alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Regal Entertainment Group:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-87958 and 333-127367) on Form S-8 of Regal
Entertainment Group of our report dated March 1, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Regal Entertainment Group as of December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009,
and the related consolidated statements of income, deficit and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of
Regal Entertainment Group.

Our
report refers to changes in the manner in which the Company accounts for noncontrolling interests as of January 2, 2009 (note 2), convertible debt instruments as of
January 2, 2009 (notes 2 and 5) and uncertain tax positions as of December 29, 2006 (note 7).

/s/
KPMG LLP

Nashville,
Tennessee
March 1, 2010

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Palmer, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 778] —

Appeal by the de*1142fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 9, 2010, convicting him of rape in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground prior to sentencing *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hernandez-Bautista,*89 AD3d 749 [2011]; *People v Gantt,*85 AD3d 815, 816 [2011]). In any event, the plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made *(see People v Seeber,*4 NY3d 780 [2005]; *People v Fiumefreddo,*82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9 [1983]).

The defendant’s claim that he was deprived of the constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel is based, in part, on matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside the record, and thus constitutes a “ ‘mixed claim’ ” of ineffective assistance *(People v Maxwell,*89 AD3d 1108, 1109 [2011], quoting *People v Evans,*16 NY3d 571, 575 n 2 [2011], *cert denied,*565 US —, 132 S Ct 325 [2011]). In this case, it is not evident from the matter appearing on the record that the defendant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel *(cf. People v Crump,*53 NY2d 824 [1981]; *People v Brown,*45 NY2d 852 [1978]). Since the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the claim in its entirety *(see People v Freeman,*93 AD3d 805 [2012]; *People v Maxwell,*89 AD3d at 1109; *People v Rohlehr, 87*AD3d 603, 604 [2011]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.P, Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Volpe, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), each rendered October 20, 1983, the first convicting him of burglary in the third degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, and the second convicting him of burglary in the first degree (two counts), and attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentences.

Judgment rendered upon the jury verdict affirmed.

Appeal from the judgment rendered upon the plea of guilty dismissed. Said appeal was withdrawn by defendant upon oral argument.

The accomplices’ testimony in the case at bar was sufficiently corroborated by (1) expert testimony in the field of microscopic hair comparison, (2) testimony of a nonaccomplice regarding two handguns which were retrieved in his presence, after the commission of the crime, by one of the accomplices, *610and (3) testimony by a detective regarding the discovery of a ”.38 caliber projectile on the floor” of the victim’s home *(see, People v Dory,*59 NY2d 121; *People v Hudson,*51 NY2d 233; *People v Allweiss,*48 NY2d 40, 50).

Defendant argues that he was denied a fair trial because the jury viewed him in handcuffs on two occasions outside the courtroom.

This argument must be rejected. The Trial Judge gave the jury an extensive, clear curative instruction immediately upon learning of the second accidental viewing *(see, People v Gallan,*78 AD2d 904). Furthermore, the viewings of defendant in handcuffs were brief and inadvertent *(see, People v Harper,*47 NY2d 857, 858), and not egregious denials of his rights *(cf. People v Roman,*35 NY2d 978, 979).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining argument concerning the prosecutior’s cross-examination of defendant’s alibi witness and find it to be without merit *(see, People v Dawson,*50 NY2d 311, 318). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Fiber, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 135 (Monday, July 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15278]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11466]


Department of State FY 2019 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of release of the Department of State's FY 2019 Service 
Contract Inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Acting in compliance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, the Department of State is 
publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the 
FY 2019 Service Contract Inventory. The FY 2019 Service Contract 
Inventory includes the FY 2019 Planned Analysis, and the FY 2018 
Meaningful Analysis.

DATES: The inventory is available on the Department's website as of 
July 9, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlon D. Henry, Management and 
Program Analyst, A/EX/CSM, 202-485-7210, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#541c313a262d19101427203520317a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eda588839f94a0a9ad9e998c9988c38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The inventory was developed in accordance 
with guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 
Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). The Department of State 
has posted its FY 2019 Service Contract Inventory at the following 
link: https://csm.state.gov/index2.html.

Zachary A. Parker,
Director, Office of Directives Management, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-15278 Filed 7-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                         <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                       9-MOS                  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-26-1997                 DEC-27-1996 
<PERIOD-START>                       DEC-28-1997                 DEC-30-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-26-1997                 SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                     1,303                           0 
<SECURITIES>                                   0                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                             20,194                           0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                           0 
<INVENTORY>                               25,386                           0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          54,699                           0 
<PP&E>                                   126,269                           0 
<DEPRECIATION>                             9,380                           0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           181,908                           0 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     39,752                           0 
<BONDS>                                  115,632                           0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                           0 
<PREFERRED>                                    0                           0 
<COMMON>                                       1                           0 
<OTHER-SE>                                14,787                           0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             181,908                           0 
<SALES>                                  170,545                     128,052 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         170,545                     128,052 
<CGS>                                    127,730                      98,660 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            158,046                     123,276 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (94)                        153 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         8,781                       3,346 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            3,812                       1,277 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 323                           0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        3,489                         546 
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                         710 
<CHANGES>                                      0                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                               3,489                       1,256 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0                           0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0                           0 
                                                             

</TABLE>
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




NRG Energy, Inc.

CEO Compensation Table for 2010




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Title	 	 	 	 	 	2010 Annual Incentive Plan Design	 	Grants Under the Long Term Incentive Plan
	 
	 	2010 Base Salary	 	Target	 	Maximum	 	Restricted Stock	 	Non-Qualified Stock	 	Performance
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Units(2)	 	Options(3)	 	Units(4)
	David Crane,
President and Chief
Executive Officer
	 	$	1,210,000	 	 	 	100%(1)	 	 	 	200%(1)	 	 	 	65,200	 	 	 	146,800	 	 	 	67,200	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 







	 	(1)	 	For fiscal 2010, Mr. Crane’s target incentive for annual incentive compensation will
be 100% of base salary with a maximum opportunity of 200% of base salary. Incentive
components for Mr. Crane include targets based on NRG’s free cash flow and EBITDA in 2010,
as well other relevant operating performance objectives.






	 	(2)	 	Each Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) is equivalent to one share of NRG’s common stock,
par value $0.01. Mr. Crane will receive from NRG one such share of common stock for each
RSU on January 4, 2013. The number of units shown is subject to change based on the NRG
closing price on January 4, 2010.






	 	(3)	 	Non-Qualified Stock Options will vest and become exercisable as follows: 33 1/3% on
January 4, 2011, 33 1/3% on January 4, 2012 and 33 1/3% on January 4, 2013. Stock options
will expire ten years from the date of grant. The number of options shown is subject to
change based on the NRG closing price on January 4, 2010.






	 	(4)	 	Mr. Crane will be issued Performance Units (“PU’s”) by NRG under its Long-Term
Incentive Plan on January 4, 2010. Each PU will be paid out on January 4, 2013 if the
closing price of NRG’s Common Stock on January 4, 2013 (the “Measurement Price”) is equal
to or greater than 9% growth in the NRG stock price compounded annually over three years,
i.e. cost of equity at threshold, based on the closing share price on January 4, 2010 (the
“Threshold Price”). The payout for each PU will be equal to a pro-rated amount in between
one-half and one share of common stock if the Measurement Price equals or exceeds the
Threshold Price but less than 12% growth in the NRG stock price compounded annually over
three years, i.e. cost of equity at target, based on the closing share price on January 4,
2010 (the “Target Price”). The payout for each PU will be equal to a pro-rated amount in
between one and two shares of common stock, if the Measurement Price is equal to the
Target Price but less than 18% growth in the NRG stock price compounded annually over
three years, i.e. cost of equity at maximum, based on the closing share price on January
4, 2010 (the “Maximum Price”). The payout for each PU will be equal to two shares of
common stock if the Measurement Price is equal to or greater than the Maximum Price. The
number of units shown is subject to change based on the NRG closing price on January 4,
2010.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-27-2021]

On March 17, 2021, Miraclon Corporation submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 106F, in Weatherford, Oklahoma.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 17772, April 6, 2021). On July 15, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision                           ( print page 38269)                        that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: July 15, 2021.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-15410 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15
March 7, 1998

Ronald A. Rittenmeyer

Ryder TRS, Inc.

1560 Broadway, Suite 1800

Denver, Colorado 80202

Re:  Employment Agreement

Dear Ron:

I have been advised that certain provisions of my employment agreement with the
Company dated December 18, 1997 may give rise to so-called "parachute payments"
under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.

While my rights under my employment agreement are fully enforceable by me, I
hereby agree to waive all right and entitlement to the "Executive Severance" and
"Executive Stay-on Bonus" (collectively, the "Parachute Payments") to be
provided to me by the Company under the terms of my employment agreement.

My waiver of the Parachute Payments is subject to and conditioned on the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated as of March 4, 1998 by and among Ryder TRS, Inc., Questor Partners
Fund, L.P., Questor Side-By-Side Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital
Partners, L.P., BDG Corporation and Budget Group, Inc. (the "Merger Agreement").
If the Merger Agreement is terminated prior to the "Closing" (as defined in the
Merger Agreement) as provided in Section 10.1 of the Merger Agreement, my waiver
of the Parachute Payments shall be deemed rescinded, and the existing terms of
my employment agreement will continue to apply without regard to this waiver.
Except as otherwise provided herein, my waiver of the Parachute Payments shall
not affect any other benefits provided under my employment agreement.

Please acknowledge receipt and your agreement to the matters set forth in this
letter.

Very truly yours,

/s/ JAMES GREGORY

James Gregory


Accepted and Agreed to:

RYDER TRS, INC.

/s/ RONALD A. RITTENMEYER
____________________________
Ronald A. Rittenmeyer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11287

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ALBINO GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-30-2

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Albino Garza has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Garza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11287 Document: 00514207088 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017
No. 16-11287

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-11287 Document: 00514207088 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Leroy W. Van Zandt, Deceased. Virginia Van Zandt, Appellant; Jane Summers et al., Respondents. (And Three Other Proceedings.)

—Renewed motion by the appellant to (1) disqualify C. Robert Clemensen *813from acting as attorney for the estate and/or the coexecutrices of the estate of Leroy W. Van Zandt, deceased, (2) strike the affirmations of said attorney which appear in the record on appeal in the appeal from the order of the Surrogate’s Court, Rockland County, dated December 15, 1983, (3) enjoin said attorney from further participation in the appeal, (4) grant summary reversal in favor of the appellant, and (5) extend the appellant’s time to file her notice of election to take against the will of the deceased husband.

Renewed motion granted to the extent that C. Robert Clemensen is disqualified from acting as attorney for the estate in the plenary hearing or hearings to be held in the Surrogate’s Court in accordance with *Matter of Van Zandt*(117 AD2d 810). In all other respects, motion denied.

Based on our review of the record, we conclude that C. Robert Clemensen should be disqualified from acting as the attorney for the decedent’s estate in the plenary hearings to be held pursuant to the order of this court made on the companion appeals decided herewith, which hearings will resolve, *inter alia,*the petitioner’s allegations that she was fraudulently induced into executing a prenuptial agreement waiving her statutory right of election. Clemensen’s conflict of interest is based upon the fact that he, acting as the decedent’s attorney, drafted the subject prenuptial agreement as well as the decedent’s last will and testament and, in all likelihood, will be called as a witness at the hearing or hearings. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.
esp_ex10-3.htm




LEASE AGREEMENT









This Commercial lease Agreement ("lease") is made and effective July 01, 2009, by and between Global Alternative Capital Group, LLC ("landlord") and Euro Solar Parks, Inc. ('Tenant").





Landlord is the owner of land and improvements commonly known and numbered as 81 Elmwood Avenue, Ho-Ho-Kus, NJ 07423. Landlord makes available for lease a portion of the Office designated as 81 Elmwood Avenue (the "leased Premises").





Landlord desires to lease the leased Premises to Tenant, and Tenant desires to lease the Leased Premises from landlord for the term, at the rental and upon the covenants, conditions and provisions herein set forth.





THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein, contained and other good and valuable consideration, it is agreed:





1. Term.





A. Landlord hereby leases the leased Premises to Tenant, and Tenant hereby leases the same from landlord, beginning July 01, 2009 and ending upon notification ("unlimited term").





B. Both the parties, either Landlord or Tenant, may terminate this lease agreement at their sole discretion at any time. If either landlord or Tenant wish to terminate this lease agreement, each party shall exercise such termination, if at all, by giving written notice to the counter party not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date of
termination.





2. Rental.





A. Tenant shall pay to landlord rental of USD 300 (three hundred United States Dollars) per month, payable in installments of a three month basis. Each installment payment shall be due in advance on the first day of each three-month-period during the lease term to Landlord at 81 Elmwood Avenue, Ho-Ho-Kus, NJ 07423.





















  



1







  





B. The parties agree that no security deposit is required.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has caused this lease agreement, consisting of two (2) pages, to be executed in his individual or its corporate name, on its behalf, be its proper officers, duly authorized, on the day and date set forth above.





Global Alternative Capital Group, LLC

81 Elmwood Avenue, Ho-Ho-Kus, NJ 07423





Euro Solar Parks, Inc.

2533 N. Carson Street, Suite, H-302, Carson City, NV 89706





Dimitrios Argyros

Officer/Director





/s/ Dimitrios Argyros

























































  



2
#### Nancy Bravchok, Doing Business as Bear Necessities 3902 Long Beach Road, Inc., Petitioner, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State Liquor Authority, dated November 13, 1984, which, after a hearing, adjudged petitioner to have violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 (5) and suspended petitioner’s liquor license for a period of 10 days.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs.

We find substantial evidence in the record to support determination that petitioner violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 (5) by permitting the after-hours consumption of alcohol on the licensed premises *(see, Matter of Elmarth Bar & Grill v State Liq. Auth.,*53 NY2d 859). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Fiber, JJ., concur.