alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



                    Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
               (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based
upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



By: /s/ Hua Meng
 ---------------------------------
Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer

April 12, 2006


 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Dahua Inc. and will be retained by Dahua Inc. and furnished to the
Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
    connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Synovics Pharmaceuticals,
    Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2009 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gerald Price
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(3) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                       
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(4) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
 presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the
 periods presented.

|                          |                                 
|------------------------- | --------------------------------
|Dated: September 21, 2009
|                         
|By:                       | /s/ Gerald Price                
|                          |                                 
|                          | Gerald Price                    
|                          | Interim
 Chief Executive Officer

This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synovics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Synovics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
<PAGE>


                                                               EXHIBIT 10.14





BANK:          NORTH FORK BANK

BORROWER:      TECHNOLOGY FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES, INC.

IN ADDITION TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN THE DEFAULT SECTION OF
THE CONSOLIDATED, MODIFIED REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE, DATED OCTOBER 22, 1996,
THE BANK AND THE BORROWER FURTHER AGREE, IN CONSIDERATION FOR THE WAIVERS AND
MODIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE BANK TO THE BORROWER OF SAID AGREEMENT, THAT
THE BANK MAY DECLARE THE ENTIRE UNPAID BALANCE OF THE NOTE DUE AND PAYABLE ON
THE HAPPENING OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING EVENTS (EACH AN "EVENT OF DEFAULT"):

(m)   If loans/advances made to shareholders exceed $20,000 on
      December 31, 1997.

(n)   That the Borower has not converted $1,500,000 of Convertible 
      Subordinated Notes issued on October 17, 1996 into common
      stock on or prior to October 16, 1997.

(o)   That the Borrower has made prior to March 31, 1998 any loan 
      payments, other than the 1996 accrued interest, to Richard
      Higgins under that Certain Promissory Note dated
      December 6, 1995, as Amended and restated June 3, 1996,
      in the outstanding principal amount of $888,019.

(p)   If the Borrower fails to provide the Bank with 30 days written
      notice of its intention to make any loan payment to
      Richard Higgins, other than payments of 1996 accured interest,
      and provide along with said written notice proforma financial
      statements reflecting the impact of said payment on the
      Borrower's financial condition.


AGREED TO THIS 9th DAY OF APRIL, 1997.

TECHNOLOGY FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES, INC.


By:    /s/ Philip Rosner
      -------------------------------------
      Philip Rosner, President



By:    /s/ Joseph Gemmo
      -------------------------------------
      Joseph Gemmo, Vice President
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-92725 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1985 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the
1993 Employee Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, the 1993 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan and the
Employee Gift Program, and No. 333-130791 on Form S-8 pertaining to the
Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. 2005 Restricted Stock Grant Plan, of our report
dated February 27, 2007 on the consolidated financial statements of Kentucky
Bancshares, Inc., which report is included in Form 10-K for Kentucky
Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006


/s/Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Lexington, Kentucky
March 30, 2007

98
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 25, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Christie Digital Systems, Phoenix, AZ; Cobalt Digital Inc., Champaign, IL; and Pedro Ferreira (individual member), Lavra, PORTUGAL, have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, Beijing Gefei Tech Co., Ltd., Beijing, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 24, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 8, 2021 (86 FR 18299).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2021-15821 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                          4,608
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   10,101
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     13,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                29,798
<PP&E>                          20,337
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  50,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           19,959
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        13
<OTHER-SE>                      26,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    50,135
<SALES>                         16,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                16,482
<CGS>                           12,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   12,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,354
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2,276
<INCOME-TAX>                    413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1,863
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .15
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 2 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 2

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for an event marking 
  the 50th anniversary of the inaugural address of President John F. 
                                Kennedy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 5, 2011

  Mr. Kerry submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for an event marking 
  the 50th anniversary of the inaugural address of President John F. 
                                Kennedy.

Whereas John Fitzgerald Kennedy was elected to the United States House of 
        Representatives and served from January 3, 1947, to January 3, 1953, 
        until he was elected by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to the Senate 
        where he served from January 3, 1953, to December 22, 1960;
Whereas on November 8, 1960, John Fitzgerald Kennedy was elected as the 35th 
        President of the United States; and
Whereas on January 20, 1961, President Kennedy was sworn in as President of the 
        United States and delivered his inaugural address at 12:51pm, a speech 
        that served as a clarion call to service for the Nation: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR AN EVENT HONORING 
              PRESIDENT KENNEDY.

    The rotunda of the United States Capitol is authorized to be used 
on January 20, 2011, for a ceremony in honor of the 50th anniversary of 
the inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy. Physical 
preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
The Company has entered into a five-year  employment agreement with Mr.
Copland. The agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation  provisions
for a 12-month period following termination of employment. The Company maintains
key man life insurance on Mr.  Copland in the amount of $1,000,000.  The Company
has  assigned  one-half  of the  proceeds  of this  policy to the  estate of the
insured.  The  Company's  success  also is dependent on its ability to identify,
recruit,  and  retain  additional  experienced  management,   engineering,   and
marketing personnel.  There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
hire or retain  necessary  personnel.  The failure of the Company to attract and
retain personnel with the requisite expertise or to internally develop personnel
with such  expertise  could  adversely  affect the  prospects  of the  Company's
success.  See "Directors and Executive  Officers of the  Registrant;  Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934"  contained in Item 9
of this Report and "Executive Compensation - Employment Agreements" contained in
Item 10 of this Report.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1
                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

         (1)      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
                  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated: November 5, 2004
       ----------------

                                              /s/ John R. Hickey
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:  John R. Hickey
                                              Title: President and Chief
                                                     Executive Officer


THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY
FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
# C_2020371EN.01001501.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/15

---

Order of the General Court of 2 September 2020 — DTE Systems v EUIPO Speed-Buster (PedalBox +)

(Case T-801/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark PedalBox + - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Misuse of rights - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly unfounded in law)

(2020/C 371/16)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: DTE Systems GmbH (Recklinghausen, Germany) (represented by: U. Vietmeyer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Speed-Buster GmbH & Co. KG (Sinzig, Germany) (represented by: C. Gries, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2019 (Case R 1934/2018-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Speed-Buster and DTE Systems.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | DTE Systems GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

DTE Systems GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

---
# C_2019213EN.01005201.xml

| 24.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/52

---

Action brought on 9 April 2019 — Infineon Technologies Dresden v Commission

(Case T-233/19)

(2019/C 213/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG (Dresden, Germany) (represented by: L. Assmann and M. Peiffer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision, notified under document C(2018) 3166 (OJ 2019 L 14, p. 1), of 28 May 2018 on aid scheme SA.34045 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 of the Stromnetzentgeltverordnung (Regulation on electricity network charges, ‘the StromNEV’); and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision, notified under document C(2018) 3166 (OJ 2019 L 14, p. 1), of 28 May 2018 on aid scheme SA.34045 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 of the Stromnetzentgeltverordnung (Regulation on electricity network charges, ‘the StromNEV’); and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The application is based on one plea in law, arguing that the contested decision is unlawful because the exemption from the network charges under the second sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV is not State aid within the meaning of Article 107 et seq. TFEU.

In this regard, the applicant first argues that the exemption from network charges granted on the basis of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV was not granted through State resources within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU but was financed through German electricity grid operators which are organised under private law and are not attributable to the State. Neither does the effect of the disputed surcharge equate to a levy on electricity consumption in Germany. In addition, the Federal Republic of Germany has no control over the transmission system operators which are entrusted with the management of these resources.

It is further claimed that the exemption from network charges on the basis of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV differs in significant aspects from the underlying circumstances in Cases C-206/06, Essent Netwerk Noord and Others and C-262/12, Vent De Colère!. The disputed case is comparable, however, with the surcharge in Case C-405/16 P, Germany v Commission, and therefore not classifiable as aid.

---
# C_2020061EN.01004601.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/46

---

Order of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Jalkh v Parliament

(Case T-360/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - European Parliament legislative resolution - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 61/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-François Jalkh (Gretz-Armainvilliers, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z. Nagy and S. Lucente, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the European Parliament’s legislative resolution of 16 April 2019 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) as regards cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of OLAF investigations (COM(2018)0338 C8-0214/2018 2018J0170(COD).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Jean-François Jalkh shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Jean-François Jalkh shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Jones, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cooperman, J.), rendered July 15, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant seeks reversal of the instant judgment solely in the event we were to reverse a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murray, J.), rendered January 11, 1982. Defendant contends that a reversal of the foregoing, unrelated judgment would warrant a reversal of the instant judgment because the plea herein “[w]as taken in reliance on the prior conviction”. In light of our disposition of the appeal from the prior judgment *(People v Jones,*111 AD2d 264 [No. 44]), there is concededly no basis for a reversal of the judgment herein *(see, People v Landy,*59 NY2d 369). In any event, defendant’s contention is without merit *(see, People v Lowrence,*41 NY2d 303). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#### MONTGOMERY IRON WORKS, ET AL. V. CAPITAL CITY INS. CO.

*Garnishment.*

(Decided July 2, 1907.)

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. A. D. Sayre.

Horace Strtngeellow, and Wilson & Martin, for appellant

*664Gunter & Gunter, for appellee.

Simpson, J.

Reversed and remanded on authority of *Montgomery Iron Works v. Roman,*147 Ala. 434; 41 South. 811.

Haralson, Dowdell, Anderson, Denson and McClellan, JJ., concur. Tyson, C. J., not sitting.