alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Joel Boyarski, the Chief Executive officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of WorldGate Communications, Inc., for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "September 30, 2002
Form 10-Q"), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o[d]) and information contained in the September 30, 2002 Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of WorldGate Communications, Inc.

|Dated: 11/14/02 |  |  | /s/JOEL BOYARSKIJoel Boyarski
|--------------- |  |  | -----------------------------

---

QuickLinks
# C_2021310EN.01002201.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Health Product Group v EUIPO — Bioline Pharmaceutical (Enterosgel)

(Case T-678/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Enterosgel - No bad faith - Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 310/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Health Product Group sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, M. Stępień and A. Przytuła, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bioline Pharmaceutical AG (Baar, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Grucelski, H. Gajek and M. Furmańska, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2019 (Case R 482/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Health Product Group and Bioline Pharmaceutical.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Health Product Group sp. z o.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Health Product Group sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.

---
#### Rafael Berroa, Sr., Respondent, v Jason Misrahi, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[943 NYS2d 17]

Order, Supreme Court, New York (Kibbie F. Payne, J.), entered January 28, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, following a nonjury trial, cancelled the mortgage and lien possessed by defendant Jason Misrahi and dismissed the counterclaim, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the trial court’s finding that plaintiff is the Rafael Berroa who owned the apartment that was pledged as collateral for a mortgage given to defendant Misrahi by defendant Rafael Berroa, Jr., plaintiff’s son, without plaintiff’s knowledge or authorization *(see Saperstein v Lewenberg, 11*AD3d 289 [2004]). Notwithstanding plaintiffs impaired mental capacity at the time of trial, his testimony indicated that he, not his son, owned the apartment and that he did not authorize his son to act for him. The building manager testified that plaintiff was the Rafael Berroa who owned the apartment and that plaintiffs son was not the owner. Misrahi submitted no evidence that controverted this testimony. Misrahi relied on the son’s possession of the stock certificate and possession of the proprietary lease as indicia of ownership. However, the son’s *580driver’s license, which was presented as identification at the closing, lists his name as “Rafael Berroa Cruz,” which does not match the name on the stock certificate and the lease.

Contrary to Misrahi’s contention, plaintiffs default in replying to his counterclaim is not the equivalent of an answer that fails to deny the substantive allegations of the complaint and is deemed an admission of those allegations *(see Ballard v Billings & Spencer Co.,*36 AD2d 71, 74 [1971]). In any event, the counterclaim was correctly dismissed in light of the finding in favor of plaintiff on thé case in chief. Concur — Tom, J.P., Catterson, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Roman, JJ.
# C_2019372EN.01001101.xml

| 4.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/11 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) lodged on 11 July 2019 — PO v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real (Case C-531/19) (2019/C 372/10) Language of the case: Spanish Referring court Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: PO Defendant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real Question referred Is an interpretation such as that set out in judgments of the Spanish Supreme Court No 191/2019 of 19 February 2019, appeal in cassation 5607/2017 (ECLI:ES:TS:2019:580), and No 257/2019 of 27 February 2019, appeal in cassation 5809/2017 (ECLI:ES:TS:2019:663), according to which, through an interpretation of Directive 2001/40/EC, ( 1 ) it is possible to come to the conclusion that any third-country national holding a long-term residence permit who has committed an offence punishable by a sentence of at least one year in duration can and should be ‘automatically’ removed, that is to say, [without] needing to give any consideration to his personal, family, social or employment circumstances, compatible with Article 12 of Council [Directive] 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, ( 2 ) and with — inter alia — the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 7 December 2017 (Case C-636/16 ( 3 )) and of 8 December 2011 (Case C-371/08 ( 4 ))? ( 1 )  Council Directive 2001/40/EC of 28 May 2001 on the mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third country nationals (OJ 2001 L 149, p. 34). ( 2 )  OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44. ( 3 )  Judgment of 7 December 2017, López Pastuzano (C-636/16, EU:C:2017:949). ( 4 )  Judgment of 8 December 2011, Ziebell (C-371/08, EU:C:2011:809).

