alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 51 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 51

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2012

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Friday, June 
29, 2012, through Monday, July 2, 2012, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, July 9, 2012, 
or such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority 
Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on 
any legislative day from Friday, June 29, 2012, through Friday, July 6, 
2012, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
majority leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on 
Monday, July 9, 2012, or until time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the 
House, shall notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, 
to reassemble at such place and time as they may designate if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wilfredo Delgado, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Groh, J.), rendered February 5,1982, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*765Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised upon appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606.) Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
# C_2020414EN.01003401.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Brown v Commission

(Case T-18/19) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Official with United Kingdom nationality at the date of entering the service - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Acquisition of the nationality of the country of employment during the course of a career - Loss of the expatriation allowance - Equal treatment - Principle of non-discrimination - Article 4(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations)

(2020/C 414/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Colin Brown (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: I. Van Damme, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 19 March 2018 of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) withdrawing the applicant’s entitlement to the expatriation allowance and to the payment of travel expenses and, secondly, re-establishment of those benefits with effect from 1 December 2017.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Colin Brown and the European Commission to bear their own respective costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Colin Brown and the European Commission to bear their own respective costs;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 28, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00260

- CV

H.K. Global Trading, Ltd., Appellant

v.

Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and Greg Abbott,

Attorney General of t he State of Texas, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on December 21, 2012 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### In the Matter of Wilbert L., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 749]—

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about June 17, 2011, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, and placed him on enhanced supervision probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Enhanced supervision probation, which was recommended by the Probation Department, was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The underlying offense was a violent sexual attack. In addition, appellant had a poor disciplinary and attendance record at school, and admitted using marijuana and alcohol. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Catterson, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydrogen Power, Inc. (“HP” or the
“Company”), formerly known as Equitex, Inc. and Hydrogen Power International,
      Inc., on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”). I, Henry
      Fong, President, Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and
      for
      the periods presented in the Report.








/s/
                Henry FongHenry
                FongPresident,
                Treasurer,Chief
                Executive and Accounting OfficerNovember
                20, 2006








A
      SIGNED
      ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED
      TO
      HP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
      AND
      FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
      REQUEST.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 37197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14998]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: July 14, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 30, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 709 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-106, CP2021-
108.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-14998 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of CuraGen Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  | 
|---------------------- |  |  | 
|Dated: August 12, 2003 |  |  | 
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 12, 2003 |  |  | 
|                       |  |  | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-11011 

Conference Calendar

__________________

ALCARIO VERA,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL

DIVISION; MIKE WARREN; G. ANDERSON,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:95-CV-20-C

- - - - - - - - - -

April 18, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is an appeal from the dismissal pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(6) of a state prisoner's civil rights complaint

brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Appellant contends that the

district court erred by dismissing his complaint for failure to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed

the record, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and

the district court's order of dismissal, and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of October 31, 2005, and for the period then ended.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/    TRACY G. SMITH                     
|Tracy G. Smith                            
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



January 30, 2006
# C_2020045EN.01002001.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 31 October 2019 — Company Z v Tax Office Y

(Case C-802/19)

(2020/C 45/17)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Company Z

Defendant: Tax Office Y

Questions referred

| 1. | Based on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24 October 1996, Elida Gibbs, C-317/94 (EU:C:1996:400), is a pharmacy which supplies medicinal products to a statutory health insurance fund entitled to reduce the taxable amount as a result of a discount granted to the persons insured under a health insurance scheme? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Based on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24 October 1996, Elida Gibbs, C-317/94 (EU:C:1996:400), is a pharmacy which supplies medicinal products to a statutory health insurance fund entitled to reduce the taxable amount as a result of a discount granted to the persons insured under a health insurance scheme?

| 2. | In the event that this is answered in the affirmative: Is it contrary to the principles of neutrality and equal treatment in the internal market if a pharmacy in the national territory is able to reduce the taxable amount, but a pharmacy which supplies the statutory health insurance fund by means of an intra-Community, tax-exempt supply from another Member State is not able to do so? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event that this is answered in the affirmative: Is it contrary to the principles of neutrality and equal treatment in the internal market if a pharmacy in the national territory is able to reduce the taxable amount, but a pharmacy which supplies the statutory health insurance fund by means of an intra-Community, tax-exempt supply from another Member State is not able to do so?

---
EX-10.3






Exhibit 10.3




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

DELUXE CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




The Deluxe Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), as amended and restated
effective January 1, 2009, is hereby further amended as follows, pursuant to a resolution of the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors adopted December 8, 2009, and the authority
reserved in Section 12 of the Plan.



1. Section 5 of the Plan is amended by the addition of a new Section 5.7 to read as follows:




“5.7 Enforcement of Clawbacks. In the event that a Participant becomes obligated to repay
any Incentive Compensation to the Company pursuant to any clawback, recoupment, or similar
policy and/or plan adopted by the Company, or any applicable law, then the portion of the
Participant’s Deferral Account that the Committee determines to be attributable to deferred
Incentive Compensation that relates to performance periods beginning on or after January 1,
2010, whether or not the Incentive Compensation that the Participant is obligated to repay
is the same as the Incentive Compensation that was deferred (including any investment
earnings or benefit plan equivalents attributable to such deferred Incentive Compensation),
or such lesser amount as the Committee determines, in its reasonable discretion, to be
equitable, shall be forfeited and deducted from the Participant’s Deferral Account;
provided, that the total amount of deferred Incentive Compensation that is forfeited (not
including attributable investment earnings or benefit plan equivalents) shall not exceed the
total amount of Incentive Compensation the Participant would have been obligated to repay to
the Company if none of the Participant’s Incentive Compensation had been deferred, less any
Incentive Compensation repaid by the Participant to the Company. To the extent the
Participant has previously received any distributions from the Deferral Account, including
any hardship withdrawals, such distributions shall be treated as coming first from the
portion of the Deferral Account that is not subject to forfeiture pursuant to this Section
5.7.”



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Deluxe has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf this
8th day of December, 2009.




DELUXE CORPORATION




By: /s/ Anthony C. Scarfone

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary
# C_2019328EN.01005901.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/59

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 July 2019 — Camerin v Commission

(Case T-367/19 R)

(Interim measures - Civil Service - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2019/C 328/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Laure Camerin (Bastia, France) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, T. S. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking, first, suspension of the operation of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements of 17 April 2019 regarding the execution of the attachment order on the applicant’s pension and, second, the adoption of provisional measures to ensure that the amounts subject to attachment do not exceed the monthly sum corresponding to the basic salary of an official at the first step of grade AST 1.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | Costs reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs reserved.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4491-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Maryland (FEMA-4491-DR), dated March 26, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on July 6, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, MaryAnn Tierney, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Janice P. Barlow as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2021-15622 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
# C_2020433EN.01004701.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Dvectis CZ v EUIPO — Yado (Support pillow)

(Case T-818/19) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered community design representing a support pillow - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Informed user - Degree of freedom of the designer - No different overall impression - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons)

(2020/C 433/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dvectis CZ s. r. o. (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Svojanovská, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Yado s. r. o. (Handlová, Slovakia)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2019 (Case R 513/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Yado and Dvectis CZ.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dvectis CZ s. r. o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dvectis CZ s. r. o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

---