alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Lam Sai Wing, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the
Quarterly Report of S.W. Lam, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) information contained in such
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of S.W. Lam, Inc.


                                            By:   /s/ Lam Sai Wing
                                             ---------------------------
                                            Name: Lam Sai Wing
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                            February 19, 2003

I, Chan Yam Fai, Jane, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the
Quarterly Report of S.W. Lam, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) information contained in such
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of S.W. Lam, Inc.


                                              By:    /s/ Chan Yam Fai, Jane
                                              Name: Chan Yam Fai, Jane
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                              February 19, 2003
# C_2020339EN.01001501.xml

| 12.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 –Zubedi v Council

(Case T-186/19) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Syria - Freezing of funds - Error of assessment)

(2020/C 339/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Khaled Zubedi (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: M. Lester, QC, and M. O’Kane, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and A. Limonet, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2019/87 of 21 January 2019 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2019 L 18 I, p. 13) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/85 of 21 January 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2019 L 18 I, p. 4), in so far as those measures relate to the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Khaled Zubedi to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Khaled Zubedi to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
HAFER & GILMER
                         Certified Public Accountants
                         251 Royal Palm Way, Suite 302
                        Palm Beach, Florida  33480-4310

                          Telephone:  (561) 655-8700
                          Facsimile:  (561) 655-6964



September 12, 2000


The Board of Directors
eCom eCom.com, Inc.
3801 PGA Boulevard, Suite 1001
Palm Beach Gardens, FL  33410

We consent to the use of our report dated August 24, 1999 appearing in the
Annual Report on form 10-KSB of eCom eCom.com, Inc. for the year ended May 31,
2000.


Sincerely,

/s/ Phil B. Gilmer
Phil B. Gilmer
Hafer & Gilmer


























<PAGE>




                                HOOD & STRONG, LLP
                           Certified Public Accountants


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
E COM ECOM.COM
3801 PGA Blvd., Suite 1001
Palm Beach Gardens, FL  33410

We consent to the use of our report of Star Dot Marketing, Inc., dated
September 10, 1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of eCom
eCom.com, Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2000.




/s/ Hood & Strong LLP

September 12, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 139 (Friday, July 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 39018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15678]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9057-5]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed July 12, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through July 19, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210099, Draft Supplement, CHSRA, CA, California High-Speed 
Rail San Francisco to San Jose Project Section Revised Draft 
Environmental Impact Report/Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement, Comment Period Ends: 09/08/2021, Contact: Scott Rothenberg 
916-403-6936.
EIS No. 20210100, Draft, FERC, LA, Evangeline Pass Expansion Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 09/07/2021, Contact: Office of External Affairs 
866-208-3372.

Amended Notice

EIS No. 20210051, Draft, USN, CA, Navy Old Town Campus Revitalization, 
Comment Period Ends: 08/12/2021, Contact: Ron Bochenek 619-705-5560.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 05/14/2021; Extending the Comment 
Period from 07/13/2021 to 08/12/2021.

EIS No. 20210078, Draft, UDOT, UT, Little Cottonwood Canyon 
Environmental Impact Statement Wasatch Boulevard to Alta, Comment 
Period Ends: 09/03/2021, Contact: Josh Van Jura 801-231-8452.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 06/25/2021; Extending the Comment 
Period from 08/09/2021 to 09/03/2021.

    Dated: July 19, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-15678 Filed 7-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
IIA 

Calendar No. 361 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 36 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor Relations 

Board relating to representation election procedures. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2012 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. 

BLUNT, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BURR, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COATS, Mr. 

COBURN, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HATCH, Mr. 

HELLER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ISAKSON, 

Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, Mr. KYL, Mr. LEE, Mr. 

LUGAR, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. MORAN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

PORTMAN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. 

SHELBY, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. THUNE, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. VITTER, Mr. 

