alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

 

I, Joel Boyarski, the Principal Financial Officer ofWorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of WorldGate Communications,Inc., for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, which this certificationaccompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and informationcontained in the March 31, 2006 Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of WorldGateCommunications, Inc.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to WorldGate and will be retained by WorldGateand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 
| Dated: May 10, 2006 |   | /s/  JOEL BOYARSKI                            |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Joel  Boyarski                                |
|                |   | Chief  Financial Officer                      |
|                |   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Office of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture (the Secretary) is providing notice of an increase in the fiscal year (FY) 2021 specialty sugar tariff-rate quota (TRQ) of 40,000 metric tons raw value (MTRV).

# DATES:

This notice is applicable on July 9, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Souleymane Diaby, Multilateral Affairs Division, Trade Policy and Geographic Affairs, Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 1070, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-1070; by telephone (202) 720-2916; or by email                         *Souleymane.Diaby@usda.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On July 9, 2020, USDA announced the establishment of the in-quota quantity of the FY 2021 refined sugar TRQ at 162,000 MTRV for which the sucrose content, by weight in the dry state, must have a polarimeter reading of 99.5 degrees or more (85 FR 41226, July 9, 2020). This amount included the minimum level to which the United States is committed under the WTO Uruguay Round Agreements (22,000 MTRV of which 1,656 MTRV is reserved for specialty sugar) and an additional 140,000 MTRV reserved for specialty sugars. Pursuant to Additional U.S. Note 5 to Chapter 17 of the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) and Section 359k of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, the Secretary today increased the overall FY 2021 refined sugar TRQ by 40,000 MTRV to 202,000 MTRV. The increased amount is reserved for specialty sugar. Entry of this sugar will be permitted beginning July 21, 2021. The sugar entered under this tariff-rate quota is reserved for organic sugar and other specialty sugars not currently produced commercially in the United States or reasonably available from domestic sources.

Jason Hafemeister,

Acting Deputy Under Secretary, Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2021-14726 Filed 7-7-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 3410-10-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




Written
      Statement of Principal Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory J. Wessling,
      Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of December 31, 2005 and results of operations for
      the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company and its
      subsidiaries.






/s/
      Gregory J. Wessling


___________________________


Gregory
      J. Wessling


Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
      Officer)





March
      31,
      2006





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### GOODFELLOW, Respondent, v. UNITED STATES HEALTH & ACCIDENT INS. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 20, 1907.)

Action by Henry Goodfellow against the United States Health & Accident Insurance Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 188/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 188 |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6510 ta' Mejju 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 188

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6510 ta' Mejju 2022

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | Rettifika |
| | Rettifika għas-Sommarju tad-Deċiżjonijiet tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea dwar l-awtorizzazzjonijiet għat-tqegħid fis-suq għall-użu u/jew għall-użu tas-sustanzi elenkati fl-Anness XIV tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1907/2006 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-reġistrazzjoni, il-valutazzjoni, l-awtorizzazzjoni u r-restrizzjoni ta’ sustanzi kimiċi (REACH) (Ippubblikat skont l-Artikolu 64(9) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1907/2006) ( ĠU C 131, 24.3.2022 ) | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

Rettifika

Rettifika għas-Sommarju tad-Deċiżjonijiet tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea dwar l-awtorizzazzjonijiet għat-tqegħid fis-suq għall-użu u/jew għall-użu tas-sustanzi elenkati fl-Anness XIV tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1907/2006 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-reġistrazzjoni, il-valutazzjoni, l-awtorizzazzjoni u r-restrizzjoni ta’ sustanzi kimiċi (REACH) (Ippubblikat skont l-Artikolu 64(9) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1907/2006) ( ĠU C 131, 24.3.2022 )

( ĠU C 131, 24.3.2022 )

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

Rettifika

| 10.5.2022 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 188/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 188/1

---

Rettifika għas-Sommarju tad-Deċiżjonijiet tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea dwar l-awtorizzazzjonijiet għat-tqegħid fis-suq għall-użu u/jew għall-użu tas-sustanzi elenkati fl-Anness XIV tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1907/2006 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-reġistrazzjoni, il-valutazzjoni, l-awtorizzazzjoni u r-restrizzjoni ta’ sustanzi kimiċi (REACH) (Ippubblikat skont l-Artikolu 64(9) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 1907/2006)

(
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea C 131 tal-24 ta’ Marzu 2022
  )

(2022/C 188/01)

F’paġna 5, fit-tieni kolonna tat-tabella,

minflok:

“is-27 ta’ Marzu 2022”,

aqra:

“is-17 ta’ Marzu 2022”.

---
EX-10.2.3



 Exhibit 10.2.3 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY CELLECTIS S.A.—CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE
COMMISSION. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT NO. C-00061906 

BETWEEN: 
 L’Institut Pasteur, a public
interest foundation, 25, rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, represented by Mr. Jean Castex, adjunct General Manager for administration and finance, 

Hereafter referred to as “IP” or the “Licensor”, 

Party of the first part, 
 AND: 

CELLECTIS, CELLECTIS 
 Public limited company with capital
with a capital of 122,363.47 euros, 
 with its registered office at 102, route de Noisy, 93235 Romainville cedex, 

represented by Mr. André Choulika, acting in the capacity of CEO 

Hereafter referred to as “CELLECTIS” or the “LICENSEE”, 

Party of the second part. 
 The LICENSOR and LICENSEE are
hereafter referred to as the “Parties”. 
 RECITALS: 

IP owns patents and patent applications relating to a method of homologous recombination. 

On June 19, 2000, the Parties signed license agreement no. C-00061906 (hereafter the “AGREEMENT”), by which the LICENSOR grants the LICENSEE
exploitation rights to the above mentioned patents and patent applications. 
 The AGREEMENT was the subject of a first amendment signed on
September 8, 2003 and a second amendment dated June 24, 2004 modifying the FIELD of the AGREEMENT. 
 After discussions and exchanges between the
Parties, they have decided to modify the provisions of the AGREEMENT. 
 It is thus agreed as follows: 

ARTICLE 1 
  

	1.1	The Parties agree that the words defined in Article 1, “DEFINITIONS”, of the AGREEMENT, as they are used in this amendment, have the same definitions as in the AGREEMENT and form an integral part of this
amendment. 








 ARTICLE 2 

Article 1.3 of the AGREEMENT is modified by the following provisions, which supersede all previous provisions of the same article: 

1.2 FIELD 
 FIELD of the
AGREEMENT covers the field of homologous recombination applied to all genes other than those that code for Erythropoietin (EPO). 
 ARTICLE 3

 Article 2.1 of the AGREEMENT is modified by the following provisions, which supersede all previous provisions of the same article: 

2.1 The LICENSOR grants, under the terms and conditions specified herein, to the LICENSEE, who accepts this, an exclusive license for the
AGREEMENT PATENTS under the AGREEMENT to make, have made, use and sell the LICENSED PRODUCTS and/or implement or have implemented the LICENSED PROCESSES in the TERRITORY within the FIELD during the term of this AGREEMENT. 

ARTICLE 4 
 Under this Amendment, the LICENSEE will
pay the LICENSOR, 60 days from the date of signature of this Amendment, a fixed, non-refundable and non-deductible payment of [***]. 
 ARTICLE 5

 This Amendment will enter into force on the date of its signature. 

The AGREEMENT’s other provisions remain unchanged and in force between the Parties. 

Signed in Paris on            [Handwritten text: August 24, 2005] 

in 2 original copies. 
  

			
	CELLECTIS		INSTITUT PASTEUR

  
 [***] CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL REDACTED AND SEPARATELY
FILED WITH THE COMMISSION.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 37197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: July 14, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
July 8, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 710 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-107, CP2021-
109.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-14999 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### In the Matter of WILLIAM W. RICH, an attorney at law.

Eor the order: *Mr. George Warren.*

Eor the respondent: *Mr. Franlc 8. Katzenbach, III.*

June 6, 1960.

Name of respondent stricken from roll of attorneys at law. Opinion reported at 33 *N. J.*74.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MATTHEW ROBERT DREIBELBIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 430 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1258

CALVIN J. WEBER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 99-1259

CALVIN J. WEBER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES ARMY PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE FACILITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-98-

2375-AMD, CA-98-3907-AMD)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999
2

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin J. Weber, Appellant Pro Se. Tamera Lynn Fine, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Weber appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the Appellees. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Weber

v. United States Dep’t of the Army, Nos. CA-98-2375-AMD; CA-98-

3907-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Little Goldie G. Diggs, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 857]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joseph D. Valentino, J.), rendered August 24, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by reducing the conviction of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [7]) to assault in the third degree (§ 120.00 [1]) and vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for sentencing on the conviction of assault in the third degree *(see People v Skinner,*94 AD3d 1516 [2012]). Present — Smith, J.P., Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
# C_2019280EN.01002301.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 May 2019 — GE v Société Air France

(Case C-370/19)

(2019/C 280/30)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: GE

Defendant: Société Air France

Question referred

Does a trade union organised strike by the staff of an operating air carrier constitute an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1)

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                  H.J. HEINZ FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     Following are the subsidiaries of H.J. Heinz Finance Company (the
"Company"), other than those which if considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary would not constitute a significant subsidiary, and the state or
country in which each subsidiary was incorporated or organized. The accounts of
each of the listed subsidiaries are a part of the Company's consolidated and
combined financial statements.

<Table>
<Caption>
                         SUBSIDIARY                           STATE OR COUNTRY
                         ----------                           ----------------
<S>                                                           <C>
H.J. Heinz Company, L.P. ...................................      Delaware
</Table>
[No. 39458-4-I.

Division One.

October 20, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Donald Brown, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-03089-5, Richard M. Ishikawa, J., entered October 2, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.2




               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Weston Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
"Report"), I, Isaacs K. Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 12, 2005

By:/s/ Isaacs K. Li
----------------------
Isaacs K. Li, CFO
(principal accounting officer)
Exhibit
32.1




Certification Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, George E. Daddis Jr., the Principal
Executive Officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q/A of WorldGate
Communications, Inc., for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, which
this certification accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of WorldGate Communications, Inc.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WorldGate and will be
retained by WorldGate and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





Dated:  March
      31, 2010
            
            /s/  George
      E. Daddis Jr.George
      E. Daddis Jr.Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### WRIGHT, Respondent, v. NASSAU ELECTRIC R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 15, 1898.)

Action by George Wright against the Nassau Electric Railroad Company.

No opinion. Cause settled after argument, by stipulation between the parties.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 11.1

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended
                                         April 30,                April 30,
                                      ------------------     ------------------
                                         1997       1998        1997       1998
                                      --------    ------     -------     ------
<S>                                <C>        <C>          <C>        <C>      
NUMERATOR:
  Net Income                        $129,420   $132,373     $675,235   $821,080

Denominator:
 Demonimator for basic earnings
 Per share-weighted-average shares 4,000,000  5,100,000    4,000,000  5,100,000
Effect of diluted securities:
 Employee stock options               50,150    693,811       50,150    693,811
 Warrants                               -        57,143          -       57,143
                                   ---------   --------     --------   --------
Dilutive potental common shares       50,150    750,954       50,150    750,954
 Denominator for diluted earnings
   Per share-adjusted,
   Weighted-average shares and
   Assumed conversions             4,050,150  5,850,954     4,050,150 5,850,954
                                  ---------   --------     ---------  ---------
Basic earnings per share             $0.03       $0.03         $0.16      $0.16
                                  ---------   --------     ---------  ---------
Diluted earnings per share           $0.03       $0.02         $0.16      $0.14
                                  ---------   ---------    ---------   --------
                                  ---------   ---------    ---------   --------
</TABLE>