alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020201EN.01002402.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/24

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — Nouryon Industrial Chemicals and Others v Commission

(Case T-868/19 R)

(Interim measures - REACH - Dimethyl ether substance - Compliance check - Commission decision - Obligation to provide certain information requiring testing on animals - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2020/C 201/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Nouryon Industrial Chemicals BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands), Knoell NL BV (Maarssen, Netherlands), Grillo-Werke AG (Duisburg, Germany), PCC Trade & Services GmbH (Duisburg) (represented by: R. Cana and G. David, lawyers, and Z. Romata, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lindenthal and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, the suspension of operation of Commission Implementing Decision C(2019) 7336 final of 16 October 2019 on the compliance check of a registration of dimethyl ether referred by the European Chemicals Agency to the Commission pursuant to Article 51(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1, corrigendum OJ 2007 L 136, p. 3), and, secondly, the grant of any other interim measures which the Court considers appropriate.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2020262EN.01002601.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/26

---

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2020 — etc-gaming and Casino-Equipment v Commission

(Case T-803/19) (1)

(Action for damages - Failure by the European Union to introduce an effective remedy offering suitable redress for a failure on the part of the national courts to submit a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 262/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: etc-gaming GmbH (Vienna, Austria) and Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH (Vienna) (represented by A. Schuster, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by L. Armati, G. Braun and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicants claim to have suffered as a result of the failure by the European Union to introduce an effective remedy offering suitable redress for a failure on the part of the national courts to submit a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice.

Operative part

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | etc-gaming GmbH and Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

etc-gaming GmbH and Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT P. DELISIO , Appellant,

v.

ESTATE OF ROBERT L. DELISIO , as beneficiary

a nd the putative P ersonal R epresentative,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 1207

[ May 16, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Charles E. Burton , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2021

- CP

001897

- XXXX

- SB

.

Brian Christopher Valentine and Rae Lynn Mosier of The Law Office of Mosier Valentine, P.A., Fort Laude rdale, for appellant.

Gary A. Woodfield and Terry E. Resk of Nason, Yeager, Gerson, Harris & Fumero, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

M AY , D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2019328EN.01005802.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/58

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — CE v Committee of the Regions

(Case T-355/19 R)

(Interim relief - Civil service - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

(2019/C 328/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions (represented by: J.C. Cañoto Argüelles, M. Esparrago Arzadun and S. Bachotet, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, suspension of the operation of, primarily, the decision of the Committee of the Regions of 17 April 2019 terminating the applicant’s contract, and, in the alternative, the letter of the Committee of the Regions of 16 May 2019 concerning the conditions relating to the notice period, and, secondly, the adoption of interim measures relating to the terms of the notice period.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                                    1,435       
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             6,986       
<ALLOWANCES>                                737       
<INVENTORY>                               8,465       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         17,249       
<PP&E>                                   13,563       
<DEPRECIATION>                            6,715       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           34,808       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     6,048       
<BONDS>                                   3,222       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    25,560       
<PREFERRED>                                   0       
<COMMON>                                     10       
<OTHER-SE>                                 (471)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             34,808       
<SALES>                                   4,702       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          5,198       
<CGS>                                     2,835       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             4,186       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              5       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           98       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,926)      
<INCOME-TAX>                                 21       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,947)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0       
<CHANGES>                                     0       
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,947)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.23)      
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.23)     
<FN>
Amounts inapplcable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Statement of
Financial Position or Results of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 40 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 40

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rules submitted by the Department of the 
  Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service relating to the reporting 
requirements for interest that relates to deposits maintained at United 
States offices of certain financial institutions and is paid to certain 
                     nonresident alien individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2012

   Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Nelson of 
  Florida, Mr. Paul, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Blunt, and Mr. Lee) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rules submitted by the Department of the 
  Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service relating to the reporting 
requirements for interest that relates to deposits maintained at United 
States offices of certain financial institutions and is paid to certain 
                     nonresident alien individuals.

Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue 
Service relating to the reporting requirements for interest that 
relates to deposits maintained at United States offices of certain 
financial institutions and is paid to certain nonresident alien 
individuals (published at 77 Fed. Reg. 23391 (April 19, 2012)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                        CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                       Three Months         Three Months           Six Months            Six Months
                                          Ended                 Ended                 Ended                 Ended
                                       December 31,          December 31,          December 31,          December 31,
                                           1996                  1997                   1996                 1997
                                     -----------------    ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
<S>                                        <C>                   <C>                   <C>                   <C>       
Net earnings before income taxes           $1,200,878            $1,749,654            $1,928,745            $3,123,572

Provision for income taxes                                          731,098                                   1,280,665
                                                          ------------------                          ------------------

Net earnings                                                     $1,018,556                                  $1,842,907
                                                          ==================                          ==================

Pro forma income taxes                        480,351                                     771,498
                                     -----------------                          ------------------

Pro forma net earnings                       $720,527                                  $1,157,247
                                     =================                          ==================

Weighted average shares
  outstanding during the period             7,000,000             9,620,084             7,000,000             9,620,084

Shares issuable under
  consulting agreement                         96,366                                      96,366

Shares issuable under
  compensation agreement                      170,708                                     170,708

                                     -----------------    ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
Weighted average common
  and common equivalent
  shares outstanding during the             7,267,074             9,620,084             7,267,074             9,620,084
  period
                                     =================    ==================    ==================    ==================

Pro forma or basic earnings per                 $0.10                 $0.11                 $0.16                 $0.19
share
                                     =================    ==================    ==================    ==================
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamil Hamdam, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 880] —

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garnett, J.), imposed May 22, 2009, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

*903Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Eng, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
# C_2022084EN.01003501.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Oltchim v Commission

(Case T-565/19) (1)

(State aid - Measures taken by Romania to support a petrochemical company - Non-enforcement, accumulation and cancellation of public claims - Action for annulment - Period within which proceedings must be brought - Point from which time starts to run - Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Interest in bringing proceedings - Existence of one or more measures - State resources - Imputability to the State - Applicability of the private creditor test - Application of the private creditor test - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 84/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Oltchim SA (Râmnicu Vâlcea, Romania) (represented by: C. Arhold, L.-A. Bondoc, S.-E. Petrisor and K. Struckmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1144 of 17 December 2018 on State aid SA.36086 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Romania for Oltchim (OJ 2019 L 181, p. 13).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 1(a) and (c) of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1144 of 17 December 2018 on State aid SA.36086 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Romania for Oltchim SA; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 1(a) and (c) of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1144 of 17 December 2018 on State aid SA.36086 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Romania for Oltchim SA;

| 2. | Annuls Articles 3 to 6 and Article 7(2) of Decision 2019/1144 in so far as they concern the measures referred to in Article 1(a) and (c) of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Articles 3 to 6 and Article 7(2) of Decision 2019/1144 in so far as they concern the measures referred to in Article 1(a) and (c) of that decision;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders Oltchim to bear one quarter of its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Oltchim to bear one quarter of its own costs;

| 5. | Orders the European Commission to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by Oltchim and to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the European Commission to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by Oltchim and to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Louis Prichard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                              ___/s/ Louis Prichard_______
                              Chief Executive Officer

                              March 24, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Kentucky
Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



96
# C_2021471EN.01004002.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — AZ v Commission

(Case T-196/19) (1)

(State aid - Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers - Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid - Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Admissibility - Concept of aid - State resources - Selectivity - Equal treatment - Legitimate expectations)

(2021/C 471/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: AZ (represented by: F. Wagner, D. Fouquet, T. Hartmann and M. Kachel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents, and G. Quardt and C. von Donat, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller, R. Kanitz, S. Heimerl and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/56 of 28 May 2018 on aid scheme SA.34045 (2013/c) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 StromNEV (OJ 2019 L 14, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders AZ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders AZ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
**Exhibit** **32**




**CERTIFICATION
      UNDER SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
      certifies in his capacity as an officer of ITLA Capital Corporation (the
“Company”) that this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
      ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
      (a)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
      contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
      and
      for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such
      report.




Date:
                March 16, 2007
            /s/
                George W. Haligowski
              George
                W. Haligowski
              Chairman
                of the Board,
              President
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                March 16, 2007
            /s/
                Timothy M. Doyle
              Timothy
                M. Doyle
              Executive
                Managing Director and
              Chief
                Financial Officer





This
      certification accompanies this periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
# C_2021028EN.01004302.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Brasserie St Avold v EUIPO (shape of a dark bottle)

(Case T-862/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Three-dimensional sign - Shape of a dark bottle - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 28/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Brasserie St Avold (Saint-Avold, France) (represented by: P. Greffe, D. Brun and F. Donaud, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 October 2019 (Case R 466/2019-4), concerning the international registration designating the European Union of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a dark bottle.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Brasserie St Avold to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Brasserie St Avold to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.

---
#### Frank A. Colello et al., Appellants, v Town of Kent et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from water contamination, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Beisheim, J.), dated August 19,1983, which, upon the motion of the defendants Putnam County and Putnam County Board of Health to dismiss the complaint as against them for nonjoinder of the State of New York as a necessary party, dismissed the complaint as against all defendants “without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to pursue their claim against the defendants in the Court of Claims”.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. (See, *Baisley v Town of Kent,*111 AD2d 299.) Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.