alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant, Soil and Nutrition Research: Ithaca, NY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health
                                    Emerging Pests and Pathogens ResearchSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Ithaca, New York Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health Plant, Soil and Nutrition Research Docs







Businessheadline bar We have Specific Cooperative Agreements with multiple research partners at Cornell (Crop and Soil Sciences, Plant Biology, Plant Pathology, Horticultural Sciences, Food Sciences, Microbiology), Boyce Thompson Institute, and many American and international universities. Methods for Improving Ruminal Fermentation Ruminal Lysine Degradation Bioavailability and Geographic Distribution of Nutritionally Important Elements in Crops & Soils


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-21-2021]

      ( print page 37116)    
On March 11, 2021, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 99D, in Newark, Delaware.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 14867-14868, March 19, 2021). On July 9, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: July 9, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-14958 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Unassociated Document


     

     

    
      	 	
              Exhibit
      10.2

            


    

     

     

    December
2, 2009

     

    Stuart
Paton

    Technical
and Commercial Director

    Dana
Petroleum

    17 Carden
Place

    Aberdeen,
AB10 1UR, Scotland, UK

     

    Subject: 
Renewal of Offer for Buyer’s Option to Increase Dana’s Participating
Interest

     

    Dear
Stuart:

     

    I am
writing to confirm our offer, consistent with the principles pursuant to our
Letter of Intent, that Dana may acquire an increased participating interest in
the PSC and be the designated operator upon a reasonable time in the event of
the termination of our present letter of intent with Repsol, should that occur
without leading to an executed Sales and Purchase Agreement and our inability to
obtain the participation of another major oil company.

     

    Presently,
we feel that a reasonable period would be ninety days after we have notified
Dana of our receipt of unequivocal notice of Repsol’s termination of its letter
of intent.  This would allow us to bring on a major company with the
financial and technical abilities to assume the Operator’s function as
envisioned in the LOI. As set out in our Letter of Intent, once the ninety-day
period has passed, if we have not secured the participation of such a
company, Dana may, by notifying us in writing within a reasonable time, acquire,
subject to all necessary governmental approvals, up to an additional
twenty-seven percent interest for a maximum total participating interest of
fifty percent on the same terms and conditions, mutatis mutandis, as those
set forth in our sales and purchase agreement other than financial
consideration, which shall be subject to the future mutual agreement of the
parties.  Additionally, if Dana so acquires the full additional
twenty-seven percent then it will be the designated Operator, subject always to
all necessary governmental and third party approvals.  We anticipate
that, as a practical matter, Dana and Hyperdynamics will likely have entered
into a Sales and Purchase Agreement, terminating our Letter of Intent, by the
time such a termination of a Repsol acquisition occurs.  We feel that
seven days should be a reasonable time for Dana to notify us in writing of your
intent to increase your participating interest.

     

    If you
agree to the terms and conditions set forth above, please indicate your
agreement below.

     

    Very
truly yours,

    


    /s/ Ray
Leonard

    Ray
Leonard, President and Chief Executive Officer

    


    AGREED
AND ACCEPTED:

    


    /s/ Stuart
Paton

    Stuart
Paton

     

     

     

    One Sugar Creek Center, Suite
125   s Sugar Land, TX 77478   s   713-353-9400 s 713-353-9421 fax s www.hyperdynamics.com
# C_2019187EN.01004701.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/47

---

Appeal brought on 18 March 2019 by George Haswani against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 16 January 2019 in Case T-477/17 Haswani v Council

(Case C-241/19 P)

(2019/C 187/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: George Haswani (represented by: G. Karouni, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant submits that the Court should:

| — | Set aside the judgment of 16 January 2019, T-477/17, in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment of 16 January 2019, T-477/17, in its entirety;

| — | Order the removal of Mr George Haswani’s name from the annexes to the acts contested before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the removal of Mr George Haswani’s name from the annexes to the acts contested before the General Court;

| — | Dispose of the case and:






  — | Annul Decision 2015/1836 and Regulation 2015/1828; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Dispose of the case and:

—

Annul Decision 2015/1836 and Regulation 2015/1828;

| — | Order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 100 000 in respect of the non-pecuniary harm suffered by Mr Haswani; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 100 000 in respect of the non-pecuniary harm suffered by Mr Haswani;

| — | Order the Council to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the appellant before both the General Court and the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the appellant before both the General Court and the Court of Justice.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The first ground of appeal alleges an error of law, infringement of Decisions 2015/1836 (recital 6) and 2013/255 (recital 5) as amended by Decision 2015/1836, as well as the reversal of the burden of proof and breach of the principle of the presumption of innocence.

The second ground of appeal alleges breach of the obligation to state reasons and failure to state reasons.

The third ground of appeal alleges breach of the principle of proportionality and failure to state reasons.

---
# C_2019372EN.01001401.xml

| 4.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/14 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) lodged on 17 July 2019 — DX v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo (Case C-549/19) (2019/C 372/14) Language of the case: Spanish Referring court Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: DX Defendant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo Question referred Is an interpretation such as that set out in judgments of the Spanish Supreme Court No 191/2019 of 19 February 2019, appeal in cassation 5607/2017 (ECLI:ES:TS:2019:580), and No 257/2019 of 27 February 2019, appeal in cassation 5809/2017 (ECLI:ES:TS:2019:663), according to which, through an interpretation of Directive 2001/40/EC, ( 1 ) it is possible to come to the conclusion that any third-country national holding a long-term residence permit who has committed an offence punishable by a sentence of at least one year in duration can and should be ‘automatically’ removed, that is to say, without needing to give any consideration to his personal, family, social or employment circumstances, compatible with Article 12 of Council [Directive] 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, ( 2 ) and with — inter alia — the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 7 December 2017 (Case C-636/16 ( 3 )) and of 8 December 2011 (Case C-371/08 ( 4 ))? ( 1 )  Council Directive 2001/40/EC of 28 May 2001 on the mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third country nationals (OJ 2001 L 149, p. 34). ( 2 )  OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44. ( 3 )  Judgment of 7 December 2017, López Pastuzano (C-636/16, EU:C:2017:949). ( 4 )  Judgment of 8 December 2011, Ziebell (C-371/08, EU:C:2011:809).

---
#### In the Matter of Commissioner of Social Services, Respondent, v Dimarcus C., Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 339]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about December 1, 2010, which denied appellant’s motion seeking genetic testing; and order of filiation, same court and Judge, also entered on or about December 1, 2010, declaring appellant to be the father of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly determined that it was in the best interests of the child to estop respondent from denying that he is the child’s father *(see Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D.,*7 NY3d 320, 326 [2006]). The testimony established that respondent has held himself out to be the father to his friends, family and coworkers, permits the child to call him “daddy,” brought the child to the funeral of his grandmother, watched the child at his workplace on a regular basis, and provided the mother with money for the child. Moreover, the social worker stated that the 12-year-old child believes that respondent is his father and understands that other men in the mother’s life are not his father.

The court was not required to determine the child’s biological father when it dismissed the petition brought against another man, whom DNA testing established was not the father. Nor was it required to have the other man joined as a necessary *539party to these proceedings since the child was born out of wedlock and a father-son relationship exists between the child and respondent. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

HOUSING OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS REO, LLC

v.

MARIANNE MEHALSHICK AND

MICHAEL A. MEHALSHICK

PETITION OF: MARIANNE MEHALSHICK :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 618 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, Principal Financial Officer of New Jersey
Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: November 11, 2010

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCH 
  Fred W. Brackebusch, Principal Financial Officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 569 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 569

           To provide for fairness for the Federal judiciary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2011

  Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Graham, Mr. 
Reid, Mr. Lee, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Lieberman, and Mr. Kerry) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To provide for fairness for the Federal judiciary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Judicial Fairness Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. JUDICIAL COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES.

    (a) Repeal of Statutory Requirement Relating to Judicial 
Salaries.--Section 140 of the resolution entitled ``A Joint Resolution 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1982, and 
for other purposes.'', approved December 15, 1981 (Public Law 97-92; 95 
Stat. 1200; 28 U.S.C. 461 note), is repealed.
    (b) Automatic Salary Adjustments.--Section 461(a) of title 28, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Effective at the beginning of the first applicable pay period 
commencing on or after the first day of the month in which an 
adjustment takes effect under sections 5303 and 5304 of title 5 in the 
rates of pay under the General Schedule, each salary rate which is 
subject to adjustment under this section shall be adjusted by an 
amount, rounded to the nearest multiple of $100 (or, if midway between 
multiples of $100, to the next higher multiple of $100) equal to the 
percentage of such salary rate which corresponds to the overall average 
percentage of the adjustment in the rates of pay under the General 
Schedule.''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

Calendar No. 111 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 846 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 80 Lafayette Street 

in Jefferson City, Missouri, as the Christopher S. Bond United States 

Courthouse. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2011 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

JULY 22, 2011 

Reported by Mrs. BOXER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 80 

Lafayette Street in Jefferson City, Missouri, as the 

Christopher S. Bond United States Courthouse. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHRISTOPHER S. BOND UNITED STATES 

4 COURTHOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

6 located at 80 Lafayette Street in Jefferson City, Missouri, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 846 RS

1 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Christopher S. 

2 Bond United States Courthouse’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the United States courthouse referred to in sub6 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chris7 topher S. Bond United States Courthouse’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 111 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 846 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

Courthouse. souri, as the Christopher S. Bond United States at 80 Lafayette Street in Jefferson City, MisJULY 22, 2011 

Reported without amendment 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 712 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 712

  To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 31, 2011

  Mr. DeMint (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
    Crapo, Mr. Ensign, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. 
Johanns, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Lee, Mr. McConnell, Mr. 
 Paul, Mr. Risch, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Vitter) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Takeover Repeal Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
(Public Law 111-203) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended by 
such Act are revived or restored as if such Act had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)








The undersigned, Michael J. Cunningham, has executed this certificate in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 30, 2010 (the “Report”).








The undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:








1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and








2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 29th day of March, 2010.








/s/ MICHAELJ. CUNNINGHAM


Michael J. Cunningham


President — Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






64