alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JACQUELINE K. RIBES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1320

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Frederick R. Hardt, Judge.

Michael Robert Ufferman of Michael 

Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714560
<NAME> US AIRWAYS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             720
<SECURITIES>                                       721
<RECEIVABLES>                                      607<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,760
<PP&E>                                           5,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,708
<BONDS>                                          1,970
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,856
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,469
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    745
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                445
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       445
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
<F2>EPS calculations are not relevant because US Airways, Inc. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of US Airways Group, Inc.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Minera Andes Inc. (the Corporation), on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Allen V. Ambrose, President of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                   |  |     |  |                      |  |                 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------
|                        |  | MINERA ANDES INC.
|                        |  |                   | 
|Date: November 20, 2006 |  |                   |  | By: |  | /s/ Allen V. Ambrose
|                        |  |                   |  |     |  |                      |  | Allen V. Ambrose
|                        |  |                   |  |     |  |                      |  | President
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Eddie Vakser (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ended    December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael
D. Fowler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Dated:
       April 14 , 2009
              
              
              
              By:
              
              /s/ Eddie VakserEddie
      Vakser
                Chief
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 533 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 533

  To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2011

 Mr. Grassley (for himself and Mr. Lee) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY ACCOUNTABILITY.

    (a) Sanctions Under Rule 11.--Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``may'' and inserting 
        ``shall'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Rule 5'' and all that 
        follows through ``motion.'' and inserting ``Rule 5.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ``situated'' and all that 
        follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting 
        ``situated, and to compensate the parties that were injured by 
        such conduct. Subject to the limitations in paragraph (5), the 
        sanction shall consist of an order to pay to the party or 
        parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred as a 
        direct result of the violation, including reasonable attorneys' 
        fees and costs. The court may also impose additional 
        appropriate sanctions, such as striking the pleadings, 
        dismissing the suit, or other directives of a nonmonetary 
        nature, or, if warranted for effective deterrence, an order 
        directing payment of a penalty into the court''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
to bar or impede the assertion or development of new claims, defenses, 
or remedies under Federal, State, or local laws, including civil rights 
laws.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 128 (Thursday, July 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36186-36187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will still be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, August 11, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(718) 834-2203.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Wednesday, August 11, 
2021, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Robert Rosalia. For more information please contact 
Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 834-2203, or write TAP 
Office, 2 Metrotech Center, 100 Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include various IRS issues.


[[Page 36187]]


    Dated: July 1, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-14513 Filed 7-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sharon M. Helstein, Appellant.

[944 NYS2d 791]—

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered October 25, 2010, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree.

Defendant was charged in a seven-count indictment with various crimes arising from the theft of property from her employer. In satisfaction thereof, she pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the second degree and was to be sentenced to no more than 3 to 9 years in prison. A civil judgment had been entered against defendant in the amount of $349,000 in connection with the theft, and the plea agreement included a provision that defendant would make restitution in such amount. County Court advised defendant that if she paid a substantial portion of the restitution prior to sentencing, she might not have to serve time in state prison. The court adjourned sentencing to give defendant time to make restitution. Ultimately, four months after defendant entered her guilty plea when it became apparent that she was unable to make significant progress in her restitution payments, defendant was sentenced to 3 to 9 years in prison. She now appeals.

Defendant claims that the sentence is harsh and excessive. Based upon our review of the record, we disagree. Defendant embezzled a significant amount of money from her employer and has a prior conviction for a similar type of crime. She was given ample opportunity to demonstrate her ability to significantly reduce the amount of restitution owed in order to avoid prison time, to no avail. In view of this, the fact that the sentence imposed was agreed to by defendant under the terms of the plea agreement and upon review of the record, we find no extraordinary circumstances nor any abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice *(see People v Merchant,*79 AD3d 1526, 1526-1527 [2010]; *People v Birch,*56 AD3d 808, 809 [2008]).

*1565Peters, EJ., Mercure, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Asset Management Advisory Committee (“AMAC”) will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

                        The meeting will be conducted by remote means. Members of the public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# STATUS: 

                        The meeting will begin at 11:00 a.m. and will be open to the public by webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

On June 15, 2021, the Commission issued notice of the meeting (Release No. 34-92179), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to AMAC. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.

The meeting will include a discussion of matters in the asset management industry relating to: (1) The ESG, Diversity & Inclusion, and Private Investments Subcommittees, including potential recommendations from those Subcommittees; and (2) the Evolution of Advice Subcommittee, including a panel discussion.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: June 30, 2021.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-14381 Filed 6-30-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### John J. Quinlan, Respondent, *v.*Emily A. Stratton et al., Appellants.

(Argued June 16, 1890;

decided June 24, 1890.)

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made February 3, 1890, which affirmed an order of Special Term, denying a motion for a new trial.

*Samuel W. Judson*for appellants.

*Frank F. O’Brien*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 700 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

treatment of certain farming business machinery and equipment as 5- 

year property for purposes of depreciation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 31, 2011 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. MORAN, Ms. STABENOW, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the treatment of certain farming business machinery and equipment as 5-year property for purposes of 

depreciation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FARMING BUSINESS MACHINERY AND 

4 EQUIPMENT TREATED AS 5-YEAR PROPERTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (vii) of section 

6 168(e)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘, and which is placed in service be8 fore January 1, 2010’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 700 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

3 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Timothy J. Dodd, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 
| Date:  October 29, 2003 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    |
|                    |   | /s/  Timothy J. Dodd |   |
|                    |   |
|                    | Timothy  J. Dodd |
|                    | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### JOHN MATITS, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

See same case below: 59 *N. J. Super.*373.

*Messrs. Oppenheim & Oppenheim*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Gelman & Gelman, Mr. Leon A. Consoles, Mr. Charles C. Shenier*and *Mr. Kent*A. *Losche*for the respondents.

May 4, 1960.

Granted.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3109

THOMAS S. FITZGERALD,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

Myrrel C. Hendricks, Jr. , Gebhardt & Associates, LLP, of Washington, DC,

argued for petitioner.

Eric P. Bruskin , Attorney, Commercial Litigati on Branch, Civil Division, United

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on

the brief were Tony West , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director,

Reginald T. Blades, Jr. , Assistant Director, and Robert E. Chandler , Trial Attorney.

Appealed from: Merit S ystems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3109

THOMAS S. FITZGERALD,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board

in CASE NO(S). PH0752080268-I-1.

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MAYER, LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 6, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Systematic Entomology Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    ECMU
                    SEL Twitter FeedSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Beltsville, Maryland (BARC) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Systematic Entomology Laboratory Docs







SEL Addresses for Urgent Submissions Listed by Taxonheadline bar AcariBlattodeaCollembola1Embioptera1Hemiptera:      Sternorrhycha  IsopteraOrthopteraPsocoptera1Mantodea1Phasmatodea1Thysanoptera
Communications & Taxonomic Services UnitUSDA-ARS-Systematic Entomology LaboratoryBuilding 003, Room 328, BARC-West10300 Baltimore AvenueBeltsville, MD 20705-2350   ColeopteraDipteraHemiptera:       Auchenorrhyncha      HeteropteraHymenopteraLepidoptera
All other orders should be sent to the Beltsville Location
Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDAc/o National Museum of Natural HistoryNHB 16810th & Constitution Ave., NWWashington, DC 200042
 1 No specialist available, so we accept these orders only as Urgents (i.e. no Prompts or Routines)2 Use this ZIP code only for packages shipped via FedEx?. It is the code that would map to the street address of the National Museum of Natural History.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov