alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 8


                                  SUBSIDIARIES


Companies                                 Jurisdiction of     Name
                                          Organization
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Itabira Rio Doce Company Ltd.             Cayman Islands      ITACO

Rio Doe International Finance Ltd.        Bahamas             RDIF

Ferteco Mineracao S.A.                    Brazil              FERTECO

Para Pigmentos S.A.                       Brazil              Para Pigmentos

SIBRA - Eletrosiderurgica Brasileira      Brazil              SIBRA
S.A.

Navegacao Vale do Rio Doce S.A.           Brazil              DOCENAVE

Vale do Rio Doce Aluminio S.A.            Brazil              ALUVALE

CELMAR S.A. - Industria de Celulose e     Brazil              CELMAR
Papel

Florestas Rio Doce S.A.                   Brazil              Florestas Rio Doce

Urucum Minercao S.A.                      Brazil              Urucum

Rio Doce Manganese Europe                 France              RDME
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Neurodevelopment, Neurodegeneration, Neuroimmunology, Infections Diseases and Brain Tumors.                    

*Date:*                         July 29, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Pat Manos, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5200, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-408-9866,                         *manospa@csr.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 12, 2021. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-15120 Filed 7-15-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,096-01

EX PARTE EMIR ORTIZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20170D02908-34-1 IN THE 346TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated kidnapping (count I), aggravated assault with a deadly

weapon (count II), family-violence assault by impeding breathing or circulation (count III), and

continuous family violence. Applicant originally received deferred adjudication and was placed on

community supervision. Applicant’s deferred status was adjudicated, and he was sentenced to thirty

years’ imprisonment on each of the four counts, to run concurrently. Applicant did not appeal his

convictions. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,

and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his thirty-year sentences for counts II, III, and

IV are illegal and that counsel was ineffective for failing to object when the trial judge imposed those
2

sentences. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Pue, 552

S.W.3d 226, 228 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018); Ex parte Parrott, 396 S.W.3d 531, 534 (Tex. Crim. App.

2013); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be

developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODECRIM.PROC. art.

11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In

developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). It appears

that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine

if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorneyto represent

Applicant at the hearing.. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

sentences were illegal, including whether the trial judge’s pronounced sentence(s) is/are correctly

reflected in the judgements adjudicating guilt. The trial court shall also make specific findings and

conclusions as to whether trial counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. 

The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response

to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
3

Filed: October 20, 2021

Do not publish
# C_2019270EN.01001702.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 10 May 2019 — Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v BVBA Weareone.World, NV Wecandance

(Case C-372/19)

(2019/C 270/19)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Ondernemingsrechtbank Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM)

Defendants: BVBA Weareone.World, NV Wecandance

Questions referred

Must Article 102 TFEU, whether or not read in conjunction with Article 16 of Directive 2014/26/EU (1) on collective management of copyright and related rights and the multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market, be interpreted as meaning that there is abuse of a dominant position if a copyright management company which has a de facto monopoly in a Member State, applies a remuneration model to organisers of musical events for the right to communicate musical works to the public, based among other things on turnover,

| 1. | which uses a flat-rate tariff in tranches, instead of a tariff that takes into account the precise share (making use of advanced technical tools) of the music repertoire protected by the management company played during the event? |
| --- | --- |

1.

which uses a flat-rate tariff in tranches, instead of a tariff that takes into account the precise share (making use of advanced technical tools) of the music repertoire protected by the management company played during the event?

| 2. | which makes licence fees dependent on external elements such as, inter alia, the admission price, the price of refreshments, the artistic budget for the performers and the budget for other elements, such as decor? |
| --- | --- |

2.

which makes licence fees dependent on external elements such as, inter alia, the admission price, the price of refreshments, the artistic budget for the performers and the budget for other elements, such as decor?

---

(1)  OJ 2014 L 84, p. 72.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Internal Revenue Service published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of June 1, 2021, concerning request for comments on Form 8995 and Form 8995-A.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jon Callahan, (737) 800-7639, at Internal Revenue Service, Room 6526, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224, or through the internet at                         *jon.r.callahan@irs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of June 1, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-11445, on page 29360, in the second column, correct the “Estimated Time per Respondent” and “Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours” captions to read:                

*Estimated Time per Respondent:*                     8 hours, 7 minutes.                

*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*                     336,107,360.                

Dated: July 15, 2021.

Jon R. Callahan,

Tax Analyst.

[FR Doc. 2021-15499 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
exv10w16






Exhibit 10.16




COMARCO INC.




NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY




EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 2009




CASH COMPENSATION





Annual Retainers for Serving as Chairpersons




Chairman of the Board. The non-employee Chairman of the Board shall be paid an annual
retainer of $12,000 (or such other amount as determined by the Board) and he or she shall be
entitled to receive any additional annual retainers for serving as the chairperson of any
Board Committees.




Committee Chairpersons. Non-employee directors shall be paid the following annual retainers
for serving as the chairperson of a committee of the Board:




	 	•	 	$6,000  —  Audit Committee
	 
	 	•	 	$5,000  —  Compensation Committee
	 
	 	•	 	$5,000  —  Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	 
	 	•	 	$5,000  —  Any other standing committee of the Board






Additional Annual Retainers




Retainer for Serving on the Board. Each non-employee directors shall be paid an annual
retainer of $33,000 for his or her service on the Board.




Retainer for Serving on Committees. Non-employee directors who serve on, but do not chair a
committee of the Board, shall not be paid any annual retainers for service on such
committee.




Board/Committee Meeting Fees




No separate meeting fees shall be paid for attendance at any Board or Committee meetings.




Adjustments




All amounts above may be revised as determined by the Board from time to time in its
discretion.



EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION





Non-employee directors shall be eligible to receive equity-based compensation awards
pursuant to the Company’s 2005 Incentive Plan, and pursuant to any other equity-based
compensation plan of the Company, as determined by the Board of Directors from time to time.



TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT





Each of the non-employee directors shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for reasonable
travel expenses which they properly incur in connection with their functions and duties as a
director.



AMENDMENTS, REVISION AND TERMINATION





This policy may be amended, revised or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time and
from time-to-time.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         July 14, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 30, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 709 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-106, CP2021-108.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-14998 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001030451
<NAME> ANCHOR HOLDINGS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                             562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,168)
<INVENTORY>                                     35,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,300
<PP&E>                                         158,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,987)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,923
<BONDS>                                        230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,007)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,049
<SALES>                                        207,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,341
<CGS>                                          181,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (438)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,766)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (131)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,635)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.28)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 12.1**
I, Roger Agnelli, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Companhia Vale Do RioDoce;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
          Date: June 10, 2004                                                         /s/ Roger Agnelli   Name:  Roger Agnelli   Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### 230-79 Equity, Inc., Appellant, v Robert Mancuso et al., Defendants, and Alan Spigelman et al., Respondents.

[945 NYS2d 294]—

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered December 9, 2010, which, inter alia, granted defendant 240-79 Owners Corp.’s motion for summary judgment declaring that the cost of repairing and maintaining the subject common retaining wall shall be divided proportionately among only the parties whose properties touch upon the now damaged section of the wall and that, going forward, those parties are responsible pro rata for the maintenance and repair of only that section of the wall that touches their properties, and so declared, and granted summary judgment dismissing all causes of action, counterclaims, and cross claims against defendants Alan Spigelman and Diane Spigelman, Edward Kreps and Sharon Kreps, defendants Edmund Stevens, Jr., Shari Ream Stevens, Barry L. Solar, as trustees of the Edmund Stevens, Jr. qualified terminable interest trust for Shari Ream Stevens, and defendants Robert Mancuso, Harriet Stein Mancuso, and Bernard and Bernice Stein (collectively, 78th Street defendants), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court correctly determined that the cost of repairing and maintaining the common retaining wall should be divided proportionately among those parties whose properties touch upon the damaged section of the wall and that prospectively the parties will be responsible pro rata for the maintenance and repair of only that section of the wall that touches their property *(see*Administrative Code of City of NY § 28-305.1.1; *Bauer v Lovelace,*272 App Div 820 [1947]).

The 78th Street defendants demonstrated that the damaged section of the wall that is the subject of this action is located on the portion of the wall that abuts plaintiffs, 240-79 Owners Corp.’s, and defendant GBL 78th Street LLC’s properties. There is no support in the record for plaintiff’s assertion that the damage extends to portions of the wall that abut the 78th Street defendants’ respective properties. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Moskowitz and Acosta, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 33089(H).]