---
# C_2019112EN.01004601.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/46

---

Action brought on 5 February 2019 — Sixsigma Networks Mexico v EUIPO — Dokkio (DOKKIO)

(Case T-67/19)

(2019/C 112/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sixsigma Networks Mexico, SA de CV (Mexico city, Mexico) (represented by: C. Casas Feu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dokkio, Inc. (San Mateo, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark DOKKIO — International registration designating the European Union No 1 308 971

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2018 in Case R 1187/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision to the extent that it rejects opposition B 2800087; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision to the extent that it rejects opposition B 2800087;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by Sixsigma Networks Mexico, SA de CV; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by Sixsigma Networks Mexico, SA de CV;

| — | order Dokkio, Inc. to pay the costs incurred by Sixsigma Networks Mexico, SA de CV. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Dokkio, Inc. to pay the costs incurred by Sixsigma Networks Mexico, SA de CV.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4581-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Homeland Security (DHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Colorado (FEMA-4581-DR), dated January 15, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on June 7, 2021.

      ( print page 38735)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Alana B. Kuhn, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Jon K. Huss, as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2021-15630 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Howard Root, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.

        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Howard RootHoward RootChief Executive OfficerOctober 21, 2008




---
# C_2019288EN.01003701.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/37

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 26 June 2019 — Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier v Société Fromagère du Livradois SAS

(Case C-490/19)

(2019/C 288/44)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier

Defendant: Société Fromagère du Livradois SAS

Question referred

Must Article 13(1) of Council Regulation No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 (1) and Article 13(1) of Regulation No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 (2) be interpreted as prohibiting solely the use by a third party of the registered name, or must they be interpreted as prohibiting the presentation of a product protected by a designation of origin, in particular the reproduction of the shape or the appearance which are characteristic of it, which is liable to mislead the consumer as to the true origin of the product, even if the registered name is not used?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2006 L 93, p. 12).

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 1 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That (a) when the Senate adjourns or recesses on any day from 
Wednesday, January 5, 2011, through Monday, January 10, 2011, on a 
motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority 
Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned or recessed until 10 a.m. on 
Tuesday, January 25, 2011, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant 
to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and
     (b) when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
January 12, 2011, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, January 18, 2011, or until the time of any 
reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and when the House adjourns on any legislative 
day from Wednesday, January 26, 2011, through Friday, January 28, 2011, 
on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on 
Tuesday, February 8, 2011, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant 
to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Majority Leader of the Senate, or his designee, 
after consultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate, or his 
designee, shall notify the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such 
place and time as he may designate if, in his opinion, the public 
interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the Senate 
recesses or adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by 
its Majority Leader or his designee, the Senate shall again stand 
recessed or adjourned pursuant to the first section of this concurrent 
resolution.
    Sec. 3.  The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with the 
Minority Leader of the House, shall notify Members of the House to 
reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate January 5, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate and an 
              adjournment of the House of Representatives.
```
j 

/ 

I 

I 

, 

I 

I 

/ 

I 

OFFICE OF THE A?-l-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAG 

AUSTIN 

aarable John 1. Turner 

couut y At tornep 

Bee County 

Beevil:e, Texas 

Dear sir: 

,~^ : 

opfplon NO. O-4004 

Her whether deQw@mt tax att0mey r0r independent w00i 

dlatrlat to make barger for 

stationery, rtaarps, etc., in 

addition to 15% of the amount 

oollectsd 

ve hove reaelved your letter of resent date In which 

pow astic the opinion of thl8 depestment upon the above aaptloned 

~qlM%ltiOn. 

The &tatute# whlah gotern the making of delZnqtient te.x 

aontraatu with independent rahool dirtriatr We Arttale 7343, 

7335, and 73356, Vernonla Annotated Civil StatUtee. It ~88 deiinltely determined by the Commirrian of Appeala In the resent ease 

of Bell v. Manafield Independent Who01 Dint., l29 3. U. (2d) 

629, that 15% of the taxee oolleoted yes the 1~6~.Imum mount alloved by l.av-to a tax attorney for ti independent sahoo2 district, 

and that a contraat allowing more than tb.at amoUnt vae void. 

we quote fYom the opl.nAon oi the aourt, 

I As above olnted out, the rrpeoiiio 

leugu&e’oi Artiale 73 $ 3 governs the &araeter of 

contraat vi&lap th8 partlea oould make. That language ll.mLta the oomgenaatlon to thsrt provided by 

lav in elite for state and oountg ta%ee. That 

amount la limited to fift8eIi per Gent 0P the 

mount colleoted and there le no authority io 

l&v for the payment of a gmater p8rWntag8. The 

Contreot Under revlev provides for the payment of 

twenty per amt. 

Art. 7335a, 8 2.“. 

St ia, for that reason, void. 

I 

: 
Bonorable John X. Turner, page 2 

It ia ruurfreat that unleaa the echo01 dirtriot pay@ for 

the rtationery, atsmpta, etc., 

items, 

th8 t.S.X attorney muat provide auoh 

It ia alio aunifest that if the tax attorney reoelver 

of the mount oolleoted plU0 a payment for the above mentioned 

15s 

item8 he vill rsaelve more than 15s of the amount oolleoted, the 

mulmum amount alloved by lav. Under the holding of the Comiarion of Appeals in the above cited case, tbla cannot be done. 

In vlev of the foregoing, you are respectfully advised 

that (L delinquent tax attorney for an independent sohool dlrtrict 

say a.ot make ohrrger Sor atampa, etatlonery, eto., In addition to 

15s of the amount of taxel oOll8at8d. 

l3US:db 

Very truly youra 

ATTORBEX OERERAL OF TE2X3 

018Il.U It. Lavia 

Aaaietant
amendment.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    First Amendment To
Convertible Preferred Securities Agreement

     

    This FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE
PREFERRED SECURITIES AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as
of December 14, 2009, between Ecology Coatings, Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of the state of Nevada (the “Company”), and Equity 11, Ltd., a corporation
organized under the laws of the state of Michigan (the “Purchaser”).

    


     

    1.     The parties agree to amend Section 1.1
of the Agreement to provide the following:

    


    Subject
to the terms and conditions hereof, until the earlier to occur of June 15, 2010
or the acceptance by Company’s Board of Directors of an investment agreement
with any third party for the investment in the Company of at least $3,000,000,
the Purchaser agrees to purchase and the Company agrees to sell and issue to the
Purchaser at the Closings, 5% Convertible Preferred Shares, Series B, at a price
per share of $1,000, convertible into common shares at the Conversion
Price.

    


    


    2.  In all
other respects, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

     

    


     

    


     

    ECOLOGY
COATINGS,
INC.                                                                                    EQUITY
11, LTD.

     

    


     

    BY:  /s/ Robert G.
Crockett                                                                                       
By:  /s/
J.B.
Smith                                           

    Robert G.
Crockett                                                                                                J.B.
Smith

    


    Its:  CEO                                                                                                                       
Its:  Manager
Independent Auditors' Consent

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-59605) on Form S-8 of Lenox Bancorp, Inc. pertaining to the 1997 Incentive Plan of our report dated February 24, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Lenox
Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1999, which report appears in Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co.

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 28, 2000
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 764 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to make technical corrections 

to the segment designations for the Chetco River, Oregon. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7 (legislative day, APRIL 5), 2011 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to make technical 

corrections to the segment designations for the Chetco 

River, Oregon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chetco River Protec5 tion Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE WILD AND SCE7 NIC RIVERS ACT. 

8 Section 3(a)(69) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 

9 (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)(69)) is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 764 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

2 and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively, 

3 and indenting appropriately; 

4 (2) in the matter preceding clause (i) (as so re5 designated), by striking ‘‘The 44.5-mile’’ and insert6 ing the following: 

7 ‘‘(A) DESIGNATIONS.—The 44.5-mile’’; 

8 (3) in clause (i) (as so redesignated)— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘25.5-mile’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘27.5-mile’’; and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘Boulder Creek at the 

12 Kalmiopsis Wilderness boundary’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘Mislatnah Creek’’; 

14 (4) in clause (ii) (as so redesignated)— 

15 (A) by striking ‘‘8’’ and inserting ‘‘7.5’’; 

16 and 

17 (B) by striking ‘‘Boulder Creek to Steel 

18 Bridge’’ and inserting ‘‘Mislatnah Creek to 

19 Eagle Creek’’; 

20 (5) in clause (iii) (as so redesignated)— 

21 (A) by striking ‘‘11’’ and inserting ‘‘9.5’’; 

22 and 

23 (B) by striking ‘‘Steel Bridge’’ and insert24 ing ‘‘Eagle Creek’’; and 

25 (6) by adding at the end the following: 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 764 IS

1 ‘‘(B) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid 

2 rights, the Federal land within the boundaries 

3 of the river segments designated by subpara4 graph (A), is withdrawn from all forms of— 

5 ‘‘(i) entry, appropriation, or disposal 

6 under the public land laws; 

7 ‘‘(ii) location, entry, and patent under 

8 the mining laws; and 

9 ‘‘(iii) disposition under all laws per10 taining to mineral and geothermal leasing 

11 or mineral materials.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS