alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of AFV Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos Zalduondo, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/Carlos Zalduondo |
|--------|---------------------|

|   | Carlos Zalduondo |
|--------|------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|--------|---------------------------------------|

|   | October 15, 2007 |
|--------|------------------|
#### The People ex rel. George E. Carrigan, Respondent, *v.*The Board of Police for the City of Yonkers, Appellant.

(Argued June 17, 1890;

decided June 24, 1890.)

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme ■Court in the second judicial department, made the second Monday of February, 1890, which reversed the determination of the appellant in removing the relator from his position as a patrolman on the police force of the city of Yonkers.

The following is the *mem.*of opinion :

“ The respondent was charged with the commission of two Violations of the police rules. One was his absence from roll-call without leave, and the other was for being unable to perform his duties as patrolman on account of a vile disease. To both of these he pleaded guilty, and there was evidence which tended to establish the facts as to each charge. Whether the reason for his absence, or the nature of the malady which incapacitated him physically, were such as to excuse him from severe punishment was a matter for the determination of the *717police commissioners. They found him guilty after a trial upon the charges, and dismissed him from the police force. The evidence establishing the offence being undisputed, no case was made for an interference by the appellate court with the conclusions of the commissioners.

“ It was error, therefore, to reverse their determination, and the order of the General Term should be reversed and the judgment of the police commissioners affirmed.”

*Joseph F, Daly*for appellant.

*John F. Brenna/n*for respondent.

*Per Curiam*

opinion for reversal.

All concur.

Order reversed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20444 Conference Calendar

JOSEPH YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF HOUSTON TEXAS; METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY; PLEASANTVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE; DENVER HARBOR CIVIC LEAGUE; PORT OF HOUSTON CIVIC LEAGUE; FIFTH WARD CIVIC LEAGUE CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF HOUSTON/GALVESTON; SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION; HOUSTON RECOVERY CAMPUS; CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CORP; CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA; PROSPECT HOUSE/FULFILLMENT FOUNDATION; HOUSTON AFTERCARE; CHANNEL 13NEWS/ABC BROADCASTING CO; GEHOVA WITNESS ASSOCIATION; OPEN DOOR MISSION/BOARD OF DIRECTORS; TIMMY DANG CHICKEN AND RICE; SUPER MERCARDO FOOD MARKET; JERRY CRAWFORD, doing business as Jerry Crawford Real Estate; UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; JACK IN THE BOX INC., Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-2348

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joseph Young has appealed the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Young has limited his arguments on appeal to his claims against the City of Houston. We haveNo. 01-20444 -2- reviewed the record and Young's arguments on appeal and are unable to conclude that Young's allegations, if developed further, might present a nonfrivolous constitutional claim against the City of Houston. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994); see also Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Okla. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997); Johnson v.
Moore , 958 F.2d 92, 94 (5th Cir. 1992). Young's conclusional arguments do not demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint as delusional and factually frivolous. See Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Young's request for injunctive relief and all other outstanding motions are DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.
#### JONES, Appellant, v. JONES, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 2, 1907.)

Action by Carrie Jones, against Jesse Jones, as executrix, etc.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon questions of law and fact. Held, that the decision and judgment were contrary to the evidence.

Mclennan, p. j„ dissents.
Exhibit 10.15

REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP  SUMMARY OF  ANNUAL EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Our board of directors and stockholders have approved the following material terms for payment of bonuses under our annual executive incentive programs.

Payment
of an annual incentive to a covered executive officer is contingent upon the attainment of one or more performance goals (which may be stated as alternative goals) established in
writing by the compensation committee of the board of directors (while the attainment of such goals is substantially uncertain) for a covered executive officer for each performance period, which is
generally our taxable year. Performance goals may be based on one or more business criteria that apply to an individual, a business unit or our company as a whole, but need not be based on an increase
or positive result under the business criteria selected. The compensation committee is prohibited from increasing the amount of compensation payable if a performance goal is met, but may reduce or
eliminate compensation even if such performance goal is attained.

Performance
goals are based on one or more of the following business criteria: (1) total stockholder return; (2) such total stockholder return as compared to total return
(on a comparable basis) of a publicly available index such as, but not limited to, the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index; (3) net income; (4) pretax earnings; (5) earnings
before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (6) earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent; (7) pretax operating earnings after
interest expense and before bonuses and extraordinary or special items; (8) operating margin; (9) earnings per share; (10) return on equity; (11) return on capital;
(12) return on investment; (13) operating earnings; (14) working capital; (15) ratio of debt to stockholders' equity; and (16) revenue. The maximum annual incentive
award that may be granted to any covered executive officer based on attainment of one or more of the foregoing performance goals is $1 million.

