alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Extension of Revolving Line of Credit Promissory Note of The Goldfield Corp



 Exhibit 10-1 
 BB&T 
 FLORIDA UNILATERAL LETTER RENEWAL 

 11/27/2009 
 THE
GOLDFIELD CORPORATION 
 1684 W. HIBISCUS BLVD.
 MELBOURNE, FL 32901-2631
  

					
	Re:	 	Account Number	  	9660933082
			
		 	Note Number	  	00002

 Your loan with BB&T has matured/will mature on 11/28/2009. At this time, we are waiting
for the following documentation and information in order to complete our decision to renew this credit facility: 
  

	
	 FINALIZATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT LOAN REQUEST
                                         
                                         
                   .

	
	 
	
	 

 This loan was originally closed outside the state of Florida in order to save on Documentary Stamp
Taxes that would otherwise have been due. In order to avoid the necessity of traveling outside the state for a short-term renewal while we are waiting for this documentation, BB&T will grant you an extension on the maturity on this credit
facility for an additional 62 days. Your note will now be due and payable in full on 01/28/2010. All other terms and conditions of the note will remain unchanged. Please continue to make your regular monthly payment under the note. By
making this extension, BB&T is not waiving any default and is not waiving, modifying or extending any other term or condition of the note or any other document. In order to maintain the tax nature of the note, please do not sign or return this
letter to BB&T. 
  

	
	Sincerely yours,
	
	BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
	
	 /s/ JOHN B. FORBES

	
	 JOHN B. FORBES


 ACCOUNT #/ NOTE # 
 9660933082 00002 
 1797 FL (0706)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 59 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.59
                                        Agreed to August 7, 2012        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
August 2, 2012, through Tuesday, August 7, 2012, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, 
September 10, 2012, or such other time on that day as may be specified 
by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or 
adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of 
this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the 
House adjourns on any legislative day through Thursday, August 2, 2012, 
through Tuesday August 7, 2012, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, September 10, 2012, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the 
House, shall notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, 
to reassemble at such place and time as they may designate if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
**Exhibit** **21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

| Company | State of Incorporation |
|---------|------------------------|

 

Young Dental Manufacturing I, LLC...........Missouri

|   | YI Europe, Limited........................England |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|

Young Acquisitions Company.....................Missouri

|   | Panoramic Rental Corp.................Missouri |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|

Athena Technology, LLC...........................Missouri

Young PS Acquisitions, LLC......................Delaware

Young Colorado, LLC..............................Delaware

Young OS, LLC.......................................Delaware

YI Ventures, LLC.....................................Delaware

|   | Mid-West Dental Laboratory, Inc.....Indiana |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|

Young Microbrush LLC...........................Delaware

Young Microbrush International................Delaware
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                              Accountants' Consent

The Board of Directors
HIE, Inc.

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Registration Nos. 33-99034, 333-08295, 333-08293, 33-08287, 33-08283,
333-08279, 333-08271, 333-52165, 333-52155 and 333-52145) on Form S-8 and the
registration statement (Registration No. 333-55703 and 333-90849) on Form S-3 of
HIE, Inc. of our reports dated January 25, 2000, except as to note 15, which is
as of March 13, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HIE, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows and related
schedules for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1999, which reports appear in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K
of HIE, Inc.


Atlanta, Georgia
March 30, 1999


                                                             /s/ KPMG LLP
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Hal M.Krisbergh, the Chief Executive Officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc.,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-Q ofWorldGate Communications, Inc., for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003(the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and (2) theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of WorldGateCommunications, Inc.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toWorldGate and will be retained by WorldGate and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:   08/14/03 | /s/ HAL M.  KRISBERGH |   |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                             |                  |   |
|                             | Hal M. Krisbergh      |   |

 

----
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Jamie Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from an order of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), dated June 30, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law Art. 6-C).</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), dated June 30, 2014, affirmed.</p><p>Defendant was properly adjudicated a level two sex offender. Defendant's argument that the court incorrectly assessed certain risk factor points is academic, because even without the 5 points at issue, defendant would still qualify as a level two sex offender (<i>see People v Vasquez</i>, 37 AD3d 193, 193 [2007], <i>lv denied</i> 8 NY3d 812 [2007]). In any event, 5 points were correctly assessed under risk factor 14, since there is no evidence in the record demonstrating that the sentencing court ordered "specialized supervision" when imposing the sentence of probation (<i>see People v Miller</i>, 77 AD3d 1386 [2010], <i>lv denied </i>16 NY3d 701 [2011]).</p><p>Defendant's contention that he should have received a downward departure is unpreserved because he made no such application to the hearing court (<i>see People v Gillotti</i>, 23 NY3d 841, 861, n 5 [2014]; <i>People v Johnson</i>, 130 AD3d 454 [2015], <i>lv denied </i>26 NY3d 908 [2015]). In any event, we find no basis for such a departure. Contrary to defendant's contention, the nature of his crime - rubbing his groin against an autistic boy for several minutes in front of the tree at Rockefeller Plaza - was not "relatively minor" and, in any event, the factors described by defendant, which were already taken into account in the risk assessment instrument, provide no basis for a downward departure (<i>see People v Diaz</i>, 143 AD3d 552, 553 [2016]). </p><br>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.<br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: February 22, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**453 CA 15-00882**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION.

----------------------------------------------- BETH ANN PIENTA, AS SUCCESSOR EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LEE HOLDSWORTH, DECEASED, AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CAROL A. HOLDSWORTH, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND CRANE CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

K&L GATES LLP, NEW YORK CITY (MICHAEL J. ROSS, OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BAR, ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LIPSITZ & PONTERIO, LLC, BUFFALO (DENNIS P. HARLOW OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Jeremiah J. Moriarty, III, J.), entered July 10, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant Crane Co. to set aside a jury verdict.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens , 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).

Entered: July 8, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# C_2020175EN.01002701.xml

| 25.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/27

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin Bussiliikenne v Commission

(Case T-603/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2020/C 175/36)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by O. Hyvönen and N. Rosenlund, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by M. Huttunen and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: the Republic of Finland (represented by J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFUE seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 3152 final of 28 June 2019 on the State aid SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by the Republic of Finland for the applicant.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected;

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB and on the request for confidential treatment by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB and on the request for confidential treatment by the European Commission;

| 3. | The costs are reserved, with the exception of those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB, which shall bear their own costs relating to their application to intervene in the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The costs are reserved, with the exception of those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB, which shall bear their own costs relating to their application to intervene in the proceedings for interim measures.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF ADVANCED GAMING TECHNOLOGY, INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         69
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1283
<PP&E>                                            2571
<DEPRECIATION>                                     710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9301
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           244
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1697)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10279
<SALES>                                            510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   510
<CGS>                                              107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (734)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (734)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



Certification

Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of CuraGen Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 8, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.                  
|                        |  |     |  | Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.                      
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and           
|                        |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board                            
|                        |  |     |  | (principal executive officer)                    
|                        |  |    
|Dated: November 8, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ David M. Wurzer                              
|                        |  |     |  | David M. Wurzer                                  
|                        |  |     |  | Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |     |  | and Treasurer                                    
|                        |  |     |  | (principal financial and accounting officer)     



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Koco Electric, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Quar Jay, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

— Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Callahan, J.), entered on or about May 28, 1985, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs and without disbursements, and the appeal and cross appeal from the order of said court, entered on or about June 17, 1985, unanimously dismissed as nonappealable, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification By 

Richard L. Bergmark, Chief Financial Officer 

of Core Laboratories N.V.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Richard L. Bergmark, Chief Financial Officer of Core Laboratories N.V. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report").

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: February 20, 2009
/s/ Richard L. Bergmark____ 
Richard L. Bergmark 
Chief Financial Officer  
** 

 **
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 26, 2024

No. 04-23-00399-CR

EX PARTE Johny Misael PEREZ DOBLANDO

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10603CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS Johny Misael Perez 

Doblando’s appeal of the denial of his application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus for want of 

jurisdiction. We further consider Perez Doblando’s appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and 

DENY his request for mandamus relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on June 26, 2024.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of June, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 14.17 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS To the Board of Directors of
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (CVRD) We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the
Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File Nos. 333-109610; 333-109610-01) of
CVRD and Vale Overseas Limited (Vale Overseas); and (ii) the Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-110867; 333-10867-01) of CVRD and Vale
Overseas of our report dated January 26, 2004 on the consolidated financial
statements of URUCUM MINERAÇÃO S.A. which appears in the Annual Report on Form
20-F of CVRD and Vale Overseas for the year ended December 31, 2003. June 4, 2004 /s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         533,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,607,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,386,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,129,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,846,479
<PP&E>                                       1,862,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                 364,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,152,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,434,688
<BONDS>                                      6,298,959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,803
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,366,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,152,973
<SALES>                                      9,467,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,467,134
<CGS>                                        6,166,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,603,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             476,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                328,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            328,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   328,013
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>