alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SHIPMAN, Respondent, v. TREADWELL et .al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 26, 1912.)

Action by Leonard H. Shipman, as receiver of the F. Gray Company, against George Curtis Treadwell and another.

PER CURIAM.

Decision (133 N. Y. Supp. 970) amended, by striking therefrom the words “on law and facts,” and inserting in lieu thereof “upon the law only.” See, also, supra.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT MAY 31, 1997 AND FEBRUARY 28, 1998, THE
     CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF  OPERATIONS  AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF
     STOCKHOLDERS'  DEFICIT  FOR THE YEAR  ENDED  MAY 31,  1997 AND FOR THE NINE
     MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                            38,291
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        302
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                          556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  39,914
<PP&E>                                            61,088
<DEPRECIATION>                                    16,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   109,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             17,501
<BONDS>                                           86,446
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                       18,275
<COMMON>                                               1
<OTHER-SE>                                       (24,034)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     109,137
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  55,975
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  51,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 5,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                       1,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                1,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (730)
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         550
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0



</TABLE>
#### ROCK, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department;

November 27, 1907.)

Action by Edgar Rock against the International Paper Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

CHESTER and KELLOGG, JJ., dissent.
#### STAIGER, Appellant, v. KLITZ et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 4, 1907.)

Action by Christopher Staiger against Robert H. Klitz and another.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003, (the Report) of The Hillman Companies, Inc. (the
Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof; I, James P. Waters, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ James P. WatersName: James P. WatersDate: March 26, 2004
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Diet, Genomics and Immunology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Porcine DatabaseSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC) Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center Diet, Genomics and Immunology Laboratory





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar   ARS News Articles  New Technique for Mining Health-conferring Soy CompoundsJul 22, 2015USDA's Agricultural Research Service Honors Scientists of the YearSep 09, 2014Concentration, Timing and Interactions are Key When it Comes to Dietary CompoundsJul 16, 2010Researchers Study Factors that Regulate Vaccination EfficiencyAug 28, 2009Pig Gene Database Supports Human Nutrition, Immunity StudiesAug 26, 2005


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### David D. MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HURON COUNTY, OHIO; Joseph B. Kovach; Carl Essex, Individually and in their official capacities as agents, officers, and/or employees of the County of Huron, Ohio, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-3308.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 2009.

*918BEFORE: RYAN, SILER, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

RYAN, Circuit Judge.

David D. Myers appeals from a district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.

I.

The parties are familiar with the facts and, therefore, they need not be recounted at length in this unpublished opinion. It is sufficient to note that the Huron County Engineer’s Office terminated Myers’s employment for sexually harassing a female coworker. Myers subsequently brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the defendants, claiming they discriminated against him by firing him in retaliation for exercising his First Amendment free speech rights, and also violated his rights under various state laws. The district court, which refused to consider a belatedly filed affidavit raising new allegations, granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, holding that Myers’s federal claims lacked merit as a matter of law and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims.

II.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment *de novo, International Union v. Cummins, Inc.,*434 F.3d 478, 483 (6th Cir.2006), and its refusal to consider an affidavit filed as an appendix to a motion in opposition of a motion for summary judgment for an abuse of discretion. *Briggs v. Potter,*463 F.3d 507, 511 (6th Cir.2006).

III.

After carefully reviewing the district court’s opinion, the arguments of the parties, and the record, we are satisfied, for the reasons stated in United States District Judge James G. Carr’s clearly reasoned and well written opinion, that the district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to consider Myers’s extraneous affidavit, and properly granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants.

IV.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### Winfred R. BRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward WRIGHT, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 08-7605.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 29, 2008.

Decided: Jan. 13, 2009.

*814Winfred R. Bright, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Winfred R. Bright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R. Crim.P. 86 motion and Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bright has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Genomics & Gene Mappingheadline bar Research


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
**Exhibit 31 (ii)**

 

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Sonya E. Scott, ChiefFinancial Officer, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 10, 2004

 
|   |                     |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Sonya E.  Scott          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
S. 684 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To provide for the conveyance of certain parcels of land to the town of Alta, 

Utah. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE. 

(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

(1) NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND.—The term ‘‘National 

Forest System land’’ means the parcels of National Forest 

System land that— 

(A) are located— 

(i) in sec. 5, T. 3 S., R. 3 E., Salt Lake meridian; 

(ii) in, and adjacent to, parcels of land subject 

to special use permit SLC102708, the authority of 

which expires on December 30, 2026; 

(iii) in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest in Salt 

Lake County, Utah; and 

(iv) in the incorporated boundary of the town of 

Alta, Utah; and 

(B) consist of approximately 2 acres (including appurtenances). 

(2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of Agriculture. 

(3) TOWN.—The term ‘‘Town’’ means the town of Alta, Utah. 

(b) CONVEYANCE.—On the request of the Town submitted to 

the Secretary by the date that is not later than 1 year after 

the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey to 

the Town, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of 

the United States in and to the National Forest System land. 

(c) SURVEY; COSTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with paragraphs (2) and 

(3), the exact acreage and legal description of the National 

Forest System land shall be determined by a survey approved 

by the Secretary. 

(2) MAXIMUM AREA.—The acreage of the National Forest 

System land determined under paragraph (1) may not exceed 

2 acres. 

(3) COSTS.—The Town shall pay the reasonable survey 

and other administrative costs associated with the conveyance. 

(d) USE OF NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND.—As a condition 

of the conveyance under subsection (b), the Town shall use the 

National Forest System land only for public purposes. 

(e) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—In the deed to the Town, the 

Secretary shall provide that the National Forest System land shall 
S. 684—2 

revert to the Secretary, at the election of the Secretary based 

on the best interests of the United States, if the National Forest 

System land is used for a purpose other than a public purpose. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—With respect to the 

conveyance under subsection (b), the Secretary may require such 

additional terms and conditions as the Secretary determines to 

be appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-87958, 333-127367, and 333-181318 on Form S-8 and No. 333-182383 on Form S-3 of Regal Entertainment Group of our report dated March 3, 2014, relating to the financial statements of National CineMedia, LLC, appearing in Regal Entertainment Group’s Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 26, 2013.

 
| /s/   Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
| Denver,   Colorado                   |
| March 13,   2014                |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

COLLEEN FLYNN SHANAHAN 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM RETIRED STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 172 DB 2015 (No. 77 RST 2015) 

Attorney Registration No. 207582 

(Philadelphia) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2015, the Report and Recommendation 

of Disciplinary Board Member dated November 16, 2015, is approved and it is 

ORDERED that Colleen Flynn Shanahan, who has been on Retired Status, has never 

been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral 

qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 391 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 391

 To rescind unobligated stimulus funds and require that such funds be 
               used for Federal budget deficit reduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2011

   Mr. Moran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rescind unobligated stimulus funds and require that such funds be 
               used for Federal budget deficit reduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Recovering Excessive Stimulus 
Expenditures for Taxpayers Act'' or the ``RESET Act''.

SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED STIMULUS FUNDS.

    (a) Rescission of Unobligated Stimulus Funds.--Effective on the 
date of the enactment of this section, there are rescinded all 
unobligated balances of the discretionary appropriations made available 
by division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 
(Public Law 111-5).
    (b) Use for Deficit Reduction.--All appropriations rescinded in 
subsection (a) shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury 
and used for Federal budget deficit reduction.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

To The Board of Directors

Tiens Biotech Group (USA), Inc.

Consent of Independent Accountants Tiens Biotech Group (USA), Inc. Audited
Financial Statements December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.

We consent to the incorporation in the Annual Report of Tiens Biotech Group
(USA), Inc on Form 10-K of our report dated March 15, 2006 on our audits of the
financial statements of Tiens Biotech Group (USA), Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and for the years then ended, which our
reports are incorporated in the Form 10-K.

                                 /s/ Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP

                                 Walnut, California
                                 March 31, 2006