alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from FORM 10Q FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED 9-30-2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001030418
<NAME> BIONX IMPLANTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                       387
<INVENTORY>                                      7,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,970
<PP&E>                                           2,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                     935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,491
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,107
<SALES>                                         13,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,796
<CGS>                                            4,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (248)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,027)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,027)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,027)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Howard C. Birndorf, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Nanogen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Nanogen, Inc.

                                       By: /s/ HOWARD C. BIRNDORF
                                           -------------------------
                                       Name:  Howard C. Birndorf
                                       Title: Executive Chairman

I, Gerard A. Wills, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Nanogen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Nanogen, Inc.

                                       By: /s/ GERARD A. WILLS
                                           -------------------------
                                       Name:  Gerard A. Wills
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021053EN.01004101.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/41

---

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Universität Bremen v REA

(Case T-660/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Grant proposal - Horizon Europe - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation - Call for proposals H2020-SC6-Governance-2019 - REA decision rejecting a proposal - No representation by a lawyer - Manifest inadmissibility of the action)

(2021/C 53/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Universität Bremen (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: Professor C. Schmid, University Professor)

Defendants: Research Executive Agency (REA) (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou and V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and by R. van der Hout and C. Wagner, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of REA decision Ares(2019) 4590599 of 16 July 2019, rejecting the proposal presented by the applicant within the framework of the call for proposals H2020-SC6-Governance-2019.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Universität Bremen shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the Research Executive Agency (REA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Universität Bremen shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the Research Executive Agency (REA).

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.

---
# C_2020036EN.01003202.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — gastivo portal v EUIPO — La Fourchette (Depiction of a fork on a green background)

(Case T-267/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark depicting a fork on a green background - Earlier EU figurative mark gastivo - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 36/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: gastivo portal GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch, N. Willich and N. Achilles, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: La Fourchette SAS (Paris, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 February 2019 (Case R 1211/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between gastivo portal and La Fourchette.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders gastivo portal GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders gastivo portal GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.

---
```

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, JOSEPH P. D'ANGELO, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMERICARE HEALTH
     SCAN, INC.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly  report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
        (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
              material information relating to the registrant is made known to
              us by others, particularly during the period in which this
              quarterly  report is being prepared;
        (b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
              controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
              filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
        (c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
              effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
              our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors;
        (a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
              internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
              ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
              and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
              weaknesses in internal controls; and
        (b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
              other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
              internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
     quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date: May 16, 2003

/s/ JOSEPH P. D'ANGELO
    Chief Executive Officer
```
Side Letter - dated February 18, 2005.



 [*] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. 
 EXHIBIT 10.2E 

  

			
	 


	  	Maxygen, Inc.
 200 Penobscot Drive
 Redwood City, CA 94063
 650.298.5300 main
 650.364.2715 fax
 www.maxygen.com


 February 18, 2005 
 Dr. John Grate 
 Codexis, Inc. 
 200 Penobscot Drive 
 Redwood City, CA 94063 
 Dear John: 
 I acknowledge your
letter dated February 17, 2005, retracting the letter dated January 6, 2005 from Tassos Gianakakos. 
 This will
confirm our agreement reached in our meeting of February 18, 2005 that, based on Codexis’ representations in its letter dated February 8, 2005 regarding the expenditures made by Codexis, Inc. and Cargill, Inc. with respect to 3-HP,
Codexis has satisfied the requirements of Section 2.1.6(a) of the License Agreement entered March 28, 2002, between Codexis and Maxygen, as amended, for Subfield I, Category (b) set forth on Exhibit G to the License Agreement.

 Accordingly, Maxygen agrees that, as of the date of this letter, [*] monomers that are amino carboxylic acids, hydroxy
carboxylic acids, olefinic carboxylates and/or hydroxy acids, shall be Supplemental Products (as defined in the Agreement) that may be used to make polymers (excluding polymers for use for [*] and/or [*]). 
 Please indicate Codexis’ agreement to the foregoing by countersigning below. 
 Yours sincerely, 
 /s/ Michael S. Rabson 
 Michael S. Rabson 
  

			
	 UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED
 BY CODEXIS, INC.

