alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 125 (Friday, July 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 35288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9057-2]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed June 21, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through June 28, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210084, Final, NMFS, ME, Regulatory Impact Review and Final 
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Amending the Atlantic Large Whale 
Take Reduction Plan: Risk Reduction Rule, Review Period Ends: 08/02/
2021, Contact: Jennifer Anderson 978-281-9226.
EIS No. 20210085, Final, BLM, CO, Blue Valley Ranch Land Exchange, 
Review Period Ends: 08/02/2021, Contact: William Mills 970-724-3001.
EIS No. 20210086, Draft, FERC, LA, East Lateral Xpress Project, Comment 
Period Ends: 08/16/2021, Contact: Office of External Affairs 866-208-
3372.

Amended Notice

EIS No. 20210047, Draft Supplement, FHWA, KS, South Lawrence 
Trafficway, Comment Period Ends: 09/30/2021, Contact: Javier Ahumada 
785-273-2649. Revision to FR Notice Published 05/07/2021; Extending the 
Comment Period from 06/21/2021 to 09/30/2021.

    Dated: June 28, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-14172 Filed 7-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3716 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include vaccines against 

seasonal influenza within the definition of taxable vaccines. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 2, 2013 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

vaccines against seasonal influenza within the definition 

of taxable vaccines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF VACCINES AGAINST SEASONAL 

4 INFLUENZA TO LIST OF TAXABLE VACCINES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (N) of section 

6 4132(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended by inserting ‘‘or any other vaccine against sea8 sonal influenza’’ before the period. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 3716 CPS

1 (1) SALES, ETC.—The amendment made by this 

2 section shall apply to sales and uses on or after the 

3 later of— 

4 (A) the first day of the first month which 

5 begins more than 4 weeks after the date of the 

6 enactment of this Act, or 

7 (B) the date on which the Secretary of 

8 Health and Human Services lists any vaccine 

9 against seasonal influenza (other than any vac10 cine against seasonal influenza listed by the 

11 Secretary prior to the date of the enactment of 

12 this Act) for purposes of compensation for any 

13 vaccine-related injury or death through the Vac14 cine Injury Compensation Trust Fund. 

15 (2) DELIVERIES.—For purposes of paragraph 

16 (1) and section 4131 of the Internal Revenue Code 

17 of 1986, in the case of sales on or before the effec18 tive date described in such paragraph for which de19 livery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 

20 be considered the sale date. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
Exhibit 4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 
  





 
 DP SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THIS CERTIFIES
THAT is the owner of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or speciman assigned. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the
Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR VALUE, OF SECRETARY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER S H A R E S
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. CUSIP 253031 10 8 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC (Brooklyn, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR By: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 







 



 
 SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. TEN COM — as tenants in common TEN ENT — as tenants by the entireties JT TEN — as joint tenants
with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they
were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: NOTICE: Shares PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE of the Common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian
(Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) Attorney
Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO THE MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD. 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 The Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Amended and Restated 1995 Stock
Option Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended effective June 10, 2009, as follows: 
 1. The first sentence of
Section 3 of the Plan is amended to provide in its entirety as follows: 
 Subject to Section 14, Shares that may be
issued with respect to Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed an aggregate of 383,440,718. Shares of Common Stock; provided however, that on the first business day of each fiscal year starting January 31, 2010 or after, and continuing
until the earlier of January 31, 2013 or termination of the Plan, there shall be added to this Plan the lesser of an additional (i) 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock, or (ii) 5.0% of the outstanding shares of capital stock on such
date, or (iii) an amount determined by the Board (provided that the amount approved by the Board shall not be greater than (i) or (ii)).
EXHIBIT  32.1  &  32.2

      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of Technology Connections,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for  the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
G.  Kyzer,  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify  that:

*    the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

*    information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  Kevin  G.  Kyzer
---------------------
Kevin  G.  Kyzer
Director, President, Chief Executive Officer,
and  Chief  Financial Officer


August 5,  2004


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of
Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.
#### VIO CHEMICAL CO., Respondent, v. STUDHOLME, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 2, 1907.)

Action by the Vio Chemical Company against Foster Studholme.

*1149PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 103 N. Y. Supp. 463.

KRUSE, J., dissents.
Exhibit 99.3

Date: 02/26/2002       Client Distribution History Report            Page 1 of 1
                    Date Range - From 1/02/2001 to: 12/31/01

PAYABLE DATE:   December 26, 2001

-------------------------------------------
CLIENT: 9167- Equity One ABS, Series 2001-3
-------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Pool Number
Series      Cusip No.    Beginning Prin Bal   Principal Paid    Interest Paid    Total Distrib
---------- ------------  ------------------   --------------  ---------------  ---------------
<S>        <C>             <C>                 <C>                <C>            <C>
af1        294754AH9         100,000,000.00      3,927,482.88       257,916.67     4,185,399.55
af2        294754AJ5          50,000,000.00              0.00       174,916.67       174,916.67
af3        294754AK2          27,500,000.00              0.00       118,960.42       118,960.42
af4        294754AL0          32,873,000.00              0.00       157,571.25       157,571.25
aio        294754AN6          26,000,000.00              0.00       130,000.00       130,000.00
av1        294754AM8          51,254,000.00        915,096.05       136,748.52     1,051,844.57
r          N/A                         0.00              0.00             0.00             0.00
x          N/A               261,627,824.45              0.00             8.63             8.63

           PAYABLE TOTALS:                       4,842,578.93       976,122.16     5,818,701.09

           GRAND TOTALS:                         4,842,578.93       976,122.16     5,818,701.09

<CAPTION>

Pool Number     Interest    Net Interest                      Ending   Int@Mtg   Servicer
Series        Adjustment    Distribution   Other            Prin Bal     Rate        Fee
---------- -------------  --------------  ------      --------------   ------     -------
<S>          <C>           <C>             <C>        <C>               <C>        <C>
af1                 0.00      257,916.67    0.00       96,072,517.12     0.00       0.00
af2                 0.00      174,916.67    0.00       50,000,000.00     0.00       0.00
af3                 0.00      118,960.42    0.00       27,500,000.00     0.00       0.00
af4                 0.00      157,571.25    0.00       32,873,000.00     0.00       0.00
aio                 0.00      130,000.00    0.00       26,000,000.00     0.00       0.00
av1                 0.00      136,748.52    0.00       50,338,903.95     0.00       0.00
r                   0.00            0.00    0.00                0.00     0.00       0.00
x                   0.00            8.63    0.00      257,791,200.98     0.00       0.00

PAYABLE TOTALS:     0.00      976,122.16    0.00      540,575,622.05     0.00       0.00

GRAND TOTALS:       0.00      976,122.16    0.00      540,575,622.05     0.00       0.00

</TABLE>
Exhibit 3.4

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
PACIFIC ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.

This Amendment No. 2 (this "Amendment No. 2") to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership"), as amended by Amendment No. 1, effective as of August 1, 2003 (the
"Partnership Agreement"), is entered into effective as of January 27, 2004, by Pacific Energy GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as general
partner of the Partnership (the "General Partner"). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

WHEREAS, the General Partner, the Organizational Limited Partner and the Limited Partners of the Partnership entered into that certain
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership dated as of July 26, 2002;

WHEREAS, the General Partner adopted Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Partnership effective as of August 1, 2003;

WHEREAS, Section 13.1(d)(i) of the Partnership Agreement provides that the General Partner may amend any provision of the
Partnership Agreement without the approval of any Partner or Assignee to reflect a change that, in the discretion of the General Partner, does not adversely affect the Limited Partners (including any
particular class of Partnership Interests) in any material respect;

WHEREAS, acting pursuant to the power and authority granted to it under Section 13.1(d)(i) of the Partnership Agreement, the
General Partner has determined that the following amendment to the Partnership Agreement does not adversely affect the Limited Partners (including any particular class of Partnership Interests as
compared to other classes of Partnership Interests) in any material respect.

NOW THEREFORE, the General Partner does hereby amend the Partnership Agreement as follows:

Section 1.Amendment.



Section 2. Ratification of Partnership Agreement. Except as expressly modified and amended herein, all of the terms and conditions
of the Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 3.Governing Law. This Amendment No. 2 will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Delaware.

[The Remainder Of This Page Is Intentionally Blank]



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the General Partner has executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date first set forth above.

| |  | GENERAL PARTNER:       
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | PACIFIC ENERGY GP, INC.
| |  | By:                    



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: ROY TRUSS

PETITION OF: ROY TRUSS :

:

:

:

: No. 712 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of March, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 81 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 81

   To direct unused appropriations for Senate Official Personnel and 
 Office Expense Accounts to be deposited in the Treasury and used for 
            deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Isakson (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Johanns, Mr. 
  Burr, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Lee, Ms. Collins, Mr. Enzi, Mr. 
  Johnson of Wisconsin, Mr. Paul, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Thune, Mr. Brown of 
Massachusetts, and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct unused appropriations for Senate Official Personnel and 
 Office Expense Accounts to be deposited in the Treasury and used for 
            deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN SENATE OFFICIAL PERSONNEL AND 
              OFFICE EXPENSE ACCOUNTS TO BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION 
              OR TO REDUCE THE FEDERAL DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
amounts appropriated for the Senate Official Personnel and Office 
Expense Accounts for the United States Senate for a fiscal year which 
remain after all payments are made under such accounts for the year 
shall be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, 
except that in the case of a fiscal year for which there is no Federal 
budget deficit, such amounts shall be used to reduce the Federal debt 
(in such manner as the Secretary of the Treasury considers 
appropriate).
    (b) Regulations.--The Committee on Rules and Administration shall 
promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this 
section.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
fiscal year 2012 and each succeeding fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019406EN.01001001.xml

| 2.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi (Spain) lodged on 26 August 2019 — Confederación Sindical Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi v Ayuntamiento de Arrigorriaga

(Case C-635/19)

(2019/C 406/15)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Confederación Sindical Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi

Defendant: Ayuntamiento de Arrigorriaga

Question referred

Does Directive 2014/24/EU (1) preclude national legislation, such as Article 122(2) of the LCSP, (2) which compels contracting authorities to include in the procurement documents governing a public contract a special condition of performance imposing on the successful tenderer an obligation to guarantee that the pay conditions applicable to workers under the relevant sectoral collective agreement will at least be honoured, even if that sectoral collective agreement is not binding on the undertaking to which the contract is awarded under the rules governing collective bargaining and collective agreements, which establish the primacy of the company agreement on pay and provide for the possibility of not applying a collective agreement in force for economic, technical, organisational or production reasons?

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

(2)  Law 9/2017 of 8 November 2017 on Public Sector Contracts.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 878 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 878

     To amend section 520 of the Housing Act of 1949 to revise the 
requirements for areas to be considered as rural areas for purposes of 
                               such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2011

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend section 520 of the Housing Act of 1949 to revise the 
requirements for areas to be considered as rural areas for purposes of 
                               such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Housing Preservation Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF RURAL AREA.

    The second sentence of section 520 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 
U.S.C. 1490) is amended by striking: ``1990 or 2000 decennial census 
shall continue to be so classified until the receipt of data from the 
decennial census in the year 2010'' and inserting ``1990, 2000, or 2010 
decennial census shall continue to be so classified until the receipt 
of data from the decennial census in the year 2020''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6423

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT LAWRENCE PAYNE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-90-20-R, CA-96-920-R) Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: October 5, 1998 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lawrence Payne, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Payne , No. CR-90-20-R, CA-96-920-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2019413EN.01003001.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/30

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 1 October 2019 — Criminal proceedings against HP

(Case C-724/19)

(2019/C 413/36)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Party to the main proceedings

HP

Question referred

Is a national law (Article 5(1)(1) of the Zakon za Evropeyskata zapoved za razsledvane (Law on the European investigation order; ‘the ZEZR’)), according to which, during the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings, the authority competent to issue a European investigation order for the provision of traffic and location data related to telecommunications is a public prosecutor, consistent with Article 2(c)(i) of Directive 2014/41 (1) and the principle of equivalence, provided that in an identical domestic case the competent authority is a judge?

Does recognition of that European investigation order by the competent authority of the executing State (public prosecutor or an investigating judge) replace the court order required under the law of the issuing State?

---

(1)  Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters.

OJ 2014 L 130, p. 1.

---