alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021128EN.01003301.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Santini and Others v Parliament

(Joined Cases T-345/19, T-346/19, T-364/19 to T-366/19, T-372/19 to T-375/19, and T-385/19) (1)

(Institutional law - Single statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Resolution No 14/2018, on pensions - Alteration of the amount of the pensions of Italian national Members of Parliament - Corresponding alteration by the European Parliament of the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Competence of the author of the act - Obligation to state reasons - Acquired rights - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Right to property - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Non-contractual liability - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

(2021/C 128/39)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Giacomo Santini (Trento, Italy) and the nine other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: M. Paniz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the letters of 11 April 2019, as well as, in respect of the applicant in Case T-375/19, the letter of 8 May 2019, drawn up, in the case of each applicant, by the Parliament and concerning the adjustment of the amount of the pensions received by the applicants following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019, of Resolution No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) and, secondly, application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicants claim to have suffered as a result of those measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Mr Giacomo Santini and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Giacomo Santini and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1506

JUNIO CESAR FREITAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

DALE BALDWIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRADESMEN INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; UNIFIED CLEANROOM 

CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-1507

DALE BALDWIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

JUNIO CESAR FREITAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRADESMEN INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; UNIFIED CLEANROOM 

CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,

District Judge. (5:12-cv-00116-FL)

Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Junio Cesar Freitas; Dale Baldwin, Appellants Pro Se. Kevin 

Joseph Dalton, FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Charlotte, North 

Carolina; Kevin Scott Joyner, Kimberly Joyce Lehman, OGLETREE, 

DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Junio Cesar Freitas and Dale Baldwin appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing their civil action. On appeal, we 

confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants’ 

briefs. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Appellants’ informal 

briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s 

disposition, they have forfeited appellate review of the court's 

order. Accordingly, we grant Appellants' motions to proceed in 

forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### MAURER v. FRIEDMAN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by Mary E. Maurer against Samuel Friedman and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7298

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONALD EUGENE SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-93-17-V, CA-01-114-2-5-V)

Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Johnson Bender, BENDER & MATUS, Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellant. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald Eugene Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-93-17-V; CA01-114-2-5-V (W.D.N.C. filed July 24, 2001 & entered July 25,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer and Director of New
Jersey Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: March 14, 2011

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCHFred W. Brackebusch,
President, Treasurer & Director

---
# C_2020390EN.01003301.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate v Commission

(Case T-549/19) (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Orphan medicinal products - Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan - Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products - Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 - Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ - Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 - Error of law)

(2020/C 390/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbH (Wedel, Germany) (represented by: P. von Czettritz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2019) 4858 final of 20 June 2019 granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Trecondi-treosulfan.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 5 of European Commission Implementing Decision C(2019) 4858 (final) of 20 June 2019 granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘Trecondi-treosulfan’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 5 of European Commission Implementing Decision C(2019) 4858 (final) of 20 June 2019 granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘Trecondi-treosulfan’;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.

---
Exhibit 99.2





Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of AHL Services, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Date: May 9, 2003



| |  | Name:  |  | /s/ Heinz Stubblefield 
| |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AHL Services, Inc. and will be retained by AHL Services Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Leeann S. and Another, Infants. Oneida County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Michael S., Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 846]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (James R. Griffith, J.), entered November 17, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, adjudicated the children to be abused and neglected.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition determining that he sexually abused his daughter and derivatively neglected his son. We reject the contention of the father that Family Court’s finding of sexual abuse is not supported by the requisite preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). “A child’s out-of-court statements may form the basis for a finding of [abuse] as long as they are sufficiently corroborated by [any] other evidence tending to support their reliability” *(Matter of Nicholas L.,*50 AD3d 1141, 1142 [2008]; *see*§ 1046 [a] [vi]). Here, the out-of-court statements of the daughter were sufficiently corroborated by the testimony of petitioner’s expert witness, who found the daughter’s consistent accounts of the abuse to be reliable and opined that her “statements parallel those normally made by abuse victims” *(Matter of Nikita W. [Michael W.],*77 AD3d 1209, 1210 [2010]; *see Matter of Thomas N.,*229 AD2d 666, 668 [1996]).

We reject the further contention of the father that the court erred in determining that he derivatively neglected his son. The record supports the determination of the court that the father’s sexual abuse of the daughter demonstrated “ ‘fundamental flaws in [his] understanding of the duties of parenthood’ ” and warranted a finding of derivative neglect with respect to the son *(Matter of Michelle M.,*52 AD3d 1284, 1284 [2008]; *see Matter of James A.,*217 AD2d 961 [1995]). Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
Exhibit 4.3



                   AMENDMENT TO RESTATED MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
                   ------------------------------------------

     This  Amendment to the Restated  Management  Agreement is made as of the 29
day of April,  2005, by and between Nordic American Tanker Shipping  Limited,  a
Bermuda company (the "Company"),  and Scandic American  Shipping Ltd., a Bermuda
company ("Scandic").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              --------------------

     WHEREAS, the Company and Scandic are parties to a management agreement
restated as of June 30, 2004, as further amended on October 12, 2004(the
"Restated Management Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, Section 2 of the Restated Management Agreement currently provides,
inter alia, that the term of the Restated Management Agreement shall terminate
on June 30, 2014, unless earlier terminated by the parties or unless extended by
the parties following mutual agreement; and

     WHEREAS, the Company and Scandic wish to amend Section 2 of the Restated
Management Agreement to extend the term of the Restatement Management Agreement
to June 30, 2019.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agreed as follows:

     1.   Section 2 of the Restated Management Agreement is hereby amended to
          read as follows:

          "The term of this Agreement shall commence on June 30, 2004 and shall
          terminate on June 30, 2019, unless earlier terminated pursuant to
          Section 6 hereof or unless extended by the parties following mutual
          agreement."

     2.   The Restated Management Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force
          and effect.
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment to the
Restated Management Agreement as of the date first above written.

                                        NORDIC AMERICAN TANKER
                                          SHIPPING LIMITED


                                        By /s/
                                              ------------------------
                                           Name:
                                           Title:



                                        SCANDIC AMERICAN SHIPPING LTD.


                                        By /s/
                                              ------------------------
                                           Name:
                                           Title:
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BABYLON R. CO. v. BOARD OF RAILROAD COM’RS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

*1132March 8, 1898.)

Action by the people of the ■state of New York, on the relation of the Baby-Ion Railroad Company, against the board of railroad commissioners.

No opinion. Order asked for granted.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 USC SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Medallion Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USCSection 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge: 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. 

By:  /s/ Alvin Murstein 

Chairman and 

Chief Executive Officer 

Date: March 5,2014 

 
72
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10- KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Becky T. Harrell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                               /s/ Becky T. Harrell
                                               --------------------
                                               Becky T. Harrell
                                               Chief Financial Officer,
                                               March 31, 2006

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has  been  provided  to  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Minden  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       -1-
# C_2021009EN.01003401.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/34

---

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2020 — DS and Others v Commission and EEAS

(Case T-573/19) (1)

(2021/C 9/49)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on May 25, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (“IEEE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 17 new standards have been initiated and 2 existing standards are being revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at:                     *https://standards.ieee.org/​about/​sasb/​sba/​may2021.html.*

                    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 5, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 11, 2021 (86 FR 25887).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2021-15815 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
#### In the Matter of CB Sports, Inc., Respondent, v Lund's Mens Shop, Inc., Doing Business as Lund's Ski and Sale, Appellant.

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for rea*975sons stated in memorandum decision at Special Term, Stone, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. — preaction discovery.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuantto the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute apart of the Quarterly Report of UTStarcom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/Afor the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”).

In connection withthe Report, we, Hong Liang Lu and Michael J. Sophie, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

Dated:  June 3, 2005
| By:    | /s/ HONG  LIANG LU                                                                               |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Hong Liang Lu                                                                              |   |
|   | Title: *President and Chief  Executive Officer*                                                  |   |
| By:    | /s/ MICHAEL J. SOPHIE                                                                            |   |
|   | Name: Michael J. Sophie                                                                          |   |
|   | Title: *Executive Vice President,  Chief Operating Officer, and  Acting Chief Financial Officer* |   |
|        |                                                                                                  |        |  |

 

  

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 950 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to repeal a prohibition on allowing 

States to use toll revenues as State matching funds for Appalachian 

Development Highway projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2011 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to repeal a prohibition on allowing States to use toll revenues as State 

matching funds for Appalachian Development Highway 

projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MATCHING FUNDS FOR APPALACHIAN DEVEL4 OPMENT HIGHWAY PROJECTS. 

5 Section 120(j)(1)(A) of title 23, United States Code, 

6 is amended by striking ‘‘and the Appalachian development 

7 highway system program under section 14501 of title 40’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS