alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019139EN.01003601.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/36

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 30 January 2019 — KD v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal

(Case C-67/19)

(2019/C 139/34)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: KD

Defendant: Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 31 of Directive 2013/32/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council (known as the ‘Procedures Directive’) be interpreted, in the light of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as meaning that it is possible for effective judicial protection to be guaranteed in a Member State even if its courts cannot amend decisions given in asylum procedures but may only annul them and order that a new procedure be conducted? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 31 of Directive 2013/32/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council (known as the ‘Procedures Directive’) be interpreted, in the light of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as meaning that it is possible for effective judicial protection to be guaranteed in a Member State even if its courts cannot amend decisions given in asylum procedures but may only annul them and order that a new procedure be conducted?

| 2. | Can Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 31 of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (known as the ‘Procedures Directive’) be interpreted, again in the light of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as meaning that legislation of a Member State which lays down a single mandatory time limit of 60 days in total for judicial proceedings in asylum matters, irrespective of any individual circumstances and without regard to the particular features of the case or any potential difficulties in relation to evidence, is compatible with those provisions? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 31 of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (known as the ‘Procedures Directive’) be interpreted, again in the light of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as meaning that legislation of a Member State which lays down a single mandatory time limit of 60 days in total for judicial proceedings in asylum matters, irrespective of any individual circumstances and without regard to the particular features of the case or any potential difficulties in relation to evidence, is compatible with those provisions?

---

(1)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

---
**CERTIFICATION**I, John T. Sentjens, Chief Financial Officer of OSI Geospatial Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of OSI Geospatial Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have:Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         207,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  739,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                   339,453
<INVENTORY>                                  1,413,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,210,126
<PP&E>                                         983,462
<DEPRECIATION>                                 488,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,728,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,600,870
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,512
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,728,092
<SALES>                                      3,405,313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,405,313
<CGS>                                        3,039,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,681,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,255,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,315,271)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,255,945)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.10


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.0

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 (333-115544) of our report dated January 20, 2006, on our audits of the
consolidated  financial statements of Minden Bancorp,  Inc. and Subsidiary as of
December  31,  2005,  and 2004 and for the years then ended as of  December  31,
2005.


/s/ Heard, McElroy & Vestal, LLP
--------------------------------
Heard, McElroy & Vestal, L.L.P.
Shreveport, Louisiana
March 31, 2006


                                      -1-
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 36 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION HALL OF THE CAPITOL.

    The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the United States Capitol are 
authorized to be used on January 21, 2013, by the Joint Congressional 
Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings 
and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the President-elect 
and the Vice President-elect of the United States.

            Passed the Senate March 1, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   To authorize the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the 
Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in 
   connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the 
inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the 
                             United States.
```
# C_2020339EN.01002201.xml

| 12.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/22

---

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2020 — Tognoli and Others v Parliament

(Joined cases T-395/19, T-396/19, T-405/19, T-408/19, T-419/19, T-423/19, T-424/19, T-428/19, T-433/19, T-437/19, T-443/19, T-455/19, T-458/19 to T-462/19, T-464/19, T-469/19 and T-477/19) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Institutional law - Single statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions - Change in the amount of pensions - Manifestly inadmissible actions)

(2020/C 339/28)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Carlo Tognoli (Milan, Italy), and the 19 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented in cases T-395/19, T-396/19, T-419/19, T-423/19, T-424/19, T-428/19, T-433/19, T-437/19, T-455/19, T-458/19 to T-462/19, T-464/19, T-469/19 and T-477/19 by M. Merola, lawyer, and in cases T-405/19, T-408/19 and T-443/19 by M. Merola and L. Florio, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the letters of 11 April 2019 drawn up, in the case of each applicant, by the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements’ Unit of the Parliament’s Directorate General for Finance concerning the adjustment of the pensions they receive following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019 of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The actions are rejected as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The actions are rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Tognoli and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Tognoli and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 280, 19.8.2019.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6706

RANDY M. KING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HOPE SELLERS, Nurse; DEBORAH WILLIAMS; DEBORAH

BURLESON, Nurse; GREGORY Q. THOMPSON, Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-97-188-3-MU)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy M. King, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Randy M. King appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See King v. Sellers, No. CA-97-188-3-MU

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
`Exhibit 10.18

                              Contract to Serve on
                      GenoMed's Scientific Advisory Board


Date: 8/15/02



By my signature below I agree to serve as a member of the Scientific Advisory
Board (SAB) of GenoMed, LLC; (the "Company").


I understand and agree that my commitment to the Company is limited to the
following items:


     a. From time to time, to provide advice, consultation or assistance via
telephone conversation, email or FAX.

     b. To provide GenoMed with my curriculum vitae, of which a brief summary,
subject to my final editorial consent, will be included on GenoMed's website (at
www.genomedics.com).

     I understand and agree that I will not at any time or in any manner,
either directly or indirectly, divulge, disclose, or communicate in any manner
any information that is proprietary to the Company. I will protect such
information and treat it as strictly confidential.

     I understand that, as a member of the Company's Scientific Advisory Board,
I may be invited by the Company to participate in additional projects, such as
helping to explain the company's scientific approach to various funding entities
such as venture capital firms, or to analyze the company's scientific data, but
that these additional projects will be negotiated on a case by case basis, and
that I am in no way obligated to perform such duties by the current contract.


     I understand and agree that the Scientific Advisory Board Contract will be
a five (5) year agreement, but that it can be terminated on 30 days' written
notice by either party for any reason whatsoever. The compensation for my
services will be paid by the Company as follows:


1. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company, exercisable upon
the first anniversary from the date of this Contract.


2. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
second anniversary from the date of this Contract.


3. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
third anniversary from the date of this Contract.


4. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
fourth anniversary from the date of this Contract.


5. The option to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company payable upon the
fifth anniversary from the date of this Contract.




Signed:/s/ Frank Johnson                     Date 8/15/02


For GenoMed, Inc:
Signed:/s/ David W. Moskowitz                Date 9/3/02`
##### 



EXHIBIT 99



| | ITLA Capital Corporation
888 Prospect Street
Suite 110
La Jolla, CA 92037
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 1, 2002

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

|    |  |                                                                                                                                
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|RE: |  | ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001;
CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT OF ASSURANCES FROM ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Ladies and Gentlemen:

ITLA Capital Corporation engages Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen) as its
independent public accountants. Andersen completed its audit work on our
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001 after March 14, 2002.

We are aware of the contents of Release Nos. 33-8070 and 34-8070 and
34-45590 and the Addition of Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X (the
Temporary Note). We have requested and received from Andersen a letter to the
effect that Andersen has represented to us that its audit was subject to
Andersens quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice
to provide reasonable assurances that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with the professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of
Andersen personnel working on audits, and availability of national office
consultation. We do not have foreign affiliates, so the assurance from Andersen
as to foreign affiliates is not relevant.

Based on the foregoing, we respectfully request that the Commission
accept our financial statements as audited by Andersen in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.



| | Respectfully submitted,
| | -----------------------



| | /s/ Timothy M. Doyle
| | --------------------



| | Timothy M. Doyle
Senior Managing Director and
Chief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
#### William P. Baez, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 70515.)

—Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated at Court of Claims, Lowery, J. (Appeal from order of Court of Claims, Lowery, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Periodic Report**     Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officerof Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the undersigned’sknowledge: (1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: August 8, 2007
# C_2020077EN.01001602.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/16

---

Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-182/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot

(Case C-589/19 P)

(2020/C 77/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: L’Oréal (represented by T. de Haan and P. Péters, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office and Guinot

By order of 7 October 2019, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) ruled that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed.

---
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LOCKWOOD, Appellant, v. BUTLER, Com’r, Respondent.

(Supreme Court; Appellate Division, First Department.

November 22, 1907.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of William Lockwood, against Edmond J. Butler, as commissioner. A. H. Scoble, for appellant. T. Connoly, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Or- 1 der filed. 1
# C_2020095EN.01002801.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2020 — Globalia Corporación Empresarial v EUIPO — Touring Club Italiano (TC Touring Club)

(Case T-44/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark TC Touring Club - Earlier EU word mark TOURING CLUB ITALIANO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Additional evidence that was submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Cross-claim)

(2020/C 95/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Globalia Corporación Empresarial, SA (Llucmajor, Spain) (represented by: A. Gómez López, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Kusturovic, J.F. Crespo Carrillo and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Touring Club Italiano (Milan, Italy) (represented by: G. Guglielmetti, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 November 2018 (Case R 448/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Touring Club Italiano and Globalia Corporación Empresarial.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Dismisses the cross-claim as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the cross-claim as inadmissible;

| 3. | With regard to the main action, orders Globalia Corporación Empresarial, SA, to pay the costs, including those incurred by Touring Club Italiano for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

With regard to the main action, orders Globalia Corporación Empresarial, SA, to pay the costs, including those incurred by Touring Club Italiano for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;

| 4. | With regard to the cross-claim, orders Touring Club Italiano to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Globalia Corporación Empresarial and by EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

4.

With regard to the cross-claim, orders Touring Club Italiano to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Globalia Corporación Empresarial and by EUIPO.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Quintel
Communications, Inc and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statement as
presented in the Company's Form 10K for the year ended November 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,939,567
<SECURITIES>                                36,511,925
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,711,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,180,214
<PP&E>                                       1,289,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                 473,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,277,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,391,001
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,469
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,870,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,277,279
<SALES>                                     42,839,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,839,840
<CGS>                                       26,952,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,952,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,881,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,382,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,458,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,923,860
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,923,860
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>