alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 20

- 00027

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 30th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. 179,616

- A

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### E DDIE 

### W AGNER 

### M ARTIN 

### , J R



### . , Appellant

V



### .
A LLEN 

### P OWELL AND 

### J OSE 

### V ILLACORTA 

### , Appellees2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On April 14, 2020, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the
appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated th at we could dismiss
the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days, appellant filed with the

court a n appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. A pp. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response. Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8( a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : A ugust 2 0, 2020
# C_2020114EN.01000701.xml

| 6.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/7

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2020 — Bog-Fran v EUIPO — Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ (Furniture)

(Case T-159/19) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an item of furniture - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Disclosure of the earlier design - Proof of disclosure - Article 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

(2020/C 114/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bog-Fran sp. z o.o. sp.k. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Mikosza, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ S.A. (Ostrów Mazowiecka, Poland) (represented by: H. Basiński, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 January 2019 (Case R 291/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Bog-Fran and Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 January 2019 (Case R 291/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Bog-Fran sp. z o.o. sp.k. and Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ S.A.; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 January 2019 (Case R 291/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Bog-Fran sp. z o.o. sp.k. and Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ S.A.;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Bog-Fran; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Bog-Fran;

| 4. | Orders Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Periodic Report

Pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned
officer of Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that,
to the undersigneds knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the
 Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (2) | the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                       

|       |             |  |                                                       
|------ | ----------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: | May 7, 2009 |  |                                                       
|       |             |  |                                                       
|       |             |  | /s/ Mary T.
 Minch                                    
|       |             |  | Name: Mary
 T. Minch                                  
|       |             |  | Title:
 Senior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial
|       |             |  | Officer and
 Secretary                                
|       |             |  |                                                       

THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

---
S. Con. Res. 63 Agreed to December 19, 2012

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That the Secretary of the Senate is requested to return 

to the House of Representatives the enrolled bill (S. 2367, an 

Act to strike the word ‘‘lunatic’’ from Federal law, and for other 

purposes). Upon the return of such bill, the action of the Speaker 

of the House of Representatives in signing it shall be rescinded. 

The Secretary of the Senate shall reenroll the bill with the following 

correction: In section 2(b)(1)(B), strike ‘‘in subsection (b)’’ and insert 

‘‘in subsection (j)’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00138-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Appellant

v.

MEGHAN K. WELLS,

Appellee

From the 21st District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 25,844

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a “joint motion for entry of an agreed order” that is signed 

by counsel for each party. It states that they agree that we should reverse the trial 

court’s order being appealed, should affirm the underlying administrative decision, and 

should order that each party bear their own costs as incurred. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a)(2)(A).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s January 8, 2010 order and render 

judgment affirming the October 13, 2009 administrative decision that suspends 
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Wells Page 2

Appellee Meghan K. Wells’s license for 90 days. It is further ordered that each party 

pay costs of this appeal as they have been incurred.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and 

Justice Davis

Motion granted; judgment reversed and rendered

Opinion delivered and filed October 27, 2010

[CV06]
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Periodic Report**     Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officerof Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the undersigned’sknowledge: (1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 5, 2006            /s/ Terrance D. Paul         Name: Terrance D. Paul    Title: Chief Executive Officer  THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
# C_2020061EN.01004602.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/46

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — FF v Commission

(Case T-654/19 R)

(Interim relief - Law governing the institutions - Liability of the European Union - Photograph of a man used as a health warning - Action for damages - Application for interim measures - Necessity - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 61/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: FF (represented by: A. Fittante, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for an order that an expert’s report be obtained as an interim measure.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is refused. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is refused.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Weston Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Yi Sen Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.   the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: April 19, 2004


/s/ Yi Sen Wong
------------------------
Yi Sen Wong
Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021502EN.01002001.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Novolipetsk Steel v Commission

(Case T-790/19) (1)

(Measures that the European Union may take in relation to the combined effect of anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures with safeguard measures - Importation of cold-rolled flat steel products and hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel - Modification of regulations imposing anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures on products subject to safeguard measures - Principle of non-discrimination - Manifest error of assessment)

(2021/C 502/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Novolipetsk Steel PAO (Lipetsk, Russia) (represented by: E. Gergondet and P. Vander Schueren, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1382 of 2 September 2019 amending certain Regulations imposing anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures on certain steel products subject to safeguard measures (OJ 2019 L 227, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Novolipetsk Steel PAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Novolipetsk Steel PAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.

---
CEO Achievement Award



 EXHIBIT 10.6 
 RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby approves the payment of a special incentive award in the amount of $1,946,000 to Dan Ustian.
II 

Calendar No. 149 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 714 

[Report No. 112–69] 

To reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2011 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. UDALL

of New Mexico, and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, with an amendment 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Land Trans5 action Facilitation Act Reauthorization of 2011’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 714 RS

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL LAND TRANSACTION FACILITATION ACT. 

2 The Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in section 203(2) (43 U.S.C. 2302(2)), by 

5 striking ‘‘on the date of enactment of this Act was’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘is’’; 

7 (2) in section 205 (43 U.S.C. 2304)— 

8 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘this 

9 Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the Federal Land Trans10 action Facilitation Act Reauthorization of 2009 

11 2011’’; and 

12 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘11’’ and 

13 inserting ‘‘21’’; 

14 (3) in section 206 (43 U.S.C. 2305), by striking 

15 subsection (f); and 

16 (4) in section 207(b) (43 U.S.C. 2306(b))— 

17 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

18 (i) by striking ‘‘96–568’’ and insert19 ing ‘‘96–586’’; and 

20 (ii) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and inserting a 

21 semicolon; 

22 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

23 (i) by inserting ‘‘Public Law 105– 

24 263;’’ before ‘‘112 Stat.’’; and 

25 (ii) by striking the period at the end 

26 and inserting a semicolon; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 714 RS

1 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(3) the White Pine County Conservation, 

3 Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 (Public 

4 Law 109–432; 120 Stat. 3028); 

5 ‘‘(4) the Lincoln County Conservation, Recre6 ation, and Development Act of 2004 (Public Law 

7 108–424; 118 Stat. 2403); 

8 ‘‘(5) subtitle F of title I of the Omnibus Public 

9 Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 1132 

10 note; Public Law 111–11); 

11 ‘‘(6) subtitle O of title I of the Omnibus Public 

12 Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 460www 

13 note, 1132 note; Public Law 111–11); 

14 ‘‘(7) section 2601 of the Omnibus Public Land 

15 Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 

16 Stat. 1108); or 

17 ‘‘(8) section 2606 of the Omnibus Public Land 

18 Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 

19 Stat. 1121).’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 149 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 714 

[Report No. 112–69] 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction 

Facilitation Act, and for other purposes. 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 

Reported with an amendment 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,124
<SECURITIES>                                   107,876
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (14,124)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,002
<PP&E>                                          14,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,496
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,915
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,395
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Thomas N. Adams, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant,
certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Texas
United Bancshares, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 30, 2005



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Thomas N. Adams                              
|Thomas N. Adams                                     
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020175EN.01002602.xml

| 25.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/26

---

Order of the General Court of 25 March 2020 — Lucaccioni v Commission

(Case T-507/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Preparatory act - Action for compensation - Action closely related to the action for annulment - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 175/35)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Arnaldo Lucaccioni (San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy) (represented by: E. Bonanni, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking (i) annulment of the decision of the Commission of 13 September 2018 rejecting the application for the recusal of doctor A, a medical practitioner appointed by the Commission to a medical committee established in the context of a request on the part of the applicant seeking recognition of the aggravation of an occupational disease and (ii) compensation for the harm that the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Arnaldo Lucaccioni is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Arnaldo Lucaccioni is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Company                                                                State of Incorporation

<S>                                                                  <C>
Denticator International, Inc .................................        Missouri
Young Dental Manufacturing I, LLC..............................        Missouri
         Young Dental International, Inc ......................        Barbados
         Lorvic Holdings, Inc. ................................        Delaware
                  The Lorvic Corporation ......................        Delaware
         YI Europe, Limited ...................................        England
Young Acquisitions Company ....................................        Missouri
         Panoramic Rental Corp ................................        Missouri
YI Europe, Limited. ...........................................        England
Athena Technology, LLC.........................................        Missouri
</TABLE>