40808 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 143 / Thursday, July 29, 2021 / Notices 

1See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019, 86 FR 6871 (January 25, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2Additional domestic parties include 

ArcelorMittal USA LLC, AK Steel Corporation, and 

Cleveland-Cliffs Steel LLC (collectively, domestic 

producers). 

3See POSCO’s Letter, ‘‘Cold Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from the Republic of Korea: POSCO’s Case 

Brief,’’ dated February 24, 2021; see also Hyundai’s 

Letter, ‘‘Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 

Republic of Korea: Hyundai Steel’s Case Brief,’’ 

dated February 24, 2021; U.S. Steel’s Letter, 

‘‘Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the 

Republic of Korea: Case Brief of United States Steel 

Corporation,’’ dated February 24, 2021; POSCO’s 

Letter, ‘‘Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products From the 

Republic of Korea: POSCO’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated 

March 5, 2021; Hyundai’s Letter, ‘‘Cold Rolled Steel 

Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Hyundai 

Steel’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated March 5, 2021; US 

Steel’s and Domestic Producers’ Letter, ‘‘ColdRolled Steel Flat Products From South Korea: 

Rebuttal Brief of United States Steel Corporation,’’ 

dated March 5, 2021; and U.S. Steel and Domestic 

Producers’ Letter, ‘‘Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products 

from Korea: Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief Concerning 

POSCO,’’ dated March 5, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Cold-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Extension 

of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated May 14, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018– 

2019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

location companies or were large singleestablishment companies. On an annual 

basis, the mail-out sample is 

supplemented with large, newly active 

single-establishment companies 

identified from a list provided by the 

Internal Revenue Service and new 

manufacturing establishments of multilocation companies identified from the 

Census Bureau’s Company Organization 

Survey. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0963. 

Electronic Path ID: MP–10002. 

Type of Review: Regular submission, 

Request for a Reinstatement, with 

Change, of a Previously Approved 

Collection. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

50,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: 45 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 37,500. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. (This is not the cost of 

respondents’ time, but the indirect costs 

respondents may incur for such things 

as purchases of specialized software or 

hardware needed to report, or 

expenditures for accounting or records 

maintenance services required 

specifically by the collection.) 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13, United 

States Code, Sections 131 and 182; 

Sections 224 and 225 make reporting for 

this survey mandatory. 

IV. Request for Comments 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department/Bureau to: (a) 

Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department, 

including whether the information will 

have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the 

accuracy of our estimate of the time and 

cost burden for this proposed collection, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (d) Minimize the 

reporting burden on those who are to 

respond, including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. We will include, or 

summarize, each comment in our 

request to OMB to approve this ICR. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you may ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Commerce 

Department. 

[FR Doc. 2021–16151 Filed 7–28–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–881] 

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From the Republic of Korea: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that certain 

cold-rolled steel flat products (coldrolled steel) from the Republic of Korea 

were not sold in the United States at 

prices below normal value during the 

period of review (POR), September 1, 

2018, through August 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable July 29, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney, George McMahon, or 

Marc Castillo, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475, 

(202) 482–1167, or (202) 482–5019, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 25, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. Between February 

24, and March 5, 2021, Commerce 

received timely filed case briefs and 

rebuttal briefs from United States Steel 

Corporation (U.S. Steel), additional 

domestic parties,2 Hyundai Steel 

Company (Hyundai), and POSCO/ 

POSCO International Corporation 

(POSCO).3 On May 14, 2021, we 

extended the deadline for issuing the 

final results until July 23, 2021.4

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, dated concurrently with 

these final results and hereby adopted 

by this notice.5 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

This review covers three producers 

and exporters of the subject 

merchandise. Based on an analysis of 

the comments received, we made 

certain changes to the margin 

calculations. The weighted-average 

dumping margins are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of the Review’’ section of 

this notice. Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 143 / Thursday, July 29, 2021 / Notices 40809 

6See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Brazil, India, the Republic of Korea, and the United 

Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping 

Determinations for Brazil and the United Kingdom 

and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 64432 

(September 20, 2016) (Order). 

7See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also 

Memorandum, ‘‘Final Determination Calculations 

for Hyundai,’’ dated concurrently with this notice; 

and Memorandum, ‘‘Final Determination 

Calculations for POSCO/PIC,’’ dated concurrently 

with this notice. 

8See Statement of Administrative Action 

Accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements 

Act, H.R. Doc. 103–316, vol. 1 (1994) at 873 (1994) 

(SAA). 

9See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 

1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). 

10Commerce has collapsed POSCO and POSCO 

International Corporation (PIC), treating these 

companies as a single entity. Commerce also finds 

that PIC is the successor-in-interest to POSCO 

Daewoo Corporation (PDW), and, as a consequence, 

is part of the collapsed POSCO single entity. See 

Memorandum, ‘‘Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

from the Republic of Korea: POSCO and POSCO 

International Corporation Affiliation and Collapsing 

Memorandum,’’ dated January 15, 2021 at 9–10. 

11Commerce determined that KG Dongbu Steel 

Co., Ltd. (KG Dongbu Steel) is the successor-ininterest to Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (Dongbu Steel) 

and Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. (Dongbu 

Incheon) for purposes of determining antidumping 

duty (AD) cash deposits and liabilities pursuant to 

the AD orders on certain cold-rolled steel and 

certain corrosion resistant steel products from 

Korea. See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 

Changed Circumstance Reviews, 86 FR 287 (January 

5, 2021), unchanged in Certain Cold-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results 

of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed 

Circumstances Reviews, 86 FR 10922 (February 23, 

2021). 

12See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 

6, 2003). 

13See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

14See Notice of Discontinuation Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order 6 is 

cold-rolled steel from the Republic of 

Korea. For a complete description of the 

scope of the Order, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All arguments raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in the appendix 

to this notice and addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made certain 

changes to the margin calculations for 

Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) and 

POSCO/POSCO International 

Corporation (POSCO). For a discussion 

of these changes, see the ‘‘Margin 

Calculations’’ section of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.7

Rate for Non-Examined Company 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

rate to be applied to companies not 

selected for individual examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ Section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act also provides 

that, where all rates for individually 

examined companies are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available, Commerce may use ‘‘any 

reasonable method’’ for assigning the 

rate to all other respondents. The SAA 

states that one such reasonable method 

is to weight-average the rates that are 

zero, de minimis, and based entirely on 

facts available.8

For these final results, we calculated 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

Hyundai and POSCO that are zero 

percent, and we have assigned this zero 

percent rate to the company not 

individually examined in this review 

(i.e., KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd) pursuant 

to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.9

Final Results of Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period September 

1, 2018, through August 31, 2019: 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hyundai Steel Company ............. 0.00 

POSCO/POSCO International 

Corporation 10 .......................... 0.00 

KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd 11 ...... 0.00 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, to parties in this proceeding, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where the respondent did not report 

entered value, we calculated the entered 

value in order to calculate the 

assessment rate. Where the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis within the meaning 

of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importerspecific rate is zero or de minimis, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. In accordance with 

Commerce’s practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR for 

which the reviewed companies did not 

know that the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the all-others rate if there is no 

company-specific rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.12

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.13

Consistent with its recent notice,14

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be zero; (2) 

for previously investigated companies 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
40810 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 143 / Thursday, July 29, 2021 / Notices 

15See Order. 

not participating in this review, the cash 

deposit will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recent 

segment for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 20.33 

percent,15 the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

this notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 23, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Rate for Non-Examined Company 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1–A: Lawfulness of Commerce’s 

Interpretation of the Particular Market 

Situation (PMS) Provision 

Comment 1–B: Evidence of a PMS 

Comment 1–C: Quantification of PMS 

Adjustment 

Comment 2: Constructed Export Price 

(CEP) Offset for POSCO 

Comment 3: Correction of Calculation 

Errors 

Comment 4: Whether Hyundai’s Cost 

Accounting Merits Adverse Facts 

Available (AFA) 

Comment 5: Assignment of an Assessment 

Rate to a Certain U.S. Affiliate 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–16172 Filed 7–28–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

[Docket Number: [210726–0151]] 

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management 

Framework 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Request for information. 

SUMMARY: The National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST) is 

developing a framework that can be 

used to improve the management of 

risks to individuals, organizations, and 

society associated with artificial 

intelligence (AI). The NIST Artificial 

Intelligence Risk Management 

Framework (AI RMF or Framework) is 

intended for voluntary use and to 

improve the ability to incorporate 

trustworthiness considerations into the 

design, development, and use, and 

evaluation of AI products, services, and 

systems. This notice requests 

information to help inform, refine, and 

guide the development of the AI RMF. 

The Framework will be developed 

through a consensus-driven, open, and 

collaborative process that will include 

public workshops and other 

opportunities for stakeholders to 

provide input. 

DATES: Comments in response to this 

notice must be received by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern time on August 19, 2021. 

Written comments in response to the 

RFI should be submitted according to 

the instructions in the ADDRESSES and 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION sections 

below. Submissions received after that 

date may not be considered. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted by any of the following 

methods: 

• Electronic submission: Submit 

electronic public comments via the 

Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. 

1. Go to www.regulations.gov and 

enter NIST–2021–0004 in the search 

field, 

2. Click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, 

complete the required fields, and 

3. Enter or attach your comments. 

• Email: Comments in electronic form 

may also be sent to AIframework@

nist.gov in any of the following formats: 

HTML; ASCII; Word; RTF; or PDF. 

Please submit comments only and 

include your name, organization’s name 

(if any), and cite ‘‘AI Risk Management 

Framework’’ in all correspondence. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions about this RFI contact: Mark 

Przybocki (mark.przybocki@nist.gov), 

U.S. National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, MS 20899, 100 Bureau 

Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, 

telephone (301) 975–3347, email 

AIframework@nist.gov. 

Direct media inquiries to NIST’s 

Office of Public Affairs at (301) 975– 

2762. Users of telecommunication 

devices for the deaf, or a text telephone, 

may call the Federal Relay Service, toll 

free at 1–800–877–8339. 

Accessible Format: On request to the 

contact person listed above, NIST will 

make the RFI available in alternate 

formats, such as Braille or large print, 

upon request by persons with 

disabilities. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Genesis for Development of the AI Risk 

Management Framework 

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly 

transforming our world. 

Surges in AI capabilities have led to 

a wide range of innovations. These new 

AI-enabled systems are benefitting many 

parts of society and economy from 

commerce and healthcare to 

transportation and cybersecurity. At the 

same time, new AI-based technologies, 

products, and services bring technical 

and societal challenges and risks, 

including ensuring that AI comports 

with ethical values. While there is no 

objective standard for ethical values, as 

they are grounded in the norms and 

legal expectations of specific societies or 

cultures, it is widely agreed that AI 

must be designed, developed, used, and 

evaluated in a trustworthy and 

responsible manner to foster public 

confidence and trust. Trust is 

established by ensuring that AI systems 

are cognizant of and are built to align 

with core values in society, and in ways 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES