alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 725 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 725

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
  coverage, as supplies associated with the injection of insulin, of 
 containment, removal, decontamination and disposal of home-generated 
    needles, syringes, and other sharps through a sharps container, 
   decontamination/destruction device, or sharps-by-mail program or 
         similar program under part D of the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2011

  Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
  coverage, as supplies associated with the injection of insulin, of 
 containment, removal, decontamination and disposal of home-generated 
    needles, syringes, and other sharps through a sharps container, 
   decontamination/destruction device, or sharps-by-mail program or 
         similar program under part D of the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Safe Needle Disposal 
Coverage Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF CONTAINMENT, REMOVAL, DECONTAMINATION AND DISPOSAL 
              OF HOME-GENERATED NEEDLES, SYRINGES, AND OTHER SHARPS 
              THROUGH A SHARPS CONTAINER, DECONTAMINATION/DESTRUCTION 
              DEVICE, OR SHARPS-BY-MAIL PROGRAM OR SIMILAR PROGRAM 
              UNDER MEDICARE PART D.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-2(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-102(e)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting after 
``regulations of the Secretary'' the following: ``and including devices 
approved for home use by the Food and Drug Administration for the safe 
and effective containment, removal, decontamination and disposal of 
home-generated needles, syringes, and other sharps through a sharps 
container, decontamination/destruction device, or sharps-by-mail 
program or similar program''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 1, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
AMENDMENT TO TECHNOLOGY PURCHASE AGREEMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT to Technology Purchase Agreement is made as of
the 15th day of September, 1999, by and between AMERICAN CARD
TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware corporation ("American Card") and
SOFTCHIP ISRAEL LTD., a corporation organized under the laws of
Israel ("SoftChip").

    WITNESSETH:

    WHEREAS, American Card and SoftChip are parties to a technology
purchase agreement dated as of March 7, 1998, as amended by
Amendments, dated August 17, 1998, October 29, 1998,  December 10,
1998, March 15, 1999 and June 15, 1999 (as amended the "Purchase
Agreement"); and

    WHEREAS, American Card will not be closing an initial public
offering of its securities (the "IPO") by September 15, 1999; and

    WHEREAS, SoftChip is willing to extend the date by which
American Card may purchase the technology pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement through December 31th, 1999 or the Closing Date as defined
below, whichever is earlier.

    NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

    1.   The definition of "Closing Date" in Section 1 of the
Purchase Agreement is hereby replaced by; '"Closing Date" shall mean
(i) December 31, 1999 or (ii) the closing of an initial public
offering of securities of the Buyer or (iii) the closing of
cumulative private placement equal or larger than the minimum
offering under the initial public offering or (iv)  closing a
combination of (ii) and/or of (iii) together equal or larger than
the minimum offering under the initial public offering.'

    2.   Except as amended hereby, the Purchase Agreement remains in
full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and
seals as of the day and year first above written.


Signed, Sealed, and Delivered
in the Presence of:             AMERICAN CARD TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                                 By:  /S/ RAYMOND FINDLEY, JR.

                                 ---------------------------------------
                                      Its President


                                SOFTCHIP ISRAEL LTD.


                                By: /S/ MICKEY COHEN

                                ----------------------------------

                                    Its Director
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James Hennen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




| | /s/ James Hennen                                  
| | --------------------------------------------------
| | James Hennen
Chief Financial Officer
July 27, 2007







---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Octavio GONZALEZ-CARRANZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-40060

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 22, 2011.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Joe Alfred Flores, I, Esq., Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Octavio Gonzalez-Carranza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Gonzalez-Carranza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:* National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; RFA DK20-025: Diabetes Research Centers (P30 Clinical Trial Optional).

*Date:* October 4-5, 2021.

*Time:* 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

*Agenda:* To review and evaluate grant applications.

*Place:* National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).

*Contact Person:* Najma S. Begum, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer,  Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7349, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8894, *begumn@niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 30, 2021. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-14416 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### WATERFORD ELECTRIC LIGHT, HEAT & POWER CO., Appellant, v. REED et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by the Waterford Electric Light, Heat & Power Company against Kate E. Reed and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with costs. See 47 Mise. Rep, 406, 94 N. Y. Supp. 551.

COCHRANE, J., not sitting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,209
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              81
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,750
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,640
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          35,730
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            35,810
<LOANS>                                        139,793
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,870
<DEPOSITS>                                     198,689
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,410
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,172
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 216,870
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,545
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,685
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   292
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,522
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,406
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,406
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,116
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,436
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         955
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.80
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,278
<LOANS-PAST>                                       116
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,181
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,356
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       85
<RECOVERIES>                                        12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,328
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,328
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,050
        


</TABLE>
#### COONAN v. HAMBURG-AMERICA1S PACKET CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Appeal (No._ 1)

from _ Special Term, Kings _ County. Action by William H. Coonan against the Hamburg-American Packet Company From certain orders of the Special Term, defendant appeals. Orders affirmed. See, also 145 App. Div. 941, 130 N. Y. Supp. 1108. A Leonard Brougham, for appellant. Fredericl S. Lyke, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

While the position of the defendant may be technically correct, in viev of the fact that the amended complaint has been served, has been demurred to, and that ai appeal from the decision upon that demurrer is now pending before this court, the questions involved _ on_ this appeal are academic. Substantial justice may be accomplished by affirming the orders reviewed by this appeal, without costs. If defendant shall within five days procure a retaxation of costs, as directed by Mr. Justice Garretson, and if within five days thereafter the amount of such costs is not paid by plaintiff to defendant, application may be made by defendant to the Special Term to stay all proceedings in this action, or "to dismiss the complaint, as it may be advised.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 608 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 608

 To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing licenses and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2011

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing licenses and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maritime Lien Reform Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON MARITIME LIENS ON FISHING LICENSE AND LICENSE 
              DESCRIPTION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter I of chapter 313 of title 46, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing license and 
              license description
    ``(a) In General.--This chapter--
            ``(1) does not establish a maritime lien on a license 
        that--
                    ``(A) authorizes a person or use of a vessel to 
                engage in fishing; and
                    ``(B) is issued under State or Federal law; and
            ``(2) does not authorize any civil action to enforce a 
        maritime lien on such a license.
    ``(b) Fishing License Described.--A fishing license--
            ``(1) is governed solely by the State or Federal law under 
        which it was issued; and
            ``(2) is not included in the whole of a vessel or as an 
        appurtenance or intangible of a vessel for any purpose.
    ``(c) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in subsections 
(a) and (b) shall be construed as imposing any limitation upon the 
authority of the Secretary of Commerce to modify, suspend, revoke, or 
sanction any Federal fishery license issued by the Secretary of 
Commerce or to bring a civil action to enforce such modification, 
suspension, revocation, or sanction.''.
    (b) Table of Sections Amendment.--The table of sections at the 
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 31309 the following:

``31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing license and license 
                            description.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Transnational Criminal Organizations

                    On July 24, 2011, by Executive Order 13581, the President declared a national emergency with respect to transnational criminal organizations pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the activities of significant transnational criminal organizations.                

On March 15, 2019, by Executive Order 13863, the President took additional steps to deal with the national emergency with respect to significant transnational criminal organizations in view of the evolution of these organizations as well as the increasing sophistication of their activities, which threaten international political and economic systems and pose a direct threat to the safety and welfare of the United States and its citizens, and given the ability of these organizations to derive revenue through widespread illegal conduct, including acts of violence and abuse that exhibit a wanton disregard for human life as well as many other crimes enriching and empowering these organizations.

The activities of significant transnational criminal organizations continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For these reasons, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13581 of July 24, 2011, under which additional steps were taken in Executive Order 13863 of March 15, 2019, must continue in effect beyond July 24, 2021. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to significant transnational criminal organizations declared in Executive Order 13581.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2021-14814

Billing code 3295-F1-P
**Exhibit 31 (ii)**

 

**RULE 13a-14(a)CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Sonya E. Scott, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: August 9, 2004 |                    |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                 | /s/ Sonya E. Scott      |   |
|                 | Sonya E. Scott          |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----