alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Yaterra Ventures Corp. - Exhibit 10.4






AMENDMENT AGREEMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 27th day of October,
2009.

BETWEEN:

GEOFFREY GOODALL an
individual having 
an address at Unit 154, 101 –
1001 West Broadway
Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 4E4

(the “Optionor”)

OF THE FIRST PART 

AND: 

YATERRA VENTURES CORP.

a Nevada corporation having an address at 
1200 Dupont Street,
Suite 2J, Bellingham, WA 98225

(the “Optionee”)

OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS:

	A. 	
      The Optionor and the Optionee entered into an option
      agreement dated July 14, 2009 with respect to a mineral claim referred to
      as the “Frances Property” located in the Vancouver Mining District of
      British Columbia, Canada (the “Option Agreement”).

	 	 
	B. 	
      Under the terms of the Option Agreement, the Optionee was
      required to pay $2,000 CDN to the Optionor by October 14, 2009 (the
      “Payment”).

	 	 
	C. 	
      The Optionor has agreed to extend the due date of the
      Payment on the terms and condtions hereinafter set
forth.



NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in
consideration of the sum of $10.00 now paid by the Optionee to the Optionor (the
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged), the parties agree as follows:

	1. 	
      The Optionee shall pay $500 CDN to the Optionor on
      execution of this Agreement.

	 	 
	2. 	
      Section 2.1(a)(ii)(A) of the Option Agreement is hereby
      deleted and replaced with the following:



“2.1(a)(ii)(A) $1,500 CDN on or before
December 11, 2009;”

	3. 	
      The parties confirm that the terms, covenants and
      conditions of the Option Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and
      effect, except as modified by this Agreement.

	 	 
	4. 	
      This Agreement has been prepared by O’Neill Law Group
      PLLC acting solely on behalf of the Optionor and the Optionee acknowledges
      that it has been advised to obtain independent legal advice.

	 	 
	5. 	
      Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the
      provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the
      successors, assigns, heirs, executors and administrators of the parties
      hereto.








	6. 	
      This Agreement constitutes the full and entire
      understanding and agreement between the parties with regard to the subject
      hereof.

	 	 
	7. 	
      This Agreement may be executed in two or more
      counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of
      which, when taken together, shall constitute but one instrument, and shall
      become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each
      party hereto and delivered to the other parties.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first above written

SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED GEOFFREY GOODALL in the
presence of:

	  	 	/s/ Geoffrey Goodall 
	Signature of Witness 	 	
	 	 	GEOFFREY GOODALL
    
	 	 	 
	Name of Witness 	 	  
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Address 	 	  


YATERRA VENTURES CORP. by its authorized signatory:

	/s/ Jarrett Bousquet 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Authorized Signatory
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SERGIO RENE DE JESUS-SANCHEZ,

AKA Sergio De Jesus Sanchez, AKA

Sergio Sanchez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71955

Agency No. A201-034-208

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 16, 2015** 

San Francisco California

Before: NOONAN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and ADELMAN, District

Judge.*** 

FILED

JAN 23 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation.
Sergio Rene De Jesus-Sanchez petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ decision denying withholding of removal and protection

under the Convention Against Torture. We dismiss in part and deny in part.

We lack jurisdiction to review an order of removal against an alien

removable for having committed an aggravated felony, except over constitutional

or legal claims or when denial of relief is on the merits of the claim. U.S.C. §

1252(a)(2)(C), (D); Perez-Palafox v. Holder, 744 F.3d 1138, 1144 (9th Cir. 2014). 

To the extent De Jesus-Sanchez disputes the weight given to each piece of

evidence about the loaded gun and the non-violent nature of his crime, we dismiss

his challenge to the BIA’s conclusion that he committed a particularly serious

crime and was ineligible for withholding of removal. To the extent De JesusSanchez raises legal challenges to the BIA’s conclusion, his claims lack merit. The

BIA relied on reliable evidence and considered relevant factors.

We have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of deferral of removal under

the Convention Against Torture because it was a decision on the merits. See

Lemus-Galvan v. Mukasey, 518 F.3d 1081, 1083 (9th Cir. 2008). Substantial

evidence supported the BIA’s denial. Although De Jesus-Sanchez presented

evidence that he is at risk of being attacked upon return to Mexico, this evidence

did not compel a finding that he more likely than not would be tortured. Further,

2
the evidence did not suggest De Jesus-Sanchez would be tortured “by or at the

instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official.” See

Kalmathas v. INS, 251 F.3d 1279, 1282-83 (9th Cir. 2001).

Petition DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Hill, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 712]

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered November 21, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Present — Scudder, PJ., Fahey, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - [Docket No. USCG-2020-0278]

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Coast Guard published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 15, 2021, concerning a Notice of availability of draft report and public meeting; request for comments for the Port Access Route Study: Northern New York Bight. The document contained incorrect date for the public meeting.                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective July 21, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have questions on this notice, contact Mr. Craig Lapiejko, Waterways Management at First Coast Guard District, telephone (617) 223-8351, email                         *craig.d.lapiejko@uscg.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The document published on July 15, 2021, at 86 FR 37339, contained incorrect meeting date in the                     **DATES**                     and                     **ADDRESSES**                     sections. The correct date for the meeting is July 30, 2021. The notice incorrectly noted the meeting would be July 30, 2020.                

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of July 15, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-14757, beginning on page 37339, the following corrections are made:                

                    1. On page 37339, in the second column, in the                     **DATES**                     section, remove the text, “July 30, 2020” and insert, in its place, the text “July 30, 2021”.                

                    2. On page 37339 in the second column, in the                     **ADDRESSES**                     section, remove the text, “July 30, 2020” and insert, in its place, the text “July 30, 2021”.                

Dated: July 15, 2021.

M.T. Cunningham,

Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-15455 Filed 7-20-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

         Each of the undersigned directors and officers of Oak Hill Financial,
Inc. (the "Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby appoints John D.
Kidd or H. Grant Stephenson, or either of them, as his attorney-in-fact to sign,
in his name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report") for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998, and likewise to sign and file any amendments, including
post-effective amendments, to the Annual Report, hereby granting unto such
attorneys and each of them full power and authority to do and perform in the
name and on behalf off the undersigned, and in any and all such capacities,
every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done in and about the premises as
fully as the undersigned could or might do in person, hereby granting to such
attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that such attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of
Attorney in counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 26, 1998.


    SIGNATURE                               TITLE

/s/John D. Kidd                     President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
----------------------------        (Principal Executive Officer)
   John D. Kidd                     

/s/Evan E. Davis
----------------------------        Chairman of the Board
   Evan E. Davis            

/s/Richard P. LeGrand
----------------------------        Executive Vice President and Director
   Richard P. LeGrand       

/s/H. Tim Bichsel                   Secretary and Treasurer
----------------------------        (Principal Accounting Officer)
   H. Tim Bichsel           

/s/Barry M. Dorsey
----------------------------
  Barry M. Dorsey                   Director

/s/Rick A. McNelly
----------------------------
   Rick A. McNelly                  Director

/s/Donald R. Seigneur
----------------------------
   Donald R. Seigneur               Director

/s/H. Grant Stephenson
----------------------------
  H. Grant Stephenson               Director

/s/C. Clayton Johnson
----------------------------
  C. Clayton Johnson                Director

/s/D. Bruce Knox
----------------------------
   D. Bruce Knox                    Director
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 10-1648

JUANITA SÁNCHEZ, on behalf of minor child D.R.-S.;

7,124 ADDITIONAL PLAINTIFFS FOUND IN ATTACHMENT A,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on February 14, 2012, is

amended as follows:

On p. 51, line 17: "AFTWF" should read "AFWTF"
EXHIBIT 99.1 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinewire Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick Ward, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Patrick Ward

___________________________

Patrick Ward

Principal Executive Officer

March 31, 2003
Amend #2, Supplemental 401(k)  Plan


 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO 
 TO THE 
 REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 SUPPLEMENTAL 401(K) PLAN 
 Amended and Restated as of April 1, 2008
(the “Plan”) 
 Regions Financial Corporation (the “Company”), hereby amends the Plan as follows:

 1. Effective January 1, 2010, delete Section 4.1(b) in its entirety and substitute in lieu thereof the following:

  

	 	(b)	Effectiveness of Salary Reduction Agreement. A Participant’s supplemental salary reduction agreement shall take effect and amounts specified in the
supplemental salary reduction agreement shall begin to be credited to such Participant’s Salary Reduction Contributions Account at such time as the Participant has made the maximum pre-tax elective deferrals to the Regions 401(k) Plan allowed
by Code Section 402(g) or by the provisions of the Regions 401(k) Plan. 

 2. Effective January 1, 2010,
delete Section 4.2(f) in its entirety and substitute in lieu thereof the following: 
  

	 	(f)	Temporary Suspension of Employer Matching Contributions. Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) above, no matching contributions shall be credited
with respect to pre-tax elective deferrals or salary reduction contributions made to the Regions 401(k) Plan for pay periods that begin after March 31, 2009 and prior to January 1, 2010. 

 3. Effective January 1, 2010, delete Section 4.3(e) in its entirety and substitute in lieu thereof the following: 
  

	 	(e)	Temporary Suspension of Employer Contributions. Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) above, no employer contributions shall be made or credited
after March 31, 2009 and prior to January 1, 2010. 

 4. All of the other terms, provisions and
conditions of the Plan not herein amended shall remain in full force and effect. 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Regions Financial Corporation on behalf of itself and all participating
Employers has caused this Amendment Number Two to be executed on this 16th day of December, 2009 by its duly authorized officers, effective as provided herein. 
  

			
	 REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

		
	By:	 	 /s/ David B. Edmonds

		 	David B. Edmonds
		 	Senior Executive Vice President
# C_2019399EN.01002902.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 September 2019 — Criminal proceedings against DK

(Case C-653/19)

(2019/C 399/34)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Party to the main proceedings

DK

Question referred

Is a national law that, during the trial stage of criminal proceedings, requires a change in circumstances as a condition for granting the defence's application for the release of the accused person from detention, consistent with Article 6 and recital 22 of Directive 2016/343 (1) and with Articles 6 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?

---

(1)  Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ 2016 L 65, p. 1).

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-51273 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ENRIQUE ALEJO-ZUNIGA, 

also known as Enrique Bautista Zuniga,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-03-CR-201-ALL-SS

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Enrique Alejo-Zuniga has

filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Alejo-Zuniga has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### In the Matter of Yohannan Kunju, Appellant-Respondent, v MTA et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[942 NYS2d 350]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert E. Torres, J.), entered on or about June 20, 2011, which denied the petition to vacate an arbitration award, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 75, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s application to vacate the arbitration award was made more than 90 days after the award was delivered to him and is therefore untimely *(see*CPLR 7511 [a]; *Werner Enters. Co. v New York City Law Dept.,*281 AD2d 253 [2001]). In any event, while CPLR article 75 provides a mechanism by which a party may obtain judicial confirmation of an arbitration award, the failure to have an award confirmed is not a ground for vacating the award *(see*CPLR 7510; 7511 [b] [1]).

Petitioner now claims that he seeks vacatur under CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (iv). This argument is unavailing as well as unpreserved, since subparagraph (iv) is “failure to follow the procedure of this article, unless the party applying to vacate the award continued with the arbitration with notice of the defect and without objection.” Petitioner participated in the arbitration without objection as to the procedure employed. Concur— Gonzalez, EJ., Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32



Certification

Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of CuraGen Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: November 10, 2003 |  | By: /s/  Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.                                                      
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.                                                               
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board (principal executive officer)
|                        





|Dated: November 10, 2003 |  | By: /s/  David M. Wurzer                                                                                    
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | David M. Wurzer                                                                                             
|                         |  | Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer)
|                        



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be

retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tornado Gold International Corp. a
Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December
31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), George J. Drazenovic, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tornado Gold International Corp., and will be retained by Tornado
Gold International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



/s/ George J. Drazenovic
--------------------------
George J. Drazenovic
Chief Financial Officer
April 10, 2006