alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                         |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Charles                    McBride  |   |   |        |
| Charles                    McBride           |   |   |        |
| Chief                      Financial Officer |   |   |   |
|                                         |   |   |   |
| January                      11, 2006        |   |   |   |
#### In the Matter of Christine Q. Q., Appellant, v Capital District Psychiatric Center, Respondent.

Weiss, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Trial Term (Conway, J.), entered December 13, 1984 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.39 for release from respondent’s confinement.

On the evening of November 26,1984, petitioner was involuntarily admitted to respondent under the emergency provision of Mental Hygiene Law § 9.39. On December 6,1984, petitioner, in an effort to obtain her release, petitioned for a court hearing pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.39 (a). A hearing date was set for December 11, 1984. In the interim, petitioner was involuntarily admitted pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.27, which provides for involuntary commitment upon the certification of two examining physicians and an application for admission executed by one of a number of qualified persons listed in the statute. As a result of this intervening admission, Trial Term held that petitioner’s application for a hearing was moot, since the emergency admission under section 9.39 had been superseded by the involuntary admission under section 9.27. Petitioner filed her notice of appeal from this dismissal on December 13,1984 and was subsequently released from confinement on December 21,1984. Respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot was denied without prejudice to the issue being raised on appeal.

Inasmuch as petitioner is no longer being confined by respondent, this appeal is moot *(see, Matter of Marsha W. W. v Capital Dist. Psychiatric Center,*103 AD2d 988; *People ex rel. Bousquet v Katz,*83 AD2d 533, *affd*55 NY2d 1025).

Appeal dismissed, as moot, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CHAD BATTERMAN,

Petitioner

v.

SILVIA SANTO,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 51 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
##### 



Exhibit 14.5 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS To the Board of Directors of
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (CVRD) We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the
Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File Nos. 333-109610; 333-109610-01) of
CVRD and Vale Overseas Limited (Vale Overseas); and (ii) the Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-110867; 333-10867-01) of CVRD and Vale
Overseas of our report dated January 17, 2003 on the consolidated financial
statements of ALUNORTE  Alumina do Norte do Brasil S.A. which appears in the
Annual Report on Form 20-F of CVRD and Vale Overseas for the year ended
December 31, 2003. June 4, 2004 /s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Scott, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Meyerson, J.), rendered April 19, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

This case arises out of the robbery of the driver of a livery car by his passenger when the vehicle stopped in a Brooklyn alleyway at the end of their trip. Defendant was arrested without a warrant on the day after the complainant identified him from a photo array. The arresting officer was a detective who knew defendant from a prior arrest and who entered defendant’s apartment with his consent. When defendant went into his bedroom to get dressed, the detective followed him and seized a hat lying on the dresser. The hat was introduced into evidence at the trial and was identified by the driver as the one worn by the robber.

As the detective’s entry into defendant’s apartment was not forcible *(cf. Payton v New York,*445 US 573), but voluntarily consented to *(see, Schneckloth v Bustamonte,*412 US 218), the detective’s following defendant into his bedroom after he was lawfully arrested pursuant to CPL 140.10 (1) (b) and seizing evidence in plain view was proper *(see, Washington v Chrisman,*455 US 1).

We have reviewed the trial testimony and found that the defendant’s proof reflected solely upon the credibility of the witnesses, who testified in detail, subject to extensive cross-examinations. Issues of credibility are primarily for the jury *(see, People v Gruttola,*43 NY2d 116, 122) and there was sufficient evidence to permit a rational trier of fact to conclude that defendant was guilty of robbery in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Don Stricklin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    L. Don Stricklin              
|L. Don Stricklin                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|March 30, 2005
#### Regency Club at Wallkill, LLC, Respondent, v Micheline Bienish, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 894]—

In an action to enforce a judgment by confession, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Ritter, J.), dated November 20, 2009, as, without a hearing, denied that branch of her motion which was to vacate the judgment by confession.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Generally, a person seeking to vacate a judgment entered upon the filing of an affidavit of confession of judgment must commence a separate plenary action for that relief *(see Posner v Posner,*277 AD2d 298 [2000]; *Rubino v Csikortos,*258 AD2d 638 [1999]; *Centurion Taxi v Beizem,*247 AD2d 502 [1998]; *L.R. Dean, Inc. v International Energy Resources,*213 AD2d 455 [1995]; *cf. McDonough v Bonnie Heights Realty Corp.,*249 AD2d 520 [1998]; *Cooper, Selvin & Strassberg v Soda Dispensing Sys.,*212 AD2d 498 [1995]). Under the circumstances here, the defendant’s contentions that the judgment by confession must be vacated on the grounds of fraud and breach of contract must be resolved in a plenary action.

Additionally, the statutory requirement that an affidavit of confession of judgment “[state] concisely the facts out of which the debt arose and [show] that the sum confessed is justly due” (CPLR 3218 [a] [2]) “ ‘is designed for the protection of third persons who might be prejudiced in the event that a collusively confessed judgment is entered, and not for the protection of the defendant’ ” *(Burtner v Burtner,*144 AD2d 417, 418 [1988], quoting *Mall Commercial Corp. v Chrisa Rest.,*85 Misc 2d 613, 614 [1976]). Therefore, the defendant may not challenge the judgment by confession on the ground that the specificity requirements of CPLR 3218 (a) (2) were not satisfied *(see Burtner v Burtner,*144 AD2d at 418). In any event, the record reflects that the affidavit was sufficiently particular so as to enable any interested third parties to investigate the claim and ascertain its validity *(see Wood v Mitchell,*117 NY 439, 441-442 [1889]; *Eurofactors Intl., Inc. v Jacobowitz,*21 AD3d 443, 445 [2005]; *cf. County Natl. Bank v Vogt,*28 AD2d 793 [1967], *affd*21 NY2d 800 [1968]).

*880Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to vacate the judgment by confession. Skelos, J.E, Dillon, Eng and Austin, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 134 (Friday, July 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37749-37750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15150]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
    Docket Numbers: RP21-956-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Pro Forma Tariff Records for GMS Go 
Live to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 7/6/21.
    Accession Number: 20210706-5045.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/19/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-957-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Compliance filing 202107 May 2021 Missed Deadline 
Imbalance to Storage.
    Filed Date: 7/6/21.
    Accession Number: 20210706-5052.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/19/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings

[[Page 37750]]

can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 8, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15150 Filed 7-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Vale Overseas Limited (the Company), does hereby
certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. Date: June 10, 2004 /s/ Fabio de Oliveira BarbosaName:
    Fabio de Oliveira BarbosaTitle:
    Director and Principal Executive Officer Date: June 10, 2004 /s/ Fernando Ramos NóbregaName:
    Fernando Ramos NóbregaTitle:
    Director and Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 870 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 870

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to modify oil and 
         hazardous substance liability, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2011

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to modify oil and 
         hazardous substance liability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pollution Accountability Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIABILITY.

    Section 311(b)(7) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1321(b)(7)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``, whichever amount 
        is higher'' before the period at the end; and
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ``, whichever amount 
        is higher'' before the period at the end.
                                 <all>
```
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This  agreement  is  to  amend  certain   provisions  of  that  certain
Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2002, by and between Young Innovations, Inc.
and George E.  Richmond  (the  "Agreement").  Terms used  herein but not defined
herein  shall  have the  meanings  ascribed  to such  terms as set  forth in the
Agreement.

         The second  sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement shall be amended and
restated as follows:

                  The term of this  Agreement  shall  automatically  extend  for
         successive  one  year  periods  (each  a  "SUCCESSIVE  TERM"),   unless
         terminated  by either  party at least  ninety  (90)  days  prior to the
         expiration of the Initial Term or any Successive Term.

         Agreed and accepted to this 14th day of May, 2002.

         YOUNG INNOVATIONS, INC.

         By: /s/ Arthur L. Herbst, Jr.
             -------------------------
         Its:  Chief Financial Officer


         /s/ George E. Richmond
         ----------------------
         George E. Richmond
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  NUMBER

  	
   

  	
  SEE
  LEGENDS ON REVERSE SIDE

  	
   

  	
  SHARES

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  C-

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  *                   *

  






 




	
  INCORPORATED
  UNDER THE LAWS

  	
   

  	
  OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

  






 


TROPICANA ENTERTAINMENT INC.


 


THIS CERTIFIES THAT SPECIMEN is the owner of                                                                                                                    full
paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of
Tropicana Entertainment Inc.


 


transferable on the books of the Corporation in
person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its
duly authorized officers and sealed with the Seal of the Corporation,


 


 


	
  this
                                                                  
  day

  	
   

  	
  of
                                                  ,
  A.D.,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Secretary

  	
   

  	
  President

  



 

















 


[COMMON STOCK LEGEND - TROPICANA ENTERTAINMENT INC.]


 


THE
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF
ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE OR
OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED UNLESS REGISTERED OR QUALIFIED UNDER SAID ACT AND
APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR UNLESS THE COMPANY RECEIVES AN OPINION OF
COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO IT THAT SUCH REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION
IS NOT REQUIRED.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Louis E. Prezeau, the Chief Executive Officer and President of City National
Bancshares Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: November 12, 2003


                                                   /s/ Louis E. Prezeau
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Louis E. Prezeau
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   and President

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Edward R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of
City National Bancshares Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated:  November 12, 2003

                                                   /s/ Edward R. Wright
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Edward R. Wright
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   and Senior Vice President
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott Sullinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation.



Date: June 10, 2005



By:

/s/ Scott SullingerName:

Scott SullingerTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         575
<SECURITIES>                                   18,377
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                   488
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35,408
<PP&E>                                         9,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 41,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,555
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       99
<OTHER-SE>                                     36,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   41,392
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,225
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (234)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                929
<INCOME-TAX>                                   345
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            584
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   584
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.05



</TABLE>
#### PEARCE V. BRILLIANT COAL CO.

*Damages.*

(Decided July 2, 1907.)

Appeal from Marion Chancery Court.

Heard before Hon. A. H. Benners.

Davis & Fite, for appellant.

Alex T. London, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Dismissed by agreement.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



         Pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, the undersigned officer of Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

         (1)      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  August 11, 2003


                     /s/ Steven A. Schmidt
                     -----------------------------------------------------------
                     Name:  Steven A. Schmidt
                     Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY
FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934