alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. Hobbie *et al.*

No. 2227,

Okla. T.

Opinion Filed March 12, 1909.

(100 Pac. 540.)

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Grounds—Failure of Court to Agree. Where a majority of the Supreme Court cannot agree upon a question before the court for determination within six months after the submission of said cause, the same should be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

*Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; B. F. Burwell, Judge.*

Action between tbe Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United Workmen of Oklahoma and Gertrnde Hobbie and Mabel Hobbie, by next friend. From the judgment, the Grand Lodge brings erroT.

Dismissed.

*M. D. Lilly,*for plaintiff in error.

*Cowgill & Dunn*and *Blaheney & Maxey,*for defendants in error.

Pee CueiaM.

It is provided by section 3, art. 7, of the Constitution (Bunn’s Ed. § 171), that:

> *“A*majority of the members of the Supreme Court shall constitute a quorum, and the concurrence of the majority of said court shall be necessary to decide any question.”

In the above-styled cause two of the members of the court are of the opinion that the judgment of the court below ought to be affirmed, two are of the opinion that it ought to be reversed, and one is disqualified from sitting by reason of being counsel for one of the parties in the court below. A part of section 5 of the same article provides that:

> “The Supreme Court shall render a written opinion in each case within six months after said case shall have been submitted for decision.”

As the time for handing down an opinion in this case has *480practically expired, and the court stands as above stated, there seems to be no alternative bnt to dismiss the appeal.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal in the above-styled cause shall be dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Stroh, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Ritter, J.), rendered March 26, 1981, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defense was predicated on the lack of intent to commit murder. Here, where the photographs of the deceased victim were offered to prove defendant’s intent to commit murder and disprove the defense of justification, their admission into evi*197dence was proper *(see, People v Pobliner,*32 NY2d 356, *cert denied*416 US 905).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for review or without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.
#### Peter M. Zasso et al., Appellants, v Town of Kent et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from water contamination, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Beisheim, J.), dated August 19,1983, which, upon the motion of the defendants Putnam County and Putnam County Board of Health to dismiss the complaint as against them for nonjoinder of the State of New York as a necessary party, dismissed the complaint as against all defendants “without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to pursue their claim against the defendants in the Court of Claims”.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. *(See, Baisley v Town of Kent,*111 AD2d 299.) Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 7 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 7

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for the reappointment of Shirley Ann Jackson as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Shirley Ann Jackson of New York, is filled by reappointment of 
the incumbent for a term of 6 years, effective May 6, 2011.

            Passed the Senate March 15, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. J. RES. 7

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for the reappointment of Shirley Ann Jackson as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Deng Xiao Qiong, Chief Financial Officer of OVM
International Holding Corp. (the "Company") has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Report").

         The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the 12th day of August, 2002.


                                         /s/
                                         ----------------------------




                                         Name: Deng Xiao Qiong
                                               -----------------------------
                                         Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                                ----------------------------
Exhibit 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Oak Hill  Financial,  Inc. (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December  31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron
J. Copher,  Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Registrant.


 /s/ Ron J. Copher


Ron J. Copher
Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2006




                                       75
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00794- CV

Walter Lee Hall, Jr., Appellant

v. The Hon orable J. David P hill ips, i n both his O ff icial and P ersonal Capacities; The Honorable Rosem ary Lehm berg, in her Capacity as Distr ict At torney in and f or Travis County; and T he Honorable Gre g Ham ilton, in his Cap acity as Sheriff in an d f or Travis Co, Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 419 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 0-0 0378 7, H ONO RAB LE LO RA J. LI VINGSTO N, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Walter L ee Hall, J r. filed a bankruptc y petition in the U.S. Ba nkruptcy Court of t he W estern District of Tex as on J anuar y 24, 2011. We abated the appea l on J une 1, see Tex. R. App. P . 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, order ing H all to inform us within ten calenda r day s of the re solution of the bankruptc y proce eding or another event that would allow us to reinstate the appea l, w arning him that his failure to provide such notice would result in t h e ap p ea l ’s dismiss al for want of prosec ution. See id. R. 42.3. On J uly 15, we we re informed by appellee s that the bankruptc y had been dismiss ed on the bankruptc y trustee’ s motion and that Hall wa s b ar red from filing another bankruptc y petition f

or two y ear s. The bankruptc y court signe d the order of dismiss al on J une 28, but as of J uly 19, Hall had not informed this Court of the dismiss al. We dismiss the appea l for want of prose cution.__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Jul y

21, 2011

2
**Exhibit
      32.1**






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      Seasons Bancshares, Inc.







This
      3 rd day of
      May, 2006.








/s/
                William L. SuttonWilliam
                L. SuttonChief
                Executive Officer
# C_2019139EN.01009301.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/93

---

Action brought on 20 February 2019 — Kibelisa Ngambasai v Council

(Case T-112/19)

(2019/C 139/93)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Roger Kibelisa Ngambasai (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois, and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1940 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 6 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1940 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 6 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP;

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1931 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 6 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1931 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 6 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;

| — | rule that the provisions of Article 3(2)(a) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP and Article 2b(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) 1183/2005/EC are unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule that the provisions of Article 3(2)(a) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP and Article 2b(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) 1183/2005/EC are unlawful;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-103/19, Mende Omalanga v Council.

---
#### In the Matter of EDWARD A. FLECKENSTEIN, an attorney at law.

January 10, 1961.

For the order: *Mr. James F. McGovern, Jr.*

For the respondent: *Mr. Edward A. Fleckenstein, pro se.*

Respondent suspended until the further order of the court. Opinion reported at 34 *N. J.*20.
#### RUTHENBERG, Respondent, v. COLLINS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 2, 1907.)

Action by August W. L. Ruthenberg against Newton M. Collins and another.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Case 10-00077 Doc 1 Filed 01/04/10 Entered 01/04/10 14:14:24 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Case 10-00077 Doc 1 Filed 01/04/10 Entered 01/04/10 14:14:24 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Case 10-00077 Doc 1 Filed 01/04/10 Entered 01/04/10 14:14:24 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
IIA 

Calendar No. 295 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 34 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exercise of authority to increase 

the debt limit, as submitted under section 3101A of title 31, United 

States Code, on January 12, 2012. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2012 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. LEE, Mr. HATCH, Mr. 

BARRASSO, Mr. CORNYN, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. MORAN, Mr. ALEXANDER, 

Mr. CRAPO, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. COATS, Mr. ENZI, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. 

BURR, Mr. VITTER, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. KYL, 

Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. WICKER, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. LUGAR, 

Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. KIRK, and 

Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 

twice and placed on the calendar, pursuant to Public Law 112–25, section 301(a)(2) 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exercise of 

authority to increase the debt limit, as submitted under 

section 3101A of title 31, United States Code, on January 12, 2012. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves of the President’s exercise of 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 34 PCS 

1 authority to increase the debt limit on January 12, 2012, 

2 as exercised pursuant to the certification under section 

3 3101A(a) of title 31, United States Code. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 295 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 34 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exerUnited States Code, on January 12, 2012. submitted under section 3101A of title 31, cise of authority to increase the debt limit, as 

JANUARY 23, 2012 

Read twice and placed on the calendar, pursuant to 

Public Law 112–25, section 301(a)(2) 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM MALTESE, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

June 2, 1960.

*Messrs. Levy, Lemlcen & MarguUes*for the petitioner.

*Mr. Arthur 8. Meredith*and *Mr. Michael R. Imbriani*for the respondent.

Denied.
#### Gail Evra and Another, as Executrices of Samuel Evra, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v Hillcrest General Hospital et al., Defendants, and Arnold Freed, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., sustained as a result of alleged medical malpractice, defendant Arnold Freed appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), entered June 1, 1984, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the action as against him as time barred.

Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion for summary judgment dismissing the action as against appellant Freed granted, action dismissed as against him, and action against the remaining defendants severed.

The action is time barred as against Freed (CPLR 214-a), since it was commenced more than two and a half years after Freed’s only involvement. An exception could have been made if Glassman’s subsequent treatment (deemed to be continuous for purposes of this motion) was imputable to Freed *(McDermott v Torre,*56 NY2d 399; *Borgia v City of New York,*12 NY2d 151). Glassman’s treatment could be so imputed only if plaintiffs showed that there was a relevant relationship between Freed and Glassman, such as principal-agent or employer-employee or a continuing relationship between Freed and the patient *(McDermott v Torre, supra,*p 403; *Watkins v Fromm,*108 AD2d 233).

No such link is present in this case. Nor can plaintiffs show even an indirect relationship between Freed and Glassman through their connections with Hillcrest. Glassman was an independent doctor affiliated with but not employed by Hill-, crest. This is insufficient to impute Glassman’s conduct to Hill-crest *(Ruane v Niagara Falls Mem. Med. Center,*60 NY2d 908). Furthermore, while Freed was employed by Hillcrest, this employment ceased in July 1978, or more than two and a half years prior to commencement of this action. The policies underlying the continuous treatment doctrine ceased to apply to Freed after that time *(see, McDermott v Torre, supra,*p 408).

*741Accordingly, the action should be dismissed as against Freed. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Lease Addendum



 EXHIBIT 4.20 
 ADDENDUM TO LEASE 
 THIS ADDENDUM TO LEASE is made and entered into this 28 of July 2009 buy
and between CENTER FAMILY, LTD. (“Lanlord”), and UNILENS CORP. U.S.A. (“Tenant”); 
 WITNESSETH

 WHEREAS, the parties hereto did enter into a Lease Agreement dated as of the 8th, day of May, 2006, for the premises located at 28163 US 19 North,
Suite 205, Clearwater, FL 33761; 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend certain sections of said Lease in the manner
hereinafter provided. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable
consideration, each in hand paid to the other, the receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby acknowledged, LANDLORD and TENENT do hereby agree as follows: 
 IT IS AGREED, that the original lease be and hereby is amended in the following respects: 
 THE TERM OF THE LEASE shall be extended thirty-six (36) months commencing August 1, 2009 through July 31, 2012. 
 THE BASE MONTHLY RENTAL AMOUNT shall be fixed at two thousand one hundred ninety dollars and no cents ($2,190.00), plus applicable sales tax. 
 In years two and three of the renewal, Tenant is subject to its’ prorata share of any increase in operating expenses over the operating
expense base for year ending 2009. 
 ALL OF THE terms, covenants, conditions, and provisions of said Lease, except as herein
specifically amended shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby adopted and reaffirmed by the parties hereto. 
 THIS
AGREEMENT shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this 28 day of July, 2009. 
  

									
	WITNESS:	 		 	 “TENANT”
 UNILENS COPR. USA

				
	 	 		 	BY	 	/s/ Michael J. Pecora
	 	 		 		 	 Michael J. Pecora
 Chief
Financial Officer

			
		 		 	 “LANDLORD”
 CENTER FAMILY, LTD.

				
	 	 		 	BY	 	/s/ Laura Martins
	 	 		 		 	 Laura Martins, As Agent
 Center Family, Ltd.


  

 116
EXHIBIT32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

David E. Hershberg, Chief Executive Officer of GlobecommSystems Inc., and Andrew C. Melfi, Chief Financial Officer of GlobecommSystems Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of GlobecommSystems Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December31,  2006 (the  ‘‘QuarterlyReport’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Globecomm SystemsInc.

|                        |  |  |        |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|------------------------|--|--|--------|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: February  9,2007 |  |  | By:    |  |  | /s/ DAVID E.HERSHBERG                                                                     |
|                   |  |  |   |  |  | DavidE. Hershberg                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                   |  |  |   |  |  | Chairman of the BoardandChief ExecutiveOfficer                                                                                                                                                                    |
|                   |  |  | By:    |  |  | /s/ANDREW C.MELFI                                 |
|                   |  |  |   |  |  | AndrewC. Melfi                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|                   |  |  |   |  |  | Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officerand Treasurer                                                                                                                                                               |
|                        |

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Globecomm Systems Inc. and will be retained by GlobecommSystems Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of StarTek, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned individual, certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1)              The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The information contained the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Date: July 31,  2009 | /s/ A. LAURENCE JONES                                            |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | A. Laurence Jones                                                |
|                      | President and Chief  Executive Officer                           |
|                      |                                                             |
|                      |                                                             |
| Date: July 31,  2009 | /s/ DAVID G. DURHAM                                              |
|                      | David G. Durham                                                  |
|                      | Executive Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and will be retainedby the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----