Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 128 / Thursday, July 8, 2021 / Notices 36099 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Reviews, 85 FR 47731 (August 

6, 2020) (Initiation Notice); see also Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 54983, 54990 

(September 3, 2020) (Initiation Notice Correction), 

correcting the Initiation Notice. 

2See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, from the People’s 

Republic of China: Rescission, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 85 FR 76527 (November 30, 2020). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

section 325.2(1) of the Regulations (15 

CFR 325.2(1)): 

• Bear Nut Republic, Chico, CA 

• JSS Almonds, LLC, Bakersfield, CA 

• VF Marking Corporation DBA Vann 

Family Orchards, Williams, CA 

CAEA’s proposed amendment of its 

Certificate would result in the following 

Members list: 

Almonds California Pride, Inc., Caruthers, 

CA 

Baldwin-Minkler Farms, Orland, CA 

Bear Nut Republic, Chico, CA 

Blue Diamond Growers, Sacramento, CA 

Campos Brothers, Caruthers, CA 

Chico Nut Company, Chico, CA 

Del Rio Nut Company, Livingston, CA 

Fair Trade Corner, Inc., Chico, CA 

Fisher Nut Company, Modesto, CA 

Hilltop Ranch, Inc., Ballico, CA 

Hughson Nut, Inc., Hughson, CA 

JSS Almonds, LLC, Bakersfield, CA 

Mariani Nut Company, Winters, CA 

Nutco, LLC d.b.a. Spycher Brothers, Turlock, 

CA 

Pearl Crop, Inc., Stockton, CA 

P–R Farms, Inc., Clovis, CA 

Roche Brothers International Family Nut Co., 

Escalon, CA 

RPAC, LLC, Los Banos, CA 

South Valley Almond Company, LLC, Wasco, 

CA 

Stewart & Jasper Marketing, Inc., Newman, 

CA 

SunnyGem, LLC, Wasco, CA 

VF Marking Corporation DBA Vann Family 

Orchards, Williams, CA 

Western Nut Company, Chico, CA 

Wonderful Pistachios & Almonds, LLC, Los 

Angeles, CA 

Dated: July 2, 2021. 

Joseph Flynn, 

Director, Office of Trade and Economic 

Analysis, International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14596 Filed 7–7–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Notice of an Opportunity To Apply for 

Membership on the United States 

Investment Advisory Council; 

Correction 

AGENCY: SelectUSA, United States 

Investment Advisory Council (IAC), 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: The International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce published a document in the 

Federal Register on May 17, 2021 

concerning the notice of an opportunity 

to apply for membership on the 

Investment Advisory Council. 

Corrections were made to the deadline 

for submitting information for 

consideration serve on the IAC. 

DATES: Applications for immediate 

consideration for membership must be 

received by the Office of SelectUSA by 

5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) 

on Monday, August 2, 2021. The 

International Trade Administration will 

continue to accept applications under 

this notice for two years from the 

deadline to fill any vacancies. 

ADDRESSES: Please submit application 

information by email to IAC@trade.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rachel David, SelectUSA, U.S. 

Department of Commerce; telephone: 

(202) 302–6858; email: IAC@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of May 17, 

2021, in FR Doc. 2021–10358, on page 

26696, in the third column, fifth 

paragraph under DATES correct the 

caption to read: Applications for 

immediate consideration for 

membership must be received by the 

Office of SelectUSA by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on 

Monday, August 2, 2021. The 

International Trade Administration will 

continue to accept applications under 

this notice for two years from the 

deadline to fill any vacancies. 

William Burwell, 

Deputy Executive Director, SelectUSA. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14608 Filed 7–7–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results and Intent To 

Rescind the Review, in Part; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that certain companies under review 

sold tapered roller bearings and parts 

thereof, finished and unfinished, (TRBs) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) at less than normal value (NV) 

during the period of review (POR), June 

1, 2019, through May 31, 2020. 

Additionally, we preliminarily 

determine that certain companies did 

not make a bona fide sale of TRBs from 

China during the POR and preliminary 

intend to rescind the review with 

respect to these companies. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable July 8, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex 

Wood, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1959. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 6, 2020, Commerce 

published a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on TRBs 

from China covering the period June 1, 

2019, through May 31, 2020, with 

respect to 10 companies.1 In November 

2020, following timely withdrawal of 

their requests for review, we rescinded 

the review with respect to four 

companies.2 This review now covers 

BRTEC Wheel Hub Bearing Co., Ltd. 

(BRTEC); C&U Group Shanghai Bearing 

Co., Ltd. (C&U Group); Hebei Xintai 

Bearing Forging Co., Ltd. (Hebei Xintai); 

Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd., 

(Tainai); Xinchang Newsun Xintianlong 

Precision Bearing Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd. (XTL); and Zhejiang Jingli Bearing 

Technology Co. Ltd. (Jingli). 

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3 A 

list of topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

included in the appendix to this notice. 

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
36100 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 128 / Thursday, July 8, 2021 / Notices 

4See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 

‘‘Discussion of the Methodology.’’ 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Analysis of the Bona Fides 

of BRTEC Wheel Hub Bearing Co., Ltd.’s Sale,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice; and Memorandum, ‘‘Analysis of the 

Bona Fides of Zhejiang Jingli Bearing Technology 

Co. Ltd.’s Sale,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (collectively, Bona 

Fides Memoranda). 

6See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 

(for general filing requirements). 

7See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. 

Scope of the Order 

Imports covered by the order are 

shipments of tapered roller bearings and 

parts thereof, finished and unfinished, 

from China; flange, take up cartridge, 

and hanger units incorporating tapered 

roller bearings; and tapered roller 

housings (except pillow blocks) 

incorporating tapered rollers, with or 

without spindles, whether or not for 

automotive use. These products are 

currently classifiable under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) subheadings 8482.20.00, 

8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 8482.99.45, 

8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.30.80, 

8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.80, 

8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 

8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 

8708.99.8115, and 8708.99.8180. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.4

China-Wide Entity 

The C&U Group did not submit a 

separate rate application; therefore, it 

has failed to rebut de facto and de jure 

control by the Government of China. 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that C&U Group is not eligible for a 

separate rate and is a part of the Chinawide entity. 

Under Commerce’s current policy 

regarding the conditional review of the 

China-wide entity, the China-wide 

entity will not be under review unless 

a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity in this 

review, the entity is not under review 

and the entity’s rate is not subject to 

change (i.e., 92.84 percent). 

Preliminary Partial Recession of the AD 

Administrative Review 

As discussed in the Bona Fides 

Analysis Memoranda,5 Commerce 

preliminarily finds that the sales made 

by BRTEC and Jingli, which serve as the 

basis for our review of these companies, 

are not bona fide sales. Commerce 

reached this conclusion based on the 

totality of the circumstances 

surrounding the reported sales. Further, 

given that the factual information used 

in our bona fides analysis of BRTEC’s 

and Jingli’s sales involves business 

proprietary information, see the Bona 

Fides Memoranda for a full discussion 

of the basis for our preliminary findings. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

That Are Eligible for a Separate Rate 

Commerce calculated an individual 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margin for Tainai, the only individually 

examined exporter/producer in this 

investigation. Because the only 

individually calculated weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

otherwise available, the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for 

Tainai is the basis to determine the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the separate rate, non-examined 

companies, consistent with section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act which provides 

for the determination of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

all other producers and exporters in an 

investigation. 

As indicated in the ‘‘Preliminary 

Results of Review’’ section below, we 

preliminarily determine that a 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

36.75 percent applies to the two 

companies not selected for individual 

examination which are eligible for a 

separate rate (i.e., Hebei Xintai and 

XTL). For further information, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 

‘‘Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for 

the Separate Rate Companies.’’ 

Preliminary Results of Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

June 1, 2019, through May 31, 2020: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., 

Ltd ........................................... 36.75 

Hebei Xintai Bearing Forging 

Co., Ltd ................................... 36.75 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Xinchang Newsun Xintianlong 

Precision Bearing Manufacturing Co., Ltd ......................... 36.75 

Disclosure 

Commerce will disclose calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

to the parties within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Public Comment 

Case briefs or other written comments 

may be submitted to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. Interested parties will be 

notified of the deadlines for the 

submission of case briefs and written 

comments at a later date. Rebuttal briefs, 

limited to issues raised in case briefs, 

may be submitted no later than seven 

days after the deadline date for case 

briefs.6 Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this administrative review are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a 

written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, within 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain the party’s name, 

address, and telephone number, the 

number of participants, and a list of the 

issues to be discussed. Oral 

presentations at the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the time and date for 

the hearing.7

All submissions must be filed 

electronically using ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the 

established due date. Note that 

Commerce has temporarily modified 

certain of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 128 / Thursday, July 8, 2021 / Notices 36101 

8See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006 

(March 26, 2020); and Temporary Rule Modifying 

AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; 

Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 

2020). 

9See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

10See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification). 

11See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

12 Id. 

13See Final Modification, 77 FR at 8103. 

14See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 3987 (January 

22, 2009). 

proprietary information, until further 

notice.8

Unless otherwise extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

which will include the results of its 

analysis of all issues raised in the case 

briefs, within 120 days after the date of 

these preliminary results, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results of 

the administrative review, Commerce 

will determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review.9

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after date of publication of the final 

results of this review in the Federal 

Register. If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 

For each individually examined 

respondent in this review whose 

weighted-average dumping margin in 

the final results of review is not zero or 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), 

Commerce intends to calculate 

importer-specific assessment rates for 

antidumping duties, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).10 Where the 

respondent reported reliable entered 

values, Commerce intends to calculate 

importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rates by aggregating the 

amount of dumping calculated for all 

U.S. sales to the importer and dividing 

this amount by the total entered value 

of the merchandise sold to the 

importer.11 Where the respondent did 

not report entered values, Commerce 

will calculate importer-specific 

assessment rates by dividing the amount 

of dumping for reviewed sales to the 

importer by the total quantity of those 

sales. Commerce will calculate an 

estimated ad valorem importer-specific 

assessment rate to determine whether 

the per-unit assessment rate is de 

minimis; however, Commerce will use 

the per-unit assessment rate where 

entered values were not reported.12

Where an importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rate is not zero or de 

minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

collect the appropriate duties at the time 

of liquidation. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, or an 

importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.13

For the final results, if we continue to 

treat the C&U Group as part of Chinawide entity, we will instruct CBP to 

apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 

92.84 percent, the rate previously 

established for the China-wide entity,14

to all entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR that were exported or 

produced by the C&U Group. 

For the companies which are 

receiving a separate rate and which 

were not individually examined, their 

assessment rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

determined in the final results of this 

review. 

For BRTEC and Jingli, if the review is 

rescinded for these two companies, then 

Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate, as entered, the entries 

associated with these two companies. In 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of 

the Act, the final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated antidumping duties, where 

applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above which have a 

separate rate the cash deposit rate will 

be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, then a cash 

deposit rate of zero will be established 

for that company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be equal to 

the exporter-specific weighted-average 

dumping margin published for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) for all Chinese exporters 

of subject merchandise that have not 

been found to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

cash deposit rate established for the 

China-wide entity, 92.84 percent; and 

(4) for all exporters of subject 

merchandise that are not located in 

China and that are not eligible for a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results of review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(l), 

751(a)(2)(B), and 777(i)(l) of the Act, and 

19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: June 30, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–14559 Filed 7–7–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1