alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37143-37144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2629-014]


Village of Morrisville, Vermont; Notice of Conference Call

    a. Date and Time of Meeting: August 25, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern 
Time.
    b. FERC Contact: Steve Kartalia at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b686f7e6b737e7535707a696f7a77727a5b7d7e6978357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e19295849189848fcf8a809395808d8880a187849382cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a> or 
(202) 502-6131.
    c. Purpose of Meeting: On May 24, 2021, in a filing labeled 
privileged, the Village of Morrisville (Morrisville) requested a 
meeting with Commission staff to receive guidance on its pending 
application to relicense the Morrisville Hydroelectric Project No. 
2629, including potential amendments to the license application or the 
current license. The conference call will provide Morrisville with the 
opportunity to discuss potential amendments with Commission staff.
    d. Proposed Agenda: (1) Introduction of participants; (2) 
Commission staff explains purpose of the meeting; (3) Morrisville 
discusses its potential amendments and seeks guidance from Commission 
staff; (4) Meeting participants discuss questions and topics raised by 
Morrisville; and (5) Commission staff concludes the meeting.
    e. A summary of the meeting will be prepared and filed in the 
Commission's public file for the project.

[[Page 37144]]

    f. All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other 
interested parties are invited to participate by phone. If interested, 
please contact Steve Kartalia at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94e7e0f1e4fcf1fabafff5e6e0f5f8fdf5d4f2f1e6f7baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7d4d3c2d7cfc2c989ccc6d5d3c6cbcec6e7c1c2d5c489c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 
502-6131, by August 23, 2021, to receive a link and invitation to the 
conference call.

    Dated: July 8, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14944 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 128 (Thursday, July 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36090-36091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Proposed New Fee Site

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of new fee site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Payette National Forest is proposing to charge a new fee 
at four cabins including Paddy Flat, Burgdorf, Warren Bunkhouse, and 
Warren Ranger cabins. These units are currently not in use by the 
public. Rentals of other cabins on the Payette National Forest have 
shown people appreciate and enjoy the availability of rental cabins.

DATES: Comments will be accepted through September 30, 2021. New fees 
would go into effect in the spring of 2022, if possible.

ADDRESSES: Payette National Forest, Attention: Linda Jackson, 500 N 
Mission St., McCall, Idaho 83638

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Simpson, Recreation Specialist, 
208-634-0757. Information about proposed fee changes can also be found 
on the Payette National Forest website: http://www.fs.usda.gov/payette.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish a six-month advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new 
recreation fee areas are established. A market analysis indicated that 
the

[[Page 36091]]

proposed fees are both reasonable and acceptable for the type of 
recreation experience they provide.
    Once public involvement is complete, these new fees will be 
reviewed by a Resource Advisory Committee prior to a final decision and 
implementation.
    Cabins will be available for overnight rental at $160 per night for 
the Burgdorf Guard Station, $100 per night for the Paddy Flat Guard 
Station, and $120 per night for a bunkhouse and $130 per night for a 
cabin at the Warren Guard Station. Seasons for each of these sites will 
be July 1 to September 30. Fees are assessed based on the level of 
amenities and services provided, cost of operation and maintenance, and 
market assessment. Funds from the rental will be used for the continued 
operation and maintenance of these sites.
    People wanting to rent any of these sites will need to do so 
through Recreation.gov, at www.recreation.gov or by calling 1-877-444-
6777. Recreation.gov charges an $8 fee for reservations.

    Dated: July 1, 2021.
Jennifer Eberlien,
Associate Deputy Chief, NFS.
[FR Doc. 2021-14541 Filed 7-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P
IB 

House Calendar No. 101 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2383 

[Report No. 109–247] 

To redesignate the facility of the Bureau of Reclamation located at 19550 

Kelso Road in Byron, California, as the ‘‘C.W. ‘Bill’ Jones Pumping Plant’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2005 

Mr. NUNES (for himself, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. COSTA, and 

Mr. CARDOZA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

OCTOBER 17, 2005 

Additional sponsor: Mr. CALVERT

OCTOBER 17, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To redesignate the facility of the Bureau of Reclamation 

located at 19550 Kelso Road in Byron, California, as 

the ‘‘C.W. ‘Bill’ Jones Pumping Plant’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2383 RH 

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF FACILITY. 

2 The facility of the Bureau of Reclamation located at 

3 19550 Kelso Road in Byron, California, and known as the 

4 Tracy Pumping Plant, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘C.W. ‘Bill’ Jones Pumping Plant’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘C.W. ‘Bill’ Jones Pumping Plant’’. 

House Calendar No. 101 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2383 

[Report No. 109–247] 

A BILL 

To redesignate the facility of the Bureau of RecPlant’’. California, as the ‘‘C.W. ‘Bill’ Jones Pumping lamation located at 19550 Kelso Road in Byron, 

OCTOBER 17, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Ralph Smith

*Louis S. Avitabile,*in support of the petition.

*Leon F. Dalbec, Jr.,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided November 9, 1989

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 646, is denied.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Tropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit: Hilo, HI
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Scientist Pages
                        Scott Geib
                                    Sheina Sim
                                    Charles MasonSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Hilo, Hawaii Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center Tropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles  USDA's Agricultural Research Service Honors Scientists of the YearApr 24, 2024


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### EDWARD B. STAFFORD SMITH *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. FORTUNATUS S. KIRKPATRICK *ET AL.,*DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

See same case below: 59 *N. J. Super.*553.

*Mr. Frank J. Valgenti, Jr.,*and *Mr. Charles M. Judge*for the petitioners.

*Messrs. Bhanley <& Fisher*and *Mr. J. William Baria*for the respondents.

May 4, 1960.

Denied.
| Wholly Owned Subsidiaries        | Country of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                             |                     |
| Torm Singapore (Pte) Ltd.        | Singapore                |
| TORM Norge AS                    | Norway                   |
| Torm Shipping (Germany) G.m.b.H. | Germany                  |
| Long Range 1 A/S                 | Denmark                  |
| Medium Range A/S                 | Denmark                  |
| LR1 Management K/S               | Denmark                  |
| MR Management K/S                | Denmark                  |
| Ruby Shipping LLC                    | Marshall Islands |
|--------------------------------------|------------------|
| Ganges Shipping LLC                  | Marshall Islands |
| Libra Tankers Shipping LLC           | Marshall Islands |
| Tiber Shipping LLC                   | Marshall Islands |
| OMI Marine Service Ltd.              | Delaware         |
| OMI Holding Ltd.                     | Mauritius        |
| OMI Crewing Service Ltd.             | Bermuda          |
| TORM USA LLC                         | Delaware         |
| TORM Shipping India Pte Ltd.         | India            |
| TT Shipowning K/S                    | Denmark          |
| Torghatten & Torm Shipowning ApS | Denmark          |

| Jointly Controlled Entities      | Country of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                             |                     |
| Long Range 2 A/S                 | Denmark                  |
| LR2 Management K/S               | Denmark                  |
| UT Shipowning K/S                | Denmark                  |
| Ugland & Torm Shipowning ApS | Denmark                  |
| TORM SHIPPING (PHILS.), INC.     | Philippines              |
| FR8 Holdings Pte. Ltd.           | Singapore                |
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 57 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the application 

of the tonnage tax on certain vessels. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the application of the tonnage tax on certain vessels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE 

4 TONNAGE TAX ON VESSELS OPERATING IN 

5 THE DUAL UNITED STATES DOMESTIC AND 

6 FOREIGN TRADES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of section 1355 of 

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions 

9 and special rules) is amended to read as follows: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 57 IS

1 ‘‘(f) EFFECT OF OPERATING A QUALIFYING VESSEL

2 IN THE DUAL UNITED STATES DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN

3 TRADES.—For purposes of this subchapter— 

4 ‘‘(1) an electing corporation shall be treated as 

5 continuing to use a qualifying vessel in the United 

6 States foreign trade during any period of use in the 

7 United States domestic trade, and 

8 ‘‘(2) gross income from such United States do9 mestic trade shall not be excluded under section 

10 1357(a), but shall not be taken into account for pur11 poses of section 1353(b)(1)(B) or for purposes of 

12 section 1356 in connection with the application of 

13 section 1357 or 1358.’’. 

14 (b) REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR ALLOCATION OF

15 CREDITS, INCOME, AND DEDUCTIONS.—Section 1358 of 

16 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to allocation 

17 of credits, income, and deductions) is amended— 

18 (1) by striking ‘‘in accordance with this sub19 section’’ in subsection (c) and inserting ‘‘to the ex20 tent provided in such regulations as may be pre21 scribed by the Secretary’’, and 

22 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub23 section: 

24 ‘‘(d) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall prescribe 

25 regulations consistent with the provisions of this subVerDate Mar 15 2010 16:23 Jan 28, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S57.IS S57

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 57 IS

1 chapter for the purpose of allocating gross income, deduc2 tions, and credits between or among qualifying shipping 

3 activities and other activities of a taxpayer.’’. 

4 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

5 (1) Section 1355(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

6 Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘exclusively’’. 

7 (2) Section 1355(b)(1)(B) of such Code is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘as a qualifying vessel’’ and in9 serting ‘‘in the transportation of goods or pas10 sengers’’. 

11 (3) Section 1355 of such Code is amended— 

12 (A) by striking subsection (g), and 

13 (B) by redesignating subsection (h) as sub14 section (g). 

15 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Travers, Appellant.

[945 NYS2d 169]—

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County *1240Court, Suffolk County (Iliou, J.), rendered May 12, 2011, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the sentencing court, during its inquiry into allegations that he violated the conditions of his plea and of his release under the judicial diversion program *(see*CPL art 216), deprived him of his right to due process when it relied upon unsworn testimony.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257 [2011]).

