United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 22-2272

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jeremiah James Lynch

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ 

Submitted: January 11, 2023

Filed: July 13, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM. 

In 2004, Jeremiah Lynch pleaded guilty to drug and firearm charges. After 

serving his prison sentence, he began his first term of supervised release. In 2018, 

Lynch’s supervised release was revoked, and he was ordered to serve 21 months in 

prison, followed by a 2-year term of supervised release. Lynch’s second term of 
-2- 

supervised release began in April 2021. On June 2, 2022, the district court1 again 

revoked Lynch’s supervised release and imposed a 51-month sentence and an 

additional 5-year term of supervised release. Lynch appeals. 

I. 

On May 3, 2022, Lynch’s wife Alyssa Lynch (Alyssa) contacted the 

Davenport Police Department to report that Lynch had assaulted her the night before. 

Officer Justin Adams responded and spoke with Alyssa in person. According to 

Officer Adams, Alyssa told him that she and Lynch got into a verbal argument that 

turned physical when Lynch grabbed her, hit her arms, and “started to strangle her.” 

On May 6, 2022, a Temporary Protective Order for domestic abuse was filed against 

Lynch. Later that same day, Lynch violated the order and was arrested. 

Shortly thereafter, the United States probation office petitioned for revocation 

of Lynch’s supervised release, alleging two violations: (1) his May 6 arrest (a Grade 

C violation); and (2) commission of the state law offense of domestic assault by 

strangulation2 on May 2 (a Grade A violation). See United States Sentencing 

Guidelines § 7B1.1(a) (describing the three grades of supervised release violations); 

id. § 7B1.4(a) (specifying the range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation 

based on the grade of the violation).

Lynch contested the violations, and the district court held an evidentiary 

hearing. At the hearing, Officer Adams testified about his conversation with Alyssa 

on May 3. He also described his conversation with Alyssa’s daughter, K.C., who 

1

The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa. 

2

The petition alleged “Domestic Assault/Impeding Blood/AirflowStrangulation with Injury,” which we shorthand here as domestic assault by 

strangulation. See Iowa Code § 708.2A(5). Lynch was not charged with domestic 

assault in state court. 
-3- 

told him that she heard her mother and Lynch arguing the night of the May 2 assault. 

According to Officer Adams, K.C. said that her mother had yelled for her to call the 

police. K.C. then saw Lynch “attempting to strangle her mother.” The government 

also introduced photographs of Alyssa taken after Officer Adams arrived. The 

photos depicted red marks and bruises at various spots on Alyssa’s upper chest, neck,

and arm. And Lynch’s supervising probation officer, Kristin Schrems, testified 

about a text she received from Alyssa on May 5. The text read: “Hey Kristin, this is 

Jeremiah’s wife, Alyssa. I just want to let you know a warrant has been issued for 

his arrest. He seriously assaulted me in front of our children. He could have killed 

me. He’s been messing up REAL bad lately with everything.” 

Alyssa also testified. She explained that she and Lynch were “just tussling” 

the night of May 2, that “[h]e didn’t beat [her] up,” and that “[h]e didn’t hit [her].” 

She also said that Lynch “did not try to choke [her].” Alyssa conceded she told law 

enforcement otherwise, but insisted she only did so to get a protection order against 

Lynch. She said she “exaggerated everything that happened” that night. Alyssa also 

denied sustaining bruises or having any difficulty breathing as a result of her 

altercation with Lynch. As to the text message to Officer Schrems, Alyssa described 

that, too, as an effort to get Lynch “in trouble” and “to make him out as a bad guy.”

At the conclusion of the hearing, the district court found by a preponderance 

of the evidence that Lynch had committed both alleged violations. The more serious 

of the two violations—domestic assault by strangulation—was a Grade A violation, 

see USSG § 7B1.1(a)(1), which resulted in an advisory Guidelines range of 51–63 

months. See id. § 7B1.1(b) (“Where there is more than one violation of the 

conditions of supervision, . . . the grade of the violation is determined by the violation 

having the most serious grade.”). The district court imposed a 51-month sentence, 

with a 5-year term of supervised release to follow. 
-4- 

II. 

On appeal, Lynch does not contest that he violated the terms of his supervised 

release. Rather, he challenges the classification of his state offense violation, 

arguing that the government merely established that his May 2 conduct constituted 

a Grade C—not a Grade A—violation for purposes of his advisory Guidelines range. 

We review the district court’s “underlying fact-finding—whether [Lynch] violated 

his supervised release by committing a new state crime—for clear error.” United 

States v. Mitchell, 2 F.4th 786, 789 (8th Cir. 2021) (internal citation omitted). To 

the extent the district court makes credibility determinations, they are “almost never 

clear error given that court’s comparative advantage at evaluating credibility.” 

United States v. Salsberry, 825 F.3d 499, 501 (8th Cir. 2016) (quoting United States 

v. Sandoval-Sianuqui, 632 F.3d 438, 443 (8th Cir. 2011)). 

Lynch argues the district court erred by finding that there was sufficient 

evidence he committed the offense of domestic assault by strangulation. Under 

Iowa law, a defendant commits domestic assault by strangulation “by knowingly 

impeding the normal breathing or circulation of the blood of another by applying 

pressure to the throat or neck of the other person or by obstructing the nose or mouth 

of the other person, and causing bodily injury.” Iowa Code § 708.2A(5) (2017). 

Domestic assault by strangulation is a felony punishable by a term of imprisonment 

of no more than five years. See id. §§ 708.2A(5), 902.9(1)(e). In contrast, a 

domestic abuse assault that only “causes bodily injury or mental illness” is a “serious 

misdemeanor” punishable by up to one year of imprisonment. See id. §§ 

708.2A(2)(b), 903.1(1)(b). Therefore, the felony offense of domestic assault by 

strangulation is a Grade A violation under the Guidelines, whereas the serious

misdemeanor offense of domestic abuse assault is a Grade C violation. See USSG

§ 7B1.1(a)(1)(A)(i) (providing in relevant part that Grade A violations include 

conduct constituting a state offense “punishable by a term of imprisonment 

exceeding one year that . . . is a crime of violence”); id. § 7B1.1(a)(3)(A) (providing 

in relevant part that Grade C violations include conduct constituting a state offense 

“punishable by a term of imprisonment of one year or less”). 
-5- 

The difference between these two statutory provisions is significant for 

purposes of calculating Lynch’s advisory Guidelines range. If Lynch’s conduct 

constituted a Grade C rather than a Grade A violation, as he argues, his advisory 

Guidelines range would have been 8–14 months, rather than 51–63 months. See

USSG §§ 7B1.1(b), 7B1.4(a). 

The district court directly addressed Lynch’s argument—the same one he 

raises on appeal—that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he “knowingly 

imped[ed Alyssa’s] normal breathing or circulation of the blood.” 3

 See Iowa Code 

§ 708.2A(5). The district court specifically found that “to leave bruises of that nature 

across that extensive portion of [Alyssa’s] neck, [Lynch] had to have impeded her

ability to breathe.” The court said its conclusion was further supported by Officer 

Adams’ testimony that both Alyssa and K.C. used the word “strangle” when 

describing the events of May 2, as well as by the text Alyssa sent to Officer Schrems

stating, “He could have killed me.” Alyssa’s testimony was to the contrary, but the 

district court declined to credit it, finding it “grossly inconsistent with what [Alyssa]

said at the time the injuries happened” and “[not] at all believable.” 

Lynch asserts in response that the evidence showed, at most, that he attempted

to strangle Alyssa, not that he succeeded in “impeding [her] normal breathing or 

circulation of blood.” Lynch points out that Alyssa said he “started to strangle her.” 

And K.C. said she saw him “attempting to strangle” Alyssa. But even if Iowa Code

§ 708.2A(5) does not encompass attempts—a proposition on which we take no 

position—the district court found that Lynch did, in fact, impede Alyssa’s breathing 

during the domestic assault. Given the testimonial and photographic evidence 

presented at the hearing, we see no clear error in the district court’s finding, by a 

preponderance of the evidence, that Lynch’s conduct on May 2 amounted to a 

domestic assault by strangulation. 

3

Lynch does not contest that he “appl[ied] pressure to the throat or neck” of 

Alyssa. He argues only that he did not “knowingly imped[e] [Alyssa’s] normal 

breathing or circulation of [her] blood.” 
-6- 

III. 

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________