40620 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Notices 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Nominations submitted by State or 

Tribal Historic Preservation Officers: 

INDIANA 

Allen County 

Coca-Cola Bottling Plant, 1631 Pontiac St., 

Fort Wayne, SG100006841 

Harrison Hill Historic District, (Park and 

Boulevard System of Fort Wayne, Indiana 

MPS), Roughly bounded by West Rudisill 

Blvd., South Calhoun St., South Cornell 

Cir., Pasadena Dr., Hoagland Ave., and 

Webster St., Fort Wayne, MP100006844 

Dubois County 

Maple Grove Campground, 6685 Cty. Rd. 585 

West, Huntingburg vicinity, SG100006845 

Fayette County 

Newkirk Mansion, 321 Western Ave., 

Connersville, SG100006847 

Grant County 

Stephenson, Joseph W. and Edith M., House, 

917 South Adams St., Marion, 

SG100006848 

Lake County 

North Gleason Park Community Building, 

301 West 30th Ave., Gary, SG100006843 

Monroe County 

McDoel Historic District, Roughly bounded 

by West Wylie St., South Morton St., 

Patterson Dr., and Clear Cr., Bloomington, 

SG100006846 

Vermillion County 

Elder-Pyle House, 120 Briarwood Ave., Dana, 

SG100006842 

NORTH CAROLINA 

Carteret County 

Earle W. Webb, Jr. Memorial Civic Center and 

Library, 812 Evans St., Morehead City, 

SG100006852 

Forsyth County 

Gray, Elizabeth and Bowman, Jr. House, 5909 

Brookberry Farm Rd., Lewisville vicinity, 

SG100006853 

Rowan County 

Cannon, Ella Brown, House, 202 South 

Fulton St., Salisbury, SG100006854 

Surry County 

Pilot Hosiery Mill, 224 East Main St., Pilot 

Mountain, SG100006855 

OHIO 

Cuyahoga County 

Consolidated Fruit Auction Company 

Building, 601 Stone’s Levee, Cleveland, 

SG100006833 

Hamilton County 

South Crescent Arms, The, (Apartment 

Buildings in Ohio Urban Centers, 1870– 

1970 MPS), 3700 Reading Rd., Cincinnati, 

MP100006851 

PENNSYLVANIA 

Northampton County 

Lehigh Water Gap Chain Bridge Toll House 

and East Bridge Abutment, 1309 Riverview 

Dr., Lehigh Township, SG100006837 

TEXAS 

Caldwell County 

Martindale Central Historic District, Roughly 

bounded by Farm-to-Market Rd. 1979, San 

Marcos R., Madison Ln., and, Crockett St., 

Martindale, SG100006859 

Kimble County 

Kimble County Courthouse, 501 Main St., 

Junction, SG100006858 

Washington County 

Baylor University Female Department, 8415 

Old Baylor College Rd., Independence, 

SG100006856 

Baylor University Male Department, 

(Monuments and Buildings of the Texas 

Centennial MPS), 10060 Sam Houston Rd., 

Independence, MP100006857 

VIRGINIA 

Bedford County 

Bedford Training School, 310 South Bridge 

St., Bedford, SG100006838 

Susie G. Gibson High School, 600 Edmund 

St., Bedford, SG100006839 

Campbell County 

Grove, The, 151 Closeburn Manor Dr., 

Lynchburg vicinity, SG100006849 

Rockbridge County 

Taylor-Kinnear Farm, 1364 Forest Grove Rd., 

Lexington vicinity, SG100006850 

WISCONSIN 

Milwaukee County 

Fifteenth District School, 2001 West Vliet St., 

Milwaukee, SG100006834 

An additional documentation has been 

received for the following resources: 

MASSACHUSETTS 

Essex County 

Rocky Neck Historic District (Additional 

Documentation), 1–5 Eastern Point Rd., 

285 East Main St., Bickford Way, 

Clarendon, Fremont, Horton, Rackliffe 

Wiley and Wonson Sts., Gloucester, 

AD100001502 

OHIO 

Richland County 

Kingwood Center (Additional 

Documentation), 900 Park Ave. West, 

Mansfield, AD76001523 

Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR 

part 60. 

Dated: July 20, 2021. 

Sherry A. Frear, 

Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ 

National Historic Landmarks Program. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15996 Filed 7–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

[Docket No. BOEM–2021–0018] 

Research Lease Issuance for Marine 

Hydrokinetic Energy on the Pacific 

Outer Continental Shelf Offshore 

Oregon 

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of lease issuance. 

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public 

of the Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management’s (BOEM’s) issuance of an 

executed, noncompetitive lease, 

Renewable Energy Lease No. OCS–P 

0560, to Oregon State University for 

marine hydrokinetic research activities 

offshore Oregon and defines the size of 

the lease area. This notice is issued 

under BOEM’s regulations. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Whitney Hauer, BOEM Pacific Region, 

Office of Strategic Resources, 760 Paseo 

Camarillo (Suite 102), Camarillo, 

California 93010, (805) 384–6263 or 

whitney.hauer@boem.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 

24, 2014, BOEM published in the 

Federal Register a public notice of an 

unsolicited request for an Outer 

Continental Shelf renewable energy 

research lease submitted by Oregon 

State University (OSU) for marine 

hydrokinetic (MHK) research activities. 

79 FR 16050 (Mar. 24, 2014). The public 

notice included a request for 

competitive interest (RFCI) and a 

request for public comment. 

After evaluating the comments 

received in response to the RFCI, on 

June 20, 2014, BOEM published in the 

Federal Register its determination that 

there was no competitive interest in the 

area requested by OSU. 79 FR 35377 

(June 20, 2014). On February 16, 2021, 

BOEM issued a lease for MHK research 

activities to OSU for the PacWave South 

project, a proposed open ocean wave 

energy test center, to be located 

approximately 6 nautical miles offshore 

Newport, Oregon. 

The total acreage of the lease area is 

approximately 4,270 acres. The lease 

area is comprised of 12 aliquots (i.e., 

sub-blocks) within Official Protraction 

Diagram Newport Valley NL10–10 

Blocks 6481 and 6531. The project 

easement is a 200-foot-wide corridor on 

which five cables will be located within 

Official Protraction Diagrams Newport 

Valley NL 10–10 Block 6531 and Salem 

NL 10–11 Blocks 6501 and 6551. 

Lease issuance by BOEM is a 

prerequisite for a license from the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Notices 40621 

1The Government notified Registrant in its 

prehearing statement that Registrant’s DEA 

registration was subject to revocation on the 

additional ground that Registrant lacked authority 

to handle controlled substances in Florida, the state 

in which it is registered with the DEA. See 21 

U.S.C. 824(a)(3). The Prehearing Statement was 

mailed to Ms. Isemin at the address that Ms. Isemin 

designated for future filings in her December 20, 

2019 request for hearing. See RFAAX 2, at 2. 

2The Order Terminating Proceedings noted that 

Registrant was not currently represented by counsel 

and ‘‘it appear[ed] that Ms. Isemin [was] appearing 

on the [Registrant’s] behalf.’’ RFAAX 4, at 1 (citing 

21 CFR 1316.50). 

3 In the Order Terminating Proceedings, the Chief 

ALJ stated that ‘‘Agency precedent is clear that the 

unwillingness or inability of a party to comply with 

the directives of the [ALJ] may support an implied 

waiver of that party’s right to a hearing.’’ Id. (citing 

Robert M Brodkin, D.P.M, 77 FR 73,678, 73,679 

(2012); Kamir Garces-Mejias, M.D., 72 FR 54,931, 

54,932 (2007); Andrew Desonia, M.D., 72 FR 54,293, 

54,294 (2007); Alan R. Schankman, M.D., 63 FR 

45,260, 45,260 (1998)). 

4See 21 CFR 1301.43(d) (‘‘If any person entitled 

to a hearing or to participate in a hearing pursuant 

to § 1301.32 or §§ 1301.34–1301.36 . . . files [a 

request for a hearing] and fails to appear at the 

hearing, such person shall be deemed to have 

waived the opportunity for a hearing or to 

participate in the hearing, unless such person 

shows good cause for such failure’’); see also 

RFAAX 3, at 3–4 (notifying Registrant that ‘‘[f]ailure 

to timely file a prehearing statement that complies 

with the directions provided [therein] may result in 

a sanction, including (but not limited to) a waiver 

of hearing and an implied withdrawal of a request 

for hearing’’). 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

which is the Federal agency that would 

approve project construction and 

operations. The lease and supporting 

documentation, including required 

environmental compliance 

documentation and the notices that 

solicited competitive interest, can be 

found online at: https://www.boem.gov/ 

renewable-energy/state-activities/ 

pacwave-south-project. 

Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1337(p); 30 CFR 

585.238(f) and 30 CFR 585.206(a). 

Amanda Lefton, 

Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15998 Filed 7–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Care Point Pharmacy, Inc.; Decision 

and Order 

On November 20, 2019, the Assistant 

Administrator, Office of Diversion 

Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration, issued an Order to 

Show Cause (hereinafter, OSC) to Care 

Point Pharmacy, Inc. (hereinafter, 

Registrant). Government’s Request for 

Final Agency Action (hereinafter, 

RFAA) Exhibit (hereinafter, RFAAX) 1 

(OSC). The OSC proposed to revoke 

Registrant’s DEA Certificate of 

Registration Number BH9966904 

(hereinafter, registration) and to deny 

any pending applications for renewal or 

modification of the registration, 

pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(4) and 

823(f), because Registrant’s ‘‘continued 

registration is inconsistent with the 

public interest.’’ Id. (citing 21 U.S.C. 

824(a)(4) and 823(f)). 

The OSC alleged that Registrant is 

licensed as a community pharmacy in 

the State of Florida. Id. at 2. It further 

alleged that Ekaette Isemin is 

Registrant’s sole corporate officer, and 

that she is licensed as a pharmacist in 

Florida. Id. 

The OSC alleged that ‘‘[o]n six 

occasions, [Registrant] dispensed 

controlled substances to a DEA 

confidential source pursuant to 

fraudulent prescriptions, despite clear 

evidence of diversion.’’ Id. at 2. The 

OSC further alleged that ‘‘[Registrant’s] 

dispensing of controlled substances in 

the face of clear evidence of diversion 

violated federal and state law.’’ Id. at 5 

(citing 21 CFR 1306.06, 1306.04(a); Fla. 

Stat. §§ 893.04(2)(a), 465.016(1)(i), 

456.072(1)(m); Fla. Admin. Code. Ann. 

r. 64B16–27.831, 64B16–27.810). 

The OSC notified Registrant of its 

right to request a hearing on the 

allegations or to submit a written 

statement while waiving its right to a 

hearing, the procedures for electing 

either option, and the consequence of 

failing to elect either option. Id. at 5–6 

(citing 21 CFR 1301.43). 

In response to the OSC, Ekaette 

Isemin filed a timely request for an 

administrative hearing on Registrant’s 

behalf, and requested that all future 

notices and mailings be mailed to her. 

RFAAX 2 (Request for Hearing). On 

December 26, 2019, the Chief 

Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter, 

Chief ALJ) established a schedule for the 

filing of prehearing statements. RFAAX 

3 (Order for Prehearing Statements). The 

Government filed a timely prehearing 

statement on January 6, 2020,1 but 

Registrant failed to file any prehearing 

statement by the deadline. RFAAX 4 

(Order Terminating Proceedings), at 1– 

2. 

On January 21, 2020, the Chief ALJ 

issued an Order Directing Compliance 

and Postponing Prehearing Conference, 

which afforded Registrant until 

February 5, 2020, to file its prehearing 

statement and to show good cause for 

the delay. Id. at 2. The Order Directing 

Compliance and the Order for 

Prehearing Statements were sent to Ms. 

Isemin via first class mail, and neither 

document was returned as 

undeliverable. Id. Neither Registrant nor 

Ms. Isemin filed a showing of good 

cause for the delay or a prehearing 

statement by the deadline set forth in 

the Order Directing Compliance.2 Id. 

Therefore, the Chief ALJ determined 

that Registrant had ‘‘effectively waived 

its right to a hearing,’’ and he 

terminated the proceedings on February 

6, 2020. Id.3 I agree with the Chief ALJ 

that Registrant waived its right to a 

hearing by failing to comply with the 

Chief ALJ’s order.4

On February 19, 2020, the 

Government forwarded an RFAA, along 

with the evidentiary record for this 

matter, to my office. Having considered 

the record in its entirety, I find that the 

record establishes, by substantial 

evidence, that Registrant committed acts 

rendering its continued registration 

inconsistent with the public interest. 

Additionally, I find that Registrant lacks 

authority to handle controlled 

substances in the State of Florida, the 

state where it is registered with DEA. 

Accordingly, I conclude that the 

appropriate sanction is for Registrant’s 

DEA registration to be revoked. 

I. Findings of Fact 

A. Registrant’s DEA Registration 

Registrant is registered with DEA as a 

retail pharmacy in Schedules II through 

V under DEA registration number 

BH9966904, at the registered address of 

1400 Hand Avenue, Suite 0, Ormond 

Beach, Florida 32174. RFAAX 5 (DEA 

Certificate of Registration). This 

registration expires on August 31, 2021. 

Id. 

B. The Status of Registrant’s State 

Authority 

Registrant was previously licensed as 

a community pharmacy in the State of 

Florida under license number PH22199. 

RFAAX 6 Appendix (hereinafter, App’x) 

B (Division of Corporations Printout), at 

1. Registrant’s sole corporate officer was 

Ekaette Isemin, id., who was previously 

registered as a pharmacist in Florida 

under license number PS28851. App’x 

A, at 1. 

On August 20, 2018, the Florida 

Department of Health (hereinafter, 

Florida DOH) ordered the emergency 

suspension of Ms. Isemin’s pharmacy 

license, based on its determination that 

‘‘Ms. Isemin’s continued practice as a 

pharmacist constitutes an immediate, 

serious danger to the health, safety, and 

welfare of the public . . . .’’ Id. at 18. 

The order concluded that Ms. Isemin 

repeatedly violated state law over the 

course of approximately sixteen months 

by dispensing controlled substances to a 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES