37738 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 134 / Friday, July 16, 2021 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

47731 (August 6, 2020). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results,’’ 

dated March 2, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Affirmative Preliminary Determination: First 

Administrative Review of Glycine from India,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

4See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Countervailing Duty Order on Glycine from 

India; 2018–2019, New Subsidy Allegations,’’ dated 

June 17, 2021. 

6See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of Subsidy Rate 

for Non-Selected Companies,’’ dated June 30, 2021. 

25, 2021. Rebuttal comments in 

response to material submitted during 

the foregoing period may be submitted 

during the subsequent 15-day period to 

September 9, 2021. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ 

Board’s website, which is accessible via 

www.trade.gov/ftz. 

For further information, contact 

Qahira El-Amin at Qahira.El-Amin@

trade.gov. 

Dated: July 12, 2021. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15128 Filed 7–15–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–23–2021] 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 7— 

Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, Authorization 

of Production Activity, IPR 

Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Pharmaceutical 

Products), Canovanas, Puerto Rico 

On March 15, 2021, IPR 

Pharmaceuticals, Inc., submitted a 

notification of proposed production 

activity to the FTZ Board for its facility 

within FTZ 7, in Canovanas, Puerto 

Rico. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (86 FR 15642, March 

24, 2021). On July 13, 2021, the 

applicant was notified of the FTZ 

Board’s decision that no further review 

of the activity is warranted at this time. 

The production activity described in the 

notification was authorized, subject to 

the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s 

regulations, including Section 400.14. 

Dated: July 13, 2021. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–15126 Filed 7–15–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–884] 

Glycine From India: Preliminary 

Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

glycine from India for the period of 

review (POR) September 4, 2018, 

through December 31, 2019. The 

preliminary net subsidy rates are listed 

below in the section titled ‘‘Preliminary 

Results of Administrative Review.’’ 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable July 16, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Davina Friedmann, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0698. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 6, 2020, Commerce 

published a notice of initiation of 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on glycine 

from India.1 On March 2, 2021, 

Commerce extended the deadline for 

issuing the preliminary results of 

review.2 The revised deadline for these 

preliminary results of review is now 

June 30, 2021. 

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included at Appendix 

I to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is glycine from India. For a complete 

description of the scope of the order, see 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 

preliminarily determine that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution 

that gives rise to a benefit to the 

recipient, and the subsidy is specific.4

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

On June 11, 2021, we initiated an 

investigation of newly alleged subsidy 

programs.5 Because we did not receive 

information from the Government of 

India, Avid Organics Private Limited 

(Avid), or Kumar Industries (India) 

(Kumar) related to the new subsidy 

programs in time to evaluate them for 

purposes of these preliminary results of 

review, we intend to issue postpreliminary review results that 

incorporate these programs.6

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

For companies not selected for 

individual review, because the 2019 

subsidy rates calculated for Avid and 

Kumar were above de minimis and not 

based on facts available, we have 

preliminarily calculated a subsidy rate 

based on a weighted-average of the 

subsidy rates calculated for Avid and 

Kumar using publicly ranged sales data 

submitted by respondents.7 For 2018, 

we preliminarily assigned to the 

companies not individually examined a 

subsidy rate of 3.58 percent, which is 

the 2018 subsidy rate calculated for 

Avid for these preliminary results of 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 134 / Friday, July 16, 2021 / Notices 37739 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Results of the 

First Administrative Review of Glycine from India: 

Calculation of Derivative Rate for Non-Selected 

Companies,’’ dated June 30, 2021. 

9 In this review, we preliminarily determine that 

Avid is cross owned with Avid Intermediates. See 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum for further 

discussion. 

10 In this review, we preliminarily determine that 

Kumar is cross owned with Rudraa International 

and Advance Chemical Corporation. See 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum and Kumar 

Preliminary Calculation Memorandum for further 

discussion. 

11 Kumar reported that it received no subsidies 

during the 2018 calendar year, from programs under 

review or any other subsidies. 

12See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

13See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1); 

see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) 

(Temporary Rule). 

16See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 351.309(d)(2). 

17See Temporary Rule. 

18See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

19See 19 CFR 351.310. 

review.8 This methodology for 

establishing the subsidy rate for the 

non-selected companies is consistent 

with our practice and with section 

705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. For additional 

information, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Preliminary Results of Administrative 

Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4), we determine the 

following preliminary net subsidy rates 

for the 2018–2019 administrative 

review: 

Company 

2018 

Subsidy rate 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

2019 

Subsidy rate 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

Avid 

Organics 

Private 

Limited 9 3.92 4.38 

Kumar Industries 

(India) 10 11 0.00 3.72 

Mulji Mehta 

Enterprises ..... 3.92 4.01 

Mulji Mehta 

Pharma .. 3.92 4.01 

Paras Intermediates 

Private 

Limited ... 3.92 4.01 

Studio Disrupt ........ 3.92 4.01 

Assessment Rates 

Consistent with section 751(a)(2)(C) of 

the Act, upon issuance of the final 

results, Commerce shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties 

on all appropriate entries covered by 

this review. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown for 2019 for each of the 

companies listed above with regard to 

the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. For all non-reviewed firms, we 

will instruct CBP to continue to collect 

cash deposits at the most recent 

company-specific or all-others rate 

applicable to the company, as 

appropriate. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We will disclose to parties of this 

proceeding the calculations performed 

in reaching the preliminary results 

within five days of the date of 

publication of these preliminary 

results.12

As a result of the Department’s 

intention to release a post-preliminary 

analysis memorandum, interested 

parties may submit case briefs on both 

the preliminary results and on the postpreliminary analysis memorandum no 

later than seven days after the 

disclosure of the calculations performed 

in connection with the post-preliminary 

analysis memorandum.13 Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed no later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.14 15 Parties who submit 

arguments are requested to submit with 

the argument: (1) A statement of the 

issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.16 Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.17

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must do so within 30 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

by submitting a written request to the 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance using Enforcement and 

Compliance’s ACCESS system.18

Requests should contain the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number, 

the number of participants, whether any 

participant is a foreign national, and a 

list of the issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

those raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs.19 If a request for a 

hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a time and date to 

be determined. Parties should confirm 

the date and time of the hearing two 

days before the scheduled date. Parties 

are reminded that all briefs and hearing 

requests must be filed electronically 

using ACCESS and received 

successfully in their entirety by 5:00 

p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the result of our analysis of 

the issues raised by the parties in their 

comments, no later than 120 days after 

the date of publication of this notice, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), unless this 

deadline is extended. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This administrative review and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213. 

Dated: June 30, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Period of Review 

IV. Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

V. Subsidies Valuation 

VI. Loan Benchmarks and Discount Rates 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
37740 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 134 / Friday, July 16, 2021 / Notices 

1See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 31, 2020; see 

also POSCO C&C’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review 

Request,’’ dated July 30, 2020; Hyundai Steel’s 

Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

July 21, 2020; and POSCO’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative 

Review Request,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

54983 (September 3, 2020). 

3On October 27, 2020, KG Dongbu Steel reported 

that it changed its name from Dongbu Steel to KG 

Dongbu Steel. See Dongbu’s Letter, ‘‘Affiliated 

Companies Response,’’ dated October 27, 2020. 

4See Memoranda, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for the 

Preliminary Results of the 2019 Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated March 4, 2021, 

and March 24, 2021, respectively. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019: Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from the Republic of 

Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

6See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

7See Appendix II. 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 

VII. Analysis of Programs 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–15123 Filed 7–15–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–879] 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products From the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review, 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

certain corrosion-resistant steel 

products (CORE) from the Republic of 

Korea. The period of review (POR) is 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable July 16, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dennis McClure or Joshua Simonidis, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5973 

and (202) 482–0608, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 21, 30, and 31, 2020, we 

received requests for multiple 

administrative reviews.1 On September 

3, 2020, Commerce published a notice 

of initiation of an administrative review 

of the countervailing duty (CVD) order 

on CORE from Korea.2 On October 6, 

2020, Commerce selected KG Dongbu 

Steel Co., Ltd. (KG Dongbu Steel) 

(formerly Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.)/ 

Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. 

(collectively, Dongbu) and Hyundai 

Steel Company as mandatory 

respondents in this administrative 

review.3

On March 4, 2021, and March 24, 

2021, Commerce extended the deadline 

for the preliminary results of this 

review.4

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.5 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included at the 

Appendix I to this notice. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is certain corrosion-resistant steel 

products. For a complete description of 

the scope of the order, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 

preliminarily determine that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution 

from an authority that gives rise to a 

benefit to the recipient, and that the 

subsidy is specific.6 For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected 

Companies Under Review 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not directly address the 

CVD rates to be applied to companies 

not selected for individual examination 

where Commerce limited its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the 

Act. However, Commerce normally 

determines the rates for non-selected 

companies in reviews in a manner that 

is consistent with section 705(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation. Section 777A(e)(2) of the 

Act provides that ‘‘the individual 

countervailable subsidy rates 

determined under subparagraph (A) 

shall be used to determine the all-others 

rate under section 705(c)(5) {of the 

Act}.’’ Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act 

states that for companies not 

investigated, in general, we will 

determine an all-others rate by weightaveraging the countervailable subsidy 

rates established for each of the 

companies individually investigated, 

excluding zero and de minimis rates or 

any rates based solely on the facts 

available. 

We preliminarily determine that 

Dongbu is the only mandatory 

respondent that received 

countervailable subsidies that are above 

de minimis. Therefore, we preliminarily 

determine to apply the net subsidy rate 

calculated for Dongbu to the nonselected companies. For a list of the 36 

companies for which a review was 

requested, and which were not selected 

as mandatory respondents or found to 

be cross-owned with a mandatory 

respondent, see Appendix II to this 

notice. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine the net 

countervailable subsidy rates to be: 

Producer/exporter 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent) 

KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (formerly Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.)/ 

Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., 

Ltd ........................................... 10.52 

Hyundai Steel Company ............. * 0.48 

Non-Selected Companies Under 

Review 7 .................................. 10.52 

* (de minimis). 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose to interested 

parties the calculations performed for 

these preliminary results within five 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of these 

preliminary results of review.8 Rebuttals 

to case briefs may be filed no later than 

seven days after the case briefs are filed, 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES