Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 139 / Friday, July 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 38931 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

(UMRA) 

This action does not contain any 

unfunded mandate as described in 

UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does 

not significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. This action does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. 

Accordingly, no additional costs to 

State, local, or tribal governments, or to 

the private sector, will result from this 

action. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the states, on the 

relationship between the National 

Government and the states, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination 

With Indian Tribal Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175, because this action does 

apply on any Indian reservation land or 

in any other area where the EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction, and will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

There are no areas of Indian country 

located in the West Pinal PM10

nonattainment area. Thus, Executive 

Order 13175 does not apply to this 

action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

The EPA interprets Executive Order 

13045 as applying only to those 

regulatory actions that concern 

environmental health or safety risks that 

the EPA has reason to believe may 

disproportionately affect children, per 

the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory 

action’’ in section 2–202 of the 

Executive order. This action is not 

subject to Executive Order 13045 

because it does not impose additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

state law. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211, because it is not a 

significant regulatory action under 

Executive Order 12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTAA) 

Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs 

the EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards in its regulatory activities 

unless to do so would be inconsistent 

with applicable law or otherwise 

impractical. The EPA believes that this 

action is not subject to the requirements 

of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

The EPA lacks the discretionary 

authority to address environmental 

justice in this action. 

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) 

This action is subject to the CRA, and 

the EPA will submit a rule report to 

each House of the Congress and to the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ 

as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

L. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by September 21, 

2021. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this rule for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 8, 2021. 

Elizabeth Adams, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15667 Filed 7–22–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0221; FRL–8761–02– 

R4] 

Air Plan Approval; Tennessee; 

Knoxville Area Limited Maintenance 

Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone 

NAAQS 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve a state implementation plan 

(SIP) revision submitted by the State of 

Tennessee, through the Tennessee 

Department of Environment and 

Conservation (TDEC), Air Pollution 

Control Division, via a letter dated 

January 23, 2020. The SIP revision 

includes the 1997 8-hour ozone national 

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) 

Limited Maintenance Plan (LMP) for the 

Knoxville, Tennessee Area (hereinafter 

referred to as the ‘‘Knoxville Area’’ or 

‘‘Area’’). The Knoxville Area, as defined 

in this action, is comprised of Jefferson, 

Loudon, and Sevier Counties in their 

entireties, the portion of Cocke County 

that falls within the boundary of the 

Great Smoky Mountains National Park, 

and a portion of Anderson County that 

excludes the area surrounding 

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Bull 

Run Fossil Plant. EPA is approving the 

Knoxville Area LMP because it provides 

for the maintenance of the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS within the Knoxville 

Area through the end of the second 10- 

year portion of the maintenance period. 

The effect of this action is to make 

certain commitments related to 

maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS in the Knoxville Area federally 

enforceable as part of the Tennessee SIP. 

DATES: This rule is effective August 23, 

2021. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0221. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the www.regulations.gov website. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials can either be retrieved 

electronically via www.regulations.gov 

or in hard copy at the Air Regulatory 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
38932 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 139 / Friday, July 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

1 In March 2008, EPA completed another review 

of the primary and secondary ozone NAAQS and 

tightened them further by lowering the level for 

both to 0.075 ppm. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 

2008). Additionally, in October 2015, EPA 

completed a review of the primary and secondary 

ozone NAAQS and tightened them by lowering the 

level for both to 0.070 ppm. See 80 FR 65292 

(October 26, 2015). 

2See 77 FR 30088. 3The ‘‘Knoxville 1997 NAAQS Area’’ 

encompasses both the ‘‘Knoxville Area’’ and the 

‘‘Knoxville 2008 NAAQS Area’’. 4See 82 FR 54232 (November 16, 2017). 5Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA sets out the 

requirements for redesignating a nonattainment area 

to attainment. They include attainment of the 

NAAQS, full approval of the applicable SIP 

pursuant to CAA section 110(k), determination that 

improvement in air quality is a result of permanent 

and enforceable reductions in emissions, 

demonstration that the state has met all applicable 

section 110 and part D requirements, and a fully 

approved maintenance plan under CAA section 

175A. 

