alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, David H. Ownby, certify that:

 

1.        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of Regal Entertainment Group;

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 
| Date:   March 25, 2015 | /s/ DAVID   H. OWNBY       |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                        | David   H. Ownby                |
|                        | *Chief Financial Officer*       |
|                        | *(Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    SEP-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       SEP-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-03-2000
<CASH>                                 8,347,493
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          5,525,596
<ALLOWANCES>                            (199,291)
<INVENTORY>                            6,352,229
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      21,439,583
<PP&E>                                13,478,982
<DEPRECIATION>                        (9,321,398)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        26,884,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  6,915,540
<BONDS>                                   19,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                 123,146
<OTHER-SE>                            19,253,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          26,884,113
<SALES>                               14,184,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      14,184,519
<CGS>                                  9,297,566
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         13,863,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        (197,940)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          20,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        47,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          470,807
<INCOME-TAX>                             184,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      286,807
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             286,807
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.02


</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
OS the Bteta~ OS Tmw. 

‘1. h.“b tams 00 tha beer in cuns~tfon due 

&at0 OS Tema? 
IJon. Bmt l&n-d,. &age 

The latte,F 

sucmsd by the writer __ . . 
APPROVEDMAR 15, 1940 

L*- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAEI
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3161

_____________________________

PHILIP N. POPPELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

December 1, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1999 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,911,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,789,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                   648,636
<INVENTORY>                                    807,317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,576,841
<PP&E>                                       3,986,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                 760,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,048,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,300,451
<BONDS>                                        666,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     75,849
<COMMON>                                        26,661
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,979,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,048,903
<SALES>                                      9,739,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,739,101
<CGS>                                        2,514,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,514,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,572,417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,175,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,175,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,175,040)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)


</TABLE>
VI 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 654 

For the relief of Djibril Coulibaly. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 28, 2011 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Djibril Coulibaly. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DJIBRIL 

4 COULIBALY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Djibril Coulibaly shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 654 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Djibril Coulibaly 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), Djibril Coulibaly shall be considered 

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other5 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 

6 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Djibril Coulibaly, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

 

 

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Henry P. Herms, the Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

 
    - The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended July 31, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 
    - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

 

/s/ Henry P. Herms Henry P. HermsVice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer (PrincipalSeptember 16, 2013Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1


                   Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Yonglin Du, President and Chief Executive Officer of Dahua Inc. (the
"Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the
year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



By: /s/ Yonglin Du
 ---------------------------
Yonglin Du, President & CEO

December 20, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
12/31/99 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      2,825,652
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               5,822,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                1,059,581
<INVENTORY>                                 1,356,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           10,397,025
<PP&E>                                      5,197,539
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,116,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             16,356,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       3,886,287
<BONDS>                                     2,187,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       69,743
<OTHER-SE>                                 10,213,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               16,356,600
<SALES>                                     5,103,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,103,552
<CGS>                                       1,158,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,158,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            6,698,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            166,466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (2,203,452)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (2,203,452)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2,203,452)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $(.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(.33)



</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00637-CV

IN RE David GOAD

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 17, 2014

MOTION DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On September 9, 2014, David Goad filed a pro se motion seeking an immediate stay of 

proceedings pending in Justice Court No. 4, Guadalupe County, Texas, pursuant to Rule 52.10 of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Although the attachments to the motion suggest that a 

petition for writ of mandamus would also be filed, Goad has not filed a petition.2 Rule 52.10 allows 

a relator to seek temporary relief “pending the court’s action” on a petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10. 

Implicit in Rule 52.10 is the necessity for a petition to be filed before this court can consider any 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. JSC4-4995, styled David Goad v. Jamie Osborne, pending in the Justice 

Court, Precinct 4, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Friesenhahn presiding. 2 It should be noted that this court does not have authority to issue a writ against a justice of the peace. See TEX. GOV’T 

CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004); see also In re Barrera, No. 04-14-00464-CV, 2014 WL 3014696, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio July 2, 2014, orig. proceeding) (dismissing petition seeking mandamus relief against justice of 

the peace for lack of jurisdiction).

 
04-14-00637-CV

grant of temporary relief. See id. At this time, there is no controversy before this court. 

Accordingly, Goad’s motion for immediate stay is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
# C_2019270EN.01002002.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 21 May 2019 — VG Bild-Kunst v Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz

(Case C-392/19)

(2019/C 270/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: VG Bild-Kunst

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz

Question referred

Does the embedding of a work — which is available on a freely accessible website with the consent of the rightholder — in the website of a third party by way of framing constitute communication to the public of that work within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC (1) where it occurs through circumvention of protection measures against framing taken or instigated by the rightholder?

---

(1)  Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10).

---
#### Giovanna P. Infosino, Respondent, v Alfred M. Infosino, Appellant.

— In a matrimonial action, defendant husband *870appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (La Fauci, J.)., dated February 21, 1984, which, *inter alia,*(1) granted plaintiff wife a divorce on the ground of constructive abandonment and dismissed defendant’s counterclaim for divorce; (2) made awards to plaintiff of alimony, child support, counsel fees and arrears of support; (3) deferred decision on further visitation rights of defendant with the parties’ children upon a future application to the Family Court; and (4) directed defendant to make certain other payments to plaintiff, after a nonjury trial.

Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term’s determination that defendant constructively abandoned plaintiff rather than that plaintiff constructively abandoned defendant hinged on the credibility of the parties. The findings of the Trial Judge, who heard all of the testimony, are entitled to great weight *(see, Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 173; *Matter of Thorne,*108 AD2d 865; *Matter of Anonymous,*81 AD2d 865, 866). We find no reason to disturb this finding.

This action was commenced prior to the enactment of the Equitable Distribution Law (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B]). In such a case, the fixing of alimony and counsel fees is discretionary with the trial court upon its balancing of the various aspects of the marital relationship, viz., the financial status of the parties, their health and age, and the duration of the marriage *(see, Hessen v Hessen,*33 NY2d 406; *Schwartz v Schwartz, 52*AD2d 874; *Von Schondorf v Von Schondorf,*51 AD2d 1029). Using this framework, we do not find that the amounts of the awards of permanent alimony and counsel fees in this case constituted an abuse of discretion.

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-2534

STEVEN A. SWAN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. James R. Muirhead, U.S. Magistrate Judge]

Before

 Boudin, Chief Judge,

Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Lynch, Circuit Judge.

Steven A. Swan on brief pro se.

Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, David English

Carmack and Jeffrey R. Meyer, Attorneys, Tax Division, Department

of Justice and Thomas P. Colantuono, United States Attorney, on

brief for appellee.

May 7, 2002
-2-

Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the record and

briefs on appeal, we affirm the judgment for substantially the

reasons given below. 

The appellant’s primary argument on appeal is that

the court’s federal question jurisdiction covered his Sixteenth

Amendment challenge to his income taxes. A frivolous

constitutional issue does not raise a federal question,

however. Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528 (1974); Molina-Crespo

v. Califano, 583 F.2d 572 (1st Cir. 1978). The appellant argues

that the constitutional issue could not be frivolous because he

adduced credible evidence that Congress intended a narrower

income tax. He misses the point. The issue is frivolous

because it has already been decided, not because the evidence

is univocal. The income tax has survived constitutional

challenge. See, e.g., Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920);

Quijano v. United States, 93 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 1996); United

States v. Turano, 802 F.2d 10 (1st Cir. 1986).

The appellant’s remaining arguments merit little

discussion. Given the resolution of the constitutional issue,

the appellant could not show that he was certain to prevail,

precluding equitable relief. Bob Jones University v. Simon,

416 U.S. 725 (1974). The appellant failed to establish

jurisdiction under I.R.C. § 7422(a) by showing that he paid the

taxes and filed claims for refunds. McMillen v. United States

Department of Treasury, 960 F.2d 187 (1st Cir. 1991).
-3-

We hereby deny the appellant’s motion for return of

property and an investigation.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 128 (Thursday, July 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 36187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14514]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special 
Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, August 12, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee will be held Thursday, August 12, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern 
Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written 
statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of 
meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 
1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution 
Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 1, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-14514 Filed 7-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
**Exhibit 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF    2002**     In connection with the annual report on    Form 10-K    of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. (the    “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007    (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and    Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nikolas    Antonopoulos, President and Chief Executive Officer of the    Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,    as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley    Act of 2002, that:     1.     This Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     2.     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.          By:  */s/  Nikolas    Antonopoulos*    Nikolas Antonopoulos    President and Chief Executive Officer     Dated: February 28, 2008     A signed original of this written statement required by    Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be    retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and    Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
ex1028.htm


    POWER
OF ATTORNEY

     

     

    KNOW
ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes,
designates and appoints William
L. McGrath and Martha
Fuller as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with
full power of substitution and resubstitution and full power to act alone and
without the other, for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, to execute, acknowledge, deliver and file any
and all filings required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
including Sections 13 and 16 of such Act, and the rules and regulations
thereunder, and requisite documents in connection with such filings, including
but not limited to Forms 3, 4 and 5 and Schedules 13D and 13G under such act and
any amendments thereto.

     

    This
power of attorney shall be valid from the date hereof until revoked by the
undersigned.

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument as of the 24th day
of November, 2009.

     

    
      	 
      	
              /s/
      Paul G. Allen

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Paul
      G. Allen