alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soybean/maize Germplasm, Pathology, and Genetics Research: Urbana, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Midwest Area Urbana, Illinois Soybean/maize Germplasm, Pathology, and Genetics Research





- ARS News & Events
- AgResearch Magazine
- Image Gallery
- News

Newsheadline bar     ARS News Articles  Bioluminescence May Shine Light on Roundworm SecretsFeb 22, 2023Tender, Tasty Edamame Tough on Pests, DiseaseMay 09, 2022Bug Vacuum Captures Unidentified Flying Insects—and Valuable DataMay 28, 2020A New Tool for Identifying Key Soybean GenesFeb 18, 2014Breeding Ozone-Tolerant CropsAug 22, 2011


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-21-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (415)
<INVENTORY>                                     32,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,453
<PP&E>                                          32,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,822)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 338,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,850
<BONDS>                                        274,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   338,450
<SALES>                                         58,567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,567
<CGS>                                           38,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,534
<INCOME-TAX>                                       651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                883
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2019182EN.01002501.xml

| 27.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 25 March 2019 — B. O. L. v État belge

(Case C-250/19)

(2019/C 182/30)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: B. O. L.

Defendant: État belge

Questions referred

| 1. | In order to guarantee the effectiveness of EU law and not make it impossible to enjoy the right to family reunification which, according to the applicant, is conferred on her by Article 4 of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (1), must that provision be interpreted as meaning that the sponsor’s child is able to enjoy the right to family reunification where he becomes an adult during the court proceedings brought against the decision which refuses to grant him that right and was taken when he was still a minor?’ |
| --- | --- |

1.

In order to guarantee the effectiveness of EU law and not make it impossible to enjoy the right to family reunification which, according to the applicant, is conferred on her by Article 4 of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (1), must that provision be interpreted as meaning that the sponsor’s child is able to enjoy the right to family reunification where he becomes an adult during the court proceedings brought against the decision which refuses to grant him that right and was taken when he was still a minor?’

| 2. | Must Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 18 of Directive 2003/86/EC be interpreted as precluding an action for annulment, brought against the refusal to grant a right to family reunification to a minor child, being held to be inadmissible on the ground that the child became an adult during the court proceedings, since he is deprived of the opportunity for a judgment to be given in his action against that decision and his right to an effective remedy is infringed? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 18 of Directive 2003/86/EC be interpreted as precluding an action for annulment, brought against the refusal to grant a right to family reunification to a minor child, being held to be inadmissible on the ground that the child became an adult during the court proceedings, since he is deprived of the opportunity for a judgment to be given in his action against that decision and his right to an effective remedy is infringed?

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12.

---
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Soybean/maize Germplasm, Pathology, and Genetics Research: Urbana, IL
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    CareersSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




Soybean green stem syndrome can delay harvest
 Soybean aphid sucks sap from the plant
 Soybean sudden death syndrome caused by a toxin producing fungus


Mission


People Bartlett, Benjamin Bedford, Todd Clough, Steven Furr, Lezlie Gustin, Jeffrey Herman, Theresa Lagos-Kutz, Doris Mahan, Adam McCoppin, Nancy Moody, Eric Neece, David Sachs, Martin Tolbert, Joshua Yousef, Gad Zimmerman, Shane


Midwest Area   ADAM.MAHAN@USDA.GOV


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
Opinion issued April 30, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 8 - 0 0 6 3 9 - CV

——————————— LORUHAMAH DICKEY , Appellant

V. HARRIS COUNTY, CITY OF HOUST ON , HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM, HOUS TON INDEPENDENT SCHO OL DISTRICT , Appellee s

O n Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016 - 02269

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Loruhamah Dickey , proceeding pro se, timely filed a notice of appeal from the June 15, 2018 final judgment in this property tax case. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1.2

This Court’s March 19, 2019 Order struck the March 11, 2019 pro se appellant ’s brief as non - compliant and ordered appellant to file a compliant amended brief within 10 days . It also denied without prejudice appellees’ motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. T h en th is Court’s April 9, 2019 Order denied appellant’s construed motion for notice of removal to federal court and ordered her to file an amended brief that complied with Rule 38.1 within 10 days of that Order. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.1(a)

- (k), 38.9(a). Th e Order further notified a ppellant that, because appellees’ brief had been filed on March 15, 2019, th e Court m ight affirm the trial court’s judgment upon the appellees’ brief without examining the record if no appellant’s brief w ere timely filed

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)( 3 ). On April 8 and 25, 2019, the appellees filed a second and third motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. Appellant failed to timely file her amended brief. When an appellant fails to file a brief in a civil appeal, as here, the appellate court may: (1) dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution; (2) decline to dismiss the appeal and give furthe r direction to the case as it considers proper; or (3) regard an appellee’s brief as correctly presenting the case and affirm the trial court’s judgment on that brief without examining the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a). O n March 15, 2019, the appe llees filed a brief on the merits requesting that this Court affirm the trial court’s judgment. Because the appellees filed a brief on the merits, this3

Court accepts the appellees’ brief as correctly presenting the case and we affirm the judgment upon tha t brief without examining the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a) (3); Harkins v. Dever Nursing Home , 999 S.W.2d 571, 573 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (affirming trial court’s respective summary judgments based on appellees’ briefs alone without examining record, under Rule 38.8(a)(3), because appellants’ amended brief had not substantially complied with rules)

. Accordingly, w e affirm the trial court’s final judgment upon the appellees’ brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)( 3) , 4 3

. 2 ( a ) . We dismiss a ll pending motion s as
moot
. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices K ey es, Higley , and La n dau

.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A No. 1 of Americare
Health Scan,  Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Dr. Joseph P. D'Angelo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
   the company.

Date: October 10, 2008       /s/  Dr. Joseph P. D'Angelo
      ----------------      ---------------------------
                            Dr. Joseph P. D'Angelo, President, Chief
                            Executive Officer

      October 10, 2008      /s/  Robert Cano
      ----------------      --------------------
                            Robert Cano, Chief Financial Officer
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






Poster and Presentation Galleryheadline bar Services
               Downloadable Special Topic Posters and Documents
               Downloadable Scientific Posters
               Downloadable Slide Presentations


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35789-35790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-913-000.
    Applicants: Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: MCGP Updates to Tariff Contact 
Person to be effective 7/28/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/28/21.
    Accession Number: 20210628-5002.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-914-000.
    Applicants: Egan Hub Storage, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Egan Updates to Tariff Contact 
Person to be effective 7/28/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/28/21.
    Accession Number: 20210628-5003.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-915-000.
    Applicants: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Updates to Tariff Contact 
Person to be effective 7/28/2021.
    Filed Date: 6/28/21.
    Accession Number: 20210628-5034.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-916-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing TETLP OFO June 2021 Penalty 
Disbursement Report.
    Filed Date: 6/28/21.
    Accession Number: 20210628-5098.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/21.


[[Page 35790]]


    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 29, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-14373 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O . A P - 76, 420
EX PA R TE EP H R A I M LE E W I LSO N , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. W 9 7 - 7 4 9 5 3 - S ( A) I N T HE 2 8 2 J UDI CI AL DI S TR I CT COURT ND FROM DALLAS CO UNTY
P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u a n t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial court transmitt ed to this Court this application for writ of ha beas c orpus. Ex

pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 82 6 (T ex. C rim. App. 1967). Applica nt pleaded guilty

to ag g ravated robber y in exchang e for

seven y ea rs’ defer

red a djudication community supervision. He w as later
a dju dic a te d g uil ty and sent e nc e d to tw e nty y e a rs ’ i mpr iso nme nt. Th e F if thCourt of Ap pe a ls dismiss ed his appe al for w ant of jurisdiction. W ils on v . Stat e , No. 05-02-00163- CR (Tex. App. – Dallas, Nove mber 18, 2002)
. Applicant conte nds, int e r a lia , that his trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance , and that2

his plea of guilt y

was c aused by

counsel’s ine ffe ctiveness. The trial court he ld a hea ring , and has deter mined that trial counsel was ineffe ctive in that counsel failed to investigate, failed to interview
a wi tne ss w ho wa s ava ila

ble a nd wi lli ngto p ro vid e te sti mony that wo uld have e xone ra

te d App lic a nt, and er roneousl y ad v i sed Applica nt to plead g uilty . The trial c ourt finds that but for c ounsel’s defic ient perf

ormanc e, Applica

nt would not have plea ded g uilty but would have insisted on g oing to t ri a l. F ur the rm or e , th e tr ia l c ourt fi nd s th a t ha d App lic a nt g on e to t ri a l w ithc omp e te nt c ouns e l,
a nd ha d the te sti mony

of the wi tne ss i n q

ue sti on be e n p re se nte d, the jur

y wo uld have be e n unli ke ly to convict Applicant of

this offense. Applicant is entitled to relief . The judg ment in Cause No. W97-74953-S(A) f rom the 282 nd J udicial District Court of

Dallas County

is set aside, and A

pplicant i s rema

nded to the custody

of the She ri ff of Da lla s Co un ty

to a ns we r t he c ha rg e a g a ins t hi m. Copies of this opi n io n

s h a ll b e s e n t t o th e Texas Depar tment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: September

22, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
# C_2019103EN.01001701.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 21 January 2019 — BU v État belge

(Case C-35/19)

(2019/C 103/17)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BU

Defendant: État belge

Question referred

Does Article 38 § 1(4) of the C.I.R./92 infringe Article 45 et seq. (principle of free movement of workers) and Article 56 et seq. (principle of freedom to provide services) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in so far as it exempts disability allowances from tax only if those allowances are paid by the State Treasury, that is to say, by the Belgian State, in accordance with Belgian legislation, thereby giving rise to discrimination between taxpayers resident in Belgium who receive disability allowances paid by the Belgian State under Belgian legislation, which are exempt from tax, and taxpayers resident in Belgium who receive allowances intended to compensate for a disability paid by another Member State of the European Union, which are not exempt from tax?

---