Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R . 4 7. 5, thecourt has determined that this opinionshould not be * publishe d and is not prece dent except under the limite d circumstances set forthin5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 10395 Su m m ar y Cal endar ROBERT M AY , Pl ai nt i f f - Appe l l ant v. N O R T H T E XA S S T A T E H O S P IT A L , e t a l., D efen da n t s - A pp el l ees

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he N or t her n D i st r i c tof Texas U SD C N o. 7: 08- c v- 25 B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , C L E M E N T , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * R o b e r t M a y , pro se , appeal s t he di sm i ss alof hi s 42 U . S. C . § 1983 c o m p l a i n t . We A F F I R M. O n M a r c h 5 , 2 0 0 8 , Ro b e r tM a yf il e dac iv i lr i g h t s c o m p l a i n ta s s e r t i ng vari ou s c l ai m s agai n stN ort h T exas S t ate H o s pit ala nd s e ve r alo t h er defen da n t s. A t th e t i m e th i s com p l a i n t w a s fil ed , M a y w a s a p sy ch i a tri c p a ti en t a t N o rth T e x a s S ta te H o s p ita l. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 29, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 10395

- 2- O n N ove m ber7, 2008 , a l lb u tone of M ay’ s c l ai m s w er e di sm i ss ed as f r ivol ous purs uant t o 28 U . S. C . § 1915( e) ( 2) ( B ) (i) . I n hi s r em ai ni ng c l ai m , M ay c o n te n d e dth a t h e w a s u n la w fu llyfo r c e dto ta k e p s y c h ia tr icm e d ic a tio n w h ile c onf i ne da tNor t h Te x a s St a t e H o s p i t a l . He s o ughtd a m a g e s a ndi nj un c t ive rel i ef i n t h e f

orm of hi s i m m edi ate r el ease as w el las t h e cl osure of the en t i re faci l i t y. Th i s c l ai m w as subseq u en t l y di sm i ssed f or fai l i n g t o st ate a c l ai m up on w h ic h re lie f m a yb e g r a n te d . S ee 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 (e)(2 )(B )(ii). B ec aus eM a yi s pr oc ee di ng pro se , hi s pl e ad i ngs w i l lb e l ibe r all y c o ns t r ue d. Se eEr i c ks o n v . Par dus , 55 1 U . S . 89 , 94 ( 2 0 0 7 ). M a y’ s req u est for i m m ed i a te rel ease w as m oot ed w h en he w as rel eased f rom t h e hosp i t ali n Ju l y 200 8. E ven w i t h a ge ner ous r eadi ng, t he o nl y r em ai ni ng c l ai m i s aga i n st th e N or t h T exas St at e H o s pi t alf

o rf o r c i ng hi m t o t ak e ps yc hi at r i c m e di c at i o n. We r e v i e w ad i s mi s s a lp u r s u a n tt o S e c t i o n 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) (b ) (i i) u s i n gt h e s a me deno v o s t a n d a r da p p lic a b le to d is m is s a ls p u r s u a n t t o F e d e r a l R u le o f C iv il P r o c e d u r e 1 2 (b )(6 ). Har r i s v . Hegm ann , 1 9 8 F .3 d1 5 3 , 1 5 6 (5 th C ir . 1 9 9 9 ). W e w i l lconsi der t h e pl ai n t i f f ’ s al l egati on s t o be tr u e , th en af f i rm onl y i f

no rel i ef c o u ldb e g r a n te do n th e fa c ts a lle g e d . I d. N ort h T exa s S ta te H ospi t ali s a divi si on of t h e T exas D epa rt m en tof M e n ta l H e a lth a n dM e n ta l R e ta r d a tio n . S ee T EX . H E ALT H & S A F E TY C ODE § 5 3 2 . 0 0 1 (b)( 8 ). Iti s th ere fore a state a ge n c yf or th e p u rp ose of E l ev en th A m e n d m e n t im m u n ity . Se eSe s s i o n sv . Rus k St at eHo s pi t al , 648 F. 2d 1066, 1069 ( 5t h Ci r . 19 81 ) (ho l di ng t hatRus k St at e H o s pi t al , e xc l us ive l y c o nt r o l l e d b y t he sa m e T e x a s d e p a rtm e n t, w a s a st ate agency f o r E lev e n th A m e n d m e n t p u rp o se s). Abs e nta n e xp r e s s w aive r , t he El e ve nt h Am e ndm e ntpr e c l ude s s ui t s i n whi c h a s ta te a g e n c yis n a m e da s ad e fe n d a n t. Pennh urs tSt at eSch. & Hos p. v.N o. 09- 10395

- 3- Halde r m an , 465 U . S. 89, 100 ( 1984) . Therei s no s ugges t i on th a t T exas has w aivedi t s E l even t h A m en dm en ti m m u n i t y i n t h i s c ase. T h e r e is an a r r o w e x c e p tio n to E le v e n th A m e n d m e n t im m u n ity . Se eEx Par t eYou ng , 2 09 U . S . 123 ( 190 8) . I tapp l i es t o sui t s t h at al l ege a vi ol ati on of fede r all aw t hatar e “br oughtagai nsti ndivi dualper so ns i n t hei rof f i c i al capa ci t i es as agents of t h e st ate, an d the rel i ef sough tm u st b e d e cla rat ory or i nj u n ctive i n n a tu re a n dpr osp ective in effect. ” Ag u i la rv . T e x . De p ’ tof C r i m. Ju st i ce , 1 6 0 F .3 d1 0 5 2 , 1 0 5 4 (5 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ). T h e di st ri ctcourthel d that t h e Ex Par t eYou ng e x c e p tio n w a s in a p p lic a b le becau se M ay di d n otseek p rospect ive i nj u n ct ive rel i ef fr om a n y i n divi du alsued in a n o ffic ia l ca p a c ity . M a ya r g u e s th e d is tr ic t c o u r t m u s t n o t h a v e re a dh is response to t h e m ot i on t o di sm i ss i n w h i ch h e n a m e d tw o p sychi atr i st s, D r. S h ir r o a n dD r . S o lv e n , a s th e in d iv id u a ls w h o p r e s c r ib e do ra d m in is t e r e dh is p s y c h ia tr ic m e d ic a tio n . H o w e v e r , n e ith e rin d iv id u a l is n a m e da s ad e fe n d a n t in t h e c o mp l a i n t , a n dMa yh a s n o ta me n d e dh i s c o mp l a i n tt o a d d e i t h e ro f t h e m. T h eref ore, t h e Ex Par t eYou nge x c e p tio n d o e s n o t a p p ly . S i n ce i m m u n i t y h as not been w aivedan d the Ex Part eYoung excepti on do e s no ta pply, t he di s t r i c tc o ur tc o r r e c t l y he l d t hatt he El e ven t h Am e ndm e nt p r e c lu d e d M a y ’ s S e c tio n 1 9 8 3 c la im a g a in s t N o r th T e x a s S ta te H o s p i t a l. Ac c o r d i n g l y , t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r t ’ s d i s mi s s a lo f th i s c l a i m i s A F F I RMED.