alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 32.1




                                  CERTIFICATION
                                     OF THE
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valley National Gases
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, William A. Indelicato, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                /s/ William A. Indelicato
                                                -----------------------------
                                                William A. Indelicato
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                February 18, 2005



                                     - 36 -
Exhibit
        23
 
 CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We
        have
        issued our reports dated March 15, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial
        statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
        in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. for the year
        ended
        December  31, 2006.  We hereby consent to the incorporation
        by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Oak Hill
        Financial, Inc. on Forms S-8, File Nos. 333-116863, 333-45690, 333-81167
        and
        333-27481.
 
 
 */s/
        Grant Thornton LLP*
 
 
 Cincinnati,
        Ohio
 March
        15,
        2007
EX-10.1








State of Tennessee

Department of Finance and Administration

Bureau of TennCare

310 Great Circle Road




Nashville, Tennessee 37243




	 	 	 
	Phil Bredesen

Governor

	 	M. D. Goetz, Jr.

Commissioner






December 22, 2009



Mr. Ken Edwards, CFO


AmeriGroup Community Care 22
Century Blvd., Suite 30
Nashville, Tennessee 37214



Dear Mr. Edwards:



Pursuant to Section 3.4.2 of the CRA, this letter-serves as notification of rates
effective July 1, 2009 through June 30. 2011, The CRA outlines that you have 30 days to accept or
reject the rates. Should you refuse to continue this Agreement under the new rates, you may
activate the termination provisions contained in Section 4.4.7 of the CRA.



These rates are retroactive to July 1, 2009. It is the Bureau’s intent, pending systems
changes, to pay the differential between the interim rate and the final rates in the February 2010
capitation cycle.



A databook from the Bureau’s actuarial firm is attached.
Sincerely,







Scott C. Pierce



Chief Financial Officer



Attachment



cc: • Casey Dungan. Asst. CFO
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, (chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of CuraGen Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |    
|Dated: August 9, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Frank M. Armstrong, M.D.                                   
|                      |  |     |  | Frank M. Armstrong, M.D.                                       
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President                          
|                      |  |     |  | (principal executive officer of the registrant)                
|                      |  |    
|Dated: August 9, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ David M. Wurzer                                            
|                      |  |     |  | David M. Wurzer                                                
|                      |  |     |  | Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                      |  |     |  | (principal financial and accounting officer of the registrant)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jimmy Peterson, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered June 13, 1983, affirmed. *(People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9.) Titone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
# C_2022237EN.01004501.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) and Others v Commission

(Case T-508/19) (1)

(State aid - Aid scheme implemented by the Government of Gibraltar concerning corporation tax - Tax exemption for interest income and royalties - Advance tax rulings benefiting multinationals - Commission decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Selective advantage - Right to submit comments)

(2022/C 237/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Singapore, Singapore), MJN Global Holdings BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands), Mead Johnson BV (Nijmegen, Netherlands), Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. (Chicago, Illinois, United States) (represented by: C. Quigley, Barrister, M. Whitehouse and P. Halford, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/700 of 19 December 2018 on the State Aid SA.34914 (2013/C) implemented by the United Kingdom as regards the Gibraltar Corporate Income Tax Regime (OJ 2019 L 119, p. 151).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2019/700 of 19 December 2018 on the State Aid SA.34914 (2013/C) implemented by the United Kingdom as regards the Gibraltar Corporate Income Tax Regime so far as it states, in Article 2, that the individual aid granted by the Government of Gibraltar on the basis of the continuation, after 31 December 2013, of the advance tax ruling granted to MJN Holdings (Gibraltar) Ltd is unlawful and incompatible with the internal market and in so far as it orders, in Article 5(1) and (2), the recovery of that aid; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2019/700 of 19 December 2018 on the State Aid SA.34914 (2013/C) implemented by the United Kingdom as regards the Gibraltar Corporate Income Tax Regime so far as it states, in Article 2, that the individual aid granted by the Government of Gibraltar on the basis of the continuation, after 31 December 2013, of the advance tax ruling granted to MJN Holdings (Gibraltar) Ltd is unlawful and incompatible with the internal market and in so far as it orders, in Article 5(1) and (2), the recovery of that aid;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd, MJN Global Holdings BV, Mead Johnson BV, Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. and the Commission to each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd, MJN Global Holdings BV, Mead Johnson BV, Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. and the Commission to each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.

---
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00071

- CR

W ILLIAM A. S ARRINGAR AKA C OREY

D. R EYNOLDS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 371st District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 0807182D )

July 7, 2022

Per Curiam Me morandum Opinion

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER C URIAM
Exhibit 31.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

     I, Patrick C. Barry, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bluefly, Inc;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  May 11, 2006                                  /s/ Patrick C. Barry
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Patrick C. Barry
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019295EN.01006102.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/61

---

Action brought on 1 July 2019 — La Russa v Parliament

(Case T-441/19)

(2019/C 295/80)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Romano Maria La Russa (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;

| — | order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.

