alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Metalline Mining Company (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Merlin D. Bingham,
      President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Merlin D. Bingham


President








Dated:
      September 18, 2006
Exhibit 10.3




The Depository Trust Company 

A subsidiary of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation



BLANKET ISSUER LETTER OF REPRESENTATIONS 


ETFS PALLADIUM TRUST


June 25, 2009

(Date)


Attention: Underwriting Department

The Depository Trust Company 

55 Water Street, 1SL 

New York, NY 10041-0099 



Ladies and Gentlemen: 


          This letter sets forth our understanding with respect to all issues (the “Securities”) that Issuer shall request to be made eligible for deposit by the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). 


Issuer is formed under the laws of the State of New York. 


          To induce DTC to accept the Securities as eligible for deposit at DTC, and to act in accordance with DTC’s Rules with respect to the Securities, Issuer represents to DTC that issuer will comply with the requirements stated
in DTC’s Operational Arrangements, as they may be amended from time to time. 

	
Note:    	    	
      Very truly yours,    
	
Schedule A contains statements that DTC believes    	    	 	   
	
accurate describe DTC, the method of effecting      	    	
      ETFS PALLADIUM TRUST,    
	
book-entry transfers of securities distributed      	    	 	   
	
through DTC, and certain related matters.   	    	
      by ETF Securities USA LLC, as sponsor        
	     
	
Received and Accepted      	    	By:	/s/
            Greg Burgess
	
THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY        	    	 	
(Authorized Officer’s Signature) 
	     
	
By:        	/s/ The Depository Trust Company	    	 	Greg
        Burgess 
	       	 	 	 	(Print Name)
	 	 	 	 	 
	         	    	 	Ordnance
            House, 31 Pier Road, St. Helier JE48 PW
	       	 	 	 	(Street Address)
	 	 	 	 	 
	         	    	 	Jersey,
            Channel Islands
	                                   	 	 	(City, State, Country, Zip)
	 	 	 
	    	 	011-44-77-997-8005
	 	 	(Phone Number)
	 	 	 
	    	 	Greg.Burgess@etfsecurities.com
	    	 	
(Email Address)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sylvester Jackson, Appellant.

—Appeal defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Ritter, J.), rendered May 22, 1981, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, as we must *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), defendant’s guilt of the crime of assault in the first degree was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Contrary to defendant’s assertions that the gun went off during a struggle, the testimony of the People’s witnesses established that defendant pivoted and aimed the shotgun at the doorway, where the victim was standing. In addition, defendant’s claim that the shooting was accidental is refuted by the fact that a number of the People’s witnesses saw defendant pause, while he was pursuing the victim, and reload the shotgun. Defendant’s conduct before, during and after the commission of the crime was properly considered by the jury on the question of intent *(see,*1 CJI [NY] 9.31 p 503; *see also, People v Pereau,*64 NY2d 1055; *People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296). There was sufficient evidence for the jury to infer the requisite criminal intent.

We reject the argument that under the circumstances of this case an acquittal on the charged crime of attempted murder requires a reversal of the assault conviction. We note that defendant requested that the court charge the crime of assault in the first degree as a lesser included offense. Where the defendant has requested the court to charge a lesser included offense, he may not argue on appeal that the evidence will not sustain a conviction on the lesser charge *(see, People v Holliday,*74 AD2d 993).

We also reject defendant’s argument that the trial court *624erred in denying his motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30. The court, after conducting a hearing to resolve questions of fact *(see,*CPL 330.40 [2] [f]), found that defendant failed to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, the facts essential to support the motion *(see,*CPL 330.40 [2] [g]). We agree, and see no basis for disturbing the determination regarding questions of fact based upon the credibility of the witnesses who testified *(see, People v Lakomec,*94 AD2d 892).

Defendant’s remaining arguments were not preserved for appellate review and are, in any event, without merit. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7288

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALISON LEVON BOYD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (1:08-cr-00493-MJH-1)

Submitted: January 20, 2011 Decided: February 15, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam 

opinion.

Alison Levon Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Stuart Galyon, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

By notice filed September 14, 2010, Alison Levon Boyd 

appeals the district court’s four pre-judgment orders entered on 

April 19, 2010. With regard to the order denying the motion for 

the return of property submitted under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e), 

we conclude we have jurisdiction and affirm for the reasons 

cited by the district court. United States v. Boyd, No. 1:08-

cr-00493-MJH-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2010). Because no appealable 

final judgment was entered when Boyd filed his notice of appeal 

and because a second notice of appeal has since been filed from 

the final judgment, we dismiss the appeal from the remaining 

orders. See United States v. Pardee, 356 F.2d 982 (4th Cir. 

1966). The appeal from the final judgment is sufficient to 

raise every question arising from the proceedings below. We 

deny as moot Boyd’s motions for appointment of counsel and for 

transcripts. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; 

DISMISSED IN PART
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the report on Form 10-K/A of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., (the Company) for
the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
June 28, 2005
    
    By:/s/
    
    Mary Jane RobertsonMary Jane Robertson
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or its staff, upon request.
Case: 1:02-cv-04340 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/23/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:190
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 42 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 42

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relative to parental rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2012

 Mr. DeMint (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. 
 Enzi, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Lee, Mr. Graham, Mr. Grassley, and Mr. Risch) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relative to parental rights.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, 
education, and care of their children is a fundamental right.
    ``Section 2. Neither the United States nor any State shall infringe 
this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest, as 
applied to the person, is of the highest order and not otherwise 
served.
    ``Section 3. This article shall not be construed to apply to a 
parental action or decision that would end life.
    ``Section 4. No treaty may be adopted nor shall any source of 
international law be employed to supersede, modify, interpret, or apply 
to the rights guaranteed by this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 55 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a correction 

in the enrollment of H.R. 1627. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2012 

Mr. HARKIN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 

a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1627. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 

3 1627) an Act to amend title 38, United States Code, to 

4 furnish hospital care and medical services to veterans who 

5 were stationed at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, while 

6 the water was contaminated at Camp Lejeune, to improve 

7 the provision of housing assistance to veterans and their 

8 families, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House 

9 of Representatives shall make the following correction: in 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 55 ATS 

1 section 201, strike ‘‘Andrew Connelly’’ and insert ‘‘An2 drew Connolly’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4598-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-4598-DR), dated May 4, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 7, 2021.

      ( print page 38738)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 4, 2021.

Clay, Holmes, Quitman, Webster, and Wilkinson Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2021-15636 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 100 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 100

         Designating March 11, 2011, as ``World Plumbing Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2011

 Mr. Bennet (for himself, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Merkley) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Designating March 11, 2011, as ``World Plumbing Day''.

Whereas the industry of plumbing plays an important role in safeguarding the 
        public health of the people of the United States and the world;
Whereas 884,000,000 people around the world do not have access to safe drinking 
        water;
Whereas 2,600,000,000 people around the world live without adequate sanitation 
        facilities;
Whereas the lack of sanitation is the largest cause of infection in the world;
Whereas in the developing world, 24,000 children under the age of 5 die every 
        day from preventable causes, such as diarrhea contracted from unclean 
        water;
Whereas safe and efficient plumbing helps save money and reduces future water 
        supply costs and infrastructure costs;
Whereas the installation of modern plumbing systems must be accomplished in a 
        specific, safe manner by trained professionals in order to prevent 
        widespread disease, which can be crippling and deadly to the community;
Whereas the people of the United States rely on plumbing professionals to 
        maintain, repair, and rebuild the aging water infrastructure of the 
        United States; and
Whereas Congress and plumbing professionals across the United States and the 
        world are committed to safeguarding public health: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates March 11, 2011, as ``World 
Plumbing Day''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 4.21**
**Bonus Schedule Board Members 2004**(“Tantiemeregelung”)

**Bonus Schedule 2004**
12 monthly base salaries
**Bonus Schedule**
On achievement of target:     > 98 % Bonus equal to 12 monthly salaries> 96 %   11> 94 %   10> 92 %   9> 90 %   8> 88 %   7> 86 %   6> 84 %   5> 82 %   4> 80 %   3> 78 %   2> 76 % Bonus equal to 1 monthly salary

**Accelerator**for overachievement: 3 % of the target achievement excess **> € 1.88 billion.**
**The target for 2004 is as follows:**
The “operating income of the SAP Group excluding costs for share-based compensation programsand acquisition-related expenditures” (pro forma operating income) with a (100%) target value of €1.88 billion will form the basis for the 2004 bonus schedule. For the purposes of determining thecalculation base for bonuses, a rise in ACTUAL value will be linked with software revenue growth:Software revenue growth of up to +10% will result in an increase of € 10 million for each 1%, andthereafter in an increase of € 20 million for each 1%.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

d0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138368

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138368 COA: 288693 Oakland CC: 2007-217140-FH DANIEL JAMES MCKELVIE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presen ted should be reviewed by th is Court. For purposes of MCR 6.502(G)(1), the Court notes that, contrary to the Court of A ppeals characterization of the defendant’s application as relating to a motion for relief from judgment, the defendant’s application sought leave to appeal a judgment of convic tion. The application was properly denied, however, due to the la ck of merit in the grounds presented.
- 1 -

 
4. Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Credit Agreementremain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. All terms defined in the CreditAgreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment. This Amendment and the CreditAgreement shall be read together, as one document.5. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in the CreditAgreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth therein. Borrower further certifies that as of thedate of this Amendment there exists no Event of Default as defined in the Credit Agreement, nor anycondition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both wouldconstitute any such Event of Default.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of theday and year first written above.           STARTEK, INC.   WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION             By: /s/ David Durham    By: /s/ Wendee Crowley   TITLE: EVP/CFO     Wendee Crowley, Vice President             By: /s/ Sylvia A. Church         TITLE: VP Controller                   STARTEK, INC.                   By: /s/ David Durham         TITLE: EVP/CFO                   By: /s/ Sylvia A. Church         TITLE: VP Controller        
 
- 2 -
# Official Journal C 133A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.133.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 133A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 544 May 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.133.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 133A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 544 May 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 133A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — third supplement to the 29th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 133A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — third supplement to the 29th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David Jose ROBINSON, a/k/a Crockett, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-8085.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2009.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2009.

*744David Jose Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Jose Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*