		
	By: 	 	/s/ John H. Grate


			
		
	Name: 	 	John H. Grate


			
		
	Title: 	 	VP, R&D and CTO


			
		
	Date: 	 	3-4-05
# C_2019255EN.01005501.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/55

---

Action brought on 11 June 2019 — Palacio Domecq v EUIPO — Domecq Bodega Las Copas (PALACIO DOMECQ 1778)

(Case T-354/19)

(2019/C 255/68)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Palacio Domecq, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Otero Iglesias, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Domecq Bodega Las Copas, SL (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark PALACIO DOMECQ 1778 — Application for registration No 11 499 506

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 March 2019 in Case R 867/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the action well-founded and alter the contested decision by granting in its entirety the applicant’s appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO, dismissing in its entirety the cross-appeal brought by the opponent and, consequently, dismissing the intervener’s opposition in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the action well-founded and alter the contested decision by granting in its entirety the applicant’s appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO, dismissing in its entirety the cross-appeal brought by the opponent and, consequently, dismissing the intervener’s opposition in its entirety;

| — | in the alternative, and if appropriate, annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO in order for it to adopt a new decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, and if appropriate, annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO in order for it to adopt a new decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and the Board of Appeal;

| — | order the intervener to pay the costs incurred by Palacio Domecq, SL in the opposition proceedings and in the appeal before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to pay the costs incurred by Palacio Domecq, SL in the opposition proceedings and in the appeal before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and of Article 25(5) of the Delegated Regulation.

---
# C_2019246EN.01003401.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/34

---

Action brought on 22 May 2019 — Taghani v Commission

(Case T-313/19)

(2019/C 246/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jamal Taghani (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

| — | annul the contested decisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decisions;

| — | order the defendant to pay all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action for annulment, first, of the decision of EPSO of 23 July 2018 rejecting his claim for compensation brought in respect of his participation in competition EPSO/AST/111/10 and, secondly, if necessary, of the decision of 14 February 2019 rejecting his complaint, the applicant puts forward two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU and manifest errors of assessment in the defendant’s examination of the three conditions required for the Union to incur non-contractual liability. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU and manifest errors of assessment in the defendant’s examination of the three conditions required for the Union to incur non-contractual liability.

| 2. | Second plea, alleging infringement of the principle of sound administration, the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials and the obligation to state reasons arising therefrom, on the ground that the defendant did not take a position, in the contested decisions, on the argument made in the complaint relating to two conditions required for the Union to incur non-contractual liability, namely the existence of faults and the causal link. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea, alleging infringement of the principle of sound administration, the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials and the obligation to state reasons arising therefrom, on the ground that the defendant did not take a position, in the contested decisions, on the argument made in the complaint relating to two conditions required for the Union to incur non-contractual liability, namely the existence of faults and the causal link.

---
# C_2019337EN.01002301.xml

| 7.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/23

---

Action brought on 27 August 2019 — Gothe and Kunz v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (FAIR ZONE)

(Case T-589/19)

(2019/C 337/24)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicants: Oliver Gothe (Cologne, Germany), Martin Kunz (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Kruse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark FAIR ZONE — EU trade mark No 16 977 852

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 July 2019 in Case R 2253/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG’s opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG’s opposition;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 27 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 27

 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
  relating to the mitigation by States of cross-border air pollution 
                        under the Clean Air Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2011

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
  relating to the mitigation by States of cross-border air pollution 
                        under the Clean Air Act.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted to Congress by the Environmental Protection Agency on 
July 11, 2011, entitled ``Federal Implementation Plans: Interstate 
Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of SIP 
Approvals'' (76 Fed. Reg. 48208 (August 8, 2011)), relating to the 
mitigation by States of cross-border air pollution under the Clean Air 
Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### HIGGINS, Appellant, v. POWELL et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 15, 1907.)

Action by John Higgins against Sarah C. Powell and others.

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with costs, unless the appellant perfect the appeal within 20 days and pay the respondents $10 costs. On compliance, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied, without costs, and the case placed at the foot of the present calendar.
# C_2021242EN.01003201.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Falqui v Parliament

(Case T-695/19) (1)

(Institutional law - Single statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions - Change in the amount of pensions for Italian national members of parliament - Corresponding change by the European Parliament in the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Acquired rights - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality)

(2021/C 242/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Enrico Falqui (Florence, Italy) (represented by: F. Sorrentino and A. Sandulli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the note of 8 July 2019 prepared by the Parliament relating to the adjustment of the amount of the pension that the applicant receives following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019, of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati, second, of the note of 11 April 2019 prepared by the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements’ Unit of the Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finance concerning the application of the pensions that the applicant receives following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019, of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati and, third, of the opinion SJ-0836/18 of the legal service of the Parliament of 11 January 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Enrico Falqui to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Enrico Falqui to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.

---