alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Bryan M. Lemley, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 10, 2006 

 

/s/ Bryan M. Lemley
Bryan M. Lemley,Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Hiers, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 512]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the *777ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 7, 2009 *(People v Hiers,*64 AD3d 616 [2009]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 17, 2006.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, A.P.J., Dillon, Florio and Belen, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard
Root, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Howard Root
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Howard Root
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                                  April 30, 2003




                                       1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Modern MFG Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Terry Burke, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/   Terry Burke
------------------------
Terry Burke
Chief Financial Officer

March 7, 2003
# C_2023252EN.01008102.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/81

---

Order of the General Court of 26 May 2023 — Yalwen v Commission

(Case T-759/19) (1)

(2023/C 252/99)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Beckford, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.), rendered July 14, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Although certain inconsistencies appear in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, the resolution of issues of credibility and the weight of the evidence presented is properly for the trier of fact *(see, People v Rosenfeld,*93 AD2d 872). After examining the record, we have concluded that the People satisfied their burden of proving defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. While some of the prosecutor’s remarks during his summation may have been improper, they do not *675warrant reversal under the circumstances and defendant was not deprived of a fair trial *(see, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396, 401).

We have considered the remainder of defendant’s contentions and have found them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.3


The Depository Trust Company 

A subsidiary of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation



BLANKET ISSUER LETTER OF REPRESENTATIONS 


ETFS PLATINUM TRUST


June 25, 2009

(Date)


Attention: Underwriting Department

The Depository Trust Company 

55 Water Street, 1SL 

New York, NY 10041-0099 



Ladies and Gentlemen: 


          This letter sets forth our understanding with respect to all issues (the “Securities”) that Issuer shall request to be made eligible for deposit by the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). 


Issuer is formed under the laws of the State of New York. 


          To induce DTC to accept the Securities as eligible for deposit at DTC, and to act in accordance with DTC’s Rules with respect to the Securities, Issuer represents to DTC that issuer will comply with the requirements stated
in DTC’s Operational Arrangements, as they may be amended from time to time. 

	
Note:    	    	
      Very truly yours,    
	
Schedule A contains statements that DTC believes    	    	 	   
	
accurate describe DTC, the method of effecting      	    	
      ETFS PLATINUM TRUST,    
	
book-entry transfers of securities distributed      	    	 	   
	
through DTC, and certain related matters.   	    	
      by ETF Securities USA LLC, as sponsor        
	     
	
Received and Accepted      	    	By:	/s/
            Greg Burgess
	
THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY        	    	 	
(Authorized Officer’s Signature”) 
	     
	
By:        	/s/ The Depository Trust Company	    	 	Greg
        Burgess 
	       	 	 	 	(Print Name)
	 	 	 	 	 
	         	    	 	Ordnance
            House, 31 Pier Road, St. Helier JE48 PW
	       	 	 	 	(Street Address)
	 	 	 	 	 
	         	    	 	Jersey,
            Channel Islands
	                                   	 	 	(City, State, Country, Zip)
	 	 	 
	    	 	011-44-77-997-8005
	 	 	(Phone Number)
	 	 	 
	    	 	Greg.Burgess@etfsecurities.com
	    	 	
(Email Address)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                    EXHIBIT 12


                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II
                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING II, L.P.
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
          COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                             (dollars in thousands)



                             FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED           FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                    APRIL 1, 2005                       MARCH 26, 2004
                          ----------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                            MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                              PREFERRED         PREFERRED          PREFERRED        PREFERRED
                          CAPITAL TRUST II  FUNDING II, L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST II FUNDING II, L.P.
                          ----------------  ----------------  ---------------- ----------------

<S>                              <C>               <C>                 <C>             <C>

Earnings                         $  6,186          $  7,225            $  6,186        $  7,211
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========


Fixed charges                    $      -          $      -            $      -        $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution requirements          6,000             6,186               6,000           6,186
                                 --------          --------            --------        --------

Total combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements       $  6,000          $  6,186            $  6,000        $  6,186
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
 fixed charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                        1.03              1.17                1.03            1.17
</TABLE>
#### KING, Respondent, v. FISHER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by William King against Robert C. Fisher and another.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7089

TYRONE L. JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus D.A. BRAXTON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-92-847) Submitted: September 9, 2004 Decided: September 16, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone L. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tyrone Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2019295EN.01008101.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/81

---

Action brought on 8 July 2019 — Medici v Parliament

(Case T-477/19)

(2019/C 295/106)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Rita Medici (Bologna, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined the applicant’s survivor’s pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined the applicant’s survivor’s pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;

| — | order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cameron Bennett, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Forma, J.—attempted assault, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bluefly, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q for the  period  ending  September  30,  2007,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
C. Barry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

        1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Patrick C. Barry
-----------------------
Patrick C. Barry
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2007
# C_2005217EN.01000701.xml

| 3.9.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 7 July 2005

in Case C-208/03 P: Jean-Marie Le Pen v European Parliament (1)

1

(Appeal - Elections of Members of the European Parliament - Lack of uniform electoral procedure - Application of national law - Disqualification of a Member of the European Parliament from holding office following a criminal conviction - Measure by which the European Parliament ‘takes note’ of that disqualification - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 217/13)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-208/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice lodged on 10 May 2003 by Jean-Marie Le Pen, residing at Saint-Cloud (France), (Agent: F. Wagner), the other party to the proceedings being the European Parliament (Agents: H. Krück and C. Karamarcos), the French Republic, (Agents: R. Abraham, G. de Bergues and L. Bernheim), intervener at first instance — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J. Makarczyk, P. Kūris and G. Arestis, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 7 July 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Le Pen to pay the costs of these proceedings including those of the proceedings for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Le Pen to pay the costs of these proceedings including those of the proceedings for interim measures;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 275 of 15.11.2003

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2062]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations, which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports for Franklin County, Florida and Incorporated Areas.

# DATES:

This withdrawal is effective July 26, 2021.

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2062, to Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email)                         *patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email)                         *patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On October 29, 2020, FEMA published a proposed notice at 85 FR 68586, proposing flood hazard determinations for Franklin County, Florida and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing the proposed notice.

*Authority:*42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.                

Michael M. Grimm,

Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2021-15873 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
#### In the Matter of County of Niagara, Respondent, v Richard F. Daines, Commissioner, New York State Department of Health, et al., Appellants.

[944 NYS2d 713]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Centra and Lindley, JJ.
PEOPLES-SIDNEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with then Quarterly Report of Peoples-Sidney Financial Corporation
(the  "Corporation")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as
furnished  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date of this
Certification  (the  "Report"),  I, Douglas  Stewart,  the  President  and Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation, and, I, Debra A. Geuy, the Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the  Corporation,  certify,  pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Corporation.


                          /s/ Douglas Stewart
                          -------------------
                          Douglas Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer

                          Date: November 15, 2004


                          /s/ Debra A. Geuy
                          -----------------
                          Debra A. Geuy, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

                          Date: November 15, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             29.