alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

Noble Corporation plc, a company registered under the laws of England and Wales

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Noble Corporation plc (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2013, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. MacLennan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                                                   
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|April 30, 2014 |  | /s/ James A. MacLennan                                                            
|               |  | James A. MacLennan                                                                
|               |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                 
|               |  | of Noble Corporation plc, a company registered under the
laws of England and Wales
Exhibit 12.1  I, Sergei A. Plastinin, certify
that:  1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of
Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods OJSC;  2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.             The companys other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
have:  (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.             The companys other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial
reporting.   Date:  June 28, 2004
  /s/ Sergei
  A. PlastininSergei A.
  PlastininChief
  Executive Officer
Exhibit 23



J.A. MINNI & ASSOCIATES INC.

SUITE 1104-750 WESTPENDER STREET

CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANT

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA

CANADA V6C 2T8

Jerry A. Minni, C.G.A. *

Geoffrey S. V. Pang, C.G.A., FCCA **

TELEPHONE:  (604)683-0343

FAX:  (604)683-4499

*   Incorporated Professional

** Associate















RE: CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR







I consent to the use in the Form 10-KSB of Bi-Optic Ventures Inc. of my auditors report, dated May 22, 2003, in connection with my audits of the financial statements of that Company, for the years ended February 28, 2003 and 2002, which report is included in the Form 10-KSB.









J.A. Minni & Associates Inc.

Certified General Accountant





Vancouver, B.C.

May 27, 2003
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: September 11, 2014 518777

________________________________ In the Matter of SANTUNU RAFI, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER D. VENETTOZZI, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: August 4, 2014 Before: Garry, J.P., Rose, Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________ Santunu Rafi, Stormville, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Mercure, J.), entered August 27, 2013 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. While waiting to enter the prison mess hall, petitioner told a female cook that he loved her and that he was going to use his "connections" to ensure that an inmate who had "disrespected [her] pays for it." The cook found this conversation to be threatening and, as such, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with stalking, harassment and making threats. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of-2- 518777

stalking and harassment. The harassment charge was upheld upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. Petitioner now appeals from the dismissal of the petition by Supreme Court. We affirm. Petitioner sought the testimony of a correction captain solely to corroborate his claim of retaliation but, inasmuch as the captain had no knowledge of the actual incident and petitioner had already provided detailed testimony as to his retaliation claim, the request was properly denied as redundant (see Matter of Cahill v Prack, 106 AD3d 1310, 1311 [2013]; Matter of Rosales v Pratt, 98 AD3d 764, 765 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 816 [2012]). The further contention that petitioner was denied the right to call certain inmate witnesses who executed witness refusal forms is unpreserved given his "fail[ure] to object or request that the Hearing Officer make further inquiry" (Matter of Taylor v Fischer, 89 AD3d 1298, 1299 [2011]; see Matter of Toro v Fischer, 104 AD3d 1036, 1037 [2013]). Petitioner was similarly made aware that the cook no longer worked at the facility when he sought to recall her for additional testimony, and did not request that any effort be made to secure her testimony (see Matter of Garcia v Coughlin, 194 AD2d 896, 897 [1993]). There is no support in the record for petitioner's remaining argument that the Hearing Officer was biased against him (see Matter of Fero v Prack, 110 AD3d 1128, 1129 [2013]). Garry, J.P., Rose, Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 7, 2016

jam 

# Order

Clerk June 7, 2016

1 53771 ( 40 )

TIM TREVINO

,

Plaintiff

- Ap pellant,

v SC: 1 53771

COA: 328362

ROBERT JAMESON

,

Defendant

- Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be

liable for filing fees.

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pa y to the

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $ 6 7.00, shall submit a copy of this order

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of

$3 0 8.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6805

THOMAS D. CROOKS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; WILLIAM DAVIS, Warden; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General

of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-888-2-17AJ)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas D. Crooks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Crooks v.

Moore, No. CA-97-888-2-17AJ (D.S.C. May 6 & 19, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2365 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the time limitation for 

use of eligibility and entitlement for educational assistance under the 

Montgomery GI Bill. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2005 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the time 

limitation for use of eligibility and entitlement for educational assistance under the Montgomery GI Bill. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Montgomery GI Bill 

5 Flexibility Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 2365 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME LIMITATION FOR USE OF 

2 MONTGOMERY GI BILL ENTITLEMENT. 

3 (a) EXTENSION OF LIMITATION PERIOD.—Section 

4 3031 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘10-year’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘14- 

6 year’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICABILITY.—The 

8 amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to 

10 individuals whose entitlement to educational assistance 

11 under chapter 30 of title 38, United States Code, has not 

12 expired as of such date under the provisions of section 

13 3031 of such title as in effect on the date preceding such 

14 date of enactment. 

Æ
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      This  certification  is intended  to  accompany  the Annual  Report of AGU
Entertainment  Corp.  (the  "Company") on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the
period  ended  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  and is given  solely  for the
purpose of satisfying  the  requirements  of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002. The undersigned,  in
my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except for the filing date; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


                 /s/  David C. Levy, President Principal Executive Officer and
                 -------------------------------------------------------------
                 Principal Financial Officer               Date: June 15, 2004



                                       40
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 31, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vascular
Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, James Hennen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
 operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ James Hennen       
| |                        
| | James Hennen           
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | July 25, 2008          

---
#### JOHN EPPS, PETITIONER-PETITIONER, v. RICHARD GOLD, *ET AL.,*RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Argued May 10, 1960

Decided May 23, 1960.

*Mr. James J. Sheeran*argued the cause for the appellant.

*Mr. Nathan Cholodenlco*argued the cause for the respondent.

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Ereund.

*For*affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schet*tino—7.*

*For*reversal—Hone.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carl F. Fahrenkrug, Chief Executive Officer of Microwave Filter Company,
Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
    December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
    78m or 78o(d); and

(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.

Dated: February 14, 2008                    /s/ Carl F. Fahrenkrug
                                                Carl F. Fahrenkrug
                                                Chief Executive Officer

<page>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard L. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Microwave Filter Company, Inc.
(the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
    December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
    78m or 78o(d); and

(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.

Dated: February 14, 2008                   /s/ Richard L. Jones
                                                Richard L. Jones
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Railroad Retirement Board 20 CFR Ch. II
 AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board.
 ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
 SUMMARY: This agenda contains a list of regulations that the Board is developing or proposes to develop in the next 12 months and regulations that are scheduled to be reviewed in that period.
 ADDRESSES: 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, IL 60611-1275.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marguerite P. Dadabo, Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Railroad Retirement Board, (312) 751-4945, Fax (312) 751-7102, TDD (312) 751-4701.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations that are routine in nature or which pertain solely to internal Agency management have not been included in the agenda. Dated: March 17, 2021. By Authority of the Board. Stephanie Hillyard, Secretary to the Board.
 Railroad Retirement Board—Final Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation Identifier No.226
Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities Conducted by the Railroad Retirement Board **(Section 610 Review)**
3220-AB73
 RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD (RRB) Final Rule Stage 226. Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities Conducted by the Railroad Retirement Board (Section 610 Review) *Legal Authority:*29 U.S.C. 794 *Abstract:* We propose to amend our regulations at 20 CFR 365 to update terminology to refer to individuals with a disability. This amendment replaces the term “handicap” with the term “disability” to match the statutory language in the Rehabilitation Act Amendment of 1992, Public Law 102-569, 106 Stat. 4344. *Timetable:* Action
Date
FR CiteDirect Final Rule
10/00/21
 *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:* No. *Agency Contact:* Marguerite P. Dadabo, Assistant General Counsel, Railroad Retirement Board, Office of General Counsel, 844 North Rush Street, Room 811, Chicago, IL 60611, *Phone:* 312 751-4945, *TDD Phone:* 312 751-4701, *Fax:* 312 751-7102. *RIN:* 3220-AB73


[FR Doc. 2021-14884 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7905-01-P