alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.7
                               TERM LOAN AGREEMENT

Party A (hereinafter referred to as the "Lender"): Tianjin Tianshi Biological
Development Co., Ltd.

Party B (hereinafter referred to as the "Borrower"): Tianjin Tianshi Biological
Engineering Co., Ltd.

The Lender and the Borrower have reached and signed a loan agreement which
should be observed by both parties.

In order to support the business development of the Borrower, the Lender agrees
to extend the loan agreement that was signed on June 29, 2006, and makes the
following according amendments:

     1.   The amount of the loan: RMB 200 million ((yen)200,000,000.00);
     2.   The term of the loan agreement: from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007;
     3.   The type of the loan: short-term loan;
     4.   The interest of the loan: at a rate that is equal to the contemporary
          interest rate for the same level of the loan published by the People's
          Bank Of China;
     5.   The Borrower guarantees to repay the principal and interest of the
          loan by June 30, 2007, and the terms of the loan agreement shall not
          be breached.
     6.   With approval from the Lender the Borrower can pay off the loan before
          June 30, 2007. The interest of the loan shall be calculated until the
          day on which the principal of the loan is repaid, and no fine shall be
          imposed on the Borrower for advancing the repayment of the loan.

The Lender:                                The Borrower:
Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development     Tianjin Tianshi Biological Engneering
Co., Ltd                                   Co., Ltd

By     /s/ Jinyuan Li                      By     /s/ Baolan Li
       ----------------------------------         ------------------------------

Title: General Manager                     Title: Director
       -------------------------------            ------------------------------

December 22, 2006                          December 22, 2006
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- NANA Services, LLC Under Contract No. SP3100-06-C-OO 16 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59447

Steven Steinberg, Esq.

Senior Corporate Counsel Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA ChiefTrial Attorney Timothy J. Ryan, Esq. Janet R. Wise, Esq.

Associate General Counsel DLA Distribution New Cumberland, PA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The appeal has been withdrawn. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's docket withprejudice. Dated: 9 September 2014

Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 59447, Appeal ofNANA Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FAIR LAWN PLAZA TAXI, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued March 22, 1960

Decided April 4, 1960.

*Mr. Heyman Zimel*argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant *(Mr. Maurice D.*Emont, attorney).

*Mr. Michael Aliotia*argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Price in the court below.

*For*affirmance—-Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Eeancis, Pboctok, Hail and Schet-TINO-7.

*For*reversal—None.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 736 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 736

            To improve the Fugitive Safe Surrender Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 6 (legislative day, April 5), 2011

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
             and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To improve the Fugitive Safe Surrender Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUGITIVE SAFE SURRENDER PROGRAM.

    Section 632 of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 
2006 (42 U.S.C. 16989) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``Fugitive Safe 
        Surrender is a program of the United States Marshals Service'' 
        and inserting ``Since its creation in 2005, the Fugitive Safe 
        Surrender program has been operated by the United States 
        Marshals Service'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``United States Marshals 
        Service'' each place it appears and inserting ``Attorney 
        General''; and
            (3) in subsection (c), by striking ``United States Marshals 
        Service'' and all that follows and inserting ``Attorney General 
        to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
        2012 through 2016.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard Root, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Trent, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonomo, J.), rendered April 26, 1983, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The evidence at trial established beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant repeatedly stabbed his unconscious victim, causing his death.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
#### European American Bank & Trust Company, Appellant, v Park Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., Respondent.

— Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 3, 1983, affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for the reasons stated in the decision of Justice Wager at Special Term. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, the undersigned, Michael V. Valenza, the Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Radnor Holdings Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that:



The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July
1, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                          
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 22, 2005 |  | /s/ Michael V. Valenza                                   
|                       |  | Michael V. Valenza                                       
|                       |  | Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|                       |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                            



A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 478 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 478

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply a 100-percent 
 continuous levy to Medicare providers and certain Federal contractors 
                       with delinquent tax debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2011

   Mr. Pryor introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply a 100-percent 
 continuous levy to Medicare providers and certain Federal contractors 
                       with delinquent tax debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Contractors Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. 100 PERCENT CONTINUOUS LEVY ON PAYMENTS TO MEDICARE PROVIDERS 
              AND SUPPLIERS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 6331(h) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the period at the end and 
inserting ``, or to a Medicare provider or supplier under title XVIII 
of the Social Security Act.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to levies issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. 100 PERCENT CONTINUOUS LEVY ON PAYMENTS RELATING TO REAL 
              PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 6331(h) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by section 2, is amended by striking 
``goods or services'' and inserting ``real property, goods, or 
services''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to levies issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
ex10-36.htm


Exhibit 10.36

 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

 

This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into effective as of January 5, 2015 by and among Kips Bay Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Randy LaBounty ("Employee").

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated May 2, 2011 (the "Employment Agreement").

 

WHEREAS, in connection with a restructuring of the Company, the Company and the Employee have agreed to amend certain provisions of the Employment Agreement as set forth herein; and

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

 

	
1.
	
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment, to the extent not otherwise defined herein, shall have the same meaning as in the Employment Agreement.



 

	
2.
	
Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to add the following sentence:



 

"Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company and the Employee agree that the Employee's salary shall be temporarily reduced from $237,544 per year to $200,000 per year, effective as of January 5, 2015 and continuing until such time as the Company decides to reinstate the Employee's salary back to $237,544 per year, or such other amount as determined by the Company. The parties understand, acknowledge and agree that in consideration for such temporary reduction in the Employee's salary, the Employee shall receive periodic stock option grants, in such amounts as determined by the Company."

 

	
3. 
	
This Amendment evidences the entire agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and all prior oral discussions and writings are merged into this Amendment.



 

	
4.
	
Except as specifically set forth herein, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect.



 

	
5.
	
This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when taken together shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each party hereto and delivered to the other party, it being understood that both parties hereto need not sign the same counterpart. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a ".pdf' format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf' signature page were an original thereof.



 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows]

 


 

 




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the patties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first written above. 

 

 

	
 
	
KIPS BAY MEDICAL, INC.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Manny Villafana
	
 

	
 
	
Name:
	
Manny Villafana
	
 

	
 
	
Title: 
	
Chairman & CEO
	
 



 

 

 

	
 
	
EMPLOYEE
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
/s/ Randy LaBounty
	
 

	
 
	
Randy LaBounty
	
 



   

 

 

 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular Solutions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, James Hennen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                                  |  |  |  | 
| | ------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 
| | /s/   James Hennen                              
| |                                                 
| | James HennenChief Financial OfficerJuly 22, 2005

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 1:16-cr-00060-TLS-SLC

)

FERNANDO GUAPO GARCIA )

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, JUDGE, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant’s request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan

Collins, on December 7, 2016, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for Defendant,

and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant’s plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the

record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of

counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is

offered;

(2) that Defendant understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty,

to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his
right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the

effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines

apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is

not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the

parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that his answers may later be used against him in a

prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty and that Defendant be

adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the two-count Indictment, and have sentence

imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and Recommendation

be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled before Judge Theresa

L. Springmann by separate order and notice. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation

are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

DATED this 7th day of December 2016.

/s/ Susan Collins 

Susan Collins,

United States Magistrate Judge

2
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Gregory Wynter

*Kent Drager,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Leon F. Dalbec, Jr.,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 25, 1989

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 654, is denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Town Sports International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Pyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(Section Mark)1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section Mark)906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ RICHARD PYLE
Town Sports International, Inc.
Chief Financial Officer
March 14, 2003
Ckta

Cherry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOHN ELVIN TURNER, Appellant, vs. H.D.S.P. - DOC; NEVADA INMATE BANK SYSTEM; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents. No. 66868 

# SLED FEB 0 3 2016

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order of the district court affirming a judgment of the justice court in a small claims matter. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge.

Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant's case arose in the justice court. The district court has final appellate jurisdiction over a case arising in the justice court. Nev. Const. art. 6, sec. 6; Tripp v. City of Sparks, 92 Nev. 362, 363, 550 P 2d 419, 419 (1976). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appsALDISMISSED. 1

Douglas

'In light of this disposition, appellant's motion to waive the filing fee is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) I947A 

# 1,0- 

# 6SL 9-4cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge John Elvin Turner Attorney General/Caron City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth Judicial District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (t)) 1947A -
VI 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 449 

For the relief of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2011 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Joseph Gabra and 

7 Sharon Kamel shall each be deemed to have been lawfully 

8 admitted to, and remained in, the United States, and shall 

9 be eligible for adjustment of status to that of an alien law10 fully admitted for permanent residence under section 245 

11 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) 

12 upon filing an application for such adjustment of status. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 449 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub2 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust3 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

4 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

5 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

6 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Joseph 

7 Gabra and Sharon Kamel, the Secretary of State shall in8 struct the proper officer to reduce by 2, during the current 

9 or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 

10 visas that are made available to natives of the country of 

11 birth of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel under section 

12 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

13 1153(a)), or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

14 visas that are made available to natives to the country of 

15 birth of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel under section 

16 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

17 (d) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

18 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You19 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

20 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

21 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

22 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate 

23 Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been 

24 submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### DE PARIS, Respondent, v. RUTLAND R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 26, 1912.)

Action by Elizabeth De Paris against the Rut-land Railroad Company. '

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, 'and motion granted, with $10 costs to defendant to abide the event of the action.

BETTS, J., dissents.