alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Jeffrey L. Schwartz, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Traffix, Inc. ("Registration");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: February 28, 2005 |  |     |  |                                                                              
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | By: |  | /s/JEFFREY L. SCHWARTZJEFFREY L. SCHWARTZChairman and Chief Executive Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Traffix, Inc. and will be retained by Traffix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas R.
Young, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 28, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of NeoMagic Corporation.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 7, 2007 |  |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Douglas R. Young   
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Douglas R. Young       
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

THANKSGIVING COFFEE COMPANY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, the undersigned President of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Joan KatzeffPresident March 31, 2008
Unassociated Document


     

    Exhibit
10.3

    
 

    Terms of
Employment Arrangement

    between
Bay National Bank

    and David
E. Borowy

    


    Mr.
Borowy was retained effective November 17, 2008 and is employed on an at-will
basis at a rate of pay of $150,000 as of November 2009.  Mr. Borowy is
also eligible for incentive bonuses at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors, and is entitled to all benefits available
to full time employees of Bay National Bank.

    


    No
discretionary bonuses were paid to Mr. Borowy for the period ended December 31,
2008.
# C_2021088EN.01002802.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Palírna U Zeleného stromu v EUIPO — Bacardi (BLEND 42 VODKA)

(Case T-829/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark BLEND 42 VODKA - Earlier EU word mark and international figurative mark 42 BELOW - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Relevant public - Similarity of the goods and services - Similarity of the signs - Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 88/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. (Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Chleboun, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Bacardi & Co. Ltd (Meyrin, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Parassina, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2019 (Case R 2531/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Bacardi & Co. and Palírna U Zeléného stromu.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.

---
# JJn **tbe Wniteb**  **�tates (!Court**  **of jf**  **eberal ([laitns**  **No. 18-1828T**  **(Filed: May**  **16, 2019)** 

***************************************** ***** **WILLIAM P.**  **JACKSON,**

**Plaintiff,**


### v. **THE UNITED**  **STATES,**

**Defendant.** *****

***** **Tucker Act;**  **Subject Matter**  **Jurisdiction; Tax;**  ***** **Mot ion** **to Dismiss;**  **Tax Refund;**  **Wrongful Levy;**  ***** **Defamation; Intentional**  **Infliction of** **Emotional** ***** **Distress; Fifth**  **Amendment Taking;**  **Due Process;**  ***** **Tort.** ***** ***** ***** ***** *****************************************
**William P.**  **Jackson, Stark**  **City, MO,pro**  **se. Sophia**  **Siddiqui, U.S.**  **Department of**  **Justice, Tax**  **Division, Court**  **of Federal**  **Claims Section,**  **Washington, D.C.,**  **with whom**  **were Richard**  **E. Zuckerman,**  **Principal Deputy**  **Assistant Attorney**  **General, David** **l Pincus,**  **Chief, Court**  **of Federal**  **Claims Section,**  **for Defendant.**  **OPINION AND**  **ORDER DAMI** **CH, Senior**  **Judge. On**  **November 6,**  **2018, Plaintiff,**  **William P.**  **Jackson ("Mr.**  **Jackson"), actingpro**  **se, filed**  **a Complaint**  **with this**  **Court alleging**  **that the**  **United States,**  **or a**  **contractor of** **the United**  **States, placed**  **a "fraudulent**  **Notice of** **Federal Tax**  **Liens" on**  **his property,**  **which caused**  **him to**  **lose a**  **large clie** **nt and**  **caused his**  **business sales**  **to drop.**  **Comp!. at**  **1-2. Mr.**  **Jackson seeks**  **damages of**  **$2,663,312.30. Comp!. at**  **3. On**  **February 28,**  **2019, Defendant,**  **the United**  **States ("the**  **Government"), filed**  **a Motion**  **to Dismiss**  **for lack**  **of subject**  **matter jurisdiction pursuant**  **to Rule**  **12(b )(** **l) of** **the Rules**  **of the**  **United States**  **Court of** **Federal Claims**  **("RCFC"). ECF**  **No. 10.**  **On March**  **26, 2019**  **Mr. Jackson**  **filed his**  **response. ECF**  **No. 11.**  **On April**  **12, 2019,**  **the Government**  **replied. 1**  **ECF No.**  **12.**

**1 On** **May 1,**  **2019, the Court**  **dismissed Plaintiffs**  **complaint pursuant**  **to RCFC**  **Rule 41**  **because Plaintiff** **failed to pay**  **the mandatory**  **filing fee**  **or file**  **an application**  **to proceed**  **in forma**  **pauperis. On**  **May 13,**  **2019, the**  **Court received**  **Plaintiffs filing**  **fee. Therefore,**  **on May**  **16, 2019,**  **the Comt**  **granted Plaintiffs**  **motion to** **reopen the**  **case.**

**7 018 0040 0001** **1393 4311**
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 32 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 32

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 470) an Act to further 
allocate and expand the availability of hydroelectric power generated 
at Hoover Dam, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In the second sentence of section 105(a)(2)(B) of the 
        Hoover Power Plant Act of 1984 (43 U.S.C. 619(a)) (as added by 
        section 2(d)), strike ``General'' and insert ``Conformed 
        General''.
            (2) In section 2(e), strike ``as redesignated as'' and 
        insert ``as redesignated by''.
            (3) In section 2(f), strike ``as redesignated as'' and 
        insert ``as redesignated by''.
            (4) In section 2(g), strike ``as redesignated as'' and 
        insert ``as redesignated by''.

            Passed the Senate October 18, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 32

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    To authorize the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 
technical corrections in the enrollment of H.R. 470, an Act to further 
 allocate and expand the availability of hydroelectric power generated 
                 at Hoover Dam, and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit 32.1



NANOGEN, INC.



CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY

RULE
13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, Howard C. Birndorf,
Chief Executive Officer of Nanogen, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                           
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|November 15, 2004 |  | /s/ HOWARD C.BIRNDORF                     
|                  |  | Howard C. Birndorf Chief Executive Officer
# C_2020061EN.01003602.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Amazon Technologies v EUIPO (ring)

(Case T-270/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark ring - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 61/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Amazon Technologies, Inc. (Seattle, Washington, United States) (represented by: A. Klett and C. Mikyska, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2019 (Case R 2211/2018-5), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark ring

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Amazon Technologies, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Amazon Technologies, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

______________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 17, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 135778(63) Justices 

ROBERT E. BENEFIEL,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 135778 

v COA: 273664 

Livingston CC: 05-021742-NI

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension of the 

time to file his brief is considered and, it appearing the brief was filed October 13, 2008, 

the time for filing is extended to that date. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 17, 2008 

 Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                               NATIONAL CITY BANK
                  NATIONAL CITY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2002-A

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of National City Bank
("National City") as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated
as of March 1, 2002, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the
"Agreement"), between National City, as Seller, Servicer, Administrator and
Custodian, The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee, National City Auto
Receivables Trust 2002-A, as Issuer, and National City Vehicle Receivables Inc.,
as Depositor, does hereby certify as follows:

         1.  Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective
             meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

         2.  National City is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the
             Agreement.

         3.  The undersigned is an officer of National City who is duly
             authorized pursuant the Agreement to execute and deliver this
             Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

         4.  This Certificate relates to the activities of the Servicer for
             January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003 and a review of such
             activities and of the Servicer's performance of its obligations
             under the Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

         5.  Based on such review, to the best knowledge of the undersigned, the
             Servicer has performed in all material respects all its obligations
             under the Agreement through the above period and no default in the
             performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this
Certificate this 30th day of March, 2004

                                              NATIONAL CITY BANK
                                              As Servicer

                                              By: /s/ Richard G. Zab
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Richard G. Zab
                                                  Title: Senior Vice President
#### AMERICAN BRASS & COPPER CO., Respondent, v. BERNZ, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 25, 1907.)

Action by the American Brass & Copper Company against Ótto Bemz. L. O. Van Doren, for appellant. O. Powell, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
#### Weinberg Properties, Respondent, v Murray Kenner et al., Appellants.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce McM. Wright, J.), entered September 19, 1984, which awarded plaintiff the sum of $21,498.85 and dismissed defendants’ first, second, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth counterclaims, and severed and directed an assessment on that portion of plaintiff’s action based on claims for eight months’ rent and other damages for breach of the lease including preparation fees incurred in rerenting the apartment and for legal fees and marshal’s fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen *530Smyk, J.), entered March 22, 1985, awarding plaintiff the sum of $47,336.26, including interest and costs, unanimously modified to reduce the award of counsel fees and disbursements included therein to $3,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In our view Special Term properly granted plaintiff summary judgment for unpaid rent and $100 per month liquidated damages for late payments of such rent as provided in the lease for the period July through December 1982, during which time defendants occupied the apartment, together with the cost of repairs to the apartment, and directed an assessment for the period the apartment remained unoccupied during the balance of the lease, together with other expenses including counsel fees.

However, we have concluded that counsel fees granted upon the assessment were excessive, and should not have exceeded the sum of $3,000,, including disbursements. Accordingly, we direct that the judgment entered March 22, 1985 be modified to reflect that reduction in counsel fees and otherwise affirmed. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Fein, Milonas, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.
# C_2019072EN.01004502.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/45

---

Action brought on 10 January 2019 — Activos e Inversiones Monterroso v SRB

(Case T-16/19)

(2019/C 72/58)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Activos e Inversiones Monterroso, SL (Pantoja, Spain) (represented by: S. Rodríguez Bajón, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

Take note of the present action for annulment of the decision adopted by the Single Resolution Board of 31 October 2018, in the framework of this procedure [Ares (2017) 61995390] and, the appropriate legal steps having been taken, give judgment annulling the decision of 31 October 2018 and upholding the form of order sought, granting access to all documents included in the relevant administrative file.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. (1)

| — | In that connection, the applicant argues that, in the present case, protection of the public interest as regards the economic or monetary policy of the European Union or a Member State, protection of the commercial interests of a natural or legal person, protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual, protection of the purpose of investigations, or the opposition of the originator of the information, are not applicable as exceptions to the disclosure of documents. |
| --- | --- |

—

In that connection, the applicant argues that, in the present case, protection of the public interest as regards the economic or monetary policy of the European Union or a Member State, protection of the commercial interests of a natural or legal person, protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual, protection of the purpose of investigations, or the opposition of the originator of the information, are not applicable as exceptions to the disclosure of documents.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         441
<SECURITIES>                                   14,836
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,015
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               34,449
<PP&E>                                         10,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,398
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       101
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,827
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               45,517
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  25,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (698)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (864)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (315)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (549)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (549)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)



</TABLE>