36252 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices 

17See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5. 

18 In the investigation, we found that Zhejiang 

Jingu was cross-owned with An Gang Jingu 

(Hangzhou) Metal Materials Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou 

Jingu New Energy Development Co. Ltd.; 

Shangdong Jingu Auto Parts Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang 

Jingu Automobile Components; Zhejiang Wheel 

World Co., Ltd.; and Shanghai Yata Industry 

Company Limited. There is no information on the 

record of this administrative review that would lead 

Commerce to reconsider that determination, 

therefore, we preliminarily continue to find these 

companies cross-owned. 

19 Id. 

20See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 

21See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

22See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 29615 (May 18, 2020); 

and Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

rate. For further information, see ‘‘Use 

of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences’’ in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.17

Preliminary Results of Review 

Company 

Net 

subsidy 

rate ad 

valoreum 

(percent) 

Zhejiang Jingu Company Limited 

and Shanghai Yata Industry 

Company Limited 18 ................ 388.31 

Xiamen Topu Imports & Export 

Co., Ltd ................................... 388.31 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce discloses to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with the 

preliminary results of a review within 

ten days of its public announcement, or 

if there is no public announcement, 

within five days of the date of 

publication of the notice of preliminary 

results in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

However, because Commerce 

preliminarily applied AFA to the three 

companies that remain in the 

administrative review, in accordance 

with section 776 of the Act, and because 

our calculation of the AFA subsidy rate 

is outlined in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum,19 there are no further 

calculations to disclose. 

Public Comment 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of these preliminary 

results of review.20 Rebuttals to case 

briefs may be filed no later than seven 

days after the case briefs are filed, and 

all rebuttal comments must be limited to 

comments raised in the case briefs.21

Note that Commerce has temporarily 

modified certain of its requirements for 

serving documents containing business 

proprietary information until further 

notice.22

Assessment Rates 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily 

assigned subsidy rates in the amounts 

shown above for the companies shown 

above. Upon completion of the 

administrative review, consistent with 

section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(2) Commerce shall 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. For the 

companies for which this review is 

rescinded, Commerce will instruct CBP 

to assess countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries at a rate equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated countervailing 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, during the period 

February 25, 2019 through December 31, 

2019, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(l)(i). 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce intends, upon 

publication of the final results, to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown for each of the 

respective companies listed above on 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to 

continue to collect cash deposits at the 

most recent company-specific or allothers rate applicable to the company. 

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results are issued 

and published pursuant to sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 1, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, 

In Part 

IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

V. Scope of the Order 

VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Application of Adverse Inferences 

a. Legal Standard 

b. Application of AFA to the GOC and 

Non-Responsive Mandatory Respondents 

Shanghai Yata Xiamen Topu, and 

Zhejiang Jingu 

c. Selection of the AFA Rates 

VII. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2021–14638 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–020, C–570–021] 

Melamine From the People’s Republic 

of China: Continuation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) and the International Trade 

Commission (ITC) have determined that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) 

orders on melamine from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping, net countervailable subsidies, 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States. Therefore, Commerce is 

publishing a notice of continuation of 

these AD and CVD orders. 

DATES: Applicable July 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin A. Smith, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2181. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 28, 2015, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD and CVD orders on melamine from 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices 36253 

1See Melamine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 80 FR 80751 (December 28, 2015) (Orders). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 

85 FR 69585 (November 3, 2020). 

3See Cornerstone’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review Of Countervailing Duty Order On Melamine 

from the People’s Republic Of China: Domestic 

Interested Party Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ 

dated November 10, 2020; see also Cornerstone’s 

Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of 

Antidumping Duty Order On Melamine from the 

People’s Republic Of China: Domestic Interested 

Party Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated 

November 10, 2020. 

4See Cornerstone’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review Of Countervailing Duty Order On Melamine 

from the People’s Republic Of China: Domestic 

Interested Party Substantive Response,’’ dated 

November 25, 2020; see also Cornerstone’s Letter, 

‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of Antidumping Duty 

Order On Melamine from the People’s Republic Of 

China: Domestic Interested Party Substantive 

Response,’’ dated November 25, 2020. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews for 

November 2020,’’ dated December 23, 2020. 

6See Melamine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of the Expedited Five-Year 

Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 86 

FR 11501 (February 25, 2021); see also Melamine 

from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of the Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 13528 (March 9, 

2021). 7See Melamine from China, 86 FR 35531 (July 6, 

2021). 8Melamine is also known as 2,4,6-triamino-striazine; 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine; 

Cyanurotriamide; Cyanurotriamine; Cyanuramide; 

and by various brand names. 

China.1 On November 3, 2020, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the first sunset review of 

the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 On November 10, 2020, 

Commerce received notices of intent to 

participate from Cornerstone Chemical 

Company (Cornerstone, or domestic 

interested party), within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3

Cornerstone claimed interested party 

status under section 771(9)(C) of the 

Act, as a domestic producer engaged in 

the production of melamine in the 

United States. 

On November 25, 2020, Commerce 

received substantive responses from the 

domestic interested party within the 30- 

day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no 

substantive responses from any other 

domestic or interested parties and no 

hearing was requested. 

On December 23, 2020, Commerce 

notified the ITC that it did not receive 

adequate substantive responses from 

respondent interested parties.5 As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted expedited (120-day) sunset 

reviews of these Orders. 

As a result of its reviews, Commerce 

determined that revocation of the AD 

and CVD orders on melamine from 

China would likely lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping and 

subsidization. Therefore, Commerce 

notified the ITC of the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail should the 

orders be revoked, pursuant to sections 

751(c)(1) and 752(b) and (c) of the Act.6

On July 6, 2021, the ITC published its 

determinations, pursuant to sections 

751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that 

revocation of the Orders would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time.7

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise subject to the 

Orders is melamine (Chemical Abstracts 

Service (CAS) registry number 108–78– 

01, molecular formula C3H6N6).8

Melamine is a crystalline powder or 

granule typically (but not exclusively) 

used to manufacture melamine 

formaldehyde resins. All melamine is 

covered by the scope of these Orders 

irrespective of purity, particle size, or 

physical form. Melamine that has been 

blended with other products is included 

within this scope when such blends 

include constituent parts that have been 

intermingled, but that have not been 

chemically reacted with each other to 

produce a different product. For such 

blends, only the melamine component 

of the mixture is covered by the scope 

of these Orders. Melamine that is 

otherwise subject to these orders is not 

excluded when commingled with 

melamine from sources not subject to 

these Orders. Only the subject 

component of such commingled 

products is covered by the scope of 

these Orders. 

The subject merchandise is provided 

for in subheading 2933.61.0000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheading and CAS registry 

number are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope is dispositive. 

Continuation of the Orders 

As a result of the determinations by 

Commerce and the ITC that revocation 

of the Orders would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping, 

countervailable subsidies, and material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), 

Commerce hereby orders the 

continuation of the AD and CVD orders 

on melamine from China. U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection will continue to 

collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the 

rates in effect at the time of entry for all 

imports of subject merchandise. 

The effective date of continuation of 

these Orders will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce 

intends to initiate the next five-year 

reviews of the Orders not later than 30 

days prior to the fifth anniversary of the 

effective date of continuation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These five-year (sunset) reviews and 

this notice are in accordance with 

sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act 

and published in accordance with 

section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: July 6, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–14640 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020 Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that Heze Huayi 

Chemical Co., Ltd. (Heze Huayi) and 

Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. 

(Kangtai) did not have any shipments of 

subject merchandise during the period 

of review (POR) June 1, 2019, through 

May 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable July 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 8, 2021, Commerce 

published its Preliminary Results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on chlorinated 

isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from 

China covering the period June 1, 2019, 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES