alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Katonica et al., Appellants, v Town of Kent et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from water contamination, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Beisheim, J.), dated August 19,1983, which, upon the motion of the defendants Putnam County and Putnam County Board of Health to dismiss the complaint as against them for nonjoinder of the State of New York as a necessary party, dismissed the complaint as against all defendants “without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to pursue their claim against the defendants in the Court of Claims”.

Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. *(See, Baisley v Town of Kent,*111 AD2d 299.) Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
32.4**
 
 Written
Statement of Principal Accounting Officer Furnished Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 as
Adopted by
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christine M. Carriker,
Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 
 (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition as of December 31, 2004 and results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company and its
subsidiaries.
 
 ****Date: March 30,
2005
    By:
    /s/ Christine M.
      CarrikerName: Christine M. CarrikerTitle:  Senior Vice
      President and Chief Administrative Officer
      (Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Companle call
volume.
 8.
Strategic advice and other customary IR services.
EXHIBIT 10.6

                               TERM LOAN AGREEMENT

Party A (hereinafter referred to as the "Lender"):Tianjin Tianshi Biological
Development Co.,Ltd.

Party B (hereinafter referred to as the "Borrower"):Tianjin Tianshi Biological
Engineering Co.,Ltd.

The lender and the Borrower have reached and signed a loan agreement which
should be observed by both parties.

     1.   The Lender agrees to make a loan of RMB 200 million
          ((Yen)200,000,000.00) to the Borrower.

     2.   The term of the loan agreement is from January 1, 2006 to March 31,
          2006.

     3.   The loan is for short-term loan and non-interest bearing.

     4.   The Borrower guarantees to repay the loan by March 31, 2006, and terms
          of the loan agreement shall not be breached.

     5.   The Lender can call the loan back whenever it is necessary.

     6.   Upon the approval by the lender the Borrower can pay off the loan
          before March 31, 2006.


The Lender:                                The Borrower:
Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development     Tianjin Tianshi Biological Engneering
Co.,Ltd                                    Co.,Ltd


By     /s/ Jinyuan Li                      By     /s/ Baolan Li
       -------------------------------            ------------------------------
Title: General Manager                     Title: General Manager
       -------------------------------            ------------------------------

January 1, 2006                            January 1, 2006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alex JULCA, also known as El Diablo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20682

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 28, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David Adler, Bellaire, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Aex Juica was convicted of one count of conspiracy to harbor, conceal, or shield from detection aliens and three counts of aiding and abetting the harboring, concealing, or shielding from detection aliens for the purpose of private financial gain in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iii), (v)(I), (v)(II), (B)(i). Juica challenges the 105-month term of imprisonment imposed by the district court, contending that the district court reversibly erred by applying a four-level enhancement for serious bodily injury pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(7)(B), which was based on evidence that several aliens were physically beaten and sexually abused while they were detained. Juica contends that there was insufficient evidence to establish that any beatings resulted in serious bodily injury as that term is defined under the Sentencing Guidelines. Juica further argues that even though sexual abuse constitutes serious bodily injury, the conduct should not be attributed to him in this case because it was not reasonably foreseeable.

Juica did not argue in the district court that the physical beatings did not satisfy the definition of “serious bodily injury.” Thus, we review this issue for plain error. *See United States v. Cabral-Castillo,*35 F.3d 182, 188-89 (5th Cir.1994). The determination of “serious bodily injury” is a factual determination. *United States v. Garzar-Robles,*627 F.3d 161, 169 (5th Cir.2010); *see also United States v. Price,*149 F.3d 352, 353 (5th Cir.1998) (holding that the severity of an injury in a different guidelines context is a question of fact). The record as a whole supports a finding of “serious bodily injury.” *See Garzar-Robles,*627 F.3d at 169. As we affirm on this basis, we need not reach Julca’s argu*917ment that the sexual abuse committed by-other members of the conspiracy was not reasonably foreseeable.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 10.14 12.31.2014 10-K








Exhibit 10.14


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


In accordance with Section 7.01 of the Albemarle Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 3.01(d) of the Plan is amended to change all references therein to “December 31, 2010” to read “December 31, 2011” instead.




		
	2.
	This First Amendment shall be effective as of December 1, 2010.


    
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation by its duly authorized officer and with its seal affixed, has caused these presents to be signed as of December 1, 2010.


ALBEMARLE CORPORATION


	
		
	By:
	/s/ Darian Rich
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Howard Root, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/    Howard Root                              
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | Howard RootChief Executive OfficerApril 21, 2006

---
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Eric N. Person

*Hubert J. Santos,*in support of the petition.

*Harry Weller,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided January 2, 1990

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 115, is granted, limited to the following issues:

> “1. May the state, in a criminal prosecution, require a defense witness to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination in open court, and may it use such invocation and subsequent waiver as a basis for impeaching the witness and for adverse comment in its summation?

> “2. If the trial court’s ruling to permit such conduct was erroneous, was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the error was harmless?”
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Plant, Soil and Nutrition Research: Ithaca, NY
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        


                    Research Units
                        Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health
                                    Emerging Pests and Pathogens ResearchSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us




ARS Home Northeast Area Ithaca, New York Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health Plant, Soil and Nutrition Research People





- Research
- Selected Publications
- Personal Bio
- Curriculum Vitae
- USDA-ARS Trace Minerals & Nutrition Unit
- Cornell University - Department of Food Science

Elad Takoheadline bar /ARSUserFiles/46177/elad/Elad_Tako_photo.JPG
 Plant, Soil and Nutrition ResearchPhone: 1-607-255-5434Fax: 1-607-255-1132Room 227 Robert W Holley Center, USDA-ARS538 Tower RoadIthaca, NY 14853-2901
 ProjectsNo projects listed for this employee.  PublicationsNo publications listed for this employee.  ARS News ArticlesNo news articles listed for this employee.


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00519 - CR

DEBRA FULLER FABULUJ E APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRI CT COURT NO. 2 OF TA RRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Debra Fuller Fabuluje pled guilty to felony theft, and the trial court sentenced her to fifteen months’ confinement in jail. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as

counse l and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel avers that, in

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California 2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the rec ord demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 3 Appellant declined to file a pro se response to the Anders brief , and the State likewise declined to file a brief. After an appellant’s court

- appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that an appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders , this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record to see if there is any arguable ground that may be raised on her behalf. 4 Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 5 Because Appellant entered an open plea of guilty, our independent review for potential error is limited to potential jurisdictional defects, the voluntariness of
h er plea, error that is not independent of and supports the jud gment of guilt, and error occurring after entry of the guilty plea. 6

2 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

3 See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510

– 11 & n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

4 See id. at 511.

5 See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

6 See Monre al v. State , 99 S.W.3d 615, 619

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003), Young v. State , 8 S.W.3d 656, 666

– 67 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).3 We have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the appellate record. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the appellate record that arguably might support this appeal. 7 Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT , J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: October 17, 2013

7 See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2267 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2267

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain ion exchange resin powder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2005

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain ion exchange resin powder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN POWDER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.07.12       Ion Exchange       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         resin powder                                                       31/2008
                         comprised of a
                         copolymer of
                         methacrylic acid
                         cross-linked with
                         divinylbenzene,
                         in the hydrogen
                         ionic form, dried
                         to less than 5%
                         moisture (CAS No.
                         50602-21-6)(provi
                         ded for in
                         subheading
                         3914.00.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37166-37167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14921]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Approaches to Effective Therapeutic Management of Pain for People 
With Sickle Cell Disease

AGENCY: National Institutes of Health, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This NCCIH/NHLBI-led Trans-NIH workshop on Sickle Cell Disease 
Pain aims to explore critical gaps and research challenges, as well as 
to brainstorm potential solutions for this understudied pain condition 
in a highly underserved population. This fits into the NIH mission of 
seeking fundamental knowledge to enhance health.

DATES: The Meeting will be held on July 21-22, 2021, from 11:30 a.m. to 
5:30 p.m. (ET).

ADDRESSES: This workshop will be videocast.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this 
meeting, see https://www.nccih.nih.gov/news/events/approaches-to-effective-therapeutic-management-of-pain-for-people-with-sickle-cell-disease or contract Dr. Inna Belfer, Division of Extramural Research, 
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone: 240-422-
0636, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#127b7c7c733c70777e747760527c7b7a3c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aec7c0c0cf80cccbc2c8cbdceec0c7c680c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Public Health Service 
Act 42 U.S.C. 287c-21 et seq. This workshop is led by the National 
Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) and the 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in collaboration with 
the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development (NICHD), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National 
Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), National 
Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), and National 
Institute of Nursing Research (NINR). The workshop is free and open

[[Page 37167]]

to the public. The workshop will be livestreamed, and the video will be 
archived. You can register for this meeting at https://www.eventbrite.com/e/trans-nih-workshop-on-sickle-cell-disease-pain-tickets-154427600109.

Helene M. Langevin,
Director, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, 
National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2021-14921 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Brockington, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 823]

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank E Geraci, Jr., J.), entered September 21, 2010. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining *1434that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 *et seq.).*Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level *(see People v Ratcliff,*53 AD3d 1110 [2008], *lv denied 11*NY3d 708 [2008]). “In any event, that contention lacks merit inasmuch as defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances justifying a downward departure” *(People v Regan,*46 AD3d 1434, 1435 [2007]; see *Ratcliff,*53 AD3d 1110). Present — Centra, J.E, Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

N o. 04

- 17

- 00725

- CV

John RICHMOND

, Appellant

v.

VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT) , Duly Authorized Agent for the Secretary

of Veterans Affairs,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CV

- 03985

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of

this appeal are ass essed against appellant.

SIGNED January 17, 2018.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice
#### STEIN, Appellant, v. STEIN, Respondent, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 22, 1912.)

Action by Henry B. Stein against Charles A. Stein, impleaded with others. H. Swain, for appellant. A. I. Sire, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
#### John Galwey et al., Respondents, *v.*Jacob D. Nordlinger, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

(Argued June 11, 1890;

decided June 24, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made January 28, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*Joseph A. Shoudy*for appellant.

*B. F. Einsteim,*for respondents.

Agree to affirm on opinion of Daniels, J., below.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.