alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.7

                                  CERTIFICATION

                          Chase Credit Card Owner Trust
                           Series 2002-1 (the "Trust")

I, Patricia M. Garvey, a vice president in charge of the reports of the
servicing function of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association for the
above-referenced Trust, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, for inclusion in
         these reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
         under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon
         my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, and except as
         disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
         under the pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement; and

5.       The report disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, that is included
         in this annual report.





Date:    March 30, 2004


/s/ Patricia M. Garvey
-----------------------------
Name:    Patricia M. Garvey
Title:   Vice President
Company: Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
Exhibit 31.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

         I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Royal & Sun Alliance Bond-Backed Series 2002-2 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
          servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
          provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
          under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion
          in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
          based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
          Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 27, 2006


       /s/ DAVID J. KOLIBACHUK
-----------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of AspenBio Pharma, Inc. (the “Registrant”); |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|          |                                                                |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| April 9, 2012 |                                                                |
|          | /s/ Stephen T. Lundy                                                |
|          | Stephen T. Lundy,Chief Executive OfficerPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
|          |                                                                |

----
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                    |  |             
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Subsidiary                          |  | Jurisdiction
|                                    | 
|Meru Networks International, Inc.   |  | Delaware    
|                                    | 
|Meru Networks India Private Limited |  | India       
|                                    | 
|Meru Networks K.K.                  |  | Japan       
|                                    | 
|Meru Networks B.V.                  |  | Netherlands 
|                                    | 
|Meru Networks Pty. Ltd.             |  | Australia
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

RICHARD ALLEN HIGHTOWER, No. 83369 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

FILED 

DEC 0 3 2021 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction. Third Judicial 

District Court, Lyon County; Leon Aberasturi, Judge. 

Appellant's counsel has filed a notice of withdrawal of this 

appeal. Counsel advises this court that she has informed appellant of the 

legal effects and consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal. 

Having been so informed. appellant consents to a voluntary dismissal of this 

appeal. Cause appearing, this court 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1 

, J. 

'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the 

one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under 

NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order. 

,40 , J 

Stiglich Silver 

arraguirre 

A. BROWN 

PREME OURT 

DEPUTY CLERK 
cc: Hon. Leon Aberasturi, District Judge 

Walther Law Offices, PLLC 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Lyon County District Attorney 

Third District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0)1947A 448#1. 2
#### CAPASSO v. WOOLFOLK et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 18, 1898.)

Action by Arcangelo Capasso against Edward G. Woolfolk and another.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. See 49 N. Y. Supp. 409.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Amy E. Miles, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Regal Entertainment Group;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Date: March 11, 2009

/s/ AMY E. MILES Amy E. Miles Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CONSENT OF NATIONAL CINEMEDIA, LLC**

 

Board of Directors Regal Entertainment Group 7132 Regal Lane Knoxville, TN 37918

 

Members of the Board:

 

We hereby consent to the use by Regal Entertainment Group (the “Company”) of the audited financial statements of National CineMedia, LLC as of and for the year ended December 26, 2013 (and comparative periods) appearing in the Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2013 filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendment thereto.

 
|   | National   CineMedia, LLC                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By   National CineMedia, Inc., its managing member |
|   |                                                    |
|   | By:                                                     | /s/ RALPH   E. HARDY |
|   |                                                    | Ralph   E. Hardy |
|   |                                                    | *Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary* |
|   |                                                    | March 14,   2014 |

 

----
#### THOMPSON, Appellant, v. NEW ACADEMY THEATER CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 13, 1912.)

Action by George H. Thompson against the New Academy Theater Company. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See, also, 133 N. Y. Supp. 1146.
**Exhibit 32 (ii)**

 

CERTIFICATION SECTION 1350

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianL. Knepp, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Brian L. Knepp      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Brian  L. Knepp          |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |
|                     |   |
| May 10, 2010        |   |

 

1

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOEY DESHAUN CLARK,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10089

D.C. No. 2:07-CR-00077-PMP

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Joey Deshaun Clark appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month

sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

FILED

APR 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10089

§§ 922(g)(1) & 924(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Clark’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. Clark’s letter, received on March

10, 2010, is deemed filed. We construe the letter as a pro se supplemental brief. 

No answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




To
      the
      Board of Directors


Optigenex,
      Inc.




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation of our report dated, April 13, 2007 included in
      this 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, on the financial statements of
      Optigenex, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and for the year then ended, into the
      Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
      333-133942).





/s/
      Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP




**GOLDSTEIN
      GOLUB KESSLER LLP**


New
      York,
      New York




May
      14,
      2008
#### BIEBER, Appellant, v. GOLDBERG, Respondent, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Gerson Bieber against Lewis Goldberg, impleaded with others.

PER CURIAM.

Order of the County Court of Kings county, granting leave to amend complaint, modified by striking out the imposition of $100 as terms of the amendment, and, as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Appeal from order refusing to resettle dismissed, without costs. See 104 N. Y. Supp. 1080. _
#### HOWART CROSS, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. ROBERT E. LAMB, INC., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER, AND TRUSKEY INDUSTRIAL PIPE FITTERS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 60 *N. J. Super.*53.

*Messrs. Brown, Connery, Kulp & Witte*for the plaintiff-petitioner.

*Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos*for the defendant-petitioner.

*Messrs. Kisselman, Devine & Deighan*for the defendant-respondent.

May 4, 1960.

Denied.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research: Wenatchee, WA
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Pacific West Area Wenatchee, Washington Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   Visit the USDA-ARS NEWS Website!   ARS News Articles  Pampering Anjou Pears: ARS Studies Explore Storage IdeasJan 30, 2014USDA's Agricultural Research Service Announces Scientist of the Year and Other AwardsJun 11, 2013ARS-Studied Gas Helps Apples Stay CrispOct 17, 2007


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Earl W. Abbott, Chief Executive Officer,
President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Principal Executive Officer and George
Drazenovic, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of Tornado Gold International Corporation, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Tornado Gold
      International Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Tornado Gold International
Corporation.                                                                  

Dated: April 17, 2007

/s/ Earl W.
AbbottEarl W. Abbott, Chief Executive Officer, President,
Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ George DrazenovicGeorge Drazenovic Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tornado Gold
International Corporation and will be retained by Tornado Gold International
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
#### John Schiavone et al., Appellants, v Bayside Fuel Oil Depot Corporation et al., Respondents.

[942 NYS2d 585]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated August 11, 2010, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

*971Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

On March 25, 2006, the plaintiff John Schiavone allegedly was injured when he slipped and fell while alighting from his truck in the defendants’ gravel parking lot on Sackett Street in Brooklyn. Schiavone and his wife, suing derivatively, commenced this action, alleging that the parking lot’s surface was defective. At his deposition, Schiavone testified that he parked his truck in the lot at the end of each work day. He was looking at the ground just before he allegedly was injured, and did not see anything other than the gravel. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending, among other things, that the condition that allegedly caused the accident was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous. The Supreme Court granted the motion, and the plaintiffs appeal.

A landowner has a duty to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe condition *(see Basso v Miller,*40 NY2d 233, 241 [1976]), but has no duty to protect against or warn about open and obvious conditions that are not inherently dangerous *(see Dadon v 102-30 66th Rd. Co-Op Owner’s, Inc.,*90 AD3d 976, 977 [2011]; *Atehortua v Lewin,*90 AD3d 794, 794-795 [2011]; *Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48, 52 [2003]). Here, the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that the surface of the parking lot was an open and obvious condition and that it was not inherently dangerous *(see Atehortua v Lewin,*90 AD3d at 795; Weiss *v Half Hollow Hills Cent. School Dist.,*70 AD3d 932, 933 [2010]; *Fernandez v Edlund,*31 AD3d 601 [2006]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Atehortua v Lewin,*90 AD3d at 794-795; *Fernandez v Edlund,*31 AD3d 601 [2006]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Balkin, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.
#### Barbera C. Tode, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estates of Timothy Casey and Another, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Judgment of the Court of Claims (Lengyel, J.), dated September 20, 1983, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. *{Weiss v Fote,*7 NY2d 579, *rearg denied*8 NY2d 934; *Russell v State of New York,*75 AD2d 907, *affd*53 NY2d 986.) Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.
#### WINSHIP, Respondent, v. BUFFALO, R. & P. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

February 6, 1898.)

Action by Martha Winship, as administratrix, etc., against the Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except ADAMS, J., dissenting, on the ground that there is no proof of the absence of contributory negligence.
#### Raymond Shearer et al., Respondents, v Daniel R. Mooney et al., Appellants.

— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: A cause of action for loss of services and society of a spouse is predicated upon physical or mental injury or incapacity of that spouse *(see, Millington v Southeastern Elevator Co.,*22 NY2d 498, 504; 15 NY Jur, Domestic Relations, § 302 [rev ed]; Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 125, at 932 [5th ed 1984]; Restatement [Second] of Torts § 693 [1977]). In this legal malpractice action there is no allegation of physical or mental injury or incapacity inflicted upon either spouse; hence, Special Term should not have granted permission to amend the complaint to add the cause of action for loss of consortium. (Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — amend complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer and O’Donnell, JJ.