alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 4

          To make America the world's leader in clean energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
    Kerry, Mr. Bennet, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Coons, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 
Lautenberg, Mrs. Shaheen, and Mr. Akaka) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To make America the world's leader in clean energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Make America the World's Leader in 
Clean Energy Act''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE.

    It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should--
            (1) promote investment in clean energy jobs and industries;
            (2) free the United States from dependence on oil, 
        especially foreign oil;
            (3) reduce costs and pollution by promoting energy 
        efficiency;
            (4) promote clean energy by retooling the infrastructure 
        and workforce of the United States;
            (5) ensure the Federal Government is a leader in reducing 
        pollution, promoting the use of clean energy sources, and 
        implementing energy efficient practices;
            (6) reduce harmful energy-related air, land, and water 
        pollution; and
            (7) eliminate wasteful tax subsidies that promote 
        pollution.
                                 <all>
```
Amendment No. 1 to Statement of Work Number 8 to Goods Agreement



 Exhibit 10.154 
 

 
 3039 E CORNWALLIS RD 
 RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK NC 27709-2195 
 October 3, 2009  
 Mr. Mike Harrison 
 Brocade Communications
Systems, Inc. 
 1745 Technology Drive 
 San Jose, CA 95110 
 Subject: Amendment 1 to SOW#8 of the IBM/Brocade Goods Agreement ROC-P-68 
 This letter (the “Amendment”) serves as Amendment Number 1 to SOW#8, including all amendments thereto (“SOW#8”) of the Goods
Agreement ROC-P-68 (the “Agreement”), which the parties hereto do mutually agree to amend as follows 
 1. Delete “SOW #8,
Attachment A” in its entirety and replace with the attached “SOW #8, Attachment A” 
 2. The effective date of this Amendment
shall be the date on the top of this Amendment (the “Effective Date”). 
 The parties acknowledge that they have read this Amendment,
understand it, and agree to be bound by its terms and conditions. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Goods Agreement or the SOW #8. All other terms and conditions of the Goods Agreement and SOW#8 that
are unaffected by the revisions set forth in this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. Further, the parties agree that this Amendment and the Goods Agreement and SOW#8 are the complete and exclusive statement of the agreement between the
parties, superseding all proposals or other prior agreement, oral or written, and all other communications between the parties relating to this subject. 
  

											
	Accepted and Agreed To:	    	Accepted and Agreed To:
		
	International Business Machines Corporation	    	Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
						
	By:	  	 /s/ Michelle B. Wright
	  	 8/5/09
	    	By:	  	 /s/ Charles Leeming
	  	8/4/09
	Authorized Signature	  	Date	    	Authorized Signature	  	Date
				
	 Michelle B. Wright
	  		    	 Charles Leeming
	  	
	Type or Print Name	  		    	Type or Print Name
				
	 GCM, Storage OEM Procurement
	  		    	 VP, OEM Sales
	  	
	Title & Organization	  		    	Title & Organization

  

							
	Address:	 		    	Address:	  	1745 Technology Drive
		 		    		  	San Jose, CA 95110

  








					
	Accepted and Agreed To:
	
	Brocade Communications Switzerland, SarL
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin L. McKenna
	 	 Aug. 4, 2009

	Authorized Signature	 	Date
		
	 Kevin L. McKenna
	 	
	Type or Print Name	 	
		
	 Director
	 	
	Title & Organization	 	









 SOW 8 Attachment A 
 Products and Pricing – 
 [**] Pages 3-49 have been omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2011, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, Principal Financial Officer of New Jersey
Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: August 17, 2011

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCHFred W. Brackebusch,
Principal Financial Officer

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. ***

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMVEL MKHOYAN; LIANA

GRIGORYAN,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72501

Agency Nos. A098-848-407

A098-848-408

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2012** 

San Francisco, California

Before: TROTT, RAWLINSON, and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges. *** 

Petitioners Samvel Mkhoyan and Liana Grigoryan seek review of a final

order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA

FILED

DEC 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 Petitioners filed their application after May 11, 2005, and therefore the 1

REAL ID Act applies to this case. See Zhiqiang Hu v. Holder, 652 F.3d 1011, 1017

n.5 (9th Cir. 2011). 

Page 2 of 3

affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) adverse credibility determination and denial

of their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

Convention Against Torture (CAT).1

1. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination

given Mkhoyan’s implausible explanations for the factual inconsistencies in his

testimony and his failure to provide corroborating evidence. See Shrestha v.

Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1047-48 (9th Cir. 2010). 

2. Substantial evidence supports denial of Mkhoyan’s asylum application,

because he failed to establish that his mistreatment constituted persecution and was

on account of his political opinion. Although Mkhoyan was detained overnight and

beaten by the police, we have held that single, isolated encounters with the

authorities do not constitute past persecution. See Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339

(9th Cir. 1995); Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1018, 1020-21 (9th Cir. 2006).

Further, the evidence does not compel a finding that his political opinion was a
Page 3 of 3

central reason for his mistreatment, given that he was detained for refusing to

vacate the military base. See Zhiqiang Hu, 652 F.3d at 1017. 

3. Because Mkhoyan failed to establish eligibility for asylum, his application

for withholding of removal also fails. See Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 854

(9th Cir. 2009), as amended (“[A]n alien who fails to satisfy the lower standard of

proof required to establish eligibility for asylum necessarily fails to establish

eligibility for withholding of removal.”) (citation omitted). 

4. Because Mkhoyan’s application for CAT relief was premised on the same

evidence as his asylum and withholding of removal claims, CAT relief was

properly denied. See Cortez-Pineda v. Holder, 610 F.3d 1118, 1125 (9th Cir.

2010). 

PETITION DENIED.
#### HARPER et al., Respondents, v. BOARD OF SUP’RS OF CLINTON COUNTY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by George W. Harper and another against the board of supervisors of Clinton county and others.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with usual leave to defendant to answer on payment of costs of demurrer and of this appeal.
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 897 

AN ACT 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 

of 1977 to clarify that uncertified States and Indian 

tribes have the authority to use certain payments for 

certain noncoal reclamation projects and acid mine remediation programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 897 ES

1 SECTION 1. ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION. 

2 (a) RECLAMATION FEE.—Section 402(g)(6)(A) of 

3 the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 

4 (30 U.S.C. 1232(g)(6)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and 

5 section 411(h)(1)’’ after ‘‘paragraphs (1) and (5)’’. 

6 (b) FILLING VOIDS AND SEALING TUNNELS.—Sec7 tion 409(b) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclama8 tion Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1239(b)) is amended by in9 serting ‘‘and section 411(h)(1)’’ after ‘‘section 402(g)’’. 

10 (c) USE OF FUNDS.—Section 411(h)(1)(D)(ii) of the 

11 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 

12 U.S.C. 1240a(h)(1)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘sec13 tion 403’’ and inserting ‘‘section 402(g)(6), 403, or 409’’. 

Passed the Senate November 2, 2011. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 897 

AN ACT 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Recgrams. lamation projects and acid mine remediation pro- use certain payments for certain noncoal rec- States and Indian tribes have the authority to lamation Act of 1977 to clarify that uncertified
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norman Jackson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marlow, J.), rendered June 18, 1984, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree, and violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2); § 1128 (a), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review that branch of defendant’s pretrial motion as sought suppression of physical evidence (Delaney, J.).

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant was stopped and arrested for driving while intoxicated and a subsequent search of his person revealed aluminum foil packets believed by the officers to contain cocaine. The *413search of defendant’s car was proper upon the facts of this case because “the police had a reasonable belief that the vehicle was, in some way, associated with the crime and that a search of the vehicle would ‘produce the fruits, instrumentalities, contraband or evidence’ of the crime” *(People v Clark,*45 NY2d 432, 438, quoting *People v Lewis,*26 NY2d 547, 552). Additionally, the search of the box and gym bag found in the vehicle’s trunk was proper because “[i]f probable cause justifies the search of a lawfully stopped vehicle, it justifies the search of every part of the vehicle and its contents that may conceal the object of the search” *(United States v Ross,*456 US 798,825; *People v Ellis,*62 NY2d 393, 398). Furthermore, under the circumstances of this case, the fact that defendant’s car was transported to police headquarters and then searched does not affect the validity of the search *(United States v Johns,*469 US_, 105 S Ct 881; *People v Orlando,*56 NY2d 441, 446).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.
# C_2020077EN.01001502.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/15

---

Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-180/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot

(Case C-587/19 P)

(2020/C 77/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: L’Oréal (represented by T. de Haan and P. Péters, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office and Guinot

By order of 7 October 2019, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) ruled that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED
STOCK DIVIDENDS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND 2003
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
 Restated
    
    
    Restated2004
    
    
    2003(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    375,232
    
    
    $
    335,581Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    176,125
    
    
    
    160,316Fixed charges
    
    
    732,510
    
    
    
    717,236Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (35,282
    )
    
    
    (36,159
    )Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    $
    1,248,585
    
    
    $
    1,176,974Preferred dividend requirements
    
    $
    2,861
    
    
    $
    3,891Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    147
    %
    
    
    148
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    $
    4,206
    
    
    $
    5,759Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    697,228
    
    
    
    671,131Capitalized interest
    
    
    35,282
    
    
    
    36,159Interest factor of rents
    
    
    
    
    
    
    9,946Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    732,510
    
    
    
    717,236Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    736,716
    
    
    $
    722,995Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(A) divided by (B)
    
    
    1.70x
    
    
    
    1.64xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends(A) divided by (C)
    
    
    1.69x
    
    
    
    1.63x
 -33-
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Zwiren, the
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
      September
      10, 2008




/s/
                DANIEL ZWIREN


Daniel
      Zwiren


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 1.12 CERTIFICATE OF NAME CHANGE FROM FIRST EMPIRE MUSIC CORP. TO NOBLE HOUSE FILM & TELEVISION INC. DATED JANUARY 21, 2005



For Ministry Use Only

Ontario Ministry of Consumer and Business Services

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that these articles are effective on

JANUARY 21 JANVIER, 2005

/s/Beverly Hawton

Beverly Hawton

Director, Business Corporations Act



Ontario Corporation Number

1573905



Form 3 Business Corporations Act



ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT



1.  The name of the corporation is:  (Set out in BLOCK CAPITAL LETTERS)



FIRST EMPIRE MUSIC CORP.



2.  The name of the corporation is changed to (if applicable):  (Set out in BLOCK CAPITAL LETTERS)



NOBLE HOUSE FILM & TELEVISION INC.



3.  Date of incorporation/amalgamation:



2003-05-21

(Year, Month, Day)



4.  Complete only if there is a change in the number of directors or the minimum/maximum number of directors.



Number of directors is/are:  or  minimum and maximum number of directors is/are:



Number  or  minimum and maximum



5.  The articles of the corporation are amended as follows:



IT IS RESOLVED THAT THE CORPORATIONS NAME BE CHANGED TO NOBLE HOUSE FILM & TELEVISION INC.



6.  The amendment has been duly authorized as required by sections 168 and 170 (as applicable) of the Business Corporations Act.



7.  The resolution authorizing the amendment was approved by the shareholders/directors (as applicable) of the corporation on



2005-Jan-20

(Year, Month, Day)



These articles are signed in duplicate.



FIRST EMPIRE MUSIC CORP.

(Name of Corporation)(If the name is to be changed by these articles set our current name)



By:  /s/Kam Shah

Kam Shah

CFO
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Joan Katzeff, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:                                               |  | October 8, 2003 
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|By:                                                 |  | /s/ Joan Katzeff
|Joan Katzeff, President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 786 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 786

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the appointment and 
        grade of the Chief of the Army Medical Specialist Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 12, 2011

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the appointment and 
        grade of the Chief of the Army Medical Specialist Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPOINTMENT AND GRADE OF CHIEF OF THE ARMY MEDICAL 
              SPECIALIST CORPS.

    Section 3070(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``captain'' and 
        inserting ``lieutenant colonel''; and
            (2) by inserting after the first sentence the following new 
        sentence: ``An appointee who holds a lower regular grade shall 
        be appointed in the regular grade of brigadier general.''.
                                 <all>
```