alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001030451
<NAME> ANCHOR HOLDINGS INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,652)
<INVENTORY>                                     29,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,539
<PP&E>                                         157,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,750)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,492
<BONDS>                                        180,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                    (64,275)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,657
<SALES>                                        263,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               263,962
<CGS>                                          230,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  256,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    79
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,638)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,667)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,971)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,143
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,828)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.05)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Commerce Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank D. Puissegur, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                                                   
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 1, 2010 |  | /s/ Frank D. Puissegur                                            
|                   |  | Frank D. Puissegur                                                
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer) and Director
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------


                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Denis A.  Krusos,  the  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer  of
CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

  1.     The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended July 31,
         2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                         /s/ Denis A. Krusos
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Denis A. Krusos
                                         Chairman of the Board and
September 18, 2008                        Chief Executive Officer
# Úradný vestník C 134I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 134I |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6525. marca 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 134I

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6525. marca 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informácie |
| | INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE |
| | Európska komisia |
| 2022/C 134 I/01 | Súhrn rozhodnutí Európskej únie o povolení na uvedenie liekov na trh z 25. marca 2022
  (Uverejnené v súlade s článkom 13 alebo 38 nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 726/2004) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

2022/C 134 I/01

Súhrn rozhodnutí Európskej únie o povolení na uvedenie liekov na trh z 25. marca 2022
  (Uverejnené v súlade s článkom 13 alebo 38 nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 726/2004)

(Uverejnené v súlade s článkom 13 alebo 38 nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 726/2004

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

IV Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

| 25.3.2022 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CI 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2022

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CI 134/1

---

Súhrn rozhodnutí Európskej únie o povolení na uvedenie liekov na trh z 25. marca 2022

(Uverejnené v súlade s článkom 13 alebo 38 nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 726/2004 (1))

(2022/C 134 I/01)

| — | Udelenie povolenia na uvedenie na trh (článok 13 nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (Es) č. 726/2004): Prijaté













  Dátum rozhodnutia | Názov lieku | INN (medzinárodný neregistrovaný názov) | Držiteľ povolenia na uvedenie na trh | Číslo záznamu v registri Spoločenstva | Lieková forma | Kód ATC (anatomicko-terapeuticko-chemický kód) | Dátum oznámenia |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.3.2022 | EVUSHELD | tixagevimab / cilgavimab | AstraZeneca AB
  151 85 Södertälje, Sverige | EU/1/22/1651 | Injekčný roztok | J06BD03 | 25.3.2022 |

—

Udelenie povolenia na uvedenie na trh (článok 13 nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (Es) č. 726/2004): Prijaté

Dátum rozhodnutia

Názov lieku

INN (medzinárodný neregistrovaný názov)

Držiteľ povolenia na uvedenie na trh

Číslo záznamu v registri Spoločenstva

Lieková forma

Kód ATC (anatomicko-terapeuticko-chemický kód)

Dátum oznámenia

25.3.2022

EVUSHELD

tixagevimab / cilgavimab

AstraZeneca AB

151 85 Södertälje, Sverige

EU/1/22/1651

Injekčný roztok

J06BD03

25.3.2022

Ak sa chcete oboznámiť s verejnou hodnotiacou správou o príslušných liekoch a s ňou súvisiacimi rozhodnutiami, môžete kontaktovať:

| European Medicines Agency |
| --- |
| Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 |
| 1083 HS Amsterdam |
| NETHERLANDS |

European Medicines Agency

Domenico Scarlattilaan 6

1083 HS Amsterdam

NETHERLANDS

---

(1)  Ú. v. EÚ L 136, 30.4.2004, s. 1.

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joan Katzeff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc for the year ended December 31, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | March 30, 2006         
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Joan Katzeff       
|      |  | Joan Katzeff, President
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in META Group, Inc.'s Registration Statements Nos. 33-80539, 333-1854 and
333-68323 on Form S-8, and Nos. 333-45324, 333-75386 and 333-67557 on Form S-3 of our report dated
February 19, 2002 (March 26 as to Note 9) and appearing on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP

Stamford,
Connecticut
April 1, 2002

1

---
Exhibit 10.16



Simple Promissory Note



$25,000



In the City of Fort Bragg, County of Mendocino, in the State of California, on the 15th day of November, 2003 on demand, Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.
promises to pay to the order of Paul Katzeff and Joan Katzeff the principal sum of Twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) payable in six payments of $4,000 each plus interest at 10% per annum and a seventh payment of $1,000 plus interest on the
fifteenth day of each month, beginning on the 15thday of December, 2003 and continuing until said principal and
interest have been paid in full.



Obligee/Maker of Promise



|                                                                                            |  |                       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|/s/ Joan KatzeffJoan Katzeff, President Officer, Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. Borrower |  | November 15, 2003 Date
|                                                                                            | 
|/s/ Paul KatzeffPaul Katzeff, Lender                                                        |  | November 15, 2003 Date
|                                                                                            | 
|/s/ Joan KatzeffJoan Katzeff, Lender                                                        |  | November 15, 2003 Date
**Exhibit 12.4**
I, Leonardo Moretzsohn de Andrade, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Vale Overseas Limited; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 2, 2005                                 /s/ Leonardo Moretzsohn de Andrade   Name:  Leonardo Moretzsohn de Andrade   Title:  Director and Principal Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 93 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses relating 

to all home schools to be qualified education expenses for purposes 

of a Coverdell education savings account. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses relating to all home schools to be qualified education expenses for purposes of a Coverdell education 

savings account. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 93 IS

1 SECTION 1. ALLOWANCE OF HOME SCHOOL EXPENSES AS 

2 QUALIFIED EDUCATION EXPENSES FOR PUR3 POSES OF A COVERDELL EDUCATION SAV4 INGS ACCOUNT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 530(b) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by add7 ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(C) PRIVATE SCHOOL.—For purposes of 

9 this section, the term ‘private school’ includes 

10 any home school that meets the requirements of 

11 State law applicable to such home schools, 

12 whether or not such school is deemed a private 

13 school for purposes of State law.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 February 28, 2007
    /s/  MARK A.  JACKSONMark A. JacksonChief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Operating Officer 
of Noble Corporation
#### R. L. C. Investors, Inc., Respondent, v Pauline Zabski et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

— Order unanimously reversed, on the law and in the interest of justice, with costs to appellants, and appellants’ motion granted. Memorandum: In this mortgage foreclosure action, Special Term erred in denying the motion of defendant Conway, obligor on the mortgage jointly with defendant Zabski, to reopen or vacate the default and set aside the foreclosure sale of the property to plaintiff, the mortgagee. Although plaintiff performed the mailing and delivery requirements for service on defendant Conway under CPLR 308 (2), it did not complete service by filing until the default judgment had already been taken. Until service was complete, defendant Conway’s time to appear or answer did not begin to run *(see,*CPLR 320 [a]; 3012 [c]); thus, she was not in default at the time the default judgment was taken and the judgment is a nullity *(see, Marazita v Nelbach,*91 AD2d 604; *Reporter Co. v Tomicki, 60*AD2d 947; *Red Creek Natl. Bank v Blue Star Ranch,*58.AD2d 983; McLaughlin, Supplementary Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, 1984-1985 Pocket Part, CPLR C308:2, p 172). We find no merit to plaintiff’s contention that limited informal contacts with plaintiff by an attorney on behalf of defendant Conway in an effort to settle the matter out of court constitute an “appearance” such that defendant Conway may be said to have waived the defect in service *(see generally,*CPLR 320 [a]; *Matter of Jones v Coughlin,*87 AD2d 953, 954; *Matter of Katz,*81 AD2d 145, *affd*55 NY2d 904; McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C320:2, pp 363-364; McLaughlin, Supplementary Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, 1984-1985 Pocket Part, CPLR C320:2, p 246). In the interest of justice, we exercise our discretion to open the default against defendant Zabski as well. Accordingly, the judgment of foreclosure and all proceedings herein taken thereafter are vacated and plaintiff’s cross motion for an order directing a determination of the deficiency is denied. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Murphy, J. — vacate default judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Green and Schnepp, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Theodore Sayers, Respondent, v Kenneth Wessberg, as Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Hampton, et al., Appellants.

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Hampton dated April 26, 1983, denying petitioner’s application for a use variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pantano, J.), dated October 18, 1984, which vacated the determination.

Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, determination confirmed, and proceeding dismissed on the merits.

Our review of the record indicates that the Board’s denial of the variance had a rational basis. Thus, Special Term erred when it substituted its judgment for that of the Board and reversed the Board’s determination. It is well established "that local zoning boards have discretion in considering applications for variances and the judicial function is a limited one. A zoning board determination should not be set aside unless there is a showing of illegality, arbitrariness or abuse of discretion * * * That is to say, the determination * * * will be sustained if it has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence” *(Matter of Fuhst v Foley,*45 NY2d 441, 444). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
# C_2020230EN.01003301.xml

| 13.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Martínez Albainox v EUIPO — Taser International (TASER)

(Case T-341/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark TASER - Earlier EU word marks TASER - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Detriment to reputation - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2020/C 230/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Martínez Albainox, SL (Albacete, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Taser International, Inc. (Scottsdale, Arizona, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 March 2019 (Case R 1577/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Taser International and Martínez Albainox.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Martínez Albainox, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Martínez Albainox, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.

---
#### KING et al. v. ROSS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 18, 1898.)

Action by William D. King and others against Eugenia A. W. Ross.

No opinion. Motion denied, upon payment of $10 costs to enable appellant to move in court below to open default.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Optical Cable Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of October 31, 2010, and for the period then ended.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Neil D. Wilkin, Jr.              
|Neil D. Wilkin, Jr.                  
|Chairman of the Board of Directors,  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|January 24, 2011