alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of Bullion River Gold Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial/Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated: April 14, 2008            By:  /s/ Peter Kuhn
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Peter Kuhn, President, Chief
                                      Executive Officer, Chief Accounting
                                      Officer and Director
# C_2019270EN.01001601.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 3 May 2019 — Crown Van Gelder B.V. v Autoriteit Consument en Markt

(Case C-360/19)

(2019/C 270/17)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Crown Van Gelder B.V.

Respondent: Autoriteit Consument en Markt

Question referred

Must Article 37(11) of Directive 2009/72/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC be interpreted as meaning that that provision also makes the right of complaint with regard to the operator of the national grid (transmission system operator) available to a party if that party has no connection to the grid of that national grid operator (transmission system operator) but has a connection only to a regional grid (distribution system) to which the transmission of electricity is interrupted as a result of a power cut on the national grid (transmission system) that feeds the regional grid (distribution system)?

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 211, p. 55.

---
# C_2019357EN.01000403.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 6 June 2019 — Ellmes Property Services Limited v SP

(Case C-433/19)

(2019/C 357/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ellmes Property Services Limited

Defendant: SP

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the first alternative in the first subparagraph of Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1)(‘Brussels Ia Regulation’) to be interpreted as meaning that actions brought by a co-owner seeking to prohibit another co-owner from carrying out changes to his property subject to co-ownership, in particular to its designated use, arbitrarily and without the consent of the other co-owners, concern the assertion of a right in rem? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the first alternative in the first subparagraph of Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1)(‘Brussels Ia Regulation’) to be interpreted as meaning that actions brought by a co-owner seeking to prohibit another co-owner from carrying out changes to his property subject to co-ownership, in particular to its designated use, arbitrarily and without the consent of the other co-owners, concern the assertion of a right in rem?

| 2. | If the first question should be answered in the negative:
  Is Article 7(1)(a) of the Brussels Ia Regulation to be interpreted as meaning that the actions referred to in paragraph 1 concern contractual obligations to be performed at the location of the property? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question should be answered in the negative:

Is Article 7(1)(a) of the Brussels Ia Regulation to be interpreted as meaning that the actions referred to in paragraph 1 concern contractual obligations to be performed at the location of the property?

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.

---
| Entity                                                              | Jurisdiction of Incorporation  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                                                                |                           |
| AAC Group Holding Corp.                                             | Delaware                       |
|                                                                |                           |
| AAC Holding Corp.                                                   | Delaware                       |
|                                                                |                           |
| American Achievement Corporation                                    | Delaware                       |
|                                                                |                           |
| American Achievement Corporation Subsidiaries:                      |                           |
| Commemorative Brands, Inc.                                          | Delaware                       |
|      Pulidos de Juarez, S.A. de C.V.            | Ciudad Juarez Chihuahua Mexico |
|      CBI North America, Inc.                    | Delaware                       |
| Taylor Senior Holding Corp.                                         | Delaware                       |
|      TP Holding Corp.                           | Delaware                       |
|      Taylor Publishing Company                  | Delaware                       |
|      Taylor Publishing Manufacturing, L.P. | Delaware                       |
|      Taylor Manufacturing Holdings, LLC         | Delaware                       |
| Educational Communications, Inc.                                    | Illinois                       |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 7, 2018

d1204 

# Order

Clerk December 7, 2018

158672

In re SIRBAUGH, Minors. SC: 158672

COA: 342369

Oakland CC Family Division:

2016

- 839704

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      14,502,000
<SECURITIES>                                85,810,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  966,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,956,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           107,494,000
<PP&E>                                       1,389,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 239,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             109,771,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,758,000
<BONDS>                                        330,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       214,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 102,469,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               109,771,000
<SALES>                                      1,290,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,290,000
<CGS>                                        5,783,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,694,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             169,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,332,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,332,000)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (1,019,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,351,000)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.25)
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of computing net loss per common share loss before extraordinary
item and net loss have been reduced by the accretion on preferred stock.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Amy E. Miles, certify that:

