alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****RULE 13A-14(a) [SECTION 302] CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Douglas N. Biddle, Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Plumas Bancorp (the Registrant);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: March 13, 2006   /s/ D. N. Biddle         Douglas N. Biddle, Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40567

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIKE RENA, JR.,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC Nos. B-94-CV-266, B-90-CR-323-13

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Mike Rena, Jr., appeals from the district court's

order denying his motion to vacate his sentence, filed pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues that the district court erred in

enhancing his offense level based on his role as a "supervisor,"

under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, and in denying an offense role reduction

for acceptance of responsibility, under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. 

Because claims challenging technical applications of the

Sentencing Guidelines are not cognizable in a § 2255 proceeding, 
No. 95-40567

-2-

Rena's arguments are meritless. United States v. Vaughn, 955

F.2d 367, 368 (5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements of Syniverse Holdings, Inc.:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-124866) pertaining to the Syniverse Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated Founders and Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plans,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-134057) pertaining to the Syniverse Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long-term Equity Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-143631) of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and related Prospectus;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated February 26, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Syniverse
Holdings, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP Certified
Public Accountants


Tampa, Florida

February 26, 2009
# C_2020077EN.01004701.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Vinos de Arganza v EUIPO — Nordbrand Nordhausen (ENCANTO)

(Case T-239/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark ENCANTO - Earlier national word mark BELCANTO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 77/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Vinos de Arganza, SL (Toral de los Vados, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Nordbrand Nordhausen GmbH (Nordhausen, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 January 2019 (Case R 392/2018-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nordbrand Nordhausen and Vinos de Arganza.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Vinos de Arganza, SL, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Vinos de Arganza, SL, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
IPA TECHNOLOGIES INC., Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC, Appellee

______________________

2021

- 1438, 2021

- 1439

______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s . IPR2019

- 00733, IPR2019

- 00734.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M IEKE K. M ALMBERG
, Skiermont Derby LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by S TEVEN W AYNE H ARTSELL
, J AIME O LIN
, P AUL S KIERMONT
, S ARAH E LIZABETH S PIRES , Dallas, TX.

N AVEEN M ODI
, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by A RVIND J AIRAM
, S TEPHEN B LAKE K INNAIRD
, J OSEPH P ALYS
, D ANIEL Z EILBERGER ; M ICHAEL C. H ENDERSHOT , Jones Day, Palo Alto, CA Case: 21-1438 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 03/11/2022______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK
, S CHALL
, and T ARANTO
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 11, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-1438 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 03/11/2022
# C_2020433EN.01004501.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 –Karpeta-Kovalyova v Commission

(Case T-249/19) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Remuneration - Decision refusing entitlement to the expatriation allowance, the daily subsistence allowance, the installation allowance and to reimbursement of removal expenses and travel costs on taking up duties - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Diplomatic status - Five-year reference period - Concept of ‘habitual residence’)

(2020/C 433/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the Commission decision of 14 June 2018 refusing the applicant entitlement to the expatriation allowance, the daily subsistence allowance, the installation allowance and to reimbursement of travel costs on taking up duties and of removal expenses.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 990 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 24, 2011.
    Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 990) entitled ``An Act 
to provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
for other purposes.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS 
              UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS 
              INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 112-1 (125 Stat. 3), is 
amended by striking ``May 31, 2011'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``September 30, 2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on May 30, 2011.

SEC. 2. COMPETITIVE SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR SBIR AND STTR PROGRAMS.

    Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638) is amended by 
inserting after subsection (r) the following:
    ``(s) Competitive Selection Procedures for SBIR and STTR 
Programs.--All funds awarded, appropriated, or otherwise made available 
in accordance with subsection (f) or (n) must be awarded pursuant to 
competitive and merit-based selection procedures.''.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 990

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
# C_2020019EN.01001901.xml

| 20.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 22 October 2019 — A.B. and B.B. v Personal Exchange International Limited

(Case C-774/19)

(2020/C 19/23)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: A.B., B.B.

Defendant: Personal Exchange International Limited

Question referred

Must Article 15(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 (1) be interpreted as meaning that an online poker playing contract, concluded remotely over the internet by an individual with a foreign operator of online games and subject to that operator’s general terms and conditions, can also be classified as a contract concluded by a consumer for a purpose which can be regarded as being outside his trade or profession, where that individual has, for several years, lived on the income thus obtained or the winnings from playing poker, even though he has no formal registration for that type of activity and in any event does not offer that activity to third parties on the market as a paid service?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 863 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 863

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify that the value 
  of certain funeral and burial arrangements are not to be considered 
  available resources under the supplemental security income program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 2011

   Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify that the value 
  of certain funeral and burial arrangements are not to be considered 
  available resources under the supplemental security income program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUNERAL AND BURIAL ARRANGEMENTS NOT CONSIDERED 
              RESOURCES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1613(e)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1382b(e)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(C) If--
            ``(i) an individual or the individual's spouse enters into 
        an irrevocable contract with a provider of funeral goods and 
        services for a funeral;
            ``(ii) the individual or the individual's spouse funds the 
        contract by paying for the goods and services; and
            ``(iii)(I) the funeral provider subsequently places the 
        funds in a trust or in escrow; or
            ``(II) the individual or the individual's spouse 
        establishes an irrevocable trust, and the funeral provider is 
        the named beneficiary of the trust,
then the trust or escrow shall not be considered a resource available 
to the individual.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to payments for supplemental security income benefits under title 
XVI of the Social Security Act for months beginning on or after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021242EN.01002101.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Acron and Others v Commission

(Case T-45/19) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia - Request for partial interim review - Termination of the partial interim review - No change of circumstances - Error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence)

(2021/C 242/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Acron PAO (Veliky Novgorod, Russia), Dorogobuzh PAO (Dorogobuzh, Russia), Acron Switzerland AG (Baar, Switzerland) (represented by: T. De Meese, J. Stuyck and M. Van Nieuwenborgh, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Gustafsson and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Fertilizers Europe (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. O’Connor, Solicitor)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1703 of 12 November 2018 terminating the partial interim review concerning imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia (OJ 2018 L 285, p. 97).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Acron PAO, Dorogobuzh PAO and Acron Switzerland AG to bear, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission and by Fertilizers Europe. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Acron PAO, Dorogobuzh PAO and Acron Switzerland AG to bear, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission and by Fertilizers Europe.

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.

---
# C_2022011EN.01002202.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-495/19) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - European citizen’s initiative - Cohesion policy - National minority regions - Registration decision - Action for annulment - Actionable measure - Admissibility - Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 11/29)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented by: E. Gane, R. Haţieganu, L. Liţu and L.-E. Baţagoi, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Stancu, I. Martínez del Peral and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, M. Tátrai and K. Szíjjártó, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/721 of 30 April 2019 on the proposed citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (OJ 2019 L 122, p. 55).

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Romania to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Romania to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Hungary to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Hungary to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.

---
# C_2021357EN.01002102.xml

| 6.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management v EUIPO — Yiwu Dearbody Cosmetics (BODYSECRETS)

(Case T-810/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark BODYSECRETS - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - Customary nature - Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d), and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d), and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2021/C 357/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc. (Reynoldsburg, Ohio, United States) (represented by: J. Dickerson, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Yiwu Dearbody Cosmetics Co. Ltd (Yiwu City, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2019 (Case R 2422/2018-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management and Yiwu Dearbody Cosmetics.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.

---
#### Larry E. Chace *v.*George D. Bronson, Warden

*John R. Williams,*in support of the petition.

*Susan C. Marks,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 25, 1989

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 674, is denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification is
included  solely for the purpose of complying with the provisions of Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act and is not to be  used  for any  other  purpose.  In
connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Rub A Dub
Soap,  Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2006,  I, Kevin B.  Halter,  Jr.,  hereby
certifies  in my  capacity  as an  officer  of Rub A Dub Soap,  Inc.  that to my
knowledge:

         1. The Annual Report on Form  10-KSB/A of Rub A Dub Soap,  Inc. for the
year ended May 31, 2006,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of
Rub A Dub Soap, Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2005,  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Rub A
Dub Soap, Inc.

Date:    November 13, 2006                      /s/ Kevin B. Halter, Jr.
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Kevin B. Halter, Jr., President,
                                               Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                               Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Weston Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
"Report"), I, Yin Sen Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 12, 2005


By:/s/ Yin Sen Wong
----------------------
 Yin Sen Wong, CEO
(principal executive officer)