alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          11,712
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,115)
<INVENTORY>                                     44,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,944
<PP&E>                                          50,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                (29,529)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,635
<BONDS>                                        273,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   385,420
<SALES>                                         79,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,661
<CGS>                                           49,921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,599
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2022340EN.01005701.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/57

---

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2022 — FV v Council

(Case T-542/19) (1)

(2022/C 340/77)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.

---
861 F.2d 1283

#### NEW YORK STATE OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, et al., Appellants v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of H.H.S.

Nos. 87-5057, 87-5065.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1988.

ON APPELLANTS’ SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING *EN BANC.*

Before WALD, Chief Judge, ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, *89D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellants’ Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. No member of the Court requested the taking of a vote thereon. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

ROBINSON, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order.

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, filed the attached statement concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.

STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge,

concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.

Appellants have suggested rehearing en banc, objecting to the panel majority’s statement that a privacy claim — framed by the panel as a facial attack on the statutory approval requirement *per se,*Maj. Op. 854 F.2d at 1386—cannot prevail because the appellants failed to make a “definite showing of medical necessity,” *id.*at 1391. As I read the Suggestion of Appellants for Rehearing en banc, however, it confirms my prior understanding that they have made no facial attack; they never objected to the approval requirement per se, detached from the actual prospect of losing access to a second surgeon. Compare Suggestion of Appellants at 7 n. 8 with Concurring Op. at 1394-95. The seriousness of that prospect was unclear enough to lead both the majority and me to conclude that the case was not ripe. Accordingly, I do not believe that the case represents a holding of any kind on the legal issue that ultimately concerns appellants: the scope of any constitutional limits on the federal government’s power to substantively obstruct patients' access to medical services that they reasonably deem valuable. Taking this view of the case, I have not called for a court vote on appellants’ suggestion.
SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

MONICA JONES, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE 

CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO 

MASTER SERVICING; MORTGAGE 

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION 

SYSTEMS, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, 

N.A.; AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE 

SERVICING, INC.; AND U.S. BANK 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE 

FOR TBW MORTGAGE-BACKED TRUST 

MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-3, 

Respondents. 

No. 68470 

FILED 

APR 1 5 2016 

TRACE K. LINCFMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

BY __SLYSztaa_, 

DEPUTY CLERK 

4 

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order, certified as 

final under NRCP 54(b), granting a motion to dismiss in a quiet title 

action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, 

Judge. 

Appellant contends that the district court erred by denying 

her "Opposition and Counter Motion without stating a reason" for the 

denial. Having considered appellant's appeal statement and the record, 

we perceive no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss 

Wells Fargo Master Servicing, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, 

Wells Fargo Bank, and American Home Mortgage Servicing from the 

underlying action, as appellant acknowledged that she was not seeking 

any relief against those entities even though those entities were named as 

(0) I.07A ao-11t7G, 
Douglas 

Cherry 71 

defendants in appellant's second amended complaint.' We likewise 

perceive no reversible error in the district court's refusal to impose 

sanctions or hold any attorneys in contempt because, among other 

reasons, the district court was within its discretion in determining that 

the complained-of conduct did not warrant sanctions or a contempt order. 

See In re Water Rights of the Humboldt River, 118 Nev. 901, 907, 59 P.3d 

1226, 1230 (2002); Bergmann v. Boyce, 109 Nev. 670, 676, 856 P.2d 560, 

564 (1993). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

Gibbo 

J. 

cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge 

Monica Jones 

Wright, Finlay & Zak, LIP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

1Because those entities were named as defendants, the district court 

had jurisdiction to rule on their motion to dismiss, which was brought 

under NRCP 12(b)(5). See Fritz Hansen A/ S v. Eighth Judicial Dist. 

Court, 116 Nev. 650, 656-57, 6 P.3d 982, 986 (2000) (recognizing that lack 

of service of process does not deprive the district court of jurisdiction over 

a defendant when the defendant chooses not to raise that defense). 

2We have considered appellant's remaining arguments and conclude 

that they do not warrant reversal of the appealed order. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A ea)
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 12
 
Rose Hills Company and Subsidiaries
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in Millions)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED        NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                               SEPTEMBER 30,             SEPTEMBER 30,
                                            1997        1996          1997         1996
                                          COMPANY    PREDECESSOR    COMPANY    PREDECESSOR
                                          -------    -----------    -------    -----------
<S>                                       <C>        <C>            <C>        <C>
 
Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges
 
Earnings:
  Income before income taxes                 (1.4)           2.1        (.2)           5.5       
  Add: Fixed charges, net                     4.4             .5       12.4            1.4       
                                             ----           ----       ----           ----       
                                                                                                 
Income before income taxes                                                                       
  and fixed charges, net                      3.0            2.6       12.2            6.9       
                                                                                                 
Fixed Charges:                                                                                   
  Total interest expense (1)                  4.4             .5       12.4            1.4       
  Interest factor rents                         0              0          0              0       
                                             ----           ----       ----           ----       
                                                                                                 
  Total fixed charges                         4.4             .5       12.4            1.4       
                                                                                                 
Ratio of earnings to                                                                             
 fixed charges                                 .7            5.2        1.0            4.9       
                                                                                                 
Coverage deficiency (excess)                  1.4           (2.1)        .2           (5.5)       
 
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HIE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
THE HIE, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,160
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,692
<PP&E>                                           5,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,930
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           256
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,267
<SALES>                                         25,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,315
<CGS>                                           11,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,195
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,504)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,504)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.34)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

 

**Section906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Hal M. Krisbergh, thePrincipal Executive Officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-Q/A of WorldGateCommunications, Inc., for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Form10-Q/A”), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and (2) theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of WorldGateCommunications, Inc.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WorldGate andwill be retained by WorldGate and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated: | January 23, 2006 | /s/ HAL M. KRISBERGH                                   |
|--------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |             | Hal M. Krisbergh                                       |
|   |             | Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 March 12, 2007
    
    /s/ William T. Fejes, Jr.
    
    President and CEOWilliam T. Fejes, Jr.March 12, 2007
    
    /s/ Joseph C. Horvath
    
    Chief Financial OfficerJoseph C. Horvath
  67
# C_2019172EN.01004201.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/42

---

Action brought on 28 March 2019 — Puma v EUIPO (SOFTFOAM)

(Case T-182/19)

(2019/C 172/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark SOFTFOAM — Application for registration No 17 363 318

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 January 2019 in Case R 1399/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002, of Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
W. Baker, President (Principal Executive Officer), certify (i) that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ Robert W. Baker
                                          --------------------------
                                          Robert W. Baker
                                          President
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)

                                          March 31, 2003
Exhibit 32.2



THANKSGIVING COFFEE COMPANY, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Joan KatzeffPresidentMarch 23, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical Courses.                    

*Date:*                         August 30, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Greg Bissonette, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1622,                         *bissonettegb@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 15, 2021.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-15450 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2022398EN.01002301.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium v Commission

(Case T-642/19) (1)

(State aid - Aid implemented by Belgium in favour of JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 398/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Winckler, G. Babin and B. Cambier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braga da Cruz, C. Georgieva and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Clear Channel Belgium (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru and L. Panepinto, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 4466 final of 24 June 2019 on State aid SA.33078 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Belgium in favour of JC Decaux Belgium Publicité.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Clear Channel Belgium to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Clear Channel Belgium to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)

          CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
         RELATING TO THE ANNUAL REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     I, Arthur B. Winkleblack, Director, Vice President and Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer of H.J. Heinz Finance Company, a Delaware corporation ("Heinz
Finance"), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

     1. Heinz Finance's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended April
        30, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        Heinz Finance.

Date: July 24, 2003

                                          By: /s/ ARTHUR B. WINKLEBLACK
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Arthur B. Winkleblack
                                            Title:  Director, Vice President and
                                                    Chief
                                                 Financial and Accounting
                                                    Officer