alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALINA FRANCO and ROLANDO RUBIO , Appellant s ,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 1

- 1394

[ May 5 , 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE20

- 000780

.

Kristin Marrero of The Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, P.A., Davie

, for appellant s

.
Maureen G. Pearcy of Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., Miami

, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

L EVINE , F ORST and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan


### May 27, 2008

136049

DANA McCLUNG, Plaintiff,

v
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/ SC: 136049 AGC: 3276/07 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

p0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
May 27, 2008
Clerk
Exhibit 10.1
                                  ------------



AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
----------------------

COPYTELE, INC. 2003 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN
----------------------------------------


     By  resolution  of the Board of Directors of CopyTele,  Inc. on October 31,
2005,  the Board of Directors  approved  amending the  CopyTele,  Inc 2003 Share
Incentive  Plan (the "Plan") by replacing  Section 5 of the Plan in its entirety
with the following new paragraph:


5.   Common Stock  Available  Under the Plan. The aggregate  number of shares of
Common Stock that may be subject to Benefits,  including Stock Options,  granted
under  this  Plan  shall be  30,000,000  shares of  Common  Stock,  which may be
authorized and unissued or treasury  shares,  subject to any adjustments made in
accordance with Section 18 hereof. Any shares of Common Stock subject to a Stock
Option  or Stock  Appreciation  Right  which  for any  reason  is  cancelled  or
terminated  without having been  exercised,  any shares subject to Stock Awards,
Performance  Awards or Stock Units which are  forfeited,  any shares  subject to
Performance  Awards  settled in cash or any shares  delivered  to the Company as
part or full payment for the  exercise of a Stock  Option or Stock  Appreciation
Right shall again be available for Benefits under the Plan.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000916

09-DEC-2015

08:06 AM
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-21181

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SARAH ELIZABETH BOUNDS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-99-CR-589-1)

-------------------- September 27, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Sarah Elizabeth Bounds appeals her

conviction for making false claims to the United States Government,

through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 287. She argues that the district court erred in

reaching a guilty verdict after a bench trial because the evidence

did not show that she falsely claimed that she owned and resided at

the home that was flooded.

Bounds has waived any argument that the home was not herprincipal place of residence at the time of the flood. S ee United

States v. Fagan

, 821 F.2d 1002, 1015 n.10 (5th Cir. 1987).

Moreover, the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict

because it established that Bounds transferred owne rship of the

home prior to the flood. See United States v. Ferguson , 211 F.3d

878, 882 (5th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Meghan Leanne Garza, * From the 161st District Court

o f Ector County, Texas

Trial Court No. B

- 16

- 0 296

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00148

- CR * December 15 , 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with

this court ’ s opinion, the appe al is dismissed.
#### UNITED STATES of America v. David SANCHEZ, a/k/a Alex a/k/a Alexandro Feliz Trevino David Sanchez, Appellant.

No. 07-4614.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Oct. 30, 2008.

Filed: Jan. 14, 2009.

Christy H. Fawcett, Esq., Theodore B. Smith, III, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Gerald A. Lord, Esq., Miller, Poole & Lord, York, PA, for Appellant.

BEFORE: McKEE, NYGAARD, and SILER,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, David Sanchez, pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute, 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. He was sentenced to 121 months of incarceration. The issue he has raised before us is whether the District Court erred when it added a two-level enhancement to his sentencing calculation because two firearms were found in the Appellant’s residence. The District Court had jurisdiction over Sanchez’ case pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231*798and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). We have subject matter jurisdiction over Sanchez’ appeal, even though he agreed to an appellate waiver in his plea agreement. *United States v. Gwinnett,*483 F.3d 200, 203 (3d Cir.2007). However, we may refuse to exercise that jurisdiction upon a finding that the appellate waiver is valid. *Id.*We make a *de novo*determination as to the validity of Sanchez’ appellate waiver. *United States v. Jackson,*523 F.3d 234, 237 (3d Cir.2008).

We will dismiss the appeal because the record conclusively demonstrates that Appellant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence. We enforce an appeal waiver if such a waiver is entered knowingly and voluntarily, unless enforcement of the waiver would work a miscarriage of justice. The District Court complied with Fed.R.Crim.P. ll(b)(l)(N), which required it to “inform the defendant of, and determine that the defendant understands [ ... ] the terms of any provision in a plea agreement waiving the right to appeal.” As the District Court complied with the Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Appellant has alleged no miscarriage of justice, we will dismiss the appeal.
```

            STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMERICARE HEALTH SCAN,
INC. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, DR.
JOSEPH P. D'ANGELO, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify that

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Dr. Joseph P. D'Angelo
 ---------------------------------
    DR. JOSEPH P. D'ANGELO
    April 15, 2003
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (filed on July 23, 2002) pertaining to the Quantum Fuel Systems
Technologies Worldwide, Inc., 2002 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated July
18, 2002, except for the 1st paragraph of Note 1 as to which the date is July
23, 2002, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Quantum Fuel
Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended April 30, 2002.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Long Beach, California
July 24, 2002
certofamend2.htm


     

    Exhibit 4.8


    CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT

    TO

    AMENDED
AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

    OF

    UNIVERSAL
INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

     

    


    Universal
Insurance Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:

     

    FIRST:   The
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended by deleting paragraph (a) of Article IV of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation in its entirety and substituting therefor the
following:

    


    (a)  The
total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have
the authority to issue is 56,000,000 shares, of which:

    


    (i)          55,000,000
shares shall be designated as Common Stock, having a par value of $.01 per share
(the "Common Stock"); and

    


    (ii)          1,000,000
shares shall be designated as Preferred Stock, having a par value of $.01 per
share.

    


    SECOND:  The
capital of the Corporation will not be reduced under or by reason of this
amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

    


    THIRD:  The
amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation set forth in
this Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted by the vote of the
stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be
signed by its duly authorized officer as of this 18th day of May,
2007.

    


    


    
      	
              UNIVERSAL
      INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
              By:

            	
              /s/ Bradley I. Meier

            
	 
      	
              Bradley
      I. Meier

            
	 
      	
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
Unassociated Document


    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    
      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement under seal effective
the date first written above.

      


      American
Restaurant Concepts, Inc.

      


      /s/  James Robert
Shaw

      


      By: James
Robert Shaw, Secretary

      


      


      /s/ Michael
Rosenberger

      


      Michael
Rosenberger, individually
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth Hicks, President of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Argentex Mining
      Corporation for the year ended January 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Argentex Mining Corporation.                                                                 

Dated: June 2, 2009

| | /s/ Kenneth Hicks            
| | -----------------------------
| | Kenneth Hicks                
| | President                    
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Argentex Mining Corporation  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 128 (Thursday, July 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 36191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses, 
Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.2, that the Research 
Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses (RAC-GWVI) will meet 
by teleconference on August 4, 2021. The open session will convene at 
11:00 a.m. (EST) and end at 4:00 p.m. (EST). The open session will be 
available to the public by connecting to: Webex URL: https://veteransaffairs.webex.com/veteransaffairs/j.php?MTID=mb993599afcb0dbe5e53e60c9e635ca67. Or, Join by phone: 1-404-
397-1596 USA Toll Number or 1-833-558-0712 Toll-free Number; Meeting 
number (access code): 199 041 5097. Meeting password: GWVets1990!
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice and make 
recommendations to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on proposed 
research studies, research plans, and research strategies relating to 
the health consequences of military service in the Southwest Asia 
Theater of operations during the Gulf War in 1990-1991.
    The Committee will review VA program activities related to Gulf War 
Veterans' illnesses and updates on relevant scientific research 
published since the last Committee meeting. This meeting will include 
presentations related to health issues, complications of aging, and 
disorders of the autonomic nervous system, and will engage VA Senior 
Leadership. This meeting will also include Committee discussion of 
Committee business and activities.
    The meeting will include time reserved for public comments 30 
minutes before the meeting closes. Individuals who wish to address the 
Committee may submit a 1-2 page summary of their comments for inclusion 
in the official meeting record. Members of the public may submit 
written statements for the Committee's review or seek additional 
information by contacting Dr. Karen Block, Designated Federal Officer, 
at 202-443-5600, or at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#206b4152454e0e624c4f434b6056410e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7932180b1c17573b15161a12390f18571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 2, 2021.
LaTonya L. Small,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-14603 Filed 7-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[No. 15430-1-III.

Division Three.

August 5, 1997.]

#### Art Mensonides, et al., *Respondents,*v. Jacob Veldhuis, et al., *Petitioners.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 94-2-01303-2, Heather K. Van Nuys, J., entered December 19, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Brown, J.
[No. 20459-2-II.

Division Two.

October 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lavan Arthur Lukes, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 95-1-00284-5, George L. Wood, J., entered January 25, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6657** 

EBER EMANUEL URIAS SANCHEZ , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. KIERAN J. SHANAHAN, Secretary of Prisons; CYNTHIA THRONTON, Administrator; FRANK L. PERRY, Secretary , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 00157

- FDW )

Submitted : September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Eber Emanuel Urias Sanchez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
E ber Emanuel Urias Sanchez seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A ) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by dem onstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sanchez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 36747)    
*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago* (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

1. The application under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 by *First Bancorp of Taylorville, Inc., Taylorville, Illinois,* published on July 7, 2021 in 86 FR 35796 has been withdrawn.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 8, 2021.

Michele Taylor Fennell, 

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-14861 Filed 7-12-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32.1



              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Weston Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
"Report"), I, Yin Sen Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 13, 2005



By:/s/ Yin Sen Wong
----------------------
 Yin Sen Wong, CEO
(principal executive officer)
# L_2009041DE.01003401.xml

| 12.2.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 41/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 41/34

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1099/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 22. Oktober 2008 über die Energiestatistik

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 304 vom 14. November 2008
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 304 vom 14. November 2008

Seite 4, Artikel 6 Absatz 3 Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

| „b) | ‚Genauigkeit‘ bezieht sich auf den Grund der Übereinstimmung der Schätzungen mit den unbekannten wahren Werten;“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

‚Genauigkeit‘ bezieht sich auf den Grund der Übereinstimmung der Schätzungen mit den unbekannten wahren Werten;“

muss es heißen:

| „b) | ‚Genauigkeit‘ bezieht sich auf den Grad der Übereinstimmung der Schätzungen mit den unbekannten wahren Werten;“. |
| --- | --- |

„b)

‚Genauigkeit‘ bezieht sich auf den Grad der Übereinstimmung der Schätzungen mit den unbekannten wahren Werten;“.

---