Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Notices 33737 

Yavapai County, AZ. The 17 

unassociated funerary objects are 13 

bowls, one pendent, one cup, one 

necklace, and one awl. 

Between 1933–1934, 7,171 cultural 

items were removed from Tuzigoot 

Pueblo in Yavapai County, AZ. The 

7,171 unassociated funerary objects are 

one bow, two basketry fragments, one 

spindle whorl, two axes, one crystal, 

one prayer stick, 19 dendrochronology 

samples, 13 jars, 84 bowls, four 

miniature bowls, four pitchers, four 

ladles, one miniature jar, 6,969 beads, 

12 pendants, 19 bracelets, three 

unworked shells, eight projectile points, 

six necklaces, five rings, four worked 

shells, one worked sherd, two worked 

bones, two drills, two unworked bones, 

and one pigment. 

Between 1933–1934, 896 cultural 

items were removed from Tuzigoot 

Extension Pueblo in Yavapai County, 

AZ. The 896 unassociated funerary 

objects are 19 bowls, one jar, one 

miniature jar, one ladle, one whistle, 

one bracelet, one ring, 844 beads, six 

pendants, 14 projectile points, one 

crystal, two ground stone artifacts, two 

knives, and two drills. 

Tuzigoot Pueblo is a large pueblo with 

more than 100 rooms, which is 

classified by archeologists as Southern 

Sinagua, Honanki and Tuzigoot phases. 

Occupation dates range from A.D. 1125– 

1425. Tuzigoot Extension Pueblo and 

Hatalacva Pueblo are multi-room 

pueblos near Tuzigoot National 

Monument, also classified as Southern 

Sinagua, Honanki, and Tuzigoot phases. 

The Hopi Tribe of Arizona considers 

all of Arizona to be within traditional 

Hopi lands or within areas where Hopi 

clans migrated in the past. Evidence 

demonstrating continuity between the 

people that lived at Tuzigoot, Tuzigoot 

Extension, and Hatalacva and the Hopi 

Tribe of Arizona includes archeological, 

anthropological, linguistic, folkloric, 

and oral traditions. Ceramic vessels 

made only on the Hopi mesas as well as 

coiled basketry demonstrate continuity 

between Tuzigoot Pueblo, Tuzigoot 

Extension Pueblo, and Hatalacva 

Pueblo, and the Hopi people. During 

consultation, Hopi clan members also 

identified ancestral names and 

traditional stories about specific events 

and ancestral people in the Verde 

Valley. 

Determinations Made by the U.S. 

Department of the Interior, National 

Park Service, Tuzigoot National 

Monument 

Officials of the U.S. Department of the 

Interior, National Park Service, Tuzigoot 

National Monument have determined 

that: 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), 

the 8,084 cultural items described above 

are reasonably believed to have been 

placed with or near individual human 

remains at the time of death or later as 

part of the death rite or ceremony and 

are believed, by a preponderance of the 

evidence, to have been removed from a 

specific burial site of a Native American 

individual. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there 

is a relationship of shared group 

identity that can be reasonably traced 

between the 8,084 unassociated 

funerary objects and the Hopi Tribe of 

Arizona. 

Additional Requestors and Disposition 

Lineal descendants or representatives 

of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian 

organization not identified in this notice 

that wish to claim these cultural items 

should submit a written request with 

information in support of the claim to 

Lloyd Masayumptewa, Acting 

Superintendent, Tuzigoot National 

Monument, P.O. Box 219, Camp Verde, 

AZ 86322, telephone (928) 567–5276, 

email Lloyd_Masayumptewa@nps.gov, 

by July 26, 2021. After that date, if no 

additional claimants have come 

forward, transfer of control of the 

unassociated funerary objects to the 

Hopi Tribe of Arizona may proceed. 

The U.S. Department of the Interior, 

National Park Service, Tuzigoot 

National Monument is responsible for 

notifying the Ak-Chin Indian 

Community [previously listed as the Ak 

Chin Indian Community of the 

Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, 

Arizona]; Fort McDowell Yavapai 

Nation, Arizona; Gila River Indian 

Community of the Gila River Indian 

Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe of 

Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa 

Indian Community of the Salt River 

Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O’odham 

Nation of Arizona; Yavapai-Apache 

Nation of the Camp Verde Indian 

Reservation, Arizona; Yavapai-Prescott 

Indian Tribe [previously listed as 

Yavapai-Prescott Tribe of the Yavapai 

Reservation, Arizona]; and the Zuni 

Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New 

Mexico that this notice has been 

published. 

Dated: June 9, 2021. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13509 Filed 6–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1159 

(Rescission)] 

Commission Decision To Institute a 

Rescission Proceeding; Permanent 

Rescission of a Limited Exclusion 

Order and Cease and Desist Orders; 

Termination of the Rescission 

Proceeding; Certain Lithium Ion 

Batteries, Battery Cells, Battery 

Modules, Battery Packs, Components 

Thereof, and Processes Therefor 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to institute 

a proceeding to determine whether to 

permanently rescind the Commission’s 

limited exclusion order (‘‘LEO’’) and 

cease and desist orders (‘‘CDOs’’) issued 

on February 10, 2021. The Commission 

has determined to permanently rescind 

the LEO and CDOs. The rescission 

proceeding is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2532. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on June 4, 2019, based on a complaint 

filed on behalf of LG Chem, Ltd. of 

Seoul, Republic of Korea and LG Chem 

Michigan, Inc. of Holland, Michigan. 84 

FR 25858 (June 4, 2019). As a result of 

a corporate reorganization, the 

complainants are now LG Chem, Ltd. of 

Seoul, Republic of Korea, LG Energy 

Solution, Ltd. of Seoul, Republic of 

Korea, and LG Energy Solution 

Michigan, Inc. (collectively, 

‘‘complainants’’ or ‘‘LG’’). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation and sale of 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
33738 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 120 / Friday, June 25, 2021 / Notices 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

certain lithium ion batteries, battery 

cells, battery modules, battery packs, 

components thereof, and processes 

therefor by reason of misappropriation 

of trade secrets, the threat or effect of 

which is to destroy or substantially 

injure an industry in the United States, 

under subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 

337. The complaint, as supplemented, 

names SK Innovation Co., Ltd. of Seoul, 

Republic of Korea and SK Battery 

America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia as the 

respondents (collectively, 

‘‘respondents’’ or ‘‘SK’’). The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) 

was also named as a party in this 

investigation. 

On February 14, 2020, the 

administrative law judge issued an 

initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 

34) finding that the respondents 

spoliated evidence, and that the 

appropriate remedy is to find the 

respondents in default. 

On April 17, 2020, the Commission 

determined to review the ID in its 

entirety. 85 FR 22,753 (Apr. 23, 2020) 

(‘‘Notice of Review’’). The Notice of 

Review requested that the parties brief 

certain issues and sought briefing from 

the parties, interested government 

agencies, and any other interested 

parties on remedy, the public interest, 

and bonding. 

On February 10, 2021, the 

Commission affirmed the ID’s finding of 

default, thus finding a violation of 

section 337. The Commission issued an 

LEO and two CDOs, all of which were 

tailored to accommodate public interest 

considerations raised by the parties to 

the investigation and by non-parties. 

On May 24, 2021, SK filed a petition 

to rescind the LEO and CDOs on the 

basis of settlement. LG did not oppose 

the petition, and on June 3, 2021, OUII 

filed a response in support of the 

petition. Also, on June 3, 2021, SK filed 

a supplemental submission that 

provided a modified public version of 

the settlement agreement. 

The Commission has determined that 

the petition, as supplemented, complies 

with Commission rules, see 19 CFR 

210.76(a)(3), and that there are no 

extraordinary reasons to deny rescission 

of the remedial orders. Accordingly, the 

Commission has determined to institute 

a rescission proceeding and to 

permanently rescind the LEO and the 

CDOs. The rescission proceeding is 

hereby terminated. 

The Commission’s vote on this 

determination took place on June 21, 

2021. The LEO and CDOs are 

permanently rescinded. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 22, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13574 Filed 6–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–753, 754, and 

756 (Fourth Review)] 

Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From 

China, Russia, and Ukraine 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on cut-to-length 

carbon steel plate from China and the 

termination of the suspended 

investigations on cut-to-length carbon 

steel plate from Russia and Ukraine 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on November 2, 2020 (85 FR 

69362) and determined on February 5, 

2021 that it would conduct expedited 

reviews (86 FR 26067, May 12, 2021). 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these reviews on June 21, 2021. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5205 (June 2021), 

entitled Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel 

Plate from China, Russia, and Ukraine: 

Investigation Nos. 731–TA–753, 754, 

and 756 (Fourth Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 21, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–13523 Filed 6–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

[Docket No. 19–18] 

Robert Wayne Locklear, M.D.; Decision 

and Order 

I. Procedural History 

On March 26, 2019, the Assistant 

Administrator, Diversion Control 

Division, Drug Enforcement 

Administration (hereinafter, DEA or 

Government), issued an Order to Show 

Cause (hereinafter, OSC) to Robert 

Wayne Locklear, M.D., (hereinafter, 

Respondent) of Johnson City, 

Tennessee. Administrative Law Judge 

(hereinafter, ALJ) Exhibit (hereinafter, 

ALJX) 1 (OSC), at 1. The OSC proposed 

the denial of Respondent’s application 

for a DEA Certificate of Registration, 

Application Control No. W18124612C, 

‘‘pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(2) & (a)(5), 

because [Respondent has] been 

convicted of a felony related to 

controlled substances and because [he 

has] been excluded from participation 

in a program pursuant to section 1320a– 

7(a) of Title 42.’’ Id. 

Specifically, the OSC alleged that, on 

October 8, 2014, Judgment was entered 

against Respondent in the United States 

District Court for the Eastern District of 

Tennessee (hereinafter, E.D. Tenn.) 

‘‘after [Respondent] pled guilty to: one 

count of ‘Conspiracy to Distribute a 

Quantity of Cocaine Base,’ in violation 

of 21 U.S.C. 846 & 841(b)(1)(C); and one 

count of ‘Conspiracy to Defraud a 

Health Care Benefit Program,’ in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. 1347 & 1349.’’ Id. 

at 2 (citing U.S. v. Robert Wayne 

Locklear, No. 2:14–CR–38 (E.D. Tenn. 

Oct. 8, 2014)). The OSC alleged that 

Respondent’s conviction of a felony 

related to controlled substances 

warrants the denial of Respondent’s 

application pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 

824(a)(2). 

The OSC further alleged that ‘‘based 

on [such] conviction, the U.S. 

Department of Health and Human 

Services, Office of Inspector General 

(‘HHS/OIG’) mandatorily excluded 

[Respondent] from participation in 

Medicare, Medicaid, and all Federal 

health care programs pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. 1320a–7(a).’’ Id. The OSC stated 

that this exclusion took effect on June 

18, 2015, and ‘‘runs for a period of ten 

years,’’ and that such exclusion 

‘‘warrants denial of [Respondent’s] 

application for DEA registration 

pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(5).’’ Id. 

The Order to Show Cause notified 

Respondent of the right to request a 

hearing on the allegations or to submit 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1