alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 31, 2011 | /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz                                                                            |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | Name: Robert K. Moskovitz                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                            | Title: Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |

----
# C_2019155EN.01003401.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/34

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö (Sweden) lodged on 27 February 2019 — A v Migrationsverket

(Case C-193/19)

(2019/C 155/40)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A

Defendant: Migrationsverket

Questions referred

| 1. | Do the provisions of the Schengen Convention, including, in particular, the provisions on the systematic consultation of the SIS and the Schengen Borders Code and including, in particular, the requirement to hold a valid passport laid down therein, constitute obstacles to the grant of residence permits on the basis of applications which were submitted in Sweden and which are not based on grounds of protection or humanitarian grounds, when the identity is unclear? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do the provisions of the Schengen Convention, including, in particular, the provisions on the systematic consultation of the SIS and the Schengen Borders Code and including, in particular, the requirement to hold a valid passport laid down therein, constitute obstacles to the grant of residence permits on the basis of applications which were submitted in Sweden and which are not based on grounds of protection or humanitarian grounds, when the identity is unclear?

| 2. | If that is the case, can the exception on establishment of identity be governed by national law or by case-law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If that is the case, can the exception on establishment of identity be governed by national law or by case-law?

| 3. | If the situation described in paragraph 2 above is not the case, what, if any, derogation is provided for in EU law? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the situation described in paragraph 2 above is not the case, what, if any, derogation is provided for in EU law?

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-108817,333-92340, 333-84710, 333-44548, 333-60150, 333-120564, 333-127850 and 333-136551)of UTStarcom, Inc. of our report dated October 10, 2007, relating to thefinancial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in UTStarcom,Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

San Jose, CaliforniaOctober 19, 2007

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1892

TERESSA L. ANGLINMATUMONA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICRON CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:11-cv-00572-AJT-TRJ)

Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Teressa L. Anglinmatumona, Appellant Pro Se. Garen Edward 

Dodge, Jennifer Anne Harper, Joseph Erwin Schuler, JACKSON 

LEWIS, LLP, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Teressa L. Anglinmatumona seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order granting summary judgment to Micron Corporation on 

her claims of employment retaliation. We dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely 

filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on June 4, 2012.* The notice of appeal was filed on July 6, 

2012. Because Anglinmatumona failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * The thirtieth day of the appeal period fell on July 4, 

2012, a legal holiday. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1)(C), 

(a)(6)(A). Thus, Anglinmatumona had until July 5, 2012, to file 

a timely notice of appeal.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas R.
Young, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 27, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of NeoMagic Corporation.

Date: May 30, 2008

By:

/s/ Douglas R. YoungName:

Douglas R. YoungTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000041 07-OCT-2015 08:38 AM
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 12

Rose Hills Company. and Subsidiaries
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in Millions)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                      Three months ended                   Six months ended     
                                                           June 30,                             June 30,        
                                                      1997         1996                    1997         1996    
                                                    Company     Predecessor              Company     Predecessor 
                                                    -------     -----------              -------     -----------  
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>                     <C>             <C> 
Ratio of Earnings to  
 Fixed Charges

Earnings: 
 Income before income taxes                            0.2           2.1                    1.2            3.4
 Add:  Fixed charges, net                              4.0           0.5                    8.0            0.9
                                                      ----          ----                   ----           ----
Income before income taxes
 and fixed charges, net                                4.2           2.6                    9.2            4.3

Fixed Charges: 
 Total interest expense (1)                            4.0           0.5                    8.0            0.9
 Interest factor rents                                 0.0           0.0                    0.0            0.0
                                                      ----          ----                   ----           ----

 Total fixed charges                                   4.0           0.5                    8.0            0.9

Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges                                         1.0           5.2                    1.15           4.78

Coverage deficiency (excess)                          (0.2)         (2.1)                  (1.2)          (3.4)     
</TABLE> 

                                     (13)
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (the Company), does hereby
certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. Date: June 10, 2004 /s/ Roger AgnelliName:
    Roger AgnelliTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer Date: June 10, 2004 /s/ Fabio de Oliveira BarbosaName:
    Fabio de Oliveira BarbosaTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019348EN.01000202.xml

| 14.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Straubing (Germany) lodged on 19 June 2019 — B & L Elektrogeräte GmbH v GC

(Case C-465/19)

(2019/C 348/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Straubing

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: B & L Elektrogeräte GmbH

Defendant: GC

Question referred

Does an off-premises contract within the meaning of Article 2(8)(c) of Directive 2011/83/EU, (1) with the consequence of entailing a right of withdrawal pursuant to Article 9 of the directive, arise if a trader at a trade fair who is in or in front of a sales stand that is deemed to constitute business premises within the meaning of Article 2(9) of the directive solicits a consumer who is standing in the aisle in front of the sales stand in an exhibition hall at a consumer trade fair without communicating with the trader, and the contract is subsequently concluded in the sales stand?

---

(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).

---
Exhibit 10.4





Exhibit 10.4


November 30, 2009


Mark J. Airola 

Newpark Resources, Inc. 

Vice President,
General Counsel & 

Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary 

2700 Research Forest Drive,
Suite 100 

The Woodlands, TX 77381


Re: Extension of salary reduction


Dear Mark:


This letter sets forth the terms of our agreement
relating to the extension of the 10% reduction of your annualized Base Salary and the corresponding adjustment to
your incentive compensation under the EICP as set forth in the Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated
April 22, 2009 (the “Amendment”), between you and Newpark Resources, Inc.
(“Company”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the
Amendment, the Employment Agreement, dated September 18, 2006, between you and the Company (the
“Employment Agreement”) and the Change in Control Agreement, dated January 7, 2008, between you
and the Company (the “Change in Control Agreement”). The terms of our agreement with regard to the
extension are as follows:


1. The 10% reduction to your annualized Base
Salary as set forth in the Amendment will continue in effect through March 31, 2010.


2. Beginning April 1, 2010, your annualized
Base Salary will be Two Hundred Ninety-One Thousand Forty Dollars and No Cents ($291,040.00).


3. Your Base Salary for purposes of calculating
payments under the EICP will likewise be adjusted through March 31, 2010 to reflect this 10% reduction in your
annualized Base Salary.


4. If your employment is terminated prior to
March 31, 2010 pursuant to Section 2.3 of the Employment Agreement, your “lump sum payment”
will be calculated based upon your $291,040.00 annualized Base Salary and not on your “current annual Base
Salary” of $261,936.00.


5. If your employment is terminated prior to
March 31, 2010 pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Change in Control Agreement as a result of a Change in
Control (as defined therein) or a Potential Change in Control (as defined therein), your Termination Benefit will
be calculated based upon your $291.040.00 annualized Base Salary and not on your base salary at the time of
termination of $261,936.00.





1









 





6. This 10% reduction in your annualized Base
Salary and the corresponding adjustment to your incentive compensation under the EICP do not constitute
“Good Reason” for termination by you, as defined in Section 2.3 and 3.10(b) of the Employment
Agreement, or a termination by the Company. Except for the foregoing modifications, the Amendment and the
Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


Sincerely,


Newpark Resources, Inc.


By:
/s/ Paul L. Howes                                              

Name:
Paul L. Howes

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer




Agreed to and Accepted
this 1st day of
December, 2009


/s/ Mark J. Airola                                                


Mark J. Airola



-2-





2
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification Of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



I, Jonathan M. Rothberg, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of CuraGen Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  November 10, 2003



|/s/  Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.      
|--------------------------------------
|Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.           
|Chief Executive Officer, President and
|Chairman of the Board
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 (the “Report”) by META Group, Inc. (the “Company”), each ofthe undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|                  | /s/ CD Hobbs                                |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | CD Hobbs                                    |
|                  | President and Chief Operating  Officer      |
|                  |                                        |
|                  | /s/ John W. Riley                           |   |
|                  | John W. Riley                               |
|                  | Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |
|                  |                                        |
| Dated: March 31, 2005 |                                        |
|                       |                                             |        |  |

 

----
#### Ninth Federal Savings and Loan Association, Respondent, v Samuel Gray, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 6, 1984, affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Ferraro at Special Term *(see also, Matter of Smith v McManus & Sons,*101 AD2d 890). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38328-38329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15399]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10821-000]


Pacific Gas & Electric Company; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

    On June 27, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), licensee 
for the Camp Far West Transmission Line Project No. 10821, filed an 
Application for a Subsequent License pursuant to the Federal Power Act 
(FPA) and the Commission's regulations thereunder. The Camp Far West 
Transmission Line Project is located in Placer and Yuba Counties, 
California.
    The license for Project No. 10821 was issued for a period ending 
June 30, 2021. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the

[[Page 38329]]

applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth at 
18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 10821 is issued to 
the Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), for a period effective July 
1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 or until the issuance of a new license 
for the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes 
first. If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not 
take place on or before June 30, 2022, notice is hereby given that, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) 
of the FPA is renewed automatically without further order or notice by 
the Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) is authorized 
to continue operation of the Camp Far West Transmission Line Project, 
until such time as the Commission acts on its application for a 
subsequent license.

    Dated: July 13, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15399 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P