alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.4**
I, Fernando Ramos Nóbrega, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Vale Overseas Limited;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
          Date: June 10, 2004                     /s/ Fernando Ramos Nóbrega   Name:  Fernando Ramos Nóbrega   Title:  Director and Principal Financial Officer
# C_2019246EN.01001601.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/16

---

Action brought on 24 May 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-413/19)

(2019/C 246/16)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Kocjan and K. Talabér-Ritz)

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by having limited the obligation to demonstrate energy performance to buildings owned or used by public authorities, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 13(2) of the Directive on the energy performance of buildings; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by having limited the obligation to demonstrate energy performance to buildings owned or used by public authorities, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligation under Article 13(2) of the Directive on the energy performance of buildings; (1)

| — | order the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Under Article 13(2) of Directive (EU) 2010/31/EU, the Member States must require that where a total useful floor area over 500 m2 of a building for which an energy performance certificate has been issued in accordance with Article 12(1) is frequently visited by the public, the energy performance certificate is displayed in a prominent place clearly visible to the public. Since the Republic of Slovenia has imposed that requirement only for buildings owned or used by public bodies, the Commission has decided to bring an action before the Court.

---

(1)  Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (OJ 2010 L 153, p. 13).

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.3**




Written
      Statement of Principal Accounting Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christine M. Carriker,
      Secretary/Trearuer and Chief Administrative Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of December 31, 2006 and results of operations for
      the year ended December 31, 2006 of the Company and its
      subsidiaries.






/s/
      Christine M. Carriker





Christine
      M. Carriker


Secretary/Treasurer
      and Chief Administrative Officer


(Principal
      Accounting Officer)





February
      6, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Companle call
      volume.


8.
      Strategic advice and other customary IR services.
#### In re Christopher G.

*Robert M. Cósale,*in support of the petition.

*Carolyn K. Longstreth,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided January 18, 1990

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 101, is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                      1,350,795                 514,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,350,795                 514,500
<CGS>                                          702,557                 442,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,612,684               3,788,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,964,446)             (3,716,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,964,446)             (3,716,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,750,099)             (3,532,971)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.90)                   (.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.90)                   (.95)


</TABLE>
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Environmental Microbial & Food Safety Laboratory: Beltsville, MD
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    About Us
                        Mission, Facilities, and Expertise
                                    Five Appropriated Projects
                                    Research Staff (by project group)Search small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






docsheadline bar Environmental Transport
               Sensing Technologies
               Visitor Information
               Main Projects
               Environmental Research to Improve Food Safety - a film
               Mission Facilities and Expertise
               Project Staff


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
#### Robert Lee HARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Harley G. LAPPIN, Individually and in their Official Capacity under the Color of Law; Karen White, Regional Director; Al Haynes, Warden of U.S.P. Hazelton; Duke Terrell, Warden of U.S.P. Leavenworth; A.W. Jett, Associate Warden of U.S.P. Leavenworth; G. Drennan, Hospital Administrator of U.S.P. Leavenworth; Boyle, Hospital Administrator of U.S.P. Hazelton; McCullum, Dr.—Clinical Director of U.S.P. Leavenworth; Unknown Physician’s Assistant, Federal Bureau of Prisons Employee and is sued in his personal capacity; Bill Carey, Lieutenant—Federal Bureau of Prisons Employee and is sued in his personal capacity; Unknown Federal Bureau of Prisons Employee, and is sued in his personal capacity, Defendants—Appellees.

*719No. 08-7817.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 11, 2008.

Decided: Dec. 18, 2008.

Robert Lee Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting his motion for an extension of time to file a response to the magistrate judge’s recommendation in his underlying action pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Harris seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>




                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald B. Witmer, Chief Executive Officer of Home Director, Inc., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Home Director, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 15, 2003


By:      /S/ Donald B. Witmer
         --------------------
         Donald B. Witmer
         Chief Executive Officer

                                       19


<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Utica Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, and Susan J. Walter, as Administratrix of the Estate of Fred Walter, Deceased, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Trial Term (Walsh, Jr., J.), entered August 7, 1984 in Fulton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, pursuant to CPLR 7503, to stay arbitration between the parties.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Martin MERCADO-GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40506

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 7, 2009.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Martin Mercado-Garza, McAJ.len, TX, pro se.

*140Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Martin Mercado-Garza (Mercado) pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess, with the intent to distribute, more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. He was sentenced to 87 months of imprisonment and a four-year term of supervised release.

Mercado argues that the district court, in determining his sentence, improperly considered prior arrests for which no conviction resulted. He refers this court, however, only to instances where the district court considered his four prior convictions. He does not contest the validity of those convictions. As these arrests culminated in convictions, this argument lacks merit.

Mercado contends that the district court erred in adding two points to his criminal history score, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(d), based on the fact that, at the time he committed the instant offense, he was on probation for a Washington forgery conviction. He maintains that his probationary period was extended solely due to his failure to pay a fine and that it was therefore improper to use that probationary period to apply § 4Al.l(d).

We have conducted a de novo review of the district court’s application of § 4Al.l(d). *See United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez,*517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir.2008). We need not address Mercado’s argument because the application of § 4Al.l(d) was supported by the fact that, at the time Mercado committed the instant offense, he was on probation following an Oregon kidnapping conviction as he had absconded from supervision on that probation term. Mercado has made no argument with regard to his Oregon kidnapping conviction or the district court’s use thereof to apply § 4Al.l(d) in calculating his guidelines sentencing range.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
# C_2019213EN.01001601.xml

| 24.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Torino (Italy) lodged on 11 April 2019 — Techbau SpA v Azienda Sanitaria Locale AL

(Case C-299/19)

(2019/C 213/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Techbau SpA

Defendant: Azienda Sanitaria Locale AL

Question referred

Does Article 2(1) of Directive 2000/35/EC (1) preclude a national provision, such as Article 2(1)(a) of Legislative Decree No 231 of 9 October 2002, which excludes works contracts, whether public or private, and specifically public works contracts within the meaning of Directive 93/37/EEC, (2) from the concept of ‘commercial transaction’ — defined as contracts that ‘lead, exclusively or primarily, to the delivery of goods or the provision of services in exchange for remuneration’ — and therefore from the scope of that directive?

---

(1)  Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions (OJ 2000 L 200, p. 35).

(2)  Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 54).

---