alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CORRECTED ORDER: S EPTEMBER 5, 2013

N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ JOSEPH VICK , Petitioner,

v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION , Respondent.

__________________________ 201 3-3 073

__________________________ Pe tition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. D A1221100725 -B-1.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________
P ER C URIAM

.

O R D E R
Joseph Vick moves to vacate the J ul y 16 , 2013, o r der dismissing h is petition for review a nd reinstate the pet ition , which the court also construes as a motion to accept his nonconforming informal brief. Case: 13-3073 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 09/05/2013VICK V

. TRANSPORTATION 2

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. (2) The court’ s mandate is re called, the July 16, 2013 dism is sal order is vaca t ed, and the petition for re view is rei n stated

. (3) Mr. Vick ’ s informal briefs are accepted for filing. (4) The case shall be calendared in due course.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s19 Case: 13-3073 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 09/05/2013
Exhibit
32.1

Certification
of Periodic Report

Pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned
officer of Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that,
to the undersigneds knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.                                                                     

|       |                 |  |                               
|------ | --------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: | August 10, 2009 |  |                               
|      
|       |                 |  | /s/ Terrance D. Paul          
|       |                 |  | Name: Terrance D. Paul        
|       |                 |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer

THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES
THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE
FILED BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

---
# C_2019072EN.01004201.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/42

---

Action brought on 8 January 2019 — Repsol v EUIPO (INVENTEMOS EL FUTURO)

(Case T-8/19)

(2019/C 72/54)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Repsol, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.-B. Devaureix and J. C. Erdozain López, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘INVENTEMOS EL FUTURO’ — Application for registration No 17 258 807

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2018 in Case R 1173/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2019122EN.01002701.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/27

---

Action brought on 8 February 2019 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Plásticos Hidrosolubles (green cycles)

(Case T-78/19)

(2019/C 122/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: A. Marx and K. Bonhagen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Plásticos Hidrosolubles, SL (Rafelbuñol, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark green cycles in colours blue, grey and white — European Union trade mark No 8 807 265

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 November 2018 in Case R 778/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings;

| — | order Plásticos Hidrosolubles, SL to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Plásticos Hidrosolubles, SL to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in combination with Article 10(3) and (4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in combination with Article 10(3) and (4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                        OF INVERESK RESEARCH GROUP, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    JURISDICTION OF
    NAME                                         INCORPORATION/FORMATION
    ----                                         -----------------------
<S>                                              <C>
ClinTrials Acquisition Corp Inc.                     Delaware
ClinTrials BioResearch Ltd.                          Quebec
Healthmark Limited                                   Scotland
Inveresk Clinical Research Limited                   Scotland
Inveresk Research Australia Pty Limited              Australia
Inveresk Research (Canada) Inc.                      Canada
Inveresk Research Czech Republic sro                 Czech Republic
Inveresk Research Deutschland GmbH                   Germany
Inveresk Research Group Limited                      Scotland
Inveresk Research Holdings Limited                   England & Wales
Inveresk Research Inc.                               Delaware
Inveresk Research International Limited              Scotland
Inveresk Research Israel Limited                     Israel
Inveresk Research Kentucky Inc.                      Tennessee
Inveresk Research Limited                            England & Wales
Inveresk Research (North America) Inc.               Delaware
Inveresk Research North Carolina Inc.                North Carolina
Inveresk Research SARL                               France
Inveresk Research SL                                 Spain
Inveresk Research Sp z.o.o.                          Poland
Inveresk Research SRL                                Italy
2645-2151 Quebec Inc.                                Quebec
Bio-Research Laboratories Ltd.                       Canada
</TABLE>
# C_2023045EN.01003605.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/36

---

Order of the General Court of 5 December 2022 — St Schrader Holding Company UK v Commission

(Case T-782/19) (1)

(2023/C 45/61)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.

---
September 9, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE ALEX PEREZ

NO. 14-13-01048-CR 

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion and that this decision be 

certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.



|                                 |  |                                           
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|Medallion Funding LLC            |  | New York                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Capital, Inc.          |  | Minnesota                                 
|                                 | 
|Freshstart Venture Capital Corp. |  | New York                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Bank                   |  | Utah                                      
|                                 | 
|Generation Outdoor, Inc.         |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Hamptons Holding LLC   |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Taxi Medallion Loan Trust III    |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Servicing Corp.        |  | Delaware                                  
|                                 | 
|Medallion Sports Media, Inc.     |  | Delaware
Exhibit 32.1











Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Yonglin Du, President and Chief Executive Officer of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







|                            |  | 
|--------------------------- |  | 
|By: /s/ Yonglin Du          |  | 
|Yonglin Du, President & CEO |  | 



March 27, 2007
Exhibit 11




LIVEREEL MEDIA CORPORATION
 
 CODE OF ETHICS
 
 FOR
 
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR CONTROLLER AND PERSONS PERFORMING SIMILAR FUNCTIONS
 
 General Philosophy
 
 The honesty, integrity and sound judgment of LiveReel Media Corporation (“LiveReel ” or the “Company”) Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Controller and persons performing similar functions (collectively the “Principal Officers”) is fundamental to our reputation and success.  The professional and ethical conduct of the Principal Officers is essential to the proper functioning and success of LiveReel.
 
 Applicability
 
 This Code of Ethics shall apply to LiveReel’s Principal Officers.
 
 Standards of Conduct
 
 To the best of their knowledge and ability, the Principal Officers shall:
 
 ·
act with honesty and integrity, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
 
 ·
provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that LiveReel files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) and in other public communications made by LiveReel;
 
 ·
comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
 
 ·
promote the prompt internal reporting of violations of this Code of Ethics to LiveReel’s board of directors and outside legal counsel;
 
 ·
respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of employment;
 
 ·
maintain the skills necessary and relevant to LiveReel’s needs; and
 
 ·
proactively promote ethical and honest behavior among employees of LiveReel and its subsidiary.
 
 All Principal Officers are expected to adhere to the LiveReel Code of Ethics.  Any violation of this Code of Ethics will be subject to appropriate discipline, up to and including dismissal from the Company and prosecution under the law.  The board of directors shall have responsibility for administration of this Code of Ethics and shall have the sole and absolute discretionary authority to approve any deviation or waiver from this Code of Ethics for Principal Officers.  In the event that a waiver of, modification of and/or change to this Code of Ethics is approved and granted, then the notice of the waiver, modification, and/or change shall be disclosed as may be required by SEC rules or the rules of any exchange on which the securities of the Company are then trading.
# C_2019432EN.01005801.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/58

---

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2019 — Le Pen v Parliament

(Case T-211/19) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Member of the European Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Decision waiving parliamentary immunity - Expiry of an MEP’s mandate - No further interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 432/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-Marie Le Pen (Saint-Cloud, France) (represented by F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by N. Görlitz and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of European Parliament Decision P8_TA(2019)0136 of 12 March 2019, waiving the applicant’s parliamentary immunity.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
# C_2021278EN.01004001.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Franz Schröder v EUIPO — RDS Design (MONTANA)

(Case T-854/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark MONTANA - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion - Admission of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2021/C 278/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG (Delbrück, Germany) (represented by: L. Pechan and N. Fangmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: RDS Design ApS (Allerød, Denmark) (represented by: J. Viinberg, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 October 2019 (Case R 2393/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Franz Schröder and RDS Design.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| 3. | Orders RDS Design ApS to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders RDS Design ApS to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This  certification is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002.  This
certification  is  included  solely  for  the  purpose  of  complying  with  the
provisions  of Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act and is not to be used for
any other purpose.  In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Rub A Dub  Soap,  Inc.  for the year  ended  May 31,  2006,  I, Pam J.
Halter,  hereby  certifies in my capacity as an officer of Rub A Dub Soap,  Inc.
that to my knowledge:

         1. The Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of Rub A Dub Soap,  Inc.  for the
year ended May 31, 2006,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Rub
A Dub Soap,  Inc.  for the year  ended May 31,  2005,  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Rub A
Dub Soap, Inc.

Date:    August 15, 2006              /s/ Pam J. Halter
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Pam J. Halter, Vice President and Principal
                                     Financial and Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 60 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.60
                                     Agreed to November 16, 2012        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
November 15, 2012, through Friday, November 16, 2012, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on 
Monday, November 26, 2012, or such other time on that day as may be 
specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the House adjourns on any legislative day from Friday, 
November 16, 2012, through Friday, November 23, 2012, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 
November 27, 2012, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the 
House, shall notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, 
to reassemble at such place and time as they may designate if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7045

In Re: GREGORY LYNN GORDON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(CA-04-1212-JAB)

Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 11, 2005

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Lynn Gordon, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Lynn Gordon petitions for writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to act. We find there has been no

undue delay in the district court. Gordon also challenges the

magistrate judge’s interpretation of North Carolina law. However,

mandamus relief is not available on this claim because Gordon may

challenge the district court’s decision upon entry of final

judgment on his § 2254 petition. See, e.g., In re United

Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the

mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit32.1**

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

I, Hal M. Krisbergh, the Principal Executive Officerof WorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of WorldGate Communications,Inc., for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, which thiscertification accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andinformation contained in the September 30, 2006 Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofWorldGate Communications, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to WorldGate and will be retained by WorldGateand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
| Dated November 9,2006 |  /s/ HAL M. KRISBERGH                             |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |       Hal M. Krisbergh   |
|                  |      Chief Executive  Officer |
|                  |  (Principal Executive Officer)                    |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 23.2
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-13981 and No. 333-62123) on Form S-8 of Patriot Bank Corp. of our report
dated January 13, 1999, except as to Note 2 which was as of January 22, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Patriot Bank Corp. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report
on Form 10-K of Patriot Bank Corp.
 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 22, 1998