36304 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

July 6, 2021, ordered that — 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine: 

(a) Whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain products identified in paragraph 

(2) by reason of infringement of one or 

more of the Asserted Trademarks, and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(b) whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, or in 

the sale of certain products identified in 

paragraph (2), by reason of false 

designation of source or trademark 

dilution, the threat or effect of which is 

to destroy or substantially injure an 

industry in the United States; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘casual footwear with 

holes in the upper and such footwear’s 

packaging’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Crocs, Inc., 

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield, Colorado 

80020. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Cape Robbin Inc., 1943 West Mission 

Blvd., Bldg. F, Pomona, CA 91766 

Bijora, Inc., d/b/a Akira, 200 N Fairfield 

Ave., Chicago, IL 60612 

Dr. Leonard’s Healthcare Corp. d/b/a 

Carol Wright, 100 Nixon Ln., Edison, 

NJ 08837 

Crocsky, 1401 Lavaca St., Austin, TX 

78701 

Fullbeauty Brands Inc. d/b/a Kingsize, 1 

New York Plaza, New York, NY 10004 

Hawkins Footwear, Sports, Military & 

Dixie Store, 6083 New Jesup Hwy., 

Suite J, Brunswick, GA 31523 

Hobibear Shoes and Clothing Ltd., 173 

N 17th Ct., Brighton, CO 80601 

Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 707 SW 44th 

St., Oklahoma City, OK 73179 

Ink Tee, 811 Wilshire Blvd., Los 

Angeles, CA 90017 

La Modish Boutique, 1773 W San 

Bernardino Rd., Suite B25, West 

Covina, CA 91790 

Legend Footwear, Inc., d/b/a Wild Diva, 

19445 E Walnut Drive North, City of 

Industry, CA 91789 

Loeffler Randall Inc., 588 Broadway, 

Ste. 1203, New York, NY 10012 

Maxhouse Rise Ltd., Flat A, 25/F, 

United Centre, 95 Queensway, Hong 

Kong 

PW Shoes, Inc. a/k/a P&W, 5830 Grand 

Ave., 3a, Maspeth, NY 11378 

SG Footwear Meser Grp. Inc. a/k/a S. 

Goldberg & Co., 3 University Plz #400, 

Hackensack, NJ 07601 

Shoe-Nami, Inc., 91 Westbank 

Expressway, Gretna, LA 70053 

Skechers USA, Inc., 228 Manhattan 

Beach Blvd., Manhattan Beach, CA 

90266 

Star Bay Group Inc., 390–400 Railroad 

Ave., Hackensack, NJ 07601 

Yoki Fashion International LLC, 1410 

Broadway, Suite 1005, New York, NY 

10018 

Quanzhou ZhengDe Network Corp., 

d/b/a Amoji, Rm. C–409, No. 2 

YanZhi Gallery, Licheng District, 

Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China 

362002 

718 Closeouts, 1181 Liberty Ave., 

Brooklyn, NY 11208 

Royal Deluxe Accessories, LLC, 165 

Spring St., New Providence, NJ 07974 

Fujian Huayuan Well Import and Export 

Trade Co., Ltd., Rm. 02, Connector of 

Hongyuan Building 1 and 2, No. 246 

Hualin Road, Huada Residential 

District, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 

Fujian Province, China 350001 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: July 6, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14653 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–648 and 731– 

TA–1521–1522 (Final)] 

Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers From 

China and Vietnam 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), 

that an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

of walk-behind lawn mowers from 

China found by the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in 

the United States at less than fair value 

(‘‘LTFV’’) and to be subsidized by the 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices 36305 

government of China, and threatened 

with material injury by reason of 

imports of walk-behind lawn mowers 

from Vietnam found by Commerce to be 

sold at LTFV, provided for in 

subheading 8433.11.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective May 26, 2020, 

following receipt of petitions filed with 

the Commission and Commerce by MTD 

Products, Inc., Valley City, Ohio. The 

final phase of the investigations was 

scheduled by the Commission following 

notification of preliminary 

determinations by Commerce that 

imports of walk-behind lawn mowers 

from China were subsidized within the 

meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and that imports of 

walk-behind lawn mowers from China 

and Vietnam were sold at LTFV within 

the meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the 

scheduling of the final phase of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register on January 29, 2021 (86 FR 

7565). In light of the restrictions on 

access to the Commission building due 

to the COVID–19 pandemic, the 

Commission conducted its hearing 

through video conference on May 18, 

2021. All persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to 

participate. 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to §§ 705(b) 

and 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these investigations on July 6, 2021. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 5209 

(July 2021), entitled Walk-Behind Lawn 

Mowers from China and Vietnam: 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–648 and 

731–TA–1521–1522 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: July 6, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14649 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1545 (Final)] 

Utility Scale Wind Towers From Spain; 

Scheduling of the Final Phase of AntiDumping Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

DATES: June 25, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie 

Duffy ((202) 708–2579), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these investigations may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective 

March 19, 2021, the Commission 

established a general schedule for the 

conduct of the final phase of its 

investigations on utility scale wind 

towers (‘‘wind towers’’) from India, 

Malaysia, and Spain (86 FR 20197, April 

16, 2021), following preliminary 

determinations by the U.S. Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) that 

imports of subject wind towers from 

India and Malaysia were subsidized by 

the governments of India and Malaysia 

(86 FR 15887, March 25, 2021; and 86 

FR 15897, March 25, 2021) and imports 

of subject wind towers from Spain were 

being sold in the United States at less 

than fair value (86 FR 17354, April 2, 

2021). Notice of the scheduling of the 

final phase of the Commission’s 

investigations and of a public hearing 

held in connection therewith was given 

by posting copies of the notice in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on April 

16, 2021 (86 FR 20197). Counsel for the 

Wind Tower Trade Coalition withdrew 

its previously filed request to appear at 

the hearing, after no other parties 

submitted a request to appear, and 

indicated a willingness to submit 

written responses to any Commission 

questions in lieu of an actual hearing. 

Consequently, since no party to the 

investigation requested a hearing, the 

Commission canceled its hearing in 

connection with these investigations (86 

FR 31730). Parties to these 

investigations responded to written 

questions posed by the Commission in 

their posthearing briefs. 

Commerce has issued a final 

affirmative countervailing duty 

determination with respect to wind 

towers from Malaysia (86 FR 30593, 

June 9, 2021). The Commission is 

scheduled to issue its final 

determination as to whether an industry 

in the United States is materially 

injured or threatened with material 

injury, or the establishment of an 

industry in the United States is 

materially retarded, by reason of 

imports of wind towers from Malaysia 

provided for in subheadings 7308.20.00 

and 8502.31.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) that have been found by 

Commerce to be subsidized by the 

government of Malaysia by July 26, 

2021. 

Commerce recently has issued a final 

affirmative antidumping duty 

determination with respect to wind 

towers from Spain (86 FR 33656, June 

25, 2021). Accordingly, the Commission 

currently is issuing a supplemental 

schedule for its antidumping duty 

investigation on imports of wind towers 

from Spain. 

This supplemental schedule is as 

follows: The deadline for filing 

supplemental party comments on 

Commerce’s final antidumping duty 

determination is July 7, 2021. 

Supplemental party comments may 

address only Commerce’s final 

antidumping duty determination 

regarding imports of wind towers from 

Spain. These supplemental final 

comments may not contain new factual 

information and may not exceed five (5) 

pages in length. The supplemental staff 

report in the final phase of this 

investigation regarding subject imports 

from Spain will be placed in the 

nonpublic record on July 19, 2021, and 

a public version will be issued 

thereafter. 

For further information concerning 

these investigations see the 

Commission’s notice cited above and 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B 

(19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). 

Additional written submissions to the 

Commission, including requests 

pursuant to section 201.12 of the 

Commission’s rules, shall not be 

accepted unless good cause is shown for 

accepting such submissions, or unless 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES