alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                     OF THE
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valley National Gases
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, William A. Indelicato, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                /s/ William A. Indelicato
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                William A. Indelicato
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                November 12, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Williams, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 783] —

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), dated April 14, 2009, which, after a hearing, inter alia, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In establishing a defendant’s appropriate risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law art 6-C), the People bear the burden of proving the facts supporting the determination by clear and convincing evidence *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Williams,*90 AD3d 880, 881 [2011]; *People v Crandall,*90 AD3d 628, 629 [2011]). Here, the People satisfied their burden of adducing facts in support of the assessment of 20 points under risk factor 3 (number of victims) by *1094clear and convincing evidence. The presentence report and the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders constituted “reliable hearsay” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]), and provided a sufficient basis for the assessment of those points *(see People v Mingo,*12 NY3d 563, 573 [2009]; *People v Williams,*90 AD3d at 881).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the County Court correctly designated the defendant a level three sex offender. Rivera, J.E, Chambers, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

THE REAL PROPERTY AND

IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS 12534 CHILTON ROAD PHILADELPHIA, PA

19154

PETITION OF: COMMONWEALTH OF

PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 659 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Unpublished Memorandum Opinion and Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 1254 CD
2014 entered on November 2, 2015, vacating and remanding the Order Dated of the Philadelphia County Court

of Comm on Pleas at No. CP

- 51

- MD

9001252

- 2004 entered on June 17,

2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16 th day of June, 2017, this petition for allowance of appeal is

hereby GRANTED , the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED , and the matter

is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court to remand to the trial court for

reconsideration in light of this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet

,

__ A.3d __, 2017 WL 2291733 (Pa. May 25, 2017).
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of META Group, Inc.

The Sentry Group, Inc. incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
MG (Bermuda) Ltd. incorporated in Bermuda
1422722 Ontario, Inc. incorporated in Canada
META Group Singapore PTE Limited incorporated in Singapore
META Group Australia Holdings PTY Limited incorporated in Australia
Abundant Strategy SDN.BHD incorporated in Malaysia
META Group France, S.A. incorporated in France
META Group AG incorporated in Germany
META Group Italia S.R.L. incorporated in Italy
META Group UK Holdings Limited incorporated in the United Kingdom
META Group Norway A/S incorporated in Norway
META Group Sweden AB incorporated in Sweden
META Group Finland OY incorporated in Finland
META Group Denmark A/S incorporated in Denmark
META Group Belgium SA incorporated in Belgium
META Group Nederland BV incorporated in the Netherlands
META Group Northern Europe ApS incorporated in Denmark
ATEM Netherlands ApS incorporated in Denmark
META Group Korea Co. Limited incorporated in South Korea
META Group IT Corp. incorporated in the Philippines
META Group Hong Kong Limited incorporated in Hong Kong
META Group Deutschland GmbH incorporated in Germany
META Group Austria GmbH incorporated in Austria
META Group Schweiz AG incorporated in Switzerland
META Group CESE GmbH incorporated in Germany
Stratis Kft. incorporated in Hungary
META Group Iberia S.L. incorporated in Spain

---

QuickLinks
Form of Supplement to Restricted Stock Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 SAKS INCORPORATED 
 Supplement to Restricted Stock
Agreement 
 «Name» 
 Name of Award Holder 
 Award Date: «Issue_Date» 
 «Number_of_Shares» 
 Number of Shares of Restricted Stock 
 Dear Award Holder: 
 This letter constitutes an “Award Supplement” referred to in that certain Restricted Stock Agreement dated [date of Agreement] (the
“Restricted Stock Agreement”) between Saks Incorporated (the “Company”) and you. You are hereby notified that the Company has awarded to you the number of shares of its common stock, $0.10 par value
indicated above (the “Restricted Stock”). The shares of Restricted Stock are awarded to you pursuant to and subject to the terms and conditions of (1) the Saks Incorporated 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), (2) the Restricted Stock Agreement, and (3) this Award Supplement. 
 Unless sooner
vested in accordance with paragraph 3 of the Restricted Stock Agreement, the restrictions imposed by paragraph 2 of the Restricted Stock Agreement will expire as to the following percentage of the Restricted Stock on the dates indicated: 

 

			
	 Percentage of Restricted Stock
	 	 Date of Expiration of Restrictions

	 100%
	 	«Expiration_Date»

  

			
	Saks Incorporated
		
	By:	 	/S/    CHRISTINE A. MORENA
	Executive Vice President—Corporate Human Resources
EXHIBIT 32.1




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Yonglin Du, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Yongling Du
-----------------------
Yonglin Du
Chief Executive Officer


August 9, 2005



A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Serial: 156313

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

No. 2008-KP-01373-SCT

WELDON FOXWORTH

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

ORDER

¶1. This matter is before the Court on Appellant Weldon Foxworth’s Notice of Appeal.

On the State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal and after due consideration, this Court finds that

the appeal is untimely and should be dismissed without prejudice. 

¶2. Weldon Foxworth pleaded guilty and was sentenced by the trial court on August 21,

2007. He did not file a Notice of Appeal with this Court until August 12, 2008. Rule 4 of

our Rules of Appellate Procedure clearly states, in pertinent part:

[I]n a civil or criminal case in which an appeal or cross-appeal is permitted by

law as of right from the trial court to the Supreme Court, the notice of appeal

required by Rule 3 shall be filed with the clerk of the trial court within 30 days

after the date of entry of the judgment or order appealed from.

Thus, after due consideration of the record and the parties’ briefs, this Court finds that

Foxworth’s Notice of Appeal was untimely filed. 

¶3. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Foxworth’s Notice of Appeal is untimely filed

and his appeal is hereby dismissed. 
2

¶4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the dismissal shall be without prejudice to

Foxworth, and he shall have leave to file a motion for post-conviction collateral relief as an

original civil action in the trial court.

¶5. SO ORDERED, this the 18 day of August, 2009. th

 /s/ Jess H. Dickinson

JESS H. DICKINSON, JUSTICE
# C_2020371EN.01001101.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/11

---

Order of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Noguer Enríquez and Others v Commission

(Case T-22/19) (1)

(Action for damages - Monetary agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra - Alleged negligence on the part of the Commission regarding the content of the agreement - Alleged negligence on the part of the Commission in monitoring the implementation of the agreement - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 371/10)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Roser Noguer Enríquez (Andorra-la-Vella, Andorra), TB, Successors d’Higini Cierco García, SA (Andorra la Vella), Cierco Martínez 2 2003, SL (Andorra la Vella) (represented by: J. Álvarez González and S. San Felipe Menéndez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of, first, negligence on the part of the Commission in monitoring the implementation of the Monetary Agreement concluded on 30 June 2011 between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra and, second, the Commission’s negligence regarding the content of that agreement.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Roser Noguer Enríquez, TB, Successors d’Higini Cierco García, SA and Cierco Martínez 2 2003, SL, are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Roser Noguer Enríquez, TB, Successors d’Higini Cierco García, SA and Cierco Martínez 2 2003, SL, are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00556-CV

Betty Richter, Appellant

v.

Keith Richter, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2005-0682A, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. The order appealed from was signed

on June 5, 2006. Because no motion or other document triggering the extended timetables was filed,

the notice of appeal was due July 5, 2006. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. The notice of appeal was not

filed until September 18, 2006. Betty Richter filed a Motion to Extend Post-Judgment Deadlines

in the trial court, requesting a finding that she did not receive notice of the judgment until August

17, 2006. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 306a. The hearing was set for September 26, 2006. The clerk’s record

filed in this appeal did not contain a ruling. Without a finding that she did not receive notice until

August 17, 2006 or later, Betty Richter’s notice of appeal was untimely filed.

By letter dated November 16, 2006, this Court’s clerk requested an explanation from

appellant regarding the apparent untimeliness of the filing of her notice of appeal. The response was
2

due November 27, 2006. The letter warned that, absent a response, the appeal would be dismissed.

Appellant did not file a response to the clerk’s request. At this Court’s request, the

Comal County District Clerk sent a copy of the district court’s docket sheet listing orders of the

court. This sheet contains the notation “motion to extend denied” on September 26, 2006. 

Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, we lack jurisdiction over this

appeal. See Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 564 (Tex. 2004). We dismiss

this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 14, 2007
**Exhibit
      32.2**


SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Med-Emerg International Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, , to the best of
      such officer’s knowledge, that:







1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date:May
                15, 2007By:
            /s/
                William DanisWilliam
                DanisChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting
                Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Tony G. Holcombe, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 13, 2007 |  | /s/ TONY G. HOLCOMBE   
|                      |  | Tony G. Holcombe       
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Barbara Monroe, Respondent, v Albert Antor and Son Jewelers et al., Defendants, and Brinn and Sicker, Appellant.

—In an action commenced in the First District Court, Nassau County, *inter alia,*to recover damages for conversion, defendant Brinn and Sicker appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated April 24, 1985, as denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint, insofar as it is asserted against it.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, motion granted, and complaint dismissed as against defendant Brinn and Sicker.

The plaintiff did not properly serve process on the appellant, a partnership, as required by CPLR 310. Even if the plaintiff’s subsequent service of process were to be considered, reversal would still be required since the plaintiff has not established that the appellant, which has its place of business in New York County, was properly subject to the jurisdiction of the District Court *(see,*UDCA 404 [a] [1]). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.
# C_2022389EN.01002402.xml

| 10.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/24

---

Order of the General Court of 25 August 2022 — Silgan International and Silgan Closures v Commission

(Case T-808/19) (1)

(2022/C 389/28)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

---
**Exhibit 21.2**

----

**Subsidiaries and Joint Venture of Registrant**

**TB Wood’s Corporation, Subsidiaries and Joint Venture**

**January 2, 2004**

| Registrant: | TB Wood’s Corporation (Delaware) |
|-------------|----------------------------------------|
|        |                                   |   |   |   |
|        | Subsidiary:                            | TB Wood’s Incorporated (Pennsylvania) |
|        |                                   |   |   |   |
|        |                                   | Subsidiaries: | Plant EngineeringConsultants, Inc. (Tennessee) |
|        |                                   |   | T.B. Wood’s Canada Ltd (Canada) |
|        |                                   |   | Industrial Blaju, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) |
|        |                                   |   | TB Wood’s (Deutschland) GmbH (Germany) |
|        |                                   |   |   |   |
|        |                                   |   | Subsidiaries: | Berges electronics GmbH (Germany) |
|        |                                   |   |   | Berges electronics S.r.l. (Italy) |
|        |                                   |   |   |   |
|        |                                   |   | TB Wood’s Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware) |
|        |                                   |   |   |   |
|        |                                   | Joint Venture: | TB Wood’s (India) Private Limited (India) |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned  officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage  Securities Corp., a
Delaware  corporation (the "Company")  hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE  SECURITIES
CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-MS1, as follows:

     1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

     2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

     3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate
on behalf of the Company.

     4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

     5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #17001 and #17002; Louisiana Disaster Number LA-00113]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-4590-DR), dated 06/22/2021.

*Incident:*                         Severe Winter Storms.                    

*Incident Period*: 02/11/2021 through 02/19/2021.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 07/09/2021.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/23/2021.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/22/2022.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Louisiana, dated 06/22/2021, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Parishes:*                     Bienville, Calcasieu, Caldwell, Claiborne, Franklin, Iberville, Livingston,                           ( print page 38175)                        Natchitoches, Rapides, Richland, Sabine, Tensas, Webster, West Carroll.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator, for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2021-15268 Filed 7-16-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P