alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 29 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2011

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the United States Capitol for an 
event to present the Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to Neil A. 
  Armstrong, Edwin E. ``Buzz'' Aldrin, Jr., Michael Collins, and John 
Herschel Glenn, Jr., in recognition of their significant contributions 
                              to society.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL TO PRESENT 
              THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.

    (a) Authorization.--The rotunda of the United States Capitol is 
authorized to be used on November 16, 2011 for the presentation of the 
Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to Neil A. Armstrong, Edwin E. 
``Buzz'' Aldrin, Jr., Michael Collins, and John Herschel Glenn, Jr., in 
recognition of their significant contributions to society.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the Senate September 23, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-87958, 333-127367, and 333-181318 on Form S-8 and No. 333-182383 on Form S-3 of Regal Entertainment Group of our report dated March 20, 2013, relating to the financial statements of National CineMedia, LLC, appearing in Regal Entertainment Group’s Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 27, 2012.

 
| /s/   Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| Denver,   Colorado                   |   |
| March 25,   2013                |   |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Angel M. Haynes et al., Respondents, v Onondaga County Department of Social Services et al., Respondents, and Suzanne M. Lockwood, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 823]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Gina M. Glover, R.), entered February 25, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, granted petitioners-respondents Angel M. Haynes and Robert Haynes joint legal and physical custody of the subject child.

Now, upon the stipulation and order of Family Court, Onondaga County, entered March 1, 2012 and upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance sworn to by respondent-petitioner on February 22, 2012, and signed by respondent-petitioner’s attorney on March 7, 2012,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Garni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION:

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                              ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Sentry Technology Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Joan E.
Miller, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
18  U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that,  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)   The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           and 15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.



                                       /s/ JOAN E. MILLER
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                    Joan E. Miller
                                    Vice President -Finance and Treasurer
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

                                    May 14, 2008


A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of  this     written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained  by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.

This  certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by  such  Act,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended  (the  "Exchange  Act").  Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent  that  the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it  by  reference.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                               AHL SERVICES, INC.

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE DATA)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                          MARCH 31,
                                                                                --------------------------
                                                                                    1998           1997
                                                                                -----------     ----------
<S>                                                                             <C>              <C>
Income Applicable to Common Stock
     Net income                                                                 $     1,824      $     651
                                                                                ===========      =========

Weighted Average Shares
     Common shares                                                                   13,605          8,492
     Common share equivalents applicable to
         stock options and warrants outstanding                                         502            181
                                                                                -----------      ---------
     Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares outstanding during
         the period                                                                  14,107          8,673
                                                                                ===========      =========

Per Share Amount
     Basic                                                                      $      0.13      $    0.08
                                                                                ===========      =========
     Diluted                                                                    $      0.13      $    0.08
                                                                                ===========      =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AHL
SERVICES, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) AT SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,527
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,703
<PP&E>                                          64,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 549,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,615
<BONDS>                                        244,641
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                     210,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   549,117
<SALES>                                        683,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               683,348
<CGS>                                          474,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  474,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               175,880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,314
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lloyd Anthonie WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-6740.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 30, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 12, 2009.

Lloyd Anthonie Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Assistant United States Attorney, Jerry Wayne Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*727PER CURIAM:

Lloyd Anthonie Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2006 & West Supp.2008) motion and his motion to reconsider. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motions for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0210 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RYAN M. HILL ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 13 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 3 2023

01/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0210
Case: 1:02-cv-03533 Document #: 113 Filed: 05/06/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:706
# C_2019328EN.01006101.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/61

---

Action brought on 17 July 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Device of a jumping animal)

(Case T-510/19)

(2019/C 328/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gemma Group Srl (Cerasolo Ausa, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark representing device of a jumping animal — Application for registration No 11 573 474

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 April 2019 in Case R 2057/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and GEMMA GROUP S.r.l. to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and GEMMA GROUP S.r.l. to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JAMES C. JONES AND FRANCES T. 

JONES, H/W

v.

SUNOCO, INC., (R&M), F/K/A SUN 

COMPANY, INC.AND F/K/A SUN OIL 

COMPANY, INC., SAFETY-KLEEN 

SYSTEMS, INC., CRC INDUSTRIES, 

INC., 3M COMPANY, ADVANCED AUTO 

PARTS, INC., THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, 

MOE & JACK, ACE HARDWARE CORP., 

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC., D/B/A 

PERMATEX AND D/B/A GUOUT AND 

D/B/A LPS LABORATORIES AND D/B/A 

WYNN'S KENDALL REFINING INC., 

ASHLAND, INC., UNION OIL OF 

CALIFORNIA D/B/A UNOCAL, WITCO 

DISTRIBUTION, INC. WAL-MART 

STORES, INC. HUNT REFINING 

COMPANY, HUNT OIL COMPANY, 

RUST-OLEUM CORP., INDIVIDUALLY 

AND D/B/A PARKS CORP., FUCHS 

LUBRICANTS CO.

PETITION OF: HUNT OIL COMPANY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 61 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court
ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

It is further ordered that the Application for Stay is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, July 14, 2021; 10 a.m.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be conducted by remote means.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meeting—Closed to the Public.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

Decisional Matter.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Alberta E. Mills, Secretary, Division of the Secretariat, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (cell).

Dated: June 30, 2021.

Alberta E. Mills,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-14405 Filed 7-1-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
# C_2020175EN.01002501.xml

| 25.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/25

---

Order of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Jalkh v Parliament

(Case T-183/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Amendments to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure - Major interpellations - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Locus standi - Lack of direct concern - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act - Implementing measures - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 175/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-François Jalkh (Gretz-Armainvilliers, France) (represented by F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by S. Alonso de León and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought under Article 263 TFUE seeking annulment of Parliament Decision P8_TA(2019)0046 of 31 January 2019 on amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure affecting Chapters 1 and 4 of Title I; Chapter 3 of Title V; Chapters 4 and 5 of Title VII; Chapter 1 of Title VIII; Title XII; Title XIV and Annex II (2018/2170(REG)).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Jean-François Jalkh shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Jean-François Jalkh shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 950 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 950

   To amend title 23, United States Code, to repeal a prohibition on 
   allowing States to use toll revenues as State matching funds for 
               Appalachian Development Highway projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2011

 Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 23, United States Code, to repeal a prohibition on 
   allowing States to use toll revenues as State matching funds for 
               Appalachian Development Highway projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MATCHING FUNDS FOR APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT HIGHWAY PROJECTS.

    Section 120(j)(1)(A) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``and the Appalachian development highway system program under 
section 14501 of title 40''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.3
 CERTIFICATION OF DR. WERNER BRANDT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF SAP AG
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date March 25, 2010
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Dr. Werner BrandtName:
    
    Dr. Werner BrandtTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Metalline Mining Company (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB/A. No. 1 for the period ended July 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wayne
      L. Schoonmaker, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Wayne L. Schoonmaker


Principal
      Financial Officer








Dated:
      September 20, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of ITLA Capital Corporation
(the Company) that this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such
report.

|                     |  |                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/ George W. Haligowski                                                         
|                     |  |                                                                                  
|                     |  | George W. Haligowski
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|                    
|Date: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/ Timothy M. Doyle                                                             
|                     |  |                                                                                  
|                     |  | Timothy M. Doyle
Senior Managing Director and
Chief Financial Officer            

This certification accompanies this periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

84