The
annual incentive compensation payable in any fiscal year based on such performance goals cannot be determined because the payment of such compensation is contingent upon attainment
of the pre-established performance goals, the maximum amount of such compensation depends on our company's performance for the applicable performance period, and the actual annual
incentive compensation to a covered executive officer may reflect exercise of the compensation committee's
discretion to reduce the annual incentive compensation otherwise payable upon attainment of the performance goal.



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,325
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              19
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     25,212
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          17,923
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,908
<LOANS>                                         56,669
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,817
<DEPOSITS>                                      96,419
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,057
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,207
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,350
<COMMON>                                        24,612
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,828)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 114,817
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,435
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,264
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   540
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,239
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,045
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,069
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,170
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (12)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (118)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (118)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (118)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.16
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,399
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 5,480
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,969
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      695
<RECOVERIES>                                       315
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,589
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,349
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            240
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

NCI, LLC F/K/A AUTO GLASS STORE, LLC

A/A/O ANTHONY DEFUSCO,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-1773

LT Case No. 2019-SC-003428-O

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY AND PROGRESSIVE SELECT 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Appellees. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed November 15, 2022

Nonfinal Appeal from the County Court 

for Orange County, 

Carly S. Wish, Judge. 

Earl I. Higgs, Jr., of Higgs Law, P.A., 

Orlando, for Appellant. 

Lissette M. Gonzalez, of Cole, Scott 

& Kissane, P.A., Miami, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. NCI, LLC v. Progressive Select Ins., No. 5D21-1282, 

2022 WL 16702296 (Fla. 5th DCA Nov. 4, 2022). 

SASSO, TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
[No. 21487-3-II.

Division Two.

September 19, 1997.]

#### Glenn W. Procop, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Licensing, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 96-2-00028-1, James E.F.X. Warme, J., entered December 9, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Morgan, J.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7985

KARL X. BELFIELD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

H. CHAPMAN, Correctional Officer; E. SMITH,

Correctional Officer; MR. MAYES, Correctional

Officer; D. R. LAWSON, Warden at Southampton

Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-751-2)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karl X. Belfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a

filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th

Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the

case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee

order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district

court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2497

CHARLES A. ALLEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PARRIS N. GLENDENING; KURT L. SCHMOKE; ALVIN

C. COLLINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-1960-S)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles A. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Steven David Keller, Assistant

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; William Rowe Phelan, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Allen v. Glendening, No. CA-95-1960-S (D. Md. July 20,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

      ( print page 37197)    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         July 14, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 8, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 711 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-108, CP2021-110.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-15000 Filed 7-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Dated:  October 17, 2011 |   |   |   | By: |   | /s/ Eddie Vakser |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   | Eddie VakserChief Financial Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         (1,311)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 (811)
<PP&E>                                      45,151,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,786,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,735,852
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    53,743,325
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,786,399
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,212
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,914)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Presidential Documents 36481 

Notice of July 7, 2021 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Transnational Criminal Organizations 

On July 24, 2011, by Executive Order 13581, the President declared a national 

emergency with respect to transnational criminal organizations pursuant 

to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et 

seq.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 

security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by 

the activities of significant transnational criminal organizations. 

On March 15, 2019, by Executive Order 13863, the President took additional 

steps to deal with the national emergency with respect to significant 

transnational criminal organizations in view of the evolution of these organizations as well as the increasing sophistication of their activities, which 

threaten international political and economic systems and pose a direct 

threat to the safety and welfare of the United States and its citizens, and 

given the ability of these organizations to derive revenue through widespread 

illegal conduct, including acts of violence and abuse that exhibit a wanton 

disregard for human life as well as many other crimes enriching and empowering these organizations. 

The activities of significant transnational criminal organizations continue 

to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 

policy, and economy of the United States. For these reasons, the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 13581 of July 24, 2011, under which 

additional steps were taken in Executive Order 13863 of March 15, 2019, 

must continue in effect beyond July 24, 2021. Therefore, in accordance 

with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to significant 

transnational criminal organizations declared in Executive Order 13581. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_MEMO1
36482 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

July 7, 2021. [FR Doc. 2021–14814 

Filed 7–8–21; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F1–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_MEMO1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>