alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 990 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.990

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 
2011''.
SEC. 2. SUNSET EXTENSIONS.
    (a) USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005.--
Section 102(b)(1) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization 
Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-177; 50 U.S.C. 1805 note, 50 U.S.C. 1861 
note, and 50 U.S.C. 1862 note) is amended by striking ``May 27, 2011'' 
and inserting ``June 1, 2015''.
    (b) Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.--
Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 
Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended by 
striking ``May 27, 2011'' and inserting ``June 1, 2015''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### SUTPHIN, AppeUant, v. MacMULKIN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

April 12, 1912.)

Action by William L. Sutphin against John J. MacMulkin. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6235** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. YVETTE GAINES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distr ict of Virginia , at Alexandria
. T. S. Ellis III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:07

- cr - 00070

- TSE

- 3; 1:09

- cv - 01238

- TSE )

Submitted : August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.

D ismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Yvette Gaines, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Marie Velandy, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Yv ette Gaines seeks to appeal the district court’s order d ismissing her 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion as untimely and the court’s order denying a certificate of appealability . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge iss ues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relie f on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a con stitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gaines has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argum ent because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
# C_2021098EN.01002401.xml

| 22.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Ruhorimbere v Council

(Case T-121/19) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures - Right to private and family life - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality - Plea of illegality)

(2021/C 98/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Éric Ruhorimbere (Mbuji-Mayi, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, H. Marcos Fraile, S. Van Overmeire and M.-C. Cadilhac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1940 of 10 December 2018 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2018 L 134, p. 47) and, second, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1931 of 10 December 2018 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2018 L 314, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Éric Ruhorimbere to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Éric Ruhorimbere to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.

---
# C_2020378EN.01003102.xml

| 9.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Daw v EUIPO (SOS Innenfarbe)

(Case T-625/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark SOS Innenfarbe - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2020/C 378/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Daw SE (Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2019 (Case R 277/2019-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign SOS Innenfarbe as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Daw SE is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Daw SE is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-13981 and No. 333-62123) on Form S-8 of Patriot Bank Corp. of our report
dated January 19 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Patriot
Bank Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2000,
which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of
Patriot Bank Corp.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 21, 2000
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Food Surveys Research Group: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC) Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center Food Surveys Research Group Docs





- FSRG Home Page
- FSRG Main Menu
- WWEIA
- Dietary Methods Research
- What's In the Foods You Eat Search Tool
- FNDDS
- AMPM
- FPED
- FICRCD
- FSRG Listserv
- Food Surveys 1935-1998

As a subscriber, you will receive e-mail announcements when: data are released from What We Eat In America, the dietary interview component of NHANES
new releases of the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies are issued
new FSRG products appear, such as reports and research articles
FSRG conducts activities, such as presentations at professional meetings and workshops on using dietary survey data **FSRG**
  Click here to subscribe


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
# C_2020161EN.01001401.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Blagoevgrad (Bulgaria) lodged on 13 May 2019 — MAK TURS AD v Direktor na Direktsiya ‘Inspektsiya po truda’ — Blagoevgrad

(Case C-376/19)

(2020/C 161/19)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Rayonen sad — Blagoevgrad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MAK TURS AD

Defendant: Direktor na Direktsiya ‘Inspektsiya po truda’ — Blagoevgrad

By order of 13 February 2020, the Court (Sixth Chamber) declared that the Court of Justice of the European Union lacks jurisdiction to hear the case.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,976
<SECURITIES>                                    18,045
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,206
<PP&E>                                           5,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,438
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            84
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,747
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,009
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                831
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       831
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19<F1>
<FN>
<F1>PRESENTED ON A PRO FORMA BASIS AS IF THE COMPANY HAD BEEN FULLY SUBJECT TO FEDERAL
AND STATE INCOME TAXES FOR ALL PERIODS PRESENTED.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15367]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Accelerating Medicine Partnership 
in Parkinson's Disease (AMP PD).
    Date: July 30, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mirela Milescu, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH, NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 
9529, Rockville, MD 20852, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a0703180f060b440703060f19091f2a040302440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3bebaa1b6bfb2fdbebabfb6a0b0a693bdbabbfdb4bca5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 15, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-15367 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Gregory J. Dawson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kentucky Bancshares,
Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.
Date:   March 28, 2006
BY  /s/ Gregory J. Dawson
Gregory J. Dawson
Chief Financial Officer
95
# C_2021357EN.01001902.xml

| 6.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — BG v Parliament

(Case T-253/19) (1)

(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Termination of the contract - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Retaliation - Manifest errors of assessment - Liability)

(2021/C 357/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BG (represented by: L. Levi, A. Champetier and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: I. Lázaro Betancor and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 18 May 2018 to terminate the applicant’s contract as an accredited parliamentary assistant and, secondly, compensation for the non-material damage which she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders BG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
#### Ronald J. Scott et al., Appellants, v Daniel Murch et al., Respondents.

[944 NYS2d 713]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Yates County (W. Patrick Falvey, A.J.), entered May 4, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Fahey and Sconiers, JJ. [Prior Case History: 31 Misc 3d 1216(A), 2011 NY Slip Op 50694(U).]
# C_2022237EN.01004601.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — FC v EUAA

(Case T-634/19) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Pre-disciplinary proceedings - Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities - OLAF Report - Principle of sound administration - Right to be heard - Principle of impartiality - Manifest error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Liability - Close link with the claim for annulment)

(2022/C 237/57)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: FC (represented by: V. Christianos, A. Skoulikis and M.-C. Vlachoy, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) (represented by: P. Eyckmans and M. Stamatopoulou, acting as Agents, and A. Guillerme and T. Bontinck, lawyers)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) of [confidential] by which that agency suspended her and of the decision of [confidential] by which it rejected her complaint of [confidential] and, second, compensation for the harm she claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders FC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders FC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.

---
# Vt5-/S ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA# 03-13-00371-CR Douglas Farirayi v.The State of 

### STYLE: Texas COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED 

### OFFENSE: DWI 

### COUNTY: Travis TRIAL COURT: 427th District Court DATE: 06/23/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: D-l-DC-11-206200



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS Douglas Farirayi v.TheState of STYLE: Texas 

## PRO SE Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

### DATE: /vlp-?/2DU~ 

# Ml JUDGE: JjU Lsbuu*~— CCA#: 

# %HS-IS CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD