alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Sherice P. Bench certify that: 1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K/A of American Achievement
Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have; a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
reports based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date:
August 5, 2005 /s/ SHERICE P. BENCHName: Sherice P. BenchTitle: Chief Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). P D M / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C HA R L E S N. B R OWN, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. J O H N R E X , M .D .; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 35809 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 7 - CV - 0 0 6 3 7 - BR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon A nnaJ . B r ow n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C harl es N . B row n, an O re go n st at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en td i sm i ssi n g h i s 4 2 U . S . C . § 1 9 8 3 act i o n fo r fai l u re t o ex h au st 

# FI LED JAN 11 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSP D M / Res ea r ch 08- 35809 2 a d mi n i s tr a t i v e r e me d i e s p u r s u an tt o th e Pr i s o n Li t i g a t i o n Re f o rm A c t , 4 2 U . S. C. § 1997e ( a ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s uantt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de n o v o th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d is m is s a l f o rf a ilu r e to e x h au s t, an df

o rc le are rr o rits f a c tu a l d e te rm in a tio n s , W y at t v . T e rhune , 315 F . 3d 1108, 1117 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , and w e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d the a c t i on be c aus e B r ow n di d not c om pl e t e the a dm i ni s tr a t i ve appe a l s pr oc e s s i n a c c or danc e w i th the a dm i ni s tr a t i ve p r o c e du r a l ru le s o rd e m o n s tr a te th a t h e w a s o b s tru c te df r o m d o in g s o . See W oodf ord v . N go , 548 U . S . 81, 90- 91 ( 2006) ( e xpl a i ni ng tha t“ pr ope re xhaus t i on” u n d e r§ 1 9 9 7 e ( a ) r e q u ir e s in m a te s to c o m p le te “a ll s te p s th a t th e a g e n c yh o ld s o u t” a n dto f o llo w a d m in is tr a tiv e p r o c e du r a l ru le s ) ; se e al so McKi nn eyv. Carey , 311 F . 3 d1 1 9 8 , 1 1 9 9 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ) (p er cu ri am ) (req u i ri n g i n m at es t o ex h au st a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s p r io rto f ilin g s u it in f

e d e r a l c o u rt) . W e w ill n o t c o n s id e rd o c u m e n ts p r e s e n te df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See U ni te d States v . E l i as , 92 1 F . 2d 87 0, 87 4 (9th C i r. 19 90 ) ( expl ai ni ng that d o c u m e n ts n o t p r e s e n te dto th e d is tr ic t c o u rt ar e n o t p art o f th e r e c o r do n ap p e a l) . B r o w n ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . AF F I RME D.
#### In the Matter of Bernhard Goetz, Petitioner, v Stephen G. Crane et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the prosecution of New York County indictment No. 1914/85, and to compel the dismissal of the said indictment, dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner in the instant proceeding stands charged in an indictment, handed up by a New York County Grand Jury, with four counts of an attempt to commit the crime of murder in the second degree, four counts of assault in the first degree, one count of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, *730and one count of reckless endangerment in the first degree. In this article 78 proceeding, petitioner maintains that the respondent, Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, abused his discretion in granting respondent District Attorney’s application for resubmission of charges pursuant to CPL 190.75 (3).

We conclude that the proceeding must be dismissed. The remedy of prohibition does not lie as a means of seeking collateral review of an alleged error of law in a pending criminal matter. *(Matter of Gold v Gartenstein,*54 NY2d 627 [1981]; *Matter of State of New York v King,*36 NY2d 59 [1975].) Article 78 jurisdiction also does not lie to review, during the pendency of a criminal action, exercises of judicial discretion. *(Matter of Bloeth v Marks,*20 AD2d 372 [1st Dept 1964], *lv denied*15 NY2d 481; *Matter of Bloom v Clyne,*69 AD2d 956 [3d Dept 1979].)

We note that the trial court and the parties have agreed that further motions addressed to the indictment may be made in that court, should the indictment survive this application. Thus, the issue may be preserved for appellate review. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Bloom, Kassal, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 37142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14909]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-952-000.
    Applicants: Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing Cove Point--2021 Penalty Revenue 
Distribution.
    Filed Date: 7/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210702-5006.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/14/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-953-000.
    Applicants: Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing EGTS--2021 Overrun and Penalty 
Revenue Distribution.
    Filed Date: 7/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210702-5007.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/14/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-954-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt 
(Marathon 51754 to Spire 54176) to be effective 7/2/2021.
    Filed Date: 7/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210702-5088.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/14/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-955-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 20210702 Negotiated Rate to be 
effective 7/2/2021.
    Filed Date: 7/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210702-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/14/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 7, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14909 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Emilio Coello, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered January 14,1983, convicting him of attempted aggravated assault upon a police officer, criminal possession of a *867weapon in the second degree (five counts), robbery in the first degree (two counts), and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Our review of the record establishes that the People proved beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant intended to injure a police officer. The police officer’s unimpeached testimony established that defendant aimed the gun and fired at him, not at a police dog. The jury clearly chose to credit this testimony and we find no reason in the record to disturb the jury’s determination.

Moreover, we hold that the Westchester County Court properly exercised jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to CPL 20.40 (4) (c).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining claims and find that they lack merit. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AVATEX CORPORATION FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,500
<SECURITIES>                                     7,828
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                        47
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,142
<PP&E>                                             172
<DEPRECIATION>                                     102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,751
<BONDS>                                         20,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           196
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,106
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,791)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    344
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,447)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

** **

**RFS PARTNERSHIP, L.P. ANDSUBSIDIARIES**

 

SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT

 

The following is a list of the subsidiariesof the registrant and the state of incorporation for each:

 

| **Name of Subsidiaries**                              |   | **State of  Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                                                  |   |                        |
| CNL Rose SPE Tenant Corp.                             |   | Delaware                    |
| RFS Partnership, LP                                   |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS 2002 Financing, Inc.                              |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Financing 2002, LLC                               |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Financing Corp.                                   |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Financing Partnership  II, LP                     |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Financing Partnership,  LP                        |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Leasing II, Inc.                                  |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Leasing III, Inc.                                 |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Leasing IV, Inc.                                  |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Leasing V, Inc.                                   |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Leasing VI, Inc.                                  |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Leasing VII, Inc.                                 |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS MMM 1 1998                                        |   | Virginia                    |
| RFS MMM 1 2000                                        |   | Virginia                    |
| RFS MMM 2 1998                                        |   | Virginia                    |
| RFS MMM 2 2000                                        |   | Virginia                    |
| RFS SPE 1 1998 LLC                                    |   | Virginia                    |
| RFS SPE 1 2000 LLC                                    |   | Virginia                    |
| RFS SPE 2 1998 LLC                                    |   | Virginia                    |
| RFS SPE 2 2000 LLC                                    |   | Virginia                    |
| RFS TRS Holdings, Inc.                                |   | Tennessee                   |
| RFS Wharf Property  Corporation                       |   | Tennessee                   |
| Ridge Lake General Partner,  Inc. (DISABLED 01/23/04) |   | Tennessee                   |
| Rose Mezzanine SPE, GP                                |   | Delaware                    |
| Rose Mezzanine SPE, LP                                |   | Delaware                    |
| Rose SPE 1 GP, LLC                                    |   | Delaware                    |
| Rose SPE 1, LP                                        |   | Delaware                    |
| Wharf Associates                                      |   | California                  |

 

----
# EUR-Lex - 32008M5398 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32008M5398

**Commission Decision of 17/12/2008 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5398 - HUTCHISON / EVERGREEN) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

Brussels, 21.01.2009

SG-Greffe (2009) D/229

C(2009) 435

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5420 – Kyocera Mita/ Triumph-Adler

Notification of 08.12.2008 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 322, 17.12.2008, p. 24

(1) On 08 December 2008, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation 139/2004 (the “Merger Regulation”) by which the undertakings Kyocera Mita Corporation ("KMC", Japan) wholly owned by publicly quoted Kyocera Corporation ("KC", Japan) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of publicly quoted TA Triumph-Adler AG ("TA", Germany) by way of public bid announced on 18/11/2008.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for KMC: production and distribution of office automation products and related services

- for TA: distribution of office automation products and related services.

(2) After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2].

(3) For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

For the Commission

(signed)

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32.

--------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the class III gaming compact between the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community of Minnesota (Tribe) and the State of Minnesota (State).

# DATES:

The compact takes effect on July 2, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240,                         *paula.hart@bia.gov,*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Compact allows for the express and limited purpose of permitting the use of partitioned hard drives by the Community. The Compact is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2021-14218 Filed 7-1-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 776 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 8, 2011 

Mr. WARNER (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, and Mr. WEBB) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ret5 roactive Pay Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED FEDERAL EM7 PLOYEES. 

8 Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

9 in appropriations which begins on or about April 9, 2011, 

10 shall be compensated at their standard rate of compensaVerDate Mar 15 2010 20:11 Apr 12, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S776.IS S776

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 776 IS

1 tion, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, as soon 

2 as practicable after such lapse in appropriations ends. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS