alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 133 

To require that new war funding be offset. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6 (legislative day, APRIL 5), 2011 

Mr. FRANKEN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Budget 

RESOLUTION 

To require that new war funding be offset. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Pay for War 

4 Resolution’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEFICIT-NEUTRAL WAR SPENDING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of budget enforce7 ment and except as provided in this section, it shall not 

8 be in order for the Senate to consider budget authority 

9 for overseas contingency operations if it increases the on10 budget deficit over the period of the budget year and the 

11 ensuing 9 fiscal years following the budget year. 


sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 133 IS 

1 (b) OFFSETS.—Budget authority provided for over2 seas contingency operations in a bill, resolution, amend3 ment, motion, or conference report shall be considered def4 icit neutral for the purpose of this section if such author5 ity— 

6 (1) is considered subsequent to an Act of Con7 gress that raises revenue for the designated purpose 

8 of paying for such overseas contingency operations; 

9 or 

10 (2) includes new reductions in spending author11 ity. 

12 (c) IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN.—For purposes of this 

13 section, the following amounts are not required to be offset 

14 with respect to the overseas contingency operations in Iraq 

15 and Afghanistan: 

16 (1) For fiscal year 2012, $118,000,000,000. 

17 (2) For fiscal years 2013 through 2016, an 

18 amount equal to the President’s budget request for 

19 that fiscal year for overseas contingency operations 

20 funds for Iraq and Afghanistan. 

21 (d) BUDGET DETERMINATIONS.—Compliance with 

22 this section shall be determined on the basis of estimates 

23 provided by the Committee on the Budget of the Senate. 

24 (e) WAIVER AND APPEAL.— 


sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 133 IS 

1 (1) WAIVER.—The provisions of this section 

2 may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by 

3 the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, 

4 duly chosen and sworn. 

5 (2) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from the 

6 decisions of the Chair relating to any provision of 

7 this section shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally 

8 divided between, and controlled by, the appellant 

9 and the manager of the bill or joint resolution, as 

10 the case may be. An affirmative vote of three-fifths 

11 of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and 

12 sworn, shall be required to sustain an appeal of the 

13 ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under 

14 this section. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
----

Action brought on 30 August 2006 — Austrian Relief Program v Commission

(Case T-235/06)

(2006/C 261/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Austrian Relief Program– Verein für Not- und Katastrophenhilfe (Innsbruck, Austria) (represented by: C. Leyroutz, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was selected by the Commission to carry out, within framework of the Obnova programme financed by the European Union, a project in Serbia on the basis of the contract signed on 2 April 1998 (‘the Obnova Contract’). By letter of 4 May 2006 the Commission requested the applicant to repay the whole amount agreed under that contract. By the present action, the applicant challenges this decision.

The applicant alleges, first of all, that the Commission was not competent to adopt the contested decision, on the ground that jurisdiction to hear disputes arising from the Obnova Contract lies with the competent court in Brussels.

The applicant further claims that the defendant infringed essential procedural rules. In particular, the applicant's right to a fair hearing was not granted and the obligation to state reasons under Article 253 EC was infringed. In this connection the applicant criticises also the properly to establish the facts.

Finally, the applicant alleges that the defendant abused its discretion by seeking repayment of the whole amount agreed under the Obnova Contract, despite the fact that the terms of the contract were properly fulfilled and the individual projects properly implemented.

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

MARK CORUM,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 10255

D.C. No. 2:16

- cr

- 00240

- KJM

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 14, 2020 * *

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Mark Corum appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

360

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for distribution

of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), and four counts of

production of child pornography in violation of 1 8 U.S.C. § 2251 (a)

. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 20 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 10255

jurisd iction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Corum contends that the district court procedurally erred by applying a two

level enhancement for his role as an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of

the production offenses. See U

. S

. S

. G

. § 3B1.1(c)

. We need not resolve this issue

because, even if the district court erred, the error was harmless. See United States

v. Munoz

- Cam arena , 631 F.3d 1028, 1030 (9th Cir. 2011) (alleged Guidelines

calculation errors are reviewed for harmless ness )

. The record r eflects that, even

without th e challenged enhancement, the Guidelines range was life, adjusted to

1,680 months under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2. See United States v. McCarns , 900 F.3d

1141, 1146 (9th Cir. 2018) (declining to reach challenge to three

- level

enhanceme nt because it did not affect the Guidelines range). Moreover, the

enhancement appears to have had no effect on the district court’s decision to

impose a sentence 110 years below the Guidelines range.

AFFIRMED.
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE
   RELATIVE TO THE SERVICING OF CONSUMER REVOLVING CREDIT CARD RECEIVABLES
                            
          
     The management of the Bank is responsible for establishing and
     maintaining the internal control structure.  In fulfilling this
     responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are
     required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
     control procedures.  The objectives of an internal control
     structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not
     absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from
     unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are
     executed in accordance with management's authorization and
     recorded properly to permit the preparation of financial
     statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
     principles.
          
     We have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
     Bank's internal control structure based on the criteria
     established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued
     by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
     Commission ("COSO") relative to the servicing of consumer
     revolving credit card receivables owned by Chevy Chase Master
     Credit Card Trust I Series 1994-1, 1994-2, 1994-3, 1994-4, 1994-5, 
     1994-6, 1994-7, 1995-1, and 1997-1 and Chevy Chase Master 
     Credit Card Trust II Series 1995-A, 1995-B, 1995-C, 1995-D,
     1996-A, 1996-B and 1996-C (collectively referred to as the
     "Trusts" herein) as of September 30, 1997, and we have
     determined that the Bank maintained an effective internal
     control structure over financial reporting relative to the
     servicing of consumer revolving credit card receivables owned
     by the Bank's Trusts as of September 30, 1997.
         
     However, there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of
     any internal control structure, including the possibility of human
     error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. 
     Accordingly, even an effective internal control structure can
     provide only reasonable assurance with respect to reliability of
     financial statements and safeguarding and management of
     assets.  Furthermore, the effectiveness of any internal control
     structure can change with changes in circumstances.
          
          
          
                                                                              
     Robert M. Hurley                           Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.
     Senior Vice President                      Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
          
          
                                                                      
     George P. Clancy                                  
     Executive Vice President                          
                                                       
          
          November 18, 1997                                      CCINTCON.LTR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,700
<SECURITIES>                                     3,163
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,561
<SALES>                                         27,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,352
<CGS>                                           29,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (498)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (804)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (804)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 National Germplasm Resources Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    References
                        Plant Inventory Books
                                    Atlas of Guatamalan Crop Wild Relatives
                    NewsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center National Germplasm Resources Laboratory Docs





- Plant Inventory Books
- Atlas of Guatemalan Crop Wild Relatives

Servicesheadline bar In 1990, the U.S. Congress authorized establishment of a National Genetic Resources Program (NGRP). It is the NGRP's responsibility to: acquire, characterize, preserve, document, and distribute to scientists, germplasm of all lifeforms important for food and agricultural production. The Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) web server provides germplasm information about plants, animals, microbes and invertebrates. This program is within the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service. National Plant Germplasm System - GRIN National Animal Germplasm Program - GRIN National Microbial Germplasm Program - GRIN National Invertebrate Genetic Resources Program - GRIN


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             606
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             132
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,487
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         65,045
<ALLOWANCE>                                         90
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,984
<DEPOSITS>                                      39,436
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                630
<LONG-TERM>                                     31,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  75,984
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,805
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  573
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    80
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,458
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,731
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,939
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,519
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       40
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (67)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (67)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (53)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.08
<LOANS-NON>                                         52
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    217
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    66
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       22
<RECOVERIES>                                         6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   90
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                90
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             90


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Portman, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PacificHealth
Laboratories, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

DATE: March 28, 2004            By: /s/ Robert Portman
                                    ------------------
                                Robert Portman, Chief Executive Officer
                                (Principal Executive Officer)
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 683 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of certain parcels of land 

to the town of Mantua, Utah. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 683 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Box Elder Utah Land 

3 Conveyance Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

6 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en7 titled ‘‘Box Elder Utah Land Conveyance Act’’ and 

8 dated June 23, 2011. 

9 (2) NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND.—The 

10 term ‘‘National Forest System land’’ means the ap11 proximately 31.5 acres of National Forest System 

12 land in Box Elder County, Utah, that is generally 

13 depicted on the map as parcels A, B, and C. 

14 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

15 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

16 (4) TOWN.—The term ‘‘Town’’ means the town 

17 of Mantua, Utah. 

18 (b) CONVEYANCE.—On the request of the Town sub19 mitted to the Secretary by the date that is not later than 

20 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec21 retary shall convey to the Town, without consideration and 

22 by quitclaim deed, all right, title, and interest of the 

23 United States in and to the National Forest System land. 

24 (c) SURVEY; COSTS.— 

25 (1) IN GENERAL.—If determined by the Sec26 retary to be necessary, the exact acreage and legal 
3 

†S 683 ES

1 description of the National Forest System land shall 

2 be determined by a survey approved by the Sec3 retary. 

4 (2) COSTS.—The Town shall pay the reasonable 

5 survey and other administrative costs associated 

6 with the conveyance. 

7 (d) USE OF NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND.—As 

8 a condition of the conveyance under subsection (b), the 

9 Town shall use the National Forest System land only for 

10 public purposes. 

11 (e) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—In the quitclaim 

12 deed to the Town, the Secretary shall provide that the Na13 tional Forest System land shall revert to the Secretary, 

14 at the election of the Secretary, if the National Forest 

15 System land is used for a purpose other than a public pur16 pose. 

17 (f) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—With re18 spect to the conveyance under subsection (b), the Sec19 retary may require such additional terms and conditions 
4 

†S 683 ES

1 as the Secretary determines to be appropriate to protect 

2 the interests of the United States. 

Passed the Senate November 2, 2011. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 683 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of certain parcels of 

land to the town of Mantua, Utah.