# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

May 18, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00049

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.R.F. AND S.W.F., CHILDREN

From the 408th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00061 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant S.F. ’s parental rights. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on April 5, 2021 . On April 5, 2021 , appellant filed a motion requesting a twenty

- day extension of time to file the brief. As a basis for this request, Appellant’s appointed attorney

, Jame s B. Peplinski

, recited the following as a basis for his request:

On February 24, 2021, undersigned counsel was appointed to represent S.F. for purposes of appeal only. The Clerk’s Record was filed on March 4, 2021, and is more than 1,000 pages long. The Reporters Record was filed on March 15, 2021. It is made up of thirteen volumes containing more than 2,500 pages of material. The sheer size of the appellate record in this case is such that undersigned counsel, who was not a party to the underlying trial proceedings, needs additional time to review and properly analyze the entire appellate record in search of viable appellate issues. The extension of time is necessary to provide effective assistance of counsel. Said extension is not sought for purposes of delay.

By order dated April 6, 2021 , appellant’s first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline to file the brief to April 26, 2021 . Because the disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration

, our first order noted this appeal is required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Our order further stated, “Given the time constrain ts governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.”

O n April 26, 2021

, Mr. Peplinski filed a second motion for extension of time requesting an additional twenty

- day extension. Appellant’s second motion stated the exact same grounds for relief recited in appellant’s first motion for extension of time and quoted above . On April 27,2021, this court granted appellant’s second motion for extension of time, stating in no uncertain

terms, “ THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED . Appellant’s brief must be filed no later than May 17, 2021

. ”

On May 17, 2021, Mr. Peplinski filed a third motion for extension of time requesting an additional ten

- day extension until May 27, 2021, in contravention of this court’s statement that no further extensions will be granted . Appellant’s third motion stated the exact same grounds for relief recited in appellant’s first and second motions for extension of time. As previously stated,
t his appeal is required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. It is unacceptable for appellant’s brief t o require fifty of those days . Accordingly, a ppellant’s third motion for extension of time is GRANTED IN PART

.

This court ORDER S Mr. Peplinski, to file appellant’s brief on or before May 21, 2021

. I f appellant’s brief is not filed by May 21, 2021 , an order will be issued directing Mr. Peplinski to appear before this court in person and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file appellant’s brief. The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Mr. Pepl inski by certified mail, return receipt requested, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of May, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court