alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000             DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-2000             DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             494                     494
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      917                     917
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,804                  29,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,079                  35,079
<PP&E>                                          16,412                  16,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,619                   7,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,434                  50,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,784                  11,784
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            72                      72
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,764                  20,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,434                  50,434
<SALES>                                         25,329                  71,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,329                  71,793
<CGS>                                           14,096                  37,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,531                  28,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,564                   5,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 393                   1,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (255)                 (1,228)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (102)                   (491)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (153)                   (737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (153)                   (737)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)                  (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)                  (0.10)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 583 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 583

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit direct 
payment under the Medicare program for clinical social worker services 
          provided to residents of skilled nursing facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2011

  Ms. Mikulski (for herself and Mr. Inouye) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit direct 
payment under the Medicare program for clinical social worker services 
          provided to residents of skilled nursing facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clinical Social Work Medicare Equity 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING DIRECT PAYMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM FOR 
              CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS OF 
              SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1888(e)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395yy(e)(2)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting ``clinical 
social worker services,'' after ``qualified psychologist services,''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1861(hh)(2) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(hh)(2)) is amended by striking ``and 
other than services furnished to an inpatient of a skilled nursing 
facility which the facility is required to provide as a requirement for 
participation''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after the date that 
regulations relating to payment for physicians' services for calendar 
year 2012 take effect, but in no case later than the first day of the 
third month beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Earl Abbott, Chief Executive Officer,
President, Secretary and Treasurer of Tornado Gold International Corporation
(the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
      year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                

Dated: April 14, 2008

/s/ Earl. Abbott
  Earl Abbott
  CEO, President, Secretary and Treasurer
  (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Angstrom
Technologies Corp. and will be retained by Angstrom Technologies Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------


                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Denis A.  Krusos,  the  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer  of
CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Company's  Form 10-Q  Quarterly  Report for the period ended April
          30,  2009 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Denis A. Krusos
                                        -------------------
                                        Denis A. Krusos
                                        Chairman of the Board and
June 17, 2009                           Chief Executive Officer
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 31, 2023

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00435-CV

JAUSHSTEILYEE MARTINEZ, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE 

ESTATE OF ABEL CASTRO, DECEASED, Appellant

V.

K & B PROPERTIES, L.P., KEN ARMSTRONG AND BRIAN BATTLE, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 511,018-402

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from an order signed May 18, 2023. No clerk’s record has 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed 

the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On July 6, 2023, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 
2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed. On 

August 10, 2023, appellant was ordered to provide this court with proof of 

payment for the record on or before August 21, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). 

In the order, we notified appellant that failure to comply with the court’s order 

would result in dismissal of the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response 

was filed.

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution 

and a supplemental motion urging this court to dismiss. Because appellant has not 

provided this court with proof of payment for the record, we grant appellees’

motion and dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Hassan.
#### In re HEARD. In the matter of the Heard accounting.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

No opinion. Motion for stay of proceedings granted. All concur, except ADAMS, J., not voting.
#### SHEEHAN v. MARTIN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 15, 1907.)

Action by Dennis B. Sheehan against Joseph Martin and another.

No opinion. Motion dismissed, with $10 costs. Order filed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41278 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TANESHA BOLAR, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CR-91-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Tanesha Bolar appeals from her convictions for narcotics and firearm offenses. She argues that the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 12
 Alion Science and Technology
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Amounts in thousands)
 Years Ended September 30,Actual Data
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2009Fixed ChargesCash interest expense
    
    $
    9,328
    
    
    $
    19,349
    
    
    $
    33,695
    
    
    $
    49,909
    
    
    $
    52,022Amortization of capitalized expenses
related to indebtedness
    
    
    3,897
    
    
    
    2,591
    
    
    
    3,145
    
    
    
    2,912
    
    
    
    5,067Total fixed charges
    
    $
    13,225
    
    
    $
    21,940
    
    
    $
    36,840
    
    
    $
    52,821
    
    
    $
    57,089EarningsPre-tax earnings (loss)
    
    $
    (40,172
    )
    
    $
    (31,089
    )
    
    $
    (42,770
    )
    
    $
    (25,334
    )
    
    $
    (17,041
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    13,225
    
    
    
    21,940
    
    
    
    36,840
    
    
    
    52,821
    
    
    
    57,089Earnings before fixed charges
    
    $
    (26,947
    )
    
    $
    (9,149
    )
    
    $
    (5,930
    )
    
    $
    27,487
    
    
    $
    40,048Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    (a
    )
    
    
    (a
    )
    
    
    (a
    )
    
    
    0.52
    
    
    
    0.70
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

News Archive (1)headline bar October 2004**Classical Chinese Garden Slated for the Nation's Capital**


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2016

GEORGE ELWOOD ODUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S ASSOCIATION, Local 1751 of Georgetown, South Carolina, Defendant - Appellee, and
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S ASSOCIATION, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-96-3798-2-23) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 3, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Elwood Odum, Appellant Pro Se. Grover Cleveland Seaton, III, Moncks Corner, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The district court’s order was filed on May 14, 1998; the judgment and the order were both entered on the docket on May 19, 1998. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, 79(a). 2 PER CURIAM:George Elwood Odum appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994) complaint and denying hismotion for reconsideration. Odum’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that the union’s summary judgment motion be granted. The district court adopted the magistrate’s report and recommendation. See Odum v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, No. CA-96-3798-2-23 (D.S.C. May 19, 1998). * The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation. See Wells v. Shriners Hosp. , 109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir. 1997); see generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Odum has waived appellate review by failing to timely file objections. Further, the district court did not abuseits discretion in denying Odum’s motion for reconsideration, because Odum’s objections were not timely filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Orpiano v. Johnson , 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Advisory General Medical Sciences Council, September 01, 2021, 09:30 a.m. to September 02, 2021, 05:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 31, 2020, FR Doc 2020-28902, 85 FR 86940.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the meeting date and time from September 1-2, 2021, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. to September 9, 2021, 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: June 14, 2021. 

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-13377 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Med-Emerg International Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr.
      Ramesh Zacharias Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:








1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 15, 2005





By:
            /s/
                Dr. Ramesh ZachariasName:
                Dr. Ramesh ZachariasTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer
#### SOLINGER, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 11, 1907.)

Action by Walter B. Solinger, by Sidney Lowenthal, his guardian ad litem, against the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit

No. 01-2534 STEVEN A. SWAN, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. James R. Muirhead, U.S. Magistrate Judge ]
Before Boudin, Chief Judge , Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge , and Lynch, Circuit Judge .

Steven A. Swan on brief pro se. Eileen J. O’Connor , Assistant Attorney General, David English Carmack and Jeffrey R. Meyer , Attorneys, Tax Division, Department of Justice and T hom as P. Colantuono , United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

May 7, 2002-2- Per Curiam . After carefully reviewing the record and briefs on appeal, we affirmthe judgment for substantially the reasons given below.

The appellant’s primary argument o n ap peal is that the court’s federal question jurisdiction covered his Sixteenth Amendment challenge to his income taxes. A frivolous constitutional issue does not raise a federal que sti on, however . Hagans v. Lavine , 415 U.S. 528 (1974); Molina-Crespo

v. Califano , 583 F.2d 572 (1 st Cir. 1978). The appellant argues that the constitutional issue could not be frivolous because he adducedcredible evidence that Congress intended a n a rrower income tax. He misses the point. The issue is frivolous because it has already been decided, not because the evidence is univocal. The income tax has survived cons titutional challenge. See , e.g. , Eisner v. Macomber , 252 U.S. 189 (1920); Quijano v. Uni ted Stat es , 93 F.3d 26 (1 st Cir. 1996); United States v. Turano , 802 F.2d 10 (1 st Cir. 1986).

The appellant’s remaining arguments merit little discussion. Given the resolution of the constitutional issue, the appellant could not sh ow th at he was certain to prevail, precluding equitable relief. Bob Jones Univer sit yv. Simon , 416 U.S. 725 (1974). The appellant faile d to e stablish jurisdiction under I.R.C. § 7422(a) by showing that he paid the taxes andfiled claims for refunds. McMillen v. United States Department of Treasury , 960 F.2d 187 (1 st Cir. 1991).-3- We hereby deny t he appellant’s motion for return of property and an investigation.

Affirmed . Loc. R. 27(c).