alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I,
Eric J. Boden, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of HireRight, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: March 10, 2008 |  | By: | /s/ERIC J. BODENEric J. Boden Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00256-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF 

JAMES ROY VAUGHN IV AND AMBER VAUGHN 

AND IN THE INTEREST OF 

J.R.V.V., S.M.E.V., AND C.A.V., CHILDREN

From the 369th District Court

Leon County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV20-0222

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Clerk of this Court notified the parties in a January 12, 2023 letter that the 

appellant’s brief was overdue in this cause and that the appeal may be dismissed if a 

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal was not filed within twenty-one 

days of the date of the letter. No response has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is 

dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant’s “Motion to Strike,” filed on December 27, 2022, is dismissed as moot.
In re Marriage of Vaughn Page 2

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 15, 2023

[CV06]
#### In re BISSING.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

In the matter of the application of William F. Bissing for admission to the bar.

No opinion. Application granted.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 11277 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

BONIFACIO GOROSTIETA

- CASAS

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 267

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Bonifacio Gorostieta

- Casas

raises an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a

sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment.

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

June 21 , 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-11277 Document: 00513557078 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 11277

2 motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-11277 Document: 00513557078 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
##### 



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Plumas Bancorp;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a) - 15(e)
and 15d - 15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent quarter (the registrants
fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: April 19, 2006
 /s/ Douglas N. BiddleDouglas N. Biddle
Chief Executive Officer and President
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22
- 10840 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Amber Dawn Villarreal,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:22
- CR
- 19 - 1

**________________ ______________**  Before **Wiener, Elrod,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Amber Dawn Villarreal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villarreal has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and th e relevant portions of the record reflected

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 20, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10840 Document: 00516719787 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2023No. 22
- 10840

2 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2 . Case: 22-10840 Document: 00516719787 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2023
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                  H. J. HEINZ FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                            Fiscal Years Ended
                                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                April 27, 2005   April 28, 2004   April 30,2003   May 1, 2002   May 2, 2001
(in thousands)                    (52 weeks)       (52 weeks)      (52 weeks)     (52 weeks)    (52 weeks)
--------------                  --------------   --------------   -------------   -----------   -----------
<S>                             <C>              <C>              <C>             <C>           <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense(a).........     $164,568         $139,427        $149,316       $145,966      $ 20,712
  Capitalized interest........           --               --              --             --         1,917
  Interest component of rental
     expense..................        6,322            7,759           6,822          8,869        10,307
                                   --------         --------        --------       --------      --------
     Total fixed charges......     $170,890         $147,186        $156,138       $154,835      $ 32,936
                                   --------         --------        --------       --------      --------
Earnings:
  Income from continuing
     operations before income
     taxes, minority interest
     and cumulative effect of
     accounting changes.......     $352,569         $433,958        $258,290       $462,688      $444,155
  Add: Interest expense(a)....      164,568          139,427         149,316        145,966        20,712
  Add: Interest component of
     rental expense...........        6,322            7,759           6,822          8,869        10,307
  Add: Amortization of
     capitalized interest.....           --               --              --            128           715
                                   --------         --------        --------       --------      --------
     Earnings as adjusted.....     $523,459         $581,144        $414,428       $617,651      $475,889
                                   --------         --------        --------       --------      --------
  Ratio of earnings to fixed
     charges..................         3.06             3.95            2.65           3.99         14.45
                                   ========         ========        ========       ========      ========
</Table>

---------------
(a) Interest expense includes amortization of debt expense and any discount or
    premium relating to indebtedness.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valley National Gases
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert D. Scherich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                /s/ Robert D. Scherich
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Robert D. Scherich
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                November 14, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven P.
Berry, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 27, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of NeoMagic Corporation.

Date: May 30, 2008

By:

/s/ Steven P. BerryName:

Steven P. BerryTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019305EN.01006501.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/65

---

Action brought on 22 July 2019 — Sipcam Oxon v Commission

(Case T-518/19)

(2019/C 305/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sipcam Oxon SpA (Milano, Italy) (represented by: C. Mereu, P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the application admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible and well-founded;

| — | annul the contested Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/677 of 29 April 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/677 of 29 April 2019;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs and expenses of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs and expenses of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted further to manifest errors of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted further to manifest errors of assessment.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation results from a procedure during which the applicant’s rights of defence have not been respected. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation results from a procedure during which the applicant’s rights of defence have not been respected.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted in breach of the principle of legal certainty because of the incorrect application of guidelines. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted in breach of the principle of legal certainty because of the incorrect application of guidelines.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted in breach of the principle of proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted in breach of the principle of proportionality.

| 5. | Fifth plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation wad adopted in breach of the precautionary principle. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Fifth plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation wad adopted in breach of the precautionary principle.

---
#### Village of Babylon, Appellant, v Hendrickson Bros., Inc., Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 809]

In an action to recover damages for continuing public nuisance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated June 6, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleges that, pursuant to a contract with Suffolk County, the defendant completed certain sewer construction work in 1973, and that defects in the construction work constitute and contribute to a continuing public nuisance. The action is time-barred for the reasons stated in the companion case of *Village of Lindenhurst v J.D. Posillico, Inc.*(94 AD3d 1101 [2012] [decided herewith]).

The plaintiffs contentions relating to alleged statutory violations are not properly before this Court. Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15672]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice of a Matter To Be Deferred From the 
Agenda for Consideration at an Agency Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: The previously 
announced meeting agenda of the Board of Directors, published at 86 FR 
37752, has changed.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Tuesday, July 20, 
2021, at 10:00 a.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government 
in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the 
following matter will be deferred from the Summary Agenda at the open 
meeting of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation scheduled to be held at 10:00 a.m. on July 20, 2021, via a 
Webcast live on the internet:
    Memorandum and resolution re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on 
Revisions to Standardized Approach for Calculating the Exposure Amount 
of Derivative Contracts.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Deputy 
Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-8748.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on July 19, 2021.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15672 Filed 7-20-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          5,869
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   17,360
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     14,839
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                38,726
<PP&E>                          20,729
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  59,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           24,948
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        13
<OTHER-SE>                      30,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    59,455
<SALES>                         58,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                60,990
<CGS>                           45,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   45,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                6,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 7,882
<INCOME-TAX>                    1,265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             6,617
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    6,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .52
        


</TABLE>
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT TO




SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AND DEATH BENEFITS AGREEMENT 




     THIS AMENDMENT dated as of the 11th day of December, 2009, by and between EnPro
Industries, Inc., a North Carolina corporation (the “Company”), and William Dries (the
“Executive”);



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, Executive entered into a Supplemental Retirement and Death Benefits Agreement with
the Company dated November 8, 2005 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Executive was scheduled to
receive payments of certain supplemental retirement benefits commencing in 2007 and continuing
annually thereafter until retirement; and



     WHEREAS, Executive and the Company desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein to
eliminate any payments prior to retirement and associated tax gross-up payments for periods
beginning after January 1, 2010;



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein, the
parties agree that the Agreement is amended as follows effective as of the date hereof:




1.
The following sentence is added to the end of Section 1(a) of the
Agreement:


“Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, (i) a Retirement Benefit
Payment shall be determined as of January 1, 2010 and paid as set forth above, (ii)
Retirement Benefit Payments shall not be determined and paid as of any subsequent
January 1 and (iii) a final Retirement Benefit Payment shall be determined as of the
date of Executive’s termination of employment with the Company and paid as set forth
above.”




2.
The following sentence is added to the end of Section 1(c) of the
Agreement:


“Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, (i) a Gross-Up Payment shall
be determined and paid with respect to the Retirement Benefit Payment determined as
of January 1, 2010 as set forth above, and (ii) no Gross-Up Payment shall be made
for any subsequent Retirement Benefit Payment.”



     3. The reference to “related Gross-Up Payment” in section 1(e) of the Agreement is deleted.



     4. Except as expressly or by necessary implication amended hereby, the Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by an officer
thereunder duly authorized so to do, and Executive has accepted and executed this Amendment, all as
of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Robert P. McKinney
 	 
	 	 	Robert P. McKinney 	 
	 	 	Vice President, Human Resources 	 
	 
	 	“Company”

 	 
	 	/s/ William Dries
 	 
	 	William Dries
 	 
	 	“Executive” 	 
	 




2