alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 538 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 538

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 
                                the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2011

  Mr. Cardin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 
                                the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION 
              ACT.

    Section 10 of the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 6109) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 10. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2012 
through 2017.
    ``(b) Use of Funds.--Of the amounts made available under subsection 
(a) for each fiscal year, not less than 75 percent shall be expended 
for projects carried out at a location outside of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant Genetic Resources Unit (PGRU): Geneva, NY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Diversity Collections
                        Apple
                                    Brassica
                                    Buckwheat
                                    Celery
                                    Grape
                                    Hemp
                                    Onion
                                    Radish
                                    Squash
                                    Tart Cherry
                                    Tomato
                                    Other Seed CropsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Apple Collectionheadline bar Apple Collection
               Apple Impact
               Apple Seed Germination
               Apple Accession List


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Minera Andes Inc. (the Corporation), on Form 10-Q for the six month period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, William V. Schara, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                   |  |     |  |                       |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | MINERA ANDES INC.
|                      |  |                   | 
|Date: August 18, 2006 |  |                   |  | By: |  | /s/ William V. Schara
|                      |  |                   |  |     |  |                       |  | William V. Schara      
|                      |  |                   |  |     |  |                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### SWANSON GROUP MFG. LLC, et al., Appellees Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, et al., Appellants v. Kenneth Lee SALAZAR, Secretary of Interior and Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture, Appellees.

No. 11-5236.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 14, 2011.

*573Mark C. Rutzick, Mark C. Rutzick, Inc., Oak Hill, VA, for Swanson Group Mfg. LLC, et al.

Kristen Lee Boyles, Patti Ann Goldman, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.

Robert Evans Kopp, Brian Christopher Toth, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of Interior and Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture.

BEFORE: GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges, and GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief of appellants. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 340). Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s July 19, 2011 order be reversed and the case be remanded with directions to grant appellants’ motion to intervene as of right with respect to the first claim for relief in the amended complaint. “[W]here (as here) the district court has not accompanied its decision with either factual findings or explanation,” we review *de novo*the denial of a motion to intervene as of right. *Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Norton,*322 F.3d 728, 732 (D.C.Cir.2003). Appellants have demonstrated that they meet the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a). *See Karsner v. Lothian,*532 F.3d 876, 885 (D.C.Cir.2008); *Fund for Animals,*322 F.3d at 731. Upon remand, the district court may consider in the first instance the government’s request that the intervenors “be subject to the same constraints applicable to parties in any Administrative Procedure Act ... case,” and that intervenors “be allocated their own page limits and argument time limits,” if applicable. Federal Defendants’ Response to Motion to Intervene at 2.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
25th
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs Safety, Health and Environmental Training







NAA Emergency Procedureheadline bar HOME


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Auditors
--------------------------------


James Stafford
Chartered Accountants*
Suite 350 - 1111 Melville Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada V6E 3V6
Telephone +1 604 669 0711
Facsimile +1 604 669 0754
* Incorporated professional





        Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation of our report dated 8 March 2006, with respect
to the balance sheet of Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd. as at 31 December
2005, and the related statements of operations, cash flows and changes in
stockholders' equity for the year then ended and for the period from the date
of inception on 6 March 2000 to 31 December 2005 in the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.

/s/ James Stafford
Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
31 March 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 441 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 441

For the relief of Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian Arreola, 
             Nayely Arreola Carlos, and Cindy Jael Arreola.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2011

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
For the relief of Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian Arreola, 
             Nayely Arreola Carlos, and Cindy Jael Arreola.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any 
order, for the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian 
Arreola, Nayely Arreola Carlos, and Cindy Jael Arreola shall be deemed 
to have been lawfully admitted to, and remained in, the United States, 
and shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255).
    (b) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) shall apply 
only if the applications for issuance of immigrant visas or the 
applications for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees 
not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
immigrant visas to Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian 
Arreola, Nayely Arreola Carlos, and Cindy Jael Arreola, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 4, during the 
current or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of birth of Esidronio 
Arreola-Saucedo, Marina Elna Cobian Arreola, Nayely Arreola Carlos, and 
Cindy Jael Arreola under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
birth of Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian Arreola, Nayely 
Arreola Carlos, and Cindy Jael Arreola under section 202(e) of such Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1152(c)).
    (d) PAYGO.--The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be 
determined by reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary 
Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in 
the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget 
Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 
vote on passage.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The
Board of Directors
Regal Entertainment Group:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-87958) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-108212) on
Form S-3 of Regal Entertainment Group of our report dated February 8, 2002 with respect to the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows of United Artists Theatre
Company for the forty-four weeks ended January 3, 2002 (Reorganized Period) and for the nine weeks ended March 1, 2001 and for the year ended December 28, 2000
(Historical Periods), which report appears in the December 26, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Regal Entertainment Group.

As
described in Note 1 and 2 of the consolidated financial statements, effective March 1, 2001, United Artists Theatre Company emerged from protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code pursuant to a reorganization plan, which was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court on January 22, 2001. In accordance with AICPA statement of Position 90-7, the Company
adopted fresh start reporting whereby its assets, liabilities and new capital structure were adjusted to reflect estimated fair values as of March 1, 2001. As a result, the consolidated
financial statements for the periods subsequent to March 1, 2001 reflect the Reorganized Company's new basis of accounting and are not comparable to the Historical Company's
pre-reorganization consolidated financial statements.

Denver,
Colorado
December 3, 2003



---

QuickLinks
#### Ambac Assurance Corp. et al., Respondents, v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Bank of America Corp., Appellant. MBIA Insurance Corporation, Respondent, v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Bank of America Corp., Appellant. Financial Guaranty Insurance Co., Respondent, v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Bank of America Corp., Appellant. Syncora Guarantee, Inc., Respondent, v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Bank of America Corp., Appellant.

[941 NYS2d 492]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered October 31, 2011 and November 2, 2011, which, among other things, denied defendant Bank of America Corp.’s motions to sever and consolidate plaintiffs’ successor liability claims for purposes of discovery, and held in abeyance defend*456ant’s motion to consolidate the successor liability claims for purposes of trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This is a consolidated appeal involving four related but separate claims by monoline insurers for primary liability against the Countrywide defendants in connection with financial guarantee insurance covering mortgage-backed securities. The actions also involve successor liability against defendant Bank of America. The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to sever plaintiffs’ successor liability claims from the primary claims and to consolidate them, for purposes of discovery, in a single action. The successor liability actions are at completely different stages of discovery, and consolidation would result in undue delay *(see Barnes v Cathers & Dembrosky,*5 AD3d 122 [2004]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Catterson, Renwick and Richter, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Haywood Yates, Appellant, v Wilson Walters, as Superintendent of the Ossining Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

In a habeas corpus proceeding challenging the denial of petitioner’s request for release to parole supervision, petitioner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burchell, J.), entered June 6, 1983, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination dismissing the proceeding.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In August of 1978, petitioner was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 10 to 20 years upon his conviction of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree. The incident which was the basis for the manslaughter conviction was committed by petitioner while he was on parole from a prior robbery conviction. The sentencing court specified that the 1978 sentence was to run concurrently with the prior sentence. As a consequence, petitioner was entitled to credit for prior time served on his 1959 conviction as against the minimum sentence imposed on the 1978 conviction *(see,*Penal Law § 70.30 [1] [a]). Despite Special Term’s statement that petitioner would not serve his minimum term of imprisonment until 1988, the record reflects that the respondent Parole Board has properly recognized the credit for prior time served by petitioner by granting him parole consideration hearings in January 1979, January 1981 and January 1983, and should continue to do so *(see, People ex rel. Maggiore v Reid,*84 AD2d 583, *lv denied*55 NY2d 604).

We further find that the decision of the board members in 1983 to deny petitioner parole because of the serious nature of the offense, petitioner’s extensive criminal record, and prior failures at parole supervision, including the fact that the instant offense was committed while petitioner was on parole, is supported by the record and satisfied the board’s obligations under Executive Law § 259-i *(see, Matter of Ganci v Hammock,*99 AD2d 546; *People ex rel. Herbert v New York State Bd. of Parole,*97 AD2d 128; *appeal withdrawn*62 NY2d 617; *Matter of Marturano v Hammock,*87 AD2d 732, *lv denied*56 NY2d 506; *People ex rel. Maggiore v Reid, supra; Matter of Lynch v New York State Div. of Parole,*82 AD2d 1012). Since the respondent Parole Board acted in accordance with statutory requirements, and *840there has been no “showing of irrationality bordering on impropriety”, judicial review of the decision denying parole is precluded (Ma*tter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77; *see,*Executive Law § 259-i [5]; *Matter of Ganci v Hammock, supra).*Mollen, P. J., Niehoff, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 124 (Thursday, July 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: July 1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 16, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 707 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-103, CP2021-
106.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-14023 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P