alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ROSE HILLS COMPANY AND
SUBSIDIARIES, FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,139
<PP&E>                                          59,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,397
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   316,293
<SALES>                                         43,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,140
<CGS>                                           28,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                       588
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       613
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOSEPH WALLS

,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellant,

v.

BRUCE BURTON and

KOLAWOLE AKINBAYO

,

Defendants Below,

Appellee s

. §

§

§ No. 214 , 2019

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ C.A. No. N16A

- 10

- 012

§

§

§

§

§

Submitted: July 22 , 2019

Decided: July 26 , 2019

O R D E R

After the appellant, Joseph Walls

, filed this appeal, he filed a motion to

proceed in forma pauperis . This Court denied that motion on June 5 , 2019 , under

10 Del. C. § 8804(f)

. The Court ordered that if Walls did not pay the filing fee on

or before June 20 , 2019, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice. On

June 18, 2019, this Court granted a request by Walls for an extension of time to pay

the filing fee. The Court ordered that if Walls did not pay the filing fee by July 20,

2019, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice. Walls did not pay the

filing fee by July 20 , 2019.2

N OW, THEREFORE, IT IS OR DERED, under Supreme Court Rule 3(b) (2)

,

that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
# C_2020137EN.01002801.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/28

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 27 December 2019 — AS ‘4finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

(Case C-944/19)

(2020/C 137/38)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant at first instance and appellant on a point of law: AS ‘4finance’

Respondent in the appeal proceedings: Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’, defined in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102 EEC, (1) an autonomous concept of EU law? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’, defined in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102 EEC, (1) an autonomous concept of EU law?

| 2. | Are the costs of extending the credit included in the concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102 EEC, in circumstances such as those of the present case, if the clauses on extending the credit form part of the terms and conditions of the credit agreement agreed by the borrower and the lender? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are the costs of extending the credit included in the concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102 EEC, in circumstances such as those of the present case, if the clauses on extending the credit form part of the terms and conditions of the credit agreement agreed by the borrower and the lender?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.

---
# C_2019122EN.01002702.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/27

---

Action brought on 12 February 2019 — Dekoback v EUIPO — DecoPac (DECOPAC)

(Case T-80/19)

(2019/C 122/31)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Dekoback GmbH (Helmstadt-Bargen, Germany) (represented by: V. von Moers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DecoPac, Inc. (Anoka, Minnesota, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark at issue: EU word mark DECOPAC — EU trade mark No 160 747

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 November 2018 in Case R 1795/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and declare invalid, in its entirety, the trade mark DECOPAC registered for the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and declare invalid, in its entirety, the trade mark DECOPAC registered for the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | No confidentiality of business data; |
| --- | --- |

—

No confidentiality of business data;

| — | Infringement of the right to be heard; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the right to be heard;

| — | No submission of invoices to any significant extent; |
| --- | --- |

—

No submission of invoices to any significant extent;

| — | No use of the trade mark as the other party’s own brand; |
| --- | --- |

—

No use of the trade mark as the other party’s own brand;

| — | Sale also to consumers was planned but did not take place; |
| --- | --- |

—

Sale also to consumers was planned but did not take place;

| — | A distinction between edible and inedible decorations is necessary. |
| --- | --- |

—

A distinction between edible and inedible decorations is necessary.

---
NO. COURT OF APPEALS NO. 03-14-00236-CR
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

KEVIN TODD HARDIN, 

### Appellant/Petitioner

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

### Appellee/Respondent 

### COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS APR 172015 AbelAcosta,Clerk



## FILEDIN 

# Onappeal from theThirdCourt ofAppealspOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEAIS Austin, Texas 

### APR 172015 

## MOTIONTO SUSPEND RULE 9.3(b), AbelAcosta,Clerk

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

### NOW COMES, KEVIN TODD HARDIN, Appellant/Petitioner in the above styled and numbered cause and moves the Court to suspend 

### Rule 9.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In support of this motion Petitioner shows the Court as follows: I. Petitioner is currently incarcerated in the Mark W. Michael Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
- Institutional 

### Division in Tennessee Colony, Texas.II. 

### Rule 9.3(b) states in pertinent part: "A party must file the original and 11 copies of any document addressed to...the Court of 

### Criminal Appeals..." See Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 9.3(b). III. 

### Due to Petitioner's current incarceration, he is unable to duplicate any documents because he does not have access to a copy machine. PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Kevin Todd Hardin respect 

### fully requests that this Court suspend.Rule 9.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in this case and permit him to file only the original of his Petition for Discretionary Review. 

### Respectfully submitted,

espectruiiy submittec
KEVIN TODD HARDIN PETITIONER TDCJ No. 1920319 Mark W. Michael Unit 2664 FM 2054 Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the fore going motion has been served by placing same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to: Burnet County District At 

### torney's Office, P.O. Box 725, Llano, Texas 78643 and State Prose cuting Attorney, P.O. Box 13046, Austin, Texas 78711-3046 on this

KEVIN TODD HARDIN
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valley National Gases
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael L. Tyler, Chief Executive Officer and President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



                                    /s/ Michael L. Tyler
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Michael L. Tyler
                                    Chief Executive Officer and President
                                    November 14, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2303

ELI YECHESKEL; KAREN YECHESKEL,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal From the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-10938)

Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eli Yecheskel, Karen Yecheskel, Appellants Pro Se. William Sears

Estabrook, III, Loretta C. Argrett, Tamara Wenda Ashford, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Stuart L. Brown,

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the tax court’s orders upholding the

determination by Internal Revenue of a deficiency in their 1992

income taxes. We have reviewed the record and the tax court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the tax court. Yecheskel v. Commissioner of

Internal Revenue, No. 95-10938 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 20, 1997; May 29,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 09 -0 00 16 -C V

______________________________ I N THE MATT ER OF TH E MARRI AGE OF WI NFRED MA RBUT A

ND CHARL OTTE MARB UT A N D IN T H E IN T E R E S T O F M
. M
. , A C H ILD

On Appea l from the County Court at L aw Bow ie County , Texas Tr ia l Co ur

t N o. 07 -D -1 53 7- CCL

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Me mor and

um O pin ion

by Chi e f Jus tic e Mo rr issSee T EX . R. A PP . P. 32. 1 2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Charlotte Marbut, a

ppellant, filed he r notice of appea l J anuar

y 20, 2009. M arbut has not filed a docke ting state ment with this C ourt, paid a f iling fe e, or ma de any 1 claim of indig ency . There is nothing in the record to indi cate Marbut has ma de ef forts to have either the cler k' s rec ord or r eporte r' s rec ord filed with this Court, and she has not filed a brief. On Marc h 23, 2009, we c ontacted Ma rb u t b y l et t er, givingher a n opportunity

to cure the var ious defe cts, and wa

rning her that, if we did not rec eive an adequate response within ten day s, this appeal would be subjec t to dism issal for wa nt of prosec ution. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b), (c ). We have r ece ived no communication from Ma rbut. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedur e, we dismiss this a ppeal f or wa nt of prosec ution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b).

J o s hR
. M o r r i s s , III Chief J ustice Date Submitted: April 16, 2009 Date D ecide d: April 17, 2009
Exhibit 10.38



 Exhibit 10.38 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement
(“Amendment”) is made this 9th day of April, 2009 by and between Toby A. Arnheim (“Employee”) and the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (“MTGA”) with its principal place of business at One Mohegan Sun Boulevard,
Uncasville, CT 06382. 
 Whereas, on April 28, 2008, Employee entered into an Employment Agreement with MTGA; and 
 Whereas, the parties wish to amend a certain provision in the Employment Agreement. 
 Now therefore, in consideration of the covenants and the mutual promises of the parties contained herein, the incorporation of the above paragraphs and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which each of the parties hereto acknowledges, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Paragraph 4.1 (d) shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

 “4.1 (d) During the Term of this Agreement. Employee shall receive a car allowance and living allowance of $7,000.00 per month
applying the standard gross up formula. Employee recognizes that this allowance is not considered base pay or used to calculate bonuses or any other benefits that may be granted by MTGA to its employees.” 
  

	 	2.	This Amendment shall be effective April 1, 2009. 

  

	 	3.	This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and each shall be deemed an original and together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


  

	 	4.	This Amendment is intended to supplement and amend the Employment Agreement. To the extent any of the provisions contained in this Amendment conflict with or are
inconsistent with the provisions of the Employment Agreement the provisions of this Amendment shall govern. Except to the extent set forth herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first above written. 
  

									
	Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority	 		 	Toby A. Arnheim
					
	By:	 	 /s/    Jeffrey E. Hartmann
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/    Toby A. Arnheim

	Title:	 	EVP/COO	 		 		 	

  

 -1-
Exhibit 23.0

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Nicholas Financial, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the registration statement (No. 333-143245) on Form S-8 of Nicholas Financial, Inc. of our report dated June 12, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Nicholas Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) which appears in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC
|Atlanta, Georgia     
|June 12, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 21.1


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

OF INVERESK RESEARCH GROUP, INC.


|                                         |  |                         |                 | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --------------- | 
|                                         |  | Jurisdiction of        
|Name                                     |  | Incorporation/Formation
|                                         |  |                        
|CTBR Bio-Research Inc.                   |  |                         | Quebec          | 
|Healthmark Limited                       |  |                         | Scotland        | 
|Inveresk Clinical Research Limited       |  |                         | Scotland        | 
|Inveresk Research Australia Pty Limited  |  |                         | Australia       | 
|Inveresk Research (Canada) Inc.          |  |                         | Canada          | 
|Inveresk Research Czech Republic sro     |  |                         | Czech Republic  | 
|Inveresk Research Deutschland GmbH       |  |                         | Germany         | 
|Inveresk Research Group Limited          |  |                         | Scotland        | 
|Inveresk Research Holdings Limited       |  |                         | England & Wales | 
|Inveresk Research Inc.                   |  |                         | Delaware        | 
|Inveresk Research International Limited  |  |                         | Scotland        | 
|Inveresk Research Israel Limited         |  |                         | Israel          | 
|Inveresk Research Limited                |  |                         | England & Wales | 
|Inveresk Research North Carolina Inc.    |  |                         | North Carolina  | 
|Inveresk Research SARU                   |  |                         | France          | 
|Inveresk Research SL                     |  |                         | Spain           | 
|Inveresk Research Sp z.o.o.              |  |                         | Poland          | 
|Inveresk Research SRL                    |  |                         | Italy           | 
|2645-2151 Quebec Inc.                    |  |                         | Quebec          | 
|PharmaResearch Corporation               |  |                         | Delaware        | 
|Inveresk Research Overseas Limited       |  |                         | Scotland        | 
|Pharma Clinical Research Limited         |  |                         | England & Wales | 
|PharmaResearch Corporation (Pty) Limited |  |                         | Australia       |
ex10a.htm


    


    


    Exhibit
10(a)

    


    


    


    Consent of Ernst
& Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    


    


    We consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm” and to the use of our reports dated (a) March 25, 2009, with
respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New
York and (b) March 20, 2009, with respect to the financial statements
of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-145531) pertaining to
Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by
reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 8.

    


                                          /s/ Ernst & Young
LLP


    


    Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania

    December 17,
2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl Laprade MILLER, III, a.k.a. Boomie, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-12774

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 15, 2009.

Steven E. Butler, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Earl Laprade Miller, III, Estill, SC, pro se.

Before DUBINA, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur j. Madden, III, appointed counsel for Earl Laprade Miller, III, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct and there are no arguable issues of merit. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Miller’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant")
        on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. E. Coffman,
        Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.
 
 */s/
        R. E. Coffman, Jr.*
 
 R.
        E.
        Coffman, Jr.
 President
        & Chief Executive Officer
 
 July
        31,
        2007