alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11




LIVEREEL MEDIA CORPORATION
 
 CODE OF ETHICS
 
 FOR
 
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR CONTROLLER AND PERSONS PERFORMING SIMILAR FUNCTIONS
 
 
 General Philosophy
 
 The honesty, integrity and sound judgment of LiveReel Media Corporation (“LiveReel ” or the “Company”) Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Controller and persons performing similar functions (collectively the “Principal Officers”) is fundamental to our reputation and success.  The professional and ethical conduct of the Principal Officers is essential to the proper functioning and success of LiveReel.
 
 Applicability
 
 This Code of Ethics shall apply to LiveReel’s Principal Officers.
 
 Standards of Conduct
 
 To the best of their knowledge and ability, the Principal Officers shall:
 
 ·
act with honesty and integrity, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
 
 ·
provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that LiveReel files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) and in other public communications made by LiveReel;
 
 ·
comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
 
 ·
promote the prompt internal reporting of violations of this Code of Ethics to LiveReel’s board of directors and outside legal counsel;
 
 ·
respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of employment;
 
 ·
maintain the skills necessary and relevant to LiveReel’s needs; and
 
 ·
proactively promote ethical and honest behavior among employees of LiveReel and its subsidiary.
 
 All Principal Officers are expected to adhere to the LiveReel Code of Ethics.  Any violation of this Code of Ethics will be subject to appropriate discipline, up to and including dismissal from the Company and prosecution under the law.  The board of directors shall have responsibility for administration of this Code of Ethics and shall have the sole and absolute discretionary authority to approve any deviation or waiver from this Code of Ethics for Principal Officers.  In the event that a waiver of, modification of and/or change to this Code of Ethics is approved and granted, then the notice of the waiver, modification, and/or change shall be disclosed as may be required by SEC rules or the rules of any exchange on which the securities of the Company are then trading.
#### Jeffrey R. Balancio, Respondent, v American Optical Corporation, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for abusive discharge from an at-will employment, prima facie tort, and breach of contractual rights to severance and incentive bonus pay, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), entered October 28, 1983, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint for plaintiff’s failure to file a note of issue within 90 days of its demand pursuant to CPLR 3216.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, with costs, defendant’s motion to dismiss granted, and plaintiff’s complaint dismissed.

By service of summons and complaint, verified on November 30,1979, plaintiff commenced this action seeking the recovery of damages, which he alleged stemmed from his wrongful discharge as an employee of defendant American Optical Corporation. Defendant answered, on or about February 21,1980, denying for the most part plaintiff’s allegations.

Thereafter, pretrial discovery commenced which included the taking of depositions. A substantial period of inactivity ensued, however, and on or about August 9, 1982, plaintiff was served with a “Demand To File Note of Issue”, which stated that “[u]pon plaintiff’s default in complying with this demand within 90 days after the service thereof, Defendant will move for a dismissal of the complaint for unreasonably neglecting to proceed in the action, based upon such default”.' Apparently, plaintiff took no action, and by notice of motion dated February 7, 1983, defendant moved for an order dismissing the complaint *203“for unreasonable neglect to proceed”. The court denied the motion because the plaintiff demonstrated a “justifiable excuse for the delay and a good and meritorious cause of action”.

CPLR 3216 (e) in relevant part provides that “In the event that the party upon whom is served [a written demand to serve and file a note of issue within 90 days after receipt of such demand] fails to serve and file a note of issue within such ninety day period, the court may * * * grant [a motion to dismiss] unless the said party shows justifiable excuse for the delay and a good and meritorious cause of action.”

Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that plaintiff failed to establish a “justifiable excuse for the delay” of some six months in responding to defendant’s demand. Consequently, Special Term’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss was error and the action must be dismissed *(see, Caton v Redmond,*82 AD2d 937, *appeal dismissed*56 NY2d 648).

In view of our disposition we need not pass on the remaining contentions. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs BARC Public Field Day





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Field Day 2005headline bar Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Public Field Day Photo GalleryPhoto Galleries From Other Years2010 | 2007 | **2005**2004 | 2003 | 20021999-01Gallery HomeField Day Information


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2019413EN.01001901.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/19

---

Request for an opinion submitted by the European Parliament pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU

(Opinion 1/19)

(2019/C 413/21)

Language of the case: all the official languages

Applicant

European Parliament (represented by: D. Warin, O. Hrstková Šolcová, A. Neergaard, agents, acting as Agents)

Questions submitted to the Court

| — | Do Articles 82(2) and 84 TFEU constitute appropriate legal bases for the act of the Council relating to the conclusion, in the name of the European Union, of the Istanbul Convention, or must that act be based on Articles 78(2), 82(2) and 83(1) TFEU, and is it necessary or possible to separate the decisions concerning the signature and the conclusion of the convention as a consequence of that choice of legal basis? |
| --- | --- |

—

Do Articles 82(2) and 84 TFEU constitute appropriate legal bases for the act of the Council relating to the conclusion, in the name of the European Union, of the Istanbul Convention, or must that act be based on Articles 78(2), 82(2) and 83(1) TFEU, and is it necessary or possible to separate the decisions concerning the signature and the conclusion of the convention as a consequence of that choice of legal basis?

| — | Is the conclusion by the European Union of the Istanbul Convention, in accordance with Article 218(6) TFEU, compatible with the Treaties in the absence of mutual agreement between all the Member States concerning their consent to be bound by that convention? |
| --- | --- |

—

Is the conclusion by the European Union of the Istanbul Convention, in accordance with Article 218(6) TFEU, compatible with the Treaties in the absence of mutual agreement between all the Member States concerning their consent to be bound by that convention?

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15384]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 4, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The Richard R. Drake Family Trust--B, Radcliffe, Iowa; Cynthia 
A. Shirar, Marshalltown, Iowa; Edwin A. Drake, West Des Moines, Iowa; 
and Bryan S. Drake, Radcliffe, Iowa; all individually and as co-
trustees; to join the Drake Family Control Group, a group acting in 
concert, to retain voting shares of Drake Holding Company, and 
indirectly retain voting shares of Security State Bank, both of 
Radcliffe, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 15, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-15384 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### In re RAPID-TRANSIT RY. CO. In the matter of the application of the Syracuse Rapid-Transit Railway Company for the appointment of commissioners to determine whether a street surface railroad ought to be constructed and operated in Walnut avenue, between East Genesee street and University Place, in the city of Syracuse, Onondaga county, N. Y.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

No opinion. Motion to confirm report of the commissioners granted, and papers directed to be filed in Onondaga county.
Exhibit 32.2

NANOGEN, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Nanogen Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Robert Saltmarsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |  |  |                                         
|------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|             |  |  |  |                                         
|             |  | 
|May 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ ROBERT SALTMARSH                    
|             |  |  |  | Robert Saltmarsh Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Nicholas Financial, Inc. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-143245) on Form S-8 pertaining to the Nicholas Financial, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan of our reports dated June 14, 2007, with respectto the consolidated financial statements of Nicholas Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (which expressed an unqualified opinion and contain an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment, effective April 1, 2006) and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, (which expressed an opinion thatNicholas Financial, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007 because of the effect of material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatoryparagraph that describes material weaknesses) included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC 

Atlanta, Georgia 

June 14, 2007
#### HYDE, Appellant, v. FLEISHMANN REALTY CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by E. Belcher Hyde against the Fleishmann Realty Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain a judgment that the delivery of the atlas was not -within a reasonable time after the making of the contract.
Exhibit 10.14


 


NORTHERN
TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


 


DESCRIPTION
OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


COMPENSATION
ARRANGEMENTS


 


The following is a description of oral compensation
arrangements between Northern Technologies International Corporation and each
of the executive officers of NTIC as of August 31, 2009:


 


	
  Name of

  Executive

  Officer

  	
   

  	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  Base

  Salary

  	
   

  	
  Bonus

  Arrangements

  	
   

  	
  Stock

  Options

  	
   

  	
  Other

  
	
  G. Patrick Lynch

  	
   

  	
  President and Chief
  Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $189,000 per
  year.  See
  footnote (1) below

  	
   

  	
  See footnote
  (2) below

  	
   

  	
  Stock options to
  purchase shares of NTIC common stock are granted from time to time in the
  sole discretion of the NTIC Board of Directors.

  	
   

  	
  Under NTIC’s 401(k) Plan, participants,
  including executive officers, may voluntarily request that NTIC reduce
  pre-tax compensation by up to 15% (subject to certain special limitations)
  and contribute such amounts to a trust. NTIC contributed an amount equal to
  3.5% of the amount that each participant contributed under this plan. (3)

   

  Executive officers receive
  other benefits received by other NTIC employees, including health, dental and
  life insurance benefits.

  
	
  Matthew C. Wolsfeld

  	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer
  and Secretary

  	
   

  	
  $139,500 per
  year.  See
  footnote (1) below

  	
   

  	
  See footnote
  (2) below

  	
   

  	
  See above

  	
   

  	
  See above

  



 






(1)           Annual base salaries for NTIC’s executive
officers are determined each year by NTIC’s Board of Directors, upon
recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board.  The salaries listed in the table are the base
salaries for as of August 31, 2009. 
In January 2009, both Mr. Lynch and Mr. Wolsfeld took
salary cuts of 15% to from $221,000 to $189,000 and $163,000 to $139,500,
respectively.


 


(2)           Annual performance bonuses for NTIC’s
executive officers are determined each year by NTIC’s Board of Directors, upon
recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board.   For fiscal 2010 as in past years, the total
amount available under the bonus plan will be up to 25% of NTIC’s earnings
before interest, taxes and other income (EBITOI) and will be $0 if EBITOI, as
adjusted to take into account amounts to be paid under the bonus plan, fall
below 70% of target EBITOI.  The payment
of bonuses under the plan are purely discretionary and will be paid to
executive officer participants in both cash and stock, the exact amount and
percentages of which will be determined by the Board of Directors, upon
recommendation of the Compensation Committee.


 


(3)           NTIC’s matching contributions were
suspended for all employees starting January 2009.


 


1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, David W. Hitchcock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 26, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    DAVID W. HITCHCOCK                 
|                         |  |  |  | David W. Hitchcock Chief Financial Officer

The above certification is
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
# L_2008037EN.01001001.xml

| 12.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 37/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 37/10

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 74/2008 of 20 December 2007 on the establishment of the ‘ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking’ to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 30 of 4 February 2008
  )

On page 58, in the signature formula:

for:

‘Done at Brussels, 20 December 2008.’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 20 December 2007.’

---
#### RUYL, Respondent, v. KAHLER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by James P. Ruyl against William T.. H. Kahler.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
**EXHIBIT
32.3**
 
 Written
Statement of Principal Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 as
Adopted by
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. von
Gnechten, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:
 
 (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition as of December 31, 2004 and results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company and its
subsidiaries.
 
 ****Date: March 30,
2005
    By:
    /s/ Richard A. von
      GnechtenName: Richard A. von GnechtenTitle:  Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.