# Official Journal C 83/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.083.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 83 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 527 April 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.083.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 83

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 527 April 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 083/01 | Communication from the commission — Temporary Community framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis | 1 |
| 2009/C 083/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 16 |
| 2009/C 083/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5289 — Agusta/CAE/Rotorsim) (
  1
  ) | 17 |
| 2009/C 083/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4993 — EDF/EnBW/Kogeneracja) (
  1
  ) | 17 |
| 2009/C 083/05 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4998 — EDF/EnBW/ERSA) (
  1
  ) | 18 |
| 2009/C 083/06 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5232 — WPP/TNS) (
  1
  ) | 18 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 083/01

Communication from the commission — Temporary Community framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis

1

2009/C 083/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

16

2009/C 083/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5289 — Agusta/CAE/Rotorsim) (
  1
  )

1

17

2009/C 083/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4993 — EDF/EnBW/Kogeneracja) (
  1
  )

1

17

2009/C 083/05

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4998 — EDF/EnBW/ERSA) (
  1
  )

1

18

2009/C 083/06

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5232 — WPP/TNS) (
  1
  )

1

18

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Council |
| 2009/C 083/07 | Council Decision of 30 March 2009 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers | 19 |
| 2009/C 083/08 | Council Decision of 30 March 2009 appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training | 24 |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 083/09 | Euro exchange rates | 25 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Council

2009/C 083/07

Council Decision of 30 March 2009 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers

19

2009/C 083/08

Council Decision of 30 March 2009 appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

24

Commission

2009/C 083/09

Euro exchange rates

25

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 083/10 | Call for proposals — DG ENTR No ENT/ERA/09/311 — Erasmus for young entrepreneurs | 26 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 083/11 | Decision taken by Serbia to implement unilaterally the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the Republic of Serbia | 28 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 083/12 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5473 — Fincantieri/ABB/JV) (
  1
  ) | 29 |
| 2009/C 083/13 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5499 — IPIC/NOVA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 30 |
| 2009/C 083/14 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5488 — Magna/Cadence Innovation) (
  1
  ) | 31 |
| 2009/C 083/15 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5483 — Toshiba/Fujitsu HDD Business) (
  1
  ) | 32 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2009/C 083/10

Call for proposals — DG ENTR No ENT/ERA/09/311 — Erasmus for young entrepreneurs

26

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

Commission

2009/C 083/11

Decision taken by Serbia to implement unilaterally the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the Republic of Serbia

28

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2009/C 083/12

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5473 — Fincantieri/ABB/JV) (
  1
  )

1

29

2009/C 083/13

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5499 — IPIC/NOVA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

30

2009/C 083/14

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5488 — Magna/Cadence Innovation) (
  1
  )

1

31

2009/C 083/15

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5483 — Toshiba/Fujitsu HDD Business) (
  1
  )

1

32

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

II Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/1

---

Communication from the commission — Temporary Community framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis

2009/C 83/01

1.   THE FINANCIAL CRISIS, ITS IMPACT ON THE REAL ECONOMY AND THE NEED FOR TEMPORARY MEASURES

1.1.   The financial crisis and its impact on the real economy

On 26 November 2008 the Commission adopted the Communication ‘A European Economic Recovery Plan’ (1) (‘the Recovery Plan’) to drive Europe’s recovery from the current financial crisis. The Recovery Plan is based on two mutually reinforcing main elements. Firstly, short-term measures to boost demand, save jobs and help restore confidence and, secondly, ‘smart investment’ to yield higher growth and sustainable prosperity in the longer term. The Recovery Plan will intensify and accelerate reforms already underway under the Lisbon Strategy.

In this context, the challenge for the Community is avoiding public intervention which would undermine the objective of less and better targeted State aid. Nevertheless, under certain conditions, there is a need for new temporary State aid.

The Recovery Plan also includes further initiatives to apply State aid rules in a way that achieves maximum flexibility for tackling the crisis while maintaining a level playing field and avoiding undue restrictions of competition. This Communication gives details of a number of additional temporary openings for Member States to grant State aid.

First, the financial crisis has a hard impact on the banking sector in the Community. The Council has stressed that, although public intervention has to be decided at national level, this needs to be done within a coordinated framework and on the basis of a number of common Community principles (2). The Commission reacted immediately with various measures including the adoption of the Communication on the application of State aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions in the context of the current global financial crisis (3) and of a number of decisions authorising rescue aid to financial institutions.

Sufficient and affordable access to finance is a precondition for investment, growth and job creation by the private sector. Member States need to use the leverage they have acquired as a result of providing substantial financial support to the banking sector to ensure that this support does not lead merely to an improvement in the financial situation of the banks without any benefit to the economy at large. Support for the financial sector should therefore be well targeted to guarantee that banks resume their normal lending activities. The Commission will take this into account when reviewing State aid to banks.

While the situation on financial markets appears to be improving, the full impact of the financial crisis on the real economy is now being felt. A very serious downturn is affecting the wider economy and hitting households, businesses and jobs. In particular, as a consequence of the crisis on financial markets, banks are deleveraging and becoming much more risk-averse than in previous years, leading to a credit squeeze. This financial crisis could trigger credit rationing, a drop in demand and recession.

Such difficulties could affect not only weak companies without solvency buffers, but also healthy companies which will find themselves facing a sudden shortage or even unavailability of credit. This will be particularly true for small and medium-sized undertakings (‘SMEs’), which in any event face greater difficulties with access to finance than larger companies. This situation could not only seriously affect the economic situation of many healthy companies and their employees in the short and medium term but also have longer-lasting negative effects since all Community investments in the future – in particular, towards sustainable growth and other objectives of the Lisbon Strategy – could be delayed or even abandoned.

1.2.   The need for close European coordination of national aid measures

In the current financial situation, Member States could be tempted to go it alone and, in particular, to wage a subsidy race to support their companies. Past experience shows that individual action of this kind cannot be effective and could seriously damage the internal market. When granting support, taking fully into consideration the current specific economic situation, it is crucial to ensure a level playing field for European companies and to avoid Member States engaging in subsidy races which would be unsustainable and detrimental to the Community as a whole. Competition policy is there to ensure this.

1.3.   The need for temporary State aid measures

While State aid is no miracle cure to the current difficulties, well targeted public support for companies could be a helpful component in the overall effort both to unblock lending to companies and to encourage continued investment in a low-carbon future.

The temporary additional measures provided for in this Communication pursue two objectives: first, in the light of the exceptional and transitory financing problems linked to the banking crisis, to unblock bank lending to companies and thereby guarantee continuity in their access to finance. As borne out by the recently adopted Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘Think Small First’ – A ‘Small Business Act’ for Europe of 25 June 2008 (4), SMEs are particularly important for the whole economy in Europe and improving their financial situation will also have positive effects for large companies, thereby supporting overall economic growth and modernisation in the longer term.

The second objective is to encourage companies to continue investing in the future, in particular in a sustainable growth economy. There could indeed possibly be dramatic consequences if, as a result of the current crisis, the significant progress that has been achieved in the environmental field were to be halted or even reversed. For this reason, it is necessary to provide temporary support to companies for investing in environmental projects (which could, inter alia, give a technological edge to Community industry), thereby combining urgent and necessary financial support with long-term benefits for Europe.

This Communication first recalls the manifold opportunities for public support which are already at the disposal of Member States under existing State aid rules, before setting out additional State aid measures that Member States may grant temporarily in order to remedy the difficulties which some companies are currently encountering with access to finance and to promote investment pursuing environmental objectives.

The Commission considers that the proposed aid instruments are the most appropriate ones to achieve those objectives.

2.   GENERAL ECONOMIC POLICY MEASURES

The Recovery Plan was adopted in response to the current economic situation. Given the scale of the crisis, the Community needs a coordinated approach, big enough and bold enough to restore consumer and business confidence.

The strategic aims of the Recovery Plan are to:

| — | swiftly stimulate demand and boost consumer confidence; |
| --- | --- |

—

swiftly stimulate demand and boost consumer confidence;

| — | lessen the human cost of the economic downturn and its impact on the most vulnerable. Many workers and their families are or will be hit by the crisis. Action can be taken to help stem the loss of jobs and then to help people return rapidly to the labour market, rather than face long-term unemployment; |
| --- | --- |

—

lessen the human cost of the economic downturn and its impact on the most vulnerable. Many workers and their families are or will be hit by the crisis. Action can be taken to help stem the loss of jobs and then to help people return rapidly to the labour market, rather than face long-term unemployment;

| — | help Europe to prepare to capitalise when growth returns, so that the European economy is in tune with the demands for competitiveness and sustainability and the needs of the future, as outlined in the Lisbon Strategy. That means supporting innovation, building a knowledge economy and speeding up the shift towards a low-carbon and resource-efficient economy. |
| --- | --- |

—

help Europe to prepare to capitalise when growth returns, so that the European economy is in tune with the demands for competitiveness and sustainability and the needs of the future, as outlined in the Lisbon Strategy. That means supporting innovation, building a knowledge economy and speeding up the shift towards a low-carbon and resource-efficient economy.

To achieve those objectives, Member States already have at their disposal a number of instruments which are not considered State aid. For instance, some companies may be experiencing even more acute difficulties with access to finance than others, thereby delaying or even scuppering the financing necessary for their growth and for seeing through investments envisaged. For this purpose, Member States could adopt a series of general policy measures, applicable to all companies on their territories and, consequently, falling outside the State aid rules, with the aim of temporarily alleviating financing problems in the short and medium term. For example, payment deadlines for social security and similar charges, or even taxes could be extended or measures for employees could be introduced. If such measures are open to all undertakings, in principle they do not constitute State aid.

Member States may also grant financial support directly to consumers, for instance for scrapping old products and/or buying green products. If such aid is granted without discrimination based on the origin of the product, it does not constitute State aid.

Moreover, general Community programmes, like the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013) established by Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 (5) and the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) established by Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 (6) may be used to best effect to deliver support to SMEs, but also to large undertakings. This is fully in line with other European initiatives, such as the European Investment Bank’s decision to mobilise EUR 30 billion to support European SMEs and its commitment to step up its ability to intervene in infrastructure projects.

3.   STATE AID POSSIBLE UNDER EXISTING INSTRUMENTS

Over the last few years, the Commission has significantly modernised the State aid rules in order to encourage Member States to target public support better on sustainable investments, thus contributing to the Lisbon Strategy. In this context, particular emphasis has been given to SMEs, accompanied by more openings for granting State aid. In addition, the State aid rules have been greatly simplified and streamlined by Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation) (7) (‘the GBER’) which now offers Member States a wide panoply of aid measures with minimum administrative burden. In the current economic situation, the following existing State aid instruments are of particular importance:

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to de minimis aid (8) (‘the de minimis Regulation’) specifies that support measures worth up to EUR 200 000 per company over any three-year period do not constitute State aid within the meaning of the Treaty. The same Regulation also states that guarantees of up to EUR 1,5 million do not exceed the de minimis threshold and therefore do not constitute aid. Consequently, Member States can grant such guarantees without calculation of the corresponding aid equivalent and without administrative burdens.

The GBER forms a central element of the State aid rules by simplifying the State aid procedure for certain important aid measures and fostering redirection of State aid to priority Community objectives. All previously existing block exemptions, along with new areas (innovation, environment, research and development for large companies and risk capital measures for SMEs), have been brought under a single instrument. In all the cases covered by the GBER, Member States can grant aid without prior notification to the Commission. Therefore, the speed of the process lies fully in the hands of Member States. The GBER is particularly important for SMEs, in that it provides for special rules on investment and employment aid exclusively for SMEs. In addition, all the 26 measures covered are open to SMEs, allowing Member States to accompany SMEs during the different stages in their development, assisting them in areas ranging from access to finance to research and development, innovation, training, employment, environmental measures, etc.

New Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection (9) were adopted as part of the Energy and Climate Change Package at the beginning of 2008. Under those guidelines, Member States may grant State aid, inter alia, as follows:

| — | aid for companies which improve their environmental performance beyond Community standards, or in the absence of Community standards, of up to 70 % of the extra investment costs (up to 80 % in the field of eco-innovation) for small undertakings and of up to 100 % of the extra investment costs if the aid is granted following a genuinely competitive bidding process, even for large companies; aid for early adaptation to future Community standards and aid for environmental studies is also allowed; |
| --- | --- |

—

aid for companies which improve their environmental performance beyond Community standards, or in the absence of Community standards, of up to 70 % of the extra investment costs (up to 80 % in the field of eco-innovation) for small undertakings and of up to 100 % of the extra investment costs if the aid is granted following a genuinely competitive bidding process, even for large companies; aid for early adaptation to future Community standards and aid for environmental studies is also allowed;

| — | in the field of renewable energies and cogeneration, Member States may grant operating aid to cover all extra production costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the field of renewable energies and cogeneration, Member States may grant operating aid to cover all extra production costs;

| — | in order to attain environmental targets for energy saving and for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, Member States may grant aid enabling undertakings to achieve energy savings and aid for renewable energy sources and cogeneration of up to 80 % of the extra investment costs for small undertakings and of up to 100 % of the extra investment costs if the aid is granted following a genuinely competitive bidding process. |
| --- | --- |

—

in order to attain environmental targets for energy saving and for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, Member States may grant aid enabling undertakings to achieve energy savings and aid for renewable energy sources and cogeneration of up to 80 % of the extra investment costs for small undertakings and of up to 100 % of the extra investment costs if the aid is granted following a genuinely competitive bidding process.

In December 2006, the Commission adopted a new Community framework for State aid for research and development and innovation (10). That text contains new provisions on innovation, specially targeted at SMEs and also corresponding to better targeting of aid on job and growth creation along the lines set out in the Lisbon Strategy. In particular Member States may grant State aid, inter alia, as follows:

| — | aid for R&D projects, in particular aid for fundamental research, of up to 100 % of the eligible costs and aid for industrial research of up to 80 % for small enterprises; |
| --- | --- |

—

aid for R&D projects, in particular aid for fundamental research, of up to 100 % of the eligible costs and aid for industrial research of up to 80 % for small enterprises;

| — | aid for young innovative enterprises of up to EUR 1 million and even more in assisted regions, aid for innovation clusters, aid for innovation advisory services and aid for innovation support services; |
| --- | --- |

—

aid for young innovative enterprises of up to EUR 1 million and even more in assisted regions, aid for innovation clusters, aid for innovation advisory services and aid for innovation support services;

| — | aid for the loan of highly qualified personnel, aid for technical feasibility studies, aid for process and organisational innovation in services and aid for industrial property rights costs for SMEs. |
| --- | --- |

—

aid for the loan of highly qualified personnel, aid for technical feasibility studies, aid for process and organisational innovation in services and aid for industrial property rights costs for SMEs.

Training is another key element for competitiveness. It is critically important to maintain investment in training, even at a time of rising unemployment, in order to develop new skills. Under the GBER, Member States may grant both general and specific training aid to companies totalling up to 80 % of the eligible costs.

In 2008, the Commission adopted a new Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (11), which specifies the conditions under which public guarantees for loans do not constitute State aid. In accordance with that Notice, guarantees are not considered State aid, in particular, when a market price is paid for them. Besides clarifying the conditions which determine whether or not aid in the form of guarantees is present, the Notice also introduces, for the first time, specific safe-harbour premiums for SMEs, allowing easier but safe use of guarantees in order to foster the financing of SMEs.

New Community guidelines on State aid to promote risk capital investments in small and medium-sized enterprises (12) were adopted by the Commission in July 2006. They are aimed at innovative and fast-growing SMEs – a key focus of the Lisbon Strategy. The Commission put in place a new safe-harbour threshold of EUR 1,5 million per target SME, a 50 % increase. Beneath that ceiling the Commission accepts that, as a rule, alternative means of funding from financial markets are lacking (that is to say, that a market failure exists). In addition, aid for risk capital has been included in the GBER.

In disadvantaged regions, Member States can grant investment aid for setting up a new establishment, extending an existing establishment or diversifying into new products under the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 (13), which have applied since January 2007.

The Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 also introduce a new form of aid to provide incentives to support business start-ups and the early-stage development of small enterprises in assisted areas.

Under the existing Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (14), Member States can also grant aid to companies requiring public support. For that purpose, Member States may notify rescue and/or restructuring aid schemes for SMEs.

On the basis of the existing State aid possible, the Commission has already authorised a large number of schemes that Member States may use to respond to the current financial situation.

4.   APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE 87(3)(B)

4.1.   General principles

Pursuant to Article 87(3)(b) of the Treaty the Commission may declare compatible with the common market aid ‘to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State’. In this context, the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ruled that the disturbance must affect the whole of the economy of the Member State concerned, and not merely that of one of its regions or parts of its territory. This, moreover, is in line with the need to interpret strictly any derogating provision such as Article 87(3)(b) of the Treaty (15).

This strict interpretation has been consistently applied by the Commission (16) in its decision-making.

In this context, the Commission considers that, beyond emergency support for the financial system, the current global crisis requires exceptional policy responses.

All Member States will be affected by this crisis, albeit in different ways and to different degrees, and it is likely that unemployment will increase, demand fall and fiscal positions deteriorate.

In the light of the seriousness of the current financial crisis and its impact on the overall economy of the Member States, the Commission considers that certain categories of State aid are justified, for a limited period, to remedy those difficulties and that they may be declared compatible with the common market on the basis of Article 87(3)(b) of the Treaty.

Therefore Member States have to show that the State aid measures notified to the Commission under this framework are necessary, appropriate and proportionate to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State and that all the conditions are fully respected.

4.2.   Compatible limited amount of aid

4.2.1.   Existing framework

Article 2 of the de minimis Regulation, states that:

‘Aid measures shall be deemed not to meet all the criteria of Article 87(1) of the Treaty and shall therefore be exempt from the notification requirement of Article 88(3) of the Treaty, if they fulfil the conditions laid down in paragraphs 2 to 5 of this Article.

The total de minimis aid granted to any one undertaking shall not exceed EUR 200 000 over any period of three fiscal years. The total de minimis aid granted to any one undertaking active in the road transport sector shall not exceed EUR 100 000 over any period of three fiscal years. These ceilings shall apply irrespective of the form of the de minimis aid or the objective pursued and regardless of whether the aid granted by the Member State is financed entirely or partly by resources of Community origin. The period shall be determined by reference to the fiscal years used by the undertaking in the Member State concerned.’

4.2.2.   New measure

New measure

The financial crisis is affecting not only structurally weak companies but also companies which will find themselves facing a sudden shortage or even unavailability of credit. An improvement in the financial situation of those companies will have positive effects for the whole European economy.

Therefore, in view of the current economic situation, it is considered necessary to temporarily allow the granting of a limited amount of aid that will nevertheless fall within the scope of Article 87(1) of the Treaty, since it exceeds the threshold indicated in the de minimis Regulation.

de minimis

The Commission will consider such State aid compatible with the common market on the basis of Article 87(3)(b) of the Treaty, provided all the following conditions are met:

| (a) | the aid does not exceed a cash grant of EUR 500 000 per undertaking; all figures used must be gross, that is, before any deduction of tax or other charge; where aid is awarded in a form other than a grant, the aid amount is the gross grant equivalent of the aid; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the aid does not exceed a cash grant of EUR 500 000 per undertaking; all figures used must be gross, that is, before any deduction of tax or other charge; where aid is awarded in a form other than a grant, the aid amount is the gross grant equivalent of the aid;

| (b) | the aid is granted in the form of a scheme; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the aid is granted in the form of a scheme;

| (c) | the aid is granted to firms which were not in difficulty (17) on 1 July 2008; it may be granted to firms that were not in difficulty at that date but entered in difficulty thereafter as a result of the global financial and economic crisis; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the aid is granted to firms which were not in difficulty (17) on 1 July 2008; it may be granted to firms that were not in difficulty at that date but entered in difficulty thereafter as a result of the global financial and economic crisis;

17

| (d) | the aid scheme does not apply to firms active in the fisheries sector; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the aid scheme does not apply to firms active in the fisheries sector;

| (e) | the aid is not export aid or aid favouring domestic over imported products; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

the aid is not export aid or aid favouring domestic over imported products;

| (f) | the aid is granted no later than 31 December 2010; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

the aid is granted no later than 31 December 2010;

| (g) | prior to granting the aid, the Member State obtains a declaration from the undertaking concerned, in written or electronic form, about any other de minimis aid and aid pursuant to this measure received during the current fiscal year and checks that the aid will not raise the total amount of aid received by the undertaking during the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2010, to a level above the ceiling of EUR 500 000; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

prior to granting the aid, the Member State obtains a declaration from the undertaking concerned, in written or electronic form, about any other de minimis aid and aid pursuant to this measure received during the current fiscal year and checks that the aid will not raise the total amount of aid received by the undertaking during the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2010, to a level above the ceiling of EUR 500 000;

de minimis

| (h) | the aid scheme does not apply to undertakings active in the primary production of agricultural products (18); it may apply to undertakings active in the processing and marketing of agricultural products (19) unless the amount of the aid is fixed on the basis of the price or quantity of such products purchased from primary producers or put on the market by the undertakings concerned, or the aid is conditional on being partly or entirely passed on to primary producers. |
| --- | --- |

(h)

the aid scheme does not apply to undertakings active in the primary production of agricultural products (18); it may apply to undertakings active in the processing and marketing of agricultural products (19) unless the amount of the aid is fixed on the basis of the price or quantity of such products purchased from primary producers or put on the market by the undertakings concerned, or the aid is conditional on being partly or entirely passed on to primary producers.

18

19

4.3.   Aid in the form of guarantees

Aid in the form of guarantees

4.3.1.   Existing framework

Existing framework

The Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees is intended to give Member States detailed guidance about the principles on which the Commission intends to base its interpretation of Articles 87 and 88 and application thereof to State guarantees. In particular, the Notice specifies the conditions under which State aid can be considered not to be present. It does not provide compatibility criteria for assessment of guarantees.

4.3.2.   New measure

New measure

In order further to encourage access to finance and to reduce the current high risk aversion on the part of banks, subsidised loan guarantees for a limited period can be an appropriate and well targeted solution to give firms easier access to finance.

The Commission will consider such State aid compatible with the common market on the basis of Article 87(3)(b) of the Treaty, provided all the following conditions are met:

| (a) | for SMEs, Member States grant a reduction of up to 25 % of the annual premium to be paid for new guarantees granted in accordance with the safe-harbour provisions as set out in the Annex (20); |
| --- | --- |

(a)

for SMEs, Member States grant a reduction of up to 25 % of the annual premium to be paid for new guarantees granted in accordance with the safe-harbour provisions as set out in the Annex (20);

20

| (b) | for large companies, Member States also grant a reduction of up to 15 % of the annual premium for new guarantees calculated on the basis of the same safe-harbour provisions set out in the Annex; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

for large companies, Member States also grant a reduction of up to 15 % of the annual premium for new guarantees calculated on the basis of the same safe-harbour provisions set out in the Annex;

| (c) | when the aid element in guarantee schemes is calculated through methodologies already accepted by the Commission following their notification under a regulation adopted by the Commission in the field of State aid (21), Member States may also grant a similar reduction of up to 25 % of the annual premium to be paid for new guarantees for SMEs and up to 15 % for large companies; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

when the aid element in guarantee schemes is calculated through methodologies already accepted by the Commission following their notification under a regulation adopted by the Commission in the field of State aid (21), Member States may also grant a similar reduction of up to 25 % of the annual premium to be paid for new guarantees for SMEs and up to 15 % for large companies;

21

| (d) | the maximum loan does not exceed the total annual wage bill of the beneficiary (including social charges as well as the cost of personnel working on the company site but formally in the payroll of subcontractors) for 2008. In the case of companies created on or after 1 January 2008, the maximum loan must not exceed the estimated annual wage bill for the first two years in operation; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the maximum loan does not exceed the total annual wage bill of the beneficiary (including social charges as well as the cost of personnel working on the company site but formally in the payroll of subcontractors) for 2008. In the case of companies created on or after 1 January 2008, the maximum loan must not exceed the estimated annual wage bill for the first two years in operation;

| (e) | guarantees are granted until 31 December 2010 at the latest; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

guarantees are granted until 31 December 2010 at the latest;

| (f) | the guarantee does not exceed 90 % of the loan for the duration of the loan; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

the guarantee does not exceed 90 % of the loan for the duration of the loan;

| (g) | the guarantee may relate to both investment and working capital loans; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

the guarantee may relate to both investment and working capital loans;

| (h) | the reduction of the guarantee premium is applied during a maximum period of 2 years following the granting of the guarantee. If the duration of the underlying loan exceeds 2 years, Member States may apply for an additional maximum period of 8 years the safe-harbour premiums set out in the Annex without reduction; |
| --- | --- |

(h)

the reduction of the guarantee premium is applied during a maximum period of 2 years following the granting of the guarantee. If the duration of the underlying loan exceeds 2 years, Member States may apply for an additional maximum period of 8 years the safe-harbour premiums set out in the Annex without reduction;

| (i) | the aid is granted to firms which were not in difficulty (22) on 1 July 2008; it may be granted to firms that were not in difficulty at that date but entered in difficulty thereafter as a result of the global financial and economic crisis. |
| --- | --- |

(i)

the aid is granted to firms which were not in difficulty (22) on 1 July 2008; it may be granted to firms that were not in difficulty at that date but entered in difficulty thereafter as a result of the global financial and economic crisis.

22

4.4.   Aid in the form of subsidised interest rate

Aid in the form of subsidised interest rate

4.4.1.   Existing framework

Existing framework

The Commission Communication on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (23) establishes a method for calculation of the reference rate, based on the one-year inter-bank offered rate (IBOR) increased by margins ranging from 60 to 1 000 base points, depending on the creditworthiness of the company and the level of collateral offered. The method for calculation of the reference and discount rates may be amended by the Commission, in order to reflect the prevailing market conditions. If Member States apply the calculation method of the reference and discount rates established in the Commission communication in force at the moment of the grant of the loan and comply with the conditions set out in that communication, the interest rate does, in principle, not contain State aid.

23

4.4.2.   New measure

New measure

Companies may have difficulties in finding finance in the current market circumstances. Therefore the Commission will accept that public or private loans are granted at an interest rate which is at least equal to the central bank overnight rate plus a premium equal to the difference between the average one year interbank rate and the average of the central bank overnight rate over the period from 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2008, plus the credit risk premium corresponding to the risk profile of the recipient, as stipulated by the Commission Communication on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates.

The aid element contained in the difference between this interest rate and the reference rate defined by the Commission Communication on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates will be considered, on a temporary basis, to be compatible with the Treaty on the basis of Article 87(3)(b), provided the following conditions are met:

| (a) | this method applies to all contracts concluded on 31 December 2010 at the latest; it may cover loans of any duration; the reduced interest rates may be applied for interest payments before 31 December 2012 (24); an interest rate at least equal to the rate defined in the reference and discount rate Communication must apply to loans after that date; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

this method applies to all contracts concluded on 31 December 2010 at the latest; it may cover loans of any duration; the reduced interest rates may be applied for interest payments before 31 December 2012 (24); an interest rate at least equal to the rate defined in the reference and discount rate Communication must apply to loans after that date;

24

| (b) | the aid is granted to firms which were not in difficulty on 1 July 2008 (25); it may be granted to firms that were not in difficulty at that date but entered in difficulty thereafter as a result of the global financial and economic crisis. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the aid is granted to firms which were not in difficulty on 1 July 2008 (25); it may be granted to firms that were not in difficulty at that date but entered in difficulty thereafter as a result of the global financial and economic crisis.

25

4.5.   Aid for the production of green products

Aid for the production of green products

4.5.1.   Existing framework

Existing framework

The Commission Communication on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (26) establishes a method for calculation of the reference rate, based on the one-year inter-bank offered rate (IBOR) increased by margins ranging from 60 to 1 000 base points, depending on the creditworthiness of the company and the level of collateral offered. The method for calculation of the reference and discount rates may be amended by the Commission in order to reflect the prevailing market conditions. If Member States apply the calculation method of the reference and discount rates established in the Commission communication in force at the moment of the grant of the loan and comply with the conditions set out in that communication, the interest rate does, in principle, not contain State aid.

26

4.5.2.   New measure

New measure

Because of the current financial crisis, companies are also finding it more difficult to gain access to finance for production of more environmentally friendly products. Aid in the form of guarantees may not be sufficient to finance costly projects aiming at increasing environmental protection by adapting earlier to future standards not yet in force or by going beyond such standards.

The Commission considers that environmental goals should remain a priority despite the financial crisis. Production of more environmentally friendly, including energy-efficient, products, is in the Community's interest and it is important that the financial crisis should not impede that objective.

Therefore, additional measures in the form of subsidised loans could encourage production of ‘green products’. However, subsidised loans may cause serious distortions of competition and should be strictly limited to specific situations and targeted investment.

The Commission considers that, for a limited period, Member States should be given the possibility of granting aid in the form of an interest-rate reduction.

