alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust II (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding II, L.P. for
the period ended July 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haig J. Nargesian, Regular
Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II


                              By:  /s/ HAIG J. NARGESIAN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Haig J. Nargesian *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: August 11, 2005
______________________

* Haig J. Nargesian functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Jasmine Gregory, certify that:



(1)I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Premier Holding Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2010;





(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





(4) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





(5) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  September 16, 2010 | Jasmine Gregory
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------- | ---------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 2 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 2

 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 5, 2011

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

    Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of Representatives 
that a quorum of the Senate is assembled and that the Senate is ready 
to proceed to business.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-121562 on Form S-3 and registration statements (Nos. 333-12025,
333-68128, 333-83650, 333-117137, 333-117070, 333-106647, 333-128113 and 333-136575) on Form S-8 of Impac
Mortgage Holdings, Inc. of our report dated May 13, 2005, except as to Note A.2, which is as of March 9, 2007 with respect to the consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive earnings, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, which report
appears in the December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc..

As
discussed in Note A.2, the Company has restated the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|                                       |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Los Angeles, California
March 13, 2007 |  |             

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               PIVOT RULES, INC.

               Under Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law

                            ------------------------


         Pursuant to the provisions of Section 805 of the Business Corporation
Law, the undersigned, being the President and Secretary of the corporation,
hereby certify:

         FIRST:  The name of the corporation is PIVOT RULES, INC.  The name 
under which the corporation was formed is Pivot Corporation.

         SECOND: The original Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation
was filed by the Secretary of State of the State of New York on the 12th day of
April, 1991. A Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation was
filed by the Secretary of State of the State of New York on the 15th day of
May, 1997.

         THIRD:  The corporation wishes to amend the Certificate of 
Incorporation so as to change the name of the corporation to Bluefly, Inc.

         FOURTH: To accomplish the foregoing amendment, Article FIRST of the 
Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation relating to the name of the 
corporation is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

                 "FIRST:  The name of the corporation is Bluefly, Inc."

         FIFTH:  The foregoing amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of
the corporation has been authorized by the affirmative vote of the Board of
Directors of the corporation followed by a vote of the holders of a majority of
all outstanding shares entitled to vote on an amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation at a meeting of shareholders.


<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we hereunto sign our names and affirm that the
statements made herein are true under the penalties of perjury, this 28th day
of October, 1998.


                                                          /s/ E. Kenneth Seiff
                                                          --------------------
                                                          E. Kenneth Seiff
                                                          President

                                                          /s/ Jonathan Morris
                                                          --------------------
                                                          Jonathan Morris
                                                          Secretary

                                       2
#### DUPACO, INC., Appellant, v. David J. KAPPOS, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Appellee.

No. 2010-1562.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 12, 2011.

Edward W. Callan, of San Diego, California, argued for appellant.

Benjamin D.M. Wood, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and William La-marca, Associate Solicitor.

*770RADER, Chief Judge, BRYSON and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 86.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 136 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 136

To authorize document production in United States v. Douglas D. Hampton 
                               (D.D.C.).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 2011

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize document production in United States v. Douglas D. Hampton 
                               (D.D.C.).

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Douglas D. Hampton, Crim. No. 11-085 
        (D.D.C.), pending in the United States District Court for the District 
        of Columbia, documents that have been produced to the United States 
        Department of Justice by offices of the Senate in earlier related 
        proceedings may be needed for use in this proceeding;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possesion but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That records that have been produced by offices of the 
Senate in connection with investigation by the Department of Justice 
are authorized to be used in the case of United States v. Douglas D. 
Hampton and any related proceedings.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul R. Tenney, Also Known as Paul Ryan Tenney, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[945 NYS2d 897]

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered February 11, 2010. The judgment ordered defendant to pay restitution.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in *People v Tenney*(96 AD3d 1403 [2012] ). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
#### Jenny ZAMBRANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., as Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated August 1, 2006, Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-B; Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-B; Litton Loan Servicing LP; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Investor, Individually and as Trust Administrator, Jointly and Severally; Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Incorporated; Glasser and Glasser PLC; John Doe, Certificate Holders I-M, Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-B; Jane Doe, Certificate Holders I-M, Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-B; Jack Doe, Certificate Holders I-M; Jill Doe, Certificate Holders I-M; Qui Chi Doe, Association, Corporations/entities IM, Defendants-Appellees, and Fremont Investment & Loan Corporation, a/k/a Fremont Reorganizing Corporation; Nectar Projects, Incorporated; Long & Neyhart PC, now known as Neyhart, Robertson & McConnell, P.C., Defendants.

No. 10-1724.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 3, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 16, 2011.

Christopher E. Brown, R. Michael Smith, Brown, Brown & Brown, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. John C. Lynch, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Jonathan S. Hubbard, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jenny Zambrano appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her several claims against Defendants, including her state law claims for declaratory judgment and quiet title, and her claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1692-1692p (West 2009 & Supp.2011), the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1601-1667f (West 2009 & *862Supp.2011), and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. *See Zambrano v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A,*No. 1:09-cv-00996-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2009); 2010 WL 2105164 (May 26, 2010); *see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A.,*641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             464
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,847
<INVENTORY>                                      3,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,720
<PP&E>                                          28,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,516
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,927
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,263
<SALES>                                        150,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,232
<CGS>                                           71,818
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,009<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,001
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,814
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,814
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES ARE COMPRISED OF $1,584 RELATED TO MERGER COSTS INCURRED IN
CONNECTION WITH A POOLING TRANSACTION IN NOVEMBER 1996, $300 RELATED TO THE
WRITE-OFF OF DEFERRED OFFERING COSTS AS A RESULT OF THE CANCELLATION ON
DECEMBER 30, 1996 OF A REGISTRATION OF SHARES OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK,
AND $1,125 RELATED TO A CHARGE REFLECTING THE COMPANY'S CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
UNDER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS TO MAKE PAYMENTS TO CERTAIN FORMER OWNERS OF
ACQUIRED BUSINESSES WHO ARE NO LONGER INVOLVED IN OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 11


                           HIE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               (FORMERLY HEALTHDYNE INFORMATION ENTERPRISES, INC.)
              STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                Years ended December 31,
                                                                     ----------------------------------------
                                                                          1998            1997         1996
                                                                     --------------- --------------- --------
                                                                         (In thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                                                  <C>             <C>             <C>    
Net earnings (loss).............................................        $ 1,498        $(8,596)       $   107
                                                                        =======        =======        =======

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding............         24,031         22,587         19,863
                                                                        =======        =======        =======

Basic net earnings (loss) per common share......................        $  0.06        $ (0.38)       $  0.01
                                                                        =======        =======        =======
Shares used in diluted net earnings (loss) per share
     calculation:

     Weighted average number of common shares outstanding.......

                                                                         24,031         22,587         19,863
                                                                    
     Additional shares assumed outstanding from dilutive 
     stock options used in diluted earnings (loss) per share 
         calculation............................................            836             -- *        1,414
                                                                        -------        -------        -------

                                                                         24,867         22,587         21,277
                                                                        =======        =======        =======

Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share....................        $  0.06        $ (0.38)       $  0.01
                                                                        =======        =======        =======
</TABLE>



*       Since stock options are antidilutive to the loss per common share 
calculation, stock options are not considered in such loss per share calculation
in 1997.
Case 10-00558 Doc 1 Filed 01/08/10 Entered 01/08/10 12:56:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 8
Case 10-00558 Doc 1 Filed 01/08/10 Entered 01/08/10 12:56:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 8
Case 10-00558 Doc 1 Filed 01/08/10 Entered 01/08/10 12:56:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 8
Case 10-00558 Doc 1 Filed 01/08/10 Entered 01/08/10 12:56:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 8
Case 10-00558 Doc 1 Filed 01/08/10 Entered 01/08/10 12:56:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 8
Case 10-00558 Doc 1 Filed 01/08/10 Entered 01/08/10 12:56:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 8
Case 10-00558 Doc 1 Filed 01/08/10 Entered 01/08/10 12:56:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 8
Case 10-00558 Doc 1 Filed 01/08/10 Entered 01/08/10 12:56:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 8
Order entered July 28, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00548-CR

No. 05-15-00549-CR

DADRIANNE NICHOLE TURNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-70784-H, F13-55178-H

ORDER

Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to issue 

the mandates in these appeals INSTANTER.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE
# Official Journal C 147/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 147 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4923 June 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 147

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4923 June 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2006/C 147/1 | Council conclusions on promotion of healthy lifestyles and prevention of Type 2 diabetes | 1 |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 147/2 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |
| 2006/C 147/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4229 — APHL/L&R/Netcare/General Healthcare Group) (1) | 6 |
| 2006/C 147/4 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 7 |
| 2006/C 147/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4243 — International Automotive Components/Lear Corporation (European Interior Business)) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |
| 2006/C 147/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4252 — SCA Forest/Jämtlamell Industri) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2006/C 147/1

Council conclusions on promotion of healthy lifestyles and prevention of Type 2 diabetes

1

Commission

2006/C 147/2

Euro exchange rates

5

2006/C 147/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4229 — APHL/L&R/Netcare/General Healthcare Group) (1)

6

2006/C 147/4

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

7

2006/C 147/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4243 — International Automotive Components/Lear Corporation (European Interior Business)) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

2006/C 147/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4252 — SCA Forest/Jämtlamell Industri) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

9

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 147/7 | Call for proposals SUB 01-2006 | 10 |
| 2006/C 147/8 | Call for proposals PIL-2006 | 11 |

III   Notices

Commission

2006/C 147/7

Call for proposals SUB 01-2006

10

2006/C 147/8

Call for proposals PIL-2006

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN