alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER R EGARDING B ANKRUPTY S TAY

Appellate case name: Guadalupe Zermeno and Ildefonso Zermeno v. Carolyn Stone
Appellate case number: 01

- 2 2

- 00 723

- CV

Trial court case number: 2022

- 33380

- 7

Trial court: 2 3 4 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant s , Guadalupe Zermeno and Ildefonso Zermeno , filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s October 3 , 2022 “Order Granting [Appellee Carolyn] Stone’s Motion to Dismiss [Appellants’ ] Original Petition for Bill of Review

. ” On December 19, 2022,

a ppellant , Ildefonso Zermeno, filed a “ Notice of Suggestion of Bankruptcy ,” notifying the Court that on September 5, 2022, a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Petition had been filed on his behalf in the United State Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division

. Appellant’s suggestion of bankruptcy states that the bankruptcy bears the case number 2209

- 32621.
Pursuant to appellant’s Notice of Suggestion of Bankruptcy, this appeal i s stayed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (automatic stay in bankruptcy). Until the parties notify the Court that the bankruptcy proceedings have concluded and move to reinstate the appeal, the Court will take no further action other than to receive and hold any documents submitted to the Clerk of this Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2 (providing bankruptcy “suspends the appeal and all periods in these rules from the date when the bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court reinstates or severs the appeal in accordance with federal law”); see also Budzyn v. Citibank (S.D.), N.A. , No. 01

- 08

- 00211

- CV, 2010 WL 2044628, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] May 19, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (staying “entire appeal” pending bankruptcy proceedings).
Accordingly, this appeal is stayed and will be removed from the Court’s active docket until a party successfully moves to reinstate the appeal or sever the appeal with respect to the bankrupt party. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.3.It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __

/s/ April Farris

_________  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___ January 5, 2023

_____
Exhibit 31.2

I, Daniel L. Hefner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Commerce Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers
and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                     |  |                                               |  |              
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|/s/ Daniel L. Hefner |  | Chief Executive Officer, President & Director |  | June 14, 2009
LOCK-UP
AGREEMENT

     

    November
26, 2009

     

    EXCEED
COMPANY LTD.

    Xidelong
Industrial Zone

    Jinjiang,
Fuijan Province, PRC

     

    Ladies
and Gentlemen:

     

    The
undersigned hereby agrees that, without the prior written consent of Exceed
Company Ltd. (the “Company”), the undersigned will not, during the three-year
period from October 21, 2009, through and including October 20, 2012, sell or
otherwise transfer or dispose of any ordinary shares of the Company (“Ordinary
Shares”) or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
Ordinary Shares, or enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in
whole or in part, the economic consequences of ownership of Ordinary Shares. The
foregoing sentence shall not apply to (a) Ordinary Shares acquired in open
market transactions after the effectiveness of the Registration Statement on
Form F-1 (File No. 333-163280) first filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 23, 2009, (b) transfers or distributions of Ordinary
Shares to affiliates, limited partners, members or shareholders of the
undersigned, provided
that in the case of clause (b), each transferee shall sign and deliver a
lock-up agreement substantially in the form of this lock-up agreement or (c) a
liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction which results
in all of the Company’s shareholders having the right to exchange their Ordinary
Shares for cash, securities or other property.

     

    The
undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the undersigned has full power
and authority to enter into this lock-up agreement.

     

    This
lock-up agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of New York, without regard to the conflict of laws principles
thereof.

     

    
      
        
          	 	
                  Very
      truly yours,

                
	 	 
      
	 	
                  /s/Lin Shuipan

                
	 	
                  LIN
      SHUIPAN
# C_2019363EN.01000601.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/6 |
| ---------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia (Spain) lodged on 8 July 2019 — CB v Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Regional de Galicia (Case C-521/19) (2019/C 363/11) Language of the case: Spanish Referring court Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: CB Defendant: Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Regional de Galicia Questions referred Must Articles 73 and 78 of the VAT Directive, ( 1 ) in the light of the principles of neutrality, prohibition of tax evasion and abuse of rights, and prohibition of the illegal distortion of competition, be interpreted as precluding national legislation and the case-law interpreting it, pursuant to which, where the tax authorities discover concealed transactions subject to value added tax for which no invoice was issued, the price agreed by the parties for those transactions must be regarded as already including value added tax? Is it therefore possible, in cases of fraud in which the transaction was concealed from the tax authorities, to consider, as may be deduced from the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 28 July 2016 (Case C-332/15, Astone ( 2 )), of 5 October 2016 (Case C-576/15, Marinova ( 3 )) and of 7 March 2018 (C-159/17, Dobre ( 4 )), that the amounts paid and received do not include value added tax in order to conduct the proper assessment and impose the appropriate penalty? ( 1 )  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1). ( 2 )  Judgment of 28 July 2016, Astone (C-332/15, EU:C:2016:614). ( 3 )  Judgment of 5 October 2016, Marinova (C-576/15, EU:C:2016:740). ( 4 )  Judgment of 7 March 2018, Dobre (C-159/17, EU:C:2018:161).

---
| 1. | The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended April 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|          | /s/ Denis A. Krusos       |   |
|---------------|---------------------------|--------|
|          | Denis A. Krusos           |   |
|          | Chairman of the Board and |   |
| June 14, 2011 | Chief Executive Officer   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,270
<SECURITIES>                                    25,670
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                       689
<INVENTORY>                                        389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,650
<PP&E>                                          15,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169  
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,898
<SALES>                                         18,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,344
<CGS>                                            1,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,072
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,899
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,173
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,173
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December  31, 2004 as filed with the SEC on
the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, R. E.  Coffman,  Jr.,  President  and Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ R. E.  Coffman, Jr.

R. E. Coffman, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 13, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                       81
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory J. Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                              ___/s/ Gregory J. Dawson____
                              Chief Financial Officer

                              August 18, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Kentucky
Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



10
# C_2019255EN.01002101.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 16 April 2019 — EUflight.de GmbH v Eurowings GmbH

(Case C-345/19)

(2019/C 255/30)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: EUflight.de GmbH

Defendant: Eurowings GmbH

Questions referred

| 1. | Are the provisions of Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that passengers who are transported to their final destination via the booked flight over an hour before the planned time of departure obtain compensation, by application by analogy of Article 7 of that regulation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are the provisions of Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that passengers who are transported to their final destination via the booked flight over an hour before the planned time of departure obtain compensation, by application by analogy of Article 7 of that regulation?

| 2. | Can that compensation be reduced according to flight distance pursuant to Article 7(2) if the time of arrival precedes the periods of delayed arrival specified therein, or even the scheduled time of arrival? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can that compensation be reduced according to flight distance pursuant to Article 7(2) if the time of arrival precedes the periods of delayed arrival specified therein, or even the scheduled time of arrival?

| 3. | Is the possibility of a reduction excluded if the time of departure precedes the scheduled time of departure by the same amount of time provided for by the delay limits in Article 7(2) (that is, more than two, three or four hours)? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is the possibility of a reduction excluded if the time of departure precedes the scheduled time of departure by the same amount of time provided for by the delay limits in Article 7(2) (that is, more than two, three or four hours)?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.)

---
Exhibit 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

SERIES 2002-1G WST TRUST

I, Peter Walden, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the
year covered by this annual report of Series 2002-1G WST Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not
contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual
compliance statement included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicers compliance with the
minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: EDS (Business Process Administration) Pty Limited and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Signature:

/s/ Peter Walden

---

27 September 2006

Title: Principal Financial Officer

Westpac Securitisation Management Pty Limited
# C_2019206EN.01002801.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/28

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 25 March 2019 — JE v KF

(Case C-249/19)

(2019/C 206/32)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul București

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: JE

Rrespondent: KF

Question referred

On a proper construction of Article 10 of Regulation No 1259/2010, (1) under which ‘[w]here the law applicable pursuant to Article 5 or Article 8 makes no provision for divorce or does not grant one of the spouses equal access to divorce or legal separation on grounds of their sex, the law of the forum shall apply’, is the expression ‘the law applicable pursuant to Article 5 or Article 8 makes no provision for divorce’ to be interpreted in a strict, literal manner, that it is to say only in respect of a situation where the foreign law applicable makes no provision for any form of divorce, or (b) more broadly, as also including a situation where the foreign law applicable permits divorce, but does so in extremely limited circumstances, involving an obligatory legal separation procedure prior to divorce, in respect of which the law of the forum contains no equivalent procedural provisions?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 of 20 December 2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation (OJ 2010 L 343, p. 10).

---
# C_2020339EN.01001901.xml

| 12.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries v EUIPO (Moins de migraine pour vivre mieux)

(Case T-696/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Moins de migraine pour vivre mieux - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 339/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (Petah Tikva, Israel) (represented by: J. Bogatz and Y. Stone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 August 2019 (Case R 778/2019-5), relating to an application for registration of the word sign Moins de migraine pour vivre mieux as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.

---