alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2



CC Master Credit Card Card Trust II

Series 1996-C

2003 Distributions



Pursuant to Section 5.2(c) of the CC Master Credit

Card Trust II Series 1996-C Supplement to the Agreement,

Bank
One, Delaware, N.A., must provide the following

information on an aggregate basis for the year ended

December 31, 2003:



|   |  |    |  |                                                                                                                                                                      |  |   |          |  | 
|-- |  | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | -------- |  | 
|A. |  | 1. |  | The total amount of the distribution to Class ACertificateholders during 2003 per $1,000original certificate principal amount.                                       |  | $ | 1,013.88 |  | 
|   |  |    |  |                                                                                                                                                                     
|   |  | 2. |  | The amount of the distribution set forth in paragraph
1 above in respect of interest on the Class A Certificates, per $1,000 original certificate principal amount.  |  | $ | 13.88    |  | 
|   |  |    |  |                                                                                                                                                                     
|   |  | 3. |  | The amount of the distribution set forth in paragraph
1 above in respect of principal on the Class A Certificates, per $1,000 original certificate principal amount. |  | $ | 1,000.00 |  | 
|   |  |    |  |                                                                                                                                                                     
|B. |  | 1. |  | The total amount of the distribution to Class B Certificateholders during 2003 per $1,000original certificate principal amount.                                      |  | $ | 16.25    |  | 
|   |  |    |  |                                                                                                                                                                     
|   |  | 2. |  | The amount of the distribution set forth in paragraph
1 above in respect of interest on the Class B Certificates, per $1,000 original certificate principal amount.  |  | $ | 16.25    |  | 
|   |  |    |  |                                                                                                                                                                     
|   |  | 3. |  | The amount of the distribution set forth in paragraph
1 above in respect of principal on the Class B Certificates, per $1,000 original certificate principal amount. |  | $ |         |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 13 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 13

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas over 2,000,000 members of the United States Armed Forces have deployed 
        to theaters of war since the commencement of Operation Enduring Freedom, 
        Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn;
Whereas hundreds of thousands of members of the United States Armed Forces have 
        deployed for multiple tours of duty, leaving their homes, their 
        families, and in many cases, their civilian jobs;
Whereas more than 5,500 members of the United States Armed Forces have made the 
        ultimate sacrifice for the United States while serving in Iraq or 
        Afghanistan;
Whereas tens of thousands of members of the United States Armed Forces have been 
        seriously wounded in the line of duty while serving in Iraq or 
        Afghanistan;
Whereas the members of the United States Armed Forces who have participated in 
        Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New 
        Dawn have answered the call to duty of the United States, serving 
        bravely and nobly and, in most cases, without fanfare or acclaim;
Whereas those members of the United States Armed Forces and veterans have 
        personified the virtues of patriotism, service, duty, courage, and 
        sacrifice; and
Whereas the people of the United States recognize the service and sacrifices 
        made by those members of the United States Armed Forces and veterans, as 
        well as their families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) honors the members of the United States Armed Forces 
        who are serving in, or have served in, Operation Enduring 
        Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn; and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to reflect on 
        the service of those members of the United States Armed Forces 
        and veterans and to hold those members and veterans in a 
        special place of honor, both now and in the future.

            Passed the Senate May 25, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 13

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Honoring the service and sacrifice of members of the United States 
Armed Forces who are serving in, or have served in, Operation Enduring 
       Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn.
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Bernard Schwartz, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
Loral Orion, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    [Intentionally omitted];4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Bernard L. SchwartzBernard L. SchwartzChief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2004
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-80539, 333-1854, 333-68323,333-102028 and 333-119545 on Form S-8, and Amendment No. 4 to Registration StatementNo. 333-75386 on Form S-3, of our report dated March 23, 2005, relating to thefinancial statements and financial statement schedule of META Group, Inc.(which report includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and OtherIntangible Assets”), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of META Group,Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
| Stamford, Connecticut         |
| March 29, 2005                |

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Melanie Layton, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered on December 4, 1984, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Fein, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.
Exhibit **





UNSECURED NOTE PAYABLE





CAD $300,092 Toronto, Ontario


March 10, 2015





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, LiveReel Media Corporation (“LiveReel”or the “Borrower”), a Canadian Corporation hereby covenants and promises to pay to SimKap Advisory Corp. (“SimKap” or the “Lender”), in the manner hereinafter provided, the principal sum of three hundred thousand and ninety-two Canadian dollars plus accrued interest (CAD $300,092) (the “Note”).





The Note shall be unsecured and due on demand. The Note will be subject to twelve percent (12%) interest per annum, such interest will accrue monthly and will be added to the principal.





Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, any notice, report or other communication which may be or is required to be given or made pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been validly served, given or hand delivered or sent by facsimile, or other electronic communication, or three (3) days after deposit in the mail with Canada Post, with proper first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party to be notified or to such other address as any party hereto may designate for itself by like notice, as follows:





if to the Borrowers, at:





LiveReel Media Corporation


70 York Street


Suite 1610


Toronto, ON


M5J 1S9


Attention:  Ashish Kapoor


Email: a2kapoor@gmail.com





if to the Lender, at:





SimKap Advisory Corp.


70 York Street


Suite 1610


Toronto, ON


M5J 1S9


Attention:  J. Graham Simmonds


Email: jgrahamsimmonds@gmail.com





This Note is intended as a contract under and shall be construed and enforceable in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario, and the laws of Canada applicable therein.








[signature page follows]





1











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Note to be executed and delivered by its duly authorized officer as of the date and at the place first above written.








LIVEREEL MEDIA CORPORATION








By: /s/ Ashish Kapoor


Name: Ashish Kapoor


Title: Chief Financial Officer








SIMKAP ADVISORY CORP.








By: /s/ J. Graham Simmonds


Name: J. Graham Simmonds


Title: Partner
IIA 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

Disapproving a rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to the 

certification of nonimmigrant workers in temporary or seasonal nonagricultural employment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2012 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BURR, and Mr. 

SHELBY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving a rule submitted by the Department of Labor 

relating to the certification of nonimmigrant workers in 

temporary or seasonal nonagricultural employment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the final rule published by the 

4 Department of Labor in the Federal Register on February 

5 21, 2012, entitled ‘‘Temporary Non-Agricultural Employ6 ment of H–2B Aliens in the United States’’ (77 Fed. Reg. 

7 10038), relating to the certification of nonimmigrant 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 38 IS 

1 workers in temporary or seasonal nonagricultural employ2 ment, and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2020348EN.01001901.xml

| 19.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/19

---

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Koopman International v EUIPO — Tinnus Enterprises and Mystic Products (fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-840/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Suspension of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 348/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by G. van den Bergh and B. Brouwer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by A. Odle, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the provisional decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 September 2019 (Case R 1008/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mystic Products Import & Export and Koopman International, on the one hand, and Tinnus Enterprises, on the other hand.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Koopman International BV shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Tinnus Enterprises LLC. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Koopman International BV shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Tinnus Enterprises LLC.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.

---
#### Maureen P. O'Connell, Appellant, v John J. O'Connell, Respondent.

— Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court denying plaintiff a divorce, entered November 7, 1984 in Albany County, upon a decision of the court at Trial Term (Williams, J.), without a jury.

Plaintiff contends that Trial Term erred in finding the proof adduced at trial insufficient to establish that defendant’s *824conduct constituted cruel and inhuman treatment within the meaning of Domestic Relations Law § 170 (1). We disagree and affirm.

The trial court has broad discretion as to whether to grant a cruelty divorce, but "such a divorce cannot be granted simply because the court concludes that there is a 'dead marriage’ ” *(Brady v Brady,*64 NY2d 339, 345-346). In the *Brady*case, the court reaffirmed its holding in *Hessen v Hessen*(33 NY2d 406), explaining: "In *Hessen v Hessen** * * we held that a plaintiff seeking a divorce under the cruel and inhuman treatment subdivision must show serious misconduct, and not mere incompatibility. Subsequent cases have established that a plaintiff, relying on this subdivision, must generally show a course of conduct by the defendant spouse which is harmful to the physical or mental health of the plaintiff and makes cohabitation unsafe or improper * * * The subdivision requires a finding of fault and thus a showing of irreconcilable or irremediable differences is insufficient by itself’ *(Brady v Brady, supra,*p 343 [citations omitted]).

An additional principle, relevant to this case, is the requirement of "a high degree of proof of cruel and inhuman treatment where there is a marriage of long duration” *(id.,*p 344). A review of the record in light of these principles convinces us that Trial Term properly found plaintiff’s proof insufficient to meet her heavy burden, despite evidence of lack of communication, unpleasantness, strain and irreconcilable differences between the parties, which prompted Trial Term to state that the parties’ marriage, having lasted 22 years and produced eight children, "will not be saved”.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
# C_2019139EN.01006001.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/60

---

Action brought on 30 January 2019 — Cham Holding and Bena Properties v Council

(Case T-55/19)

(2019/C 139/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Cham Holding Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) and Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | Declare the applicants’ action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the applicants’ action admissible and well founded;

| — | Accordingly, order the European Union to pay compensation in respect of all of the harm suffered by the applicants, in the amount determined, in equity, by the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

Accordingly, order the European Union to pay compensation in respect of all of the harm suffered by the applicants, in the amount determined, in equity, by the General Court;

| — | In the alternative, order the appointment of an expert with a view to establishing the scale of the harm suffered by the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, order the appointment of an expert with a view to establishing the scale of the harm suffered by the applicants;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on one main plea in law and a plea in the alternative, alleging harm suffered by the applicants for which liability rests with the Council of the European Union.

The main plea alleges that the disputed restrictive measures, namely Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria and its subsequent implementing acts, are unlawful. First, it is claimed that those measures infringe the obligation to state reasons as provided in Article 296 TFEU and Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Freedoms of the European Union; and, second, that they infringe the applicants’ right to property and their right to respect for their reputation. It is claimed that that infringement has directly caused significant non-material and material harm to the applicants consisting, respectively, in (i) damage to their reputation and (ii) breach of contract, loss of equipment and loss of revenue, in respect of which they are entitled to compensation.

The plea in the alternative alleges the existence of a system of strict liability under EU law.

---
# C_2020103EN.01002901.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 February 2020 — Repsol v EUIPO (INVENTEMOS EL FUTURO)

(Case T-8/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark INVENTEMOS EL FUTURO - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 103/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Repsol, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.-B. Devaureix and J.C. Erdozain López, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2018 (Case R 1173/2018-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign INVENTEMOS EL FUTURO as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Repsol, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Repsol, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                          |  |                  
|------------------------- |  | -----------------
|By:                       |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer  

Date: March 10, 2011
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP






                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference  in the  Registration  Statements  on Form  S-8 File  Nos.  333-28899,
333-28901,  333-28905, 333-28931 of our Report of Independent Public Accountants
dated  January 28, 1999  included in the Form 10-K of ITLA  Capital  Corporation
dated March 30, 1999.



                                                /S/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                                Arthur Andersen LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 30, 1999