alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## j /

I I

,

I

I

/ I OFFICE OF THE A?-l-ORNEYGENERAL **OF** TEXAG AUSTIN

aarable John 1. Turner couut y Attornep Bee County Beevil:e,Texas Dear sir:

**,~^ :**  opfplonNO. O-4004 Her whether deQw@mt tax att0mey 

## r0r independentw00i dlatrlat to make barger for stationery, rtaarps, etc., in addition to 15% of the amount **oollectsd**
ve hove reaelved your letter of resent date In which pow asticthe opinion of thl8 depestment upon the above aaptloned ~qlM%ltiOn.

The &tatute#whlah gotern the making of delZnqtient te.x aontraatuwith independentrahool dirtriatr We Arttale 7343, 7335, and 73356, VernonlaAnnotated Civil StatUtee. It ~88 deiinltely **determined**by the Commirrian of Appeala In the resent ease of Bell v. Manafield IndependentWho01 **Dint.,** l29 3. U. (2d) 629, that 15% of the taxee oolleotedyes the 1~6~.Imum mount alloved **by** l.av-to a tax attorney for ti independent sahoo2district, and that a contraat allowingmore than tb.at amoUnt vae void.
we quote fYom the opl.nAon oi the aourt, I As above olnted out, the rrpeoiiio leugu&e’oi Artiale 73 3 $ governs the &araeter of contraatvi&lapth8 partlea oould make. That language ll.mLta

the oomgenaatlon to thsrt provided by lav in elite for state and oountg ta%ee. That amount la limited to fift8eIi per Gent 0P the mount colleoted and there le no authority io l&v for the payment of a gmater p8rWntag8. The ContreotUnder revlev provides for the payment of twentyper amt. Art. 7335a, 8 2.“.St ia, for that 

### reason,void.



## I :Bonorable John X. Turner, page 2

It ia

## ruurfreat

that unleaa the echo01 dirtriotpay@ for the 

### rtationery,atsmpta, etc., items, th8 t.S.X attorney muat provide auoh It ia alio aunifest that if the tax attorney 

### reoelver of the mount oolleotedplU0 a payment for the abovementioned 15s item8 he vill rsaelve

### more than 15s of the amount oolleoted, the mulmum amount alloved by lav. Under the holding of the Comiarion of Appeals in the above cited case, tbla cannot be done.

In vlev of the foregoing, you are respectfully advised that (L

delinquent tax attorney for an independent sohool dlrtrict say a.ot

make ohrrger 

### Sor atampa, etatlonery, eto., In addition to 15s of the amount of taxel oOll8at8d.

**l3US:db** Very 

### trulyyoura ATTORBEX 

### OERERALOF TE2X3

018Il.UIt. Lavia Aaaietant
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11476]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Rebel, Jester, Mystic, Poet: 
Contemporary Persians--The Mohammed Afkhami Collection'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Rebel, Jester, Mystic, Poet: 
Contemporary Persians--The Mohammed Afkhami Collection'' at the Asia 
Society, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, 
further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United 
States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered 
that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b382e283f222425797f7e720b383f2a3f2e652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0d3c5c3d4c9cfce92949599e0d3d4c1d4c58ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000.

Matthew R. Lussenhop,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-15963 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 11





CURAGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY


COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


(unaudited)





|                                                                                                     |  | Three Months Ended

September 30, |   | Nine Months Ended

September 30,
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | - | --------------------------------
|
|Net loss before income taxes and minority

     interest                                             |  | $  (7,274,807                     | ) |                                 
|Income tax benefit                                                                                   |  | 270,000                           |   |                                 
|Minority interest                                                                                    |  | (46,235                           | ) |                                 
|                                                                                                     |  |                                   |   |                                 
|Net loss                                                                                             |  | $  (7,051,042                     | ) |                                 
|                                                                                                     |  |                                   |   |                                 
|Basic and diluted net loss per share                                                                 |  | $          (0.18                  | ) |                                 
|                                                                                                     |  |                                   |   |                                 
|Weighted average number of shares used in

     computing basic and diluted net loss per

     share |  | 38,743,862                        |   |                                 
|                                                                                                     |  |                                   |   |
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 933 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and increase the 

exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters and emergency 

medical responders. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2011 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

and increase the exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters and emergency medical responders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Volunteer Responder 

5 Incentive Protection Reauthorization Act of 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 933 IS

1 SEC. 2. BENEFITS PROVIDED TO VOLUNTEER FIRE2 FIGHTERS AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL RE3 SPONDERS. 

4 (a) INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION ON QUALI5 FIED PAYMENTS.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

6 139B(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘$30’’ and inserting ‘‘$50’’. 

8 (b) EXTENSION.—Subsection (d) of section 139B of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

11 2013’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Yearly Report of Patriot Bank Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Elko,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ RICHARD A. ELKO
---------------------------
Richard A. Elko
Chief Executive Officer
March 17, 2003

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Yearly Report of Patriot Bank Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James G. Blume,
Chief Financial Officer o the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ JAMES G. BLUME
------------------------
James G. Blume
Chief Financial Officer
March 17, 2003

                                        2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 13, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41391 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS GRIJALBA-CELIS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-701-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Carlos Grijalba-Celis (Grijalba) appeals his conviction and the sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Grijalba argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in the light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Grijalba concedes, this argument is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998); United States v.No. 04-41391 -2- Izaguirre-Flores , 405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 253 (2005). Grijalba also argues, for the first time on appeal, that the district court erred by imposing a sentence pursuant to the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines system held unconstitutional in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Because the district court erred in sentencing Grijalba pursuant to a mandatory Guidelines scheme, he meets the first two requirements for relief under plain error review. See United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993); United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 267 (2005). The Government concedes that Grijalba can satisfy the third prong of plain error by showing that the district court felt constrained by the Sentencing Guidelines and most likely would have imposed a lower sentence under an advisory Guidelines scheme. We find nothing in the record that disturbs the Government’s representation. Accordingly, Grijalba’s conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is AFFIRMED; his sentence, however, is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 99.1





Certification


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of CuraGen Corporation,
a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 14, 2002

By: /s/    Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer, President andChairman of the Board(principal executive officer)Dated: November 14, 2002

By: /s/    David M. WurzerDavid M. WurzerExecutive Vice-President, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer(principal financial and accounting officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 189, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate disclosure document.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Romeo HERNANDEZ-ESTEBAN, a.k.a. Carlos R. Hernandez, a.k.a. Carlos Roman Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-11045

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 29, 2011.

*446Peggy Morris Ronca, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Myrna Amelia Mesa, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, Robert E. O’Neill, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Craig L. Crawford, Donna Lee Elm, James T. Skuthan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant Appellant.

Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Romeo Hernandez-Esteban (“Hernandez”) was convicted on a plea of guilty to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2) (illegal reentry into the United States following a previous deportation), and the district court sentenced him to a prison term of 24 months. He now appeals, raising one argument: the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence by failing to consider sentencing disparities between fast-track and non-fast-track jurisdictions when considering a downward variance from the Guidelines sentencing.

We rejected this argument in *United States v. Vegor-Castillo,*540 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir.2008). *Vega-Castillo*constitutes binding precedent. We are therefore constrained to follow it “unless and until it is overruled by this court *en banc*or by the Supreme Court.” *United States v. Brown,*342 F.3d 1245, 1246 (11th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED.
# L_2013198EN.01S00301.xml

| 23.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 198/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 198/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
**Exhibit32.1**

**ASPYRA, INC.**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,2007 (the “Report”) by Aspyra, Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned herebycertifies that to their knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.
| Date: August 20, 2007                                  |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                   |   |   |
| /S/ Steven M. Besbeck                                  |   |   |   |   |
| Steven M. Besbeck, President, Chief Executive  Officer |   |   |
|                                                        |        |        |  |  |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Aspyra, Inc. and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Premier Holding Corp.(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jasmine Gregory, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  March 24, 2010 | Jasmine Gregory
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------
**Exhibit****31.2**

 

**METALLINE****MINING****COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Wayne L. Schoonmaker,certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofMetalline Mining Company.

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations, and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The small business issuer’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for thesmall business issuer and have:

 

a)             designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of thesmall business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

5.             The small business issuer’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)             all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design  or operation ofinternal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thesmall business issuer’s internal controls.

 

Date: March 17, 2005

 

 

 
| /s/ Wayne L. Schoonmaker |
|--------------------------|

Principal Financial Officer

 

E-3

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc.
and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), I, Raymond L. Lawless, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                |  |  |  |  |  |                                           
|------ |  | -------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|       |  |                |  | 
|Dated: |  | March 30, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    RAYMOND L.
LAWLESS                 
|       |  |                |  |  |  |  |  | Raymond L. Lawless Chief Financial Officer



The above
certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.