alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021128EN.01003401.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Sophia Group v Parliament

(Case T-578/19) (1)

(Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of assistance services for buildings - Rejection of a tenderer’s offer - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Selection criteria - Award criteria - Most economically advantageous tender - Use of labels and certifications in the formulation of award criteria - Obligation to state reasons)

(2021/C 128/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sophia Group (Saint-Josse-ten-Noode, Belgium) (represented by: Y. Schneider and C.-H. de la Vallée Poussin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Tapper Brandberg and B. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 30 July 2019 to award Lot No 1 of the tender for the ‘Provision of Buildings HelpDesk services’ (Call for tenders 06A 0010/2019/M011) to another tenderer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sophia Group to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sophia Group to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Hal M. Krisbergh, the Principal Executive Officer of WorldGateCommunications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of WorldGate Communications,Inc., for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, which this certificationaccompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and informationcontained in the March 31, 2006 Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of WorldGateCommunications, Inc.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to WorldGate and will be retained by WorldGate and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: May 10, 2006 |   | /s/ HAL M.  KRISBERGH          |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                |   | Hal M.  Krisbergh              |
|                |   | Chief  Executive Officer       |
|                |   | (Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

----
# C_2020019EN.01003301.xml

| 20.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/33

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 4 November 2019 — Danske Bank A/S v Skatteverket

(Case C-812/19)

(2020/C 19/34)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Danske Bank A/S, Danmark, Sverige Filial

Defendant: Skatteverket

Question referred

Does a Swedish branch of a bank established in another Member State constitute an independent taxable person where the principal establishment supplies services to the branch and imputes the costs thereof to the branch, if the principal establishment is part of a VAT group in the other Member State, while the Swedish branch is not a member of any Swedish VAT group? (1)

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
# C_2021009EN.01001601.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Electrolux Home Products v EUIPO — D. Consult (FRIGIDAIRE)

(Case T-583/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark FRIGIDAIRE - Genuine use - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 9/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Electrolux Home Products, Inc. (Charlotte, North Carolina, United States) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: D. Consult (Wattignies, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 June 2019 (Case R 166/2018-5), relating to revocation proceedings between D. Consult and Electrolux Home Products.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Electrolux Home Products, Inc., to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Electrolux Home Products, Inc., to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 721 

To appropriate such funds as may be necessary to ensure that members 

of the Armed Forces, including reserve components thereof, continue 

to receive pay and allowances for active service performed when a funding 

gap caused by the failure to enact interim or full-year appropriations 

for the Armed Forces occurs, which results in the furlough of nonemergency personnel and the curtailment of Government activities and 

services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2011 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To appropriate such funds as may be necessary to ensure 

that members of the Armed Forces, including reserve 

components thereof, continue to receive pay and allowances for active service performed when a funding gap 

caused by the failure to enact interim or full-year appropriations for the Armed Forces occurs, which results 

in the furlough of non-emergency personnel and the curtailment of Government activities and services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 721 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Pay for Our 

3 Military Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS TO PRO5 VIDE PAY AND ALLOWANCES FOR MEMBERS 

6 OF THE ARMED FORCES DURING FUNDING 

7 GAP IMPACTING THE DEPARTMENT OF DE8 FENSE OR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SE9 CURITY. 

10 (a) APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR MILITARY PAY

11 AND ALLOWANCES.—During a funding gap impacting the 

12 Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Treasury shall make 

13 available to the Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary 

14 of Homeland Security in the case of the Coast Guard), 

15 out of any amounts in the general fund of the Treasury 

16 not otherwise appropriated, such amounts as the Secretary 

17 of Defense (and the Secretary of Homeland Security in 

18 the case of the Coast Guard) determines to be necessary 

19 to continue to provide pay and allowances (without inter20 ruption) to members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Ma21 rine Corps, and Coast Guard, including reserve compo22 nents thereof, who perform active service during the fund23 ing gap. 

24 (b) FUNDING GAP DEFINED.—In this section, the 

25 term ‘‘funding gap’’ means any period of time after the 

26 beginning of a fiscal year for which interim or full-year 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 721 IS

1 appropriations for the personnel accounts of the Armed 

2 Forces for that fiscal year have not been enacted. 

3 (c) DURATION OF TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—No 

4 transfer may be made by the Secretary of the Treasury 

5 under subsection (a) after December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 855 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 855

To make available such funds as may be necessary to ensure that members 
of the Armed Forces, including reserve components thereof, continue to 
receive pay and allowances for active service performed when a funding 
gap caused by the failure to enact interim or full-year appropriations 
   for the Armed Forces occurs, which results in the furlough of non-
 emergency personnel and the curtailment of Government activities and 
                               services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 2011

 Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Mrs. Hutchison, and Mr. Casey) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                           on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make available such funds as may be necessary to ensure that members 
of the Armed Forces, including reserve components thereof, continue to 
receive pay and allowances for active service performed when a funding 
gap caused by the failure to enact interim or full-year appropriations 
   for the Armed Forces occurs, which results in the furlough of non-
 emergency personnel and the curtailment of Government activities and 
                               services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pay Our Troops Act''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY FUNDING FOR PAY AND ALLOWANCES FOR MEMBERS OF THE 
              ARMED FORCES DURING FUNDING GAP IMPACTING THE DEPARTMENT 
              OF DEFENSE OR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

    (a) Funds for Military Pay and Allowances.--During a funding gap 
impacting the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Treasury shall make 
available to the Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary of Homeland 
Security in the case of the Coast Guard), out of any amounts in the 
general fund of the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such amounts 
as the Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary of Homeland Security in 
the case of the Coast Guard) determines to be necessary to continue to 
provide pay and allowances (without interruption) to members of the 
Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, including reserve 
components thereof, who perform active service during the funding gap.
    (b) Funding Gap Defined.--In this section, the term ``funding gap'' 
means any period of time after the beginning of a fiscal year for which 
interim or full-year appropriations for the personnel accounts of the 
Armed Forces for that fiscal year have not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019328EN.01000301.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2019 — Blumar SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate

(Case C-415/19)

(2019/C 328/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte Suprema di Cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Blumar SpA

Respondent: Agenzia delle Entrate

Question referred

Are Article 1(1223) of Law No 296 of 27 December 2006 (now Article 16a(11) of Law No 11 of 4 February 2005) and the Decree of the President of the Council of Ministers of 23 May 2007 compatible with EU law, with reference to Article 108(3) TFEU as interpreted in Deggendorf, Commission Decision C(2008) 380, and the Community-law principle of proportionality?

---
#### Barbara M. Chosed, Respondent, v Lloyd Chosed, Appellant.

— In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated February 28, 1985, as directed him to pay the plaintiff wife the sum of $150 per week as maintenance and $150 per week in child support, pendente lite, and further restrained him from disposing of or transferring certain assets, pendente lite, (2) so much of an order of the same court, dated April 16, 1985, as upon granting his cross motion for reargument, adhered to its original determination, and (3) a judgment of the same court, dated April 23, 1985, which is in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $3,555.51, for arrears.

Appeal from the order dated February 28, 1985 dismissed. Said order was superseded by the order dated April 16, 1985, made upon reargument.

Order dated April 16, 1985 affirmed, insofar as appealed from.

Judgment affirmed.

Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

After reviewing the record, we find that Special Term correctly awarded plaintiff a total of $300 per week as temporary maintenance and child support. Due consideration was given to plaintiff’s needs as well as defendant’s ability to provide for those needs *(see, Stern v Stern,*106 AD2d 631; *Van Ess v Van Ess,*100 AD2d 848; *Rossman v Rossman,*91 AD2d 1036). Moreover, as has been noted on numerous occasions, the remedy for any alleged inequities in a pendente lite award is a speedy trial, at which a more detailed examination of the facts and circumstances of the parties may be conducted *(see, Jorgensen v Jorgensen,*86 AD2d 861).

*691We further reject defendant’s claim that he is entitled to a credit for expenditures made by him subsequent to the issuance of the order dated February 28, 1985. The absence of any proof that defendant made any expenditures for which he should now receive a credit proves fatal to this claim.

Defendant’s last objection is to Special Term’s restraining him from disposing of or transferring certain assets, pendente lite. It is evident from the record that defendant has exclusively controlled virtually all of the family’s finances throughout the marriage. Under the circumstances, it was appropriate for Special Term to have enjoined any attempt by the defendant to dispose of assets in his name in order to deprive plaintiff of any portion thereof. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Fiber, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU TECHNO HOLDINGS**Certification of President and Principal Financial Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the			registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's Annual			Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-K")			fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities			Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K,			fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results			of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: November 23, 2009
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, & Chief Financial Officer
#### Orlando B. Hastings et al., Appellants, *v.*The Giles Lithographic Company, Respondent.

(Argued April 25, 1890;

decided May 9, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made January 29,1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit.

*Flamen B. Oandler*for appellants.

*John Frankenhewner*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2021009EN.01001602.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA)

(Case T-643/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA - Genuine use of the mark - Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered - Use in the form in which the mark was registered - Use with the proprietor’s consent - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 9/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dermavita Co. Ltd (Beirut, Lebanon) (represented by: D. Todorov, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, V.J. Ruzek, and K. Zajfert, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Allergan Holdings France (Courbevoie, France) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor, and T. de Haan, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2019 (Joined Cases R 1655/2018-4 and R 1723/2018-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Dermavita Co. and Allergan Holdings France.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dermavita Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dermavita Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| 3. | Orders Allergan Holdings France to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Allergan Holdings France to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.

---
Exhibit 10.1


 


December 18,
2009


 


Board of Directors


GT Solar International, Inc.


243 Daniel Webster Highway


Merrimack, NH 
03054


 


Subject:  Resignation


 


Dear Board Members:


 


This
letter shall serve as confirmation that I hereby resign from my position as a
Director of GT Solar International, Inc. 
This resignation shall become effective upon its acceptance by the Board
of Directors of GT Solar International, Inc.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Richard K. Landers

  
	
   

  	
  Richard K. Landers
**EXHIBIT 31.1**I, James C. Day, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Noble Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:March 13, 2006/s/ JAMES C. DAY
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2394 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2394

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Spirodiclofen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2005

  Mr. Costa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Spirodiclofen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPIRODICLOFEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.01      2,2-                Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Dimethylbutanoic                                                   31/2008
                         acid, 3-(2,4-
                         dichlorophenyl)-2-
                         oxo-1-
                         oxaspiro(4.5)dec-
                         3-en-4-yl ester
                         (Spirodiclofen)
                         (CAS No. 148477-
                         71-8) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2932.29.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```