alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Motor function in healthy and clinical populations.                    

*Date:*                         August 3, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maribeth Champoux, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3170, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3163,                         *champoum@csr.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 6, 2021.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-14697 Filed 7-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM *ILLEGIBLE
INFORMATION* AND IS QULAIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-24-1999
<CASH>                                           3,255
<SECURITIES>                                       560
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,920
<PP&E>                                         221,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,877
<BONDS>                                        207,808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   292,089
<SALES>                                        231,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,189
<CGS>                                          166,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (401)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (132)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (269)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (6,766)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,035)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2019172EN.01002001.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/20

---

Action brought on 8 March 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Finland

(Case C-217/19)

(2019/C 172/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes, E. Ljung Rasmussen, Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Finland

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that by recurrently granting authorizations for spring hunting of male Common Eiders (Somateria mollissima) in the province of Åland since 2011, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(4) and 9(l)(c) of Directive 2009/147/EC (1) of the European parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by recurrently granting authorizations for spring hunting of male Common Eiders (Somateria mollissima) in the province of Åland since 2011, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(4) and 9(l)(c) of Directive 2009/147/EC (1) of the European parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds;

| — | order Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Since 2011, the regional government of the Åland Islands, an autonomous region in Finland, has recurrently each year authorized ‘derogation spring hunting’ of male Common Eider ducks with a total quota of 2000 to 3800 birds during two to three weeks in May. This time period coincides with the period of reproduction of Common Eiders.

Article 7(4) of Directive 2009/147/EC prohibits hunting during the period of reproduction.

Finland claims that the spring hunting of Common Eiders in the Åland Islands is justified by the derogation provision of Article 9(1)(c) of Directive 2009/147/EC. According to the case-law of the Court, Member States bear the burden of proof for establishing that the conditions of this provision are met.

The Commission considers that Finland, first, has not established that the derogation regime constitutes ‘judicious use’ within the meaning of Article 9(1)(c) of Directive 2009/147/EC. Finland has, in particular, not substantiated with sound scientific evidence that it is ensured that the relevant population of Common Eider ducks is maintained at a satisfactory level.

Secondly, Finland has not demonstrated that the authorized spring hunting only concerns the use of birds ‘in small numbers’ pursuant to Article 9(1)(c) of Directive 2009/147/EC.

---

(1)  Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 2010, L 20, p-7)

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 80 

To provide a permanent deduction for State and local general sales taxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

ALEXANDER, Mr. ENZI, and Mr. THUNE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide a permanent deduction for State and local general 

sales taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR 

4 STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL SALES TAXES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (I) of section 

6 164(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 

7 amended by section 722 of the Tax Relief, Unemployment 

8 Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010, 

9 is amended by striking ‘‘, and before January 1, 2012’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 80 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
NUMBER 13-13-00016-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

LARRY DONELL FARROW, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 329th District Court 

of Wharton County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Larry Donell Farrow, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction 

for evading arrest. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence in this matter was imposed on April 20, 2011. No motion for new trial 

was filed. Notice of appeal was filed on December 30, 2012. On February 21, 2013, 

the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely 
2

perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was 

not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court=s directive. On March 

4, 2013, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel=s response does not 

establish that an appeal was timely filed. 

Unless a motion for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed 

within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after 

the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a 

timely motion for new trial has been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety 

days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. See id. 26.2(a)(2). 

The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the 

deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying 

with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.

Appellant=s notice of appeal, filed more than twenty months after sentence was 

imposed, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See 

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210. Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a 

post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; 

however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 

S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

28th day of March, 2013
# C_2019238EN.01000401.xml

| 15.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/4

---

Appeal brought on 11 January 2019 by the Court of Auditors of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 8 November 2018 in Case T-874/16, RA v Court of Auditors

(Case C-27/19 P)

(2019/C 238/05)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: E. von Bardeleben, C. Lesauvage, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: RA

By order of 24 April 2019, the Court (Ninth Chamber) removed the case from the register of the Court.

---
[Cite as Hicks v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2011-Ohio-3771.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us

CHRIS HICKS 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2010-11030-AD 

Clerk Miles C. Durfey 

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT 

{¶ 1} Plaintiff, Chris Hicks, filed this action against defendant, Department of 

Transportation (ODOT), contending that his 2001 Honda Civic was damaged as a 

proximate cause of negligence on the part of ODOT in maintaining a hazardous 

condition in a construction area on Interstate 75 in Warren County. Plaintiff requested 

damages in the amount of $461.85, plus filing fee reimbursement of $25.00. The filing 

fee was paid. 

{¶ 2} ODOT filed an investigation report requesting that plaintiff’s claim be 

dismissed, advising that the claim was paid and settled by ODOT contractor, John R. 

Jurgensen Company. Defendant provided a copy of check number 00499119 issued to 

plaintiff by John R. Jurgensen Company in the amount of $486.85. 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

{¶ 3} R.C. 2743.02(D) in pertinent part states: “Recoveries against the state shall 
be reduced by the aggregate of insurance proceeds, disability award, or other collateral 

recovery received by the claimant.” Upon review, the court finds that the money 

received by plaintiff is a recovery from a collateral source. 

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us 

CHRIS HICKS 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2010-11030-AD 

Clerk Miles C. Durfey 

ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION

 Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth 

in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, plaintiff’s claim is DISMISSED. 

The court shall absorb the court costs for this claim in excess of the filing fee. 

 

 ________________________________ 

 MILES C. DURFEY 
 Clerk 

Entry cc: 

Chris Hicks Jerry Wray, Director 

269 Village Drive Department of Transportation 

Springboro, Ohio 45066 1980 West Broad Street 

 Columbus, Ohio 43223 

RDK/laa 

3/2 

Filed 4/20/11 

Sent to S.C. reporter 7/29/11
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AMERICARE
HEALTH SCAN, INC. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, DR. JOSEPH P. D'ANGELO, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify that

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Dr. Joseph P. D'Angelo
----------------------------------
DR. JOSEPH P. D'ANGELO


August 20, 2002
MELVIN T. DIXON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1651

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Edward P. Nickinson, III, Judge.

Melvin T. Dixon, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,825
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,602
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     57,355
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             200
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               200
<LOANS>                                        150,615
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,695
<DEPOSITS>                                     200,100
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,978
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,170
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 228,695
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,909
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,634
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   409
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,952
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,251
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,500
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,452
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      255
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (107)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,197
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,197
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.40
<LOANS-NON>                                        296
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   911
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,485
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       23
<RECOVERIES>                                       125
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,842
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,842
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 366 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ERICA ANN DION,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 19, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 12 2021

03/12/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0366
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3716 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

vaccines against seasonal influenza within the definition 

of taxable vaccines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3716 ES

1 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF VACCINES AGAINST SEASONAL 

2 INFLUENZA TO LIST OF TAXABLE VACCINES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (N) of section 

4 4132(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

5 amended by inserting ‘‘or any other vaccine against sea6 sonal influenza’’ before the period. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

8 (1) SALES, ETC.—The amendment made by this 

9 section shall apply to sales and uses on or after the 

10 later of— 

11 (A) the first day of the first month which 

12 begins more than 4 weeks after the date of the 

13 enactment of this Act, or 

14 (B) the date on which the Secretary of 

15 Health and Human Services lists any vaccine 

16 against seasonal influenza (other than any vac17 cine against seasonal influenza listed by the 

18 Secretary prior to the date of the enactment of 

19 this Act) for purposes of compensation for any 

20 vaccine-related injury or death through the Vac21 cine Injury Compensation Trust Fund. 

22 (2) DELIVERIES.—For purposes of paragraph 

23 (1) and section 4131 of the Internal Revenue Code 

24 of 1986, in the case of sales on or before the effec25 tive date described in such paragraph for which de-
3 

†S 3716 ES

1 livery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 

2 be considered the sale date. 

Passed the Senate January 2, 2013. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3716 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

the definition of taxable vaccines. include vaccines against seasonal influenza within
#### City of New York v Hollander.

Motion, insofar as it seeks reargument, granted, and upon reargument, the penultimate sentence of this court’s memorandum decision entered on March 5,1985 (109 AD2d 603, 604) amended to read as follows: “There was a requirement that Eugene make restitution of $1,000,000 in connection with his plea of guilty and being placed on probation as a result of charges in the nursing home scandal, which amount has been paid.” The motion is otherwise denied.

Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross and Fein, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  March 31, 2011
/s/ Crit S. DeMentName: Crit S. DeMentTitle: Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner