alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 230 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 230

  Expressing the sense of the Senate that any agreement to reduce the 
 budget deficit should not include cuts to Social Security benefits or 
                           Medicare benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2011

Mr. Whitehouse (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Brown of 
Ohio, Mr. Merkley, and Mr. Franken) submitted the following resolution; 
             which was referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate that any agreement to reduce the 
 budget deficit should not include cuts to Social Security benefits or 
                           Medicare benefits.

Whereas over 34,000,000 retired workers currently receive Social Security 
        benefits in amounts that average a modest $14,100 a year;
Whereas, in 2008, 23 percent of retired workers receiving Social Security 
        benefits depended on those benefits for all or almost all of their 
        income;
Whereas according to AARP, Social Security benefits kept 36 percent of seniors 
        out of poverty in 2008;
Whereas reducing Social Security benefits would cause many seniors to have to 
        choose between food, drugs, rent, and heat;
Whereas 95 percent of seniors in the United States, who numbered almost 
        37,000,000 in 2008, got their health care coverage through the Medicare 
        program;
Whereas without Medicare benefits, seniors, many of whom live off of Social 
        Security benefits, would have to turn to the costly and uncertain 
        private market for health care coverage;
Whereas the Social Security program and the Medicare program are extremely 
        successful social insurance programs that permit seniors in America to 
        retire with dignity and security after a lifetime of hard work; and
Whereas the Social Security program and the Medicare program help relieve young 
        American families from worry about their own futures, allowing freedom 
        of opportunity in America: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any agreement to 
reduce the budget deficit should not include cuts to Social Security 
benefits or Medicare benefits.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022073EN.01003401.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI)

(Case T-556/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI - Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Similarity between services and goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2022/C 73/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, S. Baran, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fontana Food AB (Tyresö, Sweden) (represented by: P. Nihlmark and L. Zacharoff, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 May 2019 (Case R 1284/2018-4) relating to opposition proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Fontana Food.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 May 2019 (Case R 1284/2018-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 May 2019 (Case R 1284/2018-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Cyprus; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Cyprus;

| 3. | Orders Fontana Food AB to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Fontana Food AB to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.

---
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 36 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION 

4 HALL OF THE CAPITOL. 

5 The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the United 

6 States Capitol are authorized to be used on January 21, 

7 2013, by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 

8 Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and cere9 monies conducted for the inauguration of the President10 elect and the Vice President-elect of the United States. 

Passed the Senate March 1, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 36 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To authorize the use of the rotunda and EmanciStates. elect and the Vice President-elect of the United conducted for the inauguration of the President- connection with the proceedings and ceremonies sional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in pation Hall of the Capitol by the Joint Congres-
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 56 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 56

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
August 2, 2012, through Monday, August 6, 2012, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, 
September 10, 2012, or such other time on that day as may be specified 
by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or 
adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of 
this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the 
House adjourns on any legislative day from Thursday, August 2, 2012, 
through Monday, August 6, 2012, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, September 10, 2012, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the 
House, shall notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, 
to reassemble at such place and time as they may designate if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate August 2, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 56

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**I, David W. Williams, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Noble Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: February 29, 2008   /s/ DAVID W. WILLIAMS David W. Williams  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Noble Corporation
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

 

KEVIN WILLIAM GOLDSTEIN 

 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2119 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

Board File No. C2-14-286 

(United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, No. D2014-10; Supreme Court of 

Delaware, No. 427, 2014) 

Attorney Registration No. 61385 

(Chester County) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM: 

 AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2015, Kevin William Goldstein having

been excluded on consent from the practice of patent, trademark and other non-patent 

matters by Order of the United States Patent and Trademark Office dated March 31, 

2014, and thereafter having been transferred to disability inactive status by Order of the 

Supreme Court of Delaware dated August 18, 2014; the said Kevin William Goldstein 

having been directed on December 18, 2014, to inform this Court of any claim he has 

that the imposition of disability inactive status in this Commonwealth would be 

unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is 

 ORDERED that Kevin William Goldstein is immediately transferred to 

disability inactive status pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 216, for an indefinite period and until 

further Order of the Court and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles La Mar, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the trial court exceeded the bounds of permissible questioning of defendant’s witnesses *(see, People v Mees,*47 NY2d 997, 998; *People v Mendes,*3 NY2d 120, 121), defense counsel failed to preserve this issue for our review as a matter of law *(see, People v Charleston,*56 NY2d 886). Nor did he preserve for such review any error committed by the sentencing court *(see, People v Green,*54 NY2d 878). On this record, we decline to exercise our discretion either to reverse the conviction or to remand for resentencing. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — burglary, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 223 

Designating July 1, 2011, as ‘‘National Caretakers Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 30, 2011 

Ms. LANDRIEU submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 1, 2011, as ‘‘National Caretakers Day’’. 

Whereas caretakers provide necessary support to a variety of 

individuals, including children, the elderly, and the mentally or physically disabled; 

Whereas an estimated 80 percent of caretakers who work 

with adults provide assistance to those adults every day 

of the week; 

Whereas childcare providers offer a safe environment for the 

development of children that might not otherwise be 

available; 

Whereas individuals who received dependable childcare as 

children are more likely to have greater success in school, 

lower rates of juvenile crime, and a reduced risk of teen 

pregnancy; and 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 223 IS 

Whereas childcare providers enable the physical, emotional, 

intellectual, and spiritual growth of children: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 1, 2011, as ‘‘National Care3 takers Day’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes the contributions of caretakers to 

5 their communities in the United States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001000686
<NAME>                          North American Resorts, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                                  US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                      1
<CASH>                                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     0
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    2833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                0
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                    1471583
<COMMON>                                                        103294
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (1572044)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      2833
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     0
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     2266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (2266)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (2266)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 (491105)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (493371)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0.00



</TABLE>
# C_2016068EN.01000602.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège — Belgium) — Abdoulaye Amadou Tall v Centre public d’action sociale de Huy

(Case C-239/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2005/85/EC - Minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status - Article 39 - Right to an effective remedy - Multiple asylum claims - Non-suspensory effect of an appeal against a decision of the competent national authority not to further examine a subsequent application for asylum - Social protection - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 19(2) - Article 47))

(2016/C 068/08)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Abdoulaye Amadou Tall

Applicant:

Defendant: Centre public d’action sociale de Huy

Defendant:

Intervener: Agence fédérale pour l’accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil)

Intervener:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 39 of Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status, read in the light of Articles 19(2) and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which does not confer suspensory effect on an appeal brought against a decision, such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, not to further examine a subsequent application for asylum.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Metalline Mining Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      June 14, 2010
            By
            /s/
      Robert J. DeversRobert
      J. Devers, Chief Financial Officer
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 9 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Robert P. Kogod as a 

citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of Robert P. Kogod of the District of 

8 Columbia, is filled by reappointment of the incumbent for 

9 a term of 6 years, effective May 6, 2011. 

Passed the Senate March 15, 2011. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Mutch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that except for
the failure to timely file the report, the Quarterly Report of Peregrine Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Systems, Inc.

Date:
November 4, 2004

| |  | /s/JOHN MUTCHJohn Mutch
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Peregrine Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

LOUIS A. MURRAY

,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 20 2 4

- 0 200

May 1 , 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.1 41(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Michelle D. Sisco

, Judge.

Louis A. Murray, pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN

- YOUAKIM, and LABRIT

, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.