alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetic Resources Unit (PGRU): Geneva, NY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Diversity Collections
                        Apple
                                    Brassica
                                    Buckwheat
                                    Celery
                                    Grape
                                    Hemp
                                    Onion
                                    Radish
                                    Squash
                                    Tart Cherry
                                    Tomato
                                    Other Seed CropsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Geneva, New York Plant Genetic Resources Unit (PGRU) Docs HDM Versioning TC_protocol







TC-protocolheadline bar Tissue culture protocol for hemp; developed by Faith Sparks. Protocol Figures TC Worksheet


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### PLATT v. PLATT.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

October 19, 1907.)

Divobce—Issues bob Jury.

There is no authority for submitting to a jury the issue in a divorce suit as to whether the parties were married at a certain time and place; such submission being proper in such a suit only as to the issue of adultery.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 17, Divorce, § 484.]

Action by Mae C. Wood Platt against Thomas C. Platt for divorce. Plaintiff moves for an order framing issues and directing a trial thereof by a jury. Motion denied.

Joseph Day Lee, for the motion.

O’Brien, Boardman, Platt & Dunning (John B. Stanchfield, of counsel), opposed.

SEABURY, J.

The only issue raised by the pleadings in this action is whether the “plaintiff was married to defendant on or about November 9, 1901, at the Fifth Avenue Hotel, in the city and county of New York.” There is no authority for the submission of this issue to a jury upon this motion, and the practice of submitting any issue.other than that of adultery to a jury in an action of this char*1096acter has been distinctly disapproved by the Appellate Division of this department. Bush v. Bush, 103 App. Div. 588, 93 N. Y. Supp. 159; Packard v. Packard, 88 App. Div. 339, 84 N. Y. Supp. 1090; Wilcox v. Wilcox, 116 App. Div. 423, 101 N. Y. Supp. 828.

Motion denied. Settle order on notice.
NO. 01-15-00018-CR

JOHN ROBERT COULTER § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS VS. § FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF TEXAS § HOUSTON, TEXAS

STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS: On October 13, 2015, the Court abated the appeal in this cause and ordered the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether a video recording of the child complainant is missing from the appellate r ecord and to determin e whether the record is complete. The Court directed the trial court to file its findings and recommendations within 25 days of the date of the order, which was November 7, 2015. The trial court held an evidentiary h earing on October 29, 2015. The court then ordered the court reporter to pr ovide the reporter’s record of the hearing to the parties, ordered the parties to propose findings of fact based on the record, and ordered a hearing on the proposed findings with argument of counsel within ten days of the receipt of the record. The court reporter provided the parties with the reporter’s record on November

1 ACCEPTED 01-15-00018-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/17/2015 4:44:36 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK4, 2015. The final hearing on abatement and remand is set fo r Thursday, November 19, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. The State believes the court reporter w ill be able to produce the reporter’s record of this final hearing in about a week; however, Thursday, November 26, 2015, is the nation’s Thanksgiving holiday and Fort Bend County is also closed the following day. WEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State asks this Court to grant an extension of time to file the reporter’s and clerk’s records on the abatement of this cause on or before December 4, 2015. Respectfully submitted, John F. Healey, Jr. SBOT # 09328300 District Attorney, 268th Judicial District Fort Bend County, Texas /s/ Gail Kikawa McConnell Gail Kikawa McConnell SBOT # 11395400 Assistant District Attorney 301 Jackson Street, Room 101 Fort Bend County, Texas 77469 (281) 238-3205/(281) 238-3340 (fax) Gail.McConnell@fortbendcountytx.gov

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a c opy of the foregoing State's motion was served by eservice on November 17, 2015, on Mr. James Bennett, <Jamesmbennett@sbcglobal.net>. /s/ Gail Kikawa McConnell Gail Kikawa McConnell

3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eliazar MATUS-BOJORQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10192.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed July 7, 2011.

Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Thomas E. Higgins, Esquire, Law Offices of Thomas E. Higgins Jr., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Eliazar Matus-Bojorquez, pro se.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Eliazar Matus-Bojorquez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and the 30-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Matus-Bojorquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2390 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2390

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the exclusion 
from gross income of parking and transportation fringe benefits and to 
provide for a common cost-of-living adjustment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2005

Mr. McGovern (for himself and Mr. Shays) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition 
to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the exclusion 
from gross income of parking and transportation fringe benefits and to 
provide for a common cost-of-living adjustment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commuter Benefits Equity Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. UNIFORM DOLLAR LIMITATION FOR ALL TYPES OF TRANSPORTATION 
              FRINGE BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 132(f)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to limitation on exclusion) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$100'' in subparagraph (A) and inserting 
        ``$200'', and
            (2) by striking ``$175'' in subparagraph (B) and inserting 
        ``$200''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment Conforming Amendments.--Subparagraph (A) 
of section 132(f)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
inflation adjustment) is amended--
            (1) by striking the last sentence,
            (2) by striking ``1999'' and inserting ``2008'', and
            (3) by striking ``1998'' and inserting ``2007''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS.

    Section 7905 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2)(C) by inserting ``and'' after 
                the semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (3) by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (4); and
            (2) in subsection (b)(2)(A) by amending subparagraph (A) to 
        read as follows:
                    ``(A) a qualified transportation fringe as defined 
                in section 132(f)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
                1986;''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Sean Stover, as Chief Financial Officer of NextMedia Operating, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:



(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), being filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                     |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2005 |  | /s/  Sean Stover              
|                     |  | Name: Sean Stover             
|                     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NextMedia Operating, Inc. and will be retained by NextMedia Operating, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### GOLD FUEL SERVICE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued May 24, 1960

Decided June 6, 1960.

*Mr. Sam Weiss*argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant *(Messrs. Pollis, Williams & Pappas,*attorneys).

*Mr. Burtis W. Horner*argued the cause for defendant-respondent *(Messrs. Strylcer, Tams & Horner,*attorneys).

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed solely for the reasons expressed by the trial court with respect to the absence of jurisdiction of the state court to entertain the alleged cause of action. 59 *N. J. Super.*6, 16, 18 *(Ch. Div.*1959).

*For*affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall and Schet-TINO—7.

*For*reversal—None.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maurice Smith, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 375]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered September 9, 2009, convicting him of murder in the second degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of the right to a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to object to the subject remarks *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Williams,*46 NY2d 1070,1071 [1979]; *People v Charles,*57 AD3d 556, 556 [2008]). In any event, the challenged remarks were within the broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing arguments, fair comment on the evidence, or responsive to arguments and issues raised by the defense, or otherwise do not warrant reversal *(see People v Halm,*81 NY2d 819, 821 [1993]; *People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396, 401 [1981]; *People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105, 109-110 [1976]; *People v Hernandez,*92 AD3d 802 [2012]; *People v Smalls,*65 AD3d 708 [2009]).

*1024The defendant received effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 711-712 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 146 [1981]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Chambers and Cohen, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Leonard A. Cullo, Jr., Arthur Winkleblack and
Laura Stein, and each of them, such person's true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for such person
and in such person's name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign
H. J. Heinz Finance Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2003 and to sign any and all amendments to such Annual Report,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done,
as fully to all intents and purposes as such person might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or
any of them, or such persons' or person's substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     This Power of Attorney has been signed below as of the 23rd day of July
2003 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

<Table>
<Caption>
SIGNATURE                                                             TITLE
---------                                                             -----
<S>                                                <C>

/s/ LEONARD A. CULLO, JR.                          Director and President
---------------------------------------------      (Principal Executive Officer)
Leonard A. Cullo, Jr.

/s/ LAURA STEIN                                    Director, Vice President and Secretary
---------------------------------------------
Laura Stein

/s/ ANDREW L. STIDD                                Director
---------------------------------------------
Andrew L. Stidd

/s/ ARTHUR WINKLEBLACK                             Director, Vice President and
---------------------------------------------        Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Arthur Winkleblack                                 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
</Table>
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Hani Zabaneh, President, Secretary, Treasurer and director of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc., certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

(a)            Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)            Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)            Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 14.18 Golder Associates S.A. Av. 11 de Septiembre 2353 Piso 12
Providencia, Santiago, Chile
TE.: (56-2) 233 5868
Fax.: (56-2) 334 5803
wshaw@golder.cl 14 April 2004 Companhia Vale do Rio Doce
Avenida Graça Aranha, 26
20005-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ
Brasil Gentlemen, Golder Associates S.A. (Golder Associates) hereby consents to being named in
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (CVRD) and Vale
Overseas Limited (Vale Overseas) for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
2003 20-F) in reference to Golder Associates review of CVRDs mineral
reserves as of December 31, 2003. Golder Associates also consents to the
incorporation by reference of the 2003 20-F into the Registration Statement on
Form F-4 of Vale Overseas (File No. 333-109610) and CVRD (File No.
333-109610-01) and the Registration Statement on Form F-3 of Vale Overseas
(File No. 333-110867-01) and CVRD (File No. 333-110867), and all amendments
thereto. Yours faithfully, GOLDER ASSOCIATES /s/ Dr. W J Shaw
FAusIMM, CPGeo, FAIG, RPGeo. Principal, Ore Evaluation Services
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #16932 and #16933; KENTUCKY Disaster Number KY-00084]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of KENTUCKY (FEMA-4595-DR), dated 04/23/2021.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.                    

*Incident Period:*                         02/27/2021 through 03/14/2021.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 06/24/2021.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/23/2021.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/24/2022.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of KENTUCKY, dated 04/23/2021, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 07/23/2021.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2021-15269 Filed 7-16-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P