alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James Hennen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ James HennenJames Hennen
Chief Financial Officer
April 25, 2007
certofamend.htm


     

    Exhibit 4.7


    CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT

    TO

    AMENDED
AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

    OF

    UNIVERSAL
INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

     

    


    Universal
Insurance Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:

     

    FIRST:   The
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended by deleting paragraph (a) of Article IV of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation in its entirety and substituting therefor the
following:

    


    (a)  The
total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have
the authority to issue is 51,000,000 shares, of which:

    


    (i)          50,000,000
shares shall be designated as Common Stock, having a par value of $.01 per share
(the "Common Stock"); and

    


    (ii)          1,000,000
shares shall be designated as Preferred Stock, having a par value of $.01 per
share.

    


    SECOND:  The
capital of the Corporation will not be reduced under or by reason of this
amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

    


    THIRD:  The
amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation set forth in
this Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted by the vote of the
stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be
signed by its duly authorized officer as of this 7th day of December,
2005.

    


    
      	
              UNIVERSAL
      INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
              By:

            	
              /s/ Bradley I. Meier

            
	 
      	
              Bradley
      I. Meier

            
	 
      	
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00794-CV

Walter Lee Hall, Jr., Appellant

v.

The Honorable J. David Phillips, in both his Official and Personal Capacities; The

Honorable Rosemary Lehmberg, in her Capacity as District Attorney in and for Travis

County; and The Honorable Greg Hamilton, in his Capacity as Sheriff in and for Travis

Co, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-10-003787, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Walter Lee Hall, Jr. filed a bankruptcy petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy

Court of the Western District of Texas on January 24, 2011. We abated the appeal on June 1, see

Tex. R. App. P. 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, ordering Hall to inform us within ten calendar days of the resolution

of the bankruptcy proceeding or another event that would allow us to reinstate the appeal, warning

him that his failure to provide such notice would result in the appeal’s dismissal for want of

prosecution. See id. R. 42.3. On July 15, we were informed by appellees that the bankruptcy had

been dismissed on the bankruptcy trustee’s motion and that Hall was barred from filing another

bankruptcy petition for two years. The bankruptcy court signed the order of dismissal on June 28,

but as of July 19, Hall had not informed this Court of the dismissal. We dismiss the appeal for want

of prosecution.
__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 21, 2011

2
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                         |   |   |   |
| Dated: October 17, 2011 |   |   |   | By:    | /s/   Eddie Vakser |
|                         |   |   |   |   | Eddie VakserChief Executive Officer |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________ __________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

d0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

144894

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144894

COA: 301186

Wayne CC: 09

- 024407

- FC

MARK GERALD ELLIOTT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Cour t, the application for leave to appeal the February 16, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Government Ethics

# AGENCY:

Office of Government Ethics (OGE).

# ACTION:

Notice of request for public comment.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) is providing notice of request for public comment on its draft Strategic Plan (Plan). The Plan describes OGE's priorities for the next five years. OGE will consider all comments received by the deadline. You may access the Plan at *www.oge.gov/​StrategicPlanFeedback,* or you may obtain a copy of the Plan by sending an email request to *OGEStrategicPlan@oge.gov.* You are also invited to share your thoughts on the Plan at a virtual town hall meeting on July 13, 2021 from 3-4p.m., EST or July 14, 2021 from 5:30-6:30 p.m., EST. If you plan to attend, please RSVP to *OGEStrategicPlan@oge.gov.*

# DATES:

All comments must be received by July 22, 2021.

# ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments by any of the following methods:

*Email: OGEStrategicPlan@oge.gov.*

*Mail:* U.S. Office of Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005-3917, Attention: Nicole Stein, OGE Strategic Plan.

*Instructions:* All submissions must include OGE's agency name and the words “Strategic Plan.” All comments, including attachments and other supporting materials, will become part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. Comments may be posted on OGE's website, *www.oge.gov.* Sensitive personal information, such as account numbers or Social Security numbers, should not be included. Comments generally will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nicole Stein, Chief, Agency Assistance Branch, U.S. Office of Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005-3917; Telephone (202) 482-9255; TTY: 800-877-8339; Email: *OGEStrategicPlan@oge.gov.*

Approved: July 1, 2021.

Emory Rounds,

Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics.

