alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 45 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO 

4 AWARD THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

6 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used for an 

7 event on June 27, 2012, to award the Congressional Gold 

8 Medal, collectively, to the Montford Point Marines. 

9 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

10 conduct of the event described in subsection (a) shall be 

11 carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 

12 prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the Senate June 5, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 45 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

Montford Point Marines. Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the Capitol Visitor Center for an event to award the
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 64 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.64
                                     Agreed to December 19, 2012        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in recognition of the long and distinguished service rendered to 
the Nation by Daniel K. Inouye, a Senator from the State of Hawaii and 
formerly a Representative from that State, his remains be permitted to 
lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol on December 20, 2012, and 
the Architect of the Capitol, under the direction of the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, 
shall take all necessary steps for the accomplishment of that purpose.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,606
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,847
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,810
<PP&E>                                         569,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 650,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,516
<BONDS>                                        462,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   650,697
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               419,573
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               236,920
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,680)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,112)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,568)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (4,611)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (90.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (90.13)
        

</TABLE>
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 2 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for an event marking 

the 50th anniversary of the inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mr. KERRY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for an 

event marking the 50th anniversary of the inaugural 

address of President John F. Kennedy. 

Whereas John Fitzgerald Kennedy was elected to the United 

States House of Representatives and served from January 3, 1947, to January 3, 1953, until he was elected by 

the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to the Senate where 

he served from January 3, 1953, to December 22, 1960; 

Whereas on November 8, 1960, John Fitzgerald Kennedy 

was elected as the 35th President of the United States; 

and 

Whereas on January 20, 1961, President Kennedy was sworn 

in as President of the United States and delivered his inaugural address at 12:51pm, a speech that served as a 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 2 ATS 

clarion call to service for the Nation: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR 

4 AN EVENT HONORING PRESIDENT KENNEDY. 

5 The rotunda of the United States Capitol is author6 ized to be used on January 20, 2011, for a ceremony in 

7 honor of the 50th anniversary of the inaugural address 

8 of President John F. Kennedy. Physical preparations for 

9 the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in accord10 ance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Ar11 chitect of the Capitol. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
sino_ex10-2.htm


    Purchase
Agreement

     

    


    This
Purchase Agreement (the
“Agreement”) is made effective as of December 18, 2009 by and between
DongYing (Jiangsu) Pharmaceutical Limited Company, the 100% owned subsidiary of
Sinobiopharma, Inc. (“DongYing”), located at No.
2 Zhongtian Road, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226009, P. R. China and
Meisu Jining Secience and Technology (Nanjing) Limited Company (“ Meisu Jining”), located at
Hubing Xincun, Jiangning Economic and
Technology Development District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, P. R. China,
to transfer the right of the Approval Certificate of Clinical Trial of
Eplerenone Capsules (the “Certificate”) owned by Meisu
Jining to DongYing.

    


    In
reliance upon and in consideration of the following undertakings, the parties
agree as followings:

     

    
      	
              1.

            	
              Meisu
      Jining owns the Approval Certificate of Clinical Trial of Eplerenone
      Capsules issued by China National Food And Drug Administration, the
      certificate number is 2007L01312, DongYing, within 5 days after this
      Agreement being signed, issue 3,000,000 common shares to Meisu Jining to
      buy this Certificate.

            


    

     

     

    
 

    
      
         


      

      
        1

        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    


    
      	
              2.

            	
              Meisu
      Jining should transfer all related technical documents and materials to
      DongYing within 5 days after this Agreement being signed.

               

            


    

    
      	
              3.

            	
              After
      this Agreement become effective, DongYing has the sole ownership to the
      Certificate. Meisu Jining can not transfer this Certificate to any third
      party.

               

            


    

    
      	
              4.

            	
              If
      any dispute arises between the parties with respect to the matters covered
      by this Agreement, the lawsuit will file to the jurisdiction at the
      plaintiff’s location.

               

            


    

    
      	
              5.

            	
              This
      Agreement becomes effective when both party sign or stamp. Both parties
      have a copy of this Agreement and both copy has equal
      effectiveness.

               

            


    

    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    



    
      
         


      

      
        2

        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    


    


    


    /s/
Meisu Jining Secience and Technology (Nanjing) Ltd.

     

    Meisu
Jining Secience and Technology (Nanjing) Ltd.

     

    Date:
12/18/09

     

     

    


    /s/
DongYing (Jiangsu) Pharmaceutical Ltd.

     

    DongYing
(Jiangsu) Pharmaceutical Ltd.

    


    Date:
12/18/09

    


    


     

    
 

    


    


    



    
      
         


      

      
        3
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 89 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 89

  To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments made to 
                    vendors by Government entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Vitter (for himself, Mr. Burr, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. 
    Inhofe) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments made to 
                    vendors by Government entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Withholding Tax Relief Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF IMPOSITION OF WITHHOLDING ON CERTAIN PAYMENTS MADE TO 
              VENDORS BY GOVERNMENT ENTITIES.

    The amendment made by section 511 of the Tax Increase Prevention 
and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is repealed and the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such amendment had never been 
enacted.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     financial statements contained in the Registrant's Quarterly Report on
     Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              71,398
<SECURITIES>                                     4,932,935
<RECEIVABLES>                                      712,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                       107,803
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,537,871
<PP&E>                                             149,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                     120,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,806,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,579,614
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            76,489
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,149,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,806,008
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   261,321
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   350,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13,733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    369,044
<INCOME-TAX>                                        89,451
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                438,977
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       438,977
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .11
        


</TABLE>
#### Ricky Lynn NEWTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ken CLARK; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-15972.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed July 1, 2011.

Ricky Lynn Newton, Folsom, CA, pro se.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ricky Lynn Newton, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his dental needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the deliberate indifference claim relating to injuries inflicted by an allegedly defective piece of dental equipment because Newton failed to allege that defendants’ actions constituted anything other than negligence, malpractice, or an accident. *See Estelle v. Gamble,*429 U.S. 97, 105, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) (“An accident, although it may produce added anguish, is not on that basis alone to be characterized as wanton infliction of unnecessary pain.”); *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004) (even a “showing of medical malpractice or negligence is insufficient to establish a constitutional deprivation under the Eighth Amendment”).

The district court properly dismissed the deliberate indifference claim arising from a delay in dental treatment because Newton did not allege that he was harmed by the delay, *Shapley v. Nev. Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs,*766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir.1985) (per curiam), or that any of the named defendants were responsible for the delay, *Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (person can be liable for deliberate indifference only if he “knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health and safety”); *Ortez v. Wash. Cnty., State of Or.,*88 F.3d 804, 809 (9th Cir.1996) *483(dismissal of claims proper because the plaintiff failed to allege “specific facts linking each defendant to a § 1983 violation”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                 STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
            REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TB Wood's Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 24, 2006  /s/William T. Fejes, Jr.   President and CEO
                ------------------------
                William T. Fejes, Jr.

March 24, 2006  /s/Joseph C. Horvath    Chief Financial Officer
                --------------------
                Joseph C. Horvath

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TB Wood's Corporation and will be retained by TB Wood's Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2020061EN.01001702.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/17

---

Appeal brought on 20 September 2019 by Mr Andreas Hauzenberger against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 11 July 2019 in Case T-349/18, Andreas Hauzenberger v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-696/19 P)

(2020/C 61/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Andreas Hauzenberger (represented by: B. Bittner, Rechtsanwalt, U. Heinrich, Rechtsanwältin)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 19 December 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear his own costs.

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. Under Contract No. N40085-l l-C-723l APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59451

Kevin P. Polansky, Esq. Thomas H. Hayman, Esq.

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP Boston, MA Ronald J. Borra, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Stephen L. Bacon, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL Pursuant to the parties'joint request dated 22 September 2014, the above-referenced appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to Board Rule l8(b), unless either party or the Board acts within one year from the date ofthis Order to reinstate this appeal, the dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. Dated: 29 September 2014

Adminis rative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59451, Appeal ofSuffolk Construction Company, Inc
.. rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                  H.J. HEINZ FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     Following are the subsidiaries of H.J. Heinz Finance Company (the
"Company"), other than those which if considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary would not constitute a significant subsidiary, and the state or
country in which each subsidiary was incorporated or organized. The accounts of
each of the listed subsidiaries are a part of the Company's consolidated
financial statements.

<Table>
<Caption>
                         SUBSIDIARY                           STATE OR COUNTRY
                         ----------                           ----------------
<S>                                                           <C>
H.J. Heinz Company, L.P. ...................................      Delaware
</Table>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38518-38519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15435]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-638, OMB Control No. 3235-0690]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form SF-3

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form SF-3 (17 CFR 239.45) is a short form registration statement 
used for non-shelf issuers of asset-backed securities to register a 
public offering of their securities under the Securities Act of 1933 
(15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.). Form

[[Page 38519]]

SF-3 takes approximately 1,380 hours per response and is filed by 
approximately 71 issuers annually. The information collected is 
intended to ensure that the information required to be filed by the 
Commission permits verification of compliance with securities law 
requirements and assures the public availability of such information in 
the asset-backed securities market. We estimate that 25% of the 
1,383.21 hours per response (345.80 hours) is prepared by the issuer 
for a total annual reporting burden of 24,552 hours (345.80 hours per 
response x 71 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom, 
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, 
c/o Cynthia Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by 
sending an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5e5e7f4eaf8d4dcd9d7dacdf5c6d0d69bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="411113001e0c20282d232e39013224226f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 1, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15435 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>