alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 907 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 907

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the reduction in 
       the deductible portion of expenses for business meals and 
                             entertainment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2011

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the reduction in 
       the deductible portion of expenses for business meals and 
                             entertainment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCTION IN BUSINESS MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 274(n)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to only 50 percent of meal and entertainment expenses 
allowed as deduction) is amended by striking ``50 percent'' and 
inserting ``80 percent''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 274(n) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The heading for section 274(n) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Only 50 
Percent'' and inserting ``Portion''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 6 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 6

             To reform America's broken immigration system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Leahy, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Brown 
 of Ohio, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Bennet, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mrs. Boxer, and Mr. 
  Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To reform America's broken immigration system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reform America's Broken Immigration 
System Act''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE.

    It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should--
            (1) fulfill and strengthen our Nation's commitments 
        regarding border security;
            (2) pass legislation to support our national and economic 
        security, such as the DREAM Act, which would allow students who 
        came to America before turning 16 to earn citizenship by 
        attending college or joining the armed forces, and AgJobs, 
        which would help to ensure a stable and legal agricultural 
        workforce and protect the sustainability of the American 
        agricultural industry;
            (3) implement a rational legal immigration system to ensure 
        that the best and brightest minds of the world can come to the 
        United States and create jobs for Americans while, at the same 
        time, safeguarding the rights and wages of American workers;
            (4) require all United States workers to obtain secure, 
        tamper-proof identification to prevent employers from hiring 
        people here illegally, and toughen penalties on employers who 
        break labor and immigration laws;
            (5) hold people accountable who are currently here 
        illegally by requiring them to either earn legal status through 
        a series of penalties, sanctions, and requirements, or face 
        immediate deportation; and
            (6) adopt practical and fair immigration reforms to help 
        ensure that families are able to be together.
                                 <all>
```
#### RUSSELL, Appellant, v. WALWORTH, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate. Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by Edgar A. Russell against George S. Walworth.

No opinion. Judgment and order of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
# C_2019172EN.01001201.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 15 February 2019 — ZS v PVA Landesstelle Salzburg

(Case C-118/19)

(2019/C 172/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Salzburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ZS

Defendant: PVA Landesstelle Salzburg

The case was removed from the register of the Court of Justice by order of the President of the Court of 22 March 2019.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Norton Industries Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Jianjun Zhang, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

    1.   the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: July 21, 2004


/s/ Jianjun Zhang
------------------------
Jianjun Zhang, President
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 868 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 868

  To restore the longstanding partnership between the States and the 
          Federal Government in managing the Medicaid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2011

  Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Burr, Mr. 
Coburn, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Johanns, and Mr. Kyl) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To restore the longstanding partnership between the States and the 
          Federal Government in managing the Medicaid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Flexibility Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICAID AND CHIP MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REQUIREMENTS 
              UNDER ARRA AND PPACA.

    (a) Repeal of ARRA Medicaid MOE.--Subsection (f) of section 5001 of 
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5) 
is amended by striking paragraph (1).
    (b) Repeal of PPACA Medicaid MOE.--Section 1902 of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a) is amended by striking subsection (gg).
    (c) Repeal of PPACA CHIP MOE.--Section 2105(d)(3) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397ee(d)(3)) is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (A);
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; and
            (3) in the paragraph heading, by striking ``Continuation of 
        eligibility standards for children until october 1, 2019'' and 
        inserting ``Continuity of coverage''.
    (d) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1396a(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (74).
            (2) Effective January 1, 2014, the paragraph (14) of 
        section 1902(e) added by section 2002(a) of Public Law 111-148 
        is amended by striking the third sentence of subparagraph (A).
    (e) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (d)(2), the 
amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50744

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS MANUEL FLORES-AVILA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-49-ALL

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Manuel Flores-Avila

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50744

2

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Willem Fuchter, the President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director of Constitution Mining Corp., and Kenneth Phillippe, the Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Constitution Mining Corp., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Constitution Mining Corp., for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Constitution Mining Corp.



| | "Willem Fuchter"Willem FuchterPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director
Date:  April 15, 2008      
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | "Kenneth Phillippe"Kenneth PhillippeSecretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  April 15, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Constitution Mining Corp. and will be retained by Constitution Mining Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 408 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 408

   To provide for the temporary retention of sole community hospital 
           status for a hospital under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2011

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the temporary retention of sole community hospital 
           status for a hospital under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Hospital Jobs Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY RETENTION OF MEDICARE SOLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL STATUS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, effective for 
discharges occurring during the 3-year period beginning on October 1, 
2010, in the case of a hospital with Medicare provider number 51-0047, 
the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall deem such hospital to 
meet the criteria for classification as a sole community hospital under 
section 1886(d)(5)(D)(iii)(II) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(d)(5)(D)(iii)(II)).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit12.01**

CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. Mervyn Jacobson certify that:

1.             I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 20-F of Genetic Technologies Limited;

2.             Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made and, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, is not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The Company’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this reportany change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5.             The Company’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 21st, 2006
|   | /s/ Dr. Mervyn Jacobson  |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |                     |   |
|   | **Dr.  Mervyn Jacobson** |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 302 has been provided to Genetic Technologies Limited andwill be retained by Genetic Technologies Limited and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### Ann Marie Wienges, Respondent, v Newburgh Mall, LLC, et al., Appellants.

[942 NYS2d 612]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated May 17, 2011, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

This action arose from a slip-and-fall at one of the stores located at the defendant Newburgh Mall, LLC, which is owned by the defendant Newburgh Capital Group, LLC, and managed by the defendant Urban Retail Properties, LLC (hereinafter Urban Retail). On October 31, 2007, the plaintiff was working at a store known as Wilson’s Leather when she slipped and fell on a puddle in the store’s back room, which resulted from a leak in the store’s ceiling.

The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that they did not create the alleged dangerous condition, nor did they have actual or constructive notice of the alleged dangerous condition. The Supreme Court denied defendants’ motion.

A defendant moving for summary judgment in a slip-and-fall action is “required to demonstrate as a matter of law that [it] maintained the subject property in a reasonably safe condition and neither created the alleged dangerous condition nor had actual or constructive notice thereof” *(Stryker v D’Agostino Supermarkets Inc.,*88 AD3d 584, 584 [2011]; *Ross v Betty G. Reader Revocable Trust,*86 AD3d 419 [2011]).

The defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by making a prima facie showing that they did not have constructive notice of the alleged dangerous condition of the ceiling. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. There was no showing that the leak had existed for a sufficient period of time for the defendants to have acquired constructive notice *(see Anderson v Central Val. Realty Co.,*300 AD2d 422 [2002]; *Matcovsky v Days Hotel,*10 AD3d 557 [2004]). Moreover, although the plaintiff showed that there had been leaks in another part of the store for about three months, “[m]ere notice of a general or unrelated problem is not *1111enough; the particular defect that caused the damage must have been apparent” *(Hayes v Riverbend Hous. Co., Inc.,*40 AD3d 500, 500 [2007]; *see Chianese v Meier,*98 NY2d 270 [2002]; *Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp.,*84 NY2d 967 [1994]; *Anderson v Central Val. Realty Co.,*300 AD2d 422 [2002]). Here, the leak in the other part of the store was insufficient to charge the defendants with constructive notice of the leak that caused the plaintiff to fall *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836 [1986]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Balkin, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.* Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than July 28, 2021.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis* (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

1. *The Ronald G. Chamberlin Irrevocable Trust, Nathan A. Wurm and Eric D. Wurm, as co-trustees, The Irrevocable Gifting Trust FBO Nathan A. Wurm, Nathan A. Wurm, as trustee, and The Irrevocable Gifting Trust FBO Eric D. Wurm, Eric D. Wurm, as trustee, all of Caledonia, Minnesota;* to join the Wurm Family Control Group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Eitzen Independents, Inc., Eitzen, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of ESB Bank, Caledonia, Minnesota.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 7, 2021.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-14781 Filed 7-12-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB-A1 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), we, Nicole Leigh van Coller, President, and Christopher R. Ebersole, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated: 5-25-07                         /s/Nicole Leigh van Coller ----------                       -------------------------- Nicole Leigh van Coller President  Dated: 5-25-07                         /s/Christopher R. Ebersole ----------                       -------------------------- Christopher R. Ebersole CFO