alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 3 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the service and sacrifice of Staff Sergeant 

Salvatore Giunta, a native of Hiawatha, Iowa, and the 

first living recipient of the Medal of Honor since the 

Vietnam War. 

Whereas Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta of the United 

States Army, a native of Hiawatha, Iowa, was awarded 

the Medal of Honor by President Obama on November 

16, 2010; 

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the highest honor awarded 

to members of the Armed Forces for valor in combat; 

Whereas the official citation awarding the Medal of Honor to 

Staff Sergeant Giunta states that Staff Sergeant Giunta 

‘‘distinguished himself conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call 

of duty in action with an armed enemy in the Korengal 

Valley, Afghanistan, on October 25, 2007’’; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SCON 3 RFH 

Whereas Staff Sergeant Giunta joins an elite group of Medal 

of Honor recipients dating back to the Civil War; 

Whereas the production and distribution of a medal of honor 

recognizing individual valor was first proposed by a fellow 

Iowan, Senator James W. Grimes, and the Secretary of 

the Navy was authorized to award the first ‘‘medals of 

honor’’ under section 7 of the Act of December 21, 1861 

(12 Stat. 330; chapter I); 

Whereas Staff Sergeant Giunta is the first living recipient of 

the Medal of Honor since the Vietnam War; 

Whereas Staff Sergeant Giunta displayed true courage in the 

face of enemy fire, risking his own life for the benefit of 

an injured soldier; 

Whereas the actions of Staff Sergeant Giunta represent the 

highest values of the Army and the United States; 

Whereas Staff Sergeant Giunta has demonstrated humility 

and dedication to his fellow soldiers on numerous occasions, stating that the Medal of Honor does not belong 

to him alone, but also to his fellow soldiers, both living 

and dead, for whom he holds the Medal of Honor in 

trust; and 

Whereas the brave actions of Staff Sergeant Giunta, which 

went above and beyond the call of duty, as well as the 

modesty and selfless service exhibited by Staff Sergeant 

Giunta, stand as the embodiment of the best attributes 

of the people of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) honors the service and sacrifice of Staff 

4 Sergeant Salvatore Giunta of the United States 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

SCON 3 RFH 

1 Army, who is the first living recipient of the Medal 

2 of Honor since the Vietnam War; and 

3 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

4 to recognize the valor and heroism exhibited by Staff 

5 Sergeant Giunta. 

Passed the Senate January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Bruce B. Lawton et al., Appellants, v Town of Kent et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from water contamination, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Beisheim, J.), dated August 19,1983, which, upon the motion of the defendants Putnam County and Putnam County Board of Health to dismiss the complaint as against them for nonjoinder of the State of New York as a necessary party, dismissed the complaint as against all defendants “without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to pursue their claim against the defendants in the Court of Claims”.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. *(See, Baisley v Town of Kent,*111 AD2d 299.) Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2, 2013 

# Order

Clerk October 2, 2013

1477 85 (29)

MICHAEL CHARLES WARD

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

, SC: 1477 85

v COA: 313557

Montcalm CC: 12

- 016317

- AH

CARSON CITY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

and STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Defendant s

- Appell ees

.

______________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees pursuant to MCR 7.319(B)(7) is DENIED because MCL 6 00.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Ordinarily, MCL 600.2963(8) would preclude plaintiff from seeking leave to appeal in this Court because of the outstanding fees he owes in other civil case filings . Howev er, applying that statut ory section to bar review of plaintiff’s original complaint for habeas corpus in the court of appeals would violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Smith v Bennett , 365 US 708; 81 S Ct 895; 6 L Ed 2d 39 (1961).

The Clerk shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff

. P laintiff has 21 days

from the certification of this order to submit one of those copies to this Court. By doing that, plaintiff becomes res ponsible for paying the $375 filing fee. MCL 600.2963.

Failure to timely submit the order wi ll result in the appeal not being docketed in this

Court. The Clerk shall retain plaintiff’s pleadings until he timely submits the order or the

21

- day period for doing so has expired

.

Plaintiff is not required to pay an initial partial fee at the time he submits the order

to this Court. T he Department of Corrections is directed to collect amount s equal to 50 percent of the deposits made to plaintiff’s account ea ch month and remit $375 to this

Court when that full amount is collected

. Plaintiff may not file further appeals in this Court from civil cases initiated by him until the entry fee in this appeal is paid in full. MCL 600.2963(8)

.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the use of our report dated June 13, 1996, except as to
Note 11 which is as of August 23, 1996, relating to the financial statements of
TyLink Corporation appearing in the Form 10-K of Sync Research, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1996. We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of this report in the (i) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-00166)
pertaining to the Sync Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Plan, the
Sync Research, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Sync Research,
Inc. 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan, (ii) Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-10941) pertaining to the Sync Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1991
Stock Plan, and (iii) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-12315)
pertaining to the Assumed TyLink Corporation 1994 Equity Incentive Plan and the
Sync Research, Inc. 1996 Non-Executive Stock Option Plan.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1997

                                       56
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December  31, 2003 as filed with the SEC on
the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Ron J.  Copher,  Chief  Financial  Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      (2) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Ron J. Copher

Ron J. Copher
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
March 24, 2005
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00408

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 348th Di st rict Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 348

- 318351

- 20

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### R OBERT 

### S COTT 

### B AUER AND 

### A NGELA 

### B AUER 

### , Appellants

V



### .
P ENN 

### I NVESTMENT 

### F UNDS 

### , LLC
, J OE 

### P ENN 

### , G ENE 

### H AM M 

### II , AND 

### T HE 

### H AMM 

### L AW 

### F IRM 

### , P.C. , Appellees2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On April 9, 2024, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed as

the a pp ellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days, appellants filed

with the court a n appellant s’ brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining

the bri ef ’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P.
10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response. Because appellant s have failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we di smiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant s must pay all costs of this appeal.

Per Curiam

Delivered : May 9, 2024
Exhibit 13.1





PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with this Annual Report of Nordic American Tankers Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Herbjørn Hansson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.








Date: April 7, 2014








/s/ Herbjørn Hansson


Herbjørn Hansson


Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit
23.1
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of our reports dated March 30, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Imperial Capital Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2008.
 
 Form
      S-8 Nos. 333-28901 and 333-86040
              Imperial
      Capital Bancorp, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Incentive
PlanForm
      S-8 No. 333-129703
              Imperial
      Capital Bancorp, Inc. 2005 Re-Designated, Amended and Restated Employee
      Stock Incentive PlanForm
      S-8 No. 333-28931
              Imperial
      Capital Bancorp, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
      DirectorsForm
      S-8 No. 333-129702
              Imperial
      Capital Bancorp, Inc. 2005 Re-Designated, Amended and Restated Stock
      Option Plan for Non-Employee DirectorsForm
      S-8 No. 333-28899
              Imperial
      Capital Bancorp, Inc. Voluntary Retainer Stock and Deferred Compensation
      Plan for Outside DirectorsForm
      S-8 No. 333-28905
              Imperial
      Capital Bancorp, Inc. Recognition and Retention
  Plan
 
 
  /s/ Ernst
&Young LLP
 
 Los
Angeles, California
 March 30,
2009
Exhibit 32.2







Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







|                                  | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|By: /s/ Hua Meng                  | 
|Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer | 



March 27, 2007
# C_2019413EN.01002302.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/23

---

Appeal brought on 14 August 2019 by Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2019 in Case T-209/18, Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-613/19 P)

(2019/C 413/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG (represented by: C. Klawitter, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Autec AG

By order of 24 October 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed and ordered the appellant to pay its own costs.

---
S. 683 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

An Act 

To provide for the conveyance of certain parcels of land to the town of Mantua, 

Utah. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Box Elder Utah Land Conveyance 

Act’’. 

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE. 

(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map entitled ‘‘Box 

Elder Utah Land Conveyance Act’’ and dated June 23, 2011. 

(2) NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND.—The term ‘‘National 

Forest System land’’ means the approximately 31.5 acres of 

National Forest System land in Box Elder County, Utah, that 

is generally depicted on the map as parcels A, B, and C. 

(3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of Agriculture. 

(4) TOWN.—The term ‘‘Town’’ means the town of Mantua, 

Utah. 

(b) CONVEYANCE.—On the request of the Town submitted to 

the Secretary by the date that is not later than 1 year after 

the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey to 

the Town, without consideration and by quitclaim deed, all right, 

title, and interest of the United States in and to the National 

Forest System land. 

(c) SURVEY; COSTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If determined by the Secretary to be 

necessary, the exact acreage and legal description of the 

National Forest System land shall be determined by a survey 

approved by the Secretary. 

(2) COSTS.—The Town shall pay the reasonable survey 

and other administrative costs associated with the conveyance. 

(d) USE OF NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND.—As a condition 

of the conveyance under subsection (b), the Town shall use the 

National Forest System land only for public purposes. 

(e) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—In the quitclaim deed to the 

Town, the Secretary shall provide that the National Forest System 

land shall revert to the Secretary, at the election of the Secretary, 

if the National Forest System land is used for a purpose other 

than a public purpose. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—With respect to the 

conveyance under subsection (b), the Secretary may require such 
S. 683—2 

additional terms and conditions as the Secretary determines to 

be appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### GOLDMAN v. MATZGER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 29, 1907.)

Appeal—Reversal—Necessity op New Trial.

Where the verdict seems to have been given without a careful weighing of the probabilities and reasonable inferences to be drawn from the.testimony, and without due regard to the rule that the party who holds the affirmative of the issues must bear the burden of proof, judgment will be reversed, for a new trial.

[Ed. Note.—Por cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 3, Appeal and Error, §§ 4604-4609.]

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term.

Action by Isidor Goldman against Joseph Matzger. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered.

Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, P. J., and ERLANGER, JJ.

Arnstein & Levy (Emil Goldmark, of counsel), for appellant.

Leopold Freiman, for respondent.

*1094PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the record in this case leads us to the conclusion that the issues should be again laid before a jury for their determination. The contract alleged by the plaintiff to have been made with the defendant is so much out of the ordinary course of business transactions, when viewed in the light of the surrounding circumstances disclosed by the evidence, as to give it more than a tinge of improbability. The verdict seems to have been given without a careful weighing of the probabilities and reasonable inferences to be drawn from the testimony, and without due regard for the well-known rule of law that the party who holds the affirmative of the issues must bear the burden of proof. We are firmly of the opinion that the interests of justice will be best subserved by ordering a new trial.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 226 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 226

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President does not have the 
authority to ignore the statutory debt limit by ordering the Secretary 
 of the Treasury to continue issuing debt on the full faith and credit 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 7, 2011

   Mr. Graham (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. McCain, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. 
   Isakson, Mr. Coats, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. 
  Barrasso, Mr. Johanns, Ms. Murkowski, and Mr. Risch) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President does not have the 
authority to ignore the statutory debt limit by ordering the Secretary 
 of the Treasury to continue issuing debt on the full faith and credit 
                         of the United States.

Whereas clause 2 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United 
        States gives Congress the power ``[t]o borrow Money on the credit of the 
        United States'';
Whereas the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States says, ``The 
        validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, 
        including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for 
        services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be 
        questioned.'';
Whereas Congress has historically limited the Federal debt, either by 
        specifically authorizing the issuance of new debt instruments, or 
        through imposing an aggregate limit on Federal debt;
Whereas the statutory debt limit was established by an Act of Congress and 
        signed into law by the President in 1982; and
Whereas the debt subject to limit has been increased through an Act of Congress 
        and Presidential signature 38 times since 1982: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the Sense of the Senate that the President 
does not have the authority to ignore the statutory debt limit by 
ordering the Secretary of the Treasury to continue issuing debt on the 
full faith and credit of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:6
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:7
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:8
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:9
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:10
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:11
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:12
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:13
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:14
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:15
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:16
Case: 1:01-cv-05894 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/28/01 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:17
Case: 1:02-cv-06240 Document #: 507 Filed: 12/28/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:11113
Case: 1:02-cv-06240 Document #: 507 Filed: 12/28/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:11114
Case: 1:02-cv-06240 Document #: 507 Filed: 12/28/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:11115
Case: 1:02-cv-06240 Document #: 507 Filed: 12/28/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:11116
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

The undersigned, RandallLetcavage, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                theAmendment to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Premier Holding Corporation for the period ended June 30, 2017 fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                informationcontained in the Amendment to Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Premier Holding Corporation.

 

By: */s/ Randall Letcavage*

Randall Letcavage

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 21, 2017
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Regent Assisted Living, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-12157 and File No.
333-12159) of our report, dated March 21, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Regent Assisted Living, Inc. and subsidiary
as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years then ended and our report
dated March 8, 1996 on our audit of the combined statements of operations and
cash flows of Regent Assisted Living Group for the year ended December 31, 1995,
which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 1996.


                                       COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Portland, Oregon
March 28, 1997