alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED PRIOR PERIOD FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE TO REFLECT THE TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK
SPLIT EFFECTED FEBRUARY 26, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,124
<SECURITIES>                                   107,876
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,124
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,002
<PP&E>                                          14,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,496
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,915
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,395
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,517
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                  H.J. HEINZ FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     Following are the subsidiaries of H.J. Heinz Finance Company (the
"Company"), other than those which if considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary would not constitute a significant subsidiary, and the state or
country in which each subsidiary was incorporated or organized. The accounts of
each of the listed subsidiaries are a part of the Company's consolidated
financial statements.

<Table>
<Caption>
                         SUBSIDIARY                            STATE OR COUNTRY
                         ----------                            ----------------
<S>                                                            <C>
H.J. Heinz Company, L.P. ...................................       Delaware
</Table>
Porter Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Incentive Compensation Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.13 
 PORTER BANCORP, INC. 
 POLICY STATEMENT

 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION BONUS PLAN 
 FOR SENIOR LEADERSHIP 
 EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
2008 
 OBJECTIVE 
 This Plan is designed to attract and retain excellent employees and to align the interests of our employees with the interests of our stockholders. The plan shall reward and promote performance based upon predetermined and defined
measurable objectives. It further has been designed to reward above-average performance and to enhance risk-management procedures of the bank. 
 NOTE: The goal metrics are attached to document as Exhibit A. Peer metrics will be used for Banks identified in Exhibit B. 
 SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM AND DESIGNATED MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL 
 The Senior Leadership Team and designated management
personnel (as designated by the Board of Directors in the organizational Board meeting) can earn up to 30% of their salary based upon the bank’s performance. Each point scored translates to 1% of salary. 
 SUPPLEMENTAL SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM BONUS - $5,000 
 The Senior Leadership Team will be eligible for an additional bonus of $5,000 if EPS increases 10% or more over the prior year. 







 Exhibit A 
 Sr. Leadership Team and Designated Management Personnel 
  

									
	 	  	% Points	  	Level 1 Target	 	% Points	  	Level 2 Points
	 EPS
	  	3	  	105%xPrior Year	 	6	  	110%xPrior Year
	 ROAA
	  	3	  	Peer	 	6	  	110%xPeer
	 ROAE
	  	3	  	Peer	 	6	  	110%xPeer
	 NIM
	  	3	  	Peer	 	6	  	110%xPeer
	 Efficiency
	  	3	  	Peer	 	6	  	Peer/110%
		  	 	  		 		  	
	 Total Possible Incentive
	  	15	  		 	30	  	
		  	 	  		 	 	  	

 Supplemental Senior Leadership Team Cash Bonus 
  

						
	 	  	Target	 	Bonus
	 EPS (PBIB)
	  	110% of Prior Year	 	$	5,000








 Exhibit B 
 PBIB Comparable Peer Group 
  

	 	•	 	 Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation 


  

	 	•	 	 Community Bank Shares of Indiana, Inc. 


  

	 	•	 	 Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 


  

	 	•	 	 Farmers Capital Bank Corporation 


  

	 	•	 	 First Financial Service Corporation 


  

	 	•	 	 Integra Bank Corporation 


  

	 	•	 	 Republic Bancorp, Inc. 


  

	 	•	 	 S.Y. Bancorp, Inc.
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                               [Young Letterhead]


                                                March 19, 2002




U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.

     Re:   AUDIT BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Young Innovations, Inc. has engaged Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent
public accountants. Arthur Andersen has represented to Young Innovations, Inc.
that the audits were subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control systems for
the U.S. accounting and auditing practices to provide reasonable assurance that
the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that
there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on audits
and availability of national office consultation. Arthur Andersen has informed
Young Innovations, Inc. that the availability of personnel at foreign affiliates
of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to conduct the audit.



                                       Sincerely,



                                       Arthur L. Herbst, Jr.
                                       Executive Vice President of Strategic
                                       Planning and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated March 7, 2011, with respect to the financial statements, schedule and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Computer Programs andSystems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-97431,effective July 31, 2002 and File No. 333-131165, effective January 20, 2006). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 7, 2011
Helvetia Asset Recovery, 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 22, 2014

No. 04-14-00569-CV

Burton KAHN,

Appellant

v.

HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-18355

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Consolidate Appeal is DENIED.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23.1


Stan J.H. Lee, CPA
(a member firm of DMHD Hamilton Clark & Co.)
2182 Lemoine Avenue                                      Tel: 760-612-1269
Suite 200                                                Fax: 815-846-7550
Fort Lee, NJ 07024                              e-mail: stanL@dmhdxcpa.com






To the Board of Directors
and Management of
Norton Industries Corporation
Edison, NJ


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT



I hereby consent to the use of my report dated March 24, 2003 relating to
the independent auditor's reports and audited interim financial statements of
Norton Industries Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and for the period
beginning March 8, 2002 (Inception) to December 31, 2002 as appears in such
Form 10-K in the Company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.


/s/ Stan J.H. Lee, CPA/s/
-------------------------
Stan J.H. Lee, CPA
Fort Lee, New Jersey
March 24, 2003
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 21.2

                  Subsidiaries and Joint Venture of Registrant

             TB Wood's Corporation, Subsidiaries, and Joint Venture
                                December 27, 2002

Registrant: TB Wood's Corporation (Delaware)

  Subsidiary: TB Wood's Incorporated (Pennsylvania)

     Subsidiaries: Plant Engineering Consultants, Inc. (Tennessee)

                   T.B. Wood's Canada Ltd. (Canada)

                   Industrial Blaju, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)

                   TB Wood's Foreign Investment Company (Delaware)

                      Subsidiary: TB Wood's (Deutschland) GmbH (Germany)

                                 Subsidiaries: Berges electronic GmbH (Germany)

                                               Berges electronic S.r.l. (Italy)

                  TB Wood's Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware)

            Joint Venture: TB Wood's (India) Private Limited (India)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50850 Conference Calendar

NICHOLAS CASTILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JACK KYLE ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-325

- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Nicholas Castillo appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit as frivolous. He argues that the district court erred in determining that the change in the interval in his parole review did not run afoul the Ex Post Facto Clause. We have reviewed the record and determined that the district court did not abuse its discretion. Allison v. Kyle , 66 F.3d 71, 73-74 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.
# C_2022340EN.01002702.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — Puigdemont i Casamajó and Comín i Oliveres v Parliament

(Case T-388/19) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Members of the European Parliament - Refusal of the President of the Parliament to recognise the status of Member of the European Parliament and the associated rights of elected candidates - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 340/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó (Waterloo, Belgium), Antoni Comín i Oliveres (Waterloo) (represented by: P. Bekaert, G. Boye, S. Bekaert, lawyers, and by B. Emmerson QC)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, T. Lukácsi and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Gavela Llopis, acting as Agent)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of, first, the Instruction of 29 May 2019 of the President of the European Parliament refusing them access to the special welcome and assistance service offered to incoming Members of the European Parliament and the grant of temporary accreditation and, second, the refusal of the President of the Parliament to recognise their status as Members of the European Parliament, contained in the letter of 27 June 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Mr Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Antoni Comín i Oliveres to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament, including the costs in Cases T-388/19 R, C-646/19 P(R) and T-388/19 R-RENV; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Antoni Comín i Oliveres to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament, including the costs in Cases T-388/19 R, C-646/19 P(R) and T-388/19 R-RENV;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.

---
#### Jonas VELASCO-ROJAS, Petitioner, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Respondents.

No. 11-10144

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Oct. 6, 2011.

Rodrigo Vilar, Vilar & Solano, P.A., Miami, FL, for Petitioner.

David Bernal, Eric Holder, Jr., Krystal Samuels, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice Eoir, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, Michelle Ressler, District Counsel’s Office Usice, Miami, FL, for Respondents.

Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jonas Velasco-Rojas petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his motion to reconsider.

After the immigration judge determined that Velasco-Rojas was neither entitled to asylum nor eligible for cancellation of removal, he appealed to the BIA. In his appeal he argued that the IJ abused its discretion in failing to consider his membership in a particular social group. The BIA dismissed his appeal, however, finding that he did not define the social group or provide a persuasive argument for disturbing the IJ’s decision. Velasco-Rojas then filed a motion to reconsider with the BIA in which he argued that the BIA had failed to consider that he was persecuted on the basis of his political opinion. The BIA denied Velasco-Rojas’ motion to reconsider, reasoning that his arguments in that motion related only to a political opinion claim and did not assert a specific error with respect to the BIA’s previous deter*502mination that he did not belong to a particular social group.

We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider for an abuse of discretion. *Calle v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,*504 F.3d 1324, 1328 (2007). “Our review is limited to determining whether the BIA exercised its discretion in an arbitrary or capricious manner.” *Jiang v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,*568 F.3d 1252, 1256 (11th Cir.2009). An alien may file a motion requesting that the BIA reconsider a prior decision, but that motion must specify the errors of law or fact in the BIA’s previous order and must be supported by pertinent authority. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Velasco-Rojas’ motion to reconsider. Contrary to his argument, the BIA did not improperly refuse to consider his political opinion claim, which Velasco-Roj as did not present to the BIA in his initial appeal. His motion to reconsider did not specify any errors of law or fact in the BIA’s previous order.

PETITION DENIED.
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU TECHNOLOGIES**Certification of President and Principal Financial Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the			registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's Annual			Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-KSB")			fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities			Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB,			fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results			of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: April 13, 2007
			 By: /s/ Hideyuki Shiraishi					Hideyuki Shiraishi					President and Principal Financial Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 9, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00625

- CV

F. C., Jr. and A. R., Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUN TY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the decree terminating parental rights signed by the tr i a l court on

August 20, 2019

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that

there was no reversible error in the decree

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s decree

of terminati o n

. Because appellant s are indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
EXHIBIT 31.2



                                CERTIFICATION



I, Hua Meng, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dahua Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respect the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

    a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

    b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

    a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.


August 9, 2005


/s/ Hua Meng
-----------------------
Hua Meng
Chief Financial Officer
### **EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

 

# **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-87691) pertaining to the 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the 1996 StockOption Plan and the 1999 Stock Option Plan of Technology Flavors &Fragrances, Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-48218) andrelated Prospectus of our report dated March 19, 2002, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Technology Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31,2001.

 

                                                                                                                                                                /s/Ernst & Young LLP

 

 

 

Melville, New York

March26, 2002
# **EXHIBIT 23**

 

CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-92725 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1985 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Employee Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, the 1993 Non-Employee Directors Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, the 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan and the Employee Gift Program, and No. 333-130791 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. 2005 Restricted Stock Grant Plan, of our report dated March 3, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc., which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

 

/s/CroweHorwath LLP

CroweHorwath LLP

 

Louisville,Kentucky

March 30,2009

 

----