alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; Mechanism for Time-Sensitive Drug Abuse Research.                    

*Date:*                         July 27, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sheila Pirooznia, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Review, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9350,                         *sheila.pirooznia@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 8, 2021.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-14931 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 231 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 231

    To designate the parcel of land containing the facility of the 
Agricultural Research Service of the Department of Agriculture located 
  at State Highway 26 West in Poplarville, Mississippi, as the ``Thad 
           Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory Site''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

 Mr. Taylor of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, 
Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Pickering) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To designate the parcel of land containing the facility of the 
Agricultural Research Service of the Department of Agriculture located 
  at State Highway 26 West in Poplarville, Mississippi, as the ``Thad 
           Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory Site''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The parcel of land containing the facility of the Agricultural 
Research Service of the Department of Agriculture located at State 
Highway 26 West in Poplarville, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory 
Site''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the parcel referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thad Cochran Southern 
Horticultural Laboratory Site''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-139911 on Form S-3of our report dated March 30, 2007 (October 9, 2007 as to Notes 1, 2, 3, and 8) (which reportincludes explanatory paragraphs regarding the restatement of the 2006 consolidated financialstatements and an uncertainty about the ability to continue as a going concern), relating to therestated consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Panda Ethanol, Inc.included in this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Panda Ethanol, Inc./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPDallas, Texas
##### 



1.
    
    The parties hereto agree that the Executive shall not be bound by the
provisions of Section 6.13 of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December
24, 2003 by and among American Achievement Corporation (AAC) AAC Holding Corp,
AAC Acquisition Corp. and the stockholders of AAC party hereto; provided that this
Section 1 shall in no way affect the obligations of the Executive under the
Employment Agreement.2.
    
    Except as expressly modified herein, the Employment Agreement, and all
of its terms and provisions, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall
constitute the same instrument.




---



##### 



The Executive:/s/ Norman C. SmithDate: 4-5-04The Company:
American Achievement CorporationBy:
    /s/ Mac LaFolletteMac LaFolletteTitle:
    DirectorDate:
    4/9/04Acknowledged and agreed with respect to Section 1 AAC Holding Corp.By:
    /s/ Richard C. DresdaleRichard C. DresdaleTitle:
    PresidentDate:
    4/12/04
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1931 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1931

  To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to extend the 
 firearm and ammunition prohibitions applicable to convicted felons to 
                  those convicted in a foreign court.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

Mrs. McCarthy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to extend the 
 firearm and ammunition prohibitions applicable to convicted felons to 
                  those convicted in a foreign court.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreign Felon Gun Prohibition Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FIREARM AND AMMUNITION PROHIBITIONS APPLICABLE TO 
              CONVICTED FELONS TO THOSE CONVICTED IN A FOREIGN COURT.

    Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(1), by inserting ``, including any 
        foreign court,'' after ``court''; and
            (2) in subsection (g)(1), by striking ``court of,'' and 
        inserting ``court, including any foreign court, of''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 34045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13672]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-859]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: AMRI Rensselaer, 
Inc.

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: AMRI Rensselaer, Inc. has applied to be registered as an 
importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before July 28, 2021. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before July 28, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
requests for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this 
is notice that on May 20, 2021, AMRI Rensselaer, Inc., 33 Riverside 
Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144, applied to be registered as an 
importer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code           Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Poppy Straw Concentrate................     9670   II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance to 
manufacture a bulk controlled substance for distribution to its 
customers.
    Approval of permit applications will occur only when the 
registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized 
under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import 
of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished 
dosage forms for commercial sale.

William T. McDermott,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-13672 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 60724 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. SHEKEILA JONES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 8

- 5

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and DENNIS , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Shekeila Jones pleaded guilty of conspiring to defraud the United States in connection with a scheme to create and file false and fraudulent income tax returns to induce payment of tax refunds by the Department of the Treasury. Jones was sentenced to a 15

- month term of imprisonment and to a three

- year period of supervised release, and she was ordered to make restitution to the Internal Revenue Service in the amount of $55,660.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 22, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-60724 Document: 00513125526 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2015No. 14

- 60724

2 Jones asserts t hat the district court erred in overruling her objection to the probation officer’s calculation of the amount of the loss in determining the guidelines sentence and restitution amount. She contends that the loss amount should not have included $36,600 related to five checks she cashed on behalf of her coconspirators b ecause she has consistently denied that she knew that those funds had an illicit source. The Government was require d to prove the loss amount by

a preponderance of the evidence, and the presentence report generally has sufficient indicia of reliability to permit the sentencing court to rely on it as evidence at sentencing. United States v. Ollison , 555 F.3d 152, 164 (5th Cir. 2009). Jones had the burden of presenting rebuttal evidence showing that the presentence report was materially untrue, inaccurate, or unreliable. United States v. Rodriguez , 602 F.3d 346, 363 (5th Cir. 2010). The district court found that Jones had actual knowledge that the $36,600 pecuniary loss had resulted from the offense and that Jones’s contrary assertions were not credible. See U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1, comment. (n.3(A)). We conclude that t hose findings are plausible in light of the record as a whole and that Jones has not shown that the district court clearly err ed

. See United States v. Brooks , 681 F.3d 678, 713 (5th Cir. 2012); United States v. Harris , 597 F.3d 242, 250 (5th Cir. 2010)

. The judgment is AFFIRMED

. Case: 14-60724 Document: 00513125526 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/22/2015
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

ZHAOQING NEW ZHONGYA ALUMINUM CO., LTD. 

AND ZHONGYA SHAPED ALUMINUM (HK)

HOLDING LIMITED, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

AND 

GUANG YA ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.,

FOSHAN GUANGCHENG ALUMINUM CO., LTD.,

KONG AH INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED,

GUANG YA ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES (HONG 

KONG) LIMITED, AND GUANG CHENG ALUMINUM

INDUSTRIES (USA), INC., 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FAIR TRADE 

COMMITTEE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

__________________________ 

2013-1113

__________________________ 

Case: 13-1113 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2013
ZHAOQING NEW ZHONGYA ALUMINUM V. US 2

Appeal from the United States Court of International 

Trade in consolidated Nos. 11-CV-0178 and 11-CV-0196, 

Chief Judge Donald C. Pogue. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

Before NEWMAN, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges. 

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. 

O R D E R

Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd. and 

Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited (Appellants) move for an extension of time to file a brief. 

Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee opposes and 

moves to dismiss this appeal. 

Appellants’ brief was due April 5, 2013. On April 22, 

2013, Appellants filed a motion for an extension of time 

until April 23, 2013 to file their brief. Appellants failed to 

file a brief on April 23, 2013. 

In its motion for an extension of time, Appellants’ 

counsel stated that he “was planning to file its principal 

brief by the Friday April 5, 2013 deadline” but that a 

“computer crash and loss of the pertinent files” prevented 

him. Counsel then stated that he “could have filed on 

Monday April 8, 2013” but “further reflection especially 

over the weekend of April 5-7, 2013 . . . led to the conclusion that filing the principal brief was still premature . . . 

.” 

Failure to comply with this court’s rules, including 

failure to file a brief, may result in dismissal of an appeal

for failure to prosecute. Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F.2d 

1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989). 

Case: 13-1113 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2013
3 ZHAOQING NEW ZHONGYA ALUMINUM V. US

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion for an extension of time is denied.

(2) The motion to dismiss is granted. 

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk

s26 

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 18, 2013

Case: 13-1113 Document: 40 Page: 3 Filed: 06/18/2013
Exhibit 99.2


NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WIRE SERVICES OR
DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA








LIVEREEL ANNOUNCES CHANGE OF AUDITOR





TORONTO, ONTARIO, November 17, 2016 – LiveReel Media
Corporation (OTCQB: LVRLF)
(“LiveReel” or the “Company”) announced
today that the Company’s board of directors has approved a
change in its auditor. Effective November 14, 2016, the
Company’s audit committee and board of directors has accepted
the resignation of Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP (the “Former
Auditor”) and appointed MNP LLP (the “Successor
Auditor”) as the Company’s new auditor until the close
of the next annual general meeting of the Company.





The
Company has sent a Notice of Change of Auditor (the
“Notice”) to the Former Auditor and to the Successor
Auditor and has received a letter from each, addressed to the
Ontario Securities Commission stating that they agree with the
information contained within the Notice. The Notice together with
the letter from the Former Auditor and the letter from the
Successor Auditor have been reviewed by the Company’s board
of directors and are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.





There
were no disagreements or unresolved issues with the Former Auditor
on any matter of audit scope or procedures, accounting principles
or policies, or financial statement disclosure. It is the Company's
opinion that there have been no "reportable events" (as defined in
National Instrument 51-102 - Continuous Disclosure Obligation)
between the Company and the Former Auditor.





About LiveReel





LiveReel
Media Corporation is an entertainment company focused on the
identification and evaluation of other assets or businesses for
purchase, both within and outside of the film
industry.





Contact:


Ashish Kapoor, CFO


(416)
523-3350
# L_2013352EN.01008801.xml

| 24.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 352/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 352/88

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1256/2008 of 16 December 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain welded tubes and pipes of iron or non-alloy steel originating in Belarus, the People's Republic of China and Russia following a proceeding pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, originating in Thailand following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the same Regulation, originating in Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) and an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the same Regulation, and terminating the proceedings in respect of imports of the same product originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turkey

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 19 December 2008, p. 1
  )

Page 4, recital (20) (f) Exporting producers in Ukraine, second indent

for:

| "— | OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsk Tube Rolling Plant." |
| --- | --- |

"—

OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsk Tube Rolling Plant."

read:

| "— | OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant." |
| --- | --- |

"—

OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant."

Page 36, recital (350), table, column "Company", entry for Ukraine

Page 37, Article 1(2), table, column "Company", entry for Ukraine

for:

"OJSC Interpipe Nihnedeneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant ..."

read:

"OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant ...".

---
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Eric Lincoln SELIGSON, Defendant.

No. 73 Cr. 1154 JMC.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

Feb. 14, 1974.

*639George E. Wilson, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Paul J. Curran, U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., of counsel), for the U. S.

Edward N. Leavy, New York City, (Kenneth S. Birnbaum and Leavy & Shaw, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

CANNELLA, District Judge.

Defendant, Eric Lincoln Seligson, is charged, in a one count indictment, with knowing failure to keep his local Selective Service board advised of an address where mail would reach him, Section 462(a) of the Universal Training and Service Act of 1951, 50 U.S.C. App. § 462(a),1 and 32 c.F.R. § 1641.3.2 De-

1

. Section 462(a) provides in pertinent part that:

> . . . (A)ny person . . . who in any manner shall knowingly fail or neglect or refuse to perform any duty required of him under or in the execution of this [Act], or rules, regulations, and directions made pursuant to this [Act] . . ., (is guilty of a crime).

2

. 32 C.F.R. § 1641.3 reads as follows:

> Communication by Mail. It shall be the duty of each registrant to keep his local board advised at all times of the address where mail will reach him.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.333-105560) and related Prospectus of Hewitt Associates, Inc. for the registration of shares of its Class A Common Stock and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-91274) pertaining to the Global Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan, ofour report dated October 29, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Hewitt Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003. 

 

/s/    ERNST &YOUNG LLP         

 

Chicago, Illinois 

November 17, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Accursio Licata, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), rendered on January 23, 1985, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings *502pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). No opinion. Concur&emdash;Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Fein, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.