alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                                              <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,584
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         4,250
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               273
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         903
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           894
<LOANS>                                        72,437
<ALLOWANCE>                                    318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 83,960
<DEPOSITS>                                     75,117
<SHORT-TERM>                                   238
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,098
<LONG-TERM>                                    4,502
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 83,960
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1,878
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              13
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               66
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1,957
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             861
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             970
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          987
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                221
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 6.1
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1,240
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               933
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,200
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               307
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  10
<RECOVERIES>                                   1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              318
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           318
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        318
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth J. Saunders, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Peregrine Systems, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | Date:                                                                                        |  | November 3, 2004
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
| |  | /s/KENNETH J. SAUNDERSKenneth J. Saunders
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
EX-10.1


  

   

  Exhibit 10.1

  THIS AGREEMENT, dated July 22, 2021 is made and entered into by and between Edison ICAV, an Irish Collective Investment Asset-management Vehicle, acting for and on behalf of its sub-fund, the Essex Fund, as assignee of Baker Bros. Advisors, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Buyer”), and Kodiak Sciences Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Kodiak”) together with its Subsidiary Kodiak Sciences GmbH, a Swiss corporation (“Kodiak GmbH”, and with Kodiak, the “Sellers”) and relates to a Funding Agreement dated December 1, 2019 (the “Funding Agreement”).  All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Funding Agreement.

  Sellers and Buyer agree as follows: 

  1.the Second Payment will not be made and all references to “Purchase Price” mean One Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000).  Any reference to “Second Payment” is of no further effect, and


  2.except as expressly modified hereby, the Funding Agreement is and remains in full force and effect (and all provisions therein, except as modified by this Amendment, shall apply to this Amendment).


  Signed on July 22, 2021.

   

   

  SELLERS

  				
	Kodiak Sciences Inc.
	 
	Kodiak Sciences GmbH
	 

	By: /s/ Victor Perlroth
	 
	By: /s/ Victor Perlroth
	 

	Name/Title: Victor Perlroth, Chief Executive Officer 
	 
	Name/Title: Victor Perlroth, Chairman
	 



   

  BUYER

  			
	Edison ICAV,
Acting for and on behalf of its Sub-Fund
The Essex Fund
	 
	 

	By: /s/ Scott L. Lessing
	 
	 

	Name/Title: Scott L. Lessing, Director
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 21 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 21

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2011

 Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mr. Levin) introduced 
 the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied 
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    ``Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date 
of ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 426/18 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 426 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5818 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 426

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5818 December 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 426/1 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 426/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 426/1

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 426/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

8

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 426/3 | State aid — Portugal — State aid No SA.36123 (2015/C) (ex 2013/N) — Recapitalisation of Banif — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU (
  1
  ) | 10 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 426/3

State aid — Portugal — State aid No SA.36123 (2015/C) (ex 2013/N) — Recapitalisation of Banif — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU (
  1
  )

1

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1572** 

In R e: WILLIAM PENN REAVIS, SR. , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ( 4:07

- cr - 00075

- JBF

- JEB

- 1 )

Submitted : October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
William Penn Reavis, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Penn Reavis, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp 2010) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s doc ket reveals that the district
court dismissed several claims and ordered the Government to respond **.** Accordingly, because the district court has recently taken action in Reavis ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in fo rma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Bluefly, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Melissa Payner-Gregor, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Melissa
Payner-Gregor





Melissa
Payner-Gregor


Chief
Executive Officer


November
8, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, the undersigned officer of RenaissancE Learning, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

      (1)   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
            June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: August 6, 2004

                              /s/ John R. Hickey
                              ------------------
                              Name: John R. Hickey
                              Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY
FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Olimpiu Constantine NEDELCU; Silviu Lucretiu Nedelcu, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 11-4154, 11-4155.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 23, 2011.

Diana Hagen, Esq., Office of the United States Attorney, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Olimpiu Constantine Nedelcu, Salt Lake City, UT, pro se.

Before O’BRIEN, McKAY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

MONROE G. McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Defendants, appearing pro se, appeal the denial of their motions to seal or expunge the record of a 2005 case in which they were both convicted of entering an aircraft or aircraft area by fraudulent means in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1036(a). In these motions, Defendants expressed remorse and offered evidence of their difficulties arising from having their convictions on record. The district court denied their requests on the ground that since Defendants’ felony convictions had not been set aside, the district court did not have ancillary jurisdiction to seal the record on purely equitable grounds. *See United States v. Pinto,*1 F.3d 1069, 1070 (10th Cir.1993). Defendants appealed. This court consolidated their appeals.

After a thorough review of the record, we AFFIRM the dismissal of Defendants’ motions for substantially the same reason given by the district court.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
# C_2019082EN.01006701.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/67

---

Action brought on 15 January 2019 — Karlovarské minerální vody v EUIPO — Aguas de San Martín de Veri (VERITEA)

(Case T-28/19)

(2019/C 82/78)

Language in which the application was lodged: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Karlovarské minerální vody a.s. (Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Mrázek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aguas de San Martín de Veri, SA (Bisaurri, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant in the proceedings before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of the European Union trade mark VERITEA — Application No 15 592 876

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2018 in Case R 499/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the opponent’s opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opponent’s opposition;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT




          AMENDMENT dated as of December 22, 2009 to the Employment Agreement dated as of November 6,
1997 by and between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and Richard E. Dauch (“Employee”), as amended (the “Employment Agreement”):




          1. Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended to read as follows:





     “(a) Base Salary. The Company will pay Employee a salary effective June
16, 2009 at a per annum rate of Two Million, Seven Hundred and Two Thousand,
Three Hundred United States Dollars (U.S. $2,702,300), payable in accordance
with the Company’s customary payroll procedures for senior executives (the
“Annual Base Salary”); provided that the Annual Base Salary for the period
commencing June 16, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009, shall be paid to
Employee on or before December 31, 2009.”



          2. A new Section 16 is added the Employment Agreement as follows:





     “16. Settlement Agreement. Employee acknowledges and agrees that the
Settlement and Commercial Agreement entered into as of September 16, 2009, by
and among General Motors Company, the Company and American Axle & Manufacturing,
Inc., limits the amount of compensation that the Company may pay to Employee,
and Employee agrees to waive the right to receive compensation payable under the
Agreement in excess of that amount.”



          3. Effective January 1, 2010, Section 3 of Exhibit B to the Employment Agreement (relating to
the grant of options and restricted shares) is deleted.




          4. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date written above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Richard E. Dauch

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Forest J. Farmer	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Richard E. Dauch

	 	 	 	Name: Forest J. Farmer	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title: Chairman — Compensation Committee
#### In the Matter of Maria Sierotowicz, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority Leased Housing Department, Appellant.

[946 NYS2d 502]

*959In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Housing Authority Leased Housing Department dated March 24, 2010, in effect, denying the petitioner’s application for a voucher transfer for a one-bedroom apartment under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 USC § 1437 [b] [1]), the New York City Housing Authority Leased Housing Department appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Baynes, J.), dated February 17, 2010, which denied its motion to deny the petition, granted the petition, annulled the determination, and directed it to forthwith provide the petitioner with a Section 8 voucher for a one-bedroom apartment.

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, that branch of the motion of the New York City Housing Authority Leased Housing Department which was to deny the petition as time-barred pursuant to CPLR 217 is granted, the remaining branch of the motion is denied as academic, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The determination by the New York City Housing Authority Leased Housing Department (hereinafter the NYCHA) to issue the petitioner a zero-bedroom transfer voucher, as opposed to a one-bedroom transfer voucher, was final and binding upon her no later than March 24, 2010 *(see Matter of Best Payphones, Inc. v Department of Info. Tech. & Telecom. of City of N.Y.,*5 NY3d 30, 34 [2005]). Pursuant to CPLR 217 (1), the petitioner had four months from the date of that determination to commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking review thereof. The petitioner did not commence this proceeding until September 23, 2010, almost six months later. In addition, to the extent that the petition sought review of other conduct by the NYCHA, such conduct preceded March 24, 2010. Accordingly, the petition was time-barred, and the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of the NYCHA’s motion which was to deny the petition on that basis.

In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to reach the NYCHA’s remaining contentions. Skelos, J.P., Florio, Belen and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6492

ANTHONY LEON HOOVER, a/k/a Anthony Leon Hoover El; TERRENCE 

LEROY WRIGHT EL, as Moorish American Nationals,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

SAMUEL JUNIOR JACKSON; NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY; JAMES LEE 

TROXLER EL; ERRICK L. BOWE; WEBSTER WALLER, a/k/a Webster 

Waller Bey; MICHAEL HOLLIDAY; JAMES K. HOYLE BEY; MAURICE 

HARTGROVE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Sub Jurisdiction Counties; NORTH 

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:14-ct-03220-F)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Anthony Leon Hoover; Terrence Leroy Wright, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover and Terrence Leroy Wright El appeal the 

district court’s order dismissing their complaint under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. 

North Carolina, No. 5:14-ct-03220-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 81I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 081I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6410 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 081I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6410 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 81 I/01 | Commission Decision of 14 January 2021 approving, on behalf of the European Union, the amendments to Annexes 14-A and 14-B of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 81 I/01

Commission Decision of 14 January 2021 approving, on behalf of the European Union, the amendments to Annexes 14-A and 14-B of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN