Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Proposed Rules 40387 

1 84 FR 63588 (November 18, 2019). 

2 84 FR 67394 (December 10, 2019). 

3The comments are available for public viewing 

at www.regulations.gov by searching Docket No 

SSA–2018–0026. 

in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to 14 CFR part 71 by amending the Class 

E airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface to within a 6.7- 

mile (increased from a 6.6-mile) radius 

of Marana Regional Airport, Marana, 

AZ; adding an extension 3.8 miles each 

side of the 031° bearing from the airport 

extending from the 6.7-mile radius to 

15.3 miles northeast of the airport; 

adding an extension 3.4 miles each side 

of the 330° bearing from the airport 

extending from the 6.7-mile radius to 

12.7 miles northwest of the airport; 

updating the header of the airspace legal 

description to ‘‘Marana, AZ’’ 

(previously ‘‘Marana Regional, AZ’’) to 

coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical 

database; updating the name of the 

airport (previously Marana Regional) to 

coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical 

database; and removing the 

exclusionary language as it is no longer 

required. 

This action is the result of an airspace 

review caused by the decommissioning 

of the Marana NDB which provided 

navigation information for the 

instrument procedures at this airport. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020, 

and effective September 15, 2020, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated July 21, 2020, and 

effective September 15, 2020, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

AWP AZ E5 Marana, AZ [Amended] 

Marana Regional Airport, AZ 

(Lat. 32°24′34′′ N, long. 111°13′06′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile 

radius of the Marana Regional Airport; and 

within 3.8 miles each side of the 031° bearing 

from the airport extending from the 6.7-mile 

radius from the airport to 15.3 miles 

northeast of the airport; and within 3.4 miles 

each side of the 330° from the airport 

extending from the 6.7-mile radius from the 

airport to 12.7 miles northwest of the airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 22, 

2021. 

Martin A. Skinner, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

ATO Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15939 Filed 7–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

20 CFR Parts 404 and 416 

[Docket No. SSA–2018–0026] 

RIN 0960–AI27 

Rules Regarding the Frequency and 

Notice of Continuing Disability 

Reviews; Withdrawal 

AGENCY: Social Security Administration. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. 

SUMMARY: We are withdrawing the 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

(NPRM), Rules Regarding the Frequency 

and Notice of Continuing Disability 

Reviews, published in the Federal 

Register on November 18, 2019. 

DATES: The proposed rule, published at 

84 FR 63588, November 18, 2019, 

identified in this document is 

withdrawn as of July 28, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Office of Regulations and 

Reports Clearance, Social Security 

Administration, 3100 West High Rise 

Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, 

Baltimore, Maryland 21235–6401. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Goldstein, Director, Office of 

Medical Policy, Social Security 

Administration, 6401 Security 

Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, 

(410) 965–1020. For information on 

eligibility or filing for benefits, call our 

national toll-free number, 1–800–772– 

1213, or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit 

our internet site, Social Security Online, 

at http://www.socialsecurity.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 18, 2019, we proposed to 

revise our regulations regarding when 

and how often we conduct continuing 

disability reviews (CDR), which are 

periodic reviews of eligibility required 

for benefit continuation.1 The proposed 

rules would have added a category to 

the existing medical diary categories 

that we use to schedule CDRs, and 

would have revised the criteria for 

assigning each of the medical diary 

categories to cases. The proposed rules 

would also have changed the frequency 

with which we perform a CDR for 

claims involving permanent 

impairments. 

In this proposed rule, we provided a 

60-day comment period, which we 

extended for 15 days, concluding on 

January 31, 2020.2 We received 125,552 

comments during the comment cycle.3


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
40388 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Proposed Rules 

4Our Unified Agenda of Regulatory and 

Deregulatory Actions is available on Reginfo.gov 

and can be accessed at https://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/eAgendaMain. 

The total comment count reflects 

electronic submissions through the 

eRulemaking portals at the Office of the 

Federal Register and Regulations.gov, as 

well as emailed, mailed, and faxed 

comments. We did not make 181 

comments available. These 181 

comments were submitted after the 

comment period closed; included 

personally identifiable information or 

profanity; were unrelated to the 

rulemaking subject matter; or were 

submitted by individuals commenting 

in their capacity as Social Security 

Administration (SSA) employees. 

The Office of Management and Budget 

conducted 11 listening sessions under 

the authority of Executive Order (E.O.) 

12866 during December 2020 and 

January 2021 for interested 

stakeholders, many of whom also 

provided thoughtful and relevant 

comments during the NPRM comment 

period. We appreciate all the 

commenters who provided thoughtful 

feedback on their analysis of, and 

concerns about, the proposed rule. 

Withdrawal of the Proposed Rule 

After considering the submitted 

comments and further feedback 

provided in the listening sessions, we 

are withdrawing the proposed rule, 

Rules Regarding the Frequency and 

Notice of Continuing Disability Reviews 

(84 FR 63588, November 18, 2019) (RIN 

0960–AI27). We noted our intent to 

withdraw the proposed rule in our 

Spring 2021 Unified Agenda of 

Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions.4

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security 

Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security 

Retirement Insurance; 96.004, Social Security 

Survivors Insurance; 96.006, Supplemental 

Security Income). 

List of Subjects 

20 CFR Part 404 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Blind, Disability benefits, 

Old-age, Survivors and Disability 

insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Social security. 

20 CFR Part 416 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Social security, 

Supplemental Security Income (SSI). 

The Acting Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration, Kilolo 

Kijakazi, having reviewed and approved 

this document, is delegating the 

authority to electronically sign this 

document to Faye I. Lipsky, who is the 

primary Federal Register Liaison for 

SSA, for purposes of publication in the 

Federal Register. 

Faye I. Lipsky, 

Federal Register Liaison, Office of Legislation 

and Congressional Affairs, Social Security 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15896 Filed 7–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2021–0332] 

RIN 1625–AA09 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

Indiana Harbor Canal, East Chicago, IN 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

modify the operating schedule that 

governs the Indianapolis Boulevard 

Bridge, mile 2.59, over the Indiana 

Harbor Canal at East Chicago, IN. 

Indiana Department of Transportation, 

the owner and operator of the bridge, 

has requested to stop continual 

drawtender service to the bridge due to 

a lack of openings. We invite your 

comments on this proposed rulemaking. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must reach the Coast Guard on or before 

September 27, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2021–0332 using Federal e-Rulemaking 

Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or email If you have questions 

on this proposed rule, call or email: Mr. 

Lee D. Soule, Bridge Management 

Specialist, Ninth Coast Guard District; 

telephone 216–902–6085, email 

Lee.D.Soule@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

DHS Department of Homeland Security FR 

Federal Register 

IGLD85 International Great Lakes Datum of 

1985 INDOT Indiana Department of 

Transportation 

LWD Low Water Datum based on IGLD85 

OMB Office of Management and Budget 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

(Advance, Supplemental) 

§ Section USACE United States Army Corps 

of Engineers 

U.S.C. United States Code 

USEPA United States Environmental 

Protection Agency 

II. Background, Purpose and Legal 

Basis 

The Indianapolis Boulevard Bridge, 

mile 2.59, over the Indiana Harbor Canal 

is a double leaf bascule bridge that 

provides a horizontal clearance of 68- 

feet and a vertical clearance of 12-feet in 

the closed position with an unlimited 

vertical clearance in the open position. 

The Indianapolis Boulevard Bridge, 

mile 2.59, over the Indiana Harbor Canal 

is required to open on signal and there 

are no previous rulemakings for this 

bridge to discuss. The Indiana Harbor 

Canal is a 3-mile long commercial 

waterway that serves several industries 

near the city of East Chicago, Indiana 

including the largest integrated 

steelmaking facility in North America 

and the 1,400 acre Whiting Refinery that 

includes the former 1889 Standard Oil 

of Indiana refinery at the head of 

navigation. The Indianapolis Boulevard 

Bridge, mile 2.59, over the Indiana 

Harbor Canal is the last drawbridge 

before the head of navigation; once the 

1889 Standard Oil of Indiana refinery 

was torn down the bridge lost its 

purpose for regular openings and the 

waterway silted in around the bridge 

preventing vessels from approaching. 

Approximately thirty years after the 

removal of the refinery the USEPA and 

USACE partnered to remove polluted 

sediments form the waterway and 

established a contaminated dredge 

spoils area above the bridge. The EPA 

and USACE contracted dredging 

company is working a few weeks each 

season and is the only commercial 

vessel requesting the bridge to open. 

There are no records of recreational 

vessels using the Indiana Harbor Canal. 

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The only vessel that has requested an 

opening at the Indianapolis Boulevard 

Bridge, mile 2.59, over the Indiana 

Harbor Canal in thirty years has been 

the dredging contractor, and their work 

schedule is limited to a few weeks a 

year due to migratory wildlife concerns 

in the summer and ice formation in the 

winter. INDOT has agreed that a 

drawtender will be assigned to the 

bridge to accommodate vessel traffic if 

a 12-hour advance notice is provided. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS