alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel; NEI Pathway to Independence Applications (K99).                    

*Date:*                         August 10, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ashley Fortress, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 451-2020,                         *ashley.fortress@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 15, 2021.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-15448 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                           HIE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                            Years ended December 31,
                                                                               ------------------------------------------------
                                                                                   1999              1998                1997
                                                                               ---------           --------           ---------
                                                                                    (In thousands, except for per share data)
<S>                                                                             <C>                <C>                <C>
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common shareholders                         $ (8,504)          $  1,498           $  (8,596)
                                                                                ========           ========           =========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                              25,347             24,031              22,587
                                                                                ========           ========           =========

Basic net earnings (loss) per common share                                      $  (0.34)          $   0.06           $   (0.38)
                                                                                ========           ========           =========

Shares used in diluted net earnings (loss) per share calculation:
   Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                           25,347             24,031              22,587
   Additional shares assumed outstanding from dilutive stock
     options used in diluted earnings (loss) per share                                -- *              836                  -- *
     calculation                                                                --------           --------           ---------
                                                                                  25,347             24,867              22,587

Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share                                    $  (0.34)          $   0.06           $   (0.38)
                                                                                ========           ========           =========
</TABLE>


*  Since stock options are antidilutive to the loss per common share
   calculation, stock options are not considered in such loss per share
   calculations in 1999 and 1997.
(April 12, 2012)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alberto Tineo, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 621]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), rendered December 10, 2009, convicting defendant, after a *508jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees, attempted robbery in the first and second degrees, and burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 17 years, unanimously modified, on the law, and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to reduce the sentences on the robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, attempted robbery in the second degree and burglary in the second degree convictions to concurrent sentences of 13 years, and to reduce the conviction for attempted robbery in the first degree to attempted robbery in the third degree and to reduce the sentence on that conviction to a concurrent term of lVs to 4 years, and otherwise affirmed.

Subdivision (4) of Penal Law § 160.15 defines robbery in the first degree so as to require that in the course of forcibly stealing property the perpetrator “[displays what appears to be a pistol, revolver ... or other firearm.” Such “display must actually be witnessed in some manner by the victim” of the crime *(People v Baskerville,*60 NY2d 374, 381 [1983]). The evidence supporting the attempted robbery in the first degree count is legally insufficient because it was not established that the victim under that count witnessed the display of a weapon. In fact, the victim testified that she did not see any weapons. We are not persuaded by the People’s argument that the victim’s testimony left open the possibility that she saw a gun at some point during the home invasion. Speculation is insufficient to meet the People’s burden to prove each element of the crime charged *(see People v Brown, 25*NY2d 374, 377 [1969]).

Defendant’s challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence are unpreserved and we decline to grant any further review in the interest of justice. In the alternative, we find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). Further, there is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, particularly with respect to the conflict between the People’s evidence and the defendant’s testimony as to how his palm prints came to be found on duct tape that was used to bind the hands of one of the robbery victims *(see People v Mendez,*89 AD3d 496 [2011]). We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 06, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 06, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A0551. MANCHILOT GUADIE v. DEBRE BISRAT ST. GABRIEL ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHEDO CHURCH et al..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
##### 



Exhibit 14.15 Consent of Independent Accountants To the Board of Directors of
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce S.A. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File
Nos. 333-110867; 333-10867-01) of CVRD and Vale Overseas of our report dated January
26th, 2004 on the financial statements of Rio Doce Manganês S.A. and Subsidiaries, which
appear in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of CVRD and Vale Overseas for the year ended December
31st, 2004. /s/ Deloitte Touche TohmatsuDELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
 May 30th, 2005
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 8, 2015

No. 04-15-00271-CV

ESTATE OF JOHNNIE MAE KING,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001-PC-1263

Honorable Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee’s Brief is 

GRANTED. The appellee’s brief is due on October 26, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of October, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

NANOGEN, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Nanogen Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2005 (the Report), I, Howard C. Birndorf, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  |                                                                      
|-------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  | 
|August 9, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ HOWARD C. BIRNDORF
|               |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  | Howard C. Birndorf Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,305,821
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,417,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,732,064
<PP&E>                                         475,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,668,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          963,234
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,250
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,684,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,668,360
<SALES>                                      2,870,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,870,191
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,757,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             403,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                709,033
<INCOME-TAX>                                   267,305
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            441,728
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   441,728
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.32
 RETIREMENT RESTORATION PLAN
      Definitions




---



##### 



- 2 -




---



##### 



Nature of Plan
 Plan Administration
 Plan Benefit
   - 3 -




---



##### 



Vesting of Plan Benefit .
 Payment of Accrued Benefit
     - 4 -




---



##### 



Designation of Beneficiaries
 Source of Benefits
 Amendment and Termination
 Spendthrift Provision
 Employment Noncontractual
  - 5 -




---



##### 



Adoption by Other Employers
 Claims Procedure
 Tax Withholding
 Special Distributions
 Compliance with Code Section 409A
 Pre-Restatement Benefit Payments
 Applicable Law
  - 6 -




---



##### 



th
 NOBLE DRILLING CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Julie J. RobertsonTitle:      Executive Vice President  - 7 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         437,803
<SECURITIES>                                   362,652
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,379
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               822,858
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 822,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,091
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

B.T. MANAGEMENT, LLC,

Petitioner

v.

7065-A WILLIAM PENN HIGHWAY, LLC,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 320 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


          This
Amendment dated as of December 14, 2009 (this “Amendment”) to that certain
Third Amended Employment Agreement by and between Steven Madden, Ltd., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Steven Madden (the “Employee”) .


W I T N E S S E T H:


          WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee are
parties to that certain Third Amended Employment Agreement executed as of July
15, 2005 and effective as of July 1, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”), a copy
of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and


          WHEREAS, the Company believes it to be in
the best interests of the Company to extend the term of the Employment
Agreement to further secure the services of the Employee for five years beyond
the term reflected in the Employment Agreement and the Employee is agreeable to
such extension;


          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
agreement of the parties contained herein and for ten dollars and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged,, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as
follows:


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
1.

	
Effective as of the date
  of this Amendment, the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
a.

	
Section 3 of the
  Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and in lieu thereof the
  following paragraph shall be inserted:


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
“Section 3. TERM OF
  EMPLOYMENT. The term of Employee’s employment, unless sooner terminated as
  provided herein, shall commence on the Effective Date of this Third Amended
  Employment Agreement and end on December 31, 2019 (the “Term”).”


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
2.

	
Except as modified hereby,
  all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
  full force and effect.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
IN
  WITNESS WHEREOF, the
  parties hereto have executed this Amendment of date first set forth above.








	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
By:

	
/s/ Edward R. Rosenfeld


	
 

	
 

	 


	
 

	
Name:

	
Edward R. Rosenfeld


	
 

	
Title:

	
Chief Executive Officer


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
/s/ Steven Madden


	
 

	 


	
 

	
STEVEN
  MADDEN
Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bionx Implants, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Drew Karazin, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and the consolidated results of operations of
         the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: November 14, 2002


                                                  /s/ Drew Karazin
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Drew Karazin
                                                  Chief Financial Officer



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
# C_2021452EN.01002201.xml

| 8.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 452/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 452/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Ashworth and Others v Parliament

(Joined Cases T-720/19 to T-725/19) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the Parliament - Amendment of the additional voluntary pension scheme - Notice fixing additional voluntary pension rights - Plea of illegality - Competence of the Bureau of the Parliament - Rights acquired or in the process of being acquired - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Legal certainty)

(2021/C 452/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Richard Ashworth (Lingfield, United Kingdom) and the five other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: A. Schmitt and A. Grosjean, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, M. Ecker and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Parliament’s decisions contained in the notices fixing the applicants’ additional voluntary pension rights in so far as they introduce, for pensions established after 1 January 2019, a special levy of 5 % of the nominal amount of the pension, payable directly to the additional voluntary pension fund, pursuant to the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 10 December 2018 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (OJ 2018 C 466, p. 8).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-720/19 to T-725/19 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-720/19 to T-725/19 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders Mr Richard Ashworth and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Richard Ashworth and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.

---
**Exhibit 21**
**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**                 **Percentage**     **State of**    **of**     **Incorporation or****Parent** **Subsidiary** **Ownership**     **Organization**ITLA Capital Corporation Imperial Capital Bank  100%     California             ITLA Capital Corporation ITLA Funding Corporation  100%     Delaware             ITLA Funding Corporation ITLA Servicing Corporation  100%     Delaware             ITLA Funding Corporation ITLA Commercial Warehouse Corporation  100%     Delaware             ITLA Capital Corporation ITLA Management Corporation  100%     Delaware             ITLA Management Corporation ITLA Commercial Investment Corporation  100%     Maryland             ITLA Capital Corporation Imperial Capital Real Estate Investment Trust  100%     Delaware             ITLA Capital Corporation ITLA Capital Statutory Trust I  100%  (1) ConnecticutITLA Capital Corporation ITLA Capital Statutory Trust II  100%  (1) ConnecticutITLA Capital Corporation ITLA Capital Statutory Trust III  100%  (1) DelawareITLA Capital Corporation ITLA Capital Statutory Trust IV  100%  (1) DelawareITLA Capital Corporation ITLA Capital Statutory Trust V  100%  (1) Connecticut
*(1)* *Represents ownership of the common securities of the trust.*
80