alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Bernard Schwartz, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Loral Orion,
Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b) (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. /s/
    Bernard L. SchwartzBernard L. SchwartzChief Executive Officer August 5, 2004 31
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714909
<NAME> 81I.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          58,386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,990
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,376
<PP&E>                                       9,883,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,937,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,044,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,115
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,031,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,044,443
<SALES>                                        205,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,288
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Paula Scarangello, as Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel Scarangello, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

In a wrongful death claim, claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (McCabe, J.) dated January 3,1984, which denied her motion for an order authorizing the service and filing of an amended bill of particulars.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and appellant’s motion granted.

Motions to amend or supplement a bill of particulars are governed by the same standards as those applying to motions to amend pleadings *(Kerlin v Green,*36 AD2d 892; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶3042.14a). A party may amend his *799pleadings at any time by permission of the court and leave is to be freely given (CPLR 3025 [b]; 22 NYCRR 1200.12 [b]). While a court has broad discretion in deciding whether leave to amend should be granted, it is considered an improvident exercise of discretion to deny leave to amend in the absence of an inordinate delay and a showing of prejudice to the defendant (see, *Pignataro v Balsamo,*108 AD2d 1086; *Plattsburgh Distrib. Co. v Hudson Val. Wine Co.,*108 AD2d 1043; *Cardy v Frey,*86 AD2d 968; *see also, Fahey v County of Ontario,*44 NY2d 934).

In the instant case, while there was substantial delay by the claimant in seeking the amendment of her bill of particulars, the State will not be prejudiced by such relief since it was apprised at the outset of the facts and the nature of the claim and claimant’s proposed amendment involves the same transaction and set of facts *(see, Plattsburgh Distrib. Co. v Hudson Val. Wine Co., supra,*p 1044). In addition, it is noted that contrary to the State’s position, the claimant is not seeking to add causes of action by amending her bill of particulars but rather is seeking to amplify and clarify allegations contained in her claim for damages and original bill of particulars. In view of the facts of the instant case, the court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the requested relief. Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           10619
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             137
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      55420
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           16933
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             17855
<LOANS>                                         212843
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  308705
<DEPOSITS>                                      258740
<SHORT-TERM>                                     10498
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2391
<LONG-TERM>                                       7704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          6474
<OTHER-SE>                                       22898
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  308705
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  17212
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4309
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   462
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 21983
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                9788
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10667
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            11316
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      700
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  71
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   8514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5175
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        5175
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.27
<LOANS-NON>                                        136
<LOANS-PAST>                                       790
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   147
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2322
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      368
<RECOVERIES>                                        81
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2735
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2735
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL 

P.O. 

4/15/2015 

MONROE,BRANDONJAME 

This is to advise that the Court 

file the original application· for 

$ @(Ot~,,..~ --~ 

0002003152 APR16 2015 ~~ 

MAILED FROM 7WR~S2,9'~fz-b 1 ' 

·written order motion for leave to 

· ~ / "/BRANDON JAMES MONROE 

,_ • 7 LYNN COUNTY JAIL 'J • ' ~_, , 810 LOCKWOOD S~RE~l' · · 

. \'-- ·"' TAHOKA, TX 79373 :.;;: · 

Abel Acosta, Clerk 

n ~-. tl ~~~ ~ u~, ·$---· -'. ·-'1 ~ -...:: 

. ~ "1 

~ 

. - . r 

7'3:37:3 

l II 11'/J "d I .IJ "I' ii·'I'IIIIJI!I''I' di ,1-llljJ• ill't'l·l·l·l·lt]J •J' i Ill' • .. .· fl'llml'l ." I ""I" . I "f"l rr•1•J rrh•l)\ I' 

l
exhibit-4_16.htm




 



 



Page - 1







 





 



 



Page - 2







 





 



 



Page - 3







 





 



 



Page - 4







 





 



 



Page - 5







 





 



 



Page - 6







 





 



 



Page - 7
# C_2020399EN.01003401.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Veronese Design Company v EUIPO — Veronese (VERONESE)

(Case T-608/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark VERONESE - Earlier EU word mark VERONESE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 399/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Veronese Design Company Ltd (Kowloon, Hong Kong) (represented by: B. Lafont, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Veronese SAS (Paris, France) (represented by: S. Herrburger, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 June 2019 (Case R 2434/2018-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Veronese and Veronese Design Company.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 June 2019 (Case R 2434/2018-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Veronese SAS and Veronese Design Company Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 June 2019 (Case R 2434/2018-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Veronese SAS and Veronese Design Company Ltd;

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Veronese Design Company; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Veronese Design Company;

| 3. | Orders Veronese to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Veronese to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANDRES PARRA,

Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-871

[March 26, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-16-

011363 (08).

Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for 

appellant.

Kara Rockenbach Link and Daniel M. Schwarz of Link & Rockenbach, 

PA, West Palm Beach, and Michael Balducci and William A. Sabinson of 

Kubicki Draper, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 95 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that wages earned 

and self-employment income derived by individuals while such individuals 

were not citizens or nationals of the United States and were illegally 

in the United States shall not be credited for coverage under the oldage, survivors, and disability insurance program under such title. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide 

that wages earned and self-employment income derived 

by individuals while such individuals were not citizens 

or nationals of the United States and were illegally in 

the United States shall not be credited for coverage 

under the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under such title. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 95 IS

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATIONS ON COVERAGE OF INDIVIDUALS 

2 BASED ON EARNINGS PAID OR DERIVED BY 

3 INDIVIDUALS WHILE SUCH INDIVIDUALS 

4 WERE NOT CITIZENS OR NATIONALS OF THE 

5 UNITED STATES AND WERE ILLEGALLY IN 

6 THE UNITED STATES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 215(e) of the Social Secu8 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 415(e)) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 

10 subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; 

11 (2) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(e)’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(2) For purposes of subsections (b) and (d), in com15 puting an individual’s average indexed monthly earnings, 

16 or in the case of an individual whose primary insurance 

17 amount is computed under section 215(a) as in effect 

18 prior to January 1979, average monthly wage, such indi19 vidual shall not be credited with any wages paid to such 

20 individual, or any self-employment income derived by such 

21 individual, while such individual was not a citizen or na22 tional of the United States and was illegally in the United 

23 States.’’. 

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

25 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to wages paid, and 

26 self-employment income derived, before, on, or after the 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 95 IS

1 date of the enactment of this Act. Notwithstanding section 

2 215(f)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 415(f)(1)), 

3 as soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of 

4 this Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall recom5 pute all primary insurance amounts to the extent nec6 essary to carry out such amendments. Such amendments 

7 shall affect benefits only for months after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Glen Dorch, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered June 5, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), and attempted robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence of six concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 2 Vi to 7 Vi years.

Judgment modified, on the law, by reducing the sentences imposed on each count of attempted robbery in the second degree (counts seven and eight) to indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 2V6 to 7 years, to run concurrently with the terms of imprisonment imposed on the other counts. As so modified, judgment affirmed.

The indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 2 Vi to 7 Vi years’ incarceration imposed on defendant’s conviction of counts seven and eight of the indictment, each charging defendant with attempted robbery in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 110.05 [5]) a class D violent felony *(see,*Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [c]) were illegal. The maximum term that could be imposed for this offense was 2 Vi to 7 years’ incarceration *(see,*Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [d]; [3] [b]). Other court records reflect that indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 2 Vi to 7 years were intended to be imposed by the sentencing court, and, in view of defendant’s prior criminal record, the imposition of such terms of imprisonment would not constitute an abuse of discretion. Consequently, the judgment is hereby modified to reflect the intention of the sentencing court. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #16955 and #16956; Mississippi Disaster Number MS-00135]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-4598-DR), dated 5/04/2021.

*Incident:*                         Severe Winter Storms. Incident Period: 02/11/2021 through 02/19/2021.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 07/07/2021.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         Filing Period for counties listed below ends on 09/07/2021.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         Filing Period for counties listed below ends on 04/07/2022.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Mississippi, dated 5/04/2021, is hereby amended to include the counties listed below. Please contact the SBA disaster customer service center by email at                     *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 to request an application. Applications for physical damages may be filed until 09/07/2021 and applications for economic injury may be file until 04/07/2022.                

*Primary Counties:*                     Clay, Holmes, Quitman, Webster, Wilkinson.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2021-15061 Filed 7-14-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
IIA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 12 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to give 

States the right to repeal Federal laws and regulations when ratified 

by the legislatures of two-thirds of the several States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2011 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. HATCH, Mr. RISCH, and Mr. 

CORNYN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to give States the right to repeal Federal laws 

and regulations when ratified by the legislatures of twothirds of the several States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SJ 12 IS 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘Any provision of law or regulation of the United 

5 States may be repealed by the several States, and such 

6 repeal shall be effective when the legislatures of two-thirds 

7 of the several States approve resolutions for this purpose 

8 that particularly describe the same provision or provisions 

9 of law or regulation to be repealed.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS