alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
 

 
  
 ZQ
5349 Learning Tree International 
 COMMON STOCK 
 Incorporated Under The Laws of The State of Delaware 
 85,000,000 Authorized Shares $.0001 Par Value 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
 Is The Record Holder of 
 CUSIP
522015 10 6 
 SEE REVERSE 
 FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF $.0001 PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK OF 
 LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL,
INC. 
 transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the seal of the Corporation. 
 Dated: 
 5349 
 LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 CORPORATE SEAL 
 DELAWARE 
 Chief Administrative Officer/Secretary
Chairman/CEO 
 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
 Computershare Trust Company, Inc. 
 P.O. Box 1596 
 Denver, Colorado 80201 

By 
 Transfer Agent & Registrar Authorized Signature 







 

 
  
 LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 TRANSFER FEE: $25.00 PER NEW CERTIFICATE
ISSUED 
 The following abbreviations when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN COM -as
tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- Custodian 
 TEN ENT -as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor)

 JT TEN -as joint tenants with right of Under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
 survivorship and not as tenants Act (State) 
 in common 
 Additional abbreviations may also be
used though not in the above list. 
 For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
 Shares 
 of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
 attorney-in-fact 
 to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named
Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated 
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN
EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. 
 Signature(s) Guaranteed:

 The signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and
Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved signature guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 17Ad-15.
# C_2019255EN.01002701.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/27

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 27 May 2019 — The Software Incubator Ltd v Computer Associates (UK) Ltd

(Case C-410/19)

(2019/C 255/36)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: The Software Incubator Ltd

Defendant: Computer Associates (UK) Ltd

Questions referred

| 1. | Where a copy of computer software is supplied to a principal’s customers electronically, and not on any tangible medium, does it constitute ‘goods’ within the meaning of that term as it appears in the definition of a commercial agent in Article 1(2) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of December 1986 on the co-ordination of the laws of member states relating to self-employed commercial agents (1) (‘Directive’)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where a copy of computer software is supplied to a principal’s customers electronically, and not on any tangible medium, does it constitute ‘goods’ within the meaning of that term as it appears in the definition of a commercial agent in Article 1(2) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of December 1986 on the co-ordination of the laws of member states relating to self-employed commercial agents (1) (‘Directive’)?

| 2. | Where computer software is supplied to a principal’s customers by way of the grant to the customer of a perpetual licence to use a copy of the computer software, does that constitute a ‘sale of goods’ within the meaning of that term as it appears in the definition of commercial agent in Article 1(2) of the Directive? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Where computer software is supplied to a principal’s customers by way of the grant to the customer of a perpetual licence to use a copy of the computer software, does that constitute a ‘sale of goods’ within the meaning of that term as it appears in the definition of commercial agent in Article 1(2) of the Directive?

---

(1)  OJ 1986, L 382, p. 17

---
#### In the Matter of Chung Li, Also Known as Kwong Chung Lee and Another, Deceased. Chun Ka Luk, as Administrator of the Estate of Nancy Lee Luk, Deceased, Appellant; Donald Edward Osborn et al., Respondents.

[942 NYS2d 887]—

In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2103, inter alia, to discover property allegedly withheld from the estate of Chung Li, also known as Kwong Chung Lee, also known as Chung Lee, Chun Ka Luk, as Administrator of the Estate of Nancy Lee Luk, appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Kelly, J.), dated June 8, 2011, which denied Nancy Lee Luk’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the petition as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner, Donald Edward Osborn, as ancillary administrator of the Estate of Chung Li, also known as Kwong Chung Lee, also known as Chung Lee (hereinafter the decedent), commenced this proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2103 against the respondent Nancy Lee Luk, the decedent’s daughter, for discovery and delivery of certain property allegedly belonging to the decedent’s estate. Specifically, the petitioner alleged that Luk converted the decedent’s stock interests in three family businesses.

On a motion to dismiss a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) on the ground that it is barred by the statute of limitations, the movant bears the initial burden of establishing, prima facie, that the time in which to sue has expired *(see Island ADC, Inc. v Baldassano Architectural Croup, P.C.,*49 AD3d 815, 816 [2008]). With respect to a discovery proceeding pursuant to SCPA article 21, “[c]ourts have likened such a proceeding to an action for conversion or replevin and applied a three-year Statute of Limitations” *(Matter of King,*305 AD2d 683, 683 [2003] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see*CPLR 214 [3]). “[A]c*882crual runs from the date the conversion takes place and not from discovery or the exercise of diligence to discover” *(Vigilant Ins. Co. of Am. v Housing Auth. of City of El Paso, Tex.,*87 NY2d *36,*44 *[1995]*[citation omitted]; *see Matter of Rausman, 50*AD3d 909, 910 [2008]).

Here, Luk failed to meet her prima facie burden of demonstrating that the statute of limitations on the petitioner’s conversion claim had run. The evidence submitted by Luk in support of her motion did not establish that the purported conversion of the decedent’s ownership interest in the companies occurred more than three years prior to the commencement of this proceeding. Accordingly, the Surrogate’s Court properly denied Luk’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the petition as time-barred. Florio, J.P., Balkin, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 32 Misc 3d 1225(A), 2011 NY Slip Op 51422(11).]
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Bee Research Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Disease Diagnosis Service
                    Varroacide Registration
                        Varroacide Registration
                                    Oxalic Acid FAQ'sSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Bee Research Laboratory Docs







Businessheadline bar **The Beltsville Bee Research Laboratory coordinates and works closely with other research groups and organizations and interacts with their many customer/stakeholder groups...** USDA ARS Bee Laboratory Web Sites Bee Research Laboratory, Beltsville, MD Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, Tucson, AZ Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics & Physiology Laboratory, Baton Rouge, LA Beneficial Insects Research Unit, Weslaco, TX Bee Biology and Systematics Laboratory, Logan, UT Other Web Sites American Beekeeping Federation American Honey Producers Association Apiary Inspectors of America Beekeeping Information International Bee Research Association Maryland State Beekeeper's Association Mid-Atlantic Apiculture National Honey Board Swiss Bee Research Centre


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2020061EN.01001901.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 27 November 2019 — SC v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych I Oddział w Warszawie Wydział Realizacji Umów Międzynarodowych

(Case C-866/19)

(2020/C 61/23)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC

Defendant: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych I Oddział w Warszawie Wydział Realizacji Umów Międzynarodowych

Question referred

Should Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 883/[20]04 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (1) be interpreted as meaning that the competent institution:

| (a) | takes into account, in accordance with national law, non-contribution periods not exceeding one third of the aggregated contribution periods completed under national law and under the legislations of the other Member States both for the purpose of determining the theoretical amount (point (i)) and the actual amount (point (ii)) of the benefit; or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

takes into account, in accordance with national law, non-contribution periods not exceeding one third of the aggregated contribution periods completed under national law and under the legislations of the other Member States both for the purpose of determining the theoretical amount (point (i)) and the actual amount (point (ii)) of the benefit; or

| (b) | takes into account, in accordance with national law, non-contribution periods not exceeding one third of the aggregated contribution periods completed under national law and under the legislations of the other Member States only for the purpose of determining the theoretical amount (point (i)) but not for the purpose of establishing the actual amount (point (ii)) of the benefit; or |
| --- | --- |

(b)

takes into account, in accordance with national law, non-contribution periods not exceeding one third of the aggregated contribution periods completed under national law and under the legislations of the other Member States only for the purpose of determining the theoretical amount (point (i)) but not for the purpose of establishing the actual amount (point (ii)) of the benefit; or

| (c) | does not take into account, either for the purpose of determining the theoretical amount (point (i)) or the actual amount (point (ii)) of the benefit, periods of insurance in another Member State when calculating the limit on non-contribution periods under national law? |
| --- | --- |

(c)

does not take into account, either for the purpose of determining the theoretical amount (point (i)) or the actual amount (point (ii)) of the benefit, periods of insurance in another Member State when calculating the limit on non-contribution periods under national law?

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1.

---
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form F-3 No. 333-134265, Form F-3 No. 333-111615, Form S-8 No. 333-102860, Form S-8 No. 333-104062 and Form S-8 No. 333-134306) of Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited of our report dated April 12, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors Accountants S.A. 

Athens, Greece 

May 11, 2007
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 8 

To strengthen America’s national security. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. BENNET, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, Mr. COONS, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. BEGICH, 

and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To strengthen America’s national security. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tough and Smart Na5 tional Security Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE. 

7 It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should— 

8 (1) ensure that members of the Armed Forces, 

9 particularly those serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, 

10 and veterans get the support they need and deserve; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 8 IS

1 (2) work with the President to attack al Qaeda 

2 and other terrorist groups with a comprehensive 

3 military, intelligence, homeland security, law enforce4 ment, and diplomatic strategy; 

5 (3) confront the nuclear threat from Iran and 

6 North Korea; 

7 (4) enhance the tools of the United States Gov8 ernment for pursuing key national security interests, 

9 including fighting terrorism, preventing failed states, 

10 thwarting global pandemics, promoting democracy 

11 and development, securing nuclear materials and 

12 preventing nuclear proliferation, and combating 

13 narco-trafficking and drug-related violence around 

14 the world, including along our border with Mexico; 

15 and 

16 (5) reform cybersecurity policy to prevent cyber 

17 attacks on the United States Government and crit18 ical infrastructure, protect privacy and civil liberties, 

19 and implement mechanisms necessary to avert and 

20 respond to catastrophic cyber incidents. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
| 1.       | The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended April 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.       | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|          | /s/ Henry P. Herms                                        |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | Henry P. Herms                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|          | Vice President - Finance and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| June 14, 2010 | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

     I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Brunswick Corporation Note-Backed Series 2002-3 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
            servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
            respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
            report of the Trust;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
            provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
            under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion
            in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
            based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
            Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 28, 2005


      /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
-----------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
# Amtsblatt C 188/2022

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 188 |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 65. Jahrgang10. Mai 2022 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 188

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

65. Jahrgang10. Mai 2022

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | Berichtigungen |
| | Berichtigung der Zusammenfassung von Beschlüssen der Europäischen Kommission über Zulassungen für das Inverkehrbringen zur Verwendung und/oder für eine Verwendung von Stoffen, die in Anhang XIV der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Registrierung, Bewertung, Zulassung und Beschränkung chemischer Stoffe (REACH) aufgeführt sind (Veröffentlicht gemäß Artikel 64 Absatz 9 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006) (2022/C 131/05) ( ABl. C 131 vom 24.3.2022 ) | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

Berichtigungen

Berichtigung der Zusammenfassung von Beschlüssen der Europäischen Kommission über Zulassungen für das Inverkehrbringen zur Verwendung und/oder für eine Verwendung von Stoffen, die in Anhang XIV der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Registrierung, Bewertung, Zulassung und Beschränkung chemischer Stoffe (REACH) aufgeführt sind (Veröffentlicht gemäß Artikel 64 Absatz 9 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006) (2022/C 131/05) ( ABl. C 131 vom 24.3.2022 )

( ABl. C 131 vom 24.3.2022 )

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

Berichtigungen

| 10.5.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 188/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 188/1

---

Berichtigung der Zusammenfassung von Beschlüssen der Europäischen Kommission über Zulassungen für das Inverkehrbringen zur Verwendung und/oder für eine Verwendung von Stoffen, die in Anhang XIV der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Registrierung, Bewertung, Zulassung und Beschränkung chemischer Stoffe (REACH) aufgeführt sind (Veröffentlicht gemäß Artikel 64 Absatz 9 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006) (2022/C 131/05)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 131 vom 24. März 2022
  )

(2022/C 188/01)

Auf Seite 5 Spalte 2 der Tabelle:

Anstatt:

„27. März 2022“

muss es heißen:

„17. März 2022“.

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40774 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
EDGAR ANDRES CANTU

- GARCIA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 89

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Andres Cantu

- Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cantu

- Garcia h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 17, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40774 Document: 00513385221 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016No. 15

- 40774

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40774 Document: 00513385221 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016