---
Law Office of Beth Watkins 926 Chulie Drive San Antonio, Texas 78216 210.225.6666- PHONE 210.225.2300-Fax www.WatkinsAppeals.com

Mr. Christopher A. Prine Clerk ofthe Court Fourteenth Court ofAppeals 301 Fannin Street, Room 245 Houston, Texas 77002 July 24,2015 Beth WATKiNSt Beth.Watkins@Watkinsappeals.com Shannon K. Dunn Shannon.Dunn@Watkinsappeals.com
FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS 

## JUL 27 2015 CHRIS lUKMfcfi A. PHINE CLERK


### re: Cause No. 14-15-00517-DV, Rotenco, S.A. De C V. v. OscarPulido Individually and 

### d/b/a International Industrial Suppliers Co., Surtind, Inc. andSurtind Imp. &Exp., S.A. De C. V.
Dear Mr. Prine: 

### My office represents Appellant Rotenco, S.A. De C.V. in the above entitled and numbered cause. I ask that you please prepare a CD containing a copy ofthe appellate record inthis cause and send it to me via first-class mail in the enclosed self-addressed, pre-paid CD mailer. 

### Please do not hesitate to contact me if1can be ofany further assistance.

encl.

t Board Certified- CivilAppellateLaw,Texas Board ofLegal Specialization Sincerely,

Shannon K. Dunn
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24

- 6267

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
YUESEYUAN CRUEL , Defendant

- Appellant

.

No. 24

- 6268

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
YUESEYUAN CRUEL , Defendant

- Appellant.

No. 24

- 6269

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee , USCA4 Appeal: 24-6269 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 v.
YUESEYUAN CRUEL , Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 6:99

- cr - 00625

- HMH

- 3; 6:02

- cr - 00858

- HMH

- 1; 6:08

- cr - 00797

- JMC

- 1 )

Submitted : May 21, 2024 Decided: May 24, 2024

Before WYNN and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Yueseyuan Cruel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6269 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Yueseyuan Cruel appeals the district court’s text orders denying his motions for
destruction of records and a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-6269 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/24/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
**Exhibit** **32**




**CERTIFICATION
      UNDER SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
      certifies in his capacity as an officer of ITLA Capital Corporation (the
“Company”) that this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
      ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
      (a)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
      contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
      and
      for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such
      report.




Date: March 16, 2006
              /s/ George W.
                HaligowskiGeorge W. HaligowskiChairman of the Board,President and Chief Executive
                Officer




Date: March 16, 2006
            /s/ Timothy M. DoyleTimothy M. DoyleExecutive Managing Director
              andChief Financial
              Officer




This
      certification accompanies this periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2019213EN.01003901.xml

| 24.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/39

---

Action brought on 20 February 2019 — Pavel v EUIPO — bugatti (B)

(Case T-114/19)

(2019/C 213/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dan-Gabriel Pavel (Oradea, Romania) (represented by: E. Nedelcu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: bugatti GmbH (Herford, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark B — European Union trade mark No 13 545 181

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 December 2018 in related Cases R 49/2018-1 and R 85/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and maintain the trade mark EUTM-013545181 validly registered as it was registered on 05/05/2016 for all the goods and services; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and maintain the trade mark EUTM-013545181 validly registered as it was registered on 05/05/2016 for all the goods and services;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the judicial costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the judicial costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Inapplicability of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Inapplicability of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Absence of proof concerning the breach of the public interest. |
| --- | --- |

—

Absence of proof concerning the breach of the public interest.

---
##### 



Exhibit 14.4 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS To the Board of Directors of
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (CVRD) We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration
Statement on Form F-4 (File Nos. 333-109610; 333-109610-01) of CVRD and Vale
Overseas Limited (Vale Overseas); and (ii) the Registration Statement on Form
F-3 (File Nos. 333-110867; 333-10867-01) of CVRD and Vale Overseas of our
report dated January 21, 2004 on the financial statements of ALUNORTE  Alumina
do Norte do Brasil S.A. which appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of CVRD
and Vale Overseas for the year ended December 31, 2003. June 4, 2004 /s/ Trevisan Auditores Independentes
 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of October 31, 2004, and for the period then ended.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Neil D. Wilkin, Jr.              
|Neil D. Wilkin, Jr.                  
|Chairman of the Board of Directors,  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|January 26, 2005
# C_2021422EN.01003801.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/38

---

Order of the General Court of 26 August 2021 — Imagina Media Audiovisual and Others v Commission

(Case T-268/19) (1)

(2021/C 422/50)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
# C_2020433EN.01004502.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Decathlon v EUIPO — Athlon Custom Sportswear (athlon custom sportswear)

(Case T-349/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark athlon custom sportswear - Earlier EU word mark DECATHLON - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 433/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Decathlon (Villeneuve-d’Ascq, France) (represented by: A. Cléry and C. Devernay, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Athlon Custom Sportswear PC (Kallithea, Greece)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2019 (Case R 1724/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Decathlon and Athlon Custom Sportswear.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Decathlon to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Decathlon to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.

---