alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3536EM

_____________ Scott Collier, * * Appellant, *

* v. * * Board of Police Commissioners of the * City of St. Louis; Anne Marie Clarke; * Robert Haar; Charles Mischeaux; * Matthew Padberg; Mayor Freeman * Appeal from the United States Bosley, Jr., in their official capacities as * District Court for the Eastern members of the Board of Police * District of Missouri. Commissioners of the City of St. Louis; * Clarence Harmon; Gary Sperber; Linn * [UNPUBLISHED] Laird; Edward Halveland, in their * official capacities as Police Officers of * the St. Louis Metropolitan Police * Department, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: March 11, 1998

Filed: March 18, 1998

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.-2-

Scott Collier appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in a civil rights action brought by Collier after he was shot by fellow police officers when a drug investigation erupted into a gunfight. Having reviewed the record and th e parties' briefs, we see no error b y the district court. We thus affirm on the basis of the district court's orders. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 10-00365 Doc 1 Filed 01/07/10 Entered 01/07/10 08:16:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 5
Case 10-00365 Doc 1 Filed 01/07/10 Entered 01/07/10 08:16:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 5
Case 10-00365 Doc 1 Filed 01/07/10 Entered 01/07/10 08:16:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 5
Case 10-00365 Doc 1 Filed 01/07/10 Entered 01/07/10 08:16:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 5
Case 10-00365 Doc 1 Filed 01/07/10 Entered 01/07/10 08:16:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 5
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the use of our report dated June 13, 1996, except as
to Note 11 which is as of August 23, 1996, relating to the financial statements
of TyLink Corporation appearing in the Form 10-K of Sync Research, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1997. We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of this report in the (i) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-00166)
pertaining to the Sync Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Plan, the
Sync Research, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Sync Research,
Inc. 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan, (ii) Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-10941) pertaining to the Sync Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 1991
Stock Plan, and (iii) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-12315)
pertaining to the Assumed TyLink Corporation 1994 Equity Incentive Plan and the
Sync Research, Inc. 1996 Non-Executive Stock Option Plan.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1998
#### Jean Gerardi et al., Respondents, v Incorporated Village of Valley Stream et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant, and Frank Buscher et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants Frank Buscher and Anna B. Miller appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Berman, J.), entered November 16, 1983, as denied those branches of their motion which sought (1) an order striking the case from the Trial Calendar; (2) permission to serve interrogatories upon codefendants Incorporated Village of Valley Stream and Nassau County; and (3) permission to conduct an examination before trial of a nonparty witness.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The 20-day period within which a motion to strike an action from the Trial Calendar must be made is measured from the date of filing of the note of issue and statement of readiness, not the date of receipt (22 NYCRR 675.3). Thus, since appellants failed to show good cause for the delay, Special Term properly denied that branch of the motion as untimely.

As to appellants’ belated disclosure requests, they were properly denied because appellants failed to show that, subsequent to the action being placed on the Trial Calendar, “unusual and unanticipated conditions” arose which made such disclosure necessary (22 NYCRR 675.7). Indeed, appellants were made aware of that need at least eight months prior to the filing of the note of issue and statement of readiness. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Antitrust Division
 Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18a, as added by Title II of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, requires persons contemplating certain mergers or acquisitions to give the Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General advance notice and to wait designated periods before consummation of such plans. Section 7A(b)(2) of the Act permits the agencies, in individual cases, to terminate this waiting period prior to its expiration and requires that notice of this action be published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . The following transaction was granted early termination—on the date indicated—of the waiting period provided by law and the premerger notification rules. The listing includes the transaction number and the parties to the transaction. The Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice made the grants. Neither agency intends to take any action with respect to these proposed acquisitions during the applicable waiting period.
                    ( print page 40211) Early Termination Granted
[07/21/2021]
20211736
G
Green Dot Corporation; Republic Bancorp, Inc.; Republic Bank & Trust Company.
 Suzanne Morris, Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice.


[FR Doc. 2021-15904 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# C_2021206EN.01002201.xml

| 31.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Tehrani v EUIPO — Blue Genes (Earnest Sewn)

(Case T-853/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Earnest Sewn - Declaration of invalidity - Absolute ground for refusal - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 206/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Reza Hossein Khan Tehrani (Nordhorn, Germany) (represented by: D. Wiedemann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Blue Genes, Inc. (Gardena, California, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2019 (Case R 531/2018-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Blue Genes and Mr Tehrani.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Reza Hossein Khan Tehrani to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Reza Hossein Khan Tehrani to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<CIK>                            0001031002
<NAME>                           MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING II, L.P.
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-25-1998
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                363,939,975
<RECEIVABLES>                                 7,204,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            371,144,343
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              371,144,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         7,204,368
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                 309,278,400
<COMMON>                                     54,661,575
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                371,144,343
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             21,762,665
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              21,762,665
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          21,762,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 21,762,665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
----

**Exhibit      23.1**

**CONSENT      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

| Form                S-3 Nos. 333-102194, 333-102194-01 and 333-102194-02 | ITLA                Capital Corporation, ITLA Capital Trust VI and ITLA Capital Trust                VII                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Form                S-8 Nos. 333-28901 and 333-86040                     | ITLA                Capital Corporation 1995 Employee Stock Incentive Plan                                                                                  |
| Form                S-8 No. 333-129703                                   | ITLA                Capital Corporation 2005 Re-Designated, Amended and Restated Employee                Stock Incentive Plan                               |
| Form                S-8 No. 333-28931                                    | ITLA                Capital Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee                Directors                                                    |
| Form                S-8 No. 333-129702                                   | ITLA                Capital Corporation 2005 Re-Designated, Amended and Restated Stock                Option                Plan for Non-Employee Directors |
| Form                S-8 No. 333-28899                                    | ITLA                Capital Corporation Voluntary Retainer Stock and Deferred Compensation                Plan for Outside Directors                        |
| Form                S-8 No. 333-28905                                    | ITLA                Capital Corporation Recognition and Retention                Plan                                                                       |
# C_2019413EN.01005601.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/56

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 September 2019 — Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-566/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Extension of time limit - No interest)

(2019/C 413/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Scandlines Danmark ApS (Copenhagen, Denmark), Scandlines Deutschland GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Georgieva-Kecsmar and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the formal investigation procedure in State aid case SA.39078 (2019/C) (ex 2014/N) — Denmark — Financing of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link project (OJ 2019 C 226, p. 5).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Jeffrey R. Elliott, Respondent.

Kane, J.

— Appeal from an order of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nelson, J.), entered September 13, 1985, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence.

While on routine patrol on November 9, 1984, at about 11:15 p.m., Officer Michael Le Cuyer of the Massena Village Police Department observed a parked car with its passenger door open. Upon approaching the vehicle, Le Cuyer discovered a young female in the car with her feet outside and her head hanging down. She appeared to be intoxicated and in a semiconscious condition. Le Cuyer radioed police headquarters for assistance. He also ran a radio check on the license plate of the car and ascertained that the owner of the vehicle was defendant.

Officer John McPherson was one of two police officers who arrived at the scene and attempted to awaken the young woman. At that point, another young woman approached the vehicle and informed the police that the woman in the car was her sister. The second woman then went into the nearby Gallery Lounge and returned shortly thereafter with defendant. Defendant stated that he was the owner of the car and Le Cuyer asked to see his driver’s license, registration and insurance card. Defendant raised no objection, went to the driver’s side of the car, leaned across, opened up the glove box and retrieved the requested material. McPherson, who was assisting the intoxicated woman on the passenger side, observed aluminum foil and a "marihuana pipe” when defendant opened the glove compartment. McPherson seized the pipe and foil, and arrested defendant. The laboratory report indicated that the perforated paper, which was inside the foil, contained LSD.

In due course, defendant was indicted for the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, a class C felony. Subsequently, defendant moved to suppress the "marihuana pipe” and quantity of LSD seized from his automobile. After conducting a hearing, County Court rendered a decision wherein credibility issues were *918resolved in favor of the People.* However, the court suppressed the evidence, finding that there were no grounds for the officer to request defendant to produce his license, registration and insurance card. This appeal by the People ensued.

We reverse. Contrary to County Court’s conclusion, it was reasonable, under the circumstances, for Le Cuyer to make the routine and innocuous request for verifying documentation from defendant *(see, People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210, 218). Moreover, the uncontroverted fact is that defendant *voluntarily*complied with Le Cuyer’s request. In sum, Le Cuyer did nothing to defendant except request to see identification. Defendant agreed and the result was the plain-view observation. Accordingly, we reverse County Court’s ruling and deny the suppression motion.

Order reversed, on the law, and motion denied. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Harvey, JJ., concur.

*

 Defendant offered testimony to the effect that, prior to his arrival at the scene, the police had conducted a complete search of his vehicle.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00606-CR

Joshua Jamal Jenkins

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

147th District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-1-DC-12-206684

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 29, 2015
EXHIBIT 99.3

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Kathleen  Bright,  as Chief  Executive  Officer of Radix  Marine,  Inc. (the
"Company")  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Form 10-QSB report for the period ending September 30, 2003
as filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report") fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: February 18, 2004                       /s/ Kathy Bright, President
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               KATHLEEN BRIGHT, CEO
Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:42

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:43

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:44

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:45

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:46

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:47

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:48

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:49

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:50

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:51

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:52

Case: 1:01-cr-00817 Document #: 28 Filed: 09/16/02 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:53
ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION
                                       OF
                                WARWICK HOTEL LLC
             UNDER SECTION 203 OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW

           The undersigned, for the purpose of forming a limited liability
company pursuant to Section 203 of the New York Limited Liability Company Law,
hereby certifies:

         1. The name of the limited liability company is WARWICK HOTEL LLC (the
"Company").

         2. The office of the Company shall be located in the County of Monroe,
State of New York.

         3. The Company is not to have a specific date of dissolution in
addition to the events of dissolution set forth in Section 701 of the New York
Limited Liability Company Law.

         4. The Secretary of State of the State of New York is hereby designated
as the agent of the Company upon whom process in any action or proceeding
against it may be served and the address to which the Secretary of State shall
mail a copy of process in any action or proceeding against the Company which may
be served upon him is: 100 Corporate Woods, Rochester, New York 14623.

         5. The Company shall be managed by one or more members.

         6. The Company is organized solely to acquire, own, operate, mortgage,
sell and otherwise deal in and with a single hotel property in the Warwick
Township of the State of Rhode Island, and to engage in and perform all acts and
activities required in connection with or incident to the foregoing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed these Articles of Organization this
12th day of December, 1997 and hereby affirm the truth of the statements
contained herein under penalties of perjury.



                                                 /S/ AMY C. ABBINK
                                                 Amy C. Abbink, Organizer
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 
 In connection with this Annual Report of Nordic American Tankers Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2018 as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Herbjørn Hansson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 (1)
              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
        staff upon request.
 
 
 Date: June 6, 2019
 
 
 /s/ Herbjørn
            Hansson
 Herbjørn Hansson
 Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2022024EN.01003601.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/36

---

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — ZU v EEAS

(Case T-689/19) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Officials - Commission staff serving in the EEAS - Request for reimbursement of mission expenses - Request for assistance - Rejection - Competence of the author of the act - Delegation of powers - Pre-litigation procedure - Designation of the defendant - Partial inadmissibility - Principle of sound financial management - Misuse of powers - Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 24/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 30 November 2018 rejecting the applicant’s requests for the reimbursement of mission costs and for the assistance provided for in Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, in so far as necessary, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 28 June 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint directed against the decision of the EEAS referred to above and, second, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by him.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | ZU shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

ZU shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 423, 16.12.2019.

---