alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RADNOR
HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,116
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,563
<PP&E>                                         228,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,117
<BONDS>                                        220,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,618
<SALES>                                         93,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,164
<CGS>                                           68,066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                       398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       649
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 9, 2010, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Form 20-F filed on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nikolas P. Tsakos, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Nikolas P. TsakosNikolas P. TsakosPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: October 25, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-81961 and No. 333-81967)
pertaining to the Nicholas Financial, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan and the Nicholas Financial, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan of our report dated May 27, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Nicholas Financial, Inc. and
subsidiaries included in its Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended March 31, 2005, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. (DIXON HUGHES PLLC) Atlanta, Georgia
June 28, 2005
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Med-Emerg International Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      William Danis Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 14, 2005




By:Name:
                    William DanisTitle:
                    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002**

 

This certification is not to be deemed filedpursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does notconstitute a part of the Quarterly Report of UTStarcom, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”).

 

In connection with the Report, we, Hong LiangLu and Michael J. Sophie, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  August 16, 2004

 
| By:    | /s/ Hong Liang Lu                                                   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Hong Liang Lu                                                 |
|   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer                        |
|   |                                                                |
| By:    | /s/ Michael J. Sophie                                               |   |
|   | Name: Michael J. Sophie                                             |
|   | Title: Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 8 71

- C V

Style: Playa Vista LP, Morgan

- Multi Family LLC, and Scott Morgan

v. Lakeside R e , LP, GSRE, Inc., and Avi Ron

Date motion filed * : Janua r y 21 , 201 5

Type of motion: Motion t o Reinstate Case and Extension of Time to File Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 22 , 201 4

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current d ue d ate: N/A

Date Requested: N/A (30 days from date of Order)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: February 26 , 201 5

.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

On December 23, 2014, th is Court granted appellant’s motion to stay in part and abated

the case until after a supplemental clerk’s record containing a final judgment was filed

in this Court. Although the trial clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing a

final judgment on January 6, 2015, a second supplemental clerk’s record containing

an amended notice of hearing was just filed on January 20, 2015, as requested b y

appellees on December 23, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 27.2. Accordingly, appellant’s

motion to reinstate this case and to set appellant’s briefing deadline 30 days from the

date of this Order is granted

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 2

, 38.6(a)( 1 ).

Judge’ s signature: / s/ Laura C. Higley



Date: January 27, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 8

               To strengthen America's national security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Bennet, Mrs. 
Gillibrand, Mr. Coons, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Begich, and Mr. 
Akaka) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                 to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To strengthen America's national security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tough and Smart National Security 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE.

    It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should--
            (1) ensure that members of the Armed Forces, particularly 
        those serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, and veterans get the 
        support they need and deserve;
            (2) work with the President to attack al Qaeda and other 
        terrorist groups with a comprehensive military, intelligence, 
        homeland security, law enforcement, and diplomatic strategy;
            (3) confront the nuclear threat from Iran and North Korea;
            (4) enhance the tools of the United States Government for 
        pursuing key national security interests, including fighting 
        terrorism, preventing failed states, thwarting global 
        pandemics, promoting democracy and development, securing 
        nuclear materials and preventing nuclear proliferation, and 
        combating narco-trafficking and drug-related violence around 
        the world, including along our border with Mexico; and
            (5) reform cybersecurity policy to prevent cyber attacks on 
        the United States Government and critical infrastructure, 
        protect privacy and civil liberties, and implement mechanisms 
        necessary to avert and respond to catastrophic cyber incidents.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                                                  |  |                  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|                                                  | 
|By:                                               |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|                                                 
|Date: March 13, 2009
EXHIBIT 10.9

Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary Sheet



|                                               |  |                         |        | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------ | 
|Annual Retainer                                |  | $                       | 35,000 | 
|                                               | 
|Type of Meeting                                |  | Amount Paid per Meeting |       
|Board Meeting                                  |  | $                       | 3,500  | 
|Special Meeting                                |  | $                       | 3,500  | 
|Telephonic Board Meeting                       |  | $                       | 1,000  | 
|Compensation & Nominating Committee Meeting    |  | $                       | 1,500  | 
|Audit Committee Meeting                        |  | $                       | 3,000  | 
|Executive Committee Meeting                    |  | $                       | 3,500  | 
|Additional Fee for Chairperson (except Audit)  |  | $                       | 1,500  | 
|Additional Fee for Audit Committee Chairperson |  | $                       | 2,000  |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7206

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SEAN ANTHONY ROBINSON, a/k/a Black,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:06-cr-00204-HEH-1)

Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 16, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Anthony Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, 

II, Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sean Anthony Robinson appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motions. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Robinson, No. 3:06-cr-00204-HEH-1 (E.D. 

Va. June 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1397

RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus YNEZ OLSHAUSEN; MARY ELLEN MCDONALD; PETER GORMAN; CHARLO TTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG; STATE OF NC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00130) Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 27, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Weston Johnson, HELMS, MULLISS & WICKER, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Richard Harcourt Fulton, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Thomas J. Ziko, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Randy L. Thomas seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order transferring this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action to a particular district court judge. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Thomas seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 130 (Monday, July 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 36530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14750]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB218]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Bluefish Advisory Panel will hold a public meeting, jointly with the 
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) Bluefish Advisory 
Panel.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 28, 2021, from 2 
p.m. until 4 p.m. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar with a telephone-only 
connection option. Details on the proposed agenda, webinar listen-in 
access, and briefing materials can be accessed on the Council's website 
at: www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
Council's Bluefish Advisory Panel will meet jointly with the Atlantic 
States Marine Fisheries Commission's Bluefish Advisory Panel via 
webinar. The purpose of this meeting is to welcome new Advisory Panel 
members, review recent management track stock assessment information 
for bluefish, and to review the recommendations of the Scientific and 
Statistical Committee (SSC) and Monitoring Committee for 2022-23 catch 
and landings limits.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Kathy Collins at the Council Office, (302) 526-
5253, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: July 7, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-14750 Filed 7-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------


                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Henry P. Herms, the Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Company's  Form 10-Q  Quarterly  Report for the period ended April
          30,  2009 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Henry P. Herms
                                        Henry P. Herms
                                        Vice President - Finance and
June 17, 2009                           Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to**

 

**Section 906of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Hal M. Krisbergh, the Principal ExecutiveOfficer of WorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of WorldGateCommunications, Inc., for the quarterly period ended September 30,2005, which this certification accompanies, fully complies with requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the September 30,2005 Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of WorldGate Communications, Inc.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to WorldGate and will beretained by WorldGate and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: January 23, 2006 |   | /s/  HAL M. KRISBERGH   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                    |   | Hal M.  Krisbergh            |
|                    |   | Principal  Executive Officer |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roque URDIALES GARCIA, Also Known as El Profe, Also Known as Roberto, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-20259

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 29, 2011.

*936Mary Jane Harmon, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roque Urdíales Garcia, Greenville, IL, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Roque Garcia, federal prisoner # 49905-079, appeals the denial of his motion for writ of error *comm nobis*pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). He contends that the district court erred in not making findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to allow this court to review the decision. He also asserts that the court should have vacated the sentences imposed for his three vacated conspiracy convictions because it was without jurisdiction to impose them.

Although the district court did not address its jurisdiction, we must consider it, *sua sponte*if necessary. *See EEOC v. Agro Distribution, LLC,*555 F.3d 462, 467 (5th Cir.2009). Garcia was not entitled to relief through a motion for a writ of error *comm nobis,*because he is still in custody. *See United States v. Esogbue,*357 F.3d 532, 534 (5th Cir.2004). Because he is challenging his federal sentence, the district court should have construed his motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. *See Tolliver v. Dobre,*211 F.3d 876, 877 (5th Cir.2000). That court lacked jurisdiction to do so, however, because Garcia had previously filed a § 2255 mo*937tion, and this court had not authorized the filing of a successive § 2255 motion. *See Hooker v. Sivley,*187 F.3d 680, 681-82 (5th Cir.1999); *United States v. Harris,*388 Fed.Appx. 385, 386 (5th Cir.2010); 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Garcia’s appeal is “from the denial of a meaningless, unauthorized motion.” *See United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994) (per curiam).

Therefore, the judgment is VACATED, and a judgment of dismissal for want of jurisdiction is RENDERED. Garcia’s motion to remand for findings of fact and conclusions of law is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.