alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020095EN.01001302.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/13

---

Appeal brought on 25 November 2019 by Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2019 in Case T-13/18, Crédit mutuel Arkéa v EUIPO — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Crédit Mutuel)

(Case C-867/19 P)

(2020/C 95/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel (represented by B. Moreau-Margotin, M. Merli, C. Thomas-Raquin, M. Le Guerer, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: Crédit Mutuel Arkéa and European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

By order of 13 February 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) ruled that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed.

---
734 A.2d 1285

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Robert COSTANZI, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Aug. 3, 1999.

Decided Sept. 9, 1999.

Michael J. Barrasee, Dist. Atty., Marisa A. Rinaldi, Asst. Dist. Atty., District Attorney’s Office, for Com.

Christopher Casey for Robert Costanzi.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in *Commonwealth v. Williams,*557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas dated April 1, 1999. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          39,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  444,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,195,058
<PP&E>                                         247,817
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,263,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,167,976
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       607,853
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,263,648
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,616
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,094
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        




</TABLE>
August 16, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAMONTE BONDS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00688

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay al l costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### HARPER et al., Respondents, v. CLINTON COUNTY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by George W. Harper and another against Clinton county and Joseph L. Ñash, as chamberlain, etc.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with usual leave to defendant to answer on payment of costs of demurrer and of this appeal.
#### In the Matter of Yolanda Brinson, Petitioner, v David Axelrod, as Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The record contains substantial evidence in support of the determination that petitioner, a nurse’s aide, abused an el*1011derly patient under her care by causing injuries to the patient’s face and left hand *(see,*Public Health Law § 2803-d; 10 NYCRR 81.1 [a]; *300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176). Hearsay evidence was admissible and properly considered at the hearing *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130; Public Health Law § 2803-d [3]; 10 NYCRR 81.4 [c]), as was the testimony that petitioner admitted the charge to a department investigator and a nursing home employee. The penalty of $450 was less than the maximum (Public Health Law § 2803-d [7]; § 12; 10 NYCRR 81.7 [a]) and was not so disproportionate to the offense as to constitute an abuse of discretion *(see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 233; *Matter of Welch v Weinstein,*114 AD2d 463). We have considered petitioner’s remaining claims and find them without merit. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
#### Mihretu Bulti DASISA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Trustee, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 07-16454.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*118Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.*

Filed Jan. 14, 2009.

Mihretu Bulti Dasisa, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mihretu Bulti Dasisa appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We grant Dasisa permission to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We review for an abuse of discretion, *Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.,*452 F.3d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm.

We lack jurisdiction to review Dasisa’s challenges to the underlying judgment because the notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days after both entry of the judgment and entry of the order disposing of a timely motion for reconsideration. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (a)(4)(A)(vi); *United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.,*513 F.3d 1085, 1096-97 (9th Cir.2008).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Dasisa’s Rule 60(b) motion and rejecting his later filings, because Dasisa did not demonstrate any ground for relief from judgment or any basis for reconsideration. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); *Latshaw,*452 F.3d at 1100-03.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Jack Gregory, certify that:



(1)    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Premier Holding Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2010;





(2)     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





(4)   The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





(5) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: August13, 2010 | Jack Gregory
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Jasmine Gregory, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Premier Holding Corp. for the period ended March 30, 2011;





(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





(4) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





(5) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  April 28, 2011 | Jasmine Gregory
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 USCSECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medallion Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as ofthe dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. 

By: /s/ Alvin Murstein

Chairman and 

Chief Executive Officer 

Date: March 14, 2018
# C_2020201EN.01002401.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/24

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 April 2020 — Leonardo v Frontex

(Case T-849/19 R)

(Interim measures - Public service contracts - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

(2020/C 201/34)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Leonardo SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Parrella, lawyer)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: S. Drew, H. Caniard, C. Georgiadis and A. Gras, acting as Agents, and by M. Vanderstraeten, F. Biebuyck and V. Ost, lawyers)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures as regards a stay of execution of the call for tender published on 18 October 2019 by Frontex, entitled ‘Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) for Medium Altitude Long Endurance Maritime Aerial Surveillance’.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
EXHIBIT32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

David E. Hershberg, Chief Executive Officer ofGlobecomm Systems Inc., and Andrew C. Melfi, Chief Financial Officer ofGlobecomm Systems Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that the quarterly report of Globecomm Systems Inc. onForm 10-Q for the six months ended December 31, 2003 (the"Quarterly Report") fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Globecomm SystemsInc.

|                       |  |                                                                   |  |  |  |  |
|-----------------------|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Date:February 13,2004 |  | By:/s/ DAVID E. HERSHBERG                                         |
|                  |  | David E.HershbergChairman of the Board andChief ExecutiveOfficer  |
|                  |  | By:/s/ ANDREW C. MELFI                                            |
|                  |  | Andrew C.MelfiVice President, Chief Financial OfficerandTreasurer |
|                       |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided toGlobecomm Systems Inc. and will be retained by Globecomm Systems Inc.and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 24, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00459

- CR

IN RE Johny Louise BARRIOS

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On July 8, 2019, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court concludes relator

is not entitled to the relief sought; therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on July 24, 2019

.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of July, 2019

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CR13171, styled The State of Texas v. Johny Louise Barrios , pending

in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4245 — ABP/Europe Realty/Host/HHR EUro CV — HHR TRS CV)

(2006/C 183/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.



|                                 |  |                                           
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|Medallion Funding LLC            |  | New York                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Capital, Inc.          |  | Minnesota                                 
|                                 | 
|Freshstart Venture Capital Corp. |  | New York                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Bank                   |  | Utah                                      
|                                 | 
|Generation Outdoor, Inc.         |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Hamptons Holding LLC   |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Taxi Medallion Loan Trust III    |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Taxi Medallion Loan LLC I        |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Servicing Corp.        |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Sports Media, Inc.     |  | Delaware
# Official Journal C 245/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 245 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6222 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 245

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6222 July 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 245/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9190 — ADP/Bouygues/BPCE/IFC/Marguerite/TAV/ZAIC-A) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2019/C 245/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9314 — Sogeclair/AddUp/PrintSky) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 245/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9190 — ADP/Bouygues/BPCE/IFC/Marguerite/TAV/ZAIC-A) (
  1
  )

1

1

2019/C 245/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9314 — Sogeclair/AddUp/PrintSky) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 245/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2019/C 245/04 | Winding-up proceedings — Decision to start winding-up proceedings in respect of Stronghold Insurance Company Limited | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 245/03

Euro exchange rates

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2019/C 245/04

Winding-up proceedings — Decision to start winding-up proceedings in respect of Stronghold Insurance Company Limited

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 245/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9142 — REWE/Lekkerland) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2019/C 245/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9332 — Ericsson/Kathrein Antenna and Filter Assets) (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| 2019/C 245/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9411 — Parker-Hannifin Corporation/Lord Corporation) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 245/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9142 — REWE/Lekkerland) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

2019/C 245/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9332 — Ericsson/Kathrein Antenna and Filter Assets) (
  1
  )

1

7

2019/C 245/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9411 — Parker-Hannifin Corporation/Lord Corporation) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN