alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         230,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,551,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    470,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,587,731
<PP&E>                                       2,388,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,906,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,878,168
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,985,413
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,990,210)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,906,504
<SALES>                                      2,713,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,713,338
<CGS>                                          937,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,465,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,465,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,465,691)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)


</TABLE>
# C_2019139EN.01003301.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/33

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 24 January 2019 — SONAECOM, SGPS S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-42/19)

(2019/C 139/31)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SONAECOM, SGPS S.A.

Respondent: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it compatible with the deductibility rules laid down in the Sixth VAT Directive, (1) specifically Articles 4(1) and (2) and 17(1), (2) and (5), to deduct tax borne by the appellant, Sonaecom SGPS, in respect of consultancy services connected with a market study commissioned with a view to acquiring shares, where that acquisition did not materialise? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it compatible with the deductibility rules laid down in the Sixth VAT Directive, (1) specifically Articles 4(1) and (2) and 17(1), (2) and (5), to deduct tax borne by the appellant, Sonaecom SGPS, in respect of consultancy services connected with a market study commissioned with a view to acquiring shares, where that acquisition did not materialise?

| 2. | Is it compatible with the deductibility rules laid down in the Sixth VAT Directive, specifically Articles 4(1) and (2) and 17(1), (2) and (5), to deduct tax borne by the appellant, Sonaecom SGPS, in respect of the payment to BCP of a commission for organising and putting together a bond loan, allegedly taken out with a view to integrating the financial structure of its affiliated companies, and which, since those investments failed to materialise, was ultimately transferred to Sonae, SGPS, the parent company of the group? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it compatible with the deductibility rules laid down in the Sixth VAT Directive, specifically Articles 4(1) and (2) and 17(1), (2) and (5), to deduct tax borne by the appellant, Sonaecom SGPS, in respect of the payment to BCP of a commission for organising and putting together a bond loan, allegedly taken out with a view to integrating the financial structure of its affiliated companies, and which, since those investments failed to materialise, was ultimately transferred to Sonae, SGPS, the parent company of the group?

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

---
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 31, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer 61
[No. 9573.

*En Banc.*

July 29, 1912.]

#### R. H. McElroy, *Respondent,*v. G. W. Gates, *Appellants.**1*

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered January 24, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on promissory notes.

Affirmed.

*Higgins, Hall & Halverstadt,*for appellant.

*James W. Reynolds,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 124 Pac. 1127.

On Rehearing.

Pee Cubiam.

Upon a rehearing of this case *en lane,*a majority

of the court have concluded that the residence of the defendant at the time the contract was entered into continues to be his residence for the purposes of the contract, and the fact that he was out of the state when the notes became due and remained out did not change his residence so as to set the statute of Missouri in operation. The right of the plaintiff to bring the action in Missouri was therefore unaffected by the defendant’s absence or residence elsewhere thereafter. We are satisfied that the correct result was reached in the department decision heretofore rendered. *McElroy v. Gates,*64 Wash. 249, 116 Pac. 845.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory KELTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-10749

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 22, 2011.

Ramona C. Albin, Daniel J. Fortune, Mary Anne Gallagher, Joyce White Vance, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gregory J. Reid, Attorney at Law, Gar-dendale, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HULL, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory J. Reid, appointed counsel for Gregory Kelton in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to *632withdraw is GRANTED, and Kelton’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Helvetia Asset Recovery,



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 22, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00569

- CV

Burton KAHN

, Appellant

v.

HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 18355

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion to Consolida te Appeal is DENIED.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2019357EN.01001101.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria regionale della Campania (Italy) lodged on 25 June 2019 — Antonio Capaldo SpA v Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio delle dogane di Salerno

(Case C-496/19)

(2019/C 357/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria regionale della Campania

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: Antonio Capaldo SpA

Defendant and respondent: Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio delle dogane di Salerno

Question referred

Where goods have been physically inspected upon importation, does this preclude initiating the procedure for the review of assessments referred to in Article 78 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (1) establishing the Community Customs Code?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1).

---
# C_2019423EN.01002101.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 11 September 2019 — M, A, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, other parties: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, T

(Case C-673/19)

(2019/C 423/26)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: M, A, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

Defendants: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, T

Question referred

Does Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348), (1) in particular Articles 3, 4, 6 and 15 thereof, preclude a foreign national who enjoys international protection in another EU Member State from being detained under national law, given that the purpose of the detention is removal to that other Member State and, for that reason, an instruction to depart to the territory of that Member State had initially been issued but no return decision was subsequently taken?

---

(1)  P. 98.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection
with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Americare Health Scan, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr.
Joseph P. DAngelo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)
The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.  Date:
November 5, 2008

/s/ Dr.
 Joseph P. DAngeloDr. Joseph
 P. DAngelo, President, Chief
 Executive OfficerNovember 5, 2008

/s/ Robert
 CanoRobert Cano,
 Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 134 (Friday, July 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 37752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15203]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, July 20, 2021.

PLACE: The meeting is open to the public. Out of an abundance of 
caution related to current and potential coronavirus developments, the 
public's means to observe this Board meeting will be via a Webcast live 
on the internet and subsequently made available on-demand approximately 
one week after the event. Visit http://fdic.windrosemedia.com to view 
the live event. Visit http://fdic.windrosemedia.com/index.php?category=FDIC+Board+Meetings after the meeting. If you need 
any technical assistance, please visit our Video Help page at: https://www.fdic.gov/video.html.
    Observers requiring auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language 
interpretation) for this meeting should call 703-562-2404 (Voice) or 
703-649-4354 (Video Phone) to make necessary arrangements.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Pursuant to the provisions of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby 
given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of 
Directors will meet in open session to consider the following matters:

Summary Agenda

    No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. 
These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of 
the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the discussion 
agenda.
    Disposition of Minutes of a Board of Directors' Meeting Previously 
Distributed.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on 
Revisions to Standardized Approach for Calculating the Exposure Amount 
of Derivative Contracts.

Discussion Agenda

    Memorandum and resolution re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
Regarding Simplification of Deposit Insurance Rules for Trust and 
Mortgage Servicing Accounts.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Deputy 
Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on July 13, 2021.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-15203 Filed 7-14-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-084-CV

IN RE JEROME D. BROWN	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because relator has provided no file- marked copy of either motion for which he is demanding a ruling, and the trial court has informed us that it has not received either of these motions.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and WALKER, J.

DELIVERED:  March 27831, 2008March 19, 2008
# C_2021462EN.01005902.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/59

---

Order of the General Court of 27 August 2021 — Essentra and Others v Commission

(Case T-470/19) (1)

(2021/C 462/73)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.1



THANKSGIVING COFFEE COMPANY, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul KatzeffChief Executive OfficerMarch 23, 2005
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       

<S>                                            <C>                   <C>                   
                                                                     RESTATED 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998           MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998            JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998           MAR-31-1997 
<CASH>                                            809                   796 
<SECURITIES>                                   21,747                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,500                 7,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                      165                   150
<INVENTORY>                                         0                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               30,959                 8,994
<PP&E>                                          5,926                 4,287 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,331                 1,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,787                11,938 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,963                 7,357
<BONDS>                                             0                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                     0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                     0
<COMMON>                                           90                    55
<OTHER-SE>                                     31,734                 4,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34,787                11,938
<SALES>                                             0                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,758                10,307 
<CGS>                                               0                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,803                 5,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,519                 3,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (252)                   89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (312)                  968
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (100)                  368
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (212)                  600
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (212)                  600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)                 0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)                 0.09
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1








PACIFIC STATE BANCORP





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Regarding Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2009





In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company














BY: /S/ Rick Simas


Principal Executive Officer


Date: April 15, 2010
ex10a.htm


    


    


    Exhibit
10(a)

    


    


    


    Consent of Ernst
& Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    


    


    We consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No.
333-63505) pertaining
to Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by
reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 32. We also consent to the use of our
reports dated (a) March 18, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b)
March 13, 2009, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln
National Variable Annuity Account H, in Post-Effective Amendment
No. 26, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment
No. 32.

    


                                          /s/ Ernst & Young
LLP

     

    Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania

    December 17,
2009