In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-20-00076-CV

KELLY COPLIN, Appellant

V.

GRANT MANN AND JENNIFER MANN, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. C-11268

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Pending before this Court is Appellant Kelly Coplin’s motion for new trial filed in 

accordance with Rule 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

34.6(f). Coplin contends that, although the reporter’s record has been filed, a significant portion 

of the record appears to have been lost or destroyed. Evidently, the record was recorded via 

digital audio recording, and the transcription of that recording, according to Coplin, “begins in 

the middle of direct examination of appellant and is missing all prior proceedings in the trial, 

including the admission of Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1–9.” 

Coplin further contends that the parties cannot agree whether or how the record can be

completed with reasonable certainty. 

Since Coplin has raised issues regarding the accuracy of the record after it has been filed 

in this Court, we will submit this dispute to the trial court for resolution under Rules 34.5(e) and 

34.6(e) and (f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(3), 34.6(e), 

(f). We hereby abate this matter to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing pursuant to 

Rules 35.5(3) and 34.6(e) and (f), for the purposes of (1) determining whether all portions of the 

record to which the parties are entitled have been provided to them and filed with this Court and 

(2) identifying and correcting, if possible, any inaccuracies or deficiencies in the reporter’s 

record. 

We instruct the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing within fifteen days of the 

date of this order and to enter findings regarding the following:
3

1. Precisely what portions of the record Coplin (or any other party) claims are 

missing and/or what parts of the record Coplin (or any other party) claims are inaccurate.

2. For each error or omission identified in response to number 1 above, whether the 

issue can be resolved by agreement as contemplated by Rules 34.5(e) or 34.6(e)(1) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure.

3. If such error or omission can be corrected by agreement, then the trial court is 

instructed to take steps to ensure that the record is corrected in accordance with the parties’ 

agreement.

4. If such error or omission cannot be corrected by agreement, then the trial court is 

instructed to take the steps outlined in Rules 34.5(e) and 34.6(e)(2) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure to resolve the dispute and correct the record.

5. For each error or omission identified in response to number 1 above, whether any 

missing exhibit or portion of the record has been lost or destroyed as contemplated by Rules 

34.5(e) and 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

6. For each exhibit or portion of the record that is determined to be lost or destroyed, 

if any, the trial court is instructed to take evidence on and enter findings regarding each of the 

four factors set out in Rule 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and to enter 

recommendations regarding whether the appellant is entitled to a new trial as a result of the lost 

or destroyed exhibit or portion of the record.
4

7. We also request that the trial court make any additional findings that it believes 

will be helpful to this Court in fully and finally resolving all issues related to the record in this 

matter.

The trial court’s findings, as set forth above, shall be entered into the record of the case 

and filed with this Court as a supplemental clerk’s record within ten days of the date of the 

hearing. The reporter’s record of the hearing, and any certified corrections to the reporter’s 

record under Rule 34.6(e)(2), shall be filed in the form of a supplemental reporter’s records

within ten days of the date of the hearing.

All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of the supplemental

record. We withdraw Coplin’s current briefing deadline and will, if necessary, establish a new 

briefing schedule once the case is returned to our jurisdiction from abatement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: November 19, 2020