alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-131885) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-133601, 333-133599, 33-18966-99, 33-46724-99, 33-50270-99,33-57675-99, 33-62394-99, 333-17407-99, 333-25857-99, 333-53912-99, 333-80511-99, 333-107450, and333-107451) of Noble Corporation of our report dated February 27, 2007 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPHouston, TexasFebruary 27, 2007
##### 



Exhibit 12.2
 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
  
    
    the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended November 30, 2006 of OSI Geospatial
Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of OSI Geospatial Inc.
 Date:
    
    May 7, 2007/s/ Kenneth H. KirkpatrickPresident and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
  
    
    the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended November 30, 2006 of OSI Geospatial
Inc..fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of OSI Geospatial Inc.,
 Date:
    
    May 7, 2007/s/ John T. SentjensVice President Finance
EXHIBIT 4.1

March 28, 2008

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

|    |                              
|--- | -----------------------------
|Re: | Pacific State Bancorp        
|    | Commission File No. 000-49892

To whom it may concern:

Pursuant
to the requirements set forth in paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of item 601 of
Regulation S-K, and in connection with the filing of its Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Pacific State Bancorp hereby agrees
to file with the Commission, upon request, a copy of the Companys Indenture
dated June 27, 2007, for its $5.0 Million in principal amount of Floating Rate
Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2037, issued to Pacific State Statutory
Trust III.

PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

|    |                    
|--- | -------------------
|By: | /s/ STEVEN A. ROSSO
|    | Steven A. Rosso    
|    | President/CEO      

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 769 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prevent the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs from prohibiting the use of service dogs on Department of Veterans Affairs property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 8, 2011 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prevent the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from prohibiting the use of 

service dogs on Department of Veterans Affairs property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Equal Treat5 ment for Service Dogs Act of 2011’’ or the ‘‘VETS Dogs 

6 Act of 2011’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

8 Congress makes the following findings: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 769 IS

1 (1) The usage of medical service dogs among 

2 veterans is increasing. 

3 (2) The Department of Veterans Affairs cur4 rently allows seeing-eye dogs in Department facili5 ties. 

6 (3) The Department does not place any limita7 tions on the access of seeing-eye dogs to Department 

8 facilities. 

9 (4) Titles II and III of the Americans with Dis10 abilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12131 et seq. and 

11 12181 et seq.) require that a public entity or place 

12 of public accommodation modify its policies, prac13 tices, and procedures to allow an individual with a 

14 disability to use a service animal. 

15 SEC. 3. USE OF SERVICE DOGS ON PROPERTY OF THE DE16 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

17 Section 1714 of title 38, United States Code, is 

18 amended by adding at the end the following new sub19 section: 

20 ‘‘(e) The Secretary may not prohibit the use of serv21 ice dogs provided under subsection (c) in any facility or 

22 on any property of the Department or in any facility or 

23 on any property that receives funding from the Sec24 retary.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1.1



 Exhibit 10.1.1 

SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO 

CARROLL COMMUNITY BANK 
 EMPLOYEE
STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN 
 EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2011 

WHEREAS, the Carroll Community Bank (the “Bank”) adopted the Carroll Community Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, effective
January 1, 2011 (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Bank desires to amend the Plan to comply with Internal Revenue Code
requirements; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the rights reserved in Section 13.3 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended below as
follows: 
 Changes 

Effective January 1, 2012, add the following sentence before the last sentence in Section 12.4: 

“The term “readily tradable on an established securities market” means employer securities that are readily tradable on an
established securities market within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Section 1.401(a)(35)-1(f)(5) for purposes of Code Section 401(a)(22).” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officers of the Bank have executed this Amendment on this 28th day of December, 2012.
Back to Contents

**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, Lewis Lyons, Vice President, Finance,  and Chief Financial Officer of Deb Shops, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 (1)   the Quarterly Report on Form  10–Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2002 (the  "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 (2)   the information contained in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: December 6, 2002

|               | /s/   Lewis Lyons                                          |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |                                                                           |
|     | Lewis LyonsVice      President, Finance, and      Chief Financial Officer |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00234-CR

Amelia M. ESQUIVEL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR8571

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss appeal filed on 

May 3, 2013 is MOOT. The motion to dismiss appeal filed on May 6, 2013 is GRANTED, and 

this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED May 15, 2013.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Texas United Bancshares, Inc., on Form S-8 (FileNos. 333-100162, 333-100163 and 333-124055) of our report dated February 25, 2005, except for Note B as to which the date is October 7, 2005, on our audit of the financial statements and financial schedules of Texas United Bancshares, Inc., asof December 31, 2004, and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A. 

 

/s/ **BKD,****LLP**

 

Houston, Texas 

October 7, 2005
AVIGEN,
INC.


AMENDMENT 
TO

MANAGEMENT
TRANSITION PLAN


This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Avigen,
Inc. Management Transition Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of August 20,
2009, provided that the majority of the Plan participants who are officers
subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
approves the Amendment in a manner satisfying the requirements of Section 11 of
the Plan. 

     WHEREAS, Section 11 of the
Plan provides that the Company may amend the Plan and any Management Transition
Plan Eligibility Notice at any time; and 

     WHEREAS, the Board deems it
advisable to amend the Plan and each Management Transition Plan Eligibility
Notice of each Plan participant, as set forth herein. 

     NOW, THEREFORE, Section 4(a)(ii)
and Section 4(b)(ii) of the Plan each is hereby amended and restated in its entirety, to read as follows:


“Stock Option Vesting and
Exercisability. Any accelerated vesting and
extended exercisability of your outstanding stock options to acquire common
stock of the Company shall be as set forth in the Management Transition Plan
Eligibility Notice; provided,
however, that notwithstanding any term or
provision in any Management Transition Plan Eligibility Notice to the contrary,
in no event shall the exercisability of any stock option be extended beyond the
effective date of a corporate transaction in which the option will not be
assumed or substituted and as a result, pursuant to the terms of the equity
incentive plan under which such option was granted, will expire if not exercised
not later than immediately prior to such effective date.”
Exhibit 11

                           METRIKA SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                        Computation of Earnings per Share


                               Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                            ------------------------  -------------------------
                              Sept. 27,    Sept. 28,    Sept. 27,     Sept. 28,
                                   1997         1996         1997          1996
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Computation of Primary
   Earnings per Share:

 Net Income (a)             $ 1,843,000  $ 1,146,000  $ 3,785,000   $ 2,425,000
                            -----------  -----------  -----------   -----------
 Shares:
   Weighted average shares
     outstanding              8,267,828    5,000,000    6,768,194     5,000,000

   Add: Shares issuable
        from assumed
        issuance of private
        placement shares
        and the assumed
        exercise of options
        (as determined by
        the application of
        the treasury stock
        method)                       -      193,086        1,923       193,086
                            -----------  -----------  -----------   -----------
   Weighted average
     shares outstanding,
     as adjusted (b)          8,267,828    5,193,086    6,770,117     5,193,086
                            -----------  -----------  -----------   -----------
 Primary Earnings
   per Share (a) / (b)      $       .22  $       .22  $       .56   $       .47
                            ===========  ===========  ===========   ===========
# C_2019372EN.01002301.xml

| 4.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 2 September 2019 — JP v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides

(Case C-651/19)

(2019/C 372/24)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: JP

Defendant: Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides

Question referred

Must Article 46 of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (1) (recast), by virtue of which applicants must be given a right to an effective remedy against decisions ‘taken on their application for international protection’, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding a rule of national procedure, such as Article 39/57 of the Law of 15 December 1980 on entry to the territory, residence, establishment and removal of foreign nationals, read in conjunction with Article 51/2, 5o of the first subparagraph of Article 57/6(3) and Article 57/6/2(1) of that law, establishing a time limit of 10 ‘calendar’ days, starting from the notification of the administrative decision, for bringing an action against a decision declaring a subsequent application for international protection lodged by a third-country national inadmissible, in particular where that notification was made to the Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons where the applicant is ‘deemed’ by law to have elected a domicile?

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of Bi-Optic Ventures Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the

Company.



/s/ Harry Chew

Harry Chew

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

May 28, 2004













































































35
EXHIBIT 31.1  SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION  I, Harry Chew, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Bi-Optic Ventures Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Harry Chew Harry Chew Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer May 29, 2007
# L_2008273EN.01000101.xml

| 15.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 273/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 997/2008

of 14 October 2008

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 October 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 76,4 |
| MK | 52,8 |
| TR | 106,4 |
| ZZ | 78,5 |
| 0707 00 05 | MK | 81,9 |
| TR | 141,7 |
| ZZ | 111,8 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 140,3 |
| ZZ | 140,3 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 75,7 |
| TR | 98,0 |
| UY | 95,7 |
| ZA | 84,4 |
| ZZ | 88,5 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 224,6 |
| TR | 91,6 |
| US | 224,7 |
| ZZ | 180,3 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 67,2 |
| CL | 71,3 |
| CN | 53,8 |
| MK | 35,3 |
| NZ | 88,4 |
| US | 104,9 |
| ZA | 79,5 |
| ZZ | 71,5 |
| 0808 20 50 | CN | 58,4 |
| TR | 76,2 |
| ZA | 98,3 |
| ZZ | 77,6 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

76,4

MK

52,8

TR

106,4

ZZ

78,5

0707 00 05

MK

81,9

TR

141,7

ZZ

111,8

0709 90 70

TR

140,3

ZZ

140,3

0805 50 10

AR

75,7

TR

98,0

UY

95,7

ZA

84,4

ZZ

88,5

0806 10 10

BR

224,6

TR

91,6

US

224,7

ZZ

180,3

0808 10 80

AR

67,2

CL

71,3

CN

53,8

MK

35,3

NZ

88,4

US

104,9

ZA

79,5

ZZ

71,5

0808 20 50

CN

58,4

TR

76,2

ZA

98,3

ZZ

77,6

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
<PAGE>
                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT




The Board of Directors
NovaStar Mortgage, Inc.


We have examined the accompanying management assertion that NovaStar Mortgage,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"), (a wholly owned subsidiary of NovaStar
Financial, Inc.), complied with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, including examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company has complied in all
material respects with the aforementioned minimum servicing as of and for the
period ending December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

February 11, 2002
# C_2019230EN.01002001.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 March 2019 — EIS GmbH v TO

(Case C-266/19)

(2019/C 230/24)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: EIS GmbH

Defendant: TO

Questions referred

| 1. | Is a telephone number ‘available’ within the meaning of the instructions for completion for model instructions on withdrawal set out in Annex I.A to Directive 2011/83/EU (1) if the trader specifies the telephone number within the legal notice or clearly and explicitly displays it on the homepage of his website? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is a telephone number ‘available’ within the meaning of the instructions for completion for model instructions on withdrawal set out in Annex I.A to Directive 2011/83/EU (1) if the trader specifies the telephone number within the legal notice or clearly and explicitly displays it on the homepage of his website?

| 2. | Is a telephone number ‘available’ within the meaning of the instructions for completion for model instructions on withdrawal set out in Annex I.A to Directive 2011/83/EU if, although the trader uses the telephone connection for commercial purposes, he does not use it to enter into distance contracts and therefore does not operate it for the purpose of terminating distance contracts in the form of an acceptance of notices of withdrawal either? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is a telephone number ‘available’ within the meaning of the instructions for completion for model instructions on withdrawal set out in Annex I.A to Directive 2011/83/EU if, although the trader uses the telephone connection for commercial purposes, he does not use it to enter into distance contracts and therefore does not operate it for the purpose of terminating distance contracts in the form of an acceptance of notices of withdrawal either?

---

(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).

---