alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Joseph R. Turner, Jr., an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

July 11, 1985

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Michael A. Gentile*for petitioner.

No appearance on behalf of respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice law on March 14, 1979, in the Second Judicial Department. On March 6, 1985, he entered a plea of guilty in Supreme Court, Bronx County, to grand larceny in the second degree, a class D felony. (Penal Law § 155.35.) A certified copy of the disposition of this proceeding has been presented to this court. (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [b].) Disbarment becomes automatic upon the entry of a plea of guilty to a felony. (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]; CPL 1.20 [13]; *Matter of Cohen,*107 AD2d 189 [1st Dept 1985]; *Matter of Swirsky,*103 AD2d 195 [1st Dept 1984].)

Accordingly, the petition should be granted and respondent’s name ordered stricken from the roll of attorneys in the State of New York, forthwith.

Murphy, P. J., Fein, Milonas, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York.
Exhibit 99



Certification Accompanying Periodic Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Bi-Optic Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"), I, Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Harry Chew_____________________________

Harry Chew

Chief Executive Officer

May 27, 2003
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Minera Andes Inc. (the
Corporation), on Form 10-QSB for the six month period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bonnie L. Kuhn, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                 |  | MINERA ANDES INC.
|----- |  | --------------- |  | -----------------
|      |  |                 |  |                  
|Date: |  | August 11, 2003 |  |                  
|      |  |                 |  |                  
|      |  |                 |  |
# C_2020201EN.01000201.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/2

---

Appeal brought on 22 July 2019 by Hochmann Marketing GmbH against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 22 May 2019 in Case T-754/18, Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Parliament

(Case C-557/19 P)

(2020/C 201/02)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Hochmann Marketing GmbH (represented by: J Jennings, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

By order of 30 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 838 

To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to clarify the jurisdiction of 

the Environmental Protection Agency with respect to certain sporting 

good articles, and to exempt those articles from a definition under that 

Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2011 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. THUNE, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. 

BEGICH, and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to clarify the 

jurisdiction of the Environmental Protection Agency with 

respect to certain sporting good articles, and to exempt 

those articles from a definition under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hunting, Fishing, and 

5 Recreational Shooting Protection Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 838 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION. 

2 Section 3(2)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act 

3 (15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)) is amended— 

4 (1) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘, and’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘, or any component of any such article includ6 ing, without limitation, shot, bullets and other pro7 jectiles, propellants, and primers,’’; 

8 (2) in clause (vi) by striking the period at the 

9 end and inserting ‘‘, and’’; and 

10 (3) by inserting after clause (vi) the following: 

11 ‘‘(vii) any sport fishing equipment (as such 

12 term is defined in subparagraph (a) of section 4162 

13 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) the sale of 

14 which is subject to the tax imposed by section 

15 4161(a) of such Code (determined without regard to 

16 any exemptions from such tax as provided by section 

17 4162 or 4221 or any other provision of such Code), 

18 and sport fishing equipment components.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.2 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We have issued our report dated January 30, 2004, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Texas UnitedBancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We do hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-8, FileNos. 333-100162 and 333-100163. 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

March 28, 2005
Exhibit 13a





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of LiveReel Media
Corporation. for the year ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and





2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the registrant.








Date:  November 22, 2016








/s/ Ashish
Kapoor


Ashish Kapoor


Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by
the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of LiveReel Media
Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and





2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the registrant.








Date:  November 22, 2016








/s/ J. Graham
Simmonds


J. Graham Simmons


Chief Executive Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by
the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Vitor PUKRI aka Viktor Pukri, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-2459-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 3, 2011.

Saul C. Brown, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Tony West, Assistant Attorney, General; Lyle D. Jentzer, Senior, Litigation Counsel; Glen T. Jaeger, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., SUSAN L. CARNEY, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Petitioner Vitor Pukri, a native and citizen of Albania, seeks review of a May 24, *6062010, decision of the BIA denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. *In re Pukri,*No. [ AXXX XXX XXX ] (B.I.A. May 24, 2010). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the ease.

We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. *See Ali v. Gonzales,*448 F.3d 515, 517 (2d Cir.2006). In denying Pukri’s motion, the BIA cited his failure to submit an asylum application with his motion as required under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). Pukri fails to challenge this ruling, which is dispositive. *See LNC Invs., Inc. v. Nat’l Westminster Bank, N.J.,*308 F.3d 169, 176 n. 8 (2d Cir.2002) (“While we no doubt have the power to address an argument despite its abandonment on appeal, we ordinarily will not do so ‘unless manifest injustice otherwise would result.’ ” (quoting *Anderson v. Branen,*27 F.3d 29, 30 (2d Cir.1994))).

Moreover, “[a] motion to reopen proceedings for the purpose of submitting an application for relief must be accompanied by the appropriate application for relief and all supporting documentation.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1). The BIA’s position is that failure to comply with the requirement is a ground for denial of the motion. Since the plain language of the regulation supports that position, we defer to it. *See Zhen Nan Lin v. Dep’t of Justice,*459 F.3d 255, 262 (2d Cir.2006). Other circuit courts have reached the same conclusion in published opinions. *See Lin Xing Jiang v. Holder,*639 F.3d 751, 757 (7th Cir.2011); *Romero-Ruiz v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 1057, 1064 (9th Cir.2008); *Waggoner v. Gonzales,*488 F.3d 632, 638-39 (5th Cir.2007); *Palma-Mazariegos v. Keisler,*504 F.3d 144, 147 (1st Cir.2007).

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. As we have completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DISMISSED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34.1(b).
#### LYMAN v. DWYER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 15, 1898.)

Action by Henry H. Lyman, as excise commissioner, against John E. Dwyer and 40 others.

No opinion. Defendants’ motion for judgment, etc., denied, and plaintiff’s motion for stay granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                 CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT RELATING TO THE
                 ANNUAL REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     I, Leonard A. Cullo, Jr., Director and President of H.J. Heinz Finance
Company, a Delaware corporation ("Heinz Finance"), hereby certify that, to my
knowledge:

     1. Heinz Finance's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended April
        30, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        Heinz Finance.

Date: July 24, 2003

                                          By: /s/ LEONARD A. CULLO, JR.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Leonard A. Cullo, Jr.
                                            Title:  Director and President
**CERTIFICATION
      OF OFFICERS**


**OF
      ARTFEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 USC & 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY**


**ACT
      OF 2002**





I
      hereby
      certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-KSB, and filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Report”) by Artfest International,
      Inc. fully complies with the requirements of that section.





I
      further
      certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      company.





February
      6, 2006





/s/
      Joseph Walsh


Joseph
      Walsh, President,


Chief
      Executive Officer





/s/
      Joseph Walsh


Joseph
      Walsh,


Treasurer
      (Chief Financial Officer)





_________________________________________
Opinion issued November 1, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 4
- 00 6 4 7
- CV

——————————— KAREN KRISTINE SILVIO , Appellant

V. JASON B. OSTROM AND NICOLE K. SAIN , Appellee s

O n Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 937,16 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Karen Kristine Silvio, proceeding pro se, timely appealed from the trial court’s final judgment, signed on May 9, 2014, after moving for a new trial. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1( a )(1) . However, appellant ha s neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the filing fee or the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and s he2

ha s not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5,
20.1 , 37.3(b)

. After being notified by th is C ourt’s Order and Notice of Intent to
Dismiss for Want of Prosecution on August 15 , 2016, which reinstated this case after appellant’s bankruptcy case had been dismissed, that this appeal was subject to
dismissal for want of prosecution for failure to pay the required fee s , appellant did not timely respond. 1 See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3( b ) , (c)

. Accordingly, w e dismiss th is appeal for nonpayment of all required fee s and for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss

a ny pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Huddle

.

1 Although appellant filed a motion to establish indigence in this Court on September 8, 2016, appellant failed to ti mely respond after this Court ordered her to use the new form required by the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1( c ).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 28, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 28, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0074. TRACY LLEWELLYN v. JASON BRYANT et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16STCV055
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant tothe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a partof the Quarterly Report of UTStarcom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”).

In connection with the Report, we, Hong Liang Lu andFrancis P. Barton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (i)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as  amended; and               |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (ii)   |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 

Dated: October 17, 2007
| By:    |   | /s/ HONG LIANG  LU                                           |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Name: Hong Liang Lu                                          |   |   |
|   |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer                               |   |   |
|   |   |                                                         |   |   |
| By:    |   | /s/ FRANCIS P.  BARTON                                       |   |   |   |
|   |   | Name: Francis P. Barton                                      |   |   |
|   |   |                                                         |   |   |
|   |   | Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |   |   |

 

----
#### CITY OF ROME, Respondent, v. DUNHAM et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by the city of Rome against John E. Dunham and George E. Dunham.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.
# C_2019348EN.01000602.xml

| 14.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 16 July 2019 — WV v Landkreis Harburg

(Case C-540/19)

(2019/C 348/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant and appellant: WV

Applicant and respondent: Landkreis Harburg

Question referred

Can a public body which has provided a maintenance creditor with social assistance benefits in accordance with provisions of public law invoke the place of jurisdiction at the place of habitual residence of the maintenance creditor under Article 3(b) of the European Maintenance Regulation (1) in the case where it asserts the maintenance creditor’s maintenance claim under civil law, transferred to it on the basis of the granting of social assistance by way of statutory subrogation, against the maintenance debtor by way of recourse?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations (OJ 2009 L 7, p. 1).

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Jerry M. Keepers, M.D., Eric Kay

- Fung Chan, M.D., and Vista Community Medical Center, LLP d/b/a Surgery Specialty Hospitals of

America v. Michael Smith and Valerie Smith

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 0

- 0 0 4 63

- C V

Trial court case number: 20 1 9

- 47101

Trial court: 295 th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed : August 5 , 2022

Party filing motion : Appe llant

The en banc court has unanimously voted to deny the motion for en banc reconsideration filed by appellant, Vista Community Medical Center, LLP, doing business as Surgery Specialty Hospitals of America . It is ordered that the motion is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Julie Countiss

_______ Acting for the En Banc Court *

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy, Guerra, and Farris

.

Date:



### __ August 23, 2022

_____
#### MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO., Respondent, v. RAYMOND et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 25, 1907.)

Action by the Mutual Life Insurance Company against Charles H. Raymond and another. D. BlcOlure, for appellant. J. BlcICeen, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We have  issued  our  reports  dated  March  17,  2005,  accompanying  the
consolidated   financial   statements   and   management's   assessment  of  the
effectiveness  of internal control in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oak Hill
Financial,  Inc. for the year ended  December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Oak
Hill Financial,  Inc. on Forms S-8, File Nos. 333-116863,  333-45690,  333-81167
and 333-27481.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 24, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                       76
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANDRES PARRA
, Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 871

[ March 26, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; David A. Haimes , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

- 16

- 011363 (08)

.

Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Kara Rockenbach Link and Daniel M

. Schwarz of Link & Rockenbach, PA, West Palm Beach, and Michael Balducci and William A. Sabinson of Kubicki Draper, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, D AMOORGIAN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.