alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-92328; File No. SR-CboeEDGA-2021-013]

                    On May 28, 2021, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          a proposed rule change to introduce a new data product to be known as Short Sale Volume data.                

                    The proposed rule change was published for comment in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 16, 2021.[3]                                          On June 30, 2021, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-CboeEDGA-2021-013).                

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[4] 

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,

Assistant Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92151 (June 10, 2021), 86 FR 32099. Comment on the proposed rule change is located at:                         *https://www.sec.gov/​comments/​sr-cboeedga-2021-013/​srcboeedga2021013.htm.*
        Back to Citation      

4.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-14693 Filed 7-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Dated:  May 2, 2011 |   |   |   | By: |   | /s/ Eddie Vakser |
|                          |   |   |   |   |   | Eddie VakserChief Financial Officer |

----
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-24-00155-CV 

 

BENNY AND KERRICK HORTON D/B/A K & B PROPERTIES, APPELLANTS 

V. 

ASHLEY SMITH, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 223rd District Court 

Gray County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 41049, Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool, Presiding 

August 13, 2024 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellants, Benny and Kerrick Horton d/b/a K & B Properties, appeal from the trial 

court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Rule 91(a) Motion to Dismiss. Now pending before 

this Court is Appellants and Appellee’s “Agreed Motion to Remand to Trial Court.” The 

motion is granted. Pursuant to the motion, we set aside the Order Granting Defendant’s 

Rule 91(a) Motion to Dismiss without regard to the merits, remand the case to the trial 

court for further proceedings, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). As 
2

requested by the parties, costs shall be taxed against the parties who incurred them. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

Per Curiam
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua M. BRYANT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-10689

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 30, 2011.

Terry Flynn, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, Robert G. Davies, Thomas F. Kirwin, Stephen P. Preisser, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Chet Kaufman, Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, Randall Lockhart, Federal Public Defender Office, Pensacola, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Joshua M. Bryant in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bryant’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1252

LANTZ H. LITTLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Charleston Naval

Shipyard/Agency,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-95-2144-2-18)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 16, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lantz H. Little, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Beane Seymour, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

complaint against the Department of the Navy. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Little v.

Department of the Navy, No. CA-95-2144-2-18 (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (91)
<INVENTORY>                                     25,662
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,510
<PP&E>                                          30,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,915
<BONDS>                                        170,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,333)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,494
<SALES>                                         66,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,518
<CGS>                                           42,776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,394
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,939
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,455
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 3.5

      State of Delaware
     Secretary of State
  Division or Corporations
Delivered 04:23 PM 08/28/2008
  FILED 04:23 PM 08/28/2008
SRV 080911903 - 4593360 FILE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               BAKER'S PRIDE INC.

1.   The name of the corporation shall be Baker's Pride Inc.

2.   Its registered office in the State of Delaware is located at One Commerce
     Center, 1201 Orange Street, #600, Wilmington, Delaware 19899. The name of
     its registered agent at such address is InCorp Services, Inc.

3.   The purpose of the corporation shall be to engage in any lawful act or
     activity for which corporations may be organized under the General
     Corporation Law of Delaware.

4.   The total number of shares which the corporation shall be authorized to
     issue is ten thousand (10,000) shares of common stock with a par value of
     $0.001 per share.

5.   The powers, preferences and rights and the qualifications, limitations or
     restrictions thereof shall be determined by the board of directors.

6.   The name and address of the incorporator is as follows:

                           Christopher R. Sackett
                           Suite 2000 Ruan Center
                           666 Grand Avenue
                           Des Moines, IA 50309

7.   The board of directors of the corporation shall have the power to adopt,
     amend or repeal the bylaws of the corporation.

8.   No director shall be personally liable to the corporation or its
     stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty by such
     director as a director. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a director
     shall be liable to the extent provided by applicable law, (i) for breach of
     the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii)
     for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
     misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) pursuant to Section 174 or
     the Delaware General Corporation Law or (iv) for any transaction from which
     the director derived an improper personal benefit. No amendment to or
     repeal of this Section 8 shall apply to or have any effect on the liability
     or alleged liability of any director of the corporation for or with respect
     to any acts or omissions of such director occurring prior to such
     amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the incorporator herein before named,
has executed, signed and acknowledged this certificate of incorporation this
28th day of August, 2008.


                               By: /s/ Christopher R. Sackett
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Christopher R. Sackett, Incorporator
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DIDKYEULER CASTILLO and SHERLY AGUILAR,

Appellants,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3284

[January 18, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Hon. Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE21003464. 

Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for 

appellants.

David C. Borucke of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 10.57**

 

 

 

 

**Promissory Note**

 

 

| $237,903.00 | 10% Interest Per Annum |
|-------------|------------------------|

 

 

Pursuant to this Promissory Note (“Note”), dated this 8th day of August 2007, Hydrogen Power, Inc., (“HPI”) a corporation, for value received, agrees to pay to Global Hydrofuel Technologies, Inc. (“GHTI”) the sum of two hundred thirty seven thousand and nine hundred three dollars, ($237,903.00) the “principal amount”, together with interest starting August 1, 2007 on the unpaid principal balance at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum.  Payment of interest only is due each month in the amount of $1,982.53.  The first interest payment is due September 1, 2007. Subsequent interest payments are due on the 1st day of each succeeding month.  The principal amount shall be due on December 15, 2007. This Promissory Note is in consideration for the remaining amount due by HPI in 2007 for license fees due under the Sublicense Agreement and Consentbetween GHTI and HPI.

 

This Note may be prepaid at any time or from time to time in whole or in part without penalty, premium or permission.
Unassociated Document


    
      

    

    

      AMENDED EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT

      


      Agreement
entered into as of this 26th day of October 2009, between Andrew Makrides
(“Employee”) and Bovie Medical Corporation, (“Employer”)

      


      WHEREAS, the parties have
heretofore entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated February
1, 2000, as the same has been amended pursuant to the Board Resolutions dated
January 23, 2002, January 6, 2004, November 15, 2006, and October 26, 2009;
and

      


      WHEREAS, the parties are
desirous of memorializing the effect of the aforementioned resolutions and
further amending said Agreement on the terms hereinafter set forth.

      


      NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and covenants herein contained,

      


      IT
IS HEREBY AGREED:

      


      
        	
                1.

              	
                Paragraph
      3 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
      follows:

              


      

      


      TERM:
The initial term of employment under this Agreement shall be effective as of the
1st day
of February, 2000, and shall continue until January 31, 2014 or until terminated
as hereinafter provided. After January 31, 2014, the term of this Agreement
shall be automatically extended for continuous terms of one year each unless the
Employer provides the Employee with written notice of termination at least nine
months prior to the date the Employer plans to terminate.

      


      
        	
                2.

              	
                Except
      as amended hereby, the Agreement is hereby ratified and
      approved.

              


      

      


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties
have set forth their signatures this ­­­­­­30th day of
November, 2009.

      


      
        	 
      	
                BOVIE
      MEDICAL CORPORATION

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Moshe Citronowicz

              
	 
      	 
      	
                Moshe
      Citronowicz

              
	 
      	 
      	
                Chief
      Operating Officer

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                /s/ Andrew Makrides

              
	 
      	 
      	
                 Andrew
      Makrides
#### MUTUAL COAL CO., Respondent, v. H. G. REALTY CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 29, 1912.)

Action by the Mutual Coal Company against the H. G. Realty Company. T. C. McDonald, for appellant. H. Cohen, for respondent. No opinion. Determination (130 N. Y. Supp. 169) affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute ordered on stipulation, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 146 App. Div. 955, 131 N. Y. Supp. 1130.
#### Peter R. TIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEMANDED AS SET FORTH, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-16979.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2011.*

Filed June 30, 2011.

*458Peter R. Tia, Aiea, HI, pro se.

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Peter R. Tia, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging violations of his constitutional rights and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal of a complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A) for failure to state a claim. *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Tia’s claim that he was subject to inhumane conditions of confinement because Tia failed to allege that any prison officials were deliberately indifferent to conditions that posed a substantial risk of serious harm to him. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 834-35, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (setting forth deliberate indifference standard).

The district court properly denied Tia’s request for a criminal investigation into the alleged RICO conspiracy because Tia lacks standing to compel an investigation or prosecution of another person. *See Linda R.S. v. Richard D.,*410 U.S. 614, 619, 93 S.Ct. 1146, 35 L.Ed.2d 536 (1973) (“[A] private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or non-prosecution of another.”).

Tia’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 15 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk September 15 , 2017

15 6 465 ( 77 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 15 6 465

v COA: 3 2 9 847

Wayne CC : 15

- 001347

- FC

DAVID RAMON COLEMAN

, Defendant

- Appell ant

.

____________________________________ _ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to file a pro per

supplement to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The pro per supplement

submitted on September 13 , 2017 , is accepted for filing

.
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WAMU MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-AR3, as follows:

     1. I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting President of the Company.

     2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

     3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate
on behalf of the Company.

     4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

     5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 15, 2004.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Michael L. Parker
                         Michael L. Parker,
                         President and Director
**Exhibit32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Joel Boyarski,the Principal Financial Officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc., herebycertify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theForm 10-Q of WorldGate Communications, Inc., for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2007, which this certification accompanies, fully complies withrequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the June 30, 2007 Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of WorldGate Communications, Inc.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toWorldGate and will be retained by WorldGate and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated: August 9, 2007 |   | /s/ JOEL  BOYARSKI                            |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                  |   |  Joel  Boyarski                          |
|                  |   | Chief Financial  Officer                      |
|                  |   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
Order entered March 15, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00163

- CV

JOHN THOMAS, M.D., ET AL. , Appellant s

V.

BIOTE MEDICAL, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 09503



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ March 14, 2019 unopposed motion for extension of time

to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to April 18, 2019

.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE