alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

I,
Daniel Harvey, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Traffix, Inc. ("Registration");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: February 28, 2005 |  |     |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | By: |  | /s/DANIEL HARVEYDANIEL HARVEYChief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Traffix, Inc. and will be retained by Traffix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R ON AL D K . MAUZ E Y, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. A. P. KA NE, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 16040 D. C . No . C V- 0 5 - 0 3 3 3 7 - MHP ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a r i l y n H . P a t e l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner R on al d K . M auze y app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve 

# FI LED JU N 21 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSW e c e rt i f yf orappe a l , on ourow n m ot i on, the i s s ue of w he the rthe 2004 1 d e c is io n o f

th e C a lif

o rn iaB o a r do f

P r is o n T e rm s ( “th e B o a r d ” ) to d e n yp a r o le v io la te ddu e p r o c e s s . W e d e n yac e rtif ic ate o f ap p e a lab ilitya s to M au z e y ’s c la im th a t th e d e n ia l o f

p a r o le v io la te dh is r ig h ts u n d e rth e S ix th a n dF o u rte e n th A m e n d m e n ts . See 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 3(c) (2). 07- 16040 2 j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 1 M auz e yc ont e nds tha tthe B oa r d’ s 2004 de c i s i on t o de nyhi m pa r ol e w a s not s up p o rte db y“s o m e e v id e n c e ” a n dth e r e f o r e v io la te dh is du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts . F o llo w in g a n in d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e r e c o r d , s e e Hi m es v . T hom ps on , 336 F . 3d 8 4 8 , 8 5 3 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) , w e c o n c l u d e th a tth e s t a t e c o u rt ’ s c o n c l u s i o n th a ts o me e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e B o a r d ’s d e c is io n w a s n o t o b je c tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . See 28 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 ( d ) ; s e e a ls o H a y w a rd v . M a rs h a ll , N o . 0 6 - 5 5 3 9 2 , 2 0 1 0 WL 1 6 6 4 9 7 7 , a t * 1 1 , * 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . A p r . 2 2 , 2 0 1 0 ) . AF F I RME D.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 17

                                  VINCENT TESE
                         C/O BEAR, STEARNS & CO., INC.
                          245 PARK AVENUE - 19TH FLOOR
                               NEW YORK, NY 10167
     
     


                                             February 24, 1998



Mr. Jeffery Schwartz, CEO
Quintel Entertainment
One Blue Hill Plaza - 5th Floor
Pearl River, NY 10965


Dear Jeff:

As per our conversation of several weeks ago, I am in the process of launching a
new business. In addition, I am presently on the Board of five business
corporations and three charitable ones and I must start limiting my activities.
Therefore, I decided I must resign as a Director of Quintel effective
immediately.

I wish you every success and continued good fortune.

With kind regards,


                                             Sincerely, 

                                             /s/ Vincent Tese
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                 Vincent Tese
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNNY LEE HOWZE, AKA J. L. Howze, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION, public entity, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-56154 

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-04067-SVWRAO 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2019**

Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. 

California state prisoner Johnny Lee Howze, AKA J.L. Howze, appeals pro 

se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging violations of

Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-56154 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 

(9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Howze’s ADA claim for monetary 

damages because Howze failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendant 

intentionally discriminated against him because of his disability. See Duvall v. 

County of Kitsap, 260 F.3d 1124, 1135, 1138-40 (9th Cir. 2001) (discussing 

elements of a Title II claim under the ADA, and the required showing of 

intentional discrimination to state a Title II claim for damages); see also Gonzalez 

v. Planned Parenthood of L.A., 759 F.3d 1112, 1115 (9th Cir. 2014) (the court 

need not accept as true allegations contradicted by documents referenced in the 

complaint); Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz., 609 F.3d 1011, 1022 (9th Cir. 2010) 

(“The ADA prohibits discrimination because of disability, not inadequate 

treatment for disability.”).

Howze’s request for appointment of counsel, set forth in the opening brief, is 

denied. 

Defendant’s motion to revoke Howze’s in forma pauperis status (Docket 

Entry No. 16) is denied. Defendant’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry 
3 18-56154 

No. 17) is denied as unnecessary. 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 38903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15824]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 138 / Thursday, July 22, 2021 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 38903]]


                Notice of July 20, 2021

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Mali

                On July 26, 2019, by Executive Order 13882, the 
                President declared a national emergency pursuant to the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and 
                extraordinary threat to the national security and 
                foreign policy of the United States constituted by the 
                situation in Mali.

                The situation in Mali, including repeated violations of 
                ceasefire arrangements made pursuant to the 2015 
                Agreement on Peace and Reconciliation in Mali; the 
                expansion of terrorist activities into southern and 
                central Mali; the intensification of drug trafficking 
                and trafficking in persons, human rights abuses, and 
                hostage-taking; and the intensification of attacks 
                against civilians, the Malian defense and security 
                forces, the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated 
                Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA), and 
                international security presences, continues to pose an 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security and foreign policy of the United States. For 
                this reason, the national emergency declared on July 
                26, 2019, must continue in effect beyond July 26, 2021. 
                Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 
                National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared 
                in Executive Order 13882 with respect to the situation 
                in Mali.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    July 20, 2021.

[FR Doc. 2021-15824
Filed 7-21-21; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3295-F1-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF ADVANCED GAMING  TECHNOLOGY,  INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND
THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,  EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         265
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    20
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               286
<PP&E>                                         95
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          344
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       125
<OTHER-SE>                                     (733)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   537
<SALES>                                        15
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (338)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (338)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Brian Bonar, certify that:
 
 The undersigned certifies that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Amanda Company, Inc. (the "Company");
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.
   
 Date: January 12, 2004
 /s/ Brian BonarBrian Bonar
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                     Three Months    Three Months
                                        Ended            Ended
                                     September 30,   September 30,
                                         1996            1997
                                     ------------    -------------

Net earnings before income taxes      $  727,867     $  824,351
Pro forma income taxes                   291,147
                                      ----------     ----------

Pro forma net earnings                $  436,720             

Weighted average shares
  outstanding during the period        7,000,000             

Shares issuable under
  consulting agreement                    96,366             

Shares issuable under
  compensation agreement                 170,708             
                                      ----------     ----------
Weighted average common
  and common equivalent shares 
  outstanding during the period        7,267,074      9,620,084
                                      ==========     ==========
Pro forma net earnings per share      $     0.06     $     0.09
                                      ==========     ==========
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas D. Landusky, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered August 25,1983, as amended August 29,1983, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated as a felony, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment, as amended, affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised upon appeal. Counsel is granted leave to withdraw as counsel *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
#### Elizabeth Gonzalez, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

[943 NYS2d 448]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered July 7, 2011, which granted plaintiffs motion to renew and adhered to its prior determinations granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and denying plaintiffs cross motion to apply the doctrine of equitable estoppel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that she was injured when she slipped and fell on an accumulation of snow and ice in a public school parking lot. Under the circumstances, the action was properly dismissed since defendant is not a proper party. The 2002 amendments to the Education Law (L 2002, ch 91), and the alleged public confusion that ensued, do not justify holding defendant liable for plaintiffs injuries *(see Bailey v City of New York,*55 AD3d 426 [2008]; *Perez v City of New York,*41 AD3d 378, 379 [2007], *lv denied*10 NY3d 708 [2008]).

Contrary to plaintiffs argument, the City is not equitably estopped from claiming that it is not a proper party. In its answer, the City specifically denied plaintiffs allegations that it controlled, maintained, or managed the school premises, or had any duty to remove snow and ice from the grounds *(see Flores v City of New York,*62 AD3d 506 [2009]). That denial should have alerted plaintiff that she had sued the wrong party, and, when the City served the answer, plaintiff had adequate time to seek leave to file a late notice of claim naming the correct defendant.

The circumstances of this case can be readily distinguished from those of *Padilla v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y.*(90 AD3d 458 [2011]), which concerned another injury on the grounds of a City public school. In *Padilla,*we held that the doctrine of equitable estoppel barred the City from denying that it was a proper party because its answer did not alert the plaintiff that it lacked control over the school premises, but instead merely objected that the attempted service of the notice of claim was improper (90 AD3d at 458). We also found that, after the notice of claim was filed, the City’s wrongful or negligent actions discouraged the plaintiff from serving a timely amended notice of claim *(id.*at 459).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find *560them unavailing. Concur — Saxe, J.E, Sweeny, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
# C_2020103EN.01000601.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Trgovački sud u Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 18 March 2019 — EOS Matrix d.o.o. v Entazis d.o.o.

(Case C-234/19)

(2020/C 103/07)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Trgovački sud u Zagrebu

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: EOS Matrix d.o.o.

Defendant: Entazis d.o.o.

By order of 6 November 2019, the Court declared that it manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Trgovački sud u Zagrebu (Croatia).

---
**Exhibit
32.1**
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Med-Emerg International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr.
Ramesh Zacharias Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:
  1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
May 13, 2005
 By:
    /s/ Dr. Ramesh ZachariasName: Dr. Ramesh
    ZachariasTitle: Chief Executive
      Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Traffix, Inc and
Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statement as presented in the Company's
Form 10K for the period ended November 30, 2000 and is qualified by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,551,344
<SECURITIES>                                38,676,890
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,354,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                   795,024
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,654,272
<PP&E>                                         512,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                 745,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,804,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,475,499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,680
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,312,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,804,059
<SALES>                                     26,093,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,093,960
<CGS>                                        9,470,275
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,470,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,149,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             286,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,618,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,471,754
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,146,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,146,870
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>