alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Databases
                        Alfalfa Transcription Factor Database
                                    iPhyClassifier - Phytoplasma Sequence ClassificationSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory Docs





- Spiroplasma and Bees
- Spiroplasma kunkelli genome sequencing project
- Spiroplasma kunkelli plasmid

Citrus Variegated Chlorosisheadline bar Dr. John Hartung Detection of the pathogen Xylella fastidiosa in single leaf petioles and in single insect vectors, Oncometopia nigricans. Citrus branch exhibiting bright yellow Chlorotic patches indicative of CVC infectionSymptoms of Citrus Variegated Chlorosis disease, caused by the Gram negative bacterium Xyllella fastidiosa, on a sweet orange tree. In addition to the bright chlorosis, the disease also causes stunting and dramatic yield losses.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Real Estate Associates Limited VI;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November
7, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of National Partnership Investments Corp., equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices 

# Order

January 17, 2007

132507

TIMOTHY MCCLAIN, #195462

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 132507

CoA: 268783 WAYNE CIRCUIT JUDGE,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the partial filing fee as required by the order of December 5, 2006, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this file.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 17, 2007

jm
Exhibit 10.8

 

GENTHERM INCORPORATED

SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

Non-employee directors of the Board receive a mix of cash and share-based compensation. Directors who are employees or officers of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for Board service. Cash compensation is paid in advance at the annual meeting of shareholders.

 

The compensation program for non-employee directors was amended in 2014, with effect as of the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders.  

 

In addition to reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, including those incurred in attending Board and committee meetings, beginning with the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders non-employee directors receive the following: 

 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
an annual fee of $50,000 ($90,000 for the Chairman of the Board and $55,000 for the Lead Independent Director); 




 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
an annual fee of $5,000 ($10,000 for the committee chairman) for Audit, Compensation and Technology Committee members; 




 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
an annual fee of $1,000 ($5,000 for the committee chairman) for Nominating Committee members; and 




 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
$100,000 in restricted stock granted as of the date of the annual meeting of shareholders; such restricted stock vests on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the applicable director’s continued service or retirement under the terms of the Company’s incentive equity plan. 




 

Directors who are members of the Corporate Governance Committee do not receive additional cash compensation for such service.
[No. 36335-2-I.

Division One.

August 25, 1997.]

#### David Lawler, et al., *Appellants,*v. Robert Green, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-01159-6, Peter Jarvis, J., entered February 24, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Coleman, J.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime GARCIA-HERRERA, a.k.a. Cobra Barrioquatro, a.k.a. Miguel Lardoguri-Gonzales, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10188.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed June 29, 2011.

*422Bridget S. Bade, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Deborah Ann Bigbee, Esquire, Scottsdale, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jaime Garcia-Herrera appeals from the 50-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for re-entry of removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Garcia-Herrera contends that the district court proeedurally erred (1) by failing to consider his argument that the sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) lacks an empirical basis or considered rationale and is not an accurate measure of the gravity of the underlying offense; and (2) by failing to explain why it selected his sentence. We review for plain error, *see United States v. Dall-nian,*533 F.3d 755, 761 (9th Cir.2008), and affirm because Garcia-Herrera has not established any error by the district court, *see id.*at 761-62. The record shows that the court heard and considered all of Garcia-Herrera’s arguments and properly explained its rationale for selecting the sentence. *See United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez,*567 F.3d 1050, 1053-54 (9th Cir.2009).

Garcia-Herrera also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the below-Guidelines sentence was not substantively unreasonable. *See Unit*
      *423
      *ed States v. Valencia-Barragan,*608 F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (9th Cir.2010).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*ed*by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Ellen N. Biben, Inspector General of the State of New York, Respondent, v Indian Cultural and Community Center, Inc., Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 129]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered December 14, 2011, which granted petitioner’s motion to compel compliance with a subpoena and denied respondent’s cross motion to quash or limit the subpoena, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s issuance of a subpoena in connection with respondent’s purchase of state-owned property was within her statutory authority to investigate allegations of corruption and abuse in covered state-agencies (Executive Law §§ 53, 54). The subpoena was issued pursuant to petitioner’s legitimate inquiry as to whether the property was sold at a price that was artificially lowered, in exchange for campaign donations, and that the initial intended restriction of use of the property was modified from that of a community center to include senior housing. Accordingly, the request for information and documents relating to the financing of respondent’s purchase of the property was relevant and material to petitioner’s investigation into the sale of the property *(see e.g. Carl Andrews & Assoc., Inc. v Office of the Inspector Gen. of the State of N.Y.,*85 AD3d 633 [2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 805 [2012]).

We have considered respondent’s remaining arguments, including that petitioner’s investigation resulted in its investors being harassed, and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P, Andrias, Renwick, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 31

                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302

 I, Richard G. Zab, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of National City
Auto Receivables Trust 2002-A;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the specified servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the specified servicing standards identified in the Report of
Management, as generally set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
         information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:
         Wilmington Trust Company, Bank of New York.

Date: March 31, 2005              By: /s/ Richard G. Zab
                                  ----------------------------------
                                  Richard G. Zab
                                  Senior Vice President
                                  National City Bank
Exhibit 10.26


 


AMENDMENT TO UNSECURED PROMISSORY
NOTE 


 


THIS
AMENDMENT TO UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Amendment”) is dated as of January 29, 2015.


 


BETWEEN:


 


SNAP
INTERACTIVE, INC.,


as
Maker


 


AND:


 


CLIFFORD
LERNER,


as
Payee


 


WHEREAS:



  


	A.	The
    parties hereto entered into that certain Unsecured Promissory Note dated as of April 24, 2014 (the “Note”) wherein
    the Maker agreed to pay the sum of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) to the Payee; 


 


	B.	The
    parties hereto have agreed to amend the Note, as herein set out. 


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration (the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged),
the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


Unless
otherwise defined herein or unless the context otherwise requires, defined words and terms used in the Note shall have the same
meanings when used herein.


 


The
Note shall be and is hereby amended and modified as follows:


 


Section
2 of the Note shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


2.Repayments.
The principal of, and all accrued and unpaid interest on, this Note shall be due and payable on the earlier of (a) October 24,
2015 and (b) the date on which Payee declares all such amounts due and payable pursuant to Section 5 hereof (the “Maturity
Date”). All payments of interest and principal shall be in lawful money of the United States of America.


 


The
Note, together with all terms, covenants and conditions thereof as hereby amended, will be and continue to be in full force and
effect. This Amendment and everything herein contained will inure to the benefit of and be binding on the Maker and the Payee
and their respective successors and assigns. The laws of the State of New York shall govern the construction, validity, enforcement
and interpretation of this Amendment.


 


This
Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken
together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed signature page of this Amendment by
facsimile transmission or by e-mail in pdf format shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof.


 


This
Amendment shall be effective as of and from January 24, 2015.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


	The
    Maker:	 	The
    Payee:
	 	 
	SNAP
    INTERACTIVE, INC.	 	CLIFFORD
    LERNER





	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/
Alexander Harrington	 	By: 	/s/
    Clifford Lerner
	Name:
	Alexander Harrington	 	 	 
	Title: 	Chief Operating Officer
and 

Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Rivera, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (De Lury, J.), rendered February 24,1983, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606.) Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Fiber, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Amincor,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2010 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on April 15, 2011 (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: April 15, 2011                    /s/Robert L. Olson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert L. Olson, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION SECTION 1350

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianL. Knepp, Vice President of Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Brian L. Knepp                                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian L. Knepp                                            |
| Vice President of Finance and Principal Acounting Officer |

 

August 8,2006

 

----
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Corporation. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:November                18, 2005     | By:/s/                William V. Schara                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |                      William V. Schara            |
|                                                          |       Chief                Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 733 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 733

 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude 
 customary prompt pay discounts from manufacturers to wholesalers from 
   the average sales price for drugs and biologicals under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2011

  Mr. Roberts (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude 
 customary prompt pay discounts from manufacturers to wholesalers from 
   the average sales price for drugs and biologicals under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CUSTOMARY PROMPT PAY DISCOUNTS FROM MANUFACTURERS 
              TO WHOLESALERS FROM THE AVERAGE SALES PRICE FOR MEDICARE 
              PAYMENTS FOR DRUGS AND BIOLOGICALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1847A(c)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-3a(c)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ``(other than 
        customary prompt pay discounts extended to wholesalers)'' after 
        ``prompt pay discounts''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ``(other than 
        customary prompt pay discounts extended to wholesalers)'' after 
        ``other price concessions''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to drugs and biologicals that are furnished on or after January 
1, 2012.
                                 <all>
```