On the basis of Article 87(3)(b) of the Treaty, the Commission will consider compatible with the common market any interest-rate subsidy for investment loans that meets all the following conditions:

| (a) | the aid relates to investment loans for financing projects consisting of production of new products which significantly improve environmental protection; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the aid relates to investment loans for financing projects consisting of production of new products which significantly improve environmental protection;

| (b) | the aid is necessary for launching a new project; in the case of existing projects, aid may be granted if it becomes necessary, due to the new economic situation, in order to pursue the project; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the aid is necessary for launching a new project; in the case of existing projects, aid may be granted if it becomes necessary, due to the new economic situation, in order to pursue the project;

| (c) | the aid is granted only for projects consisting of production of products involving early adaptation to or going beyond future Community product standards (27) which increase the level of environmental protection and are not yet in force; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the aid is granted only for projects consisting of production of products involving early adaptation to or going beyond future Community product standards (27) which increase the level of environmental protection and are not yet in force;

27

| (d) | for products involving early adaptation to or going beyond future Community environmental standards, the investment starts on 31 December 2010 at the latest with the objective of putting the product on the market at least two years before the standard enters into force; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

for products involving early adaptation to or going beyond future Community environmental standards, the investment starts on 31 December 2010 at the latest with the objective of putting the product on the market at least two years before the standard enters into force;

| (e) | loans may cover the costs of investment in tangible and intangible assets (28) with the exception of loans for investments which account for production capacities of more than 3 % on product markets (29) where the average annual growth rate, over the last five years before the start of the investment, of the apparent consumption on the EEA market, measured in value data, remained below the average annual growth rate of the European Economic Area's GDP over the same five year reference period; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

loans may cover the costs of investment in tangible and intangible assets (28) with the exception of loans for investments which account for production capacities of more than 3 % on product markets (29) where the average annual growth rate, over the last five years before the start of the investment, of the apparent consumption on the EEA market, measured in value data, remained below the average annual growth rate of the European Economic Area's GDP over the same five year reference period;

28

29

| (f) | the loans are granted on 31 December 2010 at the latest; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

the loans are granted on 31 December 2010 at the latest;

| (g) | for calculation of the aid, the starting point should be the individual rate of the beneficiary as calculated on the basis of the methodology contained in point 4.4.2 of this Communication. On the basis of that methodology, the company may benefit from an interest-rate reduction of:






  — | 25 % for large companies; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(g)

for calculation of the aid, the starting point should be the individual rate of the beneficiary as calculated on the basis of the methodology contained in point 4.4.2 of this Communication. On the basis of that methodology, the company may benefit from an interest-rate reduction of:

—

25 % for large companies;

| — | 50 % for SMEs; |
| --- | --- |

—

50 % for SMEs;

| (h) | the subsidised interest rate applies during a maximum period of 2 years following the granting of loan; |
| --- | --- |

(h)

the subsidised interest rate applies during a maximum period of 2 years following the granting of loan;

| (i) | the reduction in the interest rate may be applied to loans granted by the State or public finance institutions and to loans granted by private financial institutions. Non-discrimination between public and private entities should be ensured; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

the reduction in the interest rate may be applied to loans granted by the State or public finance institutions and to loans granted by private financial institutions. Non-discrimination between public and private entities should be ensured;

| (j) | the aid is granted to firms which were not in difficulty (30) on 1 July 2008; it may be granted to firms that were not in difficulty at that date but entered in difficulty thereafter as a result of the global financial and economic crisis; |
| --- | --- |

(j)

the aid is granted to firms which were not in difficulty (30) on 1 July 2008; it may be granted to firms that were not in difficulty at that date but entered in difficulty thereafter as a result of the global financial and economic crisis;

30

| (k) | Member States ensure that the aid is not directly or indirectly transferred to financial entities. |
| --- | --- |

(k)

Member States ensure that the aid is not directly or indirectly transferred to financial entities.

4.6.   Risk capital measures

Risk capital measures

4.6.1.   Existing framework

Existing framework

The Community guidelines on State aid to promote risk capital investments in small and medium-sized enterprises set out the conditions under which State aid supporting risk capital investment may be considered compatible with the common market in accordance with Article 87(3) of the Treaty.

Based on the experience gained from applying the guidelines on State aid to promote risk capital investments in small and medium-sized enterprises, the Commission considers that there is no general risk capital market failure in the Community. It does, however, accept that there are market gaps for some types of investment at certain stages of enterprises′ development which are the result of imperfect matching of supply of and demand for risk capital and can generally be described as an equity gap.

Point 4.3 of the guidelines states that for tranches of finance not exceeding EUR 1,5 million per target SME over each period of twelve months, under certain conditions market failure is presumed and does not need to be demonstrated by Member States.

Point 5.1(a) of the same guidelines states that ‘The Commission is aware of the constant fluctuation of the risk capital market and of the equity gap over time, as well as of the different degree by which enterprises are affected by the market failure depending on their size, on their stage of business development, and on their economic sector. Therefore, the Commission is prepared to consider declaring risk capital measures providing for investment tranches exceeding the threshold of EUR 1,5 million per enterprise per year compatible with the common market, provided the necessary evidence of the market failure is submitted’.

‘The Commission is aware of the constant fluctuation of the risk capital market and of the equity gap over time, as well as of the different degree by which enterprises are affected by the market failure depending on their size, on their stage of business development, and on their economic sector. Therefore, the Commission is prepared to consider declaring risk capital measures providing for investment tranches exceeding the threshold of EUR 1,5 million per enterprise per year compatible with the common market, provided the necessary evidence of the market failure is submitted’

4.6.2.   Temporary adaptation of the existing rules

Temporary adaptation of the existing rules

The turmoil on the financial market has had a negative effect on the risk capital market for early growth SMEs by tightening the availability of risk capital. Due to the currently greatly increased risk perception associated with risk capital linked with uncertainties resulting from possibly lower yield expectations, investors are currently tending to invest in safer assets the risks of which are easier to assess as compared to those associated with risk capital investments. Furthermore the illiquid nature of risk capital investments has proven to be a further disincentive for investors. There is evidence that the resulting restricted liquidity under current market circumstances has widened the equity gap for SMEs. It is therefore considered appropriate to temporarily raise the safe-harbour threshold for risk capital investments to meet the increased equity gap and to temporarily lower the percentage of minimum private investor participation to 30 % also in the case of measures targeting SMEs in non assisted areas.

Accordingly, on the basis of Article 87(3)(b) of the Treaty, certain limits set out in the Community guidelines on State aid to promote risk capital investments in small and medium-sized enterprises are temporarily adapted until 31 December 2010 as follows:

| (a) | for the purposes of point 4.3.1:, the maximum permitted tranches of finance are increased to EUR 2,5 million, from EUR 1,5 million per target SME over each period of twelve months; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

for the purposes of point 4.3.1:, the maximum permitted tranches of finance are increased to EUR 2,5 million, from EUR 1,5 million per target SME over each period of twelve months;

| (b) | for the purposes of point 4.3.4, the minimum amount of funding to be provided by private investors is 30 % both in and outside assisted areas; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

for the purposes of point 4.3.4, the minimum amount of funding to be provided by private investors is 30 % both in and outside assisted areas;

| (c) | other conditions laid down in the guidelines remain applicable; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

other conditions laid down in the guidelines remain applicable;

| (d) | this temporary adaptation of the guidelines does not apply to risk capital measures covered by the GBER. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

this temporary adaptation of the guidelines does not apply to risk capital measures covered by the GBER.

| (e) | Member States may adapt approved schemes to reflect the temporary adaptation of the guidelines. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

Member States may adapt approved schemes to reflect the temporary adaptation of the guidelines.

4.7.   Cumulation

Cumulation

The aid ceilings fixed under this Communication will be applied regardless of whether the support for the aided project is financed entirely from State resources or partly financed by the Community.

The temporary aid measures foreseen by this Communication may not be cumulated with aid falling within the scope of the de minimis Regulation for the same eligible costs. If the undertaking has already received de minimis aid prior to the entry into force of this temporary framework the sum of the aid received under the measures covered by point 4.2 of this Communication and the de minimis aid received must not exceed EUR 500 000 between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2010. The amount of de minimis aid received from 1 January 2008 must be deducted from the amount of compatible aid granted for the same purpose under points 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 or 4.6.

de minimis

de minimis

de minimis

de minimis

The temporary aid measures may be cumulated with other compatible aid or with other forms of Community financing provided that the maximum aid intensities indicated in the relevant guidelines or block exemptions Regulations are respected.

5.   SIMPLIFICATION MEASURES

SIMPLIFICATION MEASURES

5.1.   Short-term export credit insurance

Short-term export credit insurance

The Communication from the Commission to Member States pursuant to Article 93(1) of the EC Treaty applying Articles 92 and 93 of the Treaty to short-term export-credit insurance (31) stipulates that marketable risks cannot be covered by export-credit insurance with the support of Member States. Marketable risks are commercial and political risks on public and non-public debtors established in countries listed in the Annex to that Communication, with a maximum risk period of less than two years. Risks concerning debtors established in the Member States and eight further members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development are considered marketable.

31

The Commission considers that, as a consequence of the current financial crisis, a lack of insurance or reinsurance capacity does not exist in every Member State, but it cannot be excluded that, in certain countries cover for marketable risks could be temporarily unavailable.

Point 4.4 of the Communication states that: ‘In such circumstances, those temporarily non-marketable risks may be taken on to the account of a public or publicly supported export-credit insurer for non-marketable risks insured for the account of or with the guarantee of the State. The insurer should, as far as possible, align its premium rates for such risks with the rates charged elsewhere by private export-credit insurers for the type of risk in question.

‘In such circumstances, those temporarily non-marketable risks may be taken on to the account of a public or publicly supported export-credit insurer for non-marketable risks insured for the account of or with the guarantee of the State. The insurer should, as far as possible, align its premium rates for such risks with the rates charged elsewhere by private export-credit insurers for the type of risk in question.

Any Member State intending to use that escape clause should immediately notify the Commission of its draft decision. That notification should contain a market report demonstrating the unavailability of cover for the risks in the private insurance market by producing evidence thereof from two large, well-known international private export-credit insurers as well as a national credit insurer, thus justifying the use of the escape clause. It should, moreover, contain a description of the conditions which the public or publicly supported export-credit insurer intends to apply in respect of such risks.

Any Member State intending to use that escape clause should immediately notify the Commission of its draft decision. That notification should contain a market report demonstrating the unavailability of cover for the risks in the private insurance market by producing evidence thereof from two large, well-known international private export-credit insurers as well as a national credit insurer, thus justifying the use of the escape clause. It should, moreover, contain a description of the conditions which the public or publicly supported export-credit insurer intends to apply in respect of such risks.

Within two months of the receipt of such notification, the Commission will examine whether the use of the escape clause is in conformity with the above conditions and compatible with the Treaty.

Within two months of the receipt of such notification, the Commission will examine whether the use of the escape clause is in conformity with the above conditions and compatible with the Treaty.

If the Commission finds that the conditions for the use of the escape clause are fulfilled, its decision on compatibility is limited to two years from the date of the decision, provided that the market conditions justifying the use of the escape clause do not change during that period.

If the Commission finds that the conditions for the use of the escape clause are fulfilled, its decision on compatibility is limited to two years from the date of the decision, provided that the market conditions justifying the use of the escape clause do not change during that period.

Furthermore, the Commission may, in consultation with the other Member States, revise the conditions for the use of the escape clause; it may also decide to discontinue it or replace it with another appropriate system.’

Furthermore, the Commission may, in consultation with the other Member States, revise the conditions for the use of the escape clause; it may also decide to discontinue it or replace it with another appropriate system.’

Those provisions, applicable to large companies and SMEs, are an appropriate instrument in the current economic situation if Member States consider that cover is unavailable on the private insurance market for certain marketable credit risks and/or for certain buyers of risk protection.

In this context, in order to speed up the procedure for Member States, the Commission considers that, until 31 December 2010, Member States may demonstrate the lack of market by providing sufficient evidence of the unavailability of cover for the risk in the private insurance market. Use of the escape clause will in any case be considered justified if:

| — | a large well-known international private export credits insurer and a national credit insurer produce evidence of the unavailability of such cover or |
| --- | --- |

—

a large well-known international private export credits insurer and a national credit insurer produce evidence of the unavailability of such cover or

| — | at least four well-established exporters in the Member State produce evidence of refusal of cover from insurers for specific operations. |
| --- | --- |

—

at least four well-established exporters in the Member State produce evidence of refusal of cover from insurers for specific operations.

The Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States concerned, will ensure swift adoption of decisions concerning the application of the escape clause.

5.2.   Simplification of procedures

Simplification of procedures

State aid measures referred to in this Communication must be notified to the Commission. Beyond the substantive measures set out in this Communication, the Commission is committed to ensuring the swift authorisation of aid measures that address the current crisis in accordance with this Communication provided close cooperation and full information is provided by the Member States concerned.

This commitment will complement the on-going process, whereby the Commission is currently drafting a number of improvements to its general State aid procedures, particularly to allow quicker and more effective decision-making in close cooperation with Member States. This general simplification package should, in particular, enshrine joint commitments by the Commission and Member States to more streamlined and predictable procedures at each step of a State aid investigation and allow faster approval of straightforward cases.

6.   MONITORING AND REPORTING

MONITORING AND REPORTING

Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (32) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (33) require Member States to submit annual reports to the Commission.

32

33

By 31 July 2009, Member States must provide the Commission with a list of schemes put in place on the basis of this Communication.

Member States must ensure that detailed records regarding the granting of aid provided for by this Communication are maintained. Such records, which must contain all information necessary to establish that the necessary conditions have been observed, must be maintained for 10 years and be provided to the Commission upon request. In particular, Member States must have obtained information demonstrating that the aid beneficiaries under the measures provided for in points 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 were not companies in difficulty on 1 July 2008.

In addition, a report on the measures put in place on the basis of this Communication should be provided to the Commission by Member States by 31 October 2009. In particular, the report should provide elements indicating the need for the Commission to maintain the measures provided for by this Communication after 31 December 2009, as well as detailed information on the environmental benefits of the subsidised loans. Member States must provide this information for any subsequent year during which this Communication is applied, before 31 October of each year.

The Commission may request additional information regarding the aid granted, to check whether the conditions laid down in the Commission decision approving the aid measure have been met.

7.   FINAL PROVISIONS

FINAL PROVISIONS

The Commission applies this Communication from 17 December 2008, the date on which it agreed in principle its content, having regard to the financial and economic context which required immediate action. This Communication is justified by the current exceptional and transitory financing problems related to the banking crisis and will not be applied after 31 December 2010. After consulting Member States, the Commission may review it before that date on the basis of important competition policy or economic considerations. Where this would be helpful, the Commission may also provide further clarifications of its approach to particular issues.

The Commission applies the provisions of this Communication to all notified risk capital measures on which it must take a decision after 17 December 2008, even if the measures were notified prior to that date.

In accordance with the Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid (34), the Commission applies the following in respect of non-notified aid:

34

| (a) | this Communication, if the aid was granted after 17 December 2008; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

this Communication, if the aid was granted after 17 December 2008;

| (b) | the guidelines applicable when the aid was granted in all other cases. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the guidelines applicable when the aid was granted in all other cases.

The Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States concerned, ensures swift adoption of decisions upon complete notification of measures covered by this Communication. Member States should inform the Commission of their intentions and notify plans to introduce such measures as early and comprehensively as possible.

The Commission wishes to recall that any procedural improvement depends entirely on submission of clear and complete notifications.

---

(1)  Communication from the Commission to the European Council, COM(2008) 800.

1

(2)  Conclusions of the ECOFIN Council of 7 October 2008.

2

(3)  OJ C 270, 25.10.2008, p. 8.

3

(4)  COM(2008) 394 final.

4

(5)  OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 15.

5

(6)  OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

6

(7)  OJ L 214, 9.8.2008, p. 3.

7

(8)  OJ L 379, 28.12.2006, p. 5.

8

(9)  OJ C 82, 1.4.2008, p. 1.

9

(10)  OJ C 323, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

10

(11)  OJ C 155, 20.6.2008, p. 10.

11

(12)  OJ C 194, 18.8.2006, p. 2.

12

(13)  OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13.

13

(14)  OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2.

14

(15)  Joined Cases T-132/96 and T-143/96 Freistaat Sachsen and Volkswagen AG v Commission [1999] ECR II-3663, paragraph 167.

15

Freistaat Sachsen and Volkswagen AG v Commission

(16)  Commission Decision 98/490/EC in Case C 47/96 Crédit Lyonnais (OJ L 221, 8.8.1998, p. 28), point 10.1; Commission Decision 2005/345/EC in Case C 28/02 Bankgesellschaft Berlin (OJ L 116, 4.5.2005, p. 1), points 153 et seq.; and Commission Decision 2008/263/EC in Case C 50/06 BAWAG (OJ L 83, 26.3.2008, p. 7), point 166. See Commission Decision in Case NN 70/07 Northern Rock (OJ C 43, 16.2.2008, p. 1), Commission Decision in Case NN 25/08 Rescue aid to WestLB (OJ C 189, 26.7.2008, p. 3) and Commission Decision of 4 June 2008 in Case C 9/08 SachsenLB, not yet published.

16

Crédit Lyonnais

Bankgesellschaft Berlin

et seq

BAWAG

Northern Rock

Rescue aid to WestLB

SachsenLB

(17)  For the purposes of this Communication ‘firm in difficulty’ means:

17

| — | for large companies, a firm in difficulty as defined in point 2.1 of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty |
| --- | --- |

—

for large companies, a firm in difficulty as defined in point 2.1 of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty

| — | for SMEs, a firm in difficulty as defined in Article 1(7) of the GBER. |
| --- | --- |

—

for SMEs, a firm in difficulty as defined in Article 1(7) of the GBER.

(18)  As defined in Article 2(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 (OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p. 3).

18

(19)  As defined in Article 2(3) and 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006.

19

(20)  The premiums in the Annex refines the safe-harbour provisions of the Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 155, 20.6.2008) by taking account of different levels of collateralisation. They may also be used as benchmark to calculate the compatible aid element for guarantee measures falling under point 4.2 of this framework.

20

The calculation of the safe-harbour premiums is based on the margins provided by the Commission Communication on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6), taking account of an additional reduction of 20 basis points (see footnote 11 of the Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees ). For each rating category, however, the safe-harbour premium as set out in the Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 155, 20.6.2008) remained the upper premium limit for each rating category. As to the definition of the different levels of collateralisation see footnote 2, page 3 of the Commission Communication on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6).

(21)  Such as the GBER or Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 or Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006, provided that the approved methodology explicitly addresses the type of guarantees and the type of underlying transactions at stake.

21

(22)  See footnote 17.

22

(23)  OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.

23

(24)  Member States who want to use this facility have to publish the daily overnight rates online and have to make them available to the Commission.

24

(25)  See footnote 17.

25

(26)  OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.

26

(27)  Future Community product standard means a mandatory Community standard setting environmental levels to be attained for products sold in the Community which has been adopted but is not yet in force.

27

(28)  As defined in point 70 of the Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection.

28

(29)  As defined in point 69 of the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013.

29

(30)  See footnote 17.

30

(31)  OJ C 281, 17.9.1997, p. 4.

31

(32)  OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1.

32

(33)  OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

33

(34)  OJ C 119, 22.5.2002, p. 22.

34

---

ANNEX

| Safe-harbours Temporary Framework in basis points (1) |
| --- |
| Rating category (Standard & Poor′s) | Collateralisation |
| High | Normal | Low |
| AAA | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| AA+
  AA
  AA- | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| A+
  A
  A- | 40 | 55 | 55 |
| BBB+
  BBB
  BBB- | 55 | 80 | 80 |
| BB+
  BB | 80 | 200 | 200 |
| BB-
  B+ | 200 | 380 | 380 |
| B
  B- | 200 | 380 | 630 |
| CCC and below | 380 | 630 | 980 |

Safe-harbours Temporary Framework in basis points (1)

Rating category (Standard & Poor′s)

Collateralisation

High

Normal

Low

AAA

40

40

40

AA+

AA

AA-

40

40

40

A+

A

A-

40

55

55

BBB+

BBB

BBB-

55

80

80

BB+

BB

80

200

200

BB-

B+

200

380

380

B

B-

200

380

630

CCC and below

380

630

980

---

(1)  For companies which do not have a credit history or a rating based on a balance sheet approach (such as certain special purpose companies or start-up companies), Member States may grant a reduction up to 15 % (25 % for SMEs) on the specific safe-harbour premium set at 3,8 % in the Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 155, 20.6.2008). However, the premium can never be lower than the premium which would be applicable to the parent company or companies.

---

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/16

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28.1.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid No | E 4/07 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Différenciation des «redevances par passager» sur certains aéroports français |
| Legal basis | — |
| Type of measure | Acceptance of appropriate measures — abolition of an existing aid scheme |
| Objective | — |
| Form of aid | Differentiation of airport charges |
| Budget | — |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration | — |
| Economic sectors | Civil aviation |
| Name and address of the granting authority | — |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

28.1.2009

Aid No

E 4/07

Member State

France

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Différenciation des «redevances par passager» sur certains aéroports français

Legal basis

—

Type of measure

Acceptance of appropriate measures — abolition of an existing aid scheme

Objective

—

Form of aid

Differentiation of airport charges

Budget

—

Intensity

—

Duration

—

Economic sectors

Civil aviation

Name and address of the granting authority

—

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/State_aids/index.htm

---

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5289 — Agusta/CAE/Rotorsim)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/03

On 27 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5289. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5289. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4993 — EDF/EnBW/Kogeneracja)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/04

On 11 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M4993. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M4993. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4998 — EDF/EnBW/ERSA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/05

On 11 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M4998. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M4998. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5232 — WPP/TNS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/06

On 23 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5232. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5232. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Council

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/19

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 March 2009

appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers

2009/C 83/07

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (1) , and in particular Article 82 thereof,

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 22 March 2007 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers for the period 22 March 2007 to 21 March 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 22 March 2007 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers for the period 22 March 2007 to 21 March 2009.

| (2) | Members and alternate members of that Committee should be appointed for two years, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Members and alternate members of that Committee should be appointed for two years,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers for the period 30 March 2009 to 29 March 2011:

I.   GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

| Country | Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Belgium | Mr Keyina MPEYE
  Ms Alix GEYSELS | Ms Herlinde VANHOOYDONCK |
| Bulgaria | Ms Dobrinka BONEVA
  Ms Eva TOSHEVA | Ms Petya MALAKOVA |
| Czech Republic | Ms Gabriela PIKOROVA
  Mr Jiri BAUER | |
| Denmark | Ms Karin MØHL LARSEN
  Ms Vibeke DALBRO | Mr Uffe B. RASMUSSEN |
| Germany | Mr Helmut WEBER
  Mr Rainer ALBERS | Mr Bruno BARTH |
| Estonia | Ms Evelyn HALLIKA
  Ms Agne NETTAN | Ms Leili ZAGLMAYER |
| Ireland | Ms Anne McMANUS
  Mr Paul CUNNINGHAM | Mr Dermot MAGAN |
| Greece | Ms Anna RIZOU
  Ms Ioanna BOUZALAKOU | Ms Theodora KARACHRISTOU |
| Spain | Ms Marta VIVES CABALLERO
  Ms Ainhoa LÓPEZ DE GOICOECHEA URBAINQUI | Ms Concepción HERRERA FERNÁNDEZ |
| France | Ms Katia JULIENNE
  Mr Louis RANVIER | Mr Jean-Claude FILLON |
| Italy | | |
| Cyprus | Ms Dora PETSA
  Mr Andreas KYRIAKIDES | Ms Chryso ORPHANOU |
| Latvia | Ms Dace ZABIŅAKO
  Ms Jana MUIŽNIECE | Ms Ilze ŠĶIŅĶE |
| Lithuania | Ms Mariana ŽIUKIENĖ
  Ms Janina ANDRIUŠKEVIČIŪTĖ | Ms Irena MARTINKUTĖ |
| Luxembourg | | |
| Hungary | Ms Réka KOVÁCS
  Ms Vera ÁCS | Ms Judit RÉZMŰVES |
| Malta | | |
| Netherlands | Ms A.A.J. VRIJ
  Mr A.G. BLOEMHEUVEL | Mr J.A.M.M. PIJNENBURG |
| Austria | Mr Bernhard SPIEGEL
  Mr Heinz WITTMANN | Mr Manfred PÖLTL |
| Poland | Ms Elżbieta ROŻEK
  Ms Elżbieta TOMASZEWSKA | Ms Grażyna SYPNIEWSKA |
| Portugal | Mr Manuel I. ANTUNES PINTO
  Ms Elizabete SOUSA SILVEIRA | Mr Eurico Manuel CURATES RODRIGUES |
| Romania | Ms Magda FILIP
  Ms Raluca LUCHIAN | Ms Maria Luiza SOCOL-FLORESCU |
| Slovenia | | |
| Slovakia | Mr Jaroslav KOVÁČ
  Ms Lucia PODHRADSKÁ | Ms Xénia MALÁ |
| Finland | Ms Carin LINDQVIST-VIRTANEN
  Ms Mervi KATTELUS | Ms Marja-Terttu MÄKIRANTA |
| Sweden | Ms Lena MALMBERG
  Ms Johanna DUNÉR | Ms Kerstin JACOBSSON |
| United Kingdom | Mr Peter BODE
  Ms Ute CHATTERJEE | Ms Marion REES |

Country

Members

Alternates

Belgium

Mr Keyina MPEYE

Ms Alix GEYSELS

Ms Herlinde VANHOOYDONCK

Bulgaria

Ms Dobrinka BONEVA

Ms Eva TOSHEVA

Ms Petya MALAKOVA

Czech Republic

Ms Gabriela PIKOROVA

Mr Jiri BAUER

Denmark

Ms Karin MØHL LARSEN

Ms Vibeke DALBRO

Mr Uffe B. RASMUSSEN

Germany

Mr Helmut WEBER

Mr Rainer ALBERS

Mr Bruno BARTH

Estonia

Ms Evelyn HALLIKA

Ms Agne NETTAN

Ms Leili ZAGLMAYER

Ireland

Ms Anne McMANUS

Mr Paul CUNNINGHAM

Mr Dermot MAGAN

Greece

Ms Anna RIZOU

Ms Ioanna BOUZALAKOU

Ms Theodora KARACHRISTOU

Spain

Ms Marta VIVES CABALLERO

Ms Ainhoa LÓPEZ DE GOICOECHEA URBAINQUI

Ms Concepción HERRERA FERNÁNDEZ

France

Ms Katia JULIENNE

Mr Louis RANVIER

Mr Jean-Claude FILLON

Italy

Cyprus

Ms Dora PETSA

Mr Andreas KYRIAKIDES

Ms Chryso ORPHANOU

Latvia

Ms Dace ZABIŅAKO

Ms Jana MUIŽNIECE

Ms Ilze ŠĶIŅĶE

Lithuania

Ms Mariana ŽIUKIENĖ

Ms Janina ANDRIUŠKEVIČIŪTĖ

Ms Irena MARTINKUTĖ

Luxembourg

Hungary

Ms Réka KOVÁCS

Ms Vera ÁCS

Ms Judit RÉZMŰVES

Malta

Netherlands

Ms A.A.J. VRIJ

Mr A.G. BLOEMHEUVEL

Mr J.A.M.M. PIJNENBURG

Austria

Mr Bernhard SPIEGEL

Mr Heinz WITTMANN

Mr Manfred PÖLTL

Poland

Ms Elżbieta ROŻEK

Ms Elżbieta TOMASZEWSKA

Ms Grażyna SYPNIEWSKA

Portugal

Mr Manuel I. ANTUNES PINTO

Ms Elizabete SOUSA SILVEIRA

Mr Eurico Manuel CURATES RODRIGUES

Romania

Ms Magda FILIP

Ms Raluca LUCHIAN

Ms Maria Luiza SOCOL-FLORESCU

Slovenia

Slovakia

Mr Jaroslav KOVÁČ

Ms Lucia PODHRADSKÁ

Ms Xénia MALÁ

Finland

Ms Carin LINDQVIST-VIRTANEN

Ms Mervi KATTELUS

Ms Marja-Terttu MÄKIRANTA

Sweden

Ms Lena MALMBERG

Ms Johanna DUNÉR

Ms Kerstin JACOBSSON

United Kingdom

Mr Peter BODE

Ms Ute CHATTERJEE

Ms Marion REES

II.   TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

| Country | Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Belgium | Ms Estelle CEULEMANS
  Mr Koen MEESTERS | Ms Sylvia LOGIST |
| Bulgaria | Ms Assia GONEVA
  Ms Diana ANGELOVA | Ms Velichka MIKOVA |
| Czech Republic | Ms Helena ČORNEJOVÁ
  Ms Jaroslava BAUEROVÁ | |
| Denmark | Mr Michael JACOBSEN
  Ms Jette HØY | Mr Jens MØLBACH |
| Germany | Ms Renate GABKE
  Mr Max EPPELEIN | Mr Gert SILLER |
| Estonia | Ms Liina CARR
  Mr Margo KIKAS | Ms Kaia VASK |
| Ireland | Ms Anne SPEED
  Mr Stellan HARMANSSON | Mr Eamonn DEVOY |
| Greece | Mr Labros PAPAIOANNOU
  Mr Petros GIANNOULOPOULOS | Mr Ioannis PAPAGEORGIOU |
| Spain | Mr Carlos BRAVO FERNÁNDEZ
  Ms Ana Maria CORRAL JUAN | Mr José Antonio MORENO DÍAZ |
| France | Mr Jacques MOREAU
  Mr Ommar BENFAÏD | Mr David RIBOH |
| Italy | | |
| Cyprus | Mr Nicos EPISTITHIOU
  Mr Nicos GREGORIOU | Ms Anna PILAVAKI |
| Latvia | Mr Kaspars RĀCENĀJS
  Ms Zanda GRUNDBERGA | Ms Irina HOMKO |
| Lithuania | Mr Vydas PUSKEPALIS
  Mr Arùnas Albinas VISOCKAS | Ms Janina MATUIZIENĖ |
| Luxembourg | | |
| Hungary | Ms Emese MOLNÁR
  Mr Zoltán PAPP | Mr Péter SZABÓ |
| Malta | | |
| Netherlands | Ms K.M. SENGERS
  Mr P.F. VAN KRUINING | Ms D. VAARTJES-VAN SUIJDAM |
| Austria | Mr Werner PLETZENAUER
  Ms Dinah DJALINOUS-GLATZ | Ms Monika WEIßENSTEINER |
| Poland | Mr Adam ROGALEWSKI
  Ms Katarzyna SOSNOWSKA | Ms Zuzanna MUSKAT-GÓRSKA |
| Portugal | Mr Carlos Manuel ALVES TRINDADE
  Ms Ana Paula BERNARDO | Ms Wanda Olavo CORREA GUIMARAES |
| Romania | Ms Carmen IONESCU
  Mr Radmilo FELIX | Ms Mariana KNICSNER |
| Slovenia | | |
| Slovakia | Ms Mária SVOREŇOVÁ
  Ms Zdena DVORANOVÁ | Ms Gabriela KRCHŇÁKOVÁ |
| Finland | Ms Katja VEIRTO
  Mr Jarmo PÄTÄRI | Ms Heli PUURA |
| Sweden | Ms Ellen NYGREN
  Mr Kjell RAUTIO | Ms Marie-Louise STRÖMGREN |
| United Kingdom | Mr Richard EXELL
  Mr Sean BAMFORD | Ms Elena CRASTA |

Country

Members

Alternates

Belgium

Ms Estelle CEULEMANS

Mr Koen MEESTERS

Ms Sylvia LOGIST

Bulgaria

Ms Assia GONEVA

Ms Diana ANGELOVA

Ms Velichka MIKOVA

Czech Republic

Ms Helena ČORNEJOVÁ

Ms Jaroslava BAUEROVÁ

Denmark

Mr Michael JACOBSEN

Ms Jette HØY

Mr Jens MØLBACH

Germany

Ms Renate GABKE

Mr Max EPPELEIN

Mr Gert SILLER

Estonia

Ms Liina CARR

Mr Margo KIKAS

Ms Kaia VASK

Ireland

Ms Anne SPEED

Mr Stellan HARMANSSON

Mr Eamonn DEVOY

Greece

Mr Labros PAPAIOANNOU

Mr Petros GIANNOULOPOULOS

Mr Ioannis PAPAGEORGIOU

Spain

Mr Carlos BRAVO FERNÁNDEZ

Ms Ana Maria CORRAL JUAN

Mr José Antonio MORENO DÍAZ

France

Mr Jacques MOREAU

Mr Ommar BENFAÏD

Mr David RIBOH

Italy

Cyprus

Mr Nicos EPISTITHIOU

Mr Nicos GREGORIOU

Ms Anna PILAVAKI

Latvia

Mr Kaspars RĀCENĀJS

Ms Zanda GRUNDBERGA

Ms Irina HOMKO

Lithuania

Mr Vydas PUSKEPALIS

Mr Arùnas Albinas VISOCKAS

Ms Janina MATUIZIENĖ

Luxembourg

Hungary

Ms Emese MOLNÁR

Mr Zoltán PAPP

Mr Péter SZABÓ

Malta

Netherlands

Ms K.M. SENGERS

Mr P.F. VAN KRUINING

Ms D. VAARTJES-VAN SUIJDAM

Austria

Mr Werner PLETZENAUER

Ms Dinah DJALINOUS-GLATZ

Ms Monika WEIßENSTEINER

Poland

Mr Adam ROGALEWSKI

Ms Katarzyna SOSNOWSKA

Ms Zuzanna MUSKAT-GÓRSKA

Portugal

Mr Carlos Manuel ALVES TRINDADE

Ms Ana Paula BERNARDO

Ms Wanda Olavo CORREA GUIMARAES

Romania

Ms Carmen IONESCU

Mr Radmilo FELIX

Ms Mariana KNICSNER

Slovenia

Slovakia

Ms Mária SVOREŇOVÁ

Ms Zdena DVORANOVÁ

Ms Gabriela KRCHŇÁKOVÁ

Finland

Ms Katja VEIRTO

Mr Jarmo PÄTÄRI

Ms Heli PUURA

Sweden

Ms Ellen NYGREN

Mr Kjell RAUTIO

Ms Marie-Louise STRÖMGREN

United Kingdom

Mr Richard EXELL

Mr Sean BAMFORD

Ms Elena CRASTA

III.   REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS′ ORGANISATIONS

| Country | Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Belgium | Mr Ivo VAN DAMME
  Ms Hilde THYS | Ms Monica DE JONGHE |
| Bulgaria | Mr Rumen RADEV
  Mr Teodor DECHEV | Mr Ivan ZAHARIEV |
| Czech Republic | Mr Jiří SVOBODA
  Ms Irena DOKTOROVÁ | Mr Luděk MAZUCH |
| Denmark | Mr Flemming DRESEN
  Mr Henning GADE | Ms Dorthe ANDERSEN |
| Germany | Ms Susanne LEXA
  Ms Angela SCHNEIDER-BODIEN | Mr Volker HANSEN |
| Estonia | Mr Heinart PUHKIM
  Ms Victoria METS | Mr Jaanus REBANE |
| Ireland | Ms Jean WINTERS
  Ms Claire JONES | Ms Heidi LOUGHEED |
| Greece | Mr Fotis KOLEVENTIS
  Mr Apostolos KOKKINOS | Mr Sotirios TSONIS |
| Spain | Ms Pilar IGLESIAS VALCARCE
  Mr Roberto SUÁREZ SANTOS | Mr Pablo GÓMEZ ALBO |
| France | Ms Emilie MARTINEZ
  Ms Marie-Christine FAUCHOIS | Ms Natacha MARQUET |
| Italy | | |
| Cyprus | Ms Lena PANAYIOTOU
  Mr Emilios MICHAEL | Mr Lefteris KARYDIS |
| Latvia | Ms Ilona KIUKUCĀNE
  Ms Inese STEPIŅA | Ms Dace ŠAITERE |
| Lithuania | Mr Aidas VAIČIULIS
  Mr Edmundas JANKEVIČIUS | Mr Vaidotas LEVICKIS |
| Luxembourg | | |
| Hungary | Ms Terézia BOROSNÉ BARTHA
  Ms Eszter ALMÁSSY | Mr István KOMORÓCZKI |
| Malta | | |
| Netherlands | Ms L.M. VAN EMBDEN ANDRES
  Mr K.B. VAN POPTA | Mr R. BLAAKMAN |
| Austria | Mr Martin GLEITSMANN
  Mr Heinrich BRAUNER | Ms Ruth SCHINDLER |
| Poland | Mr Michał MAKSYMIUK
  Mr Jacek MĘCINA | Mr Zbigniew ŻUREK |
| Portugal | Ms Cristina NAGY MORAIS
  Mr Marcelino PENA COSTA | Ms Adília LISBOA |
| Romania | Ms Roxana PRODAN
  Ms Dorin CHIRILĂ | Mr Catargiu IRIMIE |
| Slovenia | | |
| Slovakia | Mr Vladimír KALINA
  Ms Zuzana ŠPALDONOVÁ | Mr Jozef ORGONÁŠ |
| Finland | Mr Markus ÄIMÄLÄ
  Mr Mikko RÄSÄNEN | Mr Johan ÅSTRÖM |
| Sweden | Ms Sofia BERGSTRÖM
  Ms Agneta ÅHLIN | Mr Hans GIDHAGEN |
| United Kingdom | Mr Jim BLIGH
  Mr Rob CUMMINGS | Mr Neil CARBERRY |

Country

Members

Alternates

Belgium

Mr Ivo VAN DAMME

Ms Hilde THYS

Ms Monica DE JONGHE

Bulgaria

Mr Rumen RADEV

Mr Teodor DECHEV

Mr Ivan ZAHARIEV

Czech Republic

Mr Jiří SVOBODA

Ms Irena DOKTOROVÁ

Mr Luděk MAZUCH

Denmark

Mr Flemming DRESEN

Mr Henning GADE

Ms Dorthe ANDERSEN

Germany

Ms Susanne LEXA

Ms Angela SCHNEIDER-BODIEN

Mr Volker HANSEN

Estonia

Mr Heinart PUHKIM

Ms Victoria METS

Mr Jaanus REBANE

Ireland

Ms Jean WINTERS

Ms Claire JONES

Ms Heidi LOUGHEED

Greece

Mr Fotis KOLEVENTIS

Mr Apostolos KOKKINOS

Mr Sotirios TSONIS

Spain

Ms Pilar IGLESIAS VALCARCE

Mr Roberto SUÁREZ SANTOS

Mr Pablo GÓMEZ ALBO

France

Ms Emilie MARTINEZ

Ms Marie-Christine FAUCHOIS

Ms Natacha MARQUET

Italy

Cyprus

Ms Lena PANAYIOTOU

Mr Emilios MICHAEL

Mr Lefteris KARYDIS

Latvia

Ms Ilona KIUKUCĀNE

Ms Inese STEPIŅA

Ms Dace ŠAITERE

Lithuania

Mr Aidas VAIČIULIS

Mr Edmundas JANKEVIČIUS

Mr Vaidotas LEVICKIS

Luxembourg

Hungary

Ms Terézia BOROSNÉ BARTHA

Ms Eszter ALMÁSSY

Mr István KOMORÓCZKI

Malta

Netherlands

Ms L.M. VAN EMBDEN ANDRES

Mr K.B. VAN POPTA

Mr R. BLAAKMAN

Austria

Mr Martin GLEITSMANN

Mr Heinrich BRAUNER

Ms Ruth SCHINDLER

Poland

Mr Michał MAKSYMIUK

Mr Jacek MĘCINA

Mr Zbigniew ŻUREK

Portugal

Ms Cristina NAGY MORAIS

Mr Marcelino PENA COSTA

Ms Adília LISBOA

Romania

Ms Roxana PRODAN

Ms Dorin CHIRILĂ

Mr Catargiu IRIMIE

Slovenia

Slovakia

Mr Vladimír KALINA

Ms Zuzana ŠPALDONOVÁ

Mr Jozef ORGONÁŠ

Finland

Mr Markus ÄIMÄLÄ

Mr Mikko RÄSÄNEN

Mr Johan ÅSTRÖM

Sweden

Ms Sofia BERGSTRÖM

Ms Agneta ÅHLIN

Mr Hans GIDHAGEN

United Kingdom

Mr Jim BLIGH

Mr Rob CUMMINGS

Mr Neil CARBERRY

Article 2

The Council will appoint the members not yet nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published for information in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2009.

For the Council

The President

P. BENDL

---

(1)  OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ C 92, 27.4.2007, p. 7.

2

---

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/24

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 March 2009

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

2009/C 83/08

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

Having regard to the nominations submitted by the ITALIAN Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 18 September 2006 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2006 to 17 September 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 18 September 2006 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2006 to 17 September 2009.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Ing. Enrico Eugenio CECCOTTI. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Ing. Enrico Eugenio CECCOTTI.

| (3) | The Italian member of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2009, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Italian member of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2009,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2009:

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

ITALY: Dott. Filippo MAZZOTTI

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2009.

For the Council

The President

P. BENDL

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 240, 5.10.2006, p. 1.

2

---

Commission

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/25

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

6 April 2009

2009/C 83/09

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3496 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4485 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90520 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7400 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5247 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7850 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,558 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 294,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4373 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1538 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1230 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8954 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6656 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4611 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2923 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0316 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 767,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1319 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2242 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4364 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 284,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7999 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,460 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,7815 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,607 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9853 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2000 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,4800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3496

JPY

Japanese yen

136,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,4485

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90520

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7400

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5247

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7850

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,558

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

294,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4373

RON

Romanian leu

4,1538

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1230

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8954

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6656

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4611

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2923

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0316

KRW

South Korean won

1 767,00

ZAR

South African rand

12,1319

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2242

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4364

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 284,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7999

PHP

Philippine peso

64,460

RUB

Russian rouble

44,7815

THB

Thai baht

47,607

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9853

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2000

INR

Indian rupee

67,4800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/26

---

Call for proposals — DG ENTR No ENT/ERA/09/311

Erasmus for young entrepreneurs

2009/C 83/10

1.   Objectives and description

This call for proposals aims to help new EU entrepreneurs enrich their experiences, learning and networking by spending periods in enterprises run by experienced entrepreneurs in other EU Member States. The overall objective of the preparatory action is to enhance the entrepreneurship, internationalisation and competitiveness of potential start-up entrepreneurs and newly established micro and small enterprises in the EU. The activity targets people intending to set up a business and recently established entrepreneurs.

The call comprises two lots with two types of activity:

Lot 1: European partnerships and national and regional public authorities enhancing and facilitating the mobility of nascent entrepreneurs.

Lot 2: Support, coordination and networking linked to the activities mentioned in Lot 1.

2.   Eligible applicants

Any public entity or private entity active in the field of business support can participate in this call for proposals. This may include in particular:

| — | national or regional public authorities exercising State authority, i.e. government, ministry, administration or agency, or another public authority operating at national or regional level that is directly subordinated to a national or regional government, ministry or administration and exercises public functions under delegation of power given by this national or regional government, ministry or administration; they must have statutory responsibility in the field of fostering, promoting and/or supporting entrepreneurship, |
| --- | --- |

—

national or regional public authorities exercising State authority, i.e. government, ministry, administration or agency, or another public authority operating at national or regional level that is directly subordinated to a national or regional government, ministry or administration and exercises public functions under delegation of power given by this national or regional government, ministry or administration; they must have statutory responsibility in the field of fostering, promoting and/or supporting entrepreneurship,

| — | chambers of commerce and industry, chambers of handicrafts or similar bodies, |
| --- | --- |

—

chambers of commerce and industry, chambers of handicrafts or similar bodies,

| — | business support organisations and start-up centres, |
| --- | --- |

—

business support organisations and start-up centres,

| — | business associations and business support networks, |
| --- | --- |

—

business associations and business support networks,

| — | public and private entities offering business support services. |
| --- | --- |

—

public and private entities offering business support services.

Lot 1: Public authorities can submit individual applications. Applicants that are not public authorities must act in consortium (i.e. a European partnership) with at least one partner body from another EU country (i.e. a minimum of two bodies).

Lot 2: Applicants must act individually.

Applicants must be established in an EU Member State.

Entities from EFTA/EEA (1) and candidate (2) countries are admitted to Lot 1 for participating as project partners of a European partnership. This does not change the minimum requirement of two partners from different EU Member States as regards European partnerships. No grants can be awarded to partners in those countries in the framework of the present preparatory action.

3.   Budget and project duration

The total budget earmarked for the cofinancing of projects amounts to EUR 4 300 000. Financial assistance from the Commission cannot exceed 90 % of the total eligible costs.

Lot 1: No grant will amount to more than EUR 140 000. The maximum duration of projects is 18 months.

Up to EUR 1 000 000 will be given to European partnerships and national and regional public authorities that are located in an EU Member State that is not yet covered by the mobility scheme (3).

Lot 2: The maximum grant will be EUR 300 000. The maximum duration of the project is 22 months.

Activities of lot 1 and lot 2 must start on 1st January 2010.

4.   Deadline

Applications must be submitted to the Commission no later than 29 May 2009.

5.   Further information

The full text of the call for proposals and the application forms are accessible via the following website:

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/entrepreneurship/support_measures/erasmus/

Applications must comply with the requirements set out in the full text and be submitted using the form provided.

---

(1)  Republic of Iceland, Principality of Liechtenstein, Kingdom of Norway, Swiss Confederation.

(2)  Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Turkey.

(3)  Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Latvia, The Netherlands and Slovenia.

---

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

Commission

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/28

---

Decision taken by Serbia to implement unilaterally the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the Republic of Serbia

2009/C 83/11

Community traders are hereby informed of the trade regime in place with the Republic of Serbia.

As of 30 January 2009 the Serbian authorities have decided to implement unilaterally the trade concessions in the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the Republic of Serbia signed on 29 April 2008 but provisionally not implemented by the European Community. In case of exports of Community originating goods to Serbia, these goods may benefit from liberalised tariffs, on submission of either a movement certificate EUR.1 or an invoice declaration proving the Community origin of the goods concerned. The conditions of the unilateral implementation of the Interim Agreement in Serbia are specified in the Law of 21 January 2009 amending the Customs Tariff Law (1).

Exporters are informed that, by virtue of Decree of 5 February 2009 amending Decree on customs approved treatment of customs goods, release of customs goods and collection of customs debt (2), this preferential treatment is granted on the basis of the rules of origin identical to the ones provided for in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (3). Exporters are nevertheless advised to consult relevant customs laws of Serbia.

In case of imports of Serbian originating goods in the Community, goods remain subject to the provisions of the European Community autonomous trade regime provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2000 of 18 September 2000 introducing exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the European Union's Stabilisation and Association process, amending Regulation (EC) No 2820/98, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1763/1999 and (EC) No 6/2000 (4). This Regulation is implemented on the basis of the rules of origin laid down in Part I, Title IV, Chapter 2, Section 2 of abovementioned Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (namely Articles 98 to 123), including provisions on the issue of proofs of origin for Community goods where these goods are exported to beneficiary countries such as Serbia (Articles 110(5) and 116).

---

(1)  Official Journal of the Republic of Serbia, No 5/09, 22.1.2009.

(2)  Official Journal of the Republic of Serbia, No 9/09, 6.2.2009.

(3)  OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 240, 23.9.2000, p. 1.

---

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/29

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5473 — Fincantieri/ABB/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/12

| 1. | On 31 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Fincantieri — Cantieri Navali Italiani S.p.A. (‘Fincantieri’, Italy) and ABB S.p.A. (‘ABB’, Italy) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of a newly created company constituting a joint venture ('JV') by way of transfer of shares and assets. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 31 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Fincantieri — Cantieri Navali Italiani S.p.A. (‘Fincantieri’, Italy) and ABB S.p.A. (‘ABB’, Italy) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of a newly created company constituting a joint venture ('JV') by way of transfer of shares and assets.

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Fincantieri: shipbuilding, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Fincantieri: shipbuilding,

| — | for ABB: provision of power and automation technologies, |
| --- | --- |

—

for ABB: provision of power and automation technologies,

| — | for JV: development, manufacture and sale of marine automation systems. |
| --- | --- |

—

for JV: development, manufacture and sale of marine automation systems.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5473 — Fincantieri/ABB/JV, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5473 — Fincantieri/ABB/JV, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/30

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5499 — IPIC/NOVA)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/13

| 1. | On 31 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking International Petroleum Investment Company (‘IPIC’, United Arab Emirates) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking NOVA Chemicals Corporation (‘NOVA’, Canada) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 31 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking International Petroleum Investment Company (‘IPIC’, United Arab Emirates) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking NOVA Chemicals Corporation (‘NOVA’, Canada) by way of purchase of shares.

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for IPIC: investment company concentrating on petroleum refining and related upstream and downstream distribution and service networks, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for IPIC: investment company concentrating on petroleum refining and related upstream and downstream distribution and service networks,

| — | for NOVA: ethylene, polyethylene and chemical and energy co-products, styrene-based polymers. |
| --- | --- |

—

for NOVA: ethylene, polyethylene and chemical and energy co-products, styrene-based polymers.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5499 — IPIC/NOVA, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5499 — IPIC/NOVA, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

---

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/31

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5488 — Magna/Cadence Innovation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/14

| 1. | On 27 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Magna Presstec AG, a subsidiary of Magna International INC (‘Magna’, Austria) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Cadence Innovation s.r.o (‘Cadence’, Czech Republic) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 27 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Magna Presstec AG, a subsidiary of Magna International INC (‘Magna’, Austria) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Cadence Innovation s.r.o (‘Cadence’, Czech Republic) by way of purchase of shares.

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Magna: automotive supplier, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Magna: automotive supplier,

| — | for Cadence: automotive supplier. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Cadence: automotive supplier.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5488 — Magna/Cadence Innovation, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5488 — Magna/Cadence Innovation, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/32

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5483 — Toshiba/Fujitsu HDD Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/15

| 1. | On 31 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Toshiba Corporation (‘Toshiba’, Japan) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation sole control of Fujitsu Limited's HDD Business (‘Fujitsu's HDD Business’, Japan) by way of purchase of shares and assets. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 31 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Toshiba Corporation (‘Toshiba’, Japan) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation sole control of Fujitsu Limited's HDD Business (‘Fujitsu's HDD Business’, Japan) by way of purchase of shares and assets.

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Toshiba: manufacturing of a diverse range of advanced electronic and electrical products, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Toshiba: manufacturing of a diverse range of advanced electronic and electrical products,

| — | for Fujitsu's HDD Business: manufacturing and marketing of hard disk drives (HDDs). |
| --- | --- |

—

for Fujitsu's HDD Business: manufacturing and marketing of hard disk drives (HDDs).

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5483 — Toshiba/Fujitsu HDD Business, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5483 — Toshiba/Fujitsu HDD Business, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---