alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 789 

To express the sense of the Senate that Medicare should not be dismantled 

and turned into a voucher program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 12, 2011 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. NELSON of Florida) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To express the sense of the Senate that Medicare should 

not be dismantled and turned into a voucher program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT MEDICARE 

4 SHOULD NOT BE DISMANTLED AND TURNED 

5 INTO A VOUCHER PROGRAM. 

6 (a) FINDINGS.—The Senate makes the following 

7 findings: 

8 (1) The Medicare program has been providing 

9 affordable health care for elderly and disabled Amer10 icans for decades. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 789 IS

1 (2) Forty-seven million Americans currently 

2 rely on the Medicare program for their health care. 

3 (3) The Congressional Budget Office has stated 

4 that under the House Budget Committee fiscal year 

5 2012 budget resolution ‘‘most elderly people would 

6 pay more for their health care than they would pay 

7 under the current Medicare system’’. 

8 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the 

9 Senate that— 

10 (1) Medicare should not be dismantled and 

11 turned into a voucher or premium-support program; 

12 (2) deficit reduction should not be achieved by 

13 simply passing on the costs of health care to Medi14 care beneficiaries; 

15 (3) guaranteed Medicare benefits should be pre16 served; 

17 (4) medical decisions should be made by seniors 

18 and their doctors, not insurance companies; and 

19 (5) deficit reduction should be achieved by low20 ering health care costs through delivery system re21 forms. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32.1**

 

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuantto**

**Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

                I,Hal M. Krisbergh, the Chief Executive Officer of WorldGate Communications,Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that the Form 10-Q of WorldGate Communications, Inc., for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2005, which this certification accompanies, fullycomplies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the March31, 2005 Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of WorldGate Communications, Inc.

 

                Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to WorldGate and will be retained by WorldGate and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: August 29, 2005 |   | /s/ HAL M.  KRISBERGH                       |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Hal M. KrisberghPrincipal Executive Officer |

 

----
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2389 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2006 

Received 

AUGUST 4 (legislative day, AUGUST 3), 2006 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, with respect to 

the jurisdiction of Federal courts over certain cases and 

controversies involving the Pledge of Allegiance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

HR 2389 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pledge Protection Act 

3 of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 99 of title 28, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘§ 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction 

9 ‘‘(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), no court 

10 created by Act of Congress shall have any jurisdiction, and 

11 the Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction, to 

12 hear or decide any question pertaining to the interpreta13 tion of, or the validity under the Constitution of, the 

14 Pledge of Allegiance, as defined in section 4 of title 4, 

15 or its recitation. 

16 ‘‘(b) The limitation in subsection (a) does not apply 

17 to— 

18 ‘‘(1) any court established by Congress under 

19 its power to make needful rules and regulations re20 specting the territory of the United States; or 

21 ‘‘(2) the Superior Court of the District of Co22 lumbia or the District of Columbia Court of Ap23 peals;’’. 

24 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

25 at the beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

HR 2389 RFS 

1 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

2 item: 

‘‘1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.’’. 

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

4 This Act and the amendments made by this Act take 

5 effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply 

6 to any case that— 

7 (1) is pending on such date of enactment; or 

8 (2) is commenced on or after such date of en9 actment. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 924 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide commuter flexible 

spending arrangements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2011 

Mr. BEGICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

commuter flexible spending arrangements, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Account to 

5 Save on Transportation Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGE7 MENTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 125 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to cafeteria plans) is amended 

10 by redesignating subsections (k) and (l) as subsections (l) 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 924 IS

1 and (m), respectively, and by inserting after subsection (j) 

2 the following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(k) TRANSPORTATION FLEXIBLE SPENDING AR4 RANGEMENT.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection 

6 (f), qualified transportation fringe shall be treated 

7 during the 2-taxable year period beginning after the 

8 date of the enactment of this subsection as a quali9 fied benefit for purposes of this section to the extent 

10 provided under a flexible spending arrangement (as 

11 defined in section 106(c)). 

12 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED TRANSPORTATION FRINGE.— 

13 For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘qualified 

14 transportation fringe’ has the meaning given such 

15 term by section 132(f), except that paragraph (1)(A) 

16 thereof shall be applied for any month immediately 

17 preceded by a 4-month period during which the na18 tional average regular gasoline retail price (cal19 culated by the Energy Information Administration) 

20 exceeds such price for calendar year 2010, by sub21 stituting ‘or personal vehicle fuel cost if such trans22 portation or fuel cost’ for ‘if such transportation’.’’. 

23 (b) MODIFICATION OF REGULATIONS.—The Sec24 retary of the Treasury shall make such modifications to 

25 Treasury Regulations under section 125 of the Internal 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 924 IS

1 Revenue Code of 1986 as may be necessary to allow quali2 fied transportation fringe (as defined in section 125(k)(2) 

3 of such Code) to be offered through a flexible spending 

4 arrangement in a cafeteria plan. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  OF PACIFIC ENERGY GP, INC.  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 that is being filed concurrently with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of Pacific Energy GP, Inc., the general partner of
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") hereby certifies that:

| |  | /s/GERALD A. TYWONIUKGerald A. Tywoniuk
March 12, 2004
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and will be retained by Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Yosemite Mortgage Fund II, LLC (the
"Issuer") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, I, Steven M.
Pontes, General Manager of MFP Management LLC, the Manager of the Issuer, and
the equivalent of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
Issuer, certify that the Report on Form 10-KSB containing the financial
statements of the Issuer fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer.



Date:  March 26, 2004



 /S/ STEVEN M. PONTES
-------------------------------------
Steven M. Pontes, General Manager,
MFP Management LLC, Manager



                                    Page 31
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 3, 

2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-01167-CV

CATHY X. CLARK, ROSS A. CLARK AND HUA XU, Appellants

V.

CHARLES HAMMOND, III, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-43081

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order signed January 4, 2013. On March 11, 2014, 

appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The 

motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby and Donovan.
# C_2019413EN.01002201.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/22

---

Appeal brought on 30 July 2019 by Holzer y Cia, SA de CV against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 23 May 2019 in Joined Cases T-3/18 and T-4/18: Holzer y Cia v EUIPO - Annco

(Case C-582/19 P)

(2019/C 413/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Holzer y Cia, SA de CV (represented by: N.A. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Annco, Inc.

By order of 22 October 2019 the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal is not allowed to proceed and that Holzer y Cia, SA de CV, shall bear its own costs.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 25, 2018

Order 

Clerk

July 25, 2018

152798(44)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 152798

v COA: 322151

Oakland CC: 2012-242851-FH

ANTHONY GESTAIL TUCKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his brief on appeal is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if 

submitted on or before September 25, 2018.
Exhibit 32.3

THANKSGIVING COFFEE COMPANY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sam KraynekChief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2006
Exhibit 31.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin B. Halter Jr., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Rub A Dub Soap, Inc.

2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report.

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us
          by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in
          which this annual report is being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's  disclosure  controls and
          procedures  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

5.   I have disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of directors  (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  that  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls.

Date:  July 3, 2007               /s/ Kevin B. Halter, Jr.
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Kevin B. Halter, Jr.
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB OF AUDIOHIGHWAY.COM
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             164
<SECURITIES>                                       577
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,908
<PP&E>                                           1,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,745
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,717
<OTHER-SE>                                    (32,802)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,789
<SALES>                                          1,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,980
<CGS>                                            1,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (68)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.92)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darrell Kinard, Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 493]

*471Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara F. Newman, J.), rendered June 29, 2010, as amended July 21, 2010, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. “When a defendant moves to withdraw a guilty plea, the nature and extent of the fact-finding inquiry rest[s] largely in the discretion of the Judge to whom the motion is made and a hearing will be granted only in rare instances” *(People v Brown,*14 NY3d 113, 116 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Defendant received a full opportunity to present his arguments, which were properly rejected by the court *(see People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520 [1978]). Defendant was represented by new counsel, who made a written plea withdrawal motion. Neither defendant nor his counsel sought to amplify the written submissions, and no hearing was requested.

The record establishes the voluntariness of the plea. Defendant did not substantiate his claims that his plea was involuntary or that the attorney who represented him at the time of the plea rendered ineffective assistance. To the extent the record permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance in connection with his plea *(see People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; *see also Hill v Lockhart,*474 US 52, 59 [1985]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.
S. 925 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To designate Mt. Andrea Lawrence. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mt. Andrea Lawrence Designation 

Act of 2011’’. 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds that Andrea Mead Lawrence— 

(1) was born in Rutland County, Vermont, on April 19, 

1932, where she developed a life-long love of winter sports 

and appreciation for the environment; 

(2) competed in the 1948 Winter Olympics in St. Moritz, 

Switzerland, and the 1956 Winter Olympics in Cortina 

d’Ampezzo, Italy, and was the torch lighter at the 1960 Winter 

Olympics in Squaw Valley, California; 

(3) won 2 Gold Medals in the Olympic special and giant 

slalom races at the 1952 Winter Olympics in Oslo, Norway, 

and remains the only United States double-gold medalist in 

alpine skiing; 

(4) was inducted into the U.S. National Ski Hall of Fame 

in 1958 at the age of 25; 

(5) moved in 1968 to Mammoth Lakes in the spectacularly 

beautiful Eastern Sierra of California, a place that she fought 

to protect for the rest of her life; 

(6) founded the Friends of Mammoth to maintain the 

beauty and serenity of Mammoth Lakes and the Eastern Sierra; 

(7) served for 16 years on the Mono County Board of 

Supervisors, where she worked tirelessly to protect and restore 

Mono Lake, Bodie State Historic Park, and other important 

natural and cultural landscapes of the Eastern Sierra; 

(8) worked, as a member of the Great Basin Air Pollution 

Control District, to reduce air pollution that had been caused 

by the dewatering of Owens Lake; 

(9) founded the Andrea Lawrence Institute for Mountains 

and Rivers in 2003 to work for environmental protection and 

economic vitality in the region she loved so much; 

(10) testified in 2008 before the Mono County Board of 

Supervisors in favor of the Eastern Sierra and Northern San 

Gabriel Wild Heritage Act, a bill that was enacted the day 

before she died; 
S. 925—2 

(11) passed away on March 31, 2009, at 76 years of age, 

leaving 5 children, Cortlandt, Matthew, Deirdre, Leslie, and 

Quentin, and 4 grandchildren; and 

(12) leaves a rich legacy that will continue to benefit 

present and future generations. 

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF MT. ANDREA LAWRENCE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Peak 12,240 (which is located 0.6 miles northeast of Donahue Peak on the northern border of the Ansel Adams 

Wilderness and Yosemite National Park (UTM coordinates Zone 

11, 304428 E, 4183631 N)) shall be known and designated as 

‘‘Mt. Andrea Lawrence’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, record, or other paper of the United States to the peak 

described in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference 

to ‘‘Mt. Andrea Lawrence’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.