alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38472-38473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-832-001.
    Applicants: Tapstone Energy, LLC, FP Wheeler Midstream, LLC.
    Description: Petition to Amend Temporary Waiver of Capacity Release 
Regulations, et al. of Tapstone Energy, LLC et al.
    Filed Date: 7/13/21.
    Accession Number: 20210713-5135.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/26/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-964-000.
    Applicants: Saltville Gas Storage Company L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: ROFR Agreement Definition 
Modification to be effective 8/13/2021.
    Filed Date: 7/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210714-5121.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/26/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-965-000.
    Applicants: East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: ROFR Agreement Definition 
Modification to be effective 8/13/2021.
    Filed Date: 7/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210714-5124.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/26/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests,

[[Page 38473]]

service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 15, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15510 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### In the Matter of Joel P. Kastein, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

June 2, 1986

*408APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr. (Robert P. Guido*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Abruzzo, Clancy & Hayes (Ludwig Abruzzo*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on October 14, 1964.

In this proceeding to discipline the respondent for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and the respondent submits an “affirmation in partial opposition”. The Special Referee found the respondent guilty of converting escrow moneys amounting to $5,600 to his own use and benefit and failing to pay a fuel oil bill, as instructed by his clients, out of the proceeds of the escrow deposit, and failing to deliver to his clients a closing statement summarizing and accounting for the transfer of funds involved in the underlying real estate transaction, although requested by his clients to do so.

After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in full agreement with the findings of the Special Referee. The respondent is guilty of the professional misconduct set forth above. The petitioner’s motion to confirm the Special Referee’s report is granted.

In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed with respect to the charges of which the respondent has been found guilty, we are mindful of the fact that by letter dated January 12, 1983, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District issued a letter of admonition to the respondent for his actions in failing to maintain proper escrow accounts and for failing to cooperate with a legitimate investigation of the Grievance Committee.

Accordingly, the respondent should be, and hereby is, disbarred and the clerk of the court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 00-30014

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

PAULINE DOUGLAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

COTTONLAND RESTAURANT, Etc., ET.AL.,

Defendants,

BONO ENTERPRISES; COTTONLAND IN N; COTTONLAND

RESTAURANT; AMERICAN CENTRAL INSURANCE CO; J. L.

C O OK, doing business as Cottonland Inn, doing business as Bono

Enterprises,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-2218

November 28, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

-2- PER CURIAM: *

Pauline Douglas injured her left f oot, left ankle, and back in a fall on the steps at the

Cottonland Inn. Douglas alleges that the cause of the fall was either two grapes left on the steps that

precipitate d her slip, or cracks on the steps that caught the heel of her shoe (or a combination of

both). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Cottonland because Douglas

provided no evidence that the grapes had been present for a length of time sufficient to put

Cottonland on constructive notice. We now affirm.

On appeal Douglas makes two basic arguments as to why summary judgment was

inappropri a te. First, she argues that the steps were defective insofar as they were cracked,

independent of the presence of the grapes. This argument fails, however, because parties are not

permitted to allege new facts on appeal in order to overcome a summary judgment. S ee Smith v. Olin

Chemical Corp

. , 555 F.2d 1283, 1285 (5th Cir. 1977). On the record before us, Douglas’s own

deposition testimony forecloses the possibility of a crack theory when she states that while she did

see “maybe a little dent,” she was sure it was the grapes that caused her fall.

Second, Douglas argues there is a factual issue over whether Cottonland’s clean-up policies

were adequate. The cleaning staff at Cottonland departs between 2 and 4 p.m. daily; when they are

gone, inspection and clean-up becomes a residual responsibility of the operator of the inn. The lack

of formal clean-up procedures after a certain hour, however, do not relieve Douglas of her burden

of proving the temporal element of constructive notice. See Hernandez v. National Tea, Inc. , 734

So.2d 958, 960 (La.App.5 Cir. 1999) (lack of written inspection polic ies and clean-up training-3-

insufficient to prove constructive notice); cf. La. R ev. St at . Ann. § 2800.6(b)(3) (“In determining

reasonable care, the absence of a written or verbal uniform cleanup or safety procedure is insufficient,

alone, to prove failure to exercise reasonable care.”).

Because Douglas has failed to offer proof that the grapes were on the steps for any amount

of time before her fall, she has not met her burden of proving constructiv e notice, and sum m ary

judgment was appropriate.

AFFIRMED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIAM ST. CLAIRE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5194 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 3, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Frederick R. Hardt, Judge. Philip L. Reizenstein of Woodward and Reizenstein, PA, Miami, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,Tallahassee, and Laurie Marie BenoitKnox, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
S. Con. Res. 58 Agreed to August 7, 2012

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 4240) an Act to 

reauthorize the North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004, and 

for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall 

make the following correction: in section 7, insert ‘‘is amended’’ 

before ‘‘by striking’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 45 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 45

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for an event to award the Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to 
                      the Montford Point Marines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2012

     Mrs. Hagan (for herself and Mr. Burr) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for an event to award the Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to 
                      the Montford Point Marines.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO AWARD THE 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on June 27, 2012, to award the 
Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the Montford Point Marines.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT


 


This
Amendment amends the Zale Corporation Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation
Plan (the “Plan”) as heretofore amended.


 


WHEREAS,
the members of the Board of Directors of Zale Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), are compensated in part through awards under the
Plan;


 


WHEREAS,
the Plan currently provides that awards of options pursuant to Section 7
of the Plan shall have an exercise price equal to the “Fair Market Value” (as
defined in the plan) of a share of Company stock on the date the option is
granted; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors concluded that it is in the best interests of the
Company’s shareholders to amend the Plan to permit awards with exercise prices
above, and not just equal to, the Fair Market Value, and approved such
amendment.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof the Plan is amended as follows:


 


1.             Section 7(a) of
the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:  “The exercise price per share of an Option
shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock on the
date the Option is granted.”


 


2.             Except as amended
hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this amendment as of the
23rd day of December, 2009.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  ZALE
  CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Its:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 29 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 29

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the United States Capitol for an 
event to present the Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to Neil A. 
  Armstrong, Edwin E. ``Buzz'' Aldrin, Jr., Michael Collins, and John 
Herschel Glenn, Jr., in recognition of their significant contributions 
                              to society.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2011

 Mr. Nelson of Florida (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Brown of Ohio, 
 Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Lieberman, and 
 Mr. Durbin) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the United States Capitol for an 
event to present the Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to Neil A. 
  Armstrong, Edwin E. ``Buzz'' Aldrin, Jr., Michael Collins, and John 
Herschel Glenn, Jr., in recognition of their significant contributions 
                              to society.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL TO PRESENT 
              THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.

    (a) Authorization.--The rotunda of the United States Capitol is 
authorized to be used on November 16, 2011 for the presentation of the 
Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to Neil A. Armstrong, Edwin E. 
``Buzz'' Aldrin, Jr., Michael Collins, and John Herschel Glenn, Jr., in 
recognition of their significant contributions to society.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 4, 2021.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *The Richard R. Drake Family Trust—B, Radcliffe, Iowa; Cynthia A. Shirar, Marshalltown, Iowa; Edwin A. Drake, West Des Moines, Iowa; and Bryan S. Drake, Radcliffe, Iowa; all individually and as co-trustees;*                     to join the Drake Family Control Group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Drake Holding Company, and indirectly retain voting shares of Security State Bank, both of Radcliffe, Iowa.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 15, 2021.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-15384 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2019139EN.01010501.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/105 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/105

---

Action brought on 28 February 2019 — Off-White v EUIPO (OFF-WHITE)

(Case T-133/19)

(2019/C 139/107)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Off-White LLC (Springfield, Illinois, United States) (represented by: M. Decker, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark OFF-WHITE — Application for registration No 17 360 009

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 December 2018 in Case R 580/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in any event, order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred OFF-WHITE LLC before the present Court and the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred OFF-WHITE LLC before the present Court and the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | The contested decision did not take into account previous practice and violates the legal principles of sound administration, legal certainty and equal treatment. |
| --- | --- |

—

The contested decision did not take into account previous practice and violates the legal principles of sound administration, legal certainty and equal treatment.

| — | Infringement of Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9057-4]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed July 2, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through July 12, 2021 10 a.m. EST 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20210095, Draft, FHWA, NY,*                     Interstate 81 Viaduct Project,  Comment Period Ends: 09/14/2021, Contact: Richard J. Marquis 518-431-4127.                

*EIS No. 20210096, Final, AZDOT, FHWA, AZ,*                     Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Section 4(f) Evaluation for Interstate 11 Corridor between Nogales and Wickenburg, Arizona,  Review Period Ends: 08/16/2021, Contact: Alan Hansen 602-382-8964.                

*EIS No. 20210097, Draft, FERC, AZ,*                     North Baja Xpress Project,  Comment Period Ends: 08/30/2021, Contact: Office of External Affairs 866-208-3372.                

*EIS No. 20210098, Draft, VA, PRO,*                     Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Veterans Affairs Housing Loan Program,  Comment Period Ends: 08/30/2021, Contact: Elysium Drumm 202-632-8862.                

Dated: July 12, 2021.

Cindy S. Barger,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2021-15134 Filed 7-15-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF JIM HAGEMANN SNABE, CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SAP AG

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SAP AG (the Company) on Form 20-F for the
period ending December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |        |  |                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------
|Date March 22, 2012 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jim Hagemann Snabe    
|                    |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Jim Hagemann Snabe        
|                    |  |  |  | Title: |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.