alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 133 (Thursday, July 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 37397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15064]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request for Disposal of 14.1 Acres of 
Land at Auburn-Lewiston Airport, Auburn, ME

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request 
from the Cities of Auburn and Lewiston, ME to dispose of 14.1 acres of 
land at Auburn-Lewiston Airport, Auburn, ME. The land is not required 
for aeronautical use. Given its location, the disposal of land will not 
affect existing or future aviation development needs at the airport. An 
avigation easement will be placed on the property to ensure conformance 
with airport airspace requirements. The proceeds of the land sale will 
be placed in the airport's operating and maintenance account.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 16, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the instructions on providing comments.
    <bullet> Fax: 202-493-2251.
    <bullet> Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W 12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents 
by contacting the FAA at the address listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and 
Land Use Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration New England Region 
Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts 
01803. Telephone: 781-238-7618.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2).

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on July 12, 2021.
Julie Seltsam-Wilps,
Deputy Director, ANE-600.
[FR Doc. 2021-15064 Filed 7-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

Optical CableCorporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement No. 33-09433 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-103108 on Form S-3 of Optical Cable Corporation of our report dated December 12, 2003, except as to note 9 to the financial statements, which is as of December 30, 2003, withrespect to the balance sheets of Optical Cable Corporation as of October 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2003,which report is incorporated by reference in the October 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Optical Cable Corporation. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Roanoke, Virginia 

January 29, 2004
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JAVAUGHN SKINKLE

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2504
LT Case No. 2021

- CF

- 101477

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed May 20, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Vol usia County

, James R. Clayton , Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

.2

In this Anders 1 appeal, we af firm Javaughn S k inkle’s judgment and

sentence with one exception. Th e trial court erred in assessing investigative

costs under section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (20 2 1), in the absence of a

request from the State

. See Richards v. State , 288 So. 3d 574, 577 (Fla.

2020) (“ [T]he State must request investigative costs to make a defendant

liable for those costs

. . . . ” (citation omitted) ). W e remand for the trial court

to enter an amended judgment without including these investigative costs

. In

all other respects, we affirm. See State v. Dortch , 317 So. 3d 1074, 1084

(Fla. 2021) (“ [T]here is no fundamental

- error exception to the preservation

requirement of rule 9.140(b)(2 )(A)(ii)(c). ”).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

LAMBERT

, C.J.

, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
#### RICHMOND v. MANDELL et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 18, 1898.)

Action by Alexander A. Richmond against Edward D. Mandell and others.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs.
# C_2019280EN.01001801.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie (Poland) lodged on 20 March 2019 — QL S.A. in B. v C.G.

(Case C-252/19)

(2019/C 280/24)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: QL S.A. in B.

Defendant: C.G.

Question referred

Must the provisions of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, (1) and in particular Article 3(g) and Article 22(1) of that directive, be interpreted as precluding the introduction into national law of the concept of ‘maximum non-interest credit costs’ and the mathematical formula for calculating those costs set out in Article 5(6)(a) in conjunction with Article 36a of the Ustawa o kredycie konsumenckim z dnia 12 maja 2011 r. (Law of 12 May 2011 on Consumer Credit, consolidated text: Journal of Laws [Dz. U.] of 2018, item 993), which allow the costs of the business activity of a seller or supplier to be included in the costs related to a credit agreement that are to be borne by the consumer (the total costs of the credit)?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2304

_____________________________
M ICHEL A DIB A BDALLAH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

. April 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRM ED

. R OWE , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

William Mallory Kent, Jacksonville
, for Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney Genera l, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 99.1


                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
                                       OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



         The undersigned hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed by Technology Flavors & Fragrances,
Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.




Dated:  March 15, 2005              /s/   Philip Rosner
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Philip Rosner
                                    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




Dated:  March 15, 2005              /s/   Joseph A. Gemmo
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Joseph A. Gemmo
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



                                       25
#### In the Matter of Ronnie M., a Person Alleged to be in Need of Supervision, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 812]

*1122In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, Ronnie M. appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Loguercio, J.), dated June 27, 2011, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, adjudged the appellant to be a person in need of supervision and directed that he be placed in the custody of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for a period of one year for placement with Hope for Youth.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the appellant, Ronnie M., was a person in need of supervision. Further, it did not err in placing the appellant in the custody of the Department of Social Services (hereinafter the DSS) for a period of one year for placement in a residential treatment facility. After finding beyond a reasonable doubt *(see*Family Ct Act § 744 [b]), after a fact-finding hearing, that the appellant had engaged in repeated acts of physically and verbally violent behavior, threats, and acts of defiance and disobedience *(see Matter of Jonathan D.,*297 AD2d 400, 401 [2002]; *Matter of Edwin G,*296 AD2d 7, 8 [2002]; *cf. Matter of Anna “AA”,*36 AD2d 1001, 1002 [1971]), the Family Court correctly determined, upon a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 745 [b]), after a dispositional hearing, that reasonable efforts had been made prior to the dispositional hearing to prevent the need for removal of the appellant from his home *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 745, 754 [2]; *Matter of Alexander C.,*83 AD3d 1058, 1059 [2011]). The Family Court also properly found, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the appellant’s needs and best interests, as well as the need for protection of the community, were best served by his placement with the DSS in residential treatment outside the home *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 745, 754 [2]; *Matter of Ashlie B.,*37 AD3d 997 [2007]; *Matter of Jeremy L.,*220 AD2d 908, 909 [1995]; *cf. Matter of Jessica PP.,*23 AD3d 953 [2005]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Eng and Roman, JJ, concur.
S e ria l: 156313 I N T H E SUPR EM E C O UR T O F M I SS I SS I PPI No . 2 0 0 8 - KP - 0 1 3 7 3 - S CT
W ELD ON FOXWOR TH
v. STATE OFM

I SS I SS I PPI OR DER ¶ 1 . T h is m a tter is b e fo re th e C o u rt o n A p p e llan t W e ld o n F o x w o rth ’s N o tice o f A p p e a l. O n the St at e’ s M ot i on t o D i s m i s s A ppeal a nd a f t erdue c ons i der at i on, thi s C our tf i nds that th e a p p e a l is u n tim e ly a n d s h o u ld b e d is m is s e d w ith o u t p re ju d ic e . ¶2. W el don Foxw or th pl eade d gui l ty and w as s ent ence d by the tr i al court on A ugus t21, 2007. H e di d notf

i l e a N ot i ce of

A ppeal w i th thi s Courtunt i l A ugus t12, 2008. R ul e 4 of
o u r R u les o f A p p e llate P ro c e d u re c lea rly sta tes , in p e rtin e n t p a rt: [ I ] n a c i vi l orc r i m i nal c as e i n w hi ch an appea l orc r os s - appea l i s perm i t t ed by l aw as of ri ghtf r om the tr i al courtt o the Supr eme C our t , the not i ce of appea l r equi r ed by R ul e 3 shal l be f i l ed w i th the cl erk of

the tr i al courtw i thi n 30 days a f t e rth e d a t e o f

e n try o f th e j u d g me n to ro r d e ra p p e a l e d f r o m. T hus , af t erdue cons i der at i on of the r ecor d and t he part i es ’ br i ef s , thi s C our tf

i nds that F o x w o rt h ’s N o tic e o f A p p e a l w a s u n tim e ly fi le d
. ¶3. I T I S, T H E R E FO R E , O R D E R E D t hatF oxw or th’ s N ot i ce of A ppeal i s unt i m el y f

i l ed
a n d h is a p p e a l is h e re b y d is m is s e d
.2

¶ 4 . IT IS F U R T H E R O R D E R E D th a t th e d is m is s a l s h a ll b e w ith o u t p reju d ice to Foxw or th, and he s hal l have l eave t o fi l e a m ot i on forpost - convi ct i on col l at er al re l i ef as a n o rig in a l civ il ac tio n in th e trial c o u rt. ¶5. SO O R D E R E D , thi s the 18 day of A ugus t , 2009. th

/ s /J es s H . D i cki ns on J ES S H. DI CKI NSON, J UST I CE
# C_2020103EN.01000902.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Osijeku (Croatia) lodged on 4 December 2019 — S.B. v Klinički bolnički centar Osijek

(Case C-889/19)

(2020/C 103/14)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Općinski sud u Osijeku

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: S.B.

Defendant: Klinički bolnički centar Osijek

By order of the Court of 6 December 2019, Case C-889/19 is removed from the register of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

---
Order filed, January 10, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01157-CV

____________

CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant

V.

LITTLE NELL APARTMENTS, L.P., ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-09885

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 27, 2012. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cynthia Berry, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Young Innovations, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                                                        |                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------
|/s/ Alfred E. Brennan, Jr.                                                              |                          
|Alfred E. Brennan, Jr., Director and
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Arthur L. Herbst, Jr. |                          
|Arthur L. Herbst, Jr.,
President                                                        |                          
|                                                                                        | /s/ Christine R. Boehning
|Christine R. Boehning,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                       |                          
|                                                                                        |                          

March 10, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Young Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Young Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CAROL ANN AGSTER, personal 

representative of the Estate of

Charles J. Agster, III, deceased,

and as surviving parent of Charles

J. Agster, III; CHARLES J. AGSTER,

JR., surviving parent of Charles J.

Agster, III,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

MARICOPA COUNTY, a public entity;

MARICOPA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL

HEALTH SERVICES, a division of

Maricopa County, No. 04-15466

Defendants-Appellants, D.C. No.  CV-02-01686-JAT and

M ORDER ARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE, a division of Maricopa

County; JOSEPH M. ARPAIO,

Sheriff; BETTY J. LEWIS; JOHN DOE

LEWIS, husband; BARUCH A.

REUSCH; JANE DOE REUSCH, wife;

LEAH R. COMPTON; JOHN DOE

COMPTON, husband; KRISTINE

KEMPER; JAMES E. CROUCH,

husband, aka John Doe Kemper;

AMANDA S. GARRISON; JOHN DOE

GARRISON, husband; SUSAN E.

FISHER; JOHN DOE FISHER, husband; 

11693
ERIC NULPH; JANE DOE NULPH, 

wife; KATHERINA BROKSCHMIDT;

CHARLES BROKSCHMIDT, husband,

aka John Doe Brokschmidt;

MICHAEL C. WILKINS; KATHLEEN 

WILKINS, wife, aka Jane Doe

Wilkins; LAURA SODEMAN; JOHN

DOE SODEMAN, husband,

Defendants. 

Filed August 29, 2005

Before: John T. Noonan, Sidney R. Thomas, and

Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed on April 28, 2005 is hereby withdrawn.

11694 AGSTER v. MARICOPA COUNTY

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2005 Thomson/West.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Douglas R. Young, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended November 1, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeoMagic
Corporation.





Date:
December 15, 2009


By:
            /s/
      Douglas R. YoungName:
            DOUGLAS
      R. YOUNGTitle:
            (Acting)
      Chief Financial Officer
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 26 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas the year of 2011 is recognized as the ‘‘International 

Year for People of African Descent’’; 

Whereas the African Diaspora is expansive, spanning the 

globe from Latin America and the Caribbean to Asia, 

with persons of African descent living on every continent, 

including Europe; 

Whereas in recognition of the African Diaspora, on December 

18, 2009, the United Nations General Assembly adopted 

Resolution 64/169, designating the year of 2011 as the 

‘‘International Year for People of African Descent’’; 

Whereas the historical bonds and shared experiences that tie 

the African continent with the world must be recalled; 

Whereas the global contributions of people of African descent 

must be recognized as a means of preserving that heritage; 

Whereas a central goal of recognizing the year of 2011 as the 

International Year for People of African descent is to 

strengthen national actions and regional and international cooperation for the benefit of people of African 

descent in relation to— 

(1) the full enjoyment of economic, cultural, social, 

civil, and political rights for people of African descent; 
2 

†SCON 26 ES 

(2) the participation and integration of people of African descent in all political, economic, social, and cultural aspects of society; and 

(3) the promotion of greater knowledge of, and respect for, the diverse heritage and culture of people of 

African descent; and 

Whereas the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, done at Helsinki August 1, 1975, 

states that ‘‘participating States will respect human 

rights and fundamental freedoms . . . for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the goals and ideals of the des4 ignation of the year of 2011 as the International 

5 Year for People of African Descent; 

6 (2) encourages the recognition and celebration 

7 of the collective history and achievements made by 

8 people of African descent; 

9 (3) reaffirms the importance of inclusion and 

10 the full and equal participation of people of African 

11 descent around the world in all aspects of political, 

12 economic, social, and cultural life; 

13 (4) recognizes bilateral and multilateral efforts 

14 to promote democracy, human rights, and rule of 

15 law, including those efforts that target the eradi16 cation of poverty, hunger, and inequality; and 
3 

†SCON 26 ES 

1 (5) reaffirms the commitment of Congress to 

2 address racism, discrimination, and intolerance in 

3 the United States and around the globe. 

Passed the Senate 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 26 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the designation 

People of African Descent. of the year of 2011 as the International Year for
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer and Director of New
Jersey Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: November 11, 2010

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCH 
  Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer & Director

---
#### RANKIN v. BUSH et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by George C. Rankin, as receiver, against John J. Bush and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, upon payment of $10 costs, and on condition that defendants have their appeal ready for argument at the December term. Order filed.