alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022303EN.01003801.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — thyssenkrupp v Commission

(Case T-584/19) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - Market for the production and distribution of flat carbon steel - Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement - Relevant market - Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition - Commitments - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 303/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: thyssenkrupp AG (Duisburg and Essen, Germany) (represented by: M. Klusmann, J. Ziebarth and M. Dästner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte, T. Franchoo, I. Zaloguin and C. Sjödin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 4228 final of 11 June 2019 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case M.8713 — Tata Steel/thyssenkrupp/JV).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders thyssenkrupp AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders thyssenkrupp AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of October 31, 2007, and for the period then ended.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Neil D. Wilkin, Jr.              
|Neil D. Wilkin, Jr.                  
|Chairman of the Board of Directors,  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|January 29, 2008
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Hua Meng, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Dahua Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   March 28, 2007





|                                                               | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Hua Meng                                                   | 
|Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer                              | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  September  30,  2000 Pen  Interconnect,  Inc.  financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>              0001000266
<NAME>             Pen Interconnect, Inc.
<CURRENCY>         US



<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                1.00

<CASH>                                         9,319
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               18,924
<PP&E>                                         1,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                 154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,996,838
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    10
<COMMON>                                       275,969
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,253,019)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,798
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,634,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             358,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,634,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,635,535)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,274,211)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2,018,547
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,891,199)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.10)



</TABLE>
# C_2021035EN.01004501.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Ace of spades v EUIPO — Krupp and Borrmann (JC JEAN CALL Champagne GRANDE RÉSERVE)

(Case T-621/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark JC JEAN CALL Champagne GRANDE RÉSERVE - Earlier three-dimensional EU trade marks - Relative grounds for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2021/C 35/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ace of spades Holdings LLC (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: A. Gómez López, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gerhard Ernst Krupp (Munich, Germany), Elmar Borrmann (Reith, Austria)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2019 (Case R 2/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Ace of spades Holdings and Messrs Krupp and Borrmann.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 June 2019 (Case R 2/2019-5) in so far as it dismissed the appeal brought by Ace of spades Holdings LLC and rejected the opposition based on Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 June 2019 (Case R 2/2019-5) in so far as it dismissed the appeal brought by Ace of spades Holdings LLC and rejected the opposition based on Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17037 and #17038; ILLINOIS Disaster Number IL-00064]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Illinois dated 07/16/2021. *Incident:*
                         Tornado. *Incident Period:*
                         06/21/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 07/16/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/14/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/18/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     DuPage. *Contiguous Counties:* Illinois: Cook, Kane, Kendall, Will. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.625Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.760Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17037 C and for economic injury is 17038 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Illinois. 
 
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-15524 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
# C_2021462EN.01006001.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/60

---

Order of the General Court of 27 August 2021 — Rentokil Initial and Rentokil Initial 1927 v Commission

(Case T-692/19) (1)

(2021/C 462/75)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 432, 23.12.2019.

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 25, 2008

p1117 

# Order

November 25, 2008

137129

CHARLES JOHNSON, Plaintiff,

v SC: 137129 AGC: 1489/08; 1490/08 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
# C_2019399EN.01002301.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 23 August 2019 — Sappi Austria Produktions-GmbH & Co KG and Wasserverband ‘Region Gratkorn-Gratwein’

(Case C-629/19)

(2019/C 399/27)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Sappi Austria Produktions-GmbH & Co KG, Wasserverband ‘Region Gratkorn-Gratwein’

Defendant authority: Landeshauptmann der Steiermark

Questions referred

| 1. | Is sewage sludge to be regarded as waste in light of the exclusion under Article 2(2)(a) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (1) in conjunction with Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment and/or the Sewage Sludge Directive, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1137/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008? (2) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is sewage sludge to be regarded as waste in light of the exclusion under Article 2(2)(a) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (1) in conjunction with Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment and/or the Sewage Sludge Directive, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1137/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008? (2)

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the affirmative: | Does Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives permit a substance to be classified as a by-product within the meaning of the concept of waste under EU law if, for process-related reasons, other substances which would otherwise have to be regarded as waste are added to that substance in a small proportion, if this has no effect on the composition of the substance as a whole and provides a significant benefit to the environment? |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative:

Does Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives permit a substance to be classified as a by-product within the meaning of the concept of waste under EU law if, for process-related reasons, other substances which would otherwise have to be regarded as waste are added to that substance in a small proportion, if this has no effect on the composition of the substance as a whole and provides a significant benefit to the environment?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 312, p. 3.

(2)  OJ 2008 L 311, p. 1.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11277

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BONIFACIO GOROSTIETA-CASAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-267-1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Bonifacio Gorostieta-Casas

raises an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 

523 U.S. 224, 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a 

sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment. 

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11277 Document: 00513557078 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
No. 15-11277

2

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-11277 Document: 00513557078 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Graustark Members II, LLC v. Mark Minor

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00647

- CV

Trial court case number: 1132739

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 2 of H arris Co unty

Appellant, Graustark Members II, LLC, ha s filed a n unopposed m otion for its counsel

, Crystal T. Dang of Dow Golub Remels and Gilbreath, PLLC , to w ithdraw and for Sanford L.

Dow and Alexandra M. Wolf of Dow Golub Remels and Gilbreath, PLLC

, to substitute in as its

counsel. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5

. T he motion is granted

.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to note the withdrawal of Crystal T. Dang of Dow

Golub Remels and Gilbreath, PLLC

, as counsel for appellant and t o substitute Sanford L. D ow

and Alexandra M. Wolf of Dow Golub Remels and Gilbreath, PLLC

, as counsel for appellant on

the docket of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

________ /s/ J ulie Countiss

_____________ Acting individually

Date: January 9, 20 20
#### Thomas DORSEY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Stan BURTT, Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution, Respondent—Appellee, and Henry McMaster, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-8054.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2009.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2009.

Thomas Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Dorsey seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis-positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee, 252*F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dorsey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2146 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2146

               To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-ADPA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-ADPA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-ADPA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.07       4-                 Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Aminodiphenylamin                                                  31/2009
                         e (CAS No. 101-54-
                         2) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2921.51.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```