alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Isaacs K. Li, certify that:

1.   have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Weston Technologies
Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2004;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

    (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.



Date: March 12, 2005


By:/s/ Isaacs K. Li
--------------------------
 Isaacs K. Li, CFO
(principal accounting officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas N. Adams, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    Thomas N. Adams      
|Thomas N. Adams             
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     
|                            
|March 30, 2005
#### VILLAGE OF FT. EDWARD v. HUDSON VALLEY RY. CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 13, 1907.)

Action by the village of Ft. Edward against the Hudson Valley Railway Company and another.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the ground that the defendants have not complied with section 53 of the public service commission law (Laws 1907, p. 920, c. 429).
# C_2019187EN.01004001.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/40

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 28 February 2019 — PJ v QK

(Case C-195/19)

(2019/C 187/44)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel București

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PJ

Defendant: QK

Questions referred

| 1. | Are the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM), established by Commission Decision 2006/928/EC of 13 December 2006, (1) and the requirements laid down in the reports prepared in the context of that mechanism binding on Romania? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM), established by Commission Decision 2006/928/EC of 13 December 2006, (1) and the requirements laid down in the reports prepared in the context of that mechanism binding on Romania?

| 2. | Do Article 67(1) TFEU and both the first sentence of Article 2 TEU and the first sentence of Article 9 TEU preclude national legislation establishing a section of the prosecution office which has exclusive jurisdiction to investigate any type of offence committed by judges or prosecutors? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do Article 67(1) TFEU and both the first sentence of Article 2 TEU and the first sentence of Article 9 TEU preclude national legislation establishing a section of the prosecution office which has exclusive jurisdiction to investigate any type of offence committed by judges or prosecutors?

| 3. | Does the principle of the primacy of European law, as enshrined in the judgment of 15 July 1964, Costa, 6/64, EU:C:1964:66, and by subsequent settled case-law of the Court of Justice, preclude national legislation which allows a politico-judicial institution, such as the Curtea Constituțională a României (Romanian Constitutional Court), to infringe the aforementioned principle by means of decisions which are not open to appeal? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the principle of the primacy of European law, as enshrined in the judgment of 15 July 1964, Costa, 6/64, EU:C:1964:66, and by subsequent settled case-law of the Court of Justice, preclude national legislation which allows a politico-judicial institution, such as the Curtea Constituțională a României (Romanian Constitutional Court), to infringe the aforementioned principle by means of decisions which are not open to appeal?

---

(1)  Commission Decision of 13 December 2006 establishing a mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption (OJ 2006 L 354, p. 56).

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, Principal Financial Officer of New Jersey
Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: March 14, 2011

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCHFred W. Brackebusch,
Principal Financial Officer

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*The President, Managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 15, 1890;

decided April 29, 1890.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon an order made December 11, 1889, on a controversy submitted.

*David Willcox*for appellant.

*Ghcurles F. Tabor, Attorney-General,*for .respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur, Peckham J.. not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.
No. 75-7011.

#### Foster *v.*Estelle, Corrections Director.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Hal M. Krisbergh, the Chief Executive Officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Form 10-Q of WorldGate Communications, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "June 30, 2002 Form 10-Q"), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the June 30, 2002 Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of WorldGate Communications, Inc.

|Dated: 8/12/02 |  |  |  | /s/HAL M. KRISBERGHHal M. Krisbergh
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
# C_2019280EN.01002302.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Ostrowie Wielkopolskim (Poland) lodged on 15 May 2019 — Powiat Ostrowski v Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny z siedzibą w Warszawie

(Case C-383/19)

(2019/C 280/31)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Ostrowie Wielkopolskim

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Powiat Ostrowski

Defendant: Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny z siedzibą w Warszawie

Questions referred

| 1) | Must Article 3 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, (1) be interpreted as meaning that the obligation to take out civil liability motor insurance extends even to situations in which a local government authority — a district — has acquired, on the basis of a court decision, title to a vehicle which is not capable of being driven, is on private property in the form of a guarded car park not on the public highway, and is to be destroyed in accordance with the wishes of its owner? |
| --- | --- |

1)

Must Article 3 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, (1) be interpreted as meaning that the obligation to take out civil liability motor insurance extends even to situations in which a local government authority — a district — has acquired, on the basis of a court decision, title to a vehicle which is not capable of being driven, is on private property in the form of a guarded car park not on the public highway, and is to be destroyed in accordance with the wishes of its owner?

| 2) | Or must it be interpreted as meaning that, in such circumstances, the local government authority, as the owner of the vehicle, is not obliged to take out insurance, without prejudice to the liability of the fund towards injured third parties? |
| --- | --- |

2)

Or must it be interpreted as meaning that, in such circumstances, the local government authority, as the owner of the vehicle, is not obliged to take out insurance, without prejudice to the liability of the fund towards injured third parties?

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 263, p. 11.

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17005 and #17006; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-00167]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of FLORIDA dated 06/29/2021. *Incident:*
                         Surfside Building Collapse. *Incident Period:*
                         06/24/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 06/29/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         08/30/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/29/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Miami-Dade. *Contiguous Counties:* Florida: Broward, Collier, Monroe. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.625Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.760Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.880Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17005 U and for economic injury is 17006 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-14305 Filed 7-2-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Howard Root, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                         /s/ Howard Root
                         -----------------------------------------------
                         Howard Root
                         Chief Executive Officer and
                         Acting Chief Financial Officer
                         October 24, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Gaskin, Appellant.

[942 NYS2d 883] —

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), rendered January 21, 2011, convicting him of driving while intoxicated, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the Supreme Court’s denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; *People v Brathwaite,*263 AD2d 89, 91 [2000]; *see also People v Pena,*73 AD3d 1216 [2010]; *People v DeAngelo,*40 AD3d 656 [2007]; *People v Munford,*37 AD3d 855 [2007]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Statement



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Sonic Foundry, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|Dated: | May 11, 2004
|------ | ------------



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Rimas P. Buinivicius
|By:    |  | Rimas P. Buinivicius    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Kenneth A. Minor    
|By:    |  | Kenneth A. Minor        
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Sean Stover, Chief Financial Officer of NextMedia Operating, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NextMedia Operating,
Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions based upon the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2004 |  | /s/  Sean Stover              
|                     |  | Name: Sean Stover             
|                     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

CLARENCE TYRONE TAYLOR, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 501 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Memorandum and 

Order of the Superior Court at No. 1090 

MDA 2014 entered on June 2, 2015, 

affirming the Judgment of Sentence of 

the Lancaster County Court of Common 

Pleas at No. CP-36-CR-0000785-2013 

entered on May 29, 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is 

REMANDED for proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. Lutz-Morrison, ___ 

A.3d ___, 2016 WL 4273555 (Pa. Aug. 15, 2016). 

DECIDED: October 20, 2016