alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00258-CR

Michael John Covarrubias

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1226932D)

September 25, 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
exhibit_4a-97.htm










Exhibit 4.4.(a).97













The State of Israel


Ministry of Communications


 


General License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of


Mobile Radio Telephone (MRT) Services using the Cellular Method




 


Amendment No. 81







By virtue of the authority of the Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have been delegated to us, by all our other powers under any law and after having considered the arguments of Partner Communications Company Ltd. (hereinafter: “Partner”), we hereby amend the General License for the provision of mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular method granted to Partner on 7 April 1998,  as follows:








	
Amendment


of Appendix N

	
1.

	
In Appendix N:


 

	  
	  	
a.

	
In article 6.3, after "The Hosting Licensee shall give" shall come "at least once a day,"; and after "for the Premium Service" shall come (hereinafter "Premium records file")".


 


	  	
b.

	
In article 7.2, after "the available balance of the Subscriber" shall come "or at the latest upon receipt of the Premium records file".







 


(December 30, 2014)







     (sgd)                                           


________________                                                                                                                                


Avi Berger


Director General
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
                    Here's how you know **Official websites use .gov**
                            
                            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                            
                            A **lock** (                            
                              A locked padlock                                                      
                            
                            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Menu Agricultural Research Service
						
                    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 Northeast Area
 close



    Research

                    Research Projects
                                    Publications
                                    Collaborations
                                    News
                People

                    Staff Listing
                                    Careers


        
                Northeast Area Cities

                    Washington, D.C.
                            Newark, Delaware
                            Boston, Massachusetts
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BHNRC)
                            Beltsville, Maryland (BARC)
                            Frederick, Maryland
                            Orono, Maine
                            Geneva, New York
                            Ithaca, New York
                            University Park, Pennsylvania
                            Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania
                            Kearneysville, West Virginia
                            Leetown, West Virginia
                            Burlington, Vermont


                    Civil Rights & EEO Policy StatementsSearch small
                    Search
            
            ARS Home
                                About ARS
                                Contact Us






BARC Public Field Dayheadline bar News
               Field Day 2005
               Field Day Gallery
               Field Day 2004
               Field Day 2003
               Field Day 2002
               Field Day 1999-2001
               Field Day 2007
               Field Day 2010


Return to top


Connect with ARS Sign up


ARS Home
                            USDA.gov
                            Plain Writing
                            Policies & Links
                            Civil Rights Statements
                            FOIA
                            Accessibility Statement
                            Privacy Policy
                            Non-Discrimination Statement
                            Quality of Information
                            USA.gov
                            WhiteHouse.gov
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 718 

To amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to improve 

the use of certain registered pesticides. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2011 

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

Rodenticide Act to improve the use of certain registered 

pesticides. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF REGISTERED PESTICIDES. 

4 Section 3(f) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 

5 and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136a(f)) is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(5) USE OF REGISTERED PESTICIDES.—Not8 withstanding any other law, no permit shall be re9 quired for— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 718 IS

1 ‘‘(A) the use of a pesticide that is reg2 istered or otherwise authorized for use under 

3 this Act, if that use is in accordance with this 

4 Act; or 

5 ‘‘(B)(i) the use of a biological control orga6 nism (as defined in section 403 of the Plant 

7 Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7702)) for the preven8 tion, control, or eradication of a plant pest or 

9 noxious weed, if that use is in accordance with 

10 that Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.); or 

11 ‘‘(ii) the conduct of any other plant pest, 

12 noxious weed, or pest control activity under 

13 that Act, if that activity is conducted in accord14 ance with that Act.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019187EN.01003801.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/38

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 26 February 2019 — Hecta Viticol SRL v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) — Direcția Generală de Soluționare a Contestațiilor, Biroul Vamal de Interior Buzău and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Galați

(Case C-184/19)

(2019/C 187/42)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel București

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Hecta Viticol SRL

Respondents: Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) — Direcția Generală de Soluționare a Contestațiilor, Biroul Vamal de Interior Buzău and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Galați

Questions referred

| 1. | Do Articles 7, 11 [and] 15 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonization of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages (1) and Article 5 of Council Directive 92/84/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the approximation of the rates of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages (2) preclude the provisions of Article I(21) and Article IV(1) of Ordonanța de urgență [a Guvernului] nr. 54 din 23 iunie 2010 privind unele măsuri pentru combaterea evaziunii fiscale (Government Emergency Order No 54 of 23 June 2010 laying down certain measures to address tax evasion)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do Articles 7, 11 [and] 15 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonization of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages (1) and Article 5 of Council Directive 92/84/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the approximation of the rates of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages (2) preclude the provisions of Article I(21) and Article IV(1) of Ordonanța de urgență [a Guvernului] nr. 54 din 23 iunie 2010 privind unele măsuri pentru combaterea evaziunii fiscale (Government Emergency Order No 54 of 23 June 2010 laying down certain measures to address tax evasion)?

| 2. | Do the principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate [expectations] preclude the rule laid down in Article I(21) and Article IV(1) of Ordonanța de urgență [a Guvernului] nr. 54 din 23 iunie 2010 privind unele măsuri pentru combaterea evaziunii fiscale, inasmuch as it alters the rate of excise duty on still fermented beverages other than beer and wines? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do the principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate [expectations] preclude the rule laid down in Article I(21) and Article IV(1) of Ordonanța de urgență [a Guvernului] nr. 54 din 23 iunie 2010 privind unele măsuri pentru combaterea evaziunii fiscale, inasmuch as it alters the rate of excise duty on still fermented beverages other than beer and wines?

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 316, p. 21.

(2)  OJ 1992 L 316, p. 29.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 572 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 148
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 572

                          [Report No. 112-68]

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the prohibition on 
 collective bargaining with respect to matters and questions regarding 
 compensation of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs other 
            than rates of basic pay, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2011

  Mr. Brown of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Rockefeller, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 
   Franken, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Merkley, and Mr. Begich) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

                           September 6, 2011

               Reported by Mrs. Murray, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the prohibition on 
 collective bargaining with respect to matters and questions regarding 
 compensation of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs other 
            than rates of basic pay, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON COLLECTIVE BARGAINING WITH RESPECT 
              TO COMPENSATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              EMPLOYEES OTHER THAN RATES OF BASIC PAY.

    Subsections (b) and (d) of section 7422 of title 38, United States 
Code, are amended by striking ``compensation'' both places it appears 
and inserting ``rates of basic pay''.
                                                       Calendar No. 148

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 572

                          [Report No. 112-68]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the prohibition on 
 collective bargaining with respect to matters and questions regarding 
 compensation of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs other 
            than rates of basic pay, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 6, 2011

                       Reported without amendment
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6548

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEVIN MICHAEL STEHLIK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:13-cr-00694-RBH-1; 4:15-cv-03480-

RBH)

Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Michael Stehlik, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Michael Stehlik seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stehlik has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32 (ii)**

CERTIFICATION SECTION 1350

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianL. Knepp, Vice President of Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)           the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.
|                                                            |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ Brian L. Knepp                                         |   |
| Brian L. Knepp                                             |
| Vice President of Finance and Principal Financial  Officer |
|                                                       |
| May 10, 2007                                               |

 

 

----
# C_2019206EN.01002101.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti — Sezione Giurisdizionale Per la Regione Puglia (Italy) lodged on 25 February 2019 — IC v Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale

(Case C-169/19)

(2019/C 206/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte dei Conti — Sezione Giurisdizionale Per la Regione Puglia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: IC

Defendant: Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale

Question referred

Must Articles 18 TFEU and 21 TFEU be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides for the taxation, in that Member State, of the income of a person resident in another Member State who receives all of his income from the first Member State but who does not hold the nationality of the second Member State, without the benefit of the tax advantages provided by that second Member State?

---
MLP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0660

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA DUANE WOLFBLACK,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including February 16, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 16 2024

01/16/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0660
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U. S.
      C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Daniel Zwiren,
      as
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Daniel ZwirenDaniel
              ZwirenChief
                Financial Officer (Principal
              Financial
                Officer)Dated: April 17, 2007
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 725 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage, 

as supplies associated with the injection of insulin, of containment, removal, decontamination and disposal of home-generated needles, syringes, 

and other sharps through a sharps container, decontamination/destruction device, or sharps-by-mail program or similar program under part 

D of the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2011 

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for coverage, as supplies associated with the injection 

of insulin, of containment, removal, decontamination and 

disposal of home-generated needles, syringes, and other 

sharps through a sharps container, decontamination/destruction device, or sharps-by-mail program or similar 

program under part D of the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 725 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Safe Needle 

3 Disposal Coverage Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF CONTAINMENT, REMOVAL, DECON5 TAMINATION AND DISPOSAL OF HOME-GEN6 ERATED NEEDLES, SYRINGES, AND OTHER 

7 SHARPS THROUGH A SHARPS CONTAINER, 

8 DECONTAMINATION/DESTRUCTION DEVICE, 

9 OR SHARPS-BY-MAIL PROGRAM OR SIMILAR 

10 PROGRAM UNDER MEDICARE PART D. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–2(e)(1)(B) of the 

12 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–102(e)(1)(B)) is 

13 amended by inserting after ‘‘regulations of the Secretary’’ 

14 the following: ‘‘and including devices approved for home 

15 use by the Food and Drug Administration for the safe 

16 and effective containment, removal, decontamination and 

17 disposal of home-generated needles, syringes, and other 

18 sharps through a sharps container, decontamination/de19 struction device, or sharps-by-mail program or similar pro20 gram’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

22 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2012. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          47,639
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              32
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    281,033
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          97,139
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            97,863
<LOANS>                                      1,223,462
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,683,745
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,352,524
<SHORT-TERM>                                    54,248
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,290
<LONG-TERM>                                    112,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,504
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,683,745
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 71,398
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               20,005
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   131
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                91,534
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              35,037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,666
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           50,868
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,495
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 366
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 37,609
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,759
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,759
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,991
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.55
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,357
<LOANS-PAST>                                       719
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   265
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,766
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,903
<RECOVERIES>                                       289
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,647
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,647
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>