alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019280EN.01002901.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de prud’hommes de Metz (France) lodged on 18 June 2019 — Syndicat CFTC du personnel de la Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de la Moselle v Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de Moselle

(Case C-463/19)

(2019/C 280/39)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil de prud’hommes de Metz

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Syndicat CFTC du personnel de la Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de la Moselle

Defendant: Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de Moselle

Other party: Mission nationale de contrôle et d’audit des organismes de sécurité sociale

Question referred

Should Directive 2006/54/EC (1) read in conjunction with Articles 8 and 157 TFEU, the general EU law principles of equal treatment and of the prohibition of discrimination, and Articles 20, 21(1) and 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as meaning that the provisions of Article 46 of the French national collective agreement for social security bodies, which grant female employees of social security organisations raising children on their own three months leave with half pay, one and a half months leave with full pay and unpaid leave of up to a year after maternity leave, are excluded from the scope of application of that directive?

---

(1)  Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast) (OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23).

---
# C_2019413EN.01002402.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 16 August 2019 — Ge.Fi.L. — Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA v Regione Campania

(Case C-618/19)

(2019/C 413/29)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ge.Fi.L. — Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA

Defendant: Regione Campania

Question referred

Does a provision of regional legislation, such as Article 1(121) of Law No 16 of the Campania Region of 7 August 2014 which awards directly to the [Automobile Club d’Italia], without a tender procedure, a contract for services relating to the management of the tax on vehicles of the Campania Region infringe [European Union] law and, in particular, the principle of free movement of services and the principle of opening up to competition as far as possible in the field of public service contracts?

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's ad hoc Committee on Nominating the NSB Class of 2022-2028, hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE: 

Monday, July 19, 2021, from 5:00-6:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National                               ( print page 37196)                            Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.                    

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda of the teleconference is: To discuss NSB Class of 2022-2028 nominee cumulative rankings and arrive at a short list. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                         Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​notices.jsp#sunshine.*                         Please refer to the National Science Board website                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for general information.                    

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2021-15089 Filed 7-12-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Calinda, Appellant.

[943 NYS2d 903] —

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J.), imposed May 27, 2009, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Hall, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 9, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128641 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

THOMAS J. PASSARO and HOWARD H. Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, KAHNE, Justices Plaintiff-Appellees, 

v SC: 128641 

 COA: 257553 

Berrien CC: 2003-003281-CZ 

TAGLIA, FETTE, DUMKE & WHITE, P.C., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. 

t1102 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 9, 2005 

Clerk
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for
the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Durham, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul DurhamPaul DurhamChief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting OfficerDate: April 30, 2009
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Yonglin Du, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Dahua Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   March 28, 2007



|                              | 
|----------------------------- | 
|/s/ Yonglin Du                | 
|Yonglin Du, President & CEO   | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc.
and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), I, G. Edward Evans, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                |  |  |  |  |  |                                        
|------ |  | -------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|       |  |                |  | 
|Dated: |  | March 30, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    G. EDWARD EVANS                 
|       |  |                |  |  |  |  |  | G. Edward Evans Chief Executive Officer



The above
certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
# C_2020095EN.01001301.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 6 November 2019 — Stichting Cartel Compensation, Equilib Netherlands BV v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV and Others

(Case C-819/19)

(2020/C 95/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Stichting Cartel Compensation, Equilib Netherlands BV

Defendants: Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV, Martinair Holland NV, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Lufthansa Cargo AG, British Airways plc, Société Air France SA, Singapore Airlines Ltd, Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV, Martinair Holland NV, Société Air France SA, Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd, Singapore Airlines Ltd, Lufthansa Cargo AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Swiss International Air Lines AG, British Airways plc, Air Canada, Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd, SAS AB, Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark-Norway-Sweden, SAS Cargo Group A/S, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV, Martinair Holland NV, Société Air France SA, Lufthansa Cargo AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, British Airways plc

Question referred

In a dispute between injured parties (in the present case shippers, recipients of air cargo services) and air carriers, do the national courts have the power — either because of the direct effect of Article 101 TFEU, or at least of Article 53 EEA, or on the basis of (the direct effect of) Article 6 of Regulation 1/2003 (1) — to fully apply Article 101 TFEU, or at least Article 53 EEA, with regard to agreements/concerted practices of air carriers in respect of freight services on flights operated before 1 May 2004 on routes between airports within the EU and airports outside the EEA, or, before 19 May 2005, on routes between Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and airports outside the EEA, or, on flights operated before 1 June 2002, between airports within the EU and Switzerland, also for the period that the transitional regime of Articles 104 and 105 TFEU applied, or does the transitional regime preclude that?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

          - [Document Identifier: CMS-10341]

# AGENCY:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; partial withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

On Friday, July 9, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a notice entitled, “Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request.” That notice invited public comments on three separate information collection requests specific to document identifiers: CMS-10215, CMS-10249, and CMS-10341. Through the publication of this document, we are withdrawing the portion of the notice requesting public comment on the information collection request titled “Section 1115 Demonstration Projects Regulations at 42 CFR 431.408, 431.412, 431.420, 431.424, and 431.428.” Form number CMS-10341 (OMB control number 0938-1162). The withdrawn information collection request will be replaced by another 30-day notice in July or August of this year.

# DATES:

For CMS-10215 and CMS-10249, the original comment period for the notice that published on July 9, 2021, remains in effect and ends August 9, 2021.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In FR document, 2021-14671, published on July 9, 2021 (86 FR 36281), we are withdrawing item 3 “Section 1115 Demonstration Projects Regulations at 42 CFR 431.408, 431.412, 431.420, 431.424, and 431.428” which posted on page 36282.

Dated: July 9, 2021.

William N. Parham, III,

Director, Paperwork Reduction Staff, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2021-15005 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-60107

_____________________

TIMOTHY R. WILSON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NELSON HALL CHEVROLET, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants,

NELSON HALL CHEVROLET, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Mississippi

(4:93-CV-83-LN)

_________________________________________________________________

January 12, 1996

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-appellant Nelson Hall Chevrolet, Inc. appeals the

district court's judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee Timothy R.

Wilson. Having reviewed the record and briefs of the parties, we

affirm the district court's entry of judgment in favor of Wilson on

all issues except the award of interest. 
 

1We dismiss Wilson's motion to supplement the record on appeal

as moot.

-2-

The district court erred in awarding, as compensatory damages,

the full amount of interest Wilson paid on the note used to finance

the purchase of the automobile. The jury appears to have

determined that $6,000.00 was the actual value of the automobile at

the time of purchase. Wilson's trade-in allowance was $2,431.09,

which when subtracted from the actual value of the car leaves

$3,568.91 as the amount of the indebtedness on which Wilson was

lawfully obligated to pay interest. Thus, any interest Wilson paid

on that amount is not a component of the damages suffered by Wilson

on account of Nelson Hall's conduct. We therefore REVERSE only

that portion of the judgment constituting the interest on that

amount and REMAND for recalculation of damages based on the

foregoing.

AFFIRMED in part and 

REVERSED and REMANDED in part.1
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 488 

To require the FHA to equitably treat homebuyers who have repaid in 

full their FHA-insured mortgages, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2011 

Mr. CARDIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the FHA to equitably treat homebuyers who 

have repaid in full their FHA-insured mortgages, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reduce Excessive In5 terest Payments Act’’ or the ‘‘REIP Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTEREST CHARGES FOR ON-TIME 

7 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS. 

8 Section 203 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 

9 1709) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 488 IS

1 ‘‘(z) PROHIBITION ON INTEREST CHARGES FOR ON2 TIME PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS.—Each mortgagee (or 

3 servicer) with respect to a mortgage under this section 

4 may not impose, nor may the Secretary require the imposi5 tion of, any interest charge on such a mortgage as a result 

6 of the loss of any time period provided by the mortgagee 

7 (or servicer) within which the mortgagor may fully repay 

8 the principal balance amount of the mortgage, with re9 spect to— 

10 ‘‘(1) any days in the billing cycle that precedes 

11 the most recent billing cycle in which such amounts 

12 were repaid; or 

13 ‘‘(2) any amounts repaid in the current billing 

14 cycle that were repaid within such time period.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Heriberto FRAGOSO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-50631.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.*

Filed Jan. 6, 2009.

USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kathryn A. Young, Esq., FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GOODWIN, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*60MEMORANDUM **

Heriberto Fragoso appeals from the 322-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), and use or carrying of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Fragoso contends that his sentence is unreasonable in light of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We conclude that the sentence is substantively reasonable. *See Gall v. United States,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 598-602, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); *see also United States v. Stoterau,*524 F.3d 988, 1001-02 (9th Cir. 2008); *United States v. Plouffe,*445 F.3d 1126, 1131-32 (9th Cir.2006).

With regard to Special Condition 5 of his supervised release, Fragoso contends that the district court erred by: (1) delegating to the probation officer the authority to make him pay all or part of the costs of drug or alcohol treatment; and (2) disregarding his inability to pay. These contentions are foreclosed. *See United States v. Soltero,*510 F.3d 858, 864-65 (9th Cir.2007); *United States v. Dupas,*419 F.3d 916, 922-24 (9th Cir.2005).

Finally, Fragoso requests a remand to correct the written judgment so that it conforms with the district court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing that any financial contribution toward the cost of drug or alcohol treatment be conditioned upon his ability to pay. We remand for the limited purpose of correcting the written judgment in this regard. *See United States v. Hicks,*997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir.1993).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct judgment.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### In re MUEHLFELD et al. In the matter of Frank Muehlfeld and another.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November Term, 1897.)

No opinion. Motion granted so far as to direct restitution of books of account. See 45 N. Y. Supp. 16.