alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:1
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 2 of 22 PageID #:2
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 3 of 22 PageID #:3
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 4 of 22 PageID #:4
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 5 of 22 PageID #:5
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 6 of 22 PageID #:6
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 7 of 22 PageID #:7
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 8 of 22 PageID #:8
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 9 of 22 PageID #:9
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 10 of 22 PageID #:10
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 11 of 22 PageID #:11
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 12 of 22 PageID #:12
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 13 of 22 PageID #:13
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 14 of 22 PageID #:14
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 15 of 22 PageID #:15
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 16 of 22 PageID #:16
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 17 of 22 PageID #:17
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 18 of 22 PageID #:18
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 19 of 22 PageID #:19
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 20 of 22 PageID #:20
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 21 of 22 PageID #:21
Case: 1:02-cv-00562 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/02 Page 22 of 22 PageID #:22
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 139 (Friday, July 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 39102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15675]



[[Page 39102]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of 
countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation 
with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott 
(within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).

Iraq
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
Yemen

Kevin Nichols,
International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2021-15675 Filed 7-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P
#### THE STATE EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL V. FOSTER, JUDGE.

*Mandamus.*

(Decided Nov. 14, 1907.)

Original petition in the Supreme Court.

Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, and O. B. Verner, for petitioner.

H. B. Foster, pro se.

Per curiam.

Rule nisi discharged.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Louis Prichard, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kentucky Bancshares,
Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.
Date:   March 30, 2007
BY  /s/ Louis Prichard
Louis Prichard
President & Chief Executive Officer
92
99
# C_2019093EN.01007302.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/73

---

Action brought on 15 January 2019 — Idea Groupe v EUIPO — The Logistical Approach (Idealogistic Verhoeven Greatest care in getting it there)

(Case T-29/19)

(2019/C 93/95)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Idea Groupe (Montoir de Bretagne, France) (represented by: P. Langlais, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Logistical Approach BV (Uden, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark Idealogistic Verhoeven Greatest care in getting it there in the colours black, white and shades of blue — Application for registration No 14 567 184

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 November 2018 in Case R 2064/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs;

| — | order the company The Logistical Approach B.V to pay the costs occasioned by its intervention, should it intervene. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the company The Logistical Approach B.V to pay the costs occasioned by its intervention, should it intervene.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
#### Robert Eller, Respondent, v Hyala Eller, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress, in which defendant presented several counterclaims, defendant appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County: (1) the first dated May 23, 1984 (Shaw, J.), granting plaintiff’s motion to vacate a default *618judgment entered against him on the counterclaims and placing the matter on the Ready Day Calendar for June 18, 1984 and (2) the second dated June 22, 1984 (Lodato, J.), dismissing defendant’s counterclaims upon her failure to proceed to trial.

Order dated May 23, 1984 affirmed.

Appeal from the order dated June 22, 1984 dismissed.

Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The decision of whether or not to vacate the default judgment was within the sound discretion of the trial court. We are not inclined to disturb it. Following a hearing, the trial court concluded that plaintiff had never acquired any knowledge of the pendency of counterclaims. Moreover, numerous questions about the merits of defendant’s counterclaims were raised in the papers and at the hearing. Thus, under all the circumstances, the trial court correctly ordered a disposition on the merits and defendant’s claim that the May 23 order was an abuse of discretion is without merit.

Furthermore, defendant’s failure to proceed to trial on the counterclaims, after vacatur of plaintiff’s default, constituted a default and it is well settled that no appeal lies from an order entered upon such a default *(see, First Natl. Bank & Trust Co. v Classic Collateral Corp.,*44 AD2d 868; CPLR 5511). The proper remedy is to move in the court of original jurisdiction, on notice, to vacate the default and, if the motion is denied, to appeal from the order denying it *(see,*Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C5511:1, p 105; *First Natl. Bank & Trust Co. v Classic Collateral Corp., supra).*Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 48 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 48

    Disapproving the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service 
          relating to the health insurance premium tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2012

  Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin introduced the following joint resolution; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service 
          relating to the health insurance premium tax credit.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to the health 
insurance premium tax credit (published at 77 Fed. Reg. 30377 
(Wednesday, May 23, 2012)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



         Pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, the undersigned officer of Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that:

         (1)      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
                  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  November 5, 2002


                                /s/ Steven A. Schmidt
                                ----------------------------------------------
                                Name:  Steven A. Schmidt
                                Title:  Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
                                Vice President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LEONARD J. GITTER,

Respondent

v.

