alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 140 (Monday, July 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40078-40079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15817]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open RF Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 25, 2021 pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open RF Association, Inc. filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, MixComm Inc., 
Chatham, NJ; and TMY Technology Inc., New Taipei City, TAIWAN have been 
added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Open RF Association, Inc. intends to 
file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On February 21, 2020, Open RF Association, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on March 11, 2020 (85 FR 14247).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 11, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal

[[Page 40079]]

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 8, 2021 (86 FR 
18300).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-15817 Filed 7-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 100 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 100

         Designating March 11, 2011, as ``World Plumbing Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2011

   Mr. Bennet (for himself, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Merkley, and Mr. Hatch) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                             March 14, 2011

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Designating March 11, 2011, as ``World Plumbing Day''.

Whereas the industry of plumbing plays an important role in safeguarding the 
        public health of the people of the United States and the world;
Whereas 884,000,000 people around the world do not have access to safe drinking 
        water;
Whereas 2,600,000,000 people around the world live without adequate sanitation 
        facilities;
Whereas the lack of sanitation is the largest cause of infection in the world;
Whereas in the developing world, 24,000 children under the age of 5 die every 
        day from preventable causes, such as diarrhea contracted from unclean 
        water;
Whereas safe and efficient plumbing helps save money and reduces future water 
        supply costs and infrastructure costs;
Whereas the installation of modern plumbing systems must be accomplished in a 
        specific, safe manner by trained professionals in order to prevent 
        widespread disease, which can be crippling and deadly to the community;
Whereas the people of the United States rely on plumbing professionals to 
        maintain, repair, and rebuild the aging water infrastructure of the 
        United States; and
Whereas Congress and plumbing professionals across the United States and the 
        world are committed to safeguarding public health: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates March 11, 2011, as ``World 
Plumbing Day''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Synovics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended July 31,
2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ronald
Howard Lane, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
     dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for
     the periods presented.


Dated: September 19, 2007


By: /S/ Ronald H. Lane
    -----------------------
    Ronald Howard Lane
    Chief Executive Officer



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Synovics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Synovics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 4

- 1697

_____________________________
I RINA C OLLIER ,
Petitioner
,

v.

C HARLES C OLLIER , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 19, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , W INOKUR , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Irina Collier
, pro se, Pe ti ti oner

.2 A dam Vorhis of Asheville Family Law Group, Asheville, NC , for Respondent

.
# C_2019139EN.01009601.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/96

---

Action brought on 20 February 2019 — Kande Mupompa v Council

(Case T-116/19)

(2019/C 139/96)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alex Kande Mupompa (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois, and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1940 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 9 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1940 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 9 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP;

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1931 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 9 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1931 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 9 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;

| — | rule that the provisions of Article 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP and Article 2b(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 1183/2005/EC are unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule that the provisions of Article 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP and Article 2b(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 1183/2005/EC are unlawful;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-103/19, Mende Omalanga v Council.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Americare Health
Scan, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dr. Joseph P. D'Angelo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
   the company.

Date: September 18, 2008     /s/  Dr. Joseph P. D'Angelo
      ----------------      ---------------------------
                            Dr. Joseph P. D'Angelo, President, Chief
                            Executive Officer

      September 18, 2008     /s/  Robert Cano
      ----------------      --------------------
                            Robert Cano, Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00256

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

JAMES ROY VAUGHN IV AND AMBER VAUGHN

AND IN THE INTEREST OF

J.R.V.V., S.M.E.V., AND C.A.V., CHILDREN

From the 369th District Court

Leon County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV20

- 0222

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Clerk of this Court notified the parties in a January 12, 2023 letter that the

appell ant’s brief was overdue in this cause and that the appeal may be dismissed if a

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal was not filed within twenty

- one

days of the date of the letter. No response has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is

dism issed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant’s “Motion to Strike,” filed on December 27, 2022, is dismissed as moot.In re Marriage of Vaughn Page 2 MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson , and

Justice Smith

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 15, 2023

[CV 06 ]
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of Lease
Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Intentionally omitted;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Crit S. DeMentName:
    Crit S. DeMentTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 872 

To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to modify the date as 

of which certain tribal land of the Lytton Rancheria of California is 

considered to be held in trust and to provide for the conduct of certain 

activities on the land. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2011 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to modify 

the date as of which certain tribal land of the Lytton 

Rancheria of California is considered to be held in trust 

and to provide for the conduct of certain activities on 

the land. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA. 

4 Section 819 of the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act 

5 (Public Law 106–568; 114 Stat. 2919) is amended— 

6 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘Notwith7 standing’’ and inserting the following: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 872 IS

1 ‘‘(a) ACCEPTANCE OF LAND.—Notwithstanding’’; 

2 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘The 

3 Secretary’’ and inserting the following: 

4 ‘‘(b) DECLARATION.—The Secretary’’; and 

5 (3) by striking the third sentence and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(c) TREATMENT OF LAND FOR PURPOSES OF CLASS

8 II GAMING.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

10 notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

11 Lytton Rancheria of California may conduct activi12 ties for class II gaming (as defined in section 4 of 

13 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 

14 2703)) on the land taken into trust under this sec15 tion. 

16 ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—The Lytton Rancheria of 

17 California shall not expand the exterior physical 

18 measurements of any facility on the Lytton 

19 Rancheria in use for class II gaming activities on 

20 the date of enactment of this paragraph. 

21 ‘‘(d) TREATMENT OF LAND FOR PURPOSES OF

22 CLASS III GAMING.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), for 

23 purposes of class III gaming (as defined in section 4 of 

24 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)), the 

25 land taken into trust under this section shall be treated, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 872 IS

1 for purposes of section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regu2 latory Act (25 U.S.C. 2719), as if the land was acquired 

3 on October 9, 2003, the date on which the Secretary took 

4 the land into trust.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019220EN.01001701.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/17

---

Appeal brought on 18 February 2019 by Vans, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 6 December 2018 in Case T-848/16, Deichmann SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-125/19 P)

(2019/C 220/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Vans, Inc. (represented by: M. Hirsch and M. Metzner, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Deichmann SE

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Ninth Chamber) of 6 December 2018 in Case T-848/16 and dismiss the action; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Ninth Chamber) of 6 December 2018 in Case T-848/16 and dismiss the action;

| — | order Deichmann SE to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Deichmann SE to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The General Court incorrectly proceeded on the basis that Deichmann had sufficiently substantiated the earlier marks; in particular, the General Court interpreted the concept of ‘equivalent document’ under Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95 (1) (now Article 7(2)(a)(ii) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) (2) too broadly.

Contrary to what the General Court found, an extract from the TMView database is not an ‘equivalent document’ within the meaning of Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95; this is apparent, first, from the clear wording of the provision, which refers, in respect of authorised equivalent documents, to the nature, not the origin, of the document, and, second, from the rationale behind the provision.

Nor can an extract from TMView be established as substantiating evidence on the basis of the properties of the database.

The opposition would therefore — as the Board of Appeal correctly established — have to be rejected simply because the earlier rights were not substantiated.

---

(1)  Commission Regulation of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 303, 15.12.1995, p. 1).

(2)  Commission Regulation of 5 March 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union trade mark, and repealing Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (OJ L 104, 24.4.2018, p. 1).

---
# C_2019372EN.01001402.xml

| 4.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Cluj (Romania) lodged on 23 July 2019 — Impresa Pizzarotti & C SPA Italia Sucursala Cluj v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

(Case C-558/19)

(2019/C 372/15)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Impresa Pizzarotti & C SPA Italia Sucursala Cluj

Defendant: Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Question referred

Do Articles 49 and 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union preclude national legislation such as that at issue in the present case (Articles 11(2) and 29(3) of Legea nr. 571/2003 privind Codul fiscal (Law No 571/2003 establishing the Romanian Tax Code)), which provides that a bank transfer of money from a company branch resident in one Member State to the parent company resident in another Member State may be reclassified as a revenue-generating transaction, with the consequent obligation to apply the rules on transfer pricing, whereas, if the same transaction had been effected between a company branch and a parent company, both of which were resident in the same Member State, that transaction could not have been reclassified in the same way and the rules on transfer pricing would not have been applied?

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38268-38269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15410]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-27-2021]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 106--Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; 
Authorization of Production Activity; Miraclon Corporation 
(Flexographic/Aluminum Printing Plates and Direct Imaging/Thermo 
Imaging Layer Film), Weatherford, Oklahoma

    On March 17, 2021, Miraclon Corporation submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
Subzone 106F, in Weatherford, Oklahoma.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (86 FR 17772, April 6, 2021). On July 
15, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision

[[Page 38269]]

that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: July 15, 2021.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15410 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF TRAFFIX, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   STATE OF INCORPORATION
SUBSIDIARY                                                            OR ORGANIZATION
----------                                                         ----------------------
<C>  <S>                                                           <C>
 1.  GroupLotto, Inc.                                                 Delaware
 2.  MultiBuyer, Inc.                                                 Delaware
 3.  Traffix Wireless, Inc.                                           Delaware
 4.  Quintel E-Mail, Inc.                                             Delaware
 5.  Quintelcomm, Inc.                                                Delaware
 6.  Quintel Financial Information Services, Inc.                     Delaware
 7.  Calling Card Company, Inc.                                       New York
 8.  New Lauderdale L.C                                                Florida
 9.  N.L. Corp.                                                       Delaware
10.  Creative Direct Marketing, Inc.                                  Delaware
11.  Quintel Hair Products, Inc.                                      Delaware
12.  Quintel Products, Inc.                                           Delaware
13.  Quintelco., Inc.                                                 Delaware
14.  Quintel Psychic Zone, Inc.                                       Delaware
15.  Quintel LaBuick Products, LLC                                    Delaware
</TABLE>