alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, John R. Hickey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Renaissance Learning, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: May 5, 2004
      -----------

                                          /s/ John R. Hickey
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          John R. Hickey
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
(55 Misc. Rep. 93.)

#### NATIONAL PARK BANK v. SAITTA.

(Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County.

June, 1907.)

Evidence—Parol Evidence—Bills and Notes—Action on Draft.

A draft, drawn on defendant and accompanied by a bill of lading, was discounted by plaintiff, and the proceeds paid by check to the order of the drawer of the draft, which was accepted by defendant in Italy. *Held,*in an action on the draft, that defendant could show that it was agreed between plaintiff and himself that the bill of lading should be delivered to him when he accepted the draft.

[Ed. Note.—Por cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 20, Evidence, §§ 1800, 1925.]

Action by the National Park Bank against Phillips S. Saitta. Verdict for plaintiff. Motion for reargument of motion for new trial. Motion granted.

Louis P. Doyle, for plaintiff.

C. L- Thieel, for defendant.

BLANCHARD, J.

This is a motion for a reargument by the defendant of his motion for a new trial, which was made and' denied at the time of the trial. The defendant applied to the plaintiff, with a draft drawn on himself and accompanied by a bill of lading, and asked that the draft be discounted and the proceeds paid in the form of a check to the order of one Mauro, the drawer of the draft. This was done. Subsequently the defendant went to Genoa, Italy, and there, as appears from the evidence, accepted the draft. Upon the trial the defendant offered evidence tending to show that there was an agreement between the plaintiff and himself that the bill of lading should be delivered to the defendant when he accepted the draft. This evidence was excluded, against the objection and exception of the defend^ ant, upon the theory that it was inadmissible as parol evidence tending to vary a written instrument. Further consideration impels the court to the view that the evidence offered falls within the exception to the rule above mentioned, permitting the original parties to introduce parol evidence of a default in the condition precedent to the taking effect of the instrument, when such default consists in a failure of consideration. Higgins v. Ridgway, 153 N. Y. 130, 47 N. E. 32; Daniel Neg. Inst. (5th Ed.) § 81a. Upon this principle the court is-*329of opinion, after mature reflection, that the evidence which the defendant sought to adduce as aforesaid should have been admitted.

The motion for a reargument is therefore granted, and the motion for a new trial is granted upon the grounds already indicated.

Motion granted.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, George E. Daddis Jr., the Principal
Executive Officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of WorldGate
Communications, Inc., for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, which
this certification accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of WorldGate Communications, Inc.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WorldGate and will be
retained by WorldGate and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





Dated:  November
      16, 2009
                
                /s/  George
      E. Daddis Jr.George
      E. Daddis Jr.Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3561-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-3561-EM), dated July 4, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 7, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of July 4, 2021.

Alachua, Columbia, Dixie, Franklin, Hamilton, Gilchrist, Jefferson, Lake, Lafayette, Madison, Marion, Sumter, Suwannee, Taylor, and Wakulla Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B), limited to direct Federal assistance and reimbursement for mass care including evacuation and shelter support.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2021-15619 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
# C_2020271EN.01003701.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Brands Up v EUIPO (Credit24)

(Case T-651/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark Credit24 - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 271/47)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Brands UP OÜ (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: M. Welin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 July 2019 (Case R 465/2019-2), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign Credit24 as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Brands UP OÜ to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Brands UP OÜ to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.

---
# C_2021338EN.01002201.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/22

---

Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 2 July 2021 — Bourel and Others v Commission

(Case T-777/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Construction of wind farms - Individual aid measures granted by France to several marine wind farms - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Start of work - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 338/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: David Bourel (Pléneuf-Val-André, France) and five other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Le Berre, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and A. Bouchagiar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, inter alia, suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 5498 final of 26 July 2019 by which the Commission decided not to raise objections to aid granted to several marine wind farms which was notified by the French Republic.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs shall be reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs shall be reserved.

---
Exhibit 13a
  
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of LiveReel Media Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
 
 
 Date:  October 22, 2014
 
 
 /s/ Michael Wekerle
 Michael Wekerle
 Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 
 Exhibit 13a
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of LiveReel Media Corporation. for the year ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
 
 
 Date:  October 22, 2014
 
 
 /s/ Henry Kneis
 Henry Kneis
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR VALLEY NATIONAL GASES INCORPORATED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001030715
<NAME> VALLEY NATIONAL GASES INCORPORATED

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         645,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,532,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                   586,698
<INVENTORY>                                 14,790,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,155,843
<PP&E>                                      89,386,931
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,017,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             134,930,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,055,491
<BONDS>                                     71,285,344
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,620
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,226,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               134,930,588
<SALES>                                     31,357,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,357,279
<CGS>                                       14,749,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,749,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,977,098
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,287,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,440,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                   627,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            813,186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   813,186
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
# C_2023015EN.01003501.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Cambodia and CRF v Commission

(Case T-246/19) (1)

(Safeguard measures - Rice market - Imports of Indica rice originating in Cambodia and Myanmar/Burma - Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 - Concept of ‘Union producers’ - Concept of ‘like or directly competing products’ - Serious difficulties - Rights of the defence - Essential facts and considerations - Manifest errors of assessment)

(2023/C 15/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Kingdom of Cambodia, Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF) (Phnom Penh, Cambodia) (represented by R. Antonini, E. Monard and B. Maniatis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by A. Biolan, H. Leupold and E. Schmidt, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Ente Nazionale Risi (Milan, Italy) (represented by F. Di Gianni and A. Scalini, lawyers), Italian Republic (represented by G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/67 of 16 January 2019 imposing safeguard measures with regard to imports of Indica rice originating in Cambodia and Myanmar/Burma (OJ 2019 L 15, p. 5), by which the European Commission reintroduced the Common Customs Tariff duties on imports of that rice for a period of three years and introduced a progressive reduction in the rate of duty applicable.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/67 of 16 January 2019 imposing safeguard measures with regard to imports of Indica rice originating in Cambodia and Myanmar/Burma; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/67 of 16 January 2019 imposing safeguard measures with regard to imports of Indica rice originating in Cambodia and Myanmar/Burma;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Kingdom of Cambodia and by Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Kingdom of Cambodia and by Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF);

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic and Ente Nazionale Risi to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic and Ente Nazionale Risi to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
# C_2020209EN.01002402.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2020 — Bergslagernas Järnvaru v EUIPO — Scheppach Fabrikation von Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen (Wood-splitting tool)

(Case T-73/19) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a wood-splitting tool - Earlier national design - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - No different overall impression - Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Infringement of the rights of the defence - Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002)

(2020/C 209/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag (Saltsjö-Boo, Sweden) (represented by: S. Kirschstein-Freund and B. Breitinger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Scheppach Fabrikation von Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen GmbH (Ichenhausen, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 November 2018 (Case R 1455/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Scheppach Fabrikation von Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen and Bergslagernas Järnvaru.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Synovics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended January 31,
2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ronald
Howard Lane, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the
         Company for the periods presented.

Dated: March 21, 2008

By:   /s/ RONALD H. LANE
      ------------------
      Ronald Howard Lane
      Chief Executive Officer



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Synovics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Synovics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# C_2020103EN.01000803.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/8

---

Appeal brought on 11 November 2019 by ruwido austria GmbH against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 11 September 2019 in Case T-649/18 ruwido austria GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-823/19 P)

(2020/C 103/12)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: ruwido austria GmbH (represented by: A. Ginzburg, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 13 February 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed and ordered the appellant to pay its own costs.

---