alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 326/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.326.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 326 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5211 December 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.326.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 326

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5211 December 2009

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | European Parliament |
| | | 2009/885/EC, Euratom |
| | * | Final adoption of amending budget No 9 of the European Union for the financial year 2009 | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

BUDGETS

European Parliament

2009/885/EC, Euratom

*

Final adoption of amending budget No 9 of the European Union for the financial year 2009

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2020191EN.01001202.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/12

---

Order of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — AF v FRA

(Case T-31/19) (1)

(Action for annulment and damages - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 - Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ - 2014 Staff Regulations - No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above - 2017 reclassification exercise - Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 191/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: AF (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (represented by: M. O’Flaherty, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the FRA decision of 9 May 2018 not to include the applicant’s name in the list of temporary staff eligible for reclassification to grade AD 13 in the 2017 reclassification exercise and, secondly, compensation for the loss he has allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) shall bear its own costs and pay one quarter of the costs incurred by AF. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) shall bear its own costs and pay one quarter of the costs incurred by AF.

| 3. | AF shall bear three quarters of his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

AF shall bear three quarters of his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.

---
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 16 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for an event to celebrate the birthday 

of King Kamehameha. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO 

4 CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF KING KAMEHA5 MEHA. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

7 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used for an 

8 event on June 5, 2011, to celebrate the birthday of King 

9 Kamehameha. 

10 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

11 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

SCON 16 RFH 

1 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

2 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the Senate May 10, 2011. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 140 (Monday, July 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 40079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Electrified Vehicle and Energy Storage 
Evaluation

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 16, 2021, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Electrified Vehicle and Energy 
Storage Evaluation (``EVESE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, has 
been added as a party to this venture. In addition, AMTE Power, Ltd., 
Caithess, UK, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and EVESE intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 24, 2020, EVESE filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 15, 2020 (85 FR 65423).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 10, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on March 10, 2021 (86 FR 13750).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-15818 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40210-40211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Granting of Requests for Early Termination of the Waiting Period 
Under the Premerger Notification Rules

    Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18a, as added by Title II 
of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, requires 
persons contemplating certain mergers or acquisitions to give the 
Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General advance 
notice and to wait designated periods before consummation of such 
plans. Section 7A(b)(2) of the Act permits the agencies, in individual 
cases, to terminate this waiting period prior to its expiration and 
requires that notice of this action be published in the Federal 
Register. The following transaction was granted early termination--on 
the date indicated--of the waiting period provided by law and the 
premerger notification rules. The listing includes the transaction 
number and the parties to the transaction. The Federal Trade Commission 
and the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the 
Department of Justice made the grants. Neither agency intends to take 
any action with respect to these proposed acquisitions during the 
applicable waiting period.

[[Page 40211]]



                        Early Termination Granted
                              [07/21/2021]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
20211736...................  G              Green Dot Corporation;
                                             Republic Bancorp, Inc.;
                                             Republic Bank & Trust
                                             Company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division, 
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2021-15904 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# C_2019363EN.01002801.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/28

---

Action brought on 7 September 2019 – Osório & Gonçalves v EUIPO – Miguel Torres (in.fi.ni.tu.de)

(Case T-601/19)

(2019/C 363/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Osório & Gonçalves, SA (Galamares, Portugal) (represented by: D. Araújo e Sá Serras Pereira, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedés, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark in.fi.ni.tu.de – Application for registration No 15 982 994

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2019 in Case R 1579/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 897 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 

clarify that uncertified States and Indian tribes have the authority to 

use certain payments for certain noncoal reclamation projects and acid 

mine remediation programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 5, 2011 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. BENNET, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. 

UDALL of New Mexico, and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 

of 1977 to clarify that uncertified States and Indian 

tribes have the authority to use certain payments for 

certain noncoal reclamation projects and acid mine remediation programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION. 

4 (a) RECLAMATION FEE.—Section 402(g)(6)(A) of 

5 the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 897 IS

1 (30 U.S.C. 1232(g)(6)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and 

2 section 411(h)(1)’’ after ‘‘paragraphs (1) and (5)’’. 

3 (b) FILLING VOIDS AND SEALING TUNNELS.—Sec4 tion 409(b) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclama5 tion Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1239(b)) is amended by in6 serting ‘‘and section 411(h)(1)’’ after ‘‘section 402(g)’’. 

7 (c) USE OF FUNDS.—Section 411(h)(1)(D)(ii) of the 

8 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 

9 U.S.C. 1240a(h)(1)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘sec10 tion 403’’ and inserting ‘‘section 402(g)(6), 403, or 409’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2022148EN.01002102.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2022 — Heitec v EUIPO — Hetec Datensysteme (HEITEC)

(Case T-520/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark HEITEC - No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No genuine use of the trade mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))

(2022/C 148/28)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Heitec AG (Erlangue, Germany) (represented by: G. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hetec Datensysteme GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Kockläuner and O. Nilgen, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 April 2019 (Case R 1171/2018-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Hetec Datensysteme and Heitec.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Heitec AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Heitec AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas R.
Young, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of NeoMagic Corporation.

Date: June 14, 2006



By:

/s/ Douglas R. YoungName:

Douglas R. YoungTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                            JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                     1
<CASH>                                                      1,058,638
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 843,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  167,735
<INVENTORY>                                                 2,465,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            4,481,448
<PP&E>                                                      1,637,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                                143,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              6,157,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,106,282
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         7
<COMMON>                                                      231,353
<OTHER-SE>                                                  4,845,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                6,157,616
<SALES>                                                     7,346,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            7,346,471
<CGS>                                                       6,893,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               6,893,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              273,774
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             25,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (6,097,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (6,097,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (6,097,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     .00
        

</TABLE>
#### OSBORNE, Respondent, v. McARTHURS BROS. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by Clarence J. Osborne against the McArthurs Bros. Company. J. M. Goodale, for appellant. H. B. Goodstein, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and to answer, on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. Order filed.

SCOTT, J., dissents.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

The undersigned, RandallLetcavage, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                theAmendment to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Premier Holding Corporation for the period ended June 30, 2017 fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                informationcontained in the Amendment to Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Premier Holding Corporation.

 

By: */s/ Randall Letcavage	*

Randall Letcavage

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: November 21, 2017
Case: 1:02-cv-08387 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/02 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case: 1:02-cv-08387 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/02 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2

Case: 1:02-cv-08387 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/02 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:3

Case: 1:02-cv-08387 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/02 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:4

Case: 1:02-cv-08387 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/02 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:5
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                    * * * * *

The  Bryan-College   Station  Financial  Holding  Company  (the  "Company"),   a
corporation   organized  and  existing  under  and  by  virtue  of  the  General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

FIRST:  That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company,  resolutions
were duly adopted setting forth proposed amendments to the Company's Certificate
of  Incorporation,  declaring  said  amendments  to be advisable  and calling an
annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company for consideration thereof. The
resolutions setting forth the proposed amendments are as follows:

"RESOLVED,  that an amendment to the Fourth Article of the Company's Certificate
of Incorporation that would amend clause A by decreasing the number of shares of
authorized  common stock,  par value $.01 per share from 3,000,000 to 1,500,000,
subject to shareholder approval, is hereby approved; and be it further

RESOLVED,  that an amendment to the Fourth Article of the Company's  Certificate
of  Incorporation  adding  clause D that would  limit the  voting  rights of any
stockholder  who  beneficially  owns in  excess  of 10% of the  then-outstanding
shares of the  Company's  common stock (the "Limit") from voting any shares held
in excess of the Limit, subject to shareholder approval, is hereby approved; and
be it further

RESOLVED,  that  an  amendment  to  the  Thirteenth  Article  of  the  Company's
Certificate of  Incorporation  requiring the affirmative vote of at least 80% of
the shares entitled to vote must approve, an amendment to clause D of the Fourth
Article provided that such amendment is approved by  shareholders,  also subject
to shareholder approval, is hereby approved."

SECOND: That thereafter,  pursuant to resolutions of its Board of Directors,  an
annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company was duly called and held, upon
notice in  accordance  with  Section 222 of the General  Corporation  Law of the
State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by
statute was voted in favor of the amendments.

THIRD:  That said amendments were duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.





<PAGE>


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  The  Bryan-College  Station  Financial  Holding Company has
caused this  certificate to be signed by J. Stanley  Stephen,  its President and
Chief Executive Officer, this 23rd day of February, 1999.



                                       By   /s/  J. Stanley Stephen
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            J. Stanley Stephen, President and
                                             Chief Executive Officer




                                       2