alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 29 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE UNITED STATES 

4 CAPITOL TO PRESENT THE CONGRESSIONAL 

5 GOLD MEDAL. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The rotunda of the United 

7 States Capitol is authorized to be used on November 16, 

8 2011 for the presentation of the Congressional Gold 

9 Medal, collectively, to Neil A. Armstrong, Edwin E. 

10 ‘‘Buzz’’ Aldrin, Jr., Michael Collins, and John Herschel 

11 Glenn, Jr., in recognition of their significant contributions 

12 to society. 

13 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

14 conduct of the event described in subsection (a) shall be 
2 

†SCON 29 ES 

1 carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 

2 prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the Senate September 23, 2011. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 29 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the United 

society. recognition of their significant contributions to chael Collins, and John Herschel Glenn, Jr., in Armstrong, Edwin E. ‘‘Buzz’’ Aldrin, Jr., Migressional Gold Medal, collectively, to Neil A. States Capitol for an event to present the Con-
# C_2021028EN.01004301.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Kisscolor Living v EUIPO — Teoxane (KISS COLOR)

(Case T-802/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark KISS COLOR - Earlier EU word mark KISS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Temporal application of the law)

(2021/C 28/65)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Kisscolor Living GmbH (Bad Homburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Büttner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Teoxane SA (Geneva, Switzerland)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 September 2019 (Case R 2167/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Teoxane and Kisscolor Living.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Kisscolor Living GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kisscolor Living GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

         (1)    the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


Dated: November 5, 2004
       ----------------

                                              /s/ Steven A. Schmidt
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:  Steven A. Schmidt
                                              Title: Executive Vice President
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer



THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY
FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 958 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 958

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program of 
    payments to children's hospitals that operate graduate medical 
                          education programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2011

Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
  Kerry, Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. Roberts) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program of 
    payments to children's hospitals that operate graduate medical 
                          education programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Children's Hospital GME Support 
Reauthorization Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS THAT OPERATE 
              GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 340E of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256e) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``2011'' and inserting 
        ``2016'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(3)(D)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``Report'' and 
                inserting ``Reports''; and
                    (B) in the matter preceding clause (i), by 
                inserting ``and not later than the end of fiscal year 
                2015,'' after ``2011,''; and
            (3) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(A)(iv), by striking ``2011'' 
                and inserting ``2016''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(D), by striking ``2011'' and 
                inserting ``2016''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 124 (Thursday, July 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35075-35076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System


Early Engagement Opportunity: Implementation of National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD announces an early engagement opportunity regarding 
implementation of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2021 within the acquisition regulations.

DATES: Early inputs should be submitted in writing via the Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System (DARS) website shown below. The website 
will be updated when early inputs will no longer be accepted.

ADDRESSES: Submit early inputs via the DARS website at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/early_engagement.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Johnson, Tel: 703-717-8226. 
Send inquiries via email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d627e6923696b6c7f7e4d606c646123606461"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="06697562286260677475466b676f6a286b6f6a">[email protected]</span></a> and reference ``Early 
Engagement Opportunity: Implementation of NDAA for FY 2021'' in the 
subject line.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD is providing an opportunity for the 
public to provide early inputs on implementation of the National 
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 within the 
acquisition regulations. The public is invited to submit early inputs 
on sections of the NDAA for FY 2021 via the DARS website at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/early_engagement.html. The website will be 
updated when early inputs will no longer be accepted. Please note, this 
venue does not replace or circumvent the rulemaking process. DARS will 
engage in formal rulemaking, in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1707, when it 
has been determined that rulemaking is required to implement a

[[Page 35076]]

section of the NDAA for FY 2021 within the acquisition regulations.

    Authority:  DoD Instruction 5000.35, Defense Acquisition 
Regulations (DAR) System.

Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2021-14009 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer and Director of New
Jersey Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2009

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCHFred W. Brackebusch,
President, Treasurer & Director

---
exv10w19






Exhibit 10.19




BASE SALARIES OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT



The following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) of the executive officers of the
Company:










	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Title	 	Base Salary(1)
	Solomon S. Steiner
	 	$	375,000	 
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 
	Gerard J. Michel
	 	$	310,000	 
	Chief Financial Officer, Vice President Corporate Development and Treasurer
	 	 	 	 
	Alan Krasnser
	 	$	305,000	 
	Chief Medical Officer
	 	 	 	 
	Paul Bavier
	 	$	205,000	 
	General Counsel and Secretary
	 	 	 	 
	Erik Steiner
	 	$	200,000	 
	Vice President, Operations
	 	 	 	 
	Roderike Pohl
	 	$	200,000	 
	Vice President, Research
	 	 	 	 









 




			
	(1)	 	Base salaries effective December 1, 2008.
# C_2021329EN.01002001.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro and Others v Commission

(Case T-635/19) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - State aid - Banking sector - Planned recapitalisation by a consortium of banks governed by private law for the benefit of one of its members - Measures authorised by the Central Bank of the Member State - Waiver of rescue and initiation of a resolution procedure - Directives 2014/49/EU and 2014/59/EU - Decision not to raise objections - Requests for information and positions adopted by the Commission during the preliminary examination stage - No causal link)

(2021/C 329/24)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro (Pesaro, Italy), Montani Antaldi Srl (Pesaro), Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Fano (Fano, Italy), Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Jesi (Jesi, Italy), Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio della Provincia di Macerata (Macerata, Italy) (represented by: A. Sandulli and B. Cimino, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Stancanelli, I. Barcew, A. Bouchagiar and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants inter alia on account of unlawful conduct on the part of the Commission preventing the rescue of Banca delle Marche.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro, Montani Antaldi Srl, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Fano, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Jesi and Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio della Provincia di Macerata to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro, Montani Antaldi Srl, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Fano, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Jesi and Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio della Provincia di Macerata to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.

---
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Periodic Report**     Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officerof Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the undersigned’sknowledge: (1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: November 6, 2006            /s/ Terrance D. Paul         Name: Terrance D. Paul    Title: Chief Executive Officer  THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joel Billy, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 514]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), rendered July 6, 2009, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the People’s *reverse-Batson*challenge *(see Batson v Kentucky,*476 US 79 [1986]; *People v Luciano,*10 NY3d 499, 502-503 [2008]; *People v Kern,*75 NY2d 638 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 824 [1990]). The Supreme Court’s determination that defense counsel’s proffered reasons for challenging the juror in question were pretextual is entitled to deference and is supported by the record *(see People v Clarke,*64 AD3d 612 [2009]; *People v Richie,*217 AD2d 84, 89 [1995]). Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven P.
Berry, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 27, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of NeoMagic Corporation.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 15, 2008
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ Steven P. Berry    
|Name:                    |  | Steven P. Berry        
|Title:                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
1 The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2785

___________ George W. Carlisle, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Missouri Highways and Transportation * Commission, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 1, 2008 Filed: January 13, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. George W. Carlisle, Jr., app eals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman , 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was properl y granted for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 31.1


                                    CERTIFICATION
                               PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                           OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Yonglin Du, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A of Dahua Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

       a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

       b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

       c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board
of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: December 20, 2006


/s/ Yonglin Du
-----------------------------
Yonglin Du, President & CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1920

ELVIS DAVID LEWIS, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, 

 Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: April 20, 2009 Decided: May 6, 2009 

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, 

Virginia, for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant 

Attorney General, Blair T. O’Connor, Assistant Director, Ari 

Nazarov, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Elvis David Lewis, a native and citizen of Grenada, 

seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

(Board) declining to exercise its sua sponte authority to grant 

Lewis’s third motion to reconsider. We do not have jurisdiction 

to review the Board’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte 

power to grant relief. See Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 

400-01 (4th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the petition for 

review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

PETITION DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40491 Summary Calendar

CLINTON BOYD Plaintiff-Appellant

v. AMIR MOHAMMAD; DENECE BOSS Defendants-Appellees

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont

USDC No. 1:98-CV-1942

-------------------- March 30, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Clinton Boyd, Texas prisoner no. 543542, appeals the magistrate judge’s dismissal, as frivolous, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. Boyd’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See Cupit v. Jones , 835 F.2d 82, 86 (5th Cir. 1987). Boyd’s motions to supplement the record are DENIED AS MOOT. Boyd complains that Texas Department of Criminal JusticeInstitutional Division (TDCJ-ID) employees denied him medically-2

necessary snacks, repeatedly gave him an incorrect dosage of medicine, and gave him crushed, as opposed to whole, medication. These allegations show, at the most, negligence and do not rise to the level of a civil rights violation. See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Boyd’s allegation that he received a light burn from contact that hot prison food made with his skin asserts only a de minimis physical injury, and the force used is not repugnant to the conscience of mankind, thus Boyd has no claim for § 1983 relief. See Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). Because Boyd’s claims lack arguable basis in law or fact, the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in dismissing Boyd’s claims as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Siglar , 112 F.3d at 193. AFFIRMED.