alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory J. Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                              ___/s/ Gregory J. Dawson____
                              Chief Financial Officer

                              March 30, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Kentucky
Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



95
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 64 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 64

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in recognition of the long and distinguished service rendered to 
the Nation by Daniel K. Inouye, a Senator from the State of Hawaii and 
formerly a Representative from that State, his remains be permitted to 
lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol on December 20, 2012, and 
the Architect of the Capitol, under the direction of the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, 
shall take all necessary steps for the accomplishment of that purpose.

            Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 
      17), 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 64

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
      state of the remains of the late Honorable Daniel K. Inouye.
```
# C_2019072EN.01004101.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/41

---

Action brought on 2 January 2019 — Hankintatukku Arno Latvus v EUIPO — Triaz Group (VIVANIA)

(Case T-4/19)

(2019/C 72/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hankintatukku Arno Latvus Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Triaz Group GmbH (Freiburg, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark VIVANIA — European Union trade mark No 11 637 121

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 October 2018 in Case R 767/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the request for declaration of invalidity of European Union trade mark No 11 637 121 ‘VIVANIA’; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the request for declaration of invalidity of European Union trade mark No 11 637 121 ‘VIVANIA’;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party before the Board of Appeal to bear the applicant’s costs in the present procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party before the Board of Appeal to bear the applicant’s costs in the present procedure.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael Alberto BERARDI, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-50287.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 2008*

Filed Dec. 29, 2008.

Michael J. Raphael, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Anne Gannon, Esq., USSA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Amy Fan, Saint Martin & Fan, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Michael Alberto Berardi, pro se.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Alberto Berardi appeals from the 97-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*41Berardi contends that the district court erred by applying a five-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(7)(D) because the enhancement disproportionately impacted his sentence, and the government did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that he possessed over 600 images of child pornography. This contention lacks merit. *See United States v. Salcido,*506 F.3d 729, 735 (9th Cir.2007); see also *United States v. Romero-Rendon,*220 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2000).

Berardi also contends that the district court violated Rule 32(i) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure by failing to rule on his objection regarding whether there was sufficient evidence to support the § 2G2.2(b)(7)(D) enhancement. We conclude that the district court did not err because Berardi’s objection was legal, not factual, in nature. *See United States v. Stoterau,*524 F.3d 988, 1012 (9th Cir.2008).

Finally, Berardi contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court treated the Guidelines as mandatory, failed to properly analyze the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and did not sufficiently explain its reasons for imposing a lifetime term of supervised release. We conclude that the district court’s sentencing analysis was reasoned and proper, and that Berardi’s sentence is reasonable. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 994 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc); *see also United States v. Daniels,*541 F.3d 915, 922 (9th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Shropshire, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered April 25,1984, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant did not raise his objections to the adequacy of the plea allocution to the court of first instance and thus failed, as a matter of law, to preserve his claim for appellate review *{see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Willie,*101 AD2d 819). In any event, the record clearly shows that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered his guilty plea.

*883We have reviewed the defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier Mendoza CUEVAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10009.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed July 1, 2011.

John Robert Lopez, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Florence Bruemmer, Law Offices of Florence M. Bruemmer, PC, Anthem, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Mendoza Cuevas appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 144-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to cultivate more than 1000 marijuana plants, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(vii), and (b)(5). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Mendoza Cue-vas’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF BILL MCDERMOTT, CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SAP AG

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SAP AG (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22,
2013 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | 
|Date March 21, 2013 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Bill McDermott |  | 

| |  |  |  |        |  |                            |  | 
| |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------- |  | 
| |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Bill McDermott             |  | 
| |  |  |  | Title: |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
nvdf8k_20091223exh101.htm


     

    
      

      

    

    Exhibit 10.1

    HCIC Extension Agreement

    

      
         

         

      


      HCIC
Holdings, LLC

      c/o John
C. Stroh, II

      701
Walsen

      P.O. Box
1169

      Walsenburg,
CO 81089

      


      December
17, 2009

      


      By
Hand Delivery or Overnight Delivery

      


      To:
Shareholders of the Huerfano-Cucharas Irrigation Company Under Agreement with
HCIC Holdings, LLC

      


      RE:
Extension of Purchase Agreements

      


      Reference
is made to any and all purchase agreements (the “Agreements”) currently in
effect between you and HCIC Holdings, LLC.  As noted in our other
communications, the conditions required for HCIC Holdings, LLC to close pursuant
to such Agreements have not yet been satisfied in full.  As
consideration for the extension provided below, HCIC Holdings, LLC will continue
coordination of and payment for certain engineering and other work associated
with the development of assets of the Huerfano-Cucharas Irrigation
Company.

      


      By your
signature below, please indicate your agreement to the following:

      


      1.  The
Agreements are hereby amended in their entirety to provide for an extension of
the closing date (as defined in the Agreements) to February 1,
2010.

      


      2.  Except
as provided in this Letter Agreement, the Agreements shall remain
unchanged.

      


      This
Letter Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts which, when taken
together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.

      


      Respectfully,

      


      HCIC
HOLDINGS, LLC

      


      


      By:  ________________________                By:    _____________________________

      Fred
Jones                                                             John
McKowen

      Manager                                                                Manager

      


      Acknowledged
and Agreed:

      HUERFANO-CUCHARAS
IRRIGATION COMPANY SHAREHOLDER

      


      


      _____________________________                                                                                     _____________________________

      Name:  _______________________                                                                                     Name:  _______________________

      


      


      _____________________________

      Name:  _______________________
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor
Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Robert Portman, Chief
Executive Officer and President of PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company"), and Stephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2005, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Annual
Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.

DATE: March 29, 2006

By:  /s/ Robert Portman
     ------------------
Robert Portman, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


DATE: March 29, 2006

By: /s/ Stephen P. Kuchen
    ---------------------
Stephen P. Kuchen, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### KENNY v. SYKES.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November Term, 1897.)

Action by Bridget Kenny against Jerome Sykes.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See 47 N. Y. Supp. 1138.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Premier Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack Gregory, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Date:  September 16, 2010 | Jack Gregory
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of Steven Winston, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

April 16, 1986

*265APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Sarah Diane McShea*of counsel *(Michael*A. *Gentile,*attorney), for petitioner.

*Alan L. Hirshman of*counsel *(Karpas & Hirshman & Levine,*attorneys), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to the Bar of the State of New York on February 23, 1972 in the Second Judicial Department. Pursuant to an order of that court dated December 12, 1984, a disciplinary proceeding, in which the major charge was conversion by respondent of a $12,500 escrow deposit, was transferred to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department (DDC).

Respondent contended before the hearing panel that was convened to hear evidence on the charges, that because of his addiction to cocaine, and certain thought dysfunctions resulting both from his addiction and a cocaine abstinence syndrome, he is currently unable to adequately defend himself in the disciplinary proceeding. The DDC and respondent’s counsel cross-move to suspend respondent indefinitely pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.16 (b) and (c), and for his examination by independent psychiatrists.

The motions should be granted, and the hearing before the DDC should be held in abeyance, except as to psychiatric testimony, pending determination by this court of any further motion addressed to respondent’s competence to practice law and to assist in his defense.

Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Carro, Kassal and Wallach, JJ., concur.

Respondent is directed to submit to examinations, and is suspended effective April 16, 1986, and until the further order of this court.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Premier Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack Gregory, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010,, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010,, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Date:  August 13, 2010 | Jack Gregory
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 140 (Monday, July 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40046-40047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15892]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as

[[Page 40047]]

other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 10, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Sebastian Astrada, 
Director, Applications) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. The Vanguard Group, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania; on behalf of 
itself, its subsidiaries and affiliates, including investment companies 
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, other pooled 
investment vehicles, and institutional accounts that are sponsored, 
managed, or advised by Vanguard; to acquire additional voting shares of 
Green Dot Corporation, Pasadena, California, and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of Green Dot Bank, Provo, Utah.
    2. The Vanguard Group, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania; on behalf of 
itself, its subsidiaries and affiliates, including investment companies 
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, other pooled 
investment vehicles, and institutional accounts that are sponsored, 
managed, or advised by Vanguard; to acquire additional voting shares of 
Columbia Banking System, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Columbia Bank, both of Tacoma, Washington.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 21, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-15892 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Case: 1:02-cv-00500 Document #: 31 Filed: 02/06/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:139
Case: 1:02-cv-00500 Document #: 31 Filed: 02/06/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:140
Case: 1:02-cv-00500 Document #: 31 Filed: 02/06/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:141