alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Converted by EDGARwiz


 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARKS #6 LLC
 8320 NE HWY. 99

VANCOUVER, WA. 98665
 
TELEPHONE (360) 566-8192
 
FAX (360) 546-1737
 

 January 21, 2009



 Powin Corporation

6975 SW Sandburg Road #326
 Tigard OR 97223



 0



 RE: Reconciliation of real Property Taxes



 Dear Tenant:



 After the reconciliation for the 08-09 tax year for Tri-County Industrial Park, there is a balance due in the sum of $520.40.



 Please remit the sum of $520.40 to our office with your February 2009 rent,



 Copies of the tax billings for the 08-09 tax years are enclosed as well as a breakdown of assessments for each building at Tri-County Industrial Park.



 For your information, following is the formula used to determine you pro rata share of the taxes due per the terms of your lease with Tri-County Industrial Parks #6 LLC.



 Building Taxes



 1.            Building 12 is 7.95% of tax lot 1500

2.            Taxes due on Building 12 are $4,826.74

3.            Your pro rata share of the building 76.920%

4.             $4,826.74 x 76.920% = $3,712.73



 Land Taxes



 1.

Taxes on the land are $70,291.27

2.

Your percent of the land is
 2.660%
 3.

$70,291.27 x 2.660%= $1,869.75



 Summary



 Tenants tax due on building:

(2008-2009)

$

3,712.73
 Tenants tax due on land:

(2008-2009)

$

1,869.75
 Sub total

$

5,582.48
 Less tax paid

(2007-2008)

$

5,062.08
 Total Due

$ 

520.40
 


 01/28/09, CK#1419 ($563.77)



 


 

Page 2
 Reconciliation of Real Property Taxes



 According to this reconciliation, the following amount is due February 1, 2009 and each month thereafter until further notice:



 Rent

$

4,200.00
 CAM

$

619.62
 Taxes

$ 

465.21
 Road Maintenance

$

85.23
 Insurance

$

62.18
 Water

$

14.02
 Sewer

$

103.12
 Total Due

$       5,549.38 - 5506.01 = 43.37

01/28/09, CK#1417 ($563.77)



 Prompt payment of this bill will be greatly appreciated. A 1 1/2 % monthly service charge, or the maximum allowed by law, will be charged on the unpaid balance.



 If you have any questions you may contact our office at the above number.



 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC.



 By:/s/Tom Howie



 Tom Howie, Leasing Coordinator



 Enclosures
 


 Cc: Accounting
#### James A. ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENBRIER CHRYSLER, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-1209.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2011.

Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.

James A. Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Childers North, LeClair Ryan, PC, Williamsburg, Virginia; Nancy Blackburn Sasser, LeClair Ryan, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James A. Rose appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action ■without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 64(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Rose seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
# C_2022128EN.01001602.xml

| 21.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Pilatus Bank and Pilatus Holding v ECB

(Case T-27/19) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Indictment of the main shareholder in a third country - Criterion of good repute - Perception of good repute by the market - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality - Rights of the defence)

(2022/C 128/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Pilatus Bank plc (Ta’Xbiex, Malta), Pilatus Holding Ltd. (Ta’Xbiex) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, M. Puidokas and A. Karpf, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, A. Nijenhuis and A. Steiblytė, Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the ECB of 2 November 2018 withdrawing the authorisation of Pilatus Bank to take up the business of a credit institution.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding Ltd. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding Ltd. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB);

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of National Energy Services  Company,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending October 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Larry A. Shusman,  Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent thereof) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Larry A. Shusman
-------------------------
Larry A. Shusman
Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent thereof)
October 31, 2003
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 188/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 188 |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 65ό έτος10 Μαΐου 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 188

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

65ό έτος10 Μαΐου 2022

---

| Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- |
| | Διορθωτικά |
| | Διορθωτικό στην περίληψη των αποφάσεων της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής σχετικά με τις χορηγήσεις αδειών για τη διάθεση στην αγορά με σκοπό τη χρήση και/ή για τη χρήση ουσιών που απαριθμούνται στο παράρτημα XIV του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1907/2006 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, για την καταχώριση, την αξιολόγηση, την αδειοδότηση και τους περιορισμούς των χημικών προϊόντων (REACH) [Δημοσιεύεται σύμφωνα με τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1907/2006 άρθρο 64 παράγραφος 9 (2022/C 131/05) ( EE C 131 της 24.3.2022 ) | 1 |

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

Διορθωτικά

Διορθωτικό στην περίληψη των αποφάσεων της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής σχετικά με τις χορηγήσεις αδειών για τη διάθεση στην αγορά με σκοπό τη χρήση και/ή για τη χρήση ουσιών που απαριθμούνται στο παράρτημα XIV του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1907/2006 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, για την καταχώριση, την αξιολόγηση, την αδειοδότηση και τους περιορισμούς των χημικών προϊόντων (REACH) [Δημοσιεύεται σύμφωνα με τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1907/2006 άρθρο 64 παράγραφος 9 (2022/C 131/05) ( EE C 131 της 24.3.2022 )

( EE C 131 της 24.3.2022 )

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

Διορθωτικά

| 10.5.2022 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 188/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 188/1

---

Διορθωτικό στην περίληψη των αποφάσεων της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής σχετικά με τις χορηγήσεις αδειών για τη διάθεση στην αγορά με σκοπό τη χρήση και/ή για τη χρήση ουσιών που απαριθμούνται στο παράρτημα XIV του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1907/2006 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, για την καταχώριση, την αξιολόγηση, την αδειοδότηση και τους περιορισμούς των χημικών προϊόντων (REACH) [Δημοσιεύεται σύμφωνα με τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1907/2006 άρθρο 64 παράγραφος 9 (2022/C 131/05)

(
  Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης C 131 της 24ης Μαρτίου 2022
  )

(2022/C 188/01)

Στη σελίδα 5, στη δεύτερη στήλη του πίνακα:

αντί:

«27 Μαρτίου 2022»

διάβαζε:

«17 Μαρτίου 2022».

---
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER OF THE COMPANY

I, George J. Drazenovic, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Tornado
  Gold International Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 23, 2007

/s/ George J.
DrazenovicGeorge
J. Drazenovic Chief Financial Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1 
<CASH>                                           74,949 
<SECURITIES>                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10,034 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        353 
<INVENTORY>                                           0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                141,790 
<PP&E>                                          366,772 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (54,728)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  918,918 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            45,069 
<BONDS>                                               0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0 
<PREFERRED>                                     115,965 
<COMMON>                                            114 
<OTHER-SE>                                      (44,346)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    918,918 
<SALES>                                           4,322 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 36,920 
<CGS>                                             1,788 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    56,153 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 28,402 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    500 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               27,829 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (50,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (50,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  15,763 
<CHANGES>                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (50,729)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (4.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (4.90)
                                               


</TABLE>
# C_2020399EN.01003201.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe)

(Case T-401/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Freude an Farbe in yellow, orange, red, pink, violet, blue, turquoise, dark green, light green and anthracite - Earlier figurative EU trade mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2020/C 399/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Brillux GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) (represented by: R. Schiffer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Synthesa Chemie GesmbH (Perg, Austria) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 March 2019 (Case R 1498/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Synthesa Chemie and Brillux.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Brillux GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Brillux GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 26, 2024

No. 04

- 23

- 00399

- CR

EX PARTE Johny Misael PEREZ DOBLANDO

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10603CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS Johny Misael Perez Doblando’s appeal of the denial of his application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. We further consider Perez Doblando’s appeal as a petition fo r writ of mandamus and

DENY his request for mandamus relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on June 26, 2024

.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of June, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada , Chief Deputy Clerk
# C_2019399EN.01003501.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/35

---

Action brought on 9 October 2019 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union

(Case C-743/19)

(2019/C 399/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio, I. Anagnostopoulou, and C. Biz, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Decision (EU) 2019/1199 of 13 June 2019; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Decision (EU) 2019/1199 of 13 June 2019; (1)

| — | order Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its first plea in law, the Parliament claims that the author of the contested decision, be it the Council or all the Member States, does not have the power to determine the location of the seat of the European Labour Authority (ELA). The Parliament is of the opinion that:

Article 341 TFEU does not constitute an appropriate legal basis to determine the seat of bodies of the European Union such as decentralised agencies. In the present case, ELA was established by the EU legislature by Regulation (EU) 2019/1149, (2) adopted on the basis of Articles 46 and 48 TFUE by means of the ordinary legislative procedure. The Parliament considers that Article 341 TFEU cannot withdraw from the scope of competence of the EU legislature, which established ELA, the power to decide on the location of its seat, by attributing it instead to the Member States, and that therefore that provision cannot validily serve as the legal basis for the contested decision.

By the second plea in law, raised in the alternative in the event that the Court were to find that Article 341 TFEU provides an appropriate legal basis for the contested decision, the Parliament seeks to claim that that decision is vitiated by an absolute failure to state reasons. The Parliament considers that, as a legal act of the European Union, the constested decision is subject to the obligation to state reasons laid down in the second paragraph of Article 296 TFUE, which was not fulfilled in any way, since it utterly fails to specify the reasons why the city of Bratislava was chosen to host the seat of ELA.

---

(1)  Decision (EU) 2019/1199 taken by common accord between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 13 June 2019 on the location of the seat of the European Labour Authority (OJ 2019 L 189, p. 68).

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2019/1149 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 establishing a European Labour Authority, amending Regulations (EC) No 883/2004, (EU) No 492/2011, and (EU) 2016/589 and repealing Decision (EU) 2016/344 (OJ 2019 L 186, p. 21).

---
# C_2020077EN.01001201.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen (Belgium) lodged on 16 April 2019 — YU v Wallonische Region

(Case C-315/19)

(2020/C 77/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: YU

Defendant: Wallonische Region

By order of 26 September 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) gives the following ruling:

Article 45 TFEU is to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State pursuant to which an employee residing in that Member State can rely on an exception to the obligation to register in the employee’s Member State of residence a vehicle, which has been made available to the employee by an employer established in a different Member State where the vehicle is registered, only if the documents proving that the condition for the exception is met are at all times carried by the employee in the vehicle.

---
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 Written
Statement of Principal Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 as
Adopted by
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert V. McLemore,
President and Founder, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:
 
 (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition as of December 31, 2004 and results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company and its
subsidiaries.
 
 ****Date: March 30,
2005
    By:
    /s/ Robert V.
    McLemoreName: Robert V. McLemoreTitle:  President and
      Founder (Principal Executive
Officer)
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.