[FR Doc. 2021-14483 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6345-03-P
Exhibit 11
                           METRIKA SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                        Computation of Earnings per Share


                               Three Months Ended          Six Months Ended
                            ------------------------  -------------------------
                               June 28,     June 29,     June 28,      June 29,
                                   1997         1996         1997          1996
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Computation of Primary
   Earnings per Share:

 Net income (a)             $ 1,227,000  $   830,000  $ 1,942,000   $ 1,279,000
                            -----------  -----------  -----------   -----------

 Shares:
   Weighted average shares
     outstanding              6,068,932    5,000,000    6,018,382     5,000,000

   Add: Shares issuable
        from assumed
        issuance of private
        placement shares
        and the assumed
        exercise of options
        (as determined by
        the application of
        the treasury stock
        method)                       -      193,086        2,884       193,086
                            -----------  -----------  -----------   -----------
   Weighted average
     shares outstanding,
     as adjusted (b)          6,068,932    5,193,086    6,021,266     5,193,086
                            -----------  -----------  -----------   -----------
 Primary Earnings
   per Share (a) / (b)      $       .20  $       .16  $       .32   $       .25
                            ===========  ===========  ===========   ===========
#### In the Matter of John Hemphill, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[942 NYS2d 384]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner became involved in a physical altercation with a correction officer and repeatedly punched the officer despite several direct orders to stop. Another officer intervened and petitioner eventually ceased such conduct after he was placed in mechanical restraints. Petitioner was subsequently charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct and refusing a direct order. He was found guilty of the charges at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence, consisting of the misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony of the correction officers involved in the incident, supports the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Gardine v*Fischer, 87 AD3d 1187 [2011]; *Matter of Bridgeforth v Fischer,*78 AD3d 1401, 1401 [2010]). Petitioner’s contrary testimony that it was he who was assaulted by correction officers raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Malik v Bezio,*76 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2010]; *Matter of Reynoso v Fischer,*73 AD3d 1315, 1316 [2010]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and, to the extent they are properly before us, are without merit. Therefore, we find no reason to disturb respondent’s determination.

Rose, J.E, Malone Jr., Stein, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13b — 14(b) OF**

**THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EVIO, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I William Waldrop, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

|                  |        |                         |   |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date: August 14, 2018 | By:    | */s/ William Waldrop*   |        |
|                       |   | William Waldrop         |        |
|                       |   | Chief Executive Officer |        |
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Richard
Serbin, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/Anthony Bonelli
                                            -----------------
                                            Anthony Bonelli,
                                            Chief Executive Officer (Principal
                                            Executive Officer)

Dated: February 7, 2006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Earl JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-30036.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.*

Filed Jan. 9, 2009.

Joseph E. Thaggard, Assistant U.S., USHE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Evangelo Arvanetes, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendants Appellant.

Before GOODWIN, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*95MEMORANDUM **

Charles Earl Jackson appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(3) and 1153. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Jackson contends that the district court erred by applying a two-level vulnerable victim sentencing enhancement because it placed too much weight on the victim’s age. We conclude that the district court properly applied the vulnerable victim enhancement. *See United States v. Weischedel,*201 F.3d 1250, 1253-55 (9th Cir.2000).

Jackson also contends that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court did not consider mitigating factors and that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error, and that the sentence is substantively reasonable. *See United States v. Stoterau,*524 F.3d 988, 999-1002 (9th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Max W. Hillman, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of The HillmanCompanies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrantand we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: 3/26/04 /s/ Max W. Hillman  Max W. Hillman Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001029850
<NAME>                        LORAL ORION, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US-DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                               15,965
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        30,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                          3,279
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     89,520
<PP&E>                                              843,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (109,824)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,509,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               167,077
<BONDS>                                             974,821
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                          354,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,509,333
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     42,182
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        57,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (212)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   21,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (36,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            962
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (37,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                          (37,048)
<NET-INCOME>                                              0
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
ex10a.htm


    


    


    Exhibit
10(a)

    


    


    


    Consent of Ernst
& Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    


    


    We consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm” and to the
use of our reports dated (a) March 18, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
and (b) March 13, 2009, with respect to the financial statements of
Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, in Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to
the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-40937) pertaining to
Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, which is incorporated by reference
into Post-Effective Amendment No. 35.

    


                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young
LLP

     

    Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania

    December 2,
2009