alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs Historical Perspectives







Jesse and Janet Anderson train plow horse, 1938headline bar Jesse and Janet Anderson train plow horses in 1938Jesse and Janet Anderson are shown training a two-year-old horse to plow, in approximately 1938.  The young horse closest to the camera is teamed with an experienced plow horse.  Mrs. Anderson is guiding the plow and Mr. Anderson has the reins.Submitted May 2006 by Glen Anderson, Raleigh Co. WV Historical Perspectives Picture index AFSRC Home


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               7,414,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                1,285,894
<INVENTORY>                                 1,180,652
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           57,201,022
<PP&E>                                      7,098,720
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,388,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             66,903,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       3,519,893
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      193,619
<OTHER-SE>                                 62,447,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               66,903,712
<SALES>                                     6,028,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            6,028,297
<CGS>                                       1,535,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,535,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            7,283,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             58,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (2,471,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (2,471,127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2,471,127)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.15)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Garnett Leacock, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 394]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered November 15, 2011) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier II hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ordered that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see Matter of Free v Coombe,*234 AD2d 996 [1996]). Present — Smith, J.P., Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
Exhibit 11.1


                     ANCHOR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    Thirteen weeks ended               Thirty-nine weeks ended
                                                              September 27,     September 28,        September 27,  September 28,
                                                                  1997              1996                 1997           1996
                                                                  ----              ----                 ----           ----
<S>                                                              <C>             <C>                  <C>              <C>

Net income before extraordinary item
   cumulative effect.......................................      $(1,017)        $   (381)            $    293         $2,457
Extraordinary item.........................................           --               --               (1,210)            --
Net Income (loss)..........................................      $(1,107)        $   (381)            $   (917)        $2,457
                                                                 ========        =========            =========        ======

Common shares outstanding..................................        1,551            1,018                1,370          1,018
Common equivalent shares issuable upon exercise
   of stock options and warrants (1).......................           --              400                   --            400
                                                                 --------        ---------            ---------        ------

Total weighted average shares..............................        1,551            1,418                1,370          1,418
                                                                 --------        ---------            ---------        ------

Earnings per common and equivalent share before
   extraordinary item......................................      $ (0.71)        $  (0.27)             $ (0.21)        $ 1.73
Extraordinary item per common and equivalent
   shares..................................................           --            (0.88)                0.00           0.00
                                                                 --------        ---------             --------        ------

Earnings per common and equivalent share...................      $ (0.71)        $  (0.27)             $ (0.67)        $ 1.73
                                                                 ========        =========             ========        ======

</TABLE>


Notes:

(1) Amount calculated using the modified treasury stock method and fair market
values.
EXHIBIT 31.3

Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands company

I, Dennis
J. Lubojacky, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Noble Corporation; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2014

|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                             
|/s/ Dennis J. Lubojacky                                                                                      
|Dennis J. Lubojacky
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands company
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Docs





- Find a person
- Find a location
- ARS Organizational Chart
- People

Harvest Time Grillheadline bar  Phone: 301-345-7406 Open Daily from 6:30 a.m. until 2:00 p.m.       Breakfast:        Lunch:          Hot meals are only served until 1:30 p.m.   Snacks and Drinks:


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form
10-K of Nextest Systems Corporation for the period ended June 24, 2006, we, Robin Adler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and James P. Moniz, Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Nextest Systems Corporation, hereby certify to the best
of our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 24, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 24, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Nextest Systems Corporation.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                     
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Date: September 12, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBIN ADLER                                                  
|                         |  |  |  | Robin Adler Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)   
|                         |  | 
|Date: September 12, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES P. MONIZ                                               
|                         |  |  |  | James P. Moniz Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
EX-10.1.1



 Exhibit 10.1.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT NO. C-00061901 

BETWEEN 
 L’Institut Pasteur, a public
interest foundation, 25, rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, represented by Mr. Jean Castex, adjunct General Manager for administration and finance, and by Mr. Christian POLICARD, Director of Business Development and Industrial Partnerships.

 Hereafter referred to as “IP” or the “LICENSOR”, acting both on its own behalf and on behalf of: 

 

	•	 	Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 

 4, place de Jussieu, 

75252 Paris Cedex 05, 
 Hereafter
referred to as “UPMC”, 
  

	•	 	Le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 

 3, rue Michel-Ange, 

75794 Paris Cedex 16 
 Hereafter
referred to as “CNRS”. 
 Jointly also referred to as the “LICENSOR”, 

Party of the first part, 
 AND: 

CELLECTIS, a public limited company with a capital of 123,463.48 euros, headquartered at 28, rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, represented by
Mr. André Choulika, acting as Chief Executive Officer 
 Hereafter referred to as “CELLECTIS” or the “LICENSEE”, 

Party of the second part. 
 The LICENSOR and LICENSEE are
hereafter referred to as the “Parties”. 
 RECITALS: 

The parties signed a patent and patent application license agreement on June 19, 2000 related to the gene of the I-Sce I enzyme, the expression of
the I-Sce I enzyme and its use. 
 Article 2.6 of the agreement stipulates that the IMPROVEMENTS achieved by the LICENSOR be granted under an
exclusive license to the LICENSEE in accordance with the terms and restrictions of the contract, for no additional charge. 
 The LICENSOR has now achieved
a technological improvement which it wishes in this amendment to grant to the Licensee. 







 It is thus agreed as follows: 

ARTICLE 1 
 The Parties agree to add to Article
1.2, “AGREEMENT PATENTS”, U.S. patent application no. US 275,638 filed on March 15, 2001 and titled “Characterization of the I-SpomI Endonuclease from fission yeast”, including the PCT extension of this application,
published under no. WO 02/ 074965, the patent applications and patents resulting therefrom, any patent applications claiming priority over one of the aforementioned applications, any divisional applications, any continuing applications or any
applications for re-issue filed on the basis of the aforementioned patents and patent applications. 
 The LICENSOR agrees to provide all KNOW-HOW
pertaining thereto, notably the biological material containing the coding sequences for endonuclease I-SpomI and the sequences corresponding to the cleavage site for endonuclease I-SpomI. 

ARTICLE 2 
 The other provisions of the AGREEMENT
remain unchanged and continue to apply between the Parties. 
 This amendment shall enter into force on the date of filing of the priority patent
application on March 15, 2001. 
  

					
	 Signed in Paris on
 In 2 original
copies.
		[Handwritten text: December 20, 2002]		


					
			
	CELLECTIS				INSTITUT PASTEUR
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Tawny Sage Eagle LOUSE, Appellant.

No. 11-2044.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 21, 2011.

Filed: Nov. 23, 2011.

Eric D. Kelderman, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Heather Thompson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Rapid City, SD, for Appellee.

Gary G. Colbath, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Rapid City, SD, for Appellant.

Tawny Sage Eagle Louse, Waseca, MN, pro se.

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Tawny Sage Eagle Louse challenges the 18-month prison sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking her probation. *401Upon careful review, we first conclude that the district court did not commit any procedural error, much less plain error, in sentencing Eagle Louse. *See United States v. Thunder,*553 F.3d 605, 608 (8th Cir.2009) (plain error review applies where defendant does not object at sentencing to adequacy of district court’s explanation or consideration of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); court did not commit plain error where it recited some of defendant’s history, discussed his various violations, recognized appropriate statutory maximum, referenced advisory Guidelines range, and noted defendant’s continuing alcohol problem and failure to follow rules); *see also United States v. Perkins,*526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir.2008) (district court need not make specific findings on § 3553(a) factors; all that is generally required to satisfy appellate court is evidence that court was aware of relevant factors). We further conclude that the sentence the district court imposed upon revoking Eagle Louse’s probation was not unreasonable. *See United States v. Tyson,*413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)); *United States v. White Face,*383 F.3d 733, 738 (8th Cir.2004) (Chapter 7 of Guidelines is merely advisory, and thus revocation sentence above recommended range is not upward departure); *ef. Thunder,*553 F.3d at 609 (sentence above advisory Guidelines range upon revocation of supervised release was not substantively unreasonable where defendant repeatedly violated conditions of supervised release).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Battey, United States District Judge for the District of South *401Dakota.
Form of Annual Advisory Fee Termination - Goldman, Sachs & Co.



 Exhibit 10.18b 
 Form of Annual Advisory Fee Termination 
 [KAR Auction Services, Inc. Letterhead]

 December [        ], 2009 
 Goldman, Sachs & Co. 
 85 Broad Street

 New York, New York 10004 
 Ladies
and Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made to the Financial Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”), dated as of
April 20, 2007 and attached hereto as Annex A, whereby KAR Auction Services, Inc. (formerly, KAR Holdings, Inc.) (the “Company”) agreed to retain you, Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman”), and any of your affiliates
or designees (collectively, with Goldman, the “Goldman Group”), among other things, to provide consulting and advisory services to the Company commencing on the date thereof for a term ending on the date on which Goldman and its
affiliates or any private equity funds managed by Goldman cease to own, directly or indirectly, any equity interests of the Company. 
 In connection with the settlement of the initial public offering (the “Offering”) of [23,000,000] shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, on the date hereof, the Company and the Goldman Group
hereby agree that the annual advisory fee (the “Annual Advisory Fee”) described in the Advisory Agreement [and the obligations of the Goldman Group to provide services under the Advisory Agreement shall, in each case,] be
terminated, effective upon payment referenced in the following sentence. In consideration for the termination of the Annual Advisory Fee, the Company agrees to pay Goldman a one-time fee of $3,103,584.18 concurrent with the settlement of the
Offering. 
 All other obligations of the Company set forth in the Advisory Agreement shall survive the termination of the
Annual Advisory Fee. 
 This letter agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York. 
 [Remainder of the page intentionally left blank] 







 If you are in agreement with the foregoing, kindly so indicate by signing a counterpart of
this letter, whereupon it will become a binding agreement between us. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	KAR AUCTION SERVICES, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:


 Agreed and accepted: 
 Goldman, Sachs & Co. 
  

					
		 	By:	 	  

		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:








 Annex A 
 Financial Advisory Agreement