alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020414EN.01003502.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Arbuzov v Council

(Case T-289/19) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

(2020/C 414/56)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Sergej Arbuzov (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Pekař and P. Mahnič, Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/354 of 4 March 2019 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2019 L 64, p. 7) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/352 of 4 March 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2019 L 64, p. 1), in so far as those acts maintain the applicant’s name on the list of the persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/354 of 4 March 2019 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/352 of 4 March 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as Sergej Arbuzov’s name has been maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/354 of 4 March 2019 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/352 of 4 March 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as Sergej Arbuzov’s name has been maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.

---
# United State s Court of Appeals For the F irst Circuit

No. 10-1648

JUANITA SÁNCHEZ, on behalf of minor child D.R.-S.; 7,124 ADDITIONAL PLAINTIFFS FOUND IN ATTACHMENT A,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Appellee.
ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on February 14, 2012, is amended as follows: On p. 51, line 17: "AFTWF" should read "AFWTF"
# C_2019372EN.01001501.xml

| 4.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n.o 3 de Valencia (Spain) lodged on 23 July 2019 — GT v Air Nostrum Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo, S.A.

(Case C-560/19)

(2019/C 372/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil n.o 3 de Valencia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: GT

Defendant: Air Nostrum Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo, S.A.

Questions referred

| 1. | Can a company which provides air passenger transport and which sells the ticket but which does not actually operate the flight be considered to come within the concept of ‘operating air carrier’? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can a company which provides air passenger transport and which sells the ticket but which does not actually operate the flight be considered to come within the concept of ‘operating air carrier’?

| 2. | If the answer to the previous question is in the negative, does the right to compensation for passengers under Article 7 of Regulation [(EC) No] 261/2004 (1) exist where the flight is composed of more than one leg and, as a result of a short delay (less than three hours) on one leg, there is a long delay (more than three hours) on arrival at the final destination because of a missed connection? If the answer is in the affirmative, where the different legs are operated by different carriers, is the obligation to pay compensation under Article 7 of Regulation [(EC) No] 261/2004 incumbent on the operating carrier on whose leg there was a short delay (less than three hours) which, however, caused the missed connection and, therefore, a long delay (more than three hours) on arrival at the final destination? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the previous question is in the negative, does the right to compensation for passengers under Article 7 of Regulation [(EC) No] 261/2004 (1) exist where the flight is composed of more than one leg and, as a result of a short delay (less than three hours) on one leg, there is a long delay (more than three hours) on arrival at the final destination because of a missed connection? If the answer is in the affirmative, where the different legs are operated by different carriers, is the obligation to pay compensation under Article 7 of Regulation [(EC) No] 261/2004 incumbent on the operating carrier on whose leg there was a short delay (less than three hours) which, however, caused the missed connection and, therefore, a long delay (more than three hours) on arrival at the final destination?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 714 

To reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2011 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr. 

UDALL of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Land Trans5 action Facilitation Act Reauthorization of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL LAND TRANSACTION FACILITATION ACT. 

7 The Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act is 

8 amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 714 IS

1 (1) in section 203(2) (43 U.S.C. 2302(2)), by 

2 striking ‘‘on the date of enactment of this Act was’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘is’’; 

4 (2) in section 205 (43 U.S.C. 2304)— 

5 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘this 

6 Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the Federal Land Trans7 action Facilitation Act Reauthorization of 

8 2009’’; and 

9 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘11’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘21’’; 

11 (3) in section 206 (43 U.S.C. 2305), by striking 

12 subsection (f); and 

13 (4) in section 207(b) (43 U.S.C. 2306(b))— 

14 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

15 (i) by striking ‘‘96–568’’ and insert16 ing ‘‘96–586’’; and 

17 (ii) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and inserting a 

18 semicolon; 

19 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

20 (i) by inserting ‘‘Public Law 105– 

21 263;’’ before ‘‘112 Stat.’’; and 

22 (ii) by striking the period at the end 

23 and inserting a semicolon; and 

24 (C) by adding at the end the following: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 714 IS

1 ‘‘(3) the White Pine County Conservation, 

2 Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 (Public 

3 Law 109–432; 120 Stat. 3028); 

4 ‘‘(4) the Lincoln County Conservation, Recre5 ation, and Development Act of 2004 (Public Law 

6 108–424; 118 Stat. 2403); 

7 ‘‘(5) subtitle F of title I of the Omnibus Public 

8 Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 1132 

9 note; Public Law 111–11); 

10 ‘‘(6) subtitle O of title I of the Omnibus Public 

11 Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 460www 

12 note, 1132 note; Public Law 111–11); 

13 ‘‘(7) section 2601 of the Omnibus Public Land 

14 Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 

15 Stat. 1108); or 

16 ‘‘(8) section 2606 of the Omnibus Public Land 

17 Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 

18 Stat. 1121).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          44,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,189
<PP&E>                                          10,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,276
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,225
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,946
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (480)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,219)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,219)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT21.1**

 

**Subsidiariesof META Group, Inc.**

 

The SentryGroup, Inc.incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

MG (Bermuda)Ltd. incorporated in Bermuda

1422722 Ontario, Inc. incorporated in Canada

META Group Singapore PTE Limited incorporated in Singapore

META GroupAustralia Holdings PTY Limited incorporated in Australia

AbundantStrategy SDN.BHD incorporated in Malaysia

META GroupFrance, S.A. incorporated in France

META Group AGincorporated in Germany

META GroupItalia S.R.L. incorporated in Italy

META Group UKHoldings Limited incorporated in the United Kingdom

META GroupNorway A/S incorporated in Norway

META GroupSweden AB incorporated in Sweden

META GroupFinland OY incorporated in Finland

META GroupDenmark A/S incorporated in Denmark

META GroupBelgium SA incorporated in Belgium

META GroupNederland BV incorporated in the Netherlands

META GroupNorthern Europe ApS incorporated in Denmark

ATEMNetherlands ApS incorporated in Denmark

META GroupKorea Co. Limited incorporated in South Korea

META Group ITCorp. incorporated in the Philippines

META GroupDeutschland GmbH incorporated in Germany

META GroupAustria GmbH incorporated in Austria

META GroupSchweiz AG incorporated in Switzerland

META GroupCESE GmbH incorporated in Germany

META GroupIberia S.L. incorporated in Spain

META GroupMiddle East FZ – L.L.C. incorporated in United Arab Emirates

META GroupSaudi L.L.C. – incorporated in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

META GroupRomania – incorporated in Romania

 

1

----
[No. 20316-2-II.

Division Two.

September 5, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Gordon Francis Harryman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 95-1-01740-1, James D. Ladley, J., entered January 19, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Morgan, J.
Exhibit 32.3

THANKSGIVING COFFEE COMPANY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sam KraynekChief Financial Officer March 31, 2008
ex10a.htm


    


    


    Exhibit
10(a)

    


    


    


    Consent of Ernst
& Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    


    


    We consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm” and to the
use of our reports dated (a) March 18, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
and (b) March 13, 2009, with respect to the financial statements of
Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, in Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to
the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-138190) pertaining to
Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, which is incorporated by reference
into Post-Effective Amendment No. 14.

    


                                         /s/ Ernst & Young
LLP

     

    Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania

    December 17,
2009
Exhibit 10.2

Confidential

LOGO

Interoffice Memorandum



|      |  |                                                          
|----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|To:   |  | Personnel File                                           
|      | 
|From: |  | Paul M. Finigan, SVP and General Counsel                 
|      | 
|Date: |  | January 24, 2007                                         
|      | 
|Re:   |  | Amendment to Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2006



---

I, Paul M. Finigan, (the Executive) signed an Employment Agreement (the Agreement) with my employer, CuraGen Corporation (the Company), on or about September 1, 2006, providing that the
Executives initial base salary shall be subject to increases by the Board of Directors, which shall review the salary periodically. Therefore, pursuant to the minutes of the January 24, 2007, Meeting of the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors, the Executives 2007 base salary will be adjusted to $291,200 per year, payable in bi-weekly installments.

Unless explicitly
changed in the Addendum dated January 24, 2007, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



|                           |  | 
|-------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Paul M. Finigan, Esq.  |  | 
|Paul M. Finigan, Esq.      |  | 
|                           | 
|/s/ Frank M. Armstrong, MD |  | 
|Frank M. Armstrong, MD     |  |
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Jason Liddell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports onForm 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect ofperiods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill LynchDepositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1;     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as awhole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of thelast day of the period covered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing informationrequired to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included inthese reports;     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by thedepositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreementand based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under thatagreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trusteehave each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to thecompliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similarstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the poolingor servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank ofNew York and its officers and agents.                                                    /s/ Jason Liddell   Jason Liddell  Date: March 26, 2007 Vice President
# C_2019288EN.01001601.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) lodged on 23 April 2019 — Condominio di Milano v Eurothermo SpA

(Case C-329/19)

(2019/C 288/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Milano

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Condominio di Milano

Defendant: Eurothermo SpA

Question referred

Does the concept of consumer, as adopted by Directive 93/13/EEC, (1) preclude classification as a consumer of an entity (such as the entity comprising owners of apartments in a building (condominio) in Italian law), which does not come within the concept of ‘natural person’ or ‘legal person’, in cases where that entity concludes a contract for purposes which are outside its trade, business or profession and where it is in a position of weakness vis-à-vis the seller or supplier, as regards both its bargaining power and its level of knowledge?

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

---
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                    COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                       MARCH 31,
                                                             ---------------------------
                                                                 1998            1997
                                                             -----------     -----------
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic                    5,280,253       3,071,778
                                                             ===========     ===========
Net income (loss) from continuing operations                 $   328,013     $  (350,749)
Loss from discontinued operations                            $      --       $  (161,723)
                                                             -----------     -----------
Net income (loss)                                            $   328,013     $  (512,472)
                                                             ===========     ===========

Basic income (loss) per share from continuing operations     $      0.06     $     (0.12)
Basic loss per share from discontinued operations            $      --       $     (0.05)
                                                             -----------     -----------
Basic income (loss) per share                                $      0.06     $     (0.17)
                                                             ===========     ===========
</TABLE>
#### In re STREET BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVE. & ELDERT AVE., IN FIFTH WARD, BOROUGH OF QUEENS, IN CITY OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.^

October 18, 1907.)

In the matter of the street between Bayview avenue & Bldert avenue, iñ thé Fifth Ward, borough of Queens, in city of New York.

PER CURIAM.

The order does not open a default, but in effect reviews and reverses the order confirming the report of the commissioners of estimate and assessment. Aside from the question of power, we do not think the papers presented justified the action of the court at Special Term. The order is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with costs.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Certification:
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NewBridge Bancorp;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: May 13, 2011
    /s/pressley a. ridgillPressley A. RidgillPresident and Chief Executive Officer