ELENA BELOGOLOVSKY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 150 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         360,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,641,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,587,358
<INVENTORY>                                  5,301,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,303,392
<PP&E>                                      15,220,817
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,915,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,367,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,175,445
<BONDS>                                      3,539,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,844,881
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,192,808)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,367,444
<SALES>                                     27,254,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,254,782
<CGS>                                       18,998,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,575,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (483,330)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             927,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                236,153
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            236,153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   236,153
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 63 6- CR I vy B e nn e tt NE WTO N , Appellant
v . The STA TE of Texas, Appellee Fr om the 175th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CR-0930 Honora ble Mary Román J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: November 11, 2009 DI SMI SSED Appellant I

vy Be nnett Newton plea ded nolo co n t en d er e t o “d ea d l y co n d u ct -f i re ar m ” p u rs u ant to a plea ba

rg ain ag ree ment. As p art of his plea -bar g ain, appe llant signe d a sepa rate “Waiver of Ap pe a l.” Th e tr ia l c ou rt imp os e d se nte nc e a nd sig ne d a c e rt if ic a te statin g tha

t th is “ is a ple a -b a rg a in
case , and the defe ndant has NO rig ht of appea l.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5. 2( a )( 2) . App e lla nt t ime ly filed a notice of appe al. The clerk’s recor d, which includes the pl ea barg ain agr eeme nt and the trial04
- 09
- 00 63 6- CR

- 2- court’s Rule 25.2(a) (2) certification, has been filed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). Th is c ou rt mus t dismiss an appea l “if a

cer tification that shows the def endant ha s the rig ht of appe al has not bee n made pa rt of the r ecor d.” Id. The c ourt g ave a

ppellant notice that the a

ppeal would be dismiss ed unless an amende d trial
c ou rt c e rt if ic a tio n s ho wi ng he ha s the ri g ht to a pp e a l we re ma de pa

rt of the a pp e lla te re c or d w ith in thirty day s. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5. 2( d) ; 37 .1 ; Dan iel s v . S tat e , 110 S.W .3d 174 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2003, order) , dis

p. on me rit

s , No. 04 -0 3- 00 17 6- CR, 20 03 WL 21 50 83 47 (Jul y 2, 20 03 , p e t. ref ’d) ( n o t d es i g nated f

or publication). Appe llant’s appointed appe llate counse l filed a wr itten response , stating she has reviewed the rec ord and can find no rig ht of appeal. After revie wing the
rec ord and counsel’s notice , we a g ree that appellant doe s not have a rig ht to appeal. See Dears v. Sta te , 154 S.W .3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding tha t court of a ppeals should re view cle rk’s
re c or d to de te rm ine wh e the r t ri a l c ou rt ’s c e rt if

ic a tio n is ac c ur a te ). We t

he re fo re dis mis s th is a

pp e a l. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).

PER C URI AM Do no t pu bli sh
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11.1

                         INTERNATIONAL COMPUTEX, INC.

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                             Three Months ended March 31,
                                                  1997          1998
                                              -----------    ----------  
<S>                                          <C>            <C> 
Pro forma net income                            172,505         65,513
                                              ===========    ==========  


Weighted average number
 of common and common
 equivalent shares:

 
 Weighted average common
  shares outstanding                          2,125,000      3,440,590
 
 Shares issued from assumed exercise
  of common stock equivalents (1)               232,836        225,438
                                              -----------    ----------  
 
Weighted average number
 of common and common  equivalent
 shares outstanding                           2,357,836      3,666,028
                                              ===========    ==========  

Earnings per share:
     Basic                                   $      .08     $      .02
                                              ===========    ==========  
     Diluted:                                $      .07     $      .02
                                              ===========    ==========  
</TABLE> 

(1)  Shares issued from assumed exercise of common stock equivalents include the
     number of incremental shares which would result from applying the treasury
     stock method.

                                      14
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION:


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Principal Financial Officer

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Sentry Technology Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Joan E.
Miller, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
18  U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that,  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


                                    /s/ JOAN E. MILLER
                                    ------------------------------

                                    Joan E. Miller
                                    Vice President -Finance and Treasurer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

                                    August 14, 2007


A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of  this     written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained  by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.

This  certification  accompanies  this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and shall not, except to the extent
required  by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  (the "Exchange Act").  Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent  that  the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it  by  reference.
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487


Exhibit 4.1


 


 



THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


July 22, 2021


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 526 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon
is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in the Registration
Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on July 21, 2021, in accordance with the valuation method set
forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York
Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-255289) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an
exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President