WICKER, and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following joint resolution; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Committee discharged pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c); placed on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the National Labor Relations Board relating to representation election procedures. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 36 PCS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Na4 tional Labor Relations Board relating to representation 

5 election procedures (published at 76 Fed. Reg. 80138 (De6 cember 22, 2011)), and such rule shall have no force or 

7 effect. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 361 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 36 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapdures. Board relating to representation election proce- submitted by the National Labor Relations ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Committee discharged pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c); 

placed on the calendar 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Steven Neil, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[944 NYS2d 533]—

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered January 14, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs motion to amend the caption to reflect the true names of the correction officers designated as the “Doe” defendants, and granted the City defendants’ cross motion to dismiss plaintiffs federal civil rights *609claims under 42 USC § 1983 as against the “Doe” defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It is undisputed that plaintiff’s federal civil rights claims against the “Doe” defendants are time-barred. Although the IAS court did not specifically address the issue, we find that the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not act to bar any of the defendants from raising the statute of limitations as a defense to plaintiff’s federal claims. Initially, equitable estoppel does not apply to the “Doe” defendants, as it is the City, not the “Doe” defendants, who are alleged to have concealed the names of the two correction officers involved in the alleged assault. In any event, the application of equitable estoppel would be inappropriate as a matter of law, since plaintiff has failed to show due diligence in ascertaining the names of the officers *(see Pahlad v Brustman,*33 AD3d 518, 520 [2006], *affd*8 NY3d 901 [2007]). Further, there is no evidence in the record that defendants lulled plaintiff into inaction in order to allow the statute of limitations to expire *(East Midtown Plaza Hous. Co. v City of New*York, 218 AD2d 628, 628 [1995]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Catterson, Moskowitz, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1 Independent Auditors Consent The Supervisory Board
   SAP Aktiengesellschaft Systeme, Anwendungen, Produkte in der
Datenverarbeitung: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-60399, 333-65083, 333-30380, 333-41762, 333-63496, 333-63464
and 333-102564) of SAP Aktiengesellschaft Systeme, Anwendungen, Produkte in der
Datenverarbeitung and subsidiaries (SAP AG) of our report dated February 27,
2004, except for Note 38 which
is as of March 23, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of SAP AG as of December
31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes
in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 2003, and the 2003 and 2002 information contained in
the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December
31, 2003, annual report on Form 20-F of SAP AG. Our report refers to the change
in SAP AGs method of accounting for goodwill and intangible assets in 2002. Our report refers to our audit of the disclosures added to revise the 2001
consolidated financial statements, as more fully described in Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements and to our audit of the adjustments that were
applied to the 2001 consolidated financial statements, as more fully described
in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements. However, we were not
engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 consolidated
financial statements other than with respect to such disclosures and
adjustments. KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Mannheim, Germany
March 23, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Science and Engineering Policy hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business as follows: 

# TIME AND DATE: 

Friday, July 23, 2021, from 1:00-2:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda of the teleconference is: Chair's opening remarks; discussion of proposed key themes and Board policy messages to accompany the release of Science & Engineering Indicators 2022.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. To listen to this teleconference, members of the public must send an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference. The National Science                               ( print page 38363)                            Board Office will send requesters a toll-free dial-in number. Meeting information and updates may be found at the National Science Board website                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office. 

[FR Doc. 2021-15519 Filed 7-16-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 55 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 55

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1627.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2012

  Mr. Harkin submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1627.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1627) an Act to amend title 
38, United States Code, to furnish hospital care and medical services 
to veterans who were stationed at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, while 
the water was contaminated at Camp Lejeune, to improve the provision of 
housing assistance to veterans and their families, and for other 
purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 
following correction: in section 201, strike ``Andrew Connelly'' and 
insert ``Andrew Connolly''.
                                 <all>
```
#### State Division of Human Rights, on the Complaint of Mary Zapszal, Petitioner, v Buffalo Columbus Hospital, Respondent.

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298, petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights that there is no probable cause to believe that respondent unlawfully discriminated against her in employment on account of disability and sex. She contends that the investigation conducted by the Division was inadequate to support the determination. We disagree.

The investigation included interviews with petitioner and other employees at respondent’s facility, as well as a review of personnel records, correspondence and other pertinent documents. The determination that there is no probable cause for petitioner’s complaint has a rational basis in the record and is thus not arbitrary or capricious *(State Div. of Human Rights v County of Erie,*107 AD2d 1042; *State Div. of Human Rights v Stanmor Liq. Co.,*107 AD2d 1056). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE 

RESTATED 

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF

VANGUARD AIRLINES, INC.

 

Vanguard Airlines Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

1.	The name of the corporation is Vanguard Airlines, Inc.

2.	The date on which the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware is November 2, 1995.

3.	The Board of Directors of the corporation, acting in accordance with the provisions of Sections 141(f) and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, adopted resolutions to amend Article IV, Section (a) in its entirety to read as follows:

4.	(a) The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is two hundred two million (202,000,000) shares, of which (i) two hundred million (200,000,000) shares, of the par value of $0.001 per share, shall be denominated "Common Stock" and (ii) two million (2,000,000) shares, of the par value of $0.001 per share, shall be denominated "Preferred Stock."

5.	Thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors, this Certificate of Amendment was submitted to the stockholders of the corporation for their approval in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,**VANGUARD AIRLINES, INC. has caused this certificate to be executed, signed and acknowledged by Robert J. Spane, its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and attested by Brian S. Gillman, its Secretary, as of the eighteenth day of May, 1998.

VANGUARD AIRLINES, INC.

 

 

Robert J. Spane

Chairman of the Board, Chief 

				Executive Officer and President

 

ATTEST:

 

 

Brian S. Gillman

Secretary
#### Araksya Ter GHUKASYAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-70194.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.*

Filed Dec. 30, 2008.

Law Office of Aris Artounians, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San *370Francisco, CA, Douglas E. Ginsburg, Lyle Jentzer, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. Petr. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Araksya Ter Ghukasyan, a native of Iran and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence adverse credibility findings, *Mejia-Paiz v. INS,*111 F.3d 720, 723 (9th Cir.1997), and de novo claims of due process violations, *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because the IJ had reason to question Ter Ghukasyan’s credibility and Ter Ghukasyan failed to produce non-duplicative, material, easily available corroborating evidence of her Jehovah’s Witness baptism, and she did not provide a credible explanation for this failure. *See Sidhu v. INS,*220 F.3d. 1085, 1092 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, Ter Ghukasyan’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s denial of Ter Ghukasyan’s CAT claim because this claim is based on the same statements that the IJ found to be not credible, and Ter Ghukasyan points to no other evidence she claims the agency should have considered in making its CAT determination. *See id.*at 1157.

We reject Ter Ghukasyan’s due process contention because she does not identify any error of law by the agency. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-04-00217- CR

In re Jam es Earl Crayt on

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL CO UNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 47417 , HO NORAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESI DING

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
J ames Ea rl Cray ton is ser v ing a

prison sentenc e for

ag g ravated sexual assault. He filed a motion for post-c onviction DNA testing
. See Te x. Cod e Cr im. Pr oc . A nn . a rt . 6 4. 01 (We st Supp. 2004-05). The State filed a re sponse urg ing, a mong othe r thing s, that identity is not an issue in thi s c a se . A tta c he d to the mot ion wa s a c op y of Cr ay ton ’s wr itt e n s ta te me nt t o th e po lic e , in which he a dmitted having se x ual interc ourse with the c omplainant but asserte d th at it was
consensua l. The district court denie d the motion for testing
. Se e id . art. 64.03(a )(1) (B ). This appe al followed. Ap pe lla

nt’ s c ourt -a

pp oin ted atto rn e y

fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ingthat th e a pp e a l is frivolous and without mer it. The brief me ets the re quirements of An de rs v. Cal ifo rn ia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), b y p r e s e n ti n g a p r o f e s s io n a l e v a lu a ti o n o f th e r e c o r d d e mo n s tr a ti n g w h y th e r e ar e no arguable gr ounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 48 8 U .S. 75 (1 98 8) ; Hi gh v . S tat e , 573 S.W. 2d 80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tat e , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);2

J ac k so n v . S tat e , 4 85 S.W. 2d 55 3 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tat e , 4 3 6 S. W. 2 d

1 3 7 ( T e x. Crim. App. 1969).

Appellant has f

iled a pro se brief. We ha ve ca ref ull y considere d the fa ctual alleg ations made in this brief a nd find no basis for disag ree ing w ith the district court’s finding that identity w a s an d is n o t an is s u e . We f in d n o th in g in th e r e c o r d th a t mi g h t ar g u a b ly support the appea l. Counsel’s motion t o withdraw is g rante d.

The district cour

t’s order is affirme d.

__________________________________________ W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice B e fo re Chi e f Jus tic e L aw, Justi c e s K idd and B . A . Sm ith Affir med Filed: De cembe r 2, 2004 Do No t Pu

bli sh