# C_2020019EN.01000701.xml

| 20.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/7

---

Appeal brought on 14 August 2019 by CC against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 June 2019 in Case T-248/17 RENV, CC v Parliament

(Case C-612/19 P)

(2020/C 19/09)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: CC (represented by: G. Maximini, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment delivered by the General Court on 13 June 2019 in Case T-248/17 RENV, with the exception of point 3 of the operative part of the judgment relating to costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment delivered by the General Court on 13 June 2019 in Case T-248/17 RENV, with the exception of point 3 of the operative part of the judgment relating to costs;

| — | order the Parliament to pay for all of the material and non-material damage suffered by the appellant, in accordance with the calculation method set out in the application initiating proceedings in Case F-9/12; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to pay for all of the material and non-material damage suffered by the appellant, in accordance with the calculation method set out in the application initiating proceedings in Case F-9/12;

| — | order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to pay the costs.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The appellant seeks to have set aside in part the judgment of 13 June 2019 in Case CC v Parliament, T-248/17 RENV (with the exception of point 3 of the operative part), in which the General Court ordered the Parliament to pay the appellant the sum of EUR 6 000 and all of the costs, with the remainder of the action being dismissed.

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on five grounds of appeal alleging:

| — | infringement of Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — breach of the principle of legal certainty — infringement of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — breach of the principle of legal certainty — infringement of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;

| — | errors of law in so far as the General Court failed to take the measures of inquiry and of organisation of the procedure requested; |
| --- | --- |

—

errors of law in so far as the General Court failed to take the measures of inquiry and of organisation of the procedure requested;

| — | distortion of the competition notice — failure to comply with the judgment ordering annulment — unlawful substitution of its own assessment — infringement of Article 1d(2) of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

distortion of the competition notice — failure to comply with the judgment ordering annulment — unlawful substitution of its own assessment — infringement of Article 1d(2) of the Staff Regulations;

| — | error of law in so far as the General Court excluded certain posts from its assessment of the loss of opportunity; |
| --- | --- |

—

error of law in so far as the General Court excluded certain posts from its assessment of the loss of opportunity;

| — | arbitrary assessment — error of law — failure to state reasons — lack of impartiality. |
| --- | --- |

—

arbitrary assessment — error of law — failure to state reasons — lack of impartiality.

---