alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 46 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 46

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rules submitted by the Department of the 
  Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service relating to the reporting 
requirements for interest that relates to deposits maintained at United 
States offices of certain financial institutions and is paid to certain 
                     nonresident alien individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2012

   Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
DeMint, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Lee, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. 
    Paul, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Thune) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rules submitted by the Department of the 
  Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service relating to the reporting 
requirements for interest that relates to deposits maintained at United 
States offices of certain financial institutions and is paid to certain 
                     nonresident alien individuals.

Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
the rules submitted by the Department of the Treasury and the Internal 
Revenue Service relating to the reporting requirements for interest 
that relates to deposits maintained at United States offices of certain 
financial institutions and is paid to certain nonresident alien 
individuals (published at 77 Fed. Reg. 23391 (April 19, 2012)), and 
that such rules shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 13, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41391

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS GRIJALBA-CELIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-701-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Grijalba-Celis (Grijalba) appeals his conviction and

the sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to illegal

reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Grijalba argues that

the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions in 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in the light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Grijalba

concedes, this argument is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998); United States v.
No. 04-41391

-2-

Izaguirre-Flores, 405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 253 (2005). 

Grijalba also argues, for the first time on appeal, that the

district court erred by imposing a sentence pursuant to the

mandatory Sentencing Guidelines system held unconstitutional in

United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Because the

district court erred in sentencing Grijalba pursuant to a

mandatory Guidelines scheme, he meets the first two requirements

for relief under plain error review. See United States v. Olano,

507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993); United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,

407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 267

(2005). The Government concedes that Grijalba can satisfy the

third prong of plain error by showing that the district court

felt constrained by the Sentencing Guidelines and most likely

would have imposed a lower sentence under an advisory Guidelines

scheme. We find nothing in the record that disturbs the

Government’s representation. 

Accordingly, Grijalba’s conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is

AFFIRMED; his sentence, however, is VACATED, and the case is

REMANDED for further proceedings.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Ching Lung Po, Chief Executive Officer of OVM
International Holding Corp. (the "Company") has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Report").

         The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the 12th day of August, 2002.


                                            /s/
                                            ----------------------------




                                            Name: Ching Lung Po
                                                  -----------------------------
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                   ----------------------------
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 8 

Recognizing women serving in the United States Armed Forces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2011 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mr. BURR, Mrs. HAGAN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. 

SANDERS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. BENNET, and Mr. LAUTENBERG) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing women serving in the United States Armed 

Forces. 

Whereas women have served with distinction in the United 

States Armed Forces since the American Revolution and 

have made significant and lasting contributions to the security of the United States; 

Whereas in 2011, women comprise nearly 16 percent of the 

United States Armed Forces and serve in positions of responsibility in the active and reserve components of the 

Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard, 

as compared with less than 5 percent in 1976 when 

women were first integrated into the service academies; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 8 ATS 

Whereas women serve at the highest levels in the Department 

of Defense and other governmental organizations contributing to the defense of the United States; and 

Whereas the accomplishments of generations of women have 

contributed to the history of the United States Armed 

Forces and to the strength of the United States: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the importance of women to na4 tional defense throughout the history of the United 

5 States; and 

6 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to honor women who have served and who continue 

8 to serve the United States in the United States 

9 Armed Forces. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

June 9, 1939 

Eonornble Foster Davis 

County Attorney 

Foard County 

Crotall, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

YOU have r0QUe8 

tiOn8 which you have 8ubm 

t0 t3118Wer tW0 qU08- 

urt et any t&8 

der making such 

ta1y ettectlve? 

t1 

Do 

2 

ad 

th 8n8wared In the afiirmain tie ca.88 of Stabe 61 rel. 

Your8 wry truly 

ATTOR?iiY GEiiiW.hL OF TEXAS 

Bi23:FL 

Bruce 7:. Bryant 

A88i8tfUlt 

A~'FliOVED
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Bluefly, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March
31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Kara B. Jenny, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kara B. JennyKara
      B. JennyChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      4, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6267

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

YUESEYUAN CRUEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 24-6268

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

YUESEYUAN CRUEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 24-6269

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6269 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

v.

YUESEYUAN CRUEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:99-cr-00625-HMH-3; 6:02-

cr-00858-HMH-1; 6:08-cr-00797-JMC-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2024 Decided: May 24, 2024

Before WYNN and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yueseyuan Cruel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6269 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Yueseyuan Cruel appeals the district court’s text orders denying his motions for 

destruction of records and a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and discern 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6269 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15900]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 27, 2021 / 
Notices

[[Page 40190]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Correction

AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, Department of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service, Department of Agriculture, 
published a document in the Federal Register of July 16, 2021, 
concerning request for comments on specifications for the Direct Single 
Family Housing Loan and Grant Program. The document contained an 
incorrect number of respondents and total burden hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of July 16, 2021, in FR Doc 2021-15117, on 
page 37732, in the second column, correct the Number of Respondents: to 
read 248,919 and correct the Total Burden Hours: to read 305,646.

Levi S. Harrell,
Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-15900 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Metalline Mining Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      June 14, 2010
            By
            /s/ Merlin
      BinghamMerlin
      Bingham, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott Sullinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation.



Date: December 10, 2004



By:

/s/ Scott SullingerName:

Scott SullingerTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




34 of 34
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17
March 7, 1998

Ronald A. Rittenmeyer

Ryder TRS, Inc.

1560 Broadway, Suite 1800

Denver, Colorado 80202

Re:  Employment Agreement

Dear Ron:

I have been advised that certain provisions of my employment agreement with the
Company dated December 18, 1997 may give rise to so-called "parachute payments"
under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.

While my rights under my employment agreement are fully enforceable by me, I
hereby agree to waive all right and entitlement to the "Executive Severance" and
"Executive Stay-on Bonus" (collectively, the "Parachute Payments") to be
provided to me by the Company under the terms of my employment agreement.

My waiver of the Parachute Payments is subject to and conditioned on the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated as of March 4, 1998 by and among Ryder TRS, Inc., Questor Partners
Fund, L.P., Questor Side-By-Side Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital
Partners, L.P., BDG Corporation and Budget Group, Inc. (the "Merger Agreement").
If the Merger Agreement is terminated prior to the "Closing" (as defined in the
Merger Agreement) as provided in Section 10.1 of the Merger Agreement, my waiver
of the Parachute Payments shall be deemed rescinded, and the existing terms of
my employment agreement will continue to apply without regard to this waiver.
Except as otherwise provided herein, my waiver of the Parachute Payments shall
not affect any other benefits provided under my employment agreement.

Please acknowledge receipt and your agreement to the matters set forth in this
letter.

Very truly yours,

/s/ STEPHEN DIXON 

Stephen Dixon


Accepted and Agreed to:

RYDER TRS, INC.

/s/ RONALD A. RITTENMEYER
____________________________
Ronald A. Rittenmeyer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the Quarterly   Report on Form  10-Q  of Synovics
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the for the quarterly  period ended
July 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),
I, Ronald Howard Lane,  Principal  Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the
     dates presented and  consolidated  results of operations of the Company for
     the periods presented.

Dated: September 18, 2006


By: /s/ Ronald Howard Lane
    ------------------------
    Ronald Howard Lane
    Chief Executive Officer



This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Synovics  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  and will be retained by Synovics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-92331; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2021-042]

                    On May 28, 2021, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          a proposed rule change to introduce a new data product to be known as Short Sale Volume data.                

                    The proposed rule change was published for comment in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 16, 2021.[3]                                          On June 30, 2021, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-CboeBZX-2021-042).                

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[4] 

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,

Assistant Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92148 (June 10, 2021), 86 FR 32088. Comment on the proposed rule change is located at:                         *https://www.sec.gov/​comments/​sr-cboebzx-2021-042/​srcboebzx2021042.htm.*
        Back to Citation      

4.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-14695 Filed 7-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Raymond L. Lawless,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 13, 2007 |  | /s/ RAYMOND L. LAWLESS 
|                      |  | Raymond L. Lawless     
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
# C_2019270EN.01003902.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/39

---

Action brought on 21 June 2019 — Topcart v EUIPO — Carl International (TC CARL)

(Case T-377/19)

(2019/C 270/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Topcart GmbH (Wiesbaden, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carl International (Limonest, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark TC CARL — Application No 14 957 542

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2019 in Case R 1826/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---