alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 28 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 28

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for an event to award the Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to 
  the 100th Infantry Battalion, 442nd Regimental Combat Team, and the 
 Military Intelligence Service, United States Army, in recognition of 
              their dedicated service during World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2011

    Mr. Inouye (for himself and Mrs. Boxer) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for an event to award the Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to 
  the 100th Infantry Battalion, 442nd Regimental Combat Team, and the 
 Military Intelligence Service, United States Army, in recognition of 
              their dedicated service during World War II.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO AWARD THE 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on November 2, 2011, to award the 
Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the 100th Infantry 
Battalion, 442nd Regimental Combat Team, and the Military Intelligence 
Service, United States Army, in recognition of their dedicated service 
during World War II.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7396

WAYNE RESPER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES; NURSE BRENDA REECE; NURSE 

BEVERLY MCLAUGHLIN; NURSE CARLA BUCK; ALAN WILT; DIANE 

HENSEL; BERNICE; RYAN BROWNING; RICHARD GRAHAM, JR., Warden,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:17-cv-02014-PJM)

Submitted: April 18, 2019 Decided: April 22, 2019

Before AGEE, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Resper, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Conrad Meister, Gina Marie Smith, 

MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale Park, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Resper seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to 

compel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Resper seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      STATE OF
                                                                 PERCENTAGE         INCORPORATION
                                                                     OF                  OR
           PERCENT                        SUBSIDIARY              OWNERSHIP         ORGANIZATION
-------------------------------   ----------------------------   ------------       --------------
<S>                               <C>                            <C>                <C>
ITLA Capital Corporation          Imperial Capital Bank             100%               California

ITLA Capital Corporation          ITLA Funding Corporation          100%                 Delaware

ITLA Funding Corporation          ITLA Servicing Corporation        100%                 Delaware

ITLA Funding Corporation          ITLA Commercial Warehouse         100%                 Delaware
                                     Corporation

ITLA Capital Corporation          ITLA Management Corporation       100%                 Delaware

ITLA Management Corporation       ITLA Commercial Investment        100%                 Maryland
                                     Corporation

ITLA Capital Corporation          Imperial Capital Real             100%                 Delaware
                                     Estate Investment Trust

Imperial Capital Real Estate      ICCMAC Multifamily and            100%                 Delaware
   Investment Trust                  Commercial Trust 1999-I

ITLA Capital Corporation          ITLA Capital Statutory            100%       (1)    Connecticut
                                     Trust I
ITLA Capital Corporation          ITLA Capital Statutory            100%       (1)    Connecticut
                                     Trust II
ITLA Capital Corporation          ITLA Capital Statutory            100%       (1)       Delaware
                                     Trust III
ITLA Capital Corporation          ITLA Capital Statutory            100%       (1)       Delaware
                                     Trust IV
ITLA Capital Corporation          ITLA Capital Statutory            100%       (1)    Connecticut
                                     Trust V
</TABLE>

----------

(1)  Represents ownership of the common securities of the trust.
#### Anthony “Peppi” Marchello, Respondent, v Perfect Little Productions, Inc., et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[941 NYS2d 846]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of bailment and negligence, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered June 15, 2010, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the causes of action to recover damages for breach of bailment and negligence.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and those branches of the plaintiff s motion which were for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the causes of action to recover damages for breach of bailment and negligence are denied.

The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of bailment and negligence, alleging, among other things, that the defendants negligently failed to preserve certain musical recordings which they were storing on computer hard drives. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the causes of action to recover damages for breach of bailment and negligence.

In support of his motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff established, prima facie, that the defendants were negligent in failing to preserve his musical recordings and committed a breach of a gratuitous bailment *(see Voorhis v Consolidated Rail*
      *826
      *Corp.,*60 NY2d 878, 879 [1983]; *Ramirez v City of White Plains,*35 AD3d 698 [2006]). However, in opposition, the defendants raised triable issues of fact as to, among other things, whether the bailment in question was gratuitous or for hire, and as to whether they were free from negligence. Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the causes of action to recover damages for breach of bailment and negligence.

We decline the defendants’ request to search the record and award summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Valerie Valente. Rivera, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Cohen, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 31536(U).]
##### 



Certification of the
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Valley National Gases
Incorporated;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
    /s/ James P. HartChief Financial Officer
 - 37 -
Case: 1:03-cr-00779 Document #: 116 Filed: 11/03/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:573
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of TB Woods Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statements of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the periods presented in this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant, as of, and for the
periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and we have:a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in the report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons
fulfilling the equivalent function):a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Joseph C. HorvathChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 66
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                          11,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                    185,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,568
<PP&E>                                         429,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                 221,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,374,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          962,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,906,304
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,501
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,483,349)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,374,209
<SALES>                                        272,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,065
<CGS>                                          199,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,964,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,948,761)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (57,816)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,948,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,948,761)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,467,929)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,467,929)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:17 a.m. on Tuesday, July 20, 2021.

PLACE: The meeting was held via video conference on the internet.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: In calling the meeting, the Board determined, 
on motion of Director Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director Michael 
J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), and concurred in by 
Director David Uejio (Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection 
Bureau), and Chairman Jelena McWilliams, that Corporation business 
required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject 
of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no 
earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest 
did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to 
public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' 
(5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Deputy 
Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

    Dated this the 20th day of July, 2021.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15729 Filed 7-20-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 234 

Relative to the death of William F. Hildenbrand, former Secretary of the 

Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2011 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of William F. Hildenbrand, former 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Whereas William F. Hildenbrand began his service to the 

United States Senate in 1961 as an assistant to Senator 

J. Caleb Boggs; 

Whereas William F. Hildenbrand served as Administrative 

Assistant to Senator Hugh Scott from 1969 until 1974; 

Whereas William F. Hildenbrand served as Secretary for the 

Minority of the Senate from 1974 until 1981; 

Whereas William F. Hildenbrand served as Secretary of the 

Senate from 1981 until 1985; 

Whereas William F. Hildenbrand served as an employee of 

the Senate of the United States and ably and faithfully 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 234 ATS 

upheld the high standards and traditions of the staff of 

the Senate from 1961 until 1985; 

Whereas William F. Hildenbrand discharged the difficult duties and responsibilities of a wide variety of important 

and demanding positions in public life with honesty, integrity, loyalty and humility; and 

Whereas William F. Hildenbrand’s clear understanding and 

appreciation of the challenges facing the Nation has left 

his mark on those many years of public life: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound 

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death 

3 of William F. Hildenbrand. 

4 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu5 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives 

6 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the 

7 deceased. 

8 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it 

9 stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem10 ory of William F. Hildenbrand. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Robert M. Rehbock, Doing Business as Taurus Realty Co., Respondent, v Robert Levine, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis I. Kaplan, J.), entered January 27, 1984, pursuant to which a judgment was entered April 16, 1984, which order granted, in part, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on his first and second causes of action and summary judgment as to liability only on the fifth cause of action subject to an assessment for attorney’s fees, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny summary judgment as to the second cause of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In this action to recover rent and other charges, not paid pursuant to a written apartment lease, Special Term properly found defendant liable for rent under the first cause of action, and for attorney’s fees pursuant to the fifth cause of action.

However, summary judgment was improperly granted as to the second cause of action to recover “late charge penalties assessed and noticed to the tenant.” The landlord documents his claim for late charges by a handwritten list purporting to show when the rent for each month was received during the years 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982, and assessing late charges on that basis. When or by whom the list was prepared, and upon what basis, does not appear. The late charges were apparently computed on the basis of 3% per month during the five-year term of the lease. Paragraph 38 of the lease provides for a “three percent (3%) monthly service charge in the event that the monthly rent payment is received after the tenth of any month.” Tenant denies he ever delayed payment for 10 days. There is no evidence that a demand was ever made during the five-year period that late charges or service charges be paid. Nor is there any evidence of any billing for such charges.

There is a triable issue as to the liability for such charges and how they were computed. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross and Fein, JJ.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of B-Teller, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Armando Russo,
      President and J. A. Claydon, Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      That
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





B-TELLER,
      INC.


By /s/
      Armando Russo


President


By
      /s/ J.
      A.
      Claydon


Secretary


July
      19,
      2006
#### DOLPHIN, Respondent, v. SWANSON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 19, 1907.)

Action by William M. Dolphin against Charles Swanson.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Premier Holding Corp.(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010,, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jasmine Gregory, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending  June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010,, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Date:  August 13, 2010 | Jasmine Gregory
Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------