alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 21.2

                  Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures of Registrant
             TB Wood's Corporation, Subsidiaries, and Joint Ventures
                                December 31, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>          <C>      <C>      <C>             <C>
Registrant:       TB Wood's Corporation
                  Delaware

         Subsidiary:       TB Wood's Incorporated
                           Pennsylvania
                  Subsidiaries:             Plant Engineering Consultants, Incorporated
                                            Tennessee

                                            T. B. Wood's Canada Ltd.
                                            Canada

                                            TB Wood's Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
                                            Mexico

                                            Berges electronic GmbH
                                            Germany

                                            Berges electronic, S.r.l.
                                            Italy

                                            TB Wood's (Deutschland) GmbH
                                            Germany

                                            TB Wood's Foreign Investment Company
                                            Delaware

                                            TB Wood's Foreign Sales Corporation
                                            Delaware
                  Joint Ventures

                                            TB Wood's (India) Private Ltd.
                                            India

                                            TBWE Belt Drive Components LP
                                            Pennsylvania

                                            TBWE Belt Drive Systems LLC
                                            Pennsylvania
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Louis E. PrezeauLouis E. PrezeauChief Executive Officer
and President CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Edward R. WrightEdward R. WrightChief Financial Officer
and Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schdeule contains summary information extracted from the Quintel
Entertainment, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statement as
presented in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,063,717
<SECURITIES>                                24,730,706
<RECEIVABLES>                               46,310,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            95,460,377
<PP&E>                                       1,257,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                 215,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             115,998,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       51,785,689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,649
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,687,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               115,998,775
<SALES>                                    191,374,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           191,374,936
<CGS>                                      149,821,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              149,821,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,880,769
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             24,433,397
<INCOME-TAX>                                10,069,616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         22,672,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,363,781
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.76
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36708-36709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14783]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB221]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
meet with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission's (ASMFC) 
Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Management Board.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday August 4, 2021, from 10:15 
a.m. to 12:15 p.m. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Details on the 
proposed agenda, webinar listen-in access, and any meeting materials 
will be posted at www.mafmc.org/meetings.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During this meeting, the Council and the 
ASMFC's Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Management Board will 
reconsider revisions to the commercial black sea bass state allocations 
previously approved through the Council's Black Sea Bass Commercial 
State Allocation Amendment and the Commission's Addendum XXXIII. 
Background materials will be posted to www.mafmc.org/meetings.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 
those issues may not be the subject of formal action during these 
meetings. Actions

[[Page 36709]]

will be restricted to those issues specifically identified in this 
notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that 
require emergency action under Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens 
Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's intent to 
take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Kathy Collins at the Council Office, (302) 526-
5253, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: July 7, 2021.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-14783 Filed 7-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
**Exhibit 31.2****Section 302 Certification**I, Mary T. Minch, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Renaissance Learning, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as definedin Exchange Act Rules
# C_2019280EN.01002501.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/25

---

Appeal brought on 24 May 2019 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 20 March 2019 in Case T-237/17, Spain v Commission

(Case C-406/19 P)

(2019/C 280/33)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and J. Aquilina, acting as agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should set aside point 1 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal and dismiss the action at first instance or, alternatively, refer the case back to the General Court.

Single ground of appeal

The General Court erred in law in its allocation of the burden of proof in the context of the application of flat-rate corrections pursuant to Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008. (1)

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549.

---
**Exhibit 31.3**
I, Mark Smith, Chairman of Town Sports International, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Town SportsInternational, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(a) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared; and
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the designor operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting;     Date: August 16, 2004 By: /s/ Mark Smith     Mark Smith
#### Beatrice Skala, Appellant, v Frank Skala, Respondent.

— In an action for divorce, the plaintiff wife appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), entered April 19,1985, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant husband, dismissed her complaint. Plaintiff’s notice of appeal from a clerk’s extract of the minutes of trial, filed July 5, 1983, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment entered April 19, 1985 *(see,*CPLR 5520 [c]).

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

There is ample evidence in the record to support the jury’s verdict. A judgment of divorce will not be granted in this State where the plaintiff merely shows irreconcilable differences and incompatibility between the parties *(Warguleski v Warguleski,*79 AD2d 1107; *Jorgensen v Jorgensen,*67 AD2d 902; *Denny v Denny,*65 AD2d 658, *affd*48 NY2d 915). Furthermore, the court’s instructions to the jury with respect to the elements of cruel and inhuman treatment and abandonment were proper. Where the divorce action is based upon such grounds, there is no public policy requiring the dissolution of a marriage merely because it is “dead” *(Hessen v Hessen,*33 NY2d 406; *Kennedy v Kennedy,*91 AD2d 1200). Plaintiff’s reliance upon *Gleason v Gleason*(26 NY2d 28) is misplaced. There plaintiff sought a conversion divorce, which is one instance where the Legislature clearly intended that a marriage could be terminated without proof of fault. Titone, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 USCSECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medallion Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as ofthe dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. 

By: /s/ Alvin Murstein 

Chairman and 

Chief Executive Officer 

Date: March 7, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 16 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF 
              KING KAMEHAMEHA.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on June 5, 2011, to celebrate the 
birthday of King Kamehameha.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the Senate May 10, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
       for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha.
```
Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 [Intellon Letterhead] 
 Mr. Charles Harris 
 [Address] 
 December 14, 2009 
 Re: Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Between Intellon Corporation and Charles E. Harris 
 Dear Charlie: 
 Reference is made
to the Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Between Intellon Corporation and Charles E. Harris, dated September 27, 2007 (the “Employment Agreement”). By this letter, you and Intellon Corporation agree to amend the
Employment Agreement, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, in the following particulars, as of the date hereof: 
  

	 	1.	Section 2.04 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection (ii)(y) of the Section in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


 “(y) the effective date of a Change in Control (as defined in Section 2.05 below) of the
Company,” 
  

	 	2.	Section 2.08 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following to the end of Section 2.08: 

 “Payment of the Gross-Up Amount, if any, shall be made no later than the last day of the Executive’s tax year next following the
year in which the Excise Tax is paid to the taxing authorities.” 
  

	 	3.	Section 3.01(c) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection (B) of the Section in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


 “(B) Good Reason shall not exist unless the Preliminary Notice of Good Reason shall have been given by
Executive to the Company within ninety (90) days after Executive learned of the act, failure or event which Executive alleges constitutes Good Reason hereunder,” 
 In all other particulars the Employment Agreement shall remain in effect in accordance with its terms. The signature of the parties below
indicates their respective agreement to these amendments to the Employment Agreement. 
  

			
	INTELLON CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brian T. McGee

	Name:	 	Brian T. McGee
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	 /s/ Charles E. Harris

	CHARLES E. HARRIS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
             -------------------------------------------------------

                         CHASE CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST
             (formerly known as Chemical Master Credit Card Trust I)

             -------------------------------------------------------

         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of JPMorgan Chase
Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), a banking corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York ("JPMCB"), as
Servicer pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of November 15, 1999 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement")
by and among JPMCB, Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, National Association and The Bank
of New York, as trustee (the "Trustee") does hereby certify that:

         1.       JPMCB is the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
                  Agreement.

         2.       The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Pooling and
                  Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to
                  the Trustee.

         3.       This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.5 of the
                  Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         4.       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar
                  year ended December 31, 2003 was conducted under the
                  supervision of the undersigned.

         5.       Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of the
                  knowledge of the undersigned, fully performed all its
                  obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
                  throughout such period and no default in the performance of
                  such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set
                  forth in paragraph 6 below.

         6.       The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including any
                  Supplement, known to the undersigned to have been made during
                  such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each
                  such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any,
                  to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status of
                  each such default: NONE


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 30th day of March, 2004.

                                          JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,
                                          as Servicer


                                          By: /s/ Miriam K. Haimes
                                              ----------------------------------
                                          Name:  Miriam K. Haimes
                                          Title: Senior Vice President
#### Jerome Reisman, Appellant, v Iris Theodore, Respondent.

In an action to recover attorney’s fees allegedly owed, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated January 10, 1984, which denied his motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Parties to an action have the absolute right to settle, in good faith, before or after judgment and, if the settlement is reached after judgment, an attorney’s contingent fee is then based on the proceeds of the settlement *(see, Matter of Levy,*249 NY 168). There is no evidence of bad faith on defendant’s part. Since the record reveals that plaintiff has already received adequate compensation for the services rendered, the complaint was properly dismissed. O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.