alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                                       AND
                  ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with this Annual Report of Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet
Torm (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Klaus Kjaerulff, Chief Executive Officer and Acting
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 25, 2007


/s/ Klaus Kjaerulff
-------------------
    Klaus Kjaerulff
    Chief Executive Officer and
    Acting Chief Financial Officer
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 125 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Public Health Week. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 31, 2011 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. AKAKA, and Mr. BEGICH) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, 

Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Public Health 

Week. 

Whereas the week of April 4, 2011, through April 10, 2011, 

is National Public Health Week, and the theme for 2011 

is ‘‘Safety is No Accident: Live Injury-Free’’; 

Whereas since 1995, public health organizations have used 

National Public Health Week to educate the public, policymakers, and public health professionals about issues 

that are important to improving the health of the people 

of the United States; 

Whereas each year, nearly 150,000 people die from injuries 

and almost 30,000,000 people are injured seriously 

enough to require a visit to an emergency room; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 125 IS 

Whereas unintentional injuries, such as motor vehicle crashes, poisonings, and burns, rank among the top 10 causes 

of death for people ages 1 through 44; 

Whereas the financial costs of injuries are staggering, accounting for 12 percent of annual medical care spending 

and totaling as much as $69,000,000,000 per year; 

Whereas injuries, unexpected events, and violence affect people at home, at work, and at play, in their communities 

and on the move; and 

Whereas many injuries and associated costs can be prevented 

by taking actions such as wearing a seatbelt, properly installing smoke alarms, properly installing and using child 

safety seats, wearing a helmet, storing cleaning supplies 

(and guns) in locked cabinets, and educating the community about violence and abuse toward children, women, 

seniors, and other at-risk populations: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Public Health Week; 

4 (2) recognizes the efforts of public health pro5 fessionals, the Federal Government, States, munici6 palities, local communities, and every person in the 

7 United States in reducing injuries and promoting 

8 safety; 

9 (3) recognizes the role of public health in pro10 moting safety, preventing injury, and improving the 

11 health of people in the United States; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 125 IS 

1 (4) encourages increased efforts and resources 

2 to improve the health of people in the United States 

3 through— 

4 (A) the promotion of safety and reduction 

5 of injuries; and 

6 (B) the strengthening of the public health 

7 system of the United States; and 

8 (5) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to learn about the role of public health in improving 

10 health in the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# C_2020399EN.01003302.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Osório & Gonçalves v EUIPO — Miguel Torres (in.fi.ni.tu.de)

(Case T-601/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative EU trade mark in.fi.ni.tu.de - Earlier national word mark INFINITE - Admissibility of evidence - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 47(2) and (3) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2020/C 399/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Osório & Gonçalves, SA (Galamares, Portugal) (represented by: D. Araújo e Sá Serras Pereira, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2019 (Case R 1579/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Miguel Torres and Osório & Gonçalves.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Osório & Gonçalves, SA, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Osório & Gonçalves, SA, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.

---
#### Leslie YUENGAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-1250.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.

Leslie Yuengal, Appellant Pro Se. Es-kunder Boyd, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, Maryland; Rudolph A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leslie Yuengal appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of benefits under the Social Security Act. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 *&*Supp.2011). The magistrate judge recommended upholding the Commissioner’s decision and *169advised Yuengal that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Yuengal has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Yuengal’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
+e,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

Andre Lawrence,

No. 02 CR 200-22

Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Defendant.

ORDER

Motion hearing held on 511012019. Defendant's motion for relief under the First Step Act

[1865] is granted. Defendant's term of Supervised Release is reduced from ten to eight years

as to Count One. Defendant's terms of supervised release are further modified to require

residence at a BOP residential reentry center for the first 120 days of Defendant's term of

supervised release. AII of the other terms and conditions of the previous judgment remain

unchanged. Motions for reconsideration and to amend/correct [1855, 1862] are stricken as

moot.

ENTER:

Dated: May 10,2019

(T:00:03)

Case: 1:02-cr-00200 Document #: 1875 Filed: 05/10/19 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:7602
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bluefly, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Melissa Payner-Gregor,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                       /s/ Melissa Payner-Gregor
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Melissa Payner-Gregor
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

May 11, 2006
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Prakash Agarwal, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation.



Date: December 10, 2004



By:

/s/ Prakash AgarwalName:

Prakash AgarwalTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




33 of 34
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Dennard MCNEAIR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-6343.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 2, 2011.

Terry Dennard McNeair, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terry Dennard McNeair appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. McNeair,*No. 4:96-cr-00070-WO-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 275 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 275

  Designating October 30, 2011, as a national day of remembrance for 
                    nuclear weapons program workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2011

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. 
  Udall of New Mexico, Ms. Cantwell, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Graham, Mr. 
Crapo, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Corker, and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 26, 2011

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating October 30, 2011, as a national day of remembrance for 
                    nuclear weapons program workers.

Whereas, since World War II, hundreds of thousands of men and women, including 
        uranium miners, millers, and haulers, have served the United States by 
        building the nuclear defense weapons of the United States;
Whereas these dedicated workers paid a high price for their service to develop a 
        nuclear weapons program for the benefit of the United States, including 
        having developed disabling or fatal illnesses;
Whereas the Senate recognized the contribution, service, and sacrifice these 
        patriotic men and women made for the defense of the United States in 
        Senate Resolution 151, 111th Congress, agreed to May 20, 2009, and 
        Senate Resolution 653, 111th Congress, agreed to September 28, 2010;
Whereas a national day of remembrance time capsule has been crossing the United 
        States, collecting artifacts and the stories of the nuclear workers 
        relating to the nuclear defense era of the United States;
Whereas these stories and artifacts reinforce the importance of recognizing 
        these nuclear workers; and
Whereas these patriotic men and women deserve to be recognized for the 
        contribution, service, and sacrifice they have made for the defense of 
        the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 30, 2011, as a national day of 
        remembrance for nuclear weapons program workers, including 
        uranium miners, millers, and haulers, of the United States; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to support 
        and participate in appropriate ceremonies, programs, and other 
        activities to commemorate October 30, 2011, as a national day 
        of remembrance for past and present workers in the nuclear 
        weapons program of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Charles Sullivan, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[944 NYS2d 677]—

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

During a lengthy investigation, correction officers discovered that petitioner was using the inmate telephone system and correspondence to solicit his brother, his girlfriend and a facility cook to bring marihuana into the correctional facility for distri*1515bution. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with making three-way calls, possessing personal information of an employee, conspiring to possess drugs, smuggling and violating facility correspondence procedures. Petitioner pleaded guilty to making three-way calls and, following a tier III disciplinary hearing, was found guilty of all charges. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal with a modified penalty, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Initially, inasmuch as petitioner pleaded guilty to making three-way calls, he is precluded from challenging the determination with respect to this charge *(see Matter of Kae v Bezio,*79 AD3d 1496, 1497 [2010]; *Matter of Frazier v Prack,*62 AD3d 1185, 1185 [2009]). As for the remaining charges, the misbehavior report, testimony of the investigator who prepared it and the confidential testimony and documents considered by the Hearing Officer in camera provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt as to these charges *(see Matter of Boyle v Fischer,*89 AD3d 1268 [2011]; *Matter of Taylor v Fischer,*74 AD3d 1677, 1677 [2010]). Although petitioner denied any involvement in bringing drugs into the facility, as did the witnesses he called to testify upon his behalf, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Pedraza v Fischer,*65 AD3d 1434, 1435 [2009]; *Matter of Rivera v Goord,*3 AD3d 634, 635 [2004]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or are lacking in merit.

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6525

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARYL WENDELL BARLEY, a/k/a Black,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior 

District Judge. (4:10-cr-00010-JLK-RSB-1; 4:12-cv-80417-JLKRSB)

Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 26, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daryl Wendell Barley, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daryl Wendell Barley seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Barley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick E. Peters, Appellant.

Harvey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Siedlecki, J.), rendered August 31,1983, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of escape in the second degree.

As a result of a plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to the first count of a two-count indictment with the understanding that he would be sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate prison term of *IV2*to 3 years.

The only issue raised on this appeal is defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of the second felony offender provision contained in Penal Law § 70.06. Although we note that defendant did not preserve this issue on the record, we do address ourselves to the contentions raised on this appeal. These same contentions have been before this court on numerous occasions and we have repeatedly upheld the constitutionality of the second felony offender statute *(People v Sibley,*54 AD2d 772; *People v Galpin,*49 AD2d 654; *People v Brown,*46 AD2d 255).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
# C_2019363EN.01003001.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/30

---

Action brought on 4 September 2019 – Inova Semiconductors v EUIPO – Venta Servicio LED (ISELED)

(Case T-604/19)

(2019/C 363/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Inova Semiconductors GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmidpeter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Venta Servicio LED, SL (Martorell, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark ISELED in the colours black, red, orange, yellow, green and blue – International registration designating the European Union No 1 343 583

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 June 2019 in Case R 2149/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the plaintiff for the purposes of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the plaintiff for the purposes of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of essential procedural requirements in Article 75(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of essential procedural requirements in Article 75(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 11 ,

2013

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00510

- CV

AMERICAN REALTY ASSO CIATES, LLC , Appellant

V.

EDGAR RODRIGUEZ AND SARA ANN RODRIGUEZ , Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 31285

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 7, 2013 . On July 8, 2013, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The

motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Donovan.