alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019206EN.01002201.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 27 February 2019 — OI v Air Nostrum Lineas Aereas del Mediterraneo SA

(Case C-191/19)

(2019/C 206/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: OI

Defendant and respondent: Air Nostrum Lineas Aereas del Mediterraneo SA

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the change in reservation of a passenger at check-in, who has a confirmed reservation on a specific flight, to a later flight against his will constitute denied boarding within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation, (1) if the flight on which the passenger had a confirmed reservation is then carried out? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the change in reservation of a passenger at check-in, who has a confirmed reservation on a specific flight, to a later flight against his will constitute denied boarding within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation, (1) if the flight on which the passenger had a confirmed reservation is then carried out?

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Does Article 5(1)(c)(iii) of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation apply by analogy in the event of denied boarding within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Does Article 5(1)(c)(iii) of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation apply by analogy in the event of denied boarding within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

March 29, 2004


        Management Report on Internal Control over the administration of
       the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2002-1 (the "Owner Trust")

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank") is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over its Administration
of the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner
Trust ("Administration" of the Owner Trust), which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper Administration of the Owner Trust. The
Bank's internal control system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions
are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to Administration of the Owner Trust. Further, because of
changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its internal control over
its Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003 in relation to the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained effective internal
control over the Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003,
based on the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ Keith Schuck
-------------------------
Keith Schuck
Senior Vice President/CFO
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

/s/ Patricia Garvey
-------------------------
Patricia Garvey
Senior Vice President
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      43,549,904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,899,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                   701,000
<INVENTORY>                                    399,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,568,438
<PP&E>                                      12,334,094
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,448,386)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,350,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     (29,353,295)
<BONDS>                                    (6,800,000)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (164,824)
<OTHER-SE>                                (35,257,569)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              (66,350,850)
<SALES>                                   (21,236,237)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          (26,197,535)
<CGS>                                        2,531,994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,735,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,041,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             643,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,886,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,903,292)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,789,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,789,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
        

</TABLE>
#### LANCASTER CO. v. MARIA L. CLARK. [In re Opening of Broad Street.]

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF QUARTER SESSIONS OF LANCASTER COUNTY.

Submitted May 24, 1889

Decided October 7, 1889.

Before Sterrett, Green, Clark, Williams, McCollum and Mitchell, JJ. •

No. 83 July Term 1889, Supt. Ct.; court below, No. 21 April Term 1879, Q. S., and No. 56 August Term 1882, C. P.

This case was an award of damages to Maria L. Clark, caused by the opening of Broad street, in the city of Lancaster, followed by an issue and judgment in the Court of Common Pleas, certified back to the Court of Quarter Sessions, and rule granted therein. The contention arose upon substantially the same pleadings and the same facts, as in Lancaster Co. y. Frey and *603Lancaster Co. v. Kendig, preceding this case, and the assignments of error were the same.

*Mr. George A.*Lane, County Solicitor, *Mr. A. F. Hostetter*and *Mr. W. F.*Beyer, for the plaintiff in error.

*Mr. A. S.*Johns, County Solicitor, *Mr. W. T.*Brown, City Solicitor, for the defendant in error.

Opinion,

Mr. Justice Clark:

For reasons given ill our opinion filed in the matter of the assessment of damages to Jacob L. Frey, in the opening of First street in the city of Lancaster, [ante, p. 598,] the proceedings of the Court of Quarter Sessions

Are affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     Three Months      Period from
                                        Ended         Inception to
                                    September 30,     September 30,
                                        1997              1997
                                    -------------------------------
<S>                                 <C>               <C>
Primary:
     Average shares outstanding:                 1                1
                                         =========        =========
 
Net loss                                 $(152,000)       $(457,000)
                                         =========        =========
 
Net loss per share                       $(152,000)       $(457,000)
                                         =========        =========
 
Fully Diluted:
     Average shares outstanding:                 1                1
                                         =========        =========
 
Net loss                                 $(152,000)       $(457,000)
                                         =========        =========
 
Net loss per share                       $(152,000)       $(457,000)
                                         =========        =========
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Joel Boyarski, the Principal
Financial Officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q/A of WorldGate
Communications, Inc., for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, which this
certification accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
information contained in the Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of WorldGate Communications, Inc.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WorldGate and will be
retained by WorldGate and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





Dated:
      March 31, 2010
            
            /s/Joel
      BoyarskiJoel
      BoyarskiChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GenoMed, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Dr. David Moskowitz,
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Executive Officer
and President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Dr. David Moskowitz
Dr. David Moskowitz
President/Chief Executive Officer/Chairman of the Board/Chief
Financial Officer/Chief Accounting Officer

Dated: April 20, 2004
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs BARC Public Field Day





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Field Day 2007headline bar Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Public Field Day Photo GalleryPhoto Galleries From Other Years2010 | **2007** | 20052004 | 2003 | 20021999-01Gallery HomeField Day Information


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Periodic Report**Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officerof Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the undersigned’sknowledge: (1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 5, 2008      /s/ Terrance D. Paul   Name:  Terrance D. Paul   Title:  Chief Executive Officer  THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 16 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.16
                                          Agreed to May 31, 2011        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF 
              KING KAMEHAMEHA.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on June 5, 2011, to celebrate the 
birthday of King Kamehameha.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
cc: Herminio Ramirez-Lopez 

Attorney General/Carson City 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

- v;:a
# C_2021206EN.01002202.xml

| 31.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Bende v EUIPO — Julius-K9 (K-9)

(Case T-878/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark K-9 - Relative grounds for refusal - Signs which have become customary - Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 206/28)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Gábor Bende (Beloinannisz, Hungary) (represented by: R. Tóth, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Julius-K9 Zrt. (Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary) (represented by: G. Jambrik, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 October 2019 (Case R 560/2018-2), as corrected on 12 March 2020, relating to invalidity proceedings between Mr Bende and Julius-K9.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Gábor Bende to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Gábor Bende to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2303

ELI YECHESKEL; KAREN YECHESKEL, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal From the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-10938) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1999 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eli Yecheskel, Karen Yecheskel, Appellants Pro Se. William Sears Estabrook, III, Loretta C. Argrett, Tamara Wenda Ashford, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Stuart L. Brown, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the tax court’s orders upholding the determination by Internal Revenue of a deficiency in their 1992 income taxes. We have reviewed the record and the tax court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Yecheskel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , No. 95-10938 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 20, 1997; May 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2020339EN.01001601.xml

| 12.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Welmax +. v EUIPO — Valmex Medical Imaging (welmax)

(Case T-305/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark welmax - Earlier EU word mark valmex - Time limits for an appeal before the Board of Appeal - Delay - Point from which time starts to run - Notification - Proof of dispatch by registered post - Communication by email - Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the time limit - Appeal deemed not to have been filed - Scope of the requests for regularisation - Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Articles 23 and 56 to 58 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

(2020/C 339/19)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Welmax + sp. z o.o. sp.k. (Poznań, Poland) (represented by: M. Machyński, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Valmex Medical Imaging GmbH (Augsbourg, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 March 2019 (Case R 2245/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Valmex Medical Imaging and Welmax +.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Welmax + sp. z o.o. sp.k. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Welmax + sp. z o.o. sp.k. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
PERIOD ENDING APRIL 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,722,833
<SECURITIES>                                   150,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,958,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,000
<INVENTORY>                                    317,719
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,182,629
<PP&E>                                         213,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,255,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,686,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,563,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,255,438
<SALES>                                      9,492,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,492,429
<CGS>                                        7,670,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,670,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,093,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                   418,320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            675,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   675,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>