6 John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality 

Management Division, EPA Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards (OAQPS), ‘‘Procedures for 

Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to 

Attainment,’’ September 4, 1992 (Calcagni memo). 7The ozone design value for a monitoring site is 

the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily 

maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations. 

The design value for an ozone area is the highest 

design value of any monitoring site in the area. 8See ‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan Option for 

Nonclassifiable Ozone Nonattainment Areas’’ from 

Sally L. Shaver, OAQPS, dated November 16, 1994; 

‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan Option for 

Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment Areas’’ from 

Joseph Paisie, OAQPS, dated October 6, 1995; and 

‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Moderate 

PM10 Nonattainment Areas’’ from Lydia Wegman, 

OAQPS, dated August 9, 2001. Copies of these 

guidance memoranda can be found in the docket for 

this proposed rulemaking. 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air and 

Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 

Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

EPA requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sarah LaRocca, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air and 

Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 

Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

The telephone number is (404) 562– 

8994. Ms. LaRocca can also be reached 

via electronic mail at larocca.sara@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

In 1979, under section 109 of the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), EPA 

established primary and secondary 

NAAQS for ozone at 0.12 parts per 

million (ppm), averaged over a 1-hour 

period. See 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 

1979). On July 18, 1997, EPA revised the 

primary and secondary NAAQS for 

ozone to set the acceptable level of 

ozone in the ambient air at 0.08 ppm, 

averaged over an 8-hour period. See 62 

FR 38856 (July 18, 1997).1 EPA set the 

8-hour ozone NAAQS based on 

scientific evidence demonstrating that 

ozone causes adverse health effects at 

lower concentrations and over longer 

periods of time than was understood 

when the pre-existing 1-hour ozone 

NAAQS was set. EPA determined that 

the 8-hour ozone NAAQS would be 

more protective of human health, 

especially children and adults who are 

active outdoors, and individuals with a 

pre-existing respiratory disease, such as 

asthma. 

Following promulgation of a new or 

revised NAAQS, EPA is required by the 

CAA to designate areas throughout the 

nation as attaining or not attaining the 

NAAQS. On April 15, 2004, EPA 

designated the Knoxville 1997 NAAQS 

Area, which is comprised of Anderson, 

Blount, Knox, Jefferson, Loudon, and 

Sevier Counties in their entireties, and 

the portion of Cocke County that falls 

within the boundary of the Great Smoky 

Mountains National Park, as 

nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS, and the designation 

became effective on June 15, 2004. See 

69 FR 23858 (April 30, 2004). Similarly, 

on May 21, 2012, EPA designated areas 

as unclassifiable/attainment or 

nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. EPA designated Blount 

and Knox Counties and the portion of 

Anderson County surrounding the TVA 

Bull Run Fossil Plant as nonattainment 

for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and 

classified as a marginal nonattainment 

area (hereinafter referred to as the 

‘‘Knoxville 2008 NAAQS Area’’). This 

designation became effective on July 20, 

2012.2 In addition, on November 16, 

2017, areas were designated for the 2015 

8-hour ozone NAAQS. The Knoxville 

1997 NAAQS Area 3 was designated 

attainment/unclassifiable for the 2015 8- 

hour ozone NAAQS, with an effective 

date of January 16, 2018.4

A state may submit a request to 

redesignate a nonattainment area that is 

attaining a NAAQS to attainment, and, 

if the area has met other required 

criteria described in section 107(d)(3)(E) 

of the CAA, EPA may approve the 

redesignation request.5 One of the 

criteria for redesignation is to have an 

approved maintenance plan under CAA 

section 175A. The maintenance plan 

must demonstrate that the area will 

continue to maintain the NAAQS for the 

period extending ten years after 

redesignation, and it must contain such 

additional measures as necessary to 

ensure maintenance and such 

contingency provisions as necessary to 

assure that violations of the NAAQS 

will be promptly corrected. Eight years 

after the effective date of redesignation, 

the state must also submit a second 

maintenance plan to ensure ongoing 

maintenance of the NAAQS for an 

additional ten years pursuant to CAA 

section 175A(b) (i.e., ensuring 

maintenance for 20 years after 

redesignation). 

EPA has published long-standing 

guidance for states on developing 

maintenance plans.6 The Calcagni 

memo provides that states may 

generally demonstrate maintenance by 

either performing air quality modeling 

to show that the future mix of sources 

and emission rates will not cause a 

violation of the NAAQS or by showing 

that projected future emissions of a 

pollutant and its precursors will not 

exceed the level of emissions during a 

year when the area was attaining the 

NAAQS (i.e., attainment year 

inventory). See Calcagni memo at page 

9. EPA clarified in three subsequent 

guidance memos that certain areas 

could meet the CAA section 175A 

requirement to provide for maintenance 

by showing that the area was unlikely 

to violate the NAAQS in the future, 

using information such as the area’s 

design value 7 being significantly below 

the standard and the area having a 

historically stable design value.8 EPA 

refers to a maintenance plan containing 

this streamlined demonstration as an 

LMP. 

EPA has interpreted CAA section 

175A as permitting the LMP option 

because section 175A of the Act does 

not define how areas may demonstrate 

maintenance, and in EPA’s experience 

implementing the various NAAQS, 

areas that qualify for an LMP and have 

approved LMPs have rarely, if ever, 

experienced subsequent violations of 

the NAAQS. As noted in the LMP 

guidance memoranda, states seeking an 

LMP must still submit the other 

maintenance plan elements outlined in 

the Calcagni memo, including: An 

attainment emissions inventory, 

provisions for the continued operation 

of the ambient air quality monitoring 

network, verification of continued 

attainment, and a contingency plan in 

the event of a future violation of the 

NAAQS. Moreover, a state seeking an 

LMP must still submit its section 175A 

maintenance plan as a revision to its 

SIP, with all attendant notice and 

comment procedures. While the LMP 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 139 / Friday, July 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 38933 

9The prior memos addressed: Unclassifiable 

areas under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, 

nonattainment areas for the PM10 (particulate matter 

with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 

microns) NAAQS, and nonattainment for the carbon 

monoxide (CO) NAAQS. 

10See, e.g., 79 FR 41900 (July 18, 2014) (approval 

of the second ten-year LMP for the Grant County 

1971 SO2 maintenance area). 

guidance memoranda were originally 

written with respect to certain NAAQS,9

EPA has extended the LMP 

interpretation of section 175A to other 

NAAQS and pollutants not specifically 

covered by the previous guidance 

memos.10

In a notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM) published on June 11, 2021 (86 

FR 31218), EPA proposed to approve 

Tennessee’s LMP because the State 

made a showing, consistent with EPA’s 

prior LMP guidance, that the Area’s 

ozone concentrations are well below the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and have 

been historically stable and that it met 

the other maintenance plan 

requirements. The details of Tennessee’s 

submission and the rationale for EPA’s 

action are explained in the proposed 

rulemaking. Comments on the June 11, 

2021, NPRM were due on or before July 

12, 2021. EPA did not receive any 

comments on the June 11, 2021, NPRM. 

II. Final Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

the Knoxville Area LMP for the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS, submitted by 

TDEC on January 23, 2021, as a revision 

to the Tennessee SIP. EPA is approving 

the Knoxville Area LMP because it 

includes a sufficient update of the 

various elements of the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS Maintenance Plan 

approved by EPA for the first 10-year 

portion of the maintenance period 

(including emissions inventory, 

assurance of adequate monitoring and 

verification of continued attainment, 

and contingency provisions) and retains 

the relevant provisions of the SIP under 

sections 110(k) and 175A of the CAA. 

EPA also finds that the Knoxville 

Area qualifies for the LMP option and 

that the Knoxville Area LMP is 

sufficient to provide for maintenance of 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the 

Knoxville Area over the second 10-year 

maintenance period (i.e., through 2031). 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. This action merely approves 

state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), nor will it impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by September 21, 2021. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: July 15, 2021. 

John Blevins, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 

as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. In § 52.2220, amend the table in 

paragraph (e) by adding, at the end of 

the table, the entry ‘‘1997 8-Hour Ozone 

Second 10-Year Limited Maintenance 

Plan for the Knoxville, Tennessee Area’’ 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.2220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
38934 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 139 / Friday, July 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED TENNESSEE NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of non-regulatory 

SIP provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

1997 8-Hour Ozone Second 10-Year Limited 

Maintenance Plan for 

the Knoxville, Tennessee Area.

Jefferson, Loudon, and Sevier Counties in their 

entireties, the portion of Cocke County that 

falls within the boundary of the Great Smoky 

Mountains National Park, and a portion of Anderson County that excludes the area surrounding Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) 

Bull Run Fossil Plant.

1/8/2020 7/23/2021, [Insert citation of publication].

[FR Doc. 2021–15535 Filed 7–22–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 21–151; RM–11898; DA 21– 

767; FR ID 36877] 

Television Broadcasting Services 

Eugene, Oregon 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: On April 14, 2021, the Media 

Bureau, Video Division (Bureau) issued 

a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

(NPRM) in response to a petition for 

rulemaking filed by Sinclair Eugene 

Licensee, LLC (Petitioner), the licensee 

of KVAL–TV, channel 13 (CBS), Eugene, 

Oregon, requesting the substitution of 

channel 28 for channel 13 at Eugene in 

the DTV Table of Allotments. For the 

reasons set forth in the Report and 

Order referenced below, the Bureau 

amends FCC regulations to substitute 

channel 28 for channel 13 at Eugene. 

DATES: Effective July 23, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Manley, Media Bureau, at (202) 

418–0596 or Andrew.Manley@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

proposed rule was published at 86 FR 

22126 on April 27, 2021. The Petitioner 

filed comments in support of the 

petition reaffirming its commitment to 

apply for channel 28. No other 

comments were filed. The Petitioner 

states that VHF channels have certain 

propagation characteristics which may 

cause reception issues for some viewers. 

In addition, KVAL has received 

numerous complaints from viewers 

unable to receive the Station’s over-theair signal, despite being able to receive 

signals from other stations. The 

Petitioner also demonstrated that while 

the noise limited contour of the 

proposed channel 28 facility does not 

completely encompass the licensed 

channel 13 contour, KVAL is a CBS 

affiliate and there are three other CBS 

affiliated stations that, together, overlap 

all areas where the channel 28 noise 

limited contour does not extend beyond 

the channel 13 noise limited contour, 

except in a small geographic area with 

no population. Thus, there is no loss of 

CBS network service. 

This is a synopsis of the 

Commission’s Report and Order, MB 

Docket No. 21–151; RM–11898; DA 21– 

767, adopted July 2, 2021, and released 

July 2, 2021. The full text of this 

document is available for download at 

https://www.fcc.gov/edocs. To request 

materials in accessible formats for 

people with disabilities (braille, large 

print, electronic files, audio format), 

send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call 

the Consumer & Governmental Affairs 

Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202– 

418–0432 (tty). 

This document does not contain 

information collection requirements 

subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

proposed information collection burden 

‘‘for small business concerns with fewer 

than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601– 

612, do not apply to this proceeding. 

The Commission will send a copy of 

this Report and Order in a report to be 

sent to Congress and the Government 

Accountability Office pursuant to the 

Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 

801(a)(1)(A). 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Television. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Thomas Horan, 

Chief of Staff, Media Bureau. 

Final Rule 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as 

follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, 

307, 309, 310, 334, 336, 339. 

■ 2. In § 73.622(i), amend the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments, 

under Oregon, by revising the entry for 

Eugene to read as follows: 

§ 73.622 Digital television table of 

allotments. 

* * * * * 

(i) * * * 

Community Channel No. 

* * * * * 

OREGON 

* * * * * 

Eugene ................................... 9, 17, 28, 

* 29, 31. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2021–15691 Filed 7–22–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES