alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF BILL MCDERMOTT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SAP SE

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SAP SE (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29,
2016 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |        |  |                         |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date March 29, 2016 |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ Bill McDermott      |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Bill McDermott          |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

QROVER SELLERS 

ATl0RWs-f QINCRAL 

6, ir rat forth 

in full a* loll 

and namtwou8 

t berorages in tM8 

bea 88 to wutber 8Wh 

8aur8e, f?tailtas with yaw Opfnlon 

rein you conrldared t&m &feat of 

(j) ol Artiah 667 of tile iha*1 

upon 8 oomtrrct for the peri6d.Q 

butor and a waQla88llr. iiOWW6r, YOU Will &Oti8* 

that t&r ottached contrrat JOFP dlPCom from tk 

fara rhica vab auarldond In Opinion No. 0172,sQ 

ISI U%8t tia8 ln8t,Mt e3ntr8ot i8 l mn&.od botweea 

a b+ewllr and a diatributw, rather t&n betmn 

a di8trlbLtor stid a rotailrr, asi in mat tm 
I 
103 : 
k”. 

104 ,. ,. 

Houoraklr Bert Ford, Page b 

Itl ~OlUW 1 88 phg. 1 Of b’ikli8tOQ OU COilbrbltll, 

a oontrsct i8 defined 88 *a ptoni8e, OP Itit of prVbIIi888, 

for brseoh of w!iich the law gives a remedy, or tha performange og uhiah the 18W in oame -my reoognireo 88 II duty.d 

Under tid.8 d8finition it 18 dfffloult to l :.VidiM OA enforarable atiqtrsab or a#~‘WnWtt for the Puroh88l, OP 8tlh Of 

l aortnia volume OF quo%8 bi l looholio betwage wkioh would 

;~4d~8~dO;o!?43&~~o~~~~8 *V P'jpoboo Or 

It in, therefor., th8 O$?iniQn Ot tilf8 dOp&l’tWUt 

th8t 8 eoutraot l X8aUt8d oh th8 forrl l ub mitt*4 

b. V103.8tiV8 of Seetlon 2?(b) of Artiah 666, V. b K 

y o u wo uld 

.C.Y., 1925. 

iAC+r)r . 

We truot w h8oe 8abirfaetarily aaswr8d your 

rvurs very truly 

,
# C_2019295EN.01007201.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/72

---

Action brought on 4 July 2019 — Di Prima v Parliament

(Case T-458/19)

(2019/C 295/94)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Pietro Di Prima (Palermo, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;

| — | order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.

---
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 19, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-11-00748-CR

____________

ROGELIO RAMIREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 14

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1770773

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to driving while intoxicated. In accordance with 

the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on

July 26, 2011, to confinement for 30 days in the Harris County Jail, with credit for five 

days served. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial and notice of appeal. We 

dismiss the appeal. 

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal stating that 

the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s 

certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The trial 
2

court did not grant permission to appeal, and the record does not contain any rulings on 

written pre-trial motions. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b). Therefore, the record supports the 

trial court’s certification that appellant has no right of appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 

S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Christopher.

Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
# Official Journal C 177E/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2013.177.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 177E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5622 June 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2013.177.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 177E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5622 June 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2013/C 177E/01 | Position (EU) No 5/2013 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless personAdopted by the Council on 6 June 2013 | 1 |
| Statement by the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission | 35 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2013/C 177E/01

Position (EU) No 5/2013 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless personAdopted by the Council on 6 June 2013

1

Statement by the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission

35

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Commonwealth v. Peter J. Hession

Superior Court, Barnstable, SS

No. 0372CR001015

Memorandum Dated July 14, 2004

Connon, J.

The credible evidence before me is that the Yarmouth Police knocked and announced who they were and that they had a search warrant on two occasions before breaching the front door with a so-called “battering ram.” The rule in *Commonwealth v. Cwidrtff,*382 Mass. 137, 140-47 (1980), is that “before attempting forcibly to enter a private dwelling to execute a warrant, police must knock, announce their identity, and state their purpose . . .” The police in these matters did exactly that. The time lapse between the first knock and the forcible entry was 20 seconds, not unlike the facts in *Commonwealth v. Antoine,*417 Mass. 637, 638 (1994). MOTION IS DENIED.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 No. 04-08-00557-CV

THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Appellant

v.

Donald Eugene CARTER,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1993-EM-500955

Honorable Joe Frazier Brown, Jr., Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 8, 2009

REVERSED AND REMANDED

In November 2007, the trial court signed an order affirming a child support arrearage in the

amount of $28,504 and ordering garnishment of Donald Carter’s wages in the amount of $200 per

month in satisfaction of the arrearage. Carter filed a Motion for New Trial and a Motion to Recover

Child Support Payments Made in Excess of Child Support. The trial court heard Carter’s motion

for new trial on January 28, 2008. The Attorney General’s Office (“the AG”) was not represented
04-08-00557-CV

-2-

at the hearing, following which the trial court signed an Order of Default, ordering that the “child

support arrearage be terminated” and that Carter “recover payments made in excess of $200.” This

restricted appeal by the AG ensued. We reverse and remand. 

DISCUSSION

A restricted appeal (1) must be brought within six months of the date of judgment; (2) by a

party to the suit who did not participate in the trial; and (3) the error complained of must be apparent

from the face of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c); Norman Commc’s v. Tex. Eastman Co., 955

S.W.2d 269, 270 (Tex. 1997) (per curiam). The only issue in this appeal is whether there is error

apparent on the face of the record. In its first issue on appeal, the AG asserts the trial court’s

judgment must be reversed because no reporter’s record was made of the hearing that led to the

default judgment. We agree. 

Texas Family Code section 105.003 places an affirmative duty on the trial court to ensure that

the court reporter makes a record of proceedings involving parent-child relationships. See TEX.FAM.

CODE ANN. § 105.003(c) (Vernon 2008); Stubbs v. Stubbs, 685 S.W.2d 643, 645-46 (Tex. 1985)

(interpreting predecessor to section 105.003); Garza v. Garza, 217 S.W.3d 538, 556 n.2 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2006, no pet.). Unless waived by the parties with the trial court’s permission,

the failure to make such a record amounts to reversible error. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN.

§ 105.003(c); Stubbs, 685 S.W.2d at 646. Here, a record was not made of the hearing on Carter’s

motion for new trial or his motion to stay, and nothing in the record indicates the parties waived the

record. Accordingly, reversible error is apparent from the face of the record before this court. 
04-08-00557-CV

-3-

CONCLUSION

We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings. Because

our resolution of the AG’s first issue is dispositive, we do not address the AG’s remaining issues on

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.1.

Karen Angelini, Justice
# Official Journal C 315/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 315 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6323 September 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 315

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6323 September 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 315/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9623 – AMG/Shell/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 315/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9623 – AMG/Shell/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 315/02 | Euro exchange rates — 22 September 2020 | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 315/02

Euro exchange rates — 22 September 2020

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 315/03 | Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 3 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 315/03

Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38492-38493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose

[[Page 38493]]

confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease.
    Date: July 27, 2021.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sara Louise Hargrave, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3170, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
443-7193, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a727b687d687b6c7f69765a777b737634747372347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="177f76657065766172647b577a767e7b39797e7f39707861">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 15, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-15449 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2021019EN.01004901.xml

| 18.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/49

---

Order of the General Court of 30 October 2020 — Gáspár v Commission

(Case T-827/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Transfer of national pension rights - Complaint brought after the expiry of the three-month period laid down in Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - No excusable error - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 19/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Norbert Gáspár (Mensdorf, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Wardyn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 23 May 2018 confirming the transfer to the pension scheme of the EU institutions of pension rights acquired by the applicant prior to his entry into the service of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Norbert Gáspár shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Norbert Gáspár shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bluefly, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Patrick C. Barry,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                         /s/ Patrick C. Barry
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Patrick C. Barry
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

May 11, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,378
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             114
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,135
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     37,501
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        190,396
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 246,901
<DEPOSITS>                                     209,593
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                741
<LONG-TERM>                                     13,604
<COMMON>                                         1,442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 246,901
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,341
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,716
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   141
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,198
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,090
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,875
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,323
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      760
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  17
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,757
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,757
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,209
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.74
<LOANS-NON>                                        698
<LOANS-PAST>                                       110
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    808
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,128
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      345
<RECOVERIES>                                        94
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,636
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,636
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DIANA RUIZ ESPARZA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT

EL PASO

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00094

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

o f El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2013DCV4283 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover fro m Appellant all costs of appeal , for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8 TH DAY OF MAY , 20 23

.

Y VONNE T. RODRIGUEZ

, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez

, C.J., Palafox , J.

, and Marion, C. J . (Ret.)

. Marion, C.J. (Ret.), sitting by assignment