alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      29,677,000
<SECURITIES>                                58,427,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,993,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,000,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            97,939,000
<PP&E>                                       1,821,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 300,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,617,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,122,000
<BONDS>                                        199,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       214,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,082,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,617,000
<SALES>                                      2,916,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,916,000
<CGS>                                       10,574,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,247,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             201,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (23,862,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (23,862,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (1,019,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (24,881,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.64)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                          |  |                  
|------------------------- |  | -----------------
|By:                       |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer  
|                         
|Date: March 12, 2013     



71
# C_2019372EN.01002302.xml

| 4.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/23

---

Appeal brought on 5 September 2019 by NeXovation, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-353/15: NeXovation v Commission

(Case C-665/19 P)

(2019/C 372/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: NeXovation, Inc. (represented by: A. von Bergwelt, M. Nordmann, L. Hettstedt, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside points 3 and 4 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal, and annul Article 3(2) and the final indent of Article 1 of the Commission Decision (1) of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.31550 implemented by Germany for Nurburgring (with a corrigendum of 13 April 2015); |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside points 3 and 4 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal, and annul Article 3(2) and the final indent of Article 1 of the Commission Decision (1) of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.31550 implemented by Germany for Nurburgring (with a corrigendum of 13 April 2015);

| — | in the alternative, set aside points 3 and 4 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal and refer the case back to the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, set aside points 3 and 4 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal and refer the case back to the General Court;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal is based on two grounds of appeal:

With respect to the first contested decision the General Court erred in applying Article 263(4) TFEU since the appellant was individually concerned. The General Court misjudged that the case does not reflect the typical scenario in which competition between several suppliers of goods is affected but between bidders, which request a certain good.

With respect to the second contested decision the General Court erred in applying Articles 107(1) and 296(2) TFEU as well as Articles 4(3) and 20(2) of the procedural Regulation No (EU) 659/1999 (2) and the principle of a diligent and impartial investigation.

---

(1)  Commission Decision (EU) 2016/151 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.31550 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for Nürburgring (notified under document C(2014) 3634) (OJ 2016, L 34, p. 1).

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ 1999, L 83, p. 1).

---
Order filed, January 10, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 01157

- CV

____________ CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellant

V.

LITTLE NELL APARTMEN TS, L.P., ET AL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 09885



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due December 27, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with t he court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cynthia Berry , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
S. Con. Res. 38 Agreed to March 30, 2012

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from 

Thursday, March 29, 2012, through Sunday, April 1, 2012, on 

a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 

Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned 

until 12:00 noon on Monday, April 16, 2012, or such other time 

on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his 

designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time 

of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns 

on any legislative day through Friday, April 13, 2012, on a motion 

offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its majority leader 

or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, April 

16, 2012, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 

2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 

SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker 

of the House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 

consultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the 

Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the 

Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble at such place and 

time as they may designate if, in their opinion, the public interest 

shall warrant it. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer and Director of New
Jersey Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2009

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCHFred W. Brackebusch,
President, Treasurer & Director

---
# C_2019220EN.01002501.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 29 April 2019 — Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v SIA ‘Hydro Energo’

(Case C-340/19)

(2019/C 220/31)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: SIA ‘Hydro Energo’

Question referred

Must the Combined Nomenclature, as set out in Annex I of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (1) amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 of 27 September 2011, (2) be interpreted as meaning that heading 7407 (Copper bars, rods and profiles) includes copper or copper alloy ingots in a rectangular shape, the thickness of which exceeds one-tenth of the width and which are hot-rolled, but which have irregular pores, holes and cracks in their cross-section?

---

(1)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2011 L 282, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-22-2021]

On March 17, 2021, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Lockheed Martin Space submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 123G, in Littleton, Colorado.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 15642, March 24, 2021). On July 15, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: July 15, 2021.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-15417 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             420
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      985
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (40)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,490
<PP&E>                                             779
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (545)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       (121)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,876
<SALES>                                          2,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,509
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     99
<INCOME-TAX>                                        94
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
# C_2019172EN.01002101.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 15 March 2019 — Blackrock Investment Management (UK) Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

(Case C-231/19)

(2019/C 172/24)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Blackrock Investment Management (UK) Limited

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Question referred

On the proper interpretation of Article 135.1(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1), where a single supply of management services within the meaning of that Article is made by a third-party provider to a fund manager and is used by that fund manager both in the management of special investment funds (‘SIFs’) and in the management of other funds that are not special investment funds (‘non-SIFs’):

| (a) | Is that single supply to be subject to a single rate of tax? If so, how is that single rate to be determined? or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Is that single supply to be subject to a single rate of tax? If so, how is that single rate to be determined? or

| (b) | Is the consideration for that single supply to be apportioned in accordance with the use of the management services (for example, by reference to the amounts of the funds under management in the SIFs and non-SIPs respectively) so as to treat part of the single supply as exempt and part as taxable? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Is the consideration for that single supply to be apportioned in accordance with the use of the management services (for example, by reference to the amounts of the funds under management in the SIFs and non-SIPs respectively) so as to treat part of the single supply as exempt and part as taxable?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006, L 347, p. 1).

---
41380 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD 

49 CFR Ch. X 

[STB Ex Parte No. 536 (Sub-No. 50)] 

Semiannual Regulatory Agenda 

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. 

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda. 

SUMMARY: The Chairman of the Surface 

Transportation Board is publishing the 

Regulatory Flexibility Agenda for spring 

2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A 

contact person is identified for each of 

the rules listed below. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq., sets forth several 

requirements for agency rulemaking. 

Among other things, the RFA requires 

that, semiannually, each agency shall 

publish in the Federal Register a 

Regulatory Flexibility Agenda, which 

shall contain: 

(1) A brief description of the subject 

area of any rule that the agency expects 

to propose or promulgate, which is 

likely to have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities; 

(2) A summary of the nature of any 

such rule under consideration for each 

subject area listed in the agenda 

pursuant to paragraph (1), the objectives 

and legal basis for the issuance of the 

rule, and an approximate schedule for 

completing action on any rule for which 

the agency has issued a general notice 

of proposed rulemaking; and 

(3) The name and telephone number 

of an agency official knowledgeable 

about the items listed in paragraph (1). 

Accordingly, a list of proceedings 

appears below containing information 

about subject areas in which the Board 

is currently conducting rulemaking 

proceedings or may institute such 

proceedings in the near future. It also 

contains information about existing 

regulations being reviewed to determine 

whether to propose modifications 

through rulemaking. 

The agenda represents the Chairman’s 

best estimate of rules that may be 

considered over the next 12 months but 

does not necessarily reflect the views of 

any other individual Board Member. 

RIN 2140–AB29, as referenced on 

reginfo.gov. 

However, section 602(d) of the RFA, 

5 U.S.C. 602(d), provides: ‘‘Nothing in 

[section 602] precludes an agency from 

considering or acting on any matter not 

included in a Regulatory Flexibility 

Agenda or requires an agency to 

consider or act on any matter listed in 

such agenda.’’ 

The Chairman is publishing the 

agency’s Regulatory Flexibility Agenda 

for spring 2021 as part of the Unified 

Agenda of Federal Regulatory and 

Deregulatory Actions (Unified Agenda). 

The Unified Agenda is coordinated by 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB), pursuant to Executive Orders 

12866 and 13563. The Board is 

participating voluntarily in the program 

to assist OMB and has included 

rulemaking proceedings in the Unified 

Agenda beyond those required by the 

RFA. 

Dated: March 17, 2021. 

By the Board, Martin J. Oberman. 

Jeffrey Herzig, 

Clearance Clerk. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14889 Filed 7–29–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915–01–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS28
#### In the Matter of Edmund P. Riely, a Suspended Attorney, Petitioner.

Application by petitioner, by a suspended attorney and counselor-at-law, whose period of suspension has expired for his reinstatement to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

The matter is referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department to investigate and report (1) on whether petitioner has complied with this court’s order of suspension and (2) whether he presently possesses the character and fitness requisite to an attorney and counselor-at-law.

The petitioner’s application will be held in abeyance, pending the Committee’s report. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Parraguirre

court in the first instance.' NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

J. aitta cc: John Francis Arpino Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 19474 Apip,