Sentencing is a critical stage of the criminal proceeding and must satisfy the requirements of due process *(see People v Fiammegta,*14 NY3d 90, 96 [2010]; *People v Outley,*80 NY2d 702, 712 [1993]). In order to comply with due process, the sentencing court must assure itself that the information upon which it bases the sentence is reliable and accurate *(see People v Outley,*80 NY2d at 712). “In determining whether a defendant violated a condition of his or her release under the judicial diversion program, the court may conduct a summary hearing consistent with due process and sufficient to satisfy the court that the defendant has, in fact, violated the condition” (CPL 216.05 [9] [b]; *see People v Fiammegta,*14 NY3d at 96). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentencing court properly relied upon, inter alia, unsworn testimony in determining that he violated the conditions of his plea and of his release under the judicial diversion program *(cf. People v Fiammegta,*14 NY3d at 96).

The defendant’s reliance upon CPL 410.70 (1) and *People v Almonte*(50 AD3d 696 [2008]) is misplaced, as the County Court did not revoke a sentence of probation. Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.
#### HAYDEN, Appellant, v. UNION TRUST CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 8, 1907.)

Action by John J. Hayden against the Union Trust Company. W. R. Osborn, for appellant. H. H. Man, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1932 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1932

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to standardize the grade 
 specified by law for the senior dental officer of the Air Force with 
             that of the senior dental officer of the Army.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

   Mrs. Miller of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to standardize the grade 
 specified by law for the senior dental officer of the Air Force with 
             that of the senior dental officer of the Army.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STANDARDIZATION OF GRADE OF SENIOR DENTAL OFFICER OF THE AIR 
              FORCE WITH THAT OF SENIOR DENTAL OFFICER OF THE ARMY.

    (a) Air Force Assistant Surgeon General for Dental Services.--
Section 8081 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``brigadier general'' in the second sentence and inserting ``major 
general''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the occurrence of the next vacancy in the 
position of Assistant Surgeon General for Dental Services in the Air 
Force that occurs after the date of the enactment of this Act or, if 
earlier, on the date of the appointment to the grade of major general 
of the officer who is the incumbent in that position on the date of the 
enactment of the Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 682 

To provide for reliquidation of certain entries of medium density fiberboard. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2011 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for reliquidation of certain entries of medium 

density fiberboard. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ENTRIES OF ME4 DIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, if a request described in subsection (c) is 

8 filed with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Cus9 toms and Border Protection shall liquidate or reliquidate 

10 entries described in subsection (b) at the rate of duty of 

11 3.2 percent ad valorem. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 682 IS

1 (b) ENTRIES DESCRIBED.—The entries described in 

2 this subsection are entries of fiberboard produced using 

3 the dry method of production, otherwise known as medium 

4 density fiberboard— 

5 (1) that were classified under subheading 

6 4411.19.40 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

7 the United States at the time of entry; 

8 (2) that are substantially similar to the mer9 chandise that was the subject of the Court of Inter10 national Trade and the Court of Appeals for the 

11 Federal Circuit decisions in Faus Group, Inc. v. 

12 United States, 581 F.3d 1369 (2009), and Witex 

13 USA, Inc. v. United States, 333 Fed. App 569 

14 (2009); 

15 (3) that were entered on or after January 1, 

16 1998, and before January 1, 2002; 

17 (4) that were produced using the dry method of 

18 production; and 

19 (5) with respect to which a request for reliqui20 dation, provided for in subsection (c), is filed. 

21 (c) REQUEST FOR RELIQUIDATION.— 

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—Any importer seeking a liq23 uidation or reliquidation pursuant to subsection (a) 

24 shall file a proper request with U.S. Customs and 

25 Border Protection before the 90th day after the date 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 682 IS

1 of the enactment of this Act that contains sufficient 

2 information to enable U.S. Customs and Border 

3 Protection— 

4 (A) to locate the entry; or 

5 (B) to reconstruct the entry if it cannot be 

6 located. 

7 (2) INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED.—The in8 formation required by this subsection may include 

9 the Entry Summary Documents (CBP Form 7501) 

10 for the entries and supporting documents needed to 

11 demonstrate to the satisfaction of U.S. Customs and 

12 Border Protection that the merchandise was entered. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 400 

To amend the Federal Power Act to ensure that rates and charges for 

electric energy are assessed in proportion to measurable reliability or 

economic benefit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2011 

Mr. CORKER (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BURR, Mr. 

GRAHAM, Mr. CHAMBLISS, and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to ensure that rates and 

charges for electric energy are assessed in proportion 

to measurable reliability or economic benefit, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALLOCATION OF RATES OR CHARGES FOR 

4 ELECTRIC ENERGY. 

5 Section 205 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

6 824d) is amended— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 400 IS

1 (1) by striking the section heading and all that 

2 follows through ‘‘(a) All’’ and inserting the fol3 lowing: 

4 ‘‘SEC. 205. RATES AND CHARGES. 

5 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— 

6 ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—Subject to paragraph 

7 (2), all’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(2) ALLOCATION.—No rate or charge for or in 

10 connection with the transmission of electric energy 

11 contained in any filing made under subsection (c) or 

12 any proceeding initiated under section 206(a) after 

13 June 17, 2010, shall be considered just and reason14 able unless the rate or charge is based on an alloca15 tion of costs for new transmission facilities that is 

16 reasonably proportionate to measurable economic or 

17 reliability benefits projected, as determined by the 

18 Commission, to accrue to the 1 or more persons that 

19 pay the rate or charge.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS