alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 
 **Certification
Pursuant to Section 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Robert V.
McLemore (HouseRaising President and Founder)**
 
 I, Robert
V. McLemore, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 of
HouseRaising, Inc. (“registrant”);
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation.; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information (all of which do not apply); and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls (all of which do
not apply).
  ****Date: March 30,
2005
    By:
    /s/ Robert V.
    McLemoreName: Robert V. McLemoreTitle:  President and
      Founder
EXHIBIT 31.3

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Daryl Stemm, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2007 of Home Director, Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Home Director, Inc,
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) Home Director Inc.`s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Home Director, Inc, and have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to Home Director, Inc, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of Home Director, Inc.`s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c) disclosed in this report any change in Home Director, Inc.`s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Home Director, Inc.`s most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Home Director, Inc.`s internal control over financial
reporting.

5) Home Director, Inc.`s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Home Director, Inc.`s auditors and the audit committee of Home Director, Inc.`s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect Home Director, Inc.`s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in Home Director, Inc.`s internal
control over financial reporting.



Dated: November 16, 2007                          /s/ Daryl Stemm
                                                  ------------------
                                                  Daryl Stemm
                                                  Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JACINTO LOPEZ-BARBA, a.k.a.

Guadalupe Hernandez-Barba,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-10258

D.C. No. CR-06-00968-JMR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John M. Roll, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jacinto Lopez-Barba appeals from 70-month sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lopez-Barba’s

FILED

MAR 08 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-10258

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We

dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d

1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Howard Root, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Howard RootHoward RootChief Executive OfficerApril 25, 2007






---
#### Jay POTTER; Connie Potter; American RV Park, Inc., Appellants, v. TONTITOWN, CITY OF; Tontitown Planning Commission; Tontitown Water and Sewer Commission; Washington County Election Commission; Mick Wagner, Appellees.

No. 07-3149.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2008.

Filed: Jan. 12, 2009.

David Westbrook Doss, Richard Walden, Jones *&*Jones, Fayetteville, AR, for Appellants.

J.R. Carroll, Constance G. Clark, Mark W. Dossett, Jeff M. Fletcher, Davis & Wright, Fayetteville, AR, George E. Butler, Jr., Fayetteville, AR, Curtis E. Hogue, Hall & Estill, Fayetteville, AR, for Appellees.

Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jay and Connie Potter and American RV Park, Inc. (the Potters) appeal the district court’s1 order dismissing their civil rights lawsuit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Contrary to the Potters’ assertion, the district court did not convert the Rule 12(b)(6) motion into one for summary judgment. *See Levy v. Ohl,*477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir.2007) (public records, such as court records, may be considered in deciding Rule 12(b)(6) motion); *Quinn v. Ocwen Fed. Bank FSB,*470 F.3d 1240, 1244 (8th Cir.2006) (per curiam) (written instruments attached to complaint are part of it for all purposes, and may be considered in ruling on Rule 12(b)(6) motion). Having carefully considered the Potters’ arguments for reversal, *19we agree with the district court that the conduct they described does not rise to the level of a substantive due process violation, and that their allegations indicated the identified parties were not similarly situated in all relevant respects, so as to state an equal protection claim.2*See Bell Atlantic v. Twombly,*550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1964-65 *&*n. 3, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (factual allegations must be sufficient to show more than just speculative right to relief; complaint must contain more than labels and conclusions or “formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action”); *Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.,*517 F.3d 544, 549 (8th Cir.) (reviewing de novo dismissal for failure to state claim, taking all facts alleged in complaint as true), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 222, 172 L.Ed.2d 142 (2008). The district court also did not err by declining to exercise jurisdiction over the state law claims, and dismissing them without prejudice. *See Gibson v. Weber,*433 F.3d 642, 647 (8th Cir.2006) (Congress clearly gave district courts discretion in 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) to dismiss supplemental state-law claims once all federal claims have been dismissed). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Potters have waived their other federal claims. *See Griffith v. City of Des Moines,*387 F.3d 733, 739 (8th Cir.2004).

1

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

         I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Royal & Sun Alliance Bond-Backed Series 2002-2 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
         Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
         servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
         respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report
         of the Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
         omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
         in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
         not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
         provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
         under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
         such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
         based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
         Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 29, 2004


         /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
------------------------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President


                                      8
#### Mohammad Zinnah, Respondent, v Isabella City Carting Corp. et al., Appellants.

[941 NYS2d 627]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered August 3, 2011, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Assuming that defendants met their burden, the record presents triable issues of fact as to whether the injuries plaintiff sustained to his lumbar spine and to his cervical spine were serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Plaintiff submitted the affirmed MRI reports revealing multiple herniations, as well as the affirmation of a neurologist who found diminished range of motion in multiple planes, and attributed the subject accident as the cause. Plaintiff also submitted the affidavit of his chiropractor who noted diminished ranges of motion, addressed causation, and explicitly rejected degeneration as the cause of the spinal injuries *(see Yuen v Arka Memory Cab Corp.,*80 AD3d 481 [2011]). In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to address plaintiffs proof with respect to the injuries he sustained to his left knee *(see Linton v Nawaz,*14 NY3d 821 [2010]).

Defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law as to the 90/180-day claim. Defendants failed to meet their burden as to causation, and none of their experts examined plaintiff during the relevant period of time *(see Feaster v Boulabat,*77 AD3d 440 [2010]; *Alexandre v Dweck,*44 AD3d 597 [2007]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2



SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of Bi-Optic Ventures Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry Chew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the

Company.



/s/ Harry Chew

Harry Chew

Chief Financial Officer

May 29, 2008
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 37167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14931]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Mechanism for Time-Sensitive Drug Abuse Research.
    Date: July 27, 2021.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sheila Pirooznia, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Review, Scientific Review Branch, 
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, 
MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9350, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 8, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-14931 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Masika Ray-Brown, Appellant

No. 06-13-00037-CV v.

Longview Independent School District, 

Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2012-90-

B). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the summary judgment of 

the court below. We affirm the summary judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Masika Ray-Brown, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 26, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 127573 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 127573 

 COA: 250581 

Kent CC: 02-010334-FC 

GORDON MARTIN LYONS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
Exhibit
10.39




Agreement
on Debt Transfer and Offset




Party A:  Tianyuan
Capital Development Co., Ltd.




Party B:Tianshi
International Holdings Group Co., Ltd.




Party C:  Tianjin
Tianshi Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.







Party A,
Party B and Party C enter into this Agreement on December 31, 2009, which shall
be observed by all parties of this Agreement.


Whereas,
Party A is a creditor of Party B and Party B is a creditor of Party C. After
consultation, Party A, Party B and Party C agree the provisions as
follows:


1.           Party
C pays off the loan payable of USD3,283,468.66 (principal of USD3,202,742 and
USD80,726.66 is the interest) to Party A in place of Party B;


2.           Party
B writes off the debt of Party C with the same amount;


3.           Party
A, Party B and Party C shall perform this Agreement, including writing proper
receipts on December 31, 2009.


4.           This
Agreement is effective as of the date first written above and is signed by three
parties for confirmation.





Party A:  Tianyuan
Capital Development Co., Ltd.


Legal
Representative: Jinyuan Li


Signature:  /s/ Jinyuan
Li





Party B:Tianshi
international Holdings Group Co., Ltd.


Legal
Representative:  Jinyuan Li


Signature:/s/ Jinyuan
Li




Party C:  Tianjin
Tianshi Biological EngineeringCo.,
Ltd.


Legal
Representative:  Jinyuan Li


Signature:/s/ Jinyuan
Li
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00046-TLS-SLC

)

WESLEY L. NELSON )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge

Susan Collins, on October 18, 2016, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for

Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on

the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney

and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not

guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant

be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the single-count Indictment, and have sentence

imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and Recommendation

be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled before Judge Theresa

L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation

are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 18th day of October 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2