alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Douglas R. Young, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended August 2, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation.




Date:
September 15, 2009


By:
                      /s/
      Douglas R. YoungName:
                      Douglas
      R. YoungTitle:
                      Chief
      Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.1

                        [OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION LOGO]

                                ROYALTY AGREEMENT

This  agreement  is made  effective  this first day of  November,  1993,  by and
between Robert  Kopstein and Optical Cable  Corporation  (herein  referred to as
OCC).

WHEREAS Robert Kopstein as an owner of the rights to certain cable manufacturing
techniques and equipment designs (hereinafter referred to as TECHNOLOGY) granted
him by Cable Technology, Inc., by agreement dated June 30, 1983.

WHEREAS Robert Kopstein  desires to receive  Royalty  Payments for the continued
use of the TECHNOLOGY by OCC.

WHEREAS it is in the best  interest of OCC to have the  exclusive  rights to the
use of the TECHNOLOGY without restriction.

Now THEREFORE the parties do hereby agree as follows:

1.       Robert Kopstein  hereby grants to OCC the exclusive  license to use the
         TECHNOLOGY without restriction for a period of one year.

2.       Robert  Kopstein  shall not  sell,  transfer  or  further  license  the
         TECHNOLOGY to any other parties for a period of one year.

3.       OCC agrees to pay Robert  Kopstein in Royalty  Payment equal to 4.5% of
         its  net  sales  under  the  license  granted  herein.   For  each  new
         manufacturing  facility  established  outside  the  continental  United
         States (utilizing the TECHNOLOGY), OCC agrees to pay Robert Kopstein an
         additional 1.5% Royalty Payment. Total Royalty Payment shall be limited
         to 10% of net sales  generated by OCC and future  affiliates  utilizing
         the TECHNOLOGY.

         Example

         Optical Cable Corporation                  Royalty (%)
         -------------------------                  -----------
         OCC + 1 additional overseas facilities         4.5
         OCC + 2 additional overseas facilities         6.0
         OCC + 3 additional overseas facilities         7.5
         OCC + 4 additional overseas facilities        10.0

Said Royalty Payments are to be made by the close of each OCC fiscal year.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                          <C>              <C>                  <C>
   Shipping Address:         Phone No.        (703) 265-0690            Mailing Address:
                             TELEX            705-290
5290 Concourse Drive         FAX              (703) 265-0724            P.O. Box 11967
 Roanoke, VA 24019           Sales Dept.      1-800-622-7711       Roanoke, VA 24022-1967
</TABLE>

<PAGE>



/s/ Robert Kopstein                       /s/ Robert Kopstein
-------------------------                 --------------------------------------
Robert Kopstein                           Robert Kopstein
                                          Optical Cable Corporation




    [Notary Signature]                    /s/ Kenneth W. Harber
------------------------                  --------------------------------------
Notary                                    Kenneth W. Harber, Secretary/Treasurer
                                          Optical Cable Corporation
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Kentucky
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Buckner Woodford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.



                              ___/s/ Buckner Woodford_____
                              Chief Executive Officer

                              March 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and
will be retained by Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

86
#### Miguel Castillo, Respondent, v General Accident Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

Order, Appellate *113Term, First Department, entered July 13, 1984, which affirmed an order of the Civil Court (E. Goodman, J.), entered February 14, 1984, granting summary judgment to the plaintiff insured on the issue of liability and directing a hearing on damages, reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion for summary judgment is denied.

In an action to recover under an insurance policy for damages sustained as a result of the theft of an automobile registered in the plaintiff’s name, which was found totally vandalized, plaintiff moved for summary judgment. In its opposing papers defendant pointed to a variety of allegedly suspicious circumstances which, defendant claimed presented an issue of plaintiff’s credibility that could only properly be determined on trial.

Among the circumstances set forth were the following. First, shortly before the alleged theft which gave rise to the instant action, plaintiff had recovered from defendant on an insurance claim arising out of the alleged theft of the same automobile. Second, plaintiff’s claim in his moving affidavit that the vehicle was recovered by the police is contradicted by the police report which states that the vehicle was recovered by plaintiff. Third, on the prior theft the estimate of the damage and the work of repair was done by a company for which plaintiff’s brother worked.

Special Term granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on liability and directed a hearing with regard to damages. The Appellate Term affirmed. We disagree, finding that the circumstances disclosed in the record raise an issue of plaintiff’s credibility with regard to a matter within his exclusive knowledge sufficient to require a trial. *(See, Wertheimer v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*85 AD2d 540, 541; *Suslensky v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*180 Misc 624, *affd*267 App Div 812.) Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Carro, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
# C_2019072EN.01004001.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/40

---

Action brought on 3 January 2019 — Thai World Import & Export v EUIPO — Elvir (Yaco)

(Case T-3/19)

(2019/C 72/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Thai World Import & Export Co. Ltd (Bangkok, Thailand) (represented by: S. Bénoliel-Claux, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Elvir (Conde sur Vire, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark ‘Yaco’ — Application for registration No 14 980 148

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 October 2018 in Case R 319/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2020137EN.01002702.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 27 December 2019 — SIA ‘ONDO’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

(Case C-943/19)

(2020/C 137/37)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant at first instance and appellant on a point of law: SIA ‘ONDO’

Respondent in the appeal proceedings: Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’, defined in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102 EEC, (1) an autonomous concept of EU law? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’, defined in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102 EEC, (1) an autonomous concept of EU law?

| 2. | Are the costs of extending the credit included in the concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102 EEC, in circumstances such as those of the present case, if the clauses on extending the credit form part of the terms and conditions of the credit agreement agreed by the borrower and the lender? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are the costs of extending the credit included in the concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ in Article 3(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102 EEC, in circumstances such as those of the present case, if the clauses on extending the credit form part of the terms and conditions of the credit agreement agreed by the borrower and the lender?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.

---
# C_2020371EN.01003001.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/30

---

Order of the General Court of 24 July 2020 — VG v Commission

(Case T-299/19) (1)

(2020/C 371/34)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Tony G. Holcombe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                         
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated: February 26, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    TONY G.
HOLCOMBE                 
|                         |  |  |  | Tony G. Holcombe Chief Executive Officer

The above certification is
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
# C_2022073EN.01003502.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI BURGER)

(Case T-595/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI BURGER - Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No detriment to repute - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2022/C 73/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, S. Baran, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fontana Food AB (Tyresö, Sweden) (represented by: P. Nihlmark and L. Zacharoff, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 June 2019 (Case R 1356/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi and Fontana Food.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 8 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 8

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas women have served with distinction in the United States Armed Forces 
        since the American Revolution and have made significant and lasting 
        contributions to the security of the United States;
Whereas in 2011, women comprise nearly 16 percent of the United States Armed 
        Forces and serve in positions of responsibility in the active and 
        reserve components of the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, and Coast 
        Guard, as compared with less than 5 percent in 1976 when women were 
        first integrated into the service academies;
Whereas women serve at the highest levels in the Department of Defense and other 
        governmental organizations contributing to the defense of the United 
        States; and
Whereas the accomplishments of generations of women have contributed to the 
        history of the United States Armed Forces and to the strength of the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the importance of women to national defense 
        throughout the history of the United States; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to honor 
        women who have served and who continue to serve the United 
        States in the United States Armed Forces.

            Passed the Senate February 28, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 8

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

      Recognizing women serving in the United States Armed Forces.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     222,480,632              33,841,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,060,000                 455,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,277,106              34,841,453
<PP&E>                                      22,252,036              24,421,106
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,825,701               5,502,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,426,335              54,286,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,153,716              12,292,008
<BONDS>                                    150,000,000                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       378,493                 134,304
<OTHER-SE>                                  76,616,071              35,425,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               246,668,438              54,286,170
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,640,340               2,671,943
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,650,543               6,972,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,499,830               3,209,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,039,496)             (7,206,927)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,039,496)             (7,206,927)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,039,496)             (7,206,927)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)                  (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)                  (0.27)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Smith, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 491]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered January 5, 2011, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Defendant received a full opportunity to present his arguments, which were properly rejected by the court *(see People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520 [1978]). Defendant, as well as new counsel appointed for the plea withdrawal motion, made written submissions. Neither defendant nor his counsel sought to amplify those submissions, and no hearing was requested.

The record establishes the voluntariness of the plea. Defendant’s claims of innocence, coercion and inadequate consultation with counsel were directly contradicted by responses defendant gave during the thorough plea allocution, and by the court’s recollection of the proceedings. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Catterson, Renwick and Richter, JJ.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer and Director of New
Jersey Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2008

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCH Fred W. Brackebusch,
President, Treasurer & Director

---
Exhibit
10.19





Director Fee
Arrangements





Fees for
the non-employee directors of Imperial Capital Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for
2008 will continue to be $1,000 per Board or board committee meeting attended,
plus a monthly retainer of $2,250.  Individual directors may also
receive honorariums for additional work performed on behalf of the
Company.  The honorariums paid to directors for 2007 were as follows:
(i) an honorarium of $7,500 to Director Robert Reed for his active assistance
with legislative and audit committee matters during 2007; (ii) an honorarium of
$5,000 to Director Jeffrey Lipscomb for his Chairmanship of the Compensation
Committee and active assistance with compensation matters; and (iii) an
honorarium of $15,000 to Director Hirotaka Oribe for his extensive work with the
Executive Committee and large loan approval process.