alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
YEAR-TO-DATE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOUND ON PAGES 3,4,5 RESPECTIVELY, ON THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE CURRENT PERIOD ENDED AND THE PREVIOUS PERIOD ENDED,
ARE LISTED BELOW IN TABULAR FORMAT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                              <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-29-1997      JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                           37,340           32,523
<SECURITIES>                     42,032           43,960
<RECEIVABLES>                    45,144           53,704
<ALLOWANCES>                     919              961
<INVENTORY>                      56,016           56,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 147,935          155,698
<PP&E>                           156,194          163,604
<DEPRECIATION>                   86,021           89,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   262,899          273,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            52,178           53,897
<BONDS>                          0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0                0
<PREFERRED>                      0                0
<COMMON>                         250              252
<OTHER-SE>                       204,662          214,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     262,899          273,150
<SALES>                          54,772           117,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 54,772           117,277
<CGS>                            27,400           58,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    27,400           58,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 7,270            15,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 20               19
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               102              215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  9,388            20,456
<INCOME-TAX>                     2,816            6,137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              6,572            14,319
<DISCONTINUED>                   0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0                0
<CHANGES>                        0                0
<NET-INCOME>                     6,572            14,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0.26             0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.26             0.57
        

</TABLE>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 794 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow any deduction 

for punitive damages, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 12, 2011 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow 

any deduction for punitive damages, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting American 

5 Taxpayers from Misconduct Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR PUNITIVE 

7 DAMAGES. 

8 (a) DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 162(g) of the Inter10 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 794 IS

1 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and 

2 (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘If’’ and inserting: 

4 ‘‘(1) TREBLE DAMAGES.—If’’, and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(2) PUNITIVE DAMAGES.—No deduction shall 

8 be allowed under this chapter for any amount paid 

9 or incurred for punitive damages in connection with 

10 any judgment in, or settlement of, any action. This 

11 paragraph shall not apply to punitive damages de12 scribed in section 104(c).’’. 

13 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading 

14 for section 162(g) of such Code is amended by in15 serting ‘‘OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES’’ after ‘‘LAWS’’. 

16 (b) INCLUSION IN INCOME OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES

17 PAID BY INSURER OR OTHERWISE.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—Part II of subchapter B of 

19 chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

20 amended by adding at the end the following new sec21 tion: 

22 ‘‘SEC. 91. PUNITIVE DAMAGES COMPENSATED BY INSUR23 ANCE OR OTHERWISE. 

24 ‘‘Gross income shall include any amount paid to or 

25 on behalf of a taxpayer as insurance or otherwise by reaVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:31 Apr 13, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S794.IS S794

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 794 IS

1 son of the taxpayer’s liability (or agreement) to pay puni2 tive damages.’’. 

3 (2) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Section 6041 

4 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(h) SECTION TO APPLY TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES

7 COMPENSATION.—This section shall apply to payments by 

8 a person to or on behalf of another person as insurance 

9 or otherwise by reason of the other person’s liability (or 

10 agreement) to pay punitive damages.’’. 

11 (3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of 

12 sections for part II of subchapter B of chapter 1 of 

13 such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol14 lowing new item: 

‘‘Sec. 91. Punitive damages compensated by insurance or otherwise.’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to damages paid or incurred on 

17 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 846 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 846

   To designate the United States courthouse located at 80 Lafayette 
 Street in Jefferson City, Missouri, as the Christopher S. Bond United 
                           States Courthouse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 2011

  Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mrs. McCaskill) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the United States courthouse located at 80 Lafayette 
 Street in Jefferson City, Missouri, as the Christopher S. Bond United 
                           States Courthouse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHRISTOPHER S. BOND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse located at 80 
Lafayette Street in Jefferson City, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Christopher S. Bond United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Christopher S. Bond United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
ex10a.htm


    


    


    Exhibit
10(a)

    


    


    


    Consent of Ernst
& Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    


    


    We consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No.
333-63505) pertaining
to Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by
reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 31. We also consent to the use of our
reports dated (a) March 18, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b)
March 13, 2009, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln
National Variable Annuity Account H, in Post-Effective Amendment
No. 26, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment
No. 31.

    


                                         /s/ Ernst & Young
LLP

     

    Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania

    December 2,
2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1084

RENEE R. BERRY, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce, 

 Defendant – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:08-cv-00459-JCC-TRJ) 

Submitted: July 27, 2009 Decided: August 17, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Renee R. Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Renee R. Berry appeals the district court’s order 

granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss and dismissing her 

civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Berry v. Locke, No. 1:08-cv-00459-JCCTRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
  report of Argentex Mining Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB
  for the period ending January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chris Dyakowski,
  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
        and                          
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
        of the Company.
|   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Argentex Mining Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

|Date: May 13, 2005 | By: /s/ CHRIS DYAKOWSKI
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   | Chris Dyakowski        
|                   | Chief Financial Officer

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 124 (Thursday, July 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16876 and #16877; Texas Disaster Number TX-
00591]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Texas

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-4586-DR), dated 02/19/2021.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms.
    Incident Period: 02/11/2021 through 02/21/2021.

DATES: Issued on 06/24/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: Filing Period for counties 
listed below ends on 08/23/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: Filing 
Period for counties listed below ends on 03/24/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Texas, dated 2/19/2021, is hereby amended 
to include the counties listed below. Please contact the SBA disaster 
assistance customer service center by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#482c213b293b3c2d3a2b3d3b3c27252d3a3b2d3a3e212b2d083b2a29662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="096d607a687a7d6c7b6a7c7a7d66646c7b7a6c7b7f606a6c497a6b68276e667f">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 to 
request an application. Applications for physical damages may be filed 
until 08/23/2021 and applications for economic injury may be file until 
03/24/2022.

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Kerr, 
Lamar, Shackelford.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Oklahoma: Choctaw.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-14038 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2020027EN.01001001.xml

| 27.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/10

---

Appeal brought on 28 March 2019 by WB against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 23 January 2019 in Case T-329/18 WB v Commission

(Case C-271/19 P)

(2020/C 27/12)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Appellant: WB (represented by: N. Ciocea, avocată)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 3 December 2019, the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded.

---
Exhibit 10.1







Exhibit 10.1




VIA FEDEX ENVELOPE




September 29, 2009




   




Ms. Susan E. Partridge

Contracting Officer

United States Postal Service

475 L’Enfant Plaza S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20260-6210





			
	RE:	 	Transportation Agreement dated July 31, 2006 (the “Transportation Agreement”) between the
United States Postal Service (the “USPS”) and Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”)

Change in Conversion Factor





Dear Ms. Partridge:




As provided in the previously amended Paragraph A.1.a. of Exhibit B to the Transportation
Agreement, the USPS and FedEx agree that the Conversion Factor is [ * ] effective on the September
Schedule Period that begins on September 1, 2009.




By signing this letter, the USPS and FedEx agree to this amendment of the Transportation Agreement.
All capitalized terms have the meanings set out in the Transportation Agreement.




Please sign both counterparts of this letter, retain one for the USPS’ records, and return the
other fully executed counterpart to:



Myla Williams

Legal Department

Federal Express Corporation

3620 Hacks Cross Road

Building B, 3rd Floor

Memphis, Tennessee 38125

(901) 434-8362




			
	*	 	Blank spaces contained confidential information which has been filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.




 


 









 








Federal Express Corporation

Letter Agreement

September 29, 2009




If you should have any questions, please call Myla Williams at (901) 434-8362 or Ron Stevens
at (901) 434-8954 or. Thank you.




Sincerely,




FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION




/S/ PAUL J. HERRON




Paul J. Herron

Vice President

Postal Transportation Management




AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED this 29th day of September, 2009.




THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:


	 	/s/ SUSAN E. PARTRIDGE
 


	 	 
	 
	Its:
	 	Contractor Officer	 	 
	 

	 	The “USPS”	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	cc:

	 	Melissa Mortimer	 	 
	 

	 	Donna Jewett
# C_2019187EN.01005201.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/52

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 1 April 2019 — VQ v Land Hesse

(Case C-272/19)

(2019/C 187/56)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VQ

Defendant: Land Hesse

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (1) — in particular Article 15 on ‘Right of access by the data subject’ thereof — applicable to the committee of a parliament of a constituent state of a Member State that is responsible for processing the petitions of citizens — namely the Petitions Committee of the Hesse Land Parliament — and is that committee to be regarded in that connection as a public authority within the meaning of Article 4(7) of the Regulation No 2016/679? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (1) — in particular Article 15 on ‘Right of access by the data subject’ thereof — applicable to the committee of a parliament of a constituent state of a Member State that is responsible for processing the petitions of citizens — namely the Petitions Committee of the Hesse Land Parliament — and is that committee to be regarded in that connection as a public authority within the meaning of Article 4(7) of the Regulation No 2016/679?

| 2. | Is the referring court an independent and impartial tribunal within the meaning of Article 267 TFEU read in conjunction with Article 47(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the referring court an independent and impartial tribunal within the meaning of Article 267 TFEU read in conjunction with Article 47(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?

---

(1)  OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1.

---
#### LENCCO RACING CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James JOLLIFFE, Defendant, and Micro Belmont Engineering, Defendant-Appellee, and Arctco, Inc. (now known as Arctic Cat, Inc.), Defendant-Appellee, and Black Magic Motor Sports, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 2008-1235 to 2008-1237.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 8, 2009.

Carl A. Hjort, III, The Bilicki Law Firm, P.C., of Jamestown, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Byron A. Bilicki.

Terence J. Linn, Van Dyke, Gardner, Linn & Burkhart, LLP, of Grand Rapids, MI, argued for defendants-appellees Micro Belmont Engineering and Black Magic Motor Sports, Inc. With him on the brief were Karl T. Ondersma, and Stephen B. Salai, Harter Secrest & Emery LLP, of Rochester, NY, for defendant-appellee Black Magic Motor Sports, Inc.

Lawrence D. Graham, Black Lowe *&*Graham, PLLC, of Seattle, WA, argued for defendant-appellee Arctco, Inc. With him on the brief was Douglas A. Grady.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dover Petroleum Corp. (the "Company") on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
Salna,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


            April 13, 2004

                          /s/ Robert Salna
                          -----------------------------------------------
                          By: Robert Salna
                          Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DOVER PETROLEUM,  INC. AND WILL BE
RETAINED  BY DOVER  PETROLEUM  AND  FURNISHED  TO THE  SECURITIES  AND  EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the amendment no. 1 to the annual report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A or the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Wilkinson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and operating results of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Jeffrey A. Wilkinson                         
|Jeffrey A. Wilkinson                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|October 11, 2005