alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-186533, 333-169926, 333-150097, 333-136316, and 333-100900) of our reports dated March 11, 2015 on (i) the consolidated financial statements ofMedallion Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014 and on the selected financial ratios and other data for each of the five years inthe five-year period ended December 31, 2014, and the consolidated schedules of investments in and advances to affiliates as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013; (ii) the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2014; (iii) the financial statements of Medallion Bank as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014; and (iv) theconsolidated schedules of investments as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, all of which appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medallion Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2014. 

/s/ WeiserMazars LLP 

New York, New York

March 11, 2015
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:375
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:376
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:377
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:378
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:379
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:380
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:381
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:382
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:383
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:384
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:385
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:386
Case: 1:01-cv-04805 Document #: 75 Filed: 07/09/04 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:387
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Minera Andes Inc. (the
Corporation), on Form 10-QSB for the six month period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen V. Ambrose, President of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  | MINERA ANDES INC.
|----- |  | -------------- |  | -----------------
|      |  |                |  |                  
|Date: |  | August 11 2003 |  |                  
|      |  |                |  |                  
|      |  |                |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 56 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 56

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2012

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
August 2, 2012, through Monday, August 6, 2012, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, 
September 10, 2012, or such other time on that day as may be specified 
by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or 
adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of 
this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the 
House adjourns on any legislative day from Thursday, August 2, 2012, 
through Monday, August 6, 2012, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, September 10, 2012, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the 
House, shall notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, 
to reassemble at such place and time as they may designate if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT NOVEMBER 30, 1998, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF 
OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT FOR THE SIX 
MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                          28,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      293
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,521
<PP&E>                                          99,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,285
<BONDS>                                         92,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,293
<PREFERRED>                                     20,299
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,331)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,447
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,686
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (442)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (617)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (617)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2019288EN.01006701.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/67

---

Action brought on 15 July 2019 — Workspace Group v EUIPO — Technopolis (UMA WORKSPACE)

(Case T-506/19)

(2019/C 288/82)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Workspace Group plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Hine, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Technopolis Oyj (Oulu, Finland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark UMA WORKSPACE — Application for registration No 16 443 111

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 May 2019 in Case R 1910/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | uphold the opposition decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the opposition decision;

| — | refuse the contested application; |
| --- | --- |

—

refuse the contested application;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 27 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 27 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2021228EN.01002801.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Crédit Lyonnais v ECB

(Case T-504/19) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 4(1)(d) and Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Calculation of the leverage ratio - ECB’s partial refusal to authorise the exclusion of exposures meeting certain conditions - Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Failure to examine all the relevant aspects of the individual case - Res judicata - Article 266 TFEU)

(2021/C 228/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Crédit Lyonnais (Lyon, France) (represented by: A. Champsaur and A. Delors, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: J. Poscia, R. Ugena and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents, and H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCAG-39 adopted by the ECB on 3 May 2019, pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) and Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the ECB concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63), and Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1, corrigenda OJ 2013 L 208, p. 68, and OJ 2013 L 321, p. 6), in so far as it refuses to authorise the applicant to exclude certain exposures from the calculation of the leverage ratio.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCAG-39 adopted by the ECB on 3 May 2019 in so far as it refused to authorise Crédit Lyonnais to exclude from the calculation of the leverage ratio 34 % of its exposures to the Caisse des dépôts et consignations; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCAG-39 adopted by the ECB on 3 May 2019 in so far as it refused to authorise Crédit Lyonnais to exclude from the calculation of the leverage ratio 34 % of its exposures to the Caisse des dépôts et consignations;

| 2. | Orders the ECB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the ECB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.

---
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Gregory J. Dawson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kentucky Bancshares,
Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.
Date:   March 30, 2005
BY  /s/ Gregory J. Dawson
Gregory J. Dawson
Chief Financial Officer
93
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 115 

Designating July 8, 2011, as ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation Day’’ and recognizing that the collection and restoration of historic and classic cars 

is an important part of preserving the technological achievements and 

cultural heritage of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2011 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. BURR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 8, 2011, as ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation 

Day’’ and recognizing that the collection and restoration 

of historic and classic cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic 

automobiles as a pastime and do so with great passion 

and as a means of individual expression; 

Whereas the Senate recognizes the effect that the more than 

100-year history of the automobile has had on the economic progress of the Nation and supports wholeheartedly all activities involved in the restoration and exhibition of classic automobiles; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 115 IS 

Whereas collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an activity shared across generations and 

across all segments of society; 

Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses 

have been instrumental in preserving a historic part of 

the heritage of this Nation by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage works of art; 

Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, highskilled jobs for people in all 50 States; and 

Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, 

photography, cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits 

that have become part of the popular culture of the 

United States: Now therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 8, 2011, as ‘‘Collector Car 

3 Appreciation Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes that the collection and restora5 tion of historic and classic cars is an important part 

6 of preserving the technological achievements and cul7 tural heritage of the United States; 

8 (3) encourages the Department of Education, 

9 the Department of Transportation, and other Fed10 eral agencies to support events and commemorations 

11 of ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation Day’’, including exhi12 bitions and educational and cultural activities for 

13 young people; and 

14 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

15 to engage in events and commemorations of ‘‘ColVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:35 Mar 30, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR115.IS SR115

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 115 IS 

1 lector Car Appreciation Day’’ that create opportuni2 ties for collector car owners to educate young people 

3 on the importance of preserving the cultural heritage 

4 of the United States, including through the collec5 tion and restoration of collector cars. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2022128EN.01001901.xml

| 21.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — Leonardo v Frontex

(Case T-849/19) (1)

(Public supply contracts - Tendering procedure - Aerial surveillance services - Action for annulment - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility - Non-contractual liability)

(2022/C 128/26)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Leonardo SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Esposito, F. Caccioppoli and G. Calamo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) (represented by: H. Caniard, C. Georgiadis, A. Gras and S. Drew, acting as Agents, and by M. Umbach, F. Biebuyck, V. Ost and M. Clarich, lawyers)

Re:

First, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the contract notice FRONTEX/OP/888/2019/JL/CG of 18 October 2019 entitled ‘Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) for Medium Altitude Long Endurance Maritime Aerial Surveillance’, as amended, of the documents included in the annex thereto, of the questions and answers published by Frontex, of the minutes of the Information Meeting held at Frontex’s premises on 28 October 2019, of the decision awarding that contract and of any other prior, associated or subsequent act, and, secondly, application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Leonardo SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Leonardo SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeanette Corriere, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rubin, J.), rendered April 15,1981, affirmed. *(See, People v Charleston,*54 NY2d 622; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636.) Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION:

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                              ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Sentry Technology Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q  for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Joan E.
Miller, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
18  U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that,  to  my  knowledge:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
        15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
        Company.



                              /s/ JOAN E. MILLER
                          -------------------------------------------------
                              Joan E. Miller
                              Vice President -Finance and Treasurer
                              (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

                              August 11, 2008


A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of  this     written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained  by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.

This  certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by  such  Act,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended  (the  "Exchange  Act").  Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent  that  the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it  by  reference.