# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16 -1452V Filed: October 12, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

LAUREL POWELL

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU);

D amages Decision Based on Stipulation ; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Curtis Webb, Twin Falls, ID, for petitioner. Mallori Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On November 3, 2016 , Laurel Powell (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleges that “[t] he trivalent influenza vaccination that she received on October 27, 2015 caused her to develop a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA). ” Petit ion at ¶ 2 ; see also Stipulation, filed Oct. 11, 2017, at ¶¶ 1-2, 4

. Petitioner adds that she also hit her upper right arm and broke her right wrist after her injured left arm gave out while lifting herself out of the bathtub approximately one month later. Petition at ¶ 14. She seeks compensation related to her SIRVA and subsequent fracture of her right wrist. Id.

at 5, ¶ 22 . Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccination in the United States, has suffered the residual effects of her injuries for more than six months and her pain appears to be permanent, and has never filed a civil action or received

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” refer ences to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2

compensation for her injuries, alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 3, 21, 25- 26 ; see also Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 27, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case for her SIRVA of the left shoulder and its related sequelae

. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1, 6. A ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA

. Ruling on Entitlement, issued Apr. 27, 2017.

O n October 11, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation

. In the stipulation, “ [r]espondent agrees that petitioner suffered a SIRVA but denies that the flu vaccine caused any other injury and further denies that her current disabilities are a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6. The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

A lump sum of $ 87 ,0 00.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner

. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id

.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.