (SI 2000:2211)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

Loans guaranteed

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

GBP 573 788

Loans guaranteed

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(6) and Article 5 of the Regulation

Yes — Aid intensity = 30 %

Date of implementation

From 12.9.2003

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.3.2004

Objective of aid

Aid to SMEs

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

All sectors eligible for aid to SMEs

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

—

Coalmining

| — | All manufacturing |
| --- | --- |

—

All manufacturing

or

Steel

Shipbuilding

Synthetic fibres

Motor vehicles

Other manufacturing

| — | All services |
| --- | --- |

—

All services

or

Transport services

Financial services

Other services (Recycling Companies)

Yes

Name and address of the granting authority

Name:

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)

Address:

The Old Academy, 21 Horsefair, Banbury, OX16 OAH

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

Yes

---