 

1.                            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of Regal Entertainment Group;

 

2.                            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

 

3.                            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 
| Date: March 22,   2017 | /s/ AMY E. MILES             |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                        | Amy E. Miles                      |
|                        | *Chief   Executive Officer*       |
|                        | *(Principal   Executive Officer)* |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 26, 2009

0624 

# Order

June 26, 2009

137652 (65)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137652 COA: 275215 Washtenaw CC: 05-001189-FH DAVID KIRCHER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion for reconsideration of this Court's May 1, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

K ELLY , C.J., and C AVANAGH and M ARKMAN , JJ., would grant the motion for reconsideration and would grant leave to a ppeal for the reasons set forth in Justice Markman’s dissenting statement in People v Kircher , ___ Mich ___ (Docket No. 137652, decided May 1, 2009).
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


        CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification By
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002), I, Gerhard Entzmann, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Quadriga
Capital Management, Inc., the general partner of Quadriga Superfund, L.P. (the
"Fund"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Fund.


                                        By: /s/ Gerhard Entzmann
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Gerhard Entzmann
                                            Secretary and Chief Financial
                                            Officer
                                            March 30, 2005


                                       45
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 08a0172n.06

Filed: March 28, 2008

Case No. 07-3669

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

BILL PAPPAS; CHRISTINE PAPPAS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN

DISTRICT OF OHIO

BEFORE: NORRIS, BATCHELDER, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. On December 17, 2000, Appellants’ home

suffered significant fire damage. Appellants had their homeowner’s insurance policy through State

Farm, which accepted coverage for the loss and paid Appellants $747,757.15 for repairs and

renovation of the home, personal property, and temporary housing. Thereafter, Appellants hired an

independent contractor to renovate their house, with State Farm monitoring the progress of the

project to determine Appellants’ need for additional living expenses. While monitoring the progress

of the renovation, State Farm’s estimator noticed that the independent contractor was not properly

abating the smoked, charred wood in Appellants’ home. State Farm, however, did not inform

Appellants of the problem. It is undisputed that making the proper repairs at the time State Farm’s

estimator perceived the deficiency would not have been unduly costly and Appellants claim that

making the repairs now will cost them $100,000.
2

Appellants filed suit in state court alleging that State Farm exhibited bad faith by failing to

inform them of the contractor’s deficient repair work. After removing the case to federal court on

diversity grounds, State Farm moved for summary judgment, arguing that Appellants failed as a

matter of law to demonstrate their claim for breach of the duty of good faith. On May 1, 2007, the

district court granted summary judgment for State Farm, finding that there were no genuine issues

of material fact and that had Appellants failed to establish a prima facie case that State Farm

breached its duty of good faith. Appellants timely appealed that decision.

After carefully reviewing the record, the law, and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the

district court’s opinion correctly sets out the applicable law and correctly applies the law to the facts

contained in the record. The issuance of a full written opinion by this court would serve no useful

purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                   ------------------------------------------


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Betsy Henley-Cohn and John S.
Tomac, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, of
BIW Limited (the "issuer"), do each hereby certify that the report on Form 10-K
accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.




/s/ Betsy Henley-Cohn
---------------------------
Betsy Henley-Cohn
Chairwoman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
BIW Limited

March 30, 2007



/s/ John S. Tomac
---------------------------
John S. Tomac
President and Treasurer
(chief financial officer)
BIW Limited

March 30, 2007
Exhibit 32.2



NANOGEN, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Nanogen Incorporated
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005 (the Report), I, Robert Saltmarsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                        
|---------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                 |  | 
|November 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ ROBERT SALTMARSH   
|                 |  |  |  | Robert Saltmarsh       
|                 |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael L. Campbell, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Regal Entertainment Group;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
February 25, 2008

| |  | By: |  | /s/MICHAEL L. CAMPBELLMichael L. Campbell
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.3

THANKSGIVING COFFEE COMPANY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sam KraynekSam Kraynek Chief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2011