alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
             --------------------------------------------

I, Herbjorn Hansson, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed this annual  report on Form 20-F of Nordic  American  Tanker
Shipping Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  Company's  other  certification  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  company,  including  its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  company's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation.

5. The Company's other certification  officer and I have disclosed,  based on my
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
company's  auditors and the audit  committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,  process,  summarize
and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2004


/s/ Herbjorn Hansson

Herbjorn Hansson
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT  99.1  -  Annual  Servicer  Statement  of  Compliance


                        Annual Statement as to Compliance
                   Officer's Certificate Relating to Servicing

                                January 21, 2004


Vanderbilt  Mortgage  and  Finance,  Inc.
500  Alcoa  Trail
Maryville,  Tennessee  37804

JPMorgan  Chase  Bank,  Trustee
4  New  York  Plaza
New  York,  New  York  10004

Re:  Annual Statement as to Compliance for Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Senior/Subordinate  Pass-Through  Certificates,  Series  2003-A:  Pooling  and
Servicing  Agreement  dated  as  of  January  25,  2003  by and among Vanderbilt
Mortgage  and  Finance,  Inc.,  as  Seller and Servicer, Clayton Homes, Inc., as
provider  of  the  Limited  Guarantee,  and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee (the
"Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement")


I,  Amber  Krupacs,  Executive  Vice  President  and Chief Financial Officer, do
hereby  certify  that  I  am  an  authorized  officer of Vanderbilt Mortgage and
Finance,  Inc.  ("Servicer"),  that  (i)  I have reviewed the activities for the
Servicer  during  the  preceding fiscal year and the performance of the Servicer
under the above referenced Pooling and Servicing Agreement which review was made
under  my  supervision  and  (ii) to the best of my knowledge, and based on such
review,  the  Servicer  has  fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing  Agreement  throughout  such  year.

Capitalized  terms  used  herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
respective  meanings  ascribed  to  such  terms  in  the  Pooling  and Servicing
Agreement.


Vanderbilt  Mortgage  and  Finance,  Inc,  as  Servicer

By:      /s/  Amber  Krupacs
        --------------------
        Amber  Krupacs
        Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer

                                      -8-
<PAGE>
# C_2021028EN.01004101.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-574/19) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Ground for invalidity - Non-compliance with requirements for protection - Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function - Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)

(2021/C 28/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: A. Odle and R. Palijama, lawyers, and J. St Ville, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: G. van den Bergh and B. Brouwer, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2019 (Case R 1002/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between, on the one hand, Mystic Products Import & Export and Koopman International and, on the other, Tinnus Enterprises.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tinnus Enterprises LLC to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Koopman International BV. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tinnus Enterprises LLC to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Koopman International BV.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.

---
#### GLABMAN v. UNION RY. CO. OF NEW YORK CITY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 29, 1907.)

Appeal—Dismissal of Complaint—Review.

Where a complaint is dismissed on plaintiff’s proof alone, he is entitled upon appeal to the benefit of all favorable inferences deducible therefrom, and it is to be taken as true.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 3, Appeal and Error § 4024.)

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Action by Morris Glabman against the Union Railway Company of New York City. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered.

Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, P. J., and LEVENTRITT and ERLANGER, JJ.

Gainsburg & Solomon, for appellant.

William E. Weaver, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff brought this action to .recover damages for personal injuries. It was tried before a jury, and at the close of the plaintiff’s case the court, upon motion of defendant’s counsel, dismissed the complaint upon the ground that the plaintiff failed to show himself free from contributory negligence.

Where the plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed upon his proof alone, he is entitled upon appeal to the benefit of all favorable inferences that can be drawn therefrom, and it is also to be taken - as true. Applying that rule, the evidence of the plaintiff was such as to require its submission to the jury upon the question of the negligence of the defendant and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
February 19, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.J.C., A CHILD, 

NO. 14-14-00998-CV 

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on September 5, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2020114EN.01000902.xml

| 6.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/9

---

Order of the General Court of 7 February 2020 — Fleximed v EUIPO — docPrice (Fleximed)

(Case T-214/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Fleximed - Earlier EU word mark mediFLEX - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 114/08)

Language of the proceedings: German

Parties

Applicant: Fleximed AG (Triesen, Liechtenstein) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: docPrice GmbH (Koblenz, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2019 (case R 1121/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between docPrice and Fleximed.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Fleximed AG is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Fleximed AG is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019

---
# C_2019139EN.01010001.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/100

---

Action brought on 20 February 2019 — Ramazani Shadary v Council

(Case T-122/19)

(2019/C 139/102)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois, and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1940 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 13 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1940 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 13 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP;

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1931 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 13 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1931 of 10 December 2018, in so far as the applicant remains at No 13 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;

| — | rule that the provisions of Article 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP and Article 2b(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 1183/2005/EC are unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule that the provisions of Article 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP and Article 2b(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 1183/2005/EC are unlawful;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-103/19, Mende Omalanga v Council.

---
EXHIBIT 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CuraGen Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Frank M. Armstrong, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and David M. Wurzer, Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                                                                               
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Frank M. Armstrong, M.D.                                                                                                  
|                      |  |     |  | Frank M. Armstrong, M.D.                                                                                                      
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President (principal
executive officer of the registrant)                                         
|                      |  |    
|Dated: August 9, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ David M. Wurzer                                                                                                           
|                      |  |     |  | David M. Wurzer                                                                                                               
|                      |  |     |  | Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer of the registrant)
#### In re RODGERS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

In the matter of the application for the removal from office of John Rodgers, a justice of the peace of the town of Woodbury, Orange county, N. Y.

*No*opinion. Application referred to Mr. N. Deyo Belknap, of Newburgh, N. Y., to hear and to report to the court, with his opinion. Order signed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AHL
SERVICES, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) AT SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  161,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,920
<INVENTORY>                                      2,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,216
<PP&E>                                          50,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 533,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,663
<BONDS>                                        216,417
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                     216,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   533,459
<SALES>                                        577,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               577,554
<CGS>                                          401,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  401,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   548
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,430
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,751
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,751
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95


</TABLE>
No. 01-14-00620-CR

In the 

Court of Appeals 

For the 

First District of Texas 

At Houston 



No. 1394253

In the 176th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 



BRODRICK RENALDA FRENCH 

Appellant 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee 



STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

IN WHICH TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

 COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules 10.5(b)(1) and 

38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this motion for extension of 

time in which to file the State’s brief in this case, and, in support thereof, presents the 

following: 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00620-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/1/2015 3:29:30 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/1/2015 3:29:30 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
1. In the 176th District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 1394253, the

Appellant was convicted on July 15, 2014, in The State of Texas v. Brodrick Renalda 

French.

2. For the offense of robbery, his punishment was assessed at twenty-seven years in 

prison.

3. A written notice of appeal was timely filed on July 15, 2014.

4. Appellant’s brief was filed with this Court on February 19, 2015.

5. The State’s brief was due to be filed with this Court on March 23, 2015.

6. An extension of time in which to file the State’s brief is requested until April 2, 

2015.

7. No previous extensions have been granted to the State.

8. The facts relied upon to explain the need for this extension are:

The State’s brief in this case has been prepared by an appellate intern, who has 

also been attending law school during this same time period. Therefore, 

additional time has been necessary in order to prepare the State’s brief.
WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an extension of time until 

April 2, 2015, in which to file the State’s brief in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Alan Curry

ALAN CURRY

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

TBC No. 05263700

curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been mailed to the 

appellant’s attorney at the following addresses on April 1, 2015:

David Garza

Attorney at Law

102 South Lockwood

Houston, Texas 77011

/s/ Alan Curry

ALAN CURRY

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

TBC No. 05263700

curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

Date: April 1, 2015
Order entered September 17 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00913
- CV SHEIK TEHUTI, Appellant
V. ATMOS ENERGY CORP, Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 12135 

### O RDER The clerk’s record in this case is incomplete. Specifically, the clerk’s record does not include the answer of Sheik Tehuti filed on February 7, 2014. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Gary Fitzsimmons, District Clerk of Dallas C ounty, Texas, to file within five days of the date of this order a supplemental clerk’s record including the answer of Sheik Tehuti. The Court directs the Clerk to transmit this order electronically to Gary Fitzsimmons, District Clerk and all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1








Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, the undersigned officer of AHL Services, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: November 14, 2002





Name:

/s/    A. CLAYTON PERFALLTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

## Record of Vote of Meeting Closure

(Public Law 94-409) (5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b)

I, Patricia K. Cushwa, Acting Chairman of the United States Parole Commission, was present at a meeting of said Commission, which started at approximately 2:30 p.m., on Tuesday, July 13, 2021, at the U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, Third Floor, Washington, DC 20530. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss an original jurisdiction case pursuant to 28 CFR 2.25. and 28 CFR 2.68(i)(1) Two Commissioners were present, constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was submitted.

Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the meeting and certifications of the General Counsel that this meeting may be closed by votes of the Commissioners present were submitted to the Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted that the meeting be closed: Patricia K. Cushwa and Charles T. Massarone.

*In witness whereof,*                     I make this official record of the vote taken to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to the public.                

Patricia K. Cushwa,

Acting Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-15788 Filed 7-20-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-P